Loading...
RPVCCA_CC_SR_2014_08_19_I_Approving_Speed_Limit_SurveysCITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS MICHAEL THRONE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS t/O AUGUST 19, 2014 ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2014-XXX APPROVING CERTAIN SPEED SURVEYS AND ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE SURVEYS ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS (SUPPORTS 2014 CITY COUNCIL GOAL #1, PUBLIC SAFETY AND TRAFFIC ISSUES -FOCUS ON TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT) REVIEWED: CAROLYNN PETRU, ACTING CITY MANAGER~ Project Manager: Nicole Jules, Deputy Director of Public Works i\q) RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Approve to retain the existing 15 mph speed limit, when children are present on Bayend Drive from General Street to Crestwood Street, on General Street from Crestwood Street to Bayend Drive and on Crestwood Street from Upland street to Bayend Drive; Retain the existing 40 mph speed limit on Crenshaw Blvd from Sea Crest Drive to Crest Road; Retain the existing 45 mph speed limit on Crenshaw Blvd from Crest Road to the Rolling Hills Estates City boundary; Retain the existing 45 mph speed limit on Crest Road from Hawthorne Blvd to Crenshaw Blvd and from Palos Verdes Drive East to Ganado Drive; Retain the existing 40 mph speed limit from Ganado Drive to the Rolling Hills City Boundary north of Paseo de Pino; Retain the 40 mph speed limit on Crestridge Road from Crenshaw Blvd to Highridge Road; Retain the existing 35 mph speed limit on Forrestal Drive from Palos Verdes Drive South to the terminus north of Pirate Drive; Retain the existing 35 mph speed limit on Granvia Altamira from Hawthorne Blvd to the Palos Verdes Estates City Boundary north of Monero Drive; Retain the 45 mph speed limit on Hawthorne Blvd from Palos Verdes Drive West to Highridge Rd/Grayslake Rd.; Retain the 40 mph speed limit on Hawthorne Blvd from Highridge Rd/Grayslake Rd to Indian Peak Rd.; Retain the 45 mph on Hawthorne Blvd from Silver Spur Rd to the Rolling Hills estates City Boundary; Increase the existing 25 mph Truck Traffic speed limit to I-1 40 mph in the northbound direction only on Hawthorne Blvd from Silver Spur Rd to the Rolling Hi11s Estates City Boundary; Increase the existing 25 mph Truck Traffic speed limit to 35 mph in the southbound direction only on Hawthorne Blvd from Rhone Drive to Palos Verdes Drive West; Retain the 35 mph speed limit on Highridge Road from Hawthorne Blvd to the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary south of Peacock Ridge Road; Retain the 35 mph speed limit on Miraleste Drive from Palos Verdes Drive East to the Los Angeles City Boundary south of Suana Drive; Retain the 35 mph speed limit on Montemalaga Drive from Silver Spur Road to the Palos Verdes Estates City Boundary west of Grayslake Road; Retain the 35 mph speed limit on Palos Verdes Drive South from 1,500 feet east of Seacove Drive to 1,300 feet west of Schooner Drive; Retain the 40 mph speed limit on Palos Verdes Drive South from 1300 feet west of Schooner Drive to the Los Angeles City Limit; Retain the 25 mph speed limit on Ridgegate Drive from Hawthorne Blvd to Highridge Road; Retain the 35 mph speed limit on Via Vicente/Calle Entradero from Palos Verdes Drive West to Palos Verdes Drive West; 2. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2014-XXX APPROVING CERTAIN SPEED SURVEYS AND ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE SURVEYS ON VARIOUS STREETS WITHIN THE CITY. BACKGROUND To satisfy the requirements of Section 40802(b) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. The surveys must be conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The existing speed zone surveys for certain segments of Crenshaw Boulevard, Crest Road, Cestridge Road, Forrestal Drive, Granvia Altamira, Hawthorne Boulevard, Highridge Road, Miraleste Drive, Montemalaga Drive, Palos Verdes Drive South, Ridgegate Drive, Via Vicente/Calle Entradero were last surveyed in 2007. These surveys must be updated periodically (every 5 or 7 years, depending upon specific criteria) to ensure the speed limits reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code. Willdan Engineering conducted and prepared the Engineering and Traffic Surveys and a copy is included as an attachment to this report. The Traffic Safety Committee, at its August 26, 2013 meeting, voted to support the consulting traffic engineer's recommended speed limits. It's important to note that as a result of the updated survey, the currently posted truck speed limit on Hawthorne Blvd will increase from 25 miles per hour to 40 miles per hour in the northbound direction from Silver Spur Road to the Rolling Hills Estates City boundary and to 35 miles per hour in the southbound direction from Rhone Drive to Palos Verdes Drive West. The posted speed limits for truck traffic can only be enforced and substantiated with a valid Engineering and Traffic Survey. Willdan conducted the survey in accordance with the California Vehicle Code Section 22407 and has provided a detailed explanation in the attached August 5, 2014 Technical Memorandum on Truck I-2 Speed Zone Engineering and Traffic Survey. If the City Council chooses to adopt the consulting traffic engineer's recommendation to increase the truck speed limits accordingly, supplemental truck speed warning signs can be erected to advise truck drivers of downhill and reduced-speed conditions. Attachment D contains examples of applicable truck warning signs. DISCUSSION The State of California requires municipalities to update speed zone surveys every 5 years with an option to extend to 7 or 10 years, depending on certain circumstances. Section 627 of the CVC requires that Engineering and Traffic Surveys be conducted based on the methodology mandated by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Specific procedures for conducting Engineering and Traffic Surveys are contained in Sections iB.13 through 28.18 of the California MUTCD. Speed limits set by these procedures are enforceable by radar. Radar enforcement appears to be the only reasonable method of enforcement as the City's roadway configurations (narrow width, quryature, steep grades, non-vehicular uses) does not lend itself to other means of speed enforcement like pacing vehicles. Therefore, any speed zone that is not based on the California MUTCD procedures would have the following consequences: ~ Radar enforcement could not be utilized, potentially compromising safety by restricting the ability to control clearly unreasonable driving behavior; ~ Speed zones set artificially low would make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful" and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic; ~ Speed limits set higher than the prevailing speed are not considered reasonable and safe. CONCLUSION Having defensible speed zone surveys supported by the courts would allow continued radar enforcement of the posted speed limit by the issuance of citations. Therefore, staff recommends approving the updated speed zone surveys conducted by Willdan Engineering and adopting Resolution No. 2014-XXXX APPROVING CERTAIN SPEED SURVEYS AND ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE SURVEYS ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS. ALTERNATIVES Staff has not identified viable alternatives to the recommended action since the speed surveys were properly prepared in accordance with federal and state guidelines. Therefore, staff does not believe it is beneficial to re-survey the identified roadways. FISCAL IMPACT Adopting staff's recommendation will not result in an impact to the FY14-15 budget. Attachments: I-3 Attachment A: Attachment 8: Attachment C: Attachment D: Resolution No. 2014-XXX Engineering and Traffic Survey, Willdan Engineering Willdan's Truck Speed Zone Technical Memorandum Examples of Truck Warning Signs I-4 ATTACHMENT A I-5 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING CERTAIN SPEED SURVEYS AND ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE SURVEYS ON VARIOUS STREETS WITHIN THE CITY. WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 22358.4, 22407 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, engineering and traffic surveys have been conducted on various streets within the City by the City's Consulting Traffic Engineer in accordance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code, including Section 627 of said Co~e; and WHEREAS, the report and recommendations of the City's Consulting Traffic Engineer and the speed surveys that were conducted were presented for review and qoncurrence by the City's Traffic Safety Committee, which has recommended approval thereof to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the report and recommendations of the City's Consulting Traffic Engineer and the speed surveys that were conducted by the Traffic Engineer for the street segments that are set forth in bold on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto as and incorporated herein by this reference, were presented for review and approval by the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes at a duly noticed meeting thereof on August19,2014;and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the establishment of speed limits that are reasonable and safe will facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic within the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Speed limit is established on the following streets in accordance with Section 15.32.010 and 15.32.020 of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Traffic Ordinance adopted pursuant to Section 10.04.010 of the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code: ROAD SURVEYED Bayend Drive 09/25/13 LIMITS 15 mph, when children are present, on Bayend Drive from General Street to Crestwood Street. I-6 Crenshaw Boulevard 09/25/13 Crenshaw Boulevard 09/25/13 Crest Road 09/25/13 Crest Road 09/25/13 Crest Road 09/25/13 Crestridge Road 09/25/13 Crestwood Street 09/25/13 Forrestal Drive 09/25/13 General Street 09/25/13 Granvia Altamira 09/25/13 40 miles per hour on Crenshaw Boulevard from Sea Crest Drive to Crest Road. 45 miles per hour on Crenshaw Boulevard from Crest Road to the Rolling Hills Estates City boundary. 45 miles per hour on Crest Road from Hawthorne Boulevard to Crenshaw Boulevard. 45 miles per hour on Crest Road from Palos Verdes Drive East to Ganado Drive. 40 miles per hour on Crest Road from Ganado Drive to the Rolling Hills City Boundary north of Paseo de Pino. 40 miles per hour on Crestridge Road from Crenshaw Boulevard to Highridge Road. 15 mph, when children are present, on Crestwood Street from Upland Street to Bayend Drive 35 miles per hour on Forrestal Drive from Palos Verdes Drive South to the terminus of Forrestal Drive north of Pirate Drive. 15 mph, when children are present, on General Street from Crestwood Street to Bayend Drive 35 miles per hour on Granvia. I-7 Altamira from Hawthorne Blvd to the Palos Verdes Estates City Boundary north of Monero. Drive. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Palos Verdes Drive West to Vallon Drive. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Vallon Drive to Crest Road. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Crest Road to Eddinghill Drive/Seamount Drive. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Eddinghill Drive/Seamount. Drive to Highridge Road/Grayslake Road. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 40 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Grayslake Road/Highridge Road to Indian Peak Road. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Silver Spur Road to the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 40 miles per hour-Truck traffic in northbound direction only on Hawthorne Boulevard from Silver Spur Road to the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 35 miles per hour -Truck traffic in southbound direction only on Hawthorne Boulevard from Rhone Drive to Palos Verdes Drive West. I-8 Highridge Road 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Highridge Road from Hawthorne Boulevard to the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary south of Peacock Ridge Road. Indian Peak Road 06/09/11 40 miles per hour on Indian Peak Road from Crenshaw Boulevard to Rolling Hills Estates City Limits. Miraleste Drive 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Miraleste Drive from Palos Verdes Drive East to Via Colinita. Miraleste Drive 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Miraleste Drive from Via Colinita to the Los Angeles City Boundary south of Suana Drive. Montemalaga Drive 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Montemalaga Drive from Silver Spur Road to the Palos Verdes Estates City Boundary west of Grayslake Road. Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 40 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Palos Verdes Drive South to a point 2,900 feet north of Palos Verdes Drive South. Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 40 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Palos Verdes Drive South to Ganado Drive. Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Ganado Drive to Diamante Lane Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Diamante Lane to Miraleste Drive. I-9 Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Miraleste Drive to Bronco Drive Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Bronco Drive to the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary north of Sunnyside Ridge Road Palos Verdes Drive South 09/25/13 40 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive South from 1300 feet west of Schooner Drive to the Los Angeles City Limit. Palos Verdes Drive South 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive South from 1,500 feet east of Seacove Drive to 1,300 feet west of Schooner Drive. Palos Verdes Drive South 06/09/11 45 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive South/Palos Verdes Drive West from Hawthorne Blvd to 1,500 feet east of Seacove Drive. Palos Verdes Drive West 06/09/11 45 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive West from Hawthorne Blvd to North City Limit Ridgegate Drive 09/25/13 25 miles per hour on Ridgegate Drive from Hawthorne Blvd. to Highridge Road. Silver Spur Road 06/09/11 35 miles per hour on Silver Spur Road from the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary north of Elkmont Drive to the Rolling Hills Estates City boundary south of Silver Arrow Drive. Via Vicente/Calle Entradero 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Via Vicente/Calle Entradero from Palos Verdes Drive West to Palos Verdes Drive West. I-10 Section 2. All previous resolutions and orders establishing speed limits on these roadways within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes are hereby amended to reflect these speed limits. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to file certified copies of this resolution with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office. Section 4. The speed limits established in Section 1 of this resolution shall become effective upon posting of the speed limit signs. