RPVCCA_CC_SR_2011_12_20_04_CC_Policy_37_Naming_Public_FacilitiesMEMORANDUM
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CAROLYNN PETRU,DEPUTY CITY MANAGERIINTERIM~
DIRECTOR OF RECREATION &PARKS
DATE:
SUBJECT:
REVIEWED:
DECEMBER 20,2011
CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO.37:NAMING PUBLIC FACILITIES
AND PLACING OF MONUMENTS AND OTHER MEMORIALS
CAROLYN LEHR,CITY MANAGER ~
RECOMMENDATION
1)Consider whether to amend City Council Policy No.37 to modify the period of time
required before the City Council can consider naming a City facility after an individual
from the current requirement of at least five (5)years following the person's death to at
least two (2)years;and,2)Provide staff with any other direction concerning this policy.
BACKGROUND
At former Councilman Wolowicz's request,this item was placed on the November 1st
City Council agenda.At that meeting,the Council took no action on Policy No.37,but
directed staff to re-agendize the item in December 2011 or January 2012.
DISCUSSION
The City Council first adopted Policy No.37 (Naming Public Facilities and Placing of
Monuments and Other Memorials)on January 7,2003.Prior to this time,the City had
no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in honor of persons,although there
were a number of precedents which had been handled on a case-by-case basis.The
adoption of the Policy established guidelines and procedures for naming City facilities,
the permitting of monuments in public parks,most commonly in the form of plaques on
benches and trees,and the concept of establishing a centralized "Wall of Honor"for
honoring community leaders.As a result of an item initiated by former Councilman
Stern,the Council amended Policy No.37 on September 15,2009 to include the
following provision regarding Individual/Organizational Recognition:
"4.When considering naming a City facility after an individual,a
period of at least five (5)years shall have passed following the death
of such person to allow perspective and an appropriate period of
reflection."
4-1
MEMORANDUM
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CAROLYNN PETRU,DEPUTY CITY MANAGERIINTERIM~
DIRECTOR OF RECREATION &PARKS
DATE:
SUBJECT:
REVIEWED:
DECEMBER 20,2011
CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO.37:NAMING PUBLIC FACILITIES
AND PLACING OF MONUMENTS AND OTHER MEMORIALS
CAROLYN LEHR,CITY MANAGER ~
RECOMMENDATION
1)Consider whether to amend City Council Policy No.37 to modify the period of time
required before the City Council can consider naming a City facility after an individual
from the current requirement of at least five (5)years following the person's death to at
least two (2)years;and,2)Provide staff with any other direction concerning this policy.
BACKGROUND
At former Councilman Wolowicz's request,this item was placed on the November 1st
City Council agenda.At that meeting,the Council took no action on Policy No.37,but
directed staff to re-agendize the item in December 2011 or January 2012.
DISCUSSION
The City Council first adopted Policy No.37 (Naming Public Facilities and Placing of
Monuments and Other Memorials)on January 7,2003.Prior to this time,the City had
no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in honor of persons,although there
were a number of precedents which had been handled on a case-by-case basis.The
adoption of the Policy established guidelines and procedures for naming City facilities,
the permitting of monuments in public parks,most commonly in the form of plaques on
benches and trees,and the concept of establishing a centralized "Wall of Honor"for
honoring community leaders.As a result of an item initiated by former Councilman
Stern,the Council amended Policy No.37 on September 15,2009 to include the
following provision regarding Individual/Organizational Recognition:
"4.When considering naming a City facility after an individual,a
period of at least five (5)years shall have passed following the death
of such person to allow perspective and an appropriate period of
reflection."
Topic:City Council Policy No.37 -Naming of Public Facilities
Date:December 20,2011
Page 2
As indicated in the attached September 15,2009 report,former Councilman Stern
originally recommended that at least two (2)years to have passed following a person's
death before the City Council could consider a proposal to name a City facility after an
individual.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
As part of Public Comments during the November 4,2010 City Council meeting,Mike
McTaggart,son of former Mayor and City Councilman John McTaggart who passed
away a year ago that same day,requested that the Council consider modifying the City
Council's Policy requiring the aforementioned five (5)year waiting period.He indicated
that the McTaggart family had a proposal to present to the City Council to honor his
father,but were concerned that existing five (5)year stipulation was too long of a period
to wait.Depending on the outcome of the Council's discussion regarding Policy No.37,
any future action on a specific proposal from the McTaggart family would be predicated
on a nomination by a current Mayor or City Councilmember,as described in subsection
5 of the Individual/Organizational Recognition section of the policy.
FISCAL IMPACT
The adoption of any revisions to Policy No.37 to shorten the waiting period for naming
City facilities after a deceased individual would not have any immediate fiscal impact.
However,if the City Council decided to name or rename any City facilities in the future,
there may be costs associated with installing or replacing any building and roadway
signage,revising printed materials,making modifications to the City's website and other
electronic documents and notifying mapping companies and other governmental
agencies of the change.These costs can be identified and estimated at the time a
specific request is brought forward for Council consideration.
Attachments:
City Council Policy No.37,as amended on September 15,2009
Email Correspondence from Lynn Swank dated October 31,2011 &November 14,2011
Excerpt Minutes of November 1,2011
Excerpt Minutes of November 4,2010
Former Councilman Stern's Report of September 15,2009
Excerpt Minutes of September 15,2009
Staff Report of January 7,2003
Excerpt Minutes of January 7,2003
V:\CAROLYNN\REPORTS\2011\20111220_cc policy 37_naming policy.doc
4-2
Topic:City Council Policy No.37 -Naming of Public Facilities
Date:December 20,2011
Page 2
As indicated in the attached September 15,2009 report,former Councilman Stern
originally recommended that at least two (2)years to have passed following a person's
death before the City Council could consider a proposal to name a City facility after an
individual.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
As part of Public Comments during the November 4,2010 City Council meeting,Mike
McTaggart,son of former Mayor and City Councilman John McTaggart who passed
away a year ago that same day,requested that the Council consider modifying the City
Council's Policy requiring the aforementioned five (5)year waiting period.He indicated
that the McTaggart family had a proposal to present to the City Council to honor his
father,but were concerned that existing five (5)year stipulation was too long of a period
to wait.Depending on the outcome of the Council's discussion regarding Policy No.37,
any future action on a specific proposal from the McTaggart family would be predicated
on a nomination by a current Mayor or City Councilmember,as described in subsection
5 of the Individual/Organizational Recognition section of the policy.
FISCAL IMPACT
The adoption of any revisions to Policy No.37 to shorten the waiting period for naming
City facilities after a deceased individual would not have any immediate fiscal impact.
However,if the City Council decided to name or rename any City facilities in the future,
there may be costs associated with installing or replacing any building and roadway
signage,revising printed materials,making modifications to the City's website and other
electronic documents and notifying mapping companies and other governmental
agencies of the change.These costs can be identified and estimated at the time a
specific request is brought forward for Council consideration.
Attachments:
City Council Policy No.37,as amended on September 15,2009
Email Correspondence from Lynn Swank dated October 31,2011 &November 14,2011
Excerpt Minutes of November 1,2011
Excerpt Minutes of November 4,2010
Former Councilman Stern's Report of September 15,2009
Excerpt Minutes of September 15,2009
Staff Report of January 7,2003
Excerpt Minutes of January 7,2003
V:\CAROLYNN\REPORTS\2011\20111220_cc policy 37_naming policy.doc
City Council Policy No.37,
as amended on September 15,2009
4-3
City Council Policy No.37,
as amended on September 15,2009
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
NUMBER:37
DATE ADOPTED/AMENDED:01/07/03 (amended 9/15/09)
SUBJECT:Naming of Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments and Other
Memorials
POLICY:
It shall be the policy of the City Council to name City facilities in the following
manner:
•General
The policy of the City is to name facilities in a manner that will provide an
easy and recognizable reference to the City's residents and visitors.
•Geographic Location
Whenever possible,City facilities will be named for their geographic
location.The geographic location may be based on the identification of
the facility with a specific place,neighborhood,street,topographic or other
natural feature,such as a drainage course, tree or plant species,or
historical precedent.
•Individual/Organizational Recognition
The naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or community
organizations will be a rare event,and will be considered under the
following conditions:
1.The individual,a family or a community organization has made
exceptional contributions to the City,including one or more of the
following:a)financial gifts,b)public service as an elected official,c)
public service as a community volunteer,or d)long term
sponsorship agreements.
2.There should be a well-defined connection between the
contributions of the individual or community organization and the
City facility.
3.The significance of the contribution from the individual/organization
needs to be evaluated in relation to the impact of the City facility.
Individuals and organizations that have made contributions of
regional or community-wide significance may be considered for
naming of facilities that serve the entire City.Individuals and
organizations that have made significant contributions to a
particular area or neighborhood may be considered for the naming
4-4
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
NUMBER:37
DATE ADOPTED/AMENDED:01/07/03 (amended 9/15/09)
SUBJECT:Naming of Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments and Other
Memorials
POLICY:
It shall be the policy of the City Council to name City facilities in the following
manner:
•General
The policy of the City is to name facilities in a manner that will provide an
easy and recognizable reference to the City's residents and visitors.
•Geographic Location
Whenever possible,City facilities will be named for their geographic
location.The geographic location may be based on the identification of
the facility with a specific place,neighborhood,street,topographic or other
natural feature,such as a drainage course, tree or plant species,or
historical precedent.
•Individual/Organizational Recognition
The naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or community
organizations will be a rare event,and will be considered under the
following conditions:
1.The individual,a family or a community organization has made
exceptional contributions to the City,including one or more of the
following:a)financial gifts,b)public service as an elected official,c)
public service as a community volunteer,or d)long term
sponsorship agreements.
2.There should be a well-defined connection between the
contributions of the individual or community organization and the
City facility.
3.The significance of the contribution from the individual/organization
needs to be evaluated in relation to the impact of the City facility.
Individuals and organizations that have made contributions of
regional or community-wide significance may be considered for
naming of facilities that serve the entire City.Individuals and
organizations that have made significant contributions to a
particular area or neighborhood may be considered for the naming
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
Amended:September 15,2009
Page 2 of 4
of facilities that serve these areas or neighborhoods within the City,
including recreational and other amenities within City parks.
4.When considering naming a City facility after an individual,a period
of at least five (5)years shall have passed following the death of
such person to allow perspective and an appropriate period of
reflection.
5.Only a current Mayor or City Councilmember may nominate an
individual to have a City facility named in his or her honor,and the
determination will be made by the City Council.
City policy does not preclude additional opportunities for recognition that
may be created in the future.For instance,the Point Vicente Interpretive
Center is planned to include exhibits that may be funded by individual or
.corporate donations.Recognition of such donations may include a donor
wall within the Interpretive Center,or recognition of a contributor's '
sponsorship of a specific exhibit.
It shall be the policy of the"City Council to allow the placing of monuments and
other memorials on City properties under the following guidelines:
•Monuments
Monuments in honor or in memory of persons may be permitted,in
rare cases,on City property with permission of the City Council under
the following conditions:
1.The person memorialized is closely associated with the area wh~re
the monument will be located.The person memorialized is known
to,and revered,by a significant number of City residents.
2.The monument design is discreet and unobtrusive and designed to
blend into the surrounding area.A small plaque on a large rock (4
cubic feet)would be appropriate.The location of the monument
will be determined by City staff with approval of the City Council.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the monument will
be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The monument is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by
maintenance personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the
monument and may remove it at any time for any reason with
permission of the City Council.
4-5
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
Amended:September 15,2009
Page 2 of 4
of facilities that serve these areas or neighborhoods within the City,
including recreational and other amenities within City parks.
4.When considering naming a City facility after an individual,a period
of at least five (5)years shall have passed following the death of
such person to allow perspective and an appropriate period of
reflection.
5.Only a current Mayor or City Councilmember may nominate an
individual to have a City facility named in his or her honor,and the
determination will be made by the City Council.
City policy does not preclude additional opportunities for recognition that
may be created in the future.For instance,the Point Vicente Interpretive
Center is planned to include exhibits that may be funded by individual or
.corporate donations.Recognition of such donations may include a donor
wall within the Interpretive Center,or recognition of a contributor's '
sponsorship of a specific exhibit.
It shall be the policy of the"City Council to allow the placing of monuments and
other memorials on City properties under the following guidelines:
•Monuments
Monuments in honor or in memory of persons may be permitted,in
rare cases,on City property with permission of the City Council under
the following conditions:
1.The person memorialized is closely associated with the area wh~re
the monument will be located.The person memorialized is known
to,and revered,by a significant number of City residents.
2.The monument design is discreet and unobtrusive and designed to
blend into the surrounding area.A small plaque on a large rock (4
cubic feet)would be appropriate.The location of the monument
will be determined by City staff with approval of the City Council.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the monument will
be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The monument is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by
maintenance personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the
monument and may remove it at any time for any reason with
permission of the City Council.
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
Amended:September 15,2009
Page 3 of 4
•Benches or Trees
Benches or trees in honor or in memory of deceased persons may be
placed in City parks,or other City spaces,at the discretion of the City
Manager under the following conditions:
1.The bench design,or tree species,will be determined by the City
and the location of the bench or tree will be selected by the City.
2.A relatively small plaque (5"x 8"),with inscription or other written
memorial information may be placed on the bench or near the tree.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the bench or tree
will be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The bench,or tree,is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by maintenance
personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the bench
or tree and may remove it at any time for any reason without
replacement.
It shall be the policy of the,City Council to establish a "Wall of Honor"under the
following guidelines:..
•Wall of Honor
The Wall of Honor will memorialize the names of distinguished
community leadE;lJs who have made substantial contributions to the
City of Rancho Palos Verdes under the following conditions:
1.Persons nominated for the "Wall of Honor"shall have been
dedicated community leaders who have contributed significantly to
the quality of life offered by the City and realization of the vision
expressed in the original General Plan.The honoree must have
had a significant presence in the community throughout a good
portion of their life and should have made notable impacts on
sustaining the quality of life of the residents of Rancho Palos
Verdes.
2.Persons nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"will be
deceased and will not have been previously honored by other
actions of the City such as facilities named in their honor or other
memorial.
3.When a person is nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"
staff should consult with the Palos Verdes Peninsula Library
District,local historical society or other appropriate sources to
4-6
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
Amended:September 15,2009
Page 3 of 4
•Benches or Trees
Benches or trees in honor or in memory of deceased persons may be
placed in City parks,or other City spaces,at the discretion of the City
Manager under the following conditions:
1.The bench design,or tree species,will be determined by the City
and the location of the bench or tree will be selected by the City.
2.A relatively small plaque (5"x 8"),with inscription or other written
memorial information may be placed on the bench or near the tree.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the bench or tree
will be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The bench,or tree,is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by maintenance
personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the bench
or tree and may remove it at any time for any reason without
replacement.
It shall be the policy of the,City Council to establish a "Wall of Honor"under the
following guidelines:..
•Wall of Honor
The Wall of Honor will memorialize the names of distinguished
community leadE;lJs who have made substantial contributions to the
City of Rancho Palos Verdes under the following conditions:
1.Persons nominated for the "Wall of Honor"shall have been
dedicated community leaders who have contributed significantly to
the quality of life offered by the City and realization of the vision
expressed in the original General Plan.The honoree must have
had a significant presence in the community throughout a good
portion of their life and should have made notable impacts on
sustaining the quality of life of the residents of Rancho Palos
Verdes.
2.Persons nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"will be
deceased and will not have been previously honored by other
actions of the City such as facilities named in their honor or other
memorial.
3.When a person is nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"
staff should consult with the Palos Verdes Peninsula Library
District,local historical society or other appropriate sources to
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
Amended:September 15,2009
Page 4 of 4
determine the significance of the individual's contributions to the
community and report these findings to the City Council.
4.Only a current Mayor or City Council member may nominate a
citizen to be included on the "Wall of Honor."The determination of
the persons who will be included will be made by the City Council.
5.The location of the "Wall"and the format of names and inscriptions
shall be established by the City Council.
BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to guide staff ill the naming of City facilities,including parks and
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there have been no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
t,t#7:':',,....,
Although the City has ha~t'Do fo rrll aI policy for naming p~Rlic facilities and sites in
honor o,f persons,there ~r~,pregedents.Fred H~sse ~~rk and Community c.~
Center IS named for a City found.~r,Robert Ryan Park IS namedforCl former
Mayor and Councilmemb~r'and 'Vanderlip Park is namsc{for an original "-','
Peninsula landowner.The'r~is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point nam'sd'ln
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.'
The development of a Policy to guide the naming of City facilities,the permitting
of monuments,benches and trees is intended to enable these processes to be
conducted in an equitable"objective and consistent manner.In addition,the
establishment of a "Wall ofHonor"will offer a new formal opportunity for honoring
community leaders..
