CC SR 20200616 M - Border Issues Report
RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 06/16/2020
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar
AGENDA TITLE:
Consideration and possible action to review the current status of Border Issues.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Receive and file the first biannual report on the status of Border Issues for 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Amount Budgeted: N/A
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): N/A
ORIGINATED BY: Megan Barnes, Senior Administrative Analyst
REVIEWED BY: Karina Bañales, Deputy City Manager
APPROVED BY: Ara Mihranian, AICP, City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
A. May 2020 Defense Fuel Support Point San Pedro Request for
Qualifications (page A-1)
B. March 2020 Ponte Vista Specific Plan Interpretation Determination Letter
(page B-1)
C. Ponte Vista Subarea Plot Plan (page C-1)
D. The Estates at Ponte Vista Presentation (page D-1)
E. Ponte Vista Entry Gates and Monument Signs Presentation (page E-1)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This biannual report includes:
An update on the Cal Water pipeline project in Rolling Hills Estates, the
unincorporated Westfield community and Rancho Palos Verdes
An update on the proposed 248-unit Butcher Solana apartment project at
Hawthorne Boulevard and Via Valmonte in Torrance
An update on the proposed leasing of the Defense Fuel Support Point San Pedro
for commercial fueling operations
1
An update on the Ponte Vista development on a former Navy housing site on
Western Avenue in San Pedro
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
This is the first biannual report to the City Council on various “Border Issues” potentially
affecting residents of Rancho Palos Verdes for 2020. The full current status report and
archived reports are available on the City’s website at:
http://www.rpvca.gov/781/Border-Issues-Status-Report
Please note that, with the approval of changes to City Council Policy No. 34, the next
Border Issues Status Report is expected to appear on a City Council agenda in
December 2020.
Current Border Issues
Palos Verdes Peninsula Water Reliability Project, Rolling Hills Estates/Los Angeles
County/Rancho Palos Verdes
In mid-January 2020, Cal Water crews transitioned to the second phase of 24/7 traffic
control on Crenshaw Boulevard from Silver Spur Road to south of Chadwick Lane for
the Palos Verdes Peninsula Water Reliability Project. Construction delineators and dual
yellow striping were moved from the northbound lanes of Crenshaw Boulevard to the
southbound lanes, with one lane open in each direction at all times. Night work restarted
on Crenshaw Boulevard, beginning at the Rolling Hills United Methodist Church and
continuing down to south of Chadwick Lane, including the intersection of Crenshaw
Boulevard and Palos Verdes Drive North.
In late January, crews repaved the southbound lane of Crenshaw Boulevard from Crest
Road to Indian Peak Road and performed striping in early February. Crews then began
construction at the intersection of Crenshaw Boulevard and Silver Spur Road, with
downhill traffic diverted to the southbound lane of Crenshaw Boulevard . Flashing red
signals and traffic control officers were in place to facilitate traffic flow. Work in the
intersection was completed by March 9.
A milestone was reached in mid-April, when Cal Water announced that all seven new
miles of pipeline was installed, 24/7 traffic control was removed on Crenshaw Boulevard
and all lanes were reopened. Crews began conducting finishing work, including welding
and grouting, to prepare for the new pipeline to be tied into the existing drinking water
system, with smaller, periodic daytime closures along Crenshaw Boulevard.
At the end of April, another milestone was reached when night work was completed on
Crenshaw Boulevard from the Rolling Hills United Methodist Church to Chadwick Lane,
including the intersection of Palos Verdes Drive North and Crenshaw Boulevard.
2
As of the writing of this report, tie-in work connecting the new pipeline to the existing
water system was scheduled for June 10, which may cause a temporary drop in water
pressure for residents and businesses on the Peninsula for approximately 24 hours.
Residents were asked to be mindful of water usage and to conserve where possible to
prevent further lowering of water pressure or any potential interruptions in water service .
There will continue to be smaller, periodic closures along Crenshaw Boulevard,
between Crest Road and the Rolling Hills United Methodist Church, as crews continue
finishing work for the new drinking water pipeline.
Once final tie-ins are complete in the next few weeks, residents will see a decrease in
heavy construction and traffic control measures as crews transition to completing the
remaining, minor finishing work along the water pipeline route.
The new pump station on Crenshaw Boulevard, just north of Silver Spur Road, remains
under construction, with work taking place from Monday to Friday, between 7 a.m. and
5 p.m., with some intermittent Saturday work.
In July, Cal Water expects to begin a 30-day acceptance period during which the new
water pipeline and pump station will be fully operational.
Cal Water currently anticipates that all activities for the new water pipeline and pump
station will be complete by the end of the summer. As a reminder, these currently
represent Cal Water’s best estimates. Construction timing may change based on
several factors, including unforeseeable field circumstances.
Staff will remove this item from future Border Issues Status Reports. For additional
information about the Palos Verdes Peninsula Water Reliability Project, visit
http://www.pvpwaterproject.com or call 310-257-1400 (mention the PVP Water
Reliability Project).
Butcher Solana Residential Development Project (Torrance)
There has been no change in the status of the proposed Butcher Solana apartment
project at the southwest corner of Hawthorne Boulevard and Via Valmonte, which would
consist of 248 one- and two-bedroom apartments in three five-story buildings with 484
parking spaces in a six-story structure.
According to the City of Torrance, in mid-September 2019, the project developer notified
planning staff it was putting the project on hold while it reviewed more than 690
comment letters on the project’s Draft Environmental Impact Report, which was
released in June 2019.
City of Torrance planning staff has indicated the project remains on hold as of June
2020.
3
Staff will continue to monitor this issue in future Border Issues Status Reports.
Additional information about the project is available on the City of Torrance’s website at
https://www.torranceca.gov/our-city/community-development/planning/butcher-solana.
Current Border Issues
Defense Fuel Support Point San Pedro (Los Angeles (San Pedro))
On November 4, 2019, the U.S. Navy released a request for proposals (RFP) for a
proposed outlease of Defense Fuel Support Point San Pedro (DFSP), the sprawling,
inactive Navy fuel tank farm on North Gaffey Street (which borders the City on a stretch
of Western Avenue), and an 8-acre marine terminal about five miles southeast in the
Port of Long Beach.
The proposed outlease with a commercial operator would enable the Navy to use the
site for fueling operations for its growing Pacific Fleet without having to cover the costs
of rehabilitation and maintenance. A draft environmental assessment (EA) was released
in April 2019, and the City submitted comments raising serious concerns with the
proposal, including the unknowns of potential commercial uses and the construction of
new facilities at the San Pedro site, public safety hazards, increased traffic, and
biological and visual impacts.
The solicitation period for the RFP closed on February 14, 2020, with no proposals
received. However, the Navy still has a requirement for contingency ship fueling that
must be provided in a safe, secure and cost-effective manner. After receiving feedback
from the industry, it was determined that there was commercial interest in the release of
a modified solicitation offering more flexible alternatives (including the ability to take only
portions of the DFSP property rather than the entire property) and more information to
proposers. The Navy released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) on May 1, 2020, with
a re-structured RFP scheduled to be available in July 2020. The RFQ was updated to
extend the deadline for Statements of Qualification to June 11, 2020.
A copy of the RFQ is attached to this report (Attachment A) and can be viewed online at
https://beta.sam.gov/opp/e70b882837da49ea9a67ce7403c2738f/view?keywords=defen
se%20fuel%20support%20point&sort=-relevance&index=opp&is_active=true&page=1
It is Staff’s understanding that the final EA will not be released until after proposals
come in so the assessment can fully analyze the most likely scenarios for future use of
the site.
Staff will continue to monitor this issue in future Border Issues Status Reports.
Ponte Vista (formerly Highpark) Project (Los Angeles (San Pedro))
There have been significant developments in the progress of the 676-unit Ponte Vista
residential development in San Pedro (please note that the project name has changed
4
back from Highpark to Ponte Vista). The project site is located on 61.4 acres of former
Navy housing at 26900 South Western Avenue, across from and just south of Green
Hills Memorial Park.
In November 2019, the project’s new owner and master developer, Harridge
Development Group, applied to the City of Los Angeles for an interpretation of the
Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific Plan to make minor adjustments to internal
boundaries between subareas within the development. The interpretation was approved
in March 2020 (Attachment B). A plot plan showing the seven subareas of the project is
included in this report (Attachment C).
In mid-January 2020, the City began receiving complaints about traffic congestion from
residents off Western Avenue in and around the Rolling Hills Rivera Homeowners
Association (generally the streets around Avenida Aprenda). The traffic was the result of
roadwork being performed by Caltrans as part of the improvements associated with the
Ponte Vista project. The work included:
the installation of upgraded traffic signals at Avenida Aprenda, Pacific Coast
Highway, Palos Verdes Drive North and Capital Drive
a widening of Western Avenue to create a dedicated right turn-out lane taking
motorists into the Ponte Vista property
the installation of a new signal at Peninsula Verde Drive, just north of Avenida
Aprenda, on Western Avenue
the installation of a left-turn signal for entrance into Mary Star of the Sea High
School from Western Avenue
new medians, landscaping and bus turnout lanes
Staff coordinated with Caltrans and Harridge Development Group to improve public
communication about the construction-related delays. The portion of the roadwork that
caused the most significant backup was completed in early February, and striping was
performed soon after. According to Harridge Development Group, this concluded work
in the roadway.
On June 3, Staff attended a virtual meeting of the Northwest San Pedro Neighborhood
Council (NWSPNC) Planning and Land Use Committee, which included a presentation
on the status of the Ponte Vista project.
It is Staff’s understanding that Harridge Development Group will build the recreation,
landscaping and common areas of the project, while the residential subareas will be
sold to home builders. D.R. Horton will build 66 homes in Subarea 1 on the northwest
corner of the project site across from the entrance to Green Hills Memorial Park. These
detached single-family homes will be called The Estates at Ponte Vista. D.R. Horton
plans to apply for building permits in July 2020 to construct the first model homes, which
would be ready to show in October. Designs and elevations of homes in Subarea 1 are
included in this report as Attachment D. According to Harridge Development Group, the
next homes would be built in Subarea 3 by Kaufman & Broad.
5
Renderings of entry gates and monument signs along Western Avenue (Attachment E)
were also presented to the NWSPNC Planning and Land Use Committee. The most
publicly visible entrance will be the northern entry gate on Western Avenue, which will
include palm trees, steel access gates, stone entry walls and a metal, backlit cutout
Ponte Vista community sign. Harridge Development Group is currently seeking approval
for these entry gates and monument signs from the City of Los Angeles.
Staff will continue to monitor this issue in future Border Issues Status Reports.
New Border Issues
There are no new Border Issues on which to report at this time.
6
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
DEFENSE FUEL SUPPORT POINT (DFSP) SAN PEDRO
LEASE AND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY,
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA
1 May 2020
Digitally signed by
BIXLER.DAVID. BIXLER.DAVID.B.1046499
421
B.l 046499421 Date: 2020.04.30 17:53:28
-07'00'
D . B. BIXLER
Real Estate Contracting Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Southwest Division
San Diego, CA
When referring to this Solicitation, please note that it is Solicitation No. N6247321RP006
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 A-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION
1. Enabling Authority
2. Acquisition Process
B. BACKGROUND
C. PROJECT OVERVIEW
D. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (STEP 1 RFQ)
1. Submission Requirements
2. Evaluation Factors
3. Instructions and Additional Information
E. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (STEP 2 RFP)
1. Introduction
2. Project Information
3. Proposal Submission Content and Evaluation Factors
4. Proposal Submission Instructions and Additional Information
5. Evaluation of Proposals
F. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
G. POINTS OF CONTACT FOR INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATIONS
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 A-2
APPENDICES
A. Map of DFSP San Pedro Property Available for Lease and Assignment
B. DFSP San Pedro Property and Improvements Available for Lease and Assignment
C. Facility Condition Assessment for Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, DFSP San Pedro, Oct
2019
D. Offeror's Cover Page
E . Data Pack (to be provided at Step 2 RFP)
-Sample Lease
-Historical and Projected Cost Information
-Draft Environmental Condition of Property Report
-Draft Environmental Assessment
SOLICITATION NO. N6247321RP006 A-3
A. INTRODUCTION
1. ENABLING AUTHORITY
The Department of the Navy ("Navy") proposes to lease non-excess real property
under the authority of Title 10 United States Code (U .S.C .) § 2667 and assign its
rights in offsite real property related to Navy-owned fuel pipelines, for commercial
and military fueling operations purposes at Defense Fuel Support Point ("DFSP")
San Pedro, California.
2. ACQUISITION PROCESS
In this solicitation, the Navy has instituted procedures designed to ensure the
selection of a lessee who will provide the best value to the Navy. To meet this
objective while minimizing the amount of resources required to participate in this
solicitation, the Navy will conduct this competitive acquisition in two steps, after
which one offeror will be selected to enter into exclusive negotiations with the
Navy .
Step 1: Request for Qualifications ("RFQ"). Detailed information, including
Submission Requirements and Evaluation Factors, can be found in Section D of
this solicitation. Navy officials will review all "Statements of Qualifications"
("SOQ") received in response to the Step 1 RFQ, may meet with any or all of the
respondents , and may request additional information on particular aspects of the
information submitted. Based on its evaluation of the RFQ submittals, the Navy
will invite not more than four ( 4) offerors, who are determined to be "Best
Qualified," to respond to the Step 2 Request for Proposals. Note: Offerors will be
permitted to submit an offer on one or both of the available parcels (or
portions thereof), and on one or more of the available fuel pipelines (or
portions thereof), in Step 2.
Step 2: Request for Proposals ("RFP"). Detailed information on the Step 2, RFP
Phase, including Submission Content and Evaluation Factors, can be found in
Section E of this solicitation. The Government will only consider proposals from
those offerors who are invited to participate following the RFQ Phase . The
Government will require written technical and financial proposals, potentially
followed by oral presentations as needed. Navy officials will review proposals
submitted in the Step 2, RFP Phase, may meet with any or all offerors, and may
request additional information on particular aspects of the material submitted. The
Navy reserves the right to amend all of, or portions of, the RFP by one or more
formal amendment documents. The Navy may enter into discussions with the
offerors upon completion of the initial RFP evaluation and/or oral presentations.
Upon completion of discussions with offeror( s ), theN avy will select one ( 1) offeror
that, in the Navy's opinion, would provide the best value to the Government and
will designate a period of exclusive negotiations for that offeror.
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 1 A-4
Exclusive Negotiations . During this period of exclusive negotiations, the
selected offeror will : (i) negotiate with the Navy on the lease agreement and
pipeline assignments , if any; (ii) pursue local approval , permitting, and
develop plans, as applicable, and (iii) pursue additional, required project or
environmental documentation , as needed. The result of these exclusive
negotiations will be the long-term lease and assignments (if any), together
with appropriate subordinate documents .
The Navy reserves certain rights in connection with this period of exclusive
negotiations, which are set forth in Section F, Special Conditions and
Limitations.
Offers on Multiple Parcels and Pipelines. In the Step 2, RFP Phase, an
Offeror may propose leasing one or both available parcels (or portions
thereof), and being assigned one or more of the available fuel pipelines
(or portions thereof). The Navy, in its discretion, may reject parcel and
pipeline combination offers proposed by an Offeror(s) and may
counter-propose combinations that are more beneficial to the
Government.
B. BACKGROUND
Operation of the DFSP San Pedro is currently the responsibility of the Defense Logistics
Agency ("DLA"), as DLA has been operating DFSP San Pedro since 1980. In May 2014 ,
DLA placed DFSP San Pedro in a temporary closure status, which placed existing fuel
tanks in a non-active status (as permitted by the Certified Unified Program Agency),
wherein they could be re-opened or permanently closed depending on future mission
requirements.
In February 2016, the Navy moved forward with the partial closure ofDFSP San Pedro,
and DLA began the process of permanently closing all underground storage tanks
("USTs") at the Main Terminal. At the same time, the Navy began the process of planning
for the long-term utilization of the site and is currently pursuing a lease to a non-federal
entity for commercial fueling purposes, while establishing a separate fuel purchase
agreement for the Navy's operational fueling requirements at the site.
DFSP San Pedro is comprised of two Special Areas, the San Pedro Fuel Depot ("Main
Terminal") and Long Beach Fuel Complex, including Pier 12 ("Marine Terminal"), and
onsite and offsite associated pipelines, assigned to Naval Weapons Station ("NWS") Seal
Beach.
C. PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Navy plans to enter into a 25-year lease of its fee-owned real property and assign its
rights of way interests in offsite fuel pipelines, with the corresponding rights to use such
fuel pipelines , at DFSP San Pedro, California, in exchange for which the lessee will provide
"in-kind" consideration ("IKC") to the Navy . This IKC must be valued at not less than the
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 2 A-5
combined fair market value of the leasehold interest and the fair market value of the
interests in the assigned pipeline rights of way, if any.
The Navy's fee-owned property available for lease consists of two parcels, the 311-acre
Main Terminal in San Pedro , California and the 11-acre Main Terminal , including the Pier
12 fuel pier in Long Beach, CA, (collectively the "Leased Premises") both with associated
fueling infrastructure and onsite pipelines.
The rights of way the Navy holds for its approximately 14 miles of three Navy-owned
offsite pipelines (collectively, the "Assigned Premises"), are available for assignment to
the selected offeror. Appendix A, "Map ofDFSP San Pedro Property Available for Lease
and Assignment", shows approximate location and Appendix B, "DFSP San Pedro
Property and Improvements Available for Lease and Assignment ," provides additional
detail on the property and improvements.
In the Step 2, RFP Phase, offerors will be able to propose lease and assignment of all, or
less than all , of the Leased and Assigned Premises available .
A summary of historical facility costs and future cost projection information will be
provided in a "Data Pack," to be provided at the Step 2, RFP Phase.
The vision of this opportunity is the reactivation and sustainment ofNavy facilities to the
maximum extent practicable , with accommodation of the Navy's continuing requirement
at Pier 12 for ongoing fueling ofNavy ships.
The Navy's reservation of space and infrastructure for its fueling requirement, as well as
certain additional objectives and priorities identified for this leasing opportunity, are to be
further addressed by those offerors invited to respond in the Step 2, RFP Phase. Proposed
uses of the property that are determined by the Navy to be to be compatible with the
Navy's ongoing requirement to fuel Navy ships at the fuel pier and pipelines , will be
considered.
DON is completing environmental documentation required under the National
Environmental Policy Act for this Project. A Draft Environmental Assessment ("EA")
and a Draft Environmental Condition of Property Report ("ECP") will be provided with
the Step 2, RFP Phase "Data Pack."
Additional environmental documentation may be required, at the Navy's discretion , for
proposals received outside of the scope of commercial fueling and/or ancillary uses
(parking, warehouse, storage) for the property, or otherwise determined to be outside of
the scope analyzed by the Navy's Draft EA .
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 3 A-6
D. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (STEP 1 RFQ)
1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Interested parties responding to the Step 1 RFQ must provide a "Statement of
Qualifications" ("SOQ") structured in conformance with the outline shown below. The
submission should be concise and only provide relevant material.
A. VISION STATEMENT
Provide a statement articulating the overall concept and approach for development,
operations, and management of the Leased and Assigned Premises , in sufficient
detail to demonstrate the extent, character, and quality of the development
envisioned.
B. ORGANIZATION/TEAM COMPOSITION
Describe participating firms /companies/organizations (including all lenders) in
terms of the roles, responsibilities , and legal relationships of each to the lessee and
to each other. For each such organization, identify the size of the staff and length
of operation as a company, and provide a brief historical profile .
C. DEVELOPMENT, OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE
QUALIFICATIONS, EXPERIENCE, AND PAST PERFORMANCE
Provide a statement describing the company's or team's qualifications and previous
relevant development experience and past performance with projects of a similar
nature, scope and scale. Include development experience and past performance
involving Department of Defense entities, state or local governmental entities, or
federal agencies. Identify appropriate references (names, titles, addresses and
telephone numbers).
Include project descriptions, identifying roles and responsibilities of participants
and current status of projects, including length and type of ownership , occupancy,
asset management responsibilities , and accomplishments. Identify appropriate
references (names , titles, addresses, and telephone numbers).
D. QUALIFICATIONS, EXPERIENCE, AND PAST PERFORMANCE OF
KEY PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Provide a statement identifying the individuals who will play a significant role in
the operations and management of the property, including the individuals
responsible for negotiating and executing the Lease and Assignment agreements
with the Navy . Describe the roles and responsibilities of each. Include key
characteristics of their background, experiences, and past performance that qualify
them to participate in this effort. Identify consultants who will participate .
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 4 A-7
E. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Provide sufficient financial information to establish the net worth and/or liquid
assets available to the company or team for operation and maintenance of the
property. This information shall be in the form of independently certified financial
statements showing assets and liabilities, including contingent liabilities, itemized
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, together with
applicable notes.
Companies or teams must demonstrate sufficient financial strength to enable them
to develop, operate, and maintain the property. Include lender preliminary
commitment letter(s), if applicable.
Financial information must be submitted for the company or team and for any
parent or holding company or any other affiliated entity identified by the company
in response to this solicitation. Identify appropriate financial references (names,
titles, addresses, and telephone numbers).
Please mark financial information "Business Sensitive," as needed.
2. EVALUATION FACTORS
The factors shown below, roughly equal in importance, will be used to evaluate the
SOQs. The SOQs submitted by those judged "Best Qualified" will offer a concept
and approach for development, operation and management of the Leased and
Assigned Premises (if any), that is responsive to the goals set by the Navy; possess
qualifications, experience and past performance which demonstrate many major
strengths, and few major weaknesses and risks; and establish financial capability
and capacity to carry out operations and maintenance of the Leased and Assigned
Premises. In addition, interested parties submitting SOQs judged "Best Qualified"
will have a higher standing relative to other respondents.
A. CONCEPT AND APPROACH
The degree to which the concept and approach to development, operation, and
management of the Leased and Assigned Premises is responsive to the objectives
of the Navy and compatible with protecting and sustaining the asset value of the
Navy property over the proposed lease term of25 years , as well as accommodating
the Navy's reservation of space and infrastructure for continued fueling operations
at the fuel pier.
B. DEVELOPMENT, OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE
QUALIFICATIONS
The nature and extent of the qualifications, experience , and past performance of the
company or team with respect to development , ongoing management (including
asset management) and operation of projects and properties of a similar nature,
scope, and scale. Of particular importance will be development experience and past
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 5 A-8
performance with projects involving State or local governmental agencies, DOD,
the Navy, or other federal agencies. Also of particular importance will be the
financial strength, leasing/operating/management/asset management experience,
and any past performance with projects involving fueling infrastructure
management (operations and sustainment).
C. QUALIFICATIONS OF KEY PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
The nature and extent of the qualifications, experience, and past performance of the
individual key participants and specific personnel proposed for major involvement
in development, operations, and maintenance of the Leased and Assigned Premises.
D. FINANCIAL CAPABILITY/CAPACITY
The degree of financial strength and evidence that the company or team possesses
the financial capability and capacity to carry out operations and maintenance of the
Leased and Assigned Premises.
3. INSTRUCTIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. One signed (1) original, six (6) copies, and one (1) compact disc (CD) copy of
the SOQ prepared in response to this RFQ must be received at the following address
no later than:
Time: 1 :00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time
Date: Monday, June 1, 2020
If submitted via U.S. Mail:
Department of the Navy
Attn: Kimberly Spencer, Real Estate B127
1220 Pacific Highway
San Diego , CA 92132-6186
If submitted via a Parcel Delivery Service:
Attn: Kimberly Spencer, Real Estate B127
Department of the Navy
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest
1220 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 92132-6186
Email delivery confirmation to Kimberly Spencer at
Kimberly.spencer@navy.mil, and include a soft copy of the SOQ in the
email.
Electronic or facsimile offers or modifications will not be considered.
Any submission received after the time and date specified above will be
rejected.
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 6 A-9
B . Submissions should be sent in an envelope clearly marked "STATEMENT OF
QUALIFICATIONS -DFSP SAN PEDRO LEASE AND DEVELOPMENT
OPPORTUNITY, NWS SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA (SOLICITATION
N6247321RP006)."
C . Written comments and questions regarding the Step 1 RFQ shall be made to
Kimberly Spencer at kimberly.spencer@nayy.mil. Inquiries and requests for
information shall be submitted in writing no later than fourteen (14) business days
prior to the SOQ due date. All comments and questions will be reviewed for
appropriate action. Individual responses may not be provided .
E. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (STEP 2 RFP)
1. INTRODUCTION
Offerors determined to be "Best Qualified" in the Step 1, RFQ Phase , will be
invited to participate in the Step 2, RFP Phase, and may submit a proposal in the
form of technical and financial proposals which reflect the availability and amount
of funding and the manner in which Navy requirements , objectives , and priorities
will be met.
Appendices A - D are provided to assist offerors in preparing responses to this
solicitation. Appendix E, "Data Pack" (issued at the Step 2, RFP Phase, only),
contains details relating to the DFSP San Pedro complex, and will be provided to
those offerors determined to be "Best Qualified" who are invited to participate in
the Step 2, RFP Phase , and sign a non-disclosure agreement. The Data Pack may
include, but not necessarily be limited to, items such as Navy fueling reservation
information, a sample Navy lease , a Draft Environmental Condition of Property
Report, and a Draft Environmental Assessment.
A. VISION
The vision of this opportunity is the development, operation, and maintenance of
DFSP San Pedro, in support of the reactivation and sustainment ofNavy facilities
to the maximum extent practicable, and accommodation of the Navy's continuing
requirement at Pier 12 for ongoing fueling ofNavy ships.
