Loading...
20130205 Late CorrespondenceThe how-to guide for afaster commute on the lio and iofreeways EXPRESS LANES ENTRANCE 1/2 MILE RIP AA - Op J moil WAN 8368 Welcome to Metro ExpressLanes — faster commutes and more transportation choices. Starting this Saturday, November 10, the carpool lanes on the 110 Harbor Freeway — between the 91 freeway and Adams Boulevard in downtown Los Angeles — will become Metro ExpressLanes. For the first time, these lanes will be open to solo drivers for a toll. All drivers will need a FasTrak® transponder to use the ExpressLanes. Carpools with two or more people, vanpools and motorcycles with a FasTrak will continue to travel toll-free. And early next year, commuters on the 10 EI Monte Busway — between the 605 freeway and Alameda Street in downtown Los Angeles —will also have access to newly -converted ExpressLanes. Our goal is to move more people — not more vehicles — by offering more transportation choices. The program features and benefits include: > Carpool Loyalty Program for carpools, vanpools and motorcycles Sign up for a FasTrak account and receive your transponder. > New EI Monte Station 0 > Widened Adams Boulevard off -ramp and added a new lane on Adams Boulevard > New Patsaouras Plaza Station > Toll credits for frequent transit riders > New pedestrian bridge on Adams Boulevard providing direct connection to the new Metro Expo Line 23rd/Flower Station > Expanded platform and parking spaces at the Metrolink Pomona Station > Lighting and security improvements at the Harbor Transitway Stations > Nine miles of new lanes in each direction on the 10 freeway between the 605 and 710 freeways > New bus stops at the Manchester and Slauson Stations > 10o new vanpools > New bike lockers at Harbor Gateway Transit Center and new bike hub at EI Monte Station > LA Express Park`" parking systems > More than 2,400 construction -related jobs and 50 operations and maintenance jobs > Reduced congestion and greenhouse gas emissions 2 metroexpresslanes.net Mount the FasTrak transponder in your vehicle. ©Before each trip, set the FasTrak transponder to indicate how many people are in your vehicle. Enter the ExpressLanes at designated FasTrak entry points. . Save time! All vehicles will need a pre -paid FasTrak transponder to access the Metro ExpressLanes. This small radio-frequency device adheres to the inside of your car's windshield. Every time you drive, just indicate the number of occupants in the vehicle by setting the switch on the transponder to the appropriate setting (1, 2, 3+). As the vehicle enters the Metro ExpressLanes, an antenna reads the transponder. Sign up today for FasTrak. > Online at metroexpresslones. net > By phone at 511 (say "ExpressLanes" and follow prompts) > In person at walk-in centers (Soo W lgoth St, Gardena 9024.8 and 3501 Santa Anita Ave, EI Monte 91731) > By mail at PO Box 3878, Gardena 90247 > Automobile Club members receive a one-time 20% discount at any AAA branch location in Southern California You can also sign up for FasTrak with "Mel," the ExpressLanes van. Find out where at twitter. coml&Lones Van. Solo drivers save time in the ExpressLanes. For the first time, solo drivers with FasTrak' can choose to save time by accessing the ExpressLanes as a toll -paying customer for an average travel speed of at least 45 miles per hour. Solo drivers move faster in all lanes. By redistributing vehicles across all lanes of the freeway, the ExpressLanes will make traffic flow more freely, creating more reliable travel times for everyone on the freeway. Carpools and motorcycles reap rewards twice. Eligible carpools and motorcyclists can use ExpressLanes toll-free with a FasTrak transponder. And these groups are automatically enrolled in the Carpool Loyalty Program with a chance to win free gas cards each month that they use Metro ExpressLanes. Carpools have more choices than ever. The iio ExpressLanes add smart new lanes at Adams Boulevard for better traffic flow. The io ExpressLanes add nine new lane miles between the 605 and 710 freeways to improve travel times. Two -person carpools — who currently cannot access the 10 San Bernardino Freeway carpool lanes during peak hour (Mon -Fri Sam -gam, 4pm-7Pm) —will now have the choice to use ExpressLanes for a toll. Guaranteed access, anytime. Eligible carpools and motorcyclists will always have access to the ExpressLanes. Only solo drivers will be prevented entry if the average speed in the ExpressLanes falls below 45 mph for more than 10 minutes. These temporary restrictions on solo drivers will help keep traffic moving by regulating the number of vehicles in the ExpressLanes. For more information on how to join a carpool, visit ridematch.info. Metro Vanpools reap rewards twice. Vanpools will continue to share the ride on the ExpressLanes toll-free. And with our new loyalty program, vanpool drivers can now qualify for drawings to win free gas cards each month they use these lanes. They also can benefit from Metro's van lease subsidy. Metro Vanpools mean less congestion. Metro ExpressLanes is adding ioo new vanpools to the ExpressLanes routes along the 110 and io, to improve traffic flow and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For more information on how to join a vanpool, visit commutesmart.info. Transit riders receive fast, frequent service. Riders on select transit lines along the ExpressLanes corridors will enjoy more frequent service. Metro's Silver Line service has improved frequency — every 10 minutes during rush hour on the 110 Harbor Transitway. As a result, ridership is up more than 6o% on this line. (That's a lot less cars on the road to slow everyone down.) We've also purchased 59 brand new clean -fuel buses for the Metro Silver Line, Foothill Silver Streak, Foothill Route 699, Torrance Transit Line 4, and Gardena Municipal Bus Line 1X. More seats, less pollution! Transit riders will enjoy newer, safer stations. The Metro ExpressLanes project includes new lighting and security at Harbor Transitway stations, construction of the just -opened EI Monte Station, expansion of the Pomona Metrolink Station and creation of new station at Patsaouras Plaza. In addition, you'll find new bus stops at the Manchester and Slauson Stations and a new noise barrier at the 37th Street Station on the 110 freeway. Transit riders reap rewards for sharing the ride. Frequent transit riders on eligible transit routes* earn toll credits that can be applied to their FasTrak account. Every 32 one-way trips during peak hours earn a $5 toll credit, applied directly to the customer's FasTrak account. And just four one-way transit trips on these routes during the month waive the FasTrak account maintenance fee. *On the i1o: Metro Lines 450, 55o and Metro Silver Line Gardena Line 1X Torrance Line 4 LADOT Commuter Express 438 and 448 On the io: Metro Lines 485, 487. 489 and Metro Silver Line Foothill Lines 481, 493, 497, 498, 499, 699 and Foothill Silver Streak metroexpress lanes. net 3 can use the ExpressLanes toll free with a FasTrak" transponder. How ft%o-rks The iio and io Metro ExpressLanes regulations will be enforced by the California Highway Patrol using visual and electronic means. FosTrok transponders are portable and can be moved from one vehicle to another. The FasTrok can also be used on any toll facility in California. And if you already have a FasTrak transponder issued by another toll facility, it will work to pay a toll on the Metro ExpressLanes as well. 4 metroexpressl anes. net Prior to starting your trip, you will indicate the number of occupants in your vehicle by moving the switch on the transponder to the appropriate setting (1, 2, 3+). METRO EXPRESSLANES © Metro A r . FASTW sm W.