The URL can be used to link to this page

20221115 Late CorrespondenceTO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2022 SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA _____________________________________________________________________ Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material presented for tonight’s meeting. Item No. G J 4 5 Description of Material Email exchange between Principal Engineer Dragoo and Madeleine McJones Corrections to Attachment A (Gensler Contract Amendment 1) Emails from: Carolynn Petru; Katrina Vanderlip Email exchanges between City Manager Mihranian and: Kit Song and Rayne Sherman; Mickey Rodich Emails from: Suzanne Mackey; Jessica Vlaco; Robert and Donna Lauck; Karen Smith; Gail and Charles Emery; James and Elizabeth Stewart; Mark Morgan; Janet Furusho Zupke ** PLEASE NOTE: Materials attached after the color page(s) were submitted through Monday, November 14, 2022.** Respectfully submitted, _______________ Teresa Takaoka L:\LATE CORRESPONDENCE\2022\2022 Coversheets\20221115 additions revisions to agenda.docx CITY OF v~ .p<) "' ~ RANCHO PALOS VERDES From: Ron Dragoo Sent: To: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 4:02 PM homecoding@gmail.com Cc: CC; CityClerk Subject: RE: On the Environmental Impact Study Hello Madeleine, Thank you for reaching out to us. The document you searched was not the Environmental Study. The Environmental Study (draft EIR) for the Portuguese Bend Landslide Mitigation Project is being prepared and has not been released yet. It is in the process of being developed and will be release shortly after the new year for public review. You will have an opportunity to review the draft EIR when it is released and provide comments to the City. Every comment received will be reviewed and addressed, but we don't have an Environmental Study yet. The Link you provide is for an agreement with a technical specialist that will help the City with a variety of technical issues including landslide grants, environmental related issues, design issues, etc. We will notify all interested parties when the draft EIR has been released through the City's Listserve Noticing, and other social media platforms. Thank you again for contacting us with your thoughts. Best regards, Ron Dragoo, PE Principal Engineer Some members of the City's workforce are working remotely during this time. Inquiries will continue to be reviewed on a daily basis. Please be patient with us as there may be delays or minor inconveniences in responding to your inquiry. City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. Appointments are strongly encouraged, and virtual appointments are available. Many services are available online, including plan check review services. To schedule an appointment, visit the Staff Directory on the City website to find the appropriate department. From: Madeleine McJones <homecoding@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 11:49 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: On the Environmental Impact Study This is addressing your Environmental Study I searched this document as to ocean and sea level rise and nothing is included. How can you address this project without doing any studies on sea level rise and how that will back flood your equipment? The ocean is going to rise the harbor department has planned for this but this plan is just draining water into the sea and not showing any changes in the sea level. How do you take this out of the project when the sea action is clearly part of this problem as the Army Engineers made it clear about the toe of the slide years ago, and Robert Douglas 1 books are before sea level changes. The city will need new ocean level and errosion studies to plan for the future. As the water rises this will impact your plans, costs and change the dynamics of pumping and upwelling on the coastal bluffs. https://rpv.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view id=S&event id=2094&meta id=108109 Madeleine McJones 3102134392 #3 Tangerine Road SURF ZONE-3fil! Subcommittee Meeting Council member Dyda introduced the topic for the evening "Oceanography" Romi explained the order of the meeting. INTRODUCTIONS Ray Mathys PowerPoint presentation Questions on presentation: 1. How deep is slide plane? Vari 2• J~f.~.rJt~t(~:t19~l?Ir~: • ~!. pq~~!ne.~~.~~ Ancient history with no ocean nse included • Robert Douglas's ook discusses day and movement can the experts talk about surf action; wave actions is cutting the toe which keeps repeating and thus the slide moves; also ground water lubricates the slide and the slide moves, • What would shoreline look like if reefs were installed? l} Dewatering and remove water is the most important 2) keep water out then install reef to prevent soil from being removed. • Kelvin found a line to Army Corps report • How does loading the toe of the slide work? Not well so far-no calculations performed but F=ma is still true so when calculated the correct F (weight) placed at the toe of the slide. The ma would be achieved to accomplish equllibrium. 2 Subject: FW: Item J Gensler Contract Amendment Attachments: Att A Gensler Contract Amendment No. 1 revised.docx; 11-15 Memo to CC re Gensler Agreement.docx From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 5:44 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Item J Gensler Contract Amendment Dear Mayor Bradley and City Council Members, Good evening. Item Jon tomorrow night's agenda regarding the amendment for added services with Gensler had a error in the contract amount in Attachment A. Attached is a memo explaining the change as well as a revised agreement which will be included as late correspondence tomorrow. Sincerely, Matt Waters Matt Waters Senior Admin Analyst mattw@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5218 Address: 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov ~ C.£.liTON f!'!'."~ Google Play nk>il rnessa9c' contains information belonc1ing to tho City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which rmy bo privileged, cor;[k1r,nti,.1L ,Hid/or protected from discios1.we. The information 1s intended only for· use of the individual or entity ,·,dnX',L Unil11tiwrizcd dissernin,1tion, dist1·ibution, 01· copying is st!'ictiy pmhibitod. lf you rec1:ived this email in error, or nol an intcnciccl recipient, please notify the sender irnmccliatcly. Thank you for your assistance and C(){JperdtiOI), City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. Appointments are strongly encouraged, and virtual appointments are available. Many services are available online, including plan check review services. To schedule an appointment, visit the Staff Directory on the City website to find the appropriate department. Some employees may be working remotely. Please be patient with us as there may be delays or minor inconveniences in responding to your inquiry. 1 3, «-° . ' 1,,,. ,.c~ ·P,, v,\Ti:Js~~ ~"":-:MD-... l ~f, CITY OF\,_, 01 RANCHO PALOS VERDES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: CC: DATE: SUBJECT: Rancho Palos Verdes City Council Matt Waters, Senior Administrative Analyst Ara Mihranian, City Manager's Office November 14, 2022 Agenda Item J: Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Gensler Since the transmittal of the November 15, 2022 City Council agenda packet last week, it was brought to Staff's attention that the proposed amendment to the professional services agreement with Gensler for added services to complete the preliminary site plans for the Civic Center Master Plan Project had an error in the contract amount. Attachment A erroneously listed $89,280 (Eighty Six Thousand Two Hundred Eighty Dollars} as the total contract amount which includes the original contract plus the proposed amendment for added services. The correct amount is actually $86,600 (Eighty Six Thousand Six Hundred}. A corrected contract will be included as late correspondence. The staff report lists a different total of $89,280 which is also correct because it includes the additional max 10% allowed for reimbursable expenses related to the added services. Attachment A. Revised Attachment A Gensler Contract Amendment No. 1 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CIVIC CENTER PRE-DESIGN SERVICES This AMENDMENT to that certain "PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CIVIC CENTER PRE-DESIGN SERVICES" ("Amendment No. l ") by and between the CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a municipal corporation ("City"), and GENSLER, a California corporation ("Consultant"), is effective as of November 15, 2022. RECITALS A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Services, dated February 15, 2022 ("Agreement"), whereby Consultant agreed to provide identified pre-design services, including preliminary/conceptual site planning, for the purpose of assessing overall Civil Center site constraints and capabilities (the "Services") for a Contract Sum of $59,800.00. The Agreement provided for a one (1) year term from and after the date of the Agreement. B. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to increase the Scope of Services, Exhibit "A," increase the total compensation, and adjust the Term of the Agreement. TERMS 1. Contract Changes. The Agreement is amended as provided herein. Deleted text is indicated in strikethrough and added text in bold italics. "2.1. Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference, but not exceeding the maximum contract amount of .$59,800 (Fifcy, Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars) $86,600 (Eighty Six Thousand Six Hundred Dollars) together with reimbursable expenses approved by City's Contract Officer (including a 10% mark-up to such expenses) (the "Contract Sum")." "3.4. Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one year from the date hereof except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit "D")." "Scope of Services, Exhibit A(I)(A). Consultant shall perform the following identified pre-design services, including preliminary/conceptual site planning, for the purpose of assessing overall Civil Center site constraints and capabilities to assist Griffin Structures in developing a project cost(s) for a Civic Center construction project. Consultant shall engage in six (6) public presentations (including a pre- design workshop, one workshop for City Staff and one workshop for the Civic Center Advisory Committee). Consultant shall preform the following additional services: Preliminary/Conceptual Site Planning updates to prior pre-design deliverables to re-plan radial bar scheme to fit General Government Use program elements within existing civic center 7. 79 acre boundary (Public Safety Zone). Such additional services shall include removal of sheriff,fire department, and parking structure program elements from this plan, but to be retained as an alternate option. Such additional services shall include addition of law enforcement and emergency/public safety components including, but not limited to, Sheriff drop-in office, multi-City Emergency Operations Center, maintenance yard, parking lot (evacuation area), and Park Ranger facilities into Public Safety Zone to address concerns raised by federal agencies. Such additional services shall include up to two (2) public presentations to City's Civic Center Advisory Committee in December 2022 and January 2023, or on an agreeable date." 2. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment, whenever the term "Agreement" appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment to the Agreement. 