CC SR 20250401 01 - PVIC Museum Annex Dyda Proposal
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 04/01/2025
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business
AGENDA TITLE:
Consideration to receive and file a report on a proposed Point Vicente Interpretive
Center Museum Annex.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Receive and file a status update report on a proposed Point Vicente Interpretive
Center Museum Annex.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: N/A
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): N/A
ORIGINATED BY: Matt Waters, Senior Administrative Analyst
REVIEWED BY: Dan Trautner, Recreation and Parks Director
APPROVED BY: Catherine Jun, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
A. Museum Annex Proposal by Ken Dyda (page A-1)
B. November 6, 2024 City Council staff report
C. February 21, 2023 City Council staff report
D. November 15, 2022 City Council staff report
E. February 7, 2023 Los Serenos De Point Vicente letter (page E-1)
F. Letter to Department of Toxic Substances Control (page F-1)
G. Department of Toxic Substance Control Response (page G-1)
H. Letter to California Coastal Commission (page H-1)
I. Letter to National Park Service (page I-1)
J. National Park Service Response email (page J-1)
BACKGROUND:
On November 6, 2024, the City Council considered a proposal for a Point Vicente
Interpretive Center Museum Annex from former Mayor Ken Dyda. The proposed annex
would display exhibits from the Palos Verdes Historical Society (PVHS). The PVHS
was founded in 1976 and manages an extensive collection of artifacts and documents,
1
pursues recognition of historical sites in the Palos Verdes area, and conducts
educational lectures and tours. PVHS operated a museum occupying three rooms at
Malaga Cove School until the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District closed the
facility in 2006. Since that time, PVHS has kept its artifacts in storage, with a significant
portion currently stored in a trailer at the Ken Dyda Civic Center.
The PVHS approached the City on October 31, 2022 about identifying a City park
location, specifically Lower Point Vicente next to the Point Vicente Interpretive Center
(PVIC), for an approximately 5,000 square foot museum to permanently house its
collection. The City Council received a report on a proposal from the PVHS on
November 15, 2022(Attachment D). The Ken Dyda Civic Center and Lower Point
Vicente Park were identified in the report as the most feasible locations for the Museum.
PVHS President Dana Graham also made a presentation to the City Council that
evening that included additional details. He stated that PVHS was seeking City Council
endorsement to proceed with submitting a development application for the construction
of an approximately 5,000-square-foot museum at Lower Point Vicente Park, adjacent
to PVIC. PVHS would pay for the construction, and the building would then be deeded
to the City. Furthermore, PVHS would manage and maintain the exhibits while the City
would cover all costs relating to staffing, operation , and ongoing maintenance of the
facility. Mr. Graham stated that it had a major anonymous donor, who had promised to
fund the project if built at Lower Point Vicente Park. Mr. Graham also stated that the
existing Los Serenos Docent program that operates at PVIC could expand and lead
tours of the new facility.
An aerial identifying the proposed location for the museum, located to the north of PVIC,
is shown in green below.
The City Council directed Staff to return with an update that included feedback from
public outreach efforts to determine the level of support for a historical museum and an
analysis of the estimated staffing and operations and maintenance costs for a 5,000
2
square foot facility. The following information was presented to the City Council at its
February 23, 2023 meeting (Attachment C).
Public Outreach and Feedback
The Recreation and Parks Department hosted a public workshop on the proposed
museum on February 1, 2023 at Hesse Park, which consisted of presentations by Staff
and PVHS President Graham, followed by a question-and-answer period. 22 people
attended and were generally positive about the proposal. The following is a summary of
14 comment card responses and general comments received at the public workshop:
Yes No
Is it important that the City of RPV have a historical museum?
12 2
1 2 3 4 5 AVG.
How likely would it be that you would visit a historical museum in
RPV? 1 lowest 5 highest
1 0 2 1 10 4.4
Lower Point
Vicente
Ken Dyda Civic
Center
No
Opinion
What is preferred location for a potential historical
museum?
10 3 1
1 2 3 4 5 AVG.
Indicate your level of support for a historical museum if it was
paid for with private funds but operated and staffed at City
expense. 1 lowest 5 highest.
2
0
0
1
10
4.3
In addition to the workshop, 50 emails were received, of which forty were opposed to
locating a historical museum at Lower Point Vicente Park, and 10 were in favor.
Financial Analysis: Estimated Staffing and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
The following estimated costs were presented to the City Council at its February 21,
2023 meeting. As mentioned previously, PVHS indicated that it would cover the cost of
construction, relying on grants and fundraising with the primary funding coming from an
anonymous donor. PVHS did not provide an estimate for the cost of construction.
PVHS’s proposal called for the City to cover the costs of staffing, operations and
maintenance after construction. Below are estimated annual expenses based on
comparisons to other City facilities.
Proposed Historical Society Museum Estimated
Annual Cost
3
Water $22,700
Gas $1,100
Electricity $14,200
Telephone $1,500
Total Utilities $39,500
1 Recreation Supervisor I $101,100
1 Rec Specialist (28 hrs/wk) $34,200
1 Recreation Leader II (28 hrs/week) $30,800
3 Recreation Leaders I (20 hrs/week) $76,300
Total Staffing Costs (Salary and Benefits) $242,400
Janitorial Services $9,500
Landscaping $37,000
Emergency Repairs/Misc. Repairs $7,000
Alarm Services and Security $14,000
Janitorial Services $4,000
Total Maintenance Costs $71,500
Operating Materials and Supplies $19,000
Exhibit Repairs $6,000
Total Recreation Operation Costs $25,000
Total Staffing and O&M Annual Estimated Costs $378,400*
*These estimated costs are from 2022; current staffing and O&M costs in 2025 are estimated to
be $458,000.
