20210601 Late CorrespondenceEnyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Late late corr
Teresa Takaoka
Wednesday, June 2, 2021 11 :54 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Ladera Linda
From: Stuart Friedland <stuart_friedland@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 8:08 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Ladera Linda
Dear City Council:
I hope it is not too late to talk you out of spending mega millions for the Ladera Linda
re-development.
Have you checked the area comps? You could buy at least two and half of the most
luxurious properties available here on the peninsula for that money, and triple the
finished square footage.
So I would deem this particular land development a certifiable boondoggle.
And, am I mistaken, or don't a significant number of the City Council want a new City
Hall? Who going to pay for that, and deplete our reserves?
Please each of you, reconsider this over the top spending, and spend money as if it was
coming out of your own pocket.
Sincerely,
Stuart Friedland
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Wednesday, June 2, 2021 11 :56 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peafowl
From: Sil Orlando <silorlando@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:30 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl
Yes they are loud and messy sometimes but they are part of nature and they were here before all of us. They deserve to
be here. Everyone who moved I knew before they moved that they bought a home in a Peafkul area. Leave them be. Do
make them like the Indians, African Americans, Asians, gays and others who we have wronged.
Sil Orlando
Golden Meadow Dr.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Theresa Laura <tlaura@ucla.edu >
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:41 PM
CityClerk
Peafowl Trapping
Mr. Mayor and Members of the RPV City Council,
As a long time RPV resident, I am writing in support of pausing the Peafowl trapping program. I am opposed to the
trapping of Peafowl. The Peafowl add a unique charm to our community, and have come to be a symbol of the
Peninsula.
Sincerely,
Theresa Laura
1
l.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Late late corr
Teresa Takaoka
Wednesday, June 2, 2021 11 :54 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peacocks in RPV
From: Donna Singleton <singletondrm@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 9:12 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacocks in RPV
Where are they generally located?
Wish to view and take photos.
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Wednesday, June 2, 2021 11:55 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peacock entrapment
From: Stuart Friedland <stuart_friedland@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 6:02 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacock entrapment
Dear City Council:
Please support the staff recommendation and do not trap peafowl again this year.
Thank you,
Stuart Friedland
1
7.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
From: Rosie <rosie6@cox.net>
Teresa Takaoka
Wednesday, June 2, 2021 11 :55 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peacock Trapping
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:34 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacock Trapping
Please stop the peacock trappings for this year. I hope we can have them around in my Pt. Vicenti neighborhood again.
They disappeared over two decades ago and never returned. They are so lovely.
Rosie Bachman
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Teresa Takaoka
Wednesday, June 2, 2021 11 :56 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: No on peafowl trapping
From: Kimberlae Takayanagi <tallwillow@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:33 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: No on peafowl trapping
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Dear Council Members:
I am thankful that you made the unanimous decision to cease trapping of peafowl for last year. Please vote against
trapping and removing the beautiful creatures again this year.
I attached the letter I wrote last year. I don't think we have yet answered the question I asked there. Do we know for
certain trapping and relocation is a humane process? What is the one year survival rate? Can we have new home
buyers sign an acknowledgement that peafowl are co-residents of the neighborhood?
Thank you For your Compassion and understanding.
Kim Takayanagi
6601 El Rodeo Road
Rancho Palos Verdes
Sent from my iPhone
1
7.
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
TO:
FROM:
HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
CITY CLERK
DATE: JUNE 1, 2021
SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA
Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material presented
for tonight's meeting.
Item No. Description of Material
Public Comment Written Correspondence from: Olivia Verrett
Emails from: Jan & Herb Raymond; Melanie Streitfeld; Diane Volpicelli;
G Update on attachment A
Email from: Noel Park
1 Email from Kerry Renn
5 Emails from: Herb Stark; Nicole Lauro; Iris Himelwright; Matt Stanovich;
Donald Bell
6 Email exchange between Administrative Analyst Bright and Sharon
Yarber
7 Email exchange between Code Enforcer Monroy and Carol Mueller;
Natalie Massey
Emails from: Gail Taylor; Joe & Beatrice Marino; Marianne Hunter;
Walter Rosskopf; Jan & Herb Raymond; Lisa Green; Yvonne & Tony
Schreiner; Aru Tamhane; Dr. Econom; Melanie Streitfeld; Corinne
Cortes; Valerie Berg; Denise Vroom; Diane Volpicelli; Khoi Le; Yoli
Rosiak; Merry An Sybilrud; Ken & Susan Gates; Marcia Luce; Chris
Engen; Michael Diehl; Tracy Georgis; Susan Anderson; Amber
Newsom; Sunshine; Kathy Snell; Laurie O' Brien; Steve King; Terry &
Joanne Gladfelter; Dottie Hashizumi; Rhoanne Washington; Elizabeth
Sala; Marianne Hunter; Mr. Jordan
1 O Email exchange between Senior Administrative Analyst and John R.
Jensen
Page 2
Emails from: Yvetta Williams; Joan Barry; Bob Cash; Patricia Parker;
Crystal Reul-Chen; Jean Longacre; Johanna Corbett; Diane Robinson;
Larry Maizlish; Diana Ryan McIntyre; Willis Binnard
Respectfully submitted, cJu,vtt,/lt~j
Teresa Takaoka
L:\LATE CORRESPONDENCE\202112021 Coversheets\20210601 additions revisions to agenda.docx
L:\LATE CORRESPONDENCE\2021\2021 Coversheets\20210601 additions revisions to agenda.docx
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Good morning,
McKenzie Bright
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 9:46 AM
CityClerk
olivia olivia
Late Corr -Non-Agenda: Coyotes
Ms. Olivia Verrett would like to submit the following statement as written correspondence for non-agenda items,
pertaining to coyotes:
"My name is Olivia Verrett and I'm a resident of Rancho Palos Verdes. I posted in Nextdoor, a community media, a
statement titled "Coyote Attack" because on Wednesday May 19th our pet poodle was attacked and killed by a coyote.
have received hundreds of emails not to mention the many responses on Nextdoor. This attack took place in our
backyard. My granddaughter observed a coyote close to our backdoor. Layla, our pet poodle is gone, likely dead. We
feel that our other dog in the yard was at risk of being killed or eaten because she was close to the coyote. We want to
alert our neighbors about what has happen. We will not let this matter rest until our politicians bring to us a happy
resolve."
This comment was originally submitted for the Public Safety Town Hall held on May 27; Ms. Verret requested that her
statement be included for the June 1 City Council meeting.
Thank you,
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright
Administrative Analyst
mbright@rpvca.gov
Phone -(310) 544-5305
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Website: www.rpvca.gov
► ~T!TON Goog!ePlay
I his e-mail message contains information belon9in(1 to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privilc9ocl, confidential and/or protected from
disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named, Unauthorized diss<miination, disl:ribu\ion, or copyinq is strictly prohibited. If
you received this email in error, or arc not an intended recipient, plc<1so notify the scm1cr immediately, Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID-19, visitors are required
to wear face coverings and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. Some employees are working on rotation and may
be working remotely. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the appropriate
department and follow all posted directions during your visit. Walk-ups are limited to one person at a time. Please note
that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on
the City website.
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Bafia/es
Deputy City Manager
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5203
kba na les@rpvca.gov
Karina Banales
Saturday, May 29, 2021 9:09 AM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
Fwd: Peafowl and Coyotes
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services
are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotation and may
be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone
numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Janice Raymond <janraymond1970@gmail.com>
Date: May 29, 2021 at 2:35:34 AM PDT
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl and Coyotes
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Please do not trap the peafowl. They are a wonderful nature addition to Palos Verdes. Coyotes are the
animals that need to be trapped as they are killing our pets in their own back yards. Please put your
efforts into controlling the coyote population, not the peafowl.
Jan and Herb Raymond
6741 Manero Dr
Sent from my iPad
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Karina Banales
Monday, May 31, 2021 9:52 PM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Please Suspend the Peafowl Trapping this Year
From: Melanie Streitfeld <streitfeld@cox.net>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 9:52 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Please Suspend the Peafowl Trapping this Year
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Dear Council members,
Please suspend the trapping of the peafowl program for at least this year. All the birds have been trapped except for one
in my neighborhood. I hear from so many people on the hill asking what has happened to all the peafowl. The peafowl
were here long before any of the current residents.
I would much rather see the coyotes being trapped as I cannot bear to read another heartbreaking story on
Nextdoor.com about someone's pet being snatched away while their owners were not able to stop it. So many cases of
owners being a few feet away and the coyotes not being afraid of humans and grabbing pets.
Thank you.
Melanie Streitfeld
5330 Middlecrest Rd
RPV
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Origina I Message-----
Karina Banales
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:37 AM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Trapping of any more peacocks ...
From: Diane Volpicelli <volpsntanman@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202112:14 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Re: Trapping of any more peacocks ...
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Hello,
I wanted to make my voice heard about concern over continuing of the trapping of the peacocks in PV. I feel you are
taking away a beautiful piece of the Peninsula's history by trying to rid the hill of these gorgeous glorious birds! I was
born and raised here and for all my time growing up here peacocks 9 were just naturally apart of the picturesque
beauty of PV! These birds are dwindling in numbers. Please don't take them from where they belong and have always
known as their home! Please! So much of the hill is getting squeezed out and becoming too overcrowded and
opinionated now more than ever. From the peacocks, to the over population and out of control more daring coyotes
and the wild barn cats . So much is trying to be changed, restrained and confined for all these new neighborhoods and
the new money coming into this area. I realize some things are inevitable, but could we at least take the peacock
trapping off the table to preserve at least some of Palos Verdes unique charm of years gone by. Please!
Thank you so much!
Diane Volpicelli
Sent from Diane's iPhone
1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104O51798
CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT
By and Between
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
and
KOA CORPORATION
0!203.0006/719158.l EQG 1
G.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND
KOA CORPORATION
THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein "Agreement") is made and
entered into on June 1, 2020, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a
California municipal corporation ("City") and KOA CORPORATION, a California corporation
("Consultant"). City and Consultant may be referred to, individually or collectively, as "Party" or
"Parties."
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals, the performance of the
services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.
B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal for the performance of the
services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the
City to perform those services.
C. Pursuant to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, City has authority
to enter into and execute this Agreement.
D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of
those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that
the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by
the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSUL TANT
1.1 Scope of Services.
In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall
provide those services specified in the "Scope of Services", as stated in the Proposal, attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein
as the "services" or "work" hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this
Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and
facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough,
competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services
contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its
ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it
shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required
hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose
0!203.0006/719158. J EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase "highest professional standards" shall mean
those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work
under similar circumstances.
1.2 Consultant's Proposal.
The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant's Proposal which shall be incorporated
herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency
between the terms of such Proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall
govern.
1.3 Compliance with Law.
Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder
in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and
any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is
rendered.
1.4 California Labor Law.
If the Scope of Services includes any "public work" or "maintenance work," as those
terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1 720 et seq. and California Code of
Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more,
Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in
California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws,
including the following requirements:
(a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that some or all of the work to be
performed under this Agreement is a "public work" as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and
that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1
(commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts
and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR")
implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance
monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by
regulation.
(b) Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent
required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the
prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any
interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Consultant
acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Department oflndustrial Relations (DIR) determination of
the prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post a copy of the same at each job
site where work is performed under this Agreement.
( c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall comply with
and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment
of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B 1 04051798
Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar
day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the
DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to
this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.
(d) Payroll Records. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the
provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subconsultant to:
keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as
specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as
provided by Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records.
(e) Apprentices. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions
of Labor Code Sections 1777 .5, 1777 .6, and 1777. 7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8,
Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects.
Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all
apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall
provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program.
Within sixty (60) days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of
its subconsultants shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice
hours performed under this Agreement.
(f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Consultant acknowledges that eight (8) hours labor
constitutes a legal day's work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code
Section 1810.
(g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by
the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess
hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each
worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any
subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work
more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty ( 40) hours in any one calendar week
in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of
eight (8) hours per day, and forty (40) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public
work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than one
and one-half (1 ½) times the basic rate of pay.
(h) Workers' Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700
provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its
employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code
Section 1861, Consultant certifies as follows:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require
every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to
undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will
comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of
this contract."
01203.0006/719158. l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: AOAF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
r-;AD4 r7rs
Consultant's Authorized Initial~ k.__ __
(i) Consultant's Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor
who will perform work under this Agreement, Consultant shall be responsible for such
subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720)
of the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract
with any subcontractor for work under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to take all
actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance,
including without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the
subcontractor on a periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to
pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take
corrective action to halt or rectify any such failure by any subcontractor.
1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.
Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals
as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement.
Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus
applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary
for the Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any
such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City
hereunder.
1.6 Familiarity with Work.
By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly
investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered
how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and
restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve
work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or
will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services
hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will
materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform
the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's risk until written instructions
are received from the Contract Officer in the form of a Change Order.
1.7 Care of Work.
The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to
furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents,
plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be
responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City,
except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence.
012030006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: AOAF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties.
Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective
obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all
instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry
out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible
for the service of the other.
1.9 Additional Services.
City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without
invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services
or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be
undertaken unless a written Change Order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant,
incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra
work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the
written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to fifteen percent (15%)
of the Contract Sum; or, in the time to perform of up to ninety (90) days, may be approved by the
Contract Officer through a written Change Order. Any greater increases, taken either separately
or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant
that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of
Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided
pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant
anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City
may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims
for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures
established in this Section are followed.
If in the performance of the contract scope, the Consultant becomes aware of material defects in
the scope, duration or span of the contract or the Consultant becomes aware of extenuating
circumstance that will or could prevent the completion of the contract, on time or on budget, the
Consultant shall inform the Contracting Officer of an anticipated Change Order. This proposed
change order will stipulate, the facts surrounding the issue, proposed solutions, proposed costs
and proposed schedule impacts.
1.10 Special Requirements.
Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof
are set forth in the "Special Requirements" attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated
herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit "B" and any
other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit "B" shall govern.
0!203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AFBBA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
2.1 Contract Sum.
Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the
amounts specified in the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and
incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for
actual expenses, shall not exceed $89,636 (Eighty Nine Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Six
Dollars) (the "Contract Sum"), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section
1.9.
2.2 Method of Compensation.
The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii)
payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services; (iii)
payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant's rates as specified in the Schedule of
Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks,
and (b) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the
Schedule of Compensation.
2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.
Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for
reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in
advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5,
and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the
attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City.
Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If
Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant
shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.
2.4 Invoices.
Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice, using the City template,
or in a format acceptable to the City, for all work performed and expenses incurred during the
preceding month in a form approved by City's Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for
payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the
Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the
following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-
contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant
shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.
City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine
whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this
Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant
which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause
Consultant to be paid within 45 (forty five) days of receipt of Consultant's correct and
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run
procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the
event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City
to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice
provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided
herein or any applicable law.
2.5 Waiver.
Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be
deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.
ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
3.1 Time of Essence.
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
3.2 Schedule of Performance.
Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a
written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in
the "Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by this
reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the
Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer through a Change
Order, but not exceeding ninety (90) days cumulatively.
3.3 Force Maieure.
The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the
services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to
unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant,
including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather,
fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes,
wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant
shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in
writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of
delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when
and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer's
determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall
Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of
this Agreement, however caused, Consultant's sole remedy being extension of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section.
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AFBBA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
3.4 Term.
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding 1 year
from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit
"D"). The City may, in its discretion, extend the Term by 1 additional 1-year terms.
ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK
4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.
The following principals of Consultant ("Principals") are hereby designated as being the
principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the
work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
Stephen Bise
(Name)
Principal-in-Charge
(Title)
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the
foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.
Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for
directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the
services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be
under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the
foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced
by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize
only the personnel included in the Proposal to perform services pursuant to this Agreement.
Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of
Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this
Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant's staff and subcontractors,
if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any
such performance. City shall have the right to approve or reject any proposed replacement
personnel, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
4.2 Status of Consultant.
Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation,
debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless
such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in
writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or
any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers,
employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant's officers, employees or
agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may
otherwise accrue to City's employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may
have to any such rights.
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104O51798
4.3 Contract Officer.
The Contract Officer shall be the City Engineer, or such person as may be designated by
the Public Works Director. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to assure that the Contract
Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant
shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise
specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract
Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to
sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this
Agreement.
4.4 Independent Consultant.
Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode
or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein,
except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge,
supervision or control of Consultant's employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing
their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required
herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly
independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are
agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed
to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any
joint enterprise with Consultant.
4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.
The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and
employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore,
Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services
required hereunder without the express written approval of the City; all subcontractors included
in the Proposal are deemed approved. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein
may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation
of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of
City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons
acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control
of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such
unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No
approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability
hereunder without the express consent of City.
ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
5.1 Insurance Coverages.
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of
any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts
described below and in a form satisfactory to City.
(a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general
liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01,
in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily
injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that
has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO "insured contract" language
will not be accepted.
(b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile
insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury
and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with
Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-
owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each
accident.
(c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall
maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection
with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any
policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this
Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than
three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.
(d) Workers' compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers'
Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer's Liability Insurance (with limits of at
least $1,000,000).
(e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds
under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated
herein.
(t) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required
in the Special Requirements in Exhibit "B".
5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to
City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation
endorsement for workers' compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be
approved by City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification
of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any
time.
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
(b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder
by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
( c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be
primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required
to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination
of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or
be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-
contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City's own insurance or self-insurance shall
be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
(d) City's rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required
under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced,
City has the right but not the duty to obtain and continuously maintain the insurance it deems
necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will
withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City
may cancel this Agreement.
( e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance
company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance
or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an
assigned policyholders' Rating of A-(or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger)
in accordance with the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by
the City's Risk Manager.
(f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured
pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or
appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow
Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to
waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery
against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of
its subconsultants.
(g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant
acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform
Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the
City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
(h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or
limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other
requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific
reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given
issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other
coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums
shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained
012010006/719158.1 EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: AOAF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits
of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
(i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or
broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation ( except for
nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each
required coverage.
G) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be
endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers
shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any
excess/umbrella liability policies.
(k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages
required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting
endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing.
(1) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for
all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer's limits of
liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
(m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants,
subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in
the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements
required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes
all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements
of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants,
subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review.
(n) Agency's right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any
time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by
giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change
results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate
Consultant's compensation.
( o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to
and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated,
lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these
specifications unless approved by City.
(p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely
notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant's performance
under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required
liability policies.
012010006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
( q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its
own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be
necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
5.3 Indemnification.
To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") against, and will
hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial,
administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs,
penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein "claims
or liabilities") that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in
connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein
of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or
entity for which Consultant is legally liable ("indemnitors"), or arising from Consultant's or
indemnitors' reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant's or indemnitors'
negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this
Agreement, and in connection therewith:
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any
of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and
attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its
officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection
with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of
Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and
employees harmless therefrom;
(c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to
any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims
arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work,
operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers,
agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or
employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys'
fees.
Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if
it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and
failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This
indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or
omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional
services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring
as a result of City's sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent
permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City's negligence,
except that design professionals' indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities
arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: AOAF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive
termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION
6.1 Records.
Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of
accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the
disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the "books and records"), as
shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract
Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete
and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all
times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make
records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three
(3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such
records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant's business,
custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by
Consultant's successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully
cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is
made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records
Act.
6.2 Reports.
Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports
concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer
shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost
of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant
agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that
may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein
or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant
shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the
estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design
services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.
6.3 Ownership of Documents.
All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes,
computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the "documents and materials")
prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this
Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the
Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim
for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full
rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any
use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104O51798
uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the
City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant's guarantee and warranties
shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such
documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein.
All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared
by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify
City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents
and materials that may qualify as "works made for hire" as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such
documents and materials are hereby deemed "works made for hire" for the City.
6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in
performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the
public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such
information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written
authorization from the Contract Officer.
(b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not,
without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City
Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at
depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed
under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary"
provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of
Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City
shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and
fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant's conduct.
