CC SR 20190219 03 - SB 50 and Potential Impacts01203.0005/534376.1 1
RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019
AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration and possible action to receive and file a report on Senate Bill 50 and its
potential impacts on the City.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:
(1) Receive and file a report on Senate Bill 50 which would provide significant
density and parking bonuses for housing developments within a job-rich area
or within a certain distance of a high quality bus corridor or a major transit
stop and its potential impacts on the City; and,
(2) Provide direction to Staff and the City Attorney’s Office regarding the City’s
involvement in supporting or opposing the bill.
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
Amount Budgeted: N/A
Additional Appropriation: N/A
Account Number(s): N/A
ORIGINATED BY: William W. Wynder, City Attorney
REVIEWED BY: Ara Mihranian, Director of Community Development
APPROVED BY: Doug Willmore, City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
A. Text of SB 50 as of February 12, 2019 (page A-1)
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
Senate Bill 50 (Planning and Zoning: Housing Development Equitable Communities
Incentive) is a housing bill designed to encourage housing development in high -priority
housing areas, such as job-rich or transit-rich areas, by requiring local governments to
offer equitable communities incentives to developers who build in those areas.
The bill was introduced by Senator Scott Wiener (D - SD 11) on December 3, 2018, and
is co-authored by a number of legislators, to wit: Senators Caballero (D – SD 12),
Hueso (D – SD 40), Moorlach (R- SD 37), and Skinner (D – SD 9) , as well as
Assembly Members Burke (D – AD 62), Kalra (D – AD 27), Kiley (R – AD 6), Low (D –
1
01203.0005/534376.1 2
AD 28), Robert Rivas (D – AD 30), Ting (D – AD 19), and Wicks (D – AD 15).1 It should
be noted that this bill is early in the process and may undergo substantive changes
before its implementation.
On January 24, 2019, the bill was referred to the Committees on Housing, and
Government & Finance. If additional action occurs prior to the City Council meeting on
February 19th, Staff will provide an update at the meeting. The League of California
Cities has not taken a position yet, but is tracking it as a bill to watch.
The bill would require cities to provide, upon request by a developer, density and
parking incentives for housing developments that meet certain requirements. The
requirements include:
The development is either a “job-rich housing project” or a “transit-rich housing
project.” A “job-rich housing project” means a residential development within an
area identified by the Department of Housing and Community Development and
the Office of Planning and Research, based on indicators such as proximity to
jobs, high area median income relative to the relevant region, and high-quality
public schools as an area of high opportunity close to jobs. A “transit-rich housing
project” means a residential development that is within ½ mile radius of a major
transit stop or ¼ mile radius of a stop on a “high-quality bus corridor.” A “major
transit stop” means a site containing an existing rail transit station or a ferry
terminal served by either bus or rail transit service. A “high-quality bus corridor”
means a corridor with fixed route bus service with a frequency of every 15 t o 30
minutes, depending on time of day.
The development is located on a site that is zoned to allow housing as an
underlying use in the zone.
Depending on whether the city has adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance or
not, either the development complies with the inclusionary housing requirements
of the ordinance, and absent such an ordinance, the development has a certain
number of affordable housing units (the number is not specified yet in the bill).
The site does not, and has not, contained: housing occupied by tenants for the 7
years preceding the application; a parcel of land on which the owner has
exercised his or her rights under Section 7060 to withdraw accommodations from
rent in the 15 years preceding the application.
The development complies with all local development standards relating to
architectural design, restrictions on demolition, impact fees, and community
benefits agreements.
1 The authors districts, by location: SD 11 (San Francisco and parts of San Mateo County); SD 12
(Salinas Valley and part of the Central Valley); SD 40 (Imperial County and the border regions of San
Diego County); SD 37 (portion of Orange County); SD 9 (East Bay); AD 62 (portions of the Westside and
South Bay regions of LA County); AD 27 (parts of eastern San Jose); AD 6 (outer ring of northern and
eastern Sacramento suburbs); AD 28 (parts of the South Bay and Silicon Valley); AD 19 (western San
Francisco and northern San Mateo County); and AD 15 (Berkeley and Richmond)
2
01203.0005/534376.1 3
If the requirements are met, the developer is en titled to receive the incentive upon
request. The incentives include no limit on density and parking requirements of no more
than 0.5 parking spaces per unit, as well as other housing density bonus incentives and
concessions described under Section 65915 of the Government Code.
