Loading...
CC SR 20210119 02 - Preserve Parking and Access CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 01/19/2021 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business AGENDA TITLE: Consideration and possible action regarding the City Council-adopted directives to address parking and access issues for the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTIONS: (1) Approve an agreement with ParkMobile to provide app-based parking services at Del Cerro Park and sections of Crenshaw Boulevard south of Crest Road; (2) Approve an additional appropriation of $26,912 for the installation of the ParkMobile parking app; (3) Provide direction on potential Preserve parking fees and citation fines; (4) Accept the proposed Alta Vicente Reserve trailhead improvements at Upper Point Vicente Park/Civic Center; and (5) Receive and file an update on costs related to the management of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs associated with establishing an app-based parking system is not currently budgeted. An additional appropriation of $26,912 is needed for installation of ParkMobile parking app equipment and annual fees. Amount Budgeted: $0 Additional Appropriation: $26,912 Account Number(s): 101-400-5122-5101 (General Fund – OSM/Professional Services) ORIGINATED BY: Matt Waters, Senior Administrative Analyst REVIEWED BY: Cory Linders, Director of Recreation and Parks APPROVED BY: Ara Mihranian, AICP, City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: A. December 15, 2020 staff report B. Agreement with ParkMobile (page B-1) C. Parking fees analysis (page C-1) D. Analysis of Palos Verdes Nature Preserve expenses (page D-1) E. FY 2016-17 NCCP/HCP Costs Analysis (page E-1) F. Public correspondence (page F-1) 1 BACKGROUND: In the past decade, the internet and social media have popularized hiking trails in Rancho Palos Verdes, leading to a significant uptick in visitors to the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The Portuguese Bend Reserve is the City’s most popular nature reserve and is often considered the front door to the 1,400-acre Preserve. Approximately 658 people visit the reserve daily, resulting in vehicular traffic and noise impacts on surrounding neighborhoods, especially on weekends and holidays. The area that is the most impacted is the stretch of Crenshaw Bou levard south of Crest Road. For approximately eight years, the City has worked with surrounding residents to implement solutions, but despite these efforts, adverse impacts persist. In response, the City Council has discussed and provided directives addressing these impacts at previous meetings on August 18, 2020, September 1, 2020, October 20, 2020, and as recent as December 15, 2020. On December 15, 2020, the City Council provided direction on a number of proposals and mitigation measures related to parking and traffic concerns in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, particularly in the Del Cerro area (Attachment A). Below is a summary of City Council action items from December 15: • Directed Staff to conduct a study of additional parking alternatives, but removing from such study Tarragon Rd, Del Cerro and Gateway Park (deferring Gateway Park to a future date once the Park area landslide is stabilized), and included in the parking analysis Crenshaw Blvd, (such study to be coordinated with the Traffic Safety Committee). • Approved a 90-day pilot shuttle program. • Received and filed a traffic and parking analysis update for the Preserve • Directed staff to return with plans and costs for enhancements at Upper Pt. Vicente/Civic Center near Alta Vicente Reserve. • Received and filed a status update on the Preserve capacity levels analysis. • Received and filed a status report on Web and Social Media Campaign including Search Engine Optimization (SEO). • Received and filed a status update on the installation of the entry gates at the Burma Road and Rattlesnake Trailheads. • Approved hours of operation for the Burma Road and Rattlesnake Trailhead gates and street parking along Crenshaw Blvd., the same to be established and posted on a quarterly basis (7am to one hour after sunset). • Received and filed the staff status update on the selection of a parking app service provider to establish a parking app system for the Del Cerro area, with direction that a vendor contract be limited to one (1) year with the City option to extend the same up to four (4) one (1) year extensions and to bring the same along with a preliminary parking fee and fine analysis for consideration at the January 19, 2021, City Council meeting. • Received and file the staff status update on recruitment and hiring of parking enforcement personnel. 2 • Adopted Resolution No. 2020-73 extending the temporary parking prohibition along Crenshaw Boulevard south of Crest Road for an additional 90 days until March 19, 2021. This evening, the City Council will be considering the following action items from the above list: 1. Entering an Agreement and approving a budget appropriation with ParkMobile to establish an app-based parking reservation system for Del Cerro Park and the Portuguese Bend Reserve 2. Establishing potential parking fees and parking citation fines 3. Accepting the draft Alta Vicente Reserve trailhead improvements at Upper Point Vicente Park/Civic Center 4. Reviewing updated costs associated with the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve DISCUSSION: 1. Agreement and Budget Appropriation with ParkMobile to Provide App-based Parking Reservation Services Following direction from the City Council on October 20, 2020, Staff released an invitation for proposals for a parking reservation/permit online system for parking along Crenshaw Boulevard south of Crest Road (67 spaces) as well as the parking lot at Del Cerro Park (17 spaces). The invitation for proposals was sent to 11 firms on November 5, 2020. Five companies responded by the November 24 submission deadline. Following Staff review, three companies participated in follow-up meetings on Zoom on December 3 with a panel of City Staff from the Recreation and Parks and Public Works departments. While all three companies’ submissions were impressive, ParkMobile’s presentation and submission was the standout both in terms of quality and cost. As a result, at the December 15 meeting, the City Council authorized Staff and the City Attorney to negotiate an agreement with ParkMobile for consideration at the January 19, 2021 meeting. Said contract is attached for City Council review (Attachment B). The initial cost of installation is expected to be approximately $17,600. This is based on installing sensors at all 84 spaces, including 10 spaces along Crenshaw Boulevard currently red-curbed as part of the temporary moratorium put in place on September 1, 2020. In addition to the costs of installation, there would be annual maintenance fees totaling $9,312 a year. The total cost for the first year of operation is $26,912 and $9,312 annually for subsequent years (less the installation cost). This figure includes a $500 monthly fee for its reservation system. If the City Council wishes to keep the 10 spaces red-curbed, this would reduce the installation cost by $1,250. Staff recommends using a 100% reservation system, requiring users to make their reservation a minimum of two hours in advance. This approach would allow park/Preserve visitors to drive directly to a space in a designated zone without having to 3 circle in the area, thereby reducing traffic impacts in the area. Drop-in parking without a reservation would not be allowed and may result in a citation. Every reservation using the app will include a $.35 transaction fee. Additionally, a $.15 and 3% credit card transaction fee would be included in each paid reservation. ParkMobile would pay those fees directly to the credit card companies and submit payment to the City on a monthly basis, minus its transaction fees. These fees will be paid by the City from revenue generated by parking fees collected, as discussed in the next section. The term of this agreement is for one (1) year, with the option for the City to extend the agreement term by four (4) additional one-year term(s). If the agreement is approved this evening, installation is anticipated to be completed by the end of March 2021. To provide public awareness of the system, it is recommended that the implementation of the app be rolled out gradually. This would also allow staff to acquaint itself with the program, and to gather data on average length of stays, total occupancy, comparative use of zones and other factors. This would also allow Staff and ParkMobile to refine the operating system as needed. Signs, listserv messages and social media posts would be used to inform the public. Warnings and educational fliers about the parking app would be issued initially in lieu of citations. Based on the above, staff recommends that the City Council approved the agreement with ParkMobile and appropriate $26,912 for the installation of the parking app 2. Potential Parking Fees and Citation Fines At the December 15, 2020 meeting, the City Council directed staff to conduct additional research and analysis on what other areas charge for parking and bring back proposed parking fees and citation fines for consideration at the January 19 meeting. Parking Fees The suggested parking fees are based on a demand-based pricing parking model. In this case, the closer you park to the Burma Road Trailhead gate, the more you pay. Based on this pricing model, staff generated the following map to delineate suggested parking zones as part of this analysis (it should be noted that the gaps between zones represent physical delineations, such as fire hydrant red curbs or driveway aprons): 4 Zone A is considered the most desired, higher-demand parking area, and Zone F is the least desired. In order to minimize the flow of traffic around the area, it is recommended that the parking fee be established for 3-hour blocks of time for each of the zones. The suggested parking fee ranges listed below fall within the upper range of a recent Staff analysis of parking fees from 13 agencies. Staff contacted the U.S. Forest Service, California State Parks (multiple open space areas), the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority (MRCA) Malibu open space areas, the City of Los Angeles (Griffith Park and Eaton Canyon), the City of Monrovia (Monrovia Canyon Park and Hillside Wilderness Preserve), the City of Claremont (Claremont Hills Wilderness Park), Orange County Parks, and the City of Long Beach (El Dorado Regional Park) and compiled the attached research (Attachment C). Most agencies offer public parking lots to open space trails. Parking lot charges range from free to $15 per day. Several locations offer free street parking within a 1/4 -1/2-mile hike to a trailhead. Some of the agencies increase parking fees during peak use, offer annual passes, and offer discounts to seniors. Griffith Park offers free parking within parking lots during specific hours of the day, charges $15 per hour along Western Canyon Road adjacent to and at the parking lot at the Griffith Observatory, and offers a low-cost shuttle service during peak times when parking can reach capacity. The following chart shows the number of spaces and a range of suggested fees for each of the six zones, which are illustrated in the map above. Parking Zones Spaces Suggested Fee Range (For reserved 3- hour block of time) Zone A (Del Cerro Park) 17 $15-$25 Zone B 10 $10-$25 Zone C 13 $10-$20 Zone D 9 $10-$20 Zone E 9 $10-$15 Zone F 26 $5-$10 5 Below are proposed blocks of time for paid and free parking that would apply consistently to all six zones: Monday – Friday Hours Fees Free Block 7 a.m. - 8:59 a.m. No Block 1 9 a.m. - 11:59 a.m. Yes Block 2 12 p.m. - 2:59 p.m. Yes Block 3 3 p.m. - Preserve close *Yes Weekends/Holidays Hours Fees Block 1 7 a.m. - 9:59 a.m. Yes Block 2 10 a.m. - 12:59 a.m. Yes Block 3 1 p.m. - 3:59 p.m. Yes Block 4 4 p.m. - Preserve close *Yes *Fee will be prorated based on preserve closure time(one hour after sunset) The City Council has emphasized the importance of allowing for free parking near the Del Cerro Park area and in the general area. All the zones listed above are recommended to be free Monday through Friday between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. Free parking is also available on Crenshaw Boulevard north of Crest Road. It should be noted that a reservation would still be required during the free block of time and that ParkMobile charges a $.35 cent transaction fee for the reservation. These transaction fees for free parking reservations are budgeted to be paid by the City based on the parking fee revenue. There are no credit card processing fees on free parking reservations. Parking Citations Currently, citation fines are issued to vehicles parked in the City that violate posted signs. Below, is a summary of the current citation categories and amounts applicable to the area adjacent to the Portuguese Bend Reserve: • Park by Permit (applies to Residential Recreational Permit at Del Cerro Park and Residential Permit by Neighborhoods) - $50.00 pursuant to RPVMC §10.20.130 • Failure to Obey (applies to any posted street / traffic sign in Los Angeles County) - $65.00 LACOMC §15.20.070: • Passenger Loading Zone (applies to Crenshaw Blvd for temporary loading / unloading). Any unattended vehicle is considered parked - $50.00 pursuant to §15.64.140 CVC In order to dissuade parking violations, it is recommended that the parking citation fine for Failure to Obey and Passenger Loading Zone violations be increased to $110. 