( d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work
performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be
present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully
with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests
provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean
the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION
7.1 California Law.
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to
performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions
concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be
01203.0006/719158.1 EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: AOAF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104O51798
instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other
appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal
jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District
Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los
Angeles, State of California.
7.2 Disputes; Default.
In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall
not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed
after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the
reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the
default. This timeframe is fifteen (15) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if
circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold
all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the
alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding
invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take
necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City
to give notice of the Consultant's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City's
legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
7.3 Retention of Funds.
Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant
(whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in
dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or
damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by
reason of Consultant's acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant's
obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount
or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear
to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for
interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of
City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of
the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.
7.4 Waiver.
Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any
party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other
provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.
Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of
the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by
a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a
waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of
any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this
Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party
of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or
different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the
other party.
7.6 Legal Action.
In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in
equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel
specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain
any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary
provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections
905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.
7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.
This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided
in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this
Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant,
except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be
such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. Upon receipt of any notice of
termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be
specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for
all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services
authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation
or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the
event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the City need not provide the
Consultant with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.
7.8 Termination for Default of Party.
If termination is due to the failure of the other Party to fulfill its obligations under this
Agreement:
(a) City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work
and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable
to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the
compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate
such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off
or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.
(b) Consultant may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, terminate the
Agreement upon written notice to the City's Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to
payment for all work performed up to the date of termination.
01203.0006/719158. l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
7.9 Attorneys' Fees.
If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any
action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such
action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or
equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. Attorney's fees shall include attorney's
fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney's fees shall be entitled to all other
reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other
necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be
deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or
not such action is prosecuted to judgment.
ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION
8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.
No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any
successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which
may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the
terms of this Agreement.
8.2 Conflict of Interest.
Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall
acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests
of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant's performance of services under this
Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person
having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor
without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times
avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City
in the performance of this Agreement.
No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in
this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the
Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation,
partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any
State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay
or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.
Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons
claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of,
any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual
orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of
this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed
and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed,
01203.0006/719158.I EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AFBBA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other
protected class.
8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.
Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection
therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ
such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this
Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of
unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such
liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees,
incurred by City.
ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
9.1 Notices.
Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either
party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and
either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City
Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of
Rancho Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 and in
the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of
this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of
address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in
seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.
9.2 Interpretation.
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the
language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship
of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
9.3 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.
9.4 Integration; Amendment.
This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive
expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements
between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels
any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between
the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification
of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by
012030006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be
waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
9.5 Severability.
In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or
sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid
judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall
not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this
Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent
of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives
either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.
9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.
No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in
this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision
relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of
any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or
in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly
interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of
"financial interest" shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be
"remote" or "noninterests" pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant
warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party
including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration,
or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement.
Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s),
omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money,
consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City
official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any
agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other
conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render
this Agreement void and of no force or effect. ~:4 (7°5
Consultant's Authorized Initial~~
9.7 Corporate Authority.
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such
party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this
Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally
bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not
violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall
be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
01203.0006/719158.1 EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the date and year first-above written.
ATTEST:
Teresa Takaoka, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
William W. Wynder, City Attorney
CITY:
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a
municipal corporation
Eric Alegria, Mayor
CONSULTANT:
KOA CORPORATION, a California corporation
By[Ati:"~
Na . MW~titt
Title: President/Chief Executive Officer r?ocuS/~:
By:b / J-,
Name: Yu'fffft8iu4tf~rrez
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Address: 2141 W. Orangewood, Orange, CA 92868
Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required
from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2)
Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT'S
SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE
INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR
OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT'S BUSINESS ENTITY.
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On , 2021 before me, _______ , personally appeared _______ , proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person( s) whose names( s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: _______________ _
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
0 INDIVIDUAL
0 CORPORATE OFFICER
□ □ □ □ □ □
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) 0 LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER __________ _
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
DocuSign Envelope ID: AOAF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On ____ , 2021 before me, _______ , personally appeared------~ proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person( s) whose names( s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature( s) on the instrument the person( s ), or the entity upon behalf of which the person( s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: _______________ _
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
0 INDIVIDUAL
0 CORPORA TE OFFICER
□ □ □ □ □ □
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) 0 LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER -------------
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
01203.0006/719158.l EQG
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-19B104D51798
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
01203.0006/695867. l EQG A-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 IF· 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARI< ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO ~A
May 27, 2021
Sean Lopez
Assistant Engineer
City of Rancho Palos Verdes I Public Works Department
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Subject: Proposal for Traffic Calming Plans for the Pacific View Neighborhood, Hawthorne
Boulevard between Palos Verdes Drive W. and Verde Ridge Road,
Hawthorne/Ravenspur, Avenida Classica, Fond Du Lac Road and La Rotonda Drive
Dear Mr. Lopez :
Thank you for meeting with KOA Corporation (KOA) to discuss the scope of work for developing traffic
calming plans for the subject locations throughout the City. Please review our scope of work provided
below to perform the required services for this Project, as well as the following revised fee estimate . Let
us know if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter proposal.
Project Understand i ng and KOA Approach
Our proposed approach involves analyzing the existing conditions and collecting data; developing
industry-proven traffic calming countermeasures to address the issues; and working with residents,
citizens and the City's Traffic Safety Committee to ensure that these solutions are supported by the
community at-large and fit the local context of Rancho Palos Verdes . In addition to conducting on-site
field walks, measurements and observations, we will collect speed data and traffic volume counts as a
baseline measure in order to justify our ideas and recommendations .
Studies to incorporate into the Plan include collision analyses, sight distance studies, ball-bank analyses
for curvature speed recommendations, and various "warrant" analyses to determine the appropriateness
of certain traffic control devices and traffic calming elements. Ultimately, a set of traffic calming plans will
be developed and vetted through multiple outreach meetings with local stakeholders and the Traffic
Safety Committee (TSC) for final City Council approval. The traffic calming plans will be prepared for the
following locations:
• Hawthorne Boulevard between Palos Verdes Drive West and Verde Ridge Road
• The Pacific View Neighborhood -Verde Ridge Road and Locklenna Lane
• Hawthorne Boulevard at Ravenspur Drive (West/East)
• Avenida Classica between Crest Road and Los Verdes Drive;
• Fond Du Lac Road between Basswood Avenue and Littlebrow Road; and
• La Rotonda Drive between Palos Verdes Drive South and its southwesterly terminus
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 1
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T. 714.573.0317 I F 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARJ< ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
SCOPE OF WORK
~A
KOA proposes to complete the project within the 6-month schedule anticipated in the RFP. The flow chart
below depicts the rough sequence of events and activities to be completed from month to month for
each of the six (6) traffic calming plan projects:
Proposed 6-month Flow Chart and Milestones for Traffic Calm i ng Plans
Month 1
• Kick-off meeting
• Set goals, roles & milestones
• 1st stakeholder outreach and
awareness meetings (6)
Month 4
• Develop Draft Traffic Calming
Plans (6 DTCPs)
• Present DTCPs to Traffic Safety
Committee (TSC)
Month 2
• Begin Plan development
• Review/collect data
• Identify & analyze ex. issues
• Choose traffic calming tools
Month 5
• Refine Plans ; Prepare Draft
Final Traffic Calming Plans
(6 DFTCPs) based on TSC input
• Present DFTCPs to TSC
Month 3
• 2nd stakeholder outreach
meetings to gather feedba ck (6)
• Fire /Police/Maint coordination
• Refine strategies from input
Month 6
• Present DFTCPs to City Council
w/ TSC endorsement letter
• Prepare Final Traffic Calming
Plans (6 FTCPs) per Council input
TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN 1 -PACIFIC VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD
BACl<GROUND
The City has identified the need to study
reported traffic safety concerns on
Verde Ridge Road and Locklenna Lane
in the Pacific View community. Verde
Ridge Road and Locklenna Lane are
each 40-foot wide , two-lane undivided
(local) residential streets with on -street
parking allowed on both sides . Verde
,•IOOd D
Ridge Road is abutted by residential ,_______ ind
properties from Hawthorne Boulevard
to its westerly terminus at 3,300' to the west. Locklenna Lane is single-loaded with residential properties
running alongside only the south side of the street, and Hesse Community Park on the north side of the
street. Both streets are stop-controlled on their easterly terminus at Hawthorne Boulevard, with no
intermittent traffic controls along their length. KOA will collect and analyze traffic, roadway and roadside
data for each of these segments, collect input from adjacent residents and stakeholders, identify the
prevailing speeding and safety concerns , then develop a traffic calming plan to address the issues.
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Pa los Verdes
Page 2
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104O51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573 0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TASK 1A.1 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
Task Summary
• Task 1A.1 -Project Coordination and Administration
• Task 1A.2 -Project Meetings
Kick -off meeting
K~A
Upon authorization to proceed, KOA will coordinate with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to set up a kick-
off meeting . The purpose of the initial conversation will be to finalize the project timeline, set up an
internal meeting schedule and agree upon the project communication channels . This meeting will also be
the first step in formalizing the parameters of the project, outlining project opportunities and challenges,
and addressing participant-specific project expectations moving forward, including stakeholder
engagement.
Additional goals of the kick-off meeting will be to:
• Review and discuss project overview;
• Confirm project schedule and details for reoccurring meetings;
• Establish compliance standards and guidelines (e.g., RPV Engineering Standards, Neighborhood
Traffic Calming Program, industry standards and best practices)
• Distribute a list of data/document needs for the project; and
• Establish staff communication, project management process, and roles
As part of the kick-off meeting, we will facilitate with the City a plan for stakeholder analysis discussions to
clarify our public outreach mission, identify key stakeholders for each Traffic Calming Plan, and the
appropriate level of engagement, timing of activities to ensure congruency with our technical milestones,
and key messages, goals and objectives to maintain throughout the project.
Stakeholder Meetings
KOA will coordinate with the City to provide outreach and solicit input from community stakeholders,
including private residents, the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) and City Council. The proposed sequence
of stakeholder meetings is as follows:
Anticipated Meeting Schedule:
• Informal meeting with community members and residents to discuss the subject traffic safety
issues
• Follow-up meetings with community members and residents to discuss potential solutions and
options
• Meeting with the TSC to present the Draft Traffic Calming Plans (DTCP)
• Follow-up meeting with the TSC to present the revised DTCP (i.e., Final Draft Traffic Calming
Plans)
• City Council Meeting with Letter of Endorsement from TSC to present the FDTCP
• Optional -Follow-up meeting with City Council to present the Final Traffic Calming Plan, based
on any final/previous City Council and/or public comments
KOA will prepare agenda, project schedule, and other meeting materials and distribute them ahead of all
meetings. In addition, post-meeting, we will prepare meeting minutes including discussion and action
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 3
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T· 714.573.0317 I F 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO KeA
items. Meeting minutes and a copy of meeting materials will be distributed to attendees within five (5)
business days after the meeting .
Task 1 A Deliverables
• Meeting Agenda
• Presentation Materials
• Meeting Minutes
• Response(s) to Post -Meeting RFls
TASK 2A-DATA COLLECTION
Task Summary:
• Task 2A.1 -8-Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts (TMCs)
• Task 2A .2 -Collect/Compile Existing Documents and Collision Data
• Task 2A.3 -Conduct On-Site Field Observations and Measurements
The first step in the data collection process is to obtain traffic data to verify the existing conditions. The
City has indicated that recent traffic volume and speed count data for Verde Ridge Road and Locklenna
Lane are available and will be provided to KOA. In the event that newer data is required, 48-hour speed
counts and/or 24-hour ADT volume counts will be conducted on each segment for an additional fee as
optional service . Two (2) 8-hour intersection turning movement traffic volume counts will be conducted at
the intersections of Verde Ridge Road & Locklenna Lane, and Verde Ridge Road & El Rodeo Road, for use
in conducting the subsequent multi-way stop control warrant assessment. KOA will also perform in-field
observations along each street to understand the prevailing traffic concerns . A summary of the field data
count information KOA proposes to collect is listed as follows :
Proposed Field Data Collection :
• 8-Hour Intersection Turning Movement counts -2 locations, for multi-way stop sign warrant
• On-site field inspections (sight distance, visual observations)
KOA will also compile any available traffic collision data from the City for Verde Ridge Road and Locklenna
Lane .
Task 2A Deliverables
• Field Reconnaissance Notes, Photo Logs and Observation Summaries
TASK 3A-ANALYZE AND IDENTIFY ISSUES
Task Summary:
• Task 3A.1 -Stop Sign Warrant Analyses
• Task 3A.2 -Collision Analyses
• Task 3A.3 -Sight Distance Analyses
RAI\ICHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1 des
Page 4
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F· 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DI EGO K~A
KOA will analyze the collected data and other researched information about the subject project locations
and report on the relevant findings. This will include reporting on the existing roadway, roadside and
traffic conditions observed in the field; existing traffic control devices; collision patterns; the relative traffic
speeds on each segment; prevailing traffic volume flows; observed deficiencies and issues; identification
of sight distance concerns; and the results of the stop sign warrant analyses.
Task 3A Deliverables
• Su mmary of Traffic Safety Issues and Warrant Analyses
• Co ll ision Diagrams
• Sight Dista nce Diagrams
TASK 4A-DEVELOP TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES AND OPTIONS
Task Summary:
• Task 4A.1 -Speeding Mitigation Plan
• Task 4A.2 -Traffic Control Device Upgrades
• Task 4A.3 -Other Traffic Calming Countermeasures
• Task 4A.4 -Coordination with RPV Police and Fire/LACFD
• Task 4A.5 -Rough Quantities and Cost Estimates
KOA will develop a range of traffic calming strategies and options to serve as a "toolbox" of potential
strategies to address the local contexts of each roadway and traffic safety issue. Traffic calming strategies
will be developed in accordance with national and industry practice, and comply with the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes standards, as well as State and Federal requirements. Traffic calming strategies and options
will be developed on the basis of low-cost/short-term, intermediate-cost/medium -term, and full-
cost/long-term priorities and schedules. KOA will prepare a summary of recommendations and options to
present to the City and stakeholders, and develop rough engineering quantities and estimates to reflect
the required funding to implement the preferred countermeasures developed in each Traffic Calming
Plan .
Task 4A Deliverables
• Summary of Recommendations
• Turning Templates for Emergency Serv ices Veh icles (as requ ired)
• Conceptual Enginee r ing Cost Est i mates
TASK SA -COMPILE DRAFT TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS (DTCP)
Task Su m mary:
• Task SA.1 -Pacific View Neighborhood Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP)
The Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP) will be a synthesis of all project outreach, data collection, analysis,
findings and recommendations produced in Tasks 1 through 4. The DTCP will include concept exhibits of
the preferred traffic calming alternatives, including construction standard references and rough order-of-
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -D[VELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFrlC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1·des
Page 5
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T. 714 573.0317 I F· 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PAR I< ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO K~A
magnitude cost estimates. The DTCP will be presented to the Traffic Safety Committee following the
community/private resident outreach.
Task SA Deliverables
• Draft Traff ic Calming Plan (DTCP)
TASI< GA-PREPARE DRAFT FINAL & FINAL TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN (DFTCP & FTCP)
Task Summary:
• Task 6A.1 -Pacific View Neighborhood Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
KOA will revise the DTCP and present the traffic calming plan as a Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
for City Council review. Any additional comments and/or public feedback obtained from the City Council
meeting will be incorporated into a Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP) for final City Council approval.
Task GA Deliverables
• Draft Final (DFTCP) & Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP)
TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN 2 -HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD
BACKGROUND
The City has identified the need to
study reported traffic safety
concerns on Hawthorne
Boulevard, particularly in the
southbound/westbound direction,
between Verde Ridge Road and
Palos Verdes Drive West.
Hawthorne Boulevard is an 8-foot
wide, four-lane roadway with a
raised median along most of its
length, and serves as a key arterial
in the City. The roadway is further
characterized by median
breaks/turn pockets at
intersections, Class II (on -street
striped) bike lanes, and a steep
grade to the south which slopes
l·,11;.
downward continuously along the 2.71-mile length between Verde Ridge Road and Palos Verdes Drive
West. There are also a total of four (4) signalized intersections within the study area , located on
Hawthorne Boulevard at Crest Road , Dupre Drive, Vallon Drive , and Palos Verdes Drive West. KOA will
collect and analyze traffic, roadway and roadside data for the total length of the Hawthorne Boulevard
study segments, collect input from adjacent residents and stakeholders, identify the prevailing speeding
and safety concerns, then develop a traffic calming plan to address the issues .
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1 ·des
Page 6
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714 .573.0317 I F· 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TASI< 1B.1 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
Task Summary
• Task 1 B.1 -Project Coordination and Administration
• Task 1 B.2 -Project Meetings
Kick-off meeting
K~A
Upon authorization to proceed, KOA will coordinate with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to set up a kick-
off meeting. The purpose of the initial conversation will be to finalize the project timeline, set up an
internal meeting schedule and agree upon the project communication channels. This meeting will also be
the first step in formalizing the parameters of the project, outlining project opportunities and challenges,
and addressing participant-specific project expectations moving forward, including stakeholder
engagement.
Additional goals of the kick-off meeting will be to:
• Review and discuss project overview;
• Confirm project schedule and details for reoccurring meetings;
• Establish compliance standards and guidelines (e .g., RPV Engineering Standards, Neighborhood
Traffic Calming Program, industry standards and best practices)
• Distribute a list of data/document needs for the project; and
• Establish staff communication, project management process, and roles
As part of the kick -off meeting, we will facilitate with the City a plan for stakeholder analysis discussions to
clarify our public outreach mission, identify key stakeholders for each Traffic Calming Plan, and the
appropriate level of engagement, timing of activities to ensure congruency with our technical milestones,
and key messages, goals and objectives to maintain throughout the project.
Stakeholder Meetings
KOA will coordinate with the City to provide outreach and solicit input from community stakeholders,
including private residents, the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) and City Council. The proposed sequence
of stakeholder meetings is as follows:
Anticipated Meeting Schedule:
• Informal meeting with community members and residents to discuss the subject traffic safety
issues
• Follow-up meetings with community members and residents to discuss potential solutions and
options
• Meeting with the TSC to present the Draft Traffic Calming Plans (DTCP)
• Follow-up meeting with the TSC to present the revised DTCP (i.e ., Final Draft Traffic Calming
Plans)
• City Council Meeting with Letter of Endorsement from TSC to present the FDTCP
• Optional -Follow-up meeting with City Council to present the Final Traffic Calming Plan, based
on any final/previous City Council and/or public comments
KOA will prepare agenda, project schedule, and other meeting materials and distribute them ahead of all
meetings. In addition, post-meeting, we will prepare meeting minutes including discussion and action
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1·des
Page 7
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T· 714.573.0317 I F. 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PAR I< ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO K~A
items. Meeting minutes and a copy of meeting materials will be distributed to attendees within five (5)
business days after the meeting .
Task 1 B Deliverables
• Meeting Agenda
• Presentation Materia ls
• Meeting Minutes
• Response(s) to Post-Meeting RFls
TASK 28-DATA COLLECTION
Task Summary:
• Task 2B .1 -48 -hour Speed counts -Up to three (3) locations
• Task 2B .2 -Collect/Compile Existing Documents and Collision Data
• Task 2B.3 -Conduct On -Site Field Observations and Measurements
The first step in the data collection process is to obtain traffic data to verify the existing conditions. The
City has indicated that recent traffic volume data for Hawthorne Boulevard is available and will be
provided to KOA. In the event that newer data is required , 24 -hour ADT volume counts will be conducted
on each segment for an additional fee as optional service.
Up to three (3) 48 -hour speed bin counts are proposed at locations to be identified by KOA with input
from stakeholders. KOA will also perform in -field observations on Hawthorne Boulevard to understand the
prevailing traffic concerns . KOA staff will conduct multiple drive runs on Hawthorne Boulevard in the
southbound direction and conduct a digital ball -bank analysis to assist in determining the safe curve
speeds . A summary of the field data count information KOA proposes to collect is listed as follows:
Proposed Field Data Collection :
• 48-Hour speed counts -up to 3 locations
• On -site field inspections (sight distance, visual observations, ball-bank field readings)
KOA has already acquired recent SWITRS collision data for the segment; however, we will also compile any
additional traffic collision data the City may have for Hawthorne Boulevard within the project limits.