Response from Los Serenos de Point Vicente
The proposal from PVHS called for Los Serenos de Point Vicente to consider expanding
their education and docent services. PVHS President Graham made a presentation to
Los Serenos de Point Vicente in November 2022 about their proposal. Los Serenos de
Point Vicente sent in a response letter on February 7, 2023, stating its formal position
on PVPHS’ proposal, as summarized below (Attachment E):
• Los Serenos de Point Vicente does not oppose PVHS’ wish to build a museum.
• Expressed concern that the topics covered in the proposed museum would be a
duplication of displays at PVIC.
• The proposed Lower Point Vicente location overlaps with the outdoor exhibits
proposed by Los Serenos de Point Vicente and adopted by the City Council in
2017.
• Los Serenos de Point Vicente supports consideration of the Ken Dyda Civic
Center at City Hall, noting that the area has sufficient area to accommodate the
museum, including the possible re-purposing of the Nike missile silos.
• Los Serenos de Point Vicente cannot commit to providing a new museum with
docent support since it is not part of the organization’s mission.
4
• Los Serenos de Point Vicente suggests that if a new museum is approved, the
two organizations should collaborate on the type of exhibits to be displayed to
minimize duplication.
The City Council received and filed the status update report at its February 21, 2023
meeting and provided no additional direction.
On October 1, 2024, Councilmember Bradley requested staff bring back an update on
the proposed museum annex. Former Mayor Ken Dyda, who is also the founder and
former President of the PVHS, made an updated presentation to the City Council
(Attachment A) as an individual, not as a representative of the PVHS. He noted that the
project is titled the Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Annex, not the Palos
Verdes Historical Museum. Below is a depiction of the exterior of the proposed annex:
Excerpt from Presentation
The proposed 5,000 sf annex has a different configuration but is the same approximate
size as the 2023 PVHS proposal. Both proposals include six galleries focusing on the
same topics:
• Flora and Fauna
• Geology
• Archeology
• Early American Era
• Spanish Era
• Contemporary Era
5
Excerpt from Presentation
Below is a depiction of the entrance to the proposed annex:
Excerpt from Presentation
A notable difference between 2022 and current proposal is that the original proposal
was designed as a subterranean structure with most of the building tucked into the
grade. As proposed, the building would be open four days a week (Tu/Th/Sat/Sun) from
9am-5pm and would be an annex to the existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center. Mr.
Dyda informed staff that he is flexible about the precise location for the annex at the
Lower Point Vicente site, but he would not be interested in any other park site.
Mr. Dyda proposed that the building would be run by Recreation and Parks staff and
volunteers, and Los Serenos docents would lead programs and tours. The PVHS would
retain ownership of all artifacts and would be responsible for their curation.
The annex would be financed by donations. Mr. Dyda note d that City Council’s
endorsement of both the design concept and a location would be crucial to securing
6
sufficient funding to develop construction ready documents for City entitlements and
build the facility. Once the building is constructed, the City would accept title to the
building and would be responsible for its maintenance and operation. He noted in his
presentation that he anticipated that funds could be raised for an endowment to cover
all or part of ongoing museum annex expenses. Mr. Dyda stated that his proposed
design, which includes a photo-voltaic roof and cisterns, would result in reduced costs.
DISCUSSION:
The November 11, 2024 report noted that while Lower Point Vicente is an appropriate
site due to its size, relatively flat grade, and sufficient space for additional parking,
certain constraints and concerns would need to be addressed. The report noted that
the proposed museum annex would be subject to review by the Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC), the California Coastal Commission (CCC), and the
National Park Service (NPS). The City Council directed staff to contact those agencies
and report with a project update. Below is a summary of the responses from DTSC,
CCC, and the NPS.
Department of Toxic Substances Control
The expansion of PVIC, which was completed in 2006, was delayed for several years
due to the discovery of lead contamination at the site from a U.S. Army firing range. Any
additional structure would need to be located outside of a lead-contaminated area. This
would need to be confirmed by a geotechnical investigation and approval by DTSC,
which has deed restrictions over the property.
City Staff sent a letter to DTSC personnel outlining the proposed annex and requesting
an initial review and feedback (Attachment F).
DTSC staff responded via email on March 21, 2025 (Attachment G), after consulting
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that the footprint of the former shooting range
does not appear to overlap with the footprint of the proposed development and that lead
concentration levels in those areas were below residential levels.
DTSC offered the following recommendations:
• While lead concentrations found in the area proposed for development were
below residential screening levels for lead and the proposed building location is outside
the footprint of the Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS), DTSC would advise for
contractors to be vigilant while digging or grading. If any bullet casings, metal debris, or
soil staining is observed, they should notify DTSC.
• If any materials are uncovered during work, segregate and/or containerize the
material and work with DTSC on sampling and disposal activities. DTSC may ask for a
short technical document to outline soil handling and disposal procedures.
7
Furthermore, DTSC noted there is no evidence or record of munitions or explosives use
at this property, but included precautionary notes in the event any are discovered on
site.
• Proper health and safety measures are recommended prior to intrusive activities.
If unexploded ordnance and or munitions is/are encountered, follow the 3Rs of
Explosives Safety: Recognize, Retreat and Report: Recognize, when you have
encountered munitions; Retreat, do not approach, touch or disturb a suspect munitions,
safely leave the area and Report, immediately what was found to state and or local law
enforcement – call 911.
DTSC also asked that they be sent any future CEQA documents that may be developed
for this project so they could provide comments and insight.
