CC SR 20210504 04 - Engineering and Traffic Survey
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 05/04/2021
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business
AGENDA TITLE:
Consideration and possible action to accept the Engineering and Traffic Survey and
establish certain speed limits on various City streets.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
1) Accept the Engineering and Traffic Survey prepared by the City’s Consulting
Traffic Engineer, Willdan Engineering, dated April 2021; and,
2) Adopt Resolution No. 2021-__ approving certain speed surveys and establishing
speed limits in accordance with those surveys on various streets within the City.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: N/A
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): N/A
ORIGINATED BY: Ron Dragoo, PE, Principal Engineer
REVIEWED BY: Ramzi Awwad, PE, Director of Public Works
APPROVED BY: Ara Mihranian, AICP, City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
A. Resolution No. 2021-__ (page A-1)
B. Engineering and Traffic Survey, March 2021 (page B-1)
BACKGROUND:
California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering & Traffic
Surveys (E&T Survey) to establish speed limits on major and arterial streets in order to
enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. These E&T Surveys
must be updated every five or seven years to ensure the speeds reflect current
conditions. The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the
methodology required by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(California MUTCD) dated November 2014.
1
DISCUSSION:
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes ordered its most recent E&T Survey in 2019 to
provide recommended speed limits for 34 street segments in the City (Attachment B).
The E&T Survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to
enable the Sheriff’s Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring
devices for speed enforcement.
The E&T Survey excluded residential districts and school zones (when children are
present) because speed limits in those areas are established on a prima facie basis at
25 mph in accordance with the CVC.
The E&T Survey for the City was conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in
the California MUTCD dated November 2014 and as required by Section 627 of the
CVC. The code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey:
o Measurement of prevailing speed;
o Accident history; and
o Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist.
Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the public from the reckless and
unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a
clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law
(CVC Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway
at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather,
visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a
speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives
motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under
typical driving conditions.
Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be
readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway
conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before
determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with
physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short
zones of less than one-half mile in length are typically avoided to reduce driver
confusion.
The E&T Survey recommends that the streets surveyed remain at the current posted
speed limit except for four street segments. The following table identifies these four
street segments and the recommended changes that will result in the posting of lower
speed limits.
Table 1 – Recommended Speed Changes
2
STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES
No. Street From To Existing New Change
1 CALLE ENTRADERO PALOS VERDES DR W PALOS VERDES DR W 35 30 -5
3 CRENSHAW BLVD CREST RD INDIAN PEAK RD 45 35 -10
12 HAWTHORNE BLVD CREST RD EDDINGHILL DR 45 40 -5
13 HAWTHORNE BLVD EDDINGHILL DR HIGHRIDGE RD 45 40 -5
Staff reviewed the recommended changes with the Sheriff’s Department, which agreed
with all recommendations except for the segment of Crenshaw Boulevard from Crest
Road to Indian Peak Road (Street No. 3). The Sheriff’s Department believes that a
reduction of 5 mph is more appropriate to avoid an abrupt change in speed limits from
an adjacent segment past the City limits. However, Staff supports the recommended
changes to the four roadway segments, including Crenshaw Boulevard from Crest Road
to Indian Peak Road Staff to further reduce speeding. Moreover, the Traffic Safety
Committee (TSC) regularly receive complaints about speeding throughout the City.
Therefore, Staff believes that a lower speed limit on Crenshaw Boulevard from Crest
Road to Indian Peak Road is justified despite the close proximity to a different speed
limit.
A summary of the collision rates for the 34 surveyed street segments is provided in
Table 2 of Attachment B.
Truck Speed Limits
The E&T Survey identified two street segments in the following table with recommended
changes that will result in the posting of increased speed limits for trucks.
Table 2- Recommended Truck Speed Limit Changes
TRUCK SPEED ZONE ON DESCENDING GRADES
35 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 25 40 +15
36 HAWTHORNE BLVD PALOS VERDES DR W RHONE DR 25 45 +20
Staff does not support the recommended changes to the two roadway segments. In
2007, the speed limits in these two locations were reduced from 45 mph to 25 mph.
Collisions were the primary reason for that reduction in speed. Since there have been
no collisions since the installation of the 25-mph speed limit signs, Staff recommends
keeping the posted speed limit at 25 mph.
Although the E&T Survey recommendations are compliant with CVC and California
MUTCD guidelines, the City is not obligated to increase the speed limits. However,
radar equipment cannot be used to enforce the speed limits, but deputies can pace the
segment to enforce the reduced speeds, which would be acceptable to courts. Staff has
coordinated with the Sheriff’s Department, which agrees and intends to enforce speed
limits by pacing trucks on these two segments of roadway.
3
Traffic Safety Committee
The recommendations in this staff report were presented to TSC for its input on April 26,
2021. TSC passed motions recommending that the City Council accept the E&T Survey
and adopt the recommended speed limits, as presented in this staff report.
Steps to Implement Recommended Changes
The following implementation steps are required to safeguard the recommended
changes to the speed limits are in full compliance with state law:
1. City Council adoption of a resolution (Attachment A)
2. City Clerk certification and filing of the resolution with:
a. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Lomita Station
b. Los Angeles County Superior Court, Torrance Superior Court
3. Physical replacement of existing speed limit signs
CONCLUSION:
Having defensible speed zone surveys supported by the courts would allow continued
radar enforcement of the posted speed limit by the issuance of citations. Therefore,
Staff recommends accepting and filing the updated E&T Survey conducted by Willdan
Engineering and adopting Resolution No. 2021-__ establishing certain speed limits in
accordance with surveys on various streets within the City.
ALTERNATIVES:
In addition to the Staff recommendation, the following alternative actions are available
for the City Council’s consideration:
1. Reject the Engineering and Traffic Surveys and direct Staff to perform new
surveys.
2. Take other action, as deemed appropriate.
4
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING CERTAIN
SPEED SURVEYS AND ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE SURVEYS ON
VARIOUS STREETS WITHIN THE CITY.
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 22358.4, 22407 and
40802 of the California Vehicle Code, Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E & T Survey)
have been conducted on various streets within the City by the City's Consulting Traffic
Engineer, Willdan Engineering in accordance with the requirements of the California
Vehicle Code, including Section 627 of said Code; and
WHEREAS, the report and recommendations of the City's Consulting Traffic
Engineer and the speed surveys that were conducted were presented for review and
concurrence by the City's Traffic Safety Committee at its April 26, 2021 meeting. Based
on the information presented to the Traffic Safety Committee, they recommend approval
thereof to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the report and recommendations of the City's Consulting Traffic
Engineer and the speed surveys that were conducted by the Traffic Engineer for the
street segments that are set forth in Attachment B: 2021 Engineering and Traffic
Survey, which is attached hereto as and incorporated herein by this reference, were
presented for review and approval by the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes at a duly noticed meeting thereof on May 04, 2021; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the establishment of speed limits that
are reasonable and safe will facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic within the
City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Speed limits are established on the following streets in accordance
with Section 15.32.010 and 15.32.020 of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Traffic
Ordinance adopted pursuant to Section 10.04.010 of the Rancho Palos Verdes
Municipal Code:
STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES
No. Street From To Existing New Change
1 CALLE ENTRADERO PALOS VERDES DR W PALOS VERDES DR W 35 30 -5
3 CRENSHAW BLVD CREST RD INDIAN PEAK RD 45 35 -10
12 HAWTHORNE BLVD CREST RD EDDINGHILL DR 45 40 -5
13 HAWTHORNE BLVD EDDINGHILL DR HIGHRIDGE RD 45 40 -5
A-1
Section 2. All previous resolutions and orders establishing speed limits on these
roadways within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes are hereby amended to reflect these
speed limits.
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to file certified copies of this
resolution with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office.
Section 4. The speed limits established in Section 1 of this resolution shall
become effective upon posting of the speed limit signs.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this ____ day of May, 2021.
_____________________
Eric Alegria, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Los Angeles ) ss
City of Rancho Palos Verdes )
I, Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby
certify that the above Resolution No. 2021-__ was duly and regularly passed and
adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on May ____,
2021.
___________________________
Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk
A-2
Attachment B
Engineering and Traffic Survey March 2021
A-3
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
Engineering and Traffic Survey
2021
A P R I L
B-1
April 27, 2021
Mr. Ron Dragoo, PE
City Engineer
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275-5391
Subject: 2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
Dear Mr. Dragoo:
As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey to justify
and update the posted speed limits along 34 street segments in the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes. Most of these segments were last surveyed in 2013 and require an update to
comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).
We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures
and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial and collector
street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis.
Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the
Appendices.
The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following
procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California
MUTCD) dated November 2014, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is
intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued
use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.
We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Rancho Palos Verdes and the
assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study.
Very truly yours,
WILLDAN
Vanessa Munoz, P.E., T.E.
Traffic Engineer
Enclosure
B-2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1-2
Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey ....................................... 2-3
SURVEY CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 4
Survey Locations ...................................................................................... 4
Data Collection ......................................................................................... 4
Speed Data ........................................................................................... 4
Collision Data ........................................................................................ 5
Field Review Data ................................................................................. 5
ANALYSIS.................................................................................................. 6
Criteria ...................................................................................................... 6
Results and Recommendations ................................................................ 6-7
Table 1-Street Segments With Recommended Speed Changes ............... 8
Table 2-Summary of Recommendations ................................................... 9-14
Segments with Special Conditions ............................................................ 15-19
LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES ................................................................... 20
Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code ......................................... 20-25
APPENDIX A - Segment Data
APPENDIX B - Radar Speed Distribution Forms
APPENDIX C - Survey Equipment Used
B-3
INTRODUCTION
This Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment,
revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes. This E&T Survey presents recommended speed limits for 34 street
segments in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. E&T Surveys are required by the State of
California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits
using radar or other speed measuring devices. These surveys must be updated every 5 or
7 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle
Code (CVC). The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the
methodology required by The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(California MUTCD) dated November 2014.
The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable
the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devic es for
speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the
prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further
specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to
7 years provided the City’s police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator
course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)]. Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 10 years
if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred
[CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept
reasonably current.
The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in
the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated
November 2014 and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes
three elements of an E&T Survey:
1. Measurement of prevailing speed;
2. Accident history; and
3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist.
Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless
and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a
clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC
Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a
speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the
traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which
endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a
clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving
conditions.
B-4
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers
behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and
competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits
established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the
highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few
individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of
reasonable drivers.
Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily
apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions,
traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.
Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway
conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in
length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.
Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced
without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose
behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for
enforcement.
ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated
November 2014 specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This
methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and
conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&T Survey are
discussed in more detail as follows:
Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar
unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a
statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the
distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th
percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of
the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and
reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a
speed limit is established at the nearest 5 -mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th
percentile speed, except as shown in the two options below.
Options:
1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of
the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would
require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5
mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.
Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).
B-5
If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall
document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons
for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5
The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit crite ria:
A. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in
a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be
established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed.
As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by
5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are
documented in the E&TS.
B. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a
speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established
at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As
indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30
mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are
documented in the E&TS.
C. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a
speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the
speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied.
Collision History
Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher
than average rate of collisions. A segment that has an above-average collision rate
typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.
A summary of the collision rates for the 34 surveyed street segments is provided in Table 2.
Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be
readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are
significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the
basic speed limit. It is important to note that The California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014 recommends exercising great
care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit.
B-6
SURVEY CONDITIONS
SURVEY LOCATIONS
The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected
streets within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The specific location of the radar speed
survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following:
1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.
2. Minimum visibility restrictions.
3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.
4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect
the normal operation of a vehicle.
DATA COLLECTION
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic
collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data
and field reviews were conducted at 34 locations during the months of September and
October 2019 and also in November 2020. Speed data was collected at some locations a
year later than the majority of data due to ongoing construction that affected the speeds
along those segments. Data was collected after construction was completed.
Speed Data
Radar speed measurements were conducted at 34 locations during the months of
September and October 2019, November 2020 and in March 2021. The radar speed
distribution forms are in Attachment B. All surveys were conducted in good weather
conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an
unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically , a minimum
sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were
obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual
segments.
Some speed data was collected in November 2020 and March 2021, during the COVID-19
“Safer at Home Order”. However, the speed counts taken during this time are not
significantly affected by the traffic and travel changes observed due to COVID-19.
B-7
Collision Data
Collision data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated
Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic collision database. For this study, collision
data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2016 to
December 31, 2018. The collision rates for the 34 segments are expressed in accidents
per million vehicle miles (A/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were
collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following
formula to determine the collision rate:
xlxvyear
daystx
AxR
365
000,000,1=
A = Number of midblock collisions over time period
R = Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles)
t = Time Period Covered (in years)
l = Length of Segment (miles)
v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate. The
average statewide collision rates were obtained from 2012 Collision Data on California
State Highways published by Caltrans.
Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with
consideration for the following factors:
1. Street width and alignment (design speed);
2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;
3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;
4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;
5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;
6. Visibility obstructions;
7. Land use and proximity to schools;
8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;
9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and
10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.
B-8
ANALYSIS
CRITERIA
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed lim it in
accordance with several criteria contained in The California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014. Some of the criteria used are:
A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below w hich 85
percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what
the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than
the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits s et lower
than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do
not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph
increment to the 85th percentile speed.
B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the
highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across
the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit
within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that
might require a speed lower than the critical speed.
C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that
can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions,
in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average collision rates
have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for
use in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a
thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street
segment surveyed. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 2. In
each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as
demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper
range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a collision rate significantly higher than
expected was discovered or roadway cond itions not readily apparent to the driver were
identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic
speed limit are fully explained later in this report.
The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical
conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition
readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for
special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section
22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions.
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed
limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie
B-9
speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of CVC).
This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe
having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to
establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.
Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limits
and Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments.
