The URL can be used to link to this page

RPVCCA_CC_SR_2013_06_04_C_Border_IssuesCITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: REVIEWED: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CAROLYNN PETRU, AICP, DEPUTY CITY MANAGE~ JUNE 4, 2013 BORDER ISSUES STATUS REPOR~{) CAROLYN LEHR, CITY MANAGER UY-- Project Manager: Kit Fox, AICP, Senior Administrative Analyst~ RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the current report on the status of Border Issues. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This month's report includes: • A status report on the Brickwalk, LLC project in Rolling Hills Estates; • An update on recent issues and events related to the Rancho LPG butane storage facility in Los Angeles (San Pedro); • A final report on the Marymount College San Pedro campus on Palos Verdes Drive North in Los Angeles (San Pedro); • A follow-up report on the draft Port Master Plan Update (PMPU) and draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) in the Port of Los Angeles (San Pedro); • A report on the release of the draft Los Angeles County General Plan Housing Element for the unincorporated County "islands" on the Peninsula; and, • An update on proposed demolition and construction activity by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts at the former Palos Verdes landfill in Rolling Hills Estates. BACKGROUND The following is the regular bi-monthly report to the City Council on various "Border Issues" potentially affecting the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes. The complete text of the current status report is available for review on the City's website at: http://palosverdes.com/rpv/planninglborder issues/2013120130604 Borderlssues StatusRpt.cfm C-1 MEMORANDUM: Border Issues Status Report June 4, 2013 Page2 DISCUSSION Current Border Issues Brickwalk, LLC Mixed-Use Condominiums, Rolling Hills Estates On May 14, 2013, the Rolling Hills Estates City Council again considered the Brickwalk, LLC project (see attached Staff report). The Staff report noted that previous deficiencies with respect to the provision of community space and the lack of affordable housing had been addressed by the developer with the inclusion of a 1,000-square-foot community room and three (3) affordable housing units. The developer also provided detailed financial information about the project regarding the cost of construction and landslide remediation. The Rolling Hills Estates City Council continued to express concern about the efficacy of the proposed landslide remediation efforts and the adequacy of insurance and other surety to ensure that the project could be completed once construction begins. At the conclusion of its deliberations, the Rolling Hills Estates City Council directed its Staff to obtain a 3rd-party independent review of the proposed project and Final EIR, and continued this matter to a future hearing date to be determined (see attached PV News article). Staff will continue to monitor this project in future Border Issues reports. Rancho LPG Butane Storage Facility, Los Angeles (San Pedro) At the April 2, 2013, City Council meeting, Mayor Brooks noted that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had issued a "Notification of Potential Enforcement Action for Violation of Section 112(r)(7) of the Clean Air Act" to the Rancho LPG facility. Rancho LPG was given until April 15, 2013, to file written responses to EPA's allegations. On May 6, 2013, Staff e-mailed the EPA (see attachments) to inquire into the status of Rancho LPG's response. However, as of the date that this report was completed, Staff had received no resp-onse from the EPA. Beginning in November 2012, San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United has made several requests of the Los Angeles Department of City Planning (DCP) to initiate nuisance abatement proceedings against the Rancho LPG facility. DCP's response to each of these requests has been that there are no grounds upon which to pursue nuisance abatement against the facility (see attached e-mails). In the past two (2) months, Janet Gunter has forwarded several items via e-mail, drawing comparisons between the Rancho LPG facility and other recent hazard issues and events. These have included: • The Chevron refinery fire in Richmond, CA in August 2012 • The PG&E gas line explosion in San Bruno, CA in September 2010 • The fertilizer plant explosion in West, TX in April 2013 • Recent offshore earthquakes in May 2013 C-2 MEMORANDUM: Border Issues Status Report June 4, 2013 Page3 Copies of these e-mails are attached to tonight's report. Staff will continue to monitor this project in future Border Issues reports. Marymount College San Pedro Campus Master Plan, Los Angeles (San Pedro) A May 12, 2013, Daily Breeze article about Marymount College (see attachments) noted that the Los Angeles City Planning Commission had approved the San Pedro Campus Master Plan in April 2013. In spite of the fact that the City had previously commented on this project on several occasions, Staff was not provided with notice of this hearing. A copy of the April 11, 2013, meeting agenda, which includes a description of the approved project, is attached. Staff will remove this item from future Border Issues reports. Port Master Plan Update, Port of Los Angeles Staff prepared the attached comments on the Port Master Plan Update (PMPU) and the related the related draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). Our comments focused primarily upon the Port's Risk Management Plan and the storage and handling of hazardous liquid bulk cargoes. Staff will continue to monitor this project in future Border Issues reports. New Border Issues Los Angeles County General Plan Housing Element Update, Unincorporated Areas of the Peninsula On April 23, 2013, the City was notified of the availability of the County's Draft Housing Element Update for public review and comment. As for all municipal jurisdictions in California, the State mandates regular updates to the General Plan Housing Element so as to ensure that adequate provision is made for appropriate housing at all income levels for current and expected future residents. The complete draft of the County's proposed Housing Element is available at http:llplanning.lacountv.gov/housingldraft. Locally, the County's Housing Element serves as a policy framework for the improvement and development of housing and housing opportunities in the unincorporated areas of the Peninsula (i.e., Westfield, Academy Hills, The Estates and the South Coast Botanic Garden), known collectively as the 442-acre "Westfield Planning Area". Another nearby County "island" is the 135-acre "La Rambla Planning Area" in San Pedro, which is roughly bounded by West 1st Street, South Meyler Avenue, West 7th Street and South Weymouth Avenue. On May 22, 2013 Staff forwarded the attached comments to the County of Los Angeles. Our comments focused on the potential quality-of-life impacts that could result from significant new residential development in these two (2) planning areas, including increased density/intensity of development and traffic. The County is required to submit its updated Housing Element to the State by October 15, 2013. Staff will continue to monitor and report on this issue in future Border Issues reports. C-3 MEMORANDUM: Border Issues Status Report June 4, 2013 Page4 Former Border Issues Former Palos Verdes Landfill, Rolling Hills Estates In 2007, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) proposed to replace the existing gas-to-energy facility at the former Palos Verdes landfill with a fuel cell, eight (8) microturbines, associated landfill gas compression and treatment equipment, a backup generator, reconfiguration of the aboveground landfill gas collection system, and the use of a low-emission flare to combust landfill gas that could not otherwise be beneficially used for power production. Although we joined with concerned residents in asking LACSD to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project, LACSD prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), which was certified in March 2008. The implementation of these improvements was delayed for several years. During that period, the quantity and quality of landfill gas (i.e., methane) continued to decline, to the point that LACSD determined that updating the gas-to-energy facility was no longer feasible. Therefore, LACSD now proposes to simply demolish the facility and flare any remaining methane, relying upon the 2008 MND to do so. The Rolling Hills Estates City Council received a presentation of the revised project on May 14, 2013 (see attached Staff report). Also attached to tonight's report are recent articles and a "Letter to the Editor" that appeared in the PV News. Attachments: • RHE City Council Staff report for Brickwalk, LLC project (dated 5/14/13) • Daily Breeze and PV News articles regarding the Brickwalk, LLC project (published 5/12/13 & 5/16/13) • E-mail from Staff to EPA regarding Rancho LPG response to EPA notice of March 14, 2013 (dated 5/6/13) • E-mails from San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United regarding requests for nuisance abatement at Rancho LPG facility (miscellaneous dates) • E-mails from Janet Gunter regarding Rancho LPG facility (miscellaneous dates) • Daily Breeze article regarding Marymount College (published 5/12/13) • Los Angeles City Planning Commission agenda (dated 4/11/13) • Comments on the Port Master Plan Update and Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (dated 4/2/13 & 4/8/13) • Comments on the Los Angeles County Draft 2013 General Plan Housing Element (dated 5/22/13) • RHE City Council Staff report regarding demolition of the gas-to-energy facility at the former Palos Verdes landfill (dated 5/14/13) • PV News articles and "Letter to the Editor" regarding demolition of the gas-to- energy facility at the former Palos Verdes landfill (published 5/9/13, 5/16/13 & 5/23/13) M:\Border lssues\Staff Reports\20130604_Borderlssues _ StaffRpt.docx C-4 RHE City Council Staff report for Brickwalk, LLC project C-5 AGENDA s ff R tMAY 1 4 201~ ta epo iTEMNO. '613 City of Rolling Hills EstW.~~~==..J DATE: MAY 14, 2013 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: NIKI WETZEL, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DAVID WAHBA, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-07 OVERVIEW APPLICANT: MR. STEPHEN JORDAN, THE AURIC GROUP, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: BRICKWALK, LLC (MR. GEORGE DANESHGAR) LOCATION: 655-683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE/924-950 INDIAN PEAK ROAD The following is a request to approve: 1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 67553; 2. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a mixed-use development including 148 condominium/townhome units and 14,200 square feet of commercial space in the Commercial General (C-G)/Mixed-Use Overlay Zone; 3. A Precise Plan of Design (PPD) for buildings and structures; 4. A Variance to exceed the maximum permitted building height; 5. A Variance to permit a smaller setback than required by Code; 6. A Variance to permit fewer parking spaces than required by Code/shared parking agreement; 7. A Grading application is required to permit stabilization of the landslide and building pads for buildings and structures; and 8. An Environmental Impact Report, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) BACKGROUND Public Notices Mailed: 4/30/2013 Public Notices Posted: 5/2/2013 Public Notices Published: 5/2/2013 (Dates indicated are for this public hearing only.) C-6 DISCUSSION This item was last heard at the February 12, 2013 City Council meeting. Minutes of that meeting are attached herein as Attachment 1. At that meeting, the City Council open the public hearing, took public testimony, discussed the issues, closed the hearing, and continued the project to a date uncertain. Public notification was provided for this meeting, and, as of this writing, one comment letter has been received (see Attachment 2). Several issues were discussed at the last meeting, and a summary is provided below. It can be noted that the applicant will be providing a presentation at the meeting that addresses these issues and/or will be prepared to answer questions regarding them. Affordable Housing As discussed at the last meeting, Ordinance No. 646 requires that mixed-use projects assist the City in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) especially with regard to affordabl~ housing. Since the last meeting, the applicant has verbally indicated a proposal to provide three affordable condominium units in the podium building. While the income category (i.e., very-low, low or moderate) for the units has not been proposed, the applicant indicates the ability to provide three very-low income units if directed by the City Council. For the information of the City Council, the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation for affordable units, as provided in the City's 2008-2014 Housing Element, and the related maximum income for 2013 is seen in the chart below: RHNA Allocation and Income Category Description Income Cateoorv Verv Low Low Moderate Percentage of LA County Median Income 31-50% 51-80% 80-120% Number of Units Allocated 7 4 5 Income Limit for Family of Four Up to $42,700 Up to $68,300 Up to $77,750 The City Council may wish to note that three units deed-restricted to moderate-income families have previously been required of the approved 75-unit project at 927 Deep Valley Drive (Mediterranean Village). Community Room As further discussed at the last meeting, Ordinance No. 646 requires mixed-use projects to provide for a specific benefit to a segment of the community including, but not limited to, facilities for teens or children, a community recreational or meeting room, or a senior center. Since the last meeting, the applicant has verbally indicated a proposal to provide approximately 1 ,000 square feet of building square footage for community room purposes. Financial Information In recommending approval of project Variances to the City Council, the Planning Commission noted that the recommendation was predicated on an assumption that requested project density is required to provide funds for repair to the landslide area inherent to the site. The Planning Commission did not review financial evidence in support of this assumption and suggested that information be provided to the City Council. Accordingly, Attachments 3-6 provide a letter from Mr. Craig Stevens of Colliers International as well as a project Proforma, Resales Analysis, and Cost Estimate respectively. Mr. Stevens will present and address the financial information during the applicant's project presentation. 2 C-7 Peer Review of Geotechnical Reports Staff has discussed peer review of the project geotechnical studies with the applicant who agrees to have one conducted. If directed by the Council, staff will identify and present to the City Council a qualified geotechnical consultant to conduct the peer review. Expanded Insurance Discussion at the last meeting indicated a potential requirement for the project to provide expanded insurance to account for ground movement after project construction given the history of the site. The applicant is researching obtaining additional insurance and will be prepared to discuss it at the public hearing. Draft Environmental Impact Report An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) including a Statement of Overriding Consideration is required for the project. Deborah Pracilio of LSA Associates will present the Draft EIR at the meeting. Should the Council desire, staff will conduct any additional environmental investigations as directed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council 1. Open the Public Hearing; 2. Take public testimony; 3. Discuss the issues; 4. Direct staff to prepare additional project and/or environmental information; or Direct staff to prepare a Resolution approving the project, certifying the project Final Environmental Impact Report, and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the next available City Council meeting. EXHIBITS Attached 1. Minutes Excerpt of the City Council Meeting of 2/12/13 2. Letter from Ms. Marilyn Forsythe 3. Letter and Resume from Mr. Craig Stevens 4. Project Proforma 5. Project Resales Analysis 6. Project Cost Estimate Pa01-07 cm 3 C-8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT 1 C-9 MINUTES EXCERPT CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 12, 2013 PA-01-07 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-07; APPLICANT: STEPHEN JORDAN, THE AURIC GROUP, LLC; PROPERTY OWNER: BRICK.WALK, LLC (GEORGE DANESHGAR); LOCATION: 655-683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE/924-950 INDIAN PEAK ROAD Recommendation: That the City Council: 1) Open the public hearing; 2) Take public testimony; 3) Discuss the issues; 4) Continue this application to a date uncertain; and 5) Direct the applicant to prepare a project pro forma or other financial information justifying requested project density and that a community benefit and provisions for affordable housing be further discussed. Principal Planner Wetzel provided a staff report (as per agenda material). Stephen Jordan, The Auric Group, LLC, provided a presentation of the project. Ted Wolfe, Geotechnical Engineer, Petra Geotechnical, provided an overview of the geologic conditions of the site, overriding landslide concerns, and mitigation requirements. Dan Bolton, Bolton Engineering, provided a site plan overview that included townhomes, removal of materials, etc. COUNCILMAN ADDLEMAN inquired as to the cost of caissons that will be constructed for the project. Mr. Bolton noted that he did not know at this time, but will provide further information. COUNCILMAN ZUCKERMAN commented on the number of trucks required to undertake the grading plan. Medinah Adal, Metier Architects, provided an architectural overview and history of the project. COUNCILMAN ZUCKERMAN noted his concern with traffic at Deep Valley and Silver Spur, Silver Spur at Crenshaw Boulevard, Crenshaw Boulevard at Palos Verdes Drive North and other intersections on Palos Verdes Drive North. MAYOR ZERUNYAN stated that he would like to see additional 3-D elevations for a more comprehensive look at the project. C-10 COUNCILMAN ZUCKERMAN noted another concern with regards to adequate parking spaces for the townhomes. In response to a question, Mr. Jordan noted that the homes will be most likely be marketed toward younger families or downsizing couples. Richard Barretto, Linscott, Law and Greenspan Traffic Engineers, responded to a question posed by COUNCILMAN ZUCKERMAN regarding shared parking. COUNCILMAN ZUCKERMAN inquired if signal coordination would be needed at Deep Valley Drive at Silver Spur Road and Silver Spur Road at Crenshaw. He noted his concern regarding queuing. Erik Zandvliet, City Traffic Engineer, noted that if and when a signal is warranted at Deep Valley Drive at Silver Spur, it would have to be coordinated with Crenshaw Boulevard. COUNCILMAN ZUCKERMAN inquired as to why there are mitigation measures proposed at Crenshaw Boulevard and Palos Verdes Drive North, but not at Rolling Hills Road and Dapplegray School Lane. He emphatically stated they should be considered in the traffic plan. Mr. Barretto noted that Crenshaw Boulevard/Palos Verdes Drive North does not meet the criteria for a significant impact. COUNCILMAN ZUCKERMAN emphasized that Rolling Hills Road and Dapplegray School Road should be considered as the proposed project would add more traffic along Palos Verdes Drive North. COUNCILMAN ADDLEMAN moved, seconded by COUNCILMAN ZUCKERMAN TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, MAYOR ZERUNYAN SO ORDERED. Barbara Jean Desalles, 35 Cypress Way, commented on her concern regarding long-term studies of how the soil will be affected and how this development will affect current residents and schools. She noted that more greenery is desired to beautify the area. Jim Forsythe, 31 Cypress Way, noted several concerns that included: 1) Building height; 2) Location of condominiums; 3) Traffic congestion; 4) Reduced parking; 5) Noise levels; and 6) Pedestrian safety. He asked the COUNCIL to reconsider this proposal with his comments in mind. Christina Zimmerman, 19 Ranchview Road, asked how the stability of the hill would be ensured. She noted concerns regarding building density, affordable housing and traffic impacts. C-11 Cat Spydell, 50 Ranchview Road, commented on her concern regarding density and traffic issues. Kim Zappulla, 7 Santa Bella Road, concurred with the previous speakers and noted that she does not see a community benefit in this project being built. Carol Wharton Low, 91 Cypress Way, also noted concern with traffic, density and the amount of vacancies in the area prior to starting another project. Joan Davidson, 1525 Via Arco, Palos Verdes Estates, urged the COUNCIL to look into a prior geologist's report from several years ago in regards to the landslide. Lee Blackman, 63 Cottonwood Circle, commented on his concerns that included: 1) Traffic impacts that need to be evaluated; 2) Construction noise; and 3) Amount of trucks traveling Hawthorne Boulevard. He suggested that a mitigation plan be undertaken for the entire project. COUNCILMAN ADDLEMAN moved, seconded by COUNCILMAN ZUCKERMAN TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO A DATE UNCERTAIN. THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, MAYOR ZERUNYAN SO ORDERED. City Manager Prichard noted that there will not be a quorum for the February 26 meeting and the Policy Development Session is tentatively scheduled for March 2. C-12 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT 2 C-13 Rolling Hills Estates City Hall Attn: CITY COUNCIL . 4045 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 RE: PA-01-07 rt5) IE ~Jt1 w ~ irn1 mf FEB 1 2 2013 lid) CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 31 Cypress Way Rolling HiJls Estates, CA 90274 February 11, 2013 Critique of the Landslide Stabilization and Redevelopment with Townhouses and Street Dear City Council Members: The applicant, Stephen Jordan has agreed to stabilize the lands[ide above Deep Valley Dr. as part of a proposal to build a 102 unit condo building, 46 townhouse units and 14,200 sq. ft. of commercial space with variances at 655 -683 Deep Valley Dr. and 924 -950 Indian Peak Rd. Jordan proposes to build 46 townhouses on the site of the landslide, but there is significant risk associated with landslide stabilization efforts. Building homes on top of restored soil before stabilization is proven, borders on irresponsibility. It can take several years before various environmental stresses (heat, cold, rain, etc.) and the factor of time, have tested the solution implemented. There is a serious hazard to life and substantial financial risk to proplrty if the proposed stabilization techniques prove inadequate. Certain landslide stabilization projects have already failed in Palos Verdes. Only after stabilization is confirmed over a period of several years, should the area be reconsidered for residential or commercial use. An alternative for the above project might be for the City to convert the 924 -950 Indian Peak and landslide portion of the project, into a park with benches or picnic tables, affording a spectacular view of the LA basin, along with hiking/exercise or nature trails up and down the slope. The cost could be prorated among the cities on the hill, since all residents could enjoy the benefits of a park with scenic views and nearly all residents shop or utilize the facilities along Deep Valley Dr. and Peninsula Center at one time or another. As it is, RPV will probably need to shore up Indian Peak Rd. along this stretch in the not too distant future. Another suggestion might be for the Palos Verdes Conservancy to become involved, soliciting donations from the community as it already has with other purchases of land parcels on the hill. Sincerely, Yv\.~1 vt-' f-~.Xk.9- Marilyn Forsythe Concerned Resident 7'd e6po1 Zl!JOl/IJ'lS C-14 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT 3 C-15 Colliers IN H f<NATIONAL l©W~ \.\ll'.i..t :tl>lh 1,,.,';.,.·of ~ ~ ,,.;Ji1,;7 '.:~>'."#1:~ Dear Brickwalk, LLC, This letter is to inform you as to the present market conditions for the planned development located at 655-683 Deep Valley Drive and 924-950 Indian Peak Road. When the development market started heating up in 2010, developers had little to no interest in condominiums -apartments were the only game in town, and even then they were only interested in "A" areas. In March of this year, home developers started looking at for sale product with the anticipation that unemployment was decreasing and more buyers would be entering the market. I was introduced to this property in 2005. At that time, the projections for the project in front of you were at $800 per square foot, based on the average unit size of the flats being 1698 square feet and the average unit size of the townhomes being 1896 square feet. Based on a new project being delivered in 2015, we feel the flats should sell in the $700,000 to $900,000 range, with the townhomes selling in the $950,000 to $1,300,000 range. Because of the location, the retail component should lease in the $2.50 to $3 per foot range. My team sold sites for the development of over 1900 units in the last 3 years. I mention this because the same equity money that would do this project (pension funds, real estate funds, insurance companies, etc.) will be looking for the same kind of return that they were receiving on their equity for apartments. Investors will look at this as being an expensive and time consuming project. A lender will look for equity from the developer of around 20%-30% of the construction costs. That equity would expect a 18%-20% return on their money, with personal guarantees by the developer. This is a well located project in an upscale community, and we expect a quality project to be delivered in 2015 that wilJ be well received and will become a benefit to the community and retail surrounding it. Craig Stevens Colliers International Colliers International 865 S. Figueroa St., Ste 3500 I Los Angeles, CA 90017 I USA www.colliers.com C-16 AFFILIATIONS AND MEMBERSHIPS National Multi-Housing Council National Apartment Association ICSC Member since 1986 CONTACT DETAILS MOB +1 818 516 7777 DIR +1 213 532 3208 FAX +1 213 327 3208 Colliers International 865 South Figueroa Suite 3500 Los Angeles. CA 90017 www .colliers.corn Accelerating success. Craig Stevens SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AREA OF EXPERTISE Craig Stevens, a Senior Vice President with Colliers International, has built a career on his ability to handle the most challenging assignments including ground up, urban infill commercial and multifamily developments and distressed property sales. A 35-year veteran of the commercial real estate industry, Mr. Stevens has successfully completed sale and lease transactions valued at more than $3.56 billion. Since January, 2003, he has sold property and developed land representing more than 3,500 apartments and condominiums. As an investor himself, Mr. Stevens is able to bring an insider perspective to a project or business plan. Mr. Stevens' extensive network of business relationships include Fortune 500 companies as well as family trusts and entrepreneurial firms who have relied on him for his strategic advice as well as his transactional acumen. PROFESSIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS • Honored Among Lee's Top Ten Producers • Former VP of Board of Directors of Burbank Chamber of Commerce and the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation. Colliers INTERNATIONAL ~ c>,..,A$;kt:i ""-;;_)If h-A;;4t ~ ,-.;1;; Craig.stevens@colliers.com MAJOR CLIENTS • BRE • Bank of America • Champion Development • City Ventures • Equity Residential • First Citizens Bank • Fortress Investment Group • F rest/Chaddock • Meta Housing • Mill Creek Residential Trust • Pacific Properties • Pacific Mercantile Bank • The Dinerstein Companies C-17 "Craig is one of the most professional brokers I have had the pleasure to work with." Robert Champion Champion Development Craig Stevens SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Craig.stevens@colliers.com NOTABLE APARTMENT/CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS 6219 De Soto, Woodland Hills -10.4 Acre Site Entitled for 707 Units in Warner Center 610 N Central, Glendale -67,518 Sq Ft Land Parcel Development Site for 245 Units 491 W Gainsborough, Thousand Oaks -Archstone Thousand Oaks Crest 191 Apt Units 5601 East Paramount Blvd., Long Beach -Southwood Gardens 359 Apt Units 1001 National Avenue, San Bruno -The Acapella 187 Units Ambassador West Site in Pasadena -70 Units Condo Dev Site, 27 Apt Units & Mansion Versailles Apartments in Koreatown -225 Units 3711191 h Avenue, San Francisco -Park Merced 3221 Units $175M Recap 600 E. Olive, Burbank -Villa 600 62 Unit Apartments 620 Hollywood Way, Burbank -Pare Point 243 Apartment Units 23639 San Fernando Road, Santa Clarita -158 Apartment Units Warner Center Ray-Art Studios -530 Apartment Units Warner Business Park Woodland Hills - 1 O Acres 525 Apartment Units 1701 East D Street, Ontario -240 Apartment Units C-18 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT 4 C-19 Project Name Project Type Developer Brickwalk Development Proiect Mixed-Use Podium and Townhomes Brickwalk LLC Profit & Loss Summary Base Unit Revenue (TBD) Premium (TBD) Option/Upgrades (TBD) Retail Revenue (TBD) TOT AL REVENUE Closing Costs (0.3% of Revenue) Sales Commissions (0.3% of Revenue) Broker Coop (1% of Revenue) Management Fee (3% of Revenue) Warranty (1% of Revenue) NET REVENUE Entitlements/Pre-Development Building Consultants Development Indirects Building Permits/Impact Fees Soft Costs Building Demo and Site Work Townhome Development Mixed-Use Building Retail Building and Parking Lot General Conditions, Fee, Bonds, Insurance Construction Costs Sales Center Model Decor Monthly Marketing & Advertising Sales Operations Customer Care Sales & CS Costs SUB-TOTAL COSTS Per Unit $0 $0 $0 $59,598 $7,308 $208,314 $385,167 $6,178 $42,353 $649,321 $9,308 $718,227 Totals $0 $0 $0 $8,820,521 $1,081,605 $30,830,535 $57,004,757 $914,335 $6,268,273 $96,099,505 $1,377,510 $106,297,536 NET PROFIT ($718,227) ($106,297 ,536) 5/3/2013 RHE Proforma 050113Summary C-20 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT 5 C-21 1 Year Home Resales: Rolling Hill Estates. Palos Verdes Estates. Rolling Hills. Rancho Palos Verdes (May 2013) >Rolling Hills Estates: Median Sales $1M (2300 SF) Built 1968 >Palos Verdes Estates: Median sales $1.4M (2400 SF) Built 1962 >Rolling Hills: Median Sales $2.9M (3200 SF) Built 1956 >Rancho Palos Verdes; Median Sales $891K (2200 SF) Built 1966 New Homes Generate between 1D°;b to 25% Premium over Resales C - 2 2 5Al£TVPE HOME TYPE Pas! Sale Condo/Coop Past S.le Condo/Coop Poeol Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop PastS.ale Condo/Coop P.lSt S.-.le Condo/Coop Past Sal• Condo/Coop PaslSale Condo/Coop PM! Sal11 Condo/Coop Past!.akl Condo/Ct>op Past Sale Condo/Coop P.nt Sak! Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Pas1Salt-Condo/Coop P.;ist sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Ccindo/Coop P.ut~ condo/Coop PastSale Condo/Coop Past S.ale Condo/Coop Past .s.le Condo/Coop P;;e;t Saki Condo/Coop PastSale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop PastSllle Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop PastSai.. Condo/Coop Pnt s.N Condo/Coop P.nt Salci Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/eoop Pnt Sale Condo/Cogp Past 5.i. Condo/Coop PM! Sale Condo/Coop Past sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sille Condo/Coop Pnt s.te Condo/Coop Pat Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Pan 5.ale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past S.ale Condo/Coop Past S.ale Condo/Coop P:M.t Sale Condo/Coop Pzt Salo Condo/Coop Pasts.ale Condo/Coop Past Sale Conda/Coop Pi1$l s.!e Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Pasts.le c.ondo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past S.ale Condo/Coop P.st S!lle COtldo/Coop Pzt Sale Condo/Coop Pan Sale Condo/Coop Past Sall! Condo/Coop Pnt Sale Condo/Coop Pltlit Solle Condo/COQP P.m S.M Condo/Coop P..,,t Sale Condo/Coop Pi1$I Sale Condo/Coop P~ Sale Condo/Coop PilSt s.te Condo/Cogp Pi1$I s.te Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop P;;e;t Sale Condo/Coop P;ast sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past S.le Condo/Coop P:;ist Sale Cando/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop PastSale Condo/Coop PastSale Condo/Coop P.ast Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop PastS.ale Sin&leF;imllyRes>denllal ~ gn: llall 1042 OCU Rancho Palos Ver~ CA 28121 HIG Rancho P.alos Verdes. CA S700 RAVE Randio Palo:S Vetdt!s CA 296001S!JiR.anthoPalosVerd~ CA S700 RAVE R.ancho P.alos Verdes. CA 32001ARtRandioPalosVer~ CA 29641Sou RanchoPalosVercl6 CA 29641 Sou b!Kho P.alos Verdes CA 29641SotrRanclioP.a!O$Verdes CA 28639 Visl R.ancho Palos Verdes CA 296001Sl.JIR.anthoPalosVerdti CA 1835 CAOt Ranr.ho Palos Verdes. CA 28S13Vts1RanaioP.alosVerdes CA ~)I) RAVl Rancho Palos Verd~ CA 6542 OCfl R.antho P.alos Verde!> 296001SLARanchoP~Verdes 32700CWRanchoP.alos.V«des CA lOOTerr.anR.anchoP.alosVerdes CA 321S95EARanthoPalosVerdes CA 3264fiCO.-R.andulP.alosVerdes CA 6526 OCEI R<111cho P~ Ve1de5 CA 3273.S SEA Rantbo P~ Verde! CA 5917 ARM. Rancho P.alos Verdel. CA 32646 COi lbncho Palos Verdes CA 100 hmm Ra11cho PakM Verdes CA 3200lAR<l:tnchoPaki$Verde5 CA 3200 la Re R.ancho P~ V~rdti CA 3200lAR(bnchoPalo$Ver~ CA 3200laRtRchPalosVrd CA 3200 lA R( Rancho P~ Verdes CA 5700RAVEl\allchoPalm.Verde!. CA 2%41.SO... Ranct>oP•vei-m CA 5937 ARM. Rancho P.afos Verdes CA 29641.SO...R.anchoPalmVerde!. CA 2964lSou Rarn:ho Palm Verde$ CA 28619 FRll Rancho Palos Verde CA Undlsd0$eSanPedro CA 1652STOl>.5.lnPedfo CA 654lOCV!bnd'IOP.alm.Verdes CA 65420CURooothoP.al0$Verdes CA 65260CEIRandioP.al0$Verdes CA 6542 Ocea R.indio Palos Ve-rde$ CA 296001S1.A Rilllcho P.alos VenJE!!. CA 3ZSS9Sei1iRanchoP.ilosVercl6 CA 32679SEA lt.anchoP.alosVerdm. CA 29641SOu'RanchoPalosVerdti CA 29641$WR.andloPalosVerdti 32709 S£A Rancho Palin Verde 1112BYERR.anchoPalo$Ve1des. CA 5987PEACRand>ohlD:iVliriks. CA 5937 ARM. Rancho Palos Verde$ 5917ARM.R.anchoP;ilosV....de:s 596.5 PEAC llancha Palos Verde 5!)59PEAC Rancho Palos Verdes 5630 RAVE R<lllCho Palos Verd"'- 1815 CAD( Rancho Palos Verde:!i 3200lA ft( Rantho Palos Verd*' 32001.A.RlRanchaP.alosVerda. 309S9Via RanchoPillosVerdes 17070ldstl\.anr.hoP.alosVerda. 29000151..A Rimdio Pillos Verdm. CA 32679SEA R.an~ho P• Verdn CA 6S42 oa.c Rancho P.alos VNd"" CA .53 Hilltop •RanchoP.alos Verdes CA 5959 P£AC Rancho Palos Vlfl'dtt CA 2Bl30Rld(~hoPalosVerdes CA S937MM.R.anchoP.alosVerda CA 5941AAM.RanchoP.alosVwdes CA. 3200 l..a It.: Rancho P;;ilos Verdel. CA 5718 RAVl Rancho Palos Verdes CA 28524 VIS) P.I0 Verda Penmswa CA 28S40VISl/lanthoP;;ilosVerdes CA 56S8 RAVE Rancho P.alO!. Verde!. CA 5937 ARM. Rancho P.illos Verdes. CA 5987 PEAC R;;iM:ho Palos Ver~ CA S987PEACR.anchoP.alosVerdes. CA 14SOBri:tlS...nPedro CA 1432 BRET San Ped10 CA 1610STOl\San Padro CA 6542 00.t Rancho P.ab. Verdes CA 14SOBRETS.anPedro CA 2912Vl5T~ hnchoP•los Verdei. CA 1!f USTPfl.IC£~ 90275 435000 90275 338000 90275 370000 90275 530000 90275 399000 90275 642800 90275 180000 90275 286000 90275 234900 90275 90275 90275 359900 90275 429000 90275 257000 90275 90275 459000 90275 90275 464300 90275 406900 90275 395000 90275 648800 90275 397000 90215 498000 90275 629000 90275 90275 775000 90275 ''"'' 90215 400500 90275 285000 90275 334900 90275 270000 90275 255000 9027.S 360000 90732 209000 90732 90275 90275 259000 90275 278800 90275 90275 459000 90275 90275 SlSOOO 90275 282500 90275 90275 585000 '""" 90275 473900 90275 319000 90275 349900 90275 48SOOO 90275 520000 90275 '39000 90275 3680CX) 90275 S4SCOO 90275 699000 90275 90275 90275 90275 460000 90275 440000 90275 90275 269000 90275 90275 419900 90275 90Z75 90275 379000 9027.S dQ9900 9027S 349900 90275 345000 90275 355000 90275 569500 9021s 5200CJO 90732 90732 289900 90732 236900 90275 """"" 9027.S 200000 9021.S 3880000 ~ rn rn ™1.1.~~l.ASTSALEOATE LASTSALEPRlCE ~~ .IJillli§lQ ~ Rf/MAXbtillePrope1titi Ketler&Anoc.RealtyofPV R£/MllX&till11Propen~ Keilet Willi.ams Beach O:le$ 1.75 2 L75 2.25 2.5 25 L75 3 1.75 2 L7S LS L7S 2 2.75 1.5 2 2.S L75 2 25 2 1.75 L75 2 L25 L75 2 L1S L2S 15 L75 1358 1913 2 Garage 3/18/2013 S 380,000 httpJ/www.r· taillfornla Re.I E~tate Vl2125324 1187 1213 1553 1113 36702 37234 36702 137.3 l4l003 1101 1150 "" "" 1'47 72471 72477 31234 1103 U7ll4 1'36 1715' 178 1524 lS6S 1736 U40 1071 1S6S 2470 2362<> 1002 37234 753134 753134 11:>7188 215365 753134 1373 24200l 1527 1527 2420 1373 1445 lll3 36702. 1207 72477 1011 1207 rJ.477 1207 12417 1240 >4852 1305 167015 106!! 167188 "' 718 167US 1"8 1396 1433 1565 '"'' 1SGS 31'4 1200 1 2100 5228.S 1011 1071 215365 1363 43075 lSlO U27! 1165 23620 1337 127114 UH 242003 1527 2426 3610 930 1396 37234 1358 12278 1914 1%4 1914 1964 1974 1965 1965 1%5 1915 1974 1979 1962 1!173 "" 1964 -1964 1973 1964 1969 1964 2008 1974 1974 1974 1974 1974 1%4 1%5 "" .... 196S 1974 ..... "" ""' 1973 1973 1973 1974 1964 .... 1964 1974 "" 1974 1973 1962 197' 197.t 1974 1987 1974 1973 1979 1973 ""' 1071 21S365 1%9 696 215365 1.969 1527 1974 1400 31906 1'4.SS 40!!9 139& l.85714 ll46 1071 21536.S 2100 52285 1219 1211 1068 167188 1491 1485 6551 261W 1973 1974 1974 1965 "" 1914 1974 19!1 1916 1973 1986 19!8 2 GM~t' 2 Garage 2GMll:ge 2 Gilrage 2Ga~ 2 Garilge 2 Gill'.lgt' 2 G¥~e 2 Gar.act> 2 Garq11 2 G•r<lltt> 2 Garage 2 Garaae 2Gar"Bt' 2 Gilta&e 2 G.ar.age 2G.ar~e 2G..atage 2Galqe 2 G¥.ll81!' 2Garase l Garaae 4 G:ifage 2Garage 2 Gar;ige 2 Gar;ige 2 G<M";age 2 G¥.age 2 G.vase 2 Garage 2Gaf<ttte 2 G.:uace 1 Gar411e l Garqe 1 Garage 2 G.arage 2 Gar:age 2 1 Garate 2 Gar.agr 2 G;vitgP 2 G:irage 2 GMagt' 2 Gar.ac,e 2 Gar;ige l ...... l Gar.aie 2 Garage 2 G.lll'age 2 Gar.11e 2 G.arace 2 GM.age- lG.l•;r.ge 2 G;iragll' 2 Garage 2 Gaiqe 2 Garage 2 GM.age 2 G.ara,e 2Gar~e 2 Ga.rage 2 G.rage 1 Garage 2G;inge 2 GMilS:e 1 Garage 3 G;ll';ige 9110/2012 s 10/1111012 s 10/26/2012 s 4/22/2013 $ 4/18/2013 s 10(31/2012 s 11/14/2012 s ll/70/2012 s 12/7.8/lOU $ 3,'20/2013 $ 7{22/2012 $ 1112j2012 5 7/'lll/2012 s 8,'31/2012 5 1019/201'2 $ 12.'11/2012 5 1/9/2013 s 2,'20/2013 s 2/2&/2013 5 3/14/201] s 3/29/2013 s 3/28/2013 s 4,'1212013 s USl2013 $ l.'22/2013 5 l/21/20B 5 1,'29/2013 s 4/2/2013 s 12,'21/2012 s l/24/Xl13 s 10.'10/2012 5 '>f3/2012 5 1/25/2013 s 2/4/2013 s 4/8/2Dl3 $ 5/23/20U S 819/2012 5 6.'14/2012 s 6/18/2012 5 6/29/2012 $ 6/28/201' $ S/10/2012 S 6/11/2012 5 7/27/2012 s 8/20/Xll2 s 8/16/2012 s 8/22/2012 s 7/1312012 s S/18{2012 S 6/13/2012 $ 6/21/2012 s 7/lQ/2012 5 8/17/2012 5 8/24/2012 s 6/20/2Dl2 s 6/22/2012 s 8/23/2012 s 4/22/2013 s 4/18/2013 5 3/28/201.3 s 7.'20/2012 s 2/12/2013 5 2/22/2013 $ l.'15/2013 s 4110/2013 s 4/26/2013 5 4.'30/2ClU S 7/24/2012 s 7/24/2012 s 1QIU/20U S 10/30/2012 s 11/S/2012 S U/8/2012 S llnf20l2 s 12,121/2012 $ 10/22/2012 $ sn012012 s S/29/2012 $ f,/4/2012 $ lQ/19(2012 $ ll/11/2012 s 328.SOO http://w-.nUliformaRe.al btate 12-609S8l JS0.000 htlp://www.ri Callfomi"' Rul E~tMe V12112786 Sl0,000 http://www.r-California Real Utate S1210004.2 395,000 http:/lwww.r-Cill!fornlaRol &tale SBl.3029945 Prudential Callfomi.a Reilly 630,000 http;//~.t· Califoml.a Real htill:e PV13004036 RE/MAX Estate Ptupert~ 27.S,OOO htlp:/lwww.r> C1liforrna Real Eslale 12·625423 Doke & lusodaw. 3116,000 htlp:/lwww.r• CilbfomiaReal Estate Vl2104380 RE}MAX EsU!lle Propert~ 240,000 http:/JW>llW.r> tallfomia Re.al £~ate VUO!l46S6 RE/MAX Estate Properties. 12.S,OOO h1tp://www.redfin.com/CA/R:ancho-Pi1IOS·Verdes/28639·Vlsta-Maderl-9027S/unl1-99/home/7729872 550,000 hnp://www.r-Callfomla l\eal b~e PVl.3002180 RE/MAX Enille Praperti~ 310,000 ht1p://www.r> C.allfomia f\ul Estate Vl20l3S32 RE/MAX Estate Properties. 3%,000 http://www.r> California Real Estate 512104158 Bniln Horan 41S,OOO hUp://www.r· C.llfomoa Real btate Vl2041662 Coldwell Bllnker·PV/Bch. Otla 224,500 hnpJ/www.r· Ollfamia Real Estate V1208.5861 RE/MAX Eltille Proiartlti 4"6,000 hnp;//www.r· Callfoml.a Real Est.ate VUOll274l RE]MAX Utate Proputld. 450,000 lrttp;//wwW.r> C.llfornia Real Estille 511005364 Shorewood Reali~ l.4~,000 http:l/www.rHfln.com/CA/8.ancflo.~I05·Verd6/100.flll'ranea.Way.90275/unlt·28-101/home/21918&4S 464,360 http://-.T> California Re.al Estate PVl21376Cl7 RE/MAX Estate Propertie. 410,000 http://www.r> Callfoml• Real E~t.ate S12U4n2 Rf!/~ Exec:s Redond<i Buch 350.000 http://-·•• Call#orma Re.al Estate \/11143761 Prudenti.al CallfonuaReah:y 620,000 http:/1-.ri Calllomla Roi £«.at• P\113000836 Keller Willi.ms Palo$ Verda 402,000 http://www.ro c..llfom~Rea.1Estate5813030344 P~ntial California Realty 490,000 http://-.ncallfomiaRe.al Est.ale S8130CIS467 l\e/Mu: Execs Redondo Beach 2,000,000 http://-.tedfltl.com/CA/RancOO.Pillos.IJerdes./100-TerrniH·Way-90275/unit-19-201/homt/28916947 620,000 hnp://www.r. CaUfoml• Re.al £st.au· PVl.3000608 RE/MAX Estate Propertle:I. 69S.OOO http://www.~.c.orn/CA/Rafldlo.P;alos-Vattlts/3200-L>Rotond.a-Or·9Cl27S/unlt-214/home/7738435 750.000 hnp://www.r> Calffomla Re.al E~ate SB1300n79 Shorewood 11£ALTOll.S 718,000 http://www.f"Qdfln.tom/CA/Rch-Pi1~Vrd/.320CH.a-Rotonda-Dr-9027Sfuni'1·216/homen133433 620,000 http;//-.t>C.a!lforruaRealfsU!eS12100624 DlhrnardoRe.alty 380,000 http://www.t• Callform.a Real Est.lte 5812144683 I-tome Team Rei>11y l78,000 http:/lwww.r• Caflfornit Roi Estate Sl2016030 Rid.Achau 334,900 httpJ/-.r. C.llfom1• Real Estate 5683976 Am Team Rul Estate 270.000 httpJJwww.r• Califorllia Real ~ate 5812137766 Shorewood REALTORS 245,000 http://www.r• CallfomJa Real Esiate 5812139736 ll!nmsula RN!ty, Inc.. 3SS,000 hnp:/Jwww.r. CiilifomJa Real Estate P839342 Grow Real Estil'le 209,000 http://www.r Ullfom11 Re.al Estate U-585259 Tounl Re.ally 362,000 htt~J-.r> talifomia Real Estate P82187S Coldwell Banker Seadwde 32S,000 hup://-.r> Califor111a RHl Estate Sl201370S fl.obbieM1lb. 2sa,ooa httpJ/www.r> California Rut Estate l2·5!1513S Simon Soomekh 268,000 http:/lwww.r• '4111fornlil Rita! EU.ate V12032638 RE/MAX Esute Properties. 372,000 ht!p:/J.,.._.~n.cOIJ\ICAfRancho-Pafo5.Veules/6542·0cean-Crest·Dr·90275/unlt-Bl06/home/7146187 •30.000 http:Jjwww.n Callforiua Real ES1ate 512029784 Shorewood Reaiti»S ti00,000 hnp:J/www.r.dfln.eorr\ICA/bncho-Palos·Verdft/32859-Se;ipte-Dr-90215/unlt·W6/hotne/7740779 515,000 http://www.r> Callfomlal\eal btilte 512073460 Salb! Re.ally Int. 270.000 http://www.r> Cal!fomJa Re.I Estate VU048778 RE/MAX Esw.e Propertla 226,SOO ht1p://~ .redfki.com/CA/Rancho-Palos-Verdes./29&4l·S-Wes.tern-Aw .. 9027S/i>nit-416/home/8090956 S40,000 http://www.r> C.llform.a Real EU~e Vl207453S Barnett & Co., Reollon. 340.000 http://www.ri Califomla Re.al Esute 512065921 R@}Ma Exe es RPV 45S,OOO http:J/-.riCallfornialle.a.1EstateP813S7S eo.ldwll!!IBankerCoastAll!lnu 369,000 http;//www.r> Cahforma Re~ Esute Vl2018S1B Ri/MAX Estate Propanln 342,500 hnp://www.ri Callfornkl Rl!'al htate V111396S6 Rt/MAX Estate Ptopertles 456.000 http://www.r> Cabfotni<! Real bt;ite Vll.129342 RE/MAX Estate Properties 49S,000 hUp://www.r> C.allfomlil Real £slate Vl2010032 Duston Re.al U.tate ServicH 339,00J h11p;//w-.r> CillJfoml• Real £state Sl2080841 Prudenllal Cahfornla l\ulty 35.S.OOO hnp://_.., n Cahforma Aul Enate P8ZUS3 Ccldwell Banb1 Coat Allianc• ~~.000 hrtp:f/www.r> Catifomla Real Estolte V12047S92 [bgmaJ Hoeblch, Re.ah or 699,000 http://www.r. California Real Esu.te Vll096046 RE/MM Estate Prop11rtles t,410,000 h1tp://www.1'9dfln.com/CA/R;mcho-Palos·Verdes/~Via-!i-Cr~ta.!Ml275/homP./7750lB4 220,000 hnp:/Jw-.redf1n.com/CA/R•ncho-Palm-Verdes./1707-0ld$tonH:1·'90"l.7S/unlt-12/home/7Q.5491 529,SOO http;/fwww.r• C.Ufornia Rtal £slate 13-648103 Sirius M.lltt!!<$ Realty 45S,900 hltp://www.r> C.allfomia Re.al £stale Vll.029164 Keller WJ!liarrl:I P.:.IOll Ve1de5 440,000 http://www.r> t.allfoml.a Real Est.ale S12120869 Keffer WiBiams Really 390,000 httpJ/.,,._.tedfin.tom/CA/Rancho-P;alos·Verdft/53·Hilltop-Ot·902'15/home/7750941 26!;.000 http~/I.,,._ r> Califom111 Real Estate PY12l32818 Ivory Management S17.000 hltp:/lwww . .Mfin.com/CA/R~ntho-P.ahn·Verd...128130-Rldc11p0ent·Ct·9Cl275/unlt·92/home/7749US 370,000 hnp:/~ ri caufomo• RHI Est.ate 5813008728 Leo Nonflnl! REAi.TORS 337.000 hUp://www.r· CallfotniaRul E~ille PV1l040199 Coldwell Blnkl!r·PV/Sdl. Cltffl 695,000 hnp://www.redfln.wm/CA/Rancbo-Pa!O$·Verdes/3200-La-Rotonda·Dl·9027S/unll·215/h0me/7738434 370,000 http;//www.r. Calitomi.a Ru! Est.ate \'12003SU RE/MAXEs1ate Propenle$ 409.900 htlp;//www.r• Callfomiil Real Est.ate Cl2086679 DILB£Clt f\E REAi. UV/NG l90,000 hnp://www.r> C'allfornl.a Real Est.Me P8lOS89 RMt&ll Tiffany RN! Estate 34.S,000 htlpJ/www.r> Cilllfomi.a Real Estille VJ.2()76602 Coldwell 8.anker P.VJSOuth &iy 367.SOO hup:}/www.t> Callfarnia Real E.statr VU1l9529 Coldwell Banker P.VJSOuth Bay SSS,000 http://~.ro California Real Estate Z216SS13 li:eHer Wdlwns Realty 5-12,000 http:/lwww.r> Odifarnia Real bt.ite 51209&180 Harne Team Realty 2SCl.OOO 'nnp:I/~ redfln rom/CA/5an·Pedro/t450-8r..U·Pl·!K>732/unlt-309/home/7686089 283,93;5 http;//www.r•CallfornlaRulEst.ate512026212 ~JnoRe.alty 236,900 http:J/www.r> California Real Estate P815672 511:androw G1oup 3n.ooo 'rrttpJ/Www.r> Callfomia Ru\ hr ate Vl20226Ul RE/MAX Estate Pro~rtlel. 200,000 http://www ri Cal!fomia R11;ii Estate Yl104240 Excellence Re.al Estate Service 3,32!>,00Q htlp:/lwww.ri Califor?ll.a.Rul hlate Vll08858S R[/MAX Esu.te Prapertln C - 2 3 PastSal11 .S.nglefamllyResklential PastSale Singlefam1lyRHident1al Pait Sale 5mgle family Residential PastSalt 511'!.lefamll>tResidential Pasl5ikt SinglefamilyResidentlal Past5ale SinglefamilyResldentlal PastSak SlngleFaml!vResidential PastSale Slnglefami..,Residential Pasts.le SinglefamllyResidentlal P.1!1tS-llle SingleFam~yResidential P.mtSale Slnglefam1lyResldenltal Past Sllle Single F1mily RR~td11ntial PmtSale Sln&lefam1lyRtsident1al PmtSale SlngleFam1lyR11$ident~ Pasts.le S.ngleFam•lyResldenli.11 PastSa!11 Sif18)eF11milyResldentlal PastSale Sln&leFamilyR11$idential PastSale SlnglaFamllyResidentlal PastSale SingleFamllyResldentlal PastSale SingleF.arnilyResldenllal P;ntSale SingleFamilyResldent~ Past~ Si~F.am1lyResidenllal Past5itle SinglehmilyResldential PastSale Singlef.amilyR.esldent141 P#StSafe SlnglefamilyResidenllal P~t Sale Single family ResidenUal Pi15lSale SlnglefanulyResldential P.astSaft Slnglt-Familyflf!J~ial PastSale Slngiefamily-Af!5identld Past Safe 5mgle Family Resident1ill Past5ale 5ini:;leFamilyAesident1al PastSale 5mglefamilyResidemial Pas!.SalR Singlef.amilyResidentl;il Past.Sale SlngleFamllyResidential PastSaft Slnglef.amllyResldenual PastSate SlncleFamilyResldentlal PastSale Singlefam1lyReiiden1ial PastSate SlnglefamilyRe51dential PM!: Sale Single Famtl'I' ResiMntlal PastSafe SiricieFanutvJ1esidlrn1ial Pm Sale Single Family Aaident~ Past Sale Sinai. Family Residential P.astS.ale SlngleFamolyResldenUal Past5ale SlngleFamtlyResidenUal Pasts.le Slf\&leFamilyResldenUal PastSab! SingleFamllyResld4mUal P<irts.J.SlnaleF~lyResidtti!lal Pan5* SincleFamil,,.Reidem~ PanSalol S.n&k=FamilyResodcntial PontSale 5m&leFarnilyRcsldcntial PartSale SineleFamilyResidential Pa:n5alc Sillik!FamilyResldentlal PllStS.lle Sin&feF.amllyRcsklent1al P&StSale Sl/lflefamilyResldenUal PastSale SingiefamilyResldential P.MtSale SlngleFanulyh$1dentllli P.astSakt SingleFanulyRaident1al Pastsale SindeF.amilyReidentsal f'z.t5ak!Slngl11Fam!lvRes~ial P.ai;tS.la SingleFamilyResldenti<ol Past5ale 5mgleFamilyResldentlal Pa1tSlolle SinglefamllyR.esldemi.al P&StSale S1ngkF.amlly!Wsident1al Pa:rt5ale SingleFamllyResidential Pasts.le Singlef.miilvResidential PmtSale SinglefamdvR~t'tl1till Pas15al• SingleFamdyRl5Kk!nt~ PatSale SingleFanulyRlt'Slden11al PastSale Sl•Fami!vResklenthll Pastsalft SlngleFamilyResdtntlal Pnt5.11e SinglefamilyReidential P.ast Sale Single Family Rmdenti.il PastS.ale SlneleF.amtlyResldential P<1$tSale SineleF.amilyRl!Sldential PztSale SingleFamilyResldenu'11 Pa:51Sale5i11&leF~lyResidentia! PanSale SineleFam1lyResldential Pi151Sale Sinai.FamllyResldenual Pas1Sale 5in&lehm1lyRe:.Jden11.,. PastSale SlnglehmilyResidential Past5ale SinglefamilyRa1dent1..i P.lstSale SingleF.amilyResidential Past5ale SingkFamilyResidential 3.U.8C:RO\Ran.thof'alosVer~ l022 AVEI> Randio Palo' Ver~ CA 71ROC:l(JNR;inchoPalosVerde$ CA 2090AVE1' Ranchg Pal~ Verdon CA 2103CAoiRilndloPalo!.Ver~ CA 2532 COLT Rancho Pales Ver<k5 CA 29340!0\RanchoPa!osVerde-$ CA 6'1/2MUSRanchoPalosVetd~ CA 27959 PAI. llancM Palos Verdes CA 28065 PAL fl~ P.atos Verdes CA 22MELAL llanchoPalosVerdes CA 29 SANTA Ri111thc! Palos Verdes CA 301SOPAL RanchoP•losVerdes 642SVIAtR;anchoPalw.Verdes 99 VANDEi Rantho P;ilos Verdes CA 32214Va:l(RanchoP;i~\lerdes CA 3439C~IRanchoPalosVer~ 3303PAL0RallChoPalos.\lerdes 28l04Lot.RanchoPalos\lerdes 27811 HA'-1 Rancho Palos Verd8 27112ME!RanchoPal«.\lerdes CA 3ll10MAI Jl.ancho P~os \lerdfl CA }.7SAILVtlRanthohlosVerdes CA l Vlir. Del C Rancho Palos Verdes CA S918 OCE.I R;incho Palm. Verdes CA 26 COVE\11 RilnCho Palos Vetdti CA 73188ERRR.anchciPalosVetdes CA 41 SAIL Vll Rat1cbo Palos VenSes 6862 AO& Rancho Palos Verdes 6527 SANt Rancho P.alos Veides 4FIGTRE£ ltanchoP.ak>$\lerde$ 28904SCO Rancho Palos Verdes 2861.S CO. Rancho Palcis Verdes CA 28750 COi. ltilndio Palos Verdes CA 28731 DO\ Randio Palos Verdes 28125 TRA AMlcho Palos Vti"des 21!998ronoP.anchoPalosVerdes 28703 I.EA RMlcho Palos Verdes CA 30058AV[fl.mc;hoPalosVerdes CA 309SSVIA RanchoPalosVerdes CA 28624 CO\ Rancho P.alos Verdes CA 6S PASEO I Rancho Palos Verdes CA 6418\/IAER.anchciP.alosVetdti 6923 HECK llancho Palo~ Verdes 2J76VIST/JlanchoPalosVerdes 2959 CRE5 llancho P.alos Verdes CA l COAOt Raneho Pal<» Veules. CA 3052lPaltJlchP~Vtd 2033Van•Raru:hoPalo$\lerdes 1936 CADl Rancho Palos Veides CA 196] TROL llancho Palos Verdti CA l8706MO Rancho Palos Verdes 2431SPARRandioPal1»Verde5 642lVIACR.anchoPalosVerdes CA 2l35Ckw".a.R.anchoPalosVerdes CA 28800 PAl Rancho Palos Verde\ CA 29131 So\/ Rancho Palos Verdel CA 1851 REOC Ra:mho P•los Veufe CA 1858 TRUC Rancho Palos Vetdes CA 6968AlTAR.1ndloPalosVtfda CA 28520CO\tRandloPalosVerdes CA 30924MAIRanchoP.:dosVer~ CA 30000AVE Rancho Palm Vl!rde. CA 663SOCURiitndtoP.alo$Verdes CA 28822 ROl R.,,cho Palo$ Verdes CA 60470CUltanchoP~V11rde5 CA 60230CEJ:R;MchoPalo$Verdes CA 6761 El RC llilntho Palen Ver~ CA 29015 WAi Rancho Palen \fer~ CA UndlSdolie~PalosVenfe!. CA 28811l£A Raru;hgPalo:.\lerdes CA 28611 CO\ ~cho Palos Verdm CA ~OJALTAlbnchoPalo:.Verde:o. CA 6412 CHAf Jlandio Palen Verde. CA 2824ll081\artchol'.alcsVerdB .28729 ROl ltancho P~los Verd~ 287060RtR.anchoPalinVenle. CA 28733CO'.Ranth0Palll$Ve1del. CA 6958 ALTA Rancho Palo~ Verdel. CA 28410 LW. Rancho Palos Verdes CA 30365 VIA Rancho PalCl§ Verde:!. l0840 VIA Rancho Pa~ Verde:i. 29204 GOt. Rancho Pal0$ Verdes 90275 1459000 90275 785000 90275 799000 90275 899000 90275 6!900:> 90275 8900CO 90275 109500> 9027S 889900 9027S 974900 90275 799900 90275 l14SCOO 90275 1609000 90275 2999000 90275 650000 90275 90275 90275 975000 90275 2195<Xl0 90275 785000 90275 820000 90275 925000 90275 1795000 90275 2199000 90275 90275 2599000 90275 1525000 90275 1175000 90215 2179000 9021S 1160000 90275 1100000 90175 9027> 90275 1199000 90275 980Cm 90275 1099000 90275 77SIXI.) 90275 l-099000 90275 1399000 9C>2J5 1450000 90275 """"' 90275 39SCOOO 90175 1599000 90275 819000 90275 899000 90275 1050000 90215 10880)0 9027S """ """ 90275 475000 90275 """"' 90275 929000 """ 899000 90275 90275 849000 90275 649900 90275 519000 90275 2350000 90275 869000 90275 1659000 90275 939000 90275 817000 90275 1525000 9027S lJSOCOl 902~ 1190000 90275 900000 90275 108SOOO m1s 11soooo 90275 995000 90275 1680000 90275 2500000 90215 1099000 90275 1549()()0 90275 1200000 • 90275 1399000 90275 2548CIXI 90275 859000 90275 1299000 90275 90275 874900 1.75 2.75 L75 3 3.5 rn ~25 2 1.75 7 1.75 1.75 3.25 4.5 5.5 . i15 2.5 rn 3 2.75 L75 4 3 2.5 3.5 "" 1.75 2.5 4 25 l.7S l.JS 25 3.5 2.5 1.75 5 2.25 3.25 25 2.5 1.75 rn 3 3.25 3 us 3 L75 3.5 us 3.75 ,, rn 2.5 2632 1452 1274 J.878 "'' 1991 2429 1918 3317 '"' 1ll55 3866 2191 20!B !!In 1Sl6 "'° m• 6351 5314 2180 2312 "" 2128 ,.,. 2400 "" 2265 2468 2521 1806 '°" 3610 2135 1•85 2076 2110 3952 2471 3655 2029 1'68 1768 2395 1598 ""' 2850 "" 1205 48'5 1985 3777 3152 ,.,. ,... .. "" 3884 2788 "20 ""' 2512 - 4463 ,,.. >435 2741 2952 "'" ""' 2239 831• 47tl31 22131. 6813 lC.029 20622 19052 44278 """ 5200 1.3100 12355 US09 13380 65%9 ssu ,,,, mm 18623 212S7 21742 , ... 1Gl4S 11199 '"4 "'" 13456 10000 8321 •llO 11411 6483 24413 5500 7247 1ll144 14807 21266 11295 7<UJ 21>184 11509 "589 12095 6885 .1016 22l15 8331 14992 12959 1721 7553 .,..., ,.,.. 6171 7015 12445 7891 19642 2£626 10405 .... 14481 7701 21311 ,,,. 7081 9%7 9011 1912 "" 1556 "'° 1961 1956 1956 1951 1979 1985 2006 1956 1920 1960 1961 1992 1962 1'58 1962 .... 2005 1987 1962 1961 1"" 1963 1987 1951 1970 1972 1963 mo 1963 1911 "" 1987 2005 1984 1918 1956 1912 "" 1956 1950 1973 1956 "" "" 1918 1975 1981 1963 1980 1980 1910 1964 1972 19'6 1986 2005 1964 1970 -1986 1910 1960 2 Ga.rag<! 2 G.vaa .. 2 G11tage 2 Garag• 2 Garagt 2 G.irap 2 Gatage 2 GO!fage 2 G.arat• ' 2 Gat381' 3 Gar~• 3 Garag• - 3 Garage 3 G;tJagf 2G"'• 4Gatage 2 Gar;ag .. 2 Garll(e l Gar..gl! 3 Garati"' l Garag"' 3 Garage 3Gar~I' 3 Garagl' 3 Gar.age 2 Ga141e 2 Gara«!' 2 Gar.11ge )Garage 1 Gaf•JC 2 Gara,se 3G.lr-agl' 2 !Urae,e 2 Gar.ai.e 3 Garagf' 2 Garage 2 Garage 3 Garage 3 Garqe 4 Garage 2 Garage 3 Garage 2Garage z Garage 2 Garas:e 6 Garage 2 Gilr:oge 2 2Garage 2 Garage 2Garaee l Gillqe 3 Ganise 2 Garagf' 6 Garage 3 Garil!e 2G¥at:• 2 G.va&I' 3Gat31e 1 Garage 3 Garag• 2 G.iw''fl" 2 G.al'aie 3 Garqe lGarage 3Garage 3 Gare,• 2 Garage 2 G<U":oge 3 Garage 3 Gatage l G.;uage 2 Gal.lllf' 3 G;u-age 2 Gar.1ge 2 Gar;oge 1/2B/20B S 11,'30/lOU S 11,'JO/'Xl12 s 11,'30/2012 s 10/12/2012 s 10,'12/2012 s lt'U/2012 S 2,'27/2013 s l,'10/2013 s G/,#,/2012 s r.t6/2012 s 9/20}2012 s 411/2013 s 6/19/2012 5 9/10/2012 5 6/26/2012 s 2/24/2013 s 2/27/2013 s G/112012 $ 10/25/2012 5 u/11/20n s t0/12ll012 5 618/2012 s 8/2/'2012 s 8/16/2012 s 9/27/2012 s 10/2/2012 s 1/1/2013 s 1/1/2013 s 11/20/2012 s 12/28/2012 s S/21/2012 S 8/22/2012 5 q/7/2012 s 9,'14/2012 s \13/2013 s to/26/2012 s 4/17/2013 s 4/22/2013 s 4/22/2013 s 4/23/2013 5 4/23/2013 s 4,'24/2013 s 4/17/2013 s U/212012 $ lUS/2012 $ 12/12/2012 $ 11/15/2012 5 S/U/2012 S 10/31/2012 s ll/6/2012 s 11/lS/2012 S U/4/2012 5 ll/6/2012 5 l/8/2013 5 3,'22/2013 5 3!22/20111 5 l/22/201'1 s 3.'29~13 s ')/6/2012 s 10/23/2012 s 10/31/2012 5 ll/8/2012 s U/9/2012 S 11/:21/2012 5 1/4/2013 s 1f7/20B 5 119/2013 s 1/14/2013 s l/l.S/2013 5 3/12/2013 s l.'19/2013 5 l/22/2013 $ 3/22/2013 5 3.'22/2013 5 3/26/1013 5 411/2013 s 4f9/20U 5 419/1.013 s 3/19/2013 s flfll/20U 5 7/26/2012 s 9/l.t./l012 s 1,400.900 ht.tp://www.r> Cl<Hlorma Rul Estate P\113011454 R[/MAX E.s.b!e Propert1e5 180,000 http:/IWWN.r> taUfom1a Real Btatc PV1214S847 RE/MAX Estatt PrOIH!rtlu 793,000 http;//www.r> C.alifom1a Real HIM• PVl21460S9 RE/MAX Estate Properties 880,000 http://www.r> Cahfornia R..al hi ate \112114567 RE/MAX EUate Propert!e$ 680,000 http://www r• California RHI bt;n.e 512096434 ShOfewood Realto~ 860,000 http://www.r• Callfornia Real E:.late \112015964 RE/MAX E:.t.ate Prop•rtifls t,050,000 http://www.r• C.allfornia Real Estate SU1250l7 Hun1er Mason Really 88S,OOO http://www.r> California Rl'al hlllli' INU139098 Kelle1 Wllllams Palos \lerde. 930.000 ht.tp://www.r• C.allforni.a Reill E.sla1e 5812110337 Re/Max.Execs RPV 821,100 http://-.ro California Real Est.ate SUQ399S3 R't/Max El!ec:s RPV 1,105,000 l1ttp://-.r> C~Hfomia Rn\ Enate Vll082183 RE/MAX Estate Properties l,S4S,OOO http://www.r. ~Ufom1a Re.al Enate V1208la9S RE/MAX E.stale Propemn 2,100,000 http://www.r. Callfom1a Rtal htiate PV12153104 Keher Williams Palos Verdes 630.000 http:lfwww.r• c:RISNei Ml.S fl2043881 Coldwell Banker Qualit'I' Ptop11ni..s 1..400.000 http:/lwww.r-C....Uforn111 Roi ht.at• 1(12097711 RE/MAX Estate Ptopettle 650,000 h1tp://www.redfln.com/CA/Rancho·Palol.-Verde:i/32214-Val0f-Pl-90275/h~738036 950,000 http://www.I' Cald'ornia Real f.51.tt• PV1212991£> Co:ildw'e11 Benker·PV/lkh. Cltle$ 2,828,000 http://VN!W.1' C..Ufomia ReaJ Ulille 5813018384 Ana1 & Anodat1!$ )GS,000 hllp://WW#.t> C8hform11 Real Estate 512031781 RE/MAX £slate Properties aoo,ooo http://www.r. c.l!fornho Ru! Estate ~12105598 Keller wm1ams Realty 912.500 htlp:/1-.f'o C.allfom!aRul Estoite Vllll579l RE/MAX Esute Propertle:s 1.750,000 http://WWW.r• c.lifomia Re.-1 Esta!• S12031414 EJ.c:i'I Funding R. E.S., Int 2,100.000 http://www.1' Cillfornla Rul bu1te Vl2054314 PenlnsulaSotheby'$ lnt'I EUty 3,750,000 http://-..ntdfm.tom/CA/R.nc~a!os-Verdn/l·Vlil-Del-Oek;>.90275/horrw:/1228041S 2.S00,000 http://wvhv.ro Callfomi11 Re.al Estate 512068496 Shof*Wood Realtors INC l,475.000 hnp:lfwww.r> Csllfornla Real Estate V12054682 Call Realty 1.136,500 http://www.1' C.alllomla Real Estat1! 512069190 Sholl!!wood Reaho~ 2,158,000 http://www.r.C.ailfomlaRealEstat•S.12072048 Ktl!.rWIHJir.msRealty 1.150.000 http://-.r. ~or~ Rti:tl Estatt PV1l01S669 Rt/MAXE:state Properttti 1.050,000 http:/J-w.ro Ca:liforniall.eal Estilllt 12-~75 Keifer Willmm-Sant.a Momca 1,340,000 http:/J-w.r• C:tlifo1n111 Rul Esu1te S812l'J9094 RE/MAX Est.te Propart~ l,075,000 http://www.r> Califom1il Real blah Vl20a5030 Kellet Wil!-Palos. Verde:s; l,120,000 hnp-.//-.t· Callfornl:1Rflal Eslllle 512083973 C.OrMtstone Premier Propertie$ 973,000 http://www.r• Callfomla Real h1ae Vl205386S Kitlt..r WJUiarns Palm Verdes 1.090,000 hnp://wWW.f' Caflfornla Rnl Estillle SUOS9267 Pru!Mntial califomJa Reall'I' 815,000 http://WWN.f> Callfomi• Retl Estltfl PV121534e0 RandaU Rl!ahy 785,000 http://www.redfln.tom,/CA/Rantho-Palos·V•rdti/2899-B«lnco·Dt·9022S/home/77l9436 l,OG0,000 http://www.f'o California R...al Estill• 5813033250 MIUl.ael Barnett Rtialt'I' 1,390.000 h!tp://www.r> Calif~ Rut ht.ie Vlll23669 Rod:.yfi<!ld 1,410.000 http://www.ro CallfO!l\lll Real Estate P\113005240 Peninsula Sotheby'5 l11t1 Riiy 968.000 http://-.fo C:tllfotnla RU} £stat• PV13028081 PNderttlal caufornla Realty l,900,000 bttp://WW#.r· C:tllfomia Real Estate VU106486 Penillsul11 Sotheby'$ Jnt'1 Rlt'I' 1,.550,000 Mtp://www.ro California lle:tl hh•te SSl.3010948 Ann Leuns Realty 900,000 http:J/-.r>C.llfornlaRe:tlhlilteSBl3025659 HormTeamRe.alty a1s,ooo http://www.to C:tllfomla Reil Estate 5UW9797 R't/M.aic Palos Ve1~ Really Inc 1.025,000 http:J/www.r> c:allfornla Re.al Estate Vl2047&9!i COldwtil Bmke1-FV/Bch. Cities 1.088.000 hltp://WW#.r. C:tllfoml;i Real Estai:e PVUl.2B&34 Cotdwell a.nke1-PV/Bch. Cities 150,000 http://www.ldfin.com/WRth·Palos-Vrd/30523-l'.alos-Verdes-Dr·E·'9U2.7S/home/1738S~ 110.000 ht1p:f/.,_.redf1n.com/CA/Rancho-Pal0$·V1t1dg/2Qll-\f11n.K;inJan-Or-90l7Sfhome/1n.'9m 640,000 hup:/1-r> California Real Estatt 512112684 Keller Willams Really !i45,000 http://wwvi.r• California ~al Estate 51212011• Pet.tin. JIG!ty Cel\ttir, Inc 69S,OOO http://www r> OiHfomJa Real Estate 221611746 ht Eagle Realty Group 910,000 http://-.ro Otlifornt.Re.al Eltate Vl2ll&l99 RE/MAX Estate Propl!ltle!. 850.000 hnp:J/www.r> C.aRfomlaR'al Estate V12069791 P.E/MAX Est Ille Propelties 630,000 http:J/www.raod#1t1.cM\/CA,fR:iinmo-Palos·Verdes/21»Dorado-Dr·9027S/home/7730071 810,000 http://WW#.t. Cilifomla Real E:.lat• 12168958 JohnlQrt Corp. 180.000 http://www.r> ~liftm11a Rul ESUJte 5813016&20 The RN! &tale Group &49.900 http://www.ro Califj)mia Real blal:I' 5812150459 Main Street RHlton. 525,000 http://www.to callfomla Real Est.ie S81302!120 Prudential C.allfomla Really 2.330.000 hnp://-11.i.r• California Real Estllte \1120Sl427 /\£/MAX btate Ptopertla !74.188 hltp://www.r> C.alifornia Real Uta:te VUW451 RE/MAX Estill:e Propertin l.360,000 http://www.r. Callfomla Real hi.ate 12·601-415 RE/MAX ESTATE PROPERTIES US0.000 http://-w.t•UllfomJaRealEstate\fl2U47S8 RE/MAXEstatePropertle5 930.000 http://-.r> California Real Est~e S12086866 1\11/Mu: bea Redondo Beach 817.000 http:Jtw-.n Cahfomia Rtial Esl;iite VU125307 Prudential C.llfornla Realty 1.531.000 hnp://www.f> California Real U.tale P\112141797 RE/MAX Estate Propertlti J,652,000 http://ww.