California Coastal Commission
City Staff sent a letter to California Coastal Commission personnel outlining the
proposed annex and requesting an initial review and feedback (Attachment H). At a
March 17 meeting, CCC staff stated that they had no immediate objection or strong
opinion on the proposed project at this early stage. They did recommend that the City
address the following issues if it chose to go forward:
• Ensuring sufficient setback from the bluff
• Limiting impacts to coastal views
• Ensuring proper zoning review and permitting process with all governing
agencies, including the CCC.
• Ensuring consultation with local Native American tribes
National Park Service
Lower Point Vicente is on the site of a former U.S. Army base and is subject to a federal
Program of Utilization (POU). Staff sent the museum annex proposal and November
11, 2024 staff report to David Siegenthaler, Regional Program Manager of the Federal
Lands to Parks program requesting a determination by the NPS on the proposal’s
compliance and consistency with the POU (Attachment I). He responded via email on
March 19, 2025 (Attachment J). Below is a summary of his response and concerns.
Siegenthaler stated that the original park application notes that the site would be used
as an ocean viewpoint, with picnic areas, and a possible marine interpretive facility. He
noted that the current PVIC museum was intended to be a low-profile building
displaying information relevant to site including displays on local biological species,
geology, Catalina Island and cetacean species. Siegenthaler emphasized that the
existing Interpretive Center was determined to be consistent with the POU because of
its site-specific nature which allows visitors to experience an enriched experience of the
site. He noted that the existing Interpretive enhances the public outdoor recreational use
of Lower Point Vicente.
8
Siegenthaler expressed concern that the new proposal does not fit the criteria described
in the preceding paragraph. He stated that the proposal does not demonstrate how the
annex “would build upon the current Interpretive Center exhibits or why it would be
needed or helpful there.” He questioned if the proposed museum annex’s educational
mission was site specific.
Siegenthaler stated the current Interpretive Center was funded with a grant from the
Land and Water Conservancy Fund (LWCF) which states that the entire park must be
dedicated and maintained for public outdoor recreation. Any proposed buildings would
need to go through a public facility process which would look at whether it clearly
enhances outdoor recreation use in the entire park. He also noted that the proposed
facility would need to be compatible with and support current outdoor recreation uses in
that area. The LWCF process would also require the City to consult with California
Department of Parks and Recreation and the Office of Grants and Local Services if it
wished to proceed with this project.
Siegenthaler also noted that POU deed restrictions for Lower Point Vicente include a
revisionary clause requiring that the property be utilized for public park and recreation
purposed in perpetuity or face potential reclamation by the federal government.
The NPS did review and approve PVIC’s initial construction in 1984 and subsequent
expansion in 2006. NPS did not approve a 2008 proposal by the Annenberg
Foundation to develop an educational public use facility featuring companion animals to
be located at Lower Point Vicente. After several years of pursuing this project, the
Annenberg Foundation formally withdrew its proposal in August 2011. The Annenberg
proposal faced community opposition due to the site’s unique open space feel and
desired passive recreational use of the site, as well as the deed restrictions in the POU
for passive recreation. It is worth noting that the Annenberg proposal was significantly
larger in scope than the annex proposal (approximately 51,000 sq. ft.).
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Financial Update
The November 6, 2024 staff report stated that the proposed annex would be funded by
private donations. Ken Dyda mentioned in his presentation to City Council that evening
that the donations could also fund an endowment that could cover future costs
associated with operating the museum annex. However, during a recent conversation
with Staff, Mr. Dyda stated that the potential major anonymous donor was no longer
interested in contributing to the project, and there was currently no funding available for
the project.
Alternative Location of Project at Ken Dyda Civic Center
9
The Ken Dyda Civic Center was identified as a potential location for the proposed
museum in a November 15, 2022 staff report that analyzed potential City-owned park
sites on a number of factors including sufficient space, slope/grade, parking, and land
use (Attachment D). The report noted that the Ken Dyda Civic Center’s designated land
use is Institutional Public, and City Hall buildings are already located at the site.
Additionally, there is a current Civic Center Master Plan effort ongoing since 2017, and
the Civic Center Advisory Committee (CCAC) has supported the inclusion and display
of historic and culturally significant artifacts on the Civic Center site. The CCAC has
focused on the underground Nike missile silos located at the site’s existing maintenance
yard as a potential future location that could be combined with an above-ground gallery.
As noted previously, however, PVHS has stated that they are only interested in the
Lower Point Vicente location.
Planning Entitlements Review
The subject property at 31501 Palos Verdes Drive West Point is zoned Open Space
Recreational (OR) and is encumbered by the Zoning Overlays, including the Natural
(OC-1), Socio-Cultural (OC-2), and Urban Appearance (OC-3) Overlay Control Districts.
It is currently developed with the Point Vicente Interpretive Center, which was originally
developed in 1984 and was most recently expanded in 2006 pursuant to a Planning -
Commission-approved Mitigated Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit, Coastal
Permit, and a Major Grading Permit. The proposed Point Vicente Interpretive Center
Museum Annex would likely require similar planning entitlements to allow the placement
of a new museum structure and museum use on the site. The decision maker for these
permits would be the City Council, with the Planning Commission providing project
recommendations, as there was a Code Amendment in 2022 (Ord. 666) which
designated the Planning Commission’s role as advisory to the City Council for City
projects.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends the City Council receive and file this report and, if desired, provide
direction on whether and how to proceed with this proposal.
