20211207 Late CorrespondenceCITYOF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
TO:
FROM:
HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
CITY CLERK
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2021
SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA
Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material presented
for tonight's meeting.
Item No. Description of Material
Non-Agenda Email from Mickey Radich
1 Updated Attachment A Resolution
4 Email from Dave Emenhiser
5 Updated Redistricting Maps
** PLEASE NOTE: Materials attached after the color page(s) were submitted
through Monday, December 6, 2021**.
cl;?~d,
Teresa Takaoka
L:\LATE CORRESPONDENCE\202112021 Coversheets\20211207 additions revisions to agenda.docx
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Late corr
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:09 PM
CityClerk
FW: Item Not On The Agenda: City Newsletter
From: Mickey Radich <mickeyrodich@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 20211:31 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Item Not On The Agenda: City Newsletter
I would like to discuss our City's Newsletter articles on the new Ladera
Linda Park. I thought our City staff and City Council prided itself on being
transparent with the public and especially with our residents. In reading
the latest Newsletter, there is another glowing article praising the new
Ladera Linda Park. The same has happened in all previous
Newsletter articles, they praised the new Ladera Linda Park.
But something has been completely missing in each and every article,
some very important numbers. This park has a usable floor space of
around 7,600 square feet and an initial cost estimate of $15.7 million and
rising. No where in these articles do I see these very important numbers
that should be given to our residents and included in each newsletter. As
a matter of fact, any increase or decrease in the estimated cost should
also be highlighted as well.
It is unfortunate that this project was approved by our City Council
without any budget whatsoever.Of course, as staff has stated they are
too busy to give our City Council current updates on any cost variations.I
asked this question of our City manager and his answer was that he did
not want to tip off any prospective bidders for this project on how much
RPV was willing to spend. I am willing to bet that the vast majority of our
1
residents, who are actually paying for this new park, are not even aware
of these important numbers
This all leads up to another upcoming project, namely the proposed
new Civic Center.This project has been under discussion for a few years
without a budget and if this continues as "standard operating
procedure", our residents will not know what the estimated costs will be,
either. I guess it will be handled the same as the new Ladera Linda Park.
2
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING REVISION "F" TO THE
APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 55, AMENDING
CONDITION NO. 6 TO ALLOW, WITH CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL, BURIALS ON THE ROOFTOP OF INSPIRATION
SLOPE MAUSOLEUM FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 27501 S.
WESTERN AVENUE (GREEN HILLS MEMORIAL PARK).
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2007, the Planning Commission adopted P.C. Resolution
No. 2007-32, certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopted P.C. Resolution
No. 2007-33, approving amendments to the Conditional Use Permit No. 155 for the Green
Hills Master Plan, which called for development of the Green Hills Memorial Park ("Green
Hills") over the following 30 to 50 years, and allowed grading and mausoleum buildings
to be constructed at various specified locations throughout Green Hills cemetery; and,
WHEREAS, on November 25, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted an
annual review and adopted P.C. Resolution No. 2008-47, approving a revision to the
Master Plan at Green Hills cemetery; and,
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2014, following complaints by the Vista Verde
Condominium Association regarding the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum
building in Area 11, the Planning Commission conducted an annual review of Conditional
Use Permit No. 155 and tentatively agreed to impose a 90-day moratorium on all ground
burials and interments on the rooftop of the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum
while Staff identified new or revised conditions to address specific noise, visual, and
privacy impacts identified by the Planning Commission based on public testimony, and
continued the public hearing to March 11, 2014; and,
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2014, the Planning Commission continued the public
hearing to April 22, 2014, and again on May 13, 2014, August 12, 2014, and August 26,
2014, to allow Green Hills and the Vista Verde Condominium Association to continue their
discussions regarding the existing Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum; and,
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2014, the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing and unanimously agreed to impose specific operational conditions on Green Hills
to minimize impacts from burial activity involving the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace
Mausoleum and continued the public hearing to November 11, 2014; and,
WHEREAS, on November 11, 2014, the Planning Commission adopted P.C.
Resolution No. 2014-29, imposing a moratorium on future burials and sales of burial plots
on the rooftop of the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum building located in
Area 11 of the Master Plan; a moratorium on above-ground burials within the 5-foot
setback area along the western property line in the area south of the Pacifica Mausoleum
building; directing Green Hills to submit a Variance application within 30 days to allow
Resolution No. 2021-;·
Page 1 of 36 •
specific structures/interments that are located in setbacks to remain and imposing new
conditions on the cemetery to avoid/minimize impacts to the adjoining neighbors from
burial activity on the roof of the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum building in
Area 11 of the Green Hills Master Plan; and,
WHEREAS, on November 25, 2014, Ellen Berkowitz of Gresham, Savage Nolan
& Tilden filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council on
behalf of Green Hills Memorial Park, seeking to overturn the entirety of the Planning
Commission's decision; and,
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2015, the City Council continued the public hearing,
then again on September 1, 2015, and September 15, 2015, directing Staff to prepare a
resolution upholding the Planning Commission's action; and,
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
2015-102, upholding in part and modifying in part the Planning Commission's decision
approving the compliance review for the Green Hills Cemetery and allowing the
mausoleum building in Area 11 to remain in accordance with its 2007 approvals and
permits and revising certain conditions of approval, and amending the Green Hills
Cemetery Master Plan; and,
WHEREAS, no Annual Compliance Review was conducted for 2015 since the
2014 Annual Review commenced on February 25, 2014, and extended through
November 17, 2015; and,
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2016, the City Council received and filed an agreement
that allowed Green Hills to store buried concrete vaults on the roof of the Inspiration Slope
Mausoleum and required that Green Hills submit for authorization for burials to either the
Director or the Planning Commission, as that was the procedure as detailed in the CUP
conditions of approval at that time; and,
WHEREAS, on January 31, 2017, the City Council conducted the 2016 annual
review and adopted Resolution No. 2017-03, approving revisions to the Conditions of
Approval as part of the 2016 Annual Review for the Green Hills Conditional Use Permit,
which included an updated requirement for all rooftop interments to be heard by the City
Council; and,
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2018, the City Council conducted the 2017 annual
review and adopted Resolution No. 2018-07, approving revisions to the Conditions of
Approval as part of the 2017 Annual Review for the Green Hills Conditional Use Permit;
and,
WHEREAS, on March 19, 2019, the City Council conducted the 2018 annual
review and found that Green Hills was in compliance with the Conditions of Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No. 55; and,
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 2 of 36
WHEREAS, on January 21, 2020, the City Council conducted the 2019 annual
review and adopted Resolution No. 2020-03, approving revisions to the Conditions of
Approval as part of the 2019 Annual Review for the Green Hills Conditional Use Permit,
which included the requirement that any rooftop burials at Inspiration Slope Mausoleum
be reviewed by the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, on March 2, 2021, the City Council conducted the 2020 annual review
and found that Green Hills was in compliance with the Conditions of Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No. 55; and,
WHEREAS, on October 8, 2021, Green Hills submitted a request to begin utilizing
previously installed concrete vaults for burial on the rooftop of the Inspiration Slope
Mausoleum, which requires City Council review and approval pursuant to Condition No.
6.c of Resolution No. 2020-03; and,
WHEREAS, on November 16, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed
public hearing, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard
and present evidence. During the meeting, the City Council voiced concerns about how
the request may impact the neighboring properties, and continued the public hearing to
the December 7, 2021 meeting, to allow for the project to be re-noticed as a Conditional
Use Permit Revision, and to allow any interested City Council members an opportunity to
visit the site to better understand the proximity and potential effects of burials on the
Inspiration Slope Mausoleum rooftop to the nearest adjacent residential neighborhood;
and,
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2021, a public notice for the proposed Conditional
Use Permit Revision was mailed to owners of property within a 500-foot radius of the
subject site, to persons requesting notice, to all affected homeowners associations, and
to the property owner in accordance with Rancho Palos Verdes Code Section 17.80.090,
and published in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News pursuant to the requirements of the
Rancho Palos Verdes Zoning Code; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on December 7,
2021, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and
present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: CEQA Findings. Pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et. seq. ("CEQA"),
the State's CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et.
seq., the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65962.5(f)
(Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement), this decision by the City Council (i)
constitutes minor modification to the existing Conditions of Approval of the Green Hills
Master Plan Conditional Use Permit; and (ii) will not have a significant effect on the
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 3 of 36
environment. Therefore, this decision is not subject to CEQA pursuant to California Code
of Regulations Sections 15061 (b)(2), and 15301.
Section 2: Municipal Code Findings for Modifications to Conditions. This is a de
nova hearing where the City Council has considered the evidence before it. The City
Council finds that this use dates back to 1948 and was annexed to the City in 1984 with
the original Master Plan approved in 1991, revised Master Plan approved in 2007 and
which has been updated from time to time, an Annual Review commenced in 2014 was
approved with modified conditions in 2015, an Annual Review approved with modified
conditions in 2017, an annual review approved with modified conditions in 2018, an
annual review approved with modified conditions in 2020, and the most recent annual
review approved in 2021 . There is no expansion of the use beyond the Revised Master
Plan, and additional conditions have been imposed to minimize impacts to surrounding
properties and protect community health, safety, and general welfare. The changes to the
conditions being proposed do not affect the validity of the findings made in Resolution No.
2020-03. Accordingly, the Council finds:
A. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed
use and for all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping and other
features required by this title or by conditions imposed under this section to
integrate said use with those on adjacent land and within the neighborhood. To
wit:
Green Hills Memorial Park's entrance is located at 27501 Western Avenue in the
northeast corner of the City, bordering the City of Lomita, the City of Rolling Hills
Estates, and the City of Los Angeles. The property is approximately 121 acres in size,
and is a privately owned and operated cemetery facility. Approximately 1,800 burials
occur annually at the cemetery. The site is, therefore, of a size and shape that allows
its use as a cemetery facility, including all required setbacks, landscaping and other
features. The entrance is sufficient to accommodate traffic into and out of the
cemetery.
The cemetery abuts residential properties to the north and south, a church complex
and reservoir land to the west, and residential and land that is currently under
development to the east (site of the Highpark/Ponte Vista residential development),
across Western Avenue. The use of the property is thus consistent with surrounding
uses and the adjacent neighborhood as a low-density development.
B. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways sufficient
to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. To wit:
Green Hills Memorial Park has been in existence at this location since 1948. Its main
entrance is located on Western Avenue, a major thoroughfare that accommodates the
amount of vehicular traffic to and from the cemetery. The proposed changes to the
conditions will not negatively affect the traffic on Western Avenue as Western Avenue
will be sufficient to handle any additional traffic that may be created by the proposed
amendment, which allows burials on the rooftop of the Inspiration Slope Mausoleum.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 4 of 36
Furthermore, no additional construction or grading is required for this request, as the
vaults for burials were installed when the Inspiration Slope Mausoleum was
constructed.
C. That, in approving the subject use at the specific location, there will be no
significant adverse effects on adjacent property or the permitted use thereof.
To wit:
The conditions imposed m1rnm1ze impacts on neighboring properties. Conditions
address, among other issues: parking, grading, noise, landscaping, setbacks,
mitigation monitoring, Master Plan compliance reviews, dust, emissions by
construction vehicles and equipment, construction, dirt storage, lighting, employee
training and complaints, trash and debris, storage of equipment and supplies, fences,
signage, and storm water mitigation. This is further described in Finding E below.
D. That the proposed use is not contrary to the general plan. To wit:
Green Hills Memorial Park and any proposed burials within the site, including those
on the rooftop of the Inspiration Slope Mausoleum are consistent with the General
Plan's Cemetery zoning designation of the site, and with the types of land uses
permitted within the Development Code's Cemetery land use designation. Further, the
provision for additional burial space on the site may help to serve the cultural and
social needs of the residents.
E. That conditions regarding any of the requirements listed in this Section,
which the City Council finds to be necessary to protect the health, safety, and
general welfare, have been imposed. To wit:
a. Setbacks and buffers;
b. Fences or walls;
c. Lighting;
d. Vehicular ingress and egress;
e. Noise, vibration, odors and similar emissions;
f. Landscaping;
g. Maintenance of structures, grounds, or signs;
h. Service roads or alleys; and
i. Such other conditions as will make possible development of the City in an orderly
and efficient manner and in conformity with the intent and purposes set forth in this
title.
Some minor changes to the conditions of approval are proposed as part of the current
project, which will also meet the intent of this condition.