~ Califom111 Re:tl Estate S1l<W98 Compass Rul Est.ale 1.180,000 http;//www.to Californ.1.11 Re.i Es\lllt PVl2133010 ~lier Williams Pal~ Verdes Sl1S,o:n http://-w.r. Calif11rn1a Re.i Estate V1211886.S Coldwell B.anker-PV/8ch. cru..s 1,095.000 http;//www.t> Caltfomi<I Real Enate PVJ.2136546 fl.C/MAX Estate Properties 1,080,000 http://www.r. C..ttfcrnia Real Estate SB13009009 Home Teollfll Realty 942.000 http://www.r. C:tllfomia Real blatf P\113025226 RE/MAX Estate Properties 1,638,000 hnp-./jwww.ro C..lilomta RHI E~:ite PV12136384 RE/MAX Estate P1operties 2.350,000 http:/lw-.r. Ollfornt11 Real Estate P832400 RE/MAX Colles;e Park.Realty l,097.000 M1p://www.1' Otllforn141 k11al Est.alt 581~149 Foreast Ruh~ Inc. 1,355.000 htlp://www ,.. California RuJ Es1ate 5812154101 RE/MAX Eslale Pro pert in 1,26.8.800 http-.//-....r> Calllon11:1 Real f$li!lte PV13027~ Coldwl!ll Banker·PY/Bth. Cil:ie!. l.450,000 http;//www.r. c:artfornll R.al Estate PV13044467 F\E/MAX Estllle Properties 2,450.000 http:j/www.r. California Real b1ate \112038779 Coldwell Banker-PV/Bdl. Olin 820.000 h1tp://www.r· Ollifomia Rnl Estate S1i<l96438 Prarmer Pacific Rflalty 1.265.000 httpJ/www.r> Cahforru. RHI Estate \112060808 RE/MAX Esl;ite Propertie:!. 990.000 hltp://www.r. C:tlltomi<1 Real Estate VU070270 RE/MAX Es1ate Propeltles l!60,000 hnp://www.r.CahfomtaA.ti.al htatt Vl 2033832 RE/MAX Estate Properties C - 2 4 P.stsale Slntlefam1lyResid.,nt1a! Puts.ale Smglefan11lyftesident1al PMt s..ale Smcle Family Residential PntS11le Singlefam1lyRnodent1al Pa$t5•le SincleF;imilyRl!5fdl!ntlal Pasts.le SinglehmllyResidentlal Past51le Sin&lefam1lyResidenti.! Pasts.Ht SinglehmllyRe:sllhntlal Past.Sale SingleF1mllyR~ntial Pil5t Sale Smgle f.11mly Rll!SidenUal Past~ SmgleFamilyRestdential Pasts.le Singlefamdyb!oldenual PastS&le 5m&lefai'111lyRes.ldential P.ntSille SinglefamdyRnidential Pa!tSale SinglefamilyResldenUal Past~ SinglefamilyRnldenllal P<15ts.le Slngl!!familyResidentlal PastSale Singlef.amilyResldentlal Pasts.le Single family Resident~ P11$1 Sale Single Family R$dentbl PastSalll S.ngleF•milyResidentoal Past51le SinglefamilyRnident1al PllSIS.le SinaleFarnilyResldentlal P;ntSale Sin&'efamilyfln1dtint1al Pasts.le Stnglef.amilyResidential PntS.le Singlef&nlllyResldentlal l>«1t»leSinglefatrnfyReslcH!ntlal PastSille SinglefamdyResldentlal P•tSale SlnglefamllyRestdantlal PatSale SmglefamilyRl!Stdentlill PastS1leSin&h!flnlliyResidt'~ PastS.ale S.nglefJn'lllyRaidenll<tl PanSale SingleFamilyResldentlal Pasts.le SingleFamilyRaskifflt1al PastSale SlngleFamifyResidentlal Pa5ts.le SiflglefamltyReslden11al Past:sai. SinglefatrnfyResidenlial Pzit s.le Single Family ReMdential Pasts.le SinglefamilyResldentlal Pasts.Jc! SinglefarnilyRl!Sldlffll:.al Pasts.le Slne:leFamilyRnldantlal Pm.t Safe Single family ReskMm:lal P«1ts.loe Sin&leFamdyllfllcM!nt1al Pas.ts.le SincleFamityR~ntial Past~ Slng)efamllyRes~llal PastSale Si~FamilyResidenti.al Pastsale S.J1ilef.amilyR~Uitl Pa:s1Satt Singlef¥nilyResM!enti.i Past~ S.ngll!Familyft~l!nllal Pans.le Single f.amilyR~nUal Pastsale SinglefamilyRes1d1mti;>I Pai.I.sale SinglefamifyRl!'Sldentlal Past.sale Singk!F..mllyResidentlal Pas15M SlncleFarnliyResldential PastSale SingleFamilyResidl!fll.lal Past sale Single family Resident~ Pa!otSale SineJeFamllyResident1al PC$Sale SinsleFatnilyResldent1al P.nt5.ale SlnglefamilyRnidential PastSale SlnglefamilyResident~ Pasts.ale SingleFam1lyResidential Pasts.le S1ngJ.Fam1lyResiden1&al Pasts.le SinglefamilyRllSldenlial PastS.ale SinglehmilyResldenti.Jl PastSale Singlef.amilyl!.esldentlal PastSa.le SingleFamilyRnldenbal Pll)tsale 5mclefam1lyResidential PastSale SmglefamilyRnidtlnliai PastS.le SinslefamilyResldentlal PntSale Sin&lefilmilyRe.sldenti.al Pasl5ale SingleFarndyRalclenllal Past.sale SlngleFamllyResidenllal PilStSale SingleFamilyResldenUal PastSale SinglefamilyResldenti.al Pasts.le Sin&fefanulyRl!'S1dent1al Pai;tSale stngltF.amilyRllSldential PastS81e SmgleFamilyResMil!nt1al Past54tle SlnglefamllyResidential PastS..le SlngleFamdyftflidentlal PastSale SinglefamilyResident1al PMIS..le SinglefamilyResidential Past~ SlnglehmilyRa.klent1al PanSale SioCleFamilyResKlentoal 30727 RUE bntho Pal<>S Ver~ CA 1095 VIA t Rancho Palos Verdes CA 10 CALLE C Rancho Pal010 Verde CA 31003 RUE l\ancho PalD$ Vetde!o CA ~VlADELl'lanthoPalosVetdes CA 30J27Vl.A RanthoPalosVet~ CA 30154 Via Reh Palos V1d CA 7206AV0RanthoPalosVerde!. CA 25 VIA Dfl Rancho Palos Ver db CA 7022STAR Rancho Palos Verdes CA 1115 CAMI Rancho Palos. Verde CA 300S7AVERanchoPalosVerdes CA 28424 GOl Rancho Paloli Ve1dei CA 30918 VIA Rancho P•los Verdes CA 1954WntR.ancboPalosVerdes CA l8700No,-Ranch1;1 Palos Verdes CA Undlsdose Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2033 West Rancho Palos Verdes CA 12Sl W~t fulncho Palo.s Verdes CA 21823 Wt. RoHing Hills Estates CA 28613. MO llandio Palos Verdes CA 1044 REOC. Ranc:ho Palos Verdes. CA 6426 VIA t R.lncilo Palos Ver db CA 3(J(ll1GRJ!RanchoPalosVerdes. 30856VIA RcnchoPalosVerde$ S PACKET I Rancho Palos Verdes CA 5615Mt5T RanthoPilloJVerdes CA 29330STORomnaHillsf$tate!o CA 6303ALTORan.:h<>PalosVerdes CA 68SEABRIR.andioPalosVerdft CA 108 SPINO Rancho PalO!o Verdes CA 5650 SUN~ Rancho Pa~ Verdes CA :!:l CO\IEVI Rancho Palo$ Verdes CA 63S3TARRRanchoPalosVerdes CA 98 YACHT! Rancho Palos Verde$ CA Ul509CO\.RanchoPalosVerdes CA UMHAL RanchoP-'o$Verde!o CA SO VIA MA R•nchoP•los Verde!. CA 5640 WHn Rancho P:ilos Verdes CA S6135cotw Rancho Palos Verdes CA 18 Swtttb Rancho P:ilos Verdes CA 7 VIA LA R• Rancho PalO!o Verdes 5943 PEAC Rancho PalD$ Verdes. 2 PEPPERY Randio P~~ Verde$ CA 9fRUITTRllanthoPilloJVerda CA 4 PACKET I Rancho Palo$ Verdes CA l2PACKE1 bnchoPalo!oVerdes CA 291380ce Rancho Palm.Verdes S7 NARCIS Rancho P.alos Verdes 46 SEA WA Rancho Palos Verdes CA 20 ONNM !Uincho P.alcs Verda CA 27713 HA\ Rancho PalO!o Verdes CA 4364AOM Rancho Palos Verdes CA 6523VERtRanchoP;11lo5Verdes CA 5516 SCOT Rancho Palos Verdes CA 5561 MIST Rancho Pakis Ve.-de$ CA 21119 SHC flancha Pal05 Verde$ CA S3QS. WAU Rancho PalO!o Verdes CA 4110PALORanclloPal0$V~ CA 4030ADM RimehoPalosVerde!o CA 32ll7PWRandtoPal0$Vetde5 CA 3276 DEW llancha Palos Verdes CA 32534 SEA R:incho PalllS Verda CA 31221 GAf Rancho P.ilos \let"~ CA 3332 CORL Rancho P•IM Verd6 CA 30731 GAf Rancho P<1los Ver~ CA 204Sf.A5C.Raru:hoP<1los\lerdes CA 4lU L'<Ul Rancho P<1los Verda CA 33 ROCKJN Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2ooaVISTIRanthoP<1ID$Verdn CA l7GOLOE1RaMhoPalo5Verdes CA 30637 GA1' Rancho P~ Verde!> CA 3545STAR Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2160 VIA (Rancho Palos Verdes CA 26lSSVNtRanchoPalosVerd4s CA. 3822Plll.A°RanthoP.al05Verdes CA 2521 COl.1 Rancho Palos Vl!fdes. CA 40MUSTA RanchaPalllSVtrdes CA 4512 East I Rancho P<1lll5 Verdel. CA 27760 PAL Rancho Palos Verdes CA 20 MARTJt Rancho Palos Verdes CA 3626 COOl Rancho Palos Verd~ CA 3615 Cliff Rantho Palos Verd~ CA """"" 90275 1248000 2850000 90215 90275 4S950CX.> 90275 90275 90275 1399000 90275 46900'.)0 90215 1195000 90275 1050000 90275 2500000 90275 195000 90275 ~ 90275 589000 90275 709900 90275 """" 90275 549000 90275 678000 90274 869000 90275 6S90Cl0 90275 759000 90275 819000 90275 90275 1799900 90275 90275 1245000 90275 1599000 90215 1395000 90275 310000 90275 90275 1'95000 90275 lJOOOOO 90275 91000L) 90275 1595000 90275 1125000 90275 13liOOOO 1099900 90275 1100000 90275 825000 90275 1295000 90215 90275 1300ClOO 90275 1675000 90275 90275 1679000 9QZ75 84gooQ 90215 1250000 90275 1250000 90275 1249000 90275 1000000 1140000 90275 U6500J 90275 929000 90275 16.99000 90275 1050000 90275 999000 90275 1249000 1075000 90275 850000 90275 1090000 90275 90275 879000 90275 1050000 90275 259000 90275 90275 1129000 90215 85COOO • 90275 1275000 90275 1599000 90275 828000 90275 2515000 90275 U90000 90275 739000 1.15 35 6.75 3 3 4.5 2.5 1.75 J.75 1.75 3 35 3..S 2.5 ~25 25 3.5 4.5 2 4.5 3 2.25 L75 25 3 2.25 1.75 L7S 2.75 25 4 1.75 3 L75 L75 3.25 15 1.15 ~25 vs ~" 1.75 ' 05 3 rn 4 2 3.5 4 5.5 1783 3547 '553 ""' 8340 2249 27"1 2650 "'" 2""' '237 2157 ""' 1799 741 1409 140; "'" 1'03 1790 17"5 3<12& 2461 '"" 2830 3721 "" ""'' 2162 1413 22U 3024 4479 -,.., 2397 ''" 3084 2000 2167 14'0 ,. .. 2858 2459 1442 """' 1539 3576 2292 "" '°'' 1941 2061 20ll 3313 2100 1B32 3225 1110 1'89 7088 2042 2074 2531 663 2822 "" "" 3160 "" 2244 2244 U14l 4950 21496 10003 25567 10115 1SBS9 '""' ""' '"" 16062 9050 --""' 6424 7474 5748 12672 G51S 10161 19940 ""'" 11194 9492 13363 ..... 3223 16633 7882 8667 4S30 lOl30 - 10094 10037 27686 25953 4134 41'3 1377 13177 .,.. .,,. 11211 912!1 7912 5109 10451 ., .... 16217 13<1' 12245 "°' 3687 1059' """' ~4950 13307 19420 1312 """ """' 18S71 """' 14241 '"" "" 2004 19'0 2001 1%1 "" "" 2004 .... 1974 ... , 1963 19'0 1955 "'" 1950 1974 1957 1973 1%2 1951 ""' 19'3 2007 1968 1%7 ..., .... 1953 19" 1959 1951 1972 l979 1990 1965 .... 1956 "'"' 1955 1952 1956 "'" 1965 1965 1951 1954 1959 1956 19n 1967 1967 1958 "" 1955 "" "" l962 1982 1965 19fil "" 1953 1959 1955 1984 "" l"" l956 "" "" l961 1956 1979 """ mo 1969 z Garage 2 Garage 3 Garage 2 Garag• 3Garage 2 Garage 3 Garage 4 Garage 2 Gar:ai" 3 Garag .. 3 G...-age 2 Gar;llle l Gilfage 2 Garage 4 Garage l Garngt> 4 GaT.age 2 G;arage 2 Garage 2 Gilfag..- 2 G;iTage 2 Garage 2 Garage 3 G¥'11;e 2 Gar..ge 2 Garage l G;irage 2 G;.irag• 3 GMage 1 Garage 2 Garage 3Garaae 2 Gar;igl! 2 2 Garage 2 G.uage 3 GM.age 2GMage J GMage 3 GM;age 2 G.uage 2Garage 4 Giil(ilJ!e 2 Garage 2 Gar"ll:e 2Ganige 2 Garace 2 Garase 2 Garage 2 Garage 3 Garage 2 Garage 2 Garage 6 G.rage 2 Garill!e 2 Garage 2 Garag:e 2 Gillage 2 Garage 2 G..:'"£l' 2 Garage 3 Garage 2 3 Garage 2 Gar;ig,. 4 G<1raae l Gar413e 2 Garage l Garilll"" 0 7 Garage 3 Gar41ge 2 Gar0«e 2 Garage 2 Gar:;qce 6 Garage 4 Garage 3 Gaiage s Garage Ui16/20D S 11/16/2011 s l.1;'28/2012 5 12/19/2012 s 12{21/20U S 1/8/2013 s 12/U/2012 S 1./10/2013 s 1/25/2013 s 3,'JG/2013 s 3/28/iOU S ~/29/2013 s 4/W013 S 4/16/2013 s 8/3U2012 S 9/10/2012 5 9/J.2/2012 s 9.'lB/2012 5 10/11/:WU S 10/26/2012 s t/18/2013 s 3/15/2013 s 3/27/2013 s 9/13/2012 s 11/26/2012 s 3/20/J/JU S 7/16/20l2 $ 7/20/2012 s 7/3()/2012 s S/30/2012 s 8/31/2012 $ lo./31/2012 s ·~/3/20U $ ;{1/2012 5 9.'14/2012 s 9/11/2012 s 9125/2012 s 9126/2012 s l.J/S/2012 S 9127/201"2 s 1019/2012 s 10122/2012 s 10/22/2012 $ 10122/2017 s 10126/2012 s 11/9/2011 s 12/20/2012 s U/27/2012 5 2/S/2013 s 2122/2013 s 2/22/2013 s 2128/2013 s 3/S/2013 S ?/S/2013 $ 3126/2013 s '/3/2013 s 4/ll/2013 s 4111/2013 s 1/31/2013 s 2!26/20B 5 3/19/2013 $ 3/27/2013 s 3128/2013 s 4/ll/2013 s 4/12/2013 s 4/11/2013 s 4/12{2013 s 10/1/2012 s 1/11/2012 5 1/17/2012 s 7117/2012 s 1/19/2012 s 1/19/2011 s 1/25/2012 5 8129/2012 s 9/1/2012 $ •Jn/2032.S 9/13/'2JJl2 s 9/1'51/2012 s 9/'Jl/2012 s 9r25/2012 S 9/20(2012 s '3/26f201l 5 l,020.000 htlp;//www.r• California Real Estate Vl2119551 R£/MAX Est~e l'ropert•~ 1,180,000 http;//www.r· Califom1a Real Estate VU07S!i22 Cbldwell Banker P.V./Sour.h a.av 2, 710.000 t.np://www.r• Callforrna Rul Est:lte 512103&90 K11l!ar Willi.ms Pall>$ VardfiS 1.240,000 tittp://www." Cilllforma Rut Es1ate SBUl36n.I Shorewood Reali ors INC 4.800,000 http://www.t• California Real Estate V12075908 Coldwell Banker P.IJJSollth Bay 1,030,000 http;//wwvo• Ui!lfotniaJl.eal Estilte TR12129399 C-21 £.N Achievers Re<llty 1,()9(),ooo http://www.redfln.com/CA/Rch-PIJ!os.Vrd/30154-Via-IUvera-90275/horne/1145053 1,375.000 http://www.•· C1llforn1a Ile.I estate V12073225 PenltiSuht Solheby's lnt'l llky 4,500.000 http://www.T> California Jl.eal £slate P835404 Sunnyside Realty & Jn11Ht~nt l,1'35,000 hnp://-.r. Callfonu.a hal Estate P\113024991 RE/MAX Estate Properties 1,175.000 Imp:// __ ,. C.liforn1a Real htaire R.S13040202 NewWtit Real E.na1e 2.~2S,OOO hnrrJ/www.r· California Rul Eslau Vl2085503 JteUtr Williams Palos Verdes 795,000 ht1p:f/l!l'WW.r•Califo1n1aRealE51ate0Cl.302ll158 Pn.ld•ntialCallfotniall.ealty 99S,000 hnp://www.T> CM!forn1• RHI ht ate 13-$48635 Kelll!t Wiiiiams Rlty·Marirnl/lA 525,000 http;//www.ro Uilifo1nla Real Estate 512032539 Re/Max. Exf!a RP\' 680.000 htlp://www.r. Califomla Roi Estate P820905 California Rulty Network 426,000 http://~ ... Clhfornlafl.eal Estate 512095784 Golden West Re1lty SS0.000 http;//www." C.lifornlaRaal btale 512091099 Keller Wllflilrm 8e.adl Oties 678,000 http://www.t> C.llfomla Real Estate VU098689 Keller Williams Palos Ve1des 815.000 http://WW#.f> CMifornia Real b1..te Vl.2002276 Ketler Wllharm Palo$ Vetdes 655,000 hUp://-.ro Cltlfotn11 Real E5lilte PVlllA0083 KeD!!r Williams Palo$ Verdes 781,000 hltp://www.f'I Cahfomia Real Estate PV1l008905 RE/MAX Estate Properties 811.500 hnp:J/www.1> California Re;ol Estate PV13024353 RE/MAX Estate Propeltfe. 970.000 ht1p:/lwww.r• Californl1 Real Est.ate 512085411 Kellti-Willlltms Be-act. Cltie!o 1,850,000 http://www.r. Cafffomla Real Estate VU118873 RE/MAX E51ate Propen~ t.100,000 http://www.1> C.lifornia Re.al £state S812149531 Shorewood Realton INC 1,080,000 http://www.n Cilllforma Real ht.ate VUOG4304 RE/MAX Estate Ptoperues l.D60.000 http://www.,. CaUfomia Rul Estate Vt2007402 The RealEstate GrouP 1,205.000 httpJ/www.ro Califomi.. Roi Estate 5l.20&3167 SOu1h Say Brokers, Inc 1.599,000 hUp:/Jwww.f> C..llfornia R.al Estate Vl.2041712 RE/MA>; Estat• Properties l,300,000 htlp:flwww:t> Callfotma Real £slllll' 511078405 flHI Estate West 77'i.OOO http://www.ro California Real btaie 12·596091 5'eve Uyemura l.400,000 htt.p:flwww ... c.llfortll.I RHI htale V12083109 RE/M>Jt Estate Propertift 888,000 httrr.//www.f> Callfoml• Real htan VUOB9175 RE/MAX Estl1te Properties 1.470,000 http;//WWw.r• callfomla Real £slate 512073947 KeUer WUllams balty LOB0,000 http://www.1> Uillfomla Real E~e 512091812 Shorewood Re;dtors INC 910.000 http://www.r. California Real Estate 512018452 RE/MAX £state Propenle!o 1,530,000 http;//www.r. C..hfomla Real £state VU1S3651 Coldwell Banker P.VJSOuth Bay 1.100,000 htlp:/lwww.f> Califotnl• Real £stat• V12101539 RE/MAX £$lite f'topertlel 880.000 hnp://www.t9dfm.comJWRam:ho-Palos·Vl!l'des/5613-5cotwood-Df·9027S/home/Tl41300 1,020,000 http:/t-.tfffln.com/CA/R.ancho-Palos·Ver~18-Swtetbay-ftd-90275/home/7140317 1,588,000 hnp-J/www.ro California Real Estate Vl20S9217 R£JMAX Estale Propiilt/a 1,279,a65 http://www.r· CHfomia RHI £stall' VU0411JS Prudential California Realty 1.079,000 http:l/www.r. c.llfomia Real Erull.e VllOOOllO keU.r Wlllllm$ Palos Verdes 1,045,000 http://www." ca11fomll Real f$tal:e V12097899 RE/MAX Estate Properties &25,000 http://www.,, California Rul Esl8le 512126187 C-21Arnber Reak~ 1,200,000 httrr.//www.t> CaDfomia Real Estate 512079622 Pacific Land Corporation 'H0.000 http://-.rNfln.COinfWRancho.Palos-Verdes/'2!J138-0teanridge-Or·90275/home/77-41236 1.300.000 hllp://www.r> Callforma Real Estate 5813000136 Team South &iv Realty 1,SS0,000 httrrJ/www.r< Callfornia Ruf Estate Vl2125.473 Keller Williams Palos V~ 1,45:1,750 http://www.r> Uillfomla Real Ena!.• P\1121S4758 Kellti Wmiams P~ Ve«lti 700,000 http:J/www.t> C.lffomia RHI Estat• 512051236 Kelltr WUIJJm5 Realty l.650,00J http://www.f> Cellfon»a Reil Est.;rte 511096099 Padflc Land Corporation 860,000 http://www.r> OilifomM RH! Es1ate SBUJ.54016 RE/MAX Estate Propel'lies 1.200,000 http://www.f> C.llfvrnla Real EslMe PV121S2-4QI Prudential callfomla Realty 900.000 http-J/W##.r• C.llfomla R•al Estate P839531 Coktllllell Banker 8e-$t Realty 1.259.ooo http:.//--ro cahforM Real Estate PVJ.3039830 RE/M.t.X &1ate Propettiu l,075.000 http://www.t> Callforma Real Estllle P\113035428 R£/MAX t.statrt Ptopertift 74S,OOO hnp://www.r• Cahfomla Real Wat• PV13002646 Gf!!erud>eslan 1.098,8.88 http://www.ro Caltfomla Real Estate IG1300ll61 Grtffln Real Enate, INC. 1,140,000 http://-.r· California Real Estate P\112121"65 RE/MAX Estate Properties 1,000,000 http://w-." CallfornUI Rul Est.Me PV1301945l RE/MAX Estille Properties 1.140,000 hnp://www.t> Uifrft11ni1 Real Estate SB13009366 Shorewood Real\otS INC 1.oso.000 tittp://www.r. Ca!llom1a Real £state S81.306S453 Be-ach City Brokers 991,000 http://www.ro Citllfornla Real Estate 5812130024 The Real Estate Group 1,310,000 hup;//www.t> C1Ufo1wa R11aJ Estate PV13040703 Peninsula Sothtby's lrifl Rlty 850,000 ht.tp;/fw-.r. Ca/lforn1111 flea! Estate SBl2149449 Maupin Realtors 800,000 hUp://www.ro taliforrna Ruf Estate 512085897 Bane!d R~y 1.090,000 ht.tp://-.r. C.l!forrua RHI Estill• V12060978 R!:/MAX ht•e Properties 3,300,000 http://www.r• California Real Estai:e V120304ll PeniruirlaSOthllbv's lnl'I Rltv 810,000 http://WWW.f> Call!ornla lteal Estate 512073056 Shorewood RealtoJJ 835,000 http;//www.r• Callfornta Re.al Estate VU07.2832 llE/MAXEs1ate Properties- 950.000 http://www.r. C..l!fornla Real Estate 511081.048 Keller Wiiiiams Realty 200.000 http://www.ro California Real Esuite S1204S24S C·21 Amber R•:ilty 1.250,000 http:l/www.,.. Ciillfom1a Real hta!e N1102874S. MeGraw R.alty 1.055,000 http://www,.. California RHI Enatt P826160 Main Sttel!t Realton 850,000 http:l/www.,. California Rul Es late SU1U409 St.aradatd flea! Estate 5er11.ciis 1,275,000 http://www.n California Real Estate 512074661 Kl!llef Williams Rl!.alty l.S.10,000 httpz/IWW111.t> California Real Est at• Vl2044872 RC/MAX Estate Propert~ 828,000 hllp;//www.n Callfomla Real E!otale Vl2099815 Kefter WWI.ams Palos Verdes 2.335,000 hnp;//www.r• California Rul Estate Vll0:52186 c.ollhltell Banltu P.VJSOU1h Say 1.190.000 http://www." California Real Eslo11e 22165002 sotheby's lntemat!onal Realty 159.500 http://WWW-r· California Real ($late 512021802 Keifer Wltnams Beach Cities C - 2 5 PastS..le S1naleFamllyResidential Pastsale Sl11BlefamilyResiden1ial Pas.tS;lle Sm&lvF4lmtlyftei;ident14ll P.l!StSai. StngleFam1lyRestdent1al PastSa!e SinglefamllyResuiential PastS..le Singl1FamilyResidential P;istSale Singlef1rmlyRestdenti;il PastSale S111glefamjlyAie:sidential PastSale Slng!ehmilyResldentlal Paost:Sale Singlefarnilyllt5identlal PastSale Stnclefamilyllesidenti.11 PastSale Stnglef.,ooyRes~nt1al PastSale SmgktfamilyResld•nual PaostSale SingleFamilyRestd•ntial PastSale $ing}eFamilyResidentlill PastSale SingleFamilyResldentlal PastSale SingleFamilyf!fltdentlal PastSale Slnait'familyResidential PastS..le Slnglef.:tmllyh$idential P•tSale Sin&JeFMnilyRasldent1.al Pasts.ale SingleFamllyRa.idetl1i.al PastSale S1ngl.Fam1tvResiden11al Pasts.le SlnglefamllyResldenlial PastSale si•FamllitResldential Past Sale Sinch' F.amity Ro!!ildentlal Pastsale SinglefamllyRl!!ildenlial PastS* S1n1iefamilyResidentUll Past~ Sln&leFamilyRt!$ldentiili PastS.:tle Slng)eF.amilyResichmtl.al PastS..ltt Sl,,.iefmiilyResidenti;al PastS.ale StnglefamilyRtsKfential PastSale-Sing/lrfamilyRffidenti.al Past5ale SlngieF.mi1yResldenuill Pi1$lsale SlngieF.amilyRasidentJal Pasts.ale SinglefamllyResidential Past Sale Single hmdv ResiMnt1a1 PastSale: SlnglefamilyResidenUaa PastSl!e Slnglef.lmilyResidentlal PastU. St111leF.amllyRntdenti;ol Past.sale Sin1lefamtlyResident~ Pastsale SlngleF..rnflyResidentiitl PastSate SlnaleFamilyResidential PastSale SingleF.amilyResldenu..I PastSale-SinaleFamliyResidentlal PastSale SingleFarnilyRe:oldentlal P;ntSale SintleF.arnlfyResldentlal Pans.le SincleFamilyRestdentl.al P.a5tSale S111gllt!FatrulyResldential Pa.tSale SingleFaimlyRes1clenu.al PastSale SmglefamdyResldential Pas«SM SinglefamilyResidefltial Pasisale Sln&lefamlfvRe5kfentlal PastS:deSingie-f.amilyResidenttal P;ntSale S'mglefamllyResldent1.al Pasts.If! SinglehrnilyReidenti.al PastSale SlllgiefamllyResidentlal PastSale StncJeFamliyResidential Past~ Smgllt!FanulyRe-skk!nlial PastSale SlnglehmilyRf-$.ldenU.al Past Sale Single Family Rt!!Jdent1:il PastSale SingleFamityResidential Past5a!e Slnglef.amilyResldential P~ Sale Single Famdy Rt:Sidenual Past sale Single Family Resiftntial PanSale Sin,glefMitilyResidentiaf P~~e SlncJ9F.-nidyRes..-nti.al Pas.ts.le Si•FamtlyResidelllial Pat Sale 5mglor! Famdy Resldent1al PastSate SlngJefamllyResldentlal P.zstSate Singkfamilyllesldentlal Past.sale SlngleFamllyRnidentli!I PastSale Sirig)efamilyResidential Palt~le SingleF.amilyRnidential Past Sale Single Family ResldenU.:tl PatSalo Sing)efamilylle$idential PastSale SinglefamliyResldent1;al PaslSal11 S.ngleF~ilyResidenllal PZitSale Single FamilyRe~ldentJal Pastsai. Sif111eFmiilyResldenUlll PanSale Single-Family~idenllal Past Sale Smile Family Rl!Sldenual Pi1$tSale Stnglef.am1lyResiden1iaf P.as.tSale 5m.:leF.lmtlyResidential 29075 CL£' R.ancho Palo~ Verd6 CA 37!.4 FAlC· Ra/'lcho Palos Vet'deS CA 43Zl E>cUl R.an~ho P.alc» V11tdti CA 3510 COOl Rancho Palos vercks CA 3255 PARIC R.ancho P;ikn. Vercks CA 4049 STAL' Rall(OO Palos Venies CA 4245 AOM Rancho Palos Ve1de!. CA <t12S DAUf Rancho Palos Verd6 CA 3520 SENt Rancho Palos Verde!o CA 29048 PAL Rancho P.alos Verdes CA 3648 VIGll Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2939 CRO'll Rancho Palos Vet'des CA 2410 COLT Rancho Pa~ Verdes CA 48 CAYUSE R.:tncho Palo$ Vetcle!. CA 29911 KN( Rancho Palos Verdes CA 30816 RUE Rinc:ho Pall>$ Verde. CA llZ2GAU<RenchoPalosVerde CA 21109PU..R.lnchoPalosVerdes CA 3086 DELLI Rancho Potlos Vet des CA 6 Cldle Vie R.:tncho P.:tlo$ Vet"de$. CA U43Cll;O\RanchoP.lkn.Ven!.5 CA Z036 WW Rancho P.:tlos V111des CA 2155 W Gt Rancho Palos; Verde CA 2611 Colt I P;ilos Verdes Pemnsul;i CA Z7601 PAL R.-:ho Palos Verda CA 2744 Cota! Rancho P.alos Verdes CA 30611 TAR Rancho P.alos Verdes CA 53AVENl0Rancho Palos Verde!. CA 28024 [ii$\ RMl<ho P~ Verdes CA Z102 CAO( Rilintho P.:tlos Verdti CA 2175"Ez.iflandtoP.alosVerdes CA 2802SCAl.ltanchoP<t!osVerdes CA 650SVIAChnchoP41!.»Vet"de5 CA 1952 TRUC Randtc Palos V~ CA 21040WRanchoPalosV11rdes CA 1933 UPLA Ratlebo P;ilos Verdes CA 2027 YELL lbl'ltho Palos Verdes CA 640SVIA(RanchoPalosVerdes CA 2155 FA/RI ftancho Palos Verdes CA l&ZSVAll ftanthoPalosVer.S.S CA 1852 rRut Rancho Palos Verdes CA Undh;ck!H RiU!dio Palos Verdes CA 20Z4 WIHt Rarn:ho Palos Verdes CA 2289SPARRanchoPalosVerdes CA 28601 MO Rancho P.alos Verdes CA 5738.SCOl RandtoPalosVerdti CA 5726 SUN~ R41ndlo Palos Verdti 1814SANlR.mhoP.:tlosVerde5 1.65URftE'fR.allthoP~osVercln CA 29348 STO Rolling Hilb hlolte5 CA 2781'1 PO~ Ranc;ho Palo$ Verdes CA 1922AV!t. Rancho Palas Vercles CA 2024 REDC Rancho Palos Verdes CA Z9ll0 QW lloll'!l'lg Hiib. &.tat.es CA Z94USEARanchoPalosVe1dt!. CA l928AVU. Rancho Palos Verdes CA 3441 NEW lbncho Pak:ts Verdes CA 29Z6 CRm Rancho Palm Verc11!5 CA 3 ALSERO • Rantho Palos Verdes CA 30035 GR.I Rancho P<tlos Vet'clti CA 9 D;:m10f/l Rancho P.fk>l Verdes CA 6519 SANt Rancho P~ Verdes CA 6 SURREY I Raneho Palos Verdes CA 29916 AVE Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2158 West Rancho P.fk>l Verde!. CA 1433 CA[I( lbncho P.fk>l Verdes CA 2212VIA .. RandioP.alosVerdes CA 5323 WAU Rancho P.alos Verdes CA 28447 CEO ltancho Palos Verde CA 28067 SAN Rancho Palos Verdes CA 28619 PlA llilncho Pales Vetch!$ CA 6616 MAO Rancho Palos Verdes CA 6104 SCOT Rancho Pakts Verdes CA 27975 PAl i:tancho Pakis Verdei CA 30221 KIN• Rancho Palos Verdes CA 31131 PAL Rancho Palos Verde, CA 30259 Eau Rancho Palas Ver~ CA. 4206 STAL' Randie Palos Ver~ CA 3558 BENC Ra<idlo Palos Vet~ CA 3Z413SEA R.tnchoPalosVerde!. 346SHER(RarichoPalosVerdes l420C001 R.:tntho Palos Verdes 32227 PH> Randio Palos Verde 90275 1375000 90275 898900 !K>Z75 10Z9000 90275 99500) 90275 869000 90215 919000 90275 939000 90275 1149000 90215 849000 90215 999000 90275 1279000 90275 """"" 90275 1039000 9027S ~1000 90275 775000 90275 849000 90Z75 1495000 90275 1425000 90275 699000 ""'' 90275 90275 1195000 90275 90215 959000 90275 1099000 90275 919000 90275 769000 90215 751000 9G275 729000 1.195000 """"" 9027S 880000 90275 679000 """ 90275 810000 90275 """"' 90275 795000 90215 819000 90275 740000 90275 650000 90275 """"' 90Z7S 639000 90275 97SOOO 90275 1Q99000 90275 674900 90275 1000000 30275 1150000 90275 735000 90275 609000 90275 679900 90274 1319000 90275 1248000 90Z75 699000 90275 1195000 92075 1199000 9027S 1799000 90275 1295000 90275 90275 999000 90Z7S 950000 90275 1050000 90275 729900 90215 8'5000 90275 995000 799500 90275 989900 90275 815000 90275 1195000 90275 919000 90275 949000 90275 940000 90275 699888 90275 1350000 """ 90275 90Z75 1250000 90Z75 ll(l(JOC() 90275 889000 90275 1100000 90Z7S ll.90000 2.75 2.25 2.5 LIS 2.75 ' 2.5 45 L75 2.75 L75 ' '·" L75 "" L75 2 1.75 2.25 L75 L75 1.75 2.5 L75 2 2.75 2 2.25 35 1.75 . 2.75 2.75 2.15 2 ,,, 3.5 3.25 3 3.5 1.75 ' 1.75 '·" L75 L75 25 1.75 3 ..• ' •.25 L'S ' 2.5 ' 1520 3782 2551 1'21 2793 ""' 1865 , .... 1615 2'152 3707 "" 2695 2500 1659 """ '891 "" "'"' 1250 """ 2800 '''" 2086 3ll7 ""' 1774 1735 "" 3189 "" 2596 1736 1146 1375 1632 2314 1481 2301 1409 2!70 "" 1756 1146 ,,.. 1790 "°" ,,.. .... Z77l m• 3956 31n 4659 """ 1956 "" "'' 3070 1459 1442 2016 1816 2660 1925 2553 5000 mo "" '°'' """ 2244 2054 12515 14627 "''"' 11754 1Jl386 11'90 9909 21246 .,.,. 265n """' 6518 "" 21459 22105 "" 10342 ''"" 27904 2l260 1'"" 8722 IA910 8476 11337 1140S "" .,., 2082 7791 6069 23471 ,,., "" l.1751 8744 "'" 10511 14958 "'' ""' "'"' 14154 16620 ""' -1 ""'' ""' •m ""' 6712 1243& "" 12476 ,,.. 8135 21488 "" 15103 63481 8'50 .,,. 16388 ,..,, 11110 "" 1970 1%0 196' 196o 196o 1956 1960 1965 "" 19'0 1968 1917 1973 .... 1960 2003 1975 l9SS 1955 1965 1957 1957 1955 1953 195' ..., ..,, -1950 196, 1956 1958 ""' 1955 ,,., 1959 1955 1959 "" 1"' 19S8 l"" 1964 1959 "" 1962 "" .... 1959 1%1 1964 "" '"" 1964 "" 1954 <962 ..... "" 1'61 ""' , ... 1962 196' 19'1 1~73 2012 195' .... 1975 1960 1964 1"' 1971 """ ""' 3 Gar.tg• 2Gar ... e 2 Garage 3Gar4e 2 Gar.;ige- 4 Gar<11e 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 G ..... 2 G.ac.aae 2 Gai.age 2 GM.:tgf' Z G.aHlf,f' ZGMage 3 Gitfitie 2 G¥age 4 Garage 2 G;nie 6 G;wage 3 Gar.age 2 Gar41ge 10 G.ar<tge 4 Gar.ase 2 Garage 2 Garage ,.,, ... 2 Garage 4 Garage 3 Garag .. 2 Gar.age 2 Garitge 2G~e 2 Gara;e 2 Gar.:tge lGaraae 2 Garage ::Z Garage 2Gar~ ,..,,.. ,....,, 2 G_. 2 G.ar.age 2 Gar.t1e 2 Gar.t1e 5 Gar.ag• 2 Garage 1 Garaae 4 Gar:qe 2 Gar;ia;e- 3 Garage 3 G.arqe 2 Gar.ce z Garace 4 Gar:ig" , ...... 2 Garage 2 Garage 3 Garage 2 Gara.ge lGarace 3 Garai:e 3 GMiill:• 2 G111a1e 2Garqe 2 Garage ZGar11ge 3 Gan1ge :; Gar.age 4 Garage 4Gala,e 3 Gar.as• 7 Garaee 2 Gar;,ge 3 Gar;aae 2 Garage 6 Garage 3 Gilf<ti:e 2 G;orage 9/28/2011 s 9/'28/201.2 s 10,'17/2012 5 10.'Z6/2012 $ 11/26/2012 s 12/18/2(112 s 12.'Z8/20U S 12/21/2012 s 12/U/2012 S 117/2013 s 1/16/2013 s l/l&/2013 s 1/11/2013 s l/18/2013 $ 1'25/201.l s 1125/2013 s t'lS/2013 S l'Ul/2013 s 10116/2012 s 1131/lOU S 9118/2012 $ 10116/2012 5 U/19/2012 S 5114/2012 s 10/30/2012 5 1/22/1013 s 3/19/2013 $ •/3/2013 5 4f2J/20l3 s 1110/2013 s 1115'/2013 s 2/26/2013 s 2127/2013 $ 2/21/2013 s :V6/2013 s 3./8/2013 s 3/13/2013 s 3/13/2013 $ 4/8/WU S 4/12/2013 s 4/Ul/2013 $ 4/lS/2013 $ 4/19/2013 s 5il6/20U S !>{8/2012 $ S/22}Z012 5 6/29/2012 s &12sna12 s &/14/2012 s 8/14/2012 $ 5/11/2012 s S/11/2011 S t/14/2012 s 6j21/2fil.1_ s 6/21/201Z S 8/24/2012 s S/2/Z012 S W21/2012 s f,/29/'1JJ12 s 8/1/'1.-012 $ '131/20125 5/20/2012 5 >/30/2012 5 ~/11/2012 5 5/4{Z012 s J/f;/2012 5 5/8/2012 S ~16(2012 s !~72/'lJJU S !~'14/201:! s rl/'IS/2012 S ~,'12/2012 s tl/10/2012 s fi/23/2012 $ S/4/2012 $ !>/15/2012 s S/23/201'1 S f\115/2012 5 1~12112012 s 719/2012 $ :'tD/2012 S 8/3/2012 s 8/23/2012 s 1.287.SOO http:Jjwww.r Califoml11 Real Estate V11110425 RE/MAX Estate Properties 1,375,000 http:!/www.r. C.:Jilfomill RHf Es.tale VU107424 KeUer WIJlilllTl5 Palos Verd~ 870,000 http://www.ri Califorrua Re<tl £Stolte !12007639 Cab Rti.altv m,OCO hllp://www.roCalffotrnaRe.al Estate SlZ088919 but Re.ahy EllP~rU 920,000 http://www.ro California lluJ Estate VU117661 Prudential Yllfornla Reilly 951,000 http://www." California Re.al btat' PV12133994 Penit1$ula Sotheby's lnt'I Rlty 910.000 h1tp;//www.ri C;ihfomia Real Estate P\112127619 Coldwell B.anker P.V./South Bay 900,000 http://-W.f' Califomit !\.eal Estate PV1Zl34iaS Keller Williams Palos Ve1dH 1,149,000 hllp://www.f' California RHI Estate PVU151042 RE/MAX Estate Propenies 833,000 http://www.f' C.llfornl11 Real Estate PV12tA1193 Kellet WIUl.1ms P.al~V .. rdeos l,087.500 hnp:J/www ... Califoml.:t Rnl £stat• PV12l41103 coklwell B<tnker P.V./SCwth e..v 1.250.000 'ht!p://www.n Callforma Reel btaie PV12137101 RE/MAAEsta1eP~rtin SOS.000 http://www.r California Re.al E$l..ate PV12130721 RE/MAX Est.ate Properties 1.025,000 http://WW*,. Callforn1.a Rn! Estatr Vl.2069398 RE/MAX Estate Propert!D 1,Ul4,000 hUp;J/-.,, California RHI Estah PV12145754 RE/MAX Eslate Properties 970,000 http:}/-·" ealifornl.a f\eal Esta1.e 512097344 Re/Max Ex-ea Rtdondo BeiKh ns,ooo Mtp:/Jwww.,, California Roi Enate V12070883 RE/MAX Estate Properties 890.000 http://www." California Real Estate 5812136712 Shorewood Realtors l,450,000 'nttp://www r• Celifomla Real Estatt V12110282 Kelle1 WiUiams P.alos Ven!M 1.800,000 http:/Jwww.ll!dfln.tom/CA/R4I1,ho-Palos·Vetdes/6-Calle-Viento-9027S/home/81122S9 t.37S,SOO http://-.r> California Re.ti Estate V12008247 RE/MAX Estate P1opertles 69Z.000 htlp://www ... Callforma Real Estato Vlll0583S Killf'olA. Glover, Realtcn 530,000 http://www.redfln.wm/CA/Rmd10-Palos·Vetdll!$/2J..SS·W·Gene-fll.St·9027S/horne/77333!1 1,035,000 http:/lwww.redfln.mm/CA/P.tlos-Verdu.Pentrisulil/2811-Coh·Rd·90275/home/7733017 1.1%,SOO http://www.r> California Re..J Estate 512096932 Milllpln Raalll)/j, 780,000 http:J/www.r..dfin.com/CA/Rencho-P.M·Verde$/27"4-Coral·Rldge-Rd·90275/home/773304.3 959,000 http://wNW.,, Califomi.a Rnl ht;ite PVU14.S962 RE/MAX Utllle Pr~rtles 970,000 http:/fw-.r. Califami1 Roi Estal• PV13028992 R[JMAX Estlllle Properties 863.000 http://w-.r. C.lifom11 Roi Estate P\113032547 Prudential California Re.tlty 750.000 hllp://www.r> c1ltforni.t Real Es1at• P8212SD Coldwell 8anb1 S.t Re.ally 735,000 http://www.r> California Real Es1ate 512104026 The Rial E51ate Group 710,000 hrtp:/Jwww.f' C.lifornla Real Estate 512123102 Keifer Wtlliilm Re.tty 1,138,000 http://W#W.r> California Rul Estate Vt211671S Keller WUliams Palos Venli!:!i 710.000 http://www.,. Callfomi• Ru! Estate PV1300184.3 RE/MA>c Estau Properties 891.000 http://-.,, callfomla Real Estite PV1300S021 Kelh!r WilllaR1$ P.alos venm 715,000 hnp-.//www.n callfoml.:t Real Esrate P\113010150 flE/MA>c Est111e Prupertil!:!i 73S.OOO http;//www.r> California Real Estate PVlJOl-4923 R.E/MAX Estate Propert1111>1 810.000 http://-.r. caltfomla Real Estate S813007"31 Pelet$ Re11ty ~ter, ~ 720,000 http;//-.P Califomi:a Real Estate PV130209Sl Keller WHllams Palos Verdes 195.000 hup:/'-.f\ Califoml.a RHI Est.ate PV130297Sl RE/MA>c Eslate Propertitl$ 810,000 http://w-.r· callfomlt Re.ti Estate 58130293&1 Kelle<' Williams Reatly 710.000 http://www.r> California Real Esl.tte 511022150 Re/Mu [)!ea South Bay 690,000 http://wWw.r> CallforniaR.eal Estate PVl.3021290 Prudt',ntial C.llfomla Realty 675,000 http;//www.P California Real Estate Vt20(J4<t79 R£/MAX Estate Properties 615.000 http://www.r>CalifomiaRealEstatO'Sll1S2481 S<111thB1tyHoml!5 1,000,000 http:/fwww.t• California Re.ti Est.tte VlW36482 Prudentl.tl C.allfornl.aRealty 1.068,000 http://www.r• California Real Estate-V12058028 RE/MAA Estate Properties 650,000 hl.tp:IJWWW.f'ClllfornlaRHIEsl:at• P820065 Atlantk.& Padf«: Real Estatl! 960,000 hltp://www.f' CalifOmtil Real Estate 12158538 Mid>.llel Wyrzykowski l,100,000 htt-p://www.f' Ctlifomia Real Estate Vl2064718 RE/MAX Estate PrQJMrties 735.000 http:/lwww.r. CRISN.t MlS F1203245S Paul Heiben. 609,000 http://www.r. Callfomla R.•111 buite V12039050 RE/MAX Estilte Properties 665,000 http:J/www.ro California Rnl Est.ate Vll.062863 Coldwell Banker P.V./South 8:iy 1,285.000 http;.//.,,_.r, c.allforma Real btai" Vl2044683 Rf/MAX Estate PropertiG 1.185,000 http:/Jw-.r> caufomi.:t Real Estate VU019097 REJMAX E$1111.e Properties 680,000 http:l/www ... Callfomta Real Estat• 512071'968 ICell.r Wlllialm Realty t.tS0.000 http://WWlll.f' c..alilomt• Real E$1ate Vll160577 RE/MAA Estate Propert."1$ l,050,000 http://www.ro CAfffomi.:t Real bt.i11:f W11112694 EMEftALO REALTY,lNV.INC. 1,818,000 httr.://w-.r· California Real £state v120snn RE/MAX Estate Properties 1,200,000 http://¥1-.r· c,Ufornla Real Estate Vl2003837 RE/MAX Estat• Propert!G 2,160.000 http://wWw.re-dfln~om/CA/Rancho-Pa!~· Verdes/g.Oiamont•ln·90Z7S/home}7738602 9SO,OOO http://www.r• California RHI htitle V12062119 Kother Williams P.ak:ts Verdes 915.000 http:/lwww.r> Callfomla fl•al Eslat" 512041646 Ericson Buch Real Estate 98S,OOO http://.,,._.,, ailifomla Hui Eslate H1202S375 ReMa.lOOO Rutty 698,000 http:/Jw-.r> catlfomia Real Estate-512002255 Prudentral Callfom1.a R~.alty 16S,OOO hnp.J/www.r> Olifomi.a Real Est.ate Sl2049739 Keller W1Uwm Realty 900.000 http:/lwww.f' CRISNei MlS FlZ007200 G!onerill Realty Grot.lp,lnc. 773,000 http:/Jwww.n Califomia Rnl ht.ate ¥12032795 RE/MAX Estate Properties 985.000 http:/Jwww.r> Cellfomla Rul Estate \'12040097 Prudemfal Callfomla Re.thy 765.500 http://www.r> California 11.aal Eslate V120546S3 REJMAA Estale Propertlel 1.155,000 http://www.r. Callfomla Real Estate 512003543 lei!ller WlllillmS Realty 900,000 http://www.r> Catlfomia 11.nl htate Sl2:055296 RE/MAX Estate Properties 981,000 http://v,w.,,,. California Roi Est.lte Vl20734l:l9 Coldwell B.tnker·PV/Sch. Cities 700,000 http:}/WWW.r• Catlfomia RHI Es1ate R1201412 Keller WJIUmg Re.ally 681.SOO http://www.r• Callft>nllaRul ES'.:tle V1201460l RE/MAX Estate Propert!D 1.!40,000 http://www.r• Ca1ifomia Re•! Estate VlZOJl184 RE/MAX Estate PropertlC$ l,730.000 http://www.1> C..llforma Real Estat• 51Z006677 Shontwoad M~;iltors 835,000 hup://www.r• Calllornla Real Euat~ 51203180S Re/Max Uea RPV l,153,ltO http://-.,. C;allforni.a Real Estat.e VU045248 RE/MAX &late Ptopenies 1,050,000 hnp://www.r. tallfornla Rul Estate S12041162 Re/Max Ex.ea Redondo Beach 855,000 http://www.r. Califomiil Real Euate 512069181 Keller WUfiams Beach Cities 1,100.000 http;/Jwww.n cslifornla R+.al Est.ate Vll0188U C:ildweH aanker·PV/Bch. Cit1~~ 1.150,000 ht!p://www.,, C.:thforrn.:t Real Est Me V12079683 RE/MAX Eslale Properties C - 2 6 P;u;t.S..1111 5i11&leF01milyResldent1al PastSale 5inclehmilyResid4!n!ial Pasts.tie S11iJlefamilyRl!Sidential Pa$1S;ile SinglefamitvResodential PastSale SinglefamilyResidentlal P.irstSale S1nglef01milyResldent1al Pans.le SlnglefamllvResidenttal PastSale SinglefamilyResident1al POtStSale Si11aleF01milyll:e:sidtnllal PastSale SrnglefamifyRuide:ntlal PllStSolle SinglefamilyR~enlial PilltSlllll Singlef01milyRcident1al P~s.Je SinglefamilyResidential P;ostSale S11igleFanulyRes1dent1al Past~ Single Family Resldemlal PztSale Singlefamllyflesldenllal PastSale Singlefamlly"Resldential Pill!tSale SingleFamllyResidential Pasts.ale SingleF;imilyResldftKial Po11StSale SinclefamilyResidenUal Past Sale Srncle Famtly RH!dentlal Pa!itSale SingleFitIDilyResidenltal PntSlile SingleFamilyResldential Pasts.le Singlefam1lyRu~ntlal Pastsale SincleFam~yResidentlal PastSale Slftf:lef.milyR1!$idenUal PanSalt SlncleFamdyResidenttal Pan~ SlnglefamilyResldtntl.al Past~ Sinclefamito,Residenlial Past.sat. SingleFamilyResident1al PastSaJe SingJefamilyRestdent1al Pans.le srnclefamllyResldent1al Pastsalt' S1ngleFamllyResident1al PastS1le SinglefamilyResidentlal PastSalfl Slngie'F•mllvRe.sulen1ial PastSllle Single-FamilyResldential Pa:lt.Sale Sln&iefamitvResiden!lal PastSale SlngltFamilyResidenllal P;ostSalc SinglefamilyResidenlMll PllSls.le Slr,gleFamalvR!l'SKll!nt1al Pasts.le SingJ.FarnllyResidentlal Pan.SN SlngieFMnllyResldentlal Part~SirtgleF.amilyRestdenUal PastSale SingleFamilyResldential Past Sale Single Fvnity ~ldl!nual Pa:lts.ie Slnglef.amilyResldtnllal PastSale Sinclehmito/Rl!Sidentlal PastSale S.ncleFamdyResident1al Pasts.ate Sinslt:FarmlvRnidentral Pasts.Ii! SingleFamrlyResident1.tl P.astSale SincJeF.mifvRnidential P.asts.11! SlncleFamllyResidential P.nts.Je Singief.miilyRt$idential PitSts.le SlnglefamllyResM:lential Pasts.le Sln&JeFamllyResM:lential P;ogSale SinclefamllyResldl!ntial P.11$tSale Slnck!Famll\iR~enrlal P.astSale SinglefamtlyResident1al Past~ SlngleFamllyResldential P.artS;ile SlngkrhmilyResldenUal PastSllle SlnglefamilyResidenti.111 Pas1Sale SmglefamllyResidentlal Past S..le Single family Raide..wl PastSale Slnglef.amllyResidential Past.sale S.n,lefamilyRaidetlliill PastSale sm,JehmdyResidet111al PntSale SlngleFl111111yResldential PastS.1111 SrniJeFamilyRl!Sulenllal PastSai. SinglefamtlyR..sldentbl PastSale SinglefamilyR..sidential P.sts.le SinglefamilyResldem:lal P1t515ale-SinglefamllyResidenual PastSale SlngleF;imilyR1!$1dential PastSale SincleFamifyResldential PanSale SineleFamilyRestdan1.1al PastS..1111 SingleFamilyResident1al P.stSale Sinclef..mllyRnidential Pas1S..le SinglefamilyResident1al Past5•le SinglchmilyRes~ntl.111 PastS..le Slne;k!FamilyRl!Sidential Past S..le Sincle Fam~ ResidenUal PastS..le SingltfamdyResident•al Pas1S..le Sl~Fam~yResidenual 30073 AVE Rancho Pillo!. Vt=r~ CA 1~ GOlDEI Rancho Palm. Verdes CA S4S4LEBl..tRanchoPalosVerdes CA 6805ALTARanchoPalm.Verde!> CA 68~3 VAU· Rancho Palos Verdes CA 30322 Rlw Randto Palos Ver~ CA 30150 MA. Rantho Palos Verdes CA 30317 RHC Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2818COLT Rancho Palos Verd~ CA 6520 VIAL Rancho Palm Verdes CA Ul2ll HAZ Raacho Palos Verdes CA 27521 Tan Rancho Palos Verdel CA 30907RUERanc.hoPal0$Verdes CA 2NwolaCRanchoPalosVerdes 412lMIR.IRanthoPalosV1Hch.s 30130Vla Reh Palos vrd 7287BERRRanchoPalo$Verdes 6415 Via C Ranc.hn Palos Verdes GlRoot/NRanthoPalosVtrdes ~lftCLE'RanchoPalosVerdes 17MUSTARanchoPalosVerdes CA 190'JJAY8tRanthoPalosVerdes CA 2120 ROte Rancho Palo!; Vet"des CA 29SOOOC£ flmchoPalosVerdes CA :12325SEA llandloP;ilosVerdes 310C8 HA\/ R.ucho P•IM Verdes 3482 NEW Rancho Palo$ Verdes 1"60All01flmchoPalosVerdes CA 3 Via Del C Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2029 TRU[ Rancho Palos Verdes CA 21S6 Wet Rancho Palos Verde!. CA 310UI MAJ Rilncho Palo$ Verde CA 27936ALV 11.M>ChQPalasVerdes CA 28951PalcRanchoPalosVerdes CA 1146 VM Rancho Palos Verdes CA lSOlWestRanchoPalosVerdes CA 2a652ROIRanchoPalosVerdes CA 2255SPAllRanchoP;ilosVenies CA 2435ColtlRand!oPaloiVMdes 2418 COLT Randto Palos Vefdes 27961 PAL Rancho Palos Verdes 5657 MIST Rancho Palos Verda CA 54S4EAU•RanthoP.tosVerdes CA 2&414SEA PalmVerdll'SP«nlru.ula CA 6830CRESR.:tnchoPalosVerdes CA 6620 LOOC Ril!Kho P.alos Verdes CA 27111 HA\/ Rancho Palos Verdes CA 28058 BRA lllln(ho Palos Vllll"des CA &624 E00\1 Palmo Verdes Pen1J15ula CA 6831\ll:RC.Rlll\dioPalosVerdes CA 5814SCOT Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2700VIA\/PalmVerdesEstates CA 6415 SEA.II Rancho Palo~ Ve1des CA 281141 BlY Rancho Palos Verdes CA 30039VIA RanchoPai.»Ver~ CA SMElAln R.JnchoPillm.Verdes CA 1915 HOM Rantho P;ilos Verdes CA 8 CHEIUln Hantho Pill0$ Verdes. CA 28805 CO\ Rantho Palos Verde!. CA 28318 P()t. Rancho P.fl<l5 Verde$ CA 25 O\£ST\.\ Rancho P11los V~ CA 64705EAtllllnchoPiJlo$Vlllldes 32200VAL Rant.ho Pak>$ Verda 4362EXULRanc,h.,PalosVerdft G1SOVERC Rancho Palm Verde.!i &462PARt1.RanchoPalosVerdes 2B033tOf.RilnchoP01!osVerda 6823fAIR(Ram;hoPalos\lerdes CA 29362WH RanchoPalosV~des CA m20 PINI Rancho Palm Vecdes CA 27131 WO Rolncho Palos Ver~ CA 3133 MA.ff Rancho Palos Verde$ CA 28830 CRE Rancho Palos Wr~ CA 295200CERaru:hoPalosVerde!. CA 6528 MAO Rancho Pakr.. Verde!. CA 7088 CRES Rancho P;ilos Verdes CA 29lllGOlRanchoPaloi.Verdll'S CA 30l3ftVIA Rane.ho Palm.Verdes CA 7016 HEIX Rancho Palos Vt1rde1. CA 16 HARBO: Romng Hdb. Estates CA 30420\llA Rand10 Palos Verdes CA Undl$d0$t!RanchoP.iilo$Vllll"des G753VERCRanchoPalmVerdft 90275 1699000 90275 779900 90215 3500000 90275 1649000 90275 11590CO 90275 90275 1399000 90275 1615000 90275 1149000 90275 1175000 90275 1225000 90275 90275 1350000 90275 90275 1065000 90275 90275 949000 90275 90275 875000 90275 9290X> 90275 1895000 9027S 645000 90275 699000 90275 859000 90275 1100000 90275 959000 90275 1135000 """ ....... 9027S 90275 551000 90275 639000 9027S i998000 90275 759000 90275 S027S mrxxJ 90275 """"' 90275 849900 90215 879000 90275 90275 889000 90275 1199000 90275 1225000 50275 720000 90275 1099000 '30275 1989000 90275 90275 750000 90275 1095000 90275 899CXXl 90275 1250000 90275 1125000 90274 2500000 90275 1575000 '""' 90275 2799000 9027<1 1089000 90275 569500 90215 400000 90275 1485000 90275 90275 1198000 90275 .U99000 90275 919000 90275 1350000 9CJ1.7S 7-49900 '"275 """" •0215 mooo 90275 U19000 90275 U49000 90275 849000 90275 960000 90275 925000 90275 109500CI 90275 1089000 90215 1149000 90275 1679000 90275 1199000 90275 90275 885000 90274 1699000 90215 1125000 90275 619000 go275 1075000 45 2 '·' 3 25 ~· 2.S 2.75 3 L75 4 2.S s 3 25 L75 3 vs SS 1.75 ' 2.25 L7S 2.s 2.S 4 3.25 L7S vs 3.75 2 3.25 25 S.25 2.S 3 4.7S 3 rn 2 2.75 ' 1.75 2.75 3 25 25 2 2.25 2.25 3.25 2.75 S.75 25 2.S 2 2.25 1801 5551 3'50 2720 "" 2891 3683 251!4 2375 1919 mo 3069 4244 ""' 2266 2864 "" 1548 2726 2052 "'° "" 4959 4932 1467 12>8 -1434 8211 2101 1624 "" .... 2536 2419 3'41 2880 1460 2135 4356 ""' 2317 2143 -2788 2545 .... "'"' 2056 "'" 1011 1569 "" 1746 3318 5810 24'5 "'" 1672 2595 """ 2875 2468 1822 27<"' "'' ""' "" 2420 3667 212& 4200 "'' 3805 1700 """ 1'7'8 16026 20013 1005i 15780 15623 23124 l,2424 ,,., 8122 24925 2<l084 ""' 7001 8942 "'" 12354 5817 "''' 11024 7114 6773 21706 132'0 197611 42681 10225 10118 1627• 21407 9S16 7816 77'2 1121 9319 1'554 9S76 9311 8712 10001 14556 9903 """ 3')10< 1A2 .. 1201'1 '""' .. ,. 7412 um 9231 .... "'"' "'" 215<4 '104 ,.., 1'021 9512 11341 7576 21661 "'"' 1062S 1913 "" 2002 "" 1968 1'61 1979 "" .. ,, 1936 1'63 1960 '"' 1961 ..,, 1956 "" '"' 1'SO l'.l'i7 "" 1'63 1972 1'70 1"9 2006 ""' 1955 "'°' ..., "'' 1'67 1'74 ''" "" 1.%2 "" "" 1958 1971 1"5 .... .,.. 1'64 "'n 1964 1987 l!HO 1963 2012 1919 1'SO 1951 1967 .... 1989 1960 1912 ""' ... , .... "" ""' "'" 1960 1970 1 ... 1963 1 ... 1%3 .... 1'70 1960 3 G.iirage 2 Garage 3 Garage l Garage 3 Garage 2 Gar.ageo 3 Garageo 2 Garage J Garage 2 Gar;ige 2 Gaci!ie 2 Gill'il&ll 2 Gilrage 2 Garace 2 Garage 3 GaJ"'" 1 26.olrage l Garil&e 2 Garqe l GVllCf S Garage 3G.a:rage 2 G<llap 2 Garageo 3 Garagl' 2 "'"" 2Gai-'1gt' 2<W ... 2 Garqe" 2 Garate 2 Gar.;igp S G,,,-age 3 Garat:l' 2 Garage 2 Gar.ace 3 Garage l G..-age 4 Ga...ace 2G~e 2 Garage 2 Garae:e 2 Garage 3 GM-age 3 Garote 2 Golrage 2 G..-;qie 2 Garage 1 0 3GM41£f' 3 Gar.,ge 3 Garage 3Gatagf' 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 G.:rr.1g11 3Gar~• 2 Gara&• 3 Garag 4 Gar;age 4 Garage 2 Garagt 2 Gat.aa;e 2 G:itilge 2 Gilfat:e 2Gar.age 3 Garage 2 Garag-. 3 Garage 2 Garag11 3 Garage 3Gar• 2 Garage 2 Gar;ogp ~/3/2012 5 5/10/2012 s 5,'10/2012 s S/10/2012 $ ~'30/2012 s 611/W12 S 5,'26/2012 $ 6/2B/20U $ 8/3/2012 s 8/3/20U S 4/25/2013 s 4/23/2013 5 4/26/2013 s 4/23/2013 5 8/29/2012 $ 1112/2012 s 4,'15/2013 5 l,'18/2013 s 2.'28/2013 s 3/6/2013 s 116/2013 s 3/14/2013 s 3/12/2013 s 2/1/2013 s 9/20/WU S 2/25/WU S 3/14/2013 s 8/~2012 s 10/lr./2012 s 8/2B/20U S 8,'1.7/2012 5 8/31/2012 5 9/S/2012 s 4/23/1D13 s 1/31/2013 s 1/U{2013 S 1/1/2013 s l/1{2013 s 114/2013 s 2/21/2013 5 2/21/2QU 5 1'25/2013 s 1'25/2013 s l'2S/2013 s tl?'i/2013 s 1/25/2013 s 1130/2013 s 2/6/2013 s l/6/20U 5 2/6/2013 s 2.119/2013 $ 2/20/2013 s 2/20/2013 $ 4110/2013 s 4/26/2013 s 4/26/'2IJ13 s 4/29/2013 $ 4/29/2013 $ ~l30/2013 5 71'2!./20U $ 7116/lO:U S S/6/2012 s S/S/20U $ 7111/2012 s 1118/2012 $ 6120/2012 s 7/25/2012 s 7120/2012 s 7121/"LOU $ 1n1/20t2$ 6/1/2012 s 10/30/2012 s 10/31/2012 s 11/t.4/2012 s 11120/2012 s 11120/2012 $ 1216/2012 $ 12/3/2012 s 12/11f:Wl2 $ 12118/2012 s 12118/2012 $ 12113/2012 s 12/18/2012 s 1,623,000 httJJ;//www.r· C;ibfo1ma Real Estate Vl.2014941 Pl!llimul.l SOtheb¥'S lnt'I Rlty 782,000 hup://www.r· Cahfornia Real hlilte Sl20311ll EVl!retl Real btale Group 3.350.000 hnp:/J~.r. CaHforn101 Re.i btate VU003661 Ptni~ula SOtheby'$ lnt'I Riiy 1,590,000 hnp://www.r• Cahfom1a Real Estate Vl.2035537 RE/MAX Estate Propertie 1.125.000 http://www.r. California Real £state Vl2009896 K:eller WIRiam$ Palos Vetdes 1,150.000 http://WWN.redfin.conVCA/Rancho-P•los·\lerdes/30322-Rhont•Or·90275/hofl'le/7744CfiJ6 1.316,250 trttp://www.r> California Real Estate 1/12019845 Prudent iii CllffornMI Realty t.639,000 http://www.r· California Real Enat1 V1~ Coldwell Sanker P.V./SDUth Bay 1,000.000 http://www.r> California Real Estate Vl2050923 RE/MAX Est~e Propertlti 1.110,000 http://www.r> Olifomla Re.:il Es111te V12047554 PenlnsulaSotheby'" lnt1 Rlty 1,225,000 http://www.n California Real Esute l>V1303S~72 RE/MAX Estat1 Properties. 690,000 http://www.r.dfin.com/CA/Rancho-Palos-Verde./27621·'ta1r~Df-90275/home/1731196 1.lS0,000 http://www.r> CalifomiaReal Est;ate PV13010302 Prudential Califom1il Realty l.SS0.000 http://www.rtldfm.com/CA/Rancho-Palo$-Verdes/2-N11vol1J-Ct·90275/home/774l070 1.,065.000 http./lwww.t> Cahfomla Real Estate U-576427 Mlll$ Realty of c.allfornla 1,300,000 http;/Jwww.redfln.wm/CNRch·Pai()j,..\lrd/30730-Vla-La-Cresta-90275/hotne/7750300 949,000 http://WWW.r• C.llfom1a Re.ii Utate PV130345S8 RE/MAX Estale Properties 765,000 http://www.redfln.com/CA/ll11ndio·P~·Verdes/6415-\lla-Canada-90215/homfl/n33184 849.000 htlp://www.r. Callf~Rtal Estilte 511093900 leacrest Re~ 910.000 t¢tpJ/w-.,. OllSNet MlS Fl2097US Century 21 All MO\les 1.800,000 http://www.r> California Re.iii butte Vl2101483 RE/MAX Euate Propertiti 645,000 http://www.r-Callforn1• Real htllle SB1301805ft RE/MAX Est.ale Propertie. 680.000 http://www.roCallfomtaRealEstai:eSB13019485 KelleiWilllam$Realty 840,fXXJ hnp:/jwww.r> Californt. Re.el htillt PVl21S2219 Prudential Callfoml• Really l.100,000 hllp://www.r> C:.l!lom1'1 Real htate V12044049 Rf/MAX El!Ute Ptopert!M <JS9,000 http://www.n CallforfQ Real Estatt1 PV12139523 Kf!HerW~li.srrn. Palos Verdes 1.0fi0,000 http://-.r> Caltfomi. Rul Estate S705216 Zlpf\eally Inc 1.929.fXXJ Mtp://www.r> C;illforni• Roi Es1ate Vl20'3508l Pnx!enl~ California Really 3.850,000 httpJ/www.~in.com/CA/Rar.c.ho-Palo5.·Verdff/3-Via-Del·Oelo-90275/home/1228L."'07 S!il,000 http://www.r. Califom1;1 Real U.tate \ll2060299 Prudent1.iil CA!lfomlaReally 622,000 hrtp:/fwww.r Uil!fom1a Real Estate Vl20!3499 Rf/MAX Estilte Properties ~.815.000 hnp://www.r> QiUfcm1a Rul Estate Vl2060693 Pen1muli1 Sotheby'$ lflt'1 Rlty 729,000 http://www.r> Oilllforn!aRt>al £s1ate Sl2088538 lr.ell11r Wiiiiams Rt1alty 3.815,000 http://www.rodfln.ctJm/Uo./R•ncho-Palos-Verdes/2A9Sl·Palos·Verdts-Dr·E·90275/00me/7138946 745,000 hUp://www.r• calffomia.RHI Es late Vl2106054 Coldwell Banker-PV/Bch. Cttltls 535.000 http://~.r. Callfomit1 Real Est,.r1 SB12131303 Home Tum Realty 841.000 http://www.r> California RHI Estllte SBU129046 Atlantic & P;ttifk Real Estate 860.000 http://wvN<l.f• California Real Estate V12085361 RE/MAX Estate Propartil!s 975,455 http://,,,,_.redfin.com/C4/R-.:ho-Palos·Vetdes/2435-Colt-R.d-90275/hcme/7732379 885,000 http://www.r ca1ifG111ia Reel Est"/lt.111 510095443 Keller Wdl..ms Realty t,040,000 hup:/Jwww.r> callfomla RH! Estate 51211.8856 Re/Ma Exei:s South Bay 1.130.000 hllp://www.r> c.llfomia Rul Estate Vl2103125 PV 8roker..,e Inc 690,000 htlp:/jwww.r> cahlornla Real btilte Sl2109793 Keller Williams Realty 1"180,000 http://www.r· c.llfomif.Real £Jt1tto SBUl-46751 RE/MAX Estate Properties UJS.000 http://-.r> Ullf~R~ Estate PV12142241 Keffer WllliamsPtlos Vetdes 1,500,000 http://.,,._.,. california Real Esute PV121S467.4 ltEjMAX £slille Properties 150,000 htt.p://www.r>CaHtorniaRea1EstateS698817 eSlmplfl Reilltylm; l,060.000 http://..-,. califom.a Real Estate V12072615 Pt1ninsula Properties 899,000 hl1p://~.,. California Re;il Enat• PVU1531U Se\len Seas lnVl!Slment, Inc. 1.150,000 htlp://w-.r>C.liforn1'1Re;ilEstateSBl2139371 lteii:RultyCompany 1.090,000 http://www.r• c.ufoml:i R1tal Esu11e PV12133100. RE/MAX E!UU! Properties 2,260,000 http://www.ri California Relit Estate Vl2113094 RE/MAX btM;t Propertltts 1.525.000 http-.//www.r> Callhirnia Real ER ate Vl2122130 RE/MAX Estate Ptopertle:!. l,OS0,000 http://-.r-. C.lifom1a Real Estate 5813035990 Keller Wllllillll5 Beach Otlf!5 2..100.000 http;//www.t-California Real £st.lte Sll044a32 Shorewwd Re<tltor.o INC 1,125.000 http://WWN.r> California Rnl E:m1te l>Vl304506S Penlmllla Sotheby'$ lnt1 Rlty 560,000 http-J/www.ti ~ifonna Rt111i Estate 5813005365 The Rnl EMate G1oup 225,000 htt.p://WWW.r> Clliforrna Rn! E5111te PV1213SS09 Ke!lt1 Wiiiiams/iA Harbor l.SG2,88& htlp://WNW.r.C;illfornla Real E$late 12172976 Real Est.i.e Moftiilp ~· 669,000 htt.p://-.ri California Real Utate 512010001 C·ll Union Realty l.,2!i0,000 ht.tp://'WWW.t• California ReaJ Estate VU153822 RE/MAX btateo Properties 3,000,000 http://www.r Callforruil Real Estate Slll43842 Shofll!wood Realtor.; 920,000 http://www.r> C.Ufoml&Reat Estille VU01"3S& Coldwell Banltei P.V./Sculh Say 1.300,000 http://..-.r. Califombf\eal Estate 511106.512 KeHt1 WllliMm Reilhy 110,000 http://www.n OllSNet Mts fl2077124 Prime Banker Realty Inc. 995,000 hnp://.,._.r> C•lfformalleal U.liltt V120SZ416 Prudt!ntilll CalifOflll<l RHlty 910,000 hup://-.11 California Real Estaie S.12051216 Shor-ood ReilhoB INC 1,lft9.3SO http://~.r>CalifomiaReillEstille\112023112 KellerWIDia!t4P.:iios\lerdes 1.200,000 htlp://www.1> Califo1nla Real Estate P821972 Real Est.ieXperts Inc. 850,000 http://WNW.f> CA11fomMI Rnl Estate SXl2:iB8 Verandol Homes 925,000 http://www.r• tallfornia Real Estate VU0465fi1 Coldwell B;inke1 P.V./South Bay 900.000 http://www.r> Callfom>a II.HI Estate S12091112 keffe1 WIHlams Beach Cities 1.095,000 hllp://www.r> Callfornl11 Real Estate Vl21ll103 Rf.IMAX Estate Pmpertlei 1.uo.000 http://www.r. Callfomla Re.I Estate Vl21195S6 Cnldwell Banker P.V./South Say 1.155,000 httrrJ/-.r> Cakfom>. Rul Estate Vl2121991 Peninsula Sothtby's lnt'I Rlty 1.649,000 hltp://www.r> California RHI Est;ite PVU1283:13 Coldwell Banktr-PV/Bth. Citii1$ 1.lS0.000 http://www.r• California Re;il Est•te V12U5280 Rl/MAX £stat• Properties 2.100,000 http://,,,,_.,., Caltfcmla Aeal Est;ite Vl2079368 RE/MAX Estate Propen~ tlJ0,000 http://www r• California Real Enaie Vl21212Sl AE/MAX Estate Pn:ipertiu 1,650,000 hllp:l/www.r• Cahfofl)ia Real hlalf Vl204566S RE/MAX btate ?ropertit:!o 1..070,000 ht:f:p!/lwww.r> C:.ld"omia Real Estate S12083438 Keller WiUiams Reahv 679.000 hnp:l/www.r> C.lilomi::o Rul Esl~e Vl20911S3 The Rea1£su1e Group 990,000 hnp://W-.r> California Real Estill~ Vllll0242 Coldwell Banker-P\l/Bch. Clti1!5 C - 2 7 Pasl Sale Single Family Rl!~id•mU;il 28511 HA2 Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90215 119SOOO 4 2.25 2485 12280 1963 3 Gaia11.e 12/ 10/2012 5 1,275,000 http://www.r> Ca!!fornia Real E5tale PV12.139417 RL/MAX Elllale Propertlti P<»tSale Singlefam1lyResidential 27HORSE!RollingHills&tates. CA 90274 J649000 4 3..25 4036 14731 1919 4 Garage 12,'l4/20lJ S l.640,000 hup://-.r·CallfornlaRealEstateV12U1984 ColltwtllSani:erP.V./SoLilhflay PastS.ale Srnglef&milyRoldenttlM 2TOPRAll 1WnchoP.alosV11rde. CA 90275 899000 3 2 2261 244801 l.S60 2 G;m1ge 12/26/1012 S 1.265,000 hltp://w-.r·Oliforru11Rulblai.•SU100379 Kt'l!erWl111¥1m8HthCrt1M Past Slilt Srn,:le Famdy ResKknhal 1933 VALL R11ndlo P11los Verde CA 90215 689CXO 4 2 1798 8577 19$9 2 Gar11u 12/29/2011 S 700,000 hnp:/fwww.r• O!lforrna Real Est;Ht PV1214204S Keller Williams/LA Harbtir Past.5* stnalefoimilyResidential 1909WestRanchoP.alosVerde!i CA 90275 719000 5 3 2522 7338 1962 2 Garage 12/31/2012 S 703,000 hltp:f/www.r·OflfornlaReilEslateSUU425a RealEstateWest Past Sale SinglefarmlyResldenllal 28315CO'.RanchoPalosVerde. CA 90275 899900 4 2.S 22U 6&42 19n 2 Garage 12/ll/2012 $ 950,000 httrr.//w-.r>CallfomlaRellEstateSB1214W24 Re/MuExit<:Sll~ondoBeach Past Sale Single Family Residenllal 28704 CO\ Rancho Palos-Verde. CA 90275 998000 4 3 2639 9548 196G 2 Garage 12/28/2012 $ 998,000 http:/Jwww.r• tallfoml1 Rut En ate PV12U!J410 PenlMul;;i Sotheby's lnt'l Rhy Past Sale Single Family Rtslden1ial 42 OCf.AN. Rancho Poil01 Verde CA !Kl27S 16SOI)'.)') 6 3.25 3670 19338 1963 3 G_,age l t/29/20U $ 1,610,000 http://www.r> California Rul Estate PV1213lll4 Penlnsulil Sotheby's ln11 Rlty Past Sale Slnale family Residential 3 Moontnl: Rancho Palos Verde!. CA 90215 4 3 2477 1962 11/20/2012 S 1,350,000 httrrJ/www.redfln.com/CA/ll&n(:ho-PalOl-Venles/3-Moonmlst·Dr·90275/home/7144364 Pa$t~le SinglefamilyResi!H!n1ial 6110SCOTRanthaP.-.losVerde Q. 90275 995000 4 3 2374 9022 1%4 2 Garage 11/13/2012 S 1.008,000 http://www.r·CalifOfniaRu!E~tateV1212.2252 Penln$1Ha.sotheby'slnt'IRlty P'"1s .. 1e SinglefamilyResidenlQI 29000flR1RanchoPOllosVerdes CA 90275 1035000 4 2.75 2166 U61 1967 3 GMaee 11/27/1012 S UU0,000 http://www.,.DillfornuRu1EstateV12116249 RE/MAXEsl;atePro~n1e1o Pal Sale Srngle Fam~y Resldetrt1al 91 MAii.Gt R11ncho Pala:s Verdes CA 90275 5999000 4 6 7800 57046 1991 4 Garage 5/31/2012 S S.500,000 htlp://www.ri Cahfom~ Rul Est;ate Sl2029l89 Shof'!Wood Reillton INC Pasts.ale Singlefam1lyResidMI~ 41SANTA Rancho Palos Verde:!; CA 90275 2199000 5 4 3841 18614 1985 3 Glllaf:• 6/4/2012 S l,000,000 hnrr.//www.toCallform.alleal£st;ateV12013456 RE/MAXEstai•PtopertleJ. Past.S.le SlnglehmllyResidenl.al 7115CRE5RanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 1299Cl00 4 3 2760 11984 1965 3 Garnge S/l8/20U S 1,220,000 h1tp;f/www.,.californiaRe1lbt.ateV12015977 ColdwalllmikerP.V./SouthBily Past Sile Single F.amily R11Sldentlill 7301 VIA A !Wncho Palas Verdes a. 90175 999999' 3 3 2211 10287 1962 2 Gar11ge ll/l/2012 S l,020,000 httrr.l/www.r> c.lifornla Real Estate Vl2120432 Ccldw•ll Banker·PV/lkh. Cities Past Sale SlnglefamilvResldenUal 30327GAfJU.nthoPilosVerd..,. CA 90275 71.00GO 3 2.25 1874 11587 1964 2 Garage 12.'lU20t2 S 700,00J http://www.r·CalifornlaRealEsimteS812l49Sl.a Excelfundl11&R.E.S~tnc P.a:stSale Slng!ef.amllyReskhmtlal 66038EACIWnchoPalasVerde~ CA 90275 990000 3 2.15 2116 4453 1990 2 Garage 9/ll/20U S 970,000 Mtp://www.r>Callfoml.aRe.afEst.ateVU05596! RE./MAXE5tatePropenlt!!. PanSale SinglefamllyResldentllll 4SJ6Eart!fl;inchoP1l~Vfl'des CA 90215 lOSOOOO 2 2 1980 27721 1962 2 Gar.igt' 6/5/2012 S l,050,000 http://www.r>C..lifoml&RulEstateSl.2020266 R../MaxExttsRPV P;ut Sale Single Famlly Resid1ntial 2049 5UAI> !Wncho Palos V&rdes CA 90275 770000 3 1.75 1584 10159 1959 2 Garage 9/l1/2Dl2 S 770,000 http;/~.r> a.lifomi. Reill Est•e V120017SO RE/MAX E.nlle Prtipenift PastSille 5mgl.efamtlyResM!entlll lOCRESl\\RanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 1495000 4 35 3513 213S3 1960 3 G11rage 6/l/2012 S 1,547,000 http;//www.r>Dilifoml&R~EstMeV170l9268 R[/MAXblilleProperties Past Sale Sinete f.amily Roni!U:nti.al 16 ST!RRUL Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90215 737200 3 1.75 1955 2 Garagt 9.'23/2012 S 650,000 http:.//www.r> cattfomla Real bt.te Sl206992S Rr/MM Exeu RPV Past Sale 5mgle family R"'6elllial 6711 KING Rancho Palos Verdes CA . 90l75 1189000 5 3.25 2758 7430 1971 2 GM.age 9/13/2012 5 1.105.000 http://www.r> c .. tlfornit Re.al Estate 512007922 cal Pro R1alty, Inc. Past.S.le SinglefamilyRe5tdentlal 7026CLO\fRanchoPak$Verde. CA 90275 969000 4 3 2478 7536 1%3 2 Garage 9.'18f2012 S 950,000 http://www.r·c.llfomi•Rea1EstateV1209!M6B KeUetWIHi8msP8'mVtrde1. Past S.ale Single F.mily Reskltnlral 10 VIA DEL ~ncho Palos Verdes CA 9027$ 2999000 5 4.S 6994 28357 1999 4 Garage 9/2S/Xll2 $ 2,900,000 hllp://WWw.r> C;ittfornla Re.I Esute 511114056 Shl»'twood Realto~ INC Past S.le Single F.amlly Residenll.al 20 ONOiR Rolling Hdb CA 90274 ~SOOO 3 2.5 336.l 711520 1973 3 Garill!• 9'20/2012 $ 2,850,000 http://www.r• Caltfornl• Rul Estate Vl.2076474 Prudential Callfoml.a Realty Past Sale 5inglefamilyResldent1al 5276SlLVERaochoPalosVl:f'~ CA 9027S 829000 4 2 2209 1S794 1961 2 Gar'"l!e S/19/2012 $ 81S,OOO http:/Jwww.nCaUf11mi•Rea1£stlJleV12010204 R£/MAXEstatePmpertie P.stSale Sin,:lefamllyR~li8' 27912LONIWlthoPala:sVenl~ CA 9027S 1249000 5 2.5 2440 U031 1966 3 G~ 6/15/2012 5 1.225,000 htlp://www.r.CallfomlaRu.1EstateV120U674 Coldw.ila.tnkerP.VJSou1hBay Past Salt" Sin&le Family Resid.iotrtlal 4630 811.0\ Rancho Palos Verde!. CA 90275 910000 6 3 2111 12txXl 196G 3 Garage 10/10/20U S 860,000 http://www.r> C,llfornia Re.al Es1ate Vl1141S68 Rockyfleld Past Sale Sing!.! Family ResidenUal 4672 &RO\ !Wncho P11los Verdft CA 90275 819700 4 2 2142 12850 1%6 2 Garage Ul/18/2012 S 820.000 http://www.ri Calllomia Real Esiate \'12070633 RE/MAX £stale Properties P'"t5alt Singleh1TUlyResiohnt1af 49120ELARanchoP.alosVerdes CA 90275 86SSOO 3 1.75 1800 7223 1966 2 Garage 1\)118/2012 5 839,000 http//wwwnCallform.aRHlEstat.e512074S61 EmarWllll.amJohnJon PastSale SinglefamilyRe$id111t1al 4805fAlC·RlindioPliknVerdft CA 90275 889500 4 L75 1834 11153 1965 2 Gar11gt lQ/25/2012 S 889,000 hup:/lwww.rCallforru•Rt.a1Esu11.eV12111942 PruchmtiafQllfomiaReal1¥ Past Sale Single f;imily Residential 2?631 WAJ R11ndio Palos Verdes CA 90275 93SOOO 4 2 1701 804A 1959 2 Gar;1&e 1'24/2013 $ 925,000 hltp:/Jwww.r> C,lifotnl• R1HI Estate SBl2150504 Re/M.ax Exea Redondo BelitCh Pa1tSale SlnglefamilyRnidenUat 4807BRO\Ro1HnglillbEst;ttes. CA 90275 879000 4 3 2364 24916 1966 2 Garage '>/9/2012 S 851,000 hltp://www.r>CallfornlaRea!EstateV12039!79 Penlnlula5otlu1by'slnl'IRll¥ Past Sale Sln&lefamilyResldcntllM 48498RO\RandloPalo3.Verde:!. 0\ 90275 889IXlO 4 3 2189 14440 1965 3 Garage 7131/1012 S 82S,OOO http://www.riallfornlal\ea/Est.ate11·549461 RE/MAXMq;;iGroup Past Sale SlnglefmiilyResidenttal 5008GOLtRanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 899000 3 2.5 1896 13475 1961 2 Gar;;t&e Y3/2012 S 865,000 hltp://~.r.CafffornlaRe.albtal:e512D63962 Corr..moneRt,lty Past Sale Slnglef.milyflaldenlla/ 275251.AR Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90l1!i 104S000 5 2.5 2386 %6l 1965 2 Garagf' S/6/20U $ 1,035,000 http:l/www.r-Ollfoml.aRf!llEst'.'te5120S4564 KellerWIUli1R1$Re.alt~ Past Sale SingleFamilyRnldenti.al 5222SILV£R..tl'KhoPalo:sVerdes CA 90275 799000 3 1.75 1680 723& 1959 2 Gange 12113/20l2 $ 790,000 http://www.r>c.ltfomlaRealest.atePVUU7'19 RE/MAXEstateProperl~ Pas1Sale Siriglef11mlyResident~ 279908.EER11ndloPaklsVerdft CA 90275 949900 4 2.5 2447 -4136 1967 2 Gara,e 11116/2012 5 900,000 http://www.r·californi<IRe.alEstllleS12094417 GokHinWejtftotalt¥ Past~le SlnglefarmlyResidl!nUal 2'1614WAIRanclioPalosVerdes CA 90275 779000 4 1.75 1834 1349 1959 2 Garage 11130/Wl2 S 880,000 http://www.r>Calilomialle.alEsuleV12.U566B COldwe!IBanketP.VJSoulhB.:ty Pottt S.ale Single family Res1d1111Uitl 274.H LAA Rarn:ho Pak>$ Verdft CA ~7!i 92SOOO 5 3 2225 U764 1!165 2 Garatr;e U/23/2012 $ 710.000 h!tp-.//www.r. Califorrn. Real Es!Me 512086317 Home Te.am Realty Past Sale single Faml!v Residential 21017 51L\I Rlirn;ho Palos Verdes CA 90275 1150000 4 3 2794 l.293S 1967 2 Garage 8/29/2012 S 1,150.000 http://""'--" c..!lfornla Real Eslal.t Sl.20l8944 Coldwell &inker fte5klential Pasts..le Townhouse 17~0lOSRanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 319000 2 1.5 930 6%66 1914 2 Garage 11119/2012 S 319,000 http://www.ro~omiaRNIEst.at•Sl2ll2464 KcllerWilllamsRe.alty Pe$tSale Townhouse 28Sl5b£AlbnchoPa!osVerde:5 CA 90275 329000 3 1.5 U74 1975 2 Glll'qe 0/5/2012 $ 329,000 http://www.r>c.aforniaRealEstateVl1144111 R[JMAXEst.atePtopertie. Past Sale Townhouse 27904 Nor Rancho Palas Verdes CA 90275 469000 2 1.S 1152 1973 2 Gar.agt 5/2/2012 S 45':>,000 http://wwwJ> c.Kfoml.a 1141.al Estate VU031037 RE/MAX Estate Properties Past Sale Tow~• 88 Hill TOI Rancho P.iilm Verdes CA '30275 174000 2 3 .2112 46:91 1979 2 ~ 5/24/2012 S 750.000 http;/fw-.r> callfornla Real Est.ate Sll152S39 RHI Estatt Oullet, 111(. Past sale Townhouse 6406RJDGRanchoPala:sVer'™-CA 90275 699000 3 2.5 2219 1971 2 Garage 7/20/2012 S 661l,OOO http://-.r>CaUfomlaRe.alEstM:eS120&3988 HomeleamRealt.y P.ttt sale Townhouse 2794D R~ Rancho Poilas Verdes CA 90275 425000 2 15 U40 1973 2 Garagt 10/lS/2012 S 420,000 http;!/-·" San Diego Courlty's R 120025644 Whtileule Ok'ed Ru! Estale P;151Sale Townhol4t 6400SEAllRallchoPaloo.Verde$ CA 90275 765000 3 2.5 2712 1938 2 Gal'~ge 6115/2012 $ 755.000 http:f/www.r>Qoliforrn•RealE5tatrV1203566l KellerWdl111111$Palosll'ertlft Past Sllle Townhol4t 5 ll'IA SAN Jbncho Palos Verdes CA 90275 869000 4 3 2309 5314 1589 2 Garac• 11/24/2013 S 869,000 hllrr.l/www.r• ~llform.. Rul Esute IN13034009 Rul Estill• Brokerlt(e Group Pasts.le Townhouse 28028NorRanchoPa!osVerdes CA 90275 493000 2 1.5 1152 34!5 1973 2 Garate 4/17/2013 $ 479,000 http:l/www.rCallfomiaR1a\Es1.at11PV13015461 PRninst1laSotheby'slnt'IRh¥ Past Sale Townhouse 28000 RIDt Rancho Palos Verda CA 90275 559000 2 2 1465 520034 l~m, 2 Gara,e 1/3/2013 S S72.SOO http://...,_.r> C.llfomi.a Reill Esllde P\112136594 eoldwell Banlw·Pv/Bch. Cltle$ PastSale Townhotu.e 2800SRIDIRanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 49SOOO 2 1.5 1140 272623 1974 2 Garage 4/10/2013 S 475,000 httir./tw-.r·C.llfornt•RelJIEitateS8130101M PrudenUalc.altfornlaRealty Past.Sale Townhouse 27VlAWflanchoPa!osVerdei Cllo 90275 390000 1 1 1313 ,'!64946 1989 l Garill!e 9n8/2012 S 390,000 http;/f-.r>Dillfom1aRt.alEstateS1207S8&9 Sl<.yllneRealtyGrot.lp PmtSale Townhouse-23VlASA~R.iinchoPalosVeules a. 90275 849000 4 2.7S 2309 5314 1989 2 Was• 11/14/2{112 5 820,000 http://WNW.r•C.llfornl.aRnlESlate512097175 PalmRultySoutlqu. Pas!Sale Townhouse 28153Sou Ran<hoP~Verde CA '90275 419900 2 15 ll.52 419781 1974 2 Garage 8/21/2011 S 4n,soo http://www.,.Dillfornl11R.ulEs111eV12066490 RE/MAXEst;iteProperlies Pas1S.ale Town~ 23HILLTOIR.anchoP111oiVetdes CA 90215 722500 2 25 1913 1219 197.9 2 Gar• 8/31/2012 $ 717,000 hltp;J/w-.r>QblornlaRe.alEst11teV1203a306 ColdwellBsnktrF>.VJSouth&ey Past5ale Townhous,e 28305R10iR:lnd!oP11losVer~ CA 90275 696000 3 3 2219 753676 1S17 2 Garac• 8/30/1012 $ 671,000 http://-.1>callforna,RulEst11eVl2(1'"87 ft[/MAXEstateProparties P.astSale Townhot4e 20NorthSRollingHdbbtilles CA 90274 6250CO 2 2.25 1794 6$81 1973 2 G~e 9no/20U S 610,000 ht:!p://.._.,.Qtiforn1aRealEs1at1SUOS8259 PtudentlllCallforn~Realty Past~le Townhouse 2937SIND RandioPalasVerdti CA 90275 94.9888 3 3 2943 13334 1939 2 Garage 10/lS/2012 S 890,000 http://www.r>C.ltfomiaRu1EttilleVl2093336 Coktwelle.nketP.VJSoulhB.ly P.astSale Townhouse 30ASPEN'RolffnaHilbEstates CA 90274 1980tXl 3 2.75 2184 1939 1975 2 GlilagP llf3/WB S 7'90,000 http:/fwww.r.calltomlaRea1EstiilteSB130010% RE/MAXEstat1"1opert111S P.ast~le Tow~e 1618STOf\SanPedro CA 90732 399000 2 2.25 1572 1976 2 Garage ll25/20H 5 337,000 http://www.,.CallfomiaRulEstatePV12151288 RE/MAX£$!atePropertles Pas!Sale Townhouse 1602STor.5anPedro CA 90132 399000 2 2.25 1307 167015 1976 2 Glilqe 4/16/2013 S 399,000 http://www.r>CalifornlaReatEstatePVl3030875 Pr\ldentilrlc.llforniaRul!y Past Salt TownhotiSe 17220l05R.iinchoPalos.Verdes CA 90275 260000 3 2 1200 191374 1974 2 Garage 3/1.i/2013 S 295.000 http;//www.r>C .. llfoml.aRHIEstate 12171431 P1asperttyHQmes&loam. Past Sale Townhow.e 29634151.>IWnchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 639000 3 2.5 1831 3868& 1935 2 Gar;ie:e 618/2012 5 620,000 http://www.r>Callfornl.aRealEstateV12043204 5even5e~llWll:5tment,lnc. Past Sale Townhouse 6402.SEAUR~Palm.Venles CA 90275 115000CI 2 3 2474 3915 1988 2 GMage 5116/2012 $ 1.060,000 hnp://-.r>calllorni.aRe.alE$t.ateVl2032536 Coldwelllbni:erP.YJSouthB.av P.aslSale Townhouse 6310RIPGRanchoPalos-Vllflks CA 90275 569000 2 2 1533 520034 1975 2 Gilfill!ll' 5/25/2012 5 S.S0,000 hUp://www.r>c..lit'OrrnafttalE.stateV11136570 R[JMAXOtat•Propertles PaslS.al• Townhous~ 6312RIDGRanchoPalos-Vetdti CA 9027S 649000 4 3 200S 520034 1975 :t: GM:;oCe 6/13/2012 5 652.000 hllp://www.r>cattforn<aRiralEsllll•Vl2047756 R£/MAXEsta1eProp1rties Past.S.le Townhouse 77HllLTOIRanchoPalosVerde CA 90275 799000 2 2 1859 2759 19n 2 Garag• 6/29/2012 S 799,000 http://www.1>Citltfomialleal&.tateV12066716 Coldw•llS.nkerP.V./SoulhBay Past Slllt Townhouse 28025 RID< Rantho P11los Verdes CA 90275 539000 3 3 1439 273261 1973 2 Garage 7/3/2012 5 S25,000 http://www.r> Clllfoml.a Real EstMe V12063522 RE/MAX Estiltl! Properties Past S.ale Townhouse 28131 RIOo Rancho P;las Verde$ CA 90275 540000 2 2 1494 520034 1916 2 Gati!ie 8/10/2012 5 S4S,000 hl!p://www.r. CallfOfnia Rul Est..ie Vl207tl083 RE/MAX Estate Pro~nlei Past S.alt Townhouse 6400 R1dg1 Rlll>dlo Palos Verd.,. CA 90275 3 3 2211 1977 <1/24/2013 S 715,000 hllp:/}Www.redfln.com/CA/Rand!.-..Palos.Vllt'dff/6400-llidgebyrn.e-0·90175/unit-104/home/7748979 P.as1Sale Townhouse 28115RIO<RanthoPitlosVerdes CA 90275 525900 3 3 1974 520034 ~76 2 Gar.age 7/30/2012 $ S11,000 http://www.•·CaliforniaRea/EstaeSUCBi-4S9 5horewoodRtAl.TORS PJRS.le Townhouse 28408RJDiRandloPalosVerdt:!. Cllo 90275 715000 3 2.lS 2067 153076 1977 2 Gat.iice 1/25/2013 5 690,000 http;//www.r-QllforntaRe.alEU.at•PV12142616 11.E/MAXEstatePtopertles Pa:stS.le Townh-29HIUTOIRanchoPalosVerde!. CA 90275 695000 2 2.25 1948 1979 2 G.arage 2(21/2013 5 700.000 http://www.riC.!rfomiaRulE5tatePV13002247 Prudentia/CallfornlaRe•lty Past S.ale Townhowoe 11 VIA W Rancho Palos Verdti CA 90275 649000 4 2.75 2309 198!1 2 Ga..-~e 1126/2012 S IBS,000 hllp:/fwww.r> Dilifom1a RINI Eslale V12044347 REJMAX Esme PropertteS Past Sale Townhouse 28164RIOIR.anchoPalosVerdes Cllo 90275 429000 2 2 1152 419181 1974 2 Garage 5/)1/2012 5 400,000 htr.p:/fw-.r>CRISNelMLS F12013444 RodeoRHlty Past ~le Townho1Ue 28.215 RIO. Rancho P~ Verde:. CA 90275 575000 3 2.5 1811 520034 1915 2 Ga..-age 12/21/2012 S S75.000 hnp:l/www.ro California Real Estat• PV12132402 RE/MAX Estate Properties Past5ale Townhouse 27909RIOoRanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 599900 3 25 U'8 300755 1973 2 Gar.ige 11121/2012 S 5n,soo ht.tp://wwwr>CallfornlaRe.alEstal:eVl2114008 RE/MAX[$taleProperties Pas! Sale Townhouse 28655 \/'i5t Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 3 3 1436 1975 11/19/2012 $ 428,000 http://www.redfin.com/CA/Rancho-P.llos·Venles/2865S.Vista-Madera-90275/home/7729864 Past Sale Townhouse 28SOJVISll\anchoPalasVetdes CA 90275 415000 3 3 1455 238519 1975 2 Garage 9t28/"20L2 $ 415,000 http://www.r>Callfomi .. Rea1EstateV1210062S Prutlenualca!lforntaReah¥ Past Sale Townhouse 290CEAN RanchoP.alosVerde5 CA 90275 825000 l 2.25 246!. 1931 2 Garag• 5130/1011 5 325,000 htlp://wwwr-CaUlornlaRNIEstateVU03568i Pnidential~!lfomiaReahy Past Sale Townhouse 26027RIOiR.anchoP11losVerdes 0. 90275 574000 3 2.5 1595 3497 1913 2 Gar-ase 5/l4[2fJU 5 570,000 hup:/Jwwwr·C•lifomtaRe.albtat~Vl2033074 Co!dweUBankerP.V./Soulh&y MEDIAN 2189 1966 S 890,500 C - 2 8 -~ """""" Past Sale Umdo/COop 27 PEARTREE ln Past»le Condo/Coop lSCypressWay P~ISale Condo/Coop 9010HPVAU£YDr#103 PaslSale Condo/Coop 27Hillues1Mmll31 Pll$15al• Condo/COop 901 OEEP VALLEY Or 1203 Pas I Salo Condo/COop 901 DEEP VALUY Or 11210 PastSale Condo/COQP 9010eepValleyDrSte213 Past Sale Condo/Coop 977 SILVER SPUR Rd Past Sal11 Condo/Coop 17 Avoc;,do Ln Past S.le Singll! family Resld•ntlal 5 SPINNING WHEEL Ln Past Sate Si1111le Family RM!denllal 9 Q.fAR VISTA Dr Pi!MSal11 SingleFamllyR~idenllal lOPEPPERTREEln Pas.t Sale Single Famify Residential 26448 OUNWOOO Rd Past S..111 Sing!.:! F411T11iy Rnidetllm 47 SILVER SPRING Dr P.nt Sile Sln&le famity Rnldential 5262 WILLOW WOOD Rd P~ Sale Single hmify Residenti:il 2 PONY Lil Pzt Sale 51n&:1e F.a1111ly Residenllal 5031 WILLOW WOOD Rd Past Salli Single Famlty R~enUal 4616 SUGARHIU Or P;15t Sale Single Family RJJSidetltial 2563 PALOS VERDES Dr Pasts.le Single hmlly Rei;identlal 36 HARBOR SIGHT Dr Past sale Single Fatnlly Aesidentlal 4 PLEASANT HI Past Sale Single Fifl'lilo/ Re$ldentlal ZS ROUINGWOOD 01 PastSele SlngleFamilyReos!deru.lal 20COUNTRYln Pa:st S..le Singh1 F~ly ReJJC.nUal SS ROWNGWOOO Or Past Salee Single Family Re:sl~lai 37 OAPPLEGRAV Ln PztSat. Slngi.F.iimllyReslthtntliil 28AURORA0t Past Sale Single Family kesidenlial 2255 PALOS VEii.DES or Pasl Sale Slogle Family Rmidenti.ll 49 COUNTRY MEADOW Rd Past Sak Single family Residential 23 HlllCREST Mnr Past Sale Single hmily Residenual 45 COUNTRY ln P8$ts..le SinctefarnilyResidentt.al 23PEPPERTREELn Past sale Sln&le fMnlly Reudential 12 HIUCllEST Past ~le Single Family ResidenUal 27823 CONESTOGA Dr Past S.:.k: Single Famlly Reidenllal 2212 POTRlllO Rd Pi!St sate Smgle f.mily ResldenllaJ 4952 RotUNG M!AOOWS Rd Past Sale Sln&ic F~ RWdent~I 29330 STONECREST Rd Past salt SlflC!e Famlly Residenllal 4428 VIA PAVION Pan Sale Sifl&le Famly Rl!Sldentlal 2G HIUCREST Pat~ Sin&Je FarniJr,t R~denti;al 32 COUNTRY MEADOW Rd Pi1$1: Sale Single F;1m1ly lmldentl<ll 4640 MMt.OMA Or Past Sale Sing!• F~11ndy ResKhintlal 210.UART£RHORSE Past Sale Single Farnilf ll11$1dentlal 40 MISTY ACRES Rd Past Sale Single Family lle$tdelltliil 4 MlSTY ACRES Rd P8$l Sale Stngle FamiJy 11.esidenllal 26SU OUNWOOO Rd PaM Sale Singlf! family Residenlial 42 l'llllCREST Md"Mo Pat S1k! Slft&le filmlly Residentliil 3G SANTA BELLA Rd Past sale Sing!• Family Residentliil lS03 North PALOS VERO£S Or North Past Sale Single F-mr Residenti.11 3 5UNNVAElO Or Past Soole Single Family Residential 8 Roanwaod D1 Past S..!e Slnale Family Residential 3G EMPTY SADOl..E Ln P.astSale SingleFwnilyResidentlal 5Sllverbllln Past Sale SlflJle Family Resldltrotliil 27760 PALOS VEROE.s Or PanSal111 SlngleFamilyResidential 3571Larlatln PastSale Sln&leFamllyReslder.tlal 9SAl>OU.HORNLn PastSille Singleftll'lllyResldential 48CAYUSf.ln PastSalfl SingleFamllyResidel\t~ 18511versaddleln PilStSalit SingleFamilyRnidenti.! 23SORRELln Pas1Sale SlnglefamllyResldenlial 10Slhlerbilln P.as!Sak! SinglefamilyResi~ntlal 27730CONESTOGADr PztSak! SlngJefamilyR~ntlal 2252CARRIAGEDI P..st Sa~ Sin11le Family Resklentl.il 4 EN CANTO Dr Pnt sale Single Family Residentla.I 5220 WIUOW WOOD Past Sale Sln&Je Family Residential 2666 lOFT'YVlEW Or P.ast s.Je Sln11le Family Residential 4709 ROUANDO Or PastSile Sln&leFamilyResidenti.1 lSILVER.5ADOULt1 Past Sale Single Family Res•de-nt~ 21 MOCCASIN Ln Past Sale Single Family Aesidenllal 4924 ELMDALE P.a!it Sale Slnale Family Residenlial 12 8ROKEN80W Ln Past sale Sln&ie Family Resldentlai ~5 MOCCASIN Ln PilSl~ SlnglefamilyResittential 3457TANGLEWOOOL11 Pa;st Sale Smgle Family RiHidentLll 4811 EtMOAU: Or PilSl 5. Single Fam1ly R~tdem.ial 10 COUNTRY MEADOW Rd P.astSak! SlllglefamllyResidential ?Misty~Rd Past 5,.Jt. S!n&le Family Rr.oi<Wntial 9 HARBOR SIGHT 01 Pat Sak! 5in11le Family Res!Oential 24 HILLCREST Mdw Pa$t Sale Single Family Res1dent1al 29310 QUAil WOOD Of P2" Sak! Single Family Resid~tial 4807 BROWNDEER ln P.1$t Sale SlnPe Family Res!dent1,.1 2022 VIA NOVA P;nt Sale Single Famll'/ Residential 3 SANTA BEUA Rd Pa:sl Sale Single Famil'/ Resl~nllill 2622 LOFTYVIEW Or Past Sa~ 5inglf! Filmily Residf!nlial 271S North PALOS VE ROES Or QI( ~ Rolling Hill$ EWlles CA RollingHl!lsE.stales CA Rolling Hills £:states CA Rolling Hi!l5 EsUles CA RollingHillsEst:nes CA RolhngHillsEstates CA Rolllnc Hills &tat es CA RolhngHlllsEstat11$ CA RollingHitlsEstat.s CA Rolll1111HillsEstale!; CA Roll1ngHills£states CA Rolling Hills Estates CA Rolling Hslls E$tates CA RoU1ncHlllsbtates CA Rolh0&HillsEstates CA RollingHillsEsti!les CA Rolling Hills Estates Rol!ingHillsEstate Rolling Hilb &tale CA Rolllng Hilb Est•tes CA Rolling Hills Estates CA RoHlngHllkEstates CA RolUngHlllsEstatl!S CA RolllngHlllsEslate. CA RollincHilkbtatl!S CA Rolling Hiiis Estates CA Rolll"&HillsEstatl!l CA floU1ngHlllsbtatl!S CA RolllngHillsEslatl!S CA RolllngHlll5hutes CA Rollln&Hllb;Estat&\ CA Rollln&HlllsEstates CA Rolling Hiiis Estates CA RoMint Hills &tates CA Rolling Hills Uwtes CA RollingHl!lsEJtatl!S CA PalosVltfdesb.tates CA RoHingHlllsU~es CA flotlingHillsEnata CA RolhngHillsEsl.ates CA Rolllnc Hiiis Estates CA Roltinc Hiib &tale$ CA RolliflC Hiiis Estatl!S CA RoUingHllls&tates CA RolllngHlllsUtates CA Roning Htlls hi.ales CA RolllngHllls£stetes CA Rollmc Hiiis htates CA RollingHlllsE$1atl!S CA RolllngHlll:sbtatli!$ CA Rolkt1gHlllsb1ates CA l\aochc>Pa.lw.\'el'des CA RollincHlllsEstates CA Rollint Hills btates CA Ratid>oP~Verdes CA Rolllnc Hilb E!.u1es CA RolllntHlllsEstatts CA RollinaHlllsbt3le$ CA Ro!llngHll/J.EstiJles CA RolllngHllb&tates CA RollingHillsEstata CA Ro!llntHllbE!.tates CA Torrance CA Rolllng Hiiis Estates CA Rolkn&HlllsEslttes CA Rolin>' Hills Estal~ CA Ri:illina Hill$ Est:ates CA Rdlin& Hilb &titles CA Rotting Hilb Estatl!S CA RolhngHill!.Esta1es CA Rollm11 Hills Wates. CA RolhngHillsUtales CA Rolhnt:Hills.Estall!S CA Rol!mg Hiiis. Ulates CA Rolhng Hiib &tat.$ CA Rollin& Hiiis Estatl!S CA flolhl\f;HdlsEstates CA Lomita CA RolUng Hills Estates CA Torr....-;e CA RolUngHills Estilll!S CA llf ~!SQi 90274 679900 90274 90274 475000 90274 90274 579900 90274 4GSOOO """ 902?4 S49000 90274 90274 90274 13700:>0 90274 965000 90274 90274 90274 895000 90274 995000 90274 899000 90274 ~ 90274 1275000 90274 1295000 90274 3999000 90274 ll50000 90274 197SOCO 90274 869000 90274 l5!l5000 90274 1295000 90274 795000 90274 1295000 90274 90274 90274 lm!lOO 90274 899999 90275 106000CI 90274 9SOOOO 90274 zosoooo 90274 1899000 90274 l.599ClOI? 90274 1495000 90274 la990IXl 90274 lSCXXXlO 90274 ll50000 90274 1429000 90274 90274 1S99000 90274 2699000 90274 90275 90274 90274 1300000 9027> 90274 90274 1875000 "'274 90274 90274 1175000 90274 1175000 90274 849000 ""°' 750000 90274 .!99000 90074 925000 90274 t39SOOO 90274 799000 90274 789888 90214 1399000 9027.4 1599000 90274 10990')0 90274 1589000 ''"'' 1950000 90274 90274 1319000 90275 879000 90717 689000 90274 1250000 90505 559000 90274 2795000 !!!!:!1 rn rn ~~~~~YB!..1m..hlll™ ~ OfllG!NA!SQURCE 2.S 2148 1172 1978 1 G¥ag~ 7/25/2012 $ G75,0CO http:f/www. C"llfomiaR~P822308 DomaPtopertiei,Jnc. 2 1590 1914 8{27/2011 S 218.SOO htJ;p:/Jwww.redfln.com/CA,/Rol~ns·Hll~E!.tatti/B-CV?ress-Way-90274/home/7'50640 l.7S 987 91078 20Ctl 1 Garag~ 3/S/20H $ 460,000 htt.p://www. CaliforniaRe.PV12153S65 RE/MAAhtateP1opertl6 4 2676 1991 12/31/2012 S ill,500 hnp://www.redf1t1.com/CA/Rol6ng·Hllls·Estata/27·Hiffett5l·Mdw!.-90274/unit·31/home/77"48093 U77 91078 2008 1 Gar;av 6127/2012 S 579,900 http:/jwww, CidiforniaRe.512039170 Srott.AnastniRHll)' 987 91078 2006 1 Garage 3/5/201"3 S 46!i.OOO http://www. Cahforn1a Re. PVl.3006380 RE/MAX Estate Properiies 670 2008 7/24/2012 S 285,000 http://www.tedfin.com/CA/Rolline-H~h-Estatei/901·0eeP.V~~-Dr·902.74/unit-213/homie/21917a56 1501 20C6 2 Gar~e 9/8/2012 $ 549.000 http://www. Ctlifomia Re V12082fi74 RE/MAX Estate Properties 2184 1974 6/U2012 5 620,000 ht1p:l/www.rtdfm.com/CA/Rolling·H1lls-btates/l7-Avoc.ado-ln-90274/home/77SOSBa 2.7S 2424 1U72 19EO 2 Garace S/7/2012 S 875,000 htlp://www. Cahfornia Re S11159G61 Coldwell Banke• Reiiden11-I 2.75 2613 18679 1931 3 Giiraef' 9/21/'2012 $ 1.310,000 http:l/www Califomia fte. Vl2093538 A.B. ltrltitments 2475 4857 2002 2 Gaf"81e 10/10/2012 $ 950,000 hup://www. California Re. 512112399 C-21.11.mbef Realty 1771 10654 1956 2 Gar.iae 6/29/2Qt2 S 910.000 http;l/www. Cotriforma Re 512050855 KeUer Williams Realty 1705 9~2 1957 2 Garage 8/24/2012 $ 785,000 http:J/www. cahforma R~. VU088795 Prudentirll Cillifomla Really 2 1476 10012 19S6 2 Garage 311/2013 S 895,000 http;/Jwww. Cal!fomtaRe.SD13008074 ICelluW111iamsRealty 2.S 1901 19233 1%2 2 Garage G/27/'2012 $ 990,000 htlp:l/www. cahfor111<1 Re. V12050944 RE/MAX Est.rte Properties 1.75 1536 14202 1956 1 Gai".qe 10/15/1012 S 818,888 http:/J-w, California Ra. 5120&0564 Peters Realty Center, In' 4.5 3502 21140 1959 3 Gilrage S/7/2012 S l,920,000 htt.p:/lwww. calltomiaRa.V12057S31 RE/MAAEstatePropenle. 2.5 23SO 28240 1959 6Gara&e 6/21/2012 5 1.195,000 htt.p://www.Callf~Re.Vll0709SS RE/MAXEs18leP(l)ptitie 3 2342 1957 3 Garage 6/27/2012 5 1,120,000 http://www. Califomia Re. 512061050 Kint: Harbor RealtOD 5.75 S400 20580 2011 l Garage G/6/2012 S 3,999,000 http://www. California Re. VU071864 Pruden1W California Realty 201\) 13!.43 19S6 2 G11ra,;e 11/19/2012 S 1,lSG.000 http://www. Citlifomlafte.P'.'Ul28392. KellerWll!mmPakisVerdt$ 42SO 17481 1!$3 6 G•rage 8/24/2012 S 1,950,000 http://www. California R~ Vl.2073~ RE/MAX Estilte P(l)ptitles 1832 9055 19S6 2. Garage 4/18/2013 S 865.000 http://www. callfomta Re. PVl.3043944 Ke~ WJllWM Palos Verdes 2.75 894 44159 19.a.7 2 Garqe 12111/2012 S 1,499.000 http://www. CaliforniaReV121D3171 RE/MAXEstaleProj)t!l1les 2.75 3092 15836 1962 3 G•raae 6/412012 S l,267,500 http://--CalifomiaRo.512038440 NWREBrolurn l.75 1714 23839 19~3 8 Garage 12/4/"l.OU S 760,000 http://www. CalifomiaRe.5704889 e-llstState.cnm 3 2621 28863 1SU 3 G;irace 10/4/201:! S 1.300.000 http://www-c.llfomlaRe.Vl2104579 RE/MAX&tatePropertles 4.S 4124 197&4 1998 3 Garqe 12/3/2012 $ 2.200.000 hnp:/fwww, CalllornlaRe.Slll2127860 NWREB1okers 4 4173 14l52 1919 3 Garap 1/11/2013 $ t,8i8,000 hnp:J/www. C..lilomiaRu.5812146908 Home Team Rutty 2.Si 2475 2.2940.t 2002 2 Garage 3/20/2\)13 $ 1,050,000 http://www. Ca11forn111Rfl..S813011434 KellerWlllialnsPa~Vt1dt!. 5 4647 19789 1998 3 Garage 4/1/2013 S 2,102,S00 http://www. c..ufomi• Re. Vl2121556 RE/MAX btlll:il Propeitles l.75 1602 12672 1957 2 Garage 10/26/lOll S U5,000 httPCJfwww. CallfonllilR!!.Vl2092276 KellerWllllamsPalosVerdes 1.75 2828 14008 1957 1 Ga1ag~ 1/16/1013 4 1.201.000 tittp:JfVlww, Callfornla R .. PVl.2138754 Coldwell Banbr·PV/Bch. Otles 1 2200 10977 1954 2 Garage 6/lS/2fJl2 $ !!OJ,000 hllp:jjwww. Wfomla. R@. 512036162 NWR£ Srokers 2165 9492 1961 2 Gar.ace 7/20/2012 S l.OG0.000 hltp://www. c.mfomi.1 Re. Vll007402 The Real£stale Group 2074 8721 1965 2 Garage 1/27/2012 S 835.000 http://WW*. Caflfomfa Re. 512041418 Exit Realty hperu 4801 20054 1999 3 Garar:• 9118/2012 S 2.0SO.OCO hUp://www. c.llforniake-Vl20IS7652 RE/MAIC.EsttteP~les 4.5 4092 19179 1979 3 Garage 10/lJ2012 S 1,800,000 http://www. callfomiaRt!.Vl20669S6 Co~IBal>M!rP.VJ.SO...th~ l.5 2930 lJ.843. 2012 2 G.u:age 10/3/2012 S 1,560.000 http://www. CalitomiaRe.VU08266S RE/MAXEstat•Propenies 3.25 4149 17811 1981 2 ~· 10/4/2012 s 1.400,000 htt.p://www. caltfornia Re. VU07951S Coldwf!ll Banbt P.V./South 8ay 4 4000 18831 1979 4 Gar<ljle 10/16/.2\)12 $ 1,840,000 http:/Jwww. Cakfom1aRe..VUl01384 KeilerWiUiamsPal05Verdes 3.25 2889 2~S2 197'9 3 Gara,:• 10/19/2012 $ 1.450.000 http://www. California Re. V12104061 RE/MAX btate P1opertiu 3.5 2082 10427 1956 2 Garqe tl/2l/2012 S Ll40.000 hnp://www CaldDtmaRe.V12103812 R[jMAX&talePropertif!S 3.S 2700 5SOO 1991 3 Garcig~ 3/SflOll $ 1,370.000 hnp:/jwww. Califom>a l\e. PV:U023992 RUMAX Estate f'ropertle 2.2S 2162 24647 1959 2 Garaiie l/6/2013 $ 1.013,000 http://www. Califoniui Re. 5812133557 Rt/MaJt E:o:eo. Redondi:i BNdi 3.25 3477 21503 1990 3 Garate 3128/2013 $ L-4b0.000 http;//www. C..lifwn~ a~. Vl21239l3 Keller Williams Palos Venies 3.5 3652 20150 2010 6 GarilJlf! 4/9/2013 $ 2,400,000 http:/Jwww. Califoml.l Re. 5813020876 Shorewood ftHlton 3 2203 19~6 7/18/2012 s 92S,OCO http:/Jwww.redfln.eom/CA/RolUns:·Hllh-Estat.s/8-Ro.nwood-Dt-9027"/he>IM'/7728642 2.5 2119 23933 19611 4 Garate 8/2ll/2012 $ i,450,000 hrtp://www Callfoml• Re Vl2070294 IC!llef Wiiiiams Pel05 Verdes 2 2292 196S 9/6/2012 $ 1,050.00C http;//,,,_ 1Mf!n.comfCA/RoWng·Hllls-&tates}S-SU...rblt-Ln-90274fhome/7730713 4 3160 24241 1979 6 Gllf"age. 9/21/2012 S a.28,000 hnp:J/www. CafifamtaRe.V12099.&15 kellerWl/llamsPalosVerde$ 2 2592 1956 ')/18/2012 $ 1,000,000 http://www.~.com/CA/RoWng-Hllb·Esm.M/3571-l•riat·ln-90274/home/772SSal 2.25 2441 17899 1959 4 Gilf'"illt 1/8/2013 s l,130,050 http;/JWWN. caUfomlaRe.SU073939 KtlllerWllll"nsPalosVerdes 196! 2 G•raie 1118/2013 S l,025,000 http://www. California fte. Vl2069398 Rf/MAX btate Properties 1954 9/12/2012 $ 1,000.000 hllp:/jwww.rt>dfln.,om/CA/kolling-Hllb-Estates/l&-Slfver-Saddlc-ln-90274/home/7741998 4ll6 l.9043 1952 2 Garaee Sfl/2012 s t,875.000 http://-w. CalifomiaRe..V1207930i ColdwellBM!kerP.V,/SouthBay 3 3066 1968 4/4/2013 S 1.000.000 htt.p://www.redfln.com/CA/Rolllng-Hlll~-Estates/10-5!1verbtHn·90274/home/n30718 1.75 1897 13149 1956 2 Garate 3/6/2013 S 990.000 httri://www. California Rf. f'\/13006564 RE/MAA £swe Pmpertles 2.75 2603 12600 1955 2 G"rqe 4/18/2013 S 1.210.000 http://www. Callfornia l\e. PV1303S984 Keller Wlllfams/l.A Harbor 3.S 24:W 15711 1963 7 Garate l/4/2013 S 900,0CO http://www. Califomla Re. SSl.3035966 South Bay Realty Gal$ 2 1868 ltsro 1956 4 Garil£' S/4/2012 S 795,000 http://www. Callfomla Re. VlU45867 RE/MM E.nate Properties 2.S 2S46 S208 1954 2 Gar;Jte 5/15/2012 S 750.000 hllp;/Jwww. Qillfcm1a Re. .S.12032816 Sovth Say Brokers, In' 1.7S 2165 14693 1950 2 Garag' 5/17/201J $ 825.000 ht1p://www. c.lif<Jmia; Re. V12010281 RE/MAX Estate Pro~rtles 2.7S 2054 20CXJO 195-i 2 Garate 5/23/2002 S 838,000 http;//www. California Re. V1111563.4 K4tller Wlm.im Palos V•rdes 26!:1D 28872 1963 2 Garac~ 6/11/2012 S 1.300,000 hllp://w-. CattfomiaRe.Vl.2029246 Prudent~Cali!OlnLIRealty lS95 8364 19!'.6 2 Gilrace f>/12/2012 $ 786.500 http://www. California Re. Vlll63662 RE/MAX bt.te Propert.11!:5. 1841 12861 1957 1 Gar*tl~ 6/18/2012 S 781.000 hllp:/lww. UJlfomia Re. Vl2019389 Keller Wfllbms Palos Verdes 2.5 l40l 29660 19?"4 6 Garac' 6/25/2011 $ 1,240.000 http://www. Callfomia RoJ. V120583l3 Penlnsub Sothfl)y'~ lnt'I Rltv 5.25 SlOS 21602 1979 3 ~•ill' 6J20JXH1 S l.SS0,000 http://www. C:J«fomia Re. V12032787 RE/MAX £st.ate l>ropeflies 2.S 2153 lGOGS 1956 6 Garage 6129/2011. S 980,000 http;//-. Camo1ma ~ 512030459 Beach City Brokers 4080 20977 19'.19 3 Garait 7/6/2012 S t.SSC,000 http://www. Calrfornil!Re.l0.206SS01 GriffmRealEstate,lNC. 2917 19'.'9 8/l.S/2012 S l,S49,000 http://www.redfm.corn/OVRolhnc-H11b--E$tates/7-Ml$ty·Acrt$·Rd-90274/home/77478S7 5263 20370 1957 3 Gan11e 5/10/2012 $ US0,000 htt.p:}/www. Colkfotn1a Re. Vl2029967 Hunt111r M;i$.on Rully 2346 1991 2 G:u~e S/14/2012 $ 1,079,999 http;//www. c..fiforma Re. 512049580 TR We.a/th Manilgelflent I~ 275 2709 90S9 196! 3 G<1n1ge 6/21/2012 S 1.2!S,OOO http;.//www. Callfomiafte.Vl2044663 RE/MAK&tatePropertm 2364 24916 1960 2 G~e S/9/2012 S 857,000 http://www. CahformaRe.V12039S79 PeninsulaSOtheby'slnt'IRlly 2384 737& 1967 2 Gn:age 5/14/2012 $ 679,300 hnp;//www. Calilornia Rii. V1203n57 RE/MAX bate Properties 2.S 2425 17205 1957 2 Garage S/25/WU $ 1,100,000 hUp://www. calilDrnlaRe.Vl2029654 Coldwell8ankerP.VJ5outh8a-y l 1140 4998 1954 2 Gara1e 6/ll/2011. S S:i6,000 hllp:/lwww. californi• R~ 5l.205S547 Prudellllill callfornia l\e;ilty 4.25 5000 83635 1964 3 ~iiie 6/29/20t1 S 2.700,000 http'//www. Callfomia Re. Sl.1045016 Shorewood Realton INC C - 2 9 PastSale Slngl111Fam1lyRestdtnUal P11515.ale SingteFami!o/Ri:sldentl;ll PaslSale SlngleFarr11lyResidentlal PaslSele Slng!111familyResidentlal Pas!Salt< Seng!ehmif./Residenli.al PMISale Sing!efamif./Residenti:ll PzlSalr SinglefamtlyResldenti.al PastS•le Singkif;imilyResid-tnti.al PastSalt Slnglehmi..,.Resn.lenti.il Pas15ale SinglefamilyRes1dtnti;1I P41$tS.le Sin&lthfnllvResident1al Pas.ts.It SlngleFam1lyResid11ntilll PaslSale Sin1l11FamilyResidenti:ll Pas15.all! S1nglefamilyRes1dential Pasts.le S1nglefam1f./Reidenti;il Pattsahi Sin&lefamilyRes1def'll.i;il PlMSlle SlngleFam1lyRe1denti.il Past~ SingleFamolyRestdential PastSlle 5\1\gleFamilyRei!denttal Pi!StSale StngleFamolyResldentlill Pas.tSall! $tnjj:leFamdyResidentlal Past5alt SlngteFamllylte$ldentlal PM!Sale SingleFamllyResidential PastSale Sin1leF.amilyResidtnti.al Pas15ale SlngleF.amllyRtildenUal P115t5ai.SlngleFamilyRes~ PllStsale Singlefamifl/Resldential Pasts.all! Slnglef.amlfl/Resldent1~ PanSale stngleF.aml"itResldentlal Past5.ale SlnglnFamlfyAtiklentlaJ Pasts.ale Sin&lefamif./Resldenllal PastSile SinglaF.amilyRtildentlal PastSale SlngleFamllyResldentlal PastSale SlnaJeF.amilyJli:sidt!ntl.al P.ast Sa~ smve family Resldentlal Pll$tSale Singlef.~milyResidentlal hstSale SinaJef.amifyRes.U.ntlal P.zst5.ale SlnaJeFoimllyllesidl!ntlal Patt531t Sin&lef;mu!yRestdtntial Pasts.le SingleFamiho'Residential Past.sale SingltF:M>tlyR11S1denti.al Pas.tSalt Townhouse P.ll!Jt s.Jt Townhouse P.m1Sale Townhouse P.ml Sale TownhouH P.mt sale Townhol.OH P.mts.Je Townhol!M P.i.t ~le Townhouse PanSale TownhouM Pas.t Sale Townhouu PztSai. TownhoU$e Pas.tSale Tc.wnhouse Pas.t Sale Townhouse Pasts.Je Townhouse P;istSale Townhouse Pas.I.Sale Townhouse Puts.le Townhouse P~tSale Townhcu!.e P.zstSafe Townhouse PllSt 5.aJe TownhouH Pasts.ale Townhowe PaslSale rownhause Past.sale TQwnhouse Pasts,,!e TQwnhou$e Pas.l5.\le TQwnhouse P;ist541e Townhotae Past 5.ale Townhowe 46S98ROWNOEERtn 46 ENCANTO Dr llCeles1ePl SENCANTODr 4SANTACRUZ 7SC>Jrttln lOSllVERSADOLE 51 SANT A OIUl 16Ml5TYACRESRd 748UCXSltJNln 41 EMPTY SAODU Rd 35 EMPTY SADDLE Ln 460SMAIU.OMAOr 4651 MAIU.OMA Dr 37 ROLLINGWOOD D1 a PLEASANT Hill Dr S128ELMOAL£0r 45:l:lMAlttOMADr 120.EAR\llSTADr 5282 WILLOW WOOD Rd 4826R<Kkl>luffDr lOH!lLCRESTMdws 15 CO\IERED WAGON ln lOWUdh1meln SOSANTACR.Ul l8ENCANTODr 27Hidden\la»tyRd 17Countrvln 16 HARBOR SIGHT Dr 354DLARIAJln 11 AANONIEW Rd 27HORSESHOELn 40 SANT A SULA Rd 4 SILVER EAGl.i Rd 40PONYLn 50031\ockbluffDI 44 SHADY VISTA Rd 10 MASONGATE Dr 41 ~t" !MU.a Rd 7 VIA GRANADA l7VIAGRANADA !11 Ce>ttcwwood Qr l9 PEAR TREE Ln lO North SEAVIEW Dr 39SYCAMORELn 59CYPRESSW'J'! SPEAflTREElnlU 30ASPEH Way 137 COTrONWOOD ar 70 COTIONWOOO Cir 55ASPENW~ lSYCAMOflELn 1lOAKTREELn 80Crl!'SlaV•rditDr 102 COTIONWOOO Cir 109ASPENWay 10 SYCAMORE Ln ~CRESfAVERDE 987 SlLVER5PUR Rd 16PEMTREELn#2 SS CYPRESS Way 961.S.lverSpuiRd 961SllVERSPURRdlll 33SYCAMORE l.11 RQlbngHillsUtates RQlhngHillsbtate:s RQllmg Hilk hules RollingHUkEstales Ro!tingH~l!.Es1ates RoUingHill!.£5tiltes Jl.QIJms Hilb Esw:es Jl.oHmgHillsEstates RoUmgHdlsHtates RQlhngHillsEs!atlilS RolllngHllb Estates RollmgHilbEstate5 RQlhn&HilhEstates RQmn& HUb Esmes Rolhn&Hll1$Estatll$ R0Ui11&Hills£$1ates RQllingHillsEstates RQllingHlilsf.Mates RQllmgHilhEstal.es RQlllngHlllsUtata. RQIHngHlllllstilles Ro!UncHllisEsta1es RQllin&HillsUtares RollingHlllsEsl<des RQllircHlllsEstales RQl!ingHlllsEslates RQll!ngHU!iEs1ates RQllingHUll.Estates Roll1ngHllh&lates RohingHllG.Est4nes RoUlngHllls&tilfes Rolling Hills Estates RQllin&HilbEstales RolllngHUl!.£states Rolling Hiib Estates RQIWngHi!lsEstilles RQIUngHIUsEstates RQllingHillsEstates RolhngHHlsEstates RollingHillsEstatm RllngHlsEst RoillngHillsEst;rtes CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA 90274 739500 90275 899000 1475000 90274 90274 1085000 90274 1949000 9()274 90274 1129000 90174 3200000 90274 147500'J 90274 899000 90274 1425000 90274 1425000 90274 1329000 90274 2199000 90274 1299000 90274 !35000 90274 199SOOO 90274 $99C:X» 90274 1000000 90274 1590000 90274 1099000 90274 90274 90274 1499000 90274 90274 3199000 90274 89gOOO 90274 90274 90274 1699000 2395000 90274 90274 1649000 90274 14.3SOOO 90274 795150 90274 1295000 90274 90274 1079000 90274 U7SOOO 90274 90274 600000 2 25 3.25 2.l5 5.25 3.S 2 3.> 3.5 2 3 35 2.S 2 35 3.25 5.75 2 . 3.75 2.S 3.25 . 2.25 2.S 2 2.• 35 ' 25 16824 2189 13660 3610 18179 1852 2036 1588S 4005 17475 2442 1!64 17634 5150 278611 2869 18587 2384 24724 l22fJ 20196 3Ga0 17771 15424 16576 195S l-8419 2028 12055 4382 20105 1675 8345 1920 lS4S8 2950 20158 2855 9855 m• 2700 4036 12940 ''°' sm 2112 4173 -5192 24086 262! 24600 4036 l4731 3181 4312-4 139S 9390 2434 21627 1332 2685 13004 3725 20417 '"" 1792 303924 ""' 1965 ,.., '"° 2000 19S:S 2002 1979 1947 "'"' ,... l9s·1 '"'' "" 1990 "" 1955 "" 19SG 195' '"'' 1981 .... ,,., "" l9S'S "" ,,., 1951 1961 1951 1963 ,,., ,.., ,,., 4 G1ras~ 2 G'111ge 4 Garage lG.ar.age 2 Garage 2 Gar.age 3 Gar111 ... 3 G11r.ige 2 Garii&e 3 Garage 2 Gara1e 1. Garaie 4 G.ar:aee 2Gar~I! 2 G1r.agt1 l Gar.aaa 2 Garage 2 Giiritge l G.r.a&f 2 Gar~e 3 G'"'I" 3 Garac• 4 G.rage t Garage 3 Goiragto 10 G .. r.age 2 G.a..-.age 4 Ga,...ae 3 Garait• 4 Garage 1 Garil&e 2 Ga•age 36~· 2~rage 7/11/2012 s 7/B/20U 5 8/7/2012 s 8/1/1012 s 8/14/2012 s 5/4/2012 s 10/23/2012 s 4116/:WU S 3/S/2013 S 3/4/2013 s 2/5/2013 s 3/12/2013 s }/12/1013 $ 6/1/2012 s 10/2'3/lOU S l0/30/20U s 10/31/2012 $ 11/15/2012 s 12/20/2012 s 2/l/2013 s '2/l/2013 $ 2/l/2013 $ t/30/2013$ 2/4/2013 s 2/812013 s 3/8(2013 $ 4/9/2013 s 4/2S/2013 S S/l/20U $ 11/13/2012 s 12/18/lOU $ 12/2l/20U S 12/ll/2012 s 12/24/2012 s 11/29/2012 s ll/ll/2Dl2 $ 11/30/2012 s 5/16/2012 $ !121/2012 s 6126/2012 $ 9/27/2012 s t/!/2013 s 789,000 http://www. CalifomLa Re 512069734 Coldwell Slinker Res!dential 899,000 hltp://www, CaUfomla Re Vl2064218 R£/MAX E.st.ate Propenles 1,.415,000 hnp:flwww. CaUfomla Re Vl2068l02 Coldwell fmtkef·PV/Bch. Cities 1,020,000 http;/ /www.11dfm.com/CNP.Qlhng·Hllls·Estat~/l.3-Celesle-PJ.90274/hrmie/773019l 1,000,000 http://www. Califi:imla Re. Vl2017209 RE/MAX Estate Ptopenit-s 1,845.000 http:j/w-. California Re VU1ll736 Penlnsub;Sotheby'slnt'IRlty 1.100,000 http;//www.redfin.wm/CA/Jl.ollln:·Hills-Emtes/7·SorreHn-90274/home/7730656 U70.000 http://www. Uliforrua R•· P\113025438 RE/MAX Estate P~les l,100,000 http://www. CalifomQ R11. P\112142693 Coldwtll 8a~-P\l/8th. Cities 1,575,000 hnp:j/www. California lie. P\113016029 RE/MAX E~t..ie Prcipetlies 855.000 http://-. CalifomiaR11 512119010 KellerWilliall'ISPak>$Vottdn 1,425,000 http://www. Cahfomia Re. 5813006375 Ptuden1ial California Ile.my l,390,000 hltp://w-. Califorma Rt Vl2ll0219 RE/MAX btiJ\e Pri:ipert1es t,26S,OOO hllp;//www. Clilifomi;a fte. VU003773 Prudential Oliforni. Realty l,OS0,000 http://www. California lie 5U06S1.a9 Seadl City~ 1,2lS,OOO http!J/www. CaliformaRe.VUl03554 Poen1Mui«SOthtby'slnt'lRlty 800.000 hup://www. california Re.5120Ji37l ShorewQQd REALTORS 1,925,000 http;//WNW. California Re V121131S2 REJMAX Estill• Pmpmi~ 831,500 http://www California Re 512119119 forecart Realty Int. 985,000 hllp:l/www. c..lifomlaR•-SUU04l4 R•/MiillfxKSRPV l.525,000 http://www. California Re. P\112149163 Keller WHUams Palo!. Verdes 1,089.000 http;//www. califQmiafle..SUll.9223 PalmRealtyBouUque 781,000 http://WW>N.redfln.aim/CA/Rol!lng-Hllls-Enaes/482S.Rodbluff·Dr·~74/hQme/7742679 1,lS!l,000 http;//www. C.allfomla Re. V12DBn67 Penlnsula Propeltie$ 1,420,000 http://www. Cellfomi.1Re.Vl2113062 PenlnsulaSothebv'slnt'll\Jty l,OJS,000 http://www.redfln.com/CA,,IRQIUng•Hflb-btate.s/10-WIJdhorse-Ln-90274/h111n./7728699 2,800,000 http://www. c.lifomlaRe.S81300S307 Shorr.uQOdRHltQISINC 840,000 http://www. CallforniaRa.13-651455 PlushH-..lnt'IR•.vtv 1,'2SO,OOO http://www.redfln.com/CA/lloUlnc·HUb-EsUte:./27·Hidden·V~\ey-Rd·90274/h~728380 1,615.000 http://www.tedfln.com/CA/Rlilling·Hllls·bute:;/17·"1unlry·Ln-90274/home/7747743 1,650,000 hup//w-. Ollfoml' Re. Vl.204S665 R£/MAX Estate Properties 2.300,000 http://www. Califlmlla Re Vl2101477 Keller WU!larns Palos ventti. 1,300,000 http://www. callfomla Ile. Vl212S030 C.11 Really l,640,000 http://www. C.aliforn!a Re. V12121934 COidweil Sanker P.VJSouth Bey 1,380,000 http://'!fWW. Cdlfomia Re. Sl.2097364 Shol"eWoQd Realt~ 850,000 http:J/Nww. Callfomla Re. 12-618145 Rodeci Realty· Bevetfy Hills 1,240,000 http://www. California Re. SU07l302 ShctewQOd l\EALTO!li 450,00'.l http://www.redfln.com/CA/Rolllnc·Httb·Estate.s/5003-Rod:bMf·Dr·9027Wii:ime/7142S22 900,000 hllp://www. Cilliforn~ Ile. 512064154 Re/M«i. ~ R.dondo Baach 1,311,000 http://www. Clld"i:imiaR .. vl.2065949 Coldwl!ll8ankerP.V./South8ay 329,000 http://www.redfln.com/CA/Rllnc-Hb-Esl/41-santa--Bell>Rd-90274/hQrn./1741886 605.000 http:lfwww. CalifQfnla Re. SUUOS45 Hunttt M:tsQn Re:ttly Rolling Hills Estiltes CA 90274 6SOCXX> 3 2..25 1792 303924 1968 2 Garage 3/22/2013 S 650.0CO http://www. Calife>mia R .. PV130079~ Cotdwen Banl<et·PY/8th. Cibes RoUmg Hiiis fst:;ites CA 90274 635000 3 2.5 2006 303924 196! 2 GaJilgt 7/30/2012 $ 625,000 http://www. California Re. \112076109 RE/MAX Estate ~ies RQ/lmg Hills Esl:ates CA 90274 3 3 1994 1974 9/7/20U S S!I0,000 http:f/www.redfm.com/CA/Roillng-Hilb·fst:«es/ll·Cl.ftlonwQOCf..Clr·90274/home/77505S6 RQUmgHillsUtate CA 90274 91SOOG 3 3 2500 2612 1978 2 GaF31e 9/ls./2012 S 8!3,000 http:/1-w. CaflfomiaRe.SUOU57), ShoriewoodRealtQn, koUma Hills Estate CA 90214 625000 2 2.2S 1794 6581 1973 2 G.arq"' 9/20/2011 S 610.000 http://www. California JW. 512088259 Prudenti.il Califomla: A.malty ltoUmg Hill$ btates CA 90274 699000 2 2 1590 1823 l97S 2 Gar11ge 10/19/2012 S QS,000 hUp://www. Wfonua a.. Vl2085S07 Penln5ula Sotheby's Jnt'I P.lty ltQU1ngHilbEstates CA 90274 774000 2 3 218A 2185 1974 2 <i-ra&t t/lS/2013 S 150.000 http://www. Caltfornialt•PV12127284 R(IMAXbtillePtoptrtim. Rolling Hills bl.ates CA 90274 780000 l U 2025 2938 197! 2 Gas.gr 3/14/2013 $ I00,000 http://www. California Re. PVll000846 Azusa Realty ltolh111HUbEsl'l'tflS CA 90274 798000 3 2.75 2184 1939 1975 2 Garaiie 4/3/"2013 S 790,000 http:/fwww. CafllomlaRe.S8130010'J6 RE/MAXEstatePropertlu RQUingHIJlsblata CA 90274 765000 3 2.5 1988 1354 1976 2 G11~e 4/9/2Q13 S 740,000 http;//www. Californf•b.Pl36647 Century21SunnyHllls Rol!lngHU!sfst:ates CA 90274 859000 3 2.25 1796 2105 1974 2 G1r.11• 4/12/2013 $ 845.000 hltp://www. Callfomlalte.PV13016150 ColdwellS.nll.l!f·PV/Bth.Otles Ro!llngHllbEs1ates CA 90274 199000 2 2..25 1961 1975 2 G•r.ige 5/10/2012 S ns,ooo http://www. ClllifornlaRt.V1l036033 CQldWell8ankmrP.V./South8.ay RQJHngHilb Estates CA 90274 799000 3 3 1184 1937 197• 2 Garage S/2S/')J)12 S 800.000 http://www. C.llliformaRe.V1204812l l'enlmul•Sotheby'slnflRlty Romng Hills &mes. CA 90274 749000 3 L75 lS90 1968 197~ 2 Garq• 5/31(2012 S 725.000 htlp;//www. C.lifomla Re. Vl201718S REJMAX Est.al• Properties RQ!ling Hiiis Estat~ CA 90274 3 3 20J4 1972 3/12/2013 $ 82:5,00'.l http://www.redfln.tl1l'ft/CNRQfHng·Hllls·htllle5/W-Crt:Stot-Verde-Dt-90274/homen747SOO RQ!UngHllls&1ates CA 90274 849000 3 2.S 1888 2111 1974 2 Ga~e 7/18/2012 $ 842,000 http;J/www. CaflfomtaRt.Vl20643ll RE/MAX Est.ate Properties RQllingHilir.blata CA 90274 689000 2 2..25 1994 197S 2 Ga•ag<.' 7/ll/2012 S 615,000 http://WVIJW CallfomiaRe.Vll060948 Penlm.ul•Sotheby'~lrit1Rlty RQllingHUkbt~les CA 90274 699900 2 2.75 21.M 1941 1977 2 Gar.age 7/27/'lOU $ 6!5,000 http://www. Californi•Rt.Vl2070126 PeninsulaSOtheby'slnt'IRlty RQlllll& Hills Estates CA 90274 510000 2 2.5 1400 1972 1. Gil•aa.t 10/30/2012 $ 490,000 http://www. Callfoml;a Re. VU081891 RE/MAX £.slate PJopertles RQlbng H!lk Estates CA 90274 9aooxl l 3 2l77 37297 2009' 2 G11r.age 12122/201.l S 895.000 hnp:J/www. California Re VU10618l RE/MAX Estalt Prop.rtles RQlhnaHlll!.ht~es. CA 90214 939000 3 3 233& 1684 19711 2 Garage 12/28/2012 $ 925,000 hllp://www. (al/fQffllaRt.PVUl.54142 KellarW/llJarnsPalo!.Verdes RQlhnc Hills £.slates CA 90274 698000 2 3 2184 nas 1974 2 Garage-6/29/2012 $ 732,000 hUp://www. Cl~fomla M•· Vl20634ll REJMAX bt"1.• p~ RQlijnt: Hilb Est"1:es CA 90274 l 3 1893 2010 8/7/2012 $ 547,000 http;//www.rltdfln.tQm/CA/RQlllng·Hlfu·Estill.es/961-Silller..spur.Rd·90274/holnf!/A0040497 RQllingHl!lsEstates. CA 90274 549900 . 2 2.5 1600 2010 2 G'ltage 8/1/2012 S 547,000 http://www. C..1ifomiaRe.VU070082 U:ildwell8anker·PV/Bch.Ot1es RQltif11HllbEslat~ CA 90274 688000 2 2 1590 2037 197~ 2 Garage 9/27/201'1. S 669,@ hllp;//www. CabforniaRe-.Vl2095l!ll t.avl&As5ocl.a1es MEDIAN 2370.S 196! $ 1,000.000 C - 3 0 SALE TYPE HOME TYPE ADDRESS .Q!l fil6ll ile UST PRICE BEDS l?8!!:§: ~ LOT stZE YEAR BUil" PARKINGS PARklNG 1 ~ L.AS! SALE PRI URL !SEE htte: SOURCE USTING lD ORIGINAL SOURCE Pas.tSale Sin~FamllyResldential 30CHUCKWAGONRd RoUlngHills CA 90274 1495000 4 2.25 2557 41851 1958 2 Garage 4/22/201:. $1,354,SOO htqr.//www.nCaliforniaReaPVl30lSSCPrudent!alcallfcmi1Realty PastSale SJngleFamllyResldentlal nEASTFIELDDf' RoUlngHills CA 90274 2519000 6 5.25 4466 111586 1956 5 Garage 1/31/2013 $2,500,000 http:/lwww.nCallfornlaRea V121164~RE/MAXE!tatieProperUe$ Past sale Single Family R~ldential 39 EASTFIELD Dr Rolling Hills CA 90274 1075000 4 3 2183 37014 1953 2 Garage 3/6/2013 $ 1,175,000 http://www.n CRISNet MLS SR121513:: Allied Realty lrtc Past Sale SingleFamilyRestdential 1 Packsaddle Rd E RoUingHllls CA 90274 S 7 8510 2000 6}5/2012 S S,800,000 http://www.redfin.com/CA/Rolling-Hills/l·Pad:saddle-Rd·E-90274/home/7739235 PastSale SingleFamilvR~idential 12JOHNSCANYONRd RollingHills CA 90274 3499000 6 S.25 6530 89441 1977 3 Garage 1/16/2013 $ 3,300,000 http://www.nCaliforniaRea S12122007ShorewoodRealtorstNC Past sale Single family Residential 23 CABALLfROS Rd Rolling Hills CA 90274 3675000 4 3.25 3800 48288 1953 3 Garage 3/15/2013 $ 3,670,000 ht'ql://www.ri caUfornla Rea SB130443C kellf!'r WllUams Realty PastSale SlngleFam/lyR.esldentlal 260NOiRINGRd RolllngHills CA 90274 3099000 5 3.S 4075 59241 1978 3 Garage 4/10/2013 $ 3,0S0,000 http://www.riC&JlfornlaRea V120743l.t:PrudentlalC41ifornlaRealty Past Sale Single Family Residential 15 PORTUGUESE BENO Rd Rol!Jng Hills CA 90274 1300000 4 3 243G 52239 1937 3 Garage 7/25/2012 $ l,400,000 http://www.ri California Rea V1206086~ Keller Wllliall'I$ Palos Verdes. Past Sale Slngle family Residential 3 OUTRIDER Rd Rolling Hills CA 90274 2068000 4 3.5 3000 54149 1981 10 Garage 10/5/2012 $ 1,967,SOO http://www.rl Callfornla Rea V1204S34: Keller Williams Palos Verdes Past Sale Single Family Residential 32 South MIDOL£RIDGE ln Rolling Hiiis CA 90274 3200000 5 4 4183 115778 1978 3 Garage 10/17/2012 $ 2,870,000 http://www.n Callfornl• Rea Sl208536C Keller Willlams Realty Past Sale Single family Residential 80 SADDLE BACK Rd RoUlngHllls CA 90274 4299000 3 3 3037 307573 1954 3 Garage 10/25/2012 $ 3,500.000 http://www.t1 caUfornla Rea V1210710~ RE/MAX EsUte Properties Past Sale Stnglf!' Family Residential 86 East CREST Rd Rolling Hills CA 90274 1269000 S 3 3056 33557 1950 3 Garage 12/28/2012 $ 1,250,000 http://www.n Callfornia Rta Vl.204303! RE/MAX Estate Properties PastSale SingleFamllyResldential 38PORTUGUESEBENDAd RollingHil15 CA 90274 3500000 7 6.5 6100 221284 1952 10 Garage 5/25/2012 $ 3.300.000 http://www.r1CallfornlaRea Vl106S38;RE/MAXEstatePtopertfes PastSale Single Family Residential 2EastRING61TRd RollingHills CA 90274 1450000 3 2 2909 57414 1955 2 Garage 6/1}2012 $1,500.000 http://www.r1CaUfornlaRu V120446nR£/MAXEstateProperties Past Sate Slngle Family Residential 2 Williamsburg Ln Rolling Hills CA 90274 4 4 3187 1941 3/1/2013 $ 2,895,000 http;//www.redfin.com/CA/Rolllng-Hllls/2·Wllllamsburg-l.n-90274/home/Bl39791 Past Sale Single Famlly Residential 25 EASlFIELO Or Rolling Hiiis CA 90274 1250000 3 US 2256 43137 l9Ei5 2 Garaae 4/26/2013 $ 1,100,000 http://www.n caHfornia Rea S1202519E Keifer Williams Realty Past Sale Single Family Residential 9 South MIDDLERIOGE Ln Rolling Hills CA 90274 4750000 S 6 5648 247856 1963 lS Garage 7/18/2012 $ 3,850,000 http://www.r1 Callfornffi Rea V1010170: KelletWl!liams Pales Verdes Past Sale Slngle Family Rl!Sldentlal 11 UPPER BLACKWATER CYN Rd Rolling Hills CA 90274 4750000 3 3 3197 40'996o 19Sl 20 Garage 7/26/2012 $ 4,100,000 http://www.r1 California Rea Vl114842i RE/MAX EsUte Ptoperlies Past Sale Single Family Resldential 0 BUGGY WHIP Or Rolling Hills CA 90274 5375000 6 5.75 5785 86835 2004 4 Garage 12/28/2012 $ 4,600.000 http://www.ri Cllllfornfa Rea 5684868 First Team Real Est1te Past Sale Slnglt! Family RH!dentlal 57 EASTFIELD Dt Rolling Hills CA 90274 1400000 2 2 2147 65307 1955 2 Garagf!' 9/13/2012 $ 1,400,000 http:/lwww.r1 callfornia Rea V1211502l RE/MAXfstate Properties Past Sale Single Family Rl!lfdf!'ntlal 20 CINCHRING Rd Rollins Hills CA 90274 2995000 3 2.S 3361 74520 1973 3 Garase 9/20/2012 $ 2.850,000 http-.//www.n ca!Jfornla Rea Vl207647.t Pruden ti al (aflfornJa Realty MEDIAN 3197 1956 $ 2,1170,000 C - 3 1 ~~ Past Sale Condo/Coop Past $.lie Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Salfi Condo/Covp Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Pasl Sale Condo/Coop Pas! Sllkr Condo/Coop PMt sale Smcl@Family Reident1al P:astS.ale S1ngieFamilyRas.Ki.-nt1al PanSale Si11glef=illyR~ial PastS..le Single-FamilyResidenu;il PastSale SinglefamltyResidf!nUal Past Sale Sintle Fan»fv flesKlM!.1111 PastSale SincJef~Rnidantial Pad Sale Si• fami!y Residential P~Sale Si~FM00vR~nUal PastSale SinglefarnltvResident1al Pan Sale Sing.le famtty Residential PastSllle SinclefmitlyResidenti~ Pasts.le SlnglehmilyReskfentlal P05tSllle SucleFamilyResidential PastSllle S1111ief~lyR1!$1dentJal PastSale Sinf:lefamii)oResodential Pasl5* Sinf:5'!fam1iyResldential Pasl Sale Sintle family RM<d1mtial Past5ale Sint:leFamilyRes.idenual Pan S..le Single family llesldtnual Pll5t5llle SinslefamilyRakhintilll PastSale SlnglefamilyResidttntial PastSale Slnf!leFemllyResldl!ntlal PastS.ale SlnglefamilyRHkkmtial Pastsale SinglefamifyRestdentlal Pasts..le SinglehmllyResllHnllal Pasts.le SinglefamllyResidential P8" s.le S.n&le Family R~ntial Pasts.le SincleFamllyRaskktntbl Paslsale SlngiehmUyResklential Past541e S1nglefarnilyR~1al PllSlsale SinglefamilyResidl!nlial PastSM 5inglefamllyResidential Pi&t.Salt SinglefamilyRe:slckmtlal Pasts.ale SinglehrnilyResldtntial Pas15ale S.nclefamdyResldent~ Pasts.ale SinglefarnilyResidcnllal. Pasts.ii. Sini!ef.:tmilyRa1dtntu1l Past5ale Singlef.amllykesldential P•tSale SingleFamilyResid«nU..t PastSale SinglefamllyRuidential PastS.ie S.nt)efamilyRe51deritlal PastSaJe SlngleFarnilyResidential P;»t;Sale Slnglefam1lyResldent1al Past Sah! 5mgle Family Rr.udential Past5ale SmgleFilmlfvRatdential P.mSale SlngleF~lyResldantlal l'astSlila SingleFamilyRaident~ PastS.:tle 5!nclefamilyResld•ntlal PastSale SinglefM>llyResidenti.i PastSale Singlef.amilyllnide:ntial PastS.:tle Sing!.! FamdyRaKk!ntlal P.ut~le: S!nglefamilyllesid11lti.i PastSale SingleF.amtlyRnldential PastSale S111g)efamJ!yRes1dfilt1al PastSale SinglefamilyResKlenti»I Past5ele: SlngleFamilyReildentlal PastSale SlnglefamityReslchJnt~ Paf!Sale SingleFamilyResldentlal PastSale 5mglefamilyResldentlal PastSale: SinglefamilyResidenlllll P.astS.:tle SmglefamilyRcsidentlal PaitSale 5lnglefam1lyRuidem1al PaJtSale Smgl@familyResldential PastSMe SingleFamilyResident1al PanSele Slnglefa1JUlyResldentlal Past5.lle 5mglefamilyRill$1dentlal PastSale SlnglefatnllyRtildentiil Past.Sale S1nelefamllyResident1al P.asts.ale SlngleFamllyResklent1al P.;t$\S..le S1nglefamilyllill$idfntial ~ lSlS VIA CAMl'ESJNA 11206 2571 VIA CAMl'ESINA Unit G 2124 Pal~ V~d~ Or W 112 2334 PAI.OS VERDES Dr 117 2306 PALOS VERDES Or West #201 2322 West PALOS VERDES Or #102 2306 PALOS VERDES Or 11304 23l6 l'Al.OSVERDE5Df#7 2306 PALOS VERDES Dr #303 2201 VlA CARRlllO Umt 38 2508 Via Cam~ina #2 3004 PASEO OEl MAR 2100 PASEO DEL MAR 1271 VJA lANDETA 117VIAAlAMEDA 2928VJALASELVA 4029VIAPIMA 412SVIAlARG.AVISTA S64VJAMEOIA 2600 VIA SEGUNDA 1£.olVIABAllCHONA. Undisclosed 16761l1COPI 1108 PASEO DEL MAR 2S61CHELSEA.Rd 161'0.altonRd 1648VIAARRIBA 1316VUELTAPI 29 MOtiTEMAlAG.A 2220VIAACALONES 310CAllEOEARBOl.£S 1116 VIA NOGALES 9SlGRANVIAAlTAMlRA 2Sl1VIAANITA U7 VIA PASCUAL 1024 VIA PAl.E5TRA 1356 VIA ROMERO 3012Vi.alll....,ra 1103VIACVll.VA 1344 PAlOS VERDES Dr 1372VIACOflONEl Ull2VIAOLIVERA 15571/IAUON 1432 VIA COflONEl 1429VIACOll0NEL UIOJPEOAOPI 801\llACONEJO 1820 VIA ESTUOlllO 1113 VIA BORONADA 2516 PALOS VERDES Dr 1008 VIA fOfl.T\JNA ll2l VIAZUMAYA 1000VIAROMERO 2640 VIA PACHECO 1620VIAMONT£MAR 162SESf'INOSACu Undlscl0$td 133 VIA DEL MONTE 1304 VJA ROMERO 4428 VIA PAVION 2105Vlaferminde.t 2004VlaVlsalia 4252 VIA PINZON 344R1NCONLn 4037VIAPIMA 4312 VIA AlONORA 4445VIAPIN20N 1216 GRANVlAAlTAMIRA 4l09 VIA PICAPOSTE 3806 VIA PALOMINO 872 CALLE DE AABOLES l624NAVAJ01lt 6611MONER00r 64UMON£R00r 2205 VIA FERNANDEZ 2240\llALASREA 2423 VlASONOMA 1020 Wat PAlOS VERO~ Dr 2217VJAlA811£A 1120 GRANVIA A1 TAMIRA 2821VIAlA5ElVA. QI! P.:tlosVerdesbl.:ttei; P.alosVerdes&.tilles Palos Verdes Estates Palos Verdes Estates PalosVerde5E$tates PalosVerdesbtales PalosVerde5Estilles PalosVerdesEstilles Pala!. Verdes Estates Palos.Verde!IEstatu PalO!IVerdesEstates Palos.Veu:l~Estales PalosVerdfiEstates P.:tlosVerde5ESlilt1!$ PalosVerde$Estates P;iilo5VerdesEHil1ill$ PalosVerdesEslill~ PalosVerdeEstiltes PMosVerdfibtates f>alosVerde$btates Palos Verde btirtes PakJsVer~Estates PalosVetdtiEstilles P~VerdeEstates PalosVerde$Estille:s PMo!.\lerde:sE:stales PaiM.VerdesEstates PaioJVeul-sEstates PclosVerde:sEstates Palos Verdes Estates Redondo Beach P.alosVe:tdesEstates P.:tJosVerdesUtates PaJosveide:s&lat'1$ PalosV~E:states Palos Verdes Estates f>alosVerdesEstaies PalosVerdet.Estates P.alD$Vl!rrk!sEstacts PalosVerdo:s;Estates P.1losVerdesEsta1es P.:1losVe1d.$&tatt!:5 PalosVenle!>Est.ies PalosVerdesEstal'.1?$ Palos Verdes Estates Palos Verdes Estates PalosVl!rdtiesutes Paios.Ve:tdesEstat.s P.alosVerdes&tales PalosVttde$ESlilles Palo$Velde5&1ate:li P..!osVeutesEstates Palos Verdes Estates Palo5Verde$Estates Palos Verdes Estates PalosVerdMEstates PalosVe1de$Estates P.alosVerdesEstates P.a!PSVerdesEsl.:t!es PclosverdesEstates P11losVerdesEsta1.n PalosVerdMEslites PalosVerdesE5t;ites Palos Verdes Estates Palos Verdes Estates Palos Verdes Est.ates PalosVerdesEsbl.es Palos Verdes Estates PalosVerdes.Estaun P.alosVe1desEstates PalosVerdesEsufn Redondo~acli PalosVerdesEst~es RandloPalosVerdes RilllchoPaloslferdes PalolVerdesEstate:s PalosVerdesEstatl!!S PalosVe,das.Estates PalosVerdesEst.:t!es PalosVerdesEst.:ttes Palos Verdes Estates PalosVe:rde$Es1ates = CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA ~ ~~ 90274 569000 90274 90274 390000 90274 537000 90274 4990Cl0 90274 269900 90274 399000 90274 32SOOO 90274 519000 90274 2799000 90274 2750000 90274 2593000 9027< 24""'° .90274 l2Sl9000 90274 1649900 90274 2295000 90274 2399000 90274 2S98000 90214 2099000 90274 .399SOOO 90274 2990000 90274 1750000 "'274 1695000 2399000 90274 1295000 90274 2099000 902n 859000 90274 2199000 90274 1295000 90274 1545000 90274 975000 90274 1475000 90274 90274 2498000 90274 2395000 90274 1600000 90274 J.299000 90274 2399000 90274 m74 1695000 90274 1649000 90274 13900Xl 90274 1495000 90274 1095000 90274 13SOCO> 90274 2693900 90274 1250000 90274 995000 90274 1575500 90274 90274 978CXK> 90274 .ll500DO 90274 1788000 90274 1899999 90274 950000 90274 90274 90274 899000 90274 6soooo:J 90274 1099000 90274 1750000 90274 2100000 90274 1165000 90274 2295000 90277 879000 90274 169CXXlO 90275 850000 828000 90274 1425000 90274 1945000 90214 1998000 90274 1550000 90274 179SOCO ~ iQfI .bQ!..filli ~PARKING~~~~ J.l.Bl...lm..h.™ ~ ~ 2 2 1213 16723 1971 2 Garage 5/8/2012 $ 550.000 http://www. C..Ufomia Re Vl2033346 REJMAX Estate Propertla. 1321 11656 l96d 1 Garage S/24/2012 S 420,000 http;//www,CalifomiaReV1203510S ShwewllOdRealton.,ltK. 3488 2007 8/10(2012 $ 1.129.000 hllp://www.redfin.conv'CA/Palos-Verdl!$-Esta1es/2ll4-l'alos-verdti·Dr·W·9Dl74/unit·2/home/8127747 1208 11250 197" 2 Garagl!' 8/17/2012 $ 390,IXXl hltp:/fwww.CRISNetMl.Sf12036984 PafJOl'e.,R.eclty,lrn;. 1600 20653 1981 2 Garag!!' 3/7/2013 $ S48,000 htlp://-w.cal!fotnlaR&PV130078S3RE/MAXEstatePropert!es 1147 21239 1973 2 ~.age 3/8/2013 S 490,000 http://www.CallfomiaRtV12098067 Prudent1a!Caldornl.:1Reatt.y 671 20653 1981 2 G<M"age 7/27/2012 S 238,l'm hllp:/fwww.C.alilomialleS11114S06 RejMaicExecsRPV 1140 10713 196:; l Gatil(lt ll/lS/2012 S 406,000 htlp:/J-.Ulifomi1JteS12083S66 ScottAiiastasiReah.y 15 1059 20653 1981 2 G.:traae 12/14/1012 $ 350.000 http://www.Ulltomi.:tRtP8lS676 &o.ardw.alkPrope:rt~ 2 1705 11464 1979 2 Garage 12/7/2012 S 500,000 http://www UlffomlaReSll091927 RE/MAXbtatePropertiff 4 2770 200i 11/20/2Dl2 S 1,600.000 http-Jfwww.redfln.col!V'CA/P.llos-Verdes-Estates/250IS-Via-Campesma-90274/unll·2/home/2l9240ll 4.2S 5576 15884 2012 3 Garage G/8/2012 $ 2,799.000 http://www.~omi:1Revtl034997 PtninsulaSotheby'slnt'IRtl} ... 4 25 25 ' 4 4.25 ... 25 ,_, 25 L75 2 25 1.75 ' S5 45 3.75 . 2.75 2.75 '-"' 25 2.7S 4.2!> 2.S 1.75 5 2.5 2 4 2.S ' .. 1-75 1.25 35 1.7S 2.75 2 '·' ' "' 2.75 "' ''" 2188 4750 "" ""' 3293 """ "" 3520 .... 5158 2405 2394 3024 ""' 2436 , ... "" 1760 "" 2028 """ """ 4613 4527 "'" -4560 SS32 2126 2845 ''" 3034 2301 4115 23'4 1477 4425 ,.., "" 2"" .... 2074 2419 ., ... 1962 6000 3410 4035 3377 1940 1816 5064 29ll ""' 4350 '"' 3532 19171 195.!> 3 Garace U/30/2012 $ 2,725,000 http://www. California Re S12US111 Shorewood Realtws JNC "'" 9460 .13077 15210 21559 43~1 U5"l ... , GS19 9<06 60SO 22452 7080 1"''' 10322 16732 19250 1'899 8380 "" 1122'3 117?5 "'"' 13847 5571 9511 8766 8121 '""' 15947 6"70 1142& 12491 15762 U0.29 11B% 7142 9844 9013 9076 10123 15127 12020 125S7 15149 1982 3 Gar;1«e 3/13/2013 $ 2.SS0,000 'ntlp:/fwww. Caftfornla Re Vl.1032491 PenlMLlla Sot'neby's Inti Rily 1959 2 Gar.ice 10/10/2012 $ 1.2fi5.000 http://www.CallfomlaReS12100117 TIHiRealEstateGroup l9SS. 1952 1956 1981 1978 1m "" 197' "'° 19'7 19Sl "'"' 2009 '''" "" 1952 19S8 1974 2000 "" 1976 1978 1976 19~5 19~4 1974 198 19~7 19U> ""' 19'!> l9S3 ,, .. 19W 19~7 19£1 ,,,, 193-1 ,,,. """ 1953 2008 19.$4 1'*-5 2006 ,,., 19$0 1952 1%5 1940 19'2 "" 19~7 """ 1%0 19~-8 1955 2 Gaf.ag.., 3/1/2013 $ 2,.499,000 http!//www.CllllfomlaReVU0701S1 ~lnsule5odwth•blnt'tRlty 2 G-'tr~ 6/8/2012 $ 1,22.S.OOO http://www.CalifotnlaReVU029577 Pl'!llinsulaSotheby'slnt'tRlty 2 Ga ace 2/6/2013 S 1,600,000 hnp:J/www. California 11.e SSUlS2406 Shorewood Realtors INC 2 Gafatl• 3/l/20H s 2,225,<XD hf.tp:/fw-. California Re PV130018S1 RE/MAX Estate PropenJes 3 GMqe 3/20/WU $ 2,260,000 http://www. Callfomla Ile 512041786 Shorewood Realtors INC l Garage 2/2S/201.3 $ 2,375,000 ht!p://www.CallfotmaRe'l/11071040 RE/MAXEstatePropertlU 3 Garase 2nanou $ 1.926,075 http://www.eallfom1aR1S813018739 Re/MaxbecsRltdondoBcla(h 3 Glr;ge S/24/2012 $ 3,975,000 http!//www.CalifomlaReV12029480 ~lnsul:1Sot'neby'slnt'IRhy 3 Gar>13e 5/15/2012 S 2,951,000 http://,,,_. Yllfornla R• V1201'4060 RE/MAX Est.ate Properties 2 G.arage 4/17/2.013 S i.no.ooo http://www. Otlifomi• Rt PV1302100 Peninsula Sotheby's inti lllty 4/15/2013 S t.,.U0,000 hup://wwW.rttfin.cotl'\/CA/Palos-Verdes-EstatK/1617-0ahon-fld-90274/home/7n4191 2 G.race 4/19/2013 S 1.665,000 http://www. Ullfomla Re V12U4499 Coldwell BankeJ"-PV/adi. Cities 2 GM.age 4/22/"2013 S 2.215.000 http:Jjwww. Californl.a Re PV1.l041448 PenlnsulaSothehv's lnt'I Rlty 1 Gar.age d/24/2013 $ 1.275,000 ht.tp://www.Califom111RePV130317SlCOldwell8anket-PV/8ch.Crtie5 2 Garage 12/28/2012 S 2.000,000 http://www.CallforniaRe:Sl.2068444 PeninsulaSoth•bv'51n11Rlty 2 Gar;1ge 6Garag• 2 Garqe '°""' 1/7/2013 $ aso.ooo hup://www.Callfom~ReS81214028S Tht!RealEs1ateGro1.1p 1/9/2013 $ 914,000 http://www. Callfoml:1Re 5812134149 South Bay Srol.ell., Int 3/12/2013 $ 2.550,COO http://www. CallfornlaR• J'\/'13003820 RE/MAX Eslilte Propenle!. 4/9/2013 $ 1,360.000 htt~://www. UUfomlaRe PV13026853 RE/MAX Utate PropertlH 2 Garage 9/7/2012 $ 1.4SS,000 httP:/twww.callfornlaReV12032823 COldw~IBankerP.VJSouthBay 2 G.arageo 6/19/2012 S l03S.000 http://www. CaUfornla R• 512051488 Shorewood RHlton INC 2 Garage 6/15/2012 S 1..US,000 http;//www. California Re V11110958 Shorewood Reak<m, lht. 6/15/2012 S l6SO,.OOO http://www.redfln.am1/CA/Palos-Verdes·btat11J/30U.V13-Rh/ere-90274/homeof17J6107 ~Garage ~2012 S 2,325,000 http;//www.Californi.:tReV1203114S PenimulaSotheby'slnt'JRlty 2 Garage 7/Hl/2012 $ 2,395,000 http://www. Clllfomla Re 1/12056409 P.E/MAX Estate Prop.rtlilS ~ Garqe 8/9/2012 $ 1.500.000 hltp://www.ClllfomlaRefl734S9l Coldwell8anker8e:achskMI 2 Gareceo 8/13/2012 $ 1,200,000 hnp://www. Clllfornla Re 512000010 Prudential c.alifomla Realty 3 Gar..geo 8/21/2012 $ 2,288.000 http://www.CaltfornlaRe512048045 ShorewoodRealtor5INC 3 Gllfage 8/30/2012 S 1,860.000 http://www. California Re Vl2071676 The RealEstate Group 3 Gar;iige 8/31/2012 $ 2,100,000 hllp;//www.CalllomtaRe'/1203fi007 .,_lnsulaSotheby'slnl'IRlty <I Garate 9/14/1012 S 1,803,000 htlp://www. Callfomia Re \112096001 R£/MAX Eslate Propertle:s. 2 G..-.ag• 9/18/2012 S 1.sas,000 hup://www ~llforniafle\112066984 KelletWllllamsPal°'i!VelMs 2 GM"a&• 2 Garac• , ...... 5 Garaie 9/19/2012 $ 1,380,000 http://www. Califonilii Re \112001593 Keller WN!iams. Palos Verdes 10/17/2012 $ 1,4!5,000 http:/}WNW. Clilfomia Re V12110056 RE/MAX Estate Pn>pertles 10/15/2012 $ 1,075.000 http://www.Califomb.ReVl2112571 Coldwell8anker-PV/8ch.C!Ues 10/17(2012 S 1.390.000 http://www.CalifomiaRe512U6342 Solllh8ay8robn,lnc 2 G.:trage 11/20/2012 S 2.650.000 h1tp:f,__catlfom1tRe5121182<12 Sh~oodRe.altorstNC 1 Garate 1}7/2tl13 S 1,275.000 hr.tp://www.CallfornlaRePVU147023R.E/MAXE.stlttePtopertles 2 Gan&e 1/14/2013 S 995,000 http://www.CallfomlaRcPV12135mWAulty 3 G.:1111&e 1/14/2013 S 1,~7S,OOO httpJ/www. California Re VU082416 COidwell SM.ker·PV/Sdl. Ck~ z Gar.ap ,.,,.,. 3/6/2013 S 1.160,000 http://www.CalifomiafleS8130015S3 Re/MatEuGSolrthBay 3/6/2013 S %0.000 http;J/www.c.liforniaRe5813009221 GoldenWestfl.ealty 2 Ganige 3/7/2013 $ 2.1.50,000 lntp;//www. CaJ;foml11 Re PV1300S056 PeninsulaSotheby's lnt'J Riiy 2 Garag1 3/lS/2013 S 1.7SO,OOO hr.tp://www.CalifomlJIRePV13010009fl.E/MAXEslate:PropertiG 3Gilrage 4/3/2013 S 1,900,000 htlp://www. Callfomi_. Re 58l303S«M Shorewood Realtor.; INC 2 Garage 7/17/2012 S 815,000 http://www. CaUfomta Re 512041418 Eiat Really Experu. 8/24/2012 S 1.250,0CO http://www.redfin.cotl'\/CA/P:.Aos-Verde:s·Estates/2105-Vla-Femandet·90274/home/1n6M7 S/29/2012 S 1.250.000 hUp://WWW.rl!dfin.com/CA/Palos·Verdes-EstatH/2004-Via-Vi»IU-90274/hafTll!/7126437 a Garage 9/H/1012 S 870,000 ht!p:/Jwww-California Re \112002168 hn1ns41b Properties 3 Gi!•a,e 10/19/2012 S 6,500,000 ht!p://www. C;ilifomiaRI! 5812131758 Shorewood Realtor5 INC 2 Gar.:11e 10/13/2012 S 985,000 http://www.Califoml;iReVU06697S ColdweUSankerP.VJSoulh&;iy 1. G.ar;ice 2/28/2013 $ 1,030,000 http-.//www.CallfOllllaRePV1213fi747 RE/MAXEslatePropartlt!s 2 Gara,e 3/4/2013 S 1,730.000 http://www.CallforrnaRePVl.3003288 RE/MAXU1ateProp..rlie$ 3 Garage 3/2'/2tll.3 S 1.970.000 http://www. California Re S813020618 South Say Brokers, Inc 2 Gar-ee 1/4/2013 S 1.015,000 htlp://www.CallfomiaRe55121282ll Slwlh9ay8rokell.,lnt l Garage 3/14/2013. $ 2.19S,OOO hnp://www. C.:dlfomi• Re PV1300S470 RE/MAX Estate Properties 2 Garag. 3/4/2013 S 869,000 ht.1p;//www. California Re P\ll.JQlOSU RE,/MAX E.stale: Propenles 2 Gar~e 3/27/2013 $ 1.675,000 htlp://www. CalllomlaJl:e P\113036237 Coldw~l 8anket·PV/8ch. Cities 2 Garaee 7/17/2012. S 850,000 htlp://www.CallformaRRCU068717 EVERGREENREALTY 2 Garage 9/13/2012 $ 815,000 http;J/www.Cahfom~ReS12071148 TheRe;iilEslateGrotlp 2 Garage S/31/2012 $ 955,000 http://www.Califom~ReS1109fil20 Slc.ylini!Rt;dtyGn;.vp 4 Garage 6125/2012 $ 3,225.000 hltp://www.Cal;forrna.ReV120533S8 PenfnsulaSo1heby'~1nt'IRlty 2 Gar11&e 6/29/2012 $ l,425.000 http://www. California Rt VU035747 RE/MAX Estat:e Pmpenles 2 Gar;iee 6/29/2'012 S 1,945,000 hnp://-w.Callft>mi.aReV120516&2 ColdwellBankerP.VJSoutl1Bay 2 Gar11ge 8/18/2012 S 2,050,000 hnp://www.CallfornlaReVU034681 PenlnsubSo1hebv'sl11t'IRlty 2 Gan1g" 8/7.l/2012 $ l.565.000 hnp://-w. caJJf<11n1;i1Re Vll061763 llockyfie:ld 26:.rage 5/8/2012 $ l,742.SOO http://www. C.alilornla Ae Vll0989S2 Coidwell IW>kcr·PV/8ch. Cities C - 3 2 Pat Sale Smale FamllyResldenlial Pas1»le-SlnclefamilyResidenlW Past.»!. SinglafamilyRtiident1al PanSale SinglefamilyResident1al PmtSale SinglefamilyResidenlial PastSale SlnglafamUyRestdentlal PastSala SlngleFamllyResidential Past Sale Slngle family Rnldent1al PastSale SlncleFamil~Residential Past~ SlnglefamilyAesidential PMt»le SingltfamilyResidentlal ~Sal.-.Smglefam1lyResidermal P;1$tSa!e SingleFam~Resident1al PastSale Singlefamd~Reudential PastSaleSinglefarnilyResidential Pas1Sale SmglefamilyResidential PastSale SihgleFemilyResidentilll PastSale S!ngleFamllyResidential PastSale-SingleFamllyResold!!ntial PastSaleSingleFamiJvResldentlal Pasts.le Sinr;leFamilyReslderuial PanSale 5inglef;untlyResidenual Pan5ale SingleFamilyResldentlal PastSala Sln&lef.arnilyllesldenti<ll PauSale SlncleFamHyResidenti.al Pansale sinclefarmtyflesldentibl P.stsale SincleF~Residenlliil PztSaleSingll!FamilyRe~ Pil$l5ah SinglefamllyResidenlial P.-t S. S!ngle Family R11Stdtntn1i PMisale stndefamilyR~ial P.astSale s.ng!.F.am!JyResilhtmal PastSale SinglefamllyResoklential PastSale SlnglefamllyResldential Past Sale Single F.amlly Raidential Past~Slflglef.amilyResidentlal Pasts.ale SlngleFamilyResidenlill Pasl~SinclefamityResldential PastSale SJ•fMTillyAUidential PastSak! .5in&JefamilyResd•nt1al PxcSate Slnclef.amitylte51dential Pastsale SingkifamllvRtsidentlal Past~ SlnglefamtfyResklenllal Pasts.ak SingleFamllyRa-ldenlial Past~ St1111leFamilyllesidentlal PastSale SinclefamilyRe5idenUal PastSak SinglefamilyResidentlal PastSale SUlgieFMnllyResldential PastSale S!ngleF.amitioRntdent1al PastSale SinglefamilyRnident1al PastSa/e Singlef.amllyResldenti.-1 PastSale SlnglefamllyAesldential P11!$tSale Slnglef.amllyResideritlal Past~SlnglefamilyResideritial Past5ale SlrigleFamllyReskmtllal Pas.l~SiriglefamlfvReskiflltlal PaSISale Singlefamltvl\es.idential PastSaif: S1ngk-F1milyResio:kntial Pasts.le SinglcefamllyR1!$idential Pa:stSale Slngk-FamllyReslderitial Pas!Sale SlngleFamilylle$ldent1al PastSale Sln&1e:FamilyResldential PastSaJe. SlnglefamdyResidenli.-1 Pasts.t. SingieFamdvResidentlal Pas.tSale S!ngleFamityResidential Pans.le SinglefamilyResidential Pastsale Sin&lefamilyResldent1al P.aJtS.leSinglefamifyRestde~ P~Sale Sit>defarnilyRt$1dential PJ1StSaleSingflof;thlllyR1!!.ldentlai PastSafe SinglefamilyRnldent~ PztSafe SingtefamilyResidential P;sstsaht SinglefamilyResoldent1al J>astS.tie SingleFamilyResklential Pas1.5ale StngkiF.amilyReslden11al PastSale SinglefamitvRfl-Jdenhal PastSale SingleFamlf\IAesldent1al Pa:n Sale Single family Rukietrt!al Past Sale Single Famlly Resoidenual Pa:stSale Singlefam1lyRt!Slden!lal Pasts.ale SinglefamilyRl!Sidi!ntial PastSale Singlehm!J'yResidential Past Sak Single hmily Residi!ntial .U33VIALA5ELVA 3909VJA50LANO 4021Vf.iSol~ 3125PAlOSVERDESOr 3120Vtata~Na 4036 VIA lARGAVJSTA 348VIAALMAR 606 CAll.1 OE ARSOl.ES l512VIACASTIUA 160! VIA BARCElONA 2727VJAMIGUEL 561 VIA DEL MONTE 15l2VIAMONTEMAR 1515VIAl.AZO 4028 VIA VALMONTE 1633VlaArnba 4132 VIA PICAPOSTE 605VIADUMONTE 705VIAOElMONT£ 27911 G0l0£N MEADOW Or 1600 VIA FERMANOU 1637VIAZURITA 15.32GJ1nvlaAJtamlr<1 1024Vl.aNog.t!es. 326 CALLE OE AR&Ol.ES 4000 VIA VALMONTE. 4028 VIA lARGAVISTA 2S32VIAANITA 25S2VW.Anita 4185Vt.a.5ol.ano 204VIANAVAIO n&Q.OVOENRd l6410iELSEARd l416VIAAMADOR 708 AVENIOA MIROlA 16.28 PASEO OEL MAR 109'/ARMOVTHRd l9130.altonRd 17410ttibe.aRd 2425 Wesl PALOS VERDES Of 2316 PASEO DEL MAR 2108THOf!.L£YRd 937VIARINCON 2717 VIA CAMPESINA. 4232 VIA ALONORA 2304 VIA LA l:IREA 513 \llA GORIUON 2524 VIA PINAU: 3 YEUOW BR!Ck Rd 2732 VIA ANITA 2S«lVIAlA5ELVA 2308 VIA tA BREA 2009 VIA SE.GUN DA l029PASEODEL50L 24863 vi;. v.tmon1e 2108 PASCO OU MAR 917VtaOe1Mante 2500 Palos. Verdes Dr W 2872 VIA Of lA GUEllAA Ul12PALOSVERD£50rWest 2020 VIA PACHECO 4120\llaPkaposle 2700VIAVICTOf\IA l.700VIA PACHECO 924 VIA RINCON 400PASEODELMAR 1612ChebeaRd 2800vtASEGOVIA .1748AddbonRd 2357 VIA A""'CAPA 1524\liaMattil'll!l 16210allonRd 44"tUCERACif .1641VIAl.AZO 4016VIANJVEl 205JVIAvtSAl.IA 373 PAI.OS VERDES Or 1.025 VIA NOGAlE~ 549 PASEOUJNAOO 1620 ESPINOSA 01 1149ADOISONRd 2557 VIA SANOIEZ Palos Ve1de5 btate~ PalosVerde$Utates PalosVerd<!Sbtates PalosVerQes.Esta1e5 Pakn Vl!'rdn bt<lte5 PalosVerdesfsl~es P.tlmV~Estates P.ilo5Verdes£sl:atn Redondo Beach PalosVe<desEstatH P01losVe~&.1ates P.ilos\letdesEstates PalO!IVetdesESt.ates P.alQJVtrdonEstates PalosVerdes£$t<lt1!$ ralosVe1desEsUte5 Pala!. Verdes.Estates Pal0$ Verdes Esutu PalO!i.Verd4n.btatH Palo$\lerdel&utH R~Paki$Verdff Palos Verdes Estates PalosVerdeslstatn PalosVerdftbtaiei POllo:sVerde5Esl.tti!! Redondo BeKh PalosVerde5bt:.ttes PalosVenle!ilsiates P.alosVerdesEstates Palo$Vude$Es1a1es Palos Verdes Estates Palos Verde!!. Estates PalosVeulesEstatu Palos Verdes Estates Palm.Vel'desEstates P;ilm.Verde:!.Estates PalosVerdesfstales PalosV~fstates POllOSVerdtiEstates P.tlo$Ven:tes.Estaies Palos Verdes Estates Palos Yucks Estates Palos Verde:!. Estates PalosV~rdesEs1ates PalosVerdesbtales P.llosVeidaEstates P•IO$VenfesUt.ai.es Poal0$.VudHbtates Po;ilm.VerdesEst<ttes RanthoPOl!osVerdff Pal0$Ve1de$Estates P.1losVe1dftEstatn P;ilosVe1de!.fst<11.es P.1losVMdesEstates P;ilosVardes.Estal.11$ Tom1:nee PalosVerdesEstaies Palo$Verdes.Estllles P.tlosV1ttdes.lstates Palo5VerdesEstates PalosVerdesEslaes POl!osVe<des.EstalH PalosVerdesohlales PalosVerdtiE.states P.alosVerdesEstates Palos Verdes Estates Palm.Verde:s£states P~VerdesEst.aies PalasVl!tde$&1ates Palm.Verdes£.s1atl!! PalosVe1dt:5Estatn PalD$Ve1de!,£:;1atfl PalosVetdfl-Estates PalosVerdesEst~es PillosVerdftEstates PalosVardesfslatH P.alo!.Ve1dtiEsta1es P<1losVerrle$£slales Pal1nVert!es.Utatl!S P.ilo$VerdesEstates P.alm.VerdesEstiltes P.alosVet~Estittes P<iolosVertle$kslatn CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA ca CA CA CA 90274 1539000 815000 90274 995000 90274 90214 852500 90274 90274 12lSOOO 90214 1349000 90277 1495000 90274 2l491XX> 90274 2995000 90Z74 l2980CO 90274 1395000 90274 1009000 90274 1489000 90274 """ 9027' 90274 2399000 90274 2S95000 90275 """"' 90214 2299000 90274 1149000 90274 90274 90277 1390000 90274 1025000 90274 U69000 90274 1599000 90274 90'274 90274 1059000 90274 2800000 90274 1095000 90274 U95000 90274 31.SOOOO 90274 90274 90274 90274 1549000 90274 3798000 90274 2995000 90274 4499000 90274 1499000 90274 1049000 90274 1395000 90274 90274 1195000 50275 2259000 90274 1149995 90274 1565000 9027• 1395000 90274 1649000 90274 3200'.XlCl """' 90274 2399000 90274 90274 90274 919000 9027" 1049000 90274 ""274 90274 2500000 90274 139900(J 90274 3999900 90274 4200000 90274 90274 2975000 90274 90274 90274 90274 1798000 90274 2350000 90274 969000 2750000 "'"""" 1475000 90274 972000 90274 1049000 90274 1399000 90274 1199000 1.75 L7S 2.25 2.75 3.5 ,,, 2.S s ' 3.25 25 •5 2.25 ,., 25 35 4 3.25 1.75 2.75 3.25 L7S 3 1.75 5.25 15 3.S L7S 5 3.25 2 4.25 rn 1.75 2 25 1101 1780 1419 1553 1698 lB<l9 2429 .3310 4191 4360 2524 ''"" 1941 4145 3169 1816 5679 1994 1731 1110 3251 '"" -2431 2761 1813 1966 4000 1861 4'83 3186 2772 3261 ""' 5300 2614 251' "14 5000 2453 1«>1 2230 3597 4166 20<1 2250 1917 1617 1612 1537 5930 ,.., 4700 •100 """ 4652 2462 1717 48()7 2484 ..... "" "'" 1702 ""' ,,.. "" 62'0 '"' "" "" 5977 150>7 >.5066 16579 10102 "'° 8212 9656 7978 12811 11416 10900 6051 9341 8907 ""' 98'6 '-"'' 12898 1lli6 16471 ,.,, 22617 16090 16SOO 16121 6910 9'91 15"/77 6429 7145 "'" ..... 12978 17736 7'85 8519 11761 49413 1251' 2'6<l "'" 17330 7819 21089 "" 11138 10116 ""' ""' "" 1952 1950 1952 1952 1952 1962 -1978 1971 1992 1956 1953 1952 l959 193' .,., ,,., 195• l967 1957 "" "" ,, .. 1953 1951 195~ 2011 "" "" 1999 1975 1971 1996 19'1 ""' 1955 1960 1951 1967 ,.,, ""' 1959 1955 1963 10% 1965 195' 1956 1956 1962 196' "" ""' 196<. "" 1952 1001 ,.,, 197' 1975 19:z!. 195S 1955 1973 2 GM3se 2 Gar~e 2 Gange 2G.arage ]Garage 2G<tr.:ige- 2 Gilfag!' l GM.age 3 G;irage s Garage 2 Garage 2Garage 2 G.ariljjt> 2 Garaae 2 Garage 3 ...... ,.., ... l Garage 2Garage 2G<trage 20...., 2 G.tr;iie 2 GM.ae;e , ...... 2 ...... ,.., ... ,.., ... 2Garav l ...... 2 Gatage 2 Gar.age 4 Garage , ...... 3Garaae 2 G;u-q_e 2G;irage 2 G;onge 2Gilrage 2Gataae 5Garqe 2 G•rqe 2Gar;qie 2 Gu.age 2Garag1!' ]~rage 2 Garap 2 Garage 2"-• 5 Garage 3 G;irage 2 Garage lGaragli! 2 Garago. 3 Garagt> 2 Garql!' ,.., ... ,.., .... , ...... 