RPVCCA_CC_SR_2013_08_06_01_Annual_Conformance_Resolution_LAC_Congestion_Mgmt_Program
PUBLIC HEARING
Date: August 6, 2013
Subject: Adoption of Annual Conformance Resolution Certifying Compliance
with the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program
(CMP)
Subject Property: Citywide
1. Declare the Hearing Open: Mayor Brooks
2. Report of Notice Given: City Clerk Morreale
3. Staff Report & Recommendation: Associate Planner Kim
4. Public Testimony:
Appellants: N/A
Applicant: N/A
5. Council Questions:
6. Rebuttal:
7. Declare Hearing Closed: Mayor Brooks
8. Council Deliberation:
9. Council Action:
1-1
CITY OF
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
REVIEWED:
Project Manager:
HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
JOEL ROJAS, COMMUNIT~yaPMENT DIRECTOR
AUGUST 6, 2013 u ....
ADOPTION OF ANNUAL CONFORMANCE RESOLUTION
CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOS ANGELES
COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEM~NfJPROGRAM
CAROLYN LEHR, CITY MANAGER ux____
So Kim, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2013-_, thereby adopting the City's 2013 Local Development
Report (LOR) and self-certifying the City's conformance with the Congestion Management
Program (CMP) for Los Angeles County.
BACKGROUND
A Congestion Management Program (CMP) was enacted by the State Legislature in 1990
to improve traffic congestion in California's urban areas. In accordance with the State
statute, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) [then known
as the L.A. County Transportation Commission (LACTC)] adopted the first CMP for Los
Angeles County on November 18, 1992.
The MTA has updated and adopted several Congestion Management Programs since
1992. The City and other L.A. County local jurisdictions were originally required to
demonstrate compliance with the MTA's Congestion Management Program (CMP) using a
debit/credit system. The debit/credit system was abolished in 2003 because the MTA
began studying the concept of instituting a traffic mitigation fee to address regional
congestion. Until adoption and implementation of a possible congestion mitigation fee,
cities are required to continue the current practice of adopting an annual self-certified
conformance resolution and self-certifying the City's conformance with the CMP
requirements. As such, the City's 2013 Local Development Report (LDR), which reports
1-2
information on new net development in our City within the 2012-2013 fiscal year, is being
presented to the City Council for approval along with a resolution certifying the City's
compliance with the County's Congestion Management Program. Upon adoption, the
resolution and 2013 LOR will be transmitted to the MTA for its review and approval.
DISCUSSION
In adopting the attached self-certification resolution, the City resolves that it is in
conformance with all the applicable requirements of the CMP and has taken, or will take,
each of the following four specific actions (the requisite action appears in bold type and the
City's response in normal type):
1. By June 15, of odd numbered years, the City will conduct and transmit to the MTA
traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections,
consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway
System Chapter.
On June 14, 2013, the Public Works Department transmitted to MTA, the results of the
biennial highway monitoring performed at the intersection of Western Avenue and
Toscanini Drive, in accordance with the requirements of the CMP (see attached).
2. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a Transportation
Demand Management (TOM) Ordinance, consistent with the minimum
requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter.
On February 2, 1993, the City Council adopted the required TOM Ordinance (Municipal
Code Chapter 10.28) and Staff continues to implement the TOM Ordinance, where
applicable. As part of the Development Code Amendment proceedings, completed in May
1997, the TOM Ordinance was incorporated into the Development Code by reference.
3. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis
program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land
Use Analysis Program Chapter.
On September 17, 2002, the City Council adopted an amended set of Local CEQA
Guidelines, which incorporated the County's CMP Land Use Analysis program into the
City's environmental review procedures. City staff continues to implement the land use
analysis program where applicable.
4. The City has adopted a 2013 Local Development Report consistent with the
requirements identified in the CMP. The LOR tracks new development, exempted
development, and development adjustments as a result of building permits
issued between June 1, 2012 and May 31, 2013.