Section 4: Modification of Conditions. Attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' are
conditions governing this use, both existing and modified conditions, all incorporated
herein. As set forth above, this determination includes amending one existing condition
of approval of the Green Hills Master Plan to allow burials on the rooftop of the Inspiration
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 5 of 36
Slope Mausoleum. The amendment to the condition is summarized and shown below with
the deleted text shown strike through and new text in bold, italic and underlined:
A. Condition No. 6.c is amended to allow burials on the rooftop of the Inspiration
Slope Mausoleum, as follows:
6.c Rooftop Interments. Rooftop interments sha-U-be subject to City Council review as
described in Condition No. 2b. Rooftop interments are allowed on the rooftop
of the Inspiration Slope Mausoleum, subject to the following conditions:
(1) During every burial service on the rooftop of the Inspiration Slope
Mausoleum, at least one employee of the cemetery shall attend and
monitor the service to ensure it is being conducted in compliance with
these conditions of approval and the cemetery park rules.
(2) The property owner shall install and maintain monitoring equipment
(examples may include but are not limited to cameras, motion
detectors, etc.) to monitor Inspiration Slope Mausoleum rooftop
activities.
(3) The property owner shall install and maintain additional signs on the
Inspiration Slope Mausoleum rooftop, which shall be clearly visible
from all areas of the Inspiration Slope Mausoleum rooftop, informing
visitors of the cemetery rules, which include but are not limited to, the
prohibition of on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages, excessive
noise and amplified music, and disruptive behavior.
(4) With the exception of ground cover, no other vegetation shall be
planted on the roof of the Inspiration Slope Mausoleum.
AMENDED ON DECEMBER 7, 2021, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX
Section 5: Modifications to Conditions. For the foregoing reasons and based on
the information and findings included in the Staff Reports, Minutes and other records of
proceedings in this matter, and pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 2.b contained in
Resolution No. 2020-03, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby adds
to the Green Hills Cemetery Master Plan Conditional Use Permit, the amended conditions
of approval that are set forth within the attached Exhibit 'A,' which is incorporated herein
by this reference.
Section 6: Judicial Review. The time within which judicial review of the decision
reflected in this Resolution must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California
Code of Civil Procedure or other applicable short periods of limitation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of December 2021.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 6 of 36
Mayor
ATTEST:
Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES )
I, Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, do hereby certify that
the above Resolution No. 2021-_, was duly adopted by the City Council of said City at
a regular meeting thereof held on December 7, 2021.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 7 of 36
EXHIBIT 'A'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
GREEN HILLS CEMETERY MASTER PLAN
27501 WESTERN AVENUE
1. General: Consistency Master Plan: This approval is a Revision to the Green Hills
Master Plan, and shall be consistent with the "Master Plan Amendment Submittal
Package" booklet dated January 29, 2007, prepared by J. Stuart Todd Inc., which allows
the following:
b. Grading Between 1991-2004. Acknowledgment that the actual quantity of grading
that has been conducted between 1991 through 2004, which is 288,814 cubic
yards (cut and fill), is 89,475 cubic yards more than originally approved by the
original Master Plan approved in 1991 through City Council Resolution No. 91-7;
c. Additional Grading. Allow a total of 643,259 cubic yards of additional grading,
which includes 97,964 cubic yards of import for all the various proposed
mausoleum buildings, and all cut and fill associated with earth interments,
including rooftop interments, throughout the cemetery site for the life of the Master
Plan. Since the applicant has previously performed grading in excess of the
provisions of the Master Plan, a topographic baseline survey prepared by Bolton
Engineering Corp. showing all existing grades was accepted as the baseline
topographic plan by the Director on April 12, 2016. All future grading will be
measured against the City-accepted baseline topographic survey. For Area 6, any
future grading will be measured against plans titled "Existing Conditions", prepared
by Bolton Engineering Corp. showing all existing grades and stamped approved
by City Staff on October 17, 2011. Prior to any Grading Permit final, the applicant
shall submit an as-built topographical survey prepared and wet-stamped by a
licensed engineer depicting the finished grades. The imported fill material will be
conducted in phases as each mausoleum building is constructed over an extended
period of time over the next 30-to 50-years, as allowed herein.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION 1.b and 1.b.v OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
c. Storage of Excavations. Temporary storage (up to 72-hours) of Interments
excavations is allowed provided that such excavation is covered or stored within
an appropriate container.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION 1.g OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
d. Slope Grades Maximum. Finish slopes and grades shall not exceed 3: 1 and shall
include the installation of erosion control methods, such as jute netting and plant
material.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION 25 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 8 of 36
e. Earth Interments. Earth interments are permitted throughout the cemetery
including family estates, which are commonly enclosed with low garden walls, as
allowed in Condition No. 1 h.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION 1 g PER RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
f. Rooftop Interments. Rooftop interments shall be subject to City Council review as
described in Condition No. 2b. Except as may otherwise be permitted by City
Council, there shall be no above ground structures, including but not limited to,
garden walls and above-ground headstones on the rooftop. Guardrails, pilasters
and/or parapet walls approved as part of the building and benches up to 36-inches
in height are permitted on the rooftop.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
g. Additional Interment Areas. Mausoleum building and garden areas shall be
permitted to be retrofitted to accommodate niches and vaults throughout the
property.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
h. Minor Cemetery Improvements. Minor cemetery improvements, including but not
limited to, water features, garden walls, bench memorials, gardens, upright
memorial features, statues, stone features (including stone landscaping features),
cenotaph walls, topiaries, sculptures and other artistic works, ossuaries, bridges,
cremation benches, outer interment containers and above ground vaults, and
similar features up to 3 feet in height and headstones up to 6 feet in height shall
be permitted throughout the cemetery and exempt from Condition No. 2, except
for the required setback areas. In Area 4, headstones above 3 feet are prohibited
and cemetery improvements shall not contain interments and/or niches.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
i. Inconsistency of Conditions. Below are specific conditions for individual areas
(Areas 1-13). In the event of any inconsistencies between the general provisions
of this Conditional Use Permit and the individual areas, the conditions of the
individual areas (Areas 1-13) shall supersede any other conditions that govern
other areas of the Green Hills property.
J. Soils Testing. The property owner shall submit a soils testing protocol report
appropriate for the cemetery that shall be reported to the City Council prior to the
2017 Annual Review to determine if soil testing should be conducted.
2. Review of Future Improvements: Future improvements shall be in substantial
compliance with the Master Plan Revision approved by the Planning Commission on
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 9 of 36
April 24, 2007, and July 22, 2014, and the City Council on November 17, 2015, as
indicated in these conditions of approval and will be reviewed by the Director of
Community Development ("Director") under Condition No. 2a or the City Council under
Condition No. 2b, as described below.
a. Director Review.
Unless the Director refers the application directly to the City Council as described
below, the following improvements may be reviewed by the Director through a Site
Plan Review, subject to appeal to the Planning Commission (or thereafter to the
City Council):
(1) Minor Modifications. Minor modifications to the approved plans or any of the
conditions that will achieve substantially the same results as would strict
compliance with such plans and conditions.
(2) Small Buildings. Except for mausoleums or unless otherwise addressed herein,
all other structures less than 120 square feet in size, including but not limited
to gazebos and shade structures, not exceeding 16 feet in height located
outside of the required setbacks, not on an extreme slope (35% or more), and
not on the roof of a mausoleum building.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.j OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
(3) Cemetery Related Features. Customary cemetery-related features over 36
inches in height, including but not limited to, water features, garden walls,
bench memorials, gardens, upright memorial features, statues, stone features
(including stone landscaping features), cenotaph walls, topiaries, sculptures
and other artistic works, ossuaries, bridges, cremation benches, outer
interments containers and above ground vaults, and similar features, provided
that the height of such features shall not exceed 16 feet. In setback areas, such
features are not permitted unless specified in the respective Area conditions
(Areas 1-13).
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1k OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
(4) Fences and Walls. Freestanding fences and walls, including perimeter walls,
up to 8 feet in height shall be permitted throughout the property. Fences and
walls (excluding perimeter fences and walls) located outside of structure
setbacks may accommodate niches or vault interments and are not subject to
interment setbacks. Perimeter fences and walls shall be solid.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
(5) Retaining Walls. Retaining walls shall be permitted throughout the property and
may accommodate niche or vault interments.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 10 of 36
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
(6) Grading. Grading shall be permitted throughout the property, provided that the
Director determines that the grading substantially complies with the Master
Plan and conditions. Any grading associated with new mausoleum buildings
shall be subject to City Council review under Condition No. 2b. With the
exception of Areas 1, 4, 5, 6, and 11, permitted grading includes grading of
areas for mass installation of vaults. Prior to commencing any earth movement,
the property owner shall obtain a grading permit as required by the Rancho
Palos Verdes Municipal Code. Grading permit shall not be required for
individual interments.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
Prior to considering a Site Plan Review application, the Director shall give a 15 day
written notice for an opportunity to comment on the matter to owners of property
within a 500-foot radius of the site of the improvements, if any, to persons
requesting notice, to all affected homeowners associations, and to the property
owner in accordance with Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code Section
17.80.090. Upon the Director's determination, Notice of the Director's decision
shall be issued to the aforesaid parties and the applicant, who shall have 15 days
to appeal the decision in writing to the Planning Commission, then to the City
Council.
In lieu of Director Review as specified above, the Director may refer future
improvements directly to the City Council in accordance with the procedure in
Condition No. 2b below.
b. City Council Review.
Significant changes to the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to direct review
and approval by the City Council. Such changes shall include the following:
(1) New construction or reconstruction of any structure over 120 square feet in
size and/or taller than 16 feet in height, including mausoleum buildings.
(2) Rooftop Interments.
(3) Any significant change in grading, including but not limited to quantities from
that shown in the Master Plan and the contours shown in the topographic
baseline survey prepared by Bolton Engineering Corp. accepted by the City
on April 12, 2016.
(4) Any modification to the Master Plan or conditions of approval, including but
not limited to, new structures in undesignated areas of the Master Plan, which
shall be processed as a revision to the Conditional Use Permit (not Site Plan
Review).
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 11 of 36
The City Council shall consider all such matters only through a noticed public
hearing. Notice of the public hearing shall be published and provided to owners of
property within a 500-foot radius, to persons requesting notice, to all affected
homeowners associations, and to the property owner in accordance with Rancho
Palos Verdes Development Code Section 17.80.090. At that time, the City Council
may determine that the proposed improvements are in substantial compliance or
add, delete, or modify the conditions of approval or the Master Plan, as deemed
necessary and appropriate. Written notice of the City Council's decision shall be
given to the property owner.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
3. Building Silhouettes. Prior to construction of any building, including any substantial
modification or reconstruction of such buildings, the applicant shall install a certified
temporary frame silhouette before the City can deem the application complete. Once
the silhouette is constructed, a licensed engineer, land surveyor or architect must
certify that the silhouette accurately depicts the location, height and outline of the
proposed building.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1i OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
4. Building Heights. Building height limitations are determined by these conditions. The
heights of each building shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted
to the Community Development Department prior to Building Permit Final. New
mausoleum buildings (including Inspiration Slope Mausoleum) shall not exceed 20-
feet in height as measured from the highest existing/preconstruction grade elevation
covered by the structure to the highest point of the structure (including railings and/or
pilaster caps), and shall not exceed an overall height of 30-feet as measured from the
lowest finished grade adjacent to the building to the highest point of the structure
(including railings and/or pilaster caps).
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 30 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
5. Area 1 (Pacifica):
a. Structure Setbacks for the Pacifica Mausoleum:
West:
North:
East:
South:
15 feet (except for portions previously approved at 5 feet and
8 feet which may not be further modified)
40 feet
25 feet
If abutting a residential zoning district, 40 feet. If abutting a
nonresidential zoning district, 25 feet
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 12 of 36
b. Earth Interments:
West:
North:
0 feet
16 feet except for the 13 interments in the northwest corner
and 6 plots already sold.
c. Supervision. During every burial service located between the north property line
and the adjacent roadway, at least one employee of the cemetery shall attend and
monitor services to ensure it is being conducted in compliance with these
conditions of approval and the cemetery park rules.
d. Vegetation. Except for the existing hedge, drought tolerant, low maintenance and
erosion controlling landscaping is required in the western setback adjacent to the
Pacifica Mausoleum expansion.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 8 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
6. Area 2 (Inspiration Slope):
a. Grading. Area will be constructed in a minimum of three phases over a period of 5-
to 10-years (as funding and budgeting become available), with the initial phase
completed in 2017. The construction will require adequate backfill to keep the
adjacent earth Interments section at a consistent level. Cumulatively, upon
completion, the project will have produced approximately 53,000 cubic yards of
grading; however, each phase will require between approximately 10,000 to 15,000
cubic yards of import. Thus, it is estimated that approximately 40,000 cubic yards
of import fill will be required for construction of the entire Inspiration Slope project.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.b.i OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
b. Mausoleum. The mausoleum on Inspiration Slope shall be located as shown on the
Master Plan so as not to impair views from the Peninsula Verde neighborhood. Any
new construction or expansion of the mausoleum shall require City Council review
as described in Condition No. 2b.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 23 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
c. Rooftop Interments. Rooftop interments are allowed on the rooftop of the Inspiration
Slope Mausoleum, subject to the following conditions:
(1) During every burial service on the rooftop of the Inspiration Slope
Mausoleum, at least one employee of the cemetery shall attend and monitor
the service to ensure it is being conducted in compliance with these
conditions of approval and the cemetery park rules.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 13 of 36
(2) The property owner shall install and maintain monitoring equipment
(examples may include but are not limited to cameras, motion detectors,
etc.) to monitor Inspiration Slope Mausoleum rooftop activities.