6 Staff seeks the City Council’s direction on the suggested parking fee, block time, and citation fine amounts. Based on Council direction, a resolution with parking fee and adjusted citation fine amounts will be brought back to the City Council. 3. Draft Alta Vicente Reserve Trailhead Improvements at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center As the City continues to promote the trails and parking at the Alta Vicente Reserve, the City Council directed Staff to identify areas that can be improved at the site and to return with additional details and locations for these proposed improvements. As reported at the December 15 meeting, Staff proposes developing a small kiosk area located near the upper parking lot and path from Hawthorne Boulevard. The area will serve as an information hub for trail access within Alta Vicente Reserve, as well as information on the entire Preserve with interpretive and trail material. Improvements will be made in the area to ensure trailhead and trail visibility, safety and access. The large grass area will be revived, and surrounding landscaping enhanced. The four trailheads serving the North Spur Trail, Nike Trail, South Spur Trail, and Prickly Pear Trail at the Civic Center site (marked by the green hiking icons) and the proposed shuttle bus location marked by the purple bus icon are proposed to be improved with decomposed granite or similar ground covering, benches, modest informational kiosks, and trash cans. These improvements would be done in-house within existing landscape maintenance budget funds. The map below shows the four trailheads at the Civic Center. 7 Below are artist renditions of proposed improvements at the four trailheads: 8 The preliminary cost estimate for this project is $35,000 and encompasses the following: • $11,000 for kiosks and benches. • $24,000 for preparation and installation of decomposed granite (dg) paths. 9 Staff seeks the City Council’s acceptance of the proposed site and trailhead improvements at the Civic Center. 4. Updated Costs Related to the Management of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve At the December 15 meeting, the City Council requested Staff provide a current accounting of City costs related to the management and upkeep of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve (Attachment D). The baseline for determining the current fees was a comprehensive study conducted for FY 2016-17 (Attachment E) as part of the City’s Natural Communities Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP). The current budget total for the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve for FY 2020-21 is $1,646,700. The budget includes costs associated with Park Rangers, Open Space Management Staff, Public Works maintenance efforts, bird surveys, signage, restoration activities, brush management, certain Preserve related Landslide Abatement District expenses, and road maintenance within the Preserve. Additionally, Attachment D includes $814,853 in approved capital projects: $54,197 for the Burma Road Trailhead; $120,990 for the Rattlesnake Trailhead; and $639,661 for the Coastal Bluff fencing projects. Costs under consideration at this time have not been accounted for in Attachment D. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Public Notification Extensive public outreach regarding this item has been conducted. Staff has placed notices at major trailheads, letters were mailed to residences within a 500 -foot radius of Del Cerro and Upper Point Vicente Park/Civic Center and Preserve and Breaking News listserv messages and social media posts were sent to disseminate information. Public Comments To date, the City has received 12 public comments prior to this report being published, and they are attached to this report (Attachment F). In general the comments range from maintaining resident parking at Del Cerro, not charging for parking, charging for parking, and maintaining the red curbs to name a few. Upcoming City Meeting with the California Coastal Conservancy and the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District In response to letters sent to the City from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District and the California Coastal Conservancy expressing concerns that the City is not complying with their respective grant stipulations, City Staff has a meeting scheduled for January 14 to provide clarification on the proposed parking migration 10 measures. Staff will provide an update on the progress of this meeting at the January 19 City Council meeting. CONCLUSION: Based on the information contained in this report, Staff recommends the City Council approve an agreement with ParkMobile to provide app-based parking services at Del Cerro Park and sections of Crenshaw Boulevard south of Crest Road; provide direction on Preserve parking fees and citation fines; accept the proposed Alta Vicente Reserve trailhead improvements at Upper Point Vicente Park/Civic Center; and receive and file an update on costs related to the management of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. ALTERNATIVES: In addition to the Staff recommendation, the following alternative action s are available for the City Council’s consideration: 1. Do not approve the Agreement with ParkMobile. 2. Direct Staff to conduct further parking fee and/or citation analysis for consideration at a future meeting. 3. Direct Staff not to proceed with site improvements at the Civic Center. 4. Take other action, as deemed appropriate. 11 01203.0006/690887.3 1 CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT By and Between CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES and PARKMOBILE, LLC B-1 01203.0006/690887.3 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND PARKMOBILE, LLC THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into on , 2021, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and PARKMOBILE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to, individually or collectively, as “Party” or “Parties.” RECITALS A. City has sought, by issuance of an Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement. B. Consultant is engaged in the business of providing integrated solutions for parking management, including a system for the electronic payment of on-demand, reservation and permit parking, related administration, and a system for the marketing and sale of such parking through the Internet and proprietary websites and mobile applications. C. Consultant, following submission of a bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. D. Pursuant to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. E. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated B-2 01203.0006/690887.3 2 herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. 1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 1.4 California Labor Law. If the Scope of Services includes any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws, including the following requirements: (a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that some or all of the work to be performed under this Agreement is a “public work” as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation. (b) Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determina tion of the prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post a copy of the same at each job site where work is performed under this Agreement. B-3 01203.0006/690887.3 3 (c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor. (d) Payroll Records. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subconsultant to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records. (e) Apprentices. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subconsultants shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement. (f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Consultant acknowledges that eight (8) hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. (g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight (8) hours per day, and forty (40) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than one and one-half (1½) times the basic rate of pay. (h) Workers’ Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Cod e Section 1861, Consultant certifies as follows: “I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to B-4 01203.0006/690887.3 4 undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.” Consultant’s Authorized Initials ________ (i) Consultant’s Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor who will perform work under this Agreement, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract with any subcontractor for work under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance, including without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor on a periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any such failure by any subcontractor. 1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. 1.6 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer. 1.7 Care of Work. The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be B-5 01203.0006/690887.3 5 responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence. 1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties. Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other. 1.9 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed. 1.10 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern. ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. 2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed $26,912 (Twenty Six Thousand Nine Hundred Twelve B-6 01203.0006/690887.3 6 Dollars) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.9. 2.2 Method of Compensation. The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.3 Reimbursable Expenses. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.4, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. 2.4 Invoices. Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall contain all information specified in Exhibit “C”, and shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub- contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. 2.5 Waiver. B-7 01203.0006/690887.3 7 Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performanc e of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one (1) year from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). The City may, in its sole discretion, extend the Term by four (4) additional one-year term(s). ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant. B-8 01203.0006/690887.3 8 The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: Garett Snook Director of Implementations (Name) (Title) Kristen Locke Senior Regional Sales Manager (Name) (Title) It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. 4.2 Status of Consultant. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. 4.3 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be Cory Linder, Director of Recreation and Parks, Daniel Trautner, Deputy Director of Recreation and Parks, or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. B-9 01203.0006/690887.3 9 The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.4 Independent Consultant. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. 4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 Insurance Coverages. Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. (a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted. B-10 01203.0006/690887.3 10 (b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non- owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. (c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connecti on with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement. (d) Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000). (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”. 5.2 General Insurance Requirements. (a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. (b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants. (c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non- B-11 01203.0006/690887.3 11 contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. (d) City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager. (f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. (h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarificati on only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. (i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. (j) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers B-12 01203.0006/690887.3 12 shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies. (k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. (l) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions. (m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for revi ew. (n) Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation. (o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by City. (p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. (q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work. 5.3 Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims B-13 01203.0006/690887.3 13 or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: (a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith; (b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees. Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be B-14 01203.0006/690887.3 14 maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act. 6.2 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. 6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information. B-15 01203.0006/690887.3 15 (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 7.2 Disputes; Default. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the B-16 01203.0006/690887.3 16 default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. 7.3 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein. 7.4 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel B-17 01203.0006/690887.3 17 specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement. 7.7 Liquidated Damages. Since the determination of actual damages for any delay in performance of this Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to determine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, the Consultant and its sureties shall be liable for and shall pay to the City the sum of $0 (Zero Dollars) as liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any service required hereunder. The City may withhold from any monies payable on account of services performed by the Consultant any accrued liquidated damages. 7.8 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2. 7.9 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. B-18 01203.0006/690887.3 18 7.10 Attorneys’ Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, B-19 01203.0006/690887.3 19 religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class. 8.4 Unauthorized Aliens. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City. ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notices. Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. 9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by B-20 01203.0006/690887.3 20 the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 9.5 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion. No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect. Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______ 9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] B-21 01203.0006/690887.3 21 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. CITY: CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a municipal corporation Eric Alegria, Mayor ATTEST: Emily Colborn, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP William W. Wynder, City Attorney CONSULTANT: PARKMOBILE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Name: Jon Ziglar Title: Chief Executive Officer By: Name: Hank Vanjaria Title: Chief Financial Officer Address: 1100 Spring St. NW, Suite 200 Atlanta, GA 30309 Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CON SULTANT’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY. B-22 01203.0006/690887.3 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On __________, 2021 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within in strument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. B-23 01203.0006/690887.3 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On __________, 2021 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. B-24 01203.0006/690887.3 A-1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will perform the following parking management services (“Services”) for parking spaces identified along Crenshaw Boulevard and Del Cerro Park (“Project”): A. Mobile Payment & Reservation Platform Consultant shall deploy its mobile payment and reservation platform (“Platform”) to enable residents and non-residents (rate dependent on eligibility) to obtain a parking permission by initiating a parking transaction. Parking transactions can be initiated through Consultant’s mobile application, website experience or via phone. Consultant shall make parking space inventory available for sale through the Platform and shall market and advertise such availability. City shall specify the number of parking spaces, corresponding reservation periods, and parking rates and may be altered by City at any time. Consultant shall provide the City with preventative maintenance, corrective maintenance, adaptive maintenance, and online, on-site, and telephone support with respect to the Services. Consultant shall use reasonable efforts to perform maintenance outside of the City’s business hours. If maintenance during the City’s business hours is required, Consultant shall provide the City with at least twenty-four (24) hours advance notice of such maintenance. Consultant’s transaction fee for each parking transaction shall be $0.35 (Thirty- Five Cents) per transaction. Consultant shall transfer any additional parking fees collected to the City. B. Vehicle Detection Sensors Consultant shall install and validate proper functionality of CivicSmart vehicle detection sensors in each identified parking space along Crenshaw Boulevard and Del Cerro Park to detect vehicle occupancy, inform policy decisions, and feed occupancy information in the ParkMobile application and Guidance Map on the City’s website to show motorists where they can find available parking spaces. Consultant shall also provide CivicSmart Directed Enforcement to alert and guide parking enforcement personnel to vehicles in violation. Consultant shall perform any necessary maintenance and repairs to the vehicle detection sensors, and Consultant shall be responsible for the costs of said maintenance and repairs. C. Parking Enterprise Management System (PEMS) Consultant shall provide CivicSmart’s PEMS backend management system which will provide the City with comprehensive reporting, ongoing management functionality, diagnostic services, and the ability to remotely manage, access, and modify meter programming. Consultant shall provide City with access to the ParkMobile 360 B-25 01203.0006/690887.3 A-2 Administrative Portal. Consultant shall provide the City with the following information with respect to the Services: i. Unique Transaction ID ii. Transaction Date/Time iii. Parking Session Start Date/Time iv. Parking Session End Date/Time v. Total Price Charged to End User vi. Price Breakdown (where applicable) including (1) Parking Fee; (2) Service Fee; (3) Discount Amount; and (4) Total Fee vii. Payment Method D. Customer Service Consultant shall provide customer service and support in connection with the Services for users who experience problems or have questions through a toll-free phone number. E. Signage and Stickers Consultant shall be responsible for the cost of standard signage and stickers for the initial deployment and any subsequent expansion of the City’s use of the Services. City shall be responsible for all installation of signage and stickers, and for the cost and installation of custom signage. II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. Pre-construction plans for all needed construction. B. As-Built Plans and final drawings in CAD and PDF formats at the end of construction. C. Operation and maintenance plan. III. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. Weekly status reports, containing information on work completed to date, work currently underway, and any potential problems or delays anticipated. B-26 01203.0006/690887.3 A-3 IV. All work is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City. V. Consultant shall provide safe and continuous passage for pedestrian and vehicular traffic in accordance with the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH), latest edition. VI. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: A. Garrett Snook, Director of Implementations B. Kristen Locke, CAPP, Senior Regional Sales Manager C. David Holler (On-Street Project Executive), Vice President Sales D. David Hoyt (Executive Sponsor), Senior Vice President Sales E. Donnie Senterfitt, Field Marketing Manager B-27 01203.0006/690887.3 B-1 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (Superseding Contract Boilerplate) Inserted text is indicated in bold italics, deleted text is indicated in strikethrough. I. Section 6.3 is amended to read as follows: 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials with the exception of ParkMobile end user data (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. II. Section 7.7, Liquidated Damages, is deleted in its entirety. B-28 01203.0006/690887.3 C-1 EXHIBIT “C” SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION I. I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks at the following rates: Number Item Quantities Unit Cost Sub-Total 1.1 Vehicle Detection Sensors 84 $125 $10,500 2.1 Gateway for Subterranean Mounted Vehicle Sensors 4 $400 $1,600 2.2 Directed Enforcement App 1 Included Included 2.3 Maintenance App 1 Included Included 3.1 Maintenance 5 Years Included Included 3.2 Back Office Configuration 1 $3,000 $3,000 3.3 Sensor Installation 84 $25 $2,100 3.4 Gateway Installation 4 $100 $400 4.1 Monthly Wireless Fee for Vehicle Detection Sensors 84 (12 months) $ 3.00 per sensor/per month $3,024 4.2 Monthly Fee for Gateway (per sensor/per month) 4 (12 months) $ 6.00 per gateway/per month $288 4.3 Monthly Fee for Reservation Platform 1 (12 months) $500 per month $6,000 TOTAL $26,912 II. A retention of ten percent (10%) shall be held from each payment as a contract retention to be paid as part of the final payment upon satisfactory completion of services. NOT APPLICABLE. B-29 01203.0006/690887.3 C-2 III. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.9. IV. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation. D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. V. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement. VI. The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1 NOT APPLICABLE. B-30 01203.0006/690887.3 D-1 EXHIBIT “D” SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE I. Consultant shall perform all work within seventy (70) calendar days following the City’s issuance of the Notice to Proceed (NTP). Prior to the City’s issuance of the NTP, Consultant shall submit a project schedule for approval by the Cit y. Consultant shall perform all work in accordance with the following schedule: Days to Perform Deadline Date A. Planning 15 Days 3 Weeks after issuance of NTP B. Pre-Installation 30 Days 7 Weeks after issuance of NTP C. Installation 10 Days 9 Weeks after issuance of NTP D. Post-Installation 5 Days 10 Weeks after issuance of NTP II. II. Consultant shall deliver the following tangible work products to the City by the following dates. A. Daily Reports will be delivered to the City weekly. Daily Reports must be delivered and accepted prior to any progress payment up until the date that work is being invoiced for. B. Weekly Reports will be submitted to the City with the Daily Reports for each week. C. Certified payroll will be delivered to the City biweekly. Certified payroll must be delivered and accepted prior to any progress payment up until the date that work is being invoiced for. III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2. B-31 Name of recreation area Angeles National Forest / San Gabriel Mountains  National Monument Eaton Canyon Claremont Hills Wilderness Park Agency that manages open space Federal ‐ USDA Forest Service Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation Municipal Agency ‐ Claremont Purpose To help sustain forests and grasslands for present and  future generations; balance short and long‐term needs of  people and nature Established to better connect people with more  than 550 miles of beautiful trails across the  County. Trails play a vital role in encouraging and  facilitating the outdoor recreation that  contributes to our health and wellbeing,  providing unparalleled opportunities for users. To  provide quality recreational opportunities that  promote a healthy lifestyle and strengthen the  community through diverse physical, educational  and cultural programming, and will enhance the  community environment by acquiring, developing  and maintaining County parks, gardens, golf  courses, trails, and open spaces.  To preserve open space in Claremont's hillsides and  protect this environmental resource while  secondarily allowing for human access for passive  recreation, education and enjoyment.  Size / mileage 650,000 acres; 557 miles of trails 198 acres; 3.5 miles (RT) 2,500 acres; 20 miles of trails (single track) Parking lot Available?  Yes, especially in areas with nature centers, designated  campgrounds, or popular trailheads. Not all areas have  parking lots available. These may also be shoulders /  turnouts along Highway 2, Highway 39, and other major  roadways in Angeles National Forest. Yes, 1 parking lot plus secondary (overflow)  parking lot during events or peak periods. Yes, 3 parking lots If Y, what is the capacity Various sizes. Primary parking lot 40 cars, secondary lot can  accommodate additional 100 cars. 20‐120 parking spaces If N, is street parking? How many parking spots Yes, especially in areas adjacent to the urban‐wildland  interface. These are still inside of ANF jurisdiction, and  refer to parking parallel to roadways where there are no  parking restrictions.  