During the period between June 1, 2012 and May 31, 2013, there were building permits
issued for 7 new single family units and permits issued for the demolition of 7 single-family
1-3
units, resulting in a net increase of 0 residential units in the City during the 12-month
monitoring period. There were no permits issued for new non-residential square footage.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Earlier this year, MTA Staff completed a sub-regional nexus study and prepared an MTA
Board report recommendation on the establishment of a Congestion Mitigation Fee in
association with the CMP. The study concluded that a fee program would be feasible,
would provide effective mitigation and a new source offunding with local control, and would
comply with the statutory requirements of the CMP and the California Mitigation Fee Act.
As proposed, the mitigation fee would be based on the daily trip generation of a new
project (it is estimated that a new single family residence would generate a fee of about
$1,800). The mitigation fee would be paid by a project applicant to the local jurisdiction at
the time the local jurisdiction issues a building permit. None of the fee revenue collected
by the City would go to the MT A. The pool of money collected by the City could then be
used by "the City to construct projects that help reduce traffic congestion, such as
bicycle/pedestrian improvements that provide accessibility to bus/rail transit, signal
synchronization, transit stop improvements, arterial enhancements etc. At this time,
consideration of the fee is anticipated to be addressed by the MTA Board at its February
2014 Board meeting. If the Mitigation fee program is adopted by the MTA Board, local
jurisdictions will have at least 2 years to adopt an ordinance to assess/collect the fees.
Staff has recently been advised by the MTA that in June 2013, the MTA Board directed
MTA Staff to work with their legislative delegation to conduct a hearing as to whether the
CMP is still an appropriate and useful program. The MTA Board also directed MTA Staff to
report back to the Board any state findings and legislative changes to the CMP statute, in
consultation with the business and environmental communities, local jurisdictions and
SCAG and report back with MTA Staff's findings to the Board no later than the February
2014 MTA Board meeting.
CONCLUSION
The City Council, through a noticed public hearing, must adopt a self-certification
conformance resolution, whereby the City agrees to conform to the local responsibilities
required by the CMP, including preparation of the 2013 LOR. As documented in this Staff
Report, the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the CMP and has
taken all of the required actions of the Deficiency Plan. Therefore, Staff recommends that
the City Council adopt attached Resolution No. 2013 -_.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
There are no fiscal impacts related to this request.
ATTACHMENTS
• City Council Resolution No. 2013-
• Draft 2013 Local Implementation Report
1-4
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FINDING THE CITY OF
RANCHO PALOS VERDES [LOS ANGELES COUNTY] TO BE IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 65089.
WHEREAS, CMP statute requires the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (LAC MT A), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for
Los Angeles County, to annually determine that the County and cities within the County
are conforming to all CMP requirements; and,
WHEREAS, LACMTA requires submittal of the CMP Local Development Report
· by September 1 of each year; and,
WHEREAS, on July 4, 2013, after notice published pursuant to the provisions of
the Development Code, the City Council held a public hearing, at which time all
interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: That the City of Rancho Palos Verdes [Los Angeles County] has
taken all of the following actions and is in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the 2010 CMP adopted by the LACMTA Board on October 28,, 2010 ..
By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes [Los
Angeles County] will conduct annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for
selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP
Highway and Roadway System chapter.
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes [Los Angeles County] has locally adopted and
continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent
with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand
Management chapter.
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes [Los Angeles County] has locally adopted and
continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum
requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program chapter.
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes [Los Angeles County] has adopted a Local
Development Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the
requirements identified in the 2010 CMP. This report balances traffic congestion
impacts due to growth within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes [Los Angeles County]
with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes [Los Angeles County] is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide
Deficiency Plan consistent with the LACMT A Board adopted 2003 Short Range
1-5
Transportation Plan.
Section 2: That the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes [Los
Angeles County] shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy
of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of August 2013.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )ss
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES )
I, Carla Morreale, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the
above Resolution No. 2013-was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said
City Council at a regular meeting held on August 6, 2013.