B-10
No. Street From To Existing New Change
1 CALLE ENTRADERO PALOS VERDES DR W PALOS VERDES DR W 35 30 -5
3 CRENSHAW BLVD CREST RD INDIAN PEAK RD 45 35 -10
12 HAWTHORNE BLVD CREST RD EDDINGHILL DR 45 40 -5
13 HAWTHORNE BLVD EDDINGHILL DR HIGHRIDGE RD 45 40 -5
35 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 25 40 +15
36 HAWTHORNE BLVD PALOS VERDES DR W RHONE DR 25 45 +20
NP = Not Posted
PL = Post Limit
TABLE 1
STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES
TRUCK SPEED ZONE ON DESCENDING GRADES
8
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Rancho Palos VerdesB-11
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
CALLE
ENTRADERO
PALOS VERDES
DR W
PALOS VERDES
DR W 370 312.39 22-312.680.92 80 Closest to 85th
Speed30351%
CRENSHAW
BLVD
SEACREST DR CREST RD 3,478 412.39 32-411.460.36 71 Closest to 85th
Speed40402%
CRENSHAW
BLVD
CREST RD INDIAN PEAK
RD 14,155 342.39 24-330.600.43 75 Closest to 85th
Speed35453%
CREST RD HAWTHORNE BLVD CRENSHAW
BLVD 11,449 501.44 42-510.001.56 73 *45454%
CREST RD PALOS VERDES
DR E
GANADO DR 2,586 451.83 36-450.480.73 75 Closest to 85th
Speed45455%
CREST RD GANADO DR RH CITY LIMIT 594 392.39 30-390.000.85 81 Closest to 85th
Speed40406%
CRESTRIDGE
RD
HIGHRIDGE RD CRENSHAW
BLVD 6,637 422.39 33-420.550.5 73 Closest to 85th
Speed40407%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
9
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
**** Truck speed zone on descending grades
B-12
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
FORRESTAL
DR
PALOS VERDES
DR S
NORTH
TERMINUS 1,424 342.39 25-340.000.7 86 Closest to 85th
Speed35358%
GRANVIA
ALTAMIRA
HAWTHORNE BLVD PVE CITY LIMIT 9,088 362.39 26-351.000.2 81 Closest to 85th
Speed35359%
HAWTHORNE
BLVD
PALOS VERDES
DR W
VALLON DR 16,317 501.44 41-500.201.1 77 *454510%
HAWTHORNE
BLVD
VALLON DR CREST RD 16,410 451.44 37-460.501 86 Closest to 85th
Speed454511%
HAWTHORNE
BLVD
CREST RD EDDINGHILL DR 16,592 421.44 33-420.130.85 81 Closest to 85th
Speed404512%
HAWTHORNE
BLVD
EDDINGHILL DR HIGHRIDGE RD 21,751 451.44 36-450.410.81 74 *404513%
HAWTHORNE
BLVD
HIGHRIDGE RD INDIAN PEAK
RD 32,169 391.44 30-390.070.41 75 Closest to 85th
Speed404014%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
10
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
**** Truck speed zone on descending grades
B-13
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
HAWTHORNE
BLVD
SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 25,620 491.44 38-470.300.84 64 California MUTCD
Option 2454515%
HIGHRIDGE
RD
RHE CITY LIMIT HAWTHORNE
BLVD 9,968 332.39 25-340.610.3 89 Closest to 85th
Speed353516%
INDIAN PEAK
RD
RHE CITY LIMIT CRESNSHAW
BLVD 6,265 382.39 28-370.000.35 70 Closest to 85th
Speed404017%
MIRALESTE
DR
VIA COLINITA LA CITY LIMIT 10,572 402.39 26-350.000.21 60 *353518%
MIRALESTE
DR WB
PALOS VERDES
DR E
VIA COLINITA 6,479 372.39 27-360.690.61 68 Closest to 85th
Speed353519%
MIRALESTE
DR EB
PALOS VERDES DR VIA COLINITA 6,747 392.39 28-370.230.58 61 California MUTCD
Option 2353520%
MONTEMALAG
A DR
PVE CITY LIMIT SILVER SPUR
RD 6,407 412.39 32-410.360.79 75 *353521%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
11
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
**** Truck speed zone on descending grades
B-14
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
PALOS
VERDES DR E
PALOS VERDES
DR S
GANADO DR 2,992 422.39 34-433.371.45 78 Closest to 85th
Speed404022%
PALOS
VERDES DR E
GANADO DR DIAMONTE LN 6,565 401.16 32-410.170.83 76 *353523%
PALOS
VERDES DR E
DIAMONTE LN MIRALESTE DR 6,952 362.39 28-370.391 90 Closest to 85th
Speed353524%
PALOS
VERDES DR E
MIRALESTE DR BRONCO DR 10,674 352.39 25-340.141.25 70 *303025%
PALOS
VERDES DR E
BRONCO DR NORTH CITY
LIMIT 11,221 352.39 26-350.461.24 87 *303026%
PALOS
VERDES DR W
NORTH CITY LIMIT HAWTHORNE
BLVD 13,348 511.44 42-510.211 80 *454527%
PALOS
VERDES DR
W/S
HAWTHORNE BLVD TERRANEA
WAY 16,747 481.44 39-480.541.21 76 California MUTCD
Option 2454528%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
12
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
**** Truck speed zone on descending grades
B-15
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
PALOS
VERDES DR S
TERRANEA WY 1500' E/O
SEACOVE DR 14,753 491.44 39-480.391.1 79 California MUTCD
Option 2454529%
PALOS
VERDES DR S
1500' E/O
SEACOVE DR
NARCISSA DR 14,381 421.44 34-431.270.3 86 *353530%
PALOS
VERDES DR S
NARCISSA DR 1300' W/O
SCHOONER DR 14,310 402.39 33-420.641.1 89 *353531%
PALOS
VERDES DR S
1300' W/O
SCHOONER DR
LA CITY LIMIT 15,902 472.39 38-470.191.82 83 *404032%
RIDGEGATE
DR
HAWTHORNE BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD 1,950 312.39 22-310.000.46 80 *252533%
SILVER SPUR
RD
HAWTHORNE BLVD ELKMONT DR 8,326 391.16 31-400.180.62 80 *404034%
HAWTHORNE
BLVD ****
SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 25,620 451.44 36-450.000.84 68 *402535%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
13
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
**** Truck speed zone on descending grades
B-16
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
HAWTHORNE
BLVD ****
PALOS VERDES
DR W
RHONE DR 16,410 511.44 43-520.002.57 61 *452536%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
14
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
**** Truck speed zone on descending grades
B-17
SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per
hour (mph) or more below the critical speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the
driver. Each segment is discussed below.
Segment #4– Crest Road – Hawthorne Boulevard to Crenshaw Boulevard
This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes and a bike lane in
each direction separated by a raised median. The adjacent land use is residential,
undeveloped, and commercial with an ADT of 11,449 vehicles per day. The critical speed is
50 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal
and vertical curves, uncontrolled crosswalks, various hidden side streets that may not be
apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street
segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at
45 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #10– Hawthorne Boulevard – Palos Verdes Dr West to Vallon Drive
This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes and a bike lane in
each direction separated by a raised median. The adjacent land use is residential,
commercial, non fronting civic center, and school with an ADT of 16,317 vehicles per day.
The critical speed is 50 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit.
However, due to horizontal curve with steep downgrade to the south and the high number
of bicyclists, pedestrian, and motorist that share a road that may not be apparent to
unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit
remain at 45 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #13– Hawthorne Boulevard – Eddinghill Drive to Highridge Drive
This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes and a bike lane in
each direction separated by a raised median. The adjacent land use is residential and
commercial with an ADT of 21,751 vehicles per day. The critical speed is 45 mph and
would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to rolling hills with
horizontal curves and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower
speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the
above reasons.
B-18
Segment #18– Miraleste Drive – Via Colinita to LA City Limit
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane separated by two way
left turn lane. There is a bike lane from city limit to 450 feet south of 1st St. The adjacent
land use is residential with an ADT of 10,572 vehicles per day. The critical speed is 40 mph
and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and
vertical curves, moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and
to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It
is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #21– Montemalaga Drive – Palos Verdes East City Limit to Silver Spur Road
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane with a bike lane in each
direction separated by a raised center median. The adjacent land use is residential,
undeveloped and frontage road with an ADT of 6,407 vehicles per day. The critical speed is
41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to rolling
hills with horizontal curves and a narrow roadway, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is
recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #23– Palos Verdes Drive East – Ganado Drive to Diamonte Lane
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction
separated by painted medians. The adjacent land use is residential with a school with an
ADT of 6,565 vehicles per day. The critical speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40
mph posted speed limit. However, due to moderate pedestrian traffic with the lack of
sidewalks, horizontal and vertical curves, various hidden driveways that may not be
apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the
speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #25– Palos Verdes Drive East – Miraleste Drive to Bronco Drive
This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction
separated by a double yellow line and from Marion Drive to Via Canada a painted median.
The adjacent land use is residential with a library and schools with an ADT of 10,674
vehicles per day. The critical speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted
speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, various hidden driveways and
side streets, uncontrolled crosswalks, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be
apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street
segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at
30 mph for the above reasons.
B-19
Segment #26– Palos Verdes Drive East – Bronco Drive to North City Limit
This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction
separated by a double yellow line. The adjacent land use is residential with an ADT of
11,221 vehicles per day. The critical speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph
posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, various hidden
driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity
between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that
the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #27– Palos Verdes Drive West – North City Limit to Hawthorne Boulevard
This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lane and 1 bike lane in each
direction separated by a raised center median. The adjacent land use is residential with an
ADT of 13,348 vehicles per day along. The critical speed is 51 mph and would normally
justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, to maintain uniformity between adjacent
street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit
remain at 45 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #30– Palos Verdes Drive South – 1500’ E/O Seacove Drive to Narcissa Drive
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes and 1 bike lane in
each direction separated by a raised center median. The adjacent land use is residential
and undeveloped zone with an ADT of 14,381 vehicles per day. The critical speed is 42
mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal
and vertical curves, a steep downgrade, and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be
apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the
speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #31– Palos Verdes Drive South – Narcissa Drive to 1300’ W/O Schooner
Drive
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes with a bike lane in
each direction separated by raised center median. The adjacent land use is residential and
undeveloped zone with an ADT of 14,310 vehicles per day. The critical speed is 40 mph
and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and
vertical curves, a steep downgrade, and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent
to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit
remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
B-20
Segment #32– Palos Verdes Drive South – 1300’ W/O Schooner Drive to LA City Limit
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 1 through lane and 1 bike lane in each
direction separated by a raised center median. There are sections that are 1 through lane
and 1 bike lane separated by a double yellow line. The adjacent land use is undeveloped,
residential, and a golf course with an ADT of 15,902 vehicles per day. The critical speed is
47 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal
and vertical curves, a steep downgrade, and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be
apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the
speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #33– Ridgegate Drive – Hawthorne Boulevard to Highridge Road
This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction
separated by a yellow skipped centerline. The adjacent land use is residential with an ADT
of 1,950 vehicles per day. The critical speed is 31 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph
posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, hidden driveways, and moderate
pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is
prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 25 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #35– Hawthorne Boulevard – Silver Spur Road to Rolling Hills Estates City
Boundary (Truck Speed Zone)
Section 22407 of the CVC allows agencies to reduce the speed limit for trucks on
downgrades based on the finding of an engineering and traffic survey. The CA MUTCD
specifies the requirement of an Engineering and Traffic Survey for truck speed zones on
descending grades in Section 2B.13: the segment should have a recorded incident history
of runaway commercial vehicles; a physical profile showing length and gradient and a
downhill speed profile of three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of
10,000 lbs or more will be provided. This segment is currently posted at 25 mph for the
truck speed zone and has two through lanes in each direction separated by a raised
median with an ADT of 25,620 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential with
Palos Verdes Penninsula High School at Silver Spur Road. Between the subject limits, the
vertical downgrade to the south ranges from 1.5%-5.5%. The survey was originally initiated
in 2006 by a serious collision involving a commercial vehicle losing control in the
northbound direction within the subject limits.
The critical speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit.
However due to horizontal curves, a vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian traffic that
may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended
that the truck speed limit for the northbound direction be posted at 40 mph for the above
reasons.
B-21
Segment #36– Hawthorne Boulevard – Rhone Drive to Palos Verdes Drive West
(Truck Speed Zone)
Section 22407 of the CVC allows agencies to reduce the speed limit for trucks on
downgrades based on the finding of an engineering and traffic survey. The CA MUTCD
specifies the requirement of an Engineering and Traffic Survey for truck speed zones on
descending grades in Section 2B.13: the segment should have a recorded incident history
of runaway commercial vehicles; a physical profile showing length and gradient and a
downhill speed profile of three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of
10,000 lbs or more will be provided. This segment is currently posted at 25 mph for the
truck speed zone and has two through lanes and a bicycle lane in each direction separated
by a raised median with an ADT of 16,410 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is
residential with Ryan Park, city hall, and commercial near Palos Verdes Drive West.
Between the subject limits, the vertical downgrade to the south ranges from 2%-9%. The
survey was originally initiated in 2007 by a serious collision involving a commercial vehicle
losing control in the southbound direction within the subject limits.
The critical speed is 51 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit.
However due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, high number of bicyclists, pedestrians
and motorists that share the road that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower
speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the truck speed limit for the southbound
direction be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons. Since the recommended speed for 2
axle vehicles and trucks is the same, it is recommended that the truck speed limit signs get
removed.
B-22
LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES
APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE
SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code:
Section 627.
(a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic
conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for
use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed
necessary by the department, cons ideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
(2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
(c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey , local authorities, in addition to the
factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the
following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of
highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
a. Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the
contiguous property fronting the reon is occupied by 13 or more separate
dwelling houses of business structures.
b. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of
a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more
separate dwelling houses or business structures.
c. The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio
of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the
highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Section 21400.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall revise the Califo rnia Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices, as it read on January 1, 2012, to require the Department of Transportation
or a local authority to round speed limits to t he nearest five miles per hour of the 85th
percentile of the free-flowing traffic. However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be
rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th -percentile speed, the
Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the
speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment, but then the Department of
Transportation or a local authority shall not reduce the speed limit any further for any
reason.
Basic Speed Law
22350. No pe rson shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is rea sonable or
prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the
highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the sa fety of persons or property.
B-23
Speed Law Violations
Section 22351.
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section
22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in
violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in
Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the
defendant establishes by competent evidence th at the speed in excess of said limits did not
constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then
existing.
Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22352.
The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicabl e unless changed as authorized in this
code and, if so changed, only when signs have b een erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the
approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of
the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 fee t in both
directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any
railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible
electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then
indicate the immediate a pproach of a railway train or car.
(2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the
driver’s approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and
unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways
entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except
at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by
official traffic control signals.
(3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district
unless a different speed is determined by local author ity under procedures set forth
in this code.
(2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof,
contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while
children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the
noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or
passing any school grounds which are not separated from the high way by a fence,
gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by childre n and the
highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this
B-24
subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up
to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(3) When passing a senior center or other facilit y primarily used by senior citizens,
contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard
"SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sig n pursuant to this
paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the prop osed signing
should be implemented. A local auth ority may request grant funding from the
Pedestrian Safety Account pursuant to Section 894.7 of the Streets and Highways
Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for
the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the
erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
Increase of Local Speed Limits to 65 Miles Per Hour
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey
that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of
vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a st ate
highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may
by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60
miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, wh ichever is found most
appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The
declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effe ctive when appropriate signs
giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and sha ll not thereafter be revised except
upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25
mile per hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the
grounds thereof or when passing a sen ior center or other facility primarily used by senior
citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date s pecified in subdivision (c) of Section
22366.
Downward Speed Zoning
Section 22358.5.
It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface
conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would
not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient
regulation as to such conditions.
Boundary Line Streets
Section 22359.
With respect to boundary line streets and highw ays where portions thereof are within different
jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any
such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have
approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of
separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
Speed Trap Prohibition
B-25
Section 40801.
No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in
the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in
securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under
this code.
Speed Trap
Section 40802.
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundar ies
marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle
may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known
distance.
(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is pro vided by
this code or by local ordinance under s ubparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358,
or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic
survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and
enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic
device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to
a local street, road, or school zone.
(b)(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as
“local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway
Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. When a street or road
does not appear on the “California Road System Maps,” it may be defined as a “local street
or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the
following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include
official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school
building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a
standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leav ing the school either
during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area
approaching or passing any school grounds that are not s eparated from the highway by a
fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway
is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
(c)(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable
and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully co mpleted a radar
operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the
B-26
course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards
and Training.
(B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving
objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in
subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours
approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C)(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A)
and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in
accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that,
prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that
the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of
subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions
present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of
Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the sp eed of the
accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic
Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior
to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or rada r repair
and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries
marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a v ehicle
may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known
distance.
(B)(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that
is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagra ph (A) of paragraph
(2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357,
22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering
and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the
date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of
radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years.