Street parking is limited. Reservation required per  vehicle OR 4 people.  Street parking is limited. In 2016, the City  implemented a residential parking permit program  on areas adjacent to the main entrance located on  Mills Avenue in an effort to reduce noise  complaints, trash, and unsafe driving conditions  during peak use.  Is Parking Free or Paid. Exceptions? Both. Fees are: Forest Adventure Pass ‐ $5 per day AND  Forest Adventure Pass Annual Pass ‐ $30 annually. Not all  areas require a pass. Generally, these are areas that do  not provide any of the three ammenities: parking lot,  restrooms, or visitor center.  Free parking. Parking restricted by gate hours  sunrise to sunset.  Street parking is free. Handicap is free. Only 2 lots  are paid. Parking fees vary: $5 / 4 hours during  weekdays, and on weekends after 10am., "Peak  Rates" are $7 / 4 hours, from park opening hours  (vary by month) to 10am on weekends. Residents  can obtain free parking permits "Residential  Parking Permits," valid at the South Parking Lot,  and patrons can purchase an annual parking permit  at $140 and prorated quarterly, valid at either of  the 2 parking lots (North and South Parking Lot). Parking / Access challenges Yes, in high use areas, including Chantry Flats (via Santa  Anita) and East Fork overexceed capacity. The result is  patrons parking illegally and unsafely.  There is one primary parking lot and adjacent  overflow lot, that funnels all park visitors to one  main entrance to the trails. This causes crowding  and congestion instead of dispersing people.  Prior to 2016, the public could park on residentail  neighborhoods, resulting in large foot traffic into  CHWP. In response to resident concerns and to  manage crowds, the City restricted parking. There  are a total of 11 access points, 7 are located in the  "front country" along the urban wildland interface,  and the remaining 4 are accessed outside of the  City's jurisdiction from the "backcountry" in  adjacent open space areas. Only 2 parking lots are  paid, and of these, only 1 has gates that are  secured by Park Rangers to control access into the  park during closures or peak use.  Reservation system in place to access trails during  COVID‐19? One‐way directional signage? No. USFS remained open during COVID‐19, with the  exception of nationwide closures due to fire concerns.  Visitor centers and campgrounds were closed or  operated at a lower capacity during COVID‐19.  Campground reservations may have been in place before  COVID‐19 based on popularity; others are on a first‐ come, first‐serve basis. Yes. Reservations for 24 hour in advance  (ActiveNet). Free permit, maximum of 4 people.  Blocks 3  hours, for a total of 85 reservations per  time slot. Issues included people not showing up  to their reservation, resulting in under capacity,  in initial weeks; later, patrons had difficulty  accessing park because of capacity having been  reached. No same day reservations or walk‐ins  permitted.  No reservation system in place. One‐way  directional signage was in place for 3 months along  a 5 mile stretch, the "Loop." Rangers educated  patrons, and asked users to turn around, but not  able to enforce. Who provides your enforcement on trails?  Sheriff Deputies and and Uniformed Law Enforcement  Officers (LEO) are authorized to carry firearms and other  devensive equipment, issue citations, make arrests,  execute search warrants, complete reports, and testify in  court. The regulations include 36 Code of Federal  Regulations (CFR) Parts 242 and 261, as well as Titles 18  and 21 of the U.S. Code  None. Docents and LA County Parks and  Recreation staff educate, but are not enforcing. Park Rangers Who provides your enforcement on parking?Sheriff Deputies primarily. None. Security company assists in monitoring  gate after hours (during special events). Park Rangers C-1 Name of recreation area Agency that manages open space Purpose Size / mileage Parking lot Available?  If Y, what is the capacity If N, is street parking? How many parking spots Is Parking Free or Paid. Exceptions? Parking / Access challenges Reservation system in place to access trails during  COVID‐19? One‐way directional signage? Who provides your enforcement on trails?  Who provides your enforcement on parking? Monrovia Canyon Park Monrovia Hillside Wilderness Preserve Municipal Agency ‐ Monrovia Municipal Agency ‐ Monrovia Opened in 1910, providing passive recreational  opportunities for the community; provide  educational events. Opened in 2016, providing passive recreational  opportunities for the community. 80 acres, 6.5 miles of trails (Single‐track)1,400 acres; 4.5 miles of trails (Single‐track) Yes, 4 parking areas No. Total capacity of 80 vehicles N/A Limited, street parking is available along Canyon  Blvd, patrons have to walk an additional 1/2 mile  to access trailheads.  Yes, limited street parking is available. The most parking  accessibility (roughly 20 spaces, shared access with  Monrovia Canyon Park) is along Ridegside Drive, where  patrons can park on Canyon Blvd and walk 1/4 mile North  of Briarcliff Drive. For two of the four access points,  parking is available 1/4 of a mile away from the trailhead.  Parking lot is paid, $5 per day on weekdays, and  $10 on weekends and holidays. Annual passes are  also available for $65, handicap placards can  purchase one for a reduced price of $45 Free.  Parking spaces are limited during peak periods,  such as summer weekends. Parking lot hours are  8am to 5pm. Patrons are consequently parking on  the street to access the park outside of these  hours.  Limited parking available. There are limited to no signs  indicating parking, or preserve until users access the  trailhead. Given limited parking availability, this is largely  hidden from the public, and is primarily used by  residents.  Yes, reservation in place (ActiveNet). Free to  reserve, but required payment of parking day‐of.  Permits available for 4 hour blocks. (Not enforced  by staff; no staff seen day‐of to confirm  reservation or turn away those not reserved). One‐ way directional signage to direct traffic on trails,  and partial closure of auxiliary trails on narrow  trails. Neither was enforced by staff. No. Park Naturalists educate, but do not have citation  authority. It is not currently enforced. Monrovia  PD responds to serious issues.  Park Naturalists educate, but do not have citation  authority. It is not currently enforced. Monrovia PD  responds to serious issues.  Park Naturalists educate, but do not have citation  authority. It is not currently enforced. Monrovia  PD responds to serious issues.  Park Naturalists educate, but do not have citation  authority. It is not currently enforced. Monrovia PD  responds to serious issues.  C-2 Name of recreation area Agency that manages open space Purpose Size / mileage Parking lot Available?  If Y, what is the capacity If N, is street parking? How many parking spots Is Parking Free or Paid. Exceptions? Parking / Access challenges Reservation system in place to access trails during  COVID‐19? One‐way directional signage? Who provides your enforcement on trails?  Who provides your enforcement on parking? Point Lobos State Natural Reserve Orange County Parks California State Parks Orange County Point Lobos State Natural Reserve is outstanding for sightseeing, photography, painting, nature study, picnicking, SCUBA diving, and jogging. In addition to the spectacular beauty, nearly every aspect of its resources is of scientific interest. There are rare plant communities, endangered archeological sites, unique geological formations, and incredibly rich flora and fauna of both land and sea. Point Lobos is a natural reserve, not a park, and afforded the highest level of statewide protection. The purpose of a reserve is to forever protect an area of unique natural beauty and ecological significance. Contains a Marine Protected Area. Protection of resources / natural resource management; stress  education first and citation last 5,560 acres 60,000 acres of wilderness parks / beaches/ regional parks /  historical places Yes. Yes.  Parking in the Reserve limited to 150 vehicles. No vehicles or  pedestrians may enter the Preserve after 4:30pm everyday.  North Coastal Unit ‐ 100 spots; Upper Newport Bay ‐ free  parking lot 7am to sunset (no enforcement); Harriet Weeder  Park ‐ 24 spaces (no fees); Talbot Park / Santa Ana Riverbed ‐  no parking lot, residential; Coastal Area ‐ pay per space  machine; OC Parks ‐ Annual pass and pay per space machine;  Laguna Beach ‐ parking enforcement;  No. There is limited parking on the shoulder of the highway, and then  patrons may walk into the Reserve.  Vehicles are $10; Seniors have discounted price at $9.00; Disabled  (with discount pass) $5.00. Bus (10‐24 passengers) $50 PERMIT Req.  Bus (25+ passengers) $100.00 PERMIT REQ. CA Explorer Annual Pass  $195.00; Golden Poppy Annual Pass $125.00 M‐F $3.00 per vehicle entry; Weekends $5.00 per vehicle entry  ($3.00 per vehicle at wilderness park or nature preserve). At  select parks with special events, parking is $7.00 on holidays.  (At County Beaches with Pay and Display Machines: $1.00 /  hour; no fee for vehicles with disabled license plates or  placard) The Reserve is very popular and will often be crowded during summer months and on holiday weekends. The Agency asks vehicles not to stop in the traffic lane on Highway 1. Patrons are encouranged to arrive early (before 9:30am) or later (after 3:00pm) to avoid congested periods. No. However, programs, campgrounds, and nature centers closed due  to COVID‐19.  Signs posted but not preventing entry; For special events only.  Nature centers are closed. Only restrooms are open.  Park Rangers Only civil citations, no criminal citations C-3 Name of recreation area Agency that manages open space Purpose Size / mileage Parking lot Available?  If Y, what is the capacity If N, is street parking? How many parking spots Is Parking Free or Paid. Exceptions? Parking / Access challenges Reservation system in place to access trails during  COVID‐19? One‐way directional signage? Who provides your enforcement on trails?  Who provides your enforcement on parking? Griffith Park El Dorado Regional Park Los Angeles City Municipal Agency ‐ Long Beach Griffith Park is one of the largest municipal urban parks;  provides numerous family attractions, an assortment of  educational and cultural institutions, and miles of hiking and  horseback riding trails and provides visitors an ideal  environment for enjoyable recreation activites. Recreation 4,210 acres 390 acres Yes.  Yes. Over 9 parking lots located around the perimeter of the park;  Parking lots are free, but may have restrictions on the hours. Not available.  Yes, street parking is available. In areas closest to Griffith  Observatory, fees are implemented at the following rates  below.LADOT Dash Bus shuttle is available 7 days a week from  10am to 10pm, running every 15‐20 minutes in congested areas  and limited parking availlability on weekends, holidays, and  during the summer.  Parking is free with the exception of Western Canyon Road  (adjacent to Griffith Observatory and Greek Parking when  theatere is in use) with enforcement every day of the year M‐F  from noon to 10pm and weekends from 10am to 10pm. Parking  fees increase over peak season / holidays.  Fees are currently  $15/hr. Weekdays is $6; Fridays: $7; Weekends: $8 and holidays $9;  Annual pass for $65 per year, for ADA reduced parking fee of  $40 per year During holidays and summer weekends, peak use is reached.  Parking is limited, causing delays. In an effort to curtail and  disperse use, shuttle is available and parking fees increase.  Parking is shared by patrons hiking as well as those visiting  educaitonal / cultural areas such as the Los Angeles Zoo, Griffith  Observatory, Greek Theatere, and Travel Town.  Not available. Pre‐payment system via parking attendant at  entrance of area.  None. Park remained open during COVID‐19. Signs have been  mounted on popular trailheads to remind visitors to maintain  social distancing, stay at home when exhibiting signs of  symptoms, and masks.  None.  Park Rangers.  Park Rangers (through Long Beach Police Department).  Park Rangers. Park Rangers (through Long Beach Police Department).  Enforcement is done after hours and for other violations. C-4 Name of recreation area Agency that manages open space Purpose Size / mileage Parking lot Available?  If Y, what is the capacity If N, is street parking? How many parking spots Is Parking Free or Paid. Exceptions? Parking / Access challenges Reservation system in place to access trails during  COVID‐19? One‐way directional signage? Who provides your enforcement on trails?  