For eligible developments that are located within certain distances from major transit
stops and have an as-yet unidentified number of affordable housing units, the incentives
include being able to build to a height of 45 or 55 feet, and more generous floor area
ratio (FAR) requirements. FAR is a tool used to limit the size of a particular dwelling. It
uses a mathematical formula to compare the square footage of the dwelling to the land
it is built on. By allowing a larger FAR, the waivers here would allow for larger buildings
on any given piece of property.
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes primarily consists of residential-zoned properties with
limited commercial-zoned properties and a single commercial corridor along Western
Avenue. While there are no “major transit stops (rail or ferry terminal served by either
bus or transit service)”, the City does have bus service with a frequency of every 15 to
30 minutes (e.g. DASH along Western Avenue and Line 344 along Hawthorne Blvd.),
which is considered a “high-quality bus corridor.” This means that a “transit-rich housing
development” could be possible within ¼ mile radius along these bus service corridors.
While the bill is in its early draft stages, the incentives for eligible projects, such as
transit-rich housing development could override the City’s low density zoning, as well as
possibly exempting projects from adhering to the City’s height, Neighborhood
Compatibility, and View Ordinance discretionary review processes. There is a high
concern with the passage of SB50 as it could potentially change the character of the
City with high-rise projects in what is predominantly single-family residential. That said,
the size of typical residential lots located along Hawthorne Blvd. would probably not
support a high density project, but properties along Western Avenue would probably be
more likely to qualify as a potential candidate for a “transit-rich housing development” if
this bill were to pass.
The bill also has a provision allowing sensitive communities to postpone enactment of
the bill until January 1, 2020. “Sensitive community” is defined as an area vulnerable to
displacement pressures, based on certain criteria, and designated by the Department of
Housing and Community Development. These communities could postpone
implementation of the bill and could instead opt for a community-led planning process
aimed toward increasing residential density and multi-family housing choices near
transit stops. As the City does not have any areas that would be considered a sensitive
community, this provision would not apply and the bill would be enacted upon passage.
3
SHARE THIS:Date Published: 12/03/2018 09:00 PM
SB-50 Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable communities incentive.(2019-2020)
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2019–2020 REGULAR SESSION
SENATE BILL No. 50
Introduced by Senator Wiener
(Coauthors: Senators Caballero, Hueso, Moorlach, and Skinner)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Burke, Kalra, Kiley, Low, Robert Rivas, Ting, and Wicks)
December 03, 2018
An act to add Chapter 4.35 (commencing with Section 65918.50) to Division 1 of Title 7 of the
Government Code, relating to housing.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSELʹS DIGEST
SB 50, as introduced, Wiener. Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable communities incentive.
Existing law, known as the Density Bonus Law, requires, when an applicant proposes a housing development
within the jurisdiction of a local government, that the city, county, or city and county provide the developer with a
density bonus and other incentives or concessions for the production of lower income housing units or for the
donation of land within the development if the developer, among other things, agrees to construct a specified
percentage of units for very low, low-, or moderate-income households or qualifying residents.
This bill would require a city, county, or city and county to grant upon request an equitable communities incentive
when a development proponent seeks and agrees to construct a residential development, as defined, that
satisfies specified criteria, including, among other things, that the residential development is either a job-rich
housing project or a transit-rich housing project, as those terms are defined; the site does not contain, or has not
contained, housing occupied by tenants or accommodations withdrawn from rent or lease in accordance with
specified law within specified time periods; and the residential development complies with specified additional
requirements under existing law. The bill would require that a residential development eligible for an equitable
communities incentive receive waivers from maximum controls on density and automobile parking requirements
greater than 0.5 parking spots per unit, up to 3 additional incentives or concessions under the Density Bonus
Law, and specified additional waivers if the residential development is located within a 1/2-mile or 1/4-mile radius
of a major transit stop, as defined. The bill would authorize a local government to modify or expand the terms of
an equitable communities incentive, provided that the equitable communities incentive is consistent with these
provisions.
The bill would include findings that the changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather
Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites
Bill Text - SB-50 Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable... https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201...
1 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM
A-1
than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The bill would also declare the
intent of the Legislature to delay implementation of this bill in sensitive communities, as defined, until July 1,
2020, as provided.
By adding to the duties of local planning officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs
mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.Chapter 4.35 (commencing with Section 65918.50) is added to Division 1 of Title 7 of the
Government Code, to read:
CHAPTER 4.35. Equitable Communities Incentives
65918.50.For purposes of this chapter:
(a) “Affordable” means available at affordable rent or affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons and
families of extremely low, very low, low, or moderate incomes, as specified in context, and subject to a recorded
affordability restriction for at least 55 years.