Task 28 Deliverables
• Speed Counts
• 12 -Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts
• Field Reconnaissance Notes, Photo Logs and Observation Summaries
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALM I NG PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 8
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 j F 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TASI< 38-ANALYZE AND IDENTIFY ISSUES
Task Summary:
• Task 3B .1 -Collision Analyses
• Task 3B.2 -Sight Distance Analyses
• Task 3B.3 -Advisory Speed Curve Analysis
K~A
KOA will analyze the collected data and other researched information about the subject project locations
and report on the relevant findings. This will include reporting on the existing roadway, roadside and
traffic conditions observed in the field; existing traffic control devices; collision patterns; the relative traffic
speeds on each segment; prevailing traffic volume flows; observed deficiencies and issues; and
identification of sight distance concerns. KOA will also evaluate the safe horizontal speed curve
measurements to determine if advisory curve speed signs are warranted in the southbound direction.
Task 38 Deliverables
• Collision Diagrams
• Sight Distance Diagrams
• Safe Curve Speed Results
TASK 48-DEVELOP TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES AND OPTIONS
Task Summary:
• Task 4B.1 -Speeding Mitigation Plan
• Task 4B.2 -Traffic Control Device Upgrades
• Task 4B .3 -Other Traffic Calming Countermeasures
• Task 4B.4 -Coordination with RPV Police and Fire/LACFD
• Task 4B .5 -Rough Quantities and Cost Estimates
KOA will develop a range of traffic calming strategies and options to serve as a "toolbox" of potential
strategies to address the local contexts of each roadway and traffic safety issue. Traffic calming strategies
will be developed in accordance with national and industry practice, and comply with the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes standards, as well as State and Federal requirements. Traffic calming strategies and options
will be developed on the basis of low-cost/short-term, intermediate-cost/medium-term, and full-
cost/long-term priorities and schedules. KOA will prepare a summary of recommendations and options to
present to the City and stakeholders, and develop rough engineering quantities and estimates to reflect
the required funding to implement the preferred countermeasures developed in each Traffic Calming
Plan.
Task 48 Deliverables
• Summary of Recommendat ions
• Turning Templates for Emergency Services Vehicles (as required )
• Conceptual Engineering Cost Estimates
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 9
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104O51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARI( OR A NGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TASI< SB -COMPILE DRAFT TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN (DTCP)
Task Summa,y:
• Task SB .1 -Hawthorne Boulevard Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP)
~A
The Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP) will be a synthesis of all project outreach, data collection, analysis,
findings and recommendations produced in Tasks 1 through 4. The DTCP will include concept exhibits of
the preferred traffic calming alternatives, including construction standard references and rough order-of-
magnitu~e co~t ef¥i!l~PA73•~r1W.~\IJliffi(;tA~t~ rEW°§~'.&.~J<fY Committee following the
commun1ty/pnva+e res1aent ourreacli.
Task SB Deliverables
• Draft Traffic Calm in g Plan (DTCP)
TASK 6B -PREPARE DRAFT FINAL & FINAL TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN (DFTCP & FTCP)
Task Summary:
• Task 6B.1 -Hawthorne Boulevard Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
KOA will revise the DTCP and present the traffic calming plan as a Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
for City Council review. Any additional comments and/or public feedback obtained from the City Council
meeting will be incorporated into a Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP) for final City Council approval.
Task 6B Deliverables
• Draft Fi nal (DFTCP) & Final Traffi c Ca lm in g Plan (FTCP )
TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN 3 -HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD AT RAVENSPUR DRIVE
BACKGROUND
The City has identified the need to study reported traffic safety concerns at the intersections of
Hawthorne Boulevard and Ravenspur Drive. The project location is shown in the exhibit below (note : north
direction is facing downward in upper-half of the exhibit). Identified concerns include, but are not limited
to, the following:
• Constrained sight distance for drivers exiting from Ravenspur Drive onto Hawthorne Boulevard;
due to
• Horizontal curvature of the primary road;
• Cars lining up side-by-side blocking one another's view of oncoming traffic;
• Physical obstructions to sight distance in landscaped areas;
• Vehicle-pedestrian safety risks due to large volumes of crossing pedestrians
KOA will collect and analyze traffic, roadway and roadside data for at the Hawthorne Boulevard/Ravenspur
intersection and adjacent influence area, collect input from adjacent residents and stakeholders, identify
the prevailing safety concerns, then develop a traffic calming plan to address the issues.
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 10
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 J F: 714.573.9534 J www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
~:..L . . iiil
Hawthorne Boulevard and Ravenspur Drive Project Study Location
TASK 1C.1 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
Task Summary
• Task 1C.1 -Project Coordination and Administration
• Task 1 C.2 -Project Meetings
Kick-off meeting
K~A
Upon authorization to proceed, KOA will coordinate with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to set up a kick-
off meeting. The purpose of the initial conversation will be to finalize the project timeline, set up an
internal meeting schedule and agree upon the project communication channels. This meeting will also be
the first step in formalizing the parameters of the project, outlining project opportunities and challenges,
and addressing participant-specific project expectations moving forward, including stakeholder
engagement.
Additional goals of the kick-off meeting will be to:
• Review and discuss project overview;
• Confirm project schedule and details for reoccurring meetings;
• Establish compliance standards and guidelines (e.g., RPV Engineering Standards, Neighborhood
Traffic Calming Program, industry standards and best practices)
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1·des
Page 11
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B 104051798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARI< ORANGE ONT ARIO SAN DIEGO
• Distribute a list of data/document needs for the project; and
• Establish staff communication, project management process, and roles
As part of the kick-off meeting, we will facilitate with the City a plan for stakeholder analysis discussions to
clarify our public outreach mission, identify key stakeholders for each Traffic Calming Plan, and the
appropriate level of engagement, timing of activities to ensure congruency with our technical milestones,
and key messages, goals and objectives to maintain throughout the project.
Stake h ol der Meetings
KOA will coordinate with the City to provide outreach and solicit input from community stakeholders,
including private residents, the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) and City Council. The proposed sequence
of stakeholder meetings is as follows:
Anticipated Meeting Schedule:
• Informal meeting with community members and residents to discuss the subject traffic safety
issues
• Follow-up meetings with community members and residents to discuss potential solutions and
options
• Meeting with the TSC to present the Draft Traffic Calming Plans (DTCP)
• Follow-up meeting with the TSC to present the revised DTCP (i .e., Final Draft Traffic Calming
Plans)
• City Council Meeting with Letter of Endorsement from TSC to present the FDTCP
• Optional -Follow-up meeting with City Council to present the Final Traffic Calming Plan, based
on any final/previous City Council and/or public comments
KOA will prepare agenda, project schedule, and other meeting materials and distribute them ahead of all
meetings. In addition, post-meeting, we will prepare meeting minutes including discussion and action
items. Meeting minutes and a copy of meeting materials will be distributed to attendees within five (5)
business days after the meeting .
Task 1 C Deliverables
• Meet i ng Agenda
• Presentation Materials
• Meet i ng Minutes
• Response(s) t o Post -Meeting RFls
TASI< 2C -DATA COLLECTION
Task Summa,y:
• Task 2C.1 -48-hour Speed counts -1 location
• Task 2C.2 -Average Daily Traffic (24-hour ADT) counts -1 location
• Task 2C.3 -12-Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts (TMCs)
• Task 2C.4 -Collect/Compile Existing Documents and Collision Data
• Task 2C.5 -Conduct On-Site Field Observations and Measurements
RAI\JCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Vet des
Page 12
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
2141 W . O rangewood A v en ue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARI< ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO K~A
The first step in the data collection process is to obtain traffic data to verify the existing conditions. Traffic
speed counts will be collected on Hawthorne Boulevard near Ravenspur Drive to confirm any speeding
issues and determine the prevailing traffic speeds for use in assessing the required sight distance at the
intersection(s). A 48-hour speed bin count and 24 -hour ADT volume count will be conducted near the
intersection to gain a better understanding of the traffic patterns near the intersections and determine the
peak-hour periods of the day in anticipation of the two (2) traffic signal warrant analyses . 12-hour
intersection turning movement traffic volume counts (including pedestrian crossings) are also proposed
for the two intersections for use in conducting the traffic signal warrant analysis . KOA will also perform in-
field observations at the intersection to understand the prevailing traffic concerns, including sight distance
issues . A summary of the field data count information KOA proposes to collect is listed as follows:
Proposed Field Data Collection:
• 48-hour Speed counts -1 location
• Average Daily Traffic (24-hour ADT) counts -1 location
• 12-Hour Intersection Turning Movement counts -2 locations, for traffic signal warrant analyses
• On-site field inspections (sight distance, visual observations)
KOA will also compile any available traffic collision data from the City in the vicinity of the intersection(s).
Task 2C Deliverables
• Speed Counts Data
• ADT Counts Data
• 12 -Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts
• Fie ld Reconnaissance Notes , Photo Logs and Observation Summaries
TASI{ 3C-ANALVZE AND IDENTIFY ISSUES
Tas k Summary:
• Task 3C.1 -Traffic Signal Warrant Analyses (2)
• Task 3C.2 -Collision Analyses
• Task 3C.3 -Sight Distance Analyses
KOA will analyze the collected data and other researched information about the subject project locations
and report on the relevant findings . This will include reporting on the existing roadway, roadside and
traffic conditions observed in the field; existing traffic control devices ; collision patterns; the relative traffic
speeds on each segment; prevailing traffic volume flows; observed deficiencies and issues; identification
of sight distance concerns; and the results of the two (2) traffic signal warrant analyses .
Task 3C Deliverables
• Summary of Traffic Safety Issues and Warrant Analysis
• Collision Diagrams
• Sight Distance Diagrams
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALIVllf\lG PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 13
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T. 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TASK 4C-DEVELOP TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES AND OPTIONS
Task Summary:
• Task 4C.1 -Speeding Mitigation Plan
• Task 4C.2 -Traffic Control Device Upgrades
• Task 4C.3 -Other Traffic Calming Countermeasures
• Task 4C.4 -Coordination with RPV Police and Fire/LACFD
• Task 4C.S -Rough Quantities and Cost Estimates
KOA will develop a range of traffic calming strategies and options to serve as a "toolbox" of potential
strategies to address the local contexts of each roadway and traffic safety issue. Traffic calming strategies
will be developed in accordance with national and industry practice, and comply with the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes standards, as well as State and Federal requirements. Traffic calming strategies and options
will be developed on the basis of low-cost/short-term, intermediate-cost/medium-term, and full-
cost/long-term priorities and schedules. KOA will prepare a summary of recommendations and options to
present to the City and stakeholders, and develop rough engineering quantities and estimates to reflect
the required funding to implement the preferred countermeasures developed in each Traffic Calming
Plan.
Task 4C Deliverables
• Summary of Recommendation s
• Turning Templates for Emergency Services Veh icles (as required )
• Conceptual Engineering Cost Estimates
TASK SC -COMPILE DRAFT TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN (DTCP)
Task SummOJ y:
• Task SC.1 -Hawthorne Boulevard at Ravenspur Drive Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP)
The Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP) will be a synthesis of all project outreach, data collection, analysis,
findings and recommendations produced in Tasks 1 through 4. The DTCP will include concept exhibits of
the preferred traffic calming alternatives, including construction standard references and rough order-of-
magnitude cost estimates. The DTCP will be presented to the Traffic Safety Committee following the
community/private resident outreach.
Task SC Deliverables
• Draft Traffi c Calm i ng Plan (DTCP)
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1·des
Page 14
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONT ARIO SAN DIEGO ~A
TASK 6C-PREPARE DRAFT FINAL & FINAL TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN (DFTCP & FTCP)
Task Summary:
• Task 6C.1 -Hawthorne Boulevard at Ravenspur Drive Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
KOA will revise the DTCP and present the traffic calming plan as a Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
for City Council review. Any additional comments and/or public feedback obtained from the City Council
meeting will be incorporated into a Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP) for final City Council approval.
Task 6C Deliverables
• Draft Fi na l (DFTCP) & Fina l Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP)
TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN 4 -AVENIDA CLASSICA
BACKGROUND
The City has identified the need to study reported traffic safety concerns on Avenida Classica between
Crest Road and Los Verdes Drive. The project location is shown in the exhibit below. Identified concerns
include, but are not limited to, the following :
• Speeding in both directions
• Resident recollection of recent traffic collisions
• High left-turn speeds from Los Verdes Drive onto Avenida Classica
• Need for additional traffic controls on Los Verdes Drive at Avenida Classica
• Excessive cut-through traffic due to golf course related traffic
KOA will collect and analyze traffic, roadway and roadside data for the subject segment, collect input from
adjacent residents and stakeholders, identify the prevailing speeding and safety concerns, then develop a
traffic calming plan to address the issues .
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1·des
Page 15
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W . Orang ewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www koacorp.corn
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TASK 1D.1 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
Task Summary
• Task 1 D.1 -Project Coordination and Administration
• Task 1 D.2 -Project Meetings
Kick-off meeting
K~A
Upon authorization to proceed, KOA will coordinate with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to set up a kick -
off meeting. The purpose of the initial conversation will be to finalize the project timeline, set up an
internal meeting schedule and agree upon the project communication channels . This meeting will also be
the first step in formalizing the parameters of the project, outlining project opportunities and challenges,
and addressing participant-specific project expectations moving forward, including stakeholder
engagement.
Additional goals of the kick -off meeting will be to:
• Review and discuss project overview;
• Confirm project schedule and details for reoccurring meetings;
• Establish compliance standards and guidelines (e .g ., RPV Engineering Standards, Neighborhood
Traffic Calming Program, industry standards and best practices)
• Distribute a list of data/document needs for the project; and
• Establish staff communication, project management process, and roles
As part of the kick-off meeting, we will facilitate with the City a plan for stakeholder analysis discussions to
clarify our public outreach mission, identify key stakeholders for each Traffic Calming Plan, and the
appropriate level of engagement, timing of activities to ensure congruency with our technical milestones,
and key messages, goals and objectives to maintain throughout the project.
Stakeholder Meetings
KOA will coordinate with the City to provide outreach and solicit input from community stakeholders,
including private residents, the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) and City Council. The proposed sequence
of stakeholder meetings is as follows :
Anticipated Meeting Schedule:
• Informal meeting with community members and residents to discuss the subject traffic safety
issues
• Follow-up meetings with community members and residents to discuss potential solutions and
options
• Meeting with the TSC to present the Draft Traffic Calming Plans (DTCP)
• Follow-up meeting with the TSC to present the revised DTCP (i.e., Final Draft Traffic Calming
Plans)
• City Council Meeting with Letter of Endorsement from TSC to present the FDTCP
• Optional -Follow-up meeting with City Council to present the Final Traffic Calming Plan, based
on any final/previous City Council and/or public comments
KOA will prepare agenda, project schedule, and other meeting materials and distribute them ahead of all
meetings. In addition, post-meeting, we will prepare meeting minutes including discussion and action
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALM I NG PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1·des
Page 16
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 J F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.co111
MONTEREY PARI< ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO ~A
items. Meeting minutes and a copy of meeting materials will be distributed to attendees within five (5)
business days after the meeting.
Task 1 D Deliverables
• Meeting Agenda
• Presentation Materials
• Meeti ng Minutes
• Response(s) to Post-Meeting RFls
TASK 2D -DATA COLLECTION
Task Summary:
• Task 2D .1 -48-hour Speed counts -1 location
• Task 2D.2 -Average Daily Traffic (24-hour ADD counts -1 location
• Task 2D .3 -8-Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts (TMCs) -2 locations
• Task 2D.4 -Collect/Compile Existing Documents and Collision Data
• Task 2D.5 -Conduct On-Site Field Observations and Measurements
The first step in the data collection process is to obtain traffic data to verify the existing conditions. KOA
will collect 48-hour speed counts and 24-hour traffic volume counts for the subject segment to confirm
the existing conditions and issues. Two (2) 8-hour intersection turning movement traffic volume counts
will also be conducted at the intersections of Avenida Classica & Los Verdes Drive, and Avenida Classica &
Avenue Esplendida, for use in conducting the subsequent multi-way stop control warrant assessments.
KOA will also perform in-field observations along the street to understand the prevailing traffic concerns.
A summary of the field data count information KOA proposes to collect is listed as follows:
Proposed Field Data Collection:
• 48-hour Speed counts -1 location
• Average Daily Traffic (24-hour ADT) counts -1 location
• 8-Hour Intersection Turning Movement counts -2 locations, for multi-way stop sign warrants
• On-site field inspections (sight distance, visual observations)
KOA will also compile any available traffic collision data from the City along the subject segment.
Task 2D Deliverables
• Speed Counts Data
• ADT Counts Data
• 8-Hour Intersect ion Turning Movement Counts
• Field Reconnaissance Notes , Photo Logs and Observation Summaries
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 17
MCl3039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TASI< 3D-ANALYZE AND IDENTIFY ISSUES
Task Summary:
• Task 3D.1 -Stop Sign Warrant Analyses
• Task 3D.2 -Collision Analyses
• Task 3D.3 -Sight Distance Analyses
K-,A
KOA will analyze the collected data and other researched information about the subject project locations
and report on the relevant findings. This will include reporting on the existing roadway, roadside and
traffic conditions observed in the field; existing traffic control devices; collision patterns; the relative traffic
speeds on each segment; prevailing traffic volume flows; observed deficiencies and issues; identification
of sight distance concerns; and the results of the stop sign warrant analyses.
Task 3D Deliverables
• Summary of Traffic Safety Issues and Warrant Analyses
• Collis ion Diagrams
• Sight Distance Diagrams
TASK 4D-DEVELOP TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES AND OPTIONS
Task Summary:
• Task 4D .1 -Speeding Mitigation Plan
• Task 4D.2 -Traffic Control Device Upgrades
• Task 4D.3 -Other Traffic Calming Countermeasures
• Task 4D.4 -Coordination with RPV Police and Fire/LACFD
• Task 4D.5 -Rough Quantities and Cost Estimates
KOA will develop a range of traffic calming strategies and options to serve as a "toolbox" of potential
strategies to address the local contexts of each roadway and traffic safety issue. Traffic calming strategies
will be developed in accordance with national and industry practice, and comply with the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes standards, as well as State and Federal requirements . Traffic calming strategies and options
will be developed on the basis of low-cost/short-term, intermediate-cost/medium-term, and full-
cost/long -term priorities and schedules. KOA will prepare a summary of recommendations and options to
present to the City and stakeholders, and develop rough engineering quantities and estimates to reflect
the required funding to implement the preferred countermeasures developed in each Traffic Calming
Plan.
Task 4D Deliverables
• Summary of Recommendations
• Turning Templates for Emergency Services Vehicles (as required)
• Conceptual Engineering Cost Estimate s
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 18
MCl3039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104O51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F: 714 573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TASK SD-COMPILE DRAFT TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS (DTCP)
Task Summary:
• Task SD .1 -Avenida Classica Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP)
K~A
The Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP) will be a synthesis of all project outreach, data collection, analysis ,
findings and recommendations produced in Tasks 1 through 4. The DTCP will include concept exhibits of
the preferred traffic calming alternatives, including construction standard references and rough order-of-
magnitude cost estimates. The DTCP will be presented to the Traffic Safety Committee following the
community/private resident outreach.
Task SD Deliverables
• Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP)
TASK 6D -PREPARE DRAFT FINAL & FINAL TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN (DFTCP & FTCP)
Task Summary:
• Task 6D .1 -Avenida Classica Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
KOA will revise the DTCP and present the traffic calming plan as a Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
for City Council review. Any additional comments and/or public feedback obtained from the City Council
meeting will be incorporated into a Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP) for final City Council approval.
Task 6D Deliverables
• Draft Fina l (DFTCP) & Final Traffic Ca l ming Plan (FTCP)
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DFVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1 des
Page 19
MC-13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-19B104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F· 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PAR I< ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN 5 -FOND DU LAC ROAD
BACKGROUND
The City has identified the need to study reported traffic
safety concerns on Fond Du Lac Road Basswood Avenue and
Littlebow Road. The project location is shown in the exhibit
to the right. Identified concerns include, but are not limited
to, the following :
• Vehicle speeding, in both direction
• Steep vertical roadway grades
• Traffic safety concerns for pedestrians and bicyclists
along the roadway in conflict with approaching
vehicles
KOA will collect and analyze traffic, roadway and roadside
data for the subject segment, collect input from adjacent
residents and stakeholders, identify the prevailing speeding
and safety concerns, then develop a traffic calming plan to
address the issues .
