CC SR 20211207 I - PSA for Pavement Management Program
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 12/07/2021
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar
AGENDA TITLE:
Consideration and possible action to award a Professional Services Agreement to
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. for engineering services for the City’s Pavement
Management Program – Triennial Update.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Award a Professional Services Agreement to Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
for engineering services for the City’s Pavement Management Program – Triennial
Update in the not-to-exceed amount of $172,798 with a contingency of 15% or
$25,919.70;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement, in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney; and,
(3) Approve an additional appropriation of $48,718 in the Gas Tax Fund for the
Pavement Management Program services.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost for the pavement management program is $198,718,
including the 15% contingency. Staff is recommending that an
additional $48,718 in the Gas Tax Fund be appropriated to this CIP
project
Amount Budgeted: $150,000
Additional Appropriation: $48,718
Account Number(s): 202-400-8844-8001 (CIP – Pavement Management Program – Triennial Upddate /Professional
Services)
ORIGINATED BY: James O'Neill, Project Manager
REVIEWED BY: Ramzi Awwad, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY: Ara Mihranian, AICP, City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
A. Professional Services Agreement with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
(page A-1)
B. Request for Proposals for Consultant Services for the City’s Pavement
Management Program – Triennial Update (page B-1)
C. Fee proposal from Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. (page C-1)
1
CITYOF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
D. FY 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program Project Sheet for Pavement
Management Program – Triennial Update (page D-1)
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
A triennial update to the City’s Pavement Management Program is required by the Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) for the City to continue to
receive Proposition C funding, and the last update was performed in 2019.
The Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes a triennial
update to the City’s Pavement Management Program (Attachment D).
On September 8, 2021, the City advertised a request for proposals (RFP) for engineering
services for the City’s Pavement Management Program – Triennial Update.
Originally, the assessment of public roadway pavement was going to be performed
separately from city-wide assessments of public sidewalks, curb ramps, guardrails and
traffic signs, but Staff saw an opportunity to combine these assessments to realize
efficiencies. As a result, the scope of services was expanded to include those
assessments, and is more thoroughly described in the attached RFP (Attachment B).
Generally, the scope of services includes assessing the current condition of, and
developing a recommended schedule of rehabilitation, repair and preventative
maintenancefor the City’s:
▪ Pavement on public roads
▪ Pavement on parking lots of major City facilities
▪ Curbs and gutters
▪ Sidewalks
▪ Curb ramps
▪ Medians
▪ Guardrails
▪ Roadway signs
One proposal was received by the October 6, 2021 deadline, and an evaluation panel of
three members, comprised of the Director of Public Works, the City’s Principal Engineer,
and the Project Manager, evaluated the proposal.
The evaluation panel found that the proposal, from Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
(Bucknam), was responsive to the RFP and that the firm was well qualified to perform the
work. The Project Manager then began negotiations with Bucknam that concluded with a
fixed price fee proposal and refined scope (Attachment C).
The fee of $172,798 and contingency of 15% or $25,919.70 equates to a maximum
contract amount of $198,717.70, which exceeds the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
budget amount of $150,000. The CIP budget was based on an asset management
program for the City’s pavement only, as Staff planned to introduce new asset
management programs for the other infrastructure asset classes as separate projects
2
over time. However, Staff saw an opportunity to include the other asset classes in this
effort and realize savings from reduced overhead, as well as an accelerated schedule.
Therefore, Staff recommends an additional appropriation of $48,718 to expand the scope
of services.
The project schedule anticipates starting design work in December and presenting the
final report to the City Council in April 2022.
Staff recommends awarding a Professional Services Agreement (Attachment A) to
Bucknam for engineering services for the City’s Pavement Management Program –
Triennial Update.
ALTERNATIVES:
In addition to Staff recommendation, the following alternative action s are available for the
City Council’s consideration:
1. Reject the Professional Services Agreement with Bucknam and re-solicit services
to seek more proposals to consider.
2. Take other action, as deemed appropriate.
3
1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
By and Between
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
and
BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, INC.
for the
ROADWAY ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM UPDATE
A-1
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND
BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, INC
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (“Agreement”) is made and
entered into on December 7, 2021, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES,
a California municipal corporation (“City”) and BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP,
INC, a California corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to,
individually or collectively, as “Party” or “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals, the performance of the
services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.
B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal for the performance of the
services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the
City to perform those services.
C. Pursuant to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, City has authority
to enter into and execute this Agreement.
D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of
those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that
the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by
the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
1.1 Scope of Services.
In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall
provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services”, as stated in the Proposal, attached
hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein
as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this
Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and
facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough,
competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services
contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its
ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it
shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required
hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose
intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean
A-2
2
those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work
under similar circumstances.
1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.
The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s Proposal which shall be incorporated
herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency
between the terms of such Proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall
govern.
1.3 Compliance with Law.
Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder
in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any
Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is
rendered.
1.4 California Labor Law.
If the Scope of Services includes any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those
terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of
Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more,
Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in
California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws,
including the following requirements:
(a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that some or all of the work to be
performed under this Agreement is a “public work” as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and
that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1
(commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts
and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”)
implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance
monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by
regulation.
(b) Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent
required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the
prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any
interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Consultant
acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of the prevailing rate of per diem
wages, and Consultant shall post a copy of the same at each job site where work is performed
under this Agreement.
(c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall comply with
and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment
of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The
Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit $200 (two hundred dollars) for each calendar
A-3
3
day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the
DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to
this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.
(d) Payroll Records. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the
provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subconsultant to:
keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as
specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as
provided by Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records.
(e) Apprentices. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions
of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8,
Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects.
Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all
apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall
provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program.
Within 60 (sixty) days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of
its subconsultants shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice
hours performed under this Agreement.
(f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Consultant acknowledges that 8 (eight) hours labor
constitutes a legal day's work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section
1810.
(g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by
the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess
hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit $25 (twenty five dollars for each
worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any
subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work
more than 8 (eight) hours in any one calendar day and 40 (forty) hours in any one calendar week
in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of 8
(eight) hours per day, and 40 (forty) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public
work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than one
and 1½ (one and one half) times the basic rate of pay.
(h) Workers’ Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700
provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its
employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code
Section 1861, Consultant certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require
every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to
undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will
comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of
this contract.”
A-4
4
Consultant’s Authorized Initials ________
(i) Consultant’s Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor
who will perform work under this Agreement, Consultant shall be responsible for such
subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720)
of the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract with
any subcontractor for work under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to take all actions
necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance,
including without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the
subcontractor on a periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to
pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take
corrective action to halt or rectify any such failure by any subcontractor.
1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.
Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals
as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement.
Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus
applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary
for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any
such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City
hereunder.
1.6 Familiarity with Work.
By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly
investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered
how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and
restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve
work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or
will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services
hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will
materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform
the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions
are received from the Contract Officer in the form of a Change Order.
1.7 Care of Work.
The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to
furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents,
plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be
responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City,
except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.
A-5
5
1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties.
Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective
obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all
instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry
out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible
for the service of the other.
1.9 Additional Services.
City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without
invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services
or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be
undertaken unless a written Change Order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant,
incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra
work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the
written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to 15% (fifteen percent)
of the Contract Sum; or, in the time to perform of up to 90 (ninety) days, may be approved by the
Contract Officer through a written Change Order. Any greater increases, taken either separately
or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant
that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of
Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided
pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant
anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City
may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims
for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures
established in this Section are followed.
If in the performance of the contract scope, the Consultant becomes aware of material defects in
the scope, duration or span of the contract or the Consultant becomes aware of extenuating
circumstance that will or could prevent the completion of the contract, on time or on budget, the
Consultant shall inform the Contracting Officer of an anticipated Change Order. This proposed
change order will stipulate, the facts surrounding the issue, proposed solutions, proposed costs
and proposed schedule impacts.
1.10 Special Requirements.
Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof
are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated
herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any
other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern.
A-6
6
ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
2.1 Contract Sum.
Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the
amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and
incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for
actual expenses, shall not exceed $172,798 (One Hundred Seventy Two Thousand, Seven
Hundred Ninety Eight Dollars and Zero Cents) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional
compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.9.
2.2 Method of Compensation.
The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii)
payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services; (iii)
payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of
Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks,
and (b) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the
Schedule of Compensation.
2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.
Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for
reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in
advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5,
and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the
attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City.
Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If
Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant
shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.
2.4 Invoices.
Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice, using the City template,
or in a format acceptable to the City, for all work performed and expenses incurred during the
preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for
payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the
Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the
following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-
contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant
shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.
City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine
whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this
Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant
which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause
Consultant to be paid within 45 (forty-five) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and
A-7
7
undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run
procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the
event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City
to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice
provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided
herein or any applicable law.
2.5 Waiver.
Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be
deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.
ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
3.1 Time of Essence.
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
3.2 Schedule of Performance.
Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a
written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in
the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this
reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the
Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer through a Change
Order, but not exceeding 90 (ninety) days cumulatively.
3.3 Force Majeure.
The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the
services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to
unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant,
including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather,
fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes,
wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant
shall within 10 (ten) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in
writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of
delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when
and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s
determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall
Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of
this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section.
3.4 Term.
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one year
A-8
8
from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit
“D”).
ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK
4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.
The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the
principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the
work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
Erik S. Piller, Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the
foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.
Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for
directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the
services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be
under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the
foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced
by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize
only the personnel included in the Proposal to perform services pursuant to this Agreement.
Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of
Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this
Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors,
if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any
such performance. City shall have the right to approve or reject any proposed replacement
personnel, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
4.2 Status of Consultant.
Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation,
debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless
such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in
writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or
any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers,
employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or
agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may
otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may
have to any such rights.
4.3 Contract Officer.
The Contract Officer shall be Ron Dragoo or such person as may be designated by the
Director of Public Works. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract
Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant
shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise
A-9
9
specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract
Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to
sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this
Agreement.
4.4 Independent Consultant.
Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or
means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except
as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or
control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number,
compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an
independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent
contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any
time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees
of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of
Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise
with Consultant.
4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.
The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and
employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore,
Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services
required hereunder without the express written approval of the City; all subcontractors included
in the Proposal are deemed approved. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein
may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation
of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of
City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons
acting in concert of more 25% (twenty five percent) of the present ownership and/or control of
Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such
unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No
approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability
hereunder without the express consent of City.
ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
5.1 Insurance Coverages.
Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of
any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own
expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts
described below and in a form satisfactory to City.
(a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general
liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in
an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily
A-10
10
injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that
has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language
will not be accepted.
(b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile
insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury
and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with
Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-
owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each
accident.
(c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall
maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection
with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any
policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this
Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than
three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.
(d) Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’
Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at
least $1,000,000).
(e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds
under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated
herein.
(f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required
in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”.
5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to
City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation
endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be
approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification
of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any
time.
(b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder
by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
(c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be
primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required
A-11
11
to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of
primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be
endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-
contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall
be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
(d) City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required
under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced,
City has the right but not the duty to obtain and continuously maintain the insurance it deems
necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will
withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City
may cancel this Agreement.
(e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance
company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance
or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an
assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger)
in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by
the City’s Risk Manager.
(f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured
pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or
appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow
Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to
waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery
against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of
its subconsultants.
(g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant
acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform
Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the
City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
(h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or
limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other
requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific
reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given
issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other
coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums
shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained
by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of
insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
(i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or
broker and insurers to provide to City with a 30 (thirty) day notice of cancellation (except for
nonpayment for which a 10 (ten) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each
required coverage.
A-12
12
(j) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be
endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers
shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any
excess/umbrella liability policies.
(k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages
required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting
endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing.
(l) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for
all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of
liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
(m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants,
subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in
the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements
required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes
all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements
of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants,
subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review.
(n) Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any
time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by
giving the Consultant 90 (ninety) days advance written notice of such change. If such change
results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate
Consultant’s compensation.
(o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to
and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated,
lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these
specifications unless approved by City.
(p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely
notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance
under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required
liability policies.
(q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its
own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be
necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
5.3 Indemnification.
To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will
hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial,
A-13
13
administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs,
penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims
or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in
connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein
of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or
entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or
indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’
negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this
Agreement, and in connection therewith:
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any
of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and
attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its
officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection
with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of
Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and
employees harmless therefrom;
(c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to
any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims
arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work,
operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers,
agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or
employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’
fees.
Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if
it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and
failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This
indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or
omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional
services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring
as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent
permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence,
except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities
arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The
indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive
termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION
6.1 Records.
Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of
accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the
A-14
14
disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as
shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract
Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete
and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all
times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make
records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three
(3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such
records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business,
custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by
Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully
cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is
made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records
Act.
6.2 Reports.
Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports
concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer
shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of
work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees
that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or
will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if
Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall
promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the
estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design
services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.
6.3 Ownership of Documents.
All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes,
computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”)
prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this
Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the
Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim
for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full
rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use,
reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted
documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk
and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to
such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use.
Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall
provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event
Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages
resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may
qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials
are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City.
A-15
15
6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in
performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the
public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such
information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written
authorization from the Contract Officer.
(b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not,
without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City
Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at
depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed
under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary”
provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of
Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City
shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and
fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.
(d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work
performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be
present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully
with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests
provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean
the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION
7.1 California Law.
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to
performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions
concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be
instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other
appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal
jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District
Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los
Angeles, State of California.
7.2 Disputes; Default.
In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall
not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed
A-16
16
after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the
reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the
default. This timeframe is 15 (fifteen) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if
circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold
all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the
alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding
invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take
necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City
to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s
legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
7.3 Retention of Funds.
Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant
(whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in
dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or
damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by
reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s
obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount
or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear
to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for
interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of
City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of
the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.
7.4 Waiver.
Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any
party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other
provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.
Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of
the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by
a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a
waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of
any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this
Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party
of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or
different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the
other party.
7.6 Legal Action.
A-17
17
In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in
equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel
specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain
any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary
provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections
905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.
7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.
This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided
in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this
Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant,
except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be
such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. Upon receipt of any notice of
termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be
specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all
services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services
authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation
or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the
event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the City need not provide the
Consultant with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.
7.8 Termination for Default of Party.
If termination is due to the failure of the other Party to fulfill its obligations under this
Agreement:
(a) City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work
and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable
to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the
compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate
such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off
or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.
(b) Consultant may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, terminate the
Agreement upon written notice to the City‘s Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to
payment for all work performed up to the date of termination.
7.9 Attorneys’ Fees.
If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any
action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such
action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or
equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s
fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other
reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other
necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be
A-18
18
deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or
not such action is prosecuted to judgment.
ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION
8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.
No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any
successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which
may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms
of this Agreement.
8.2 Conflict of Interest.
Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall
acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests
of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this
Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person
having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor
without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times
avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City
in the performance of this Agreement.
No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in
this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the
Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation,
partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any
State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay
or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.
Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons
claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of,
any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual
orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of
this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed
and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed,
religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other
protected class.
8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.
Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection
therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ
such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement,
A-19
19
and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens,
Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or
sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.
ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
9.1 Notices.
Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party
desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either
served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager
and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Rancho
Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 and in the case of
the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this
Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of
address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in
72 (seventy two) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.
9.2 Interpretation.
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the
language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of
this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
9.3 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.
9.4 Integration; Amendment.
This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive
expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements
between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels
any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between
the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification
of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by
the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be
waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
9.5 Severability.
In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or
sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid
judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall
not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this
Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent
A-20
20
of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives
either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.
9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.
No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in
this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision
relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of
any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or
in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly
interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of
“financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be
“remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant
warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party
including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or
other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement.
Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s),
omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money,
consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City
official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any
agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other
conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render
this Agreement void and of no force or effect.
Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______
9.7 Corporate Authority.
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such
party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this
Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally
bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not
violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall
be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
A-21
21
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the date and year first-above written.
CITY:
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES,
a municipal corporation
Eric Alegria, Mayor
ATTEST:
Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
William W. Wynder, City Attorney
CONSULTANT:
BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, INC.
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required
from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2)
Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S
SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE
INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR
OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.
A-22
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On __________, 2021 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: _____________________________________
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER_______________________________
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
___________________________________
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________
DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the
document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
A-23
□ □
□ □ □ □ □ □
□
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On __________, 2021 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: _____________________________________
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER_______________________________
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
___________________________________
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________
DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the
document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
A-24
□ □
□ □ □ □ □ □
□
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
[BEGINS NEXT PAGE]
A-25
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-1
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Project Understanding / Approach
As the City of Rancho Palos Verdes’ (RPV) infrastructure matures, the City’s staff is striving to
update the City’s Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program (PMP) through “triennial”
cost effective condition surveys, engineering cost evaluation, budgetary reporting and data
updates within the
MicroPAVER database. The
City’s 2021 focus for field
pavement/sidewalk
inspections will cover all
defined streets and alleys
within the network (150 miles).
The City requires a team that will not only resurvey the defined sections using cost-conscious
methodologies but will create a comprehensive program that includes the enhancement of your
8-year PMP/ROW CIP, district maintenance evaluation, GIS integration/publication, stewardship
of the PMP, MyRoads™ PMP web-portal, and presentation of PMP/RAMP findings and
recommendations to upper management, City Council and IMAC.
Our firm is in the unique position for this project due to our 2019 PMP and Sidewalk inventories
where we established essential cornerstone data for this project. Bucknam will continue to
provide these services through our proactive and accurate implementation of your PMP; we will
address the City’s primary goals of:
• Updating MicroPAVER with 2021 inspections, work history and maintenance data;
• Surveying 150 miles of Arterial, Collector, Local and Alley streets; provide variance PCI
reporting based upon 2019 PCI’s vs. 2021;
• Verifying / Updating pavement centerline and metric data (PMP vs. GIS) through our AI
AC/PCC SF calculations;
• Generating 2021 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ratings for each segment as well as
additional conditions for assets inventoried under this project;
• Field inspections, investigations and testing of assets (e.g. traffic control elements,
compliance for curb & gutter, guardrails, etc.);
• Developing a proactive preventative slurry seal / overlay maintenance schedules based
on existing capital funding (citywide approach vs. traditional zone cycle schedule);
• Establishing solid recommendations for current / future maintenance needs;
• Utilizing the City’s existing funding to generate a baseline 8-year year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) for all assets evaluated;
• Recommending alternative maintenance budgets that demonstrate realistic return-on-
investments (ROI), i.e. Scenarios 1, 2, 3, “actual” budget model, maintain PCI model, etc.
A-26
Roadway Assets/ Pavement Management Update
Str eets Concre te Medians
Sidew a l ks Guard r a i ls
........ Pa rking. Lots . ( 6 .Loca tions) ........................ Pavem en t .M arki ngs .............. .
Cu rb & Gutter ....... Ro ad way.Signs ................ .
Cu rb Ram p s
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-2
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
We have defined detailed phases to the scope of work in accordance to the City’s RFP;
1. Project Implementation
2. Client Satisfaction
3. Project Schedule (See Section 5)
4. Scope of Work (Major Tasks)
1) Project Implementation
TASK 1.1: Project Kickoff
The first step in implementing a successful pavement management program truly
resides in frequent communication and timely scheduled data updates. For the City of
RPV it will be essential to establish, up front, the Public Works department
(Engineering/Maintenance) pavement management priorities. Our team will set a
Project Kickoff meeting to further discuss and review in detail the expectations of the
project, technical approach, section ID / GIS management & surveys, district/zone
maintenance, roadway asset inventories and condition assessments, software upgrades
& use, deliverables within the scope of work and the review of schedule.
This effort will build consensus between the Public Works and Maintenance staff as well
as build stronger ARTERIAL and LOCAL maintenance programs that complement large
Public Works CIP projects and annual maintenance projects.
Deliverable: Meeting minutes, revised project schedule (if necessary)
TASK 1.2: Project Status Meetings - Quality Control Program
Status Meetings and Progress Reports
• Minimum of four meetings during the project (kickoff, field, and status meetings
– 30%, 65% and 100% ), Field review meetings and bi-weekly progress status
reports will be delivered to City project manager
• We have included our detailed Quality Control Plan within Section 5 of our
proposal
Deliverable: Monthly Project Status reports, field review and project status meetings,
QA/QC Plan
2) Client Satisfaction
TASK 2.1: Project Deliverables
Shown throughout our Scope of Work, each Task is summarized with project
deliverables. Client satisfaction will derive from frequent communication with the
Project Manager and key staff members from the Public Works departments. Project
success is created by delivering on three main factors;
A-27Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-3
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
1) Adherence to scope tasks and deliverables
2) Performing to the standard set by the Project Schedule; and
3) Controlling costs. Our Project Manager will follow each of these factors throughout
the duration of the project
Deliverable: Project Status Updates, as stated in Task 1.2
3) Project Schedule
TASK 3.1: Work Flow / Project Schedule
Per the request of the RFP, we have included the Critical Path Method (CPM) Project Schedule
within Section 4 of our proposal.
4) Scope of Work (Major Tasks)
Roadway Asset / PMP Assessment - PMP Preliminary Investigations
The City will provide the most recent GIS data, shapefiles and existing PMP data which will serve
as the initial dataset to verify and/or update essential PMP and ROW data. Bucknam will assess:
• City’s current RPV 4-18-19.e70 MicroPAVER database;
• Relevant work history data which has occurred since 2019;
• GIS files related to the 2019 PMP and Sidewalk project vs. City current;
• Street and Right-of-Way (Sidewalk) Record drawings; and
• Assess and verify available City data pertaining to parking lots, C&G, concrete medians
and guardrails; (pavement markings and roadway signs optional)
TASK 4.1: Roadway Asset / PMP Work History Update
The City will provide Bucknam a complete listing of all major work (overlay, slurry, etc.) in order
to update specific section work histories and PCI ratings. Bucknam will review all maintenance
and rehabilitation projects completed and/or scheduled by the City since the last update in
2019; this will include work history updates on arterial, locals and alleys.
Our staff will enter the necessary work history updates as mentioned above (i.e. data entry of
maintenance / rehabilitation activities) into your MicroPAVER software. Once the project is
completed, our staff will upload the necessary PMP database files at the City.
Deliverable: Update Roadway / PMP data, Work History report
A-28Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-4
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT/ROADWAY ASSET CONDITION INVENTORYS
TASK 4.2: Conduct Pavement Condition Survey
First and foremost, the assessment of the City’s pavement segmentation is one of the key
priorities for this project. With three years between major inspections it will be essential to
verify that all Arterial, Collector and Local segmentation is up-to-date and that section SF
quantities are verified, accurate and reliable. This will be completed by utilizing the Bucknam-
Fuscoe cloud-based learning technology (AI) to correct quantify square footages for each
pavement section (see sample below).
Bucknam (powered by
Fuscoe’s unique use of
cloud-based learning
technology technology)
allows our staff to
provide the AI with the
City of RPV’s most
recent aerial image; in
doing so, all AC and PCC
pavement areas are
immediately calculated. This instant calculation is possible due to the cloud-based learning
tech’s inherent working knowledge of how to recognize pavement surfaces and asphalt types.
This ability will allow Bucknam to obtain the necessary quality control measurements for all RPV
PMP segments and to perform segment SF variance reports. This will in turn create a more
accurate total centerline / square footage of the RPV network as well as for each unique
pavement segments. Medians can also be identified using this AI technology.
We will review/assess new and/or missing streets previously excluded from the last PMP update
and create the necessary segmentation within the RPV PMP database + GIS links.
Once the pavement segmentation has been assessed and verified, the necessary 150 miles of
Arterial, Collector, Local and Alley inspections will be performed. It is the City’s desire to survey
all pavement sections this fiscal year.
Our survey methodology will include the following approach based on the ASTM D6433
guidelines:
1. Walking - All sections are surveyed through “two-pass test” walking methodologies. AC/PCC
distress types will be collected based upon actual surface conditions and physical
characteristics of the segment.
Surveying methods will be conducted by remaining consistent with ASTM D6433-20 & the
Army Corp of Engineers AC/PCC sampling guidelines while being flexible to current City
requirements.
A-29
1 -01i¥i 11~ ~dll\:in ~,k
,.,,,.illll '-" I.ARIA( A-:1itol i,
ut l l1...-I (.umpl1> t1f!,L:,t..,.
Av1::w/l r wnhlio V:1!ky)
J l'...,,lld b.ir.td , ... ,rni,,e
t r eh.-..'ll(lr,,M.it1:r;:1r-ri.,1
,mi.I gtflCldtc, AC
p,IV,:,n'i1>111 lar-Ari"lt1,.
wl1il i: 11<:l,lll•1:1li~ pee·
l -GIS N,-,un !JI u,,..
l:ity'!\P:,"<"ITW't'lr
,t,g1111,~1h D l~li1...:J •11d
S► ·:: .,IY' l"fl»'rrdNI w ithi,,
Sl1....:L<t,,.,.,,
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-5
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
All sample locations are observed through walking surveys; samples areas will cover a
minimum of 20% of the total section area and will be 2,500 SF +/- 1,000 SF in size.
According to the City’s RFP the following pavement sections are to be surveyed for the
upcoming 2021 PMP update:
• The inspection of approximately 150 centerline miles of Arterial / Collector, Local
and Alley segments will be performed;
• Parking Lots (6 Total, Civic Center, Point Vicente, Fred Hesse, Robert Ryan, Del Cerro
and Eastview);
• Recent overlay rehabilitation will reduce total mileage of survey – TBD;
Our use of Tablet-based units allows our staff to collect pavement data with the City of RPV’s
PMP database live in the field. At the end of the day all electronic data is transferred to our
office for quality control and management.
Roadway Verification Survey - A listing of the field attribute data that is updated/verified during
the survey for the pavement management database is listed below:
2. Field Attribute Data (updated and/or verified)
From/to, indicating the assigned limits of the section, sample test areas, street name
Historical PCI tracking from previous inspections and 2021 PCI inspections
Segment rank, length, width, and total true area of the section
Pavement segment and PCI “Variance” analysis and report
3. Conditional data will be evaluated for all street segments and will include:
MicroPAVER 20 AC & 19 PCC distresses by type, severity and extent
Sampling/conditional data pulled from within edge-of-pavement to edge-of pavement
PCI ratings (0-100), taking into account the surface condition, level of distress
4. Section Distress and PCI Reporting
Upon 50% and 100% completion of the required condition surveys, we will prepare draft PCI
Reports and PCI GIS maps that document the conditions of all pavement segments.
SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT AND CONDITION INVENTORY
TASK 4.2a: Sidewalk / Curb & Gutter / Curb Ramp GIS Digitization
Per the City’s RFP’s request, Bucknam has provided below a detailed Sidewalk-C&G / Curb Ramp
Condition scope of work. Based upon the City’s approximate 150 miles of streets we are
estimating that the City has 220 miles of sidewalks defined within its network (75% of the
network having sidewalks on both sides of the street).
Bucknam will update / establish a clear and accurate citywide Sidewalk / Curb Ramp GIS layer
that represents where known sidewalk locations exist today (polyline based, currently in-hand);
A-30Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-6
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Curb ramps will be point-located. This work effort will include the assessment and improvement
of all existing sidewalk GIS line work, existence/absence of curb ramp locations. This
establishment of the Sidewalk / Curb Ramp GIS layers will in turn drive our conditional
inspections.
Our staff will utilize the City’s available pavement segmentation data, within the RPV pavement
database, to improve upon the sidewalk segmentation, unique sidewalk ID, survey limits and
schedule data. Our staff will utilize additional data such as the City’s GIS centerline, aerial
imagery and other viable data to assist our field operations.
In improving upon the Sidewalk Management Program (SMP) database, sidewalk locations will
be updated/digitized through ArcGIS Desktop utilizing available aerial imagery, completed street
improvement plans and digital roadway imagery. Sidewalk “gaps” will be located/noted.
Sidewalk distress data (trip hazards) will be collected through the use of mobile GPS hand-held
units, providing a XY coordinates for all distress locations. Through the use of our enhanced
ESRI GIS Collector units we utilize the data capture screen to record inventory and inspection
data defined by this scope of work.
Another essential data collection item to establish prior to survey is what defines sidewalk
displacement/trip hazards for potential maintenance and repair. These displacement locations
will be categorized with low, medium or high deficiency ratings. These details are shown within
Tasks 4.2b & 4.2c; as stated above, we will meet with City staff to define the final deficiency
rating definitions prior to survey.
Deliverable: Definition of RPV Sidewalk Section network, inventory attributes, GIS data
integration plan
TASK 4.2b: Update of Sidewalk Maintenance Database
Based on our previous 2019 sidewalk management project as well as our projects performed for
other SoCal cities, we have provided the list below demonstrating typical layers and attributes
collected during sidewalk inspections:
Sidewalk Distresses Attributes / GIS Data
• House Number – House number closest to distress, if applicable;
• Street Name – Street Name;
• Surface Type – i.e. AC, Brick, Paver, PCC;
• Distress Material Location – sidewalk, C&G, Ramp;
• Vertical displacement – i.e. ¼” to 1”, 1” to 2”, 2” or higher
o Displacement ranges – Defined by City’s current Sidewalk Inspection Program
(may be changed per discussions with City);
o Distress Type – i.e. joint faulting, linear cracking, divided slab, buckled slab;
• Sensitive Location – Schools, Parks, City Facilities, etc. Locations to be determined by
City Staff;
• Tree – If distress is caused by a tree;
A-31Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-7
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
• Utility Box – If distress is caused by a utility box;
o Utility label/type, if any;
• Length – Length of distress, if applicable;
• Recommended Work – i.e. Grind, Ramp, Replace;
• MicroPAVER ID – Unique ID that corresponds with PMP Street GIS Layer;
• Any hazards or sidewalk damage that may not meet requirements of repair to be noted
for future inspections;
• Field notes (if applicable) and inspection date associated with distress priority location;
• Comments – Field for any necessary comments about the distress.
We will finalize each GIS layer’s attributes
with the City staff before beginning the
survey process. Bucknam will deliver all GIS
data in the City’s preferred GIS format.
Through our experience in working with
sidewalk GIS datasets and MicroPAVER we
are approaching the development and future
management of the RPV sidewalk
assessment in the following manner:
Sample screenshot of Bucknam’s 2019 Sidewalk
Map Atlas utilized for inspections
Perform all sidewalk data collection/condition assessment through the use of mobile
GPS driven hand-held technologies and personal computers.
o This creates a real-time, accurate GIS database for each distress location
Publish collected sidewalk GIS data into the City’s existing GIS Enterprise for field use,
data analysis, reporting and management
TASK 4.2c: Sidewalk / Curb & Gutter / Curb Ramp Condition Survey
Once the street/pavement segmentation has been assessed and verified, the inspection of
approximately 220 miles of sidewalk segments will be performed. Data will be
assessed/collected by following the pavement segment breakdown established within the PMP;
both sides of the street will be captured. Our survey methodology will include the following
approach:
• FY 2021 – citywide sidewalk, curb & gutter, curb ramp (220 miles);
Distress data collected will utilize the attributes shown within Task 4.2b
A-32
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-8
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
The City has initially identified specific displacement deficiency ranges which are demonstrated
below; any recommended changes to the distress rating limits will be discussed prior to survey:
• Rating 1 – (Fair), Locations that have a condition of Fair to Good or where the problem is
not a safety hazard
o Typically trip, separation, spalling,, raised/depressed slab distress areas that are
¼” to 1” in occurrence;
• Rating 2 – (Poor), Locations that have a condition of Poor or any location which the field
technician considers to be a safety concern
o Typically trip, separation, spalling, raised/depressed slab distress areas that are
1” to 2” in occurrence;
• Rating 3 – (Very Poor), Locations that have a condition of Very Poor or where the field
technician determines that a problem is an immediate safety concern
o Typically trip, separation, spalling, raised/depressed slab distress areas that are
2” or greater in occurrence;
• Rating 4– for “vicinity of a sensitive location” (i.e. schools, churches, hospitals, senior
housing, city facilities, parks, commercial centers, etc.) where pedestrian traffic is high
and the City has a vested interest in lowering tripping hazards.
o Rating can be given for any deficiency location; this places priority onto the
location needing repair due to the pedestrian activity at the site.
We welcome staff members from the City of RPV to join our surveys. Our use of mobile GPS
Handheld/Tablet units allows our staff to collect sidewalk data with the City of RPV’s database
live in the field. At the end of the day all electronic data is transferred to our office for quality
Sidewalk Priority
Distress Locations,
associated with
address and proper
side of street
A-33
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-9
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
control and management. We can produce Sidewalk GIS Distress locations at any time during
the survey for City QC and/or review.
Section Distress and Condition Reporting
At 50% and 100% Bucknam will generate Sidewalk / C&G / Curb Ramp Location/Distress Reports
for City staff review. The City and our staff will review these reports to ensure that all inventory
data is correct and the project is running smoothly.
Sidewalk spreadsheet reports and GIS maps will include:
• Identification of all street segments in a continuous manner (W to E and S to N);
• Sidewalk/C&G/Curb Ramp locations identified within street segments;
• GIS maps identifying sidewalk displacement locations;
• A Sidewalk M&R recommendation map
• Citywide Sidewalk/C&G/Curb Ramp Atlas Book
Deliverable: Citywide ROW Distress Reports (50% and 100% status reports); Recommended
repairs; GIS Distress/Deficiency maps.
REQUESTED ADDITIONAL ASSET DATA COLLECITON
TASK 4.2d: Street Medians and Guardrails Inventory
Per the City’s request, Bucknam has
been asked to digitize found medians
and guardrails throughout the City.
This work will be performed in
conjunction with our PMP/Sidewalk
Inventory processes. By utilizing the
City’s high-resolution aerial imagery,
street-view technology resources,
automated roadway imaging
technology (see image right) and GIS
digitization to collect these street/ROW
assets. Prior to survey all asset attribute definitions/metrics will be submitted to the City for
review and approval. General conditions will be collected during our field inventories and our
findings and recommendations will be submitted as part of the Asset Management Report.
Bucknam will deliver unique median and guardrail GIS layers in ESRI GIS format and ensure that
each layer is published within the City’s GIS Enterprise. General quantity summary findings will
be delivered as well as a citywide traffic control asset map book. Through scope discussions
with City staff, it was decided that the requested sign inventory be shown as an optional service.
In addressing the City’s need to establish a sign assessment / management program, Bucknam is
recommending one or a mixture of management options shown below. In establishing a
A-34
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-10
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
zone/district cycle for sign operations and maintenance similar to the pavement management
zone/district cycle, the City will be able to proactively identify and replace specific signs within a
given geological area. This will provide a solid basis for identifying annual operations and
maintenance needs and costs while proactively replacing City signs.
RFV Sign Inventory Retro-reflectivity Management Evaluation
According to the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, all
agencies are required to implement a sign assessment or management method by June 2014 to
ensure adequate maintenance of minimum levels of sign retroreflectivity. This precedes two
other Federal mandates that agencies must replace traffic signs by 2015 and 2018. However,
under the FHWA May 2012 proclamation regarding the MUTCD, the specific 2015 & 2018
deadlines have been eliminated; local agencies can now replace traffic signs when they are worn
out instead of having to replace them by a specific date. Furthermore, the FHWA has not
lowered the new MUTCD standards, then just removed the deadlines. For RPV, the previous
2016-17 sign inventory effort and delivery will be essential to establish / define a traffic sign
replacement program to ensure that the City is in compliance with the regulatory requirements.
Bucknam Infrastructure Group will provide the City with the most efficient and cost effective
management plan to accomplish these objectives for the City. We will also provide a long term
cost estimate for meeting minimum retroreflectivity requirements.
The MUTCD allows five (5) options for sign retroreflectivity management; two through
assessment efforts and three through management efforts. These methods are Nighttime
Visual Inspection, Measured Sign Retroreflectivity, Expected Sign Life, Blanket Replacement, and
Control Signs. Each agency can choose to use one of these methods or a combination thereof.
Each method carries its own cost-benefit analysis and this will be a part of our discussion
regarding your existing sign inventory data and how we can best use it to manage your program
in the next several years.
Through our discussions, we will recommend the most appropriate MUTCD assessment /
management plan for the City based upon current maintenance strategies, available staff, sign
inventories, and sign attribute records.
DEVELOP RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TASK 4.3: Maintenance & CIP/Budgetary Analysis
We will assist the City in developing the most cost-effective preventative maintenance, repair and
rehabilitation strategies possible. This will be accomplished by meeting with the City to discuss
and strategize maintenance activities that are currently being used by the City. Based on the
City’s current AC & PCC applications, Geotech reports and other maintenance practices used we
will conduct an historical and prospective analysis on the conditional and financial impact these
practices have on the pavement network.
A-35Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-11
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
We will establish/update the RPV MicroPAVER maintenance “decision tree” that will be used to
generate pavement recommendations that match current fiscal year maintenance
approaches/City practices. This will be accomplished by assessing/updating the unique and
individual PCI ranges and deterioration curves within PMP software based on functional class (i.e.
arterial, collector, local) and age. Our staff will review the RPV’s deterioration curves that have
been developed based on historical pavement condition, inspection, surface type, and road class.
All maintenance practices/unit costs will be integrated into the PMP and will be derived from the
most recent construction bids for pavement rehabilitation. We will account for inflation rates
when long-term revenues projections are made. Our Project Manager and Principal will work
closely with City in defining repair and rehabilitation strategies for each fiscal year as well as
establish PMP zones for the street/alley networks. Once the repair/rehabilitation strategies have
been defined, the identification of a five year Forecasted Maintenance schedule will be generated.
The recommended budget scenarios will be identified on the basis of several criteria:
• Assessment and review of the City’s Pavement CIP
• Present pavement conditions; Desired levels of service and available resources
• Projected / Forecasted PCI’s per section
• Cost benefit of individual strategies (minimum of three (3) scenarios)
• Scheduling with the City’s major CIP projects (water, sewer, etc.)
• Budgetary recommendations that satisfy METRO guidelines
• Local “Neighborhood” fiscal year reporting/improvement scheduling
• Future routine maintenance needs based on projected deterioration rates
The primary emphasis of this task is to maximize the scheduling of street maintenance using the
most cost-effective strategies available and taking into account a life-cycle cost analysis.
TASK 4.4: Asset Management / Pavement Management Reports
Pavement Management Report
We will deliver the Final Report to the City which will be essential for staff reference / use as
well as presented in a way that is beneficial for elected officials/upper management. This
report will assist the City in complying with METRO.
The report will be prepared in a format that uses the information delivered by the PMP
database in conjunction with the information and analysis performed by our team. The report
will provide the City with information on:
Current inventory and pavement conditions indices (PCI) for all road classes
Projected annual rehabilitation programs for street maintenance for a 8-yr period
(ARTERIAL, LOCAL and ALLEY Forecast Maintenance Reports) that show the largest
return on investment and acceptable levels of service;
Modeling and comparison of at least three (3) budget scenarios that typically include:
A-36Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-12
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Comparison of citywide M&R approach to City’s traditional zone rotation schedule;
Future PMP conditions based upon historical funding levels;
Identification of annual funding to maintain current after 8-years;
Increase current PCI within 8-years;
Gradual, Frontloaded, Constrained and Unlimited funding analysis;
Strategies and recommendations for the City’s maintenance programs and
procedures, including a preventative maintenance schedule;
Publication of multiple budget scenarios within MyRoads™ (Bucknam web-
portal/dashboard);
Supporting documentation required by METRO;
A detailed breakdown of deferred maintenance (backlog); and
Quality Management Plan document.
Our recommendations will provide guidance to the City on how to implement better
preventative maintenance / rehabilitation strategies and/or increase funding through PMP data
examples. We will make a presentation of the results from the 2021 PMP update to City
personal and/or City Council if necessary-pro bono.
Asset Management Report
Additionally, the City has asked for the generation of a revised Asset Management Program
Report. This will be created and produced based on our findings and recommendations for the
assets described throughout of scope of work. Our efforts will include:
• Revised Asset Management Report and PMP Report after City comments
• Presentation of reports to the City leadership including preparation of materials
• Revised Asset Management Report and PMP Report after leadership comments
• Presentation of report, including development of Staff Report and presentation materials to Infrastructure Management Advisory Committee (IMAC)
• Revised Asset Management Report and PMP Report after IMAC comments
• Presentation of report to the City Council
• Revised Asset Management Report and PMP Report after CC comments
• Delivery of Final Asset Management Report and PMP Report (signed by Bucknam’s Civil Engineer (Mr. Steve Bucknam)
• Delivery of final GIS files for each asset class including final condition assessment
Registered Engineer
Mr. Steve Bucknam, P.E. will review all completed data and sign a final Asset Management and
PMP reports incorporating the results of our pavement evaluation and conditions. We will
A-37Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-13
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
provide recommendations for pavement rehabilitation and replacement design based upon
field data and analysis.
TASK 4.5: PMP Mapping and GIS Update
As an enhancement and proactive
approach to this project, our staff will
update and publish a Pavement-GIS
link between the PMP database and
the City’s GIS system. Bucknam will
utilize the City’s existing 2019 PMP-
GIS layer for updating all essential
data to the layer. By using the unique
segment ID’s within the PMP and the
City’s ESRI street shapefile ID’s, we
will verify a one-to-one match for
each pavement section in the GIS. All
pavement segmentation within the
PMP database will be mirrored within
the RPV GIS layer which will allow all
pavement data to be published on the GIS layer. With a completed survey and we will update
the PMP-GIS layer with all final PCI data.
The maps described below will be incorporated into the City’s Final PMP report:
• PCI values for every section; Work History identifications; 8-yr proposed Arterial /
Local Rehabilitation and Slurry Seal Programs; and Functional classification maps
Our staff will coordinate all project deliveries with the Public Works and the GIS division to
ensure that the most current and accurate PMP-GIS maps are represented within the City’s GIS
enterprise. Bucknam’s 2019 RPV PMP-GIS map shown above.
TASK 4.6: PMP / GIS Training
With PMP software use being one of the key components to a successful PMP implementation,
we will provide City staff with quality, certified training and the necessary skills needed to
maintain the PMP. Bucknam will provide City staff with all collected pavement/GIS data, as well
as updated operation manuals for both field data collection and software use.
A-38
~·"'·"''"' -«, 1·r,;.,.._r.......-,,
_,., ~~,'.'NJ,'
_,,,::,,\,,,
-11 ,r ,?,,J •~. C :•:C) :i::(~
----•t !'I
\"· ~-'· . -;: ----'\~ )i·1~·t_·:~-:
~"-•:---:• ... , . : .,. .. ..
,. .. ,,
:,w -•-:.. ---
"' -··r
I~'\_~\
.;,';, --j . . ~---r
··-,· ·. l jf • t·~· i j. "'-~:.:.