(II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years
prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates
the section of the highway a nd determines that no significant changes in
roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to,
changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume,
10 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
Speed Trap Evidence
Section 40803.
B-27
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway s hall be admitted in any court
upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the
speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the
maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where
enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed
of moving objects, the prosecution shall estab lish, as part of its prima facie case, that the
evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision
(a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted
within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was
committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section
40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a
speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
B-28
APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data
B-29
B-30Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CALLE ENTRADERO LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR W TO PALOS VERDES DR W City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS 'N.r.~s. Gl SCHOOL .. ~ 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL Palos Verdes Drive West R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOLCROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE 0.92 miles ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. PARKING RESTRICTIONS No parking allowed except in designated areas. STREET WIDTH Varies from 26' to 36' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction. Raised center median entrance treatments at PVDW. Skipped yellow centerline. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk onW/S. Sidewalk on E/S between parallel parking areas. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped land on W/S. Backup residential on EIS. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 370 (September 2019) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 4, 2019 2640' N/0 Palos Verdes Dr AVERAGE SPEED: 25 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 31 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 22-31 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12131/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 1 NO. W/SPEED1NG: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.68 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE-30 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 31 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason. E "
B-31Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CRENSHAW BLVD LIMITS: SEACREST DR TO CREST RD City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS 0 SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK \fJ PARK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 36 MPH Paf'lr PJ St. John Fischer ~ N.T.S. 0.36 miles Rolling with horizontal curve. Parking allowed on the West side S/0 Valley View and parking allowed on the East side N/0 Valley View. 38'-64' One lane in each direction. Raised center median between Crest Rd and Valley View Rd. Skip yellow centerline S/0 Valley View. Concrete or AC sidewalk on both sides. Concrete C&G berm or AC on both sides. W/S is non-fronting residential, view area and a park. EIS is non-fronting residential, undeveloped, with a church and school at Crest Dr. 3,478 (September 2019) September 10, 2019. 150' N/0 Valley View Rd I San Clemente Or CRITICAL SPEED: 41 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 32-41 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1116 to 12/31118 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD. DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.46 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and justifies a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reason. ~ Q. < 00 • "0 ~ .. ""' VI
B-32Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS GJ SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 29 MPH STREET: CRENSHAW BLVD LIMITS: CREST RD TO INDIAN PEAK RD DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: 0.43 miles Ar'5 'f (Double posted in median) Crestridge Rd I Palos Verdes ArtCenter ... Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade to the north. None Varies from 32 ft to 36 ft. One lane in each direction divided by a double yellow line. Edge of pavment with some sections of A. C. berm on both sides. Residential 14,155 (September 2019) September 10, 2019. 850' N/0 Crest Rd. CRTICIAL SPEED: 34 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 24-33 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 4 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD,DRUNK,H&R: 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE-45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 34 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason.
B-33Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS(SW,C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 46 MPH STREET: CREST RD LIMITS: HAWfHORNE BLVD TO CRENSHAW BLVD DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: Cresta Verde Dr ~ I N.T.S. 1.56miles Rolling with horizontal curves. No Stopping Anytime on both sides, Hawthorne Blvd to Crenshaw Blvd. 80' Two lanes and bike lanes in each direction separated by a raised center median; numerous tum pockets. Concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter on both sides. Backup residential, undeveloped; Commercial on SIW comer of Whitley Collins Dr,; Calif. Water Co E/0 High ridge Rd on N/S. 11 ,449 (September 2019) September 10, 2019. 700' E/0 Highridge Rd. CRITICAL SPEED: 50 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 42-51 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12131/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 50 mph and would nonnally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, uncontrolled crosswalks, various hidden side streets that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain unifonnity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph. E 0
B-34Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CREST RD LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR EAST TO GANADO DR ~--------------,---------------------------~--------------~----~----------~ City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1·1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK W13·1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (OATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 41 MPH Marymount k College:~ G) if· ~ 0.73miles s=?ZE N.T.S. Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. Parking allowed on both sides. 64' Two lanes in each direction separated by double yellow centerline. Mira Catalina Elementary School G) School Zone Concrete C&G on both sides. Sidewalk on the W/S b/t Lucania Dr and Ganado Dr and on E/S b/t PVDE and Starline Dr. Backup and fronting residential on the E/S. Undeveloped, backup residential and school on the WIS. 2,586 (September 2019) September 5, 2019. 900' N/0 Palos Verdes Dr E. CRITICAL SPEED: 45 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 36-45 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 1 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.48 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.83 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason.
B-35Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS @ SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 34 MPH STREET: CREST RD LIMITS: GANADO DR TO ROLLING HILLS CITY LIMIT N/0 PASEO DE PINO DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: \ Radar Towers \ 'S?'ZI!! N.T.S. 0.85 miles Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. No Stopping Any Time on both sides from 200 ft N/0 Ganado Dr to north city limit. 30'-52' Two lanes in each direction to 200ft N/0 Ganado Dr, then one lane in each direction separated by RPM skip stripe centerline. on Undeveloped and non-fronting residential. A few fronting residence at the northerly end of the segment. 594 (September 2019) September 5, 2019. 250' S/0 Avenida de Rosa. CRITICAL SPEED: 39 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 30-39 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1116 to 12131118 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reason.
B-36Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS @ SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STREET: CRESTRIDGE RD LIMITS: HIGHRIDGE RD TO CRENSHAW BLVD DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: 401.. R1-1 r \@ \ \ Ridgecrest lntermidiate School N.T.S. Palos Verdes Art School DISTANCE 0.5 miles ;: 1------------------------r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------te : ALIGNMENT Rolling with slight horizontal curves. VI PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides. Red, white, blue curb marking in front of Peninsula Community Church. STREET WIDTH 64' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction with a two-way left-tum lane. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on S/S; SWon N/S bit Highridge Rd and 950ft W/0 Crenshaw Blvd. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup school and assisted living. Intermittent religious and undeveloped lots. PV Art Center at Crenshaw Blvd. ~ ~----------------------r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------i~ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,637 (September 2019) .. .-----------------------r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------i~ SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 6, 2019. 300' W/0 Crenshaw Blvd. ] AVERAGE SPEED: 37 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 42 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 33-42 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12131/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD, DRUNK. H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reason.
B-37Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS 0 SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK \f/ PARK STREET: FORRESTAL DR LIMITS: PALOS VEDES DR SOUTH TO NORTH TERMINUS DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: Ladara Linda Community Center and Montessori School of RPV SVZI!! N.T.S. 1: .-----------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~ DISTANCE 0.7 miles ALIGNMENT Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides. STREET WIDTH 40' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction; skip yellow centerline. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on the west side; none on the east side. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential on east side; Fronting residential N/0 PVDS and school/community center N/0 Pirate Dr on west side. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1,424 (September 2019) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 5, 2019. 400' S/0 Pirate Dr. AVERAGE SPEED: 30 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 34 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 25-34 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12131118 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 34 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason.
B-38Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOLCROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGESPEED: 31MPH STREET: GRANVIA ALTAMIRA LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BL TO PALOS VERDES ESTATES CITY LIMIT DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ ...-.~ .... N.T.S. 0.2 miles Downgrade to the north with horizontal curve. SIGNATURE: I I I Yellow, Red, and Green curb on the east side. Red and Green curb on the west side. 60'-64' One lane in each direction separated by a raised median from 280 ft to 700 ft N/0 Hawthorne Blvd. Raised median from Moreno Dr to 70 ft. Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on both sides. Backup residential. Commercial on both sides at Hawthome Blvd. 9,088 (September 2019) September 6, 2019. 400' N/0 Hawthorne Blvd. CRITICAL SPEED: 36 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 26-35 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 111/16 to 12131/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE-35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason.
B-39Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK PARK W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOG) AVERAGE SPEED: 45 MPH STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR WEST TO VALLON DR DATE: 4/27/21 N.T.S. 1.1 mile ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: City Hall Note : Hawthorne Blvd is considered a north/south roadway for the purpose of this study Horizontal curve with steep downgrade to the south. No Parking Anytime on both sides. No Stopping Anytime at Via Rivera on w/s. 80' -88' Two lanes and bike lane in each direction separated by a raised median. Scenic Tum-Out Concrete C&G on both sides. SW on EIS bit PVDW to 350' NIO Via Capri, W/S bit PVDW and Via Rivera and 380' S/0 Vallon Dr, both sides. Backup residential on W/S. Multi-unit on EIS Via Rivera. Non-fronting Civic and educational on E/S near CH. Commercial at PVDW. 16.317 (September 2019) September 6, 2019. 2640' W/0 Vallon Or. CRITICAL SPEED: 50 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 41-50 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 4 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 HBD.DRUNK,H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.20 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE-45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 50 mph and would nonnally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves with a steep downgrade to the south, and the high number of bicyclists, pedestrians and motorists that share the road that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason.
B-40Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK \f) PARK 40 1~ W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (OATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 41 MPH STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: VALLON OR TO CREST RD DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: 1.0mile Los Verdes Golf Course Rolling with steep downgrade at south end of segment. Horizontal curves. No Parking Anytime on both sides. 80' E?ZE N.T.S. Backup residential. Multi-unit residential S/0 Los Verdes Dr on the WIS. Commercial on theW/Sat Crest Rd. 16,41 0 (September 2019) September 6, 2019. 400' N/0 Los Verdes Dr. CRITICAL SPEED: 45 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 37-46 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 9 NO. W/SPEEDING: 4 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.50 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed Is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason.
Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN -s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK --\f) PARK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: CREST RD TO EDINGHILL DR DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: ~ ~ ~ !a. 0.85 miles Rolling with horizontal curves. No Parking Anytime on both sides. 80' Two Janes and bike lane in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous tum pockets. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) I Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on both sides. ~ ~ "' I~ s=?ZI!!! N.T.S. 1 FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped, backup single-family residential; multi-unit residential at Ocean Crest Dr on W/S . • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 16,592 (September 2019) ., . ~ .9 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOG) September 6, 2019. 450' S/0 Indian Valley Rd. ~ AVERAGE SPEED: 38 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 42 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 33-42 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12131/181 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEDlNG: 0 HBD,DRUNK,H&R: 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.13 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE-45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit be changed to 40 mph for the above reason. B-41
B-42Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK \f) PARK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 40 MPH STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: EDDINGHILL DR TO HIGHRIDGE RD DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ I San Nicholas Dr N.T.S. 0.81 miles Rolling with horizontal curves. No Parking Anytime on both sides. 80' SIGNATURE: I Granvia Altamira • considered a north/south roadway for the purpose of this study (double posted ~ in median) ~ *"0 a/ ~~ 7~$ ri'o~ (j Two lanes and bike lane in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous tum pockets. Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on both sides. Backup residential. Commercial on W/S at Granvia Altamlra. Hawthome Frontage Rd located on the W/S S/0 Grayslake Rd. 21,751 (September 2019) September 6, 2019. 400' S/0 San Nicholas Dr. CRITICAL SPEED: 45 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 36-45 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 8 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 HBD. DRUNK, H&R: 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.36 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to rolling hills with horizontal curves and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be changed to 40 mph for the above reason.
B-43Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS ~ SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 34 MPH STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: HIGHRIDRGE RD TO INDIAN PEAK RD DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ N.T.S. 0.41 miles Rolling with horizontal curve. No Stopping Anytime on both sides. No Parking Anytime EIS. 80' I I ~I ~~~ /~ roadway for the purposes of this study / Two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median. Bike route on both sides. Concrete curb and gutter on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on the EIS; sidewalk on the w/s from Shorewood Rd to northerly. Backup residential. Commercial at limits. Hawthorne frontage road on the W/S bit Shorewood Rd. and Grayslake Rd. 32,169 (September 2019) September 4, 2019. 450' E/0 Grayslake Rd. CRITICAL SPEED: 39 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 30-39 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 111116 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 1 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.13 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons.
B-44Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CITY LIMIT DATE: 4/27/21 0.84 miles ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ Palos Verdes Peninsula HS RHE ----------------------RPV Horizontal curves with steep downgrade to the north. SIGNATURE: ,-------\, : \ \ \ : School Zone \ Trucks I I I I ' I E/S: No Stopping Any Time at Silver Spur. W/S: No Stopping Any Time btwn N/0 Blackhorse and Silver Spur. 80' N.T.S. NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous turn pockets. ~ ~----------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~ IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. W/S: SW from Silver Spur to 100ft N/0 Blackhorse. EIS: SW first 100ft from Silver Spur to Blackhorse. ~ FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped land and back-up residential. High School on W/S at Silver Spur Rd. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 25,620 (September 2019) SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) September4, 2019. 2640' N/0 Silver Spur Rd. AVERAGE SPEED: 45 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 49 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 38-47 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 111116 to 12131/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 7 NO. W/SPEEDING: 2 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.30 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 49 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCO methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason.
B-45Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOLCROSSWALK CROSSWALK STREET: HIGHRIDGE RD LIMITS: ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CITY LIMIT TO HAWTHORNE BLVD DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: I ~~~ ·b<f \ ~<:: I ~0 I R1-1 u \ Ridgecrest Intermediate School E I I :lii~E?~Z~I!!~-~ ~ ., N.T.S. .c .-----------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~ DISTANCE 0.3 miles ~ ~----------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-1~ ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. ~ PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Stopping Any Time on both sides. STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS(SW,C&G) 0 "' FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Commercial at northem limits. Undeveloped, multi-residential frontage on both sides. Church N/0 Peacock Ridge Rd on east side.~ ._----------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 9,968 (September 2019) .. ._----------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~s SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 4, 2019. 500' S/0 Hawthorne Blvd. ~ AVERAGE SPEED: 30 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 33 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 25-34 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES ~ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.61 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES .-----------------------------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------~~ EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH ~ "' .------------------------r----------------------------L---------------------------------------------------~ COMMENTS The 85th percentile speed is 33 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
B-46Engineering & Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS Gl SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK STREET: INDIAN PEAK ROAD LIMITS: ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CITY LIMIT TO CRENSHAW BLVD DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: E 0 "' Indian Peak Road 40~ 1 DISTANCE 0.35 miles :l .-----------------------r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------t~ ALIGNMENT Downgrade from Crenshaw Blvd. Westerly. .:: PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Stopping Any Time on both sides. STREET WIDTH Varies from 37' to 63'. NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction, partial raised median, partial2-way tum lane . .-----------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------------------~ ... IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike path on south side. ~ FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped on south side, except for a school at Crenshaw Blvd intersection. Retail shopping on east side. ~ ~----------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------------------~8 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,265 (September 2019) !! ~----------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~ SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 6, 2019. 2640' N/0 Crenshaw Blvd. ;_ AVERAGE SPEED: 33 MPH CRTICIAL SPEED: 38 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 28-37 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16-1212 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.0 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE:2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons.