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this __ day of _____ 2014. Mayor Attest: City Clerk State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) ss City of Rancho Palos Verdes ) I, Carla Morreale, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 2014-_, was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on August 19, 2014. City Clerk I-11 ATTACHMENT B I-12 September 25, 2013 Ms. Nicole Jules Senior Engineer City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275-5391 Subject: 2013 Engineering and Traffic Survey Dear Ms. Jules: As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and update the posted speed limits along 27 street segments in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. These segments were last surveyed in 2007, and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City's arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices. The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012, and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Rancho Palos Verdes and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study. Very truly yours, WILLDAN Enclosure Engineering I Geotechnical I Enviranmental I Sustainabffity I Financ:ia1 I Homeland Security 562.908.6200 I 800.499.4484 I fax: 562.895.2120 I 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405, Industry, CA 91746-3443 I www.willdan.com I-13 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . .. .... ... ... . ... ..... ..... . .. . .. . ... .... . . . .... ... . . . . .. . ... .. . ..... .... ...... .... .. 1-2 Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Suivey ......... .... .. .. .. .. ...... .. .... .. .. .. 2-3 SURVEY CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 4 Survey Locations....................................................................................... 4 Data Collection .. . . .... .. .. .. . .... ..... ... . ... ....... .. . ... .. . .. ...... .. . . .... ... .. . .. . ... ..... .. . ....... 4 Speed Data............................................................................................ 4 Collision Data......................................................................................... 5 Field Review Data.................................................................................. 5 ANALYSIS................................................................................................... 6 Criteria........................................................................................................ 6 Results and Recommendations................................................................. 6-7 Table 1-Segments With Recommended Speed Changes......................... 7 Table 2-Summary of Recommendations................................................... 8-9 Segments with Special Conditions .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. 1 0-13 LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES.................................................................... 14 Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code......................................... 14-20 APPENDIX A -Segment Data Street Segment Sheets Radar Speed Distribution Forms APPENDIX B -Collision Rates APPENDIX C -Suivey Equipment Used Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-14 INTRODUCTION This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. This Engineering and Traffic Survey presents recommended speed limits for 27 street segments in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. These surveys must be updated every 5 or 7 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012. The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Sheriff's Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic . Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City's police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)]. Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 1 0 years If a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(ll)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current. The Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Code further describes three elements of an engineering and traffic survey: 1. Measurement of prevailing speed; 2. Accident history; and 3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist. Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states that 11 No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.11 The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions. 1 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-15 The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers. Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion. Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement. ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are discussed in more detail as follows: Speed Sampling Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 851h percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed, except as shown in the two options below. Options: 1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 851h·percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. 2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 851h·percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 851h percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f). 2 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-16 If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5 The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria: A. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 851h percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E& TS. B. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 851h percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E& TS. C. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 851h percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied. Collision History Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than average rate of collisions. A segment that has an above-average collision rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists. A summary of the collision rates for the 27 surveyed street segments is provided in Appendix B. Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. It is important to note that The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. 3 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-17 SURVEY CONDITIONS SURVEY LOCATIONS The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following: 1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence. 2. Minimum visibility restrictions. 3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways. 4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle. DATA COLLECTION Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic -eollisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 27 locations during the months of September and October 2012. Speed Data Radar speed measurements were conducted at 27 locations during September and October 2012. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments. 4 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-18 Collision Data Collision data was obtained from the City's SWITRS electronic collision database. For this study, collision data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 201 O. The collision rates for the 27 segments are expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the collision rate: R = Axl,000,000 tx365 days xlxv year A = Number of midblock collisions over time period R =Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles) t = Time Period Covered (in years) I= Length of Segment (miles) v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic) The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate. The average statewide collision rates were obtained from 2009 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans. Field Review Data A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors: 1. Street width and alignment (design speed); 2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics; 3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns; 4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking; 5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices; 6. Visibility obstructions; 7. Land use and proximity to schools; 8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage; 9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and 10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver. 5 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-19 ANALYSIS CRITERIA Survey data was complied and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012. Some of the criteria used are: A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful, 11 and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The "basic speed limit" is the nearest 5 mph increment to the a5th percentile speed. B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed. C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average collision rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 2. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless an collision rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report. The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions. The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to· be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie 6 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-20 No speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California Vehicle Code). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions. Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limits and Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments. TABLE 1 STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES STREET FROM TO EXISTING NEW CHANGE TRUCK SPEED ZONE ON DESCENDING GRADES 23 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 24 HAWTHORNE BLVD RHONE DR PALOS VERDES DR WEST 7 25 40 INCREASE 25 35 INCREASE Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-21 1 CRENSHAW BLVD SEACREST DR CREST RD 40 41 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 2 CRENSHAW BLVD CREST RD RHE CITY LIMIT 45 47 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 3 CRESTRD HAWTHORNE BLVD CRENSHAW BLVD 45 47 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 4 CRESTRD PALOS VERDES DRE GANADO DR 45 44 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 5 CRESTRD GANADO DR RH CITY LIMIT 40 41 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 6 CRESTRIDGE RD CRENSHAW BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD 40 43 40 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 7 FORRESTAL DR PALOS VERDES DRS NORTH TERMINUS 35 37 35 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 8 GRANVIA ALTAMIRA HAWTHORNE BLVD PVE CITY LIMIT 35 37 35 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 9 HAWTHORNE BLVD PALOS VERDES DR W VALLON DR 45 49 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 10 HAWTHORNE BLVD VALLON DR CREST RD 45 49 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 11 HAWTHORNE BLVD CREST RD EDDINGHILL DR 45 48 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 12 HAWTHORNE BLVD EDDINGHILL DA HIGHRIDGE RD 45 46 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 13 HAWTHORNE BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD INDIAN PEAK RD 40 46 40 * 14 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVERSPURRD RHE CITY LIMIT 45 5? 45 * 15 HIGHRIDGE AD HAWTHORNE BLVD AHE CITY LIMIT 35 39 35 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 16 MIRALESTE DR PALOS VERDES DRE VIA COLINITA 35 38 35 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 17 MIRALESTE DR VIA COLINITA LA CITY LIMIT 35 40 35 * 18 MONTEMALAGA DR SILVER SPUR RD PVE CITY LIMIT 35 39 35 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 19 PALOS VERDES DR S 1,300' W/O SCHOONER DRLA CITY LIMIT 40 44 40 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 20 PALOS VERDES DR S1,500' E/O SEACOVE DR 1,300'W/OSCHOONER DR 35 41 35 * * See "Segments with Special Conditions• Section for Comments ** = 25 mph when children are present Engineering and Traffic Survey 8 City of Rancho Palos Verdes I - 2 2 21 RIDGEGATE DR HAWTHORNE BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD 22 VIA VICENTE/CALLE ENTRAOEAO PALOS VERDES DR W PALOS VERDES DR W TRUCK SPEED ZONE ON DESCENDING GRADES 23 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 24 HAWTHORNE BLVD RHONE DR PALOS VERDES DR W 'EDUCED SCHOOL ZONE SPEED UMITS 25 BAYEND DR GENERAL ST CRESTWOOD ST 26 CRESTWOOD ST UPLAND ST BAYENDDR 27 GENERAL ST CRESTWOOD ST BAYENDDR *See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments 9 25 32 35 36 25 44 25 40 15 NIA 15 NIA 15 NIA 25 35 40 35 15 15 15 * CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED * * * * * Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I - 2 3 SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more below the critical speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Each segment is discussed below. Segment #13 -Hawthorne Boulevard -Highridge Road to Indian Peak Road This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 34,599 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial and residential. The critical speed is 46 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves and moderate bicyclist traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It Is recommended that the spee~ limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #14-Hawthorne Boulevard -Sliver Spur Road to Rolling Hills Estates City Limit This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 25,222 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and a high school. The critical speed is 52mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity among adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons. Segment #17 -Miraleste Drive -Via Colinita to Los Angeles County Boundary This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 12,371 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, moderate bicyclist traffic and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity among adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It Is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #20-Palos Verdes Drive South -1,5001 E/O Seacove Drive to 1,300' W/O Schooner Drive This segment Is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 12,201 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and undeveloped land. The critical speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, moderate bicyclist traffic and a steep downgrade that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It Is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. 