3 G<11;qt- ll G<11age- 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 G::m111e :ZGara,e 2G>nil• 5/11/2012 s 5/1112012 s 6/13/2012 $ 6/11/2012 $ 6/15/2012 s 6/20/2012 s G/28/2012 $ 7/6/2012 $ 7/10/2012 s 6/29/2012 s 7/31/2012 $ 7/12/2012 s 5/8/2012 s 5/18/2012 s 6/20/2D12 s 6/29/2012 s 7/31/2012 $ 8/7/'lfJ'U s 8/17/2012 s 8/21/2012 s S/10/20U S G/22/2012 $ 3/14/2013 s 3/1/2013 s 3/4/2013 $ 4/15/2013 s 7/21/2012 $ 7/'U/20U $ 9/S/2D'U s 9/13/2012 s 9(20/2012 s 4/lS/2013 s 6/28/2012 s 7/18/2012 s 8/a/2012 s 8{1/2012 s 8/24/20U s 9/S/lOU s 9/S/20U $ 9/19/2012 s 10/3/2012 s fl/16/2012 s 9(1B/2012' 5/31/2012 $ 6/4/2012 s 6/6{20U $ 6/8/2012 s 10/3112012 s 11n12012 s 12/12/2012 s 12/1&/2012 $ 12/19/2012 $ 12/14/2012 s 12/28/201.2 s 12/31/2012. s 12/21/2012 $ 1/23/2013 s 1/:B/2013 $ 1/2S/2013 s 1/3112013 $ 2/1/2013 s l/6/2013 s 2/7/2013 s 2/20/2013 s 1/2l/201l s 2/22/2013 5 215/2013 s 2/15/2013 s 2/20/2013 s 2/27/2013 s 3/22/2013 s 3/2.6/'1013 s 4/4/2013 s 4/25/2013 s lt/25/2013 $ 4/30/20U $ -· 1/20/2.m.2 $ 7/27/2012 s 5/10/20125 5/22/2012. s 5/3112012 S S/31/2012 s l.<125.000 htlp:/lwww California Re V12006474 Prudential Cilliforn~ Realty 829.000 hllp://www. Callfomia Re \112002991 RE/MAX E.stale Propeitia 944,000 http://w-. California Re VJ.20JS672 Prudan1utl Cahfomi:il Reeltv 1,300,000 ht1p;//-w.rlldfitl.tom/CA}Pal1&-Verdes·Est11t~402l·V1a-Solano-90274/home/7722164 7&8.000 httt4/www. Cclllfomla P.e 569372$ Coldwell Banker bce-llenee 302.500 http:/ /www.redfin.com/CA/PllOS·Vtnles·Efl•es/3720-Vla-t.~lva-90274/homt/7722.2.41 1..22S.OOO hup://WNW. CahfonO Re Vl2060773 Pen!nsula Soth!'byl. lnt1 Alty 1.314,000 http://www. C.llfomla Rt V12060221 RE/MAX Estate Prope-rtles 1.475,000 h1t1>:/Jwww. California Rt VU023803 RE/MAX Estate Properties 2.115.000 http;//www. Callfornl• l\e Vl1099763 Penln$ula S01heby's lnt1 Rlty 2.800.000 ht1p://www. CellfomlaRe VU0514S3 Coldwell Sankar P.V./Soulh B.y U00.000 http;//www. California Re \111142915 RE/MAX Estate Propeitit-s 1.405,000 ~://-w.C.llfornial\eV120224l2 KellelWilllamsPalosVantes 995,000 http://www California R.a V1201D331 Tia l\.alEJ.t.at• Group l,"89.000 h1tp://www.callfomlaRtS12057777 RldliltdLPeier.ion,Brok~r l,049,000 hnp;J/www. California Re Vl.2061006 Panlnsul• Sotheby'" ln11 Rlty 2,850,000 htlp:/fw-.redflri.com/C>./Palos..Verdel·Estates/1633-Vla-Arrfua.90l74/home/77238SO 1,000.000 http;/ Jw-. c.utomla Re Vl2073505 c.oldw..U B~ker P. v JSoulh Say 2.300.000 http://www.califomlaReV1207•545 RE/MAXEstateProperties 2,450,000 htlp://W-.. l'..allfomiil Re S120S4226 Sh~ Realtor.; INC 860.000 http://www.CaUfoml•ReS6937•7 1Ce11ttwnu.nu.Realty 2,050,000 http'.//www. CaJlfomla Re 511119995 Shorewood Re-allon INC 1.100.000 http://-.. Clllfomia Rt PVl3021362 RE/MAX Estate Properties 200.000 http://wwwJedfln.r.om/CA/Pal05-Vertfes.Estates/W2-~All..nlr;i.90274/home/77l7033 880,000 http://ww#.ndftn.com/CA/Pa401rVerd6-Estates/l02+Vt1-Nogales·9027"/horne/1726707 1.342,.500 http:/fwww. callfornla Re PV13026081 hnlosula Sotheby'sJnt't Rltv 931.000 hUp;/jwww. Californta Re Sll0899a9 Coldwell Banker Resldfhtial 1,269,000 hup://www. California Re VUOIJS691 Peninsula :sotheby'i lnt'I Rlty 1.S!l9.000 ht1p;//www.callft>ml.tRtVl.204088a PeninwlaSotheby'slnt'IRlty 757,000 hllp://www.redf111..cornfCA}Palos-Venles.Estatr.;/25S2-VJa.Anit•90l74/home/7723346 l,52&,000 http:/{W#WJMfin.corrVCA/Palos·Vtn:les.hmes/418!.-VJ..Salar.o-90274/hofl'lfl/7722447 l,130,000 http://www. Callfom1i1 fl.e S&130410ll4 P.tm ReOll!y Boutique 1,00S.000 http-J/www. Callfornl• P.e 512005170 Shorewood Reel!OD 2,800,000 http://wwW. c.llfoml• Re VJ.2095938 PenlnsulaSotheby') 1n11 Rhy t,150,000 hllp://www. Calltol'!ll• Re VU<l820Sl Coldwell Banke1-PV/8ch. Otles 1.138.500 http';//www. Callfoml.I Re SU0699SS Prudential C.tlifomla Rulty 3.180.000 hup:.;/www. cat!fornlil Re V12076363 Pitnlnsula SothebYs Int'! Rhy 975.000 http://www. C.lffomla Re 511047880 Re/Mn Exeo Redondo Be.Id! 975.000 http:J/-JedfJrt.com/CA/PalO!.·Verdes-Estl4es/l'JU.Dalton-ftd.!l0.27•/home/n24687 t.399.000 http://---Jedfin.com/CA/Plli,,,..Vefdfl.Estates/174l·Chebu-Rd·90274/horne/7724116 1,.450.000 http://www. Cillfomla Re V12068624 Coldwell 8anke1·PV/lkh. Olles 3.541,000 http://www. C.llfoml• Re V1208S529 RE/MAX Estate Pl'Opeitles l,800,000 http://www. callfomla Re S11095Ia2 Peninsula Sotheby's Intl Rily 4,100,000 hltp://www. CelifomiaRe 511046026 ShG1TNood RHll:ois INC 1..550,000 http://www. Cilllfomia Re Sl.2051329 C-21 Amber Realty 1))37.000 http:/fw-. Cthfomla R• Vt20538'.94 RE/MAX Estate Propenles l.403.000 http://wwW. California Re \112044747 RE/MAX Estilte Pro~nles 1,125,890 hltp://www. Callfomle R• S12.1007'09 Keller W~lia<n$ P.ealty 1.220.000 http://www. Ohfomi• Re Vl211&927 R£/MAX £slate Propertifl 2,235.700 h1tp://www.Cllifom1aReVl21~5 RE/MAXEstatorPtvperties l,125.000 http://www.CallfonmlRePVl2130886Prud~tlalCallfomlaRully 1.565.000 hnp;//w-. California Ra PV121Sll45 hnimllla Sotheby') 1n1~ Alty 1.,390.000 http://www.CattfomiaP.eSl.2031126 KellerandAssodalesRealtv t.404.529 http://www. callfomia Re PVlll.34310 Coldwell Blnkf'r P.V./South Say 3.200,000 http;//WW'IO. Calltomiafl.e 5813000329 Day & MsodM.H 750,000 http:/Jwww.redln.C'Om/CA/Tortan(~/24863-Vla-V~l•9fJSDS/horrie/7720879 2.255.000 http://www. California Re P\11.2144304 Penlns\lla Sotbeby'51nl'i ltlty 650.000 http://wWW.redflt1.tom/o./f>alt:Y.s-l/enfes.Estates/917-Vi1t-OeJ.Montt-90274/home/'ti26729 t.140,000 htlp://www.redfln.com/CA/Pliilt;&.Vtrdes-Estates/lSOO-Paloi-Vertfes.Of·W·902.14/hcmle-/7725875 940.000 http://"1WW. C8Dfomla Re PVUl.3&536 Penlnsula:Sotheby'l lnl'I Rltv 1))15.000 htlp:f/www. Calif~ Re 581300256l ke/Mac Exea Redondo 8l!ach 2,025.000 http://www. Cilifomla Rt S8ll148S4S Palr'l'I Really SOUt~a 975.000 http://www.redtin.c.om/~Vf'l'de:s·Estat~4UO.Vill·~le-902~4/htxM/7722420 2.260.000 hUp:/{www. Ulifomia Re VUl.13094 RE/MAX Estale Propenieso 1,400,000 hup://www. callforn11 Re 5813004488 Prudential California Rultv 3.825.000 htlp://-. Qdtfomi• f" SlUS0423 Shorewood ftelllo.s INC 3,100.000 http://www. California Re PV1JOOOS86 RE/MAX £mite Propeitles 1.500.000 http://www.redfin.c.om/CA/Pal~Vtrdt!s-Estilles/1612·Chebfa.Rd-90274/htJrn./7724l99 Z.750.000 ht!p://www. Ollfoml• Re PV121S1199 (.all Raahy 1,236.SOO http://www.redflrt.cani/CA/Palos-VerdH-Estates/1748·Addbon·Rd·90214/homef7724272 1.250,000 http:/{www. C.alifomla Ra PV1.l034777 RE/MAX Est.ale Properties 2.670.000 hnp://WWw.redfln.tom/CA/Palos-Vert:les-Estate!/l.524·\lla-M~itlnez·90274/homenn4408 1,.350,000 hnp:l/w-redtln.tom/CA/P~Vertles-£s1A1as/1621·Dallon-R.d-90274/home/1724192 t..785,000 http;//www. Callfom!a Re PVl.3020915 Coldwell Banker·PV/lkh. Cltle:s 2,325.000 http://www. Californla A• Vl212235S RE/MAX &tMe Properties .995.000 http://www Callforrua Rt PVJ.3060912 ftt>ller Williln'l5 Palos Va1chis Z.632.500 http:J/www. California Re P\113009236 Penin!ul.a Solheby'$ lnt'I Rlt't 2.265,750 http-./fwww. C.ltlomla Re 51204235$ Reel Utate E8roker inc. 1,.415.000 hf.tp://www. California Re V.12079145 Pv Broker• Inc 972,000 hltp:f/www. CallforruaRe \111157171 Coldwtll B1111ker·PV/lkh. Cities. t.010.ooa hnp:J/www. Ciillltoml• Re \111119240 Caldwell Banker P.V,/Svu1h ~ 1,450.000 http://www. C:tbfomta Re V120St430 Peninsula Sot.heby'l lnl1 Rhy t,191..000 ht!p:J/w-. California Re \112025449 RE/MAX E$1ate Propeit~ C - 3 3 PastS.iole SingleFamilyResldent1~ 19080ALTONRd P"lmverde!i Eslates CA 90274 1195000 . ' 2{)70 "" 19S4 2 Ga1""<18• 6/11J2012 $ 1,199,000 http;//www Catifotnl• Re V12031941 RE/MA>t Estate Proptirtles Pastsale SingleF.lmilyResidentl.iol 2808 PASEO DEL MAR Pill~ Ve1dtt Esllll.es CA 9027-4 S695000 5 '·" 7528 2<la8• 200! 3 G~•te 6/13/2012 $ S,225.000 hnp://www. ~lifomia Re V12018247 Penlnsul.a Sotheby'$ lnt'I Rtty PaslSale SingleFilmitv'fhmdelltlal 3022 VIA BORICA Pal0$Vt11d~Est;ite CA 90274 1685000 5 ' "'' 2""" 1'£• 3 G;ar.oge 8/10/2012 s 1,500,(XX! http:/Jwww. CNifomia Re Vl208122& Call Reillty PastSale Stn&krFilmtlvRnldenlliil 1012 VIA ROMERO Palos Verdes Estates CA 90274 1100000 ' 1.75 2111 8067 19'3 2Giir:;ige 10/31/2012 s 1,022.(XX} hr.1p;//www. U~forniaReVU087600 PrudentllllCalifotnlilRully PastSalt SlngleFiimllyResklenhil! 23330/ElSEARd Pi!l0$Verde$ Estate~ CA 90274 1695000 4 rn 211' 11369 1%2 2 Garilgl! tO/U/2012 $ 1,695,000 http://www.Calllomh1ReV121llil3 CowReatty'Co. Past5ile SingleFemdyResldential 2863 VIA v1crORIA P.i~Verde!>Es1.11:es CA 90274 ZCl'J9(X)(J 5 4.5 ""' ""' ,.., 3 Garage 11/7/2012 s l,S00,000 htlp".//www. California Re Vl20S4357 Penht5111ASotheby'$ ln11 Rhy PastSile SingleFemllyResldentlal 1733 DALTON Rd Pilk!5V11desE5laes CA 90274 1449000 4 3 2514 '"' 1971 2Gill'age 11/9/2012 s 1.350.<m http://www. Calffom!.11 Re Vl20610~ hnlnsubSotheby'i. int'I Rhy P.m Sale Smgle Family Resldent1.:W 145 ROO:V POINT Rd PaloiVerdesEstates CA gcn74 530000'.l 5 s.s 517& 18417 2002 '"""' 11/14/2012 $ S.000.000 http://W*W. Callfomlll Re Vllll9364 PenlnsulaSotheby's lnt1 Rlty PntSa!. SmgleFam1lyResldentlal 1133 VIA ZUMAYA PaltKVerdtiEslilleS CA 90274 1499000 ' 35 ,..., US43 1979 '~ 11/16/2012 $ 1,400,000 http://www. Ulifomia Re Sll116UIS Shomvood Realto~ INC Pntsale SmgleFamtlvRnident1al l136CHELSEARd Palo5.Vetdesbtilles CA 9027-4 1595000 ' 25 2001 ""' 1957 2.W>t< U/12/2012 s 1.SSl.000 http;/Jw-. Cabfomta Re PV1213131611.E/MAX Utatot Propertll!S PoatSai. SingleFamllyResidenti~ 3005 VIA fUVERA Palo;sVerde!ibtatff CA 9027-4 1399000 4 4 "'° .... 19i2 8 Gar;tg• 12/14/2011 s l,179.000 http://www. California Re .5&12139620 Re/Max. £xtcs south Bav PoatSal1 SinglaFalllllyReident1al 90!IVIAMlROlA PakisVwdeEstate5 CA 90274 109900J . 2.25 ""' 56110 1956 2GM ... 12/7/2012 $ l,085.000 hltp:/fwww. Cahfom1;i Rot V12087!124 Coldwell Banker P.V./South Bir{ P~t s.~ Single F;imdy Residenual 9:J9 PASEO LA CRESTA PalPSVetdeshtilles CA 90274 2800000 5 4 4642 27264 "'" 3 Garap 12/19/20U $ 2,750,000 ht!p://WWN. Callfom1a llt PV1213&223 RE/MAX Estm:e Pro~rtlfl. PftlSal• SinglotfarnilyR.mldtm1al 283:J PALOS VERDES Dr West PalosVerdeEstatn CA 90274 1099000 ' L75 23111 8691 1%3 2 Gar.it• 12/21/2012 5 1.050,000 ht!p:J fwww. C.lifotnia Re Vl2104049 Shorewood Realr.ou, Inc. PaM sale Single Family Resldemlal 2012 VIA PACHECO Pal1nV11rdvs&t:1t11tS CA 90274 1488000 . 35 ""1 10321 1916 2 Garage 12121no12 s 1,425,000 ht1p://www. callfomla Re 5812126541 RE/MAX fstllte Pro~rtles Pastsafe. SinflleFamllyReskk!ntl<ll 4321 VIA AZALEA P;ilosVerdeft[stiltes CA 90274 1099000 4 2.5 2580 14778 ""' 2 Garilf!i: 6J8/Wll $ l,090,000 tmp':./fwww. C.llfomla lie VU158788 RE/MAX Estate Properties fa$t$ale SlngleFamilyRes~nlial 3906 VIA VAi.MONTE PalosVerdesEstiles CA 90274 899500 ' L75 1317 "'" 19~3 2 Garage tt/21/2012 $ 865,100 http://www. Calitornl11 Re 512114976 Keller Wlllb/1'1$ Reellv P.etSillil SlngleFamilyResldential 3205 PaltK Verdes DIN Pal0$Ve1~Estates CA 90274 2 2 1605 19~2 U/6/2012 $ 830,000 http';//WWW.l'edftn.torn/CA/Pa!os·Vetd11$-bt.atts/3'20S-Pilk>:s·'Vll~·Df·N-90274/horne/1n'J!J10 PastSale SingleF,,.milyResKMntlal 14SlVIACOflONEL Palos Verde.Estates CA 90274 1750000 4 25 "" 15756 ""' 3 Gar11&1 11/:W/2012 s 1,735,000 'nttp:/fwww C31ifamiilReV12119271 RE/MAlCEstatePtopertift PastS..le SlngleF"milyResidenllal 1305VIAZUMAYA PalMVe1dlsEst~n CA 90274 l2SOOOO • '·" 31'16 "" 1976 lGarage 11/30/2012 $ 1.175,000 ht1p:J/vtww. Callfoml.a Re Vl.2096644 RE/MA)t Estae Properties PoatSaleSincll!familyRes~lal 1448ViaCorono!I PMosVerdesEsutes CA 90274 4 ' 5013 19;a ll/U/2012 $ 1,700,000 http:JJ-.rldfin.u;m/CA/P-alos-V•rdls·Estates/14-C&-Vll-Coronel-90274/home/7726296 Pas1Sale Sing~F~lyflesidem1al 524ViaAlmar P.alosVttdesEstates CA 90274 3 ' 2740 "" 11/28/2012 $ 1.640.500 http://www.redfin.t:onv'CA/Palos·Vettfeos.-UhittrS/S24-Vi•Almar·90274/home/7723775 PastSale Slngte>Fam»itResldentlal 2633 VIA VAi.DU Palos Verdes Estates CA 90274 1290000 4 ' 3001 6707 :!Gar11ge tl/29/2012 $ 1,200,000 http://-. Cllllfom111 Re Hl203fi0SS Home~ Realty P.astSale SlngleFami+yRaldl!nt1al 2825VIALA5ElVA P.ikisVe1deEsLltes CA 90274 3499000 5 7 ""' 15408 2003 3Gar11111 6/1/20U $ 3,317,211 http;J/www. Ciilifotnla R• 'V1204812S PllllMUb.Sotbtby's lnt'l lllty PastS:ale-SlncieF~Residenual 4309VIANIVEL PalotVeidel.Utai:a CA 90274 740000 3 1.75 1531 8468 ''" 26'u ... 12/S/20U $ 7116,000 ht1rd/www. Callfotni.\Re PVill305.47 ColdwtllBanker P.VJSmith a.iv PntSale SlngleFamltvResidential 2H12PASEOO£LMAA. Palo$Ve1de$Estates CA 90274 4700000 ' 7.75 7188 2078S 2005 3Garage 9/19/2012 $ 4,700,000 bnp;//www. Calif°""" Re SBUl31123 Sla~ood Realtors INC PanSale Slnt~FamifyResidentibl 416 AVENIOA MIROLA P11losVe«teEstates CA 90274 1449000 ' 2.5 2445 47'5 19>6 ;. 6¥:;1£1! 9(14/201"2 s 1,3"10,S87 http:/Jwww. U!;lomia Re S.11134970 Keller WUliilms Realty PastSale Sin&lcfarnilyResldential 2047\!IA\ltSALIA PaM. Vecide Esbtes CA 90274 2795000 ' 4.75 "'' ""'" 20U 3""-9/14/20U s 2,.ns.000 http;/J-. Callfomla Re Vll082448 PenlnsulaSotheby'i. lnt1 Rlty Pa$lSale SiftllefamilyResidentilll 2740VIACAMPESINA P~Ve1desbtates. CA 90274 1750000 3 2.S '''" 10810 19~ 2 Gau111 S/lS/2012 $ 1,650,000 http:/Jwww. CalifornJ,;i Rot V110171'>45 Co1dwell Sanker-PV/Bdl. Cities P~!Sille Sintk!F11m1lyResidenti;ol 933VIARINCON PalosVerdm.&tates CA 90274 1n5000 4 ' '"" 12380 1~1 2 GMagl 5/31/"J012 s t.6115,000 http;//-. Callforrna Re Vlll39496 C.01dweU Bank.er·PV/8di. CllleS P.11$ts.ale Townhotise 2124 West PALOS VERDES Dr Palo5Ve1de!Estiltl!$ CA 90274 1129000 3 ,,,, 3311 5000 2002 3Gar•te 8/10/2012 $ 1.129,000 http;//www. a.hfurnia Rt \'12Q91.S44 RE/MAX Esliite Properties Pasts.aie Townhouse 2334 West PALOS VERDES Or #2 Palw.Ve1deEstiltfi CA 90274 """"' 2 2.5 1250 lUSO 29;4 2 Gar!!§t lYJ:.7£2012 $ 450 000 http;//www. California Re 512090904 Keller Williams BHdi Citift MEDIAN ""' "" $ 1,403,000 C - 3 4 ~~ PastSa!e Condo/Coop Past s..le Condo/Coop PastSille Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Pas.tSale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past~ Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past salt Condo/Coop Put Sale Condo/Coop Past S;ile Condo/Coop Pas1Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop P1S1 sale Condo/Coop Past S..le Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Pas1 Sale Condo/Coop PastSale Condo/Coop PastSale Condo/Coop P~tSale CDndo/Coop Pasts.le Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop p~ Sat. Condo/Coop P.ast Sale Condo/Coop Past 5ale Condo/Coop Past S..le Condo/Coop Past S;ile Condo/Coop P;at Siole Ccindo/Coop PastSale (.QndoJCoop Past.sale Condo/Coop Part Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past s..le Condo/Coop Past salt Condo/Coop P;1$1: ~ Condo/Coop Past S;iJe Condo/Coop Pllfts.fe Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop PAt salt Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop P~t S;ile Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Oxsp PMt Sale Condo/Coop Po:t$l Sale CsJndo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Cnop Past~ Conda/Coop PMt Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale OJndo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Pa5t Sale Condo/Coop Pan Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past salt Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Salt Condo/Coop Past S;ile Condo/Coop Pi1$t S;ile Comk1/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale CDndo/Vx>p Past salt Condo/Coop P.a.i.t Sal.t Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop P .. ts.ie Condo/Coop PastSale Condo/Coop Pa5t sale Condo/Coop P11$l 5ale Condo/Coop Pat sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Pasts.le Condo/Coop Poist Sale Condo/Coop Pi'GI sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Coop P.istSale Condo/Coop Past Sale Condo/Uiop P.astsale Condo/Coop Pi1$tSale Condo/Coop Smglef;imilyRes.identl;il ADDRESS Q!! llm. 6542 OCE.f R;incho Pafoi Verdes CA 28121 HIG Rancho Palo$ Verdes CA 5700 RAVE Randw Pal.n Vetd~ CA. 29600 lSl.4 Rancho Palos Verdes CA 5100 RAVE Rancho P1Jos Verda. CA 3200 LA R< ftancho Pclos Verdes CA 2%41 Sov Rancho hlos Verdes CA 29641 Sou· Rand>o hlos Verdes CA 2%41ScxrRanthoPalo$VetOes CA 28639Vost R;indloPalos\lerdti CA 29600 lSl> Rancho Palos Verdes CA U13S CAOC Randie Palos Verdes CA 28513 VIS1 R.llntho P•l<n Verda CA 5630AAV! Ran tho Palcos Verdes CA 65420CEJ"RanchoPalosVerdes. CA 29600 ISv. Rancho Palos Verdes. CA 32700 COJ R;indio P•lo$ Verdes CA lOOTerran Randio P;ilos Verdes CA 32759 SEA Rancho Palos Verdes CA 32646COJlR;iochoP;ilosVerdes CA 6526ocr.tRanchoP;it0Verde CA 3273S5[ARanchoPalosVerdes CA S917MM.RanchoP;ilosVerdes 32646CWRarithoPafo:sVerdes LOO Terr;in Rancho P.!o$ Verclti CA 3200 lA Rl Rancho Palo$ Verdes CA 3200 LI Re Rancho Palos Verda CA 3200 lA Rl Rancho Palcos Verdlls CA 3200 La Re Reh Palos Vrd CA 3200 lA Rl br!cho Palv.. Verdes CA S700 RAV( Raocho Pait» Verde$ CA 2%41 Sov bncho P~ Verdes CA 5937AflM.AatichoPalv..Verdes CA 29641 Sou Rancho Palos Verdes CA 29641 Sou hncho Pal0$ Verdes CA 28619FRllRanr.hoPaloJVerdes CA Undisdose san Pedro CA 1&52STOl\SanPech"o CA 65420CE.lllanthoPalosVerO..,. CA 6542 oa:,1i Rancho Palos-Verdon. CA 65260CE.l!RanchoPalosVerde. CA 6S42 Ocea llaneho Palos Verdt,. CA l96001Sl.J1 Rancho Pak>$ Ve1des CA 328S9 se111 Rancho Palos v~ CA ll679.sEA Rancho Palos Verdes. 29641 sou R...icho Palos VtrdH 29641 SW Rancho Palos Verdes CA 32709.sEA Rudio Palm Verdes CA 1712BYERRotndloPalo1Verde$ CA 5987 PEA< Rancho Palos Verdel CA 5937ARM.RanchoPalosVercfel 5917 ARM. fWKho P.alos Ver~ 59f.i5PEACRanthoPalosVerde.. 59S9PEACRanchoP~Verdes 5630 ltAVE Rancho PaJ05 Verdes 1815 CAO( Rancho Palos Verdes CA 3200 lA Rl Rancho Palos Verdti CA 3200 lA R( R;incho Palos Verd~ CA 30959\li<i RanchoPalosVerda CA 17070ldslRanthoPalosVerdts CA 29600 ISi.A R~tho Palm Verdti 326~SEA RandloPalosVenie. 6S4lOCURanchoPal05V«des 53Hdllop•Jl.anchoPalosVerdes S959 PEAC Rarn;ho P~ Ve1des CA 28130 RKll, R3ntho Pal°" V11rd9$ CA 5937 AAM. Rancho Palos Verde!> CA 5941 ARM. Rancho Pal06 Verde$ CA 3200 la Re Rancho P~ V111.W.. 5718RAVERanc:twPalosVerdes 28S24 VISl Pa~ Verda PenlnSula CA 28S40VISlR.anchoPalosVeules CA SGS8 RAV£ Ranch(I Palos Verdes CA 5937 ARM. Rancho Palos Verdes 5987 PEAC bnchoPalos\lerdfl S9UPEACRanchoPal05Verde> 14508rel15anPedro 1432SRETSanPedro CA uao STOii San Pedro CA 6542 OCE.I! Rancho Palos Verde CA 14SOSRET San Pedro CA 2912 Vl5TI bnchoPal05 Verdes CA ZIP~~ 90275 43500'.l 90275 33800) 9017S 37000Cl 9027S 530000 90275 399000 90275 642800 90275 280000 90275 286000 90275 234900 90275 90275 S490CO 90275 299000 90275 90275 429000 9027S 257000 902'5 "45000 459000 90275 90275 464300 90275 406900 90275 39SOOO 90275 648800 90275 ~7000 90275 498000 "'"' 90275 629000 9027S 90275 775000 90275 90275 660000 90275 403500 :rasooo 90275 90275 270000 90275 2SSOOO 90275 39XlOO 90732 209000 90732 344000 90275 324900 90275 259000 90275 278800 90275 90275 459000 90275 525000 90275 282500 90275 585000 90275 334900 90275 473900 90275 379000 90275 349900 90275 485000 90275 S20000 90275 339000 90275 368000 90275 545000 90275 ...... 90275 90275 90275 460000 90275 440000 90275 90275 269000 90275 90275 419900 90275 330000 90275 90215 379000 9027S 409900 90275 349900 90275 345000 90275 3S5000 90275 569500 90732 339000 :icms iooooo 90175 l!Allfi ~ rn ~PARKING~~JM_T_SAl.E.OATE ~ ~SOURC£ ~ ~ 1358 1973 2 Gat1Re 3,'18/2013 $ ~.000 hnp:/tw-.nC.llfom1allulE§t<lleV12125324 REJMAXEstarePrope1lie!o 1187 1574 2 G;iragP 9/10/10]2 5 328,SOO hnp:l/www.r•C;illforni;iRe1IEs1atel2-S09583 lt&lle1&As-soc.RealtyofPV U13 36702 1964 2 Gana1e 10/11/2012 S :MW,000 h11p://-.r>UltfomioaRnlbtilteV1211278& RE/MAXhtatePropert~ 1553 37234 1974 2 G"'qe 10/26/2012 $ 510,000 http:/lwww.r• Ulifomla Re;il htate S1210C042 Keller Williams Beach Ol1es L15 1213 36702 1964 2 Gar;igf 4/22/2013 S 395,CXXl http://www.r-Callfoml;i Real Estate SB1J029945 Pnnkntial California Re;ilt'! 2 1373 242003 1974 2 Gan1gP 4/18/2013 S 630.000 http://www.r· CalJfomla Real Estlltt PV13004036 RE/MAX Estate Properties 1.75 U07 1965 2 G;irag~ 10/)1/2012 S 27S,OOO http://www.r• talifornla Real htatt 12·62542l Doke & As~tes 2.25 17SO n471 1965 2 Gilfage 11/14}20U S 386,000 http://-.ro CallfomtaRealEstateV12104380 RE/MAXEstatePropertim; L15 L75 2 1.5 1.1S 1.5 1.75 2 L75 2 1.S 2 ,, L75 2 ,, 2 L75 1.75 2.5 2 2.2s 1.75 L75 2 L75 ~2S 2.2S 25 2 L75 1207 i2477 1%5 2 Gar<le:r 1L'10/2{112 S 240,000 http://www.ncallfornlaftealESlateV120946S6 Rl/MAXEst.tePropenies 1565 1975 n.'?8/2012 S 125,000 http://www.rtdfin.com/CA/Rancho·Palos-lltrdtt/28635-Vis.t>Mader~9027S/uA11·99/home/1729812 1447 37234 1974 2 Ga1age 3/20/2013 S 5SO,OOO http://www.ro Caltforma Real ht.rt PV13002180 RE/MAX Estate Prop11nles 1103 127114 1979 2 G~1,,ge 7,'22/2012 S 310,000 hup://www.r· Califom1a Real Estate V12023532 RE/MAX Esutt Propenias 1436 1974 2 Gar<1ge 1112/2012 S 396,00l http://www.ro C;ilifDmlaReal Estate S121041S8 Brian Horan 1715 EQO 1%2 2 Garag• 7/19/2012 S 415,000 htt.p:J/wwwroC.lifomleR•alhtateV12041662 CokiwellB1nker-PV/Ekh.Cities 152' lS6S 14:>3 1736 '240 1506 1071 1565 2470 1373 1527 1527 1373 ,..., l21l 1207 1071 1207 mo 1305 IDS 1068 3n.34 7S3134 753134 167188 753134 215365 753134 242003 242003 72477 n477 >4852 167015 167188 778 1G7188 1068 1396 "" 1565 1455 1565 1071 1071 mo 1165 "" "" 1527 3610 '"' 1396 "'" 1358 .... 1'94 "" l 5'285 21536S 23620 127114 242003 2426 37234 3184 "'"' ""' 1011 215365 215365 ""' ,,... 1455 U9 1146 1071 215:>65 2100 52285 1296 U19 249561 1068 1671118 65Sl liillll "" l%4 2008 1964 "" 1973 1964 ""' "" "" 1974 1974 1!>74 1974 1965 1%9 l96S 1965 1974 ,,., 1976 1573 1973 1'13 1973 1574 1S64 "" ,,.. '965 1964 1974 1974 1.961) "" 1973 1'62 1979 1974 1974 1974 1,.. 1973 ""' "'" 1976 1969 1969 1974 "" 1974 1974 1965 1974 1986 "" "" ""' 2 Gaaae 8.'Jt/2012 S 224,500 hup://www.1·c.llfomlaRealbtateVUOISSS61 R£/MAXEstatef'rope:nie!. 2 Garag~ 10/9/2012 S 446.000 http://www.ro Cal!fornia ltul [5tal:e Vl2Cl327"3 RE/MAX Estate Praperties 2 Gatil(l.e 12.'U/2012 S 450,000 trttp:/jllNIW.r.C.Ufomr.RealbtateS12095364 Sh01"8Wi)Q(!Rffhors 2 G.atage 2 Gar;ige 2 G1Agl! 2 Garage 1 Garage 2 Garage 2 G....ge 4Gaiqe 2 Garage 2 Garqe 2 G;ira1:e 2 G;irage 2 GMage 2 G;irqe 2 Garace 2 Garage 2Gar.age l G;irage l Garagl! l Gar~ge 2 G;irair:e 2 Garage 2 l GiJl';tgt 2Gar• 2Garagt 2 GMl!ie 2 GMage 2 Garage 2 Garap !Garage 1 Garage 2 Ga•"ltl!' 2 G;ir;ige 2 Garillt 2 G...-age 2 G;ir~t 1 GaraJ:e 2 Ga1aJe 2 G;ir3£P :.1 G;irag" 2 Gilla&P 2Gal';lflP 2 G;irage 2 GM.age 2 Garage 2 Gar,;oie 1 Garage 1 Ga1~e 2 Gill'~e l Garage l G;irage l/9/2013 S. 1.495,000 http://www.redfln.com/CA/R~Palos-\/erdts/100-Terranea.Way-90275/unl1·28·101/h~/21918845 2.'20/lOH $ 464,3&1 http://www.r. CallfornlaRe;il bl.ale PV12137607 RE/MAX Estate Pr~les 2/26/2013 S 410,000 htlp://www.roc.lifoml;iRea1Estat:eS12124772 Rt/Ma>:becsRtdondoBeach 3,'14/2013 $ 350,000 hltp:/JWNW n c.lifomiaRe.i Es~l' Vlll.c.3761 Prudential CaUforni;i Realty 3/29/2013 $ ~.ooo http://www.r> Callfoml• Real ht ate PV13000836 Keller Willl&mS Pal05 Verdes lllS/2013 S 402,000 http://www.ro Callfomla Rut E!.t;ne S813030344 Prudential Cllllfom1a Realty 4,'12/2013 5 490.000 http://www.ro Callfoml1 Rut Estat• SB1300s.c67 Re/Mu Exec;; Redondo Beech US/2013 5 2,000,ooo http:J/www.tedfln.com/CA/Rancho-P1los-Verd8$/lOO-Terran111·Wl'f-90l7S/un11-19-201/home/28916S47 2/22/2013 S 620,000 http://www.ro Cilllfomle Real Estate PV1300060& RE/MU £state Propertll!::!o 3/21/2013 S 695,000 http://-.redfm.com/CA/Rancho.P;Jtos-Verdes/3200-La-Rotonda-Or-9027S/uni1-214/MmeJ1738-43S 3/29/2013 S 750,000 hn.p:l/www.roc.tifomiaRulEstateS!U:t0017~ Shorr#oodREALTORS .i/2/2013 S 718,000 httrr.//-.r.dfin.cDm/CA/Rr:h-Palos·Vrd/3200-ta-Rotonda-Dr-90275/unlt-216/hame/7738433 12/11/2012 S 620,000 http://-.r< Californl'1 R&.al Estate Slll00624 Di Bernardo Realty 1/24/2013 $ 380,000 hnp:/fwww.s>Califonwoflealbtate.Sll1214468.3 Ho~TeamRe;ilty 10,'10/2012 5 278,000 http://WWW.r•ClllfomiaRu1Est&teS12076'UO Rir:kAc:halz 5/3/2012 5 334,900 http:/f-.r.Califomialh1aJEstateS683976 FlrstTeamRe.alEstate 1/25/2013 $ 270,000 http://wWW.ro C.Ufoml1J\t1I Bl.ate 5812137766 Shorewood REALTORS 1}4/2013 S 245,000 hnp://-.r>Callfomta.RealfsltJ,tSD12l39736 PenlnsulaRHlty,lnc. ·1/8/2011 $ 35SJl00 http:JJwww.r. callfotnll> Rut Est;ite PS:l9342 Grow Real Estate 5.'2l/201J S 109,000 tmp://www.nC.ltfomiaRl'•lhtattl2·585259 TotaniRealty 8/9/20U S 362,000 hnp-J/-.n Callfornte Real Estate P827US Coldwell Banker Beac!Wde 6/14/2012 $ 325,000 http;//,,,_.,, tallforna. R..al Estate 512013105 Robbte M1ll5 6/18/2012 S 253,000 hnp:J/www.1>Cilfffttrn1aReelfstattl2·595135 SlmonSoomekh 6/29/2012 $ 268,000 http://-.r. California Real Es111u V12032638 R£/MAX Estate Propl'rt~ 6/28/2012 S 372.000 http:./}www.'9dfin.«itn/CA/Rlndio·Plfos·Verdes/6S42·0c.,n-Crest·0!'·90275/UNt·El206/Jiornef1746187 8/10/2012 S 430,000 hnp:J/-.t>c.llforn1aRl'alEsta1eSU029784 Sho.-oodRea!ton 6/11./20U S 600.00l hnp://www.~n.cam/CA/Rancho-Palos·Verdes/32859-se;icatt·Df·9027S/unlt·206/homt[1740779 7/17/2012 S SlS,000 http://-.r·CallfQl'nlaRulEstate51l073460 SalbiRealtylnc. 6/7.0/20U S 270,00l http://.__,. C31ifomla Real htate Vt2048778 R.E/MAX Estate Properliei 8/16/2012 $ 226..500 ht1p:/lwww.~.com/CA/Ratleho-Palos.Vetdes/2!.l64l-S-Westem.Ave-9027S/unlt--416/home/80909S6 8/22/2012 $ S40,CXXl hnp;//www.ro Callfonua Real Estate VU07453S B;wn11tt & Co., Realtors 7.'13/2012 S ~.000 http://--r< Cabforroa Real hi ate SU065921 Re/Max Elle.a RPV 5,'18/2012 S 455,(Q) http:/fwww.ro c..lifornla Real Estate P813575 CoJdwell 8aflker COast AUlance 6/13/2012 S :>69,000 hnp://www.1. C.Ufo1nia Real ht ate Vl2018S1! P.E/MAX Estate rropertles 6,'21/2012 $ ~2,500 http://www.r> OUfomla Re;il Estate V111396S6 RE/MAX Estate Properties 7,'lo/2012 5 458.000 http://-.ro Ultfomia Real Estalt V11129342 RE/MAX Est.II:• Properlkos 8/t7/2012 S 495,000 http://www.r>CallforniaRe.albt.at.tVUOl0032 DwlonRe:ilEstattSerYicts 8/24/2012 S 339,000 http://www.fl C.Ufoml<I Real Estat• SU080841 Prudential C.llfornl.a RWly G,'20/2012 S 355,000 http://www.ri C.llifomia Real. Estate PS2115l Coldwell Sinker Coas1 Alliance 6/22/2012 $ 529,000 http:/lwww.fl Callfomi;i Real btate VU0475n Dilgnw Hoebich, ball.or 8/23/2012 $ 699,000 http://www.r< Clllfomia Real Estate Vll096046 RE/MAX Estate Properties 4,'22/2013 S. 1.410,000 http://www.redf!n.com/CNfleocho-Patos·V8ldes/30059-Vla-l.a-Cresta-90275/home/77.S0384 4,'18/2013 S 220,000 http://www.redfin.com/CA/Randio-Palos.·Verdes/1707-0ldsto,....Q-90275/unft·12/home/7685491 3/18/2013 S 529,500 http://www.ro Cllltfomla Real Esta!.e 13.-648103 Sll1u~ Matten Ri!!alty 7/20/2012 S 455,900 http://www ... California Rnl £stat~ V11029164 IC~ WiUlams Pelol Vitrdn 2/12/2013 S 440,000 htlp://www.r• California Rl!al Estate 512120869 Kelter Wiit~ Reodt:y 2/22/2013 S 390,000 hflp;//www.r-.dfln.com/CA/Rancho-Palos-Verdes/53·Hilltop.Or·90275/home/7750941 3/\S/20H S 4/10/2013 s 4{26/2011 $ 4,'30/lOB S 7/24/201'2 s 7;24/2012 5 10,'31/2-012 s 10.'ID/1012 s 11/5/2012 s 1118/2012 s 1217/2012 s 12/21/2012 $ 10/22/2012 s 5,'J0/2012 S 5/1.9/2012 S Gl4/20U $ 10,'19/2012 s 12,'11/2012 s 265,000 ht1p;//www ... Califonua llHI £~ate PV12l.3281! l.,gry M11nacernent 517.000 ht!p:/lwww.rfHffin.comfCAJRanthc-P~IO!i·Vtrdet/28130-Ridgepoint·0·9021S/11nit·91/horne/174911S 370.000 hup://www.J> Cidif0tl'KI! 11.eal Est.ltll 5813008728 leo Nordine REALTORS 337,000 http://www.r• Califorrua Re&! Estate PV13040199 Coldwell Banker-PV/Bch. Ot~ 695,000 http://www.redfln.com/CA/R1KKho-P;il<.>S·Vl:«le$/3200-La-Rotonda-Or·9017S/umt·21S/horne[7138434 370,000 http://www." U.Ufomlli fl.e•I Esiatv V12003512 RE/MAX Es1;it.e Propert~ 409,900 http;//~.r· Callfomta Real Estate Cl.2086619 DtL8ECK RE REAL LIVING 390,000 Mtp://www.r> Celifomlll Real £state P820SS!.l ReM;11t Tiffany Rul Estate 345.000 http:J/www.ro c.allfoNU Real Est.tie V12016602 Coldwell Banb!r P.11./Soulh Bay 367,SOO hnp:J/www.r• C.Jffor~ Re;il Estatl' V12119S2' Coldwell Banker P.V./SOulh e.;iy 555,000 hup-.}/www.r. CaftfDmla Real ht ate 22165513 Keller W11llltm5 Realty Sl2,000 hltp://www.J> California Re"1 Est;it11 Sl.2098180 HolfHI Tum.Realtv 250,000 htlp:j/www.redfin.a.tn/CA/San·Pedro/1450-Bretl·Pl-90732/unll-3rYiJ/home/7G8608:9 283,93!"> hnp://www.t· California Real Estate 512026212 Camino Rutty 236,900 httrr.Jfwww,r> Callfomia Real Esratt P81!i672 Shandrow Group 372.000 http://www.r> tahfomla Real E.statl! \/12022610 RE/MAX Estate Properties 200.000 hltp://www.r· Califomi.1 Real hliltt YU04240 Excellence Real Est.ale Ser~ke 3,325.000 http:/t-.r. Callfom1a Re;il Estate V120S8585 RE/MAX Estate Propenles C - 3 5 P..st$ale SinPFamllyResldentlal Pai;t.5.lle Singlef1m11lyResident!M P25tSale SlnglefamilyResidf:nt1al PastSal• Singk:FamdyRestd<infod PztSale SlnglefamllyResldential PastSale SingleFamilyResldentJal PastSale SinglefamllyResldential PastSale SinglefamilyResldentlal Pa!.t$al<i SlnglefamdyResidentlal P.ntSale SlnclefamdyResidenUal Pasts.ale SingleFamilyR~dentlal Past Sale Sinslt! Family ResidenUal PastS..le SingleFamilyResldent1al Past Sale Smak! Fmnly Rnidenti.i Pasts.le SlnglefamllyResidentlal Past5.11e SlngkfamilyResidentlal Past5.11e SinsleFamilyResidential Pastsale 5mgtt!FamllyResklential P..st~ SloglefamilyRcsldenlial Past~ SlnglefamilyResidenl:l.ll P;utsale Stn&lefamllyResidential Pasts.le Sing}eFamilyResidentl91 Pasts.I• stnsleFamlfyReskMrrtlal PastSakt Sln&lefamifvResldent1al PastSale 51nglehmilyResldentlal P.as.tsaJe SlnglefilmllyResldential Pastsale Sln&liehmllyResidentlal Past.Saki Singk-FarnllyResldem:lal P,a5lSale Singlefarnilyflesidenllal P,a5lSale SingjeFamilyResldenUal Pil!stSale SingleFarnilyResldential Pi11t5ale SlngleFanutvResidentlal P<IStSale SingleFamllyRes;identlal Pan Sale Single Family R.sld~nW1I PastS.ale Si"4lef.ernilyliesident1ai Past Sale Sin,k farnlly R.slckmtlal PastSale Sin&lef""1ilyResidentlal PastSale SincJeFam1lyResidenuai Pastsale SingleFamllyRtsidential PastSalti SingleFamdvRes~ntial Pasisale SlngleFamllyR1!$1den!lal P.astSale Sll'f£leFatn!lyR1!$1d<intlal Past5.ale Sl1>1lefamilyReldentiill PastSele Slf!$1eF .. milyResldential PmtS..le Singh!f~milyR1!$identlal Past5ale SlngleFamllyResldflltial Pans.le S111&k!familyR1!$1den1ial Pas-tSale SingleFamilyResidemral Pats.It SinglehmilyR11SKlent1al PastS;ile SingleFamilyR1!$idential P;atSale Slngk:f;imil~Reidential PaslSate Sl~famltvResklenl:Jal PastSale SingleFamllyResidenlial PastS:.le SlngleFamllyResldentlal PastSa.le SinaleFamllyRuidential Pa5t~le SinglehmllyAe5kl!!nllal Pat Sal• S.ngle Famdy R11!$tderrtial PastSale 5mclefam1lyR1!$iclentlal Pat.I Sale Singh F•mlly R1!$ide~ Pzt S.1le Sin&fe Family R1!$1dential PastSale SineleFamilyR!!Sidenlial Pa:st5ale StnglefamilyRl!Sldenl:ial PastSale Slngl<!FamilyResklentlal Pasts.ale 5mglefamllyResldent1al Past-Sale SinglefamilyResidenlial P25tSalto Sin&leFarnilyRe<dential P015tS.ile SinglefamilyResidfllt1al Pas-1.sai. SingleF.amdy~idem1al Pa1t5.liki SingiefamilyRcstdenUal P.astSale Slnglefam!lyReslck!nti;al PastSale SinglefamilyR<lSidflntiill P~t Sale Single Family Residenti~ P..stS.ale S!ngiehmilyR11Sldentral P.ntS.ile SincleF;imil.,Residenti.t Pas-t5ale SinglefamrlyResidenUal P.astSale 5mgief¥n•lyR1!$id<lntial Pa$t Sale Singk Famdy Residential Pasts..le SlnglefamilyRl!Sldl!nllal P.ltltsale Singlef~lyResidenu.il P<IStSale Singh!FamifyResidenlial PastSale SmslefamilyResidenu;il P~t Solle Slntlehmily R~~tral P.ast5ale 5inglefamilyResidenlial U~Cll.O\RanchoPalosVeidei 2022 AVEti Randw Palos Ver~ CA 71 ROOON R~hg P.alos Verdes CA 2090AVEfl Rancho Palos Voir~ CA 2103 CAOI Rancho pa1tg Verdes CA 2532 COU Randw Pal~ Vei~ CA 2934CRO\ RanchoPal05 Verdes CA 6-1/2 MUS Rantbo Pal05 Verdes CA 27959 PAL RandKI Pal1JS Verde!. CA 28065 PAl RMicho Palos Verdes CA 22M£lAL RanchoPal05Verdes CA 295ANTA RandioPalosVerdes CA 30l50PAL Rancho Palos Verde CA 642$ Vh\t Rantho P.alos Venles CA 99 VANDEi Rancho Palen Verdes CA 32214 Vak Rancho Palos Verde:!. CA 3439 CORI Rancho Palm. Verdes 3303 PALO R.1ndio PalO!o Verdes 28104Lot.AandtoPalosVerdes l7811 HA\i Rancho Palos Verdes CA 27112ME!Rantht1PalosVerdes CA 3lllOMJ\IRanthoPalosV.,dti 27SAILVJIRanchoP.11o$Verdes. 1V~~CRanthoPalosVerdelo CA 5918 OCEI Rancho Palos Verdes CA 26 COVE VI Rancho Palos Verdes CA 7318BERRRanchoPalo5.Verdes CA 41 SAIL VII Rancho Palm Verdes CA 68QA88( Rarn:hoPak),.Verde$ CA 6527 SAN[. Rancho P.alos Verdes CA 4 FIGTREE R~ho Palos Verdes CA 28904SCO Rancho Palm Verdes 286l.5 CO\r Rancho Palos Vlll!Ms 2875000...llandlOPalosVe«fes 28'3100\ Rancho Pakr.i Verdes 281ZS.TRAll¥ldioPalosVerde$ 2839 Bron. Rambo Pakis Yeides CA l870llEA-RanchoPakisVerde CA 30058 AVE Raocho Palos Verde$ CA 30955 VIA Rantho Palm. Verde. CA 2862.4CO\oR"lnthoPal~v ... des CA 65PAS£01 R1111choPalos Verdes CA 6418 VIAS Ramho P.alos Verdes CA 6923 HIOD< Rancho P.alos Verdes CA 2776YIST/Ra~hoPalo$Verdes CA 2959 CftES Rancho Pak>s V1;1tdfi CA l COACH Rancho PalO!o Verdes 30523P;iltRchPalosYtd 2033VantRanchoPalO!>Voirdes CA 1936 CADt Rancho Palos Vet de!. CA l.967TRut~ P.ilosVerdel. 2810G MO Randlo Palos Verdes 2431SPARk.anthoPalosVerdes 6421VIACRanchoP.alosVerdM 2l.390or4-RanchoPalosVerdfl. CA 28800 PAL Ran tho Palos Ver"des CA 2913lSou RanchoPal1JSVerdes CA l8Sl REDC Rilncho Palen Verde!; CA l8S8 TRUC Rancho Pil/os Vet' des CA 6968 Al.TA RanchoPaloio Vardes CA 2852000\ RilmhoPalos Verdes CA 30924 MAI Rilncho P.alos Verde!. CA lOOOOAVE 11.andlOPalOll Vetdes CA 6635 OCU RltllCho P.alos Verdes CA 28822 ROl Randlo Palos Verdes CA 6047 OCE.t lla(tt;ho Pm Verdes CA 60230CEIRam:hoPalosVt1td~ 676lELRCRanchoPal1;15Var~ 29015WAI RandioP~ Ver~ Uodlsdose R;i.m;ho P;i.So~ Verde!. 28811 LEA Rancho Pal'" Verde! CA 26611 co~ R;i.ndw Pi;los Vt1rde5 CA G7D7ALTAltanchoPalosVerde CA 6412 otAF Rancho Palos Verdes CA 28242 LOB Rancho P;ilos Verdes CA 28729 ROl Rilndio Palm. Verde CA 2S70GORIR.anchoP.al0Verdes CA 28733 CO\ Rancho Palos Veides CA 6SS8ALTARanchoPalosVer~ CA 28410 LOI\ Rancho Palos Verdes CA 30365 VIA Rilnd'to Palos Verd~ CA 30840VIA RanchoPalosVerdl!5 CA 29204 GOL llancho Palos v~ CA 90275 1459000 785000 90215 90275 899000 90275 689000 90275 8900'.X) 90215 10950CO 90215 8899(X) 90275 974900 90275 799900 90275 ll45000 90275 1609000 90275 2999000 90275 650000 90275 lE'B9000 ''"'' 90275 975000 90275 21:95000 90275 82CXXlO 90275 90275 1795000 90275 2199000 90275 90275 2599000 90275 1525000 90275 1175000 90215 2179000 90275 ll&lOOO 90275 UOOOOJ 9027S 13SOOOD 90275 1090000 90275 1199000 90215 980000 90275 1099000 '°"' ''"'' 90275 lO!:J9CXX> 90215 l395KXX) 90275 1450000 9027S %8000 90275 )9S0000 90275 1599000 90275 879000 90275 899000 90215 lOSOOOO 90275 1088000 som 90275 90275 649000 90275 475000 90275 69!>000 90275 929000 90275 899000 9027S 90275 849000 •om "'°"" 90275 649900 90275 51.9000 90275 2350000 90275 """"' 90275 1500000 90275 11>59000 90275 939000 90275 817000 90275 1525000 90275 178DCOO 90275 1190000 90275 900000 90275 l08SOOO 90275 1150000 90275 995000 90275 1680000 90275 2SOOOClD 90275 1099000 90275 l.S4SOOD 91'.>21S 1200000 9027S 1399000 "'275 """"° 90275 859000 90275 1299000 90275 999000 90275 874900 2.S L" 2.75 l.75 3 3.S us 2.75 4.25 2 1.75 1 us L1S '·"' 4.S ' 3.2" 3 s.s 2.75 25 ~75 3 ~75 L75 2.S .. , ' 45 L7S 25 4 25 1.75 l.75 25 2 2 35 25 L1S s 2.25 3.2" 25 25 L7S 2.75 ' 3.25 2.2> L7S 35 ~75 ' 3.75 2.S 2.75 25 2 2632 209.l 1452 21'>G 1214 '"' '"' l!l91 2A29 1'18 3064 3311 ..... 18S> ,... 2191 2018 12841 19n 1890 "'' "" 6351 5314 2780 2312 "" "" ""' 2""1 2432 226' 246& 2'21 ""' 3496 226S 3014 3610 ms ''" 4645 "'" 2110 3952 2'11 3655 202!I l.366 1468 1168 "" 2309 "°' 2850 1876 ""' "" 1985 •m '15> ,. .. 1'60 ,,,... -,, .. 24'0 2330 >Sn 20% 3586 4463 ""' 2741 "" -,.., "'' ""' 8374 47037 22131 "" 10029 "''" 19052 44278 42'40 5200 mos "'" mos ,,.., U3SO 65969 am "'' "'"' 1J!623 21257 21742 .... 16145 ""' ,..,. 13456 1JJOOO 9210 "" !7471 ''" 24413 5500 12A1 10144 "'" 21266 1129' 201'4 11509 '"''' ""' "" 7016 8331 14992 12!159 1)2l '"' """' 19296 6171 U4'S 10759 "" """ '''" """' 7701 21377 1519 "'" "'" 1972 "" 1954 1962 1956 1960 1967 lSS6 1956 l•Sl 1979 1985 ""' "'° 1'61 1992 "" 195• "" ""' 2005 1987 1962 1961 """' "" "" "" 1970 1912 1"0 1'63 "" 1972 2005 1"4 1'63 "" 1978 ""' 1972 1953 "" 1'50 1973 1'66 1SS6 "'' 1961 1989 1960 ISSO "" ms 191'1 "" 1980 1980 1910 1964 1966 "" 2<>1> ,,.. 1963 1'10 "" ,.... 1'10 1!160 1'63 2 Gar;i.ge l Gar~&" 2 Gara1e 2 Garil&t 2 Garage 2 Ganise 2 Gar.age z Ginrge 2 GNag' . lei.af;ige 3 Garage 3 G.vage J Gar;i.ge 3 Gar.ag" 2 Garaee "4 G.arage 2 G...-age 2 Garage 2G.ar• 3 Go:u-;:oee 3 Gauge 3Gar.q;e 3 G.v;ige JGiW;tge 3 G~age 2 Gar.if• 2Gi111'~ 2 GMa&e 3 G.:lfage 7 G;ifil&• 2 Giitage 3 Garage 2G.ar~ l Garage 3 Gu.aje 2Gar;ige 2 Gilfat:e 3 G.arage 3 Garase 4 G.arage J Garage 3 Garage 2 Garag• 2 G:;irage 2Gar• 6Gar;ip J GMa&• 2 J G.arage 2 Gillage 2 Gar.ace l GM.age 3Garap J Gara,;• ....... 3G;ar~ J Gatilf,e 2 Gara,e- 3 Gati\lle 7 G;araa• 3 G;ir.a,• 2Gilf_,.. 2 G;arage 3 Garace 3Garage ,..,,,,, 3 GM-age 2 G;ira;e 2 Gatoiie 3 Gar.1ge 3 GMOiJle 3 G.:lf;11e 2 Garage 3 Gar;igeo 2 Gilrage 2 G.ar:age 2/28/2013 s 11/30/2012 s llJl0/2012 s ll/~}2012 s lOJl.2/2012 $ 10/12/2012 s 12111/2012 s 2/27/2013 s 1}10/2013 s 6/4/2012 s (i/6/2012 s 9/20/2012 s 4/l/2013 s 6/29/2012 $ 9/10/2012 5 6/26/2012 s 2/:?4/2013 s 2/27/2013 s 6/l/2012 s lD/25/2012 s 12/ll/2012 $ lOJ12/2012 5 ft/ll/2012 s 8/2/20U S 8/16/2012 $ 9/27/2012 s l0/2/2012 s 3/l/2DU S 3/1/2013 s 111;?0/2012 s 12{28/2Ql2 s 5/21/2012 $ Sf22/20l2 $ . 9/7/2012 $ 9/14/2012 $ l/3/2013 $ 10/2n/2012 $ 4i17/2013 5 4/22/2013 $ 4/2212013 s 4/23/2013 s 4/23/2013 s 4/2"'2013 s 4/17/2013 s l:/2/2012 s 1.l./8/l012 s 12,'U/2012 s 11/15/2012 s 5/24/2012 $ tOj31/2012 S 11/6/2012 s ll/15/lOll s 1:!/4/2012 s U/6/2012 s 3/8{.!013 s li22/20ll s 3/22/2013 s 3/22/2013 $ 3/29/2013 $ 916/2012 s 10/23/20ll 5 10/31/2012 5 ll/8/2012 s ll/9/2012 5 11/21/2012 s ll~/2013 $ 117/2013 s l/9/2013 5 1''14/2013 5 1/lS/2013 s 3/12/2013 $ 3/19/2013 s 3/22/20U S 3/22/2013 s 3/22/2013 5 3/26/2013 s Mt/2013 5 ~/!l/20U $ <l/<J/2013 $ 3/19/2013 s 6,'21/2012 s 7/26/2012 5 9/14/2012 s l . .t00,900 http;/Jwww I' Clbfomla Real Estate PV130114>4 RE/MAX hl.atoi ProP1=rtoe:lo 780.00l ht.tp://WWW.f• (aliforn1,1 RHI Emote PV12145847 RE/MAX Est.ate Properties 793,000 hup://-ro C;ilifomia Reil Estate PV12146059 RE/MAX Ut.il:e Propel111H 880.000 http://www" Ca.tifom1a Real Estate Vl2U4S67 RE/MAX Em1u: Propertm 680,000 http://WWN.r• California Rea.I ht ate 512096484 Shon!Wood Realtors B60,000 htlp://www.i· C.ilifoml,1 Reill htate Vl201.5964 RE,IMAX [$t;ite Properties 1.050.000 http://wYlw.r• Caffioml" Real Estate S1212S027 Hunter Mason Realty 885,00'.) http://www.ro Ca.llfomia Real Estate INU139098 Keller Wllllmns Palo$ Verdes 930.000 http://www.t> CaHfornl& Real Estilte $812130031 Re/Mair. bee RpV 821,100 http://-.ro California Real Estate Sl20399S3 Re/Mall Execs RPV l.lOS.000 hnp:/t-.ro California Real Estate V11082183 RE/MAX Estate Propertll!$ t,545,000 http://-ro C.allfom1a Real &t•e V1208389S RE/MAX Estilte Properties 2,700,000 http://-,ro C:.1ifonnil Real Estate PVl21S3l04 KeUu Williilm5 Palos Verdi!$ 6;Kl,000 http://www.r> CJl.ISNet MlS Fl204Jaal Coldwell Banker Quality Properties l,400,000 http://www.r• California Real Estat• VU09771l RE/MU En•• Properties 6SO.OOO hu.p;//-.redfln com/CA/Rtmho-Pt~·Verdes/32214-Valot·Pl-90275/htimefl7380$ 950,000 htt"(J://www.ro Californi• Real btal.t! PVt2129976 Coldwell Banbr·PV/Bdi. Cit le$ 2,£28,000 http://WWW.fl Citllfornla Real Estatt! SB130U384 Al"lto & Anodate 765,000 http://www ri Califor111.a Real b1ate 512031781 RE/MAX Estate Propertll!$ 800.000 ht.tp://-.ro C.allfomia Reill btate 512105598 Ke!ll!'f" Williaml RHtty 91l.SOO http://-n <'..llifomia RtM Esute Vl2US791 RE/MAX Estate P1openies L7SO.OOO ht.tp://~-" Callforn1.a Real ESl.ilte 51.2031414 Excel funding R. E. S., Inc 2,100,000 http://w-.ro c.;,Ufomla 11.eal £stall!' Vl.20!>4314 PenlnsulaSotheby's lnt'I Rh.v 3.750,000 http://www.r~ln.com/CA/Ranc:ho-Palos· Vetdes/l·Via-Del-Ot!lo-90275/home/12280415 2.500.000 http:/f~.t> Callfo1nia Real Est.11e Sl2068496 Shoo!wood Reahors INC 1,47S,OOO http://www.r> Callfom4!i Real Estate VU054682 Call Realty 1,136,500 http;//WWW.I' California Rh! btat• 512069190 Shorewood RealtOD 2,tSB,000 http:/lwww.roCallfomlaRea!Es.tateS12072048 KellerWUli..rr>sRea.lty 1.150.000 http://-.ro C.alifomi,t Real Estate PV13015669 RE"/MAX EstM.e Pr~rtll!$ 1.050,000 http://WWW-" California Real Estate 12-6211975 Keffer WmiMM-Sant;i Monica 1,:W0,000 http://WWW.fo C..Utomia Real Est~O 5&12139094 RE/MAX [stale Properties l075,000 hnp;//www.r> Cabfornu Real Estate Vl.20l9030 it.Uei WHllams Palm Verdes ll20,000 http:/lwww.r• Callfomt.aJ\l!al Estate 5120839'3 Cornerstone Pnmlef ProP!!rtiM 973.000 http://www.r• Cillifomia Real Estate V1205336S Keller Williams Palm Verdes 1.090.000 http://www.r. cahfomla Rnl Estate 512089267 Prudential Oillfomie Ruhy 815,000 http://www.I' Callfornilt Real Ul~! PV12153480 Rambll Re•lly 785,000 http://www.redf1n.com/CA/Ranc.ho-P.alos-Venle5/2899-8r011Co-Or-90275/h<mle/n39436 1.060.000 http://www.ro Califom1a Rul Estate 5813033250 Michael Silmett Realty 1.390.000 ht.tp://www.roCillifomlaRu1EstateV12123569 Rockyfiekl 1.410.000 http://wWw.r> California Rul Estate PVlm!i240 Ptninsula Sotheby':. lnt'I Rily 968,000 http://WWW.t• California Re.al £stale P\113028081 Pl'U<hrntilll CaUfomia Rfflty 3,900,000 http://www.ro C.Jlfomla Real Est.lie Vll106486 PenlnsulaSotheby':. fltt'I Rtty 1,550,000 http://www.I' California Real Estate SBl.301094& Ann l.wng Re.tty SOJ.000 http://www.ro Califorrua RHI Estate SBl.3025669 Honw Team Realty 815.000 http:/Jwww.r. California flea.I Estate 51210979"1 Re/Mu Palos Verde$ ltuhy Inc 1,025,000 http;/Jwww.r> Califotl'lia Real E5tatoi Vll047895 cotdwelt6anker-l'V/8ch. Citlel. 1,08i),000 http://www.ro California Rul Est.al• PV1212!834 Co!ctwell Banker-PV/Bdo, Ctlifls 150,000 http://www . ...ofon.«tm/CA/Rth·Pak>s·Vrd/30523-P"'°5·Verdu-Or-E·9027S/ho~/7138579 770,000 hnp://www.mclfin.com/CAJRall(ho-Palos-V~Yan.~-9027S/homt1/7129n2 640.000 htlf!".//www.ro Califom1a Real Est..te 512112684 it.ll•r WIUierm Rulty 545,000 htT.p://WWW.1' Callfomoa RHI E.staee 512120174 PetRll Realty Center, Inc 695,000 httfr.//www.ro tallfomlil Ruf ht ate 22168746 lst Eagle Realty GrOl.IP 91DJXIO http://www.ro Cahfoml• Rflal Estate VUll.&399 Rf/MAX Estate Properties 850.000 hltp://www.r-caUtomla Real Esta1.e Vl206919l RE/MAX Estate Prt1pert~ 630,000 http://www.redfln.r.om/f..A/Ranc:ho-Pal0$-Vetdes/ll.J9..0o1ado-Or·90275/horne/77"30071 810.000 http://www.r-CalifomlaRea!Estate U1689S8JohnHartCorp. 780,000 http:l/www..J> Califomiot Rnl btate 5313016820 The Relll EsUtt! Group 649,900 http://www.fl C;lifom1a Real Estaie SSl2150459 Main 5tf'fft Re.llltoB S2S.OOO hnp://www.ro CallforniaRHI Estate 5813028120 Prudent~ Cllllfomi.. Realty 2.330.000 http://www.n California fW.al Ewtte Vll0Sl421 RE/MAX Enat• Propertlh 874.184 http://www.ro C.allfomia Rul Estate VUll2451 RE/MAX bti!le P1operties 1,360.000 http-.//www.ro Caltfomi.a Real Eslate l2·607-41S RE/MAX E5fATE PRoPERTIES 1.550.000 http://www.r• Cafffomla Real Est..l:e VllU-4758 RE/MAX Estate Propert~ 930,000 http://WWlll." California Real Esl.at• 512086866 Re/Max £xecs Redondo Beac:h 817.000 hup:/Jwww.r. Callfomia.Real hbite Vl2l2S307 Prudentu1I Callfomla Realty l.531.00J http://www.r-Qliforru:ii ~ Estiil\1 PV12l4l797 RE/MAX Esh1te Pn:ift!rtiG l.652,000 http://www.r> Cabfoml.a Re.al Estate 5714098 Compa» Rea.I Estate l.180,000 http://www.ro Otllfornl&Real Estae PVUl33010 KeDer Wi111am5 Palos Verde$ 975,000 hUp://www.r· California keal Eslate Vl211&86"S Coldwell Ballker·PV/Bth. Clliel. 1.095.000 hnp://www.r· tallforni;i RHI Est.ale PYU1.a6546 RE/MAX Estate Pro~ies 1,080.000 hnp://-.r> c.allfamla Re.al Estate 5813009009 Home Toiam Ruhy 942.000 http://WWW.ro Callfomia Ru! Esta1e PV1302S226 RE/MAX Estate Properlll!$ 1.638.000 http://www.I' tallfom!a Rea.I EShte PV121.36l84 RE/MAX Estat• Prop<lftlli:S 2,J:S0,000 http:l/www.ro Califoml11 Real Estaie P832400 RE/MAX Col!egt P,1rk. Realty 1,097.000 http:/Jwww.r-Califom1alW41EstatRSBl.3004l49 ForecastRealtylnt. 1.355,000 htlp:/Jwww.ro Califomlil Real Estilte S8l2l.541D1 RE/MAX Estate Properties 1.268,800 lrttp://www.ro Cahfom1a Rul btM:e PVJatl21SOS Cc\llw.JI Sanker-PY/Sch. Clt•H 1.450,000 http://www..J> Ca!lforl'li.a Real Estate PVl.3044467 RE/MAX Estill• Propertla 2.450.000 http://www.r. Ca!lfornia Rut htilte Vl2038779 Coldwell Sank~r-PV/Bdt. Cttle 820,000 htlp://www.r· Ca!llornia Ri'al Es1111.e 512096435 Premle1 PKlfk Realty 1.265,000 http://www.ro C.llfomla Real Estate Vl2060808 RE/MAX ~state Prop<irties 990,000 hUp://WWW fl Dlifom1a RHI Est at~ V1207027tl AE/MAX Eslal.R PropertJM 8ii0,000 http://www.r· Callfoml1 Real Eslate \112038832 RE/MAX Estate Propert1~ C - 3 6 PastSale SlngleFam1lyResrden1ial PastSiile SinglefamdyResidenti.al PastSale SmgleFam~yRr.11denual P.;istSale Sto1lefamdyR11S~ntial PilStS..le 5inglefamilyResidential PastSale SiogleFamilyResldent1al P<lStSele SlngleF11milyResldential PastSb!e SingleFamllyResldential PastSale 5iogleF11milyResldent1al P.litSale SlnglefurulyResldent1al Pastsale SlngleFamlfvResldenlial PastSale SlngleFamdyRestdent1al PastSale Sin&leFam1tyResident1al PastSale Slnglef.11mityResidl!nt1al Pllitsalt SingieFamilyResldenual PastSale Slnefefamitvflesidentlal Past~ SlrcfeFamifvResldenUal Pll:StSale SingleF11milyReJlOential PllSISale Singlef;Jl'Jllfyl\esldential PllSt Siie Sincle F11111ily Residential Past.sale Sin&lef~llyResldenUal Past.Salt Sin&ie'Famtlyllesldt:ntilll Pll$1 Side Sir.gle Family Raidmtial PastSale Sint1leFamilyReldential PastSale Sintle-FamilyResldenbal PastSale Slnalefamilyllesldential PastS..le ~FamllyRH!dential PastSale SingleFamilyResidentiM Pllt-tSale .511\fllefamilyResldenual P11StSale SinglehnulyResldli!nllal PilStSale SingleFarrnlyRes.ident~ PastSale SillfllefamityResidenlllll Pasts..h! Slnglefarni/yR1!51dellli.al PastSale SlncleFwnl/yRl!Sidtntlal P.artS.le SinglefamilyResidtntlal Pastsale SlngleFaml!rR.esldential P..stS.le StngleFMt11!,Residential P~Sllle SintleFamilyReudtmtial Pi11$tS.le SlngltofamllyResidentiill Pil51Sale SlncleFamil\oResldential P11515ale SingleF11mllyResidenlial PastSale S1naleF11milyRinldentlal PilStS.le Sl!lllefamllyResidentl;JI PastSale SinglefamliyReslde~ Pasts.tie SinglefamilyR1uldent~ Pan~ Single Family RimdenlUll Past~ SlnglefamilyResldenlial Pastsai. SlngleF~tfvResident>al Past Sale Sm&lefamily Resident.al Pastsale SlngleFamilyResident111l PastSale SlnglltFamllyResldential Past Sale Single FamHy Residential PastSale SlnglefamilyResldl!ntlal Pasts;m SlnglefllmlfvResidentlal PastSale S1ncleF11milyResldentlal PastSale SlngleFamilyResidential PastSale 5mdefamilylle$idtntial PllStSale Sinf:lefMnilyResidt!ntial Pz;tSale Singlefan»lyllesldenUal PastSale SmgleFamilyResidential PllSISale Slnglef.milyResidential Pasts.le 51nglefamllyResidential Pas!Sale SinglefamilyResidential P<llot5ale SingleFarmfyResidential P;t$1Sale Sing.lefamil\'Resldential Past Sale Sing)e FllRM!y Retflntial PastSale SlngleFanulyResllk-ntlat Pll:St.s.ie SlngleFamilyResident~ Pil5t5ale Singlefarnll\'Resldentlal Pat.tSalf~ Single Family ResidMUal PmlSllle SlngleFamllyReslde'ntial PastSale SlngleFamllyResidentlal Past Saltt Slnglo!. Family Residential Pas15ale SinglefamilyResident1al PastSalt! SingleFam1lyResiderrt1al Past.sale Sin&JefamdyRestdent1al PastSale SinglefarmfyResident1al PastSale SinglefamtlyResident1al Pasts.le SlnglefillmilyResldentlal PastSaie SlncJefamtlyR1!$~nlial PaslSale SingleFam1lyftesident1al Pas1SaJe Slngk!Fam1lyRtlidenual Past5ale Slnglefam1lyResidential 30721 RUE R111Kho P;rlos V~r~ CA 7095 VIA t Ran~lw P;ilos Verdes CA 70CIU.tEC.llanchoP:a~Verdes CA 31003 RUE Rancho Palos Var des CA 6S VIA DEL Rancho Pal0$ Verlin CA 30327 VIA bntho Pala$ Verde!. CA 30154 Via Rt.h P~los Vrd CA 7206AVEI-Rancho Palos Verdes CA 25 VIA DEL Rancho Palos Verdes CA 7022STAA Rancho Palos Verdes CA 7115 CAMI Rancho Palos Verdes CA 300S1 AVE Randlo Palos VRrde!i CA 28424 GOl Rancho Palos Vetdt:s CA 309l&VIA RanchoPalm.Vetde$ CA l954WestR11nc:hoPalosVerdes CA 28700 Nor R~o Palos Verdes CA Undisdose Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2033WestRa!KhoPllllmVerdes CA 1253WatR11nc:hoPalosV111des CA 27823 co~ Rolling Hills Esta1es CA l8GlS MO Rancho Palos V111des CA 2044 flfOC R~clw P;ilos Verdn CA 642G VIA t R11ncho Pala$ Verdes CA 30011 GIV Randlo Pelot Ve«ie CA 30856\IJA~PalosVerdes CA S PACKET I Rancho Palos Verdes CA 5615 MIST Rancho Palos Verdes CA 293305TO RolJinl! Hilb £$tates CA 6303 ALTO Rane.ho Palos Verde-r. CA 68Sl:ABRIRand!oPalosVerdes CA 108 SPINO Randto Palos Verdes CA S6SOSUN) Rancho Palen. Verdes CA 21 COVE.VI R<tncho Palos Verdes CA 63S3TAAFIRanchoPalos\ler~ CA 98YACHTl~hoP.:tlosVerde5 CA 28509 CO\ R11ncho Palos Verdt:s CA 11 MELA l Ranclm Palos Verdes CA SO VIA MA Rancho PalosVefdes CA 5640 WHO Rancho Palos Verdes CA 5613Scot.R.:anchoPalosVl!fde$ CA 18 SWeetb Rancho p~ Verdes CA 7V!AlAILIRanchoPalosVerdes CA 5943 PEAC Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2 PEPPE RT Rancho Palos Verdes CA 9 FRUIT TR Rancho Palos Verdt:s CA 4 PACKET I Rancho P.alo:s Verdes CA 32 PACKET Jl.lncho Palos Vefdes CA 29138 Oce Rancho Palen V~ CA 57 NAROS 11.antho Palos Verdes CA 465EAWA Randio Palos Verd~ CA 200NNAt.RanchoPalosVerde5 CA 27173 HA~ Rancho Palo$ Ver~ CA 4364 ADM Rancho P11los Verdes CA 6523 VERt Randio Palos Verdes CA 5516SCOTRanchoPalosVetdl!'S CA 5561 MIST R..lncho Palos Vudes CA 27119 SHC: Rancho Palos Verde$ CA 5305 WAU Rancho Palos Verdes CA 4110 PAl.C llanche> P11los V11rdiu CA 4030ADM Rancho Palo,. Verdel. CA 32317 PH, Rancho Palos V~des CA 3276 OflU Randie> Palos. Verdi?$ CA l2S34SEA Rancho Palm Verdes CA 31121 GA~ Rancho P.alm Verdes CA 3332 CORI Rancho Palos Vl!:f~ CA 30731 GAt Rancho P~ Verdes CA 2045EASC.RanchoPalo$Ver~ CA 4112 EXUl Raneho P.:alos Verdes CA 33 ROCKIN Rancho Palo$ Verdd. tA 2'303 v1sn Ranche> Palos Verdes CA l7GOLO£f~hoPalosVerdes CA 30637 GM Rancho Pall» Verdes CA 3S4S!>fAR Rancho Palm Verde CA 2160VIA(RanchoPalosVerdes CA 261.S 5UNf Rancho Palos Verde CA 3822PIRA..RanchoPalo:i.Verde. CA 2S21C0t.T RanchoPalosVudes CA ·'JO MUS'fA Rancho Palos Verdi!$ CA 4S12Eas11RanchoPalosV11r~ 271GOPAl Ranehe> Pak» Verdes lO MARTlt R.lncho Palos Verdes 3626COOI Rancho Palos Verde!> 3675CUFFR..a!KhoPalosVerdes 90275 998000 90275 U48000 90275~ '30275 4995COO 90275 978000 9027' 90275 1.399(X)) 9027S 4690000 9027S ll9SOOO 9027S WSOOOO !!0275 2500000 90275 795000 90275 999000 90275 589000 90275 709900 90275 425800 90275 549000 902.75 678000 90274 869000 90275 659000 90275 759000 90275 819000 90215 99SOOO 90275 1898000 90275 1799900 9(>275 1137500 90275 1060000 90275 l24SOOO 90275 15990CO 90215 msooo 90275 810000 90275 1495000 902.7S 880000 90275 154900) 90275 90275 910000 90275 1595000 90275 l12SOOO 90215 90215 90215 1599000 90275 1380000 90275 1099900 90215 1100000 90275 825000 1295000 """ 90275 1300000 90275 1675000 90275 1460000 90215 720000 90215 90275 90215 1250000 9027S 1250000 90215 u~ 90275 1000000 90275 900000 90275 ll40000 90275 1165000 90275 929000 9027S l6S9000 90275 lOSOOOO 90215 999000 90275 1249000 90275 1075000 902i5 90275 3850000 90275 780000 90275 879000 9027S 1050000 90275 259000 90215 1374900 90275 ll29000 90275 350000 90275 90275 90275 90275 2575000 90275 1190000 90275 739000 1.75 3.5 s .,, ' 2.5 3 4.5 25 l.75 l.75 l.15 2 1.75 3 3.5 2 3.5 2 2.5 2.25 2.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 2 45 2.25 L75 2.5 2 2.25 1.15 1.75 2.75 2.5 ' 1.75 1.75 L75 15 3 L75 2.25 2.75 6.25 2 L75 0.5 3 2.25 ' 2 3.5 4 5.5 25 1183 3547 4553 ""' 8340 2249 2191 1650 6750 2242 2600 6237 2157 1926 ma "" 741 1409 1'03 160.2 140> 11"7 1105 2&55 3500 2461 2865 ""' "" 1669 2539 1413 22U 3024 44'9 2866 ,.., 2397 4632 3084 2000 2167 .. ., lliO 2858 1S68 184'1 2459 1442 4000 1Si19 3576 22>2 3233 2059 1941 2302 "'61 20U 3313 2100 1832 3225 1110 1'89 2766 "'" '°" 2074 663 2822 "'' ""' '405 3~92 3160 ms 2244 ""' 4950 21496 10003 25567 10115 15859 24929 8tl68 .... 1"'62 """ ""' ,... ,... , .. ,. 7474 ., ... um 6575 10161 7352 U<OO '""" 10023 1119< '"'" 13363 16568 322ll 9310 166il3 ,.., 8667 .... 1<WO .... 10037 27686 25953 8134 9609 "'"' 4163 31304 7317 13177 6,... 9250 17217 9'129 7912 ""' 104$1 u ... 16217 13416 8831 ll24S 8706 3687 10S98 43679 2'950 13307 19420 13U 20038 moo 18571 l!l069 """ 24241 204'1 24880 "''° 1960 ''"' 1961 1969 1972 200< "'"' 1974 ,.., 1963 1960 1955 19'57 1950 19SS ""' '957 1962 lSSl 1969 1968 2007 1968 1967 ..., lm 1>53 ms 19S9 1951 1972 .. ,. 1990 1965 19'6 1956 1990 ..,. 195S 1952 1956 1959 1%5 l!lSl 1954 1959 .... 1972 1%7 1967 1958 1958 1955 1959 1963 196' 1982 1965 l961 1967 1953 1959 .... 1967 1'69 1956 1956 ""' 1956 1959 1970 - 2 G31.3g11 lGal.ige 3 Gv.tlP 2 GaragP 3 Gar;qte 2 G.:arotge 3 Garage 4 GMage 2 Garag• 3 G¥age 3G3'11Ct 2 Galli£• 2 Gllfagf' 2 Garage 4 Garage 1 Garll(t 4 Gang• 2 Garare 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 Gll'.qe 2 Garage 3 Garq• 2 G.arqt 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 Garage 3G;;nge l Gatage 2 GMage J Garage 2 Garage 2 2 Garage 2 Gar.ige 3 Gara&• 2 Garqe 3 Garage 3 Garac• 2 Garap 2Gara,e 4 Gar.11111 2Giti'";!IV 2 Gilfate 2Ga~ 2Garap 2 G11rage 2 Garaa• 2 Garage 3 G•rar:• 2 Gotrag.. 2 Garagt 6 Garage 2 Garae• 2 Garage '""- 2 G.vace 2 GaJage 2 Garage 2 Gar.age 3 Gar::.ge ' 3 Garage 2 Gar<>Jte 4 Garas• 2 Garage 2 Garas• 1 Garage 0 7 Garag• ii Gatllfle 2 G.ua&• 2 Garage 2 GiNa&• 5 Gilf"age 4 Garagt 3 Garage SGarage ll/16/20U S U/16/2011 S 11128/2012 s 12/19/2012 s 12121/2012 $ 1/8/2013 $ 12/31/2012 $ 1/10/2013 s 1/25/2013 s 3/26/2013 s 3/28/2013 s 3fi9/20B S 4/5!2013 $ 4/16/2013 $ 8/31/2012 $ 9/10/2012 $ 9/12/2012 $ 9/18/20U S 10/11/2012 s 10/26/2012 s ltt.8/2013 s 3/lS/2013 S 3/27/2013 s 9/13/2012 s ll/2f./2012 s 3120/2013 s 7/16/1.012 s 7/~20U S 7{30/2Dl2 s 8/30/2012 s 8/31/2012 s 8/31/2012 $ ~/l/2012 $ 9/712012 s 9}14/2012 s 9J17/20U S 9/25/2012 s 9j2&/2012 $ 10/5/2012 s 9{21/2012 s 1'1/9/2012 5 "10/22/2012 s 10/22/2012 s 10,22/2012 $ 10[26/2012 s 11./9/2012 s 1200/2012 s t2t27no12 s US/2013 S 2/22/~13 s 2J22/20U S 2/28/2013 s 3/5/1013 S 3/5/2013 s 3(.!6/2013 s 4/3/200.3 s 4111/2013 s 4/ll/2013 5 1131/2013 s 2/:!0/2013 s 3/19/2013 s 3/27/2013 s 3/28/2013 s 4/12/2013 s 4112/2013 s 4/ll/2013 s 4/12/2013 s ltl,'l/2011 s 7{1.1/1012 s 7/17/2()12 s 7/17/2012 s 7/13/2012 s 7i19/2012 s 7/25/2012 s 8129/2012 s 9/1/2012 s 9/7(2012 s 9113/2012 s 9119/2012 s 91:!1.1'2012 s 9/25/2012 s 9120/2012 s 9i16/2012 s 1,020.000 h!tp://www r, Callh.rnia RNI Estate V1Ul9551 RE/MAX Estate Propen:!e$ 1.180.000 hllp://www.t• C.llforma Real Es~e V12075622 Coldwell Sanker P.V./South 8.iy 2.no.000 ht1p;/Jwww "Califo.n1a Reill ht ate SUlO~ Keller Williams P11los Vertles 1,240.ClOO hnp://www I> Califorma Real E$tale 5812136794 Shorewood ReahoB INC 4.aoo.ooo h11p:/.lwww "C:illfomia Real Estate VU075908 Coldwell Banker P.V./South Bay 1,030,000 hUp://www.r· C..lifomh\ Rul Estate TRU129399 C-21 E·N Achhwe~ Realty ).()90,000 http;//www.redfiri.com/CA/Rch·Palos-Vrd/30154-Via-R.ivera-90275/home/774SOS3 1.375,co:> 'nttp;//www.f' Callfoml;i Real Estate VU07322S Peninsula Sotheby's lnt'I Rtty 4,S00,000 hnp;//www,. CalifomaReal Estate 1'835404 .Sunnyside Realty & ln\'e$1llll!:nt 1.195,000 hnp:J/www.t> CalifornlaReal Estate PVl.3024991 RE/MAX btate Propeni& 1.175,000 hnp:/Jwww.I\ California Real £.state RS130W202 New Wen Real Estate 2.325,000 http:l/www.r• Califomi11 Real Estate \/U085503 Keller William5 P~ Verdes 795,000 htlp:l/www "C.alifornl11 Rnl Estllle OC1302816& Pnidt!nt1al CallfomJa Rulty 9SS.OOO http://-r>Californiallnl Esl111.e ll-648635 Keller WilliamsRlry-~;/lA S2S,OOO http;J/www "CallforOO. Real fUalt Sl21l3l539 Re/Mall ElleG RPV 630,000 http://www.r•CalffomlaRulbtat• 1'820905 Callfomia.RukyN<!!twork 425,000 http;//W>NW.I\ California Real Esta1e St209S784 Golden West Realty SS0.000 http:/lwvNu• Callfomi. Real Estill.e 512091099 K~ Williams. Beach Goes 678.000 http://www." Cllllfom~Re11I Estate \112098689 KeUar Williams Palo$ V~ 815,000 http://www.I\ California Real £.slate \112092276 Kellet WUliams Pakls Ven:l6 655,000 http://www." callforn•all•al Estille PVl2140053 Keller WilliMns Palos Ve~ 781,000 hn.p·/Jwww.I\ CaliforruaReal Estate 1>'113008905 RE/MAX £stall!: Propel\ies 811,500 http://www "Callfomiaflut btat• P\11~4353 RE/MAX btate Properties 970,000 http://www.f> c.ut'omlaReal EstateS120SS417 Keller Willlllrm &each Olies 1,850,000 http:J/www.r• California Real £.state \112118873 RE/MAX E.Jtale Properties 1,700,000 http://www.r• Callfomia llnl Estate SB12149S31 Shorew«>d Re.Slors INC 1,080,000 http://www" C.ailfomla Real Estate VUD64304 RE/MAX Eslate Properties 1,060,000 http://www" California Re-al btaie V1"2007402 The Rea!Eslall!: Gre>up l,205,000 http:/fwww_,. Ctlife>rnla Real Est.ate Sl.2063161 South 8;ty 8rokeB, Inc l,599,000 hnp://.-... Caltfomia Real Estate Vl20411U RE/MAX Est.ate Properties l,300,000 hllp;//-.r> California Real Estate Sll07B405 Re.:al ht.Ile West 175,000 hup:j/www.P Calif om~ Real Estate 12·596091 Stwe l.Jyemllf"a 1,400,000 h!tp://www.r• Callfornl.lfkial EsUll.I! V12083109 RE/M.+.>t Estat• Propert~ 888,000 htlp://WW#.1\ Ca!ifomlaReal Edate V12089175 RE/MU Estate Propl!nl~ 1,470.000 http://wWw.r• CallfomlaReal htate S12073941 Keller Wl!I~ Realty 1.080.000 http://www.r> callfotnla Real Estiitf 512091812 Shorewe>od Rultcm !Ne: 910,000 http://,,,_.,.. Cllilfom1~ Reaf Est.:aie S1.20l8452 RE/MAX.Estate Pfopertlc5 1.530,000 httrrJ/www.r· C8Hfornia Real Estate V111S36Sl Coldwell Sanket P.VJ$oulh Sa~ 1.100,000 http://-.r> Ca.Lifom111 Real Estate Vl2101539 RE/MAX Estate Prope:nles 880,000 http:/Jwww.mflf\.com/CA/Rllncho-Palos-Verdes/5613-Swtwood-Dr·9027S/bome/7741300 1.020.000 hrlp;//www.tedfln.com/CA/Rancho-Pal0$-Verde$jl8-swutbav-lld-90l75/hf>me/174-0377 1,588,000 http;//wWW."P C8llfornl• Rtitl Est at• \112059217 llE/M>Jl Estate Properties l,2'79,36S http-.//w-.ri Callfnmla Rul Esiate V12047175 Prudential California Realty 1,079,000 hllp:/Jwww.r· Ullforn1a Real Estate VU000110 Keller WlllilllTIS Palos Verdes L045,000 http:/Jwww."P Ulifornia Real Estate VU097899 RE/MAX Estate Properties 325.000 http://-.1> C..llforn!a Real E.Jtate 5l212fi187 C·21 Amber Realty 1.100.000 http://www.r> California Real Estaie Sl2079622 P.lldfic. Land Corporatiol"1 9l0,000 tm:p:j/www rHfln.corn/CA/Rancho-Palos·V•rdes/29138-0uanrldge-Dr-'JC275/home/7741236 1,300.000 http://www.f> Caitfornoa Re.S ht.Ille SB13000l.l6 Team South Bay Realty 1,550,000 http;//WWw.t• Callfonua Real Estate Vl2l2S473 Keller Williams. Palos V•rdRS 1,453,750 htt.p://w.IW.r• c.lifomi11 Real Estate PV121S47S& Keller William5. Palos V•nlti 700,000 http://www.r• Callfami• Rn! Estate Sl20:57236 Kellrn Wllllllm$ Realty l.GS0,000 http://www.r> Cllllfotnla RNI Estate 511006099 Plldfic Land Corpo~iol"1 860,000 hnp://www.ri Callfomla Real Estate 5812154076 RE/MAX btate Propertlti 1,100,000 ht.tp://-.1\ tallfomla Real Estate PV12152468 Prude~ California Realty 900,000 http://www.I\ cantomiaReal £slate 1'839531 Coldwell ~ker Best Realty 1.259,000 http;//www.t> CaUfornia Real Estate PVl303Sl530 RE/MAX £$late Propert~ 1,075,000 http:}/www f> C.lffomia RNI Ulate PV13035428 RE/MAX Estate PropelliH 745.000 http://WWW.l'C.!ifomiallealht;ifeP\i1300264& ~ign 1,098.883 http://www.1> CllQfomla Rl!:"al Estllle 1Gl3001l6l Griffin Real Est.te, INC. 1.140.000 http://www.r• c.llfoml11 Real Estate PV1ll27A6S RE/MAX £slate Properties l000,000 http://~.,, California Real Estate P\113019452 RE/MAX Eshite Propenies l,740,000 http://www.1> CaUfomia Real Uta1.e SBl.3000366 Shorewood Reahors INC 1.050,000 http://www.t• c.ut'oflli.a Real £state S81306S453 Beach Cit¥ etokers 991.000 hnp://www.r-California Real EstMe S812130024 Th!! Real Estate Group 1.310,000 htlp:l/www.ri Calilcm>1 Real Estate P\113040703 Penmsulll Sotheby's lnt1 Rlty 850,tal hllp-.//WWW.r• Callforrna Real Est at\" 5812149445 Mau pi~ RealtOB 800.000 http;//www.1> California Real Estate St208Sa91 &rteld Realty 1,090,000 hnp://www.r· Callfomiaftul £slate V12060078 RE/MAX Utate Properties 3,300/Xl() http;IJwww.r. CalifornlaReal Estate llU0.3041l Penmsuh!Sothebr's ln11 Riiy 810,000 http://www r· California f\eal est.le Sl20730S6 Shorewood Reall~ 835,000 http://www ... (allfornt.Rul Estate Vl.2072832 RE/MAX Estate Properties. 