20220607 Late CorrespondenceCITYOF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
TO:
FROM:
HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
CITY CLERK
DATE: JUNE 7, 2022
SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA
Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material presented
for tonight's meeting.
Item No. Description of Material
Non-Agenda PowerPoint from: Charles Brown
7 Email from: Mickey Radich
** PLEASE NOTE: Materials attached after the color page(s) were submitted
through Monday, June 6, 2022.**
Respectfully submitted,
;t
L:\LATE CORRESPONDENCE\2022\2022 Coversheets\20220607 additions revisions to agenda.docx
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Good Afternoon Mr. Radich,
Karina Banales
Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:56 PM
Mickey Radich; CC; CityClerk
Re: City Council Meeting: 06/07 /22; Item #7 Hatano Farms
Follow up
Completed
Thank you for your email regarding agenda item #7, the Hatano Farm Area at Upper Point Vicente. Staff's recommendation to
repurpose the site as a native plant farm allows for the City to come into compliance with the POU and NCCP and offers a pathway to
continuing a farm albeit with native plants that are permissible. The Native Plant Farm allows for native wildflowers and cacti to grow
for habitat restoration and to assist with fire mitigation. The PVPLC is also interested in potentially onboarding Mr. Martinez as an
employee or consultant. It is important to City Council that Mr. Martinez has the opportunity to remain a part of the farm. Based on
City Council direction, staff is trying to find a compatible use, achieve historic designation, and allow Mr. Martinez to work on the farm
at some capacity all within the restrictions of the site.
We agree that the farm is very important to the Japanese Farming history of the Peninsula and we see value in recognizing the James
Hatano Farm as a place of cultural and historical significance. Staff has had preliminary conversations with the school district about
education opportunities as well as PVPLC, including the installation of interpretive signage and docent lead tours about the history.
The NCCP limits what types of plant species can be grown in the preserve and staff is mindful of these restrictions.
Staff is prepared to act expeditiously to carry out the direction given at tonight's City Council meeting.
Again, thank you, for your feedback Mr. Radich, I have submitted your email as late correspondence.
Sincerely,
Karina
From: Mickey Radich <mickeyrodich@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 4:42 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: City Council Meeting: 06/07 /22; Item #7 Hatano Farms
The Staff report suggests that the PVPLC continues to have interest in
using this site for growing native plants to be used for habitat restoration
projects throughout the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. I don't think it is
prudent to have the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy operate
the Hatano Farm as a seed farm. The PVPLC can operate a seed farm
1
anywhere else in the Preserves, if they desire. There are 2 (4 or 5 acre)
plots of land next to the church and near the Veterinary Clinic on PVDS
and near Hawthorne Blvd. that the PVPLC has cultivated and extensively
irrigated over the last few years. The intention was to raise native plants
for restoration purposes and they are now a wasteland of weeds. I don't
see how they can manage a seed farm.
Hatano Farm is a historical plot of land. It is the last Japanese farm left
on our Peninsula and certainly a part of our history. The Japanese farmers
did not only grow cactus and baby's breath flowers, but they also grew
garbonza beans as well as many other vegetables and flowers on their
farms. Think of Annie's Vegetable Stand. Hatano Farm is located next to
our Civic Center site and could be used for educational purposes. In a
recent email I explained how a partnership with the PVPUSD, RPV and
Kathy Kellogg Anderson (a local resident and co-owner of Kellogg Garden
Products) can make Hatano Farm a practical learning experience for the
young children in the PVPUSD. It can be part of our Civic Center
development as well.
I agree that our City should apply for a Historical Monument/Land
status for this property. Historical Monuments/Land can be used for
educational purposes. I am surprised that the Staff report only
recommends a seed farm and does not show an option as a farm learning
experience for our children in the PVPUSD. My suggestion is only listed as
correspondence.
2
Seagate Storm Drain
CJ
0
0 cr,
I a-,
('i")
0
0~
ct:,
M 1!1
(', ,'; z " " " < .g
"'
~ ,,
~
: , ,r i
~ ~~ ,. ~ ~ E' i ! ii ~ e i; £ M !£
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Monday, June 6, 2022 4:56 PM
CityClerk
FW: City Council Meeting: 06/07/22; Item #7 Hatano Farms
From: Mickey Radich <mickeyrodich@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 4:43 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: City Council Meeting: 06/07 /22; Item #7 Hatano Farms
The Staff report suggests that the PVPLC continues to have interest in
using this site for growing native plants to be used for habitat restoration
projects throughout the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. I don't think it is
prudent to have the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy operate
the Hatano Farm as a seed farm. The PVPLC can operate a seed farm
anywhere else in the Preserves, if they desire. There are 2 (4 or 5 acre)
plots of land next to the church and near the Veterinary Clinic on PVDS
and near Hawthorne Blvd. that the PVPLC has cultivated and extensively
irrigated over the last few years. The intention was to raise native plants
for restoration purposes and they are now a wasteland of weeds. I don't
see how they can manage a seed farm.
Hatano Farm is a historical plot of land. It is the last Japanese farm left
on our Peninsula and certainly a part of our history. The Japanese farmers
did not only grow cactus and baby's breath flowers, but they also grew
garbonza beans as well as many other vegetables and flowers on their
farms. Think of Annie's Vegetable Stand. Hatano Farm is located next to
our Civic Center site and could be used for educational purposes. In a
recent email I explained how a partnership with the PVPUSD, RPV and
Kathy Kellogg Anderson (a local resident and co-owner of Kellogg Garden
1
7.
Products) can make Hatano Farm a practical learning experience for the
young children in the PVPUSD. It can be part of our Civic Center
development as well.
I agree that our City should apply for a Historical Monument/Land
status for this property. Historical Monuments/Land can be used for
educational purposes. I am surprised that the Staff report only
recommends a seed farm and does not show an option as a farm learning
experience for our children in the PVPUSD. My suggestion is only listed as
correspondence.
2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITYOF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
CITY CLERK
JUNE 5, 2022
ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA
Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material received through
Monday morning for the Tuesday, June 7, 2022, City Council meeting:
Item No.
Q
M
N
1
3
7
Description of Material
Updated Attachment A and Attachment C
Email exchange between Staff and Brenna Terrones
Email exchange between Staff and Jodi
Updated Attachment A
Email exchange between Staff and Jim Knight
Email from Noel Park
Respectfully submitted,
c?:z)~~,
Teresa Takaoka
L:\LATE CORRESPONDENCE\2022\2022 Coversheets\20220502 additions revisions to agenda thru Monday.docx
Enyssa Momoli
From: Matt Waters
Sent:
To:
Thursday, June 2, 2022 11 :21 AM
CityClerk
Cc:
Subject:
Daniel Trautner; Cory Under
Late Corr Item Q 6-7 CC Mtg
Attachments: Att A Late corr 20220607 Q Parks City Signage Long Form PSA Express Sign and
Neon.pdf; Att C Late Corr 2022_0607 Q ESN Proposal.pdf
Hi Teri-
Good morning. As we discussed, attached are two items for 6-7 CC late
correspondence re Item Q City and Parks Monument Signage:
• Att A ESN Proposal
• Att C Professional Service Agreement
Thanks-
Matt
Matt Waters
Senior Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Department
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
www.rpvca.gov
mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p
1 Q
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
By and Between
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
and
EXPRESS SIGN & NEON
A-1
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND
EXPRESS SIGN & NEON
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ("Agreement") is made and
entered into on June 7, 2022 by and between the CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a
California municipal corporation ("City") and Express Sign and Neon, a California Company]
("Consultant"). City and Consultant may be referred to, individually or collectively, as "Patty" or
"Parties."
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals, the performance of the
services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.
B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal for the performance of the
services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the
City to perform those services.
C. Pursuant to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, City has authority
to enter into and execute this Agreement.
D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of
those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that
the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by
the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
1.1 Scope of Services.
In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall
provide those services specified in the "Scope of Services", as stated in the Proposal, attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein
as the "services" or "work" hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this
Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and
facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough,
competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services
contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its
ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it
shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required
hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose
A-2
intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase "highest professional standards" shall mean
those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work
under similar circumstances.
1.2 Consultant's Proposal.
The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant's Proposal which shall be incorporated
herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency
between the terms of such Proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall
govern.
1.3 Compliance with Law.
Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder
in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and
any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is
rendered.
1.4 California Labor Law.
If the Scope of Services includes any "public work" or "maintenance work," as those
terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of
Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more,
Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in
California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws,
including the following requirements:
(a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that some or all of the work to be
performed under this Agreement is a "public work" as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and
that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1
( commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts
and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR")
implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance
monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by
regulation.
(b) Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent
required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the
prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any
interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Consultant
acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of the prevailing rate of per diem
wages, and Consultant shall post a copy of the same at each job site where work is performed
under this Agreement.
(c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall comply with
and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment
of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The
A-3
Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit $200 (two hundred dollars) for each calendar
day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the
DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to
this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.
(d) Payroll Records. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the
provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subconsultant to:
keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as
specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as
provided by Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records.
( e) Apprentices. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions
of Labor Code Sections 1777 .5, 1777 .6, and 1777. 7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8,
Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects.
Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all
apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall
provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program.
Within 60 (sixty) days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of
its subconsultants shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice
hours performed under this Agreement.
(f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Consultant acknowledges that 8 (eight) hours labor
constitutes a legal day's work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code
Section 1810.
(g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by
the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess
hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit $25 (twenty five dollars for each
worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any
subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work
more than 8 (eight) hours in any one calendar day and 40 (forty) hours in any one calendar week
in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of 8
(eight) hours per day, and 40 (forty) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public
work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than one
and 1 ½ (one and one half) times the basic rate of pay.
(h) Workers' Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700
provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its
employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code
Section 1861, Consultant certifies as follows:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require
every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to
undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will
comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of
this contract."
A-4
Consultant's Authorized Initials ----
(i) Consultant's Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor
who will perform work under this Agreement, Consultant shall be responsible for such
subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720)
of the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract
with any subcontractor for work under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to take all
actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance,
including without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the
subcontractor on a periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to
pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take
corrective action to halt or rectify any such failure by any subcontractor.
1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.
Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals
as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement.
Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus
applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary
for the Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any
such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City
hereunder.
1.6 Familiarity with Work.
By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly
investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered
how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and
restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve
work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or
will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services
hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will
materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform
the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's risk until written instructions
are received from the Contract Officer in the form of a Change Order.
1.7 Care of Work.
The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to
furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents,
plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be
responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City,
except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence.
A-5
1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties.
Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective
obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all
instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry
out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible
for the service of the other.
1.9 Additional Services.
City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without
invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services
or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be
undertaken unless a written Change Order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant,
incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra
work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the
written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to 15% (fifteen percent)
of the Contract Sum; or, in the time to perform of up to 90 (ninety) days, may be approved by the
Contract Officer through a written Change Order. Any greater increases, taken either separately
or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant
that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of
Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided
pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant
anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City
may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims
for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures
established in this Section are followed.
If in the performance of the contract scope, the Consultant becomes aware of material defects in
the scope, duration or span of the contract or the Consultant becomes aware of extenuating
circumstance that will or could prevent the completion of the contract, on time or on budget, the
Consultant shall inform the Contracting Officer of an anticipated Change Order. This proposed
change order will stipulate, the facts surrounding the issue, proposed solutions, proposed costs
and proposed schedule impacts.
1.10 Special Requirements.
Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof
are set forth in the "Special Requirements" attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated
herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit "B" and any
other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit "B" shall govern.
A-6
ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
2.1 Contract Sum.
Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the
amounts specified in the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and
incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for
actual expenses, shall not exceed $345,600 Dollars) (the "Contract Sum"), unless additional
compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.9. Method of Compensation.
The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii)
payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services; (iii)
payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant's rates as specified in the Schedule of
Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks,
and (b) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the
Schedule of Compensation.
2.2 Reimbursable Expenses.
Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for
reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in
advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5,
and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the
attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City.
Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If
Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant
shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.
2.3 Invoices.
Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice, using the City template,
or in a format acceptable to the City, for all work performed and expenses incurred during the
preceding month in a form approved by City's Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for
payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the
Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the
following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-
contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant
shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.
City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine
whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this
Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant
which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause
Consultant to be paid within 45 (forty-five) days of receipt of Consultant's correct and
undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run
procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the
event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City
A-7
to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice
provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided
herein or any applicable law.
2.4 Waiver.
Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be
deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.
ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
3.1 Time of Essence.
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
3.2 Schedule of Performance.
Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a
written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in
the "Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by this
reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the
Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer through a Change
Order, but not exceeding 90 (ninety) days cumulatively.
3.3 Force Maieure.
The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the
services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to
unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant,
including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather,
fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes,
wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant
shall within 10 (ten) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in
writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of
delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when
and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer's
determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall
Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of
this Agreement, however caused, Consultant's sole remedy being extension of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section.
3.4 Term.
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one (1)
year from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit
"D").
A-8
ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK
4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.
The following principals of Consultant ("Principals") are hereby designated as being the
principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the
work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
Edgar Aceituno
(Name)
Frank Bang
(Name)
Project Manager
(Title)
President
(Title)
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the
foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.
Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for
directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the
services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be
under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the
foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced
by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize
only the personnel included in the Proposal to perform services pursuant to this Agreement.
Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of
Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this
Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant's staff and. subcontractors,
if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any
such performance. City shall have the right to approve or reject any proposed replacement
personnel, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
4.2 Status of Consultant.
Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation,
debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless
such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in
writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or
any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers,
employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant's officers, employees or
agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may
otherwise accrue to City's employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may
have to any such rights.
4.3 Contract Officer.
A-9
The Contract Officer shall be Dan Trautner or such person as may be designated by Cory
Linder, Recreation and Parks Department Director. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to
assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the
services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract
Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean
the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in
writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to
carry out the terms of this Agreement.
4.4 Independent Consultant.
Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode
or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein,
except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge,
supervision or control of Consultant's employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing
their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required
herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly
independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are
agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed
to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any
joint enterprise with Consultant.
4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.
The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and
employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore,
Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services
required hereunder without the express written approval of the City; all subcontractors included
in the Proposal are deemed approved. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein
may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation
of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of
City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons
acting in concert of more 25% (twenty five percent) of the present ownership and/or control of
Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such
unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No
approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability
hereunder without the express consent of City.
ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
5.1 Insurance Coverages.
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of
any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own
expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts
described below and in a form satisfactory to City.
A-10
(a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general
liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01,
in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily
injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that
has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO "insured contract" language
will not be accepted.
(b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile
insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury
and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with
Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-
owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each
accident.
(c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall
maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection
with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any
policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this
Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than
three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.
( d) Workers' compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers'
Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer's Liability Insurance (with limits of at
least $1,000,000).
(e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds
under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated
herein.
(f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required
in the Special Requirements in Exhibit "B".
5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to
City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation
endorsement for workers' compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be
approved by City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification
of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any
time.
(b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder
by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
A-11
( c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be
primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required
to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination
of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or
be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-
contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City's own insurance or self-insurance shall
be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
(d) City's rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required
under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced,
City has the right but not the duty to obtain and continuously maintain the insurance it deems
necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will
withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City
may cancel this Agreement.
( e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance
company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance
or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an
assigned policyholders' Rating of A-(or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger)
in accordance with the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by
the City's Risk Manager.
(t) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured
pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or
appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow
Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to
waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery
against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of
its subconsultants.
(g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant
acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform
Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the
City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
(h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or
limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other
requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific
reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given
issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other
coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums
shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained
by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits
of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
(i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or
broker and insurers to provide to City with a 30 (thirty) day notice of cancellation (except for
A-12
nonpayment for which a 10 (ten) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each
required coverage.
(i) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be
endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers
shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any
excess/umbrella liability policies.
(k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages
required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting
endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing.
(I) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for
all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer's limits of
liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
(m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants,
subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in
the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements
required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes
all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements
of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants,
subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review.
(n) Agency's right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any
time during the tenn of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by
giving the Consultant 90 (ninety) days advance written notice of such change. If such change
results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate
Consultant's compensation.
( o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to
and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated,
lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these
specifications unless approved by City.
(p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely
notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant's performance
under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required
liability policies.
( q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its
own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be
necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
5.3 Indemnification.
A-13
To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") against, and will
hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial,
administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs,
penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein "claims
or liabilities") that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in
connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein
of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or
entity for which Consultant is legally liable ("indemnitors"), or arising from Consultant's or
indemnitors' reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant's or indemnitors'
negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this
Agreement, and in connection therewith:
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any
of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and
attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its
officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection
with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of
Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and
employees harmless therefrom;
(c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to
any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims
arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work,
operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers,
agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or
employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys'
fees.
Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if
it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and
failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This
indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or
omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional
services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring
as a result of City's sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent
permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City's negligence,
except that design professionals' indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities
arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The
indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive
termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION
6.1 Records.
A-14
Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of
accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the
disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the "books and records"), as
shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract
Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete
and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all
times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make
records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three
(3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such
records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant's business,
custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by
Consultant's successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully
cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is
made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records
Act.
6.2 Reports.
Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports
concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer
shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost
of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant
agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that
may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein
or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant
shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the
estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design
services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.
6.3 Ownership of Documents.
All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes,
computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the "documents and materials")
prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this
Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the
Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim
for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full
rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any
use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of
uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the
City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant's guarantee and warranties
shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such
documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein.
All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared
by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify
A-15
City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents
and materials that may qualify as "works made for hire" as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such
documents and materials are hereby deemed "works made for hire" for the City.
6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in
performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the
public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such
information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written
authorization from the Contract Officer.
(b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not,
without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City
Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at
depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed
under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary"
provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
( c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of
Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City
shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and
fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant's conduct.
( d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work
performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be
present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully
with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests
provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean
the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION
7.1 California Law.
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to
performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions
concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be
instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other
appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal
jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District
Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los
Angeles, State of California.
A-16
7.2 Disputes; Default.
In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall
not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed
after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the
reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the
default. This timeframe is 15 (fifteen) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if
circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold
all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the
alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding
invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take
necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City
to give notice of the Consultant's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City's
legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
7.3 Retention of Funds.
Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant
(whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in
dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or
damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by
reason of Consultant's acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant's
obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount
or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear
to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for
interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of
City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of
the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.
7.4 Waiver.
Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any
party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other
provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.
Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of
the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by
a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a
waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of
any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this
Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party
of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or
A-17
different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the
other party.
7 .6 Legal Action.
In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in
equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel
specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain
any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary
provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections
905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.
7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.
This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided
in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this
Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant,
except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be
such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. Upon receipt of any notice of
termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be
specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for
all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services
authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation
or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the
event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the City need not provide the
Consultant with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7 .2.
7.8 Termination for Default of Party.
If termination is due to the failure of the other Party to fulfill its obligations under this
Agreement:
(a) City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work
and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable
to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the
compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate
such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off
or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.
(b) Consultant may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, terminate the
Agreement upon written notice to the City's Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to
payment for all work performed up to the date of termination.
7.9 Attorneys' Fees.
If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any
action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such
A-18
action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or
equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. Attorney's fees shall include attorney's
fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney's fees shall be entitled to all other
reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other
necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be
deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or
not such action is prosecuted to judgment.
ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION
8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.
No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any
successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which
may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the
terms of this Agreement.
8.2 Conflict of Interest.
Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall
acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests
of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant's performance of services under this
Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person
having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor
without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times
avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City
in the performance of this Agreement.
No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in
this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee paiiicipate in any decision relating to the
Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation,
partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any
State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay
or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.
Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons
claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of,
any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual
orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of
this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed
and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed,
religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other
protected class.
8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.
A-19
Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § I I 01 et seq., as amended, and in connection
therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ
such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this
Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of
unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such
liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees,
incurred by City.
ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
9.1 Notices.
Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either
party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and
either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City
Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of
Rancho Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 and in
the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of
this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of
address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in
72 (seventy two) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.
9.2 Interpretation.
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the
language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship
of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
9.3 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.
9.4 Integration; Amendment.
This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive
expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements
between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels
any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between
the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification
of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by
the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be
waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
9.5 Severability.
A-20
In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or
sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid
judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall
not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this
Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent
of the paiiies hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives
either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.
9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.
No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in
this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision
relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of
any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or
in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly
interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of
"financial interest" shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be
"remote" or "noninterests" pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant
warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party
including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration,
or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement.
Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s),
omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money,
consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City
official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any
agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other
conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render
this Agreement void and of no force or effect.
Consultant's Authorized Initials ---
9.7 Corporate Authority.
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such
party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this
Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally
bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not
violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall
be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
A-21
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the date and year first-above written.
ATTEST:
Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
William W. Wynder, City Attorney
CITY:
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a
municipal corporation
David L. Bradley, Mayor
CONSULTANT:
By: ___________ _
Name:
Title:
By: ___________ _
Name:
Title:
Address:
Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required
from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2)
Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULT ANT'S
SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE
INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR
OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULT ANT'S BUSINESS ENTITY.
A-22
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
ST A TE OF CALIFORNJ A
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On ____ , 2022 before me, _______ , personally appeared------~' proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalfofwhich the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: _______________ _
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
0 INDIVIDUAL
0 CORPORA TE OFFICER
□ □ □ □ □ □
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) 0 LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER -------------
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A-23
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On ____ , 2022 before me, _______ , personally appeared _______ , proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalfofwhich the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature:--------------~
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
0 INDIVIDUAL
0 CORPORATE OFFICER
□ □ □ □ □ □
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) 0
GENERAL
LIMITED
. ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER -------------
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DA TE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A-24
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Des ign, fab r i catio n and i nst al lat io n o f s ig .age or:
• 7 City 11o nur en t sig , s
• 9 Pa rk en t ryway s ign s (the first to be insta{(ed no J.ater than August Jl, 2022)
Task 1. Assessme nt; Pre-design Piann1ng
1.1 HU NT/ SN to cor d uct .a kic k-o'f eet i ng to hel p c lari fy t he goa ls of th e prog ra rr, iden tify
like ly issues an d c hall enges and set a 'g,et it do ne' atti t ude .
1.2 HUN T/ESN to rev iew any relat ed City docwmrn s, zo ning p lans and wo k-to -dat e re l at ed o
the pro je ct.
1.3 HU NT/ SN to d(we lop a roc e ss to work coop era t iv ely w jth City staff and sta keh olde rs.
1.4 HU NT to rev iew and deve lop a worki ng know le ge of cornrr m ity, it's history, c u lt ure , ar t s, etc.
1.5 HU N t o co n _ c a r eview of exis t ing signag e w it hin and ad jacent to t he pro ·ec t area.
Pho"og rnp r epresenta t ive signage.
1.6 UN / SN t o ident if y al l of th e sig ns tha t need to e r ern ovedl ais. pa rt of he r,ew sign p og ra m.
1.7 ESN to scou all new .sign l o c ation s t o i n d 01Jt a ny c h a ll nges s u e as m e d i an w id t hs, nearb y
t ree s, e lect ri ca l , et c . t at ay be a c halle ng e as t he proj ec t moves forwa rd.
1.8 H JNT t o co nfir m p ro ject sc hed ule w it h the Ci y an ES N.
1.9 HU NT t o eview f in dings v,,it h City sta ff.
Work Products :
Eva lu at ion of exis t ing co d it io ns; P ,elir ina r y si na e loca ions : Pro ject sc hed l le
A-25
Task 2. Program Design and Development
2. ·1 HUNT Evolve a logic and strategy for
potenti,11 design opporhm,tie:;.
including pote,1tial sign types, wording approach, and
2.2 HUNT to prepare prel1minc1ry s,gn location plans ,rnd demolition plM1s.
} 3 HUN f lo develop 2-3 distinct design wncepl (enderings lh;,l expre;,s l•ie civic brnnd strategy nf denlityirig
entry points to the Cit,, nnd Parks. E~:plore visual forrn for each sign type, both honztnal and vertical options
Designs to be baseo on existing colors arid iogo. Consider historic, cm1:e:dual and em-ir·o111-r1ent.:il
in the design process. Present lJP to three conceptuc1I s,g·,-:igc system themes
2.4 liUN f to review oesigns lo ensure r::mnpliance with California MUlCD, AAS! I O and FIIVVA standards.
2. 5 Collaboration between Hunt ;,nd ESN thnwghout the process lo ensure co11s!n.1c:tabilily of the s-gri;,ge.
2.6 HUNT to present in person, the designs to the Cit 1· selection committee.
2.7 f-JlJNT -Through one round of rehnement, develop best of com:eptual design:; into reun,mended
2 .8 Cost es.timating by E9~ will be ,,.,,,,,.,n,·m,,n throughout the design process to ensu··e sign elem ems can be
manufacLJred and installed vvilhin budget.
2 .9 HUNT/ESN to conduct one fmal presentation to City, if needed.
Work Products:
Rancho Palos Verdes 1,v,ayfinding strateg:;1 statement,: Prelimhar:y· sign locatton plans; Visual prese,,tatons of
concept and developed designs: and prnvrde Full-size paper patterns for City approval.
Task 3, Sign Fabrication
[SN to prepare shop drawings for revie,v.
ESN lo prepare color and material submitlab for nNiew·.
3.1
3,2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
ES~~ to prepare design-intent fabrication c1nd installation draw'ings inchid111g details, sections t1nd clcvat,ons.
E.SN lo prepare a pha!,ed implernentation p1an
FSN to get all struchual engineering sta11:1p{:d and delivered t<} I he City for apprcvaL
ESN to pull necessary permits for building and r,g:,t-of-way permits.
ESN lo participate i,1 meetings and agency presentations.
Work Products:
Shop drawings, f\/hiterial samples; Cofor sarnples
A-26
Task. 4. Installation
,1:1 ESN to field s1vvey ail locations.
4.2 [SN to perform demoLtion of all sign.age designmed in Task 2 for removal.
4.3 ESN to coordinate with City stalf for :nstal'aiirn,s !hat rnay affect traffic and provide traffic control plans to
the City as necessary.
4/1 ESN to instaH oil monurn(·!llt signs p,,, specific:al ions.
,1,5 ES~,; to provide c1II as·built drawir,gs to the City
4.6 E.SN au:ompanied by• Hum Desigr, lo conduct fir1al in:..pection w·ith City :..lair co co11firm both desigr1 and
fabric.Jtion
4./ [SN to c1i:.kJress post lnstal'ation rnrn,nents from
W(Jtk Produ'Cts:
• lnstr.illod "11omm1ent s,gnage
A-27
EXHIBIT "B"
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
A-28
EXHIBIT "C"
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
SCOPE OF SERVICES: DESIGN BUI LD SIGN AGE PROJECT PWC REGISTRATION NO: 1000017285 I DGS SB (MICRO): 2003760
ITEM MODU OfS(JUPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICI AMOUNT
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
PROGRAM DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT
Pe r the Approa(h of Servi(es detailed on the City and Park Entry Monument Signs Proposal
document dated May 6, 2022, and after the project scope adjustments requested by the
City on May 16, 2022, ESN will produ(e design (On(epts, shop drawings, engin eeri ng,
submittals , and material samples for City approval as per bid documents .
CITY ENTRY GATEWAY SIGN
Fabricate and inst all 10'-0" high non-illuminated gateway signs as per bid documents
and as referenced on the in cluded design sketches . The signs will include below grade
concrete foot ing with reinforcing stee l and steel supports as per engine erin g. The desi gn
parameters include simi lar materia ls used on the Rancho Palos Ve rdes Reverse Project:
Aluminum construction , 1/B"aluminum skin , Weathered Steel, Solid Aluminum
dim ensiona l letters, Polyurethan e Coatings, 3M Vinyl, and CHPL material.
Vertical Design assumed .
PARK ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN
Fabricate and install S' -6" high and below non-illuminated park entry signs as per bid
documents and as re ferenced on the included design sketches . The signs will include
below grade concrete footing with reinforc ing stee l and steel supports as per eng in eering .