B-47Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOLCROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN STREET: MIRALESTE DR LIMITS: VIA COLINITA TO LA CITY LIMIT DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: Chandeleur Dr 0.21 miles Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. Parking allowed on both sides except for No Stopping Any Time from 1st St to 405 ft south. Varies from 66' to 70' One lane in each direction with TWL TL. Bike lane from City limit to 450 ft S/0 1st St on E/S; to N/0 Rich Ln on WIS. EiiZE!!S N.T.S. -0:: 0 E "" .. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Via Colinita to 1st St; W/S edge of pavement, EIS C&G. 1st St to Chandeleur Dr; W/S C&G w/SW, E/S edge of pavement and AC. ~ FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Single and multi-unit residential. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 10,572 (September 2019) SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) September 5, 2019. 400' N/0 1st St. AVERAGE SPEED: 33 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 40 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 26-35 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBD, DRUNK. H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.0 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
B-48Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS(SW,C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 32 MPH STREET: MIRALESTE DR EB LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST TO VIA COLINITA DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: 0.61 miles Rolling with horizontal curves. Parking allowed on both sides, except for limited red curb at Via Bramante and Via Colinita. Varies from 28 to 32 ft per direction of travel. EIB direction at higher elevation than W/B direction. One lane in each direction separated by a center parkway, except for two lanes eastbound from PVDE to Via Bramante. Concrete or AC curb on outside of lanes; limited amount of curb on inside (parkway) side. Commercial development and fire station at PVDE. Residential frontage on both sides. 6,479 (September 2019) September 5, 2019. 400' N/0 Via Siena. CRITICAL SPEED: 37 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 27-36 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 3 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.69 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE:2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
B-49· Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK W13·1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS(SW,C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 33 MPH STREET: MIRALESTE DR WB LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST TO VIA COLINITA DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: 0.58 miles Rolling with horizontal curves. Parking allowed on both sides, except for limited red curb at Via Bramante and Via Colinita. Varies from 28 to 32 ft per direction of travel. EIB direction at higher elevation than W/B direction. One lane in each direction separated by a center parkway, except for two lanes eastbound from PVDE to Via Bramante. Concrete or AC curb on outside of lanes; limited amount of curb on inside (parkway) side. Commercial development and fire station at PVDE. Residential frontage on both sides. 6,747 (September 2019) September 5, 2019 400' NJO Via Siena. CRITICAL SPEED: 39 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 28-37 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12131118 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 1 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 HBD, DRUNK. H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.23 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE:2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCO methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph Increment below the 85th percentile speed. It Is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason.
B-50Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK G CROSSING GUARD DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 36 MPH STREET: MONTEMALAGA DR LIMITS: PALOS VERDES ESTATES CITY LIMIT TO SILVER SPUR RD DATE: 4/27/21 \ I I \ 0.79 miles ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ Rolling with horizontal curves. Parking allowed on both sides. 64' SIGNATURE: 6 Silver Spur ~ Elementary One lane and one bike lane in each direction separated by a raised center median. N.T.s. Concrete C&G on both sides. SW on SIS btwn Silver Spur and 50' W/0 Basswood and on N/S btwn Basswood and 1 ,200' W/0 Grayslake. Backup and fronting residential on S/S, E/0 Basswood Ave. Undeveloped and frontage road on 5/S, W/0 Basswood. 6,407 (September 2019) September 4, 2019. 650' W/0 Grayslake Rd. CRITICAL SPEED: 41 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 32-41 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/6 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD. DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.36 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to rolling hills with horizontal curves and a narrow roadway, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason.
B-51Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN 2511.. W13-1 SPEED WARNING r' SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 39 MPH STREET: PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH TO GANADO DR DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ N.T.S. 1.45 miles Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade to the south. No parking allowed on both sides except at scenic turnouts. Parking restricted at scenic turnouts from 1 Opm -Sam. Varies from 30 ft to 34 ft. One lane in each direction divided by double yellow line. Edge of pavement with sections of A. C. benn on both sides. Undeveloped land. 2,992 (September 2019) September 5, 2019. 2640' E/0 Palos Verdes DrS. CRTICIAL SPEED: 42 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 34-43 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 111116 to 1213111 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 16 NO. WISPEEDING: 10 HBD,DRUNK,H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.36 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. E 0
B-52Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST LIMITS: GANADO DRIVE TO DIAMONTE LANE City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE:.~~-') ---MAP SYMBOLS ~ .J/so " .~0 I ..... <><:' @ ~ ~ t::' COLLEGE .rs ·'&~ E ~">: """" ~ ~ v'(j .$! 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL Crest Road ~ ~§ ~ ...! E I U') ~5 Q:' i::J!I N ~ (") IS' Palos Verdes Drive East R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN -.-~ ~ .... ... 45 R2-1 SPEED SIGN @ :~,~ _._ 35~ .t (") '"';' "' 30 1~ ~ ~ ..... I ~ W13-1 SPEED WARNING Marymount ~ & <D 0:: ~ SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN ~~ ~ ~ College ~ l !II <?,.. CD c ~~ :::l .. --% i: E s SCHOOL CROSSWALK ~ 01 ~ --=' --~ /f; 0 ·~ CROSSWALK ~ ~· N.T.S. ·---(I) .. ... ·~ DISTANCE 0.83 miles :c • E "' ALIGNMENT Horizontal and vertical curves. • ~ PARKING RESTRICTIONS No parking allowed on both sides from Ganado Dr. to 200' N of Casilina Dr. ~ I STREET WIDTH Varies from 54 ft. to 68 ft. ~ NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Ganado Dr. to Casilina Dr.-11ane in ead1 direction With merge lanes. 200' SIO Crest Rd. to Calle Aventura-21anes in each direction. Calle Aventura to Oiamonte Ln.-11ane in each direction. ~ Painted medians • Ganado Dr. to 200' soulh of Crest Rd. Raised medians-200' south of Crest Rd. to San Ramon Dr. Painted medians and double yellow line • San Ramon Dr. to Diamonte Ln. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G • west side Granada Dr to Casillna Or. Concrete C&G and sidewalk-west side CasiUna Dr. to 200' N/0 Crest Rd. Concrete C&G -east side Miraleste College to ~ 400' SfO Calle Aventura. Concrete C&G -east side 400' SfO Calle Aventura to 500' N/0 Calle Aventura. Street tiQhts at intersections of Crest Rd and Calle Aventura. Q N FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Residential and School ~ U) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,565 (September 2019) e .. " 0 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) MARCH 25, 2021. 1 000' EJO Diamonte Ln. ·;; " d: AVERAGE SPEED: 36 MPH CRTICIAL SPEED: 40 MPH l 10 MILE PACE: 32-41 MPH ~ I 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1116 to 12131/181 TOTAl MID-BLOCK ACC: 1 I NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 I I :~ PREDOMINANT: BROADSIDE HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ~ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.17 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.16 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES • J; w EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH ~ The 85th percentile speed Is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit However, due to moderate pedestrian traffic with the I COMMENTS lack of sidewalks, horizontal and vertical curves, and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is ! prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
B-53Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL s R1-1 STOP SIGN R2-1 SPEED SIGN W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT I PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH STREET: PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST LIMITS: DIAMONTE LANE TO MIRALESTE DR DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: E 0 "' 1.0mile Horizontal and vertical curves. None Varies from 27 ft to 30 ft NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction divided by a double yellow line. ~ ~----------------------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~m IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Edge of pavment with sections of A. C. berm on both sides. Concrete C&G and sidewalk on east side-Miraleste Pl. to Miraleste Dr. 2 FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Residential ~ ~----------------------~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,952 (September 2019) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 5, 2019. 200' S/0 Via Subida. AVERAGE SPEED: 33 MPH CRTICIAL SPEED: 36 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 28-37 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 1213111 TOTAL MID·BLOCK ACC: 3 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE • 35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
B-54Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS GJ/G:l SCHOOL I LIBRARY 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL .... L. FLASHING BEACON ..,-r WITH ASSEMBLY "CM R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN 30 II.. W13-1 SPEED WARNING r SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 30 MPH STREET: PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST LIMITS: MIRALESTE DR TO BRONCO DR DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ ..s.,fll .... :9. 6% Miraleste~ % 0 Kindergarten ~ :;-. School ~ ~~I!? N.T.S. 1.25 miles Horizontal and vertical curves. No parking allowed along west side from Via Canada to Marion Dr. and east side from Via Canada to Colt Rd. Varies from 30 ft to 32 ft. One lane in each direction devided by a double yellow line. Painted Medians from Marion Dr. to Via Canada. Coral Ridge Rd. Concrete C&G -east side Residential. High school on NIVV comer of Via Canada. Kindergarten school on N/E comer of Via Canada. Library on NIVV comer of Marion Dr. 10,674 (September 2019) September 6, 2019. 700' S/0 Colt Rd. CRTICIAL SPEED: 35 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 25-34 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/1 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.14 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE-30 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -30 MPH The critical speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, various hidden driveways and side streets, uncontrolled crosswalks, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above reasons.
B-55Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS (iJ SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 31 MPH STREET: PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST LIMITS: BRONCO DR TO NORTH CITY LIMIT DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: N.T.S. 1.24 miles Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade to the north. None Varies from 32 ft to 36 ft. One lane in each direction divided by a double yellow line. Edge of pavment with some sections of A. C. benn on both sides. Residential 11,221 (September 2019) September 10, 2019. 350' N/0 Sunnyside Ridge Rd. CRTICIAL SPEED: 35 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 26-35 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 7 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.46 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -30 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -30 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above reasons.
B-56Engineering & Traffic Survey STREET: PALOS VERDES DR WEST LIMITS: NORTH CITY LIMIT TO HAWTHORNE BLVD. City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE:~~-'\ F---I ""'--' MAP SYMBOLS G) !!! SCHOOL a. E ::J 2 1'1:1 1{\0~0 ~ Cll 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL cc ~~~, .... 0· ~ !f:::. Cll I ~~~ N.T.S. ::J R1-1 ~ cr& ~· -8 0:: ~"·-r ;;; R1-1 STOP SIGN ~ ~ ~eQt· in median) (Double posted ~ R1·1 ~ 0 R1·1 .... " T 4~ in median) ... 45 ~ 35 ~ s,.!.1 c.. '< R2-1 SPEED SIGN r R1·1 Palos Verdes Drive West -~45 "' --_LR1-1 Iii' ~ s SCHOOL CROSSWALK ~1 R1-1 • • --~-.t: ~ rf-4s ........ Ill --CROSSWALK 1:: ~(') " --E ~. ~~ ~ 41e,. o..GI ~ D~tl61'ite ~ 0 'il ~ DISTANCE 1.0mile 1:: .. E ALIGNMENT Generally flat with slight curves N/0 Berryhill Dr. ... ; "" PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking prohibited on both sides. :;: ~ I STREET WIDTH 102ft except 104ft N/0 Crenshaw; divided road with 39ft wide median. 2 NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN 2 thru lanes and 1 bike lane in each direction, Raised medians w/ openings at intersections and midblock. ~ IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete curb and gutter on both sides. Sidewalk or path on west side S/0 Marguerite Dr. ~ ~ FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Non-fronting residential, with a few private driveways. [ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 13,348 (September 2019) ;:: .. :I 0 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 6, 2019. 2640' N/0 Via Vicente. > ~. AVERAGE SPEED: 48MPH I CRTICIAL SPEED: 51 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 42-51 MPH ~ 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16-12131/18 I I I PREDOMINANT: SIDESWIPE I HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ~ TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 3 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 l;; ., ACCIDENT RATE: 0.20 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES > Ill ... .... EXISTING SPEED ZONE-45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45MPH ~ The 85th percentile speed is 51 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, to maintain uniformity between adjacent street I COMMENTS ~ segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons. ~
B-57Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: PALOS VERDES DR WEST/SOUTH LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BLVD TO TERRANEA WY City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE:~·..:.., A.l\ I --_, .• ·~~ f -MAP SYMBOLS ~ (iJ SCHOOL E (Double poslad ~ I ~~ ~ 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL in median) 45 cro~ l\) N.T.S. I R1-1 ~ f' R1-1 STOP SIGN ~ f'< 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN Q ~ I 1"':~ "' --?\~ ~ s SCHOOL CROSSWALK ~~los " --~ --v6,.01 45 . 0 sou~ CROSSWALK i-.; " --.........:: ~ Of\-J ~ 45 E "' i ~ -~ .... ""~ ~ • t1) ~ 0) DISTANCE 1.21 MILES !:: .. E "' ALIGNMENT Several vertical curves with moderate grades. ~ F.: PARKING RESTRICTIONS N.S.A.T. and N.P.A.T. on both sides. ~ I STREET WIDTH Varies from 105ft to 114ft. I NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes and a bike lane in both directions with wide dirt median, partially landscaped. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Curb and gutter, no sidewalk except at signalized intersections and from Hawthorne Blvd. to approx. 1000 ft southerty. ~ FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Mix of non-fronting residential and undeveloped south of the shopping center at Hawthome Blvd. IN' ~ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 16,747 (September 2019) F .. ::1 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOG) September 4, 2019. 900' W/0 Terranes Way. ·$ .. .t AVERAGE SPEED: 45MPH I CRITICAL SPEED: 48MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 39-48 MPH 0 .... I 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16-12/31/18 I I I PREDOMINANT: HIT OBJECT I HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 1 ~ TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 12 NO. W/SPEEDING: 2 i';: .. ACCIDENT RATE: 0.54 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES ~ I!! EXISTING SPEED ZONE-45MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45MPH ~ a: The 85th percentile speed is 48 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD ' COMMENTS .., methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th .... .., Gl percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons. ~
B-58Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 45 MPH STREET: PALOS VERDES DR S LIMITS: TERRANEA WAY TO 1500' E/0 SEACOVE DR DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: N.T.&. 1.1 miles Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade approx. 800 ft E/0 Narcissa Dr No Stopping Anytime on both sides. Varies from 30 to 32 ft in areas divided by raised median per direction of travel. Varies 35 to 36 ft in areas with no raised median. Undeveloped and backup residential. 14,753 (September 2019) September 4, 2019. 2640' E/0 Terranea Way. CRITICAL SPEED: 49 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 39-48 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12128/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 7 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE-45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE-45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 49 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, Option 2 of the 2012 california MUTCD methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons. N
B-59Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 STOP SIGN R2-1 SPEED SIGN SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) STREET: PALOS VERDES DR S LIMITS: 1500' E/0 SEACOVE DR TO NARCISSA DR DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: N.T.S. 0.3 miles Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade approx. 800 ft E/0 Narcissa Dr No Stopping Anytime on both sides. Varies from 30 to 32 ft in areas divided by raised median per direction of travel. Varies 35 to 36 ft in areas with no raised median. AVERAGE SPEED: 38 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 42 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 34-43 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12131/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 6 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.27 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed Is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, a steep downgrade, and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
B-60Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 STOP SIGN R2-1 SPEED SIGN SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) STREET: PALOS VERDES DR S LIMITS: NARCISSA DR TO 1300' W/0 SCHOONER DR DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: N.T.S. 1.1 miles Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade approx. 800 ft E/0 Narcissa Dr No Stopping Anytime on both sides. Varies from 30 to 32 ft in areas divided by raised median per direction of travel. Varies 35 to 36 ft in areas with no raised median. E 0 .... 9. ~ 1: ., E "' J! FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped and backup residential. ~ ._----------------------~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~8 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 14,310 (September 2019) .. ._----------------------~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~5 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 5, 2019. 700' EIO Peppertree Dr. l AVERAGE SPEED: 37 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 40 10 MILE PACE: 33-42 MPH ~ .--------------------------,--------~-----------r------------------,-----~--------------~------------------~~ 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 11 NO. W/SPEEDING: 3 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 I:: ._------------------------~---------------------L----~~----------~--------------------L-------------------~ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.64 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES ~ .---------------------------------------------------------or-----------------------------------------------------~~ EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves and vertical curves, a steep downgrade, and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
B-61Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOLCROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATEJLOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 43 MPH STREET: PALOS VERDES DR S LIMITS: 1300' W/0 SCHOONER DR TO LA CITY LIMIT DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: Palos Verct es Dr East N.T.S. 1.82 miles Rolling with Horizontal curves. No Stopping Anytime on both sides, except for scenic view tum outs with designated time limit parking. Undeveloped and backup residential. Golf course on S/S of PVDS. 15,902 (September 2019) September 5, 2019. 2640' W/0 Forrestal Dr. CRITICAL SPEED: 47 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 38-47 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 111/16 to 12131/18 TOTAl MID-BLOCK ACC: 6 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.19 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 47 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves and vertical curves, a steep downgrade, and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons.