3. Affirmation of Agreement; Warranty Re Absence of Defaults. City and Consultant each ratify and reaffirm each and every one of the respective rights and obligations arising under the Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that there have been no written or oral modifications to the Agreement other than as provided herein. Each party represents and warrants to the other that the Agreement is currently an effective, valid, and binding obligation. Consultant represents and warrants to City that, as of the date of this Amendment, City is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement. City represents and warrants to Consultant that, as of the date of this Amendment, Consultant is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement. 4. Adequate Consideration. The parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment. 5. Authority. The persons executing this Amendment on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment, and (iv) the entering into this Amendment does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 01203.0005/834383. l -2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. ATTEST: Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP William W. Wynder, City Attorney CITY: CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a municipal corporation David L. Bradley, Mayor CONSULTANT: GENSLER By: ____________ _ Name: Peter Barsuk Title: By: ___________ _ Name: Title: Address: Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT'S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT'S BUSINESS ENTITY. 0 l 203.0005/834383.1 -3- CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On ____ ., 2022 before me, _______ , personally appeared _______ , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _______________ _ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER 0 INDIVIDUAL 0 CORPORA TE OFFICER TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) 0 □ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) LIMITED GENERAL □ □ □ □ □ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER ------------- SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) 0 l 203.0005/834383 .1 DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DA TE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On---~ 2022 before me,------~ personally appeared _______ , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and conect. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _______________ _ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER 0 INDIVIDUAL 0 CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) 0 □ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) LIMITED GENERAL □ □ □ □ □ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER ------------- SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) 0!203.0005/834383. l DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DA TE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Honorable Mayor & City Council - Catzilla <carolynn.petru@gmail.com> Monday, November 14, 2022 6:00 PM cc CityClerk Proposed Palos Verdes Historical Society Museum -Agenda Item No. 4 I am very much in favor of expanding the size, type and quality of the historic exhibits available at Lower Point Vicente Park. However, the approach suggested by the Palos Verdes Historical Society requires some careful consideration. Serious thought must be given to creating a museum complex that tells the rich history of the Palos Verdes Peninsula in a cohesive and logical manner, and, importantly, avoids exhibit duplication and repetitive storytelling. The staff report cites several reasons why a new building makes more sense than expanding the existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center. What is most compelling to me is that the existing museum is simply too small to accommodate more expanded exhibits, unless the Sunset Room is converted to this use, which would be a shame, as indoor meeting spaces are at a premium in our community. The Palos Verdes Historical Society is certainly presenting a tantalizing opportunity to expand the size and quality of the exhibits on public display. I was fortunate to tour the Society's Museum in 2007 before it was packed up and put into storage. Their collection contained a number of rare and remarkable items. It's a shame they've been largely hidden away all these years, especially the California Native American artifacts, the prehistoric fossils and the Vanderlip models. Unfortunately, the City wasn't able at the time to accommodate PVHS's stipulation for the entire collection be housed in a single facility and that all of the artifacts be kept on permanent display. It appears this may still be PVHS's desire. The conceptual floor plan included in the staff report closely mirrors the types of exhibits already contained in the existing PVIC museum. The only topics that don't appear to be duplicated between the two buildings are the history of the whaling industry and the migration of the Pacific gray whale. I'll be very interested to hear more about PVHS's proposal during the presentation on Tuesday night. There will of course be many other issues to be resolved, including the deed restrictions on the property, funding sources, ongoing operations, etc. Hopefully, these can all be sorted out. In the meantime, I suggest the City avoid the concept of having what appears to be two nearly identical museums on the property. City Council may instead want to ask PVHS and the PVIC Docents to collaborate on curating the artifacts and coming up with a plan to split the exhibits between the two buildings so that they tell distinct, yet connected, parts of our larger local history. For example, perhaps the two museums could each cover a different time period. Or, their exhibits could be divided by topic. No doubt there are a variety of approaches that would make sense. There is something else to consider. As stated in the staff report, in addition to the items currently on display at PVIC, there are several other notable historical collections on the Peninsula in search of a suitable place to be preserved and displayed. In addition to the extensive collections held by the Los Serenes de Point Vicente Docents and Yvetta William's Discovery Room, I understand the Vanderlip Family is also looking for a place to display furniture, artwork and other heirlooms that previously resided at Villa Narcissa. The extent to which these separate collections overlap with one another is striking. Shouldn't all of the available resources be figuratively put on the table and made part of the 1 conversation? Even if everything can't be displayed at once, it could be a wonderful opportunity for rotating or seasonal displays that will keep the museums fresh for returning visitors. Thank you for considering my preliminary comments on this matter, and, as always, thank you for your dedicated service to our community. Best regards, Carolynn Petru Rancho Palos Verdes 2 Subject: FW: History museum -----Original Message----- From: katrina vanderlip <katrinavanderlip@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 6:00 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: History museum CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. It is vital to save the Peninsula's splendid and unique history. Saving the best of the past for the future. I have been waiting and hoping the city of Rancho Palos Verdes would find a site and building to house the archives, art and furniture the Vanderlip Family has saved to share with the public. Renaissance antiques and portraits form the Villa Narcissa and collection of leather bound books of the early climate studies of the peninsula etc. This would make possible recreating a room similar to those at the Villa Narcissa and the other early homes built in the 1920s. I am available to help when ever needed Best. Katrina Vanderlip 213 Hedges Lane. PO Box 7 Sagaponack, New York 11962 1 Subject: FW: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster From: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 7:47 PM To: KIT & KWI <kitmsong@yahoo.com>; Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>; David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>; Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>; Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>; Jerry V. Duhovic <jduhovic@hotmail.com>; Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>; Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>; Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>; McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>; Teresa Takaoka <TeriT@rpvca.gov>; Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>; Lincoln Lo <llo@rpvca.gov>; Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov>; James O'Neill <joneill@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster Hi Kit, et Al., We do sincerely apologize for the misunderstanding and miscommunication. The item is being pulled off tomorrow's agenda and continued to December 6. I don't think you need to come out tomorrow evening for that reason. The critical path now is meeting with the neighbors later this week. We'd like to have you onsite but since it's a construction zone it can only happen after work stops in the afternoon. James O'Neil has sent out an email with two dates and meeting times. Whoever can make it please respond to James's email so we can continue the conversation and collaboration. Let me know if you have any further questions. Best, Ara Ara Michael Mihranian City Manager 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 310-544-5202 (telephone) 310-544-5293 (fax) aram@rpvca.gov www.rpvca.gov Do you really need to print this e-mail? , Iv; e-mail contains information belo119in9 l:o the City of Rancho l'alos Ve1·des, which may be p1·ivilened, conficfontial and/or protected from disclosure, The 1s inl:encld only for use of the individual or entity narnE:d. Unauthorized clisserni1v,t:ion, clislribut:ion, or copyinq is strictly prohibited. If you received this e'mail in errnr, or are not. an inl:enclecl recipient, plea,,e notify t11e sender immediately. Thank you fot· your assistance and cooperation. 1 5 14 LJ From: KIT & KWI <kitmsong@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 2:43:39 PM To: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>; David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>; Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>; Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>; Jerry V. Duhovic <jduhovic@hotmail.com>; Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>; Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>; Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>; McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>; Teresa Takaoka <TeriT@rpvca.gov>; Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>; Lincoln Lo <llo@rpvca.gov>; Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov>; James O'Neill <joneill@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster Ara, we are appreciative of pushing this agenda to a future meeting. Several of us had planned to attend the meeting tomorrow evening or participate by Zoom. If there will not be a discussion, we could avoid prolonging the city's meeting tomorrow with requests to speak with your assurance that this will be postponed pending the on-site visit you mention below. Please advise if we should still plan on attending tomorrow in person or via zoom. Best Kit From: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 2:01 PM To: Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net>, CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>, David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>, Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>, Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>, "Jerry V. Duhovic" <jduhovic@hotmail.com>, Kit Song <kitmsong@yahoo.com>, Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>, Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>, Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>, McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>, Teresa Takaoka <TeriT@rpvca.gov>, Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>, Lincoln Lo <llo@rpvca.gov>, Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov>, James O'Neill <joneill@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster Hi Rayne, Thank you for providing us with the updated leadership roster. We will update the City's HOA master roster, as well as the contact list we have on file for this project. It looks like we contacted Joanne Stasso who doesn't appear to be on the current HOA Board -our apologies. 