ALTERNATIVES:
In addition to the Staff recommendation, the following alternative actions are available
for the City Council’s consideration:
1. Do not direct staff to proceed with the proposed project.
2. Direct Staff to provide more analysis on the proposed project.
3. Take other action, as deemed appropriate.
10
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
A-9
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-13
A-14
A-15
A-16
A-17
February 7, 2023
Matt Waters
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Department of Recreation and Parks
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Dear Matt,
On behalf of the Los Serenos de Point Vicente Docents, I would like to present our formal
position on the issue of the establishment of a new museum for the Palos Verdes
Historical Society.
First off, we would like to state that Los Serenos de Point Vicente does not oppose the
vision of the Historical Society to construct a suitable facility to display their many artifacts.
That said, we would like to address a few concerns from the presentation given by
Historical Society President Dana Graham to both the Docents and to the City Council in
December 2022.
Los Serenos is concerned that the topics covered in the new museum as proposed would
be a duplication of most of the topics already included in the PVIC museum. The PVIC
museum includes displays on the flora and fauna of the area, but it is not only focused on
whales and whale watching. The PVIC museum also includes displays on the indigenous
peoples, California Missions, Spanish ranchos, Japanese farmers, Marineland, the Point
Vicente lighthouse and its Fresnel lens, geology, and archeology. Our Native Plant
Garden is a comprehensive display of the plant life of the Peninsula.
Los Serenos does not support the location chosen at Lower Point Vicente, as this location
will interfere with the Outside Exhibit Project proposed by Los Serenos as far back as
1970 and adopted by the City Council in the Master Plan for Lower Point Vicente in 2017.
Of the alternate locations reviewed during the council meeting, which were based on a
thorough analysis by staff, Los Serenos would support the city staff recommendation to
consider placing the museum at the Ken Dyda Civic Center. Several sites in that area
would fit the footprint desired by the Historical Society, including remodeling of the former
Nike base underground missile storage room.
Los Serenos cannot commit to supporting the new museum with Docent support to lead
tours, as a new museum is not part of the Mission of Los Serenos de Point Vicente.
Los Serenos suggests that if a new museum is approved that Los Serenos de Point
Vicente and the Historical Society collaborate on the type of exhibits which will be
E-1
presented in the new museum and in the PVIC, with a goal of minimizing duplication as
much as possible.
Thank you for all of the work you and your staff have put in on this project. Los Serenos
looks forward to future discussions about the proposed new museum.
Sincerely,
PAUL FUNK
President
Los Serenos de Point Vicente
E-2
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RECREATION & PARKS
30940 HAWTHORNE BLVD. / RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90275-5391 / (310) 544-5207 / FAX (310) 544-5291 / WWW.RPVCA.GOV
Matt Waters
Senior Administrative Analyst
Recreation and Parks Department
February 12, 2025
Via Email: Eileen.mananian@dtsc.ca.gov
Eileen Mananian
Project Manager
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
5796 Corporate Avenue
Cypress, CA 90630
SUBJECT: Request for initial review and feedback regarding a proposed historical museum
at Lower Point Vicente Park in Rancho Palos Verdes
Dear Ms. Mananian:
I am writing to request your assistance and advice regarding a proposed Point Vicente
Interpretive Center Museum Annex to be located near the existing Point Vicente Interpretive
Center (PVIC) in Rancho Palos Verdes (located at 31501 Palos Verdes Drive West Rancho
Palos Verdes, CA 90275). The proposal was made to the RPV City Council by former Mayor
Ken Dyda in November 2024. A similar proposal was made in 2022 by the Palos Verdes
Historical Society. While the City Council did not take any position on the current proposal, it
did direct staff to reach out to the National Park Service (NPS), Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC), and the California Coastal Commission (CCC) to offer feedback
on the proposed project.
Below is some background information including the initial 2022 proposal and the current
2024 proposal:
Original 2022 Proposal
The Palos Verdes Historical Society (PVHS) approached the City in late 2022 about
identifying a City park location, preferably in Lower Point Vicente Park next to PVIC, for a
Palos Verdes Historical Museum to house and display its extensive collection of artifacts
and documents. PVHS operated a small museum at a school site in Palos Verdes from
1976-2006, but following the closing of that facility, their collection has been in storage.
F-1
CA DTSC: Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Expansion
February 12, 2025
Page 2
PVHS President Dana Graham made a presentation to the City Council on November 15,
2022 that included details about its proposal and the organization’s preference for the
Lower Point Vicente site. He stated that PVHS was seeking City Council endorsement
to proceed with submitting a development application for the construction of an
approximately 5,000-square-foot museum at Lower Point Vicente Park, adjacent to PVIC.
PVHS would pay for the construction and the building would then be deeded to the City.
PVHS would manage and maintain the exhibits while the City would cover all costs
relating to staffing, operation, and ongoing maintenance of the facility.
The proposal included galleries devoted to Native American, Spanish, archeological,
geologic, and other exhibits. An aerial identifying the proposed location for the museum,
located to the north of PVIC, is shown in green below.
The City Council did not take any action on this proposal.
Current 2024 Proposal
On November 6, 2024 the City Council considered an updated proposal to the City Council
for an approximately 5,000 square foot facility that would highlight various aspects of the
Palos Verdes Peninsula with an emphasis on the area’s rich history. The proposal is now
called the Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Annex, not the Palos Verdes
Historical Museum.
Below is a depiction of the exterior of the proposed annex:
F-2
CA DTSC: Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Expansion
February 12, 2025
Page 3
The proposed 5,000 sf annex has a different configuration but is the same approximate
size as the 2022 PVHS proposal. Both proposals included six galleries focusing on the
same topics:
•Flora and Fauna
•Geology
•Archeology
•Early American Era
•Spanish Era
•Contemporary Era
The exhibits would still be from the PVHS collection.