The design parameters in cl ude simi lar materials used on the Rancho Palos Verdes Reverse
Project : Aluminum construction , 1/8" alum inum skin, Weathered Steel, So lid Aluminum
dim ens ional lette~. Polyur eth ane Coatings, 3M Viny l, and CHPL mat er ial.
Hor izontal Design assumed .
DEMOLI TION
Remove and dispose of existing signs incl uding concrete foundations as per bid documents .
PROPOSAL PRICE BASED ON :
1. Prevailing wage rates .
2. Day time (9:00 AM · 4:00 PM)
3. Price Escalation (Labor & Material) Good Up To June 23, 2022 .
$16,000.00 $16,000.00
$18,78 0.00 5131 ,460 .00
9 $16,860.00 S 151,740.00
16 $2,9 00 .00 $46 ,4 00 .00
S34s,6oo.oo I
A-29
EXHIBIT "D
Project Schedule
PROPOSED BASELI NE PROJECT SCHEDULE REV(0G-01-2022 )
City of Rancho Pa los Verdes -City and Par k Entry Monument Signs
Nllo:!'JZZ
h ~No,,o,: • Owot. • ~\Mt • r"""' i• ~
0 •(ltv &oP'll rii:(ll1t \/Mth1-Mllt1W U 04'yNIHl,/UIZrrill/11/U
• NH' NO; I "''lllt«t Ol>llcr>
~<>(<)<l(atptRe,,,;i,f,t<1gD1;,i
,.,.ion ..,.,.f/l lll1 1rilll!JIU
i,u..,i Mon6Jn,m ntu 7/7/n
1d1; foJ/f/J) fn}J9Jll
o,xiencb n1l.\f><>tl f1cauan,ouu IOd~"> M<>l'>l /1 1/11 ~r11/n/n
Crt ,-Rl'Vll!1"of~~nN~n~S la~, Mon1/U/U /.l()f'Olll~ln
'lop<l(:11.-~IIC'H
~twd(Ol'm<t.<1iotlPIH~&~10""' )d1,1 Tvf7/U,/22 Tn,17/'1l/U .
0,,K,t,~Y)C,,, f1Nl.-.001Ct/JIS ldf•; rn1/1'/ll ,r,1/:tJ/:tl. ..
10 11..,.. ,.,_,1/11/1' l ri)/1)Jll
l<k>nl<fyliM..t.~'f;.,UIC~ll•>n< Jd~'fl ,1,,n1/11/u Wo<Jl/UJU
D'V•'•"-101.-s 1r-v 1/u /n ,117/nfn
• Pe,nlt 10•~ ,._..1/1/n 1,1s/U/U
l>r:rm11Prou,o,rt: 10dq, Monll,/1/11 fnl/11/l)
• f~bolr.otb, «1111_,,.. ,_,1/1,;/n M1,n 1r,fi,/1;
fRn:ql('(l'llt(fMt'l'lVp~rl>o!l'>t l(tO~~ ~lo118,'1:1,n2 frH3/lJ,/r]
~•!(,/l'tl>lfl< sie-n
~ljln T1fot•Pi!l Ent1y~1 .... 1(&J lOdl'tl ~IClf'!jl,..12 ff1'J/n/'n
S~<ll )'9t ,11vMcn~n,;mt SJiflS l7I U)!J,VI M\}!\9/WJ.2 Ml1f1H•/17!JJ.
• 1o;,,1'"1~°"""'lilion A l...._.li.ti<>n \.I d~ "'°"I/N/11 Wrd11/!JjJ) •
O.:mo[,1tto1>£Sotri&ln~,t1; ovic: ,cu-., >,lonenvu Wf.d8'J I/J2
cc,.,1..-/uppc, v.,.,1 ,,.m,n1 Pu> ~•«n
OemOC•l:,tl"fS•r,i,Slr.iutl Ptrt lti d-,s M~n,nl#n MonHJ/1 1/}'i ,
~""\' IHI'"
Of<'no{,lftll'ii~•gr,tllr,r:flllCrry 11<1eo,·1 11JelO/lf/1l 'W~l!/'ll1
~srm(IIIISltm
• Jln.i(1,t,...., ... ~ I d,-., TI1u ll/lO/U M ll/llhl
Oel'l1(1lll}U11(\(1J f lt'I.IIUtM 1111& l1U"3 l l'l~H /l0/l2 frrll/11/U c~--°""'
""'"'"~ ---.._. .. _.
---...... .,.,,,._ ____ .....,
...,...,, e,.,,,,.., ,-------, 0.-·•
-~--ri
1"
!•iK~!(;.!
l" ;:-< l fl IJ
~~,u ,.__,,,i:l.!l
J I 11 It ••' ,'I 1 • 1:
·-··· 7 Ok
l ... ..
t>-------------~-----ij 0,. . ..
A-30
E X P R E S S
SIGN & NEON COMPANY
2327 SOUTHWEST DR.
LOS ANGELES, CA 90043
323.291.3333
IN COLLABORATION WITH
I Hunt I 88 North Fair Oaks Avenue, #105
Pasadena, California 91103
626.793.7847 C-1
Table of Contents
a) Cover Letter
b) Approach to the Scope of Services
c) Organization and Staffing
d) Staff Qualifications & Experience
e) Project Shedule
f) Quality Control Plan
g) Acceptance of Conditions
h) Proposer's Certification of Addenda
Addi t iona l Representative Pro j ects for Reference
Express Sign & NP.on (Prime)
Hunt Design (Subcontractor)
Project Management and Commmunication Plan
for Design, Fa bricat ion and In stallation
DESIGN
Hunt Design
Te am and Management Plan
References
FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION
Express Sign & Neon
Team and Management Plan
References
2
4
5
8
15
16
16
17
19
C-2 2
E X P R E S S
SIGN & NEON COMPANY
2327 SOUTHWEST DR.
LOS ANGELES , CA 90043
T. 323.291.3333
F. 323.291.3704
www.ESNCO.net
STATE UC. #979879
U.L. LISTED #E 141997
May 6, 2022
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Attn: Cory Linder, Director of Recreation and Parks
RE: Request for Proposal for City and Park Entry Monument Signs
Express Sign & Neon is pleased to present our proposal along with Hunt Design Associates for the
Design, Fabrication and Installation of City and Park Entry Monument Signs.
Please see our company's contact information below:
FIRM NAME (PRIME): Frank & Son, Inc. dba Express Sign & Neon
FIRM ADDRESS: 2327 Southwest Dr., Los Angele s, California 90043
COMPANY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: Frank Bang
PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON: Edgar Aceituno
CONTACT PHONE: (323) 291-3333
CONTACT EMAIL: edgar.esn@hotmail.com
STATE LICENSE: 979879
CITY OF LOS ANGELES SMALL LOCAL BUSINESS: 2914
DGS SB (MICRO): 2003760
SUBCONTRACTOR FOR DESIGN: Hunt Design Associates
Hunt Design Associates will take the lead on the design effort as a subcontractor to Exp re ss Sign & Neon.
Jennifer Bressler, Principal/Proje ct Director
88 N. Fair Oaks Ave. #105, Pasadena, CA 91403
(626) 793-7847 office/ (310) 613-4514 cell
jen@huntdesign.com
Our company is currently in good standing, and we are unaware of any conflict of interest in performing
the prop ose d work.
Thank you in advance for the opportunity. Feel free to contact me if you should ha ve any questions.
Sincerely,
~
Frank Bang, President, CFO, Secretary
I Hunt I 88 Nort h Fair Oaks Avenue, 11105
Pasadena, California 91103
626 793 .7847
Design Subconsultant
City of Rancho Palos Verdes City and Park Monument Signs
HUNT DESIGN
Hunt Design and Express Sign & Neon are pleased to submit this proposal to plan , design, fabr icate
and insta ll a City and Park Monument Program for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. With this team
of design and construct ion, we offer the City thP. highP.st leve l of services and exper ience.
For over forty five yea rs Hunt Design has programmed, designed and supervised state-of-the-art
signage projects for both c ivi c and recreation cl ients, includin g over thirty city directional sign and/
or gateway projects in six states as wel l as mu ltipl e assignments for parks, beaches, The Walt
Disney Company and other operato rs of major attractio ns. Hunt Design has he lped cit ies and towns
of all sizes we lcome and direct visitors and express identity through creative signage and graphics,
including Santa Barbara, Palo Alto, Monterey, Pasadena, Newport Beach, La guna Hill s, Redondo
Beach and others .
Family owned and opera t ed Express Sign & Neon has been proudly serv ic in g Ca lifornia for over
30 years and has a proven track record of fabricating and delivering custom signage for cities and
private industry throu ghout Ca lifornia . ESN is passionate about working alon gside the world's top
designers, architects and brands to bring the design vis ion to life from concept to flawless execution.
Hunt Design and Express Sign & Neon form an expert group that can provide Rancho Palos Verdes
wit h a successful team to design and execute a successfu l City and Park Monument Program.
We understand the scope of work . Th e needs of Rancho Palos Verdes parallel those of many of our
c lient cities: plan, design, document and im plement a brand-driven sign program, all wit h the input
and participation of the City, key stakeholders and the publ ic. A nd, all within the environmenta l,
architectura l and cultural context of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
We know cities. Because Hunt Design works frequently with and for city governments,
Downtowns and BIDs, we are familiar with the stake holder, public review and counci l approva l
processes . Excellent civic design and impl ementation requires a unique kind of consensus building
and comm uni cat ion; among our strengths are our meeting and dip lomacy ski ll s-Hunt works wel l
w ith com mittees, stakeho ld ers and the public. A ll of Hunt's many city sign projects have been
processed, gu ided and ultim ately approved by such gro up s.
We understand the region . Hunt Design has designed the branding and wayfinding signage for the
neighboring cit ies of Torrance, Redondo Beach, Newport Beach and OC Parks. Creating a distinctive
signage program w ill bring awareness to this unique City in relation to its regiona l neighbors.
Why Hunt Design and Express Sign & Neon? We have successfully co llabo rated on fi ve separate
projects for a varie t y of cities including the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. We love ou r work; we
love grea t places and great c iti es; our clients usually love us. We work rea ll y hard to help cities
communicate effect ively with both residents and visitors to improve visitor experiences and bui ld
civic brands.
We Want to Work with You. Hunt Design and Express Sign & Neon wo uld be honored to work in th e
City of Rancho Palos Verdes and to include the City among the great Southern California cities we
have an opportunity to impact.
This proposal describes our team and processes , and strives to highlight our experie nce of
providing excellent design serv ices and quality executio n that w ill enhance the Rancho Palos Verdes
experience . Our company is current ly i n good st anding, and we are unaware of any con flict of
interest in performing th e proposed work.
Respectfully submitted,
C-4
b) Approach to the Scope of Services
For cities to appear on the map of the 21st century, they need to focus on how they communicate and how
to trade on their unique qualities. Successful cities will connect people, movement and places efficiently;
they will be engaging and empowering, welcoming and easily understood.
What is Rancho Palos Verdes? How do I know I'm there? What are the unique and important destinations?
Can I walk to and between attractions? Where should I park? What is the local history? What about bicycle
paths and trails? Establishing a unique and appropriate identity and a sense of welcome and access
is not easy, but a proprietary signage program can make a substantial difference-an understandable
city is a welcoming city. Each and every sign is the voice of the City and collectively, signs are the true
interface between visitors and residents and a city's rich and varied assets.
What we know about the City of Rancho Palos Verdes
It will be our job to learn everything there is to know about Rancho Palos Verdes. Our two firms have
a good start based upon our our previous projects in Rancho Palos Verdes and within the region.
Here's what we know so far about the likely challenges and opportunities:
• City boundaries are not always well-defined for the driver
• The small median areas can often be a challenge to get signage big enough to make a difference
• Several access points
• The City and the commmunity have a very high sensibility for design
• The monuments previously designed by HUNT and fabricated by ESN have set the tone for the
new monuments to come. Our involvement in the previous work is an advantage because we can
hit the ground running on day 1!
Scope of Services and Methodology
To clarify the scope of work as described in the RFP, we are providing our understanding of the
project in our own words based on substantial experience with similar projects. We have arranged
the scope items to parallel our successful experience in other cities.
Areas and Elements
Design, fabrication and installation of sign age for:
• 7 City monument signs
• 9 Park entryway signs (the first to be installed no later than August 31, 2022)
Task 1. Assessment; Pre-design Planning
1.1 HUNT/ESN to conduct a kick-off meeting to help clarify the goals of the program, identify
likely issues and challenges and set a 'get it done' attitude.
1.2 HUNT/ESN to review any related City documents, zoning plans and work-to-date related to
the project.
1.3 HUNT/ESN to develop a process to work cooperatively with City staff and stakeholders.
1.4 HUNT to review and develop a working knowledge of community, it's history, culture, arts, etc.
1.5 HUNT to conduct a review of existing signage within and adjacent to the project area.
Photograph representative signage.
1.6 HUNT/ESN to identify all of the signs that need to be removed as part of the new sign program.
1.7 ESN to scout all new sign locations to find out any challenges such as median widths, nearby
trees, electrical, etc. that may be a challenge as the project moves forward.
1.8 HUNT to confirm project schedule with the City and ESN.
1.9 HUNT to review findings with City staff.
Work Products:
Evaluation of existing conditions; Preliminary signage locations; Project schedule
C-5 2
Task 2. Program Design and Development
2.1 HUNT -Evolve a logic and strategy for design, including potential sign types, wording approach, and
potential design opportunities.
2.2 HUNT to prepare preliminary sign location plans and demolition plans.
2.3 HUNT to develop 2-3 distinct design concept renderings that express the civic brand strategy of identifying
entry points to the City ,ind Parks. Explore visual form for each sign type, both horiztinal and vertical options.
Designs to be based on existing City colors and logo. Consider historic, contextual and environmental
qualities in the design process. Present up to three conceptual signage system themes.
2.4 HUNT to review designs to ensure compliance with California MUTCD, AASHTO and FHWA standards.
2.5 Collaboration between Hunt and ESN throughout the process to ensure constructability of the signage.
2.6 HUNT to present in person, the designs to the City selection committee.
2.7 HUNT -Through one round of refinement, develop best of conceptual designs into recommended designs.
2.8 Cost estimating by ESN will be performed throughout the design process to ensure sign elements can be
manufactured and installed within budget.