"
4-7
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
Amended:September 15,2009
Page 4 of 4
determine the significance of the individual's contributions to the
community and report these findings to the City Council.
4.Only a current Mayor or City Council member may nominate a
citizen to be included on the "Wall of Honor."The determination of
the persons who will be included will be made by the City Council.
5.The location of the "Wall"and the format of names and inscriptions
shall be established by the City Council.
BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to guide staff ill the naming of City facilities,including parks and
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there have been no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
t,t#7:':',,....,
Although the City has ha~t'Do fo rrll aI policy for naming p~Rlic facilities and sites in
honor o,f persons,there ~r~,pregedents.Fred H~sse ~~rk and Community c.~
Center IS named for a City found.~r,Robert Ryan Park IS namedforCl former
Mayor and Councilmemb~r'and 'Vanderlip Park is namsc{for an original "-','
Peninsula landowner.The'r~is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point nam'sd'ln
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.'
The development of a Policy to guide the naming of City facilities,the permitting
of monuments,benches and trees is intended to enable these processes to be
conducted in an equitable"objective and consistent manner.In addition,the
establishment of a "Wall ofHonor"will offer a new formal opportunity for honoring
community leaders..
"
Email Correspondence
4-8
Email Correspondence
Carolynn Petru
From:Lynn Swank [Iynn.swank@cox.net]
Sent:Monday,October 31,2011 2:16 PM
To:cc@rpv.com
Cc:Carolyn Lehr;Carla Morreale
Subject:CC Agenda Item #6 -Naming Public Facilities
City Council Members,
As recently as September 2009 the City Council adopted policy #37 honoring residents,both elected and non-
elected/living or deceased,who have contributed in a myriad of ways to the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes.The policy resulted after a thorough discussion by city council,staff and residents and reflects a fair
resolution for honoring people in this city.
This policy was adopted precisely because the City did not want to have to deal with further requests on a
case by case basis.A policy allows everyone to know the criteria for consideration of this honor.This is
especially releval'lt where the naming of facilities is concerned.5 years is a fair time to consider an
individual's contribution to our city because it allows residents to assess the contributions of an individual
and at the same time measure these contributions against other resident contributions,living or
dead.Indeed,the current policy states that the naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or
community organizations will be a rare event,and a period of 5 years ...to allow perspective and an
appropriate period of reflection.For this reason the City Council in 2009 recognized that a 5 year period to
evaluate a deceased person's contribution was necessary.5 Years also means that there may be turnover on
the city council,which allows for a broader base of opinion and will bring different thoughts to the resident's
contribution.
For future consideration I would recommend naming of facilities after individuals be stopped
completely.There are simply no new facilities at this time and use of the current policy would only mean
that a facility would be renamed,resulting in dishonoring the person whose name was given to the
facility.It could also require changing a name of a facility long established as a geographic location in the
city,such as Grandview Park,the Point Vicente Interpretive Center,and Abalone Cove Shoreline Park.Many
of these locations are named as destinations on regional and state maps,as well as the new digital
applications such as the Iphone,auto GPS systems,etc.
In fact,the city has been very careful not to give a person's name to any facility or park along our coast such
as Ocean Trails Dr.,the Nature Preserve,the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Beach,Pelican Point,etc.Even
Founder's Park was named generically after the Founders,and the individual Founders were recognized as a
group.This practice limits the number sites available for naming purposes.This would be an injustice to
others in the city who should be honored in the future.
The idea of a Wall of Honor was and is a good one.This will allow deceased,current and future residents to
be honored for their contributions to the City.
Action Recommended:Do not alter the current policy of waiting 5 years to 2 years to name a facility after an
individual.
Lynn Swank
RPV Resident
12/9/2011
Page 1 of 1
4-9
Carolynn Petru
From:Lynn Swank [Iynn.swank@cox.net]
Sent:Monday,October 31,2011 2:16 PM
To:cc@rpv.com
Cc:Carolyn Lehr;Carla Morreale
Subject:CC Agenda Item #6 -Naming Public Facilities
City Council Members,
As recently as September 2009 the City Council adopted policy #37 honoring residents,both elected and non-
elected/living or deceased,who have contributed in a myriad of ways to the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes.The policy resulted after a thorough discussion by city council,staff and residents and reflects a fair
resolution for honoring people in this city.
This policy was adopted precisely because the City did not want to have to deal with further requests on a
case by case basis.A policy allows everyone to know the criteria for consideration of this honor.This is
especially releval'lt where the naming of facilities is concerned.5 years is a fair time to consider an
individual's contribution to our city because it allows residents to assess the contributions of an individual
and at the same time measure these contributions against other resident contributions,living or
dead.Indeed,the current policy states that the naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or
community organizations will be a rare event,and a period of 5 years ...to allow perspective and an
appropriate period of reflection.For this reason the City Council in 2009 recognized that a 5 year period to
evaluate a deceased person's contribution was necessary.5 Years also means that there may be turnover on
the city council,which allows for a broader base of opinion and will bring different thoughts to the resident's
contribution.
For future consideration I would recommend naming of facilities after individuals be stopped
completely.There are simply no new facilities at this time and use of the current policy would only mean
that a facility would be renamed,resulting in dishonoring the person whose name was given to the
facility.It could also require changing a name of a facility long established as a geographic location in the
city,such as Grandview Park,the Point Vicente Interpretive Center,and Abalone Cove Shoreline Park.Many
of these locations are named as destinations on regional and state maps,as well as the new digital
applications such as the Iphone,auto GPS systems,etc.
In fact,the city has been very careful not to give a person's name to any facility or park along our coast such
as Ocean Trails Dr.,the Nature Preserve,the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Beach,Pelican Point,etc.Even
Founder's Park was named generically after the Founders,and the individual Founders were recognized as a
group.This practice limits the number sites available for naming purposes.This would be an injustice to
others in the city who should be honored in the future.
The idea of a Wall of Honor was and is a good one.This will allow deceased,current and future residents to
be honored for their contributions to the City.
Action Recommended:Do not alter the current policy of waiting 5 years to 2 years to name a facility after an
individual.
Lynn Swank
RPV Resident
12/9/2011
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of2
Carolynn Petru
From:Lynn Swank [Iynn.swank@cox.net]
Sent:Monday,November 14,2011 4:32 AM
To:Carolynn Petru
Subject:FW:Naming of RPV Facilities
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Yellow
Carolynn,You should have been copied on this since you wrote the staff report.Sorry!Lynn
From:Lynn Swank <Iynn.swank@cox.net>
Date:Mon,07 Nov 2011 09:37:55 -0800
To:"Anthony M.Misetich"<anthony.misetich@rpv.com>
Cc:Carolyn Lehr <c1ehr@rpv.com>
Subject:Naming of RPV Facilities
Anthony Misetich
Mayor Pro-Tem
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Anthony,
Last week I noted that you asked the City Manager to place on the City Council agenda for December or
January the policy honoring/recognizing RPV residents.As you are aware from my correspondence to the
council I support the recognition of our residents for their contributions to RPV.I would like some
clarification on some things before the item is placed on the agenda again.This will allow me and others to
review any proposed changes and respond appropriately.
The naming offacilities is very important to both our residents and visitors.While we are a young city,we
have become known throughout our region,state,nation and world for open space,architecture,a first class
resort and golf course,and we are a major West Coast whale watching site.RPV is a Chamber of Commerce
dream and our property values reflect this.Add to this the first class schools and one could say we have it all.
I am concerned with revising the facility naming policy from 5 years to 2 years.Naming a building or park
after a person is a very serious matter which I think requires a period of time to evaluate the individual or
group to determine if this level of recognition is warranted by the recipient and will be recognized by the
community as deserving of this honor.All of the residents should have input into a decision such as this
because a name change will dramatically alter how we refer to a location,give directions and even think
about the recipient.
The proposed policy change was placed on the council agenda on behalf of the McTaggert family.I am trying
to determine what the McTaggert family would like to name after John and a quick mental review of
existing parks and buildings makes me wonder what they specifically have in mind.I think this information is
relevant if the City Council intends to change the policy at the request of the McTaggert family because it will
allow me and others to speak to the reason for changing the policy.
My questions about naming a facility include:
•Do you know which facility the McTaggert family would like to be named after John,and if so what is
it?
12/9/2011 4-10
Page 1 of2
Carolynn Petru
From:Lynn Swank [Iynn.swank@cox.net]
Sent:Monday,November 14,2011 4:32 AM
To:Carolynn Petru
Subject:FW:Naming of RPV Facilities
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Yellow
Carolynn,You should have been copied on this since you wrote the staff report.Sorry!Lynn
From:Lynn Swank <Iynn.swank@cox.net>
Date:Mon,07 Nov 2011 09:37:55 -0800
To:"Anthony M.Misetich"<anthony.misetich@rpv.com>
Cc:Carolyn Lehr <c1ehr@rpv.com>
Subject:Naming of RPV Facilities
Anthony Misetich
Mayor Pro-Tem
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Anthony,
Last week I noted that you asked the City Manager to place on the City Council agenda for December or
January the policy honoring/recognizing RPV residents.As you are aware from my correspondence to the
council I support the recognition of our residents for their contributions to RPV.I would like some
clarification on some things before the item is placed on the agenda again.This will allow me and others to
review any proposed changes and respond appropriately.
The naming offacilities is very important to both our residents and visitors.While we are a young city,we
have become known throughout our region,state,nation and world for open space,architecture,a first class
resort and golf course,and we are a major West Coast whale watching site.RPV is a Chamber of Commerce
dream and our property values reflect this.Add to this the first class schools and one could say we have it all.
I am concerned with revising the facility naming policy from 5 years to 2 years.Naming a building or park
after a person is a very serious matter which I think requires a period of time to evaluate the individual or
group to determine if this level of recognition is warranted by the recipient and will be recognized by the
community as deserving of this honor.All of the residents should have input into a decision such as this
because a name change will dramatically alter how we refer to a location,give directions and even think
about the recipient.
The proposed policy change was placed on the council agenda on behalf of the McTaggert family.I am trying
to determine what the McTaggert family would like to name after John and a quick mental review of
existing parks and buildings makes me wonder what they specifically have in mind.I think this information is
relevant if the City Council intends to change the policy at the request of the McTaggert family because it will
allow me and others to speak to the reason for changing the policy.
My questions about naming a facility include:
•Do you know which facility the McTaggert family would like to be named after John,and if so what is
it?
12/9/2011
Page 2 of2
•If the council decides to name something after John,will residents be able to vote?As you know,others in
RPV may think that someone else should have something named after them and in fact may think that person
has contributed and is more deserving this honor than John.
•Will there be a nomination process so that all residents can propose that a facility be named after their choice?
I also would like to know the status of the Wall of Honor referenced in the policy.
•Have funds been budgeted to bring this to existence?
•Are there guidelines to use if we want to propose someone for recognition?
•Will the City charge a fee to place a name on this wall?
•Where is the wall located?
Anthony,I know that you and the new city council will be very busy in the coming year and that there are other
important issues facing RPV.I wish you well and if I can assist you in any way please let me know.
lynn Swank
RPV Resident
12/9/2011 4-11
Page 2 of2
•If the council decides to name something after John,will residents be able to vote?As you know,others in
RPV may think that someone else should have something named after them and in fact may think that person
has contributed and is more deserving this honor than John.
•Will there be a nomination process so that all residents can propose that a facility be named after their choice?
I also would like to know the status of the Wall of Honor referenced in the policy.
•Have funds been budgeted to bring this to existence?
•Are there guidelines to use if we want to propose someone for recognition?
•Will the City charge a fee to place a name on this wall?
•Where is the wall located?
Anthony,I know that you and the new city council will be very busy in the coming year and that there are other
important issues facing RPV.I wish you well and if I can assist you in any way please let me know.
lynn Swank
RPV Resident
12/9/2011
·Excerpt City Council Minutes of November 1,2011
4-12
·Excerpt City Council Minutes of November 1,2011
City Clerk orreale reported that late correspondence was distributed prio
meeting regar'this item.
egarding the InformationDirectorofFinance/IT McLean provi
Technology Infrastructure Plan.
City Attorney Lynch n d that City Manager Lehr recused herse rom the discussion of
this item and left the room,ue to her husband's position as ief Information Officer of
Microsoft.
ed on the following roll call vote:
Mayor Pro Tem Misetich moved,sec ded by Mayor ng,to:1)Approve the proposed
Information Technology Infrastruc re Plan;2)Authorize Mayor to execute the
Microsoft Enterprise license a software assurance agreem t,as amended,included
with the Information Techno gy Infrastructure Plan;3)Authoriz he purchase of the Dell
virtual machine;and,4)thorize staff to proceed with a bid proce to replace desktop
computers.
AYES:Misetich,Stern,Wolowicz,and Mayor Long
NOE .None
A NT:Campbell
STAIN:None
~y Council Policy No.37:Naming Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments
I and Other Memorials
City Clerk Morreale reported that late correspondence was distributed prior to the
meeting regarding this item.
There was no request for a staff report.
Councilman Wolowicz provided an explanation regarding the reasons he was interested
in considering a change to the current policy from five years following a person's death
for a naming prospect to two years.
Discussion ensued between Council Members and staff.
Mayor Long moved,seconded by Councilman Stern,to table the item.
City Council Minutes
November 1,2011
Page 12 of 13
4-13
City Clerk orreale reported that late correspondence was distributed prio
meeting regar'this item.
egarding the InformationDirectorofFinance/IT McLean provi
Technology Infrastructure Plan.
City Attorney Lynch n d that City Manager Lehr recused herse rom the discussion of
this item and left the room,ue to her husband's position as ief Information Officer of
Microsoft.
ed on the following roll call vote:
Mayor Pro Tem Misetich moved,sec ded by Mayor ng,to:1)Approve the proposed
Information Technology Infrastruc re Plan;2)Authorize Mayor to execute the
Microsoft Enterprise license a software assurance agreem t,as amended,included
with the Information Techno gy Infrastructure Plan;3)Authoriz he purchase of the Dell
virtual machine;and,4)thorize staff to proceed with a bid proce to replace desktop
computers.
AYES:Misetich,Stern,Wolowicz,and Mayor Long
NOE .None
A NT:Campbell
STAIN:None
~y Council Policy No.37:Naming Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments
I and Other Memorials
City Clerk Morreale reported that late correspondence was distributed prior to the
meeting regarding this item.
There was no request for a staff report.
Councilman Wolowicz provided an explanation regarding the reasons he was interested
in considering a change to the current policy from five years following a person's death
for a naming prospect to two years.
Discussion ensued between Council Members and staff.
Mayor Long moved,seconded by Councilman Stern,to table the item.
City Council Minutes
November 1,2011
Page 12 of 13
Councilman Wolowicz and Mayor Pro Tem Misetich objected to the motion,and the
motion failed.
Councilman Wolowicz moved,seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Misetich,to change the
waiting period after a person's death from 5 to 2 years to allow for a Naming Opportunity,
and that the new City Council consider further Naming Policy Changes.
The motion failed on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Misetich and Wolowicz
Stern and Mayor Long
Campbell
None
Mayor Prq Tem Misetich stated that he wanted this item placed on a future agenda in
either December or January.
Each of the Coun'embers present reported on his attendance at v .s organization
and association meetin ince the last City Council Oral Rep-ere provided on
October 15,2011.
ADJOURNMENT:
At 10:57 P.M.,Mayor Long adjo
Attest:
ria Morreale
City Clerk
W:\City Council Minutes\2011\20111101 CC MINS.doc
City Council Minutes
November 1,2011
Page 13 of 13
4-14
Councilman Wolowicz and Mayor Pro Tem Misetich objected to the motion,and the
motion failed.
Councilman Wolowicz moved,seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Misetich,to change the
waiting period after a person's death from 5 to 2 years to allow for a Naming Opportunity,
and that the new City Council consider further Naming Policy Changes.
The motion failed on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Misetich and Wolowicz
Stern and Mayor Long
Campbell
None
Mayor Prq Tem Misetich stated that he wanted this item placed on a future agenda in
either December or January.
Each of the Coun'embers present reported on his attendance at v .s organization
and association meetin ince the last City Council Oral Rep-ere provided on
October 15,2011.
ADJOURNMENT:
At 10:57 P.M.,Mayor Long adjo
Attest:
ria Morreale
City Clerk
W:\City Council Minutes\2011\20111101 CC MINS.doc
City Council Minutes
November 1,2011
Page 13 of 13
·Excerpt City Council Minutes of November 4,2010
4-15
·Excerpt City Council Minutes of November 4,2010
oved,seconded by Councilman Stern,£n--;,illU
Wit objection,Mayor Wolowicz so ordered.