B. OBJECTIVES
• Entering into a long-term lease and pipeline assignment agreements, as
applicable, with a responsible party;
• Property use may involve fueling operations for commercial purposes, or other
use compatible with the Navy's ongoing fueling requirements, at the Navy's
discretion;
• Disturbing only those areas historically used for operations and avoiding known
natural resources;
• Allowing for the enhancement of on-site habitat by the Navy;
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 7 A-10
• Accommodating the ongoing site cleanup pursuant to both the Comprehensive
Environmental Response , Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA") and
Clean Water Act ("CWA");
• Complying with all National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") and ECP
Report requirements ;
• Maintaining the safety and security of the Leased and Assigned Premises ;
• Maintaining positive relations with the communities surrounding the property;
and
• Employing best commercial practices to the benefit of both the Navy and the
selected offeror.
C. NAVY FUELING REQUIREMENT
The Navy retains the ability to fuel military ships at the fuel pier (Pier 12) on the
Marine Terminal. In its plans for the parcels and pipelines selected, the selected
offeror must ensure the appropriate infrastructure to enable the fueling of Navy
ships at the fuel pier. Further information on the Navy 's fueling requirement is
captured in Appendix E, the "Data Pack" (to be issued at the Step 2, RFP Phase
only).
2. PROJECT INFORMATION
A. EXISTING FACILITIES AND LAND
The existing facilities and associated infrastructure will be leased to the lessee
together with the leasing of the land within the Leased Premises. Rights of way for
the off-site fuel pipelines will be assigned to the lessee, as needed and negotiated.
Upon expiration of the term of the lease , the lessee will transfer all infrastructure
and improvements then existing , that were constructed, renovated , repaired, or
maintained during the lease term, back to the Navy. The off-site fuel pipelines,
improved during the term of the lease and assignments or not, remain the property
of the Government upon expiration of the lease and assignments .
Appendix B contains the improvements and more detailed information on each
parcel of the Leased and Assigned Premises available , and Appendix C contains
aerials, photos, and condition information . Additional pipeline condition
information will be provided in Appendix E, "Data Pack" (to be issued at the Step
2, RFP Phase), as needed.
Lessee shall protect the Navy's land and existing facilities. A sample Navy Lease
that addresses the Government's interest in its land and associated infrastructure
will be provided in Appendix E , "Data Pack" (to be issued at the Step 2, RFP
Phase).
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 8 A-11
B. OFFERS ON MULTIPLE PARCELS AND PIPELINES
An Offeror may make offers on one or both of the available parcels (or portion
thereof), and on one or more of the available fuel pipelines (or portions
thereof), in the Leased and Assigned Premises available. The Navy, in its
discretion, may reject a combination proposed by an offeror(s) and may
counter-propose combinations that are more beneficial to the Government.
Based on proposals received, the Navy will determine if parcels or pipelines
will be retained by the Navy or leased during exclusive negotiations:
PARCEL/PIPELINE SIZE
Marine Terminal Parcel 11 acres
(includes fuel pier)
Main Terminal 311 acres*
Parcel
*See Section E below
"G" Pipeline -.67 miles
"R" Pipeline -2.49 miles
"Long Beach" Pipelines (2) -11 miles combined
c:J Installation -Long B~ach Pipe lines [JP ~S, JP ~8)
Uc:~ns.t!!d Areas. (Not Part of tht!! Project A~i:!!a) R-LiM
.::::::;:. Hi ghway -G-Lint!!
'-_ ~ ~ City eoundar'y
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 9 A-12
C. TERM
The term of the lease shall be up to 25 years. In order to enter into leases over 5
years' duration, the Secretary of the Navy must determine that a lease for a longer
period will promote the national defense or be in the public interest. Thus , a lease
with a term of more than 5 years is subject to the approval of the Secretary of the
Navy. However, the Navy anticipates issuing a lease (and associated assignments
of rights of way for the fuel pipelines) for a term of 25 years.
D. CONSIDERATION
A specific price/consideration proposal shall be submitted. Consideration
proposed to the Navy will be evaluated against the Fair Market Value rental range
determined by an Appraisal completed in 2019 for the sole use of the Navy, not
available to offerors, that includes a) a leasehold interest in one or both parcels in
the Leased Premises (or portions thereof) b) easement, permit, and right of way
interests of one or more of the fuel pipelines in the Assigned Premises (or portions
thereof), and c) use of the Navy-owned pipelines, facilities , and appurtenances on
the Leased and Assigned Premises . The Navy requires In Kind Consideration in
the form of Long-Term Maintenance projects at Navy installations that may
include, but are not limited to, NWS Seal Beach, pursuant to those allowed for the
Navy to accept per 10 U.S.C § 2667 , and will determine the specific long term
maintenance projects to be delivered . However, at the discretion of the Navy, the
selected offeror may be required to pay rent in cash on a quarterly basis in
advance , in lieu of conducting long term maintenance projects.
Consideration for the fuel pipeline rights of way assigned to the selected offeror,
if any, as well as use of the Navy-owned fuel pipelines and appurtenances located
within such rights of way, is to be included in the total consideration owed the
Navy under the lease.
E. MAIN TERMINAL PHASING OF ACREAGE AVAILABLE FOR USE
The Navy and DLA are conducting environmental remediation efforts on multiple
sites on the Main Terminal parcel that are expected to extend beyond the lease
execution date. Approximately 43 acres of the 311 acres of the Main Terminal are
immediately available for use by the selected offeror, with a total of 164 additional
acres becoming available (subject to current and future land use controls) as
remediation on the property is completed . Refer to Appendix A , Page 2 of2, "Map
of Property Available for Lease and Assignment" for the phasing of the property.
104 acres will remain permanently unavailable for disturbance or use throughout
the term of the lease due to the presence of the federally-endangered Palos Verdes
blue butterfly, and the federally-threatened Coastal California Gnatcatcher.
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 10 A-13
F. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND OPERATIONAL
LIMITS
An ECP Report and EA are underway and will be completed by the Navy prior to
lease execution. The Draft ECP and Draft EA will be provided with Appendix E ,
"Data Pack" (to be issued at the Step 2, RFP Phase , only).
The selected offeror will be responsible for compliance with applicable
environmental mitigation measures and Land Use Controls ("LUCs") after lease
execution. The environmental mitigation measures and LUCs are scheduled to be
finalized prior to lease execution, upon completion of the Draft ECP Report and
Draft EA.
Additionally, maximum allowable operational limits for the purpose of the
environmental analysis have been established. The Navy will evaluate operations
proposed to determine whether the environmental impacts are fully encompassed
by the Draft EA's analysis. If operations are proposed that would involve
anticipated environmental impacts beyond those analyzed by the EA, and if the
Navy wishes to consider allowing any such activity or use beyond what has been
analyzed by the EA, additional environmental analysis would be required before
any decision could be made to award a lease that would allow the operations
proposed. The maximum operations environmentally studied are captured in the
Draft EA, to be provided in Appendix E, "Data Pack" (to be issued at the Step 2,
RFP Phase).
G. ONGOING GOVERNMENT REPAIR AND REMEDIATION
Beyond the environmental remediation efforts, the Navy and DLA are also
conducting facility repair and demolition efforts on the Leased Premises that are
anticipated to extend beyond lease execution. The Navy, DLA , and their respective
contractors, subcontractors , agents , and officers will require access to the Leased
and Assigned Premises during and after lease award for completion of these
projects.
H. PROHIBITED USES
The following uses and activities are prohibited on the Leased and Assigned
Premises :
• Any use or activity that adversely affects the health, safety, welfare,
morale, security, or discipline of the Armed Forces (Air Force, Army,
Coast Guard , Marine Corps , and Navy).
• Any use or activity that adversely affects the health, safety , welfare,
morale or security of residents and businesses adjacent to the Leased and
Assigned Premises .
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 11 A-14
• Structures, activities, and operations that adversely affect installation
security and/or force protection.
• Any uses or activities involving the storage, treatment, or disposal of
toxic or hazardous materials, except as specifically authorized and
approved by the Navy .
• Residential uses.
• Illegal Activities.
• Any use or activity that is incompatible with environmental, operational
or land use constraints.
I. UTILITIES
The Leased Premises are served by local utility service providers, not the Navy.
The selected offeror will be responsible for coordination and funding of all utilities
and support services needed for the operation and management of the Leased and
Assigned Premises.
J. LAW ENFORCEMENT AND FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES
The selected offeror will be responsible for procuring first responder (police, fire
protection) services to the Leased and Assigned Premises from the appropriate local
providers.
K. INSURANCE
The selected offeror shall ensure appropriate insurance will be in place for the term
of the lease and assignments. The Navy shall be named as additional insured, and
property insurance coverage against loss or damage shall be in an amount not less
than One Hundred Percent (100%) of the full replacement cost of the buildings,
building improvements, improvements to the land, fixtures, and personal property
on the proposed Leased Premises. The cost of such coverage will be included in the
financial plan and pro forma section of the offeror's proposal.
L. LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION AND REGULATORY AGENCIES
The current legislative jurisdiction of the Main Terminal of the Leased Premises is
partial and proprietary. The Main Terminal is located within the city limits of Los
Angeles and Lomita. The current legislative jurisdiction of the Marine Terminal is
concurrent. It is located within the city limits of Long Beach. Construction permits
will be issued/controlled by the local regulatory agencies having jurisdiction.
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 12 A-15
M. PROPERTY MAINTENANCE & MANAGEMENT
The selected offeror will have responsibility for all property maintenance and
management of items on the Leased and Assigned Premises for the term of the
lease, and for compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, codes, standards,
and criteria.
N. TAXES
The selected offeror shall be independently responsible for any and all taxes,
assessments, or payments in lieu of taxes that may be levied against its interests,
activities, and operations on the Leased and Assigned Premises.
0. FINANCIAL PROVISIONS
The Navy will require that all financing be in place on or before the date of lease
and assignment execution. The selected offeror shall not cross collateralize and/or
cross default the lease, or the assets or revenues from any improvements. Moreover,
the selected offeror will be prohibited from assigning, pledging, hypothecating or
otherwise transferring its interest in the net cash flows or ownership of any
improvements, in part, or in entirety, without prior written approval of the Navy.
Prior to the commencement of any phase of construction, the selected offeror shall
deliver to the Navy performance bonds in an amount, and subject to, conditions
deemed acceptable to the Navy.
P. RESTORATION REQUIREMENT
Except as otherwise stated, upon expiration or earlier termination of the lease and
assignments, the Navy has the option to cause title to all improvements to be vested
in the United States, or to require the selected offeror to remove the improvements
and restore the Leased and Assigned Premises to the condition that existed at the
commencement of the lease term, or to a condition that is acceptable to the Navy.
Q. BUILDING CODES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Construction on the Leased and Assigned Premises shall comply with all local, city
and county building codes and all applicable governmental laws, codes, rules and
regulations. Construction on the Leased and Assigned Premises shall also comply
with the appropriate National Fire Protection Association ("NFPA") Standards,
National Electrical Code ("NEC"), and National Electric Safety Code ("NESC"),
then in effect for the type(s) of occupancy proposed, or such other more stringent
fire protection, electrical and other life safety codes, if any, then in effect and
adopted by the city and county. All uses and development shall be in accordance
with applicable federal, state, and local laws rules, regulations, and ordinances,
including building codes, as they may be amended from time to time.
Development and construction may be subject to Department of Defense and/or
Navy Anti-Terrorism and Force Protection requirements, including but not limited
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 13 A-16
to the following: Unified Facilities Criteria ("UFC") 4-010-01 "DoD Minimum
Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings;" UFC 4-020-01 "Security Engineering
Facilities Planning Manual;" UFC 4-021-02 "Electronic Security Systems;" and UFC
4-025-01 "Security Engineering ."
At the Navy's discretion, construction and/or improvements to the Leased and
Assigned Premises may be required to adhere to NWS Seal Beach construction
requirements as well as the UFC, particularly for facilities having the potential to
handle military fuel. In addition, improvements are prohibited in habitat areas,
remediation sites, atop monitoring wells , and across the surface of active faults.
Selected offeror's plans for improvements to the property must be submitted to the
Navy for review and consent, must include certification of compliance with federal,
state , and local laws, regulations, and building codes associated with construction
near fault lines , and must include comprehensive engineering studies identifying
the location and characteristics of active faults and liquefaction zones.
R. EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES
Known third-party current and future real estate encumbrances or constraints
existing at the Leased Premises will be provided in Appendix E , "Data Pack," as
needed. The selected offeror will be responsible for determining and coordinating
use of the selected Leased and Assigned Premises, with all third party holders of
easements and encumbrances encumbering them.
If improvements to the property are proposed by the selected offeror, the Navy may
require the selected offeror to provide a Title Report or conduct review of the
Navy's encumbrance records, at the Navy's discretion and at the selected offeror's
sole cost and expense . The selected offeror will be prohibited from planning and
constructing improvements that will disturb any third-party reasonable rights of use
of or access .
S. HISTORICAL, CULTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL
Based on the results of studies conducted at DFSP San Pedro as part of the 2016
partial closure action , the Navy found that there were no archaeological sites at
DFSP San Pedro eligible for the National Register of Historic Places ("NRHP").
The Navy also initiated Section 106 consultation for the partial closure with the
California State Historic Preservation Officer ("SHPO") who concurred that the
65 buildings and structures comprising DFSP San Pedro (Main Terminal and
Marine Terminal parcels) are ineligible for listing on the NRHP. Thus, no further
action is required under the National Historic Preservation Act.
T. MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS ASSISTANCE ACT
In accordance with Title V of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, a
Federal Register screening notice regarding the Leased Premises has been
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 14 A-17
3.
completed by the Navy wherein the property was found unsuitable for use in
programs to assist the homeless.
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND
EVALUATION FACTORS
Proposals will be evaluated based on the below five factors, A through E. Offerors shall
provide the information identified below as part of the proposal, organized and
formatted as indicated. Technical and financial proposals should be concise and
provide only relevant material.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
FACTOR A: Development, Operations, and Maintenance
SUBFACTOR Al: Program Statement of Plans
Basis of Evaluation:
The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror's demonstration that the
proposed development, operations, and maintenance plans are consistent
with and responsive to the Navy vision, project objectives, and requirements
of the RFP.
Solicitation Submittal Requirement:
A detailed statement describing the areas of the property the Offeror
proposes to lease, including a plan for development, construction,
operation, management, and maintenance of the Leased and Assigned
Premises, if any. This narrative shall demonstrate compliance with the
vision in Section E.l.A, the project objectives in Section E.l.B and the
requirement in Section E.l.C. The narrative shall also include the following:
• Description of how the proposed approach, and how Navy's vision and
project objectives, will be achieved during the proposed 25-year lease
term;
• Description of the proposed development, size, type, performance or
capacity, site considerations, engineering and construction work to be
performed;
• Description of the anticipated leases, easements, agreements, permits,
etc., needed to develop and operate the proposed development;
• A development and construction plan and milestone schedule;
• A conceptual site plan depicting, identifying, and describing all
proposed improvements, including but not limited to proposed facilities,
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 15 A-18
fences, infrastructure, areas of ingress/egress , and stormwater
management areas ;
• Philosophy and specific approach to managing community relations and
interacting with applicable local and state government officials (i.e .,
zoning , environmental, CUPA, local community, etc.) for the operation
and maintenance of the Leased and Assigned Premises and any planned
improvements ;
• A conceptual environmental management plan;
• An understanding of existing natural resource-related requirements, as
described in Appendix E, "Data Pack" (to be provided at the Step 2,
RFP Phase);
• Plan to operate, manage, and maintain the Leased and Assigned
Premises for the duration of the lease and assignments, including capital
repair and replacement, grounds maintenance, and other considerations
necessary to ensure proper stewardship of the assets;
• Description of the quality control processes and corporate systems
employed to maintain quality control of the design , permitting,
financing , construction and operation of any planned improvements;
• Description of operational and property improvement impact(s), if any,
on surrounding communities , local government, and governmental
authorities ;
• Proposed conceptual emergency services plan; and
• Proposed conceptual security and access management plan.
SUBF ACTOR A2: Market Analysis and Feasibility
Basis of Evaluation:
The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror's demonstrated viability,
reasonable commercial market (non-Navy) demand, and a market
feasibility analysis for the proposed operations on the Leased and Assigned
Premises selected.
Solicitation Submittal Requirement(s):
The submitted narrative shall include at least the following:
• Substantive data and facts , which demonstrate the current and
anticipated market demand for the proposed operations and/or any
planned improvements;
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 16 A-19
• Facts and data describing the current market availability of
commercial activities/services that will compete with the market
demand for the proposed operations and/or any planned
improvements;
• Facts and data detailing projected target market consumption/use
that would result from the proposed operations and/or any planned
improvements;
• A narrative detailing the marketing strategy for the proposed
operations and/or any planned improvements.
SUBFACTOR A3: Navy Fueling Requirement and Specifications
Basis of Evaluation:
The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror's demonstration that the
infrastructure improvements and property use proposed will accommodate
the Navy's fueling requirements as described in Appendix E, "Data Pack"
(to be provided at the Step 2, RFP Phase) on the Leased Premises and
Assigned Premises selected.
Solicitation Submittal Requirement(s):
The narrative shall include the following:
• Specific description of the work to be provided to accommodate the
fueling ofNavy vessels, and associated cost estimates. As available,
the offeror shall provide no less than a "Class 4" parametric cost
estimate, with the desired objective being a "Class 3" parametric
cost estimate. Parametric cost estimating is defined in Unified
Facilities Criteria 3-740-05 paragraph 2-4. Specific guidelines for
"Class 4" estimates are described in the Association for the
Advancement of Cost Engineering Standard 56R-08 , Cost Estimate
Classification System -Building and General Construction;
• Specific description of how the Navy's fueling requirement would
be accommodated. Include a description of costs, if any, passed
through or otherwise assessed to Navy or its fuel provider( s) if the
Navy's separately competed fuel contract is awarded to an entity
other than the selected offeror;
• A description of the extent to which the proposed fueling activities
relate to the maximum allowable operational limits established for
the purpose of the EA as described in Appendix E, "Data Pack" (to
be provided at the Step 2 , RFP Phase). As applicable, include the
extent of any additional environmental analysis the offeror believes
would be required to accommodate the proposed concept.
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 17 A-20
FACTOR B: Lease Schedule and Execution
SUBF ACTOR B 1: Lease Schedule
Basis of Evaluation:
The extent to which the offeror demonstrates an understanding of the
milestones required to achieve lease execution on or before the Navy's target
lease execution date ofThursday, December 31 , 2020.
The offeror must also reasonably demonstrate an understanding of the
milestones required to sustain the proposed operations , including obtaining all
federal , state, and local permits and licenses required to meet the Navy's
schedule for the capability of fuel delivery to Pier 12 , as described in Appendix
E, "Data Pack."
Solicitation Submittal Requirement(s):
Offeror shall describe the approach, activities , and agreements necessary to
interact with the Navy and other stakeholders to achieve the above target
milestones . Offeror shall provide a corresponding schedule with critical path
milestones. Information shall include, but not be limited to the following:
• Agreements anticipated to be necessary for lease execution (such as
negotiation of transaction documents , permitting, financing, lease
closing, construction and operation, etc.);
• Permits and approvals anticipated to be necessary for the development,
construction, and operation of the Leased and Assigned Premises
(including development of a transportation management plan for
commercial truck operations , emergency access/contingency plan,
pipeline integrity management plan, etc.);
• Financing, off-take , throughput , fueling , or other such agreements
anticipated to be necessary for the development, construction, and
operation of the Leased and Assigned Premises including any planned
improvements ; and
• Offeror point of contact for all lease negotiation matters.
SUBF ACTOR B2: Lease Signature
Basis of Evaluation:
The Navy will evaluate the Offeror's ability to meet the lease requirements
set forth in the solicitation . Inability to sign the Sample Lease , to be provided
in Appendix E in the "Data Pack" (issued at the Step 2, RFP Phase), will not
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 18 A-21
necessarily remove an offeror from consideration; however, such inability
will be considered in the Risk Assessment (see Section 6.C below).
Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
Offeror will confirm the ability to sign the Sample Lease and, if unable to
sign as-is, will provide a redline copy of the Sample Lease explaining its
inability to sign, including calling out the specific provisions with which it
has issues.
FINANCIAL PROPOSAL
FACTOR C: Statement ofProject Ownership
Basis of Evaluation:
The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror's demonstrated ability to
undertake the proposed terms and conditions of the Sample Lease and
Assignments, provided in Appendix E, "Data Pack", and establish a
business structure that functions effectively over the term of the lease and
assignments.
Solicitation Submittal Requirement(s):
• Offeror shall provide a narrative detailing its ability to lease, operate,
maintain, develop, and manage the Leased and Assigned Premises .
• Offeror shall describe its history and corporate organizational structure,
including legal form of ownership and management. If the offeror is
submitting as a joint venture, or is teaming or subcontracting with other
business organizations, a narrative shall be provided of the extent to
which the team has worked together in the past, along with the relevant
teaming/joint venture agreement(s).
• Offeror shall provide documentation evidencing its legality, authority,
ownership, control, and management.
• Offeror shall explain its ability to assemble a qualified, experienced
team with the experience and workload capacity necessary to manage
all the disciplines required to develop and manage the proposed Leased
and Assigned Premises. Offeror shall detail the corporate structure of its
team.
• Offeror shall identify the key personnel and legal counsel designated
and authorized to represent the offeror in all negotiations with Navy,
and throughout the negotiations, transaction execution, and financial
closing process.
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 19 A-22
FACTOR D: Sources and Uses ofFunds
Basis of Evaluation:
The Government will evaluate the offeror's financial strength and evidence
that the company possesses the financial capability and capacity to carry out
the financial obligations and responsibilities of the proposed operations on
the Leased and Assigned Premises.
Solicitation Submittal Requirement(s):
Offerors shall submit a statement describing proposed capital and
operational funding by source. The statement shall describe proposed levels
of conventional and/or long-term debt and other partnership (or other entity)
equity. The statement shall describe the form and nature of completion and
performance guarantees to be provided to the Navy, and the resources
available to satisfy such guarantees.
• Offeror shall indicate which entity/entities are responsible for
financial performance and the extent to which corporate or other
such guarantees of performance will be provided to the Navy by
each.
• Offeror shall provide evidence of sufficient funds or financing (e .g.
letter of commitment) to support the lease and assignments and any
planned improvements.
• If improvements are proposed for the Leased Premises, as
applicable, the Offeror shall describe its approach to Payment and
Performance (P&P) bonds, provide evidence of P&P bonding
capacity, and show how the bond amount(s) are derived .
• Offeror shall provide financial statements complete with notes and
accompanied by an auditor's assertion of accuracy or reviewed by
Certified Public Accountant for the most recent two (2) complete
calendar years, 2017 and 2018, and other documentation, for the
offeror and any equity contributors or other team member
organizations or entities that will be financially accountable for
performance, in order to demonstrate the offeror's financial
strength .
• If any submitted information notes any litigation, disputes, claims,
UCC filings or similar circumstances, offeror shall describe the
current status and background of each matter in full detail and its
potential impact on the offeror's ability to fulfill the financial
obligations and responsibilities of the proposed operations on the
Leased and Assigned Premises.
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 20 A-23
FACTOR E: Financial Plan and Pro Forma
Basis of Evaluation:
The extent to which the Offeror demonstrates that the proposed operations
on the Leased and Assigned Premises are financially viable and provide
consideration to the Navy that appears realistic.
Solicitation Submittal Requirement(s):
Offeror shall provide a narrative describing relevant assumptions necessary
to understand the funding and construction planned for the Leased and
Assigned Premises. Offeror shall also provide a pro forma illustrating the
economic viability of the plans for the Leased and Assigned Premises,
described in the narrative which details all cash inflows and outflows, to
include consideration to Navy, for the entire proposed lease term. The pro
forma shall be in a Microsoft Excel file format with intact formulae so that
cell references and calculations can be verified, and contain the following
elements:
• Assumptions (i.e., schedule, square footage, rental rates, interest
rates, internal rate of return, discount rates, weighted average cost
of capital, cost of insurance, etc.)
• Development and Construction Budget including all expected hard
and soft development and construction costs.
• Operational Sources and Uses Statement that reflects all expected
transaction costs and the sources to fund these costs.
• Annual Cash Flow Statement that reflects line item revenues and
expenses on an annual basis for each year of the lease presented in
offeror's proposed order of payment priority.
• Consideration -a statement that illustrates the dollar amount of
consideration paid to Navy in each year of the lease and calculates
the net present value ofthe proposed consideration to the Navy over
the lease term.
FACTOR F: Consideration to Navy
Basis of Evaluation:
Consideration proposed to the Navy will be evaluated against the Fair
Market Value rental range determined by an Appraisal completed in 2019
for the sole use of the Navy, not available to offerors, that includes a) a
leasehold interest in one or both parcels in the Leased Premises (or
portions thereof) b) easement, permit, and right of way interests of one or
more of the fuel pipelines in the Assigned Premises (or portions thereof),
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 21 A-24
and c) use of the Navy-owned pipelines, facilities, and appurtenances on
the Leased and Assigned Premises.
The consideration will be paid in the form of IKC.
Solicitation Submittal Requirement:
A specific price/consideration proposal shall be submitted.
4. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS AND ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
The offeror's proposal shall consist of the six (6) sections indicated below, provided
behind a separate tab or divider page. Within each section, factors and subfactors
should be clearly labeled. All sections of the offeror's submittal shall be provided in a
ten ( 1 0) font size or greater.
Section Description of Section
Technical Proposal
A Development, Construction and Operations
B Lease Schedule and Execution
Financial Proposal
c Statement of Project Ownership
D Sources and Uses ofFunds
E Financial Plan and Pro Forma
F Consideration to Navy
NOTE: All sections of the proposal should be submitted on the same disk/CD ROM .
A. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
The offeror shall mark all information that is proprietary and not releasable to the public
as proprietary.
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 22 A-25
B. OFFEROR'S COVER PAGE
The offeror's proposal must include a completed Cover Page which shall consist of a
completed and signed copy of Appendix D to this RFP.
C. SUBMISSION
Proposals are due at 1 :00 PM Pacific Daylight Time on the date and at the address
specified below. The words "REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO.