2.9 HUNT/ESN to conduct one final presentation to City, ifneeded.
Work Products:
Rancho Palos Verdes wayfinding strategy statement; Preliminary sign location plans; Visual presentations of
concept and developed designs; and provide Full-size paper patterns for City approval.
Task 3. Sign Fabrication
3.1 ESN to prepare shop drawings for review.
3.2 ESN to prepare color and material submittals for review.
3.3 ESN to prepare design-intent fabrication and installation drawings including details, sections and elevations.
3.4 ESN to prepare a phased implementation plan.
3.5 ESN to get all structural engineering stamped and delivered to the City for approval.
3.6 ESN to pull necessary permits for building and right-of-way permits.
3.7 ESN to participate in meetings and agency presentations.
Work Products:
Shop drawings, Material samples; Color samples
Task 4. Installation
4.1 ESN to field survey all locations.
4.2 ESN to perform demolition of all signage designated in Task 2 for removal.
4.3 ESN to coordinate with City staff for installations that may affect traffic and provide traffic control plans to
the City as necessary.
4.4 ESN to install all monument signs per specifications.
4.5 ESN to provide all as-built drawings to the City.
4.6 ESN accompanied by Hunt Design to conduct final inspection with City staff to confirm both design and
fabrication.
4.7 ESN to address post installation comments from City.
Work Products:
• Installed monument signage
C-6 3
Organization and Staffing/ Project Management and
Commmunication Plan for Design, Fabrication and Installation
THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES
Hunt DESIGN PROCESS
Jennifer Bressler
PrincipaVPraject Manager
Design Process , Art direction,
Committee Presentations
Coordination with Edgar Aceituno
and his team
FABRICATION & INSTALLATION
Edgar Aceituno
Project Manager
Overall project manager for
the Fabrication and Installation
Process , and coordination with
Jen Bressler and her team
Bret Yourstone ---------------------Simon Jeong,
Steve Hernandez
Technical Designer
Coordination of design
development details
with ESN 's team
Design concept renderings
Dinnis Lee
Technical Director
Overall peer review of technical
specs and how they play into the
final shop drawings and fabrication
Senior Designer
Daniel Salanic
Production Manager
Responsible for ensuring
fabrication is built to spec,
on schedule, and mee ting
our high-quality control
standards.
Jamani Gonzalez,
Superintendent
Supervises onsite construction
activities. Responsible for
maintaining construction
ta sks on schedule, coordinating
site work with City personnel,
and ensuring safety measures
are met.
C-7 4
Hunt Design -Firm Profile
Es tab lished over forty years ago, Hunt Desi gn is a g raphic design consulting firm specializing in signage
and environmental graphics programs for cities, public spaces, theme parks, retail projects, entertainment
centers and multi-use developments. Our serv ic es include ide ntity development, signage master
planning , concept consultation, programming, schematic de sig n, desig n development, documentation
and implementation supervision. Incorporated under th e sa me name since 1990, the firm is owned
and mana ge d by two partners, f eatw·es a full-time staff of seven, <1nd has been located in Pasadena,
California si nce 198 3.
Hunt Design is a national leader in th e planning and de sig n of enviro nmental gra phi cs and is one of the
larges t environmental graphics firms in the western U.S. Our diverse clients and proj ects take us all over
th e co untry and around th e wo rld-we have current assignments in eight states.
Origins of Urban Wayfinding and Hunt Design
In 1984 th e City of Pasadena engaged Hunt Desi gn for designs for the historic district, Old Pasadena.
What eme rg ed is one of th e first urban wayfinding projects anywhere. This seminal project se t the
standards, methodology, processes and technology for hundreds of similar projects around the US. Since
then, projects with and for cities and urban environments have become the specialty of the firm. Hunt
Design is a leader in this no w fast -growing city-specific discipline and we have been engaged for over
thirty city wayfinding projects, evo lv ing our approach and wayfinding strategies along th e way.
We have continuous wayfinding-related work with cities and active direct contracts with Pasad ena ,
Glendale, Santa Barbara, Monterey, Pal o Alto, Idaho Falls , Duarte, Paramount and La gu na Niguel . We
understand how cities function and how the publi c accesses and uses streets, bikeways and sidewalks.
We know well the city gove rnm ent and the public design proc ess.
We believe that free public places have the same needs and opportunities as paid de stinations. Cities
and their districts should have a sense of continuity, design and spirit, as does a place one pays fifty dollars
to enter. Things should be easy to find; unintended places should be discovered; v isitors should feel at
ease and co mfortable . Good wayfinding signage makes a city look organized, confident and inv it in g; it
invites circulation, both in car, on foot, and by bic ycle and fosters lon ger stays and encourages stronger
hotel and retail sales.
A partial li st of Hunt Desi g n city wayfinding
projects from the last ten years:
Downtown Los Angeles Walks
Glendale, California
Goodyear, Arizona
Idaho Falls, Idaho
Juneau, Alaska
Laguna Hills, California
Laguna Niguel, California
Long Beach, California
Monterey, California
Napa, California
Newport Beach, California
Paramount, California
Pasadena, California
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Redondo Beach, California
Sacramento, California -Central City
San Juan Capistrano, California
Santa Barbara, California
Santa Cruz, California
Torrance , California
Walnut Creek, California
Westwood Village , Los Angeles
Wayfinding for other Visitor Environments
One unique Hunt Design quality is our long history
of planning and designing wayfinding for well-known
commercial de stinations-we apply lessons learned in
ticketed environments to the free public rea lm . Some
examples include:
The Walt Disney Company -over twenty assignments
National Park Service -over seven assignments, including
Statue of Liberty, National Mall
Greenfield Village, Dearborn, Michigan
Golden Gate Bridge
Alcatraz
Museum of Science & Industry, Chicago
Hollywood Bowl, Los Angeles
Golden Gate National Recreation Area, San Francisco
Jefferson Arch , St. Louis (National Park Service)
Rose Bowl, Pasadena, California
Alcatraz, San Francisco, California
Palos Verdes Nature Preserve
C-8 5
Hunt Design -Dedicated Project Team
We offer Rancho Palos Verdes a principal-based design team that has worked together in
combination of over thirty city wayfinding programs. Each person brings unique skills and
experience to civic wayfinding. Principal Jennifer Bressler will lead the project and direct the
design effort by designers Bret Yourstone and Steve Hernandez. Te ch nical Director Dinn is Lee will
be on call to review technical details and design intent drawings alongside ESN Express Sign & Neon.
Jennifer Bressler, Principal/Project Manager
Jennifer joined Hunt Design in 1996 after working with the prestigious design firm, Looking. She has
project managed and designed over one hundred signage and graphics projects for Hunt Design
including Top of the World Visitor Center at the New York World Trade Center, Sears Tower Skydeck,
Vasquez Visitor Center and streetscape projects for the cities of Redondo Beach, Oxnard, Wichita
and Pasadena, She has degrees from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Art Center College
of Design and is a recent national board member of the Society for Experiential Graphic Design. Her
personal experience includes teaching at Art Center College of Design and UCLA Extension. In 2002
she was named partner in the firm and manages most of the firm's parks, trails and exhibit design
projects. Since 2006 she has been in charge of the firm's many projects for the OC Parks regional
park system, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, National Parks of New York Harbor, including
the Statue of Liberty, and Rock Creek Park in Washington DC.
Jennifer is known for determined project management, creative design and excellent client relations.
Bret Yourstone, Designer
Hunt is lucky to be able to entice some of the most talented young designers from around the
country. We are excited to have Bret start his design career with us after studying at the University
of California, Davis with a unique focus on environmental graphic design. His practical experience
in pop up exhibits and city wayfinding projects as an undergrad has allowed him to jump in and
play a significant role in a number of projects in the office . He is helping to develop signage and
guidelines for the Hayward Area Recreation and Parks District, as well as wayfinding planning and
design for the Presidio. He is also providing support for the Grand Avenue project on the team with
Frank Gehry and Pentagram. He has also just completed exhibit graphics for Hamilton: The Exhibit
under a very fast-paced schedule.
Bret is known for functional but elegant systems design, and his easy going personality!
Steve Hernandez, Technical Designer
Steve joined Hunt Design in 1990 and has contributed to and worked on over one hundred signage
projects, including San Diego Zoo, San Diego Safari Park, Santa Ana Zoo, Shanghai Disneyland, Euro
Disneyland-France, Kennedy Space Center, MGM Grand Las Vegas, Paris Las Vegas, Discovery
World-Taiwan, and Hong Kong Disneyland. His personal experience includes numerous projects with
Walt Disney lmagineering, W.E.T. Design and designing products for the giftware industry. Steve's
city wayfinding experience includes Redondo Beach, Palo Alto, Walnut Creek, Rancho Cucamonga,
Redondo Beach, Oxnard, Pasadena and others.
Steve is known for mu/ti -discipline, anything is possible design, and impeccable model making.
Dinnis Lee, Technical Director CAD
With over thirty-five years experience in the development and production of environmental graphics,
Dinn is has worked with such firms as Ampersand Contract Signing Group, Sanchez/Kamps
Associates, Gensler Associates, Donahue Schriber and the Irvine Company. Since joining Hunt
Design in 1992, he has made major technical contributions to such projects as Wichita, Los Angeles
Walks, Oxnard, Newport Beach, Redondo Beach, Fontana, Pasadena Playhouse District, Inglewood,
Sacramento and others.
Dinnis is known for solving difficult technical problems in the studio and in the field.
C-9 6
Hunt Design -Current References
Please contact any of these current and recent Hunt Design city and civic clients for comments on
our creativity, service and professionalism, and our ability to successfully interact with the public,
stakeholders, commissions and city government to get designs approved and built.
Both Jennifer Bressler with Hunt Design and Edgar Aceituno with ESN project managed the
City of Santa Barbara -Citywide wayfinding
630 Garden St, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Adam Ziets
805. 897-1981 / AZiets @S antaBarbaraCA.gov
Teri Green, Public Works Department of Transportation
805.564.5656 x4604 / TGreen @S antaBarbaraCA.gov
Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy
Palos Verdes Nature Preser ve
976 Silver Spur Road #207, Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
Adrienne Mohan, Executive Director
370.541.7613 x203 / 310.930.4332 cell/ amohan @pvplc.org
City of Redondo Beach Citywide Wayfinding and
City, Park, Pier and Harbor Monuments
_.._..,. __ redondo 415 Diamond Street, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
11 11 A c H Cameron Harding, Community Services Director
370.318.0610 / Cameron.Harding@redondo.org
PAfADENA
Brad Lindahl, Manager, Planning Department
310.372.1171 x 2286 / brad.lindahl@redondo.org
(currently working on the Redondo Beach Transit Center)
City of Pasadena Citywide Wayfinding and Civic Monuments
221 East Walnut Street #210, Pasadena, CA 91101
Bahman Janka, Transportation Administrator
626.744.4610 / bjanka @cityofpasadena.net
Westwood Village Business Improvement Association
Village Wayfinding
10880 Wilshire Boulevard . Suite 117
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Andrew Thomas, Executive Director
310.470.1812/ andrew@westwoodvillagedistrict.com
Jennifer Bressler has led each of our long list of projects and is one of the most professional
and talented consultants I've ever had the pleasure to work with .
Assisting Jennifer, Steve Hernandez is also a very talented and committed professional.
Both of these individuals have provided careful and complete attention to all aspects of our
projects, down to the last detail, for which we are very grateful!
-Maggie Healy, Assistant to the City Manager, City of Redondo Beach
C-10 7
ESN -Express Sign & Neon -Firm Profile
Express Sign & Neon is a full service sign company offering design, fabrication, and installation services to
both the public and private sectors. Much has changed since our humble beginnings as a two employee vinyl
shop serving local businesses back in 1989. Express Sign & Neon now fabricates a large variety of sign types
ranging from freeway oriented illuminated rylon s to wayfinding and directional signage. Individual project size
now in the millions and our geographical reach nationwide. In our 31 years we have successfully completed
projects for real estate developments, corporate branding campaigns, and municipal wayfinding projects .
What sets Express Sign & Neon apart from other sign companies is our ability to use new and creative
methods to create effective yet beautiful signage programs. In our 31 years of service we have had the
opportunity to work with developers, architects like HOK and Gensler, and design firms like Hunt Design
and RTD. We believe that with the experience we have acquired over the years on projects w ith similar
scope as this one makes us a prime candidate for this project.
FULL SERVICE SIGN COMPANY
From designs to permits, from fabrication to installation, we take care of every aspect relat ed to your
sign project. We can handle all documentation necessary for obtaining approvals and city permits.
State of the Art In-House Production
All of our signs are built in our own 10,000 s.f. facility. Materials are cut with precision CNC computerized
routing machine, even the most complicated designs can be custom made.
Free Consultation & Estimate
No project is too big or too complicated. Our expert staff members will work with your sign project
every step of the way.
SERVICES
Job Survey
Site surveys are performed by our staff technicians to provide clients accurate design options . Our experienced
staff analyze and produce all information necessary to maximize signage potential for every location.
Design
We create sign designs that work for our clients as effectively as possible. Every sign is planned and
engineered always keeping the design intent in mind, fulfilling any given technical requirements, as well as
desired aesthetic elements.
Permit
Obtaining proper sign permits is a series of complex tasks. Our permit service includes all processes to secure
permits -landlord approval, procurement, city planner consultation, code research, analysis of municipal
codes and ordinances, and available certified engineering calculations. It is always our goal to work with our
clients to create the most effective signage allowed in any respective jurisdiction.
Fabrication
By using the highest quality materials and state-of-the-art equipment, we take pride in providing clients
beautiful and durable signs. All of our signs are manufactured in accordance with U.L. guidelines and all parts
are U.L. listed.
Installation
From small and delicate interior signs, to monuments and high rise building exterior signs, our technicians
are installation experts. We are fully insured so you can rest assured that we can accomplish even the most
demanding of installations.
C-11 8
Representative Projects
In our long list of satisfied customers you'll find a variety of entities including:
The Port of Los Ange/es, University of California, Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Metro Signage Project
California State University, Dominguez Hills, Town of Mammoth Lakes, Long Beach Community College,
and Antelope Valley College
Fabrication and Installation of Projects in Collaboration with Hunt Design
Orange County Parks -Monuments and city park ,iynage -Fabrication and Installation
City of Pasadena -City wayfinding fabrication and installation
City of Santa Barbara -Citywide signage and wayfinding
Palos Verdes Nature Preserve -Fabrication and installation of monument and park interpret ive kiosks.