City Clerk
1-6
CITY OF Rf\NCHO f:JALOS VERDES
PUBLIC vvor~l<S DEPARTMENT
June 14, 2013
Ms. Stacy Alameida
CMP Manager
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
One Gateway Plaza MS 99-23-2
Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952
Subject: 2013 Congestion Management Program
Dear Ms. Alameida:
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby transmits the results of our biennial highway
monitoring, collected in accordance with the requirements of the Congestion Management
Program. The enclosed Level of Service calculations are summarized as follows:
Intersection Date Peak Hour V/C Ratio LOS
Western Avenue & 04-25-13 7:15-8:15 AM 0.860 D
Toscanini Drive 05-02-13 7:15-8:15 AM 0.855 D
AM Peak Hour Average 0.858 D
04-25-13 4:30-5:30 PM 0.679 B
05-02-13 4:00-5:00 PM 0.670 B
PM Peak Hour Average 0.635 B
1f you have any questions, please contact Ms. Nicole Jules, Senior Engineer, at (310) 544-5252.
Sincerely,
~~
lnterim Director of Public Works
Enclosure
Copy: Nicole Jules, Senior Engineer
30040 HAWlHOl<N[ BOULfV/\Rf) / l~ANCHO I ~\I OS VFRDES. CA 90275-5391 I (310) 544-5252 / F.'\X (~110) 544-5292 I WWWP!\LOSVFRrlts.crn,1mrv
f)RINTED ON RECYCLED PAPEF1
1-7
INTERSECTION LAYOUT
Intersection: Western Avenue and T oscanint Drive
Date: 5/2/20 I 3
CMP Monitoring Station No: 128
Western Avenue
T oscamm Drive
--------... 'A.
NOTE: ~ NB LAGGING LEFT TURN
PHASE
North
5~
KEY:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1' ,
6
1. --------''A. Lane functions as separate turn lane though not striped
2.
NO TURN ON RED
........ _______ _
i 4
+--
i 7 8 ____..
1-8
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION CAJ,CULATION SHEET
Intersection: Western Avenue and Toscanini Drive
Count Date: 4/25/2013 Peak Hour: 7:15 -8:15 AM
Analyst: J.L. Agency: City of Rancho Palos Verdes
CMP Monitoring Station: 128
Number VIC Critical
Movement Volume of Lanes Ratio Movements
NB Left 184 0.115
NB Thru 1485 2 0.464 x
58
SB Left 24 x
833 2
EB Left 80 0 0 0.000
EB Thrn 19 1600 0.062
EB Right 315 1 1600 0.197 0.197 x
WB Left 92 0 0 0.000
WB Thru 42 I 1600 0.084 0.084 x
Sum of Critical V /C Ratios
Adjustment for Lost Time
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU)
Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below
A
1. Per lane Capacity 1,600 VPH B
2. Dual turn lane Capacity 2,880 VPH c
3. Intersection Type: 4-Way x D
T E
SplitN/S F
Split E/W (defacto)
Note: Since the EB LT and WB LT are far greater than the EB and WB Thrus, the EB-WB directions act as defacto
split phases. Since the EB RT V/C is far greater than the EB Thru/L T VIC, the EB RT is the critical movement.