B-62Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS \iJ PARK 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 25 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 27 MPH STREET: RIDGEGATE DR LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BLVD TO HIGHRIDGE RD DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ N.T.S. 0.46 miles R1-1 \iJ Mira Verde Pvt. Park Downgrade to the west at Hawthorne Blvd. Flat with horizontal curves between Ridgecove Ct and Highridge Rd. Parking allowed on both sides, except for red curbs at intersections. 40' One lane in each direction separated by a yellow skip centerline, with 4" white edge line. Sidewalk, concrete curb and gutter on both sides. Multi-unit residential. 1,950 (September 2019) September 4, 2019. 550' W/0 Highridge Rd. CRITICAL SPEED: 31 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 22-31 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID·BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE:2.39 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -25 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -25 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 31 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, hidden driveways, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 25 mph for the above reasons.
B-63Engineering & Traffic Survey STREET: SILVER SPUR ROAD LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BLVD TO ELKMONT DR ~--------------~~--------------------------~----------------~------------------~ City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: 8 ~A'5: A~ MAP SYMBOLS (iJ SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN --s SCHOOL CROSSWALK ----CROSSWALK --Peninsula High School ...AJ' '"'\---:-(' \ -~ 1------------------------~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~ DISTANCE 0.62 miles j .__A_L-IG_N __ M_E_N_T--------------~-R-o-1-lin_g_t-ena __ i_n_w_/_so_m_e--ve-rt-ica--l-cu_N_e_s_.-D-ow--ng_rn_d_e_rr_o_m __ H_a_wfu __ o_m_e_B_Iv-d-.-in_b_o-~--di_re_ct_i-on-s------------------------~~ 1------------------------~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~--~--~~~~~~~----~~~~~~~~~--~--~~ PARKING RESTRICTIONS Mized N.S.A.T. and No Parldng 6-8:30AM ,SchooL Days, Loading Zone, adjacent to school, NP Loading Zone on west side, Edgeline delineating panting on east :c. side N/0 school and on west side S/0 Basswood. o!l .-----------------------~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=---------------------------------------------------------~. STREET WIDTH Varies from 28ft to 60ft ..., ~------------------~-------------------------------------------------------------------t~ NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes SB, one or two lanes NB. Left tum lanes at signalized intersections and at school driveways. ~ .-----------------------~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~m IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides. ~ IN FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Non-fronting residential/ school N/0 Hawthorne, non_fronting residential/ shopping S/0 Hawthorne. ..... .------------------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~ S! AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 8,326 (September 2019) .-----------------------~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~ SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) September4, 2019. 2640' N/0 Hawthorne Blvd. ;, AVERAGE SPEED: 35 MPH I CRITICAL SPEED: 39 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 31-40 MPH ~ .-------------------------~--------~----------~------------------~--~~--------------~------------------~m 3-YEARACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16-12/31/18 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 0 I NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 I PREDOMINANT: SIDESWIPE I HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 t 1--------------------------~---------------------L----~r-----------~--------------------~-------------------t ACCIDENT RATE: 0.18 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.16 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES ~ .-----------------------------------------------------~~----------------------------------------------------~~ EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH ~ 1------------------------~r---------------------------~~----------------------------------------------------~ COMMENTS The 85th percentile speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason.
B-64Truck Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CITY LIMIT DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: ,-----~\ : \ \ \ : School Zone \ Trucks 0.84 miles Horizontal curves with steep downgrade to the north. I I I I I , I E/S: No Stopping Any Time at Silver Spur. W/S: No Stopping Any Time btwn N/0 Blackhorse and Silver Spur. 80' , , , I , I N.T.S. NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous tum pockets. ~ ~----------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~.~ IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. W/S: SWfrom Silver Spur to 100ft N/0 Blackhorse. EIS: SW first 100ft from Silver Spur to Blackhorse. ~ FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped land and back-up residential. High School on W/S at Silver Spur Rd. ~ .-----------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~:~ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 25,620 (September 2019) , .-----------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~5 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 9, 2019. 850' N/0 Silver Spur Rd. ~ AVERAGE SPEED: 40 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 45 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 36-45 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/16 to 12/31/18 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 .-------------------------~------------------_.------~----------._------------------~------------------~ .. ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES J. .-----------------------------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------~;~ EXISTING TRUCK SPEED ZONE -25 MPH PROPOSED TRUCK SPEED ZONE -40 MPH 6': .-----------------------~----------------------------~--------------------------------------------------~~ COMMENTS The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However due to horizontal curves, a vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the truck speed limit for the northbound direction be posted at 40 mph for the above reasons. ~ .., 0> 0
B-65Truck Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes MAP SYMBOLS ~ SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN --s SCHOOL CROSSWALK ----CROSSWALK --\fJ PARK W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR WEST TO RHONE DR DATE: 4/27/21 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE:~ Truck~~ Los Verdes Dr R1-1 R1·1-l ~1)0 Trucks use...._ 40 r t ~ !l>e D. lower gear ~j ,..g~dian '1' Alta Vista _ _., u; R1_1~ ,.._Dupre Dr ~' 11~ ~i... Robert Ryan\D7 '~o -~ 'Y1,1 9'"~ Park ~ on . 3 ..L o .. ..-; J... median 45 45 t :6 't''t. ~ \/a\\Ofl 0..!..-·~ : ~ ,-45r 4 •~ 5 ~ ~ > V' C i~~~ Trucks use .1~5 . j ~ ~ Ia apn l~er gear -{ruck Scemc ~ (ij 35 .. .tkoff\e aNd Tum-Out I ~ a... -r ~~~~\-\:a~c:··'':::: ~ ~ .. _....,._._ Crestmont Ln N.r.s. '"' \ City Hall..,...k1-1 ~ .---~~------------------~~--------------------------~~--~~~----------------------------------------------------1' 351~ DISTANCE 1.90 mile ~ ~------------------------~~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1~ ALIGNMENT Horizontal curve with steep downgrade to the south. ~ PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Parking Anytime on both sides. No Stopping Anytime at Via Rivera on w/s. ~ .-------------------------~~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1, STREET WIDTH 80'-88' 2 NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes and bike lane each direction separated by a raised median bit Rhone Dr and Dupree Dr. Two lanes only on each direction separated by raised median/median ~ banier bit Dupree Dr and Vallon Dr. Two lanes and bike Jane in each direction separated by raised median/median banier bit Vallon Dr and PVDNW. -Conaete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on theWIS and 115' S/0 Dupree DrEIS at bus stop. intermittent path on the EIS. ~ IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Conaete C&G on both sides. Sidewalk on EJS btl PVDW to 350' N/0 Via Capri, WIS bit PVDW and V1a Rivera and 380' SIO Vallon Dr, both sides. ~ FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential. Multi-unit residential s/o Los Verdes Dr on the WIS. Commercial on theW/Sat Crest Rd. 5' Backup residential on WIS. Multi-unit on EJS NIO Via Rivera. Non-fronting Civic and educational on EIS near CH. Commercial at PVDW. ~ ~ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 16,410 (September 2019) ., ~------------------------~~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1.~ SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 9, 2019. 2640' W/0 Vallon Dr. ~ AVERAGE SPEED: 47 MPH I CRITICAL SPEED: 51 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 43-52 MPH ~ I ._a._v_EA __ R_A_c_c_I_D_E_N_T_D_A_TA_:_1_11_11_s_to __ 121--31-/1_s_.)'--T-O_T_AL __ M_I_D-_B_L_o_c_K_A_c_c_: _o __ ___,~('--N_o_._w_I_SrP-EE_D_I_N_G_: _o ____ ____.I~....-___ P_R_E_o_o_M_IN_A_TE __ :_N_IA _____ ~....-I_H_Bo_._o_R_u_N_K_,_H_&_R_: _o ______ -tr;.; ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.44 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES ~ EXISTING TRUCK SPEED ZONE -25 MPH PROPOSED TRUCK SPEED ZONE-45 MPH ~ .------------------------,r---------------------------~~----------------------------------------------------~ COMMENTS The 85th percentile speed is 51 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, high number of bicyclists, pedestrians and motorists that share the road that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the truck speed limit for the southbound direction be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons.
APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms
B-66
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16 2
17
18 1
19
20
21
22 7
23 4
24 6
25 7
26 4
27 1
28 2
29 3
30
31 5
32 1
33 3
34 1
35 2
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 49 16 - 35 25 mph 31 mph 22 - 31 39 80%6% / 3 15% / 7
SPEED PARAMETERS
Calle Entradero/Via Vicente 2640' N/O Palos Verdes Dr
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
9/4/2019
Project #: 19-5499-001
Calle Entradero/Via Vicente from Palos Verdes Dr W to Palos Verdes Dr W
0 5 10
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-67
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 2
26 3
27 3
28 5
29 7
30 6
31 9
32 10
33 13
34 15
35 14
36 18
37 15
38 17
39 17
40 13
41 10
42 8
43 6
44 2
45 4
46 2
47
48 1
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 200 25 - 48 36 mph 41 mph 32 - 41 142 71%17% / 35 12% / 23
SPEED PARAMETERS
Crenshaw Blvd 150' N/O Valley View Rd/San Clemente Dr
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:15-13:15
9/10/2019
Project #: 19-5499-002
Crenshaw Blvd from SeaCrest Dr to Crest Rd
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-68
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:45 MPH Clear/Dry Project #:19-5499-003
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 6
23 8
24 8
25 9
26 10
27 11
28 11
29 13
30 12
31 15
32 12
33 12
34 7
35 4
36 5
37 3
38 4
39 1
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 151 22 - 39 29 mph 34 mph 24 - 33 113 75%9% / 14 16% / 24
SPEED PARAMETERS
Crenshaw Bvld 850' N/O Crest Rd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
9:00-11:00
9/10/2019
Crenhaw Blvd from Crest Rd to Indian Peak Rd
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-69
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31 3
32 2
33 4
34 7
35 9
36 10
37 14
38 16
39 17
40 17
41 17
42 17
43 16
44 18
45 11
46 8
47 5
48 6
49 4
50 2
51
52 1
53
54 1
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 205 31 - 54 41 mph 45 mph 36 - 45 153 75%12% / 25 14% / 27
SPEED PARAMETERS
Crest Rd 900' N/O Palos Verdes Dr E
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
14:00-16:00
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-005
Crest Rd from Palos Verdes Dr E to Ganado Dr
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-70
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 1
27 2
28 2
29 3
30 6
31 8
32 9
33 10
34 8
35 8
36 9
37 11
38 6
39 4
40 5
41 2
42 2
43 1
44
45
46
47 1
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 98 26 - 47 34 mph 39 mph 30 - 39 79 81%8% / 8 12% / 11
SPEED PARAMETERS
Crest Rd 250' S/O Avenida De Rosa
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-006
Crest Rd from Ganado Dr to RH City Limit
0 5 10 15
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-71
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 1
28 3
29 4
30 7
31 7
32 12
33 15
34 17
35 16
36 18
37 18
38 17
39 17
40 15
41 15
42 13
43 8
44 6
45 6
46 3
47 2
48 1
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 221 27 - 48 37 mph 42 mph 33 - 42 161 73%15% / 34 12% / 26
SPEED PARAMETERS
Crestridge Rd 300' W/O Crenshaw Blvd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
9/6/2019
Project #: 19-5499-007
Crestridge Rd from Highridge Rd to Crenshaw Blvd
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-72
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 1
24 4
25 8
26 10
27 11
28 12
29 16
30 17
31 15
32 14
33 13
34 8
35 8
36 6
37
38 1
39
40 1
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 145 23 - 40 30 mph 34 mph 25 - 34 124 86%3% / 5 12% / 16
SPEED PARAMETERS
Forrestal Dr 400' S/O Pirate Dr
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-008
Forrestal Dr from Palos Verdes Dr S to North Terminus
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-73
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 2
24 1
25 5
26 11
27 15
28 18
29 21
30 22
31 23
32 22
33 14
34 11
35 9
36 9
37 7
38 5
39 3
40 4
41 1
42 2
43
44 1
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 206 23 - 44 31 mph 36 mph 26 - 35 166 81%3% / 8 16% / 32
SPEED PARAMETERS
Granvia Altamira 400' N/O Hawthorne Blvd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
9/6/2019
Project #: 19-5499-009
Granvia Altamira from Hawthorne Blvd to PVE City Limit
0 5 10 15 20 25
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-74
DATE:10/29/20 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:10:37AM 10:53AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):PALOS VERDES DRIVE W AND VALLON DR
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:SCENIC OUTLOOK VISTA POINT
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 1 0 1
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 X 1 0 1
57 X X 2 0 2 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X X X 2 1 3
53 X X X X 2 2 4 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X X 2 1 3
51 X X X X X X 5 1 6
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
49 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 9 12
47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6 19
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10 23 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 14 20
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 85TH %:50 49 50 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 1 5 6
38 X X X X X 2 3 5 50TH %:45 44 45 M.P.H.
37 X X X 2 1 3
36 X 1 0 1 15TH %:41 40 41 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 0 0 0 *10 MPH PACE:42 - 51 40 - 49 41 - 50 M.P.H.
33 0 0 0 *
32 0 0 0 P % IN PACE:76%80%77%
31 X 1 0 1 A
30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE:9%12%10%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:15%8%13%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:46 45 45 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:23 15 19
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.21 0.14 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.46 0.38 0.30 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 110 217
RADAR
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD
B-75
DATE:10/29/20 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:01AM 11:17AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):VALLON DR AND CREST RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:RHONE DR/HAWTHORNE BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X X 1 1 2
49 X X X X X 4 1 5
48 X X X X X 2 3 5
47 X X X X 2 2 4
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4 16
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6 19
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10 25 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 14 22 85TH %:46 45 45 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 14 21 50TH %:43 40 41 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X 1 9 10
36 X X X X X X 2 4 6 15TH %:39 37 38 M.P.H.
35 X X X 1 2 3 *
34 X X X 1 2 3 *10 MPH PACE:38 - 47 37 - 46 37 - 46 M.P.H.
33 X 0 1 1 *
32 X 0 1 1 P % IN PACE:89%84%86%
31 0 0 0 A
30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE:6%6%7%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:5%9%6%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:43 41 42 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:11 13 13
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.10 0.12 0.06
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.32 0.34 0.24 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
108 108 216
RADAR
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD
B-76
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 1
34 2
35 3
36 3
37 5
38 6
39 8
40 10
41 15
42 16
43 18
44 17
45 18
46 14
47 14
48 14
49 13
50 12
51 9
52 9
53 4
54 1
55 1
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 213 33 - 55 45 mph 50 mph 41 - 50 151 71%17% / 38 12% / 24
SPEED PARAMETERS
Hawthorne Blvd 450' S/O Indian Valley Rd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
14:00-16:00
9/6/2019
Project #: 19-5499-012
Hawthorne Blvd from Crest Rd to Eddinghill Dr
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-77
DATE:10/29/20 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:51AM 12:10PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):EDDINGHILL DR AND HIGHRIDGE RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:SAN NICOLAS DR/HAWTHORNE BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 1 0 1
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X X X 2 1 3
49 X X X X X 2 3 5
48 X X X X X X 5 1 6
47 X X X X 3 1 4
46 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16
44 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12 25
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 17 25 85TH %:46 43 45 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 14 23 50TH %:40 40 40 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 15TH %:35 36 36 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 *10 MPH PACE:37 - 46 36 - 45 36 - 45 M.P.H.
