The URL can be used to link to this page

20230221 Late Correspondence1 Subject:FW: GREEN HILLS PROPOSED CREMATORIUM MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2023 7PM From: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 6:45 PM To: Zeny Bunag <zenybunag@yahoo.com> Cc: CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov>; Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: GREEN HILLS PROPOSED CREMATORIUM MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2023 7PM Hello- Please note that it may be too late to get this correspondence to the City Council, since the meeting is about to begin. However, you may wish to fill out the form below, so you can possibly comment during the public hearing portion of the meeting. Thank you. https://www.rpvca.gov/FormCenter/City‐Service‐Requests‐3/Public‐Participation‐and‐Comment‐Request‐87 Amy Seeraty Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov Phone ‐ (310) 544‐5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov This e-mail message contains information belonging to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privileged, confidential and/or protected from disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, or are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. From: Zeny Bunag <zenybunag@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 6:43 PM To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Subject: GREEN HILLS PROPOSED CREMATORIUM MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2023 7PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe!!!. Hi Amy, Please can you ask Green Hill representatives the following: 1. Where is the residue being disposed ? 2. Is there any possibility that the dust from the crematorium that can be a part of the pollution in the air and will affect the 1 2 residents health condition residing close by like in our Street of Avenida Feliciano, Tarrasa and other streets being affected ? We are very concern about the health of the individual residents. 3. If this plan will push true, is the air filtration excellent not to smell the burning bodies what we are experiencing in our neighborhood ? 4. The crematorium must not be build very close to the neighborhood of AVENIDA FELICIANO. The vacant lots all the way to the back of Green Hills property and away from the neighborhood of AVENIDA FELICIANO which is the right site to have it build. As a citizen paying property tax in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes I am very concern of this issue. I am hoping that we can resolve this issue of building new Crematorium . Thank you in advance and please keep me posted. Thanks! Best regards, Zeny Bunag Realtor Keller Williams Realty South Bay 23670 Hawthorne Blvd.,Suite 100 Torrance, CA 90505 Direct: 310-755-2536 Cell: 310-930-6455 Fax : 310-755-2585 DRE: 01082663 Email: zenybunag@yahoo.com TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2023 SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA _____________________________________________________________________ Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material presented for tonight’s meeting. Item No. Description of Material 1 Emails from: Nick Resich; Barbara Sattler 2 Email exchanges between Senior Administrative Analyst Waters and Dana Graham Emails from: Eva Cicoria; Susan Deo; Jim Knight; Vanessa Dean; David Eaton 3 Email exchange between Senior Administrative Analyst Villalpando and Jim MacLellan and Gwen Butterfield ** PLEASE NOTE: Materials attached after the color page(s) were submitted through Monday, February 20, 2023**. Respectfully submitted, _______________ Teresa Takaoka L:\LATE CORRESPONDENCE\2023\2023 Coversheets\20230221 additions revisions to agenda.docx From: Sent: To: Cc: Amy Seeraty Tuesday, February 21, 2023 3:00 PM CityClerk Subject: Ara Mihranian; Octavio Silva FW:GH Late correspondence for this evening, thank you. Amy Seeraty Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov DOWNLOAD 'ltl:r iiw; e·mail message contains information belo119in9 to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be p1·ivile9ed, confidential and/or protected from discl,y;ur'f,. The inforrnation is intenck,cl only for use of the individual or entity rk1rlK:d. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, o,· copyin9 is strictly pmhibited. If you r,;ceivec: this ernail in (:ri'Or, or are not an !ntenc!ed recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and coopetalion. From: Nick Resich <NResich@greenhillsla.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 1:58 PM To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Subject: GH Amy I just wanted to follow up and give you a little more information on what federal and state agencies we fall under for regulating our retort (crematory). First, we are governed by the DCA (Department of Consumer Affairs). This regulatory entity ensures we are compliant with state regulations regarding use and record keeping. The DCA does annual inspections of our crematory facility to ensure we are up to state standards with items such as record keeping, cleanliness, licensing, and that our processes meet best practice standards. We fall under OSHA requirements for safety and operational use. We have annual inspections by the Fire Department. During these inspections our facilities are meticulously walked to ensure we are up to the most current fire safety requirements. Green Hills is also under the jurisdiction of the AQMD (Air Quality Management District) This agency is responsible for addressing emissions from stationary sources through permits and local rules. The AQMD inspects our crematory annually to ensure we are operating under their requirements and our issued permit. These licenses and permits are required to be updated annually and are sent in as part of our CUP requirement. Thanks, 1 I 7~ GR.EEN HILLS Nick Resich Director of Buildings and Park Maintenance Direct: (310) 521-4301 Main: (310) 831-0311 27501 South Western Avenue Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.greenhillsla.com 2 Subject: FW: Comments re Green Hills crematorium Attachments: Comments re Green Hills crematorium.pdf; FINAL_Field Inquiry-Crematoria emissions and air quality impacts_EN_0.pdf From: bsattler <bsattler@igc.org> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 6:27 PM To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Cc: Al <alsattler@igc.org> Subject: Comments re Green Hills crematorium Dear Ms. Seeraty, Attached is our comment letter on this item as well as a reference document to be included as an attachment to our letter. Barbara Sattler 1 I February 20, 2023 re: Green Hills proposal for new crematorium Dear Ms. Seeraty, Thank you for the opportunity to address the Green Hills proposal for a new crematorium facility. We disagree with Staff's statement that "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment." While the replacement of the older facility with a new one may not introduce any significant changes to environmental impacts, it cannot be stated unequivocably that the operation of any crematorium does not have environmental impacts. In fact, there is a growing awareness that crematoria in general can be expected to emit certain toxic chemicals and pollutants to the surrounding environment and that some of these emissions may have long term detrimental health impacts to neighboring populations. We found the attached document, FIELD INQUIRY: CREMATORIA EMISSIONS AND AIR QUALITY IMPACTS, from National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (in Canada) to be especially helpful in thinking about this issue. https://ncceh.ca/documents/field-inquiry/crematoria-emissions- and-air-guality-impacts According to that document, "Crematoria contribute approximately 5% of total PCDD/Fs, 6% of total Hg emissions and 0.25% of PM2.s emissions in Canada."(p. 2) Air Quality Regulations Up until this point in time the City has apparently relied solely on the regulations set forth by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to govern air pollution from the existing Green Hills crematorium. According to the Staff Report, those regulations only address limiting the volume of use of natural gas. We could not find any specific regulations for crematoria on the SCAQMD website, and in fact all we found was a notification that all such regulations had been suspended at the peak of the COVID pandemic. We found no indications that any regulations had since been reinstated. This lack of air quality regulation is troubling. We request that the City appeal to the SCAQMD for the resumption, and perhaps also expansion of regulations on crematoria. Likewise, we believe that it would be beneficial for the City to also contact the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health about this issue. This is something that should ultimately be addressed county-wide, if not state-wide. Rancho Palos Verdes is not the only location with residential areas located near crematoria. Rather than passively wait for other governmental entities to set new comprehensive regulations, the City should set protective regulations within the City boundaries. We believe that there is no better time for the City to take a pro-active approach in setting regulations for the Green Hills crematorium than now, when a new facility is being proposed. We request that the City establish additional Conditions of Approval for the new crematorium that require its construction and operations to minimize the release of toxic substances and airborne pollutants to the surrounding environment. Airborne Mercury (Hg) Airborne mercury is perhaps the pollutant of greatest concern associated with crematoria. Mercury is known to have cumulative detrimental health effects on human populations. We are probably all familiar with the warnings not to consume excessive quantities of fish that may have bioaccumulations of mercury. Mercury is a component of dental amalgams, and as such will be commonly present when bodies are cremated. The emission of airborne mercury from crematoria might be reduced either by limiting the introduction of mercury into the combustion chambers in the first place, or perhaps by a filtration system at the output. Limiting the introduction of mercury by removing fillings from the deceased might be the best approach to limiting the emissions of mercury to the environment. With educational outreach, this may be an acceptable option for families who wish to be environmentally responsible. However, there are also undoubtedly other families who would object to this procedure. The most feasible approach might be for mortuaries to offer this approach as an option to families who would be comfortable with it. We do not know what options might be available for filtration of mercury from the combustion exhaust. Other Pollutants A second issue is that radioactive particles could be released from the bodies of people who had been receiving radiation therapy by injected or implanted radioactive compounds. A study should be conducted measuring radioactive emissions during cremation of several such bodies, to determine whether this is a significant problem. If so, suitable emission control measures should be installed. In addition to the materials found within human bodies, there is also the potential for other materials to be put into the combustion chambers, including, but not limited to, various types of caskets. The composition of materials allowed in the combustion chambers should be strictly limited to those which are unlikely to release harmful substances in the exhaust. The optimal temperature for clean combustion must be maintained. Organic pollutants resulting from incomplete combustion should be measured and minimized. Location and Height of Exhaust Stack(s) We understand that the location and height of the exhaust stack(s) of a crematorium can make a great deal of difference in the dispersal of any airborne pollutants emitted with that exhaust. We understand from the Staff Report that Green Hills is proposing to use two small exhaust stacks, rather than a large one in order to be visually more compatible with the surrounding residential area. While the aesthetics of the stacks is certainly important to the neighbors, the dispersal of pollutants from the exhaust is also of primary importance. We suggest that the optimal height and location of the stack(s) be determined by a comprehensive air flow study that takes into account both the topography of the local area and the variability of the winds - which can range from coastal breezes to Santa Ana conditions. Recommended Best Practices The attached document, FIELD INQUIRY: CREMATORIA EMISSIONS AND AIR QUALITY IMPACTS includes BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES: The Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants has published best practice guidelines for crematoria.33 These align with other recommendations cited throughout the literature.19 The key recommendations include: • Minimum furnace temperature {850 °C}1 residence time in the second chamber (2 seconds for combustion gases) and enough air (e.g., 6% 02 by volume) to ensure combustion in the second chamber and avoid generating products of incomplete combustion; • Suitable air pollution control equipment, which could include temperature controls, dust control, carbon injection, fabric filtration, air tightness of combustion chambers and casings; • Monitoring of gas temperature and flue gas 02 and CO concentrations, application of relevant emission limit values and additional monitoring, including ambient monitoring of soil and air in the proximity of crematoria; • Avoidance of use of PVC, metals and chlorinated compounds in coffins and fittings; • Operational controls, inspection and preventive maintenance. Additional legislative measures can be effective in reducing emissions. For example, In Europe, Hg emissions from crematoria were reduced following the implementation of Hg abatement requirements.23 Other good practice measures to protect crematoria workers, such as removal of radioactive implants before cremation, informing crematoria workers a/recent radiotherapy treatments for deceased patients, and safe handling practices for ashes, can also reduce possible environmental releases of pol/utants.3,18,44 The removal of dental amalgams prior to cremation has been proposed as a measure to significantly reduce emissions of Hg but may be difficult to impose. Conditions of Approval for Air Quality need to be crafted before the new crematorium is approved We request that the City carefully craft Conditions of Approval related to protecting public health by minimizing the pollutants and toxic chemicals in the crematorium exhaust to the greatest extent possible. Crafting such Conditions of Approval should be done in consultation with appropriate experts in air quality analysis and in public health. Since this can be expected to take some time, we request that the City Council bring back proposed Conditions of Approval for the proposed new crematorium at a future date. Sincerely, Alfred and Barbara Sattler Attached: FIELD INQUIRY: CREMATORIA EMISSIONS AND AIR QUALITY IMPACTS, National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health https://ncceh.ca/documents/field-inquiry/crematoria-emissions-and-air-quality-impacts Prepared by: Juliette O'Keeffe National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health Centre de collaboration natlonale en sante envlronnementale PRIMARY INQUIRY A municipality received an application from a funeral home to install a cremator within their facility. Objections were received from nearby residents who were concerned about potential exposure to harmful emissions. A public health unit was contacted to help answer the following questions: 1. Do crematoria emit harmful pollutants? 2. Is there evidence of health impacts due to exposure to crematoria emissions? 3. What is standard practice for siting of crematorium in proximity to residential areas? 4. What steps can be taken to minimize crematoria emissions to reduce exposure risks? BACKGROUND In Canada, preference for cremation over burial has been increasing since the 1950s. The Cremation Association of North America (CANA) estimated that in 2016 approximately 70% of human remains in Canada were cremated, and this may rise to about 80% in 2020,1,2 The increased demand for cremation services can only be met by constructing new crematoria or expanding existing facilities. Both can be expected to lead to a rise in inquiries about potential health Di:-:c;l,wiH:< Th: infmrn;Jion r.novid,?d iH_1r(' fr.; i"<)r Hw prnpo:-)(' ()f ! 1;L1tc:d tc, en'/ironrniJntfJ! 1·1c1::1i~h i,-;sue:. Thls i;-; not (1 flit: infor'":t.1ti()!\ offen::d hure fh.)e~, 11ot ~~:.q~:.:r'_;:::de t·<.,dcrr!, pr(wi:1cirl. <H requL::l"i()n:-; risks to nearby communities. This field inquiry therefore focusses on crematoria-related air pollution and human health risks. METHODS A rapid literature search was undertaken for articles related to health and air quality issues and their association with combustion processes in crematoria. Articles were identified using EBSCOhost (Biomedical Reference Collection: Comprehensive, CINAHL Complete, GreenFILE, MEDLINE with Full Text, Urban Studies Abstract) and Google Scholar. Terms used in the search included variants and Boolean operator combinations of (cremat* OR "funeral home") AND (health OR illness OR irrita* OR annoy* OR emission OR "air quality"). Inclusion criteria were publication date (no date restriction), English language, and human subjects. Google was used to access relevant public agency websites and grey literature including Canadian public health documents concerning cremation facilities and examples of current practices elsewhere. Citation chaining was used to further expand the resource lists. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health - 1. Do crematoria emit harmful pollutants of public health concern? Types of emissions Cremation is a combustion process whereby a casket and human remains (or animal remains in pet crematoria) are incinerated at a high temperature in a closed chamber. Cremation in Canada is normally fuelled by gas and will produce emissions associated with fossil fuel combustion as well as emissions related to the material being combusted.3.4 This can include: Combustion gases: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NO), sulphur dioxide (SO) and volatile organic compounds (VOC); Particulate matter and fine dust: PM 10 and PM 25; · Organic pollutants: Compounds resulting from incomplete combustion processes or formed when organic compounds react with chlorine in materials such as plastics. These pollutants can include polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) amongst others; · Heavy metals: Mercury (Hg) arising from volatilization of Hg in dental amalgam in fillings and a small quantity of various metals in tissues of the individual, or personal memorial items included in the casket. The pollutants of most concern are those known to be toxic to humans and which can bioaccumulate in tissues (e.g., PCDD/Fs and Hg) as well as fine particulate matter (PMv), which can negatively impact the heart and lungs and is associated with some chronic illnesses and adverse birth outcomes.2•3•5·7 Evidence on the release of radioactive particles, following cremation of deceased patients who had been treated with radioactive substances (e.g., cancer treatments) has not been widely studied but has been raised as an emerging area of public interest and concern.8·10 Level of emissions Crematoria are usually considered small-scale installations with relatively low total emissions compared to other types of incineration facilities such as municipal waste incinerators or industrial processes. Crematoria contribute approximately 5% of total PCDD/Fs, 6% of total Hg emissions and 0.25% of PM 25 emissions in Canada 3·11 These estimates are based on the number of cremations reported per year and pollutant-specific emissions factors for crematoria.12·13 Most large-scale facilities generating high levels of emissions will report to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) for Canada. For the most recent year of reporting (2017), no human crematoria and only one pet crematorium reported to the NPRI. This particular facility processes a very large throughput of animal remains that is atypical of the volume processed at most human or pet crematoria. The relative contribution of an individual crematorium to local air pollution will depend on the other potential sources of pollutants in the vicinity, the number of cremations and composition of the remains, the design of the system, the operation of the cremator, and emissions control measures, as described in Table 1.14 Table 2 summarizes the literature reporting measured ambient concentration (MA), predicted exposure (PE), or measured flue gas (MF) concentration of PCDD/Fs, Hg or PM 25 Most studies report measured concentrations of pollutants in flue gas only. Few studies of crematoria emissions have measured ambient concentrations of air pollutants or modelled the predicted exposures. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health TABLE 1. FACTORS AFFECTING THE LEVEL OF POSSIBLE EMISSIONS FROM CREMATORIA The composition of the casket and remains The design of the system Operational parameters of the cremator Emissions control measures . • The size of the corpse can affect the initial combustion temperature, the duration over which emissions are released (1.5 to 5 hours), and the total quantity of emissions.13 Hg emissions are affected by the presence of dental amalgam fillings containing Hg.2 Up to 0.5 g of Hg is present per filling, some of which may be volatilized and emitted into the atmosphere.3·15 • Plastics or polystyrene parts in the funeral casket or personal/memorial items included in the casket can increase the potential for fine particulates and organic pollutants (e.g., PAHs and PCDD/Fs) to form within the combustion chamber.3 • Burial caskets coated in insecticides or preservatives can be a source of PCDD/Fs. Caskets made from untreated wood, cardboard, and similar materials release fewer harmful substances.16·17 • The presence of radioactive substances within the remains, either from devices or as a result of radiotherapy, could result in low levels of radiation or radioactive particles to be present in the combustion chamber.8,18 • The presence of two combustion chambers in a cremator allows for high-temperature treatment of gases and particulates, which reduces released odours, fine dust, and products of incomplete combustion (PICs) such as PCDD/Fs. • Chimney height can affect the distribution and dilution of emissions into the atmosphere and dispersion at ground level.4·19 • Older equipment is less likely to be fitted with modern process controls and monitors and may be more prone to failure.20•21 • Low start-up temperatures can cause incomplete combustion in the initial stages of cremation, resulting in release of particulates or PICs such as PCDD/Fs.20 '· High temperature (e.g., >850°C) and residence time (2 s) for gases in the second chamber can reduce the quantity of PICs released, as can ensuring sufficient 0 2 for combustion (e.g., 6%).3·20 • Modern equipment with process controls and continuous monitoring of pollutants can alert operators of operational problems. High carbon monoxide (CO) levels can indicate inefficient combustion and potential formation of PICs. • Absence of monitoring can lead to failure to detect operator error or equipment failure, resulting in possible unintentional release of pollutants. Flue gas treatment, acid neutralization, activated carbon adsorption, dust collection, and good operation and maintenance practices can reduce emissions of key pollutants.4·14 Measures that control the release of dust can reduce emissions of fine particulates and PCDD/ Fs.ir,,19,20.22 • Hg-abatement equipment, such as activated carbon filters, scrubbers, and technologies that bind or precipitate Hg, are effective at reducing Hg emissions.23 ·24 • Removal of Hg at source by the removal of dental amalgams prior to cremation can be both cost and environmentally effective; however, it is less socially acceptable, and difficult to impose.2s National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health TABLE 2. EMISSIONS LEVELS FROM CREMATORIA POLLUTANT STUDIES Study Location Study Type Taiwan 26 MA New Zealand 27 MA Virginia, USA2 8 PE Taiwan 26 MF MF Denmark30 MF ltaly 31 MF Japan 32 MF Example ambient air quality standards 0.0005 PCDD/Fs (ng TEQ/m 3) ······-._. (downwind of crematoria with no dust control) n/a 0.0000008 (max exposure) 0.0000005 (nearest school) 0.32 (bag filter) 2.36 (no dust control) 0.14 (single crematorium) -~··--··----··· n/a 0.2-0.7 (2 crematoria) 1 .13, 1 .1 0 (1 crematoria, 2 cremations) (various levels of emissions control) n/a < 0.1 (UNEP 33) Reference exposure limits 0.04 (C) . for acute (A), 8-hour (8) and chronic (C) exposure by inhalation 36 n/a Hg (µg/ma) n/a 110-120 µg/kg (downwind mean n/a soil concentration) 0.003 ( max exposure) 0.002 (nearest school) n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.8, 293, 76 (1 crematoria, 3 cremations) n/a 0.2-30.3 (average 3.6) (7 crematoria) ' 2 (24-hour average) (Ontario AAQC 34) 0.6 (A) 0.06 (8) 0.03 (C) (Hg, and inorganic , Hg compounds) ' ..... n/a n/a n/a 11-35 (120 min cremation) 25-205 (70 min cremation) No dust control at either crematoria n/a 2.2,1.1,1.9 (1 crematoria, 3 cremations)* n/a n/a 0.027 (24-hour average) (CAAQ 35) MA: measured ambient concentration; PE: predicted exposure concentration; MF: measured flue gas concentration; ng = nanograms; µg = micrograms; TEQ = toxic equivalency; n/a = not assessed *total particulate matter National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health - There is substantial variation in MF concentrations among the studies, illustrating how design, operation, and emissions control measures can significantly impact the levels of emissions released. Only one study measuring downwind ambient air concentrations of PCDD/Fs was identified but no studies measuring Hg or PM 25 . One study reported downwind soil concentrations of Hg, which was detected up to 30 m away from crematoria sites. Other studies in Sweden 37 and Norway38 have detected Hg in soils downwind of anthropogenic sources including crematoria, although the relative contribution and correlation with ambient air concentrations have not been reported. Determining relative contribution of crematoria emissions to local air quality can be difficult. Some countries have set specific national pollution control regulations for emissions of Hg and other air pollutants from crematoria, but Canada has no such regulatory limits at a federal level.23 ·39 Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS)35 exist for PM 2 _5 but not for PCDD/Fs or Hg. Some provinces may use Ambient Air Quality Criteria (e.g., Ontario 34) or similar standards for these substances; however, attributing ambient exceedances to a single source can be difficult. Computational air dispersion modelling using local air conditions, geography, and emission factors can be used to predict exposure levels from a point source of pollution. This approach was used to estimate exposures concentrations from a crematoria in Virginia, USA, (Table 2) and found that PE was well below reference exposure limits for PCDD/Fs and Hg.12•28 Reports to local authorities for proposed crematoria also use this approach but may estimate emissions using manufacturers' reported emissions factors. Most reports found on public body websites using this approach identified minimal or no impact on sensitive receptors, but potentially harmful pollutants such as PCDD/Fs, Hg or PM 25 were not always reported. 2s.4o.4 1 There are few studies that have assessed the release of radioactive particles from crematoria. In West Australia, an atmospheric dispersion study modelled lodine-137 (1 131 ) emissions following the cremation of a deceased cancer patient who had received a high dose of 11 31 shortly before death. The study estimated that environmental limits for atmospheric emissions of 1131 could have been exceeded at distances of 440 m and 1610 m downwind of the chimney, but ambient 1131 levels were not measured.10 Events such as this are unlikely to represent routine conditions, and following the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission's Radiation Protection Guidelines for the Safe Handling of Decedents, should minimize radiation exposure for crematoria and other death care operators, as well as the release of radioactive particles into the environment.18 2. Is there evidence of health impacts due to exposure to crematoria emissions? As mentioned in Section 1, the pollutants of most concern from crematoria emissions are PCDD/Fs, Hg and fine particulate matter (PM 25).2·3·5·7 PCDD/Fs and Hg are known to be toxic to humans and can bioaccumulate in tissues. PCDD/Fs are classified as possible human carcinogens and Hg is a neurotoxin. Exposure to PM 25, which can reach deep into the lungs, can increase the risks of heart disease, lung cancer, asthma, and adverse birth outcomes, and exacerbate other conditions such as diabetes. For these key pollutants, agencies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) advise that care should be taken to limit exposure, particularly for vulnerable populations such as babies, children, pregnant women, and the elderly. The level of exposure to these pollutants caused by crematoria has not been widely studied. A review of the literature found only one study that investigated National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health - health outcomes amongst residents living in proxImIty to crematoria. The study assessed the risk of stillbirth, neonatal death, and lethal congenital anomalies among babies of mothers living close to incinerators or crematoria in Cumbria, England, between 1956 and 1993.42 An increased risk of stillbirth and anencephalus was found to be associated with residential proximity to crematoria; however, a causal effect could not be inferred. In this study, the distance between a residential postcode and a crematorium was used as a surrogate for exposure. Some of the crematoria were located near industrial sites where other pollution sources may have been present, but neither emissions levels from crematoria nor ambient concentrations of pollutants at receptor properties were measured. The health impacts of living in proxImIty to waste incineration facilities have been more widely studied than crematoria. Waste incinerators tend to be much larger- scale installations, and also have more varied inputs than crematoria, but these facilities also produce combustion emissions including trace metals, particulates, and organic compounds such as PCDD/Fs. A review of the literature from 2012 on the health impacts of thermal treatment of municipal solid waste (MSW) around the world found that living in close proximity to older MSW incinerators with high dioxin emissions (e.g., 16-80 ng/m3 TEO) was associated with adverse health outcomes including congenital anomalies and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.43 These levels exceed all those recorded for crematoria (Table 2) as well as permitted dioxin emissions levels in Canada and Europe (0.05-0.50 ng/m3 TEQ). These incinerators also represent much larger point sources of pollutants compared to crematoria, processing in excess of 100 times the quantity of material per day. Other studies assessing health effects of crematoria emissions have considered occupational exposures to Hg, dust or radiation.9A4A5 The occupational exposure studies identified do not link exposures to any adverse health outcomes. Exposure to Hg has been found to be higher amongst crematoria staff than in a control population, and exposure to fine particulates may occur, particularly where there are no operational and engineering controls to reduce exposure to dust.44.4 5 A recent occupational exposure study following the cremation of a deceased patient treated with a radiopharmaceutical Lutetium-177 (Lu 777) found no trace of the radioactive substance in the urine of the crematorium operator but detected radiation within the crematorium and presence of another isotope in the employee's urine, suggesting possible exposure on a previous occasion.9 3. What is standard practice for siting of crematorium in proximity to residential areas? Table l identifies the many factors affecting emissions from crematoria. Ground level concentrations can also be affected by local prevailing wind direction and topography. In North America, there are no standard requirements for crematoria setback distances and no minimum separation distances are set at a federal level in either the US or Canada. Crematoria are regulated at the provincial/territorial level and regional or municipal authorities determine whether minimum setbacks are required based on relevant planning and environmental considerations. The literature search for public agency resources and grey literature identified many different practices, with some selected examples from around the world listed in Table 3. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health - TABLE 3. SELECTED EXAMPLE SETBACK DISTANCES FOR CREMATORIA FROM AROUND THE WORLD i England and Wales (UK Cremation Act)46 i 200 yards (183 m) between a crematorium and any dwelling house and 50 yards from i a public highway to protect residents from nuisance smoke and fumes and provide privacy to funeral proceedings West Australia 47 150 rn minimum separation distance South Afric . Heal 50 500 m from any habitable building l i US ( acramen o oun y, · California)51 500 feet (1 52 m) from any agricultural-residential, residential, or interim residential zoning district In Canada, there is a range of local zoning practices establishing permitted and prohibited locations for crematoria as well as other restrictions or specifications for setback distances. For example, in Ontario, the minimum separation distances (MSD) and the potential area of influence (AOI) for crematoria depend on whether the local permitting authority classify a crematorium as a Class 1 (e.g., MSD of 20 m, and AOI of 70 m) or Class 2 facility (e.g., MSD of 70 m, and AOI of 300 m).40·52 Elsewhere, crematoria may be permitted in conjunction with a cemetery or in specified zones (Industrial) with minimum separation distances between crematoria and sensitive receptors such as schools, daycares, libraries, or care facilities ( e.g., 30-60 m). 53 •54 Setback distances are not specified in all jurisdictions, and in these places, the siting of crematoria may be at the discretion of local authorities. 4. What steps can be taken to minimize crematoria emissions to reduce exposure risks? While there are limited studies on the health effects due to crematoria emissions specifically, the wider body of literature on the negative health effects due to exposure to substances such as PCDD/Fs, Hg and PM 25 indicate that best practice measures should be adopted to minimize the risk of exposure to these pollutants. In addition to local planning and zoning bylaws, regulation of crematoria varies by province, with oversight government authority ranging from consumer protection to environment or public health ministries. Typically, ambient air quality monitoring around crematoria is unlikely to be required due to the small size of the installations and the need to comply with other specific regional requirements for crematoria. In BC, the provincial regulator of crematoria is Consumer Protection BC, under The Cremation, Internment and Funeral Services Regulations. The Regulations require an initial engineering report to support operation of a crematorium, certifying that the crematorium complies with manufacturer's specifications, local bylaws, and provincial laws (see Crematory Technical Checklist). The Regulations also prohibit the use of plastics, fiberglass, foam, Styrofoam, rubber, PVC and Zn in funeral containers to reduce harmful emissions. 55 In Ontario, Environmental Compliance Approval through the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks is required prior to replacement or construction of human and pet crematoria to address concentrations of air pollutants on and beyond a cemetery property under normal operations. Conditions of operation and limits for emissions and potential nuisance from odour or noise may be placed on the crematoria to minimize local impacts. This can include continuous monitoring for parameters such as CO, as an indicator of combustion efficiency, which can affect the emissions of organic pollutants. In the Northwest Territories, under proposed elements for the Cremation Regulations, the Chief Public Health Officer will consider applications for crematoria and determine if proposed processes are safe. Applicants will be required to provide equipment specifications, design features, operational methods, control measures for reducing exposure to harmful microorganism and chemical hazards, and additional treatment processes.56 In Quebec, National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health the Environmental Quality Act Clean Air Regulation sets specific requirements for crematoria including device design and operational parameters. Monitoring measures are also specified, with a requirement to test emissions of gases into the atmosphere and calculate particulate concentration within a year of installation, and at least once every ftve years thereafter. 