2 That said, in light of the concerns being expressed by several Seaview residents, we are going to recommend continuing this matter to the December 6 City Council meeting to allow time to schedule an onsite meeting with the neighborhood. I have copied Ramzi Awwad, the Public Works Director, who will coordinate, under a separate email, a date and time for an onsite meeting within the coming week. Please be assured that our intention is to work with the neighborhood to make sure we can address the concerns (privacy, noise and security) being raised in advance of the City Council meeting. Thank you, Ara (2 ~'\'\,." ,!77·, \ ······l ',, I . ', ·-,~,,.} 2 <,) ', Ara Michael Mihranian City Man ager ara m@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5202 Address: 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov ► ~lePlay C1ty 1$ upen tr) che pubii<; [!ur 1.r1.g r1:..--,gui:11 Ous1112ss hCJLHS .. 4opc,0tt~:ents ore srro11giy e,i,:,outaye,::( cu1(i v1 ,'tu:::i app');'Hrren ts CHE avaii<J()tt: !\,:any St:•rvi<:t:S ate ovc:1·iobt-;: (dt.iv1e, hL.:!ud/11g pi:tn ch-0ck r,evievi s2,...v<·t'~ T,..> scft!:.?du,·~,. {u; appo•ntnh..'rtt/ v,s,t rh£' Stoft 0 1r:t.':.:.:tcdr: Dt1 che C:Hy Vt'i'b.$ir~ ru find rhe approprJare de,c:·1,-rrni:n c 50,.~h: a:..•,npf~;yee:; ,nay be V8JtkintJ r;2titt.1t.t: 1}'1 P /.2ase bt"' par,·(:n r V/ttt) us as tif::."'t':..., f'li'::ty be delafS ::,,r n;,inot frrce:,iveni~_;11ci)s it'r tespe:ncf,nft re, vour ;r;JuitJ· From: Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06 AM To: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>; David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>; Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>; Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>; Jerry V. Duhovic <iduhovic@hotmail.com>; Kit M. Song <kitmsong@yahoo.com>; Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>; Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>; Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>; Rayne Sherman FIIDA <Rayne@ShermanDesignGroup.net> Subject: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster Importance: High Hi Ara and the RPV City Council, below is the current SeaView Residents Association (SRA} Leadership Roster for your reference and use: Board of Directors: 3 Executive Committee: President: Jerry Duhovic 310-502-8036 Vice President: Rayne Sherman 562-714-3113 Treasurer: Lori Givens 213-280-4249 Secretary: Pam Sherman 310-569-2940 Board Members: Jeff Dorsett Mary Hermens David Potter jedorsett@gmail.com Mary.Hermens@gmail.com DavidQardigm@gmail.com Dan Rouimi danrouimi@yahoo.com Kit Song kitsong@yahoo.com Unofficial Alternate Member Gerry Taccini Rayne Sherman Vice President gtaccini@cox.net SeaView Residents Association 4043 Admirable Dr Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 562/714-3113 Rayne@ShermanDesignGroup.net jduhovic@hotmail.com rayne@ShermanDesignGrouQ.net cdoogirl@cox.net QlanningQros@earthlink.net 4 Subject: FW: Fence Around Ladera Linda Property From: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 5:52 AM To: Mickey Radich <mickeyrodich@yahoo.com>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>; Lincoln Lo <llo@rpvca.gov>; James O'Neill <joneill@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Fence Around Ladera Linda Property Good morning Mickey, This agenda item is being continued to December 6 to allow more time to meet with the residents. To clarify, as approved by the council in 2021, the property will remain enclosed with a fence. A new fence is being installed along the southern slope adjacent to the existing drainage swale. The staircase will also be enclosed with a fence. The existing fence along the top of the slope is proposed to be removed. I hope this is explanation helps. Ara Ara Michael Mihranian City Manager 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 310-544-5202 (telephone) 310-544-5293 (fax) aram@rpvca.gov www.rpvca.gov Do you really need to print this e-mail? r, mdil message• contains information belongin9 to the City of Rancho Palos Ver·dcs, which may be privileged, confidential andjor pi-otcctccl from disclosure. The information is intenclcd oniy for use of the individual or entity namccl. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you received thrs email in error, or arc not an intended recipient, please notify the scncicr immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. LJ From: Mickey Radich <mickeyrodich@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 7:40:18 PM 1 5. To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Fence Around Ladera Linda Property CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. I am against removing any fencing around Ladera Linda. All of the plans and discussions that were had about fencing, staff and City Council both agreed that the complete perimeter of Ladera Linda would be fenced. It seems that staff and City Council are now trying to change what was agreed to originally. Sent from my iPhone 2 From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Council Members, Suzanne Mackey <suemackey2@yahoo.com> Monday, November 14, 2022 5:22 PM cc@rvpca.gov; CityClerk OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. One of the main reasons I chose to live in Rancho Palos Verdes, and specifically in my home within the Seaview community, was because of the natural peace and quiet. The nature preserve that surrounds the area made it seem more like a small town and warm community. When the Ladera Linda improvements were passed, I was thankful for the consideration of our little neighborhood. The buildings were pushed back from the property line, consideration was made to reduce the inevitable light pollution the new building would bring, and parking needs of the increased traffic were addressed. It was progress with some consideration. Moving the buildings back from the property line was especially considerate, as it protected our privacy. My property is on Helm Place, directly below the Community Center. It is my back yard. Removing the established trees that are currently on the down-ward ocean-side slope means that we lose what little privacy we have left. It will remove the natural sound barrier from the sport fields and community center. It will remove the established root systems that are holding the loose hillside intact. It will mean that everyone visiting the new community center will have direct access to my backyard, visually and physically (as a shorter fence will not stop anyone from taking a short cut across the hillside}, and the barrier that stops trash from blowing over the side will be reduced greatly. I have great concerns. Removing trees to open the view will increase foot traffic, noise, and trash. It will reduce privacy and peace. Especially the privacy-this will greatly impact property values in the area. It will remove the reason we all have paid a premium to live in this small-town, quiet neighborhood, making it seem much more commercial, resort-like, and potentially unkept. 1 5. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Sincerely, Suzanne Mackey RPV and Seaview resident 2 Subject: FW: Ladera Linda HOA Board Letter RE: City Council Nov. 15 Regular Business Item #5: Attachments: Removal of Ladera Linda Park Fence and Vegetation LLHOA Park Fence Letter.pdf From: Vlaco Family <vlaco5@cox.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 7:13 PM To: James O'Neill <joneill@rpvca.gov> Cc: Elliot Levy <elliotlevy@gmail.com>; Diane Mills <dianebmills@gmail.com>; edmundo hummel <ecarloshum@gmail.com>; martha foster <martycrna@gmail.com>; Vlaco Family <vlaco5@cox.net>; Susan Wilcox <swilcox@pvplc.org>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov>; Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>; Lincoln Lo <llo@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Ladera Linda HOA Board Letter RE: City Council Nov. 15 Regular Business Item #5: Removal of Ladera Linda Park Fence and Vegetation Hi James, I realize that LL is an active construction site and meeting before construction ceases for the day may be problematic. I also realize that most staff don't work on the weekend. However, it would certainly make it easier for more concerned residents to participate in the process if we perhaps also scheduled a weekend visit when construction is not taking place. Thanks, Jessica Sent from my iPhone On Nov 14, 2022, at 6:42 PM, James O'Neill <joneill@rpvca.gov> wrote: Mr. Levy and the Board of the Ladera Linda Neighbors/ Homeowners Association, Thank you for contacting the City about the staff report to City Council regarding the view assessment, fencing and vegetation at the Ladera Linda Community Park. In light of the concerns being expressed by community members, we are going to recommend continuing this matter to the December 6 City Council meeting to allow additional time to schedule onsite meeting with the neighborhood. Between now and the posting of that agenda (on November 29 th ), we are setting up site visits to meet with community members that have not already visited the site to engage in discussions on this subject. We have set initial site visits for Wednesday (11/16) at 3:30 p.m. and Friday (11/18) at 3:30 p.m., but can only accommodate limited amount of people at each time slot, as it is an active construction site. If you are interested in attending the site visit, please let me know by end of day tomorrow 11/15 which of the 2 time slots would work for you, so we can make sure the project site can accommodate the number 1 5. of attendees. Please be aware that the project site is undergoing active construction activities, and if the number of interested parties get too big, we may have to reschedule at later dates to accommodate. In the meantime, staff has started hosting virtual meetings (via the Zoom platform) with a few property owners in the Ladera Linda community on alternating Tuesdays at 2:30. The next meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, November 15 th • We invite you to participate in these meetings. https://us02web.zoom.us/i/82990026012?pwd=WHo1NnFQREw3RHZoSnhJRkZWZWdlZz09 Meeting ID: 829 9002 6012 Passcode: 524589 One tap mobile + 16694449171,,82990026012#,,,, *524589# us +16699006833,,82990026012#,,,, *524589# US (San Jose) Dial by your location +1 669 444 9171 us +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 719 359 4580 us +1 386 347 5053 us +1564 217 2000 us +1 646 931 3860 us +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +1309 205 3325 us +1312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 360 209 5623 us Meeting ID: 829 9002 6012 Passcode: 524589 Respectfully, 2 James O'Neill Project Manager joneill@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5247 Address: 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov Conn<'d with th.