Total
0.479
0.281
0.760
0.100
0.860
D
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
n/a
1-9
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION CALCULATION SHEET
Intersection: Western Avenue and Toscanini Drive
Count Date: 5/2/2013 Peak Hour: 7:15 -8: 15 AM
Analyst: J.L. Agency: City of Rancho Palos Verdes
CMP Monitoring Station: 128
Number VIC Critical
Movement Volume of Lanes R tio Movements Total
NB Left 187 0.117
NB Thru 1503 2 0.470 0.470 x
45
0.482
19
874
EB Thru 1600 0.063
EB Right 281 1600 0.176 0.176 x
,,..,h\~.,~'1>%f,.~~r%~ .. -,;~~;?."':.;~:: ·, 0.273
WB Left 102 0 0 0.000
WBThru 53 0.097 x
Sum of Critical VIC Ratios 0.755
Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100
Intersection Ca aci Utilization (ICU) 0.855
Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below D
A 0.6
1. Per lane Capacity 1,600 VPH B 0.7
2. Dual tum lane Capacity 2,880 VPH c 0.8
3. Intersection Type: 4-Way x D 0.9
T E 1.0
SplitN/S F n!a
Split E/W
1-10
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION CALCULATION SHEET
Intersection: Western Avenue and Toscanini Drive
Count Date: 5/2/2013 Peak Hour: 7:15 -8:15 AM
Analyst: J.L Agency: City of Rancho Palos Verdes
CMP Monitoring Station: 128
Number VIC Critical
Movement Volume Ratio Movements
NB Left 187 0.117
NB Thru 0.470 0.470 x
0.028
0.012 0.012 x
0.273
22 1600 0.063
281 1600 0.176
102 0 0 0.000
Sum of Critical V /C Ratios
Adjustment for Lost Time
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU)
Level of Service (LOS)-Refer to table below
A
1. Per lane Capacity 1,600 VPH B
2. Dual turn lane Capacity 2,880 VPH c
3. Intersection Type: 4-Way x D
T E
SplitN/S F
Split E/W ( defacto)
Note: Since the EB LT and WB LT are far greater than the EB and WB Thrus, the EB-WB directions act as defacto
split phases. Since the EB RT VIC is far greater than the EB Thru/L T V/C, the EB RT is the critical movement.
Total
0.482
0.273
0.100
0.855
D
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
LO
n/a
1-11
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION CALCULATION SHEET
Intersection: Western Avenue and Toscanini Drive
Count Date: 5(2/2013 Peak Hour: 4:00 -5:00 AM
Analyst: J.L. Agency: City of Rancho Palos Verdes
CMP Monitoring Station: 128
Number V/C Critical
Movement Volume of Lanes Ca acity Ratio Movements Total
NB Left 63 1600 0.039 0.039 x
NB Thru 2 3200 0.389
0.495
EB Thru 1600
EB Right 1 1600 0.037 0.037 x
-";·.·o;,t;-.:1,&'-/'/;Jtill? 0.075
WB Left 0 0 0.000
1 1600 0.038 0.038 x
Sum of Critical VIC Ratios 0.570
Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.670
Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below B
A 0.6
I . Per Jane Capacity 1,600 VPH B 0.7
2. Dual tum lane Capacity 2,880 VPH c 0.8
3. Intersection Type: 4-Way x D 0.9
T E l.O
SplitN/S F n/a
Split E!W
1-12
CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
626.447.4171
www.ctcounters.com
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: WesternTosc
: 00000000
: 4/25/2013
: 1
r.
··.-. ·_··.······ --· W~ter-n A-,-,e ·-· Tosc~~f~~;J>.rinted-Unshincd Western Ave Toscanini Dr
1 __ ... Southbound ·westbound • Nortl1bou11d ! Eastbound