(3) The property owner shall install and maintain additional signs on the
Inspiration Slope Mausoleum rooftop, which shall be clearly visible from all
areas of the Inspiration Slope Mausoleum rooftop, informing visitors of the
cemetery rules, which include but are not limited to, the prohibition of on-
site consumption of alcoholic beverages, excessive noise and amplified
music, and disruptive behavior.
(4) With the exception of ground cover, no other vegetation shall be planted on
the roof of the Inspiration Slope Mausoleum.
AMENDED ON DECEMBER 7, 2021, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX.
d. Retaining Wall. The 14.16 foot tall combination wall, as measured from the lowest
adjacent finished grade to the highest point (including railings or pilaster caps),
shall be permitted to contain niches or vaults for cremated remains.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 23 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
e. Hedges. Prior to building permit final of the mausoleum, the existing hedge that
separates Crescent Lawn and Inspiration Slope shall be removed.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 20.b OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
f. Supervision. During every burial service, at least one employee of the cemetery
shall attend and monitor services to ensure it is being conducted in compliance
with these conditions of approval and the cemetery park rules.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
7. Area 3 (Reflection Mausoleum Expansion):
d. Grading. A total of approximately 14,000 cubic yards of imported fill shall be
permitted for the mausoleum construction.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.b.ii OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
b. Square Footage. Allow a new approximately 75,000 square foot mausoleum
building to the west of the existing mortuary, approximately 10,000 square feet of
which will be above grade and approximately 65,000 square feet will be below
grade, subject to City Council review as described in Condition No. 2b.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 14 of 36
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.d OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
8. Area 4 (North Terrace Drive):
a. Grading. Prior to grading operations for new earth interments areas, the property
owner shall submit a grading plan, prepared by and wet-stamped by a licensed
civil engineer. The existing grade elevation shall not be raised without prior
approval by the Director, pursuant to Condition No. 2a.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
b. Structures. Except as provided in Condition No. 8d, no above ground structures
are permitted within the 8' setback from the north property line, including but not
limited to, garden walls for family estate interments, or other built-up structures.
For areas outside of the 8 foot setback, minor cemetery improvements are
permitted as provided in Condition No. 1 h.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.f OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
c. Earth Interment Setbacks:
East: 0 feet
North: 8 feet
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
d. Perimeter Fence or Wall. An 8 foot tall vinyl fence shall be installed along the north
property line abutting the rear yards of the residential properties on Peninsula
Verde Drive. The fence shall be earth-tone in color, approximately 1, 150 feet long,
and shall be set back at least 2 feet from the north property line. Notwithstanding
existing encroachments by the abutting residents, the property owner shall be
responsible for installing the perimeter fence by June 1, 2018, subject to Condition
No. 2a.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
e. Landscape Screening. In areas where no landscaping exists, the property owner
shall submit a landscaping plan to the Director for review and approval and shall
install landscaping within 90-days of installation of the perimeter fence or wall (refer
to Condition No. 1 0.d) for screening purposes. Landscaping shall be planted on
the cemetery side and shall measure at least 8 feet in height from adjacent grade.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 15 of 36
Neither the existing nor proposed landscaping shall significantly impair any near
or far view as defined by the Development Code. The property owner shall be
responsible for continuous maintenance of said landscaping.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 19 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
f. Supervision. During every burial service located between the north property line
and the adjacent roadway, at least one employee of the cemetery shall attend and
monitor services to ensure it is being conducted in compliance with these
conditions of approval and the cemetery park rules.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
9. Areas 5 and 6:
a. Grading. Approximately 137,000 cubic yards of grading is permitted to
accommodate future mausoleum buildings and earth interments.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.h OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
b. Excess Material/Stockpiling in Area 6. Excess earth material resulting from
interment sites, ground spoils, construction, or site grading, shall be permitted to
be stored/stockpiled. The property owner shall maintain a minimum 8 foot high
chain link fence with a mesh material to reasonably screen, enclose, and confine
Area 6, consistent with the plans on file and approved by the Director in February
2017, to mitigate any unsightly aesthetic conditions related to the stockpiling,
storage of materials, and trash. Area 6 shall be regularly watered to reduce dust
emissions and meet SCAQMD Rule 403 which prohibits dust clouds to be visible
beyond the project site boundaries. A weatherproof notice/sign setting forth the
name of the person(s) responsible for the daily dirt movement to Area 6 and a
phone number(s) to be called in the event that dust is visible from Area 6, shall be
posted and displayed on the fencing.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1h OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6, 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
c. Mausoleums in Area 6. Allow 5 separate mausoleum buildings with each footprint
measuring approximately 24,000 square feet, subject to City Council review as
described in Condition No. 2b.
d. Structure Setbacks:
West:
South:
5 feet
40 feet
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 16 of 36
e. Earth Interments Setbacks:
West:
South:
5 feet
20 feet (presumes 8 foot landscape buffer and 10 foot wide
roadway)
f. Landscape Screening. Landscaping shall be planted within 8' of the future south
perimeter wall on the cemetery side prior to the completion of the future roadway
(refer to Condition No. 9g) for screening purposes. Landscaping shall measure at
least 8 feet in height from adjacent grade. Neither the existing nor proposed
landscaping shall significantly impair any near or far view as defined by the
Development Code. The property owner shall be responsible for continuous
maintenance of this landscaping.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 20.b OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
g. Road. The future road extension that parallels the south property line shall be
completed prior to the City issuing a final occupancy permit for any building in Area
6. The future road extension that parallels the south property line shall be setback
a minimum of 8 feet from the future wall to provide a landscape buffer as required
in Condition No. 9f. Prior to construction, the future road shall include traffic
calming measures as deemed acceptable by the Director of Community
Development.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 27 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
h. Supervision. During every burial service, at least one employee of the cemetery
shall attend and monitor services to ensure it is being conducted in compliance
with these conditions of approval and the cemetery park rules.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
i. Historic Church in Area 6. Revision "D" to conditional use permit of the Green Hills
permits the placement of an historic church building in Area 6 of the Master Plan,
southwest of the existing duck pond. The church building measures less than
1,100 square feet in area, and has a steeple at the front of the building that is 7-
feet wide, 7-feet deep, and 38-feet tall.
(1) The church building may be used for funeral services only, and may not be
used for congregational church services. Further, the existing bell may remain
as a decorative feature only, and the bell or bell recordings may not be used.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 17 of 36
(2) Major additions to the church building or relocation of the church building to
another location on the property are not allowed without prior City Council
approval.
(3) Hours. The Chapel may be open to the public from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
Monday through Sunday.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.1 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
10.Area 7 (Southwest Terrace Mausoleum):
a. Grading. Area 7 will not require import of fill since the amount of excavation far
exceeds the amount of backfill necessary for this mausoleum buildings, and the
excess dirt will be placed and compacted in Areas 5 and 6 of the Master Plan (i.e.,
the southern and southwestern portions of the cemetery site), which is not
expected to be developed for another 30 years.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.b.iii OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31. 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
b. Mausoleum. New mausoleum is permitted at the southwest side of the cemetery,
with a building footprint of approximately 38,000 square feet, subject to City
Council review as described in Condition No. 2b.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.e OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
c. Setbacks:
Structures West: 5 feet
Earth Interments West: 5 feet
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
11.Area 11 (Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum):
a. Grading. Area 11 will not require import of fill since the amount of excavation far
exceeds the amount of backfill necessary for this mausoleum building, and the
excess dirt will be placed and compacted in Areas 5 and 6 of the Master Plan (i.e.,
the southern and southwestern portions of the cemetery site), which is not
expected to be developed for another 30-years.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.b.iii OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
b. Setbacks for the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum are as follows:.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 18 of 36
North: 8: feet for the portion constructed and finaled as of 2013.
40: feet for future expansions.
West: If abutting a residential zoning district, 40: feet.
If abutting a nonresidential zoning district, 25: feet.
South: If abutting a residential zoning district, 40: feet.
If abutting a nonresidential zoning district, 25: feet.
East: 25: feet
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 8.a OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
c. Tractor Ramp. The entire length of the tractor ramp shall be left clear at all times
when not in use. No vehicles, landscaping equipment, construction equipment,
storage containers, etc. may be parked, stored or left on the tractor ramp.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.a OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
d. Ramp Guardrail. The guardrail fence along the tractor ramp and along the top of
the mausoleum building along the north (rear) shall not be a solid wall and shall be
maintained as a wrought iron guardrail.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.d OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
e. Screen Rear Wall. The Northern (rear) wall of the mausoleum building shall be
screened by a type of wall vine landscaping. The landscaping shall be planted and
allowed to grow on the wall only, to the satisfaction of the Director and shall not
grow above the wall.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.b OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
f. Landscaping.
(1) Roof. With the exception of ground cover, no other vegetation shall be planted
on the roof of the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum. For other
areas within Area 11 that are outside the footprint of the Pacific
Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum, only ground cover, shrubs and other
vegetation below the height of the existing wall on the property line are allowed.
Vines are allowed on the northern wall of the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace
Mausoleum building provided that they do not exceed the solid building
parapet.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.c OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
(2) Tree Screen at Mausoleum. If desired by the Vista Verde Condominium
Association, applicant shall plant suitable trees or landscape screening
between the condominium building and the Mausoleum. The Director shall
approve the materials, size, and plant spacing. Applicant shall keep the screen
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 19 of 36
in good health and replace any plants when necessary to maintain the screen
without obstructing significant views.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 20.b OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
g. Additions to Mausoleum. No additions or expansion shall be allowed to the existing
Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum in Area 11. No new mausoleum
building shall be constructed within Area 11 without first obtaining City Council
approval at a duly noticed public hearing following the process set forth in
Condition 2b.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.e OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
h. Rooftop Interments. The following conditions are applicable to all interments on
the roof of the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum Building.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2016, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
(1) Pre and Post Service. Pre-service interment preparation and post-service plot
backfilling of the rooftop earth interments on the Pacific Terrace/Memorial
Terrace Mausoleum building shall only be allowed between the hours of 10:00
a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Sunday (See Condition 17).