-C;ty f,om vour phonO' or labl.,1! L D Avoilobl., in th.., App Store and Google Plav ~ GITITON ~ Google Play 3 Tllis o-mJil rnossaqe contains information belonging to the City of Rancho Palos Vcrcies, which may be privilcqed, confidenlial, and/or protected from disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity narn,,d. Unauthorized clissc>mination, distribution, or copyinq is strict!y prohibited. If you receiv(!cl this crnaH in error·, or are not an intended r·ecipient:, please notify the sender irnrnecliately. Thank you for your assistancr: and cooperation. City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. Appointments are strongly encouraged, and virtual appointments are available. Many services are available online, including plan check review services. To schedule an appointment, visit the Staff Directory on the City website to find the appropriate department. Some employees may be working remotely. Please be patient with us as there may be delays or minor inconveniences in responding to your inquiry. -----Original Message----- From: Elliot Levy <elliotlevy@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 1:53 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Cc: Diane Mills <dianebmills@gmail.com>; edmundo hummel <ecarloshum@gmail.com>; martha foster <martycrna@gmail.com>; Vlaco Family <vlaco5@cox.net>; Susan Wilcox <swilcox@pvplc.org>; Elliot Levy <elliotlevy@gmail.com> Subject: Ladera Linda HOA Board Letter RE: City Council Nov. 15 Regular Business Item #5: Removal of Ladera Linda Park Fence and Vegetation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Dear all, Please see the attached letter from the Board of the Ladera Linda Neighbors/Homeowners Association regarding Item 5 on tomorrow's City Council agenda. Please confirm receipt and inclusion of the letter in the meeting materials. Thank you, Elliot Levy LLHOA Board Communications 4 TO: Rancho Palos Verdes City Council FROM: Board of the Ladera Linda Neighbors/Homeowners Association RE: City Council Nov. 15 Regular Business Item #5: Removal of Ladera Linda Park Fence and Vegetation Dear Councilmembers, The Board of the Ladera Linda Neighbors/Homeowners Association (LLHOA) was disappointed to read Staff's recommendation to remove the perimeter fence and vegetation from the lower tier of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As captured in the Staff report, we have visited the site in recent weeks and worked closely with Staff to try to minimize the impact of construction and future visitors on the surrounding neighborhoods. We strongly urge you to retain the existing fence and vegetation around the entire lower tier of the park, as it serves as an important visual and sound barrier to protect the privacy of surrounding residents. At the October 19, 2021 City Council meeting, you directed staff to maintain the existing foliage in the lower tier of the park until a view assessment from the new community center could be conducted. Staff have now concluded that the view of Catalina Island from the new building will not be obstructed, therefore the LLHOA board believes there should be no further removal of the perimeter fence and foliage. The perimeter fence and foliage around the lower tier of the park have been in place for decades and help to maintain this area as a quiet space for walking and playing without subjecting neighboring homes to added noise or curious visitors staring into their yards and windows. Staff's plan to replace the existing fence and foliage with coastal sage scrub and a new fence farther down the slope will be insufficient in preventing park visitors from staring into the yards and homes surrounding the park, or preventing noise from impacting our neighborhoods. The LLHOA Board recommends the following actions to protect the interests of residents in the surrounding neighborhoods: 1. Maintain the existing fence and foliage around the entire perimeter of the lower tier of Ladera Linda Community Park. 2. Add vining plants such as bougainvillea to the perimeter fence around the lower tier to improve the visual appearance and discourage park visitors from approaching the perimeter. 3. Add a half-height perimeter fence at the top of the slope on the ocean-facing side of the middle and upper tiers of the park as a safety precaution to prevent children, balls and trash from rolling down the slope. This is consistent with placement of City fences at the top of slopes in other nearby areas such as Forrestal Drive behind the gate and the perimeter of Founders Park. We are unaware of any complaints from park visitors about obstructed ocean views from this area of the park, considering views are available from higher tiers of the Ladera Linda Park, and other nearby areas such as Forrestal Drive and the Preserve. Furthermore, additional public parks for ocean viewing are available within a short walk across PV Drive at Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park and Vista Catalina Park, as well as other popular sunset viewing spots like Founders Park at Trump National. The LLHOA Board expects that the new park facilities and events are going to attract a significant increase in visitors to our neighborhood, along with noise, traffic and trash. We worked to have the ball courts and playgrounds moved away from the perimeter of the park and request that the Council uphold your commitment to maintain the lower tier closest to homes as a quiet corner for passive recreation. The perimeter fence and foliage serve as an important barrier to maintain privacy and property values for residents of Ladera Linda and Seaview. Also, given the destruction of trees and vegetation that has already taken place, the preservation of remaining foliage should be prioritized in this sensitive habitat adjacent to the Preserve. Thank you for considering the interests and needs of neighborhood residents in this decision. Please contact us with any questions. Sincerely, Board of the Ladera Linda Neighbors/Homeowners Association Diane Mills, President Nancy Ohara, Secretary Ed Hummel, Treasurer Marty Foster, Community Safety Jessica Vlaco, Community Outreach Susan Wilcox, Communications Elliot Levy, Communications From: Sent: To: Subject: rlauck@cox.net Monday, November 14, 2022 8:16 PM CC; CityClerk OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Sincerely, Seaview resident Robert and Donna Lauck 1 5. From: Sent: To: Subject: karen smith <kromosmith@yahoo.com> Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:28 AM CityClerk Ladera Linda Park CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Dear RPV City Council, Item 5 on tonight's City Council meeting's agenda, concerns the current fencing surrounding the park. It has been suggested the old fencing be kept and on the Forrestal side, vines be added to hide the old fencing. As a Ladera Linda neighborhood resident, I sincerely hope, if fencing is part of the plan, the decades old, bent, rusted fencing will be replaced with a more attractive barrier. Trying to cover the old fencing with additional vines, as I understand has been suggested, is not a visually attractive nor long lasting solution. Sincerely, Karen Smith Ladera Linda resident Sent from my iPhone 1 5. From: Sent: To: Subject: Gail Emery <gail@detailedmtgs.com> Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:19 PM CC; CityClerk OPPOSED to Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/Fence project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. I am writing to oppose the recommended City Council Action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, we live on Dauntless Drive at the base of the stairs to the park, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community, our neighborhood and my immediate location. I ask that the Council either reject this action outright; or delay the action on this item until there is time for sufficient input from the Seaview Community about our priorities. I am disappointed that this Agenda item was not addressed with all of the pre-planning that this project has already gone through. Please oppose this agenda item. Gail and Charles Emery 3964 Dauntless Dr Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 310.345-0548 1 Subject: FW: Opposed to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/Fence Project From: JAMES STEWART <journeyman@cox.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 11:07 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Opposed to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/Fence Project We are writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As residents of Seaview, we believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. We ask that the Council rejects this action. Sincerely, James and Elizabeth Stewart 1 5. 1 5 Subject:FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project - Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 From: Mark Morgan <facel@me.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 4:32 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; cityclerk@rpvc.gov Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project ‐ Council Meeting, 11‐15‐2022, Agenda Item #5 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Dear RPV City Council, I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a Seaview homeowner, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to the community and ask that the Council reject this action. Sincerely, Mark Morgan Seaview Homeowner 1 5 Subject:FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project - Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 From: Janet Furusho‐Zupke <msjanetz@cox.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 5:06 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Cc: rpvca@rpvca.gov Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project ‐ Council Meeting, 11‐15‐2022, Agenda Item #5 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Sincerely, Janet Furusho Zupke TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 2022 SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA _____________________________________________________________________ Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agen da material received through Monday afternoon for the Tuesday, November 15, 2022, City Council meeting: Item No. Description of Material 4 Email from Betty Riedman 5 Email exchanges between City Manager Mihranian and: Elizabeth Sax; Rayne Sherman; Kit Song Emails from: Elliot Levy; Paul and Irene Henrikson; Sandra Heffernan; Rayne Sherman; Julie Smalling; Patricia Stenehjem; Seaview Resident (Klenders Klenders); Daniel Rouimi; David Potter; Dianne Hassen; Bill Bartz; Cynthia Thornton; Steven LaPine; Jenay Rouimi; Joanne & Andy Stasio; Herb Stark; Kit Song; Edward Stevens; Jim Zupke; Joe Cruz; David Blenko; Cathy French Respectfully submitted, __________________ Teresa Takaoka L:\LATE CORRESPONDENCE\2022\2022 Coversheets\20221115 additions revisions to agenda thru Monday.docx CITY OF v~ .p<) "' ~ RANCHO PALOS VERDES Subject: FW: Nov. 15, 2022 City Council Meeting -Historical Society Presentation From: BW Riedman <rabbit943@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 3:25 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Nov. 15, 2022 City Council Meeting -Historical Society Presentation Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council Members After reading the Staff report on the proposed locations for the Historical Society's proposed museum, I must say that I disagree with the report's conclusion. PVIC is NOT a good location for the museum for several reasons. First, the area where it wants to put the building has been predesignated for outside exhibits for PVIC. Second, it's my understanding that One of the deed restrictions is that the land is zoned for passive recreational use only. If so, wouldn't that also need to be addressed? Third, the PVHS is offering to pay for the construction of the building ( for which it DOES NOT currently have the funds) and then "give" the building to the City with the understanding that the PVHS will provide the exhibits. BUT! The City would then be responsible for the maintenance, insurance and staffing of the building -all of which are not inexpensive. Plus, it wants the present PVIC docents to be trained to give tours in the new environment. Oh! Where will the exhibits that are not used going to be stored and who will pay for that? That being said, pertaining to the items that are currently stored in a trailer at the Ken Dyda Civic Center -- who is paying for the trailer? Is PVHS paying rent to have that trailer on site or is this space being provided for free? If so, that would be an interesting precedent for future non-profits wanting to store their items. 