Small Business Certifications
DGS Small Business (Micro) 2003760; City of Lo s Angeles Small Business 2914
ESN Dedicated Project Team
Express Sign & Neon has a team eager to be put to work for the City of Rancho Pa los Verdes .
The project will be led by Edgar Aceituno as Project Manager
Ed gar will be the daily single-point-of-contact and the primary point of contact to resolve any issues,
clarify cost, clarify schedule, and answer any questions. This in dividu al will be the project lead for the
exec ution of this project for the entire duration of th e project.
edgar.esn@hotmail.com / (323) 291-3333
The res t of the ESN team is composed of Daniel Salanic, Production Manager, Jamani Gonzalez,
Superintendent, and Simon Jeong, Senior Designer, who bring to the tabl e more than 50 years
of combined signage experience and knowledge of the unique issues related to delivering a
wayfinding project.
ESN -Express Sign & Neon -References
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA -2018
Citywide Wayfinding Signage Project
630 Garden St, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Adam Ziets (805) 897-1981
AZiets@SantaBarbaraCA.gov
TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES
Citywide Wayfinding Signage Project -2020
437 Old Mammoth Rd., Mammoth Lakes , CA 93546
Jennifer Shedden (706) 965-3653
j shedden @townofmammothlakes.ca .gov
LAKE HAVASU CITY, NEVADA
Citywide Wayfinding Signage Project
ANTELOPE VALLEY COLLEGE -2021
Campus Wayfinding Signage Proje ct
3041 W Ave K, Lancaster, CA 93536
Jeff Carter 909-476-0590
jeffcarter@lmcc i.co m
2330 McCulloch Blvd N, Lake Havasu City, Arizona, 86403
Scot Lewis 928.854.0779
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Metro Wayfinding Signage Project
Uninco rporated Los Angeles County
Ali Dana (626) 458-3110
adana@dpw.lacounty.gov
Project Examples
lewiss@ lhca z.gov
USC MEDICAL HOSPITAL
Wayfinding Signage Proj ect -2016
2051 Marengo St, Los Angeles, CA 90033
Terence McNeal (323) 226-8370
tmcneal@dhs.lacounty.gov
The following pages provide examples of some of Hunt Design's and Express Sign and Neon's expe rience
designing and building city and park monuments.
C-12 9
I Hunt I
i''
',
' .. __ ,.:1,· .' -<~--}i:'. .) {'
PALOS VERDES NATURE PRESERV E
PALOS VERDES, CALIFORN I A
• Signage master plan for the coastal community of Ranc ho Palos Ve rde s
• Ex t ensive public process and presentations to stakeholder groups
• In cl ud es entry identification , rul es and regulations , and interpretive signage
10
I Hunt I OC PARKS -S IGNAGE MA STER PLAN
COUNTY OF ORANGE , CAL I FORNIA
Comprehens ive park signage and wayfinding master plan
• four d istinct design variations to match t he broad range of parks (32) -regional, wilderness,
beach and historic sites
• ma in park entry signage, park directionals, orien t ation maps and regulatory signage
11
I Hunt I SANTA BARBARA WAYFINDING
SANTA BARBARA, CA L I FO R N I A
Directio nal sign syste m for the coastal City of Sa nta Barba ra.
• helps vis itors find civic landma rk s, public t ransporta ti on and cu ltural destinations
• uniqu e co lo r sys t em to di ffere ntiate t he citi w id e signa ge from t he wate rfront and t he hi stor ic
El Pueb lo Viejo area
• inc lud es bot h ve hicu lar and pedes t rian signage
72
I Hunt I CITY OF REDONDO BEACH /GATEWAYS
REDONOO BEACH, CALIFO R N IA
Urban identity ex pressed through a new logo and city-wid e sig nage program.
• we lcoming monu m ent signs
• large district gateway elem ents
13
I Hunt I NEWPORT BEACH
NEWPORT BEA C H , C ALIFORN I A
Wayfinding and gateway program for the 36 square mile area of Newport Beach
• ide ntifies and directs visito rs to six d istricts w ithin the ci t y lim its
• inc lude s ve hi cu lar wayf inding signs, ga t eway monument s, and the district identificat ion signs
• incorporates sign re moval plan to eliminate visual clutter
14
PROPOSED BASELINE PROJECT SCHEDULE REV(0G-01-2022)
City of Rancho Palos Verdes -City and Park Entry Monument Signs
"' ~
~ ;::
~ z ~
" z
iii u ;:i
>-
Jun 19. ·22 Jun 26, ·22 Jul 3, ·22 Jul 10, ·22 Ju l 17, ·zz Ju! 24, ·22 Jul 31, ·22 Aug 7, ·22 Aug 14, ·22 Aug 2 1, ·22 Aug 28, '22 Se p 4, ·22 )ep 11, ·22 Sep 13, ·22 Sep 25, ·22 Oct 2, ·22 Oct 9, ·22 Oct 16, ·22 Oct 23, '22 Oct 30, ·22 Nov 6, ·22
Start Design Plans& f abrication Fini sh
Mon6/l3/22 Mon7/11/2.2~Fri Mon8/15/22.-Mon 10/17/22 Fri 1l/1 1
Ide
Mo
Jun e 2022 July 1022
Existing Sign Demofmon & tnsta&ation
Mon 6/29/22. -Wed 11,1'9_12.2
August 2022 Septem ber 2022 Octob er 2022 Novemb er 2022
Task Nam~ .., Ourati .., Start y Hom, 31 s 10 1s m 2s 30 s 10 15 20 25 30 4 9 14 19 24 29 3 8 13 18 23 28 3 8 13 16 23 ZS 7 12
~ City & Park Entry Moument Signs
~ NTP No: l • Project Design
Des ign Co ncept Renderi ng Du e
Des ign Se lection M eet i ng
Des ign Plans & Specifications Du e
Ci ty Review of Des ign Plans &
Specifi cat ions
110 day Mon 6/13/2 Fri
3Sdays
19 days Mon 6/13/22 Thu 7/7/22
1 day Fri 7 /8/22 Fri 7 /8/U.
10 days M on 7/11/22
1 day Mo n 7/25/22
Re vi sed Co nstru ction Plans & Specs Due 3 days
o w ner Re view -Final Approvals 1 day
Tu e 7/26/22 Thu 7/28/22
Fri 7/'25!/22
• Sign location Marking
Identify & M ark Sign l oca t ions
10 DigA lert
11 • Permits
12 Permit Process ing
1l • Fabrication
14 Fabricat e Civic Ce nt er/Upper Po int
Vi ce nt Park Sign
1S Sign Type -Park En try Signs (8)
16 Sign Type -City M onument Signs (7)
17 • Existing Sign Demolition & Installation
18 Demo Exist ing Sign & Inst all : Civ ic
Ce nter/Upper Poi nt Vi cen t Park Sign
19 Demo Ex isting Signs & Inst all Park
En try Signs
20 Dem o Exist ing Signs & Inst all City
M onume nt Signs
21 • Final Clean-up & Close-outs
22 Demobiliza tio n/ Final Clean-u p &
Close -o uts
e) Project Schedule
10days Mon 7/11/12 Fri 7/22/22
3 days
7 days Thu 7/14/22
10 days Mon 8/1/'12 Fri 8/12/U.
10 days
46 days Mon 8/15/22
10 days M on 8/15/22
20 days Mon 8/29/22
16 days Mon 9/26/22
53 days
3 days Mon 8/29/22
16 d ays Mon 9/26/22
17 days Tu e 10/18/U. We d 11/9/22
2 days Thu 11/10/U. Fri 11/11/U.
2 days Thu 11/10/22 Fr i 11/11/22
The anticipated project schedu le as defined in the RFP is aggressive, but doable.
We may decide as a united team with the City of Palos Verdes that priorit izing t he fabrication and i nstallat ion of the one pa rk entry sign
for insta lla tion no later than August 31, is the primary focus. We want to rush where it's necessary, bu t want to make sure we take the
time to make sure th is aggress ive schedule does no t impa ct the design or the qua lity o f the fabr ication or instal lation. Not knowing what
is ahead , de pending on t he design and final approvals, we will adjust this schedule with the City as needed.
Strategies for Success
By H unt Design taki ng t he lead on focus ing on the design in Tasks 1 an d 2, ESN can sta rt strategizing and costing ear ly in the process.
Th is strategy is beneficial to the Ci ty because each of our companies is focusing on what we do best. By the t ime Hunt Des ign ha nds
over the baton to ESN to start construction details, we will have worked out the planni ng necessa ry to priortize ce rtain elements of the
project. This w i ll allow ESN to get demo lition done sooner, t he pre -si t ew ork, obtain permit s, etc.
Cri1ical
Critical Split
Critica l Progress
Task
Spl it
Task Progress
Manual Task
Start-only
Finish-only
Duration-on ly
Base line
Base line Split
Base line Milestone <
Milestone ♦
Summary Progress ___ _
Summary
Man ua l Summary
Project Summary A -----J
External Tasks
ExlemalMileslone '
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Dead line ,.
C-18
l o~.
~°" .,. 0%
f) Quality Control Plan
Both Hunt Design and ESN prioritize their work at the highest le vel of quality at all times. From the
inception of the design all the way through fabrication and installation, both HUNT and ESN will
be re!>µonsible for quality control in their own firms, as w ell as ke eping a close eye on each other!
The benefit of a design /build partnership is that the designer is involved from the beginning to
set the level of quality prior to fabrication . From that point, ESN will do quality control inspections
throughout the fabrication phase, and will inspect all work prior to delivering to site. Hunt Design will
stay involved to ensure the design is carried out as approved in the more preliminary design tasks .
Both Edgar and Jennifer will be supervising and reviewing the process , their staff, and the work from
start to finish. Both teams have highly qualified technical staff not necessarily integral to this project,
but can also act as a peer review and be part of the quality control.
Our two firms together have over 75 years of experience which proves our level of service and
attention to details and quality control. Jen and Edgar work well together, and have the projects and
clients to prove it!
g) Acceptance of Conditions
We accept all of the conditions listed in the RFP document and Sample Professional Services
Agreement (Attachment D of the RFP). We take no exception to any of the details.
C-19 16
C ITVO RA NCHO PALOS VE RD S
PU tC WORI< O-fJ°'RT M NT
April 27, 2022
ADDENDUM NO. 01
TO THE City and Park Entry Monument Signs REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
The following changes (revisions, additions, and/or deletions) as noted below, are hereby
incorporated and made a part of the on-call construction management & inspection services
request for proposals. Portions of the RFP, not specifically mentioned in the Addendum,
remain the same. All trades affected shall be fully advised of these revisions, deletions, and
additions.
This Addendum forms a part of the request for proposals for City and Park Entry Monument
Signs and modifies the original request for proposals.
Each proposer shall be responsible for ascertaining, prior to submitting a proposal, that it has
received all issued Addenda and shall ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM ON
THE PROPOSER 'S CERTIFICATION, attached. A proposer's failure to address the
requirements of this addendum or failure to acknowledge the receipt of this addendum may
result in that proposal being rejected.
Note the following changes and/or additions to the City and Park Entry Monument Signs request
for proposals . The proposer shall execute the Certification at the end of this addendum and
shall attach all pages of this addendum to the proposal.
Delete: Page 6
Replace with: Revise page 6 (Attached) to replace "Upon selection of design, submit design
plans and specifications for review and revise according to City mark -ups" with
"Upon selection of design, submit design plans and specifications for review and
revise according to City mark -ups. Sign drawings must be approved by a
structural engineer."
Delete : Page 8
Replace with: Revised page 8 (Attached) to delete "A registered Professional Engineer must be
the Project Manager."
End of Addendum No. 01
Any questions regarding this Addendum should be directed to the Cory Linder, Director
of Recreation and Parks at (310) 544-5260 or coryl@rpvca.gov. ·
Frank Bang, President, CFO, Secretary
[NAME],
[TITLE]
PAGE 1 OF 1
C-20 17
PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION
I acknowledge receipt of the foregoing Addendum No. 01 and accept all conditions
contained therein.
Proposal's Signature
Frank Bang, President, CFO, Secretary
By
5/6/22
Date
Please sign above and include this signed addendum in the proposal package. Failure to
do so may result in that proposal being rejected.
PAGE 2 OF 2
C-21 18
L
I Hunt I
L
I I
I
LAGUNA HILLS WAY F INDING
LAGUNA HILLS, CA LIF ORN I A
I I
I L
Direc ti onal sign system for an affluent city in South Orange County
• helps visitors find civ ic landmarks and shop pi ng destinations
• layer ed panels give the city a unique vis ual ident ity
• cons ists of 7 medians signs and 42 vehicular direc ti onal signs
/ 11~
LAGUNA ~ILLS
19
;;----.
.. ., · CITYOF ~
.... D UARTE
I Hunt I CITY OF DUARTE SIGNAGE AND WAYFINDING
DUARTE, CALIFORN I A
Ci t y wayfinding program to strengthen city image and increase brand consistency
• entry monument and city boundary sign age
• city way findin g and street identification signage for motorists
20
I Hunt I OXNARD GATEWAYS
"Branded" gateway and comprehensive sign program for t he entire city
H(CJJ2:}4:SIGN
21
I Hunt I PASADENA GATEWAYS
PASADENA, CA LI FORNIA
Urban gateways as part of a comp rehens ive wayfinding program.
• three architectural formats for varying site conditions
• extens ive public participation and review
22
I Hunt I SAN JACINTO PLAZA,
EL PASO, TEXAS
• Identification and ammenity signage for park renovation in downtown El Paso
• Alligator icondeveloped to reference hi storic fountain at center of pla za
• Natural materia ls used throughout the park
23
WALNUT CREEK WAYFINDING
WA L NUT CREEK , CALIFORNIA
Citywide wayfinding program for the City of Walnut Creek
• helps visitors find civic landmarks, public transportation and parking
• includes vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle signage
24
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Late correspondence -item M
McKenzie Bright
Wednesday, June 1, 2022 9:20 AM
CityClerk
FW: SB 830 -School Enrollment Funding
From: Brenna Terrones <terronesb@pvpusd.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 8:40 AM
To: McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>
Cc: Megan Wescott <wescottm@pvpusd.net>
Subject: Re: SB 830 -School Enrollment Funding
This is great!! Thank you so much.