, ---·1-j.-I •vi
·a ... , ............ , .. . .. ,,~,
... , ,,,_,, • ., ~--. ,,n ..
f n"?,,:~".,~: ••
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-14
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
TASK 4.7: RPV MyRoads™ PMP Web-Portal
RPV MyRoads™ Web-Portal – Bucknam’s
proprietary option of MyRoads™ is a great match
for the RPV PMP today and the future. This
option brings your PMP data to life within a
dynamic PMP dashboard!
Bucknam now provides all our PMP clients with a
unique and agency driven “MyRoads™” web-
portal that provides instantaneous access to
your pavement management database. This
“dashboard” allows users to toggle through
individual sections via GIS mapping selections,
zone queries, rank selection, PCI ranges, etc. to
review all section metrics, latest/previous
inspections, work histories generate filtered PCI
reports and identify potential maintenance costs
based upon your unique needs.
Bucknam has shown above the RPV MyRoads™
account actively working! This tool will be
accessed by City staff simply through a
Username/Password methodology. As changes are made to the RPV PMP database the
MyRoads™ dataset is changed to reflect work history edits, PCI inspections and section changes.
In summary, MyRoads™ allows the user perform the following dynamic functions:
• Query specific pavement segment(s) to view current/historic PCI, work history
inspection;
• Filter for pavement sections within a defined zone, PCI range and/or functional class;
• Select a pavement section or grouping of section through the on-board GIS tool;
• Enter slurry, overlay & reconstruction unit costs to determine preliminary cost of
maintenance and resulting citywide PCI
o Display critical street / sidewalk / ROW assets along pavement section(s) that
are critical to Engineering Bid development and solicitation (curb ramps,
utilities, manholes, trees, etc.
• Displays all final GIS project maps (PCI, work history, 8-yr forecasted maintenance, etc.)
• Bucknam will train RPV staff on the simply use of the MyRoads™ dashboard
A-39
••• ,.....,
"
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA
2021 Pavement Management Program Update
Cost Proposal - October 27, 2021
Description Principal Project
Manager GIS Planner Field
Technician(s)Admin Total by Task
Base Fee $295/hr $185/hr $145/hr $96/hr $80/hr
Task 1 Kick-off Meeting PMP Services
Task 1.1 Project Kick-off 2 1 $515
Task 1.2 Project Status Meetings - Quality Control Program 4 4 64 $7,464
Quality Control efforts cover PMP, SMP and ROW asset efforts q
Task 2 Client Satisfaction
Task 2.1 Project Deliverables 1 4 4 2 1 $1,887
Task 3 Project Schedule
Task 3.1 Work Flow / Project Schedule 2 3 8 3 $2,153
Task 4 Scope of Work
Task 4.1 Roadway Asset / PMP Work History Update
Pavement Work History Data Entry 1 1 16 $1,866
Task 4.2 Pavement Inspection Surveys (150 miles) - Volume discount due to previous 2018 inspection services
Arterial, Local and Alley Street Survey (Walking survey)1 8 6 188 2 $20,853
Task 4.2a Sidewalk / Curb & Gutter / Curb Ramp Condition Survey (220 miles)
Update of Sidewalk Inspection Criteria 1 3 2 2 $1,332
Task 4.2b Update of Sidewalk Management Database 2 12 12 $3,262
Task 4.2c Perform Sidewalk / Curb & Gutter / Curb Ramp Survey (Bucknam)
Sidewalk Location / Distress Inventory (Bucknam)1 14 8 280 1 $31,005
C&G / Curb Ramp Digital Image Inventory - Task 4.2c (RAS)$17,595
Task 4.2d Requested Additional Asset Data Collection
Digital Roadway Imaging Set-up, Mobilization and Network Drive (RAS)$36,558
Guardrails / Median Digital Image Inventory - Task 4.2d (RAS)$10,350
Retroreflectively Assessment and Recommendations for O&M $2,960
Task 4.3 Maintenance & CIP / Budgetary Analysis 4 12 4 $3,784
Task 4.4 Asset Management / Pavement Management Reports 4 68 16 24 1 $18,464
Task 4.5 PMP Mapping and GIS Update
PMP / Sidewalk / GIS Layers Update/Publication 1 3 16 10 $4,130
Task 4.6 PMP / GIS Training 1 3 $620
Task 4.7 RPV MyRoads PMP Web-Portal $1,200
Reimbursables (printing, materials, mileage)$6,800
All deliverables will become property of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes
All Tasks are negotiable
Total Hours per Staff 15 125 73 610 8
Total Base Fee 4,425$ 23,125$ 10,585$ 58,560$ 640$ $172,798
Optional Services
Task 4.2 AC/PCC Cloud-based AI SF calculation $8,300
Task 4.2d Pavement Markings / Striping Inventory Digital Image Inventory - Task 4.2d (RAS)$24,150
*Notes / Assumptions:
Task 4.2 - Digital Roadway Imaging drive miles equates to driving Arterial/Collector road with two passes and Locals with one pass
Task 4.2a - Bucknam-RAS assumes inventory exists for majority of sidewalk, curb ramps and medians
Task 4.5 - Bucknam assumes City has ArcGIS Server 10.3.1 & ArcGIS 10.3.1 Desktop Standard or higher
Task 4.5 - Bucknam will provide final GIS .mpk, .mxd and shapefiles to City GIS staff for publishing within GIS Enterprise
Task efforts associated with RAS include 15% Bucknam markup
Additional services outside of this contract will be negotiated with the City where we will use the Standard Hourly Rate Schedule
7-2 Revised 11-18-21A-403548 Seagate Way, Suite 230
Oceanside, CA 92056
T: (760) 2 16·6S29
www.bucknam-lnc.com
~
Roadway Asset Management Program and Pavement Management System Update
Section I - Scope of Work:
The CONSULTANT (Roadway Asset Services, LLC.) shall provide the following services to the OWNER (City of
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA):
• Mobile data collection and roadway imagery for 150 centerline miles
• Right-of-way (ROW) asset inventory and condition assessment for assets maintained by the City
Description of the tasks to be performed.
1. Task 1 – Field Set-Up, Mobilization, & GPS Network Creation
1.1 Project Initiation
Upon notice to proceed the CONSULTANT will arrange a kick-off meeting to confirm the project
requirements and scheduling. The kick-off meeting will include proposed key personnel and the
OWNER’s project members. During the meeting, CONSULTANT will present the proposed Project
Approach, which includes project equipment, software, methodology, schedules, and deliverables. The
proposed approach will be finalized based on the OWNER requirements and decisions during the
meeting. CONSULTANT will request that the OWNER provide any existing database, previous inventory
of street conditions, road centerlines, Geographic Information System (GIS) layers, and aerial imagery
for project use. Project communication protocol, documentation, accounting methodologies, data
format, and will be confirmed during the meeting.
1.2 GPS Network Creation
CONSULTANT will use the existing centerline data provided by the OWNER and create an asset database
based on the centerline layer. Each road segment record in the centerline layer will have a
corresponding record in the asset database. The OWNER represents that the City maintains
approximately 150 centerline miles of roadway.
CONSULTANT will work with the OWNER to maintain the unique identifier of each of the road segments
on the OWNER road network so that the asset database can maintain a persistent link to the GIS data.
CONSULTANT will provide the OWNER with a GPS “breadcrumb” file of data
collection routes and image locations.
1.3 System Setup and Mobilization
CONSULTANT will work with the OWNER to review and verify that the data is ready to proceed.
1.4 Project Management
CONSULTANT will provide project management for the duration of the project, including coordinating
and attending meetings via web meetings or in person with OWNER, data research and collection
efforts as required, preparing monthly progress reports, and schedule updates.
Task 1 Deliverables:
1. The CONSULTANT will deliver weekly progress reports and schedule updates.
2. The CONSULTANT will provide the CITY with a centerline assessment document for review and
approval.
A-41
2. Task 2 – Collect Street Network
The CONSULTANT will collect roadway data and images for the OWNER’s 150 centerline miles of
roadway using a data collection vehicle.
2.1 Roadway Image Capture
The RAS team consists of a driver and operator
(CONSULTANT) who will systematically drive the
automated data collection vehicle on the road
segment listings provided by the OWNER. The
CONSULTANT will collect asset data with
two-way roads receiving two passes and one-way
roads receiving a single pass per lane.
CONSULTANT proposes to use its collection
vehicle line scan camera with laser illumination
and right-of-way cameras to capture ROW images
to be used during the asset rating process.
Unpaved roads will not be surveyed.
Roadway Asset Services (RAS) will perform paved roads data field collection using a state-of-the-
art International Cybernetics Corporation (ICC) data collection vehicle with following systems
mounted:
• Right-of-way georeferenced images with Ladybug 5+ camera: Forward, Left, Right, and 360-
degree spherical images
• Differentially-corrected GPS (DGPS) with an accuracy of +/- 2 feet
• Applanix POS/LV 220 to compensate for difficult GPS conditions in urban environments
The RAS system collects all right-of-way images, IMU, and DMI data concurrently.
Task 2 Deliverables:
1. CONSULTANT will provide Right-of-Way imagery for all segments collected.
3. Task 3 Curb and Gutter Inventory
CONSULTANT’s ROW collection vehicles will collect right-of-way asset inventories. The vehicles will capture
images at an interval of approximately 10 to 15 feet for both forward and side-facing directions and geo-
referenced to the asset inventory by segment. CONSULTANT will collect the curb and gutter with the following
attributes:
A-42
Curb and Gutter Attributes (Linear Feature):
• AssetID
• Location (Street Name asset located on)
• Photo Image link
• Physical Condition Rating
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
• Painted Color
o None
o Yellow
o Red
o Green
o Blue
o Other
• Comments
TASK 3 Deliverables:
1. CONSULTANT will deliver a Curb and Gutter Inventory with attributes identified above in a linear
GIS file geodatabase
5. Task 5 Curb Ramps Inventory
CONSULTANT’s ROW collection vehicles will collect right-of-way
asset inventories. The vehicles will capture images at an interval of
approximately 10 to 15 feet for both forward and side-facing
directions and geo-referenced to the asset inventory by segment.
CONSULTANT will collect the following:
Ramps Attributes (Point Feature):
• AssetID
• X,Y Location
• Intersection (Street Name + Cross Street Name asset located on)
• Photo Image link
• Physical Condition Rating
o Good = ramp is level with no uprooting or cracking
o Fair = ramp has minimal uprooting or cracking
o Poor = ramp has major uprooting or cracking and poses a hazard to pedestrians
• Truncated Dome
o Yes
o No
• Comments
TASK 5 Deliverables:
1. CONSULTANT will deliver a Ramp Inventory with attributes identified above in a GIS Point file
geodatabase
A-43
6. Task 6 Concrete Medians Inventory
CONSULTANT’s ROW collection vehicles will collect right-
of-way asset inventories. The vehicles will capture
images at an interval of approximately 10 to 15 feet for
both forward and side-facing directions and geo-
referenced to the asset inventory by segment.
CONSULTANT will collect the following:
Public Right of Way Mapping Attributes (Polygon
Features)
• AssetID
• Location (Street Name public right-of-way
located on)
• Photo Image link
• Physical Condition Rating
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
• Comments
TASK 6 Deliverables:
1. CONSULTANT will deliver a public right of way area inventory with attributes identified above
in a GIS file geodatabase.
7. Task 7 Guardrails Inventory
CONSULTANT’s ROW collection vehicles will collect right-of-way asset inventories. The vehicles will capture
images at an interval of approximately 10 to 15 feet for both forward and side-facing directions and geo-
referenced to the asset inventory by segment. CONSULTANT will collect the following:
Guardrail attributes (Linear Feature):
• AssetID
• Type
o Bike/Pedestrian Rail
o Cable
o Concrete Barrier
o Other
o W-Beam
• Condition
o Good – no visible damage
o Fair – visible minor damage such as small piece dented
o Poor – visible damage caused by vehicle impact, section twisted/bent/down
A-44
• End Treatment Type
• Location (Street Name asset located on)
• Photo Image link
• Length
TASK 7 Deliverables:
1. CONSULTANT will deliver a guardrail
inventory with attributes identified
above in a GIS file geodatabase
8. Task 8 Pavement Striping Inventory (Optional)
CONSULTANT’s ROW collection vehicles will collect right-of-way asset inventories. The vehicles will capture
images at an interval of approximately 10 to 15 feet for both forward and side-facing directions and geo-
referenced to the asset inventory by segment. CONSULTANT will collect the following:
Pavement Striping Attributes (Linear Feature):
• AssetID
• X,Y Location
• Location (Street Name asset located on)
• Photo Image link
• Type
o Continuous Left
o Double
o Hash
o Solid
o Stop Bar
o Skip
o Diagonal
o Crosswalk
o Other
• Striping Color
o White
o Yellow
o Red
o Green
o Blue
o Other
• Physical Condition Rating
o Good – No cracking visible and not faded
o Fair – Minor cracking and minor fading present
A-45
o Poor – Needs immediate
replacement. Not visible from the
vehicle.
• Length
• Comments
TASK 8 Deliverables:
1. CONSULTANT will deliver a
pavement striping inventory
including crosswalks with attributes
identified above in a GIS file
geodatabase
8. Task 8 Pavement Markings Inventory (Optional)
CONSULTANT’s ROW collection vehicles will collect right-of-way asset inventories. The vehicles will capture
images at an interval of approximately 10 to 15 feet for both forward and side-facing directions and geo-
referenced to the asset inventory by segment. CONSULTANT will collect the following:
Pavement Marking Attributes (Point Feature):
• AssetID
• X,Y Location
• Location (Street Name asset located on)
• Photo Image link
• Type
o Left Arrow
o Right Arrow
o Straight Arrow
o ONLY
o SCHOOL
o XING
o STOP
o AHEAD
o BUS
o Left-thru Arrow
o Right-thru Arrow
o Bike Icon
o BIKE
o ENDS
o LANE
o Bike Diamond
o Bike Arrow
o Merge Left Arrow
o Merge Right Arrow
A-46
o Speed Hump Arrow
o Speed Hump Block
o SLOW
o Left/Right Arrow
o Unknown
• Marking Color
o White
o Yellow
o Green
o Other
• Physical Condition Rating
o Good – No cracking visible and not faded
o Fair – Minor cracking and minor fading present
o Poor – Needs immediate replacement. Not visible from the vehicle.
• Comments
TASK 8 Deliverables:
1. CONSULTANT will deliver a pavement marking inventory with attributes identified above in a
GIS file geodatabase
Bucknam applied a 15% markup to the above RAS fees, shown within base fee submittal (7-Proposed Fee 11-
18-21 rev2).
A-47
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 1US Roadway Asset Management Program and Pavement Management System Update ---
ROW Asset Inventory
Tas k Desc ri ption Uni ts Uni t Cost Fee
1 Fi eld Set -U p, Mobi li za t ion, & GPS Net wo rk Cr ea t i on (lum p sum)1 1 $8,750 $8,750
2 Collect St r eet N etwork (Test M il es )' 192 $120 $23,040
3 Cu rb an d Gu tter Invent ory (Lane Miles) 300 $45 $13,500
4 Si d e w alks I nvent ory (Lane M il es)' -Task not sele ct e d by the City 60 $0 $0
5 Cu rb Ramps I nvent o ry (Lane Mi les )' 60 $30 $1,800
6 Concret e M e di ans Invent ory (Lan e Miles)' 60 $25 $1,500
7 Guard rai l s Invent ory (Lane Miles) 300 $25 $7,500
8 Pavement Ma rkings & St r i pi ng Invent ory (Lane M iles) -Opti ona l 300 $70 $21,000
9 Roa d way Signs Invent ory (Lane M i l es) -Tas k not se l ected by t he City 300 $0 $0
Tot al Fee ' $77,090
1Ass umes ce nt e rli ne fil e w ill be provid e d in G IS.
2Test Miles e qu ate to d r ivi ng Arteria l a nd Co ll ector roa ds wit h two passes a nd Res ide nt ia l wit h one pas.s
3Ass umes i nv ent ory ex ists for maj ority of t he network w i t h app r ox i mately 20% gr owth of new networ k r equ i r i ng asset i nv entory i nformati o n
4 Bill Mo nt h ly, l u mp s um ba se d o n percent complete for eac h t as k item.
~\', I i-----J=::t: I HI= I I 11 I >-----------=-= 'R,IS ~ 'I I F---I I I ~ ~ 1
,, 1 1'~~ ---
B-1
EXHIBIT “B”
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)
Added text indicated in bold italics, deleted text indicated in strikethrough.
[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
A-48
C-1
EXHIBIT “C”
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
A-49
Tosk 1
Task 1 .1
Task 1 .2
IT ••k 2
Task 2..1
IT •sk3
Task 3 .1
1Tosk4
Task 4.1
Task 4.2
Tas k 4.2 a
Tas k 4.2b
Task 4.2c
Tas k 4.2d
Task 4.3
Task 4.4
Task 4.5
Task 4.6
Task 4.7
Task 4.2
Tas k 4.2d
Project Field Desaipt:ion Pnn[;lpal GISPlilnner Admm
Manager Tec:hmcian[sJ
Ba se Fee S29 S/hr S18S/hr S14S/hr S96/hr SSO/hr
Kick-off Meeting PMP Servic es
Proiect Kick-off 2 1
Proiect Status Meetin"'s -Qua litv Control P.-oe:ra m 4 4 64
Quall tv C.o ntrol efforts cover PM P SM P an d ROW a ss.et e·ff orts •
Cli ent Satisfaction
Project Oeliv e rable.s 1 4 4 2 1
Project Sc hedul e
Wort Flow / Pro ject Sche d ule 2 3 8 3
Scope of Work
Road w ay Ass et/ PMP Work History Update
Pa vement Wo rk His t orv Oata Entrv 1 1 16
Pavement Inspecti o n Surveys {1 50 mil e s) -Vo lume discou nt due t o previous 2018 inspection servic.es
Arteria l, Lo cal a nd All e y Street Surve y (Wa lking s urvey) 1 8 6 1 88
Sidew alk / Cu r b & Guner / Curb Ramp Co ndition Survey (220 mil es)
Update of Sidewa lk Inspection Criteri a 1 3 2 2
Uodate of Side wa lk M anaeement Databa se 2 12 12
Perform Sidewalk / Curb & Gutter / Cur b Ramp Survev (Bu ck nam }
Sid ewa lk Loca tion/ Dist ress Invent ory (Bu cknam } 1 14 8 280
C&G I Curb Ra m n m m a l lma~e lnvent orv -Tas k 4 .2c IRAS l
Requested Add iti onal Asset Data Co ll ection
Oig:ita l Ro adway Im aging: Set -up, Mo biliza t ion a nd Netwo rk Drive {RAS )
Gu a rd ra ils / Me<l ia n Digita l Im age Inve nt ory -Task 4.2d (RAS}
Ret ro reflective ly Asse.ssme nt a nd Recomm e ndatio ns for O&M
Maintenance & CIP / Budgetary An alysis 4 12 4
As set Managemen t/ Pavement Ma n agement Reports 4 68 16 24
PM P Mapping and GIS Updote
PMP' /Sidewa lk / GIS Lavers Undat e/Pu bl icatio n 1 3 16 10
PM P / GIS Tr ai ning 1 3
RPV MyRoads PMP Web-Po rta l
Reimbu.-sables (pri nting, m ate ria ls., mileage}
All deliverables will become prorM>rtv of t he Citv of Rancho P'a los Ve rd es
All Tasks a re nee-ot iable
To ta l Hours pe r Staff 15 125 73 610
Tota l Base Fee s 4,425 s 23,125 s 10,585 s 58,560 s
Optional Servic es
AC/PC C Cloud.,based Al SF calc ulatio n
Pavement Ma rki ngs / St ripi n,g: Inventory Digital Image Inventory -Ta sk 4.2d (RAS}
Additiona servi ces outside of this contract wi ll be negotia t ed with t he City w here we will u se th e Standard Hourty Ra te Sch e du le
*Notes / Assumptions.:
Task 4.2 -Dig ita l Roa dway lm agin,g driv e mile.s equat es t o driv in g Arte ri al/Co ll ector roa d with two pass es a nd Locals with o ne pass
Task 4 .2a -Buckn a m4 RAS assumes inventory exists for m ajority of sidewa lk, curb ra mps a nd me dia ns
Task 4.5 -Bu cknam assume s City has ArcG 1S Server 10 . .3 .1 & ArcG ts 10 .3 .1 Des ktop Sta nda rd or hig her
Task 4 .5 - Bucknam w ill provide fi na l GIS .mpk, .mxd and sh a pefi le.s t o City GIS st.lff for p ub lishing within GIS Enterprise
Task efforts as soci at ed w ith RAS include 15'Hi Buckna m ma rk u p
2
1
1
8
640
Tolill by Task
$515
S7 464
Sl,887
S2,1 53
Sl 866
S20,853
Sl ,332
S3 262
$3 1 005
$17 595
$36,558
Sl0,350
S2,960
S3,7 84
SlB,464
S4 130
$620
Sl ,200
S6,800
~172,798
$8300
$24,1 50
I-
D-1
EXHIBIT “D
SCHEDULE
Draft Report Final Report
Pavement Management System – triennial update 3/1/2022 5/1/2022
Sidewalks Assessment 3/1/2022 5/1/2022
Guardrail Assessment 3/1/2022 5/1/2022
Traffic Signs Assessment (Retroreflectivity) 3/1/2022 5/1/2022
A-50
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 1 of 12
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Request for Proposals
ROADWAY ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
AND PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
UPDATE
Public Works Department
Attention: James O'Neill, Project Manager
30940 Hawthorne Blvd, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Phone: (310) 544-5247 | Email: joneill@rpvca.gov
RFP Release Date: September 8, 2021
Request for Clarification Deadline: September 24, 2021
RFP Submittal Deadline: October 6, 2021
B-1Pl
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 2 of 12
ROADWAY ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND PAVEMENT
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes is requesting proposals from qualified
consulting firms to prepare the City’s Roadway Asset Management
System and Tri-Annual Pavement Management System Update.
All correspondence and questions regarding this RFP should be submitted via
email to:
James O'Neill, Project Manager
Email: joneill@rpvca.gov
To be considered for this project, submit an electronic copy of the proposal to the
above email address by 4:30PM, on October 6, 2021
B-2
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 3 of 12
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction Page 4
II. Project Objective Page 4
III. Project Description and Background Page 4
IV. Scope of Services Page 5
V. Preliminary Project Schedule Page 7
VI. Necessary Qualifications and Submittal
Requirements Page 8
VII. Submission of Proposal Page 9
VIII. Evaluation and Selection Process Page 10
IX. Attachments
Attachment A – Current Pavement Management Program Report
Attachment B – Sample Professional Services Agreement
B-3
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 4 of 12
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes (City) is a scenic, upscale, residential coastal
community, with a population of approximately 42,000, located on the Palos Verdes
Peninsula of southwestern Los Angeles County.
The City is a contract city, meaning that some services are provided by contract with
agencies (both public and private) and some services are delivered by the City’s own
employees.
City Government: Rancho Palos Verdes is a General Law City and has operated under
the Council-Manager form of government since its incorporation in 1973. Policy-making
and legislative authority are vested in the governing City Council, which consists of five
Council Members, including the Mayor and Mayor Pro-Tem. The City is fiscally sound and
functions on an annual budget cycle.
Every three (3) years, a comprehensive pavement management update is performed to
optimize maintenance programming, for the City Streets Network, and to qualify the City
for receipt of Proposition C revenues. In additional to this triennial update, the City is
seeking to implement a Roadway Asset Management Program for roadways and
associated infrastructure.
The purpose of this document is to provide proposers with the information needed to
submit a proposal for review by the City and, if selected, enter into a Professional Service
Agreement with the City. Enclosed is a blank Professional Services Agreement form for
proposers’ review.
II. PROJECT OBJECTIVE
The City is requesting proposals from qualified consulting firms to create a Roadway
Asset Management Program (RAMP) and update the Pavement Management Program
(PMP) to reflect the current conditions of the City’s roadways. The last update to the PMP
was performed in 2019.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
This project will consist of a condition assessment to form the basis of a recommended
schedule for rehabilitation, repair, and maintenance of the City’s roadway infrastructure.
This project will also formally update the PMP for compliance with requirements of the
Metropolitan Transit Authority (Metro) for the City to continue to receive Proposition C
funding.
IV. SCOPE OF SERVICES
B-4
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 5 of 12
The City is accepting proposals for consulting services to develop a recommended
schedule for rehabilitation, repair and maintenance of the following asset classes for all
public roadways (arterial, collector, and local):
Pavement (also including parking lots at Civic Center, Point Vicente Interpretive
Center, Fred Hesse Jr Community Park, Robert E Ryan Community Park, Del
Cerro Park and Eastview Park)
Curb and gutter
Sidewalks
Curb ramps
Concrete medians
Guardrails
Pavement markings
Roadway signs
SCOPE OF WORK
The Scope of Work includes the following for each asset class by component; with the
components break-down to be approved by the City:
1. Condition Assessment– including all necessary field inspections, investigations and
testing of components e.g. testing of traffic signs for retroreflectivity, determination of
compliance with standards for curb ramps and guardrails, etc. This work shall also
include any preliminary investigations including, but not limited to, reviewing
information on previously completed, relevant Capital Improvement Plan projects,
and the current Pavement Management Program.
2. Condition Rating- rating the condition of each asset, by component. This work
includes developing relevant metrics based on best practices, with input from City
staff. The metric for pavements shall be a Pavement Condition Index.
3. Determination of Recommended Rehabilitation, Repair, or Maintenance Activity
based on industry best practices; and a categorization of the basis for recommended
treatment such as safety, code compliance, regulatory compliance, functionality,
preventative maintenance to extend useful life, etc.
4. Prioritization of Recommended Rehabilitation, Repair, or Maintenance Activity that
considers options for minimizing cost and maximizing effectiveness of maintenance
and repair projects; and, for pavement, including a comparison of those
recommendations to the City’s historical practice of an area rotation based on an
eight (8) year cycle, and commenting on the preferred approach from a life-cycle
cost perspective.
B-5
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 6 of 12
5. Cost Estimates for each recommended rehabilitation, repair, or maintenance activity,
including soft costs, contingencies and escalation; and a life-cycle dollar value of
benefit derived from each replacement, rehabilitation, repair, or maintenance activity
(“A” extends the life of a component by “X” years such that replacement only needs
to occur once in a period of “Y” years instead of twice; with a capital outlay savings
of “Z”).
6. Recommended Schedule for completion of all recommended treatments based on
cost constraints provided by the City; and a recommended schedule for condition re-
assessment for each component of each asset class.
Consultant shall complete all necessary project management and support services to
manage, control, track, and report on the progress of work and expenditures, coordinate
and manage subconsultants, implement quality control measures, and coordinate with
the City and other stakeholders.
Consultant shall complete other tasks deemed necessary for the accomplishment of a
complete and comprehensive outcome as described in the project objective. Consultant
shall expand on the above-noted tasks, where appropriate, and provide suggestions
which might lead to efficiencies and enhance the results or usefulness of the work.
Deliverables
As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work
products to the City.
1. Project Schedule
2. Bi-Weekly Status Reports
3. Minutes from all project meetings
4. Draft Asset Management Program Report for each asset class and a separate
Pavement Management System Update Report including the following:
a. Results of condition assessment in table and map format
i. Narrative explaining the methodology used to arrive at condition
metrics
ii. Definitions and explanation for metrics
iii. Comparison of PCI for each segment to that from the previou s PCI,
with explanation of likely cause for significant differences
iv. Narrative explaining results
b. Recommended rehabilitation, repair, or maintenance activity by
component for each asset class, and categorized treatment by
recommendation basis
c. Prioritization of recommended treatment for each asset class
i. Comparison of City-wide pavement management approach to the
City’s traditional area rotation approach
d. Cost estimate for each recommended treatment
B-6
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 7 of 12
i. Life cycle dollar value of benefit received from each treatment
e. Recommended schedule for completion of all treatments based on City-
provided cost constraints and a recommended schedule for condition re-
assessment for each component of each asset class
f. Recommended schedule for completion of all treatments when
considering benefits of including multiple asset classes into combined
projects
5. Revised Asset Management Program Report and Pavement Management
System Update Report after Staff comments
6. Presentation of Asset Management Program Report and Pavement Management
System Update Report to City leadership including preparation of presentation
materials
7. Revised Asset Management Program Report and Pavement Management
System Update Report after City leadership comments
8. Presentation of Asset Management Program Report and Pavement Management
System Update Report, including development of Staff Report and presentation
materials to
a. Infrastructure Management Advisory Committee (IMAC)- 2 meetings
9. Revised Asset Management Program Report and Pavement Management
System Update Report after IMAC comments
10. Presentation of Asset Management Program Report and Pavement Management
System Update Report including development of Staff Report and presentation
materials to City Council (optional task at City’s discretion)
11. Revised Asset Management Program Report and Pavement Management
System Update Report after City Council Comments (optional task at City’s
discretion)
12. Final Asset Management Program Report and Pavement Management System
Update Report signed and sealed by a Consultant Registered Civil Engineer
13. GIS file for each asset class including final condition assessment
City staff may request that check-sets or working versions of documents be submitted
for ongoing routine review. City staff will review all deliverables, including preparatory or
record materials for service deliverables, and provide comments. Consultant is required
to revise draft deliverables to address City staffs’ comments.
B-7
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 8 of 12
V. PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE
A. RFP Schedule
The following is the anticipated schedule for the RFP process:
Request for Proposal available September 8, 2021
Request for Clarification due September 24, 2021
Proposals due October 6, 2021
Anticipated Notice of Award November 5, 2021
B. Anticipated Project Schedule
Review and analysis of relevant City documents December 2021
Inspections January 2022
Initial draft Report February 2022
Revise draft (after City staff review) March 2022
Presentation to Infrastructure Management Advisory Committee March 2022
Presentation to City Council April 2022
Finalize Report May 2022
Please note that this schedule is preliminary. It is included to provide the Consultant
with a sense of the expected timeline for the Scope of Service and emphasize the
urgent nature of the work and the City’s expectation that the Scope of Services will be
completed as quickly as possible. The ideal Consultant candidate will have available
resources and personnel, either in-house or under subcontract, to ensure the
completion of the Scope of Services at the earliest possible time.
VI. NECESSARY QUALIFICATIONS AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Only one proposal per firm will be considered.
2. The submittal should be typed and as brief as possible while adequately
describing the qualifications of the firm. The final submittal shall be sent as a
PDF via email to James O'Neill, Project Manager at joneill@rpvca.gov.
3. The proposing firm shall submit the following information with the package,
including the same information for subcontractors, in the following format:
a) Cover Letter: Provide the name, address, and phone number of the firm; the
present staff (size, classification, credentials); the primary contact’s name,
phone number, and email address; any qualifying statements or comments
regarding the proposal; and identification of any sub-consultants and their
responsibilities. Identify the firm’s type of organization (individual, partnership,
corporation), including names and contact information for all officers, and
B-8
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 9 of 12
proof that the organization is currently in good standing. The signed letter
should also include a paragraph stating that the firm is unaware of any conflict
of interest in performing the proposed work. (No more than two pages)
b) Approach to Scope of Services: Re-state the Scope of Services with any
additions, expansions, clarifications, or modifications that the firm proposes in
order to provide the services and produce the deliverables contained in this
RFP. Describe how completing the Scope of Services will be approached and
any cost-saving or value-adding strategies or innovations the firm will bring to
the project. (No more than two pages)
c) Organization and Staffing: Identify the person who will be the Project
Manager and primary contact person responsible for the overall delivery of
the project. Provide an organizational chart of the project team that clearly
delineates communication and reporting relationships among the project staff
and among the sub-consultants involved in the project. Identify key personnel
to perform work in the various tasks and include major areas of subcontracted
work. Indicate the expected contributions of each staff member in time as a
percentage of the total effort. Specifically show the availability of staff to
provide the necessary resource levels to meet the City’s needs. Indicate that
the Project Manager and key staff will remain assigned to this project through
completion of the Scope of Services. (No more than two pages)
d) Staff Qualifications and Experience: Describe qualifications of the assigned
staff and sub-contractors including relevant technical experience. Staff
assigned to complete the Scope of Services must have p revious experience
in providing the necessary services as described under the Scope of
Services. A registered Professional Engineer must be the Project Manager.
Description of Consultant’s experience should include:
Prior Experience: Demonstrate that the firm has significant experience
providing services similar to those described under the Scope of Services.
(No more than two page)
Staff Qualifications: Provide resumes for the Project Manager and any
other key staff members to be assigned to contribute to the Scope of
Services, with an emphasis on similar services which they provided to
other agencies. (No more than ten pages)
Reference Projects: Include at least three projects with similar scope of
services performed by the project team within the past three years and
indicate the specific responsibilities of each team member on the
B-9
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 10 of 12
reference project. Provide contact information for each client. (No more
than ten pages)
e) Project Schedule: Provide a detailed critical-path-method schedule for
completion of the tasks and sub-tasks required to accomplish the scope of
work. Note all deliverables and interim milestones on the schedule. (No more
than one 11” x 17” page)
f) Quality Control Plan: Describe the quality control procedures and associated
staff responsibilities which will ensure that the deliverables will meet the City’s
needs. (No more than one page)
g) Acceptance of Conditions: State the offering firm’s acceptance of all
conditions listed in the Request for Proposal (RFP) document and Sample
Professional Services Agreement (Attachment D). Any exceptions or
suggested changes to the RFP or Professional Services Agreement (PSA),
including the suggested change, the reasons therefore and the impact it may
have on cost or other considerations on the firm’s behalf must be stated in the
proposal. Unless specifically noted by the firm, the City will rely on the
proposal being in compliance with all aspects of the RFP and in agreement
with all provisions of the PSA. (No more than one page)
VII. Submission of Proposal
A. Requests for Clarification
Requests for clarification of the information contained herein shall be submitted
in writing prior to 4:30 pm on September 24, 2021. Responses to any
clarification question will be provided to each firm from which proposals have
been requested. It is highly recommended that the prospective consultant firms
visit the City to view the project location prior to submitting a request for
clarification.
B. Confirmation Email
Upon submission of proposal to the City, the proposing firm shall request an email
confirmation that the proposal was received and retain the email as a record. If an
email confirmation is not received, the proposing firm shall correspond with the
City until a confirmation is received.
VIII. EVALUATIONS AND SELECTION PROCESS
1. Proposals Will be Evaluated Based on the Following Criteria:
a) Approach to Scope of Services (25%)
B-10
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 11 of 12
Understanding of the Scope of Services as demonstrated by the
thoroughness of the proposal, introduction of cost-saving or value-adding
strategies or innovations (including those applying to overall project
schedule), and an overall approach most likely to result in the desired
outcome for the City.
b) Proposal Schedule (25%)
Ability to complete the work in the shortest schedule possible (excluding
time for review and community meetings).
c) Staff Qualifications and Experience (25%)
Relevance of experience of the proposing firm (to provide support
resources to the project team)
Relevance of experience and strength of qualifications of the Project
Manager
Relevance of experience and strength of qualifications of the key
personnel performing the work
Relevance of referenced projects and client review of performance during
those projects
d) Organization and Staffing (15%)
Availability of key staff to perform the services throughout the duration of
the project
Assignment of appropriate staff in the right numbers to perform the Scope
of Services
Appropriate communication and reporting relationships to meet the City’s
needs
e) Quality Control (10%)
Adequate immediate supervision and review of staff performing the work
as well as appropriate independent peer review of the work by qualified
technical staff not otherwise involved in the project.
2. Selection Process
An evaluation panel will review all proposals submitted and select the top
proposals. These top firms may then be invited to make a (virtual) presentation to
the evaluation panel, at no costs to the City. The panel will select the proposal, if
any, which best fulfills the City’s requirements. The City will then further refine the
scope and schedule with that firm and request a fixed cost fee proposal. The City
will negotiate the fee with that firm. The City reserves the right to negotiate special
requirements and proposed service levels using the selected proposal as a basis.
If the City is unable to negotiate an agreeable fee for services with top firm, the
City will negotiate with the next firm chosen among the top firms.
3. Award Notification
B-11
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021 Page 12 of 12
The City will notify all proposers in writing of the outcome of the selection process
and intent to award. This RFP does not commit the City to award an agreement,
nor pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of the proposal in
anticipation of an agreement. The City reserves the right to reject any or all
proposals, or any part thereof, to waive any formalities or informalities, and to
award the agreement to the proposer deemed to be in the best interest of the City
and the Department.
4. Award of Agreement
The selected firm shall be required to enter into a written agreement (see sample
City agreement in Attachment B) with the City, in a form approved by the City
Attorney, to perform the Scope of Services. This RFP and the proposal, or any part
thereof, may be incorporated into and made a part of the final agreement; however,
the City reserves the right to further negotiate the terms and conditions of the
agreement with the selected consultant. The agreement will, in any event, include
a maximum "fixed cost" to the City.
B-12
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021
Attachment A
Current Pavement Management Program Report
B-13
FINAL REPORT
UPDATE OF
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
(Citywide)
2019-2024
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
April 18, 2019
100-21
B-14
April 18, 2019
Mr. Charles Eder, P.E.
Senior Engineer
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Subject: Final Report - Update of the Pavement Management Program
Dear Charles:
As part of the 2019 Update of the Pavement Management Program for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes,
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. is pleased to submit the Final Report for the City’s pavement management
program.
The information contained in this report was used to develop the recommended improvement program for
the pavement network. The report covers the following categories:
• Section I - Executive Summary
• Section II - Pavement Management Program Development and Reporting
• Section III - Pavement Conditions For Each Segment in the Network, PCI Report
The Pavement Condition Index report shows the present condition of each street in the
pavement network. In addition, the report shows the basic geometry of each street segment.
• Section IV - Forecast Maintenance Reports
• Recommended Maintenance and Repair (M&R) Strategies
The recommended maintenance and repair strategies were used to generate the
Forecasted Maintenance Report and were based on our 2019 inspections.
Additionally, we have assessed and incorporated unit cost and maintenance
application practices/types with our strategies.
B-15
BU CKNAM INFRASTRU CTUR E GROUP , IN C.
3548 Seagate Way, Suit e 230 Ocean side, CA 92056
T. 760.216.6529 F. 760.216.6549
www.buckna m-in c.com
• Projected Projects based on M&R Strategies
The Forecasted Maintenance Report projects the street maintenance activities
required for the next five years, broken down to show maintenance levels for Arterials
and Local streets. The report included in this section is broken down by fiscal year.
Our thorough analysis of previous and current Rancho Palos Verdes PMP strategies enabled our staff to make
proactive recommendations to the City’s pavement CIP. All comments received from the City have been
incorporated in the reports that follow. All of the City’s issues and needs that were brought to our attention
are included in the report. It has been a pleasure working with you and the City on updating your Pavement
Management Program. We look forward to the continued success of this project and future teamwork with
City staff.
Sincerely,
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
Peter J. Bucknam
Project Manager
Infrastructure Management – GIS Services
B-16
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page i
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary
A. Summary of City’s Pavement Network
B. Current Citywide Conditions
C. Maintenance Strategy Development
D. Annual Budget Projections
E. Quality Control Efforts
F. Findings and Recommendations
II. Pavement Management System-Capital Improvement Program
A. Summary of PMP Project
B. Maintenance Strategy Assignment Table
C. Annual CIP/M&R Work Program Projections
D. Condition Distribution Report
E. Calculation of PCI
III. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Reports
A. PCI Report – Data Definitions
B. Rancho Palos Verdes PCI Map - 2019
C. PCI Report; Sorted by Street Name (A to Z)
D. PCI Report; Sorted by PCI (0-100)
IV. Forecast Maintenance Report
A. Arterial (2019-2024)
B. Local (2019-2024)
B-17
m~
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page ii
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019
Table and Figure Reference Page #
Figure 1 – Pavement Area by Rank Sec 1-2
Figure 2 – Historical RPV PCI (2013-2019) Sec 1-4
Figure 3 – PCI Condition Distribution For All Streets (by section mi.) Sec 1-5
Figure 4 – Sample Pavement Life Cycle Sec 2-3
Figure 5 – Resulting Network PCI & Budget Expenditures (Actual Budget) Sec 2-7
Figure 6 – Resulting Network PCI & Budget Expenditures (Maintain Budget) Sec 2-9
Figure 7 – Arterial Condition Distribution Sec 2-13
Figure 8 – Local Condition Distribution Sec 2-13
Figure 9 – PCI Calculation Worksheet Sec 2-14
Figure 10 – Rancho Palos Verdes PCI Map – 2019 Sec 3-4
Table 1 – Condition Distribution by Mileage for AC Streets Sec 1-3
Table 2 – Historical PMP Data for All Streets Sec 1-3
Table 3 – Citywide Projection Utilizing “Actual” Budget Sec 1-8
Table 4 – Five-Year Projection Demonstrating Required Budget to Maintain PCI of 88.9 Sec 1-8
Table 5 – PCI Range Sec 2-2
Table 6 – Strategy Assignments Sec 2-2
Table 7 – Citywide Projection Utilizing “Actual” Budget ($5.5 Mil/yr) Sec 2-6
Table 8 – Five-Year Projection Demonstrating Required Budget to Maintain PCI of 88.9 Sec 2-8
Acronym Listing
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Geographic Information System (GIS)
Government Accounting Standards Board Statement 34 (GASB 34)
Hot-Mix Asphalts (HMA)
Los Angeles County MTA (METRO)
Maintenance and Repair (M&R)
Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
Pavement Management Program (PMP)
B-18
m~
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 1
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
SECTION I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2019 UPDATE OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
This report reflects the continued dedication and proactive management of the City’s Pavement
Management Program (PMP); the last major update to the City’s PMP was performed in 2016. As the City
of Rancho Palos Verdes (RPV) continues to show limited growth with its population, demographics,
infrastructure and maintenance needs, the street network has been running parallel as the system
matures and capital street projects widen streets. The City of RPV developed its PMP with the use of an
automated database program. Today, the City is currently using the Army Corps of Engineers software,
MicroPAVER, to manage the street network. This system is essential to the City in that it assists Public
Works staff in capturing funding for its arterial street system as well as cost-effectively manages the local
network through proactive maintenance and scheduling. Under this project, the City has incorporated
the development of a unique Pavement Management – GIS layer that will assist the City in spatially
analyzing pavement conditions and other attribute information that resides in the MicroPAVER database.
The RPV PMP has been developed and maintained to assist City personnel in providing current data on
the street network and to develop cost-effective maintenance strategies to sustain a desirable level of
pavement performance on a network scale, while optimizing the expenditure of limited fiscal resources.
The PMP efforts in 2019 consisted of analyzing the City’s 2016 PMP dataset for quality and usability. In
doing this, we were tasked to generate an updated Capital Improvement Program report that identified
recommendations and deficiencies in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City.
For this project, our staff surveyed all arterial routes to assist the City in complying with Los Angeles
County MTA (METRO) PMP requirements as well as surveyed all local streets and analyzed historical
maintenance operations.