~BLlC COMMENTS:
Sunshine,Rancho Palos Verdes,congratulated the Council and staff for the recent
award of a grant to improve the California Coastal Trail in Rancho Palos Verdes.She
stated that City staff needs to re-evaluate the different Trails Network Plans prepared by
the City over time.She reported that Council policy direction was needed regarding
eleven recommendations that the Open Space Task Force had presented to Council at
the conclusion of its work.
check for $250 re nting a year of free refuse service !:lncl-r1'f'.
participate in the City's Re .
Lenee Bilski,Rancho Palos Verdes, stated that she had concerns regarding the
proposed construction of the Annenberg Project at Lower Point Vicente Park.She
opined that the City-owned coastal land should be protected from the proposed
Annenberg project,and reported that the project has increased in square footage and
building height since it was introduced two years ago.She stated that much of the
building was dedicated to dogs and cats and not available for public use.She stated
that deed and land use restrictions do not allow for the use of City parkland in this way,
and that the project was not consistent with the General Plan,zoning,and coastal
program.She added that the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)suggested that
an alternative inland location for the project was preferable .
.~Mike McTaggart,Rancho Palos Verdes,expressed his thanks to the City Council and
-"community for the outpouring of concern that the family has received over the last year
after his father's passing.He requested a modification to the City Council's Policy
requiring a 5-year moratorium period after a person's passing before the consideration
of the naming of a park or facility after that City leader.He asked that an item be
agendized regarding the topic in the future.
Ted Vegvari,Palos Verdes on the Net,provided brief comments about former Mayor
John McTaggart and shared a video clip featuring him as he commented on the history
and founding of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Sharon Yarber,Rancho Palos Verdes,highlighted points from a letter that she had
emailed to Council Members regarding the proposed development of the Annenberg
Project.She noted that several City documents indicate that Lower Pt.Vicente was
zoned recreational passive which is defined as outdoor recreational and open space
recreational. She stated that a private foundation project does not belong at Lower Pt.
1...----_-,.City Council Minutes
November 4,2010
Page 2 of 9
4-16
oved,seconded by Councilman Stern,£n--;,illU
Wit objection,Mayor Wolowicz so ordered.
~BLlC COMMENTS:
Sunshine,Rancho Palos Verdes,congratulated the Council and staff for the recent
award of a grant to improve the California Coastal Trail in Rancho Palos Verdes.She
stated that City staff needs to re-evaluate the different Trails Network Plans prepared by
the City over time.She reported that Council policy direction was needed regarding
eleven recommendations that the Open Space Task Force had presented to Council at
the conclusion of its work.
check for $250 re nting a year of free refuse service !:lncl-r1'f'.
participate in the City's Re .
Lenee Bilski,Rancho Palos Verdes, stated that she had concerns regarding the
proposed construction of the Annenberg Project at Lower Point Vicente Park.She
opined that the City-owned coastal land should be protected from the proposed
Annenberg project,and reported that the project has increased in square footage and
building height since it was introduced two years ago.She stated that much of the
building was dedicated to dogs and cats and not available for public use.She stated
that deed and land use restrictions do not allow for the use of City parkland in this way,
and that the project was not consistent with the General Plan,zoning,and coastal
program.She added that the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)suggested that
an alternative inland location for the project was preferable .
.~Mike McTaggart,Rancho Palos Verdes,expressed his thanks to the City Council and
-"community for the outpouring of concern that the family has received over the last year
after his father's passing.He requested a modification to the City Council's Policy
requiring a 5-year moratorium period after a person's passing before the consideration
of the naming of a park or facility after that City leader.He asked that an item be
agendized regarding the topic in the future.
Ted Vegvari,Palos Verdes on the Net,provided brief comments about former Mayor
John McTaggart and shared a video clip featuring him as he commented on the history
and founding of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.
Sharon Yarber,Rancho Palos Verdes,highlighted points from a letter that she had
emailed to Council Members regarding the proposed development of the Annenberg
Project.She noted that several City documents indicate that Lower Pt.Vicente was
zoned recreational passive which is defined as outdoor recreational and open space
recreational. She stated that a private foundation project does not belong at Lower Pt.
1...----_-,.City Council Minutes
November 4,2010
Page 2 of 9
Former Councilman Stern's Report of September 15,2009
4-17
Former Councilman Stern's Report of September 15,2009
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Recommendation
Mayor Clark and City Council
Councilman Douglas W.Stern
September 15,2009
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
1)Direct Staff to approach the Annenberg Foundation on the feasibility of designing and
incorporating the Wall of Honor as part of the current joint enhancement program for
Lower Point Vicente Park;and,
2)Modify Policy No.37 to provide that when naming a city facility after an individual,a
period of at least two years shall have passed following the death of such person,to
allow perspective and a period of reflection before the City Council acts to name a facility
after that individual.That passage of time will increase the likelihood that decisions
comply with the standards of our Policy No.37.
Summary
On January 7,2003,the City Council adopted City Council Policy No.37:"Naming of
Public Facilities and Placing Monuments and other Memorials."This Policy established
standards to be applied when considering the naming of city assets and a method for
recognizing significant contributions to the City.It established the policy of a Wall of
Honor to honor persons.
Background
The Staff Report of January 7,2003 details the background that led to the adoption of
Policy No.37.(See attached January 7,2003 Staff Report,and August 6,2002 Staff
Report.)
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart had presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha.He announced that he
was going to propose to the City Council that the Forrestal Nature Preserve be renamed
the Jeannette Mucha Nature Preserve.
On August 6,2002 Mayor McTaggart placed the matter before the City Council for action.
At the suggestion of Councilman Gardiner,the Council elected to direct staff to research
and propose a policy establishing standards to be applied in evaluating the propriety of
4-18
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Recommendation
Mayor Clark and City Council
Councilman Douglas W.Stern
September 15,2009
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
1)Direct Staff to approach the Annenberg Foundation on the feasibility of designing and
incorporating the Wall of Honor as part of the current joint enhancement program for
Lower Point Vicente Park;and,
2)Modify Policy No.37 to provide that when naming a city facility after an individual,a
period of at least two years shall have passed following the death of such person,to
allow perspective and a period of reflection before the City Council acts to name a facility
after that individual.That passage of time will increase the likelihood that decisions
comply with the standards of our Policy No.37.
Summary
On January 7,2003,the City Council adopted City Council Policy No.37:"Naming of
Public Facilities and Placing Monuments and other Memorials."This Policy established
standards to be applied when considering the naming of city assets and a method for
recognizing significant contributions to the City.It established the policy of a Wall of
Honor to honor persons.
Background
The Staff Report of January 7,2003 details the background that led to the adoption of
Policy No.37.(See attached January 7,2003 Staff Report,and August 6,2002 Staff
Report.)
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart had presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha.He announced that he
was going to propose to the City Council that the Forrestal Nature Preserve be renamed
the Jeannette Mucha Nature Preserve.
On August 6,2002 Mayor McTaggart placed the matter before the City Council for action.
At the suggestion of Councilman Gardiner,the Council elected to direct staff to research
and propose a policy establishing standards to be applied in evaluating the propriety of
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 2 of 10
naming city assets or honoring individuals.Councilman Gardiner moved to table Mayor .
McTaggart's proposal and instead move toward establishing a policy on naming City
facilities.
The August 6,2002 City Council Minutes
Recited below are the Minutes of the August 6,2002 City Council Meeting.
Naming of Forrestal Nature Preserve.(306 x 1201)
Mayor McTaggart presented his memorandum of August 6 and the
recommendation to consider his proposal to name the Forrestal Nature Preserve
in honor of Jeannette Mucha.
Vic Ouirarte,29369 Ouailwood,stated that the docents met and did not take a
vote regarding this item because they did not know enough about this item to do
so.He stated that the docents felt that the naming of parks,streets,or buil,dings
for residents who have given of their time to the City might not be appropriate.He
suggested that the City might remember residents who are worthy of honor with a
plaque and perhaps a commemorative wall in honor of those who have served
their city.
Lois Larue,3136 Barkentine Road,stated that Jeannette Mucha was very active in
the community for years but that she felt the Forrestal Nature Preserve should not
be named after Jeannette Mucha because she did not have anything to do with
the Forrestal property.
Councilman Gardiner stated that the generic question is,"How should the City
recognize those who give so much of their time in service to the city?"He asked if
there were a City procedure or policy regarding recognizing citizens who have
served the City.
Mayor McTaggart stated that he felt the park should be named after Jeannette
Mucha because she was always working in the background on many projects in
the City,including the landslide abatement.
Mayor pro tern Stern echoed Councilman Gardiner's feelings and stated that the
Council should concentrate more on a policy for commemorating those who have
served.He suggested that a commemorative wall be proposed.
McTaggart expressed his concern and surprise that the Council was hesitating in
naming the Forrestal Nature Preserve after Jeannette Mucha.
Councilman Gardiner suggested that this item be tabled for later consideration so
that the Council can create a policy for this procedure.
Councilman Gardiner moved that this item be continued,seconded by Mayor pro
tern Stern.Motion carried 4-0-1 (Councilwoman Ferraro having left the meeting.)
4-19
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 2 of 10
naming city assets or honoring individuals.Councilman Gardiner moved to table Mayor .
McTaggart's proposal and instead move toward establishing a policy on naming City
facilities.
The August 6,2002 City Council Minutes
Recited below are the Minutes of the August 6,2002 City Council Meeting.
Naming of Forrestal Nature Preserve.(306 x 1201)
Mayor McTaggart presented his memorandum of August 6 and the
recommendation to consider his proposal to name the Forrestal Nature Preserve
in honor of Jeannette Mucha.
Vic Quirarte,29369 Quailwood,stated that the docents met and did not take a
vote regarding this item because they did not know enough about this item to do
so.He stated that the docents felt that the naming of parks,streets,or buil,dings
for residents who have given of their time to the City might not be appropriate.He
suggested that the City might remember residents who are worthy of honor with a
plaque and perhaps a commemorative wall in honor of those who have served
their city.
Lois Larue,3136 Barkentine Road,stated that Jeannette Mucha was very active in
the community for years but that she felt the Forrestal Nature Preserve should not
be named after Jeannette Mucha because she did not have anything to do with
the Forrestal property.
Councilman Gardiner stated that the generic question is,"How should the City
recognize those who give so much of their time in service to the city?"He asked if
there were a City procedure or policy regarding recognizing citizens who have
served the City.
Mayor McTaggart stated that he felt the park should be named after Jeannette
Mucha because she was always working in the background on many projects in
the City,including the landslide abatement.
Mayor pro tern Stern echoed Councilman Gardiner's feelings and stated that the
Council should concentrate more on a policy for commemorating those who have
served.He suggested that a commemorative wall be proposed.
McTaggart expressed his concern and surprise that the Council was hesitating in
naming the Forrestal Nature Preserve after Jeannette Mucha.
Councilman Gardiner suggested that this item be tabled for later consideration so
that the Council can create a policy for this procedure.
Councilman Gardiner moved that this item be continued,seconded by Mayor pro
tem Stern.Motion carried 4-0-1 (Councilwoman Ferraro having left the meeting.)
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 3 of10
Mayor pro tem Stern stated that he would like staff to do some research as to how
this is handled with other city,county,or state agencies.
Mayor McTaggart stated that he felt having a non-policy was a better way to go
about it,but that he did not mind continuing the item to discuss at another time.
The August 6,2002 Staff Report is attached.
The January 7!2003 City Council Minutes
The matter returned to the City Council on January 7,2003,when the present policy was
adopted.Recited below are the Minutes of the January 7,2002 City Council Meeting.
Policy for Naming of Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments and Other
Memorials.(306 x 1201)
City Manager Evans presented staff report and the recommendation to adopt a
policy for the naming of public facilities and placing of monuments and other
memorials on City property.
It was the consensus of the City Council to delete Item NO.2 (Benches or Trees)
which stated "No plaque,inscription or other written memorial information may be
placed on or near the bench or tree."
Mayor Stern stated that he would support the placement of small plaque no larger
than 5 by 8 inches.
Les Chapin,6710 Verde Ridge Road,representing the Pacific View Homeowners
Association,commented on members of his homeowner association's involvement
with the development of lower Hesse Park and the homeowner association's
interest in erecting a plaque to recognize the three individuals who gave tirelessly
to the efforts of developing the lower Hesse Park area.He stated that the
homeowner's association would purchase and mount the plaque,suggesting that
the plaque measure 12 by 16 inches,and noted their interest in having a small
ceremony to mount the plaque.He expressed his belief that the plaque should be
larger than 5 by 8 inches.
Councilman McTaggart addressed the City's efforts to develop Hesse Park;and
he stated that the park had already been designed and the building plans had
been altered to alleviate the concerns of the neighbors.
Councilman Clark noted his support for the homeowner's association to work with
the Public Works Department in planning a tasteful plaque to recognize these
efforts.He addressed Councilman McTaggart's comments with regard to the
development of this park and the City's part in that development and stated that he
would support a background search to determine the responsible party(s)for the
construction of this park.
4-20
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 3 of10
Mayor pro tem Stern stated that he would like staff to do some research as to how
this is handled with other city,county,or state agencies.
Mayor McTaggart stated that he felt having a non-policy was a better way to go
about it,but that he did not mind continuing the item to discuss at another time.
The August 6,2002 Staff Report is attached.
The January 7!2003 City Council Minutes
The matter returned to the City Council on January 7,2003,when the present policy was
adopted.Recited below are the Minutes of the January 7,2002 City Council Meeting.
Policy for Naming of Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments and Other
Memorials.(306 x 1201)
City Manager Evans presented staff report and the recommendation to adopt a
policy for the naming of public facilities and placing of monuments and other
memorials on City property.
It was the consensus of the City Council to delete Item NO.2 (Benches or Trees)
which stated "No plaque,inscription or other written memorial information may be
placed on or near the bench or tree."
Mayor Stern stated that he would support the placement of small plaque no larger
than 5 by 8 inches.
Les Chapin,6710 Verde Ridge Road,representing the Pacific View Homeowners
Association,commented on members of his homeowner association's involvement
with the development of lower Hesse Park and the homeowner association's
interest in erecting a plaque to recognize the three individuals who gave tirelessly
to the efforts of developing the lower Hesse Park area.He stated that the
homeowner's association would purchase and mount the plaque,suggesting that
the plaque measure 12 by 16 inches,and noted their interest in having a small
ceremony to mount the plaque.He expressed his belief that the plaque should be
larger than 5 by 8 inches.
Councilman McTaggart addressed the City's efforts to develop Hesse Park;and
he stated that the park had already been designed and the building plans had
been altered to alleviate the concerns of the neighbors.
Councilman Clark noted his support for the homeowner's association to work with
the Public Works Department in planning a tasteful plaque to recognize these
efforts.He addressed Councilman McTaggart's comments with regard to the
development of this park and the City's part in that development and stated that he
would support a background search to determine the responsible party(s)for the
construction of this park.
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 4 of 10
.,
Councilman Gardiner questioned where the City would draw its boundary for
recognition plaques,pointing out that there are many individuals in this community
deserving of recognition.He suggested that staff investigate how other cities
recognize its residents for their contributions to their cities.
Ms.Sunshine,6 Limetree Lane,advised that the California Coastal Conversancy
Board will soon be addressing this same topic for coastal zones;expressed her
belief that various trails within the City were named for no specific persons or
entities -pointing out that some trails are known by different names;and
suggested that the Open Space Planning,and Recreation and Parks Task Force
be given the task of clarifying one consistent names for each of the trails to clear
up any misidentification.With regard to the memorial rock located at Inspiration
.Point,she requested that the rock be removed or relocated to a different site,
stating that it does not look natural at its current location.She added that the rock
is a memorial to a child who lost their life in this area,but that the rock is not
located where the unfortunate incident happened.
It was the consensus of the City Council to allow plaques on benches.
Mayor Stern addressed his concern that there not be a proliferation of recognition
or memorial plaques all over the City;and stated that for this reason,he would be
favorable to a wall of honor for those who have made contributions to this City.
Councilman Clark stated that Where appropriate,it would be acceptable to
consider on a case-by-case basis those who have made a significant contribution
to the City.
It was the consensus of the City Council to support recognition plaques for both
those individuals living and deceased and that the plaques be permitted on
benches and trees.
Councilman Clark noted his support for recognizing those individuals who have
made significant contributions to the City.
Linda LoConte,6814 Kings Harbor Drive,treasurer of Pacific View Homeowner's
Association,advised that it has taken the homeowners association three years to
get this issue before the City Council;and stated that the members worked very
hard with staff to address the placement of a plaque of recognition for those who
tirelessly worked on bringing lower Hesse Park into development.
