Loading...
CC SR 20260203 04 - Landslide Emergency Extension CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/03/2026 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business AGENDA TITLE: Consider updates on the Greater Portuguese Bend-Ancient Altamira Landslide Complex. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: (1) Receive and file an update on the Greater Portuguese Bend-Ancient Altamira Landslide Complex (Landslide Complex) conditions, activities, and financials; (2) Approve an appropriation of $570,000 in the Capital Infrastructure Program Fund and General Fund, under Federal Grant Revenue for FEMA’s Public Assistance Cost Recovery Program; (3) Adopt Resolution No. 2026-__, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING FOR A TERM OF 60 DAYS THE TEMPORARY PROHIBITION ON TRAVEL BY UNICYCLES, BICYCLES, MOTORCYCLES, AND OTHER ONE- OR TWO-WHEELED VEHICLES ON PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH WITHIN THE LANDSLIDE COMPLEX DUE TO CONTINUED ROADWAY CONDITIONS; (4) Adopt Resolution No. 2026-__, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CONTINUING THE LOCAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 2023- 47 ADOPTED ON OCTOBER 3, 2023 FOR AN ADDITIONAL 60 DAY PERIOD; and, (5) Adopt Resolution No. 2026-__, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARIES OF THE PORTUGUESE BEND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, PORTUGUESE BEND BEACH CLUB, AND SEAVIEW NEIGHBORHOODS BASED ON SUDDEN ENERGY SHORTAGES, PLANNED DEENERGIZING EVENTS, AND INTERNET SERVICE SHUT OFFS AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NOS. 2024-52 AND 2024-57 FOR AN ADDITIONAL 60 DAYS. FISCAL IMPACT: VR Cost to Date: The total estimated cost for the Greater Portuguese Bend–Ancient Altamira Landslide Complex from 2022 through June 30, 2026, is projected to reach approximately $64.4 million. This cost is funded through multiple sources, mainly funded from the CIP Fund, General Fund, Metro Funds, ARPA, Supervisor Hahn’s Social Program Grant, Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 2, and Los Angeles Flood Control District. 1 CITYOF RANCHO PALOS VERDES FY 2024-25: A comprehensive summary of expenditures incurred for FY 2024-25 is included in the August 19, 2025 staff report and can be found at the following link: https://rpv.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=4840&meta_id=130486 FY 2025-26 Budget: The FY 2025-26 City Council adopted budget for the City’s response to the Portuguese Bend Landslide is $17.75 million in the CIP and $860,300 for property tax assessments in the General Fund, as detailed in the tables below. On September 16, 2025, the City Council approved a revised budget based on a current assessment of field conditions and a reassessment of the proposed winterization projects. The total revised budget is $16.4 million, a decrease of $2.16 million. On December 16, 2025, the City Council approved Staff’s proposed carryover of unspent funds in the amount of $1.45 million from FY 2024-25 for the emergency stabilization measures that were not completed by June 30,2026. Based on these changes, FY 2025- 26 Revised Budget is now $17.9 million. The breakdown for each fund is shown below: Capital Infrastructure Program (CIP) Fund: Funding Source: Capital Infrastructure Program (CIP) Fund FY 2025-26 Revised Budget 8202 - Abalone Cove Sanitary Sewer Repair Program 3,000,000 8304 - Portuguese Bend Landslide Remediation Project 530,000 8307 - Portuguese Bend Landslide Remediation - Emergency Stabilization Measures (was $6,187,000 before c ont. a pprop.) 7,635,775 Construction 3,984,045 Professional Services (Engineering, Environmental, Inspection, Management 1,627,955 Contingency 575,000 FY 2024-25 Continuing Appropriations (Approved 12/16/25) 1,448,775 8308 - Portuguese Bend Landslide Remediation - Deep Dewatering Wells 1 thru 6 Permanent Power (City's Federal Grant Match) 525,000 8309 - Portuguese Bend Landslide Hydrology & Hydraulics Study 1,265,000 TOTAL - FY 2025-26 (CIP FUND – PREVIOUSLY $13,675,000) $12,955,775 Special Revenue (Restricted) Funds: Funding Sources: Special Revenue (Restricted) Funds FY 2025-26 Revised Budget 8302 - Palos Verdes Drive South Landslide Repair Program 2,500,000 SB-1 Gas Tax (Fund 204) 750,000 Prop C (Fund 215) 1,150,000 Measure R (Fund 220) 600,000 8308 - Portuguese Bend Landslide Remediation - Deep Dewatering Wells 1 thru 6 Permanent Power 1,575,000 2 Federal Grant 1,575,000 TOTAL - FY 2025-26 SPECIAL REVENUE (RESTRICTED) FUNDS $4,075,000 General Fund: Funding Source: General Fund FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget 3150 Property Tax Assessments KCLAD 475,902 ACLAD 384,398 TOTAL - FY 2025-26 General Fund $860,300 ORIGINATED BY: Ramzi Awwad, Director of Public Works Vina Ramos, Director of Finance VR Brandy Forbes, Director of Community Development Katie Lozano, Open Space and Trails Manager REVIEWED BY: Catherine Jun, Deputy City Manager CJ APPROVED BY: Ara Mihranian, AICP, City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: A. Resolution No. 2026-___ Continuing Temporary Prohibition of One- or Two- Wheeled Vehicles on Palos Verdes Drive South for 60 Days (Page A-1) B. Resolution No. 2026-___ Continuing Local Emergency (Page B-1) C. Resolution No. 2026-___ Continuing Local De-energization Emergency (Page C-1) D. Displacement Rate Contour Maps: December 2, 2025 and January 8, 2026 (Page D-1) E. Landslide GPS Survey Reports: December 2, 2025 and January 8, 2026 (Page E-1) F. December 16, 2025 Staff Report (link) G. November 4, 2025 Staff Report (link) H. August 19, 2025 Staff Report (link) I. Cal OES Second Appeal Recommendation Letters to FEMA J. Cal OES Notice of Obligation and Payment for FEMA DR-4769 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Tonight, the City Council is being asked to receive and file an update on the Landside Complex conditions, activities, and financials. City Council is also being asked to extend the temporary prohibition of one- or two-wheeled vehicles on Palos Verdes Drive South, continue the local emergency, and continue the local de-energization emergency for 60 days due to continuing landslide conditions. 3 • Following are key rainfall updates: o As of January 23, 2026, 11.61 inches of rain have fallen in the 2025-26 rainy season, which is about 84% of average seasonal rainfall. • Following are key movement rate updates: o The Abalone Cove Landslide accelerated an average of 18.1% to approximately 2.15 inches per week from November 4,2025 to January 8, 2026 with the current movement rate approximately 17 times the October 2022 pre-deep slip plane activation rate. o The Portuguese Bend Landslide accelerated an average of 20.8% to 1.38 inches per week from November 4, 2025 to January 8, 2026; with the current movement rate approximately 8 times the October 2022 pre-deep slip plane activation rate. o KCL continues to show no measurable movement. • Following are key dewatering program updates: o The City currently has six of its original nine remaining City DDWs operational and they pumped approximately 21million gallons of water in December 2025; which is a decrease from recent months attributable to the shearing of three wells for which re-drilling bids are currently being solicited. o ACLAD currently has 15 operational wells and pumped a total of approximately 4.3 million gallons of water in the month of December 2025, which is consistent with the November total and is a decrease from prior months due to the disruption of some pumping during December rain events. o KCLAD currently has 3 operational wells pumping and pumped at an average rate of approximately 13 million gallons in December 2025. • Following are key winterization updates: o City winterization of Upper Altamira Canyon is substantially complete with site- cleanup and erosion control measures remaining. o ACLAD winterization of the Palos Verdes Drive South (PVDS) culvert and Lower Altamira Canyon (seaward of PVDS) using City loan funds and a City financial contribution not to exceed $200,000 is complete. o Winterization of Portuguese Canyon is substantially complete. o Winterization measures performed as expected during the December 2025 rain events. o Maintenance of other winterized areas will be ongoing within the City Council approved budget. • Following are key financial updates: o As of January 20, 2026, a total of $10.3 million or 58% of the total budget for FY 2025-26 has been spent or encumbered, including $5.1 million (28%) spent and $5.2 million (30%) encumbered. This is an increase of $1.7 million (+53%) since December 2025. o The projected fund balance in the CIP Fund by June 30, 2026, is $14.1 million. After applying the required reserves of $5 million and adjustments including carryover and adjustments from prior year, the projected CIP restricted balance is $8.3 million. 4 o ACLAD has spent $1.59 million or 98% percent of its $1.6 million loan from the City, mostly on new well maintenance and operations. Additional expenses include $137,860 for surface drainage work, of which the City reimbursed $94,500 as part of the Altamira Canyon winterization efforts. o KCLAD has spent $1.1 million or 59% percent of its $1.9 million loan from the City, mostly on dewatering well programs. o On January 26, 2026, the City received its first FEMA’s Public Assistance cost recovery reimbursement from Cal OES in the amount of $447,044. • City Council is being asked to extend the temporary prohibition of one- or two-wheeled vehicles on Palos Verdes Drive South, continue the local emergency, and continue the local de-energization emergency for 60 days due to continuing landslide conditions. BACKGROUND: The Greater Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex, sometimes called the Ancient Altamira Landslide Complex (Landslide Complex), encompasses four historically active landslide areas in the City: the Portuguese Bend Landslide (PBL), the Abalone Cove Landslide (ACL), the Klondike Canyon Landslide (KCL), and the Beach Club Landslide (BCL) and includes areas uphill from the PBL and ACL, within the Landslide Complex as mapped by various agencies. On October 3, 2023, the City Council conducted a discussion regarding the conditions of the Landslide Complex. After considering information presented that evening, including public testimony, the City Council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2023-47 declaring the existence of a local emergency within the geographic boundaries of the Landslide Complex and adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 674U to establish a 45-day moratorium on the acceptance or processing of applications, issuance of permits, and construction of all structures within the Landslide Complex (Moratorium). The City Council has extended the local emergency on multiple occasions, and it remains in effect until February 14, 2026, unless extended again this evening. On August 20, 2024, the City Council authorized the emergency installation of immediate stabilization and protection measures consisting of deep dewatering wells (DDWs) in response to exponential acceleration of the Landslide Complex as a result of historic rainfall during the 2022-23 and 2023-24 rainy seasons. On October 1, 2024, the City Council authorized an expansion of the DDW program to the Abalone Cove area, on City-owned property. Additionally, the City Council authorized a winterization program on City-owned property in the Landslide Complex without waiving the Abalone Cove Landslide Hazard Abatement District’s (ACLAD) and Klondike Canyon Landslide Hazard Abatement District’s (KCLAD) responsibilities as identified in their plans of control. On February 18, 2025, the City Council affirmed only using the $1.6 million City loan to implement the ACLAD’s DDW Plan including two monitoring wells and instrumentation that would be installed, maintained and operated by ACLAD within their jurisdictional 5 boundaries. A sum of $100,000 was also approved to provide ACLAD with professional services (i.e. project management and geologist). On May 6, 2025, the City Council received a summary of the status of the DDW and winterization programs. On September 16, 2025, the City Council modified the FY 2025-26 landslide emergency response budget for several projects/activities resulting in an overall reduction of $2,168,000, to preserve funding for future year operations and maintenance of landslide measures. Additionally, the City Council authorized the use of the City’s winterization contingency of $200,000 to pay for 50% of the cost of repairing the culvert under Palos Verdes Drive South (PVDS) and 100% of the cost of Lower Altamira Canyon winterization by ACLAD. This report will serve as the 60-day standing report on the current conditions of the Landslide Complex and consideration to extend the local state of emergency and prohibition of one- and two-wheeled vehicles along PVDS through the Landslide Complex. DISCUSSION: 1. Greater Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex Update The City Council is being asked to receive and file an update on the Landslide Complex conditions, activities, and financials. Geologic Conditions A summary of the 2022-23 and 2023-24 rainy seasons can be found in the May 7, 2024 staff report at the following link: https://rpv.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=4522&meta_id=118930 A summary of the 2024-25 rainy season can be found in the May 6, 2025 staff report at the following link: https://rpv.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=5&clip_id=4791&meta_id=127446 For the 2025-26 rainy season, 11.61 inches of rain has fallen at Rolling Hills Fire Station 56 near the crest of the Palos Verdes Peninsula as of January 23, 2026. This represents about 84% of the annual average for the entire season. Most of the rain fell in four storm periods: Oct 14-15, 2025 (1.19”), Nov 13-21, 2025 (5.52”), Dec 23-26 (3.11”) and December 31-January 6, 2026 (1.78”). The November and December 2025 storms, which occurred after the November 4, 2025 GPS monitoring and before the January 8, 2026 GPS monitoring, have had an impact on the rate of landslide movement, contributing to landslide reacceleration following a prolonged period of deceleration. A similar phenomenon was observed in March and April of 2025, following February and March 2025 rainfall; however, landslide deceleration resumed as of the May 4, 2025 GPS monitoring. 6 Recent GPS survey data published by McGee Surveying Consulting for the approximately “monthly” monitoring periods ending December 2, 2025 and January 8, 2026 were reviewed and analyzed (Attachment E). Figures 1 and 2 on the following page, present scaled displacement rates (i.e., movement velocities), movement vectors, and contours (aka “heat maps”) of displacement rates for the December 2, 2025 and the January 8, 2026 monitoring periods. (Attachment D) Figure 1: Scaled Displacement Rates for December 2, 2025 Monitoring Period [CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] 7 EXPLANATION . _, Lini:5 o f theAnoi<!,nt Portug,.,e~e61!<1 d Llonc shceCo ~--~,..1""",. -.;;,t ~,y~ .,•:,': ·t~; ~ ....... -~,~i Figure 2: Scaled Displacement Rates for January 8, 2026 Monitoring Period Figure 3, on the following page, provides contours of landslide displacement rate change from March 9, 2025 to January 8, 2025; which provides perspective on which areas of the landslide complex are decelerating the fastest within a specified period of time. [CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] 8 EXPLANATION Lirrit:I o 'lhe Ancient Port.l'J'.l'!'M' Ben~ un<::~liee Co~ 20231.2()24Ull'ldslideF"'/!tur<!1 li'iU1 0<\CCS_._,.,..,¢1niji _.,,,. ~t'.,~~~~!~~~::;~abr:~.~.:;,::;ent GPS Monumont Cispl;)C(l'YK)nt Rato . / 1~~-22'325 tc>.Jnn.:ary8.2C'2e/ Ois;lacOKTVni ','itCk,1 Sc.!M 1"• 8 "/~-"; i '--•--*'-. . . . . . . -:;;--···,•:~ ~ Figure 3: March 9, 2025 to January 8, 2026 Displacement Rate Change Contour Map Table 1 provides a summary of movement rates for each sub-slide over time, including a comparison of the pre-emergency declaration, acceleration peak, last deceleration, and current status. Table 1: Sub-Slide Movement Rates as of January 8, 2026 Sub-Slide Oct 2022 Oct 2023* July 2024** Nov 2025 Jan 2026 Average Movement (Inches/Week) KCL 0.06 0.33 4.34 0.0 0.0 PBL 0.17 0.91 11.02 1.16 1.38 ACL 0.14 0.72 10.25 1.82 2.15 Upper Altamira 0.08 0.52 9.17 1.74 1.91 Factor of Movement KCL 1 5.5 72.3 0 0 PBL 1 5.4 64.8 6.8 8.0 ACL 1 5.1 72.3 13.0 16.9 Upper Altamira 1 6.5 114.6 21.8 23.7 *Month of emergency declaration **Month of peak movement rate For all points monitored across the entire Landslide Complex, the following are the key conclusions for the time period of November 4, 2025 to January 8, 2026: • The average movement rate for all points still moving within the active landslide boundary is 1.66 inches/week, a 14.3% increase since November 4, 2025. The most likely factor contributing to landslide reacceleration is the added mass (aka, driving force) of significant early-season rainfall percolating into the landslide. The 2025-26 season rainfall total has already reached 84% of the annual average for 9 EXPLANATION Limb of the Andent Portuguese Be'ld La/'tdshdeComplex Lim t&o!HistoricallyMapped Landslides 20231202-'LandslideFeatures (t.:c,~<l<in C!':A fiol:!r,opp;r,;;J L,motsDf2023-2124 Miljof LancsliceMove:nent ib&ffdOI\CSA fltldml ~lllQ ior'Kl«lltMNtrw .urwov, : ,-~-,-~-:-. . . the area. The effect of this acceleration can be seen between Figures 1 and 2, with slight expansion of the 1-2 inch/week and 2-3 inch/week color zones. • The ACL movement, within its historical boundary, has accelerated an average of approximately 18% from November 4, 2025 through January 8, 2026, following a prolonged period of deceleration. The average rate of movement for these points was approximately 2.15 inches/week in the most recent monitoring period from December 2, 2025 through January 8, 2026. As of November 4, 2025, the ACL movement had decelerated an average of 81% since the deep dewatering program commenced mid-September 2024; however, unusually high early season rainfall has contributed to reacceleration through January 8, 2026. The fastest moving area remains the upper portion of the ACL at approximately 2.48 inches/week. As can be seen in Figure 3, notwithstanding the recent acceleration, the ACL continues to exhibit the highest reduction in landslide velocity between March 9 and January 8, 2026. This is believed to be due to the recent deep dewatering program implemented by ACLAD. • The PBL, within its historical boundary, has accelerated an average of 20.8% from November 4, 2025 through January 8, 2026, following a prolonged period of deceleration. The average rate of movement was approximately 1.39 inches/week from November 4, 2025 through January 8, 2026. The PBL movement had decelerated an average of 88.3% since the deep dewatering program commenced in mid-September 2024, through November 4, 2025; however, unusually high early season rainfall has contributed to reacceleration from November 4, 2025 through January 8, 2026. A similar pattern of reacceleration of movement velocity occurred in response to rainfall in February and March 2025; however, this proved to be temporary as the rainy season waned and pumping of deep