57 BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES The Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants has published best practice guidelines for crematoria.33 These align with other recommendations cited throughout the literature.19 The key recommendations include: • Minimum furnace temperature (850 °C), residence time in the second chamber (2 seconds for combustion gases) and enough air (e.g., 6% 0 2 by volume) to ensure combustion in the second chamber and avoid generating products of incomplete combustion; • Suitable air pollution control equipment, which could include temperature controls, dust control, carbon injection, fabric filtration, air tightness of combustion chambers and casings; Monitoring of gas temperature and flue gas 0 2 and CO concentrations, application of relevant emission limit values and additional monitoring, including ambient monitoring of soil and air in the proximity of crematoria; Avoidance of use of PVC, metals and chlorinated compounds in coffins and fittings; Operational controls, inspection and preventive maintenance. Additional legislative measures can be effective in reducing emissions. For example, In Europe, Hg emissions from crematoria were reduced following the implementation of Hg abatement requirements.23 Other good practice measures to protect crematoria workers, such as removal of radioactive implants before cremation, informing crematoria workers of recent radiotherapy treatments for deceased patients, and safe handling practices for ashes, can also reduce possible environmental releases of pollutants.3·18.4 4 The removal of dental amalgams prior to cremation has been proposed as a measure to significantly reduce emissions of Hg but may be difficult to impose. A summary of the influence of various control measures on the key pollutants of interest is presented in Table 4. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health - TABLE 4. EFFECTIVENESS OF VARIOUS CONTROL MEASURES ON REDUCING POLLUTANT RELEASE FROM CREMATORIA · Source control Removal of plastics, etc. Non-toxic and eco-friendly coatings or materials in caskets Removal of Hg fillings Removal of medical devices containing radioactive substances --- Minimum 850°C (2 nd chamber) Minimum residence time of 2 s (2 nd chamber) Air tightness of combustion chambers -· . . ---·-- Maintenance and inspection Operator training Emissions controls Dust control (filters and scrubbers) Activated carbon treatment Hg removal technology (binding, precipitation etc.) --_,... --- Adequate chimney height ✓ indicates the measure can help reduce emissions SUMMARY ✓ ✓ General dispersion and dilution of pollutants : higher into atmosphere Combustion processes can generate potentially harmful pollutants such as organic compounds (PCDD/Fs), Hg, and fine particulates (PM 2 5 ). While these substances have been associated with a range of adverse health effects, no studies have been found that show causal links between crematoria emissions and adverse health effects. The absence of emissions data for crematoria and ambient air quality monitoring in the vicinity of installations limits the ability to fully assess exposures and health impacts. A precautionary approach could be adopted that includes following best practice recommendations for design, operation, monitoring and maintenance of crematoria. There is no standard practice across Canada for emissions controls, monitoring or crematoria setback distances, but there are specific requirements set at regional and local levels. Appropriate setback requirements and other controls should consider equipment type, size, number of proposed cremations, local climate conditions, local land use and zoning and proximity to sensitive receptors on a case-by-case basis. Communication with the public about potential impacts and risk reduction strategies early in the development process can help to address concerns and inform appropriate siting, operational controls and monitoring. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The author would like to acknowledge colleagues at NCCEH (Shirra Freeman and Lydia Ma) for review of this document and their valuable feedback and assistance with referencing (Michele Wiens). REFERENCES l. Cremation Association of North America. Industry statistical information. Wheeling, IL: CANA; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec l O]; Avail- able from: https:/ /www.crematior~jji.li.Qo"mLr2.age/lndustryStatis1Lc:&. 2. Tibau AV, Grube BD. Mercury contamination from dental amalgam. J Health Pollut. 2019;9(22):190612. Available from: b.ttps;LL doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-9.22 J 90612. 3. Mari M, Domingo JL.. Toxic emissions from crematories: a review. Environ Int. 2010;36(1 ):131-7. Available from: b.ttp'l/www sc.i.encedlre_cu:;_om/.s.cje~Lar.t.icJeLpiiLS0.1.60.4.12Q09_0D2D-5.Q. 4. Xue Y, Cheng L, Chen X, Zhai X, Wang W, Zhang W, et al. Emission characteristics of harmful air pollutants from cremators in Beijing, China. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):eOl 94226. Available from: b.ttp__s://doi org/1 o 1371 /joumal pooe.0194226. 5. Lesk6w A, Nawrocka M, lqtkowska M, Tarnowska M, Galas N, Matejuk A, et al. Can contamination of the environment by dioxins cause craniofacial defects? Hurn Exp Toxicol. 2019;38(9):l 014-23. Available from: https://cloi org/1 O. l l 77/0960327119855121. 6. Thompson J, Anthony H. The health effects of waste incinerators. J Nutr Environ Med. 2005;15(2/3):115-56. Available from: b!tps://doi. org/1 0.1 080/l 3590840600554685. 7. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Health studies of criteria air pollutants. Sacramento, CA: OEHHA; [cited 2019 Dec 23]; Available from: https://oehha.ca.gov/air/health-studies-criteria-air-pollutants. 8. Smith TO, Gitsham P. Danell ST, Rose D, Hing CB. The potential dangers of medical devices with current cremation practices. Eur Geriatr Med. 2012;3(2):97-102. Available from: http.JLwww-sciem;.e.d.ir.ec_t.comLsci.enc_e/.art.lcl.e./pji/..S_l8.1.8-7.649J2Q0_0320. 9. Yu NY, Rule WG, Sio TT, Ashman JB, Nelson KL.. Fladiation contamination following cremation of a deceased patient treated with a radiopharmaceutical. JAMA. 2019;321 (8):803-4. Available from: https'l/doi.org/10..J..llilifj_a.ma 2018 21673... l 0. Calais P. Gaussian plume atmospheric modelling and radiation exposure calculations following the cremation of a deceased thyroid cancer patient treated with iodine-131. J Radial Prot. 2017;37(1 ):247-65. Available from: https'//jopscieoce iop.org/arti- cleO 0 ... 1 088/l 361-6498/aa5J e2. 11. Environment and Climate Change Canada. Air pollutant emissions inventory report. Ottawa, ON: Environment and Climate Change Canada; 2018. Fleport No.: En81-26E-PDF Available from: http://publications gc.ca/col!ections/collection 2018/eccc/En81- 2Ji-201 6-eng.p..df. 12. United States Environmental Protection Agency. WebFIRE. Technology transfer network clearinghouse for inventories & emis- sions factors. Washington, DC: EPA; 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 19]; Available from: bJ1ps;L/...ww.w3_,_e_p_g_JJQV/Hnlct1ifilL.webfi..ce/Jndex,htmL 13. European Environment Agency. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019. Copenhagen, Denmark: EEA; 2019. Available from: b.ttps_JLw_w..w~ee.a europa, eu/pu..b.li..c.a..tiJ2nsLemep-eea-gu ideb.illtl<-20 J 9/part-b-se..c1illal..g1ti.claoc.e:...chap.t.e..rsL5-waste/5-c-J - b:v/.vie .. w. 14. Gonzalez-Cardoso G, Hernandez-Contreras JM, Santiago-DelaFlosa N, Gutierrez M, Mugica-Alvarez V. PM 2. 5 emissions from urban crematoriums. Energy Procedia. 2018;153:359-63. Available from: http'//www,scieocedire..cLc.o.mLs.c.i..en.c..e/.allicJefpiiL S18L66J_0..2J...830 .. 8 .. 5.92. l 5. Kirnakova T, Nasser B, Issa M, Uher I. Mercury cycling in the terrestrial, aquatic and atmospheric environment of the Slovak Re- public -an overview. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019 Jun 17;26(2):273-9. Available from: b.:t.ms.;Lld..QiorgLlO 26444/aaemL.10...5..3.9...5. 16. Mininni G, Sbrilli A, Maria Braguglia C, Guerriero E, Marani D, Rotatori M. Dioxins, furans and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons emissions from a hospital and cemetery waste incinerator. Atmos Environ. 2007 Dec;41 (38):8527-36. Available from:~ sciencedirect com/science/a.t1icleLpiiL.Sl3..5223J 007006292. 17. Santarsiero A, Settimo G, Cappiello G, Viviano G, Dell'Andrea E, Gentilini L.. Urban crematoria pollution related to the man- agement of the deceased. Microchem J. 2005;79(1 ):307-17. Available from: httpj/www.sciencedir~ct.com/scierli:~/artlcle/pii/ $0026265X0400205X. 18. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. Radiation protection guidelines for safe handling of decedents. Ottawa, ON: Canadian N uc lea r Safety Comm i ss ion; 2 O l 8. Ava i I ab le from: h1tp;L/.o.uc.l.ea1salety,gLcaLengf...acts .. ::..an..d::r.egulatLQnslreg.ulato..r.y::..d..ocum.entslp.ub..: I ished/html/regdoc2-7-3/index .cfm#sec 1-2. 19. UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. Process guidance note 5/2 (12) Statutory guidance for crematoria. Lon- don, UI<: DEFHA; 2012 Sep. Available from: ht1ps;lLass_ets,pub..lis..hing.service,go..v"ltk/go_vemmentLup_loa_dsLsy_stei:nLupJoadsLattac_h: rnent data/file/611478/process-quidance-note-crematoria.pdf. 20. Takeda N, Takaoka M, Fujiwara T, Takeyama H, Eguchi S. PCDDs/DFs emissions from crematories in Japan. Chernosphere. 2 000; 40( 6): 57 5-8 6. Ava i I ab I e from: b1tpJ/www,sciencedi1ec..t..c_om/s.cLe.11ceLarticJ.etp..iiLS..004_5_65J599.D..0..2 .. 32 .. 5. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health 21. South Australia Environment Protection Authority. Audit report -Crematoria industry sector. Adelaide, South Australia: EPA; 2016. Available from: 1ittps://wwwypa"s,Lgov"au/files/12405 __ crematmia~dit 20L6.p_dJ. 22. Takeda N, Takaoka M, Oshita K, Eguchi S. PCDD/DF and co-planar PCB emissions from crematories in Japan. Chemosphere. 2014 Mar;98:91-8. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653513013945. 23. OSPAR Commission. Overview assessment of implementation reports on OSPAR Recommendation 2003/4 on controlling the dispersal of mercury from crematoria. London, UK: OSPAR; 2011. Available from: http_s.;//www,_o_sp_ar,_a.r.gldorum~o.ts1.EI2...6.2. 24. Hogland WKH. Usefulness of selenium for the reduction of mercury emission from crematoria. J Environ Qua I. l 994;23(6):1364- 6. Available from: b.ttp_Jldx,_doi org/1 o 21-3A.Lj~ql 994 004724251l02300060033x. 25. Hylander LD, Goodsite ME. Environmental costs of mercury pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2006 Sep;368(1 ):352-70. Available from: http·//www sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969705008569. 26. Wang L-C, Lee W-J, Lee W-S, Chang-Chien G-P, Tsai P-J. Characterizing the emissions of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans from crematories and their impacts to the surrounding environment. Environ Sci Tech. 2003 Jan;37(1):62-7. Available from: https://cloi org/1 O.J 021 /es0208714. 27. Nieschmidt AK, Kim ND. Effects of mercury release from amalgam dental restorations during cremation on soil mercury levels of three New Zealand crematoria. Bull Environ Con tam Toxicol. 1997 May;58(5):7 44-51. Available from: https://link.springer.com.L.arti: _Q]e/1(LL0.0-7/fillDJ2J3.9.9.llil39_6.. 28. Green LC, Crouch EAC, Zemba SG. Cremation, air pollution, and special use permitting: a case study. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2014 Mar;20(2):559-65. Available from: b.ttp_s://doi.org/1 0.1 080/1 0807039.2012.719391. 29. Chiu J-C, Shen Y-H, Li l+W, Lin L-F. Emissions of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans from an electric arc fur- nace, secondary aluminum smelter, crematory and joss paper incinerators. Aerosol Air Qua I Res. 2011 ;11 (1 ):13-20. Available from: http..s.:JLdoi.o.rg/lQJ_0..8QL1 04 7 .32.8.9.2QQ.5_.1_04ful.613. 30. Schleicher 0, Jensen A, Blinksbjerg P, Thomsen E, Schilling B. Dioxin emissions from biomass fired energy plants and other sourc- es in Denmark. Organohalogen Compounds. 2002 Jan;56:l 47-50. Available from: https://www,researchgate.net/profile/Allan Jen- ;ieJlQ/publication/299470191 Dioxin emissions from biomass fired enerQJ!_.plants and__Qther sources in Denmark/links/56fe8a- 7.cQ8ae6_5..Qa6.4tl'.2QI5,p_df. 31. Santarsiero A, Trevisan G, Cappiello G, Formenton G, Dell'Andrea E. Urban crematoria emissions as they stand with current prac- tice. Microchem J. 2005;79(1):299-306. Available from: http'//www sciencedirect cQIIJ/_science/article/pjj/S0026265X04002061. 32. Takaoka M, Oshita K, Takeda N, Morisawa S. Mercury emission from crematories in ,Japan. Atmos Chem Physics. 201 O;l 0(8):3665-71. Available from: bltp_sJ/www,_aJmo.s:chem.:pb_y_s,_net/10l36_65/2.010/. 33. United Nations Environment Programme. Guidelines on best available techniques and provisional guidance on best environmen- tal practices relevant to Article 5 and Annex C of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. crematoria. Geneva, Switzerland: UNEP, Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants; 2008. Available from: http_sJ/to_o_li~iJ. pops int/Publish/Downloads/ENG 12-Crernatoria.pdf. 34. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. Ontario's ambient air quality criteria. Toronto, ON: Government of Ontar- io; 2 o 1 6. Available from: http_s:/Lw.w_w_,ont.ari.oJ:a/p_ageLontfilk>_s_::.amb.Lent:air:qLmlLty::criteria:s..orted.:_c_ontamina!l.t:o.ame. 35. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. Canada's air. Ottawa, ON: CCME; 2017. Available from: http://airqua1ity:-qua1it- _e..d.clair,_c_r;;me...Qa/en/. 36. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. OEHHA Acute, 8-hour and chronic r:ieference Exposure Level (REL) summary. Sacramento, CA: OEHHA; 2019 [updated 2019 Nov 4; cited 2019 Dec 23]; Available from: https'//oehha ca.gov/air/gener- .aJ:info/JJ.ebha.::.a.c.u1e:8_:llO.l.JI:filJ_d.:chro..oic.:[efe~n-c.e:e_x:p o sure-I eve I-re 1-s u 1mnaf.¥. 37. Ljung K, Otabbong E, Selinus 0. Natural and anthropogenic metal inputs to soils in urban Uppsala, Sweden. Environ Geochem H ea Ith. 2 00 6 Aug 2 00 6;28( 4): 3 5 3-64. Ava i I ab I e from: bt1p_s;//J_ink,sp.tingeLco_rnJart]cJe/JQJ..OOD_sJ...QJi53_:0.0_5:9.D3J.:z. 38. Andersson M, Ottesen RT, Langedal M. Geochemistry of urban surface soils -Monitoring in Trondheim, Norway. Geoderma. 2010 May;l 56(3):112-8. Available from: bttp_;/.lwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/SOOl 67061100004Q..6. 39. Norway Ministry of Climate and Environment. Pollution control regulations. Oslo, Norway: LovData; 2004. Available from: bttps;Ll lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-06-01-931 /KAPITTEL 3-4#KAPITJEL 34. 40. Gradient Microclimate Engineering Inc, Couper T, Ferraro V, Foster J. Air quality study, funeral home/crematorium, Orleans Ontario Ottawa, ON: Prepared for 805503:1 Canada Inc (Guy Souligny); 2012 Sep. Available from: http;//w_ebcast_o_ttaw._,Lca/pJan/AlL I mage%20Referencing Zoning%20Ryl aw%20Arnendment%20Appl ication I rnage%20Heference 002-02-J 2-0068%20Air%200ua I ity%20 Stu.dy.l'_D.E. 41. Heggies Pty Ltd. Air quality impact assessment proposed crematorium Tuggeranong, ACT Lane Cove, ACT: Prepared for Canberra Cemeteries; 2009 Dec. Available from: https://www.tccs,act.gov,au/ data/assets/pdf fl1e/0003/395400/30-2443Rl RO.pdf. 42. Dummer T JB, Dickinson HO, Parker L. Adverse pregnancy outcomes around incinerators and crematoriums in Cumbria, north west England, 1956-93. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(6):456. Available from; http://jech.bm i,com/content/57 /6/456. abstrnct. 43. British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. Health assessment for thermal treatment of municipal solid waste in British Colum- bia Vancouver, BC: BCCDC; 2012. Available from: http_s;//www.r_e.S.f..~P.lLb.ll.c.at.i.oJJ/2fili3.18403 HealtlLa_ssessment_for ther- 111aLtreatm.enL0Lrnun.icjp_aLsoiid_w_aste_in_Bri_t.LsJL(:;_ol.um.bi<LE.Yj_d_e!l.c_(U.ev.iew_and.Je~o_rnmendatlons. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health - 44. Korczynski FlE. Dust exposures and ventilation control in the crematorium. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1997 Feb;l 2(2):122--5. Avail- able from: https://doi.org/10.1 080/1047322X. l 997. l 0389471. 45. Maloney SR, Phillips CA, Mills A. Mercury in the hair of crematoria workers. The Lancet. l 998;352(9140):1602. Available from: hUpJ/www...s..ci.BncJ~ .. diieCLCQITILS_cjmcelacticleLpil/S_Q_l4Q_6_7_3_6_0_5_6JD_5..0_l. 46. Banks AL. Notes on cremation and crematoria. Public Health. 1938 1938/l 0/01 /;52:111-4. Available from: http"//www sciencedi- rect.c_om.Lscie.n.c.elar.ticleL.piiL.S o o 3 3 3 5 o 6.3.8.8.lli21.9.2. 47. Western Australia Environmental Protection Authority. Guidance for the assessment of environmental factors. Separation dis- tances between industrial and sensitive land uses. Joondalup, Western Australia: EPA; 2005 Jun. Available from: https://www epa. 'tY.a_.gov.au/sites/default/files/Pol~DJLGuidance/GS3-Separation-distances-270605.pdf. 48. Australian Capital Territory. Separation distance guidelines for air emissions. Canberra, ACT: Environment, Planning and Sustain- able Development Directorate; 2018. Available from: https://www environment act gov au/about/legislation and policies/separa- 1illn:guid.e.li.n.e.s. 49. South Australia Environment Protection Authority. Evaluation distances for effective air quality and noise management. Ade- laide, South Australia: EPA; 201 6. Available from: J1ttp:/b:Y.ww,_ep_a,sa",-gQY.a11Lf1I.e.s/J2J_9_3_eyiiLd.Ls.til..O.Qes.pdf. 50. South Africa National Department of Health. The National Health Act, 2003, Regulations relating to the management of human remains. Pretoria, South Africa: Government of South Africa; 2013 May. Available from: bttps://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis document/2QJAD.9J.3.64.."i'.3r_g9.9.6_QgQil3_6_3..12df. 51. Sacramento County. Zoning code. Sacramento, CA: County of Sacramento, Office of Planning and Environmental Review; 2018. Available from: ht.1.pd /planning saccounty net/1.andl JseRegulationDocuments/Documents/Zoning%20Code%20Final%20Adopt- ed.%20Ju.ly_%.2_022.U0.2_Ql5lUpdate_~201o_%2D2015%2.0..Z.oning_o/.o.2JlC.ode1EJJecti.v..eo/Q2.0.M.a}d'o2DJ_l.%.2C..%2Q2.0JJ3lZnni.ng.%2Q_Co_de.%2.0 Effective%20September%2025%2C%202015%20%5B05-l l-2018%5D pdf. 52. City of Mississauga. Zoning by-laws Part 2 General provisions. Mississauga, ON: City of Mississauga; 2018. Available from: l711pJ/wwwfi,mis.sls_sauga,_caLonlinemap_s/pJanbldQ/Z.one.By.l.a_w!DZ_BB.l/P_ar_tto.20Lpdf. 53. City of Nanaimo. Zoning bylaw no. 4500. Nanairno, BC: City of Nanaimo; 2019. Available from: https"//www nanaimo.ca/bylaws/ \i'ie,v...B_yJaW/4..5.0.0 . .p_d_f. 54. Corporation of the District of Saanich. Zoning bylaw 8200. Saanich, BC: District of Saanich; 2003 Sep. Available from: b.llp_s_;_/./ www,,saanich.ca/assets/LQ.Qfil~Government/DQcuments/Planning/zone8200~Pdf. 55. Government of British Columbia. Cremation, Internment and Funeral Services Regulation. Victoria, BC: Queen's Printer; 2004. Available from: hllp://www bcla~ix/document/id/complete/statreg/298 2004#sec1i.on9. 56. Northwest Territories Department of Health and Social Services. Proposed key elements for discussion cremation regulations. Yellowknife, NWT: Government of Northwest Territories; 2019 May. Available from: https://www.hss.gov.nt.ca/sites/hsslfiles/resourc- e_sfkey~.cle.rn~n1s.::p_r.op_ose.d::c rem at ion-reg uJati.o.n::dis.cu.s_siorwdf. 57. Province of Quebec. Clean Air Regulation. Quebec, QC: Editeur officiel du Quebec; 2019. Available from: b..Up;f!legisque.bec,_gouy, qc.ca/en/pdf/cr/0-2 %20El %204.1 pdf. ISBN: 978-1-988234-34-2 This document can be cited as: O'Keeffe, J. Field Inquiry: Crematoria emissions and air quality impacts. Vancouver, BC: National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health. 2020 March. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health Centre de collaboration natlonale en sante envlronnementale © National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health 2020 655 W. 12th Ave., Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4 Tel: 604-829-2551 contact@ncceh.ca I www.ncceh.ca From: Matt Waters Sent: To: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 10:30 AM Dana H Graham Cc: Cory Linder; CityClerk; CC Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, That is correct-notice of the workshop went out to all RPV HOA presidents, residences within a 1,000 foot radius of both Lower Point Vicente and the Ken Dyda Civic Center, and interested parties including Terranea, Los Serenes de Point Vicente, and CHOA. ListServ are emails that go out to people who sign up to receive electronic notices on topics of interest, such as Breaking News. I hope that's helpful. This email and my response will be attached as late correspondence. Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p (,,, ,(c:-"'"':,, '•T ", ,, l \- From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 7:20 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date 1 Matt: Looking forward to a lively discussion tonite re the museum. I'd just like to clarify one point: you said notice of the 2/1/23 workshop went out to all HOA's in the City and residents within a certain radius --am I correct in that? What was the radius, and who else did it go out to? I am unfamiliar with Listserv, fwiw. Thanks Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 ( office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahqraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2023 11 :43 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date That's correct. Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 11 :42 AM 2 To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date OK. Assume HOA's were restricted to those in RPV and not, for example, the Ranch or Rolling Hills Park Estates at Crest and Hawthorne? Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2023 11 :37 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Thanks for your email. It did go out to all HOAs as well as by Listserv messages as well. Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p 3 From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 11 :36 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date OK thanks. Seems like invitations might have gone out to all PV residents (the primary beneficiaries of this) versus just the neighbors, which could slant the results in an anti-museum direction; but I understand the probably impracticality of that. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2023 11 :09 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, The setup will be simpler but similar to a Council meeting with staff in the front, the screen for powerpoints, and chairs for audience/attendees. Invitations went out to City HOAs, the Docents, residents near to the Civic Center and PVIC, Terranea, and other interested parties. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 4 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p (} ,~/! ~ . ..:,. 1 '., ' i ·,,,, ' \ ·~···, ,t~~,:;10'' \, ~ "',<::z . .3 , o ·i ·> From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 9:31 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date OK great, thanks. Is the room set-up similar to a CC meeting with podium, etc? Yeah, I heard this Paul Funk guy (who doesn't even live in PV) has rounded up some PVIC docents to oppose the museum. Other than a needlessly perceived threat to his little domain, I don't understand the opposition from him. I had a custom-made suit of armor for the La Venta hearing being held at the same time, but it has been re-purposed for this. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2023 9:16 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Thanks for sending the updated presentation. I'll make sure it's uploaded and ready for showing on Wednesday. The format will be more informal than a Council meeting. Staff will make introductions and give some background information, followed by your presentation. After that, it will be an open forum for the public to make comments and ask questions of Staff and PVHS. City staff will ask as moderator to ensure everyone who wants to speak is able to. Attendees will be asked to fill out comment/response cards as well. I'll send you the agenda once it's finalized. Should be an interesting evening. Feel free to call me with any questions. 5 Thanks- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p .·.,=e·"~ . ., .. .. ,,,, , ' ,~-, ' ' \,\ . ) ,, .... ,,1 ;, ' ' ,.! ') '~--:~J 7 0 ~- From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2023 8:35 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Matt, et al: attached is the presentation on the museum I will be giving Wednesday evening; a slight modification of the one I gave the PVIC docents (who now seem to be objecting) last September or so and to the Council last November. I'm just sending it so if you want to load it into the system, you can. What is the meeting format? Is it like a CC meeting where everyone gets 3 minutes, and/or are we sitting around the room in a circle like the Paris Peace Talks? Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> 6 Sent: Thu, Jan 19, 2023 11 :05 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Sounds good-thanks. Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2023 11 :04 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Yeah, sorry, go ahead. Trying to round them all up, but go ahead and post. At least some of us will be there. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) 7 -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Thu, Jan 19, 2023 10:55 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Following up to see if a Feb. 1 6pm workshop date at Hesse Park works for you and other members of the Historical Society. Please let me know as soon as you can since we need to start inviting residents and interested parties. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Matt Waters Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 8:43 AM To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Yes, definitely not just you and me. It would be a City-sponsored open-to-the-public informational workshop. The intent is to inform the public about the proposed 8 project, provide information, and solicit feedback. All City HOAs, interested parties, residents living near to the Civic Center and Lower Point Vicente, and the general public typically would be invited. The Historical Society should be there for sure. We'd like to start publicizing the workshop by the end of the week or early next week at the latest so please let me know if Feb. 1 works for you and the Historical Society. Feel free to give me a call to discuss if you'd like. Thanks- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahqraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 7:19 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Thaniks Matt: who attends this? low, when you say public, I assume the public is invited as well as any other concerned parties --it's not just you and me sitting across a table. The Board of the Historical Society is only 5 people (one recently passed away), and I'm guessing most or all would want to attend. If you can just shed some light before I approach them, that would be good. Thanks Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum 9 Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2023 5: 17 pm Subject: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Good evening. We have a tentative date of Wed. Feb. 1 at 6pm at Hesse Park for a public workshop on the PV Historical Society proposal. Let me know if that date and time works for you. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p 10 Subject: Attachments: FW: Social Media FB comments.pdf From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 8:17 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Social Media Matt: This is probably way too late, but when I saw how few people attended the 2/1 workshop, I posted a summary of the museum proposal on Facebook (only social media I spend any time on --and in groups interested in PV history --Palos Verdes Historical, Palos Verdes News, Palos Verdes Estates, etc), to try to get a sense of public sentiment. The response was overwhelmingly positive. I am attaching all of that reaction I can find, positive and negative, which I printed out and scanned since I can't seem to get it to just save to disk. Unfortunately, the topic was hijacked by someone who is apparently known on Next Door for doing such things and who had little to no familiarity with the actual proposal, and which resulted in a flurry of negative posts on Next Door. I would have included those here too, but I only seem to get Next Door on my phone and it would take me all week to figure out how to transfer/save/print/scan those. As far as I can tell, only one of those negative posters attended a CC meeting or the workshop where the subject was discussed. To the extent that the CC received emails from those people (and I can name pretty much all of them), they should be taken with a grain (perhaps a box?) of salt, as they came from folks with no knowledge of the project and as a knee jerk reaction to any development, no matter how noble the cause. See you tonite. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Wed, Feb 15, 2023 3: 17 pm Subject: RE: PVHS Response to Paul Funk Letter of February 7, 2023 Hi Dana- Will do. Your email and attachment will be included as late correspondence. Sincerely, 1 Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 3:08 PM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: PVHS Response to Paul Funk Letter of February 7, 2023 Matt: I was cc'd via US Mail on the above letter from Paul Funk of the PVIC docents, and have the attached response. Thank you for adding it to the stack. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 1 O PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 31 O 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Feb 6, 2023 12:40 pm Subject: RE: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Hi Dana, Thanks for sharing your comments and concerns about reaction to PVHS's proposal. 2 Your comments will be included as part of the staff report that the City Council is scheduled to consider at its Tuesday, February 21, 2023 meeting. The staff report will be available on Wednesday, February 15. Please go to https://ca- ranchopalosverdes2.civicplus.com/772/City-Meeting-Video-and-Agendas to access the staff report, City Council Agenda, and information on how to participate in the meeting virtually or in-person. Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p AO ·t:!"~.y•·· .• ' ',{. ' ~.,,,,, \ ..... ; \ '<9?J 2 0 1 From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 9:40 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop OK, just wanted to make you aware that the overwhelming majority of the negative ones come from those who didn't care enough to attend any of the hearings and are therefore commenting from almost zero knowledge of the actual proposal. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 1 O PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) 3 -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Feb 6, 2023 9:37 am Subject: RE: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Hi Dana, Good morning and thanks for sharing the link to the Nextdoor posting. I'll follow-up on the thread of responses that your referenced. The staff report that goes to the City Council will include a balanced analysis of all public comments received and the results from last week's workshop. Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 9:15 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Matt, You may be aware of the Saturday hijacking of the PV museum proposal on Nextdoor.com. Social media has a downside and unfortunately it has been displayed in spades. 4 An individual who has never taken time to learn about our museum exploration activities nor heard the RPV or Historical Society presentations went off on a wild tangent to generate a lot of uninformed responses to you and the city council. His initial posting is copied below if you have not seen it. I am not aware of any of those commenting negatively attending any of the informational presentations. In spite of your efforts to have a public hearing to invite informed responses, I am concerned that many e-mail responses that you and the city council receive will be frivolous, uninformed responses to imagined concerns. We desire and seek public input if we are to create an outstanding museum, but I must inform you that an irrelevant negative element of social media has invaded our process. Posted on Next Door, Saturday, February 4, 2023 Dear Neighbors-Some folks want to build a rather ugly looking museum on the beautiful open space next to the Interpretive Center. We already have a museum there, and it would be a redundancy. They basically want to put images in there with the history of Palos Verdes. All of that could easily be achieved with a DVD or YouTube video without destroying one of the last open landscapes. Take a moment to write an email to MattW@rpvca.gov and cc@rpvca.gov expressing how destroying this open land will eliminate the hunting grounds for the local great horned owls, red tail hawks, foxes, coyotes, and other creatures. It is no wonder the Palos Verdes Blue butterfly is almost extinct. We already have the Interpretive Center. The only ones who would benefit from this project are the contractors and anyone who has their hands in the cookie jar. Put the history of Palos Verdes in a video for those who want to learn. Why destroy more open lands? Send your emails today. We all moved to Palos Verdes for its scenic beautiful coastlines. Not to have more buildings to look at. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Fri, Feb 3, 2023 7:35 am Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop They can send any comments to my email and/or they can cc City Council at cc@rpvca.gov. I agree it was a very productive meeting. Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 5 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 7:11 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Matt: If PV people wish to send letters or emails to the City regarding their support for a PV historical museum, where should they send them? It has a ton of support in the community, but I'm not sure the City knows that. I know you want everything in by the 8th, but since I just woke up in the middle of the night and thought of this, that may not be possible. Anyway, please advise asap where they should be sent --at this point probably mostly emails. Thanks for a productive meeting Wednesday night. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 1 O PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahqraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Wed, Feb 1, 2023 9:29 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, No problem. I already combined the staff PPT with the PVHS PPT so I'll put these new slides at the end in case you want to pull them up. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst 6 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 7:09 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Matt: Will you tag the attached onto the end of tonite's presentation? They are just back-up pictures in case we need them. Either that or they can be a separate Powerpoint that whoever is running this behind the scenes can switch to if I give the word. Sorry this is last minute, but between doing business, trying to keep La Venta open, and Historical Society stuff, it's been a bit busy. See you tonite. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2023 9:16 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Thanks for sending the updated presentation. I'll make sure it's uploaded and ready for showing on Wednesday. The format will be more informal than a Council 7 meeting. Staff will make introductions and give some background information, followed by your presentation. After that, it will be an open forum for the public to make comments and ask questions of Staff and PVHS. City staff will ask as moderator to ensure everyone who wants to speak is able to. Attendees will be asked to fill out comment/response cards as well. I'll send you the agenda once it's finalized. Should be an interesting evening. Feel free to call me with any questions. Thanks- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2023 8:35 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Matt, et al: attached is the presentation on the museum I will be giving Wednesday evening; a slight modification of the one I gave the PVIC docents (who now seem to be objecting) last September or so and to the Council last November. I'm just sending it so if you want to load it into the system, you can. What is the meeting format? Is it like a CC meeting where everyone gets 3 minutes, and/or are we sitting around the room in a circle like the Paris Peace Talks? Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum 8 Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Thu, Jan 19, 2023 11 :05 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Sounds good-thanks. Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2023 11 :04 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Yeah, sorry, go ahead. Trying to round them all up, but go ahead and post. At least some of us will be there. Dana Graham 9 DRE #00877973 Top 1 O PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 31O613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Thu, Jan 19, 2023 10:55 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Following up to see if a Feb. 1 6pm workshop date at Hesse Park works for you and other members of the Historical Society. Please let me know as soon as you can since we need to start inviting residents and interested parties. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p .,, 0 (;~ r,: .~:?}}.·'. '" . . \~ j \ .. -~9;,,.._ _,,'1,') '·-~-.. , ,J I u From: Matt Waters Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 8:43 AM To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> 10 Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Yes, definitely not just you and me. It would be a City-sponsored open-to-the-public informational workshop. The intent is to inform the public about the proposed project, provide information, and solicit feedback. All City HOAs, interested parties, residents living near to the Civic Center and Lower Point Vicente, and the general public typically would be invited. The Historical Society should be there for sure. We'd like to start publicizing the workshop by the end of the week or early next week at the latest so please let me know if Feb. 1 works for you and the Historical Society. Feel free to give me a call to discuss if you'd like. Thanks- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahqraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 7:19 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Thaniks Matt: who attends this? low, when you say public, I assume the public is invited as well as any other concerned parties --it's not just you and me sitting across a table. The Board of the Historical Society is only 5 people (one recently 11 passed away), and I'm guessing most or all would want to attend. If you can just shed some light before I approach them, that would be good. Thanks Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 1 O PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2023 5: 17 pm Subject: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Good evening. We have a tentative date of Wed. Feb. 1 at 6pm at Hesse Park for a public workshop on the PV Historical Society proposal. Let me know if that date and time works for you. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p 12 2/21/23, 7:37 AM (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Learn 6d 6d Dana's Post X Dana Graham ... W> · February 3 at 7:49 AM · 8 A PALOS VERDES HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM The Palos Verdes Historical Society is trying to get permission from the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to build a 5000 square foot museum near the PV Interpretive Center, just inland on that large open field. They would be within walking distance of each other. We have thoroughly studied this and think we have covered most of the bases. Below is one of the concepts for the museum (and my favorite): it would blend into the landscape so as to be nearly invisible from PV Drive South or from the houses to the west. We have funding in place and are just awaiting City approval of the concept. As you can imagine, we have literally tons of priceless artifacts from the beginning of the Palos Verdes Project in the 1920's but, with nowhere to display them, they have been in storage since 2006. A museum would allow those interested in Palos Verdes history to view them, in addition to watching videos on the history of Palos Verdes and attending live talks in the lecture hall included --a repository of PV history easily accessible to the public. Consideration of this will be on the City Council's agenda imminently, so if you would like to see a museum dedicated to the history of Palos Verdes (all other South Bay cities have them), please email Matt Waters with the Parks and Recreation Dept at MattW@rpvca.gov and the City Council at cc@rpvca.gov. To facilitate cut and paste: MattW@rpvca.gov, cc@rpvca.gov. Palos Verdes Museum Concept -front- Learn More 6d Ot) Mari Stanley, Jean Hughes and 250 others 158 comments Like Comment Send htlps://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 1/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More JimnCindy Oliver Sounds great. () Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author IP (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Top comments If you have a minute, send an email to the City at the above email address. Sorry I couldn't make them come up as links. February 13 at 5:56 PM Like Reply 2w Cindy Leitner Burtt Dana Graham can you type them separately so people can copy and paste? Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author IP Cindy Leitner Burtt Your wish is my command --see above. Learn More Like Reply 2w 01,;,~ ;i Cindy Leitner Burtt Dana Graham sent my letter!! Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author IP Cindy Leitner Burtt Saw it --was great. Thanks February 13 at 5:52 PM Like Reply 2w Edited Learn More ~ Cindy Leitner Burtt Dana Graham any time Like Reply 2w Suzanne Kukel Godfrey I was unable to attend the 2-1 meeting but I'm 100% behind this. This is a beautiful homage to our childhood and I'm sure many of us would love to see the displays and maybe even have personal collections to donate or put on display. Love Reply 2w i~ Dana Graham Author IP Suzanne Kukel Godfrey Send an email Suzanne. You as a former nearly adjacent resident would carry some weight. Like Reply 2w .J February 13 at 8:29 AtJ"ti, Suzanne Kukel Godfrey Dana Graham. Will do, DG! Like Reply 2w 0 Reply to Dana Graham ... ~~ Dana Graham Author IP Suzanne Kukel Godfrey Btw Suzanne, your point about the opponents not having cared enough about this to attend one of the meetings with the City was really an excellent one, and thank you for your support. Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 2/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Reply to Suzanne Kukel Godfrey ... Tim Truby I'd like to see a PV museum that includes paintings and photographs of the PV landscape. After all, there's an intimate relationship between landscape and culture. Like Reply 2w February 13 at ,~AM D~na Graham ~uthor i> . . . . Tim Truby It will have all kinds of PY-related stuff 1n 1t, and we could certainly have relevant paintings on the walls. Like Reply 2w Tim Truby Dana, Personally I'm more interested in exhibits of PV-related landscape photographs. There are a number of excellent photographers in the community. And occasional shows might be an added draw. Just a thought. February 13 at 8:04 AM Sunset, Abalone Cove Learn More Like Reply 2w ~'~ Reply to Dana Graham ... Maura Lowenstein F b 1 03 Tim Truby I'm interested in the Tongva / Gabrielino Tribes that inhabited here. e ruary 3 at 8: AM O Like Reply 2w S Steven Trop Maura Lowenstein What else? Like Reply 2w Tim Truby Maura Lowenstein that would be a great subject for a museum exhibit if there's February 12 at 10:34 PM material to show. But that's beyond my range of knowledge. Like Reply 2w Reply to Tim Truby ... Laura Raab 0 • I disagree. A more appropriate location would somewhere in PVE, which was the main focus of the Palos Verdes Project. RPV was founded on the idea of NOT building on every last piece of undeveloped land. Like Reply 2w 010 https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 3/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More tO (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook CWGibbel Laura Raab that ship sailed a decade ago Like Reply 2w 03 fi~ Dana Graham Author IJI) Laura Raab There is nowhere to put it in PVE ... unless you can find it. I even looked at the Gardner Bldg in Plaza, which was for sale at $8.5 million, but it has serious moisture issues, as do most buildings in the Plaza. In all cities, there are zoning issues to consider February 12 at 10:33 Pfvand Pt Vicente is al ready zoned for a museum (the current Pt Vicente Interpretive Center). Our museum would only occupy a small corner of that huge vacant lot. I'm pretty sure if you looked at all the info we did, you would come to the same conclusion. Like February 12 at 8:46 PM Learn More February 12 at 8:45 PM February 12 at 8:21 P$~ Reply 2w Edited 0~11 Laura Raab Dana Graham if PVE does not care enough about their own history to create space for a museum about the creation of their city, then I don't see why RPV is obligated give them land for one. FYI there is open land at PVDrWest and Via Coronel. Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author w, Laura Raab One big advantage of the PVIC site is the commality of maintenance and existing docents. I believe that land at Coronel and PVDW is parkland, no? Lilce Reply 2w Edited Rob Clarke Dana Graham good point on the docents. My mom, Georgia Clarke, was a docent for many years at the current interpretive center. She also, like your mom, was an expert in the history of the Peninsula Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author w> Rob Clarke I don't think my mom was an expert. She had just happened to live here since 1947 and saw stuff. Like Reply 2w Rob Clarke Dana Graham in my opinion, that made her a "native" and natives are experts on the land they live on. Just saying Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author w> Rob Clarke OK. She knew stuff that happened before PV was on most people's radar, for sure. I remember your mom pretty well, as we have discussed. Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 4/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More February 12 at 8:20 PM February 12 at 7:12 PM Learn More (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Laura Raab Dana Graham the land the PVIC is on is also parkland, just maintained with tax dollars from a different set of residents. As an RPV resident I think we have enough things to spend our tax dollars on without taking on the responsibility of a museum building that is all about our neighboring city. I saw in another comment on this post that the plan of the historical society is to pay for the building and then deed it over to the city. That would mean RPV tax dollars would need to be set aside for the upkeep and maintenance of yet another building. We are already building a new community center at Ladera Linda and there are plans to eventually replace the ancient city hall buildings. I think that is enough for now. For long term the historical society should be looking at buying property for their museum so they would never be forced to shut down or relocate if the city/landlord decides to do something else with the property. Just go back and look at how the senior center fared in their quest to find a place on city owned land or all the money and time wasted by the city when the Annen berg foundation wanted to build a pet facility on that land by the PVIC. I do very much like the idea of having a museum, but not at the expense of a new building on virgin land when we have a half empty mall at the top of the hill as well as other empty or failing businesses scattered about. Like Reply 2w Lori Ernster Laura Raab I believe that is all you owned by the school district. Like Reply 2w Reply to Dana Graham ... Amy Barber Bergant Laura Raab good luck getting that through any committee or depat1ment in PVE. Like Reply 2w 02 ~) Frank Ponce F b 12 7:10 PM Put the museum where the old Bank of America once was in Malaga Cove Plaza. It is for e ruary at sale. Contact me as I have been in talks with them. It will be cheaper than building a museum and destroying natural habitat. Haha Reply 2w February 12 at 6:43 PM ~;'I, tJi? Dana Graham Author ii> Frank Ponce It's sold, and besides it has serious moisture issues in case no one told you. Like Reply 2w Frank Ponce Dana Graham I have not heard that. I spoke to the broker just a few days ago. A lot of properties in Palos Verdes have moisture issues since we live next to the ocean. Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 5/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More February 12 at 6:42 PM February 12 at 9:00 ArJ)) (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Dana Graham Author i> Frank Ponce Right, but that's not it. There are Artesian wells (despite the distance to Artesia) in the Plaza that those of us who have lived here forever know about. The B of A building used to be the Security Pacific Bank building in the '60's and water used to come up thru the floor. They couldn't stop it and so basically incorporated it into the decor and it just ran out the door and into the street drain. It was hilarious. The Gardner Bldg has pumps running 24[1 in the basement to avoid it becoming a lake. Like Reply 2w Edited Gregory Berg Frank Ponce moisture issues are from ground water. I used to work at PV Drug (decades ago) and there were times when there was several inches of water in the basement. Mr Reese used to have us dump pinesol to help with smell Like Reply Zw Frank Ponce Gregory Berg I work at 68 Malaga Cove Plaza. We have a sump pump under the building. Quick fix. Like Reply 2w ~ Frank Ponce Learn More February 12 at 8:03 AM Learn More Dana Graham I work in the Gardner Building. I have been there for over twenty years, and has never flooded even with the biggest rains. We have a sump pump under the building should there ever be water down there. It is not on 24/7. Like Reply 2w Frank Ponce Dana Graham it has not sold yet. I just spoke to them again. The B of A Building would be great for a museum. Why destroy more open space and spend millions when the building is already there ready to go. Let's explore this. Let's put an offer on the table. Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 6/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM February 12 at 7:16 A Learn More February 12 at 4:03 AM Learn More February 11 at 6:00 PM February 11 at 11:03 PM (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Lori Waltfield Frank Ponce i realize that it is not your personal preference that the pt vicente site be used for any purpose that might require a structure. i respect that, and the general conservation of nature message. but, your argument against it is based on exaggeration, and i don't find that convincing. can you persuade me without that? if we are going to invest in a museum dedicated to educating people about the unique experience of palos verdes, instead of insisting that we compromise on the location, tell me why the location you suggest makes a better PV museum. to me, a museum housed in a repurposed office building in the middle of the city is indeed just (as you say) "concrete and parking lot." it won't have any magic. why put it somewhere where you can't see the migrating whales that brought an entire colony of portuguese from the azores? or the grasses that sustained spanish ranching? or the site of the last 4 acres of japanese-american farmland? or a WWII nike installation? or the surf that pummelled the dominator shipwreck for half a century? it sounds like the bank of america building gets plenty of groundwater. does it hr1VP. thr1t P.r1rthy smell of disastrous bentonite clay when it gets slippery wet? why shouldn't we put this museum in the most beautiful location on the Hill? shouldn't it be next to a historic lighthouse, at the remarkable point where the continent itself turns a corner? Lm1c; Reply 2w Laura Raab Lori Waltfield We're not asking the hisorical society to "compromise on the location". We are telling you this is not your property so you have no right to build anything on it. Many other small-town town historical societies do just fine with a store front and a rotating or traveling display. Social media is here making it easy to announce to the community about your latest display at the library, or the mall, or your storefront office in Malaga Cove, Golden Cove, Peninsula Center, or wherever you can find space. Why shouldn't a museum about how man carved up a beautiful hill be in the very heart of the hill where there are already buildings, parking, and people instead of taking away more of the last bit of undeveloped land along the shoreline where people go to get away from the hustle and bustle. Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 7/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Lori Waltfield Laura Raab to clarify, i am not part of the historical society. i didn't know about this project until last night. i am an assistant lighthouse keeper at point vicente station next door. we execute weekly interagency cliff rescue training, and staff an open house for our display center every month. February 11 at 10:57 PM i can speak for how much a museum like this will be appreciated and will enhance the experience for people. after being closed for years due to COVID, last december we reopened on a cold and blustery day with no promotions. 189 guests from 13 states and 3 countries enjoyed the grounds! they park a distance away from the lighthouse and have to walk in. last month, when we had driving rain that was nearly horizontal, we still got 20 deliberate visitors from all over. this included locals as well as people who drove in from other beach cities like el segundo and hiked over from terranea. they expected we might be closed because of the weather, but they wanted to see it so badly, they took the chance. February 11 at 7:04 PM everything has a downside, and the downside to having a beautiful museum that people love is that you lose a bit of nature at the museum complex. you asked "Why?" well, their joy at experiencing the beauty there, and the history, and becoming part of the story is why we do this. Learn More Ji"\''', ... February 11 at 7:03 P .. v Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author a> Lori Waltfield wow Lori, very impressive Like Reply 2w 0 Frank Ponce Lori Waltfield it is all about conservation. Not about scaring up the land more. Like Reply 2w 0 Laura Raab Lori Waltfield I would also love a museum. Just NOT there. Like Reply 2w 0 Reply to Frank Ponce ... David Blitz Laura Raab Since PVE has many land restrictions on any remaining open space, it won't happen. Like Reply 2w Edited U Brian Donnelly February 11 at 6:41 PM In terms of the habitat, the military destroyed that a long time ago with the gunnery range they put there. Then it was all dug up again to clean up that mess. Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author w, Brian Donnelly Whaddya mean ? I was in the Marines and we qualified at that range. You will note that no one invaded the country 1970-76. The lead contamination was, I am sure, due to the Coast Guard and Navy --the Marines always hit the target. Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 0 8/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Laura Raab Dana Graham the contamination is from the propellant that forces the bullet out the barrel. Even if you hit your target you still get residue on your hands from firing the gun. Like Reply 2w 0 Dana Graham Author i> February 11 at 6:40 PM Laura Raab I understand. I spent 6 years in the Marines. This contamination was by the butts and consisted of the remains from the lead bullets. It has nothing to do with gunshot residue. Trust me, I fired the M14 there more times than I can remember. Like Reply 2w .,q, \ '1ie Reply to Laura Raab ... 1 ll , Chuck Fairbrother Februa~at 4:f3R8&ght, make LA VENTA the palos verdes project museum. It was intended to be the club Learn More house after all... it's a great place for the banker, developer, realtor kind of stuff,,, would make it a super cool historic wedding venue rather than just a disco party ......... Pt. Vincente seems more appropriately dedicated to preserving what's left rather than more of the same ... it's a bit crowded as it sits now when the weather is nice ... How bout an underground parking structure next ... a freeway off-ramp would be great too ... so many changes and population density increases but I guess it's all about the money ... kind regards Like Reply 2w Edited Laureen Vivian Chuck Fairbrother that's a very good idea! No more building needed ... just reuse! Like Reply 2w () Dana Graham Author IF Chuck Fairbrother We have been studying this issue for five years, which is probably five years longer than most people commenting on this. Do you really think we haven't February 11 at z:23 PM considered La Venta? The owner needs income off that property in order to keep it, which a museum would never provide. The property is worth about $30 million, and the historical society is unlikely to be able to raise that much. And that is apart from whatever renovation it would need to become a museum. Learn More Like Reply 2w Chuck Fairbrother Dana I have been studying land use, con mngmt, and realestate for half a century now, do you really think I did not know that? Just FYI dad was a moon shot enginar, like I said , it's all about the money ......... the benefits for the entire community are too great not to jump in that direction ... the city is already nudging that way ... btw ... the major is incorrect in that the sound issues can not be solved actively out of doors ... but we alll know that .... Interesting case study ... Like Reply 2w '*,;; Dana Graham Author iii> Chuck Fairbrother then, with all this expertise and superior genetics, you will understand how unworkable your idea of putting the museum at La Venta is. Like Reply 2w Edited https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 3 9/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook February 11 at ~O,PM . . ~~ Reply to Chuck Fairbrother ... Tom Clayton Bring back Bubbles as part of the deal. Like Reply 2w 02 Dana Graham Author i> Learn More Tom Clayton there's a group that is working on Bubbles. 0 2 Like Reply 2w Tom Clayton Like Reply 2w EJ.~ Reply to Tom Clayton ... February 11 at 10:43 AM Learn More Julie Webster Haynes Fantastic idea! Thank you for sharing Dana Graham Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author i> ~·-· 2 \la,J~ Send an email to the City at addresses near the bottom of the post. Sorry I couldn't make them links. Like Reply 2w Sanford Scholten Great idea! I was trying to remember the other places the museum had been. Definitely remember {I think) the tower at Malaga Cove ... but before then? like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author i> February 11 at 9:48 AM Sanford Scholten nothing before then, and we didn't own that building and so were subject to eviction, which is what happened Learn More Like Reply 2w Edited Sanford Scholton Dana Graham an that would explain why I couldn't remember anything before then. Thank you Like Reply 2w Reply to Dana Graham ... Juli Bliss Kinrich How exciting! I agree, this design is lovely. Lilce Reply 4d 0 ff~ Dana Graham Author 9> Thank you. Email the City at the emails in post. A bunch of people who are relatively unfamiliar with it have emailed against it. No idea how the City will weigh those since they didn't attend any of the hearings on it. https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent (!) 0 10/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook February 11 at 9:46 AM Like Reply 4d (,\~· Meg Walker Kudus to you, Dana. This is amazing! Like Reply 2w 0 Dana Graham Author iF Meg Walker thank you Meg. You're pretty amazing yourself. February 11 at 9:30 AM Like Reply 2w (f) Tom Clayton As long as they put Bubbles up at the entrance off PV Dr. BRING BACK BUBBLES!! Ledl II Mure Like Reply 4d February 11 at .M Dana Graham Author iF ' Looks like Bubbles is headed for a prominent spot at the entrrance to the PVIC. Learn More February 11 a Like Reply 4d 02 Barbara Labadie Dana Graham I hope so! Like Reply 1d 0 Reply to Dana Graham ... Michael Wedekind Be good if there was room to remember Don C Wallace -big time Amateur radio operator (W6AM) ... seeing as how the museum idea to be located at Wallace Ranch did not work out. Here is a lengthy 1984 interview with Mr. Wallace with lots of historical content: https://youtu.be/ESiVb-3 M HEY YOUTUBE.COM Don Wallace W6AM 1984 Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author .;, Michael Wedekind He will be included in some fashion. I met him a few times in the 60's. That Press Wireless relay almost became famous after the Pearl Harbor attack. Like Reply 2w Edited https:l/www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 11/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More Q Michael Wedekind Dana Graham Nice! Like Reply 2w () (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Dana Graham Author ij, Michael Wedekind I talk about Don Wallace in my lecture called "The Other Reasons Japan Lost the War" February 11 at 7:42 AM Like Reply 2w ~j Learn More Patricia Maria This is a brilliant plan! Like Reply 2w O 2 Dana Graham Author IF Patricia Maria Thank you. The best thing everyone can do is to send an email in support of a museum to the addresses in the post. Sorry they don't come up as links. Like Reply 2w Edited 0f3 Dori Mosich i Point Vicente park /whale watching center dislike dogs & have shameless trained people, who go way out of their way, to let you know they don't care for Dogs the pretty much attack all dog owners Like Reply 2w ;i'>' "' ffi~ Dana Graham Author IF February 1 oat · PM We figure we'll attract new docents for our museum. Sorry about their attitude about dogs. You talking about inside their building or in the open field? Like Reply 2w Jim Kuenstler It's private property Like Reply 2w Learn More Dana Graham Author ii,> Jim Kuenstler it's owned by the City Like Reply 1w 0 Ante Perkov This is the area where they shot down the Annenberg Dog Training Center correct? Like Reply 2w Edited Oz t:'.l--~~ ttt February 10 at 'MI1"PM Dana Graham Author a> -Ante Perkov only a small corner of it Like Reply 2w {") -~ _:;,, Ante Perkov Dana Graham gotcha Like Reply 2w ,J. '. -!v Reply to Dana Graham ... https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 12/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn. (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Barbara Labadie This is a wonderful idea, that I hope becomes a reality. Love the location and concept. Writing emails now. Thanks for sharing this Dana Graham! like Reply 2w Shelley Whyte Looking fo1ward to it! 2w 0 Uk R I February 10 at 7:47iM ep Y ll~ Februa Learn ~1 Silvia Deleo I agree. RPV is the perfect place. Like Reply 2w 0 Gigi Gonzalez Can't Wait -Love the rendering Like Reply 2w 0 at7:48 PM Hilaire Waltzman It's beautiful! Can't wait until it's built.the perfect location too Like Reply 2w (/) Cindy Leitner Burtt Cc@rpvca.gov (0 like Reply 2w Cindy Leitner Burtt Mattw@rpvca.gov (0 like Reply 2w Dale McCracken Ward Who owns that land? Like Reply 2w F bu 10 t MtPM Dana Graham Author ii,> e r ary a · The City. We will build the museum at private expense and deed it to the City when completed. Pretty generous, huh? Like Reply 2w Edited f1JJ Dale McCracken Ward Dana Graham yes C Like Reply 2w February 10 at 7:29 P~~ Reply to Dana Graham ... J Carrie Torres I LOVE THIS! 0 Like Reply 1 w Evelyn Kita So valuable! Excellent idea! Like Reply 2w 0 https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 13/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Dana Graham Author IP An email to the City is the best thing you can do. Like Reply 2w 0 Ginny Degrazia-sanders Any mention of those indigenous folks who were here b4? Like Reply 2w 03 February 10 at f?J.PM Dana Graham Author IP ··· Yes, there is a room devoted to the Tongva in the current plans. Like Reply 2w Ginny Degrazia-sanders Dana Graham perfect! Like Reply 2w 0 ()7 e·, ~i" February 10 at 6:56 PM ·-v Reply to Dana Graham ... Anne Wilson Better than destroying more of the Hill for McMansions .... Like Learn More February 10 at 6:56 PM February 10 at 6:18 PM Reply 2w 09 Frank Ponce Anne Wilson what is the difference? It is still concrete and parking lots. Like Reply 2w Anne Wilson Frank Ponce and you're a real estate agent....imagine that Reply 2w A~ .. 2 ~· Lori Waltfield Frank Ponce i'II take your question at face value. there are many differences 1) it will not be developed for the enrichment of an individual or for a city coffer, it will be a public resource that can be appreciated by all 2) a resource that helps people appreciate the unique history of the Hill will motivate them to conserve it 3) it is a change of pace from residential, commercial and industrial uses 4) the architecture is subtle and blends in rather then thrusting up from the landscape there are more points that highlight the difference between this and another (potentially obscene) mcmansion. Like Reply 2w Frank Ponce Lori Waltfield as you said, "will motivate them to conserve it". Let's not destroy what we have. Let's conserve it. If people want to learn the history of the hill, then make a video for YouTube. We don't need any more structures and parking lots. This is why we fled the city in the first place. Like Reply 2w 0 htlps:/fwww.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 14/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Frank Ponce Anne Wilson yes, I am. And I am trying to protect whatever space is left. like Reply Zw Dana Graham Author i> Frank Ponceyou fled the city? Thought you lived in Pedro. like Reply Zw February 10 at 4:50 PivvJ~ Frank Ponce Learn More Dana Graham why would you think that? My last name? I have lived in Palos Verdes Estates and RPV forever. Like Reply 2w u'l . ~,.; Dana Graham Author IF Frank Ponce that's impressive. I've only lived here since 1947. I made the comment because you said you fled the city. Like Reply 2w Edited ~\ Frank Ponce Dana Graham I lived in Los Feliz growing up. I came here for the open space, trails, ocean views. Not to look at buildings. Like Reply Zw Laureen Vivian Lori Waltfield well said February 10 at4:17 PM Q Like Reply 2w Reply to Frank Ponce ... Anne Wilson Frank Ponce high school....Titan or Seaqueen??? Haha Reply 2w Learn More Reply to Anne Wilson ... Dave Walquist I'd love to see that! (0 Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author w> Send an email to the City at addresses near the bottom of the post. Sorry I couldn't February 10 at 2:50 PM make them links. Like Reply 2w Laureen Vivian 0 So much lovely history and so many talented painters and other types of artists here locally .... It will be very popular Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 15/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Learn Laureen Vivian Beautiful rendering .... Is the roof green? Also one has to consider the carbon footprint and upheaval the construction will cause. In addition the parking lot will be a huge disturbance/gobbling up of open space ...... once again ... a nice rendering but more thought should be given to how to spend such an endowment .... Maintaining open space means leaving it alone .... Preserving what's there not digging it up and putting a sod roof in it.... Someone commented that La Venta repurposed as museum might be a nice reuse .... February 10 at 20li'M Reply 2w Edited Learn Dana Graham Author ii> Laureen Vivian yes the building is as green as possible and will "gobble up" only a tiny corner of that large lot. As to La Venta, we have been studying this for 5 years. At about $30 million market value, the La Venta property in unworkable; not yo mention having to deal with the neighbors. like Reply 2w Steve Alper The design is rather disappointing. Like Reply 2w Edited 0 Dana Graham Author ii> Steve Alper It will be subject to Planning Commission approval. Like Reply 2w Februa.t 7BelMi!lh Thomas I hope this design and museum come to fruition. Learn More Like Reply 2w John Glick A building in the Spanish style would be more appropriate! Like Reply 2w 02 Dana Graham Author ii> John Glick The exact design will be dependent upon the Planning Commission, but not too many Spanish buildings in that immediate vicinity. Also, there are a lot of considerations, such as not obstructing views and minimizing the visual effect. We only plan on about 5000 sf. Right now, we're just trying to get the location and basic concept approved, so an email in support to the City Council would be greatly appreciated. Like Reply 2w Edited 0 February 9 at 5:17 PM Mary Ann M. Vitug-Guanzing Dana Graham you guys have a great cause so I hope the city will grant your petition. It's important to preserve those artifacts and be shared with not just PV'S residents but it's going to be an added treat to the countless visitors admiring our beloved Palos Verdes. Like Reply 2w i!~ Dana Graham Author ii> Mary Ann M. Vitug-Guanzing Yup. Send an email to the City. They need to understand how much support this has in the community. Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 16/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM Learn More (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Mary Ann M. Vitug-Guanzing Dana Graham will do, thank you! Like Reply 2w 0 Chuck Fairbrother Dana What is your tentative timeline Proposal And please attach a proposed site plan for entire point ... February 9 at 4:3~'f>\.1 Reply 2w Edited Le,Hn More Dana Graham Author If) Chuck Fairbrother closest I have to that is the attached. Green rectangle is the building, red areas are lead contamination, making expansion of the PVIC difficult and expensive. Like Reply 1 w Gina DiPietro No. There's no parking for it, and more importantly, not adding parking EVER to any place b 2 alona the coastline is key to keeping the coastline healthy. No. No. No. Fe ruary 9 at 4: '.6 Pl'vt" Like February 9 at 3:q\~ Learn More Reply 2w Dana Graham Author If) There are a few existing parking lots there. The City has looked at this. Like Reply 2w 11 Replies Frank Ponce Gina DiPietro I agree with you. Create a museum so they can display images of what the landscape used to look like? It makes no sense whatsoever. The only ones who will benefit from such a project are the contractors and anyone who has their hand in the cookie jar. More gorgeous landscape will be obliterated so that parking lots can be laid down. This is a very bad idea, and it is horrible for the environment. Donors need to keep their cash in their pockets. This will never happen as a lot of folks will fight it. Annenberg tried building something there before. It was shot down. Like Reply 2w Gina DiPietro Frank Ponce well said! Like Reply 2w Frank Ponce Gina DiPietro send respectful email to city council. I will get the word out. Like Reply 2w 0 https:/fwww.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 2 17/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook February 9 at 3:01 PM ti) Gina DiPietro Frank Ponce so I should not include the phrase "Fuhgettaboutit" .... This is not Learn More my first rodeo with Coastal Construction issues, I will send a respectful email for sure. Probably worth noting that the last effort RPV made at using a shuttle for parking issues ended up costing RPV $32 per rider. That shuttle no longer runs. Like Reply 2w &1,:, E"" Reply to Gina Di Pietro ... .,,:.,.,.v Jeffrey Siegel should include battery 240! Like Reply 2w Frank Ponce I think before any of these plans go further, we should ask the folks who purchased multi- million-dollar homes on Calle Viento how they feel about having a parking lot adjacent to 0 February 9 at 1:2f,h~ homes. I don't think they will like that very much. Learn More like Reply 2w Frank Ponce Take a moment to write an email to MattW@rpvca.gov and cc@rpvca.gov expressing how destroying this open land will eliminate the hunting grounds for the local great horned owls, red tail hawks, foxes, coyotes, and other creatures. It is no wonder the Palos Verdes Blue butterfly is almost extinct. We already have the Interpretive Center. This would be a redundancy. Put the history of Palos Verdes in a video for those who want to learn. Why destroy more open lands? Send you email today. Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author i> Frank Ponce Frank this has all been looked at. Like Reply 2w Gina DiPietro 0 February 9 at 5:49 AM Dana Graham who did the Environmental Impact Review? Learn More Like Reply 2w 0 Dana Graham Author i> Gina DiPietro the city will required whatever of that kind of stuff it does, I'm sure they will provide income for someone. Employing common sense, I can't imagine much "environmental impact" except for reams of red tape. Like Reply 2w Edited ~) Frank Ponce Dana Graham it has been looked at by whom? Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author i> Frank Ponce architects, engineers, the City. Anything you try to do any more there is opposition, so we anticipated some. Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 18/33 2/21/23, 7:37 AM (3) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook t5:42AM Frank Ponce Februa {: The space you are trying to get a conditional use permit for is 5,000 square feet. The old Bank of America building is 5,875 square feet with a mezzanine. It's already there. No need to go through the costly and lengthy process of obtaining conditional use permits. It's ready to go. Like Reply 2w ,.o::.; 3 Diane Ongarato Learn More I just sent an email on behalf of my family. I would love for this to happen! •~ Like Reply 2w () February 8 at 1:09 PM Learn More February 8 at 11:55 AM February 8 at 11 :47 AM https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 19/33 2/21/23, 7:31 AM (2) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Katrina•s Post X 6d Katrina Vanderlip February 9 at 4:33 PM · 8 ••• Palos Verdes Museum Concept -front• Learn More 6d Katrina Vanderlip Learn Mo February 9 at 4:26 PM · 0 Letter to Rancho Palos Verdes Parks and Recreation Department There is a NEED for a history museum. The Palos Verdes Peninsula is unique in so many ways and only understanding the history makes one appreciate more than just its incredible beauty. 6d Frank and Narcissa Vanderlip never cease to amaze me the more I find out about their vision and generosity. We have a large collection of furnishings and documents to share with the public should a safe space become available to display them. The plan for a discreet underground museum with a spectacular view fits right in with the inspiration of modern architecture of our father Kelvin Vanderlip who brought the interesting designs of Marineland and the Wayfarer's Chapel to the Peninsula. I do hope the dream will come true. Katrina Vanderlip 00 You, Liz Musil, Sharrye Hagins and 35 others 5 comments Like Comment Send https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 1/19 2/21/23, 7:31 AM 6d Learn More 6d Learn More (2) Palos Verdes Past & Present I Groups I Facebook Top comments Claudia Fiorentino Gutierrez Is this the design proposal for the property by the Point Vicente Interpretive Center? If so, this would be perfect. Like Reply 1 w Katrina Vanderlip Author Claudia Fiorentino Gutierrez yes Like Reply 1 w Jude Schuler-Pollard What an amazing opportunity for the Vanderlip family to gift, sell, endow a historic piece of still owned property to such a place to preserve history. That would be so much more m9ani119ful than further encroaching on open space. It would also further and solidify the presence and history of Vanderlip contributions to Palos Verdes. There would be no demands and anonymity of a donor is dictating location, and who el<pects their name to be on a building that clearly isn't in the public interest. Something to be explored. What say you? Like Reply 1 w Katrina Vanderlip Author Jude Schuler-Pollard I don't really understand what you wrote. The land is not owned by the Vanderlip family anymore Like Reply 1 w Parvin Jannsen Jude Schuler-Pollard interesting idea they need to speak with the new owners. February 13 at 5:56 PM Like Reply 1w Edited Learn More https://www.facebook.com/groups/palosverdespastandpresent 2119 2121/23, 7:28 AM (2) Palos Verdes Peninsula Historic Group. I Facebook 3d 3d Dana's Post X Dana Graham ... Admin Top contributor +1 · February 3 at 7:48 AM· 8 A PALOS VERDES HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM The Palos Verdes Historical Society is trying to get permission from the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to build a 5000 square foot museum near the PV Interpretive Center, just inland on that large open field. They would be within walking distance of each other. We have thoroughly studied this and think we have covered most of the bases. Below is one of the concepts for the museum (and my favorite): it would blend into the landscape so as to be nearly invisible from PV Drive South or from the houses to the west. We have funding in place and are just awaiting City approval of the concept. As you om imagine, we have literally tons of priceless artifacts from the beginning of the Palos Verdes Project in the 1920's but, with nowhere to display them, they have been in storage since 2006. A museum would allow those interested in Palos Verdes history to view them, in addition to watching videos on the history of Palos Verdes and attending live talks in the lecture hall included --a repository of PV history easily accessible to the public. Consideration of this will be on the City Council's agenda imminently, so if you would like to see a museum Learn ~icated to the history of Palos Verdes (all other South Bay cities have them), please email Matt Waters with the Parks and Recreation Dept at MattW@rpvca.gov and the City Council at cc@rpvca.gov. Palos Verdes Museum Concept -front- 3d 3d View insights O(J Gus Highlander, Greg Barnes and 14 others Like https://www.facebook.com/groups/452921149853849 Comment 90 post reach 2 comments Send 1/19 2/21/23, 7:28 AM Learn More • 3d 3d Learn More (2) Palos Verdes Peninsula Historic Group. I Facebook All comments Eric Lindenmuth This would be amazing to have in the community!! Hopefully it would include some more parking. Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Author Admin +2 Eric Lindenmuth details will be worked out with the Planning Commission. I'm sure there will be studies Like Reply 2w February 9 at 4:33 PM Learn More https://www.facebook.com/groups/452921149853849 2/19 2121123, 7:27 AM (2) Palos Verdes Peninsula Historic Group. I Facebook Katrina's Post X 3d Katrina Vanderlip ••• -f . February 9 at 4:33 PM · 8 Palos Verdes Museum Concept -front - 3d Learn More Katrina Vanderlip 3d February 9 at 4:26 PM · 0 Letter to Rancho Palos Verdes Parks and Recreation Department There is a NEED for a history museum. The Palos Verdes Peninsula is unique in so many ways and only understanding the history makes one appreciate more than just its incredible beauty. 3d Frank and Narcissa Vanderlip never cease to amaze me the more I find out about their vision and generosity. We have a large collection of furnishings and documents to share with the public should a safe space become available to display them. The plan for a discreet underground museum with a spectacular view fits right in with the inspiration of modern architecture of our father Kelvin Vanderlip who brought the interesting designs of Marineland and the Wayfarer's Chapel to the Peninsula. I do hope the dream will come true. Katrina Vanderlip View insights 749 post reach https:/lwww.facebook.com/groups/452921149853849 1/4 2/21/23, 7:27 AM (2) Palos Verdes Peninsula Historic Group. I Facebook Learn 1\19,re Ill.JU You, Jim Gorsline, Liz Musil and 39 others 4 comments Like Comment Send All comments of'S';s "~-Guido Rietdyk ·i~ Terrific concept!! tr:) 2 3d Like Reply 1w • Barbara Labadie . Love it! 02 Like Reply 1w • Steve Shriver Top contributor Much needed!! 3d Like Reply 6d o~-2 Michael Brisdon Bornn ~ it's nice. Id rather see large slabs of palos verdes stone on those exterior surfaces. (a la Glass Chapel) rather than the small scale stones or bricks im seeing. Like Reply 3d Learn More February 9 at 4:33 PM . Learn More https://www.facebook.com/groups/452921149853649 2/4 2/21/23, 7:22 AM (2) Dana Graham I Facebook Dana·s Post X Dana Graham February 3 at 7:44 AM · 0 ••• A PALOS VERDES HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM The Palos Verdes Historical Society is trying to get permission from the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to build a 5000 square foot museum near the PV Interpretive Center,just inland on that large open field. They would be within walking distance of each other. We have thoroughly studied this and think we have covered most of the bases. Below is one of the concepts for the museum (and my favorite): it would blend into the landscape so as to be nearly invisible from PV Drive South or from the houses to the west. We have funding in place and are just awaiting City approval of the concept. As you can imagine, we have literally tons of priceless artifacts from the beginning of the Palos Verdes Project in the 1920's but, with nowhere to display them, they have been in storage since 2006. A museum would allow those interested in Palos Verdes history to view them, in addition to watching videos on the history of Palos Verdes and attending live talks in the lecture hall included --a repository of PV history easily accessible to the public. Consideration of this will be on the City Council's agenda imminently, so if you would like to see a museum dedicated to the history of Palos Verdes (all other South Bay cities have them), please email Matt Waters with the Parks and Recreation Dept at MattW@rpvca.gov and the City Council at cc@rpvca.gov. Palos Verdes Museum Concept -front- Ot) Carolyn Egar Christy, Katrina Vanderlip and 50 others 26 comments 7 shares Like Comment Share https://www.facebook.com/dana.h.graham.3123 1/4 2/21/23, 7:22 AM (2) Dana Graham I Facebook Most relevant ,:(\ Mark Cerasuolo ~. · I really like the partially underground design. Reminds me of the main entrance/visitors center at Longwood Gardens in Pennsylvania which is set into a hill. You'd never know that there is a huge botanical garden estate behind it until you walk through it Like Reply 2w Patty Garvey Excellent!! A'.•9, 2 'Jr,,il'~,,4 Like Reply 2w Sharrye Hagins Great d) 2 Like Reply 2w Cindy Leitner Burtt That's so cool. What an awesome thing to do while preserving your rich history and sharing it with others. It's very pretty and will be an asset to the community. I hope it goes through so everyone can enjoy it! Good job! Like Reply 2w Steve Shriver this would be great-we could hear the echoes of the rifle range overhead . Like Reply 2w • t)4 Dana Graham Steve Shriver That's what I think every time I go there. When I was in the Marines, that's where we qualified with the rifle every yearI@~One of the considerations is lead contamination in the soil which, of course, resulted from the Navy and Coast Guard missing the targets. Us Marines always hit them Like Reply 2w Edited Suzanne Kukel Godfrey Steve Shriver. I used to hear the rat-a-tat-tat-tat having grown up in the ridge above Golden Cove. Like Reply 2w Steve Shriver Just sent a letter to Matt. Like Reply 2w 0 Debbie Humm-Bremser I love that concept of building into a hillside. Good energy savings, no doubt! Oz https://www.facebook.com/dana.h.graham.3123 2/4 2/21/23, 7:22 AM • Like (2) Dana Graham I Facebook Reply 2w Dana Graham Debbie Humm-Bremser yes, I think we considered everything. Like Reply 2w Debbie Humm-Bremser Dana Graham "we"? Like Reply 2w (0 i~ Dana Graham Debbie Humm-Bremser Oui. The Historical Society has been looking at this for about 5 years. Like Reply 2w 0 Debbie Humm-Bremser Dana Graham then congrats to all. Well done! Like Reply 2w 0 Dana Graham Debbie Humm-Bremser the historical society Like Reply 1w Katrina Vanderlip Oh how I hope this can come true Like Reply 2w o;:; 3 Dana Graham Katrina Vanderlip An email from you and Narcissa would carry a lot of weight. Like Reply 2w ()2 Katrina Vanderlip Dana Graham up to my ears in my daughter's packing boxes for her move but will write on the plane home tomorrow Like Reply 2w ft; Dana Graham ,, Katrina Vanderlip Thanks. Just found out the deadline for them is 2/8 Like Reply 2w Katrina Vanderlip Dana Graham no problem will get I sent by Monday and will remind Narcissa to write too. Like Reply 2w Brian Butler I'm all for it!! Would love this museum! Like Reply 2w 0 Britta Carlson Latta I like the idea fl) like Reply 2w htlps://www.facebook.com/dana.h.graham.3123 3/4 2121/23, 7:22 AM Peggi Collins Sent email to Matt and Council. Like Reply Linda Henson Awesome! 2w Like Reply 2 w Marilyn Radford Edited 0 (2) Dana Graham I Facebook Dana, so glad you are behind this great cause. The concept building is stunning. Hopefully this effort will make residents more aware that the City Council, Parks and Recreation, etc. have made one of their top priorities increasing the size of our "urban forest". We were required to add 9 designated city trees around the perimeter of our property when remodeling. Neighbors and I paid to have the City consider the removal of 2 volunteer trees, which blocked the ocean, and coast view from our homes. We were allowed to remove only one. The other tree was considered more impnrt,int than the spectacular coastal views of PVE. At the time the City had more than 17,000 trees. That number increases exponentially, because those who build or do a major remodel are required to add a number of City trees, which remain a tremendous fire hazard. We need people, who want to protect our views to run for City Council. Please stir up some interest in that regard, if and when you have time. Thank you. Like Reply 1w Dana Graham Marilyn Radford Yes, trees in PV are like cows in India. I wouldn't be on any city council for any amount of money. Like Reply 1w Marilyn Radford Sad, but true. I can relate, but maybe you can encourage others. Like Reply 1 w https://www.facebook.com/dana.h.graham.3123 4/4 0 Rancho de Los Palos Verdes Historical Society and Museum February 15, 2023 Mr. Matt Waters, I was copied on a recent letter to you from Paul Funk which was disappointing. In that letter he took a defensive rather than progressive position regarding the new museum being proposed by the Palos Verdes Historical Society (PVHS). While stating no opposition to a PVHS museum he stated that it would be "a duplication of most of the topics already included in the PVIC museum". Yes, it would be. It would be an expansion of those topics. The PVHS studied the scope of the Peninsula history then divided it into those topics, or categories, to best define separate museum galJeries. Those topics cover the full Peninsula history and would be covered in a museum wherever it was located. The PVHS has no intention of duplicating PVIS displays, only to expand displays and education within a topic. Paul Funk's letter also stated that the new museum would interfere with the Outside Exhibit Project proposed as far back as 1970. This was discussed in the public meeting you chaired, and it is not clear that interference will occur. If it did occur, the museum location can be moved slightly within the planned area so long as it remains adjacent to the parking and within the PVIC coastal view shadow so that there is no additional loss of coastal view. There is plenty of room for both. Our architect, in considering the sloped area, is also seeking a "net ~ro" soil removal/addition, so that may slightly affect choice of museum location. The process of architecture, approval, and construction of a new museum would take considerable time. I expect, however, that it would be more rapid than the apparent slow pace of improvements at the PVIC and it would be done without direct cost to the PVIC and RPV. The Los Serenos does not want to commit to docent support; however, a commi1ment is not needed at this time. The PVHS will commit to working with Los Serenos on docent support. We anticipate that a new museum would draw increased interest and docent volunteers. We believe that ultimately the docent function must be integrated to best achieve a coordinated operation of the two museums. The PVHS stated goal is to re-establish an outstanding museum. It is included in our official name "Rancho de los Palos Verdes Historical Society and Museum". We believe that a collocated expansion of the PVIC best serves our objectives, PVIC goals and stature, and would be a substantial asset to RPV and the Peninsula generally. Mrely, D~ent Palos Verdes Historical Society Palos Verdes Historical Society, PO Box 3295, Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 A non-profit 50lc3 public service organization, Tax ID/EIN 47-0988647 2/21/23, 7:45 AM (3) Friends of the Palos Verdes Peninsula I Groups I Facebook Dana·s Post X Dana Graham ••• February 3 at 8:20 AM· 0 A PALOS VERDES HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM The Palos Verdes Historical Society is trying to get permission from the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to build a 5000 square foot museum near the PV Interpretive Center,just inland on that large open field. They would be within walking distance of each other. We have thoroughly studied this and think we have covered most of the bases. Below is one of the concepts for the museum (and my favorite): it would blend into the landscape so as to be nearly invisible from PV Drive South or from the houses to the west. We have funding in place and are just awaiting City approval of the concept. As you can imagine, we have literally tons of priceless artifacts from the beginning of the Palos Verdes Project in the 1920's but, with nowhere to display them, they have been in storage since 2006. A museum would allow those interested in Palos Verdes history to view them, in addition to watching videos on the history of Palos Verdes and attending live talks in the lecture hall included --a repository of PV history easily accessible to the public. Consideration of this will be on the City Council's agenda imminently, so if you would like to see a museum dedicated to the history of Palos Verdes (all other South Bay cities have them), please email Matt Waters with the Parks and Recreation Dept at MattW@rpvca.gov and the City Council at cc@rpvca.gov. Palos Verdes Museum Concept -front- (Oh~:) You and 12 others 2 comments Like Comment Send Top comments https://www.facebook.com/groups/4 7 5161219939337 1/2 2/21/23, 7:45 AM (3) Friends of the Palos Verdes Peninsula I Groups I Facebook Anne Wilson Better than building more McMansions Like Reply 2w Q3 Dana Graham Author Anne Wilson Way, and it would be incredibly unobstrusive. Like Reply 2w https://www.facebook.com/groups/475161219939337 212 2/21/23, 7:43 AM Groups 0. Search groups Last active 11 hours ago Palos Verdes Estates Last active 21 hours ago ft Community home {ffi Events • - MARINES· FIND YOUR PLATOON Last active 18 minutes ago Vintage Hi·Fi and Stereo Enthusiasts Last active 38 minutes ago BANZAI! Last active 15 minutes ago -;-" I survived U.S.M.C. Boot Camp Last active 12 hours ago ........., Bose Vintage Audio Group Last active 11 hours ago WWII & Military History https://www.facebook.com/groups/102385803200 (3) Palos Verdes Estates I Groups I Facebook 3 0 Dana Graham February 3 at 8:01 AM · 0 A PALOS VERDES HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM The Palos Verdes Historical Society is trying to get permission from the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to build a 5000 square foot museum near the PV Interpretive Center, just in land on that I arg e open field. They would be within walking distance of each other. We have thoroughly studied this and think we have covered most of the bases. Below is one of the concepts for the museum (and my favorite): it would blend into the landscape so as to be nearly invisible from PV Drive South or from the houses to the west. We have funding in place and are just awaiting City approval of the concept. As you can imagine, we have literally tons of priceless artifacts from the beginning of the Palos Verdes Project in the 1920's but, with nowhere to display them, they have been in storage since 2006. A museum would allow those interested in Palos Verdes history to view them, in addition to watching videos on the history of Palos Verdes and attending live talks in the lecture hall included --a repository of PV history easily accessible to the public. Consideration of this will be on the City Council's agenda imminently, so if you would like to see a museum dedicated to the history of Palos Verdes (all other South Bay cities have them), please email Matt Waters with the Parks and Recreation Deot at MattW®rovca.aov and the Citv Council at Discussion People Media Files Palos Verdes Museum Concept • front• Oc) Liz Musil, Sharrye Hagins and 19 others 1 comment Like Comment Share .,, Write a public comment ... Jill Sanders Photographer · Follow This is beautiful!!! Love that you are taking into consideration blending the building into nature. Let's hope! Like Reply Share 2w Andre Navarro February 2 at 8:20 PM · ~ Exploring Malaga Cove .. kelp forest with awesome Horn Sharks C: 'Ci https://youtu.be/42AFb9S65Yw 58/64 2/21/23, 7:40 AM (3) The Palos Verdes Peninsula News I Groups I Facebook Dana's Post X Dana Graham ... February 3 at 7:56 AM · 0 A PALOS VERDES HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM The Palos Verdes Historical Society is trying to get permission from the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to build a 5000 square foot museum near the PV Interpretive Center, just inland on that large open field. They would be within walking distance of each other. We have thoroughly studied this and think we have covered most of the bases. Below is one of the concepts for the museum (and my favorite): it would blend into the landscape so as to be nearly invisible from PV Drive South or from the houses to the west. We have funding in place and are just awaiting City approval of the concept. As you can imagine, we have literally tons of priceless artifacts from the beginning of the Palos Verdes Project in the 1920's but, with nowhere to display them, they have been in storage since 2006. A museum would allow those interested in Palos Verdes history to view them, in addition to watching videos on the history of Palos Verdes and attending live talks in the lecture hall included --a repository of PV history easily accessible to the public. Consideration of this will be on the City Council's agenda imminently, so if you would like to see a museum dedicated to the history of Palos Verdes (all other South Bay cities have them), please email Matt Waters with the Parks and Recreation Dept at MattW@rpvca.gov and the City Council at cc@rpvca.gov. Palos Verdes Museum Concept -front- Ot) Liz Musil, Kris Williams and 9 others 5 comments Ii Like Rt Comment IJ. Share Top comments https://www.facebook.com/groups/266614713395 1/2 2/21/23, 7:40 AM • (3) The Palos Verdes Peninsula News I Groups I Facebook Tim French I'd like to work on that project[if!JJ like f) Reply Share 2w 0 Dana Graham Author Tim French in what capacity? We do need people Like Reply Share 2w Tim French Dana Graham I am a local finish, carpenter. r@!q@ Like Reply Share 2w 0 Dana Graham Author Tim French OK, we've got a few hoops to jump thru before we get to that stage. Like Reply Share 2w 0 Tim French I know what it takes to get there. I've worked on many projects from the Shade Hotel to rock and brewsI~JJ Like Reply Share 2w 0 https://www.facebook.com/groups/266614713395 2/2 2/21/23, 7:47 AM (3) Dana Graham I Facebook Dana's Post X Dana Graham January 30 at 1:00 PM·(-:, The Palos Verdes Historical Society (of which I am President) lost its museum when the School District took over the Malaga Cove School tower in 2006. All the priceless artifacts went into storage, including the models Frank Vanderlip had built in France of his vision for Palos Verdes, Joan Crawford's piano, a length of the original wooden water pipes of PVE, and countless other treasures. We would like to build a new museum near the Point Vicente Interpretive Center in a corner of that big open field. The hearing on it is Wednesday night 2/1 at 6 pm at Hesse Park. If any of you old or new PV hands would like to see a museum of Palos Verdes' history, please consider attending this hearing or, better yet, speaking at it. Kind of like La Venta Inn, there is a small group that apparently opposes it for no good reason that I can see, and we would like to see a balanced prespective from Peninsula residents. The information appears below, and we hope to see you there. ·-. jr f:C J ;. \ • . • .,..J<~ Wednes.day, Fe-bruory ht 6pm-7:30pm Hes.se ?o.rk McTaggart Hall 29301 Hawthorne Blvd For more info conta.ct Mcttt Waters at mattwerpvca.gov or call 310.544.5260 .DES £SOCIETY TO el.JtLD A .ifORITS •;'!··.,·\·: ,:,::-._;>.:·-· .· . • • • I • learn more about the PV Historic<ll Society's Proposal • Discuss Pr¢'-> 0nd Con$ • Discuss Opportunitie'.'.i and Constraints • Offer your thoughts • Receive Staff Analysis Yicw th«> 11.1!..2:2 CrtyCouncil report to fo-.un mor"': (P_Y(,),;i.t:>'!!'P~lrn11n,\(.\:l)_(,;:1C,(\~:-•iJ_l_'.,:l'l>J!.1JI :;.2i-st,1JJ:.8,·,P.9.Ct Lt1USEVM I N ~-~u aro o JJCH'tot1 '"''11:f\ •J dlrnbUII)' &. ""'"° ar> a0:,:c..rrrno<1m1on to po,•1,lpo,o «i progromL ---4-•-__ ,.;.,,. .. ;.~ --~---"'.1--_._,.,.._.,.,._.-r, ... _ -... ,..,~ ,-___ ...i.-.,., ..... l~•l-••----~~....,. -.~n. https://www.facebook.com/dana.h.graham.3123 1/5 2/21/23, 7:47 AM (3) Dana Graham I Facebook WM'n<'i-W"\h-'lilt.il.N9\$!,.l/i$'"U"1 ~fw;J fl~~, 1>,;:.Qf~~, 'ifN'ti-H'f ~ ~~a)!\'ll?, ,;;;:1~,.,.,1~,;c,p,,,;,~,n. ~401-t:r,,rt~l1¥<;1. ll<m,tl'I0•~-'11 ~11t 4'11~m~i;;i~tm,s:i~ry~Qt~~~km Carolyn Egar Christy, Katrina Vanderlip and 47 others 35 comments 4 shares Like Comment Share Most relevant Patty Garvey Museums are important. I think you just need to get the word out there. I wish you the best. Doesn't PV have its CB own newspaper? Like Reply 3w Patty Garvey Do you have fliers up in the Library? Like Reply 3w Dana Graham Patty Garvey PV has the remnants of a newspaper, but I think social media is the way, given the short time frame. Like Reply 3w Patty Garvey What about a Fundraiser? Like Reply 3w 0~) 4 Dana Graham Patty Garvey We have had fundraisers, the next is the 2/8 program at La Venta with the owner (and me) talking about the history of the place. But money is not the issue --it's getting approval from the City. Like Reply 3w Rob Robinson Good luck with this. 2 like Reply 3w Karin Frasier Good luck Dana! A museum would be great. like Reply 3w ~t~~2 '-'"'"<_)ft Katrina Vanderlip Oh I hope it can come true as we have so many historic furnishings and documents to contribute! Like Reply 3w Dana Graham Katrina Vanderlip I think that meeting Wed evening is gonna be on Zoom if you'd like to speak. As with La Venta, your family carries a lot of weight Like Reply 3w Edited Mary Cochran Katrina Vanderlip Dana and Katrina my family also has some historic LaVenta docs as well! Our years there isn't really documented. https://www.facebook.com/dana.h.graham.3123 2/5 2/21/23, 7:47 AM (3) Dana Graham I Facebook Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Mary Cochran When were you there? like Reply 2w Mary Cochran Dana Graham 60s to early 90s Like Reply 2w {'~: \ 1 Kyle Ogilvie What a great idea!! .•.... .. 3w "":)3 Like Reply \r., Dana Graham Kyle Ogilvie another windmill at which I am tilting Like Reply 3w Valerie Varos Dana Graham Keep tilting, Dana as it just might work! You are an inspiration indeed for this worthy cause. Like Reply 3w lt'ill Dana Graham ,,~-Valerie Varos As I told the City, the La Venta hearing Is the same time and I had a custom suit of armor made for that, which will now be re-purposed for this. Like Reply 3w Peggi Collins Good luck! 00 2 Like Reply 3w Cindy Leitner Burtt Good luck. That sounds like a wonderful idea. It's important to preserve history and share it with people so they can enjoy and/or reminisce! Keep the memories alive Like Reply 3w Dana Graham Cindy Leitner Burtt It just amazes me that anything you want to do, no matter how righteous the cause, makes opponents come out of the woodwork. We kinda thought we had this covered with entirely private financing (no taxpayer money) AND we will deed the building to the City upon completion. I mean, whaddya want? Like Reply 3w Edited Cindy Leitner Burtt Dana Grahamoh no ... You have naysayers? I don't get it Like Reply 3w Dana Graham Cindy Leitner Burtt Yeah, it's unbelievable. One of the docents at the PVIC has got his knickers in a knot about it. Like Reply 3w https://www.facebook.com/dana.h.graham.3123 0 3/5 2/21/23, 7:47 AM Cindy Leitner Burtt Dana Graham wow. Like Reply 3w Cindy Leitner Burtt {3) Dana Graham I Facebook Dana Graham are they worried it will cut into their financing or something like that? Seems like yours would be a nice complement to theirs. Like Reply 2w Dana Graham 0 Cindy Leitner Burtt of course it would be, but one of them apparently sees it as a threat somehow to his little kingdom and is trying to organize opposition --right out of the playbook of the La Venta opposition. Like Reply 2w Cindy Leitner Burtt Dana Graham wow. I think there's room for two, especially if they are different. Do those people actually care about sharing history or do they just want to feel important? It's not about them. It's about sharing information and education and giving people a nice experience. Like Reply 2w Dana Graham Cindy Leitner Burtt Of course you are right, but I think your diagnosis is close to the mark at least for a few of them. Like Reply 2w Cindy Leitner Burtt Dana Graham -.:, Well I wish you good luck! Like Reply 0 Valerie Varos Cindy Leitner Burtt Well said, and I feel the same. Like Reply 2w Laureen Vivian Wonderful! I designed a museums when at IM Pei in NYC. And, I designed one in private practice in Greece ..... see it on my website! As a founder of the Michail Lombardo gallery at 69th and Madison and gallerist in NYC there for many years I can say it is one of my favorite typologies! If you are looking for professional input please don't hesitate to contact me. Like Reply 2w Chris Briggs Who in their right mind would oppose this? Like Reply 2w 0~2 Dana Graham Chris Briggs We thought the same. I mean this thing will be privately funded and deeded to the City when complete. Whaddya want? But, of course, certain people have their little fiefdoms and see a threat behind every tree. Like Reply 2w Edited https://www.facebook.com/dana.h.graham.3123 4/5 2/21/23, 7:47 AM • • Chris Briggs Yessir-Keep up the good fight Dana! Like Reply 2w -Chris Briggs When you can't win the araument. Correct their grammar, Haha Reply 2w Steve Shriver sorry I missed this! (0 Like Reply 2w Dori Mosich (3) Dana Graham I Facebook 0 My Mom and I helped build Lil Malaga Cove museum. Got alot of photos, they should transferr all of the artifacts over pt Vicente asap need help let me know. Like Reply 2w https://www. faceboo~daAS.f:1.graham.3123 5/5 Subject: FW: City Council Regular Business Item 2: Historical Society Proposal From: Eva Cicoria <cicoriae@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 4:32 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: City Council Regular Business Item 2: Historical Society Proposal Dear Mayor and Councilmembers, I find the Palos Verdes Peninsula history to be quite interesting. I appreciate that the PV Historical Society has given some thought to minimizing potential impacts of their desired museum structure at their desired building location, the Lower PtVicente Park land. I, however, fervently believe that the highest and best use of the Lower Pt Vicente Park land is just that-parkland-parkland with wide open coastal views and meandering, at points gently sloping, paths that residents and others will walk day after day, year after year, including into their senior years when other open space trails become too challenging. What better way to honor and celebrate our City's unique history of protecting our beautiful coastline? I walk Seascape and Interpretive Trail at Lower Pt Vicente weekly with my 93-year-old mother who every single visit remarks "What a beautiful park". She's not talking about the museum building, but the open parkland and ocean vistas. It is a gift to the community that keeps on giving and hopefully will in perpetuity as such spaces become increasingly rare. It's disappointing, though, that we can't walk the paths in the unimproved park area under consideration for a second museum. That area was the subject of many, many hours of planning and subsequent City Council approval quite a few years ago, but nothing has been done to implement the approved plan for light touch improvements such as paths and native plants. The area has been left to weeds and goat grazing. As I recall, the plan for paths and plantings was approved to be implemented as an initial phase, with later addition of PVIC Docent-desired discovery elements. Why the 6-year delay? Is it cost? Yet, the City is contemplating staffing another building that I assume would be significantly more costly. I will say that we enjoy PVIC and we might enjoy the historical materials others have accumulated and want a house for, but we visit PVIC at most once a year and I expect visitation at a Peninsula history museum would be similar. I have some additional concerns: I oppose enlarging PVIC. It was already expanded once. When does it stop? There's a lot of redundancy in the Historical Society's plan, considering the existing PVIC-adding another gift shop, office space, restrooms, meeting room/theater, kitchen. And storage space? Using this prime, oceanfront open public parkland for sto:age would be a travesty in my view. I sugges&. renting a storage facility, not on coastal parkland, for housing historical artifacts. Then bring them out for annual or semi-annual displays either at PVIC space or one of the many other existing venues with meeting space, advertising to attract people. Name the recurring exhibitions after the donor paying for the storage and transport, perhaps? By the way, what is happening with the history "museum" at the former Harden estate? I find it worrisome that "donor doesn't want it to be at the Civic Center. They possibly could donate more if needed. They want a stand alone building, something to put their name on". This doesn't sound like a city facility planned with our City's history of respect for our coastal open space corridor in mind. Please direct Staff to decline the Historical Society's proposal to build at Lower Pt Vicente Park and further direct Staff to proceed with the previously approved plan for light touch improvements for paths and native plantings at the unimproved area of the parkland. Sincerely, Eva Cicoria, RPV resident 2 Subject: FW: Objection to Historical Museum at Lower Point Vicente From: Susan Deo <nasdeo76@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 5:09 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: Objection to Historical Museum at Lower Point Vicente Dear City Council As a long-time resident of RPV and a member of Los Serenes de Point Vicente (for over twenty years), I object to building a historical museum at lower Point Vicente Park. This is a worthy project, but it does NOT belong at Lower Point Vicente park. It is not in line with the overall vision of the park as I see it, and how I and my friends use the park as a resident: the preservation and celebration of the natural history of Palos Verdes. It is a respite from city life, a beautiful park with natural habitat of plants and animals with glorious views of the ocean and marine life that reminds us what the Peninsula used to be. PVIC adds an educational aspect to this, sharing the long history of Palos Verdes over the millennia and explaining the evolution of natural life here. As a long-time educator (I have a BS in Biology and a MEd in Environmental Education), I appreciate and respect that the Interpretive Center has been designed to share this cultural and natural history in a logical manner that flows from one time period to another. As a resident I love visiting the park with all its open space and the aesthetically pleasing museum which is low slung and suited to the location, melding into the background of sea and land. Because of all the open space between the museum and the road it is a very inviting and wonderful spot that I visit often. We always bring visitors to this park as well! It is our pride and joy as residents. People love all the green space around the museum and whenever I visit I see many families and groups gathered there. An additional museum building would detract from this beauty and peace. We docents already provide interpretive and educational services on the natural and cultural history of Palos Verdes. We are proud of our extensive training program (three months plus) and continuing education. We are also proud of the highly regarded field trips we have developed to help educate students and families about the natural environment and how humans can interact in a sustainable way for all. And our field trips are VERY successful! Those of us serving as docents to PVIC visitors love sharing the flow of sea life, cliffs, early native residents through European settlement as well as marine life and human interaction, including the gray whales. We do not have the personnel or the time to add more to our work load and education--or split our duties any further by adding another museum. Our membership is already very busy with staffing tours of PVIC and leading field trips to Point Vicente and other city parks. Also, the current proposed site for this new museum is already spoken for. Los Serenes worked long and hard to develop an outdoor classroom addition to PVIC that would incorporate other aspects of our vision. I was one of many docents personally involved with the project: we developed the proposal, shared our ideas with the City Council, held public hearings and facilitated the addition of these outdoor exhibits into the city's master plan. The City Council voted in favor of this several years ago. We are in the process of completing the fund raising to develop these outdoor interactive exhibits. There is no room for this additional museum building at lower Point Vicente in the RPV Master Plan. Please do not take away the site of our future outdoor exhibits by putting a historical museum there! In closing, there may be a place for a history museum elsewhere in RPV, but NOT at Lower Point Vicente park. Please do not take away our open space and our outdoor exhibit area. Thank you. 1 Sincerely, Susan R Deo 2 Subject: FW: Historical Society location Attachments: Pen. Historical Society ltr. 2-20-23.docx From: Jim Knight <knightjim33@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 12:39 PM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: Historical Society location Matt, Please share my comments with the Council regarding the consideration of a location for the Palos Verdes Historical Society. Thank you, Jim Knight 1 ... To: Matt Watters From: Jim Knight Date: 2-20-23 RE: Palos Verdes Peninsula Historical Society project location Dear Matt, I think the Palos Verdes Historic Society deserves a permanent location to display the history of the Peninsula. But in the past Rancho Palos Verdes seems to be the default location for numerous projects that benefit not only other Peninsula cities but other communities beyond. The very unpopular Annenberg domestic pet project is just one example proposed in the open space at RPV's Lower Point Vicente. I don't think the Historical Society project should move forward until all Peninsula cities and the Library District have jointly coordinated a feasibility study for the Peninsula wide history project location. The PVLD's Local History Center I am sure would be very interested in what the Historical Society has to offer. Their mission statement reads as follows: "The Local History Center is charged with gathering historical material related to all aspects of Peninsula history including its Spanish land grant days, cattle and sheep ranching, agricultural days, early land development, city formation, and current life Link to their history site: https://www.pvld.org/localhistory/about With that said, I do have comments if Council wants to do a feasibility study for RPV ahead of the other cities or the library district. 