Below is a schematic of the proposed interior:
F-3
CA DTSC: Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Expansion
February 12, 2025
Page 4
The building is proposed to be open four days a week (Tu/Th/Sat/Sun) from 9am-5pm
and would be an annex to the existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center. The preferred
location is in the same general area as the 2022 proposal.
The presentation noted that the building could be run by Recreation and Parks staff and
volunteers. The presentation noted that Los Serenos de Point Vicente docents could lead
programs and tours, which they currently do at the existing Point Vicente Interpretive
Center. The Historical Society would retain ownership of all artifacts and would be
responsible for their curation.
The presentation noted that the annex would be financed by donations, and that once the
building was constructed, the City would accept title to the building and would be
responsible for its maintenance and operation.
The City Council has not taken any action to date regarding approval or rejection of this
proposal. An update on this proposal is tentatively scheduled to be presented to the City
Council on April 15, 2025.
The major expansion of PVIC which was completed in 2006 was delayed for several years
due to the discovery of lead contamination at the site from a former Army firing range.
The City respectfully requests that DTSC staff review the proposal and provide feedback.
Enclosed is a link to the November 6, 2024 presentation of the proposal.
Thank you in advance for reviewing this proposal. Please feel free to reach out to me with
any questions, concerns, and requests for additional information, or to arrange a meeting at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
Matt Waters
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Senior Administrative Analyst
310-544-5218
mattw@rpvca.gov
Enclosures:
November 6, 2024 Presentation
cc:
Ara Mihranian, City Manager
Rancho Palos Verdes City Council
F-4
From:Mananian, Eileen@DTSC
To:Matt Waters
Subject:RE: Review of Proposed Museum annex
Date:Friday, March 21, 2025 5:55:55 PM
Attachments:image004.png
image010.png
image011.png
2024-03 Final RI for Pt. Vicente Soil Contamination - J09CA055804_03.10_0002_a.pdf
PVIC_LUC.pdf
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe!!!.
Hello Matt,
Thanks for following up.
In my review of the regulatory documents, and my discussions with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, I was able to confirm that the footprint of the former shooting range doesn’t appear to be
on the footprint of the proposed development. Concentrations of lead in those areas were well below
residential screening levels. Additionally, I checked the Land Use Covenant, and by the figures
presented in the LUC and the proposed location of your development, it appears that it’s outside of
the footprint of the restricted area. Therefore, there shouldn’t be any restrictions on soil movement in
the proposed location.
However, a few things to keep in mind based on historical activities:
While lead concentrations found in the area proposed for development were below residential
screening levels for lead, and the proposed building location is outside the footprint of the
Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS), DTSC would advise for contractors to be vigilant while
digging or grading. If any bullet casings, metal debris, or soil staining is observed, please notify
DTSC.
If any materials are uncovered during work, segregate and/or containerize the material and
work with DTSC on sampling and disposal activities. We may ask for a short technical
document to outline soil handling and disposal procedures.
Note - There is no evidence or record of use of munitions or explosives at this property, however I’m
including this precautionary note for all FUDS that we work on. Proper health and safety measures
are recommended prior to intrusive activities. If unexploded ordnance and or munitions is/are
encountered, follow the 3Rs of Explosives Safety: Recognize, Retreat and Report: Recognize, when
you have encountered munitions; Retreat, do not approach, touch or disturb a suspect munitions,
safely leave the area and Report, immediately what was found to state and or local law enforcement
– call 911.
It would be great to be sent any future CEQA documents that may be developed for this project.
DTSC staff can provide insight/comments to help the project along.
G-1
I’ve attached the Remedial Investigation Report and the Land Use Covenant for your reference.
Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss.
Eileen Mananian (she/her/hers)
Branch Chief
Brownfields, Enforcement, and Military Solutions
Site Mitigation and Restoration Program
714 484-5349
eileen.mananian@dtsc.ca.gov
Department of Toxic Substances Control
5796 Corporate Avenue
Cypress, California 90630
California Environmental Protection Agency
From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2025 12:03 PM
To: Mananian, Eileen@DTSC <Eileen.Mananian@dtsc.ca.gov>
Subject: RE: Review of Proposed Museum annex
Hi Eileen, Good afternoon and hope you’re doing well. I’m following up on your review of the proposed museum annex. Hoping to finalize my report including DTSC’ response by the end of the day or early Monday. Thanks so much,Hi Eileen,
Good afternoon and hope you’re doing well. I’m following up on your
review of the proposed museum annex. Hoping to finalize my report
including DTSC’ response by the end of the day or early Monday.
Thanks so much,
Matt
Matt Waters
Senior Administrative Analyst
____________________________________________
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Department
G-2
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
www.rpvca.gov
mattw@rpvca.gov - (310) 544-5218 p
From: Mananian, Eileen@DTSC <Eileen.Mananian@dtsc.ca.gov>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 10:27 AM
To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>
Subject: RE: Review of Proposed Museum annex
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe!!!.
Hi Matt – yes, I’ll send you an email this week. I’ll check in with Army Corps or Engineers to see if
there’s any input from them before I send you the email.
Eileen
From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 4:23 PM
To: Mananian, Eileen@DTSC <Eileen.Mananian@dtsc.ca.gov>
Subject: FW: Review of Proposed Museum annex
Hi Eileen, Good afternoon. Following up on our conversation a couple of weeks ago about the proposal for a museum annex at Lower Point Vicente in Rancho Palos Verdes. Our City Council has jumped moved the date for this item from April 15 to Hi Eileen,
Good afternoon. Following up on our conversation a couple of weeks
ago about the proposal for a museum annex at Lower Point Vicente in
Rancho Palos Verdes. Our City Council has jumped moved the date
for this item from April 15 to April 1 (no fooling) so I’m hoping to get your
response by the end of the week or early next week if possible so I can
incorporate it into the staff report.