33 X X X X 2 2 4 *
32 X X X X X X 5 1 6 P % IN PACE:68%81%74%
31 X X 0 2 2 A
30 X 1 0 1 C % OVER PACE:10%7%12%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:22%12%14%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:40 40 40 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:24 15 20
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.19 0.13 0.08
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.44 0.36 0.29 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
124 118 242
RADAR
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD
B-78
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 4
28 9
29 12
30 13
31 17
32 20
33 22
34 19
35 21
36 19
37 15
38 14
39 13
40 12
41 8
42 6
43 5
44 2
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 231 27 - 44 34 mph 39 mph 30 - 39 173 75%10% / 25 15% / 33
SPEED PARAMETERS
Hawthorne Blvd 450' E/O Grayslake Rd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
9/4/2019
Project #: 19-5499-014
Hawthorne Blvd from Highridge Rd to Inidan Peak Rd
0 5 10 15 20 25
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-79
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 2
34 6
35 6
36 7
37 9
38 12
39 10
40 14
41 14
42 13
43 15
44 16
45 15
46 11
47 12
48 9
49 11
50 8
51 8
52 3
53 2
54 1
55 1
56 2
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 207 33 - 56 43 mph 49 mph 38 - 47 132 64%14% / 30 22% / 45
SPEED PARAMETERS
Hawthorne Blvd 2640' N/O Silver Spur Rd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
14:00-16:00
9/4/2019
Project #: 19-5499-015
Hawthorne Blvd from Silver Spur Rd to RHE City Limit
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-80
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 1
23 3
24 5
25 9
26 14
27 21
28 24
29 28
30 27
31 26
32 24
33 21
34 12
35 7
36 4
37 2
38 2
39 2
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 232 22 - 39 30 mph 33 mph 25 - 34 206 89%3% / 9 8% / 17
SPEED PARAMETERS
Highridge Rd 500' S/O Hawthorne Blvd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:00-13:00
9/4/2019
Project #: 19-5499-016
Highridge Rd from RHE City Limit to Hawthorne Blvd
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-81
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 2
24 2
25 4
26 7
27 9
28 10
29 14
30 13
31 15
32 18
33 17
34 17
35 15
36 15
37 12
38 9
39 10
40 5
41 6
42 2
43 4
44 1
45 1
46
47 1
48
49 1
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 210 23 - 49 33 mph 38 mph 28 - 37 146 70%11% / 24 20% / 40
SPEED PARAMETERS
Indian Peak Rd 2640' N/O Crenshaw Blvd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:30-13:30
9/6/2019
Project #: 19-5499-017
Indian Peak Rd from RHE City Limit to Crenshaw Blvd
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-82
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 1
24 3
25 4
26 11
27 8
28 13
29 13
30 13
31 14
32 14
33 11
34 12
35 12
36 11
37 8
38 9
39 8
40 7
41 6
42 5
43 7
44 4
45 5
46 2
47
48
49 1
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 202 23 - 49 33 mph 40 mph 26 - 35 121 60%3% / 8 37% / 73
SPEED PARAMETERS
Miraleste Dr 400' N/O 1st St
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:45-14:16
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-018
Miraleste Dr from Via Colinita to LA City Limit
0 5 10 15
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-83
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 1
21
22 1
23
24 3
25 3
26 5
27 8
28 4
29 9
30 7
31 9
32 7
33 9
34 7
35 3
36 6
37 5
38 5
39 3
40 2
41 1
42 1
43 2
44 1
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 102 20 - 44 32 mph 37 mph 27 - 36 69 68%12% / 13 20% / 20
SPEED PARAMETERS
Miraleste Dr 400' N/O Via Siena
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound Spot Speeds
14:32-16:00
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-019
Miraleste Dr from Palos Verdes Dr E to Via Colinita
0 2 4 6 8 10
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-84
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 1
21
22 1
23 1
24 3
25 4
26 5
27 5
28 5
29 8
30 3
31 9
32 6
33 9
34 6
35 8
36 7
37 6
38 4
39 4
40 2
41 4
42 2
43 2
44 2
45
46
47 1
48 1
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 109 20 - 48 33 mph 39 mph 28 - 37 67 61%18% / 20 21% / 22
SPEED PARAMETERS
Miraleste Dr 400' N/O Via Siena
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Southbound Spot Speeds
14:32-16:00
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-019
Miraleste Dr from Palos Verdes Dr E to Via Colinita
0 2 4 6 8 10
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-85
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 1
28 1
29 2
30 9
31 12
32 15
33 16
34 17
35 18
36 18
37 19
38 15
39 14
40 12
41 14
42 7
43 5
44 7
45 2
46 3
47 2
48 2
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 211 27 - 48 36 mph 41 mph 32 - 41 158 75%11% / 25 14% / 28
SPEED PARAMETERS
Montemalaga Dr 650' W/O Grayslake Rd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:30-11:30
9/4/2019
Project #: 19-5499-020
Montemalaga Dr from PVE City Limit to Silver Spur Rd
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-86
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 4
30 5
31 6
32 7
33 8
34 9
35 13
36 14
37 16
38 17
39 20
40 22
41 22
42 16
43 13
44 8
45 5
46 3
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 208 29 - 46 39 mph 42 mph 34 - 43 162 78%14% / 30 8% / 16
SPEED PARAMETERS
Palos Verdes Dr E 2640' E/O Palos Verdes Dr S
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:30-13:30
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-021
Palos Verdes Dr E from Palos Verdes Dr S to Ganado Dr
0 5 10 15 20 25
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-87
DATE:03/25/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:44AM 10:29AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):GANADO DR AND DIAMONTE LN
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PALOS VERDES DR EAST/DIAMONTE LN 1000'
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 1 0 1
46 X X X 2 1 3
45 X X X X 1 3 4
44 X X X X X 5 0 5
43 X X 1 1 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9
41 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 1 15 85TH %:40 39 40 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 12 28
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 50TH %:37 36 36 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8 23
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 14 27 15TH %:32 32 32 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 13 26 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 *10 MPH PACE:32 - 41 30 - 39 32 - 41 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15 P % IN PACE:76%78%76%
31 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 C % OVER PACE:10%14%10%
29 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 E
28 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *% UNDER PACE:14%9%14%
27 X X X 3 0 3 *
26 X 0 1 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:37 36 36 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:20 17 19
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.14 0.17 0.08
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.37 0.41 0.28 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
143 103 246
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
TO
PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST
B-88
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 1
25 1
26 3
27 6
28 11
29 14
30 20
31 20
32 22
33 23
34 22
35 22
36 19
37 14
38 8
39
40 1
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 207 24 - 40 33 mph 36 mph 28 - 37 187 90%5% / 11 5% / 9
SPEED PARAMETERS
Palos Verdes Dr E 200' S/O Via Subida
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:00-13:00
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-023
Palos Verdes Dr E from Diamonte Ln Miraleste Dr
0 5 10 15 20 25
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-89
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 1
21 2
22 5
23 5
24 9
25 11
26 14
27 16
28 16
29 20
30 15
31 17
32 16
33 13
34 10
35 10
36 9
37 6
38 6
39 4
40 1
41 2
42 2
43
44 1
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 211 20 - 44 30 mph 35 mph 25 - 34 148 70%10% / 22 20% / 41
SPEED PARAMETERS
Palos Verdes Dr 700' S/O Colt Rd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:07-13:43
9/6/2019
Project #: 19-5499-024
Palos Verdes Dr E from Miraleste Dr to Bronco Dr
0 5 10 15 20 25
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-90
DATE:10/29/20 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 9:26AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):BRONCO DR AND NORTH CITY LIMIT
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PALOS VERDES DR EAST/HEADLAND DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X X 2 0 2 85TH %:35 34 35 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 X X X 1 2 3 50TH %:31 31 31 M.P.H.
37 X X 1 1 2
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 15TH %:27 27 27 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 4 20 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 *10 MPH PACE:26 - 35 27 - 36 26 - 35 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 12 24 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 11 30 P % IN PACE:90%85%87%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10 30 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12 29 C % OVER PACE:8%6%9%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 15 31 *% UNDER PACE:3%10%4%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4 17 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:31 31 31 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
24 X X 2 0 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE:11 15 12
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.07 0.14 0.05
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.27 0.37 0.22 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
154 105 259
PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST
RADAR
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
B-91
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39 4
40 2
41 6
42 10
43 9
44 14
45 15
46 17
47 14
48 24
49 23
50 17
51 19
52 10
53 6
54 7
55 3
56 2
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 202 39 - 56 48 mph 51 mph 42 - 51 162 80%5% / 12 14% / 28
SPEED PARAMETERS
Palos Verdes Dr 2640' N/O Via Vincente
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:45-15:45
9/6/2019
Project #: 19-5499-026
Palos Verdes Dr W from North City Limit to Hawthorne Blvd
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-92
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34 2
35 1
36 3
37 3
38 11
39 12
40 11
41 9
42 10
43 15
44 21
45 20
46 22
47 18
48 15
49 9
50 11
51 5
52 2
53 1
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 201 34 - 53 45 mph 48 mph 39 - 48 153 76%9% / 20 14% / 28
SPEED PARAMETERS
Palos Verdes Dr 900' W/O Terranea Way
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:30-13:30
9/4/2019
Project #: 19-5499-027
Palos Verdes Dr W/S from Hawthorne Blvd to Terranea Wy
0 5 10 15 20 25
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-93
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35/45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35 1
36
37 4
38 6
39 10
40 6
41 7
42 18
43 21
44 22
45 20
46 20
47 21
48 17
49 8
50 6
51 6
52 6
53 1
54 3
55 1
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 204 35 - 55 45 mph 49 mph 39 - 48 162 79%5% / 11 16% / 31
SPEED PARAMETERS
Palos Verdes Dr 2640' Mile E/O Terranea Way
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:45-15:45
9/4/2019
Project #: 19-5499-028
Palos Verdes Dr S from Terranea Wy to 1500' E/O Seacove Dr
0 5 10 15 20 25
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-94
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 2
34 6
35 9
36 7
37 7
38 13
39 7
40 11
41 9
42 6
43 9
44 3
45 7
46 2
47 1
48 1
49
50 1
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 101 33 - 50 39 mph 43 mph 34 - 43 84 83%1% / 2 15% / 15
SPEED PARAMETERS
Palos Verdes Dr 700' W/O Narcissa Dr
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-029
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-95
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 1
31 2
32 6
33 16
34 18
35 22
36 23
37 17
38 22
39 27
40 18
41 8
42 8
43 7
44 2
45 2
46 1
47 1
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 201 30 - 47 37 mph 40 mph 33 - 42 179 89%4% / 9 7% / 13
SPEED PARAMETERS
Palos Verdes Dr 700' E/O Peppertree Dr
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:20-13:20
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-030
Palos Verdes Dr S from Narcissa Dr to 1300' W/O Schooner Dr
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-96
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35 2
36 6
37 6
38 13
39 17
40 15
41 18
42 18
43 21
44 18
45 22
46 13
47 11
48 4
49 8
50 3
51 3
52 1
53 1
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 200 35 - 53 43 mph 47 mph 38 - 47 166 83%7% / 14 10% / 20
SPEED PARAMETERS
Palos Verdes Dr 2640' Mile W/O Forrestal Dr
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:45-15:45
9/5/2019
Project #: 19-5499-031
Palos Verdes Dr S from 1300' W/O Schooner Dr to LA City Limit
0 5 10 15 20 25
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-97
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 2
20 2
21 7
22 10
23 11
24 15
25 14
26 13
27 14
28 15
29 13
30 13
31 10
32 8
33 9
34
35 3
36 2
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 161 19 - 36 27 mph 31 mph 22 - 31 128 80%6% / 11 14% / 22
SPEED PARAMETERS
Ridgegate Dr 550' W/O Highridge Rd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
14:00-16:00
9/4/2019
Project #: 19-5499-032
Ridgegate Dr from Hawthorne Blvd to Highridge Rd
0 5 10 15 20
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-98
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 2
26 3
27 4
28 4
29 5
30 8
31 12
32 13
33 20
34 21
35 19
36 21
37 20
38 15
39 14
40 10
41 5
42 4
43 4
44 1
45 1
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 206 25 - 45 35 mph 39 mph 31 - 40 165 80%12% / 26 8% / 15
SPEED PARAMETERS
Silver Spur Rd 2640' N/O Hawthorne Blvd
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:00-14:00
9/4/2019
Project #: 19-5499-033
Silver Spur Rd from Hawthorne Blvd to Elkmont Dr
0 5 10 15 20 25
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-99
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:45 MPH Cloudy/Sunny
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 2
24 3
25 1
26 4
27 2
28 2
29 4
30 6
31 5
32 2
33 6
34 4
35 6
36 12
37 9
38 14
39 19
40 16
41 19
42 23
43 14
44 17
45 9
46 6
47 7
48 5
49 4
50 1
51 2
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 224 23 - 51 40 mph 45 mph 36 - 45 152 68%20% / 47 12% / 25
SPEED PARAMETERS
Hawthorne Blvd 850' N/O Silver Spur Rd
City of Rolling Hills Estates
Northbound Spot Speeds
09:00-14:00
9/9/2019
Project #: 19-5501-034
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-100
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE:Location:
TIME:Posted Speed:45 MPH Cloudy/Sunny Project #:19-5501-035
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 2
26
27 1
28
29 1
30 3
31 1
32
33 3
34 2
35 4
36 3
37 3
38 2
39 5
40 5
41 4
42 3
43 5
44 8
45 7
46 6
47 9
48 7
49 9
50 15
51 12
52 8
53 4
54 2
55 2
56 3
57
58 1
59 1
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 141 25 - 59 47 mph 51 mph 43 - 52 86 61%29% / 42 10% / 13
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
SPEED PARAMETERS
Hawthorne Blvd 2640' W/O Vallon Dr
Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-14:00
9/9/2019
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
Speed -MPHNumber of Vehicles
B-101
APPENDIX C
Survey Equipment
B-102
SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED
The radar equipment used by City Traffic Counters to collect speed measurements for
this survey was a Stalker-II SDR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar and a Stalker-ATR
Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar both manufactured by Applied Concepts of Plano,
Texas. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements
were taken. Tests of the units were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's
specifications. The Stalker-II SDR Hand-Held Traffic Radar and Stalker-ATR Model
Hand-Held Traffic Radar were last calibrated on January 15, 2019 by RHF Inc.
The radar equipment used by National Data & Surveying to collect speed
measurements for this survey was a Falcon Radar manufactured by Kustom Electronics
of Lenexa, Kansas. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of
measurements were taken. Tests of the units were conducted in accordance with the
manufacturer's specifications. The Falcon Hand-Held Traffic Radar were last calibrated
on October 31, 2018 by RHF Inc.
B-103
B-104
RHF TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
Inc. TESTED TO NRTSA SPECIFI CA TIONS I IA CP CRITICAL PERFORMAN CE STANDARDS
(NHTSA) National High way and Traffi c Safety Admini s trati o n.
Radar Repair (IA C P) Internatio nal Associati o n of Chiefs of Poli ce.