(b) “Development proponent” means an applicant who submits an application for an equitable communities
incentive pursuant to this chapter.
(c) “Eligible applicant” means a development proponent who receives an equitable communities incentive.
(d) “FAR” means floor area ratio.
(e) “High-quality bus corridor” means a corridor with fixed route bus service that meets all of the following
criteria:
(1) It has average service intervals of no more than 15 minutes during the three peak hours between 6 a.m. to
10 a.m., inclusive, and the three peak hours between 3 p.m. and 7 p.m., inclusive, on Monday through Friday.
(2) It has average service intervals of no more than 20 minutes during the hours of 6 a.m. to 10 a.m., inclusive,
on Monday through Friday.
(3) It has average intervals of no more than 30 minutes during the hours of 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., inclusive, on
Saturday and Sunday.
(f) “Job-rich housing project” means a residential development within an area identified by the Department of
Housing and Community Development and the Office of Planning and Research, based on indicators such as
proximity to jobs, high area median income relative to the relevant region, and high-quality public schools, as an
area of high opportunity close to jobs. A residential development shall be deemed to be within an area designated
as job-rich if both of the following apply:
(1) All parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area outside of the job-rich area.
(2) No more than 10 percent of residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, of the development are outside of
the job-rich area.
(g) “Local government” means a city, including a charter city, a county, or a city and county.
(h) “Major transit stop” means a site containing an existing rail transit station or a ferry terminal served by
either bus or rail transit service.
(i) “Residential development” means a project with at least two-thirds of the square footage of the development
designated for residential use.
(j) “Sensitive community” means an area identified by the Department of Housing and Community Development,
in consultation with local community-based organizations in each region, as an area vulnerable to displacement
pressures, based on indicators such as percentage of tenant households living at, or under, the poverty line
Bill Text - SB-50 Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable... https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201...
2 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM
A-2
relative to the region.
(k) “Tenant” means a person residing in any of the following:
(1) Residential real property rented by the person under a long-term lease.
(2) A single-room occupancy unit.
(3) An accessory dwelling unit that is not subject to, or does not have a valid permit in accordance with, an
ordinance adopted by a local agency pursuant to Section 65852.22.
(4) A residential motel.
(5) Any other type of residential property that is not owned by the person or a member of the person’s
household, for which the person or a member of the person’s household provides payments on a regular schedule
in exchange for the right to occupy the residential property.
(l) “Transit-rich housing project” means a residential development the parcels of which are all within a one-half
mile radius of a major transit stop or a one-quarter mile radius of a stop on a high-quality bus corridor. A project
shall be deemed to be within a one-half mile radius of a major transit stop or a one-quarter mile radius of a stop
on a high-quality bus corridor if both of the following apply:
(1) All parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area outside of a one-half mile radius of a
major transit stop or a one-quarter mile radius of a stop on a high-quality bus corridor.
(2) No more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, of the project are outside of a
one-half mile radius of a major transit stop or a one-quarter mile radius of a stop on a high-quality bus corridor.
65918.51.(a) A local government shall, upon request of a development proponent, grant an equitable communities
incentive, as specified in Section 65918.53, when the development proponent seeks and agrees to construct a
residential development that satisfies the requirements specified in Section 65918.52.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature that, absent exceptional circumstances, actions taken by a local legislative
body that increase residential density not undermine the equitable communities incentive program established by
this chapter.
65918.52.In order to be eligible for an equitable communities incentive pursuant to this chapter, a residential
development shall meet all of the following criteria:
(a) The residential development is either a job-rich housing project or transit-rich housing project.
(b) The residential development is located on a site that, at the time of application, is zoned to allow housing as
an underlying use in the zone, including, but not limited to, a residential, mixed-use, or commercial zone, as
defined and allowed by the local government.
(c) (1) If the local government has adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance requiring that the development
include a certain number of units affordable to households with incomes that do not exceed the limits for
moderate-income, lower income, very low income, or extremely low income specified in Sections 50079.5, 50093,
50105, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code, and that ordinance requires that a new development include
levels of affordable housing in excess of the requirements specified in paragraph (2), the residential development
complies with that ordinance.
(2) If the local government has not adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance, as described in paragraph (1),
and the residential development includes ____ or more residential units, the residential development includes
onsite affordable housing for households with incomes that do not exceed the limits for extremely low income,
very low income, and low income specified in Sections 50093, 50105, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code.