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5.a OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2016, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
(2) Hours. Burials and all associated services on the roof top earth interments of
the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum building shall only be
allowed between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through
Sunday.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5.b OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2016, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
(3) Sales. Sales personnel shall be allowed to show potential roof-top earth
interment plots on the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum building
in Area 11, only between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Monday through
Sunday.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5.f OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2016, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
(4) Haul Vehicle. The use of a mini-haul vehicle (which is illustrated in Green Hills'
power point presentation to the Planning Commission on May 13, 2014) shall
be limited to pre-service interment preparation and post-service plot backfilling
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 20 of 36
of the rooftop earth interments during the hours of 1 0:00am and 3:00 p.m.,
Monday through Sunday.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5.d OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2016, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
(5) Sound. The use of amplified sound is prohibited on the rooftop of the Pacific
Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum building. This prohibition shall not apply
to the amplified sound for the playing of "Taps" as part of funeral services for
military personnel and for police, fire and other first responders.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5.d OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
(6) Tenting. All services on the rooftop of the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace
Mausoleum building shall be conducted within temporary covered tenting that
is enclosed on a minimum of 2 sides, as illustrated in Green Hills' power point
presentation to the Planning Commission on May 13, 2014. One of the two
covered sides shall be the north side facing the Vista Verde Condominium
complex. Temporary tenting shall be erected no earlier than 2 hours prior to the
burial service and shall be removed within 2 hours after the burial service.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5.e OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
(7) Notice to Property Owners. Small flags shall be placed on any interment site
located on the rooftop of the Pacific Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum
within 24 hours after a burial service has been scheduled for that site, to provide
neighboring property owners with advanced notice of scheduled interment and
burial services, unless burial will be in less than 24 hours from death in which
case flags will be placed as soon as possible before the service. The property
owner shall also post on its publicly accessible website
(www.greenhillsmemorial.com) additional details concerning the anticipated
time and date of scheduled burial services.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5.g OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2016, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
(8) Supervision. During every burial service occurring on the rooftop of the Pacific
Terrace/Memorial Terrace Mausoleum, at least one employee of the cemetery
shall attend and monitor services to ensure it is being conducted in compliance
with these conditions of approval and cemetery park rules.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5.h OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
(9) Excluded Areas. In no event shall below-grade interments be allowed on the
roof of the Memorial Terrace Mausoleum building that are within 16-feet from
the northern property line. Specifically, plots illustrated in sections 540 through
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 21 of 36
553, as depicted in the attached Exhibit C of Resolution No. 2015-102, are
hereby eliminated.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.3.5.i OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
(10) Mediation with Homeowners. Owners in the Vista Verde Condominium Project
have made objections and claims against the City concerning the fact that the
Pacific Terrace/Memorial Mausoleum is constructed at the 8 foot setback line
instead of the previous setback which existed before 2007. If requested by the
Vista Verde homeowners, Green Hills will undertake an appraisal to determine
if there has been a loss of real estate value resulting to the homeowners from
the construction of the Mausoleum and what that loss might be. Green Hills will
participate in a mediation process with the Vista Verde homeowners and
attempt to settle claims by such homeowners for values up to the amount of
the appraisal differential, using either the existing appraisal or a new appraisal
requested by the Vista Verde homeowners. City representatives will also
participate in this mediation on behalf of City. If the Vista Verde homeowners
refuse to participate in the mediation, or the mediation does not result in a
settlement of the disputes, then Green Hills is responsible for defense of its
entitlements pursuant to the indemnification provisions in Condition 33.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 40 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
12.Area 13 (Administration Building):
a. Expansion. The approval for the Administration Building expansion project is
Revision "E" to the Green Hills Conditional Use Permit and shall be consistent with
the approved plans prepared by Bolton Engineering Corp. dated April 9, 2015
(sheets C-0, C-1, ESCP, RW-1) and Anthony Frank Inferrera dated April 4, 2015
(sheet A-0 only), that allows 3,323 square feet of single-story office additions, 648
square foot covered walkway extension, and 316 square foot covered entry to the
Administration Building.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.1.a OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
b. Temporary Modular Buildings. Allow temporary modular buildings to remain on
site, but be removed prior to April 22, 2017, or Building Permit Final of the
expansions, whichever comes first. Any extension requests shall be reviewed by
the City Council prior to April 22, 2017, pursuant to Condition No. 29.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.1.b OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 22 of 36
c. Parking Area. A total of 81 parking spaces shall be maintained (95 existing).
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.1.c OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102
d. Grading. Conduct 325 cubic yards of grading for the following emergency access
and ADA access/parking improvements:
(1) Widen the driveway (portion of Arroyo Drive) located south of the
Administration Building from approximately 20 feet to 26 feet supported by a
2.5 foot tall retaining wall to accommodate emergency vehicles.
(2) Widen the access and parking area to the north of the Administration Building
to accommodate adequate handicap van parking and ADA access area;
thereby necessitating the removal of the existing 3 foot tall retaining wall and
the construction of a new replacement retaining wall measuring up to 4.45 feet
in height.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.1.d OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
e. Structure Setbacks.
East:
West:
South:
25 feet
40 feet interior and side if abutting a residential zoning district
and 2 feet if abutting a nonresidential zoning district
40 feet interior and side if abutting a residential zoning district
and 25 feet if abutting a nonresidential zoning district
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.2.a OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
f. Parking.
(1) Parking areas shall provide for a 25 feet outside turning radius within the facility.
(2) All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphaltic or cement concrete paving
which is at least 3 inches thick.
(3) All parking stalls shall be clearly marked with lines, and access lanes shall be
clearly defined with directional arrows to guide traffic. Except for parallel
parking stalls, standard parking stalls shall be of a minimum 9 feet width by 20
feet depth in area. Parallel parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet in depth.
(4) Disabled parking spaces shall be in accordance with the dimensions and
specifications of the state amended Uniform Building Code.
(5) A minimum of 5% of the paved parking area shall be devoted to interior planting
areas. All planting areas shall be at least 3 feet wide. Perimeter planting shall
not be considered part of this required interior planting.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 23 of 36
(6) Wherever a center divider separates parking stalls facing each other, tree wells
shall be established not more than 50 feet apart for larger trees, or not more
than 30' for small and medium sized trees.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.2.b OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
g. Landscaping.
(1) All plantings shall be maintained free of debris and in conformity with the
accepted practices for landscape maintenance.
(2) A 6 inches high cement concrete curb shall be constructed at the edge of all
landscaped areas.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 1.2.c OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
(3) The existing eucalyptus trees on the west side of the Administration Building
parking lot shall not be removed unless required by the holder of the easement
in which the trees are located or acceptable evidence is provided to the Director
from a certified arborist supporting removal.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 20.a OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
h. Hours. The Administration Building public hours are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 9:00
p.m. Monday through Sunday.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 17.b OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
13. Setbacks -All Other Areas Not Specified:
a. Earth Interments and Roads. "Garden" burial interment sites with no above-
ground structures (other than benches for seating) and roads shall be as follows:
North and South: 8 feet
East and West: 0 feet
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 6 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
b. Setbacks for Above Ground Structures, including but not limited to mausoleums
and crypts shall be as follows:
North:
South:
80 feet or no closer than the northern perimeter road,
whichever is greater from the north property line that is
north of the maintenance yard, and 40' from the north
property line.
40 feet
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 24 of 36
East:
West:
25 feet
5 feet
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 7 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
14. Noise. The property owner shall conduct its activities on site so as to not create noise
nuisances to neighboring properties. Live and/or amplified music, for funeral services
community events shall be limited to the duration of the service or event. No noise
shall emanate from the property exceeding 65 dBA at the common property lines
abutting a Residential Zoning District. The property owner shall be responsible for
monitoring, preventing, and initiating timely corrective action to address any noise
problems. This condition shall apply in addition to any noise ordinance and/or code
amendment adopted by the City, and when there is conflicting requirements, the
stricter requirement shall apply.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 9 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
15. Cemetery Liaison. The property owner shall provide abutting Homeowner
Associations and any neighbors that request contact information for Green Hills
Cemetery personnel that can be contacted about operational impacts, including but
not limited to, excessive noise or other activities.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 11 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
16. Security. At least one security employee shall be on duty patrolling and monitoring
activities on the property for the entirety of the cemetery operation hours. Security
reports shall be made available to the Neighborhood Advisory Committee at its
meetings as described in Condition 17.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6, 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
17. Green Hills Cemetery Neighborhood Advisory Committee. Green Hills shall
establish a neighborhood advisory committee, consisting of two representatives and
one observer from the Peninsula Verde and the Rolling Riviera homeowner's
associations, as well as a representative from City Staff. The Committee shall meet at
least once each calendar year, but no more than four times per calendar year during
normal business hours to review any operational and neighborhood concerns. Reports
on the meeting shall be provided to the City Council.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6, 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 21, 2020, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2020-03
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 25 of 36
18. Signage. The property owner shall install and maintain visible signage at various
locations throughout the property informing visitors of the cemetery rules, including
but not limited to, the prohibition of on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages,
excessive noise and amplified music, and disruptive behavior. At a minimum, the
cemetery park rule signs shall be installed at the park cemetery entrance and in Areas
1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 11, approved by the Director.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 10 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
18.a The property owner shall be allowed to hang an internally-illuminated sign
from the primary identification sign located adjacent to South Western Avenue
that shall advertise no more than four annual events and no more than two hours-
of-operation changes (due to the semiannual Daylight Saving Time changes) at
various times throughout the year, subject to the following:
i. The temporary sign shall be internally-illuminated with LEDs, the same as
the primary identification sign. The temporary sign shall be allowed to have
different text and graphics for each of the annual events and hours-of-
operation change notifications, and shall measure 3 feet tall by 14 feet wide
to match the width of the primary identification sign.
The temporary signage shall be displayed up to 30 days in advance of each
event, and shall be removed within seven days after the conclusion of each
event. The four allowable events shall be:
• Memorial Day Commemoration (last Monday in May)
• Easter Sunrise Service (March/April)
• Harvest Festival (October)
• Snow Days (December)
Approximately 30 days prior to the semiannual time changes, signs
advertising the changes to the hours of operation detailed in Condition
No. 20.b of this Resolution shall be displayed.
ii. The temporary sign shall be mounted to the primary identification sign.
iii. The approved LED sign shall not exceed Municipal Code requirements for
outdoor lighting (RPVMC Section 17.56.040) and shall have an automatic
dimming system to control the amount of lumens emitted during the different
operating times of the day and evening. The approved LED sign shall only
be used during the approved park operating hours, specified in Resolution
No. 2018-07.
Iv. The events associated with the temporary sign shall comply with all
conditions of approval detailed in City Council-adopted Resolution No.
2018-07.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 26 of 36
AMENDED ON JANUARY 21, 2020, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2020-03
19. Construction:
a. Construction Sites. All construction sites shall be maintained in a secure, safe,
neat and orderly manner, to the satisfaction of the City's Building Official. All
construction waste and debris resulting from a construction, alteration or repair
project shall be removed on a weekly basis by the contractor or property owner.
Existing or temporary portable bathrooms shall be provided during construction.
Portable bathrooms shall be placed in a location that will minimize disturbance to
the surrounding property owners, to the satisfaction of the City's Building Official.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 13 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
b. Trash and Debris. The construction site and adjacent public and private properties
and streets shall be kept free of all loose materials resembling trash and debris in
excess of that material used for immediate construction purposes. Such excess
material may include, but is not limited to: the accumulation of debris, garbage,
lumber, scrap metal, concrete, asphalt, piles of earth, salvage materials,
abandoned or discarded furniture, appliances or other household fixtures. All
landscape pruning, including but not limited to grass, leaves, branches, fertilizer,
etc., shall be properly stored in areas with minimal visual impact to adjacent
homeowners, and shall be stored in appropriate containers and disposed of in a
lawful manner.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 14 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
c. Storage of Equipment and Supplies. When not being used in the daily operations
of the cemetery, equipment and supplies shall be stored in areas with minimal
visual impact to adjacent homeowners or in the maintenance yard if possible.
Equipment and supplies shall be neatly stacked so they do not pose a safety
hazard or become a property maintenance issue. All landscaping equipment and
vehicles, and all vehicles used for maintenance and/or burial preparation shall be
stored in the maintenance yard.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 15 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
d. Temporary Trailers. Temporary trailers are only allowed during construction of the
mausoleum buildings. The location of any such trailers shall be illustrated on plans
for the Grading Permit as described and required in condition AQ-1 below, and
shall be approved by the Director. Further, all trailers shall be removed prior to
building/grading permit final.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 16 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
e. Employee Training. The property owner shall continue to provide for new
employees, training programs on a regular basis, in accordance with Cal OSHA
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 27 of 36
recommendations on the proper handling and safety requirements of equipment
and material in the mortuary and crematory, as well as compliance with the
requirements of these conditions of approval.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 12 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
f. Easements. Any grading, construction, placement of structures, including but not
limited to walls, fences, and interments on any easement, requires prior written
permission from the easement holder. All easements shall be identified on plans
submitted to the City.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 34 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
20. Hours of Operations:
b. General. This section shall govern hours of operations except for any provision
concerning specific areas of the cemetery.
c. Hours of Facilities. Unless otherwise specified in these conditions, hours of
operation are as follows except for the following events: Easter Sunrise, Memorial
Day, Let It Snow, Harvest Festival, and Shakespeare in the Park. The property
owner shall provide the dates of the aforementioned events to the Director by
January 1st of each year.
Park Hours: 7am to 5pm -Pacific Standard Time
7am to 7pm -Pacific Daylight Time
Mausoleum Hours: 7am to 4:30pm -Pacific Standard Time
7am to 6:30pm -Pacific Daylight Time
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6, 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
d. Construction Working Hours. Construction and grading activities, including but not
limited to equipment warm up, geologic investigations, interments excavation for
placement of vaults and installation or removal of large landscape materials or
landscaping maintenance shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on weekdays
only.
e. Construction In Proximity to Residential. Notwithstanding the foregoing, within 120
feet of any property line abutting a Residential Zoning District, no construction or
grading, including grading operations to prepare sites for earth interments, shall
occur before 9:00 a.m. or after 3:30 p.m. All equipment shall be equipped with a
muffler to reduce on-site grading and construction noise levels.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 28 of 36
f. Non-Construction and Burial Related Activity. Excavation for removal and
replacement of vault tops and earth for preparation of interment sites, individual
placement of vaults for funeral services and operation of landscape maintenance
equipment shall be allowed in any area of the park between the hours of 7:00 a.m.
and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on
Saturday, Sunday, and federally observed holidays.
f. The Moving Wall. (Traveling half-size replica of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial).
