Loading...
PC RES 2026-005 ' T P.C. RESOLUTION NO.2026-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING, WITH CONDITIONS, A REVISION TO A PLANNING COMMISSION-APPROVED HEIGHT VARIATION PERMIT (CASE NO. PLHV2022-0002) TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITIONAL 71 FT2 SECOND-STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING TWO-STORY RESIDENCE FOR A NEW TOTAL STRUCTURE SIZE OF 2,988 FT2 (GARAGE INCLUDED) ALONG WITH MODIFICATIONS TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ROOF PITCH AND SECOND STORY WINDOWS AND DETERMINE THE PERMIT REVISION IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (PLRV2025-0006). WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, Property Owner, Mark Zaky (Applicant), submitted Height Variation Permit and Site Plan Review applications, requesting to the construct a 653 ft2 addition an existing 2,264 ft2 (garage included) two-story residence for a new total structure size of 2,917 ft2 measuring 26 feet in height with ancillary improvements, located at 28621 Mount Hood Court, in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes; and WHEREAS, on January 23, 2024, The City of Rancho Palos Verdes Planning Commission adopted P.C Resolution No. 2024-01 with a vote of 5-0 conditionally approving a Height Variation Permit and Site Plan Review for the property at 28621 Mount Hood Court; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2025, the City's Building & Safety Division issued Building Permits (Case No. RES2024-00204)for the approved project; and WHEREAS, on October 20, 2025, the Applicant submitted the requested Height Variation Permit Revision application, requesting to the construct an additional 92 ft2 second-story addition to an existing two-story residence for a new total structure size of 3,009 ft2 (garage included) along with modifications to the previously approved roof pitch and second-story windows; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2025, the project application was deemed incomplete for processing due to missing information and project materials; and WHEREAS, on January 22, 2026, the project application was determined to be complete for processing after the submittal of additional information by the Applicant on multiple occasions, and on the same day, a public notice was published in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News and mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius from the project site, providing a 30-day time-period to submit comments; and P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 1 of 10 WHEREAS, on February 24, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, considered public testimony, voted to continue the public hearing to its March 10, 2026 meeting to allow the Applicant an opportunity to address project concerns related to Neighborhood Compatibility; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2026, the Applicant submitted revised plans for the Planning Commission's consideration that reduced the proposed addition by 21 ft2 via a 3- foot setback along the southerly façade of the project; and, WHEREAS, on March 10, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Sections 21000 et. seq. ("CEQA"), the State's CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq., the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project has been determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA ("CEQA Guidelines"). Specifically, the project includes an addition to an existing structure that is less than 10,000 ft2; is located where existing public services and facilities are available; and is not in an environmentally sensitive area. Furthermore, none of the exceptions to the use of this exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines, section 15300.2 apply to this project and, specifically, the Project does not present any unusual circu mstances. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The proposed project involves the construction of an additional 71 ft2 second-story addition to an existing two-story residence for a new total structure size of 2,988 ft2 (garage included) along with modifications to the previously approved roof pitch and second-story windows. Section 2: The Planning Commission finds that the Height Variation Revision Permit for the construction an additional 71 ft2 second-story addition to an existing two- story residence for a new total structure size of 2,988 ft2 (garage included) along with modifications to the previously approved roof pitch and second-story windows is warranted based on the following findings: A. The Applicant has complied with the early neighborhood consultation process guidelines and procedures by obtaining 11 signatures (74%) from properties from properties within 100 feet of the project site and 41 signatures (26.2%) from properties within 500 feet of the project site, in which there is no active Homeowners' Association. P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 2 of 10 B. The proposed project does not significantly impair a view from public property (parks, major thoroughfares, bikeways, walkways or equestrian trails), which has been identified in the City's General Plan, Conceptual Trails Plan, Trails Network Plan, or Coastal Specific Plan. There are no viewing points or viewing sites that will be impacted due to the location of the project site and the topography in the immediate area. In addition, the property is not located within the City's Coastal Zone or any other City specific plan. C. The proposed project is located on an existing building pad, similar to other lots within the vicinity, and is not located