G-3
Thanks so much and please feel free to reach out to me with any
questions.
Sincerely.
Matt Waters
Senior Administrative Analyst
____________________________________________
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Department
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
www.rpvca.gov
mattw@rpvca.gov - (310) 544-5218 p
From: Matt Waters
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 11:03 AM
To: Eileen.mananian@dtsc.ca.gov
Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Review of Proposed Museum annex
To Eileen Mananian:
I am emailing you today to request a review of a proposed historical
museum annex to be located near the existing Point Vicente Interpretive
Center (PVIC) in Rancho Palos Verdes. The proposal was made to the
Rancho Palos Verdes City Council in November 2024. While the
Council did not take any position on the proposal at that meeting, it did
direct staff to reach out to the National Park Service (NPS), Department
G-4
of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and the California Coastal
Commission (CCC) to review the proposal and offer feedback and
guidance. An update on this proposal is tentatively scheduled to be
presented to the City Council on April 15, 2025.
A letter is attached with additional information.
Thank you and please reach out with any questions or concerns.
Matt Waters
Senior Administrative Analyst
____________________________________________
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Department
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
www.rpvca.gov
mattw@rpvca.gov - (310) 544-5218 p
G-5
Matt Waters
Senior Administrative Analyst
Recreation and Parks Department
February 12, 2025
Via Email: Jeffrey.palm@coastal.ca.gov
Jeffrey Palm
Coastal Program Analyst
California Coastal Commission
301 E. Ocean Blvd Suite 300
Long Beach, CA 90802
SUBJECT: Request for initial review and feedback regarding a proposed historical museum
at Lower Point Vicente Park in Rancho Palos Verdes
Dear Mr. Palm:
I am writing to request your assistance and advice regarding a proposed Point Vicente
Interpretive Center Museum Annex to be located near the existing Point Vicente Interpretive
Center (PVIC) in Rancho Palos Verdes (located at 31501 Palos Verdes Drive West Rancho
Palos Verdes, CA 90275). The proposal was made to the RPV City Council by former Mayor
Ken Dyda in November 2024. A similar proposal was made in 2022 by the Palos Verdes
Historical Society. While the City Council did not take any position on the current proposal, it
did direct staff to reach out to the National Park Service (NPS), Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC), and the California Coastal Commission (CCC) to offer feedback
on the proposed project.
Below is some background information including the initial 2022 proposal and the current
2024 proposal:
Original 2022 Proposal
The Palos Verdes Historical Society (PVHS) approached the City in late 2022 about
identifying a City park location, preferably Lower Point Vicente Park next to the existing Point
Vicente Interpretive Center, for a Palos Verdes Historical Museum to house and display its
extensive collection of artifacts and documents. PVHS operated a small museum at a
school site in Palos Verdes from 1976-2006, but following the closing of that facility, their
collection has been in storage.
H-1
PVHS President Dana Graham made a presentation to the City Council on November 15,
2022 that included details about its proposal and the organization’s preference for the
Lower Point Vicente site. He stated that PVHS was seeking City Council endorsement
to proceed with submitting a development application for the construction of an
approximately 5,000-square-foot museum at Lower Point Vicente Park, adjacent to PVIC.
PVHS would pay for the construction and the building would then be deeded to the City.
PVHS would manage and maintain the exhibits while the City would cover all costs
relating to staffing, operation, and ongoing maintenance of the facility.
The proposal included galleries devoted to Native American, Spanish, archeological,
geologic, and other exhibits. An aerial identifying the proposed location for the museum,
located to the north of PVIC, is shown in green below.
The City Council did not take any action on this proposal.
Current 2024 Proposal
On November 6, 2024 the City Council considered an updated proposal to the City Council
for an approximately 5,000 square foot facility that would highlight various aspects of the
Palos Verdes Peninsula with an emphasis ono the area’s rich history. The proposal is now
called the Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Annex, not the Palos Verdes
Historical Museum.
Below is a depiction of the exterior of the proposed annex:
H-2
The proposed 5,000 sf annex has a different configuration but is the same approximate
size as the 2022 PVHS proposal. Both proposals included six galleries focusing on the
same topics:
• Flora and Fauna
• Geology
• Archeology
• Early American Era
• Spanish Era
• Contemporary Era
The exhibits would still be from the PVHS collection.
Below is a schematic of the proposed interior:
H-3
The building is proposed to be open four days a week (Tu/Th/Sat/Sun) from 9am-5pm
and would be an annex to the existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center. The preferred
location is in the same general area as the 2022 proposal.
The presentation noted that the building could be run by Recreation and Parks staff and
volunteers. The presentation noted that Los Serenos de Point Vicente docents could lead
programs and tours, which they currently do at the existing Point Vicente Interpretive
Center. The Historical Society would retain ownership of all artifacts and would be
responsible for their curation.
The presentation noted that the annex would be financed by donations, and that once the
building was constructed, the City would accept title to the building and would be
responsible for its maintenance and operation.
The City Council has not taken any action to date regarding approval or rejection of this
proposal. An update on this proposal is tentatively scheduled to be presented to the City
Council on April 15, 2025.
The proposed annex is located within the California Coastal Zone. The City respectfully
requests that California Coastal Commission staff review the proposal and provide
feedback.
Enclosed is a link to the November 6, 2024 presentation of the proposal.