N6247321RP006" must appear clearly and legibly on the proposal package. In
addition , the sealed package should be labeled with the offeror's name , address,
contact person, and time specified for the receipt.
Proposals must be received No Later Than :
Time: 1 :00 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Date : August 14 , 2020
Six (6) copies and one signed original of the Proposal , plus one CD copy, shall be
submitted in sealed packages addressed to:
If submitted via U.S. Mail:
Department of the Navy
Attn: Kimberly Spencer, Real Estate B127
1220 Pacific Highway
San Diego , CA 92132-6186
If submitted via a Parcel Delivery Service:
Attn: Kimberly Spencer, Real Estate B127
Department of the Navy
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest
1220 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 92132-6186
Email delivery confirmation to Kimberly Spencer at
Kimberly.spencer@navy.mil, and include a soft copy of the proposal package
in the email.
Electronic or facsimile offers or modifications will not be considered. Any
submission received after the time and date specified above will be rejected.
All inquiries concerning any part of this RFP shall be made to Kimberly Spencer at
kimberly.spencer@navy.mil.
NOTE: Inquiries and Requests for Information (RFI) shall be submitted in writing
no later than fourteen ( 14) business days prior to bid due date .
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 23 A-26
5. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
A. SOURCE SELECTION
It is the intent of the Navy that after a thorough review and evaluation of all
responsive proposals received, a single offeror will be selected for negotiation of
the lease and assignments (if any), and ultimate award. The selected offeror for the
period of negotiations will be that offeror whose proposal provides the best overall
value to the Navy and is determined to be most advantageous to the Navy; provided,
however, that the Navy may at its option , and without any liability, choose to reject
any and all proposals without justification.
B. EVALUATION PROCESS
A Navy evaluation team comprised of civilian employees of the Navy and
uniformed military personnel will evaluate each proposal. The team will determine
the overall value of the proposal to the Navy, based on the factors set forth in
Section E.3, "Proposal Submission Requirements and Evaluation Factors ," and
Section E.5.C below, "Proposal Risk Assessments." Proposals will be evaluated on
their own merit, independently and objectively. Factors A through F are
approximately equal in importance. The degree of importance of consideration
(Factor F) offered to the Navy could become greater depending upon the equality
of the proposals for other factors and subfactors evaluated. In order to ensure fair
and reasonable consideration, the offeror's proposed consideration will be
compared to the Fair Market Value rental range determined in the Appraisal of the
leasehold interest and assignments, completed in 2019 . The Appraisal is for the sole
use of the Navy and is not available to offerors. Award will be made to the
responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best
value to the Navy, consideration and non-consideration factors and subfactors
considered.
C. PROPOSAL RISK ASSESSMENTS
The Navy will evaluate risk by assessing the likelihood that the offeror will be able
to satisfy the requirements of this RFP and be able to carry out the development ,
maintenance , operations and other plans as proposed. A proposal will be considered
to be low risk ifthere appears to be little likelihood that the offeror will be unable to
satisfy the requirements of this RFP or carry out its proposal. Conversely, a proposal
will be considered to be high risk if there appears to be a substantial likelihood that
the offeror will be unable to satisfy the requirements of this RFP or carry out its
proposal.
D. ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Oral discussions with all offerors who submit proposals are not anticipated . At the
Navy's option, however, offerors may be required to present their proposals orally
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 24 A-27
to a Navy evaluation team in the event that the Navy decides to include all or several
offerors in a competitive range for subsequent discussions.
E. NEGOTIATIONS PERIOD
During the negotiations period, the selected offeror shall: (i) negotiate with the Navy
on the lease agreement and pipeline assignments , if any; (ii) pursue local approval,
permitting, and develop plans, as applicable, and (iii) pursue additional , required
project or environmental documentation, as needed.
Negotiations of the Sample Lease , provided in Appendix E, "Data Pack" in the Step
2 RFP Phase, may result in terms and conditions that differ from the terms and
conditions originally submitted by the offeror. This does not mean that a new offer
has been submitted as the basic framework of the original offer shall remain the
same.
The Navy requires the selected offeror to provide adequate and appropriate
personnel resources, including supporting firms and organizations, during the
negotiations period in order to efficiently and expeditiously carry out the
negotiations and related document preparation and development. The decision to
implement and execute the lease will be made solely by the Navy at its discretion.
In the event the Navy and the selected offeror cannot agree on implementing the
lease or other required documents, or if the lease is not accepted by Navy
Headquarters, the Navy, at its sole option, may terminate negotiations with the
selected offeror and direct the selected offeror to cease all work on the project.
If the selected offeror's participation in this leasing opportunity is terminated, the
Navy shall not be responsible for the payment of any fees or have any liability,
financial or otherwise, to the selected offeror. Additionally, the Navy shall have the
right , at no cost to itself, to make full use of the work products and to proceed to
negotiate and work with a replacement offeror.
F. LEGAL DOCUMENTATION
To operate on or perform improvements on the Leased and Assigned Premises,
certain legal agreements and transaction documents will be necessary or required.
The selected offeror shall prepare and provide all agreements, documents and
information requested by the Navy that are reasonably necessary or otherwise
required.
G. PROVISIONS
Offerors are required to comply with the following instructions while developing a
proposal. Where instructions conflict, and no order of precedence is specified, the
most stringent requirement applies. A reference to, or direction to comply with, a
particular Section shall include, as appropriate, all subsections thereunder. Oral
explanations or instructions will not be binding.
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 25 A-28
Additional provisions the offeror should note include:
• The information provided by the offeror may be used by the Navy to
conduct a comprehensive background and credit check.
• The offeror may joint venture with another party. A joint venture shall
meet the following requirements :
o All proposals submitted by joint ventures must include an original
of the executed joint venture agreement.
o Members of the joint venture must sign the lease.
• The Concourse Group, LLC ("TCG") is serving as an advisor to the Navy
on this project (and has recused itself from the competition). Each offeror
must certify they are not using nor have they used TCG, or any of its
subcontractors or affiliates , to assist in the preparation of any proposal
related to this project. A "no-conflict-of-interest" certification to be
executed by the offeror and returned with its proposal is included as part of
the offeror's cover page in Appendix D.
H. AMENDMENTS TO THE RFP
This RFP may be amended by one or more formal amendment document(s),
letter(s), or electronic message(s). If this RFP is amended, then all terms and
conditions, which are not modified, remain unchanged.
I. QUESTIONS
At the discretion of the Navy, clarifying questions may be asked via email,
regarding specifics within offeror's proposal. Clarifying questions may be asked of
any or all offerors. Offerors are required to submit written submissions in response
to clarifying questions, limited to material requested in the clarifying questions.
F. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
1. NO OBLIGATION
While the Navy intends to enter into a lease and assignments with an offeror
selected through the process set forth in this solicitation, the Navy is under no
obligation to do so . The Navy reserves the right to cancel this solicitation at any
time, or to reject any and all submissions prepared in response to this solicitation.
2. HOLD HARMLESS
By participating in the solicitation process, offerors agree to hold the United States
of America, its officers, employees, and advisors harmless from all claims ,
liabilities, and costs related to all aspects of this RFQ/RFP. Under no circumstances
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 26 A-29
shall the United States of America be liable for any "bid and proposal" costs, real
estate brokerage commissions, finder's fees, or other forms of compensation related
in any way to activities undertaken by any person as a result of the submission of
the RFQ SOQ /RFP proposal.
3. WAIVER
The Navy reserves the right to waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers
received if it is determined that it is in its best intere st to do so .
4. RIGHTS RESERVED
The Navy reserves any and all rights in connection with this solicitation, including,
but not limited to, the right to hold negotiations with a selected offeror which may
result in terms and conditions that differ from those specified in this solicitation
and/or from terms and conditions originally proposed by the offeror. Furthermore ,
the Navy reserves the right to terminate negotiations with the selected offeror, and
initiate negotiations with another suitable offeror if the Navy, at its sole discretion,
determines that the Navy will be unable to successfully conclude negotiations with
the selected offeror. The decision to execute a lease will be made by the Navy at
its discretion. In no event will the Navy be responsible for the payment of any fees
or have any liability to any offeror for fees or expenses incurred in connection with
submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation or during negotiations .
5. NAVY-FURNISHED INFORMATION
The Navy does not warrant the accuracy of any site-related information provided.
Site-related information furnished by the Navy and/or its representatives in support
of this solicitation shall be considered as informational only . Such information may
include historical utilities usage quantities , locations and capacities of existing
utility systems , technical reports and studies , building conditions reports , or other
technical information intended to support the offerors' development applications.
Offerors are expected to verify all site-related information provided by the Navy to
avoid unforeseen costs.
6. DISPUTES
All disputes arising under or related to this solicitation, which are not disposed of
by agreement , shall be resolved and decided by the Navy pursuant to the Contract
Disputes Act of 1978, as amended, (41 U.S.C. § 601-613). The Navy shall mail or
otherwise furnish a written copy of the decision to the offeror.
7. ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS
This acquisition is not governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR").
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 27 A-30
8. PROTECTION AFFORDED TO PROPRIETARY OR
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Information contained in materials submitted to this solicitation may be afforded
protection from public disclosure if the offeror identifies the same as "proprietary"
or "confidential" with supporting justification, and requests such protection at the
time of submission. Each page that is considered proprietary or confidential must
be clearly marked as such .
9. DAVIS-BACON ACT
Davis-Bacon wage requirements apply to elements of projects constructed on
behalf of the Navy. Davis Bacon wage requirements may apply to specific IKC
projects constructed for the Navy's sole benefit. The wage decision in effect at the
time that the selected offeror is designated and invited to a period of exclusive
negotiations with the Navy will be incorporated into the lease and appropriate
subsidiary agreements.
G. POINTS OF CONTACT FOR INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATIONS
All questions, clarifications and general information requests shall be submitted in writing
to:
Office Name Address E-mail
Naval Facilities Ms. Kimberly 1220 Pacific
Engineering Spencer Highway
Kimberly .spencer@navy .mil Command, Senior Real Estate San Diego, CA Southwest Specialist 92132-6186
Naval Facilities Mr. Jeff Burke 1220 Pacific
Engineering Highway
Command, Senior Facilities San Diego, CA
Jeffrey.s.burke@navy.mil
Southwest Planner 92132-6186
SOLICITATION NO . N6247321RP006 28 A-31
c::J Installation
r Licensed Areas (Not Part of the Project Area)
=Highway
--, 1 __ 1 City Boundary
0.5
••••••• C:C:C:C:C:C:::J M il es
DFSP San Pedro Property Available for Lease and Assignment
Long Beach Pipelines (JP-5, JP-8)
R-Line
-G-Line
Los Angeles
County
Appendix A
Page 1 of 2
S.o
Bernardino
County
A-32
0 Building LEGEND
• Gate
------· Fence
0 Monitoring Wells
Q Aboveground Storage Tank
e Underground Storage Tank
D IRPSites
'//// 'l' // Listed Species Management Area
Habitat Opportunity Area
J llll#
-:: Area available for use -, ... !()
0 Proposed Lease Boundary:
3 11 Ac Main Terminal ;
11.06 Ac Marin e Termin al
Fault Line
Fuel Pipeline
Area Restricted for Use Until:
U FY 2022
~ FY2023
~ FY2024
0 Semi-Restricted for use until FY 2021
Outgrant Fuel Pipeline Right of Way
Outgrant Water Easement
Outgrant Sewer Easement
SCALE 1 inch = 325 feet
Feet
0 112.5 225 450 675 900
Miles
0 0 .0150.03 0 .06 0 .09 0 .12 0 .15
Meters
0 25 50 100 150 200
ELLIP SO ID ............ GEODET IC REFE RENC E SYST EM 1980
PR OJECTION .................... CA STAT E PL AN E ZONE V I
HOR IZONTAL DATUM ..................... NAD 83/WGS 1984
NAD 83/WGS 84
THE NORTH AM ERICAN DATUM 1983 (NAD83) AND THE WOR LD
GEODET IC SYSTEM 1984 DATUM (WGS 1984) ARE EQ UI VALENT FOR
MAPPING, CHARTI NG, AN D NAVIGATI ON AT TH IS SCALE.
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
TH IS MAP AND DATA CONTAINED HEREIN IS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. ALL DATA SHOWN IS
CONSIDERED U NCLASSIFIED SENS IT IVE UPON AGGREGATION . REPRODUCT ION .
DISTRIBUTION, PUBLICAT ION , OR EXHIB IT ION OF THIS DATA IS STRICTLY PROH I BITED
W ITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE NAVAL WEAPONS STAT ION-SEAL BEAC H
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM OFFICE , (NWSSBG IS).
ALTHOUG H EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY OF THE
INFORMATION , ERRORS AND CO N DITIONS ORIG INATING FROM PHYSICAL SO URCES TO
DEVELOP THE DATABASE MAY BE REFLECTED IN THE DATA SUPP LI ED . THE USER MUST BE
AWARE OF DATA COND ITIONS AND ULTIMATE LY BEAR RESPONS I BI LI TY FOR THE
APPROPRIATE USE OF THE INFORMATION WITH
RESPECT TO POSS IBLE ERRORS, OR IGINAL MAP SCALE, COLLECTION METHODOLOGY,
CURRENCY OF THE DATA , AND OTHER COND IT IONS SPEC IFIC TO CERTAIN DATA . TH IS
INFORMATION DOES NOT DEP ICT ALL POSSIBLE RESOURCES. FIELD VERI FICATION OF ALL
DATA IS REQU IRED FOR SITE SPECIFIC PROJECTS . T HIS IN FORMATION IS DEEMED
RELI ABLE , BUT NOT GUARANTEED .
0
NWSSB GIS
800 Seal Bea ch Blvd., Seal Be ac h, CA 90740
Bldg .# 2 30
Phone: 562 .6 26.7112
and rea.baratie@ navy.mil
Ma p Publi s he d: 10/1/201 8
GRC Edits 03/11 /20 19
NWSSB
DFSP San Pedro Property Available for
Lease
Appendix A
Pa e 2 of 2 A-33
Appendix B
DFSP SAN PEDRO PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS AVAILABLE
FOR LEASE AND ASSIGNMENT
This appendix describes existing property and improvements associated with the Leased and
Assigned Premises available. Information and/or documents pertaining to the property and
provided to prospective offerors are believed to be correct; however, the Navy does not warrant
this information. The available Leased and Assigned Premises, detailed below, will be offered
"as is, where is" and the Navy does not warrant the condition of any of the land, structures ,
equipment, etc. offered for lease or assignment.
The Leased Premises consists of two parcels: 1) the approximately 311-acre Main Terminal, with
onsite pipelines and improvements, and 2) the approximately 11-acre Marine Terminal, with
onsite pipelines and improvements . The Assigned Premises consists of a network of
approximately 14 miles of offsite pipeline and associated rights of way corridors .
THE LEASED PREMISES
THE MAIN TERMINAL
An approximately 311-acre fuel depot located in San Pedro , California
• Located at 3171 North Gaffey Street on the eastern slope of Palos Verdes Hills,
between Gaffey Street and Western Avenue, in the City of San Pedro.
• Primarily located in the City of San Pedro, California, County of Los Angeles, while
a small portion is located in the City ofLomita. It is surrounded by the cities of Carson
and Torrance to the north, City ofLong Beach to the east, the community of San Pedro
to the south, and the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes and Palos Verdes Estates to the
west. The Main Terminal is located approximately 20 miles southwest of the City of
Los Angeles urban center.
• Land uses around the Main Terminal primarily include residential properties to the
north, south , and west. A cemetery borders the Main Terminal on its western
boundary, and a high school borders the facility to the south. A local community
college and commercial fueling operations border the Main Terminal to the east.
• Primary improvements include administrative facilities, storage facilities, guardhouse
and main gate, magazines , and extensive fueling infrastructure including aboveground
fuel storage tanks, truck rack, pump house, pipelines, and closed underground fuel
storage tanks.
o 3 Above ground storage tanks (~6M gal/165,000 barrels with a shell
capacity/design capacity of ~150,000 barrels)
o 27 underground storage tanks (USTs) -permanently closed, with some
locations in remediation
Page 1 of3
A-34
o Pump House (Building 113)
o Tank Truck Loading Facility (Building 115)
o Valve pits, pipelines, and various valves for product transfer into and out
of the terminal
o Administrative Facility (Building 1 00)
o Fire Water Tank and Pump Station (Building 70 and Building 250)
o Entry Control Point (Building 120)
o Perimeter Fencing
• Multiple Navy and DLA environmental remediation sites, with remediation
anticipated to complete by 2025
• Habitat for Palos Verdes blue butterfly (federally endangered) and Coastal California
gnatcatcher (federally threatened)
• The adjacent ball fields and firing range are NOT included within the proposed Leased
Premises boundary.
THE MARINE TERMINAL
An approximately 11-acre fuel terminal and fuel pier (Pier 12) located in Long Beach,
California.
• The Marine Terminal is located within the Port of Long Beach and adjacent to the Port
of Los Angeles. The Marine Terminal is located on Nimitz Road on the former Long
Beach Naval Station Mole Pier on Terminal Island in Long Beach, California.
• Primary improvements include the fuel pier, office and lab controls building, a
multipurpose building that includes locker rooms, electrical distribution equipment,
and a fire pump control room , and extensive fueling infrastructure including
aboveground fuel storage tanks, pump house, fire water tank , substation, and
pipelines.
o 1,066linear foot concrete pier (Facility 851) that is 65 feet wide and rated
with a 400 pounds per square foot loading capacity;
o Pump House (Building 834)
o Valve pits, pipelines, and various valves for product transfer into and out
of the terminal
o Office/Laboratory and Controls Facility (Building 833)
o Multipurpose Facility including a fire pump room, locker/changing rooms,
diesel backup generator, etc. (Building 832)
o 3 Above ground storage tanks ( ~ 2 .5M gal/60,000 barrels with a shell
capacity/design capacity of ~54.5 barrels)
Page 2 of3
A-35
o 8 Above ground storage tanks -settling tanks previously used to clean up
fuels and waste products
o Fire Water Tank and Facility (Building 301 and Building 835)
o Perimeter Fencing.
THE ASSIGNED PREMISES
Approximately 14 miles ofNavy-owned offsite fuel pipelines serve the Leased Premises.
The Navy holds a series of permits, easements, and other rights of way from the property
owners for the installation, operation, repair, and maintenance of the Navy-owned
pipelines. The Navy's interests in the pipelines are proposed to be assigned to the Selected
Offeror under two assignment agreements, to be executed simultaneously with the lease.
The term of the pipeline assignments will be coterminous with the term of the lease. The
Navy had a survey performed in 2018, identifying the Navy's property interests for its
fuel pipelines, and identifying gaps in property interest. The Navy is working to secure
the proper real property interest for its pipelines in several areas,. The fuel pipelines
proposed for assignment consist of the following:
LONG BEACH PIPELINES
Two 14-to 18-inch fuel pipelines commonly referred to as the "Long Beach" pipelines or
the "JP-5" and "JP-8" pipelines . The Long Beach pipelines connect the Main Terminal to
the Marine Terminal ( ~ 11 miles).
G-LINE
An 8-inch fuel pipeline commonly referred to as the "G" pipeline , running offsite from
the Main Terminal to the east ( ~.67 miles).
R-LINE
A 12-inch fuel pipeline commonly referred to as the "R" pipeline, running offsite from
the Main Terminal to the east (~2.49 miles).
NOTE:
The G, R, and Long Beach pipelines are the pipelines available for assignment to the
selected offeror. If the Navy acquires interest in additional pipelines in the future, such as
a fuel pipeline running north, from DFSP San Pedro toward Norwalk, California, the
selected offeror may be offered assignment of the Navy's interest.
Page 3 of3
A-36
aval Facil ties Engineering Command
NAVFAC SOUTHWEST
A/E Contract No.: N62473-15-D-2401
Delivery Order No. N6247318F4928
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT (FCA) FOR
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION SEAL BEACH DFSP
SAN PEDRO SPECIAL AREA
11 February 2019
Submitted ttw:
-Austin Brockenbrough
E N GINEE R ING + CO N SULT IN G
1011 Boulder Springs Drive, Suite 200
Richmond, VA 23225
www.brockenbrough.com
Brockenbrough Job No . 18-063
Updated and Edited by:
7 October 2019
Appendix C A-37
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Austin Brockenbrough & Associates, LLP (Brockenbrough) was retained by Naval Facilities Engineering
Command, Southwest Division, under A&E Contract No. N62473-15-D-2401 Delivery Order No .
N6247318F4928 to perform a Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) at the San Pedro Fuel Depot and
Long Beach Fuel Complex Special Areas under Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach (NWSSB), CA.
Representatives from Brockenbrough conducted a site visit from August 27 through 30, 2018 to perform
a field survey and system evaluation of the existing facilities. The primary fueling areas investigated
were:
1. San Pedro Fuel Depot
2. Long Beach Pier 12
3. Transfer Pipelines
The analysis of the facilities included mechanical, electrical, architectural, and civil specialists.
Additionally, all available documentation, including drawings, reports, and other applicable items with
information regarding the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) capitalized fuel facilities were reviewed.
DFSP San Pedro's fueling systems are Government Owned Contractor Operated (GOCO) facilities. DFSP
San Pedro was officially placed in a temporary closure status February 22, 2016, with all fuel removed
from the facility at that time. As part of this temporary closure, all storage tanks are empty and
physically disconnected from piping. System pumps have also been disconnected from piping and
electrical and control systems have also been disabled with some key control system components
removed and requiring replacement. All underground storage tanks (cut-and-cover) have been
permanently decommissioned with the tanks and piping abandoned in place and filled with a low
strength concrete .
The remaining San Pedro and Long Beach facilities are in a state of Temporary Closure and were
generally found to be in Marginal Mission Capable condition after years of inactivity. No urgent repairs
were identified that would need to be performed immediately to prevent a release of product to the env
-ironment, would endanger worker health or safety, or would adversely affect fuel quality. There
were several items noted, however, that should be addressed in a timely manner to improve overall
system efficiency or bring the systems in compliance with applicable codes and standards. Due to the
temporary closure status, many facilities are physically disconnected and require repair to become
active. Additional service and maintenance type repairs, such as replacing seals, gaskets, and other
wetted materials, will be required before the system can be brought back into service.
Executive Summary page i A-38
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
"Immediate" repairs are repairs that are recommended be addressed immediately, when
regulatory approval is granted for the renewal of fuel operations, as they are necessary repairs for fuel to
be provided to the Pier 12 berths.
For some fuel complex systems and components, the timeline for commissioning may
require up to 6 months after the award of the commercial outlease. This could be for repair items
such as electronic control systems and/or valves complying with the lessee's standardization program
and/or engineering standard and/or i ntegrated logistics support requirements. In this report, "Urgent
repairs" is defined as those repairs that are required for systems , components, or equipment that are
estimated/anticipated to fail within 6 months.
If the repair item would be a high-risk, long-lead-time-issue to repair, the repair is to be considered
an "Urgent" or "Immediate" issue to resolve. If it would become a single point of failure or
otherwise prevent COMPACFLT's fueling requirements from being fulfilled, the issue is also
considered "Urgent" or "Immediate ."
In this report, "Short-term repairs" are considered those that could
be completed within 2 years. "Long-term repairs" in this report are considered those that
would be anticipated to require completion after two years .
Note: This report was updated and edited on 7 Oct 19 to identify the Government facility repair plan
for DFSP San Pedro. Several facility deficiencies documented in the
report are being addressed by the Government through the award of a construction contract in FY20.
When a timeframe to repair is available, the Government will provide it to the Selected Offeror.
The repair items identified in Attachment (1) are planned to be repaired by the Government.
Executive Summary page ii A-39
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... i
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION ....................................................................................................... 4
1. DFSP San Pedro Facility Condition Assessment.. ......................................................................... 4
2. Planned Future Projects .............................................................................................................. 6
B. FUEL SYSTEM OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 7
1. San Pedro Fuel Depot .................................................................................................................. 8
2. Long Beach Marine Terminal Overview ..................................................................................... 27
C. SUMMARY OF CONDITION RATINGS .................................................................................................. 35
D. EXISTING DEFICIENCIES SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 39
E. NEW DEFICIENCIES ............................................................................................................................. 40
1. San Pedro Fuel Depot ................................................................................................................ 41
2. Long Beach Marine Terminal ..................................................................................................... 82
F. ATIACHMENT (1)-Deficiency List by Urgency of Repair .................................................................. 105
G. ATIACHMENT (2)-Facility Condition of Pipelines ............................................................................ 126
Table of Contents page iii A-40
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
This page is intended to be blank
page 4 A-41
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
1. DFSP San Pedro Facility Condition Assessment
This project entailed a comprehensive Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) of all Petroleum, Oils, &
Lubricants (POL) Facility Assets located at DFSP San Pedro, as directed by NAVFAC Southwest under
A/E Contract No. N62473-15-D-2401, Delivery Order N6247318F4928. DLA has placed the site in a
temporary closure status so most facilities require minor maintenance and repair work to re-
activate the system. In addition, other facilities require repair work to demolish and/or abandon
facilities in place to optimize the complex. This assessment was completed by conducting a
thorough inspection of all facility assets, validating any existing deficiencies that were previously
identified, and identifying new deficiencies. Deficiencies identified are rated for impact on mission
capability and urgency and are provided with repair recommendations.
DFSP San Pedro is a unique facility to assess because it has been placed in a temporary closure status
since February 22, 2016 and currently does not store, receive, or issue fuel as the complex is in a
temporary closure status and will require re-activation . Due to this status all fuel tanks are empty
and clean, the pumps & piping are disconnected, and many facilities are permanently
decommissioned. The Government is currently considering an out-lease,
which would allow a third-party entity to operate, maintain, and otherwise utilize the fuel depot
and fuel pier, provided the projects are compatible with the complex's military fueling functions,
particularly the capability for Navy vessels, ships, and barges to receive fuel at the Marine Terminal.