16202 Keats Circle R.R .F. is a ce rtified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Ca lif. 92683
1 TEST ID Da/ Recei ved -/~ -1' Certific ~~NJ ~9
Make Mode l Type (l -TV) Directional radar Same direction
2 DEVICE ID Aoolied CODI'Pnt~ Stalker -A TR III or IV :J o Yes $NO o Yes -, .2l1-lo
Cou n ji~:?~ _<;, ~ Antenna-1 SIN N/A Antenna -2 SIN N/A Ji ?(~
§ 2.4 I ~ 5.4 Low Zeed fo r':ir Last dat e calib. Freq. (Hz) Speed (mph) Mz'2d~HE / t).3 I 2 ~ .
3 TUNING FORK PASS FAI L H~;h ~ •·/ fork SIN Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) SpeeV7h) Measure<L, lj ~) CALIBRATION ~ '-1 Z2 "7 t/1 .I~
Lo fork High fork
Fork speed (mph ) 25 40
S£ationary mode
§ 2.5 I § 5 .5 Disp. Speed (mph) zr ¥6
4 RADAR DEVICE Expec £ed. Displayed. PASS FAIL TUNING FORK Movi ng mod e TARGET SPEED (mph ) 15 (mp h) N/1'1 TESTS Opposite Direction (Hi fork -Lo fork)
Moving mode TARGET SPEED Expected. Di s played.
Hj fork + Lo fork N /A N/A Same Direction (mph ) (mph ) Ho fork -Lo fork
Standard supply Antenna 1
?"71. 7Z 9
Antenna 2
§ 2.6.1. I § 5.6.1 V ' (V) 13.6 v Freq . GHz Freq . GHz N/A
-TRANSMISSIO N Slandard supply Antenna I An tenna 2 PASS FAfl J FREQUENCY V--1 20 % (V) 10.8 V Freq. GHz $ ~ 729 Freq . GHz NIA
ST ABfUTY Standard s upp ly Antenna I An tenna 2
vult wP + 20% (V) 16.3 v f req . GHz "J' c/. 72 CJ Freq. GHz N/A
§ 2.6.5 I§ 5.6.5 Mfg. Spec . Antem1a 1 Anten n a 2 PASS FAIL 6 ,j~ POWER DENSITY (maxrn W/cm ) S 4 Power (mW/cm) Powe r (mW/c m) N/A
7 § 2 .8 / § 5.8 Mfg. spec. LV A activates 6.-9 LV A deactivates R. PASS FAIL LOW VOLTAGE {V) S 10.8V (V) (V) 4jl
§ 2.9.1 I § 5.9 .1 A. Audio tone co rrel ates wi£h received Doppler signal . z-Yes ~ o No PASS FAIL 8 DOPPLER AUDIO B. Fu ncti on in g audio volun.~ ~djusnnent contr ol = t!fYes ~ oNo
§ 2 .12.4 I § 5 .12.4 Mfg. Spec. Test results
9 iNTERNAL 40 T es t OK 9'o -n'J7~ ~K PASS FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6 .5 I § A. Selects only targets movi ng towards radar C o Yes o No C .i!!""N .A.
10 5.12 .6.5 B. Selects onl y targets moving awa y from rada r o Yes f"1 o No fl ~ N.A. PASS FAIL
DiRECT IONAL
Stationary mode : Low speed s pec . 12 Lo speed di sp /2....
target channel (mph ) Hi speed spec . 200 Hi speed disp. Zt:JCI
§ 2.1 2.7 / § ?.1 2 .8 I
Lo w speed spec . 15 Lo speed disp . .;V/4 5.12.7 I 5.12.8 Moving Mode
LOW AND HIGH PASS FAIL I I target channel (mph )
SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. 200 (C) Hi speed disp . N/.4
TEST
Moving Mode: Low speed spec. 5 Lo speed disp . N/4
. patrol channe l (mph ) H i speed spec. 70 Hi speed disp . N/,1
§ 2.13 I § 5.13 .,
12 PASS FAIL RFI TEST •• k --•
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the Natio nal Traffic
Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 ..EJ PASS DFAIL
14 NHTSA/IACP
CERTfFICATlON
Ce rtifi ed by: /?---~, .... Date : /-/.J-I? / 7 •
_o Fork Cert -o Manual -0 2DG An£. ::o Rem ote =o Bat 15 INVENTORY L
-r: ying Case o Other: (please list) _o
B-105
R F TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
Inc. TESTED T O N HI SA S P ECIFI CATIONS I IACP CRITICAL P E R FORMANCE STANDARDS
(NHTSA) N ationa l Highwa y and T raffic S a fe ty A dministrati o n. Radar Repair (IAC P) Inte rnational Asso ci a tion of C hi efs of Police.
16202 Ke a ts C irc le RH.F . is a c ertified inde}}e nde ot testi ng and repair fac ili ty.
Westm in ster , Ca li f . 92683
1 TEST ID Date R e ceived
/-/J -lq Certification Number ? < 7 ? 0
Make ~"A" Stalke r-0 T.Yne {l-TV) Directional radar Same direction
A •;.,fi r. ... S DIV o r ~IDR {m l or rv Z'Yes oNo o Yes RfN o 2 DEVICE fD Co111 ~~ u'2J SIN Anten n a-1 SIN N/A Antenna-2 SIN N/A ,2 ~ ?07"7
§ 2.4 I § 5.4 Low speed fork S IN Last date calib . Freq. (Hz) Speed (mph) Measured (Hz)
I(PAS S 3 TU 'lNGFOR.K FAIL H.i!rl~eed fork SIN Last date cal1b. Freq . (Hz) srddmph) Ml V)~ (l::fz) CAL IBRATION ~ 31/ z... ~ 69
Lo fork High fork
Fork speed (mph) 25 40
Stationary mode
2~ § 2.5 f § 5.5 Disp . Speed (mph) ¥~
RADAR DEVICE • ~PAS 0 4 Expected. Displayed. FAlL TUNlNGFORK Movino mode TARGET SPEED :::> (mph ) 15 (mph) N/A TESTS Opposite Direction (Hl fork-Lo fork)
Mov in g mode TARGET SPEED Expected. Displayed.
H i fork + L.o fo r k (mph) 65 (mph) Same Direct ion IV/A Ho fork -Lo fo rk 15
Standard supply Antenna 1 Antenna2
§ 2.6. t. I § 5 .6. I Vol~ (V)-13.6 v JreQ. GHz ?v. 7¥ 7 Freq. GHz N/A
-TRANSMlSSlON Standard suppl y Antenna 1 Anlenna2 ,..
FAIL ) FREQUENCY v· -20% (V) 10.8 v Freq . GHz s¥. 7¥7 Freq. Gllz Ni t\ ~AS ~
STABILITY Stand ard s upply Antenna 1 ':? y: 7 y7 Antcnna2
voltage+ 20% (V) 163 v Freq. GHz r .... ~.~. GHz N/A
6 §, 2 .6 .5 I § 5 .6.5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna 1 R7 Antenna2 I":. FAfL POWER DENSITY (max mW /cm) <2 Po wcr (mWfcm) Power (m W /em) N /A ~AS ~ -
7 § 2.8 I § 5.8 Mfg. spec . LV A activates LV A deactivates 6.1 ,...PAS S) FAIL LOW VOLTAGE (V) $7 V (V) s. 3' (V) 6A ~} 8 § 2.9.1 I § 5.9. 1 A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal .f!f'Yes oNo FATL nC)pPL.ER AUDTO B. Functioning audio volume .<uliustment control Iif'Y es oNo
§ 2 .12.4 I § 5.12 .4 Mfg. Spec. Test results
C PAS V 9 INTERNAL P ASS ,P4ss FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2. 12.6.5 / § A Selects onl y targets movi ng towards radar ~Yes oNo oN.A.
LO 5.12.6.5 B. Selects only targets moving away from radar 2'Yes o No oN.A. \!AS§, FAIL
n iR£L JIVNAL
Stationary mode: Low speed spec. 12 Lo speed dis p /2-
target channel (mph) Hi speed spec. 20 0 Hi speed disp. ZOo
§ 2.12 .7 I § 2 .12.8 f
20 Jlf//4 5.12 .7 I 5.12.8 Lo w sp eed spec. Lo speed disp. Movi ng Mode ~As y 11 LOW AND HTGI I target chan nel (mph ) FAlL
SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. 200(C) Hi speed dis p. /li/A
TEST
Moving Mode: Low spe.ed spec. 15 L.o speed disp. A.//,4
patrol channe l (mph ) Hi speed spec. 79 Hi speed disp. A//.4 -
12 § 2 .13 I § 5.13 ~As§, FATL RFf TEST
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar devic e meets or e.'Cc e eds tlze minimal operatio11al sta11dards of the N ational Traffic
Highway Safety A dmiiZistration. Cal~fornia V ehicle Code Sectio n 40802 ErPASS D FAll ,
14 Nff(S.AJIACP
CERTIFICATION ....
Certified by: 7 / ~ Date: /-/..S -/9 7~
o Fork Cert , o Manual 0 lnd Ant. o Remote oBat. LS lNVENTORY o C<U • ying Case o Other: (ol ' list)
•
B-106
(((!!!!F TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
Inc. TEST ED T O NHTSA S P ECIFI CATIONS I IAC P C RIT ICAL P E RFORMANCE STANDARDS
(N HTSA) National Hig hway and Tra ffic Safety Administration.
(IACP ) International Asso ciation o f C hi efs of Police
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F . is a certified independent testing and repair facili ty ..
Westminster, Calif. 92683
I TEST ID Da~e7~e~ I -1 ~ cen,~n;u~b:?
Make : Model: Falcon and I Type (I-IV) Direct io nal radar I Same di rection
2 DEVICE ID K usto m Elec tronics Roa d Runne r Ill o Yes .d'No o Yes $No
c~~nit 1'!t -z 1 Antenna-I SIN N/A Antenna-2 SIN N/A
§ 2 .4 I§ 5.4 Low speed fork SIN Last date cali b. Freq . (Hz) Speed (m ph) Measured (Hz)
3 TUNING FORK High speed fork SIN Last date cali b. Freq . (Hz) S peed (mph) Meas ured (Hz) PASS FAIL
CALIBRATION
Lo fork Hil!h fo rk
Fo rk speed (mph) 35 65
Stationary mode
§ 2 .5 I§ 5.5 Disp. Speed (mph) ...?\ 6r'
4 RADAR DEVICE Expected . Disp layed. @ FA IL TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED
TESTS Opposite Di rection (Hi fo rk -Lo fo rk) (mph) N/A (mph) N/A
Moving mode TARGET SPEED Expected. Disp layed .
Same Direction Hi fork + Lo fork (m ph) N/A (mph) N/A
Ho fork -Lo fork
Standard supp ly Antenna l Antenna2
§ 2 .6. 1.1 § 5.6 .1 Voltage (V) 13.6 v Frea . GHz Zl/.I0-1 Frea . GHz NIA
5 TRANSMISSION Standard su pply Ante nn a I Antenna2 @ FAIL FREQUENCY Vo ltage -20%(V} 10.8 V Frea . GHz 2 </.10</ Fre a . GHz NIA
STABILITY Stan dard su pply Ante nn a I Antenna2
vo lt age + 20% -(V) 16.3 V Freq. GHz 2</.Jo<l FreQ . GHz NIA
6 § 2.6.5 I § 5.6.5 Mfg . Spec. Antenna I Ante nna 2 @ POWER DENSITY (max mW/cm) ~5 Power (mW/cm) ~ ).§' Power(mW/cm) N/A FAIL
7 § 2.8 I § 5.8 Mfg. spec. LV A activates
9·7
LV A deactivates
/tJ.t <!Ao/ FAIL LOW VOLTAGE cvf < 10.8 v (V) (V)
8 § 2.9. l I § 5.9 .1 A. Audio tone correlates with rece ived Doppler signal zYes o No ~ FAIL DOPPLER AUDIO B. Functioni ng a ud io vol ume-ad iustment control ~ Yes o No
§ 2 .12 .4 I § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. I Test resu lts @ 9 INTERNAL 32 5L FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2 .12.6.5 I§ A. Selects on ly targets movi ng towards radar o Yes o No dNA
10 5.12 .6.5 B. Selects on ly targets mov in g away from radar o Yes o No ~N.A. PASS FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
Stati on ary mode : Low speed spec. 20 Lo speed disp . zo
target channe l (m ph) Hi speed spec . 199 Hi speed disp . I '79
§2 .12 .7 I § 2 .12.8 /
5.12 .7 /5.12.8 Movi ng Mode Low speed spec. N/A Lo speed disp. N/A G II LOW AND HIGH target channel (m ph ) FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec . N/A Hi speed dis p. N/A
TEST N/A Moving Mode : Low speed spec. Lo speed disp . N/A
patrol channel (mph)
Hi speed spec. N/A Hi speed disp. N/A
12 §2 .13 /§5 .13 l<!Ajl FA IL RFI TEST
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic
Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 ..Ef'PASS 0 FAIL
14 NHTSNIACP
CERTIFICATION
C ertified by : --2. R~ Date: /CJ-:7 I -1 ~ 7 ---1
15 INVENTORY 0 Fork Cen ,
0 Manual 0 2nd Ant 0 Remote 0 Bat . I 0 Carrying Case 0 Other: (p lease list)
B-107
(((RHF TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
Inc. TESTED T O NHTSA SP EC IF ICATIONS IIACP C RITI CAL P E R FORMANCE STAN DARDS
(N HTSA) Na t ional Highway and T raffic Safety Admi ni stra t ion.
(IACP) Inte rnational Association of C hiefs of Police
16202 Keats C ircle R.H.F. is a c ertified i ndepende nt testing and r e pa ir facili ty •.
W estmin ster Calif. 92683
I TEST ID Dat1bce~~ / -I 8 Certifis;c:?~b~ b
Make: Model : Falcon a nd I Type (I -IV) Directional radar I Same direction
2 DEVICE ID K ustom Ele c tronics Road Runne r Ill o Yes .!!'"No o Yes lil"No
c~~~~nos-Antenna-! SIN N/A Antenna-2 SIN N/A
§ 2.4 I§ 5.4 Low s peed fork SIN Last date calib . Freq. (Hz) Speed (m ph) Meas ured (Hz)
3 TUN ING FORK High speed fork SIN Last date calib . Freq . (Hz) Speed (m ph) Measured (Hz) PASS FA IL
CALIBRATION
Lo fork High fork
Fork speed (mph) 3 5 65
Stationary mode
§2.5 1 §5 .5 Disp . Speed (mph) .sr b~
4 RADAR DEV ICE Expected . Displayed . @ FA IL TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED
TESTS Opposite Direction (Hi fork -Lo fork) (mp h) N/A (mph) N/A
Movi ng mode TA RGET SPEED Ex pected . Disp layed .
Same Directio n Hi fo rk + Lo fo rk (mph ) N/A (mph) N/A
Ho fork -Lo fork
Standard supply Antenna I Anten na 2
§ 2 .6.1. I § 5 .6 .1 Vol tage (V) l3.6 v Freq . GHz 2 Y. I 7 / Freq . GHz NIA
5 TRJ\NSM ISS ION Standard supply Antenna I
Zl/.17/
Anten na2 @ FAIL FREQUENCY Voltage -20%(V) 10.8 V Freq . GHz Freq. GHz NIA
STABILITY Standard s uppl y Antenna 1
2Y.;7 /
Ante nn a 2
voltage + 20% (V) 16.3 v Freq . Gl-lz Freq . GHz NIA
6 § 2.6 .5 I § 5.6 .5 Mfg. Spec. Ante nn a I ,£:? Antenna 2 te POW ER DENSITY (max mWicm) :S 5 Power (mWicm) Power (mWicm) NIA FAIL
7 § 2 .8 I § 5.8 Mfg. spec. LV A activates <CJ,3 LV A deactivates ;(},( I@ FA IL LOW VOLTAGE (V) < 10.8 v (V) (V)
8 § 2 .9 .1 I § 5.9 .1 A. Aud io tone corre lates with received Do ppl er s igna l A Yes o No ~ FAIL DOPPLER AUD IO B. Functioni ng a udio vo lume -adjustment con tro l .A!l Yes o No
§ 2 .12.4 1 § 5 .12 .4 Mfg. Spec. I Test resu lts G 9 INTERNAL 32 $2-FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2 .12.6 .51 § A. Selects onl y targets mov ing towards radar o Yes o No i!!"N.A.