Thank you in advance for reviewing this proposal. Please feel free to reach out to me with
any questions, concerns, and requests for additional information, or to arrange a meeting at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
Matt Waters
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Senior Administrative Analyst
310-544-5218
mattw@rpvca.gov
Enclosures:
November 6, 2024 Presentation
cc:
Ara Mihranian, City Manager
Rancho Palos Verdes City Council
H-4
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RECREATION & PARKS
30940 HAWTHORNE BLVD. / RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90275-5391 / (310) 544-5207 / FAX (310) 544-5291 / WWW.RPVCA.GOV
Matt Waters
Senior Administrative Analyst
Recreation and Parks Department
February 12, 2025
Via Email: David_Siegenthaler@nps.gov
David Siegenthaler
Regional Program Manager
Federal Lands to Parks
National Parks Service
909 First Ave, Suite 500
Seattle Washington 98104
SUBJECT: Request for initial review and feedback regarding a proposed historical museum
at Lower Point Vicente Park in Rancho Palos Verdes and a determination on its compliance
with the existing Program of Utilization (POU).
Dear Mr. Siegenthaler:
I am writing to request your assistance and advice regarding a proposed Point Vicente
Interpretive Center Museum Annex to be located near the existing Point Vicente Interpretive
Center (PVIC) in Rancho Palos Verdes (located at 31501 Palos Verdes Drive West Rancho
Palos Verdes, CA 90275). The proposal was made to the RPV City Council by former Mayor
Ken Dyda in November 2024. A similar proposal was made in 2022 by the Palos Verdes
Historical Society. While the City Council did not take any position on the current proposal, it
did direct staff to reach out to the National Park Service (NPS), Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC), and the California Coastal Commission (CCC) to offer feedback
on the proposed project and its potential constraints and concerns. The City is requesting a
determination by the NPS on the proposal’s compliance with the POU.
Below is some background information including the initial 2022 proposal and the current
2024 proposal:
Original 2022 Proposal
The Palos Verdes Historical Society (PVHS) approached the City in late 2022 about
identifying a City park location, preferably in Lower Point Vicente Park next to PVIC for a
Palos Verdes Historical Museum to house and display its extensive collection of artifacts
I-1
NPS/Siegenthaler: Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Expansion Project
February 12, 2025
Page 2
and documents. PVHS operated a small museum at a school site in Palos Verdes from
1976-2006, but following the closing of that facility, their collection has been in storage.
PVHS President Dana Graham made a presentation to the City Council on November 15,
2022 that included details about its proposal and the organization’s preference for the
Lower Point Vicente site. He stated that PVHS was seeking City Council endorsement
to proceed with submitting a development application for the construction of an
approximately 5,000-square-foot museum at Lower Point Vicente Park, adjacent to PVIC.
PVHS would pay for the construction and the building would then be deeded to the City.
PVHS would manage and maintain the exhibits while the City would cover all costs
relating to staffing, operation, and ongoing maintenance of the facility.
The proposal included galleries devoted to Native American, Spanish, archeological,
geologic, and other exhibits. An aerial identifying the proposed location for the museum,
located to the north of PVIC, is shown in green below.
The City Council did not take any action on this proposal.
Current 2024 Proposal
On November 6, 2024 the City Council considered an updated proposal to the City Council
for an approximately 5,000 square foot facility that would highlight various aspects of the
Palos Verdes Peninsula with an emphasis on the area’s rich history. The proposal is now
called the Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Annex, not the Palos Verdes
Historical Museum.
I-2
NPS/Siegenthaler: Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Expansion Project
February 12, 2025
Page 3
Below is a depiction of the exterior of the proposed annex:
The proposed 5,000 sf annex has a different configuration but is the same approximate
size as the 2022 PVHS proposal. Both proposals included six galleries focusing on the
same topics:
• Flora and Fauna
• Geology
• Archeology
• Early American Era
• Spanish Era
• Contemporary Era
The exhibits would still be from the PVHS collection.
Below is a schematic of the proposed interior:
I-3
NPS/Siegenthaler: Point Vicente Interpretive Center Museum Expansion Project
February 12, 2025
Page 4
The building is proposed to be open four days a week (Tu/Th/Sat/Sun) from 9am-5pm
and would be an annex to the existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center. The preferred
location is in the same general area as the 2022 proposal.
The presentation noted that the building could be run by Recreation and Parks staff and
volunteers. The presentation noted that Los Serenos de Point Vicente docents could lead
programs and tours, which they currently do at the existing Point Vicente Interpretive
Center. The Historical Society would retain ownership of all artifacts and would be
responsible for their curation.
The presentation noted that the annex would be financed by donations, and that once the
building was constructed, the City would accept title to the building and would be
responsible for its maintenance and operation.
The City Council has not taken any action to date regarding approval or rejection of this
proposal. An update on this proposal is tentatively scheduled to be presented to the City
Council on April 15, 2025.
The City respectfully requests that the National Park Service review the proposal and
offer a determination on its compliance with the POU.
Enclosed is a link to the November 6, 2024 presentation of the proposal.
Thank you in advance for reviewing this proposal. Please feel free to reach out to me with
any questions, concerns, and requests for additional information, or to arrange a meeting at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
Matt Waters
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Senior Administrative Analyst
310-544-5218
mattw@rpvca.gov
Enclosures:
November 6, 2024 Presentation
cc:
Ara Mihranian, City Manager
Rancho Palos Verdes City Council
I-4
From:Siegenthaler, David
To:Matt Waters
Cc:Ara Mihranian; CC
Subject:RE: Review of proposal historical museum at Lower Point Vicente - FLP and LWCF 06-00792
Date:Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:53:00 AM
Attachments:image002.jpg
image003.jpg
image004.jpg
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe!!!.