The objective of this Facility Condition Assessment is to document the current condition of the
facilities for all concerned parties, identify facility deficiencies and the priority for the remediation of
individual deficiencies to return the complex to operations. This document, including the deficiency
table provided in Appendix A, has been developed for identification of repair work (including
demolition work) needed to sustain the fuel complex.
General Project Information page 5 A-42
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
a. Current Condition Rating
For each facility/major component of the fueling system a "Current Condition Rating" is
assigned to describe the overall fit for service level of the facility. Due to the temporary closure
status of the site described above, a dual condition rating will be assigned to the applicable
facilities. The applicable condition ratings are:
• Fully Mission Capable: A serviceable facility that has no problems and/or warrants no
immediate repairs, reactivation, or refurbishment, contains no impact to the environment,
and meets all safety requirements.
• Degraded Mission Capable: Facility has some necessary repairs, reactivation, or
refurbishment that impact the facility capabilities, but in a manner that presents a low
probability of reducing mission capabilities.
• Marginal Mission Capable: Facility has necessary repairs, reactivation, or refurbishment
that have degraded the system operation, environmental impact, and/or safety that
presents a high probability of reducing mission capabilities.
• Non-Mission Capable: Facility requires repair, reactivation, or refurbishment. If
modifications are not made, facility will remain out of service and pose a certainty of
reducing mission capabilities.
• Temporary Closure: Facility temporarily closed and deactivated; not operable without
reactivation. If modifications are not made, the facility will remain out of service and pose
a certainty of reducing mission capabilities.
b. Priority Rating
All work recommended as a noted deficiency is assigned a "Priority Rating" to facilitate
execution of the most needed projects in the shortest amount of time. The applicable priority
ratings are :
• Immediate: Project must be completed immediately to allow facility or structure to
perform intended use .
• Urgent: If project is not completed, facility will likely not be able to perform intended use
within 6 months.
• Short Term: If project is not completed, facility will likely not be able to perform intended
use within 2 years.
• Long Term: Project deferral for more than two years will likely not impact intended use of
the facility but the repair work or sustainment work is required per the recommended
timeline to avoid future immediate, urgent, or short-term repairs in the next thirty years,
the Government-imposed economic analysis period for this FCA.
General Project Information page 6 A-43
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
This page is intended to be blank
General Project Information page 7 A-44
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
B. FUEL SYSTEM OVERVIEW
DFSP San Pedro is comprised of two sites, the 311-acre Main Terminal in San Pedro and the 8.3-acre
Marine Terminal in Long Beach, and the associated 14-1/2 miles of pipelinesrunning between these
two sites and to non-Government sites. These facilities were used to issue, receive, and store fuel
from marine vessels, tank trucks, and crosstown pipelines. The products most recently used at DFSP
San Pedro were JP-5, JP-8, F-76 and fuel system icing inhibitor (FSII).
The Fuel Depot in San Pedro is comprised of five main areas: The Administration Area, the Magazine
Area, the Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Area, the Underground Storage Tank (UST) Area, and the
South Control Area. The Fuel Depot is where the majority of fuel storage, transfer, loading, and
daily operations take place.
The Marine Terminal in Long Beach is comprised of two areas, the Administration Area and the Pier
12 Area. The Marine Terminal is where ships are loaded and unloaded, and also includes some
ancillary storage, transfer, and administrative capabilities.
Fuel is supplied and issued from the depot using three inter-terminal pipelines: the 10-inch
Government line to/from Norwalk that is Air Force-owned, the 12-inch" 'R' Line to/from
Wilmington, and the 8-inch 'G' Line to/from the south side of the adjacent Phillips 66 property. No
direct assessment of these underground lines was conducted as part of this site visit. Existing
reports and discussions with Government personnel were the source of information for these
underground transfer lines. While the 10-inch Government line is reported to be in nitrogen
blanket layup and good condition, the condition of the other two pipelines is unknown.
Additionally, there are two 14"/18" pipelines that connect the Fuel Depot and Marine Terminal
properties which were reportedly in good condition.
14" Lines between
San Pedro & Long
Beach
Fuel System Overview page 8 A-45
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
1. San Pedro Fuel Depot
The Fuel Depot in San Pedro is comprised of five main areas: The Administration Area, the Magazine
area, the AST Area, the UST Area, and the South Control Area . The Fuel Depot is where the majority of
fuel storage, transfer, loading, and daily operations take place.
Fuel is supplied and issued from the depot using three inter-terminal pipelines: the 10-inch
Government pipeline to/from Norwalk that is Air Force owned, the 12-inch" 'R' Line to/from
Wilmington, and the 8-inch 'G' Line to/from the south side of the adjacent Phillips 66 property.
Information on the integrity of the underground piping within the site and the inter-terminal pipelines
has been based on information gathered from other testing and evaluation performed outside of this
assessment.
Fuel System Overview page 9 A-46
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
San Pedro Fuel Depot Overview
Fuel System Overview page 10 A-47
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
a. San Pedro Fuel Depot-Administration Area
The Administration Area is the hub of activity for the San Pedro Fuel Depot. It consists of the
main offices, the transfer pumphouse and loading stations. Most of the systems were first
constructed in the 1940s and have been upgraded multiple times since.
Fuel System Overview
Facility 56A, 68
Abandoned Diesel
Storage Tanks
Facility 59, 60
AV Fuels
Sample Bldg
Facility 116
Abandoned
Drum Fill Plant
Facility 117
Main Gate &
San Pedro Fuel Depot, Administration Area
page 11 A-48
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
The primary facilities of the Administration Area consist of administrative buildings, two FSII
aboveground storage tanks, a commercial pipeline receipt manifold and pumphouse, a JP-5 &
JP-8 tank truck loading facility, an abandoned drum fill plant, and a fire pump station and
storage tank.
The Administration Building (Facility 100) is a 9,755 sq ft building originally built in 1942 and
consists of conference rooms and office areas. The Contractor Administration Building (Facility
103) is a 6,000 sq ft building originally built in 1952 and consists of office and maintenance
areas. Two storage buildings, Facilities 107 and 108, are abandoned and unsafe for use . There
is also a 50,000 gallon Fire Water Tank and Fire Pump Station .
The pumphouse (Facility 113) consists of eight pumps. Pumps 1-2 are primarily used for issuing
through the 10" Government pipeline (also known as the Kinder Morgan pipeline); each pump is
rated for 850 GPM at 1,282 ft of head . Pumps 3-8, manufactured in 1953, are primarily used for
pier receipt boosting to the product tanks in the Fuel Depot; each pump is rated for 1,166 GPM
at 454ft of head.
Adjacent to the pumphouse is a large piping manifold that is used to issue/receive fuel between
the aboveground storage tanks, underground storage tanks when they were active, the fuel
pier, and the crosstown pipelines. Through different valve configurations, any of the eight
pumps may be used in any service as required . Due to the underground storage tanks being
permanently decommissioned, a large portion of this manifold could be eliminated to optimize
operations and accessibility.
There are three 600 GPM horizontal filter/separators in the JP-5 & JP-8 piping supply to the tank
truck loading facility (Facility 115). There are also two FSII additive tanks (Facility Numbers 56A
& 68) of 8,000 gal & 10,000 gal capacities with the FSII injectors located downstream of the
filter/separators . Facility 115 is a six-position tank truck loading facility that can issue to two
tank trucks simultaneously.
North ofthe truck loading facility is an abandoned and partially demolished drum fill plant
(Facility 117). The drum fill plant consists of vertical filter/separators, vertical relaxation tanks, a
drum fill pipe manifold, and two abandoned 12,000-gal diesel storage tanks (Facility Numbers 59
& 60).
Fuel System Overview page 12 A-49
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
POL Ops Center I Pumphouse, Facility 113
JP-5 I JP-8 Tank Truck Loading, Facility 115
Fuel System Overview page 13 A-50
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
FSII Tanks, Facility Numbers 56A & 68
Abandoned Drum Fill Plant, Facility 117
Fuel System Overview page 14 A-51
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Administration Building, Facility 100
Contractor Administration Building, Facility 103
Fuel System Overview page 15 A-52
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Fire Water Tank & Pump Station, Facility Numbers 70 & 250
Abandoned Storage Building, Facility 107
Fuel System Overview page 16 A-53
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Abandoned Storage Building, Facility 108
Abandoned Diesel Storage Tanks, Facility Numbers 59 & 60
Fuel System Overview page 17 A-54
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
b. San Pedro Fuel Depot-Magazine Area
The Magazine Area consists of several concrete munitions magazines and bunkers built into the
hillsides near the facility roads . These magazines are largely abandoned with some magazines
being used for miscellaneous storage . In general, the concrete magazine structures are in fair
condition, while the doors are in poor condition. These magazines could potentially be used for
miscellaneous storage and critical spare parts storage in the future .
Facilities 313, 314
San Pedro Fuel Depot, Magazine Area
Fuel System Overview page 18 A-55
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Magazine, Facility 301
Magazine, Facility 302
Fuel System Overview page 19 A-56
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Magazine, Facility 303
Magazine, Facility 305
Fuel System Overview page 20 A-57
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Row of Magazines, Facility Numbers 307 -312
Personnel Shelters, Facility Numbers 313 & 314
Fuel System Overview page 21 A-58
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Magazine, Facility 315
Magazine , Facility 316
Fuel System Overview page 22 A-59
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
c. San Pedro Fuel Depot-Aboveground Storage Tank Area
The Aboveground Storage Tank Area consists of three 55,000 bbl JP-8 storage tanks originally
built in 1954 to the prevailing standard of that time. All three tanks are 100'00 x 40'H and
feature a floating roof with no external roof and a small water draw-off system. The
underground piping between the AST Area and the Administration Area is currently
disconnected and out of service. All three tanks share a common secondary containment that
features vertical concrete walls, intermediate berms, vehicle access, and an HDPE liner that was
installed in 2012.
The tanks were examined and found to be in generally good condition. API 653 Out-of-Service
Inspection Reports for each tank were submitted in February 2018 by Pond under Pond Project
Number 110096. These reports found no immediate repairs that must be completed prior to
returning the tank to service but identified numerous repairs that should be implemented in the
near-future.
San Pedro Fuel Depot, Aboveground Storage Tank Area
Fuel System Overview page 23 A-60
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
48
l ·.
JP-8 Aboveground Storage Tank #48
JP-8 AST Water Draw-off System & Piping
Fuel System Overview page 24 A-61
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
AST Area Secondary Containment
Fuel System Overview page 25 A-62
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
d. San Pedro Fuel Depot-Underground Storage Tank Area
The Underground Storage Tank Area consists of two groups of underground tanks. The "20
Series" tanks features 20 concrete cut & cover tanks while the "40 Series" tanks features six
steel cut-and-cover tanks. All of these tanks have been permanently decommissioned with the
tanks and piping filled with low strength concrete. There are two abandoned aboveground POL
waste storage tanks, Facility Numbers 53 & 54, which are planned to be demolished .
are facility numbers
San Pedro Fuel Depot, Underground Storage Tank Area
Fuel System Overview page 26 A-63
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
e. San Pedro Fuel Depot-South Control Area
The South Control Area consists of several pumphouses associated with the "20 Series" and "40
Series" underground storage tanks . As part of the decommissioning of the USTs all of the
pumphouses in the South Control Area have also been decommissioned. Aboveground piping
associated with Pumphouse 200 has also been removed.
San Pedro Fuel Depot, South Control Area
Fuel System Overview page 27 A-64
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
2. Long Beach Marine Terminal Overview
The Marine Terminal consists of two areas: The Administration Area and the Pier 12 Area. It is
primarily used to receive fuel but has the capability to issue fuel from the AST Area in San Pedro by
gravity as well. The Administration Area consists of numerous temporarily closed ASTs, a controls
& office/lab building, pumphouse, and a multi-purpose building. The Pier 12 Area consists of a
1,060 ft pier with three off-loading/loading arm stations, two dock watch buildings, and a
boathouse.
Long Beach Marine Terminal Overview
Fuel System Overview page 28 A-65
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
a. Long Beach Marine Terminal -Administration Area
The Administration Area consists of administrative buildings, a pumphouse, an oil/water
separator, and numerous aboveground storage tanks.
The office/lab & operations building (Facility 833) is an 1,895 sq ft building that consists of
office, laboratory, and operational control areas. The multi-purpose building (Facility 832) is a
3,060 sq ft building that consists of electrical MCC's, diesel backup generator, locker/changing
rooms, and fire pump room.
There are numerous aboveground storage tanks in the Administration Area which are
summarized in the table below. All of these tanks are empty and physically disconnected from
the piping.
Facility# Description Size
836 Ballast Tank #2002 20,000 bbl
837 Ballast Tank #2003 20,000 bbl
838 DFM Issue Tank #2001 20,000 bbl
839 Contaminated Oil Tank #201 2,000 bbl
840 JP5 Heating Tank #501 5,000 bbl
841 JP5 Heating Tank #502 5,000 bbl
842 Wastewater Surge Tank #503 5,000 bbl
843 JP5 Settling Tank #251 2,500 bbl
844 JP5 Settling Tank #252 2,500 bbl
845 DFM Settling Tank #253 2,500 bbl
846 DFM Settling Tank #254 2,500 bbl
Fuel System Overview page 29 A-66
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
The pumphouse (Facility 834) consists of four pumps. Pumps 1-3 are primarily used to boost
fuel from Pier 12 to Pumphouse 113 at the San Pedro Fuel Depot. Pump 4 is a larger service
transfer pump rated for 4,095 GPM and up to 450ft of head.
Adjacent to the pumphouse is a large piping manifold that is used to issue/receive fuel between
the San Pedro Fuel Depot, the fuel pier, and the crosstown pipelines. Through different valve
configurations, any of the four pumps may be used in any service as required.
Facility 845
Tank #200
Facility 870
Tank #2001
Fuel System Overview
Office/Lab &
Multipurpose
Bldg
Facility 832
Long Beach Marine Terminal-Administration Area
Fire Water
Tank #301
page 30 A-67
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Marine Terminal Aboveground Storage Tank Area
Pumphouse & Valve Manifold, Facility 834
Fuel System Overview page 31 A-68
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Multipurpose Building, Facility 832
Office/Lab & Control Building, Facility 833
Fuel System Overview page 32 A-69
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
b. Long Beach Marine Terminal-Pier 12 Area
The Pier 12 Area is a 1,060 ft pier with two off-loading/loading stations, one on either side of
the pier, and three out of service F-76 hose loading positions . It also contains two dock watch
buildings and a boathouse. While most of the piping is located in a vault below the pier
decking, there are several equipment/valve pits on the pier that are accessible from above.
F-76 Hose
Fuel System Overview
East Loading Dock Watch
Bldg #1
Long Beach Marine Terminal-Pier 12 Area
page 33 A-70
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Overview of Pier 12, Facility 851
Boathouse, Facility 847
Fuel System Overview page 34 A-71
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Dock Watch Building #1, Facility 848
Dock Watch Building #2, Facility 849, and Loading Stations
Fuel System Overview page 35 A-72
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
c. SUMMARY OF CONDITION RATINGS
The fuel systems associated with DFSP San Pedro are all either permanently deactivated or in a state
of Temporary Closure. The systems that are categorized as being in a state of Temporary Closure
could be brought back on line in most cases by reconnecting assets to the piping system and
performing some basic and routine maintenance or repairs.
Of the fuel systems at DFSP San Pedro that are in a state of Temporary Closure, the facilities were
found to be generally in Marginal Mission Capable Condition with numerous repairs, equipment
replacement and maintenance work needed . A full list of the facilities and their assigned condition
rating, separated by site location and area, is included below.
Summary of Condition Ratings page 36 A-73
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Facility Condition Ratings
Facility No. Name Condition
San Pedro Fuel Depot-Administration Area
56 A Bulk Ready Fuel Additive Storage Temporary Closure-
Non-Mission Capable
59 Diesel Fuel Storage Out of Service-To Be Demolished
60 Diesel Fuel Storage Out of Service-To Be Demolished
68 Bulk Ready Fuel Additive Storage Temporary Closure-
Non-Mission Capable
70 Water Sto r age Tank Fire Protection Water Fully Mission Capable
100 Administration Building Degraded Mission Capable
101 Flagpole Fully Mission Capable
103 Contractor Admin Building Degraded Mission Capable
105 Drum Dock Paint Locker Out of Service, To Be Demolished
106 Bunker Out of Serv ice, To Be Demolished
107 Storage Building Out of Service , To Be Demolished
108 PW Storage Building Out of Service, To Be Demolished
113 POL Ops Center-Pump Station Temporary Closure-
Non -Mission Capable
115 Tank Truck Loading Facility Temporary Closure-
Non -Mission Capable
116 AV Fuels Sample Building Out of Serv ice , To Be Demolished
117 Drum Fill Plant Out of Service, To Be Demolished
120 Main Gate Sentry House Fully Mission Capable
250 Fire Pump Station Degraded Mission Capable
290 Sewer Ejector Building Degraded Mission Capable
292000, Aviation/NFSO Pipelines Degraded Mission Capable 292002
292073 Electrical System Degraded Mission Capable
292076, Water Lines Degraded Mission Capable 292077
292080 , Roadways Degraded Mission Capable 292083
292082, Parking Area Degraded Mission Capable 292084
292086 Drainage System Fully Mission Capable
292088 Fence Boundary Degraded Mission Capable
San Pedro Fuel Depot-Magazine Area
301 HE Magazine Bulk /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
302 HE Magazine Bulk /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
303 HE Magazine Bulk /V/ /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
Summary of Condition Ratings page 37 A-74
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
305 HE Magazine Bulk /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
306 HE Magazine Bulk /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
307 HE Magazine Bulk /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
308 HE Magazine Bulk /V/ /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
309 HE Magazine Bulk /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
310 HE Magazine Bulk /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
311 HE Magazine Bulk /V/ /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
312 HE Magazine Bulk /V/ /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
313 Operational Storage Marginal Mission Capable
314 HE Magazine Bulk /V/ /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
315 HE Magazine Bulk /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
316 HE Magazine Bulk /0/ Marginal Mission Capable
San Pedro Fuel Depot-AST Area
48 Aviation Fuels Storage JP8 Temporary Closure-
Non-Mission Capable
49 Aviation Fuels Storage JP8 Temporary Closure-
Non -Mission Capable
so Aviation Fuels Storage JP8 Temporary Closure-
Non -Mission Capable
270 Guard/Watch Tower Marginal Mission Capable
San Pedro Fuel Depot-UST Area
53 Industrial POL Waste Storage Facility Out of Service, To Be Demolished
54 Industrial POL Waste Storage Facility Out of Service, To Be Demolished
208 Substation Fully Mission Capable
Long Beach Marine Terminal -Administration Area
23 Substation 23 Fully Mission Capable
818 PS#2/Ship Wastewater Coli Ashore Out of Service
832 Multipurpose Building Temporary Closure-
Non-Mission Capable
833 Office/Lab & Control Building Temporary Closure-
Non-Mission Capable
834 Pumphouse Temporary Closure-
Non-Mission Capable
835 Fire Water Tank #301 Fully Mission Capable
836 Ballast Tank #2002 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
837 Ballast Tank #2003 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
838 DFM Issue Tank #2001 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
839 Contaminated Oil Tank #201 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
840 JPS Heating Tank #504 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
841 JPS Heating Tank #502 Temporary Closure-
Summary of Condition Ratings page 38 A-75
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Marginal Mission Capable
842 Wastewater Surge Tank #503 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
843 JP5 Settling Tank #251 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
844 JP5 Settling Tank #252 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
845 DFM Settling Tank #253 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
846 DFM Settling Tank #254 Temporary Closure-
Marginal Mission Capable
855 CP Separator Out of Service
856 Oily Water Pump Out of Service
857 Waste Oil Loading Station Out of Service
866 Dike Walls DFM Fully Mission Capable
870 Fuel System Icing Inhibitor Temporary Closure-
Non -Mission Capable
293006 Fuel Oil Pipeline Fully Mission Capable
293035 Fuel Farm Bit Road Fully Mission Capable
293036 Parking Area Fully Mission Capable
293037 Other Paved Areas Fully Mission Capable
293038 Mise Open Storage Fully Mission Capable
293039 Storm Drains Pier 12/POL Fully Mission Capable
long Beach Marine Terminal -Pier 12 Area
847 Boat House Degraded Mission Capable
848 Dock Watch Building #1 Degraded Mission Capable
849 Dock Watch Building #2 Degraded Mission Capable
851 Fuel Pier (Pier 12) Temporary Closure-
Non -Mission Capable
Summary of Condition Ratings page 39 A-76
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
D. EXISTING DEFICIENCIES SUMMARY
Existing deficiencies have been identified through multiple reports and previous planning studies . These
deficiencies have been reviewed and assessed to determine if they're still valid, accurate, or no longer
apply. In addition, where existing deficiencies have changed due to demolition, decommissioning, or
other site conditions, the valid components of the existing deficiency have been represented in one of
the new deficiencies. Refer to the deficiency table attached for a list of all existing deficiencies .
Existing Deficiencies Summary page 40 A-77
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
E. NEW DEFICIENCIES
The following list represents a summary of the deficiencies that were identified during the site
investigation. In addition, where existing deficiencies have changed due to demolition,
decommissioning, or other site conditions, the valid components of the existing deficiency have
been represented in one of the new deficiencies. The deficiencies are grouped by area and listed
by Facility Number.
New Deficiencies page 41 A-78
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
1. San Pedro Fuel Depot
a. Tank Clearances Not Met
Facility Number: 48, 49, SO
Priority: No Action
Summary of Deficiency: Tanks 48 & 49 are located too close to nearby public roads and
commercial buildings. All tanks are too close to each other.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires a distance of at least 100ft between the aboveground
storage tanks and the property line, nearby buildings, and each other or new facility
construction. Tanks 48 and 49 do not meet these clearance offsets . For tanks of this size and
type, NFPA 30 requires SOft from the tanks to the property line and a distance of 33ft between
the tanks. Both NFPA requirements appear to be in compliance with these general industry
standards.
Scope of Work: UFC criteria is not applicable for existing facilities and no repairs or relocations
are recommended at this time.
New Deficiencies page 42 A-79
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
b. Repair Containment Area
Facility Number: 48, 49, 50
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency:
1) Vegetation exists at mulitple control joints, cracks in containment dike, and at product
receipt/suction concrete-to-air interfaces.
2) Containment liner has several holes in the membrane.
3) Test ports on the Cathodic Protection System are missing caps in multiple locations,
compromising the containment.
4) Piping penetrations in the valve pits adjacent to the tanks appear to utilize sealant only.
5) Electrical handholes are located in the containment area and pose a risk for leaks through
the containment in the event of a leak.
Justification: UFC 3-460-03 requires that vegetation be removed, the liner to be in good
condition and free of tears, holes, or punctures, and for piping penetrations to utilize pipe
sleeves and link-type mechanical compression seals.
Scope of Work: Remove vegetation, replace test port caps, and repair the liner using flexible,
fuel-resistant, UV-resistant sealant as required. Provide pipe sleeves and link-type compression
seals for all piping penetrations in valve pits. Remove the electrical hand holes, fill with concrete
and sealant, and relocate the electrical equipment to a raised panel.
New Deficiencies page 43 A-80
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
c. Reactivate Tanks
Facility Number: 48, 49, 50
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency:
1) Reactivate Tanks
a. Due to temporary closure status the tanks have been disconnected from
supply/receipt piping with the controls and instrumentation disconnected.
2) Deficiencies
a. Supply and receipt piping do not contain ball joints between the piping.
b. Tanks do not contain DB&B valves at supply & receipt lines.
c. The tank PRT pumps are extremely corroded and in need of replacement .
d . There are no EFSO Stations at the egress points from the tank containment areas .
Justification:
1) Tanks are currently out of service and inoperable.
2) UFC 3-460-01 requires ball joints between piping and aboveground storage tanks for
flexibility.
3) UFC 3-460-01 requires DB&B skin valves at tanks .
4) UFC 3-460-03 requires equipment in disrepair to be replaced.
5) UFC 3-460-01 requires emergency shut-off devices at the egress points of tank containment
areas .
Scope of Work:
1) Reconnect piping, instrumentation, and controls at tanks.
2) Prov ide ball joints in supply and receipt piping.
3) Provide 14" supply and receipt DB&B skin valves. Provide low suction/water draw-off piping
with two DB&B valves.
4) Replace each PRT pump with an equivalent size pump and explosion-proof motor.
5) Provide an emergency shut-off device near each egress point. Provide an EFSO system which
closes the tank outlet MOVs upon activation of an EFSO push button. Emergency shut-off
devices shall be large, red mushroomed push buttons, wired in series, and connected to the
EFSO system. Provide signage consisting of engraved white plastic with a red core and
lettering 2 inches high reading "EMERGENCY FUELS SHUT-OFF". Provide bollards where
EFSO push button is subject to damage from vehicles.
New Deficiencies page 44 A-81
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
New Deficiencies page 45 A-82
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
d. Repair Tank Grounding
Facility Number: 48, 49, 50
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The entries to the tank containment area lack means for personnel to
ground themselves before entering a hazardous area . The ground wires to the PRT tanks are
broken.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires bonding of all non-current carrying metallic objects .
Personnel grounding plates or connection of stairs/handrails to a ground rod to allow personnel
to ensure they can dissipate any static buildup on their persons before entering the hazardous
area are required. UFC also requires all fuel systems to be connected to a grounded system to
prevent electrostatic buildup in the system.
Scope of Work: Provide personnel grounding plates connected to a ground rod at each entrance
to the tank conta i nment area . Connect grounding plates at entrances with metallic structures
such as stairs, handrails, etc. Provide ground wire between existing grounding lugs on PRT tanks
and existing exposed grounding wire. Make connection with existing wire with a non-reversible
mechanical connection .