1 tf. I strongly feel that PVIC is not the correct choice for this museum. If it has to be in RPV, either the Civic Center, Hesse Park or Ladera Linda would be a better choice. Also, why aren't the other cities on The Hill being considered for this museum? Thank you for letting me voice my thoughts on this matter. Betty Riedman 3668 Cliffsite Drive, RPV 2 Subject: FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 From: Elizabeth Sax <saxhouse1@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:21 AM To: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Gtaccini@cox.net; Rayne@shermandesigngroup.net; cdoogirl@cox.net; danrouimi@yahoo.com; davidparadigm@gmail.com; jduhovic@hotmail.com; jedorsett@gmail.com; kitmsong@yahoo.com; mary.hermens@gmail.com; planningpros@earthlink.net Subject: Re: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 You write to me as a decision has been made. At the very least, nearby residents in areas effected should be given a tour and plans should be on hold until there is time to tour residents, evaluate and address resident concerns. The hiking trails I referred to were in the Portuguese Bend area leading up to Crest and Rolling Hills, very close to Seaview. Because Seaview will be getting more public visibility I can predict given the upswing in burglaries at Trump and Terranea that Seaview and Ladera Linda will be at greater risk for robberies. Ways to mitigate, prior, rather than an afterthought should be put in place now. {Fencing, signage with codes for theft, cameras, security guards, etc.) Respectfully, Elizabeth On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:20 AM Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> wrote: Good morning Elizabeth. Thank you for taking the time to express your concerns regarding tomorrow evening's agenda item on Ladera Linda. It may have not been explicitly clear in the staff report, but a new fence will be installed in the coming weeks on the southern slope near the existing drainage swales. In fact, the entire park site will be entirely fenced in. Please see the diagrams embedded in the staff report. The fence proposed to be removed is at the top of the slope, as well as the vegetation. Most of the existing vegetation on the southern slope will remain except near the top, and in that case it will be replanted. I hope this added information addresses your concerns. If not, we would be willing to meet with you and the neighbors on site to explain the proposal. Lastly, you mention existing trails have been closed in the city due to burglaries. I can't recall that occurring. Could you be more specific, such as which trails? Best, Ara 1 5. Ara Michael Mihranian City Manager 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 310-544-5202 (telephone) 310-544-5293 (fax) aram@rpvca.gov www.rpvca.gov ~ Do you really need to print this e-mail? This e-mail rnessaqo contains information belonging to tr,c City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privilc,9ed, confidential anc!/or· protoctccl from cl:sclosurc. The information is intended only for uso of the individual or· entity named. Unauthorized disserninaUon, distribution, or copying is st:ncUy prohibited. ff you received this email in eno1·, or are not an intended l'<,cipienl, please notify the sender irnrnedial:ely. Th,,nk you ror your assistance ,1nd cooperaticn. From: Elizabeth Sax <saxhouse1@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2022 9:54 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: jduhovic@hotmail.com <jduhovic@hotmail.com>; Rayne@shermandesigngroup.net <Rayne@shermandesigngroup.net>; planningpros@earthlink.net <planningpros@earthlink.net>; cdoogirl@cox.net <cdoogirl@cox.net>; jedorsett@gmail.com <jedorsett@gmail.com>; mary.hermens@gmail.com <mary.hermens@gmail.com>; davidparadigm@gmail.com <davidparadigm@gmail.com>; danrouimi@yahoo.com <danrouimi@yahoo.com>; kitmsong@yahoo.com <kitmsong@yahoo.com>; Gtaccini@cox.net <Gtaccini@cox.net> Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 Dear Rancho Palos Verdes City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose the recommended council action related to the removal of fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park above the Seaview development. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. Removal of the fencing and landscaping puts our Seaview community at greater risk of burglaries, noise, invasion of privacy, and additional potential for discarded rubbish for the residents of Seaview to contend with. The City has closed off specific Rancho Palos Verdes hiking trails due to increased burglaries and those trails have far less foot traffic than the park will have. We need and deserve to have fencing for our resident's protection and park attendees deserve to have fencing for 2 their children's and pet's protection. Shrubbery on the hillside not only mitigates noise, it helps prevent erosion. The existing plants on the perimeter are drought tolerant so there is no need to remove them at additional cost to the city. Each of the city council candidates that ran for the recent RPV election ran on safety, this is your opportunity to show us you mean it and provide Seaview safety by keeping a fence and shrubbery where it is. I ask that the council vehemently reject the idea of removing the fence and shrubbery. Sincerely, Elizabeth Sax 4022 Admirable Dr. (Seaview) HOA) Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 3 Subject: FW: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster From: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 2:02 PM To: Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>; David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>; Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>; Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>; Jerry V. Duhovic <jduhovic@hotmail.com>; Kit M. Song <kitmsong@yahoo.com>; Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>; Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>; Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>; McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>; Teresa Takaoka <TeriT@rpvca.gov>; Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>; Lincoln Lo <llo@rpvca.gov>; Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov>; James O'Neill <joneill@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster Hi Rayne, Thank you for providing us with the updated leadership roster. We will update the City's HOA master roster, as well as the contact list we have on file for this project. It looks like we contacted Joanne Stasso who doesn't appear to be on the current HOA Board -our apologies. That said, in light of the concerns being expressed by several Seaview residents, we are going to recommend continuing this matter to the December 6 City Council meeting to allow time to schedule an onsite meeting with the neighborhood. I have copied Ramzi Awwad, the Public Works Director, who will coordinate, under a separate email, a date and time for an onsite meeting within the coming week. Please be assured that our intention is to work with the neighborhood to make sure we can address the concerns (privacy, noise and security) being raised in advance of the City Council meeting. Thank you, Ara 1 Ara Michael Mihranian City Manager aram@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5202 Address: , r,,,_,._, .,.,.; .,..,,, 11'• • AppStore t)-~lePlay 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes. CA 902 75 Website: www.rpvca.1;ov C,:t) l+:tn 1S jJf.)fti tc,-rht1 public dur{qg requf:·1r bus,fr::..'lss liou,r:; .4.ppointtr:i::r,ts CJfi} strongly ,r:t-;,:ouragt:d, a,:ci v1rtua: opp:J,i/1tnh't1 ts or1:: a va/\;J Ot:,:_ 1'i1'(Jny Si'.rv1·ce;; ote .;:n/cnl::; .04:i! onht1 ~" 11KiUdmg ptarf che,k revlev;- T :J sc ht:ciule Cui o,cpo i1h1trner1 t. vi'.si·t th~ Srl..'.tff 0!(1:_ .. ,: rc,ry ,_.,,1 rh~ C,ty V/t:bsirt: to f,nd tht: approp,,art: From: Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06 AM To: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>; David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>; Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>; Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>; Jerry V. Duhovic <jduhovic@hotmail.com>; Kit M. Song <kitmsong@yahoo.com>; Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>; Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>; Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>; Rayne Sherman FIIDA <Rayne@ShermanDesignGroup.net> Subject: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster Importance: High Hi Ara and the RPV City Council, below is the current SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster for your reference and use: Board of Directors: Executive Committee: President: Vice President: Treasurer: Secretary: Board Members: Jeff Dorsett Mary Hermens David Potter Dan Rouimi Kit Song Jerry Duhovic 310-502-8036 Rayne Sherman 562-714-3113 Lori Givens 213-280-4249 Pam Sherman 310-569-2940 jedorsett@gmail.com Mary:.Hermens@gmail.com David1:2ardigm@gmail.com danrouimi@y:ahoo.com kitsong@y:ahoo.com jduhovic@hotmail.com ray:ne@ShermanDesignGrou1:2.net cdoogirl@cox.net 1:2lanning1:2ros@earthlink.net 2 Unofficial Alternate Member Gerry Taccini Rayne Sherman Vice President gtaccini@cox.net SeaView Residents Association 4043 Admirable Dr Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 562/714-3113 Rayne@ShermanDesignGroup.net 3 Subject: FW: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster From: KIT & KWI <kitmsong@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 2:44 PM To: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>; David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>; Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>; Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>; Jerry V. Duhovic <jduhovic@hotmail.com>; Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>; Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>; Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>; McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>; Teresa Takaoka <TeriT@rpvca.gov>; Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>; Lincoln Lo <llo@rpvca.gov>; Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov>; James O'Neill <joneill@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster Ara, we are appreciative of pushing this agenda to a future meeting. Several of us had planned to attend the meeting tomorrow evening or participate by Zoom. If there will not be a discussion, we could avoid prolonging the city's meeting tomorrow with requests to speak with your assurance that this will be postponed pending the on-site visit you mention below. Please advise if we should still plan on attending tomorrow in person or via zoom. Best Kit From: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 2:01 PM To: Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net>, CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>, David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>, Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>, Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>, "Jerry V. Duhovic" <jduhovic@hotmail.com>, Kit Song <kitmsong@yahoo.com>, Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>, Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>, Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>, McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>, Teresa Takaoka <TeriT@rpvca.gov>, Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>, Lincoln Lo <llo@rpvca.gov>, Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov>, James O'Neill <joneill@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster Hi Rayne, Thank you for providing us with the updated leadership roster. We will update the City's HOA master roster, as well as the contact list we have on file for this project. It looks like we contacted Joanne Stasso who doesn't appear to be on the current HOA Board -our apologies. 