Mayor Stern explained for Ms.LoConte that their plans to erect a plaque for their
association members is not on the Agenda and stated that they will need to work
with staff to get this on the City Council Agenda for consideration.
Councilman McTaggart moved,seconded by Councilman Gardiner,to permit
plaques on trees and benches for those individuals who have made significant
contributions to the City.There being no objection,Mayor Stern so ordered.
4-21
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 4 of 10
.,
Councilman Gardiner questioned where the City would draw its boundary for
recognition plaques,pointing out that there are many individuals in this community
deserving of recognition.He suggested that staff investigate how other cities
recognize its residents for their contributions to their cities.
Ms.Sunshine,6 Limetree Lane,advised that the California Coastal Conversancy
Board will soon be addressing this same topic for coastal zones;expressed her
belief that various trails within the City were named for no specific persons or
entities -pointing out that some trails are known by different names;and
suggested that the Open Space Planning,and Recreation and Parks Task Force
be given the task of clarifying one consistent names for each of the trails to clear
up any misidentification.With regard to the memorial rock located at Inspiration
.Point,she requested that the rock be removed or relocated to a different site,
stating that it does not look natural at its current location.She added that the rock
is a memorial to a child who lost their life in this area,but that the rock is not
located where the unfortunate incident happened.
It was the consensus of the City Council to allow plaques on benches.
Mayor Stern addressed his concern that there not be a proliferation of recognition
or memorial plaques all over the City;and stated that for this reason,he would be
favorable to a wall of honor for those who have made contributions to this City.
Councilman Clark stated that Where appropriate,it would be acceptable to
consider on a case-by-case basis those who have made a significant contribution
to the City.
It was the consensus of the City Council to support recognition plaques for both
those individuals living and deceased and that the plaques be permitted on
benches and trees.
Councilman Clark noted his support for recognizing those individuals who have
made significant contributions to the City.
Linda LoConte,6814 Kings Harbor Drive,treasurer of Pacific View Homeowner's
Association,advised that it has taken the homeowners association three years to
get this issue before the City Council;and stated that the members worked very
hard with staff to address the placement of a plaque of recognition for those who
tirelessly worked on bringing lower Hesse Park into development.
Mayor Stern explained for Ms.LoConte that their plans to erect a plaque for their
association members is not on the Agenda and stated that they will need to work
with staff to get this on the City Council Agenda for consideration.
Councilman McTaggart moved,seconded by Councilman Gardiner,to permit
plaques on trees and benches for those individuals who have made significant
contributions to the City.There being no objection,Mayor Stern so ordered.
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 5 of 10
The Wall of Honor
Policy No.37 was the product of the effort by the City Council to establish a policy with
respect to "naming"and honoring of individuals.The Policy specifically contemplated the
establishment of a Wall of Honor as a means of honoring individuals who,as community
leaders,had made substantial contribution to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.It
established the standards to be applied in evaluating any possible honoree.It states:
It shall be the policy of the City Council to establish a "Wall of Honor"under the
following guidelines:
•Wall of Honor
.The Wall of Honor will memorialize the names of distinguished community leaders
who have made substantial contributions to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes
under the following conditions:
1.Persons nominated for the "Wall of Honor"shall have been dedicated
community leaders who have contributed significantly to the quality of life offered
by the City and realization of the vision expressed in the original General Plan.
The honoree must have had a significant presence in the community throughout a
good portion of their life and should have made notable impacts on sustaining the
quality of life of the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes.
2.Persons nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"will be deceased
and will not have been previously honored by other actions of the City such as
facilities named in their honor or other memorial.
3.In order to maintain the significance of being named to the "Wall of Honor"
the number of names on the "Wall"will never exceed the number of years the City
has been incorporated.
4.Only a current Mayor of City Councilmember may nominate a citizen to be
included on the "Wall of Honor."The determination of the persons who will be
included will be made by the City Council.
5.The location of the "Wall"and the format of names and inscriptions shall be
established by the City Council.
Although the City Council adopted the Policy,the City Council has not established the
location nor directed that resources be devoted for the creation of this Wall of Honor.
At the present time the City has embarked on a significant upgrade of Lower Point
Vicente,in cooperation with the Annenberg Foundation.The upcoming enhancements to
Lower Point Vicente Park provide an excellent opportunity to include the Wall of Honor in
the plan.
Therefore,I request that the City Council direct Staff to approach the Annenberg
4-22
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 5 of 10
The Wall of Honor
Policy No.37 was the product of the effort by the City Council to establish a policy with
respect to "naming"and honoring of individuals.The Policy specifically contemplated the
establishment of a Wall of Honor as a means of honoring individuals who,as community
leaders,had made substantial contribution to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.It
established the standards to be applied in evaluating any possible honoree.It states:
It shall be the policy of the City Council to establish a "Wall of Honor"under the
following guidelines:
•Wall of Honor
.The Wall of Honor will memorialize the names of distinguished community leaders
who have made substantial contributions to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes
under the following conditions:
1.Persons nominated for the "Wall of Honor"shall have been dedicated
community leaders who have contributed significantly to the quality of life offered
by the City and realization of the vision expressed in the original General Plan.
The honoree must have had a significant presence in the community throughout a
good portion of their life and should have made notable impacts on sustaining the
quality of life of the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes.
2.Persons nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"will be deceased
and will not have been previously honored by other actions of the City such as
facilities named in their honor or other memorial.
3.In order to maintain the significance of being named to the "Wall of Honor"
the number of names on the "Wall"will never exceed the number of years the City
has been incorporated.
4.Only a current Mayor of City Councilmember may nominate a citizen to be
included on the "Wall of Honor."The determination of the persons who will be
included will be made by the City Council.
5.The location of the "Wall"and the format of names and inscriptions shall be
established by the City Council.
Although the City Council adopted the Policy,the City Council has not established the
location nor directed that resources be devoted for the creation of this Wall of Honor.
At the present time the City has embarked on a significant upgrade of Lower Point
Vicente,in cooperation with the Annenberg Foundation.The upcoming enhancements to
Lower Point Vicente Park provide an excellent opportunity to include the Wall of Honor in
the plan.
Therefore,I request that the City Council direct Staff to approach the Annenberg
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 6 of 10
Foundation on the feasibility of designing and incorporating the Wall of Honor as part of •
the current joint enhancement program for Lower Point Vicente Park.
An Amendment to the Naming of City Facilities Policy
Policy No.37 also addresses the naming of city facilities after individuals.(See below.)
It established a standard to be used.At the time that the Policy was adopted on January
7,2003,the City Council noted that it may be appropriate to continue to refine the policy
over time.It is suggested that the City Council amend the Policy to provide that when the
City Council considers naming city facilities after individuals,the individual shall not be
nominated to have a city facility named in his or her honor for a period of at least two
years following the death of that individual.This would be added to the section
addressing the naming of city facilities.
The Rationale for the Requested Change to the City Policy No.37
The reason for this suggested change is to allow a proper amount of time to pass so that
the decisions of the City Council are not reached in haste or in a time frame when the
immediacy of a recent event and loss may color the judgment of the City Council in a way
that may lead to a failure to adhere to the stated Policy with respect to naming city
facilities after individuals.
The topic has surfaced on a number of occasions in the past few years where a
community leader,who often is also a dear friend of council members passes on.As one
would expect,our compassion,respect and sorrow at the immediate loss can lead to a
heightened desire at the moment to "honor"that person.Yet at that moment it is most
difficult to have a balanced perspective and apply the City Council PoliCy in a manner that
will most likely lead to it being followed in as nearly a uniform manner as possible.
A case in point was noted in the Staff Report of January 7,2003,when the issue of
adopting a naming policy was first agendized.A respected resident and civic leader,
Jeannette Mucha has recently passed on.The Mayor was honoring her with a
posthumously delivered Proclamation.
As the January 7,2003,Staff Report stated:
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha,and said that he
was going to propose to the Council that the Forrestal Nature Preserve be
renamed the Jeannette Mucha Nature Preserve.On August 12,2002 the Mayor
pl.aced the matter before the City Council for action.The following paragraphs are
excerpts from the minutes of that meeting:
Councilman Gardiner stated that the generic question is,"How should the City
recognize those who give so much of their time in service to the city?"He asked if
there were a City procedure or policy regarding recognizing citizens who have
served the City.
4-23
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 6 of 10
Foundation on the feasibility of designing and incorporating the Wall of Honor as part of •
the current joint enhancement program for Lower Point Vicente Park.
An Amendment to the Naming of City Facilities Policy
Policy No.37 also addresses the naming of city facilities after individuals.(See below.)
It established a standard to be used.At the time that the Policy was adopted on January
7,2003,the City Council noted that it may be appropriate to continue to refine the policy
over time.It is suggested that the City Council amend the Policy to provide that when the
City Council considers naming city facilities after individuals,the individual shall not be
nominated to have a city facility named in his or her honor for a period of at least two
years following the death of that individual.This would be added to the section
addressing the naming of city facilities.
The Rationale for the Requested Change to the City Policy No.37
The reason for this suggested change is to allow a proper amount of time to pass so that
the decisions of the City Council are not reached in haste or in a time frame when the
immediacy of a recent event and loss may color the judgment of the City Council in a way
that may lead to a failure to adhere to the stated Policy with respect to naming city
facilities after individuals.
The topic has surfaced on a number of occasions in the past few years where a
community leader,who often is also a dear friend of council members passes on.As one
would expect,our compassion,respect and sorrow at the immediate loss can lead to a
heightened desire at the moment to "honor"that person.Yet at that moment it is most
difficult to have a balanced perspective and apply the City Council PoliCy in a manner that
will most likely lead to it being followed in as nearly a uniform manner as possible.
A case in point was noted in the Staff Report of January 7,2003,when the issue of
adopting a naming policy was first agendized.A respected resident and civic leader,
Jeannette Mucha has recently passed on.The Mayor was honoring her with a
posthumously delivered Proclamation.
As the January 7,2003,Staff Report stated:
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha,and said that he
was going to propose to the Council that the Forrestal Nature Preserve be
renamed the Jeannette Mucha Nature Preserve.On August 12,2002 the Mayor
pl.aced the matter before the City Council for action.The following paragraphs are
excerpts from the minutes of that meeting:
Councilman Gardiner stated that the generic question is,"How should the City
recognize those who give so much of their time in service to the city?"He asked if
there were a City procedure or policy regarding recognizing citizens who have
served the City.
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 7 of 10
While it is laudable that the we often have an immediate desire to honor someone when .,
we suffer the tragic loss of a respected resident or civic leader,we also are least capable
at that moment of judging the contributions of that person to the community,and fairly
evaluating whether the person met the high standard articulated in our City Council
Policy.That Policy standard states that "The naming of City facilities in honor of
individuals or community organizations will be a rare event,and will be considered
under the following conditions:The individual,a family or a community organization
has made exceptional contributions to the City.including one or more of the following:
a)financial gifts,b)public service as an elected official,c)public service as a community
volunteer,or d)long term sponsorship agreements."
In fact,as more recent events have shown,the City Council is often not focused on the
fact that the City has a Policy on this topic,and that it contains standards that should be
applied in making these decisions.Instead,the very human reaction to the sorrow of the
moment appears to be a significant driving force leading to the determination of such
issues.
I believe that the City Council more appropriately applies this Naming Policy when it has
the benefit of reflection and perspective which time allows.I believe that the passage of
a reasonable period of time allows the City Council to reflect on the contributions of that
individual in a more objective manner,and to reflect on how that individual's contributions
may compare to others who the City Council may believe would be appropriate to honor
at some point in time.Suc~reflection heightens the possibility that we apply our Policy
fairly and uniformly,with due respect for individuals who we may deem worthy of this
honor.I believe that the suggested amendment will lessen the possibility that we might
tend to honor those whom we are closest to,yet who have not truly met the standards of
our Policy.
We also should be mindful of the very human problem that making decisions with respect
to naming of a city facility poses when City Council members are asked to make these
decisions while we are all in mourning on the passing of a respected leader.We should
recognize it is human and compassionate to desire to honor the person.It is also natural
that even if we believe that the person did not meet our Policy standard,we do not wish
to look like we are uncaring or mean-spirited simply because we do not conclude that the
person did not meet the standard.
It places a council member in an awkward position in that early time frame should a
council member believe that the person under consideration did not meet the Policy
standard.As a practical matter,it is difficult to oppose a naming proposal brought
forward for consideration in the period near the passing of such a person.
It is for that reason that I propose that we add a time period of at least two years following
the passing of a person when the City Council will not consider naming a city facility after
a person who has passed on.A person worthy of such an honor as the naming of a city
facility after him or her is no less honored,simply because we have allowed ourselves a
reasonable period of time to gain perspective.
This suggested addition is similar to that set forth in the attached University of California
4-24
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 7 of 10
While it is laudable that the we often have an immediate desire to honor someone when .,
we suffer the tragic loss of a respected resident or civic leader,we also are least capable
at that moment of judging the contributions of that person to the community,and fairly
evaluating whether the person met the high standard articulated in our City Council
Policy.That Policy standard states that "The naming of City facilities in honor of
individuals or community organizations will be a rare event,and will be considered
under the following conditions:The individual,a family or a community organization
has made exceptional contributions to the City.including one or more of the following:
a)financial gifts,b)public service as an elected official,c)public service as a community
volunteer,or d)long term sponsorship agreements."
In fact,as more recent events have shown,the City Council is often not focused on the
fact that the City has a Policy on this topic,and that it contains standards that should be
applied in making these decisions.Instead,the very human reaction to the sorrow of the
moment appears to be a significant driving force leading to the determination of such
issues.
I believe that the City Council more appropriately applies this Naming Policy when it has
the benefit of reflection and perspective which time allows.I believe that the passage of
a reasonable period of time allows the City Council to reflect on the contributions of that
individual in a more objective manner,and to reflect on how that individual's contributions
may compare to others who the City Council may believe would be appropriate to honor
at some point in time.Suc~reflection heightens the possibility that we apply our Policy
fairly and uniformly,with due respect for individuals who we may deem worthy of this
honor.I believe that the suggested amendment will lessen the possibility that we might
tend to honor those whom we are closest to,yet who have not truly met the standards of
our Policy.
We also should be mindful of the very human problem that making decisions with respect
to naming of a city facility poses when City Council members are asked to make these
decisions while we are all in mourning on the passing of a respected leader.We should
recognize it is human and compassionate to desire to honor the person.It is also natural
that even if we believe that the person did not meet our Policy standard,we do not wish
to look like we are uncaring or mean-spirited simply because we do not conclude that the
person did not meet the standard.
It places a council member in an awkward position in that early time frame should a
council member believe that the person under consideration did not meet the Policy
standard.As a practical matter,it is difficult to oppose a naming proposal brought
forward for consideration in the period near the passing of such a person.
It is for that reason that I propose that we add a time period of at least two years following
the passing of a person when the City Council will not consider naming a city facility after
a person who has passed on.A person worthy of such an honor as the naming of a city
facility after him or her is no less honored,simply because we have allowed ourselves a
reasonable period of time to gain perspective.
This suggested addition is similar to that set forth in the attached University of California
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 8 of 10
Policy,which provides for a two year waiting period following death before naming a
university facility after an individual.
The Present Policy (As it relates to this Issue)
The Present policy with the suggested addition in bold italics states:
"It shall be the policy of the City Council to name City facilities in the following
Manner:
•General
The policy of the City is to name facilities in a manner that will provide an easy
and recognizable reference to the City's residents and visitors.
•Geographic Location
Whenever possible,City facilities will be named for their geographic location.
The geographic location may be based on the identification of the facility with a
specific place,neighborhood,street,topographic or other natural feature,such
as a drainage course,tree or plant species,or historical precedent.
•Individual/Organizational Recognition
The naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or community organizations
will be a rare event,and will be considered under the following conditions:The
individual,a family or a community organization has made exceptional
contributions to the City,including one or more of the following:a)financial
gifts,b)public service as an elected official,c)public service as a community
volunteer,or d)long term sponsorship agreements.
There should be a well-defined connection between the contributions of the
individual or community organization and the City facility.
The significance of the contribution from the individual/organizations needs to
be evaluated in relation to the impact of the City facility.Individuals and
organizations that have made contributions of regional or community-wide
significance may be considered for naming of facilities that serve the entire
City.Individuals and organizations that have made significant contributions to
a particular area or neighborhood may be considered for the naming of
facilities that serve these areas or neighborhoods within the City,including
recreational and other amenities within City parks..
Only a current Mayor or City Council member may nominate an individual to
have a City facility named in his or her honor,and the determination will be
made by the City Council.[An individual shall not be nominated to have a
city facility named in his or her honor for a period of at least two years
following the death of that individual.]