New Deficiencies page 46 A-83
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
e. Provide Tank Lighting
Facility Number: 48, 49, 50
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The existing tank containment area has no area lighting. The tank stair
lights are controlled by photocell only . These lights are only needed when someone is climbing
the tank.
Justification: AW 78-24-2 requires area lighting to be provided for tank containment areas.
Providing a local switch located at the bottom of the tank stairs to activate the lights when
needed is a best practice item.
Scope of Work: Provide pole -mounted, LED area lighting around the perimeter of the tank
containment area to provide nighttime illumination. Light fixtures shall be full cutoff type and
controlled by photocell. Alternatively, provide task lighting only at the tanks near control devices
and allow for local controllability . Provide an explosion-proof switch connected in series with
the tank stair lighting and located at the bottom of the stairs mounted to the railing of each
tank.
New Deficiencies page 47 A-84
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
f. Reactivate FSIIInjection System
Facility Number: 56A, 68
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency:
1) Replace Tanks . Both tanks lack a visible nameplate and therefore it cannot be determined
what standard they were built to . Facility 56A is an 8,000 gallon tank. Facility 68 is a 10,000
converted riveted railcar tank.
2) Reactivate FSIIInjection System. The tanks have been disconnected from supply/receipt
piping with the controls and instrumentation disconnected . The Hammond's injectors have
not been in use for several years. There are holes in the concrete containment walls and
multiple cracks in the floor and walls of the containment area .
Justification:
1) UFC 3-460-01 and DoD standards require horizontal and vertical aboveground storage tanks
to be built to UL -142 and API 650 , respectively . A converted railcar could be a deterrent to a
potential lessee.
2) The cracks and holes in the concrete containment could result in a potential release of
product to the environment.
3) The tanks and injectors have been physically disconnected and out of service for several
years .
Scope of Work:
1) Replace tanks and install in accordance with UFC 3-460-01.
2) Repair concrete containment and seal through -hole penetrations .
3) Reconnect and reinstall piping, instrumentation and controls, and perform any
manufacturer recommended maintenance and repair on the injectors. If necessary, replace
injectors .
New Deficiencies page 48 A-85
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Existing FSII Tanks
Existing FSII Injectors
New Deficiencies page 49 A-86
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
g. Provide Bollards Around HVAC
Facility Number: 100
Priority: Long Term
DFSP SAN PEDRO
Summary of Deficiency: There are two HVAC units located in the parking lot adjacent to parking
spaces .
Justification: Cars utilizing the parking lot could d r ive into the HVAC units .
Scope of Work: Provide five bollards to surround the HVAC units and protect from vehicular
collision .
New Deficiencies page 50 A-87
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
h. Repair Administration Building
Facility Number: 100
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency:
1) According to the occupants, the building experiences problems with circuits tripping
randomly. The wiring is original to the building which was built sometime in the 1960s.
2) The sink and shower in the women's restroom are not accessible. The door into the
restroom does not meet the maneuvering clearance on the pull side.
3) The sink, toilet, and urinals in the men's restroom are not accessible . The door into the
restroom does not meet the maneuvering clearance on the pull side.
4) The shower in the changing room does not meet accessibility requirements.
5) The exterior stucco wall finish is damaged and cracked in several locations.
6) The existing wood floor system has higher than average deflection which may be the result
of deteriorating framing members . Interior finishes such as the carpeting and ceiling tiles are
damaged.
Justification:
1) The electrical system of the building is at the end of its service life.
2) Restrooms, showers, and fixtures shall meet the accessibility requirements of UFC 1-200-01
and ABA 2015 .
3) The damaged wall provides insufficient moisture and weather barrier from the
environment, which will lead to early deterioration of the structure and reduce the service
life of the building.
4) Flooring, carpeting, and ceiling tiles should be repaired and replaced as necessary.
Scope of Work:
1) Replace electrical panels, breakers, and wiring in the building.
2) Provide accessible sinks and showers meeting the requirements of ABA 2015. Relocate the
new sink to provide adequate maneuvering clearance at the door. Provide an accessible
shower meeting the requirements of ABA 2015.
3) Patch and repair the stucco wall surface.
4) Replace and repair the interiors finishes as required. Monitor the floor framing in the
crawlspace on a yearly basis for the condition of the framing members .
New Deficiencies page 51 A-88
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
New Deficiencies page 52 A-89
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
i. Repair Contractor Administration Building
Facility Number: 103
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency:
1) The exterior metal wall panels are in poor condition with damage at multiple areas with
rusting and small holes. Roof panels have significant rusting that is visible from the interior.
2) The finishes on the structural steel frames, purlins, and girts have deteriorated and some
rust is visible.
3) The exterior concrete pavement and interior concrete slab have significant cracking while
the interior shop office slab is scratched and stained.
4) The windows and trim are in fair to poor condition with damaged trim . According to
occupants the windows are no longer operable.
5) The conditioned office space appears to have inadequate air barrier and is uninsulated from
the shop space .
6) The plumbing fixtures in the men's restroom are not accessible, the floor clearances at the
fixtures aren't sufficient, and the urinals are out of order. The plumbing fixtures and door
threshold in the women's restroom are not accessible.
7) The interior finishes such as vinyl composition tils, wall and ceiling panel boards are in poor
condition.
8) There is only one exit door in the building, not including the garage service door.
Justification:
1) The damaged wall and roof panels provide insufficient moisture and weather barrier from
the environment. This will lead to early deterioration and reduce the service life of the
building.
2) Insufficient coating on steel members will lead to early deterioration from the environment
and reduce the service life of the building.
3) Exterior and interior concrete, windows, and trim are in poor condition and require repair.
4) UFC requires sufficient air barrier and insulation between conditioned and unconditioned
spaces to reduce energy consumption.
5) There is no requirement to provide an ADA compliant restroom in existing buildings but is a
requirement for major renovations and new construction per UFC 1-200-01 and ABA 2015.
The addition of a women's restroom appears to be completed after the adoption of ABA and
should meet the requirement.
6) Interior finishes should be repaired and replaced as necessary.
7) It should be verified if a single exit door is adequate for this building.
New Deficiencies page 53 A-90
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Scope of Work:
1) Existing metal wall and roof panels should be replaced to provide an effective air and
moisture barrier.
2) The structural frame, purlins, and girts should be prepared and recoated.
3) Patch and repair exterior concrete pavement and interior concrete slab. Patch and repair
interior shop office slab and apply sealer.
4) Replace windows and trim with aluminum double hung windows to match.
5) Provide an air barrier and insulation at the office space walls and ceiling.
6) Reconfigure and replace plumbing fixtures to meet accessibility requirements such as
clearances, accessible fixtures, grab bars, and accessories. Modify the women's restroom
threshold to meet accessibility requirements.
7) Repair and replace interior finishes .
8) If it's verified that a single exit is inadequate, provide an additional exit to the building .
New Deficiencies page 54 A-91
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
j. Repair Drum Paint Locker
Facility Number: 105
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The finish on the wood roof framing, fascia, and soffit is in poor
condition .
Justification: Insufficient coating on wood components will lead to early deterioration from
the environment and reduces the service life of the building.
Scope of Work: Recoat wooden components .
New Deficiencies page 55 A-92
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
k. Demolish Bunker
Facility Number: 106
Priority: Short Term
Summary of Deficiency: The concrete walls and roof are spalling and the steel reinforcement
is exposed . The steel plate entry door is stuck and inoperable during the time of observation .
The facility is no longer needed
Justification: The concrete needs to be repaired and the door to be repaired or replaced.
Removal of abandoned facilities will increase desirability of the site .
Scope of Work: Demolish facility.
New Deficiencies page 56 A-93
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
I. Demolish Abandoned Storage Buildings
Facility Number: 107, 108
Priority: Short Term
Summary of Deficiency: Storage buildings #107 and 108 are unsafe for use and abandoned.
Justification: Facilities are no longer needed, contain lead and asbestos, and are unsafe for
use. Cost to repair the facilities is prohibitive. Removal of abandoned facilities will increase
desirability of the site.
Scope of Work: Demolish the abandoned storage buildings.
New Deficiencies page 57 A-94
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Abandoned Storage Building, Facility 107
Abandoned Storage Building, Facility 108
New Deficiencies page 58 A-95
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
m. Reconfigure Pumphouse 113 Manifold
Facility Number: 113
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency: This is one of the projects planned by the Facility Manager that was
canceled due difficulty with contracting avenues; it is recommended this project be completed
prior to the out-lease program. All USTs in the San Pedro Fuel Depot have been permanently
decommissioned. There are 5 pipelines and approximately 64 automated valves in the pump
manifold that could be eliminated.
Justification: Eliminating the valves and piping that are no longer needed will increase
accessibility for maintenance and operations, help reduce operator errors by simplifying
operations, and preventing accidental releases.
Scope of Work: Remove valves and piping associated with decommissioned USTs that are no
longer needed .
New Deficiencies page 59 A-96
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
r·-·-··------~~-
New Deficiencies
i
!
l L ____ _
Proposed Valve Manifold Modifications
Existing Valve Manifold
DFSP SAN PEDRO
page 60 A-97
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
n. Reactivate Pumphouse 113
Facility Number: 113
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency:
1) Reactivate Pumphouse
a. Due to the temporary closure status the pumps have been disconnected from
supply/discharge piping with the controls and instrumentation partially removed .
2) Deficiencies
a. The pumphouse is not protected by a sprinkler system and the window separating
the pumphouse and breakroom does not have a 1.5 hr fire rating and is not
protected with a fire shutter.
b. There is an exit door from the pumphouse which doesn't have an EFSO station .
c. The fire alarm panel, associated with the AFFF System, is past its service life and no
longer needed .
d . The pipe column at the entrance canopy of the building is damaged .
e. The interior concrete walls have moderate sized cracks and spa I ling in multiple
locations
f. The building does not have an accessible entrance from the parking area .
g. The plumbing fixtures in the restroom are not accessible. Floor clearances at fixtures
insufficient.
h. The interior finishes in the building are in poor condition, such as broken ceramic
wall tiles in the restroom and missing ceiling tiles in the operation center.
i. The existing control system is a proprietary control system and only partially in
place . A new control system needs to be installed. The system can be operated
manually.
Justification:
1) The pumps are currently out of service and inoperable.
2) UFC 3-460-01 requires pumphouses where over 50% of the fuel pumping capacity is located
shall be protected by automatic fire suppression . A fire can traverse between the pump
room and remaining building areas.
3) UFC 3-460-01 requires EFSO stations at all exit doors from pumphouses .
4) The fire alarm panel is no longer needed .
5) The damaged pipe column significantly reduces the structural capacity ofthe column . UFC 3-
460-03 Section 11-2.2 requires inspecting and maintaining canopies.
6) Damaged concrete walls and interior finishes will lead to early deterioration from the
environment and reduces the service life of the building.
New Deficiencies page 61 A-98
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
7) While there is no requirement to provide an ADA compliant accessible entrance and
restrooms in existing buildings, it is a requirement for major renovations and new
construction per UFC 1-200-01 and ABA 2015.
8) The controls system was partially removed due to the temporary closure status of the
facility.
Scope of Work:
1) Reconnect piping, instrumentation, and controls at the pumps. Perform any manufacturer
recommended maintenance and repair on pumps, strainers, and valves.
2) Perform motor testing in accordance with IEEE Standard 43-1974 and pump testing in
accordance with Hydraulic Institute Standards for Pump Testing.
3) Install automatic fire suppression in the pumphouse and replace the window separating the
pumphouse and breakroom .
4) Provide an explosion-proof EFSO push button station mounted on the wall at the exit door.
Wire in series with the existing EFSO circuit. Push button shall be red and large, mushroom
head type.
5) Demolish the fire alarm panel associated with the AFFF System .
6) Replace the pipe column and add steel bollards to prevent future damage.
7) Patch and repair the spalling concrete.
8) Repair and replace interior finishes as necessary.
9) Add concrete ramp and handrails and reconfigure and replace plumbing fixtures to meet
ABA 2015 accessibility requirements .
10) Provide a new control system to replace the existing system . Wire to existing
controls/instrumentation as needed and coordinate with future projects to provide an
adequate system for the facility .
New Deficiencies page 62 A-99
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Disconnected Pump and Instrumentation
Non Fire Rated Window
New Deficiencies page 63 A-100
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
o. Provide Canopy Over Pumphouse 113 Manifold
Facility Number: 113
Priority: Long Term
DFSP SAN PEDRO
Summary of Deficiency: There is a substantial amount of valving and instrumentation located
outside Pumphouse 113 exposed to the elements .
Justification: UFC 3-460-01, Section 3-8, requires a canopy to protect fixed facility assets and
operators from weather.
Scope of Work: Provide a canopy over the Pumphouse 113 valve manifold.
New Deficiencies page 64 A-101
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
p. Reactivate Filter/Separators
Facility Number: 115
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency:
1) The flow capacity of the filter/separator PSVs are illegible and there is no PRT to collect the
discharge from the PSVs and AAVs.
2) The filter/separators associated with the Tank Truck Loading Facility have been out of
service for several years .
3) The TRVs located downstream of the filter/separators discharge to a trench drain and do not
contain a testing port on the inlet piping.
Justification:
1) UFC 3-460-01 requires PSV and AAV discharges to be collected by a PRT.
2) Maintenance and repairs should be performed to ensure the filter/separators are
operational.
3) UFC 3-460-01 requires TRVs to have testing ports on the inlet piping and for the discharge to
be routed into the upstream piping or to be captured by a PRT .
Scope of Work:
1) Remove existing PSVs, AAVs, and discharge piping. Provide balanced type PSVs and stainless
steel AAVs. All PSV, AAV, and drains shall be manifolded together and routed to a 500 gal
double wall stainless steel PRT.
2) Perform any manufacturer recommended maintenance and replace the elements.
3) Rework the TRV piping to meet UFC requirements.
New Deficiencies page 65 A-102
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
New Deficiencies page 66 A-103
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
q. Repair Tank Truck Loading Facility
Facility Number: 115
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency:
1) The tank truck loading facility is lacking several components required by UFC, including a
basket strainer with differential pressure upstream of each meter, metering proving
connections, and EFSO stations. The existing ball joint swivels and fueling/vapor hoses show
signs of failure.
2) There are no EFSO stations within 100 to 200ft in the direction of egress from the tank truck
loading facility.
3) There are no explosion-proof rated junction boxes within the hazardous area.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires the components described above. NEC 501 requires
explosion-proof rated junction boxes in hazardous areas.
Scope of Work:
1) Repair the piping to include the components described above and replace the ball joint
swivels and fueling/vapor hoses . Reconnect electronic controls and instrumentation to the
tank truck loading facility.
2) Provide an emergency shut-off device 100-200 ft in the direction of each egress point.
Emergency shut-off devices shall be large, red mushroomed push buttons, wired in series,
and connected to the EFSO system. Provide signage consisting of engraved white plastic
with a red core and lettering 2 inches high reading "EMERGENCY FUELS SHUT-OFF". Provide
bollards where EFSO push button is subject to damage from vehicles.
3) Replace the two non-explosion-proof junction boxes inside the hazardous area.
New Deficiencies page 67 A-104
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
New Deficiencies page 68 A-105
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
r. Provide Personnel Grounding
Facility Number: 115
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency: The stairs/platform/handrails for personnel access have no means for
personnel to effectively ground themselves before entering the hazardous area .
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires bonding of all non-current carrying metallic objects.
Personnel grounding plates or connection of stairs/handrails to a ground rod allows personnel
ensure they can dissipate static buildup on their persons before entering the hazardous area .
Scope of Work: Provide grounding conductors connectors to a ground rod at each stair and
bond to platforms and handrails.
New Deficiencies page 69 A-106
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
s. Replace Emergency Shower/Eyewash Station
Facility Number: 113, 115
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The existing emergency shower/eyewash stations at the Pumphouse
Facility 113 and Tank Truck Loading Facility 115 do not utilize tepid water, are not freeze
protected, and do not have any audible/visual or electronic alarm notifications.
Justification: Although emergency shower/eyewash stations are not required by OSHA for this
service, OSHA does require safety showers to meet ANSI Z358.1.
Scope of Work: Replace or upgrade the emergency shower/eyewash stations to meet ANSI
requirements.
New Deficiencies page 70 A-107
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
t. Demolish AV Fuel Sample Building
Facility Number: 116
Priority: Short Term
DFSP SAN PEDRO
Summary of Deficiency: The AV Fuel Sample building is currently out of service and abandoned.
Justification: Facilities are no longer needed. Removal of abandoned facilities will increase
desirability of the site.
Scope of Work: Demolish the abandoned building .
New Deficiencies page 71 A-108
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
u. Repair Main Gate Sentry House
Facility Number: 120
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The Sentry House does not have an accessible entrance from the
parking area . The finishes on the structural steel columns and base plates have deteriorated and
rust is visible . The finishes on the hollow metal doors and frames are in poor condition.
Justification: ABA 2015 requires an accessible entrance for new construction however this is an
existing structure and it is extremely unlikely that a disabled person would meet the physical
requirements to be a guard therefore no repair recommendation is required at this time.
Insufficient coating on steel components will lead to early deterioration from the environment
and reduces the service life of the building .
Scope of Work: Prepare steel components and apply new exterior grade coating.
New Deficiencies page 72 A-109
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
v. Repair Fire Pump Station
Facility Number: 250
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The diesel exhaust piping is exposed, the sprinklers inside the building
are obstructed by the overhead lighting, and the overhead lighting is not functional. The finish
on the downspout has deteriorated and is rusting. The door closer is broken and detached from
the door. The metal wall panels show minor rusting at the base .
Justificat ion: The exhaust piping should be insulated for personnel protection. NFPA 13 requires
obstructions to be minimized around sprinklers. The non-functional lighting should be replaced.
The impaired components will lead to early deterioration of the structure. A broken door closer
may lead to the door being accidentally left open and the fire pump equipment exposed to
tampering.
Scope of Work: Reinsulate the diesel exhaust piping and rework the overhead lighting so the
sprinklers are not obstructed. Replace existing fluorescent flighting fixtures inside the fire pump
room with LED type fixtures. Repair and replace the downspout and metal wall panels as
required . Replace the door closer .
New Deficiencies page 73 A-110
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
w. Perform Fire Water Upgrade Study
Facility Number: 250
Priority: Short Term
Summary of Deficiency: The fire water distribution near the ASTs does not provide the required
water supply if the Western Avenue water supply is unavailable . The most recent fire protection
study, "Repair Terminal Fire Protection System, DFSP San Pedro, CA" (dated 2009) identified the
available water supply as 400 gpm at 8 psi.
Justification: Per UFC 3-600-01 the minimum water requirements are 875 gpm at 20 psi. If the
Western Avenue water supply is not available during an emergency, there may not be adequate
water supply for firefighting.
Scope of Work: Perform study and prepare recommendations to address the deficiency .
New Deficiencies page 74 A-111
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
x. Repair Sewer Ejector Building
Facility Number: 290
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The exterior wood siding, roof fascia, wood door and frame are in very
poor condition . The door lock creates an unsafe condition.
Justification: The deteriorated components provide insufficient moisture and weather barrier
from the environment. This will lead to early deteriorated of the structure and reduce the
service life of the building. The door lock does not meet exit requirements per UFC 1-200-01.
Scope of Work: Replace the wood siding, roof fascia, wood frame and door. Provide an integral
lock on the door knob that allows personnel to exit without a key.
New Deficiencies page 75 A-112
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
y. Reactivate Piping
Facility Number: 292000, 292002
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency: The facility piping has been inactive for several years and lacks proper
labeling . Throughout the facility U-bolt and pipe shoe supports are used with direct p i pe contact
and without PTFE plates. There are numerous locations where piping transitions from
aboveground to underground and lacks proper isolation.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires supports to contain PTFE plates between the pipe and
support to protect the pipe coating, proper labeling of pipe contents, and double block and
bleed isolation valves when piping transitions from aboveground to underground to conduct
periodic hydrostatic tests . All deactivated piping is believed to have a 5 psig nitrogen charge .
Provided this blanket is still active, no further testing or inspection should be required to
reactivate the piping.
Scope of Work: Repair pipe supports, provide proper product labeling, and provide DB&B valves
where piping transitions from aboveground to underground throughout all remaining active
piping in the Fuel Depot .
New Deficiencies page 76 A-113
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
z. Perform Pipeline Thermal Relief Study
Facility Number: 292000, 292002
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The present thermal relief system across the fuel depot is inadequate,
resulting in the need to leave key valves opened for thermal relief. Numerous TRVs are mounted
in the horizontal position and lack isolation valves and maintenance tees.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires adequate thermal relief to account for thermal expansion .
TRVs should be installed in the vertical position for proper operation and contain isolation valves
and maintenance tees.
Scope of Work: Perform a study to evaluate the thermal relief system protecting all remaining
active piping at the Fuel Depot and provide additional TRVs as required to properly address
thermal expansion. Install TRVs in the vertical position and provide isolation valves and
maintenance tees as required . Provide PRTs to capture relief discharges as required .
New Deficiencies page 77 A-114
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
aa. Upgrade Site Lighting
Facility Number: 292073
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The existing site lighting (approximately 49 fixtures) consists of old low-
pressure sodium fixtures .
Justification: The site lighting has reached the end of its useful life.
Scope of Work: Replace the site lighting fixtures with new LED fixtures and mount on existing
poles . Perform lighting calculations to determine lumen value and distribution types.
New Deficiencies page 78 A-115
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
bb. Add Bollards Around Fire Hydrants
Facility Number: 292076, 292077
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: There are approximately 15 fire hydrants without bollards are located
adjacent to facility roadways .
Justification: Hydrants located near roadways are susceptible to vehicular damage.
Scope of Work: Provide four bollards to surround each of the 15 fire hydrants .
New Deficiencies page 79 A-116
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
cc. Repair Pavement
Facility Number: 292080, 292083, 292084
Priority: Long Term
DFSP SAN PEDRO
Summary of Deficiency: The parking area and roadway pavement were in poor condition
throughout the facility with vegetation and cracking.
Justification: Parking area and roadway pavement should be repaired before the minor
deficiencies lead to more severe issues .
Scope of Work: Remove all vegetation and resurface pavement in areas deemed desirable to
the out-lease program.
New Deficiencies page 80 A-117
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
dd. Repair Fence Boundary
Facility Number: 292088
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency:
1) Heavy vegetation was observed growing into the fence throughout the facility.
2) A broken barbed wire support arm and top rail were observed .
3) The fence near Facilities 48, 49, and 50 is adjacent to a public roadway and does not have
reinforcing cable.
Justification: Security fencing should be clear of obstructions and vegetation and maintained in
good condition . Perimeter fencing near storage tanks adjacent to public roadways should utilize
reinforcing cables to prohibit vehicles from damaging the facility.
Scope of Work: Remove vegetation, repair fencing, and install reinforcing cables near Facilities
48 , 49 , and 50 for additional security.
New Deficiencies page 81 A-118
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
ee. Repair Pipe Coating
Facility Number: 292000, 292002
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The coating system that protects the carbon steel piping throughout
the facility has several areas of localized failure and light surface corrosion . Coating failures may
be found in the Pumphouse 113 Manifold and Aboveground Storage Tank Area while minor
failure may be found in Tank Truck Loading Facility piping.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 Section 9-10 requires all exterior surfaces of carbon steel piping to
be coated to prevent corrosion.
Scope of Work: Provide spot repairs of the coating system, including light tool -brush cleaning
and preparation of the existing pipe and application of a new repair coat.
New Deficiencies page 82 A-119
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
2. Long Beach Marine Terminal
a. Replace Back-Up Generator
Facility Number: 832
Priority: Long Term
DFSP SAN PEDRO
Summary of Deficiency: The current generator does not have sufficient capacity to supply
power to the pumps, emergency panels, and 20% additional capacity . The manufacturer is no
longer in business, making spare parts difficult to find.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires the back-up generator meet the above requirements.
Scope of Work: Replace the generator and ATS. Coordinate with future projects and power
requirements of the site to determine sizing. New generator will likely need to be located
outdoors in a rated enclosure due to space constraints inside the room. Replace the automatic
control panel.
New Deficiencies page 83 A-120
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
b. Replace Fire Alarm Panel
Facility Number: 832
Priority: Immediate
DFSP SAN PEDRO
Summary of Deficiency: The existing fire alarm control panel does not work and has no means
to communicate with any external fire department.
Justification: The fire alarm control panel is inoperable and not connected to external fire
departments.
Scope of Work: Replace the fire alarm control panel and provide means of communication with
NWS Seal Beach fire department.
New Deficiencies page 84 A-121
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
c. Repair Multipurpose Building
Facility Number: 832
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency:
1) The existing lighting is fluorescent with many ballast and lamps not working across the
building.
2) The existing dry-type distribution transformer has reached the end of its useful life and
needs to be replaced.
1) There are two unused fire alarm panels located outside the fire pump control room that are
currently abandoned in place.
2) When changing room facilities are provided, a separate changing room shall be provided for
each gender.
3) The sink, toilet, and showers in the men's room are not accessible. Provide two GFCI outlets
in the locker room .
4) The changing room does not have an accessible entrance from the parking area.
5) The exterior metal wall and roof panels are in poor condition with damage in multiple areas.
6) The electrical distribution equipment has reached the end of its useful life. This includes the
motor control center, power distribution panels, and dry-type distribution transformers.
Justification:
1) The existing lighting is largely inoperable and requires repair.
2) The dry-type distribution transformer has reached the end of its useful life.
3) Abandoned panels should be removed .
4) Changing room facilities shall meet UFC 1-200-01 and ABA 2015.
5) While there is no requirement to provide an ADA compliant accessible entrance in existing
buildings, it is a requirement for major renovations and new construction per UFC 1-200-01
and ABA 2015.
6) The damaged wall and roof panels provide insufficient moisture and weather barrier from
the environment.