Who provides your enforcement on parking? MRCA Managed Lands in Malibu Malibu Creek State Park Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority California State Parks (Point Dume and Paradise Point MPA) Dedicated to the acquisition, preservation, and protection of open space, wildlife  habitat, and urban, mountain, and river parkland that is easily accessible to the  public. Preservation and recreation. 92 acres (of managed space in Malibu)8,215 acres Yes Yes. Lower Lot open (Upper Lot closed during COVID‐19) Some parkings are free. Varies in size. Not available. Yes. None.  Varies. Free to $5 to $12 for daily use. All day ‐ $12, 3 hours ‐ $9, 2 hour ‐ $6, 1 hour ‐ $3 The City of Malibu does not manage the parking lots. All parking lots are  managed by California State Parks, or MRCA. No transactions at entrance station. Annual passmembers or pay by phone only.  No reservation system. Social distancing and mask signage. Language on their  website indicates MRCA‐managed parks and trails may close depending on park  users' compliance with public health directives. If the public or MRCA are at risk  because of how the parks and trails are being used. Some MRCA‐managed  Malibu coastal accessways remain closed. These accessways are constrained  physically so that they cannot allow for recommended social distancing.    The park is open from dawn to dusk to active recreation with restrictions in place to  encourage social distancing and reduce group gatherings. Campgrounds  ‐ day use at  reduced capacity, reservation required.  Park Rangers and uniformed staff, including volunteers from the Santa Monica  Mountains Bike Unit and the California Emergency Mobile Patrol (a search and  rescue team). Park Rangers Park Rangers with support from City of Malibu Police Department Park Rangers C-5 Name of recreation area Agency that manages open space Purpose Size / mileage Parking lot Available?  If Y, what is the capacity If N, is street parking? How many parking spots Is Parking Free or Paid. Exceptions? Parking / Access challenges Reservation system in place to access trails during  COVID‐19? One‐way directional signage? Who provides your enforcement on trails?  Who provides your enforcement on parking? Crystal Cove State Park Dana Point State Marine Conservation Area California State Parks (MPA) California State Parks (MPA) Preservation and recreation. Preservation and recreation. 2,400 acres  2,208 square miles Yes, various.  Yes.  Size varies from 5 spaces to 200 spaces. Various size with over 300 spaces along the perimeter  of the beach. Several smaller parkings lots are  available along the Nature Center and the Ocean  Institute.  No. Yes.  Paid parking. Payment system via Skidata. Prices are  as follows: $8 on weekdays, $15 on weekends. If  patrons purchase at any of the businesses inside of  Crystal Cove SP area, they can receive parking  validation for 3 hours with minimum purchase.   Free. Not available.  Parking reaches capacity during peak periods. It is  adjacnet to the Ocean Institute as well as Dana Cove  Harbor where boats and fishermen can dock. It is a  public beach. Parking can be limited.  None. None.  Park Rangers and uniformed staff.Police Department Park Rangers and uniformed staff. Police Department C-6 DESCRIPTION 2016/17 NCCP CURRENT FY 20-21 VARIANCES COSTS RELATED TO FULFILLING CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS Misc. City Restoration Activities 30,000 20,300 (9,700) AA/Open Space Manager (15%)43,784 20,900 (22,884) Recreation Specialist (10%)21,126 5,200 (15,926) Non-wasting Endowment 10,000 10,000 - Endowment 144,300 153,600 9,300 SUB-TOTAL COSTS RELATED TO FULFILLING CONSERVATION REQ.249,210 210,000 (39,210) COSTS RELATED TO PUBLIC ACCESS AND LAND OWNERSHIP Public Safety 567,000 308,300 (258,700) AA/Open Space Manager (50%)145,946 69,700 (76,246) Recreation Supervisor I (75%)- 61,700 61,700 Recreation Specialist (50%)105,628 17,400 (88,228) PT OSM Staff Positions 113,900 96,900 (17,000) Reporting Line/Phone Service 2,400 2,400 - Regulatory Literature 2,500 1,000 (1,500) Other - Misc. Supplies 31,000 29,000 (2,000) Maintenance Superintendent (5%)16,227 7,000 (9,227) Maintenance Supervisor (5%)12,181 5,700 (6,481) Maintenance Worker (5%)8,135 3,900 (4,235) Vehicles 2,197 2,400 203 Brush Management 108,000 425,000 317,000 Bird Surveys 30,000 10,000 (20,000) Sanitation Control/Maintenance 16,000 145,000 129,000 Portable Restrooms 15,000 14,000 (1,000) Landslide Abatement Districts 60,096 121,800 61,704 Road Maintenance 25,000 25,000 - Trail/Misc. Maintenance 15,000 20,500 5,500 Access Signs 10,000 10,000 - SUB-TOTAL COSTS RELATED TO PUBLIC ACCESS & LAND OWNERSHIP 1,286,210 1,376,700 90,490 NEW/ADDITIONAL PROGRAMS PV Transit Pilot Program - 20,000 20,000 Code Enforcement for Parking Enforcement - 40,000 40,000 SUB-TOTAL OF NEW/ADDITIONAL PROGRAMS - 60,000 60,000 TOTAL PRESERVE ANNUAL BUDGET 1,535,420 1,646,700 111,280 CAPITAL PROJECTS (since FY 16/17)AMOUNT NOTES Burma Trailhead Gate 54,197 contract approved on 9/1/20 Rattlesnake Trailhead Gate 120,995 contract approved on 10/6/20 Coastal Bluff Fence (Vicente Bluffs Reserve)318,479 contract approved on 5/19/20 Coastal Bluff Fence (Abalone Cove, Portuguese Point, and Inspiration Point)216,620 NOC approved on 4/2/19 Coastal Bluff Fence (Lower Point Vicente)104,562 NOC approved on 2/6/18 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 814,853 D-1 APPENDIX C Management Budget Analysis _____________________________________________________________________________________ C-41 Exhibit C-2: ANNUAL COSTS During Permit Term Post Permit Term* Costs Related to Fulfilling Conservation Requirements BIOTIC SURVEYS Specifications unit number cost / unit interval PVPLC City FY 16-17 Costs Total PVPLC City Total PVPLC Staff biologists, project mgrs. hours 200 $90 1 $18,000 $0 $18,000 $0 $0 $0 Plant Ecologist Restoration Ecologist hours 330 $90 3 $9,900 $0 $9,900 $0 $0 $0 Wildlife Biologist outside expert hours 220 $90 3 $6,600 $0 $6,600 $0 $0 $0 Entomologist outside expert hours 80 $75 3 $2,000 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 Conservation Director PVPLC staff hours 120 $75 1 $9,000 $0 $9,000 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $45,500 $0 $45,500 $0 $0 $0 HABITAT RESTORATION Specifications unit number cost / unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Misc. City Restoration Activities annual budget n/a n/a n/a n/a $0 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $30,000 $30,000 AA/Open Space Manager (15%) permit monitoring/management hr n/a 150.15 n/a $0 $43,784 $43,784 $0 $43,784 $43,784 Recreation Specialist (10%) permit monitoring/management hr n/a 108.67 n/a $0 $21,126 $21,126 $0 $21,126 $21,126 Site Analysis field survey & report hours 16 $90 1 $1,440 $0 $1,440 $0 $0 $0 Restoration Plan plan/report hours 200 $90 3 $6,000 $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 Organic Debris Removal 5 acres clearing acre 5 $1,200 1 $6,000 $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 Soil Amendments misc. yard 5 $75 1 $375 $0 $375 $0 $0 $0 Straw for erosion control bale 50 $10 1 $500 $0 $500 $0 $0 $0 Seed Collection native seed hours 200 $75 1 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 Seed Purchase native seed lb 45 $50 1 $2,250 $0 $2,250 $0 $0 $0 Plant Procurement native plants 4" pot 1,500 $5 1 $7,500 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 Revegetation flag plant locations hours 24 $40 1 $960 $0 $960 $0 $0 $0 Revegetation plant installation hours 324 $35 1 $11,340 $0 $11,340 $0 $0 $0 Seed Installation Hydroseeding acre 5 $6,000 1 $30,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 Irrigation System DriWater/Irrigation acre 5 $12,000 1 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 Irrigation water and meter Cal Water cubic foot 2,500 $4 1 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 Exotic Plant Control hand removal, or backpack spray hours 1,000 $35 1 $35,000 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 Exotic Plant Control Herbicide gallon 10 $100 1 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 E-1 APPENDIX C Management Budget Analysis _____________________________________________________________________________________ C-42 Subtotal $187,365 $94,910 $282,275 $0 $94,910 $94,910 SITE CONSTRUCTION/MAINT Specifications unit number cost / unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Salvage Plant Materials hours 40 $28 1 $1,120 $0 $1,120 $0 $0 $0 Salvage /stockpile Topsoil hours 40 $28 1 $1,120 $0 $1,120 $0 $0 $0 Fence, Protective Plastic high visibility feet 2,000 $1 3 $833 $0 $833 $0 $0 $0 Fence - Installed chain link for plant yard feet 200 $50 30 $333 $0 $333 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $3,406 $0 $3,406 $0 $0 $0 HABITAT MAINTENANCE Specifications unit number cost/unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Erosion Control slope stabilization hours 20 $28 1 $560 $0 $560 $0 $0 $0 Straw erosion control bale 50 $10 1 $500 $0 $500 $0 $0 $0 Exotic Plant Control hand removal , weed whip or herbicide app hours 1,760 $35 1 $61,600 $0 $61,600 $0 $0 $0 Exotic Plant Control Herbicide gallon 20 $100 1 $2,000 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 Other misc. supplies item 1 $2,500 1 $2,500 $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $67,160 $0 $67,160 $0 $0 $0 FIELD EQUIPMENT Specifications unit number cost/unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total GPS, Rover & Base Unit gps w. mapping capability item 2 $1,000 5 $400 $0 $400 $0 $0 $0 Vehicle pickup truck item 0.5 $16,000 5 $1,600 $0 $1,600 $0 $0 $0 Vehicle Mileage mile 12,000 $0.55 1 $6,600 $0 $6,600 $0 $0 $0 Vehicle Insurance Insurance year 0.5 $3,500 1 $1,750 $0 $1,750 $0 $0 $0 Camera 35mm lens Digital item 1 $350 5 $70 $0 $70 $0 $0 $0 Chemical Sprayer backpack sprayer item 1 $200 3 $67 $0 $67 $0 $0 $0 Other misc. supplies item 1 $2,047 1 $2,047 $0 $2,047 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $12,534 $0 $12,534 $0 $0 $0 VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR Specifications unit number cost/unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Volunteer Coordinator coordination, outdoor workdays hours 300 $35 1 $10,500 $0 $10,500 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $10,500 $0 $10,500 $0 $0 $0 REPORTING Specifications unit number cost/unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Database Management data input hours 80 $80 1 $6,400 $0 $6,400 $0 $0 $0 GIS/CAD Management data management hours 40 $90 1 $3,600 $0 $3,600 $0 $0 $0 Photodocumentation field survey hours 80 $65 1 $5,200 $0 $5,200 $0 $0 $0 Agency Report annual report hours 60 $90 1 $5,400 $0 $5,400 $0 $0 $0 E-2 APPENDIX C Management Budget Analysis _____________________________________________________________________________________ C-43 Monitoring Reports monitoring documentation hours 120 $90 1 $10,800 $0 $10,800 $0 $0 $0 Report Production Labor hours 20 $60 1 $1,200 $0 $1,200 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $32,600 $0 $32,600 $0 $0 $0 OFFICE MAINTENANCE Specifications unit number cost/unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Administrative Operations hours 80 $90 1 $3,240 $0 $3,240 $0 $0 $0 Telephone Charges, Annual phone charges item 2 $600 1 $600 $0 $600 $0 $0 $0 Office Supplies, Year Stationery item 1 $100 1 $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 $0 Office Supplies, Year Supplies item 1 $200 1 $200 $0 $200 $0 $0 $0 Copier Copier item 0.5 $500 8 $31 $0 $31 $0 $0 $0 Fax Machine Fax item 0.5 $400 5 $40 $0 $40 $0 $0 $0 Deskjet Printer Printer item 1 $500 6 $83 $0 $83 $0 $0 $0 Other misc. supplies item 1 $1,000 1 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $5,294 $0 $5,294 $0 $0 $0 OPERATIONS Specifications unit number cost/unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Audit CPA audit item 0.5 $11,000 1 $5,500 $0 $5,500 $0 $0 $0 Contracts produce contracts hours 50 $80 1 $4,000 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 Conservation Easement Monitoring* $0 $0 $0 $22,030 $0 $22,030 Other misc. items item 1 $1,000 1 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $10,500 $0 $10,500 $22,030 $0 $22,030 ENDOWMENT* Specifications unit number cost/unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Non-Wasting Endowment $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 City Payment to PVPLC annual rate n/a n/a n/a n/a ($144,300) $144,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal ($144,300) $144,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 SUBTOTAL: COSTS RELATED TO FULLFILLING CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS $230,559 $249,210 $479,769 $22,030 $94,910 $116,940 COSTS RELATED TO PUBLIC ACCESS AND LAND OWNERSHIP PUBLIC SERVICES Specifications unit number Cost / unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Public Safety** Enforcement/Patrol contract 80hrs/wk n/a 1 $0 $567,000 $567,000 $0 $567,000 $567,000 AA/Open Space Manager (50%) personnel hr n/a 150.15 n/a $0 $145,946 $145,946 $0 $145,946 $145,946 E-3 APPENDIX C Management Budget Analysis _____________________________________________________________________________________ C-44 Recreation Specialist (50%) personnel hr n/a 108.67 n/a $0 $105,628 $105,628 $0 $105,628 $105,628 PT OSM Staff Positions personnel n/a ~85 hrs/wk n/a n/a $0 $113,900 $113,900 $0 $113,900 $113,900 Reporting