Brenna M. Terrones
Assistant Superintendent Administrative Services
Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District
P:
F:
terronesb@pvpusd.net
From: McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 7:56 AM
To: Brenna Terrones <terronesb@pvpusd.net>
Cc: Megan Wescott <wescottm@pvpusd.net>
Subject: RE: SB 830 -School Enrollment Funding
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the district. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize
the sender and know the content is safe.
Good morning Brenna and Megan,
The RPV City Council will be considering sending a letter of support for SB 830 at the meeting on June 7. The staff report
and draft letter are available at the following link.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
McKenzie
1 M.
McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5305 mbright@rpvca.gov
Connect with the City from your phone or tablet, download MyRPV.
Thb e-mail message conmins inforrnat!on bdongin9 to tho C:ity of Rane.ho Palos Verdes, which may be pdvilcgcd, confidential and/or protected from
(bdosurc. The inforrm1tion is intended only for use of the individual or entity named. Untn1thorizcd dbsernination, distribution, or ccpyinq is strictly prohibited,
you received this cnnil in error, or arc not an intended recipient, plea'.;c notify the sender immediately, Thank you for your as<stancc and rnop0iratio11,
From: McKenzie Bright
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 1:20 PM
To: Brenna Terrones <terronesb@pvpusd.net>
Cc: Megan Wescott <wescottm@pvpusd.net>
Subject: RE: SB 830 -School Enrollment Funding
Hi Brenna and Megan,
Just wanted to follow up to see if PVPUSD is generally supportive of supplemental LCFF funding based on enrollment
instead of attendance, as proposed in SB 830 currently moving through the state legislature?
The City Council will consider supporting the bill at its meeting on June 7 and we are getting the agenda ready to
post. LAUSD is supportive of the bill, but we would like to confirm that you do not oppose the measure.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you!
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5305 -mbright@rpvca.gov
Connect with the City from your phone or tablet, download MyRPV.
This e--rnail messaqe nntains infonnaUon belonqinq to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be priv!lcqed, confidential and/or protected from
disclosure, The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity namccL Unauthorized disscrrnnation, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited.
you received this en,ail in error, or arc not an intended recipient, please notify the sender irnmediately, Thank you for your assistance and rnoperation,
From: McKenzie Bright
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 9:21 AM
To: Brenna Terrones <terronesb@pvpusd.net>
Subject: SB 830 -School Enrollment Funding
Good morning Brenna,
The RPV City Council will be considering taking a position on SB 830, currently moving through the state legislature. SB
830 would provide supplemental Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) funding to local educational agencies (LEAs)
2
based on a calculation of how much additional funding the LEA would receive if the student count methodology of the
LCFF were based on enrollment instead of attendance. I've attached a more detailed bill analysis.
The City Council is considering supporting the bill, but I wanted to check that PVPUSD would be supportive of an
enrollment-based funding supplement, in concept?
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
/310) 544-5305 -mbright@rpvca.gov
Connect with the City from your phone or tablet, download MyRPV.
This e mail messa9e rnnt,iins information belonging to the City of Ra11eho Palo:; Verdes, which may be privileqcd, confidential illKf/or protected from
disdosure. The information is intended only for use of the inclividu,;I or entity named. Urwuthoriz,id dissemination, distribution, or copyinq is strictly prohibited. If
you received this email in error, or are not an intended recipient, pleilse notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
3
Enyssa Momoli
From: McKenzie Bright
Sent:
To:
Monday, June 6, 2022 8:13 AM
CityClerk
Subject: FW: Roan Road /NBG Awards Considered by City Council on 6/7
Late correspondence item N.
From: McKenzie Bright
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 8:48 AM
To: jsh2003@cox.net
Cc: Lauren Ramezani <LaurenR@rpvca.gov>; mercedesmichelus@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Roan Road /NBG Awards Considered by City Council on 6/7
Hi Jodi,
You would be more than welcome to attend the meeting in person or virtually and/or provide comments during the
meeting, but it is not necessary. This email will be included as late correspondence, so your comments will be seen by
the City Council. If you would like to provide any additional comments you would also be welcome to email them.
Thank you!
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5305 -mbright@rpvca.gov
Connect with the City from your phone or tablet, download MYB.f'_\(_,
Tlii;; e mail m,;ssnge contains information belonging 1o the Ci1y of Rancho ralos Verdes, which may be privileged, confidentiill and/or protected from
disclosure. The information is intonclod only tor use of tbr' individual or entity narnc,d, Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copyinq is strictly prohibited. If
you received this email in error, or arc not an intended recipient, ploaso notify tho sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
From: jsh2003@cox.net <jsh2003@cox.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 8:36 AM
To: McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>
Cc: Lauren Ramezani <LaurenR@rpvca.gov>; mercedesmichelus@yahoo.com
Subject: Roan Road /NBG Awards Considered by City Council on 6/7
Good Morning,
On behalf of Roan Road, we sincerely appreciate your recommendation!
We look forward to beginning our project once we have your final award approval on 6/8.
1
Do you advise attending the meeting in person or virtually or no need at this point?
Thank you for your time and attention.
Jodi
From: McKenzie Bright <mBright(@rpvca.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 7:54 AM
Cc: Lauren Ramezani <LaurenR@rpvca.gov>
Subject: NBG Awards Considered by City Council on 6/7
Good morning,
Thank you for your participation in the City's Neighborhood Beautification Grant (NBG) Program. The City Council will be
considering awarding projects at its meeting on June 7, starting at 7pm.
The Staff Report, which includes award recommendations, is available at the following link. The complete agenda is
available at rpvca.gov/agendas.
After the City Council provides their direction, formal award letters will be sent on June 8.
If you would like to submit public comments to the City Council, you can email cc@rpvca.gov. If you would like to
participate during the meeting, you may:
• Attend in person at McTaggart Hall at Hesse park, or
• Participate virtually using Zoom. Please fill out the public participation form at rpvca.gov/participate/council
and indicate you would like to speak on item N.
Please let me or Public Works Senior Administrative Analyst Lauren Ramezani, cc'd, know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5305 -mbright@rpvca.gov
Connect with the City from your phone or tablet, download MY_RPV.
This c·mail message contains information belonging to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privileged, confidential ancl/or protected from
disclosure. The information is intended only for use of tho individual or entity named. Unauthorized dissemination, clistribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If
you received this email in error, or are not an intemfod recipient, please notify the'! sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
2
Fund
No.
101
101
330
681
682
202
203
209
211
213
214
215
216
217
220
221
222
223
224
225
228
310
331
332
333
334
336
337
338
340
343
285
795
Fund
Genera l ~und Ba lance
Restricted Amount (Policy Reserve)
General Fund Unrestricted Balance
Restricted by City Council Action
CIP
Equipment Replacement
Employee Pension Fund
Subtotal Restricted by City Council Action
Restricted by Low or External Agencies
Gas Tax
1972 Act
El Prado Lighting
1911 Act
Waste Reduction
Air Quality Management
Proposition C
Proposition A
Public Safety Grants
Measure R
Measure M
Habitat Restoration
Subregion 1 Maintenance
Measure A
Abalone Cove Sewer District
Donor Restricted Contributions
CDBG
Federal Grants
State Grants
ARPA
Quimby
Low-Mod Income Housing
Affordable Housing In Lieu
Environmental Excise Tax
Bikeways
Measure W
Improvement Authority {IA) Funds
IA Portuguese Bend
IA Abalone Cove
Subtotal Restricted by Law or External Agencies
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
FY 2022-23 FUND SUMMARY
FY2022-23 Estimated Resources
Estimated
Fund Balance
06/30/2022 Revenues Transfers In
28,338,235 35,727,000 300,000
(13 ,140,569)
15,197,666 35,727,000 300,000
37,183,150 200,000 6,359,700
2,381,672 313,800
640,000 400,000
40,204,822 513,800 6,759,700
1,390,861 2,160,700
29,325 200
39,737 200
1,665,463 808,000
269 ,08 4 194,600
151,123 55,500
509,299 846,800
1,609,538 1,023,900
103,005 151,200
1,821,860 640,400
148,478 1,316,300
286,672 12,400
747,815 14,000 50,000
101,636 90,200 -
157,321 52,000
814,341 43,300
90,055 60,000
1,104,000
7 100
4,309 ,800 4,952,600
701,520 10,000
315,431 31,600
880,011 4,300
90,758 22,400
28,000 110,000
662 ,627 682,000
68,642 300
1,074,9 77 3,300
18,067,386 14,390,300 50,000
, . : I I
FY2022-23 Estimated Appropriations
Transfers Ending Fund
Transfers Out Out Balance
Expenditures CIP Other 06/30/2023
30,47G,400 6,3~9,700 465,000 27,064,135
(15 ,238,200)
30,476,400 6,359,700 465,000 11,825,935
9,283,000 29,459,850
602,700 79,172
242,000 -798,000
10,127,700 -30,337,022
2,680,100 -871,461
-29,525
500 39,437
476,100 --1,997,363
254,300 -209 ,384
140,000 -66,623
900,000 --456,099
777,200 1,856,238
-250,000 4,205
1,400,000 -1,062,260
1,066,000 398,778
222,000 --77 ,072
43,600 768,215
50,000 141 ,836
208,800 -521
14,600 843,041
150,000 -55
105,000 -999,000
210,000 (209,893)
4,247,000 -5,015,400
711,520
347,031
-884,311
64,000 49,158
110,000 -28,000
596,000 748,627
49,000 19,942
28,000 1,05 0,2 77
13,742,200 -300,000 18,465,486
,.:., . I II :•i ir•
*E nding General Fund Balance includes transfer per City Council Reserve Policy ($889,500) and one-time transfer to Employee Pension Service Fund ($400,000)
**Estimated Ending Fund Balance for 6-30-2023 does not include any FY 2021-22 PO carry-over and continuing appropriations
\ .
STATEMENT OF REVENUES -ALL FUNDS
FY 2022-23
Estimated Budget Preliminary
Actuals Actuals Actuals Year-End Workshop Budget Draft Budget
Fund Description FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23
Genera l Fund __ 32,092,448 29,540,207 30,281,020 35,128,700 34,850,700 36,027,000 36,027,000
Administrative Overhead 169,356 149,507 99,507 100,000 155,700 155,700 155,700
Animal Licenses 31,365 26,734 28,803 28,800 28,900 27,400 27,400
Building & Safety Ad min Fe es (521) 559 (53) 1,000 1,000 1,000
Building & Safety Permits 1,152,758 954,408 1,050,030 1,800,000 1,500,000 1,710,000 1,710,000
Building & Safety SMIP 1,3G 7 977 (36 2) 2,900 300 2,800 2,800
Business License Penalty 12,501 20,505 6,184 14,400 13,000 13,000 13,000
Bus mess li ce nse Taxes 945,792 896,166 675,299 689,000 680,000 680,000 680,000
CASP Fees 7,604 5,635 5,360 4,500 4 ,500 4,500 4,500
Code Enforcement Citations 12,674 15,338 46,053 45,800 138,000 138,000 138,000
Donations 14,355 9,465 2,875 36,700 54,500 39,500 39,500
False Alarm 18,200 11,250 7,400 4,800 4,800 4,800 4 ,800
Federa l Grants 515,258
Film Permits 2,930 20,081 2,671 37,000 30,000 28,500 28,500
Franchise Taxes 2,149,743 2,146,037 2,203,130 2,150,000 2,150,000 2,150,000 2,150,000
Geology Permits 128,272 124,614 152,099 235,000 150,000 223,300 223,300
GolfTaxes 429,049 394,765 632,886 600,000 540,000 540,000 540,000
Interest Earnings 366,409 358,232 186,670 160,000 192,000 192,000 192,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 455,840 186,264 145,048 250,200 157,600 251,000 25 1,000
Parking Lot Fe es 215,341 237,209 417,037 220,000 230,000 260,000 260,000
Parking Permit Decals 988 590 594 600 600 600 600
Parking Permits-Overs ized Veh. 440 628 375 200 300 200 200
Plan Check Permits 393,433 335,342 307,328 530,000 445,000 503,500 503,500
Planning & Zoni ng Permits 401,764 330,124 362,786 485,000 445,000 460,800 460,800
Planning Investigation Fees 20,000
Planning Misc. Permits 7,769 7,848 8,622 8,000 8,000 7,600 7,600
Preserve Park Citation 200 100
Program/Event Fees 91,012 51 ,137 17,900 123,700 219,900 139,900 139,900
Property Tax 8,236,989 8,576,363 9,072,028 9,471,100 10,008,800 10,008,800 10,008,800
Prope rty Taxes -In Lieu of VLF 4,920,186 5,150,914 5,384,633 5,533,300 5,992,000 5,848,000 5,848,000