1) A new building structure for the Historical Society at the Pt. Vicente Museum at Lower Point Vicente should not be built. This site is, and should always be, for the discovery and education about our beautiful marine environment. The Museum could add a display in the existing building for something like the mid-19 th century whale hunting history and locations as well as keep the current Marineland history. But other terrestrial history needs a different location. The displays at the Pt. Vicente Museum related to early Spanish ranching, Vanderlip purchase, and other non-marine history should be moved to the City Hall project or another City if they want to provide a location for the museum. 2) The City is currently reviewing a new Civic Center and could incorporate historical aspects related to the formation of the City, the WWII gunnery site, NIKE missile site and any other history related to RPV. Thank you, Jim Knight Subject: FW: No on museum idea. -----Origina I Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 10:44 AM To: VANESSA DEAN <vdeanliz@aol.com> Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: No on museum idea. To Vanessa Dean: Thanks for submitting your email. It will be provided to City Council in advance of tonight's Feb. 21 meeting as late correspondence. Please go to https://ca-ranchopalosverdes2.civicplus.com/772/City-Meeting-Video-and-Agendas to access the staff report, City Council Agenda, and information on how to participate in the meeting virtually or in-person. Sincerely- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -{310) 544-5218 p -----Original Message----- From: VANESSA DEAN <vdeanliz@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 9:10 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: No on museum idea. EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe!!!. As a resident 24 years of Palos Verdes and 3rd generation resident of South Bay. My vote is NO. There are many city funded pop up events during the year that could be utilized to show off the exhibits for publicity. Or even long time established retailers or commercial buildings or library's on the hill that I'm sure would be willing to offer a wall or small glass case to show off PV history/mementos. Vanessa Dean Sent from my iPhone 1 Subject: FW: PVHS Museum Proposal From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 10:51 AM To: David Eaton <davidteaton@gmail.com> Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: PVHS Museum Proposal To David Eaton: Thanks for submitting your email regarding the Palos Verdes Historical Society proposal. It will be provided to City Council in advance of tonight's Feb. 21 meeting as late correspondence. Please go to https://ca-ranchopalosverdes2.civicplus.com/772/City-Meeting-Video-and- Agendas to access the staff report, City Council Agenda, and information on how to participate in the meeting virtually or in-person. Sincerely- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p 1 From: David Eaton <davidteaton@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2023 6:17 PM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: PVHS Museum Proposal Dear Mr. Waters: I have just finished reading the Agenda Report for Regular Business Item #2 of Tuesday's City Council Meeting. Regretfully, I am not able to attend the meeting in person. I am taking a course at Harbor that meets once weekly on Tuesday's at 7:05 pm; attendance is mandatory. First, I want to thank you and the City staff for producing such a comprehensive report. My only regret is that so few members of our community will read your work. It's not exactly easy to find unless one knows what to look for, and where to look for it. Having said all that, I want to voice my opposition to the proposed museum at the PVIC site. Our city needs to retain its existing opens spaces and add more where feasible. Adding a new building on beautiful piece of ocean view land when there is a less obtrusive alternative is antithetical to why many of us moved here. I am troubled by the idea the donor's funding is predicated on a building on the PVIC or no building at all. I think Dana Graham addressed the proverbial elephant in the room at the February 1 community meeting when he said "They [the donor] want a stand alone building, something to put their name on. But, the donation is specific to the PVIC location." The donor's interest seems more in line with memorializing themselves than doing what's in the best interest of our community. Lastly, the $378,000 annual operating cost, which you write "would be expected to escalate significantly by the time construction is completed" is a potential financial black hole for the City and its taxpayers. The City ought to do a multi-year projection of those costs provide the community with specificity around the actual potential costs 5, 10 orl 5 years down the road. We do not need another Portuguese Bend with its recurring, and escalating, costs. The donor, who Graham said "could possibly donate more if needed" should be required to establish an endowment to defray the museum's operating costs as a condition of approval. Under no circumstances should the bill for staffing and running the museum simply be handed to the City's taxpayers. I appreciate your work and I thank you. 2 Regards. -d David Eaton (310) 339-9546 3 Subject: Attachments: FW: Public comment on Agenda Item 3 for February 21, 2023 Brush-Clearance-Annual-Notice-FAQs.pdf From: Jesse Villalpando <jvillalpando@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 3:48 PM To: gwen@butterfieldcommunications.com; jwmrtn8@outlook.com Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: Public comment on Agenda Item 3 for February 21, 2023 Good afternoon Ms. Butterfield, Thank you for your email regarding Agenda Item# 3 on Available Resources for Wildfire Residential Property Insurance Coverage for Rancho Palos Verdes Residents. Your comments will be included as late correspondence to the Council. As you are aware, the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD} has recently distributed a Defensible Space Annual Notice to Palos Verdes Peninsula residents. In partnership with the (LACoFD}, the four cities of the Palos Verdes Peninsula have created the attached Brush Clearance Annual Notice Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs} document to provide residents with additional information regarding the current requirements for brush clearance. I have highlighted some of the pertinent details below that hopefully address a few of your specific questions: -Does this year's inspection and going forward cover every parcel in Rancho Palos Verdes or not? • CAL FIRE has designated nearly the entire city of Rancho Palos Verdes as a Very High fire hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ}. • California Public Resources Code 4291 mandates that single-family homes within the VHFHSZ maintain defensible space at all times. • The LA County Fire Department (LACoFD} conducts defensible space inspections primarily on residential single-family homes; and will concentrate on single-family homes this year, adding multifamily homes and condominiums the following year. -Also, if only certain parcels were added to be inspected, why were they added and not others? • Over the past two years, the LACoFD has integrated mapping technology into its Defensible Space Inspection Program using a geospatial database that is significantly more accurate than the visual identification previously used. • Numerous uninspected Palos Verdes Peninsula parcels have been identified using this criterion- based mapping system. These are the very first homeowners to receive the inspection notice. Are all residents' properties are affected for the 2023 inspection and for Zone 0 in 2024 and future years? • State Assembly Bill 3074 (AB-3074} established Zone 0, which is a 5-foot Ember Resistant Zone that requires removal of all flammable materials within 5 feet of any structure. -Zone 0 requirements will not be enforced until 2024, the LACoFD will be using this year's inspections to 1 0 educate property owners on what they need to do to become compliant with next year's Zone 0 requirements. Is the new inspection fee of $100 for 2023, which is on 2024 tax bill and the $151 for 2024 on the 2025 property tax bill for every home and parcel in Rancho Palos Verdes? • In December of 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved an inspection fee $151.00 to be applied to your November Tax Bill. • The fee will be phased in over 3 years (2021 -$50.00, 2022 -$100.00, and 2023 -$151.00). What does the current regulatory draft in Sacramento look like and how do we send comments to the Department of Forestry? • AB 3074 became law on January 1, 2021 but will not be enforced until the State approves vegetation clearance requirements; this is expected in the fall of 2023. Full enforcement on existing structures will not be required until one year after the State approves final requirements. This is expected for inspections that will occur in 2024. Full enforcement on new construction will take effect immediately upon approval of final clearance requirements. Additional information on this topic is available here: • fire.lacounty.gov/fire-hazard-reduction-program • LA County Fire Defensible Space Booklet • Brush Clearance Annual Notice FAQs If you have any additional questions or would like to discuss this topic further, please contact me using the information in my signature line below. Thank you Jesse Villalpando Senior Administrative Analyst Emergency Preparedness Jvillalpando@rpvca.gov Phone -{310) 544-5209 Address: 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov This e-mail message co11tains inforrmtion belongin9 to the City of Rancho l'alos Ve1·des, which may be p1•ivileged, conficlenl:ic1I, and/or prol:cctecl from clisdosLwe. The information is intended only fo1· use' of the indivicluai or entity n2m,ed. Unauthorized dissemination, clistribul:ion, or copyin9 is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, or are not an intended recipient, p!(,ase notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your cissistance and cooperation. City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. Appointments are strongly encouraged, and virtual appointments are available. Many services are available online, including plan check review services. To schedule an appointment, visit the Staff Directory on the City website to find the appropriate department. Some employees may be working remotely. Please be patient with us as there may be delays or minor inconveniences in responding to your inquiry. 2 From: Megan Barnes <mbarnes@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 1:56 PM To: Jesse Villalpando <jvillalpando@rpvca.gov> Cc: Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov> Subject: FW: Public comment on Agenda Item 3 for February 21, 2023 From: Gwen Butterfield <gwen@butterfieldcommunications.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 12:58 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: FW: Public comment on Agenda Item 3 for February 21, 2023 Resending just I case did not go thru earlier today. Thanks, Gwen Butterfield and Jim Maclellan From: Jim Maclellan <jwmrtn8@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 11:32 AM To: to <cc@rpvca.gov> Cc: Gwen Butterfield <gwen@butterfieldcommunications.com> Subject: Public comment on Agenda Item 3 for February 21, 2023 Please find attached comment on Agenda Item 3 for February 21, 2023 Thank you very much, Jim Maclellan & Gwen Butterfield 3 Public Comment on Agenda Item 3 for February 21, 2023 For the first time we received an annual brush clearance notice for an inspection after June 1st, 2023 from LA County Fire Department. We do not live near a canyon or open space or near any un-irrigated vegetation. It is unclear if every home on the Palos Verdes Peninsula (Rancho Palos Verdes, Palos Verdes Estates, Rolling Hills and Rolling Hills Estates) received this notice or not. We are wondering if we received this notice due to the fire maps being updated? For many years all homes adjacent to canyons or open space received an annual clearance notice. We believe the proposed Zone 0 Ember resistant zone/defensible space change in requirements is being planned by CalFire but has not been implemented yet. We also understand that the revised plan and regulations are before a State Assembly Committee now reviewing its costs. We assume it will be implemented when it comes out of this committee, unless there is intervention. CalFire's website has no current information on the draft "draconian" plan, but the severe impacts affecting Rancho Palos Verdes will likely be implemented in 2024. We live in a tract home development and are at least one to two miles from any canyon areas. We have been told by the LA County Fire Department that the new rules (that aren't quite in place yet) will be very strict. Part of the problem is that our entire City and Peninsula has been crazily Jumped together into the most extreme fire hazard category as if we lived in a Forest area. Previously, the LA County Fire Department sensibly focused attention on those houses (i.e., near canyons) which were truly a risk; they have an excellent inventory of these houses and monitor them successfully every year. The Cal Fire Website on defensible space seems to be aiming at large properties, not properties like ours, but we believe that in 2024 this will no longer be the case. Implications as seen through the example of our personal situations We would be required to remove most of the mature plants and shrubs in our front yard and part of our side yard areas, although they pose no risk. We are particularly concerned about needing to remove numerous pygmy palm trees and sago palm trees that are within 5 feet of our home or garage. If they can't be within 5 feet of garage or home we would lose numerous trees that would be cost prohibitive to move (i.e., cranes required). Plus risking trees dying after transplanting. We keep the palms trimmed with no dead fronds year round and we understand that tree experts say that if dead fronds are removed, they do not pose a fire risk, so the regulations in our case seem unnecessary. 1 The fence line on one side of the house is about 6 feet from the structure. We have a mature beautiful hedge along the property fence line, which is carefully maintained. Next to the house is a cement block walkway and pebbles for about 3 or so feet. In order to have the hedge 5 feet from the structure would require cutting off almost all foliage and leaving the trunks exposed and a slight bit of green branches. Consequences for the Community The end result of these overly zealous proposed Zone O regulations, as applied to those homes NOT near canyons and unirrigated open space, will be: A. Devastating damage to the landscaping of our properties B. Elimination of most of the increasingly scarce habitats for butterflies and birds that they provide C. High expenses (including fines and involuntary escalations to property taxes) that can only be afforded readily by a minority of people, due to the high number of retired people in our community on fixed incomes (substantially eroded now due to high inflation). Gates and Fencing In addition to vegetation proposed regulations in Zone 0, the State Forestry board proposes to force removal of all combustible (wood and maybe vinyl) gates and fences within 5 feet of any structure. Fire Insurance availability and rate increases Additionally, we are very worried about being able to obtain fire insurance at our normal rates. This will be another very serious crisis for most residents. Key questions include: 1. Does this year's inspection and going forward cover every parcel in Rancho Palos Verdes or not? 2. Also, if only certain parcels were added to be inspected, why were they added and not others? 3. Are all residents' properties are affected for the 2023 inspection and for Zone O in 2024 and future years? 4. Is the new inspection fee of $100 for 2023, which is on 2024 tax bill and the $151 for 2024 on the 2025 property tax bill for every home and parcel in Rancho Palos Verdes? 5. Has the Assemblyman's office been informed on the status of the planned Zone O ember resistant vegetation plan and the impact on gates/fencing? 6. What does the current regulatory draft in Sacramento look like and how do we send comments to the Department of Forestry? 2 We sincerely ask your help on this issue. Thanks very much ! Jim Maclellan and Gwen Butterfield 3 .,.;""""-"~'= m ♦ "'% .• ~-~"",,,, Brush Clearance Annual Notice FAQs Residents of the Palos Verdes Peninsula have recently received a Defensible Space Annual Notice (formerly known as the Brush Clearance Annual Notice) from the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD). Some homeowners are receiving this notice for the first time. Consequently, the Peninsula Cities received a significant number of reports from residents who were confused or frustrated about their expectations for brush clearing this year. In partnership with the (LACoFD), the four cities of the Palos Verdes Peninsula are writing to provide residents with additional information regarding the current requirements for brush clearance. Why Did I Receive This Notice? -Your property is located within a Very High fire hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ) identified by The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). -California Public Resources Code 4291 requires single-family dwellings within the VHFHSZ to maintain defensible space at all times around these structures. -The LACoFD primarily conducts defensible space inspections on residential single-family dwellings; and will be focusing on single-family dwellings this year, then adding multifamily homes and condominiums next year. What Is a Fire Hazard Severity Zone? CAL FIRE is required by law to map significant fire hazard areas based on fuels, terrain, local weather, and other factors. -These designations, known as Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ), mandate how people construct buildings and protect property to reduce the risk of wildfires. -The Palos Verdes Peninsula is almost entirely designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). Why Is This the First Time I Am Receiving This Notice? -In the past two years, the LACoFD has integrated mapping technology into its Defensible Space Inspection Program using a geospatial database that is significantly more accurate than the visual identification that had been used previously. -Using this criteria-based mapping system, numerous uninspected parcels within the Palos Verdes Peninsula have been identified. These are the homeowners receiving the inspection notice for the very first time When Will My Property Be Inspected? -Your local fire station will begin inspections on June 1st, 2023. Is There a Fee For The Inspection? -Yes, In December of 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved an inspection fee $151.00 to be applied to your November Tax Bill. However, the fee will be phased in over 3 years (2021 - $50.00, 2022 -$100.00, and 2023 -$151.00). ,,<'""" "' ' ·0, 1c m • ~l\ffltittJO ,,,,.,,¾,~,-,,~,~-,.,.. Will I Receive a Report? -Yes, a report showing Compliance or Violation will be left hanging on your door. Do I Have to Be Home For The Inspection? -No, your local fire station will attempt to complete the inspection through only unlocked and open access. Will I Receive a Report Showing If My Property Is In Compliance? -Yes, all property owners will receive an inspection report showing either 'In Compliance' or the violations that need to be corrected. How much time will I have to make corrections? -Owners have a minimum of30 days to complete corrections. Can I Call Someone Ifl Need Clarity on Requirements? -Yes, prior to your inspection, please call the Brush Clearance Unit at (626) 969-2375. After your inspection, please call the phone number listed on your inspection report What Is Assembly Bill 38 (AB 38)? -Assembly Bill 38 (AB-38), commonly referred to as Real Estate Inspections, took effect on July 1, 2021. AB-38 requires, during escrow, that the seller of a property in the VHFHSZ submit documentation of a compliant defensible space inspection prior to closing. Homes that received their annual brush inspection within six months of closing can use that inspection, if compliant, to satisfy this requirement What Is Assembly Bill 3074 (AB 3074)? -State Assembly Bill 3074 (AB-3074) establishes Zone 0, which is a 5 foot Ember Resistant Zone that requires removal of all flammable materials within 5 feet of any structure. -Zone O requirements will not be enforced until 2024, the LACoFD will be using this year's inspections to educate property owners on what they need to do to become compliant with next year's Zone O requirements. Where Can I Get More Information? https://fire.lacounty.gov/fire-hazard-reduction-programs/ https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021 /05/Defensible-Space-booklet-2021 WEB.pdf -,https://openstates.org/ca/bills/20192020/ AB3074/ /~iLos .I & o m .. . ,(\ \"-.,,_,"'-"""·""' BRUSH CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS It is your legal responsibility to take the necessary action by clearing vegetation around all structures at risk. A fire safe landscape creates a defensible space to help protect against approaching wildfires. WHAT ARE YOUR RESPONSIBILITIES -Establish a 5-foot Ember Resistant Zone around all structures. Eliminate all vegetation and materials that could be ignited by embers from a wildfire. This is a new requirement imposed by the State of California via AB 3074. Enforcement of this requirement will begin in 2024. Informational only for 2023. -Removal of flammable vegetation within 50 feet of any structure. Native and ornamental vegetation known to be flammable, including but not limited to Acacia, Cedar, Cypress, Eucalyptus, Juniper, Pine, and Pampas Grass. ornamental grasses and ground cover should be maintained at no higher than 3 inches -Thin remaining vegetation for the next 150 feet ( or up to property line), for a total of 200 feet, around any structure by clearing, trimming, thinning, limbing up removing flammable vegetation and dead wood. • Specimen native trees and shrubs are permitted, provided they are spaced to not allow transmission of fire to a structure. • It is recommended that specimen shall be spaced a minimum of 15 feet or 3 times diameter from other specimens, structures or surrounding native brush. -Access road shall be maintained with a minimum of 10 feet of brush clearance on each side. Fire access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance to the sky. Trees overhanging fire access road shall be maintained to provide adequate vertical clearance. -Fire hydrants shall maintain clearance of 3 feet. -All trees and shrubs shall be maintained free of deadwood and litter. • Shrubs shall be trimmed up from the ground 1/3 of their height. • Trees shall be trimmed up to a minimum of 6 feet or 1/3 their height up to 40 feet. PREPARE FOR WILDFIRES: CREATE AND MAINTAIN A DEFENSIBLE SPACE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2023 SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA _____________________________________________________________________ Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agen da material received through Monday afternoon for the Tuesday, February 21, 2023, City Council meeting: Item No. Description of Material Non-Agenda Email from Brandee Keith F Landslide Surveys Results 1 Email exchanges between Senior Planner Seeraty and: Robin MacMorran; James Kurata Email from Glenn Cornell 2 Email exchanges between Senior Administrative Analyst Waters and Dana Graham Emails from: Rebecca Haeri; Alfred and Barbara Sattler; Michael Majid; H. Charles Foster; Trish and Don Lange Respectfully submitted, __________________ Teresa Takaoka L:\LATE CORRESPONDENCE\2023\20230221 additions revisions to agenda thru Monday.docx CITY OF v~ .p<) "' ~ RANCHO PALOS VERDES From: Sent: To: Brandee Keith < bkeith@aqmd.gov> Friday, February 17, 2023 4:39 PM CityClerk Subject: Submission of written comment for City Council Meeting 07-21-23 Good afternoon, I would like to submit an update from the South Coast AQMD for the public comment portion of next week's city council meeting. Unfortunately, the City Clerk's office is closed for the evening and our district will be closed on Monday, so I don't know if I'll have adequate time to call in and record a message prior to the meeting. I'm hoping submitting it in writing will suffice. Our update: Online applications are now being accepted for South Coast Air Quality Management District's 2023 Governing Board Summer Internship Program. If you know a college or high school student who might be interested in this wonderful opportunity, please direct them to the following link for additional information and so they may submit an online application. htt ps ://www .government jobs. com/ careers/ scaq md Regards, she/her Sr. Public Affairs Specialist, Geographic Outreach Team, South Bay Cities South Coast AQMD Office: 909.396.3952 Cell: 909.348.3752 PLEASE BE ADVISED SOUTH COAST AQMD IS CLOSED ON MONDAYS 1 Nol'\ r A-~{)\ Pul?\t c Cotvt~\--s Subject: Landslide Surveying From: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 11:55 AM Cc: wwynder@awattorneys.com; Elena Gerli <egerli@awattorneys.com>; Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>; Lincoln Lo <llo@rpvca.gov>; Ron Dragoo <RonD@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Subject: Landslide Surveying Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers, Tomorrow evening, you are being asked to consider extending the contract with McGee Surveying until the City and its project manager, Hout Construction Services, has completed its assessment of the most optimal method and frequency of monitoring. McGee Surveying uses GPS data, and the survey results through 2021 can be found on the City's website at the following link: Landslide Surveys / Rancho Palos Verdes, CA -Official Website (rpvca.gov) https://www.rpvca.gov/1426/Landslide-Surveys Let me know if you have any follow-up questions. Ara Ara Michael Mihranian City Manager ara m@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5202 Address: 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 902 75 Website: www.rpvca.g.Qy ► ~lePlay 1 F Subject: FW: Late Corr Attachments: Memo Style-2-14-23 Robin Email and City Response2.pdf From: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 12:16 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Cc: Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov> Subject: Late Corr Actually, the email I sent to the neighbor had a larger attachment. Please see the attached PDF of the email below that was sent to the neighbor, with the full attachments. Amy Seeraty Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov D WNLOAD 'hi~ ~ GUITON r, Google Play e·:nail message contains i11fonml:ion belo11CJin9 to U10 Cily of Rancho Palos Verdes, wr:ich may bo privileqod, conficie11t;al cind/or pro,octecl frorn ,:i,;closur·o. The information is intenclocl only fm use of the incliviciual or entity ncnncd. Unauthorized dissorninc>tion, disti•il!ul:ion, m copyinq is st:"ictly prnhibitrxL If you reccivc•cl this email in error, or· arc not a11 intcnclccl recipient, pk,asc notify the sender irnrnccliately. Th,mk you for your assistance ancl coopor·ation. From: Amy Seeraty Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 10:07 AM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov> Cc: Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov> Subject: FW: Here are questions posed by residents in our area Late correspondence, thank you. Amy Seeraty Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5231 " . DOWNLOAD 'hi~ 1 /. City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov ~ C..tTITON p-Google Play !his e-mail rnessacJc contains information belonqing to the City of Rancho Palos Vc:rdcs, which may be privilc(Jcd, conficlential and/or rxot:cctcd frcm1 disclosure, The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named, UnauU1ori1.ed dissemination, distribution, or copyinCJ is strictly pror1ihitccL If you ,-cccivcd this email in error, or arc not an intended 1-c'cipicnt, please notify the sender irnrncdiatcly, Thank you for your c1ssist,HKC' c1nd coopc'ration, From: Amy Seeraty Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 9:48 AM To: Robin MacMorran <robinmacm@gmail.com> Cc: Glenn Cornell <gcornell6@gmail.com>; Jock MacMorran <jockmacm@gmail.com>; Jerry Becker <jerry.becker@cox.net>; Jane Gualeni <janegualeni@gmail.com>; Lois Tregarten <nanatre@cox.net>; Eric Alegria <Eric.Alegria@rpvca.gov>; Chris Martin <chris martin@ahm.honda.com>; Lisa Scotto <lisascotto@pacbell.net>; Janice Perez <perez99@aol.com> Subject: RE: Here are questions posed by residents in our area Hello Robin- Thank you for your email and I appreciate your concern for your neighborhood. Please note that Green Hills actually replaced their equipment with new equipment in 2022. The attached information about the new equipment (model A-250) is also available on the American Crematory Equipment Co. website. Please click here to view the City Council Agenda and scroll down to Public Hearing item No. 1 to view the staff report and attachments for the February 21st City Council meeting. Please let me know if you have any additional questions, thank you. Amy Seeraty Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov DOWNLOA 'ltt.1r ~ c,nrroo ~·-Google Play r his '-' mail message contains information belo119in9 to the City of Rancho f'alos Verdes, which may be p1·ivilcgcd, conficiontal and/or protected from cHsclosun;, Tho infonm1tion is intended oniy fo1-use of the individual or entity rnrnocL Unauthorized cli,;sernination, cbtribution, or copylnfJ is strictly proi:ilJitccL If you received this crna\! 1n C!Tor, or arc not an intended recipient, please notify the sender irnrn0diatcly. Thank you for· your assistance t)nd cooperation, From: Robin MacMorran <robinmacm@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 5:35 PM To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Cc: Glenn Cornell <gcornell6@gmail.com>; Jock MacMorran <jockmacm@gmail.com>; Jerry Becker <jerry.becker@cox.net>; Jane Gualeni <janegualeni@gmail.com>; Lois Tregarten <nanatre@cox.net>; Eric Alegria <Eric.Alegria@rpvca.gov>; Chris Martin <chris martin@ahm.honda.com>; Lisa Scotto <lisascotto@pacbell.net>; Janice Perez <perez99@aol.com> Subject: Re: Here are questions posed by residents in our area 2 Are they buying new equipment or using the old? If they are buying new, what type is it? I know water cremation equipment is more expensive, but it does not pollute the environment as much as gas cremation does. Mayo Clinic and Ucla use this method. I am 80 years old and we will be cremated probably at Green Hills. It is my neighborhood that I care about. On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:36 PM Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> wrote: Hello Robin- Thank you for your email. It is my understanding that the actual cremation facilities are not being proposed to expand at this time, and the existing cremation facilities in the Administration Building would just be moved to the new building. You may wish to note that the State also licenses and regulates crematoriums, in addition to the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Also, just from a quick search of the crematories in Los Angeles County on the State Department of Consumer Affairs Cemetery and Funeral Bureau website, it appears that crematoriums commonly operate in cemeteries, which are often located adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Sincerely, Amy Seeraty DOWNLOAD Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov 'hl{f Phone -(310) 544-5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes ~ G.UtTON ,,-, Google Play 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov INs o rnail message contains inforrnation belon9inq to tho City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which rnay be privilogccl, conficlontial and/or protected frorn cbclrx;ure. The inforrnation is i11tondoci only for use of the individual or entity named. Un,1uthorizcd diss(:mination, distribution, or copyi119 is stnctiy prohibited. you received this eir121l! 1n error, or are not· a11 intended rec1pic~nt, please: notify the srnder iir1rnediat:e!y. "fhank you for your assistance and cooperation. 