Sta1t Time • ...... Left . Thr..u..L .. B.i!!ht L~tt ' · Th_rul _Ri"ht_·····.······"LcfiT-Ti;~·l······-R;gj;t[-___ !.._el_l ___ j Thru · ·· r{· ht I J t T 1 ·
o7:ooAM: 1 121 5 s o '-09: .. 12 26s -21 ·11· ··2.L-~r··n, ~~a2,
07:15AM' 5 167 4 15 5 17; 43 363 1i 16 4 41· 687
07:30AMi 2 203 4 30 16 17 73 400 &i 23 3 1061 885
07:45 AM i _ _]___ . 1.4'1 .J.. _lQ_ 18 56 395 25 i 18 9 114 948
·················-····Total I-·· 15 740 21 83 ····--39--184 ·· 1423 --42T·· 74 18 ---z&ll 29s2
08:00 AM 10 214
08:1SAM 5 218
08:30 AM 13 211
08:45 AM .... _1_2______ 226 _ ············-·----·f\i!-;;11-40 869
5 17 3 11 I 12 327
7 9 I 9i 7 336
l1 14 0 I~ I 12 339
) .... .... E ... _2 ___ .LL ... 1.49
25 57 6 -43! 42 1251
18 ! 23 3
8 i 14 3
8 i 19 3
2 ! 12 4 ....... 36:--68-------13··
54 703
12 629
14 649
. ····· 14 ___ _ifil_
94 2544
04:00 PM 16 331 10 I 9 IJ 25 277 15 ! 7 3 w~ "' 04:15 PM 8 367 10 17 2 6 16 287 13 I 5 2
_it ....... m 04:30 PM 6 323 I! ; 15 3 7 17 297 :tL 7 5
04:45PM 13 394 ---~---···lL. +-2~ ............. !L .. _ ....... ..lQ.i ....... __1_ 4
Total I 43 1415 52 I 52 69 1165 56 ! 20 14 73 29'>3
05:00PM 12 354 13 I 13 ' _j ~ 245
10 9 2
10 I
705
05:15 PM ! 12 387 131 6 s 4 16 293 12 4 0 18 770
05:30PM I 5 310 II 13 1! ---jI -~~ ---JH -· 19 ll 2 18 699
05:45 PM 14 366 14 I 14 __ JQ. .............. _Q_ __ ...£_ 16' . __ _Ill_
Total 1-----;j3-1417 51 i 46 51 30 6 -----62T 2946
Grand Total 141 4441 149 238 71 163 371 4953 1851 192 51 510 ' 11465
Apprch % 3 93.9 3.1 50.4 15 34.5 6.7 89.9 3.4 25.5 6.8 67.7
Total% 1.2 38.7 1.3 2.1 0.6 1.4 3.2 43.2 1.6 l.7 0.4 4.4
1-13
CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
626.447.4171
www .ctcounters.com
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: WesternTosc
: 00000000
: 4/25/2013
:2
Viestern Ave -T-o-sc_a_n-in_i_D_r_··---:----···-·-"-,e-st-er-nA~-; --············-. -T-os-c-ani_u_i D_r ____ ]
~---r~So=u=thbound i Westbound i Northbound Eastbound sli1rt Time -~!tLD]JU. LRi.g.!rt.LAPRlEl.!!.LL_.!&!Ll . Turn I _..!~iWLC--;;;:r;;.;-tJ;:eftT1:h.~TR.i!ifu.J~A=p=p~1:u=';=-1-~_~Le='ft"---1 --"'rhr""-'""'u--'[-"'R:,ig-,ht~I -Ap-,-,-o,.-, lrm. Total .
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to I 1 :45 AM -Peak 1 of l
Peak !lour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM i 5 167 4 176 i 15 17 37 43 363 7 413 16 4 41 61 I 687
07:30 AM [ 2 203 4 209 I 30 16 17 63 73 400 8 481 23 3 106 132 _ 885
07:45 Al\-l [ 7 249 8 264 30 18 19 67 56 395 25 476 18 9 114 141 i 948
08:00 MtJ __ lQ. _.llL_ __ 5 ___ 229 ~1~7 __ ~3~-~1~7 ___ 2=034~7-+1,. ___ 18~142~_1~43=28~57 ____
5
1_8
8
___ .
17
3
2
5
7
7 ~23~--1~93 __ 3=5145~.
4
8
14
0 i,1 :'
2
7
2
0
3
3
Total Volume i 24 833 21 878 92 42 70 80 ~ '.'ta_~Ql~Lf-2.1_ -'ML ____1A_ ---j-4-'-"s=.1--···--_ __1Q,6 ---·· _l__'l~--__ !_JQJ _M__J_tL______ _ t'Ll _4,9 .......... 16.1 ____ L
.... PHF .. 600 .839 ,(jsf>. .~}J _,.7.f;JL ~ill_. ,2_41_ .761 l .630_ ~--lfilL.~89~8~~-~87~0-._ .. ,?JL_~§2L .... ,n4J _,~Q
Western Ave
Q\il,, . In _I0Jal OJ?J.!.ii L •• pz&l L.2s:ul
:-·-··--·--'··-····· --·1
L21Le_3-3LW
Righl Thru Left .-J . 4 ...
Peak Hour Data
1"
I
North
1 1 i rt
Left Thru ~ wM:l Hehl~~
i
i__izE_QJ L_ mil L2!l6?:!