Line/Phone Service 24-7 call service n/a n/a n/a n/a $0 $2,400 $2,400 $0 $2,400 $2,400 Docent Training meetings hours 40 $25 1 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 Interpretive Literature labor hours 40 $45 1 $1,800 $0 $1,800 $0 $0 $0 Interpretive Literature copy page 2,000 $0.20 1 $400 $0 $400 $0 $0 $0 Regulatory Literature printing costs n/a n/a n/a n/a $0 $2,500 $2,500 $0 $2,500 $2,500 Community Outreach meetings hours 80 $40 1 $3,160 $0 $3,160 $0 $0 $0 Other Misc. Operating supplies n/a n/a n/a n/a $1,000 $31,000 $32,000 $0 $31,000 $31,000 Subtotal $7,360 $968,374 $975,734 $0 $968,374 $968,374 GENERAL MAINTENANCE Specifications unit number cost/unit interval PVPLC City Total PVPLC City Total Maintenance Superintendent (5%) personnel n/a n/a 166.94 hr $0 $16,227 $16,227 $0 $16,227 $16,227 Maintenance Supervisor (5%) personnel n/a n/a 125.32 hr $0 $12,181 $12,181 $0 $12,181 $12,181 Maintenance Worker (5%) personnel n/a n/a 83.69 hr $0 $8,135 $8,135 $0 $8,135 $8,135 Vehicles Pickup and Polaris' item 2 n/a n/a $0 $2,197 $2,197 $0 $2,197 $2,197 Brush Management fuel modification zones annual budget n/a n/a 1 $5,000 $108,000 $113,000 $5,000 $108,000 $113,000 Bird Surveys As needed annual budget n/a n/a 1 $0 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $30,000 $30,000 Sanitation Control collection & disposal item 1 $ - 1 $0 $16,000 $16,000 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Portable Restrooms rental and cleaning item 4 $2,500 1 $0 $15,000 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $15,000 Landslide Abatement Districts maintenance n/a 2 n/a 1 $0 $60,096 $60,096 $0 $60,096 $60,096 Road Maintenance Burma Road item 1 $25,000 1 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $25,000 Trail/Misc. Maintenance maintenance as needed n/a n/a 1 $0 $15,000 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $15,000 Trail maintenance hours 200 $28 1 $5,600 $0 $5,600 $0 $0 $0 Sign access and regs item 80 varies 1 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 Sign, Metal metal item 40 $50 10 $200 $0 $200 $0 $0 $0 Sign, Metal trail markers item 25 $20 1 $500 $0 $500 $0 $0 $0 Sign interpretive item 4 $2,000 10 $800 $0 $800 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $12,100 $317,835 $329,935 $5,000 $317,835 $322,835 SUBTOTAL: COSTS RELATED TO PUBLIC ACCESS AND LAND OWNERSHIP $19,460 $1,286,209 $1,305,669 $5,000 $1,286,209 $1,291,209 E-4 1/11/2021 Fw: Act to Protect Residents - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/2 Fw: Act to Protect Residents Hello Mr. Bell, Thank you for your email and especially for your observaons. Hearing directly from residents impacted by Preserve use is extremely helpful as the City moves forward towards soluons to Preserve access and parking. At the December 15 City Council meeng, the City Council directed staff to conduct a traffic analysis of mulple Preserve access areas, including the Ladera Linda/Forrestal Reserve area. The traffic consultant will be looking at traffic calming and circulaon, among other things. Staff ancipates this informaon will help the City move towards improved condions in several Preserve parking and access areas. Regarding health concerns related to the Covid-19 Pandemic, the City follows the LA County Health orders related to this pandemic. City staff sit on the LA County Trails and Open Space Task Force, where we coordinate with trail and open space managers across LA County to implement LA County Health orders related to trails and open space. The Task Force also shares operaonal efforts to improve user experience and safety. It is true that across LA County there are differing levels of compliance with social distancing and mask requirements. However the City, with this Task Force, works together to opmize compliance and public safety. The City Council will be considering a City Council agenda item on January 19 related to Preserve access and parking. Your email will be included as correspondence to the agenda item, and below are instrucons on parcipang. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas Thank you again for your email. Thank you, Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 Katie Lozano Thu 1/7/2021 9:22 AM To:dwbrpv@gmail.com <dwbrpv@gmail.com>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov>; 2 attachments PVDSsunset.pdf; ATT00001.htm; F-1 1/11/2021 Fw: Act to Protect Residents - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/2 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. -------- Original message -------- From: Donald Bell <dwbrpv@gmail.com> Date: 1/6/21 09:14 (GMT-08:00) To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>, Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>, Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov>, Ken Rukavina <krukavina@rpvca.gov>, Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>, PC <PC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Home Bell <dwbrpv@gmail.com> Subject: Act to Protect Residents To RPV City Leaders, F-2 1/12/2021 Katie Lozano - Outlook Web App https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=IAttachmentViewModelPopoutFactory&AttachmentJson=%7B"__type"%3A"FileAttachment%3A%23Exchange…1/1 You are currently viewing:PVDSsunset.pdf (3 MB )Print...Help You can either click the link to open the original attachment or right-click the link to save the file. Page  1   of  1 F-3 1/11/2021 Fw: About trails - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/2 Fw: About trails Hello Ms. Boutell, Thank you for your email. It will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. To clarify, at this me, the City Council is considering parking soluons (potenally including parking fees and reservaons) only at Crenshaw Blvd. south of Crest Rd. This area is the only parking access for the Portuguese Bend Reserve. Changes to parking in other areas, including Ocean Trails Reserve, are not being acvely considered at this City Council meeng. To parcipate in the meeng, please use the link below. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas Thank you, Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. -----Original Message----- From: tina boutell [mailto:iamtroublet@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 6:44 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: About trails Hello, I saw on a paper at one of the trails that you want to charge people to park, or parking by permit. I have been hiking the trails of rpv for over 15 years, on the weekends it normally got busy but there were still parking in parking lot. Now days the trail has been gotten more people due to Covid and there gyms closing. Sometimes to the point the parking lot is full and they start parking on street( la rotunda ) I believe this is where people are complaining . Now I don’t think the parking lots Katie Lozano Mon 1/11/2021 1:05 PM To:iamtroublet@yahoo.com <iamtroublet@yahoo.com>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; F-4 1/11/2021 Fw: About trails - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/2 should cost to park in them, but I do believe you should not allow parking on the street with out permit on weekends, this will cut down on the traffic in and out. I don’t think you should gouge people for money for parking in the parking lot. I hike the trail near trumps golf course at least 4 to 5 times a week. If you Put parking signs on the street, saying no parking with out permit on weekends that will slow down the traffic. I realize people live up there, but by putting charging people that have been hiking there for years is unfair to us! I’m sure it will all go back to normal once this pandemic is over. And there will be less traffic and with the permit parking on the streets it still will limit people up there . Please protect the people that have been doing this for years by not charging us and limiting our time to enjoy the trails . Thank you Tina Boutell F-5 1/11/2021 Fw: Public Comments: Council Meeting Jan 19, 2021_ PV Nature... - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/2 Fw: Public Comments: Council Meeting Jan 19, 2021_ PV Nature Preserve Parking & Access Mitigation Status Report Hello Ms. Brown, Thank you for your email. It will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. To parcipate in the meeng, please use the link below. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas Thank you, Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. From: Raquel Brown <raquelbrown614@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 11:47 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Public Comments: Council Meeng Jan 19, 2021_ PV Nature Preserve Parking & Access Migaon Status Report Aached are public comments fro the council's review.. thank you! Keep well, Raquel Brown, RPV resident Katie Lozano Mon 1/11/2021 4:35 PM To:raquelbrown614@yahoo.com <raquelbrown614@yahoo.com>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; 1 attachment Public Comment Brown_ Jan 19, 2021_ Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Parking and Access Mitigation Status Report.pdf; F-6 1/11/2021 Fw: Public Comments: Council Meeting Jan 19, 2021_ PV Nature... - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/2 F-7 Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Parking and Access Mitigation Status Report Public Comments: Council Meeting, January 19, 2021 Submitted: Raquel Brown, RPV resident (January 10, 2021) I believe the current options under consideration, to include shuttling visitors around the city to the trails, will have negative collateral impact of increasing direct and indirect cost, damage/wear and tear throughout the community, which I have observed since temporary parking has been extended on Crenshaw, and increased liability for injury. Additionally, I have observed the danger posed by the temporary parking on Crenshaw to drivers & pedestrians. Crenshaw is a busy artery and parked cars & pedestrians present a safety threat: drivers navigating cars parking/exiting as well as unpredictable movement of pedestrians/pets while those parking/parked are subjected to safety hazards of exiting/entering their car on the traffic side of the street In the area of Crenshaw from Crestridge to Crest there are a number of mostly unoccupied parking lots associated with public and private organizations which would be excellent for overflow parking and would provide the organizations passive income that would be attractive. One or in combination, the proposed options would provide safe, accessible and self-contained parking for the highest demand trail/area. Parking options considerations for Del Cerro/Portuguese Bend trail access: Palos Verdes Arts Center St John Fischer’s Church Mary & Joseph Retreat Center Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority Rancho Del Mar Continuation High School Softball Field Parking Lot: Rancho Del Mar Continuation High School Thank you for your consideration! F-8 1/11/2021 Fw: Permit parking at Del Cerro - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/1 Fw: Permit parking at Del Cerro Hello Ms. McLaughlin, Thank you for your email. It will be included as correspondence with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. Thank you, Katie Lozano Senior Administrative Analyst Recreation, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service.  Some employees are working on rotation and may be working remotely.  Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed.  For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. -----Original Message----- From: Donna Mclaughlin <ddmclaughlin@cox.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 11:23 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Permit parking at Del Cerro I am a resident of Rancho Palos Verdes and I have a permit to park at the Del Cerro parking lot. I have listened to the meetings in the past where people want that area to not be permit parking. I am requesting city Council to keep this area permit parking only. You have listened to the people in the nearby area making requests and you have listened to non- residents making request please listen to the rest of the Rancho Palos Verdes residents who want to have permit parking only at Del Cerro Park remain as is. Thank you Donna McLaughlin RPV resident Sent from Donna's iPhone Katie Lozano Thu 1/7/2021 8:32 AM To:ddmclaughlin@cox.net <ddmclaughlin@cox.net>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; F-9 1/11/2021 Fw: Permit parking at Del Cerro area - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/2 Fw: Permit parking at Del Cerro area Hello Mr. McLaughlin, Thank you for your email. It will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. To parcipate in the meeng, please use the link below. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas Thank you, Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. -----Original Message----- From: dennisgmclaughlin@gmail.com <dennisgmclaughlin@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 11:01 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Permit parking at Del Cerro area This is to request that the resident permit parking at Del Cerro remain as is. The City Council has been responsive to residents of that immediate area, and you have entertained requests of non-residents that they be allowed to park... without restrictions. This is to request that you also consider the wishes of the tax-paying RPV residents. I have lived in RPV, owned a home and used these trails since 1974, and I followed the rule and got the permit to park in the designated spots. Please retain this particular permit parking. I am sure neighboring cities in the South Bay all have various permits which are exclusive to those cities. Katie Lozano Fri 1/8/2021 12:27 PM To:dennisgmclaughlin@gmail.com <dennisgmclaughlin@gmail.com>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; F-10 1/11/2021 Fw: Permit parking at Del Cerro area - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/2 Thank you. Dennis McLaughlin Resident of RPV F-11 1/11/2021 Fw: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Parking Mitigation Status M... - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/2 Fw: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Parking Mitigation Status Meeting 1/19/21 Hello Mr. and Ms. Fernandez, Thank you for your email. It will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. To parcipate in the meeng, please use the link below. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas Thank you, Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. -----Original Message----- From: Carrie Fernandez [mailto:carrfer@cox.net] Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2021 2:55 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: mfernand@cox.net Subject: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Parking Mitigation Status Meeting 1/19/21 Hello, We are residents of Island View. Once again, we are writing to you to express our disappointment & frustration with the City’s solutions to mitigate the parking problems on Crenshaw. We watched the meeting on 12/15/20 & we were so disappointed with the proposed solutions to alleviate the parking problems particularly south of Crest on Crenshaw. If you are going to re-open the red space parking & Del Cerro parking, you are not going to solve anything. You will make things worse. Even if you implement a parking app system and charge fees, you still have the car & foot traffic. The shuttle service also is not helpful because it will build up queues at pick up locations and increase foot traffic. Your solutions all accommodate everyone else at the expense of all residents. As was mentioned at Katie Lozano Mon 1/11/2021 4:46 PM To:carrfer@cox.net <carrfer@cox.net>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; F-12 1/11/2021 Fw: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Parking Mitigation Status M... - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/2 the last meeting, you need to limit the amount of people on the trails. The hikers continue to leave trash & dog feces, destroy property, trespass on private property & ruin the trails. The erosion on the trails and vegetation damage keeps mounting. The hikers who speak at these mitigation meetings have absolutely no consideration for the residents who live near the trails. It’s all about them & their happiness. What about the residents of the surrounding neighborhoods that have to endure the negative impact on our once peaceful neighborhoods. In fact, we can’t even walk to Del Cerro anymore because there are so many people often ignoring COVID protocols without caring. We would like to know how much these solutions are going to cost the City. Are we going to recoup the million that we already spent & the unknown amount we are going to spend making these visitors happy? We urge the City to fix the problem they created & listen to the residents being affected. Crenshaw & Del Cerro should not be used as a parking lot. It was never meant for that. You need to find another location for these visitors to park. Thank you, Marc & Carrie Fernandez Sent from my iPad F-13 1/12/2021 Fw: PV Nature Preserve - parking Mitigation Status Report Co... - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/3 Fw: PV Nature Preserve - parking Mitigation Status Report Comments Hello Mr. and Ms. Kernan, Thank you for your email. The City is currently working on the Preserve Parking and Access Project/Effort to disperse acvity from Burma Rd, to the other Reserves that have amenies that can support higher levels of use (i.e. off-street parking and restrooms). It is important to note, that this is not an effort to draw addional visitors to the Preserve, but to disperse use appropriately and in a controlled way to lessen the impact at Burma Rd./Crenshaw Blvd., which is the Preserve's heaviest use access point. Part of this project includes implemenng parking soluons on Crenshaw Blvd. which include dedicated parking enforcement, and possibly parking reservaons and fees. It also includes working to determine Preserve carrying capacity guidelines and working with a Search Engine Opmizaon consultant to change the ways the Preserve is portrayed online (and aiming to correct online representaons of the Preserve that would point the general public to Burma Rd. as the primary access point to the Preserve). The project of course, also looks to improve the quality of life for residents at busy trailheads. A project taking place simultaneously is mapping trail widths, and working with our habitat managers and wildlife agencies to determine appropriate widths to maximize habitat conservaon. The City's Park Rangers strictly enforce the no smoking/open flames ordinance. If you would please provide a map or more specifics on the locaon, and mes of day you see the violaon, staff will address it. Your email will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. To parcipate in the meeng, please use the link below. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas I hope this informaon is helpful, and thank you again for your email and observaons. Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. Katie Lozano Tue 1/12/2021 2:11 PM To:jredlin@partneresi.com <jredlin@partneresi.com>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; F-14 1/12/2021 Fw: PV Nature Preserve - parking Mitigation Status Report Co... - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/3 From: Redlin, Jenny <jredlin@partneresi.com> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 4:54 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Kernen Mark (markkernen@hotmail.com) <markkernen@hotmail.com> Subject: PV Nature Preserve - parking Migaon Status Report Comments To Whom it May Concern: Thank you for your help with this maer. The added visitors to the area has become much more than I am sure anyone ever ancipated. While I am sure my concerns have been voiced by others, I thought I would take the me to re-iterate them here in hopes that you will connue the good work to help alleviate these issues: 1. Safety concerns a. Addional traffic at the top of Crenshaw makes it very difficult to enter and exit the neighborhood safely. Visitors speed, double park and preform illegal U-turns constantly. b. Traffic is routed through the dead end neighborhood and visitors do not obey the speed limit and are oen lost and not paying aenon- there are many children in the neighborhood (4 at my house right when these visitors turn the corner into the neighborhood) and I am very concerned for their safety with the speeding and distracted drivers. We are constantly out front asking the drivers to slow down to no avail. c. Smoking in the Canyon- on numerous occasions we have watched visitors stand in the empty lot we can see from our backyard and smoke cigars and cigarees over the very dry Canyon. If we have been walking by these folks while walking our dog we try to remind them that this is a fire danger and are not received well- either ignored or hosle responses. d. Increased break in and package the in the neighborhood. We personally had to file our first police report last year for this exact misfortune. 2. Environmental Concerns a. The amount of trash from visitors is geng out of control. We have taken it upon ourselves to implement a weekly clean up day where we take the children out to collect trash and come home with bags full- mostly facemask and food containers. b. There are not any facilies for the hikers to ulize. We have had people ulize the bushes on the other side of our wall to alleviate themselves. c. The erosion on the trails themselves- what were meant to be smaller trails that would have lile to no impact of the natural fauna have widened significantly and no vegetaon is able to grow. d. Impact on the wildlife the preserve was meant to protect. Upon the inial determinaon to make this area a preserve was their an analysis done on the average amount of visitors the preserve could sustain without impacng the wildlife and plant life? Is the Environmental Impact Report and inial Traffic Study that was likely done in conjuncon with the inial establishing of the preserve available to review? 3. Quality of Life concerns a. All of the above have greatly affected the residents Quality of Life in a neighborhood that was once so tranquil. In closing, we have been in the neighborhood for 10 years now and have lived in 2 houses in the neighborhood- that is how much we love our neighbors up here. We are deeply saddened by the overuse of this one entrance of the Preserve especially when there are so many other entry points with suitable, if not beer, parking soluons. When I want to use the preserve for instance, I easily walk to another entrance on Crest Road and see very few people on my hike (even on a busy weekend). But if you go through the Burma Trail entrance it is incredibly crowded all of the me now. It probably doesn’t help that the “Portuguese Bend Reserve Desnaon with trails and wildlife” is pinned at the top of the Burma Road trail- it is direcng everyone there. F-15 1/12/2021 Fw: PV Nature Preserve - parking Mitigation Status Report Co... - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…3/3 Thank you again for your efforts in this maer. Jenny and Mark Kernen RPV Residents F-16 1/11/2021 Fw: Parking on Crenshaw - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/2 Fw: Parking on Crenshaw Hello Ms. Mock, Thank you for your email. It will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. The City is going to be working together with the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy to use closure methods and enforcement to keep people from using the illegal spur trails that run between Ralesnake Trail and the stairs. We plan to start this process aer we install the gate at Ralesnake Trail to reduce vandalism of the closures, as it will be a large project. To parcipate in the meeng, please use the link below. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas Thank you, Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. From: Janet Mock [mailto:janetlmock@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 10:00 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Parking on Crenshaw Dear Members of the Council, I appreciate all the work the city is doing to try and resolve the parking issues along Crenshaw, and redirecting people from entering the Preserve at the Burma Road and Rattlesnake Trial entrances. I realize it is a complicated situation. But, I do believe the needs of the hikers are outweighing the needs of the homeowners that live around the Preserve. I feel any parking south of Crenshaw is always going to cause congestion. Cars will still be coming down the street looking for available parking spaces. Opening up the parking at De Cerro to public, just adds more parking to the public, and more cars coming down Crenshaw. I don't see how a parking app is going to cut down on traffic. Katie Lozano Mon 1/11/2021 4:56 PM To:janetlmock@aol.com <janetlmock@aol.com>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; F-17 1/11/2021 Fw: Parking on Crenshaw - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/2 I am hoping the City will extend the fencing along Rattlesnake Trail to keep hikers from making spur trails from Island View stairs to Rattlesnake Trail. We recently erected a fence to keep people from trespassing, and using our park as an entrance to the Preserve. That fence, greatly diminished the ambience of our park and doesn't keep people off the stairs. Erosion from these spur trails is a concern. I am also concerned about the amount of people hiking each day. How does this affect the nature of the preserve? Is it hard on the animals and vegetation that Preserve is meant to protect? Is it possible to limit the amount of people inside the Preserve? Because there are so many people using Crenshaw as a parking lot, I feel I have lost my neighborhood. You have heard all the complaints from the residents. I hope the City Council will hear us and understand that we deserve to have quality of life and quiet neighborhoods that we used to enjoy. Respectfully yours, Janet Mock 35 Santa Barbara Drive F-18 1/11/2021 Re: Del Cerro - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/2 Re: Del Cerro Dear Katie: Thank you for your prompt and courteous response! R Steip Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 7, 2021, at 8:50 AM, Katie Lozano <KatieL@rpvca.gov> wrote: > > Hello Mr. Steip, > > Thank you for your email.  