7) The electrical distribution equipment has reached the end of its useful life.
New Deficiencies page 85 A-122
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Scope of Work:
1) Replace building lighting with similar style LED fixtures.
3) Replace existing 30kVA dry-type transformer with an equal sized new transformer.
4) Demolish unused fire alarm panels located outside the fire pump control room.
5) Provide a women's changing room with accessible shower, toilet, and sink while replacing
the men's changing room facilities to meet ABA 2015. Provide two GFCI outlets.
6) Add a concrete ramp and handrails that meet ABA 2015.
7) Repair and replace the metal wall and roof panels as necessary.
8) Replace motor control center, power distribution panelboards, and dry-type distribution
transformer.
New Deficiencies page 86 A-123
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
d. Repair Buildings
Facility Number: 847, 848, 849
Priority: Short Term
Summary of Deficiency: The exterior metal wall and roof panels of the Dock Watch and Boat
House buildings are in poor condition with damage in multiple areas, rusting, and small holes .
The interior finishes are in poor condition .
Justification: The damaged wall and roof panels provide insufficient moisture and weather
barrier from the environment. This will lead to early deterioration of the structure and reduce
the service life of the buildings.
Scope of Work: The existing metal wall and roof panels of the Pier 12 buildings should be
repaired and/or replaced. Repair and replace the interior finishes as necessary.
New Deficiencies page 87 A-124
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
e. Repair Office/Lab & Control Building
Facility Number: 833
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency:
1) The electrical distribution equipment, including the motor control center, power distribution
panels, and dry-type distribution transformers, has reached the end of its useful life.
2) The existing control system is a proprietary control system and only partially in place. A new
control system needs to be installed.
3) The existing lighting is fluorescent with many ballast and lamps not working across the
building.
4) The HVAC disconnect switch located outside is badly corroded.
5) The fuels lab space does not meet several UFC requirements.
6) A separate toilet room shall be provided for each gender.
7) The exterior metal wall and roof panels are in poor condition with damage in multiple areas.
8) There are currently panels labeled as "emergency" but there is no backup power system in
place.
Justification:
1) The electrical distribution equipment has reached the end of its useful life.
2) The controls system was partially removed due to the temporary closure status of the
facility.
3) The existing lighting is largely inoperable and requires repair.
4) The disconnect switch has reached the end of its useful life.
5) UFC 3-460-01 requires above counter grounding bars, door frames to be grounded,
dedicated HVAC for the fuels lab, a floor drain and floor containment, emergency eye wash,
a lighted exit sign above the door, and a recessed floor.
6) When toilet rooms are provided, a separate toilet room shall be provided for each gender
for major renovations or new construction under ABA 2015.
7) The damaged wall and roof panels provide insufficient moisture and weather barrier from
the environment.
8) The system is unusable in the event of a power outage.
New Deficiencies page 88 A-125
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Scope of Work:
1) Replace the electrical distribution equipment system and wire to existing
controls/instrumentation as needed .
DFSP SAN PEDRO
2) Provide a new control system to replace the existing system. Wire to existing
controls/instrumentation as needed and coordinate with future projects to provide an
adequate system for the facility .
3) Replace building lighting with similar style LED fixtures.
4) Replace the HVAC disconnect switch.
5) Provide above counter grounding bars, bond the door frame to the grounding system, a
dedicated HVAC, a floor drain and floor containment, emergency eye wash , a lighted exit
sign above the door and recessed floor.
6) Provide a second accessible toilet room that meets ABA 2015 .
7) Repair and replace the metal wall and roof panels as necessary .
8) Provide a backup generator and interlocked transfer switch in the MCC. Coordinate with
future projects and power requirements to determine sizing . The new generator will need to
be located outdoors in a rated enclosure.
New Deficiencies page 89 A-126
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
f. Reactivate Pumphouse
Facility Number: 834
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency:
1) Reactivate Pumphouse
a. Due to the temporary closure status the pumps have been disconnected from
supply/discharge piping with the controls and instrumentation partially removed.
The pumphouse does not contain any curbing to stop fuel leaks .
2) Deficiencies
a. The pumphouse does not contain any curbing to stop fuel leaks.
b. The exterior lighting is incandescent with many lamps not working .
c. The exterior metal wall and roof panels are in poor condition with damage in
multiple areas.
d . There is no emergency shower/eyewash station located inside the pumphouse (not
required by OSHA but may be a requirement of user).
e. Existing grounding connections need repair at the electrical rack and ladders.
Justification:
1) The pumps are currently out of service and inoperable.
2) Containment is required to contain potential leaks .
3) The lighting is at the end of its useful life.
4) The damaged wall and roof panels provide insufficient moisture and weather barrier from
the environment.
5) UFC 3-460-01 requires emergency shower/eyewash stations to be installed in a pumphouse,
however it does not appear that OSHA requires an eyewash for this particular fuel product.
If provided, emergency shower/eyewash stations must meet ANSI Z358 .1 and have
audible/visual alarms as well as electronic feedback to the control room .
6) UFC 3-460-01 requires bonding of all non-current carrying metallic objects. Personnel
grounding connection of ladders/handrails to a ground rod allows personnel to ensure they
can dissipate any static buildup on their persons before entering or while within the
hazardous area.
New Deficiencies page 90 A-127
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
Scope of Work:
1) Reconnect piping, instrumentation, and controls at the pumps. Perform any manufacturer
recommended maintenance and repair on pumps, strainers, and valves.
2) Install curbing around perimeter of pumps to contain leaks in case of spills.
3) Perform motor testing in accordance with IEEE Standard 43-1974 and pump testing in
accordance with Hydraulic Institute Standards for Pump Testing.
4) Replace lighting with similar style explosionproof LED fixtures.
5) Repair and replace the metal wall and roof panels as necessary.
6) Install an emergency shower/eyewash station in accordance with UFC and ANSI criteria as
required.
7) Repair grounding connections at the electrical rack and ladders. Provide additional ground
rods and connections at stairs which have no existing grounding . Bond stairs and handrails
to form one continuously bonded system.
New Deficiencies page 91 A-128
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
g. Repair Piping
Facility Number: 834 (Admin Area), 851 (Pier 12)
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The facility piping has been inactive for several years and lacks proper
labeling . Throughout the facility U-bolt and pipe shoe supports are used with direct pipe contact
and without PTFE plates. There are numerous locations where piping transitions from
aboveground to underground and lacks proper isolation .
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires supports to contain PTFE plates between the pipe and
support to protect the pipe coating, proper labeling of pipe contents, and double block and
bleed isolation valves when piping transitions from aboveground to underground to conduct
periodic hydrostatic tests.
Scope of Work: Repair pipe supports, provide proper product labeling, and provide DB&B valves
where piping transitions from aboveground to underground.
New Deficiencies page 92 A-129
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
h. Repair Piping
Facility Number: 836
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The piping north of Facility 836 (locally identified as Tank #2002)
contains U-bolt supports that are used with direct pipe contact and without PTFE plates . The
piping transitions from aboveground to underground and lacks proper isolation.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires supports to contain PTFE plates between the pipe and
support to protect the pipe coating and double block and bleed isolation valves when piping
transitions from aboveground to underground to conduct periodic hydrostatic tests.
Scope of Work: Replace pipe supports and provide DB&B valves where piping transitions from
aboveground to underground .
New Deficiencies page 93 A-130
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
i. Tank Clearances Not Met
Facility Number: 836, 837, 838, 842, 843, 844, 845, 846, 870
Priority: No Action
Summary of Deficiency:
1) Facilities 836, 837, 838, 841, 842, 844, and 846 (locally known as Tanks #2002, 2003, 2001,
502, 503, 252, 254, and 200) are located too closely to the property line.
2) Facilities 836, 837, and 842 (locally known as Tanks #2002, 2003, and 503) are located too
closely together within the same containment.
3) Facilities 843 and 845 (locally known as Tanks #251 and 253) are located too closely the
Pumphouse, Facility 834.
4) Facilities 837, 844, and 846 are located too closely to the adjacent railway spur.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires the following minimum clearances: a distance of 100ft
between the aboveground storage tanks and the property line, roads, and/or nearby buildings; a
distance of 50ft from railroad spurs; and a minimum tank spacing not less than one diameter of
the larger tank. The existing tanks are not in compliance with these military criteria. For tanks of
this size and type, NFPA 30 requires 80-100 ft from the tanks to the property line, 15-20 ft
between the tanks within the same containment, and 25ft from the tanks to important
buildings. The NFPA distance required to the property line is not met while the other NFPA
clearances are met.
Scope of Work: Determine if the tanks are grandfathered in or if any waivers or exclusions exist.
No repairs or relocation are recommended at this time.
New Deficiencies page 94 A-131
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
j. Replace Tank ATG Systems and Grounding
Facility Number: 838, 840, 841, 843, 844, 845, 846, 870
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The existing ATG systems for these facilities are out of date and in
disrepair. The entryways to the tank containment areas do not have grounding for personnel.
Justification: The ATG systems are at the end of their useful life. UFC 3-460-01 requires bonding
of all non -current carrying metallic objects. Personnel grounding connection of
ladders/handrails to a ground rod allows personnel to ensure they can dissipate any static
buildup on their person before entering or while within the hazardous area.
Scope of Work: Provide new ATG systems for all fuel tanks . Provide grounding/bonding at the
containment entry ladders and stairs.
New Deficiencies page 95 A-132
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
k. Replace Panelboards
Facility Number: 847, 849
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The existing panelboards are NEMA 1 rated and badly corroded .
Justification: The panelboards have reached the end of their useful life.
Scope of Work: Replace the existing panel boards with NEMA 4X rated stainless steel enclosures
for corrosion resistance.
New Deficiencies page 96 A-133
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
I. Replace Emergency Shower/Eyewash Stations
Facility Number: 851
Priority: Long Term
DFSP SAN PEDRO
Summary of Deficiency: The existing emergency shower/eyewash stations do not utilize tepid
water, are not freeze protected, and do not have any audible/visual or electronic alarm
notifications.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires emergency shower/eyewash stations to meet ANSI Z358.1
and have audible/visual alarms as well as electronic feedback to the control room.
Scope of Work: Replace the emergency shower/eyewash stations at each loading station.
New Deficiencies page 97 A-134
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
m. Provide Canopy Over Equipment Pit on Pier 12
Facility Number: 851
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: There is a substantial amount of valving, instrumentation, and
equipment located on Pier 12 that is exposed to the elements.
Justification: UFC 3-460-01, Section 3-8, requires a canopy to protect fixed facility assets and
operators from weather.
Scope of Work: Provide a canopy over the Pier 12 equipment pit located south of the Boat
House (Facility 847).
New Deficiencies page 98 A-135
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
n. Repair and Reconfigure Pier 12
Facility Number: 851
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency:
1) The existing off-loading/loading arms are used for multi-fuel operation.
2) The existing surge system is not functioning and no longer needed.
3) The entryways to the equipment valve pit and loading station pits do not have grounding for
personnel.
4) The motors for the various small pumps, mooring units, and boom reels are all badly
corroded.
Justification:
1) Segregation of the loading arm operation will prevent degradation of fuels.
2) The surge system is no longer needed.
3) UFC 3-460-01 requires bonding of all non-current carrying metallic objects. Personnel
grounding connection of ladders/handrails to a ground rod allows personnel to ensure they
can dissipate any static buildup on their person before entering or while within the
hazardous area.
4) The motors have reached the end of their useful life.
Scope of Work:
1) Reconfigure each loading arm to be single product use.
2) Remove the obsolete surge system .
3) Provide grounding/bonding at the equipment valve pit and loading station pit entry ladders.
4) Replace all existing motors with equivalently sized motors rated for severe duty and
explosion-proof where applicable .
New Deficiencies page 99 A-136
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
New Deficiencies page 100 A-137
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
o. Provide Traffic Bollards on Pier 12
Facility Number: 851
Priority: Long Term
DFSP SAN PEDRO
Summary of Deficiency: There are no traffic bollards around the Pier 12 equipment pits to
protect the fuel piping.
Justification: Per UFC 3-460-01, Section 5-14, to protect fueling piping and equipment on piers.
Scope of Work: Provide traffic bollards around equipment pits .
New Deficiencies page 101 A-138
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
p. Provide Grounding
Facility Number: 870
Priority: Long Term
Summary of Deficiency: The FSII Tank does not have grounding on the tank, at the entryways of
the containment area, or at the tank ladder and platform .
Justification: UFC 3-460-01 requires bonding of all non-current carrying metallic objects.
Personnel grounding connection of ladders/handrails to a ground rod allows personnel to
ensure they can dissipate any static buildup on their person before entering or while within the
hazardous area.
Scope of Work: Provide grounding/bonding at the tank in two places at the containment entry
ladder and at the tank access ladder and platform .
New Deficiencies page 102 A-139
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
q. Reactivate Tanks
Facility Number: 836, 837, 838
Priority: Immediate
Summary of Deficiency:
1) Reactivate Tanks
a. Due to temporary closure status the tanks have been disconnected from
supply/receipt piping with the controls and instrumentation disconnected.
2) Deficiencies
a. Supply and receipt piping do not contain ball joints between the piping.
b. Tanks do not contain DB&B valves at supply & receipt lines or water draw-off
systems.
c. Vegetation exists at multiple control joints, cracks in containment dike, and at
product receipt/suction concrete-to-air interfaces.
d. There are no EFSO Stations at the egress points from the tank containment areas .
Justification:
1) Tanks are currently out of service and inoperable.
2) UFC 3-460-01 requires ball joints between piping and aboveground storage tanks for
flexibility.
3) UFC 3-460-01 requires DB&B skin valves and water draw-off systems at tanks.
4) UFC 3-460-03 requires that vegetation be removed from the containment area .
5) UFC 3-460-01 requires emergency shut-off devices at the egress points of tank containment
areas.
Scope of Work:
1) Reconnect piping, instrumentation, and controls at tanks.
2) Provide ball joints in supply and receipt piping.
3) Provide supply and receipt DB&B skin valves. Provide low suction/water draw-off piping
with two DB&B valves and water draw-off system at tanks.
4) Remove vegetation and fill concrete with fuel-resistant, UV-resistant sealant as required.
5) Provide an emergency shut-off device near each egress point. Provide an EFSO system which
closes the tank outlet MOVs upon activation of an EFSO push button. Emergency shut-off
devices shall be large, red mushroomed push buttons, wired in series, and connected to the
EFSO system . Provide signage consisting of engraved white plastic with a red core and
lettering 2 inches high reading 11 EMERGENCY FUELS SHUT-OFF". Provide bollards where
EFSO push button is subject to damage from vehicles.
New Deficiencies page 103 A-140
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT DFSP SAN PEDRO
New Deficiencies page 104 A-141
F. Attachment (1) Deficiency List By Urgency of Repair
DFSP San Pedro Deficiency List-Rationale
Deficiencies Have Been Developed from the Following sources:
Existing Deficiencies have been identified from the previous Project Planning Study, the Integrity Management Plan,
Tank Inspection Reports, and a Pier Study . New deficiencies were develop based on the findings of the site visit.
Priority definitions:
Immediate: Deficiency should be addressed immediately, upon regulatory approval is granted for the renewal of
fueling operations .
Urgent: Deficiency should be addressed within 6 months
Short Term: Deficiency should be addressed within 2 years
Long Term: Deficiency should be addressed within 2-5 years
No Action Required: The deficiency is informational in nature, and does not require a repair.
Wetted I Non-Wetted Facilities
Wetted Facilities are those with direct contact to the piping or equipment, such as a pumphouse or a storage tank.
Non-Wetted Facilities are those such as an administration building or security fence, which are used in a supporting
role of the fueling system and are not in direct contact with fuel piping or equipement.
1 of 21
A-142
Attachment (1) --DEFICIENCY LIST BY URGENCY OF REPAIR
Exist i ng o r
~overn ment Pla ns to Complet
New Deficie ncy 10 Fa cilit y Deficiency Desc ription Faci lity Compo nent Li mited Scope of Re pair Pri ority
Wo rk
Yes-Government plans
to perform manufacturer
832 (Pumphouse, recommended
2014 EE l PP5 Replace Fuel Pier Generator Immediate (status changed Existing Back-Up Generator maintenance on
#1 Pier 12 Area) generator and automatic
on 07 Oct 19)
transfer switch to ensure
operational status.
2014 EE l PP5 851 (Fueling Pier, Existing
#2 Pier 12 Area) Rep lace and Reconfigure Pier Piping Pier 12 Piping No Not Valid
2014 EE l PP5
839 (Contaminated
Repair Secondary Containment Col lection Existing Oil Tank #201, Pier Tank #201 Area No Not Valid
#3 12 Area) System, Tank 201, and Truck Offload Station
2014 EE l PP5 292001 (P ipe lines, Remove Dresser Couplings on theN, S, C and A-B Exist ing Series 20 Tanks No Not Valid #4 Bulk Fuels Area) Header associated with Series 20 Tanks
2014 EE l PP5 292001 (P ipe lines,
Repair 23 Va lve Vaults-lacking covers Existing Valve Vaults No Not Valid
#5 Bulk Fuels Area)
2014 EE l PP5 292001 (Pipelines,
Repair Piping-Kinder Morgan Pipe line KM Pipeline Not Valid Existing No
#6 Bulk Fuels Area)
2014 EE l PP5 292001 (Pipe lines, Provide Iso lation Valves-Main Terminal Existing Series 20 & 40 Tanks No Not Valid
#7 Bulk Fu els Area)
2014 EE l PP5 292001 (P ipe lines, Integr ity Investigation to Expose and Repair Pumphouse 113, Series 20 & 40 Tanks, Exist ing No Not Valid
#8 Bulk Fuels Area) Pipelines KM Pipeline
2014 EE l PP5 250 (Fire
Existing Pumphouse, Bulk Repair Fire Pump Room Fire Pump No Not Valid
#9
Fuels Area)
2 OF 21
A-143
Existing or Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component
~overnment Pl ans to Complet
Priority New Limited Scope of Repair
Work
2014 EEl PPS
113 {Transfer
Existing Pumphouse, Bulk Repair Pumphouse (Fire and Safety) Pumphouse 113 No Not Valid #10
Fuels Area)
2014 EEl PPS
115 (Tank Truck
Existing l oading Rack, Bulk Repair Truck l oading Rack Tank Truck Loading Facility No Not Valid
#11
Fuels Area)
20 14 EEl PPS 115 (Tank Truck
Existing loading Rack, Bulk Repair Filter/Separator Pressure Relief Filter/Separators No Not Valid
#12
Fuels Area)
2014 EEl PPS 56A, 68(Add itive
Existing Injection System, Repair FSII Tank Co ntainment Dike Tanks 56A & 68 Containment No Not Valid
#13
Bulk Fu els Area)
2014 EEl PPS
56A, 68(Add itive
Pr ovide FSII Tank Venting and lntermodal
Existing Injection System, Tanks 56A & 68 No Not Valid
#14 Bulk Fuels Area) Loading Capabi lity
2014 EEl PPS 51(Siop Loading
Existing Rack, Bu lk Fuels Repair Slop Truck Loading Rack Tank 51 No Not Valid
#15
Area)
2014 EEl PPS 292001 {Pipelines,
Repair Ther mal Relief System Existing Fuel Pipelines No Not Valid
#16 Bulk Fuels Area)
113, 834(Fuel
Transfer 2014 EEl PPS
Pumphouses. 113 Existing
#17
Bulk Fuels Area; 834
Pump and Motor Testing Pumphouse 113 & 834 Pumps No Not Valid
Pier 12 Area)
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Existing
#18 Bulk Fuels Area)
Underwater In spection of Channel Crossing Fuel Pipelines No Not Valid
2014 EEl PPS
108(01d St orage
Feasibility Study to Convert Building from Existing Build ing, Bulk Fuels Facility 108 No Not Valid #19
Area)
Storage to Office Space
3 OF 21
A-144
Existing or ~ove rnme nt Pl ans to Complet
New Def ici ency ID Facility Defici ency Description Facility Component l imited Sco pe of Repair Priority
Wo rk
2014 EE l PPS
Upgrade Fire Protection System Study Existing
#20
Fire Water System No Not Valid
2014 EE l PP S 843 (JPS Settl ing
Demolish Tank 251 Existing Tank #2S l No Short Term
#21 Tank, Pier 12 Area)
2014 EE l PPS 844(JPS Settl ing
Demolish Tank 252 Existing Tank #2S2 No Short Term
#22 Tank, Pier 12 Area)
2014 EEl PPS 84S (D FM Se t t li ng Demolish Tank 253 Existing Tank #2S3 No Short Term
#23 Tank, Pier 12 Area)
2014 EE l PPS 846(JPS Settl ing
Demoli sh Tank 254 Existing Tank #2S4 No Short Term
#24 Tank, Pier 12 Area)
2014 EE l PPS
840, 841(JP-5
Existing Heating Tanks, Pier Demolish Tanks 501 and 502 Tank #SO l & S02 No Short Term
#25 12 Area)
2014 EE l PPS
842 (Wast e Water
Existing Surge Tank, Pie r 12 Demolish Tank 503 Tank #S03 No Short Term
#26
A rea)
4 OF 21
A-145
Existing or
~overnment Plans to Complet
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component Limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
Yes+ Government t o
2014 EEl PP5
858 (Reclaimed fu el demolish facility and
Existing pump statio n , Pier Demolish Reclamation & Issue Pump Station Facility 858 restore si t e to original Short Term
#27
12 Area) cond ition
2014 EEl PP5 834 (Transfer
Existing Pumphouse, Pier 12 Demolish Pump CB-04 and Associat ed Piping Pump CB-04 No Short Term
#28
A rea)
59, 60, 117 (Drum
2014 EEl PP5 Fill Plant, Waste Oil Demolish Tank 59 and 60, Truck Loading Rack, Yes-Government to
Existing Tanks 59 & 60, Facility 117 Immediate #29 Tanks, Bulk Fuels and Drum Loading Area at the Main Terminal demolish
Area)
2014 EEl PP5 53 (Waste Oi l Yes-Government to
Ex isting Tanks, Bu lk Fue ls Demolish Tank 53 Tank 53 Immediate
#30
Area)
demolish
2014 EEl PP5
54 (Waste Oil
Yes -Government to Existing Tanks, Bulk Fuels Demolish Tank 54 Tank 54 Immediate
#31
A rea)
demolish
2014 EEl PP 5
832 (Multi-purpose
Provide 2 GFCI outlets in locker room and siding
Exist ing Bui lding, Pier 12 Building 832 No Not Valid
#32
Area)
repai rs.
2014 EEl PP5 834 (Transfer
Existing Pumphouse, Pier 12 Remove cone strainers and provide siding repairs. Pumphouse 834 No Not Valid
#33
A rea)
2014 EEl PP5 292001 (Pipelines, Remove a Yl-inch bronze gate valve on a pressure
Existing indicator in the south control pit and rep lace with a DFM Area No Not Va lid
#34 Bulk Fu e ls Area) carbon steel ba ll valve .
2014 EEl PP5 292001 (Pipelines, Re-pipe the BCR on select DB&B va lves to rel ieve Existing 20 Series Tank Farm No Not Valid
#35 Bulk Fuels Area) away f rom the tank .
2014 EEl PP5 292001 (Pipelines, Remove l-inch bronze ba ll valve on the HPV in VP
Existing 20 Series Tank Farm No Not Valid
#36 Bulk Fuels Area) 104 and replace with a carbon steel ball valve.
5 OF 21
A-146
Existing or ~overnment Plans to Complet
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component Limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Provide plug for the 2" plug valve in VP 104 that is Existing 20 Series Tank Farm No Not Valid
#37 Bulk Fuels A rea) currently open to atmosphere
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, The BCR on the DB&B valves contain a valve that is
Existing not plugged and open to atmosphere . Valve size is Pumphouse 113 Manifold No Not Valid
#38 Bulk Fu els Area) Yi-inch or %-inch depending on location.
Adjust the catwalk that spans the width of the
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, manifold and rests on the 11 headers . Modify the Pumphouse 113 Manifold Not Valid Existing No
#39 Bulk Fuels Area) catwalk so it is no longer in contact with the lines or
provide low friction interfaces.
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines,
Provide low friction interfaces for the 14-inch lines
Existing that are not in contact "fl oating" with the pipe Valve Vault 1 (40 Series USTs) No Not Valid
#40 Bulk Fuels A rea) supports.
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Adjust the grate currently in contact with the 6-inch
Existing Valve Vault 1 (40 Series USTs) No Not Valid
#41 Bulk Fue ls Area) water draw line.
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Adjust the grate currently in contact with the 6-inch
Existing Valve Vault 2 {40 Series USTs) No Not Valid
#42 Bu lk Fuels Area) water draw line.
2014 EEl PPS SO (AST, Bu lk Fue ls Remove two bronze 1-1/2" gate valves associated
Existing with Tank SO and replace with carbon steel ball Tank SO No Immediate
#43 Area) valves .
2014 EEl PPS 52 {Waste Tank, Remove 3-inch bronze check valve in the vertical Existing Tank 52 No Not Valid
#44 Bulk Fu els Area) position and provide a pipe spool.
2014 EEl PPS 52 (Waste Tank, Remove 3-inch bronze check valves and provide
Tank 52 No Not Valid Existing
#45 Bulk Fu e ls Area) carbon steel check valves .
2014 EEl PPS 52 (Waste Tank, Remove a l -inch bronze ball valve on a HPV and Existing Tank 52 No Not Valid
#46 Bulk Fuels A rea) provide a carbon steel ball valve.
2014 EEl PPS
834 (Transfer
Clean and recoat 2-inch tees associated with the
Existing Pumphouse, Pier 12 drainage system. Pumphouse 113 Manifold No Not Valid
#47 Area)
2014 EEl PPS
834 (T ransf er
Existing Pumphouse, Pier 12 Clean and recoat the HCNA tie-in 2-inch ball valve . Pumphouse 113 Manifold No Not Valid
#48
Area)
2014 EEl PPS
834 (Transfer Clean and recoat 1 SF of 18-inch piping where the
Existing Pumphouse, Pier 12 Pumphouse 113 Manifold No Not Valid
#49 JP-5 li ne ties into the main header.