950,000 http;Jj-...r> C.allfomi11 Rut Eslllte 511081048 Keher Witllelm Reall~ 200.000 http;//_._ t• California Real Estate 51:2045245 C·21 Amber Re11lty 1,250.00CJ hllp;J/www.roCaliformaRealbt;iteNl10281•5 McGrawRealty 1,055.000 htT.p:/fwww.t• callfornia Real Utate P826100 Mam SI reel Realton 850,000 hnp://www."P C;alifornla Real Estate 512112409 Standard Real Estate Sentices 1.275.000 http://www.r• C..Hfornla Real Estate St2074661 Kellet Willlllrns Realty t.Sto.ooo http://www.r· C11Hfo111i• Real Estate 1111044372 RE/MAX Estate Properties 828,000 http;//www.1> C11litomla Real htllle V12099815 KeUer W1lliatn5 f'-1os Verrles 2.335,000 httrrJ/www.r· CIHfoml.a Real E$tate \112052786 Coldwell Sanker P.V./South Bar 1.190.000 http://www.f> California Rnl Esta1e 22165002 setheby"1 lntematlonal Realcy 759.500 hllp;//www.r Callfi;ornia Roi bl ate Sll021802 kelll!:f" Wdlwns Beach Cit~ C - 3 7 Pa:i.tSale 5m&lefiomilyResodenlial Pa:i.tSale Sln&lefatnllyResidential Pa:i.tsale Sin1lef~flllly Resldent1.al ~tSale SinchifamilyResidential Pa:stSale SinelefamiJyResklenllal P.astSlff! SlnglefanulyR~idential Pans.ale SinclefamilyRnident1al Pa:i.t Sale 5u'lde Famlty Resldefltial Pan.sale SlrclefamllyResidentlal P.astsai. SinglotF.mllyResidenti;tJ PastSale Si~f¥nllyfte5ident•al Past Sale Si~ family Resllfflitial Pa:i.tS..kr Stn&ktf.amilyResident1al Pa5t 5ale Sin~ Family Resldet11ial Pa:i.tSale Sl~FamilyRnldentJal PastS;ale SlngleFamllyResidenlial Pa:i.tSale SlngktfamllyReloidentlal Pa:i.tSale SlrttJeFamllyReslden~ Past S;ale Single Family Reslckntlal PastSale sineleFamilyRHidential PastSlle Sl~FamllyRes~lal PiatSlle SinglefamllyR~nlial Pan sale S111cle Family Residential PastSale SingltlfamllyResidenllal PastSale SingiefamllyResidentlal PMtS.ale SlngleFamilyResidentlal PastS..le Sin1lefamilyResldential Past!..ile smclefamtlyResldemlal PastSa!e Sln1lt!FamrlyResldentlal PastSale SmgklfamllyResodential PastSaJe Singlti!fMnilylleslClential PastS..111 SingleFMnllyResldent>al PastSale Slnglt!famllyResldentlal PaJtS.lt. Sl~familyResklenUal PartSale Slnglefami!ofResldentlal Pas1Sale Sin&leFamllyResklential Pastsale SlnglefamilyR1Hidentlal Pasts.le-S1nglefamilyllald1mtial PastSak! S!ngleF.lmifvResidential Pi1$tSale SinglefamllyResklenlial P•tSale SinglehmilyRaldential P;ist5.ie SlnalefamltvResldentlal Pasts.le SlnglefamllyReslcttntial Pansale SinglefamilyResldentlal Pa,ts.&ieSlngleFamllyRes~lal PastSale SinglefamttvResldenti.al PastSalt Si111;lefamltvResidenU.W PastsaltSincleFamify~•al PastSiltil SinglefamllyResldenttal Pasl Salt Slnde FoNJUtr Resldentl.ll PastS;ih Si,,.t.f~R1!$identlal Past.salt SlngiefamllyAesldential Past Slit Single Fvniy Residentlal Pi15tsale Singk!FamffyResldtntial P.utSalt SinglefainilyReslMnl:1al PastS.ale Slngh!FamifyResldential P-.tS;ile SingltfamilyResidenttal Pasts.alt SmglefamiiyRestdffit~ Pi15tSalt SinclefamilyResldential PMtSale SinsJeFamifitResidel'ltiill PastSalt Sin&ktFafllilotResflltnl:iill PastSale SinglefamilyResidential PastsaleSingleFamilyRes~ial Past sale Slntle Family Resadentlal Past.Nie SingleFarnilyResidtntial PastS..le SinglefarmlyRa>dent1al PastSble SingleFamllyReslcttntlal PastSale s;ngftFilfTlilyResident1al PastSale Slngh!'famliyRl!Stdtntlal Petsale SinglefamilyResidentlal PastSale Slnr;leF•mllvRe51dtntlal Pasts.kt Si11t1:lef.2mllyResldential Poasts.lt: SifllleF~JlyResldential P..stSale 5lnglefamtlyResld.!ntlal PastSale StnglefamllvResidential PaslS&le SingieFam1tyResidi!nt.1al Pasts.!e S.ngleFam1lvR~nual Pit!otSale Sin&JeFamilyResldentJal Pit!otSale Stng/tfem!tyResldentJill Pasts.ale Sin&lefam1lo,llesicttntiill PastSale Slnglefam1lyResiden1ial P<DtSale 5mgleFam1lyResidential PaslS.le SinglefamilyResidenllal 2907S Cl£' Randio Pal<» Verdti CA 3754 fAlC• 11.mci>O Pal<» Ver~ CA 4321 EllUl hncho Palos V11rdfl CA 3510 COOt Raru:ha Pal<.>$ Verdes CA 325S PARK Rancho Pi!<.>$ Verde CA 40495TAL'RanclioP.llo»Verdes CA 4245A.OM Rancho P;ilo$ Verdes CA 4125 DAUi Rancho Palos Verdes CA 35208.fN[RanchoP<tlosVetdti CA 29048 PAL Rant.ho Pakts Verdes CA 3648VIGllllanthoP2'o:.Vetdes CA 2939 CRO\ Ranclia Palas Verdes CA 2410 COLT Rancho Palo$. Verde$ CA 43 CAYUSE bncho Palm Verdes CA 29918 KN( bn<:ho Palos Verdes CA 30816RUERanchoPakn.Verdfi CA 2122 GAlK RAnCho Palos Vefdes CA 27109PEJ.RanclioPalasVerde) 3066 DELU Rancho Palos Verdes 6 Calle V"tt Rancho Palos Verdf!:!i CA 3343 CRO\ Randio Patos Verdes CA 2036Wesl:RandtoPalosVerdes CA 21SS W ~ Rancho Palas Verde CA 2811 Coll I P;r,las Vetdu Penins11la CA 27601 PAL Rancho Palos V&tde$ CA 2744 coral Rancho Pa!M Verde. CA l0611TARRanchoPalo1.Verde$ CA 53 AVENIO Rancho Palos Vetde:. CA 28024E~RandioPa!osVerdes CA 21oi CAOC Raindio Palas v..-~ CA 27154 Eau Randto Palos Verdes CA 2802S. CAL Rancho Pal0$ Ve«tes CA 65Q!t VIA ( Ralidw Palm. VMde$ CA 1952 Tllut Randio P;ilm. Vet de CA 2104 CHAt Randw Palm. Verdes CA 1933 UPlA Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2027 VELE. Rancho Pikn. Verdes CA 6405 VIA ( hncho P.SOS Verde$ CA 21SS fAlRI Rancho Palos Verdes CA 1323 VALL bncho Palo$ Verdes CA 1852TRUlRanchaPalo$Verdes CA Und!Jd~ Rancho Palas Verde$ CA 2024 Wesl R.ncho Palm Verdes CA 2289 SPAR Rancho Palos Verdes. CA 28601 MO R.ancho Paki5 Vetdes CA S738SCOT Rancho Palo$ V111de!. CA 5726 SUN~ Rant.ho Palm Verdes CA 1814 SANl Rancho Palas Verda 16SURRE'tRanchoPalo$Vetdes 2934&STO Rollin& Hiib Estatll!S CA 27810 ~Rancho Pa!DS Virrdes CA J.922AVEllRanchoPal0$Verdfl CA 2024 REOC Rancho PMos Verdes CA 29310QUJRollingHilbEstates CA 29413 SM-Rancho Palos Verdes CA 1928 AVU. Rancho Palas Vet des. CA 3441 NEW Rantho P~ Verdes CA 2926 CRO~ Rantho Palo!. Verdes CA 8 Al8ERO •Rancho Pakn. Verde$ CA 30035 GNI Raru:ho Palos Verdes CA 90l.imoJ1t·R.anthoPalo$Vetdll!S CA 6519 SANl Rant.ho Palos Ve«ies CA 6 SUflREY I Rancho Palm Verdes CA 29916 AVE Rancho Palo5 Verdes CA 2158 Wet Ra'ncho P;alos Verdes CA 1433 CADC Rancho Pal0$ V11tdes CA 2212VIA\iRandioPalD$.Vf!fde$ CA 5323 WAU Rancho Palos Verdes CA 28447 CEO Rancho Paler.; Vetde:s CA 28067 SM Rancho Palo$ Verde$ CA 28619 PlA lbncho Palo~ Vl!fdes CA 6616 MAD Rancho P.alos Verde CA 6l04SCOJ bnchoP~Verdes CA l797SPAl R.anchoPalosV<!1de$ CA l0221KIN•RanchoPalosVerde$ CA 31131 PAL Rancho Patos Verde CA 30259 Ea,t Ran~ho Pak» V111del. CA 4206STAI.' Rancho Palo$ Verdes CA 3S58BENlRanchoP.JIO$V<!!rde!i CA 32413 SEA Rancho Pilos V&rdr.. CA 346S HEllt Ram.ho Palm. Verdes CA 3420COOlRanchoP&losVer~ CA 32221 PH> hndio Palm. Ver~ CA 90275 1375000 90275 90275 1029000 90275 995000 90275 869000 S027S 919000 90275 !B9000 90215 1149000 90275 849000 90215 999000 SOZ75 1279000 90275 829000 90275 1199000 90275 997000 90275 775000 90275 849000 90275 1495000 90275 90275 1425000 90275 699000 90275 90275 90275 1195000 90275 90275 959000 90275 10'J9000 90275 919000 90275 769000 90275 751000 90275 1195000 90275 """"" 90275 880000 90275 619000 90275 """"' 90275 810000 90275 695000 "'""" 819000 90275 740000 90275 650000 90275 699000 90275 """" 90275 975000 90275 1099000 67'900 90275' UlDOCIOD 90275 usoooo 90275 735000 90275 """"" 90275 679900 90274 1319000 90275 1248000 90215 699000 90215 1195000 92075 1199000 90275 1799000 90275 1295000 90275 90275 """"' 90275 950000 90275 10SOOOO 90275 1l9900 90275 $5000 90275 995000 90275 799500 90275 """"' 9('.)275 815000 9027S 1195000 90275 919000 90275 949000 90275 940CXlO 90115 699888 90275 1350000 90275 18&&000 90275 77SCXX> 90275 12S.0000 90275 1100000 90275 889000 90275 1100000 1190000 3 2 2.75 2.25 2.S 1.75 2.75 2S u L75 2 275 0.25 ,, L75 3 3 3.>S L75 2 2.25 L75 2 L75 us L7S L75 2.5 L75 2 275 2 2.25 ,. L1S . 215 2 2.75 2.75 2 2.25 3.25 4 3.S 1.75 3 •.25 L75 1.75 2.S L75 3 ... 3 4.2S 1.75 3 2.5 2 3782 2551 1927 '"" '""' 1865 2488 2615 3707 1843 2801 2695 2560 2000 1659 """ 4891 3823 1 ... 1250 "'" 2800 3131 1509 1774 ms 1864 '''" 1 .... 2596 1136 1'46 1375 1'82 ,.., 2301 '"" 2170 2310 2"8 2506 m6 3000 2$ ,, .. 1568 17'0 2709 -""' 2771 3124 ,,,. 3171 4659 3036 2354 2459 1442 2016 181' 2'60 1925 2S53 5000 1750 2156 4781 '°'' 2037 ""' 2'44 2054 22717 12515 11528 14627 209'8 11754 10386 """ 9909 21246 12958 21039 20418 26577 13984 6518 "'" U2<>S llJ.1 23566 10342 JOU> 27904 12613 23260 14845 """ .8122 14910 8416 11337 U405 1756 638• 7082 m1 .... 23471 7"'3 .9337 , ... i.i1s1 8744 6394 .... 10573 9059 14958 7518 18944 22220 14154 16620 - 9U1 22868 67U 12438 12476 7746 8135 21'188 1951 15103 63481 U639 16388 111197 1970 1960 1969 1960 1960 1956 1960 1965 1962 1964 1965 1960 "" 1971 1913 1963 1958 1960 1975 1955 1955 ,.., 1951 1946 1957 "'" "" 1950 1963 1969 1.950 1963 1950 1958 "'" 1.955 1958 1993 1959 1955 1959 1914 1963 l,.. 1'58 1958 1,.. 1959 1959 1962 1"8 1966 "" 1961 1964 1999 1969 1964 1987 1954 "" 1963 1973 1.961 19'8 1964 1962 1971 1973 2012 1957 1969 ""' 1%< ,..., 1971 "" 1963 3 G.ar46e 2 G;ir4e z Gar;;,,ge 3 Gatage 2 Gatagto 4 Garage 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 Gar<J8e 2G¥~e 2Garage 2 Garag• 2 Garage 2 Gilfage 3Garage 2GMage 4 Garage 2 Garago: 6 Garage 3~.iogt 2Gar:aie 10 Gaf.age 4 Garagt 2 Gar.11e 2 GMaee ;! GMage 2G~e 4 Giriltlt' 3 G:irage 2 Garqe 2 Garage 2 Gat21e 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 Gar;ige 2GMog• 2 G.arat;t 2 G¥..ge 4 ...... 2 Garage 2 Gara&11 2GM~e 2<i»3gl' 2 Gar.11e S Ga•<1111 2 Girace l<iar"Be 4 .,., ... 2Garap 3 Garqi' ,._ 2 Gu..,e 2 Gar.1111 4 Garaee 3 Garage 2 Garage 2 G;u.11e 3 Garage 2 Garage 2 Garage 3 Gar;;age 3 Garage 2 Garatt' 2 Garaff 2 Gara,e :.z Garage 3Garage 3G.arag:e 4 Ganat" 4 Garage 3 Garage 7 Garage 2 Garille 3 Garage i GariJ!e 6 Garage 3 ...... 2 Gar.-ge 9.'28/2012 s 9!18/2012 5 l0/17/2012 s 1W'26/2012 S 11,'26/2012 s 12/18/2012 s 12/28/2012 $ 12/28/2012 s 12/31/2012 s l/7/2013 s 1116/2013 s 1!16/2013 5 1/17/2013 s 1118/2013 s 1'25/2013 s l/25{2013 $ l/18/2013 s 1.ll&/101~ s 10/16/2012 s 7131/2012 s 9118/2012 $ 10/16/2012 s ll/19/2012 $ S/'24/2012 S 10/:Ki/2012 5 1/22/2013 s 3/19/2013 $ 4/3/2013 $ 4/23/2013 s 1/10/2013 s lllS/2013 S 2/26/'2013 s 2/27/2013 s 2/2S/2013 $ 3/6/2013 s 3/B/2013 s l/l:l/1013 s 3/13/2013 $ 4/8/2013 s 4/12/2013 s 4/18/2013 s 4/15/2013 s 4/19/2013 5 SJ16/2012 s S/8/2012 5 S/22/2012 S 6{29/2012 s 6128/2012 s 6/14/2012 s 8114/2012 s 5/1U2012 S 5/11{l012 s 8/lll/2012 s 6/21/2012 s 8/21/2-012 s 8/24/2012 s S/2/i012 S ~125 f/l9/l012 s 8/1/7JJ12 s i/31/2012 s 6/20/2012 5 ~i30/2012 5 i/17/2012 5 514/2012 s 7/6/2012 5 5/8/2012 s ~/l&/2012 s ~2/20125 {./14/2012 s f!l'ls./2011 s 7/12/2012 s 6./10/2012 s 6/23/2012 s 5/4/2012 s ~'15/2012 5 !>/23/2012 5 f./15/20U S r~'21/2012 S 1/9/2012 5 ~.'27/2012 s 8/3{2012 s 8/23/2012 s l,287,SOO http·//www t> Cilbfornlall.e;al£$tile V1111042S RE/MAXbtatePropertiel. l,37S,OOO http:l/www.r-Cal!forni;a Re.al £staie V12107424 Keller Will~ PalOJ. Verdes 870,000 hnp:/Jwww.ro O.lifornia Real ES1ate Tl.2007639 C;ike Realt"' 990,000 http:/lwww.J• C.ltlomia Real btille 512088919 Eio:11 Realty Ex~rts 920,000 hllp:/Jwww r• califomla Real Estate V12117667 PruMnUal CSlifom1a Realty 951,{0) http://www.r• Califol'JM Rut ht ate PVUl.33994 Peni~ula Sotheby'.s lnt'I Rlt.., 910,000 http://www.ro caDfornla Resl Estate PV12127619 Coldwell B1nktr P.V./Sauth Say 900,000 htlp://www.r> California Real Estate PV1213478S Keller Wiiiiams Palos Verdes 1.149,000 hnp:J/www.r> Califomla Real £slate PV12151042 RE/MAlt Estate Propertle!. 833,000 hltp:/jWW#.r> Callfomla Rul ES1ate PV1214llS3 Kelltr Will!Ml1$ Palo$ Ve¥dt$ 1,087.SOO http://WYM.r> Callfomia Reil Esta!:t PV\2141703 Coldwtll Ban~r P.VJSOuth S.ay 1.250,000 htlp://,,,,__n Oll.rfom1.-Real bl it• PV12137101 R[/MAX E!late Propertin 805.000 hup:I/.,,._.,.. Callforma Real Esta!:• PV12l30727 RE/MAX Estate Propert!M 1,02S,OOO http:/fwww.f' CaUforn1<1 A•al Estat• V12069398 RE/MAX Emit• Properties 1,184.000 htlp://WNW,f' Callforni.I Real &tat• PV1214S764 Rl/MAX Es.late Propertiel; 970,000 http:l/www.r-californil Roi Es.tate Sl209l344 Rt/Mail: EMa Roetlondo Seaeh ns,000 http:/jwww.ro O.tlfornla Rnl £slate VU070883 RE/MAX Estiiltt Ptopertla 890.000 http://W'-NW.ro C..l/fomli Ru.I Es1ate SBUJ.367U Shorewood Reahors l.4S0,000 hUp:/}www.ro Oliforni. RHI btate Vl2110282 JC:eller Wlff1ams Palos Verdes 1,800,000 http:l/www.redfln.oi;om/G6./Rantho·Palos-Verdes/S..~le-~to-90275/home/&ll2259 1.37S,SOO !tttp://w-NW.t. California II.HI Est;ateo Vl2098247 RE/MAX ~tate Properties &92,000 hUp://WWW.t> Calrfom111 Rul ht<lle Vl'2105835 Karol A. ~r, Rt.altOJ 530,000 http://www.redfln.com/CA/Randlo-Pa!o$·Vtrdes/21S>W-General·5t·9027S/home/n33381 1,035,000 http:l/www.redfln.com/CA/P.Jos·Verdl!l>-Penmsula/2811-Colt·Rd-9021S/horne/773~17 l,146.500 http;//www,r.CallfornlaRulEstateSl.2096932 ~¢nRe.ltors 180,000 htlp:/fw-.t'1tdtln «1m/f.A/R•nU>r:rPalo$·Vetd~744-Coral·Rlil1e·Rd-9027S/horne/n33043 959,000 hr.tp:/Jwww.ro callfornif. Rul Estate PV1ll"5962 RfJMAX Estate Properties 91Q,OOO htlpi/WMW." Cahfomt. Real £state PV1~2 Rr/MAX Estate Propertiti 863,000 hnp://www.r> California. Real Estate PV130il547 PJ11denUal c..!ifomiaRulty 750,000 http://www.ro Collforrua Real tM.ate P82l2S6 Coldw•ll Banker Best Realt.., 735,000 http:/fwww.,. Ohforma RN! Estate 512104026 The Real Estate GrOllp 710,000 http://www ... Califomia II.HI EstiKI! 512123702 KeUer WiUlarns Realty 1,138,000 http://www.r> caUform. Rul ES1ale Vl211671S ~er Williams PalGS Verdes 710,000 http://www.r> Wfornia Aeal Estate PV13001843 RE/MAX Est.at:e Properties 891.000 http://w-.r> Cal!fomlaReal Est•• PV13005021 Keller Williams Palos \lerdes 715,000 http://-.ro Cal!fornla Real httfe PVH010790 RE/MAX Ulate Propertie3. 73S,OOO http://www.ro California RN! Estillir:' PVU01492l RE/MAX Estate Properties 810,000 http:/t-.r· Callfotnla Rul bt.at:I SB13007431 Peters Realty Cente¥, lr>e 720,000 http://www.r> Califoml11 Real Est:.teo PV130209Sl KellerWiUiarns Palos Verdti 795,000 http://www.r> C.liforn1:a RN! Cstal• P\113029751 RE/MAX Estate Ptopertln 810,000 htlp:/fwww.r· California Rffl Est:lll• 5813029387 Keller Williams Rulty 710,000 http://www.r> callfomla Rul Esttie S11022150 Rc/Mail Execs South Say 690,000 http;//www.r> California Real htate PVl.3021290 PrudeMlal Califamla Realty 675,000 http://www.r. California RHI £stat• V12004479 RE/MAX EstMe Properties 615,000 tdtp://www.r> eallfom1a Rul Eit.-te S11152481 South Bay Homes 1.000,000 http://-.t· Callfomla R~ Estate V1203&'82 Ptudential Ciilifomla Reiky 1,088,000 http://www.t> callfornla Real EstMe V12058028 RE/MAX Estitle Properties 650,000 http://www.n C..llfomiaRQI Estate P820065 Atllltltk & Pac:lfic R•al EJtate 960,000 http://www.n C•lifomia Rul £stale 121S853& Michal Wyuyl.awski 1,100,000 hUp://www.ro Caldom1a Real Estale Vl.20G4718 RE/MAX Eslllte Properties 73S,OOO http://www.ro CRISNet MLS Fl2032455 Paul H•rbert 609,000 t.t.1p://www.r> eahfomlaRealEstaie V~ RE/MAX Estaie PropertlM 665,000 http://w-.ro Callfornia Real Esl.te Vl2062863 Caldwell Banktr P.V,/Sout.h B.a~ l.28S.OOO hTtpV/wwvd> c:..llfornia Real Estifte Vl2044683 RE/MAX Es1ate Properties l,t8S,OOO http://www.r>~ornij,RealEltateVll0790'J7 RE/MAXUtatePrope~ 680,000 http://www.r> Caltfomta Real Est ii• Sl.2077968 Keller William$ Re.ally 1,150,000 http://www r> California R-.al Enate V1U60S77 RE/MAX Estate Propertlti 1,050,000 hnp://www.t> Califom!aftt:al Estate WU112694 EMERALD REALTY,INV.INC. 1,878,000 hltp://www.r> California Real Estate Vl2Cl57773 RE/MAX Estate Properties 1.200.000 hnp;//www.r> Cilllfomla Rul Estatt V12003837 R£/MAX.btae Pr0pertin 2,160,000 hup:jjwww.rtdfln.com/CA/Rancho-Palos·Verdt:$/9-Dlomonte-Ln.'J01.7S/home/77~602 950.000 hUp://WW..r> Callfomla Real Estate VU062119 Keller Wiiiiams Palos Verdes 915,000 http;//www.ro Califoml& Real Estate 512041646 (na.oo Beach Reel Estate 985,000 http://www.ro C..llfornla Real Estate Hl20l5375 ReMax 2000 Realty 698,000 hltp://www.ro (;allfomli Real Eshte .!>120022SS PrudenU~ California Realty 865,000 http·l/www.r Califontta l\e:al E~1a11• St2049739 Kallf!f Wllhal'n$ Realty 900,000 hllp://W#W.ro CRISNet MlS F12007209 General Realty Group.Int. 773,000 ht1p;//www.11 Callfom1a Rell! Euate Vl.203279S REJMM Estale Properties 935.ooo http://www.r• C.llfomi1Rea/ Estlle Vl.20403!17 Ptudential callfornl.ioRealty 165,500 http://www.r•Callfomiai!.e.al Estat• \112054653 Rf/MAX Estate Propeniti l,lSS,000 htlp;//www.•· C..hfornl• Real Es1ate 512003543 Ke!leJ Will!Mm Realty 900,000 http;//www.r-Callfomla Rt-1! Estate Sl2055296 11.£/MAX Est&te ~parties 981,000 http;/Jwww.ro Cahfonua Real Es1ate V1207340'3 Coldwell Banker-l>V/Sch. CJciel. 700,000 http://www.r• californla Rut Eslatt 11.1201412 K~ller WIHi.lrl'I$ Realty 687,500 http;//~.rocallforruaRull:Slai:eV12014601 RE/MAA Estill• Propertie 1,340,000 hltp:/J~WW.r> California RHI Estate Vl.2031784 RE/MAX Estate Propertlti l,7:l0.000 hnp://www.n California Re.ti Estate 512006677 5hor&Wood Reali OB 835,000 http://www.r> Qillfornla Re•t Est it• S120!11l05 Re/Max bets RPV 1.1su10 hup://www.r· California Rut htate Vll04S2"3 RE/MAX Eslata Propertll!S l,OS0,000 http;//www.I' Oillforn!.1 Real £slate 512041162 Rc/Mu fxKS Redondo Beach sss.ooo http://_,,. ... Californl:a Roi ES1ate 5U069181 KeUer W1lllilm$ &tm au~ 1,100.000 hUp://www.ro c~bfom1i Re.al Estatl' ¥12078811 Coldwell BankC!r·PV/Bch. Oties. l,150,000 hUp://w-.r· Cillfornta Real Estate Vl.20796!3 RE/MAX Es1ate Properties C - 3 8 P;i:.tSale Singlehm1lyResidtmtial P;i:.tSale Singleh:m1lyRuidenual P;ri;tSale SingleF.amdyResident1al PastSale Singlefam1lyR~identi.;al PastS.!e SmglefamifyResident1al Pasls.te Sioglef.milyResidentlal Pint54le srnglefarnllyResidential PaslSale SingleFamllyResidenllal Pasts.ile SinglehmllyReskantlal Pzi.1Salo11 SinglehmllyResidentiM Past~ Singlehm1lyResidenlial PastS.11 S.11jlefamilyRnodctnt1al PastSah! Slnglol:FamilyResidentl<li Pa$1.Saloe SinglefamolyRes1dent1al PastSale SinglefamilyRll$idenU.al Past5ale Sil!BlehmilyResldential P"5tS1Je SlogleFamllyResidentiill Pasts.le SinglefamllyResklenllal Pmsale Singlef;m><lyflesidenUal Past sale Single Family fl6idential Past5ale Singleh1n1lyR~ent1al PastS.le S.nglef;imilyResidentlal P.t Sale Smgle Family Residential PastSalr SiflilefamilyR.esklentlal Past5ale SingleFamilyftf!$identlal P.tStSat. SinglefamityR.e!Jden1ial PastSale Slnghl!hmllyResidentlal PastSale SlngleFarnilyResidentlal Pas1Sale SinglefamitiResldenllal PaltSale Slnglefilff>tlyResid-.it1al P41Sl Sale Singh! f~ Rntdential Patsale SingleFanW,-Resldent1al Pai;t5.lh Singlefamlly-Rakkontlal Past$ale Slngl..f-myResidentlal PastSale Singlef".anulyflflidentlal Pi1$l Sale Single family Residential PastSale SiflCleFamllyResklential P~ »le Sinc)e Family Rmdentlal PastSale Sinc)eFamllyRftldenual Pasts• Sir.de Family Residenu.al PastSale Sin&leFamllyflesldantlal P.t Sah Sinpo family R!SldenU.al Past~ SinglefamllyResldentlal PastSalti Sin&lefamlloii~ldential PastSale Singlefamityllesldel"ll.lal PadSale Sln&JeFiimllvR~tlal PastS..le SinglefamllyResldential PastSaJe SinglefamilyRe:.idential PestSM SingleF-myRftldemial Pa:stSai. SingleFamllyResi<Mntial Pmt sale Single Family Residential Past5.ie Slngiefall'lllyflesidential PmtSate SinglefamllyRo11Slden11.al. Pes1s.le Singh!Famllyftesidentlal. Pasts.Me Singlefarnilyllesldentl.al. Pm.1Sale Slnglefam!lyRnldentlal PauSale Singlefi1m1lyResrdentiat PctSale SinglefamtlvResrdentlal PastSale Singlef:iomilyResidentlal Pasts.le SinalefamrlyR115iden11.V PastSlle SinglefamilyRRSJd1111ll.al. PastSaloe SingleFam11-tResidentlal PastSale Singlef:;mnlyResichmtial Past~le SinglefamilyResldenll.11 P.utSale SineleFaml\yResiclential Past.sale S.ngleFamilyResidential Pas!Sale SinglefamllyResldenual Pasts.le Slngk!FamliyResrdential Pzt!ialeSi·F~fl-s~!>llal PastSlle SinalefamlhoResklentlal PastSale Singlef111'1'1llyResidenUal P25t~le SingleFot1n1lyResiden1ial Pas!Sale StngleFamilyResidential Pil$lSale SinglehmilyResidenual Pastsale SingleFamilyResldent1al Pa5tSale S.nglefarndyRtildent1al P&\ts.le SinglefamilyResklent1al Pll5t5ale SinglehmllyResklential JllOSt Sale Single Family R<ISl<Mntial Pan Siie Single family Residential Pest Sale Smgle fam;tv hsidential Pa5t~lt SinglefamllyResidentl<ll P.»tSale Singlefam<lyReidential 30073 AVE Rancho Palos Vefde. CA 15 GOlOff Rancho Palos. VerdeJ CA 64S4tEBUflanthoPalo$Vetde!. CA 6805 AlTA Rllmho Palos Verdes CA 6893 \/All' Rancho Pal~ Verdei. CA 30322 Rho Rancho Palos Verd.?!. CA lOlSOMA' flaodto Palos Verde$ CA 30317 RH( Rancho Palos Verde$ CA 2818 COlT R.aSKho Palos Vtr~ CA 6520VIALll.am;hoPalosVerdti CA 28211 HA2 Rancho Palos Verdes CA 27621 Tan Rancho P.:tlos Verdes CA 30907 RUE RallCho Palos Verdes CA 2NuvolaCRanchoPalol!Verdes CA 4121 MIR.II Rancho P•I~ Verdel. CA 30730Vi.I Reh Pak>$ Vrd CA nu BE.RR RMlcho Palos Verdes CA 6415VlaC RandioPalosVerdM CA 61 ROOON Rancho Palos Verdes CA 29016 cu• Rancho Palos Vetdtt CA 17 MUSTA Rancho Palos. Verdu CA 1909 JAYS! Rancho Palos Verdes CA 2120 RON! Rancho Palos Vet~ CA 29500 OCE R<lncho Palos Venles CA 3232SSEA RandtoPalosVerdes CA 31008 HA ... Ran<:ho P<olos \ler<ks CA J482NEW llanchoPalo$Verdes CA 7460AU01 Randio Palos Verd~ CA 3Vi.iO.UCRancltoPalos.Vudn CA 2029 TllUC Randio Palo$ Verde. CA 2156 West Rancho p.,m Verdes CA 31018 MAI Rancho Palos Verda. CA 27936ALV RalKhoPalosVwdin. CA 28951PaltR .. nchoPalosV8f'des CA 2146 \IAN Rancho Palos Verdes CA 1501 West Rancho Palos. Verdes CA 28&S2 RW Rancho Palos Verdes CA J2S5 SPAR Randio Palos Verdes CA 2435ColtlR.anchoPalosVe1des CA 2418COl.T R'll'KhoPa:IM Verdes CA 27961PAl.. flanchoPalo:.Verdes CA 5657MISf IUnchoP~Verde!. CA 5454 EAU• Rancho Palos Verclti CA J84145EA Palos Verdes Penimula CA 68300tES Rancho Palos Verde CA 6620 LOO: Ratld>o Palos Verdes CA 2171lHA"RaochoPalosVef(I~ CA 28058 BRA Rancho Palos Verd. CA 6624 EOOlt P111os Venles Penim.ula CA 6837VERt:flaochoPaloliVerdeJ CA 5814 SCOT R.aoeho Pitlos Verde$ CA 2700 VIA" hi«. Verdes Estatn CA &415 SEAS R.anci>o Palos Vecde$ CA 288Al BLY R:andio Palos Verde. CA l0039 VIA Rancho Palos Vet des CA S MELA ln Rancho Palos Verde5. CA 1915 HOM Rancho Palos Verdes. CA a CHERRY> Rancho Palos Verdes CA 28805 CO\ Rancho Palos Vu des CA 28318P0"RatidioPaloi;Vtrda. CA 25 CRESJV. flandw Palos Verdes CA 6410.sfA ( !UndloPalosV&rdes J2200VAL RanchoPalosVude 4362 EXUL Rancho Palos Verdes CA 6750VERt Rancho Palos Verdes CA 6462 PARk R1111cho Palo$ Verdes CA 28033 Lori. Rancho Pak.is Verde$ CA 6823 FAIRl Rancho Palo$ Verdes 29362 WH Rancho Palos Verda 2892Q PINI flancho Palo$ Verdes CA 27131 WO flandw Palos Verdes CA 313JMAR ll;mchoPalo$Verdes CA 28830 CRE Rancho Palm Verda. CA 29520 OCI Rancho P;Hos Vefdes CA 6528 MAO Rancho Paio$ Verde$ CA 7088CIUS Hantho Palos Verdes 29UlGOl.Ranc.hoPaJo:sVerdn 30136VFA flanchoPalo:sVerdes. 1016HED<Ranch<>ratosverdes. CA 16 HAR8Ch Rolling H~ls Es1ate5 CA 30420 VlA Rancho Palos Verdel. CA Und~close Rancho P~ Vtl'des CA 6753 VERt Rancho Palos Vefdes CA 90275 90275 779900 90275 3500000 9Ctl7S 1649000 90275 115900:> 9027S 90275 1399000 90275 1&75000 90275 ll49CXXJ 90275 1175000 9027S 1225CO:l """ 90275 90275 90275 """"" 90275 90175 875000 9027S 929000 90275 645COJ 90275 699000 90275 859000 90275 uooooo 90275 959000 90275 1135000 1"'900 90275 90275 SSlOOO 90275 639000 90275 3996000 90275 n1000 90275 S49000 90275 90275 879000 90275 90275 90275 ~ 90275 1225000 90275 720000 90275 1099000 90275 1989000 90275 1G80000 90275 750000 90275 1095000 90275 899000 90275 l25CXIXI 90275 U2SOOO 90274 2500000 W275 t57500J 90275 98SOOO 9027S 21'99ll00 90274 1089000 90275 5£8500 ,.,,. """""' 90275 1485000 90275 669000 g(l2]5 1198000 90275 3399000 90275 919000 90275 1350000 90175 749900 90275 944900 90275 """"' 90275 U79000 90275 1249000 90275 """"" 90275 960000 90275 9~ 90275 1095000 90275 1089000 90275 1149000 90275 1679000 90275 ll9!!000 .. 90275 2l9SOOO 90275 885000 90174 1699000 90275 1125000 90275 679000 90275 1075000 4.S " 3 2.5 2.5 2.5 vs L75 4 lS 5 2.5 L75 ' 275 55 1.75 2.25 1.75 25 2.S 4 '·" L7S 275 3.75 '·" 25 5.25 '-" ' 4.75 ' ::1.75 l 275 L7' 2.75 2.S l.S 2 225 ' 2.25 3.25 2.75 5.7S 2.5 3.75 2.S 2.25 3670 1'01 5551 '"" 2720 '"' 28!>1 ,.., 2584 "'' mo -4244 2314 3260 ,.,. 22'6 214• "n 27l6 2-052 -""' '"' 495!1 .. ,, 1467 12911 1434 '2U 2101 "" 2168 1'58 2"36 2'1> 3941 "'" ""' 2135 '"' 2875 2317 2143 .... 2788 254S """ ,.... 2056 -3017 1011 1569 "'" 1746 """ 1672 "" 2875 ,. .. 2700 '"' 2420 ,.., 2128 2707 """ """' 3974a ""'' 20013 UJ057 is780 15'23 23124 U424 "" ,,., "'" 24925 """' 71l01 "" 14317 13562 ""' 104'8 5817 JOSl 11024 1714 6773 217116 132>0 ,., .. 42681 10lli 10118 "'"' '""' 9516 7316 7762 7Ul J85S4 u ... 9311 8712 10001 14556 """' """ "'"" 12077 ·""' .. ,. 7412 m .. . 9231 """' 21544 '"" '"" 1"021 9512 113111 21661 103la 10625 1973 J.9S9 21)()2 1978 ,,.. ,,., ""' 1'62 ""' 1936 ""' "'"' ""' 1954 ,, .. 1%1 1"56 1"6 ""' 1'158 "'"' ""' "'" 1963 1971 1970 1999 l006 l!lSO 1!>55 -1%2 "'" J.%7 1914 ""' 19S!l ,.., 19SS "" "" ""' 1971 1965 ,... ,,,. ,.... ""' 1912 1987 1910 """ 2012 """ "'"' 1951 "" 1958 ""' '"'' ""'' 1972 ,. .. ""' 1967 1966 ,.,. "" """ l!J6.I 1970 1%9 ,.., ..., ""' 1'64 1!112 3 Garage 2 Garage 'J Garage ,....,, 3 Garage 2 Garage 3Garage 2 G.r.1ge 2 Garage 2 Gauge 2 Garage 2Gar~ 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 Gar.age a Garage l 2 Gafil&e 2 Gataae 2 Garase aGar~e 5 G•age 3 Gar;ige 2 Gan11a 2 Gara;ge 3 Gill"llge 2Garage 2 Garage 2Gartt111 lGar• 2 G...-age 2 Garage 5 Gwage , ...... 2Garqe 2 Garage ' ...... 36¥~e 4 Garage 2Gaf~e 2 Gar;ice 2 Garage 2 Gaf;age 3 Gariltle 3 Garill!e 2Gari1ie 2G<irilge 2 Garage 1 3 G;irage 3 Garage 3 Garage 3 Garace 2 Garage 2 Garage 2 Garage 3 G¥age 2 G.rage 3 Gafage 4 Garage 4 Garage 2 Gatilfle 2 Garace 2 Garap 2 Garage 2 Gitr:q.e 3 Gill"age 2 GitraJlll 3 Garat1e 2 Garage 3G..rage 3 Garage 2Garage 2 Garage S/3/2012 S 5/10/20115 5.'10/1012 S 5/10/2012 S S.'30/2012 S 6/l/2012 s 6/26/2012 s 6/18/lOU S S/3/ID1"2. S 8/l/2012 s 4/25/2013 s 4/23/2013 s 4/26/2013 5 4/23/20ll s B/19/2Q12 5 11/2/2012 s 4/15/2013 s 3/28/2013 s 2128/lOU S 3{6{2013 s J/8/2013 s 3114/2013 s 3/12/2013 s 2/1/2013 5 9120/2012 s 2/25/lOU S 3114/lOU 5 B/30/2012 S 10116/2011 s 8128/2012 s 8121/lOU S 8131/2012 s 9/S/2012 s 41l3/20U 5 l/31/2013 s 1131/2013 s 2fl/2013 s 2/1/2fJ13 s 2/4/2013 s 2121/2013 s 2121/2013 s 1/2S/1.013 S 1/25/2013 s 1/28/2013 s ll29/l013 s 1/29/2013 s 1/30/2013 s 216/"IOU S 21612013 5 'J/6/201J s 2/19/2013 s 2/20/2013 s 2/20/2013 s 4/10/2013 s 4/26/2013 s 4/26/2013 s 4/"Z!'J/2013 s 4/29/201.'J s 4/30/2013 s 7/25/2012 s 7/16/1.012 s 6/6/2012 5 6/512012 s 1/17/2012 s 1/18/2011 s 6/20/2012 s 7/25/2012 s 7/2U/2012 s 7/27)2012 s 7J'l,7/20U.S 611/2012 s 10/30/2012 s 10/31/20U S ll/14/2012 s 11!20/2012 s 11/20/2012 s 1216/2012 s 12/3/2012 s tl/17/2012 s 12/18/2012 s 12/18/2012 5 12,113/2011. s U/18/2012 S 1.623,000 http://www.r• Callforn1a Real Estate VU014941 Peni11511la SOtheby'~ lnt'I Rltv 782,000 Mtp://www.,.. callfomia Real Esute il2031Ul E11trett Real Estate Group 3.JS0,000 httv://w-.r. Calif0tn1a Real Esiate Vl2003667 Pemmu1a Sotheby's lnt'I Rlty 1.590.000 http://www.r• QllJfornia Real f$1ate Vl2035537 fl[} MAX Estate Properties 1.125,000 http://www.r• Clllifotnll Real Estate VU00!1896 KeHei Willlam1 Palos Verdff 1,150,000 http://www.r.dfln.com/CA/Rantho-Pak>s.Verdes/30322·Rhon.-Or-9027S/home{1744096 1,316,250 http://www.r· California Real ht ate VU019845 Prudernial Callftmlla Realtv 1.~.000 hn.p://>NWw.r• callfornla Re.I Estate Vl2°"844!1 Coldwi!:ll Banker P.V./SOuth Say 1.000,000 http://www.r. C1llfom1a Real ht ate V12050023 RE/MAX btatl! Properties 1.110.000 http://www.r. California fleal bt•e Vl2047554 Penlluul;, Sotheby's ln11 Alty l,225.000 hnp://www.r. California Real EstaU PV1303S912 RE/MAX Estate PropMles 690.000 http://www • .-..Hin.tom/CA/bnd>o.Palo5-VerdB/2762l·Tarras.0!'·90275/home/77311.96 t.3.S0,000 http://www.ri California R11al htllor PV1301030l Pn1denual CallfomraRealtv 1.550.000 http;//www.ttdfin com/CA/Ranclio-Palos.Verdu/l:·Nuvoi.Ct-90275/ttom./7141070 t.065,000 http://www.t> Callfomi.. Rul Estate 12·576427 Mllb Rflilky of California 1,300.000 hUp;//w-,r.dfln.com/CNRch-Pa'°'""Vrd/30730-Vi.-L .. Crttt•90275/horne/7751J300 949,000 htlp://www.P Ca!lfomla Real btatl! PV13034SS8 RE/MAX Estllte Properties 765.000 http;//-.lfffln.mm/CA/Rancho.P&los·\ferdes/6415-Vi•Canad>90275/home/7733184 ~.000 httpJ/www.r> Califomla R11al Estate 511093900 Leacrest Realty 910.000 http://www.r> OUSNet MLS 1'12097125 C".en1ury 211>.11 Move 1,aoo.000 http://wWW.r> California Real £state Vl210l-433 Rf/MAX Es late Properties 6..t.S,000 http://www.r> Calltom1a Real EsU1t~ 58130.18056 R(/MAX Estate Pmperues 680.000 http://_....,, California Reill Uate 5813019485 Keller Wfllams Realty g4{1,000 http://_...J. Callfotnlil Real E~tate PV12l.522.L9 Prudential Callfo~ Re;ilty 1.100.000 hltp://~.n c:.lifomla Real Eswt:e Vl.2Cl44CM9 RE/MA.IL Estate Properties 959,000 http://W#W.n Callfoml11 Real Estate PV12139523 Ke!lCI Wiiiiam!. Palm Verdes 1.060,000 http://www.r> Callfornlll Real Eslatl! Si05ll6 ZlpReaity Inc 1.929.000 httpJ/www t> C11Ufornla Real Estale V1209S082 P.rudrlntlal Cahfoml.a Realty l,&50,000 http://www.redfin.wm/CA/~Palos·Veid6/~Vla--Del·CleJo.90275/home/122Cl207 551.000 http://www.r> Cll!forma Meal Estala Vl1060299 Pl'U!k<ntl~ CIHfomla Realty &22,000 http://www.r. Callforn11 Rut Estate 1112083499 RE/MAX EstM.e Prr;1pertil!S 3,81S,COJ http://www.r> Cllllforllla Real Est.at a Vl2060G93 Petul'ISUlilSotheby's lnt'I Rli:y 729,000 ht1pJ/www.f' California Rqal Est.ie Sl2088538 Keller Wiilams Realty 3,875,000 http://WWV1.,.dtin.«HTl/CA/R11neho-ra1os.verd6/289SH'alm.-Verdes-Dr·E·90275/home/i738!M6 745,000 http://www.r• California Rval Es~.tl! V121060S4 COidweil Banker·PV/Bch. Cities S35.000 http://,,,_.,, C.llfomla Real EState SB12l313Dl Home Team Meetly 841,000 http://WNW.r> Callfomla RHI Esuitr S812129046 Atlantk & Pilltlflc lie.ti Estate 860,000 "tittp://www.,. Callfomla Rtal Estate V12085361 RE/MAX Estate Propert;e,. !175,"4£5 http:l/VNIW.rtdfln.com/Cf./Rancho-Palt>J·Ve<"dfl/l4JS.Coll·Rd-90275/home/77J2979 885.000 hUp:/}WW«.P California Real Estate 510095443 Keller W1HAmS Realty 1,040.000 hrtp://www.r-Callfoml• RHI Estate S121l.8856 Re/Max Eltea South Bay l.130,000 http://www.r> ~omia Real Estne V1210312S PV Brokerap Int 690.(XXI hnrr.}/WW«.r> Ci!Ufornla Real bl ale Sl21C979'J Keffer Wllllami flealty 1,.080,000 http://www.r> Callfomla Real Eslate SB12146751 RE/MAX Estate Prop&nles 1,B75,000 http:/fwww.r> c.allfomla Real Eslale PV12142241 Kell..-Williams Palos Ve~ 1,500,000 http://WWW.r• CafffomlaReal Esta!• PVUJ.54674 RE/MAX Estate PTDPMllff 150,000 http://www.,.. California Real bl ate .5696811 .simpl• Realty Inc 1.060.000 http:J/www "CaldofT!la Real Estate v12on6ts Pen1n01ul11 Properties 899.000 hUp://-.n Califomiall.11al Esbte PV12153712 Swen.seas Investment, Inc. 1.150,000 http://www.,. Callfomui R•~ ht ate S8l213937l Rex Really Company 1,090,000 http://www.r· California fl.HI Esta!• P\112133701 RE/MAX Estau Properties 2,260,000 http://w-.ro Ctlllforn1.1 Real Estfie V12ll31J!14 RE/MAX £stall! Propertlti 1,525,000 http;}/www.r. Cllllfomla Real Estate Vl2122130 RE/MAX Estate Properties l,OS0,000 http-.//www.r. California 11. .. 1 £slate 5813035990 Kelle! Williems BellCh Cities 2.700.000 http://www.,. callfornla Ru! E'late $11044832 ShOJ"eWood Realtor5 INC 1.125,000 http://w.JW.r> California Ru! Estllte PV13045065 Peninsula SO!heby's Inti Rlty 560.000 hf.trr.J/www.,.. California Real Ellate 5813005365 The fleal Estate Group 225.000 http://www.r> Califomlll Reill £.!.tiite P\112138509 Kl!ller W1lbamsjlA H1rbor 1,562,888 http://www.r. C..Qfornla Real Est.ate 121729'6 Real Estate Mortgage Exchange 669.000 httrr.//W-.r> Cakfomla Meal Estate Sl2fl'0001 C-21 Union Realty 1.250,000 http;//www.r> callfoml.a Real Estate V11153822 RE/flMX Eslate Propetlie!. 3,000,000 hltp://www.,.. California Real Estate 511143342 Shorewood Realtors 920,000 http://www.r> California Real Estate Vl201335& Coldwell Bariker P.V.}South Bily 1.300,000 http://www.r> Califomla Real Estate stll065U Keller Willlams Realty 170,000 http://WNW.r> CIUSNet MLS 1'12077124 Prime Blinker flealty Inc. 995,000 httfh//-.r> Cillifo•n<a Real Estilte Vl2052416 Ptudenli.i Cilliforma Rt1lty 910,000 http://www.r> California Real blate Sl.20512:16 Shorl!'IVOOd ReilltOll INC 1,169,350 http://w-.r> Callfotnl.l flu! Estate Vl2023172 1,200,000 hf.1p://www.r> ClllfornlaRtal Estate P821972 850))XlhttpJ/www .... Cal!fornlaReaJE5tat•S102388 925,000 hllp:/,_.r. CliliforniaReal Eslale Vl2046S61 900.000 http://www.r. California Real htate 512091172 1.095,000 http;//WWW.f' Callfom1i1 RHI Estate VUllllllJ 1, 120.000 irtlp://www.r· Cabfom1•Real Estate Vl2119556 Keller Wtlliams Pall» Verdes ReaJEstateXperulnc. VerandaHotne!, Coldwell Ban"-r P.VJ5ou1h Bav Kel!e1WiU111mBead\Ckles RE/MAXEstatePropertlf'$ Coldwell Sanker P.VJ5outh Bay 1,155.000 hl.tp://www.t> California Real Estate V12121991 Pornmsula SOtheby's lnl'I Rlty l,64!1,000 http-.}/www.r• Califorrmi Real Est.ille PVU1283.33 Cuidw•ll 8anl!.tr-PV/lkh. Cities 1.150.000 http;//-.r> California Re.I Estate Vl.2125280 RE/MAX f.state Pr open~ 2.100,000 http://www.r• Callform• RNI Estate \112019368 RE/MAX. Estate Propertie!. 81'0,000 http://www.r-Caltfornia Reill Estate Vl2Ul.251 RE/MAX Estate Properties 1,650,000 Mlp://_,,...,_,.. callforma Roral Estate Vl.2045665 RE/MAX. Estate Proper!~ 1.070,000 http://~ t> Callfomia RN! Estate SUOS3438 Keller Williams flealty G19,COO http://www.r> Olifomi• Re:JI Es131or VU081153 The RnlEsuite Group 990.000 http://www ,.. California Re.! Estate V12110242 Coldwell Banlttr·PV/Sch. Cilie~ C - 3 9 PastSale SmgleFam1fyResident1al PastSale SmcleFamd'1'Reslden1ial PaiotS.a11 SincleFa1ndyl!.aiden11al PastSale SmgleF.arnil\oResidf!nual PastSale Singh!FamllyReslden1i.lt Pasts.ale S1nglehmilyResident1al Pa:stSale Slnglefamllyflesidential PastSale S1111leFamilyResldentJal PastS.ale Sln&iefamilyResldentlal PastSale SlnglefamilvRe:sldential Pasl~SincJoeFamllyResidential P;&1.Sale SlnglefamilyResidenti.al Pasts.ie SinglefamdyRestdential Pa:slSa!e SinaleFanulyResidenttal PastSale SlnglefamilyResidential Pa:stSale SinglefamilyRR$1®nlial PastS.ale SingleFamllyRl!SidenUal PastSale SmglefamllyResKlent1al Pasts.le SingleFamilyRHklentlal PastSille SmglehmllyRHidentiill Pansale SlngkrF•milyRHidentlal PastSale SmcleF.-lyResKl•ntlal PastSale SmglefamUyReidential PastSaleSlnglolFamtlyllHfdlntlal P115t5al• Smgl1FamliyR11Sidentlal Pastsale SlngleF&mllyResldential PastS.le SlnglefarnilyllHidenlial P.astSale Slng.leFamilyResidenl1al P•tSall! Slngll!F..milyResldential P.astSall Sin&llFamilyR.sident1al PastSale SingkrFam~llesidem:tal Paatsale SlnglefamdyResident•al Pi1$t5;tle 5ln1leFi1mllyResldenUal PastSale SingleFmnllyResldentlal PaatSale 51ntkrFamllyResidenual P.astSale SlnglefamilyRe:sldential PaitSale SlnglefamityResklential Pasts.ti SlngleF.arnffyRHidenUal PastSale SingleFamilyResidential P.ztSale Stn&leF.mulyRHKM!nt1al Past.Sale Slngh!FamilyResidentlal PastSakt Townbous• Pansa~ T"""nhouse Pan Sate Townhouse Pait Sale Townhouse PastSale Townhouse Pzi;tSale Townho!Ae Pa:i?Sale Townhouse Pa:uSale TCM111hous• Past Sale TCM"nhoir.;e P.astSale Townhouse Past.sah Townhou!e P.astSale Townhouse Past5o1h T<'.IWnhouH PastSale Townhou$e Pastsafe Townhouse PilltSale Townho- Past sall' Townhome PastSale Town~ Past Saltt Townhouse PastSale Townhouse Pnt s.IC!' Townhouse PastSale Townhouse Past.sale Townhouse PastS.ale Tgwnhow,e P1111Sale Townh01,.1Se PastSale Townhouse Pasts.le Pans.:ile Townhouse P.astSale Townhouse P.astSa~ Townho1,.1Se Past5ale Townhouse P;&1.Sale Town~ PastSale Townhouse Past Sar. Townhouse Pa:stSale Townhouse P.nt5ale 285llHA2Ri1nchoP<11klsVerdes. CA 90275 l19SOXI 4 2.25 2485 12280 l96l 3 Gan•ge U/W/2011 S 1.215,000 h1tp;//www.r.ca1ifornu1RealEstatePVUl39417 RE./MAXEslateProperties 21HOftSE!RollingHUk.ht.ltes CA 90274 1649000 4 3.25 4036 14731 1919 4 G.iltate U/24/2012 S l,640,000 http://www.r-Ohforni.aRulhlateVUU1984 ColdweltBankerP.V./South&y 2 TOPRAll R<11nd>o Pakis Verde. CA 90275 899000 3 2 2261 244807 1960 2 Ga: age 12126/2012 S 1.265,000 http://www fl Cilllforn1il /le:tl Eslille S12100l79 kell111 WtUlil1'IS Bud! Citiors 1933 VALL Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 689CXXl 4 2 1798 8511 1959 2 Gaiage U/29/l012 S 700,000 hn.p;Jlwww.r-Cahfom1a Rul Ealill.e P\112142045 Keller W1llianu/lA Harbor l909WeslR.11nchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 719(0) 5 3 2522 7338 1962 2 Garage 12/31/2012 S 703,000 http://www.flCalifom1aReaJEstatl!'SUU42Sa RealEstateWest 28315 CQI. Rancho P<1tos Verde,; CA 90275 899900 4 25 2212 6842 1971 2 Garage 12/31/2012 $ 950,000 ht1p;//www.r• CaUfom11 Real Estate SBU140924 Rt/Mu txecs Redondo Beach 28704CO\RanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 998000 4 3 2639 954! 1956 2 Gar~ge 1212&/2012 $ 998,000 http;//www.r·l:allforn1aRea!Estll(ePV12139470 PenlnsulaSotheby'slnt'IRlty 420C£AN.RanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 1690000 6 3.25 3670 19338 1%3 3 Garage 11/29/2012 $ 1,610,000 http;//www.r·CallfcmlaReal£statePV12l31ll4 PenlnsultSotheby'51nt'IR!ty 3 Moonmt; Randie Pa/0 Verde$ CA 90275 4 3 2411 1962 11/20/2012 $ 1,350.000 trt1p://www.mifln.com/C.AJRarn:ho-Pal0·Verdi!5)3·Moonmist·Ot-90275/homefl744364 fillOSCOTRanehoPalcsVer~ CA 90275 99SQXI 4 3 2374 9022 1964 2 Gar_,e 11j23/20U $ l,008,000 http://www.f'CallfornoaRealhtill.eV12122252 PerunsulaSotheby'stnt'IRlty 29000f1RlRand>oPa~Ver~ CA 90275 1035000 4 2.75 2166 8361 1967 3 Garage 11/27/2012 S 1,020,000 http://WWW.f'Callforni.aRea1UtiteV12116249 RE/MAXESlat~PtoparUes 91 MAAGL IWlcho P;;ilo$ Ver~ CA 9027$ 5999000 4 6 7800 57046 11191 4 Garage 5/3l/2012 S S,S00,000 http;//www.n California Rul Estate 512029Ul9 Shorewood l'lealton INC 41SANTA f\anchoPalmVe~ CA 90275 2199000 5 4 3841 18614 198!> 3 Garage 6/4/2012 S 2.000,000 h1tp://www.nc:.!iform1RulhtateV12013456 fl[/MAXblattPropertin 111SCflE5RanchoPalmVerdti CA 90275 1299000 4 3 2760 11984 l9G!> 3 GatOIRf 5/18/2012 $ 1,220,000 h1tp://www.r>Cal!fom111ReelEsti11.1!Vl2015971 ColdwetlS..nkerP.VJSouth~ 1301 VIA'-Rand>o Palo!. Verdn CA 9007S 999999 3 3 2211 102!7 1962 2 Garage 11/1/2012 S 1,020.000 hUp:}/www.fl Californl1 Reil hllltt Vl2120432 Coldwltfl Bllnluir·PV/Bdl. Cilia 30327GMll.mdtoPillosVerdm. CA 90275 710000 3 2 . .ZS 1874 11587 1964 2 Garage 12/ll/2fll2 $ 700,000 h1tp://www.r•C.llfomlaRetlhtilltS8121495Ul ExcelFundln&R.E.S.,lnc 6003 BE.AC ~ncho Palos Ver~ CA 90275 990000 3 2.15 277& 44.53 1990 2 Gara1e-9/11/2012 $ 970,000 http:/!w-,fl C:ilrfomla Real htate V1205596J RE/MAX bute Prope1u .... 451& EMl l Rafldig Palos Ver~ CA 90275 lOSOOOO 2 2 1980 21721 1962 2 Gara.11e GIS/2Dl2 5 1,050,000 hllp://www..ri Califomla Real Estate Sl.mo266 Re/Mu El!eQ; RPI/ 2049SUA?-RanchoPalosVenJti CA 90215 770000 3 1.75 1584 10159 1959 2 Gwa1l' 9/t7/2012 S 77-0,000 http:/Jwww.r0 CallfomlaRHIEstlilleVU0917SO RE/MAXEstatePropenle~ lOCRES™RanthoPalosVet~ CA 9027S 1495000 4 3.S 3SU ll.353 1960 3 GMage &11/2012 5 l,547,000 h1tp://www.flCallf'ornlaRul&1ateV12039268 RE/MAXEstateProperti5 165TIRRUIRllm:hoPalosVerdti CA 90275 737200 3 1.75 1955 1 Garage-9/18/2012 S 650,000 http://www.,..Calfloml.aRealEn1te5120699l8 Re/MaxEllecsRl>V 6711 klNG Rancho Palos Verde. CA 90275 118.9000 S 3.25 17"8 7480 1971 2 Garag• 9,"13/2012 S 1,105,000 hllp://www.n Callfornl• lleal btat• S12097922 Cal Pro Ra*'ty, Im.. J026UO\IRandJoPalosVerdes CA 90275 969000 4 3 2478 7536 1%3 2 Garage 9,'18/2012 $ 950,000 http://www.r.e.allfomlaRealhlal•V1209946ll KellerWllliams.Palo$Verde$ lOVIA DEl RandloPalos Verdes. CA 90275 2999000 5 4.S 6994 28357 1999 4 G~e 9/25/2012 $ 2,900,000 'nttp:/Jwww.n Callfomi.RealEst.llte Sllll4058 Shorewood Realtors INC 20 ONCHR Rolhng Hllh CA 90i74 2995000 3 2.5 3361 74S2fl 1973 3 Garage '9/20/2012 5 2,850,000 http-./{www.fl Cilllfomll Rul btate VU076474 Prud4fnti.I C:lllfomta Reall:y S276SllVlR.anc'noPalosVercfu CA 90275 82!'tOOO 4 2 2209 15794 1%1 2 (i;11t..ge !.,'19/2012 $ 815,000 http:f/www_nCalifotni.Rtta1EstateV1201G204 RE/MAXEstatePrcpert1es 27911LOfVR.anchoPalOsVerdes CA 90275 1249000 5 2.5 2440 12031 1966 3 Garage 6,'15/2012 $ 1,225,000 http://www.r-cattfort11aRe1IEsti11eVl2041674 ColdwtilBanketP.VJSouth8~ 4630BRO\RanthoPalosVer~ CA 90275 910000 6 3 2711 12000 1966 3 Gal'age lO/l0/2012 $ 860,000 http://www.fleaufomlaRNIEstateVUl.US68 Rod:yf~ld 4612 BRO\ Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 819100 4 1 2142 12850 1966 2 Gara,e 10/18/2012 S 820,000 hrtp://www.,.. California Real Estate V12070833 RE.IMAX Utate P1opertieJ 4912 OElA Rancho Pal0$ Vetdes CA 90275 865500 3 1.7S l.800 n:u 1966 2 Gar~e U\118/2012 S 8;l9,000 http://www.fl Cafifom1a Real ESlate SU074S6l Emu Wiiham Johnson 480SfAlC•RanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 a&SSOO 4 1.75 1834 11153 19':iS 2 Garage 10/15/2012 S l!lr.J,000 ht1p://W11Nt.f1Californi•RealEstilleV12111942 PnidemialCallfomiaRealty 27631WAIR;mc:hoPalosVKdes CA 90275 935000 4 2 1701 8o44 1959 2 Garage 1/24!2013 S 925,000 hllp://.....-..r-C.lifomoaRHIEstateS812lS0504 Re/Ma11Exealledondo8eitdi 4807BRO\RolllngHllbE:italti CA 90275 819000 4 3 2364 24916 1966 2 G11rage S/9{2012 S 857,000 http://wwvu0 Callfon>i•RMl£stateV12039a79 PenlnsulaSotheby'slnt'IRlty 4849BRO\RanthoPalosVerdes CA 90275 889000 4 3 2189 14440 1%5 3 Garagll!' 7/31/2012 $ 825,000 http://www.r-CallfonUaR.e•l£state11·S49461 R£/MAXMepG~p 5008 GOU Raotho P.;rlos VerdH CA 90275 899000 3 2.5 1896 13475 1967 2 Gar.a£"' S/3/2012 S 86S,000 httpt}/www.r• Callfomu Re.al Estate Sl.2063962 Cornerstone Realty 27525t.AA RanchoPalo$Vetde$. CA 90275 1049000 5 2.S 2386 966.l 1965 2 Garase S/8/2012 $ 1.035,000 hnp;//www.r•CallfotnaR1tal~ateSUGS.t564 keRerWllliam:sRulty 5222 SILVE Raotho Pahn Verde!. CA 90275 799000 3 t.75 1680 7238 lli9 2 ~ 12/13/1012 S 790.000 http://www.r• Callfon>Q Real &tall' PV1212JJ19 RE/MAX Estate Properties 21990BEE ff.Indio Pillo$ Ver~ CA 90275 949900 4 2.5 2447 SUD 1967 2 Gai-age 11/16/2012 $ 900,000 htlp://WWW.t• CallfanmRul Estill.e 512094417 Gokan WHI llealty 27614 WAl Randlo Palos Verde CA 90275 719000 4 1.75 1834 '7349 1959 2 Garage 11/30/2012 5 880.tXX> hltp:/lwww.fl Citlifomia Re~ Ellill.e Vl2l2566ll Coldwell Sanke/ P.V./South Bay 27433 t.AR Rancho Pales Ver• CA 90275 9:ZSOCO 5 3 2225 12764 l36!> 2 Gi1r;1£e 11/23/2012 S 710,00l hllp;//www r• Callfoml1 Real &tale Sl2086317 Home Team Realty 270l1Sll\IRand>oPalosVerd.s CA 902JS 1150000 4 3 2194 12935 1967 2 Gara&I! 8,129/2012 $ 1.150,000 http://www.r•C.lllifornlalleldhtat•Sl2038S44 COldweHBanl:.erRnldentlal 1729'0U>SAiltldloP.d0$Vetdel. CA 9027S 319000 2 1.5 930 fi9666 1974 2 Garage ll/19/2012 S 319,000 lmp://WWW.r•Callfom1aR .. l£S1.11tt1Sl2112464 KellefWIHlamsRealty 2!535 &EA Rarn::ho Pal0$ Verdes. CA 90275 329000 3 1.5 1274 1915 2 Garage 6/5/2012 $ 329,000 http://www.n Callfcmla. Re.I Estate VU144UJ RE/MAX btate Properties 21'904NorlhmdioPalosVerdes CA 90275 469000 2 l.5 1152 1913 2 GarOll!e ";/2/2012 S 4$5,000 hUp#www.r-Callfcrni•~E1UteV12031037 RE/MAXEstatePropetlles 88 HIUTOl llancho Palos VMcfu CA 9G27S 774000 1 3 2112 4691 1919 2 Garage 5,124/2012 S 750,000 http-.//-.fl C3llfom111 Rea! Eatate 51U52539 ~al Eslate Oulld, Inc. 6406RIOG RandtoPalo$Verde:I. CA 90275 699000 3 2.5 2219 1917 2 Garage 7/20/WU $ 660.000 http://-.r•CallfomiaReathtate512063988 Ho~Teamll.eally 21940Ric!IR.nchoPalo$Verm.s CA 90275 425000 2 1.5 1140 1973 2Gill'age 10;115/2011 S 420.000 h1tp:l/~.toS¥10fegoCount($R 1200lS644WholesaleDlrcctRealEstate 6400 Sf.AU Ft.ntho Palos Verder. CA 90275 765000 3 2.5 2712 1938 2 Garilge 6/15/2012 $ 755,000 hltp://www.,.. callfomla Real btllte Vl203S661 hH•r Wlll1enn Pal0$ Verdn S VIA SAN IW.ncho Pillo5 Verdes CA 90275 tlG9000 4 ~ 2309 5314 1989 2 Garag1> 4/24/2013 S 869,000 http://www.ro Callforniil Real £stall! 1Nl3034099 Reill Estate 8roker11&e Group 28028NorR.ant'noPOJMVerdes CA 90275 469000 2 LS 1152 3485 1973 2 Garagit 4117/lOU $ 479.000 http:f/www.t>CaltlorniaRealUUtePV13015461 Pellll\JulaSot'neby'slnt'IRlty 28000 R!Ot Randie Palos Verdes. CA 90275 559000 2 2 1465 sioo34 1915 :Z GM• l/~2013 S 572.500 http://www.t• Ciilifomla Real fmu PV12136SS4 Coldwell Banlt.er·PWlkh-OUei. 2800S R!Oi Rancho Palo$ verae,. CA 90275 495000 2 l.S 1140 272623 1974 2 Gati1£"' 4/lo/2013 S 475.000 hup://www.r• Callfor!IQ ~al Es1Me 58130101114 Ptvdential California Realty 27VIAWR.l!KhoP~Verde$ CA 90275 390000 l 1 1313 264946 1989 1 Garage 9/2&/2012 S 390,000 htlp://www.r·CallforniaR•albtateSU07.51189 Sfrv11ntR11MtyGroup l3VIASMRanehoP~Vvdes CA 90275 849000 4 2-75 2309 S314 1989 2 GMage 11/14/2012 $ 820,000 'nnp://www.t>CafffomlaRealEstateSU097175 PalmRHltyBoutlque 28353 Sou 11.antho Palos Verdes CA 90l75 479900 2 1.S 1152 419781 1974 2 Gai-• 8/21/2012 S 472,500 http://www.r> Callfomla Real Estere Vl.2066490 R£/MAX Estate Propen~ 23HIUTOIRanchoPalosVerdes. CA 90275 722500 2 2.5 1913 1219 1979 2 Gllr~ 8.131/2012 S 717.000 http://www.flCallfoml<11ReillE5tllleV12038306 ColdweUSankerP.V./SouthBay 2830S RIDo Rancho Palos Verdi!! CA 90275 696000 3 3 2219 753676 1977 2 Garage 8/30/10U S 678,000 l\ttp>J/www.r> Callh1mia Rut btate Vl2073387 Rf/MAX bt.lte Properties 20 Nonh S Rolling Hills Esmes CA '4>274 625000 2 2.25 1794 6581 1973 2 Gar;;ige 9f20/2-012 S 610,000 hrtp://www.t> C.lifornoa Ru! EstMe Sl20Sll259 Prudenti.i California Realty 2!13751NDRanc'noP.alosVe1dti CA 90275 949888 3 3 2943 11334 19A9 2 Gar.a&<! 10115/2()12 S 890,000 http://www.r-C:IUfomlaR1al£stateV~36 Coldw&IJBankerP.VJSouth~ 30ASPEN'RolllngHilbEsl.ile$ CA 90274 798000 3 2.7S 2184 1939 .1975 2 Garqe 4/::l/20U S 790,000 hltp://www.r•CallfomiaRulEstateS813001096 RE/MAXEsuteProperties 1618 STOI\ san Pedro CA 00732 399000 2 2.2S 1572 1916 2 Garage 1'25/2013 S 387,000 http://www.r-Callfmn~ Real Estate PVl21Sl288 RljMAX Utate Properties 1601 STOf\. Siln Pedro CA 90732 ~ 2 2.25 1307 161015 t91G 2 Garage 4116/2013 $ 399,000 http://WINl.nCallfomiaRe.al Estaie PVl.3030875 Prudentlill CaltfomJt P.e11ity 1722 OLDS Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 260000 ~ l 1200 191374 1974 2 G.arase 3118/:2013 S 295,000 http://.,,._,,.. callfonu Re:tl hi ate 121714ll PtC$~rltr Homti & Loans 29&341Sl.4R.andloPJ1csVardes CA 90275 639000 3 25 lS:U 38688 1985 2 Garage 6/8/2012 S 6~.000 hltp://www.r>Calitomi.al!.ealEst~eV120U204 SevenSl!llsln'/eStment,Jnt. G402SEAURanc:hoPalosVerde$ CA 90215 1150000 2 3 2474 3915 1'9!8 2 G.ar:iae S/16/20U 5 l,060,000 hUp;.//,,,_.,.callfmnl1Rul£stateV12032536 COldwellS.nMrP.V./Solllh~ &310 RIOG Rancho Palos Verdes CA 9027S S69IXl) 2 2 1533 520034 1975 2 Gara1e S/25/2012 S 540,000 'nttp://w-t> Cakfomta Ile.al Est au Vll).36SJO RE/MAX [state Proptrt~ 6312 RIOG Rancho Palos Vaule CA 90275 6491XX> 4 3 2005 520034 1975 2 Gilt age 6/13/2012 S 6S2,000 httrr.//www.fl California Real btate V1201'7756 RE/MAX btate Properties 17HJUTOllW.nchoPalosVerdes CA 902~ 199000 2 2 18S9 27S9 197ft 2 Garagl' 6/29/1012 S 799,000 http://www.riC..llfom11RtfiEs1..teV12066716 Coldwall&.nkerP.V./SouthB~ 28025 RIOI Rantho Palos Verdes CA 90275" 5390CO 3 3 1439 l78261 1913 2 G.atqe 1/3/2012 $ 525,000 trttp:/Jw-fl C.ilfmnl1 RHI Estate V12063S22 RE./MAX Estate Propertle$ 28137 RIO< Rancho Palo$ Vtrde!. CA 90275 540IXX) 2 2 1494 520034 1976" 2 Garaa;t 8/10/2D12 ~ 545,000 ht1p;//www.r• C.llfornla Reill Esute Vl2078083 RE/MAX EsUite Properties 6400 Rld!t Ranclto Pal<'.ls Ve<des CA 90275 3 3 2217 1917 4124/2013 $ 715,000 http://www.rtdfln.com/CA/fltm-ho.Palcs·\lerdn,1640Q.Rkfgebyme-Q-90275/unrt-104/homejJJ48979 28115 RIOI Rilndio Pill~ Verdes CA 90275 5259CO 3 3 1974 520034 1976 2 Garagt 7/30/2012 S SJl.(00 http;//w-.r· C.lifornit RHI Estate Sl2:0374.59 Shorewood R£ALTORS 28408 fl.IOo 11.mdto Pakis Verdes CA 90275 715000 3 2.25 zo&J 753676 1977 2 Garaae 1/25/2013 $ 690,000 http://www.r-California Real btate PV12142616 RE/MAX Estate Ptopertles l9 HILlTOI Rancho Paloi V~ CA 9<>215 695000 2 2.25 1948 1919 2 G.vagr-2{21/2013 S 700,000 http-J/-.fl Californl; 1!.ul Eslatr-P\113002247 Prudl!nUal Californla Realty llVIASAf~choPalosVerdti CA 90275 849000 4 2.75 2309 1989 2 Garage 7/7.&/2012 S 835.000 http;//w __ t>CalifomlaRnlEstateV12044347 R[/MAXUtataProptrties 28164 RIO< Rancho Pal0$ Vll•dti CA 9027S 429000 2 2 ll.52 419781 1S74 2 Garage 5/31/2012 $ 400,000 'nup://www.r• CR/SNet MLS fl2013444 Rodeo Realty 28215RIOIRanchoPalosVerdes CA 90275 575000. 3 2.5 USU 520034 1915 2 Garage 12/21/2012 S 575,000 hrtp://www-r>Cahform,RnlE!ilat•PVlll.32402 R[/MAXEs1.ateProp•rties Pa:stSale Townho1,.1Se 2J909fllOIR<lnd!oPaltnVeJde!o CA 90275 S99900 3 2.5 1418 ~755 1973 2 Ga.age 11127/lflU S '577,SOO hnp://www.r>CallfornlaRHlht.ateV12114008 Rl/MAXEs1a1.eProperties Past Sale Townhouse 286.SSVISt RanchoPalosVtfdes. CA 9027S 3 3 1436 197.5 11/19/2fll2 $ 428,000 ht1p:l/www.redfin.com/CA/R1ncho-Palos-Vierdes/286SS.Vista-Mader<11·90275/hom<!/7729864 PastS.ale Townhouse 28S03V151RandioPalosVerdti CA !IOJJS 415000 3 3 1455 238519 197S 2 Gar;;ige 9128/2012 S 415.000 http:l/www.,..(allfom!Jl!.ealESlll'!eVU100625 PrudentialCallfoml.aRllalty Pa$1.Sale Townhotll'e 290C£AN Rancho Palos Verde CA 90215 815000 3 2.25 2465 l.981 2 G11tajf! W~ll S B25,000 hltp://www.flCallfortuaRutEmiteV12035687 PrudentialCalllorn!aRealtv Pas.ls.le TownhoUje 28027RIO<RanchoP"'!o~Vtr~ CA 90275 574000 3 2.5 1595 3491 19'3 2 Gilfage 0:,/24/2.0U S 510,000 http;//WWW.r•Caflfomlal!.Hlhlale\'12033074 ColdwellBanlcerP.V./South8ay MEDIAN 2189 1966 $ 890,500 C - 4 0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT 6 C-41 NOTES: 1 BRICKWALK, LLC 655 • 683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE SUMMARY I. DEMOLITION OF (E) BUILDINGS & SITE II. LOT 1 -TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT Buildings & Basic Site Improvements MAY 2, 2013 Building Upgrades due to Slope Conditions/Location Slope Repair I Remediation Premium Ill. LOT 1 -MIXED USE BUILDING WITH GARAGE Buildings & Basic Site Improvements Slope Repair I Remediation Premium IV. LOT 2 -(E) RETAIL BUILDING & PARKING LOT GENERAL CONDITIONS !:>UBTOTAL Overhead & Profit Insurance Professional Liability Insurance Gross Receipts Tax Bond Sub Failure Inflation ALLOWANCE ALLOWANCE Contingency -Construction Contingency -Design I Owner PROJECT TOTAL 3.25% 1.00% 0.00% 0.19% 0.67% 0.00% 4.00% 2.50% 5.00% 384,331 SF@ 129,341 SF@ 129,341 SF@ 374,523 SF@ 46,512 SF@ 2.5 MOS@ 9MOS@ 12.5 MOS@ This proposal Is based on DAC's Standard Exclusions and General Conditions (Basis of Estimate) Page 1of13 $ 2.81 /sf $ 1,081,605 149.81 /sf 19,376,956 32.50 /sf 4,203,579 7,250,000 128.84 /sf 46,254,757 8,750,000 19.66 /sf 914,335 32,500.00 1,353,750 65,000.00 55,000.00 $ 91,184,982 2,963,512 941,485 160,671 826,855 3,843,980 INCLUDED INCLUDED $ 99,943,485 C-42 NO. DESCRIPTION BRICKWALK, LLC 655 -683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE SITE & BUILDING DEMOLITION MAY 2, 2013 QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION SECTION TOTAL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SITE WORK 1.001 Plans & Engineering NIC LS $ $ $ 2 1.060 Permits & Fees NIC LS 3 1.400 Testing & lnsj!!!Clion NIC LS 4 2.015 Protection • Fence 3,200 LF 5.00 16,000 16,000 5 Barricade at Deee Valle:t Drive NIC LF 6 Safet~ Administrator NIC MOS 7 2.070 Salvage 1 LS 2,500.00 2,500 2,500 8 2.045 Demo Assist 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000 5,000 9 2.199 Erosion Control 384,331 SF 0.25 96,083 96,083 10 2.198 SWPPP 1 LS 35,000.00 35,000 50,000 11 2011 Management Reguirements; QSP 3rd Pa!!:t ALLOWANCE 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000 12 2.050 Demolition -Ueeer Office Buildings (2 SIO!}'. buildings) 30,764 SF 5.00 153,818 703,692 13 Remalng Building Foundations 7,273 SF 2.50 18,183 14 Parldng Loi/ Site Area 66,469 SF 2.00 132,937 15 Lower Office Building on Deee Valle:t Drive (over Parking) 34,098 SF 9.00 306,878 16 Parking Lot / Site Area 33,438 SF 2.00 66,875 17 Misc. 1 LS 25,000.00 25,000 18 2.200 Earthwork· Clear & Grub 245,728 SF 0.33 81,090 190,623 19 Tree Removal 75 EA 1,000.00 75,000 20 Seolls Management 1 LS 12,500.00 12,500 21 Water 1 LS 12 500.00 12,500 22 Surve~ 2 MOS 4,766.30 9,533 23 2.001 General Labor 2.5 MOS 4,333.00 10,833 10,833 24 2.002 Misc. Rentals 2.5 MOS 2,500.00 6250 6,250 25 2.003 Small Tools 2.5 MOS 250.00 625 625 SUBTOTAL $ 1,081,605 $ 1,081,605 384,331 SF@ $ 2.81 /Sf 8.82 Acres total 0. 77 Acres actually on Loi 2 8.05 Acres Lot 1 Page 2of13 C-43 ~ BRICKWALK, LLC 666 • 683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -MIXED USE BUILDING WITH GARAGE MAY 2, 2013 SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION TOTAL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SITE WORK 1.001 Plans & Engineering NIC LS 1.060 Permits & Fees NIC LS 1.400 Tes ting & lns~ction NIC LS 4 2.015 Protection -Fence INCLUDED LF 59,365 5 Barricade 420 LF 75.00 31500 6 Sale!~ Administrator 19 MOS 1,466.58 27,865 7 2.070 Salva e NIC LS 8 2.045 Demo Assist NIC LS 9 2.199 Erosion Control LS 15,000.00 15,000 15,000 10 2.198 S\/\iPPP LS 7,500.00 7,500 52,500 11 2011 Management R~ulrements; QSP 3rd Part~ Al.LOWANCE LS 45,000 00 45,000 12 2.050 Demolition NIC LS 13 2.200 Earthwor1< -Clear&Grub NIC SF 4,164,664 14 Mass Excavation IT extile La~ers 1271801 SF 8.00 1,022,406 15 Bench for ShorlrJ!l North Line of Caissons 14,400 SF 3.00 43,200 16 Bench for ShorirJ!l South Line of Caissons 14,400 SF 3.00 43,200 17 OXR 18' at Garage 51,294 CY 3.25 166,706 18 OXR 48' Between Shored Retaining Walls 28,302 CY 3.25 91,982 19 OXR 20· at East Side of Garage 61634 CY 3.25 21,559 20 OXR 15' at Toe of Sloe• I Benched Area 11,334 CY 3.25 36,835 21 Exeort 94,667 CY 25.50 2,414,013 22 Backfill 31,852 CY 6.00 191,111 23 Fill Planters 7 CY 250.00 1852 24 seoils Management 1 LS 35,000.00 35,000 25 Finegrade 1 127,801 SF 0.15 19,170 26 Fln!!£!rada 2 50,860 SF 0.15 7,629 27 Water 1 LS 5 000.00 5,000 28 Surve 1 LS 65,000.00 65,000 29 2.160 Drilled Shoring wl Caissons & Tiebacks {Rel Wall C) 43;200 SF 65.00 2,808,000 4,917,750 30 Drilled Shoring at ueeer South Wall {Ret Wall B) 26,100 SF 50.00 1,305,000 31 Ueeer West Wall {South eart of Ret Wall A) 1,050 SF 50.00 52,500 32 Drilled oad 6,100 SF 45.00 274,500 33 Drilled Wall 4560 SF 35.00 159600 34 rt of Rel Wall A 2,340 SF 35.00 81,900 35 Garage 2 West Wall {Part of Rat Wall A) 675 SF 35.00 23,625 36 Rakers NIC SF 37 Safet~ Cabling 1,867 LF 50.00 93,350 38 Monitoring 33 WKS 2,200.00 72,600 39 Remove toe 2'0" 11867 LF 25.00 46,675 40 7.101 Methane Banier NIC SF 41 2.510 A/C Pavi NIC SF 42 2.520 Site Concrete -Lacrie Foundations at Retaining Walls NIC LF 259,596 43 Medium Foundations at Stair Walls 245 LF 90.00 22,050 44 Lame Foundations • Wall A 70 LF 150.00 10,500 45 Wal\B in Buildin LF 46 Flatwor1< 250 SF 6.00 1,500 47 Curbwor1< NIC LF 48 V-Gutter at Retaining Walls 1,494 LF 24.00 35,846 49 Stalrs:2!!:llrade 700 LF 30.00 21,000 50 PIP Walls at Stairs 1,715 SF 40.00 68,600 51 Shotcrete RetalnirJ!l Wall A • South Part 1,050 SF 14.00 14,700 52 Shotcrete Retainioo Wall at Indian Peak Road 6,100 SF 14.00 85,400 53 3.355 Rebar 1 LS 38,939.46 38,939 38,939 54 2.530 Mason~ • Retaining / Planter Walls NIC SF 55 5.520 Railing ·Stair Walls 490-LF 85.00 41,650 247,020 56 Guard at Retaining Walls 1,867 LF 110.00 205,370 57 2.835 WI Fence I Gates NIC LF 58 AuloGates NIC EA 59 OffsiteWor1< 3800 SF 5.00 19,000 181,040 60 NIC SF 61 Ea e 3800 SF 3.00 11400 62 Site Concre e -rive Aeeroach 400 SF 8.00 3,200 63 Curb&Gutter 380 LF 20.00 7,600 64 Cit~ Sidewalk {brick) I Base 3,400 SF 24.00 81,600 65 A/C Paving -1' Slot Patch 380 LF 8.00 3,040 66 Landscaee & Irrigation· 24" Box Trees 8 EA 650.00 51200 67 Site Utilities -Water I Sewer I Fire I Etc. 1 LS 50 000.00 50000 68 7.100 Wate!Eroofing -Stair Walls 1,715 SF 7.00 12,005 54,705 69 Indian Peak Road Wall 6,100 SF 7.00 42,700 70 9.200 Plaster at Stair Walls 191 SY 60.00 11,433 11,433 71 9.900 Painting 1,715 SF 0.80 1,372 13,157 72 Railin s 2,357 LF 5.00 11,785 73 2.900 Landscae!ng & Irrigation 50,860 SF 4.00 203,438 228,438 74 Toesoll /Amendments 1 LS 25,000.00 25,000 75 2.700 Site Utilities -Water 20 LF 90.00 1800 292 532 76 Fire 20 LF 125.00 2,500 77 FDCIPIV/BFP/DDC 1 LS 30,000.00 30,000 78 H drants NIC EA 79 Sewer 20 LF 80.00 1600 80 Storm Drain 500 LF 90.00 45,000 81 Storm Drain Retention & Filtration NIC LS 82 Modular Wetland S~stems LS 75.000.00 75,000 83 Inlets 9 EA 450.00 4 050 84 French Drain 1,327 LF 12.50 16,582 Page 3of13 C-44 ~ BRICKWALK, LLC 666 -683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -MIXED USE BUILDING WITH GARAGE MAY 2, 2013 SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION TOTAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 85 Piee Roof Drains 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000 86 Sume PiUPume 2 EA 7,500.00 15,000 87 Gas 20 LF 50.00 1000 88 Elect ServlceNault 1 LS 80,000.00 80,000 89 UG OfOH Lines NIC LS 90 Site Li htin NIC EA 91 Low Leve( Lighting NIC LS 92 Misc. Connections LS 10,000.00 10,000 10,536,141 10,536,141 BUILDING WORK 93 3.000 Concrete -Pad Foundations 110 EA 300.00 33,000 6,877990 94 Continuous Foundations . La~e at Garage 1 Perimeter Walls 1,187 LF 180.00 213,586 95 Grade Beams at Garage 1 2,115 LF 150.00 317,250 96 Large at Garage 2 140 LF 180.00 25,200 97 Slab -Garage 1 74,180 SF 5.00 370,898 98 Gara 2 2 761 SF 5.00 13807 99 T oeelng Slab at Podium Level 27,298 SF 6.00 163,787 100 Curbs at Garage 2 (Retail I Lobb~) 720 LF 14.00 10,080 101 Podium Level 3030 LF 14.00 42,418 102 Stairs on Grade 200 LF 30.00 6,000 103 Shotcrete at Gar~e 1 -Perimeter Walls 14,239 SF 14.00 199,347 104 Interior Walls 1,975 SF 14.00 27,654 105 Elevator Walls 767 SF 14.00 10740 106 RameWalls 363 SF 14.00 5,081 107 Shotcrete at Garage 2 -Perimeter Walls 19,160 SF 14.00 268,240 108 Interior Walls 1,854 SF 14.00 25,958 109 Elevator Wells 1,046 SF 14.00 14,645 110 RameWalls 367 SF 14.00 5,144 111 PIP Stairs-on-Grade Walls 337 SF 40.00 13,494 112 PIP Planter Walls at Garage 2 Terrace 90 SF 40.00 3;600 113 Shotcrete at Podium Level -South Perimeter Wall 6 480 SF 14.00 90,720 114 East Perimeter Wall 1,130 SF 14.00 15,820 115 west Perimeter Well 1 450 SF 14.00 20300 116 Ueeer South Retaining Wall (Rel Wall B) 20,880 SF 14.00 292,320 117 Backformlng 25 1723 SF 6.00 154,338 118 Floor Pree 374 1523 SF 0.10 37,452 119 Columns 212 EA 1750.00 371,000 120 Columncaes 212 EA 800.00 169,600 121 PIP Deck w/ Beams ·Garage 2 76,941 SF 25.00 1,923,528 122 Podium Deck 74 829 SF 25.00 1,870,731 123 Pool at Podium Level -Bottom 1,250 SF 50.00 62,500 124 Walls 750 SF 50.00 37,500 125 Deck Infill NIC SF 126 Elevator Pits 2 EA 5,500.00 11000 127 Stair Infill 25 FLTS 1,750.00 43 750 128 Grout Steel 1 LS 7,500.00 7 500 129 Rebar 1 LS 825,358.81 825359 825,359 130 4.100 Mason!}'. -CMU Walls at Gar!!jje 1 Mech Rooms I Stairwells 2,043 SF 18.00 36,780 223,812 131 Garage 2 Walls 51573 SF 18.00 100,305 132 wells at Back of Retail 3152 SF 18.00 56 727 133 Pilasters NIC LF 134 Lintels/Bracing 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000 135 La~out 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000 136 4.150 Stone Veneer at Garage Walls 2,866 SF 26.00 74,524 171,097 137 Residential Walls 3 714 SF 26.00 96,573 138 3.400 Precast Trims -VvindoW Trims 2,814 LF 32.00 90,048 767 382 139 Door Trims 4,968 LF 32.00 158,976 140 Deck Edging 1,455 LF 32.00 46,560 141 Wall Caes 1,340 LF 80.00 107,173 142 VeneerCa~s 473 LF 32.00 15,125 143 Columns 76 EA 4 500.00 342,000 144 Clock Feature at Retail Entrance 1 LS 7,500.00 7500 145 2.830 Fencing -WI 215 LF 150.00 32,250 69,000 146 WI Gates -Man 5 EA 2850.00 14250 147 Auto 1 EA 10000.00 10,000 148 Securit~ Auto Gate at Deee Valle~ Drive Entrance 1 EA 12,500.00 121500 149 5.100 Structural Steel (6.5ibs/s!) 654 TONS 4,000.00 2,616,496 3,377,866 150 Stairs 25 FLTS 17500.00 437,500 151 Railings-Wall 730 LF 50.00 36,500 152 Ralli!)gS -Guard 580 LF 110.00 63,800 153 Balcon~ Guardrails 1,778 LF 110.00 195,570 154 Corridor Guardrails 150 LF 110.00 16,500 155 Trash Gates 4 EA 2,250.00 9000 156 OH Door Sue22rt at Garage Entrance 1 LS 2,500.00 2,500 157 Misc. Metals 1 LS 405 343.97 405344 405 344 158 5.300 Metal Deck NIC SF 159 6.100 Wall Framing Exterior -Garage 2 Walls (Retail I Lobb~) 13,933 SF 5.00 69,664 6,270,358 160 Podium Level 33328 SF 3.50 116,650 161 2nd Floor 35292 SF 3.50 123,521 162 3rd Floor 30,363 SF 3.50 106,271 163 4th Floor 24,806 SF 3.50 86,820 164 Roof Parae;ets 8,686 SF 5.00 43,430 165 Baleen~ Walls 11295 SF 5.00 6,473 166 Interior Walls -Garage 2 Walls (Retail I Lobb~) 900 SF 6.00 5,400 167 Residential Units 153,440 SF 3.00 460,320 Page4of13 C-45 '-~ BRICKWALK, LLC 655 • 683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -MIXED USE BUILDING WITH GARAGE MAY2, 2013 SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION TOTAL --__ H ______ ----------- 168 Demising Walls 36,403 SF 9.00 327,626 169 En!!): Columns 1,200 SF 5.00 6,000 170 Furring at Garage 2 Walls (Retail I Lobb~) 2,100 SF 3.00 6,300 171 Soffits -Exterior Above Balconies & Oeen Corridors 26,770 SF 8.00 214,161 172 Eaves 11,917 SF 8.00 95,334 173 Interior NIC SF 174 Ceilings -Retail I Lobb~ 15,411 SF 8.00 123,289 175 Podium Level 47 531 SF 8.00 380,251 176 2nd Floor 46624 SF 8.00 372,989 177 3rd Floor 44,361 SF 8.00 354,885 178 4th Floor 35,983 SF 8.00 287 866 179 Floor Framing -2nd Floor 53,884 SF 14.00 754,375 180 3rd Floor 50,538 SF 14.00 707,526 181 4th Floor 41,391 SF 14.00 579468 182 Roof Framlog -Podium Level 800 SF 16.00 12,800 183 2nd Floor S12f:!ed 4,667 SF 16.00 74,670 184 3rd Floor -Sloe!!2 8,471 SF 16.00 135,537 185 Flat 2,007 SF 15.00 30106 186 4th Floor -Si2E!!!d 271694 SF 16.00 443,104 187 Flat 20,368 SF 15.00 305,523 188 Backin INCLUDED LS 189 Misc. 1 LS 40,000.00 40,000 190 6-410 Cabinetrt -Lowers 2,961 LF 220.00 651,420 1,677,400 191 uel?!!rs 1,716 LF 190.00 326,040 192 T2f:!S -Stone Counters 2,961 LF 180.00 532,980 193 Closet Shelf & Pole 4174 LF 40.00 166,960 194 Benches NIC LF 195 6.200 Finish Cs[e!!n!!): -Wood Base 23,302 LF 8.00 186,416 369,438 196 Trellises 360 SF 50.00 18,000 197 Eaves 11917 SF 8.00 95,334 198 Corbels 298 EA 150.00 44,688 199 Misc. 1 LS 25,000.00 25,000 200 7.200 Insulation -Wall 364867 SF 0.40 145 947 331,786 201 Ceiling 1891910 SF 0.45 85,460 202 Floor 145,812 SF 0.45 65,615 203 Roof-Batt 63207 SF 0.55 34,764 204 7.110 Deck Coating at Exterior Corridors 19,645 SF 8.00 157,163 157,163 205 7.600 Sheet Metal 15,796 LF 20.00 315,919 547,030 206 Deck to Wat! 7,117 LF 16.00 113,872 207 Roof Seecialties 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000 208 Gutters & Downs~uts 1,490 LF 25.00 37,240 209 Finials NIC EA 210 Entrt Canoe~ LS 25,000.00 25,000 211 Standln Seam NIC SF 212 Louvers LS 15,000.00 15,000 213 Egulement Pads LS 25,000.00 25,000 214 Sk II hts NIC EA 215 Egulement Screen NIC LF 216 7.300 Roofing-Tile 40,832 SF 13.50 551,231 696,671 217 BUR 22375 SF 6.50 145,439 218 Roof -RiS!d I Denscteck NIC SF 219 7.100 Wate~rooffng -Below Grade 601473 SF 8.00 483,782 1,068,574 220 Pits 2 EA 2,500.00 5,000 221 Between Slab at Podium 27,298 SF 6.00 163,787 222 Planters I Pool on Deck 2,100 SF 6.00 12,600 223 Concrete Sealer at Garage Levels 1531882'· SF 1.00 153,882 224 Under Tile 19824 SF 5.00 99122 225 Balconies I Exterior Corridors 21,486 SF 7.00 150401 226 7.900 Caulking & Sealants 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000 20,000 227 Flrestoeeing 1 LS 80,ooo.oo 60,000 60,000 228 7.260 Firel1!:20fi!:!ll NIC SF 229 8.330 OH Shutter Doors NIC EA 230 10.650 Oeerable Partition NIC LS 231 8.100 Doors I Frames / HW 700 EA 1100.00 770,000 2,348,800 232 Closet Doors 704 EA 750.00 528 000 233 Baleen~ I Patio Doors 366 EA 1,550.00 567,300 234 Doors at Guardrails (No Balconies) 74 EA 1,550.00 114,700 235 Installation 1844 EA 200.00 368,800 236 8.810 Glass -Exterior Storefront at Retail Level 218 SF 40.00 6720 487,435 237 Residential 'Mndows 4,135 SF 65.00 268,775 238 Interior NIC SF 239 Sliding Doors 66 EA 1,750.00 115,500 240 Shower Enciosures 1836 SF 40.00 73440 241 Rated 'Mre Glass I HM Frames NIC LS 242 Glass Door Adder 6 EA 3,500.00 21,000 243 8.110 OH Doors NIC EA 244 8.306 Access Panels 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000 5,000 245 8.300 Smokeguards 12 EA 5,500.00 66,000 66,000 246 9.100 D~all-Walls 519,207 SF 2.20 1,142,256 2,515,851 247 Cement Board at Shower Walls 13 632 SF 3.00 40,896 248 · r Underta ment 158,665 SF 3.00 475,994 249 Exterior 26,770 SF 2.80 74,956 250 189910 SF 2.80 531,748 251 1 LS 150,000.00 150,000 252 1 LS 100 000.00 100,000 Page 5 of13 C-46 NO. 