1 That said, in light of the concerns being expressed by several Seaview residents, we are going to recommend continuing this matter to the December 6 City Council meeting to allow time to schedule an onsite meeting with the neighborhood. I have copied Ramzi Awwad, the Public Works Director, who will coordinate, under a separate email, a date and time for an onsite meeting within the coming week. Please be assured that our intention is to work with the neighborhood to make sure we can address the concerns (privacy, noise and security) being raised in advance of the City Council meeting. Thank you, Ara C, ·~~~ .. , \ ·····' ~I,;, ,'> <./.,) ,o, Ara Michael Mihranian City Manager aram@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5202 Address: 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: wwW.f.P...Y.f.a,gov ► ~lePlay C)tv t-k:t opr:n tt..f &1e public. dLtrir1g regut;:11 busu!c5.5 hours Appo,intrr:f:f';tS c:rr;.• srrOl1Qiy f:,1,cH1rugec( and v1tru:.:d o;:,,po1:,;trneri ts CJtt: ava/iabfi;:, 1'..-i'(tny st:rv/ce:; are avadflbi,;: :..rrih11e_, ,ra.:/uct/1ig pt1n cra .. "-c:: re1v,ev/ .s ~tv '(~~ To 5ch2dui'e 011 appa•nunen t, v15Jr t'1,0 Sraff 0 1''t'Ctory c,n the City v,,ebsit~ to fir;ci rht: apprcp,,1ar:2 Cf!:?fY:'JtrnJ:..''i t Sur?':·,? 2,.np.Iov2;,:s rnuv f;1;.'). V/Otking rerth..Jt';."l-fy. P,t::as;;: b'i: pot! t'l,n t V/td1 us as th2re roay bi.? deloy:; ::r 1r:t:onv.en1en::2s 1r1 rt.$,OCndi'ng to vour u1qurty From: Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06 AM To: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>; David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>; Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>; Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>; Jerry V. Duhovic <jduhovic@hotmail.com>; Kit M. Song <kitmsong@yahoo.com>; Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>; Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>; Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>; Rayne Sherman FIIDA <Rayne@ShermanDesignGroup.net> Subject: SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster Importance: High Hi Ara and the RPV City Council, below is the current SeaView Residents Association (SRA) Leadership Roster for your reference and use: Board of Directors: 2 Executive Committee: President: Vice President: Treasurer: Jerry Duhovic Rayne Sherman Lori Givens 310-502-8036 jduhovic@hotmail.com 562-714-3113 rayne@ShermanDesignGroup.net 213-280-4249 cdoogirl@cox.net Secretary: Pam Sherman 310-569-2940 planningpros@earthlink.net Board Members: Jeff Dorsett jedorsett@gmail.com Mary Hermens Mary.Hermens@gmail.com David Potter Davidpardigm@gmail.com Dan Rouimi danrouimi@yahoo.com Kit Song kitsong@yahoo.com Unofficial Alternate Member Gerry Taccini Rayne Sherman Vice President gtaccini@cox.net SeaView Residents Association 4043 Admirable Dr Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 562/714-3113 Rayne@ShermanDesignGroup.net 3 Subject: Attachments: FW: Ladera Linda HOA Board Letter RE: City Council Nov. 15 Regular Business Item #5: Removal of Ladera Linda Park Fence and Vegetation LLHOA Park Fence Letter.pdf From: Elliot Levy <elliotlevy@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 1:53 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Cc: Diane Mills <dianebmills@gmail.com>; edmundo hummel <ecarloshum@gmail.com>; martha foster <martycrna@gmail.com>; Vlaco Family <v1aco5@cox.net>; Susan Wilcox <swilcox@pvplc.org>; Elliot Levy <elliotlevy@gmail.com> Subject: Ladera Linda HOA Board Letter RE: City Council Nov. 15 Regular Business Item #5: Removal of Ladera Linda Park Fence and Vegetation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Dear all, Please see the attached letter from the Board of the Lad era Linda Neighbors/Homeowners Association regarding Item 5 on tomorrow's City Council agenda. Please confirm receipt and inclusion of the letter in the meeting materials. Thank you, Elliot Levy LLHOA Board Communications 1 TO: Rancho Palos Verdes City Council FROM: Board of the Ladera Linda Neighbors/Homeowners Association RE: City Council Nov. 15 Regular Business Item #5: Removal of Ladera Linda Park Fence and Vegetation Dear Councilmembers, The Board of the Ladera Linda Neighbors/Homeowners Association (LLHOA) was disappointed to read Staff's recommendation to remove the perimeter fence and vegetation from the lower tier of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As captured in the Staff report, we have visited the site in recent weeks and worked closely with Staff to try to minimize the impact of construction and future visitors on the surrounding neighborhoods. We strongly urge you to retain the existing fence and vegetation around the entire lower tier of the park, as it serves as an important visual and sound barrier to protect the privacy of surrounding residents. At the October 19, 2021 City Council meeting, you directed staff to maintain the existing foliage in the lower tier of the park until a view assessment from the new community center could be conducted. Staff have now concluded that the view of Catalina Island from the new building will not be obstructed, therefore the LLHOA board believes there should be no further removal of the perimeter fence and foliage. The perimeter fence and foliage around the lower tier of the park have been in place for decades and help to maintain this area as a quiet space for walking and playing without subjecting neighboring homes to added noise or curious visitors staring into their yards and windows. Staff's plan to replace the existing fence and foliage with coastal sage scrub and a new fence farther down the slope will be insufficient in preventing park visitors from staring into the yards and homes surrounding the park, or preventing noise from impacting our neighborhoods. The LLHOA Board recommends the following actions to protect the interests of residents in the surrounding neighborhoods: 1. Maintain the existing fence and foliage around the entire perimeter of the lower tier of Ladera Linda Community Park. 2. Add vining plants such as bougainvillea to the perimeter fence around the lower tier to improve the visual appearance and discourage park visitors from approaching the perimeter. 3. Add a half-height perimeter fence at the top of the slope on the ocean-facing side of the middle and upper tiers of the park as a safety precaution to prevent children, balls and trash from rolling down the slope. This is consistent with placement of City fences at the top of slopes in other nearby areas such as Forrestal Drive behind the gate and the perimeter of Founders Park. We are unaware of any complaints from park visitors about obstructed ocean views from this area of the park, considering views are available from higher tiers of the Ladera Linda Park, and other nearby areas such as Forrestal Drive and the Preserve. Furthermore, additional public parks for ocean viewing are available within a short walk across PV Drive at Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park and Vista Catalina Park, as well as other popular sunset viewing spots like Founders Park at Trump National. The LLHOA Board expects that the new park facilities and events are going to attract a significant increase in visitors to our neighborhood, along with noise, traffic and trash. We worked to have the ball courts and playgrounds moved away from the perimeter of the park and request that the Council uphold your commitment to maintain the lower tier closest to homes as a quiet corner for passive recreation. The perimeter fence and foliage serve as an important barrier to maintain privacy and property values for residents of Ladera Linda and Seaview. Also, given the destruction of trees and vegetation that has already taken place, the preservation of remaining foliage should be prioritized in this sensitive habitat adjacent to the Preserve. Thank you for considering the interests and needs of neighborhood residents in this decision. Please contact us with any questions. Sincerely, Board of the Ladera Linda Neighbors/Homeowners Association Diane Mills, President Nancy Ohara, Secretary Ed Hummel, Treasurer Marty Foster, Community Safety Jessica Vlaco, Community Outreach Susan Wilcox, Communications Elliot Levy, Communications Subject: FW: City Council Nov. 15 Regular Business Item #5: Removal of Ladera Linda Park Fence and Vegetation From: Elliot Levy <elliotlevy@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 8:35 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Subject: City Council Nov. 15 Regular Business Item #5: Removal of Ladera Linda Park Fence and Vegetation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Dear Councilmembers, Following the recent onslaught of construction permit violations at the Ladera Linda Park, I was disappointed to see Staff make recommendations to further diminish residents' quality of life in Ladera Linda and Seaview with the removal of the perimeter fence and foliage. As Staff have noted in their report and I understand you have all observed, the lower tier fence does not obstruct views from the new building or higher tiers of the park. Therefore, the fence and foliage should be kept in place around the lower tier to continue providing a visual and sound barrier for nearby homes and discourage park visitors from approaching the perimeter slope. Staff's suggestion to replace the fence with coastal sage scrub will not provide a sufficient barrier, and is unnecessary considering wide ocean views are readily available in other areas of the new park, along Forrestal Drive and the parks directly across PV Drive South. Maintaining the fence would also be consistent with approved site plans to limit noisy activities to the areas of the park farthest from homes. We want to keep the lower tier as a quiet place for passive recreation and avoid attracting even more visitors to picnic and party in this area. With the proliferation of portable speakers and barbeques, we have seen the impact of creating large open spaces with ocean views in our city and know Rec & Park staff as well as LASO have limited resources to enforce disturbance laws. Vining plants like bougainvillea can be added to the existing fence to improve its appearance and discourage visitors from approaching the park perimeter. The destruction of large trees and foliage at the site has already been detrimental to the area, and I would like to avoid any further unnecessary removal of plants along the perimeter in this sensitive habitat near the Preserve. Please keep the fence and foliage and avoid subjecting Ladera Linda and Seaview residents to any further negative impacts from this park. We are counting on you to protect our safety, peace and quiet, and property values. Thank you, Elliot Levy 1 5 Subject: FW: LL From: Irene Henrikson <irene.henrikson@cox.