dewatering wells continued. • Future near-term movements of the landslide complex will be dependent upon several factors, including rainfall through the remainder of the rainy season, completion of winterization efforts, and continued operation and maintenance of deep dewatering wells. • There has been no measurable movement of the KCL since mid-October 2024. Although some points in the KCL have periodically shown measurable changes in their GPS position, these movements are at or below the limits of instrument precision. Further absolute vector analysis shows that the changes are not in a consistent progressive pattern, but rather in random directions, which indicates GPS “noise” rather than actual movement. Because there is no movement occurring, the KCL has decelerated 100% since the deep dewatering program commenced in mid-September 2024. • The movement rate of the Greater Ancient Altamira Landslide Complex/Ancient Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex GPS monitoring points outside of the historical boundaries of the ACL and PBL has, on average, accelerated 12% from November 4, 2025 through January 8, 2026, following a prolonged period of deceleration. The average rate of movement for these points was approximately 1.92 inches/week from November 4, 2025 through January 8, 2026. The Greater Portuguese Bend/Ancient Altamira Landslide Complex points have decelerated an 10 average of 79% since the deep dewatering program commenced in mid- September, 2024. • There continues to be no measurable movement of points along the Burma Road switchbacks since December 3, 2024. Vector analysis performed on the GPS points in this area confirms that the reported data represent GPS instrument “noise” rather than actual movement. • There continues to be no measurable movement of points along Burma Road, located just north of the mapped boundary of major landslide movement (2023- 2025) and downslope from recent movement occurring in Rolling Hills in the Flying Triangle Landslide and the areas of Cinchring Road and Quail Ridge Road. This lack of measurable movement continues to support a hypothesis that the Altamira Complex and the landslide(s) further north-northeast in Rolling Hills, portions of which continue to creep, are not directly structurally connected. • There continues to be no measurable movement of GPS points located outside of the mapped Greater Ancient Altamira Landslide Complex/Ancient Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex, including at Abalone Shoreline Park, in the Island View tract, at the top of Burma Road, at the west end of the former Livingston Quarry area (Forrestal), and in the Seaview Tract. • Point AB76, just inside the far west margin of the landslide on the York property, ceased moving as of March 2025. Open Space, Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, Trails, and Beach Conditions Current trail and beach closures continue to exist within the Portuguese Bend, Filiorum, and Abalone Cove Reserves. Approximately 12.5 miles of trails within these Reserves remain closed, as well as the open space area around the Archery Range, due to landslide-related damage and/or abatement work. For the same reasons, three public beaches (Abalone Cove Beach, Sacred Cove Beach, and the beach below the Archery Club) remain closed. The City Manager temporarily closed these areas in close coordination with the City Geologist, L.A. County Fire Department and Lifeguards, California Coastal Commission, and Public Safety agencies. The City continues to monitor these areas closely with managing partners and subject experts for opportunities to reopen. At the September 16, 2025 City Council meeting, members of the Portuguese Bend Community expressed the significant detrimental impact to their community of having so many trails closed adjacent to their community. They spoke of the specific impact to equestrians and voiced their need for trail access. They additionally expressed their desire to use the trails located within the 96-acre Wildlife Corridor acquired in 2022. Detailed information on these topics was provided in the “Additional Information” section of the November 4, 2025 City Council Staff Report which is linked above as Attachment G. 11 Deep Dewatering Well Program Status The Deep Dewatering Well (DDW) component of the emergency stabilization activities is complete. The August 19, 2025 City Council staff report shows the locations of the DDWs and monitoring wells (Attachment H). Table 2 below provides the current DDW program statistics. Following are key observations on the current status of DDW operations: • There are nine (9) out of the original 11 installed City DDWs that have not been decommissioned and extracted approximately 21 million gallons of water in December 2025. 6 DDWs are currently online and 3 have recently sheared due to land movement and are scheduled to be re-drilled over the next several weeks. Table 2: DDW Current Water Extraction Rates as of January 26, 2026 DDW No. Date Operational Current Approximate Water Extraction Rate (Gallons Per Minute) Total Water Extraction to Date Acre-Ft Million Gallons 1 9/13/2024 95 (re-drilled 3/21/25 and 9/25/25) 173 56 2 9/17/2024 85 (re-drilled 5/29/25) 179 58 3 9/21/2024 45 (re-drilled 3/24/25) 161 52 4 9/21/2024 N/A, Decommissioned 3/27/25 113 37 4A 3/29/2025 0 (Currently offline – sheared) 5 9/25/2024 30 (re-drilled 3/26/25 and 9/18/2025)  155 51 6 9/28/2024 0 (Currently offline – sheared) (re-drilled 12/29/24 and 5/23/25) 137 45 7 10/15/2024 N/A, Decommissioned 6/3/25  15 5 8 10/17/2024 0 (Currently offline – sheared) (re-drilled 8/14/25) 107 35 9 10/25/2024 N/A, Decommissioned 11/07/24  89 29 9A 11/16/2024 45 (re-drilled 12/29/24, 5/10/25, 8/22/25) 10 10/24/2024 100 (re-drilled 5/11/25) 190 62 11 12/3/2024 N/A, Decommissioned 3/14/25  2 1 Totals 400 1,321 431 Underground water pressure measuring instruments, called vibrating wire piezometers (piezometers) were installed to assist in determining the effects of DDWs on reducing high water pressures, including locally artesian pressures, that might be contributing to accelerated landslide movement. Five monitoring wells with piezometers were installed under the deep slip plane as well as under the shallow slip plane to measure uplift pressure on each slip plane. The locations of the piezometers can be found in the August 19, 2025 City Council Staff Report (Attachment H). Chart 1 shows water pressures from the piezometers installed under the deep slip plane and Chart 2, following page, shows water pressures from the piezometers installed above the deep slip plane and below the shallower slip plane. The charts show water pressure from the time the piezometers were installed until the present time, or until they stopped functioning due to landslide shearing. Pressure on the plots has been converted to equivalent feet of water pressure. 12 Chart 1: PBL Deep Slip Plane Water Pressure Chart 2: PBL Mid-Deep Slip Plane Water Pressure For those piezometers near the DDWs in the PBL (P-1, P-2, and P-3), the plots show a marked decrease in pressure immediately following the start of the DDW program. The 13 SEPT M ER OCT BER NOVE BER DECE BER ,IAN ARY FEBR ARY ~~I ~~ l "'~ I ~I PBL PIEZOMETER t -------------------------------- -------------------------------- r AU UST SEPT MBER OCT BER NOVE BER DECE BER JAN ARY 2026 NOTE: SOLID LINES NEAR PUMPING WELLS DASHED LINES NO PUMPING WELLS PBL PIEZOMETER NOTE· SOLID LINES NEAR PUMPING WELLS DASHED LINES NO PUMPING WELLS PBL DEEP PIEZOMETER-JANUARY 2026 RANCHO PALOS VERDES LOS ANGELES COUNTY , CA Geo-Loaic Allee IAT11.:I DAAWN 8Y: LP OAl C: JANUARY 2026 J08 MO.: SR25.1021 PBL MI D DEEP PIEZOMETER-JANUARY 2026 RANCHO PALOS VERDES LOS ANGELES COU NTY, CA DMM,i l'1: LP 0.-.Tt: JNfJNlr 2025 JOI HO.: SR25.1021 surviving piezometer, P-2, continued to show a relatively constant decrease to more of a somewhat current steady state pressure drop over time, which correlated to reduced surface movement in nearby GPS survey points. Then, in the July to August 2025 timeframe, there was an increase in pressure which correlated to reduced operation of DDWs for re-drilling and other maintenance. Once the DDWs were back to regular operation, there was a continued reduction in pressure. However, from November 2025 to January 2026, there is a very slight increase in pressure, which may be reflective of the early season rainfall events. The piezometers far away from DDWs (E-2-2 and E-2-5) show a slight increase to only a slight decrease in pressure over the last six months or so. The slight reduction in piezometers E-2-2 and E-2-5 is likely the result of drying conditions, with the slight increase reflecting the period of time when DDWs were offline for re-drilling and maintenance. In general, E-2-2 and E-2-5 do not show any marked increase in pressure that can be correlated to the recent rains. This is most likely due to lag time for significant pressures to build up and accumulate under and within the landslide. Emergency Winterization Projects Status Upper Altamira Canyon Re-grading the side of the canyon that is closing in on the other side and installation of the pipe is substantially complete with some site clean-up and erosion control measures remaining. This winterization work will temporarily close fissures and provide for some water flow through the pipe. This work will minimize runoff from recharging the ground water table in anticipation of dewatering wells continuing to reduce the rate of movement. Staff notes that there remains a risk that the pipe may be crushed again as the canyon may close in on itself before the end of the rainy season, and it is not likely that the pipe could be maintained after rains because conditions may become unsuitable for equipment. If conditions remain suitable for pipe repairs, there would be additional costs for the maintenance work beyond the current approved budget that the City Council may be asked to consider at a future meeting. Kelvin Canyon Grading from the FY 2024-25 emergency winterization remains in good condition. Maintenance of the existing winterization will continue to be performed on an as-needed basis within the approved budget. Klondike Canyon Maintenance of the pond liner and erosion control measures from FY 2024-25 continues to be performed on an as-needed basis within the approved budget. Fissure Filling/Portuguese Canyon Installation of temporary piping to convey water from the depressed area above Burma Road Trail to lower areas of the landslide is substantially complete. This work will allow water ponding above the Burma Road Trail to be pumped out and keep free flowing, thereby reducing opportunities for infiltration at the head of the landslide. 14 Seaview Neighborhood Re-graded and paved streets, storm water capture inlets, drainage pipes, and graben liners from the FY 2024-25 winterization remain in good condition. Staff assessed performance of the drainage features during and after the December 2025 rain event and found that all winterization elements functioned appropriately. Maintenance work will continue to be performed on an as-needed basis within the approved budget. Additional Winterization Recommendations Based on evolving field conditions, the City Council authorized additional priority locations for emergency winterization measures within the existing approved budget measures as shown in Figure 4. This winterization work is now complete. Figure 4: Proposed Winterization Measures North of the Portuguese Bend Community ACLAD Update ACLAD Dewatering Well Program Status Following is a summary status of the ACLAD’s dewatering activities as of January 21, 2026. The locations of ACLAD dewatering wells can be found in the August 19, 2025 City Council Staff Report (Attachment H). • ACLAD currently has 15 operational wells (a combination of original wells and new DDWs) that have pumped a total of approximately 4.3 million gallons of water in the month of December 2025. 15 Areas outside City property boundaries N = 1soft A • Operating generators during rain is problematic; therefore, wells were offline during rainy weather. • Two wells near the Narcissa/Cinnamon intersection above Wayfarers Chapel are showing increased production over the past month. • Generators are being replaced with less noisy models so that operating hours can be increased. ACLAD installed piezometers in the vicinity of their DDWs to collect data on the impact of the DDWs on high water pressures, including local artesian pressures, that might be contributing to accelerated landslide movement. The locations of the piezometers can be found in the August 19, 2025 City Council Staff Report (Attachment H). The piezometers were installed under the deep slip plane as well as under the shallow slip plane to measure uplift pressure on each slip plane. The City’s consultant engineering geologists, in coordination with ACLAD, reviewed the data from the piezometers and prepared charts to show water pressure over time. Charts 3 and 4 show water pressure from the time the piezometers were installed until the present time. Pressure on the plots has been converted to equivalent feet of water pressure. Chart 3: ACLAD Deep Slip Plane Water Pressure 16 ACLAD PIEZOMETER 240---.--~----~--~-~-~-~--------------------------~ 22 I J ·' ).l l ~I ~, ~I ~I WI rn , ~I -, I t I I t I I ~ I }u UST I ;;;j .;I ~I <I ~, ~, -, ~ ~I ;, :S! 8! SEPT MBER OCT BER NOTE: SOLID LINES NEAR PUMPING WELLS DASHED LIN ES NO PUMPING WELLS NOVE BER CECE BER JAN ARY 2026 ACLAD DEEP PIEZOMETER-DECEMBER 2025 RANCHO PALOS VERDES LOS ANGE LES COUNTY, CA Geo-Loaic ··••c IAT1a."::I DRAWN BY· LP OAT(, 0£C(M8£R 2025 J08 NO · SR25.1021 Chart 4: ACLAD Mid-Deep Slip Plane Water Pressure The plots for those piezometers near the DDWs in the ACL (Alta 8 and Alta 9), show a marked decrease in pressure immediately following the start of the DDW program. The direct correlation between pumping rates/volumes and pressure decrease is pronounced. While there was a continuous decreasing trend with the initiation and continuance of pumping on nearby wells, reciprocally there was a sharp rise in water pressure measurements when nearby wells ceased operation due to maintenance issues (some of which resulted in cessation of pumping for 3 weeks or more). Sharp pressure rises are evident on the ACL plots during this time period. Alta 8 shows a continuous decrease in pressure within the deep piezometer due to continuous nearby by pumping. The mid deep piezometer shows a relatively constant pressure over the last month. Alta 9 was showing an increase in pressure from December to January, due to periods of non-pumping and as of mid-January, has sheared and is no longer functional. Chart 3, on the following page, provides a comparison of piezometric surfaces in monitoring well Alta-8 with average movement velocities of the 12 closest GPS monitoring points to Alta-8. • An abrupt decline in pressure for the middle piezometer in Alta-8 occurred around May 1, 2025, after DDW's 24, 26, 27 and 28 came online (with DDW-16B and 25 already online), and there was an accompanying decrease in movement velocity as of the May 1st GPS readings. Similarly, there is a strong correlation observed between the decline in pressure for the shallow piezometer, and decrease in movement velocity, particularly notable around the middle of March 2025 but then significantly dropping around the beginning of July when DDW-29 came online. DDW29 went offline on October 10 due to a generator issue, and there is an immediate response seen, with rising pressure for both the shallow and 17 Al TA 9: ·25.5' (DEPTH 180') ALTA8 ••1 6' (DEPTH 125') JU E I I I + i I I I T I ! I I I t I I ! I I I r ACLAD PIEZOMETER +- SEPT MBER OCT ER NOYE BER NOTE: SOLID LINES NEAR PUMPING WELLS DASHED LIN ES NO PUMPING WELLS +- +- CECE BER JAN ARY 2026 ACLAD MID DEEP PIEZOMETER-JANUARY 2026 RAN CHO PALOS VER DES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA DRAWN B'Y: LP 0.-.TE: JANUARY 2026 JOB NO.: SR25.1021 middle piezometers in Alta-8, until the pumping was restarted on October 22, after which piezometric levels began to fall again. This is a clear indication that DDW29 is reducing groundwater levels (expressed as pressure) in multiple aquifers that do not appear to be hydraulically connected, but are both penetrated by the monitoring well as well as the dewatering well. This has cut the landslide movement velocity by about 50% since April of this year. • Based upon review of Figure 4, the piezometric surface for the middle Alta-8 piezometer in this area (Altamira landslide uphill from the ACL) appears to flatten and tick upward in response to the early season rainfall, indicating a greater hydraulic connection (less lag time) with rainfall recharge. It also shows a fairly consistent correlation with the accelerating landslide movement rate. This piezometric surface is confined and elevated above the piezometric surface of the shallower piezometer, which has continued to generally fall in response to pumping of nearby ACLAD DDW’s. • The City’s consultants continue to review these important data to evaluate dewatering effectiveness and pumping program refinements. Chart 3: Piezometric Levels in Monitoring Well Alta-8 vs. Landslide Movement Rate for 12 Closest GPS monitoring points ACLAD Winterization Status ACLAD completed winterization of the culvert conveying Altamira Canyon under PVDS and winterization of Lower Altamira Canyon using City loan funds and a City financial contribution not to exceed $200,000. 18 33!1 ::no :no 305 Pi ezom etri c Surfaces o f Alta-8 and Horizonta l Movement Velodties of Nearby GPS Monitoring Points With J\Cl ,t\D JJDW Start l),1te, m,d O th er Events -+-Alta-8 shallow (277.5') -+-Alta-8 middle (227.-5') -Avg. H or i:t:.. M vmt Velocity (12 closest CPS points) I D □W-16BStarts Dat e 1.90 1.70 0.30 0.10 g :a; KCLAD Update Following is the status of KCLAD’s activities as of January 21, 2026. The locations of KCLAD dewatering wells can be found in the August 19, 2025 City Council Staff Report (Attachment H). • Following is the KCLAD well operational status and production: o KCLAD Wells #3 (shallow): not operational. o KCLAD Well #4 (shallow): water depth at 24 feet; pumping rate at 10 gallons per minute. o KCLAD Well #5: pump depth at 144 feet; water depth at 124 feet; pumping rate at 78 gallons per minute. o KCLAD Well #6: pump depth at 154 feet; and a water depth of 122 feet, is temporarily offline due to low water levels. o KCLAD Well #7: pump depth at 175 feet; water depth at 142 feet; pumping rate at 266 gallons per minute. • Weekly readings are uploaded to the KCLAD website (KCGHAD.org). KCLAD and Staff continue to coordinate on drainage and winterization efforts related to receiving flow from Klondike Canyon. Utility Updates Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) Following are SoCalGas updates since the December 16, 2025 staff report (Attachment F): • There is no new update from the last report. All homes in Seaview and PBBC that have taken the necessary steps to receive gas service may make a request to SoCalGas for restoration of service. At this time, there is no indication when gas service will be restored in the PBCA. Southern California Edison (SCE) Following are SCE updates since the December 16, 2025 City Council Staff Report (Attachment F): • SCE has re-energized 79 homes and 2 KCLAD meters for dewatering wells in the PBBC. There are 13 homes in the PBBC and Seaview communities that remain without power. • In the PBBC and Seaview neighborhoods, SCE will re-energize the remaining homes on a weekly basis upon successful completion of electrical inspection. Sanitary Sewer – Portuguese Bend Community The City continues to make repairs to the Abalone Cove Sanitary Sewer System (Ab Cove Sewer) as line breaks or pump malfunctions are discovered. 