TASK 1E .1 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND
ADMINISTRATION
Task Summary
• Task 1 E.1 -Project Coordination and Administration
• Task 1 E.2 -Project Meetings
Kick -off meeting
K~A
V
D:" _..,,
"' 11' c_
C
"' ·a
-'.:
Pa los Ver
Hi (
Upon authorization to proceed, KOA will coordinate with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to set up a kick -
off meeting . The purpose of the initial conversation will be to finalize the project timeline, set up an
internal meeting schedule and agree upon the project communication channels. This meeting will also be
the first step in formalizing the parameters of the project, outlining project opportunities and challenges,
and addressing participant-specific project expectations moving forward , including stakeholder
engagement.
Additional goals of the kick -off meeting will be to:
• Review and discuss project overview;
• Confirm project schedule and details for reoccurring meetings;
• Establish compliance standards and guidelines (e.g., RPV Engineering Standards, Neighborhood
Traffic Calming Program, industry standards and best practices)
• Distribute a list of data/document needs for the project; and
• Establish staff communication, project management process, and roles
As part of the kick-off meeting, we will facilitate with the City a plan for stakeholder analysis discussions to
clarify our public outreach mission, identify key stakeholders for each Traffic Calming Plan, and the
appropriate level of engagement, timing of activities to ensure congruency with our technical milestones,
and key messages, goals and objectives to maintain throughout the project.
RAl\!CHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 20
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T. 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
Stakeholder Meetings
K~A
KOA will coordinate with the City to provide outreach and solicit input from community stakeholders,
includ i ng private residents, the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) and City Council. The proposed sequence
of stakeholder meetings is as follows:
Anticipated Meeting Schedule:
• Informal meeting with community members and residents to discuss the subject traffic safety
issues
• Follow-up meetings with community members and residents to discuss potential solutions and
options
• Meeting with the TSC to present the Draft Traffic Calming Plans (DTCP)
• Follow -up meeting with the TSC to present the revised DTCP (i.e ., Final Draft Traffic Calming
Plans)
• City Council Meeting with Letter of Endorsement from TSC to present the FDTCP
• Optional -Follow -up meeting with City Council to present the Final Traffic Calming Plan, based
on any final/previous City Council and/or public comments
KOA will prepare agenda, project schedule , and other meeting materials and distribute them ahead of all
meetings. In addition, post-meeting, we will prepare meeting minutes including discussion and action
items. Meeting minutes and a copy of meeting materials will be distributed to attendees within five (5)
business days after the meeting .
Task 1 E Deliverables
• Meeting Agenda
• Presentat ion Materials
• Meet i ng Minutes
• Response(s) to Post-Meet ing RFls
TASK 2E -DATA COLLECTION
Task Summary:
• Task 2E .1 -48 -hour Speed counts -1 location
• Task 2E.2 -Average Daily Traffic (24 -hour ADT) counts -1 location
• Task 2E.3 -Collect/Compile Existing Documents and Collision Data
• Task 2E.4 -Conduct On-Site Field Observations and Measurements
The first step in the data collection process is to obtain traffic data to verify the existing conditions . KOA
will collect 48hour speed counts and and 24-hour traffic volume counts for the subject segment to
confirm the existing conditions and issues . KOA will also perform in -field observations along the street to
understand the prevailing traffic concerns . A summary of the field data count information KOA proposes
to collect is listed as follows :
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve,·des
Page 21
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T. 714.573.0317 I F: 714 .573.9534 I www.koacorp.mm
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
Proposed Field Data Collection:
• 48-hour Speed counts -1 location
• Average Daily Traffic (24 -hour ADT) counts -1 location
• On-site field inspections (sight distance, visual observations)
K~A
KOA will also compile any available traffic collision data from the City along the subject segment.
Task 2E Deliverables
• Speed Counts Data
• ADT Counts Data
• Fie ld Reconnaissance Notes, Photo Logs and Observation Summaries
TASK 3E -ANALYZE AND IDENTIFY ISSUES
Task Summary:
• Task 3E.1 -Collision Analyses
• Task 3E.2 -Sight Distance Analyses
KOA will analyze the collected data and other researched information about the subject project locations
and report on the relevant findings . This will include reporting on the existing roadway, roadside and
traffic conditions observed in the field; existing traffic control devices; collision patterns; the relative traffic
speeds on each segment; prevailing traffic volume flows; observed deficiencies and issues; and
identification of sight distance concerns.
Task 3E Deliverables
• Collision Diagrams
• Sight Distance Diagrams
TASK 4E-DEVELOP TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES AND OPTIONS
Task Summary:
• Task 4E.1 -Speeding Mitigation Plan
• Task 4E.2 -Traffic Control Device Upgrades
• Task 4E.3 -Other Traffic Calming Countermeasures
• Task 4E.4 -Coordination with RPV Police and Fire/LACFD
• Task 4E.5 -Rough Quantities and Cost Estimates
KOA will develop a range of traffic calming strategies and options to serve as a "toolbox" of potential
strategies to address the local contexts of each roadway and traffic safety issue. Traffic calming strategies
will be developed in accordance with national and industry practice, and comply with the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes standards, as well as State and Federal requirements. Traffic calming strategies and options
will be developed on the basis of low-cost/short-term, intermediate-cost/medium-term, and full-
cost/long-term priorities and schedules. KOA will prepare a summary of recommendations and options to
RAI\JCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1·des
Page 22
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714 .573.0317 I F: 714.573 9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO ~A
present to the City and stakeholders, and develop rough engineering quantities and estimates to reflect
the required funding to implement the preferred countermeasures developed in each Traffic Calming
Plan .
Task 4E Deliverables
• Summary of Recommendations
• Turning Templates for Emergency Services Vehicles (as required )
• Conceptual Engineering Cost Estimates
TASK SE -COMPILE DRAFT TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS (DTCP)
Task Summary:
• Task SE.1 -Fond Du Lac Road Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP)
The Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP) will be a synthesis of all project outreach, data collection, analysis,
findings and recommendations produced in Tasks 1 through 4. The DTCP will include concept exhibits of
the preferred traffic calming alternatives, including construction standard references and rough order-of-
magnitude cost estimates. The DTCP will be presented to the Traffic Safety Committee following the
community/private resident outreach.
Task SE Deliverables
• Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP)
TASI< GE-PREPARE DRAFT FINAL & FINAL TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN (DFTCP & FTCP)
Task Summary:
• Task 6E .1 -Fond Du Lac Road Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
KOA will revise the DTCP and present the traffic calming plan as a Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
for City Council review. Any additional comments and/or public feedback obtained from the City Council
meeting will be incorporated into a Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP) for final City Council approval.
Task GE Deliverables
• Draft Final (DFTCP) & Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP)
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 23
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARI< ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN 6 -LA ROTONDA DRIVE
BACKGROUND
K_,,A
The City has identified the need to study reported traffic safety concerns on La Rotonda Drive between
Palos Verdes Drive South and the westerly terminus at the multi-use trail golf course. The project location
is shown in the exhibit below. Identified concerns include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Speeding vehicles in the downhill (south/west bound) direction, particularly as motorists arrive on
La Rotonda Drive from Palos Verdes Drive South
• On-street parking impacts on mobility and sight distance
• Misdirected motorists attempting to access the golf course turning onto La Rotonda Drive, who
return in the opposite direction with high speeds and unsafe maneuvering
• Potential collision risks to pedestrian residents and visitors, as well as unloading passengers
• Unsafe Li-turning
KOA will collect and analyze traffic, roadway and roadside data for the subject segment, collect input from
nearby residents and stakeholders, identify the prevailing speeding and safety concerns, then develop a
traffic calming plan to address the issues .
TASK 1F.1 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
Task Summary
• Task 1 F.1 -Project Coordination and Administration
• Task 1 F.2 -Project Meetings
Kick -off meeting
Upon authorization to proceed, KOA will coordinate with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to set up a kick-
off meeting. The purpose of the initial conversation will be to finalize the project timeline, set up an
internal meeting schedule and agree upon the project communication channels. This meeting will also be
RAI\JCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 24
IV1C13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 IF: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARI< ORANGE ONT ARIO SAN DIEGO K~A
the first step in formalizing the parameters of the project, outlining project opportunities and challenges,
and addressing participant-specific project expectations moving forward, including stakeholder
engagement.
Additional goals of the kick-off meeting will be to:
• Review and discuss project overview;
• Confirm project schedule and details for reoccurring meetings;
• Establish compliance standards and guidelines (e .g ., RPV Engineering Standards, Neighborhood
Traffic Calming Program, industry standards and best practices)
• Distribute a list of data/document needs for the project; and
• Establish staff communication, project management process, and roles
As part of the kick-off meeting, we will facilitate with the City a plan for stakeholder analysis discussions to
clarify our public outreach mission, identify key stakeholders for each Traffic Calming Plan, and the
appropriate level of engagement, timing of activities to ensure congruency with our technical milestones,
and key messages, goals and objectives to maintain throughout the project.
Stakeho lder Meet ings
KOA will coordinate with the City to provide outreach and solicit input from community stakeholders,
including private residents, the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) and City Council. The proposed sequence
of stakeholder meetings is as follows:
Anticipated Meeting Schedule:
• Informal meeting with community members and residents to discuss the subject traffic safety
issues
• Follow-up meetings with community members and residents to discuss potential solutions and
options
• Meeting with the TSC to present the Draft Traffic Calming Plans (DTCP)
• Follow-up meeting with the TSC to present the revised DTCP (i .e., Final Draft Traffic Calming
Plans)
• City Council Meeting with Letter of Endorsement from TSC to present the FDTCP
• Optional-Follow-up meeting with City Council to present the Final Traffic Calming Plan, based
on any final/previous City Council and/or public comments
KOA will prepare agenda, project schedule, and other meeting materials and distribute them ahead of all
meetings. In addition, post-meeting, we will prepare meeting minutes including discussion and action
items. Meeting minutes and a copy of meeting materials will be distributed to attendees within five (5)
business days after the meeting.
Task 1 F Deliverables
• Meet i ng Agenda
• Presentation Materia ls
• Meeting Minutes
• Response(s) to Post -Meeting RFls
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 25
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AFBBA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F· 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
TASK 2F -DATA COLLECTION
Task Summary:
• Task 2F .1 -48-hour Speed counts -1 location
• Task 2F.2 -Average Daily Traffic (24-hour ADT) counts -1 location
• Task 2F.3 -Collect/Compile Existing Documents and Collision Data
• Task 2F.4 -Conduct On-Site Field Observations and Measurements
~A
The first step in the data collection process is to obtain traffic data to verify the existing conditions. KOA
will collect 48 -hour speed counts and 24 -hour traffic volume counts for the subject segment to confirm
the existing conditions and issues . KOA will also perform in -field observations along the street to
understand the prevailing traffic concerns. A summary of the field data count information KOA proposes
to collect is listed as follows :
Proposed Field Data Collection :
• 48-hour Speed counts -1 location
• Average Daily Traffic (24 -hour ADT) counts -1 location
• On -site field inspect ions (sight distance, visual observations)
KOA will also compile any available traffic collision data from the City along the subject segment.
Task 2F Deliverables
• Speed Counts Data
• ADT Counts Data
• Field Reconnaissance Notes, Photo Logs and Observation Summaries
TASK 3F -ANALYZE AND IDENTIFY ISSUES
Task Summary:
• Task 3F .1 -Collision Analyses
• Task 3F .2 -Sight Distance Analyses
KOA will analyze the collected data and other researched information about the subject project locations
and report on the relevant findings. This will include reporting on the existing roadway, roadside and
t raffic conditions observed in the field; existing traffic control devices; collision patterns; the relative traffic
speeds on each segment; p revailing traffic volume flows ; observed deficiencies and issues ; and
identification of sight distance concerns.
Task 3F Deliverables
• Collision Diagrams
• Sight Distance Diagrams
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 26
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T· 714.573.0317 I F: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARI< ORANGE ONT ARIO SAN DIEGO
TASI< 4F-DEVELOP TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES AND OPTIONS
Task Summary:
• Task 4F.1 -Speeding Mitigation Plan
• Task 4F.2 -Traffic Control Device Upgrades
• Task 4F.3 -Other Traffic Calming Countermeasures
• Task 4F.4 -Coordination with RPV Police and Fire/LACFD
• Task 4F.5 -Rough Quantities and Cost Estimates
~A
KOA will develop a range of traffic calming strategies and options to serve as a "toolbox" of potential
strategies to address the local contexts of each roadway and traffic safety issue . Traffic calming strategies
will be developed in accordance with national and industry practice, and comply with the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes standards, as well as State and Federal requirements . Traffic calming strategies and options
will be developed on the basis of low-cost/short-term, intermediate-cost/medium-term, and full-
cost/long-term priorities and schedules. KOA will prepare a summary of recommendations and options to
present to the City and stakeholders, and develop rough engineering quantities and estimates to reflect
the required funding to implement the preferred countermeasures developed in each Traffic Calming
Plan.
Task 4F Deliverables
• Summary of Recommendat i ons
• Turning Templates for Emergency Services Veh icles (as required )
• Conceptual Engineering Cost Estimates
TASK SF-COMPILE DRAFT TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS (DTCP)
Task Summary:
• Task SF .1 -La Rotonda Drive Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP)
The Draft Traffic Calming Plan (DTCP) will be a synthesis of all project outreach, data collection, analysis ,
findings and recommendations produced in Tasks 1 through 4. The DTCP will include concept exhibits of
the preferred traffic calming alternatives, including construction standard references and rough order-of-
magnitude cost estimates. The DTCP will be presented to the Traffic Safety Committee following the
community/private resident outreach.
Task SF Deliverables
• Draft Traffic Ca l m i ng Plan (DTCP)
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1·des
Page 27
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51 798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F· 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARI< ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO K-,A
TASI< 6F-PREPARE DRAFT FINAL & FINAL TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN (DFTCP & FTCP)
Task Summary:
• Task 6F.1 -La Rotonda Drive Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
KOA will revise the DTCP and present the traffic calming plan as a Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
for City Council review. Any additional comments and/or public feedback obtained from the City Council
meeting will be incorporated into a Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP) for final City Council approval.
Task 6F Deliverables
• Draft Final (DFTCP) & Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP)
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 28
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF88A6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 IF: 714 .573.9534 I www.koacorp.corn
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO ~A
KOA will revise the DTCP and present the traffic calming plan as a Draft Final Traffic Calming Plan (DFTCP)
for City Council review. Any additional comments and/or public feedback obtained from the City Council
meeting will be incorporated into a Final Traffic Calming Plan (FTCP) for final City Council approval.
Task 6F Deliverables
• Draft Final (DFTCP) & Final Traffi c Calm ing Plan (FTCP)
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1·des
Page 30
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AFBBA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
01203.0006/695867. l EQG
EXHIBIT "B"
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)
[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
B-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AFBBA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
EXHIBIT "C"
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
0!203.0006/695867.l EQG C-1
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF88A6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 IF: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
FEE ESTIMATE
K~A
KOA Corporation will perform the work specified in the scope above based on a Not-to-Exceed amount of
$89,636. This fee estimate reflects the base fee of $88,570 for completing Tasks 1 through 6 described
above, plus an optional fee of $1,067 for attending a final meeting to present the Final Traffic Calming
Plans for City Council approval. Should the City require additional data to be studied or other services
beyond the scope of work described above, or subsequent engineering/design work to be completed,
additional fees may be requested.
The total budget is based upon the work scope and level of effort presented above and includes the cost
of all related technical and administrative services . The work scope is considered complete upon
submittal of a final document by KOA. Any additional services requested after study submittal will be
considered as extra work and those fees will be negotiated prior to start of work and secured in writing.
If the work described within this letter is not authorized in 30 days, if changes occur in the work scope or
level of effort, or if our work is suspended for more than 180 days due to any circumstances beyond KOA
Corporation's control, we reserve the right to revise the work scope, budget and schedule to reflect
current conditions. Such revisions will be effected through mutually agreed upon amendments or
modifications to this agreement.
Services rendered for out-of-scope work will be billed based on a negotiated fee schedule. Out-of-scope
work generally includes items not specifically detailed in the work scope above, and specifically includes
the following:
• Conducting Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) speed zoning studies
• Updating the existing Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
• Additional formal meetings not specified herein;
• Development of mass -produced outreach materials
STAFFING
Mr. Stephen Bise will be the project manager of this project. Greg Garces will serve duly as Deputy Project
Manager and the designated person for the City to contact regarding the day-to-day status of the project.
KOA Corporation reserves the right to change the assigned staffing on this project if necessary.
RANCHO PALOS VERDES DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Page 30
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104O51798
Fee Estimate • Rev .2
Qi1nJ:: City of R1ni;ho Palo s Ve,des
,l(ickoffMeeting
•ProgreuMeetings
•Stakeholde,Meetings
• Traffic ~fety Committee Meetings OTCP
• 1st City Council Meeting/Presentation • ORCP
, 2nd Cuy Co1mo/ Mee/in /Pres.ento/ron FTCP (opr1onol} 0 J 12S
Subtotal S25
2 DataCo11ectlon
Subto11I 10
IS "" 3.0 1450
"' sm S675
so 10
Sl75 1.5 Sl73 1.5 1150 1.5 Sl43
OJ SJJ 0.1 SU OJ H O
so S763 S299 S250 3 S247
$0 $1,US $0 $900 $855
12.0 Sl,583
0.5 JlB
lo 20.0 S2,570
•Meeting Agenda
• PresentltionMlleriah
•Mee1in9 Min111e1
•Rupoote(s)topost•meetingRfls
t--+========~------+--+--+-l_.o-+_1_19_5+--+--+--+--+-c:~:~-+~!~~~!,-+--+--+~:~:~-+~!!=~~l +-:~:~-+~:~;:~l +-----+-~15~~:-+-~•:~~~~,'---< : ~:::;d~:;::sntana~m
t--+~~~=~~=-----~5,~,,-0,~,,+-~+-~10-+-~.,-..,,~1975+-~+-~so-+~-+-,=,-+-1~3'-+7:~~:5~'+-~+-,=,-+-~~·'-+~s~27.~~13+-'=i;-+71~~~:4=13+-_710~~,-...,,2~~',-+--c,~~~;=~---< •Sightdi111ncedi19,ams
~==f~".:jj'.";Jfj~'.:'.ft:i';':i;':;:::;:============1===1===1====1===1===1===1===~:::s::199:t:::'.::~=t'.:!~::!!:::!===!===t::;:::~=t'.:!~~:l:::l !=:::::~:!::::'.::::::1=======j~'.:!::::: j~:::::!~:::: ~ : ~~:::;,:;;,~:~::::;~::~cy ser/ice l--f.c'c-""c=F=""=:'=.''c="'7~'-cc,,-----t---t---t--+--+-=1·'--+...,l~lSOc..+~1 ·5--+~Sl~9'-+--;:~;-+~!~cc!:,-+--t---+--;:~:~-+~!~cc:,-+-2~·'➔...,l~l90c..+------,f---,,;:,;.; +--;:cc:~c-5-; whitles (•s rtqviredJ
t--t-=~====~~~~~~---+--+--+~l.~0-+~,~.,~, +--+--+--+--+-cl~.,-+-,-ll",25,-+--+--+~,~.0-+-,!2,,-01,-+--+--+------,'"""""4.~0-+---,,~52~1---< •Conceptu•I Engineerin,gConEstiffiites
Total
Tuk l .l :Pr 'ectCoo,dination andAdminiltration
T11kl.2:ProjectMeetings
•KickoffMeeting
•Prog renMeetings
•StakeholderMtttings
• Traffic Safety Committee Meetings OTCP
• ht City Council Metting/Presentiltion • DFTCP
Subtotal
S521
• }nd C,ry Cou,ml Mtt/Ul 1P,esen101,an FTCP (opr,onal} 0 J SlS
Sublo11I O $25
1.5
OJ
195 150 398 62S 904 570 SO 2S.O SU 4l
Si.275 S393 26 S3.263 1299 S4.457 412 Sl.955
l.S $225 3.0 sns 1.0 SUS 1.0 $100 1.0 S95
1293 3.0 ,,so '375 Sl73 1.5 1150 1.5 Sl43
'"' OJ lJJ OJ SU OJ UO
S3 12 S67S so 6 $763 3 $299 $250 3 $247
Sl.450
10
13S.l $16,903 •Bne •Op1ional
$910
llS S78
20.0 Sl.S70
• Meeting Ag enda
•Presentation Materi1h
•Mutin9Mir11,te1
•RupoMe(s)topost-meetingRF/s
2 Dat.JI Collfftion • pee ra arcoun a f-'--+,",."".,".1"', •"'°• "H~"",~5-,~,,~Co-,-,.,~13~)-------+--+--+----+--+--+---+---+--t---+---+--J---j---j----f---+--+--,~.,~,-+~,7.0-l-~,7.600cc-l · AOT count data
l---t"'c-""c,','~==.,---------+--+---+--+--+--+--+--+--+-':~:~-+-c:1"'';:c-: +--+--+-';cc:~-+-c!~c:c::c-: +-;:cc:~;-+-;:=~::'-: +-----t--c!:,;.: +--;:=:~7:-; : ~;:1~:i;i:1:~:::::r1ms
1---t========"-----~5,~.,,-0,~,,+-~+-7.s,-+-~+-7.10-+~-+~SO-+~--t-,~,-+--,1,,'30-+~!~cc:5,_5 +-~+-,~,-+~',,'6'-+~!~ccOc-l +-''c·''-+_.;:ccgc-:+--~SO~---,l-,,l~~~-+-""s~~5:=c:3-; • Advi,oryspeedcuiveana!ysis
>--t=======~-------+--+--+--+--+--+--+-~+--<-'1~·'-1-~11~25'-+--+--+~'~·'-+~"~'~' -+-'~·'-+~'~''°-'-+------,f-"5·~'-+-~'~"~'---< • Summary of recommendations
f---f"'c-""-''-=~~="-c'=~------j---f---f--+--+-~l.O,-t~l7.l50c--t-cc~:!c-+-c:lcc1:;+...,:7:~-+-c!:cc~!,-+--j---+_.;;c,:~-+-c!~cc~c-l +-;cc:~➔_.;:"::c--f------,f-'c~:7:+_.;:cc;~~5 -; •Tu1ning temp!1tesf0teme19encyservice
~==~:;::;:~'.'.:;:;'.;:;:;:;'.~:;:~:'.;'.:'.:;::;::;::;::::::;:~;::;:;:======~===~===~====~=-l=-l9:;:5 ~===~=::::=~=::::=~=::::=;=::;::~=;:;:!!~~:;::~===~===;=.:~:~=;:;:!!~:=~=::::=~=::::=~=======~:::::;!:~: ~::::=-:~~!=: ~ ~:t~:::::~;e~~;~:~ring Cost Estimates
Total
1 Pro"ac:t M,na ffl'ltnt
T11k 1.1: Pro·ect Coo1din11ion and Administrttion
h skl.2:ProjectMeetings
•Kickoff Meeting
• Progress Meetings
•Stakeholde,Mutings
• Traffic S..fetyComminee Meetings DTCP
•lstCityCouncilMeeting/PrHen111ion -OFTCP
Subtou1!