10 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-24 Segment #21 -Ridgegate Drive -Hawthorne Boulevard to Highridge Road This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1, 721 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is multi-unit residential. The critical speed is 32 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, a vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 25 mph for the above reasons. Segment #23 -Hawthorne Boulevard -Sliver Spur Road to Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary (Truck Speed Zone) Section g2407 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit for trucks on downgrades based on the finding of an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The CA MUTCD specifies the requirement for an Engineering and Traffic Survey for truck speed zones on descending grades in Section 28.13: the segment should have a recorded Incident history of runaway commercial vehicles; a physical profile showing length · and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs or more will be provided. This segment is currently posted at 25 mph for the truck speed zone and has two through lane in each direction separated by a raised median with an ADT of 125,222 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential with Palos Verdes Peninsula High School at Silver Spur Road. Between the subject limits, the vertical downgrade to the south rages from 1.5%-5.5%. The survey was originally initiated in 2006 by a serious accident involving a commercial vehicle losing control in the northbound direction within the subject limits. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, a vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit for the northbound direction be posted at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #24 -Hawthorne Boulevard -Rhone Drive to Palos Verdes Drive West (Truck Speed Zone) Section 22407 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit for trucks on downgrades based on the finding of an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The CA MUTCD specifies the requirement for an Engineering and Traffic Survey for truck speed zones on descending grades in Section 28.13: the segment should have a recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles; a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs or more will be provided. This segment is currently posted at 25 mph for the truck speed zone and has two through lane and a bicycle lane in each direction separated by a raised median with an ADT of 16,241 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential with Ryan Park, City hall and the commercial development near Palos Verdes Drive West. Between the subject limits, the vertical downgrade to the south rages 11 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-25 from 2%-9%. The survey was originally initiated in 2007 by a serious accident involving a commercial vehicle losing control in the southbound direction within the subject limits. The critical speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, a vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian and bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit for the southbound direction be posted at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #25 -Bayend Drive -General Street to Crestwood Street (Reduced School Zone) This segment is currently posted at 15 mph for the reduced school zone and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 934 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit near schools to 15 miles per hour for a distance of less than 500 feet from or passing a school building or ground. This can be applied If the segment has· two traffic lanes; a maximum posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour immediately prior to and after the school zone and is located within a residential area. Furthermore the CA . MUTCD states the 85th percentile speed is not used to set the reduced or .extended school speed limit. Since this segment has two traffic lanes, is located in· a residential neighborhood and has a posted 25 mph speed limit prior to and after the school zone it qualifies for the reduced speed in school zone. Furthermore there ls moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the reduced speeds in school zones remain at 15 mph for the above reasons. Segment #26 -Crestwood Street -Upland Street to Bayend Drive (Reduced School Zone) This segment is currently posted at 15 mph for the reduced school zone and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,460 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit near schools to 15 miles per hour for a distance of less than 500 feet from or passing a school building or ground. This can be applied if the segment has two traffic lanes; a maximum posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour immediately prior to and after the school zone and is located within a residential area. Furthermore the CA MUTCD states the 85th percentile speed is not used to set the reduced or extended school speed limit. Since this segment has two traffic lanes, is located in a residential neighborhood and has a posted 25 mph speed limit prior to and after the school zone it qualifies for the reduced speed in school zone. Furthermore there is moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the reduced speeds in school zones remain at 15 mph for the above reasons. 12 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-26 · Segment #27 -General Street-Crestwood Street to Bayend Drive (Reduced School Zone) This segment is currently posted at 15 mph for the reduced school zone and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,768 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit near schools to 15 miles per hour for a distance of less than 500 feet from or passing a school building or ground. This can be applied if the segment has two traffic lanes; a maximum posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour immediately prior to and after the school zone and Is located within a residential area. Furthermore the CA MUTCD states the 55th percentile speed is not used to set the reduced or extended school speed limit. Since this segment has two traffic lanes, is located in a residential neighborhood and has a posted 25 mph speed limit prior to and after the school zone it qualifies for the reduced speed in school zone. Furthermore there is moderate pedestrian traffic th~t may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the reduced speeds in school zones remain at 15 mph for the above reasons. 13 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-27 LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code: Section 627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey, "as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall Include, among other requirements deemed n~cessary by the department, consideration of all of the following: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records. (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, In addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following: (1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district: a. Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon Is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures. b. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. c. The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B). (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Basic Speed Law 22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and In no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. Speed Law Violations Section 22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not In excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prlma facle speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facle unlawful unless the defendant 14 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-28 establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing. Prima Facie Speed Limits Section 22352. (a) The prlma facle limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof: (1) Fifteen miles per hour: A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the Immediate approach of a railway train or car. B) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the Intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the Intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an Intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. C) On any alley. (2) Twenty-five miles per hour: A) On any highway other than a state highway, In any business or residence district unless a different speed ls determined by local authority under procedures set forth In this code. (B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facle limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL• warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to itto pay for the erection of those signs. (b) This section shall become operative on March 1, 2001. 15 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-29 Increase of Local Speed Limits to 65 Miies Per Hour Section 22357. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25 mile per hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366. · Decrease of Local Limits Near Schools or Senior Centers Section 22358.4 (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever Is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey. (2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows: (A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour. (B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, 16 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-30 contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prlma facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions: (A) A maximum of two traffic lanes. (B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prlma facie speed limit Immediately prior to and after the school zone. (3) The prima facle limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel. (4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration. (5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance Is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (8) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1 ), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1 ), school warning signs Indicating a speed limit of 25 miles .per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds. (D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs Incurred by the department under this subdivision. Downward Speed Zoning Section 22358.5. It is the Intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions. Boundary Line Streets Section 22359. 17 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-31 With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within dHferent jurisdictions. Decreasing Truck Speed Limits Section 22407 Whenever the Department of Transportation or local authority determines upon the basis of engineering studies and a traffic survey that the speed of 55 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe for vehicles mentioned in subdivision (a) of Section 22406 which have a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or more, in descending a grade upon any portion of a highway, the department or local authority, with respect to highways under their respective jurisdiction, may determine and declare a speed limit of 50,45,40,35,30,25 or 20 miles per hour, whichever Is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and Is reasonable and safe, which declared speed limit shall be effective for such vehicles when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway. Speed Trap Prohibition Section 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speedtrap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used In securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code. Speed Trap Section 40802. (a) A "speed trap" Is either of the following: (1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined In order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prlma facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b)(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage and federal-aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration, except that when these maps have not been submitted, or when the street or road is not shown on the maps, a "local street or road" means a street or road that primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions: 18 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-32 (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet. (B) Not more than one-half mile of a uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. (2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (c)(1) Wt)en all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable: (A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C)(I) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic suivey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406. (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2) A "speed trap" is either of the following: (A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph 19 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-33 (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects: (I) Except as specified In subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. Speed Trap Evidence Section 40803. -(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person In any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence ls based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speedtrap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facle case, that the evidence or testimony presented Is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802. (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802. 20 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-34 APPENDIX A Street Segment Data Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-35 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CRENSHAW BLVD LIMITS: SEA CREST DR TO CREST RD City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G:J SCHOOL K 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN -s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK - \fl PARK ~ N.T.S. DISTANCE I 0.4 miles ALIGNMENT I Rolling with horizontal curve. PARKING RESTRICTIONS I Parking allowed on both sides. STREET WIDTH I 38' -64' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN I One lane in each direction. Raised center median between Crest Rd and Valley View Rd, changing to skip yellow centerline. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) I Concrete or asphalt sidewalk on both sides. Concrete or AC C&G on both sides. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT I WIS is a backup residential, view area and a park. EIS is backup residential, undeveloped, with church and school at Crest Dr. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1,742 (October 2012) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 27, 2012. Midblock of Sen Clemente and Seacrest Dr. AVERAGE SPEED: 37 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 41 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 32-41 MPH 3-YEARACCIDENTDATA: 1/1/08to 12131/10 I TOTALMID-BLOCKACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBO, DRUNK. H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reason. I - 3 6 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CRENSHAW BLVD LIMITS: CREST RD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT (RHE) City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9125113 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: - MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 42 MPH Crestridge Rd I RPV Preschool and Klndergarden Palos Verdes 6 ~ Art Center Ill f 48 L!J ,.. ~b ·····~,ef>~~<l ' \ ~ ~ N.T.S. , ~ ~ t!J ~ Sal 0.8 miles Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade to the north. Parking allowed on both sides, except for west-side between Silver Spur Rd and Crestridge Rd. 82' Two lanes in each direction with a median. NIB direction at a lower elevation than the SIB direction between Crest Rd and Crestridge Rd. Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on EIS. Sidewalk on WIS between Crest Rd and Indian Peak Rd. Undeveloped and backup residential. Preschool on SN/ comer at Indian Peak Rd. Art Center on SN/ comer at Crestridge Rd. 20,473 (September 2012) September 26, 2012. Midblock of Crest Rd. and Crestridge Rd. CRITICAL SPEED: 47 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 39-48 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEDING: 2 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 E Q. ACCIDENT RATE: 0.11 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percenble speed is 47 mph and would nonnally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons. I - 3 7 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CREST RD LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BLVD TO CRENSHAW BLVD City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ MAP SYMBOLS ~ . ~ GJ SCHOOL ~I.I Cresta Verde Dr § I ~~~ 5 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL .siP I 45" R1-1 I f:: R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN lid 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN ~ -m s SCHOOL CROSSWALK ID E 0 CROSSWALK I J 40 I~ W13-1 SPEED WARNING ~ SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN N.T.S. DISTANCE 1.6 miles ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Stopping Anytime on both sides, Hawthorne Blvd to Crenshaw Blvd. STREET WIDTH 80' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes and bike lanes in each direction separated by a raised center median; numerous tum pockets. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter on both sides. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential, undeveloped; Commercial on S/W comer of Whitley Collins Dr,; Calif. Water Co E/O Highridge Rd on N/S. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 10,368 (September 25,2012) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012. At Whitley Collins Dr. AVERAGE SPEED: 47 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 47 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 43-52 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 0 NO. WISPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBO, DRUNK. H&R: 0 t a. • r ., I ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 47 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons. I - 3 8 LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR EAST TO GANADO DR Traffic Engineering Survey I STREET: CREST RD 1 1 x I City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1 DATE: 9125/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G:l SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK 30 t-W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 38 MPH Marymount ~ College-:# G:l ~~ • • ~· 0.8 miles 45~ Si7ZI!!? N.T.S. Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. Parking allowed on both sides. 64' Two lanes in each direction separated by double yellow center1ine. School Zone Concrete C&G on both sides. Sidewalk on the WIS bit Lucania Dr and Ganado Dr and on EIS bit PVDE and Starline Dr. Backup and fronting residential on the EIS. Undeveloped, backup residential and school on the WIS. 3,047 (September 2012) September 26, 2012. Midblock of Decania Dr. and Deluna Dr. CRITICAL SPEED: 44 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 34-43 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08to12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 1 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 a ACCIDENT RATE: 0.37 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.00 ACCIDENTS PER .MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted spead llmlt. It is recommendad that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason. I - 3 9 Traffic Engineering Survey I STREET: CREST RD I City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25113 I I ;:[ LIMITS: GANADO DR TO ROLLING HILLS CITY BOUNDARY N OF PASEO DE PINO ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G:l SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK 30 t-W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 36 MPH a.Smiles oe-~; ~"'e(\~ Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. No Stopping Any Time on both sides from 200 ft N/O Ganado Dr to north city limit 30'-52' ................. ~,., ~~ E7?ZI!! N.T.S. Two lanes in each direction to 200 ft N/O Ganado Dr, then one lane in each direction separated by RPM centerline. on 707(September25,2012) September 26, 2012. 1,500 ft north of Ganado Dr. CRITICAL SPEED: 41 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 33-42 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1108 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ... .. ! f & ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limH. It is recommended that the speed limH remain at 40 mph for the above reason. I - 4 0 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CRESTRIDGE RD LIMITS: CRENSHAW BL VD TO HIGHRIDGE RD City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9125/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G:J SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS {SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 39 MPH ,/ , 0.5miles ~ ,/ q..~~ ,' <P Rolling with slight horizontal curves. N.T.S. ,.I Palos Verdes ~ •• Art School l:.!1111 4llllllr' <a ~ 1!$+.. ~ 0- Parking allowed on both sides. Red, white, blue curb marking in front of Peninsula Community Church. 64' One lane in each direction with a two-way left-tum lane. Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on SIS; SW on N/S bit Highridge Rd and 950 ft W/O Crenshaw Blvd. Backup school and assisted living. Intermittent religious and undeveloped lots. PV Art Center at Crenshaw Blvd. 6,917 (October 2012) September 25, 2012. Church in front of school. CRITICAL SPEED: 43 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 34-43 MPH 3-YEARACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08to12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 4 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 1 ~ ACCIDENT RATE: 1.06 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 43 mph and would nonnally justify a 45 mph posted speed limil However, Option 2 of the 2012 catlfomla MUTCD methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for tha above reason. I - 4 1 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: FORRESTAL DR LIMITS: PALOS VEDES DR SOUTH TO NORTH TERMINUS City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK \fl PARK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS {SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK {DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 33 MPH 0.3 miles Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. Parking allowed on both sides. 40' One lane in each direction; skip yellow centerline. Ladara Linda Community Center and Montessori School of RPV Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on the west side; none on the east side. \ ' ~ \"Q.z,...>. \~ ~ ~ -~ t, UI E?Zl!!S:u N.T.S. Backup residential on east side; Fronting residential N/O PVDS and school/community center N/O Pirate Dr on west side. 1,416 (September25, 2012) September 27, 2012. Midblock of PVDS and Pirate Dr. CRITICAL SPEED: 37 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 29-38 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08to12/31/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 1 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 i ~ = i ACCIDENT RATE: 2.15 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason. I - 4 2 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: GRANVIAALTAMIRA LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BL TO PALOS VERDES ESTATES CITY BOUNDARY•' City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ " '\ - MAP SYMBOLS G:l SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE I 0.2 miles --~~ N.T.S. ALIGNMENT I Downgrade to the north with horizontal curve. I I ' R1-1 •.1 I -.-.,R1-1, ' •• PARKING RESTRICTIONS I Yellow, Red, and Green curb on the east side. Red and Green curb on the west side. STREET WIDTH I 60' -64' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction separated by a raised median from 280 ft to 700 ft N/O Hawthorne Blvd. Raised median from Moreno Dr to 70 ft IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on both sides. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT I Backup residential. Commercial on both sides at Hawthorne Blvd. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 9,402 (September 2012) SPEED CHECK (DA TE/LOC) September 26, 2012. 100 ft south of Moreno Dr. AVERAGE SPEED: 34 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 37 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 29-38 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ~ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 37 mph and would nonnally justify a 35 mph posted speed &mil It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason. I - 4 3 Traffic Engineering Survey I STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR WEST TO VALLON DR City of Rancho Palos Verdes I DATE: 9125/13 MAP SYMBOLS 0 SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN -45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN -s SCHOOL CROSSWALK I N.T.S. CROSSWALK -- \fl PARK 35 ~ W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE I 1.0 mile ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: City Hall Note : Hawthorne Blvd is· considered a north/south roadway for the purpose of this study ALIGNMENT I Horizontal curve with steep downgrade to the south. PARKING RESTRICTIONS I No Parking Anytime on both sides. No Stopping Anytime at Via Rivera on w/s. STREET WIDTH I 80' -88' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN I Two lanes and bike lane in each direction separated by a raised median. ":<: Scenic Tum-Out IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) I Concr9te c&G on both sides. SW on EIS bit PVDW to 350' N/O Via Capri, WIS bit PVDW and Via Rivera and 380' S/O Vallon Dr, both skies. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT I Backup residential on WIS. Multi-unit on EIS V18 Rivera. Non-fronting Civic and educational on EIS near CH. Commercial at PVDW. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 15,265 (September 2012) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. City Hall driveway. AVERAGE SPEED: 45 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 49 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 4o-49 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.12 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 49 mph and would nonnally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit However, Option 2 of the 2012 Cslifomia MUTCD methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. H is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason. I - 4 4 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: VALLON DR TO CREST DR City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN -s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK -- \fl PARK 40 ~ W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN 1.0mile Los Verdes Golf Course Alta Vista Or Rolling with steep downgrade at south end of segment Horizontal curves. No Parking Anytime on both sides. 80' Duoree Dr andYalkm Dr. saz l!!!!Sss N.T.S. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Conaete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on the WIS and 11fl S/O Dupree Dr EIS at bus stop. lntennittent path on the EIS. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential. Multi-unit residential S/O Los Verdes Dr on the WIS. Commercial on the WIS at Crest Rd. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 16,241(September 2012) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. Los Verdes Or. AVERAGE SPEED: 45 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 49 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 40-49 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MIO-BLOCK ACC: 3 NO. W/SPEEDING: 1 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 1 [ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.17 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 49 mph and would nonnally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason. I - 4 5 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: CREST RD TO EDINGHILL DR. City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: , MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN -s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK -- \fl PARK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 45 MPH I -·~--~ ... ~~:"sf. I ~ (Posted in CJ ,' Mecrian) ::::.. / {!./ ~~ i 0 i - 0.9 miles Rolling with horizontal curves. No Parking Anytime on both sides. 80' <'\ ~ ~ <, . Two lanes and bike lane in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous tum pockets. Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on both sides. Undeveloped, backup single-family residential; multi-unit residential at Ocean Crest Dr on WIS. 15,936 (September 2009) September 25, 2009. Indian VaHey Road. CRITICAL SPEED: 48 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 39-48 MPH E2:Z:l!!S N.T.S. 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO. W/SPEEOING: 0 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.13 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 48 mph and would nonnally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit However, Option 2 of the 2012 Celifomia MUTCD methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above ieason. I - 4 6 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: EDDINGHILL DR. TO HIGHRIDGE RD. City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9125/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G::l SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN -s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK -- \fl PARK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 42 MPH I N.T.S. ~O"~ ~~~4 San Nicholas Dr I Granvia Altamira !·~ I Ridgegate Dr considered a north/south roadway for the purpose of this study (double posted in median) <;}> al -:{!' 79$ <:!>.~ '· ~~#........_SeamoUntDr ii ~ ~++ 4?j}~ /# ~ 0.8 miles Rolling with horizontal curves. No Parking Anytime on both sides. 80' Two lanes and bike lane in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous tum pockets. Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on both sides. Backup residential. Commercial on WIS at Granvia Altamira. Hawthorne Frontage Rd located on the WIS SIO Grayslake Rd. 18,944 (September 2012) September 25, 2012. Mid-block between Granvia Altamira and San Nicolas Dr CRITICAL SPEED: 46 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 38-47 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08to12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 5 NO. W/SPEEDtNG: 3 PREDOMINATE: REAR END HBO, DRUNK. H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.30 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c: COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would nonnally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason. I - 4 7 Traffic Engineering Survey I STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: HIGHRIDRGE RD. TO INDIAN PEAK RO. City of Rancho Palos Verdes I DATE: 9125/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (OATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 43 MPH I N.T.S. 0.4miles Rolling with horizontal curve. No Stopping Anytime on both sides. No Parking Anytime EIS. 80' Two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median. Bike route on both sides. I ~ I ~11 Note': Hawthorne Blvd is considered north/south roadway for the purposes of this study Concrete curb and gutter on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on the EIS; sidewalk on the w/s from Shorewood Rd to northerly. Backup residential. Commercial at limits. Hawthorne frontage road on the WIS bit Shorewood Rd. and Grayslake Rd. 34,599 (September 2012) September 26, 2012. NIB -100 ft north of Raven Spur Dr. SIB -50 ft south of Woodbrook Rd. CRITICAL SPEED: 46 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 38-47 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 3 NO. WISPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: REAR END HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.20 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 46 mph and would nonnally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. I - 4 8 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CITY LIMIT "' City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25113 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK . CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS {SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 47 MPH ,-------\ I \ ' \ ' \ : School Zone \ , ///I N.T.S. 0.9miles Horizontal curves with steep downgrade to the north. EIS: No Stopping Any Time at Silver Spur. WIS: No Stopping Any Time btwn N/O Blackhorse and Silver Spur. 80' Two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous tum pockets. Concrete C&G on both sides. WIS: SW from Silver Spur to 100 ft N/O Blackhorse. EIS: SW first 100 ft from Silver Spur to Blackhorse. Undeveloped land and back-up residential. High School on WIS at Silver Spur Rd. 25,222 (September 2012) September 26, 2012. NIB -200 ft south of Blackhorse Rd. SIB -300 ft north of Blackhorse Rd. CRITICAL SPEED: 52 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 42-51 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 7 NO. WISPEEDING: 1 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 [ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.28 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANSAVERAGE: 1.60ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES • .,, COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 52 mph and would nonnally justify a 50 mph posted speed limil However, due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain unifonnity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons. I - 4 9 Traffic Engineering Survey I STREET: HIGHRIDGE RD LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BLVD TO ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CITY BOUNDARY City of Rancho Palos Verdes t DATE: 9125113 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS (i] SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 36 MPH ~' ~'t><t : R1-1 <:?°' -\ ' ' -\ Ridgecrest Intermediate School 0.8 miles Rolling with horizontal curves. No Stopping Any Time on both sides. Concrete curb and gutter on both sides. Continuous concrete/asphalt sidewalk on both sides. I IE 35 l/ . ::e. Highrictge Rf·~·· I CJ. E2ZI!!? N-T.S. Commercial at northern limits. Undeveloped, multi-residential frontage on both sides. Church N/O Peacock Ridge Rd on east side. 8,749 (September2012} September 25, 2012~ NIB -200 ft south of Hilltop Cir. SIB -100 ft south of Ridgegate Dr. CRmCAL SPEED: 39 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 31-40 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: NIA HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason. I - 5 0 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: MIRALESTE DR LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST TO VIA COLINITA City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS r.i:1 SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN -s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK - 25 ~ W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 35 MPH N.T.S. 0.6 miles -_._ 35\. -,~1 R1-1 'r .Je II L .'§ Oi ~1 a> ~~ 'i i ~ to Rolling with horizontal curves. ~ i i¥ -- Parking allowed on both sides, except for limited red curb at Via Bramante and Via Colinita. Varies from 28 to 32 ft per direction of travel. E/B direction at higher elevation than W/B direction. One lane in each direction separated by a center parkway, except for two lanes eastbound from PVDE to Via Bramante. Concrete or AC curb on outside of lanes; limited amount of curb on inside (parkway) side. Commercial development and fire station at PVDE. Residential frontage on both sides. 6,352 (September 2012) September 25, 2012 E/B -4064 Mireleste Dr. W/B -4031 Mireleste Dr. CRITICAL SPEED: 38 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 30-39 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08to12/31/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 4 NO. W/SPEEDING: 3 PREDOMINATE: REAR END HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.96 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE:2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, Option 2 of the 2012 Califomia MUTCD methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit iemain at 35 mph for the above reason. I - 5 1 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: MIRALESTE DR LIMITS: VIA COLINITA TO LOS ANGELES CITY BOUNDARY City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25113 . ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 37 MPH § .s: 0 0 ~ 0.6 miles Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. .. _ ~ -....:: . /\'~-"-.. _ Parking allowed on both sides except for No Stopping Any Time from 1st St to 405 ft south. Varies from 66' to 70' Chandeleur Dr One lane in each direction with TWL TL Bike lane from City limit to 450 ft S/O 1st St on EIS; to N/O Rich Ln on WIS. ------ iiilZ N.T.S. Via Colinita to 1st St; WIS edge of pavement, EIS C&G. 1st St to Chandeleur Dr; WIS C&G wlSW, EIS edge of pavement and AC. Single and multi-unit residential. 12,371 (September 2012) September 25, 2012. 4405 Miraleste Dr. CRITICAL SPEED: 40 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 33-42 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 1 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: OTHER HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 1 [ ACCIDENT RATE: 0.12 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed Hmit is prudent It is 18COmmended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. I - 5 2 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: MONTEMALAGA DR LIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO PALOS VERDES ESTATES CITY BOUNDARY City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN \ I I \ I w'\6: 6: " 0.7 miles Rolling with horizontal curves. Parking allowed on both sides. 64' ~ ... i s.I ~ 0 ~ ... ~ Silver Spur 1 \ ~ Elementary Sche>ol 0 • ')? L!1 ""as I •,,,. RM~, R1-1 N.T.S. One lane and one bike lane in each direction separated by a raised center median. [ _t r .: a ... .. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. SW on SIS btwn Silver Spur and 50' W/O Basswood and on N/S btwn Basswood and 1,200' W/O Grayslake ••• FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup and fronting residential on SIS, E/O Basswood Ave. Undeveloped and frontage road on SIS, WIO Basswood. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,765 (September 2012) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. EIB -5442 Montemalaga Dr. W/B -across from 5400 Montemalaga Dr. AVERAGE SPEED: 36 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 39 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 32-41 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08to12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 1 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK. H&R: 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.19 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speeds is 39 mph and would normaUy justify a 40 mph posted speed limit However, Option 2 of the 2012 Cslifomla MUTCD methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is appried and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason. I - 5 3 Traffic Engineering Survey I STREET: PALOS VERDES DR s LIMITS: 1,300 FT W/O SCHOONER DR TO LOS ANGELES CITY LIMIT City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1 DA TE: 9125/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1·1 STOP SIGN 40 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGESPEED: 41MPH Palos Verdes Dr East \ ,. scenicut-Q 40 tumo Palos Verctes Dr South N.T.S. 1.57miles Rolling with Horizontal curves. September 26, 2012. E/B -200 ft west of Conqueror Dr. W/B • 100 ft east of Conqueror Dr. CRITICAL SPEED: 44 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 37-46 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 6 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.24 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANSAVERAGE: 1.25ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES • ., COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 44 mph and would nonnally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, Option 2 of the 2012 Califomia MUTCD methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is appl"ied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. I - 5 4 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: PALOS VERDES DR s LIMITS: 1,500 FT E/O SEA COVE DR TO 1,300 FT W/O SCHOONER DR City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9125/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ· MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN s SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 38 MPH "° 9b ' ~ ~<l :;;. \ N.T.S. 1.44 miles Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade approx. 800 ft E/O Narcissa Dr No Stopping Anytime on both sides. Varies from 30 to 32 ft in areas divided by raised median per direction of travel. Varies 35 to 36 ft in areas with no raised median. Undeveloped and backup residential. 12,201 (September 2012) September 26, 2012. South Bay Archery Club. CRITICAL SPEED: 41 10 MILE PACE: 33-42 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08to12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 7 NO. W/SPEEDING: 2 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 2 [ t "' ;s .. ~ g ACCIDENT RATE: 0.37 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.25 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would nonnally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit However, due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, a steep downgrade, and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers. a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. I - 5 5 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: RIDGEGATE DR LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BLVD TO HIGHRIDGE RD City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9125/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ MAP SYMBOLS "lJ PARK 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 25 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 28 MPH Q~ ~~# ~7 \ N.T.S. 0.5miles I •• .?~-a \ ~ ~ '\& ~.;, C)r Downgrade to the west at Hawthorne Blvd. Flat with horizontal curves between Ridgecove Ct and Highridge Rd. Parking allowed on both sides, except for red curbs at intersections. 40' One lane in each direction separated by a yellow skip centerfine, with 4" white edge line. Sidewalk, concrete curb and gutter on both sides. Multi-unit residential. 1,721 {September2012) September 25, 2012. 100 ft west of Ridgebluff Ct CRITICAL SPEED: 32 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 23-32 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08to12/31/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 0 NO. WISPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE:2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -25 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -25 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 32 mph and would nonnally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, hidden driveways, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It Is recommended that the speed limit remain at 25 mph for the above reasons. E a. I - 5 6 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: VIA VICENTE/CALLE ENTRADERO LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR w TO PALOS VERDES DR w City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25113 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOi SIGNATURE: ,.. MAP SYMBOLS @ SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS {SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK {DATEILOC) AVERAGE SPEED: 31 MPH ~ Scenic Turnout 0.9 miles Rolling with horizontal curves. No parking allowed except in designated areas. Varies from 26' to 36' Palos Verdes Drive West IP -11~1, 35. J9 J One lane in each direction. Raised center median entrance treatments at PVDW. Skipped yellow centerline. Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk onW/S. Sidewalk on EIS between parallel parking areas. Undeveloped land on WIS. Backup residential on EIS. 297 (September 2012) September 26, 2012 1,200 ft north of Celle Viento CRITICAL SPEED: 36 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 28-37 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 K ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES • ., COMMENTS EXISTING SPEED ZONE -35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -35 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph and would nonnally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason. I - 5 7 Truck Traffic STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO CITY LIMIT (RHE) Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I DA TE: 9125/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G) SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) AVERAGE TRUCK SPEED: 36 MPH , ///I N.T.S. .90miles Horizontal curves with steep downgrade to the north. EIS: No Stopping Any Tme at Silver Spur and at Blackhorse. W/S: No Stopping Any Time btwn N/O Blackhorse and Silver Spur. Varies from 30 to 32 ft per direction of travel. Two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous tum pockets. Concrete C&G on both sides. W/S: SW from Silver Spur to 100 ft N/O Blackhorse. EIS: SW first 100 ft from Silver Spur to Blackhorse. Undeveloped land and back-up residential. High School on WIS at Silver Spur Rd. 25,222 (September 2012) October 15, 2012 and October 16, 2012. 1000ft south of Blackhorse Rd. CRITICAL TRUCK SPEED: 44 MPH I TRUCK 10 MILE PACE: 29-38 MPH 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1108to12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: NIA HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.6 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES COMMENTS EXISTING TRUCK SPEED ZONE -25 MPH PROPOSED TRUCK SPEED ZONE -40 MPH The 85th percentile truck speed is 44 mph in the northbound direction and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the northbound lruck speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reasons. E ... I - 5 8 TRUCK TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SURVEY STREET: NIB HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO CITY LIMIT (RHE) CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DATE: 9/25113 I 900 I I I I I I < I I I I I I . 