19 Sanitary Sewer – Seaview Neighborhood There are currently no activities related to the Seaview Sanitary sewer as there has been no detectable land movement for many months. Sanitary Sewer – Portuguese Bend Beach Club (PBBC) There are currently no activities to report for the privately owned PBBC sanitary sewer. Sanitary Sewer – PVDS Trunk Lines There are currently no activities related to the PVDS sanitary sewer trunk lines. California Water Service (Cal Water) Following are Cal Water updates since the December 16, 2025 City Council Staff Report (Attachment F): • Relocation of Vanderlip Pressure Regulator o Construction was completed in January. • Cal Water Smart Meters Program o Over the next few months, Cal Water will be replacing customers’ water meters with smart meters. The smart meters have digital display registers to help quickly identify potential customer-side leaks, and allow customers to monitor their water use online. o Survey to replace the existing meters is currently under way. Communications There are no new Communications updates since the December 16, 2025 City Council Staff Report (Attachment F). Financial Update FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget – Expenditures On June 17, 2025, the City Council adopted the FY 2025-26 Budget which includes $17.75 million of Portuguese Bend Landslide projects, as summarized in the Fiscal Impact section (page 2 of the report). Of this amount, almost $13.7 million is funded by the CIP Fund and $4 million from Special Revenue (Restricted) Funds. Additionally, the FY 2025-26 budget includes $860,000 for property tax assessment fees paid to KCLAD and ACLAD, funded by the General Fund. On September 16, 2025, the City Council approved a revised budget reflecting the current assessment of field conditions and a reassessment of the proposed winterization projects. This reduced the budget by $2.17 million, resulting in a revised budget of $16.4 million. On December 16, 2025, as part of the FY 2024-25 year-end report, the City Council approved approximately $1.45 million of carryover funds from the emergency stabilization measures started in FY 2024-25 but not completed by June 30, 2026. Based on the 20 revised budget and carryover funds, the revised budget in FY 2025-26 is now approximately $17.9 million. As of January 20, 2026, $5.1 million (28%) has been spent and $5.2 million (30%) encumbered, for a combined total of $10.3 million (58%) of the total revised budget. The actual expenditures increased $1.7 million (53%) since December. The breakdown by fund is as follows: • CIP Fund: o $3.28 million in expenditures and $3.7 million encumbered, which is 54% of the revised budget of $13 million (Table 3). • Special Revenue Funds: o $921,432 in expenditures and $1.6 encumbered, for a total of 61% of the revised budget of $4.1 million (Table 4). • General Fund: o $860,300 in expenditures, equal to100% of the budget (Table 5). Table 3: PB Landslide - FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget and YTD – CIP Fund [CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] Program Object Code Funding Source: Capital Infrastructure Program (CIP) Fund 330 FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget FY 2025-26 Revised Budget 01/20/26 Expenditures ($) Encumbered ($) YTD Spent & Encumbered (%) Balance 8202 8001, 8005,8006 ,8802 Abalone Cove Sanitary Sewer Repair Program 3,000,000 3,000,000 289,941 196,389 16%2,513,670 8304 8001,8003 Portuguese Bend Landslide Remediation 700,000 530,000 126,610 332,684 87%70,706 8307 8802 Construction 5,750,000 4,633,686 1,968,899 1,228,373 69%1,436,414 8001,8005 ,8006 Soft Costs (Engineering, Environmental, Inspection, Management 1,725,000 3,002,089 890,016 679,424 52%1,432,649 8308 8802 Portuguese Bend Landslide Remediation - Deep Dewatering Wells 1 thru 6 Permanent Power (City's Federal Match) 525,000 525,000 0 0 0%525,000 8309 8001 Portuguese Bend Landslide Hydrology & Hydraulics Study 1,400,000 1,265,000 0 1,265,000 100%0 *REVISED BUDGET: 12/16/25 - CC approved $1.45M increase from the FY 2024-25 carryover funds for ongoing projects. TOTAL - FY 2025-26 (CIP FUND)$13,100,000 $12,955,775 $3,275,466 $3,701,870 54% $5,978,439 Portuguese Bend Landslide Remediation - Emergency Stabilization Measures 21 Table 4: PB Landslide - FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget and YTD – Special Revenue Funds Table 5: PB Landslide - FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget – General Fund FY 2025-26 Projected Fund Balance – CIP Fund Overall, the FY 2025-26 projected CIP fund balance is $8.5 million, net of reserves (Table 6). This projection incorporates the draft year-end results, as well as the actions approved by the City Council on September 16, 2025, October 7, 2025, and December 16, 2025 including: • A $2.1 million reduction in expenditures approved on September 16, 2025; • A $4 million increase in revenues from the Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 2 approved on October 7, 2025; • The deferral of ACLAD and KCLAD loan payments from December 2025 to December 2026, totaling $342,900. • A $1.45 million increase from carryover of unspent funds from FY 2024-25 for the emergency stabilization measures that were not completed by June 30,2026. Program Object Code Fund Sources: Special Revenue (Restricted) Funds FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget FY 2025-26 Revised Budget 01/20/26 Expenditures ($) Encumbered ($) YTD Spent & Encumbered (%) Balance 8302 8001, 8006, 8802 SB-1 Gas Tax (Fund 204)750,000 750,000 306,337 443,663 100%0 8802 Prop C (Fund 215)1,150,000 1,150,000 404,205 745,795 100%0 8802 Measure R (Fund 220)600,000 600,000 210,890 389,110 100%0 8308 8001, 8005, 8006, 8802 Federal Grant (Fund 331)1,575,000 1,575,000 0 0 0%1,575,000 TOTAL - FY 2025-26 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $4,075,000 $4,075,000 $921,432 $1,578,568 61% $1,575,000 Palos Verdes Drive South Landslide Repair Program $2,500,000 Portuguese Bend Landslide Remediation - Deep Dewatering Wells 1 thru 6 Permanent Power Program Object Code Fund Sources: Special Revenue (Restricted) Funds FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget FY 2025-26 Revised Budget 01/20/26 Expenditures ($)Balance 3150 4901 Property Tax Assessments KCLAD 475,902 475,902 475,902 0 ACLAD 384,398 384,398 384,398 0 $860,300 $860,300 $860,300 $0 TOTAL - FY 2025-26 General Fund 22 Table 6: FY 2025-26 CIP Fund – Projected Restricted Fund Balance Capital Infrastructure Program (CIP)Fund FY 2025-26 CIP Fund FY 2024-25 YE DRAFT FY 2025-26 Revised Budget Beginning Fund Balance 29,592,534 20,258,552 Revenues Interest Earnings 1,304,267 350,000 Grants - LA County Supervisor Hahn 2,200,000 580,000 Grants - LA County Flood Control - 2,000,000 Grants - LA County Sanitation District No. 2 (NEW 10-07-25)- 4,000,000 Total Projected Revenues 3,504,267 6,930,000 Expenditures Emergency Stabilization Measures (Maintenance - Landslide) (FY 25-26 REVISED 09-16-25 LOWERED BY $2.1M)(6,673,396) (7,635,775) Stabilization Measures (Capital - Landslide)(16,480,355) (5,320,000) Other Capital Projects (1,353,810) (4,132,704) Personnel for Capital Programs (1) (35,752) (230,000) Ladera Loan Payment (889,500) (889,500) Total Estimated Expenditures (25,432,815) (18,207,979) Other Sources - Transfers Transfers-In: General Fund (Annual TOT minus public safety cumulative increases)4,126,415 3,867,000 Transfers-In: General Fund (Additional - Ladera Loan)889,500 889,500 Transfers-In: General Fund (Additional - Prior Year's Unallocated Balance )1,178,650 396,650 Transfers-In: General Fund (Additional - Approved 10/1/2024 for Landslide)6,400,000 - Total Estimated Transfers 12,594,565 5,153,150 Projected Ending Fund Balance 20,258,552 14,133,723 Less: City Council Reserve Policy (5,000,000) (5,000,000) PO Carryovers (approved projects but not completed by June 30, 2025)(691,871) 691,871 Continuing Appropriations (approved projects but not completed by June 30, 2025)(2,209,708) 1,448,775 Continuing Appropriation from GF (LA County Grant Balance to CIP Fund)580,000 580,000 Loans to Districts (ACLAD and KCLAD)* (3,527,500) (3,527,500) Projected Restricted Balance 9,409,473 8,326,869 *In accordance with governmental accounting standards, KCLAD and ACLAD loans are recorded as loans issued, with corresponding receivables recognized and scheduled for collection over the next 10 years.* 23 ACLAD/KCLAD Loans $3,527,500 On August 20, 2024, the City received signed loan agreements from ACLAD and KCLAD in the amounts of $1.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively. As of April 3, 2025, both loans have been fully disbursed, totaling $3.52 million, in accordance with the loan agreements. The loans have a 12-year term with a 2.5% interest rate, and the first estimated payment is scheduled for December 2026. Per the agreements, the funds will be used to stabilize land movement, including the installation of dewatering and monitoring wells, system improvements, surface drainage enhancements, grading, and infilling of fractures. Tables 8a and 8b on the following page is a summary of expenditures that were used for the loan ending July 2025. Financial information was provided by the districts. As of January 15, 2026, ACLAD has spent $1,585,547 or 98% of the total loan amount, with an available balance of $24,453 (Table 7a). Majority of the loan amount (94%) was used for the new well maintenance and its operations. Of the 94% in well maintenance, 72% were used for well drilling and pumps, 22% for well service and parts. The remaining expenses are from power utilities, propane, diesel, and generators. ACLAD also spent $137,860 on surface drainage work, of which the City reimbursed $94,500 for Lower Altamira Canyon Winterization work, as part of the winterization budget approved by the City Council in September. In accordance with the loan agreement, no expenditure was made on legal services. Legal service expenses incurred by ACLAD were paid from their annual operating budget. [CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] 24 Table 7a: ACLAD – Summary of Deposits and Expenditures for the City Loan of $1,610,000 For the KCLAD loan, as of January 15, 2026, total spent is $1,137,297 or 59% of the loan, with available balance of $780,203 (Table 7b). This is an increase of $111,847 or 11% since last reported in December 2025. The majority of the loan amount (83%) was used for dewatering programs including well maintenance and operations. Of this amount, 74% was used for well pipeline maintenance and 9% was for well drilling expenses. Approximately 4% were used for contract services for consulting and geology, 8% for extraordinary repairs, and another 6% for utility related expenses. In accordance with the loan agreement, no expenditure was made on legal services. Any legal service expenses incurred by KCLAD were paid from their annual operating budget. [CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] ACLAD City Loan $1,610,000 Total by Category January 15, 2026 Category of Dewatering Program Deposits Payments Reimbur- sements Spent by Category (%) City Loan 1,610,000 0 Surface Drainage Reimbursement (City)0 94,500 Admin: Office Supplies 156 0% Bank Fees & Service Charges 5 0% Power Utilities, Propane, SCE, Diesel, Generators, Parts 57,254 4% Surface Drainage 43,360 -94,500 3% Well Drilling and Pumps 1,141,196 72% Well Maintenance - Service & Parts 343,576 22% Grand Total $1,610,000 1,585,547 Total Spent (%)98% Loan Balance $24,453 *The above expenses are in addition to the KCLAD's regular annual maintenance and operational costs* 25 Table 7b: KCLAD – Summary of Deposits and Expenditures for the City Loan of $1,917,500 2. Disaster Cost Recovery - Obligated Funds Obligated Funds from FEMA ($574,335 as of January 2026): In July 2025, FEMA informed staff that the reimbursement request for protective measures and debris removal, totaling approximately $596,000, has been approved and forwarded to CalOES to initiate the funding process. Staff continued to coordinate with both FEMA and CalOES to expedite the payments. Subsequently on October 10, 2025, FEMA notified the City that approximately $574,400 has been obligated and forwarded to CalOES for the reimbursement process. On January 5, 2026, CalOES sent the City a Notification of Obligation and Payment for Public Assistance and CDAA Grants Program FEMA-4769 (Attachment J). On January 26, 2026, the City received the first payment of $447,044, as shown on the following page: [CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] KCLAD City Loan $1,917,500 Total by Category January 15, 2026 Category of Dewatering Program Deposits Payments Spent by Category (%) City Loan 1,917,500 Admin: Consulting 18,961 2% Admin: Geology Consulting 25,698 2% Admin: Board Expenses 132 0% Bank Charges & Fees 159 0% Extraordinary Repair 88,000 8% Utilities - SCE, Cal Water, Generator 63,526 6% Well Drilling Expense 102,324 9% Well Maintenance - Pipeline Maint.838,496 74% Grand Total $1,917,500 $1,137,297 Total Spent (%)59% Loan Balance $780,203 *The above expenses are in addition to the KCLAD's regular annual maintenance and operational costs* 26 Obligated Funds from FEMA – Public Assistance from Winter Storms (Jan. 31, 2024 - Feb. 9, 2024) At the time the budget was developed, the timing of the Public Assistance funds had not been finalized and was not incorporated into the FY 2025-26 budget. Staff now request City Council approval to appropriate the revenue of $574,400 in the CIP Fund and General Fund based on the Notification of Obligation and payments received to date. These funds would reimburse the expenses submitted to CalOES related to the landslide that were charged in the CIP Fund and General Fund. 3. Bicycle, Motorcycle, Unicycle and Other Similar Wheeled Vehicle Prohibition The City Council is being asked to extend the existing resolution prohibiting one- or two- wheeled vehicles on PVDS for an additional 60 days (Attachment A). Since the City Council’s declaration of a local emergency, the City Geologist has been regularly reviewing survey data and conducting field observations of PVDS in the Landslide Complex. While the City’s Geologist reports the rate of land movement has slowed, there remain areas of PVDS where land movement is nearly two inches per week. Overall, pavement conditions on PVDS remain very poor, with cracks, bumps, fissures, and other irregularities. Deformations in the pavement can occur overnight. Although four-wheeled vehicles (i.e. cars) can, with due care, navigate the road when it is open, the impact on one- and two-wheeled vehicles remains pronounced. Despite the added signs prohibiting bicyclists, motorcyclists, unicycles and other similar wheeled devices from traversing the landslide, there remain those who ignore the prohibition at their peril. Were the City Council to consider ending the current prohibition, the Office of the City Attorney remains of the considered legal opinion that permitting one- or two- wheeled vehicle traffic across the landslide will pose a liability risk to the City and that the AGENCY COST RECOVERY TYPE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION REQUESTED AMOUNT APPROVED AMOUNT (75% FEDERAL SHARE) PAYMENT STATUS FEMA Public Assistance (City) #753367 (Damage #1386237) Category B - Emergency Protective Measures Emergency protective measures - tarps, security by means of signage indicating flooded and closed streets, flood fighting through emergency pumping and sandbagging, emergency Repairs of damaged roofs and broken pipes, and mold remediation. Amount approved is is 75% of $465,902 minus insurance reduction of $24K. $465,902 $330,911 Received payment of $330,911 on 1/26/26 FEMA Public Assistance (City) #750192 (Damage # 1380157) Category A - Debris Removal The debris included vegetative, mud and dirt debris, in storm drains and on improved public property and public rights-of way, throughout the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. $148,619 $111,464 Received payment of $111,464 on 1/26/26 FEMA (partially approved for $102,157.16) Public Assistance (City) #754844 (Damage # 1385919) Category C- Road and Bridges Facility 4 (intersection of Rue De La Fleur and Rue De La Pierre) is eligible for $102,157.16 and demonstrated the claimed work is a result of the declared incident. $136,210 $102,157 FEMA Management Costs Category 2 - Management Costs Approved Administration Costs (5%)$29,803 Received partial of $4,668.74 payment on 1/26/26 TOTAL COST RECOVERY - APPROVED $750,730 $574,335 $447,044 27 same is not presently safe for these vehicles to travel on PVDS, even using due care, across the landslide for the reasons noted above. 4. Extension of the Local Emergency Declaration The City Council is being asked to adopt the attached resolution thereby extending the Declaration of Local Emergency by 60 days (Attachment B). On October 3, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-47 declaring a local emergency. The emergency declaration is deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council in accordance with law. Government Code § 8630 requires the City Council to review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days until the City Council determines the local emergency within the geographic boundaries of the Landslide Complex has been abated or mitigated to insignificance. The City Council has extended the local emergency on multiple occasions within the 60- day window and it remains in effect until February 14, 2026, unless extended again this evening. At this time, the City Council is being asked to extend the local emergency declaration an additional 60 days through April 4, 2026 which does not require a public hearing. If extended this evening, the Council would consider renewing the local emergency declaration again during the next landslide update on March 24, 2026. 5. Extension of the Local Emergency Declaration for Utility Shutoffs The City Council is being asked to adopt the attached resolution thereby extending the Declaration of Local Emergency due to a severe and sudden energy shortage by 60 days (Attachment C). On August 6, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-52 declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off natural gas service to approximately 135 homes in the PBCA due to safety concerns. On September 3, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-57, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned de-energization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC neighborhoods. The emergency declaration is deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council in accordance with law. Government Code § 8630 requires the City Council to review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days until the City Council determines the local emergency because of a severe energy shortage has been abated or mitigated to insignificance. The City Council has extended the local emergency declaration for utility shutoffs on multiple occasions within the 60-day window and it remains in effect until February 14, 2026, unless extended again this evening. At this time, the City Council is being asked to extend the local emergency declaration an additional 60 days through April 4, 2026, which does not require a public hearing. If extended this evening, the Council would consider renewing the local emergency declaration again during the next landslide update on March 24, 2026. 