Specifically, the program provides administrators and maintenance personnel with:
• The present condition status of the pavement network (arterial and local streets), as a whole
and of any grouping or individual component within the City;
• A ranked list of all streets, or segments of streets, by condition within the network;
• Rehabilitation/maintenance needs of each street segment by year;
• An optimized priority maintenance and rehabilitation program based on cost/benefit analysis
and various levels of funding;
• Optimum annual budget levels for pavement maintenance for the current and the following
five (5) years;
• Prediction of the future performance of the City’s pavement network and each individual street
section;
• Updated PMP data to assist the City with GASB 34 compliance; and
B-19
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 2
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
• Pavement condition data and analysis presented in ArcGIS that is compatible with City’s
existing GIS
Pavement is a dynamic structure where deterioration is constantly occurring; thus the pavement
management system needs to be updated on a regular basis to reflect these changes in pavement
conditions, pavement maintenance histories, and maintenance strategies based upon budgetary
constraints. In our approach to develop the City’s forecasted maintenance recommendations we worked
with RPV staff in identifying unit costs for all maintenance practices used on an annual. Currently, based
upon the City’s maintenance practices and their associated unit costs, the total replacement value of the
RPV pavement network is $194,619,000. This value clearly indicates that the City’s pavement network is
the most valuable and essential asset to RPV. The City’s use of slurry seal and ARHM Overlay practices
are typically applied at a seven year and fifteen year frequency respectively. These frequencies are typical
but the City may see increases in deterioration rates due to environmental, load and high average daily
traffic (ADT) volumes. For example, high ADT volumes along one of RPV’s arterial streets will increase
deterioration rates for a previously applied AC Overlay compared to a small local street. These
deterioration rates are monitored through frequent inspections and functional class deterioration analysis
within the City’s PMP database.
This report reflects our findings and recommendations for the PMP and the current state of the City’s
pavement network. Furthermore, we have recommended detailed funding and maintenance strategies
for the arterial/collector and residential networks for next five (5) years.
CITY’S PAVEMENT NETWORK
Within the Rancho Palos Verdes pavement
management network there are approximately 41.5
section miles of Arterial streets. The Arterial network
consists of approximately 6,997,925 SF of pavement
which consists of 163 pavement sections. The Local
network consists of approx. 17,620,075 SF of
pavement which consists of 669 pavement sections
totaling in 108.6 section miles. Combined, the entire
network consists of 150.1 section miles of streets and
24,618,000 SF of pavement.
The City’s pavement network is broken down into manageable groups that have similar characteristics,
such as pavement rank, surface type and logical segmentation. Pavement segments are identified by their
branch and section numbers. Pavement “branches” that have a common usage, such as Crest Rd., defines
a “branch” within MicroPAVER. Pavement “sections” are pavement segments within the defined branch
that have consistent pavement rankings, construction/maintenance histories and use. Representative
inspection samples are then selected and visually surveyed to locate distress data. This data is used to
calculate the pavement sections Pavement Condition Index (PCI) which includes distress type, extent of
the distress and its severity.
Figure 1
B-20
Pavement A r ea (SF) By Ra nk
• Arteria I ■ Loca Is
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 3
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
The PCI is a condition rating that ranges from 100 (a new pavement section or recently overlaid or
reconstructed) to 0 for a section that has structurally failed and deteriorated dramatically. Weighted
average PCI of a given area/zone = pavement section PCI * its own area divided by the total square footage
of the given area/zone. Table 1 summarizes the section conditions found within the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes pavement network by rank.
• The weighted average PCI for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Arterial network is 87.4
• The weighted average PCI for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Local network is 89.5
The weighted PCI value associated with the Arterial and Local routes shown through our survey analysis
is timely in that it is showing that a sensible amount of preventative, slurry seal, and overlay work will be
needed over the next several years to maintain the level of condition (PCI) within a “preventative
maintenance” state.
CURRENT CITYWIDE CONDITIONS (ARTERIALS AND LOCALS)
The overall condition of the City’s pavement network is “Good” with a weighted average PCI of 88.9
based on the surface area of each segment. The distribution of the City’s overall pavement network is
shown in Section III of this report (Condition Distribution).
For comparison, Bucknam has performed pavement management studies for several other Los Angeles
County agencies and has included their weighted PCI values; El Segundo (72.5), Culver City (73.6), Lomita
(69.3), and Hermosa Beach (73.1).
Table 1 – Condition Distribution by Mileage for All Streets
Table 2 – Historical PMP Data for All Streets
As shown above, a large majority of segments are distributed through Good to Very Good condition
categories (95%, approximately 143.7 section miles). These findings indicate that the proper maintenance
has been performed on the pavement network for some time.
B-21
Condition PCI Ran~e _ Arterial Local _ Total % of Network
! Ve ry Good l ,8,6,-100 ! 26_7 l 9 1-2 ! 117 _9
l Good T 75-85 ! 10 _2 T 1 5 _6, : 25-8
1 :~;~~:r ; r ;~ r ;; r ;:;
: ....................................... = ...................................... .
78_5%
17 _2%
3 _3 %
0 _9%
0_1% -----~
P<l 20 19
87 _4 ...................................
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 4
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
Figure 2 – Historical Rancho Palos Verdes PCI (2013-2019)
With 89% of the City’s Arterial network pavement sections within the condition levels of “Good to Very
Good” (approximately 36.9 section miles), a proactive preventative stop gap & timely overlay
maintenance program needs to be continuously funded; this will maintain the citywide weighted PCI at
its current conditions and will gradually decrease the existing overlay backlog on the network thus
reducing maintenance costs in fiscal years 2019 and beyond.
Local/Residential network conditions show that 98% of the pavement network is within the condition
levels of “Good to Very Good” (approximately 106.8 section miles). The remaining 2% of the Local
network should be considered for slurry seal and overlay maintenance; this accounts for approximately
1.8 section miles of streets. The City utilizes a nine zone cycle approach which focus maintenance &
rehabilitation efforts, on an annual basis, within strategic geographic areas.
The City’s ability to proactively schedule effective Arterial CIP projects and Local M&R projects has
resulted in very high citywide conditions. These findings are positive in that the amount of revenue
needed to maintain the network is not overbearing or detrimental to the system as a whole. Cost
efficient preventative maintenance should be the focus of the Arterial & Local PMP for the next several
years.
Furthermore, as large overlay and rehabilitation projects are considered for funding, the City should also
consider using sub-grade R - Values, non-destructive testing, structural design, distress severities and
extents as parameters for determining whether a pavement section that lies within the Fair to Poor
condition range should be overlaid or reconstructed.
PCI conditions reflect “surface” conditions; additional sub-surface data such as coring data, R-Values and
asphalt depths will provide City to with a better approach to the maintenance that should be applied.
B-22
95.0
90 .0
85 .0
80.0
75 .0
70.0
PC l 2006
Hi stori ca l RPV PC I (2013-2019)
PC l 20 09 PC l 20B PC l 20 16
-Arter ia l -1!.o,cal s -Cnvw itte
895
PC l 2019
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 5
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
Figure 3 – PCI Condition Distribution All Streets (by Section Mi.)
Units shown above indicate total mileage (Table 1)
MAINTENANCE STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT
Based on the results of the condition survey and input from the City, pavement
maintenance/rehabilitation strategies were developed. At the outset, the City and Bucknam staff
identified a distribution of City maintenance funds that would be applied to the network over the next
five years. This was based upon the desire to prevent the decrease in street conditions and not allow an
increase in the maintenance backlog funds over the five-year program. All residential zone schedules
were assessed and analyzed. Additionally, the RPV maintenance and rehabilitation zone cycle now utilizes
a eight (8) cycle.
With this approach, Bucknam has recommended a “minimal level of service” which creates a major
dividing line in determining pavement maintenance. Generally within pavement management programs,
a PCI range between 55 to 70 determines the threshold of when preventative or major overlay
maintenance is activated. Based on the City’s weighted average PCI, condition distribution, maintenance
practices, our team has identified a PCI of “65” as the minimum level of service. This means that any
pavement section with a PCI greater than 65 will be recommended for preventative maintenance. This
recommendation is indicated in Table 6, Section II.
Bucknam developed a multi-year Capital Improvement Program for the City based on the pavement
records, yearly capital expenditures and the most recent 2019 inspections. These recommendations and
results are shown in Section II of this report where we have demonstrated what level of funding is
necessary to maintain the current PCI as well as how the City’s current pavement budget performs against
today’s conditions.
B-23
PCI Distribution For All Streets (by Section Mi.)
Poor; 1,.3; 1% r Very Poor; 0.1; 0%
■ Very Good ■ Good • Fa,ir • Poor ■ Very Poor
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 6
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
As shown in Figure 3, 96% of the City’s streets are in Very Good to Good condition. These sections will be
targeted for “preventive” maintenance within our Capital Improvement Program (CIP) recommendations.
The reasoning in doing this is to extend the life cycles of those “fair/good” pavement sections which
accrues capital saving to aggressively rehabilitate those pavement sections that are below the “minimal
level of service”.
In order to achieve the most effective and optimum program for the City, certain strategies have been
selected and/or analyzed. Below is a listing of the maintenance activities utilized in strategy development.
Each activity is representative of the types of work that have been programmed as part of the long-term
maintenance requirements of the City’s street network.
General Repairs-Stop Gap (Localized Maintenance*)
For this maintenance type, small localized surface treatments are utilized as “holding action” solutions
(stop gaps) to delay the need for pavement structural strengthening. They typically include activities
such as crack sealing, deep patching, skin patching, grinding and leveling.
Slurry Seals (Global Maintenance*)
Surface treatments applied to pavements with minimal surface distress to provide new wearing
surfaces and extend pavement life. Generally consists of a mixture of conventional or latex-modified
emulsified asphalt, well-graded fine aggregate, mineral filler and water placed over an existing AC
surface.
Leveling Courses (Global Maintenance*)
The existing pavement should be made as smooth as possible before being overlaid. It is difficult to make
up elevation differences or smooth out ruts by varying overlay thickness. For flexible overlays, Hot-mix
asphalt (HMA) tends to differentially compact; a rule of thumb is that conventional mixes will compact
approximately 6 mm per 25 mm (0.25 inches per 1 inch) of uncompacted thickness.
Therefore, before applying the final surface course the existing pavement is typically leveled by one or
both of the following methods:
1. Applying a leveling course (HMA pavements). The first lift applied to the existing pavement is used
to fill in ruts and make up elevation differences. The top of this lift, which is relatively smooth, is
used as the base for the wearing course.
2. Milling (HMA pavements). A top layer is milled off the existing pavement to provide a relatively
smooth surface on which to pave. Milling is also commonly used to remove a distressed surface
layer from an existing pavement.
B-24
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 7
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
Overlays (Major Maintenance*)
AC Overlay – Placement of a layer of hot-mixed asphalt concrete over the existing pavement surface
(may include pavement fabric). Grinding (milling) is performed prior to the overlay to reduce the total
height of asphalt and assure alignment with existing gutter lines.
This also includes “dig-outs” and crack sealing prior to the application of an overlay. This treatment
provides a new wearing surface and increased structural strength to the pavement section. A
conventional overlay should be designed for a ten-year life.
AC Over PCC – Placement of a layer of hot-mixed asphalt concrete over the existing PCC surface.
Includes grinding, leveling course, joint sealing and localized repairs prior to AC overlay.
Asphalt Rubber Hot-Mix Overlay - The ASTM definition is: Asphalt-Rubber is a blend of asphalt cement,
reclaimed tire rubber and certain additives in which the rubber component is at least 15% by weight
of the total blend and has reacted in the hot asphalt cement sufficiently to cause swelling of the rubber
particles. Specifically, using crumb rubber modified binders in pavement application benefit local
agencies in that cities find:
• Pavement resists cracking by being more flexible;
• Cost savings come from a longer life cycle (from Bucknam’s experience typically 20% longer),
decreased maintenance and the use of less material
• Improvement in skid resistance;
• Decreased noise; and
• It provides long-lasting color contrast for marking and striping
Reconstruction (Major Maintenance*)
Removal of the existing pavement section to a prescribed depth followed by the placement of a
conventional flexible pavement section using a structural AC Hot Mix or AR Hot Mix or a full depth
asphalt. Each classification of road has a typical design cross-section upon anticipation traffic loading.
*Localized, Global and Major maintenance activities are default terms used within the MicroPAVER
pavement software. Specific pavement repair applications are placed within each maintenance
activity in order to develop multi-year maintenance forecast recommendations.
B-25
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 8
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
ANNUAL BUDGET PROJECTIONS
The budgeting process was approached with the following in mind; generate two unique work programs
for the next five (5) years based upon actual road pavement conditions in order to:
1. Demonstrate how the City’s current “Actual” budget allocation for pavement maintenance
performs against the conditions found through our surveys
2. Recommend a proactive annual budget that, at a minimum, maintains the current weighted PCI
on the network
Based on current and future pavement maintenance needs, two annual work programs have been
prepared and summarized below. Table 3 demonstrates the pavement maintenance recommendations
based upon the revenues available in the RPV five-year CIP program. Table 4 demonstrates the
recommended budget that is needed to maintain the current weighted PCI on the network (each scenario
addresses arterial and local streets).
Table 3 – Citywide Projection Utilizing “Actual” Budget
Table 4 – Five-Year Projection Demonstrating Required Budget to Maintain PCI of 88.9
The revenue shown below are baseline AC/PCC construction cost projections that the City utilizes for
determining and scheduling key annual pavement section projects. Additional contingency costs, like
those listed in Section II page 5, are calculated by City staff to determine the overall, proactive zone
budget for the given fiscal year. The City is now utilizing an eight (8) year cycle for maintenance and
rehabilitation.
B-26
Plan Yea r PCI Befo r e PCI Afte r Slu rry Seal Overlay Total S
, 20 19 -20 : ,88 _9 ,89 _1 . $335,500 . $1,5 20 ,.5 00 j $ ,85 7,000
: ........ ??..?.~.?.~ ........ l.. ........... :~.~.:?. ............ J.. ............ ·~.~:.~ ............. l.. ............... $..~.!.f.~g ................. l.. ........... :?.}l >.!.~r.~q ............. l.. ........... :?. .... r.?.'?.9-i~~ ............ .
1 202 1-2 2 1 ,87 _5 i .S8-3 1 $5 75,9 0 0 i $1,55 8,.400 1 $2,1 35,300
l ......... ?.c.>?~:?~ ........ l.. ........... :~:!5..'.~ .............. ~ ............. :~?.:.3. .............. 1.. .............. t ..?..~f.~gg ............ l... ......... ?..~r.~.~·~r.~l?g ............. l.. ........... :?. .. ..i~:?' ... r.':1?.9 ............ .
' 202 3-24 ' 8 5 _1 i ,8,6,_0 1 $53 1,000 ' $1,291,000 ' $1,92 2,.000
: ....................................... · ....................................... · ...................................... . I s2,102,100 s 1,373,soo $9,476,soo
Plan Yea r PCI Befo r e PCI Afte r Slu rry Seal Ove r lay Total S
, 2019-20 . .S8 _9 ,89 _1 . $5 1 5,400 . $1,5 20,.5 0 0 . .$2,0 3 5,9 00
1 2020-2 1 i ,88-2 i .S8B i $2 1 2,9 00 i $1,5 19 ,400 i $ ,832,300 l" ...... 'io'i 1~'i i ...... T ............ :s;·:s .............. r--............ a:s ~9: ............ T ............... s.;;·;·2·~·1·;;; .............. T ............ :si 2:s;~:soo ............ T ............ :sio09~500 ............ .
1 2022-23 1 8 7-7 r ,88 _5 1 $577,500 1 $1 ,447,100 1 $2,124,600 r .... i-o·i s~i',i' .. ·r ...... :87 :s ........ , ...... ·.a·8~3 ........ r ......... ·s·sa i :300 ........... r ...... ·:si sos~:Wo ......... ·r ....... :s;~i:a,6~700 .... ..
: ................................................................................. · ...................................... . 1.
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 9
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
Additional detail and breakdown of budget projections are demonstrated in Section IV of this report.
All work program budgets generated are presented in terms of current 2019 dollars. All repair activities
were based on distresses observed at the time of the field survey. These are recommendations and are
to be used as “the best case scenario” for improving the City of Rancho Palos Verdes street network.
QUALITY CONTROL EFFORTS
As indicated in our scope of work, Bucknam performed numerous quality control checks in the field during
survey efforts as well assessing the provided 2016 MicroPAVER database. Only minimal pavement
segmentation corrections had to be made prior to field survey as well as the re-establishment of the PMP-
GIS link. These included splitting sections based upon street width and/or age of asphalt; naming
conventions for several sections were also made to ensure proper from-to designation.
Field check efforts were performed at the end of each week of survey. During in-house and field
operations, we came across several issues with the previous databases. These included incorrect
pavement section true areas; these were corrected through our assessment of the most recent/available
RPV aerial and field inspections.
B-27
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 10
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Arterials
The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Arterial street network is currently in
“Good” condition. To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay
activities are funded at the levels identified in Table 4 and the reports in Section IV to maintain a good
network weighted average PCI value.
Our arterial findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown
below:
• The Arterial network has a weighted PCI of 87.4;
• Currently, 8% of the arterial network (approx. 3.2 section miles) qualify for overlay rehabilitation;
currently 28% qualifies for slurry seal maintenance (approx. 11.8 section miles);
• Arterial capital projects should focus on maintaining the current weighted PCI of 84 over the next
five years;
• Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify arterial overlay projects based on the
deterioration modeling within MicroPAVER;
• Maintain arterial revenues at the levels shown within the Section IV Forecasted Maintenance
Report for a minimum of five years to generate the results identified within this report.
• Reassess/re-evaluate the arterial rehabilitation budget program every two years to improve on
CIP forecasts for 2019-20 and beyond to ensure the results shown in Table 3 or 4;
• Perform pavement inspections on the arterial network every two years to build a solid planning
model within MicroPAVER to track PCI deterioration.
• Demonstrated budgets shown in Table 4 is ample enough to maintain the arterial weighted PCI of
88.9 through five years,
• Bucknam recommends that the City proactively budget pavement maintenance at the levels
shown in Table 4 in order to improve upon the conditions found today
B-28
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 11
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section I
Locals
The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Local street network is currently in “Good”
condition. To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are
funded at the levels identified in Table 4 and the reports in Section IV to maintain a good network
weighted average PCI value.
Our Local findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below:
• The Local network has a weighted PCI of 89.5;
• Currently, 1% of the local network (approx. 1.1 section miles) qualify for overlay rehabilitation;
currently 15% qualifies for slurry seal maintenance (approx. 16.3 section miles);
• Local maintenance projects should focus on maintaining the current weighted PCI of 84 over the
next five years;
• Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify Local overlay projects based on the
deterioration modeling within MicroPAVER;
• Increase Local revenues at the levels shown within the Section IV Forecasted Maintenance Report
for a minimum of five years to generate the results identified within this report.
• Reassess/re-evaluate the Local rehabilitation budget program every two years to improve on
budget forecasts for 2019-20 and beyond to ensure the results shown in Table 3 or 4;
• Perform pavement inspections on the Local network every three years to build a solid planning
model within MicroPAVER to track PCI deterioration (1/3 of the City each year);
• Demonstrated budgets shown in Table 4 is ample enough to maintain the Local weighted PCI;
proactive funding needs to be implemented to see these results.
B-29
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 1
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
SECTION II
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM / CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Bucknam performed the following services in accordance with the scope of services that was contracted
with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. As a quick overview, the following tasks were performed to
complete the work over the past several months:
2019 Pavement Management Work Efforts:
Task 1: Project Kickoff-Data Management
Task 2: Update of Maintenance Activities
Task 3: Pavement Condition Survey (approx. 145.5 miles)
Task 4: Budgetary Analysis and Capital Improvement Reports
Task 5: Executive Summary and Final CIP Reports
Task 6: Mapping of the Pavement Network
Pavement Management Update 2019
As a part of the 2019 update of the pavement management system, a major element of work was to
complete a comprehensive assessment of the existing street network and PMP database within the City.
This included assessing the City’s existing 2016 MicroPAVER database, GIS street centerline, street naming
conventions and work history information. From there, Bucknam worked with the City to confirm public
and private street listings which set the foundation for accurate CIP reporting. All data was then verified
or updated within the City’s new MicroPAVER database.
Work history information was provided by the City in the form of completed bid documents, institutional
knowledge, and previous dataset and Excel documents. This information was entered into the proper
pavement segments that match the limits of those projects. From there, CIP pavement recommendations
were performed (discussed and demonstrated below) where the pavement maintenance information the
City provided (PMP material practices, unit costs, and capital budgets) were used to generate
recommendations through the MicroPAVER system.
Table 5 demonstrates PCI ranges defaulted within MicroPAVER. Once a pavement inspection is complete,
a PCI is calculated for each pavement section. Each PCI calculated falls within a defined PCI range category
(Very Good, Very Poor, etc.). Furthermore, a weighted PCI was calculated for the each functional class
within the network (arterials and locals).
The PCI is a condition rating that ranges from 100 (a new pavement section or recently overlaid or
reconstructed) to 0 for a section that has structurally failed and deteriorated dramatically. Weighted
average PCI of a given area/zone = pavement section PCI multiplied by its own area divided by the total
square footage of the given area/zone. This information can also be represented through MicroPAVER to
show how much square footage or percentage of area falls within a PCI range category.
B-30
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 2
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
PCI RANGE CONDITION
86-100 Very Good (RPV Network 2019 = 88.9)
75-85 Good
60-74 Fair
41-59 Poor
0-40 Very Poor
Table 5 - PCI Range
These condition ranges are defined by the Army Corps of Engineers and defaulted within the MicroPAVER
software. The summary of all roads condition data and their representative PCI's can be seen in the
Pavement Condition Report in Section III.
STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT TABLE
Once the appropriate activities from the above listings were selected by the City, a Maintenance Strategy
Table was defined within the system that allocated the appropriate actions to the specific repair needs of
the street. In defining the maintenance strategy list, emphasis was placed on defining pavement condition
thresholds and using the PCI for the specific maintenance activities within these categories.
Strategy Assignment Table
Table 6 - Strategy Assignments
The Strategy Assignments List, shown in Table 6, was developed to identify the most critical segments in
each of the work programs (Arterial and Local). Segment priorities were established by determining the
range of PCI's requiring first attention based on the relative value of each segment’s PCI, thus maximizing
the annual maintenance budget. Also, distress quantity, area extent, type and severity were critical
elements in the decision process for recommending maintenance.
B-31
All Streets
I PU Range Unit Cost
I
Pr ev e ntat ive, Sto p Ga p, P.atdni ng Vari e s. by A.ietivity
Va r i e s. by A ctivity , .
I ····················::~~·····················.1····,c~·p·~··s ·~:~T(.;~~~ ~s~~~:·~: :~·~~:~~·~~·~·~·)······I ·······················.~:~·~~~:······················
20-100
Minimal Level of Servke (65)
l 3 0% Co nting ency i nduded w ithin A IJ I.Jn i t Cos ts
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 3
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
The assignment table is used as a guide within MicroPAVER to recommend maintenance, however, further
assessment by City staff and/or outside parties can override maintenance recommendations. This can be
done by reviewing and assessing distress extents and their weighted percentages.
Once the strategy assignments were set within the system, budgets and work assignments were
generated for each work program on an annual basis. Using pavement deterioration curves for each type
of pavement surface and class of road, both current year and future years work requirements for each
pavement segment within the City were determined. In forecasting the maintenance requirements in
future years, the current PCI value is reduced annually for each pavement segment based on the
MicroPAVER deterioration curves within the City’s database.
Likewise, maintenance activities performed in a given year increase the PCI value as they are applied to
the segment. The overall program is dynamic in that each strategy consists of a cyclic series of actions
that simulates the pavement anticipated life cycle.
Figure 4 – Sample Pavement Life Cycle
B-32
100 $.35/SF For
Slurry here
7 Good
$3 .25/SF ------55 Fa ir
W ill cost
2S Poor $9.50/SF
h ere
0
0
1 3 5 "7 T-m Hi
(Yea r s)
7
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 4
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
MULTI-YEAR ANNUAL CIP/M&R PROGRAM PROJECTIONS
The goal of these projections is to assist City policy makers in utilizing the recommendations of the
MicroPAVER system. By using the City of Rancho Palos Verdes’ current budgets and maintenance
practices the system will develop “section unique” improvements and strategies. Each segment will be
tied to a specific fiscal year. As shown in the following pages, we have assessed the budgets that have
been projected to meet the maintenance and rehabilitations needed to maximize the City’s return on
investment. The budget forecasting goal for the City network focused on:
Establishing a proactive multi-year Maintenance & Rehabilitation Program;
Developing a preventive maintenance program; and
Selecting the most cost-effective repairs based on City strategies
ACTUAL BUDGET – The Actual budget was generated for the City to demonstrate how the City’s 5-Year
Roadway Infrastructure funding allocation performs against the current citywide conditions.
• City’s Actual budget includes:
o Arterials projects (Crenshaw and Highridge were included within Arterial
projections)
o Local are funded at:
FY 2019-20 - $5,500,000 (Zone 5)
FY 2020-21 - $5,500,000 (Zones 9)
FY 2021-22 - $5,500,000 (Zone 8)
FY 2022-23 - $5,500,000 (Zones 3 & 4)
FY 2023-24 - $5,500,000 (Zone 1)
o Projects are funded through General Fund, Proposition C, STPL, & Measure R
MAINTAIN BUDGET – A Maintain budget was generated for the City to demonstrate the necessary funding
that is required to maintain the current weighted PCI level of 88.9 through a five year model.
*All multi-year budget projections include a 3% inflation rate for the term of the budget forecast.
B-33
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 5
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
ARTERIAL / LOCAL
BUDGET PROJECTIONS
The annual projected revenues shown below only account for the cost of pavement maintenance and
rehabilitation activities. A 30% construction contingency was applied and included to the pavement costs
shown in Table 6. Additional soft costs not included within the cost of pavement maintenance include:
These incidental costs are monitored and applied to the City’s annual zone construction & maintenance
cost projections. Additional incidental contingency factors of approximately 100% to 120% have been
calculated by City staff. These added contingencies assist City staff in identifying how to allocate the
annual $5,500,000/yr budget. The following budget projections demonstrate AC/PCC construction costs
only.
Our projections demonstrate an industry standard five-year PCI / Deferred M&R program; the City of
Rancho Palos Verdes utilizes a eight-year maintenance cycle which is assessed and reported on every two-
years through these types of PMP studies. This proactive audit allows staff to monitor RPV’s weighted
PCI’s and allocated budgets which in turn ensures solid management practices.
B-34
Rancho Palos Verdes Incidental PMP Costs
................................................... Si d ew.a I k Repa i r s···················································(··················· .......... Traf fic ,co ntrol . si g ning ........................................... .
.............................................................. Drivew ay s·····························································(························ ....................... .5 .. r e et .m arkings .................................................... .
......................................................... c ross.g utte r s·························································:··························· .................... lltilityadj u stm e nts ............................................... .
................................................... Lo ca I .. d e p r e s.s i o n s .................................................. : ............................................. AC Lo ca Ii z.e d . r e p airs .............................................. .
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... . ~~P.:~.~.1t .. ~.~r.~.~········ ...................................... : ................ Eng i n ee ri ng-Gon stru cti o~ .. ~.~.~.~~~.~.~.~~ .............. .
................................................... Tr ee .. rnot .prnning ··················································'······························································'·~?P..~.~.i.'?'.~ ............................................................. .
.................................................................. s tri p ing ·································································;······················································M at e r i a l .t esting .................................................... .
Ri g ht-o f -way , ,c urb & g utte r, ADA im p rov e m e nts : Tr ee r e m ov a l s
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 6
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
ACTUAL – The first key step in developing a proactive PMP is to model the City’s existing conditions against
the “actual” annual budget. In doing this, PCI performance, deferred maintenance and pavement
application uses are able to benchmarked and demonstrated in a positive or negative result. The City’s
existing 5-Yr Roadway Infrastructure budget was used for this model; the City provided Bucknam with
current 2019 unit costs for pavement maintenance applications.
The resulting PCI conditions and resulting M&R distributions are shown below. Bucknam worked with the
City’s Public Works staff to review previous methodologies and schedules applied by the City. The City
provided information on the current work schedules and yearly goals for asphalt application. With this
scenario, our initial goal is to provide the City with a budgetary outlook and conditional impact report that
can be used to eventually create a solid, preventative maintenance program.
ACTUAL BUDGET PROGRAM
Actual Budget Program incorporates pavement sections that have a functional class of Arterial (A),
Collector (C) and Locals (E).
Table 7 – Citywide Projection Utilizing “Actual” Budget ($5.5 Mil/yr)
By modeling the existing pavement conditions against the City’s available funding, we have found that
three major positive results occur over the five year CIP. (See Figure 5 on the following page). First, the
weighted PCI for the entire network remains very high over the five year CIP (PCI results in 86 by FY 2023-
24); this reduction in overall PCI is expected through the natural/necessary degradation of PCI. Pavement
sections with high level PCI >85 should be allowed to natural deteriorate to a PCI that triggers proper
maintenance (<85).
Secondly, the resulting deferred maintenance backlog shows that it decreases as well from $8.7 million
to $1.2 million after the five years program which indicates that an annual “Roadway Infrastructure”
budgets are ample enough to improve upon the deferred maintenance (or backlog of maintenance) on
the network. The current budget allocation is allowing the necessary zone slurry seal & overlay projects
to be completed on the arterial and local networks; this in turn reduces a potential high amount of
maintenance to latter years of the CIP thus decreasing the costs of maintenance.
This result should be discussed further among City staff. Combined with the positive results found with
the weighted PCI and deferred maintenance we recommended that this 5-yr maintenance schedule be
followed.
B-35
Plan Year PCI Before PCI After Slurry 5eal Overlay Total S I
: 2019-20 : ,88 _9 : 8:9 _1 : $335,500 : $1,5 20 ,.5 00 : $1 ,8 5 7,000
l ......... ~.?.?(:)_-:.~·~······..l.············:~.1?..:?. ........... ..l ............ :~.Ei::.Ei: ............. l... .............. :?..1?..~/:1.<>._c:i ............... ..l. ............ $.}r.~.~.~/~Q(J. ............. ~ .............. ?.}r.?.'?.9-1.~"?.(J. ............ .
: 202 1-22 : ,87 _5 \ &8-3 : $5 75;900 : $1,55 8,400 : $2,1 3 5,300
l·········:·~}t:·:········t·············:::·}··········· l ············~::::·············f ···············: :: :~: ··i ···········!·~:::::::~~· ········..1.············: ~::::·~::~ ············
: ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• = ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• · •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
s2,102,100 s1,3n,soo $9,476,soo I
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 7
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
This situation indicates that the City is in an excellent situation where a continued proactive slurry seal
program, combined with strategic and timely overlays, will allow the City to remain in a “preventative
maintenance” condition. This equates to lower cost annual maintenance costs for FY 2023 and beyond
and proactive management of RPV streets and right-of-ways.
With today’s economic issues at the Federal, State and local levels; the City should continuously monitor
the management of overlay deferred maintenance. The potential delay in projects and the resulting
buildup of more overlay work in the five-year time frame is not a debt that City will want to accept.
Through Bucknam’s analysis of the previous pavement database, work history dates and our experience
with AC Overlay deterioration rates, it is important to point out that pavement sections that were overlaid
in fiscal year 2006 will typically need proper overlay maintenance around fiscal year 2019-20 and beyond.
Figure 5 – Resulting Network PCI and Budget Expenditures (Actual Budget)
The resulting “increase of the weighted PCI” for the entire network demonstrates how applying proper
funds to the network is preventing the City’s pavement from deteriorating at a rate that is not conducive
to a PMP success. Based on available funding or programmed funding identified by the City’s long-term
CIP, there may be an opportunity to proactively schedule or appropriate funds to areas of the City that
have been annually deferred due to high maintenance costs.
Additionally, the City should continue to implement local, stop gap maintenance (i.e. deep patching, crack
sealing, etc.) prior to any major slurry seal or overlay maintenance. By performing stop gap measures to
individual pavement sections the overall performance of the sections condition will increase and sustain
itself longer than if no preventative maintenance was performed.
B-36
Citywide 5-Yr CIP Projections (Actual Budget)
90_0 $2.,500,000
&8 .9 89.1
89.0
$2.,000,000
SS.O
87.3
87.0 Sl,5 0,000
86.0
8'6 .0 $1,000,000
85_0
ss 0,000
84.0
83.0 so
2019-20 202.0--21 202.1-22 202.2-23
-f),(I Before -f),(I A er -Total $
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 8
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
MAINTAIN PCI PROGRAM (FIVE YEAR MODEL)
With the City striving to show proactive maintenance across all City pavements, a budget program was
generated to show the greatest return on investment through the application of slurry seal, mill & cap,
and alternative overlay maintenance. Our goal under this model is to maintain the current 2019 weighted
PCI of 88.9 through a five-year program. This model will demonstrate the necessary funding to achieve
this goal.
Again, we used the “Actual” 5-yr PMP model (shown above) as a cornerstone for our modeling within the
“maintain” program. Combining the previous reporting model with a realistic and achievable annual
budget, we found positive results.
The Recommended Program incorporates pavement sections that have a functional class of Arterial (A),
Collector (C) and Local (E).
Table 8– Five-Year Projection Demonstrating Required Budget to Maintain PCI of 88.9
Referring to Table 8, it is noted that the weighted PCI remains at 88.9 after the five-year budget analysis.
Furthermore, the annual deferred maintenance total also decreases from $8.7 million to $750,000 at the
end of the five-years if the City utilizes an annual budget average of $2,037,800/yr for slurry maintenance
and overlay rehabilitation. We found that annual average square footage breakdowns of maintenance
areas were consistent and well balanced.
We recommend that the CIP/maintenance funds be focused on the Local & Arterial networks evenly due
to the fact that both networks are now within a less than 1% PCI variance.
B-37
Plan Yea r PCI Befor e PCI After Slu r ry Seal Over lay Total S
. 2019-20 , ,8 8 .9 i .S9 .1 . $5 1 5, 0 . $1,5 20,.5 00 , $2,03 5;900
1. ........ :·~·:·t·:·:········~·············:::·::···········---l-··········--~!::::·············t················!·;·;·:·:!·~;···············~·············:!t!:~;':~~··········•--❖-••··········:!-;:~.:::
i 2022-23 i .87 .7 r .SS .5 i $677,500 i $1,447,100 i $2,1 2 4,600
r·······iois~i4·······-r···········:s1 ·:s············T············.a·s~3·············r··············s·a:a·1·~3·00··············r···········:si 30s~400············r···········:s-;~1:a:6~700·············
$3,009,200 $7,179,900 $10,189,100
----------------------
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 9
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
Figure 6 – Resulting Network PCI and Budget Expenditures (Maintain Budget)
As mentioned above, a local slurry/overlay maintenance “zone/area” strategy should be continued for
several reasons. With the City applying a maintenance area methodology to the local network, four
beneficial impacts occur:
1) Planned / Maintenance areas are addressed every seven years which creates a dedicated
project schedule for City staff and constituent inquiries;
2) Deferred overlay maintenance can be addressed in a more effective manner due to accrued
revenues
3) A preventative maintenance strategy is more cost-effective in a long-term PMP rather than
implementing a maintenance approach that addresses only the “worst-first” streets.
4) All maintenance alternatives are available due to the increased funding and focused
maintenance within one zone per year.
On the negative side, if low weighted PCI values occur within a given zone, all streets within that zone may
not be able to be addressed with maintenance when that zone is scheduled for maintenance. The
deferred maintenance will have to be scheduled for maintenance in future years or simply will have to
wait until the zone cycle repeats.
The Local maintenance model that has been developed under the Actual budget can be used as a
benchmark to monitor the City’s annual budget allocations as the network continues to mature and age;
the proper amount of funding for slurry seal and overlay maintenance needs to be the City’s highest
priority.
B-38
Citywi de 5-Yr CIP Pr oj ect i ons (M ai nta i n PC I Budget )
&9.5
89.l
89.0
gg.5 88.3
SRO
&7.5
&7 .0
86 . .5
2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
-PC I Before -PC I After -otal S
$2,300,000
$2,200,000
$2,100,000
s2.000.000
$1,9 00,000
$1,800, 0
$1,700,000
$1,500, 00
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 10
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
Additionally, it is recommended that the City continue to monitor the application of Slurry Seal or Grind
& Overlay as an asphalt application for the specific local sections. Specific sections are now qualifying for
maintenance that warrants a stronger application rather than a typical slurry seal. With a five to eight
year cycle in motion, it is essential to address local sections that have PCI’s less than 65 with the proper
maintenance since crews will not be back within that area for seven to eight years.
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE
Delaying repairs on streets where pavement condition indicates a need creates deferred maintenance.
Deferred maintenance includes pavement maintenance / rehabilitation that is needed across the entire
network, but cannot be performed due to the lack of available funding and is pushed to the next budget
cycle. The actual repairs that are being deferred are often referred to as a “backlog”.
As maintenance is deferred, the opportunity to apply life extending preventive pavement applications
is lost and the ultimate cost of rehabilitation multiples.
B-39
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 11
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORTS
In addition to the annual budget scenario, this report contains a comprehensive and complementary
assemblage of pavement management reports ranging from summary reports to annual maintenance and
rehabilitation schedules (Forecasted Maintenance Report, Section IV). Collectively as well as individually,
the reports represent reasonable projections of pavement maintenance needs and performance based
on visual condition assessments, unit cost estimates, and pavement deterioration models.
It is important to note that pavement segment dimensions and surface area (recorded during 1999-2016,
2019 inspections, along with the action and repair costs, as presented within the reports are accurate
within tolerable limits. This is noteworthy due to the "implied" accuracy of reporting length and width to
the nearest foot, surface area to the nearest square foot, and action and repair unit costs and project
estimates to the nearest penny and dollar, respectively.
NEXT STEPS
As with any infrastructure management software program, time investments need to be made by key
Public Works staff to maintain the integrity of the data as well as the accuracy. Bucknam can perform
training sessions in the use of the MicroPAVER system and demonstrate how to generate standard
maintenance reports to assist City staff in developing yearly budgets, project level analysis, and CIP
projections. This will be key to future staff management of the pavement program and reporting. City
personnel need to maintain their commitment to the preventive maintenance system, while working
toward reducing the City's present backlog of rehabilitation projects.
In order to ensure that report outputs are accurate and credible, it is essential that the integrity of all data
files be maintained. This will require performing all necessary updates when changes are made to
scheduling scenarios, unit cost information, historical data, etc.
In addition, the entire pavement network will have to be re-inventoried at regular intervals. This typically
includes surveying arterial every two years and locals every three. One recommendation the City may
consider to keep the program “managed” is”
• Survey half the arterials each year; and
• One-third of the locals each year
This will not only allow work to be scheduled based on the most current condition data available, but will
provide City personnel with a means to monitor actual rates of pavement deterioration so appropriate
modifications can be made to the system curves. To be compliant with the MTA requirements, the City
must generate a triennial Arterial network pavement management report indicating condition ratings.
Bucknam will be supporting the City with staff level support to assist in the continuous updates with the
MicroPAVER system. This will include work history updates, generating reports from the system, unit cost
updates, and future inspections.
B-40
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 12
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
CONDITION DISTRIBUTION REPORT
This report graphically depicts the distribution of the pavement condition throughout the street network
by area.
The condition scheme ranges from “Very Good” to “Very Poor”; with a “Very Good” condition
corresponding to a pavement at the beginning of its life cycle, and a “Very Poor” condition representing
a badly deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life.
The table below shows the general description for each pavement condition:
Condition Description – PCI Range - Description
Very Good (86-100) - Minor to low distress, no significant distress. Little distress, with the
exception of utility patches in good condition, or slight hairline cracks; may
be slightly weathered (City of Rancho Palos Verdes citywide weighted
average PCI is 88.9).
Good (75-85) - Slight to moderately weathered, slight distress, possibly patching
Fair (60-74) - Severely weathered or slight to moderate levels of distress, generally
limited to patches and non-load-related cracking.
Poor (41-59) - Moderate to severe distresses including load-related types, such as
alligator cracking.
Very Poor (0-40) - Severely distressed, large quantities of distortion or alligator cracking.
Failure of the pavement, distress has surpassed tolerable rehabilitation
limits.
B-41
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 13
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
Figure 7 – Arterial Condition Distribution
Figure 8 – Local Condition Distribution
B-42
PCI Distribution For Arterial Streets (by Section Mi.)
Poor; 1..2; 3 ,% Very P∨ 0.0; 0%
■ Very 1Good ■ Good ■ Fair ■ Poor ■ Very Poor
PCI Distribution For Local Streets (by Section Mi.)
Fair; 1.6; 2% Poor; 0 .1; 0%l/ r Very P.oor; 0 .1; 0%
■ Very 1Good ■ Good ■ Fair ■ Poor ■ Very Poor
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 14
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section II
CALCULATION OF PCI
In order to calculate a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) value within MicroPAVER, specific street section
data needs to be inputted into MicroPAVER to define the survey limits, asphalt types, pavement age and
metrics. Pavement “sections” are pavement segments within the defined branch that have consistent
pavement street classifications, construction/maintenance histories and use. Representative inspection
samples are then selected and visually surveyed to locate distress data. This data is used to calculate the
pavement sections Pavement Condition Index (PCI) which includes distress type, extent of the distress
and its severity.
The PCI is a condition rating that ranges from 100 (pavement section that is in perfect condition) to 0 for
a section that has structurally failed and deteriorated dramatically. The PCI is calculated from three major
data entries from our inspectors:
1. Distress Type (one of 20 AC or 19 PCC types); these include alligator cracking, bleeding, block
cracking, corrugations, depressions, long/trans cracking, patch/utility cut, potholes, rutting,
weathering, raveling, etc.