either on a ridge nor on a prominent mass of land that overlooks or projects onto a lowland or body of water on two sides. Therefore, this finding can be made. D. A review of aerial imagery and site visits indicates that views of the harbor are visible from the immediate neighborhood to the east. The proposed 71 ft2 second- story addition at the,rear of the property will not result in significant view impacts on surrounding properties. Properties to the north and south along Mount Hood Court are at similar pad elevations and have views oriented away from the project site. The addition will not affect views from properties to the east, as it is located in the opposite direction.Additionally, properties to the west along Mount Rushmore Drive are situated approximately 20 feet higher in elevation, maintaining views over the proposed addition. The height of the addition will remain below the existing roof ridgeline and is consistent with the previously approved Height Variation Permit. E. There is no significant cumulative view impairment caused by granting the Height Variation Permit revision since the adjacent property (e.g. 28615 Mount Hood Court)and another property 2 houses down (28701 Mount Hood Court) are already improved with two-story residences, where no further view impairment can be created from these properties, there will be no significant view impairments if similar projects were to be constructed on single-story homes along Mount Hood Court. F. The proposed structure complies with all other Code requirements, including, but not limited to minimum required setbacks, maximum allowed lot coverage, parking, and building height. G. The immediate neighborhood consists of one- and two-story homes ranging from 1,763 ft2 to 3,385 ft2, with an average structure size of 2,251 ft2. The proposed 71 ft2 addition at the rear of the property will increase the structure size, but it will remain smaller than the largest home in the area. The scale of the addition will be compatible with the surrounding properties due to varying rooflines and façade articulations such as wooden beams and finished materials, which will help reduce the perceived bulk and mass from neighboring properties. The addition will not affect previously approved minimum setbacks and will not increase lot coverage, as it is situated over existing hardscape or structures. The proposed lot coverage of P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 3 of 10 45.92% is within the maximum allowable limit and is consistent with the neighborhood. The architectural style of the project, including stucco siding and a new gable roof design, matches the existing home and other residences in the area. The new gable roof design will slope downwards towards the rear of the property, minimizing its impact on neighboring properties to the west. The height of the addition will remain below the existing ridgeline, and setbacks will stay consistent with the previously approved permit. The proposed project complies with zoning regulations, and its scale, architectural style, and setbacks are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. H. The RPVMC defines privacy as "reasonable protection from intrusive visual observation," and the Height Variation Guidelines prioritize protecting outdoor privacy over indoor privacy. The proposed 71 ft2 second-story addition in du des two new windows on the rear west façade and a new bathroom window on the north side elevation. The design will not result in an unreasonable infringement on privacy for the following reasons: The new northerly facing bathroom window is located in the same area as the previously approved windows, so it does not create additional privacy impacts. No new second-story windows are proposed on the east or south facades. Although concerns were raised by a neighboring property regarding potential privacy impacts on their bedroom, kitchen, and family room, the proposed westerly facing windows do not create an unreasonable infringement of privacy, given the availability of privacy protections like blinds, and based on aerial analysis and site visits, the impact on these indoor spaces is minimal to non-existent, as the neighboring property at 28638 Mount Rushmore Road is situated approximately 20 feet higher in elevation than the project site, with the topography ensuring that views from the new windows will be limited due to the slope blocking most views, further minimizing any privacy concerns. Section 4: The proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA ("CEQA Guidelines"). Specifically, the project includes an addition to an existing structure that is less than 10,000 ft2; is located where existing public services and facilities are available; and is not in an environmentally sensitive area. Furthermore, none of the exceptions to the use of this exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines, section 15300.2 apply to this Project and, specifically, the Project does not present any unusual circumstances. Section 5: Any interested person aggrieved by this decision or by any portion of this decision may appeal to the City Council. The appeal shall set forth in writing, the grounds for appeal and any specific action being requested by the appellant. Any appeal letter must be filed within 15 calendar days of the date of this decision, or by 5:30 P.M. on Wednesday, March 25, 2026. A $3,193.00 appeal fee must accompany any appeal letter. If no appeal is filed timely, the Planning Commission's decision will be final at 5:30 P.M. on Wednesday, March 25, 2026. P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 4 of 10 Section 