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 DESCRIPTION 9.200 Plaster Walls Ceilin Sofllt Shower Wails Foam Sha es 9.225 Scrap Bins 9.680 Flooring -Retail I Lobby Base Exterior Conidors Residential Units 9.310 Ceramic Tile -Floor 9.630 Demlsin Walls 9.900 Masonry Sealer Doors WI & Rallings Misc. 2.510 Striping & Signs at Garage 10.150 Toilet Accessories Showers Fireplaces 12.500 V\lndow Treatment 10.622 Fire Extinguishers 10.400 Directories I Building Signage 14;200 Elevator Code Requirements/Coordination 15.300 Fire Sprinklers 15.500 HVAC Carbon Monoxide Detection System 15.400 Plumbing Redundant Subslab Drainage System Vert I Horizontal Drainage Coord Piping 16.050 Electrical Fire Alarm BRICKWALK, LLC 655 • 683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -MIXEO USE BUILOING WITH GARAGE MAY2, 2013 QTY UNIT 17 629 SY NIC SY 2,974 SY NIC SF NIC LS 19 MOS 15,411 SF 929 LF NIC SF 154,674 SF 19,824 SF 4,413 LF 6,322 SF 13,632 SF NIC SF 36,403 SF 709,117 SF 185,435 SF 18,383 SF 1844 EA 3,088 LF 1 LS 135,710 SF 239 RMS 59 EA 66 EA NIC SF 30 EA NIC LS 13 STOPS 1 LS 374,523 SF 374,523 SF 151,121 SF 374,523 SF 76,941 SF 48,109 SF 374,523 SF 374,523 SF UNIT COST 60.00 70.00 5,849.55 3.50 1.50 3.50 14.00 12.00 16.00 12.00 4.00 0.50 1.00 0.80 75.00 15.00 60,000.00 0.20 1,500.00 500.00 1,700.00 325.00 28,000.00 15,000,00 2.85 5.50 0.50 7.00 2.00 5.00 10.00 1.60 Area of Refuge Communication System 8 EA 6,500.00 Fire Alarm Conduit 374,523 SF 1.20 Low Voltage Systems NIC LS Conduits 374,523 LS 1.20 HVAC Control Conduits 374,523 LS 1.25 2.051 Scaffolding 161,531 SF 2.50 2.001 General Labor 19.0 MOS 7,500.00 2.002 Misc. Rentals 19.0 MOS 5,000.00 2.003 Small Tools 19.0 MOS 2,000.00 2.004 Flnal Clean 374,523 SF 0.10 SUBTOTAL 374,523 SF@ 152.21 /sf Site Premium HS 7,000,000.00 Garage/Retail 153,882 SF 125.00 Residential 201,269 SF 145.00 TOTAL 355,151 SF $ Residential Only 201,269 283.23 Site Premium 1 LS 7,000,000.00 Garage 310 STALLS 60,000.00 Retail 14.200 SF 125.00 Residential 201,269 SF 145.00 TOTAL Site Premium 1 LS 7,000,000.00 Residential 201,269 245.00 Retail 14.200 125.00 TOTAL 215,469 SF Average of 4 cost comparisons $ Averaae of 4 clus detailed estimate $ Page6of13 EXTENSION 1,057,765 208,212 111,141 53,939 1393 541,361 277 541 52,956 101,156 163,584 145,611 354,559 185.435 14.707 138,300 46,319 60,000 27,142 358,500 29500 112,200 9,750 364,000 15,000 1,067,392 2,059,879 75,560 2,621,664 153,882 240,545 3,745,235 599,238 52,000 449 428 449,428 468,154 403,828 142,500 95,000 38,000 37,452 46,468,616 57,004,757 7,000,000 19,235,275 29183,998 55,419,273 57,004,757 7,000,000 18,600,000 1,775,000 29,183,998 56,558,998 7,000,000 49,310.893 1,775,000 58,085,893 56,767,230 56,814,736 $ SECTION TOTAL 1,265,977 111,141 596,693 595,238 145611 799,319 27,142 388,000 112,200 9,750 379,000 1,067,392 2,135,440 3,016,092 5,763,483 403,828 142,500 95,000 38,000 37,452 46,468,616 57,004,757 C-47 NO. DESCRIPTION BRICKWALK, LLC 655 • 683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -UPHILL & DO\MJHILL TO\MJHOMES MAY2,2013 QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION SECTION TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SITE WORK 1 1.001 Plans & Enaineerina NIC LS $ $ 2 1.060 Permits & Fees NIC LS 3 1.400 T estina & lnseection NIC LS 4 2.015 Protection -Fence INCLUDED LF 5 Barricade NIC LF 6 Safetx Administrator NIC MOS 7 2.070 Salva e NIC LS 8 2.045 Demo Assist NIC LS 9 2.199 Erosion Control LS 25,000.00 25,000 25,000 10 2.198 SWPPP LS 7,500.00 7,500 22,500 11 2011 Manaaement R!!9ulrements; QSP 3rd Partx ALLOWANCE LS 15,000.00 15 1000 12 2.050 Demolition NIC SF 13 2.200 Earthwork -Clear&Grub NIC SF 4 307,219 14 Mass Excavation I Tex tile Laxers 223,374 SF 8.00 1,786,991 15 OXR I Scarifl at Building Pads 2,395 CY 3.25 7,784 16 Sitework I Flatwork I Street A 46,527 CY 3.25 151,212 17 Landscaeed Slo~s NIC CY 18 Area over Retail Parking for SD Pit 19 EXf?2rtllmf?2rl 82,731 CY 25.50 2,109,643 20 Backfill 16,546 CY 6.00 99,277 21 Fill Planters NIC CY 22 S1?2il• Management 1 LS 35,000.00 35,000 23 Fin!!!!rade 1 223,374 SF 0.15 33,506 24 Fin!!!!rade 2 158,703 SF 0.15 23,806 25 Water 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000 26 Surve 1 LS 55,000.00 55,000 27 2.150 Drilled Shoring at Retaininjj Wall H 24,360 SF 65.00 1,583,400 1,998,275 28 East Pro~ Line Wall 3;200 SF 65.00 208,000 29 Rakers NIC SF 30 Safetx Cabli!}I! 1,190 LF 50.00 59,500 31 Monitoring 28 WKS 2,200.00 61,600 32 Remove to~ 2'0" 3,431 LF 25.00 85,775 33 Drilled Shoring w/Tie Backs NIC SF 34 7.101 Methane Barrier NIC SF 35 2.510 NC Paving -Street A 50,249 SF 3.20 160,796 173,358 36 stneing & Signs 50,249 SF 0.25 12,562 37 2.520 Site Concrete -Lar2e Foundations at Retaini!}I! Walls 3,431 LF 150.00 514,650 1,213,255 38 Medium Foundations at Street A Tums 340 LF 135.00 45900 39 Stair Walls 194.81 LF 90.00 17,533 40 Flatwork I Drivewa~s 5,243 SF 6.00 31,461 41 Curbwork 1,825 LF 16.00 29,200 42 Curb& Gutter 1,825 LF 22.00 40,150 43 V-Gutter at Retaining Walls 3,431 LF 24.00 82,344 44 Stairs-on:jjrade 200 LF 30.00 6,000 45 PIP Walls -Low Wall at Street A Tums 2,040 SF 40.00 81600 46 Stair Walls 584 SF 40.00 23,377 47 Shotcrete Retaining Wall H 24,360 SF 14.00 341,040 48 3.355 Rebar 1 LS 181 988.27 181,988 181,988 49 2.530 Mason!}'. -CMU Retaining Wall D 5,760 SF 20.00 115,200 512,200 50 WallE 5850 SF 20.00 117,000 51 WallF 5,800 SF 20.00 116,000 52 WallG 8,200 SF 20.00 164,000 53 Planters NIC SF 54 5.520 Railing -Guard at Street A 320 LF 110.00 35,200 420,260 55 Retainina Walls 3,431 LF 110.00 377,410 56 Walls at Stairs 90 LF 85.00 7,650 57 2.835 WI Fence I Gates NIC LF 58 Auto Gates NIC EA 59 Off site Work at Indian Peak Road -SawcuURemove Drive Aegroach 553 SF 5.00 2,763 49,853 so Earthwork -Flnearade 553 SF 3.00 1,658 61 Stte Concrete -Drive Aegroach 553 SF 8.00 4,421 62 Curb & Gutter Patch-back 10 LF 20.00 200 63 Cit Sidewalk NIC SF 64 NC Paving -1' Slot Patch 70 LF 8.00 560 65 Landscaee & Irrigation NIC SF 66 UtilliX Work -Storm Drain NIC EA 67 Water I Sewer I Gas I Fire NIC LS 68 Street I Traffic Lights NIC EA 69 Deeg Vallex Drive -SawcuURemove Drive Aeeroach & Sidewalk 1,320 SF 5.00 6,600 70 SawcuURernove Curb & Gutter 55 LF 5.00 275 71 Earthwork -Finegrade 11320 SF 3.00 3,960 72 Site Concrete -Drive ~roach 448 SF 8.00 3,583 73 Curb & Gutter Patch-back 55 LF 20.00 1,100 74 Cit~ Sidewalk 872 SF 8.00 6,977 75 Parkwax Drain 15 LF 125.00 1,875 76 NC Paving -1' Slot Patch 110 LF 8.00 880 77 Landscage & lrri9alion NIC SF 78 Site Utilities -Water I Sewer I Gas I Fire 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000 79 7.100 Wate!:eroofing -Retaining Walls 49,970 SF 7.00 349,790 349,790 80 9.200 Plaster at Retaining Walls 499 SY 60.00 29,933 29,933 81 9.900 Painting 499 SF 0.80 399 19,604 Page 7of13 C-48 ~ BRICKWALK, LLC 655 -683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -UPHILL & DOWNHILL TOWNHOMES MAY2, 2013 SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION TOTAL 82 Railin s 3,841 LF 5.00 19,205 83 2.900 Landscaei~ & lrri9ation 108.455 SF 4.00 433,819 458,819 84 Toesoil I Amendments 1 LS 25,000.00 25,000 85 2.700 Site Utilities -Water 1,825 LF 90.00 164,250 1,578,551 86 Fire 2.400 LF 125.00 300,000 87 FDC/PIV/BFP/DDC 1 LS 30000.00 30,000 88 H~drants 12 EA 4,500.00 54,750 89 Sewer 1,825 LF 80.00 146,000 90 Slorm Drain 3,098 LF 90.00 278,862 91 Storm Drain Retention & Filtration F500cu) 1 LS 100,000.00 100,000 92 Modular Wetland S~stems 2 EA 25,000.00 50,000 93 Inlets 39 EA 450.00 17,550 94 French Drain 3,431 LF 12.50 42,888 95 Pi~ Roof Drains 1 LS 50 1000.00 50,000 96 Sum PiUPum NIC EA 97 Gas 1,825 LF 50.00 91,250 98 Elect ServiceNault 1 LS 150,000.00 150,000 99 UG of OH Lines NIC LS 100 Site LiQhtina 16 EA 5,000.00 78,000 101 Low Level Li htin NIC LS 102 Misc. Connections LS 25,000.00 25,000 11,340,606 11,340,606 BUILDING WORK 103 3.000 Concrete -Uehill -Medium Continuous Foundations 1,362 LF 110.00 149,860 1,072,048 104 Slab 34373 SF 6.00 206238 105 Curbs 1 362 LF 16.00 21,798 106 Stairs on Grade NIC LF 107 PIP Deck NIC SF 108 Floor Pree 68,746 SF 0.10 6,875 109 Columns NIC EA 110 u Wt. Toeein9 34,373 SF 5.00 171,865 111 Elevator Pit NIC LS 112 Stair Infill NIC FLTS 113 Grout Steel 1 LS 3 500.00 3500 114 Downhill -Medium Continuous Foundations 1,196 LF 110.00 131,516 115 Slab 30,298 SF 6.00 181,785 116 Patio Slab 2,156 SF 6.00 12,936 117 Curbs 1,196 LF 16.00 19,130 118 Stairs on Grade NIC LF 119 PIP Deck NIC SF 120 Floor Pree 60,595 SF 0.10 6,060 121 Columns NIC EA 122 Deck Infill 30298 SF 5.00 151,488 123 Elevator Pit NIC LS 124 Stairtnfill NIC FLTS 125 Grout Steel LS 9,000.00 9,000 126 Rebar LS 160807.20 160,807 160,807 127 4.100 Mason NIC SF 128 4.150 Stone v~ at Uehill 1,260 SF 26.00 32,760 32,760 129 Downhill NIC SF 130 3.400 Precast Trims at Uehill -Window Trims 4,560 LF 25.00 114,000 484,900 131 Door Trims 1,968 LF 25.00 49,200 132 Garage Door Trims 864 LF 25.00 21,600 133 Entr~ Wall Surrounds 72 LF 25.00 1,800 134 OH Trim at Covered Patio 77 LF 25.00 1925 135 Wall Caes at Veneer 556 LF 25.00 13,900 136 Balcon~ Walls 84 LF 25.00 2,100 137 Bands 1,149 LF 25.00 28725 138 Chimn!!j'.Caes 25 EA 750.00 18,750 139 Downhill -Window Trims 3,960 LF 25.00 99000 140 Door Trims 1 760 LF 25.00 44,000 141 Garaae Door Trims 792 LF 25.00 19,800 142 Ent!}'. Wall Surrounds 672 LF 25.00 16,800 143 OH Trim at Covered Patio 48 LF 25.00 1200 144 Wall Caes at Veneer NIC LF 145 Balcon~ Walls 200 LF 25.00 5,ooo 146 Bands 1,224 LF 25.00 30600 147 Chimne~ Caes 22 EA 750.00 16,500 148 2.830 WI Fencln NIC LF 149 Gates NIC EA 150 5.100 Structural Steel -Uehill (1.0lbs/~ 17.2 TONS 3,200.00 54,997 646,787 151 Stairs NIC FLTS 152 Rallin s-Wall NIC LF 153 Railings -Balcon~ I Patio Guardrails 530 LF 110.00 58,300 154 WI Window Grilles 11 EA 110.00 1,210 155 Downhill {Bibs/~ 121.2 TONS 4,000.00 484,760 156 Stairs NIC FLTS 157 Rallin s-Wall NIC LF 158 Railings -Balconl I Patio Guardrails 432 LF 110.00 47,520 159 WI Window Grilles NIC EA 160 Misc. Metals LS 77,614.41 77,614 77,614 161 5.300 Metal Deck -Uehill NIC SF 158,690 Page 8of13 C-49 l:Jm BRICKWALK, LLC 655 -683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -UPHILL & DOWNHILL TOWNHOMES MAY2,2013 SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION TOTAL 162 Downhill 30298 SF 4.00 121190 163 HoisVClean 1 LS 7,500.00 7,500 164 Closure Flashi!!JlS 1 LS 30,000.00 30,000 165 6.100 Wall Frami!!Jl -Ue!Jill -Exterior Walls 38,594 SF 3.50 135,080 3,508,158 166 Balcon~ Walls 476 SF 3.50 1,666 167 Full-Height at Roofed Balconies 1,260 SF 3.50 4,410 168 Ent!:)'. Columns 4,040 SF 3.50 14,140 169 Interior Walls 50112 SF 3.00 150,336 170 Demisin9 Walls 5,405 SF 6.00 32,428 171 Furring at Relaining Walls 11,347 SF 2.50 28,368 172 Soffits -Interior NIC SF 173 Exterior 4080 SF 6.50 26,520 174 Eaves 5,044 SF 2.50 12,610 175 Ceiling 681746 SF 8.00 549,967 176 Floor Framing -2nd Floor 34 1373 SF 14.00 481,221 177 Roof Framing 34,373 SF 16.00 549,967 178 Backing INCLUDED LS 17,500.00 179 Downhill -Exterior Walls 34,394 SF 3.50 120,378 180 Balcon~ Walls 1,100 SF 3.50 3,850 181 Full-Height at Roofed Balconies 1,440 SF 3.50 5,040 182 Ent!:)'. Columns 3,696 SF 3.50 12,936 183 Interior Walls 58,014 SF 3.00 174,042 184 Demising Walls 41829 SF 6.00 28,975 185 Furring at Retaining Walls 10,482 SF 2.50 26,205 186 Soffits -Interior NIC SF 187 Exterior 2,772 SF 6.50 18,018 188 Eaves 4,992 SF 2.50 12,480 189 Ceiling 60,595 SF 8.00 484,760 190 Floor Framing -2nd Floor NIC SF 191 Roof Framing 30,298 SF 16.00 484,760 192 Bacl<in INCLUDED LS 193 Misc. 1 LS 150 000.00 150 000 194 6.410 Cabinet!:)'. -Uehill • Lowers 696 LF 220.00 153,120 978,860 195 u 480 LF 190.00 91200 196 1 080 LF 40.00 43200 197 To 696 LF 180.00 125,280 198 Downhill -Lowers 1,012 LF 220.00 222,840 199 ue~rs 506 LF 190.00 96,140 200 Closet Shelf & Pole 1,628 LF 40.00 65120 201 To 1012 LF 180.00 182,160 202 6.200 Finish Car~nt!:)'. -Uehill • Wood Base 6,264 LF 8.00 50,112 499,948 203 Trellises 18 EA 3,500.00 63,000 204 Facia 2,602 LF 22.00 57,244 205 Eaves 5,044 SF 8.00 40,352 206 Corbels at Eaves 79 EA 150.00 11,850 207 Under Decks 125 EA 450.00 56,250 208 Downhill • Wood Base 8 074 LF 8.00 64,592 209 Trellises 10 EA 3,500.00 35,000 210 Facia 2496 LF 22.00 54,912 211 Eaves 4,992 SF 8.00 39,936 212 Corbels at Eaves 178 EA 150.00 26700 213 Under Decks NIC EA 214 7.200 Insulation -Uehill Homes -Wall 1001054 SF 0.40 40,021 190,417 215 Ceilina 68;746 SF 0.45 30,936 216 Floor 34,373 SF 0.45 15,468 217 Roof -Batt 34 373 SF 0.55 18905 218 Uehill Homes -Wall 1021890 SF 0.40 41,156 219 Ceiling 60,595 SF 0.45 27,268 220 Floor NIC SF 221 Roof· Batt 30,298 SF 0.55 16,664 222 7.110 Deck Coating -Uehill NIC SF 223 Downhill NIC SF 224 7.600 Sheet Metal -Uehill -General Flashings 121485 LF 16.00 199,766 555,795 225 Deck to Wall 1104 LF 14.00 15,456 226 Roof SE!!!<iallies LS 12,500.00 12,500 227 Finials NIC EA 228 Gutters & Downs112u1s 2,384 LF 25.00 59,100 229 Can ies NIC LS 230 Louvers NIC LS 231 Attic Screens LS 5,000.00 5,000 232 Eguiement Pads NIC LS 233 Sk II his NIC EA 234 Exeansion Joint at Retainina Walls NIC LF 235 Downhill -General Flashings 11,219 LF 16.00 179,502 236 Deck to Wall 880 LF 14.00 12,320 237 Roof SE!!!<ialties 1 LS 12,500.00 12,500 238 Finials 10 EA 500.00 5,000 239 Gutters & Downseouts 2,086 LF 25.00 52,150 240 Cano ies NIC LS 241 Louvers LS 242 Attic Screens LS 2500.00 2,500 243 Equiement Pads NIC LS Page 9of13 C-50 ~ BRICKWALK, LLC 655 -683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -UPHILL & DOWNHILL TOWNHOMES MAY2,2013 SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION TOTAL 244 Sk Ii hts NIC EA 245 Exeansion Joint at Retaining Walls NIC LF 246 7.300 Roofing -Uehill -Tile 34,373 SF 10.00 343,730 646,705 247 BUR NIC SF 248 Roof -Rigid I Densdeck NIC SF 249 Downhill-Tile 30,298 SF 10.00 302,975 250 BUR NIC SF 251 Roof -Risid I Densdeck NIC SF 252 7.100 Walea:!roofina -UJ:?hill -Below Grade 11,347 SF 8.00 90,778 320,155 253 Pits NIC LS 254 Concrete Sealer 11,492 SF 1.00 11,492 255 Under Tile 12 074 SF 5.00 60,372 256 Downhill -Below Grade 10,482 SF 8.00 83,854 257 Pits NIC LS 258 Concrete Sealer 8812 SF 1.00 8,812 259 Under Tiie 12,969 SF 5.00 64,847 260 7.900 Caulkins & Sealants 1 LS 19,500.00 19,500 19,500 261 Fires1oee!n11 1 LS 46,000.00 46,000 46,000 262 7.250 Fireeroofing NIC SF 263 8.100 , Doors I Frames I HW-UJ:?!:!ill -Slandard Doors 240 EA 950.00 228,000 1,082.700 264 Closet Doors 192 EA 750.00 144,000 265 Balcon~ I Patio Doors 72 EA 1,550.00 111,600 266 Installation 504 EA 200.00 100,800 267 Downhill -Slandard Doors 330 EA 950.00 313 500 268 Closet Doors 44 EA 750.00 33,000 269 Baleen~ I Patio Doors 44 EA 1,550.00 68,200 270 Installation 418 EA 200.00 83,600 271 8.810 Glass -Uehlll -Exterior Windows 31744 SF 65.00 243,360 794,000 272 Interior NIC SF 273 Shower Enclosures 192 SF 40.00 7,680 274 Oeerable Sliders {Slidin9 Doors! NIC SF 275 Rated Wire Glass I HM Frames NIC LS 276 Glass Door Adder NIC SF 277 Downhill -Exterior Windows 5,104 SF 65.00 331,760 278 Interior NIC SF 279 Shower Enclosures 1,980 SF 40.00 79,200 280 Oeerable Sliders {Slidin11 Doors) 44 EA 3,000.00 132,000 281 Rated Wire Glass I HM Frames NIC LS 282 Glass Door Adder NIC SF 283 8.110 Gara9e Doors • UJ:?!:!ill 24 EA 1,500.00 36,000 69,000 284 Downhill 22 EA 1,500.00 33,000 285 8.305 Access Panels 1 LS 45,500.00 45500 45,500 286 9.100 D~all -Uehill ·Walls 150,166 SF 2.20 330,364 1,492,191 287 Cement Board at Showers 6,336 SF 3.00 19,008 288 Exterior Underla~ment 46,106 SF 3.00 138,319 289 Soffits • Interior NIC SF 290 Exterior 4,080 SF 2.80 11,424 291 Ceilin11 68,746 SF 2.80 192.489 292 1 Hour Shaft Work NIC LS 293 Misc. 1 LS 70,000.00 70,000 294 Downhill -Walls 160,904 SF 2.20 353,988 295 Cement Board at Showers 5,808 SF 3.00 17,424 296 Exterior Underla~ment 43,170 SF 3.00 129,509 297 Soffits • Interior NIC SF 298 Exterior 2,772 SF 299 Ce iii nil 601595 SF 2.80 169;666 300 1 Hour Shaft Work NIC LS 301 Misc. 1 LS 60,000.00 60,000 302 !l.200 Plasler -Uehill -Walls 5,123 SY 60.00 307,376 648,468 303 Ceilin NIC SY 304 Soffit -Exterior 453 SY 70.00 31,733 305 Shower Walls NIC SF 306 Foam Sha es NIC LS 307 Downhill Walls 4 797 SY 60.00 287,799 308 Ceilin NIC SY 309 Soffit -Exterior 308 SY 70.00 21,560 310 Shower Walls NIC SF 311 Foam Sha s NIC LS 312 9.225 Scrae Bins 15 MOS 1,950 29,248 29,248 313 9.680 Floorin9 -Uehlll 50,667 SF 3.00 152,000 274,630 314 Downhill 40,877 SF 3.00 122,630 315 9.310 Ceramic Tile -Ue!Jill -Floor 31581 SF 12.00 42,972 303,430 316 Base 1,056 LF 12.00 12,672 317 Shower Walls 6,336 SF 10.00 63,360 318 Balconies 2, 157 SF 12.no 25,888 31S Patios I Ent!}'. Stees NIC SF 320 Downhill -Floor 4,494 SF 12.00 53,S27 321 Base 1.210 LF 12.00 14520 322 Shower Walls 5,808 SF 10.00 58,080 323 Balconies 2,668 SF 12.00 32,010 324 Patios NIC SF 325 9.530 Acoustical Treatment @ Nei9hbor Walls 10,234 SF 10.00 102,338 102,338 Page 10of13 C-51 D.il; BRICKWALK, LLC 655 -683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -UPHILL & DOWNHILL TOWNHOMES MAY2,2013 SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION TOTAL 326 9.900 Paintina • Uehill -D~all 218,912 SF 0.40 87,565 346,165 327 Plaster 46106 SF 0.80 36,885 328 Mason!}'. Sealer NIC SF 329 Doors 504 EA 75.00 37,800 330 WI & Railings 530 LF 15.00 7,950 331 Misc. 1 LS 7,500.00 7,500 332 Downhill -D~all 221,499 SF 0.40 88,599 333 Plaster 43170 SF 0.80 34,536 334 Mason!}'. Sealer NIC SF 335 Doors 418 EA 75.00 31,350 336 WI & Railinas 432 LF 15.00 6,480 337 Misc. 1 LS 7 500.00 7,500 338 10.150 Toilet Accessories -Uehill 72 RMS 400.00 28,800 113,200 339 Showers 72 EA 500.00 36,000 340 Downhill 68 RMS 400.00 26,400 341 Showers 44 EA 500.00 22000 342 Fireeiaces -Uehill 24 EA 1,700.00 40,800 78,200 343 Downhill 22 EA 1,700.00 37,400 344 10.536 Window AwniQ!Js • Uehill 7 EA 11500.00 10,500 67,500 345 Downhill 38 EA 1,500.00 57,000 346 12.500 Window Treatment NIC SF 347 10.522 Fire Extinguishers 46 EA 280.00 12,880 12,880 348 10.400 Directories I Buildlna Sl9naae NIC LS 349 14.200 Elevator NIC STOPS 350 15.300 Fire Sf1!:inklers • Uehill 68,746 SF 1.80 123,743 232,814 351 Downhill 60595 SF 1.80 109071 352 15.500 HVAC -Uehill 68,746 SF 8.50 584,340 1,099,398 353 Downhill 60,595 SF 8.50 515,058 354 15.400 PlumbiQIJ • Ue!]ill 68,746 SF 8.30 570,591 1,073,529 355 Downhill 60,595 SF 8.30 502,939 356 16.050 Electrical -Uehill 681746 SF 9.00 618,713 1,771,970 357 Downhill 60 595 SF 9.00 545 355 358 Fire Alarm • Ue!]ill 68,746 SF 1.80 123,743 359 Downhill 60,595 SF 1.80 109,071 360 Fire Alarm Conduit 129,341 SF 1.20 155,209 361 Low Voltage S~stems NIC LS 362 Conduits 129,341 SF 1.00 129,341 363 HVAC Control Conduits 129 341 SF 0.70 90,539 364 2.051 Scaffolding 89,276 SF 2.50 223,191 223,191 365 2.001 General Labor 15.0 MOS 7,500.00 112,500 112,500 366 2.002 Misc. Rentals 15.0 MOS 5,000.00 75,000 75,000 367 2.003 Small Tools 15.0 MOS 2,000.00 30,000 30,000 368 2.004 Final Clean 129,341 SF 0.10 12,934 12,934 $ 19,489,930 $ 19,489,930 SUBTOTAL 30,830,536 $ 30,830,536 129,341 SF@ $ 238.37 /sf Site 158,703 SF@ $ 71.46 /sf Buildings 129,341 SF@ $ 150.69 /sf Page 11 of13 C-52 ~ BRICKWALK, LLC 655 • 683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -RENOVATED PARKING LOT AT RETAIL CENTER MAY 2. 2013 SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION TOTAL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SITE WORK 1 1.001 Plans & Engineering NIC LS $ $ $ 2 1.060 Permits & Fees NIC LS 3 1.400 Testing & lns~ction NIC LS 4 2.015 Protection -Fence 720 LF 5.00 3,600 3,600 5 Barricade NIC LF 6 Safe!)'. Administrator NIC MOS 7 2.070 Salva e NIC LS 8 2.045 Demo Assist NIC LS 9 2.199 Erosion Control 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000 5,000 10 2.198 SWPPP INCLUDED LS 5,000 11 2011 Management Reguirements; QSP 3rd Paffi: ALLOWANCE 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000 12 2.050 Demolition -Retaining Wall 4,200 SF 10.00 42,000 66,208 13 Small Buildings at Retail Strie (Buildings at Street to Remain) 2.842 SF 5.00 14,208 14 Misc. 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000 15 2.200 Earthwork -Mass Excavation 15,116 SF 1.50 22,675 151,889 16 OXR 10'0" -Retainina Walls 350 CY 10.00 3,500 17 OXR 3'0" -Extended Parking Loi 1,548 CY 6.00 9,290 18 OXR 3'0" -Balance of Site 131 CY 6.00 787 19 Ex Ori 2,781 CY 25.50 70,904 20 Backfill al Retaining Wall 1,313 CY 6.00 7,875 21 Fill Planters NIC CY 22 Seoils Mana9ement 1 LS 12,500.00 12,500 23 Flnearade 1 15,116 SF 0.15 2,267 24 Flnegrade 2 13,936 SF 0.15 2,090 25 Water 1 LS 2,500.00 2,500 26 Surve~ 1 LS 17,500.00 17,500 27 2.510 AJC PavinQ -Extended Parking Lot I Tie-in to {El 13,936 SF 3.00 41,807 80,381 28 Ovena~ at (El Parking on Grade 14,047 SF 1.75 24,583 29 Strlelng & Si9ns 27,983 SF 0.50 13,992 30 2.520 Sile Concrete -Lar9e Foundations at Retaininll Wall 315 LF 150.00 47,250 106,451 31 Medium Foundations at ADA Rame Walls 136 LF 135.00 18,297 32 Flatwork 40 SF 6.00 242 33 Ram s 379 SF 6.00 2,272 34 Curbwork 477 LF 16.00 7,630 35 Curb & Gutter NIC LF 36 V-Gutter at Retaining Wall 315 LF 24.00 7,560 37 Stairs-on-rade NIC LF 38 PIP Walls at Rames 580 SF 40.00 23,200 39 3.355 Rebar LS 10,645.08 10,645 10,645 40 2.530 Mason!}'. -CMU Retaining Walls 5,040 SF 20.00 100,800 111,642 41 CMU Rame Walls 542 SF 20.00 10,842 42 5.520 Railing -Wall at Rames 160 LF 110.00 17,600 52,250 43 Guard at Retainin9 Wall 315 LF 110.00 34,650 44 2.835 WI Fence I Gates NIC LF 45 Auto Gates NIC EA 46 Offsite Work ALLOWANCE 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000 5,000 47 7.100 Wale!J!roofing -Retaining Walls 5,040 SF 8.00 40,320 40,320 48 9.200 Plaster at CMU Walls 680 SY 60.00 40,828 40,828 49 9.900 Painting 6,124 SF 0.50 3,062 10,187 50 Railings 475 LF 15.00 7,125 51 2.900 Landscaelng & I ni9ation 1,181 SF 5.00 5,904 5,904 52 To soil NIC LS 53 2.700 Site Utllities -Water NIC LF 41,438 54 Fire NIC LF 55 FDC/PIV/BFP/DDC NIC LS 56 H drants NIC EA 57 Hot Ta NIC EA 58 Sewer NIC LF 59 Storm Drain LS 2,500.00 2,500 60 Storm Drain Retention & Filtration -SEE TOWNHOMES NIC LS 61 Inlets INCLUDED EA 62 French Drain 315 LF 12.50 3,938 63 Plee Roof Drains NIC LS 64 sume PiUPume NIC EA 65 Gas NIC LF 66 Elect ServiceNault NIC LS 67 UG of OH Lines NIC LS 68 Site uahlina 5 EA 5,000.00 25,000 69 Low Level Liahling NIC LS 70 Misc. Connections LS 10,000.00 10,000 736,744 736,744 BUILDING WORK 71 3.000 Concrete NIC EA 72 5.100 Structural Steel -Canoeies at 2nd Floor Stalrwa~ -ALLOWANCE LS 25,000.00 25,000 25,000 73 Stairs I Railings NIC FLTS 74 7.600 Sheet Metal NIC LF 75 7.100 Watereroofing Patch ALLOWANCE LS 1,500.00 1,500 1,500 76 9.200 Plaster Walls Patch ALLOWANCE LS 1,500.00 1,500 1,500 77 9.225 Sera!! Bins LS 3,000.00 3,000 3,000 Page 12of13 C-53 NO. DESCRIPTION BRICKWALK, LLC 655 -683 DEEP VALLEY DRIVE LOT 2 -RENOVATED PARKING LOT AT RETAIL CENTER MAY 2, 2013 QTY UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION SECTION TOTAL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 78 9.900 Painting -(E) Building Surfaces 79 Doors 80 WI & Railings 81 Staiiway Canopies 82 Misc. 83 10.400 Directories I Building Signage 84 Signage at Staliway Canopies 85 15.300 Fire Sprinklers 86 15.500 HVAC 87 15.400 Plumbing 88 16.050 Electrical -Canopy Lighting 89 Fire Alarm I Conduit 90 LV Systems I Conduits 91 2.051 Scaffolding I Lift Rental 92 2.001 General Labor 93 2.002 Misc. Rentals 94 2.003 Small Tools 95 2.004 Final Clean SUBTOTAL ALLOWANCE ALLOWANCE SITE & BUILDING SITE I PARKING LOT (E) RETAIL BUILDINGS Page 13of13 28,764 SF 1.50 43,146 55,146 INCLUDED EA INCLUDED LF 3 EA 1,500.00 4,500 1 LS 7,500.00 7,500 NIC LS 5,000 LS 5,000.00 5,000 NIC SF NIC SF NIC SF LS 10,000.00 10,000 10,000 NIC SF NIC LS 28,764 SF 2.00 57,529 57,529 2.0 MOS 4,333.00 8,666 8,666 2.0 MOS 2,500.00 5,000 5,000 2.0 MOS 125.00 250 250 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000 5,000 $ 177,591 $ 177,591 $ 914,335 $ 914,335 46,512 SF@ $ 19.66 /sf 15,116 SF@ $ 48.74 /sf 31,395 SF@ $ 5.66 /sf C-54 Daily Breeze and PV News articles regarding the Brickwalk, LLC project C-55 http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/ci __ )3223367/developers-revive-plans-new-homes-near-brick-walk Developers revive plans for new homes near Brick Walk in Rolling Hills Estates By Nick Green, Staff Writer Daily Breeze Posted: Daily Breeze.com Six years and one crippling recession after Rolling Hills Estates abandoned a vision to remake its flagging commercial core with hundreds of homes, a resurgent economy has revived interest in development proposals for the area. A mere 59 condominiums in two projects were built in the Deep Valley Drive area before the recession extinguished the demand for new homes. But two previously approved developments at 627 and 927 Deep Valley Drive, totaling 133 units between them, are likely to begin in quick succession this summer. Homes could begin to hit the housing market starting in 2015. And the largest single project of them all, a mixed-use project on about 8 acres essentially surrounding the existing Brick Walk retail development that includes 148 condos and town houses, will come before the City Council on Tuesday night. Review of the project is in the early stages -the developer made an initial presentation to the City Council in February -and no decision on whether to approve it is expected this week. The meeting begins at 7 p.m. at City Hall, 4045 Palos Verdes Drive North. But the flurry of activity has reignited long-held fears by some residents over a lack of parking and traffic congestion. "There's no traffic on Deep Valley Drive, period. But that's not the traffic they're worried about," Mayor Frank Zerunyan said. "It's the ingress and egress of vehicles coming on and off The Hill. " Several crowded roads and intersections surrounding the commercial corridor -which includes the struggling Promenade on the Peninsula mall, on the topographically challenged Palos Verdes Peninsula -are not "doing very well," he said. The development surrounding the Brick Walk is attractive, in part, because the developer proposes to stabilize a 1997 landslide that remains covered in black plastic to this day, an ugly civic embarrassment overlooking the "relatively deserted and rundown" street, Zerunyan said. "It's my greatest disappointment to see the slide area the way it is," he said. "It's really an eyesore. We obviously need to take a look at what kind of project can go in there and if it can benefit the community. "We're moving cautiously," he added. "We've been burned by that hillside before. We just want to make sure the hillside is safe. " There's no doubt there's plenty of pent-up demand for smaller homes on The Hill, said local real estate company owner Scott Anastasi. His firm will handle the sales of the two projects expected to get underway this summer -his father's locally well-known development company is building them -and also sold the 41 units for seniors in Rolling Hills Villas on the same street. "I saw thousands and thousands of people who came through our sales office who wanted to buy and live in Palos Verdes," he said. "The problem is there's no product available. They loved (Rolling Hills Villas), but it was age-restricted. " More homes are seen as one way to shore up the area's economic viability. Page I of2 May 13, 2013 08:43:42AMMDT C-56 http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/ ci_ 23 223 367 /developers-revive-plans-new-homes-near-brick-walk Deep Valley Drive is largely home to a collection of struggling restaurants and service businesses -hair and nail salons and the like -that do little to encourage the pedestrian-oriented ambiance the city has long wanted to cultivate. The outdoor mall has reverted to leasing space to medical professionals and other nonretail uses. On the same evening, the City Council will again discuss a plan to loosen planning regulations for those kinds of mall uses in exchange for up to $50,000 a year. Councilwoman Suzie Seamans believes experience has shown that concerns about traffic are overblown. The bigger threat, she said, is to a struggling business community that contributes crucial sales taxes that the city has traditionally relied on for around a third of its operating revenue. "The two condominium projects we've allowed to be built so far -there's no increase in traffic," she said. "The number of condominiums we're allowing to be built are just not a big enough number to make a real difference (to traffic). " Page 2 of2 May 13, 2013 08:43:42AMMDT C-57 Discussion about Brickwalk development focuses on landslide, economic viability -Palos... Page 1 of 4 Discussion about Brickwalk development focuses on landslide, economic viability By Mary Scott, Peninsula News I Posted: Friday, May 17, 2013 10:43 am RHE -The $100-million mixed-use development proposed for the open hillside on Deep Valley Drive, just underneath Indian Peak Road, has been well reviewed, according to the team assembled by the property's owner, Brickwalk LLC. Even the city of Rolling Hills Estates' engineering consultant, Willdan Engineering, has looked it over. Yet there are still unanswered questions and potential risks that the City Council wants an independent reviewer to explore. The Brickwalk development, built on two lots, encompasses more than 10 acres on a hillside, which residents call "trash bag hill," at 655-683 Deep Valley Drive and 924-950 Indian Peak Road in RHE. The project includes 148 condominium and townhome units and 14,200 square feet of commercial space. The mixed-use development is proposed for a piece of land that gave way in 1997, destroying the offices of several businesses -including the Palos Verdes Peninsula News. Nothing has been built on the lot since, as the hillside remains unstable. Today, large sheets of black plastic tarps and sandbags cover the hillside in an attempt to prevent more water from seeping into the ground, a factor that contributed to land movement in the late 1990s. With the cost of the project and mitigating the landslide, the question for council is: Is this a viable site? Land mitigation "I'd like to know how we can be assured ... that if we allow you to go forward with this project that it will actually work and stay up on the side of the hill," Councilwoman Susan Seamans asked of the project team. Before construction begins on the townhomes on the hillside and the residential and commercial mixed-use building on the street level in front of it, the landslide must be stabilized. Brickwalk LLC's engineering, geotechnical and construction team estimate the cost of the repair alone to be approximately $20 million. There is a slide plane that consists ofloose soil about 80 to 90 feet down, according to one of the city's engineering consultants. The plane extends from Crenshaw Boulevard to the boundary of the Brickwalk project. A portion of the hillside, located under a parking lot at the corner of Crenshaw and Indian Peak, slid in 1997, and is continuing to slide. To stop that from happening again, the consultant said the construction team has to remove the wet and loose soil down to the http://www.pvnews.com/news/discussion-about-brickwalk-development-focuses-on-landsl... 5/21/2013 C-58 Discussion about Brickwalk development focuses on landslide, economic viability -Palos... Page 2 of 4 bedrock and construct a retaining wall with tiebacks into the bedrock, and replace the soil with compacted fill. "Rather than take out Indian Peak, because I don't think anyone is interested in that, we have to do the tieback wall so that, while it's not fully stabilized, it's not going to be subject to sliding," the consulting engineer said. The 1997 landslide was caused by faulty construction techniques used in the 1950s and late 1960s, said Ted Wolfe, geotechnical engineer from Petra Geotechnical. When grading was done during that time, contractors placed fill on top of the loose soil, on a steep slope. Rainwater from a wet winter season in 1997 seeped beneath the fill and into the loose soil, causing it to move. The work done to stabilize the hillside will also stabilize Indian Peak, according to the engineers and geote(fhnicians looking at the project. "The slope that is there now is unstable. It is showing movement and will continue to show movement because, once again, it was constructed under previous grading codes," Wolfe said. Wolfe added that because Indian Peak is on the border of RHB and Rancho Palos Verdes, RPV's consultants have reviewed the project. Whether or not the project is approved, the city will have to at some point stabilize the hillside, according to both the city's and the project's engineers. And regardless, it's going to come at a steep price. Council must weigh the project's neighborhood impacts -such as construction noise, density and traffic -with the benefit of stabilizing the landslide. And they must review the potential risks of allowing the development. "To me, there are two types of failures," Councilman Steve Zuckerman said. "lfwe don't do the project and the hillside fails, that could be a very, very bad thing. But if we build the project and it fails, that is orders of magnitude worse." Hillside projects are scrutinized by applicants, who will carry the chain ofliability, and by lenders and insurers, said Dennis Hargrove, a representative for Brickwalk. Projects like this one, he added, are required to have a "wrap policy," which insures against any potential or identified defects or faults that occur as a result of the project. The customary wrap policy covers a 10-year period. The commercial area wiped out in the 1997 landslide was built in the 1970s. It took 20-some years for the land to give way and destroy what was in front of it. A concern expressed by council members and residents is what happens ifthe project fails after the warranty runs out. Who will protect the future property and business owners? http://www.pvnews.com/news/discussion-about-brickwalk-development-focuses-on-landsl... 5/21/2013 C-59 Discussion about Brickwalk development focuses on landslide, economic viability -Palos... Page 3 of 4 Failure not only includes destruction but damage done to the properties over time because ofland movement. "The failure in these types of projects is not that the homes slide down the hillside, but that the streets start to crack, doors don't close, you start to get cracks in the drywall, windows start to crack, interior stucco," Zuckerman said. "The place doesn't fall down the hill, but you've got a mess." Homeowner's insurance policies don't cover this type of damage, he added. "So who is here to look out for the people who are going to be buying and living in those homes? That's us," he said. "We have to really understand this insurance against land movement. That's the only thing that's going to protect the homeowner." There has been some discussion between the project team and city staff about extending the length of time of the wrap policy. "There is insurance available to extend that; it can't be done indefinitely," Hargrove said. Absent satisfactory insurance, Zuckerman said he could not support the project. Cost viability This project is an expensive one and there are no revenue figures to show the project will be financially viable, Zuckerman said. The cost of the project is currently estimated at $106 million, including the cost ofrepairing the landslide. The townhome development is roughly $30.8 million, an estimated $208,000 per unit to build, and the mixed-use building, just more than $57 million. Demolition, parking, fees, bonds, insurance and other soft costs make up the rest. "I see these per-unit costs - I don't know what the market is, but I don't see a lot of daylight between these per-unit costs and construction costs," Zuckerman said. And the costs, he added, don't include financing or permit fees. "There's not enough information here to really evaluate financial viability." The condos should sell between $700,000 and $900,000, and the townhomes between $950,000 and $1.3 million, according to Craig Stevens of Colliers International, a commercial property brokerage. The market for condominiums has been in a six-year slump, but Stevens said that it has recently picked up. With decreasing unemployment expected, more buyers should be entering the market. Council has made no decisions on the project and has instead directed city staff to prepare an RFP to seek independent reviews of the project, wanting more information about its liability, safety and the environmental impact report. http://www.pvnews.com/news/ discussion-about-brickwalk-development-focuses-on-landsl... 5/21/2013 C-60 Discussion about Brickwalk development focuses on landslide, economic viability -Palos... Page 4 of 4 The project will be back in front of council at a later date. Information about the project is available at City Hall, 4045 Palos Verdes Drive North, or online at www .rollinghillsestatesca.org. mscott@pvnews.com @PVNewsEditor on Twitter http://www.pvnews.com/news/ discussion-about-brickwalk-development-focuses-on-landsl... 5/21/2013 C-61 E-mail from Staff to EPA regarding Rancho LPG response to EPA notice of March 14, 2013 C-62 Kit Fox From: Kit Fox Sent: To: Monday, May 06, 2013 10:23 AM 'Wesling.mary@Epa.gov' Subject: Rancho LPG Response to March 14th "Show Cause" Letter Dear Ms. Wesling: Is there any information that you can report on the status of Rancho LPG's response to the EPA's "show cause" letter of March 14th? We understood that Rancho LPG had a deadline to respond by April 15th, and that the EPA might be filing a complaint in this matter on or about May 15th. Any information that you are able to share publicly would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Kit Fox, AICP Senior Administrative Anal lJSt CitlJ Mana~er's 0££ice CitlJ of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T:(310)544-5226 P: (310) 544-5291 E: kitf@mv.com 1 C-63 E-mails from San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United regarding requests for nuisance abatement at Rancho LPG facility C-64 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dear Ms. James- San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United <sphomeunited@gmail.com> Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11 :36 AM aleta.james@lacity.org; michael.logrande@lacity.org; mary wesling; meer.daniel@epa.gov; hamilton cloud; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; elise.swanson@mail.house.gov; helmlinger.andrew@epa.gov; mrenvirlaw@sbc.global.net; Kit Fox; aaron. wilensky@mail.house.gov dan.weikel@latimes.com; paul_rosenberg@hotmail.com; bea@ce.berkeley.edu Fwd: LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS FACILITY -2110 GAFFEY STREET Your response to our second request for a nuisance abatement complaint to be filed against Rancho LPG denying action is lacking any real definition. In your previous response to our initial request for nuisance abatement, your answer was: ''.At this time, please be advised that the Department does not find a basis for processing under Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.2.7.1." Below we have provided a section of that municipal code (LAMCS 12.27 .1 section B #1) which legally responds directly to the complaint against Rancho LPG. B. Authority. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code to the contrary, the Director may require the modification, discontinuance or revocation of any land use or discretionary zoning approval if it is found that the land use or discretionary zoning approval as operated or maintained: 1. Jeopardizes or adversely affects the public health, peace, or safety of persons residing or working on the premises or in the surrounding area; The City of LA is well aware of the deficient process by which this LPG operation was introduced over 40 years ago. The circumvention of proper review process, its significant geologic vulnerabilities and its exemption from LA City Fire regulations from the start make the facility's very existence extraordinarily precarious. The EPA's recent legal demand to Rancho LPG to "Show Cause" in March of this year underscores the company's indifference to safety. The EPA's original violations against Rancho LPG were issued over 2 years ago and were never complied with. Moreover, the rail accident of March 8, 2012 and the reported leaks of later last year and again early this year, are also major red flags that demand protective action immediately from the City of LA. Please let us remind you of such recent tragedies as Fukushima, San Bruno, the Gulf, and the latest just weeks ago in West, Texas. All of these disasters could have been avoided had the powers that be held their duty to protect the innocent in higher regard. In the case of Rancho LPG, the warning signs have been written on the wall ... in "neon" .. for many, many years. Those who can prevent the impending disaster simply appear to be donning blindfolds, as to respond to those warnings requires far more energy and commitment than they wish to devote. Meanwhile, thousands of lives weigh in the balance. Time to remove the blindfolds. A fair scenario for all those with oversight and jurisdiction to contemplate: It is 2:15pm on a weekday in November with a 12-knot breeze. Children are preparing to leave school for the day and the traffic is backed up all along adjacent streets with parents and busses lined up to pick up their children. Suddenly a 7.2 earthquake erupts on the Palos Verdes Fault, compromisiing one of the large butane tanks, resulting in a massive leak. The second butane tank has developed a leak also. RaJ/ cars at the loading dock have derailed, rolled over and are leaking. Are erupts at the loading dock resulting in an explosion at the containment basin, which had already overflowed into the flood control channel, leading to the Port. How would the first responders react to this situation.:> 1 C-65 We respectfully resubmit our request for the City of LA to file a Nuisance Abatement Complaint against Rancho LPG until a comprehensive risk analysis has been performed that assures safety to residents, and proof of insurance commensurate with actual loss has been provided. Thank you, Chuck Hart President From: Aleta James <aleta.james@lacity.org> To: det310@juno.com Subject: LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS FACILITY -2110 GAFFEY STREET Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 15:40:42 -0700 Mr. Hart, This e-mail is in response to your letter of April 29, 2013 on behalf of the San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United, Inc. requesting City Planning to process a nuisance abatement case against Rancho LPG. Report of the Chief Legislative Analyst dated February 19, 2013 (Council Files 11-1813, 11-1813-S1) addresses safety regulations and precautions at Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Facilities. The report identifies City Departments as well as Non-City agencies with some level of over-site at the facility related to permitting and safety requirements for liquid bulk storage facilities. As the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) and Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) are already involved in some level of over-site efforts to address permitting and safety, we respectfully encourage San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United to continue working with LAFD and LADBS to address and resolve safety issues related to the operation of the facility. Aleta James, City Planner Office of Zoning Administration Nuisance Abatement /Revocation 213.978.1368 1 Odd spice that FIGHTS diabetes Can this unusual "super spice" control your blood sugar and fight d1abetes? diabetesreversed. com 2 C-66 Kit Fox From: det31 O@juno.com Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 5:33 PM To: arriane5@aol .com; connie@rutter.us; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; Kit Fox Subject: Fw: LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS FACILITY -2110 GAFFEY STREET ----------Forwarded Message---------- From: Aleta James <aleta.james@lacity.org> To: det310@juno.com Subject: LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS FACILITY -2110 GAFFEY STREET Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 15:40:42 -0700 Mr. Hart, This e-mail is in response to your letter of April 29, 2013 on behalf of the San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United, Inc. requesting City Planning to process a nuisance abatement case against Rancho LPG. Report of the Chief Legislative Analyst dated February 19, 2013 (Council Files 11-1813, 11-1813-Sl) addresses safety regulations and precautions at Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Facilities. The report identifies City Departments as well as Non-City agencies with some level of over-site at the facility related to permitting and safety requirements for liquid bulk storage facilities. As the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) and Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) are already involved in some level of over-site efforts to address permitting and safety, we respectfully encourage San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United to continue working with LAFD and LADBS to address and resolve safety issues related to the operation of the facility. Aleta James, City Planner Office of Zoning Administration Nuisance Abatement /Revocation 213.978.1368 1 Odd spice that FIGHTS diabetes Can this unusual "super spice" control your blood sugar and fight diabetes? diabetesreversed .com 1 C-67 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United <sphomeunited@gmail.com> Monday, April 29, 2013 5:24 PM aleta.james@lacity.org michael.logrande@lacity.org; mrenvirlaw@sbc.global.net; Ricardo Hong; wgreuel@gmail.com; jacob.haik@lacity.org; eric.garcetti@lacity.org; marisol espinoza; william.carter@lacity.org; rkim@lacbos.org RE: RESPONSE TO LA REFUSAL TO FILE NUSAINCE ON RANCHO LPG spphu letter of response to nusaince apr.29, 2013.doc 1 C-68 San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United, Inc. April 29, 2013 Ms. Aleta Jam es City Planner Post Office Box 6455, San Pedro, CA 90734 Email: sphomeunited@gmail.com -Fax (310) 548-4255 L.A. City Planning Dept., Room 525 200 Spring Street Los Angeles, .CA 90012 RE: NUISANCE ABATEMENT: RANCHO LPG, SAN PEDRO Dear Ms. James: SPPHU disagrees with the Planning Departments decision to proceed because it 'does not find a basis for processing nuisance abatement against Rancho LPG under Municipal Code Section 12.27 .1.' My letter of March 25th, 2013, went into extensive detail as to why SPPHU believes nuisance abatement proceedings should be initiated. The Planning Department's over-simplistic response is cold and demonstrates the lack of concern for the more than 2,000 tax paying homeowners SPPHU represents. The extreme hazard that this facility represents to us, as well as to the thousands of others who live in the surrounding area, has been scientifically legitimized and makes this refusal by the Planning Department hard to comprehend. SPPHU respectfully requests and deserves a more defined basis that includes the specifics of the logical or legal reasoning for the refusal to proceed with this filing. It is hoped that your anticipated response will give us a better understanding of the issues involved. Sincerely, CL~~ Chuck Hart, President San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United (310) 833-0959 Cc: Michael LoGrande, L.A. Planning Director C-69 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: det31 O@juno.com Tuesday, April 30, 2013 5:28 PM Kit Fox Subject: Response e-mail letter of April 24th from L.A. Planning Department Mr. Hart, We have reviewed your request for the Planning Department to commence nuisance abatement proceedings with respect to Rancho LPG facility. At this time, please be advised that the Department dose not find a basis for processing under Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.27.1. Aleta James, City Planner Office of Zoni·ng Administration Nuisance Abatement /Revocation 213.978.1368 Woman is 53 But Looks 25 Mom reveals 1 simple wrinkle trick that has angered doctors ... ConsumerLifestyleMag.com 1 C-70 E-mails from Janet Gunter regarding Rancho LPG facility C-71 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Subject: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Tuesday, May 21, 2013 5:09 PM Betwixt1@yahoo.com; pmwarren@cox.net; hanslaetz@gmail.com; dwgkaw@hotmail.com; burling102@aol.com; marciesmiller@sbcglobal.net; fbmjet@aol.com; det31 O@juno.com; connie@rutter.us; chateau4us@att.net; Kit Fox; asantich@yahoo.com; wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov; meer.daniel@epa.com; helmlinger.andrew@epa.gov; don.holmstrom@csb.gov; dan.tillema@csb.gov; maurice_lyles@boxer.senate.gov; michael_davies@feinstein.senate.gov; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; lpryor@usc.edu; carl.southwell@gmail.com; elise.swanson@mail.house.gov; jacob.haik@lacity.org; hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; aaron.wilensky@mail.house.gov; niki.tennant@asm.ca.gov; norman.fassler-katz@sen.ca.gov; sally.magnani@doj.ca.gov; brian.hembacher@doj.ca.gov; fbmjet@aol.com; horsefam1@q.com; adcanizales@yahoo.com City Watch LA Article on Rancho Situation Do so wish something or someone would make a difference ........ submitted article below link: http://citywatchla.cbm/4box-left/5113-the-care-dare 1 C-72 The "Care" Dare Page 1of4 The "Care" Dare Details Written by Janet Schaaf-Gunter 21 May 2013 Font Size lilll&I VOICES -Japanese film maker Yojyu Matsubayashe has created a film dedicated to the Fukushima disaster. Matsubayashe laments, "It was human arrogance that led to this disaster. We shouldn't be making excuses that we didn't know .... we didn't care." There doesn't appear to be any singular reason for Tokyo Electric Power Co and the Nuclear Industry Safety Agency's failure to follow best practices and standards in their nuclear operation. However, there are a number of underlying causes that can be identified. NISA lacked independence from both government agencies responsible for promoting nuclear power as well as from industry. This appears to be the common thread that runs throughout our society in relationship to hazardous facilities associated with the chemical and energy trade. In the end, the Fukushima event does not reveal any unknown fatal flaw associated with nuclear power itself, but it does underscore the critical importance of periodically reevaluating all hazardous facilities, upgrading them to the highest level of safety, and creating an effective means to regulate and oversee safety management. Whether it is the catastrophe from Fukushima, San Bruno, Richmond, the Gulf, the recent West, Texas explosion or a pending disaster stemming from San Pedro's own Rancho liquefied petroleum gas facility, all have a connection to deficient safety resulting from an obduracy to recognize real risk exposures, and a purposeful avoidance in employing the latest and best safety practices. Recently the US Chemical Safety Board concluded their investigation of the Richmond Chevron refinery fire and publicly announced that the California State Regulations are "deficient" in ensuring public safety. At a CSB hearing on April 19th in Richmond, CA, CSB investigators also announced that "decisions made by Chevron both on Aug. 6 and in the decade before led to the massive -and preventable -fire." One has to seriously wonder just why it is that "we" are not paying attention to the kind of detail necessary to protect our public for an entire DECADE! And, in the case of Rancho LPG, you can multiply that DECADE times FOUR!! The consequences of ignorance have been clearly and repeatedly demonstrated without any resolve whatsoever to amending that behavior. The Nationally acclaimed "Master of Disaster'', Professor Bob Bea from UC Berkeley has been the prominent choice of the US in the investigation of the "why" of disasters such as "Katrina", "San Bruno", "The Gulf' etc. In the March issue of The Men's Journal, Bea (now in his late ?O's) acknowledges his fatigue in dealing with the aftermath of these horrific events and his frustration in the vivid realization that they have all been "preventable". http://citywatchla.com/4box-left/5113-the-care-dare?tmpl=component&print= 1 &layout=d... 512412013 C-73 The "Care" Dare Page 2of4 In the last few paragraphs of the article, Bea identifies the San Pedro situation as one that is keeping him engaged. When the reporter presses him on what he sees, his reply is "it is risky, very risky." This reference relates to Bea's review of the Rancho Liquefied Petroleum Gas facility's massive 25 Million gallon butane and propane storage and its potential of a "domino effect" upon other numerous ignition sources in the harbor with the capability of creating an inferno of unimaginable proportions. While many have labeled those involved in the fight against this ultra hazardous Rancho facility "extremists", certainly Professor Bea's acknowledgement of this facility as a matter of grave concern should ·turn the political heads needed to deliver a removal of the threat. However, the situation remains stagnant while the EPA and local politicians jockey around in some political dance to avoid "provoking" the LPG facility's Fortune 500 owners, Plains All American Pipeline. "Plains" has threatened to "sue" anyone that attempts to restrict their business opportunity. The immense 40 year old tank structures of this facility sit directly in the "rupture zone" of the active Palos Verdes Fault (mag. 7.3) in tanks built without building permits to a supposed seismic sub-standard of 5.5 - 6.0. The area is defined by USGS as "liquefaction and landslide" areas. Just the other day, there was a 4.0 mag. earthquake recorded 7 miles SW of San Pedro, and there has been a recent flurry of seismic events in the region. This LPG facility was introduced without benefit of a comprehensive risk analysis and expedited through a fragmented permitting process. It was instituted against the advice of the LA Fire Marshall and exempted from LA City Fire regulations at the time. This only scratches the surface of its corrupt initiation and lack of any true compliance to laws. Meanwhile, there were and are existing neighborhoods within 1,000 ft. of the facility along with multiple schools nearby. Not unlike the fertilizer operation in Texas who reported to the EPA that its risk for explosion was "zero", Rancho LPG has submitted a worst case blast radius of Y:z mile. A more accurate estimate of blast radius (using an EPA calculation) from only one of the two 12.5 million gallon tanks delivers a result of over 3 miles. This is a significant discrepancy but who is checking for the truth? The ill-advised union, ILWU, has buttressed Rancho's resolve by supporting them due to a paltry 6 union rail jobs employed by the facility. As we all know, union support of anything these days has become the gorilla strong arm in the political realm. This union support comes despite the tens of thousands of people (including their own union members both on the rail and on the adjacent docks) being jeopardized by this menacing operation under its extremely vulnerable conditions. This Union support has simply ratcheted up the intensity of the political dance. Sen. Barbara Boxer recently decreed the need for "hearings" on safety at refineries and chemical facilities after the West, TX disaster. However, her office continues to ignore our citizen pleas for intervention on Rancho LPG and our interest in participating in any effort exercised by the Senator to reduce such dangerous exposures from these facilities. http://citywatchla.com/4box-left/5113-the-care-dare?tmpl=component&print=l&layout=d... 5/24/2013 C-74 The "Care" Dare Page 3of4 Congresswoman Janice Hahn, who vowed 10 years ago to "fight" for relocation of the Rancho LPG facility as a City Councilwoman, continues to deliver hard rhetoric but stalls on any substantive action. Mayor Villaraigosa cautioned me personally as to the "expense" of trying to relocate the operation as simply "undoable". Certainly that option would be far less expensive than the $2.1 billion price tag realized from damages in San Bruno! And, it is obvious that damages from a catastrophe at Rancho, including potential decimation of the Port of LA, could far exceed that financial threshold. LA City Attorney, Carmen Trutanich labeled Rancho as "no more hazardous than the local gas station." Enough said. No mayoral or other LA City candidates in this May's election were even willing to publicly discuss the significance of this risky situation. It is simply too "hot" for any of them to handle. Perhaps, the most offensive of all is San Pedro's newest City Councilman, Joe Buscaino's circumvention of involvement. Buscaino ran his entire campaign on a promise of "Public Safety First"! Since taking office he has proposed toothless Council motions to address Rancho LPG that have remained lifeless for over a year. This perilous situation lingers while its potential for disaster increases daily. Those fearing the worst are left to wonder and ask, "why"? The truth of Matsubayashe's wisdom in identifying "arrogance" as being ultimately responsible for Fukushima's catastrophe takes on great poignancy. The message that the arrogance brought with it, comes screaming back as the most apparent answer to our own question ... "it isn't because we didn't know ... we didn't care." (Janet Schaaf-Gunter is a community activists and member of the San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United Inc. The SPPHU was one of the litigants in the successful China Shipping lawsuit that was represented by the NRDC in 2001-2003 on the issue of air pollution and aesthetics. Get more info: hazardsbeqone. com) -cw CityWatch Vol 11 Issue 41 Pub: May 21, 2013 http://citywatchla.com/ 4box-left/ 5113-the-care-dare ?tmpl=component&print= 1 &layout=d... 5/24/2013 C-75 The "Care" Dare C: Like ~ Send II 10 people like this. Be the first of your friends. Add a comment. .. ~ Post to Facebook Kathleen Woodfield · Los Angeles, California arrogant, self-preserving, ego-driven decision making ... an epidemic. Reply · iij 2 · Like· Follow Post · Wednesday at 09:03 IJ Facebook social plugin Tags: Page 4of4 0 http://citywatchla.com/4box-left/5113-the-care-dare?tmpl=component&print= 1 &layout=d... 512412013 C-76 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Subject: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:30 PM wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov; meer.daniel@epa.gov; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; aaron.wilensky@mail.house.gov; hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov; maurice _lyles@boxer.senate.gov; michael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; elise.swanson@mail.house.gov; jacob.haik@lacity.org; det31 O@juno.com; Kit Fox; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; connie@rutter.us; chateau4us@att.net; stanley.mosler@cox.net; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; lpryor@usc.edu; carl.southwell@gmail.com; pjwrome@yahoo.com Flurry of seismic activity in the South Bay ... largest today .. 