- d,,—, The iio and io Metro ExpressLanes will operate 24/7 and will be separated from the general purpose lanes by double solid white lines. The first sign will be a FasTrak ONLY ExpressLanes sign approximately 1/2 mile away from the entrance to signify the distance remaining to enter the ExpressLanes. Entry to and exit from the ExpressLanes will be indicated by a single dashed white line. Tolls on the ExpressLanes are based on the current congestion level and the length of your trip. Approximately % mile away from the entrance to the ExpressLanes, the second overhead electronic sign displays two toll amounts: 1) The current toll from this entrance to the next major exit; and 2) The current toll from this entrance to the end of the ExpressLanes. on the no and io with a FasTrak' transponder can choose to pay a toll to use the ExpressLanes. The third sign indicates the entry point to the ExpressLanes and informs drivers that FasTrak is required to use the ExpressLanes. The fourth sign marks the start of the ExpressLanes toll segment and is the final reminder to the driver that FasTrak is required beyond this point. Once you are beyond the ExpressLanes entry/exit point, where the dashed white line ends and the double solid white lines begin again, an overhead antenna will read the FasTrak transponder and, for solo drivers who choose to use the ExpressLanes, the correct toll amount will be automatically deducted from your FasTrak account based upon the toll amounts displayed to you on the second sign. Once a motorist enters at that point, his or her toll amount will not change. If a motorist exits in-between entry points displayed on the signage, the toll amount charged to the account will be in-between the two displayed rates. Those vehicles that are carpooling and meet the minimum occupancy requirements will not have a toll deducted from their account. NORTH HOLLYWOOD SHERMAN OAKS VALLEY TOLUCA LAKE ® VILLAGE STUDIO CITY UNIVERSAL CITY ® GLENDALE EAGLEROCK E HLDRI. MONROVIA MaC nchestenturyrBly & l Gage Av, Slauson Av, aELL BELL Vernon Av GARDENS Imperial Hwy & El Segundo Bl ATWATER PASADENA SAN Rosecrans Av & 1-105, available exit point on 1-105. VILLAGE GLASSELL PARK Redondo Beach Bl ' "l MARINn ARCADIn DUARTE LOS FELTZ MOUNT HIGHLAND V SAN Rosecrans Av & ® A A SR -91 WASHINGTON PARK ExpressLanes GABRILI Harbor Gateway ExpressLanes End HOLLYWOOD SILVER SOUTH Rosemead ExpressLanes End Transit Center LAKE © © PASADENA Del TORRANCE 707 Walnut a Entrance and Exit i.A,FwA� N California State University, 1-710 Avr Grove Av ,,_,, P Ex ressLanes start ROS - VEL HANCOCK PARK Exit Only Los Angele -AC-USC aALHAMBRA EL MONTE ExpressLanes US -101 Westbound and Southbound Union Medicalstatioq CenterAlameda �ic St � AtlBl, Del Baldwin Av, KOREATOWN ExpressLanes End Garfield Av, Mar Santa Anita, 1-605 ExpressLanes End DOWNTOWN ® Alameda St New Av Av Peck Rd LOS ANGEL[ EL MONTE Flower St ExpressLanes Start ExpressLanes Start Adams Bl, m Univenit ® , Figueroa St WEST ADAMS o Y f Southern Cohifordja ExpressLanes End EAST brthopaedu LOSANF,FLES MONTEBELLO PALMS IIYY'' Hospital Jefferson Bl f> In CRENSHAW Q 39th St, Coliseum © COMMERCE @'HIITIER MaC nchestenturyrBly & l Gage Av, Slauson Av, aELL BELL Vernon Av GARDENS Imperial Hwy & El Segundo Bl S. :gg M. I I 1 - NOTE: Solo drivers connecting directly from 110 ExpressLanes Rosecrans Av & 1-105, available exit point on 1-105. Redondo Beach Bl ' "l = 1 Imperial Hwy Crenshaw, Prairie � N Northbound 1-110 & Century Bl & Hawthorne ExpressLanes End D V Rosecrans Av & ® A A SR -91 El Segundo Bl ExpressLanes Long Beach Bl Harbor Gateway ExpressLanes End 7Yansit Center 182nd St > Harbor Gateway Q ExpressLanes End Transit Center ExpressLanes Start TORRANCE a Entrance and Exit i.A,FwA� N aEntrance Only a Exit Only Northbound and Eastbound ExpressLanes Westbound and Southbound ExpressLanes S. :gg M. I I 1 - NOTE: Solo drivers connecting directly from 110 ExpressLanes to 1-105 must exit at the first available exit point on 1-105. Crenshaw, Prairie � N Northbound 1-110 EzpressLanes & Hawthorne ExpressLanes End D V ® A A Northbound 1-110 Wilmington & ExpressLanes Long Beach Bl ExpressLanes End CERRITOS HAWAIIAN GARDENS FasTrak transponder will be required for Metro ExpressLanes entry. The general purpose lanes are not charged a toll. H WEST COVINA k, U > An existing FasTrake can be used, but will be charged the single occupancy toll. > Prior to starting your trip, set switchable FasTrak to indicate the number of people in your vehicle. > Avoid a citation; don't cross the double solid white lines. > Tolls range from 25 cents to $1.40 per mile. > Toll amount is locked in at the moment you enter the ExpressLanes. > Motorcycles should always set FasTrak to "3." > ExpressLanes Equity Plan customers can open a FasTrak account at a reduced rate. > AAA members get a 2o% discount at any AAA branch location in Southern California or when signing up online at AAA.com/metroexpress/ones for FasTrak. > Frequent transit riders earn toll credits with TAP. > Four one-way trips per month waive the $3 monthly account fee. > FasTrak can be used on all toll roads in California. For details, visit metroexpresslanes.net. 6 metroexpress lanes. net The goal is to keep traffic moving at an average minimum speed of 45 mph in the Metro ExpressLanes. The minimum toll per mile is 25 cents; the maximum is $1.40. The average toll should range between $4 and $7. Sensors are deployed that measure congestion and adjust the tolls as the number of vehicles in the lanes increase. The more traffic in the ExpressLanes, the higher the toll amount. The less traffic in the ExpressLanes, the lower the toll amount. However, the toll amount is locked in once a vehicle is in the ExpressLanes. If speeds fall below 45 mph for more than ten minutes, the ExpressLanes signs alert solo drivers not to enter the ExpressLanes until speeds climb back to 45 mph or faster. However, a solo driver already with a trip in progress in the ExpressLanes is allowed to complete their trip. This helps ensure smoother flowing traffic in the ExpressLanes for all who use them. If a Sig -Alert occurs and the toll payer was not able to travel at the minimum average speed of 45 mph, the customer's FasTrak account is automatically credited the toll by the next business day. In the case of a traffic incident in or near the ExpressLanes, toll amount signs may change the message displayed to one of the following: HOV Only — ExpressLanes restricted to carpools to safely divert traffic around a blockage in the roadway up ahead or to allow traffic speeds to climb up above 45 miles per hour. Open to All — ExpressLanes open to all vehicles, including those without a FasTrak. Message is displayed to safely divert traffic around a blockage in one or more of the general purpose lanes. Net toll revenues will be reinvested into transit and other transportation improvements in the corridors where they are generated. ............ Frequently Asked Questions About the Metro ExpressLanes Program Where do I get FasTraV? Customers will be able to establish their Metro ExpressLanes pre -paid FasTrak account online at metroexpresslones.net; by calling 511 and saying "ExpressLanes;" by mail at P.O. Box 3878, Gardena, CA 90247; in person at our designated walk-in centers: 500 W igoth St, Gardena, and 3501 Santa Anita Ave, EI Monte; or in person at any AAA branch office in Southern California. What does it cost to set up a pre -paid FasTrak account? Credit/Debit Card Accounts: An initial pre -paid toll deposit of $40 per transponder is required to open an account. The $25 transponder deposit is waived. If the transponder is not returned in good working condition when the account is closed, a $25 fee will be charged to the account. Cash/Check Accounts: An initial pre -paid toll deposit Of $50 per transponder and a deposit of $25 per transponder is required to open an account. When the account is closed and the transponder is returned in good working condition, the $25 deposit is returned to the customer. For those commuters who qualify for the Equity Plan, a one-time $25 discount will be applied to their account. Enrollment in the Equity Plan can only occur in person at our designated walk-in centers or by mail. For AAA members, there is a 20% one-time discount if you sign up through AAA. How will the system distinguish between carpools and solo