A rea)
6 OF 21
A-147
Existing or ~overnment Plans to Complet
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component Limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Clean and recoat 2-inch ba ll valve for HPV in the Existing DFM Area No Not Valid
#50 Bulk Fuels A rea) north control pit.
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Remove the panel bolted to the KM and G-line near
Pumphouse 113 Manifold Not Valid Existing No
#51 Bulk Fuels Area) Pump 8. Clean and recoat .
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Clean and recoat 10 LF of 10-inch piping on the KM Existing Pumphouse 113 Manifold No Not Valid
#52 Bulk Fuels Area) line .
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Existing Clean and recoat 10 LF of 8-inch piping on the G line . Pumphouse 113 Manifold No Not Valid
#53 Bulk Fu els Area)
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Remove pipe wrap on select flanges in the rise that
Existing have failed and are exhibiting coating failure and Pumphouse 113 Manifold No Not Val id
#54 Bulk Fuels A rea) corrosion . Clean flanges. Do not rewrap.
Remove tape wrap on the 14-inch JP-5 line at the
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, concrete/air interface on the meter proving pad . Exist ing Pumphouse 113 Area No Not Va lid
#55 Bu lk Fuels Area) Clean and re -coat with surface tolerant flood coat
protection.
Remove failing pipe wrap on the 18-inch JP-5 line.
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Remove approximately four feet of pipe wrap, clean
Existing pipe, and recoat with water tolerant epoxy. It is Harbor Regan Valve Stations No Short Term
#56 Bu lk Fuels Area) estimated that the wrap extends two feet into the
soil.
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Clean and recoat approximately 5 If of 10-inch piping. Golden Eagle Va lve Vau lt (KM Pipeline) Not Valid Existing No
#57 Bulk Fuels Area)
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Exxon Mobile Vau lt (KM Pipeline) Long-Term/Not Valid Existing Clean and recoat 10-inch nuts and bolts . No
#58 Bulk Fuels A rea)
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Long-Term/Not Valid Exist ing Clean and recoat 10 If of 10-inch piping. Arco Valve Vault (KM Pipeline) No
#59 Bulk Fuels A rea)
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines, Clean and recoat approximately 2 SF of 10-inch
Existing KM Terminal No Long-Term/Not Valid
#60 Bulk Fuels Area) piping.
2014 EEl PPS 292001 (Pipelines,
Re-seal 19 inch concrete/air interfaces. Long-Term/Not Valid Existing Pier 12 Pig Launchers No
#61 Bulk Fu e ls Area)
7 OF 21
A-148
Existing or ~overnment Plan s to Compl et
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
2014 EEl PPS 48, 49, SO (ASTs, Clean and recoat 15 LF of sma ll bore piping
Existing associated with Tanks 48, 49, and 50 where water Aboveground Storage Tanks No Not Valid
#62 Bulk Fuels A rea) has degraded the coating system in the pits .
2014 EEl PPS 48 (AST, Bulk Fue ls Clean and recoat 8-inch flange in the pit adjacent to Aboveground Storage Tanks No Not Valid Existing
#63 Area) Tank 48.
2014 EEl PPS SO (AST, Bu lk Fue ls Remove pipe wrap associated with sma ll bore TSV Aboveground Storage Tanks Not Valid Existing No
#64 Area) piping at Tank 50. Clean and recoat 2 feet of piping.
Existing 2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Sandblast/Recoat External Tank Roof No Long Term
R1 A rea) Floating Roof
Existing 2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Replace double w iper Sea ls Tank Seals No Long Term
R2 Area) to entire perimeter of tank
Existing
2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Sandblast/recoat entire tank
Tank Shell No Long Term
R3 Area) external shell/various
Existing 2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Coat tank bottom Tank Bottom No Long Term
R4 Area)
Yes -repa ir to be
Exist ing 2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Reconnect ATG system and Tank ATG completed by Not Valid
RS A rea) repair/replace equipment Government
2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Provide TRV's and crossover
Tank TRVs Not Valid Existing No R6 Area) piping for product rece ipt/suction
Yes -Government to
2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bu lk Fuels In st all Waste Water Recovery
repair replacement
Existing Tank Wastewater Recovery product recovery tanks Not Valid
R7 A rea) system and motors-in-kind
2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels
Containment/remove
Existing vegetation and sea l control Tank Containment Yes Immediate
R8 A rea) ·oints
8 OF 21
A-149
Existing or ~overnment Plans to Complet
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component Limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bu lk Fuels
Containment/remove
Existing vegetation and sea l dike Tank Containment Yes Immediate
R9 Area)
recei t and suction
2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls Containment/remove
Existing vegetation and seal ch ime to Tank Containment Yes Immediate
RlO Area)
ring wal l interface
2018 Ta n k 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Existing
Rll A rea)
Provide DB&B valves for
product receipt & suction
Tank Valves No Not Valid
2018 Ta n k 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Provide DB&B valve for low Tank Valves Short Term Existing No
R12 Area) suction/water draw-off
Existing 2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bu lk Fuels
Update product sig n age Piping Labels Yes Immediate R13 A rea)
Existing
2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Provide protection for
Tank Electrical Yes Immediate
R14 Area) grounding cables
Existing 2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Remove vegetation/Repair Tank Containment Yes Immediate
RlS Area) HOPE liner
2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels
Install overfill protection
Existing (HLCV/Shut-off pilot Tank Piping No Not Valid
R16 A rea)
chamber)
Existing 2018 Ta n k 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Remove EFR/Insta ll Fixed Tank Roof No Long Term
R17 A rea) roof and IFR.
Existing 2018 Tan k 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Replace flex joints drain piping or insta ll a Tank Piping No Immediate
R18 Area) Coflexip hose.
Existing
2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels In sta ll isolation pads at two
Tank Valve Vault No Long-Term
R19 A rea) (2) pipe supports
Existing 2018 Tank 48 Report 48 (AST, Bulk Fuels Replace Pipe Spools I Tank Valve Vault No Not Valid
R20 Area) Demolish va ult -VP8
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bulk Fuels Sandblast/Recoat Externa l Floating Roof Tank Roof No Long-Term
Rl Area)
9 OF 21
A-150
Existing or ~ove rnme nt Pl ans to Compl et
New Def ici ency ID Facility Defici ency Description Facility Comp onent Limited Sco pe of Repai r Priority
Work
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AS T, Bu lk Fuels Rep lace double w iper sea ls to entire perimeter Tank Seals No long-Term
R2 Area) of tank
Existing 2018 Ta nk 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls Sandblast/recoat entire tank external Tank Shell No long-Term
R3 Area) shell /various
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls
R4 Area) Coat ta n k bottom Tank Bottom No long Term
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AS T, Bu lk Fue ls Reconnect ATG system and Tank ATG Yes Not Valid
RS Area) re pai r /replace equ ipment
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls Provide TRV's and crossover piping for product Tank TRVs No Not Valid
R6 Area) receipt/suction
Yes-Government to
2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls
repair rep lacement
Existing Insta ll Waste Wa t er Recove ry system Tank Wastewater Recovery prod uct recovery tanks Not Valid
R7 Area) and motors-in-kind
Existing 20 18 Tank 49 Report 49 (AS T, Bu lk Fue ls Containment /remove vegeta t ion and sea l Tank Containment Yes Immediate R8 Area) co ntrol joints
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls Containment /remove veget at ion and seal dike Tank Containment Yes Immediate
R9 Area) rece ipt and suction
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AS T, Bu lk Fue ls
R10 Area)
Containment/remove vegetation and seal ch ime
to r ing wall interface Tank Containment Yes Immediate
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AS T, Bu lk Fue ls Provide DB&B valves for product receipt & Tank Valves No Not Valid
Rll Area) suction
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls
R12 Area)
Provide DB&B valve for water draw-off Tank Valves No Not Valid
Existing 2018 Ta nk 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls
R13 Area) Update product signage Piping Labe ls Yes Immediate
10 OF 21
A-151
Existing or Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component
~overnment Pl ans to Complet
Priority New Limited Scope of Repair
Work
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bulk Fuels Provide protection for grounding cab les Tank Electrical Yes Immediate
R14 Area)
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bulk Fue ls
Repair EFR ladder track ground in g cable Tank Electrical Yes Immediate R1S Area)
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bulk Fuels In st all overfill protection (HLCV/Shut-off pilot Tank Piping No Not Valid
R16 A rea) chamber)
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls
R17 Area)
Repair HOPE liner Tank Containment Yes Immediate
Existing
2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls
Remove EFR/Install fixed roof and I FR. Tank Roof No Not Valid
R18 Area)
Existing
2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls Rep lace flex joints on drain piping or install a
Tank Piping No Immediate
R19 Area) Coflexip hose.
Existing
2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bulk Fue ls
In sta ll isolation pads at two (2) pipe su p ports Tank Valve Vault No Long-Term
R20 Area)
Existing
2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bulk Fue ls
R21 Area)
Replace receipt and suction valves in distribution
vau lt with DB&B va lves
Tank Valve Vault No Not Valid
Existing 2018 Tank 49 Report 49 (AST, Bu lk Fue ls
R22 Area)
Replace pipe spools/demoli sh vault + VP8 Tank Valve Vault No Not Val id
Existing 2018 Tank SO Report SO (AST, Bu lk Fuels Sandblast/Recoat EFR Tank Roof No Long Term
R1 A rea)
Existing
2018 Tank SO Report SO (AST, Bulk Fuels Replace double wiper sea ls to entire perimeter Tank Seals No Long-Term
R2 Area) of tank
Existing 2018 Tank SO Report SO (AST, Bulk Fuels Sandblast/recoat entire tank external Tank Shell No Long Term
R3 Area) shell/various
Existing
2018 Tank SO Report SO (AST, Bu lk Fue ls
R4 Area) Coat t ank floor Tank Bottom No Long Term
11 OF 21
A-152
Existing or ~ove rnme nt Pl ans to Compl et
New Def ici ency ID Facility Defici ency Description Facility Compon ent l imited Sco pe of Repair Priority
Wo rk
Existing 2018 Tank SO Report 50 (A5 T, Bu lk Fue ls Reconnect ATG system and Tank ATG Yes Not Valid
R5 Area) repai r /rep lace equipment
Existing 2018 Tank SO Report 50 (A5 T, Bu lk Fue ls Seal we ld TRV crossover pipi ng at suction and Tank TRVs No Not Valid
R6 Area) receipt lines
Yes-Government to
2018 Tank 50 Report 50 (A5T, Bu lk Fue ls
repair rep lacement
Existing In sta ll Waste Water Recove ry system Tank Wastewater Recovery prod uct recovery tanks Not Valid
R7 Area) and motors-in-ki nd
Existing 2018 Tank SO Report 50 (A5T, Bu lk Fue ls Reseal control joints Tank Containment No Immediat e R8 Area)
Existing 2018 Tank 50 Report 50 (A5T, Bu lk Fue ls Contai nment/remove vegetation and sea l dike Tank Containment Yes Immediate
R9 Area) suction
Existing 2018 Tank 50 Report 50 (A5T, Bu lk Fue ls Provide DB&B valves for product receipt & Tank Valves No Not Valid
R10 Area) suction
Existing 2018 Tank 50 Report 50 (A5 T, Bu lk Fue ls Provide DB&B valve for water draw-off Tank Valves No Not Valid
Rll Area)
Existing 2018 Ta nk SO Report 50 (A5T, Bu lk Fue ls Update product signage Piping Labe ls Yes Immediate
R12 Area)
2018 Ta nk SO Report 50 (A5T, Bu lk Fue ls Provide protection for grounding cab les Yes -Government to Existing Tank Electrical Immediate
R13 Area) repai r
Existing 2018 Ta nk SO Report 50 (A5T, Bu lk Fue ls In st all overfill prot ection (HLCV/Shut-off pi lot Tank Piping No Not Valid
R14 Area) chamber )
Existing 2018 Tank 50 Report 50 (A5T, Bu lk Fue ls
R15 Area) Repa ir HOPE line r Tank Containment Yes Immediate
Existing 2018 Tank 50 Report 50 (A5T, Bu lk Fue ls
Remove EFR/Install fixed roof and I FR. Tank Roof No Not Valid
R16 Area)
12 OF 21
A-153
Existing or ~overnment Plans to Complet
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component Limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
Existing
2018 Tank SO Report SO (AST, Bulk Fuels Replace flex joints on dra in piping or install a Tank Piping No Immediate R17 Area) Coflexip hose.
Existing 2018 Tank SO Report SO (AST, Bu lk Fuels Install isolation pads at t wo (2) pipe supports Tank Valve Vault No Long-Term
R18 A rea)
Existing 2018 Tank SO Report SO (AST, Bulk Fuels Replace receipt and suction valves in va ult w ith Tank Valve Vault No Not Valid
R19 A rea) DB&B
Existing
2018 Tank SO Report SO (AST, Bu lk Fuels
Replace pipe spools/demoli sh vault-VP8 Tank Valve Vault No Not Valid
R20 Area)
W FI &A of Pier 12 8S1 (Fuel Pier, Pier
Repair 8 Pile Foundations and CP Anode Hanger Existing Pier 12 No Long-Term
H1 010.01 12 Area)
WF I&A of Pier 12 8S1 (Fuel Pier, Pier
Repair Pile Cap Delamination Existing Pier 12 No Long-Term
H1010.02 12 Area)
WF I&A of Pier 12 8S1 (Fuel Pier, Pier Existing
H1020.03 12 Area) Realign Precast Concr ete Covers Pier 12 No Long-Term
WF I&A of Pier 12 8S1 (Fuel Pier, Pier Perform Deck Delamination Investigation Existing Pier 12 No long-Term
H1030.03 12 Area)
WF I&A of Pier 12 8S1 (Fuel Pier, Pier Repair Pier Curb Spa lling and Damaged Pier 12 Existing No long-Term
H1030.04 12 Area) Containment Cu rb
W FI &A of Pier 12 8S1 (Fuel Pier, Pier
Repa ir Spa llin g on Mooring Bo ll ard Foundations Existing Pier 12 No Long-Term
H1030.0S 12 Area)
WF I&A of Pier 12 851 (Fuel Pier, Pier Existing
H1030.08 12 Area)
Realign Displaced Trench Covers Pier 12 No Long-Term
W FI &A of Pier 12 85 1 (Fuel Pier, Pier
Yes-Government to
Exist ing Clear Clogged Deck Drains Pier 12 complete Immediate H1030.11 12 Area)
WF I&A of Pier 12 8S1 (Fuel Pier, Pier
Existing
H10S0.01 12 Area) Repair East Tanker Station Handrail Pier 12 No Long-Term
W FI &A of Pier 12 851 (Fuel Pier, Pier Repair Piping Supports and Clean/Recoat Existing Pier 12 No Long-Term
HS010.04 12 Area) Contaminated Oi l Pip in g
WF I&A of Pier 12 851 (Fuel Pier, Pier Existing
HS010.06 12 Area)
Repair Compressed Air Piping Pier 12 No Long-Term
W FI &A of Pier 12 85 1 (Fuel Pier, Pier Repair Fuel Piping, l oad in g Arms, and DFM Issue Existing Pier 12 No Long-Term
HS010 .07 12 Area) Stations
WF I&A of Pier 12 851 (Fuel Pier, Pier Repair Broke n or Damaged light Pole Anchor
Pier 12 Existing No Long-Term
HS020.03 12 Area) Bo lt Covers
13 OF 21
A-154
Existing or ~overnment Plans to Complet
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component Limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
WF I&A of Pier 12 851 (Fuel Pier, Pier
Existing
H5030.01 12 Area)
Clean and Recoat Foam Monitor Station Pier 12 No Long-Term
New 1.a 48, 49 (A5Ts, Bulk Tanks Clearances Not Met Tank Clearances No No Action Required
Fuels Area)
New 1.b 48, 49, 50 (A5Ts, Repair Conta inment Area Tank Containment Yes Immediate
Bulk Fuels A rea)
New 1.c 48, 49, 50 (ASTs, Reactivate Tanks Aboveground Storage Tanks No Immediate
Bulk Fuels A rea)
New 1.d 48, 49, 50 (ASTs,
Bulk Fuels A rea)
Repair Tank Grounding Tank Electrical Yes Immediate
New l.e
48, 49, 50 (ASTs,
Provide Tank Li ghting Tank Lighting No Immediate
Bulk Fuels A rea)
115 (Additive
New 1.1 Injection System, Reactivate FSI IInjection System FSII System No Immediate
Bulk Fu els Area)
100 (Admin
New l.g Bu ilding, Bulk Fuels Provide Bollards around HVAC Safety No Long-Term
Area)
100 (Admin
New 1.h Bui lding, Bulk Fu els Repair Administration Bui ldi ng Building Restoration No Long-Term
A rea)
103 (Contractor
New l .i Bui lding, Bulk Fu els Repair Contractor Administration Buildi ng Building Restoration No Long-Term
Area)
New l .j 105 (Mise Building,
Bulk Fuels Area)
Repair Drum Paint Locker Building Restoration No Long-Term
14 OF 21
A-155
Existing or ~overnment Plans to Complet
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
New 1.k
106(Bunker, Bulk
Demolish Bunker Building Restoration No Long-Term
Fuels Area)
107, 108(01d Yes-to be demolished by
New 1.1 Storage Buildings, Demolish Abandoned Storage Buildings Building 107, 108 Government Immediate
Bulk Fuels Area)
Yes-Government to
conduct the following
repairs: reconfiguration of
113 (Pumphouse, pipe manifold to include:
New 1.m
Bulk Fuels Area)
Reconfigu re Pumphouse 113 Manifold Pumphouse 113 Manifold demolition of control Immediate
valves, manual valves,
thermal relief valves and
pipe headers, installation of
blind flanges as required.
15 OF 21
A-156
Existing or Deficiency ID
New
New 1.n
New 1.o
New 1.p
Facility
113 (Pumphouse,
Bulk Fuels Area)
Deficiency Description
Reactivate Pumphouse 113
Facility Component
Pumphouse 113
113 (Pumphouse,
Bulk Fuels Area) Provide Canopy Over Pumphouse 113 Manifold Pumphouse 113 Manifold
115 (Truck Loading, Reactivate Filter/Separators
Bu lk Fuels Area)
Filter/Separators
~overnment Pl ans to Compl et
limite d Scope of Repair
Work
Yes -Government to
reconnect piping and install
isolation va lves for each
pump, reconnect all
instrumentation and
controls to each pump,
perform manufacturer
recommended
maintenance for all pump
house components and
motor testing, install
automatic fire suppression
in pumphouse, replace
window separating
breakroom from
pumphouse, install
emergency fuel shut-off
device near exit door,
patchi and repair spa lied
concrete throughout
facility, update sign age in
FY20 or FY21.
No
Yes-Government repair
work limited to
performance of
manufacturer
recommended
maintenance on
fi lter/separators, basket
strainers and control valves
in FY20 or FY21.
Priority
Immediate
long-Term
Immediate
16 OF 21
A-157
Existing or
New Deficiency ID
New 1.q
New 1.r
New 1.s
New 1.t
New 1.u
New 1.v
New 1.w
New 1.x
Facility Deficiency Description
115 (Truck Loading,
Bulk Fuels Area) Repa ir Tank Truck Loading Facility
115 (Truck Loading,
Provide Personnel Grounding
Bulk Fuels Area)
115(Truck Loading,
Replace Emergency Shower/Eyewash Station
Bulk Fuels Area)
116 (Mise Building, Repair AV Fuel Sample Building
Bulk Fuels Area)
120 (Mise Building,
Repair Main Gate Sentry House
Bulk Fuels Area)
250 (Fire
Pumphouse, Bulk Repa ir Fire Pump Station
Fuels Area)
250 (Fire
Pumphouse, Bulk Perform Fire Water Upgrade Study
Fuels Area)
290 (Mise Building,
Repair Sewer Ejector Building
Bulk Fuels Area)
~overnment Plans to Complet
Facility Component limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
Yes-Government repair
work limited to installation
of product recovery tank
Tank Truck loading Facility and the repair work in Long-Term
other Building 115 items in
this report.
Tank Truck Loading Facility Yes Immediate
Building Restoration No Immediate
Building Restoration No long-Term
Sentry House No Long-Term
Fire Water System No Long-Term
Fire Water System No Long-Term
Building Resto ration No long-Term
17 OF 21
A-158
Existing or
~overnment Plans to Complet
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component Limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
Yes · Pipelines in scope are
CSFM 0070 (JPB). CSFM
0071 (JPS) and 8" G line.
292000, 292002 Work is limited to: repair
New 1.y (pipelines, Bu lk Reactivate Piping Fuel Pipe lines of pipe supports where Immediate
Fuels Area) slide plates are missing,
update signage. Work to
be completed in FY20 or
FY21.
292000, 292002
New 1.z (pipelines, Bulk Perf orm Pipeline Thermal Relief Study Fuel Pipelines No Long· Term
Fuels Area)
292073 (Electrical
New l.aa System, Bulk Fuels Upgrade Site Lighting lighting No Long· Term
A rea)
New 1.bb 292076, 292077 Add Bollards Around Fire Hydrants Safety No Long· Term
292080, 292083,
New l.cc 292084 (Parking
Areas, Bu lk Fuels
Repa ir Pavement Pavement No Long· Term
Area)
Yes· Government repairs
are limited to removal of
vegetation along fenceline,
repair of barbed wire
292088 (fence, Bulk outriggers and top rai l
New 1.dd Repa ir Fence Boundary Fence Boundary south of Building 113, Immediate
Fuels Area) repair of all gaps and ho les
in botttom of fence
throughout terminal,
insta llation of reinforcing
cab les near ASTs 48, 49, 50 .
292000, 292002
New l .ee (pipe lines, Bulk Repair Pipe Coating Fuel Pipelines No Long· Term
Fuels Area)
18 OF 21
A-159
Existing or
New Deficiency ID
New 2.a
New 2.b
New 2.c
New 2.d
New 2.e
Facility Deficiency Description
832 (Multi-purpose
Bui ld ing, Pier 12 Rep lace Back-Up Generator
Area)
832 (Multi-purpose
Bu ild in g, Pier 12 Replace Fire Ala r m Panel
Area)
832 (Multi-purpose
Building, Pier 12 Repair Multipurpose Building
A rea)
832, 833, 834, 847,
848, 849(Various
Repair Buildings
Buildings, Pier 12
Area)
833 (Mise building, Repair Office/Lab & Control Bu ilding
Pier 12 A rea)
Facility Component
Building Restoration
Bui lding Restoration
Building Restoration
Bui lding Restoration
Building Restoration
~overnment Plan s to Compl et
limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
Yes -Government repairs
limited to performance of
manufacturer
recommended
maintenance on generator Immediate and automatic transfer
switch to ensure
operational sta tus.
Yes-Government repairs
limited to replacement of
fire ala rm control panel and
means to communicate
with NWSSB Fire Immediate
Department.
No l ong-Term
No Short Term
No l ong-Term
19 OF 21
A-160
Existing or Deficiency ID
New
New 2.1
New 2.g
New 2.h
New 2.i
New 2 .j
New 2.k
New 2.1
Facility
834 (pumphouse,
Pier 12 Area)
834, 851
836
836, 837, 838, 842,
843, 844, 845, 846,
870 (Various Tanks,
Pier 12 A rea)
838, 840, 841, 843,
844, 845, 846, 870
(Various Tanks, Pier
12 Area)
847, 849 (Mise
Bu ild ings, Pier 12
Area)
851 (Fuel Pier, Pier
12 Area)
Deficiency Description
Reactivate Pumphouse
Repair Piping
Repair Piping
Tanks Clearances Not Met
Replace Tank ATG Systems and Grounding
Replace Panel b oards
Replace Emergency Shower/Eyewash Stations
Facility Component
Pumphouse
Tank Piping
Tank Pip ing
Tank Clearances
Tank Electrical
Electrical
Safety
~overnment Plans to Complet
Limited Scope of Repair
Work
Yes -Government will
perform limited repairs:
reconnect piping and insta ll
isolation va lves for each
pump, reconnect all
instrumentation and
controls to each pump,
perform manufacturer
Priority
recommended Immediate
maintenance for all pump
house components and
motor testing, replace roof
panels as necessary, update
sign age, repair all ground
connections as required.
No Long-Term
No Long-Term
No No Act ion Required
No Long-Term
No Long-Term
No Long-Term
20 OF 21
A-161
Existing or ~overnment Plans to Complet
New Deficiency ID Facility Deficiency Description Facility Component Limited Scope of Repair Priority
Work
New 2.m 851 (Fuel Pier, Pier Provide Canopy Over Equipment Pit on Pier 12 Pier 12 Equipment No No Act ion Required 12 Area)
New 2.n 851 (Fuel Pier, Pier Repa ir and Reconfigure Pier 12 Pier 12 Equipment No Long-Term
12 Area)
New 2.0
851 (Fue l Pier, Pie r
12 Area) Provide Traffic Bollards on Pier 12 Safety No Long-Term
Yes -Government will clean
and inert tank and piping,
demolish tank,
containment pad, above-
870 (Additive ground piping and
New 2.p System, Pier 12 Provide Grounding Tank Electrical appurtenances, slurry fill all Immediate underground piping and
A rea) backfill and grade as
necessary to match the
existing grade.
Yes -Government w ill
conduct API 653 out of
service inspections of these
New 2.q 836, 837, 838 Reactivate Tanks Aboveground Storage Tanks three tanks to determine Immediate suitabi lity for use . Reports
will be provided to all
interested parties when
completed .