Property Ta xes -RPTTF RDA 50,255 55,594 54,130 54,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Property Transfer Tax 359,706 401,021 570,712 685,700 500,000 500,000 500,000
PVIC Sa les Taxable 137,551 92,494 12,840 99 ,500 120,000 120,000 120,000
RDA Administrative Fees 40,000 24,000
RDA Loan Repayment 139,938 114,494 239,062 154,400 283,800 283,800 283,800
Rental/Leases 518,728 388,006 324,180 472,200 416,800 514,100 514,100
ROW -Dumpster Permits 4,606 3,626 3,038 2,200 3,000 2,400 2,400
ROW -Misc Permits 74,329 106,186 76,205 123,000 95,000 99,800 99,800
Sa les Of Signs /Services 1,400 1,200
Sales Taxes 2,575,202 2,079,675 1,829,019 2,426,900 2,500,000 2,603,500 2,603,500
Sales Taxes (PSAF) 85,979 83,667 90,313 83,700 83 ,700 83,700 83,700
State Grants 1,359
Tow Fees 6,225 5,976 5,229 5,800 5,800 5,800 5,800
Traffic Tickets 91 ,460 95 ,301 199,353 61,800 112,000 112,000 112,000
Transfer -Measure A Ma int 90,000 100,000 150,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Tran sfe r -Public Safety 130,000 175,000 130,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
Tran sfer-Water Quality 72,384
Tr a nsie nt 0cc. Taxes -Misc 250,345 144,747 145,816 220,000 200,300 220,000 220,000
Transient 0cc . Taxes -Terran ea 5,395,152 3,765,052 2,969,619 5,530,100 5,071,400 5,530,100 5,530,100
Utility Users Taxes -Elec. 876,304 874,220 1,042,287 990,000 875,000 940,500 940,500
Utility Users Taxes -Gas 334,373 354,920 378,656 427,100 350,000 405,700 405,700
Utility Users Taxes -Water 706,430 683,230 824,882 900,000 700,000 855,000 855,000
View Restroration Permits 5,106 5,106 15,318 10,200 11,000 9,700 9,700
Gas Tax 1,812,817 __ 1,823,295 1,765,073 __ 1,950,600 2,160,700 2,160,700
Interest Earnings 7,466 21,853 5,548 5,400 5,400 5,400
Misce ll aneous Revenue 145,779 145,679 77,200
State Gas Ta x -SB l 837,064 737,134 773,632 862,500 949,200 949,200
State Grants 822,508 918,629 908,693 1,082,700 1,206,100 1,206,100
----
STATEMENT OF REVENUES -ALL FUNDS
FY 2022-23
Estimated Budget Preliminary
Actuals Actuals Actuals Year-End Workshop Budget Draft Budget
Fund Description FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23
1972 Act Landscape/light 541 501 240 200
Interest Earnings 541 501 240 200
i' Prado lighting District ---------'7,""9_8_2 ____ 8-',_0_79 _____ 7-',_8_83 ______ 2_00_
Interest Earnings 600 597 312 200
Property Tax 7,382 7,482 7,571
1911 Act Street lighting
Interest Earnings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Property Tax
______ 7_3_1-'---,9_8_5 ___ 958,138 __ 782,857 ___ 8_0__,6,_00_0 _
Beautification
Interest Earnings
Waste Reduction
Interest Earnings
State Grants
Waste Reduction Fees
Air Quality Management
Interest Earnings
Local Grants
Proposition C
Interest Earnings
Local Grants
Miscellaneous Revenue
Proposition A
Interest Earnings
Local Grants
Transfer -State Grants
_Public Safety G_ra_n_t_s _______ _
Interest Earnings
State Grants
37,878 24,346 12,912 13,000
208,102
694,107 725,690 769,945 793,000
10,000
10,000
263,66_6 ___ 268,_66_5 ___ 2_5_0,,__989 ___ 189,600
8,680
66,844
188,142
56,827
1,413
55,414
729,861
15,733
714,128
1,499,830
38,887
860,943
600,000
7,564
66,469
194,632
3,606
60,152
187,231
4,600
185,000
55,7_49 ____ 55---',_10_0 ____ 5_5~,5_0_0_
1,915 1,208 1,500
53,834 54,492 54,000
701,418
14,727
686,691
874,799
46,964
827,835
8,185
710,280
26,000
869,939
13,627
856,312
705,200
6,200
699,000
853,200
10,500
842,700
_1_5--'0,_86_3 ___ 1_5-'8,'---0_79 __ 157,786 ~800
2,116 2,131 1,059 1,200
148,747 155,948 156,727 157,600
Measure R -----~~-----569,889 533,060 544,634 534,300
Interest Earnings 34,139 18 ,778 11,186 10,000
local Grants 535,750 514,2 82 533,448 524,300
Measure M
Interest Earnings
Local Grants
604,922 580,618
1,365
603,557
1,877
578,741
Habitat Resto:..r..:.a..:.ti..:.o _n __________ 44_,_,7_5_3 ____ 4_3-'---,5_25
Interest Earnings 44,753 40,025
Miscellaneous Revenue 3,500
State Grants
Interest Earnings
Transfer -General Fund
Measure A Maintenance
Interest Earnings
Local Grants
Abalone Cove Sewer District
Interest Earnings
Transfer -Infrastructure
Property Ta x
14,969
14,969
88,282
1,648
86,634
57,079
6,407
50,672
48,442
13,442
35,000
94,466
503
93,963
970,05S
7,676
910,000
52,379
606,661
2,244
604,417
__ 3_0,892
30,892
16,298
6,298
10,000
153
153
54,025
2,045
51,980
596,000
1,800
594,200
12,400
44,000
14,000
30,000
190,200
200
190,000
52,000
2,000
50,000
200
200 200
200 200 ----200 200
__ so_8__,_,o_o_o ___ 808,ooo
13,000 13,000
795,000
194,600
4,600
190,000
55,500
1,500
54,000
6,200
840,600
10,500
1,013,400
151~
1,200
150,000
640,400
10,000
630,400
1,316,300
1,800
1,314,500
12,400
12,400
64,000
14,000
50,000
90,200
200
90,000
52,000
2,000
50,000
795,000
194,600
4,600
190,000
55,500
1,500
54,000
6,200
840,600
1,023,900
10,500
1,013,400
151,200
1,200
150,000
640,400
10,000
630,400
1,316,300
1,800
1,314,500
12,400
12 ,400
64,000
14,000
50,000
90,2~
200
90,000
52,000
2,000
50,000
STATEMENT OF REVENUES -ALL FUNDS
FY 2022-23
Estimated Budget Preliminary
Actuals Actuals Actuals Year-End Workshop Budget Draft Budget
Fund Description FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23
Ginsburg Cultural Art Bid 1,800 1,800
In terest Earnings 1,800 1,800
Donor Restricted Contribution 75,613 23,560 23,195 49,300 43,300 43,300
Donations 59,523 9,900 16,700 24,300 18,300 18,300
Interest Earnings 16,090 13,660 6,495 25,000 25,000 25,000
CDBG 178,591 226,364 115,063 144,800 ___ 60,000 60,000
Federal Grants 178,591 226,364 115,063 144,800 60,000 60,000
Capital Improvement Fund 7,306,458 --3,078,825 1,935,958 2,753,000 4,959,700 6,559,700
Federal Grants 5,007
Interest Earnings 508,963 471,473 214,382 200,000 200,000 200,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 757
Tran sfe r -Federal Grants 2,490,636 196,600
Transfer -General Fund 4,301,852 2,410,752 1,720,819 2,553,000 4,759,700 6,359,700
Federal Grants 143,442 ---2,000 1,104,000 1,104,000
Federal Grants 141,4 42 1,104,000 1,104,000
Interest Earnings 2,000 2,000
1,709,965 1,826,179 44,850 100 100
Interest Earnings 100 100 100
State Grants 1,709,965 1,826,179 44,850
Federal Grants-ARPA 4,987,400 4,952,600 4,952,600 -----Federal Grants 4,967,400 4,932,600 4,932,600
Interest Earnings 20,000 20,000 20,000
Quimby Park Development 135,272 __ lo,000 10,000 10,000
Developer Fees 102,000 23,652
Interest Earnings 33,272 23,090 9,861 10,000 10,000 10,000
Low-Moderate Income Housing 124,340 118,261 148,010 31,600 31,600
Interest Earnings 2,956 3,237 1,845 1,600 1,600 1,600
Property Taxes -RPTTF RDA 34,984 28,624 59,765 30,000 30,000 30,000
RDA Loan Repayment 86,400 86,400 86,400
Affordable Housing Proje~ 15,9~ 17,290 19,584 4,300 4,300 4,300
Interest Earnings 15,961 14,846 7,143 4,300 4,300 4,300
Miscellaneous Revenue 2,444 12,441
Environmental Excise Tax 48,419 122,132 6,177 19,400
Developer Fees 39,020 114,694 3,902 17,000 20,000 20,000
Interest Earnings 9,399 7,438 2,275 2,400 2,400 2,400
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access 511 28,000 110,000 110,000
Local Grants 511 28,000 110,000 110,000
MeasureW 679,381 683,800 682,000 682,000
Interest Earnings 2,000 2,000 2,000
Local Grants 679,381 681,800 680,000 680,000
-Water Quality/Flood Protection 200,000
State Grants 200,000
Equipment Repl acement 351,159 131,736 114,965 330,400 303,800 _ 313,800
Equipment Replacement Charges 300,900 84,600 93,600 310,400 283,800 283,800
Interest Earnings 50,259 46,686 21,365 20,000 20,000 30,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 450
Employee Pension Service Fun.!!_ 640,600 400,600 400,000
Interest Earnings 600 600
Transfer -General Fund 640,000 400,000 400,000
IA Portuguese Bend Maintenance 3,451 2,136 425 200 300
IA Abalone Cove Maintenance 29,100 26,260 6,309 3,000 3,300
Grand Total 49,171,185 42,441,789 39,308,065 51,300,300 -56,127,800 57,740,800
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES -ALL FUNDS
FY 2022-23
Estimated Budget Preliminary
Actuals Actuals Actuals Year-End Workshop Budget Draft Budget
General Fund FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23
Transfers Out
Transfe rs Out
Ci Council
City Co un ci l
Lega l Services
Legal Services -City Admi n
Public Safety
Sheriff's Con tract
Specia l Programs
City Admin istration
City Cle r k Ad m i ni strati o n
Cit y Cle r k Election
City Manager
Co m m unity Outre ach
Emerge ncy Preparedness
Human Reso urces
Inform atio n Technology-Data
Informat ion Tec_h no logy -Voice
RPVtv
EOC
Em ergency Ope ra tion Cen t er
Finance
Finan ce Admin ist ration
Public Works
Building Mainte nance
Fuel Modifica tion
Pa rks Mainte na nce
Publ ic Works Ad m inistration
Sewer Maintenance
Stor m Water Quality
St reet La ndscape Maintenance
Traffic Sa fety
Tr ail s & Open Space Ma int
Ve hicles M ai ntenance
Community Development
Anima l Control
Building & Sa f ety
Code Enforcement
Co mmunity Development Ad m i n
Geology
Nccp
Pl anning
V iew Restoration
Recreation and Parks
Abalone Cove Sho reline Park
City Run Sports & Activities
Co ntrac t Classes
Eastview Pa r k
Fred Hesse Jr. Pa r k
Lad era Lind a Co mmunity Center
Open Space M anageme nt
Othe r Recreationa l Fa cilit ies
Parking Enforcement
Po int Vicent e Inte r . Center
Preserve Park Rangers
Reac h
Rec reation & Pa rks Ho ldi ng
Rec rea tio n Administratio n
Robert E. Ryan Park
Special Eve nts & Programs
Su pport Services
Vol unteer Progra m
Non-Department
Non-Depart m ental
4 ,346,852
4,346,8S2
96,252
96,252
1,171,414
1,171,414
7,118,805
6,335,382
783,423
2,914,410
448,394
1,338
79 1,7S8
62,246
103,418
302,S44
928,88S
96,277
179,SS0
1,502,164
1,502,164
5,191,137
453,630
585,192
2,155,3 12
22,SS0
53 5,9 20
573,8S0
418,941
404,280
41,462
3,039,196
82,061
826,227
184,4S7
670,902
107,253
11,445
83S,016
321,835
2,687,330
135,17S
3,06S
41,695
7,3 S4
187,973
86,409
235,72 1
64,46S
513,420
69,328
1,0 26,906
92,391
194,344
29,084
1,133,906
1,133,906
2,550,752 1,750,819
2,5S0,7S2 1,7S0,819
89,739 84,681
89,739 84,681
1,133,168 886,407
1,133,168 886,407
7,335,482 7,233,951
6,683,678 6,970,901
651 ,804 263,0S0
3,081,690 2,721,361
424,365 392 ,362
298,089 9,S66
645,233 628,592
63,4 1S 82,978
24,S63 16,829
364,038 309,885
97S,S70 979,00S
103,792 117,369
182,62S 184,77S
404,281 322,0SG
404,281 322,0S6
1,634,788 1,458,001
1,634,788 1,458,001
5,714,008 4,646,168
448,644 477,391
1,041,109 41 5,389
726,663 618,404
2,092,58S 1,934,34 6
42,278 22,830
479,833 472,168
147,382 232,493
276,284 120,SSB
421,32S 306,370
37,90S 46,2 19
2,857,235 2,623,915
102,083 94,282
678,640 598,490
222,3 19 208,263
S84,244 S28,887
11 1,100 144,068
47,284
774,259 61 6,938
384,S90 38S,703
2,533,171 2,650,848
129,636 137,950
3,16S 400
33,717 1,890
52,684 65,572
180,952 174,9 18
67,534 74,828
198,816 179,058
10,251 2,S69
457,537 427,698
145,827 272,887
20,789 43,008
686
964,028 990,768
8 1,168 109,586
160,SS0 141,020
2 1,195 23,310
S,322 4,700
1,204,534 1,814,562
1,204,534 1,8 14,S62
5,008,100 4,766,000 5,224,700 6,824,700
5,008,100 4,766,000 S,224,700 6,824,700
97,500 110,700 110,700 110,700
97,500 110,700 11 0,700 11 0,700
934,100 9S0,OO0 950,000 950,000
9 34,100 950,000 9S0,000 9S0,000
7,504,130 7,627,700 7,627,700 7,627,700
7,150,200 7,2S4,000 7,2S4,000 7,2S4,000
3S3,930 373,700 373,700 373,700
2,895,236 3,523,800 3,653,100 3,653,100
399,100 473 ,100 5 11,500 511,500
154,300 1S4,30 0 154,300
683,500 768,400 823,000 823,000
69,800 73,400 73,400 73,400
97,761 2 10,800 210,800 210,800
344,2 15 437,000 473,300 473,300
971,760 1,0S5,700 1,055,700 1,055,700
120,500 131,000 131,000 131,000
208,600 22 0,100 220,100 220,100
194,000
194,000
1,345,300 1,491,500 1,491,500 1,491,500
1,345,300 1,491,500 1,491,S00 1,491,S00
4,925,872 6,021,200 6,471,200 6,471,200
S04,975 S28,2S0 528,250 S28,2S0
540,000 6S0,400 6S0,400 6S0,400
759,432 847,200 8 47,200 847,200
2,071,800 2,939,700 2,939,70 0 2,939,700
28,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
36,190 1,000 1,000 1,000
188,000 213,000 663,000 663,000
324,37S 364,S00 364,S00 364,500
417,600 379,150 379,150 379,150
5S,S00 63,000 63,000 63,000
3,195,700 4,122,300 4,132,300 4,125,300
166,000 295,000 295,000 288,000
6 51,200 866,80 0 866,800 866,800
263,000 272,400 272,400 272,400
678,500 813,600 823,60 0 823,600
150,0 00 150,000 1S0,000 1S0,000
918,200 1,334,100 1,334,100 1,334,100
368,800 390,400 390,400 390,400
3,178,100 3,663,800 3,773,800 3,773,800
119,300 213,100 213,100 213,100
11,500 11,S00 11,S00
4 6,000 6 S,000 6S,000 6S,000
71,800 84,400 84,400 84,400
150,000 213,600 213,600 2 13,600
131,800 58,700 58,700 58,700
179,300 193,300 238,30 0 238,300
1,800
108,S00 108,300 108,300 108,300
459,700 470,500 470,500 470,S00
343,700 389,300 389,300 389,300
70,900 72,000 72,000 72,000
1,051,900 1,2 61,300 1,276,300 1,276,300
94,600 120,200 120,200 120,200
322,300 369,300 4 19,300 419,300
21,500 28,300 28,300 28,300
S,0 00 5,000 S,000 5,000
3,311,200 2,213,100 2,273,100 2,273,100
3,311 ,200 2,213,100 2,273,100 2,273,100
Total -General Fund 29,201,466 28,538,848 26,192,769 32,589,238 34,490,100 35,708,100 37,301,100
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES -ALL FUNDS
FY 2022-23
Other Funds: Estimated Budget Preliminary