6: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information and findings included in the Staff Report, Minutes and other records of proceedings, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby adopts P.C. Resolution No. 2026- 05, approving with conditions, a revision to a Planning Commission-approved Height Variation Permit(Case No. PLHV2022-0002)to construct an additional 71 ft2 second-story addition to an existing two-story residence for a new total structure size of 2,988 ft2 (garage included) along with modifications to the previously approved roof pitch and second story windows and determine the permit revision is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Case No. PLRV2025-0006), subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in the attached Exhibit"A". PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of March 2026 by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHRISTEN, GEORGE, SANTAROSA, & O'CONNOR AND CHAIR NULMAN LMAN AND VICE CHAIR BRACH NOES: COMMISSIONER CHURA ABSTENTIONS: RECUSALS: ABSENT: Eric N I an Chair , ICP Director of o nity Development; and, Secretary of the Planning Commission P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 5 of 10 EXHIBIT 'A' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING CASE NO. PLRV2025-0006 (HEIGHT VARIATION PERMIT REVISION) 28621 MOUNT HOOD COURT General Conditions: 1. Prior to the submittal of plans into Building and Safety plan check, the Applicant and/or property owner shall submit to the City a statement, in writing, that they have read, understand, and agree to all conditions of approval contained in this Exhibit "A". Failure to provide said written statement within ninety (90) days following the date of this approval shall render this approval null and void. 2. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project. 3. Prior to conducting any work in the public right of way, such as for curb cuts, dumpsters, temporary improvements and/or permanent improvements, the Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Director of Public Works. 4. Approval of this permit shall not be construed as a waiver of applicable and appropriate zoning regulations, or any Federal, State, County and/or City laws and regulations. Unless otherwise expressly specified, all other requirements of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code (RPVMC)shall apply. 5. Pursuant to RPVMC §17.78.040, the Director of Community Development is authorized to make minor modifications to the approved plans and any of the conditions of approval if such modifications will achieve substantially the same results as would strict compliance with the approved plans and conditions. Substantial changes to the project shall be considered a revision and require approval by the final body that approved the original project, which may require new and separate environmental review and public notification. P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 6 of 10 6. The project development on the site shall conform to the specific standards contained in these conditions of approval or, if not addressed herein, shall conform to the residential development standards of the RPVMC, including but not limited to height, setback and lot coverage standards. 7. Failure to comply with and adhere to all of these conditions of approval may be cause to revoke the approval of the project pursuant to the revocation procedures contained in RPVMC §17.86.060, or may be cause of the issuance of administrative citations as described in RPVMC Ch. 1.16. 8. If the Applicant has not submitted an application for a building permit for the approved project or not commenced the approved project as described in RPVMC §17.86.070 within one year of the final effective date of this Notice of Decision, approval of the project shall expire and be of no further effect unless, prior to expiration, a written request for extension is filed with the Community Development Department and approved by the Director. 9. In the event that any of these conditions conflict with the recommendations and/or requirements of another permitting agency or City department, the stricter standard shall apply. 10. Unless otherwise designated in these conditions, all construction shall be completed in substantial conformance with the plans stamped approved by the City with the effective date of this approval. 11. This approval is only for the items described within these conditions and identified on the stamped approved plans and is not an approval of any existing illegal or legal non-conforming structures on the property, unless the approval of such illegal or legal non-conforming structure is specifically identified within these conditions or on the stamped approved plans. 12. The construction site and adjacent public and private properties and streets shall be kept free of all loose materials resembling trash and debris in excess of that material used for immediate construction purposes. Such excess material may include, but not be limited to: the accumulation of debris, garbage, lumber, scrap metal, concrete asphalt, piles of earth, salvage materials, abandoned or discarded furniture, appliances or other household fixtures. 