drivers in charging tolls? Prior to starting a trip, the driver will indicate the number of occupants in the vehicle by moving the switch on the transponder to the appropriate setting (1, 2, 3+). The switchable FasTrak transponder will help enforce occupancy requirements aided by dedicated CHP officers who will provide visual verification. What are the carpool requirements for toll-free travel on the ExpressLanes? All vehicles traveling on the Metro ExpressLanes must have a FasTrak transponder. The tto and 10 have different occupancy requirements today, which will not change for the ExpressLanes. On the 110, vehicles with two or more occupants will travel toll-free at all hours. On the to, vehicles with three or more occupants will be able to use Metro ExpressLanes toll-free at all hours. Vehicles with two occupants (on the io ExpressLanes only) will pay a toll during peak hours Monday through Friday (5 am -9 am; 4 pm -7 pm), but will have toll-free use during off-peak hours and on weekends. Are there any monthly fees associated with having a FasTrak account? Yes. A $3 monthly account maintenance fee is assessed. The fee can be waived with a minimum of four one-way trips on the Metro ExpressLanes in a month. The one-way trips can be any combination of paying a toll, carpooling toll-free, or eligible transit trips. The fee is automatically waived for customers enrolled in the Equity Plan. NOTE: The fee will not begin until AFTER the 10 ExpressLanes open early next year. I have an account with another toll agency. Can I use my FasTrak transponder on the Metro ExpressLanes? Yes, your existing FasTrak transponder will work on the Metro ExpressLanes. You will be charged the single occupancy rate. If you would like to use the ExpressLanes as a carpooler and not be charged, you will need to obtain a Metro FasTrak transponder. You are not required to maintain two separate accounts. The Metro transponder will work on all toll facilities in California. I drive a CNG/Electric/Zero Emission vehicle. Do I have to pay a toll? Will I need FasTrak? Yes, all vehicles will need a FasTrak to use the ExpressLanes. These vehicles will be charged a toll similar to all other solo drivers until March 1, 2014, at which time, these vehicles will not be charged a toll. I drive a motorcycle. Will I need FasTrak? Do I have to pay a toll? Yes, motorcycles do need to have FasTrak but do not have to pay a toll. The FasTrak should always be set to 3+. The FasTrak can be placed in a secure location on the motorcycle such as a bag or purse. For more FAQs, go to metroexpresslones.net. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and Caltrans District 7, along with Foothill Transit Agency, Gardena Municipal Bus Lines, Los Angeles Department of Transportation, Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink) and Torrance Transit are partnering in the Metro ExpressLanes. The Metro ExpressLanes Demonstration Program is primarily funded with a $210 million congestion reduction demonstration grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation. Metro has held more than 300 community outreach meetings about the project, including eight public hearings. The success of the Congestion Reduction Project will be measured and reported to the state legislature and federal government. Performance measurements will include: > Reduced travel times (maintaining free-flowing traffic at average speeds Of 45 mph or faster) > Decrease in air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions > Increased use of transit, vanpools and carpools > Improved access to all travel choices, regardless of income Success will be measured over the course of the year. Commuters will need time to learn how to take advantage of all of Metro ExpressLanes transportation options. Continuing education and operational changes, as appropriate, will help ensure the project meets its objectives and that travel times will improve on the 110 and 10 freeways. metroexpi Metro ExpressLanes is an exciting new endeavor. But like all new ideas, it will take some time for drivers to become familiar with how it works. And over time we will experience the full benefits and rewards of this new traffic flow improvement project. Your participation and on-going feedback as a vital partner in this program will ensure its success — as well as an improved travel experience for all drivers traveling on the 110 and 10 freeways to downtown Los Angeles. This Signature Program is distinguished by: > First Express Lanes in Los Angeles County > First in California with Carpool Loyalty Program > First in California with FasTrak transponder occupancy switch > First in California on congested corridors > First in US to link transit use with Toll Credits > First in US with Equity Plan > One of six nationwide Federal Highway Administration demonstration projects ONLINE Sign up online at metroexpresslanes. net OICE Call 511. Say "ExpressLanes." Outside of LA, Orange or Ventura Counties, call877.224.6511 WALK-IN CENTERS Soo W 19oth St Gardena, CA 90248 3501 Santa Anita Av EI Monte, CA 91731 Hours of Operation: Monday through Friday 8am-6pm; Saturday gam -fpm MAIL Download your application at metroexpresslones.net, complete and mail to: Metro ExpressLanes PO Box 3878 Gardena, CA 90247 IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Members receive a 2o% discount FACEBOOK facebook.com/express/anes '/_ _J, ,M Uri EMEEM Tips and Savings IL > An existing FasTrak can be used, but will be charged the single occupancy toll. > Prior to starting your trip, set switchable FasTrak to indicate the number of people in your vehicle. > Avoid a citation; don't cross the double solid white lines. > Tolls range from 25 cents to $1.40 per mile. > Toll amount is locked in at the _momentyou enter the Ex_RressLanes. _ > Motorcycles should always set FasTrak to "3." > ExpressLanes Equity Plan customers can open a FasTrak account at a reduced rate. > AAA members get a zo% discount at any AAA branch location in Southern California or when signing up online at AAA.com/metroexpress/anes for FasTrak. > Frequent transit riders can earn toll credits with TAP. > Four one-way trips per month waive the $3 monthly account fee. > FasTrak can be used on all toll roads in California. METRO ExPRajjV Es With Over 25 FasTrak® Entry and Exit Locations 1-105/1-110 HOV Connector SEEINSET FOR DETAILS -- . _As Sign up now for a FasTrak Account Get FasTrak at AAA and save 20% or visit Albertsons or select Costco stores and save io% For details, visit metro exp resslanes. net. Follow us: VA110=1"I121k, f r - ■Niece ai E 0 LA > CU > a 0 ( " +' y o U ca W` '.p QJ 4A U 4- C U 0 v 3 �+ v v v ai E 0 AF,as7iuJ EXPRESS LANES 7-1 It's about choice. qlas Solo drivers With new access to the ExpressLanes, solo drivers can now beat the traffic and save time by choosing to use the ExpressLanes as a toll -paying customer. It's about rewarding yourself. 44 Carpoolers Eligible carpools travel the ExpressLanes toll-free and are automatically enrolled in the Loyalty Program to earn gift card rewards. METRO EXPR How It Works 1 2 LANES It's about sharing the ride. Metro Vanpools Vanpools continue to share the ride on the ExpressLanes toll-free, earn gift card rewards through the Loyalty Program, and benefit from a van lease subsidy, It's about more transit service. RTL Transit Riders Riders on select transit lines' along the ExpressLanes corridors enjoy more frequent service. That means getting where you need to go faster. Plus, with the Transit Rewards program, you can earn ExpressLanes toll credits for riding. Metro, Gardena Municipal Bus, Foothill Transit, Torrance Transit and more LI wqkRANCHO PALOS VERDES TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2013 SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA** Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material presented for tonight's meeting: Item No. Description of Material Mayor's Announcements Email exchange between Staff and City Council City Manager Report Email exchange between Councilman Campbell and City Manager Lehr 2 Email exchange between Mayor Pro Tem Duhovic and Ronald Conrow Respectfully submitted, Carla Morreale ** PLEASE NOTE: Materials attached after the color page(s) were submitted through Monday, February 4, 2013**. W:\AGENDA\2013 Additions Revisions to agandas\20130205 additions revisions to agenda.doc Subject: FW: FW: Clean Water Funding Initiative - Update Attachments: Clean Water Clean Beaches Fee.pdf From: Kit Fox Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1:23 PM To: Susan Brooks Cc: Susan Brooks <Subrooks08()gmail.com>; Susan Brooks; Carolyn Lehr; Carla Morreale Subject: RE: FW: Clean Water Funding Initiative - Update Dear Mayor Brooks: I've put together the attached slide regarding the County's proposed "Clean Water" fee. After speaking with Carolyn earlier, this has been added to the Mayor's Announcements on tonight's agenda (rather than after the "Clearwater" item under Border Issues, which is not related to this proposed County fee). Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kit Fox, AICP Senior Administrative Analijst Citta Manager's Office Citta of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 544-5226 E (310) 544-5291 E kitfQQ4 com From: Carolyn Lehr Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 9:51 AM To: Susan Brooks <Subrooks08(5)gmail.com> Cc: Kit Fox Subject: RE: FW: Clean Water Funding Initiative - Update Kit, would you please make a slide of the key information—contact info, date extension—so we can show it after the Clearwater presentation tonight? The Mayor will make a few remarks about the public's opportunity to participate in the issue. Thanks CL From: Mayor Susan Brooks [mailto:subrooks08@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 8:43 AM To: Carolyn Lehr Subject: Re: FW: Clean Water Funding Initiative - Update Carolyn, r/V VD/Z /& We should put this info on the website and make a note of it at tonite's meeting. Perhaps someone can get the web and phone info on a power point while we cover the time extension. On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Carolyn Lehr <clehrkrpv.com> wrote: Council Members, I am passing this along to you, as I was not sure whether the County sent this memo also to Council Members. Thanks, Carolyn From: Manning, Pamela [mailto:PMANNING@dpw.lacounty.gov] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 1:55 PM To: Manning, Pamela Subject: Clean Water Funding Initiative - Update South Bay City Managers; By now you have become aware of the results of the Board of Supervisors Public hearing on the Measure. Below is an update and invitation for comments. Board Continues Public Hearing to March 12, 2013. Protests via Email Accepted. Public Hearing Continued The Board of Supervisors held a public hearing for the Clean Water, Clean Beaches Measure on January 15. During the hearing, testimony was heard from approximately 190 individuals and representatives of government agencies, businesses, environmental organizations, schools, and other groups. As of January 11, approximately 95,000 protests have been received (representing about 4.3% of property owners). The Board passed a motion extending the public hearing to March 12, 2013. The Board further directed at its January 29 meeting that property owners be allowed to submit protests via email. If a protest was previously submitted by mail or hand -delivered, there is no need to resubmit via email. Only one protest will be counted for each parcel. To be counted, protests must be received by the end of the public hearing period on March 12 and include the parcel's site address, Assessor's Parcel Number, the name of the parcel owner, as well as the signature of the parcel owner or an authorized representative. Parcel owners may use the protest form provided at www.LACountyCleanWater.org or submit a letter and email it to WQFI.lnfo@dpw.lacounty.gov. Only scanned or photographed email protests with a handwritten signature will be accepted. For more information on how to submit a protest please visit www.LACountyCleanWater.org. Revised Program Documents Available for Public Comment M In addition to continuing the public hearing, the Board directed the LA County Department of Public Works to finalize the program's governance documents and submit them at the March 12 public hearing. Accordingly, Public Works updated the draft governance documents based on feedback provided by stakeholders. These documents are now available for public comment at www.LACountVCleanWater.org. Comments on the updated draft program documents are encouraged and appreciated. Please email comments to WQFI.INFO@dpw.lacounty.gov by Friday, February 15. Public Works will review all comments and make edits as appropriate in preparation for the submission of the final program documents to the Board on March 12. For more information on the Measure, visit www;LACountyCleanWater.org, call (800) 218-0018, or follow us on Twitter at @LACleanWater. Para informacion en Espanol, por favor, visite www.LACountyCleanWater.org o Ilame 626 458- 6981. Sincerely, Clean Water, Clean Beaches Measure Team Los Angeles County,Flood Control District Best Regards, Pamela Manning, Business Relations City Services/South Bay Cities & Marina del Rey Los Angles County DPW 626-390-2874 Follow us on Twitter @LAPublicWorks,@LACoGoModal Website: http://dpw.lacounty.gov Susan Brooks, Mayor Rancho Palos Verdes, CA From: Carolyn Lehr Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 12:11 PM To: Brian Campbell <b.camp@cox.net> Cc: CC Subject: Requested info on City Anniversary http://www.palosverdes.com/rpv/citycouncil/agenda videos/disyplay/index.cfm?id=247 Hi Brian, Here is the link to the November 7 initial report to the Council re: 40th Anniversary commemoration hope this helps. Per your inquiry, in looking at the budget for the event, the City Council approved $17,000 in the current fiscal year, and Kathryn is allowing the remaining $23,000 in next years' budget, for a total of $40,000. We anticipated splitting the budget in this way because we normally have the event in the fall, which takes us into the next years' budget. However, after looking at the calendar, we determined that May was a better timeframe for the "gala" event. Therefore, we may need to bring the entire budget request into this current year, by way of the usual year-end adjustment that Finance will prepare for Council approval. The amount estimated for the budget is in line with anniversary events in the past, but of course the Council can direct staff to make whatever adjustments to the budget it wishes. I am copying the entire Council on this email, in case others may wish to view the November 7 presentation to the Council on this topic. Please do not Reply All. Thanks, Carolyn C IT`( To: Carolyn Lehr Subject: FW: 40th Anniversary party From: Brian Campbell [mailto:b.camp(dcox.net] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 9:45 PM To: Carolyn Lehr Subject: RE: 40th Anniversary party And, specifically how much the party budget was that you said at breakfast was approved by the City Council. Thanks, Brian -------- Original message -------- From: Carolyn Lehr <clehr@,Mv.com> Date: To: 'Brian Campbell <b.cam_p�cni cox.net>" <b.camp(a),cox.net> Subject: RE: 40th Anniversary party Ok, I will look it up and let you know the exact tape location. Thanks, Carolyn From: RPV Councilman B Campbell [mailto:b.campgcox.net] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013-12:21 PM To: Carolyn Lehr Subject: 40th Anniversary party Carolyn, In advance of your update on this topic tomorrow night, can you direct us to the council meeting you stated whereby we discussed this party and the associated start time on the video? I think an event is a great idea but this opportunity for a video update would allow the council to be more effective. Thanks, Brian Brian Campbell Councilman City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 310-544-7400 cell + text 424-255-8887 office 888-855-9619 fax W] "Reply" to sign up for my Email Newsletter .....dam. RPV Website: www.palosverdes.com/rpv Twitter: http://twitter.com/CMbellforRPV Notice: The information contained in this electronic e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential/or privileged. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the original message and all copies from your system. Thank you. Subject: FW: Copy of Insurance Attachments: RPV Request for Insurance.pdf From: Jerry Duhovic [mailto:councilmanduhovic@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 11:21 PM To: ronald.conrow@plainsmidstream.com Cc: CC; rudy@svorinich.com; john.larson@lacity.org Subject: RE: Copy of Insurance Dear Mr. Conrow, Thank you for your email. Your recollection appears to differ from mine. To ensure my recollection was accurate, I went back and reviewed the tape of the meeting. If you are interested in viewing it for yourself, you can go to the City Council videos section on the RPV website and select the October 16, 2012 meeting. You can also go directly to the 2:22:45 mark in the video to review our conversation. As to the statement in your email, "As I recollect from the October 16, 2012 RPV Council Meeting there was no promise on my behalf to provide insurance documentation to RPV." For the record, in direct response to my question about you providing us the details of the insured loss categories and the policy limits for your parent company's policy that covers Rancho, your response was "If you want it, that can go through the City Attorney and we can get you that information, under attorney/client privilege." I then asked if we could get a copy of the policy. Your response was "Not a problem." You didn't use the word promise, but I think one could reasonably infer from your answers that you had the authority as the corporate representative to provide the requested information and that we would in fact receive said information. Additionally, as to the statement in your email, "However, I did clearly state that any such request would have to be made to Plains legal by RPV legal as I am not authorized to provide Company proprietary information.", I was unable to find that in our exchange. As for a litmus test for posting emails, letters and other information, there is no such test for commentary sent to the Council. I am pleased that you are fully engaged with Councilman Buscaino's office and that of the LA City Attorney. I would hope that you will continue to engage the elected representative's in RPV. I must tell you, speaking only for myself and not the City Council as a whole, I am dismayed at our inability to get the requested information. I look forward to a continued dialogue with you whereby we may ultimately be able to get the answers to our questions. I appreciate your offer to tour the Rancho facility. I will take you up on that in the not too distant future. Regards, 10 Jerry City Council Colleagues - You were cc'd as an. FYI. Please do not reply to me directly or. hit .reply all. Jerry V. Duhovic Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor Pro Tem jerty.duhovic@rlpv.com City Hall: (310)544-5207 Cell:(310)502-8036 From: Ronald. Conrow&plainsmidstream.com To: councilmanduhovic a,hotmail.com CC: rudyna,svorinich.com; john.larson(21acityorg Subject: RE: Copy of Insurance Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 00:01:36 +0000 Dear Mayor Pro Tem Duhovic, As I recollect from the October 16, 2012 RPV Council Meeting there was no promise on my behalf to provide insurance documentation to RPV. However, I did clearly state that any such request would have to be made to Plains legal by RPV legal as I am not authorized to provide Company proprietary information. Attached is the letter from John Kyles, Plains Senior Attorney to Carolyn Lynch of Richards, Watson, & Gershon representing RPV. With respect I see Rancho is on the Agenda under Border Issues for the RPV Council Meeting on 02/05. In reviewing the e-mails and documentation I am wondering if there is any "litmus test" for posting e-mails and rhetoric which have no documented or applicable regulatory standards to back up the numerous allegations? I know that RPV has been provided information from the LA City Attorney, State Attorney General, and EPS third party consultant which clearly refutes most of these claims such as Rancho being an "ultra hazardous facility, non-compliant original EIR and CEQA, unannounced multi -agency task force inspection with no NOV's, technical analysis of Facility Risk, and no basis for injunctive relief based upon known facts. Since Plains acquired the Rancho Gaffey Street Facility in November 2008, we have endeavored to be a good neighbor and member of the community. He held numerous meetings with neighborhood councils, agencies, and elected official, as well as extending an invitation to Mr. Kit Fox of RPV. It is puzzling to me that in light of information presented by Ms. Jean Lacombe at the October 16, 2012 meeting which see introduced a flyer showing another facility with similar refrigerated tanks as Rancho's having a "blast radius" extending far into both RPV and Rolling Hills that the RPV Council is not concerned about other tanks if the issue is clearly about "public safety". Rancho's Risk Management Plan (RPM) "worst case" scenario is on file at LAFD/COPA for public review and clearly shows our blast radius to be about 4 % times less. Also, you may contact Mary Wesling of the EPA to confirm the accuracy of the "worst case" scenario submitted in accordance with the parameters of 40CFR68. Finally, be aware that I am fully engaged with Councilman Buscaino's staff and the LA City Attorney's office with regards to providing any requested non-proprietary information concerning Rancho. All our information is supported by applicable regulations and standards regarding our Facility. Councilwoman (Mayor Brooks) is scheduled to tour the Rancho Facility on February 14 at 1:00pm. Rancho extends invitation for you to tour our Facility and see for yourself. D Regards, Western District Manager Plains LPC Services, LP Shafter, CA Office: 661-368-7917 Mobile: 661-319-9978 Fax: 661-746-4037 Ronald. Con row(ftfainsmidstream.corn From: Jerry Duhovic[mai Ito :councilmanduhovic(&hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 3:04 PM To: Ronald Conrow Subject: Copy of Insurance Mr. Conrow, I am inquiring as to the status of the insurance documentation that you promised to provide to the Council several months ago. Please advise as to when we should expect the documentation. Regards, Jerry Jerry V. Duhovic Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor Pro Tem jerry.duhovic*rpv.com City Hall:(310)544-5207 Cell: (310)502-8036 0 LI oRk" RANCHO PALOS VERDES TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 2013 SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material received through Monday afternoon for the Tuesday, February 5, 2013 City Council meeting: Item No. Description of Material 1 Email exchange between Mayor Brooks and Barry Hildebrand 2 Staff Memorandum; Emails from: Eva Cicoria; Janet Gunter; Jan Perry; lesha Wadala Respectfully submitted, ,1 Carla Morreale W:\AGENDA\2013 Additions Revisions to agendas�20130204 additions revisions to agenda through Monday afternoon.doc Subject: FW: Traffic Safety Commission Appointment From: Mayor Susan Brooks [mailto:subrooks08(&gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:33 PM To: Barry Hildebrand Cc: CC Subject: Fwd: Traffic Safety Commission Appointment Thank you for your correspondence, Barry. Just a quick note to state that we are grateful for your commitment to our community and that of everyone who volunteers their service to our city. As you know, committee and commission members serve for set terms; some are appointed to a vacated or unexpired term. We have many applicants for a limited number of positions. Some re -apply for every position available; it takes perseverance, diligence and sometimes a year or more to obtain a slot. Some new city councils (including previous RPV Councils) reorganize all their