The property owner shall be allowed to have The Moving Wall located on the
property no more than 10 calendar days per calendar year, subject to the following:
i. The Moving Wall shall be allowed to remain on display for no more than 10
days.
ii. Security. The Moving Wall shall be monitored 24-hours a day by security
staff hired by the property owner. Any visitors wishing to visit the wall after
the hours of operation detailed in Condition No. 20b shall be escorted on and
off the property.
iii. Plans. At least 60 days prior to the installation of The Moving Wall on the
property, the property owner shall notify the Director of Community
Development where The Moving Wall is proposed to be placed.
iv. Lighting. Any temporary lighting proposed for The Moving Wall shall comply
with Mitigation Measures A-1, A-2, and A-3 as detailed in Condition No. 22.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 17 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 21, 2020, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2020-03
21. Landscaping and Irrigation. Landscaping and irrigation in all setbacks require
review and approval by the Director prior to installation.-lrrigation systems shall be
designed to provide adequate coverage with no over-spray, runoff, or excessive
quantities of water output. Use of drip irrigation systems is required wherever possible.
A low water use turf shall be used in all new lawn areas. Prior to installation, the
Director shall review and approve the landscape and irrigation plan for the setback
areas. All existing and future landscaping shall be properly maintained in a healthy
and trimmed manner at all times.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NOS. 18 and 24 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
22. Mitigation Monitoring. All mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program contained in P.C. Resolution No. 2007-32 for the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, shall be incorporated into the implementation of the proposed
project and adhered to. The mitigation measures are as follows:
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 29 of 36
A-1: No new light poles, light standards, or other form of lighting is allowed along the
roadways within the cemetery without prior written approval by the Director and shall
comply with RPVDC Section 17.56.040 (Outdoor lighting for nonresidential uses).
A-2: No exterior, building-mounted lighting is allowed on the fagade elevations that
are closest to and oriented towards residences. All other lighting shall be arranged
and shielded as to prevent direct illumination of surrounding property and shall comply
with RPVDC Section 17.56.040 (Outdoor lighting for nonresidential uses).
A-3: All pedestrian-oriented lights along the exterior of the mausoleum buildings shall
be in the form of lights that are inset into the adjoining walls. Further, the lighting shall
be arranged and/or shielded as to prevent direct illumination of surrounding property
and prevent visibility of the light source and shall comply with RPVDC Section
17.56.040 (Outdoor lighting for nonresidential uses).
AQ-1: Prior to construction of each building contained in the approved Master Plan,
the applicant shall submit a grading plan prepared by and wet-stamped by a licensed
engineer for review and approval by the Director to ensure consistency with the
approved Master Plan, in accordance with Condition 2a, which shall include, but not
be limited to, grading quantities, height, area and location of buildings and that the
buildings will not have adverse impacts upon adjacent properties.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AQ-2: During construction of any improvements associated with the Master Plan, the
owner shall ensure that all unpaved construction areas shall be watered at least twice
a day during excavation and construction to reduce dust emissions and meet
SCAQMD Rule 403 which prohibits dust clouds to be visible beyond the project site
boundaries.
AQ-3: During construction of any improvements associated with the Master Plan, the
owner shall ensure that all clearing, grading, earth moving or demolition activities shall
be discontinued during periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 15 mph), so as to
prevent excessive amounts of dust.
AQ-4: During construction of any improvements associated with the Master Plan, the
owner shall ensure that General contractors shall maintain and operate construction
equipment so as to minimize exhaust emissions.
AQ-5: During construction of any improvements associated with the Master Plan, the
owner shall ensure that on-site construction vehicle speeds are limited to a maximum
of 15 miles per hour on unpaved roads.
AQ-6: During construction of any improvements associated with the Master Plan, the
owner shall ensure that all on-site construction roads with vehicle traffic will be
watered periodically as necessary for dust suppression.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 30 of 36
AQ-7: During construction of any improvements associated with the Master Plan, the
owner shall ensure that street sweeping will be initiated if visible dust is deposited
upon public paved roadways due to the project.
AQ-8: During the daily cemetery operations, the property owner shall ensure that all
clearing and earth moving will be discontinued during periods of high winds (i.e.,
greater than 25 mph), so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. This shall not apply
to excavations for individual burial plots prior to a service, or to filling of individual
burial plots after a service.
AQ-9: During the daily cemetery operations, the property owner shall ensure that on-
site vehicle speeds associated with the transporting of earth materials are limited to
15 miles per hour on unpaved roads.
AQ-1 0: The property owner shall ensure that grave spoils are placed in Area 5 and/or
Area 6 of the Master Plan, which will be placed to fill the areas. A minimum 8-foot high
chain link fence with a mesh material to reasonably screen the fill area from neighbors
shall enclose and confine said area.
AQ-11: The confined fill locations described in mitigation measure AQ-10 above, shall
be regularly watered to reduce dust emissions and meet SCAQMD Rule 403 which
prohibits dust clouds to be visible beyond the project site boundaries.
AQ-12: A weatherproof notice/sign setting forth the name of the person(s) responsible
for the daily dirt movement to these confined fill locations and a phone number(s) to
be called in the event that dust is visible from the confined fill locations described in
mitigation measure AQ-10 above, shall be posted and displayed on the fencing.
AQ-13: If stockpiling of earth material becomes necessary for ultimate use as backfill,
stockpiling shall only be located in Area 5 and/or Area 6 of the Master Plan, and shall
be subject to conditions AQ-10, AQ-11 and AQ-12 above.
AQ-14: The Director or the City Council shall review future improvements in
accordance with Condition No. 2. The City Council shall review any changes to faf the
Master Plan or the conditions of approval associated with the Master Plan in
accordance with Condition No. 2b. At that time, the City Council may add, delete, or
modify the conditions of approval as deemed necessary and appropriate.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
GS-1: The property owner shall submit a geotechnical report for review and approval
by the City Geologist prior to the issuance of a building permit for each mausoleum
building or grading permit for any earth movement beyond that associated with ground
interment sites, unless the City Geologist deems that a geotechnical report is not
warranted. Further, prior to any additional placement of fill in Area 5, a detailed grading
plan with relevant geotechnical reports supporting recommendations for grading in
Areas 5 and 6 shall be submitted by the applicant to the City for review and approval
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 31 of 36
by the Building and Safety Division and the City Geologist prior to issuance of a
building permit for any mausoleum.
GS-2: The property owner shall ensure that all applicable conditions as specified
within the geotechnical report and all measures required by the City Geologist are
incorporated into the project.
HW-1: The property owner shall prepare a Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan
(SUSMP) along with a Maintenance Agreement and Transfer. The SUSMP and
related information shall be reviewed and approved by the Director, or his/her
designee prior to the issuance of grading and building permits for any mausoleum
building.
N-1: Construction activity of the mausoleum buildings and grading operations shall be
limited to the hours of 7:00 am and 4:00 pm, Monday through Friday. There shall be
no construction on Saturdays, Sundays or federally observed holidays unless a
Special Construction Permit is obtained 48 hours prior to work on a federally observed
holiday.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
N-2: During demolition, construction and/or grading operations, trucks shall not park,
queue and/or idle at the project site or in the adjoining street rights-of-way before 7:00
am Monday through Friday and before 9:00 am on Saturday, in accordance with the
permitted hours of construction stated in this condition. When feasible to do so, the
construction contractor shall provide staging areas on-site to minimize off-site
transportation of heavy construction equipment. These areas shall be located to
maximize the distance between staging activities and neighboring properties, subject
to approval by the building official.
N-3: The City Council shall conduct an annual review or as deemed necessary by the
City Council to review the property owner's compliance with all conditions of approval
associated with the Master Plan. At that time, the City Council may add, delete, or
modify the conditions of approval as deemed necessary and appropriate. Notice of
said review hearing shall be published and provided to owners of property within a
500~ foot radius, to persons requesting notice, to all affected homeowners
associations, and to the property owner in accordance with Rancho Palos Verdes
Development Code Section 17.80.090.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 5 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
23. Sewer and Water Facilities. The site shall be served by adequately sized water
system facilities as determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. All Los
Angeles County Fire Department requirements shall be satisfied prior to building
permit issuance for mausoleum buildings. Any new sewer and water facilities must tie
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 32 of 36
into local main lines. The usage of the site may be limited by the size and type of
sewage and water systems that can legally be installed
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 26 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
24. Compliance With Authorities. Development shall comply with all requirements of
the various municipal utilities and agencies that provide public services to the site. On
an annual basis, the property owner shall provide the City with copies of permits from
the South Coast Air Quality Management District and Los Angeles County Fire
Prevention Bureau for storage of fuel. The property owner shall also provide copies of
permits from the Los Angeles County Fire Department, Hazardous Maintenance
Division Section and Fire Prevention Bureau, for the chemicals stored in the
embalming rooms in the Administration Building. Permits from the South Coast Air
Quality Management District for the crematory must also be provided.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 31 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
25. State Permits. On an annual basis, the property owner shall provide the City with
copies of current and valid permits and/or licenses from the State Cemetery and
Funeral Board.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 32 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
26. Encroachment Permits. Prior to conducting any work in the public right of way, such
as for curb cuts, dumpsters, temporary improvements and/or permanent
improvements, the property owner shall obtain an encroachment permit from the
Director of Public Works.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 33 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
27. No Waiver of Law. Approval of this permit shall not be construed as a waiver of
applicable and appropriate zoning regulations, or any Federal, State, County and/or
City laws and regulations. Unless otherwise expressly specified, all other
requirements of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code shall apply.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 35 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
28. Conflict of Law. The project development on the site shall conform to the specific
standards contained in these conditions of approval or, if not addressed herein, shall
conform to the Cemetery development standards of the City's Municipal Code,
including but not limited to height, setback and lot coverage standards. In the event
that a Planning requirement and a Building & Safety requirement are in conflict with
one another, the stricter standard shall apply.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 36 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
29. Enforcement.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 33 of 36
a. Revocation. Should the property ownerJail to comply with any of these conditions
of approval or mitigation measures, after written notice to applicant and the
opportunity to cure, the City may initiate revocation procedures for this permit,
which shall include a public hearing. Notice of said public hearing shall be
published and provided to owners of property within a 500 foot radius, to persons
requesting notice, to all affected homeowners associations, and to the property
owner in accordance with Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code Section
17.80.090. Failure to comply with and adhere to all of these conditions of approval
may be cause to revoke the approval of the project pursuant to the revocation
procedures contained in Section 17.86.060 of the City's Municipal Code.
b. Administrative Citation. In addition to Condition No. 33.a, the property owner may
be subject to administrative citations as described in Section 1.16 of the City's
Municipal Code for failing to comply with all of these conditions of approval.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 37 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
30. Submission Property Line Survey Maps. Within 30 days from November 17, 2015,
the property owner submitted a certified property line survey to the Director verifying
that the existing above ground interments and structures do not exceed 6-feet in
height outside of the required 5 foot setback along the west property line in the area
south of the Pacifica Mausoleum building (Area 1 ).
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 38 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
31. Recordation of Final Maps. The property owner shall submit any map to the Director
to be recorded at least 30-days prior to recording of said map with the Los Angeles
County Recorder's Office. No later than 30 days after recordation, the property owner
shall submit a recorded copy to the Director.
ADDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
32. Fees and Costs. Except as otherwise specified, the property owner is responsible
for all costs complying with the provisions of the Master Plan and of this Conditional
Use Permit. The property owner shall be required to pay 110% of the estimated
amount of the cost of services to be provided on behalf of the City by any outside
consultants that have been retained by the City to render services specifically in
connection this project, in the form of a trust deposit account (or reimbursement
agreement or other instrument approved by the City Attorney), prior to
commencement of such services (e.g. City Attorney, City Engineer, Geotechnical
Consultants, Noise Consultants, etc.). The property owner shall adequately fund the
trust deposit account prior to the commencement of services, in amounts reasonably
requested by the City, based upon an estimate of the cost of services for the period
of at least 90 days for which services are rendered. In addition, the trust deposit
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 34 of 36
account shall be replenished within two weeks of receipt of notice from the City that
additional funds are needed.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 39 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
33. Defense of Claims Against Project.
a. Non-Liability of City. The Parties acknowledge that: (i) In the future there may be
challenges to legality, validity and adequacy of the Project approvals; and (ii) If
successful, such challenges could delay or prevent the ongoing use of the Project
as provided herein. In addition to the other provisions of the CUP, including,
without limitation, the provisions of this Section, City shall have no liability under
the CUP for the inability of property owner to develop the Property as contemplated
by the Master Plan or the CUP as the result of a judicial determination that the
General Plan, Master Plan, the Land Use Regulations, the CUP, or portions
thereof, are invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law.
b. Revision of Land Use Restrictions. lffor any reason the General Plan, Master Plan,
Land Use Regulations, this CUP or any part thereof of the property approvals is
hereafter judicially determined as provided above to be not in compliance with the
State or Federal Constitutions, laws or regulations and if such noncompliance can
be cured by an appropriate amendment thereof otherwise conforming to the
provisions of this CUP, then the CUP shall remain in full force and effect to the
extent permitted by law. The Master Plan and this CUP shall be amended, as
necessary, in order to comply with such judicial decision.
c. Scope of Indemnification. The property owner shall agree to defend, indemnify and
hold harmless, the City, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action
or proceeding against the City and the application will either undertake defense of
the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs, or will advance funds to pay
for defense of the matter by the City Attorney. If the City fails to promptly notify the
property owner of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully
in the defense, the property owner shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify or hold harmless the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains
the right to settle or abandon the matter without the property owner's consent, but
should it do so, the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except the City's
decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to
appeal, shall not cause a waiver of indemnification rights herein, providing,
however, that the adverse judgment or failure to appeal is not due to the City's
failure to promptly notify Applicant or to cooperate fully in the defense. The
foregoing includes, but is not limited to, any and all claim(s), causes of action or
lawsuit(s) brought by the Claimants, by their homeowners' association or by
anyone else on their behalf.
d. Limitation of Indemnity. Notwithstanding the generality of the above, for purposes
of the current claims by the Vista Verde homeowners concerning the Mausoleum,
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 35 of 36
the City shall bear its own legal defense costs, but this restriction shall not apply
to future matters.
e. Hold Harmless: Construction and Other Activities. The property owner hereby
agrees to, and shall defend, save and hold City and its elected and appointed
boards, commissions, officers, agents, and employees harmless from any and all
claims, costs (including attorneys' fees) and liability for any damages, personal
injury or death, which may arise, directly or indirectly, from Green Hills or Green
Hills' agents, contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees' operations under
the CUP, whether such operations be by the property owner or by any of the
property owner's agents, contractors or subcontractors or by any one or more
persons directly or indirectly employed by or acting as agent for the property owner
or any of the property owner's agents, contractors or subcontractors. Nothing
herein is intended to make the property owner liable for intentional wrongful and/or
reckless acts of City's officers, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.
f. Survival of Indemnity Obligations. All indemnity provisions set forth in this
Agreement shall survive termination of this Agreement or CUP for any reason other
than City's default.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 41 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
34.Applicant Acceptance of Conditions. The property owner shall submit to the City a
statement, in writing, that they have read, understand and agree to all conditions of
approval contained in this approval, and subsequent amendments to the conditions of
Approval. Failure to provide said written statement within thirty (30) days following the
date of this approval and subsequent amendments to the conditions of Approval shall
render this approval null and void.
PREVIOUSLY CONDITION NO. 4 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-102.
AMENDED ON JANUARY 31, 2017, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03.
AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 6 1 2018, PER RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07.
Resolution No. 2021-
Page 36 of 36
From: McKenzie Bright
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, December 7, 2021 1 :05 PM
CityClerk
Subject: RE: CHOA -RHNA/Housing -Council Item #6
Hi -this looks like it is actually a comment on item #4.
Thanks,
McKenzie
From: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 202112:11 PM
To: CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov>
Cc: McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>
Subject: FW: CHOA -RH NA/Housing -Council Item #6
Late correspondence
Ara Michael Mihranian
City Manager
CITVOF l,~CHO PALOS \11:ROES
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
31 0-544-5202 (telephone)
310-544-5293 (fax)
aram@rpvca.gov
www.rpvca.gov
~ Do you really need to print this e-mail?
This e-mail message contains information belonging to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privileged, confidential and/or pmtectecl from
disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If
you received this email in error, or are not an intended recipient:, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
1
DOWNLOAD
'hi~
From: emenhiser@aol.com <emenhiser@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 202111:30 AM
To: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; kristamjohnson@cox.net; alnkathye@msn.com
Subject: Re: CHOA -RH NA/Housing -Council Item #6
Ara:
It was so good to see you at the City event last night, and please pass along my appreciation to the Mayor and the
Council for the wonderful Christmas event.
Per our brief conversation, its my understanding that tonight the Council will be discussing the implications of SB 9 and
the "Our Neighborhood Voices" Initiative (Council Item #6). I hope you will share this email with the Council and let it
serve as a placeholder until the CHOA Board and the full Membership can provide a more formal stance on SB 9 and the
RHNA regulations.
It is my view, and based on conversations with a couple CHOA Board members, that the new State Housing Policy will
undermine the very foundation of the City of Rancho of Rancho Verdes. Local control of land use served as the prime
motivator for the founding of the City in 1973. SB 9 and the follow on RHNA regulations removes local control and
mandates housing that is not in keeping with the traditional character and housing stock of the our City, and I support any
efforts by our City Leaders to oppose these state mandates.
In the very near future, CHOA will end its COVID hiatus, and I look forward to the decisions of our full Board and the
Membership, once they have learned the implications of SB 9 and RHNA implementation.
Also, we appreciate your offer to aid our efforts to educate the community about the impact of SB 9 on the future of our
beloved City.
Dave Emenhiser, President
Council of Homeowner Associations
2
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
McKenzie Bright
Tuesday, December 7, 2021 1 :06 PM
CityClerk
FW: Late Correspondence for Agenda Item #5: Updated Redistricting Maps
20211206 Item S_LC_Draft Redistricting Map Revisions.pdf
Hi -just wanted to make sure this is included in the late correspondence package.
Thank you!
McKenzie
From: McKenzie Bright
Sent: Monday, December 6, 20211:36 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Cc: Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Late Correspondence for Agenda Item #5: Updated Redistricting Maps
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council,
Since the staff report for item #5 pertaining to the redistricting maps was published, the California Citizen's Redistricting
Commission (CRC) and Los Angeles County Redistricting Commission (LACCRC) have updated the maps for public input
on State Assembly and County Supervisorial districts, respectively.
The attached memo outlines the maps as they are currently drafted: staff maintains the recommendation that the
Council support the State Assembly map, and Map B for the County Board of Supervisors.
Additional LACCRC maps are anticipated to be released prior to the Council meeting tomorrow night. Staff will send an
updated memo as soon as the maps are released.
Thank you,
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5305 -mbright@rpvca.gov
Connect with the City from your phone or tablet, download MyRPV.
This e-mail message contains information belonginq to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privile9ed, confidential and/or protected from
disclosure, The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity narned. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If
you 1·cceived this email in error, or are not an intended 1·ecipient, please notify the sender immediately, Thank you for· your assistance and cooperation,
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID-19, visitors are required to wear face coverings
and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the appropriate
department and follow all posted directions during your visit. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
1 5.
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
FROM: ARA MIHRANIAN, CITY MANAGER
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2021
SUBJECT: MODIFIED REDISTRICTING MAPS, AS OF 12/06/21
Staff Coordinator: McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
The following provides updated information pertaining to Item 5 on the December 7, 2021 City
Council agenda : consideration and possible action to take a position on proposed redistricting
maps.
Since the staff report was published on November 30, the California Citizen's Redistricting
Commission (CRC) and Los Angeles County Citizens Redistricting Commission (LACCRC)
have released modified maps for consideration. The table below outlines the maps that have
been changed and assesses the new versions with the City's and South Bay Cities Council of
Governments' (SBCCOG) criteria: that the City be combined with the Peninsula and the
SBCCOG cities (west of the 405 and 110 and south of LAX) and that the SBCCOG is in no
more than two supervisorial districts. The LACCRC has proposed that Maps B-3, F-2, and G-1,
as described below, be elevated for primary consideration, no longer giving such consideration
to the map versions as described in the staff report.
Map Combined West of 405 and 110, SBCCOGinTwo
Peninsula South of LAX Districts
State Assemblv (CRC) Yes Yes N/A
Mao B-3 (LACCRC) Yes Yes Yes
Mao F-2 (LACCRC) Yes No No
Mao G-1 (LACCRC) Yes No Yes
Images of the proposed maps are copied on the following pages.
Staff maintains the recommendation that the City Council support the maps as proposed
by the CRC, and Map B for the LACCRC.
Additional LACCRC maps are anticipated to be released prior to the Council meeting tomorrow
night. Staff will send an updated memo as soon as they are available.
State Assembly (CRC)
Ing le wood
Los AnR_eles
AC\nl~f,ifti &o~1fRATI9rf
Alrpon
Haw t horne
Red ondo
[lea ch Torrance
~o_.:.osn,a.w_nERAT1or,
Il a nc ho
Pa los
Ve r des
AD_l10l A_ITERATION
Name
iSAsanCVAP
% Black C✓AP
% Dev1er1on
%LarnoCVAP
% 'N' ·te CVAP
AD_ADSTHBAY_IT ERAT IO 1
23 .8
5.8
4.3
19.4
49 .2
t D_A Dl BC _ITER:.TIOII
Long
Beach
No
~
AO _r
Map 8 -3 (LACCRC)
Map F-2 (LACCRC)
Fountain
Valley
Hunllngton
Anahei
0
Garden Grove
'
Huntington
Beach
Sa
~an
Map G-1 (LACCRC)
Fullerton
{ I
Anahei
0
Garden Grove
Sa
Huntington
,-, _ --L
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
CITY CLERK
DECEMBER 6, 2021
ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA
Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material received through
Monday afternoon for the Tuesday, December 7, 2021 City Council meeting:
Item No.
1
4
6
Description of Material
Email from Vincent Reher
Sample Petition Form; Email from Del Cerro HOA Board
Emails from: Noel Park; Kathy Edgerton
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Teresa Takaoka
L:ILATE CORRESPONDENCE\2021\2021 Coversheets\20211207 additions revisions to agenda thru Monday.docx
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Late correspondence.:-)
Amy Seeraty
Senior Planner
amys@rpvca.gov
Phone -{310) 544-5231
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Website: www.rpvca.gov
Amy Seeraty
Friday, December 3, 2021 3:45 PM
CityClerk
FW: Update regarding previous complaint
This e-mail message contains information belonging to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privileged,
confidential and/or protected from disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity
named. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, or
are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID-19, visitors are
required to wear face coverings and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. Some employees are working on rotation
and may be working remotely. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the
appropriate department and follow all posted directions during your visit. Walk-ups are limited to one person at a time.
Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff
Directory on the City website.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Reher <vreher@cox.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 5:54 PM
To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov>
Cc: John Cruikshank <John.Cruikshank@rpvca.gov>; Barbara Ferraro <barbara.ferraro@rpvca.gov>; David Turner
<davewturn@aol.com>; Ken Rukavina <krukavina@rpvca.gov>; Octavio Silva <0ctavioS@rpvca.gov>; Thomas W. Frew
<TFrew@ghmp.com>; Steven A. Espolt <SEspolt@ghmp.com>; Nick Resich <nresich@ghmp.com>
Subject: Update regarding previous complaint
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Amy,
1 /.
I met with Nick Resich and Steven Espolt today to discuss the message I had sent in frustration to you last week
regarding my complaint about the operation of a noisy gas-powered leaf blower in front of the Inspiration Slope
Mausoleum. It was a short but productive meeting.
In regard to my concern about Green Hills' lack of response to the complaint: Apparently my emails have been
intercepted not only by RPV's SPAM filtration but also by the one employed by Green Hills. Now those are technical
problems that merit serious attention, but I am satisfied that it is NOT the communications failure that I had been so
concerned about. Short story: the lines of communication are not broken!
In regard to the noise complaint itself: Nick and Steve requested that we try to address this matter by leveraging existing
conditions of approval, such as the limit of 65 decibels sound pressure level as measured at the property line, and
perhaps operating the leaf blower at lower capacity to address the issue. I am in agreement that we should pursue
matters this way before adding new conditions of approval. As such, you may remove any language in the pending
revised conditions that purport to address the complaint.
The Peninsula Verde HOA will NOT be requesting modifications to the conditions of approval in connection to Green
Hills' current request to conduct burials on the rooftop of the Inspiration Slope mausoleum. Of course, we may elect to
do so in the future if we feel that circumstances warrant it.
Sincerely,
Vincent Reher
Peninsula Verde HOA
----------Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Operation of gas-powered leaf blowers around Inspiration Slope Mausoleum
Date: Tuesday 23 November 2021, 10:10:33 am
From: Vincent Reher <vreher@cox.net>
To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov>
CC: John Cruikshank <John.Cruikshank@rpvca.gov>, Barbara Ferraro <barbara.ferraro@rpvca.gov>, David Turner
<davewturn@aol.com>, Ken Rukavina <krukavina@rpvca.gov>, Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov>
Hi Amy,
Reference is made to my earlier complaint about the operation of gas-powered leaf blowers as documented in the
forwarded messages and replies below. I am copying RPV City Council Members Cruikshank and Ferraro, since this
subject had not been discussed during yesterday's site visit and I did not want to take them by surprise.