28 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Continuing the Emergency Work and Emergency Contract As a separate item on tonight’s agenda, the City Council is being provided with an update on the Portuguese Bend Landslide Emergency construction contracting and being asked to reconfirm the need to continue the emergency work. This is a recurring agenda matter and requires a 4/5th vote. Hydrology & Hydraulics Study Update On October 13, 2025, the City’s consultant, Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec), started work on a comprehensive hydrology and hydraulics study of the Landslide Complex. The general scope of the study is the following: • Develop a Hydrology and Hydraulics (H&H) model for the entire Landslide Complex watershed that incorporates storm patterns from the last ten years, with future rainfall data collection to field validate the model. • Prepare planning level concepts for alternatives to reduce stormwater infiltration into the Landslide Complex including schematic layouts, cost opinions, real estate needs, utility impacts, and permit requirements. • Conduct a subsurface conditions study of the PBL to characterize primary groundwater flow paths and geologic conduits. Geosyntec continues conducting the preliminary watershed demarcation, including assessing contributing areas upstream of the Landslide Complex, and processing historical rainfall data for inclusion in the study model. A draft watershed map is scheduled to be available for the next Landslide Complex update to the City Council in March 2026. Overall, the hydrology and hydraulics study remains generally on schedule to be completed in approximately four months, with rainfall data collection continuing for approximately three years thereafter. Temporary Overnight Full Closure of Palos Verdes Drive South (PVDS) To conduct part of the subsurface conditions study of the PBL and characterize primary groundwater flow paths and geologic conduits; a temporary overnight full closure of PVDS is necessary to allow the City’s contractor to collect data in and around PVDS without noise and vibrations interfering with data collection. A full closure of PVDS is scheduled for three consecutive nights from Wednesday, February 11 to Friday, February 13 between 8pm and 6am. Public Safety (Los Angeles County Fire Department and Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department have been notified). The City has begun advanced notification of the temporary road closures including residences, homeowners associations, and surrounding business such as Terranea Resort and Trump National Golf Club 29 Disaster Cost Recovery Applications Update (FEMA and CalOES) As previously noted in the prior reports, in response to the declared federal disaster for the winter storms that occurred between January 31 and February 9, 2024, and the Governor’s state of emergency for the indefinite de-energization of power, the City tabulated the costs it incurred through September 12, 2024 for reimbursement consideration by FEMA and CalOES, which total $61.4 million. Of this amount, $39.4 million is public assistance (City) and $22 million of individual assistance (residents). According to FEMA and CalOES, natural disaster recovery funds will not be provided for landslide remediation efforts because it is considered “pre-existing.” Out of the $39.4 million application for public assistance (City), Staff is projecting only approximately $1.5 million in potential disaster recovery funds from the Winter Storm and Energy Shutoff. If deemed eligible, the reimbursement process could take anywhere from one to three years before the City receives the funds. In January 2025, the City received seven denial letters from FEMA, followed by an additional denial letter on February 25, 2025, for a total of $37.9 million. For the $22 million individual assistance (IA) application that the City submitted on behalf of the residents, the City has been notified that these funds will not become available. On March 17, 2025, pursuant to the Stafford Act and Code of Federal Regulations, the City filed appeals of the first seven denial letters, and on April 25, 2025, the City filed a remaining eighth appeal letter. The appeals are heard by FEMA’s District 9 Administrator, Robert Fenton, and his decision is then appealable to FEMA’s Headquarters in Washington D.C. Projects Denied from FEMA ($37,775,258 as of January 2026) On October 10, 2025 (dated October 3, 2025), the City received a response to the appeal letters from FEMA Regional Administrator Robert Fenton, denying the City’s appeals for $37.77 million. The denial was based on the following determinations: • Applicant did not demonstrate the claimed work required as a result of the declared disaster. • Due to pre-existing instability, permanent repairs are not eligible. • Applicant did not demonstrate there was an immediate threat that required emergency protective measures. • Several facilities are ineligible for public assistance funding. • Applicant did not demonstrate the claimed work required as a result of the declared disaster. • Due to pre-existing instability, permanent repairs are not eligible. • Facility 1 (PVDS between Schooner Dr and Seacove Dr), Facilities 2 and 3 (two locations on Hawthorne Blvd.) are under the authority of another Federal agency. On December 1, 2025, the City filed an appeal of District No. 9 Administrator Mr. Robert Fenton’s denial to FEMA Headquarters. A copy of the appeal is available on the City website at the following link: 30 https://www.rpvca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/24009/December-1-2025-FEMA-Appeal- Letter-PDF On January 16, 2026, Cal OES responded to the City’s appeal letters by forwarding a recommendation to FEMA indicating that it does not support the City’s appeal, following its review and analysis under applicable laws and regulations. FEMA has 120 days to render a final decision. Copies of the correspondence are included in Attachment I. [CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] 31 Projects Denied from FEMA – Public Assistance from Winter Storms (Jan. 31, 2024 - Feb. 9, 2024) It should be noted that both ACLAD and KCLAD filed appeals as well for the denials they received for disaster recovery assistance. Both ACLAD and KCLAD received notification from CalOES that they will not be recommending overturning the denial to Mr. Fenton. Both ACLAD and KCLAD received similar notifications that their appeals were denied by AGENCY COST RECOVERY TYPE CATEGORY DESCRIP- TION DENIAL REASON FROM FEMA Dated January 17 & 24, 2025 DENIAL REASON FROM FEMA Dated October 3, 2025 for the City's First Appeal submitted on April 25, 2025 REQUESTED AMOUNT FEMA Public Assistance (City) #754845 Category D - Water Control Facilities Lanslide - Drainage (1) Damage not directly caused by the severe winter storms; (2) Facilities were unstable based on pre-disaster evidence. (1) Applicant did not demonstrate the claimed work was required as a result of the declared disaster; (2) Due to pre-existing instability, permanent repairs are not eligible; (3) Applicant did not demonstrate there was an immediate threat that required emergency protective measures; and (4) Several facilities are ineligible for public assistance funding. $200,000 FEMA Public Assistance (City) #754846 Category F - Utilities Landslide Utilities (1) Damage not directly caused by the severe winter storms; (2) Facilities were unstable based on pre-disaster evidence. same as above $3,000,000 FEMA Public Assistance (City) #753361 Category B - Emergency Protective Measures PVDS Temporary Civil Repairs (1) Damage not directly caused by the severe winter storms; (2) Roads ineligible because another Federal Agency is legally responsible for the repairs and maintenance of the roads; (3) Emergency work claimed is due to an existing unstable landslide. same as above $5,375,000 FEMA Public Assistance (City) #753364 Category B - Emergency Protective Measures PB Landslide Stabilizati on and Monitorin g (1) Work claimed is not required as a result of the declared disaster; (2) Facility (slopes, canyons, hilldsides) is an ineligible unimproved natural feature; (3) Existing unstable landslide. same as above $9,000,000 FEMA Public Assistance (City) #754843 Category C - Utilities Landslide Roads (1) Work claimed is not required as a result of the declared disaster; (2) Facility were unstable based on pre-disaster evidence. same as above $11,635,000 FEMA Public Assistance (City) #754842 Category G - Parks, Recreational Facilities, and Other Items Damages at Portugues e Bend Trails, (1) Work claimed is not required as a result of the declared disaster; (2) Facility were unstable based on pre-disaster evidence. same as above $3,231,000 FEMA Public Assistance (City) #730185 Category G - Parks, Recreational Facilities, and Other Items Peppertre e, Burma Road X Rim Trails (1) Work claimed is not required as a result of the declared disaster; (2) Facility were unstable based on pre-disaster evidence. (1) Applicant did not demonstrate the claimed work was required as a result of the declared disaster; and (2) Due to pre-existing instability, permanent repairs are not eligible. $11,415 FEMA (partially approved for $102,157.16) Public Assistance (City) #754844 Category C- Road and Bridges Palos Verde Drive South - Schooner and Seacove (1) Work claimed has not been demonstrated that the repair is a result of the declared disaster; (2) Roads ineligible because another Federal Agency is legally responsible for the repairs and maintenance of the roads; (1) Facility 1 (PVDS between Schooner Dr and Seacove Dr), Facilities 2 & 3 (two locations on Hawthorne Blvd.) are under the authority of another Federal agency; and (2) Facility 4 (intersection of Rue De La Fleur and Rue De La Pierre) is eligible for $102,157.16 and demonstrated the claimed work is a result of the declared incident. *Original request is for $5,425,000 and only partially approved for $102,157.16. $5,322,843 TOTAL COST RECOVERY - DENIED $37,775,258 32 District No. 9 Administrator Mr. Bob Fenton. ACLAD and KCLAD collaborated with the City and filed a second and final appeal to FEMA Headquarters which are pending review similar to the City. FEMA Voluntary Property Acquisition Buyout Program On October 28, 2024, the City, FEMA and Cal OES announced a $42 million Voluntary Property Acquisition Buyout Program (Buyout Program) for property owners in the Landslide Complex whose homes have been damaged or threatened by land movement. Established with funding from FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), which is a grant not disaster assistance, the Buyout Program is intended to help eligible homeowners relocate to safer areas by offering fair market value for their properties based on pre-disaster appraisals. Properties acquired by the City through this Buyout Program will be permanently converted to open space and deed-restricted, protecting the community from future redevelopment risks in these vulnerable areas. The City received 85 applications for the first round of program funding. After reviewing eligibility and determining estimated costs for the prioritized properties based on the program guidelines, the City has determined funding will be available for buyouts of 22 properties (15 red-tagged, and 7 yellow-tagged) in the first round of program funding. All remaining eligible applications will be considered for any future rounds of program funding. Appraisals were completed at the beginning of May 2025. On May 12, 2025, Property owners received a copy of the appraisal and were provided the opportunity to appeal it. As well, the City collected additional required forms and information for the program from the 23 program properties in order to complete the response to FEMA’s Request for Information (RFI) that was due on June 27, 2025. On June 2, 2025, one of the property owners withdrew from the program. After reviewing the appraisal information for the remaining 22 program properties and updating the application budget as part of the RFI response, the first round funding would only be able to fund the acquisition of the remaining 22 program properties. City staff is working as quickly as possible to move through this lengthy and complex process, which involves multiple levels of close review by FEMA. Each property must be carefully vetted for compliance with program rules and regulations. In anticipation of the FEMA grant award, the City issued a request for proposals to hire a qualified FEMA Project and Grant Manager with expertise in working with the intricate requirements of FEMA and HMGP. The City Council awarded this contract at its meeting on October 7, 2025. By engaging a project manager with FEMA and Hazard Mitigation expertise and understanding the processes and timelines associated with FEMA grant administration, will ensure compliance with the guidelines issued by the HMGP funds for the Program and help ensure that we are processing applications as quickly as possible for residents. There is not a definitive timeline for when the first of the 22 properties may be purchased. The City is still in the “pre-award” phase of the grant process with FEMA. Once the City is formally awarded the grant, which could happen in at least several months from now, the $42 million will come in installments, likely on a quarterly basis, which is standard 33 practice. The City will receive these payments as reimbursements only after the transactions are completed in batches. For cash flow purposes, the program does not provide advance payments. As such, staff anticipates that approximately $10 million will be needed during the initial phase of awards to support the program while awaiting reimbursements. The Voluntary Property Buyout Program is funded by FEMA’s HMGP. This is different from FEMA’s Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program, which was recently ended by the federal government and may result in the City losing funding for a separate grant for the Portuguese Bend Landslide (PBL) Remediation project. FEMA has issued a second Request for Information (RFI) to receive additional clarification on the application materials, including information on staging and access routes, vegetation and tree removal, extent of ground disturbance, regrading expectations, handling of utilities during demolition, demolition schedules, cultural resources, and building and county assessor records. City staff is working to complete the response to the RFI by the required January 30, 2026 deadline. The City has also submitted a rolling application for additional HMGP funding in order to potentially offer more rounds of the buyout program. CONCLUSION: The City, ACLAD, and KCLAD dewatering well programs are currently operating six, 15 and three dewatering wells, respectively. The City pumped at a rate of approximately 21 million gallons in December 2025, which is generally lower than the prior months due to sheared wells. ACLAD pumped approximately 4.3 million gallons in December 2025, which is consistent with the November total and is a decrease from prior months due to rain event interruptions. KCLAD pumped at an average rate of approximately 13 million gallons per month, which is consistent with the prior month. City winterization of Upper Altamira Canyon is substantially complete with site clean-up and erosion control measure remaining. Portuguese Canyon winterization is also substantially complete, as is the winterization of additional areas recommended by Staff within the City Council approve budget. ACLAD winterization of the Palos Verdes Drive South culvert and Lower Altamira Canyon is complete using City loan funds and a City financial contribution not to exceed $200,000. Overall, winterization measures performed as expected during the December rain events. The ACL accelerated an average of 18.1% to approximately 2.15 inches per week from November 4, 2025 to January 8, 2026; which means the current movement rate is approximately 17 times the October 2022 pre-deep slip plane activation rate. The PBL accelerated an average of 20.8% to approximately 1.38 inches per week from November 4, 2025 to January 8, 2026; which means the current movement rate is approximately 8 times the October 2022 pre-deep slip plane activation rate. The KCL continues to show no measurable movement. As of January 20, 2026, a total of $10.3 million or 58% of the total revised budget of $17.9 million for FY 2025-26 has been spent or encumbered, including $5.1 million (28%) spent 34 and $5.2 million (30%) encumbered. This is an increase of $1.7 million (+53%) since the last report in December 2025. Based on currently available data, Staff recommends extending the local state of emergency and prohibition of one- and two-wheeled vehicles along Palos Verdes Drive South through the Landslide Complex. ALTERNATIVES: In addition to Staff recommendation, the following alternative actions are available for the City Council’s consideration: 1. Take no action, and receive and file this report. 2. Do not extend the temporary prohibition of one- or two-wheeled vehicles on PVDS and allow one- and two-wheeled to begin using PVDS again. 3. Do not adopt one, or both, of the resolutions continuing the local emergency declarations. 