$521
, ]11d C,ty Covn,,I Mettmq/P,esrmror,on FTCP (oprionol/ 0.J S2S
Sub101,1 0 S2S
1.5
OJ
19S 150 398 S 62S 9 904 570 SO 2S.O Sl,142
Sl,092 Sl,275 S398 26 S3,263 ""
1.5 S22S 3.0 S37S 1.0 SllS 1.0 noo 1.0 S95
S,93 1450 3.0 S37S 1.5 S173 1.5 mo 1.5 Sl<13
'" OJ SB OJ SJ.? 0 1 SJO
$312 $675 so 6 S763 3 ,m mo 3 $247 $0
122.1 $14,941 •8ase ♦O tional
7.5 $910
12.0 Sl.583
OS S7B
20.0 $2,570
• MutingAgend1
•P1esentalionMateri1!s
•Meeting Minutes
• RuponH(s) to post-meeting Rfls
2 Dall Co lla-,;tlon ~::'.~!~fJ~jff~};;;:;;:~;;;~[==============t===t===t====t===t===t===t===t===~===~===t===t===~===~===t===t===t==J:~~~~: ==~=:;:~:~;:~=}::~~,:;:~ : :~~e::~:,•:::unt dm
t--t-~=~===~===-,~----+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--t-,-,~.,-+-~11~25,-+--+--+-~170-+-~ll~OO,-+~l~.,-+~,~.,,-+-~ll~,OOO--;~~:~,-+~S:3'"'':,-< : ::;;,::::,:~n:u;::::1photok,gsand
8.0 Sl,000 8.0 saoo 8.0 S760 USO 24.0 S2,710 obs,rv11ion summaries t--+===========~~,.~.,,-o,.~, +-~+-=so-+~~+-=so-+~-+~so-+~-+~,~,-+-~,e'----<1-1'"1.=12~5 +-~+-c10~,-,~-,,oo~+-~t-c,.=ss,-+--,-S1~.,~so-+-2"'1•-,-1-,.'".~,,.,,....
10 Sl95 1.0 Sl2S 12.0 Sl.200 12.0 Sl.140 26.0 $2,660 •Summ1,yof1lgn1l wair1nt1nalyses l--f.c'c-~~=~==~--------+--t---t-~~r=+--+--+--+--f-71.70-+-"11=,s-+--+--t--';2,:-.0-j-',;!2,::0l'+-c,cc.O-+'cllcc91c'-+----j--';'5.0c--l~SS;;;l8i'-! • Colll1iondi1gr1ms
f--t-=======-------,-5,"b,-,0,.-,-1 +-~+-s""o-j-~,-+-"'so--+~-J--l,aO-J---,--+~s"'o-j--,1;,-' +-ii:~-ii~-+--=--+~s"'o-t-~',..·' +-;;:~-iio:,+...,2,,'.0-+~:~cc9:,-+-~SO,--j-l,=~~,-l +-,c=:57.~:,,_,-, • Sight di1t1nc11 d11gr1ms
5 Co m lie Draft Traffic Caimi Plan {DTCP
C,l'f' or R1nct"CI PIIOI Veron . $11CTr1t11c Calming Pl■rw
KOACOrporltlon Page1ol3
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
fee Estimate • Rev.2
'1llnl: Gty of Rancho Palol Verdes
f-'---+======~--------t--t--t---+---+---+--+--+--+--+---+---+--+--+--+---+-,--+-----+---+-------< , Draft Final TrafficC,lmin g Pl an (DFTCP)
f----f~~,""="-"'"c"'","''-"';'-..;===----+---"'-f--="-f---''c--+-:','-+--";-+-=+---f--+-'c---l--c~-f---f--+-'c---1--c~-f-~-l-=+-----+--""-+-~=-4 •CC -Approv~Fin11T11fficC1lmin9Plan
l----+============~------+--t--t~~-+-=-+-~-+-=+---+--+---'~-f-C=-+--+--+-~-1-C=-+-~-+-'=-+-----+-=-+-==----< (FTCP)
1 Pro"ectMana .nient
Task. 1.1: P,o·ect Coordin,iion and Admini stra1ion
Tukl.2:Projee1Meetings
• Kickoff Meeting
•ProgrenMtetings
•StakeholderMHtings
• Traffic Safely Committee Meetings DTCP
• hl CityCouncil Mt11ting/Prnen11tion • OFTCP
, .111d o Countrl Neerm /P11ner>101,on FrCP ro tumol} o J sis
Svbto11I O S25
1.5
0/
ts u2s
S293 3.0 S'50
'"' S3 12 S675
3.0 5375 1.0 SUS 1.0 SlOO 1.0 595
,.o U75 15 S173 1.5 1150 1.5 Sl43
OJ SB OJ SU OJ SJO
SO 6 S763 3 S299 S250 3 S247
7.S 5910
12.0 Sl,S83
O.S 178
IO 20.0 570
•Base+Optional
•Mt111i 119A9en d1
•Pruent1tionMateri1l1
•MeetingMinute1
• RupoMe(1)1opo11 -meetin9RFJ1
S200 O.O S200 •Speed ,.d1rcountd1t1
f----f~~==~=""''--------+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-~,~10"'o--+-""o.c-O -+--"1"'10,-0 -, • ADT count d1t1
~==:ff;'.jjtjf'.::~'.::t;'.:~i~j'.j;;'.:;:;::::;:;::;:=====j ===j===j====j ===jt:==j ===j ===:===!=1;::.o=!=s:':;12:;:5 :===:===!=1:.o=!=•:':;100:;::=:::1.o::=::s,:;:5 j==='.::"'.::"===tj:f:=t:::f~~:::0::: : :;:;'::'::::;::n::u::~e:~•photo 1091 and
+--+============-~,.~ .. -•• ~.,+~+~so,-J-~+~soc--1c-,c-l~,.,-j~-+~I0-+--'8';'·0-+~::'c:r:"'5+-~+-~,.-+-'';'0-+-;:~:,--t---',,8·0'-l-;:;;,;~"'5-+-~,"'~~1S0=;50~+-";;;',;+-"~~~;,;,:'-j ob1erv11lon 1ummariH
1--+========~------t--t--t~l~.O-t-!~19~5-+---+--+--+--+-':~:~-+--':~~!~: +---+--+-:--':-+--':~::~l +-~!:~'-+--':~~~~:-+-----+-~l;--';-+-~':~s:~~0---< : ~:~;;;d~:~::::ign warrant 1n1l~es
l--+=======--------+~-t~-+---+-~-+-~-+-~+--+-~+-l~.O-+--'S"'l2~5 +---+-~+-'~·O-+--'S~20~1 +-~2.0'-+--'!~19~1-+-----+-~5~.0-+---'!~51~8-< • Sight dlstilnCe di1 9,1m1 Subtotal SO SO SO SO 2 S250 SO S403 $383 SO lOl S1,0lS
~==:fft'.::~::j~'.::~'.;'.'.::~1'.;::;;:============j===:===:====:===j==l.O=j =,=150=:==;::=:=:=;::::!j:j:~=t:f:j~~t: :===:===t=:~:~=!:f:j~~;:: :=t~:~t::::;:::;E:::j========tiif:;=t :::f~L'.::: =: : ~~:::~e:;~1ct:::::;:::~11rvice
f--+c=.=.a=,===c~"c"""',~'-cc~---+--+--+--+--+-=+-=+-~+-'=-+-1'c.0-+-","'12,-5 +--+--+-1"'.0-+-"1"'100,---t-"'-t-"'"--+----1-,'2,;..0+..;,','22',-5-, vehicles (n required)
1--+,~.,~'4~.5--', ~,.~M~iti~.,~.~c,~u~,--',tim~,~ .. ~, ===~---t--t--t-1-o-t-,-19-5-+---+--+--+--+---'l~.O-+--'S~l2~5 -+---+--+-,~.o-+--',~20~l -+---+---+-----+-~,~.0-+---',~52~1---< • Concaptual Engineering Cost Eulm11e1
Total
Task 1.1: Pio ect Coordin,tion ,nd Adminiwatio n
ll1kl .2:P10JectMutings
•KickoffMeeting
, Progren Mee ling1
•Stakeholde,Meetings
• Traffic SaletyCommittee Meetings DTCP
, ht City Counci l Meeting/Prnentation · onCP
Subtotal
SS21
• 2"d C, Cow ml Mte1mq/PruenIouon FTCP (o riona/J 0 1 $25
Su btotal O $25
Z 01taCot1Ktlon
l 195 150 S98 S 625 904 570 SO 25.0 S:Z.14Z
Sl .092 Sl.27S S398 S3.138 S299 37 U,657 34 U.195
1.5 S22S 3.0 S37 5 1.0 Sll5 1.0 SlOO 1.0 S9S
15 S293 3.0 1450 3.0 S37S l.S S173 15 Sl 50 1.5 SI O
OJ ''° 01 $13 01 512 01 SJO
S312 $675 so 6 $763 3 $299 $250 $247
Sl ,150
so
117.1 S14,7Z3 •BHt• tional
75 S910
12.0 Sl,563
0.5 $78
20.0 $1,570
•Meet jn9Agen d1
•P1tie nt1tionM1teri1l1
•Mee1ing Minutt1
• Re1pon1e(1)topost -m11tingRfls
+---------------------------------------------,occ,,,-:-Mc,•l°"s,-,-m-,-,.,-,,,"'i•""dc""".,.c,,-~~~1:c,:,•'7i:~;--',:'c,-;-1cc;'~,'-~",""\!,-c"-, •T11kt l ·6
Tota l
l Pro ectM•na ement
Tas k l.l : Pro·ect Coordination ilnd Admini stration
Taskl.2 :ProjectMeetings
• Kick.off Meeting
•Progress Meetin gs
• Stakeholder Meetings
• Traffic Safety Committee Me etings DTCP
• h t CityCounci !Meeting/Presentation -DFTCP
S52 1
• 2nd Coty Council Mtelmq/Presenlo/,or, FTCP (op11onal) 0 1 S.?5
Subtot1 I O S2S
Z DetaCol ledion
Sl.092 Sl,275
1.5 S225
15 5293 3.0 1450
S312 S67S
S398 25 S3.1 38 S299 37 S3.657 34 U.195
S375 1.0 SllS 1.0 $100 1.0 S9S
S375 LS Sl73 1.5 1150 1.5 Sl43
OJ S13 01 SI.? 0.1 S10
So 6 S763 3 S299 S250 3 $2.47
5450
so
117.1 $14,023 •81u•Optiooal
7.5 $910
12.0 U,583
0.5 $78
20.0 Sl,570
•Meeting Agenda
•Preunution Mate ri1l s
•Meeting Minutes
• Retponse{s) to post-meeting RFls
>--+'~"~"=·'='"=·="'="=5="'=c~=""=(l=l-------+--+---+---+--t--+--+---+--+---+---+--+--+---+---+--+--+--'="°~--i~O.~O -+---''="°'-! • Spe edrad1roountd111 Tuk 2.2: 24 -Hour ADT Counts (1) SlOO 0.0 SlOO • AOT count dill
1--+'~"s-"='--''C=ol=l•o/~C~~-·1,="'=·•=tin=D<><=•--'•=C=~=lisi=oo=D="'~--+--+---+---+--t--+---+---+--+-~l=.O-+-="~"-,-+--+--+---'l=.O-+-~Sl=OO--+-l~.0-+-,-',,,",-+-~---<~3·~0 -+---'S~320'----< •fitldu1con1Qitsincenotu.pho1olog1and
f--+'~"~"=.4=,0="·~sit"-•""Fiec,ld.=O~b•=•M~O=ion~•='"~d=M•~"~"'='m~,a=U~7S"7"'~°'"7'l-f-~-f-~S0-+-c~-f-7'$0c-/~-+~I0,--+-,,-+~,~0-+~8c-.O-+-:c'~:c,::'c-s+-~t--c!~O-+~',c-·O+-"!!oocc'°c--r--'8c';O-+-i:,ii7~,-S-f--c~~l:"'-,-j-cc;;7:~+-Ucc52'c:~cc0-, observ1tionsummarie1
C,!yo!Rerct"IJPa l0&Ver""·S~Ti,fficClllmingP!al1'
KOAC-ofp0fellon Pege2ol3
DocuSign Envelope ID : A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-8286-198104D51798
Fee E5tjmate • Rey .2
•Turningtemp!1tnforemergencyservjce
~==⇒t;t~~~~t~~~~s~~t~j'.!]~t~[§======~t==~~==~~=;=~~;;.:~::'.'.:::~'.'.'.'.~:::'.'.::~::''.::'.::+:~~+~;;~:::~::::t:t~+=~~~='.::'.::~:'.'.'.'.:~:::::::t:~:t:gg~ ~c:::~:~:ie~~;~~ring Con htimms 1.0 1.0 1100
1.0 S195 1.0 S125 2.0 S201
City of R1rcl'cl Pl!OI Ve-ran • Soc T1tme C.lmlng Pllll'II
KOACOrporetjon
Councilcommen\s
Subtotill
Subtot1I
Subtotal
l
1.0 .,.,. 1.0
195
S195 1.0
1195 1
Sl95 1.0
S195 1.0
13"l 2
Sl,092
Sl.872 27
so 0
Sl95
Sl,170
Sl,170
S2,340 12
S6.747 51
150 ,,. 5
1150 1.0
1150 so 1
mo 1.0
1150 1.0
1300 so 2
Sl.275 $398
S4.0SO so 37
so so 5◄
so so " 1900 18 S2,385 30
1900 so
$1,800 so 12
S7.650 18 S2.385 153
Plgo3or3
625 ' 904
Sl25 ◄.O S◄OO
$125 so S ◄OO
S125 ◄.O S◄OO
Sl25 ◄.O HOO
1250 so • 1800
SJ,138 1299
S4.575
S6.750
Sl,750 so
S3,7SO so
mo so
$1.SOO so
S19,075 "
570
◄.O mo
1380
◄.O 1380
◄.O 1380 • 1760
Sl,482
SS,130
Sl,246
S3.420
S2.280
S4,560
so
so
SS,800
so
so
so
so
120.0 US,422
162-0 S23.080
83.3 S8,609
150.2 $17,049
72 .0 $8,988
138.0 S16,488
S86 .570
51 ,067
•THhl-6
• Bue ♦ Op1iooal
•AIITuks
•AIIProjecu
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B286-198104D51798
01203.0006/695867.1 EQG
EXHIBIT "D
SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
D-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B 104D51798
2141 W. Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 IF: 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
STAFFING
~A
Mr. Stephen Bise will be the project manager of this project. Greg Garces will serve duly as Deputy Project
Manager and the designated person for the City to contact regarding the day-to-day status of the project.
KOA Corporation reserves the right to change the assigned staffing on this project if necessary.
WORK SCHEDULE
KOA will work with the client to maintain a mutually agreeable schedule for the completion of the project.
KOA Corporation envisions a six (6) month schedule from authorization, to the delivery of the Final
Traffic Calming Plans to the client. Incorporation of comments for each study/report can be accomplished
usually within five to eight business days.
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEVCLOPMENT OF SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
City of Rancho Palos Ve1 ·des
Page 30
MC13039
DocuSign Envelope ID: A0AF8BA6-6510-4DC2-B2B6-19B104D51798
2141 W . Orangewood Avenue, Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 I F· 714.573.9534 I www.koacorp.com
MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
AUTHORIZATION
Work will begin upon writing notice to proceed and/or executed service agreement.
Sincerely,
<S:~c:~
Stephen Bise
Vice President I Managing Director
KOA CORPORATION
RANCHO PALOS VERDES -DEV[l.OPMENT or SIX TRAFFIC CALMING PLANS
Cit y of Rancho Palos Verdes
K~A
Page 31
MC13039
Enyssa Momoli
From: Teresa Takaoka
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 9:16 AM
Enyssa Momoli
Subject: FW: June 1, 2021 Council Meeting Consent Calendar Item G
Item G late corr
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel Park <noelparkone@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 20218:46 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>; Ramzi Awwad <rawwad@rpvca.gov>; Ron Dragoo
<RonD@rpvca.gov>
Subject: June 1, 2021 Council Meeting Consent Calendar Item G
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Speaking for the Pacific View Homeowners Association, we strongly support this study and earnestly request that you
approve it.
The issue of speeding on our streets, specifically Locklenna Lane and Verde Ridge Road, has been of great neighborhood
concern for many years. We have raised it repeatedly with City Councils and staff. These streets are very wide and
steeply downhill. Speeding is the natural result. This raises the obvious safety and quality of life issues.
One of our periodic outreaches to City staff took place shortly after the arrival of our new, now Public Works Director,
Mr. Awwad. He very courteously offered to meet with us to observe the streets. When he arrived, we didn't have to say
a word. Based on his extensive previous experience with traffic calming issues, he immediately saw what was
happening. We trotted our our list of suggested fixes, but Mr. Awwad said that we needed to do a professional study so
that any suggested remedies would have professional credibility with the City Council. So that is at least a partial reason
for this proposed study.
Mr. Awwad has worked with us to provide interim solutions pending this definitive study. We appreciate it very much. It
is very impressive to the neighbors to see that the City is working to address this long standing problem, and clearly
reflects well on the image of the City.