3 From: Robin MacMorran <robinmacm@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 8:02 PM To: Glenn Cornell <gcornell6@gmail.com>; Jock MacMorran <jockmacm@gmail.com>; Jerry Becker <jerry.becker@cox.net>; Jane Gualeni <janegualeni@gmail.com>; Lois Tregarten <nanatre@cox.net>; Eric Alegria <Eric.Alegria@rpvca.gov>; Chris Martin <chris martin@ahm.honda.com>; Lisa Scotto <lisascotto@pacbell.net>; Janice Perez <perez99@aol.com>; Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Subject: Here are questions posed by residents in our area It is 2023. We know far more about fossil fuel emissions than when GHs first received permission to build and operate the current crematorium. More and more communities are banning the use of fireplaces, gasoline-powered lawnmowers, etc. Why would RPV want a facility that is vastly bigger and will be used far more frequently to continue to operate here? Though burning natural gas does not produce as many harmful emissions as other fossil fuels, it's still far from clean. As you may have read, this fact is causing increasing concerns. So much so that we will likely see gas appliances banned from new housing by the end of this decade. So why would our city elect to give its OK to a large gas-fired unit that will almost certainly continue to operate in our midst for many more years to come? Isn't it more reasonable to site operations such as this in other parts of SoCal which are less developed and are zoned for industrial-type uses? Where else in LA County is such a large unit allowed to operate so close to peoples' homes? Robin MacMorran 4242247500 Robin MacMorran 4242247500 4 Amy Seeraty From: Sent: To: Amy Seeraty Wednesday, February 15, 2023 9:48 AM Robin MacMorran Cc: Glenn Cornell; Jock MacMorran; Jerry Becker; Jane Gualeni; Lois Tregarten; Eric Alegria; Chris Martin; Lisa Scotto; Janice Perez Subject: Attachments: RE: Here are questions posed by residents in our area A-250 Plan View.pdf; ACE-2019-Catalog_Higher-Quality.pdf Hello Robin- Thank you for your email and I appreciate your concern for your neighborhood. Please note that Green Hills actually replaced their equipment with new equipment in 2022. The attached information about the new equipment (model A-250) is also available on the American Crematory Equipment Co. website. Please click here to view the City Council Agenda and scroll down to Public Hearing item No. 1 to view the staff report and attachments for the February 21st City Council meeting. Please let me know if you have any additional questions, thank you. Amy Seeraty Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov DOWNLOAD 'tit~ ..... (l.l;tHOO If'' Googlle Play lhb e 1,1a,i rne';saqe contains infonnat.ion bclonqinq to tlw City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privilcrJeci, confidential ancl/or protected from disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity namecl. Unauthorized dissemination, disl:hbution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you received thii, email in error, or ,ire not an intended recipient, plctisc notify the scndc1· immediately. Thank you for yow assi•,t<1nce and cooperation. From: Robin MacMorran <robinmacm@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 5:35 PM To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Cc: Glenn Cornell <gcornell6@gmail.com>; Jock MacMorran <jockmacm@gmail.com>; Jerry Becker <jerry.becker@cox.net>; Jane Gualeni <janegualeni@gmail.com>; Lois Tregarten <nanatre@cox.net>; Eric Alegria <Eric.Alegria@rpvca.gov>; Chris Martin <chris_martin@ahm.honda.com>; Lisa Scotto <lisascotto@pacbell.net>; Janice Perez <perez99@aol.com> Subject: Re: Here are questions posed by residents in our area Are they buying new equipment or using the old? If they are buying new, what type is it? I know water cremation equipment is more expensive, but it does not pollute the environment as much as gas cremation does. Mayo Clinic and Ucla use this method. I am 80 years old and we will be cremated probably at Green Hills. It is my neighborhood that I care about. On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:36 PM Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> wrote: Hello Robin- Thank you for your email. It is my understanding that the actual cremation facilities are not being proposed to expand at this time, and the existing cremation facilities in the Administration Building would just be moved to the new building. You may wish to note that the State also licenses and regulates crematoriums, in addition to the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Also, just from a quick search of the crematories in Los Angeles County on the State Department of Consumer Affairs Cemetery and Funeral Bureau website, it appears that crematoriums commonly operate in cemeteries, which are often located adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Sincerely, Amy Seeraty DOWN OAD Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov 11t.:r Phone -(310) 544-5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes • • • • • ► ~lePlay 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov This email nwssdge contains information helongin\J to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which rnay be privileged, conficlontial and/or protected frnrn disclosure, Tho information is intcnd,'d only for use of tho individual or entity namccl, Unauthor·i7.,id dissemination, distribution, or copyinq is strict!y prohibitccl, If you received this email in error, or ar-e not an int.ended recipient, plea,;c notify the sender irnrncdidtcly, Thank you for your assistance and cooperation, From: Robin MacMorran <robinmacm@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 8:02 PM To: Glenn Cornell <gcornell6@gmail.com>; Jock MacMorran <jockmacm@gmail.com>; Jerry Becker <jerry.becker@cox.net>; Jane Gualeni <janegualeni@gmail.com>; Lois Tregarten <nanatre@cox.net>; Eric Alegria 2 <Eric.Alegria@rpvca.gov>; Chris Martin <chris martin@ahm.honda.com>; Lisa Scotto <lisascotto@pacbell.net>; Janice Perez <perez99@aol.com>; Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Subject: Here are questions posed by residents in our area It is 2023. We know far more about fossil fuel emissions than when GHs first received permission to build and operate the current crematorium. More and more communities are banning the use of fireplaces, gasoline-powered lawnmowers, etc. Why would RPV want a facility that is vastly bigger and will be used far more frequently to continue to operate here? Though burning natural gas does not produce as many harmful emissions as other fossil fuels, it's still far from clean. As you may have read, this fact is causing increasing concerns. So much so that we will likely see gas appliances banned from new housing by the end of this decade. So why would our city elect to give its OK to a large gas-fired unit that will almost certainly continue to operate in our midst for many more years to come? Isn't it more reasonable to site operations such as this in other parts of SoCal which are less developed and are zoned for industrial-type uses? Where else in LA County is such a large unit allowed to operate so close to peoples' homes? Robin MacMorran 4242247500 Robin MacMorran 4242247500 3 SAFETY D STOPS ~ ACCESS PANEL ANCHOR LUG (4)TOTAL FRONT ELEVATION .... REAR ELEVATION DOOR HOOD IS BLEFOR .TION ~ ITROL 'ANEL TROL INETCAN IOUNTED GHTOR SIDE. REMOTE 2'-0" CREMATION BURNER ST ACK SYSTEM QUICK DISCONNECT OPTIONAL 13'-2" 15'-6" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 36" MIN. REAR 22" CLEARANCE ~, LOADING DOOR CREMATION BURNER GA.5 CONNECTION 20" 27" STACK SYSTEM :L AFTERBURNER MA,NELECTR,CAL~ CONNECTIONS BOX ----0 48" MIN. SIDE CLEARANCE ON SIDE OF UNIT WITH CONTROL CABINET 15'-8" PLAN VIEW COMBUSTION BLOWER AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIPMENT 9828 ARLEE AVENUE, SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90620 MODEL# A-250-HW PAGE 1 -PLAN VIEW & ELEVATIONS SCALE: N.T.S. DATE: 03/15/11 The American Advantage American Crematory Equipment Company is considered the premier manufacturing, service, and repair company in North America and beyond. We have been Manufacturing with Pride™ since our incorporation in 1974. We manufacture, service, and repair with the highest standards and integrity in the industry. It is with our Manufacturing with Pride™ commitment that we at American Crematory can bring you, our customers, the latest in technology. Our State-of-the-art Operating Platforms and innovative design and engineering insure you receive the most dependable, reliable, environmentally conscious, cost-effective, and longest I asting equipment with the best warranty on the market today. Our Philosophy "Service is Everything" mis simple; always put the customer needs first, have integrity in every aspect of customer service, and be reliable. Our entire team pride themselves on listening to what the customers' needs are and being committed to complete success. Everyone at American Crematory Equipment Company practices Service Is Everything™ and it is what sets us apart from the competition. Dear Crematory Owner/Manager, American Crematory Equipment Company would like to acknowledge you and introduce you to our products and services. American Crematory Manufactures with Pride™ an extensive line of human and pet cremation equipment. Our equipment has been engineered and developed using our vast knowledge and experience in the cremation industry starting as early as the 1960's. From conception to completion the cremation equipment you purchase from American Crematory is designed with the utmost integrity. We pride ourselves on enduring strength, high-quality materials, superior craftsmanship, and intelligent engineering. We Manufacture with Pride™ a wide range of models to suit every client's specific needs. Whether it's an entry-level model with electromechanical (manual) controls or our top-of-the-line, fully-automated, self-monitored oxygen & fuel controlled "ARIES" model designed for high volume continuous production, we have what you need. Our equipment is attractive, functional, efficient, and considered to be one of the best on the market today. American Crematory provides various options from simply suppling equipment, to turn-key solutions and installation options, where we handle the entire process of permit, to installation, and start-up. Our team is one of the most knowledgeable in the industry with over 75 years of combined knowledge and experience. We will work with you through every step of design, production, installation, start-up, and training of your new cremation equipment. After the installation we will be available to you 24/7. Our equipment is Manufactured with Pride™ to include UL listing and NFPA Standards for safety. Our equipment can be installed in a dedicated building or installed as an internal part of your facility. American Crematory.considers your new equipment purchase an investment on both our parts and we stake our reputation on each and every model and product we produce. In closing, doing business with American Crematory Equipment Company assures you the highest quality.of !Jl'anufacturing, workmanship, technology, and customer service in the industry. Please feel free to call us at any time with any questfons you may have. We look forward to working with you and providing you with the Service is Everything™ philosophy for all of your cremation needs. · · We wish to thank all of our continued clients for their loyalty and placing their trust in our team. Sincerely Appreciated, AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIPMENT COMPANY Manufacturing with Table of Contents Cremation Equipment: Human Cremation Equipment: Pet 4-8 American Crematory Operating Systems Guardian D.A.S. System 9 -15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ACE Controls & Equipment Operator Training & Certification Programs Service Repairs AC-1 Cremator Charger Hydraulic Lift Tables Electric Cremated Remains Processors Storage & Cooling Racks 24,25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Coolers & Custom Rack Systems Refractory Lined & Stainless Steel Stack Options Containers, Discs, & Rollers Cremation Tools Ash & Transfer Pans Spare Parts Safety Equipment Index Contact Information Corporate Headquarters 14530 Anson Avenue Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Toll Free (800) 396-2254 Phone (562) 926-2876 Fax (562) 926-2880 Visit us online at www.AmericanCrematory.com We Accept Mike Burwell 32,33 34 -37 38 CEO mike@americancrematory.com John Raggett Vice President john@americancrematory.com Britnie Moniz Western Division Sales britnie@americancrematory.com Supplies orders@americancrematory.com Accounting admin@americancrematory.com II "Like" Us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/americancrematory [o·]J~~~ www.instagram.com/americancrematoryequipmentco/ VouTube ►Search American Crematory Copyright© 2019 American Crematory Equipment Company. All rights reserved. 3 A-375-S5 Specifications Height 9'8" (2.95m) Length 14'3" (4.34m) Width 9'0" (2.74m) Door Width 45" (1.14m) Weight 42,000 Lbs. (19,051 kg) Installation Clearance Required 8' min. (2.44m) Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240/480 1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) Maximum Fuel Rating 3 MM BTU/HR Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Available Human Cremation Equipment Model A-375-S5 "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment The A-375-SS is our Super Duty Cremator. It features a super large primary chamber and a uniquely designed multi-faceted secondary chamber. The A-375 has a chamber capacity of 1200 lbs. The average cremation time is approx- imately 70 minutes or less and can perform back to back cremations with no cool down between cremations. This is our most advanced, fully automated model manufactured. (2.95m) Control Systems Available: • ACS-1 PLC & Touchscreen • American Instant Access • ARIES Operating System • Guardian D.A.S. 4 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Human Cremation Equipment Model A-350 "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment The American A-350 is designed for facilities with high volume and production requirements. It implements the Trilogy Combustion System, the most advanced flame safety control in the industry (made by Siemens). The multi-chamber design allows for rapid cremation time of approximately 100 minutes or less. The A-350 also has the advantage of many design options to accommodate your specific installation needs. Unique design features available on the A-350 include automatic monitoring combustion control (ensuring maximum efficiency) oversized loading door and the Vortex exhaust stream opacity control system. The A-350 also incorporates a unique ash pancooling system featuring integrated air jets to reduce the cremated remains cool down time prior to processing. Control Systems Available: • American Standard • ACS-1 PLC & Touchscreen • American Instant Access • ARIES Operating System • Guardian D.A.S. 2" FIP GAS CONNECTION ;--------+-3' MIN REAR CLEARANCE (4) LIFTING LUGS TOTAL CREMATION BURNER SECONDA~IN CHAMBER D BURNER (OPTIONAL) 21" INSIDE DIAMETER STACK [Q] AFTERBURNER 1·-11· 4' MIN CLEARANCE ON SIDE OF UNIT WITH CONTROL CABINET j RECOMMENDED r ,. -,·.~ ~ 1-2-2·511!' _ A-350 Specifications Height 9'5" (2.74m) Length 12'5" (3.78m); 14'6" (4.42m) with Blower Width 8'0" (2.44m); 9'0" (2.74m) with Panel Door Width 45" (1.14m) Weight 38,000 Lbs. (17,237 kg) Installation Clearance Required 8' min. (2.44m) Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240/480 1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) Maximum Fuel Rating 2.5 MM BTU/HR @2380 CFH Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Available www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396~2254 5 :}fJJ1:"c -. , . ~ .. • ·) ·· meruav ~;_ . CREMATORY EQUIPMENT CO. ,, 1 (3.10 A-300 Specifications Height 9'4" (2.84m) Length 10'2" (3.10m); 12'6" (3.81m) with Blower Width 7'0" (2.13m); 8'0" (2.44m) with Panel Weight 32,000 Lbs. (14,515 kg) Installation Clearance Required 8' min. (2.44m) Fuel Rating Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240/480 1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) Maximum Fuel Rating 2.5 MM BTU/HR @2380 CFH Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Avflilable Human Cremation Equipment Model A-300 "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment The A-300 is built for volume and production with an average cremation time of 90 minutes or less. It implements the Trilogy Combustion System, the most advanced flame safety control in the industry (made by Siemens). The Trilogy System's remote display provides pinpoint diagnostic information, making troubleshooting immediate and accurate. 9'4" The A-300 is a very versatile crematory in our product line. (2.84m) The A-300 has the ability to accommodate a variety of operating and installation configurations. The A-300 is a multi-chamber cremator designed to cremate oversized cases and hardwood caskets. The A-300 also incorporates a unique ash pan cooling system featuring integrated air jets to reduce the cremated remains cool down time prior to processing. Minimize Downtime With the American "Trilogy" Combustion Control System (shown here) you get the advantage of increased fuel efficiency, advanced monitoring and diagnostic capabilities. The "Trilogy" system allows for immediate and accurate troubleshooting, decreasing and/or eliminating costly down time. American Crematory Equipment Company is proud to offer a wide range of operating systems and technology to meet every customer's needs. (4) LIFTING LUGS TOTAL 2" FIP GAS CONNECTION ±f---+3'M!NREM CLEARANCE I --1' --.... RECOMMENDED __ ,. MAI ELECTRICAL CONNECTION BOX 21" INSIDE DIAMETER STACK [Q] -!- AFTERBURNER 1·-1 r 4' MIN CLEARANCE ON SIDE OF UNIT WITH CONTROL CABINET l PLAN VIEW -1'-9" - 2·-r CREMATION BURNER 6 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Human Cremation Equipment Model A-250 "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment The American A-250 has become one of the most popular models in our product line. It features a large capacity primary chamber and a 45" loading door opening. With the addition of our proprietary operating systems you can rest assured you will be operating one of the most efficient machines available. The A-250 allows first time buyers room for growth as their business increases. Control Systems Available: • American Standard • ACS-1 PLC & Touchscreen • American Instant Access • ARIES Operating System • Guardian D.A.S. Customizable Finishes Available for Each & Every Model Stainless Steel Pattern A 1 Stainless Steel Brushed A2 Stainless Steel Pattern A3 CONTROL PANEL Stainless Steel Pattern A4 48" MIN. SIDE CLEARANCE ON SIDE OF UNIT WITH CONTROL CABINET 22" GAS CONNECTION 20" AFTERBURNER MAIN ELECTRICAL~ CONNECTIONS BOX -----u 13'-4" 15'-6" PLAN VIEW 8'4" (2.5m) 36" MIN. REAR CLEARANCE COMBUSTION BLOWER A-250 Specifications Height 8'4" (2.5ml Length 15'8" (4.57m) with Blower Width 5'1 O" (1.78m); 6'9" (2.06m) with Panel Door Width 45" (1.14m) Weight 28,000 Lbs. (12,700 kg) Installation Clearance Required 8' min. (2.44ml Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240/480 1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) Maximum Fuel Rating 2.25 MM BTU/HR @220 CFH Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Availtible www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396~2254 7 ~ Removable Door Hood i for Installation Needs ;~ Human Cremation Equipment Model A-200 "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment The American A-200 Model is our entry level cremator. With an average cremation time of approximately 120 minutes or less, the A-200 can easily perform 4 cases per 8-10-hour day. The primary feature on the A-200 is "Throat Air" and "Hearth Air" Control. Throat Air allows the operator the ability to effectively control and eliminate stack emissions. Hearth Air allows the operator full control of the primary chamber over fire air which effectively decreases cremation times. Additionally the combustion process is cycled and monitored by automatic temperature and timer controls which ensure fuel efficiency. 14'8"~ Minimize Downtime With the American "Trilogy" Combustion Control System (shown here) you get the advantage of increased fuel efficiency, advanced monitoring and diagnostic capabilities. ~5'4" (1.63m) • · •· . ~ (4.4lm) ~6'3"(1.82~ ~ with panel ------.._ A-200 Specifications Height 8'4" (2.5m) Length 14'8" with blower (4.47m) Width 5'4" (1.63ml; 6'3" with Panel (1.82ml Door Width 40" (1.02ml Weight 23,000 Lbs. (10,433 kg) Installation Clearance Required 8' min. (2.44ml Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240/480 1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) Maximum Fuel Rating 1.75 MM BTU/HR@ 1666 CFH Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Available CONTROL PANEL The "Trilogy" system allows for immediate and accurate troubleshooting, decreasing and/or eliminating costly down time. American Crematory Equipment Company is proud to offer a wide range of operating systems and technology to meet every customer's needs. CREMATION BURNER 48" MIN. SIDE CLEARANCE ON SIDE OFUNITWJTH CONTROL CABINET GAS CONNECTION _1_•·-1 20" AFTERBURNER MAIN ELECTRICAL~ CONNECTIONS BOX ----u 12'-4" 14'-8" PLAN VIEW 36" MIN. REAR CLEARANCE COMBUSTION BLOWER 8 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Pet Cremation Equipment Multi-Chambered "Hot Hearth" Pet Cremation Equipment Our Multi-Chamber pet equipment is amongst the finest built Pet Cremation Equipment on the market today. These units can be configured to meet your individual business needs, ranging from a single chamber up to a 10-chambered unit. Each chamber is operated independently and can accommodate 150+ lb. animal. These types of units allow you to grow your pet business with the advantage of having private cremations in each individual chamber, providing peace of mind for your customers. A-400P-8 Our A-400P-8 pictured here has 4 chambers on each side. Chamber sizes range from 30" to 58" wide. Our UL Panel Division has engineered and built some of the best control systems on the market today. Customers can choose from a Manually Controlled System or a state of the art Siemens PLC System. Additional Models We manufacture our Pet Cremation units in a variety of styles and chamber configurations to help meet the needs of a wide variety of facilities, including: • Single Side Loading Chambers • A-250-P-5: 5 Chambers • A-250-P Double: 2 Chambers • A-250-P-6: 6 Chambers • A-250-P-3: 3 Chambers • A-250-P-8: 8 Chambers • A-250-P Quad: 4 Chambers A-400P-8 Specifications Height 9'6" (2.895m) Length 22'10.5" (6.97m) Width 8'5" with panel (2.56m) Weight 64,000 Lbs. (29,029 kg) Installation Clearance Required 10'3" min (3.12ml Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240V/50Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) 60 AMP Minimum Requirement Maximum Fuel Rating 6.0MM BTU/HR Panel Front or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Fi11a11ce Options Available www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 g A-250P-5 Specifications Height 8'6" (2.59m) Length 17'0" (5.18m) Width 7'8" (2.34m); 8'8" with panel (2.64m) Door Width 40" (1.02m) .._40"- (1.02m) Afterchamber Loading Opening 4@ 29" x 36"; 1 @ 39" x 48" Weight 38,000 Lbs. (17,237 kg) Installation Clearance Required 9' min (2.7m); 1 O' (3.05m) Recommended Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 2 40V/50Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) 60 AMP Minimum Requirement Maximum Fuel Rating 4.0 MM BTU/HR @ 3786 CFH Panel Warranty Right, Left or Remote 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Available Pet Cremation Equipment l♦Wf0, Model A-250P-5 "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment 8'6" (2.59m) l The American A-250P-5 is Ideal for High-Volume facilities that desire completely private cremations while processing multiple pets at the same time. Our Multi-Chamber units are truly independently operated chambers. The A-250P-5 has one large chamber in the front and two medium chambers on each side. Each chamber has independent combustion control allowing for the operation of a single chamber or any combination of all five chambers. The A-250P-5 will allow your business to achieve a level of service to your clients that is unparalleled. All of the American models come standard with independent hydraulic loading doors, no counterweight or" cooler" style loading doors. Multi-Chamber units can be wrapped for a very appealing visual experience for your die nts while witnessing of private cremations. Remains Removal Cart The animal remains removal cart is of a steel frame construction, finished with a powder coated surface. The large work space allows for easy access to sort through remains. 1 O 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 w z t Manufacturing with Pride Pet Cremation Equipment Model A-250P-Quad "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment American Crematory is proud to introduce the A-250P-Quad. The "Quad" was the first animal crematory with four individual cremation chambers. Each chamber is equipped with its own combustion system which allows each chamber to operate independently of the others. Built on the "Trilogy" platform the A-250P-Quad has the latest in combustion control technology, providing greater efficiency and productivity. With four individual cremation chambers and four individual hydraulic loading doors the Quad is ideal for individual/private cremation and is extremely witness friendly. The animal remains removal cart is of a steel frame construction, finished with a powder coated surface. The large work space allows for easy access to sort through remains. 1 (4.Sm The Original Independently Operated Multi-Chamber Pet Crematory CREMATION BURNERS LOADING DOOR r7_ MAIN ELECTRICAL LJ------------CONNECTIONS BOX LOADING DOOR PLAN VIEW AFTERBURNER~ LOADING DOOR 48" MIN. SIDE CLEARANCE 15'-10" 48" 36" MIN. REAR (CLEARANCE A-250P-Quad Specifications Height 8'4" (2.Sm) Length 15'1 O" (4.5m) Width 7'6" (2.13m) Weight 30,000 Lbs. (13,607 kg) Installation Clearance Required 8' min. (2.44m) Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240V/50Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) Maximum Fuel Rating 3.5 MM BTU/HR @ 3333 CFH Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Available www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800} 396-2254 11 A-200P-3 Specifications Height 8'4" (2.54m} Length 14'8" (4.47m} Width 7'2" (2.19m} Weight 30,000 Lbs. (13,608 kg} Installation Clearance Required 9' min (2.7m} Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally} 240V/50Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally} 60 AMP Minimum Requirement Maximum Fuel Rating 2.5MM BTU/HR Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Available > .47m} Pet Cremation Equipment Model A-200P-3 f@)(Q( "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment The American A-200P-3 is ideal for facilities that want completely private cremations while processing multiple pets at the same time. Our Multi-Chamber units are configured to meet your specific needs. The "Triple", as it is commonly referred to, has one large chamber in the front and two smaller chambers, one on each side. Each chamber is independently operated. The multi-chamber units give your business an advantage over the competition. All of the American models come standard with independent hydraulic loading doors, no counterweight or "cooler" style loading doors. Multi-Chamber units can be wrapped for a very appealing visual experience for your clients while witnessing of private cremations. Customers can choose from an electromechanical control system or PLC based control system with Touchscreen. Example of Multi-Chamber Pet Unit PLC Graphics 48" GAS CONNECTION 36" MIN. REAr~ f------f---------'------~t------+-----i----t-----scl-c:ClEARANCE LOADING DOOR _ CREMATION BURNERS CONTROL PANEL PlAN VIEW LOADING DOOR 48" MIN. SIDE CLEARANCE 14'-8" 12 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Pet Cremation Equipment Model A-SOOP Equine/ Batch "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment The A-SOOP is built for high volume and production of Segregated, Communal and Large Equine Animals. The A-SOOP has the largest hearth capacity and loading door opening in its class, making the insertion of large equine animals simple and dignified. All of the features on the A-SOOP are designed to insure efficient and reliable operation.The A-SOOP comes standard with the Trilogy Combustion Control System insuring pinpoint diagnostics making troubleshooting immediate and accurate. The multi-chamber design and fuel/oxygen control system provides maximum efficiency, complete combustion and rapid cremation times. CONTROL PANEL CREMATION BURNERS 48" MIN. S1DE CLEARANCE ON SIDE OF UNIT WITH CONTROL CABINET 29" STACK SYSTEM 14'-2" 16'-10" PLAN VIEW 10'10" (3.05mh COMBUSTION BLOWER A-SOOP Equine/ Batch Specifications Height 10'1 O" (3.05m) Length 18'1 O" (5.5m) Width 8'0" (2.44m); 9'0" with panel (2.7m) Door Width 6'0" (1.88m) Weight 64,000 Lbs. (29,030 kg) Installation Clearance Required 9' min (2.7m) Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240V/50Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) 60 AMP Minimum Requirement Maximum Fuel Rating 3.5 MM BTU/HR with 2 Primary Burners 5.0 MM BTU/HR with 4 Primary Burners Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Available www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot line (800) 396-2254 13 . . . ~) mmcav ~~.- CREMATORY EQUIPMENT CO. Jt 8'4" (2.5m) A-250WH·P Specifications Height 8'4" (2.5m) Length 15'8" (4.57m) with Blower Width 5'1 O" (1.78m); 6'9" (2.06m) with Panel Door Width 45" (1.14m) Weight 28,000 Lbs. (12,700 kg) Installation Clearance Required 8' min. (2.44m) Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240V/50Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) Maximum Fuel Rating 2.50MM BTU/HR Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Available , ~ ~ Pet Cremation Equipment Model A-250WH-P "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment The A-250WH-P Pet Cremation System features a larger capacity loading chamber for communal and/or small batch loads. The A-250WH-P is equipped with a secondary cremation chamber burner to insure rapid cremation times and effective cremation of segregated animals. All of the features on the A-250WH-P are designed to insure efficient and reliable operation. The A-250WH-P comes standard with the Trilogy Combustion Control System insuring pinpoint diagnostics making troubleshooting immediate and accurate. The fuel/oxygen control system provides maximum efficiency and complete combustion of emissions. "Throat Air Control" &"Hearth Air Control" allows the operator the ability to effectively control the cremation process and decrease cremation times. Minimize Downtime With the American "Trilogy" Combustion Control System (shown here) you get the advantage of increased fuel efficiency, advanced monitoring and diagnostic capabilities. The "Trilogy" system allows for immediate and accurate troubleshooting, decreasing and/or eliminating costly down time. American Crematory Equipment Company is proud to offer a wide range of operating systems and technology to meet every customer's needs. 36" MIN. REAR GAS CONNECTION ~22_·· _ 1 CLEARANCE BURNER ~---+-~-C-RE-MA-TIO-N--~-----,-o••l----1--~ CONTROL PANEL 48" MIN. SIDE CLEARANCE ON SIDE OF UNJTWITH CONTROL CABINET AFTERBURNER MAIN ELECTRICAL~ CONNECTIONS BOX LJ 13'-4" 15'-8" PLAN VIEW COMBUSTION BLOWER 14 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Pet Cremation Equipment Model A-200P-HT "Hot Hearth" Cremation Equipment The A200P-HT is the premier cremator for animal aftercare, veterinarians, humane societies and pet cemeteries. This model pet cremator is ideal for entry level, expansion or upgrading to meet your specific needs. The A-200P-HT offers best in class efficiency and the flexibility to perform individual, communal or small to medium batch cremations. The primary feature on the A-200P-HT is "Throat Air" and "Hearth Air" Control. Throat Air allows the operator the ability to effectively control and eliminate stack emissions. Hearth Air allows the operator full control of the primary chamber over fire air which effectively decreases cremation times. Additionally the combustion process is cycled and monitored by automatic temperature and timer controls which ensure fuel efficiency. A-150-P Also Available The A-150-P Pet Cremation System is our entry level pet cremation system designed for individual cremations of small to medium animals. The A-150-P provides the best value, performance and efficiency in its class. For A-150-P specifications and more details please call (800) 396-2254. 8'4" (2.5m). 36" MIN. REAR 19" CLEARANCE CONTROL PANEL 48" MIN. SIDE CLEARANCE ON SIDE OF UNIT WITH CONTROL CABINET AFTERBURNER MAIN ELECTRICAL~ CONNECTIONS BOX LJ 12'-4" 14'-8" PLAN VIEW _,. · · Removable Door Hood · .. · • for Installation Needs l '~ A-200P·HT Specifications Height 8'4" (2.5m) Length 14'8" with blower (4.47m) Width 5'4" (1.63m); 6'3" with Panel (1.82m) Door Width 40" (1.02m) Weight 23,000 Lbs. (10,433 kg) Installation Clearance Required 8' min. (2.44m) Fuel Natural Gas, Propane, Butane, Can be Modified to Accept Diesel Oil Electrical 220V/60Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Nationally) 240V/50Hz/1 Phase or 3 Phase (Internationally) Maximum Fuel Rating 1.75MM BTU/HR Panel Right, Left or Remote Warranty 2 year "Best in Class" Available in a wide range of colors allowing you or our team to design a comforting setting for your customers. Lease & Finance Options Available www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 15 American Crematory Operating Systems All of the American Combustion Systems (except the AE models) come standard with our "TRILOGY" operating platform. The TRILOGY system is a Siemens-based platform that includes Siemens flame safeguards, remote display and resets, motor starters, relays contacts, actuators and butterfly valves. This system is engineered to outperform the competition and provide our customers with piece-of-mind. Our engineering and product implementation is how we can give a 2 & 3-year component warranty. American Crematory has the best warranty in the industry. Options for our operating and control systems are as follows. ,,--_-,',',-----. -._ II '~;,/ ,/:,'>-_,, </ ~0 II American Standard This is our original operating system. It is an electromechanical or "EM" system. It includes the "Trilogy" combustion control system. The EM electromechanical (manual) control requires the operator to control the entire cremation process. The primary feature on the EM system is the "Throat Air" and "Hearth Air" Control. Throat Air Control allows the operator to effectively eliminate stack emissions. Hearth Air Control allows the operator to control the primary chamber excess air which decreases cremation times thus saving fuel cost. The combustion process is cycled and monitored by temperature and timer controls which ensure maximum efficiency throughout the cremation process. ACS-1 Pt£ 8t 'l'ouchscre~n " This operating system is our Automated Control System or ACS. The system includes the "TRILOGY" system as well as an onboard CPU that controls every function of the cremation process automatically. The PLC is also a Siemens Platform. It incorporates a 15" touchscreen control panel with excellent graphic presentation. The operator inputs the information into our custom designed "Case Builder" and the unit will perform all the operations for the cremation process automatically. The ACS also has a "Manual Run" feature that allows the operator to override the process if necessary. This operating system employs all the features of the ACS-1. Additionally, we install a Siemens Router and supply the customer with a tablet that has our Smart Client Platform. This system can be remotely monitored and controlled by the operator. The Instant Access allows our staff to continuously monitor the system from our office, laptop or smart devices. American Crematory can instantly access the client's units with a click of a button on our end. This allows our service team to diagnose and trouble shoot and solve any problem at anytime from anywhere in the world. Unlike our Competition we do not charge a monthly fee for this service. The ARIES operating system employs all the features of the ACS-1 and the Instant Access systems. The Aries System has the latest technology when it comes to combustion control and communication. This system allows for greater throughput due to our "Hot Load" capability. The additional features include 02 (Oxygen) Monitoring and Control, Draft Control, Fuel Monitoring and Control, Fuel Cost Calculation and a High-Velocity Combustion Blower System. The Aries System also has built in pressure transmitters and a proprietary smart logic system that allows for remote tuning of the combustion system. Guardian D.A.S. (Data Acquisition System) The Guardian D.A.S. employs all of the of the ACS-1, Instant Access and ARIES as well as the following features: PC interface, Dash Board View of all production data, Production Reporting of daily, monthly and yearly data, Maintenance Data Reporting and History, Maintenance Notifications, Data Storage, and Web Cam Stack Emissions Monitoring. Note: All Systems do not have any monthly fee unlike our competition - 16 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride PLC Touch Screen Controls Guardian D.A.S. System Data Acquisition System "State-of-the-Art Mechanics at Your Fingertips -Cutting Edge Technology with a Personal Touch" Guardian D.A.S. Features: • PC Interface: Remotely access your cremation system through virtual network computing anywhere internet is available. • Communication Link Directly to American Crematory Equipment Co., allows "ACE" to access your cremation system to provide immediate troubleshooting and diagnostic support. • Operator Assistance: Our direct link allows "ACE" the ability to control, monitor and assist your staff with the cremation process of a difficult or specialty case. • Touch Screen control & operation. • 02 Monitor and Control, allows "ACE" to make adjustments via the internet to your cremation system to insure peak performance and efficient operation. • Dash Board View of all necessary production data. • Production Reporting: Immediate access to daily, monthly and YTD reports in PDF format. • Maintenance Reporting: Provides detailed Service and Repair History for your cremation system in PDF format. (Provides the customer the ability to track and monitor the cremation system for budgetary purposes). • Maintenance Notifications: Provides operator with illuminated messages to remind him/her when specific service issues need to be addressed. • Data Storage: Stores all of your cremation system's data in the "cloud". • Web Cam: Optional web cam allows you to monitor the cremation room and stack emissions during operation. No Monthly fee Required! "Like" Us on Facebook to be the first to know about new equipment, products and technical updates: www.facebook.com/americancrematory www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 17 AMERICAN Cont Is Equipment ENGINEERED WITH INTEGRITY Our Panel Division "American Controls & Equipment Co., Inc." supplies a wide variety of custom control panel solutions to meet the demands of our customers and various other industries. We are built on providing high quality workmanship, on-time delivery and competitive pricing. OUR SERVICES INCLUDE: * Complete control solutions * Custom-built panels based on customer supplied documentation * Single-panel or complete system designs * Turnkey services by handling procurement of all materials * Consignment projects where the customer supplies some of or all the required parts We're here to help you meet your needs in any way possible to deliver an outstanding product. We stand behind our work! Custom-built panels tailored to each customer's specific needs All panels are full functioning and tested prior to shipment We subject our products to rigid inspection procedures offering North American/Canadian UL508A approval. Whether your requirement is for the assembly and wiring of a control panel or designing a complete system, American Controls & Equipment Co., Inc. can provide a cost effective, efficient solution that is both accurate and delivered on time. Customer service is our number one priority! Call us to discuss your next project. , 18 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Operator Training & Certification Programs Associated with ACC & CANA • ' ~, Assodation of ~ fl California ~ Cremationists • 'I Cremation Association i of North America rage ltampas· cipate e Loadic • The afternoon will consist of hands on instruction of the cremation unit, teaching everyone how to properly operate the unit safely, review safe guards, trouble shoot the equipment and provide a detailed explanation of the controls of the cremation unit. • We will also do a cremation with you as long as a case is available, and if not, we will simulate the cremation process. • Once everyone has successfully completed the Crematory Certification Training Class, Certificates will be mailed to your firm for every individual who attended the program. Top 11 Reasons Why You Need To Get Cremation Certified! 