City policy does not preclude additional opportunities for recognition that may
4-25
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 8 of 10
Policy,which provides for a two year waiting period following death before naming a
university facility after an individual.
The Present Policy (As it relates to this Issue)
The Present policy with the suggested addition in bold italics states:
"It shall be the policy of the City Council to name City facilities in the following
Manner:
•General
The policy of the City is to name facilities in a manner that will provide an easy
and recognizable reference to the City's residents and visitors.
•Geographic Location
Whenever possible,City facilities will be named for their geographic location.
The geographic location may be based on the identification of the facility with a
specific place,neighborhood,street,topographic or other natural feature,such
as a drainage course,tree or plant species,or historical precedent.
•Individual/Organizational Recognition
The naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or community organizations
will be a rare event,and will be considered under the following conditions:The
individual,a family or a community organization has made exceptional
contributions to the City,including one or more of the following:a)financial
gifts,b)public service as an elected official,c)public service as a community
volunteer,or d)long term sponsorship agreements.
There should be a well-defined connection between the contributions of the
individual or community organization and the City facility.
The significance of the contribution from the individual/organizations needs to
be evaluated in relation to the impact of the City facility.Individuals and
organizations that have made contributions of regional or community-wide
significance may be considered for naming of facilities that serve the entire
City.Individuals and organizations that have made significant contributions to
a particular area or neighborhood may be considered for the naming of
facilities that serve these areas or neighborhoods within the City,including
recreational and other amenities within City parks..
Only a current Mayor or City Council member may nominate an individual to
have a City facility named in his or her honor,and the determination will be
made by the City Council.[An individual shall not be nominated to have a
city facility named in his or her honor for a period of at least two years
following the death of that individual.]
City policy does not preclude additional opportunities for recognition that may
Proposed Amendment of City Council Polley No.37
Page 9 of 10
be created in the future.For instance,the Point Vicente Interpretive Center is .
planned to include exhibits that may be funded by individual or corporate
donations.Recognition of such donations may include a donor wall within the
Interpretive Center,or recognition of a contributor's sponsorship of a specific
exhibit.
University of California Policy
The University of California cover memo states:
The University has traditionally supported an interval between the University
service or death of an employee and an honorary naming for that individual.The
.Guidelines now specify that in honorary naming circumstances,the interval
between these events shall be two years.Elected officials have been added to the
list of closely associated individuals for whom an honorary naming may not take
place during elected service or during the two-year interval.No interval is required
when the proposed naming is the condition of a gift.This proviso has always
existed,but is now stated directly rather than implied.
The Policy states:
VII.Naming in honor of an individual with no gift involved
* * *
C.When an individual has served the University in an academic or important
administrative capacity,or has served the community,state,or nation in an
elected or appointed position,a proposal may be made for naming in honor of the
individual on the earlier of the following:
1.two years after retirement or other separation from the University or from
elected or appointed office;or
2.two years after the person's death,if the person had not yet retired or
otherwise separated from the University.
This Policy was obtained at:http://www.ucop.edu/ucophome/coordrev/policy/12-19-
02att.pdf.The Memo is at:http://www.ucop.edu/ucophome/coordrev/policy/12-19-
02.html.
Conclusion
1.The City Council directed that a Wall of Honor be established as a means of
honoring individuals who met the standard adopted by the City Council.It is requested
that the City Council direct Staff to approach the Annenberg Foundation on the feasibility
of designing and incorporating the Wall of Honor as part of the present enhancement
program for Lower Point Vicente Park.
2.It is requested that the City Council modify the present naming policy as it relates
to the naming of city facilities by adding a 2 year period between the passing of an
4-26
Proposed Amendment of City Council Polley No.37
Page 9 of 10
be created in the future.For instance,the Point Vicente Interpretive Center is .
planned to include exhibits that may be funded by individual or corporate
donations.Recognition of such donations may include a donor wall within the
Interpretive Center,or recognition of a contributor's sponsorship of a specific
exhibit.
University of California Policy
The University of California cover memo states:
The University has traditionally supported an interval between the University
service or death of an employee and an honorary naming for that individual.The
.Guidelines now specify that in honorary naming circumstances,the interval
between these events shall be two years.Elected officials have been added to the
list of closely associated individuals for whom an honorary naming may not take
place during elected service or during the two-year interval.No interval is required
when the proposed naming is the condition of a gift.This proviso has always
existed,but is now stated directly rather than implied.
The Policy states:
VII.Naming in honor of an individual with no gift involved
* * *
C.When an individual has served the University in an academic or important
administrative capacity,or has served the community,state,or nation in an
elected or appointed position,a proposal may be made for naming in honor of the
individual on the earlier of the following:
1.two years after retirement or other separation from the University or from
elected or appointed office;or
2.two years after the person's death,if the person had not yet retired or
otherwise separated from the University.
This Policy was obtained at:http://www.ucop.edu/ucophome/coordrev/policy/12-19-
02att.pdf.The Memo is at:http://www.ucop.edu/ucophome/coordrev/policy/12-19-
02.html.
Conclusion
1.The City Council directed that a Wall of Honor be established as a means of
honoring individuals who met the standard adopted by the City Council.It is requested
that the City Council direct Staff to approach the Annenberg Foundation on the feasibility
of designing and incorporating the Wall of Honor as part of the present enhancement
program for Lower Point Vicente Park.
2.It is requested that the City Council modify the present naming policy as it relates
to the naming of city facilities by adding a 2 year period between the passing of an
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 10 of 10
individual and deciding whether or not to name a city facility after that person.This shall·<
enhance the likelihood that the City Council applies the Policy in a uniform manner,with
as much objectivity and perspective as is reasonably possible.It will further the stated
goal of that such namings shall be a "rare occasion"involving "exceptional contributions."
It will afford all involved time to fully evaluate the propriety of a suggested naming.
Respectfully Submitted,
Douglas W.Stern
City Councilman
Attachments:
City Council Staff Report August 6,2002
City Council Staff Report Jan.7,2003
Policy No.37
University of California Policy
4-27
Proposed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37
Page 10 of 10
individual and deciding whether or not to name a city facility after that person.This shall·<
enhance the likelihood that the City Council applies the Policy in a uniform manner,with
as much objectivity and perspective as is reasonably possible.It will further the stated
goal of that such namings shall be a "rare occasion"involving "exceptional contributions."
It will afford all involved time to fully evaluate the propriety of a suggested naming.
Respectfully Submitted,
Douglas W.Stern
City Councilman
Attachments:
City Council Staff Report August 6,2002
City Council Staff Report Jan.7,2003
Policy No.37
University of California Policy
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
MAYOR McTAGGART
AUGUST 6,2002
NAMING OF FORRESTAL NATURE PRESERVE
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider Mayor McTaggart's proposal to name the Forrestal Nature Preserve in honor
of Jennette Mucha.
BACKGROUND:
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha,and said that he was
going to propose to the Council that the Forrestal Preserve be renamed the Jeannette
Mucha Preserve.The Mayor has asked that his proposal be placed on the City Council
agenda for discussion.
DISCUSSION:
Although the City has no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in honor of
persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community Center is named for
a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former Mayor and Councilmember,
Vanderlip Park is named for an original Peninsula landowner and there is a GPS
monument named in honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.
In addition to considering Mayor McTaggart's proposal the City Council may wish to
give staff direction to prepare a policy for naming of facilities and sites in the future.
Respectfully submitted,
Les Evans,
City Manager
For:
John McTaggart
Mayor
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2002\08062002 co web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2002_08_06_24_Namlng
Forrestal Nature Preserve.doc
4-28
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
MAYOR McTAGGART
AUGUST 6,2002
NAMING OF FORRESTAL NATURE PRESERVE
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider Mayor McTaggart's proposal to name the Forrestal Nature Preserve in honor
of Jennette Mucha.
BACKGROUND:
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha,and said that he was
going to propose to the Council that the Forrestal Preserve be renamed the Jeannette
Mucha Preserve.The Mayor has asked that his proposal be placed on the City Council
agenda for discussion.
DISCUSSION:
Although the City has no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in honor of
persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community Center is named for
a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former Mayor and Councilmember,
Vanderlip Park is named for an original Peninsula landowner and there is a GPS
monument named in honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.
In addition to considering Mayor McTaggart's proposal the City Council may wish to
give staff direction to prepare a policy for naming of facilities and sites in the future.
Respectfully submitted,
Les Evans,
City Manager
For:
John McTaggart
Mayor
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2002\08062002 co web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2002_08_06_24_Namlng
Forrestal Nature Preserve.doc
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
HONORABLE MAYOR &COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY MANAGER
JANUARY 7,2003
SUBJECT:POLICY FOR NAMING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PLACING
OF MONUMENTS AND OTHER MEMORIALS
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a policy for the naming of public facilities and placing of monuments and
other memorials on City property.
BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha,and said that he
was going to propose to the Council that the Forrestal Nature Preserve be
renamed the Jeannette Mucha Nature Preserve.On August 12,2002 the Mayor
placed the matter before the City Council for action.The following paragraphs
are excerpts from the minutes of that meeting:
Councilman Gardiner stated that the generic question is,"How should the City
recognize those who give so much of their time in service to the city?"He asked
if there were a City procedure or policy regarding recognizing citizens who have
served the City.
Mayor pro tem Stern echoed Councilman Gardiner's feelings and stated that the
Council should concentrate more on a policy for commemorating those who have
served.He suggested that a commemorative wall be proposed.
Councilman Gardiner suggested that this item be tabled for later consideration so
that the Council can create a policy for this procedure.
Councilman Gardiner moved that this item be continued,seconded by Mayor pro
tern Stern.Motion carried 4-0-1 (Councilwoman Ferraro having left the meeting).
DISCUSSION
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to guide staff in the naming of City facilities,including parks and
4-29
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
HONORABLE MAYOR &COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY MANAGER
JANUARY 7,2003
SUBJECT:POLICY FOR NAMING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PLACING
OF MONUMENTS AND OTHER MEMORIALS
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a policy for the naming of public facilities and placing of monuments and
other memorials on City property.
BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha,and said that he
was going to propose to the Council that the Forrestal Nature Preserve be
renamed the Jeannette Mucha Nature Preserve.On August 12,2002 the Mayor
placed the matter before the City Council for action.The following paragraphs
are excerpts from the minutes of that meeting:
Councilman Gardiner stated that the generic question is,"How should the City
recognize those who give so much of their time in service to the city?"He asked
if there were a City procedure or policy regarding recognizing citizens who have
served the City.
Mayor pro tem Stern echoed Councilman Gardiner's feelings and stated that the
Council should concentrate more on a policy for commemorating those who have
served.He suggested that a commemorative wall be proposed.
Councilman Gardiner suggested that this item be tabled for later consideration so
that the Council can create a policy for this procedure.
Councilman Gardiner moved that this item be continued,seconded by Mayor pro
tern Stern.Motion carried 4-0-1 (Councilwoman Ferraro having left the meeting).
DISCUSSION
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to guide staff in the naming of City facilities,including parks and
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 2 of6
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there are no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
Although the City has no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in
honor of persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community
Center is named for a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former
Mayor and Councilmember and Vanderlip Park is named for an original
Peninsula landowner.There is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point named in
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.
Attached is a proposed Policy for the recognition of those who have contributed
to the vision of Rancho Palos Verdes as well as others who have been proposed
for some form of memorial marker.The development of a Policy to guide the
naming of City facilities,the permitting of monuments,benches and trees is
intended to enable these processes to be conducted in an equitable,objective
and consistent manner.In addition,the establishment of a "Wall of Honor"will
offer a new formal opportunity for honoring community leaders.
Respectfully submitted,
Les Evans
City Manager
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_tacility
naming pollcy.doc
4-30
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 2 of6
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there are no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
Although the City has no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in
honor of persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community
Center is named for a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former
Mayor and Councilmember and Vanderlip Park is named for an original
Peninsula landowner.There is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point named in
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.
Attached is a proposed Policy for the recognition of those who have contributed
to the vision of Rancho Palos Verdes as well as others who have been proposed
for some form of memorial marker.The development of a Policy to guide the
naming of City facilities,the permitting of monuments,benches and trees is
intended to enable these processes to be conducted in an equitable,objective
and consistent manner.In addition,the establishment of a "Wall of Honor"will
offer a new formal opportunity for honoring community leaders.
Respectfully submitted,
Les Evans
City Manager
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_tacility
naming pollcy.doc
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
NUMBER:37
DATE ADOPTED/AMENDED:01/07/03
SUBJECT:Naming of Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments and Other
Memorials
POLICY:
It shall be the policy of the City Council to name City facilities in the following
manner:
•General
The policy of the City is to name facilities in a manner that will provide an
easy and recognizable reference to the City's residents and visitors.
•Geographic Location
Whenever possible,City facilities will be named for their geographic
location.The geographic location may be based on the identification of
the facility with a specific place,neighborhood,street,topographic or other
natural feature,such as a drainage course,tree or plant species,or
historical precedent.
•Individual/Organizational Recognition
The naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or community
organizations will be a rare event,and will be considered under the
following conditions:The individual,a family or a community organization
has made exceptional contributions to the City,including one or more of
the follOWing:a)financial gifts,b)public service as an elected official,
c)public service as a community volunteer,or d)long term sponsorship
agreements.
There should be a well-defined connection between the contributions of
the individual or community organization and the City facility.
The significance of the contribution from the individual/organizations
needs to be evaluated in relation to the impact of the City facility.
Individuals and organizations that have made contributions of regional or
community-wide significance may be considered for naming of facilities
that serve the entire City.Individuals and organizations that have made
significant contributions to a particular area or neighborhood may be
considered for the naming of facilities that serve these areas or
4-31
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
NUMBER:37
DATE ADOPTED/AMENDED:01/07/03
SUBJECT:Naming of Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments and Other
Memorials
POLICY:
It shall be the policy of the City Council to name City facilities in the following
manner:
•General
The policy of the City is to name facilities in a manner that will provide an
easy and recognizable reference to the City's residents and visitors.
•Geographic Location
Whenever possible,City facilities will be named for their geographic
location.The geographic location may be based on the identification of
the facility with a specific place,neighborhood,street,topographic or other
natural feature,such as a drainage course,tree or plant species,or
historical precedent.
•Individual/Organizational Recognition
The naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or community
organizations will be a rare event,and will be considered under the
following conditions:The individual,a family or a community organization
has made exceptional contributions to the City,including one or more of
the follOWing:a)financial gifts,b)public service as an elected official,
c)public service as a community volunteer,or d)long term sponsorship
agreements.
There should be a well-defined connection between the contributions of
the individual or community organization and the City facility.
The significance of the contribution from the individual/organizations
needs to be evaluated in relation to the impact of the City facility.
Individuals and organizations that have made contributions of regional or
community-wide significance may be considered for naming of facilities
that serve the entire City.Individuals and organizations that have made
significant contributions to a particular area or neighborhood may be
considered for the naming of facilities that serve these areas or
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 2 of4
neighborhoods within the City,including recreational and other amenities
within City parks.
Only a current Mayor or City Council member may nominate an individual
to have a City facility named in his or her honor,and the determination will
be made by the City Council.
City policy does not preclude additional opportunities for recognition that
may be created in the future.For instance,the Point Vicente Interpretive
Center is planned to include exhibits that may be funded by individual or
corporate donations.Recognition of such donations may include a donor
wall within the Interpretive Center,or recognition of a contributor's
sponsorship of a specific exhibit.
It shall be the policy of the City Council to allow the placing of monuments and
other memorials on City properties under the following guidelines:
•Monuments
Monuments in honor or in memory of persons may be permitted,in
rare cases,on City property with permission of the City Council under
the follOWing conditions:
1.The person memorialized is closely associated with the area where
the monument will be located.The person memorialized is known
to,and revered,by a significant number of City residents.
2.The monument design is discreet and unobtrusive and designed to
blend into the surrounding area.A small plaque on a large rock (4
cubic feet)would be appropriate.The location of the monument
will be determined by City staff with approval of the City Council.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the monument will
be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The monument is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by
maintenance personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the
monument and may remove it at any time for any reason with
permission of the City Council.
W:\POLlCY\20030107_COUNCIL POLICY 37_Naming Facllftles and Placing Memorlals.doc
4-32
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 2 of4
neighborhoods within the City,including recreational and other amenities
within City parks.
Only a current Mayor or City Council member may nominate an individual
to have a City facility named in his or her honor,and the determination will
be made by the City Council.
City policy does not preclude additional opportunities for recognition that
may be created in the future.For instance,the Point Vicente Interpretive
Center is planned to include exhibits that may be funded by individual or
corporate donations.Recognition of such donations may include a donor
wall within the Interpretive Center,or recognition of a contributor's
sponsorship of a specific exhibit.