To date, I have received NO response from the Green Hills management team to either of the emails that I sent to them.
That by itself is of great concern -I consider it to be a setback in what I thought was a cooperative working relationship
between our HOA and GH that started with the Neighborhood Advisory Committee meetings.
Not knowing how to interpret their silence, I have been waiting to see if my complaint was going to be addressed in
some other way. I noticed that they are still operating the leaf blower, but now after 8:00 A.M. I brought the subject
yesterday up in a side conversation with Nick Resich. He stated that the noise ordinance did not apply to them. So now I
have their response.
As you know, I did not want to confuse my specific complaint about Green Hills operations noise with their request to
conduct rooftop burials since they have done such good job of mitigating noise from funeral services and visitors.
Unfortunately, I now have to change that position.
2
According to https://www.rpvca.gov/Faq.aspx?QID=203, "property owner shall conduct its activities on site so as to not
create noise nuisances to neighboring properties ... No noise shall emanate from the property exceeding 65 dBA at the
common property lines". Since this verbiage is apparently not enough to address the current noise nuisance, I will be
asking our HOA Board of Directors to approve a formal request to RPV City Council to amend the Conditions of Approval
to prohibit the use of gas-powered leaf blowers on any portion of Green Hills property proximate to single-family
residential neighborhoods. We will be requesting this change be adapted prior to granting any approval to conduct
mausoleum rooftop burials.
Vince
P.S. Here is a link to a video taken this morning that illustrates the problem: https://we.tl/t-CuprGmpG7y
----------Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: Early morning noise issue around Inspiration Slope mausoleum
Date: Monday 08 November 2021, 1:01:44 pm
From: Vincent Reher <vreher@cox.net>
To: Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov>
CC: Tom Frew <tfrew@ghmp.com>, Nick Resich <nresich@ghmp.com>, Steven Espolt <SEspolt@ghmp.com>, David
Turner <davewturn@aol.com>, Ken Rukavina <krukavina@rpvca.gov>, Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov>
Amy,
The *potential* noise that Dave was referring to centers around visitor and funeral-service related noise. We both
believe that Green Hills has done a good job of mitigating this for Area 4 and desire that they continue to do so for Area
2 generally, and the Inspiration Slope Mausoleum rooftop specifically.
Dave's message sent to you Friday and my supporting message sent to you this morning at 9:43 are in direct response to
the Green Hills request to conduct rooftop burials, and should therefore be considered part of the public comments on
that request.
In regard to the message sent by me to Green Hills last Wednesday and the followup message sent this morning at 7:31
for which you were CC'd: These messages were intended to make Green Hills aware of a particular operational noise
issue. They are not in response to their request to conduct rooftop burials and as such should not be included as part of
the public response to that request.
Thanks,
Vince
On Monday 08 November 2021, Amy Seeraty wrote:
> Hi Vince-
>
> I did not see either of your emails as they got caught in my spam in box. I was just going through that mailbox and saw
both of them. I apologize. I'm guessing the same thing might have happened to the Green Hills folks. Hopefully they
will receive my email.
>
> I'm guessing perhaps the leaf blowers are what Dave was referring to? Or was he referring to more of funeral-related
noise? I just want to make sure I understand both of your concerns so I can appropriately address them in the staff
report. Thank you!
>
> I do see that the Municipal Code Section regarding leaf blowers states:
3
>
> The use or operation of any type of permitted weed and debris blower shall occur between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, or 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on Saturday. The use or operation of any weed and debris
blower is prohibited at all times on Sundays or federal holidays.
>
>
https://library.municode.com/ca/rancho_palos_verdes/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeld=TIT8HESA_CH8.16WEDEBL
>
> Amy Seeraty
> Senior Planner
> amys@rpvca.gov
> Phone -(310) 544-5231
>
> City of Rancho Palos Verdes
> 30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
> Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
> Website: www.rpvca.gov
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Reher <vreher@cox.net>
> Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 7:31 AM
> To: Tom Frew <tfrew@ghmp.com>; Nick Resich <nresich@ghmp.com>; Steven Espolt <SEspolt@ghmp.com>
> Cc: David Turner <davewturn@aol.com>; Amy Seeraty <AmyS@rpvca.gov>
> Subject: Re: Early morning noise issue around Inspiration Slope mausoleum
>
>
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
>
>
>
>
>
> As I sit here at 7.28 A.M. listening to a gas-powered leaf blower being operated at full-blow in front of the Inspiration
Slope mausoleum, I am reminded that I did not receive a reply to the email sent last week. I am re-sending just in case
you did not receive it.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 03 November 2021, Vincent Reher wrote:
>
> > Gentlemen,
>
>>
>
> > I would like to direct your attention to a noise problem that you may not be aware of. The issue centers around the
operation of a gas-powered debris blower in front of the Inspiration Slope mausoleum. The problem typically occurs
early morning between 7:00 -8:00 A.M, and happens 4-6 days per week. The noise issue is exacerbated by the fact that
the blower is frequently operated at full-bore and the fact that the mausoleum building efficiently reflects the resulting
obnoxious loud sound throughout our entire neighborhood. This is a relatively new problem that started last year.
>
4
>>
>
>>You may or may not be aware that the city passed a noise ordinance that went into effect January 2019. Information
about the ordinance as well as a "Commercial Garden Equipment Incentive & Exchange Program" can be found here:
>
>>
>
> > https://www.rpvca.gov/1102/Landscaping-Activities
>
>>
>
>>This issue aside, I would like to commend you on all of your efforts over the past few years to address noise and
other issues that previously plagued the portion of our neighborhood that borders your property. Apart from a few rare
exceptions (mostly caused by visitors), I believe that these efforts have been a resounding success.
>
>>
>
> > Sincerely,
>
>>
>
> > Vincent Reher
>
> > Peninsula Verde HOA
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
5
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
McKenzie Bright
Monday, December 6, 2021 2:48 PM
cc
Ara Mihranian; CityClerk
Late Correspondence Agenda Item #4: Land Use Ballot Initiative Sample Petition Form
20211207 Item 4_L(_Petition Sample.pdf
Good afternoon Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council,
Attached as late correspondence, please find a sample petition form for the Band-Huang-Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use
Initiative. This is in relationship to item #4 on the December 7 agenda.
Thank you,
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5305 -mbright@rpvca.gov
Connect with the City from your phone or tablet, download MyRPV.
This e-mail messilq\: contains information belonqinq to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privileqed, confidential and/or prnt:ecl:ed frorn
disclosure. The infonnation is intended only for use of the individual cw entity llilrnecl. Unauthorized clissel1'lination, distribution, or copyinq is strictly prohibited. If
you received this email in errnr, or are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender imrnecliately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID-19, visitors are required to wear face coverings
and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the appropriate
department and follow all posted directions during your visit. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
1
INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS
The Attorney General of California has prepared the following circulating title and summary of the chief purpose and points
of the proposed measure:
(21-0016Al.) PROVIDES THAT LOCAL LAND-USE AND ZONING LAWS OVERRIDE CONFLICTING STATE LAWS.
INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Provides that city and county land-use and zoning laws (including local housing
laws) override all conflicting state laws, except in certain circumstances related to three areas of statewide concern: (1) the California
Coastal Act of 1976; (2) siting of power plants; or (3) development of water, communication, or transportation infrastructure projects.
Prevents state legislature and local legislative bodies from passing laws invalidating voter-approved local land-use or zoning initiatives.
Prohibits state from changing, granting, or denying funding to local governments based on their implementation of this measure.
Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Fiscal effects of the
measure depend on future decisions by the cities and counties and therefore are unknown.
To the Honorable Secretary of State of California
We, the undersigned, registered, qualified voters of California, residents of ______________ County (or City
and County), hereby propose amendments to the Constitution of California and petition the Secretary of State to submit the same to
the voters of California for their adoption or rejection at the next succeeding general election or at any special statewide election held
prior to that general election or as otherwise provided by law. The proposed constitutional amendments read as follows:
SECTION 1. The people of the State
of California find and declare all of
the following:
(a) The circumstances and envi-
ronmental impacts oflocal land use
decisions vary greatly across the state
from locality to locality.
(b) The infrastructure required to
maintain appropriate levels of public
services, including police and fire
services, parklands and public open
· spaces, transportation, water supply,
schools, and sewers varies greatly
across the state from locality to local-
ity.
(c) Land use decisions made by
local officials must balance devel-
opment with public facilities and
services while addressing the eco-
nomic, environmental, and social
needs of the particular communities
served by those local officials.
(d) Thus, it is in the best interests
of the state and local communities
for these complex decisions to be
made at the local level to ensure that
the specific, unique characteristics,
constraints, and needs of those com-
munities are properly analyzed and
addressed.
( e) Gentrification of housing
adjacent to public transportation
will reduce or eliminate the avail-
ability of low or very low income
housing near public transit,
resulting in the loss of access by
low or very low income persons
to public transit, declines in pub-
lic transit ridership, and increases
in vehicle miles travelled.
(t) The State Legislature cannot
properly assess the impacts upon each
community of sweeping centralized
and rigid state land use rules and zon-
ing regulations that apply across the
state without regard to community im-
pacts and, as a result, statewide land
use and zoning will do great harm
to local communities with differing
circumstances and concerns.
(g) Community development should
not be controlled by state planners,
but by local governments that know
and can address the needs of, and the
impacts upon, local communities.
Local initiatives approved by vot-
ers pertaining to land use and zoning
restrictions should not be nullified or
superseded by the actions of any local
or state legislative body.
(h) Numerous state laws that target
communities for elimination of zon-
ing standards have been enacted,
and continue to be proposed, that
eliminate or erode local control over
local development and circumvent
the California Environmental Quality
Act ("CEQA"), creating the potential
for harmful environmental impacts to
occur.
(i) The purpose of this measure is
to ensure that all decisions regard-
ing local land use controls, includ-
ing zoning law and regulations, are
made by the affected communities
in accordance with applicable law,
including but not limited to CEQA
(Public Resources Code § 21000 et
seq.), the California Fair Employ-
ment and Housing Act (Government
Code§§ 12900 -12996), prohibitions
against discrimination (Government
Code § 65008), and affirmatively
furthering fair housing (Government
Code§ 8899.50). This constitutional
amendment would continue to pro-
vide for state control in the coastal
zone, the siting of a power plant that
can generate more than 50 megawatts
of electricity, or the development or
construction of water, communication
or transportation infrastructure proj-
ects which the Legislature declares
are matters of statewide concern and
are in the best interests of the state.
For purposes of this measure, it is the
intent that a transportation infrastruc-
ture project shall not include a transit-
oriented development project that is
residential; commercial, or mixed-use.
SECTION 2. Section 4.5 is added to
Article XI of the California Constitu-
tion, to read:
SEC. 4.5. (a) Except as provided
in subdivision (b ), in the event of a
conflict with a state statute, a county
charter provision, general plan, spe-
cific plan, ordinance or a regulation
adopted pursuant to a county charter,
that regulates the zoning, development
or use of land within the boundaries of
an unincorporated area of the county
shall be deemed a county affair within
the meaning of Section 4 and shall
prevail over a conflicting state statute.
No voter approved local initiative that
regulates the zoning, development
or use of land within the boundaries
of any county shall be overturned or
otherwise nullified by any legislative
body.
(b) A county charter provision, gen-
eral plan, specific plan, ordinance or
a regulation adopted and applicable
to an unincorporated area within a
county, may be determined only by
a court of competent jurisdiction,
in accordance with Section 4, to
address either a matter of statewide
concern or a county affair if that
provision, ordinance, or regulation
conflicts with a state statute with
regard to only the following:
(!) The California Coastal
Act of 1976 (Division 20
( commencing with Section
30000) of the Public Re-
sources Code), or a succes-
sor statute.
(2) The siting of a power
generating facility capable
of generating more than 50
megawatts of electricity and
the California Public Utili-
ties Commission has deter-
mined that a need exists at
that location that is a matter
of statewide concern.
(3) The development or
construction of a water, com-
munication or transportation
infrastructure project for
which the Legislature has
declared in statute the reasons
why the project addresses a
matter of statewide concern
and is in the best interests of
the state. For purposes of this
paragraph, a transportation
infrastructure project does
not include a transit-oriented
development project, whether
residential, commercial, or
mixed-use.
(c) No modification to appro-
priations for state funded programs
shall occur, and no state grant
applications or funding shall be
denied as a result of the applica-
tion of this section. No benefit or
preference in state appropriations
or grants shall be given to an entity
that opts not to utilize the provi-
sions of this section.
( d) The provisions of this section
are severable. If any provision of
this section or its application is held
invalid, that invalidity shall not af-
fect other provisions or applications
that can be given effect without the
invalid provision or application.