1. Get tools, including forms to enforce proper cremation procedures 2. Troubleshoot problems with cremators 3. Extend the life of your cremator 4. Learn how to properly inspect third-party crematories 5. Calculate the return on investment of buying a cremator 6. Navigate familial disputes while protecting your business 7. Avoid pitfalls that lead to lawsuits 8. Document everything you need in case you end up in court 9. Minimize problems when you make a mistake 10. Provide families with added peace of mind by becoming certified 11. Optional on-site training available. Call for quote & schedule. Certificate of Training .fllC:E;Tunenll:7/ome Jane:Ooe Yf,IY JUfft"Y.f/illlv am11,tl•lt'd'11i,· O·,·m,11,,,y (Jp,•mt,,r· Tmillll{1f 1'111,1,;1111 ,,,l,mir,.,1,,,n/1'.·II .5111i.•nr,:m l'rrmalory :lifutp,,umt (iJ. 'f'li,•pn:,11...rm c,mst:.1,•,1;,{1i,m,t;• ,m tmmilf// m tlir <',t't'f,llli'fl 1}/ ( iw11t1/ um :li/Uf/!llit'll/. ,1'7/in :tJ;,e ,1_j,1c1my l ;,r1,;1,•di11st m,·1,,r ttJll111111s1t~re•,tilit~/'r,wnun ,,,, Jul_i/ ... " .... ~ ~.uN,;. ,_,, /JJ /;rC'J Ce.rHfl~llw.No,<IJ0-4.UA .,...t,:.t((\:-... fl_ ~--f--.Lt1&,'...,_;-~ j;v r1"¥:11rl.f•nl J Ni:· lh''Pd,iwf www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 19 Service Our 24/7 Service Commitment American Crematory Equipment Co. is pleased to be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for troubleshooting, service, and repair of all makes and models of crematory equipment. It is our goal that your facility be up and running as soon as possible when we are called to help. We are proud to offer a 24/7 phone hotline to help you troubleshoot for the quickest resolution to your problem. If necessary, we will arrange for prompt service at your location. In addition, we offer a complete Tune up/Calibration/ Refractory Inspection or PMI (Preventative Maintenance Inspection) which includes a 5 page written report on the condition of your equipment to help you stay in compliance with your local air quality regulations. Call us to help maximize fuel efficiency, minimize emissions, and reduce your cremation time. Bilingual Technical Support for Service & Repair Equipment Upgrades Offered: • Stack Replacement • Hot Hearth Conversions • PLC Upgrades • Operating System Upgrades • Combustion Control Upgrades • Draft System Conversions American Crematory Equipment Co. carries a $2,000,000 liability insurance coverage program associated with our employees & workmanship. Manufacturing with Pride Repairs Refractory Repairs Our field technicians are factory trained on all makes and models of crematory equipment. American Crematory will provide all labor, materials, and equipment to complete your repairs. We will not ask you, the customer, to provide any labor or tools for the job. Our Proprietary Refractory Products are engineered with the customer's volume and demand in mind. Our "Good, Better, Best" product line gives our customers the ability to choose the product that fits their needs. We guarantee all of our products and workmanship for one year and your complete satisfaction. Financing on select refractory repair jobs available! Ask us about: Our New Interlocking Brick Upgrade Option American Crematory is proud to Introduce our NEW Interlocking Super Duty Fire Brick. American Crematory's proprietary interlocking fire brick has been designed and tested for structural strength and durability. The interlocking feature helps keep all perimeter and support walls from moving, shifting or leaning due to expansion and contraction, most commonly referred to as thermal shock. The 3200 degree fire brick rating along with our proprietary "Brick Lock" Mortar will add longevity to the refractory lining of your equipment. www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 21 AC-I (remator Charger American Crematory's cremator charger is designed with health and safety in mind to allow for safe, single-person, unassisted operation, while minimizing the risk of physical and repetitive strain injuries. One-of-a-kind docking station provides unique compatibility with your crematorium ensuring optimum, efficient, and safe charging, while reducing operating costs to save you money. The auto charging system's rapid charge speed also offers improved dignity for the deceased over manual charging. AMA0018 AC-1 Auto Charger Features include: ► Heavy-Duty Charge-adjustable charge on cases up to 1000 lbs (412kg), including traditional wooden caskets and cardboard varieties ► Rapid Charge Speed-adjustable down to 3.5 sec ensuring the cremator door is open for minimum time ► Easy-to-use Foot Pedal Locking Brake System-the charger can be locked to the floor for safe, stable charging ► Single Operator Use-whereas manual charging can require two technicians, automatic charging requires only one, freeing up staff for other duties ► One Charger Suits All-wide lifting range to enable loading and unloading of cremators, coolers, body storage/racking systems, and hearses ► Powered Drive System-patented retractable 5th wheel powered drive system with proportional throttle control ► Secure Locking System-by the press of a button, the case can be securely locked & unlocked for transportation ► Digital Weighing Option-integral weighing device to confirm charging weight to assist with accurate casket location in the cremator, while ensuring the safety of operators and compatibility to cremator ovens ► Single & Double Ended Cremators-controlled positioning compatibility of the casket beyond the hopper/cleanout for use with single or double ended cremators ► Dual Handset Controls-allows simultaneous use of cremator and charger controls from both sides of the charger ► Increased Control-superior positioning of the casket into the cremator, which minimizes process times, reducing energy costs High-capacity battery box--~ Powered drive wheel--- motor housing Dimensions Height Max 6'8" (2.03m) Min 1'9.5" (.546m) Length Base Unit 7'4" (2.24m) Overhang 2'6" (.762m) Width 2'1 O" (.863m) Side handles for easy maneuvering Anti-slip pads--~ (raises cases off rollers) 22 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Hydraulic Lift Tables Hydraulic Lift Table Custom Designs Made to Order! The American table is designed for use in loading crematories, funeral coaches, vans or coolers. It offers ease of use, maneuverability and durability. There are no pedals or pumps to operate. A narrow frame and large casters permit its use in tight spaces. The platform has five rollers and a locking mechanism to keep the load stationary. The heavy duty 12 volt battery will operate the lift table continuously for many hours without charging. AMA0008 Battery Powered Hydraulic Lift AMA0009 Battery Powered Hydraulic Lift -with Scale Heavy Duty Hydraulic Lift Table The LT2-HD is designed to provide you with the ability to lift, load and store heavy caskets and cases with ease. The LT2-HD is constructed with hardened cold rolled steel for strength and durability. The automatic push button remote can be removed or holstered for operation. The LT2-HD is designed to lift and load up to 1200 lbs. The LT2-HD also has the option of an onboard scale system so you know exactly what the load weight is. AMA0010 Heavy Duty Battery Powered Hydraulic Lift AMA0011 Heavy Duty Battery Powered Hydraulic Lift -with Scale Specifications Length 73 inches Width 30 inches Max Height 74.5 Inches Height when lowered 22 inches Weight Capacity 400-500 lbs. Upgrade Option: Built-in weight monitoring system Specifications Length Width Max Height Height when lowered Weight Capacity Upgrade Option: 73 inches 30 inches 44 inches 20 inches 1 000-12 00 lbs. Built-in weight monitoring system www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800} 396-2254 23 Electric Cremated Remains Processors l{Mfi A-1 Deluxe Processing Station The American A-1 Deluxe Processing Station is engineered to reduce bone fragments to fit into standard size urns, while providing ease of operation with a convenient work space, built-in fan system, built-in lighting system, and exterior venting. Includes: ► Personalized Light Bar to Display Your facility Name ► Customized light Bulb Color Option ► Your Choice of Processing Station Powder Coating Color --T064-GR05 T064-BL95 T064-GN81 C013-GR08 T013-BG38 T012-WH260 AMA0005 A-1 Deluxe Processing Station -Powder Coated AMA0006 A-1 Deluxe Processing Station -Stainless Steel lilfijft A-3000 Processing Station • plugs into a standard 110 volt outlet • 16" x "16" x 38" including drum Includes: ► LED Lighted Processing Area ► Ventless and dustless filter system with optional ducting to outside air or collection (bag house) ► 39" Process and Magnetizing Tray ► Twist & lock processing drum ► Direct drive process (no belts to change or tighten) ► Swivel casters for mobility ► Built in storage cabinet for supplies ► Laser etched logo or optional lighted logo AMA0007 A-3000 (remains Processing Station 24 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Electric Cremated Remains Processors Electric Cremated Remains Processors Cremated Remains Processors are engineered to reduce bone fragments to fit into a standard size urn. Each drive unit is equipped with a 1.5 horsepower industrial rated motor with direct drive to the drum shaft and an on/off switch with overload protection. Two hardened swivel cutting blades pulverize bone fragments in an average time of 30 seconds or less. A-2000 Processor • mounted on casters for easy movement • plugs into a standard 110 volt outlet • 16" x "16" x 38" including drum Available in: AMA0003 Gray Zolotone A-2000-S Ventless Processing Station • features a built-in fan with replaceable filter • no exterior venting necessary • 30" X 30" X 61" • heavy duty stainless steel construction • requires a 110 volt dual plug outlet with a 30 amp breaker AMA0004 Ventless Processing Station Replacement Parts and Service Available for All Makes & Models CAUTION! We recommend that the operator wear protective safety items at all times, when processing remains. www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 25 Storage & Cooling Racks 3 Tier Rack System with Laminate Boards • 4 Tier Rack System Storage Racks American Crematory's custom designed storage racks allow you to store numerous standard and cardboard caskets in a minimal space. Each shelf has rollers every 12 inches for easy loading and unloading from your lift table. Built to last, sections are either bolted or welded together for easy assembly (shippable units are bolted not welded). All portable racks are available in either side load or front load, and come with heavy duty casters. Laminate boards can also be provided upon request. Call for pricing. ACC0012 3 Body Rack I ACC0013 3 Body Rack -Stainless Steel ACC0014 4 Body Rack I ACC0015 4 Body Rack -Stainless Steel Cremation Pan Cooling Rack Cooling racks for your cremation pans. Available in 2 or 4 pan configurations. Custom racks for your specific needs. Please call for more information. PTU0006 Cremation Pan Cooling Rack -2 Shelves PTU0007 Cremation Pan Cooling Rack -4 Shelves 26 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Coolers & Custom Rack Systems Coolers & Custom Rack Systems Our coolers are custom designed to fit your facility's space requirements. Please call us to find out how we can help you maximize your capacity with a custom cooler and custom rack system. EQP3BCE 3 Body Cooler -Economy ACC0087 Optional Mounted Casters for 3 Body Cooler Cadaver Racks www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 27 Glmmtav ~-) J tREMATORY EQUIPMENT CO. ,, Refractory Lined and Stainless Steel Stack Options Refractory Lined Stacks American Crematory Equipment Co. provides 4-1/2" of 2500°F "no joint", cast liner for our premier refractory lined stacks to safeguard your facility. We make stacks for all makes and models to meet your specific requirements. Specifications 14 gauge steel or stainless steel 4-1 /2 inches of 2500°F cast liner 3 & 5 ft. flagged sections Painted to custom specifications Made to order per stack diameter Custom made offsets Stainless Steel Stack with Opacity System 28 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Containers, Discs, fr Rollers Temporary Plastic Urn The American Crematory temporary plastic urn is a container suitable for the temporary storage of cremated remains, and is sold in cases of 36. ACC0049 Black Temporary Plastic Urn Cardboard Mailers Cardboard mailers for the temporary cremated remains containers are also available. Cardboard mailers are die-cut for easy assembly and come in bundles of 50. ACC0045 Cardboard Mailers for Temporary Urns Cardboard Cremation Rollers Cardboard cremation rollers allow easy loading of a container into the cremation chamber and help reduce wear on the crematory floor. ACC0043 Standard Size 1-7 /8" dia. x 20" 100 rollers/case ACC0044 Heavy Duty 2-1/2" dia. x 18" 75 rollers/case Stainless Steel Identification Discs Identification discs are stainless steel and pre-numbered. Preprinted name and address available upon request. Standard size 1-1/4" diameter; also available in 1-1/2" diameter. Minimum of 250 discs per order. ACC0046 Stainless Steel Identification Discs Digital Scale with Ramp Simple and safe way to weigh each case prior to cremation. Please call for more details. (Lift table not included). AMA0016 Digital Scale with Ramp www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 29 I Cremation Tools Repositioning/Clean-out Tool The American repositioning tool is custom designed for easy positioning and clean-out of remains. This tool has a convenient 45° angle for easy usage. Although highly durable, it also helps prevent damage to your hearth because of its light weight construction. ACC0069 Set Screw I ACC0070 Threaded ACC0071 10 ft. Pole Clean-out Block Brush A heavy duty steel clean-out brush designed to prevent damage to your hearth. This custom brush has a 45° angle allowing for easy removal of cremated remains. Replacement of worn bristles is made by removing four screws and placing a new block brush in. ACC0003 Clean-out Block Brush I ACC000S Wire Replacement Brush Clean-out Strip Brush The American heavy duty brushes allow you to sweep your cremation chamber with less abrasion to the surfaces of the chamber, increasing the life of your refractory. Available with either a 1 /2 inch threaded or 3/4 inch set screw coupling, the brush head connects to 3/4 inch EMT available at your local hardware store. Available in 12 inch or 6 inch width (poles not included). ACC0036 6" Brush 3/4" Set Screw I ACC0037 6" Brush 1/2" Threaded ACC0038 12" Brush 3/4" Set Screw I ACC0039 12" Brush 1/2" Threaded ACC0040 12" Brush with Pole Double Strip Brush Available with the same connections and same widths as our regular strip brush, just twice as many bristles. ACC0014 Double Strip Brush Hand Magnet A powerful magnet to draw ferrous materials out of the remains prior to processing. Quick release handle to clear material from magnet. ACC0035 Hand Magnet Urn Loader Use this adjustable loading funnel to easily transfer cremated remains into an urn for final disposition. Loading height is adjustable and features a sliding stopper on the funnel neck. PTU0008 Powder Coated Standard Steel PTU0009 Stainless Steel 30 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Ash & Transfer Pans Inf ant Cremation Pan The American infant cremation pan is made of 12 gauge stainless steel and equipped with handles on each side for easy positioning. The pan's compact size allows it to fit in every type of cremation chamber. PTU0004 Infant Pan (Stainless Steel) Custom Ash Pans Ash pans are custom made to fit any crematory with a durable stainless steel or black iron construction. We can fit any make or model of cremator. Please specify model of cremator. Transfer Pan The American transfer pan was designed to place the cremains from the ash pan to the transfer pan for cooling, then to the processor. The unique, light weight, stainless steel pan is easy to handle and is a favorite tool used by our customers. PTU0005 Transfer Pan (Stainless Steel) Body Pan The body pan is constructed of light gauge steel and is designed to easily control difficult cremations. It contains and controls all remains and fluids, preventing damage to refractory. ACC0043 Body Pan American High Temperature Vacuum System The American High Temperature Vacuum System is ideal for picking up cremation residue. • portable with casters for easy movement • powerful 2 HP motor • 60" aluminum extension with clean-out tools • heavy duty hose and 30 foot cord VAC0001 American High Temperature Vacuum System ,, ,' .. ='·=-cc , =, . , -ff§J~+f\41(+.N/2~;.c-. '.""· ~ 9 ' • • . -~AP-}~\1~~••-~, ' ., ~'h ~ www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 31 01-merica,v ~-) .J bREMATORY EQUIPMENT CO. ~ .. Spare Parts Processor Pot Bearings PBB0015 Pot Bearings for American Crematory Processor PBB0016 Pot Bearings for B&L Processor PBB0017 Pot Bearings for IEE/Matthews Processor Processor Pot Blades • Stainless Steel, laser cut, tig welded • Pet Cremation Suggested Use: Straight Blades • Human Cremation Suggested Use: Swivel Blades MPS0127 Pot Blades for American Crematory Processor* MPS0129 Pot Blades for B&L Processor MPS0131 Pot Blades for IEE/Matthews Processor* *Heavy duty blades also available for American Crematory & IEE/Matthews Processors Complete Thermocouple Sets TCP0007 12" Thermocouple Set TCP0008 18" Thermocouple Set TCP0009 24" Thermocouple Set Honeywell & Partlow Chart Recorder Paper ACC0059 Honeywell 7 Day Chart Recorder Paper ACC0060 Honeywell 24 Hour Chart Recorder Paper ACC0061 Partlow 7 Day Chart Recorder Paper ACC0062 Partlow 24 Hour Chart Recorder Paper Replacement Chart Recorder Pens ACC0054 Honeywell Chart Recorder Pen, Red ACC0055 Honeywell Chart Recorder Pen, Blue ACC0056 Honeywell Chart Recorder Pen, Purple ACC0057 Partlow Chart Recorder Pen, Red ACC0058 Partlow Chart Recorder Pen, Green Hand Held Metal Detector ACC0029 Hand Held Metal Detector 32 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Spare Parts Replacement Filter ACC0041 Replacement Filter for Ventless Processing Station, 16"x16"x1" ACC0042 Replacement Filter for B&L ACF Relay CMP0002 ACF Relay Flame Pak CMP0003 Flame Pak Timofier U300 CMP0004 Timofier U300 Airflow Switch CMP0005 Grey Spring Airflow Switch CMP0006 Blue Spring Airflow Switch CMP0034 Atunes Airflow Switch lgnitors and Flame Rods lgnitors and Flame Rods available for all crematory makes and models Replacement parts available for all makes and models of cremators. Please call for more information. www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 33 Safety Equipment Standard Face Shield Standard face shields feature a high-impact polycarbonate lens, 8" x 15-1/2", 0.06" thickness, pre-injected curved lens, with a locking adjustable headpiece. Not for Welding. Meets ANSI Z87.1 + Standard. Replacement shields available. ACC0025 Clear Face Shield I ACC0027 Green Face Shield ACC0026 Clear Replacement Shield ACC0028 Green Replacement Shield Heat Reflective Face Shield Lightweight clear or tinted polycarbonate face shields featuring a thin layer of gold to reflect up to 99% of infrared (IR) and Ultraviolet (UV) radiation. The gold layer is protected by a scratch resistant coating. Shield is attached to an adjustable headgear. ACC0024 Heat Reflective Face Shield Standard Goggles Standard goggles offer economical eye protection with an impact resistant polycarbonate lens, flexible PVC construction, and an elastic headstrap. 99.9% UV Protection. Meets Current ANSI Z87.1 Standard ACC0016 Goggle Sidewinder Protective Eyewear High-impact polycarbonate lenses with adjustable, non-slip temples to fit a variety of face sizes. Ratchet inclination. Scratch-resistant lenses with anti-fog coating. 99.9% UV Protection. Ribbed non-slip nose cushion. Meets current ANSI Z87 .1 + Standard and CSA Z94.3 Standard. ACC0017 Clear Earmuff Hearing Protection Lightweight muff-style hearing protector with universal adjustment for under-the-chin, over-the-head or behind-head wear. ACC0018 Earmuff Hearing Protection Corded Foam Ear Plugs Self-adjusting, pre-shaped foam ear plug expands to fit virtually every wearer. ACC0019 Ear Plugs, 100 Pair Per Box 34 14530 Anson Avenue• Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Safety Equipment Low Maintenance Multi-Use Halfmask Respirator Halfmask respirator is made of durable silicone with a universal nose fit, a large sealing surface for excellent fit, and an advanced yoke design for a secure, comfortable no-slip fit. 1 Year Limited Warranty Halfmask Respirators. NIOSH Approved. Organic Vapor Cartridge/N95 Particulate ACC0020 Small ACC0021 Medium ACC0022 Large N95 Particulate Respirator Includes inner foam for a custom seal and a dual head strap for optimum fit. Maintenance-free. NIOSH approved. ACC0023 N95 Particulate Respirator, Box of 20 Shoe Covers Machine washable, slip-resistant PVC shoe covers slip on easily to keep shoes clean. ACC0070 Medium/Large Reflectorized Aluminum Apron The American apron provides the highest quality materials and offers superior insulation against radiant heat. 16 oz. aluminized flame retardant rayon reflects up to 90% of all radiant heat up to 1000° F. ACC0011 Aluminum Apron, One Size Fits All Reflectorized Aluminum Jacket The outside of this jacket is aluminized to reflect radiant heat. It has no pockets to trap hot particles and is oversized to fit over work clothes. The jacket has snaps at the wrist, a flap front with covered snaps, and a stand-up collar that's lined with green flame-resistant cotton. ACC0012 Medium I ACC0014 X-Large ACC0013 Large ACC0015 XXL www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 35 ~1 1 I ; Safety Equipment Aluminized Safety Gloves These aluminized backed gloves feature a cowhide palm, wool sock lining, keystone thumb and reinforced index finger. Provides radiant heat protection without sacrificing flexibility. A necessity for every operator. ACC0001 Aluminized Safety Gloves, 18" Leather Safety Gloves 100% brown leather gloves provide flexibility and protection. ACC0002 Leather Safety Gloves, 14" Cotton/Poly Knit -Latex Coated Palm Gloves Heavy weight dip and shell. Green latex crinkle finish palm coat. Knit back helps keep hand cooler longer. Abrasion Resistant. ACC0061 Medium/Large/Extra Large Split Leather Palm Gloves Standard side-split leather with full leather index finger. Cotton back with leather knuckle strap and elastic. 2-1 /2" rubberized safety cuff, gunn cut. ACC0023 One Size Fits All Dextera PF+EX Powder-Free Latex Examination Gloves 5 mil powder-free exam grade latex gloves. Excellent sensitivity, beaded cuff, consistent quality, economical latex protection, ambidextrous. Box qty: 100 gloves by weight ACC0062 Small/Medium/Large/Extra Large 36 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride Safety Equipment Raven Powder-Free Nitrile Gloves 6 mil powder-free nitrile gloves offering superior puncture and abrasion resistance. Latex-free, textured grip, beaded cuffs, ambidextrous. US Patent No. Re. 35.616. Box qty: 100 gloves by weight. ACC0003 Small ACC0006 X-Large ACC0004 Medium ACC0007 XXL ACC0005 Large Personal Eyewash Station Dual-bottle eyewash station for temporary first-aid until victim can reach a larger unit. Includes two 16 oz. bottles with twist-off tops. Durable plastic station available. Directions printed on station for fast reference. ACC0030 Eyewash Station, Dual Bottle I ACC0031 Eyewash/Irrigate Bottle Portable Eyewash Station Lack of an emergency eyewash station is one of the top OSHA citations. Protect employees as required by law and guard against personal injury claims. Station comes with water preservative. Change water every 90 days. Compliance -ANSI Z358.1. One-hand operation, gravity fed, 15-minute flow time. Holds up to 14 gallons of potable water, no plumbing required. Portable unit measures 11-1 /2" x 19-1 /2" x 25" and includes mounting bracket, inspection tag, and preservative. ACC0032 Eyewash Station Personal First Aid Kit Compact, lightweight kit contains an assortment of practical, single-use disposable items to treat injuries in a sanitary and simple way. Fits easily into backpack, toolbox, athletic bag and glove compartment. Ideal for travel, workshops, personal sports, and recreational needs. Meets ANSI Z308.1 Standard. ACC0034 Personal First Aid Kit Also Available Leather Aprons • Leather Sleeves • Denim Aprons www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 37 Index A D A-1 Deluxe Processing Station ......... 24 Digital Scale with Ramp .............. 29 A-200 .............................. 8 A-200P-3 .......................... 12 E A-200P-HT ......................... 15 Ear and Eye Protection ............... 34 A-250P-5 .......................... 10 Eyewash Stations ................... 37 A-250P-8 ........................... 9 A-250P-Quad ...................... 11 F A-250 .............................. 7 Face Shields ........................ 34 A-250WH-P ........................ 14 Filter .............................. 33 A-300 .............................. 6 First Aid Kit ........................ 37 A-350 .............................. 5 Flame Pak ......................... 33 A-375-SS ........................... 4 Flame Rods ........................ 33 A-400P-8 ........................... 9 A-SOOP-Equine/Batch ................ 13 G A-2000 Processors .................. 25 Guardian D.A.S. System ........... 16, 17 A-2000-S Processing Station .......... 25 Gloves A-3000 Processing Station ............ 24 Aluminized Safety ............... 36 AC-1 Cremator Charger .............. 22 Cotton/Poly Knit Latex ............ 36 ACE Controls & Equipment ........... 18 Leather Safety .................. 36 ACF Relay ......................... 33 Powder-Free Latex ............... 36 Airflow Switches .................... 33 Powder-Free Nitrile ............... 37 ACS-1 PLC & Touchscreen System. . .... 16 Split Leather Palm ................ 36 American "Instant Access" System. . ... 16 Goggles ........................... 34 American Standard System ............ 16 Aries System ....................... 16 H Apron, Reflectorized Aluminum ........ 35 Hand Magnet ...................... 30 Ash Pans .......................... 31 Hearing Protection .................. 34 Hydraulic Lift Tables ................. 23 B Body Pans ......................... 31 I Brushes Identification Discs, Stainless Steel ..... 29 Clean-out Block Brush ............ 30 lgnitors ........................... 33 Clean-out Strip Brush ............. 30 Infant Cremation Pan ................ 31 Double Strip Brush ............... 30 J C Jacket, Reflectorized Aluminum ........ 34 Cadaver Racks ..................... 27 Cardboard Cremation Rollers .......... 29 M Cardboard Urn Mailers ............... 29 Metal Detector ..................... 32 Chart Recorder Paper and Pens ........ 32 Multi-Chambered Pet Cremation Equip ... 9 Clean-out Tool ...................... 30 Coolers ........................... 27 0 Cooling Racks ...................... 26 Operator Training & Certification ....... 19 Cremated Remains Processors ...... 24, 25 Operating Systems .................. 16 Cremation Container ................ 29 Cremation Equipment Human ....................... 4-8 Pet ......................... 9-15 Cremation Pan Cooling Racks ......... 26 Cremation Tools .................... 30 Custom Rack Systems ............... 27 p Pans Ash Pans ....................... 31 Body Pans ...................... 31 Infant Cremation ................. 31 Transfer Pans .................... 31 Personal First Aid Kit. ................ 37 Portable Eyewash Stations ............ 37 Processing Stations ............... 24, 25 Processors ......................... 25 Processor Pot Bearings ............... 32 Processor Pot Blades ................ 32 R Racks Storage ........................ 26 Cooling ........................ 26 Custom ........................ 27 Refractory Lined Stacks .............. 28 Repairs, Refractory .................. 21 Replacement Parts ............... 32, 33 Repositioning Tool .................. 30 Respirators Halfmask Respirator .............. 34 N95 Particulate Respirator ......... 34 s Safety Equipment ............... 34 -37 Scale with Ramp .................... 29 Service ............................ 20 Shoe Cove~ ....................... 34 Spare Parts ..................... 32, 33 Stainless Steel Identification Discs ...... 29 Stainless Steel Stacks ................ 28 Storage Racks ...................... 26 T Temporary Plastic Urn ............... 29 Thermocouple Sets .................. 32 Timofier ........................... 33 Transfer Pan ....................... 31 u Urn Loader ........................ 30 Urn, Temporary Plastic ............... 29 V Vacuum System .................... 31 Ventless Processing Station ........... 25 38 14530 Anson Avenue • Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 I (562) 926-2876 Manufacturing with Pride www.AmericanCrematory.com I 24 Hr. Service Hot Line (800) 396-2254 39 . '• (;/t::ff ilr..5 ;:;~.:,.,, .._/ ~REMATORY EQUIPMENT CO.,. Manufacturing with Pride Subject: FW: Proposed crematorium From: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 4:05 PM To: Jim Kurata <9942769@gmail.com> Cc: jim.kurata@nafinc.com; jimmerslady@yahoo.com; CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: Proposed crematorium Hello Jim- Thank you for your email. It is my understanding that the proposed location is located close to the existing Administration Building where preparation for the cremations take place. It's also close to the existing parking lot and existing utilities. Additionally, you may wish to note that the State also licenses and regulates crematoriums. Sincerely, Amy Seeraty Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov Phone -{310) 544-5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov bt.,. CHITON r Google Play , 11:,, i: mail nK'ssacJe conta,ns information belonqinq to \he City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privile9ecl, confidential and/or prntecl:ed fron1 disclosure, The infonm1tion is intended only for US(' of tho individual or entity narned. lJnaut11orized cE,;sc1ni11aticm, cHstribut:ion, or copy:nci is strictly prohilitecl. If you rpceivcd this email in t~rror, or an~ not an intended recip1e1,t, please notify the scndt-:r immediately. Thank you for your r.bsistance 2nd cooperation, From: Jim Kurata <9942769@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 2:11 PM To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Cc: jim.kurata@nafinc.com; jimmerslady@yahoo.com; CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Proposed crematorium Why not make the crematorium further away from the residential neighborhood? Sent from my iPhone On Feb 14, 2023, at 1:21 PM, Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> wrote: 1 /. Hello Mr. Kurata- 1 would be glad to answer your question. The required setback for structures in Cemetery zoning districts per the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code Section 17.28.040.A.2 is 40 feet: 2. Interior Side and Rear. If abutting a residential zoning district, the interior side and rear setbacks shall be 40 feet. If abutting a nonresidential zoning district, the interior side and rear setbacks shall be 25 feet. Additionally, the existing Conditional Use Permit Condition No. 13.b (Setbacks for Above Ground Structures) for Green Hills also requires a 40-foot setback from the south property line: <image006. png> The proposed building would be located 154 feet from the south property line. Please let me know if you have any additional questions, thank you. Sincerely, <image007.png> Amy Seeraty Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov Phone -(310) 544-5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov <image003.jpg> <image004.png> <image00S.png> !his e-n1ail messa9e contains informa\ion bclonqinq to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privileqcd, confidential and/or protected from disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity nc1rnecl. Unauthorized dissemination, ciistribution, or· copyin9 is str·ictly prohibited. If you recdved this email in error, or w·c not an intended recipient, plca5c notify the ser1dc1· 1mm,cdiately. Thank you for· your ass:si:ancc and coopera\ion. From: Jim Kurata <9942769@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 10:46 AM To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Cc: jim.kurata@nafinc.com; jimmerslady@yahoo.com; CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Proposed crematorium What is the law for distance from residential neighborhood? Sent from my iPhone 2 On Feb 14, 2023, at 8:59 AM, Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> wrote: Hello Mr. Kurata- Your email was forwarded to me as I am the planner assigned to this project. Thank you for your email. I may be able to provide some information that will assist in answering some questions you or the other neighbors may have. Please note that the new crematorium building is proposed to replace the existing cremation facilities that are currently located in a basement garage of the existing Administration Building on the site, i.e., this is not new or in addition to the existing cremation facilities that have been there since the 1970s or 1980s. The operation of the cremation facilities are regulated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and Green Hills has an active permit with them that regulates the amount of natural gas they can use, and the level of emissions they are allowed. Additionally, it may be helpful to know that Green Hills replaced their older equipment with newer, more efficient equipment last year. Please let me know if you have any additional questions, thank you. Sincerely, Amy Seeraty Senior Planner City of Rancho Palos Verdes Community Development Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov amys@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5231 From: Jim Kurata <Jim.Kurata@Nafinc.com> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 6:51 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: jimmerslady@yahoo.com; 9942769@gmail.com Subject: Proposed crematorium Dear Council Members, My name is James Kurata, 310-994-2769, 9942769@gmail.com. I object to the proposed crematorium because of potential toxic fumes blowing my way. I live about 3 100 yards away from the proposed sight. There must be a law that prohibits the construction of a crematorium so near to a residential neighborhood. What pollutants come from crematorium? "The process of corpse cremation generates numerous harmful air pollutants, including particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and heavy metals," the report said, adding "these pollutants could have severe effects on the surrounding environment and human health." What is the most toxic element found in crematorium emissions? Is there evidence of health impacts due to exposure to crematoria emissions? As mentioned in Section 1, the pollutants of most concern from crematoria emissions are PCDD/Fs, Hg and fine particulate matter (PM ). PCDD/Fs and Hg are known to be toxic to humans and can bioaccumulate in tissues. Do you want to take the financial liability when human health and surrounding environment is adversely affected? Thank you, James Kurata 4 From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hello- Amy Seeraty Thursday, February 16, 2023 12:03 PM CityClerk Ara Mihranian; Octavio Silva FW: Green Hills' crematorium HOA -letter to City Council re GHs' crematorium Feb 2023.odt Please see the email below and attached letter as late correspondence for next weeks CC meeting, thank you. Amy Seeraty Senior Planner amys@rpvca.gov Phone -{310) 544-5231 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Website: www.rpvca.gov LOAD ...... OETITOU r,-Google: Play hi'.; e mail messa9e contains information belonqir,q to the City of Ra,,cho l\,los Verdes, which may be privileqecl, confidential and/or p:-otectecl from cii;;closure. The information is intended on!y for use of the individual or entity 11arned. U11<1uthori7ed clisscrnination, cbtribution, or copyin\1 is strictly pmhibited. If you received this crnail in error, or arc not an intended rccipicnt1 pica.so notify tr1c scncicr irnrncdlatc!y. Thank you for your assistance and coop<:'.ration, From: Glenn Cornell <gcornell6@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 11:13 AM To: David Bradley <david.bradley@rpvca.gov>; Eric Alegria <Eric.Alegria@rpvca.gov>; John Cruikshank <John.Cruikshank@rpvca.gov>; Barbara Ferraro <barbara.ferraro@rpvca.gov>; Paul Seo <paul.seo@rpvca.gov> Cc: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov> Subject: Green Hills' crematorium Council Members: I oppose the application to build a new crematorium in the southeast corner of Green Hills Memorial Park and ask that you consider the attached letter as you review that application. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions about the letter or wish to discuss the matter further. Thank you, Glenn Cornell 2004 Velez Drive Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 (310) 831-3033 1 I. February 16, 2023 Council Members: I write to you about an application to build a new gas-fired crematorium at Green Hills Memorial Park (hereinafter "GHs") to ask that you deny it. I live at 2004 Velez Drive in Rancho Palos Verdes in Rolling Hills Riviera, a tract of homes which lie immediately south of GHs. It is 2023. Though GHs may have operated a crematorium near Rolling Hills Riviera since at least the early Eighties, that is hardly a reason to allow it to continue to do so. Over the last 40 years, we have come to learn considerably more about fossil fuels and the their emissions. Little of that new knowledge has been positive. Methane itself has been found to be a potent greenhouse gas. Although natural gas does not produce as many harmful emissions as other fossil fuels, it is still far from clean. Yet GHs' application says little about monitoring what comes out of the proposed facility's smokestack. Reports about concerns over such emissions appear regularly in the news -their long-term harmful effect on the environment as well as on public health. Some communities have already banned gas appliances in new construction. Proposals have been put forward to make the ban statewide. So why would our city want to allow a large gas-fired incinerator to continue to operate in our midst for many more years to come? With our state, many municipalities and the federal government embracing a near future of "zero emissions," seeking approval in 2023 for a sizable facility which burns fossil fuels in our city is tone deaf and borders on contrariness. That the facility lies within a few dozen yards of where some of our neighbors live makes the notion all the more objectionable. I ask you to vote "No" to the application. Before closing, I would like to add a parting comment. It concerns the Planning Commission and the fact that GHs' application was not reviewed by it. That's unfortunate. Indeed, this application involves just the sort of issues which our Planning Commission, several of whose members have technical backgrounds, would have been eminently qualified to address. Until just a few years ago, GI--Is like nearly every other RPV resident would have had to submit its plans to the commission for review and public hearing. No longer. Though that change may have served GHs' interests, it has not served the community -the application in question being but one example. Accordingly, I ask that council members consider rescinding the exemption from Planning Commission review which GHs now enjoys, so that henceforth, GHs' applications will have to be reviewed just like those of any other property owner in our city. Thank you, Sincerely, Glenn Cornell Subject: Attachments: FW: PVHS Response to Paul Funk Letter of February 7, 2023 Reply to Funk Ltr.pdf From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 3:08 PM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: PVHS Response to Paul Funk Letter of February 7, 2023 Matt: I was cc'd via US Mail on the above letter from Paul Funk of the PVIC docents, and have the attached response. Thank you for adding it to the stack. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 31 0 265-2141 ( office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Feb 6, 2023 12:40 pm Subject: RE: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Hi Dana, Thanks for sharing your comments and concerns about reaction to PVHS's proposal. Your comments will be included as part of the staff report that the City Council is scheduled to consider at its Tuesday, February 21, 2023 meeting. The staff report will be available on Wednesday, February 15. Please go to https://ca- ranchopalosverdes2.civicplus.com/772/City-Meeting-Video-and-Agendas to access the staff report, City Council Agenda, and information on how to participate in the meeting virtually or in-person. Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst 1 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 9:40 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop OK, just wanted to make you aware that the overwhelming majority of the negative ones come from those who didn't care enough to attend any of the hearings and are therefore commenting from almost zero knowledge of the actual proposal. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 ( office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Feb 6, 2023 9:37 am Subject: RE: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Hi Dana, Good morning and thanks for sharing the link to the Nextdoor posting. I'll follow-up on the thread of responses that your referenced. The staff report that goes to the City Council will include a balanced analysis of all public comments received and the results from last week's workshop. 2 Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p C• .,:, ;Vt: '[ -,l: «",, \ :~f1 \'\ \ ~~:,," \~"" ~~,9 7J 20','> From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs,com> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 9:15 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca,gov>; CC <CC@rpvca,gov> Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Matt, You may be aware of the Saturday hijacking of the PV museum proposal on Nextdoor.com. Social media has a downside and unfortunately it has been displayed in spades. An individual who has never taken time to learn about our museum exploration activities nor heard the RPV or Historical Society presentations went off on a wild tangent to generate a lot of uninformed responses to you and the city council. His initial posting is copied below if you have not seen it. I am not aware of any of those commenting negatively attending any of the informational presentations. In spite of your efforts to have a public hearing to invite informed responses, I am concerned that many e-mail responses that you and the city council receive will be frivolous, uninformed responses to imagined concerns. We desire and seek public input if we are to create an outstanding museum, but I must inform you that an irrelevant negative element of social media has invaded our process. Posted on Next Door, Saturday, February 4, 2023 Dear Neighbors-Some folks want to build a rather ugly looking museum on the beautiful open space next to the Interpretive Center. We already have a museum there, and it would be a redundancy. They basically want to put images in there with the history of Palos Verdes. All of that could easily be achieved with a DVD or 3 YouTube video without destroying one of the last open landscapes. Take a moment to write an email to MattW@rpvca.gov and cc@rpvca.gov expressing how destroying this open land will eliminate the hunting grounds for the local great horned owls, red tail hawks, foxes, coyotes, and other creatures. It is no wonder the Palos Verdes Blue butterfly is almost extinct. We already have the Interpretive Center. The only ones who would benefit from this project are the contractors and anyone who has their hands in the cookie jar. Put the history of Palos Verdes in a video for those who want to learn. Why destroy more open lands? Send your emails today. We all moved to Palos Verdes for its scenic beautiful coastlines. Not to have more buildings to look at. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Fri, Feb 3, 2023 7:35 am Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop They can send any comments to my email and/or they can cc City Council at cc@rpvca.gov. I agree it was a very productive meeting. Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 7:11 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop 4 Matt: If PV people wish to send letters or emails to the City regarding their support for a PV historical museum, where should they send them? It has a ton of support in the community, but I'm not sure the City knows that. I know you want everything in by the 8th, but since I just woke up in the middle of the night and thought of this, that may not be possible. Anyway, please advise asap where they should be sent --at this point probably mostly emails. Thanks for a productive meeting Wednesday night. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Wed, Feb 1, 2023 9:29 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, No problem. I already combined the staff PPT with the PVHS PPT so I'll put these new slides at the end in case you want to pull them up. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p 5 (; ;~ ~ ' ' , ,,,_,, \ ... f "~z-~ .. r s1 {) •1 '> From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 7:09 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Matt: Will you tag the attached onto the end of tonite's presentation? They are just back-up pictures in case we need them. Either that or they can be a separate Powerpoint that whoever is running this behind the scenes can switch to if I give the word. Sorry this is last minute, but between doing business, trying to keep La Venta open, and Historical Society stuff, it's been a bit busy. See you tonite. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2023 9:16 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Thanks for sending the updated presentation. I'll make sure it's uploaded and ready for showing on Wednesday. The format will be more informal than a Council meeting. Staff will make introductions and give some background information, followed by your presentation. After that, it will be an open forum for the public to make comments and ask questions of Staff and PVHS. City staff will ask as moderator to ensure everyone who wants to speak is able to. Attendees will be asked to fill out comment/response cards as well. I'll send you the agenda once it's finalized. Should be an interesting evening. Feel free to call me with any questions. 6 Thanks- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2023 8:35 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Matt, et al: attached is the presentation on the museum I will be giving Wednesday evening; a slight modification of the one I gave the PVIC docents (who now seem to be objecting) last September or so and to the Council last November. I'm just sending it so if you want to load it into the system, you can. What is the meeting format? Is it like a CC meeting where everyone gets 3 minutes, and/or are we sitting around the room in a circle like the Paris Peace Talks? Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> 7 Sent: Thu, Jan 19, 202311:05 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Sounds good-thanks. Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p ' '\) (_;\ ,<·~ ~'t ='"·½ \ ~;,~?' \,.,~ '•,f..'!./. J . 1) 'l S From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2023 11 :04 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Yeah, sorry, go ahead. Trying to round them all up, but go ahead and post. At least some of us will be there. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) 8 -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahqraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Thu, Jan 19, 2023 10:55 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Following up to see if a Feb. 1 6pm workshop date at Hesse Park works for you and other members of the Historical Society. Please let me know as soon as you can since we need to start inviting residents and interested parties. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Matt Waters Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 8:43 AM To: Dana H Graham <danahqraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Yes, definitely not just you and me. It would be a City-sponsored open-to-the-public informational workshop. The intent is to inform the public about the proposed 9 project, provide information, and solicit feedback. All City HOAs, interested parties, residents living near to the Civic Center and Lower Point Vicente, and the general public typically would be invited. The Historical Society should be there for sure. We'd like to start publicizing the workshop by the end of the week or early next week at the latest so please let me know if Feb. 1 works for you and the Historical Society. Feel free to give me a call to discuss if you'd like. Thanks- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p ,'!'(,~ .. ,\ . ., \ . ·;' ., \ ~ I◊, ''.\, "",.,7 J -0 :t From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 7: 19 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Thaniks Matt: who attends this? low, when you say public, I assume the public is invited as well as any other concerned parties --it's not just you and me sitting across a table. The Board of the Historical Society is only 5 people (one recently passed away), and I'm guessing most or all would want to attend. If you can just shed some light before I approach them, that would be good. Thanks Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum 10 Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2023 5: 17 pm Subject: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Good evening. We have a tentative date of Wed. Feb. 1 at 6pm at Hesse Park for a public workshop on the PV Historical Society proposal. Let me know if that date and time works for you. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p (! ·..;<::-:;-:;,; .) , .. ,, \ f,. \\ ..... , '<t ✓, 0·1 " 11 0 Rancho de Los Palos Verdes Historical Society and Museum February 15, 2023 Mr. Matt Waters, I was copied on a recent letter to you from Paul Funk which was disappointing. In that letter he took a defensive rather than progressive position regarding the new museum being proposed by the Palos Verdes Historical Society (PVHS). While stating no opposition to a PVHS museum he stated that it would be "a duplication of most of the topics already included in the PVIC museum". Yes, it would be. It would be an expansion of those topics. The PVHS studied the scope of the Peninsula history then divided it into those topics, or categories, to best define separate museum galleries. Those topics cover the full Peninsula history and would be covered in a museum wherever it was located. The PVHS has no intention of duplicating PVIS displays, only to expand displays and education within a topic. Paul Funk's letter also stated that the new museum would interfere with the Outside Exhibit Project proposed as far back as 1970. This was discussed in the public meeting you chaired, and it is not clear that interference will occur. If it did occur, the museum location can be moved slightly within the planned area so long as it remains adjacent to the parking and within the PVIC coastal view shadow so that there is no additional loss of coastal view. There is plenty of room for both. Our architect, in considering the sloped area, is also seeking a "net zero" soil removal/addition, so that may slightly affect choice of museum location. The process of architecture, approval, and construction of a new museum would take considerable time. I expect, however, that it would be more rapid than the apparent slow pace of improvements at the PVIC and it would be done without direct cost to the PVIC and RPV. The Los Serenos does not want to commit to docent support; however, a commitment is not needed at this time. The PVHS will commit to working with Los Serenos on docent support. We anticipate that a new museum would draw increased interest and docent volunteers. We believe that ultimately the docent function must be integrated to best achieve a coordinated operation of the two museums. The PVHS stated goal is to re-establish an outstanding museum. It is included in our official name '"Rancho de los Palos Verdes Historical Society and Museum". We believe that a collocated expansion of the PVIC best serves our objectives, PVIC goals and stature, and would be a substantial asset to RPV and the Peninsula generally. Jirely, D~ent Palos Verdes Historical Society Palos Verdes Historical Society, PO Box 3295, Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 A non-profit 50lc3 public service organization, Tax ID/EIN 47-0988647 Subject: Attachments: FW: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Comments to City.pdf From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 7:33 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop I Matt: Here are my comments on the sheet you handed out at the 2/1 workshop. Some of those people who made negative comments and said they wrote letters/emails are starting to come around now that they know a bit about what's proposed. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Feb 6, 2023 12:40 pm Subject: RE: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Hi Dana, Thanks for sharing your comments and concerns about reaction to PVHS's proposal. Your comments will be included as part of the staff report that the City Council is scheduled to consider at its Tuesday, February 21, 2023 meeting. The staff report will be available on Wednesday, February 15. Please go to https://ca- ranchopalosverdes2.civicplus.com/772/City-Meeting-Video-and-Agendas to access the staff report, City Council Agenda, and information on how to participate in the meeting virtually or in-person. Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst 1 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 9:40 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop OK, just wanted to make you aware that the overwhelming majority of the negative ones come from those who didn't care enough to attend any of the hearings and are therefore commenting from almost zero knowledge of the actual proposal. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Emily Rodin <EmilyR@rpvca.gov>; Daniel Trautner <DanielT@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Feb 6, 2023 9:37 am Subject: RE: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Hi Dana, Good morning and thanks for sharing the link to the Nextdoor posting. I'll follow-up on the thread of responses that your referenced. The staff report that goes to the City Council will include a balanced analysis of all public comments received and the results from last week's workshop. 2 Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p '""' \ "'·J!:·ci. __ ~/,< ' '-,J/,:~" ✓, o '1 . From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 9:15 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop Matt, You may be aware of the Saturday hijacking of the PV museum proposal on Nextdoor.com. Social media has a downside and unfortunately it has been displayed in spades. An individual who has never taken time to learn about our museum exploration activities nor heard the RPV or Historical Society presentations went off on a wild tangent to generate a lot of uninformed responses to you and the city council. His initial posting is copied below if you have not seen it. I am not aware of any of those commenting negatively attending any of the informational presentations. In spite of your efforts to have a public hearing to invite informed responses, I am concerned that many e-mail responses that you and the city council receive will be frivolous, uninformed responses to imagined concerns. We desire and seek public input ifwe are to create an outstanding museum, but I must inform you that an irrelevant negative element of social media has invaded our process. Posted on Next Door, Saturday, February 4, 2023 Dear Neighbors-Some folks want to build a rather ugly looking museum on the beautiful open space next to the Interpretive Center. We already have a museum there, and it would be a redundancy. They basically want 3 to put images in there with the history of Palos Verdes. All of that could easily be achieved with a DVD or YouTube video without destroying one of the last open landscapes. Take a moment to write an email to MattW@rpvca.gov and cc@rpvca.gov expressing how destroying this open land will eliminate the hunting grounds for the local great horned owls, red tail hawks, foxes, coyotes, and other creatures. It is no wonder the Palos Verdes Blue butterfly is almost extinct. We already have the Interpretive Center. The only ones who would benefit from this project are the contractors and anyone who has their hands in the cookie jar. Put the history of Palos Verdes in a video for those who want to learn. Why destroy more open lands? Send your emails today. We all moved to Palos Verdes for its scenic beautiful coastlines. Not to have more buildings to look at. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Fri, Feb 3, 2023 7:35 am Subject: Re: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop They can send any comments to my email and/or they can cc City Council at cc@rpyca.goy. I agree it was a very productive meeting. Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 7:11 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: Urgent --PV Historical Society Workshop 4 Matt: If PV people wish to send letters or emails to the City regarding their support for a PV historical museum, where should they send them? It has a ton of support in the community, but I'm not sure the City knows that. I know you want everything in by the 8th, but since I just woke up in the middle of the night and thought of this, that may not be possible. Anyway, please advise asap where they should be sent --at this point probably mostly emails. Thanks for a productive meeting Wednesday night. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 ( office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Wed, Feb 1, 2023 9:29 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, No problem. I already combined the staff PPT with the PVHS PPT so I'll put these new slides at the end in case you want to pull them up. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p 5 From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 7:09 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Matt: Will you tag the attached onto the end of tonite's presentation? They are just back-up pictures in case we need them. Either that or they can be a separate Powerpoint that whoever is running this behind the scenes can switch to if I give the word. Sorry this is last minute, but between doing business, trying to keep La Venta open, and Historical Society stuff, it's been a bit busy. See you tonite. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www. Dana Graham. com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2023 9:16 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Thanks for sending the updated presentation. I'll make sure it's uploaded and ready for showing on Wednesday. The format will be more informal than a Council meeting. Staff will make introductions and give some background information, followed by your presentation. After that, it will be an open forum for the public to make comments and ask questions of Staff and PVHS. City staff will ask as moderator to ensure everyone who wants to speak is able to. Attendees will be asked to fill out comment/response cards as well. I'll send you the agenda once it's finalized. Should be an interesting evening. Feel free to call me with any questions. 6 Thanks- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2023 8:35 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Matt, et al: attached is the presentation on the museum I will be giving Wednesday evening; a slight modification of the one I gave the PVIC docents (who now seem to be objecting) last September or so and to the Council last November. I'm just sending it so if you want to load it into the system, you can. What is the meeting format? Is it like a CC meeting where everyone gets 3 minutes, and/or are we sitting around the room in a circle like the Paris Peace Talks? Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahqraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> 7 Sent: Thu, Jan 19, 2023 11 :05 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Sounds good-thanks. Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2023 11 :04 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Yeah, sorry, go ahead. Trying to round them all up, but go ahead and post. At least some of us will be there. Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 1 O PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) 8 -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Thu, Jan 19, 2023 10:55 am Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Following up to see if a Feb. 1 6pm workshop date at Hesse Park works for you and other members of the Historical Society. Please let me know as soon as you can since we need to start inviting residents and interested parties. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p \ \' (✓ :.~ ' </; '·'%. I ' c~:.... ;. \ ,; \ ••a,,,.< ~<?, 7 .J '/ () 1 '), From: Matt Waters Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 8:43 AM To: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Yes, definitely not just you and me. It would be a City-sponsored open-to-the-public informational workshop. The intent is to inform the public about the proposed 9 project, provide information, and solicit feedback. All City HOAs, interested parties, residents living near to the Civic Center and Lower Point Vicente, and the general public typically would be invited. The Historical Society should be there for sure. We'd like to start publicizing the workshop by the end of the week or early next week at the latest so please let me know if Feb. 1 works for you and the Historical Society. Feel free to give me a call to discuss if you'd like. Thanks- Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p t./~ ..... ' ,\ ' \ f; \ ' ~-!·>;, .. ,:i"> •. • .J 1 () From: Dana H Graham <danahgraham@cs.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 7:19 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: PV Historical Society Workshop date Thaniks Matt: who attends this? low, when you say public, I assume the public is invited as well as any other concerned parties --it's not just you and me sitting across a table. The Board of the Historical Society is only 5 people (one recently passed away), and I'm guessing most or all would want to attend. If you can just shed some light before I approach them, that would be good. Thanks Dana Graham DRE #00877973 Top 10 PV agents (Listings Sold) Berkshire Hathaway Chairman's Circle Platinum 10 Website: www.DanaGraham.com 310 613-1076 (cell) 310 265-2141 (office) -----Original Message----- From: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> To: Dana H Graham <danahqraham@cs.com> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov> Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2023 5: 17 pm Subject: PV Historical Society Workshop date Hi Dana, Good evening. We have a tentative date of Wed. Feb. 1 at 6pm at Hesse Park for a public workshop on the PV Historical Society proposal. Let me know if that date and time works for you. Thanks- Matt Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.rpvca.gov mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p 11 Palos Verdes Historical Society Museum Proposal February 1, 2023 Public Workshop Comment/Response Card Is it important that the City of Rancho Palos Verdes have a historical museum? Circle your response: Yes No How likely would it be that you would visit a historical museum in Rancho Palos Verdes? (1 being least likely, S being most likely): Circle Your Response: 1-----2------3--------4----<:i) What is preferred location for a potential historical museum? Circle Your Response: A. Ken Dyda Civic Center (RPV City Hall) ,@.ower Point Vicente Park C. No opinion Indicate your level of support for a historical museum if it was paid for with private funds but operated and staffed at City expense? (1 being lowest level of support, 5 the highest level of support) Circle Your Response: 1-----2------3--------4-----W Comments: \ fict?.."i ~tt;, ~c-Jtb, '1"" ~0$ t..\\d;; 1t.?# lv\reM=r Ac::::tl? ~M~ KA ,bm,e Q..o'-1:;-tt>, SThff::t«N'GC~DMffi?: ~5 t:1!#-1-- ,-Je~~ Jz2 r½t:% 4 I t>Q Nd'llc.cl. :qJ4f" '.lli:e: a?tx:\MENJ:S: Ocl NtUTt>eot;Z ,~ "' ~ A:Y= ~ itk::t'& wt+o ~ NP'C~eo @-U§ o~ ::n-nb Bf2Jf&f\Nkz: Qc?::C :J>::Uz MYSbaJM Subject: FW: Proposed building for PV artifacts museum -----Original Message----- From: Rebecca <rebecca.haeri@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 10:27 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: Proposed building for PV artifacts museum EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe!!!. Resending to correct email address ... > On Feb 17, 2023, at 8:13 PM, Rebecca <rebecca.haeri@gmail.com> wrote: > > To whom it may concern, > > I am writing, as a resident of Rancho Palos Verdes, to express my strong opposition to the proposed building of a new museum to house Palos Verdes artifacts near the site of the current PV Interpretive Center. > > This location is one of my most favorite parts about being a PV resident, and one I frequent often to enjoy the peaceful nature and ocean views. I am absolutely horrified that a group dedicated to preserving the legacy of PV thinks it's a good idea to pave this peace of paradise to put up yet another building, and what's sure to accompany it-another parking lot. There are many vacant and underutilized buildings already built throughout the peninsula. There is absolutely not a single good reason to spoil any of our remaining open spaces to erect yet another building for, let's face it, a museum that is likely to get few visitors. > > My understanding is that it is a key part of the city's mission to preserve open spaces. In that spirit, I ask that you reject this proposal and keep our open spaces intact for future generations to enjoy. > > Thank you for your consideration, > > Rebecca Haeri > RPV resident 1 J. Subject: FW: Palos Verdes Historical Society proposal Attachments: Opposition to PV Historical Society use of Pt. Vicente.pdf From: bsattler <bsattler@igc.org> Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2023 9:54 PM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Al <alsattler@igc.org>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov> Subject: Palos Verdes Historical Society proposal Dear Mr. Waters, Attached are our comments regarding the proposal by the Palos Verdes Historical Society to use public parkland at Lower Point Vicente. Alfred & Barbara Sattler 1 February 18, 2023 re: Palos Verdes Historical Society Proposal for Lower Point Vicente Dear Mr Waters, We are strongly opposed to the Palos Verdes Historical Society's proposal to use any part of public parkland on Lower Point Vicente to construct a museum. Lower Point Vicente is a unique site that is precious to our community. The public enjoys the ocean vista, the opportunity to watch for whales and other wildlife, a beautiful location for picnics or family outings, a pleasant and easy coastal trail, a beautiful native plant garden and the existing amenities of the Point Vicente Interpretive Center. Whatever additions might be added to the site have already been designed and approved by the City. It needs nothing more than that. The very openness of the natural space as it now exists is an integral part of Lower Point Vicente's charm and value to the people of our community. One would think that a "historical" society would have more awareness of recent Rancho Palos Verdes history to know that a previous proposal to build a large structure on that site met with overwhelming public opposition. Instead, the Historical Society has gone so far as to ask that the City ignore any opposition letters - claiming that their sales pitch was "hijacked" by a Nextdoor blast, rather than acknowledging that there are many people in RPV who are legitimately opposed to this proposed project. Please do not entertain this proposal any further. Public parkland in Rancho Palos Verdes is not up for grabs. The Palos Verdes Historical Society may well need and deserve a space for a museum to house and display its collections. However such a facility would be better suited to a more urban setting, preferably one which is nearby to other cultural assets such as the Palos Verdes Peninsula Main Library. Close proximity of facilities such as these to each other would make a lot of sense and facilitate historical research. Surely there must be a building or site that could be purchased by the "Anonymous Potential Donor" in such a location. Sincerely, Alfred and Barbara Sattler Subject: FW: Proposed museum -----Original Message----- From: Michael Majid <michael.majid@vistasir.com> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 2:23 PM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Proposed museum EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe!!!. Good afternoon, As a lifelong resident of Rancho palos Verdes, (since 1969), I would like to express my objection to the construction of any building near the current interpretative center. Over the years I have seen this beautiful hill go from untouched pastoral areas to becoming Overdeveloped and commercialized which has destroyed its natural beauty and appeal. I believe maintaining open spaces is truly in the best interest of the residents of this great city. Therefore, I strongly urge you to deny the creation of any building in this area. Respectfully, Michael Majid c 310.592.1243 <tel:310.592.1243> I DRE# 01123908 < https://s33. posti mg.cc/Seo 7xs6I b/M ichael_Face .jpg> <http://www. michael majid .com/> Vista Sotheby's International Realty 35 Peninsula Center I Rolling Hills Estates I CA 90274 <x-apple-data-detectors://1> www.michaelmajid.com<http://www.michaelmajid.com/> I ZILLOW <https://www.zillow.com/profile/michaelmajid/> I < https://www.ye Ip. com/biz/ m icha e I-ma j id-sot he bys-i nte rnatio na I-rea lty-ra ncho-pa los-ve rdes-2 > YELP <https://www.yelp.com/biz/michael-majid-sothebys-international-realty-rancho-palos-verdes-2> Top 10% of agents for Sotheby's lnt'I Realty Each franchise independently owned and operated. 1 J. Subject: FW: Potential New Building at Point Vicente -----Original Message----- From: Charles Foster <hc_foster@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 9:23 AM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Potential New Building at Point Vicente EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe!!!. Dear Mr. Waters, I am writing to share my objection to any additional construction of buildings in the open space near Point Vicente. I've been a resident of the Peninsula since 1975 and have seen firsthand the loss of so much of our precious open space. At the same time I've been encouraged by Rancho Palos Verdes' many efforts to preserve selected areas. In particular I appreciate the paths and native plant restoration around the Point Vicente area and visit this area weekly. While I also value our Peninsula's history -and miss the wonderful display of artifacts that was once situated at Malaga Cove School -I very strongly feel that construction of a new building near the Point Vicente Interpretive Center is not beneficial to the land or the community. Rather I would hope that native plant restoration efforts be continued in this area so it becomes even better habitat for wildlife and birds. I'm hoping the historical collection could be housed either within the footprint of the existing Interpretive Center building, or at another more suitable location preferably within an existing building elsewhere in the South Bay. Thank you for your consideration, H. Charles Foster 1804 Via Olivera Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 1 Subject: FW: City approval for PV Historical Society Museum -----Original Message----- From: Trish Lange <trish1ange5@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 1:04 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: City approval for PV Historical Society Museum EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe!!!. Dear Council Members, Please give approval to the request for a local history museum to serve the Peninsula. Our area has a rich and fascinating history. We are blessed with an historical society that has accumulated an enormous collection of items that date back to the beginning of the Palos Verdes Project, or approximately 100 years. Various events have celebrated our Peninsula history, and in 2023 there are several 100 year celebrations. People are very interested in our local history. A place is needed to house our local history materials, display the many artifacts and stories. If it were to be located near the Point Vicente Interpretive Center, it would create a complex of broad community interest as well as attracting more regional visitors. It would be a cultural "feather in our cap." The current design, as supported by Dana Graham, President of the PV Historical Society, would be akin to a Frank Loyd Wright design in the way that it aligns with the landscape. It protects ocean views, is well-sized for its purpose, and importantly, funds are available to support the construction. Please give full consideration to this plan. This seems like a winner for RPV and the Peninsula. Trish and Don Lange 43 year residents of the Peninsula Sent from my iPhone 1