Over the past several months, the City has been working closely with the four Homeowner Associations in the Del Cerro neighborhood to resolve quality of life issues for residents related to overcrowding and traffic conditions in this area.  Some of the solutions being implemented and/or explored further are additional parking enforcement, a parking reservation/fee system, and a traffic calming analysis conducted by a traffic engineering consultant.  > > On January 19, the City Council will consider an agenda item related to these potential solutions.  To participate in the meeting, please use the link below.  Thank you again for your email.  It will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item. > > https://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeting-Video-and-Agendas > > Thank you, > > Katie Lozano > Senior Administrative Analyst > Recreation, Parks, and Open Space > City of Rancho Palos Verdes > 310-544-5267 > > To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service.  Some employees are working on rotation and may be working remotely.  Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed.  For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: rhsteip [mailto:rhsteip@cox.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 3:21 PM > To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> > Subject: Del Cerro > > I am concerned about the sheer number of people and their cars on Crenshaw and Crest 7 days a week from early morning until dark.   This is a public safety issue with all the cars and COVID19 concerns with all the people and probable environmental damage to the trails and wildlife.  I have been living in the Crest area since 1988, and since COVID19, crowded rhsteip <rhsteip@cox.net> Thu 1/7/2021 9:08 AM To:Katie Lozano <KatieL@rpvca.gov>; F-19 1/11/2021 Re: Del Cerro - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/2 conditions at Del Cerro are worsening and I have not hiked there for months to avoid the crowds.  Please do something to limit the crowds and keep the area accessible and safe for Peninsula residents! > > Richard Steip, MD > > Sent from my iPhone F-20 1/11/2021 Fw: Alta Vicente and Three Sisters Trails - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/2 Fw: Alta Vicente and Three Sisters Trails Hello Ms. Ryan , Thank you for your email. And thank you for your observaons. Dogs off-leash and owners not picking up dog waste are strictly enforced by City Park Rangers, and I have forwarded these observaons to our Park Rangers for addional presence and enforcement. Specific informaon as to me of day and locaon helps us to direct enforcement. Are you able to provide info on mes of day/days of week and trail names? We will addionally take a look at the signage relaying LA County Health Order mask and social distancing direcves at these locaons to make sure they are sufficient and intact. Your email will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. To parcipate in the meeng, please use the link below. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas Thank you, Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. From: E.G. Ryan [mailto:doodlelisi@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 4:34 PM To: Parks <Parks@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Ted Shirley <tshirley333@hotmail.com> Subject: Alta Vicente and Three Sisters Trails Katie Lozano Mon 1/11/2021 1:23 PM To:doodlelisi@gmail.com <doodlelisi@gmail.com>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Parks <Parks@rpvca.gov>; F-21 1/11/2021 Fw: Alta Vicente and Three Sisters Trails - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/2 Hello RPV City Council and RPV Parks and Recreation, I walk the Alta Vicente and Three Sisters trails every day with my kids, since we live close by. Since the city has been advertising the trails as an overflow for Del Cerro, the amount of people on the trails is steadily rising. However, many people do not wear masks, and those with dogs usually do not have their dogs on a leash. Today we walked and the first four people we came across with dogs were all without masks and had their dogs off leash. The trails at Alta Vicente and Three Sisters are, in many places, less than 2 feet wide, and coming across person after person with unleashed dogs is unnerving and dangerous. Not to mention that masks are not being worn by many who pass by is nowadays even more frightening. We ran across a volunteer from the PVPLC this morning as well, and she too had confrontations with individuals and their unleashed dogs, some of whom swear at her, or tell her it is their 'right." No, there is a leash law in effect for everyone's protection. Our German Shepherd dog has never been off leash, yet every dog that runs at us risks a dog fight with our dog. I now have to send my twins 100 yards ahead to scout the narrow trails and ask owners to leash their dogs. Some do, some become aggressive, some tell us no; one even told us he had no leash. This is illegal and dangerous. I have lived here my whole life and have walked these trails my whole life- and the level of disrespect and entitlement that is taking place on the trails is absurd. Upon asking two young men to put on masks I had a misplaced comment of "white privilege" thrown in my face, along with four-letter words that I do not appreciate my little girl being exposed to. I plan to raise the issue at the next City Council meeting. Not to mention, the Alta Vicente area is home to fragile and endangered animals. and plants. The trails are turning into dog toilets, as we witness people going to the dog park, but first letting their dogs use the trails as a bathroom. Something needs to be done about this. And, unlike the wide trails at Del Cerro, and the large amount of open space there, the Alta Vicente area is smaller and not capable of absorbing the crowds that are being directed there by signs placed in the city. Please consider removing these signs and please do not consider using City Hall as a staging area from which to shuttle people to other areas to hike. If this continues, there is the risk that trails will have to be shut down again. Please let me know what you plan to do about this increasing problem. Please do not respond with a "we will look into this." I would like concrete answers before I take action and begin petitioning my whole city to take action as many of my friends who live here have the same concerns and have had the same unfortunate confrontations with inconsiderate, law-breaking individuals. Regards, Elisabeth Ryan 4 Packet Road RPV, CA 90275 310-383-8923 F-22 1/11/2021 Fw: - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/1 Fw: Hello MS. Steip, Thank you for your email. It will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. To parcipate in the meeng, please use the link below. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas Thank you, Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. -----Original Message----- From: Susan Steip [mailto:ssteip@cox.net] Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 5:03 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: I have been a RPV resident since 1988. I have been hiking DelCerro trails now for 22 years, several times a week. There sure have been a lot of parking changes over time. I remember when we could park on the narrow street right by the trailhead. Then they were painted RED and we were moved further down Crenshaw and given 10 spaces with permits for RPV residents. I have been thankful for all these spaces. There have been a lot of complaints from the neighborhood and I am hoping we as residents of RPV be allowed to stay in our latest designated spaces by DelCerro park. Thank you, Scotti Steip RPV Resident Sent from my iPhone Katie Lozano Fri 1/8/2021 10:33 AM To:ssteip@cox.net <ssteip@cox.net>; Cc:CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; F-23 1/12/2021 Fw: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=IMailComposeViewModelFactory&wid=77&ispopout=1 1/2 From: Kae Lozano Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 12:23 PM To: sullivision@cox.net Cc: CC Subject: Fw: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Hello Ms. Sullivan, Thank you for your email. It will be included as correspondence along with the January 19 City Council agenda item on Preserve parking and access. To parcipate in the meeng, please use the link below. hps://www.rpvca.gov/772/City-Meeng-Video-and-Agendas Thank you, Kae Lozano Senior Administrave Analyst Recreaon, Parks, and Open Space City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310-544-5267 To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotaon and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. From: Pay Sullivan [mailto:sullivision@cox.net] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 10:09 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve I am glad the City of RPV is addressing the parking issues regarding our nature trails which have been beaufully preserved and tended to, drawing hundreds and hundreds of visitors. I have been a long-me resident of the Peninsula and while it’s great to share our parkland, I miss the privacy that we enjoyed for so many years. Certainly, the parking on Crenshaw Blvd is concerning. There is limited space and there are no walkways to accommodate the people who are walking to and from their vehicle. The church parking for St. John Fischer is compromised, as is the security of the homes in that area. Many City and Naonal parks charge a significant entrance fee and limit the me…i.e. Point Lobos in Carmel. I’m sure you’ve considered “Sckers for Residents” for a fee as well. I’m also wondering about the parking spaces provided by the City at Abalone Cove, The Pointe Vincente Lighthouse, and others along PV Drive West. Fees and me limitaon might be the only way to keep the amount of visitors in control, Good luck with your meeng as well as the outcome. Warm Regards, Patty Sullivan F-24 1/12/2021 Fw: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=IMailComposeViewModelFactory&wid=77&ispopout=1 2/2 Vista Sotheby’s International Realty 35 Penn Center, Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 c 310.418.7906 | palosverdes-beachcities-homes.com | Cal BRE#01462636 PSullivan@VistaSIR.com | VistaSIR.com Each Office is Independently Owned and Operated. F-25 1/11/2021 Re: Del Cerro Park and Portuguese Bend Reserve PARKING - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…1/2 Re: Del Cerro Park and Portuguese Bend Reserve PARKING Super!  Thank you, Katie. Michael Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 7, 2021, at 8:27 AM, Katie Lozano <KatieL@rpvca.gov> wrote: > > Hello Mr. Torcasso, > > Thank you for your email.  It will be included as correspondence with the January 19 City Council Agenda item on Preserve access and parking.  Also, the City is in the process of hiring two parking enforcement rangers, and in additional to issuing parking citations, they will be educating the public on parking rules.  One parking enforcement ranger began employment in December, and the second will be employed this month.  We are looking forward to the improved parking compliance resulting from our new parking enforcement rangers.  > > Thank you, > > Katie Lozano > Senior Administrative Analyst > Recreation, Parks, and Open Space > City of Rancho Palos Verdes > 310-544-5267 > > To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service.  Some employees are working on rotation and may be working remotely.  Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed.  For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Torcasso [mailto:michaeltorcasso@icloud.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 7:45 PM > To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> > Subject: Del Cerro Park and Portuguese Bend Reserve PARKING > > As a resident of RPV, and a frequent user of the trails in the Portuguese Bend Reserve area, I would like to ask the City Counsel to continue to restrict parking inside of Del Cerro Park to residents only displaying the appropriate RFP windshield sticker! Issuing these stickers to provide preferential parking for residents was a brilliant idea that should be continued. > > I consider the Park - and especially the Reserve area Trails - as part of my home. Many residents will be quite upset if we lose easy access to parking. With that said, I am concerned at the limited number of spaces that are reserved for residents. It is important to have a Park or Reserve Ranger posted at the parking spaces on weekends and holidays to stop non-residents from using the spaces. This is a preferred approach to simply ticketing the cars but not removing them. > > Thank you very much! > Michael Torcasso <michaeltorcasso@icloud.com> Thu 1/7/2021 7:30 PM To:Katie Lozano <KatieL@rpvca.gov>; F-26 1/11/2021 Re: Del Cerro Park and Portuguese Bend Reserve PARKING - Katie Lozano https://owa.rpvca.gov/owa/#viewmodel=ReadMessageItem&ItemID=AAMkADVlMWI0ZTUxLTE3YTktNGI5Mi04MjcxLWI0ZWVjZjE0ODY4MABGAAAA…2/2 > Michael Torcasso > 26615 Honey Creek Road > RPV > > > > F-27