35 01203.0023/1027433.1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CONTINUING THE LOCAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 2023-47 ADOPTED ON OCTOBER 3, 2023 FOR AN ADDITIONAL 60 DAY PERIOD WHEREAS, on October 3, 2023, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution No. 2023-47, declaring a local state of emergency because of the alarming increase of land movement in the Greater Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex, as depicted in Resolution No. 2023-47 Exhibits “A” and “B”. Resolution No. 2023-47, and the exhibits thereto, is incorporated by reference; WHEREAS, on October 3, 2023, the City Council by a 4/5 vote also adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 674U, establishing a moratorium on all construction in the Landslide Complex; WHEREAS, on November 14, 2023, the City Council by a 4/5 vote adopted Resolution No. 2023-56, extending the state of emergency for an additional 60 days; WHEREAS, on December 19, 2023, the City Council by a 4/5 vote adopted Resolution No. 2023-61, extending the state of emergency for an additional 60 days; WHEREAS, on February 6, 2024, the City Council by a 4/5 vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-05, extending the state of emergency for an additional 60 days; WHEREAS, on March 19, 2024, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-13, extending the state of emergency for an additional 60 days; WHEREAS, on May 7, 2024, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-20, extending the state of emergency for an additional 60 days; WHEREAS, on July 2, 2024, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-44, extending the state of emergency for an additional 60 days; WHEREAS, on August 6, 2024, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-51, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; WHEREAS, on October 1, 2024, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-50, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-70, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and WHEREAS, on December 17, 2024, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-77, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and A-1 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, on February 4, 2025, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-06, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2025, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-18, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-27, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2025, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-45, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2025, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-61, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2025, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-66, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-81, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and WHEREAS, on December 16, 2025, the City Council by a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-91, extending the state of emergency by an additional 60 days; and WHEREAS, the state of emergency is deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council in accordance with law. Government Code § 8630 requires the City Council to review of the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days until the City Council determines the local emergency within the geographic boundaries of the Landslide Complex has been abated or mitigated to insignificance; and, WHEREAS, after consideration of all facts reasonably available the City Council now desires to extend the declaration of a state of local emergency within the Landslide Complex. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby determines that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporates the same as the findings of the City Council. Section 2. Proclamation of Emergency. The City Council finds, pursuant to RPVMC Chapter 2.24 and Government Code §§ 8630 and 8680.9, there exists an actual condition of peril to the safety of persons and property exiting within the Greater Portuguese Bend Landslide, comprised of the Portuguese Bend Landslide, the Abalone Cove Landslide, and the Klondike Canyon Landslide), as depicted in Exhibits “A” and “B” of Resolution No. 2023-47, and based on the staff report and recommendations and A-2 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 3 of 4 public testimony, and hereby proclaims that a state of local emergency continues to exist throughout the same. Section 3. Authority Granted. It is further proclaimed and ordered that during the existence of said local emergency, the powers, authority, functions and duties of the Disaster Council, Director, and the City’s emergency services organizations shall be those prescribed by State Law, City ordinances, Resolution No. 2023-47 and any other applicable resolutions, and approved plans of the City in order to mitigate the effects of the local emergency. Section 4. Immunity Invoked. To the maximum extent permitted by law, and pursuant to Government Code § 866, the City Council hereby invokes the immunity afforded to the City of Rancho Palos Verds in adopting and implementing the declaration of local emergency within the Landslide Complex Section 5. Duration. The local emergency shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council in accordance with law. Section 6. Continuing Declaration. Government Code § 8630 requires the City Council to review of the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days until the City Council determines the local emergency within Landslide Complex has been abated or mitigated to insignificance. Section 7. Severability. If any subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Resolution or any application of it to any person, structure, gathering, or circumstance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, then such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Resolution. Section 8. Effectiveness. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. A copy of the Proclamation and this Resolution shall be forwarded to the California Emergency Management Agency. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 3rd day of February, 2026. ________________________________ Paul Seo, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES ) A-3 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 4 of 4 I, Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 2026-__ was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on February 3, 2026. ________________________________ Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk A-4 01203.0023/1027441.1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARIES OF THE PORTUGUESE BEND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, PORTUGUESE BEND BEACH CLUB, AND SEAVIEW NEIGHBORHOODS, BASED ON SUDDEN ENERGY SHORTAGES, PLANNED DEENERGIZING EVENTS, AND INTERNET SERVICE SHUT OFFS AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NOS. 2024-52 AND 2024-57 FOR AN ADDITIONAL 60 DAYS WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes is home to four out of five sub-slides that comprise the Greater Portuguese Landslide Complex (Landslide Complex): the Portuguese Bend Landslide, Abalone Cove Landslide, Klondike Canyon Landslide, and Beach Club Landslide. The Portuguese Bend Landslide encompasses the Portuguese Bend Community Association (PBCA), the Seaview Neighborhood (Seaview), and the Portuguese Bend Beach Club (PBBC). The Landslide Complex has been active since the 1950s; WHEREAS, the 2022-2023 rainy season brought exceptional amounts of rain to the region, dumping 20.9” of rain or 190% of the average annual rainfall in the region; WHEREAS, by April 26, 2024, total rainfall for the 2023-24 season (beginning Oct 1, 2023) was 23.01" or 169% of the historical 67-year average of 13.63" for this rain gauge. (All data based on LACDPW Rainfall Gauge No. 1011B at Rolling Hills FS.); WHEREAS, beginning in 2018, but particularly since May 2023, the land movement in the Landslide Complex has increased significantly due to increased rainfall in the last two rainy seasons, which caused the water table to rise dramatically and destabilize the landslides. The City has established, via repeated geologic studies, that a significant factor in the speed of land movement in the Landslide Complex is the amount of water in the soil; WHEREAS, on October 3, 2023, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution No. 2023-47, declaring a local state of emergency due to the alarming increase of land movement in the Landslide Complex. The state of emergency based on the land movement has been extended as required by law and is still active; WHEREAS, on August 6, 2024, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-52, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service to approximately 135 homes in the PBCA due to safety concerns; WHEREAS, on September 3, 2024, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-57, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and B-1 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 2 of 5 severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned de- energization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; WHEREAS, on October 1, 2024, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-61, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-71, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; WHEREAS, on December 17, 2024, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2024-78, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; WHEREAS, on February 4, 2025, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-07, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2025, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-16, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-28, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2025, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-45, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; andWHEREAS, after consideration of all facts reasonably available the City Council now desires to extend the declaration of a state of local emergency within the Landslide Complex; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2025, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-45, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; andWHEREAS, after consideration of all facts reasonably available the City Council now desires to extend the declaration of a state of local emergency within the Landslide Complex; and B-2 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 3 of 5 WHEREAS, on September 16, 2025, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-67, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; and WHEREAS, after consideration of all facts reasonably available the City Council now desires to extend the declaration of a state of local emergency within the Landslide Complex; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-82, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; and WHEREAS, after consideration of all facts reasonably available the City Council now desires to extend the declaration of a state of local emergency within the Landslide Complex. WHEREAS, on December 16, 2025, the City Council by unanimous vote adopted Resolution No. 2025-93, declaring a local state of emergency because of a sudden and severe energy shortage caused by shutting off of natural gas service, planned deenergization events, and internet shut-offs in the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC; and WHEREAS, after consideration of all facts reasonably available the City Council now desires to extend the declaration of a state of local emergency within the Landslide Complex. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby determines that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporates the same as the findings of the City Council. Section 2. Extension of Local State of Emergency. The City Council finds, pursuant to RPVMC Chapter 2.24 and Government Code §§ 8630, 8680.9, and 8558 there exists an actual condition of peril to the safety of persons and property existing within the PBCA, Seaview, and PBBC, as established by Resolutions No. 2024-52 and 2024-57, and based on the staff report and recommendations and public testimony, and hereby proclaims that a state of local emergency continues to exist throughout the same. Section 3. Authority Granted. It is further proclaimed and ordered that during the existence of said local emergency, the powers, authority, functions and duties of the Disaster Council, Director, and the City’s emergency services organizations shall be those prescribed by State Law, City ordinances, Resolution Nos. 2023-52 and 2024-57, and any other applicable resolutions, and approved plans of the City in order to mitigate the effects of the local emergency. Section 4. Immunity Invoked. To the maximum extent permitted by law, and pursuant to Government Code § 866, the City Council hereby invokes the immunity B-3 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 4 of 5 afforded to the City of Rancho Palos Verds in adopting and implementing the declaration of local emergency within the Landslide Complex. Section 5. Duration. The local emergency shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council in accordance with law. Government Code § 8630 requires the City Council to review of the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days until the City Council determines the local emergency within the geographic boundaries of the Landslide Complex has been abated or mitigated to insignificance. Section 6. Continuing Declaration. Government Code § 8630 requires the City Council to review of the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days until the City Council determines the local emergency within the PBCA has been abated or mitigated to insignificance. Section 7. Severability. If any subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Resolution or any application of it to any person, structure, gathering, or circumstance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, then such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Resolution. Section 8. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Resolution is proposed to allow the City to continue to address and mitigate an imminent threat to public health and safety and therefore is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code, Section 21080(b)(4) and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15269. Section 9. Effectiveness. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. A copy of the Proclamation and this Resolution shall be forwarded to the California Office of Emergency Management. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 3rd day of February, 2026. ________________________________ Paul Seo, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES ) B-4 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 5 of 5 I, Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 2026-__ was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on February 3, 2026. ________________________________ Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk B-5 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, EXTENDING FOR A TERM OF SIXTY (60) DAYS THE TEMPORARILY PROHIBITION ON TRAVEL BY UNICYCLES, BICYCLES, MOTORCYCLES, AND OTHER ONE- OR TWO-WHEELED VEHICLES ON PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH WITHIN THE LANDSLIDE COMPLEX DUE TO CONTINUED ROADWAY CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the Greater Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex (the Landslide Complex) encompasses four historically active landslide areas in the City: the Portuguese Bend Landslide (PBL), the Abalone Cove Landslide (ACL), the Klondike Canyon Landslide (KCL), and the Beach Club Landslide (BCL). It also includes the Flying Triangle Landslide (FTL) in the City of Rolling Hills as mapped by various agencies (i.e., U.S. Geological Survey, California Geological Survey) and other researchers; and WHEREAS, following the 2022-23 rainy season, the Landslide Complex’s movement has accelerated exponentially. Therefore, on October 3, 2023, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution No. 2023-047 based on its authority pursuant to Section 8610 et seq. and Section 8630 et seq. of the Government Code, and Chapter 2.23 of the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, declaring a state of local emergency for the Landslide Complex based on the accelerated movement of the land. The declaration of emergency has been renewed as required by law and currently applies; and WHEREAS, following the City Council’s declaration of a local emergency, the City experienced another record-setting rainy season; and WHEREAS, since the City Council’s declaration of a local emergency, the City Geologist, Mike Phipps of Cotton, Shires, and Associates, Inc. (CSA), has been regularly conducting field mapping throughout the Landslide Complex; observing conditions at various locations, and reviewing survey and rainfall data; and WHEREAS, the City Geologist most recently reported to the City Council on May 7, 2024, in summary, that the Landslide Complex continues moving at unprecedented rates, predominantly in response to the two consecutive seasons of significantly above average rainfall; and WHEREAS, the City Geologist stated that land movement continued to manifest at the ground surface in the form of landslide scarps, fissures, grabens/sinkholes, tensional cracking, shear zones and thrust features; and that due to the continued acceleration, the ground movement features have continued to enlarge, expand, widen, or grow depending on the type of feature and location, C-1 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 2 of 4 which also affects Palos Verdes Drive South (PVDS) as it traverses the Landslide Complex area; and WHEREAS, the City Geologist summarized that road conditions on PVDS continue to be adversely impacted due to differential rates of land movement ranging from about 5 to 8 inches per week, at the time of the report to the City Council on May 7, 2024; and WHEREAS, traffic signs on PVDS in the landslide area include various signs warning of the landslide conditions, with some specifically directed at bicyclists and motorcyclists. Out of an abundance of caution, Staff (through a consultant), conducted a review of signs on PVDS. As a result, additional signs were installed, including signs installed on June 1, 2024 specifically directed at bicyclists and motorcyclists; and WHEREAS, despite the existing bicycle warning signs, Staff has been anecdotally informed of bicycle crashes, and at least one claim has been filed against the City (which was prior to the additional bicycle and motorcycle signs installed on June 1) and at least two claims for injury to persons or property have been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, Section 8610 of the Government Code provides the local disaster council with broad powers to “develop plans for meeting any condition constituting a local emergency or state of emergency, including, but not limited to, earthquakes, natural or manmade disasters specific to that jurisdiction, or state of war emergency….”; and WHEREAS, Chapter 2.24 designates the City Council, the director of emergency services, the assistant director of emergency services, and the chiefs of emergency services as the City’s Disaster Council; and WHEREAS, the director of emergency services (the city manager), “[i]n the event of the proclamation of a local emergency […], the director [of emergency services] is empowered: a. To make and issue rules and regulations on matters reasonably related to the protection of life and property as affected by such emergency….”; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that despite consistent and recently increased signage, riders of bicycles and motorcycles continue to use PVDS, and that the land movement is creating frequent localized deviations in the road, which can be navigated safely in cars and trucks, but that are more dangerous for two- wheeled vehicles such as bicycles and motorcycles; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the safety of bicycle, motorcycle and other two-wheeled riders is a compelling interest; and C-2 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 3 of 4 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that in order to further the City’s compelling interest in the safety of riders, it is appropriate to temporarily route bicycles and motorcycles away from the portion of PVDS within the Landslide Complex, until such time as the City may be able to slow the land movement sufficiently to reduce the frequency and severity of road deviations to minimize the risk of injury to persons or property; and WHEREAS, on June 18, 2024, the City Council duly adopted Resolution No. 2024-39 prohibiting, for a period of six (6) months, bicycles, motorcycles, and other two-wheeled vehicles from traversing PVDS with the Landslide Complex; and WHEREAS, the City Council has, since that date and at various City Council meetings, duly adopted resolutions prohibiting for specified periods set forth therein, unicycles, bicycles, motorcycles, and other one- or two-wheeled vehicles from traversing PVDS with the Landslide Complex; and WHEREAS, staff and the Office of the City attorney are of the opinion that conditions on PVDS have not stabilized to the point that this prohibition should be allowed to terminate and is of the further opinion the existing prohibition should be extended for an additional sixty (60) day period. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: For a period of sixty (60) calendar days from and after the date of this resolution, the portion of PVDS within the Landslide Complex shall be closed to unicycle, bicycle, motorcycle, and other one- or two-wheeled vehicle traffic. Section 3: Updates on the rate of movement and repair of PVDS will be provided at City Council meetings where the City Council is considering extending the local state of emergency, including an assessment of the relative safety of traveling on PVDS by unicycles, bicycles, motorcycles, and other one- or two- wheeled vehicles through the Landslide Complex, with the purpose of lifting the prohibition as soon as possible. Section 4: This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption by the City Council upon a majority vote. C-3 Resolution No. 2026-__ Page 4 of 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, California, on this 3rd day of February, 2026. ________________________________ Paul Seo, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________ Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES ) I, Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026-__, was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on February 3, 2026 ________________________________ Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk C-4 0 250 500 1000 (feet) PONY TRAIL PORTUGUESE BEND LANDSLIDE FLYING TRIANGLE LANDSLIDE KLONDIKE CANYON LANDSLIDE ABALONE COVE LANDSLIDE ABALONE COVE PORTUGUESE POINT INSPIRATION POINT SACRED COVE PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH BURMA ROAD EXPLANATION Limits of the Ancient Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex Limits of Historically Mapped Landslides 2023/2024 Landslide Features (based on CSA field mapping) SEAVIEW TRACT Limits of 2023-2024 Major Landslide Movement (based on CSA field mapping and bathymetry survey) LIMITS OF 2023-2024 MAJOR LANDSLIDE MOVEMENT GPS Monument Displacement Rate (November 4, 2025 to December 2, 2025) Displacement Vector Scale 1"= 8"/week Displacement Rate Table Minimum Rate (inch/week) 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 Maximum Rate (inch/week) 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 Color 10.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 1.00 2.00 12.00 13.00 0.00 1.00 APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF ANCIENT PORTUGUESE BEND LANDSLIDE COMPLEX BEACH CLUB LANSDSLIDE DDW-10 DDW-9A DDW-9 DDW-11 DDW-8 DDW-7 DDW-5 DDW-4 DDW-6 DDW-1 DDW-2 DDW-3 WW-3 MW-18 WW-12 WW-13 WW-30 WW-1 WW-6 WW-7 WW-17 WW-11 WW-15 WW-21 UDW-ACLAD-1 KC-1 KC-3 KC-4 KC-6 KC-5 KC-2 KC-7 KC-4A ACLAD 25 ACLAD 24 ACLAD 28 ACLAD 27 ACLAD 16 ACLAD 26 ACLAD 29 ACLAD 8 ACLAD 21 ACLAD 22 UB02 0.55 UB02 0.55 UB02 0.55 KC14 0.18 KC17 0.14 PB09 0.98 AB010.06 AB170.07 AB640.09 AB760.13 AB77 0.07 AB79 0.05 AB80 0.05 CR50 0.02 CR51 0.09 CR53 0.03 CR56 0.03 CR57 0.08 CR58 0.06 CR59 0.11 CR60 0.06 CW01 0.06 CW05 0.08 CW06 0.06 CW08 0.02 FT08 0.12 FT09 0.07 FT10 0.02 KC05 0.11 KC06 0.08 KC07 0.07 KC15 0.08 KC16 0.12 KC18 0.07 KC19 0.16 KC20 0.03 KC21 0.10 KC22 0.12 KC23 0.12 KC25 0.09 KC26 0.02KC28 0.08 KC29 0.03 KC30 0.01 KC31 0.11 KC34 0.13KC35 0.07 KC36 0.14 KC37 0.05 KC39 0.03 RP01 0.10 RP02 0.03RP03 0.09 RP05 0.00 AB04 1.84 AB13 2.25 AB16 1.51 AB21 1.95 AB242.24 AB500.81 AB51 1.98 AB53 1.92 AB572.01 AB58 2.01 AB59 2.15 AB60 2.00 AB62 1.72 AB63 1.93 AB65 1.85 AB66 1.84 AB67 1.45 AB68 1.86 AB702.27 AB73 1.42 AB751.99 AB780.19 AB81 1.94 AB83 1.94 AB841.15 AB85 1.18 CR54 1.98 PB04 1.62 PB061.11 PB07 1.25 PB08 1.12 PB12 1.14 PB13 0.44 PB18 1.70 PB201.27 PB211.41 PB26 0.50 PB27 1.39 PB29 0.50 PB54 1.67 PB55 1.35 PB59 1.54 PB67 1.05 PB68 1.68 PB69 1.38 PB70 1.51 PB71RP 1.86 PB72 1.56 PB75 1.60 PB76 0.82 PB77 1.23 UB02 0.55 COTTON,S HIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA SC6163 POS MP December 16, 2025 1"=500' FIGURE NO. PROJECT NO. DATE SCALE APPROVED BY GEO/ENG BY GPS MONITORING DISPLACEMENT RATE CONTOUR MAP (12/2/25 DATA) 1 Abalone Cove, Portuguese Bend, Klondike Canyon Hillshade basemap produced from publicly available LiDAR: "2015 - 2016 LARIAC Lidar DEM: Los Angeles Region, CA" D-1 ,,,,. -- ✓ -....) ------ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I I ,r ---r - . • \ , --- ♦ ' ♦ ,,,.. ,r 4 1 * , ,. / ✓ ~-. / ♦ / -· ♦ , J --/ / ',,. / -I" --• ♦ , _,. 0 250 500 1000 (feet) PONY TRAIL PORTUGUESE BEND LANDSLIDE FLYING TRIANGLE LANDSLIDE KLONDIKE CANYON LANDSLIDE ABALONE COVE LANDSLIDE ABALONE COVE PORTUGUESE POINT INSPIRATION POINT SACRED COVE PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH BURMA ROAD EXPLANATION Limits of the Ancient Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex Limits of Historically Mapped Landslides 2023/2024 Landslide Features (based on CSA field mapping) SEAVIEW TRACT Limits of 2023-2024 Major Landslide Movement (based on CSA field mapping and bathymetry survey) LIMITS OF 2023-2024 MAJOR LANDSLIDE MOVEMENT GPS Monument Displacement Rate (December 2, 2025 to January 8, 2026) Displacement Vector Scale 1"= 8"/week Displacement Rate Table Minimum Rate (inch/week) 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 Maximum Rate (inch/week) 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 Color 10.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 1.00 2.00 12.00 13.00 0.00 1.00 APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF ANCIENT PORTUGUESE BEND LANDSLIDE COMPLEX BEACH CLUB LANSDSLIDE DDW-10 DDW-9A DDW-9 DDW-11 DDW-8 DDW-7 DDW-5 DDW-4 DDW-6 DDW-1 DDW-2 DDW-3 WW-3 MW-18 WW-12 WW-13 WW-30 WW-1 WW-6 WW-7 WW-17 WW-11 WW-15 WW-21 UDW-ACLAD-1 KC-1 KC-3 KC-4 KC-6 KC-5 KC-2 KC-7 KC-4A ACLAD 25 ACLAD 24 ACLAD 28 ACLAD 27 ACLAD 16 ACLAD 26 ACLAD 29 ACLAD 8 ACLAD 21 ACLAD 22 CR58 0.15 AB01 0.13 AB17 0.06 AB64 0.09 AB76 0.08 AB77 0.08 AB78 0.08 AB79 0.04 AB80 0.02 CR50 0.07 CR51 0.10 CR53 0.06 CR56 0.09 CR57 0.06 CR59 0.10 CR60 0.08 CW01 0.05 CW05 0.05 CW06 0.04 CW08 0.06 FT08 0.06 FT09 0.09 FT10 0.04 KC05 0.02 KC06 0.14 KC07 0.06 KC14 0.02 KC15 0.06 KC16 0.09 KC17 0.03 KC18 0.11 KC19 0.11 KC20 0.09 KC21 0.04 KC22 0.06 KC23 0.05 KC25 0.05 KC26 0.02KC28 0.01 KC29 0.04 KC30 0.07 KC31 0.04 KC34 0.07 KC35 0.09 KC36 0.05 KC37 0.09 KC39 0.01 RP01 0.07 RP02 0.06 RP03 0.07 RP05 0.00 AB04 1.98 AB13 2.41 AB16 1.58 AB21 1.99 AB24 2.33 AB50 0.83 AB51 1.91 AB53 1.98 AB57 2.13 AB58 2.16 AB59 2.22 AB60 2.27 AB62 1.81 AB63 1.99 AB65 1.90 AB66 2.01 AB67 1.56 AB68 1.99 AB70 2.21 AB73 1.50 AB75 1.99 AB81 2.02 AB83 1.98 AB84 1.27 AB85 1.21 CR54 2.24 PB04 1.74 PB06 1.31 PB07 1.49 PB08 1.28 PB09 1.18 PB12 1.13 PB13 0.48 PB18 1.76 PB20 1.32 PB21 1.36 PB26 0.56 PB27 1.39 PB29 0.56 PB54 1.91 PB55 1.43 PB59 1.67 PB67 1.25 PB68 1.72PB69 1.58 PB70 1.62 PB71RP 1.97 PB72 1.68 PB75 1.67 PB76 0.92 PB77 1.45 UB02 0.62 COTTON,S HIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA SC6163 POS MP January 21, 2026 1"=500' FIGURE NO. PROJECT NO. DATE SCALE APPROVED BY GEO/ENG BY GPS MONITORING DISPLACEMENT RATE CONTOUR MAP (1/8/26 DATA) 1 Abalone Cove, Portuguese Bend, Klondike Canyon Hillshade basemap produced from publicly available LiDAR: "2015 - 2016 LARIAC Lidar DEM: Los Angeles Region, CA" D-2 ,,,,. -- ✓ -....) ------ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I I ,r ---r - . • \ , --- ♦ ' ♦ ,,,.. ,r 4 1 * , ,. / ✓ ~-. / ♦ / -· ♦ , J --/ / ',,. / -I" --• ♦ , _,. Notes: An average month is 30 * = Indicates no horizontal movement detected in the Period at the 95% level of confidence $ = Overall Movement is Relative to the Date of Origin which varies, see Year & Page 1 for Date 1 = Probable Error of the Indicated Movement, not of the Rate/Month 2 = Periodic Movement Time Intervals are as indicated and reflected in the Rates 3 = Movement Indeterminate until Next Monitoring, If Accumlative then Movement has Occurred NAVD88 Rate/Mo Rate/Mo Point North (ft) East (ft) Elev(ft) North East Height Azim.º 2D Dist. North East Height Azim.º 2D Dist. 95%Err(1)Rate/Mo.Note % Chg North East Height Azim.º 2D Dist. 95%Err(1)Rate/Mo.Note % Chg AB01 1729427.56 6445709.61 178.65 -0.03 0.00 0.03 175 0.03 0.05 0.02 -0.04 16 0.06 0.04 * AB04 1728351.61 6447082.23 61.73 -40.39 -41.12 -5.84 226 57.64 -0.58 -0.65 -0.08 228 0.87 0.04 0.74 11 -0.34 -0.36 -0.12 227 0.49 0.04 0.71 -7 AB13 1729874.47 6448221.79 354.16 -54.43 -14.25 -10.87 195 56.26 -1.03 -0.25 -0.31 194 1.06 0.04 0.90 10 -0.68 -0.17 -0.28 194 0.70 0.04 1.01 37 AB16 1730320.93 6447525.01 374.04 -37.95 -7.11 -2.58 191 38.61 -0.69 -0.09 -0.09 187 0.70 0.04 0.59 8 -0.42 -0.05 -0.08 187 0.42 0.04 0.61 10 AB17 1731420.98 6446727.80 442.74 -0.14 0.02 -0.06 171 0.15 0.01 0.03 0.00 63 0.03 0.04 * AB21 1729299.64 6449660.73 393.64 -55.43 -14.29 -1.30 194 57.24 -0.85 -0.20 -0.11 193 0.87 0.04 0.74 5 AB24 1729772.25 6447744.86 332.96 -58.11 -15.10 -2.97 195 60.04 -1.00 -0.23 -0.13 193 1.02 0.04 0.87 7 -0.61 -0.16 -0.07 195 0.63 0.04 0.91 13 AB50 1728065.72 6448223.50 184.86 -19.28 -24.68 2.88 232 31.32 -0.19 -0.31 0.01 239 0.37 0.04 0.31 5 AB51 1729572.71 6447290.73 303.54 -44.30 -15.81 -1.88 200 47.04 -0.80 -0.25 -0.04 197 0.84 0.04 0.71 -1 AB53 1730375.50 6449702.86 347.34 -55.61 -9.51 -5.79 190 56.42 -0.86 -0.14 -0.12 189 0.87 0.04 0.74 6 -0.50 -0.06 -0.10 187 0.50 0.04 0.73 -2 AB57 1731885.06 6449745.40 552.19 -41.85 -13.97 -12.74 198 44.12 -0.76 -0.55 -0.24 216 0.94 0.04 0.79 9 AB58 1731062.65 6449071.33 395.64 -55.37 -3.60 -10.03 184 55.49 -0.95 -0.10 -0.21 186 0.95 0.04 0.81 11 -0.56 -0.08 -0.14 188 0.57 0.04 0.82 5 AB59 1730789.59 6450205.87 418.19 -61.28 -6.69 -16.19 186 61.64 -0.97 -0.13 -0.29 187 0.98 0.04 0.83 6 -0.58 -0.07 -0.15 187 0.58 0.04 0.84 5 AB60 1729040.89 6447964.53 175.81 -48.81 -23.04 -3.64 205 53.97 -0.89 -0.45 -0.03 207 1.00 0.04 0.84 16 AB62 1728872.49 6446902.86 138.97 -37.86 -22.60 -4.05 211 44.09 -0.65 -0.46 -0.11 216 0.80 0.04 0.67 8 AB63 1729015.15 6447281.00 167.29 -44.15 -26.03 -13.55 211 51.25 -0.73 -0.49 -0.31 214 0.88 0.04 0.74 6 -0.42 -0.27 -0.22 212 0.50 0.04 0.73 -5 AB64 1731829.27 6447374.41 531.64 -1.42 1.32 -0.61 137 1.94 0.02 0.04 0.00 59 0.04 0.04 * AB65 1731661.08 6448268.96 445.24 -44.60 4.90 -13.29 174 44.87 -0.84 0.03 -0.23 178 0.84 0.04 0.71 6 AB66 1729997.01 6448478.45 366.90 -50.28 -12.08 -7.39 194 51.71 -0.86 -0.20 -0.19 193 0.88 0.04 0.75 12 AB67 1731144.25 6447739.07 397.07 -36.16 -2.69 -8.26 184 36.26 -0.68 -0.07 -0.21 186 0.69 0.04 0.58 11 AB68 1730209.67 6448045.08 384.47 -49.19 -10.28 -8.98 192 50.25 -0.86 -0.17 -0.22 191 0.88 0.04 0.74 10 AB70 1729235.00 6448334.30 248.56 -56.48 -18.57 -5.59 198 59.45 -0.95 -0.23 -0.18 194 0.97 0.04 0.82 0 AB73 1728412.85 6448378.34 303.01 -43.19 -15.70 -3.69 200 45.95 -0.63 -0.20 -0.10 198 0.66 0.04 0.56 9 AB74 AB75 1729581.47 6449326.94 347.41 -38.70 -9.41 -1.60 194 39.82 -0.85 -0.21 -0.04 194 0.87 0.04 0.74 3 AB76 1730022.73 6446807.09 385.78 -0.40 0.45 -0.50 131 0.60 0.04 -0.01 -0.04 344 0.04 0.04 * AB77 1733161.92 6446514.85 895.25 0.00 -0.01 -0.07 270 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.04 42 0.04 0.04 * AB78 1732238.78 6448523.48 568.73 -2.38 0.60 -1.01 166 2.46 -0.03 -0.01 -0.08 204 0.03 0.04 * AB79 1734784.21 6448718.97 1169.74 0.00 -0.03 -0.03 279 0.03 0.02 -0.01 0.05 341 0.02 0.04 * AB80 1734692.16 6447838.28 1165.50 0.01 -0.02 -0.05 295 0.02 0.00 -0.01 0.02 254 0.01 0.04 * AB81 1731124.54 6448786.96 393.11 -15.85 -1.48 -3.20 185 15.92 -0.88 -0.10 -0.16 186 0.89 0.04 0.75 7 AB83 1729269.49 6446951.49 214.66 -4.77 -2.10 -0.03 204 5.21 -0.79 -0.37 0.02 205 0.87 0.04 0.74 5 -0.51 -0.19 0.00 200 0.54 0.04 0.79 16 AB84 1732180.52 6448637.19 553.84 -2.57 0.25 -1.58 174 2.58 -0.56 -0.03 -0.33 183 0.56 0.04 0.47 14 -0.37 -0.02 -0.18 183 0.37 0.04 0.54 43 AB85 1729591.10 6446858.76 268.19 -1.22 -0.64 -0.29 208 1.38 -0.48 -0.24 -0.15 207 0.53 0.04 0.45 5 CR50 1733013.06 6451036.30 872.27 -0.56 -1.08 -0.39 242 1.21 0.03 -0.01 0.01 348 0.03 0.04 * CR51 1733061.30 6452360.71 975.91 -0.73 -1.15 -0.34 238 1.37 0.04 -0.01 0.00 348 0.04 0.04 * CR53 1732779.41 6450222.71 780.29 -0.87 -1.49 -0.43 240 1.72 0.02 -0.02 0.01 319 0.03 0.04 * CR54 1731196.52 6450980.99 516.71 -48.72 -10.84 -10.84 193 49.91 -0.94 -0.29 -0.23 197 0.99 0.04 0.84 16 CR55A 1735437.66 6450188.37 1157.31 -0.01 -0.04 0.04 254 0.04 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 280 0.02 0.04 * CR56 1733194.40 6449201.86 782.64 -0.01 -0.03 0.05 257 0.04 0.04 -0.01 0.01 349 0.04 0.04 * CR57 1731568.82 6451323.45 619.41 -0.05 -0.07 0.47 234 0.09 0.00 0.03 -0.02 88 0.03 0.04 * CR58 1732680.35 6452989.17 916.90 -0.27 -0.38 -0.10 235 0.46 -0.02 -0.06 0.03 252 0.07 0.04 3 CR59 1731860.87 6453394.61 878.07 -0.10 -0.14 -0.02 235 0.17 0.01 -0.04 -0.01 282 0.04 0.04 * CR60 1732970.71 6452807.41 921.83 -0.12 -0.18 -0.03 236 0.22 -0.02 -0.03 0.03 246 0.04 0.04 * CW01 1734174.35 6450266.35 1175.37 0.04 0.03 0.03 35 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.00 28 0.02 0.04 * CW05 1732067.19 6450634.38 701.90 -1.17 -1.12 -0.04 224 1.62 0.02 0.00 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 * CW06 1730906.28 6452118.19 529.76 0.04 0.01 0.00 17 0.04 0.02 -0.01 -0.03 332 0.02 0.04 * CW08 1729146.31 6453119.79 607.56 0.02 0.01 0.11 16 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 56 0.03 0.04 * FT08 1729388.67 6453350.51 658.44 -0.02 0.01 0.00 149 0.02 -0.02 0.02 0.04 132 0.03 0.04 * FT09 1729052.87 6454289.20 590.86 -0.02 -0.09 0.03 256 0.10 0.04 0.01 -0.02 14 0.04 0.04 * FT10 1730454.57 6452471.92 482.25 0.00 0.00 -0.10 76 0.00 0.02 0.01 -0.04 25 0.02 0.04 * KC05 1727077.19 6453174.10 226.77 -4.81 -5.00 -1.09 226 6.94 -0.01 0.01 0.01 119 0.01 0.04 * KC06 1727782.49 6453384.91 295.74 -2.42 -11.76 -4.61 258 12.00 0.02 -0.06 0.00 291 0.06 0.04 * KC07 1727759.38 6453683.87 313.49 0.00 0.02 -0.02 75 0.02 0.01 -0.02 -0.04 301 0.03 0.04 * KC14 1726742.31 6453805.50 260.01 -0.13 -0.56 0.07 257 0.57 0.01 0.00 -0.01 23 0.01 0.04 * KC15 1727584.39 6453111.46 284.08 -6.06 -9.64 -3.02 238 11.39 0.02 -0.01 -0.02 325 0.02 0.04 *0.01 -0.01 -0.02 312 0.01 0.04 * KC16 1727602.25 6454098.20 327.27 0.00 -0.03 0.37 272 0.03 0.01 -0.04 0.01 282 0.04 0.04 * KC17 1727295.87 6453019.50 212.70 -6.90 -6.93 -2.56 225 9.78 0.00 -0.01 -0.03 274 0.02 0.04 * KC18 1727979.50 6452613.63 289.08 -21.00 -8.54 -2.09 202 22.67 0.03 -0.04 -0.04 309 0.05 0.04 * KC19 1727780.05 6453488.54 302.80 -0.36 -8.68 -3.54 268 8.69 0.01 -0.05 0.00 282 0.05 0.04 * KC20 1727695.36 6453561.59 303.79 0.20 -7.96 -3.51 271 7.96 0.02 -0.03 0.01 298 0.04 0.04 * KC21 1728095.83 6453495.10 383.59 0.01 0.02 -0.01 58 0.02 -0.02 0.00 -0.04 189 0.02 0.04 * KC22 1728008.15 6453287.36 329.08 -2.01 -10.53 -5.27 259 10.72 -0.02 -0.02 -0.07 214 0.03 0.04 * KC23 1727348.77 6453321.55 267.56 -2.65 -5.46 -1.75 244 6.07 0.02 -0.01 -0.04 317 0.02 0.04 * KC25 1726304.91 6452805.41 19.77 -0.38 -0.20 -0.03 208 0.43 -0.01 -0.02 0.01 245 0.02 0.04 * KC26 1726723.09 6452425.80 31.10 -6.44 -1.32 6.35 192 6.57 -0.01 0.00 0.01 210 0.01 0.04 *0.00 0.03 0.01 94 0.03 0.04 * KC28 1726768.65 6451998.88 26.22 -9.14 -1.02 6.28 186 9.20 0.00 0.00 -0.01 270 0.00 0.04 * KC29 1726923.96 6451934.53 19.86 -10.47 -3.10 1.96 197 10.93 0.01 -0.01 -0.01 288 0.02 0.04 * KC30 1727529.46 6452141.97 97.65 -14.59 -4.54 -2.60 197 15.28 0.00 -0.03 -0.03 268 0.03 0.04 * KC31 1727911.05 6452353.16 206.78 -13.88 -5.04 -0.72 200 14.77 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 261 0.02 0.04 *0.02 0.01 -0.08 19 0.02 0.04 * KC34 1726698.43 6454866.42 325.37 0.03 -0.02 0.01 330 0.04 0.02 -0.02 0.02 311 0.03 0.04 * KC35 1726861.68 6454504.93 313.29 0.02 -0.03 -0.01 305 0.04 0.02 -0.03 0.01 300 0.04 0.04 * KC36 1726390.10 6454165.09 254.96 0.04 -0.06 -0.05 300 0.07 0.01 -0.02 -0.03 292 0.02 0.04 * KC37 1726109.85 6454779.82 280.31 0.03 -0.03 -0.01 319 0.04 0.03 -0.02 0.00 319 0.04 0.04 * KC39 1726579.09 6453069.30 192.40 -0.03 0.02 -0.03 146 0.03 0.00 0.00 -0.03 63 0.00 0.04 *-0.01 0.01 -0.01 143 0.01 0.04 * PB04 1727614.07 6448830.22 164.10 -61.87 -21.52 -6.42 199 65.50 -0.74 -0.22 -0.04 197 0.77 0.04 0.65 10 PB06 1727890.62 6449747.28 173.45 -77.83 -14.55 -9.61 191 79.17 -0.57 -0.07 -0.07 186 0.58 0.04 0.49 22 PB07 1728084.21 6450197.17 195.56 -91.72 -22.58 -4.65 194 94.46 -0.65 -0.11 -0.05 189 0.65 0.04 0.55 22 -0.40 -0.06 -0.04 188 0.40 0.04 0.58 11 PB08 1728152.70 6450450.13 196.59 -84.80 -19.67 2.91 193 87.06 -0.56 -0.05 0.04 185 0.56 0.04 0.48 17 PB09 1728200.01 6450841.20 188.96 -88.57 -9.82 -3.56 186 89.11 -0.52 0.03 -0.02 176 0.52 0.04 0.44 23 PB12 1728198.76 6451565.76 177.46 -131.72 -38.81 -15.83 196 137.32 -0.49 -0.10 -0.17 192 0.50 0.04 0.42 3 -0.32 -0.06 -0.11 190 0.33 0.04 0.48 36 PB13 1728003.47 6452132.20 205.56 -82.50 -32.15 -4.98 201 88.54 -0.18 -0.11 0.00 212 0.21 0.04 0.18 10 PB18 1730375.60 6450713.76 355.50 -71.28 2.76 -12.08 178 71.34 -0.77 -0.11 -0.20 188 0.77 0.04 0.65 6 PB20 1728685.27 6451110.51 224.56 -127.50 -25.17 -18.98 191 129.96 -0.58 -0.06 -0.14 186 0.58 0.04 0.49 6 PB21 1729189.67 6451171.35 265.68 -108.55 -0.70 -14.34 180 108.55 -0.60 0.04 -0.10 176 0.60 0.04 0.51 -1 PB26 1729502.52 6452246.28 279.87 -60.13 -3.28 -5.47 183 60.22 -0.24 0.07 -0.10 164 0.25 0.04 0.21 14 PB27 1729184.62 6451834.24 260.34 -154.72 -1.82 -24.08 181 154.73 -0.61 -0.01 -0.21 181 0.61 0.04 0.52 2 PB29 1728801.35 6452075.64 159.53 -87.60 -44.85 -26.40 207 98.41 -0.18 -0.17 -0.11 223 0.25 0.04 0.21 16 PB54 1729636.23 6450437.70 355.41 -58.67 -10.98 -3.21 191 59.69 -0.83 -0.12 -0.13 188 0.84 0.04 0.71 17 -0.51 -0.05 -0.06 186 0.51 0.04 0.74 9 PB55 1728721.18 6450789.69 230.58 -91.10 -14.35 -15.75 189 92.23 -0.63 -0.06 -0.22 186 0.63 0.04 0.53 9 PB59 1727701.71 6448641.30 151.31 -64.65 -20.37 -12.09 197 67.79 -0.70 -0.24 -0.04 199 0.74 0.04 0.62 12 PB67 1727545.18 6450841.13 63.55 -93.55 -17.05 -12.46 190 95.09 -0.54 -0.10 -0.10 190 0.55 0.04 0.47 23 PB68 1727616.52 6448966.77 171.37 -48.92 -16.22 -1.74 198 51.54 -0.74 -0.15 -0.08 192 0.76 0.04 0.64 5 PB69 1727733.45 6448760.46 162.02 -49.59 -18.13 -2.66 200 52.80 -0.66 -0.23 -0.04 199 0.70 0.04 0.59 18 PB70 1727805.27 6448601.15 149.22 -49.63 -18.45 -7.02 200 52.95 -0.68 -0.21 -0.03 197 0.72 0.04 0.60 11 PB71RP 1728416.92 6449739.24 282.12 -16.75 -2.36 -2.72 188 16.91 -0.85 -0.17 -0.22 191 0.87 0.04 0.73 9 -0.51 -0.10 -0.15 191 0.52 0.04 0.75 7 PB72 1727609.62 6449324.52 199.07 -40.70 -16.90 3.18 203 44.07 -0.71 -0.23 -0.01 198 0.74 0.04 0.63 11 PB75 1729038.16 6450344.72 267.50 -45.70 -7.19 -4.41 189 46.26 -0.73 -0.04 -0.17 183 0.73 0.04 0.62 7 PB76 1729964.81 6451646.05 290.52 -8.28 0.18 -1.28 179 8.28 -0.41 0.02 -0.12 178 0.41 0.04 0.34 16 -0.26 0.02 -0.05 177 0.26 0.04 0.38 32 PB77 1727514.30 6451675.31 98.40 -6.33 -0.71 -0.64 186 6.37 -0.63 -0.08 -0.05 187 0.64 0.04 0.54 21 -0.37 -0.02 -0.07 183 0.37 0.04 0.54 -1 UB02 1727469.17 6450141.23 65.64 -111.95 7.45 -1.51 176 112.20 -0.26 0.08 0.02 164 0.27 0.04 0.23 PVE3RP 1729195.89 6438764.66 346.91 0.01 -0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.00 -0.02 0.03 0.02 *0.02 0.00 -0.03 0.02 0.02 * RP01 1725591.76 6455633.53 292.72 0.02 -0.01 0.06 0.02 0.01 -0.03 -0.03 0.03 0.02 *0.01 0.00 -0.05 0.01 0.02 * RP02 1730832.99 6445586.62 480.66 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.01 -0.01 0.03 0.02 *0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 * RP03 1730848.53 6445628.20 480.04 0.03 -0.02 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.02 *0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 * RP05 1730809.66 6445501.99 474.