Out In Total ,., __ , ___ . ,,_
I
1-14
CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
626.447.4171
www.ctcounters.com
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: WesternTosc
: 00000000
: 4/25/2013
:3
-···········wcstcrnAvc ·····························L· ·· · ·· T~~~~~i;~i-o;:------i-----WesternAv~--r--Toscanini Dr I
,___ si~1.;n;n~b-:_~~;11J~i~~L~EP.:r.Q'"' 1 Left 1-:ffu;(<!~itTA;;.:I~;i;' L .. J£~.L ~:~1~~r:1~1TA~;;~;;+·Lf_nf-~Ji;;:1 ~~~j:l!t .. Appig~J _r_11t TQ1~1
Peak Hour Analysis From J2:00 PM to 05:45 Ptvl -Peak l of I
Peak II our for Entire lnters<ction Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 6 323 11 340 15 3 7 25 l 17 297 10 324 7 5 20 32 I 721
04:45 PM 13 394 21 428 ' J I 3 5 19 11 304 18 333 l 4 21 26 i 806
05:00 PM 12 354 13 379 13 5 9 27 23 245 JO 278 9 2 lO 21 705
....... 05:15 PM_ ......... l.L ____ l~.Z ................ lL ..... 412 __ 6 ____ 5 ____ 4 ___ __ll_ J.6 _f:&_ ___ 12 321 _ _i_ ____ __Q ___ J_lL_ ___ ....... 22, ....•.. 779. .. .
;;.~p~~~~::~ 7~~-1;;~ ""'"' ;~ m 1559 524; 18 1~ -dL Umm~P ._s~~-1;~~ ··-5-~-·•••' '.~~~J m~~~ -IOI~ •-6 &~L-101 1: 3002
PHF .827 .925 .690 m_j?J_l_ mm ,75()m ,$QQ m.§24-m .796 I .728 .. ~9JL ... li2:L.m ~2il..: .583 .550 .821 ,_,,!~.9 ... ·--_ _,2JJm
Western Ave
,-9_\)L [-1n._, rIQl~i,;,
L. .. llllSJ .15.S-9J U11.4J ________ _L ___________ __
r···-'' ~ L._56., H58L ...... A3,
RilJht Thru Left
+-1 l 4
Peak Hour Data
i
North
l Peai<Hour8e9iils at o4.3o P~
JJns.hilie.L __ _ _ _ ... )
•1 l ~
11,."llzr-W~
1-15
r· I
L .. ······.-j_ I. ·-S..tmt Time .
07:00AM
07:15 AM
07:30 AM
. Q7.:45AM.
Total
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
08:30 AM
. ..!)$:45 AM
Total
04:00 PM
04:15 PM
04:30 PM
04:45 PM I ...................... -Total [
05:00 PM I
05:15 PM
05:30 PM I
.. Q,?.:;fSi-':~1 1--
Grand Total
Apprcb %
Total%
6
5
II
2
24
9
12
7
II
39
8
13
8
261
183
232
239
915
341
365
364
389
1459
336
348
399
........ -12_ . _ill_.
41 1445
120 4571
2.5 94.5
I 38.9
CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
626.447.4171
www.ctcounters.com
5
11 !
7
2
25
10:
16 I
16
12
6
·············-·····2.. ...
43
_JL
14
8
JO
. _1.L.
43 47 I
2
... _ __Q__
4
2
3
7
_5_
17
2 "j 8 ......... i~ ... _:;_ __ 4
IO
....... L
51 . 45 18
144 224 93
3 46.4 19.3
1.2 l.9 0.8
19
10
10
8
47
7 1:
15 .
7! "361-·
3!
11 I
41
12
16
II
·············-···.?.. 47
12
20
15
_.Hi. ...
63
33
22
15
322
385
345
)32
1284
3l0
296
327
.... JU.
1244
278
302
284
..... ..... ..2.L_._...l!L.-_._1.2.L
23 I 90 1114
166
I
395 5123
34.4 6.9 90
1.4 3.4 43.6
IO
7
7
9 ..