appointments at once. However, this Council is working according to the regular "term" process. Applicants coming before Council for committee appointment, do so according to a set calendar. There is a plethora of new talent eager to serve our City. Likewise, there are many seasoned individuals whose expertise is valued, as well. These are challenges that the Council as a whole must address. The Council is scheduled to consider some of the appointments at upcoming duly noticed Council meetings. Best Regards, Susan Susan Brooks, Mayor Rancho Palos Verdes, CA On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:18 PM, <bihilde a,aol.com> wrote: Dear Council, I, like you, are probably hearing rumors (maybe more than rumors with you) that the chair (Joe Locascio) of the Traffic Safety Commission (TSC) is being targeted for dismissal from his position on the TSC (and his chairmanship) for nothing more than political control of that Commission. It is just about a moon ago when the chair of the city's Finance Advisory Committee was similarity eliminated from that Committee and replaced by a novice in city affairs. This sort of practice will eventually decimate the pool of qualified citizens who might consider serving on a volunteer Commission/committee as a way to save scarce city funds and feel good about helping his/her city for the betterment of all 46,000 of us. Thus, I urge all of you to consider the negative impact you will have if Mr Locascio if drummed off the TSC next Tuesday night. He has been, and is, a dedicated,well-qualified, no-nonsense member of that committee and a respected leader, so please _give him your support. I can relate directly to this issue, having been axed by your predecessors after devoting 8 years of time to the city. sV, CA f e t 310-377-0051 1. MEMORANDUM IR RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: KIT FOX, AICP, SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2013 SUBJECT: LATE CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE RANCHO LPG BUTANE STORAGE FACILITY (BORDER ISSUES STATUS REPORT — AGENDA ITEM `2') Rancho LPG Butane Storage Facility, Los Angeles (San Pedro) Shortly after the completion of tonight's Border Issues Status Report, Staff received the attached letter from the legal counsel for Rancho LPG. The letter responds to the City Attorney's request to obtain information about insurance and liability coverage for the Rancho LPG facility, under the direction given by the City Council in October 2012. The letter states that: "[after] internal review, Rancho LPG has concluded that the requested information is proprietary. Therefore Rancho will not make the insurance policies and their details available to the City." The letter then goes on to state that: "Rancho LPG wants Rancho Palos Verdes City government to know that Rancho works closely with its underwriters and has been advised that Rancho has the appropriate level of insurance for a facility of this type." Staff will continue to monitor this project in future Border Issues reports. Attachment • Letter from Rancho LPG Holdings, LLC (dated 1/29/13) MABorder Issues\Staff Reports\20130205_CC_LateCorrespondence.docx 0 a. FANCUO LPG Holdings LLC John H. Kyles Senior Attorney January 29, 2013 Carol W. Lynch, Esq. City Attorney, City of Rancho Palos Verdes c/o: Richards, Watson & Gershon 355 South Grand Avenue 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Phone: (713) 993-5136 Fax: (713) 646-4216 RE: Rancho LPG Holdings LLC San Pedro Terminal, 2110 North Gaffey, San Pedro, CA City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA Information Request Response (Plains File: L6686A) Dear Ms. Lynch, You and Mr. Kit Fox have inquired about the insurance coverage that Rancho LPG has in place in case of a catastrophic event involving the storage tanks at Rancho's facility. After internal review, Rancho LPG has concluded that the requested information is proprietary. Therefore, Rancho will not make the insurance policies and their details available to the City. However, Rancho LPG wants Rancho Palos Verdes City government to know that Rancho works closely with its underwriters and has been advised that Rancho has an appropriate level of insurance for a facility of this type. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, ohn . Kyles c: Kit Fox, AICP Senior Admin Analyst City Manager's Office City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho, Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Ron Conrow Western District Manager Plains LPG Services, LP Shafter, CA PAA: LAW COM: 6502040 Dan Johansen San Pedro Terminal 2110 North Gaffey, San Pedro, CA 90731 Scott Sill Managing Director, LPG Operations 1400, 607-8 Avenue SW Calgary AB T2POA7 Hon. Rudy Svorinich, Jr. 1891 N. Gaffey Street Suite 221 San Pedro, CA 90731 U From: Kit Fox Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:24 AM To: Teresa Takaoka Subject: FW: Border Issues and Ponte Vista Late Correspondence on Agenda Item 2 (Border Issues Status Report) Kit Fox, A.tcP Senior Administrative Analyst City Mana6er's Office Citi, of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940Hawthorne Blvd, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 54.4.5226 F. (.310) 5445291 E: kitfgMv.com From: Eva Cicoria [ma iIto: cicoriae@aol.com] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:14 AM To: Kit Fox Subject: Border Issues and Ponte Vista Hi Kit, I was glad to see the City's comment letter on the Ponte Vista Draft EIR. You made some very good points. One thing I didn't see, though, is mention of the impact that high density development, and the traffic that flows from it, is likely to have on Palos Verdes Drive East. I noticed an increase in traffic on PVDE when work was being done on Western Ave. not too long ago. As the stretch of Western that traverses the commercial area through RPV and SP becomes increasingly congested, I think it is likely that more and more drivers will access the southeast section of San Pedro by taking Narbonne from PCH, drivng along PVDE to Miraleste Dr., then turning onto Western either at 1 st or 9th. As you are probably aware, PVDE already has issues --safety concerns related to drivers speeding around curves and ingress/egress issues related to private drives along the road. Just something else to keep in mind. Thank you. Eva Cicoria These photos were taken very early Wednesday morning as an associate was on their way to the airport and I just received them tonight. Perhaps, Mary ... the street maintenance that we reported on and that you inquired to Rancho about was not totally unrelated as they told you?? What was this? Why was it not reported?? What happened here??? Please get some answers on this if possible. Just when is our number going to be up down here? Thank you. Janet G o a From: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:44 PM To: wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov Cc: det310@juno.com; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; connie@rutter.us; chateau4us@att.net; CC; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; bonbon90731@gmail.com; paul_h_rosenberg@hotmail.com; dan.weikel@latimes.com; jacob.haik@lacity.org; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; cary@carybrazeman.com; marciesmiller@sbcglobal.net; Iljonesin33@yahoo.com; Arriane5 @aol.com; grgrysmth@aol.com; jcynthiaperry@aol.com; burlingl02@aol.com; hamilton.cloud@mai 1. house.gov; sally.magnani@doj.ca.gov Subject: Fwd: Upset at Butane storage facility ! Attachments: Apple_(10-17-10)_020.jpg; Apple_(10-17-10)_013.jpg; Apple_(10-17-10)_014.jpg; Apple_(10-17-10)_015.jpg; Apple_(10-17-10)_016.jpg; Apple_(10-17-10)_017.jpg; Apple_(10-17-10)_018.jpg; Apple_(1 0-17-1 0)_01 9.jpg These photos were taken very early Wednesday morning as an associate was on their way to the airport and I just received them tonight. Perhaps, Mary ... the street maintenance that we reported on and that you inquired to Rancho about was not totally unrelated as they told you?? What was this? Why