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:23 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: LL CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Please keep a fence and foliage to protect the privacy of home owners in Ladera Linda and Seaview. Paul and Irene Henrikson 32404 Searaven 1 5 Subject: From: Sandra <san551@cox.net> FW: Opposed to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/Park Fence Project 11 /15/22 Agenda Item 5 Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:40 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Opposed to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/Park Fence Project 11/15/22 Agenda Item 5 We are strongly opposed to changing the location of the fence surrounding the Ladera Linda property. We have lived on Valor Place, a cul de sac immediately below the park for 24 years. There have been incidents of unsupervised "kids" throwing rocks at residences below the center, both into pools and yards as well as one time striking a young child on the face. Unsupervised children are often on the hillsides while their parents are involved in soccer and not restricting their activities. Other times people have sat on the swales drinking alcohol (leaving litter). Since the area is secluded, access from the center into our properties is easily done without being seen and has resulted in burglaries. Every property on our street has installed security due to seclusion and ease of access from the park above. I raised my concerns at one of the community meetings because no fencing was shown on the plans. We need both the current fencing where located to deter intrusion as well as large native vegetation to buffer the views into our backyards and pools. The fencing will also ensure the safety of guests to the park so that they remain in the park on trails and designated play areas. We bought here because it is quiet and remote. We don't want to have forced interaction with users of the updated facility looking down at our family and friends enjoying our yard/pool while they are at Ladera Linda. Without the existing large barriers, people have will no limits to bad behavior. Thank you Sandra Heffernan Cell 310 308 1633 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 1 5 Subject: FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 From: Rayne Sherman <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:01 AM To: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com>; David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com>; Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>; Jeff Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>; Jerry V. Duhovic <jduhovic@hotmail.com>; Kit M. Song <kitmsong@yahoo.com>; Lori Givens <cdoogirl@cox.net>; Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>; Pam Sherman <Planningpros@earthlink.net>; Rayne Sherman FIIDA <Rayne@ShermanDesignGroup.net> Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 To RPV City Council and Staff, I am opposed to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project Proposal for the following reasons: • RPV Staff has not involved/ coordinated the staff approved proposal with the SeaView Residents Association {SRA) or the greater neighborhood. • Until the following SRA priorities are discussed with the effected community, I oppose the proposal in in its present form. 1. Security of the SRA neighborhood. 2. Privacy of the SRA neighborhood. 3. Noise into the SRA neighborhood. 4. Views -not downhill, but straight-out. There is no urgency in the passage of this proposal on the 15 th , the construction of the new community center is months from completion, I urge you delay the approval of this proposal and start to coordinate with the SRA. Rayne Sfierman, 4043 Admirable Dr. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 (C) 562/714-3113 (H ) 310/544-7767 (0 ) 562/424-2227 Following Rayne@ShermanDesignGroup.netthe 1 5 • Subject: FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 From: fjsmalling@aol.com <fjsmalling@aol.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:58 AM To: cc@rvpca.gov; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Sincerely, Seaview resident Julie Smalling 4232 Exultant Dr., RPV fjsmalling@aol.com 1 5. Subject: FW: Removal of the existing fence and vegetation on the ocean-facing side of Ladera Linda Community Park From: Patricia Stenehjem <patsyanntoo@icloud.com> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2022 3:48 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Removal of the existing fence and vegetation on the ocean-facing side of Ladera Linda Community Park CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Dear Mayor and City Council members, please consider installing at least a 4 foot wall or fence (preferably planted similar to the Forrestal side) at the top of the slope on the ocean-facing side of the Community Center for safety reasons, and for privacy for the downslope residents in Seaview. I seem to remember there were issues years ago at the AYSO field with children running down the slope there. Also, having a fence might encourage some of the "sunset seekers" who are likely to flock to the park, to view the sunset from the more westerly area near the Community Center building, thus providing more privacy to those of us whose homes are directly east of the park. Respectfully, Patricia Stenehjem 1 s. Subject: FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 From: klenders klenders <klenders@cox.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:49 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 Good Morning, I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Seaview resident 1 5. Subject: FW: Consideration and possible action to determine the limits of removal of the existing fence and vegetation on the ocean-facing side of the lower tier of Ladera Linda Community Park. From: Dan Rouimi <danrouimi@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2022 10:42 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Consideration and possible action to determine the limits of removal of the existing fence and vegetation on the ocean-facing side of the lower tier of Ladera Linda Community Park. Dear City council, In response to the possible approval of the plan below I would like to submit my feedback as a resident and HOA board member of Seaview. AGENDA TITLE: Consideration and possible action to determine the limits of removal of the existing fence and vegetation on the ocean-facing side of the lower tier of Ladera Linda Community Park. I am NOT in favor of doing anything to the existing fence and vegetation in place in the lower tier of Ladera Linda Community Park. I have the following questions: 1. What type of environmental survey will be done to ensure there is no impact on the flora and fauna that inhabit that area. There are endangered species of gnatcatchers in the area. 2. What type of geological survey will be done to limit further erosion on the hill. 3. Why remove existing vegetation that is drought proof and requires no irrigation. 4. How will this removal impact the privacy of residents in Sea View. 5. What are the impacts of park construction on the houses directly below the construction site. ( I have already spoken to one community member who says they have experienced structural cracks in the foundation of their home. We will inquire further to other residents who may have sustained similar damage. 6. Why does the staff still recommend removing the fence when residents from Ladera Linda are also again lowering this fence. 7. The removal of this fence will decrease the privacy, increase noise and reduce the quality of life for residents in sea view and Ladera Linda communities. How can we avoid this. 8. How will this fence removal affect property values in Seaview. Sincerely, Daniel Rouimi 3926 Dauntless Dr RPV 818-263-3115 1 5. Subject: FW: Item #5 on Tuesday's Agenada -Ladera Linda Fence From: David Potter <davidparadigm@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2022 5:28 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Item #5 on Tuesday's Agenada -Ladera Linda Fence Hi- I am opposed to the City Council making any decision on the Ladera Linda fence today. I think more research needs to be completed and the decision needs to be postponed until the City has received input from neighbors in the area. David Potter 1 5 . Subject: FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 From: Dianne Hassen <dihassen@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 7:16 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Sincerely, Seaview Resident 4230 Stalwart Drive 1 5, Subject: FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 From: Bill Bartz <billbartz@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:08 AM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Sincerely, Seaview resident 1 s Subject: FW: Ladera linda From: CYNTHIA THORNTON <emmashoes@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2022 8:20 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Subject: Ladera linda Subject Line: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Sincerely, Seaview resident Cynthia Thornton Tel 310.717.0716 1 5. Subject: FW: Ladera Linda Park Fence and Foliage Removal on Nov 15 City Council Agenda From: Steven Lapine <stevenlapine@auditamerica.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 11:11 AM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; pt17stearman@gmail.com Subject: Ladera Linda Park Fence and Foliage Removal on Nov 15 City Council Agenda I object to city staff's recommendation to remove the privacy foliage and existing fence around the Ladera Community Center and I ask the City Council to reject the proposal. This is completely unfair to the surrounding neighbors that are already burdened by the changes turning Ladra Linda from a neighborhood park to a tourist destination. It's my understanding the city will be renting out the facility for parties and weddings which 1100% reject. These changes to the park make privacy even more important. I can't understand why the City is not supporting the neighbors in our community. The City should not be in the events business. Staff continues to convert a neighborhood park into a tourist destination and they should be checked by the elected City Council representing our community. I know how this will effect Sea View because the City allowed my neighbor to install a large observation window, set just 6 feet from the property line. This new window looks right down on my back yard and has eliminated our privacy. The City needs to get dialed back into making the City a better place for the residents. I urge Council to reject the request to remove the foliage and the fencing. Best Regards, Steven LaPine 310-938-0875 1 5 Subject: FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 From: Jenay Michou <jenaymichou@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 1:01 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 I am writing to vehemently oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. In the public statement, the city stated our HOA was informed of the site visit and opportunity for discussion. This is not true. Board president and previous RPV mayor Jerry Duhovic did not receive an email with this information, nor did any other SRA board member. We have great concerns about the current erosion of the hillside, the trash and debris that will accumulate at the inaccessible fence line, the noise level that will no longer be dampened by the current shrubbery, and the site lines that will now be directly into our homes. The original scope directed the project to create a view line from the community center. This has been achieved, per the public statement. There is no reason the expand the project and create additional view sites when many such sites currently exist nearby including Founder's Park and the Marilyn Ryan Park. This opinion has also been shared by the Ladera Linda residents who were able to visit the site. They recommended the fence and shrubbery remain as is, with the addition of some vining plants to cover what it appears the project believes to be unsightly fencing. Jenay Rouimi Dauntless Drive, Rancho Palos Verdes Sent from my iPhone 1 5 Subject: FW: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/Fence Project From: Joanne Stasio <jstasio@cox.