33
171
10
gi
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
18
14
20
2
2
1
!.4 . ........ .. ... }
66 8
11 8
9 3
9 3
: WesternTosc 2
: 00000000
: 5/2/2013
: 1
351 13
15
70
707
659
667
....... 533
2566
752
765
785
15
50
................... <!... -· _Q ...
II.
16
14
18
59
.... ~0$
3110
16
7•
14:
...... JQ.j_
53 l
175
3.1
l.5
33 20
11 3 161 726
8 I 15 I 756
7 8 12 78 l
.................. 6 ......•....••• ....1._. ____ 12...\_ ....... ......l?J ..
28 14 62 • 2984
209
28.7
1.8
64
8.8
0.5
455
62.5
3.9
11739
1-16
, \Vestern Ave [-
,__ ____ : ____ ,5outhbound I
L ...... Sl\V1.Jin1e .... L Left •__Thrg_J _fu_g\11 J ~~P"TQt!Ll .... J&f!. ..
CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
626.447.4171
www.ctcounters.com
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: WesternTosc 2
: 00000000
: 5/2/2013
:2
Toscanini Dr -·· 1 Western Ave Toscanini Dr ······------,
Westbound .. i. Northbound Eastbound i
Thru I Right I Apr Toi.I i ·L~ftf l:h;;:;[gig~t.: ,.\pp. fo1_a1_· Lell J _ _]!IBJ Right 1·;;:;~·1:;;;;;;-1-1.rt.T;i~i-J
Peak Hour Analysis From 07 :00 AM to 11 :4 5 AM -Peak 1 of I
Peak Hour for Entire lnters~ction Bcgi11s at 07: 15 AM ,
07;15AM 4 172 7 183 I 19 8 17 44 ! 45 382 to 437. 18 4 37 59; 723
07:30 AM 4 191 3 198 : 30 18 15 63 ; 71 398 7 476 . 20 6 107 133 , 870
07:45 Ari.1 5 250 6 261 i 37 26 19 821 59 401 18 478 i 23 to 102 135 : 956
·T;;~~s~~~u~1~ Jt--m 2~ --~I~-L-1~}--tl----To-2;~ 1g l;~; !~ 1~~H-~~ 2~ --723~.6~ _· ___ -,i~ l--··········3i~~
% App. Total ... ___ f.,J_ -~?AL. 2.3 _ , 45.3 23.6 -1.LL_ __ , l 0,1~ _ 86.Q. _ --1,Q___ --j--1!U__ ~5~.8-~~ _
. _l't!F .792 ___,fill_-12Q__ _ _MQJ___@_'L_ _ J.!!L _ Jl.fL ___ ,@li . _ .658 ....lfil_ .625 __ 90]_ $_5_9 __ J_~Q _,g?..L. __ ,791 . ., .... c85L
Western Ave
d:~_!J:~1 .... :~~
i I
LiiJ_§&:':i9J
Right Thru Left •·; ! 4 ....
Peak Hour Data
t
North
~ i r•
Left Thru Right
r.-;uizl_1suaL 1 4sJ
Li~~--~-~W.f!ZJ
Ou! In Total
1-17
CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
626.447.4171
www.ctcounters.com
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: WesternTosc_2
: 00000000
: 5/2/2013
:3
l~ --st~,i-ri1~~e --1----~&it r~~~t;~~:_L~_::~l.-1-;fi_I ~f::;.r~~:-~~.~~-~~;-t----L~-fil Western Ave . Toscanini Dr
Northbound i Eastbound I
n;~r R.TgJ;!~l'T£•~ir-·1.-~fiT--rb;;;J RightL,\rn r~;.1 \ 1~t.Tor;;Jl
Peak Hour J\nalysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM -Peak I of I
Peak Hour fm· Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM -9 341 lO 360 ii 14 2 7 23 I 12 310 17 339 ll 8 11 30 752
04:15 PM 12 365 16 393 ! 8 3 7 18 i 20 296 10 326 9 3 16 28 765
04:30l'M 7 364 6 377! 10 7 15 32l 15 327 8 350 9 3 14 26 785
___ M..::15 PM ,__ _ __ l l_~ __ _lL _________ 1!i_L _____ l_l _________ 5__ _ __ 7 -------~----16 ii~! _________ ~~-d-;t-~-_
3
;-_ lg-~~ 28 808
__ ~:.~p~~~~~aL i:r_ 1:t_: ~-1545 Li4~:-~ 3/~------9-~1 __ ;~-91.7 3_7 _______ f2L-11.L __ 2_J_ llil-3Ti0
_ __ ....E!-J.EJ____Jill_ ~-__ ]_~--_931 1 .76~------•. 6.97 .. ___&QQ_---2iQ.J___;z~s ___ . ..2~L _ .u.~-.969 r .1_~_L __ ~@_ _ __,fil_L __ --~[ .266_
!-------···-----~-" --. . ......... ······················--
Western Ave
: QJ!L" I~ JQ!fil. ,-1ai3J ... lR!l.QJ L..2.(tS_fil
!