Again, we deeply appreciate that our City is addressing this long standing problem. We earnestly request that you
approve this item.
Thank you for your consideration,
Noel Park, President
Pacific View Homeowners Association
6715 El Rodeo Road
Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275
562-413-5147
Sent from my iPhone
1
G.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hi Teri,
Rudy Monroy
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 1:43 PM
Teresa Takaoka
CityClerk
FW: Special Assessment; RPV v. DiSanto
Please see Mr. Kerry Renn correspondence below in regards to her client, Rose Marie Disanto accepting
special assessment for the amount of $22,264.62 for property (13 Cayuse Ln) and will not oppose/contest
special assessment. In light of this, Mr. Kerry Renn will not be appearing in tonight's Jun 1, 2021, City Council
meeting.
Thank you,
Rudy Monroy
Code Enforcement Officer
l: l City of Rancho Palos Verdes
D {310) 544-5296
rmon roy@rpvca.gov
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID-19, visitors are
required to wear face coverings and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. Some employees are working on rotation
and may be working remotely. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the
appropriate department and follow all posted directions during your visit. Walk-ups are limited to one person at a time.
Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff
Directory on the City website.
► GE'ffTON GooglePlay
1
From: Kerry Renn <kerry@kerryrennlaw.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 20214:18 PM
To: Rudy Monroy <rmonroy@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Special Assessment; RPV v. DiSanto
Dear Mr. Monroy,
I am writing to confirm that I have spoken with Rose Marie DiSanto about the City of Rancho Palos Verdes' special
assessment of $22,264.62. Ms. Disanto accepts the special assessment and will not contest it. Her acceptance is based
on the representation that this is RPV's final cost assessment for its code enforcement action against Ms. DiSanto as
described in RPV's Petition for Appointment of Receiver filed against her and the subsequent Abatement Warrant issued
against her. The final cost assessment is based on the assumption that Ms. Disanto will correct all code violations
serving as the basis for the petition and warrant, a small number of which remain outstanding. It is also based on the
assumption that the replacement/repair of the stable will not trigger the need to change the setback requirements for
it.
In light of this, I will not appear at the June 1 City Council meeting at which the special assessment of $22,264.62 will be
voted on by the council members.
If I have misstated our understanding, please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss your concerns.
Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Kerry A. Renn
Kerry A. Renn, Attorney at Law
SO California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 781-9306
kerry@kerryrennlaw.com
This email is covered by the Electronics Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, and is legally privileged. This email
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use,
distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
2
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
LC
Teresa Takaoka
Wednesday, May 26, 2021 5:43 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Recreation and Parks
From: Herb Stark <pt17stearman@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 202111:37 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Recreation and Parks
CAUTION: This emall orl lnated from outside of the CltY. of Rancho Palos Verdes.
For over a month now I have identified several issues relating to the Ladera Linda Park and the
Forrestal Reserve Trails. One of the major problems is the unauthorized trail cut from the upper
parking lot of Ladera Linda Park to Forrestal by the stairs that leads down to the lower soccer
field. This trail has been used by both hikers and soccer players. Recreation and Parks response
was to put up signs and temporary plastic fencing which has not stopped the use of the trail. As of
this morning, 9 am, the Park Range had already caught someone climbing over the fence. Frankly
there needs to be a more substantial fence that cannot be just pushed down.
The other problem is dogs off the leash and dog owners not picking up after their dogs.
Before Recreation and Parks spends $20 million on a new park they need to solve today's
problems. I guess you do not get your name on a plaque or enhance your resume for fixing a fence
or figuring out how to stop the trails from becoming a dog toilet.
Herb Stark
Rancho Palos Verdes
1
5.
2
3
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Banales
Tuesday, May 25, 2021 5:28 PM
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva
CityClerk
FW:
From: Nicole Lauro <thelauros@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 20214:15 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject:
Dear Council Members,
I feel the Ladera Linda Tourist Center isn't a need for Ladera Linda Park, spending anything near 16 million on a
community center in a beautiful and quiet neighborhood is ridiculous.
I feel, if you tear down the old buildings leaving and fixing up the bathrooms and adjacent room for the offices and make
outdoor seating vignettes is all you would need to fix up the area and maintain it's quaint a beautiful location.
1
s.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Karina Banales
Tuesday, May 25, 2021 5:28 PM
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva
CityClerk
FW: Ladera Linda community center
From: Iris Himelwright <idsloan@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 2:48 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Ladera Linda community center
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
What in gods name are you all thinking putting a community center in our neighborhood? You have already ruined
Palos Verdes with your lunatic ideas. And how dare you bus people into the reserve, where they end up roaming
around in our private communities.
Sent from my iPhone
1
5.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Banales
Tuesday, May 25, 2021 5:29 PM
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva
CityClerk
FW: Ladera Linda
From: Matt Stanovich <mattystano15@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 202112:40 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Ladera Linda
Please stop the Ladera Linda project it will be a disaster for our community. Traffic trash. Just look at the beach below
Trump's.
1
Enyssa Momoli
From: Teresa Takaoka
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 11 :53 AM
Enyssa Momoli
Subject: FW: Ladera Linda Park
Late corr item 5
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Bell <dwbrpv@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202111:45 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Ara Mihranian <AraM@rpvca.gov>
Cc: Home Bell <dwbrpv@gmail.com>
Subject: Ladera Linda Park
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I am not happy!
You continue to approve a folly rather than a reasonable {cost and design) Neighborhood Park and Activity Building.
You say you have listened to the concerns of the Local neighborhood. What have you heard?
We wanted a building with compatibly to fit the area and possible future needs of the community. That would require
only a limited number of rooms and minimal change in park grounds compared to your design.
So is listening to us is accepting a building that:
at 252' long is a mere 80' longer than the 172' West Wall of City Hall?
at 252' is longer than the 196' wingspan of a 747-100 Intercontinental plane? You do realize that that plane could
sit on the roof of the proposed design with little overhang of the nose and tail?
at 252' is longer than the 229' length of the Parthenon in Athens?
So listening is accepting a cost estimate of $16 million {estimates are already being increased) that equals $2,388 per
square foot of the 6,700 square foot functional area of the building? This is the real number and I have seen too many
ways staff presents numbers in attempts to deceive your voters. Long ago a City Council decided that the existing
buildings needed replaced. You have agreed to a $16 million project for the replacement that has now morphed to
cover much more than the compact, single story building they may have imagined. I reject the idea that they wanted
something to attract outsiders to the area.
So listening is agreeing to creation of a totally new park, that requires denuding the existing area of most vegetation,
erasing much of the privacy of neighboring homes, and creating a gigantic eyesore in a barely accessible {compared to
other city parks) former school site, drawing more uncontrollable crowds into a congested area, and championing the
design as evidence of a Top Notch City Council submission to a Top Ten List of Los Angeles Area Tourist Attractions?
So listening is accepting a minisculee parking area compared to existing public demand?
1
So listening is allowing a Recreation and Park management free rein that seems incapable of managing anything as
simple as blocking an illegal shortcut path from the existing upper parking lot to Forrestal? Their failures in dealing with
Del Cerro is and has been a fiscal and local neighborhood disaster (you could have been there yesterday afternoon to
see the crowd of cars and people milling around). R&P continues to establish an empire with a growing army of staff,
posts rules that are barely or never enforced, should never have been the RPV staff to manage the park design (it was
Public Works responsibility), and are totally out of touch with local residents?
So listening is proceeding without alleviating the dangerous traffic situation at Forrestal and PVDS? That is cart before
the horse planning.
You are planning to spend millions of unnecessary dollars at Ladera Linda that should more appropriately be spent at a
new city hall, on a funded plan to effectively monitor the Portuguese Bend Slide before it becomes a disaster, or even
spend a minimal amount (comparable to a potential $20 million) to define an approximate cost of a small and more
economic Plan B that could at least give an option for your consideration (simply demo the existing buildings, place a
single story 5000 square foot building on the same area, repave the parking lots and avoid all the $9 million park and
grounds expense you have approved).
I am more than disappointed with the actions of City Council and your willingness to avoid a hard decision to start over.
You are wasting money and are approving something that has little community support.
I an sorry but I can not sign this with respect for your decisions, Don Bell
2
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
McKenzie Bright
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 9:39 AM
sharon yarber
CC; CityClerk
RE: George Gascon
Thank you for this follow-up, Ms. Yarber. It will also be included as late correspondence.
Sincerely,
McKenzie
McKenzie Bright
Administrative Analyst
mbright@rpvca.gov
Phone -(310) 544-5305
0 • . -
' . , __
Cc,nn«:t wtt li th• City f,om vow p """1t o, t<>bfttl
DOWNLOAD 'h'l';f ;, PV
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
I , J ,n ! , ! •• ,.
• AppStore
-1 •• ' ~ • Google P!ay
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Website: www.rpvca.gov
This e-mail message contains information belonging to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privileged, confidential and/or protected from
disclosure . The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named, Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited . If
you received this email in error, or are not an intended rec ipient, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation .
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours . To help prevent the spread of COVID -19, visitors are required
to wear face coverings and adhere to physical distancing guidelines . Some employees are working on rotation and may
be working remotely. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the appropriate
department and follow all posted directions during your visit. Walk -ups are limited to one person at a time. Please note
that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on
the City website .
From: sharon yarber <momofyago@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 9:33 AM
To: McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca.gov>
Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Re: George Gascon
CAUTION: This email orl lnated from outside of the Cit of Rancho Palos Verdes.
I read the letter and agree with its contents. It's a good letter. That said I continue to request that council take a No
Confidence vote as that is much stronger statement of disapproval.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 8:32 AM McKenzie Bright <mBright@rpvca .gov > wrote:
1
~.
Good Morning Ms. Yarber,
Thank you for your email and inquiry. The Mayor and City Council are in receipt of your email relating to the Peninsula
cities' response to District Attorney Gascon. The City Council will be discussing this item at tonight's meeting.
The four Peninsula cities are voting on writing a letter to DA Gascon to provide constructive feedback and express the
City's and Peninsula cities' concerns about the impact of DA Gascon's Special Directives on public safety. Furthermore,
the letter demands that the DA's Office uphold the laws of the state and that no Special Directives be issued which
contradict these laws. The letter is addressed to DA Gascon, and cc's will be sent to the L.A. County Board of
Supervisors and Association of Deputy District Attorneys, among other local and regional partners.
The City of Rolling Hills approved adding their signature to the letter on May 24, the City of Palos Verdes Estates
approved adding their signature to the letter and additionally adopted a vote of no confidence in DA Gascon on May
25. Tonight, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Council will consider adding its signature, as well as adopting a
Victims' Rights Resolution, affirming the City's commitment to the protection of victims' rights.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
McKenzie
G '""-~,,._,.,_._.---------McKenzie Bright G -----------------·--··-·---
Administrative Analyst
mbright@rpvca.gov
Phone -(310) 544-5305
City of Rancho Palos Verdes I G -----------------------, G ----·-------------------1
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
2
Website: www.rpvca.gov
This e-mail message contains information belonging to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privileged, confidential and/or protected from
disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited.
If you received this email in error, or are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID -19, visitors are
required to wear face coverings and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. Some employees are working on rotation
and may be working remotely. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the
appropriate department and follow all posted directions during your visit. Walk -ups are limited to one person at a time .
Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff
Directory on the City website .
From: sharon yarber <momofyago@gmail.com >
Sent: Friday, May 28, 202110:55 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: George Gascon
CAUTION: This email orl lnated from outside of the Cit of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Hi Council,
You indicated at the last council meeting and at the safety presentation last evening that you are preparing a letter re:
Gascon. My question is, to whom are you addressing a letter? Gascon? It would carry SO much more weight if you
would join the other cities that have voted No Confidence in him as we seek to gather signatures on the recall
campaign. Please consider taking such a vote at the next meeting. This is really important.
Thank you!
Sharon Yarber
3
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Karina Banales
Wednesday, May 26, 2021 8:05 PM
CityClerk
FW: Peafowl 2021 Census Report
From: Rudy Monroy <rmonroy@rpvca.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 7:27 PM
To: Carol Mueller <cmuell@verizon.net>
Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: RE: Peafowl 2021 Census Report
Hi Carol,
Good evening and hope all is well. Thank you for your concerns in regards to the City's peafowl population. As
you know on Tuesday June 1, 2021, City Council will be reviewing the 2021 Peafowl Census Report to
consider pausing or reinstating peafowl trapping for 2021. This recommendation is based on the results of the
peafowl census that demonstrates a decrease in population of 35% since the program began in 2015. Of
course, City Council will make the final decision on the future of the program. For any additional questions
please feel free to contact me directly. The following links are to the staff report as well as to information on
how to view and/or participate in the upcoming Council Meeting. Furthermore, if you can please provide me
with location of alleged peafowl feeding so staff can address accordingly. As you may know, feeding any
wildlife is strictly prohibited and subject to administrative citation starting at $2,500. Thank you again for your
interest in the City's peafowl program and stay safe as well.
https://www.rpvca.gov/agendas
https://www.rpvca.gov/participate
Kind regards,
Rudy Monroy
Code Enforcement Officer
t=~~ City of Rancho Palos Verdes
D (310) 544-5296
rmonroy@rpvca.gov
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID-19, visitors are
required to wear face coverings and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. Some employees are working on rotation
and may be working remotely. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the
appropriate department and follow all posted directions during your visit. Walk-ups are limited to one person at a time.
Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff
Directory on the City website.
1
1.
,
" . .
► WITCH GooglePlay
From: Carol Mueller <cmuell@verizon.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 3:21 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Peafowl 2021 Census Report
The peacocks are coming back in numbers ... same house is their gathering point ... have seen the residents feeding the
peacocks.
-----Original Message-----
From: City of Rancho Palos Verdes <listserv@civicplus.com>
To: cmuell@verizon.net
Sent: Wed, May 26, 2021 2:59 pm
Subject: Peafowl 2021 Census Report
View this in your browser
Peafowl 2021 Census Report-June 1st City Council Meeting
The City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes will conduct a hybrid public meeting on Tuesday,
June 1, 2021, at 7:00 PM, to consider the following:
1. Receive and file the 2021 Peafowl Census Report, and
2. Direct Staff to continue pausing the peafowl trapping program for 2021.
Click to view the June 1, 2021 City Council Staff Report
Click here to participate in the upcoming June 1st City Council Meeting.
Inquiries should be directed to Code Enforcement Officer, Rudy Monroy at 310 544-5296 or via email
at rmonroy@rpvca.gov
This message is been sent by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes as part of a "Notify Me" Listserv category you are
signed up for. Please do not press "reply" when responding to this message, it is an unmonitored email
address. You can make changes to your subscription by visiting http://www.rpvca.gov/list.aspx.
2
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to Peafowl on www.rpvca.gov. To unsubscribe, click the
following link:
Unsubscribe
3
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Late corr
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 11 :52 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peafowl Census Report June 1
From: Carol Mueller <cmuell@verizon .net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202111:51 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Peafowl Census Report June 1
CAUTION: This email ori lnated from outside of the Cit of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Until you start fining those who feed them ... you are wasting taxpayer monies. And for those who love them so much,
move to the desert and start a peacock farm so they can live with them 24/7. How about continuing the highest infested
areas ... Vista Grande being the most peacock populated. That should irritate the feeders!
Carol Mueller
1
1 .
Peafowl Census Report June 1
Tonight, June 1, the City Council will review the Peafowl Census Report, an annual count
of peacocks and peahens in RPV neighborhoods . The City Council will also consider
whether to continue to pause the City's humane trapping program in 2021 until a new
census is conducted in 2022 .
The hybrid in -person/virtual meeting will take place at 7 p.m. in McTaggart Hall at Fred
Hesse Jr. Community Park and via Zoom with a very limited number of in-person
attendees and COVID-19 safety protocols in place . Virtual participation is highly
encouraged. The meeting will be live-streamed on the City website and televised on
RPVtv Cox 33/Frontier FiOS 38.
A staff report for this topic is available on the City website . Please submit your
comments to the City Council in advance of the meeting by emailing them
to cc@rpvca.gov . If you would like to provide comments during the meeting or leave a
pre-recorded voice message, please complete a form at rpvca.gov/participate .
For some background, the City implemented a periodic humane peafowl trapping and
relocation program in 2015 in response to complaints from residents about the growing
peafowl population and associated impacts (noise , property damage, etc.). It is not the
City's intent to eradicate the peafowl population, but to manage the population at levels
2
identified in 2000 and to educate the public on how to coexist with the birds. This is all in
an effort to strike a balance between differing opinions in the City.
Every year, the City Council receives a report on the past year's trapping program (if
trapping was conducted), as well as a census report for the current year's peafowl
population, to determine whether or not to resume trapping . Trapped peafowl are
relocated off the Palos Verdes Peninsu la to homes that have been screened by the
trapping vendor and reviewed by the City to ensure the individuals adopting the peafowl
have some avian experience and have adequate space for peafowl to roam freely. Under
no circumstances will the trapped peafowl be euthanized or treated inhumanely.
For more information about the City's Peafowl Management Plan, visit rpvca.gov/peafowl ,
and for updates, sign up for the Peafowl listserv at rpvca.gov/notify .
If you are a person with a disability and need an accommodation to participate in
programs , services , activities and meetings, contact the City's ADA Coordinator/Risk
Manager at 310 -683-3157 , adare uests r vca. ov , 30940 Hawthorne Blvd ., Rancho
Palos Verdes , CA 90275 , at least 48 hours in advance to request an auxiliary aid or
accommodation .
O s hare on Face book D share on Twitter
Copyright 2019 Rancho Palos Verdes . All Rights Reserved .
30940 Hawthorne Blvd , Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
If you no longer wish to receive emails from us, you may Unsubscribe .
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser .
3
D share via Email
Powered bv
Enyssa Momoli
To: Teresa Takaoka
Subject: RE: Peafowl trapping -NO, Please don't
From: Rudy Monroy <rmonroy@rpvca.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 5:39 PM
To: 2natalie@cox.net
Cc: Ken Rukavina <krukavina@rpvca.gov>; Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: RE: Peafowl trapping -NO, Please don't
Hi Natalie,
Good afternoon and thank you for your concerns in regards to the City's peafowl population. As you know on
Tuesday June 1, 2021, City Council will be reviewing the 2021 Peafowl Census Report to consider pausing or
reinstating peafowl trapping for 2021. This recommendation is based on the results of the peafowl census that
demonstrates a decrease in population of 35% since the program began in 2015. Of course, City Council will
make the final decision on the future of the program. For any additional questions please feel free to contact
me directly. The following links are to the staff report as well as to information on how to view and/or participate
in the upcoming Council Meeting.
https://www.rpvca.gov/agendas
https://www.rpvca.gov/participate
Kind regards,
Rudy Monroy
Code Enforcement Officer
t:.'~~ City of Rancho Palos Verdes
D {310) 544-5296
rmon roy@rpvca.gov
City Hall is open to the public during regular business hours. To help prevent the spread of COVID-19, visitors are
required to wear face coverings and adhere to physical distancing guidelines. Some employees are working on rotation
and may be working remotely. If you need to visit City Hall, please schedule an appointment in advance by calling the
appropriate department and follow all posted directions during your visit. Walk-ups are limited to one person at a time.
Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff
Directory on the City website.
1
{,
► GE:TITON Google Play
From: Natalie <2natalie@cox.net>
Date: May 28, 2021 at 4:11:40 PM PDT
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl trapping -NO, Please don't
Dear City Council,
Please do not continue the trapping of the peacocks and peahens. They are the icons of RPV! I was
happy to read that the recommendation is to suspend the trapping program for 2021 unless you get
additional residents requesting the removal of the birds.
There are many of us who LOVE our peafowl. I urge to to listen to those of us who do not, I repeat, DO
NOT want the birds trapped and removed.
Please SAVE OUR BEAUTIFUL BIRDS!
Thank you,
Natalie Massey
6953 Beechfield Dr
RPV, CA 90275
(310) 377-1734
2
Enyssa Momoli
From: Karina Banales
Sent:
To:
Thursday, May 27, 2021 8:24 AM
CityClerk
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
From: Karina Banales
FW: Peacocks
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 8:24 AM
To: Rudy Monroy <rmonroy@rpvca.gov>
Cc: Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov>; Ken Rukavina <krukavina@rpvca.gov>
Subject: FW: Peacocks
-----Original Message-----
From: Gail Taylor <gtaylor0122@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 20218:23 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacocks
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
It is my view that we should resume catching peacocks in RPV. I see far too many in my neighborhood. The other day I
had 7 in my front yard. This morning, there were three walking down the street and others in the neighborhood.