SECTION 3. Section 5.5 is added to
Article XI of the California Constitu-
tion, to read:
SEC. 5.5. (a) Except as provided
in subdivision (b ), in the event of a
conflict with a state statute, a city
charter provision, general plan, spe-
cific plan, ordinance or a regulation
adopted pursuant to a city charter,
that establishes land use policies or
regulates zoning or development
standards within the boundaries of
the city shall be deemed a municipal
affair within the meaning of Section
5 and shall prevail over a conflicting
state statute. No voter approved local
initiative that regulates the zoning,
development or use of land within
the boundaries of any city shall be
overturned or otherwise nullified by
any legislative body.
(b) A city chatter provision, general
plan, specific plan, ordinance or a
regulation adopted pursuant to a city
charter, may be determined only by
a court of competent jurisdiction, in
accordance with Section 5, to ad-
dress either a matter of statewide
concern or a municipal affair if that
provision, ordinance, or regulation
conflicts with a state statute with re-
gard to only the following:
(I) The California Coastal
Act of 1976 (Division 20
(commencing with Section
30000) of the Public Re-
sources Code), or a succes-
sor statute.
(2) The siting of a power
2
generating facility capable
of generating more than 50
megawatts of electricity and
the California Public Utili-
ties Commission has deter-
mined that a need exists at
that location that is a matter
of statewide concern.
(3) The development or
construction of a water, com-
munication or transportation
infrastructure project for
which the Legislature has
declared in statute the reasons
why the project addresses a
matter of statewide concern
and is in the best interests of
the state. For purposes of this
paragraph, a transportation
infrastructure project does
not include a transit-oriented
development project, whether
residential, commercial, or
mixed-use.
(c) No modification to appro-
priations for state funded programs
shall occur, and no state grant
applications or funding shall be
denied as a result of the applica-
tion of this section. No benefit or
preference in state appropriations
or grants shall be given to an entity
that opts not to utilize the provi-
sions of this section.
( d) The provisions of this section
are severable. If any provision of
this section or its application is held
invalid, that invalidity shall not af-
fect other provisions or applications
that can be given effect without the
invalid provision or application.
SECTION 4. Section 7 of Article
XI of the California Constitution is
amended to read:
SEC. 7. (ru A county or city may
make and enforce within its lim-
its all local, police, sanitary, and
other ordinances and regulations
not that are not. except as provided
in subdivision (b), in conflict with
general laws. A county or city may
not supersede or otherwise interfere
with any voter approved local initia-
tive pertaining to land use or zoning
restrictions.
(b) A county or city general plan.
specific plan, ordinance or regula-
tion that regulates the zoning, de-
velopment or use of land within
the boundaries of the county or city
shall prevail over conflicting general
laws, except for only the following:
(A) A coastal land use plan,
ordinance or regulation that
conflicts with the California
Coastal Act of 1976 (Division
20 (commencing with Sec-
tion 30000) of the Public Re-
sources Code), or a successor
statute .
.(fil An ordinance or regula-
tion that addresses the siting
of a power generating facility
capable of generating more
than 50 megawatts of electric-
ity and the California Public
Utilities Commission has
determined that a need exists
at that location that is a matter
of statewide concern.
(C) An ordinance or regula-
tion that addresses the de-
velopment or construction
of a water, communication
or transportation infrastruc-
ture project for which the
Legislature has declared in
statute the reasons why the
project addresses a matter of
statewide concern and is in
the best interests of the state.
For purposes of this sub-
paragraph, a transportation
infrastructure project does
not include a transit-oriented
development project, whether
residential, commercial, or
mixed-use.
(c) No modification to appropria-
tions for state funded programs shall
occur, and no state grant applications
or funding shall be denied as a result
of the application of this section. No
benefit or preference in state appro-
priations or grants shall be given to an
entity that opts not to utilize the provi-
sions of this section.
(d) The provisions of this subdivision
are severable. If any provision of this
subdivision or its application is held
invalid, that invalidity shall not affect
other provisions or a1::iplications that
can be given effect without the invalid
v.rovision or application.
3
INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS
The Attorney General of California has prepared the following circulating title and summary of the chief purpose and points
of the proposed measure:
(21-0016Al.) PROVIDES THAT LOCAL LAND-USE AND ZONING LAWS OVERRIDE CONFLICTING STATE LAWS.
INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Provides that city and county land-use and zoning laws (including local housing
laws) override all conflicting state laws, except in certain circumstances related to three areas of statewide concern: (I) the California
Coastal Act of 1976; (2) siting of power plants; or (3) development of water, communication, or transportation infrastructure projects.
Prevents state legislature and local legislative bodies from passing laws invalidating voter-approved local land-use,or zoning initiatives.
Prohibits state from changing, granting, or denying funding to local governments based on their implemeliiittlon of this measure.
Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and Ioc~,j~~~~nments:
the measure depend on future decisions by the cities and counties and therefore are unknown.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC:
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SEE AN "OFFICIAL TOP FUNDERS" SH
THIS PETITION MAY BE CIRCULATED BY A PAID SIGNATURE GATHERER OR A
effects of
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASK. tf·,, ,, . ,
THE PROPONENTS OF THIS PROPOSED INITIATIVE MEASURE niV:~ THE RIGHT TO WITHl))iAW THIS
PETITION AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE MEASURE QUALij:JJ);S FOR THE BALLOT ...
All signers of this petition must be registered to vote in
1.
Print Name: _____________ _
2.
PrintName; ___________ c..;;,.
Signature:
3.
Residence Address ONLY; ______________ _,
~ig~fiiit_'·-,,.-,,.-----,--------------City: ______________ ---f
Residence Print Name:---. ...... ,,_ __________ _ Address ONLY: ______________ _,
,..._ ________________ City: ______________ --;
Residence Print Name; ______________ _ Address ONLY: ______________ ____,
Signature: _________________ City: ______________ --;
This column for
official use only
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR (To be completed in circulator's own hand after the above signatures have been obtained.)
!, ________________ , am 18 years of age or older.
prmtname)
My residence address is ___________________________ . I circulated this section of the petition
(address,city,s1a1e,zip)
and witnessed each of the appended signatures being written. Each signature on this petition is, to the best of my information and belief, the genuine signature of
the person whose name it purports to be. All signatures on this document were obtained between the dates of _---,(m°"o=m•h, d°"oycc-, Ycc,,cs,)--and --c(m""'occ.mhcc,da""y'""'. Ycc,,cc,) __
I showed each signer a valid and unfalsified "Official Top Funders" sheet. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
true and correct, Executed on ~,~mo~o,~h.~d,y-,y-«•~>-' at __ --,("'pJ,.,,cc,cc0,-cf,~ign=in"°'g) ___ , CA.
Signature of Circulator ____________________ _
(complete signature indicating full nam~ of circulator)
4
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
McKenzie Bright
Monday, December 6, 2021 7:52 AM
Del Cerro HOA; CC
CityClerk
RE: December 7th City Council Meeting Agenda Item #4: Brand-Huang-Mendoza
Tripartisan Land Use Ballot Initiative
Good morning Board Members of the Del Cerro HOA,
The City Council is in receipt of your comments and support for agenda item 4, the Brand-Huang-Mendoza Tri partisan
Land Use Ballot Initiative -thank you. Your comments will also be included as late correspondence.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5305 -mbright@rpvca.gov
Connect with the City from your phone or tablet, download MyRPV.
This e-rnail message contains information belonging to the City of Rancho P,ilos Verdes, which rnay be pr·ivileged, confidential and/or pmtectecl from
disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, OI' copyinq is strictly prohibited. If
you received this email in error, or are not an intencl(\cl recipient, please notify t1·1e sender irnrnecliately. Thank you fo1· your assistance ancl cooperation.
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID-19, visitors are required to wear face coverings
and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the appropriate
department and follow all posted directions during your visit. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
From: Del Cerro HOA <DelCerro_HOA@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2021 7:49 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Cc: McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>
Subject: December 7th City Council Meeting Agenda Item #4: Brand-Huang-Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use Ballot
Initiative
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members,
The Del Cerro community strongly supports the Our Neighborhood Voices voter initiative (aka Brand-Huang-
Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use Ballot Initiative) that would return control of zoning and land use goals and
policies to cities and counties, and we request that the RPV City Council endorse the initiative.
As you are aware, the City's authority and ability to plan and control land use within its borders is being
further eroded with each new legislative session. The cumulative intended result of the laws that have been
passed over the last 4-5 years is to effectively eliminate single family residence zoning throughout California
over time and dramatically increase density in cities such as RPV. Laws recently passed by the California
legislature have no requirements for developers to improve infrastructure, roads or parking in long-
established residential areas to accommodate the increased population -the financial impacts of which will
have to be borne by the cities. Exceptions for high fire hazard areas, where increased traffic and street parking
will undoubtedly slow evacuation, are not provided. The mandated zoning for increased density will sacrifice
green space and trees that provide shade and cool the atmosphere. Although the legislature's stated purpose
is to encourage the building of more affordable housing, very few of the State legislative acts actually require
any affordable housing to be built.
If passed, the voter initiative would return power over land use planning to the City by amending the
California Constitution to provide that a city's general plan or ordinances that regulate zoning, development or
land use within its boundaries would prevail over all conflicting state laws except when they conflict with 3
areas of statewide concern: the California Coastal Act of 1976, siting of power plants, or development of
water, communication, or transportation infrastructure projects. The proposed Constitution amendment
would have the retroactive effect of overriding existing state laws to the extent that they conflict with a city's
zoning and land use decisions within their boundaries.
Our City was formed to take control of land use and allow development according to the priorities of its
residents. Our City has developed a thoughtful, holistic planning and approval process that assures that
development is consistent with the City's General Plan goals and policies, provides a transparent process that
considers public comments, assesses environmental impacts, and addresses any negative impacts such as
stress on aging infrastructure, roads, parking, and parklands -with major decisions made by elected officials
who we can hold accountable for their decisions. Development decisions should be made by the people who
know the City's unique character and challenges best -not controlled by one-size-fits-all regulations enacted
by legislators totally unfamiliar the City.
The Del Cerro community feels strongly that the safety, quality of life and property values of Del Cerro, as a
neighborhood of single-family homes that abuts a natural, undeveloped open space in which at least 3
wildfires have caused neighborhood-wide evacuations through a single exit, will be heavily impacted by the
densification if the existing laws are allowed to stand.
We strongly encourage the Council to officially endorse the Our Neighborhood Voices initiative. We look
forward to actively working to qualify the initiative for the November 2022 ballot and ultimately to assure the
amendment to the California Constitution is passed.
Sincerely,
The Del Cerro HOA Board
Kathy and Al Edgerton
Miriam and Pete Varend
Dion Hatch
Megan and Bob Moore
Gregory MacDonald
Mark Kernen
2
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Good afternoon Mr. Park,
McKenzie Bright
Thursday, December 2, 2021 1:16 PM
noelparkone@gmail.com
CC; Ara Mihranian; CityClerk
RE: 12/7 Council Agenda Item 6
The City Council is in receipt your comments on the Neighborhood Beautification Grant Program -thank you. Your email
will also be included as late correspondence.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright, Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5305 -mbright@rpvca.gov
Connect with the City from your phone or tablet, download MyRPV.
This e--mail message contains information belonging to the City of Rilncho Palos Verdes, which may be 1xivileged, confidential and/or protected from
disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If
you r·eceived this email in error, or ,ll'e not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID-19, visitors are required to wear face coverings
and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the appropriate
department and follow all posted directions during your visit. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel Park <noelparkone@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 202111:52 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>
Subject: 12/7 Council Agenda Item 6
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
I strongly support the proposal to reinstate the Neighborhood Beautification Grant program. I am confident that our
Homeowners Association will be among the first to apply. Thank you for your consideration and for this very positive
initiative.
Noel Park
6715 El Rodeo Road
Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275
562-413-5147
1 (o
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Monday, December 6, 2021 3:39 PM
Nathan Zweizig
FW: December 7th City Council Meeting Agenda Item #6: Neighborhood Beautification
Grant Program
From: Del Cerro HOA <De1Cerro_H0A@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:39 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Cc: McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>
Subject: December 7th City Council Meeting Agenda Item #6: Neighborhood Beautification Grant Program
Honorable Mayor and Council Members,
Del Cerro HOA strongly supports Staff's recommendation to reinstate the Neighborhood Beautification Grant
Program. Del Cerro found the previous program to be very helpful in stretching HOA funds to improve the
neighborhood entry.
The changes to the program that are being recommended are fair and will encourage a broader use of the
funds, while emphasizing projects that will have the widest positive impact on the look of the City.
We look forward to working with Staff as the program is implemented.
Sincerely,
Kathy Edgerton
President
Del Cerro HOA
1