4.0 mag. 7 mi. SW of San Pedro Rancho LPG tanks await the rupture opportunity ...... clearly, it is on the horizon .... but, how far??? http://www.dailybreeze.com/latestnews/ci 23250157/3-9-magnitude-earthquake-centered-rancho-palos-verdes 1 C-77 4.0-magnitude earthquake centered in Rancho Palos Verdes jolts South Bay -The Daily B... Page 1 of 1 4.0-magnitude earthquake centered in Rancho Palos Verdes jolts South Bay By City News Service Daily Breeze Posted: RELATED LINKS: • » Did you feel it? • »U.S. Geological Survey Web site • » Disaster prep guide • » ARE YOU PREPARED? DailyBreeze.com A magnitude-4.0 earthquake rattled portions of the South Bay today, but there were no immediate reports of.damage or injuries. The quake, which was originally reported with a magnitude of 3.9 but was quickly upgraded, struck at 1 p.m. six miles south of Rancho Palos Verdes and seven miles southwest of San Pedro, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. It was the latest in a series of temblors that have hit the Southland in recent weeks. Three quakes have struck in the Marina del Rey area --a magnitude-3.0 on Thursday afternoon, a magnitude-2.8 around 8 p.m. April 28 and a magnitude-3.2 quake around 8 p.m. April 26. http://www.dailybreeze.com/latestnews/ci_ 23250157 /3-9-magnitude-earthquake-centered-... 512412013 C-78 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Tuesday, May 14, 2013 10:13 PM aleta.james@lacity.org; michael.logrande@lacity.org; maurice_lyles@boxer.senate.gov; michael_davies@feinstein.senate.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov; elise.swanson@mail.house.gov; jacob.haik@lacity.org; richard.vladovic@lausd.net; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; Kit Fox; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov; meer.daniel@epa.gov; bea@ce.berkeley.edu det31 O@juno.com; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; connie@rutter.us; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; marciesmiller@sbcglobal.net; burling102@aol.com; pmwarren@cox.net; fbmjet@aol.com; owsqueen@yahoo.com; hanslaetz@gmail.com; fmillarfoe@gmail.com; lpryor@usc.edu; carl.southwell@gmail.com Chemical Safety Board results on Chevron Disaster. Note date of problem pipe & relevance to Rancho LPG This is highly relevant to the issue at Rancho and the corrosive opportunity (1973) of their LPG pipelines ... yet another red flag for officials and agencies to ignore?? http://richmondconfidential.org/2013/04/22/feds-approve-results-of-chevron-fire-investigation/ Janet Gunter 1 C-79 ~eds approve results of Chevron fire investi~ati2n I Richmond Confidential ~:::t-:;llichmondConfidential (http: //richmondconfidential.org/) Feds approve results of Chevron fire investigation By Sean Greene (http://richmondconfidential.org/author/sean- greene/} Posted April 22, 2013 12:00 pm On Aug. 6 of last year, an employee at the Chevron Richmond refinery noticed a puddle on the ground, the rough draft of a federal investigation says. The culprit: a five-foot carbon steel pipe leaking light gas oil 14 feet overhead. A group of managers and firefighters gathered to assess the situation. With no way to isolate the leak, a firefighter attempted to clamp the leak and pull away the pipe's insulation using a pike pole. At that point, no one saw a need to shut down the unit, the investigating agency U.S. Chemical Safety Board found. The firefighter's pike pole likely punctured the pipe, worsening the problem. After further attempts to fix the damaged pipe, installed in 1976 and now corroded to a dangerous thickness, failed, Chevron staff decided to shut down the unit. They were too late. A dense hydrocarbon cloud streamed from the pipe and engulfed 19 workers. Two minutes later, the cloud ignited. A firefighter trapped in his truck radioed for help. Hearing no response, he thought everyone else was dead and he fled through a "wall of fire," according to an animated video from the U.S. Chemical Safety Board that recreates the incident. Friday night, investigators from ~he CSB walked through the moments before the fire to show how, they said, decisions made by Chevron both on Aug. 6 and in the decade before led to the massive -and preventable -fire. In the long hearing in the Richmond Memorial Auditorium, the CSB approved a rough draft of conclusions and safety recommendations from their investigation. A final report will be released later this year. The fire at the Richmond refinery burned for hours that evening and sent a plume of smoke over Richmond and El Cerrito that could be seen from San Francisco. Over the coming weeks, more than 15,000 people sought medical attention after being exposed to the smoke. No one at the refinery was seriously injured or killed in the incident. The CSB determined the aged carbon steel pipe had thinned to the point of failure due to sulfidation corrosion. Carbon steel bears a particular risk of this kind of corrosion, and the low silicon-content in the pipe in the No. 4 crude unit at the refinery only accelerated the corrosion. Chevron had already determined in its own investigation that sulfidation corrosion caused the fire, but the oil company disagreed with the CSB's depiction of the incident, saying it oversimplified and trivialized decisions made by employees. Chevron previewed the animation and urged the agency not to release it because it contained "several factual inaccuracies." 1ttp://richmondconfidential.org/2013/04/22/feds-approve-results-of-chevron-fire-investigation/ Page 1 of'. 5/24/201'. C-80 < ecJ~-~PP!<?..~~_!~~~J_t_s_ qf gJ.!t.'.yi:.q!l _t!!~jJ.?-~t.'.§~ig_a~i~l! 1~~~9!1sl:_g?11ft~t.'.!1ti~l. _____ . _ _____ ___ _ _ ____ -, surely not intended, of demeaning the challenges faced by the responding personnel," refinery spokeswoman Melissa Ritchie said in an emailed statement. "The reasons behind the incident are far more complex than depicted in the animation and we are disappointed with the CSB's decision to go forward with this unfair depiction." The oil giant said it is cooperating with the CSB's safety recommendations, the progress of which can be tracked on its website Chttp://richmond.chevron.com/home/news/incidentresponse.aspx). The CSB said "permissive" requirements and the lack of a transparency allowed for the lapses in Chevron's inspection process. In 2002, company inspectors failed to document thinning pipes in the crude unit and in 2011 the company inspected some, but not all, sections of the unit. The CSB provided several safety recommendations, some urgent, to Chevron and to the State Legislature, Contra Costa County and the Richmond City Council. To Chevron, the recommendations include employing "Inherently Safer Systems," meaning the plant must use the best technology when repairing or replacing parts of the refinery. The state Department of Industrial Relations will oversee a new data-sharing system between 1,600 refineries and chemical plants in California. The idea is that transparency will drive safety in such plants, presenters said Friday. The CSB also recommended the county and city adopt more stringent regulations and require more transparency from Chevron. "I think the most important conclusion in your report is that this accident is not about pipe corrosion, but it's about corporate decision making," County Supervisor John Gioia said to the board Friday. "It's about the need to improve the safety culture and decision making at the refinery." A Chevron representative did not speak at the meeting, but refinery manager Nigel Hearne said recently the plant is taking steps to avoid future incidents. "The causes of the incident were multi-faceted," Hearne said in a statement last week. "The refinery's management and our entire workforce are implementing actions to address the issues underlying the August incident and as part of our commitment to continuous improvement." Mayor Gayle McLaughlin, speaking to the CSB, said the fire damaged the health and image of the city. In her six-minute speech, McLaughlin compared Richmond's relationship with Chevron to that of an abused spouse. "The next day after the abuse, the spouse comes and says to him or her 'I'm so sorry, it'll never again.' And it happens again and it happens again and it happens again," she said. "But sometimes, abused spouses wake up and abused communities wake up and that is going to happen and is happening in the Richmond community." McLaughlin said she plans to introduce a revised industrial safety ordinance to the City Council on May 21. tttp://richmondconfidential.org/2013/04/22/feds-approve-results-of-chevron-fire-investigation/ Page 2 of: 5/24/201'. C-81 < ~d~_ ~.P2~~~~_!~-~~l!~ gf g_h~Y_!_o_g fl!~ i!l~~~~i_g'1:.ti<?D: J B!c~Q_~d _G2.!lfld_e~t!~!_ __________________ _ accountability from corporations. "You could have all of these recommendations which is all good, but ... they mean nothing if you don't put them into practice," he said. "And that's the main thing that industry is not putting these things into practice. There's no punishment behind it." tttp://richmondconfidential.org/2013/04/22/feds-approve-results-of-chevron-fire-investigation/ Page 3 of: 5/24/201: C-82 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hello Mr. Meer- Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Thursday, May 09, 2013 6:06 PM Meer.Daniel@epa.gov Ryerson.Teddy@epa.gov; Helmlinger.Andrew@epa.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; elise.swanson@mail.house.gov; hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov; maurice _lyles@boxer.senate.gov; m ichael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; Kit Fox; Diamond.Jane@epa.gov; ZITO.KELL Y@EPA.GOV; Lawrence.Kathryn@epa.gov; Maier.Brent@epa.gov Re: EPA ACTION "RANCHO LPG" Thank you for your prompt reply. As you can probably guess, there has been incredible frustration endured by our homeowners in attempting to bring attention to this extremely hazardous site. Our quest to bring assurance of public safety to this particular facility has extended through four decades. Every decade has brought with it a significantly elevated opportunity of disaster from earthquake, terrorism, human error or infrastructure failure. The adjacent citi:z;ens of San Bruno, Fukushima, Richmond, the Gulf, and now West, Texas were basically clueless about their risk potential. San Pedro homeowners have known the jeopardy of this massive LPG facility and have pleaded with government and regulators to intervene. We are extremely grateful to finally have the EPA act now in the interest of public safety. We are hopeful that your investigation will provide the necessary action to remove the impending threat before disaster strikes. Most sincerely, Janet Gunter PS. Just an fyi. *In reviewing the criteria under General Duty, there is discussion of change in operation. It is important to note that Petrolane/Amerigas/Rancho LPG as a business .. conducted over 68% of their commodity's transport by sea for 30 years. That ocean transport was the mainstay of their operation with the ability to move 7 million gallons of butane and/or propane gas in a single ship move. The Port of LA cancelled their pipeline lease to a wharf in the inner harbor in 2004. That produced a major shift in their LPG business operation to transportation of ALL gas ... by rail and truck. It appears that this entirely new business should have required a new EIR process. This fact may impact their General Duty. -----Original Message----- From: Meer, Daniel <Meer.Daniel@epa.gov> To: arriane5 <arriane5@aol.com> Cc: Ryerson.Teddy <Ryerson.Teddy@epa.gov>; Helmlinger, Andrew <Helmlinger.Andrew@epa.gov>; lisa.pinto <lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov>; elise.swanson <elise.swanson@mail.house.gov>; hamilton.cloud <hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov>; maurice_lyles <maurice lyles@boxer.senate.gov>; michael_davies <michael davies@feinstein.senate.gov>; michael.picker <michael.picker@gov.ca.gov>; MrEnvirlaw <MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net>; bea <bea@ce.berkeley.edu>; kitf <kitf@rpv.com>; DIAMOND, JANE <Diamond.Jane@epa.gov>; Zito, Kelly <ZITO.KELLY@EPA.GOV>; Lawrence, Kathryn <Lawrence.Kathryn@epa.gov>; Maier, Brent <Maier.Brent@epa.gov> Sent: Thu, May 9, 2013 3:42 pm Subject: EPA ACTION "RANCHO LPG" Dear Ms Gunter: Thank you for your letter of May 8, 2013 and the attachments, regarding the Rancho LPG facility in San Pedro, California. As you know, U.S. EPA is currently engaged in an investigation of the Rancho LPG facility and consequently we are not in a position to discuss the details of that investigation beyond what has been made publically available. 1 C-83 U.S. EPA intends to use all appropriate tools to bring the Rancho LPG facility into regulatory compliance within applicable federal environmental laws. Sincerely, Daniel Meer Assistant Director Superfund Division Pacific Southwest Region U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 415.972.3132 meer.daniel@epa.gov 2 C-84 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dear Ms Gunter: Meer, Daniel <Meer.Daniel@epa.gov> Thursday, May 09, 2013 3:38 PM arriane5@aol .com Ryerson.Teddy; Helmlinger, Andrew; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; elise .swanson@mail.house.gov; ham ilton .cloud@mail.house.gov; maurice _lyles@boxer.senate.gov; m ichael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; Kit Fox; DIAMOND, JANE; Zito, Kelly; Lawrence, Kathryn; Maier, Brent EPA ACTION "RANCHO LPG" Thank you for your letter of May 8, 2013 and the attachments, regarding the Rancho LPG facility in San Pedro, California. As you know, U.S. EPA is currently engaged in an investigation of the Rancho LPG facility and consequently we are not in a position to discuss the details of that investigation beyond what has been made publically available. U.S. EPA intends to use all appropriate tools to bring the Rancho LPG facility into regulatory compliance within applicable federal environmental laws. Sincerely, Daniel Meer Assistant Director Superfund Division Pacific Southwest Region U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 415.972.3132 meer.daniel@epa.gov 1 C-85 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hello Mary- Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Wednesday, May 08, 2013 10:28 AM wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov blumenfeld.jared@epa.gov; helmlinger.andrew@epa.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; elise.swanson@mail.house.gov; hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov; maurice _lyles@boxer.senate.gov; michael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; Kit Fox EPA ACTION "RANCHO LPG": AND INCLUSION OF CLEAN AIR ACT GENERAL DUTY CLAUSE Gen_Duty_clause_NEJAC_letter_Harnessing_the_Unused_Authority_Greenpeace_2011_ 2pp.htm; Gen_Duty_Clause_Rancho_LPG_EPA_Show_ Cause_Letter_3_ 14_ 13.pdf; EPA_combined_guidance_Enforcement_Gen_Duty_Clause_etc_Sec_ 112_r_ceppo_06_20_ 2012_31 pp.pdf; EPA_ Gen_Duty_enforcement_use_ Valero_meraux_cafo_June_2012.pdf; EPA_Gen_Duty_not_limited_to_covered_chems_p_ 4 _Guidance_lnvolving_Workers_lnspections_caa_ 112r_2011.pdf; Gen_Duty_Clause_EPA_broad_authority_Admin_Judge_american_acryl_deny_dismissal_06 _02_ 11.pdf; Gen_Duty_Clause_EPA_uses_of_see_my_emails_more_ 4_28_29_2013 _after_ West_ disaster_ 4_29_ 13.doc; Gen_Duty_ Clause_teeth_8pp _memo_appliedehs_ com_ 2000_EPA_guidance.pdf; Gen_Duty_Clause_Using_it_OMB_watch_Center_for_Effective_Govt_2012_2pp.pdf Our Homeowners recently received the above attached documents from a contact in Washington DC. They mentioned that absent in the EPA's March demand to Rancho LPG on violations, is the Clean Air Act General Duty Clause ( Section 112 (r)(1 ), ... which might be needed to do the best job in addressing the Rancho LPG risks. As seen in some of the attachments, the EPA appears to be using this clause effectively in other places where the safety of the facility is so clearly in question. We want to urge the EPA to do all that they can to ensure that our region, its residents, and the ports are protected. Thank you, Janet Gunter San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United INC 1 C-86 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Subject: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Saturday, May 04, 2013 11 :37 AM Susan Brooks <Subrooks08@gmail.com>; Brian Campbell <b.camp@cox.net>; Jerry Duhovic; Jim Knight; Anthony Misetich; Carol Lynch <clynch@rwglaw.com>; Carolyn Lehr; Kit Fox; Mark Doddy; chateau4us@att.net; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; det31 O@juno.com; pjwrome@yahoo.com Rancho LPG liability exposure? FYl ... how extensive is the opportunity for damages from Rancho LPG? And, who and how will they pay? Questions that your RPV City Council has asked never answered. Greg Mitchell @Greg Mitch Criminal: Owner of Texas fertilizer plant that exploded had only $1 million in insurance--state may pay $loo million.bit.ly/126w9We 04:'19 AM·· 04May13 1 C-87 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Thursday, May 02, 2013 11 :00 PM Jeri.Siegel@calema.ca.gov aalva@fire.lacounty.gov; Brian.Abeel@calema.ca.gov; alexander.sanchez@nrgels.com; anna.olekszyk@lacity.org; Mona.Bontty@calema.ca.gov; bryank@bulk-dti.com; CDAubrey@chp.ca.gov; Annabelle.Dixon@calema.ca.gov; epupka@aqmd.gov; Gary.Shapiro@dtsc.ca.gov; Pastor.Guevara@calema.ca.gov; Douglas.Huls@calema.ca.gov; ktruong@carson.ca.us; lindaphillips@alum.calberkeley.org; LaNette.Long@calema.ca.gov; mlee@caps.usc.edu; mnagavedu@aqmd.gov; rlong@ochca.com; robertdistaso@ocfa.org; neverley.shoemake@calema.ca.gov; slichten@enviroservices.com; Sshrub@memorial.org; tania.bonfiglio@ladwp.com; vincent.sato@lacity.org; asalmen@responsegroupinc.com; rabrams@countyofsb.org; Jim.Acosta@calema.ca.gov; akira.yoshimura@bp.com; fisheral@epa.gov; allen_o'neil@longbeach.gov; Trevor.Anderson@calema.ca.gov; byu@fire.lacounty.gov; brunothehunter33@hotmail.com; bhanley@octa.net; cdeaton@fcc.gov; cdiep@dhs.ca.gov; ccarter@hazardreduction.net; Joseph .Crisologo@cd ph .ca.gov; David.Rasmussen@dtsc.ca.gov; DanC@TCRINDUSTRIES.Com; Dan.Reed@linde.com; dguillory@mwdh2o.com; darrell_dennis@kindermorgan.com; DCheng@ochca.com; ethomas@nesglobal.net; earl.whitley@dot.ca.gov; emedgerton@earthlink.com; fernando _ benavides@kindermorgan.com; George.Baker@dtsc.ca.gov; grivera@ocsd.com; gstaylor@socal.rr.com; Jack.Harrah@calema.ca.gov; jarzaga@memorialcare.org; jherberg@ocsd.com; jlane@semprautilities.com; jbushnel@bis.doc.gov; sampsonjj@verizon.net; jessica.falcon@hq.dhs.gov; jim.wada@ventura.org; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; Sherryl.Jones@calema.ca.gov; jagbc15@hotmail.com; justin.diedolf@losangeles.af.mil; klew@torranceca.gov; karen@kmhazmatservices.com; lwalters@fire.lacounty.gov; m kazarians@kazarians.com; markshemaria@yahoo.com; Bill.Martinez@calema.ca.gov; Diana.Melroe@calema.ca.gov; Ardito.Michael@epa.gov; mshort@fire.lacounty.gov; mike_albarran@longbeach.gov; Edward.Newman@calema.ca.gov; patricio.romero@sce.com; pbeswick@mwdh2o.com; phillip.langhus@edwards.af.mil; rlehmann@co.riverside.ca.us; Roy.Yeaman@dtsc.ca.gov; rltaylor2@paalp.com; P0107 @lapd.lacity.org; rlinton@simivalley.org; ronald .conrow@plainsm id stream .com; stephen.melvin@oursafetowns.com; stsumura@elsegundo.org; Steve.Baker@ventura.org; zach.streeter@linde.com; maurice _lyles@boxer.senate.gov; michael_davies@feinstein.senate.gov; Kit Fox; wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: May 8, 2013 LEPC meeting agenda Attachments: Rancho_LPG_-_EPA_Show_Cause_Letter.pdf; NY_ Times_on_West,_ TX_explosion.pdf Thank you for the agenda. I noticed that I (Janet Gunter's email) is on the "old agenda items" for review .... certainly seems appropriate! I am hoping that the group will not take such umbrage at my critique of the group that you lose sight of how you might be able to re-focus the group in a direction that might honor the goals of the LEPC better and serve the safety of all in a more effective way. I would like for you to read the article at the link attached paying close attention to the last few paragraphs: http://www.mensjournal.com/magazine/bob-bea-the-master-of-disaster-20130225?page= I also am attaching the EPA demand on Rancho LPG, the West Texas NY Times article and the link to the Chemical Safety Board's recent admission that California regulations are not strong enough to ensure public safety. These are all very important things for you to discuss. http://www. vcstar. com/news/2013/apr/05/feds-say-cal if-shou ld-bolster-refi nery-oversig hU The article on the West, Texas explosion vividly paints the picture of the situation at Rancho LPG. While the West, Texas refinery was in "total compliance" it clearly was not safe. That is certainly the situation at Rancho LPG. Over all these years of attending meetings of your committee, I have received the sense that not only Steve Tsumura, but also a number of other fire representatives have well understood the jeopardy that residents have been faced with due to the LPG facility. It was also felt that the same members have been wrestling with the issue of helplessness in moving toward any responsible action due to constraints of "compliance". That should not get in anyone's way ... as the most critical issue is the genuine safety of our people. I hope that you will ... regardless of your association to industry or government...do the "right" thing. That is all any of our residents have ever wanted. Profits do not trump "people". If your group cannot "protect" the people ... then, at least "warn" them. There is no preparedness 1 C-88 for the explosion and combustion of 25 million gallons of butane. Please. You are not so powerless. Do something. Janet Gunter -----Original Message----- From: Siegel, Jeri@CalEMA <Jeri.Siegel@calema.ca.gov> To: Siegel, Jeri@CalEMA <Jeri.Siegel@calema.ca.gov> Cc: A. Alva <aalva@fire.lacounty.gov>; Abeel, Brian@CalEMA <Brian.Abeel@calema.ca.gov>; Alexander Sanchez <alexander.sanchez@nrgels.com>; Anna Olekszyk <anna.olekszyk@lacity.org>; Bontty, Mona@CalEMA <Mona.Bontty@calema.ca.gov>; Bryan Keegan <bryank@bulk-dti.com>; Aubrey, Calvin D@CHP <CDAubrey@chp.ca.gov>; Dixon, Annabelle@CalEMA <Annabelle.Dixon@calema.ca.gov>; Ed Pupka <epupka@aqmd.gov>; Shapiro, Gary@DTSC <Gary.Shapiro@dtsc.ca.gov>; Guevara, Pastor@CalEMA <Pastor.Guevara@calema.ca.gov>; Huls, Douglas@CalEMA <Douglas.Huls@calema.ca.gov>; Ky Truong <ktruong@carson.ca.us>; Linda Phillips <lindaphillips@alum.calberkeley.org>; Long, LaNette@CalEMA <LaNette.Long@calema.ca.gov>; Michelle Lee <mlee@caps.usc.edu>; Mohan Nagavedu <mnagavedu@aqmd.gov>; rlong <rlong@ochca.com>; Robert Distaso <robertdistaso@ocfa.org>; Shoemake, Neverley@CalEMA <neverley.shoemake@calema.ca.gov>; Steve Lichten <slichten@enviroservices.com>; Steve Shrub <Sshrub@memorial.org>; Tania Bonfiglio <tania.bonfiglio@ladwp.com>; Vincent Sato <vincent.sato@lacity.org>; A. Salmen <asalmen@responsegroupinc.com>; Abrams, Richard <rabrams@countyofsb.org>; Acosta, Jim@CalEMA <Jim.Acosta@calema.ca.gov>; Akira Yoshimura <akira.yoshimura@bp.com>; Al Fisher (fisheral@epa.gov) <fisheral@epa.gov>; Allen O'Neil <allen_o'neil@longbeach.gov>; Anderson, Trevor@CalEMA <Trevor.Anderson@calema.ca.gov>; Dixon, Annabelle@CalEMA <Annabelle.Dixon@calema.ca.gov>; Arriane <Arriane5@aol.com>; Barbara C. Yu <byu@fire.lacounty.gov>; Bruno Loran <brunothehunter33@hotmail.com>; Bryan Hanley (bhanley@octa.net) <bhanley@octa.net>; C. Deaton <cdeaton@fcc.gov>; C. Diep <cdiep@dhs.ca.gov>; Craig Carter <ccarter@hazardreduction.net>; 'Crisologo, Joseph (CDPH-DDWEM)' (CDPH-DDWEM)' <Joseph.Crisologo@cdph.ca.gov>; Rasmussen, David@DTSC <David.Rasmussen@dtsc.ca.gov>; Dan Coots <DanC@TCRINDUSTRIES.Com>; Dan Reed <Dan.Reed@linde.com>; Daniel Guillory <dguillory@mwdh2o.com>; Darrell Dennis <darrell_dennis@kindermorgan.com>; Darwin Cheng <DCheng@ochca.com>; Huls, Douglas@CalEMA <Douglas.Huls@calema.ca.gov>; Earl Thomas <ethomas@nesglobal.net>; Earl Whitley <earl.whitley@dot.ca.gov>; Eileen Edgerton <emedgerton@earthlink.com>; Fernando Benavides <fernando_benavides@kindermorgan.com>; Baker, George@DTSC <George.Baker@dtsc.ca.gov>; G. Rivera <grivera@ocsd.com>; Glen Taylor <gstaylor@socal.rr.com>; Harrah, Jack@CalEMA <Jack.Harrah@calema.ca.gov>; J. C. Arzaga <jarzaga@memorialcare.org>; J. Herberg <jherberg@ocsd.com>; J. Lane <jlane@semprautilities.com>; J.Bushnel <jbushnel@bis.doc.gov>; Jennifer Sampson <sampsonjj@verizon.net>; Jessica Falcon <jessica.falcon@hq.dhs.gov>; Jim Wada <jim.wada@ventura.org>; Jody James <jody.james@sbcglobal.net>; Jones, Sherryl@CalEMA <Sherryl.Jones@calema.ca.gov>; Juan Gonzalez <jagbc1 5@hotmail.com>; Justin Diedolf <justin.diedolf@losangeles.af.mil>; K. Lew <klew@torranceca.gov>; Karen McKabney <karen@kmhazmatservices.com>; L. Walters <lwalters@fire.lacounty.gov>; M. Kazarians <mkazarians@kazarians.com>; Mark Shemaria <markshemaria@yahoo.com>; Martinez, Bill@CalEMA <Bill.Martinez@calema.ca.gov>; Melroe, Diana@CalEMA <Diana.Melroe@calema.ca.gov>; Michael Ardito (Ardito.Michael@epa.gov) <Ardito.Michael@epa.gov>; Mike Short <:mshort@fire.lacounty.gov>; Mike ZAlbarran <mike_albarran@longbeach.gov>; Newman, Edward@CalEMA <Edward.Newman@calema.ca.gov>; Patricio Romero <patricio.romero@sce.com>; Paul Beswick <pbeswick@mwdh2o.com>; Phil Langhus <phillip.langhus@edwards.af.mil>; R.Lehmann<rlehmann@co.riverside.ca.us>; Yeaman, Roy@DTSC <Roy.Yeaman@dtsc.ca.gov>; Rick Taylor <rltaylor2@paalp.com>; robert Payan (P0107@lapd.lacity.org) <P01 O?@lapd.lacity.org>; Ron Linton <rlinton@simivalley.org>; Ronald Conrow <ronald.conrow@plainsmidstream.com>; Stephen Melvin <stephen.melvin@oursafetowns.com>; Steve Tsumura <stsumura@elsegundo.org>; Steve.Baker <Steve.Baker@ventura.org>; Zach Streeter <zach.streeter@linde.com> Sent: Thu, May 2, 2013 12:02 pm Subject: May 8, 2013 LEPC meeting agenda Attached is the agenda for the May 8, 2013 LEPC meeting to be held at the Cal EMA Southern Region Office from 10:00 -12:00. The location is: Joint Forces Training Base 4671 Liberty Avenue Los Alamitos 2 C-89 Jeri Siegel Emergency Services Coordinator California Emergency Management Agency 200 N. Halcyon Road Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Phone(805)473-3035 Fax (805) 473-3036 Cell (805) 679-1998 24 Hour (916) 845-8911 Jeri.Siegel@calema.ca.gov 3 C-90 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hello Maurice- Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Thursday, May 02, 2013 6:40 PM maurice _lyles@boxer.senate.gov m ichael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; Kit Fox; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; don.holmstrom@csb.gov; dan.tillema@csb.gov; lpryor@usc.edu; wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov Rancho LPG Hazard ... the next West, Texas explosion ... but, "worse" ... and we are on the precipice! la_times_apr4_ 1977.pdf; la_timesjul16_ 1977.pdf; Rancho_LPG_-_EPA_Show_Cause_Letter.pdf Thank you for the conversation this morning. I hope that you will understand the urgency of this problem and the relevance it has to Sen. Boxer's most recent calling for "hearings" on the Texas explosion. As I told you, the Rancho LPG facility should be the "poster child" for the next imminent disaster due to . deficiencies related to oversight and proper identification of worst case at these ultra hazardous sites. It is very, very clear that worst case scenarios, as submitted by operators, are escaping any real scrutiny and are being taken as "creed" by jurisdictional agencies. In the case of the succeeding owners of this facility, Petrolane/Amerigas/Rancho LPG (the last of which is owned by Plains All American Pipeline) the site has been ignored for years of its high risk exposure. It is disheartening to know that our meeting with Rafi Nazarians at your office never triggered any action. Nazarians was sent multiple documents prior to our meeting and more over the past few years by our homeowners organization. Some of those documents include the above LA Times stories from 1977, Governor Brown's subsequent report confirming inappropriate exemptions given the facility during development with directives that have never been followed, USGS maps and LA City documents identifying the site of the tanks and LPG facility as being in an "Earthquake Rupture Zone" (7.3 mag.) as well as "Liquefaction" and "Landslide" areas ... etc. etc. Because this issue has such a LONG history .... and, frankly ... I'm sick to death of repeating the story .... I have attached below a copy of my recent email to the Chemical Safety Board which has the link to Professor Bob Bea's latest article in the Men's Journal. Please have a look at it. It is an unbelievable asset to have the opinion on the Rancho LPG facility from the "premiere authority" on catastrophic risk available to us. This is verifiable proof that the risk of this facility is too extreme to continue to ignore. Since the Chemical Safety Board has also recently identified California regulations as being too deficient to properly protect public safety, Senator Boxer should be well equipped to take on a strong leadership role to protect not only the local population ... but, moreover, the largest combined ports (LA & Long Beach) in our nation. Both of these ports fall within the 3.6 mile blast radius of a single (there are two) 12.5 Million Gallon Butane tank at Rancho LPG. If you cannot find the additional documents mentioned, or if you desire any further documentation, please let me know. We have so much documentation on this facility that it is cumbersome. Also, important to note is that the Port and City of LA are in control of a revocable, renewable .. monthly roll over rail permit that services this facility. Since the cancellation of their pipeline lease to a wharf at the port, this is the mainstay of their operation. It would be prudent for the City to revoke that permit until the facility has complied with a comprehensive risk analysis that proves the facility to be "safe" along with validation of proper "insurance" (commensurate with potential damages). I am also attaching a recent EPA complaint on Rancho that is to be complied with by the 15th of this month. Although we welcome that complaint...compliance to it will not even begin the kind of measures that would be necessary to ensure proper public safety. We desperately need disclosure of the high risk of this facility and intervention immediately to prevent a disaster of historic proportions. We look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible. 1 C-91 Janet Gunter Member, San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United INC -----Original Message----- From: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> To: don.holmstrom <don.holmstrom@csb.gov>; dan.tillema <dan.tillema@csb.gov> Sent: Thu, May 2, 2013 9:02 am Subject: West, TX and Rancho LPG .... "Birds of a Feather" Hello again- 1 just returned from Italy a few days ago. While there, I learned from CNN of the West, Texas refinery explosion. The parallels of Rancho LPG and that facility are incredible. Basically, simply said .... "They were in total compliance" with the EPA while their real disaster potential remained conveniently ... and purposely unidentified! EXACTLY THE SAME AS RANCHO LPG! While this obfuscation of the truth seems to run rampant in the government system ... it is far from acceptable. It is imperative that the obvious risk exposure to such catastrophe be identified "before" the disaster. These deadly omissions must be responded to and rectified immediately! The Chemical Safety Board should lead the way to that prudent disclosure. Please tell me the status of your Board's discussion of the Rancho LPG situation and any other findings of the Richmond disaster from your hearing on Apr. 19th that might apply to our situation here in San Pedro. I can't remember if I have sent you the link to the article on Professor Bea in the Men's Journal from this March. However, in this national article, Bea clearly identifies San Pedro as a problem location due to Rancho LPG. See the last few paragraphs if nothing else. http://www.mensjournal.com/magazine/bob-bea-the-master-of-disaster-20130225?page= Please know that the concern and disclosure on deficient California state regulations that you and the CSB have expressed from the Richmond disaster is appreciated. We are also grateful for your communication and concern on our own matter with this ultra-hazardous LPG facility. The situation down here should have never happened .... and the worst thing is that we all know it and are powerless in changing it thus far after 40 years. It doesn't seem to make a bit of difference that everyone (including government officials) understands the volatility and extreme potential for decimation that exists. Please .... use whatever influence that the CSB has in bringing sanity to a situation that is incredibly out of control. The safety of thousands of innocent people here is at stake. Please advise us on any other steps that we might be able to take with your Board to move further on the Rancho situation. Did you receive the video that we sent? We look forward to hearing from you. Thanks so much, Janet Gunter San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners INC 2 C-92 Two San Pedro LPG Tanks Worry Officials LARRY PRYOR Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File); Apr4, !977; ProQuest Historical Newspapers Los Angeles Times (1881 -1987) pg.Cl ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-, Blocked due to copyright. See full page image or microfilm. 'ONE OF OUR GRAVEST CONCERNS' -The two LPG tank• In Son Pedro and mop showlnQ their close proxlmitv to the Polos Verdes Fault. limes Poto bJ Sieve Foataalal ftom ltMPC h1bcopler Time. map 111 loha S11der Two San Pedro LPG Tanks Worry Officials Liquefied Petroleum Gas Facility Was Built Without Risk Analysis BY LARRY PRYOR TltnuStaffWrllfl' Two storage tanks conlalnlng a highly hazardoua substance, liquefied petroleum ps, are operallng near a densely papulated area in San Pedro, although the faclllty was bU!lt with· :r~~ ~~i::.iti.m: .f1m~':1"~~~~~ The $9 million fuel storage and dis· trlbullon raclllty, built by Petrclane, Inc .. ol Long Beach 111 1913, suddenl:I has come under orflclal scruUny as a result of Increasing controversy over lh!~l:Ya~lfcyr~ ~~~~gravest concerns.'' said Los Angeles Fire Marshal John C. Gerard. "LPG bu some of tbe same pr:r.rlies as LNG i::~e::~~ ::i·:~~ pllne." But in contrast With the Intense re· =~li~~:i~~.:n~ for Calilom~. the San Pedro LPG terminal went through a fragmented permit proceas and much oflts opera- tion is unregulated, As a tesull, state and local officials now believe the Petrolane faclllty has serious safety problems. For example: -The storage tanks, which have. a cspacity of 25 million gallons, are m the immediate vlclnll.Y of a potenllal· ~e:.f!v;.~~1~t~:.u1;~1~c: and a loading area for trucks and rail· road tank cars. There is a drive-In movie theater ~.;~~>;.!i1:.~~ ~ :~1af.~ feel to the west One school ls about 2,000 feel from the facility and two others are slighUy more than a mile "";.86';, site ts zoned by the city of Los Angeles for heavy lnduatrlal use but is adjacent lo resldenllal zoning. "This dOOBn'l make any more sense than building an outhouse upstream," said one fire olficlal. "There should be a general plan for the Harbor District that addresses Itself to safety and lso· !ates hasardoua cargoes." Part of Petrolane's predicament Is both a groWlng awareness of hazard· OllS mslerlals and new Information that bu come to light since tbe project was conceived. "We asked ourselves If this was a good sale place for the faclllty and we believed It was." said Joh11 lll'ay, an Investment ofllcer and 11POkesman for Petrolane. "We deStgl1ed it and con- structed It In excess of the require· ments. That was a voluntary act ••• We compiled with the law." When ii COIJ)eS lo hazards, •af•IY experts class LPG-which In Its COll\• merciallY marketable form Is mosUy propane-In a category of Its own. And Its use ls becoming more wide· spread. ~Ince tne J93US, propane has been used as a fuel In rural areas not The nearest home is ~=~~llue1¥'i:::~at~ 11:U;!~1~ut about l ,OOO feet away In recen~eais, It bu been lncreas- from the tanks. }~f !ci as m. =e= %:1~~~~ illlO''""•"' , 1 1 =:-ed with 11alu.ral gas curtail· portsUon of LPG in specially desl!/?,ed =rsa:Jf.! on1~~ ~I=~~! trolane's San P:cl';;: terminal, the only one in the state capable of slorlng LPG Imports by ship, received Its first delivery last November. A second large distributor, Callfor· g~~~q:f!u~fa~~'l'Y·1~s&~~~i~~s: County In the Bay Area, although that pt'Qjecl bu been delayed because of adverse public aplnion. abie°'tou;,~n~O::,l~~e!~~:~:.~~ with remarkably little allenlion. Be· cause of the peculiar regulatory sla· tus of LPG compared with other sub· stances, the company had to seek a minimal number of permits. One was from llie regional Coast- tine Commtsston, which In October, 1973, unanlmoualy voled to approve IMMI LPG is so powerful that tbe military uses it in concussion bombs. revisions to the berth and construc-:'J.. °!e~~f1J~l[\,~ .~~ ~~:.~e But the public nollc:e of Pelrolane's hearing made no menUon of LPG, saying only that the permit lnvolved "installation of a permanently mount· ed marine arm, with two connecting burled steel plpelineB.'' The collllDlsslon's staff, relying on the analysis of the Los Angeles clly Engineering Department, recom- mended approval of the pennlL "We didn't have any Idea or what that fa- cility was all about," one staff mem- berssid. an earthquake design criteria far be-When refrigerated to 44 degrees nal below zero at kept 111\der F...,..,,.• low that of a proposed LNG term! the propane turns Into a liquid, which Petrolane also needed, and re. for Los Angeles Harbor. makes ii convenient to transport and ceived, the approval or the J:.os An· -The U>s Angeles Fire Depart· store. · geles Harbor Commission to build the ~~~~e~~~: ~=C::,~:" i:1~dinJ A stale Energy Commission report ~:=port· ~iJJ"wl~~~ru::=ss~~~ bring In as many as 20 L'PG tankers a on LFG estimated that about 570 mil· th Jllad year, is inadequate. The L'PG wharf ~l~~nsth:~3= r~i~~~~/1~ =:n J ~~~~~the :Ji~ also is within 15() feet of other com· clent, clean-burning fuel Is rising Verdes Faull and avoided discussing busllble materials-a lumber yard about5% per year. hazardousaBpectsofLPG. an~ aT~ 00il5;~~~agee 'aarecfUa.ty Is u•~M'"'ed, But the Increased demand means "Control measures are so stringent " -.... '' ,.,._. LPG eompanleS no longer can rely on during sblp unloading op&rauons that and lls personnel are unlicensed. No domestic sources of LPG, which so rar a large-9uant11y spill is ei<tremely standards are In elfecl to regulate the have met all but about 10% of de· unllkel)t, the EIR said. "If by chance 6,()(1().foot pipeline from the wharf to mand. They are planning to Import liquid propane contacted harbor area ~: ~!~~~ f~1ur,'tion or ~~:~ rrom Venezuela and :CC:· ~~;'!'Ji.1:11~~ ;;~.;'l~~ The pipeline from the wharf to the Some energy analysts predlcl there gueous rorm which would then storage tanks goes under the Harbor will be a worldwide surplus of LPG In quickly disperse." ~oraewayaraeandaalt o2ng1 0 GNaf.fe;i_:,~eLy Th 1 •5 •, 1980, which would tend to drive the But interviews with safety special- •• ge Ill Gan• price down and make it competitive lsts and a revlew of the literature on complex of olCices and OQUlpmenL in· with £uel oil Imports would then In LPG accidents failed to confirm such eluding the large, white storage creue substintlally. • a prediction. tanks, pressure vessels, compresson The trend toward large-scale Im· LPG ls such a powerful explosive that II ls used by the Defense Depart· ment In concussion bombs. These weapons were employed In Vietnam to create, among other things, Instant helicopter pads In the jungle and are now being sought by the Israell government because they are the only bomb that can penetrate Egypt's underground jet hangers. .:.::.1~e~e~~:~::n1n:~:ii of accidents to J0,000-gallon tank trucks and railroad cars. The flreB and explosions from these Incidents are among the worst lndustrlal accidents onreciord. What would hsppen If 25 milllon gallons of LPG were released 10 the almosphere or were subjected to In· tense heat while sllll in their storage tanks In not known. LPG Is more easily Slored and transported than LNG tiecause ii does ~~ h&i~w1:ii.\',"f: : .. ~:!~ti:; and tends to rise when II vaporizes. LPG ls a heavy gas and hugs the ground, msldng ii difficult to disperse. LPG ls highly Oammsble and there is evldence that an unconfined pro- pane air cloud will explode. LPG tanks exposed to fire can detonate with enormous force, a phenomenon known as a "BLliJVE." which Is pro· nounced "blevey" and stands for "bolling llqU!d expanding vapor ex- plosions." One such explosion In Kingman. Ariz., In 1973, for example, involved the rupture of a railroad lank car that killed 13 persons and Injured 95 oth- ers. The fireball rose several hundred feet In a mushroom cloud and wu 800 to 1,000 feet In diameter. One evaluation of fragments from 84 LPG tank car accidenllll explo$ions showed that at least 20% of the frag- ments traveled more than 1,000 leet. Another study •hawed that 41$ of the tank car accidents involving a re- leue of LPG resulted in an explosion and 25% In a fire. Please 'l'urn to Pare 8, Col. I Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. C-93 Gas Tan ks Worry Officials 1972 by Converse, Davis & Associates, but the studY was not made part of the public record by the regional CoasUine CommisSion, the Harbor Department or the PUC. · Robert A. Reid, manager of engineering ser· Vices for Petrolane, said the consulting firm cal· culated that the Palos Verdes Fault was about a mile to the north of the facility. It was therefore built to withstand an earthquake of 6 magnitude on the Richter scale and a peak ground force acceleration of .35 of the force of gravity. Continued from First Page Data on the accident rate of fixed storage fa· cilities is ~arse because no federal agency has responsibility for these facilities, and accident reports are not required. One study done last year by the llT Research Institute of Chicago concluded: "There are as many explosions and/ or serious fires at fixed installations as there are LPG transportation accidents." · There also Is evidence of an increase of ac· cldents involving fixed facilities. An article in Fire Command pointed out that "in the five years since 1970 there has been a dramatic In· crease in the number of fatalities and injuries as the result of BLEVEls." Twelve Incidents re· ported resulted in the death of 18 fire fighters and six Civilians, With injuries to 300 persons. The January issue of LP-Gas. a trade journal, said "several major accidents over the past two years, resulting in extraordinary claims, have left the Insurance companies jittery and skepti· cal of tile risks involved in issuing LPG dealers coverage." As a result, the journal said, liability insur· ance costs have escalated sharply, amounting to 29.5 % of one dealer's total 1977 projected costs and only two major insurance companies are now quoting a price for LPG liability. hazards Involved" and a reliance on other regu • latory bodies to handle safety problems. Among concerns raised by the coastal com- mission's staff: -The increase in LPG vessel traffic that will result from the project. -The suitability of the berth at the' terminal. -The potential land use conflicts and safety hazards presented by the project's "prOXimlty to open flame sources, lumber storage yards, pe· troleum storage and residential activities." Although the Los Angeles Fite Department initially approved the Petrolane project in 1973, an internal department memorandum dated January 26 raises a number of problems con- nected with the marine terminal and recom • mends that the wharf be rebuilt, this time out of concrete. · It also pointed out that all electrical installa- tions In the terminal should be surveyed by the Department of Building and Safety's electrical division. · Reid said these values were considerably above what was required by the city's Uniform Building Code and the company had decided to use conservative assumptions on seismic activi- ty. Moreover, Reid said, the storage site, which is carved Into a hill below a Union Oil Co. re· finery, had "foundation conditions that are the best in the South Coast Basin. That Is San Pedro sandstone, which Is a very hard structure and had construction advantages." But published maps by the U.S. Geological Survey, the state DiVlslol) of Mines and Ge~IOJIY and the Los Angeles Planning Department 111di- cate the fault is closer to the Petrolane facility than one mile. Although the scale of these maps is not precise enough to be site-specific, they show the fault running immediately adjacent to the property. The Petrolane terminal, because of the way the city'a building-safety and fire codes are written, received piecemeal Inspection from the The fault does not break the surface at this · Department of BUiiding and Safety. The two point and slopes at an angle about 2,000 feet I large storage tanks, for example, were built down. Geologists therefore refer to it as a fault without a city building permit, according to zone and the Petrolane facility Is shown on the I public records. city's seismic map as lying within that zone. 1 Petrolane's spokesman, John May, said the The building code exempts a storage tank for The Palos Verdes Fault is considered "poten· company had been handling LPG for 50 years flammable fiuids from the permit and Inspection tiallY active," which means it has showed no ' and "we can't see propane as an onerous mater-"' 1111 l'"m"i . taum si,!!.!1 ofhmovement In recent limes, or within iai. It isn't unusually difficult to handle and ·· a.,.,ut t e last 11,000 years. we've been handling It safely." ,. bl" h d h th GeoJoglsts, nevertheless, treat It with respect. The safety of the Petrolane facility In San rU IS e maps S OW e Pacific Lighting's proposed LNG plant also Pedro has been questioned at the state and local f au/t running adjacent to the would lie within the Palos Verdes Fault zone, level recently for a number of reasons, not the San Pedro property. but Dames and Moore, the seismic consultants least being the expioSion of the oil tanker San· for the LNG project. have recommended antici· sinena last fall, which reminded the public that ~ m .&& 1 iii~ u JI Illa paling a 6.5 magnitude earthquake on the Palos the Port of Los Angeles was Indeed there. Verdes Fault and ground accelerations totaling An application by pacific Lighting Corp. to process If the tank is built with a dike a."Ound it. .7 of the force of gravltY, counting both vertical locate an LNG terminal In the harbor has The dike is supposed to contain the fluU If the and horizontal movement. stirred further Interest in port safety, including tank ruptures. One seismic consultant, Dr. Jim Slosson, for· an Investigation by a multiagency Hazardous The storage tanks at the Petrolane facility mer state geologist and now with Engin~ering Cargo Task Force. are not diked, but a section of the National Fire Geology Consultants, Inc .. of Van Nuys, consld- But Petrolane, itself, is forcing the Issue by Protection .Assn.'s <NFPA) LPG code says that ers the maximum credible earthquake for the proposing to import about 120 mUlion gallons a dike Is not necessary "where spillage of hyd· Palos Verdes Fault to be 7 magnitude. On a per year of propane through Its San Pedro facil • ~ogrcarapbohy~ can be adequately contained by top-project he worked on recently, Slosson estimat- lty, starting the third quarter of next year. The ed peak accelerations to be 6 Gs at three company expects to offload a large LPG tanker Tlierefore, the Petrolane tanks, if ruptured, fourths of a mile from the fault.· • In the harbor every 19 to 23 days. would now Into a catchbasln built below them. "This (Slosson's prediction), is a credible The main customer for this fuel would also be But both the NFPA code and the city Fire Code event." said Dr. Roger Sherburne, a seismolo- Pacific Lighting, which lllans to take the pro-state that the capacity of the basin need only be gist with the state Division of Mines and Geolo- pane to Wilmington by pipeline. put it in a pro-sufficient for the contents of one tank. gy. posed air-mixing plant and inject it into its gas Although the Petrolane tanks can hold 25 Because of the way state laws and regulations t Th . ld b b t 2"' f million gallons of LPG, documents show that · ti f ill b' sys em. 1s propane wou e a ou ,. o the basin below the tanks has a capacity of 13 are wntten, an elds ng ac ty not su iect to a Southern California's ly. million gallons. One fire official explained that It seismic safety review and containment of ha- To do this, Paci ting's subSidiary, was considered hlgh!Y unlikely that both tanks zardous materials has been given a low priorlt,y. Southern Calirornia Gas. .. applied to the would rupture simultaneously. "The state is just getting Into this whole busi· state Public Utilities Commission for a certifi· ness" said Peter Stromberg, a seismic safety cate to build the mixing facility, a step that Petrolane's May pointed out that the nature specialist with the state SeiSmic Safety Com- would ordinarily require an environmental im· of the storage tanks provide a conservative mission. "For some reason, we just haven't got- pact reporL measure of protection, since they are double-ten Into the energy field.'' The examiner in the case, however, conclud-walled and have a layer or insulation between Each local, state or federal agency contacted ed that safety questions involved were '1nsjgni· the two shells. by The Times said it had either no jurisdiction ficant" and proposed fsSUing a "negative decla-Storage tanks also are known for their ability over the Petrolane facility or jurisdiction over ration, "which would exempt the gas com£.any to withstand destruction durin~ severe earth-only a particular aspect of it. from having to prepare an EIR and ad ess qquuaakkees.of Th!s196', anwdasthperoSanvedFedmunanngdo thearthe Alquasakkae An official with the federal Office of Pipeline questions or vessel Safety or the operation of of l9'1l. • Safety, for example, said the 6,000-foot pipeline the storage facility. from the wharf to the storage area did not fall However, on March 15, the state Coastline Since no risk analysis was done on the Petro-under federal jurisdiction beCause it carried 11- Commisssion filed an exception to the proposed lane facility, there Is no way to determine the quefled propane. If the propane were in its gas- PUC action. expressing "strong concerns" about likelihood of various events in addition to eous form, it would be covered by federal regu- the safety of the LPG terminal complex. earthquakes, such as the effects on the storage lations, he said. The Coastline Commission said the examin-tanks from a fire or "BLEVE" in a nearby tank The U.S. Coast Guard has Jurisdiction over er's decision appeared to have been due "pri· truck or railroad tank car. the facility from the time the LPG tankers en- marily to the unfamiliarity with the potential A seismic study was done for Petrolane in ter U.S. territorial waters to the point they are unloaded. A Coast Guard spokesman said the agency does not now consider that it has juris- diction over the inland storage facility. The Coast Guard is circulating a draft of a permit procedure for marine terminals handling hazardOus materials. This procedure would re- gulate all aspects of new LPG tidewater facili· ties, including inland storage areas. It also would apply retroactively to facilities such as Petrolane's if "reasonable improvements" were required "at the discretion of the commandant." Under the proposed permit procedure, the Coast Guard would inspect the design, con- struction and operation of terminal facilities and require that operators and supervisory person· nel be reqUired to hold licenses. A terminal applicant woUld have to supply a chart of all areas within 5.000 feet showing various structures such as schools, hospitals, buildings with more than 100 persons, recrea • tton areas and other faclllties handling flamma- ble, l!ltplosive or toxic materials. "No specific guidelines are implied in this listing of structures and zones of human activi- ty," the Coast Guard said, "but the applicant would have the burden of proof using profes· s!onal risk analysis techniques to show that the site and waterway route chosen presents no more risk than (the) popuiaUon is exposed to in that area from such natural risks as hurricanes, earthquakes, fatal heart attack and death by cancer." Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. C-94 Gas Facility Quake Safety Questioned in PUC Report LARRY PRYOR Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File); Jul 16, 1977; ProQuest Historical Newspapers Los Angeles Times (1881 -1987) P.g.Al Gas Facility Quake Safety Questioned in PUC Report BY LARRY PRYOR Times Staff Writer A Uc1uefied petroleum gas (LPG) storage facility in San Pedro was not designed to ·withstand the maximum credible earthquake from two nearby fault zones. the staff .or the Public Utilities Commission said in a draft safctv rcoort. Th·c ra-cility, which ~an hold up to 2542 million gallons· of the hazardous rucl, was built on lhc assumption that lhc maximum. earthquake on the Nc\vport .. Jnglewood Fault would be 5.!i magnitude and lhc Palos Verdes Fault would be 6.0 magnitude. Recent studies, the report said, in .. dicatc a maximum earthquake for the Nc\vport· Inglewood of .7.0, and for the Palos Verdes, 7.0 to· 7*2 on the Hichtcr scale. Botti arc considered by geologists to be active faults. 'l1hc conclusion thal could be d11a\vn, th~ PUC draft report said, \s: 0 Withjn Lhcir lifetime, the LPG tanks may experience an earthquake of ~uch mngnitudc as to severely damage. both tanks, spilling· their con .. tents. ·· • uThc actual effects of such .f'an oc- currence • . . depends on a nu~pcr of factors, bul mostly upon the amount of LPG actually in the tanks al the time of rupture and whether the es- caping liquid vaporizes and is ignited. ''Certainly U the tanks were empty J little impact would result other thad the loss of lhc tanks, but if both were run or nearly full and both ruptured, the impact could be disastrous, espe- cially since the catch basin can only hold the contents of one tank." The PUC staff recommended that the reservoir at the base of the LPG tanks be· expanded lo hold Lhe volume .or both tanks. Ir the hnpoundment were deepened, the report said, the chance of spillage of LPG onto nearby Gaffey St. "would be m1n\m1zcd \n the event lhe dike cracked." 'rho rcpo.rL said that if the LPG Please Turn to Page 22, Col. 1 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. C-95 Gas Facility Safety Questioned Continued from First Page · tanks rupture while full, the propanc- based liquid would Clow Into an ad- jacent drainage channel and exceed its capacity. · "The liquid would Clow southward along .Gaffey Sl. .and would accumu-· late in a large pool around the inter- section of Gaffey and Battery Sts.," the report said, "From there it ·would. enter the storm sewers w.hich flow into the harbor about 800 feet away," Unlike liquefied natural gas tLNG), which is liquefied methane that is kept at minus 260 degrees, LPG Is stored a~ minus 45 degrees, or even higher temperatures tr it is un- der pressure. When it turns into a gas. ho\vever; LPG hugs the ground and is more volatile than LNG vapors which rise. The PUC report declined to specu- late on the possibility of ignition or explosion of an LPG spill at San Pe- dro, noting that results from exper- iments by federal agencies are not available. · A spokesman for the U.S. Coast Guard said further experiments with large-scale LPG spills would be car- 1·ied out at China Lake In about four weeks, but he said a great deal of re- search on LPG spills already had been done. "It's a matter of confirmation of the behavior (of propane vapor clouds) rather lhan going into a new area," he said. Numerous reports by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) document open-air detonations of LPG in transportation accidents, sev· eral with devastating results. An explosion or unconfined vapor Crom a railroad tank car at Decatur, Ill., in 1974, for example, set off a ~~film~lrn · "'hill a :==· a Some accidents have· resulted in devastating LPG explosions. ~~·~~-mBll'IOMi~ shock wave that was felt 40 miles away, damaged 700 homes and 11 schools. Losses totaled Sl8 million. Seven railroad cmployes were killed. Another explosion in Franklin County, Mo., in 1970, caused by a rup- tured LPG pipeline, "extensively damaged 13 homes within a 2-mile radius, sheared telephone poles, snapped tree trunks. smashed win- dows 12 miles away, and registered on a seismograph in St. Louis, 55 miles distant," ilic NTSB report said. The fatality rate would have been high, the NTSB said, except the rural area had been swiftly evacuated. The San Pedro LPG facility, oper· ated by Petrolane, Inc., of Long Beach, is on industrially zoned land but is within 1.000 feet or a residential street. The adjacent area also has schools, apartment houses and a drive-in theater. A spokesman for Pctrolanc sale Chicago Bridge and Iron, Inc., whid built the plant for Petrolane, Is re· viewing its specifications to see if th1 tanks can withstand greater shakinE than anticipated. "The preliminary numbers they ar< willing to stand by indicate the tanki will not fail even if a .7g force Is ex. erted on them," said Frank Maple vice president of the LPG Gas Divl· sion of Petrolane. The plant was designed to sustain t peak acceleration of .45g, or slight!) less than half the force or gravily. Maple 11aid these studies would bE turned over to the PUC. "If somebod) said those tanks were not safe, w~ wouldn't want to operale them," hE concluded. The facility is coming under .in- creasing scrutiny because the Soulh· ern California Gas Co. has proposcc buying 5 to 6 million barrels per yca1 of propane from Petrolane, mixing It with air in· a facility in Wilmington and injecting the gas into Its distrlbu. tion system. This requires approval of the PUC. An examiner in the case Initially rec- ommended that an environmental im- pact report, which would Include a safety analysis, was not necessary. This ruling is being contested by a number or agencies, including the state Coastal Linc Commission and the city or Los Angeles. The city attorney's office has filed a petition with the PUC pointing out that compressors at the Petrolane fa- cility arc creating noise and vibralion problems in the adjacent residential area in violation of the city noise or- dinance. Petrolanc's Maple said the company had installed a muffler on one of three compressors and was evaluat- ing the results. Critics or the facility argue that noise, seismic and other problems- such as the adequacy of tlic design of a 6,000-fool pipeline Crom the harbor to the storage facility-should be evaluated. The LPG demand created by the gas company project would require 21 to 23 shiploads of LPG into the inner Los Angeles Harbor per year, but the Coastline Commission staff has argued that a risk analysis and risk management plan for Petrolane's operations should be done "before an- other LPG lanker is permitted to berth at the LPG terminal." "The existing unloading and trans- fer facility appears to be poorly sited and equipped for receiving LPG tank- ers," the Coastline Commission staff said In comments In the PUC study. IL said the terminal is adjacent to pet· rochemical transport and storage fa· cilitles and to a large lumber yard. "An LPG accident with major con- sequences could result not only from direct LPG operations, but also from accidents occurring at these nearby facilities," the CoasUlne Commission staff said. . · A recent report by the city's Haz· ardous Cargo Task Force commended the safety procedures at the facility as being "very adequate," but recom- mended that the offloading berth "be considered for relocation to the outer harbor:" The task force said the city's Build- ing and Safety Department had "evaluated the seismic design of the storage facility and found design and construction to be adequate and is in the process of issuing permits ap- proving the installation." . . Although the storage tanks were put in operation In 1974, they were built without a building permit. Pet- rolane officials said they applied for permits but were told by lhe city the tanks were exempt. The Building Department revised that ruling after a story appeared In the April 4 edition of Tile Times UllEi!iHIR'lllintiil !Ill J!i l!illlilillllllllll1181 City evaluations of facility found seismic design adequately safe. llllllilfl ! 