2. Distress Quantity (the square footage, length or count of a specific distress)
3. Distress Severity (the level of severity determined for each distress found; low, medium or
high)
Figure 9 – PCI Calculation Worksheet
B-43
;l)T PAVER 6.1.2 •
File Tables Preferences Add-Im Window Help
jj II Inventory • Work PC I ~ Reports 6 Pred . Modeling liilCond . Analysis ♦ M&R Plan 4i)GIS/Tree Set. ~List Sel. 6 Wiza"
~ Li st Se lector o lGJOO@J
Netw ork· !Arcadia 3 I City of Arcadia, CA 3
Branch: !ALBERT wY 3 IALBERTwY 3
Sec tion-1,000 3 From: I PALM AVE :::]To j wooDRUFF AVE 3
ffl PClArcad ia-ALBERT WY-1000 o lGJOO@J
Summary data at time of inspection
Branch Use: ROADWAY Section Surface Type: AC Section True Area· 22.605 SqFI
I Section Length : 685 Ft Section Width: 33 Ft
Inspection Date: 141 11200 5 3 .E_dit In spections I Detailed Inspection Commen!s I Calculate Conditions I
Samp le Unit: 1, 3 Edit Sample Units I
e 22605]5 ~ r NQ dist1esses found during inspection. Remaining Samples I ..... Have No Distress
Distress Type
r"--r♦ 01 ALLIGAT R ("' 06 DEPRESSIO N ( 11 PATCH /UT CUT r 16 SHOV ING
r 02 BL EEDING r 07 EDG E CR (" 12 PO LISHEO AG ("' 17 SLIPPAGE CR
("' OJ BLOCK CR (' 08 JT REF. CR (' 13 POTHOL E (' 18 SW ELL
(' 04 BUMPS/SAGS r 09 LANE SH DRO P (' 14 RR CROSS ING (' 19 W EATH/RAV EL
"'..,,,....,,1 ....... ,,,,.., ..... ~ r 10 L_TCR r ~ .......... f sire .. Se~••i';,J ,r. Low ('" Me ('" .tfigh < NLA I~''"" Duantily ' 2825.98 -:_p-
Distress Desc ription Severity Quanlit~ Unit s •I 8dd Distres s I
► 1 ALLIGATOR L 2.825.98 SqFI -J I 1 ALLIGATOR M 115. SqFI Qelete Distless
1 ALLIGATOR H 25. SqFI flepl ace Dis tress I 3 BLOCK L 12,432.9 SqFI
3 BLOCK M 1.016.99 SqFT
◄I I
Previous Sample Unit I Ne>-:t Sample Unit I Smp Images (0) I
ln se lmal;JeS 101 I ~ I
~
'
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 1
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section III
SECTION III
CITYWIDE
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX REPORT
A. PCI Map
B. A to Z
C. PCI Order
B-44
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 2
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section III
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX REPORT
Listed alphabetically by street name or PCI, this report provides the City with a listing of pertinent
inventory and pavement condition data for each inventory unit within the City's pavement network. The
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report notes the names, limits, classification, dimension, surface type,
and lane configuration of each inventory unit.
Detailed descriptions of the information appearing on this report are presented below:
BRANCH NAME - The name of each inventory unit appears in this column. Generally, the inventory unit
name is taken directly from a street sign; however, where no street signs are posted, the name appearing
on the network map is noted instead.
A sample set of street name suffix abbreviation definitions is presented below:
AV - Avenue CT - Court CIR - Circle
DR - Drive LN - Lane RD - Road
ST - Street WAY - Way EB - East Bound
NB - North Bound SB - South Bound WB - West Bound
FROM - A description of the beginning limit of each inventory unit appears in this column. If the beginning
limit exists between intersections, then the beginning limit description may be an address, post mile
marker, or a distance from a known point of reference (e.g., "500' N/MAIN ST").
TO - A description of the ending limit of each inventory unit appears in this column. Like BEGIN limit, the
END limit description may consist of a street name, an address, or a distance from a known point of
reference. In the case of cul-de-sacs, or dead-ends, the END limit consists of and address, or a directional
reference, such as "NORTH END," when no address is available.
RANK - The codes for the four functional classifications as the inventory unit appears in this column are
represented below. Basically, units are classified according to traffic volume.
CODE DESCRIPTION
A Arterial
C Collector
E Local
O Alley
SURFACE TYPE - A code was assigned to each inventory unit to describe surface type.
CODE DESCRIPTION
AC Asphalt Concrete
PCC Concrete
LENGTH - The length of the section within each branch.
B-45
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 3
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section III
UNITS - The unit of measurement for the section length, typically linear feet (LF).
AREA - The area of each section within a branch.
UNITS - The unit of measurement for the section area, typically square feet (SF).
PCI - Pavement Condition Indices were calculated for inventory units based on severity and extent of
distress manifestations observed within the inventory unit. Ranging between 0 and 100, a PCI of "100"
corresponds to a pavement at the beginning of its life cycle, while a PCI of "0" corresponds to a badly
deteriorated pavement which is at or near the end of its life cycle.
PCI CLIMATE, LOAD AND OTHER – reflects “Section Extrapolated Distress”; these values are shown within
the Sample Distresses tab within the PCI window. Distresses are aggregated based on the type and
severity level. For random samples, distress quantities are adjusted to reflect the extrapolated value
based on the sections total area. Extrapolated distress deducts are classified as resulting from Climate,
Load and Other distresses. The Distress Classification portion of the tab shows the “percent” of
extrapolated distress deduct belonging to Climate, Load and Other (these %’s are shown within the PCI
reports herein). These values are beneficial in that they support the decision whether recommend slurry
seal, overlay or reconstruction project for street sections.
INSPECTION DATE – Represents the most recent inspection date performed on a given sections. PCI
shown is historical in value and may not indicate what “today’s” PCI is due to variance in time. Pavement
deterioration calculations can be performed on a section(s) to demonstrate a deteriorated PCI based upon
a new current date.
B-46
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 4
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section III
Figure 10 – Rancho Palos Verdes PCI Map -2019
B-47~ ,i,el'-\'I' V•r~ p.. ~~<: '~statf• PalOI ·•, ·~··c., City of Rancho P;al9.~.:Verdes::c~ .. ,,. Pavement Condition •2019 '°'" ~ PCI Ranges -86 -1 00 (Very Good) · 75 -85 (Good) ·= 60 -74 (Fair) -41 -59 (Poor) --o -40 (Very Poor) 0 2,500 5,000 ---====:::J Feet \. \. ~ ·~.,, ·-~. ..,,.. ""po"' ....... "ti£~"'-!!, ... ' ~-·-\1" ... , T.:r,w., tig,1!,.'t 111 .. , .. ...,c... ,.,.~,._ ....... , f4'111I ..... _0,.1, Ftotllng Hlll1 Est.at•• _,,_ ... """'" c-,;, ! l <! ~-. '"'~"'· -<b • ._lf. H~1J-,~ • 1 -,~,·-~· •' ,i ---4--;---,i,-:.-.:::.._¾_....., • .._,\11!-<.tsH ' ,iv,,t~ -. A 'I. , d:J -.~ ~r; l ~ ,.,_,... .f f ............ ir. ... .. , 'hlrd~t t,, 14!h~I ~ ! ~f'I ... _, WI0,1 itil11ti.SI '111;9'1S.t ' Q;;l ""''rn ... ., ,J Wl41hf,I; ~ City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA Bucknam Infrastructure Group April 2019 Pavement Condition 2019 Source: City of Rancho Palos Verdes GIS Centertine Created in A.-cGIS 10.5
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 1
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section IV
SECTION IV
FORECASTED MAINTENANCE REPORT
A. Actual Budget / Forecasted Streets; Five Year Plan (2019-2024)
B-48
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 1
2019 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – April 18, 2019 Section IV
FORECASTED MAINTENANCE REPORT
Listed in chronological order by plan year, rank then alphabetically by street name, this report presents
the year and action corresponding to the next scheduled work activity for each segment within the
pavement network.
ACTUAL BUDGET – The Actual budget was generated for the City to demonstrate how the City’s 5-Year
Roadway Infrastructure funding allocation performs against the current citywide conditions.
• City’s Actual budget includes:
o Arterials projects (Crenshaw, Silverspur & Highridge were included within Arterial
projections)
o Local are funded at:
FY 2019-20 - $5,500,000 (Zone 5)
FY 2020-21 - $5,500,000 (Zones 9)
FY 2021-22 - $5,500,000 (Zone 8)
FY 2022-23 - $5,500,000 (Zones 3 & 4)
FY 2023-24 - $5,500,000 (Zone 1)
o Projects are funded through General Fund, Proposition C, STPL, & Measure R
The following report is sorted by Fiscal Year, then by Rank (functional classification), then by street name.
B-49
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCIArterials / Collectors1499 1676 Silverspur RdElkmont DrBaseball FieldAAC 1 1 1,305 26 33,9304/16/19 491499 1498 Silverspur RdBasswood Av S/s300' N of HawthorneAAC 1 1 61528 17,220 4/16/19 541497 1496 Highridge RdHawthorne BlRidgegate DrAAC 1 2 804 23 18,492 4/17/19 561497 1497 Highridge RdCity LimitsRidgegate DrAAC 1 2 1,318 26 34,268 4/17/19 561499 1799 Silverspur RdBaseball FieldBasewood AveAAC 1 1 940 26 24,4404/16/19 561497 1777 Highridge RdRidgegate DrCity LimitsAAC 2 2 1,315 23 30,245 4/17/19 591497 1778 Highridge RdRidgegate DrHawthorne BlvdAAC 2 2 793 26 20,618 4/17/19 611499 1801 Silverspur RdCity LimitsSilver Arrow DrAAC 1 4 1,558 26 40,508 4/12/19 661499 1499 Silverspur RdBaseball FieldElkmont DrAAC 1 1 1,305 26 33,9304/16/19 681389 1763 Crestridge RdBlemont VillageHighridge RdCAC 2 3 1,237 60 74,220 3/8/19 691499 1800 Silverspur RdSilver Arrow DrCity LimitsAAC 2 3 1,572 26 40,872 4/12/19 701238 1751 Montemalaga DrCity LimitsGrayslake RdCAC 1 1 1,737 21 36,4774/9/19 711432 1746 Palos Verdes Dr East 937' n/o Sunnyside Ridge Rd N Horseshoe LnAAC 2 5 1,571 32 50,272 4/11/19 711432 1747 Palos Verdes Dr East Horseshoe LnCity LimitsAAC 2 5 1,619 3251,808 4/11/19 711088 1088 Crenshaw BlvdSeacrestValley View Rd N/sAAC 2 4 1,330 42 55,860 4/17/19 721707 1495 Hawthorne BlvdVerde Ridge Rd N/sIndian Valley RdAAC 2 2 1,380 30 41,400 4/17/19 721448 1463 Palos Verdes Dr South Seahill Dr W/sCrestmont Ln W/sAAC 26 1,670 31 51,770 3/1/19 731687 1701 Crest RdCity LimitsCrenshaw Bl E/sCAC 2 4 1,360 48 65,280 4/17/19 741707 1775 Hawthorne BlvdIndian Valley RdOcean Crest DrAAC 2 2 981 30 29,430 4/17/19 741448 1453 Palos Verdes Dr South Portuguese Bend Nature Preserve West End of MedianAAC 2 6 1,140 34 38,760 4/16/19 761448 1455 Palos Verdes Dr South 100' E/Narcissa DrPeppertree Dr W/sAAC 2 6 1,385 34 47,090 4/16/19 761088 1089 Crenshaw BlvdValley View Rd N/sCrest Rd S/sAAC 2 4 605 60 36,300 4/17/19 771088 1830 Crenshaw BlvdIndian Peak RdCity LimitAAC 2 3 1,804 32 57,7284/17/19 781687 1709 Crest Rd30' w/o Hawthorne Bl100' e/o Hawthorne BlAPCC 4 5130 60 7,800 4/17/19 781448 1454 Palos Verdes Dr South Peppertree Dr W/sArchery RangeAAC 26 982 34 33,388 4/16/19 781499 1675 Silverspur Rd300' N of HawthorneBasswood Ave S/sAAC 3 1 615 28 17,220 4/16/19 781499 1798 Silverspur RdBasswood AvBaseball FieldAAC 2 1 936 26 24,336 4/16/19 781707 1674 Hawthorne Blvd50' N/Crest RdOcean Crest DrAAC 2 2 843 29 24,447 4/17/19 791707 1772 Hawthorne BlvdIndian Valley RdVerde Ridge RdAAC 2 2 1,400 29 40,600 4/17/19 791448 1464 Palos Verdes Dr South Crestmont Ln W/sSeahill Dr W/sAAC 26 1,670 27 45,090 4/16/19 791707 1708 Hawthorne Blvd300' n/o Crest Rd50' s/o Crest RdAPCC 3 2 350 30 10,500 4/17/19 801448 1462 Palos Verdes Dr South Seahill Dr W/sBarkentine Rd E/sAAC2 6 1,432 29 41,528 4/16/19 801088 1413 Crenshaw BlvdCrest Rd S/sCrestridge Rd N/sAAC 2 4 1,780 32 56,960 4/17/19 811687 1710 Crest RdAC 290' E/O Hawthorne Bl AC 30' W/O Hawthorne BlAPCC 2 5 420 40 16,800 4/17/19 811238 1750 Montemalaga DrGrayslake RdCity LimitsCAC 1 1 1,737 21 36,4774/9/19 811088 1650 Crenshaw BlvdBurrel LnSeacrestAAC 2 4 306 29 8,874 3/8/19 821687 1420 Crest RdHighridge RdWhitley Collins DrAAC 4 4 1,937 28 54,236 4/17/19 821707 1776 Hawthorne BlvdOcean Crest Dr300' n/o Crest RdAAC 2 2 583 3017,490 4/17/19 821432 1427 Palos Verdes Dr East Colt Rd (Private)Clevis Rd S/sAAC 3 71,100 60 66,000 4/9/19 821432 1673 Palos Verdes Dr East Coach Rd S/sRaon Dr S/sAAC 2 7 1,165 3237,280 4/11/19 821448 1465 Palos Verdes Dr South Crestmont Ln W/sTrail Entrace/DrivewayAAC 2 5 1,960 30 58,800 3/1/19 821448 1739 Palos Verdes Dr South Archery RangePortuguese Bend Nature Preserve AAC 2 6 2,256 34 76,704 4/16/19 821687 1731 Crest RdWhitley Collins DrCrenshaw BlvdAAC 2 3 1,519 28 42,532 4/17/19 831687 1743 Crest RdCanal AvLa Croix DrAAC 4 3 1,703 28 47,684 4/17/19 831707 1771 Hawthorne BlvdOcean Crest DrIndian Valley RdAAC 2 2 986 29 28,594 4/17/19 83Page 1 of 20B-50
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1238 1238 Montemalaga DrSilverspur RdBasswood Av E/sCAC 1 1 1,350 21 28,350 4/16/19 831432 1424 Palos Verdes Dr East Headland DrSunnyside Ridge Rd NAAC 27 1,436 32 45,952 4/11/19 831448 1461 Palos Verdes Dr South Seacove Dr W/sBarkentine RdAAC 2 6 1,071 34 36,414 4/16/19 831088 1414 Crenshaw BlvdCrestridge Rd N/sIndian Peak RdAAC 2 4 555 34 18,870 4/17/19 841088 1418 Crenshaw BlvdIndian Peak Rd S/sCrestridge Rd N/sAAC 2 4 580 32 18,560 4/17/19 841088 1419 Crenshaw BlvdCrestridge Rd N/sCrest Rd S/sAAC 2 4 1,840 34 62,560 4/17/19 841687 1732 Crest RdWhitley Collins DrHighridge RdAAC 4 3 1,928 29 55,912 4/17/19 841707 1707 Hawthorne Blvd300' s/o Crest Rd50' n/o Crest RdAPCC 3 5 350 30 10,500 4/17/19 841432 1423 Palos Verdes Dr East Sunnyside Ridge Rd N937' n/o Sunnyside Ridge Rd N AAC 2 7 937 32 131,840 4/11/19 841448 1790 Palos Verdes Dr South Barkentine RdSeahill DrAAC 2 6 1,459 34 49,606 4/16/19 841088 1857 Crenshaw BlvdCity LimitsIndian Peak RdAAC 2 3 1,815 34 61,710 4/17/19 851687 1415 Crest RdCrenshaw Bl W/sWhitley Collins DrAAC 2 4 1,522 29 44,138 4/17/19 851687 1422 Crest RdPCC 100' E/O Hawthorne Bl La Croix DrAAC 2 5 1,626 28 45,528 4/17/19 851687 1730 Crest RdLa Croix DrCanal AvAAC 2 3 1,723 28 48,244 4/17/19 851432 1426 Palos Verdes Dr East Clevis Rd S/sCoach Rd S/sAAC 2 7 1,25532 40,160 4/9/19 851448 1458 Palos Verdes Dr South Wayfarers Chapel W/sSeacove Dr W/sAAC 2 6 1,575 34 53,550 4/16/19 851448 1468 Palos Verdes Dr South Trail Entrace/DrivewayCoast Guard StationAAC 2 5 1,960 28 54,880 3/1/19 851432 1425 Palos Verdes Dr East Roan Dr S/sHeadland DrAAC 2 7 1,561 32 49,952 4/11/19 861238 1239 Montemalaga DrBasswood AvGrayslake RdCAC 2 1 1,060 21 22,2604/16/19 871238 1753 Montemalaga DrBasswood AvSilverspur RdCAC 1 1 1,363 21 28,623 4/16/19 871448 1449 Palos Verdes Dr South Conqueror Dr W/sSchooner Dr E/sAAC2 6 1,785 16 28,560 4/16/19 871448 1456 Palos Verdes Dr South 100' E/Narcissa DrWayfarers Chapel W/sAAC 4 6 1,820 28 50,960 4/16/19 871473 1469 Palos Verdes Dr West Coast Guard StationGolden CoveAAC 2 51,583 30 47,490 3/1/19 871687 1416 Crest RdHighridge RdCountry Meadow Rd WAAC 2 4 1,540 31 47,740 4/17/19 881687 1417 Crest RdLa Croix DrPCC 290' E/Hawthorne BlvdAAC 2 4 1,374 28 38,472 4/17/19 881389 1390 Crestridge RdCrenshaw Bl E/SBelmont VillageCAC 2 4 1,476 6088,560 3/8/19 881448 1459 Palos Verdes Dr South Seacove Dr W/sWayfarers Chapel W/sAAC 2 6 1,575 27 42,525 4/16/19 881707 1482 Hawthorne BlvdDupre Dr N/sRhone Dr S/sAAC 2 5 1,935 32 61,920 4/15/19 891432 1434 Palos Verdes Dr East Via Colinita N/sVia Frascati N/sAAC2 7 765 32 24,480 3/14/19 891432 1438 Palos Verdes Dr East Crest RdCalle AventuraAAC 4 7 1,260 54 68,040 3/14/19 891473 1470 Palos Verdes Dr West Golden CoveCoast Guard StationAAC 2 51,650 28 46,200 4/16/19 891473 1473 Palos Verdes Dr West Hawthorne BlvdRue BeaupreAAAC 2 5 867 36 33,612 4/10/19 891473 1475 Palos Verdes Dr West City LimitsCalle EntraderoAAC 2 5 2,141 25 53,525 4/10/19 891707 1484 Hawthorne Blvd50' S/Crest RdRhone Dr S/sAAC 2 5 1,335 30 40,050 4/17/19 901238 1752 Montemalaga DrGrayslake RdBasswood AvCAC 1 1 1,018 21 21,3784/16/19 901432 1439 Palos Verdes Dr East Ganado DrCrest RdAAC 4 7 2,427 55 142,901 3/14/19 901432 1440 Palos Verdes Dr East 350' S/Ganado DrGanado DrAAC 2 7 350 3411,900 3/11/19 901448 1466 Palos Verdes Dr South Parking Lot DrivewayCrestmont Ln W/sAAAC 2 5 2,234 26 58,084 4/16/19 901473 1474 Palos Verdes Dr West Berry Hill DrCity LimitsAAAC 2 5 1,68037 62,160 4/10/19 901687 1421 Crest RdCountry Meadow Rd W Highridge RdAAC 2 4 1,515 28 42,420 4/17/19 911432 1432 Palos Verdes Dr East Picardie RdColt Rd (private)AAC 2 7 1,345 32 43,040 4/9/19 911432 1436 Palos Verdes Dr East Diamonte LnVia Subida S/sAAC 2 7 1,71532 54,880 3/14/19 911432 1738 Palos Verdes Dr East Look Out Point #1Look Out Point #2AAC 2 7 875 32 28,000 3/11/19 911448 1457 Palos Verdes Dr South Wayfarers Chapel W/s100' E/Narcissa DrAAC 2 6 1,820 24 43,680 4/16/19 911448 1467 Palos Verdes Dr South Coast Guard StationParking Lot DrivewayAAC 4 5 1,769 28 49,532 4/16/19 911473 1471 Palos Verdes Dr West Golden CoveHawthorne Bl N/sAAC 2 5 94340 37,720 3/1/19 911687 1688 Crest RdGanado DrAvenida De RosaCAC 2 7 2,027 22 44,594 3/13/19 92Page 2 of 20B-51
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1687 1726 Crest RdPaseo De PinoCity LimitsCAC 2 6 430 22 9,460 3/13/19 921707 1477 Hawthorne BlvdPalos Verdes DrVia CapriAAAC 2 5 1,198 35 41,930 3/1/19 921707 1478 Hawthorne BlvdCity Hall EntranceBreak in Median (1,033' e/o)AAAC 2 5 1,033 30 30,990 3/1/19 921707 1479 Hawthorne BlvdVallon Dr N/sBreak in MedianAAAC 2 5 1,977 3161,287 4/16/19 921707 1483 Hawthorne BlvdRhone Dr S/s300' S/Crest RdAAC 2 5 1,080 36 38,880 4/17/19 921707 1485 Hawthorne BlvdRhone Dr S/sDupre Dr S/sAAC 2 5 2,055 31 63,705 4/15/19 921707 1492 Hawthorne BlvdHighridge Bl WbRidgegate Dr S/sAAAC 4 1 1,970 30 59,100 4/16/19 921707 1744 Hawthorne BlvdBreak in MedianVallon DrAAC 2 5 1,977 30 59,310 3/1/19 921432 1435 Palos Verdes Dr East Via Subida S/sVia Colinita N/sAAC 2 71,235 32 39,520 3/14/19 921432 1441 Palos Verdes Dr East Look Out Point #2Look Out Point #3AAC 2 7 4,030 32 128,960 3/11/19 921432 1740 Palos Verdes Dr East Picardie RdMiraleste PlazaAAC 2 6 1,490 32 47,680 3/15/19 921432 1789 Palos Verdes Dr East Look Out Point #3350' S/Ganado DrAAC 2 6 1,025 34 34,850 3/11/19 921448 1450 Palos Verdes Dr South Schooner Dr E/sWest End of MedianAAC 2 6 1,340 16 21,440 3/7/19 921473 1737 Palos Verdes Dr West Rue BeaupreBerry Hill DrAAC 2 5 2,849 36 102,564 4/10/19 921278 1714 Ridgegate DrRidgecove CtHawthorne BlvdCAC 2 2 1,550 36 55,800 4/16/19 921707 1480 Hawthorne BlvdVia CapriPalos Verdes DrAAAC 2 5 1,220 37 45,140 4/16/19 931707 1488 Hawthorne BlvdSeamount Dr N/sSan Nicholas DrAAAC 2 2 1,23932 39,648 4/16/19 931707 1745 Hawthorne BlvdBreak in MedianCity Hall EntranceAAC 2 5 1,022 31 31,682 4/16/19 931707 1767 Hawthorne BlvdVia CapriCity Hall EntranceAAC 2 5 1,501 35 52,535 3/1/19 931707 1773 Hawthorne BlvdSan Nicholas DrRidgegate DrAAC 2 2 1,186 32 49,600 4/16/19 931707 1774 Hawthorne BlvdSan Nicholas DrSeamount DrAAC 2 2 1,236 31 38,316 4/16/19 931432 1433 Palos Verdes Dr East Via Frascati N/sMiraleste PlazaAAC 27 1,686 26 43,836 3/15/19 931432 1437 Palos Verdes Dr East Calle AventuraDiamonte LnAAC 3 7 735 5338,955 3/14/19 931432 1442 Palos Verdes Dr East Palos Verdes Dr SouthLook Out Point #1AAC 2 7 1,480 32 47,360 3/11/19 931448 1460 Palos Verdes Dr South Barkentine Rd E/sSeacove Dr W/sAAC2 6 1,085 56 60,760 4/16/19 931473 1472 Palos Verdes Dr West Hawthorne BlGolden CoveAAC 2 5 898 27 24,246 4/16/19 931687 1725 Crest RdAvenida De RosaPaseo De PinoCAC 2 6 2,125 22 46,750 3/13/19 941707 1486 Hawthorne BlvdDupre Dr N/sVallon Dr N/sAAAC 2 5 2,015 29 58,435 4/15/19 941707 1487 Hawthorne BlvdVerde Ridge Rd N/sSeamount Dr N/sAAAC 2 2 1,435 34 48,790 4/16/19 941707 1490 Hawthorne BlvdHighridge RdWoodbrook RdAAAC 2 1 900 31 27,9004/16/19 941707 1493 Hawthorne BlvdRidgegate Dr S/sSan Nicholas DrAAAC 2 2 1,204 31 37,324 4/16/19 941707 1769 Hawthorne BlvdWoodbrook RdIndian Peak RdAAC 2 2 1,350 31 41,850 4/16/19 941707 1770 Hawthorne BlvdIndian Peak RdWoodbrook RdAAC 2 2 1,370 32 43,840 4/16/19 941448 1448 Palos Verdes Dr South Aqua Vista DrConqueror Dr W/sAAC 3 7525 52 27,300 4/16/19 941448 1451 Palos Verdes Dr South West End of MedianSchooner Dr E/sAAC 2 6 1,340 16 21,440 4/16/19 941448 1452 Palos Verdes Dr South Schooner Dr E/sConqueror Dr W/sAAC1 6 1,780 16 28,480 4/16/19 941707 1481 Hawthorne BlvdVallon Dr N/sDupre Dr N/sAAAC 2 5 2,015 32 64,480 4/15/19 951707 1489 Hawthorne BlvdRidgegate Dr S/sHighridge Rd N/sAAAC 2 1 1,970 32 63,040 4/16/19 951707 1494 Hawthorne BlvdSeamount Dr N/sVerde Ridge Rd N/sAAAC 2 2 1,427 30 42,810 4/16/19 951707 1686 Hawthorne BlvdCity Limits1200' S/O City LimitsAAC 2 3 1,200 31 37,200 4/16/19 951473 1736 Palos Verdes Dr West Rue BeaupreHawthorne BlvdAAC 2 5 861 2626,741 4/10/19 951278 1278 Ridgegate DrHighridge Rd W/sRidgecove CtCAC 2 2 1,007 36 36,252 4/16/19 951707 1491 Hawthorne BlvdWoodbrook RdGrayslake RdAAAC 2 1 901 32 28,8324/16/19 961707 1718 Hawthorne Blvd1087' N/O Silverspur Rd Blackhorse RdAAC 2 31,087 31 33,697 4/16/19 961707 1719 Hawthorne Blvd1200' S/O City LimitsBlackhorse DrAAC 2 3 1,200 31 37,200 4/16/19 961707 1720 Hawthorne BlvdBlackhorse Dr1079' S/O BlackhorseAAC 2 3 1,079 31 33,449 4/16/19 961707 1768 Hawthorne BlvdCity Hall EntranceVia CapriAAC 2 5 1,486 37 54,982 4/16/19 96Page 3 of 20B-52
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1428 1428 Miraleste Dr EbPalos Verdes DrVia BramanteAAC 4 8 515 40 20,600 3/13/19 961448 1443 Palos Verdes Dr South City LimitsLa Rotonda Dr W/sAAC 2 7 1,535 32 49,120 3/11/19 961473 1476 Palos Verdes Dr West Calle EntraderoRue BeaupreAAC 2 5 2,409 26 62,634 4/16/19 961687 1687 Crest RdPalos Verdes Dr1115' N/O Palos Verdes DrCAC 4 7 1,115 61 68,015 3/14/19 971687 1722 Crest Rd1115' N/O Palos Verdes Dr Deluna DrCAC 4 6 1,115 61 68,015 3/15/19 971687 1723 Crest RdDeluna DrLucania DrCAC 4 6 638 61 38,918 3/15/19 971687 1724 Crest RdLucania DrGanado DrCAC 4 6 1,043 61 63,623 3/13/19 971707 1685 Hawthorne Blvd1193' N/O Blackhorse Rd City LimitsAAC 2 3 1,193 31 36,983 4/16/19 971707 1716 Hawthorne BlvdBlackhorse Rd1193' N/O Blackhorse RdAAC 2 31,193 31 36,983 4/16/19 971707 1717 Hawthorne BlvdSilverspur Rd1087' N/O Silverspur RdAAC 2 31,087 31 33,697 4/16/19 971707 1721 Hawthorne Blvd1079' S/O Blackhorse Dr Silverspur RdAAC 2 31,079 31 33,449 4/16/19 971431 1733 Miraleste Dr WbNancy RdPalos Verdes DrAAC 1 8 1,432 30 42,960 3/14/19 971448 1444 Palos Verdes Dr South La Rotonda Dr W/sPalos Verdes Dr East W/sAAC 1 7 1,175 19 22,325 3/11/19 971448 1445 Palos Verdes Dr South Palos Verdes Dr East W/s Seacliff Dr W/sAAC 2 6 1,825 16 29,200 3/11/19 971448 1852 Palos Verdes Dr South Palos Verdes Dr East W/s La Rotonda Dr W/sAAC 1 7 1,175 20 23,500 3/11/19 971448 1853 Palos Verdes Dr South Aqua Vista DrSeacliff Dr W/sAAC 1 7 1,475 17 27,075 4/16/19 971430 1430 Miraleste DrVia ColinitaCity LimitsAAC 4 8 1,165 64 74,560 3/14/19 981428 1429 Miraleste Dr EbVia Bramante W/sVia SienaAAC 2 8 1,954 30 58,620 3/13/19 981428 1786 Miraleste Dr EbVia SienaVia ColnitaAAC 2 8 634 30 19,020 3/14/19 981431 1431 Miraleste Dr WbVia ColinitaNancy RdAAC 2 8 1,916 30 57,480 3/14/19 981448 1446 Palos Verdes Dr South Seacliff Dr W/sPalos Verdes Dr East W/sAAC 1 7 1,795 14 25,130 4/16/19 981448 1447 Palos Verdes Dr South Seacliff Dr W/sAqua Vista DrAAC 1 7 1,475 17 32,235 4/16/19 981499 1223 Silverspur RdElkmontCity LimitsAAC 2 1 61 27 1,647 4/16/19 991657 1657 Miraleste PlazaPalos Verdes DrMiraleste DrAAC 2 3 300 65 19,500 3/14/19 10041.56,997,925Locals1860 1831 Highridge Rd (Frontage Rd) Highridge RdEndEAC 2 2 342 33 11,286 4/16/19 331632 1635 Gunter RdMendon DrEndEAC 2 3 195 44 8,580 4/15/19 461877 1851 Lunada CirPeninsula Verde DrEndEAC 280 34 3,595 4/15/19 631275 1275 Lightfoot PlHyte RdEndEAC 2 1 540 28 16,270 4/9/19 661388 1388 Robinview LnMiddlecrest RdEndEAC 2 4 262 24 6,288 3/8/19 701023 1806 Vallon Dr1249' w/o Via La Cresta Via La Cresta RdEAC 2 5 1,000 31 31,000 3/1/19 701024 1025 Via La CrestaVallon Dr E/sEndEAC 2 5 255 28 8,390 3/1/19 701245 1245 Ashfork PlIronwood StEndEAC 2 1 275 28 8,800 4/9/19 711389 1385 Crestridge RdMiddlecrest Rd N/S1441' e/o Middlecrest RdEAC 2 4 1,441 20 28,820 3/8/19 711212 1854 Indian Peak RdCrenshaw BlvdCity LimitEAC 21,900 37 70,300 4/17/19 711250 1250 Mossbank DrSpringcreek RdGrayslake Rd W/sEAC 2 1 625 34 21,250 4/9/19 721618 1618 Bandra PlRedondela DrEndEAC 2 3 160 42 6,720 3/15/19 731255 1255 Groveoak PlGrayslake RdSpringcreek RdEAC 2 1 950 33 31,350 4/9/19 731386 1386 Meadowdale LnCrestridge RdEndEAC 2 4 460 23 10,580 3/8/19 731081 1081 Moonmist DrCoveview DrEndEAC 2 4 130 24 3,120 3/8/19 731269 1269 Rio Linda DrCenturia DrEast EndEAC 2 2 170 30 6,200 4/8/19 741071 1071 Whitley Collins DrCrest Rd S/sGateEAC 2 4 233 55 13,165 4/16/19 741875 1849 Penninsula Verde Dr Western AveEndEAC 21,470 36 52,730 4/15/19 75Page 4 of 20B-53
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1636 1636 Ronsard RdMendon DrEnrose AvEAC 2 3 735 26 19,110 4/15/19 751689 1689 Via ColladoVia CambronEndEAC 2 5 125 36 4,700 4/10/19 751253 1253 Birchmont DrGrayslake RdMenominee PlEAC 2 1 250 26 6,500 4/9/19 761086 1086 Park PlCrenshaw BlEndEAC 2 4 465 26 12,950 3/8/19 761338 1338 Seaspray DrLocklenna LnEndEAC 2 2 150 39 6,950 3/12/19 761614 1755 Avenida AprendaAvenida CuadernoWestern AveEAC 2 9 1,172 32 37,504 3/15/19 771050 1050 Avenida SelectaAvenida EsplendidaEndEAC 2 5 503 23 12,669 4/15/19 771343 1343 Kings Harbor DrEl Rodeo RdEast EndEAC 2 2 600 29 17,400 3/12/19 771230 1230 Shoreview DrBasswood AvEndEAC 2 1 735 29 22,465 3/28/19 771023 1805 Vallon DrVia La Cresta1249' w/o Via La CrestaEAC 2 5 1,24931 38,719 3/1/19 771024 1024 Via La CrestaVallon Dr1041' w/o Vallon DrEAC 2 5 1,041 36 37,476 3/1/19 771064 1064 Calle QuietaAvenida De CalmaEndEAC 2 5 160 40 7,550 4/15/19 781246 1246 Capeswood DrIronwood StGrayslake RdEAC 2 1 802 26 20,852 4/9/19 781560 1560 Upland StNoble View DrNoble View DrEAC 2 3 953 32 30,496 3/29/19 781087 1087 Valley View RdCrenshaw BlEndEAC 2 4 1,615 25 40,725 3/8/19 781023 1023 Vallon DrHawthorne BlVia La CrestaEAC 2 5 202 31 6,262 3/1/19781340 1340 Windport DrLocklenna LnEndEAC 2 2 155 29 4,495 3/12/19 781054 1054 Avenida RefindaCrest RdEndEAC 2 5 200 47 10,550 4/15/19 791626 1626 Calzada DrMontereina DrEndEAC 2 3 365 32 11,680 4/11/19 791389 1762 Crestridge Rd1441' e/o Middlecrest Rd EndEAC 2 3 1,126 20 22,520 3/8/19 791556 1556 Highmore AvMacarthur StEndEAC 2 3 195 32 6,240 3/29/19 791273 1274 Hyte RdGroveoak Pl E/sLightfoot PlEAC 2 1 615 32 19,680 4/9/19791002 1002 Rue LangloisRue BeaupreSouth EndEAC 2 5 735 26 20,260 4/10/19791565 1697 Trotwood AvFairhill Dr S/sEndEAC 2 3 230 26 5,980 3/29/19 791024 1808 Via La Cresta1041' w/o Vallon DrVallon DrEAC 2 5 1,000 36 36,000 3/1/19 791617 1617 Alvesta PlRedondela DrEndEAC 2 3 150 41 6,150 3/15/19 801341 1341 Baycrest DrLoclenna LaneEndEAC 2 2 135 35 5,825 3/12/19 801876 1850 Circle Verde DrPaninsula Verde DrEndEAC 2308 32 10,600 4/15/19 801207 1210 Hawthorne Blvd (Frontage Rd) Woodbrook RdShorewood RdEAC2 1 870 24 20,880 4/8/19 801387 1387 Middlecrest RdCrestridge Rd S/sEndEAC 2 4 1,850 20 37,000 3/8/19 801068 1068 Ocean Terrace DrPacifica DrEast EndEAC 2 4 1,544 32 50,508 3/7/19 801665 1665 Rock Park DrKings Harbor DrEndEAC 2 2 105 26 2,730 3/12/19 801506 1506 Scotsview DrSeabryn DrEndEAC 2 2 300 29 9,950 4/17/19 801247 1247 Via SonomaCity LimitsEast EndEAC 2 1 875 26 23,850 4/9/19 801611 1611 Avenida CuadernoAvd AprendaAvd EstudianteEAC 2 3 1,050 32 33,600 4/11/19 811623 1756 Avenida FelicianoAvenida Del MesaEndEAC 2 9 459 27 12,393 3/15/19 811579 1579 Elberon StBayend DrFairhill DrEAC 2 3 820 26 21,320 3/29/19 811627 1628 Galerita DrMontereina Dr E/sDelasonde DrEAC 2 3 795 26 20,670 4/11/19 811228 1244 Ironwood StGrayslake rdEndEAC 2 1 1,120 32 36,990 4/9/19 811040 1040 Lautrec PlCartier DrEndEAC 2 5 460 26 13,110 3/1/19 811070 1070 Pacifica DrOcean TerEndEAC 2 4 660 32 22,320 3/8/19 811242 1242 Barkstone DrWildbriar Dr W/sEndEAC 2 1 740 29 22,560 4/9/19 821578 1578 Bernice DrGeneral StGeneral StEAC 2 3 1,020 34 34,680 3/29/19821237 1237 Birchfield AvIronwood StBayridge RdEAC 2 1 1,760 32 56,320 4/16/19 821262 1262 Clint PlGrayslake RdEndEAC 2 1 420 33 14,960 4/9/19 821339 1339 Driftwood LnLocklenna LnEndEAC 2 2 200 35 7,000 3/12/19 821342 1342 Faircove DrLocklenna LnEndEAC 2 2 490 28 14,870 3/12/19 82Page 5 of 20B-54
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1260 1260 Finecrest DrFlambeau RdGrayslake RdEAC 2 1 1,120 26 29,120 4/9/19 821220 1220 Mazur DrBasswood AvEndEAC 2 1 600 29 18,550 3/28/19 821078 1079 Oceanaire Dr500'W/Amber SkyEndEAC 2 4 1,920 24 46,080 3/8/19 821609 1609 Pontevedra DrDelasondre Dr N/sAvd Estudiante N/sEAC 2 3 575 32 18,400 3/15/19 821069 1069 Sea Ridge CirOcean Ter S/sEndEAC 2 4 340 32 12,080 3/8/19 821393 1410 Sunmist DrWest EndEast EndEAC 2 4 895 35 31,325 4/16/19 821077 1077 Amber Sky DrOceanaire Dr S/sEndEAC 2 4 910 20 18,200 3/8/19 831614 1614 Avenida AprendaMontereina DrAvenida CuadernoEAC 2 3 1,201 34 40,834 3/15/19 831242 1243 Barkstone DrWildbriar Dr W/sIronwood StEAC 2 1 630 26 16,3804/9/19 831080 1080 Coveview DrOceanaire DrEndEAC 2 4 1,140 24 27,360 3/8/19 831557 1557 General StCrestwood St S/sBayend Dr E/sEAC 2 3 1,000 32 32,000 3/29/19 831557 1577 General StBayend Dr E/sEnrose AvEAC 2 3 1,585 32 50,720 3/29/19 831240 1252 Grayslake RdMossbank Dr S/SNorth EndEAC 2 1 1,460 32 47,870 4/9/19 831228 1228 Ironwood StSilverspur RdBirchfield Av N/sEAC 2 1 500 32 16,000 4/16/19 831874 1848 Lasita PlAvenida CuadernoEndEAC 2260 24 9,475 4/15/19 831068 1735 Ocean Terrace DrWest EndPacifica DrEAC 2 3 1,787 32 58,284 3/8/19 831870 1841 Pacifica Del MarCalle VientoEndEAC 2620 30 20,830 4/15/19 831810 1823 Valleta DrDelasonde DrPontevedra DrEAC 2 9 978 30 29,340 4/11/19 831607 1608 Velez DrMontereina Dr E/sPontevedra DrEAC 2 3 683 26 17,758 4/11/19 831883 1856 Via RafaelSpringcreek RdCity LimitEAC 2140 30 4,200 4/17/19831625 1625 Alaflora DrMontereina DrEndEAC 2 3 550 30 16,500 4/11/19 841502 1502 Alto CircleDoverridge DriveEndEAC 2 2 105 42 5,660 4/17/19 841056 1056 Avenida AnilloCrest RoadEndEAC 2 5 300 32 10,750 4/15/19 841057 1057 Avenida EleganteCrest RdEndEAC 2 5 850 24 20,400 4/15/19 841389 1389 Crestridge RdMiddlecrest Rd N/SCrenshaw Bl W/SEAC 2 4 225 45 10,125 3/8/19 841538 1538 Crownview DrPalos Verdes DrKnoll View DrEAC 2 3 1,062 32 33,984 3/15/19 841603 1603 Delasonde DrMontereina DrEndEAC 2 3 270 40 10,800 4/11/19 841234 1234 Elmbank RdBasswood AvBirchfield AvEAC 2 1 870 26 22,620 4/16/19 841207 1264 Hawthorne Blvd (Frontage Rd) Grayslake RdAlvarez DrEAC 2 11,130 24 27,120 4/8/19 841563 1563 Homeworth DrTrudie Dr S/sEndEAC 2 3 340 33 11,220 3/29/19 841554 1555 Mac Arthur StBayend Dr W/sCrestwood StEAC 2 3 1,360 32 43,520 3/29/19 841027 1027 Marne DrVallon Dr S/sEndEAC 2 5 620 24 15,980 3/1/19 841254 1254 Menominee PlSouth EndNorth EndEAC 2 1 890 35 33,350 4/9/19 841609 1847 Pontevedra DrSanta Rena DrDelasonde DrEAC 2825 32 27,220 4/15/19 841038 1039 Rhone DrCartier Dr N/sHawthorne BlEAC 2 5 745 32 23,840 3/8/19841058 1058 Avenida AltisimaCrest RdEndEAC 2 5 1,100 24 27,550 4/15/19 851047 1047 Avenida EsplendidaCrest RdEndEAC 2 5 180 50 10,150 4/15/19 851623 1623 Avenida FelicianoTarraso DrAvenida Del MesaEAC 2 3 1,711 2746,197 3/15/19 851053 1053 Avenida MagnificaCrest RdEndEAC 2 5 200 25 6,150 4/15/19 851111 1109 Barkentine RdSeacove DrPalos Verdes DrEAAC 2 6 905 26 19,8903/7/19 851558 1558 Bayend DrMacarthur St S/sCrestwood St N/sEAC 2 3 815 32 26,080 3/29/19 851629 1589 Caddington DrThistlewood WyMt Sawtooth DrEAC 2 9 1,252 36 45,321 4/15/19 851575 1641 Enrose AvSparta Dr N/sCaddington Dr N/sEAC 2 3 715 32 22,8804/15/19 851240 1240 Grayslake RdMonte Malaga DrWildbriar DrEAC 2 1 1,040 32 33,280 4/9/19 851526 1527 King Arthur CtArmaga Spring Rd E/SSouth EndEAC 2 2 950 30 29,650 4/17/19 851597 1601 Montereina DrToscanini Dr N/sAvd EstudianteEAC 2 3 1,565 3250,080 4/11/19 851592 1592 Mt Lassen LnCaddington DrEndEAC 2 3 650 33 21,450 4/15/19 85Page 6 of 20B-55
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1584 1584 Mt Rushmore RdBloomwood RdMt Rainer RdEAC 2 3 690 32 22,080 4/11/19 851590 1590 Mt Sawtooth DrToscanini DrEndEAC 2 3 825 32 26,400 4/15/19 851165 1165 Newridge DrStarline Dr3459 Newridge DrEAC 2 7 590 25 14,750 3/13/19 851405 1405 Oceanport RdScotwood DrEndEAC 2 4 400 26 11,650 4/16/19 851609 1610 Pontevedra DrAvd Estudiante N/sAvd AprendaEAC 2 3 1,165 26 30,290 3/15/19 851099 1099 Sandy Point CtSeahill DrEndEAC 2 6 540 29 16,810 3/1/19 851605 1606 Santa Rena DrMontereina Dr W/sEndEAC 2 3 1,160 26 30,160 4/11/19 851107 1713 Seacove DrWest EndBerkentineEAAC 2 6 650 36 23,400 3/7/19 851638 1638 Sparta DrEnrose AvAtford DrEAC 2 3 178 32 5,696 4/15/19 851704 1704 Via Porto Grande120's/Armaga SpringsEndEAC 2 2 700 30 21,0004/17/19 851071 1672 Whitley Collins DrNorthbay Rd N/sWhitecliff DR S/sEAC 2 41,678 46 77,188 4/16/19 851044 1044 Alta Vista DrAlta Vista Drive6863 Alta Vista DriveEAC 2 51,300 42 54,600 3/7/19 861059 1059 Avenida De CalmaCrest RoadCamino PorvenirEAC 2 5 1,300 31 40,300 4/15/19 861622 1622 Avenida Del MesaRedondela DrAvd FelicianoEAC 2 3 700 28 19,600 3/15/19 861602 1602 Avenida EstudianteMontereina DrPontevedra DrEAC 2 3 1,065 33 35,145 4/11/19 861055 1055 Avenida TranquilaCrest RoadEndEAC 2 5 1,665 30 51,100 4/15/19 861233 1233 Basswood AvMonte Magala Dr N/sNorth EndEAC 2 1 1,865 32 60,830 4/16/19 861235 1235 Bayridge RdBasswood AvEndEAC 2 1 1,635 28 46,930 4/16/19 861309 1310 Birchman DrBraidwood DrEndEAC 2 2 300 29 8,700 3/12/19 861521 1521 Coveridge DrCovecrest DrEndEAC 2 2 990 28 28,970 4/17/19 861084 1084 Crestwind DrOceanaire DrEndEAC 2 4 1,047 20 20,940 3/8/19 861500 1501 Doverridge DrStadia Hill LnSeamount DrEAC 2 2 1,965 32 62,880 4/17/19 861575 1637 Enrose AvRonsard RdSparta Dr N/sEAC 2 3 285 26 7,410 4/15/19 861553 1553 Fairhill DrGeneral StEnrose AvEAC 2 3 865 32 27,680 3/29/19 861343 1344 Kings Harbor DrEl Rodeo RdVerde Ridge RdEAC 2 2 1,730 26 44,980 3/12/19 861586 1586 Mt Hood CtBloomwood RdEndEAC 2 3 525 28 14,700 4/11/19 861588 1588 Mt Palomar PlToscanini DrCaddington DrEAC 2 3 660 35 23,100 4/15/19 861583 1583 Mt Rainer RdMt Shasta DrMt Rose RdEAC 2 3 975 32 31,200 4/11/19 861582 1582 Mt Rose RdMt Rainer RdBloomwood RdEAC 2 3 765 32 24,480 4/11/19 861580 1580 Mt Shasta Dr50'n/mt RainerBloomwood RdEAC 2 3 900 36 32,400 4/11/19 861561 1561 Noble View DrEnrose AvBayend DrEAC 2 3 1,400 32 44,800 3/29/19861400 1408 Northbay RdQuailwood DrWhitley Collins DrEAC 2 4 260 32 8,320 4/16/19 861106 1106 Packet RdPalos Verdes DrSeacove DrEAC 2 6 1,065 24 25,560 3/7/19 861164 1164 Parkhurst DrStarline DrEndEAC 2 7 653 26 16,978 3/13/19 861616 1616 Redondela DrWestern AveAlvesta PlEAC 2 3 591 33 19,503 3/15/19861616 1619 Redondela DrEldena Dr W/sEndEAC 2 3 347 28 9,716 3/15/19 861248 1248 Sandbrook DrVia Sonoma N/sEndEAC 2 1 485 31 16,135 4/9/19 861151 1151 Seaclaire DrSeaglen DrEndEAC 2 7 1,198 30 40,034 3/11/19 861256 1257 Springcreek RdMossbank DrFlambeau RdEAC 2 1 1,680 26 43,680 4/9/19 861551 1551 Summerland StEnrose Av W/sEast EndEAC 2 3 1,830 32 58,560 3/29/19 861624 1624 Tarraso DrAvd FelicianoRedondela DrEAC 2 3 545 26 14,170 3/15/19 861568 1570 Trudie DrJaybrook Dr E/sEndEAC 2 3 370 33 12,210 3/29/19 861024 1643 Via La CrestaVallon DrWest EndEAC 2 5 964 28 28,242 3/1/19 861241 1241 Wildbriar DrGrayslake RdBarkstone DrEAC 2 1 500 32 16,000 4/9/19 861558 1562 Bayend DrMacarthur St N/sTrudie Dr S/sEAC 2 3 325 26 8,450 3/29/19 871863 1065 Calle De SuenosCrest RdPrivate StEAC 02,160 36 77,760 4/15/19 871295 1760 Cedarbluff Dr28610 Cedarbluff DrTrailriders DrEAC 2 2 1,203 26 31,278 4/8/19 87Page 7 of 20B-56
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1156 1156 Cliffsite DrCoolheights DrEndEAC 2 7 678 28 18,984 3/11/19 871572 1572 Crestwood StEnrose AvBayend Dr E/sEAC 2 3 1,385 32 44,320 3/29/19 871258 1258 Flambeau RdSpringcreek RdGrayslake Rd N/sEAC 2 1 565 26 14,690 4/9/19 871258 1259 Flambeau RdGrayslake Rd S/SFinecrest DrEAC 2 1 1,600 26 41,600 4/9/19 871209 1209 Freeport RdHawthorne Bl FrontageWoodbrook RdEAC 2 1 1,075 32 34,400 4/8/19 871627 1627 Galerita DrMontereina Dr W/sEndEAC 2 3 590 27 15,930 4/11/19 871621 1621 Gaucho DrEldena DrEndEAC 2 3 350 32 11,200 3/15/19 871219 1219 Manitowac DrLittlebow RdBasswood AvEAC 2 1 1,420 32 45,440 3/28/19 871396 1396 Mistridge DrNorthbay RdNewstar DrEAC 2 4 891 32 28,512 4/15/19871585 1585 Mt Vancouver CtBloomwood RdEndEAC 2 3 490 29 14,210 4/11/19 871379 1379 Oaklon DrElkridge DrEndEAC 2 4 130 28 4,740 4/12/19 871078 1083 Oceanaire DrSeacrest Dr E/sEndEAC 2 4 635 20 12,700 3/8/19 871401 1401 Oceanridge DrScotwood DrNorthbay RdEAC 2 4 1,515 33 49,995 4/15/19 871345 1345 Posey WayKings Harbor DrEndEAC 2 2 195 29 5,655 3/12/19 871407 1407 Quailwood DrScotwood Dr215' E of Stonecrest Rd (City Limit EAC 2 7 1,403 33 46,299 4/16/19 871616 1791 Redondela DrAlvesta PlEldena DrEAC 2 9 1,630 33 53,790 3/15/19871269 1270 Rio Linda DrCenturia DrWest EndEAC 2 2 475 32 16,300 4/8/19 871395 1395 Scotwood DrWhitley Collins Dr NMistridge Dr W/sEAC 2 4 1,171 32 37,472 4/15/19 871505 1505 Seabryn DrDoverridge DrEndEAC 2 2 615 29 19,085 4/17/19 871107 1093 Seacove DrNantasket DrCoast Site DrEAAC 2 6 1,400 36 50,400 3/1/19 871638 1699 Sparta DrAtford DrEndEAC 2 3 1,580 26 41,080 4/15/19 871256 1256 Springcreek RdGroveoak PlMossbank DrEAC 2 1 643 26 16,718 4/9/19 871599 1599 Stokowski DrBeecham DrEndEAC 2 3 140 39 5,460 4/11/19 871565 1565 Trotwood AvMacarthur StTrudie DrEAC 2 3 230 26 5,980 3/29/19 871615 1615 Western Av (Frontage Rd) Redondela DrSouth EndEAC 2 3 525 3216,800 3/15/19 871208 1208 Woodbrook RdFreeportHawthorne BlEAC 2 1 910 32 29,120 4/9/19 871552 1552 Wycliff AvSummerland StGeneral StEAC 2 3 218 32 6,976 3/29/19871283 1754 Abbottswood DrBriarhurst DrGolden Meadow DrEAC 2 2 1,729 3255,328 3/12/19 881044 1043 Alta Vista DrHawthorne BoulevardAlta Vista DriveEAC 2 5 243 51 12,393 3/7/19 881114 1114 Arrowroot LnBarkentine RdEndEAC 2 6 906 24 21,744 3/7/19 881047 1049 Avenida EsplendidaAvenida ClassicaLos Verdes DriveEAC 2 51,100 37 40,700 4/15/19 881033 1033 Cachan DrCartier DrEndEAC 2 5 445 27 13,115 4/15/19 881108 1108 Clipper RdSeacove DrPalos Verdes DrEAC 2 6 535 36 19,260 3/7/19 881572 1574 Crestwood StUpland St E/SBayend Dr E/SEAC 2 3 700 32 22,400 3/29/19 881226 1226 Diversey DrBasswood AvBirchfield AvEAC 2 1 840 32 26,880 4/16/19 881303 1303 Eddinghill DrTrailrider Dr1652' E/O Trailrider DrEAC 2 2 1,652 31 51,212 4/8/19 881620 1620 Eldena DrRondondela Dr N/sEndEAC 2 3 776 31 24,056 3/15/19 881620 1684 Eldena DrRedondela Dr S/sAvd Aprenda N/sEAC 2 3 300 26 7,8003/15/19 881236 1236 Graylog StBasswood AvEndEAC 2 1 725 27 20,725 4/16/19 881240 1263 Grayslake RdMossbank DrHawthorne BlEAC 2 1 1,840 34 62,560 4/9/19 881143 1143 Gulfcrest DrHeroic DrEndEAC 2 7 550 32 17,600 3/11/19 881207 1207 Hawthorne Blvd (Frontage Rd) Woodbrook Rd W/SEnd @ Grayslake Rd WEAC 2 1 825 24 20,050 4/9/19 881305 1308 Hazelridge DrMonero DrPlainfield DrEAC 2 2 1,390 31 43,090 4/8/19 881556 1571 Highmore AvTrudie DrEndEAC 2 3 340 26 8,840 3/29/19 881152 1779 Hightide Dr1000' n/o Floweridge Dr Falconhead DrEAC 2 6 1,075 32 34,400 3/11/19 881566 1566 Jaybrook DrTrudie DrHomeworth DrEAC 2 3 1,175 26 30,550 3/29/19 881266 1266 Monero DrAlvarez DrSouth EndEAC 2 2 315 29 10,285 4/8/19 88Page 8 of 20B-57
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1266 1267 Monero DrAlvarez DrGranvia AltamiraEAC 2 2 1,290 32 41,280 4/8/19 881250 1225 Mossbank DrBasswood AvEndEAC 2 1 185 31 5,735 3/28/19 881250 1251 Mossbank DrGrayslake Rd W/SEast EndEAC 2 1 415 34 14,110 4/9/19 881591 1591 Mt Langley CtCaddington DrEndEAC 2 3 195 40 7,800 4/15/19 881181 1110 Palos Verdes Dr (Frontage Rd) Barkentine Rd E/sEndEAC 2 6 165 22 3,630 3/7/19 881031 1031 Sattes DrCachen PlLe Blanc PlEAC 2 5 1,262 32 40,384 3/8/19 881031 1796 Sattes DrLe Blanc PlEndEAC 2 5 766 32 24,512 3/8/19 881820 1824 Seaglen DrFlowerridge DrEndEAC 2 6 1,773 35 63,205 3/11/19 881509 1509 Shire Oaks Dr1065' S/O Seamount Dr Covecrest Dr W/SEAC 2 2 1,187 33 39,171 4/17/19 881162 1163 Starline DrNewridge Dr N/sEndEAC 2 7 1,175 22 25,850 3/13/19 881406 1409 Stonecrest RdScotmist Dr S/sSunmist DrEAC 2 4 775 32 24,800 4/16/19 881347 1667 Verde Ridge RdLocklenna LnWest EndEAC 2 2 1,500 32 49,150 3/12/19 881705 1705 Via Malona50'w/via Porto GrandEndEAC 2 2 1,003 30 31,240 4/17/19 881005 1009 Via RiveraRue GodboutNorth EndEAC 2 5 415 32 13,280 4/10/19 881271 1271 Villa Rosa DrRio Linda DrEast EndEAC 2 2 590 28 17,620 4/8/19881394 1411 Whitecliff DrStonecrest RdEndEAC 2 4 490 33 17,420 4/16/19 881222 1222 Whitefox DrManitowac DrEndEAC 2 1 1,602 27 43,254 3/28/19 881283 1284 Abbottswood DrTrailrider DriveBriarhurst DrEAC 2 2 633 32 20,256 3/12/19 891317 1317 Acana DrLa Garita DriveElla RoadEAC 2 2 750 26 19,500 4/8/19 891044 1045 Alta Vista Dr6863 Alta Vista DriveAlta Vista DrEAC 2 5 1,260 42 52,920 3/7/19 891046 1046 Avenida ClassicaLos Verdes DriveCrest RoadEAC 2 5 1,522 37 56,314 4/15/19 891059 1060 Avenida De CalmaCamino PorvenirCalle De SuenosEAC 2 5 1,160 31 35,960 4/15/19 891062 1062 Calle Del PajaritoAvenida De CalmaEndEAC 2 5 300 40 13,150 4/15/19 891063 1063 Camino PorvenirAvenida De Calma30444 Camino PorvenirEAC2 5 1,249 27 33,723 4/15/19 891295 1295 Cedarbluff DrRothrock Dr28610 Cedarbluff DrEAC 2 2 1,021 2626,546 4/8/19 891035 1035 Cheret PlChartres DrEndEAC 2 5 460 27 13,570 3/8/19 891510 1510 Circlet DrShire Oaks DrEndEAC 2 2 210 35 8,600 4/17/19 891155 1155 Coolheights DrFloweridge DrCliffsite DrEAC 2 7 994 33 32,8023/11/19 891155 1761 Coolheights DrCliffsite DrEndEAC 2 6 1,693 33 55,869 3/11/19 891572 1573 Crestwood StWestern AvUpland St E/sEAC 2 3 615 32 19,680 3/29/19 891133 1133 Forrestal DrPalos Verdes Dr N/SEnd At GateEAC 2 7 1,898 36 68,328 3/11/19 891285 1322 Golden Meadow DrBeechfield DrMaycroft DrEAC 2 2 565 26 14,690 3/12/19 891142 1142 Heroic DrSearaven Dr N/sGulfcrest DrEAC 2 7 900 32 28,800 3/11/19 891152 1152 Hightide DrFloweridge Dr1000' n/o Floweridge DrEAC 2 7 1,000 32 32,000 3/11/19 891563 1564 Homeworth DrTrudie Dr N/sJaybroook DrEAC 2 3 825 26 21,450 3/29/19 891036 1036 Le Blanc PlSattes DrEndEAC 2 5 610 26 16,960 3/8/19 891412 1784 Los Verdes DrAvenida EsplendidaGolf Parking LotEAC 2 5 1,921 37 45,103 4/15/19 891659 1659 Mesaba RdHawthorne Blvd Frontage EndEAC 2 1 375 26 10,900 4/9/19 891396 1787 Mistridge DrNewstar DrScottwood DrEAC 2 3 1,223 32 39,136 4/15/19 891597 1613 Montereina DrAvd EstudianteAvd AprendaEAC 2 3 1,265 34 43,010 4/11/19 891518 1518 Moongate DrQuailhill DrLunada Ridge DrEAC 2 2 270 33 8,910 4/17/19 891593 1593 Mt Whitney WyToscanini DrEndEAC 2 3 480 34 16,320 4/11/19 891092 1092 Nantasket DrBeachview DrSeacove DrEAC 2 6 665 36 23,940 3/1/19891078 1078 Oceanaire DrAmber Sky Dr W/s50'W/Amber SkyEAC 2 4 500 25 12,500 3/8/19 891014 1014 Rue ValoisRue Langlois1000' s/o Rue LangloisEAC 2 5 1,000 27 27,000 4/10/19 891395 1404 Scotwood DrWhitley Collins Dr SCity LimitsEAC 2 4 1,046 37 40,589 4/16/19 891144 1797 Sea Raven Dr1000' s/o Pirate DrHeroic DrEAC 2 6 1,005 32 32,160 3/11/19 89Page 9 of 20B-58