was it not reported?? What happened here??? Please get some answers on this if possible. Just when is our number going to be up down here? Thank you. Janet G o a 0 From: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 2:04 PM To: MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; det310@juno.com; paul_h_rosenberg@hotmail.com; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; connie@rutter.us; chateau4us@att.net; CC; dan.weikel@latimes.com; amardesich@earthlink.net; jcynthiaperry@aol.com Subject: Fwd: emails from EPA & Rancho re: flare of Jan 30th scroll from bottom up ..... flare was at Rancho. -----Original Message ----- From: Wesling.Mary <Wesling.Mary@epamail.epa.gov> To: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Sent: Mon, Feb 4, 2013 1:43 pm Subject: Fw: Upset at Butane storage facility 1 Janet, In the email trail below, you'll see what we found out about the flaring event. It was at Ranch LPG, LLC. I have cc'd the LA City Fire (CUPA) and the Air District, so they have the information as well. I checked with our attorney before sending you this, since we didn't receive an official FOIA request. He feels that in this case since we are sending your other FOIA request today, that it is acceptable to send this to you also. Mary Wesling ----- Forwarded by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US on 02/04/2013 01:39 PM ----- From: Ronald Conrow <Ronald.Conrow(a)plainsmidstream.com> 10: Mary Wesli ng/R9/USEPA/US@ EPA, CC. "hani.malki(cDlacity.org" <hani.malki(c�lacity.org>, Edwin Pupka <EPupka(@agmd.gov>, Tony W Puckett <TWPuckettCa�paalp.com>, "Tommy D. Coffey Jr." <Tommy. Coffey(a�plainsmidstream.com>, Ngiabi Gicuhi <NGicuhiapaalp.com>, "Rudy Svorinich, Jr." <rudy(Qsvorinich.com>, 'Rick L Taylor' <rltaylor2apaalp.com>, Thomas J McLane <TJMcLanena.paalp.com>, Victoria Person <Victoria.Person(ar7plainsmidstream.com>, Scott Sill <Scott.Sill(a)plainsmidstream.com>, Daniel Johansen <diohansena_rancholpg.com> Date: 02/04/2013 01:01 PM Subiect: RE: FW: Upset at Butane storage facility ! Mary, This event was noted in the Operator log book as recommended by both you and the SCAQMD during your joint inspection December. I concur with making these notifications due to the activist engagement concerning Rancho. Regards, Western District Manager Plains LPG Services, LP Shafter, CA Office: 661-368-7917 Mobile: 661-319-9978 Fax: 661-746-4037 Ronald. Con row(c-)plainsmidstream.com From: Wesling.Mary@epamail.epa.gov[mailto:Wesling.Mary(a)epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 12:56 PM To: Ronald Conrow Cc: hani.malki@lacity.org; Edwin Pupka Subject: Re: FW: Upset at Butane storage facility ! U Thank you. Under Federal requirements, If there is not a release of a reportable quantity of a listed hazardous substance under either EPCRA Section 304 or CERCLA Section 103, then you're right there is not release report required to the State Emergency Response Commission (CaIEMA) or the Local Emergency Planning Committee (designated as the CUPA in California). However you need to check with the LA City Fire Department (your CUPA) to determine whether this event is reportable under California regulations. A reportable release is defined differently in California. It includes any release of any quantity that has the potential for significant harm. Please contact your CUPA. If you have any provisions in your air permit that require a report to them when you use your emergency flare that is something you'll need to talk to them about. Given the sensitivity of the community to anything that happens at this facility, it would seem to me that a practice of providing notice to the local agency when the emergency flare is used would be a good practice to provide a heads up to both the CUPA and the community. I am cc'ing the CUPA and the Air District so we all have the same information. Thanks, Mary Frorn: Ronald Conrow <Ronald. Conrow(aplainsmidstream.corn > To: Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Date: 02/04/2013 12:38 PM Subject FW: Upset at Butane storage facility ! Mary, The flaring event occurred at approximately 04:30 on 01/30/2013 and lasted approximately 10 -minutes. A transmitter on (butane) storage tank T-1 malfunctioned resulting in a pressure control valve release from the tank to the flare. The Operators responded quickly and appropriately to identify the problem, troubleshoot the controller, and repairs were made to return the tank to normal operational status. It is important to note when the control device malfunctioned it performed as designed through PHA/PSSR parameters went into a "fail safe" open position to prevent the possibility of an overpressure condition. As you know, depending on the operation pressure, flow, and level control devices are designed to respond in this manner. Depending on the operation some are designed to "fail safe" open and other are "fail safe" closed to protect the equipment and prevent a serious incident from occurring . Additionally, a new transmitter ordered and installed the next day by our Electrical & Instrumentation contractor. Another review of our permits our environmental and operations staff confirmed Rancho is not required to report a flaring event and we are not aware of any Rule requirement for LPG facilities to do so The flare is an a emergency flare and a was used for that purpose to safely control the malfunction control device. Finally, the street event on Gaffey of concern to Ms. Gunter involving numerous contractor vehicles and crews was a maintenance work on Naval Fuel Depot pipelines as reported by Rancho last week. This street work was not associated in any way with Rancho or to the flaring event! I think the Naval fuel depot could easily verify the maintenance activity on Gaffey Street. Regards, R" &WOO Western District Manager Plains LPG Services, LP Shafter, CA Office: 661-368-7917 Mobile: 661-319-9978 Fax: 661-746-4037 Ronald. Conrow(cr).plainsmidstream.com 2 From: Wesling.Mary@epamail.epa.gov[ma iIto: Wesling. Mary(d)epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 9:28 AM To: TWPuckett@paalp.com; Ronald Conrow Subject: Fw: Upset at Butane storage facility ! Importance: High Can you please tell me why you were flaring on 1/30? See photos. I'm going to need all data and documentation on this flaring event also. I assume that your attorneys will want it in a CAA 114 request. Mary ----- Forwarded by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US on 02/04/2013 09:25 AM From Janet Gunter <arriane%'Vaol.com> I o Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US@ EPA, Cc: det310Cciliuno.com, MrEnvirlawp_sbcglobal.net, connieRrutter.us, chateau4usanatt.net, cc(a)rpv.com, noelweissCcDca.rr.com, bonbon907310-gmail.com, Paul h rosenberg(a)hotmail.com, dan.weikel(a.latimes.com, iacob.haikP-Iacity.org, lisa.pinto(camail.house.gov, carr a)carybrazeman.com, marciesmilleraa.sbcglobal.net, !lionesin33Ca)vahoo.com, Arriane5(@aol.com, grgrvsmthCa)aol.com, icvnthiapern(naol.com, burling102C)a.aol.com, ham ilton.cloud(a)mail. house.gov, sally. mag nani andoi.ca.gov Date. 02/01/2013 10:44 PM Subject Fwd: Upset at Butane storage facility ! These photos were taken very early Wednesday morning as an associate was on their way to the airport and I just received them tonight. Perhaps, Mary ... the street maintenance that we reported on and that you inquired to Rancho about was not totally unrelated as they told you?? What was this? Why was it not reported?? What happened here??? Please get some answers on this if possible. Just when is our number going to be up down here? Thank you. Janet G [attachment "Apple _(10-17-10)_020.jpg" deleted by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US] [attachment "Apple_(10- 17-10)_013.jpg" deleted by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US] [attachment "Apple_(10-17-10)_014.jpg" deleted by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US] [attachment "Apple_(10-17-10)_015.jpg" deleted by Mary Westing/R9/USEPA/US] [attachment "Apple_(10-17-10)_016.jpg" deleted