Special Revenues and Actuals Actuals Actuals Year-End Workshop Budget Draft Budget
Internal Service Funds FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23
Gas Tax 830,S51 1,085,396 2,599,346 1,101,500 1,700,000 2,680,100 2,680,100
Fuel Modification 24,750
Landslide 48,867 15,438
Street Improvements
Street Landscape Maintenance 508,460 634,391 735,320 615,000 715,100 715,100
Street Pavement Maintenance 256,454 128,232 197,753 265,000 265,000 265,000
Traffic Management 16,770 12,506 23,903 100,000
Right-of-Way Improvements 285,517 1,626,932 121,500 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,700,000
El Prado Lighting District 594 500 500
Operating
Repair & Maintenance Services 594 500 500
1911 Act Street Lighting 1,393,S44 970,976 828,970 541,200 476,100 476,100
Administration 425,203 347,597 315,110 316,100 321,100 321,100
Capital
Parks Improvement
Repair & Maintenance Services 106,026 114,129 145,450 209,000 155,000 155,000
Street Lights Maintenance 147,888
Right-of-Way Imp rovements 714,427 509,250 368,410 16,100
Beautification 378,754
Capita l
Right-of-Way Improvements 378,754
Waste Reduction 212,991 223,78S 224,461 357,600 254,300 254,300
Administration 150,968 131,200 155,410 187,100 142,800 142,800
Repair & Maintenance Services 62,023 92,585 69,051 170,500 111,500 111,500
Air Quality Management 50,000 55,839 57,000 140,000 140,000
Repair & Maintenance Services 55,839 57,000 140,000 140,000
Transit Programs 50,000
Proposition A 749,753 1,236,694 1,338,029 793,000 777,200 777,200
Administration 705,645 777,958 874,187 793,000 777,200 777,200
Street Improvements
Right-of-Way Improvements 44,108 458,736 463,842
Proposition C 639,011 698,806 759,078 696,800 700,000 900,000 900,000
Adm ini st ration
Repair & Maintenance Serv ice s
Street Maintenance 572,312 674,953 649,820 436,700 700,000 900,000 900,000
Right-of-Way Improvements 66,699 23,853 109,258 260,100
Public Safety Grants 130,000 175,000 130,000 160,000 250,000 250,000
Transfers 130,000 175,000 130,000 160,000 250,000 250,000
Measure R 2,254,152 72,167 427,417 93,700 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000
Capita l
Street Improvements 3,892 157,593 29,200
Traffic Management
Right-of-Way Improvements 2,254,152 68,275 269,824 64,500 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000
Measure M 565,972 525,317 414,190 739,000 1,066,000 1,066,000
Repair & Maintenance Services 565,972 525,317 414,190 739,000 681,000 681,000
Right-of-Way Improvements 385,000 385,000
Habitat Restoration 149,499 152,745 153,618 393,700 222,000 222,000
Administration 129,803 133,045 139,248 353,100 180,000 180,000
Repair & Maintenance Services 19,696 19,700 14,370 40,600 42,000 42,000
Subregion One Maintenance 43,831 42,530 42,116 41,600 43,600 43,600
Repair & Maintenance Services 43,831 42,530 42,116 41,600 43,600 43,600
Measure A Maintenance 90,000 100,000 150,000 50,000 50,000
Transfers 90,000 100,000 150,000 50,000 50,000
Abalone Cove Sewer District 49,926 138,010 94,903 142,800 208,800 208,800
Administration 16,358 42,380 34,678 38,800 108,800 108,800
Cap ital
Repair & Maintenance Services 33,568 95,630 60,225 104,000 100,000 100,000
Sewer Maintenance
Ginsburg Cultural Art Bid 86,344 1,045
Administration 86,344 1,045
Donor Restricted Contribution 168,942 16,770 26,608 13,500 14,600 14,600
Adm inistration 23,744 9,106 20,989 5,500 6,600 6,600
Parks Improvement 7,659
Repair & Maintenance Services 7,515 7,664 5,619 8,000 8,000 8,000
Unassigned 130,024
CDBG 193,587 211,806 29,908 79,400 150,000 150,000 150,000
Administration 3,008
Capital
Right-of-Way Improvements 193,587 211,806 26,900 79,400 150,000 150,000 150,000
Capital Infrastructure Program 3,291,424 4,652,909 889,717 1,691,000 11,118,000 9,283,000 9,283,000
ADA Improvements 77,000 33,950 30,000
Administration 14,274
Altamira Canyon 81,151 155,100
Building Improvements 590,000 590,000 590,000
Capital
Catch Basin 14,992
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES -ALL FUNDS
FY 2022-23
Other Funds: Estimated Budget Preliminary
Special Revenues and Actuals Actuals Actuals Year-End Workshop Budget Draft Budget
Internal Service Funds FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23
Civic Center
Coasta l Bluff
Facilities Asset Management
Landslide Improvements
landslide Maintenance
Parks Improvement
Pavement Program
Repair & Maintenance Services
Sewer Improvements
Sewer Maintenance
Storm Drain
Street Improvements
Street Maintenance
Trail Improvements
Transfers
Ladera Linda Commun ity Park
Right-of-Way Improvements
Open Space Improvements
Traffic Signs
State Grants
Administration
Capital
Parks Improvement
Storm Drain
Transfers
Right-of-Way Improvements
Federa l Grants
Administration
Transfers
Right-of-Way Improvements
Federa l Grants -ARPA
ADA Improvements
Building Improvements
Emergency Preparedness
Parks Improvement
Technology Improvements
Ladera Linda Community Park
Right-of-Way Improvements
Parks Improvements
Sewer & Storm Drain Improvements
Quimby Park Deve lopment
Capital
Parks Improvement
Trail Improvements
Ladera Linda Commun ity Park
En vironmental Excise Tax
Street Landscape Ma intenance
Bicycle/Pedestrian Access
Street Improvements
Street Maintenance
Right-of-Way Improvements
MeasureW
Repair & Maintenance Services
Unassigned
Water Quality/Flood Protection
Administration
Storm Drain
Equipment Replacement
Capital
Operating
Equipment Replacement
Employee Pension Fund
Operating
58,649
216,621
179,114
46,239
84,687
6,714
239,940
37,132
151,985
2,193,343
708,061
144,320
244,265
300,000
19,476
1,087,318
1,087,318
145,474
3,470
142,004
811,110
811,110
363,224
363,224
2,798 3,301
293,304
304,026
71,924 32,985
35,213
34,639 6,652
334,890 27,111
283,423 21,646
6,985 19,435
50,349
3,530,069 309,509
277,373 49,207
120,832 11 ,621
156,541 37,586
98,314
14
98,300
545,813 130,863
364,464
181,349 130,863
286,881 143,635
286,881 143,635
511
511
187,954
187,954
341,054 188,543
4,918 1,623
336,136 186,920
86,300
82,800
72,200
8,300
7,100
12,100
1,220,400
46,700
116,400
100,000
16,400
672,600
42,800
12,000
617,800
389,500
389,500
138,000
138,000
512,635
454,635
58,000
354,000
50,000
224,000
80,000
535,000
1,060,000
3,300,000
4,643,000
775,000
215,000
l0S,000
105,000
4,247,000
350,000
2,512,000
350,000
1,035,000
565,000
1,060,000
3,300,000
3,343,000
210,000
215,000
210,000
210,000
l0S,000
105,000
4,247,000
350,000
2,512,000
350,000
1,035,000
64,000
64,000
110,000
110,000
596,000
535,000
61,000
602,700
88,300
214,400
300,000
242,000
242,000
565,000
1,060,000
3,300,000
3,343,000
210,000
215,000
210,000
210,000
105,000
105,000
4,247,000
350,000
2,512,000
350,000
1,035,000
64,000
64,000
110,000
110,000
S96,000
535,000
61,000
602,7 00
88,300
214,400
300,000
242,000
242,000
Total -Other Funds 14,394,062 11,853,391 8,714,913 9,234,935 19,420,000 24,092,900 24,092,900
IA Portuguese Bend Maintenance
IA Abalo ne Cove Maintenance
78,333
39,631
54,043
20,509
4S,0Sl
28,694
46,000
34,000
49,000
28,000
Total -All Funds 43,713,492 40,466,791 34,981,427 41,904,173 53,910,100 59,801,000 61,471,000
Enyssa Momoli
From: Teresa Takaoka
Sent:
To:
Friday, June 3, 2022 9:16 AM
CityClerk
Subject: FW: AB Cove Sewer fee
LC
From: Ron Dragoo <RonD@rpvca.gov>
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 3:51 PM
To: Teresa Takaoka <TeriT@rpvca.gov>
Subject: FW: AB Cove Sewer fee
Teri,
Here following is late correspondence for the Abalone cove Sewer Public Hearing on June 7, 2022.
Ron Dragoo, PE
Principal Engineer
Some members of the City's workforce are working remotely during this time. Inquiries will continue to be reviewed on a
daily basis. Please be patient with us as there may be delays or minor inconveniences in responding to your inquiry.
From: Jim Knight <knightjim33@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 9:38 AM
To: Ron Dragoo <RonD@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Re: AB Cove Sewer fee
Thanks Ron. I think we're saying the same thing just in a different way. A separation from a percentage increase of the
fee versus additional revenue from new hook ups.
Jim
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:28 AM Ron Dragoo <RonD@rpvca.gov> wrote:
Hi Jim,
I am not sure that your summary is correct, and I think it leaves a question that would still need to be answered. A
clearer explanation would be -the City is recommending increasing the annual sewer service charge by 7% for all
properties connected to the system, and because there were two new properties connected to the system during
FY2021-22, the revenue anticipated to be received this year is 8.02% move than the revenue received last year.
1
The thing to be careful of is mixing the year to year revenue (which is based on the total number of connections to the
system) versus the increase to the rate payers (which is consistent for each rate payer regardless of the number of rate
payers).
Ron Dragoo, PE
Principal Engineer
Some members of the City's workforce are working remotely during this time. Inquiries will continue to be reviewed on a
daily basis. Please be patient with us as there may be delays or minor inconveniences in responding to your inquiry.
From: Jim Knight <knightjim33@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 4:39 PM
To: Ron Dragoo <RonD@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Re: AB Cove Sewer fee
Thanks for getting back to me. If I understand your answer it appears that the 7% and 8.02% are talking about
apples and oranges. The percentage RATE of increase from 2012-22 fees is capped at 7% for everyone by
ordinance. The TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT has increased by 1.02% because two properties were added giving
a total of $60,074.08 of total dollar amount of sewer fee revenue to the City (7% + 1.02% added revenue
from new properties).
Do I understand correctly?
Jim
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 2:56 PM Ron Dragoo <RonD@rpvca.gov> wrote:
Hi Jim,
This is a good question -let me know if the following makes sense:
2
The staff report discusses a 8.02% overall increase in revenues as compared to last year's revenues. This happened
because two additional properties were added to the rolls increasing the total revenues over last year's total
revenue. The staff report and the notice sent to property owners states the recommended increase is 7% which
is consistent with the 7% cap and we are recommending increasing the rates by 7%.
The recommended rates are consistent for all participants in the sewer system. It doesn't matter if a property owner
is recently connected or has been connected for years. The 7% cap is specific to increasing the rate, the rate can only
be increased up to 7% in a single year based on Municipal Code section 13.06.030.
Property owners are not being asked to participate at a rate greater than that allowed through the ordinance cap of
7%.
The calculation that reveled the 8.02% is as follows
Total Annual Charge 2021-22 (Revenue Last year)= $55,253.24
Total Annual Charge 2022-23 (Total expected Revenue this year)= $60,074.08
The equation is $60,074.08-55,253.24 /$60,074.08=8.02%
Ron Dragoo, PE
Principal Engineer
Some members of the City's workforce are working remotely during this time. Inquiries will continue to be reviewed on a
daily basis. Please be patient with us as there may be delays or minor inconveniences in responding to your inquiry.
From: Jim Knight <knightjim33@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 1:15 PM
To: Ron Dragoo <RonD@rpvca.gov>
Subject: AB Cove Sewer fee
3
Ron,
I have a question regarding the increase in the sewer fee for Abalone Cove.
In the staff report it stated that the increase will be 8.02% when the notice sent out to homeowners stated it
will be raised 7%. There were no protests based upon the notice sent because it was within the 7% cap.
What happened?
The staff report stated that there were two parcels developed and added to the sewer system. Are they
excluded from the original 7% CPI cap? Is there a dual accounting system now with the original
homeowners that signed on to the sewer system at a 7% cap and new owners are not part of the
agreement? Or do all of the original sewer homeowners have to suck up increases beyond the 7% cap as
new owners hookup?
The staff report was not clear.
I would appreciate an explanation to share with other homeowners in the community.
Thanks,
Jim Knight
4
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Noel Park <noelparkone@gmail.com>
Wednesday, June 1, 2022 8:55 AM
CC; Ara Mihranian
Council Agenda for 6/7 /22, Item 7
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
I strongly support the proposal to have the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy operate the Hatano property as a
native plant nursery. Among other things, it will be a huge help in the restoration of the nearby property whose
acquisition you have recently so wisely agreed to facilitate.
This is a VERY smart move. I congratulate you for it.
Noel Park
6715 El Rodeo Road
Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275
Sent from my iPhone
1 7