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1107 1107 Seacove DrBerkentinePalos Verdes DrEAC 2 6 1,172 36 32,400 3/7/19 891677 1677 Seamount DrHawthorne BlCovecrest DrEAC 2 2 1,679 33 55,407 4/17/19 891607 1607 Velez DrSanta Rena DrMontereina Dr W/sEAC 2 3 795 26 20,670 4/11/19 891102 1102 Via BaronVia Palacio DrEndEAC 2 6 460 26 13,110 3/1/19 891678 1678 Via Costa Verde50'e/via Porto GrandEndEAC 2 2 1,245 30 38,470 4/17/19 891873 1845 Vista Del MarPalos Verdes DrEndEAC 2570 34 22,245 4/17/19 891365 1670 Warrior DrSilver Arrow Rd S/sBrowndeer LnEAC 2 4 1,003 32 32,096 4/12/19 891272 1272 Whitestone RdFlambeau RdMossbank DrEAC 2 1 1,645 26 42,770 4/9/19 891265 1265 Alvarez DrHawthorne Blvd Frontage Monero DriveEAC 2 2 465 2612,090 4/8/19 901639 1639 Atford DrSparta DrEndEAC 2 3 285 35 9,975 4/15/19 901558 1567 Bayend DrJaybrook DrEndEAC 2 3 140 35 4,900 3/29/19 901403 1403 Beachside DrOceanridge DriveEndEAC 2 4 465 39 19,385 4/15/19 901321 1321 Beechfield DrIndian Rock DrGolden Meadow DrEAC 2 2 921 26 23,946 3/12/19 901158 1158 Bendigo DrGanado DrEndEAAC 2 7 706 30 21,180 3/13/19 901309 1309 Birchman DrHazelridge DrBraidwood DrEAC 2 2 280 32 8,960 3/12/19 901581 1581 Bloomwood RdMt Shasta DrCapitol RdEAC 2 3 1,385 32 44,320 4/11/19 901063 1759 Camino Porvenir30444 Camino Porvenir Calle Del SuenosEAC2 5 1,142 27 30,834 4/15/19 901603 1604 Delasonde DrMontereina DrWestern AvEAC 2 3 1,080 32 34,560 4/11/19 901642 1642 Dorado DrEnrose Av E/sGunter RdEAC 2 3 1,485 26 38,610 4/15/19901318 1318 Ella RdAcana RdCerta DrEAC 2 2 1,100 29 31,900 4/8/19 901150 1150 Floweridge DrGanado Dr W/sSeaglen DrEAC 2 7 553 32 21,760 3/11/19 901285 1285 Golden Meadow DrAbbotswood DrEndEAC 2 2 330 40 14,350 3/12/19901161 1161 Greve DrWest EndEast EndEAAC 2 7 590 34 20,060 3/13/19 901152 1780 Hightide DrFalconhead DrEndEAC 2 6 462 32 14,784 3/11/19 901273 1273 Hyte RdGroveoak Pl W/sSouth EndEAC 2 1 425 30 13,850 4/9/19 901228 1229 Ironwood StBirchfield Av N/SBasswood AvEAC 2 1 865 32 27,6804/16/19 901566 1781 Jaybrook DrHomeworth DrHighmore AvEAC 2 9 1,261 26 32,786 3/29/19 901312 1312 Lobrook DrBraidwood Dr NBraidwood Dr SEAC 2 2 1,428 30 42,840 3/12/19 901337 1715 Locklenna LnWindport DrHawthorne BlvdEAC 2 2 1,325 32 42,4003/12/19 901166 1167 Luciana DrDianora Dr S/sEndEAC 2 7 350 24 8,400 3/13/19 901165 1654 Newridge Dr3459 Newridge DrEndEAC 2 7 656 32 20,992 3/13/19 901181 1105 Palos Verdes Dr (Frontage Rd) Barkentine RdSt Peter's ChurchEAC 2 6 525 22 11,550 3/7/19 901399 1399 Pinecastle DrMistridge Dr N/sEndEAC 2 4 235 36 9,710 4/15/19 901360 1360 Rockhurst RdRockvalley RdEndEAC 2 1 230 28 7,590 4/12/19 901878 1596 Rockinghorse RdToscanini DrEndEAC 2657 25 19,180 4/11/19 901115 1115 Schooner DrPalos Verdes Dr N/sExultant DrEAC 2 6 575 32 18,400 3/7/19 901085 1085 Seacrest DrOceanaire DrCrenshaw BlEAC 2 4 185 26 4,810 3/8/19901096 1098 Seahill DrBeachview DrPalos Verdes DrEAC 2 6 590 56 33,040 3/1/19 901668 1729 Silver Arrow RdWarrior DrBlackhorse DrEAC 2 3 1,463 31 45,353 4/12/19 901227 1227 Silverspur Rd (Frontage Rd) Ironwood StEndEAC 2 1 1,236 27 33,372 4/16/19 901587 1587 Toscanini DrWestern AvMt WhitneyEAC 2 3 1,013 37 37,481 4/11/19 901297 1694 Trailrider DrEddinghill DrRothrock DrEAC 2 2 1,803 32 57,6963/28/19 901568 1804 Trudie DrBayend DrHighmore AveEAC 2 9 1,173 32 37,536 3/29/19901134 1134 Trump National DrPalos Verdes Dr SEndEAC 2 7 1,399 32 56,7303/11/19 901600 1600 Van Karajan DrMontereina DrEndEAC 2 3 990 32 31,680 4/11/19 901005 1013 Via RiveraRue De La PierreRue ValoisEAC 2 5 1,425 32 45,600 4/10/19 901394 1394 Whitecliff DrSunmist Dr S/sWhitley Collins Dr NEAC 2 4 82533 27,225 4/15/19 90Page 10 of 20B-59
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1122 1130 Admirable DrSchooner Drive E/sConqueror Drive W/sEAC 2 6 1,540 32 49,280 3/7/19 911319 1319 Amber Gate DrMonero DrTrailrider DrEAC 2 2 1,635 32 52,320 3/12/19 911139 1139 Aqua Vista DrPalos Verdes Dr N/sEndEAC 2 7 626 27 16,902 3/11/19 911516 1516 Armaga Spring RdIndian Valley RoadHighridge RdEAC 2 2 1,854 32 59,328 4/17/19 911178 1178 Azores PlTarapaca RdEndEAC 2 7 225 28 7,450 3/14/19 911111 1112 Barkentine RdTarragon Rd N/sEndEAC 2 6 635 26 16,510 3/7/19 911233 1224 Basswood AvMonte Magala DrMazzur DrEAC 2 1 1,045 32 33,440 4/16/19 911598 1598 Beecham DrMontereina DrEndEAC 2 3 540 32 17,280 4/11/19 911368 1757 Browndeer LnElmbridge DrLone Valley DrEAC 2 3 1,399 33 46,167 4/12/19 911335 1335 El Rodeo RdWhites Point DrKings Harbor DrEAC 2 2 1,135 32 36,320 3/12/19 911575 1575 Enrose AvFairhill DrSummerland StEAC 2 3 890 32 28,480 3/29/19911126 1128 Exultant DrSchooner Dr W/sDauntless Dr S/SEAC 2 6 1,370 27 36,990 3/7/19 911154 1154 Falconhead DrHightide DrEndEAC 2 7 450 28 12,600 3/11/19 911512 1513 Firthridge RdCovecrest Dr N/SIndian Valley RdEAC 2 2 594 2615,444 4/17/19 911632 1632 Gunter RdCaddington Dr S/sEndEAC 2 3 715 27 19,305 4/15/19 911305 1305 Hazelridge DrPlainfield DrLomo DrEAC 2 2 1,625 31 50,375 4/8/19 911117 1117 Helm PlDauntless DrEndEAAC 2 6 130 32 4,160 3/7/19 911526 1526 King Arthur CtArmaga Spring Rd W/SNorth EndEAC 2 2 480 28 14,640 4/17/19 911337 1337 Locklenna LnVerde Ridge RdWindport DrEAC 2 2 976 32 31,232 3/12/19 911370 1370 Lone Valley DrBrowndeer LnEndEAC 2 4 415 26 12,040 4/12/19 911412 1412 Los Verdes DrHawthorne BlvdAvenida EsplendidaEAC 2 5 910 3733,670 4/10/19 911554 1554 Mac Arthur StEnrose AvBayend Dr W/sEAC 2 3 1,475 32 47,200 3/29/19 911332 1332 Madeline Cove DrTrailrider DrWarnick RdEAC 2 2 890 32 28,4803/12/19 911634 1634 Mendon DrGunter RdEndEAC 2 3 1,025 26 26,650 4/15/19 911397 1397 Newstar DrMistridge Dr N/sEndEAC 2 4 165 37 7,355 4/15/19 911871 1842 Ocean Crest DrHawthorne BlvdIsland View DrEAC 2205 36 7,670 4/16/19 911138 1138 Palo Vista DrSeacliff Dr N/sEndEAC 2 7 1,350 27 36,450 3/11/19911141 1141 Phantom DrPirate DrHeroic DrEAC 2 7 1,620 32 51,840 3/11/19 911276 1276 Ravenspur DrHawthorne BlHawthorne BlEAC 2 4 1,260 41 51,660 4/16/19 911100 1100 Sealpoint CtSeahill DrEndEAC 2 6 155 36 6,730 3/1/19 911091 1091 Seawolf DrPalos Verdes DrBeachview DrEAC 2 6 560 56 31,360 3/1/19 911668 1668 Silver Arrow RdSilverspur RdWarrior DrEAC 2 4 1,718 31 53,258 4/12/19 911127 1127 Stalwart DrExultant DtSchooner DrEAC 2 6 1,234 27 33,318 3/7/19 911127 1129 Stalwart DrDauntless DrSchooner Dr W/sEAC 2 6 876 27 23,652 3/7/19 911177 1177 Tarapaca RdCalle AdventuraEndEAC 2 7 905 25 22,825 3/14/19 911587 1802 Toscanini DrMt WhitneyMt Shasta DrEAC 2 9 1,110 37 41,070 4/11/19 911568 1569 Trudie DrTrotwood AveBayend DrEAC 2 3 1,001 32 32,032 3/29/19911560 1576 Upland StCrestwood St N/sBayend E/sEAC 2 3 765 34 26,010 3/29/19 911347 1347 Verde Ridge RdHawthorne BlLocklenna LnEAC 2 2 1,835 32 58,720 3/12/19 911102 1103 Via BaronVia Palacio DrEndEAC 2 6 400 26 11,550 3/1/19 911695 1695 Via La RoccaVia Costa VerdeEndEAC 2 2 280 31 9,880 4/17/19 911702 1702 Via PergolaVia Costa VerdeEndEAC 2 2 270 34 10,280 4/17/19 911183 1184 Via SubidaPalos Verdes Dr800' W of Palos VerdesEAC 2 3 80016 12,800 3/14/19 911011 1011 Via VictoriaVia LoradoNorth EndEAC 2 5 648 30 19,440 4/10/19 911145 1145 Vigilance DrPhantom Dr1000' e/o Phantom DrEAC 2 7 1,000 28 28,000 3/11/19 911261 1261 Waukesha PlGrayslake RdEndEAC 2 1 170 41 8,070 4/16/19 911334 1334 Whites Point DrVerde Ridge RdEl Rodeo RdEAC 2 2 635 33 20,955 3/12/19 91Page 11 of 20B-60
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1071 1391 Whitley Collins Dr350' E/Stonecrest (City Limits) Northbay Rd N/sEAC 2 4 410 32 13,120 4/16/19 911558 1559 Bayend DrCrestwood St N/sGeneral StEAC 2 3 485 32 15,520 3/29/19 921311 1311 Braidwood DrBirchman DrLobrook Dr NEAC 2 2 760 30 22,800 3/12/19 921311 1313 Braidwood DrLobrook Dr SBirchnan DrEAC 2 2 400 30 12,000 3/12/19 921629 1630 Caddington DrGunter RdEnrose AveEAC 2 3 1,598 32 51,136 4/15/19 921061 1061 Calle De ResolanaAvd De CalamaEndEAC 2 5 225 41 10,375 4/15/19921865 1836 Calle EntraderoCalle VientoPalos Verdes DrEAC 24,155 22 106,885 4/15/19 921029 1030 Cartier DrMarne Dr E/sDupre DrEAC 2 5 380 32 12,160 3/1/19 921316 1316 Certa DrElla RdLomo DrEAC 2 2 420 25 10,500 4/8/19 921299 1301 Cherty DrGolden Meadow DrEndEAC 2 2 400 26 11,500 3/12/19 921500 1500 Doverridge DrHawthorne BlStadia Hill LnEAC 2 2 190 32 6,080 4/17/19 921346 1346 Elkmont DrSilverspur RdWhitehorn DrEAC 2 1 1,140 37 42,180 4/16/19 921318 1662 Ella RdCerta RdSouth EndEAC 2 2 425 29 13,425 4/8/19 921575 1681 Enrose AvFairhill DrMacarthur StEAC 2 3 600 32 19,200 3/29/19921512 1512 Firthridge RdCovecrest Dr N/SNorth EndEAC 2 2 650 26 18,150 4/17/19 921147 1159 Ganado DrBendigo Dr N/s1993' N/O Bendigo DrEAC 2 7 1,993 3161,783 3/13/19 921147 1727 Ganado Dr1993' N/O Bendigo DrCrest RdEAC 2 6 1,993 31 61,7833/13/19 921292 1293 Geronimo DrClovercliff DrHedgewood DrEAC 2 2 1,125 32 36,0003/28/19 921285 1664 Golden Meadow DrClovercliff DrAbbotswood DrEAC 2 2 1,350 3243,200 3/12/19 921632 1633 Gunter RdCaddington Rd N/sMendon DrEAC 2 3 700 26 18,200 4/15/19 921556 1682 Highmore AvTrudie Dr N/sJaybrood Dr S/sEAC 2 3 230 26 5,980 3/29/19 921514 1515 Indian Valley RdHawthorne BlFirthridge Rd N/SEAC 2 2 1,01032 32,320 4/17/19 921669 1669 Island View DrOcean Crest DrEndEAC 2 2 535 36 20,410 4/16/19 921507 1507 Leacrest DrSeamount DrEndEAC 2 2 700 31 22,950 4/17/19 921280 1281 Lomo DrSan Nicolas DrEddinghill DrEAC 2 2 1,197 32 38,304 4/8/19 921266 1279 Monero DrGranvia AltamiraAmber Gate DrEAC 2 2 1,865 31 57,815 4/8/19 921518 1523 Moongate DrCovecrest DrEndEAC 2 2 300 31 10,550 4/17/19 921400 1400 Northbay RdMistridge Dr N/SWhitley Collins Dr NEAC 2 4 83532 26,720 4/15/19 921078 1082 Oceanaire DrAmber Sky Dr W/sSeacrest Dr E/sEAC 2 4 350 25 8,750 3/8/19 921181 1846 Palos Verdes Dr (Frontage Rd) Ganado DrEndEAC 2380 36 14,540 4/17/19 921872 1843 Peacock Ridge RdHighridge RdEndEAC 2830 35 31,485 4/16/19 921304 1304 Plainfield DrHazelridge Dr1000' s/o Hazelridge DrEAC 2 2 1,000 25 25,000 4/8/19 921038 1038 Rhone DrCartier Dr S/sEndEAC 2 5 1,300 26 34,950 3/8/19 921307 1793 San Nicolas Dr1000' s/o Monero DrLomo DrEAC 2 2 1,362 26 35,412 4/8/19 921307 1794 San Nicolas DrLomo DrHawthorne BlvdEAC 2 2 188 26 4,888 4/8/19921175 1175 San Ramon DrPalos Verdes DrEndEAC 2 7 1,095 26 28,470 3/14/19921605 1605 Santa Rena DrPontevedra DrMontereina Dr E/sEAC 2 3 635 26 16,510 4/11/19 921520 1520 Scotmist RdLunada Ridge DrCovecrest DrEAC 2 2 1,245 27 33,615 4/17/19 921840 1827 Sea Breeze AvSea Terrace AvEndEAC 2 3 725 37 26,825 3/7/19 921503 1503 Stadia Hill LnDoverridge DrEndEAC 2 2 700 31 22,950 4/17/19 921406 1406 Stonecrest RdScotwood DrCity LimitsEAC 2 4 919 32 29,408 4/16/19 921393 1393 Sunmist DrWhitley Collins Dr EWhitecliff Dr S/sEAC 2 4 1,166 33 38,478 4/15/19 921587 1594 Toscanini DrWestern AvMontereina Dr E/sEAC 2 3 750 33 24,7504/11/19 921587 1595 Toscanini DrMontereina Dr E/sEndEAC 2 3 765 26 19,890 4/11/19921297 1803 Trailrider DrRothrock DrCedarbluff DrEAC 2 2 295 32 9,440 3/28/19 921568 1568 Trudie DrWestern AvHighmore Av E/sEAC 2 3 300 32 9,600 3/29/19921116 1116 Valor PlDauntless DrEndEAAC 2 6 250 24 6,000 3/7/19 92Page 12 of 20B-61
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1022 1022 Via Del MarVia RiveraEndEAC 2 5 585 28 17,530 4/10/19 921145 1812 Vigilance Dr1000' e/o Phantom DrEndEAC 2 6 1,124 28 31,472 3/11/19 921666 1666 Whitehorn DrElkmont DrElkmont DrEAC 2 1 860 27 23,220 4/16/19921071 1392 Whitley Collins DrWhitecliff Dr S/sCrest Rd N/sEAC 2 4 53032 16,960 4/16/19 921249 1249 Woodfern DrVia Sonoma N/sEndEAC 2 1 890 26 24,240 4/9/19 921706 1706 Alida PlPalos Verdes DrEndEAC 2 5 190 33 6,820 4/10/19 931047 1048 Avenida EsplendidaCrest RoadAvenida ClassicaEAC 2 5 775 37 28,675 4/15/19 931233 1749 Basswood AvShorewood RdSilver Spur RdEAC 2 1 973 32 31,136 3/28/19 931294 1294 Blythewood DrHartcrest DrTrailrider DrEAC 2 2 2,140 37 79,180 3/28/19 931368 1369 Browndeer LnLone Valley DrElkridge Dr N/sEAC 2 4 1,130 32 36,160 4/12/19 931869 1840 Calle VientoCalle EntraderoEndEAC 2960 30 33,255 4/15/19 931648 1648 Camino PequenoCalle De SuenosEndEAC 2 5 145 54 8,980 4/15/19 931029 1690 Cartier DrRhone E/sChartres DrEAC 2 5 350 32 11,200 3/8/19 931535 1832 Cayuse Ln480' N/Chaparral LnEndEAC 2 3 563 19 10,697 3/15/19 931268 1268 Centuria DrMonero DrRio Linda DrEAC 2 2 245 32 7,840 4/8/19 931032 1032 Chartres DrSattes DrCartier DrEAC 2 5 1,665 32 53,280 4/15/19931290 1290 Clovercliff DrGolden Meadow DrGeronimo DrEAC 2 2 1,232 32 39,424 3/28/19 931170 1170 Corinna DrDianora Dr W/sCasilina DrEAC 2 7 1,840 26 47,840 3/13/19 931687 1649 Crest RdAvenida TranquilaAvenida EleganteEAC 2 5 912 35 31,920 4/15/19 931687 1844 Crest RdSPUR S/Avenida De Calma EndEAC 2116 33 5,595 4/15/19931171 1174 Deluna DrCrest Rd N/sEndEAC 2 7 1,360 28 38,080 3/14/19 931168 1169 Dianora DrDeluna Dr S/sCorinna Dr S/sEAC 2 7 410 26 10,660 3/13/19 931353 1353 Falcon Rock PlDiamond Head LnEndEAC 2 1 320 28 10,210 4/12/19931292 1292 Geronimo DrAbbotswood DrClovercliff DrEAC 2 2 1,200 32 38,400 3/28/19 931285 1326 Golden Meadow DrMaycrotf DrHedgewood DrEAC 2 2 1,660 32 53,120 3/12/19 931277 1277 Granvia AltamiraHawthorne BlCity LimitsEAC 4 2 1,035 63 65,205 4/8/19 931367 1367 Hales Corner RdFawnskin DrLonghill DrEAC 2 4 814 26 21,164 4/12/19 931212 1212 Indian Peak RdBasswood AveEau Claire DrEAC 2 1 1,100 27 29,700 3/28/19 931514 1514 Indian Valley RdFirthridge Rd N/SCovecrest DrEAC 2 2 1,70032 54,400 4/17/19 931315 1315 La Garita DrLomo DrElla RdEAC 2 2 508 36 18,288 4/8/19 931300 1300 Larkvale DrTrailrider DrGolden Meadow DrEAC 2 2 850 32 27,200 3/12/19 931508 1508 Leah CirSeamount DrEndEAC 2 2 300 35 11,750 4/17/19 931034 1034 Matisse DrSattes DrChartres DrEAC 2 5 1,830 26 47,580 3/8/19 931398 1398 Moro Bay DrMistridge Dr N/SEndEAC 2 4 260 35 10,350 4/15/19 931173 1173 Narino DrCasilina DrEndEAC 2 7 290 24 6,960 3/13/19 931181 1182 Palos Verdes Dr (Frontage Rd) Calle Adventura E/sWest EndEAC 2 7 415 25 11,475 3/14/19 931140 1140 Pirate DrForrestal Dr E/sPhantom DrEAC 2 7 540 32 17,280 3/11/19 931304 1788 Plainfield Dr1000' s/o Hazelridge Dr Lomo DrEAC 2 2 1,175 2529,375 4/8/19 931357 1358 Rockvalley RdDeepbrook Dr W/sHawkhurst Dr E/sEAC 2 1 690 3322,770 4/12/19 931008 1008 Rue De La PierreVia RiveraSouth EndEAC 2 5 1,370 32 44,990 4/10/19 931010 1010 Rue GodboutVia RiveraVia VictoriaEAC 2 5 375 32 12,000 4/10/19931314 1314 Santona DrLomo DrEndEAC 2 2 640 26 17,790 4/8/19 931136 1137 Seacliff DrPalo Vista Dr S/sEndEAC 2 7 465 27 12,555 3/11/19 931402 1402 Seaside Heights DrScotwood DrOceanridge DrEAC 2 4 1,150 32 36,800 4/15/19 931297 1661 Trailrider DrEddinghill DrAmber Gate DrEAC 2 2 250 32 8,000 4/8/19 931016 1016 Via CambronBerry Hill DrEndEAC 2 5 815 27 22,555 4/10/19 931018 1018 Via LoradoPalos Verdes DrVia Maria Celeste NEAC 2 5 780 32 24,960 4/10/19 93Page 13 of 20B-62
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1018 1019 Via LoradoVia Maria Celeste NVia VictoriaEAC 2 5 625 32 20,000 4/10/19 931005 1810 Via Rivera1000' n/o Via BoricaRue GodboutEAC 2 5 1,028 32 32,896 4/10/19 931333 1333 Warnick RdMadeline Cove DrVerde Ridge RdEAC 2 2 876 33 28,908 3/12/19 931216 1216 Waupaca RdPembina RdFond Du Lac RdEAC 2 1 365 26 9,490 3/28/19931283 1283 Abbottswood DrLomo DrTrailrider DrEAC 2 2 1,120 32 35,840 4/8/19 941051 1051 Avenida CelestialAvenida ClassicaNorth EndEAC 2 5 265 33 9,895 4/15/19 941051 1052 Avenida CelestialAvenida ClassicaSouth EndEAC 2 5 640 30 20,350 4/15/19 941111 1111 Barkentine RdPalos Verdes DrTarragon Rd N/sEAC 2 6 200 32 6,400 3/7/19 941095 1095 Beachview DrCoast Site DrNantasket DriveEAC 2 6 1,411 36 50,796 3/1/19 941015 1015 Berry Hill DrVia VictoriaPalos Verdes DrEAC 2 5 1,615 32 51,680 4/10/19 941350 1350 Blackhorse DrSilver Arrow Rd E/sEndEAC 2 1 1,286 32 42,402 4/12/19 941350 1362 Blackhorse DrHawthorne Bl E/sSilver Arrow Rd E/sEAC 2 1 710 32 22,720 4/12/19 941629 1758 Caddington DrWestern AveGunter RdEAC 2 9 751 37 27,787 4/15/19941029 1700 Cartier DrChartes DrCachan PlEAC 2 5 1,385 32 44,320 3/8/19 941537 1537 Clevis RdPalos VerdesEndEAC 2 3 585 30 17,550 4/9/19 941511 1522 Covecrest DrScotmist Dr S/sShire Oaks Dr S/sEAC 2 2 1,060 32 33,920 4/17/19 941511 1679 Covecrest DrScotmist Dr S/sSeamount DrEAC 2 2 794 32 25,408 4/17/19 941123 1123 Dauntless DrAdmirable DrSchooner DrEAAC 2 6 1,554 32 49,728 3/7/19 941351 1351 Diamond Head LnBlackhorse DrEndEAC 2 1 1,700 32 55,650 4/12/19941157 1157 Eaglehaven CirFloweridge DrEndEAC 2 7 135 40 5,400 3/11/19 941303 1728 Eddinghill Dr1652' E/O Trailrider DrHawthorne BlvdEAC 2 21,652 31 51,212 4/8/19 941335 1336 El Rodeo RdKings Harbor DrVerde Ridge RdEAC 2 2 250 32 8,0003/12/19 941378 1378 Elmbridge DrBrowndeer LnElkridge DrEAC 2 4 1,095 32 35,040 4/12/19 941126 1126 Exultant DrSchooner DrConqueror Dr E/sEAC 2 6 1,399 27 37,773 3/7/19 941366 1366 Fawnskin DrLonghill Dr S/SSilver Arrow Rd S/SEAC 2 4 1,36026 35,360 4/12/19 941375 1375 Flaming Arrow DrLonghill DrBrowndeer LnEAC 2 4 808 37 29,8964/12/19 941147 1148 Ganado Dr300'W of Palos VerdesFloweridge Dr S/sEAAC 2 7 760 34 25,840 3/11/19 941147 1149 Ganado DrFloweridge Dr N/sBendigo Dr N/sEAAC 2 7 1,414 31 43,834 3/13/19 941286 1286 Grovespring DrGolden Meadow DrSprucegrove DrEAC 2 2 1,120 26 29,120 3/28/19 941653 1653 Hawksmoor DrGanado DrEndEAC 2 7 565 30 16,950 3/13/19 941497 1067 Highridge RdCrest Rd S/SOcean TerEAC 2 4 600 58 33,950 3/7/19941354 1354 Honey Creek RdBlackhorse DrEndEAC 2 1 1,025 26 27,900 4/12/19941862 1835 Laurel DrMarguerite DrEndEAC 2655 28 20,425 4/15/19 941372 1380 Longhill DrElkridge Dr E/SBeechgate DrEAC 2 4 800 32 25,600 4/12/19 941288 1288 Maplepark DrSprucegrove DrEndEAC 2 2 705 28 20,890 3/28/19 941525 1525 Meadowmist DrScotmist DrArmaga Spring RdEAC 2 2 1,265 31 39,215 4/17/19 941363 1363 Nokomis RdDeepbrook DrEndEAC 2 1 740 28 21,870 4/12/19 941504 1504 Parklynn DrDoverredge DrEndEAC 2 2 695 33 24,185 4/17/19 941867 1838 Paseo De La LuzCalle EntraderoCalle CortadaEAC 21,738 30 52,790 4/15/19 941215 1215 Pembina RdWaupaca RdEau Claire DrEAC 2 1 590 27 15,930 3/28/19941517 1517 Quailhill DrArmaga Spring RdEndEAC 2 2 900 32 29,950 4/17/19 941357 1357 Rockvalley RdDeepbrook Dr W/sEndEAC 2 1 585 29 18,215 4/12/19941014 1792 Rue Valois1000' Rue LangloisVia RiveraEAC 2 5 1,283 27 34,641 4/10/19 941307 1307 San Nicolas DrMonero Dr1000' s/o Monero DrEAC 2 2 1,000 26 26,000 4/8/19 941180 1180 Santa Luna DrVista Mesa DrEndEAC 2 7 550 22 13,250 3/14/19 941115 1652 Schooner DrExultant DtDauntless DR S/sEAC 2 6 555 32 17,760 3/7/19 941306 1306 Scotgrove DrLomo DrEndEAC 2 2 260 37 10,720 4/8/19 94Page 14 of 20B-63
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1840 1828 Sea Breeze AvSea Terrace AvEndEAC 2 3 1,319 37 48,803 3/7/19 941144 1144 Sea Raven DrPirate Dr1000' s/o Pirate DrEAC 2 7 1,000 32 32,000 3/11/19 941830 1825 Sea Terrace AveCrest RdSeabreeze AvEAC 2 3 235 45 10,575 3/7/19 941850 1829 Sea View AvEndEndEAC 2 3 1,570 37 60,290 3/7/19 941348 1348 Shadow Wood DrElkmont DrEndEAC 2 1 1,150 26 30,450 4/16/19 941352 1352 Silvermoon LnDiamond Head LnEndEAC 2 1 630 25 17,000 4/12/19 941374 1374 Sunny Point PlLonghill DrEndEAC 2 4 400 28 12,450 4/12/19 941023 1026 Vallon DrHawthorne BlMarne DrEAC 2 5 400 32 12,800 3/1/19 941007 1807 Via Borica1000' n/o Via RiveraEndEAC 2 5 1,228 32 39,296 4/10/19 941866 1837 Via Del CieloPaseo De La LuzVia VicenteEAC 23,745 30 113,130 4/15/19 941188 1188 Via La PalomaVia ColinitaEndEAC 2 3 650 20 13,000 3/14/19 941020 1020 Via Maria CelesteVia LoradoEndEAC 2 5 235 36 8,710 4/10/19 941101 1101 Via PalacioSeacove DrEndEAC 2 6 325 32 10,400 3/1/19 941005 1005 Via RiveraRue La FluerRue De La PierreEAC 2 5 890 32 28,480 4/10/19 941005 1006 Via RiveraRue La FluerVia BoricaEAC 2 5 670 32 21,440 4/10/19941005 1021 Via RiveraRue ValoisHawthorne BlEAC 2 5 665 33 21,945 4/10/19941011 1012 Via VictoriaVia RiveraBerry Hill DrEAC 2 5 769 32 24,608 4/10/19 941179 1179 Vista Mesa DrCalle Adventura E/sSanta Luna DrEAC 2 7 1,30026 33,800 3/14/19 941160 1160 Abrazo DriveGanado DriveGreve DriveEAC 2 7 292 32 9,344 3/13/19 951122 2000 Admirable DrDAUNTLESS DRSCHOONER DREAC 2 6 1,778 32 56,896 3/7/19 951381 1381 Beechgate DrCity LimitsLonghill DriveEAC 2 4 1,210 32 38,7204/12/19 951629 1629 Caddington DrEnrose Av W/sEndEAC 2 3 281 37 10,397 4/15/19 951868 1839 Calle CortadaPaseo De La LuzCalle CortadaEAC 2340 29 10,810 4/15/19 951029 1029 Cartier DrMarne Dr E/sEndEAC 2 5 845 26 23,120 3/1/19 951118 1118 Conqueror DrDauntless DrPalos Verdes DrEAAC 2 6 985 32 31,520 3/7/19 951687 1066 Crest RdAvenida EleganteCalle De SuenosEAC 2 5 1,758 37 65,046 4/15/19 951123 1741 Dauntless DrSchooner DrConqueror DrEAC 2 6 1,278 32 40,896 3/7/19 951382 1382 Delacroix RdLonghill DrLonghill DrEAC 2 4 1,515 26 39,390 4/12/19 951371 1371 Elkridge DrBrowndeer LnLonghill DrEAC 2 4 1,950 32 62,400 4/12/19 951147 1147 Ganado DrPalos Verdes Dr W/s300' W of Palos VerdesEAAC 27 300 44 13,200 3/11/19 951383 1383 Golden Arrow DrDelacroix RdBeechgate DrEAC 2 4 1,075 26 27,950 4/12/19 951285 1330 Golden Meadow DrWillowtree DrClovercliff DrEAC 2 2 550 32 17,600 3/12/19 951631 1631 Goya DrCaddington DrEndEAC 2 3 140 43 6,020 4/15/19 951359 1359 Hawkhurst DrRockvalley Rd S/sHawthorne BlEAC 2 1 1,928 30 57,840 4/12/19 951280 1280 Lomo DrMonero DrSan Nicolas DrEAC 2 2 1,875 32 60,000 4/8/19 951280 1282 Lomo DrEddinghill DrAbbotswood DrEAC 2 2 265 32 8,480 4/8/19 951519 1519 Lunada Ridge DrMoongate DrScotmist RdEAC 2 2 370 33 12,210 4/17/19 951640 1640 Marguerite DrPalos Verdes DrLaurel DrEAC 2 5 1,592 34 54,1284/10/19 951027 1028 Marne DrVallon Dr S/sCartier DrEAC 2 5 1,835 32 58,720 3/1/19951597 1597 Montereina DrToscanini DrBeechham DrEAC 2 3 720 32 23,040 4/11/19 951132 1132 Nautilus DrPalos Verdes Dr N/sEndEAC 2 6 145 40 5,800 3/7/19 951364 1364 Oconto AveWarrior DrEndEAC 2 4 217 35 8,845 4/12/19 951181 1120 Palos Verdes Dr (Frontage Rd) Schooner Dr w/sEndEAC 2 6 1,290 25 32,250 3/7/19 951181 1181 Palos Verdes Dr (Frontage Rd) East EndCalle Adventura E/sEAC 2 7 450 25 12,350 3/14/19 951296 1296 Rothrock DrEddinghill DrTrailrider DrEAC 2 2 1,900 27 51,3004/8/19 951001 1001 Rue BeauprePalos Verdes DrRue LangloisEAC 2 5 185 42 7,770 4/10/19 951004 1004 Rue La FleurRue De La PierreVia BoricaEAC 2 5 868 32 27,776 4/10/19 95Page 15 of 20B-64
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1002 1698 Rue LangloisRue ValoisRue De La PierreEAC 2 5 775 32 24,800 4/10/19 951830 1826 Sea Terrace AveSeabreeze AvSeaview AvEAC 2 3 400 37 14,800 3/7/19 951162 1162 Starline DrCrest Rd N/sNewridge Dr N/sEAC 2 7 1,145 31 35,495 3/13/19 951297 1297 Trailrider DrAbbotswood DrCedarbluff DrEAC 2 2 250 32 8,000 4/8/19 951297 1298 Trailrider DrAmber Gate DrGolden Meadow DrEAC 2 2 880 32 28,160 3/12/19 951693 1693 Tramonto DrPalos Verdes Dr SNuvola CtEAC 2 6 575 30 15,450 3/1/19 951189 1189 Via ColinitaBeauvais Rd S/s175' E/Miraleste Dr (City Limits) EAC 2 3 1,934 25 48,350 3/14/19 951864 1855 Via VicentePalos Verdes DrCalle VientoEAC 2809 22 21,590 4/15/19 951011 1811 Via VictoriaBerry Hill DrVia LoradoEAC 2 5 1,429 32 45,728 4/10/19 951090 1090 Albero CtPalos Verdes DrNorth EndEAC 2 6 1,215 30 37,700 3/1/19 961708 1833 Alley S/Beachview Dr Beachview DrNantasket DrEAC 0937 28 24,836 3/1/19 961291 1291 Briarhurst DrClovercliff DrAbbotswood DrEAC 2 2 1,190 26 30,940 3/28/19 961325 1325 Brookford DrGolden Meadow DrAmber Gate DrEAC 2 2 943 31 29,233 3/12/19 961368 1671 Browndeer LnFlaming Arrow DrElmbridge DrEAC 2 3 1,017 33 33,561 4/12/19 961299 1299 Cherty DrTrailrider DrEndEAC 2 2 105 46 5,930 3/12/19 961094 1094 Coast Site DrSeacove DrSeagate DrEAAC 2 6 1,040 36 37,440 3/1/19 961355 1355 Deepbrook DrHoney Creek DrHawkhurst Dr S/SEAC 2 1 360 32 11,520 4/12/19 961355 1356 Deepbrook DrHawkhurst Dr N/SRockvalley RdEAC 2 1 550 32 17,600 4/12/19 961171 1171 Deluna DrCasilina Dr E/sDianora Dr W/sEAC 2 7 1,686 32 53,952 3/13/19 961168 1168 Dianora DrLuciana DrDeluna Dr S/sEAC 2 7 500 31 15,500 3/13/19961217 1218 Fond Du Lac RdBasswood AvLittlebow RdEAC 2 1 1,720 32 55,0403/28/19 961217 1660 Fond Du Lac RdWaupaca RdBasswood AvEAC 2 1 300 32 9,600 3/28/19 961285 1663 Golden Meadow DrHedgewood DrWillwotree DrEAC 2 2 550 32 17,600 3/12/19 961207 1361 Hawthorne Blvd (Frontage Rd) Hawkhurst DrBlackhorse DrEAC 2 1 300 32 9,600 4/12/19 961206 1206 Kingsridge DrMiraleste DrEndEAC 2 3 900 22 20,570 3/14/19 961377 1377 Larchbluff DrBrowndeer LnEndEAC 2 4 585 26 16,460 4/12/19 961524 1524 Lochvale DrCovecrest DrEndEAC 2 2 390 28 12,170 4/17/19 961323 1323 Loftygrove DrGolden Meadow DrIndian Rock DrEAC 2 2 850 26 22,100 3/12/19 961550 1550 Lorraine RdMiraleste DrEndEAC 2 3 1,190 24 28,560 3/14/19 961861 1834 Lunada VistaPalos Verdes DrEndEAC 2540 30 17,125 4/15/19 961640 1785 Marguerite DrLaurel DrEndEAC 2 5 714 34 25,376 4/10/19 961324 1324 Maycroft DrIndian Rock DrGolden Meadow DrEAC 2 2 730 27 19,710 3/12/19 961680 1680 Nancy RdLorraine RdMiraleste DrEAC 2 3 870 24 20,160 3/14/19 961181 1121 Palos Verdes Dr (Frontage Rd) Conqueror Dr W/sSchooner Dr E/sEAC 2 6 1,655 25 41,375 3/7/19 961181 1131 Palos Verdes Dr (Frontage Rd) Conqueror Dr E/sNautilus DREAAC 2 6 335 27 9,045 3/7/19 961289 1289 Purpleridge DrBriarhurst DrGolden Meadow DrEAC 2 2 1,132 3236,224 3/28/19 961008 1647 Rue De La PierreVia RiveraRue LangloisEAC 2 5 1,170 32 37,440 4/10/19 961115 1125 Schooner DrDauntless DrEndEAAC 2 6 295 30 8,850 3/7/19 961136 1136 Seacliff DrPalos Verdes Dr N/sPalo Vista Dr S/sEAC 2 7 23027 6,210 3/11/19 961384 1384 Seashell WayBeechgate DrEndEAC 2 4 155 31 4,805 4/12/19 961531 1531 Sol Vista LnSunnywise Ridge RdEndEAC 2 3 310 26 8,060 4/9/19 961287 1287 Spruce Grove DrGrovespring DrPurpleridge DrEAC 2 2 680 26 17,680 3/28/19 961530 1742 Sunnyside Ridge RdSol Vista LnEndEAC 2 8 1,550 32 49,600 4/9/19 961113 1113 Tarragon RdBarkentine RdEndEAC 2 6 560 32 17,920 3/7/19 961297 1331 Trailrider DrAbbotswood DrEl Rodeo RdEAC 2 2 500 32 16,000 3/12/19 961189 1191 Via ColinitaVia Ciega N/sPalos Verdes DrEAC 2 3 1,635 26 42,510 3/14/19 961365 1365 Warrior DrBrowndeer LnLonghill DrEAC 2 4 718 32 22,976 4/12/1996Page 16 of 20B-65
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1124 1124 Avenger PlDauntless DrEndEAAC 2 6 130 40 5,200 3/7/19 971233 1748 Basswood AvMazur DrShorewood DrEAC 2 1 1,880 32 60,160 3/28/19971186 1186 Beauvais RdVia ColinitaEndEAC 2 3 500 20 10,000 3/14/19 971368 1368 Browndeer LnWarrior DrFlaming Arrow DrEAC 2 4 300 33 9,900 4/12/19 971176 1176 Calle AventuraPalos Verdes DrEndEAC 2 7 1,737 26 45,162 3/14/19 971172 1172 Casilina DrDeluna DrPalos Verdes DrEAC 2 7 1,300 32 41,600 3/13/19 971511 1511 Covecrest DrShire Oaks DrFirthridge RdEAC 2 2 1,510 32 48,320 4/17/19 971687 1692 Crest RdAvenida ClassicaAvenida EsplendidaEAC 2 5 619 37 22,903 4/17/19 971538 1765 Crownview DrKnoll View DrHighpoint RdEAC 2 8 1,275 32 40,8003/15/19 971042 1042 Dupre DrCartier DrHawthorneEAC 2 5 160 32 5,120 4/15/19 971217 1217 Fond Du Lac RdPembina RdWaupaca RdEAC 2 1 700 32 22,400 3/28/19 971541 1542 Grandpoint LnKnoll View Dr S/sEndEAAC 2 3 650 26 16,900 3/15/19 971329 1329 Hartcrest DrGolden Meadow DrGeronimo DrEAC 2 2 830 26 21,5803/28/19 971302 1302 Hedgewood DrGolden Meadow DrTrailrider DrEAC 2 2 1,065 32 34,080 3/28/19 971212 1232 Indian Peak RdBasswood AvLittlebow RdEAC 2 1 1,630 26 42,380 3/28/19 971543 1782 Knoll View Dr1000' s/o Crownview Dr Grandpoint LnEAC 2 8 1,553 30 46,590 3/15/19 971543 1783 Knoll View DrGrandpoint LnEndEAC 2 8 458 30 13,740 3/15/19 971037 1037 La Croix DrSattes DrCrest RdEAC 2 5 220 32 5,120 3/8/19 971376 1376 Little Wood DrBrowndeer LnEndEAC 2 4 180 30 6,500 4/12/19 971221 1221 Littlebow RdBasswood AvManitowac DrEAC 2 1 1,450 31 44,950 3/28/19 971372 1372 Longhill DrElkridge Dr E/SFlaming Arrow Dr E/SEAC 2 4 1,041 36 37,476 4/12/19 971372 1373 Longhill DrFlaming Arrow Dr E/SSilver Arrow Rd N/SEAC 2 41,915 32 61,280 4/12/19 971166 1166 Luciana DrCrest RdDianora Dr S/sEAC 2 7 200 32 6,400 3/13/19 971187 1187 Maine RdVia ColinitaEndEAC 2 3 215 20 4,300 3/14/19 971002 1003 Rue LangloisRue BeaupreRue ValoisEAC 2 5 1,155 32 36,960 4/10/19 971211 1231 Shorewood RdLittlebow RdIndian Peak RdEAC 2 1 1,305 26 33,930 3/28/19 971328 1328 Starstone DrGeronimo DrGolden Meadow DrEAC 2 2 1,220 26 31,720 3/28/19 971007 1007 Via BoricaVia Rivera1000' n/o Via RiveraEAC 2 5 1,000 32 32,000 4/10/19 971185 1185 Via CiegaVia ColinitaEndEAC 2 3 200 26 5,200 3/14/19 971189 1190 Via ColinitaBeauvais Rd S/sVia Ciega N/sEAC 2 3 1,675 25 41,875 3/14/19 971005 1809 Via RiveraVia Borica1000' n/o Via BoricaEAC 2 5 1,000 32 32,000 4/10/19 971179 1655 Vista Mesa DrSanta Luna E/sPalos Verdes DrEAC 2 7 265 26 6,890 3/14/19 971327 1327 Willowtree DrGolden Meadow DrGeronimo DrEAC 2 2 1,000 26 26,000 3/28/19 971122 1122 Admirable DrAdmirable DrWest EndEAC 2 6 100 40 4,000 3/7/19 981532 1532 Bronco DrPalos Verdes DrMartingale DrEAC 2 3 1,665 26 43,2903/15/19 981029 1645 Cartier DrDupre DrRhone DrEAC 2 5 1,200 32 38,400 3/1/19 981535 1535 Cayuse LnBronco Dr480' N/Chaparral LnEAC 2 3 950 30 28,500 3/15/19 981687 1711 Crest Rd30' W/O Hawthorne BlAvenida ClassicaEAC 2 5 670 56 37,520 4/17/19 981687 1712 Crest RdAvenida EsplendidaAvenida TranquilaEAC 2 5 1,500 3654,000 4/15/19 981538 1539 Crownview DrHighpoint Rd E/s1397' w/o Highpoint DrEAAC 23 1,397 34 47,498 3/15/19 981538 1764 Crownview Dr1397' w/o Highpoint Dr EndEAC 2 8 858 34 29,172 3/15/19 981213 1213 Eau Claire DrShorewood RdIndian Peak RdEAC 2 1 310 32 9,920 3/28/19 981213 1214 Eau Claire DrIndian Peak RdPembina RdEAC 2 1 615 32 19,680 3/28/19 981541 1541 Grandpoint LnHighpoint RdKnoll View Dr N/sEAAC 2 3 1,635 2744,145 3/15/19 981540 1540 Highpoint RdCrownview DrEndEAAC 2 3 1,065 26 27,690 3/15/19 981320 1320 Indian Rock DrBrookford DrEndEAC 2 2 915 32 29,280 3/12/19 981543 1543 Knoll View DrCrownview Dr1000' s/o Crownview DrEAC 2 3 1,000 30 30,000 3/15/19 98Page 17 of 20B-66
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)BranchID Section ID NameFromToSection Rank Surface Type Lanes Zone Length Width Section True Area Date PCI1041 1041 Lebec PlMarne Dr E/sEndEAC 2 5 200 30 7,100 3/1/19 981533 1533 Martingale DrBronco DrEndEAC 2 3 1,300 26 33,800 3/15/19 981651 1651 Nuvola CtAlbero CtEast EndEAC 2 6 1,545 30 47,600 3/1/19 981528 1528 Queenridge DrMeadowmist DrEndEAC 2 2 280 33 10,390 4/17/19 981096 1096 Seahill DrBeachview DrVista Pacifica DrEAC 2 6 135 36 4,860 3/1/19 981211 1211 Shorewood RdHawthorne BlBasswood AvEAC 2 1 1,360 32 43,520 3/28/19 981530 1530 Sunnyside Ridge RdPalos Verdes DrSol Vista LnEAC 2 3 1,47932 47,328 4/9/19 981544 1544 Via CanadaPalos Verdes DrPicardie N/sEAC 2 3 1,260 26 32,7603/15/19 981192 1192 Via FrascatiPalos Verdes DrPalos Verdes DrEAC 2 3 970 20 19,400 3/14/19 981183 1183 Via Subida800' w/ Palos VerdesEndEAC 2 3 515 30 15,450 3/14/19981097 1097 Vista Pacifica DrWest EndEast EndEAC 2 6 400 32 15,000 3/1/19981200 1201 Chandeleur DrDaladier DrRue Le CharleneEAC 2 8 1,520 28 42,560 3/29/19 991204 1204 Daladier DrChandeleur Dr2232 Daladier DrEAC 2 8 1,117 28 31,276 3/29/19 991549 1549 El Tesoro PlVia CanadaEndEAC 2 3 510 24 12,240 3/15/19 991536 1536 Roan DrPalos Verdes DrEndEAC 2 3 540 22 11,880 4/15/19 991202 1202 Rue Le CharleneChandeleur Dr W/sWest EndEAC 2 8 975 30 30,350 3/29/19 991205 1205 Suana DrMiraleste DrEndEAC 2 7 465 32 15,980 3/29/19 991544 1545 Via CanadaPicardie Rd N/sVia CanadaEAC 2 3 1,410 24 33,840 3/15/19 991544 1546 Via CanadaVia De AnzarEndEAC 2 3 1,069 30 32,070 3/15/19 991548 1548 Via De AnzarVia CanadaEl Tosoro PlEAC 2 3 1,165 24 27,960 3/15/19 991195 1195 Via SienaBramante CirVia LorenzoEAC 2 3 735 20 14,700 3/13/19991195 1658 Via SienaVia LorenzoMiraleste DrEAC 2 3 585 20 11,700 3/13/19991547 1547 Via VelardoVia CanadaEndEAC 2 3 140 33 4,620 3/15/19 991879 2010 Cape Point DrLa Rotonda DrEndEAC 2510 36 20,445 4/17/19 1001200 1200 Chandeleur DrMiraleste DrDaladier DrEAC 2 8 245 30 7,350 3/29/19 1001104 1104 Channelview CtSeawolf DrEndEAC 2 6 740 27 21,130 3/1/19 1001193 1193 Corsini PlPalos Verdes DrEndEAC 2 3 285 26 7,410 3/15/19 1001204 1766 Daladier Dr2232 Daladier DrEndEAC 2 8 1,499 28 41,972 3/29/191001881 2040 Emerald View DrLa Rotonda DrEndEAC 21,155 30 35,277 4/17/191001880 2020 Isthmus View DrLa Rotonda DrEndEAC 2265 36 11,575 4/17/19 1001135 1135 La Rotonda DrPalos Verdes Dr SEndEAC 2 7 1,900 36 68,400 3/15/19 1001534 1534 Mustang RdBronco DrSurrey Ln N/SEAC 2 3 1,375 26 35,750 3/15/19 1001696 1696 Picardie RdVia CanadaPalos Verdes DrEAC 2 3 790 30 23,700 3/15/19 1001202 1203 Rue Le CharleneChandeleur Dr W/sEast EndEAC 2 8 1,102 35 31,888 3/29/19 1001882 2030 Twin Harbors View Dr La Rotonda DrEndEAC 2480 30 16,670 4/17/19 1001199 1199 Via BramanteVia Bramante PzMiraleste DrEAC 2 3 240 20 4,800 3/13/19 1001197 1197 Via Bramante PlazaVia LorenzoVia LorenzoEAC 1 3 400 25 10,000 3/13/19 1001194 1194 Via Del PlazaMiraleste PlazaVia Bramante PzEAC 2 3 315 20 6,300 3/13/19 1001196 1196 Via LorenzoVia SienaVia BramanteEAC 2 3 1,100 25 27,500 3/13/19 1001198 1198 Via VicoVia LorenzoMiraleste DrEAC 2 3 325 20 6,500 3/13/19 100108.617,620,075Page 18 of 20B-67
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)Condition PCI Range Arterial Local Total % of NetworkVery Good 86‐100 26.7 91.2 117.978.5%52.4Good 75‐85 10.2 15.6 25.817.2%34.1Fair 60‐74 3.4 1.6 5.03.3%11.5Poor 41‐59 1.2 0.1 1.30.9%2Very Poor 0‐40 0.0 0.1 0.10.1%0.141.5 108.6 150.1Rank Mileage SF PCI 2013 PCI 2016 PCI 2019Arterial41.5 6,997,925 82.3 83.1 87.4Locals108.6 17,620,075 81.6 85.1 89.5Citywide 150.1 24,618,000 81.9 84.6 88.9Page 19 of 20B-68
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CAPavement Condition Index (PCI) Report ‐ All StreetsSorted by Rank, PCI (0‐100)Very Good; 117.9; 79%Good; 25.8; 17%Fair; 5.0; 3%Poor; 1.3; 1%Very Poor; 0.1; 0%PCI Distribution For All Streets (by Section Mi.)Very GoodGoodFairPoorVery PoorVery Good; 26.7; 64%Good; 10.2; 25%Fair; 3.4; 8%Poor; 1.2; 3%Very Poor; 0.0; 0%PCI Distribution For Arterial Streets (by Section Mi.)Very GoodGoodFairPoorVery PoorVery Good; 91.2; 84%Good; 15.6; 14%Fair; 1.6; 2%Poor; 0.1; 0%Very Poor; 0.1; 0%PCI Distribution For Local Streets (by Section Mi.)Very GoodGoodFairPoorVery PoorPage 20 of 20B-69
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
RFP- Pavement Management System Update
September 8, 2021
Attachment B
Sample Professional Services Agreement
B-70
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 1
CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT
By and Between
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
and
____________________________________
B-71
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG
AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND
______________________________________
THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and
entered into on ______________________, 2021, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO
PALOS VERDES, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and
_________________________, a [form of company] (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be
referred to, individually or collectively, as “Party” or “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals, the performance of the
services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.
B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal for the performance of the services
defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to
perform those services.
C. Pursuant to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, City has authority to
enter into and execute this Agreement.
D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those
services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms
of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the
Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
1.1 Scope of Services.
In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide
those services specified in the “Scope of Services”, as stated in the Proposal, attached hereto as
Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the
“services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement,
Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities
necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough,
competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services
contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its
ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it
shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required
hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended.
For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those
B-72
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 2
standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under
similar circumstances.
1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.
The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s Proposal which shall be incorporated
herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between
the terms of such Proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.
1.3 Compliance with Law.
Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in
accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any
Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is
rendered.
1.4 California Labor Law.
If the Scope of Services includes any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms
are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations,
Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall
pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code
section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws, including the following
requirements:
(a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that some or all of the work to be
performed under this Agreement is a “public work” as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and
that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1
(commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts
and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”)
implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance
monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by
regulation.
(b) Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent
required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the
prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any
interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Consultant
acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination of
the prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post a copy of the same at each job site
where work is performed under this Agreement.
(c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall comply with
and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment
of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The
Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit $200 (two hundred dollars) for each calendar day,
or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for
B-73
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 3
the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this
Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.
(d) Payroll Records. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the
provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subconsultant to: keep
accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified
in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by
Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records.
(e) Apprentices. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions
of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8,
Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant
shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable
occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with
a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within 60 (sixty)
days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subconsultants
shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed
under this Agreement.
(f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Consultant acknowledges that 8 (eight) hours labor
constitutes a legal day's work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section
1810.
(g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by
the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess
hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit $25 (twenty five dollars) for each
worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor
for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more tha n 8
(eight) hours in any one calendar day and 40 (forty) hours in any one calendar week in violation
of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor
Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of 8 (eight) hours per
day, and 40 (forthy) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon
compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than 1½ (one and one
half) times the basic rate of pay.
(h) Workers’ Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700
provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its
employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section
1861, Consultant certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require
every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to
undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will
comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of
this contract.”
Consultant’s Authorized Initials ________
B-74
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 4
(i) Consultant’s Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor
who will perform work under this Agreement, Consultant shall be responsible for such
subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of
the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract with
any subcontractor for work under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to take all actions
necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance, including
without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor on a
periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers
the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or
rectify any such failure by any subcontractor.
1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.
Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as
may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant
shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties
and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s
performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold
harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes,
penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.
1.6 Familiarity with Work.
By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly
investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered
how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and
restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve
work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or
will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services
hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially
affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of
such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received
from the Contract Officer in the form of a Change Order.
1.7 Care of Work.
The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish
continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies
and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such
damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or
damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.
1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties.
Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective
obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments,
prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes
B-75
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 5
of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of
the other.
1.9 Additional Services.
City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without
invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or
make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work m ay be
undertaken unless a written Change Order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant,
incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work,
and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written
approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to 15% of the Contract Sum; or,
in the time to perform of up to 90 (ninety) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer through
a written Change Order. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be
approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this
Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby
acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of
Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant
shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute
discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract
Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are
followed.
If in the performance of the contract scope, the Consultant becomes aware of material defects in
the scope, duration or span of the contract or the Consultant becomes aware of extenuating
circumstance that will or could prevent the completion of the contract, on time or on budget, the
Consultant shall inform the Contracting Officer of an anticipated Change Order. This proposed
change order will stipulate, the facts surrounding the issue, proposed solutions, proposed costs and
proposed schedule impacts.
1.10 Special Requirements.
Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof
are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein
by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other
provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern.
ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
2.1 Contract Sum.
Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the
amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and
incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual
expenses, shall not exceed $XXX (_______________ Dollars) (the “Contract Sum”), unless
additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.9. Annual compensation shall not
exceed $___________ (_____________ Dollars).
B-76
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 6
2.2 Method of Compensation.
The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii)
payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services; (iii)
payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of
Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, and
(b) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the
Schedule of Compensation.
2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.
Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for
reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in
advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5,
and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the
attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City.
Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If
Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant
shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.
2.4 Invoices.
Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice, using the City template,
or in a format acceptable to the City, for all work performed and expenses incurred during the
preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for
payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the
Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following
categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor
contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not
invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.
City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine
whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this
Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant
which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause
Consultant to be paid within 45 (forty-five) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed
invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures,
the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges
or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for
correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the
Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable
law.
2.5 Waiver.
Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed
to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.
B-77
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 7
ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
3.1 Time of Essence.
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
3.2 Schedule of Performance.
Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a
written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the
“Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this
reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the
Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer through a Change
Order, but not exceeding 90 (ninety) days cumulatively.
3.3 Force Majeure.
The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the
services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to
unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant,
including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires,
earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars,
litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall
within 10 (ten) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of
the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and
extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the
judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall
be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled
to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however
caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.
3.4 Term.
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding [INSERT
PERFORMANCE PERIOD] from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule
of Performance (Exhibit “D”). The City may, in its discretion, extend the Term by [INSERT
NUMBER OF EXTENSIONS] additional [INSERT DURATION OF EXTENSIONS]-year terms.
ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK
4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.
The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the
principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work
specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
__________________________ __________________________
B-78
-
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 8
(Name) (Title)
__________________________ __________________________
(Name) (Title)
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the
foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.
Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for
directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the
services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be
under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the
foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced
by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize
only the personnel included in the Proposal to perform services pursuant to this Agreement.
Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of
Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this
Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors,
if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any
such performance. City shall have the right to approve or reject any proposed replacement
personnel, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
4.2 Status of Consultant.
Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation,
debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless
such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in
writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any
of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or
agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall
obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to
City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights.
4.3 Contract Officer.
The Contract Officer shall be [INSERT NAME OF CONTRACT OFFICER] or such
person as may be designated by the [INSERT DEPARTMENT HEAD]. It shall be the Consultant’s
responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the
performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by
City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required
hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have
authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all do cuments on behalf of the City
required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.
B-79
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 9
4.4 Independent Consultant.
Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or
means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except
as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or
control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number,
compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an
independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent
contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any
time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees
of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of
Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with
Consultant.
4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.
The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and
employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore,
Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services
required hereunder without the express written approval of the City; all subcontractors included in
the Proposal are deemed approved. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may
be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of
law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City.
Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting
in concert of more than 25% (twenty five percent) of the present ownership and/or control of
Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such
unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No
approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder
without the express consent of City.
ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
5.1 Insurance Coverages.
Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any
services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense
during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below
and in a form satisfactory to City.
(a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general
liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in
an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily
injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has
not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not
be accepted.
(b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile
insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and
B-80
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 10
property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Services
to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or
rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.
(c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall
maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection
with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any
policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this
Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than
three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.
(d) Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’
Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at
least $1,000,000).
(e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds
under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein.
(f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required
in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”.
5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City
as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation
endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be
approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification
of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any
time.
(b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property,
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by
Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
(c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be
primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required
to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of
primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be
endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-
contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self -insurance shall
be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
(d) City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required
under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced,
City has the right but not the duty to obtain and continuously maintain the insurance it deems
B-81
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 11
necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will
withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City
may cancel this Agreement.
(e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance
company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or
that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned
policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in
accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the
City’s Risk Manager.
(f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured
pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or
appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specificall y allow
Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to
waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery
against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of
its subconsultants.
(g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant
acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform
Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City
nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
(h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or
limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other
requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference
to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and
is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or
a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above,
the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the
Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of
insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
(i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or
broker and insurers to provide to City with a 30 (thirty) day notice of cancellation (except for
nonpayment for which a 10 (ten) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each
required coverage.
(j) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be
endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall
be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella
liability policies.
(k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages
required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting
endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing.
B-82
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 12
(l) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for
all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of
liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
(m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants,
subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in
the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements
required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes
all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements
of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants,
subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review.
(n) Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any
time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by
giving the Consultant 90 (ninety) days advance written notice of such change. If such change
results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate
Consultant’s compensation.
(o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated,
lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these
specifications unless approved by City.
(p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely
notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance
under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability
policies.
(q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own
cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary
for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
5.3 Indemnification.
To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold
and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative,
arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties,
obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or
liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in
connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity
for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’
reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance
of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in
connection therewith:
B-83
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 13
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with
any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs
and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the
City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in
connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations
or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City,
its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom;
(c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a
party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such
damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance
of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder,
Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs
and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or
proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees.
Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it
fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and
failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This
indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or
omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional
services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as
a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted
by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that
design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of
the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity
obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination
of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION
6.1 Records.
Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts,
invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the
disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as
shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract
Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and
detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times
during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records
and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years
following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in
the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the
books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant ’s successor
in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in
B-84
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 14
providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is
required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.
6.2 Reports.
Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports
concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer
shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of
work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees
that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or
will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if
Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall
promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the
estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design
services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.
6.3 Ownership of Documents.
All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes,
computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”)
prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this
Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract
Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further
employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of
ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or
assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents
without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without
liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use,
reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant
shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for
assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant
fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting
therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as
“works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby
deemed “works made for hire” for the City.
6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in
performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the
public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such
information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written
authorization from the Contract Officer.
(b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not,
without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City
Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions,
B-85
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 15
response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this
Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided
Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of
Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City
shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and
fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.
(d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at
any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and
to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by
Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by
City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION
7.1 California Law.
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to
performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions
concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be
instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other
appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal
jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District
Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los
Angeles, State of California.
7.2 Disputes; Default.
In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall
not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after
the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons
for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default.
This timeframe is 15 (fifteen) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances
warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and
shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City
may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of
default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this
Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s
default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out
of any provision of this Agreement.
7.3 Retention of Funds.
B-86
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 16
Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant
(whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in
dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or
damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by
reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failin g to perform Consultant’s
obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount
or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear
to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for
interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City
to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the
Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.
7.4 Waiver.
Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any
party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other
provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.
Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of
the provisions of this Agreement. No dela y or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by
a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other
default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this
Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party
of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or
different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the
other party.
7.6 Legal Action.
In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in
equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel
specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any
other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary
provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections
905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.
7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.
This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided
in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the r ight to terminate this
Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 (thirty) days’ written notice to Consultant,
except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be
such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. Upon receipt of any notice of
B-87
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 17
termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be
specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all
services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services
authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or
such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event
of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the City need not provide the Consultant
with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.
7.8 Termination for Default of Party.
If termination is due to the failure of the other Party to fulfill its obligations under this
Agreement:
(a) City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work
and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable
to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the
compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such
damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or
partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.
(b) Consultant may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, terminate the
Agreement upon written notice to the City‘s Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to
payment for all work performed up to the date of termination.
7.9 Attorneys’ Fees.
If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any
action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action
or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable,
shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any
appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable
costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs
the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued
on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted
to judgment.
ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION
8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.
No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any
successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which
may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms
of this Agreement.
8.2 Conflict of Interest.
B-88
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 18
Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall
acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests
of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this
Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person
having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor
without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid
conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the
performance of this Agreement.
No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in
this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the
Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation,
partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any
State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay
or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.
Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons
claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of,
any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual
orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of
this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and
that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion,
sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.
8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.
Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection
therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ
such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement,
and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens,
Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions
imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.
ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
9.1 Notices.
Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party
desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either
served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager
and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Rancho Palos
Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 and in the case of the
Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement.
Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing.
B-89
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 19
Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72)
hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.
9.2 Interpretation.
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the
language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of
this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
9.3 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.
9.4 Integration; Amendment.
This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive
expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements
between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels
any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between
the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification
of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by
the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be
waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
9.5 Severability.
In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections
contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or
decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any
of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are
hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder
unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit
of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.
9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.
No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this
Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating
to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any
corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectl y interested, or in
violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly
interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of
“financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be
“remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant
warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party
including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or
other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement.
B-90
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 20
Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s),
or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or
other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or
employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is
aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such
payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void a nd of
no force or effect.
Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______
9.7 Corporate Authority.
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such
party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execut e and deliver this
Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally
bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not
violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall
be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
B-91
Attachment B
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG 21
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the date and year first-above written.
CITY:
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a
municipal corporation
Eric Alegria, Mayor
ATTEST:
Emily Colborn, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
William W. Wynder, City Attorney
CONSULTANT:
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from
each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any
Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT ’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE
DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE
BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S
BUSINESS ENTITY.
B-92
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On __________, 2021 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: _____________________________________
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER____________________________
___
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_________________________________________
____
_________________________________________
____
___________________________________
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________
DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that
document.
B-93
□ □
□ □ □ □ □ □
□
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On __________, 2021 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: _____________________________________
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form .
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER____________________________
___
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_________________________________________
____
_________________________________________
____
___________________________________
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________
DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that
document.
B-94
□ □
□ □ □ □ □ □
□
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG A-1
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
[ATTACH SCOPE OF SERVICES FROM PROPOSAL]
B-95
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG B-1
EXHIBIT “B”
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)
Added text indicated in bold italics, deleted text indicated in strikethrough.
[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
B-96
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG C-1
EXHIBIT “C”
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
[INSERT COMPENSATION FROM PROPOSAL]
B-97
Attachment G
01203.0001/699504.1 EQG C-2
EXHIBIT “D” SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
[INSERT SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE FROM PROPOSAL]
B-98
PROPOSAL FOR ROADWAY ASSET MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM AND PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM UPDATE
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
October 4, 2021
Submitted by:
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
C-1
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Pavement Condition 2019
Table of Contents
City of Rancho Palos Verdes TOC
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Section Page
Table of Contents, Cover Letter TOC
Approach to Scope of Services ........................ 1-1 Project Understanding/Approach ................................................... 1-1
Scope of Work ................................................................................. 1-3
Organization and Staffing ................................ 2-1 Bucknam PMP / Roadway Asset Qualifications .............................. 2-1
Organization Chart .......................................................................... 2-2
Delineation Narrative of Bucknam Infrastructure Group ............... 2-2
Support Asset Management Services (RAS) ................................... 2-3
Staff Qualification and Experience ................... 3-1 Key Project Team Members ............................................................ 3-1 Relevant Prior Project Experience .................................................. 3-1
Staff Qualifications (Resumes) ........................................................ 3-1
Reference Projects .......................................................................... 3-2
Project Schedule ............................................. 4-1 Critical Path Method Schedule ....................................................... 4-1
Quality Control Plan ........................................ 5-1 Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan ....................................... 5-1
Acceptance of Conditions ................................ 6-1 Company Statement ....................................................................... 6-1
1
4
2
3
5
6
C-2
□
□
□
□
October 6, 2021
Mr. James O’Neill
Project Manager
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Subject: Proposal for Roadway Asset Management Program and Pavement
Management System Update
Dear Mr. O’Neill,
It is our pleasure to submit our proposal to assist the City of Rancho Palos Verdes in the
continued, proactive management of your Pavement Management Program (PMP) and other
essential roadway assets. With the City seeking to move toward stronger infrastructure
management methodologies through advanced pavement inspections, district maintenance,
PMP software interoperability, Capital Improvement reporting (CIP), asset management
correlation, and GIS implementation, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. has identified a
proactive and cost efficient method to assist the City in implementing a successful PMP/ROW
project. Our team will focus our long-term PMP knowledge, extensive Los Angeles County
experience and GIS/GPS technologies to optimize the City’s maintenance dollars by
implementing a manageable and reliable PMP methodology.
Our firms current PMP Project Manager performed the 2013, 2016 and 2019 Rancho Palos
Verdes PMP projects where we tied all PMP/Sidewalk assets to the City’s GIS Enterprise and
delivered all required GIS shapefiles related to the PMP. Our project staff can be relied upon
again to provide continued, outstanding service to the City because we will assist the City in
implementing a common-sense PMP, formulate a proactive CIP budget and make realistic
maintenance recommendations through our:
Relevant and accurate PMP services based on our ongoing work with numerous Los
Angeles, Orange County and Inland Empire local agencies such as:
o 27 Los Angeles County local agencies (31%);
o 17 Orange County local agencies (50%); and
o 12 San Diego/Inland Empire local agencies
Additionally, Bucknam was selected by OCTA in July, 2021 to perform a county-wide
PMP assessment for all 35 local agencies and perform a 10-yr budgetary model that
identifies required revenues to sustain or achieve a PCI over 75
Use of Bucknam-Fuscoe “Cloud-based Learning Technology” Artificial Intelligence (AI) to
calculate, compare and qualify all AC/PCC asphalt SF’s within the City of RPV
C-3
BUCKNAM I 1Ne1<A~ 11<u<. 1 Ul<t <>t<UU>', IN<. I
3548 Seagate Way, Suite 230
Oceanside, CA 92056
T: (760) 216-6529
www.bucknam-inc.com
Local-Orange County knowledge and experience gained through our management of 80
local agency PMP’s within Southern California. Over the past two years, Mr. Peter
Bucknam served as Project Manager for numerous Los Angeles County PMP projects
(i.e. El Segundo, Lomita, Gardena, Long Beach (MyRoads™), Compton, Lawndale,
Lynwood, South Gate, Bellflower, Brea, Glendora, Pomona, Covina, Monterey Park,
Alhambra) and he has personally managed over 500 PMP projects over the past twenty
years
Project/engineering experience that brings the understanding that MicroPAVER results
are not set in stone; we proactively use the available data to enhance budget
forecasting, project planning and maintenance zone development
Professional Engineering experience through our Principal, Mr. Steve Bucknam, P.E. who
brings 40+ years of public/private local agency experience. Mr. Bucknam has served as
City Engineer, Deputy City Manager, Design Engineer and Utilities Director for numerous
public agencies
As Project Manager, my goal is not just to meet the requirements of this project but establish a
living document (Arterial & Local pavement CIP / Prop. C - METRO submittal) that will be used
throughout the term of the CIP as well as implement achievable long-term infrastructure
management goals in coordination with City schedules.