21 OF 21
A-162
G. Attachment {2) -Facility Condition of Pipelines
DFSP San Pedro Pipelines
Item Diameter
Number (inches) Year of Last Usage for
Pipeline Name In-Service Date Length (feet) CFSM ID Number Location Start Location End Background Information Fuel Transport
1 Long Beach JP-5 (14") 14 1941 9,240 0660-00711 DFSP SP Valve 633 Harbor-Regan Valve Station See Item 2 Background Information. 2014
2 Long Beach JP-5 (18") 18 1984 18,216 0660-00712 Harbor-Regan Valve Station Pier 12 Marine Terminal Three parallel 18-inch pipelines run from the Harbor Regan Valve
Station to the Pier 12 Marine Terminal. A section of one such
pipeline, formerly used to transport DFM, was removed to the west
of the Pier 12 Marine Terminal*. The remainder of the DFM pipeline
and the other two pipelines have been filled with Nitrogen. The Long
Beach pipelines are made of Grade X-42 seamless steel pipe, 0 .312-
inch wall thickness and increasing to 0.500-inch wall thickness and to
18-inch diameter where the pipelines cross under the Los Angeles
Harbor Main Channel. The average pipeline depth underground is 45
inches below ground surface (bgs). The pipelines are coated with a 1-
inch thick, coal tar enamel, asphalt-saturated felt, or polyvinyl
coating and cathodically protected to reduce corrosion. A significant
portion of the pipeline is underwater and most of the underground
pipe route is in areas where excavation is difficult, therefore third
party damage is not a high risk.** External corrosion poses a
potential threat. The pipeline has passed numerous hydrostatic tests;
therefore, concerns over the longitudinal seams are minor. The
operating conditions for the pipeline are such that stress corrosion
cracking is not an active threat to this pipeline.
2014
3 Long Beach JP-8 (14") 14 1941 9,240 0660-00701 DFSP SP Valve 633 Harbor-Regan Valve Station See Item 2 Background Information. 2014
4 Long Beach JP-8 (18") 18 1984 18,216 0660-00702 Harbor-Regan Valve Station Pier 12 Marine Terminal See Item 2 Background Information. 2014
5 G Pipeline 8 1941 3,696 0660-0067 DFSP SP Main Tank Farm Phillips 66 refinery Current condition is unknown . The pipeline is filled with Nitrogen***.
2000
6 R Pipeline 12 1941 15,523 0660-0066 DFSP Main Tank Farm C St. & Island Ave. Current condition is unknown. The pipeline is cut and capped
outside the Main Terminal.****
2000
* 2011 Environmental Condition of Property
** 20111ntegrity Management Plan
*** 2016 Environmental Assessment
**** 2013 Integrity Management Plan
Source: 2016 EA, 2011 Integrity Management Plan, 2013 Integrity Management Plan, discussion with DLA.
A-163
APPENDIXD
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS N46247321RP006
DFEFENSE FUEL SUPPORT POINT (DFSP) SAN PEDRO
LEASE AND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY
OFFEROR'S COVER PAGE
(Name of Offeror) (Point of Contact)
(Street Address) (Telephone Number)
(City, State and Zip Code) (Fax Number)
(Electronic Mail Address)
1. This offer is valid for a period of 180 days from the date hereinafter written.
2. Receipt of amendment(s) [insert amendment number, if applicable] is acknowledged.
3. Statement of Authority to Release Proprietary Information
I hereby certify that I have read the Request for Proposals and understand and
approve of the release of the information in all proposal submittals to the Government
and its contractors for the purpose of providing advisory/consulting services in the
Government's evaluation of this Solicitation. I further understand that the Government
and its contractors will not disclose any confidential information identified as such in
these submissions.
4. Conflicts of Interest
I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge no potential conflict of interest exists
between the above-identified Offeror and The Concourse Group, which has served as
an advisor to the Navy on this project. As a condition of this offer, should my firm be
the Selected Offeror for negotiations by the Government, my firm will not contract at
any time with The Concourse Group nor any of its subcontractors for work relating to
this project.
Authorized representative and signatory for Offeror:
(Print) N arne Title Date
Signature
Request for Proposal N6247321RP006 A-164
DEPARTMENT OF
CITY PLANNING CITY OF Los ANGELES EXECUTIVE OFFICES
200 N. SPRING STREET, ROOM 525
Los ANGELES, CA 90012-4801
(213) 978-1271
COMMISSION OFFICE
(213) 978-1300
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
SAMANTHA MILLMAN
PRESIDENT
VAHID KHORSAND
VICE-PRESIDENT
DAVID H.J. AMBROZ
CAROLINE CHOE
HELEN LEUNG
KAREN MACK
MARC MITCHELL
VERONICA PADILLA-CAMPOS
DANA M. PERLMAN
CALIFORNIA
ERIC GARCETT!
MAYOR
VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP
DIRECTOR
KEVIN J. KELLER, AICP
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SHANA M.M. BONSTIN
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
TRICIA KEANE
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
ARTHI L. VARMA,AICP
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
LISA M . WEBBER, AICP
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
PONTE VISTA AT SAN PEDRO SPECIFIC PLAN
DIRECTOR'S INTERPRETATION
March 27, 2020
Owner/ Applicant
Brad Woomer
SoCal San Pedro SPV 1, LLC
6363 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Representative
Paul Garry
Psomas
555 South Flower Street,
Suite 4300
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Case No.
Related Case:
CEQA:
Location:
Council District:
Neighborhood Council:
Community Plan Area:
Specific Plan:
Land Use Designation:
Zone:
Legal Description:
DIR-2019-6616-DI
CPC-2012-2558-GPA-ZC-SP-CA
and DIR-2017-3010-DI
ENV-2005-4516-EIR
26900 and 27812 South Western
Avenue
15 -Buscaino
Northwest San Pedro
Wilmington -Harbor City
Ponte Vista at San Pedro
Low Medium II Residential
PVSP
Lot PT 1 and PT 2, TR 3192
Last Day to File an Appeal: April 13, 2020
Pursuant to the Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific Plan Sections 5.G and 10, and Los Angeles
Municipal Code Section 11.5.7.H and as the designee of the Director of Planning, I hereby provide
the following with respect to the above referenced Specific Plan :
Interpret that the proposed revisions to Subarea 4 (0.5% decrease in land area), Subarea
6 (0.1 % increase in land area), Subarea 7 (0.4% increase in land area) as having less
than a 15 percent change in land area in any subarea and therefore substantially comply
with those approved in the Specific Plan.
FIND, based on the independent judgement of the decision-maker, after consideration of the
whole of the administrative record, the project was assessed in Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific
Plan ENV-2005-4516-EIR No. 139754 certified on March 4, 2014; and pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15162 and 15164, no subsequent EIR, negative declaration or addendum is
required for approval of the Project.
This Interpretation does not waive compliance with any of the requirements as determined by the
Department of Building and Safety or any other City agency.
DIR-2019-6616-DI Page 1 of6
B-1
Request
The applicant requests a Specific Plan Interpretation to adjust Planning Subarea boundaries,
pursuant to Sections 5.G and 10 of the Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific Plan. Based upon
refined final designs for the project, the applicant has found it necessary to adjust the boundaries
for subareas 4,6, and 7 as contemplated by the approved Specific Plan.
Background
On November 27, 2013, the City Planning Commission took action on Case No. CPC-2012-2558-
GPA-ZC-SP-CA to approve the establishment of the Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific Plan. The
subject property is located within the Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific Plan, a 700-unit residential
community, including open space and recreational amenities at 26900 and 27812 S. Western
Avenue. The Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific Plan was established to ensure that land uses
and development on the large vacant area occur in a manner that enhances and complements
the surrounding community. The intent of the Specific Plan is to provide much needed single-
family and multi-family housing to serve the housing needs of the City of Los Angeles and to
enhance future commercial development of the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach
Harbor. The approved specific plan provides that:
The subarea boundaries shown upon the subarea plan exhibit in Figure II, and in greater detail in
Figures 11/-1 through 111-7 of this Specific Plan, are approximate, and subarea boundary
interpretations or adjustments may be made as part of the Project Permit Compliance review and
approval process under Section 10 of this Specific Plan when such subarea boundary
interpretations or adjustments meet the overall intent of the Specific Plan regarding location of
land uses, and/or when necessary to ensure that such subarea boundaries precisely coincide
with future street, alley or lot lines.
Adjustments in the boundaries of the Subareas and of further components thereof that result in
an increase or reduction of land area of any Subarea or component thereof of 15 percent or less
of the land area shall be permitted by the Planning Director as a Specific Plan Interpretation as
set forth in Section 10.
Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 11.5. 7 H states that the Director of Planning has the
authority to interpret Specific Plans when there is a lack of clarity in the meaning or regulations.
The applicant requests a Specific Plan Interpretation of the Ponte Vista Specific Plan, to clarify
Section 5 (Land Use), Subsection G (Adjustment to Boundaries).
On August 7, 2018, the Director of Planning approved a Director's Interpretation (Case No. DIR-
2017-3010-DI) for the adjustment of the boundaries for Subareas 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 as contemplated
by the approved Specific Plan. With respect to Subarea 1, it was necessary to increase the
acreage slightly to reflect design refinements primarily related to residential placement, grading,
and utility geometries. In Subarea 4 increased acreage to accommodate the spatial needs for
new wall foundation schemes associated with the proposed retaining wall (soil nail type) features
along the northerly property line. Subarea 5 had a slight increase in acreage to minimize loss of
proposed residential unit counts due to the effects of the retaining wall foundation needs. Subarea
6 decreased acreage slightly to reflect design refinements related to residential placement,
grading, and utility requirements. Subarea 7 decreased to accommodate the design refinements
to Subareas 1, 4, and 6. The applicant also proposed a slight increase to the acreage of the
publically accessible park located in the southwest corner of the property, adjacent to Western
Avenue in Subarea 7. The overall proposed acreage for open space remained above Specific
DIR-2019-6616-DI Page 2 of 6
B-2
Plan requirements. The adjustment of the subarea boundaries represented a less than 15 percent
change in land area. The Director's Interpretation was not appealed, and became effective on
August 22, 2018.
Discussion
Subsequent to the approval of the August 7, 2018 Director's Interpretation, the applicant has
requested a second Director's Interpretation, as the location of dwelling units on the site plan have
shifted to accommodate varying residential unit designs, slope, required setbacks, access and
circulation requirements. In effect, there are two locations where dwelling units or the required
guest parking for dwelling units encroach into Subarea 7. To improve the proposed development's
operation while maintaining the number of dwelling units, the Applicant has found it necessary to
adjust the boundaries of the Subareas without exceeding a fifteen percent change in land area.
Based upon the refined site plan for the project, the Applicant requests to adjust the boundaries
for Subareas 4, 6, and 7 as contemplated by the approved Specific Plan and the approved
Director's Interpretation. With respect to Subarea 4, it is necessary to increase the land area to
accommodate parking requirements for the revised residential placement. Subarea 7 is altered
to accommodate these design refinements for Subarea 4 and Subarea 6 and is proposed to
increase slightly in land area. Overall, the Project will provide more open space than required by
the Specific Plan.
The proposed adjustment of the subarea boundaries are shown upon the Subarea Plan "Exhibit
A", dated February 18, 2020. The proposed adjustments in the boundaries of the subareas
represents less than a cumulative 15 percent change in land area. As discussed below, the
proposed project complies with the applicable Land Use Regulations as set forth in Section 5 of
the Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific Plan as evidence below:
Boundary Adjustment.
The Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific Plan subarea boundaries will be adjusted as follows:
Land Area Land Area approved
approved per per August 7, 2018 Proposed Proposed
Specific Plan Director's Increase/Decrease Land Area
Subarea (Acre) Interpretation (Acre) in Land Area (Acre) (Acre)
1 9.7 acres 10.1 (0.4 acre increase) No Change 10.1 acres
2 5.7 acres 5.7 (No change) No change 5.7 acres
3 7.2 acres 7.2 (No change) No change 7.2 acres
4 7.4 (0.5 acre increase) 0.04 acre decrease
6.9 acres (0.5%) 7.4 acres
5 8.1 acres 8.1 (0.02 acre increase) No change 8.1 acres
6 9.3 (0.2 acre increase) 0.003 acre increase
9.5 acres (0.1%) 9.3 acres
7 13.6 (0.8 acre 0.04 acre increase
14.3 acres reduction) (0.4%) 13.6 acres
Total 61.4 acres 61.4 acres
DIR-2019-6616-DI Page 3 of6
B-3
The resulting change to land area from the combined Director's Interpretations are as follows:
Land Area Total Increase/Decrease in Land Area
approved per from the combined Director's Proposed
Specific Plan Interpretations (Approved and Land Area
Subarea (Acre) Proposed) (acre)
1 9.7 acres 0.4 acre increase (4.1%) 10.1 acres
2 5.7 acres No chanoe 5.7 acres
3 7.2 acres No chanoe 7.2 acres
4 6.9 acres 0.45 acre increase (6.5%) 7.4 acres
5 8.1 acres 0.02 acre increase (0.2%) 8.1 acres
6 9.5 acres 0. 19 acre decrease ( 2%) 9.3 acres
7 14.3 acres 0.76 acre reduction (5.3%) 13.6 acres
Total 61.4 acres 1.82 acre total change (2.9%) 61.4 acres
As shown in the table above, the proposed adjustments in the boundaries of the subareas
represents less than a cumulative 15 percent change in land area from the initial Specific Plan
approval. The combined change in land area from the previously approved and currently
proposed Director's Interpretations results in a 2.9 percent change of the total land area.
This adjustment request does not modify Table No. 1 of Specific Plan Section 5.C.1 as it was
approved by Case No. DIR-2017-3010-DI on August 7, 2018. Table No. 1 shall remain as follows
(strikethrough is original text from the Specific Plan, bold and underline is approved text from the
Case No. DIR-2017-3010-DI):
Subarea Maximum Area (Gross
No. Use Dwellinq Units DU/Acre Acres)
1 Single-Family 69 8 8.-7 10.1
2 Single-Family 60 11 5.7
3 Single-Family 79 11 7.2
4 Townhomes 140 21 &.-8 7.4
Townhomes &
5 Flats 140 18 8.1
6 Flats 212 23 9,-a 9.3
Open
7 Space/Recreation N/A N/A ~ 13.6
TOTAL 700 11.4 (avo) 61.4
The Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific Plan states the boundaries of the seven subareas are
approximate and may be interpreted or adjusted as long as the resulting increase or decrease in
land area is equal to or less than 15 percent of the total land area. The adjustments authorized
by this interpretation account for 2.9 percent which is less than 15 percent of the total land area.
Therefore, the adjustments comply with the regulations of the Ponte Vista at San Pedro Specific
Plan.
DIR-2019-6616-D/ Page 4 of6
B-4
TRANSFERABILITY
This determination runs with the land. In the event the property is to be sold, leased , rented or
occupied by any person or corporation other than yourself, it is incumbent that you advise them
regarding the conditions of this grant. If any portion of this approval is utilized, then all other
conditions and requirements set forth herein become immediately operative and must be strictly
observed.
VIOLATIONS OF THESE CONDITIONS, A MISDEMEANOR
Section 11.00 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code states in part (m): "It shall be unlawful to violate
any provision or fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Code. Any person violating any
of the provisions or failing to comply with any of the mandatory requirements of this Code shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor unless that violation or failure is declared in that section to be an
infraction. An infraction shall be tried and be punishable as provided in Section 19 .6 of the Penal
Code and the provisions of this section. Any violation of this Code that is designated as a
misdemeanor may be charged by the City Attorney as either a misdemeanor or an infraction.
Every violation of this determination is punishable as a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by
a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than
six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment."
APPEAL PERIOD-EFFECTIVE DATE
The applicant's attention is called to the fact that this grant is not a permit or license and that any
permits and licenses required by law must be obtained from the proper public
agency. Furthermore , if any condition of this grant is violated the applicant or his successor in
interest may be prosecuted for violating these conditions in the manner of any violation of the
requirements contained in the Municipal Code, or the approval may be revoked.
The determination in this matter will become effective and final, fifteen (15) days after the
date of mailing of the Director's Determination unless an appeal is filed with the City Planning
Department. It is strongly advised that appeals be filed early during the appeal period and in
person so that imperfections/incompleteness may be corrected before the appeal period expires.
Any appeal must be filed on the prescribed forms, accompanied by the required fee, a copy of
this Determination, and received and receipted at a public office of the Department of City
Planning on or before the above date or the appeal will not be accepted. Forms are available on-
line at http://planning.lacity.org.
Planning Department public offices are located at:
Figueroa Plaza
201 North Figueroa Street,
4th Floor
Los Angeles , CA 90012
(213) 482-7077
Marvin Braude San Fernando Valley
Constituent Service Center
6262 Van Nuys Boulevard,
Room 251
Van Nuys, CA 91401
(818) 374-5050
West Los Angeles Development
Services Center
1828 Sawtelle Boulevard,
2nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90025
(310) 231-2912
The time in which a party may see judicial review of this determination is governed by California
Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6. Under that provision, a petitioner may seek judicial
review of any decision of City pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, only
if the petition for writ of mandate pursuant to that section is filed no later than the 90 th day following
the date on which the City's decision becomes final .
D/R-2019-6616-DI Page 5of6
B-5
VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP
Director of Planning
Approved by:
Reviewed by:
DIR-2019-6616-DI
Prepared by:
0~
e lee Obergfell, City Planning Associate
je nalee .obergfell@lacity.org
Page 6 of6
B-6
·.JI ·~~~~~~~
~~~-:.1::;~;;r.i;lc:".::=:..,,
SUBAREA 1
!10 .1AC!
SUBAR EA6
!9.3AC !
lsuBAREA 7 = 1 o.6 AC I
SUBAREA3
!7.2AC !
L-SUBA RE A7A
!3.0A~
-------------------------------~
PONTE VISTA AT SAN PEDRO -SUBAREA PLAN EXHIBIT
10 .08.2019
,.
) 1
EXHIBIT "fl:.'
Page No . l of __.._~_
Case No. ou2-'2--0t o/-li&I b -OI
i
GRAPHIC SCALE
F,.-... LJ-t i t lll'nff ,
JiDob-SXlft.
FIGURE -II
SUB ARE A BOUND A RIE S C-1
!J
0 ~ q;
l ~
ff} s
I \ \' \v ,,,:
--
SUBAREA 1
10.1 AC
\
'"'FUSCOE
P ONTE VISTA AT SAN PEDRO -SUBAREA 1
I •• I I I I I I I f 10.08.2019
~~~;;~a~•,'::.01t;;.:;:_-:~l':1=:::1,_
f:\PROJfCTS\1108\001\_ENf/QDJCNT ARCHN£\EXH!9/TS\SPECfrlC Pl.NI D(HIBITS\11080/XH -SUB AREA PU,N £XHl8ff.DWG (lo -0·!-!9 •:J5:J IPM) Ploflld by: Merlin lilo,,os!erio
\
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
KEY MAP
SCALE 1··=ww
EXHIBIT "fl:.'
Page No . 2-ot ~8=---
~ase No . p 1\2 -u.>1C,-lpt,,/ !e_:_Q_
"
~
GRAPHIC SCALE J~_. •• ;__;-;r i
l ~~!~J ft.
FIGURE -III-!
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA C-2
r'
I
I
_ _/
, ,
l_ I
----I ---- J -----
I
I
I
I-0
~00 ~ I -~. >< 0 0
2 z
W (1) Cl)
O> en ro m
Q. 0
/
I
!:Ii; ... .. ~ -= " ~-----------§
<( w
0::
";' <(
::::z
H <(
'...J w n. o::o ::,-
(.'.) ~ -o LL W
0..
(/)
.
!
i d !
! ! i w·t o·•• u :H ""-o.. I :, . ,! j
u. ·h '
ra! =,~ i. ~:ii ! C-3
_ _/
(/
/
~-~--, --, ,1 , t.i I
, / I
/~ J
, ' ,
·--1/
J
ICI -VJ IP/l)-hl9"l-rlla ·oN ase8
10--,::;-'ON a6ed
"'ti,, ll81HX3 :
1 (
-. !:Ii; -==7-..---'" .. ~ -= "
~
1 .
<{ w
0::
M <{
~z
-<{ '...J wo.. o::u ::,-
<9e!: -u u. w
0..
(f)
C-4
PONTE VIS TA AT SAN PEDRO -SUBAREA 4
·-~~~~~~ 10 .08.2019
~~~~~.1::ii~.::r.-:;1c:':::",.:!~..,,
KEY MAP
SCALE 1·=1000·
I EXHIBIT "fl!..'
Page No . 'S'"' of_~=----
Case No. 9,p -io,q-e,1p1 f, -1>1
i
GRAPHIC S CALE
k.-..tJ:....fa i
(UfnsT')
J b>All -um n.
FIGURE-III-4
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA C-5
I
, , /
, -,-
',,
I' -i --;--.-, __
I I '
I
C-6
--------
I I
I
. I i
I
<( w
O'. "i' <(
::::: z
-<( '...J w (l_ o::u ::J-
(.9~ -o LL W
(l_
(fJ
C-7
.J -~~~~~~~
~;-;";';"i!;;;'".1 !:ai~.::■':.ic:':::.'.!:!.~-
!!f
$ :::;
"{' I,
l
LLJ -f:.,:.
(./)'
LLJ ' " ~ s , -
LLJ , .:::>;
~
~I
~I i1•"_
; .:::~t.::f.J,f'
---./
I
l.
/ .,: .. __ ..
SUBAR EA 7A
13.0 A C I
tar --_, _._,
lsusAREA 7 = 10 .6 AC I
P ON TE VISTA AT SAN PEDRO-SUBAREA 7 & 7A
10.08.2019
I
I
I
KEY MAP
SCAL E f":fOOCJ'
: EXHIBIT "A" I
I Page l\lo g of_~_· , I Case No.1>1~ -1-411-ut,l t, -o I I
i
GRAPHIC SCALE
~sJ.;):..l,a llm
(llf lSff )
JJno.b -~ ft.
FIGURE -III-7
SPECIFIC PLA N A REA C-8
The Estates at Ponte Vista
Subarea 1
D-1
We Are
America's
Builder
In 1978, D.R. Horton broke ground on our first
home in Fort Worth, Texas.
We’ve delivered more than 755,000 homes to
our nation’s customers since our company’s
inception.
Since 2002, more homebuyers have chosen
D.R. Horton than any other national builder.
We operate in 43 of homebuilding’s top 50
markets in the U.S., and rank among the top
five in 31 of these.
Our team of 7,000 marketing experts are
spread across the nation in 29 states and 89
markets.
D-2
Home for every stage in life.
Family of Brands
D-3
D-4
D-5
SUBAREA 1 –66 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMESD-6
ZONING :PVSP
GENERAL PLAN :LOW MEDIUM II RESIDENTIAL
SPECIFIC PLAN :PONTE VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN
SUB AREA 1 AREA :436,035 S.F. (10.01 ACRES)
DENSITY :6.57 DU/ACRE
PROPOSED NUMBER OF DWELING UNITS :66
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DWELLING UNITS IN SUB AREA 1
PER SPECIFIC PLAN SECTION 5.C.1 :69 DU
COMBINED FLOOR AREA: 229,000 SF.
SUBAREA 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.52:1
NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED :248
RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIRED PER SPECIFIC PLAN
SECTION 7.B :
132 COVERED + 116 DRIVEWAY.
2 SPACES PER DU: 66 COVERED; 66 UNCOVERED
GUEST PARKING SPACES PROVIDED:APPROXIMATE 90 CURBSIDE PARKING SPACES
MINIMUM GUEST PARKING REQUIRED PER DESIGN
GUIDELINES SECTION 2.4 & SPECIFIC PLAN SECTION 7.B :0.25 SPACES/ UNIT (17 SPACES)
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED/PROVIDED :PER SPECIFIC PLAN, OPEN SPACE IS PROVIDED IN SUB AREA 7
NUMBER OF STORY: 2
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 30'-0" MAX.
TOTAL No. OF TREES IN PARKWAY PA1:105
TOTAL No. OF TREES IN COMMON AREA PA1: 45
TOTAL SF. PARKWAY AREA PA1:21,400 SF.
TOTAL SF. OPEN SPACE AREA PA1: 39,700 SF
SUBAREA 1 COMMUNITY SUMMARYD-7
SUBAREA 1 ELEVATION STYLESD-8
PLAN 1D-9
PLAN 2D-10
PLAN 3D-11
PLAN 1AD-12
PLAN 1BD-13
PLAN 1CD-14
PLAN 1DD-15
PLAN 2AD-16
PLAN 2BD-17
PLAN 2CD-18
PLAN 2DD-19
PLAN 3AD-20
PLAN 3BD-21
PLAN 3CD-22
PLAN 3DD-23
Questions ?
D-24
Thank You!
D-25
Ponte VistaEntry Gates and Monument SignsPonte Vista Entry Gates and Monument Signs Neighborhood Council PresentationE-1
Ponte Vista Entry Gates and Monument Signs Neighborhood Council PresentationE-2
Three sets of entryways are proposed: • Northern Entry Gate • Southern Entry Gate• Monument Signs Entry Northern Entry GateMonument Signs EntrySouthern Entry GatePonte Vista Entry Gates and Monument Signs Neighborhood Council PresentationE-3
Ponte Vista Northern Entry GateAccess controlled entryway with backlit metal cut out Ponte Vista sign.Ponte Vista Entry Gates and Monument Signs Neighborhood Council PresentationE-4
Ponte Vista Southern Entry GateAccess controlled entryway.Ponte Vista Entry Gates and Monument Signs Neighborhood Council PresentationE-5
Ponte Vista Monument Sign EntryWelcoming entry with twin identification monument signs.Ponte Vista Entry Gates and Monument Signs Neighborhood Council PresentationE-6
Questions?Ponte Vista Entry Gates and Monument Signs Neighborhood Council PresentationE-7
Thank you. Ponte Vista Entry Gates and Monument Signs Neighborhood Council PresentationE-8