10 5 .12 .6.5 B. Selects onl y targets movi ng away from radar o Yes o No .e!"N.A . PASS FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
Station ary mode : Low speed spec. 20 Lo speed d isp. zo
target channel (mph) Hi speed spec . 199 Hi speed d isp . I e;c;
§ 2.12.7 1 § 2 .12 .8 I N/A N/A 5.12 .7 1 5 .12 .8 Movi ng Mode Low speed spec. Lo speed disp . G I I LOW AND HIGH target chan nel (mph) FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY Hi s peed spec. N/A Hi speed disp . N/A
TEST N/A N/A Moving Mo de : Low speed spec. Lo speed d isp .
patrol channel (m ph )
Hi s peed spec. N/A Hi speed disp . N/A
12 §2.13 1 §5 .13 QA~ FA IL RFI TEST
13 LABORATO RY
COMMENTS
Tllis radar device meets or exceeds tire minimal operational standards of til e N ational Traffic
Highway Safety A dministration. Califomia Vellicle Code Section 40802 J;2r"PASS D FAIL
14 NHTSAIIACP
CERTIFICATION
C ertified by: -:/' _.._,.j 7?~ Date : /t:?-s/-;<Y
15 INVENTORY 0 Fork Cert ' 0 Man ual 0 2nd Ant. 0 Remote 0 Bat. I 0 Carrying Case 0 O th er: (please list)
B-108
((( J!!JF Inc.
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
TESTED T O NHTSA S P EC IFICATIONS /IACP C RITICAL P E R FORMANCE STANDA RDS
(N HTSA) Na tional Hi g hwa y and T raffic Sa fe ty Administra tion.
(IACP ) Internati onal Associa tion of C hiefs of Police
J 6202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a cert ified independe nt testing and r e pair facili ty ..
Westminster, Calif. 92683
I TEST ID Dat1~e~j I _, e Certifi~~ ~~J-
Make : Model : Fa lcon and I Type (I-IV) Directional radar 1 Same direction
2 DEVICE ID Kusto m Elec t roni cs Roa d Runne r Ill o Yes ol'f'No o Yes ~No
c~_enitj~,) &] 0 Antenna-I SIN N/A Antenn a-2 SIN N/A
§ 2 .4 / § 5.4 Low speed fork SIN Last date cali b. Freq . (Hz) Speed (mph) Meas ured (Hz)
3 TUN£NG FORK High speed fo rk SIN Last date calib . Freq. (l-Iz) Speed (mph) Measured (l-Iz) PASS FAIL
CALIBRAT ION
Lo fork HTgjl fo rk
Fo rk speed (mph) 35 6 5
Stationary mode gs-6] § 2.5 I § 5.5 Dis p. S peed (mph)
4 RADAR DEV ICE Expected . Displayed . 9 FAIL TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED
TESTS Opposite Direction (H i fork-Lo fork) (mph) N/A (mph) N/A
Moving mode TARGET SPEED Expected . Displayed.
Hi fo rk+ Lo fo rk N/A N/A Same Direction Ho fork -Lo fo rk
(mph) (m ph)
Stand ard supp ly Anten na I Zl/.!&'6 Ante nna 2
§ 2 .6 .1./ § 5.6 .1 Volta~e (V) 13.6 v Fre a . GHz Frea . GHz N/A
5 TRANSMISSION Standard su pply Ante nn a I z~./J~ Antenna2 8 FAI L FREQUENCY Vo ltage -20%-(V) 10.8 v Freq . GHz Frea. GHz N/A
STABILITY Standard su pp ly An te nna I 2 ~.;!b Anten na 2
volta~e + 20% (V) 16.3 v Frea . GHz Frea . GHz N/A
6 § 2 .6 .5 I§ 5.6.5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna I y/ Antenn a2 [@ POWER DENS ITY (max mWicm) ::; 5 Power (mW/cm) Power (mW/cm) N/A FAIL •
7 § 2.8/ § 5.8 Mfg. spec. LV A act ivates 9.8 LVA deactivates ;(},q ~~AS~ FAIL LOW VOLTAGE (Vl-< 10.8 v (V) (V)
8 § 2 .9 .1 I § 5.9.1 A. Audio to ne co rre lates with received Dop pler signa l ~es o No l<EA~ FAIL DOPPLER AUDIO B . Function in~ a udio vol um e-adiustment control .¥Yes o No
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. I Test res ul ts 3'2-e 9 INTERNAL 32 FA IL
CIRCUIT
§ 2 .12 .6.5/ § A. Se lects onl y targets movi ng towards radar o Yes o No -d'"N .A.
10 5 .12.6 .5 B. Se lects on ly targets movin g away from radar o Yes o No l1'N.A. PASS FAJL
DIRECT IONAL
Statio nary mo de: Low speed s pec. 20 Lo speed disp . ?_0
target channe l (m ph) Hi speed spec . 199 Hi speed disp. 119
§ 2 .12.7/ § 2 .12 .8/ N/A N/A 5.12.715.12.8 Movi ng Mode Low speed spec. Lo speed disp . ~ II LOW AND HIGH target chan nel (mph) FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. N/A Hi speed d isp. N/A
TEST
Movi ng Mode: Low speed spec. N/A Lo s peed disp . N/A
patrol channel (mph)
Hi s peed spec. N/A Hi speed d isp . N/A
12 § 2 .131 § 5.13 I<!A~ FA IL RFI TEST
13 LABO RATORY
COMMENTS
Til is radar device meets or exceeds tile minimal operational standards of tile National Traffic
Highway Safety A dministration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 ZPASS 0 FAIL
14 NHTSAIIACP
CERTIFICATION
C ertified by : --:;;:._, /Z Date : /d -3' 1-l f ~-
15 INVENTORY D Fork Cert ,
D Maf!U al o 2nd Ant. D Re mote D Bat. I D Carrvi n ~ Case D Oth er: (please list)
B-109
(((!!HF TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
Inc. TESTED T O NHTSA SP EC I F ICATIONS /IACP C RJ T ICAL P E R FORMANCE STANDA RDS
(NH TSA) Nati onal Hig hway and T raffic Sa fety Administra tion.
(IACP ) Inte rnational Associa tion o f C h iefs of Police
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified inde pendent testin g and repair fa cility ..
Wes t minster, Calif. 92683
I TEST ID Date Jai:Cj 1 _1 K Cert i fi~o~~e!z_
Make : Mode l: Fa lco n a nd I Type {I -I V) Di rectional radar I Same d irection
2 DEVICE lD Ku sto m E lectronics Road Runne r Ill o Yes fNo o Yes ,!No
c~?n~~~ 6.f Ante nna-I SIN N/A Antenna-2 SIN N/A
§ 2.4 1 § 5.4 Low speed fo rk SIN Last date calib. Freq . (Hz) Speed (mph) Measu red (Hz)
3 TUNING FORK High speed fo rk SIN Last date calib. Freq . (Hz) S peed (mph) Measured (Hz) PASS FAIL
CALIBRATION
Lo fork Hjgjl fo rk
Fo rk s peed (mph ) 35 65
Stationary mode
6r" § 2.5 I § 5.5 Disp. Speed (mph) ..51
4 RADAR DEVICE Expected . Dis pl ayed. G~s~ FA IL TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED
TESTS Op posite Direction (Hi fork -Lo fork) (mph) N/A (mph) N/A
Moving mode TARGET S PEED Expected . Dis pl ayed .
Hi fork+ .Lo fo rk N/A N/A Same Direction Ho fork -Lo fork
(m ph ) (mph )
Stan dard supp ly An ten na I
2¥./J3
Antenna 2
§ 2 .6 .1./ § 5.6 .1 Voltage (V) 13.6 v Frea . GHz Frea . GHz N/A
5 TRANSM ISSION Standard supply Antenn a I Ante nn a2 9 FA IL FREQUENCY Vo ltage -20% (V) 10.8 v Frea . GHz 2'1./J'.:l Fre a . GHz N/A
STAB ILITY Stand ard supply An te nna I Antenn a 2
voltage + 20% (V) 16.3 v Frea . GHz 2£/. /)3 Fre a . GHz N/A
6 § 2 .6 .5 I § 5.6 .5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna I • ~-1 Antenna 2 @ POWER DENS ITY (max mW/cm) :::;5 Power (mW/cm) Power (mW/cm) N/A FA IL
7 § 2 .8 / § 5.8 Mfg. s pec. LV A act ivates 9 -1 LV A deactivates ;tf. I -~A~ FAIL LOW VOLTAGE (V) < 10.8 v (V) (V)
8 § 2 .9 .1 / § 5.9 .1 A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler s ignal z Yes o No @ FAIL DOPPLER AUDIO B. Func tio ning aud io volu me-adiustment control i?f Yes o No
§2.I2.4 / § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. I Test res ul ts ~ 9 INTERNAL 32 3'-FA IL
C IRCUIT
§ 2.12 .6 .5 / § A Selects on ly targets movi ng towards radar o Yes o No -l!f'N .A.
10 5 .12.6 .5 B. Se lects onl y targets movi ng away fro m rada r o Yes o No dNA PASS FA IL
DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode : Low speed spec. 20 Lo s peed di sp. 20
target ch an ne l (m ph) Hi speed spec . 199 Hi speed dis p. Ji:JCJ
§ 2 .12.7 / § 2 .12 .8 I
5.12 .7 /5.12 .8 Movi ng Mode Low speed spec . N/A Lo speed dis p. N/A ~ II LOW AND HIGH target channel (mph) FA IL
SPEED DISPLAY Hi speed spec. N/A Hi speed d is p. N/A
TEST N/A Moving Mode : Low speed spec. Lo s peed disp . N/A
patrol chan nel (mph)
Hi speed spec . N/A Hi speed d isp. N/A
12 §2 .13 /§5 .1 3 I <!A~ FA IL RF I T EST
13 LABO RATORY
COMMENTS
Th is radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic
Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 J2(P ASS 0 FAlL
14 NHTSNIACP
CERTIFICATION -:7-.--/ Certified by: 7?~ Date : /O -s 1 --1 r
15 INVENTO RY 0 Fork Cert I 0 Man ual 0 2nd Ant. 0 Remote 0 Bat. I 0 Carryi ng Case 0 Oth er: (pl ease li st)
B-110
((( !!!!F Inc.
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
TESTED T O NHTSA S P ECI F ICATIONS I IACP C RIT ICA L P ERFORMANCE ST AN DA RDS
(N HTSA) Na tional Hi g hway and T .-affic Safe ty Admin istration.
(IACP ) Inte rnationa l Association of C hi efs of Po lice
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certifie d inde pendent testing and r e pair fa cili ty ..
Westminster, Calif. 92683
I TEST ID Date'el5v~'3 J -/ Jl Certiticati?~,?m~q 1/
Make : Mode l: Falcon a nd I Type (I-IV) Directional rada r T Same di rection
2 DEVICE ID Kust o m Ele ctronics Ro a d Runner Ill o Yes Ji!"No o Yes D' No
Co~)lli~)~ 1./l/ I Antenna-I SIN N/A Antenna-2 SIN N/A
§2.4 1 §5.4 Low speed fo rk SIN Last date cal ib . Freq . (Hz) Speed (mph) Meas ured (Hz)
3 TUNING FORK High speed fork SIN Last date calib. Freq . (Hz) Speed (m ph) Measured (Hz) PASS FA IL
CALIBRATION
Lo fo rk Hil!h fork
Fo rk speed (mph ) 35 65
Stationary mode
§ 2.5 I § 5.5 Dis p. Speed (mph ) .!?~ 6r
4 RADAR DEVICE Expected . Displayed . @ FA IL TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED
TESTS O pposite Direction (I-Ii fo rk -Lo fork) (m ph ) N/A (m ph) N/A
Moving mode TARGET SPEED Expected . Disp layed .
Same Di rection Hi fo rk + Lo fork (m ph ) N/A (mph) NIA
1-lo fo rk -Lo fo rk
Stan dard su pply Ante nn a I 2 y, !.3'6' Ante nna2
§ 2 .6 .1.1 § 5.6 .1 Vo ltage (V). 13.6 v FreQ . GHz FreQ . GHz NIA
5 TRANSMISS ION Standard supply Ante nn a I z ~ /..?t Antenna 2 9 FAIL FREQU ENCY Vo ltage -20% (V) 10.8 v Frea . GHz FreQ . GHz N/A
STAB ILITY Standard suppl y Anten na I z t:/.1..?~ Antenn a 2
vo ltage + 20% -(V) 16.3 v Fre Q. GHz Fre Q. GI-lz NIA
6 § 2 .6.5 I § 5.6.5 Mfg. Spec. Antenna I . c I An tenna2 ~ POW ER DENS ITY (max mW/cm) ~ 5 Power (mWicm) Power (mWicm) N/A FAIL
7 § 2 .8 I § 5.8 Mfg . spec. LV A activates Cj,7 (~A deactivates /tJ ,g ~ FA IL LOW VOLTAGE (V) < 10.8 v (V)
8 § 2.9 .1 I § 5.9 .1 A. Audio to ne correlates with received Do p pler signal .4Yes o No @ FAIL DOPPLE R AUD IO B. Functioning audio volum e-ad justme nt control .f! Yes o No
§ 2 .12 .4 1 § 5.12 .4 Mfg. Spec. I Test res ults <§ 9 INT ERNAL 32 32-FA IL
CIRCUIT
§ 2 .12.6 .5 1 § A. Selects on ly targets mov ing towards radar o Yes o No .e'N.A.
10 5.12.6.5 B. Se lects only targets movi ng away from radar o Yes o No Jit"N.A. PASS FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode : Low speed spec. 20 Lo speed disp. 20
target chan nel (mph) 1-1 i speed spec . 199 Hi s peed di sp. 111 § 2 .12 .7 1 § 2 .12 .8 1
5.12.7 1 5.12 .8 Moving Mo de Low speed s pec. N/A Lo speed di sp. N/A @ II LOW AND HIGH target chan ne l (mph) FA IL
SPEE D DISPLAY Hi speed spec. N/A Hi speed di s p. N/A
TEST
Mov in g Mode : Low s peed spec. N/A Lo s peed d is p. N/A
patro l channe l (mp h)
1-1 i speed spec. N/A Hi s peed di sp. N/A
12 §2.13 1 §5 .13 ~~ FAIL RF I TEST
13 LABORATO RY
COMM ENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the mi11imal operational standards of th e N ational Traffic
Highway Safety A dmi11istration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 ~ASS 0 FAfL
14 NHTSA/IACP
CERTIFICAT ION -:7-__ , Ce rtified by : 7?~ Date: ;o-.s I -I e:
IS INV ENTORY 0 Fork Cert r 0 Manua l 0 2nd Ant. 0 Remote 0 Bal. I 0 Carrving Case 0 Other: (clease list)
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
B-111