It shall be the policy of the City Council to allow the placing of monuments and
other memorials on City properties under the following guidelines:
•Monuments
Monuments in honor or in memory of persons may be permitted,in
rare cases,on City property with permission of the City Council under
the follOWing conditions:
1.The person memorialized is closely associated with the area where
the monument will be located.The person memorialized is known
to,and revered,by a significant number of City residents.
2.The monument design is discreet and unobtrusive and designed to
blend into the surrounding area.A small plaque on a large rock (4
cubic feet)would be appropriate.The location of the monument
will be determined by City staff with approval of the City Council.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the monument will
be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The monument is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by
maintenance personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the
monument and may remove it at any time for any reason with
permission of the City Council.
W:\POLlCY\20030107_COUNCIL POLICY 37_Naming Facllftles and Placing Memorlals.doc
(
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 3 of4
•Benches or Trees
Benches or trees in honor or in memory of deceased persons may be
placed in City parks,or other City spaces,at the discretion of the City
Manager under the following conditions:
1.The bench design,or tree species,will be determined by the City
and the location of the bench or tree will be selected by the City.
2.A relatively small plaque (5"x 8"),with inscription or other written
memorial information may be placed on the bench or near the tree.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the bench or tree
will be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The bench,or tree,is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by maintenance
personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the bench
or tree and may remove it at any time for any reason without
replacement.
It shall be the policy of the City Council to establish a "Wall of Honor"under the
following guidelines:
•Wall of Honor
The Wall of Honor will memorialize the names of distinguished community
leaders who have made substantial contributions to the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes under the following conditions:
1.Persons nominated for the "Wall of Honor"shall have been dedicated
community leaders who have contributed significantly to the quality of
life offered by the City and realization of the vision expressed in the
original General Plan.The honoree must have had a significant
presence in the community throughout a good portion of their life and
should have made notable impacts on sustaining the quality of life of
the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes.
2.Persons nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"will be
deceased and will not have been previously honored by other actions
of the City such as facilities named in their honor or other memorial.
3.In order to maintain the significance of being named to the "Wall of
Honor"the number of names on the 'Wall"will never exceed the
number of years the City has been incorporated.
4.Only a current Mayor of City Councilmember may nominate a citizen to
be included on the "Wall of Honor."The determination of the persons
who will be included will be made by the City Council.
W:\POLlCy\20030107_COUNCIL POLICY 37_Naming Facilities and Placing Memorials.doc
4-33
(
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 3 of4
•Benches or Trees
Benches or trees in honor or in memory of deceased persons may be
placed in City parks,or other City spaces,at the discretion of the City
Manager under the following conditions:
1.The bench design,or tree species,will be determined by the City
and the location of the bench or tree will be selected by the City.
2.A relatively small plaque (5"x 8"),with inscription or other written
memorial information may be placed on the bench or near the tree.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the bench or tree
will be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The bench,or tree,is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by maintenance
personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the bench
or tree and may remove it at any time for any reason without
replacement.
It shall be the policy of the City Council to establish a "Wall of Honor"under the
following guidelines:
•Wall of Honor
The Wall of Honor will memorialize the names of distinguished community
leaders who have made substantial contributions to the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes under the following conditions:
1.Persons nominated for the "Wall of Honor"shall have been dedicated
community leaders who have contributed significantly to the quality of
life offered by the City and realization of the vision expressed in the
original General Plan.The honoree must have had a significant
presence in the community throughout a good portion of their life and
should have made notable impacts on sustaining the quality of life of
the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes.
2.Persons nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"will be
deceased and will not have been previously honored by other actions
of the City such as facilities named in their honor or other memorial.
3.In order to maintain the significance of being named to the "Wall of
Honor"the number of names on the 'Wall"will never exceed the
number of years the City has been incorporated.
4.Only a current Mayor of City Councilmember may nominate a citizen to
be included on the "Wall of Honor."The determination of the persons
who will be included will be made by the City Council.
W:\POLlCy\20030107_COUNCIL POLICY 37_Naming Facilities and Placing Memorials.doc
(
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 4 of4
5.The location of the "Wall"and the format of names and inscriptions
shall be established by the City Council.
BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to gUide staff in the naming of City facilities,including parks and
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there have been no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
Although the City has had no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in
honor of persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community
Center is named for a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former
Mayor and Councilmember and Vanderlip Park is named for an original
Peninsula landowner.There is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point named in
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.
The development of a Policy to guide the naming of City facilities,the permitting
of monuments,benches and trees is intended to enable these processes to be
conducted in an equitable,objective and consistent manner.In addition,the
establishment of a "Wall of Honor"will offer a new formal opportunity for honoring
community leaders.
W:\POLlCY\20030107_COUNCIL POLICY 37 _Naming Facilities and Placing Memorials.doc
4-34
(
City Council Policy No.37 for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 4 of4
5.The location of the "Wall"and the format of names and inscriptions
shall be established by the City Council.
BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to gUide staff in the naming of City facilities,including parks and
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there have been no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
Although the City has had no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in
honor of persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community
Center is named for a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former
Mayor and Councilmember and Vanderlip Park is named for an original
Peninsula landowner.There is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point named in
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.
The development of a Policy to guide the naming of City facilities,the permitting
of monuments,benches and trees is intended to enable these processes to be
conducted in an equitable,objective and consistent manner.In addition,the
establishment of a "Wall of Honor"will offer a new formal opportunity for honoring
community leaders.
W:\POLlCY\20030107_COUNCIL POLICY 37 _Naming Facilities and Placing Memorials.doc
December 19,2002
Policy on Naming University Properties,
Academic and Non-Academic Programs,and Facilities
The University of California has a long-standing tradition of naming University
properties,academic and non-academic programs,and facilities in honor of persons or entities
that have made important contributions to enable the teaching,research and public service
mission of the University.All naming in recognition of an honoree must be consistent with the
University's role as a public trust.Accordingly,all such proposals shall be reviewed and
approved in accordance with this policy,and with related University policies and guidelines.
In 1996,The Regents delegated to the President authority for naming all University
properties,programs,and facilities.While certain authorities for naming have been re-delegated
to the Chancellors,the following guidelines shall govern any naming decision.
Guidelines for Naming University Properties.
Academic and Non-Academic Programs,and Facilities
I.No commitment regarding naming shall be made to a donor or a non-donor honoree prior
to approval of the related proposal for naming.Each proposal shall be made in writing in
accordance with these guidelines.The proposal and record of the action taken shall be
maintained in the permanent archives of the campus or laboratory.
II.Each proposal for naming shall be considered on its merits and not because a gift meets a
particular predetermined goal.In this regard,all due attention shall be given to both the
long-term and short-term appropriateness of a naming.
m.A proposal for naming shall include documentation of the following:
A.A thorough analysis of the proposal in relation to naming policy and guidelines,as
well as a financial review;
B.A consultation process to provide the benefit of the collective institutional
memory and a broad campus perspective with regard to naming activities.The
process shall involve one or more of the following:(1)a standing committee on
naming to include regular faculty and staff representation;(2)the executive
committee of the Academic Senate;or (3)an appropriate consultative process that
represents broad institutional interests;and
C.Review by campus or laboratory counsel,or by the General Counsel of the
University,as appropriate.
.,
4-35
December 19,2002
Policy on Naming University Properties,
Academic and Non-Academic Programs,and Facilities
The University of California has a long-standing tradition of naming University
properties,academic and non-academic programs,and facilities in honor of persons or entities
that have made important contributions to enable the teaching,research and public service
mission of the University.All naming in recognition of an honoree must be consistent with the
University's role as a public trust.Accordingly,all such proposals shall be reviewed and
approved in accordance with this policy,and with related University policies and guidelines.
In 1996,The Regents delegated to the President authority for naming all University
properties,programs,and facilities.While certain authorities for naming have been re-delegated
to the Chancellors,the following guidelines shall govern any naming decision.
Guidelines for Naming University Properties.
Academic and Non-Academic Programs,and Facilities
I.No commitment regarding naming shall be made to a donor or a non-donor honoree prior
to approval of the related proposal for naming.Each proposal shall be made in writing in
accordance with these guidelines.The proposal and record of the action taken shall be
maintained in the permanent archives of the campus or laboratory.
II.Each proposal for naming shall be considered on its merits and not because a gift meets a
particular predetermined goal.In this regard,all due attention shall be given to both the
long-term and short-term appropriateness of a naming.
m.A proposal for naming shall include documentation of the following:
A.A thorough analysis of the proposal in relation to naming policy and guidelines,as
well as a financial review;
B.A consultation process to provide the benefit of the collective institutional
memory and a broad campus perspective with regard to naming activities.The
process shall involve one or more of the following:(1)a standing committee on
naming to include regular faculty and staff representation;(2)the executive
committee of the Academic Senate;or (3)an appropriate consultative process that
represents broad institutional interests;and
C.Review by campus or laboratory counsel,or by the General Counsel of the
University,as appropriate.
.,
IV.When a facility or area is named in recognition of a donor or a non-donor honoree,that
name will generally be effective for the useful life of the facility or the designated use of
the area.If a facility must be replaced or substantially renovated,or the use of an area re-
designated,it may be named for a new donor,subject to the specific terms and conditions
set forth in any gift agreements related to the prior naming action.
V.In any proposal for naming an academic or non-academic program in recognition of a
donor or a non-donor honoree,consideration should be given to ensure that any
associated endowment will be sufficient to sustain the program,since the naming shall be
in effect for the life of the program.
VI..When the proposed naming of a facility would recognize an individual,Regents'policy
requires the complete name of the individual be used.The last name of the individual so
honored may be used in referring informally to the facility and may be used on the name
plaque affixed to the facility.
VII.Naming in honor of an individual with no gift involved
A.No commitment for naming shall be made prior to approval of the proposed name.
B.A proposed honoree shall have achieved distinction in one or more of the
following ways:
1.While serving the University in an academic capacity,the individual has
demonstrated high scholarly distinction and has earned a national or
international reputation;
2.While serving the University in an important administrative capacity,the
individual has rendered distinguished service which warrants recognition
of the individual's exceptional contributions to the welfare of the
University;
3.The individual has contributed in truly exceptional ways to the welfare of
the institution or achieved such unique distinction as to warrant
recognition.
C.When an individual has served the University in an academic or important
administrative capacity,or has served the community,state,or nation in an elected
or appointed position,a proposal may be made for naming in honor of the
individual on the earlier ofthe following:
1.two years after retirement or other separation from the University or from
elected or appointed office;or
4-36
IV.When a facility or area is named in recognition of a donor or a non-donor honoree,that
name will generally be effective for the useful life of the facility or the designated use of
the area.If a facility must be replaced or substantially renovated,or the use of an area re-
designated,it may be named for a new donor,subject to the specific terms and conditions
set forth in any gift agreements related to the prior naming action.
V.In any proposal for naming an academic or non-academic program in recognition of a
donor or a non-donor honoree,consideration should be given to ensure that any
associated endowment will be sufficient to sustain the program,since the naming shall be
in effect for the life of the program.
VI..When the proposed naming of a facility would recognize an individual,Regents'policy
requires the complete name of the individual be used.The last name of the individual so
honored may be used in referring informally to the facility and may be used on the name
plaque affixed to the facility.
VII.Naming in honor of an individual with no gift involved
A.No commitment for naming shall be made prior to approval of the proposed name.
B.A proposed honoree shall have achieved distinction in one or more of the
following ways:
1.While serving the University in an academic capacity,the individual has
demonstrated high scholarly distinction and has earned a national or
international reputation;
2.While serving the University in an important administrative capacity,the
individual has rendered distinguished service which warrants recognition
of the individual's exceptional contributions to the welfare of the
University;
3.The individual has contributed in truly exceptional ways to the welfare of
the institution or achieved such unique distinction as to warrant
recognition.
C.When an individual has served the University in an academic or important
administrative capacity,or has served the community,state,or nation in an elected
or appointed position,a proposal may be made for naming in honor of the
individual on the earlier ofthe following:
1.two years after retirement or other separation from the University or from
elected or appointed office;or
2.two years after the person's death,if the person had not yet retired or
othelWise separated from the University.
Note:A naming in honor of an individual who has retired from the University but
has been recalled to full or part time employment may be made based on the
earlier of the two above criteria,notwithstanding the recall status.
VIII.Naming involving a gift
A.Campus counsel,laboratory counsel,or the General Counsel of the University,as
appropriate,shall review draft language for a gift agreement that includes then
proposed naming of a University property,academic and non-academic program,
and/or facility in recognition of the gift.
1.No commitment for naming shall be made prior to approval of the
proposed name.
2.In reviewing a request for approval of naming,consideration shall be given
to:
a.the significance of the proposed gift as it relates to the realization
and/or success of the project or to the enhancement of the project's
usefulness to the University;
b.the urgency of need for the project or for support funds for the
project;
c.the eminence,reputation and integrity of the individual or entity
whose name is proposed;and
d.the relationship of the individual or entity to the University.
3.The gift shall constitute a significant portion of the total cost of the project
to be named.The gift shall either:(1)fund the total cost of the project to
be named;or (2)provide substantial funding for that portion of the total
cost which would not have been available from another source (such as
federal or state loans or appropriations,student fees,or bond issues).
4.To avoid any appearance of commercial influence or conflict of interest,
additional due diligence should be taken before recommending the naming
of a major program or area,building,open space,or roadway that involves
the name of a corporation or a corporate foundation.The naming for an
individual associated with a corporation should be handled as any naming
for an individual.
.,
4-37
2.two years after the person's death,if the person had not yet retired or
othelWise separated from the University.
Note:A naming in honor of an individual who has retired from the University but
has been recalled to full or part time employment may be made based on the
earlier of the two above criteria,notwithstanding the recall status.
VIII.Naming involving a gift
A.Campus counsel,laboratory counsel,or the General Counsel of the University,as
appropriate,shall review draft language for a gift agreement that includes then
proposed naming of a University property,academic and non-academic program,
and/or facility in recognition of the gift.
1.No commitment for naming shall be made prior to approval of the
proposed name.
2.In reviewing a request for approval of naming,consideration shall be given
to:
a.the significance of the proposed gift as it relates to the realization
and/or success of the project or to the enhancement of the project's
usefulness to the University;
b.the urgency of need for the project or for support funds for the
project;
c.the eminence,reputation and integrity of the individual or entity
whose name is proposed;and
d.the relationship of the individual or entity to the University.
3.The gift shall constitute a significant portion of the total cost of the project
to be named.The gift shall either:(1)fund the total cost of the project to
be named;or (2)provide substantial funding for that portion of the total
cost which would not have been available from another source (such as
federal or state loans or appropriations,student fees,or bond issues).
4.To avoid any appearance of commercial influence or conflict of interest,
additional due diligence should be taken before recommending the naming
of a major program or area,building,open space,or roadway that involves
the name of a corporation or a corporate foundation.The naming for an
individual associated with a corporation should be handled as any naming
for an individual.
.,
5.Corporate names may be used to designate individual rooms or suites of
rooms,as well as endowed chairs and professorships.Plaques in public
spaces within buildings may recognize the contributions of corporations.
The size,design,and wording of plaques and other signs that acknowledge
corporate generosity and express University appreciation should be modest
in size and exclude logos to avoid the appearance of advertising.
6.A naming conferred in recognition of a pledge is contingent on fulfillment
of that pledge and will be approved on that condition.
7.When a proposed naming for an individual is accompanied by a gift,and
the individual to be honored is serving the University in an academic or
administrative capacity,or is serving the community,state,or nation in an
elected or appointed position,the naming may take effect upon approval.
IX.Renaming
A proposal to rename a facility or area or to add a second name shall adhere to the criteria
outlined above.In addition,these principles shall be followed:
A.Any proposal to rename a facility or area or to add a second name in recognition
of a gift shall be reviewed by the General Counsel of the University.The review
shall include any gift documents pertaining to the original gift and related naming,
as well as the gift documents pertaining to the subsequent gift and proposed
renaming.
B.When a facility that has been named in recognition of a gift or an individual has
reached the end of its useful life and will be replaced or substantially renovated,
the replaced or renovated structure may be renamed in recognition of another gift.
C.When an area named in recognition of a gift or in honor of an individual will be
developed for another use,the new facilities may be named in recognition ofnew
gifts.
D.Appropriate recognition of earlier donors and honorees shall be included in or
adjacent to new and renovated facilities,as well as in redeveloped areas.
E.When a facility or area is proposed for renaming,campus or University
representatives will make all reasonable efforts to inform in advance the original
donors or honorees and their immediate family members.
X.Campus and Laboratory Responsibility
Each Chancellor and the Laboratory Director shall designate an officer to coordinate all
proposals for naming,maintain records on gift documentation and the related consultation
4-38
5.Corporate names may be used to designate individual rooms or suites of
rooms,as well as endowed chairs and professorships.Plaques in public
spaces within buildings may recognize the contributions of corporations.