GailTaylor
6924 Clovercliff Dr., RPV
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Karina Banales
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 9:17 AM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Peacocks
From: Joe & Bea Marino <jandbmarino@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 9:13 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacocks
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
City Counsel
To Whom It May Concern:
We are writing to urge you not to continue the trapping and removing of our peacocks. We live in RPV and before these
beautiful animals were removed, it was a pleasure to see them in our neighborhood. The neighborhood children were
especially interested in them, fostering an interest in the importance of living with and adapting to wildlife. We have not
had any peacocks in several years! Very sad! Very important is that the population is down and there doesn't seem to be
a need to continue this "peacock control."
Please vote to suspend peacock trapping.
Joe & Beatrice Marino
1
l.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Bafia/es
Deputy City Manager
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5203
kbanales@rpvca.gov
Karina Banales
Friday, May 28, 2021 4:36 PM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
Fwd: Peafowl in RPV
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services
are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotation and may
be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone
numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Marianne Hunter <2hunter@cox.net>
Date: May 28, 2021 at 3:38:59 PM PDT
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Re: Peafowl in RPV
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Dear City Council,
We've lived in RPV for almost 24 years. We do not support trapping peafowl. The population has not
grown, judging by our observations.
Please do not renew peafowl trapping.
Thank you,
Marianne Hunter
1 Cinnamon In
RPV 90275.
Sent from my iPhone
1
Enyssa Momoli
From: Karina Banales
Sent:
To:
Friday, May 28, 2021 4:38 PM
CityClerk
Subject:
Karina Banales
Deputy City Manager
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5203
kbanales@rpvca.gov
Fwd: Peafowl
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COV/0-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services
are available by telephone, email, on line and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotation and may
be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone
numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Karina Banales <kbanales@rpvca.gov>
Date: May 28, 2021 at 4:35:11 PM PDT
To: Rudy Monroy <rmonroy@rpvca.gov>
Cc: Ken Rukavina <krukavina@rpvca.gov>, Octavio Silva <OctavioS@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Peafowl
Karina Banales
Deputy City Manager
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5203
kba nales@rpvca.gov
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COV/0-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the
public, but services are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some
employees are working on rotation and may be working remotely. Please note that our response to your
1
inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City
website.
Begin forwarded message:
From: waiter rosskopf <captaincloaca5@gmail.com>
Date: May 28, 2021 at 3:39:56 PM PDT
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
We love the Peafowl. Their numbers are still diminished. Please don't start trapping
them again. Thank you, Dr Walter Rosskopf, Los Verdes resident for 50 plus years.
Sent from my iPad
2
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Karina Banales
Saturday, May 29, 2021 2:41 PM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Peafowl RHE support
From: Lisa Green <urayness@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 202112:04 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl RHE support
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Good morning,
I just want to take some time to voice my opinion On the preservation of the PFL roaming wild in our area.
As a Rolling Hills resident & tac payer and lifelong Palos Verdes resident.
We need to preserve and not trap our beautiful peafowl! They are an asset to our beautiful Peninsula & it's
communities. Educate those who do not appreciate/want the peafowl on how to safely keep them away from their
properties so that the others who do embrace them can enjoy them. The city of Arcadia has a well received plan I
understand. 9
Cheers,
Lisa Green
Excuse any typos ... sent from my iPhone
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Banales
Saturday, May 29, 2021 2:42 PM
Rudy Monroy
CityClerk; Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva
FW: Please DO NOT trap the peafowl
From: Yvonne Schreiner <yvonne@schreiner.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 202110:52 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Please DO NOT trap the peafowl
I am an RPV resident and our household is AGAINTS TRAPPING THE PEAFOWL. Sadly, there has been a
significant decrease of these beautiful animals in my area.
Thank you,
Yvonne and Tony Schreiner
Sent frorn my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy srnartphone
1
l.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Bafia/es
Deputy City Manager
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5203
kbanales@rpvca.gov
Karina Banales
Monday, May 31, 2021 8:25 AM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
Fwd: Pis do NOT trap any peafowls this year.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services
are available by telephone, email, on line and I imited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotation and may
be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone
numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
Begin forwarded message:
From: arundhati01@yahoo.com
Date: May 30, 2021 at 10:44:13 PM PDT
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Pis do NOT trap any peafowls this year.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
I would like to request the council to not trap any peafowls this year {2021) r/1 .
Thank u
Regards,
Aru Tamhane
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Banales
Monday, May 31, 2021 8:46 PM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Peacocks
From: E E <1amadeline4me@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 8:45 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacocks
To whom it may concern,
I'm just writing to say thank you for pausing the peacock trapping last year. I hope you will continue to put it on pause
this year also.
Thank you,
Dr. Econom
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Banales
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:35 AM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Peafowl
From: Corinne <argentat@att.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:31 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl
Dear RPV City Council:
Please do not trap the peafowl. They are beautiful birds and characteristic of the PV Peninsula. A few complaints about
their callings and waste do not merit trapping and taking away these beautiful animals from the Peninsula.
Thank you,
Corinne Cortes
10 Sycamore
RHE
1
1.
Enyssa Momoli
From: Karina Banales
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:36 AM
Rudy Monroy
Cc:
Subject:
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Peafowl Management Program
From: Val B <theatreuro@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 6:15 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl Management Program
Hello,
I hope you all had a wonderful Memorial Day weekend. As one of your constituents, I wanted to contact you to request
that you do not resume trapping this year. The population is well within a reasonable amount and it has been nice
seeing them around a little bit more.
Thank you for your consideration on this matter,
Valerie Berg
1
7,
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Karina Banales
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:37 AM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Peacocks
From: Denise <DVroom0000@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 20211:00 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacocks
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Please do not do anymore trapping of the peacocks. Too many have already been taken away from their home.
Thank you,
Denise Vroom
Sent from my iPad
1
l.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Banales
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:45 AM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Please do not trap the peacocks
From: Khoi Le <vietkhoi@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:45 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Please do not trap the peacocks
Hi
I am a resident of RPV, and really enjoy having the peacocks around. I don't mind the pooping, the noise, or the
occasional damages they do. Its part of nature, one of the precious things we have up here in RPV. Please do not
resume trapping these beautiful creatures; me, my family and my neighbors do enjoy having them around.
Thank you
Khoi
1
1.
Enyssa Momoli
From: Karina Banales
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:57 AM
Rudy Monroy
Cc:
Subject:
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Please do not trap the peacocks
From: Khoi Le <vietkhoi@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:51 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Re: Please do not trap the peacocks
Hi
To follow-up and clarify, these beautiful creatures didn't do any real damages, only superficial ones .. and only
extremely rarely. I don't want my reference to damages to be use for trapping these birds. Please let them
be and don't resume trapping, their numbers is already low.
Thanks again
Khoi
From: Khoi Le
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:44:50 AM
To: cc@rpvca.gov <cc@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Please do not trap the peacocks
Hi
I am a resident of RPV, and really enjoy having the peacocks around. I don't mind the pooping, the noise, or the
occasional damages they do. Its part of nature, one of the precious things we have up here in RPV. Please do not
resume trapping these beautiful creatures; me, my family and my neighbors do enjoy having them around.
Thank you
Khoi
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Origin a I Message-----
Karina Banales
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 8:05 AM
Rudy Monroy
Ken Rukavina; Octavio Silva; CityClerk
FW: Stop Peafowl Trapping
From: Yolanda Rosiak <stricyo@icloud.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 4:02 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Stop Peafowl Trapping
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Just want to send an email letting you all know that watching the peacocks, peahens and baby chicks this year has been
such a pleasure. It has always been a pleasure to see them and so darn sad when they are trapped and taken away. After
a year of Covid and being quarantined in our homes there is nothing like going out doors and seeing the beauty of these
animals roaming freely through our yards.
Please do not vote to trap these birds again.
Thank you,
Yoli Rosiak
Sent from my iPhone
1
l.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 11 :27 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: peacocks
From: Merry An Sybilrud <merrmm@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202111:27 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: peacocks
Unfortunately, the number of peacocks has gotten out of hand. Please relocate them if you
can. Thank you, Merry An Cejka
1
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 11 :44 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peacock trapping
From: Susan Gates <lomitaloon@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202111:42 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacock trapping
We would like to ask that you continue the trapping of the peacocks in the area of bronco and surrounding
neighborhood. As you know we have people feeding the peacocks which had made for a favorable area for them to raise
their young. The population has grown in our area. They are very vocal after dark which has disrupted our sleep nightly.
Thank you
Ken and Susan Gates
17 Surrey lane
310 339 8369
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 12:22 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Pause on Peafowl Trapping
From: Marcia Luce <marcia_luce@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202112:07 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Pause on Peafowl Trapping
Hi.
This month, I will have been a resident of Rancho Palos Verdes for 8 years. I wanted to write to implore that you once
again pause the peafowl trapping. I live on Sunnyside Ridge Road, where a number of peafowl reside, so I can say that I've
experienced the perceived noise, poop, etc. on a daily basis. However, I have also experienced their extreme beauty, their
personalities, and their interactions with each other that add to the charm and uniqueness of this special area I'm proud
to call home. Although not native to this peninsula, the peafowl have predated most of the residents on the hill. When we
were buying our house, we needed to sign a disclosure rider saying we were aware of the peafowl, and we had no
problems with them. I love seeing the mothers watch over their new chicks. A few months after I first moved here,
someone had hit a peacock with their car, and he was sitting in the middle of the road with a bent tail. There was another
peacock with him who would not leave his side. (He did move out of the road after a while and later he was gone;
hopefully, he survived.) One can tell that the peafowl obviously interact well with each other and separating them would
be cruel. On our street, the people most affected by the peafowl living on their properties have no problem with them
being there. (In the past, I've spoken to them about this during our neighborhood socials.) Please continue to keep this
area rurally distinctive and pause trapping for at least an additional year.
Sincerely,
Marcia Luce
310-831-2130
1
1.
Enyssa Momoli
From: Teresa Takaoka
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 12:22 PM
Enyssa Momoli
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
-----Original Message-----
FW: Peafowl Comment
Follow up
Flagged
From: CHRIS ENGEN <ce35@mac.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202112:04 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl Comment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
PLEASE continue the trapping and removal program in the Headland Drive/ Sunnyside Ridge area.
We live at 73 Headland Drive and they are a serious nuisance. It is not uncommon to see 8-10 in front of our house. 2-3
up on the roof. Loud crowing late at night and early morning.
Our population seems larger than ever.
Thank you.
Chris Engen
1
Enyssa Momoli
From: Teresa Takaoka
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 12:24 PM
Enyssa Momoli
Subject: FW: Peacocks
From: Michael Diehl <michaelldiehl@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202112:23 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacocks
In the Los Verdes area, We have a HUGE flock at Trailriders and Monera, the numbers have grown a considerable
amount this year.
I live on Briarhurst Dr, and see the the flocks has moved to roost onto Purple Ridge, Geronimo, and Abbotswood. Not
trapping this year grew the flock by about 30%. We are not to the critical mass of the 2007 type years prior to trapping,
but I personally would like to see the flock trimmed down. The more the roost into more locations, the more
challenging it will be later to solve.
Please bring back the trapping controls this year.
Thank you,
Michael Diehl
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 12:37 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Trapping of the peafowl
From: Tracy Georgis <tracynp@icloud.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202112:35 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Trapping of the peafowl
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Good afternoon,
Please consider not trapping the peafowl for another year.
As a long-time RPV resident, I consider them a signature feature of our city.
Sincerely,
Tracy Georgis
858-525-1580
Sent from my iPhone
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 12:40 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peafowl Census
From: Susan Anderson <searka310@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202112:39 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl Census
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Dear Board Members,
Please continue to take a bird census AND fund peafowl trapping. The census is up again in my neighborhood
(Ridgecrest). In fact, eight were spotted on my roof in the early evening within the last few weeks.
Thank you,
Susan Anderson
Ridgecrest area resident
Sent from my iPad
1
7 ..
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 12:47 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peacocks
From: Amber Newsom <amber@f9group.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202112:43 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peacocks
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
These animals are just one of the many treasures our beloved hill has to offer ... Please don't remove them ... { plus they
eat rattle snakes ... could you all imagine all the snakes you would all have if you got rid of them) ...
Sent from my iPhone
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 1 :03 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Status of peafowl and other varmints in not just Portuguese Bend. Hazing
limitationsRe: Peafowl Census Report June 1
From: SUNSHINE <sunshinerpv@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 202112:55 PM
To: Rudy Monroy <rmonroy@rpvca.gov>
Cc: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; CityClerk <CityClerk@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Status of peafowl and other varmints in not just Portuguese Bend. Hazing limitationsRe: Peafowl Census Report
June 1
Hi Rudy,
Found it. The email address of the County's "animal care" person I spoke with back in April is:
pwebb@animalcare.lacounty.gov
This is the person who said I could be cited or even incarcerated, for throwing rocks at any
wildlife. Air propelled projectiles are what got the authorities to show up at my doorstep.
The Staff Report for Council's consideration for Tuesday June 1 is recommending "continue pausing",
"encouraging" public education and deterrent measures. The "census" is a waste of money as in, not
at all accurate. Let me know if you want more details about that.
Given that some people like destructive and irritating non-native wildlife and some people don't, I
think that the City's peafowl trapping program is a great compromise. It took only two weeks to
remove 18 peafowl from the garden next to my patio. Since then, my veggies still have to be
wrapped in chicken wire but the 24/7 screaming is now only in the distance. I use a child's air pump
BB gun to haze any newcomers when they try to roost in my big tree. Each year, a few of the next
generation needs to be "educated" but mostly, the screech from opening my sliding screen door is
enough to remind them that they are not welcome.
1
1.
Raven, ground squirrel and cotton-tail rabbit populations continue to explode producing progressively
more damage to other birds, slope integrity and plants, respectively. These particular squirrels
appeared only between five and 10 years ago. Coyotes, rats and rattlesnakes appear to populate
according to their food supply in an ongoing cycle. I have mentioned before that I see the coyotes
coming closer to people's homes because that is where these tasty squirrels have taken up
housekeeping.
All that leaves is what "deterrent measures" may not be applied by the offended residents. Please let
me know what our Mr. P. Webb, CA Fish and Wildlife and the City Codes can agree upon via an
"education" piece for the public. That is in your budget, right?
Thank you for any clarification you can provide .... S 310-377-8761
PS: Please cover all the "varmints" if there are differences in what may be done to keep them off of
one's property. The Fish and Wildlife man said that it was reported that someone on my property was
seen shooting crows. There are no crows around here.
In a message dated 6/1/202111:23:29 AM Pacific Standard Time, listserv@civicplus.com writes:
2
Peafowl Census Report June 1
Tonight, June 1, the City Council will review the Peafowl Census Report, an annual count
of peacocks and peahens in RPV neighborhoods. The City Council will also consider
whether to continue to pause the City's humane trapping program in 2021 until a new
census is conducted in 2022.
The hybrid in-person/virtual meeting will take place at 7 p.m. in McTaggart Hall at Fred
Hesse Jr. Community Park and via Zoom with a very limited number of in-person
attendees and COVID-19 safety protocols in place. Virtual participation is highly
encouraged. The meeting will be live-streamed on the City website and televised on
RPVtv Cox 33/Frontier FiOS 38.
A staff report for this topic is available on the City website. Please submit your
comments to the City Council in advance of the meeting by emailing them
to cc@rpvca.gov . If you would like to provide comments during the meeting or leave a
pre-recorded voice message, please complete a form at rpvca.gov/participate .
For some background, the City implemented a periodic humane peafowl trapping and
relocation program in 2015 in response to complaints from residents about the growing
peafowl population and associated impacts (noise, property damage, etc.). It is not the
City's intent to eradicate the peafowl population, but to manage the population at levels
3
identified in 2000 and to educate the public on how to coexist with the birds. This is all in
an effort to strike a balance between differing opinions in the City.
Every year, the City Council receives a report on the past year's trapping program (if
trapping was conducted), as well as a census report for the current year's peafowl
population, to determine whether or not to resume trapping. Trapped peafowl are
relocated off the Palos Verdes Peninsula to homes that have been screened by the
trapping vendor and reviewed by the City to ensure the individuals adopting the peafowl
have some avian experience and have adequate space for peafowl to roam freely. Under
no circumstances will the trapped peafowl be euthanized or treated inhumanely.
For more information about the City's Peafowl Management Plan, visit rpvca.gov/peafowl
, and for updates, sign up for the Peafowl listserv at rpvca.gov/notify .
If you are a person with a disability and need an accommodation to participate in
programs, services, activities and meetings, contact the City's ADA Coordinator/Risk
Manager at 310-683-3157, adare uests r vca. ov, 30940 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho
Palos Verdes, CA 90275, at least 48 hours in advance to request an auxiliary aid or
accommodation.
Os hare on F acebook Dshare on Twitter
Copyright 2019 Rancho Palos Verdes. All Rights Reserved.
30940 Hawthorne Blvd, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Email not displaying correctly?
4
Dshare via Email
Powered by
Enyssa Momoli
From: Teresa Takaoka
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 1 :06 PM
Enyssa Momoli
Subject: FW: Please stop trapping Peacocks and Peahens
-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Snell <ksnell0001@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 20211:05 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Please stop trapping Peacocks and Peahens
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons,
It is sad to say that the Peafowl's population has greatly diminished. When I moved to my four acre parcel in 1973, I
counted about 48 Peafowl on my property at one time. Now there might be one or two Peafowl that visit.
During the original hearings that the City of RPV had which ordered the trapping of Peafowl, there was no discussion of
the trapping to continue. Perhaps it is time to stop and not review.
Please consider the damage that the Urban Coyote do versus the damage that Peafowl do. Why not spend your
resources on controlling the Coyotes before something horrible happens? Why not spend your resources on weed
abatement in the Preserve?
Thank you,
Kathy Snell
8 Vanderlip Drive
Rancho Palos Verdes, Ca 90275
1
1.
Enyssa Momoli
From: Teresa Takaoka
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 1:12 PM
Enyssa Momoli
Subject: FW: Peafowl
From: Laurie <greenpeeps5@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 20211:12 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl
To City Council -
I am NOT in favor of trapping peafowl this year. There are already few left on the hill. In my area in
Los Verdes, I have exactly one full grown male, and a young male and a couple of females.
These birds are one of the reasons I love this neighborhood. It makes us a charming place to live and
brings up the property values. They have done no damage to my property. I got a new roof 8 years
ago. When I had a leak a year ago and called a roofer out, he said it was due to a nail in the skylight,
and the roof looked brand new. And that is with peafowl occasionally walking on it.
Their feces is much easier to clean than any other animal. You spray it off with a hose. They call each
other at night, but to me, after all these years, it is a relaxing sound.
Why allow new people to move into our neighborhood and the peafowl's neighborhood and try to
change it. They can move elsewhere and leave it for people who love it up here.
Please leave them ALONE and work on things that need to be worked on, including people spreading
hatred of human beings!
Laurie O'Brien
6908 Willowtree Dr.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
1
1.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 20211:47 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: 6/1 Meeting -Peafowl Census
From: Steve King <sking842@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 20211:46 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: 6/1 Meeting -Peafowl Census
Hello City Council,
I just learned of the meeting tonight and do not think I will be able to join, but I wanted to submit my opinion/request
which is to end the pause and restart the trapping program ASAP.
We live in the Stonegate neighborhood, backed up to Sunnyside. Our property (28032 PV Dr E) is overrun with
peacocks. We appreciate them, but the population has exploded over the past 3-4 years. They pick apart our irrigation
systems which has been costly to fix and they cover all of our porches with waste since the males tend to display there.
We have hosted a trap the past two years and would be happy to do so again.
Thank you for your consideration.
Steve King
28032 Palos Verdes Dr E
310.463.4116
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 2:09 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peafowl
From: Terry T Gladfelter <jpglad@cox.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 2:01 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Please consider not initiating the program to relocate the Peafowl in RPV until a new count for 2021/2022 has been
completed.