by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US] [attachment "Apple_(10-17-10)_017.jpg" deleted by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US] [attachment "Apple_(10- 17-10)_018.jpg" deleted by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US] [attachment "Apple_(10-17-10)_019.jpg" deleted by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US] [attachment "COP Flare Event.pdP'deleted by Mary Wesling/R9/USEPA/US] 30 From: Jan Perry <jcynthiaperry@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 1:37 PM To: Janet Gunter Cc: jacob.haik@lacity.org; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det310@juno.com; connie@rutter.us; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; chateau4us@att.net; CC; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; paul_h_rosenberg@hotmail.com; burling102@aol.com; marciesmiller@sbcglobal.net; diananave@gmail.com; peter.burmeister@sbcglobal.net; mandm8602@att.net; Iljonesin33 @yahoo.com; carriescoville@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Please tell us the status of the CLA report on Rancho that was due the end of last month. Let me check and find it Sent from my Whone On Feb 4, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Janet Gunter <arriane5gaol.com> wrote: At the SP Town meeting a week ago, Councilman Buscaino said that he was awaiting the LA CLA report on Rancho that was due at the end of January. Please forward us a copy of that report or give us the status of it. Thank you. Janet G 6?, From: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 3:52 PM To: iesha.wadala@lacity.org; jcynthiaperry@aol.com Cc: jacob.haik@lacity.org; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det310@juno.com; connie@rutter.us; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; chateau4us@att.net; CC; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; paul_h_rosenberg@hotmail.com; burlingl02@aol.com; marciesmiller@sbcglobal.net; diananave@gmail.com; peter.burmeister@sbcglobal.net; mandm8602@att.net; Iljonesin33 @yahoo.com; carriescoville@yahoo.com; jonathan.dearing@lacity.org Subject: Re: Please tell us the status of the CLA report on Rancho that was due the end of last month. Hi Lesha- Interesting question. Personally... there has be VERY little communication on this issue with our homeowners from Buscaino's office at all. However, having said that ..... I would assume that it is supposed to be Jacob Haik. If anyone else has any other ideas... please tell Lesha. Many thanks Lesha. Janet G -----Original Message ----- From: lesha Wadala <iesha.wadalaQ)Iacity.orq> To: Jan Perry <jcynthiaperryCcD_aol.com> Cc: Janet Gunter <arrianeSCcr�.aol.com>; jacob.haik <jacob.haik(QIacity.org>; MrEnvirlaw <MrEnvirlawa-sbcglobal.net>; det310 <det310(@)juno.com>; connie <connie(c)-rutter.us>; jody.james <jodkjames(c�sbcglobal.net>; chateau4us <chateau4us(@)att.net>; cc <cca-rpv.com>; noelweiss <noelweiss(a),ca.rr.com>; paul_h_rosenberg <paul h rosenberg(aD_hotmail.com>; burling102 <burling102(a)_aol.com>; marciesmiller<marciesmiller(c)-sbcglobal.net>; diananave <diananave@gmail.com>; peter. burmeister <peter.burmeister(a�sbcglobal.net>; mandm8602 <mandm8602(@Datt.net>; Iljonesin33 <II'onesin33(@_yahoo.com>; carriescoville <carriescovillea-yahoo.com>; Jon Dearing <jonathan.dearing(c�lacity.org> Sent: Mon, Feb 4, 2013 3:40 pm Subject: Re: Please tell us the status of the CLA report on Rancho that was due the end of last month. Hi All, I contacted our Chief Legislative Office this morning to find out more information as to when there will be a meeting with all the departments regarding this issue. I'm waiting to hear back. Who is your contact from CM Buscaino's office? Thanks, lesha On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jan Perry <jcynthiaperrVaaol.com> wrote: Let me check and find it Sent from my iPhone On Feb 4, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Janet Gunter <arriane5(c)aol.com> wrote: At the SP Town meeting a week ago, Councilman Buscaino said that he was awaiting the LA CLA report on Rancho that was due at the end of January. Please forward us a copy of that report or give us the status of it. Thank you. Janet G a lesha VVa!Ma LcOsImme EmpAy (Wice of Councilwoman Jan Perry My of L,os Amgekn, NiMh DNVOt: Phone (213) 4715903 Follow nan Per'ry onacebook and on Twitter, @CD9News Sign-up for updrates from Couricilwoman Perry: www.lacd9.com Mapr,,4 Council District 9 From: lesha Wadala <iesha.wadala@lacity.org> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 3:58 PM To: Janet Gunter Cc: jcynthiaperry@aol.com; jacob.haik@lacity.org; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det310@juno.com; connie@rutter.us; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; chateau4us@att.net; CC; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; paul_h_rosenberg@hotmail.com; burlingl02@aol.com; marciesmiller@sbcglobal.net; diananave@gmail.com; peter.burmeister@sbcglobal.net; mandm8602@att.net; Iljonesin33@yahoo.com; carriescoville@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Please tell us the status of the CLA report on Rancho that was due the end of last month. Hi All, Just spoke to the CLA's office and they told me they have almost completed their draft report, should be ready in a couple of weeks. Then off to Public Safety Committee. Will keep you posted. Thank you, Iesha On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Janet Gunter <arriane5kaol.com> wrote: Hi Lesha- Interesting question. Personally... there has be VERY little communication on this issue with our homeowners from Buscaino's office at all. However, having said that ..... I would assume that it is supposed to be Jacob Haik. If anyone else has any other ideas ... please tell Lesha. Many thanks Lesha. Janet G -----Original Message ----- From: Iesha Wadala <iesha.wadala(a.lacity.orq> To: Jan Perry <jcynthiaperry o.aol.com> Cc: Janet Gunter <arriane5(a)-aol.com>; jacob.haik <iacob.haik Q..lacity.orq>; MrEnvirlaw <MrEnvirlaw(C-)-sbcglobal.net>; det310 <det310(a)-iuno.com>; connie <connie(d-)rutter.us>; jody.james <iody.iames(d,)sbcglobal.net>; chateau4us <chateau4us(cD-att.net>; cc <ccta7.rpv.com>; noelweiss <noelweissC0)-ca.rr.com>; paul_h_rosenberg <paul h rosenberg(aDhotmail.com>; burling102 <burling102 ),aol.com>; marciesmiller<marciesmiller(a),sbcglobal.net>; diananave <diananaveCa)_gmail.com>; peter. burmeister <peter.burmeister(a sbcglobal.net>; mandm8602 <mandm8602(a)att.net>; Iljonesin33 <Il0onesin33(a—yahoo.com>; carriescoville <carriescovilleQyahoo.com>; Jon Dearing <jonathan.dearing(o-)lacity.org> Sent: Mon, Feb 4, 2013 3:40 pm Subject: Re: Please tell us the status of the CLA report on Rancho that was due the end of last month. Hi All, I contacted our Chief Legislative Office this morning to find out more information as to when there will be a meeting with all the departments regarding this issue. I'm waiting to hear back. Who is your contact from CM Buscaino's office? Thanks, lesha On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jan Perry <icynthiaperryCci).aol.com> wrote: Let me check and find it Sent from my iPhone On Feb 4, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Janet Gunter <arriane5 cnr.aol.com> wrote: At the SP Town meeting a week ago, Councilman Buscaino said that he was awaiting the LA CLA report on Rancho that was due at the end of January. Please forward us a copy of that report or give us the status of it. Thank you. Janet G tesha Wadala Legislative Deputy Office of Councilwoman Jan Perry City of Los Angeles, Ninth District Phone (213) 473--5903 Follow Councilwoman Perry on: Facebook and on Twitter c@CD9News Sign --up for updates from Councilwoman Perry: www.lacd9.com Map of Council District 9 C sha Wadala Legislative Deputy Office of Councilwoman Jan Perry City of Los Angeles, Ninth District Phone (21 473-5903 1903 l ollcgti (.:;c.�t aeil sis r Perrv on: Facebook and on. Twitier 'i,,,.:CD9News Sign-up for updMtCS from Councilwoman Perry www.lacd9.com Map of Council District 9 E)