The size,design,and wording of plaques and other signs that acknowledge
corporate generosity and express University appreciation should be modest
in size and exclude logos to avoid the appearance of advertising.
6.A naming conferred in recognition of a pledge is contingent on fulfillment
of that pledge and will be approved on that condition.
7.When a proposed naming for an individual is accompanied by a gift,and
the individual to be honored is serving the University in an academic or
administrative capacity,or is serving the community,state,or nation in an
elected or appointed position,the naming may take effect upon approval.
IX.Renaming
A proposal to rename a facility or area or to add a second name shall adhere to the criteria
outlined above.In addition,these principles shall be followed:
A.Any proposal to rename a facility or area or to add a second name in recognition
of a gift shall be reviewed by the General Counsel of the University.The review
shall include any gift documents pertaining to the original gift and related naming,
as well as the gift documents pertaining to the subsequent gift and proposed
renaming.
B.When a facility that has been named in recognition of a gift or an individual has
reached the end of its useful life and will be replaced or substantially renovated,
the replaced or renovated structure may be renamed in recognition of another gift.
C.When an area named in recognition of a gift or in honor of an individual will be
developed for another use,the new facilities may be named in recognition ofnew
gifts.
D.Appropriate recognition of earlier donors and honorees shall be included in or
adjacent to new and renovated facilities,as well as in redeveloped areas.
E.When a facility or area is proposed for renaming,campus or University
representatives will make all reasonable efforts to inform in advance the original
donors or honorees and their immediate family members.
X.Campus and Laboratory Responsibility
Each Chancellor and the Laboratory Director shall designate an officer to coordinate all
proposals for naming,maintain records on gift documentation and the related consultation
process,and assure consistency in donor and public communications related to each gift
and its restricted use.
XI.Changed Circumstances
If the campus or laboratory proposes to change the function of a named facility or area,it
must document the review ofrelated gift agreements to detennine ifthe proposed use is
consistent with the restrictions that may have been previously stipulated.If the proposal
for change in use is inconsistent,the campus or laboratory counselor the General Counsel
of the University shall be consulted.
If at any time following the approval of a naming,circumstances change substantially so
.that the continued use of that name may compromise the public trust,the General
Counsel of the University will consult with the California Attorney General regarding
future action.
Related Policies and Documents
1.Regents'Policy on Naming Facilities to Include the Full Name of the Individual,
February 18,1966.
2.Regents'Policy on Commemorative Displays,March 8,1940.
3.Regents'Policy on Naming Residence Halls,November 20,1959.
4.Regents'Policy on Gifts and Endowments with Respect to Private Institutions,July 21,
1961.
5.Regents'Policy on Fundraising Campaigns,July 16,1993 (amended November 19,
1993).
6.Regents'Policy on Professorial Name Chairs,November 16,1962 (amended May 17,
1963).
7.Policy on Endowed Chairs and Professorships and the Administrative Guidelines and
Procedures:Endowed Chairs and Professorships,May 21,1998.
8.Presidential Delegation of Authority to the Chancellors regarding Naming University
Properties,Programs,and Facilities,October 14,1993.
9.Vice President Baker letter to Chancellors regarding authority for naming facilities and
programs,June 14,1996.
4-39
process,and assure consistency in donor and public communications related to each gift
and its restricted use.
XI.Changed Circumstances
If the campus or laboratory proposes to change the function of a named facility or area,it
must document the review ofrelated gift agreements to detennine ifthe proposed use is
consistent with the restrictions that may have been previously stipulated.If the proposal
for change in use is inconsistent,the campus or laboratory counselor the General Counsel
of the University shall be consulted.
If at any time following the approval of a naming,circumstances change substantially so
.that the continued use of that name may compromise the public trust,the General
Counsel of the University will consult with the California Attorney General regarding
future action.
Related Policies and Documents
1.Regents'Policy on Naming Facilities to Include the Full Name of the Individual,
February 18,1966.
2.Regents'Policy on Commemorative Displays,March 8,1940.
3.Regents'Policy on Naming Residence Halls,November 20,1959.
4.Regents'Policy on Gifts and Endowments with Respect to Private Institutions,July 21,
1961.
5.Regents'Policy on Fundraising Campaigns,July 16,1993 (amended November 19,
1993).
6.Regents'Policy on Professorial Name Chairs,November 16,1962 (amended May 17,
1963).
7.Policy on Endowed Chairs and Professorships and the Administrative Guidelines and
Procedures:Endowed Chairs and Professorships,May 21,1998.
8.Presidential Delegation of Authority to the Chancellors regarding Naming University
Properties,Programs,and Facilities,October 14,1993.
9.Vice President Baker letter to Chancellors regarding authority for naming facilities and
programs,June 14,1996.
Excerpt City Council Minutes of September 15, 2009
4-40
4-41
NOES:None
ABSENT:Clark
t:posed Amendment of City Council Policy No.37 (306)
Councilman Stern provided a brief staff report on the item.He reported that his
proposal relates to City Council Policy No.37,which is the Council's naming policy for
City facilities and the policy regarding recognition by allowing plaques on park benches,
names on the Wall of Honor,etc.He stated that he proposed the Wall of Honor to be
located at the Pt.Vicente Interpretive Center along with other improvements to that site.
Council discussion ensued regarding the benefits and disadvantages of the passage of
time after the passing of a person who has made significant contributions to the City;
the artificial constraint of limiting of the number of names on the Wall of Honor;the
consideration of the Council passing a resolution,as a permanent record of the City,
recognizing the service of a particular individual;the dedication of Founders Park to the
founders of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes;criteria to be used to determine significant
contributions to the City;
Councilman Stern moved,seconded by Councilman Dyda,to 1)Direct Staff to approach
the Annenberg Foundation on the feasibility of designing and incorporating the Wall of
Honor as part of the current joint enhancement program for Lower Point Vicente Park;
and,2)Modify Policy No.37,as amended,to provide that when naming a City facility
after an individual,a period of at least five years shall have passed following the death
of such person,to allow perspective and a period of reflection before the City Council
acts to name a facility after that individual,noting that the passage of time will increase
the likelihood that decisions comply with the standards of Policy No.37.Council
directed that the limit on the number of names on the Wall of Honor be eliminated;and
that when name recognition is considered staff should consult with the local Historical
Society,if any,regarding the significance of the individual's contributions.
The motion passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
L NOES:
ABSENT:
~
Dyda,Long,Stern,and Mayor Pro Tem Wolowicz
None
Clark
Ordinance Adopting a City Council Salary In Lieu of the Current Monthly Expense
Reimbursement (306)
City Attorney Lynch provided a brief staff report regarding this item.
Council discussion ensued regarding the amount of the monthly stipend.
City Council Minutes
September 15,2009
Page 10 of 11
Staff Report of January 7,2003
4-42
Staff Report of January 7,2003
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
HONORABLE MAYOR &COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY MANAGER
JANUARY 7,2003
SUBJECT:POLICY FOR NAMING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PLACING
OF MONUMENTS AND OTHER MEMORIALS
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a policy for the naming of public facilities and placing of monuments and
other memorials on City property.
BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha,and said that he
was going to propose to the Council that the Forrestal Nature Preserve be
renamed the Jeannette Mucha Nature Preserve.On August 12,2002 the Mayor
placed the matter before the City Council for action.The following paragraphs
are excerpts from the minutes of that meeting:
Councilman Gardiner stated that the generic question is,"How should the City
recognize those who give so much of their time in service to the city?"He asked
if there were a City procedure or policy regarding recognizing citizens who have
served the City.
Mayor pro tern Stern echoed Councilman Gardiner's feelings and stated that the
Council should concentrate more on a policy for commemorating those who have
served.He suggested that a commemorative wall be proposed.
Councilman Gardiner suggested that this item be tabled for later consideration so
that the Council can create a policy for this procedure.
Councilman Gardiner moved that this item be continued,seconded by Mayor pro
tern Stern.Motion carried 4-0-1 (Councilwoman Ferraro having left the meeting).
DISCUSSION
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to guide staff in the naming of City facilities,including parks and
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there are no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
4-43
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
HONORABLE MAYOR &COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY MANAGER
JANUARY 7,2003
SUBJECT:POLICY FOR NAMING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PLACING
OF MONUMENTS AND OTHER MEMORIALS
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a policy for the naming of public facilities and placing of monuments and
other memorials on City property.
BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting on June 12,2002 Mayor McTaggart presented a
proclamation in memory of Jeannette Mucha to Valerie Mucha,and said that he
was going to propose to the Council that the Forrestal Nature Preserve be
renamed the Jeannette Mucha Nature Preserve.On August 12,2002 the Mayor
placed the matter before the City Council for action.The following paragraphs
are excerpts from the minutes of that meeting:
Councilman Gardiner stated that the generic question is,"How should the City
recognize those who give so much of their time in service to the city?"He asked
if there were a City procedure or policy regarding recognizing citizens who have
served the City.
Mayor pro tern Stern echoed Councilman Gardiner's feelings and stated that the
Council should concentrate more on a policy for commemorating those who have
served.He suggested that a commemorative wall be proposed.
Councilman Gardiner suggested that this item be tabled for later consideration so
that the Council can create a policy for this procedure.
Councilman Gardiner moved that this item be continued,seconded by Mayor pro
tern Stern.Motion carried 4-0-1 (Councilwoman Ferraro having left the meeting).
DISCUSSION
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to guide staff in the naming of City facilities,including parks and
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there are no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 2 of 6
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
Although the City has no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in
honor of persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community
Center is named for a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former
Mayor and Council member and Vanderlip Park is named for an original
Peninsula landowner.There is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point named in
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.
Attached is a proposed Policy for the recognition of those who have contributed
to the vision of Rancho Palos Verdes as well as others who have been proposed
for some form of memorial marker.The development of a Policy to guide the
naming of City facilities,the permitting of monuments,benches and trees is
intended to enable these processes to be conducted in an equitable,objective
and consistent manner.In addition,the establishment of a "Wall of Honor"will
offer a new formal opportunity for honoring community leaders.
Respectfully submitted,
Les Evans
City Manager
Cc:DRAFT Policy
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA..-SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc 4-44
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 2 of 6
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
Although the City has no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in
honor of persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community
Center is named for a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former
Mayor and Council member and Vanderlip Park is named for an original
Peninsula landowner.There is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point named in
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.
Attached is a proposed Policy for the recognition of those who have contributed
to the vision of Rancho Palos Verdes as well as others who have been proposed
for some form of memorial marker.The development of a Policy to guide the
naming of City facilities,the permitting of monuments,benches and trees is
intended to enable these processes to be conducted in an equitable,objective
and consistent manner.In addition,the establishment of a "Wall of Honor"will
offer a new formal opportunity for honoring community leaders.
Respectfully submitted,
Les Evans
City Manager
Cc:DRAFT Policy
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA..-SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 3 of 6
DRAFT POLICY:
It shall be the policy of the City Council to name City facilities in the following
manner:
•General
The policy of the City is to name facilities in a manner that will provide an
easy and recognizable reference to the City's residents and visitors.
•Geographic Location
Whenever possible,City facilities will be named for their geographic
location.The geographic location may be based on the identification of
the facility with a specific place,neighborhood,street,topographic or other
.natural feature,such as a drainage course, tree or plant species,or
historical precedent.
•Individual/Organizational Recognition
The naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or community
organizations will be a rare event,and will be considered under the
following conditions:The individual,a family or a community organization
has made exceptional contributions to the City,including one or more of
the following:a)financial gifts,b)public service as an elected official,
c)public service as a community volunteer,or d)long term sponsorship
agreements.
There should be a well-defined connection between the contributions of
the individual or community organization and the City facility.
The significance of the contribution from the individual/organizations
needs to be evaluated in relation to the impact of the City facility.
Individuals and organizations that have made contributions of regional or
community-wide significance may be considered for naming of facilities
that serve the entire City.Individuals and organizations that have made
significant contributions to a particular area or neighborhood may be
considered for the naming of facilities that serve these areas or
neighborhoods within the City,including recreational and other amenities
within City parks.
Only a current Mayor or City Councilmember may nominate an individual
to have a City facility named in his or her honor,and the determination will
be made by the City Council.
City policy does not preclude additional opportunities for recognition that
may be created in the future.For instance,the Point Vicente Interpretive
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc
4-45
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 3 of 6
DRAFT POLICY:
It shall be the policy of the City Council to name City facilities in the following
manner:
•General
The policy of the City is to name facilities in a manner that will provide an
easy and recognizable reference to the City's residents and visitors.
•Geographic Location
Whenever possible,City facilities will be named for their geographic
location.The geographic location may be based on the identification of
the facility with a specific place,neighborhood,street,topographic or other
.natural feature,such as a drainage course, tree or plant species,or
historical precedent.
•Individual/Organizational Recognition
The naming of City facilities in honor of individuals or community
organizations will be a rare event,and will be considered under the
following conditions:The individual,a family or a community organization
has made exceptional contributions to the City,including one or more of
the following:a)financial gifts,b)public service as an elected official,
c)public service as a community volunteer,or d)long term sponsorship
agreements.
There should be a well-defined connection between the contributions of
the individual or community organization and the City facility.
The significance of the contribution from the individual/organizations
needs to be evaluated in relation to the impact of the City facility.
Individuals and organizations that have made contributions of regional or
community-wide significance may be considered for naming of facilities
that serve the entire City.Individuals and organizations that have made
significant contributions to a particular area or neighborhood may be
considered for the naming of facilities that serve these areas or
neighborhoods within the City,including recreational and other amenities
within City parks.
Only a current Mayor or City Councilmember may nominate an individual
to have a City facility named in his or her honor,and the determination will
be made by the City Council.
City policy does not preclude additional opportunities for recognition that
may be created in the future.For instance,the Point Vicente Interpretive
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 4 of 6
Center is planned to include exhibits that may be funded by individual or
corporate donations.Recognition of such donations may include a donor
wall within the Interpretive Center,or recognition of a contributor's
sponsorship of a specific exhibit.
It shall be the policy of the City Council to allow the placing of monuments and
other memorials on City properties under the following guidelines:
•Monuments
Monuments in memory of deceased persons may be permitted,in rare
cases,on City property with permission of the City Council under the
following conditions:
1.The person memorialized is closely associated with the area where
the monument will be located.The person memorialized is known
to,and revered,by a significant number of City residents.
2.The monument design is discreet and unobtrusive and designed to
blend into the surrounding area.A small plaque on a large rock (4
cubic feet)would be appropriate.The location of the monument
will be determined by City staff with approval of the City Council.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the monument will
be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The monument is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by
maintenance personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the
monument and may remove it at any time for any reason with
permission of the City Council.
•Benches or Trees
Benches or trees in memory of deceased persons may be placed in
City parks,or other City spaces,at the discretion of the City Manager
under the following conditions:
1.The bench design,or tree species,will be determined by the City
and the location of the bench or tree will be selected by the City.
2.No plaque,inscription or other written memorial information may be
placed on or near the bench or tree.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the bench or tree
will be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The bench,or tree,is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc
4-46
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 4 of 6
Center is planned to include exhibits that may be funded by individual or
corporate donations.Recognition of such donations may include a donor
wall within the Interpretive Center,or recognition of a contributor's
sponsorship of a specific exhibit.
It shall be the policy of the City Council to allow the placing of monuments and
other memorials on City properties under the following guidelines:
•Monuments
Monuments in memory of deceased persons may be permitted,in rare
cases,on City property with permission of the City Council under the
following conditions:
1.The person memorialized is closely associated with the area where
the monument will be located.The person memorialized is known
to,and revered,by a significant number of City residents.
2.The monument design is discreet and unobtrusive and designed to
blend into the surrounding area.A small plaque on a large rock (4
cubic feet)would be appropriate.The location of the monument
will be determined by City staff with approval of the City Council.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the monument will
be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The monument is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by
maintenance personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the
monument and may remove it at any time for any reason with
permission of the City Council.
•Benches or Trees
Benches or trees in memory of deceased persons may be placed in
City parks,or other City spaces,at the discretion of the City Manager
under the following conditions:
1.The bench design,or tree species,will be determined by the City
and the location of the bench or tree will be selected by the City.
2.No plaque,inscription or other written memorial information may be
placed on or near the bench or tree.
3.Costs of design,installation and maintenance of the bench or tree
will be determined by the City and borne by the requestor at the
discretion of the City.Only City personnel or City contractors may
perform work on City property.
4.The bench,or tree,is only a marker and is not a place of worship,a
cemetery or official gathering place.Flowers,and other
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 5 of 6
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by maintenance
personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the bench
or tree and may remove it at any time for any reason without
replacement.