Terry & Joanne Gladfelter
Sent from my iPad
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 2:35 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peafowl ---stop all trapping
From: DOTTIE HASHIZUMI <dottiehash@cox.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 2:33 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl ---stop all trapping
My name is Dottie Lancaster Hashizumi & purchased Del Cerro home when it was 5136 Coveview Drive,
Palos Verdes Peninsula 90274.
Then we became part of the new City of Rancho Palos Verdes and our address numbers became 22
Coveview Drive, RPV with the new zip code of 90275.
We had to learn to adapt to all this nature and beauty, to peafowl, we had skunks, we had possums, we
had raccoons, we had owls. The owls are coming back & I have seen 3 squirrels at one time in my yard the
last few months. And I've seen quite a few snakes
I saw the last peafowl in 2004. The last raccoon was in 2014, and years since a possum or skunk. But I
have seen coyotes and I know they must eat.
At this moment, I wish to thank the Mayor & City Council for trying so hard to keeping my view of hikers
and their cars at a minimum.
I worked in Pasadena & Arcadia area for many years. They live with & love their peafowl. They have a
brochure realtors pass out to potential home buyers. Let's become more "animal" positive. Let us
remember they kill rattlesnakes & are part of the beauty of our Peninsula .. Let's learn the deterrents
like cayenne pepper or freshly ground black pepper, mothballs, they dislike dogs, water spraying or
automatic sprinklers. Let's stop trapping, or threatening to start up again. Peafowl have been here on
the Peninsula far longer than any of us.
Yes, I'm a septuagenarian and love the Peninsula. I do not understand folks who buy near a horse trail or
neighborhood where it "smells like horses" or folks that hate the peafowls cries. Let's require real
estate folks to tell folks about things they may not have thought about. Sometimes I get annoyed when
new neighbors move in & their children are screaming for hours while having fun (maybe I've just gotten
old, or more likely it's that I'm jealous of their energy),but it's life and one learns to adapt. Why not
put a few peafowl in our Portuguese Bend Preserve ........ wouldn't hurt for them to kill some rattlers plus,
1
1.
I'm sure many hikers have never seen one unless on TV or in the zoo. I would love to hear their cries and
view their beauty again ...... 17 years without is a long time, but I do remember so very fondly the 31
years of having peafowl and proud to tell my visitors that's not a baby crying, those are peafowl.
Thank you for all you do for our City & trying to make us all happy.
Dottie Lancaster Hashizumi
2
Enyssa Momoli
From: Teresa Takaoka
Sent:
To:
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 2:41 PM
Enyssa Momoli
Subject: FW: concerning peafowl
-----Original Message-----
From: From Cox <rhoanne@cox.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 2:40 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: concerning peafowl
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
It is my hope that you will continue humane peafowl trapping.
My neighbor at# 9 Cayuse has 7-9 males roosting in her pine tree every morning.
Each male seems to have a number of female companions. The hens generally have 3 chicks following them about.
The babies are adorable, peahens are incredible moms and the males are an amazing thing of beauty. BUT ....
Oh my goodness, I can't hear myself think at dusk. I feel like I live in Jurassic Park.
We are all woken up daily at 3-4 am with a variety of very loud calls among our feathered neighbors.
My deck is covered with piles of poop and my garden has concavities shaped like peacocks.
My neighborhood falls under the Sunnyside Ridge tract, which has had an increase in it's peafowl population.
You have permission to trap in my backyard. I have offered in the past but gotten no response.
Thank you for your consideration,
Rhoanne Washington
#3 Cayuse Lane, RPV
1
{,
Enyssa Momoli
From: Elizabeth Sala <etsala@live.com>
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 3:29 PM
CityClerk
Sent:
To:
Subject: Peafowl Census Report -CONTINUE Trapping Program
Dear City Council,
The Staff Report on the recent peafowl census show the following increases between 2020 to 2021 in these
neighborhoods:
• Sunnyside Ridge area -42% INCREASE
• Vista Grande area -120% INCREEASE
• Portuguese Bend -25% INCREASE
The Staff report also lists the goal of the adopted Peafowl Management Program as 134 birds. The current census
counted 181 birds which represents a 35% INCREASE from the agreed upon goal.
Please continue with the peafowl trapping program! These animals are still a problem for many of us residents!
Thank you,
Elizabeth Sala
Martingale Drive
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 3:39 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: For Peafowl hearing (video)
Video.mov
From: Marianne Hunter <2hunter@cox.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 3:35 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>; Rudy Monroy <rmonroy@rpvca.gov>
Subject: For Peafowl hearing (video)
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Hello Council, my neighbors on Nextdoor have requested I forward to you this video from my property. If shows a hen
with 2 one day old chicks.
Aside from how cute they are, it's notable that she only has two chicks. Generally they hatch 3-5.
It's also seems rather late in the year for hatching.
We enjoy our wildlife, native and in this case, non-native!
Sent from my iPhone
1
l.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 4:00 PM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Peafowl in RPV
From: jockoplotz@gmail.com <jockoplotz@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 3:59 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Peafowl in RPV
Hello all,
I want to support letting these birds be part of RPV. They are an important part of our city's history and identity and
should not be restricted or trapped.
I admit that they sometimes eat a flower or poop on the sidewalk. At some times of the year, they can call at night.
This is a minor inconvenience and they should be left alone. They are a rare beautiful bird that should be treasured.
People that live by airports must expect noise. People that live in the desert must expect heat. People in RPV must
expect peafowl. They come with the neighborhood.
What is next? I don't like horses, so should we get rid of all the horses? They poop on the ground and make noise. No,
horses are part of the charm of the city and if people don't like them, they are free to move.
The wild parrots we have in the neighborhood now make a lot of noise, but I love them and feel blessed to watch these
beautiful birds circle our house. How blessed we all are to have these exotic birds in the neighborhood!
Peafowl already have a hard life between the dogs, cars, and coyotes. What is the survival rate after the city traps these
birds?
If the city wants to continue to trap them, they should remove the peacock emblem from all the city trucks and logos,
and websites. If the city choses to be hostile to peafowl, lets not be hypocrites.
I encourage you to spend the city's money somewhere else that will make life better for the residents and not use the
money to erase an important part of the city's identity and history. Mr Vanderlip would not be amused.
I would tell you what street we live on, but I am afraid you would come and trap the beautiful peafowl family.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Mr. Jordan
1
l.
Enyssa Momoli
From: Matt Waters
Sent:
To:
Thursday, May 27, 2021 1:25 PM
rodjensen@me.com
Cc:
Subject:
CC; Cory Linder; Daniel Trautner; CityClerk
FW: Honoring Ken Dyda
Dear Mr. Jensen,
Thank you for your email regarding the June 1 City Council Meeting item regarding
consideration of naming a potential City facility in honor of Councilmember Ken
Dyda. Your email will be added as late correspondence to City Council.
Below is a link to the June 1 Staff Report:
June 1, 2021 Staff Report: Consideration of naming a potential City facility to be
named in honor of Councilmember Ken Dyda
Sincerely,
Matt Waters
Senior Administrative Analyst
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Recreation and Parks Department
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
www.rpvca.gov
mattw@rpvca.gov -(310) 544-5218 p
Begin forwarded message:
From: "John R. (Rod) Jensen" <jrodjensen@me.com>
Date: May 27, 2021 at 1:17:50 PM PDT
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Honoring Ken Dyda
1
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Not to be disrespectful but in my opinion please find another way to honor Ken Dyda other than to
rename PVIC.
53 year resident
John R (Rod) Jensen
21 Barkentine Road RPV
Sent from my iPad
2
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Yvetta Williams <yvetta2@gmail.com>
Friday, May 21, 2021 1 :58 PM
CityClerk; CityClerk
naming buildings after politicians!!!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
No,no,NO building should not ever be named after ANY CITY POLITICIAN OR EMPLOYEE!
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Karina Banales
Wednesday, May 26, 2021 6:47 PM
Cory Linder; Matt Waters; Daniel Trautner
CityClerk
FW: Naming buildings after politicians in RPV
From: Yvetta Williams <yvetta2@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 6:25 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Naming buildings after politicians in RPV
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
I am against naming any building after politicians.
We have many beautiful names for beautiful Rancho Palos Verdes. PLEASE do not name any building after any
politician. Thank you. Yvetta Williams
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 10:13 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: please do not name any rpv building or park after Any politician or employee! too
many already named after people! A Beautiful area that should have beautiful
descriptive names!!!!
From: Yvetta Williams <yvetta2@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 4:43 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: please do not name any rpv building or park after Any politician or employee! too many already named after
people! A Beautiful area that should have beautiful descriptive names I! I!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Banales
Wednesday, May 26, 2021 11 :54 AM
Cory Linder; Daniel Trautner; Matt Waters
CityClerk
FW: Ken Dyda recognition
From: J Barry <itsthebarrys@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 202111:30 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Ken Dyda recognition
Respected Council members:
It would be my pleasure to suggest naming RPV City Hall after present council member Ken Dyda. I have known Ken for
many years, and greatly admire him for all that he has done for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. I first met him in 1973,
when he was working diligently to incorporate this great city, and have followed his civic and volunteer career all these
years. I have supported him in elections, and know his volunteer works at our church. I admire him as a wonderful
family man, church member, and civic volunteer. His number of service hours and love of this city is unmatched! As a
founding father who worked so diligently to incorporate RPV, I cannot imagine any other person who deserves the
honor of having City Hall named in his honor more than Ken Dyda.
Respectfully Yours,
Joan Barry
310 525-6721
itsthebarrys@gmail.com
1
\0.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Karina Bafia/es
Deputy City Manager
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5203
kba na les@rpvca.gov
Karina Banales
Wednesday, May 26, 2021 1 :03 PM
Cory Linder; Matt Waters; Daniel Trautner
CityClerk
Fwd: renaming a City facility after Ken Dyda
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services
are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotation and may
be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone
numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bob Cash <bcash116@gmail.com>
Date: May 26, 2021 at 12:41:17 PM PDT
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: renaming a City facility after Ken Dyda
Ken is well deserving, a lifetime of service to the
community.
Bob Cash
RPV resident since 1967.
1
\O ·
Teresa Takaoka
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
WILLIAM PARKER <n8312p@msn.com>
Wednesday, May 26, 2021 12:33 PM
cc
Renaming of a City Facility in honor of Councilmember Ken Dyda
Please follow directives stated in Council Policy number 37.
Thank you,
Patricia Parker
28018 Santana Dr.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
1 \\).
Enyssa Momoli
To: Nathan Zweizig
Subject: RE: Proposed name change from PVIC to KDIC
-----Original Message-----
From: Crystal Chen <crystalreulchen@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 2:02 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Proposed name change from PVIC to KDIC
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Good afternoon, RPV council members,
I heard the proposal to rename PVIC after Councilmember Dyda at the last meeting, and would like to humbly request
that you reconsider renaming the park. While I understand your desire to honor a founding member of RPV and a loyal
servant over the decades, I do not think renaming RPV's flagship park after Councilmember Dyda is appropriate. Point
Vicente Interpretive Center has a long history in the community, is iconic, and known worldwide under its' current
name. Those of us who have donated to it throughout the years fondly refer to it as PVIC. (I personally have donated five
times -for a whale honoring the passing of two family members that lived up by Ryan Park, three bricks, two of which
were for my family members that were married at PVIC, one honoring my son's birth, and most recently a plaque
honoring my mother who loved Palos Verdes during her time raising me there where my first job was working for the
original Discovery Room at Ladera Linda, and again when I lived there as an adult raising my own family who attended
Portuguese Bend Nursery School and Lunada Bay Elementary School.).
For the simple reason that KDIC is not a good acronym and that those of us have donated prodigiously through the years
wish to continue to have fond associations with the name and the park, I ask you to reconsider. There are, in fact, many
lovely alternatives that I believe would be more supported and less laughed at due to the unfortunate acronym, KDIC,
renaming the park would create, including renaming the sunset room at PVIC for Councilmember Dyda or the park near
his home after him. I can only imagine that Councilmember Dyda would not was his park to be laughed at when people
pronounced the acronym for the park, and neither do I want that. No doubt staff could come up with an even more
robust list, if asked.
Thank you for your thoughtful reconsideration of this proposal before the council. I look forward to hearing that the
council will find another wonderful place to honor Councilmember Dyda, as I do appreciate the history and viewpoint he
brings to council meetings.
Sincerely,
Crystal
Crystal Reul-Chen, D. Env.
Former RPV resident, ardent supporter of Ladera Linda and PVIC
1
\v.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Late corr
Teresa Takaoka
Thursday, May 27, 2021 10:59 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Ken Dyda Recognition
From: jeanlongacre@aol.com <jeanlongacre@aol.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 202110:58 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Ken Dyda Recognition
Dear City Council,
I fully support recognizing the exceptional contributions of Ken Dyda. As for the location, it should be extra special and
something that would warm his heart.
If Point Vicente is selected, then perhaps we could combine the history of the location which was named by Captain
Vancouver when he mapped the West Coast and the modern facility that exists today. For example, the Ken Dyda Park
and Museum at Point Vicente. (To me, Interpretive Center is generic and museum would be new and broader in scope.)
As far as the whale watching maps are concerned, the historic identification could stay and add to the importance of the
park. Los Serenos could keep their name. We could honor one great explorer and one great modern day leader at the
same time. It would be like Terranea is at Long Point. Just a thought.
I am sure City Council will go over all the options and make a decision worthy of the man they wish to honor.
Sincerely,
Jean Longacre
6 Martingale Drive
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
310-544-01 05
cc:Ara
1
\D.
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Karina Banales
Friday, May 28, 2021 10:28 AM
Matt Waters
Daniel Trautner; Cory Linder; CityClerk
FW: Honoring Ken Dyda
From: johann corbett <johannacorbett@verizon.net>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 202110:23 AM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Honoring Ken Dyda
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
TO THE RPV CITY COUNCIL.
I understand that several venues are being considered to honor Mr. Ken Dyda for the contributions he has made to the
city over the years.
I have been a docent at Pt. Vicente since 1984 and was the first president of Los Serenos de Pt. Vicente. Throughout this
time the Center has been close to my heart. Since the opening it has been named Point Vicente Interpretive Center,
which has both a sense of place and purpose. This name is used in all the guide books and tourist information and feel it
would be inappropriate to change that.
Your reference documents state that there should be a well-defined connection between the contributions of the
individual or community organization and the city facility, and that is not the case here. Mr. Dyda has been associated
with the Historical Society but not with the Interpretive Center.
I do hope you will find a more appropriate method to honor Mr. Dyda.
Yours sincerely,
Johanna Corbett
Sent from my iPad
1
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Karina Bafia/es
Deputy City Manager
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
30940 Hawthorne Blvd.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
(310) 544-5203
kbanales@rpvca.gov
Karina Banales
Saturday, May 29, 2021 7:46 PM
Matt Waters
Daniel Trautner; Cory Linder; CityClerk
Fwd: Agenda Item No. 10
DYDA.docx
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
To limit public contact and help prevent the spread of COVID-19, City Hall is temporarily closed to the public, but services
are available by telephone, email, online and limited curbside service. Some employees are working on rotation and may
be working remotely. Please note that our response to your inquiry could be delayed. For a list of department phone
numbers, visit the Staff Directory on the City website.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Diane Robinson <ido.stunts@yahoo.com>
Date: May 29, 2021 at 5:10:33 PM PDT
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Agenda Item No. 10
Reply-To: Diane Robinson <ido.stunts@yahoo.com>
Please refer to attached document re: response to Agenda Item No.
10 on the upcoming June 1st City Council meeting which pertains to
naming a City facility after Ken Dyda.
1
SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 10 on the upcoming June 1st City Council meeting which pertains
to naming a City facility after Ken Dyda.
Mayor-Pro-Tern-David-Bradley and City Council,
I do not believe nor do I support re-naming the Point Vicente Interpretive Center in honor of
Councilman Dyda. In all due respect to his civic accomplishments and contributions he does not
meet any of the conditions listed in Agenda Item No. 10 (as you had mentioned), nor is there any
well-defined connection to the Point Vicente Interpretive Center, including the Sunset Room or
a Wall of Honor. Yes, he has been involved in many city activities, contributions and
organizations, such as the RPV Historical Society, but NOT PVIC.
With all the listed options mentioned it is more appropriate to consider the following
recommendations regarding a tribute to Councilmember Dyda's contributions ..
1. City Hall and/or Upper Point Vicente/Civic Center. It would behoove to include this
tribute and respect within the City's Civic Center Master Plan where the City would be
able to locate a site on this 1 7-acre property that offers spectacular ocean views from
multiple locations and includes the current City Hall complex. I believe and feel such
recommendation would be "particularly appropriate given his contribution to the founding
of Rancho Palos Verdes and his decades-long involvement in Citv Government, " as well
as informative to the public especially on a ceremonial opening day.
2. Grandview Park: This 18-acre, open space park offers beautiful views and informal
walking trails. It is located near Councilmember Dyda's long-time home.
In summary, please consider these thoughts and the contributions of any nominee to a particular
facility when the city wants to rename it in honor of that person. Please also consider to include
this when implementing a formal policy or guidelines ..
"The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City Council and to
guide staff in the naming of City facilities, including parks and open space areas, buildings, streets
and other public amenities. In addition, there have been no formal policies or guidelines for
honoring City leaders, nor for memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a
remembrance in the form of a bench or tree. "
Respectfully Submitted,
Vu;wie,'R~
Rancho Palos Verdes
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Larry <larry@maizlish.com>
Sunday, May 30, 2021 9:59 AM
CC; CityClerk
CC Meeting 6/1/21 -Item 10
Hi Council and Staff. Please see comments below regarding Agenda Item 10.
Naming a City facility after a person who is still living is prohibited as per our City policy. I'm not a fan of making
exceptions to policies of this type as it might set a precedent for the future and who knows what would happen 10 -20
years from now. A future City Council could say "well we've done that in the recent past, so lets make another exception
to the policy.' That being said, if there was ever a worthwhile opportunity for us to make an exception to this naming
policy, this would be it.
Ken Dyda has been actively shaping and supporting the community and our city since I was a little kid here. Not meaning
to date Councilman Dyda, I recall my family meeting with him when I was in my early schooling here in PV and the idea of
city incorporation was being discussed. Ever since that time, he has been a very active person in developing, supporting,
and maintaining the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
In this particular case, I would support making an exception to our remaining policy guidelines and naming a facility after
Mr. Dyda. Out of the possible choices listed in the Staff report, I would support naming the PVIC after him. Instead of an
individual room there, I would support the naming of the whole facility after him.
No one in our current generation here in the City is more deserving of this than him. Let's move ahead on this, take
advantage of this opportunity, and honor his decades of contributions to our city.
Thank you,
Larry Maizlish
1
Enyssa Momoli
To: Karina Banales
Subject: RE: Considering renaming the Point Vicente Interpretive Center
-----Original Message-----
From: Diana McIntyre <mothermac@me.com>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 3:37 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Considering renaming the Point Vicente Interpretive Center
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Dear Council Members
It has been brought to my attention that you are considering renaming the Point Vicente Interpretive Center. I think that
this is a big mistake.
When we received money to build the building, it was stated that the name must include "Interpretive Center", which
the City agreed to.
The name gives the location fo the Center.
A persons name and Interpretive Center would be confusing as we are not interpreting them.
You are running out of locations to name after outstanding community members.
A while back, there was a suggestion to building a wall or series of pillars at the Center to be used to salute these
outstanding community members. It was suggested that it be put across the parking lot from the entrance. It is a good
idea, why not do that. You could honor many more people that way, now and into the future.
It is a very special place and popular with the public. It took awhile for people to understand what we were, but now it is
clear.
I was the first Docent Coordinator and Curator at the Center and worked there for 32 years. I was hired in1983 by the
City, a year before the Center opened. I retired in 2015.
Please consider the above and leave the name alone.
Sincerely,
Diana Ryan McIntyre
732 Cloyden Rd.
Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274
mothermac@mac.com
1 \\J .
Enyssa Momoli
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Teresa Takaoka
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 10:13 AM
Enyssa Momoli
FW: Renaming PVIC
From: Willis Binnard <willis@binnard.com>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 7:32 PM
To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov>
Subject: Renaming PVIC
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
I think honoring Ken Dyda is a nice idea. However, I don't think PVIC is the correct facility.
1