Offeror: Bucknam Infrastructure Group, 3548 Seagate Way, Suite 230, Oceanside, CA
92056; Company FID # 45-2723662 (S-Corp)
Mr. Steve Bucknam, P.E. (Principal) will be responsible for all project oversight
(steve@bucknam.net). Mr. Peter Bucknam (Project Manager) will be providing day-
to-day operational / management services and deliverables; he is authorized to sign
the agreement for this contract. He can be contacted at 760-216-6529 (work) 714-501-
1024 (cell) or email at peter@bucknam-inc.com.
By selecting Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., the City of Rancho Palos Verdes will continue to
receive a strong, knowledgeable, innovative, and communicative team with the experience to
implement a cost-effective pavement management program. Our handpicked pavement
management professionals are committed to delivering quality services to the City. We have
already scheduled time for your project and eagerly await our kick-off meeting with City staff
and you.
This proposal is valid for ninety (90) days. The City’s RFP is incorporated in its entirety as part of
our proposal and all information submitted within our proposal is true and correct. We are
unaware of any conflict of interest in perform the proposed work.
Respectfully submitted,
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
Peter J. Bucknam
President
C-4
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-1
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Project Understanding / Approach
As the City of Rancho Palos Verdes’ (RPV) infrastructure matures, the City’s staff is striving to
update the City’s Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program (PMP) through “triennial”
cost effective condition surveys, engineering cost evaluation, budgetary reporting and data
updates within the
MicroPAVER database. The
City’s 2021 focus for field
pavement/sidewalk
inspections will cover all
defined streets and alleys
within the network (150 miles).
The City requires a team that will not only resurvey the defined sections using cost-conscious
methodologies but will create a comprehensive program that includes the enhancement of your
8-year PMP/ROW CIP, district maintenance evaluation, GIS integration/publication, stewardship
of the PMP, MyRoads™ PMP web-portal, and presentation of PMP/RAMP findings and
recommendations to upper management, City Council and IMAC.
Our firm is in the unique position for this project due to our 2019 PMP and Sidewalk inventories
where we established essential cornerstone data for this project. Bucknam will continue to
provide these services through our proactive and accurate implementation of your PMP; we will
address the City’s primary goals of:
• Updating MicroPAVER with 2021 inspections, work history and maintenance data;
• Surveying 150 miles of Arterial, Collector, Local and Alley streets; provide variance PCI
reporting based upon 2019 PCI’s vs. 2021;
• Verifying / Updating pavement centerline and metric data (PMP vs. GIS) through our AI
AC/PCC SF calculations;
• Generating 2021 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ratings for each segment as well as
additional conditions for assets inventoried under this project;
• Field inspections, investigations and testing of assets (e.g. traffic control elements,
compliance for curb & gutter, guardrails, etc.);
• Developing a proactive preventative slurry seal / overlay maintenance schedules based
on existing capital funding (citywide approach vs. traditional zone cycle schedule);
• Establishing solid recommendations for current / future maintenance needs;
• Utilizing the City’s existing funding to generate a baseline 8-year year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) for all assets evaluated;
• Recommending alternative maintenance budgets that demonstrate realistic return-on-
investments (ROI), i.e. Scenarios 1, 2, 3, “actual” budget model, maintain PCI model, etc.
C-5
Roadway Assets/ Pavement Management Update
Str eets Concre te Medians
Sidew a l ks Guard r a i ls
........ Pa rking. Lots . ( 6 .Loca tions) ........................ Pavem en t .M arki ngs .............. .
Cu rb & Gutter ....... Ro ad way.Signs ................ .
Cu rb Ram p s
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-2
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
We have defined detailed phases to the scope of work in accordance to the City’s RFP;
1. Project Implementation
2. Client Satisfaction
3. Project Schedule (See Section 5)
4. Scope of Work (Major Tasks)
1) Project Implementation
TASK 1.1: Project Kickoff
The first step in implementing a successful pavement management program truly
resides in frequent communication and timely scheduled data updates. For the City of
RPV it will be essential to establish, up front, the Public Works department
(Engineering/Maintenance) pavement management priorities. Our team will set a
Project Kickoff meeting to further discuss and review in detail the expectations of the
project, technical approach, section ID / GIS management & surveys, district/zone
maintenance, roadway asset inventories and condition assessments, software upgrades
& use, deliverables within the scope of work and the review of schedule.
This effort will build consensus between the Public Works and Maintenance staff as well
as build stronger ARTERIAL and LOCAL maintenance programs that complement large
Public Works CIP projects and annual maintenance projects.
Deliverable: Meeting minutes, revised project schedule (if necessary)
TASK 1.2: Project Status Meetings - Quality Control Program
Status Meetings and Progress Reports
• Minimum of four meetings during the project (kickoff, field, and status meetings
– 30%, 65% and 100% ), Field review meetings and bi-weekly progress status
reports will be delivered to City project manager
• We have included our detailed Quality Control Plan within Section 5 of our
proposal
Deliverable: Monthly Project Status reports, field review and project status meetings,
QA/QC Plan
2) Client Satisfaction
TASK 2.1: Project Deliverables
Shown throughout our Scope of Work, each Task is summarized with project
deliverables. Client satisfaction will derive from frequent communication with the
Project Manager and key staff members from the Public Works departments. Project
success is created by delivering on three main factors;
C-6Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-3
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
1) Adherence to scope tasks and deliverables
2) Performing to the standard set by the Project Schedule; and
3) Controlling costs. Our Project Manager will follow each of these factors throughout
the duration of the project
Deliverable: Project Status Updates, as stated in Task 1.2
3) Project Schedule
TASK 3.1: Work Flow / Project Schedule
Per the request of the RFP, we have included the Critical Path Method (CPM) Project Schedule
within Section 4 of our proposal.
4) Scope of Work (Major Tasks)
Roadway Asset / PMP Assessment - PMP Preliminary Investigations
The City will provide the most recent GIS data, shapefiles and existing PMP data which will serve
as the initial dataset to verify and/or update essential PMP and ROW data. Bucknam will assess:
• City’s current RPV 4-18-19.e70 MicroPAVER database;
• Relevant work history data which has occurred since 2019;
• GIS files related to the 2019 PMP and Sidewalk project vs. City current;
• Street and Right-of-Way (Sidewalk) Record drawings; and
• Assess and verify available City data pertaining to parking lots, C&G, concrete medians,
guardrails pavement markings and roadway signs.
TASK 4.1: Roadway Asset / PMP Work History Update
The City will provide Bucknam a complete listing of all major work (overlay, slurry, etc.) in order
to update specific section work histories and PCI ratings. Bucknam will review all maintenance
and rehabilitation projects completed and/or scheduled by the City since the last update in
2019; this will include work history updates on arterial, locals and alleys.
Our staff will enter the necessary work history updates as mentioned above (i.e. data entry of
maintenance / rehabilitation activities) into your MicroPAVER software. Once the project is
completed, our staff will upload the necessary PMP database files at the City.
Deliverable: Update Roadway / PMP data, Work History report
C-7Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-4
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT/ROADWAY ASSET CONDITION INVENTORYS
TASK 4.2: Conduct Pavement Condition Survey
First and foremost, the assessment of the City’s pavement segmentation is one of the key
priorities for this project. With three years between major inspections it will be essential to
verify that all Arterial, Collector and Local segmentation is up-to-date and that section SF
quantities are verified, accurate and reliable. This will be completed by utilizing the Bucknam-
Fuscoe cloud-based learning technology (AI) to correct quantify square footages for each
pavement section (see sample below).
Bucknam (powered by
Fuscoe’s unique use of
cloud-based learning
technology technology)
allows our staff to
provide the AI with the
City of RPV’s most
recent aerial image; in
doing so, all AC and PCC
pavement areas are
immediately calculated. This instant calculation is possible due to the cloud-based learning
tech’s inherent working knowledge of how to recognize pavement surfaces and asphalt types.
This ability will allow Bucknam to obtain the necessary quality control measurements for all RPV
PMP segments and to perform segment SF variance reports. This will in turn create a more
accurate total centerline / square footage of the RPV network as well as for each unique
pavement segments. Medians can also be identified using this AI technology.
We will review/assess new and/or missing streets previously excluded from the last PMP update
and create the necessary segmentation within the RPV PMP database + GIS links.
Once the pavement segmentation has been assessed and verified, the necessary 150 miles of
Arterial, Collector, Local and Alley inspections will be performed. It is the City’s desire to survey
all pavement sections this fiscal year.
Our survey methodology will include the following approach based on the ASTM D6433
guidelines:
1. Walking - All sections are surveyed through “two-pass test” walking methodologies. AC/PCC
distress types will be collected based upon actual surface conditions and physical
characteristics of the segment.
Surveying methods will be conducted by remaining consistent with ASTM D6433-20 & the
Army Corp of Engineers AC/PCC sampling guidelines while being flexible to current City
requirements.
C-8
1 -01i¥i 11~ ~dll\:in ~,k
,.,,,.illll '-" I.ARIA( A-:1itol i,
ut l l1...-I (.umpl1> t1f!,L:,t..,.
Av1::w/l r wnhlio V:1!ky)
J l'...,,lld b.ir.td , ... ,rni,,e
t r eh.-..'ll(lr,,M.it1:r;:1r-ri.,1
,mi.I gtflCldtc, AC
p,IV,:,n'i1>111 lar-Ari"lt1,.
wl1il i: 11<:l,lll•1:1li~ pee·
l -GIS N,-,un !JI u,,..
l:ity'!\P:,"<"ITW't'lr
,t,g1111,~1h D l~li1...:J •11d
S► ·:: .,IY' l"fl»'rrdNI w ithi,,
Sl1....:L<t,,.,.,,
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-5
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
All sample locations are observed through walking surveys; samples areas will cover a
minimum of 20% of the total section area and will be 2,500 SF +/- 1,000 SF in size.
According to the City’s RFP the following pavement sections are to be surveyed for the
upcoming 2021 PMP update:
• The inspection of approximately 150 centerline miles of Arterial / Collector, Local
and Alley segments will be performed;
• Parking Lots (6 Total, Civic Center, Point Vicente, Fred Hesse, Robert Ryan, Del Cerro
and Eastview);
• Recent overlay rehabilitation will reduce total mileage of survey – TBD;
Our use of Tablet-based units allows our staff to collect pavement data with the City of RPV’s
PMP database live in the field. At the end of the day all electronic data is transferred to our
office for quality control and management.
Roadway Verification Survey - A listing of the field attribute data that is updated/verified during
the survey for the pavement management database is listed below:
2. Field Attribute Data (updated and/or verified)
From/to, indicating the assigned limits of the section, sample test areas, street name
Historical PCI tracking from previous inspections and 2021 PCI inspections
Segment rank, length, width, and total true area of the section
Pavement segment and PCI “Variance” analysis and report
3. Conditional data will be evaluated for all street segments and will include:
MicroPAVER 20 AC & 19 PCC distresses by type, severity and extent
Sampling/conditional data pulled from within edge-of-pavement to edge-of pavement
PCI ratings (0-100), taking into account the surface condition, level of distress
4. Section Distress and PCI Reporting
Upon 50% and 100% completion of the required condition surveys, we will prepare draft PCI
Reports and PCI GIS maps that document the conditions of all pavement segments.
SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT AND CONDITION INVENTORY
TASK 4.2a: Sidewalk / Curb & Gutter / Curb Ramp GIS Digitization
Per the City’s RFP’s request, Bucknam has provided below a detailed Sidewalk-C&G / Curb Ramp
Condition scope of work. Based upon the City’s approximate 150 miles of streets we are
estimating that the City has 220 miles of sidewalks defined within its network (75% of the
network having sidewalks on both sides of the street).
Bucknam will update / establish a clear and accurate citywide Sidewalk / Curb Ramp GIS layer
that represents where known sidewalk locations exist today (polyline based, currently in-hand);
C-9Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-6
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Curb ramps will be point-located. This work effort will include the assessment and improvement
of all existing sidewalk GIS line work, existence/absence of curb ramp locations. This
establishment of the Sidewalk / Curb Ramp GIS layers will in turn drive our conditional
inspections.
Our staff will utilize the City’s available pavement segmentation data, within the RPV pavement
database, to improve upon the sidewalk segmentation, unique sidewalk ID, survey limits and
schedule data. Our staff will utilize additional data such as the City’s GIS centerline, aerial
imagery and other viable data to assist our field operations.
In improving upon the Sidewalk Management Program (SMP) database, sidewalk locations will
be updated/digitized through ArcGIS Desktop utilizing available aerial imagery, completed street
improvement plans and digital roadway imagery. Sidewalk “gaps” will be located/noted.
Sidewalk distress data (trip hazards) will be collected through the use of mobile GPS hand-held
units, providing a XY coordinates for all distress locations. Through the use of our enhanced
ESRI GIS Collector units we utilize the data capture screen to record inventory and inspection
data defined by this scope of work.
Another essential data collection item to establish prior to survey is what defines sidewalk
displacement/trip hazards for potential maintenance and repair. These displacement locations
will be categorized with low, medium or high deficiency ratings. These details are shown within
Tasks 4.2b & 4.2c; as stated above, we will meet with City staff to define the final deficiency
rating definitions prior to survey.
Deliverable: Definition of RPV Sidewalk Section network, inventory attributes, GIS data
integration plan
TASK 4.2b: Update of Sidewalk Maintenance Database
Based on our previous 2019 sidewalk management project as well as our projects performed for
other SoCal cities, we have provided the list below demonstrating typical layers and attributes
collected during sidewalk inspections:
Sidewalk Distresses Attributes / GIS Data
• House Number – House number closest to distress, if applicable;
• Street Name – Street Name;
• Surface Type – i.e. AC, Brick, Paver, PCC;
• Distress Material Location – sidewalk, C&G, Ramp;
• Vertical displacement – i.e. ¼” to 1”, 1” to 2”, 2” or higher
o Displacement ranges – Defined by City’s current Sidewalk Inspection Program
(may be changed per discussions with City);
o Distress Type – i.e. joint faulting, linear cracking, divided slab, buckled slab;
• Sensitive Location – Schools, Parks, City Facilities, etc. Locations to be determined by
City Staff;
• Tree – If distress is caused by a tree;
C-10Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-7
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
• Utility Box – If distress is caused by a utility box;
o Utility label/type, if any;
• Length – Length of distress, if applicable;
• Recommended Work – i.e. Grind, Ramp, Replace;
• MicroPAVER ID – Unique ID that corresponds with PMP Street GIS Layer;
• Any hazards or sidewalk damage that may not meet requirements of repair to be noted
for future inspections;
• Field notes (if applicable) and inspection date associated with distress priority location;
• Comments – Field for any necessary comments about the distress.
We will finalize each GIS layer’s attributes
with the City staff before beginning the
survey process. Bucknam will deliver all GIS
data in the City’s preferred GIS format.
Through our experience in working with
sidewalk GIS datasets and MicroPAVER we
are approaching the development and future
management of the RPV sidewalk
assessment in the following manner:
Sample screenshot of Bucknam’s 2019 Sidewalk
Map Atlas utilized for inspections
Perform all sidewalk data collection/condition assessment through the use of mobile
GPS driven hand-held technologies and personal computers.
o This creates a real-time, accurate GIS database for each distress location
Publish collected sidewalk GIS data into the City’s existing GIS Enterprise for field use,
data analysis, reporting and management
TASK 4.2c: Sidewalk / Curb & Gutter / Curb Ramp Condition Survey
Once the street/pavement segmentation has been assessed and verified, the inspection of
approximately 220 miles of sidewalk segments will be performed. Data will be
assessed/collected by following the pavement segment breakdown established within the PMP;
both sides of the street will be captured. Our survey methodology will include the following
approach:
• FY 2021 – citywide sidewalk, curb & gutter, curb ramp (220 miles);
Distress data collected will utilize the attributes shown within Task 4.2b
C-11
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-8
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
The City has initially identified specific displacement deficiency ranges which are demonstrated
below; any recommended changes to the distress rating limits will be discussed prior to survey:
• Rating 1 – (Fair), Locations that have a condition of Fair to Good or where the problem is
not a safety hazard
o Typically trip, separation, spalling,, raised/depressed slab distress areas that are
¼” to 1” in occurrence;
• Rating 2 – (Poor), Locations that have a condition of Poor or any location which the field
technician considers to be an immediate serious safety concern
o Typically trip, separation, spalling, raised/depressed slab distress areas that are
1” to 2” in occurrence;
• Rating 3 – (Very Poor), Locations that have a condition of Very Poor or where the field
technician determines that a problem is not an immediate safety concern
o Typically trip, separation, spalling, raised/depressed slab distress areas that are
2” or greater in occurrence;
• Rating 4– for “vicinity of a sensitive location” (i.e. schools, churches, hospitals, senior
housing, city facilities, parks, commercial centers, etc.) where pedestrian traffic is high
and the City has a vested interest in lowering tripping hazards.
o Rating can be given for any deficiency location; this places priority onto the
location needing repair due to the pedestrian activity at the site.
We welcome staff members from the City of RPV to join our surveys. Our use of mobile GPS
Handheld/Tablet units allows our staff to collect sidewalk data with the City of RPV’s database
live in the field. At the end of the day all electronic data is transferred to our office for quality
Sidewalk Priority
Distress Locations,
associated with
address and proper
side of street
C-12
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-9
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
control and management. We can produce Sidewalk GIS Distress locations at any time during
the survey for City QC and/or review.
Section Distress and Condition Reporting
At 50% and 100% Bucknam will generate Sidewalk / C&G / Curb Ramp Location/Distress Reports
for City staff review. The City and our staff will review these reports to ensure that all inventory
data is correct and the project is running smoothly.
Sidewalk spreadsheet reports and GIS maps will include:
• Identification of all street segments in a continuous manner (W to E and S to N);
• Sidewalk/C&G/Curb Ramp locations identified within street segments;
• GIS maps identifying sidewalk displacement locations;
• A Sidewalk M&R recommendation map
• Citywide Sidewalk/C&G/Curb Ramp Atlas Book
Deliverable: Citywide ROW Distress Reports (50% and 100% status reports); Recommended
repairs; GIS Distress/Deficiency maps.
REQUESTED ADDITIONAL ASSET DATA COLLECITON
TASK 4.2d: Pavement Marking, Medians, Guardrails, Signs Inventory
Per the City’s request, Bucknam has
been asked to digitize found pavement
markings, medians, guardrails and
roadway signs throughout the City.
This work will be performed in
conjunction with our PMP/Sidewalk
Inventory processes. By utilizing the
City’s high-resolution aerial imagery,
street-view technology resources,
automated roadway imaging
technology (see image right) and GIS
digitization to collect these street/ROW assets. Prior to survey all asset attribute
definitions/metrics will be submitted to the City for review and approval. General conditions
will be collected during our field inventories and our findings and recommendations will be
submitted as part of the Asset Management Report.
Bucknam will deliver unique pavement marking, median, guardrail and roadway sign layers in
ESRI GIS format and ensure that each layer is published within the City’s GIS Enterprise. General
quantity summary findings will be delivered as well as a citywide traffic control asset map book.
C-13
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-10
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
DEVELOP RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TASK 4.3: Maintenance & CIP/Budgetary Analysis
We will assist the City in developing the most cost-effective preventative maintenance, repair and
rehabilitation strategies possible. This will be accomplished by meeting with the City to discuss
and strategize maintenance activities that are currently being used by the City. Based on the
City’s current AC & PCC applications, Geotech reports and other maintenance practices used we
will conduct an historical and prospective analysis on the conditional and financial impact these
practices have on the pavement network.
We will establish/update the RPV MicroPAVER maintenance “decision tree” that will be used to
generate pavement recommendations that match current fiscal year maintenance
approaches/City practices. This will be accomplished by assessing/updating the unique and
individual PCI ranges and deterioration curves within PMP software based on functional class (i.e.
arterial, collector, local) and age. Our staff will review the RPV’s deterioration curves that have
been developed based on historical pavement condition, inspection, surface type, and road class.
All maintenance practices/unit costs will be integrated into the PMP and will be derived from the
most recent construction bids for pavement rehabilitation. We will account for inflation rates
when long-term revenues projections are made. Our Project Manager and Principal will work
closely with City in defining repair and rehabilitation strategies for each fiscal year as well as
establish PMP zones for the street/alley networks. Once the repair/rehabilitation strategies have
been defined, the identification of a five year Forecasted Maintenance schedule will be generated.
The recommended budget scenarios will be identified on the basis of several criteria:
• Assessment and review of the City’s Pavement CIP
• Present pavement conditions; Desired levels of service and available resources
• Projected / Forecasted PCI’s per section
• Cost benefit of individual strategies (minimum of three (3) scenarios)
• Scheduling with the City’s major CIP projects (water, sewer, etc.)
• Budgetary recommendations that satisfy METRO guidelines
• Local “Neighborhood” fiscal year reporting/improvement scheduling
• Future routine maintenance needs based on projected deterioration rates
The primary emphasis of this task is to maximize the scheduling of street maintenance using the
most cost-effective strategies available and taking into account a life-cycle cost analysis.
TASK 4.4: Asset Management / Pavement Management Reports
Pavement Management Report
We will deliver the Final Report to the City which will be essential for staff reference / use as
well as presented in a way that is beneficial for elected officials/upper management. This
report will assist the City in complying with METRO.
C-14Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-11
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
The report will be prepared in a format that uses the information delivered by the PMP
database in conjunction with the information and analysis performed by our team. The report
will provide the City with information on:
Current inventory and pavement conditions indices (PCI) for all road classes
Projected annual rehabilitation programs for street maintenance for a 8-yr period
(ARTERIAL, LOCAL and ALLEY Forecast Maintenance Reports) that show the largest
return on investment and acceptable levels of service;
Modeling and comparison of at least three (3) budget scenarios that typically include:
Comparison of citywide M&R approach to City’s traditional zone rotation schedule;
Future PMP conditions based upon historical funding levels;
Identification of annual funding to maintain current after 8-years;
Increase current PCI within 8-years;
Gradual, Frontloaded, Constrained and Unlimited funding analysis;
Strategies and recommendations for the City’s maintenance programs and
procedures, including a preventative maintenance schedule;
Publication of multiple budget scenarios within MyRoads™ (Bucknam web-
portal/dashboard);
Supporting documentation required by METRO;
A detailed breakdown of deferred maintenance (backlog); and
Quality Management Plan document.
Our recommendations will provide guidance to the City on how to implement better
preventative maintenance / rehabilitation strategies and/or increase funding through PMP data
examples. We will make a presentation of the results from the 2021 PMP update to City
personal and/or City Council if necessary-pro bono.
Asset Management Report
Additionally, the City has asked for the generation of a revised Asset Management Program
Report. This will be created and produced based on our findings and recommendations for the
assets described throughout of scope of work. Our efforts will include:
• Revised Asset Management Report and PMP Report after City comments
• Presentation of reports to the City leadership including preparation of materials
• Revised Asset Management Report and PMP Report after leadership comments
• Presentation of report, including development of Staff Report and presentation materials to Infrastructure Management Advisory Committee (IMAC)
• Revised Asset Management Report and PMP Report after IMAC comments
C-15Pl I
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-12
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
• Presentation of report to the City Council
• Revised Asset Management Report and PMP Report after CC comments
• Delivery of Final Asset Management Report and PMP Report (signed by Bucknam’s Civil Engineer (Mr. Steve Bucknam)
• Delivery of final GIS files for each asset class including final condition assessment
Registered Engineer
Mr. Steve Bucknam, P.E. will review all completed data and sign a final Asset Management and
PMP reports incorporating the results of our pavement evaluation and conditions. We will
provide recommendations for pavement rehabilitation and replacement design based upon
field data and analysis.
TASK 4.5: PMP Mapping and GIS Update
As an enhancement and proactive
approach to this project, our staff will
update and publish a Pavement-GIS
link between the PMP database and
the City’s GIS system. Bucknam will
utilize the City’s existing 2019 PMP-
GIS layer for updating all essential
data to the layer. By using the unique
segment ID’s within the PMP and the
City’s ESRI street shapefile ID’s, we
will verify a one-to-one match for
each pavement section in the GIS. All
pavement segmentation within the
PMP database will be mirrored within
the RPV GIS layer which will allow all
pavement data to be published on the GIS layer. With a completed survey and we will update
the PMP-GIS layer with all final PCI data.
The maps described below will be incorporated into the City’s Final PMP report:
• PCI values for every section; Work History identifications; 8-yr proposed Arterial /
Local Rehabilitation and Slurry Seal Programs; and Functional classification maps
Our staff will coordinate all project deliveries with the Public Works and the GIS division to
ensure that the most current and accurate PMP-GIS maps are represented within the City’s GIS
enterprise. Bucknam’s 2019 RPV PMP-GIS map shown above.
TASK 4.6: PMP / GIS Training
With PMP software use being one of the key components to a successful PMP implementation,
we will provide City staff with quality, certified training and the necessary skills needed to
C-16
,t,.,1,,1:
--1 .:;?«(, _,, .. ,;.; ... ,,, u i,u~ )::~·1: ~f,..,1
·~-i ,,,
... i ; . .. ,:
-----::-:--c ..
•. •$;•
Approach to Scope of Work
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1-13
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
maintain the PMP. Bucknam will provide City staff with all collected pavement/GIS data, as well
as updated operation manuals for both field data collection and software use.
TASK 4.7: RPV MyRoads™ PMP Web-Portal
RPV MyRoads™ Web-Portal – Bucknam’s
proprietary option of MyRoads™ is a great match
for the RPV PMP today and the future. This
option brings your PMP data to life within a
dynamic PMP dashboard!
Bucknam now provides all our PMP clients with a
unique and agency driven “MyRoads™” web-
portal that provides instantaneous access to
your pavement management database. This
“dashboard” allows users to toggle through
individual sections via GIS mapping selections,
zone queries, rank selection, PCI ranges, etc. to
review all section metrics, latest/previous
inspections, work histories generate filtered PCI
reports and identify potential maintenance costs
based upon your unique needs.
Bucknam has shown above the RPV MyRoads™
account actively working! This tool will be
accessed by City staff simply through a
Username/Password methodology. As changes are made to the RPV PMP database the
MyRoads™ dataset is changed to reflect work history edits, PCI inspections and section changes.
In summary, MyRoads™ allows the user perform the following dynamic functions:
• Query specific pavement segment(s) to view current/historic PCI, work history
inspection;
• Filter for pavement sections within a defined zone, PCI range and/or functional class;
• Select a pavement section or grouping of section through the on-board GIS tool;
• Enter slurry, overlay & reconstruction unit costs to determine preliminary cost of
maintenance and resulting citywide PCI
o Display critical street / sidewalk / ROW assets along pavement section(s) that
are critical to Engineering Bid development and solicitation (curb ramps,
utilities, manholes, trees, etc.
• Displays all final GIS project maps (PCI, work history, 8-yr forecasted maintenance, etc.)
• Bucknam will train RPV staff on the simply use of the MyRoads™ dashboard
C-17
•••
Organizations and Staffing
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2-1
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Firm Profile and Qualifications
With more than twenty years of managing change, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. (S-Corp)
is committed to building stronger relationships with government organizations through frequent
communication and team building. We build long-term partnerships with agencies that expect
and require accuracy, efficiency, and integrity in all aspects of community services. Our
experienced staff is committed to ensuring that immediate and long-term goals are met and are
a top priority in the development of pavement management, infrastructure management,
financial, geographic information systems (GIS), and facility management projects.
Our full-service Infrastructure Management - GIS Division provides comprehensive engineering
and infrastructure management services, as well as database management, pavement / ROW
field inspection services, and GIS automation and management. Our staff consists of registered
civil engineers; former Director of Public Works-City Engineers and maintenance specialists who
can help implement solutions based upon your specific facility/infrastructure needs and will
provide assistance through each step of your project.
Our extensive professional service offerings include:
Regarding Pavement Management Programs, our firm is currently assisting 45+ local agencies
comply with LA County and Orange County pavement reporting requirements.
Regarding Pavement Management Programs, our firm is currently assisting 45+ SoCal local
agencies comply with the County pavement reporting requirements. In addition to the
extensive knowledge and experience of our infrastructure management professionals, Bucknam
provides a broad scope of administrative, inspection, construction management, civil
engineering, and GIS services to public agencies. The extensive experience of Bucknam’s staff,
coupled PMP service to more than 100 cities and other public agencies, assures our clients that
the firm is a broad based resource with an understanding of today’s infrastructure issues and
knows how to provide the necessary solutions to public agencies in today's complex
governmental environment.
We bring a wealth of experience to the City through our successful track record, pavement
management knowledge through application, and relationship building through trust and
adherence to schedule. We look forward to working with you on your project. Our handpicked
management professionals are committed to delivering quality services to the City. Our office
are located in Oceanside, CA 3548 Seagate Way, Suite 230 (12 employees).
C-18
.. Pavement-CIPManagement.(PMP} ............ ; ..... . ... PublicWorks.Management ..... .
........................... Pavement .Data . Con version .......................... L .. ADA . Sel f -Evaluation/Tra nsition. Planning .... .
Pavement Con di tior:i .. ?..1:1.r:"..E:!.Y..~ ;.. . . GASS 34 Compliance/Repc:>.r::t.i,:ig
........................ PMP .Assessments./.software ....................... L. ..................... 1ntranet .G1s .. 1mplementation ....................... .
................................... PM P /G IS. De l ive rabl es ................................. L ................................ i:=.C?.r:i.!.r.~~ ~1.?. .. ?.E:!.r:".iEE:!~ ................................. .
.. ArcG IS On lit:iE:!.>.\PPS / Tooll:lE:!.Y,.E:!l<:lprnent Ir.attic Contr<:l .1(>.E:?v ice / Si~,:i lr:i:V..E:!r:1.!<:l ry ..
Pub Ii c .. ~.!.&.~!:.<:l.!:.Way lnvE:!.r:1.!9.:._ie_s ____ .. Ma i ntenance. Management .P rogra ms ......... ..
.. PMP OCT A.-. Comp l iance. Reporting ........... ~E:!.~ord ~E:!!.E:!t:itior:,J?..~anni.r:1&.Ser:"..i.ces
Digital Road w ay Imaging/ Survey Uti lity GIS Service s
Organizations and Staffing
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2-2
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Delineation Narrative of Bucknam Infrastructure Group’s Strengths
As Bucknam approaches twenty-three (23) years of pavement management experience, our firm
is distinct and unique in the fact that we have continued to improve upon our long-term local
agency client based throughout Los Angeles County. Building and establishing long-term client
relationships through PMP management is a clear delineation of our professional services.
Bucknam’s experience and qualifications directly related to this project and other key
delineation strengths include:
• Performed RPV’s PMP and Sidewalk
projects in 2013, 2016 and 2019;
• Established RPV’s sidewalk GIS layer
and inspections in 2019;
• Working with 27 of the 88 Los
Angeles County local agencies in the
past two years (31%);
• Working with 17 of the 35 Orange
County local agencies in the past two
years (50%);
• Staff / Firm is certified through OCTA
and MTC for use and management of
MicroPAVER;
• Bucknam now implements Fuscoe’s
Cloud-based Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Learning Technology to calculate all pavement section AC/PCC SF quantities;
o This will quantify all PMP section AC / PCC square footages for the network that
will greatly increase the accuracy of survey and cost reporting;
• Focused managers / field technicians that perform infrastructure management services
at cost-competitive rates and deliver quality products;
• Local presence (Oceanside office) allows our firm to be on-site to respond RPV requests
and needs;
• Incorporation of MyRoads™ – PMP/ROW mapping (web-based access/use); requires no
GIS software to view your PMP/ROW assets online (See Task 4.7 within Scope of Work);
• Proven economic ROI regarding long-term Pavement CIP’s recommendations, clients,
implementation, maintenance applications and increased PCI’s; for example:
o 13 years with Culver City (PCI increase from 59 to 71);
o 20 years with Huntington Beach (PCI increase from 63 to 79);
o 22 years with Ontario (PCI increase from 62 to 83);
o 10 years with Costa Mesa (PCI increase from 73 to 85);
C-19
Organizations and Staffing
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2-3
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Roadway Asset Services, LLC (RAS) is a registered Texas Engineering Firm
(F22104) headquartered in Austin, Texas and its key members have been
evaluating pavement conditions and developing maintenance management
plans for 30 years. The RAS executive team members have over 55 years combined experience
in pavement management and ROW asset inventory collection and condition assessment. In
the last 5 years the RAS team members have managed over 100,000 miles of ROW asset
inventory data and pavement condition surveys. RAS team members have managed,
provided field data collection, performed QA/QC, developed pavement management plans,
collected ROW asset inventories and recommended pavement management and asset
management software on numerous similar projects to the scope of services requested by the
City of Rancho Palos Verdes. RAS is a financially secure limited liability company, and we are
committed to our continued financial growth. RAS practices strong internal controls and
conservative business practices. RAS offers comprehensive experience and subject matter
expertise in the fields of engineering, surveying, asset management, transportation planning
and GIS.
RAS operates automated data collection vehicles manufactured and configured by
International Cybernetics Corporation (ICC) with 360 viewing and latest pavement sensors for
meeting or exceeding data deliverable timelines. Furthermore, the RAS Roadway Asset
Collection (RAC) vehicle has received independent inertial profiler certification for accuracy
and repeatability from the National Center for Asphalt Technology at Auburn University, as
well as ASTM E-950 certification.
Key members of the RAS team have managed projects that have provided ROW inventory data
collection or pavement evaluation surveys for numerous municipalities including: Austin, TX;
Albuquerque, NM; Salt Lake City, UT; Durham, NC; Denver, CO; Pueblo, CO; Greenville, SC;
Montgomery County, TN; Bellaire, TX and Seguin, TX.
C-20
~#S ot Soe.!cco
Staff Qualifications and Experience
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 3-1
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Project Team – Key Staff
The Bucknam pavement management team’s local agency expertise is demonstrated through:
Our experience of managing pavement projects over the past twenty (20) years;
Assisting cities comply with County PMP Propositions/Measures
Implementing MicroPAVER throughout Southern California
Extensive Los Angeles, Riverside, Orange, San Diego and Inland Empire PMP project
management experience;
Our understanding of public works projects from the “city/agency” side through City
Engineer and Public Works Director experience;
Implementing a realistic, proactive and sustainable PMP methodology that matches
your agencies needs and goals.
Bucknam will bring our extensive experience to the RPV by
building upon our knowledge and understanding of your PMP
goals. Mr. Bucknam’s pavement team includes ten (10)
dedicated, qualified managers and field technicians that have
served under his management for over twenty years on PMP
projects. His team of inspectors will update your PMP through
sound Army Corps of Engineers – MicroPAVER inspection methodologies. Mr. Bucknam’s
experience covers the management and implementation of infrastructure management
programs that exceeds 55,850 miles of pavement for more than 75 cities and 500+ PMP
projects.
Bucknam – Key Project Team / Experience
PETER BUCKNAM, Project Manager, has managed numerous pavement management
projects over the past 22 years in the Southern California region and will be the Project Manager
for RPV’s PMP project. Within this time he has served as project manager for seventy agencies
in the Southern California. Peter is committed to the project from the receipt of the notice-to-
proceed through completion and furthermore he is a PMS software trainer on
MicroPAVER/StreetSaver and performed numerous training sessions for local agencies. He has
performed over 50 training workshops covering software’s such as MicroPAVER, StreetSaver
and CarteGraph.
Our niche team of PMP experts allows our Project Manager and staff to survey the network in
six (6) weeks and deliver the Final PMP Report prior to the Agency’s deadline. He brings his
expertise to cities through converting, implementing, updating, and enhancing pavement
management programs; this covers 20+ years (12 with Bucknam Infrastructure Group, 5 with
Bucknam & Associates and 5 with Berryman and Henigar).
Mr. Bucknam will continue to bring new, fresh and proactive recommendations to this project
and will identify realistic program management and fiscal goals to assist the Agency in its
upcoming CIP. RPV will continue to receive recommendations that are sound and achievable,
rather than timid or unrealistic.
No key person designated to
this project will be removed
or replaced w/o prior
written consent from the
Agency
C-21
Staff Qualifications and Experience
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 3-2
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
STEVE BUCKNAM, P.E., Principal, will be responsible for the overall performance of the
project and provide quality assurance review. Mr. Steve Bucknam is a licensed Civil Engineer
(LIC #20903) and will oversee all tasks for this project. Mr. Bucknam is a former Deputy City
Manager for Public Works and City Engineer of Norwalk, and City Engineer in Arcadia and
Pacifica, California. He has over 45 years of professional experience and has managed street
maintenance, reconstruction and improvement programs.
AARON SUTTON, GIS Manager, will oversee all GIS and PMS data migration prior and during
the project. He drives all GIS creation, PMS mapping, editing and deliverables for the project
and is our key staffer for the ArcGIS Online web-hosting services that we provide. Mr. Sutton
has been involved with over 55 pavement management projects within San Bernardino,
Riverside, LA, San Diego and Orange counties.
SHAUN RUSSO, Lead Field Technician, will be the lead field surveyor for this project. His
responsibilities will include surveying, quality control, and working with our management staff
ensuring the updated PMP database is complete. He has been involved with over 62 pavement
management projects and brings his wealth of PMP software, GIS and inspection experience to
this project. Shaun is a certified ASTM D6433-20 inspector.
TIM FENNESSY, Field Technician, will be a supportive field surveyor for this project. His
responsibilities will include surveying, quality control, and working with our management staff
ensuring the updated PMP database is complete. He has been involved with over 35 pavement
management projects and brings his wealth of PMP software, GIS and inspection experience to
this project. Tim is a certified ASTM D6433-20 inspector.
AARON COHODAS, Field Technician, will be a supportive field surveyor for this project. His
responsibilities will include surveying, quality control, and working with our management staff
ensuring the updated PMP database is complete. Mr. Cohodas has been involved with over 21
pavement management projects and brings his wealth of PMP software, GIS and inspection
experience to this project. Aaron is a certified ASTM D6433-20 inspector.
With three technicians on this project that are trained in the Army Corps of Engineers survey
methodology and available to begin work immediately; our survey schedule will be expedited.
Our team will be able to survey the entire 150 miles of pavement/sidewalk within eight (8)
weeks’ time due to our familiarity with the RPV PMP network/area, experience, availability
and man-power.
Relevant PMP Project Experience
The following project experience presents our description of work, its relevance in completing
similar projects for numerous other agencies, Prop. A & C, METRO compliance, OCTA Measure
M & M2 PMP experience, PMP software training expertise, and the broad knowledge of our
pavement project team. Our project team brings over 75 years of public/private engineering
and data management experience to the South Pasadena.
C-22
Staff Qualifications and Experience
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 3-3
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
This includes over 500+ PMP projects covering turn-key projects, simply training of Agency staff
with pavement management methods, County Measure/Proposition compliancy, financial
strategies and Capital Improvement Programs.
Over the past twenty-three years, we have worked on numerous projects similar to RPV’s
current PMP project. We have listed five (5) similar “long-term” pavement management
projects that cover the same task descriptions as listed in your RFQ:
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
Pavement Management Program-GIS, City of Monterey Park (2015-22)
Mr. Frank Lopez, Public Works Director/City Engineer - (626) 307-1323; 320 West Newmark
Ave., Monterey Park, CA 91754 (flopez@montereypark.ca.gov)
Since 2015 Bucknam has been contracted to
perform a citywide pavement management
inventories for the City of Monterey Park. Our
initial project consisted of a complete turn-key
effort in “re-segmenting” the City’s PMP network,
converting previous PCI inspection data,
performing an ASTM D6433-18 based survey,
conversion and implementation of StreetSaver
and PMP-GIS integration. Additionally, our
services included a complete evaluation of the
City’s PMP budget, short-term and long-term
budgetary analysis (Actual, Maintain and
Recommended budgets) and GIS services that linked the City’s StreetSaver database to the
City’s GIS enterprise. Since the project completed Bucknam has provided annual PMP support
services to the City. Bucknam was recently selected in 2022 to perform another citywide PMP
update.
Citywide Pavement
Management Program-GIS, City
of Duarte (2018-2021)
Mrs. Amanda Hamilton, Public Works
Manager - (626) 357-7931 ext. 233; 1600
Huntington Dr., Duarte, CA 91010
(ahamilton@accessduarte.com)
Since 2018 Bucknam has been contracted
to perform a citywide infrastructure
management inventories for the City of
Duarte.
C-23
--11
:;~ i .
,I ; ;
'-· .,,,.,.,..~
• -.: c.i.~~-
~ =;'~~~-~~~.. , Ji::~~i?~::; : ; r~.
4
~
4
•
,~
~llll'
"::11~ .... 0""
-~.,.n..,.,,,,>--.~
-7~ ~:,C-w!,
-,;,,;1,\,)-\>.J :.".";o .,,;,..,, ..
i ~ t\...~ •.• '•···· _41-, ;,:17;
. : ~ ·L
/
Git,,•,:if 0 1.1art-9
C uu ..-111 PCI 2J2'J
iJ
.,
Staff Qualifications and Experience
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 3-4
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Our initial project consisted of a complete turn-key effort in “re-segmenting” the City’s
pavement management network, converting previous PCI inspection data, performing an ASTM
D6433-18 based survey, implementation of MicroPAVER and PMP-GIS integration. Additionally,
our services included a complete evaluation of the City’s PMP budget, short-term and long-term
budgetary analysis (Actual, Maintain and Recommended budgets) and GIS services that linked
the City’s MicroPAVER database to the City’s GIS enterprise. Since the project completed
Bucknam has provided annual GIS support services to the City.
Citywide Pavement Management Program – GIS, City of Covina (2019)
Mr. Rafael Fajardo, City Engineer - (626) 384-5489; 125 East College Street, Covina, CA 91723-
2199 rfajardo@covinaca.gov
During the summer of 2019, Bucknam
was contracted to perform a citywide
pavement management inventory for the
City of Covina. This project consists of a
complete turn-key effort in “re-
segmenting” the City’s PMP network,
converting previous PCI inspection data,
performing an ASTM D6433-18 based
survey, implementation of MicroPAVER
and PMP-GIS integration. Under this
initial project, Bucknam developed a
citywide forecast maintenance report to
determine what level of funding is
necessary to maintain today’s conditions.