13. All construction sites shall be maintained in a secure, safe, neat and orderly manner, to the satisfaction of the City's Building Official. All construction waste and debris resulting from a construction, alteration or repair project shall be removed on a weekly basis by the contractor or property owner. Existing or temporary portable bathrooms shall be provided during construction. Portable bathrooms shall be placed in a location that will minimize disturbance to the surrounding property owners, to the satisfaction of the City's Building Official. P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 7 of 10 14. Construction projects that are accessible from a street right-of-way or an abutting property and which remain in operation or expect to remain in operation for over 30 calendar days shall provide temporary construction fencing, as defined in RPVMC §17.56.050(C). Unless required to protect against a safety hazard, temporary construction fencing shall not be erected sooner than 15 days prior to commencement of construction. 15. Permitted hours and days for construction activity are 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday, with no construction activity permitted on Sundays or on the legal holidays specified in RPVMC §17.96.920. During demolition, construction and/or grading operations, trucks shall not park, queue and/or idle at the project site or in the adjoining street rights-of-way before 7:00 AM Monday through Friday and before 9:00 AM on Saturday, in accordance with the permitted hours of construction stated in this condition. When feasible to do so, the construction contractor shall provide staging areas on-site to minimize off- site transportation of heavy construction equipment. These areas shall be located to maximize the distance between staging activities and neighboring properties, subject to approval by the Building Official. 16. Exterior residential lighting shall comply with the standards of RPVMC §17.56.030. No outdoor lighting is permitted where the light source is directed toward or results in direct illumination of a parcel of property or properties other than that upon which such light source is physically located. 17. For all grading, landscaping and construction activities, the Applicant shall employ effective dust control techniques, either through screening and/or watering. 18. The Applicant shall remove the project silhouette within 7 days after a final decision has been rendered and the City's appeal process has been exhausted. Project Specific Conditions: 19. This approval shall allow for the following: • Construct a 71 ft2 second-story addition to an existing two-story residence fora new total structure size of 2,988 ft2(garage included); and • Modify the previously approved permit to modify the proposed roof to utilize a new singular gable roof in the rear of the project residence at the same height and two new second-story windows along the western façade and one new second-story window along the northern façade of the second story. BUILDING AREA CERTIFICATION REQUIRED, to be provided by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer PRIOR TO THE FRAMING INSPECTION. P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 8 of 10 20. The height of the approved residence shall be as depicted on the stamped APPROVED plans and in no case shall the addition to the residence extend above a height of 26 feet, as measured from the lowest finished grade covered by structure (elev. 99.00 feet) to the highest proposed roof ridgel in a (elev. 125.00 feet); and a height of 22.2 feet as measured from the highest elevation of the existing grade covered by the structure (102.8 feet) to the highest proposed roof ridgeline (elev. 125.00 feet). BUILDING HEIGHT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED, to be provided by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer PRIOR TO ROOF SHEATHING INSPECTION, based on the above-mentioned instructions. 21. The proposed addition shall maintain setbacks of 20-foot front, 11.92 foot north side, 5.0 foot south side, and a 55.17 foot rear. SETBACK CERTIFICATION REQUIRED, to be provided by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer PRIOR TO POURING FOUNDATIONS. 22. Unless modified by the approval of future planning applications, the approved project within the RS-5 zoning district shall maintain a maximum of 52% lot coverage. 23. The project site shall maintain a minimum of two enclosed parking spaces at all times. An enclosed parking space shall have an unobstructed ground space of no less than 9 feet in width and 20 feet in depth, with a minimum 7-foot vertical clearance. An unendosed en dosed parking space shall have an unobstructed ground space of no less than 9 feet in width by 20 feet in depth. 24. All colors and materials for the structure and roof shall be as shown in the stamped APPROVED plans. 25. All applicable Conditions or Approval under P.C Resolution No. 2024-01 shall remain in effect with this project approval. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT OR GRADING PERMIT ISSUANCE 26. All applicable soils/geotechnical reports, if required by the Building and Safety Division, shall be approved by the City's Geologist. 27. A drainage plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 28. Based on a foliage analysis conducted on January 9, 2024, the following foliage shall be trimmed or removed PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE in order to protect the view from surrounding viewing areas: P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 9 of 10 1. Crown reduce the Palm Trees located in the front yard by trimming down to the lowest adjacent ridgeline of the primary structure. The owner of the property is responsible for maintaining, in perpetuity, all foliage on the property, which exceeds 16 feet in height, as measured from the base of the tree or which exceeds the lowest adjacent ridge line of the primary structure, whichever is lower, so as not to significantly impair the view from surrounding viewing areas. P.C. Resolution No. 2026-05 Page 10 of 10