850 1.5% -5% - 800 ~ ~ "' E Q. 5.5% I .~ t! 750 t::i 5% Q. ~ "' 700 i 5% "" l- 650 4% ~ ~ 2.5% [J E .::; 600 3% b -t<3 c: 0 -,2 ii 4% ~ 550 ... i<lf > -.m ~ 5.5%= ~ w -i<n I 500 E ~ ~ I ~ 450 I I ~ I I I i I I !ti 400 ! ' ~ I I ~ @ 350 ~ ~ [c3 ~ 300 11 ~ ~ 250 I " ' I ,, i± 0:: w 18 8~ ~ ~ 0 ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ + ... 8 ~ ~ 0 ::I + 0 II) 0 g ~ ~ f5 == ~ 0.. II) ..... ..... N N~ Cl) .s r;o ... ~ ...I - l s = u.; Station v I - 5 9 Truck Traffic STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: RHONE DR TO PALOS VERDES DRIVE WEST Engineering Survey :. 1 \ City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25113 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE~ ~.A. l.. ~') T111Ck.,JS ,II. ..... \ MAP SYMBOLS LosVerdesDr --y1-1 v \fl PARK Trucks use....._ ,1 ~, ,.._ ~'10/Je a lowergear ~ ~... 'I' ~ ~ ~~ -~ TRAFFIC SIGNAL Alta Vista -1 L. -I.:.,. ,.._Dupre Dr ~ R1-1 r R1-1 STOP SIGN J' '7" R1-1r ~I~ g S ~ Robert Ryan ;-40 • 45 ~ R2-1 SPEED SIGN .~ -'1..1 ~~ Park \fl on 3 .A. ~ __ 0 ~ _.._ median 45 45 ~ S SCHOOL CROSSWALK gJ !}11.. ~ 'l/al\Of\ 0_!_ -~ ~ == i,-45j 4 -~! ~ CROSSWALK > Vi ca 1ti. Trucks use 2s I ~ --0 18 pn rr gear <r111Ck Scenic I ~ 40 11.. W13-1 SPEED WARNING -2 ~ . ,_ • .mot0e ~ Tum-Out I " r' SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN 0.. -• ... \'UJ ... ":..:.,;, ~ City Hall'k1!1 ic;; Crestmont Ln N.T.S. ~ a. DISTANCE 2.57 miles e " ALIGNMENT Horizontal and vertical curves with steep downgrade SIB. I I PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Parking Anytime on both sides. No Stopping Anytime at Via Rivera on WIS. ~ STREET WIDTH 80' -88' i No OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes and bl""ke lane each din!cllon separated by a raised madian bit Rhone Dr and Dupnie Dr. Two lanes only on each dlreclion saparated by raleed median/median :! • barrier bit Dupl88 Dr and Vallon Dr. Two lanes and bike lane in each din!cllon separated by raised medianlmedian barrier bit Vallon Dr and PVDNW. ,;; IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) g::~::=:::=:::i~=:s~~~~~~~~~=i::=:o~=·er. bolhsideS. ~ FRONTING DEVELOPMENT ==::r'Mu~~i::,v~~~~=,:,~,!:rcH.CommerclalatPVDW. ~ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 16,241 (September2012) ~ 11------------1--------------------------------~---------11~ SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) October 15, 2012 and October 16, 2012. 200ftnorth of Dupre Dr. ! AVERAGE TRUCK SPEED: 35 MPH I CRITICAL TRUCK SPEED: 40 MPH TRUCK 10 MILE PACE: 31-40 MPH ~ 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/010 I TOTAL MIQ.BLOCK ACC: 0 I NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 I PREDOMINATE: NIA I HBO, DRUNK. H&R: 0 f ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES ~ EXISTING TRUCK SPEED ZONE -25 MPH PROPOSED TRUCK SPEED ZONE -35 MPH ~ The 85th perc;entile truck speed Is 40 mph in the southbound direction and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to ~ COMMENTS horizontal curves, vertical curves, moderate bicycle traffic. and a steep downgrade that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is e prudent It is recommended that the southbound truck speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reasons. ~ I - 6 0 Wdl>;.r -Cl '~Z dOS bl<O""'"n" ""nu•-un 01 QUO~H -GWOl.Ub\OU-ti?'\t;tQOl.IC l'IO"!l\e-1 """'~ amMJ(l!:l ?n?:1\SMS -:i: uu-to1 1 n"'1 U(\~~llDJ1\1~n-nN1\ '' ...... 00+00~ '#. ':: 0::: It) MOl\d c .... w 00+96 z 0 '#. :c 0::: N 00+06 ~ 8.181\!H 81.A pdeo et.A I-00+99 en '#. ' ~ ...... ~ 00+09 0::: '#. c N OO+SL m . r-r-..... - fl8H All::> c 0::: • OO+OL ~ -~ ,_ . 9 '#. ...... • 00+99 ~ ~ " 00+09 ii :::i OO+SS . . . c::: .2 OO+OS _,_ ~R1 ~ _,_ _,__ ~,.... ~ • r------OO+St' '#. JQ UOH8J\ m 0) , w OO+Ot' z 0::: 0 ~ ~ OO+st --, :c (f) I~ OO+Oe ""' ~ m ~ " ti oo+si ~ JO eaidna w 0::: tn Ci oo+oi '#. s C") OO+S~ >-BJS!ABJIV w '#. (.) ~ ~ """ 00+0~ -::> en JC S9PJ9A soi H: en ~ ~ (!) OO+S c.: I-~ ::.::: 0::: 0 (.) w :::c 0 00+0 ::> w ~ 0::: ~ 0 g 2 g ~ 0 0 :g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 I-(!) g U) f5 ~ z LL CIO .... CD w 0 ~ uo1ieAe13 0 I-61 Traffic Engineering Survey I STREET: BA VEND DR , I City of Rancho Palos Verdes DA TE: 9125/13 I I ) LIMITS: GENERAL ST TO CRESTWOOD ST ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS @ SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 15 1.. SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT r' ASSEMBLY C (CA) S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE I .09mile ALIGNMENT I Horizontal cuNe. PARKING RESTRICTIONS I None STREET WIDTH I 36' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN I One lane in each direction dMded by single broken yellow line. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) I Concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk on both sides. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT I Residential, school on east side. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC I 934 (September 2012) SPEED CHECK (DA TE/LOC) I NIA AVERAGE SPEED: NIA CRmCAL SPEED: N/A 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 111/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCKACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 '._R1-1 R~~. ,115 c-\w • ~ ~--R1-1 R1·1~ ~·~ ~\ \.dl @ Crestwood Street Elementary School 10 MILE PACE: NIA PREDOMINATE: NIA :-" ~ HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 K ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SCHOOL SPEED ZONE -15 MPH PROPOSED SCHOOL SPEED ZONE -15 MPH Per Section 22358.4 of the Csllfomla Vehicle Code {CVC) if the segments meets al of the following characteristics: has two traffic lanes; a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour Immediately prior to and after the school zone In a r9Sldentlal district It can be reduced to ., 15 mph. Since the segments meets an the characterfstlcs It Is recommended that the reduced school zone speed limit remain at 15mph. I - 6 2 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CRESTWOOD ST LIMITS: BAYEND DR TO UPLAND ST City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS c$' 0 SCHOOL l ~ Qj 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R~R1-1 R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN Crestwood St c;; ~ !! g- R1·11 15 ~ SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT .... ASSEMBLY C (CA) R1-1~;~1 s SCHOOL CROSSWALK I CROSSWALK 0 Crestwood Street Elementary School ~15-.-Ii 'R1·1 _,.,.........._ R1·1~ ~~1 • R1-1 ~ 1 cf N.T.S. DISTANCE I .14mile ALIGNMENT I Horizontal curve. PARKING RESTRICTIONS I Parking restrictions and loading & unloading zone on south side. STREET WIDTH I 36' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN I One lane in each direction divided by single broken yellow line. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) I Concrete curb & gutter on both sideS. Sidewalk on south side. Sidewalk 375' west of Upland St on north side. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT I Residential, school on south side. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC I 1,460 (September 2012) SPEEDCHECK(DATE/LOC) I NIA AVERAGE SPEED: N/A CRITICAL SPEED: NIA 10 MILE PACE: NIA 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: NIA HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SCHOOL SPEED ZONE -15 MPH PROPOSED SCHOOL SPEED ZONE -15 MPH Per Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) if the segments meets all of the following characteristics: has two traffic lanes; a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour Immediately prior to and after the school zone in a residential district It can be reduced to 15 mph. Since the segments meets all the characteristics It is recommended that the reduced school zone speed limit remain at 15mph. I - 6 3 Traffic Engineering Survey I STREET: GENERAL ST LIMITS: BAYEND DR TO CRESTWOOD ST City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1 DA TE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS G:l SCHOOL 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 ~ R1-1 STOP SIGN 15 L. SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT r' ASSEMBLY C (CA) S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK DISTANCE .19mile <$' ~ ~ ltJttt R1-1, R1-$rJ'R1-1 G:l Crestwood Street Elementary School \J bf ~ ~ "~ gj ..,,,,+.._t_.~ R1-~~~1-1 6l~~' ~ i e I ALIGNMENT I Horizontal curve. H PARKING RESTRICTIONS I None STREET WIDTH 36' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction devlded by single broken yellow line. IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk on east side only. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Residential, school on west side. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 2,768 (September 2012) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) NIA AVERAGE SPEED: N/A CRmCAL SPEED: NIA 10 MILE PACE: NIA 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: NIA HBO, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CAL TRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES •c COMMENTS EXISTING SCHOOL SPEED ZONE -15 MPH PROPOSED SCHOOL SPEED ZONE -15 MPH Per Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) if the segments meets all of the following characteristics: has two traffic lanes; a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour Immediately prior to and after the school zone In a residential dstrict It can be reduced to 15 mph. Since the segments meets an the characteristics, it is recommended that the reduced school zone speed limit remain at 15mph. I - 6 4 Radar Speed Distribution Forms Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-65 Street CRENSHAllVBOULEVARD Limits SEA CREST DR TO CREST RD CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 9/27/2012 Begin 9:40 End 11:00 Surveyed at MID-BLOCK BTW'l SAN CLEMENTE AND SEA CREST Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 50 0 x x 0 0 45 0 0 x x 0 x 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 40 x x x 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 x x x x 0 x 0 x x x x 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 x x 0 0 0 35 0 0 x 0 0 x x x 0 x x x 0 x 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 x 0 x 0 30 x x x x x x x x x x x 25 x x 20 15 30 X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 50th% 37 MPH 85th% 41 MPH Average 37 MPH 10MPH 32 41 % in Pace 71% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percenteae 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0IM 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0111 0 0% 100.0111 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 99.0% 1 1% 99.0% 3 3% 98.1% 2 2% 95.2% 2 2% 93.3% 1 1% 91.4% 4 4% 90.5% 6 6% 66.7% 9 9% 81.0% 5 5% 72.4% 7 7% 67.6% 13 12% 61.0% 11 10% 48.6% 8 8% 38.1% 6 6% 30.5% 4 4% 24.8% 6 6% 21.0% 3 3% 15.2% 4 4% 12.4% 4 4% 8.8% 2 2% 4.8% 1 1% 2.9% 0 0% 1.9% 2 2% 1.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 105 100 I-66 Street CRENSHAW BOULEVARD Limits CREST RD TO RHE CITY LIMIT CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 9126/2012 Begin 16:00 End 16:40 Surveyed at MID-BLOCK BTWN CREST AND CRESTRIDGE Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 65 60 55 0 0 0 50 x 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 x 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 x x x x x x x x x 0 40 x x x x x 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 x x 0 0 x x x x 0 x 35 x x x 0 0 x 0 0 x x x x 30 25 20 15 X -North bound O -South Bound Total Observed 50th % 43 MPH 85th % 47 MPH Average 42 MPH 10MPH 39 48 % in Pace 72% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaae 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0111 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.M 0 0% 100.0' 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'11 1 1% 100.0'll 2 2% 99.1% 5 4% 97.4%. 2 2% 93.0'll 4 3% 91.3% 10 9% 87.8111 8 7% 79.1'11 10 9% 72.2% 7 6% 63.5% 10 9% 57.4% 8 7% 48.7% 10 9% 41.7111, 8 7% 33.0% 8 7% 26.1% 4 3% 19.1% 5 4% 15.7% 1 1% 11.3% 5 4% 10.4% 3 3% 6.1% 2 2% 3.5'11 1 1% 1.7'11 1 1% 0.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0111 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0° 115 100 I-67 Street Limits CREST ROAD CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 9/2612012 HAWTHORNE BLVD TO CRENSHAW BLVD Begin 15:10 End 15:46 Surveyed at WHITLEY COLLINS DR Weather CLEAR Direction EASTBOUND & WESTBOUND Recorded by L.T. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 x x 60 x x 55 0 0 x 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 45 x x x x 0 0 0 0 x 0 x x x 0 0 x x x 0 0 x x 0 0 40 x x x 0 0 x x 0 35 x 30 25 20 15 30 X -East bound 0 -West Bound Total Observed 50th% 47 MPH 85th% 52 MPH Average 47 MPH 10MPH 43 52 % in Pace 74% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaae 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 1% 100.0l}l 1 1% 99.1% 1 1% 98.1'1l 0 0% 97.2% 0 0% 97.2% 0 0% 97.2% 1 1% 97.2% 0 0% 96.3% 2 2% 96.3% 4 4% 94.4% 7 7% 90.7% 8 7% 84.1% 7 7% 76.6% 8 7% 70.1% 13 12% 62.61}l 10 9% 50.5% 11 10% 41.1% 8 7% 30.8% 2 2% 23.4% 5 5% 21.5% 5 5% 16.8% " 4% 12.1% 5 5% 8.4% 3 3% 3.7% 0 0% 0.9% 0 0% 0.9% 0 0% 0.9% 1 1% 0.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% O.O'lj 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 107 100 I-68 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street CREST ROAD Date 9/26/2012 Limits PALOS VERDES OR EAST TO GANADO OR Begin 11:15 End 12:15 Surveyed at MID-BLOCK BTVllN OECANIA ANO DELUNA Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by LT. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 ' 55 0 x 0 50 0 0 x 0 0 45 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 x 0 x 0 0 x x 0 x 0 x x 0 40 0 x x x 0 x x x 0 0 x x x 0 x 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x x x x 0 x 0 x 0 x 35 x 0 x 0 x 0 x 0 x x 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 x x x 0 x x 30 x x 0 0 0 25 0 x 20 15 30 X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 50th % 38 MPH 85th% 44 MPH Average 38 MPH 10MPH 34 43 % in Pace 67% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Pen:en•..,,e 0 0% 100.0lll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 O«K 100.0% 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 99.0'lE 2 2% 99.0% 0 0% 97.0% 0 0% 97.0% 1 1% 97.0% 2 2% 96.0% 2 2% 94.1% Ii 5% 92.1% 3 3% 87.1% 5 5% 84.2% 6 6% 79.2% e 6% 73.3% 13 13% 67.3% 5 5% 54.5% e 8% 49.5% 4 4% 41.6% 7 7% 37.6% 7 7% 30.7% 7 7% 23.8% 5 5% 16.8% 4 4% 11.9% 1 1% 7.9% 3 3% 6.9% 1 1% 4.0% 0 0% 3.0% 1 1% 3.0% 0 0% 2.0% 1 1% 2.0% 0 0% 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1% 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 101 100 I-69 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street CREST ROAD Date 9/26/2012 Limits GANADO DR TO RH CITY LIMIT Begin 12:45 End 14:45 Surveyed at 11500' N/O GANADO DR Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 0 50 0 0 45 0 0 x 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 x 0 x x x x x 0 x 0 0 x x x x x 0 x x x 0 35 0 0 0 x 0 x 0 0 0 x 0 x x x 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 0 x 0 0 x x x 0 x 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 x x 25 x 0 20 15 30 X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 5oth % 35 MPH 85th % 41 MPH Average 36 MPH 10MPH 33 42 % In Pace 71% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaae 0 0% 100.0'* 0 0% 100.0CM 0 0% 100.0'1 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0"A 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 98.7% 0 0% 98.7% 1 1% 98.7% 0 0% 97.4% 0 0% 97.4% 1 1% 97.4'* 0 0% 96.1% 3 4% 96.1% 2 3% 92.2% 0 0% 89.6% 3 4% 89.6% 2 3% 85.7% 7 9% 63.1% 2 3% 74.0% 2 3% 71.4% 3 4% 68.8% 10 13% 64.9% 9 12% 51.9% 8 10% 40.3% 9 12% 29.9% 3 4% 18.2% 2 3% 14.3% 6 8% 11.7% 0 0% 3.9% 1 1% 3.9% 0 0% 2.6% 0 0% 2.6% 1 1% 2.6% 1 1% 1.3% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 77 100 I-70 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street CRESTRJDGE ROAD Date 9125/2012 Limits CRENSHAW BLVD TO HIGHRIDGE RD Begin 12:30 End 13:15 Surveyed at CHURCH IN FRONT OF SCHOOL Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 50 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 x x 0 x 40 0 x 0 x x x 0 0 x 0 0 x 0 x 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 x 0 x 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 x 0 0 x x x 0 x x x x x x x x 35 0 x 0 x 0 x x x x x 0 x x x x 0 0 x x 0 x 30 0 x 25 20 15 30 X • North bound 0 • South Bound Total Observed 50th % 39 MPH 85th % 43 MPH Average 39 MPH 10MPH 34 43 % in Pace 76% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaoe 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'M 0 0% 100.0'M 0 0% 100.00A 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.D'* 0 0% 100.0'K 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 2 2% 100.0cil 1 1% 98.1% 2 2% 97.2% 1 1% 95.3% 5 5% 94.3% 4 4% 89.6% 1 1% 85.8% 3 3% 84.9% 7 7% 82.1% 6 6% 75.5% g 8% 69.8% 13 12% 61.3% 12 11% 49.1% 8 8% 37.7% g 8% 30.2% 10 9% 21.7% 4 4% 12.3% 2 2% 8.5% 3 3% 6.6% 2 2% 3.8% 2 2% 1.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 106 100 I-71 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street FORRESTAL DRIVE Date 9/27/2012 Limits PALOS VERDES DRS TO NORTH TERMINUS Begin 11:30 End 13:30 Surveyed at MIO.BLOCK BTllVN PVDS AND PIRATE DR Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 66 60 55 60 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x 0 x 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 35 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 x 0 0 x x 0 x 0 0 0 x x x x x x x 0 0 x 0 x x x 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 x 30 0 x x x 0 0 x x 0 0 0 x x 0 x x x x x x x x x 25 x x 20 15 30 X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 50th% 33 MPH 85th % 37 MPH Average 33 MPH 10MPH 29 38 %in Pace 82% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Totsl Percentaoe 0 0% 100.0C!I 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 Oo/o 100.0% 0 Oo/o 100.0IJI 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 Oo/o 100.0% 0 Oo/o 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 1% 100.0C!I 1 1% 99.0% 1 1% 97.9% 1 1% 96.9% 1 1% 95.8% 1 1% 94.8% 3 3% 93.8% 0 0% 90.6% 3 3% 90.6% 8 8% 87.5% 7 7% 79.2% 9 9% 71.9% 8 8% 62.5% 8 8% 54.2% 11 11% 45.8% 8 8% 34.4% 13 14% 26.0% 4 4% 12.5% 3 3% 8.3% 2 2% 5.2% 1 1% 3.1% 2 2% 2.1% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 96 100 I-72 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street GRANVIA ALTAMIRA Date 912612012 Limits HAWTHORNE BLVD TO PVE CITY LIMIT Begin 12:50 End 13:28 Surveyed at 100' S/O MONERO DR Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by J.L. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 50 45 x x 0 0 40 x 0 0 x x 0 x x x 0 x 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x x x 0 0 x x x 0 x 0 35 0 x x x 0 0 x 0 x 0 x x x 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 x 0 0 x x x x 0 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 0 x x 0 x 0 0 x x x x 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 30 x x 0 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 25 20 15 30 X • North bound o -South Bound Total Observed 50th% 34 MPH 85th % 37 MPH Average 34 MPH 10MPH 29 38 % in Pace 91% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaae 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0111 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 1% 100.0111 0 0% 99.0% 0 0% 99.0% 1 1% 99.0% 2 2% 98.1% 2 2% 96.1% 2 2% 94.2% 4 4% 92.2% 9 9% 88.3% 12 12% 79.6% 13 13% 68.0% 13 13% 65.3% 11 11% 42.711! 12 12% 32.0'll 10 10% 20.4'11 7 7% 10.7% 3 3% 3.9% 1 1% 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0%.,. 103 100 I-73 Street Limits HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 9/25/2012 PALOS VERDES DR W TO VALLON DR Begin 10:00 End 10:35 Surveyed at CITY HALL DRIVEWAY Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 0 0 55 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 x x 0 0 0 0 45 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 x x x 0 40 x x x x x x x 0 0 x x x x x x x x 0 35 x x 30 25 20 15 30 X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 50th% 44 MPH 85th% 49 MPH Average 45 MPH 10MPH 40 49 % in Pace 76% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentami 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 1% 100.0% 1 1% 99.1% 0 0% 98.1% 0 0% 98.1% 1 1% 98.1% 2 2% 97.2% 2 2% 95.3% 5 5% 93.5% 3 3% 88.8% 7 7% 86.0% 8 7% 79.4% 7 7% 72.0% 6 6% 65.4% 10 9% 59.8% 11 10% 50.5% 15 14% 40.2% 4 4% 26.2% 4 4% 22.4% 9 8% 18.7% 3 3% 10.3% 2 2% 7.5% 3 3% 5.6% 1 1% 2.8% 1 1% 1.9% 0 0% 0.9% 1 1% 0.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 107 100 I-74 Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Limits VALLON DR TO CREST RD Surveyed at LOS VERDES DR CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 9/2512012 Begin 10:45 End 11:20 Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 x 55 x 0 0 0 0 50 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 x x x x 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 45 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 40 x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x xx x x 35 30 25 20 15 30 X • North bound O -South Bound Total Observed 50th% 45 MPH 85th% 49 MPH Average 45 MPH 10MPH 40 49 %in Pace 77% Number of Pereentof Cumulative Vehicles Total Pereentaoe 0 0% 100.0lll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0CM 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 1% 100.0lll 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 3 3% 99.1% 2 2% 96.4% 11 10% 94.6% 8 7% 84.8% 9 8% 77.7% 8 5% 69.6% 10 9% 64.3% 11 10% 55.4% 7 6% 45.5% 8 7% 39.3% 7 6% 32.1% 8 5% 25.9% 14 13% 20.5% 5 4% 8.0% 4 4% 3.6% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 112 100 I-75 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 9/25/2012 Limits CREST OR TO EDOINGHILL DR Begin 11:30 End 12:00 Surveyed at INDIAN VALLEY RO Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 x 60 0 55 0 x x x 0 x x x 50 x x x x x 0 0 x x 0 x x x 0 0 0 x 0 x 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 45 x x 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 x 0 x x x x 0 x x 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 40 x x x 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 x x 0 x x x 0 35 0 30 25 20 15 30 X -North bound O -South Bound Total Observed 50th% 44 MPH 85th% 48 MPH Average 45 MPH 10MPH 39 48 % in Pace 82% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percenteae 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 1 1% 99.1% 0 0% 98.2% 0 0% 98.2% 0 0% 98.2% 0 0% 98.2% 2 2% 98.2% 1 1% 96.4% 1 1% 95.6% 1 1% 94.5% 3 3% 93.6% 3 3% 90.9'M 4 4% 88.2% 3 3% 94.5% 5 5% 81.8% 14 13% 77.3% 18 15% 94.5% 7 6% 50.0% 9 8% 43.6% 10 9% 35.5% 11 10% 26.4% 10 9% 16.4% 5 5% 7.3% 1 1% 2.7% 1 1% 1.8% 0 0% 0.9% 1 1% 0.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0'1! 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0 110 100 I-76 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Limits EDDINGHILL DR TO HIGHRIDGE RD MID·BLOCK BTWN GRANVIA AL TAMIRA AND Surveyed at SAN NICLOLAS DR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Date 9/25/2012 50th% Begin 13:30 End 14:05 85th % Weather CLEAR Average Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 42 MPH 46 MPH 42 MPH 38 47 %in Pace 88% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percentaae 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'M 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.00A 60 0 0% 100.00A 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 1 1% 100.00A 55 0 0% 99.0% 0 0% 99.0% 0 0% 99.0% 0 1 1% 99.0% 0 0% 98.1% 50 x 0 2 2% 98.1% 0 1 1% 98.2% 0 0% 95.2% x x x 0 0 0 6 6% 95.2% x x 0 0 0 0 6 6% 89.5% 45 x x x x 0 0 0 7 7% 83.8% x x x x 0 0 0 0 8 8% 77.1% x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10% 695% x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13% 60.0% x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 10 10% 46.7% 40 x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13% 37.1% x x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 13 12% 23.8% x x 0 0 4 4% 11.4% x 0 0 3 3% 7.6% x x 2 2% 4.8% 35 0 1 1% 2.9% x 1 1% 1.9% 0 0% 1.0% x 1 1% 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 30 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X • North bound O -South Bound Total Observed 105 100 I-77 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 9/2612012 Limits HIGHRIDGE RD TO INDIAN PEAK RD Begin 13:40 End 14:29 Surveyed at 100' W/O RAVENSPUR DR {EBl Weather CLEAR Surveyed at 50' E/O WOODBROOK RD {WBl Recorded by J.L. Direction EASTBOUND & WESTBOUND MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 x 60 55 x 50 x x x 0 x x 0 0 x x x x 0 x x x x 0 0 0 45 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 40 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x 0 x 0 35 x 0 0 x 30 25 20 15 30 X -East bound 0 -West Bound Total Observed 50th % 43 MPH 85th % 46 MPH Average 43 MPH 10MPH 38 47 % in Pace 82% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaae 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 1 1% 99.1% 0 0% 98.1% 1 1% 98.1% 3 3% 97.2% 4 4% 94.4% 5 5% 90.7% 7 6% 86.1% 12 11% 79.6% 11 10% 68.5% 12 11% 68.3% 12 11% 47.2% 8 7% 36.1% 8 7% 28.7% 6 6% 21.3% 8 7% 15.7% 3 3% 8.3% 2 2% 5.6% 3 3% 3.7% 1 1% 0.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0'1(1 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% D 0% 0.0% D 0% 0.0% D 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% D 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% D 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 108 100 I-78 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 9/26/2012 Limits SILVER SPUR RD TO RHE CITY LIMIT Begin 14:40 End 15:17 Surveyed at 200' S/O BLACKHORSE RD (NB} Weather CLEAR Surveyed at 300' N/O BLACKHORSE RD (SB! Recorded by J.L. Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 x 0 D x 0 55 x 0 0 x x 0 0 x 0 x 0 0 x x x 0 D 0 0 50 x x x 0 0 0 x x 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 45 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x x 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 x 0 0 40 x 0 0 x x 0 35 30 25 20 15 30 X -North bound 0 • South Bound Total Observed 50th% 47 MPH 85th% 52 MPH Average 47 MPH 10MPH 42 51 % in Pace 75% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaae 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 2 2% 100.0% 1 1% 98.1% 0 0% 97.1% 0 0% 97.1% 2 2% 97.1% 3 3% 95.2% 4 4% 92.4% 2 2% 88.6% 3 3% 86.7% 7 7% 83.8% 6 6% 77.1% 4 4% 71.4% 11 10% 67.6% 10 10% 57.1% 10 10% 47.6% 11 10% 38.1% 8 8% 27.6% 7 7% 20.0% s 5% 13.3% 3 3% 8.6% 3 3% 5.7% 1 1% 2.9% 2 2% 1.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 105 100 I-79 Street Limits HIGHRIDGE ROAD CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 9/2512012 HAwrHORNE BLVD TO RHE CITY LIMIT Begin 14:37 End 15:29 Surveyed at 200' S/O HILL TOP CIRCLE (NB} Weather CLEAR Surveyed at 100' S/O RIDGEGA TE DR (SB} Recorded by J.L. Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 6 10 16 20 26 65 60 55 50 45 x 0 x x 0 0 40 x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 x x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 x x 0 0 0 30 x x 0 0 25 20 15 30 X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 50th% 36 MPH 85th % 39 MPH Average 36 MPH 10MPH 31 40 % in Pace 91% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaae 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.00il 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 2 2% 100.0% 4 4% 98.1% 7 7% 94.4% 6 5% 87.9% 8 7% 83.2% 14 13% 75.7% 16 14% 62.6% 16 15% 48.6% 14 13% 33.6% 7 7% 20.6% 6 6% 14.0% 6 5% 8.4% 4 4% 3.7% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 107 100 I-80 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MIRALESTE DRIVE Date 9/2512012 Limits PALOS VERDES DR E TO VIA COLINITA Begin 11:09 End 11:48 Surveyed at 4064 MIRALESTE DR {EB} Weather CLEAR Surveyed at 4031 MIRALESTE DR (WB} Recorded by J.L. Direction EASTBOUND & WESTBOUND MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 6 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 50 45 x x x x 0 40 x x 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 35 x x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x 0 0 0 0 x x 0 0 0 0 30 x x 0 0 0 0 0 25 20 15 30 X • East/South bound O • West/North Bound Total Observed 50th % 35 MPH 85th % 38 MPH Average 35 MPH 10MPH 30 39 o/o in Pace 92% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaae 0 0% 100.D'*i 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.091 0 0% 100.091 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.091 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.091 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0111 0 0% 100.0111 0 0% 100.0111 1 1% 100.0111 2 2% 99.1% 2 2% 97.2% 3 3% 95.3% 7 7% 92.5% 9 8% 85.8% 8 8% 77.4% 12 11% 69.8% 17 16% 58.5% 13 12% 42.5% 11 10% 30.2% 8 8% 19.8% 8 6% 12.3% 6 6% 6.6% 1 1% 0.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 106 100 I-81 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MIRALESTE DRIVE Date 9/25/2012 Limits VIA COLINITA TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT Begin 15:45 End 16:12 Surveyed at 4405 MIRALESTE DR Weather CLEAR Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by J.L. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 50 45 x x 0 x x 0 0 xx x x 0 x 0 x 40 x x 0 x x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 x 0 x x x x 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x x 0 x x x 35 x x 0 x 0 0 x 0 x 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x 0 0 x x x 0 0 x 30 25 20 15 30 X -North bound O -South Bound Total Observed 50th% 37 MPH 85th % 40 MPH Average 37 MPH 10MPH 33 42 % in Pace 90% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaae 0 0% 100.0'% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.00A 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'% 1 1% 100.0IM 1 1% 99.0% 3 3% 98.0% 4 4% 95.0% 6 6% 91.1% 8 8% 85.1% a 8% 77.2% 11 11% 69.3% 13 13% 58.4% 13 13% 45.5% 13 13% 32.7% 9 9% 19.8% 6 6% 10.9% 3 3% 5.0% 2 2% 2.