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fixed Fixed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fixed Fixed NAD83 CA SPC Zone 5 Original Position to January 08, 2026December 02, 2025 to January 08, 2026 (36 days / 1.183 Mo.) Periodic Movements M88 to M89 (US Feet) December 17, 2025 to January 08, 2026 (21 days / 0.690 Mo.) PORTUGUESE BEND LANDSLIDE MONITORING - MOVEMENT at January 08, 2026 Page 9/9 Prepared by McGee Surveying Consulting - Document Date: January 18, 2026 Monitoring Point Movements FULL PVDS MONITORING #89 (M89) January 08, 2026 Positions $ Overall Movements (US Feet)Periodic Movements M87 to M89 (US Feet) E-1 I I I I I ~ ~~,%(:A,.--[t7~ . Michael R. McGee. PLS3945 MC0a I • LS3"5 --- I I I I I I Av.0.61 Av. 10.0 Av.0.70 Av. 13 E-2 Notes: An average month is 30.42 day * = Indicates no horizontal movement detected in the Period at the 95% level of confidence $ = Overall Movement is Relative to the Date of Origin which varies, see Year & Page 1 for Date 1 = Probable Error of the Indicated Movement not of the Rate/Month 2 = Periodic Movement Time Intervals are as indicated and reflected in the Rates 3 = Movement Indeterminate until Next Monitoring, If Accumlative then Movement has Occurred 4 = PB09 Periodic Movement is from Oct. 2, 2025 to Dec. 2, 2025; rate based on two months (No position available for Nov. 4, 2025) NAVD88 Rate/Mo Point North (ft) East (ft) Elev(ft) North East Height Azim.º 2D Dist. North East Height Azim.º 2D Dist. 95%Err(1)Rate/Mo.Note % Chg AB01 1729427.50 6445709.60 178.69 -0.08 -0.01 0.07 190 0.08 0.00 -0.02 0.02 258 0.02 0.04 * AB04 1728352.19 6447082.87 61.82 -39.80 -40.47 -5.75 225 56.76 -0.42 -0.45 -0.08 227 0.61 0.04 0.67 18 0.00 AB13 1729875.50 6448222.04 354.48 -53.40 -13.99 -10.55 195 55.20 -0.73 -0.19 -0.19 195 0.75 0.04 0.82 12 AB16 1730321.62 6447525.10 374.13 -37.26 -7.02 -2.49 191 37.92 -0.50 -0.05 -0.03 186 0.50 0.04 0.55 0 AB17 1731420.96 6446727.77 442.74 -0.16 0.00 -0.06 181 0.16 0.02 0.02 -0.05 40 0.02 0.04 * AB21 1729300.49 6449660.93 393.75 -54.58 -14.09 -1.19 194 56.37 -0.64 -0.13 0.02 192 0.65 0.04 0.70 7 AB24 1729773.25 6447745.09 333.08 -57.11 -14.87 -2.84 195 59.01 -0.73 -0.17 -0.07 193 0.75 0.04 0.81 3 AB50 1728065.91 6448223.81 184.85 -19.09 -24.37 2.87 232 30.96 -0.18 -0.20 0.00 228 0.27 0.04 0.29 17 AB51 1729573.52 6447290.98 303.59 -43.49 -15.56 -1.83 200 46.19 -0.63 -0.19 -0.01 197 0.66 0.04 0.72 13 AB53 1730376.36 6449703.00 347.46 -54.75 -9.37 -5.67 190 55.54 -0.63 -0.11 -0.07 190 0.64 0.04 0.69 0 AB57 1731885.82 6449745.95 552.42 -41.09 -13.42 -12.51 198 43.22 -0.57 -0.36 -0.17 212 0.67 0.04 0.73 6 AB58 1731063.60 6449071.43 395.85 -54.42 -3.50 -9.82 184 54.53 -0.67 -0.07 -0.09 186 0.67 0.04 0.73 -2 AB59 1730790.56 6450205.99 418.48 -60.31 -6.56 -15.89 186 60.66 -0.71 -0.10 -0.17 188 0.72 0.04 0.78 9 AB60 1729041.79 6447964.98 175.84 -47.92 -22.59 -3.61 205 52.97 -0.60 -0.30 -0.01 207 0.67 0.04 0.73 6 AB62 1728873.14 6446903.32 139.08 -37.22 -22.14 -3.93 211 43.30 -0.48 -0.31 -0.04 213 0.57 0.04 0.62 19 AB63 1729015.88 6447281.49 167.60 -43.42 -25.55 -13.25 210 50.37 -0.54 -0.35 -0.22 213 0.64 0.04 0.70 20 AB64 1731829.25 6447374.37 531.64 -1.44 1.29 -0.61 138 1.93 0.01 -0.03 0.01 297 0.03 0.04 * AB65 1731661.91 6448268.94 445.47 -43.76 4.87 -13.06 174 44.03 -0.62 0.01 -0.20 179 0.62 0.04 0.67 10 AB66 1729997.87 6448478.64 367.09 -49.42 -11.89 -7.20 194 50.83 -0.60 -0.14 -0.14 193 0.61 0.04 0.67 -3 AB67 1731144.93 6447739.14 397.28 -35.48 -2.62 -8.05 184 35.57 -0.48 -0.05 -0.13 186 0.48 0.04 0.53 2 AB68 1730210.53 6448045.25 384.69 -48.32 -10.11 -8.76 192 49.37 -0.61 -0.12 -0.11 191 0.62 0.04 0.67 1 AB70 1729235.94 6448334.53 248.73 -55.53 -18.34 -5.41 198 58.48 -0.73 -0.20 -0.08 195 0.76 0.04 0.82 10 AB73 1728413.48 6448378.54 303.12 -42.56 -15.49 -3.59 200 45.29 -0.45 -0.14 -0.02 197 0.47 0.04 0.51 6 AB74 AB75 1729582.32 6449327.15 347.45 -37.84 -9.21 -1.56 194 38.95 -0.65 -0.13 0.04 191 0.66 0.04 0.72 8 AB76 1730022.69 6446807.10 385.82 -0.43 0.46 -0.46 133 0.63 -0.01 0.04 -0.01 102 0.04 0.04 * AB77 1733161.89 6446514.82 895.21 -0.03 -0.03 -0.11 229 0.04 -0.02 0.00 -0.09 183 0.02 0.04 * AB78 1732238.81 6448523.49 568.81 -2.35 0.62 -0.93 165 2.43 -0.06 -0.02 0.03 202 0.06 0.04 0.07 AB79 1734784.19 6448718.98 1169.70 -0.01 -0.02 -0.07 237 0.02 -0.01 0.00 -0.02 195 0.02 0.04 * AB80 1734692.16 6447838.29 1165.48 0.01 -0.01 -0.07 311 0.02 -0.02 0.00 -0.01 180 0.02 0.04 * AB81 1731125.42 6448787.06 393.27 -14.97 -1.38 -3.04 185 15.03 -0.64 -0.09 -0.11 188 0.65 0.04 0.70 9 AB83 1729270.28 6446951.86 214.63 -3.98 -1.73 -0.05 204 4.34 -0.60 -0.24 -0.04 201 0.65 0.04 0.70 21 AB84 1732181.07 6448637.22 554.16 -2.01 0.28 -1.26 172 2.03 -0.38 -0.03 -0.29 184 0.38 0.04 0.42 -10 AB85 1729591.57 6446859.00 268.34 -0.74 -0.40 -0.14 208 0.84 -0.34 -0.19 -0.06 209 0.39 0.04 0.43 4 CR50 1733013.03 6451036.31 872.26 -0.59 -1.07 -0.40 241 1.22 0.00 -0.01 -0.02 252 0.01 0.04 * CR51 1733061.26 6452360.72 975.91 -0.77 -1.14 -0.34 236 1.38 -0.03 0.00 0.00 182 0.03 0.04 * CR53 1732779.39 6450222.73 780.28 -0.89 -1.47 -0.45 239 1.71 -0.01 0.00 -0.05 153 0.01 0.04 * CR54 1731197.46 6450981.28 516.94 -47.78 -10.54 -10.61 192 48.93 -0.62 -0.22 -0.12 200 0.66 0.04 0.72 -3 CR55A 1735437.66 6450188.40 1157.33 -0.01 -0.01 0.05 223 0.02 0.00 0.03 -0.01 81 0.03 0.04 * CR56 1733194.36 6449201.87 782.62 -0.04 -0.03 0.04 212 0.05 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 221 0.01 0.04 * CR57 1731568.82 6451323.43 619.42 -0.05 -0.10 0.48 241 0.11 0.02 -0.01 -0.02 329 0.03 0.04 * CR58 1732680.37 6452989.23 916.87 -0.24 -0.32 -0.13 233 0.40 -0.01 -0.02 -0.05 248 0.02 0.04 * CR59 1731860.86 6453394.65 878.08 -0.10 -0.09 -0.01 222 0.14 -0.04 0.00 0.01 187 0.04 0.04 * CR60 1732970.72 6452807.44 921.80 -0.11 -0.15 -0.06 234 0.18 -0.02 -0.01 -0.03 198 0.02 0.04 * CW01 1734174.33 6450266.34 1175.37 0.02 0.02 0.02 41 0.03 -0.02 0.00 -0.04 183 0.02 0.04 * CW05 1732067.17 6450634.38 701.92 -1.19 -1.12 -0.02 223 1.63 -0.01 -0.02 0.00 248 0.03 0.04 * CW06 1730906.26 6452118.19 529.79 0.02 0.02 0.02 45 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 39 0.02 0.04 * CW08 1729146.30 6453119.77 607.52 0.01 -0.01 0.07 306 0.02 0.00 0.00 -0.02 321 0.01 0.04 * FT08 1729388.69 6453350.49 658.40 0.00 -0.01 -0.04 285 0.01 0.04 0.01 -0.01 17 0.04 0.04 * FT09 1729052.84 6454289.20 590.89 -0.06 -0.10 0.06 239 0.12 0.00 -0.02 0.01 277 0.02 0.04 * FT10 1730454.56 6452471.91 482.28 -0.01 0.00 -0.06 192 0.01 0.00 0.01 -0.02 120 0.01 0.04 * KC05 1727077.19 6453174.09 226.76 -4.81 -5.01 -1.11 226 6.94 0.03 -0.01 -0.07 339 0.04 0.04 * KC06 1727782.47 6453384.96 295.74 -2.44 -11.70 -4.61 258 11.95 0.02 0.02 -0.03 57 0.03 0.04 * KC07 1727759.36 6453683.89 313.53 -0.01 0.04 0.02 105 0.04 0.02 0.01 -0.01 34 0.02 0.04 * KC14 1726742.30 6453805.49 260.02 -0.14 -0.56 0.08 256 0.58 0.05 -0.03 -0.03 332 0.06 0.04 3 KC15 1727584.37 6453111.47 284.11 -6.08 -9.63 -2.99 238 11.39 0.02 -0.01 0.01 329 0.03 0.04 * KC16 1727602.24 6454098.24 327.26 -0.01 0.00 0.36 150 0.01 0.04 0.01 -0.04 11 0.04 0.04 * KC17 1727295.87 6453019.51 212.73 -6.90 -6.91 -2.52 225 9.77 0.05 0.00 -0.03 4 0.05 0.04 3 KC18 1727979.47 6452613.66 289.12 -21.03 -8.50 -2.05 202 22.69 0.01 0.02 0.00 56 0.02 0.04 * KC19 1727780.04 6453488.58 302.80 -0.37 -8.64 -3.54 268 8.64 0.05 0.02 -0.04 27 0.05 0.04 * KC20 1727695.34 6453561.62 303.77 0.18 -7.92 -3.52 271 7.92 0.01 0.01 -0.03 61 0.01 0.04 * KC21 1728095.85 6453495.10 383.64 0.03 0.02 0.03 34 0.03 0.03 0.00 -0.03 4 0.03 0.04 * KC22 1728008.18 6453287.38 329.15 -1.98 -10.51 -5.20 259 10.70 0.04 0.00 -0.01 359 0.04 0.04 * KC23 1727348.75 6453321.57 267.60 -2.67 -5.45 -1.71 244 6.06 0.04 -0.01 0.02 351 0.04 0.04 * KC25 1726304.92 6452805.43 19.77 -0.37 -0.18 -0.03 206 0.41 0.03 0.01 -0.03 11 0.03 0.04 * KC26 1726723.09 6452425.81 31.08 -6.43 -1.31 6.34 192 6.57 0.01 0.00 -0.03 8 0.01 0.04 * KC28 1726768.65 6451998.89 26.22 -9.14 -1.02 6.28 186 9.20 0.03 0.01 -0.03 18 0.03 0.04 * KC29 1726923.95 6451934.54 19.87 -10.48 -3.09 1.97 196 10.93 0.00 0.01 -0.01 66 0.01 0.04 * KC30 1727529.46 6452142.00 97.68 -14.59 -4.51 -2.57 197 15.27 0.00 0.00 -0.04 207 0.00 0.04 * KC31 1727911.05 6452353.18 206.80 -13.88 -5.03 -0.70 200 14.76 0.04 -0.01 -0.04 349 0.04 0.04 * KC34 1726698.41 6454866.44 325.35 0.01 0.01 -0.01 33 0.01 0.04 0.01 -0.04 11 0.04 0.04 * KC35 1726861.66 6454504.97 313.28 0.00 0.00 -0.02 66 0.00 0.02 0.00 -0.05 355 0.02 0.04 * KC36 1726390.10 6454165.11 255.00 0.03 -0.04 -0.01 303 0.05 0.05 0.00 -0.02 1 0.05 0.04 * KC37 1726109.82 6454779.84 280.31 0.00 0.00 -0.01 315 0.00 0.01 0.01 -0.02 33 0.02 0.04 * KC39 1726579.08 6453069.30 192.43 -0.03 0.01 0.00 154 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.02 10 0.01 0.04 * PB04 1727614.81 6448830.44 164.14 -61.13 -21.30 -6.38 199 64.74 -0.51 -0.17 -0.02 198 0.54 0.04 0.59 26 PB06 1727891.20 6449747.35 173.52 -77.25 -14.49 -9.54 191 78.60 -0.37 -0.05 -0.07 188 0.37 0.04 0.40 0 PB07 1728084.86 6450197.28 195.61 -91.07 -22.48 -4.60 194 93.80 -0.42 -0.05 -0.05 187 0.42 0.04 0.45 -4 PB08 1728153.26 6450450.18 196.55 -84.24 -19.62 2.87 193 86.50 -0.37 -0.02 -0.02 183 0.37 0.04 0.41 5 PB09 1728200.53 6450841.17 188.99 -88.05 -9.86 -3.54 186 88.60 -0.71 0.04 0.01 177 0.71 0.04 0.36 4 PB12 1728199.25 6451565.86 177.63 -131.24 -38.71 -15.66 196 136.82 -0.38 -0.04 -0.05 185 0.38 0.04 0.41 17 PB13 1728003.65 6452132.31 205.56 -82.32 -32.04 -4.98 201 88.33 -0.13 -0.07 -0.05 208 0.15 0.04 0.16 57 PB18 1730376.37 6450713.87 355.70 -70.52 2.88 -11.88 178 70.58 -0.56 -0.02 0.08 183 0.57 0.04 0.61 2 PB20 1728685.85 6451110.57 224.70 -126.92 -25.11 -18.84 191 129.38 -0.42 -0.02 -0.03 183 0.42 0.04 0.46 8 PB21 1729190.27 6451171.31 265.78 -107.95 -0.74 -14.24 180 107.95 -0.47 -0.01 -0.02 181 0.47 0.04 0.51 23 PB26 1729502.76 6452246.21 279.97 -59.89 -3.35 -5.37 183 59.99 -0.16 0.04 0.00 168 0.17 0.04 0.18 20 PB27 1729185.23 6451834.25 260.55 -154.11 -1.81 -23.87 181 154.12 -0.46 0.02 -0.04 177 0.46 0.04 0.50 8 PB29 1728801.53 6452075.81 159.64 -87.41 -44.68 -26.29 207 98.17 -0.13 -0.11 -0.05 221 0.17 0.04 0.18 -7 PB54 1729637.07 6450437.82 355.54 -57.83 -10.86 -3.08 191 58.84 -0.55 -0.07 0.07 187 0.56 0.04 0.61 4 PB55 1728721.81 6450789.76 230.81 -90.48 -14.28 -15.53 189 91.60 -0.45 -0.04 -0.08 184 0.45 0.04 0.49 -4 PB59 1727702.41 6448641.54 151.34 -63.96 -20.13 -12.05 197 67.05 -0.49 -0.16 -0.05 198 0.51 0.04 0.56 27 PB67 1727545.73 6450841.23 63.65 -93.00 -16.95 -12.36 190 94.54 -0.34 -0.05 -0.09 188 0.35 0.04 0.38 7 PB68 1727617.27 6448966.92 171.45 -48.18 -16.07 -1.66 198 50.79 -0.54 -0.14 -0.04 194 0.56 0.04 0.61 22 PB69 1727734.11 6448760.68 162.07 -48.93 -17.90 -2.61 200 52.10 -0.44 -0.14 -0.03 198 0.46 0.04 0.50 7 PB70 1727805.96 6448601.36 149.25 -48.95 -18.24 -6.99 200 52.24 -0.48 -0.14 -0.09 196 0.50 0.04 0.55 15 PB71RP 1728417.77 6449739.41 282.34 -15.89 -2.20 -2.51 188 16.04 -0.61 -0.10 -0.07 189 0.62 0.04 0.67 4 PB72 1727610.33 6449324.75 199.08 -40.00 -16.67 3.19 203 43.33 -0.49 -0.18 -0.03 200 0.52 0.04 0.56 10 PB75 1729038.89 6450344.76 267.66 -44.96 -7.14 -4.24 189 45.53 -0.53 0.00 0.04 180 0.53 0.04 0.58 4 PB76 1729965.22 6451646.03 290.63 -7.88 0.16 -1.16 179 7.88 -0.27 0.03 0.00 175 0.27 0.04 0.30 8 PB77 1727514.93 6451675.39 98.46 -5.70 -0.64 -0.59 186 5.74 -0.41 -0.04 -0.07 186 0.41 0.04 0.44 5 UB02 1727469.43 6450141.16 65.62 -111.68 7.37 -1.53 176 111.93 -0.17 0.07 -0.01 158 0.18 0.04 0.20 19 PVE3RP 1729195.87 6438764.66 346.93 -0.01 -0.01 0.05 0.02 -0.05 -0.01 0.01 0.05 0.02 * RP01 1725591.75 6455633.56 292.75 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.02 -0.01 0.03 0.02 * RP02 1730832.96 6445586.61 480.67 -0.02 -0.01 0.04 0.02 -0.01 -0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 * RP03 1730848.50 6445628.20 480.01 0.00 -0.02 0.03 0.02 -0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 * RP05 1730809.66 6445501.99 474.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fixed Fixed PORTUGUESE BEND LANDSLIDE MONITORING - MOVEMENT at December 02, 2025 Page 7/7 Prepared by McGee Surveying Consulting - Document Date: December 12, 2025 Monitoring Point Movements FULL PVDS MONITORING #87 (M87) NAD83 CA SPC Zone 5 Original Position to December 2, 2025 November 04, 2025 to December 02, 2025 (28 days / 0.920 Mo.) December 02, 2025 Positions $ Overall Movements (US Feet)Periodic Movements M86 to M87 (US Feet) E-3 I I I - m~,-~@ Mic hael R McGee PLS3945 MCGa I • LS31M,5 • ·, I I I I I I I I I I Av.0.53 Av. 9.1 E-4 I-1 GAVIN NEWSOM GOVERNOR January 16, 2026 Mr. Colt Hagmaier Cal OBS OOV£R'NOR '§ OFF IC E OF EMERGENCY S!!R\IICES Assistant Administrator, Recovery Directorate Via: Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr., Regional Administrator Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region IX U.S. Department of Homeland Security 1111 Broadway Street, Suite 1200 Oakland, California 94607 Subject: Second Appeal -Project Number 730185 FEMA-4699-DR-CA, 2023 February -April Storms CHRISTINA CURRY ACTING DIRECTOR Cal OES ID: 037-59514 FEMA ID: 037-59514-00 Subrecipient: City of Rancho Palos Verdes (Los Angeles County) Cal OES Log: COR-010260 FEMA Log: FA0078/DM-PRJ-34336 Grants Portal Appeal No: Appeal-361 6 Dear Mr. Hagmaier: The California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) would like to thank the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for its ongoing partnership in serving California communities. On December l, 2025, Cal OES received the enclosed letter of the same date from the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (Subrecipient). Cal OES recognized that appeal of the listed project was included with a later disaster and asked the Subrecipient to send a revised letter referencing the subject disaster (Enclosure l ) . This letter appeals FEMA's first appeal determination to deny Public Assistance (PA) funding for Project Number (PN) 730185 (Enclosure 2). The total amount of funding appealed by the Subrecipient is $11,415.00. Cal OES is unable to support the Subrecipient's appeal because evidence demonstrates the facilities were unstable prior to disaster, and therefore the work claimed is not required as a direct result of the declared disaster. 3650 SCHRIEVER AVENUE• MATHER, CA 95655 (916) 845-8506 TELEPHONE• (916) 845-8511 FAX www.CalOES .ca .gov I-2 Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr. Page2 FEMA's first appeal determination was uploaded to Grants Portal on October 8, 2025. In accordance with Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR) § 206.206(b) (2) (ii) (A), the Subrecipient's second appeal for PN 730185 was submitted within 60 calendar days of the upload date in Grants Portal (Enclosure 2). Background In response to FEMA-4699-DR-CA, 2023 February-April Storms (DR-4699), the Subrecipient claimed costs for contracted work to repair damage to Peppertree Trail and Burma Road Trail at the junction of Rim Trail in the Portuguese Bend Reserve (Enclosure 3). FEMA denied the eligibility of the Subrecipient's project citing two reasons: 1 . The work claimed is not required as a result of the declared disaster, and the Applicant cannot demonstrate the damage was directly caused by DR-4699. 2. The facilities were unstable based on pre-disaster evidence making the ground and facility restoration ineligible (Enclosure 4). First Appeal On May 8, 2025, Cal OES forwarded the Subrecipient's March 17, 2025, first appeal along with a letter stating that it was unable to support the Subrecipient's claim. Cal OES explained that the provided documentation demonstrated pre-existing landslide activity and slope instability. Based on this evidence, the damage forming the basis of the Applicant's reimbursement request was determined not to be a direct result of the declared disaster (Enclosure 5). In its first appeal, the Subrecipient argues that the damage was not solely due to pre-existing slope instability but was significantly accelerated by winter storm events associated with FEMA-CA-4699-CA, 2023 February -April Storms (DR- 4699). According to the Applicant, the storm triggered movement in the previously inactive Altamira Landslide. The Applicant further asserts that runoff from the DR-4699 event caused the Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex (Landslide Complex) to raft atop the deeper Altamira Landslide, resulting in unprecedented land movement. The Subrecipient demonstrates that the formerly dormant Altamira Landslide was reactivated by record rainfall between 2022 and 2024, following decades of "Weather Whiplash" (hydroclimate volatility) attributed to climate change (Enclosure 5, Page 8). Second Appeal Analysis In response to the Subrecipient's first appeal, FEMA denied PN 730185 detailing the conditions of ineligibility. Because of a well-documented history of landslide activity prior to DR-4699, FEMA concludes that the Subrecipient is unable to demonstrate the damage claimed is a result of the declared incident. FEMA I-3 Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr. Page3 describes that the Subrecipient' s claimed acceleration of landslide activity pre- dating the declared disaster, further illustrates this point. Citing the Public Assistance Program and Policy Guide (PAPPG) Version 4 (2020) at page 51 and 44 CFR § 206.223(0), FEMA explains the work claimed in the appealed projects does not meet this eligibility criteria. Additionally, FEMA's first appeal denial goes on to describe that restoration of integral ground that supports a facility may be eligible for PA. However, the pre- existing instability that is present in the claimed facilities make this restoration work ineligible, FEMA cites the criteria from the PAPPG at page 181-182 regarding slope stability which states, [l]f the site is unstable and there is evidence of pre-disaster instability after the facility was constructed, restoration to the facility's integral ground is ineligible. In its response to FEMA's first appeal denial, the Subrecipient mirrors the same arguments made for seven projects appealed under FEMA-47 69-DR-CA, California Severe Winter Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides (DR-47 69) that occurred in 2024. The Subrecipient describes that the claimed damage is unprecedented because a much deeper landslide, now known as the Altamira