It is the intent of the Legislature to require that any development of ____ or more residential units receiving an
equitable communities incentive pursuant to this chapter include housing affordable to low, very low or extremely
low income households, which, for projects with low or very low income units, are no less than the number of
onsite units affordable to low or very low income households that would be required pursuant to subdivision (f) of
Section 65915 for a development receiving a density bonus of 35 percent.
(d) The site does not contain, or has not contained, either of the following:
(1) Housing occupied by tenants within the seven years preceding the date of the application, including housing
Bill Text - SB-50 Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable... https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201...
3 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM
A-3
that has been demolished or that tenants have vacated prior to the application for a development permit.
(2) A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised his or her rights under
Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw accommodations from rent or
lease within 15 years prior to the date that the development proponent submits an application pursuant to this
chapter.
(e) The residential development complies with all applicable labor, construction employment, and wage standards
otherwise required by law and any other generally applicable requirement regarding the approval of a
development project, including, but not limited to, the local government’s conditional use or other discretionary
permit approval process, the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)
of the Public Resources Code), or a streamlined approval process that includes labor protections.
(f) The residential development complies with all other relevant standards, requirements, and prohibitions
imposed by the local government regarding architectural design, restrictions on or oversight of demolition, impact
fees, and community benefits agreements.
(g) The equitable communities incentive shall not be used to undermine the economic feasibility of delivering low-
income housing under the state density bonus program or a local implementation of the state density bonus
program, or any locally adopted program that puts conditions on new development applications on the basis of
receiving a zone change or general plan amendment in exchange for benefits such as increased affordable
housing, local hire, or payment of prevailing wages.
65918.53.(a) A residential development that meets the criteria specified in Section 65918.52 shall receive, upon
request, an equitable communities incentive as follows:
(1) Any eligible applicant shall receive the following:
(A) A waiver from maximum controls on density.
(B) A waiver from maximum automobile parking requirements greater than 0.5 automobile parking spots per
unit.
(C) Up to three incentives and concessions pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 65915.
(2) An eligible applicant proposing a residential development that is located within a one-half mile radius, but
outside a one-quarter mile radius, of a major transit stop and includes no less than ____ percent affordable
housing units shall receive, in addition to the incentives specified in paragraph (1), waivers from all of the
following:
(A) Maximum height requirements less than 45 feet.
(B) Maximum FAR requirements less than 2.5.
(C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), any maximum automobile parking requirement.
(3) An eligible applicant proposing a residential development that is located within a one-quarter mile radius of a
major transit and includes no less than ____ percent affordable housing units shall receive, in addition to the
incentives specified in paragraph (1), waivers from all of the following:
(A) Maximum height requirements less than 55 feet.
(B) Maximum FAR requirements less than 3.25.
(C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), any maximum automobile parking requirement.
(4) Notwithstanding any other law, for purposes of calculating any additional incentive or concession in
accordance with Section 65915, the number of units in the residential development after applying the equitable
communities incentive received pursuant to this chapter shall be used as the base density for calculating the
incentive or concession under that section.
(5) An eligible applicant proposing a project that meets all of the requirements under Section 65913.4 may
submit an application for streamlined, ministerial approval in accordance with that section.
(b) The local government may modify or expand the terms of an equitable communities incentive provided
pursuant to this chapter, provided that the equitable communities incentive is consistent with, and meets the
Bill Text - SB-50 Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable... https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201...
4 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM
A-4
minimum standards specified in, this chapter.
65918.54.The Legislature finds and declares that this chapter addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than
a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, this
chapter applies to all cities, including charter cities.
65918.55.(a) It is the intent of the Legislature that implementation of this chapter be delayed in sensitive
communities until July 1, 2020.
(b) It is further the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that does all of the following:
(1) Between January 1, 2020, and ____, allows a local government, in lieu of the requirements of this chapter, to
opt for a community-led planning process aimed toward increasing residential density and multifamily housing
choices near transit stops.
(2) Encourages sensitive communities to opt for a community-led planning process at the neighborhood level to
develop zoning and other policies that encourage multifamily housing development at a range of income levels to
meet unmet needs, protect vulnerable residents from displacement, and address other locally identified priorities.
(3) Sets minimum performance standards for community plans, such as minimum overall residential development
capacity and the minimum affordability standards set forth in this chapter.
(4) Automatically applies the provisions of this chapter on January 1, 2025, to sensitive communities that do not
have adopted community plans that meet the minimum standards described in paragraph (3), whether those
plans were adopted prior to or after enactment of this chapter.
SEC. 2.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or
assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of
Section 17556 of the Government Code.
Bill Text - SB-50 Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable... https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201...
5 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM
A-5