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 101 100 I-82 Street Limits MONTEMALAGA DRIVE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 9/25/2012 SILVER SPUR TO PVE CITY BOUNDARY Begin 13:00 End 13:41 Surveyed at 5442 MONTEMALAGA DR (EB} Weather CLEAR Surveyed at ACROSS FROM 5400 MONTEMALAGA !WBl Recorded by J.L. Direction EASTBOUND & WESTBOUND MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 50 45 x 0 x x x x x 0 0 40 x x x 0 0 0 x x xx x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 0 x x x x 0 30 x 0 25 20 15 30 X • East bound 0 • West Bound Total Observed 50th% 36 MPH 85th% 39 MPH Average 36 MPH 10MPH 32 41 % in Pace 91% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentane 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0% 2 2% 100.0% 0 0% 98.1% 7 7% 98.1% 6 6% 91.4% 11 10% 85.7% 12 11% 75.2% 12 11% 63.8% 14 13% 52.4% 12 11% 39.0% 8 8% 27.6% 7 7% 20.0% 7 7% 13.3% 5 5% 6.7% 2 2% 1.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0~ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0~ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 105 100 I-83 Street Limits CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH Date 9/26/2012 1.300' W/O SCHOONER TO LA CITY LIMIT Begin 10:27 End 11:16 Surveyed at 200' W/O CONQUEROR DR {EB} Weather CLEAR Surveyed at 100' E/O CONQUEROR DR (WB} Recorded by J.L. Direction EASTBOUND & WESTBOUND MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 x 50 x x x x 0 45 xx x x 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 35 x 0 0 x 30 25 20 15 30 X -East bound 0 -West Bound Total Observed 50th% 41 MPH 85th % 44 MPH Average 41 MPH 10MPH 37 46 % in Pace 90% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percen"""e 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'11 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0" 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 99.0% 0 0% 99.0% 2 2% 99.0% 1 1% 97.1% 2 2% 96.1% 6 6% 94.2% 10 10% 88.3% 12 12% 78.6% 14 14% 67.0% 13 13% 53.4% 14 14% 40.8% 12 12% 27.2% 6 8% 15.5% 2 2% 7.8% 2 2% 5.8% 3 3% 3.9% 1 1% 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0'11 0 O%:SJJ 103 100 I-84 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH Date 9/26/2012 Limits 1,500' EJO SEACOVE TO 1.300' W/O SCHOONER Begin 10:00 End 10:23 Surveyed at SOUTH BAY ARCHERY CLUB Weather CLEAR Direction EASTBOUND & WESTBOUND Recorded by J.L. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 6 10 16 20 25 65 60 55 50 45 0 x 0 x x x 0 x 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 x 40 x 0 x x 0 x 0 x x x 0 x x x 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 x x x x x 0 0 x 0 0 x x 0 0 x x 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 x 0 x x x 0 0 0 35 x x 0 x x 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 x x x x 0 x 30 25 20 15 30 X • East bound 0 • West Bound Total Observed 50th% 38 MPH 85th% 41 MPH Average 38 MPH 10MPH 33 42 % in Pace 91% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentaoe 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100,M 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0CM 0 0% 100.0CM 0 0% 100.09' 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.MI 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0IJE 0 0% 100.0'M 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'M 1 1% 100.0'M 3 3% 99.0% 3 3% 96.0% 5 5% 93.1% 5 5% 88.1% 7 7% 83.2% 14 14% 76.2% 16 15% 62.4% 12 12% 47.5% 12 12% 35.6% 11 11% 23.8% 6 6% 12.9% 6 5% 6.9% 2 2% 2.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 101 100 I-85 Street Limits RIDGEGATE DRIVE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 9/2512012 HAWTHRONE BLVD TO HIGHRIDGE RD Begin 13:50 End 14:31 Surveyed at 100' W/O RIDGEBLUFF CT Weather CLEAR Direction EASTBOUND & WESTBOUND Recorded by J.L. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 0 x 0 x x 0 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 x x x 0 0 0 x x 0 0 0 30 x x 0 x x x x 0 0 x 0 x x x x 0 x 0 x x 0 x x 0 x x 0 x 0 x x 0 x x 0 x x 0 0 x x 0 x x 0 x x 0 x 0 0 25 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 x 0 x x x x x 0 0 0 x 0 x 0 x x 20 x 15 X -East bound O -West Bound Total Observed 50th % 28 MPH 85th% 32 MPH Average 28 MPH 10MPH 23 32 % in Pace 85% Number of Percent of Cumulative Vehicles Total Percentage 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'M 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0'M 0 0% 100.0'M 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 3 3% 100.0% 3 3% 97.2% 5 5% 94.3% 6 6% 89.6% 8 8% 84.0% 11 10% 76.4% 9 8% 66.0% 10 9% 57.5% 10 9% 48.1% 11 10% 38.7% 9 8% 28.3% 9 8% 19.8% 7 7% 11.3% 3 3% 4.7% 1 1% 1.9% 1 1% 0.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 106 100 I-86 Street Limits CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY VIA VICENTE/CALLE ENTRADERO Date 9/2612012 PALOS VERDES DR WTO P.V. DR W Begin 7:46 End Surveyed at 11200' N/O CALLE VIENTO Weather CLOUDY Direction NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND Recorded by J.L. MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 50 45 40 0 x x 0 x 0 0 x 0 35 0 x x 0 0 x x x 0 0 x x 0 0 x 0 0 x 0 x 0 0 x 0 30 x x x x x 0 x 0 0 x 0 x 0 x 0 0 0 x 25 x x x x x x x 20 15 9:46 30 X -North bound O -South Bound Total Observed 5oth % 85th % Average 10MPH %inPace Number of Vehldes 31 MPH 36 MPH 31 MPH 28 37 72% Percent of Cumulative Total Pereentaaa 0 0% 100.0'll 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.01 0 0% 100.0 0 0% 100.0 0 0% 100.0 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0IH 1 2% 100.0111 1 2% 98.3% 2 3% 96.6 3 5% 93.1 2 3% 87.9~ 4 7% 84.5% 5 9% 77.6% 5 9% 69.0% 5 9% 60.3114 5 9% 51.7% 6 10% 43.1% 4 7% 32.8% 3 5% 25.9114 3 5% 20.7% 2 3% 15.5% 2 3% 12.1% 2 3% 8.61H 2 3% 5.2'!1 1 2% 1.7'll 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0'!1 0 0% O.O'll 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 58 100 I-87 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY FOR TRUCKS Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date October 9, 15, 16, 2012 50th% 36 MPH Limits SILVER SPUR RD TO RHE CITY LIMIT Day 1 10:35 To 12:45 85th% 44 MPH Surveyed at 1000' SIO BLACKHORSE ROAD Day2 12:20 To 15:05 Average 36 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND Day3 8:15 To 9:55 10MPH 29 38 Recorded by F.P. Weather CLEAR %inPace 50% MPH NUMBER OF TRUCKS Number of Percent of Cu mutative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Trucks Total Pen:entaae 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0~ 50 0 0% 100.~ x x x 3 5% 100.0~ 0 0% 94.8% x x 2 3% 94.8% x x 2 3% 91.4% 45 x 1 2% 87.9% x x 2 3% 86.2% x x x x 4 7% 82.8% x x 2 3% 75.9% 0 0% 72.4% 40 x x x 3 5% 72.4% x xx 3 5% 67.2% x x xx 4 7% 62.1% 0 0% 55.2% x x x x 4 7% 55.2% 35 x x x x x 6 9% 48.3% x x 2 3% 39.7% x 1 2% 36.2% x 1 2% 34.5% x x x 3 5% 32.8% 30 x x x x x 5 9% 27.6% x x x x 4 7% 19.0% x x x 3 5% 12.1% x 1 2% 6.9% x x 2 3% 5.2% 25 x 1 2% 1.7"A 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X -North bound O -South Bound Total Observed 58 100 I-88 Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY FOR TRUCKS Date 10115/12 and 10/16/12 Limits RHONE DR TO PALOS VERDES DR WEST Day 1 8:10 To 12:10 Surveyed at 200' N/O DUPRE DRIVE Day2 10:00 To 15:15 Direction SOUTHBOUND Weather CLEAR Recorded by F.P. MPH NUMBER OF TRUCKS 5 10 15 20 25 65 60 55 50 0 0 45 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 20 15 30 X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 50th% 85th% Average 10MPH % In Pace Number of Trucks 33 MPH 40 MPH 35 MPH 31 40 61% Percent of Cumulative Total Percentane 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0~ 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 4% 100.0% 0 0% 96.4% 1 4% 96.4% 0 0% 92.9% 0 0% 92.9% 1 4% 92.9% 0 0% 89.3% 0 0% 89.3% 0 0% 89.3% 3 11% 89.3% 4 14% 78.6% 3 11% 64.3% 0 0% 53.6% 0 0% 53.6% 1 4% 53.6% 0 0% 50.0% 3 11% 50.0% 2 7% 39.3% 1 4% 32.1% 2 7% 28.6% 1 4% 21.4% 1 4% 17.9% 1 4% 14.3% 3 11% 10.7% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 28 100 I-89 APPENDIX B Collision Rates Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-90 1 CRENSHAW BLVD SEACREST DR CREST RD 0 1,742 0.4 0.00 2.55 2 CRENSHAW BLVD CREST RD RHE CITY LIMIT 2 20,473 0.8 0.11 1.60 3 CRESTRD HAWTHORNE BLVD CRENSHAW BLVD 0 10,368 1.6 0.00 1.60 4 CRESTRD PALOS VERDES DRE GANADO DR 1 3,047 0.8 0.37 2.00 5 CRESTRD GANADO DR RH CITY LIMIT 0 707 0.8 0.00 2.55 6 CRESTRIDGE RD CRENSHAW BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD 4 6,917 0.5 1.06 2.55 7 FORREST AL DR PALOS VERDES DRS NORTH TERMINUS 1 1,416 0.3 2.15 2.55 8 GRANVIA ALTAMIRA HAWTHORNE BLVD PVE CITY LIMIT 0 9,402 0.2 0.00 2.55 9 HAWTHORNE BLVD PALOS VERDES DR W VALLON DR 2 15,265 1.0 0.12 1.60 10 HAWTHORNE BLVD VALLON DR CREST RD 3 16,241 1.0 0.17 1.60 11 HAWTHORNE BLVD CREST RD EDDINGHILL DR 2 15,936 0.9 0.13 1.60 12 HAWTHORNE BLVD EDDINGHILL DR HIGHRIDGE RD 5 18,944 0.8 0.30 1.60 13 HAWTHORNE BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD INDIAN PEAK RD 3 34,599 0.4 0.20 1.60 14 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 7 25,222 0.9 0.28 1.60 15 HIGHRIDGE RD HAWTHORNE BLVD RHE CITY LIMIT 0 8,749 0.8 0.00 2.55 16 MIRALESTE DR PALOS VERDES DR E VIA COLINITA 4 6,352 0.6 0.96 2.55 17 MIRALESTE DR VIA COLINITA LA COUNTY LIMIT 1 12,371 0.6 0.12 2.55 18 MONTEMALAGA DR SILVER SPUR RD PVE CITY LIMIT 1 6,765 0.7 0.19 2.55 19 PALOS VERDES DR S1 ,300' W/O SCHOONER DRLA CITY LIMIT 6 14,150 1.57 0.24 1.25 20 PALOS VERDES DR S1 ,500' E/O SEACOVE DR 1,300' W/O SCHOONER DR 7 12,201 1.4 0.37 1.25 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I - 9 1 21 RIDGEGATE DR HAWTHORNE BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD 0 22 VIA VICENTE/CALLE ENTf!ADERO PALOS VERDES DR W PALOS VERDES DR W 0 TRUCK SPEED ZONE ON DESCENDING GRADES 23 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 0 24 HAWTHORNE BLVD RHONE DR PALOS VERDES DR W 0 !REDUCED SCHOOL ZONE SPEED UMITS 25 BAYENDDR GENERAL ST CRESTWOOD ST 0 26 CRESTWOOD ST UPLAND ST BAYENDDR 0 27 GENERAL ST CRESTWOOD ST BAYENDDR 0 1,721 0.5 297 0.9 25,222 0.9 15,265 2.57 934 0.09 1,460 0.14 2,768 0.19 0.00 2.55 0.00 2.55 0.00 1.60 0.00 1.60 0.00 2.55 0.00 2.55 0.00 2.55 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I - 9 2 APPENDIX C Survey Equipment Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-93 SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements for this survey was two Genesis VersaPak Hand-Held traffic Radar manufactured by Decatur Electronics, of Decatur, Illinois. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of each unit were conducted in accordance with the manufacturers specifications. Both Genesis VersaPak Hand Held Traffic Radars were last calibrated on November28, 2012 by R.H. F, Inc. Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes I-94 ATTACHMENT C I-95 August 5, 2014 Ms. Nicole Jules Deputy Director of Public Works City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275-5391 Subject: Truck Speed Zone Engineering and Traffic Survey Dear Ms. Jules: fKw1LLDANj SD years Willdan Engineering has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and . update the posted speed limits for two (2) Trucks Zones on Hawthorne Boulevard between Silver Spur Drive and the Rolling Hills Estates City Limit and Rhone Drive and Palos Verdes Drive West. These segments were last surveyed in 2007, and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The Engineering and Traffic Survey for decreasing truck speeds was based on Section 22407 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) which allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit for trucks on downgrades based on the findings of an Engineering and Traffic Survey and Section 28.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), which specifies the requirement for an Engineering and Traffic Survey for truck speed zones on descending grades including but not limited to: the segment should have a recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles; a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more be provided. The Truck Speed Zone Engineering and Traffic Survey collected radar data and traffic counts. The radar speed survey was collect for 2 days (5 hours) between Rhone Drive and Palos Verdes Drive West and 3 days (7 hours) between Silver Spur Drive and RHE City Limit due to the low truck volumes encountered at the truck zone locations. The survey also analyzed accident data for the three (3) year period from 1/1/08 to 12/31/10. Furthermore, we reviewed the existing conditions including the old Engineering and Traffic Survey. During our review of existing conditions, we noticed the City of Rolling Hills Estates (RHE) has truck escape lanes on Hawthorne Boulevard between Silver Spur Drive and Palos Verdes Drive North, however, the City of RHE does not have any truck speed zones along Hawthorne Boulevard but is currently refurbishing the escape lanes. The Engineering and Planning I Energy Elllclency and Sustalnablllty I Financial and Economic Consulting I National Preparedness and Interoperability 562.908.6200 I 800.499.4484 I fax: 562.695.2120 I 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405, Industry, Callfomla 91746-3443 I www.willdan.com I-96 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Truck Speed Zone Engineering & Traffic Survey August 5, 2014 Page2 escape lanes were implemented when Hawthorne Boulevard was owned and maintained by Caltrans prior to the City of RH E's incorporation. Our data collection and analysis for the truck speed zone was not able to produce similar results as those recommended in 2007. We can only assume such a drastic change in speed recommendation is due to the 2007 truck speed zone radar survey not being performed per the Engineering and Traffic Survey guidelines. We found the old survey for the truck speed zone did not include the radar speed survey data and therefore, we were unable to review the data collected, and the location where the samples were collected at to justify a 25 mph truck speed zone. The truck speed zones being recommended are shown below including the existing and proposed posted speed limits. No. STREET FROM TO EXISTING NEW 23 HAWTHORNE SILVER SPUR RHE CITY LIMIT 25 40 BLVD. RD. 24 HAWTHORNE s 25 35 BLVD. "'"""'""-,_"_ ............................ __ ,,_,,_ .. ..,...,. __ , An Engineering and Traffic Survey is necessary for officers to enforce the posted speed limits with the use of radar. The City has three options regarding the recommended truck speed zones: adopt the recommendations, do not adopt the recommendations or adopt posting at 25 mph truck speed zone. If the recommended truck speed zones are adopted as recommended above, then officers will be able to cite trucks that exceed the recommended speeds for trucks and not have those citations challenged in court. If the City chooses not to adopt the truck speed zones recommended above, then officers will only be able to cite trucks whose speed exceeds the posted speed limit (trucks and vehicles will be cited under the same posted speed limit). If the City chooses to keep the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph, officers will not be able to enforce it. Those citations will be challenged in court because no radar speed survey can justify that a 25 mph posting was developed upon the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey. Very truly yours, 100114/L01 I-97 ATTACHMENT D SAMPLE TRUCK WARNING SIGNS TRUCKS. TRUCKS• USE. R·IG.HT LANE I-98