Peak Hour Data
t
North
lhiit! ci;:;r6e9i-ns at o4:oo P~
e.tL _________________________________ l
i
:······· ·········-------
1-18
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared: July 10, 2013
2013 CMP local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012 -MAY 31, 2013
Contact: So J. Kim, Associate Planner
Phone Number: (310) 544-5228
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
2013 DEFICIENCY PLAN SUMMARY
*IMPORTANT: All "#value!" cells on this page are automatically calculated.
Please do not enter data in these cells.
DEVELOPMENT TOTALS
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Group Quarters
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Commercial {less than 300,000 sq.ft.)
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Lodging
Industrial
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.)
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.)
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
Medical
Government
Institutional/Educational
University(# of students)
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT TOTALS
Exempted Dwelling Units
Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
Dwelling Units
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Daily Trips
I
0.00
0.00
0
0
I
2. Net square feet is the difference between new development and adjustments entered on pages 2 and 3.
Page 1
1-19
ENTER JURISDICTION NAME
2013 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012 -MAY 31, 2013
Date Prepared: July 10, 2013
Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "O."
PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category Dwelling
Units
Single Family Residential 7.00
Multi-Family Residential 0.00
Group Quarters 0.00
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Lodging 0.00
Industrial 0.00
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00
Medical 0.00
Government 0.00
Institutional/Educational 0.00
University(# of students) 0.00
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description Daily Trips
(Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter "O" if none
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
Page 2
1-20
ENTER JURISDICTION NAME
2013 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012 -MAY 31, 2013
Date Prepared: July 10, 2013
Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "O."
PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed-only for 1) development permits that were both
issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any
structure with the reporting period.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category Dwelling
Units
Single Family Residential 7.00
Multi-Family Residential 0.00
Group Quarters 0.00
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Lodging 0.00
Industrial 0.00
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00
Medical 0.00
Government 0.00
Institutional/Educational 0.00
University(# of students) 0.00
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description Daily Trips
(Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter "O" if none
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00
Page3
1-21
ENTER JURISDICTION NAME Date Prepared: July 10, 2013
2013 CMP Local Development Report
Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012 -MAY 31, 2013
Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "O."
PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
(NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS)
LowNery Low Income Housing
High Density Residential
Near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments
Near Rail·Stations
Development Agreements Entered
into Prior to July 10, 1989
Reconstruction of Buildings
Damaged due to "calamity"
Reconstruction of Buildings
Damaged in Jan. 1994 Earthquake
Total Dwelling Units
Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
Exempted Development Definitions:
ol
ol
~I
~I
~I
~I
0
0
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units
1,000 Gross Square Feet
Dwelling Units
1,000 Gross Square Feet
Dwelling Units
1,000 Gross Square Feet
Dwelling Units
1,000 Gross Square Feet
Dwelling Units
Page4
1. LowNery Low Income Housing: As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development as follows:
-Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
-Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger
station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under
the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre
is automatically considered high density.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: Mixed-use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger
station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high
density residential housing.
4. Development Agreements: Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section
65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destroyed,
to the extent of> or= to 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity.
6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and
where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locally
precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LDR.
1-22