Another critical deliverable was the PMP-GIS layer and MyRoads application which allowed staff
to review the study findings as well as develop preliminary PS&E projects/schedules.
Citywide Pavement Management Program–
GIS, City of Norwalk (2013-21)
Mr. Glen Kau, Director of Public Services - (562) 929-5700;
12700 Norwalk Boulevard, Norwalk, CA 90650
gkau@norwalkca.gov
Bucknam was recently selected in 2020 to perform another
citywide PMP update. Historically, In 2013, Bucknam was
contracted to perform a citywide pavement management
inventory for the City of Norwalk.
C-24
,._ .. !
''•~--
C(tl,' of CO'..-ln,,, CA
A YNll)('Jlt O'IINl',l'lt'HI J\?1!1
-.. ··------
! ,,._ '•~
_,_, .. ,, ... ~ ..
"''''''
-~· «•~·-··1· !!.: . --~~-
City of \o.·w:i!k
~m-er : r c 1 201 0
Staff Qualifications and Experience
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 3-5
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
This project consisted off a complete turn-key effort in “re-segmenting” the City’s PMP network,
converting previous PCI inspection data, performing an ASTM D6433 based survey,
implementation of MicroPAVER, complete evaluation of the City’s PMP budget, short-term and
long-term budgetary analysis (Actual, Maintain and Recommended budgets) and GIS
integration.
Citywide Pavement Management Program – GIS, City of Rancho Palos
Verdes (2013-2019)
Mr. Charles Eder, Senior Engineer – (310) 544-5282; 30940 Hawthorne Avenue, Rancho Palos
Verdes, 90275 charlese@rpvca.gov
Since 2013 Bucknam has been contracted to
perform a citywide pavement management
inventories for the City of RPV. Our initial project
consisted of a complete turn-key effort in “re-
segmenting” the City’s PMP network, validating
previous PCI inspection data, performing an ASTM
D6433-18 based surveys and PMP-GIS integration.
Additionally, our services included a complete
evaluation of the City’s PMP budget, short-term
and long-term budgetary analysis, zone
maintenance recommendations (Actual, Maintain
and Recommended budgets) and GIS services that
linked the City’s MicroPAVER database to the City’s GIS enterprise. Since the project completed
Bucknam has provided triennial PMP support services to the City. Bucknam was recently
selected in 2019 to perform another citywide PMP and Sidewalk update.
C-25
Staff Qualifications and Experience
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 3-6
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Time Period of Project
2021-2022
2012-2017
Completion
Each Cycle completed on time and within
budget
Project Budget
$2,841,146- 2021-2022-RAS
$2,886,903-2012-2017-DTS
Responsibilities
-Pavement Evaluation -PCI Calculation
-IRI Measurement -GIS Segmentation
-Review Soil Conditions -Video Viewer
-Deterioration Curves -PMS Implement
-System Training -ROW Assets
Client Name and Contact
City of Albuquerque, Doug Rizor
Systems Programmer I - Department of
Municipal Development
505-366-4020, drizor@cabq.gov
RAS Role
Key Members work at RAS and previously
at DTS
RAS Team Members
Scot Gordon, Project Manager
Bart Williamson, Assistant Project Manager
Rafael Rivera, Data Collection Manager
Sandra Marrero, Pavement Engineer
Sub-Consultant Experience
The following projects provide details on the projects listed in team member resumes,
demonstrate the experience of our proposed team members on similar projects and our
capability to successfully complete projects for the City of RPV.
City of Albuquerque, New Mexico – Pavement Condition Surveys and ROW Asset Inventory
RAS is currently
completing a
pavement condition
survey for the City’s
4,548 lane mile network of City maintained
roadways and alleys. RAS is completing the
survey using its fleet of RAC vehicles. The
pavement condition survey is being completed
in accordance with the ASTM D6433.
Additionally, RAS is completing an extensive
ROW inventory and condition assessment of
the following assets for the City: traffic signs,
pavement markings, pavement striping,
sidewalks, ADA ramps, bike lanes, curb and
gutter, guardrail, streetscapes, street trees,
traffic calming devices, polygon mapping,
control boxes, backflows, and electrical/water
meters. All GIS based deliverables will be
imported into the City’s asset management
software.
Key members of the RAS team, while at Data
Transfer Solutions (DTS), worked with the City
of Albuquerque completing a traffic sign
inventory and assessment for the City of
Albuquerque’s 4,548 lane mile network on
time and within budget. The project consisted
of collecting a field survey of every sign and
traffic signal in the City.
Automated data collection vehicles were
utilized to capture images for use in asset
extraction. The project provided efficient and
cost-effective data extraction in a GIS
environment that was seamlessly integrated
into the City’s VUEWorks asset management
software system and deployed throughout the City to proactively manage its asset
infrastructure. The inventory consisted of the following assets which were collected and rated
89,089 traffic signs, 29,179 curb markings, 1,631 decorative street lights, 620 neon signs,
C-26
~s
Roodwlly Assot setvlces
Staff Qualifications and Experience
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 3-7
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Time Period of Project
2021
2017-18
Project Budget
$190,975-2021-RAS
$157,400-2017-18 While at DTS
Responsibilities
-Pavement Evaluation -PCI Calculation
-IRI Measurement -GIS Segmentation
-Deterioration Curves -Cartegraph
Client Name and Contact
Salt Lake City
Brad Zaba
GIS Manager
801-535-6371
Brad.zaba@slcgov.com
2001 S State Street N3-600
Salt Lake City, UT 84190
RAS Role
Key Members work at RAS and previously at
DTS
RAS Team Members
Scot Gordon, Project Engineer
Bart Williamson, Client Manager
Rafael Rivera, Data Collection Manager
16,879 pavement markings, 47,200 pavement striping, 3,277 crosswalks and 292 school zone
signs. The second data collection project included a City-wide automated data collection effort
focused on ROW assets including: bike hazards, pavement markings, pavement striping,
sidewalks, ADA ramps, sidewalk obstructions, curb and gutter, guardrail, meter boxes,
backflow enclosures, control boxes, street trees and public ROW mapping. Additionally, a
pavement condition survey was completed per the ASTM D6433 methodology and the results
managed in VUEWorks pavement management software.
City of Salt Lake City, Utah – Pavement Condition Survey
RAS is performing the 2021 pavement
condition survey for the City of Salt Lake City’s
750 test mile network. RAS is completing the
survey using its fleet of RAC vehicles. The
pavement condition survey is being
completed in accordance with the ASTM
D6433. RAS will be providing GIS based
deliverables and importing the data into
Cartegraph. RAS is performing a pilot study,
provide a final report and will assist the City in
presenting data to City Council regarding
various funding amounts and how they can
improve the City’s PCI and its level of service
to the general public. RAS is also completing
a pilot study utilizing mobile LiDAR to assess
two corridors within the City.
The key members of the RAS team, while at
Data Transfer Solutions (DTS), completed the
2017-18 pavement condition survey on the
City maintained roadways. The data collection
vehicles images and pavement data collected
were defined in the data element delivery
structure utilized by Salt Lake City for
consumption into Cartegraph OMS and GIS.
The survey was conducted in accordance with
the specifications and methodologies
described by ASTM D6433-11. Mr. Rivera
successfully imported the collected data into
the City’s Cartegraph OMS pavement
management database. At the conclusion of
the project, Mr. Gordon oversaw the preparation of a final report which included costs and
budget scenarios to improve the condition of the City’s street network within the defined
budget.
C-27
Staff Qualifications and Experience
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 3-8
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Prior to the start of the data collection, Mr. Rivera worked with the City’s GIS staff to identify the
appropriate mileage for collection and reviewed the GIS segmentation provided in the City
database. Appropriate segmentation was laid out based on a crossroad-to-crossroad section
divider. A 10-mile pilot plan was laid out for early collection to provide an example of
deliverables and to validate the accuracy of the collection and assessment.
The evaluation project also included a technical report presenting the predominate distresses
and statistical analysis of the condition results and repair recommendations. The report
provided results based upon surface type and division of functional classification for all
roadways. The results presented in the database and report were used to develop a more cost-
effective approach to maintenance, improving the City’s preservation techniques and
optimizing how the City chooses to spend maintenance funds.
Team Resumes can be found on the following pages:
C-28
Peter J. Bucknam / Project Manager
Director of Infrastructure Management – GIS
EDUCATION
B.A., Geography – Urban Planning, San Diego State University, 1997
PROFESSIONAL DATA
Member, American Public Works Association
Member, Maintenance Superintendents Association
Chair, Transportation Committee, Inland Empire Report Card (ASCE) – 2005/06 & 2008/09
Co-Chair, Member APWA Committee for Street and Technology 2003-2015
Certificate of Professional Development – ASTM D6433-18; MicroPAVER
Certificate of Completion – OCTA MicroPAVER / StreetSaver Distress Training (2011 thru 2022)
NASSCO – Certificate, National Pipeline Assessment Certification Program (PACP)
QUALIFICATIONS / EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW
Peter Bucknam is an expert in infrastructure project management, pavement management-training, planning,
resource management, implementation and program management. He has over twenty years’ experience in
the area of Geographic Information Systems and infrastructure asset management. Mr. Bucknam has
managed a wide range of infrastructure project tasks including the collection and input of infrastructure
survey data, preparation of Public Works capital improvement program projections and reports,
infrastructure/software needs assessments, GIS/GPS data collection, data conversion and quality control.
Mr. Bucknam has performed infrastructure management services to over 70+ local agencies and is currently
serving as project manager for numerous pavement management programs throughout Southern California.
He has personally served as project manager for 300+ PMP projects throughout Riverside, San Bernardino,
San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles counties. He has worked with over 10, Inland Empire County cities, 25 Los
Angeles cities and he is currently working with 15 of the 34 Orange County agencies regarding Measure M2
MicroPAVER/StreetSaver compliance.
His project level and management experience covers: pavement/sidewalk management, Traffic Control
Device Inventories (TCDI), GIS implementation, Traffic Signal surveys, Right-of-Way (ROW) surveys, and ADA
survey/compliance. In managing over 200 infrastructure projects in the past sixteen years, Mr. Bucknam has
used a diverse amount of software to assist local agencies implement infrastructure management programs
and GASB 34. These programs include MicroPAVER, MTC StreetSaver, LambdaTech’s GPSVision, CartéGraph,
ESRI products, Crossroads, Lucity, Energov, Spillman, GBA Master Series, and MapInfo.
Prior to joining Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc., Mr. Bucknam served as Director of Infrastructure
Management-GIS with an Engineering consulting firm where he managed numerous public works
infrastructure/ROW projects ranging from surveying, maintenance life-cycles, cost & benefit analysis,
financing and construction cost estimating. This included researching, surveying, converting and
implementing multiple phase pavement management projects which provided better management practices,
data efficiencies and GIS functionality within local governments and maintenance facilities. In addition, he
provided technical (software) support for the on-going citywide PMS projects as well as developing capital
improvement plans/budgets for integrating Tablet-GIS data management functionality into future
maintenance efforts.
C-29
SAMPLE OF PETER BUCKNAM’S PROJECT MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE (1997-2021)
• 2021 OCTA Pavement Management Plan (10 Year Study - OCTA
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Lake Elsinore
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Bellflower
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Indian Wells
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Solana Beach
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Barstow
• 2021 Sign Inventory Program, City of Norwalk
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of San Juan Capistrano
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of La Habra
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Gardena
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Menifee
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Duarte
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Pomona
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Covina
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Redlands
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Lomita
• 2020 Sign / Pavement Management Programs, City of National City
• 2020 Sign / Pavement Management Programs, City of Murrieta
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Brea
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Tustin
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Compton
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, La Cresta HOA, Temecula
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Glendora
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of La Palma
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Laguna Beach
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Sierra Madre
• 2020 Sidewalk / Pavement Management Programs, City of Lynwood
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Alhambra
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, Inland Empire Utilities Agency
• 2020-25 Pavement Management Program, City of Orange
• 2020-23 Pavement Management Program, City of Fullerton
• 2020-25 Pavement Management Program, City of Ontario
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Huntington Beach
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of La Verne
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Monrovia
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Norwalk
• 2020 Sign Inventory Program, City of Aliso Viejo
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of South Pasadena
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Westminster
• 2019 Pavement Management Program, City of Rialto
• 2019 Pavement Management Program, City of Palmdale
• 2019 Pavement Management Program, City of El Segundo
• 2019 Citywide GIS Operation & Maint. Services, City of Duarte
• 2019 Citywide GIS Operation & Maint. Services, City of Paso Robles
• 2019 Pavement Management Program, City of Fountain Valley
C-30
1
C. Stephen Bucknam, Jr., P.E., Principal-in-Charge
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering, Loyola University of Los Angeles, 1967
M.S., Environmental Engineering, Loyola University of Los Angeles, 1972
PROFESSIONAL DATA
Registered Professional Engineer, States of California (No.20903) and Washington (No.17310)
California State Community College Teaching Credential
Fellow, American Society of Civil Engineers
Former, City Engineer, Deputy City Manager, City of Norwalk
Member, Board of Directors – Urban Water Institute
Life Member, American Public Works Association
Member, Water Environment Foundation
Member, University of California Irvine, Civil & Environmental Engineering Affiliates
Honorary Member, Chi Epsilon
EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW
Over forty years’ experience in the administration, management, planning, design and construction
management of public works and development programs and projects including: water and wastewater
projects, pavement management programs, transportation, drainage, including: program management, master
planning, infrastructure planning and maintenance programming, environmental studies, street, highway, alley,
storm drain, water and sewer system design, rate studies, emergency planning, facilities design, groundwater
studies, wells, reservoirs, site studies, pump stations, lift stations, intergovernmental negotiations and
agreements, hydrology, treatment facilities, building design, grants, regulatory permitting, system appraisals,
R/W negotiations, acquisitions and documentation, project management, production control, operations
studies, capital improvement programming and budgeting, hydroelectric projects, underground utilities,
assessment districts, surveying, mapping, legal testimony to public boards, commissions and councils, and
direction of technical advisory committees to joint powers agencies and water districts.
Transportation / Streets – Highways - Traffic
Served as Contract City Engineer for the City of Arcadia responsible for long range advanced planning of the
City’s transportation engineering program. Directed the preparation of the City’s Transportation Master Plan
which identified, consistent with the City’s General Plan the transportation related needs under these
requirements so of AB 1600 nexus constraints.
Acted as Principal in charge over a Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1)/Newport Boulevard (SR-55) interchange, City
of Newport Beach. Project involves a study of various alternatives, conventional and unconventional, for
improvements to the existing interchange.
Restraints include limited right-of-way, environmental challenges (e.g., Newport channel bridge widening,
"Arches" liquor store and restaurant property acquisition, and existing bridge aesthetics), and potential
hazardous waste issues. Alternatives were evaluated and selected to include in the PSR. Included project
coordination with various agencies and sub consultants, and oversight of concept geometries, cost estimating,
and report preparation.
C-31
2
Conceptual study, Project Study Report, and Project Report for I-710/Firestone Boulevard interchange
modification and Firestone Boulevard improvements for City of South Gate. Also involved a feasibility study
which included preparation of a traffic study, conceptual plans for several types of interchanges, construction
cost estimates, and preliminary Caltrans Project Study Report. Prepared ISTEA National Highway System
funding application for authorization and appropriation. Coordination with Caltrans District 7.
Mr. Bucknam has served as the working Principal / Civil Engineer for all pavement management related projects
that Bucknam has performed. This includes projects listed below:
• 2021 OCTA Pavement Management Plan (10 Year Study - OCTA
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Lake Elsinore
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Bellflower
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Indian Wells
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Solana Beach
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of Barstow
• 2021 Sign Inventory Program, City of Norwalk
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of San Juan Capistrano
• 2021 Pavement Management Program, City of La Habra
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Gardena
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Menifee
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Duarte
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Lomita
• 2020 Sign / Pavement Management Programs, City of National City
• 2020 Sign / Pavement Management Programs, City of Murrieta
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Brea
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Tustin
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Compton
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, La Cresta HOA, Temecula
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Glendora
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of La Palma
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Laguna Beach
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Sierra Madre
• 2020 Sidewalk / Pavement Management Programs, City of Lynwood
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Alhambra
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Orange
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Fullerton
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Ontario
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Huntington Beach
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of La Verne
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, Inland Empire Utilities Agency
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Monrovia
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Norwalk
• 2020 Sign Inventory Program, City of Aliso Viejo
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of South Pasadena
• 2020 Pavement Management Program, City of Westminster
• 2019 Pavement Management Program, City of Rialto
• 2019 Pavement Management Program, City of Palmdale
C-32
G. SCOT GORDON, PE, IAM
ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER
Mr. Gordon serves as President and Lead Pavement Engineer at
Roadway Asset Services. Mr. Gordon has 30 years of experience in asset
management, transportation engineering, geotechnical engineering,
and construction materials testing including pavement design and
optimization for transportation networks. As a professional engineer, he
has managed numerous projects such as design/build highway projects,
airfield pavement and other government projects. He is an expert in the
design, evaluation, monitoring, and research of pavement as well as
pavement rehabilitation and soil stabilization. Scot has completed
numerous projects related to pavement management system
implementation, pavement condition surveys, sign management
surveys, sidewalk condition surveys, and road assessment utilizing
LiDAR. The following is a brief list of projects he has managed.
KEY PROJECTS
Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) – Pavement
Data Collection and Pilot Pavement Management Program
The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) is the region’s
official comprehensive planning organization for seven counties and 284
communities of northeastern Illinois. Mr. Gordon served as the Project
Manager for the project designed to collect data and assess the
pavement condition for 5,153 miles of roadway for all federal-aid local
jurisdiction roads in the CMAP region. Mr. Gordon also served as the Sr.
Pavement Engineer, providing pavement data collection and condition
rating, as well as ROW data collection. All data was formatted to meet
the “National Performance Management Measures for Assessing
Pavement Condition,” 23 CFR 490 Subpart C, including International
Roughness Index (IRI), rutting, cracking, and faulting. Pavement
Condition Index (PCI) was calculated per the ASTM D6433-11 Standard
Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys.
Mr. Gordon provided field validation with the CMAP staff to ensure the
accuracy of the pavement survey results.
City of Indianapolis, Indiana – Pavement Management Services
Mr. Gordon served as the Project Manager and Sr. Pavement Engineer
for the City of Indianapolis in delivery of a pavement assessment for the
City’s 4,394 test miles of roadway. The pavement condition survey
included a set of pre-defined parameters to develop both a segment and
network level index (number) that correlates to existing pavement
surface conditions. This project used the ASTM D6433-11 pavement
condition analysis method to determine the road segment and network
PCI. As the Sr. Pavement Engineer, Mr. Gordon provided field validation
with the City staff to ensure the accuracy of the pavement survey
results. Mr. Gordon also worked with the City to evaluate the budget
needs of the arterial network to submit to IDOT for additional
maintenance funding using PAVER software. The City also collected and
rated ROW assets including sidewalks and ADA ramps.
FIRM
Roadway Asset Services
EXPERIENCE
30 years
EDUCATION
M.E., Civil Engineering, Texas
A&M University, 1990
B.S., Civil Engineering, Texas
A&M University, 1989
REGISTRATIONS
--CO Professional Engineer,
Certificate Number:30239
TX Professional Engineer,
Certificate Number:88099
-MD Professional Engineer,
Certificate Number:33493
-FL Professional Engineer,
Certificate Number:83979
-NC Professional Engineer,
Certificate Number:46459
-NM Professional Engineer,
Certificate Number:26330
-GA Professional Engineer,
Certificate Number:45916
-Institute of Asset Management
Certified
Professional Affiliations
-American Council of
Engineering Companies
-Tarrant County Board of
Directors, 2015-present
-American Society of Highway
Engineers, DFW Section
Treasurer, 2015-2017
-American Council of
Engineering Companies,
Colorado
Board of Directors, 2000-2001
-Charles County Chamber of
Commerce, Board of Directors,
2009-2010
C-33
~
Roadway Asset Services
'I I>
G. Scot Gordon, PE, IAM – Assistant Project Manager
2
City of Albuquerque, New Mexico – Pavement Condition Survey and Asset Inventory
in the Public ROW
Mr. Gordon is serving as the Project Manager for this mobile image data collection project for
the City’s 4,548-mile network. The project consists of collecting a field survey of the pavement
condition for the City’s network as well as a ROW asset inventory for several assets including
traffic signs, guardrail, sidewalks, ADA ramps, sidewalk obstructions, pavement markings,
pavement striping, medians, bike lanes and driveways. RAS is using its fleet of RAC vehicles
to complete the pavement condition survey. Scot is performing a pilot and field QA/QC during
the duration of the project. The pavement condition is being performed in accordance with
the ASTM D6433.
Montgomery County, Tennessee-Pavement Condition Survey
Mr. Gordon is the Project Manager for the Montgomery County Highway Department’s
pavement condition survey of the County’s 750 centerline miles of roadway. RAS is
completing the survey in accordance with the ASTM D6433 utilizing its fleet of RAC vehicles
to collect the pavement condition data and ROW images. RAS is working with the County to
provide a baseline PCI for the County to begin its pavement preservation. Additionally, the
pavement condition index data is being integrated and imported into the County’s newly
selected pavement management software, Streetlogix.
City of San Antonio, Texas – Pavement Management Services
Mr. Gordon was the Project Manager/Pavement Engineer for the City project, which consisted
of collecting right-of-way assets and pavement condition surveys. The team provided efficient
and cost-effective data extraction in a GIS environment that was seamlessly integrated into
the City’s Cartegraph asset management system and deployed throughout the City to
proactively manage its asset infrastructure. This project included mobile data collection of the
City’s 4,100 centerline mile network. Mr. Gordon worked with the City to optimize it’s
pavement preservation plans among 10 City Council Districts focusing on bringing each
district to a baseline minimum of a PCI of 70.
City of Durham, North Carolina-Pavement Condition Survey 2021
Mr. Gordon served as the Project Manager/Pavement Engineer for this project which included
automated data collection for pavement condition surveys per the ASTM D6433, budget
analysis and maintenance optimization for the City’s approximately 700-mile pavement
network. The scope of service included complete roadway pavement data collection with
images and video, perform pavement condition rating and assessment, develop pavement
management repair recommendations and reports. Mr. Gordon worked with the City on the
PCI results, and interpretation of these in addition to preparing and presenting results to the
City Council for budget planning. The project also includes a traffic sign inventory
City of Salt Lake City, Utah-Pavement Condition Survey 2021
RAS is performing the 2021 pavement condition survey for the City of Salt Lake City’s 730
test mile network. RAS is completing the survey using its fleet of RAC vehicles. The pavement
condition survey is being completed in accordance with the ASTM D6433. RAS will be providing
GIS based deliverables and importing the data into Cartegraph. RAS is performing a pilot
study, provide a final report and will assist the City in presenting data to City Council regarding
various funding amounts and how they can improve the City’s PCI and its level of service to
the general public. RAS is also completing a pilot study utilizing mobile LiDAR to assess two
corridors within the City. Mr. Gordon is the Project Manager.
C-34
G. Scot Gordon, PE, IAM – Assistant Project Manager
3
Pavement Design and Consultation Projects
• Texas Turnpike Authority – State Highway 130 Tollway – Lead Pavement Designer
• Texas DOT – State Highway 45SE Tollway – Lead Pavement Designer
• Texas DOT – IH-35E/IH-30 Dallas Horseshoe Managed Lanes Project – Lead Pavement
Designer
• Pavement Information Management Systems (PIMS) Software Development
• Metropolitan Government Pavement Engineer’s Council Design Standards and
Specification Research & Development, Denver, Colorado
• E-470 Toll Road, Douglas County, Colorado
• I-70, Glenwood Canyon, Colorado
• Evaluation of Streets, City of Glenrock, Wyoming
• Asphalt Study, Wyoming, Utah and Colorado
KEY PUBLICATIONS
Co-Author, Use of Recycled and Waste Fibers in Asphalt Concrete, Procedures of: Recovery
and Effective Reuse of Discarded Materials and By-Products for Construction of Highway
Facilities, Denver, Colorado, 1993, with D. V. Holmquist and T. W. Kennedy
Co-Author, User’s Guide for Pavement Information Management System, A manual for the
PIMS computer software, 1995, with Darrel V. Holmquist
Author, Use of Recycled Carpet Fibers in Asphalt Concrete , a presentation to the Recycling
of Fibrous Textile and Carpet Waste seminar at Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
Georgia , 1997 , Presentation
Author, MGPEC Design Procedure, comparison of the MGPEC Design Procedure to the
AASHTO Design Procedure , a presentation to the Colorado Association of Geotechnical
Engineer , 1997 , Presentation
Co-Author, Development of Pavement Design Concepts, Vol. II , Report to the Metropolitan
Government Pavement Engineers Council of Denver, Colorado , 1998 , with D. V. Holmquist
Co-Author, Pavement Design Standards and Construction Specifications, Vol. I, Report to
the Metropolitan Government Pavement Engineers Council of Denver, Colorado, 1998, with
D. V. Holmquist
C0-Author, Field Procedures Manual for the Soils Division of CTL/Thompson, Inc., Research
paper comprising the final submission required of persons enrolled in the ASFE
Fundamentals of Professional Practice, Class No. 09, 2000, with Robert W. Thompson
Author, Denver Area Aggregate Base Courses, Presentation and Procedures of: International
Center for Aggregates Research 8th Annual Symposium, Denver, Colorado, 2000,
Presentation
Author, Making a Pavement Management System Work for You , a presentation at the
Colorado Asphalt Producers Association Pre-Conference for Local Agency Session, “Pavement
Management for the Local Agency,” in Denver, Colorado , 2001 , Presentation
C-35
MIKE IJAMS
TITLE Geospatial Technology Manager | OFFICE Irvine, CA
Mike brings a unique cross section of skills, expertise and innovation as the leader of Fuscoe’s GIS & Technology
team, which provides specialized services that enhance and complement Fuscoe’s civil engineering work. An
avid aviator, Mike spearheaded Fuscoe’s UAV drone program which captures aerial imagery and processes
it into 3D point cloud and topographic surveys. In addition to drone services, Mike’s main specialties are
Geographic Information Systems and 3D visualization. He uses both to facilitate communication between
designers, clients and the public, and to clarify design intent, resulting in streamlined project approval.
Mike’s relevant project work includes:
• Rancho Guejito Aerial Tree Survey - UAV aerial tree survey of 23,000 acres in San Diego County.
Artificial Intelligence is being used to assess, count and sort trees and classify special vegetation.
• City of Lake Forest Street Pavement Assessment - Fuscoe provided image capture and processing
of arterial streets in Lake Forest. Artificial intelligence was used to analyze and identify street pavement
conditions. This technology helped the City to prioritize and plan annual street maintenance.
• Fairmont Miramar Hotel Revitalization, Engineering & Tree Survey - Fuscoe provided civil
engineering, UAV tree/inventory survey, topographic and site surveys, GIS documentation and EIR
support. FEI provided UAV 3D Point Cloud imagery of trees, gardens, pools, buildings and surrounding
neighborhood.
• Rancho Mission Viejo PA3 Cow Camp Road Aerial Survey - Fuscoe provided UAV aerial surveys
to help visualize Planning Area 3, the newest ranch-oriented community.
• Newland Sierra 3D Model & View Simulation - Fuscoe provided a 3D model and view simulation
video of the proposed residential master planned community to help build community consensus.
Additionally, Mike has applied our technology services to numerous projects including, Villas at Fashion
Island (monitor and document monthly progress of apartment construction in Newport Center in ultra-high
definition 4K video); ARDA Veteran’s Cemetery Site Feasibility (video simulation); St. Mary’s College
Campus Master Plan (topographic survey and aerial imagery), among others. He also established a web-based
GIS and file system for the City of Yorba Linda following the Freeway Fire and mudslides.
Mike was instrumental in obtaining Fuscoe’s 2019 technology patent. Fuscoe patented its exclusive Three-
Dimensional Modeling from Optical Capture. He also served as a Santiago Canyon College instructor, where
he taught an Introduction to GIS as part of the College’s Survey and Mapping Sciences curriculum.
EDUCATION
BA, Geography
California State University Fullerton
REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS
GIS Instructor, Santiago Canyon College
GIS Advisor, USGBC LEED Regionalization, Pacific Chapter
FAA Remote Pilot - sUAS
FAA Section 333 UAV Exemption
FAA Sport Pilot License (pending)
AFFILIATIONS
Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI)
PATENTS
US Patent No. US 10,297,074 B2
Three-Dimensional Modeling from Optical Capture
FEI TEAM MEMBER SINCE 2004
C-36f u I I C r c I e t h n k n g ®
Project Schedule
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 4-1
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Project Schedule
Our project schedule shows each major task identified in our scope of work, as well as quality
control milestones and meetings. Bucknam currently has ample staff to apply to this project in
order to meet an aggressive schedule (3 field technicians will drive the proactive schedule).
With a completed survey, our team will work with you to establish a PMP that provides specific,
manageable pavement segments, detailed maintenance schedules of needed repairs and cost
conscious maintenance recommendations that will assist you in preparing budget estimates
required to complete the scheduled work for fiscal year 2021-22 and beyond.
Our Critical Path Method (CPM) project schedule shows each major task identified in our scope
of work, as well as quality control milestones and meetings. Our Project Manager will oversee
all aspects of the project schedule including annual accountability, adjustment and
management.
• Project Kickoff – December, 2021
• Survey Completion – Jan through Feb, 2022
• Delivery of draft PMP – March, 2022
• City comments returned to Consultant – March, 2022
• Delivery of City Asset Management / PMP Final Reports – March, 2022
o RPV CIP data/Final Report, reporting and revenue projections will be submitted by March, 2022
o Final Asset / PMP Presentation to CC – April, 2022
• Publication of PMP software/database – Any time after acceptance of Final PMP
• All pavement and GIS data pertinent to the project deliverables will be submitted with the Final PMP report, April, 2022
C-37
ii,r:1.1:-,1Cte-:1W:·(i»n---------------x r -., --------r -T -7 ------r -T -7 ------r -T -7 --
~•~••••~1;•,1.,_,,j :,\.llo,lo ~.•,,,;1 I I I I I I I I I I I
1..J-1., ... ,_,j....,.,;,,.oe-,,1.,,."1;'\";<•l!,l'°l,!.,r ,.,.,~,,,
_,w ~i!.!t.?!:-=.!l"!:.i"G: _____________ •• •. • •••••••• • • • J _. • • • • • • • • • J • • • • • • • • ~ • • • • •
~('.'.:."''.:"''.:"''•~~--- - - - - - - - - - - - - -•• " • ¥11 •••••••• " ........... " ........... " ...... . ,.,..,:u ,•,~ia:.-1 ~..,r, ..... L~::, I I I I it I I I it I I it I I "
,$),,.,;., .. ,:.4 ~.J..-..
Quality Control Plan
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 5-1
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Quality Control Plan
Over the past two years, Bucknam has submitted fifty (50) METRO/OCTA compliant reports
for LA and Orange County municipalities, they include:
Our surveys follow the accepted ASTM D6433 procedure requirements. A copy of the QA/QC
plan utilized by our staff during the project will be submitted along with the PMP certification
documents. Our staff attends the OCTA PMP Distress Training Classes held in each year, 2011
thru 2021.
In February 2021 our staff was acknowledged as “qualified inspectors and firm” to prepare
PMP’s compliant with the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Guidelines (this
certification/compliance runs through June 2023).
Additionally, Bucknam was selected in July, 2021 to perform a 10-year Pavement
Management Plan analysis on ALL 35 Orange County local agencies PMP’s.
Quality Assurance / Quality Control
Introduction
When performing data collection in any field, the need for quality control is paramount as it is
essential for accurate planning, analysis and design. This is particularly true for collecting
pavement distress data for a pavement management program. The Quality Assurance / Quality
Control (QA/QC) Plan establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures
for update of the roadway asset / pavement management program.
Objectives
This document constitutes a formal QA/QC Plan for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. It was
prepared on November, 2021 and last revised in November, 2021. Specifically, it is intended for
the 2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Plan Update. The focus is on the collection
of network-level pavement distress data (defined by National Cooperative Highway Research
Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 401 Quality Management of Pavement Data Collection, as
“Network-level data collection involves collection of large quantities of pavement condition
data, which is often converted to individual condition indices or aggregated into composite
condition indices”.
C-38
orange -Los Angeles county l'MI' lhents
Duarte
Ra ncho Pa los Verdes ... '. "t· ..
..... "" .. """ ................. +··
................. S..i.~.11.a.1 ... ~.i.1' ................ +
. ...... ... .. 1\11011~ereyPa.~k ......... +
....... C~rn pt?n ... " .f .. .
Mnnrnvi ;:i .. ....... ...... .... ..... . ' ...... f .. .
La Verne ........ " ""' .....
Gardena
Hunt ingto r Beach
Alham bra
C:u lyE!r C:ity
Pa lmdale
Po mona
Hermosa Beach
.... LYr1 \\'00~
Rnc;pmp;:i(:
Covina
.. EI S.e.gurido
Lom ita
Glen dora
Sierra Madre ...............•....................
Sou t h Pasadena ···············•· ................... .
Norwa lk
RP llfln w <>r
So ct h Gat e
RSM
Tus t ir
Westm in;t er
La Habra
Full erton
Quality Control Plan
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 5-2
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Structure of QA/QC Plan
The following components are addressed in this QA/QC Plan:
• Condition survey procedures used;
• Accuracy required for data collection;
• Inspector qualifications and experience; and
• Safety.
Condition Survey Procedures
The governing document in performing
condition surveys for the City of RPV is
ASTM D6433-20 “Standard Practice for
Roads and Parking Lots Pavement
Condition Index (PCI) Surveys.” Both
asphalt concrete (AC) and Portland
cement concrete (PCC) pavements are
included in this protocol. The following
distresses are collected for each
pavement type:
For the purposes of this report,
Bucknam has demonstrated below how
our project team will implement
QA/QC procedures during the project.
Our QA/QC plan focuses on the how each pavement inspection is performed, what distresses
are collected and ensures that it complies with the OCTA/METRO PMP guidelines.
We have summarized our QA/QC procedures below:
a. Descriptions of condition survey - Our staff follows the required Condition Survey
Protocols (CPMPG, Chapter 2); our staff assesses each pavement section for the
minimum distresses outlined within Chapter 2, page 2-1. Additionally, based on the
pavement conditions found, we collect all MicroPAVER/StreetSaver Army Corps of
Engineers (ACOE) distresses, if found within the sample sections; for example, if slippage
cracking, potholes, etc. are found our survey technicians record the proper information.
b. How data was collected - Our surveys follow the OCTA/METRO accepted walking
guidelines. All sections that our staff surveys are performed through the walking
method. Our staff physically measures the width of every section as well as measure for
any square footage adjustment that need to be added or taken away from a sections
“true area” (i.e. cul-de-sac, bus pads, street width variances, etc.). Samples taken
always include a minimum of 2,500 SF coverage unless specific section limits prohibit
this. Arterial section samples utilize a 3,500 SF sample size due to the larger section
area (this is within the ASTM D6433-20 sample size calculation. Field crews typically
include one individual for residential pavement sections while Arterial (MPAH) routes
utilize a two-person crew for safety, traffic control and increases quality control.
c. Accuracy required for data collection - We use a statistical sampling approach for
measuring the quality of our field technician’s work.
C-39
!. AI UgJt or (fatigue) cr ocking
2 .. Blee:l in.g····················
3 .. s lock.crockfng .......... .
4 ._Bump s a nd HSS· ...... ..
s ._ c orrug-Jtlon .•••
G .. Cepre s-s ic,n ............... .
7 .. Edgc.c rJck lng ...... .
Portland Cem ent Concre t e (J o in ted) ....
\1. e low ui:/euckllng
.)2. .c o rn e r Br:aks ...... .
:3. Ol'lfd ~C Slob
.. )4. p u rability r o'') Crac kin& ....... :::~~::::~~:::~~~::.
)5. Foult l ng ...••....••...•••...
. ... lG. J =,int .S-e a l .i am -a.ge .................................... .
\7. Le nci sho ul dc r Dro p .:,f f .................. .
3. Jc.in t .P.:fl e ctbn. 0-acl,;in_g .)3 .. Li near.Cr-H king ....................................... .
!:l ._t mci sh :ul dcr .u roi:. c tf ...•• ..•• )!:I . Potch mg (lorgc) one v t1ht',' cut ~
10 .. Longit ud inc l & Tr.H'ISVe~-e Cr-H k i1:g ...... t~:.~~~'.~,.~!~s.L~!~~.'.'L...... .. ............... ..
11..''J t c:tu ng ~nd Ut l ht'/ {;Ut l 1J ti;h mg ........... \n . l 10 h$h~C. AggrcgJ t C .. . ................. .
1 2 .. Po li s h e d css:HS.ate .......
B.11:lt hc lc~ .......................................
14 .. R~ilroa~ O-os-s ir;8 , .........
~ •. Kutnng·····················
1G •. Sh o ving ••...•••...•••...••
1 1 •. shpp.igc c rock ing .••
13. s v,e ll ............................
19 •. wc.;t hcnng ..
2'J.R~ve li ng
)12. Po p c,ut s
\i:;.1•u mp mg
. .. )14. Pun d n u t ...... .
\b . KJ1l rood c.:ro~-~ing
)1G. S-:a linK, ma p crH kini:;: a n ~ cra:;:in,g
\H . Shn nkJ gc c r ock~
)18. Sp a lli n~ (co rn e r)
. ... !l.Y· s i:olhng.(Jo int ) ....
Quality Control Plan
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 5-3
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
In this manner, 10 percent of the original surveys are re-surveyed by a different survey
crew than the original, supervised by a field supervisor, and the results are compared to
the original surveys. Our QC process involves checking the field crews’ work in a “blind
study” fashion. Quality control checks are performed at the end of each survey week.
This ensures that all field personnel are properly collecting section samples, distress
types and distress severities for all street segments.
When QA/QC issues are found, our staff documents the issues within
MicroPAVER’s user interface. If distress types found are not within the 97%
accuracy our QA/QC is expanded beyond our minimum 10% resurvey to 20% of
the original survey
d. Random and Systematic Re-Inspections – As described above our staff re-inspects, as a
minimum, 10% of the original survey. Per the agencies requests, our staff will submit
PCI reports to the agency as project status reports for their review. Agencies will
typically review specific pavement sections for PCI accuracy based on recent overlay or
slurry seal maintenance; this serves as an initial accuracy check on our surveys (outside
Bucknam QC efforts). Additionally, our staff performs “ride-a-long” surveys with local
agency staff to build consensus on how our MicroPAVER ACOE surveys are performed,
recorded and reported on.
Random re-inspections will include a representative selection across the following
categories:
• Functional classed (i.e. MPAH, locals), Surface types (e.g. AC or PCC), Pavement
conditions (e.g. good, fair, poor), Inspectors, Geographical areas, if applicable.
For systematic re-inspections, this could be due to noticed trends such as specific
treatment types (e.g. open-graded mixed), a specific inspector or geographical area. In
these cases Bucknam continues to utilize a 10% re-inspection policy.
e. PCI Comparison with Past Surveys - if previous inspection data is available, new PCI’s
calculated through the most recent inspections will be compared to previous PCI’s. If
the variance in PCI is greater than +/- 10 PCI points, these sections will be flagged for
further investigation and/or re-inspection.
f. Schedule of data submittal – Pending on the City’s last major PMP submittal, Bucknam
will assist the agency in submitting the following:
Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) routes will be surveyed and reported
on at least once every three years
Local streets will be surveyed and reported on every three years
Corresponding MPAH and local PCI reporting and budgetary reporting will be
submitted every two years
g. Experience of Inspectors – Bucknam staff have been trained on the use of MicroPAVER
and the ACOE MicroPAVER segment calibration and inspection practices.
C-40Pl I
Quality Control Plan
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 5-4
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Mr. Peter Bucknam (Project Manager) and essential staff have completed the
MicroPAVER Certification of Professional Development courses. All Bucknam field
technicians are trained using the ACOE survey methodologies and have passed OCTA’s
prequalification testing (see below).
Bucknam Infrastructure Group inspectors have attended formal training on pavement
condition distress surveys. This training was conducted prior to performing any work
using the ASTM D6433-20 protocols, consistent with OCTA’s requirements.
h. Field data collection safety procedures – Bucknam field survey techniques utilize the
following procedures:
a. All vehicles are properly marked or flagged with appropriate sign markings
indicating that a “ROADWAY / PAVEMENT SURVEY IS IN PROGRESS”
b. All vehicles have the proper flashing amber light beacons placed on the top of
the vehicle to allow for proper visibility and line-of-site warning
c. Large MPAH routes are surveyed using two field technicians to increase traffic
control warning and safety
d. While parking or stopping along the survey route, vehicles legally park within
the right-of-way or use a parking lot
e. All field technicians wear ANSI – 105 Class II safety vests
i. Additional roadway asset inventories identified within the scope of work will follow the
same methodology for QA/QC stated above.
C-41
2 20 20 OCTA
.......................... _2/~2_0~/2_0 ___ -+ ___ O_CT_A __ ---1
2/20/20 OCT A
Acceptance of Conditions
City of Rancho Palos Verdes 6-1
2021 Roadway Asset / Pavement Management Program
Acceptance of Conditions
Bucknam Infrastructure Group has reviewed the City’s RFP and sample Professional Services
Agreement and at this time we do not have any comments or requests for changes.
C-42Pl I
FY2021-22 Capital Improvement Program
8800 Series Right-of-Way Improvements Project Code:8844
Pavement Management Program - Triennial Update
The Pavement Management Plan (PMP) is updated every three years to
evaluate the condition of the City’s roadway system and to identify
Citywide Arterial and Residential Street Rehabilitation projects.
Project Cost Estimates
Prior FYs FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 FY25/26 FY TBD Totals
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TBD $0
Engineering $120,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 TBD $430,000
Environmental $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TBD $0
Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TBD $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TBD $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TBD $0
Inspection $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TBD $0
$120,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 TBD $430,000
Funding
202 (Gas Tax) $120,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 TBD $430,000
$120,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 TBD $430,000
Estimated annual operating cost None
Estimated Schedule:
The next update is scheduled for Fiscal Year 2021-22
Project Location Map Background and Justification:
The City uses the Pavement Management Program to determine the
condition of existing pavement and accordingly schedule the rehabilitation
of specific areas and roadways throughout the city.
The Metropolitan Transit Authority (Metro) requires the PMP update in
order for the City to continue receiving Proposition C funds. It must be
conducted every three years. Failure to complete will result in lost
funding.
D-1
CllYOr L ~CHO PAlDS VERDES
Ci\TCH STRE ,ETS BEFORE THEY FAIL
I • M
'Pi:tvlir.ftin.t '-ti• (Y~J
=~ .. ..... -~ _,. __ ~
:=:--~ !
.-..-~-R
Q
i:-;.:t ...... 11,y~---~ 11
i ...., iih ..,.