It shall be the policy of the City Council to establish a "Wall of Honor"under the
following guidelines:
•Wall of Honor
The Wall of Honor will memorialize the names of distinguished community
leaders who have made substantial contributions to the City of Rancho
.Palos Verdes under the following conditions:
1.Persons nominated for the "Wall of Honor"shall have been dedicated
community leaders who have contributed significantly to the quality of
life offered by the City and realization of the vision expressed in the
original General Plan.The honoree must have had a significant
presence in the community throughout a good portion of their life and
should have made notable impacts on sustaining the quality of life of
the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes.
2.Persons nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"will be
deceased and will not have been previously honored by other actions
of the City such as facilities named in their honor or other memorial.
3.In order to maintain the significance of being named to the "Wall of
Honor"the number of names on the "Wall"will never exceed the
number of years the City has been incorporated.
4.Only a current Mayor of City Councilmember may nominate a citizen to
be included on the "Wall of Honor."The determination of the persons
who will be included will be made by the City Council.
5.The location of the "Wall"and the format of names and inscriptions
shall be established by the City Council.
BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to guide staff in the naming of City facilities,including parks and
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there have been no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc
4-47
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 5 of 6
memorabilia are not permitted and will be removed by maintenance
personnel.
5.The City is not responsible for damage or deterioration of the bench
or tree and may remove it at any time for any reason without
replacement.
It shall be the policy of the City Council to establish a "Wall of Honor"under the
following guidelines:
•Wall of Honor
The Wall of Honor will memorialize the names of distinguished community
leaders who have made substantial contributions to the City of Rancho
.Palos Verdes under the following conditions:
1.Persons nominated for the "Wall of Honor"shall have been dedicated
community leaders who have contributed significantly to the quality of
life offered by the City and realization of the vision expressed in the
original General Plan.The honoree must have had a significant
presence in the community throughout a good portion of their life and
should have made notable impacts on sustaining the quality of life of
the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes.
2.Persons nominated for inclusion on the "Wall of Honor"will be
deceased and will not have been previously honored by other actions
of the City such as facilities named in their honor or other memorial.
3.In order to maintain the significance of being named to the "Wall of
Honor"the number of names on the "Wall"will never exceed the
number of years the City has been incorporated.
4.Only a current Mayor of City Councilmember may nominate a citizen to
be included on the "Wall of Honor."The determination of the persons
who will be included will be made by the City Council.
5.The location of the "Wall"and the format of names and inscriptions
shall be established by the City Council.
BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has lacked a uniform policy to assist the City
Council and to guide staff in the naming of City facilities,including parks and
open space areas,buildings,streets and other public amenities.In addition,
there have been no formal policies or guidelines for honoring City leaders,nor for
memorializing persons whose loved ones simply want to provide a remembrance
in the form of a bench or tree.
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 6 of 6
Although the City has had no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in
honor of persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community
Center is named for a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former
Mayor and Council member and Vanderlip Park is named for an original
Peninsula landowner.There is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point named in
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.
The development of a Policy to guide the naming of City facilities,the permitting
of monuments,benches and trees is intended to enable these processes to be
conducted in an equitable,objective and consistent manner.In addition,the
establishment of a "Wall of Honor"will offer a new formal opportunity for honoring
community leaders.
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc 4-48
Policy for Naming Public Facilities
January 7,2003
Page 6 of 6
Although the City has had no formal policy for naming public facilities and sites in
honor of persons,there are precedents.Fred Hesse Park and Community
Center is named for a City founder,Robert Ryan Park is named for a former
Mayor and Council member and Vanderlip Park is named for an original
Peninsula landowner.There is a GPS monument at Portuguese Point named in
honor of Dr.Perry Ehlig.There is a trail below Ocean Terrace Drive known as
the McBride Trail in honor of the man who constructed it.There are also three
small memorials,one near Ladera Linda Community Center,one at the Point
Vicente Interpretive Center and the other near Inspiration Point that honor
persons who died prematurely.Finally,there have been numerous requests
from individuals to install park benches or plant trees in memory of deceased
loved ones,many of which have been granted.
The development of a Policy to guide the naming of City facilities,the permitting
of monuments,benches and trees is intended to enable these processes to be
conducted in an equitable,objective and consistent manner.In addition,the
establishment of a "Wall of Honor"will offer a new formal opportunity for honoring
community leaders.
P:\FINAL STAFF REPORTS-WEB SITE\2003\01072003 cc web agenda &reports\RPVCCA_SR_2003_01_07_15_facility
naming policy.doc
Excerpt City Council Minutes of January 7,2003
4-49
Excerpt City Council Minutes of January 7,2003
ious items/materials up and down the City Hall stairs.
Counc an McTaggart reiterated his concern with liability issues and th
elevator a ity Hall.
Councilman G diner stated that due to the possible future reloca·n of the City Hall
facilities,he may efer that the ADA improvements be made to 0 er facilities.
City Attorney Lynch e lained that the City has been syste atically going through its
list of priority projects fo DA improvements for the past veral years;and reiterated
the City's obligation to pu ue complete ADA complia e at all facilities.She briefly
addressed budgetary constr .ts and the impact it as upon making various ADA
improvements.
Councilman McTaggart reiterated
customer~who are not able to go up a
liability.
Mayor Stern highlighted Mayor pro t Ferra's strong feelings with regard to this
issue and suggested that since sh as not pre nt to discuss this matter,that this
matter be continued to a meeting erein Mayor pro Ferraro will be present.
Councilman Gardiner withdre is motion to accept staff r ommendation.
Councilman Clark reiterat his support for ADA improveme and compliance,but
highlighted the need for A compliance at other facilities within t City.
30TH Anniversary
Cit~Manager Ev ns presented staff report and the recommendation to tablish the
30 t Anniversa Celebration Committee and appoint City Council represen tive(s)to
the Committe .
Councilm n Clark suggested that Mayor pro tem Ferraro serve on the 30 th Annive a~
Celebr on Committee,stating that she did a wonderful job with helping to plan the
Anni\l rsary celebration.
M yor Stern suggested that he and Mayor pro tem Ferraro serve on the 30 th
nniversary Celebration Committee.No objection was noted.
~IiCY for Naming of Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments and Other
\~.~morials.(306 x 1201)
City Manager Evans presented staff report and the recommendation to adopt a policy
for the naming of public facilities and placing of monuments and other memorials on
City property.
It was the consensus of the City Council to delete Item No.2 (Benches or Trees)which
stated "No plaque,inscription or other written memorial information may be placed on
or near the bench or tree."
City Council Meeting
January 7,2003
Page 11 of 13
4-50
ious items/materials up and down the City Hall stairs.
Counc an McTaggart reiterated his concern with liability issues and th
elevator a ity Hall.
Councilman G diner stated that due to the possible future reloca·n of the City Hall
facilities,he may efer that the ADA improvements be made to 0 er facilities.
City Attorney Lynch e lained that the City has been syste atically going through its
list of priority projects fo DA improvements for the past veral years;and reiterated
the City's obligation to pu ue complete ADA complia e at all facilities.She briefly
addressed budgetary constr .ts and the impact it as upon making various ADA
improvements.
Councilman McTaggart reiterated
customer~who are not able to go up a
liability.
Mayor Stern highlighted Mayor pro t Ferra's strong feelings with regard to this
issue and suggested that since sh as not pre nt to discuss this matter,that this
matter be continued to a meeting erein Mayor pro Ferraro will be present.
Councilman Gardiner withdre is motion to accept staff r ommendation.
Councilman Clark reiterat his support for ADA improveme and compliance,but
highlighted the need for A compliance at other facilities within t City.
30TH Anniversary
Cit~Manager Ev ns presented staff report and the recommendation to tablish the
30 t Anniversa Celebration Committee and appoint City Council represen tive(s)to
the Committe .
Councilm n Clark suggested that Mayor pro tem Ferraro serve on the 30 th Annive a~
Celebr on Committee,stating that she did a wonderful job with helping to plan the
Anni\l rsary celebration.
M yor Stern suggested that he and Mayor pro tem Ferraro serve on the 30 th
nniversary Celebration Committee.No objection was noted.
~IiCY for Naming of Public Facilities and Placing of Monuments and Other
\~.~morials.(306 x 1201)
City Manager Evans presented staff report and the recommendation to adopt a policy
for the naming of public facilities and placing of monuments and other memorials on
City property.
It was the consensus of the City Council to delete Item No.2 (Benches or Trees)which
stated "No plaque,inscription or other written memorial information may be placed on
or near the bench or tree."
City Council Meeting
January 7,2003
Page 11 of 13
Mayor Stern stated that he would support the placement of small plaque no larger than
5 by 8 inches.
Les Chapin,6710 Verde Ridge Road,representing the Pacific View Homeowners
Association,commented on members of his homeowner association's involvement with
the development of lower Hesse Park and the homeowner association's interest in
erecting a plaque to recognize the three individuals who gave tirelessly to the efforts of
developing the lower Hesse Park area.He stated that the homeowner's association
would purchase and mount the plaque,suggesting that the plaque measure 12 by 16
inches,and noted their interest in having a small ceremony to mount the plaque.He
expressed his belief that the plaque should be larger than 5 by 8 inches.
Councilman McTaggart addressed the City's efforts to develop Hesse Park;and he
stated that the park had already been designed and the building plans had been altered
to alleviate the concerns of the neighbors.
Councilman Clark noted his support for the homeowner's association to work with the
Public Works Department in planning a tasteful plaque to recognize these efforts.He
addressed Councilman McTaggart's comments with regard to the development of this
park and the City's part in that development and stated that he would support a
background search to determine the responsible party(s)for the construction of this
park.
Councilman Gardiner questioned where the City would draw,its boundary.for
recognition plaques,pointing.out that there are many individuals in this community
deserving of recognition.He suggested that staff investigate how other cities recognize
its residents for their contributions to their cities.
Ms.Sunshine,6 Limetree Lane,advised that the California Coastal Conversancy Board
will soon be addressing this same topic for coastal zones;expressed her belief that
various trails within the City were named for no specific persons or entities -pointing
out that some trails are known by different names;and suggested that the Open Space
Planning,and Recreation and Parks Task Force be given the task of clarifying one
consistent names for each of the trails to clear up any misidentification.With regard to
the memorial rock located at Inspiration Point,she requested that the rock be removed
or relocated to a different site,stating that it does not look natural at its current location.
She added that the rock is a memorial to a child who lost their life in this area,but that
the rock is not located where the unfortunate incident happened.
It was the consensus of the City Council to allow plaques on benches.
Mayor Stern addressed his concern that there not be a proliferation of recognition or
memorial plaques all over the City;and stated that for this reason,he would be
favorable to a wall of honor for those who have made contributions to this City.
Councilman Clark stated that where appropriate,it would be acceptable to consider on
a case-by-case basis those who have made a significant contribution to the City.
It was the consensus of the City Council to support recognition plaques for both those
City Council Meeting
January 7,2003
Page 12 of 1,3
4-51
Mayor Stern stated that he would support the placement of small plaque no larger than
5 by 8 inches.
Les Chapin,6710 Verde Ridge Road,representing the Pacific View Homeowners
Association,commented on members of his homeowner association's involvement with
the development of lower Hesse Park and the homeowner association's interest in
erecting a plaque to recognize the three individuals who gave tirelessly to the efforts of
developing the lower Hesse Park area.He stated that the homeowner's association
would purchase and mount the plaque,suggesting that the plaque measure 12 by 16
inches,and noted their interest in having a small ceremony to mount the plaque.He
expressed his belief that the plaque should be larger than 5 by 8 inches.
Councilman McTaggart addressed the City's efforts to develop Hesse Park;and he
stated that the park had already been designed and the building plans had been altered
to alleviate the concerns of the neighbors.
Councilman Clark noted his support for the homeowner's association to work with the
Public Works Department in planning a tasteful plaque to recognize these efforts.He
addressed Councilman McTaggart's comments with regard to the development of this
park and the City's part in that development and stated that he would support a
background search to determine the responsible party(s)for the construction of this
park.
Councilman Gardiner questioned where the City would draw,its boundary.for
recognition plaques,pointing.out that there are many individuals in this community
deserving of recognition.He suggested that staff investigate how other cities recognize
its residents for their contributions to their cities.
Ms.Sunshine,6 Limetree Lane,advised that the California Coastal Conversancy Board
will soon be addressing this same topic for coastal zones;expressed her belief that
various trails within the City were named for no specific persons or entities -pointing
out that some trails are known by different names;and suggested that the Open Space
Planning,and Recreation and Parks Task Force be given the task of clarifying one
consistent names for each of the trails to clear up any misidentification.With regard to
the memorial rock located at Inspiration Point,she requested that the rock be removed
or relocated to a different site,stating that it does not look natural at its current location.
She added that the rock is a memorial to a child who lost their life in this area,but that
the rock is not located where the unfortunate incident happened.
It was the consensus of the City Council to allow plaques on benches.
Mayor Stern addressed his concern that there not be a proliferation of recognition or
memorial plaques all over the City;and stated that for this reason,he would be
favorable to a wall of honor for those who have made contributions to this City.
Councilman Clark stated that where appropriate,it would be acceptable to consider on
a case-by-case basis those who have made a significant contribution to the City.
It was the consensus of the City Council to support recognition plaques for both those
City Council Meeting
January 7,2003
Page 12 of 1,3
individuals living and deceased and that the plaques be permitted on benches and
trees.
Councilman Clark noted his support for recognizing those individuals who have made
significant contributions to the City.
Linda LoConte,6814 Kings Harbor Drive,treasurer of Pacific View Homeowner's
Association,advised that it has taken the homeowners association three years to get
this issue before the City Council;and stated that the members worked very hard with
staff to address the placement of a plaque of recognition for those who tirelessly
worked on bringing lower Hesse Park into development.
Mayor Stern explained for Ms.LoConte that their plans to erect a plaque for their
association members is not on the Agenda and stated that they will need to work with
staff to get this on the City Council Agenda for consideration ..
l Councilman McTaggart moved,seconded by Councilman Gardiner,to permit plaques
on trees and benches for those individuals who have made significant contributions to
the City.There being no objection,Mayor Stern so ordered.--ecess And Reconvene
tern recessed the meeting at 11 :12 P.M.and reconvened the meetin
/s/Douglas W.Stern
Mayor
ng was adjourned 11 :23 P.M.on motion of Councilm
Attest:
City Attorney Lyncli dvised that no action was take on the Agenda item;and
requested that the City uncil go back into closed ssion to discuss the upcoming
expiration period for the CI to file a lawsuit a .st the State Water Quality Control
Board,challenging the Board's
Councilman McTaggart moved,
Council go back into closed sessi
on the following roll call vote:
AYES:Clark,rdiner,McTaggart,
NOES:No
ABSENT:6 rraro (departed the meeting durin
ADJOURNM T:
/s/Jo Purcell
City Clerk
W:\2003 City Council Minutes\01072003 cc mins.doc
City Council Meeting
January 7,2003
Page 13 of 13
4-52
individuals living and deceased and that the plaques be permitted on benches and
trees.
Councilman Clark noted his support for recognizing those individuals who have made
significant contributions to the City.
Linda LoConte,6814 Kings Harbor Drive,treasurer of Pacific View Homeowner's
Association,advised that it has taken the homeowners association three years to get
this issue before the City Council;and stated that the members worked very hard with
staff to address the placement of a plaque of recognition for those who tirelessly
worked on bringing lower Hesse Park into development.
Mayor Stern explained for Ms.LoConte that their plans to erect a plaque for their
association members is not on the Agenda and stated that they will need to work with
staff to get this on the City Council Agenda for consideration ..
l Councilman McTaggart moved,seconded by Councilman Gardiner,to permit plaques
on trees and benches for those individuals who have made significant contributions to
the City.There being no objection,Mayor Stern so ordered.--ecess And Reconvene
tern recessed the meeting at 11 :12 P.M.and reconvened the meetin
/s/Douglas W.Stern
Mayor
ng was adjourned 11 :23 P.M.on motion of Councilm
Attest:
City Attorney Lyncli dvised that no action was take on the Agenda item;and
requested that the City uncil go back into closed ssion to discuss the upcoming
expiration period for the CI to file a lawsuit a .st the State Water Quality Control
Board,challenging the Board's
Councilman McTaggart moved,
Council go back into closed sessi
on the following roll call vote:
AYES:Clark,rdiner,McTaggart,
NOES:No
ABSENT:6 rraro (departed the meeting durin
ADJOURNM T:
/s/Jo Purcell
City Clerk
W:\2003 City Council Minutes\01072003 cc mins.doc
City Council Meeting
January 7,2003
Page 13 of 13