Landslide, has been activated by DR-4699. Previously considered dormant, the Altamira Landslide is hundreds of feet below and encompasses the historically active Landslide Complex. Further, the Subrecipient explains, the unprecedented acceleration of movement in the Landslide Complex is attributed to Weather Whiplash. To support its stance, the Subrecipient references reports from the first appeal by Cotton Shires and Associates (CSA) dated March 16, 2025 and states, [t]he Altamira Landslide is not just a simple expansion [emphasis] of an existing group of landslides, it is an entirely different, larger, and deeper landslide with much broader boundaries (including the new coastline offshore), nearly twice as deep as the depth of historic landslide movement in some areas and with unprecedented rate of movement (Enclosure 1, Page 72). Cal OES observes that although the most recent CSA reports describe the developing understanding of the Altamira Landslide, CSA also continues to detail that the landslide has accelerated from a previous rate of slide. In the report dated March 16, 2025, CSA provides a graphical representation of GPS monitoring points within the Altamira Landslide that began with minimal creep and then accelerated its movement in 2018, as the first of three inflection points. The report states, Between the October 2018 and October 2019 GPS readings (first inflection point), an acceleration of creep movement is evident .... The graph includes I-4 Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr. Page4 GPS monitoring point AB-59, which has been the fastest moving point and is not surprisingly in the center of the entire Altamira Landslide mass" (Enclosure 1, Page 7 6). The Subrecipient's second appeal provides additional discussion about enlarged landslide scarps and recent GPS monitoring that demonstrate the significant changes in landslide activity of the Landslide Complex following the 2024 winter storms. Scarps have grown substantially since January/February 2024, with some reaching 6-8 feet in height and causing severe infrastructure impacts, including a Southern California Edison (SCE) power pole displacement (Enclosure 1, Page 10). In a comparison of GPS data collected since 2007, the Subrecipient describes that extraordinary displacement rates never previously documented are evident. Survey monuments recorded movements of up to 3.09 feet over 4.5 years, with velocities accelerating from 0.22-0.67 feet/year to as high as 3.9 feet/year in mid-2023. The Subrecipient indicates these findings, corroborated by roadway, trail, and utility distress, demonstrate that the landslide activity is not static or pre-existing but has intensified dramatically, posing immediate threats to public safety and critical infrastructure. Unfortunately, from the perspective of Cal OES, the Subrecipient's analysis indicates that much of the GPS movement discussed is identified prior to the declared disaster in 2023. Cal OES observes that the Subrecipient's second appeal does provide recent and compelling evidence of the measures it has taken since the disasters of DR- 4699 and DR-47 69 to slow the rate of landslide movement are both quantifiable and effective. As part of this new information, the Subrecipient provides a table that compares average movement per week for many of the landslides within the complex, dating from each October 2022 through to 2025. However, the necessity and significant expense of these measures do not, in themselves, justify eligibility that would supersede the pre-existing conditions of instability. Cal OES notes that even in this additional presentation of information, each of the described individual landslides within the Landslide Complex demonstrates average weekly movement in 2022, prior to the claimed disaster in 2023 (Enclosure 1, Page 21 ). Lastly, the Subrecipient's second appeal asserts that, "nowhere in the Stafford Act does it state that pre-existing conditions are ineligible for disaster recovery" (Enclosure 1, page 24). While it may be true that the Stafford Act does not contain an explicit blanket prohibition of pre-existing conditions, FEMA policy is governed by a framework of regulations including the Stafford Act, the PAPPG, 44 CFR, and other federal regulations. Instead, FEMA policy more simply requires that applicants demonstrate claimed damage is the result of the disaster. I-5 Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr . Page 5 Cal OES recognizes that the Subrecipient has effectively demonstrated that landslide activity has accelerated prior to and in the wake of the declared disaster. Also, the Subrecipient has been effective in slowing the rate of landslide movement. However, work related to acceleration or previously unseen behavior of a landslide that was clearly active prior to the disaster does not meet the eligibility requirements of FEMA PA . Cal OES concurs with FEMA's conclusion that the damage necessitating the work claimed is not the result of the declared incident in accordance with 44 CFR § 206.223(0) (1 ). Further, this same evidence of pre-existing instability is also a cause for ineligibility, consistent with the P APPG at pages 181-182, discussed earlier. Recommendation Based on careful analysis, documentation review, and in accordance with relevant laws, regulations, and policies, Cal OES is unable to support the Subrecipient's appeal. In accordance with 44 CFR § 206.206(b)(l )(ii)(C), Cal OES respectfully requests a response to this appeal within 90 days from receipt of this letter. If you require additional information regarding this correspondence, please contact Mr. Robert Larsen, State Public Assistance Officer, at (916) 600-3126. Sincerely, GSigned by : t!:A6~9~CA ELI OWEN Assistant Director, Recovery Operations Alternate Governor's Authorized Representative Enclosures: 1. City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2nd Appeal for PN 730185, Appeal-3616 2. FEMA 1st Appeal Determination Response to PN 730185 3. Project Reports from Grants Portal for PN 730185 4. FEMA Determination Memorandum of PN 730185, DM-PRJ-34336 5. Cal OES 1st Appeal Request to FEMA, Appeal-1 67 4 cc: Ara Micheal Mihranian, City Manager, City of Rancho Palos Verdes wm J-1 GAVIN NEWSOM GOVERNOR Cal OBS GQVER:N OFt 'S OFF ICE OF" E'MER.GENCY SER.VlCES January 23, 2026 Mr. Colt Hagmaier Assistant Administrator, Recovery Directorate Via: Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr., Regional Administrator Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region IX U.S. Department of Homeland Security 1111 Broadway Street, Suite 1200 Oakland, California 94607 Subject: Second Appeal -Project Numbers 754844 FEMA-47 69-DR-CA, California Severe Winter Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides Cal OES ID: 037-59514 FEMA ID: 037-59514-00 CHRISTINA CURRY ACTING DIRECTOR Subrecipient: City of Rancho Palos Verdes (Los Angeles County) Cal OES Log: COR-010272 FEMA Log: FA0131/DM-PRJ-34154 Grants Portal Appeal No: Appeal-3622 Dear Mr. Hagmaier The California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) would like to thank the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for its ongoing partnership in serving California communities. On December 1, 2025, Cal OES received the enclosed letter of the same date from the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (Subrecipient) (Enclosure 1 ). This letter appeals FEMA's first appeal determination to partially deny Public Assistance (PA) funding for Project Number (PN) 754844 (Enclosure 2). FEMA's first appeal determination approved $102,157.16, leaving a balance of $5,322,842.84 in ineligible costs that are now being appealed by the Subrecipient. Cal OES is unable to support the Subrecipient's appeal among several causes, including that the remaining facilities at issue are under the authority of another Federal agency. 3650 SCHRIEVER AVENUE• MATHER, CA 95655 (916) 845-8506 TELEPHONE• (916) 845-8511 FAX www.CalOES.ca.gov J-2 Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr. Page2 FEMA's first appeal determination was uploaded to Grants Portal on October 8, 2025. In accordance with Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR) § 206.206(b) (2) (ii) (A), the Subrecipient's second appeal for PN 754844 was submitted within 60 calendar days of the upload date in Grants Portal (Enclosure 2). Background In response to FEMA-47 69-DR-CA, California Severe Winter Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides (DR-4769), the Subrecipient claimed work to repair sinkholes around stormwater drains on Hawthorne Boulevard and at the intersection of Rue De La Fleur and Rue De La Pierre. Additionally, the Subrecipient made claims for repairs along Palos Verdes Drive South that experienced movement as a result of soil saturation from the event. FEMA originally denied the eligibility of the Subrecipient's project with the following reasons: 1. The work claimed is not required as a result of the declared disaster, and the Applicant cannot demonstrate the damage was directly caused by DR-4769. 2. The facilities were unstable based on pre-disaster evidence making the ground and facility restoration ineligible. 3. Particular to Palos Verdes Drive South and Hawthorne Boulevard, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), another Federal agency, is legally responsible for the maintenance and repair of these roads (Enclosure 3). First Appeal On June 12, 2025, Cal OES forwarded the Subrecipient's April 25, 2025, first appeal along with a letter stating that it was partially supporting the Subrecipient's claim. Cal OES explained that the claimed work at the intersection of Rue De La Fleur and Rue De La Pierre was eligible for PA as it was outside of the known landslide topography of the area and is a local roadway, not under the authority of the FHWA. However, for the damage at Hawthorne Boulevard and Palos Verdes Drive South, Cal OES agreed with FEMA that pre-existing instability dating back, particularly to 2018, makes that work ineligible per FEMA policy. Additionally, Cal OES reviewed the locations of claimed work on Rancho Palos Verdes Drive South and Hawthorne Boulevard and concurs with FEMA's conclusion that the streets are under the authority of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (Enclosure 4, Page 3-4). In its first appeal, the Subrecipient argued that the damage was not solely due to pre-existing slope instability but was significantly accelerated by winter storm events, FEMA-CA-4699-CA, 2023 February-April Storms (DR-4699) and DR-4769. J-3 Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr. Page3 According to the Applicant, these storms triggered movement in the previously inactive Altamira Landslide. The Applicant further asserts that runoff from the DR- 47 69 event caused the Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex (Landslide Complex) to raft atop the deeper Altamira Landslide, resulting in unprecedented land movement. The Subrecipient demonstrates that the formerly dormant Altamira Landslide was reactivated by record rainfall between 2022 and 2024, following decades of "Weather Whiplash" (hydroclimate volatility) attributed to climate change (Enclosure 4, Page 7). Second Appeal Analysis In response to the Subrecipient's first appeal, FEMA agreed with Cal OES that the claimed repairs at the intersection of Rue De La Fleur and Rue De La Pierre were eligible for PA. For the remaining claimed damage at Palos Verdes Drive South and Hawthorne Boulevard, FEMA reiterated its stance of ineligibility under three arguments. 1. Palos Verdes Drive South and Hawthorne Boulevard are Federal-aid routes under the authority of FHWA, another Federal Agency, and therefore ineligible for PA. 2. The work claimed is not required as a result of the declared disaster, and the Applicant cannot demonstrate the damage was directly caused by DR-4769. 3. The facilities were unstable based on pre-disaster evidence making the ground and facility restoration ineligible. Other Federal Agency Cal OES notes that the Subrecipient's second appeal letter includes all eight projects denied by FEMA for the claimed disaster. The other appealed projects have been addressed in other appeal letters responded to by Cal OES and forwarded to FEMA. The Subrecipient's second appeal letter does not dispute that Palos Verdes Drive South and Hawthorne Boulevard are Federal-aid routes; rather, it focuses on landslide activity in the wake of the disaster. FEMA's first appeal determination also addressed ineligibility issues related to pre-disaster landslide activity and the actual cause of damage. In the following section, Cal OES will respond to both the Subrecipient's second appeal and FEMA's first appeal determination but emphasizes that roadways under the authority of another Federal agency are, first and foremost, ineligible for Public Assistance. This conclusion is consistent with Cal OES's position in the first appeal, where it agreed with FEMA regarding the eligibility issues of claimed work on Palos Verdes Drive South and Hawthorne Boulevard. J-4 Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr. Page4 Result of Declared Incident and Pre-existing Instability Because of a well-documented history of landslide activity prior to DR-47 69, FEMA concludes that the Subrecipient is unable to demonstrate the damage claimed is a result of the declared incident. FEMA describes that the Subrecipient's claimed acceleration of landslide activity pre-dating the declared disaster, further illustrates this point. Citing the Public Assistance Program and Policy Guide {PAPPG) Version 4 {2020) at page 51 and 44 CFR § 206.223(0), FEMA explains the work claimed does not meet this eligibility criteria. FEMA's first appeal determination goes on to describe that restoration of integral ground that supports a facility may be eligible for PA. However, the pre-existing instability that is present in the claimed facilities makes this restoration work ineligible per the PAPPG at page 181-182. In its response to FEMA's first appeal determination, the Subrecipient again describes that the claimed damage is unprecedented because a much deeper landslide, now known as the Altamira Landslide has been activated by DR-4769. Previously considered dormant, the Altamira Landslide is hundreds of feet below and encompasses the historically active Landslide Complex. To support its stance, the Subrecipient references reports from the first appeal by Cotton Shires and Associates (CSA) dated March 16, 2025 and states, [t]he Altamira Landslide is not just a simple expansion [emphasis] of an existing group of landslides, it is an entirely different, larger, and deeper landslide with much broader boundaries {including the new coastline offshore), nearly twice as deep as the depth of historic landslide movement in some areas and with unprecedented rate of movement {Enclosure 1, Page 71). Cal OES observes that although the CSA report describes the developing understanding of the Altamira Landslide, CSA also continues to detail that the landslide has accelerated from a previous rate of slide. In the report dated March 16, 2025, CSA provides a graphical representation of GPS monitoring points within the Altamira Landslide that began with minimal creep and then accelerated its movement in 2018, as the first of three inflection points. The report states, Between the October 2018 and October 2019 GPS readings {first inflection point), an acceleration of creep movement is evident .... The graph includes GPS monitoring point AB-59, which has been the fastest moving point and is not surprisingly in the center of the entire Altamira Landslide mass" {Enclosure 1, Page 75). In a comparison of GPS data collected since 2007, the Subrecipient describes extraordinary displacement rates never previously documented within the J-5 Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr. Pages Landslide Complex. Survey monuments recorded movements of up to 3.09 feet over 4.5 years, with velocities accelerating from 0.22-0.67 feet/year to as high as 3. 9 feet/year in mid-2023 (Enclosure 1, Page 9-10). The Subrecipient indicates these findings, corroborated by roadway, trail, and utility distress, demonstrate that the landslide activity is not static or pre-existing but has intensified dramatically, posing immediate threats to public safety and critical infrastructure. Unfortunately, Cal OES can determine that the Subrecipient's analysis indicates that much of the GPS movement discussed is identified prior to the appealed disaster in 2024. Cal OES observes that the Subrecipient's second appeal does provide recent and compelling evidence that the measures it has taken since the disaster to slow the rate of landslide movement are both quantifiable and effective. As part of this new information, the Subrecipient provides a table that compares average movement per week for many of the landslides within the complex, dating from each October 2022 through to 2025. However, the necessity and significant expense of these measures do not, in themselves, justify eligibility that would supersede the pre-existing conditions of instability. Cal OES notes that even in this additional presentation of information, each of the described individual landslides within the Landslide Complex demonstrates average weekly movement in 2022 and 2023, prior to the claimed disaster in 2024 (Enclosure 1, Page 20). Cal OES recognizes that the Subrecipient has effectively demonstrated that landslide activity has accelerated prior to, and in the wake of, the declared disaster. Also, the Subrecipient has been effective in slowing the rate of landslide movement. However, work related to acceleration or unprecedented behavior of a landslide that was clearly active prior to the disaster does not meet the eligibility requirements of FEMA PA. Cal OES concurs with FEMA's conclusion that the remaining sites of claimed damage, Palos Verdes Drive South and Hawthorne, are under the authority of another Federal Agency and are therefore ineligible for PA. Also, the work claimed is not the result of the declared incident in accordance with 44 CFR § 206.223(0) (1). Lastly, this same evidence of pre-existing instability is also a cause for ineligibility, consistent with the PAPPG at pages 181-182. Recommendation Based on careful analysis, documentation review, and in accordance with relevant laws, regulations, and policies, Cal OES is unable to support the Subrecipient's appeal. In accordance with 44 CFR § 206.206(b) (1) (ii) (C), Cal OES respectfully requests a response to this appeal within 90 days from receipt of this letter. J-6 Mr. Robert J. Fenton, Jr. Page 6 If you require additional information regarding this correspondence, please contact Mr. Robert Larsen, State Public Assistance Officer, at (916) 600-3126. Sincerely, GSigned by : t!:A6~9~CA ELI OWEN Assistant Director, Recovery Operations Alternate Governor's Authorized Representative Enclosures: l. City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2nd Appeal Letter for PN 754844 2. FEMA l st Appeal Determination Response for PN 754844 3. FEMA's Original Determination Memo for PN 754844, DM-PRJ-34154 4. Cal OES l st Appeal Request to FEMA for PN 754844, Appeal-1783 cc : Ara Micheal Mihranian, City Manager, City of Rancho Palos Verdes wm