Hi Matt,
Thank you for submitting this proposal to us for our review regarding its consistency with the
Program of Utilization for Lower Point Vicente Park.
Although museums may be legitimate public park and recreation facilities consistent with
programs of utilization in some circumstances, I have questions about this proposal’s
consistency with the Program of Utilization for Lower Point Vicente.
The original application for the Park land states in its suitability and Program of Utilization
sections, in brief, that the purpose is to “…use the site as an ocean vista lookout, with
picnicking area and possible marine interpretive facility.” It further states that the intention is
for “open space preservation for recreation”, preserve “a dramatic view of the Pacific Ocean”,
offer “marine oriented recreation pursuits.” Regarding the interpretive structure, it was to
“house information on attributes of the site and the marine environment…have a low profile…
and provide information related to biological species found at the site, geologic phenomena of
the Palos Verdes area, Catalina Island, cetacean activities along the coastline,” etc. The
existing Interpretive Center at Lower Point Vicente is oriented to interpretation of that specific
site, helps visitors understand and appreciate the site, and enables a richer first-hand
experience of it. In short, the Interpretive Center enhances and facilitates the public outdoor
recreation use of the site. Those characteristics, plus the particular character of the site, fulfill
the basic criteria we use to determine if a museum would be a fitting component of a Program
of Utilization.
I am not sure if the new museum proposal fits those criteria. The first iteration of the proposal
did not appear to aim to fulfill a purpose intended to help achieve the Program of Utilization. It
appears the proposal was changed somewhat to identify more with the current Interpretive
Center, however no mention is made of how the new museum would build upon the current
Interpretive Center exhibits or why it would be needed or helpful there. I don’t get the sense
that the museum depends upon that specific location – it’s not apparent that it takes
particular advantage of the site’s special attributes for its educational mission, or that it is
intended to prepare the visitor to go outside and have a richer experience of that particular
J-1
place. Its potential visual impact to the open space and ocean vistas that park was meant to
preserve is not discussed.
The current Interpretive Center and other facilities were assisted with a grant from the Land
and Water Conservation Fund. The conditions of a Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)
grant require that the entire park must be dedicated and maintained in public outdoor
recreation. So the open space character of the park is once again emphasized. But if buildings
are proposed to be constructed within a LWCF Act section 6(f)(3) protected boundary (which
this would be) which are supportive of the public outdoor recreation purpose of the park, there
is a “Public Facility” process that may allow such construction. The main criterion for allowed
public facilities in the LWCF program is stated as:
“Public facility requests will only be concurred with if the public facility clearly
enhances or benefits outdoor recreation use of the entire park, and the facility is
compatible with and supportive of the outdoor recreation resources and opportunities
of the LWCF-assisted area.”
The Public Facility process in LWCF would require the City to consult with the California
Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Grants and Local Services (which administers
the LWCF State Assistance Program) to obtain concurrence in the construction.
If the City wishes to proceed with constructing the museum within Lower Point Vicente Park as
an extension of the Interpretive Center, please address the concerns mentioned above.
Perhaps the design of the structure and its function could be further refined to clarify its
usefulness to the purposes of the park. As you know, there are conditions in the deed,
including a federal reversionary clause, that funders of the project would need to know about. I
know RPV intends to keep the park in public park and recreation area use in perpetuity, so
reversion is not at all likely, but the disclosure would be important nevertheless.
I’d be glad to talk with you further about this if you’d like.
Thanks,
David
David Siegenthaler
Regional Program Manager
Federal Lands to Parks
National Park Service
909 First Avenue, Suite 500
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206) 220-4083
J-2
From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 4:29 PM
To: Siegenthaler, David <David_Siegenthaler@nps.gov>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Review of proposal historical museum at Lower Point Vicente
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening
attachments, or responding.
Dear Mr. Siegenthaler:
Good afternoon. I’m following up on my February 12 email (see below
and attached) regarding the proposed historical museum annex at
Lower Point Vicente. The City is requesting a determination by the NPS
on the proposal’s compliance with the Program of Utilization. The City
Council has moved this item from April 15 to April 1 so it would be
helpful if I could received NPS’ response by early next week if possible.
I appreciate your help and please feel free to contact me with any
questions/
Sincerely,
Matt Waters
Senior Administrative Analyst
____________________________________________
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Department
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
www.rpvca.gov
J-3
mattw@rpvca.gov - (310) 544-5218 p
From: Matt Waters
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 11:00 AM
To: David_Siegenthaler@nps.gov
Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Review of proposal historical museum at Lower Point Vicente
Dear Mr. Siegenthaler,
I am emailing you today to request a review of a proposed historical
museum annex to be located near the existing Point Vicente Interpretive
Center (PVIC) in Rancho Palos Verdes. The proposal was made to the
Rancho Palos Verdes City Council in November 2024. While the
Council did not take any position on the proposal at that meeting, it did
direct staff to reach out to the National Park Service (NPS), Department
of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and the California Coastal
Commission (CCC) to review the proposal and offer feedback and
guidance. The City is requesting a determination by the NPS on the
proposal’s compliance with the Program of Utilization. An update on
this proposal is tentatively scheduled to be presented to the City Council
on April 15, 2025.
A letter is attached with additional information.
Thank you and please reach out with any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Matt Waters
J-4
Senior Administrative Analyst
____________________________________________
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Department
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
www.rpvca.gov
mattw@rpvca.gov - (310) 544-5218 p
J-5