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 2:15 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/Fence Project RPV City Council, We are writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Sincerely, Joanne & Andy Stasio Seaview Residents I Exultant Drive 1 From: Sent: To: Subject: Herb Stark <pt17stearman@gmail.com> Monday, November 14, 2022 1 :42 PM CC; CityClerk City Council Meeting November 15th Regular Business Item 5 City Council Meeting November 15th Regular Business Item 5 Removal of the existing fence and vegetation at Ladera Linda Park I am speaking against removing the existing fence and vegetation along the ocean side of Ladera Linda Park. Staff is not being honest as they did not directly contact the affected residents of both Ladera Linda and Seaview but relied on the individuals of the associations. As a result they received very little response which I am assure was their intent to mislead the council to believe that the residents did not care or saw no impact. This item should be removed from the agenda until proper resident responses are considered. Staff also distorts city goals when they state that the City's goal to preserve views and vistas for the public but not considering the detrimental effects that it will have on the surrounding residents. It seems that staff give a higher priority to visitors that the surrounding residents. 1. The removal of this fence will decrease privacy, increase noise and reduce the quality of life for residents in Seaview and Ladera Linda communities. 2. This is one step closer to turning Ladera Linda from a neighborhood park into a tourist destination and attraction. 3. A tourist destination and rental facility will result in an increase in traffic on Forrestal Drive and a safety issue at the intersection of PVDS and Forrestal Drive. I recommend a rejection of Staff's proposal. Herb Stark Rancho Palos Verdes 1 5. Subject: FW: Action Item 5 for upcoming City Council Meeting From: KIT & KWI <kitmsong@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 1:22 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Subject: Action Item 5 for upcoming City Council Meeting I am writing in opposition to the proposed staff recommended action for the existing fence and it's replacement as a part of the Ladera Linda project. I ask for the council to either reject the proposal or delay action until meeting with Seaview Residents Association can be held for community input. While there is mention of SRA having been contacted, none of the present board members or residents of the community have been contacted. The community has strong views on this and would like to meet with city officials on site to review the plan and to seek an alternate solution to the proposed plan. Sincerely Kit Song Board member of SRA. 1 5. Subject: FW: I am Opposed to the City Council's recommendation on the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence project. From: ezstevens <ezstevens@cox.net> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 1:01 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: I am Opposed to the City Council's recommendation on the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence project. Subject Line: I am OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project - Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 Dear City Council, I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview for 40 plus years, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview & Ladera Linda Community about our community priorities. 1. What type of geological survey will be done to limit further erosion on the hill?? 2. Why remove existing vegetation that is drought proof and requires no irrigation?. 3. How will this removal impact the privacy of residents in Sea View? 4. What are the impacts of park construction on the houses directly below the construction site. ( I have already spoken to one community member who says they have experienced structural cracks in the foundation of their home. We will inquire further to other residents who may have sustained similar damage?? 5. Why does the staff still recommend removing the fence when residents from Ladera Linda are also against lowering this fence? 6. The removal of this fence will decrease the privacy, increase noise and reduce the quality of life for residents in sea view and Ladera Linda communities. How can we avoid this? 7. How will this fence removal affect property values in Seaview? 8. What type of environmental survey will be done to ensure there is no impact on the flora and fauna that inhabit that area. There are endangered species of gnatcatchers in the area? Sincerely, Seaview resident Edward Stevens Conqueror Dr. 1 5. From: Sent: To: Subject: James Zupke Insurance <jrzupkeins@sbcglobal.net> Monday, November 14, 2022 2:50 PM CityClerk Ladara Linda fencing. I just became aware of the proposed construction fence relocation proposal. You seem to have complete disregards for our Seaview home residences. Doing so would degrade our neighborhood like it is under construction. This would degrade the tracts appearance and effect values. This may also include closing the access to the stairs (125) leading up to LIL, which are used daily by alot of Seaview residences for exercising. The city of RPV has a long history of disrespect for our fine neighborhood. This to include the removal of a entrance flag pole ( for construction) and never replacing it, allowing developers work that has increased traffic and crime and ignored our need for more security. Keep up the good work. Regards, Jim Zupke 4315 Exultant Drive, RPV, Ca. 90275 1 5. From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear RPV City Council, Joe C. <jocruz1@hotmail.com> Monday, November 14, 2022 4:20 PM cc@rvpca.gov; CityClerk OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community on the matter. In particular, I am concerned that staff have not taken into account the effects of removing the foliage on Seaview. For instance, the park sits in a natural sound bowl due to the topography and surrounding mountains. As a result, noise originating at the park carries and is amplified across our neighborhood. Has the city done a study of how sound travels from that location and the effects their proposed action will have on Seaview residents? Removing the foliage that is present and replacing it with natural grasses and brush as proposed would remove a sound deadening barrier currently in place for our neighborhood, and will ultimately affect our ability to enjoy our homes and neighborhood. Also, while a park has been at the Ladera Linda location for years, our neighborhood has enjoyed the natural look and quaint neighborhood feel the current foliage provides. Removing the foliage and lowering the fence line would emphasize the park site when driving into our neighborhood, making the park a focal point. That's not something we want and, quite frankly not something set forth in the city's proposals for the park. The current folliage along the Ladera Linda Park boundary is already less than we had a couple of years ago. Please don't remove any more. Sincerely, Joe Cruz Seaview Resident Dauntless Drive 1 5. From: Sent: To: David Blenko <dblenko@gmail.com> Monday, November 14, 2022 4:19 PM CityClerk Subject: Fwd: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 To whom it may concern: Please forward this to Council members. An earlier version of this email addressed to cc@rvpca.gov was returned as undeliverable. Thank you, David Blenko ----------Forwarded message--------- From: David Blenko <dblenko@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 3:59 PM Subject: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 To: <cc@rvpca.gov> Cc: Jerry Duhovic <jduhovic@hotmail.com>, <rayne@shermandesigngroup.net>, Pam and Rayne Sherman <planningpros@earthlink.net>, <cdoogirl@cox.net>, Jeffrey Dorsett <jedorsett@gmail.com>, Marc and Mary Hermens <mary.hermens@gmail.com>, <davidparadigm@gmail.com>, <danrouimi@yahoo.com>, <kitmsong@yahoo.com>, Gerry Taccini <Gtaccini@cox.net>, Kathy Blenko <kmblenko@gmail.com>, Terry Digby <terrydigby0@gmail.com>, Carol Midford <officemidford2@aol.com>, <dvusd@frontier.com>, <sfkleinjan@gmail.com>, Suzanne Mackey <suemackey2@yahoo.com> Dear Council Members, Let me start by saying that I support an investment by the City in upgrading Ladera Linda, which has been an underutilized RPV asset. However, for reasons below, I am writing to oppose the upcoming recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I am concerned that this would be detrimental to our property. My concern is that the fencing and vegetation changes as proposed will leave adjacent neighbors -including my wife and me -with no meaningful barrier or buffer to insulate us from the increased traffic and activity that the improvements currently under construction will generate. It's natural to ask whether the original design and environmental impact work envisioned the latest proposed changes - and, if so, whether they adequately addressed them. Let me be more specific as to my concerns relating to our property. Our home is on Helm Place, immediately below Ladera Linda. The proposed changes -designed as they are to enhance the view from the Ladera Linda site -seem likely to have the effect of allowing people who would be screened by the existing fence and plants to peer into our backyards. This would be creepy and dramatically impair our privacy. Many of us in our neighborhood were attracted by the peace, quiet and privacy our area affords. We are concerned that there has not been adequate consideration of the impact of these proposed changes on our property. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community concerns. Why not allow further time to consider input from the neighbors who are directly affected? 1 S. Sincerely, Seaview resident David David Blenko Rancho Palos Verdes, CA USA 2 From: Sent: To: Cathy French <ccf214@cox.net> Monday, November 14, 2022 4:19 PM CC; CityClerk Subject: Fwd: IMPORTANT DECISIONS REGARDING LADERA LINDA CONSTRUCTION Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Cathy French <ccf214@cox.net> Date: November 14, 2022 at 4:07:53 PM PST To: Cathy French <ccf214@cox.net> Subject: Fwd: IMPORTANT DECISIONS REGARDING LADERA LINDA CONSTRUCTION Cathy French Subject Line: OPPOSED to the Ladera Linda Community Park Landscape/ Fence Project -Council Meeting, 11-15-2022, Agenda Item #5 I am writing to oppose the recommended council action related to the fencing and vegetation along the border of the Ladera Linda Community Park. As a resident of Seaview, I believe that the recommended action is detrimental to our community. I ask that the Council either reject this action or delay action on this item until there is input from the Seaview Community about our community priorities. Sincerely, 4235 Palos Verdes Dr So Rancho Palos Verdes, Ca 1 5 •