1111111111 JJllBllllllllllll I lllll 111 lllPllll pointing out that the tanks had been built without a building permit. John Robb, a seismic safety spe- cialist with the department, said the original consultants in the project, Converse Davis Dixon Assn.. had been asked to reevaluate the Petro- .lane project on the basis of more com· plete seismic data. · Considerable study has been devot- ed to the Palos Verdes and Newport- Inglewood faults recently because of a proposal to put an LNG facility on Terminal Island, which is in the same area. • The PUC stair also said the seismic safety design of the storage tanks "should be reviewed In light of recent studies Indicating the potential activi· ty of the Palos Verdes Fault." This leaves open the possibility that the $9 million facility will be found to be obsolete only three years after it started operations. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. C-96 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hello again Harris- Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Tuesday, April 30, 2013 12:20 PM hatran@dir.ca.gov MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det31 O@juno.com; connie@rutter.us; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov; michael.logrande@lacity.org; michael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; aaron. wilensky@mail.house.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; Kit Fox; chateau4us@att.net; elise.swanson@mail.house.gov; jacob.haik@lacity.org; hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov; niki.tennant@asm.ca.gov; norman.fassler-katz@sen.ca.gov; jcynthiaperry@aol.com; wgreuel@gmail.com; eric.garcetti@lacity.org Rancho LPG and OSHA Rancho_LPG_-_EPA_Show_Cause_Letter.pdf; West,_TX_laws_(1).PDF Recent news coverage of the West, TX fertilizer facility disaster has indicated that OSHA is one of the two primary responsible agencies for oversight of these types of storage facilities. We have always assumed that your responsibilities were more ancillary, and not as primary as we are now learning. In going back to our inspection of records on Rancho from your agency about a year ago now ..... we remember that your most recent inspection showed no significant violations. I am wondering if you know that the EPA issued a complaint against Rancho a few months ago on 6 items. I am enclosing the complaint for your review. As we are getting more and more educated on the issue of these butane and propane gasses .... we recognize now that the issue of the "containment pond" or "catch basin" truly serves no real purpose in the containment of a significantly ruptured butane tank as a safety measure. Since butane gas expands over 200 times, once the liquid is released into ambient air vaporizing it, the containment basin will retain less than 1 % of the contents of a single tank. So, that the concept of this basin as any type of safeguard is a simple "illusion". Obviously, this "safety measure" was imposed without any clear understanding of the chemical properties of LPG and never questioned throughout the entire 40+ years of the facility's existence. The failure of all jurisdictional agencies regarding the safety of chemical facilities has come to be largely recognized as of late. The loss of human lives due to this ambivalence to risk exposure is unacceptable. There are significant parallels in the Texas explosion to the Rancho LPG facility. I have attached an article for you to review. As witnessed, any scrutiny by government of an operation's submission of details on worst case scenario ... or their own existing conditions ... as "facts" is absent. That fact is allowing for incredibly high risk exposure from untrue submitted conditions to an unsuspecting population. This is absolutely the case with Rancho. We understand that Homeland Security has been evaluating the chemical facilities now to verify conditions. However, they have started with what has already been evaluated as "Tier I" category facilities ... which has taken them now over 2 years with the review far behind schedule. Facilities such as West, TX and Rancho LPG have been erroneously labeled as "Tier II"!! So that the "review" process of evaluation of these classified "tier II" category facilities is not even expected for another few years!! Meanwhile, under the present circumstances, this is highly reckless, further endangering a community that is, due to rising probabilities of terrorism, human error, failing infrastructure and earthquake, on the precipice of disaster. Professor Bob Bea from UC Berkeley, who is the government's own expert hired to find the "why" of catastrophic failures such as Katrina, the Gulf and San Bruno, has reviewed the circumstances of Rancho LPG and established the extreme potential for a disaster stemming from that facility of extraordinary proportions/I It is time for CAL-OSHA along with other authorized agencies and government representatives to step in ... and step up on this issue. Please refer this email to your supervisors and move toward action to prevent the catastrophe that we all recognize is looming. Our citizens deserve protection before it is too late! Thank you, Janet Gunter Member San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United Inc. (310) 251-7075 Professor Bea article link (see last paragraph identifying San Pedro) http://www.mensjournal.com/magazine/bob-bea-the-master-of-disaster-20130225?paqe=4 1 C-97 \, -(-r I . ' I / :C' )' I I ~ » ' . . , . . . . . . . QllP SOMODF.VIUA/CE'ITY IMAGES ris littered a field near the West FertiUzer Company plan~ in West, Tex., where a blast last week killed 14 people. Investigators believe it m_ay have been set off by ammonium nitrate stored there. ·'. ' . . . ·. . exczs fertilizer Plq:11t F~il Th~9qglz/;racks of 13,~gulatory Oversight ' ' . ·, . .... . • • . j. :.. •.• .. • ... - . • ·_!! ~:· r'-::. ;,;;·. . . • . : • !; .... ·.: • . -~;... -. • . . . . · ·. ·· · -·--·-·~~----··--· -· · · · ·· · '..-.:. ~N}WANNYFE~~NDEZ ; cal offkials.who often did not have tile :: an~ ~EN GIU?ENHOUSE Federal agencies were not expez:tise to asses.stile dangers. And the WEST, Tex. -In the 'moments after a • , · gaps m th_e oversight of the plant and a fire broke OUl al a fertjllzcr plant here nofined that Q plant WQS ~p~ ~aJI: 0! records have left the CS- last week some of therNolunteer fire-• . ·· 1 ·1 h . l .sential qu.estmn of how and why the am- fighters a:id other firs(~ponders who''· storing a Vo~at11e c emica • · .IJl~niun:i nitrate W?ite.i;l a·mystery. rushed to the scene ap~ to have .. . The .whole t!)ing m;iy have fallen known ,that the.re were·tt)~~·~J!.4an&er-ton, illustrates the patchwork regula~ , t~ugh a number of :egulatory cracks;· ously combust1bl~.-amm<,?~W,\;1"1ltrate ·tory world the plant operated in and the Said a fe<!eral official whose agency inside, but others did not. ..; ;,;.t;:' · ..... . . . . . ' . . .· . .: . ·hel~d regulil~.e the_plant. A . 'trat . th"'';., ... ~.h. '·-. ways m.whi~ it sltpped th.rough bu .... , <.,·Theexp·IOsio1hvas·sopow rf 1 ·t1 -mmomum m e is e s.~e c em reaucratic cracks at the federal state e u 1 ev ical that Timothy'.McVeigli ·used in the d local 1 vel · ' eled homes and left a crater 93 feet wide ~ Oklahoma Ci_ty bombing iif.1995. The ni-an e , s. _ . . . . and 10, feet deep~;ftidging by the size o,f ,;.; trogen-ricti ~~ical,·a cI"Y.~tal-lik!.: sub-. One ~-=~et tile. blast,; mvesugfii . t.he ~rat~ and .th.e extent of the d~ma?e < . stan~e ~.~j)lbles co~~elll"tab~e , .tors .w~ ~ilf not sure '1\pw. much ~ 'p1e~s of twisted met~_ landi;d 1~ d1s-:~ -~alt, 1s ?<?P,.~~~~rmers,~ .. a.fertll-,,.: momu~~ mtrate was stor~ there).~: ~t pastures,,~d ~Jl~ng tiles ~d . izer..but i . .n·lh~_.WJ'ol}l_ l h.anda m.the\ wh~~er1tha~beensroredpro~erly·lind .lightssl:1oo~.lo. ose:pb.,mldi. ngstwom!les wrong i:qndltfOnBlt .~ tupif. ,los~ve: ~ i. wh~ch agencies had ~n mformed away.-thl%eJW~on W<=IS more power- '.·<. lnvestl~ators sa)'.. pt~t flte, ~dnium ' 'l\.~~~·i~~J!~,th~~ abpst offede~a~, . · ful than ~e Ok!~oma City bombing, .. ~nl~te~t<>red at~lant,.ill,)'P~. to. state and local;off1c1als wer~ r:spo~s1-expertssru.d. . . . . ~·.have caused the}!.tlf3equent explos1Qn ble for regulating and momtormg the The blast occurred ~O:ortly before 8 \~~at. kllied 11)1 fir~htef$: a¥ at Ielist 4 plan,t's operations a~d. product~:: . ~.m. on April 17; abowt20 minutes after a " .·· .~ .. . . . ,. . . . -.... :.i'.'(civibans. . . ,/ \ t ' -Man:,:. safety dec1s1ons -. mcludmg fire '!'_as rep~rted at t_he plant, the West lif/\i>( ;. > :c..-:; · ·. ·· 1~,. ·• K1~.~c£FoR'TllEN1'wYo~:nMES · • Jhe unce~ty over 'Y:hg.'.'was aware moves.~ .. ,recent ~ears to build homes, Fertilizer Com~any, m this rural town ~\;ei:e held Sunday outside a ch.urch damaged in the blast. Ql!es-of the chemical at the P,lapt and who sch09~andanursmghomenotfarfrom north of Waco, m McLennan County. It , being raised aboti't the proximity of buildi~;s to the plant. was not, bo~.;at the site jJ{n Washing-. the;i~<!etld plant -were left t~Jo-Continued on Page A19 ·~-----· ·-·----·---··-' -..-. .. "'""'.-...,..~---·-· I ,I s '11 C - 9 8 1 exas.;~¢rtilrzer:,f.;Jantrett l nroµ~J1.!J.'!HJ:l'acoryr,,·1l:u£.!$~ · . ... . .. . . . ·=,··~.:. ~ .... ~~;. . .. ···:· . ·,..t~·;·.-· . . . ........ :;._ .· '">:;;··::,-· ... <.~:·.·. I ------.· :tJnder the Emer~e(lC~' Pian" ' ·· P!ants tha~ 'iJse.:or stor\'. explo-gorie$ basecl ofr~Q.'QrjnsI?ections, From Page AI2 mng and Commumfy RighHo-, s1ves or high.ttsk chemicals to a .iack :of worket. compll\llltS and appeared to have been set off by Know Act, the plant is required to . file reports ·with the Homeland because it was not :classified as the accidental eruption of am-send an annual report detailing_ · Security Department so it can in-high risk by the E.P.A monium nitrate, an official famil-the hazardous chemicals it keeps crease security at such facilities. Inspectors.with the Texas Feed iar with the investigation said. on site to three state and local Tjat ri;quirement inc)udes any ~n~ Fertilizer Co_ntrol Service, The plant-did not make ammoni-groups -the Texas Department plant with more than 400 pounds however, had m_ade at least 35 um nitrate, but was a retail dis-of State Health Services, tlie local of amµlcinium nitrate, l;>ut a ·Xisits to. the .. plant since 2006, in- tribution center; the chemical fire department and a group of. ·Homeland Secµrity. official ~aid cludinl;l one onApril 5, 12 days be- was brought in by train and county emergency officials that West Fertilizer had not filed fore the blast. That. agency reg- stored and sold out of large bins. known as the Local Emergency such a ~epr;>~t,,even though it had ulate.s aspepts Qf ,41,e,tertilizer in- When properly stored, ammo-Planning committee.. · 1,350 _tin:_ie!! · ~at· amount.. T~e ?u~try ~s .Pai:t. of·the,l?t~te chem- nium nitrate is difficult to ignite. Plant managers sent the re-. ~l~t 1s not on ~e. dep~e~t s 1st s office! .and. ~11er~~es the sale Investigators are exploring a port, called a Tier II report, to the ii.st of 4,0~0 fac1lmes with h.t~h-of ammonium n.1trat~ m the state. number of theories, t1:1e .o.fficial state agency this year and said nsk .che!111cals, and one off1C1al T~e state chem1St, .T~m H.errman, said, about what could have ere-that in 2012 the facility had s'tiid l~ Il'!l~ht hav~ been placed on s'.'-1d tJ:e la?' proh1~1ts hlm from ated the intense heat or other un-540 ,000 pounds of ammonium ni-that llst If 1t had filed .a report. d1sclos!~~ m:ormat1on abou~ the usual conditions necessary to trate stored, for sale to local A tan~le of agenc~es regulat~s 115 facilit1e~ •hat. hold permits to detonate the chemical: whether a farmers. That amount. is more plaqts,.like th~ one m West D1f-sell ammonium nitrate m Texas. fire that broke oiit earlier in tile-, than 100 times that·used in the. p~ren~;· agenc1e~<'\'fere ass1~ned Pa~l, Orum; a. co~sultant _on , day flared up again and grew· in Oklahoma City boitJbing. The re-·uvers1ght for different ·chemicals ··chemical. s~ety, said a rnaior · intensity; the possibility that po t was also sent t the Local t~ere. Amon.g the federal agen-sho~tcommg ~n the syst~m of reg- piles of seed nearby could have r 0 c1es responsible were the E.J>.A., ulating chemical ·plants 1s the reh- burst into flame; and whether the Homeland Security, the Occupa-ance on self-reporting. If a com- collapse of the roof of a wooden ~ma! Safety and Health Admin-pany like West Fertilizer fails to building damaged in the fire con-A reliance on istration and the Pipeline and file a required report or misre· tributed to the conditions. Hazardous Materials Safety Ad-ports the risks it faces, it is often "These are just working theo-self.reporting is ministration. State agencies in-hard for agencies, with their ries," said the official, who spoke elude the Texas Commission on budgetary constraints and over- on the condition of anonymity be-faulted. Environmental Quality, the state stretched staffs, to catch such er- cause the person is not author-cl:)emist's office and .the state rors. In its 2011 Risk Manage- ized to discuss the investigation. health services department. ment Plan fiied with the E.P.A., "None of these have enough sub-Under the Clean Air Act, the West Fertilizer did not check the stance for us to put forward as a Emergency Planning Committee, E.P.A. requires companies like box saying the plant might face a scenario." · a county official said. It was un-'West Fertilizer to file risk man-risk of fire or explosion. Experts had speculated that clear if the plant sent the report agement plans when they use or In addition, safety experts say another chemical at the plant -to· the West Volunteer Fire De-store ~izable quantities of anhy-these inspections and penalties anhydrous ammonia, a potential-partment, but itappeared likely. drous :ammonia. In a 2011 filing, do not address a fundamental ly flammable gas used as a com-A foreman at the plant who the plant said . it had 54,000 problem -the proximity of mercial fertilizer -played a role was killed in the explosion, Cody pounds of that chemical. But the houses, schools and a nursing in setting off· the ammonium ni-Dragoo; 50, was also a volunteer E.P.A. does not require those home to the fertilizer plant. trate. But the official said the firefighter. Other firefighters who plans to include whether a facility "You don't build an apartment plant's two bullet-shaped anhy-died worked in the local govern-uses or stores ammonium nitrate. complex, an· old folks home or a drous ammonia tanks were dam-ment or were knowledgeable J.n 2002, the federal Chemical school that 'close to a •facility aged but had not exploded. The about farming and agricultural !afety Board recommended to that's storing 270 tons of am- blast crater is··ln ·the.part of the chemicals. Dr. George N, Smith, the E.P.A. that it broaden those monium nitrate -that doesn't plant where ·the· ·ammonium, ni-the medical director of the West risk management plans to in-make sense," said Al Armenda- trate··was:stored,·the•official said, ambulance service, said he was elude volatile hazardous chem· riz, the former E.P.A. director for though investigators do not yet not aware that the plant stored icals similar to ammonium ni-Texas, and who now works for know exactly how much of it was ammonium nitrate. He was not trate. That recommendation was the Sierra Club. "None of these there at the time or how the stor-alone, however -neither the fed-never acted upon. agencies have or believe they age bins were configured. eral Environmental Protection OSHA officials, meanwhile, ac-have the authority -from the Manny Fernandez reported from West, and Steven Greenhouse from New York. Agency nor the Homeland Secu-knowled~ed that they had last in-federal government or the state rity Department knew, either. "fpected the plant 28 years ago. government -to require some After the Sept..11 attacks, Con-Agency-, officials said the plant kind of common-sense thing like gress passed a law requiring did not fall into its priority cate-a buffer zone." \ .......... ·-···---·--·· -..... ... ·--·-·------··'---------------·"-···-··· .J .... ··' C-99 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Subject: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Monday, April 15, 2013 10:56 AM chateau4us@att.net; Kit Fox National article confirms Prof. Bea concerns about Rancho LPG ... last page near bottom http://www.mensjournal.com/magazine/bob-bea-the-master-of-disaster-20130225?page=4 1 C-100 Men's Journal Magazine -Men's Style, Travel, Fitness and Gear Page 1of5 The Magazine Bob Bea, the Master of Disaster By Alex Prud'homme Feb 2013 Bob Bea, the nation's foremost forensic engineer, is the guy to call when levees break or oil rigs explode -to sift through the wreckage, assign blame, and try to prevent the same mistakes again. (He's still working on that part.) Robert Bea's large, beige, seemingly bland office in the engineering building at the University of California at Berkeley is revealed, upon close inspection, to be a cabinet of wonders. Perched on top of neat filing cabinets and tucked into comers are mysterious artifacts from around the world: a massive drill bit, a chunk of rusted metal, a model of an oil platform, a cluster of giant barnacles, strands of Mardi Gras beads, a beer bottle, and other totems. Each of them has a story to tell. That drill bit? It came from an oil rig that sank off the coast of Australia, causing a $1 billion disaster. The rusted metal? It's a piece of an oil tanker that supposedly "could not rust." The clutch of barnacles? From the Arctic seabed, where the oil industry once claimed, "There is no life." Bea (pronounced "bee") keeps these mementos as teaching aids and to prompt discussion about the role of human fallibility in mishaps - a subject rarely discussed in engineering circles, yet one that he believes is just as important as mechanical failure or software glitches. "Never let a good disaster go to waste" is Bea's mantra. "I'm in the prevention business," he says. "And you can't prevent what you don't understand." Bea has compiled a database of more than 600 engineering failures -from perforated submarine hulls to crumpled airplanes, fallen bridges, exploded pipelines, and upended oil rigs. But he also studies why things go right and how high-reliability organizations -such as pediatric emergency teams and aircraft-carrier crews -work successfully under pressure. A bald, saber-thin 76-year-old, with an erect bearing, a silver mustache, and a direct manner, Bea is co-founder of the Center for Catastrophic Risk Management, a nonprofit group based at Berkeley, and a pioneer in the emerging field of forensic engineering. When catastrophe strikes, it is usually Bea who is called in to make sense of the twisted wreckage and smoldering remains. Over the past few decades, he has appeared, Gump-like, at nearly every high-profile calamity-from the sinking of the Exxon Valdez in 1989 to the 2003 Columbia space-shuttle explosion to the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon in 2010. Today, Bea's grim expertise is central to two of the biggest lawsuits in U.S. history: a class-action suit alleging that the federal government failed to protect New Orleans from Hurricane Katrina, which killed more than 1,800 people in 2005; and another suit charging that BP and its partners in the Deepwater Horizon were responsible for the explosion that sank the drill rig, killing 11 and causing http://www.mensjoumal.com/article/print-view/bob-bea-the-master-of-disaster-20130225 5/24/2013 C-101 Men's Journal Magazine -Men's Style, Travel, Fitness and Gear Page 2of5 the largest oil spill in U.S. history. In November, BP, at least in part because of Bea's pointed testimony, settled, admitting to criminal liability for the spill and agreeing to pay a penalty of $4.5 billion. Bea's ability to explain complex data in layman's terms and his willingness to point out mistakes have made him a hero to disaster victims and a scourge to the targets of his criticism. He is unapologetic for his unvarnished opinions: "lfwe don't learn from our mistakes, then we are doomed to make them again and again," he says. "Unfortunately, that's what we've been doing." The week after superstorm Sandy devastated New York, New Jersey, and the nation's most populous coastline, Bea has a ready example of lessons that have gone unlearned. "It's a sad tale of complacency," he says, "by all measures a true 'predictable surprise."' He wonders what was done to prepare infrastructure or why hospitals weren't prepared with generator systems, particularly after what happened at New Orleans' Memorial Medical Center during Katrina, but he also sees our weakness as a product of good fortune. "I think a key part of our challenge is our generally bountiful blessings. Many of us have a lot of things that give us pleasure and comfort. Thinking about complex issues like global climate change and our out-of-date, decayed infrastructure systems is hard to do. It is much easier to 'hope' someone is taking care of us so that we can return to the enjoyments of our lives. Hope is no strategy for success."ln 1967, Eric Brown, who taught failure analysis at Imperial College London, described structural engineering as "the art of molding materials we do not really understand into shapes we cannot really analyze, so as to withstand forces we cannot really assess, in such a way that the public does not really suspect." His observation can be applied to many modern engineering marvels. It is one of the ironies of our time that while new technologies allow us to go ever-faster, deeper, and higher, they are increasingly laden with a "catastrophic complexity," which can overwhelm our ability to operate them safely. As the gap between man and his machines narrows -as computers become an extension of our nervous systems -the distinction between engineering and human problems has shrunk. The cause of most large-scale calamities, notes Bea, is "the human factor." Too often, designers fall in love with their ideas and lose sight of practical, quotidian concerns. "We engineers tend to believe in the myth of perfection," he says. "We understand the logic of systems and machines. What we don't understand is all of you illogical humans. We aren't trained to take into account things like hubris, greed, sloth, office politics, and the rest of it. It's not part of our skill set. But it needs to be. Dealing with the human factor is almost always more complicated than the technology." Indeed, Bea's database reveals that 20 percent of engineering disasters are the result of "intrinsic uncertainties" -i.e., natural events such as floods, tornadoes, and dust storms -while 80 percent are rooted in "extrinsic uncertainties" -i.e., human error. Consider the Challenger disaster in 1986, which was ostensibly a technical problem but was really caused by organizational dysfunction at NASA. The space shuttle blew up after launching, when an 0 -ring seal failed, killing its seven crew members. Investigating the crash, Bea found that NASA had known that 0-rings could be compromised by cold weather: The January launch day was cool, yet NASA controllers did not wait for the temperature to rise - a decision driven by inflexible managers and their schedules. The result was "an avoidable tragedy," says Bea. Similarly, when the space shuttle Columbia was destroyed during atmospheric reentry in 2003, killing all seven crew members, the given cause was broken foam insulation, but the root cause was NASA's broken culture. "We look back and say these accidents could have been prevented," Bea sighs. "NASA delivered incredibly high levels of individual performance, but they struggled to manage groups of people." http://www.mensjournal.com/article/print-view/bob-bea-the-master-of-disaster-20130225 5/24/2013 C-102 Men's Journal Magazine -Men's Style, Travel, Fitness and Gear Page 3of5 Looming behind such behavioral concerns is an intractable engineering problem: Much of America's critical infrastructure is aging and on the verge of failure. (A case in point: the 2007 collapse of an outmoded and improperly maintained highway bridge in Minneapolis, which killed 13 people.) Once the envy of the world, our power grids, bridges, tunnels, highways, dams, airports, drinking water, and wastewater-treatment plants are in desperate need of investment and updating. In 2009, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gave U.S. infrastructure an average grade ofD, meaning it is nearing failure, and estimated that the cost to repair and modernize these building blocks of society will be at least $2 trillion. But the cost of allowing them to fail is even greater, both in the short term (leading to expensive and inconvenient stopgap measures) and long term (limiting America's efficiency and global competitiveness). The longer we avoid the problem, the greater the risk. Or, as Bea puts it: "We wait, we're fucked." It takes a person who thinks in a weird way to figure out how things fail," Bea admits cheerfully. His goal is to identify the many small mistakes that compound into large disasters, learn from them, try to predict them, and avoid repeating them. While the task of design, building, or maintenance engineers is self-explll;natory, the work of a forensic engineer is more of a dark art, akin to being a detective. "You examine the dirt, the steel, the concrete, the water, to find out what really happened," Bea says. "And, crucially, you talk to the people. It's the only way to find out who did what, when. It's chillingly fascinating." When Bea talks about risk, his eyes brighten. From the age of 14, when he worked construction jobs in Florida, he has been intimate with the subject. After training in the Army Corps of Engineers, where he built levees to drain the Okefenokee Swamp, Bea joined Shell Oil as a roughneck on an offshore rig. Months into the job, one of Bea's colleagues lost part of his face and another lost three fingers in accidents. When Bea was ordered to replace the man who had lost his fingers, he says, "They just sent me up the derrick, 100 feet in the air, and told me to keep my head out of my ass -or I'd probably lose it. Terror is a fine instructor." Bea undertook his first forensic investigation in 1961, when Shell tasked him to investigate the sinking of Texas Tower 4 (TT4), a U.S. Navy radar platform that disappeared off New York with 28 crew members. Shell was moving its rigs deeper offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and wanted to know what had gone wrong. The answer: "TT4 was a terrible design," Bea recalls. "It had a big X-brace that caught both the wind and the waves. It was an accident waiting to happen." Bea's report was so thorough, he was asked to testify before Congress. By the time Hurricane Betsy struck New Orleans in 1965, Bea had been promoted to manager of Shell's Offshore Technology Development Group, where he was in charge of the company's Gulf oil platforms. His rigs survived Betsy's 140 mph winds and tanker-size waves. But the levees ringing the city failed, and the nation suffered its first 11 billion-dollar hurricane." Bea's house in New Orleans, where he was then living, flooded, and he and his family "evacuated vertically" into his office building, before fleeing to Houston. It was a defining experience, one that seems to have instilled a righteous anger in him to "make damn sure this never happens again." Bea stayed with Shell for 16 years, working from the Great Barrier Reefto Arctic ice floes and in executive suites from London to the Hague to Manhattan. In his spare time, he earned a master's degree in engineering from the University of Florida and an MBA from Harvard. Chafing in the corporate "velvet coffin," he quit Shell in 1976, founded and sold two engineering firms, and went to Tulane to learn how to construct buildings that could withstand a nuclear blast. In 1989, he applied to the engineering Ph.D. program at Berkeley on a whim. While Bea didn't have the required course work, the school was so impressed by his resume that it hired him as a professor. http://www.mensjournal.com/article/print-view/bob-bea-the-master-of-disaster-20130225 5/24/2013 C-103 Men's Journal Magazine -Men's Style, Travel, Fitness and Gear Page 4of5 At Berkeley, Bea met Karlene Roberts, a research psychologist studying human factors and high- reliability organizations, essentially working on the same problems from different angles. By necessity, their work is interdisciplinary, combining engineering, business management, and social science. Ultimately, their goal is not only to improve the way airliners, oil refineries, nuclear plants, and other engineered structures are built and operated, but also to create a design process that takes human fallibility into account and allows us to safely operate complex systems over the long term. But they have encountered resistance from academics and engineers who prefer to maintain specialized "silos" rather than encourage cross-pollination among disciplines. "Learning to be multidisciplinary takes a long time and a lot of money," Roberts explains. "People from different specialties don't speak the same language at first. They have to be trained, and that's difficult." In trying to nudge his conservative profession forward, Bea has helped to develop new risk- management strategies, particularly an interactive system that stresses the assessment and management of risk in real time. In studying the way pediatric emergency teams coordinate to keep babies alive, for example, they found that successful teams are fluid, shifting from highly structured to loosely structured groups during a crisis. Free-flowing communication is paramount. Hierarchies melt away, team µiembers continually update their diagnoses, and everyone supports the people with the best skills for the task at hand. "They search for what answer is right, not who is right," Bea says admiringly. Retirement looms on the horizon, vaguely, but first Bea has a few things to wrap up. Much on his mind is the potential flooding of his backyard. The weakest point of American flood defense now is not New Orleans or Miami, but the Sacramento -San Joaquin River Delta, just up the road from Berkeley. The delta is a vast estuary, through which fresh water for more than 25 million Californians flows. The delta is ringed by 1,100 miles of levees, but some are nearly 150 years old and leaking. The region is vulnerable to Pacific storms or, worse, an earthquake. Seismologists have predicted a 40 percent chance of a "catastrophic" quake there in the next 30 years. If the delta levees fail, the result could be a megaflood that would cripple the state, now the ninth-largest economy in the world. Yet Californians have been bitterly divided over a response for decades. Every solution is expensive and politically fraught. Bea is working on a task force, and calls the delta a "ticking bomb," warning that a breach there would prove worse even than Hurricane Katrina. "The Deepwater Horizon was trying to tell us something was wrong in the Gulf," he says. "Now the levees are trying to tell us something is wrong in the delta. If those levees go, we're all going to be drinking saltwater coffee," he jokes tragically. "My sailboat is rigged and ready to go!" Bob Bea is genial, unfailingly polite, and has an uncanny ability to synthesize complex information. He is widely admired in engineering circles. But he admits to being "ornery," and seems haunted by the memory of Hurricane Betsy. He is in perpetual motion-teaching, writing technical papers, attending conferences, consulting hither and yon. He has missed Christmas with his wife and two sons. He eats and sleeps little. It's as if he's racing to plug all the holes in a giant, leaky dike before it bursts. When I asked why he pushes himself so hard at an age when most people are focused on their golf game, he replies, "Make a living. Have some fun. Leave the world a better place." He shrugs, searching for answers. "I'm an engineer, but much like the corps, I don't always communicate well. Sometimes I don't have the words to explain myself. All I can say is 'I'm Bob. I'm here to help."' Bea has a lucrative international consulting career. But the work is exhausting, and he's growing tired. In the Katrina case, he is facing a vengeful Corps of Engineers, some of New Orleans' toughest http://www.mensjoumal.com/article/print-view/bob-bea-the-master-of-disaster-20130225 5/24/2013 C-104 Men's Journal Magazine -Men's Style, Travel, Fitness and Gear Page 5of5 lawyers, the Department of Justice, and 30 experts determined to poke holes in his work. It keeps him up. But he recently popped awake at 3 am with an insight: "I suddenly realized they can say what they want, but I've got the data. Bingo! That's where I find my solace." Bea's role in the lawsuit will soon end. He will then testify about his investigation of the 2010 San Bruno blast -in which a Pacific Gas & Electric gas pipeline exploded, killing eight and devastating a San Francisco suburb. "Then I'll be done," he smiles. Pausing a beat, he adds, "Well, there is one more thing." San Pedro, near the port of L.A., has bloomed into a major petrochemical complex. Residents, worried about a San Bruno -type explosion, have asked him to investigate. "Worn-out, tired old bastards are the only ones with the time and patience to look at this thing seriously," said Bea. What does he see there? "It's risky. Very risky," he says, a gleam in his eye. "I'm going to have a look." See also: Bob Bea's List of America's Most Vulnerable Places http://www.mensjournal.com/article/print-view/bob-bea-the-master-of-disaster-20130225 5/24/2013 C-105 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United <sphomeunited@gmail.com> Saturday, April 13, 2013 11 :22 AM lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov; elise.swanson@mail.house.gov; niki.tennant@asm.ca.gov; bill.orton@sen.ca.gov; rkim@lacbos.org; jacob.haik@lacity.org; Ricardo.Hong@lacity.org; Jim.Bickhart@lacity.org; william.carter@lacity.org; Nick Trutanich; mark.ghilarducci@calema.ca.gov; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov; Kit Fox COMMUNITY LETTER TO CHEMICAL SAFETY SAFETY BOARD ON RANCHO LPG spphu csb letter april 2013.doc Supplemental documents available upon request. 1 C-106 San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United, Inc. April 12, 2013 Mr. Don Holmstrom, Supervisor Chemical Safety Board Western Region PO Box 25465 Lakewood, CO 80205 Post Office Box 6455, San Pedro, CA 90734 Email: sphomeunited@gmail.com -Fax (310) 548-4255 RE: RANCHQ LPG LLC, San Pedro, CA Dear Mr. Holmstrom: Our homeowners have been heartened to read that the US Chemical Safety Board has recently deemed existing regulations on hazardous facilities in California to be "deficient" in the protection of public safety. We have been very aware of that obvious problem in our community of San Pedro, CA (located in the City of LA, Port of Los Angeles region) for many, many years. We are hopeful that because your agency understands better now the serious and unnecessary jeopardy being posed to the public that you will take a proactive stance in restoring a safer environment. We urge the intervention of the Chemical Safety Board in the operation listed above, Rancho LPG LLC, a subsidiary of Plains Midstream Canada and Plains All American Pipeline. We request that you conduct a comprehensive risk analysis on this facility as soon as possible due to the very vulnerable conditions of the facility and the extraordinarily massive volume (25+ Million Gallons) of butane and propane gas stored at the site. It is critical to remember that only 1,000 ft. away are neighborhoods, schools and businesses. It is also imperative to understand the this facility is located less than Y:z mile of the Port of Los Angeles with a blast radius that is estimated to be between 3 and 7 miles depending on circumstances. This radius involves not only the Port of Los Angeles but also the Port of Long Beach. The combined ports represent the largest in our nation and over $200 Billion in annual trade. The LPG facility was introduced in 1972/73, over 40 years ago, under the name "Petrolane" and was sold to Amerigas sometime in the 90's and sold again between 2005-2008 to its current owners. In this packet (in addition to many other documents) you will find the LA Times news articles written in 1977 by Larry Pryor (Pulitizer Prize winner and now Journalism Professor as USC) that reveals the less than honorable process of permitting that took place to develop this facility. The permit approval was largely handled by the Port of LA, whose Commissioner Cho was a shareholder in the company at the time. The facility entered into development without a risk analysis, and was exempted from proper public hearings, adherence to LA City fire regulations & API standards, and expedited through the permitting process. The litany of offenses to the concept of public safety are extensive. The facility site is located in a LA City Planning Dept. documented "Earthquake Rupture Zone". The active Palos Verdes Fault (mag. 7.3) is the primary fault with two or three smaller faults intersecting at that point causing even greater concerns geologically. USGS identifies that section ofland as "liquefaction" and "landslide areas. On top of this land sits two 12.5 Million Gallon butane tanks built in 1973 "without" LA City permits and built to a seismic substandard of 5.5-6.0 magnitude. C-107 The news articles published in 1977 also acted as the catalyst for Gov. Brown, in his first term, to initiate a study of the facility by the PUC. Unfortunately, the results of that study and the directives generated as a result of it, remained only to gather dust for over 30 years on a government shelf. The results of that study confirmed that the facility was deficient in safety of operation and given exemptions that it was not entitled to. (Study included) Our Homeowner members would like to know the following: 1. Has the CSB been aware of this LPG operation? Ifso, for how long and what has the CSB known about it? 2. Has the CSB ever conducted an investigation of the facility in its 40 years of existence? If so, what were the results or actions taken? 3. Does the CSB ever look at the issue ofliability insurance coverage? 4. The bulk of gas transport is handled by railcar. In March of 2012, there was a rail car collision just outside the gates of this facility (photo enclosed) on a rail spur under jurisdiction of the Port of LA. Had there been a rupture and subsequent fire and explosion, who would have assumed liability? How is the risk exposure of that rail line estimated and who is responsible? 5. How does the CSB evaluate a facility in which the "main safety feature", the impound basin, has been designed to contain only the liquid contents of a single tank, when in actuality, the basin will hold less than 1 % of the contents of that tank as the leaking liquid escapes, evaporating and expanding over 200 times its volume? The larger question since this remedy is totally inadequate scientifically for the containment of butane is, does the CSB ever evaluate the standards, like API 2510, in regard to the impound basin? 6. What can be done to address the problem that the setbacks required under API 2510 are not present? (They are deficient to the south, east and northeast.) 7. The EPA letter cites Rancho for confusion on the part of Rancho staff about their emergency response responsibilities; what can be done to clarify first, what can be done in the event of an emergency, and then to assign responsibilities to Rancho staff and to the Fire and police departments? 8. In light of the previous question, has CSB evaluated the California laws (and their inadequacies) concerning hazardous releases? The Certified Unified Permit Program (CUP A) was intended to bring all the laws and regulations together under the local CUP A (usually the local Fire Department), but Fire Dept's typically lack the budget, knowledge, or manpower to understand and enforce the large volume of laws. This is certainly true in metropolitan areas, like the LA Harbor communities, where there are many industrial sources. 9. Has Fed OSHA ever inspected the Rancho facility? If so, what was their finding? C-108 10. Since the Rancho facility lacks manpower (only 3 or 4 persons are on the 20 acre site at any one time) shouldn't there be some standard that requires, especially safety personnel or emergency responders to be on site at all times? 11. Has Rancho complied with the safety requirements associated with California's Injury and Illness Prevention Program? 12. The City of LA has acknowledged through its councilmembers and Port that this facility should have never been located in its current location and that it poses an elevated risk to residents. Yet, there has never been any disclosure to residents of the hazard in real estate transactions. There is currently a proposed housing development that is within Y:z mile of the Rancho facility with will create 800-1,000 new homes. Can the CSB establish a regulation of disclosure to buyers and lenders on sites that suffer this kind of risk exposure? In fighting this problem our homeowners have been very fortunate to have encountered some extraordinary people and professionals that have generously volunteered their valuable experience, advice and support. One of the most impressive of these is Professor Bob Bea from the University of California at Berkeley. Professor Bea is the well respected expert hired by our government to investigate the "why" of catastrophes including Katrina, San Bruno and the Gulf. Professor Bea has reviewed details of the Rancho LPG facility and has warned of the extraordinary potential of a cascading, "domino effect" disaster at Rancho. The adjoining Conoco Phillips refinery, the Naval Fuel Depot across the street from Rancho and the multitude of other oil and chemical facilities located at the nearby port offer the opportunity for a catastrophic inferno never before witnessed. Professor Bea gave advice to BP that could have circumvented the tragedy in the Gulf. His expert opinion in this matter deserves to be treated with the utmost respect and responded to. Disregarding his opinion will likely lead to devastation and death, like that of the BP disaster, but it appears, far worse. Included is a series of email exchanges between a representative of CAL-EMA, Mr. Vance Bennett and our Homeowner member, Janet Gunter. While Ms. Gunter, is clearly dissatisfied with the inaction of public officials and agencies in regard to this facility, the responses from Mr. Bennett exemplify the reasons why. Ms. Gunter forwarded the questions posed by Mr. Bennett to Professor Bea. The Professor then replied to those questions with his own answers that were referred back to CALEMA. The answers of Professor Bea should be adopted by your Board as the correct, prudent and responsible answers with following action applied to prevent the deadly potentials described by him. Just last month, the BP A made a legal demand on Rancho LPG for six violations. Please see letter enclosed. It is important to note the dates of inspections and issued violations (2010 & 2011) as they relate to the company's chronic delay in compliance. The extremely hazardous nature of this facility should prompt much more urgency in actions to correct any problems. This delay offers a clear view of the company's attitude. Also, of particular interest on this issue is a change in worst case scenario criteria for RMP's on chemical facilities that occurred in the 90's. This change allowed a new calculation to be used in estimating radius of impact. The action was a concession by the BP A to the APL Details of that event are included and chronicled by one of our industry experts, Connie Rutter. C-109 We sincerely hope that your Board will take everything submitted regarding this situation into serious consideration and ultimately agree that a complete review and risk analysis of the Rancho LPG facility is warranted. We are also enclosing a DVD produced by our homeowners that was created to educate others about the existing hazards of this operation. It is 13 minutes long and we hope that you will take the time to view it. Some people view it as "too scary''. We, on the other hand, feel that it may not be scary enough in revealing the real and true potential of an incident at Rancho. In closing, we applaud the work of the Chemical Safety Board and thank you for your efforts to promote good safety regulations and the protection of the innocent. We also hope that you can help us too, before it is too late. Sincerely, C~it~ Chuck Hart President PS. We have an enormous library ofrecords if you would like any further documentation on this facility. Cc:Congressman Henry Waxman Congresswoman Janice Hahn Congresswoman Maxine Waters Senator Rod Wright Assemblywoman Bonnie Lowenthal LA County Supervisor Don Knabe LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa LA City Atty Carmen Trutanich LA City Councilman Joe Buscaino Mark Ghilarducci, CALEMA Professor Robert Bea Rancho Palos Verdes City Council Mary Wesling, EPA C-110 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hello Again Mr. Tillema- Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:38 AM Dan.Tillema@csb.gov MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det31 O@juno.com; aaron.wilensky@mail.house.gov; lisa .pinto@mail.house.gov; michael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; Kit Fox; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov Re: A VIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LAX REGS IN CALIFORNIA I've been talking to our Homeowner members about the trip to Richmond. Not sure at this point who, if anyone, will be able to attend. What we wish to do in the meantime is submit a package of information to be distributed to your Board and CSB management on the LPG facility of concern. Hopefully, we will have that package out to you by tomorrow. Please let me know how you think the package should be addressed. Again, please know that we are grateful that your agency and Board are taking such a hard look at safety issues related to these highly hai;:ardous facilities. Certainly, it is time. Janet Gunter San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United -----Original Message----- From: Tillema, Dan <Dan.Tillema@csb.gov> To: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Cc: MrEnvirlaw <MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net>; det310 <det310@juno.com>; aaron.wilensky <aaron.wilensky@mail.house.gov>; lisa.pinto <lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov>; michael_davies <m ichael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov>; michael .picker <michael.picker@gov.ca.gov>; noelweiss <noelweiss@ca.rr.com>; kitf <kitf@rpv.com>; bea <bea@ce.berkeley.edu> Sent: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 7:26 am Subject: RE: A VIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LAX REGS IN CALIFORNIA Ms. Gunter, Thank you for your email yesterday. While I certainly appreciate the support of our regulatory analysis following the August 6, 2012 fire at the Chevron refinery in Richmond, I need to inform you that my investigation team is limited in our ability to expand the scope of our investigation to matters that are not causal to the incident we are investigating and certainly not without CSB management and Board member support. I have forwarded your email to the two levels of management above me within the CSB, so they are aware of the situation. They suggested I inform you of an upcoming opportunity to directly speak to the Board in California. All of the Board members are going to be in Richmond on the evening of April 191h. That is the date of our public meeting on the Chevron Richmond Interim Report and is where the investigation team will present our findings to the Board; a panel of stakeholders will discuss their efforts, concerns, and or suggestions to the Board for consideration; members of the public will each be allowed a 2-3 minute public comment period; and finally the Board will vote on whether or not to approve the report and the recommendations it contains. The public comment period would be your opportunity to support the findings related to the regulatory analysis we identified from the Chevron incident and introduce your concerns related to the LPG facility in your community. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. PDT at the Richmond Memorial Auditorium and Convention Center located at 403 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA. Additional details can be found here: http://www.csb.gov/csb-announces-public-meeting-in-richmond-california-to- release-interim-report-and-safety-recommendations-resulting-from-chevron-refinery-investigation/ 1 C-111 I have also copied below a relevant portion of CSB regulations which allows the Board to conduct safety studies. Safety studies have been done in the past, but are certainly not as common as accident investigations. Again, the Board members would need to fully support any proposed safety study. I mention safety studies because off the top of my head, that would seem to be the appropriate mechanism to address the concerns you are raising with respect to the LPG facility. 0 ---------... ---·--· --- I hope this is helpful and if I can provide additional information, please let me know. Let me know if you are able to make the Richmond meeting and we can meet earlier that day or afterwards for additional discussion on this topic. Regards, Dan Tillema P.E. Chemical Incident Investigator U.S. Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board dan.tillema@csb.gov 202-407-5176 The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author only and do not represent official policies of the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board unless they are expressly identified as such. Because e-mail can be altered electronically, the integrity of this communication cannot be guaranteed. Visit us on the World Wide Web at http://www.csb.gov From: Janet Gunter [mailto:arriane5@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:03 PM To: Tillema, Dan Cc: MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det31 O@juno.com; aaron.wilensky@mail.house.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; michael davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; kitf@rpv.com; 2 C-112 bea@ce.berkeley.edu Subject: A VIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LAX REGS IN CALIFORNIA Mr. Tillema- Your recent admission and testimony regarding the insufficient regulations regarding California's chemical and fuel facilities is greatly appreciated. My name is Janet Gunter, and we have been fighting for over 40 years the presence of a massive LPG facility storing over 26 Million gallons of butane and propane within 1,000 ft. of homeowners, schools and businesses. The facility was introduced over 40 years ago by the Port of LA (under the name, Petrolane) in order to realize the profitable opportunity of shipping this volatile commodity by sea.(that opportunity no longer exists with all transport being conducted by rail and truck) LA Harbor Commissioner Cho was a shareholder in the company at that time and the facility was introduced without a risk analysis, exempted from LA City Fire regulations, CEQA, and also expedited through the permitting process. The two largest 12.5 million gallon butane tanks were built without LA City building permits at the time (1973) and only "certified" by building and safety 5 years later while the facility was in operation. The facility sits in the middle of an active LA City Planning documented "Earthquake Rupture Zone". The fault is the Palos Verdes Fault and it has a 7 .3 magnitude capability. The tanks are "said" to be built to a seismic sub-standard of 5.5-6.0. The land that the tanks are located on is also identified by USGS as "landslide and liquefaction" areas. I am attaching the recent demand to Rancho LPG by the EPA on deficiencies identified by them two and three years ago but not complied with by Rancho. The list of issues related to jeopardy at this facility is extremely long. I don't want to encumber you with the litany of details at this point. Much of this information can be viewed on our website at: www.hazardsbegone.com We believe that the pure luck that has been protecting our area for so many years cannot last forever. The 40+ year old antiquated infrastructure, increasing probability of the big earthquake to our region, and the elevated terrorism risk contribute greatly to a likelihood of disaster here. UC Berkeley Professor Bob Bea (the expert in San Bruno, Katrina and Gulf disasters) has reviewed the situation with Rancho LPG and has warned of the extreme potential of a "domino effect" of catastrophe at this facility. Because of the facility's close proximity to a "multitude" of refineries, fuel and chemical storage facilities and oil terminals at the Port of LA (within 1/2 mi.) the potential for a devastating cascading event are to be emphasized. An event at this facility could result in the overwhelming decimation of the area and its population. We have been fighting with government officials and regulatory agencies for YEARS on this issue. We need assistance .... and we need it BEFORE the disaster. After reading the recent testimony of both you and Mr Holstrom we believe that finally .... finally .... the absence of logic it government as it relates to safety in these cases is beginning to resonate. Please help to bring sanity to this situation as soon as possible. Sincerely, Janet Gunter Member, San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United ph: 310 251-7075 3 C-113 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hello Mr. Tillema- Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:54 AM Dan.Tillema@csb.gov MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det31 O@juno.com; aaron.wilensky@mail.house.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; michael_davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; Kit Fox; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; niki. tennant@asm.ca.gov; hamilton .cloud@mail .house .gov; jacob.haik@lacity.org; elise.swanson@mail.house.gov; bill.orton@sen.ca.gov; norman.fassler-katz@sen.ca.gov Re: VIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S CLAIM OF LAX REGS ON ENERGY FACILITIES IN CALIFORNIA Thank you so much for your prompt response. As I read through what seems like a "real" opportunity to finally affect "change" or "action" on such a long awaited issue ... I was distraught to realize that I will be leaving the day before this meeting for a long awaited European vacation. Richmond is a significant distance from the LA Harbor area and it will not be a convenient opportunity for most folks. I will do my best to encourage attendance from other members of our Homeowners group. However, having said that....I am looking at the above government offices that have been cc'd on this email and believe that this is the "perfect" time for our government leaders to stand up for the protection of their constituents. The impact of a plea for a comprehensive risk analysis of this ultra hazardous facility by our Senate and Congressional representatives would be impactful and in the end more meaningful than a plea delivered by our Homeowners. Please don't misunderstand, I hope that our homeowners can attend. But, in instances like this, I am disheartened that our political leaders are not at the forefront and leading the way in promoting rational thought and assurances of public safety. This is particularly true now in light of the Chemical Safety Board's most recent acknowledgement of deficient regulatory safety standards of these facilities. My hope is that the government offices originally cc'd in this email and the others that I have now added will be stimulated to attend on behalf of the thousands of constituents whose lives may well be in jeopardy due to the presence of this Rancho LPG facility. The experiences of Richmond, San Bruno, and the Gulf have shined the spotlight on an industry's ability to privatize the profits while they socialize the risks. There has been far too great of a price to pay for that policy. It is time for change now ... before it is too late .... again! Sincerely, Janet Gunter -----Original Message----- From: Tillema, Dan <Dan.Tillema@csb.gov> To: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Cc: MrEnvirlaw <MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net>; det310 <det310@juno.com>; aaron.wilensky <aaron.wilensky@mail.house.gov>; lisa.pinto <lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov>; michael_davies <michael_davies@feinstein.senate.gov>; michael.picker <michael.picker@gov.ca.gov>; noelweiss <noelweiss@ca.rr.com>; kitf <kitf@rpv.com>; bea <bea@ce.berkeley.edu> Sent: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 7:26 am Subject: RE: A VIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LAX REGS IN CALIFORNIA Ms. Gunter, Thank you for your email yesterday. While I certainly appreciate the support of our regulatory analysis following the August 6, 2012 fire at the Chevron refinery in Richmond, I need to inform you that my investigation team is limited in our ability to expand the scope of our investigation to matters that are not causal to the incident we are investigating and certainly not without CSB management and Board member support. I have forwarded your email to the two levels of management above me within the CSB, so they are aware of the situation. They suggested I inform you of an upcoming opportunity to directly speak to the Board in California. All of the Board members are going to be in Richmond on the evening of April 191h. That is the date of our public meeting on the Chevron Richmond Interim Report and is where the investigation team will present our findings to the Board; a panel of stakeholders will discuss their efforts, concerns, and or suggestions to the Board for consideration; members of the public will each be allowed a 2-3 minute public comment period; and finally the Board will vote on whether or not to approve the report and the recommendations it contains. The public comment period would be your opportunity to support the findings 1 C-114 related to the regulatory analysis we identified from the Chevron incident and introduce your concerns related to the LPG facility in your community. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. PDT at the Richmond Memorial Auditorium and Convention Center located at 403 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA. Additional details can be found here: http://www.csb.gov/csb-announces-public-meeting-in-richmond-california-to- release-interim-report-and-safety-recommendations-resulting-from-chevron-refinerv-investigation/ I have also copied below a relevant portion of CSB regulations which allows the Board to conduct safety studies. Safety studies have been done in the past, but are certainly not as common as accident investigations. Again, the Board members would need to fully support any proposed safety study. I mention safety studies because off the top of my head, that would seem to be the appropriate mechanism to address the concerns you are raising with respect to the LPG facility. § 16'00.3 Functrou. (a) Tho CSB imrostiga:tfils chemical accidents and hazards, rooommtm.ding actions to protect workers, tho public, and th>t em•ironmont Tho CSB is responsible for the investigation and deto.rmina.tion of tho facts, conditions, md c:ircmnstanct]ts and the cause or probable ca.use or causes of my accidental release resulting in a fatality, .serious injury. or substantial property damagu, lb) 'I'htl CSB makes safety recommendations to r'edoral, State, and local a.g1mcios, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Admiuistralicm and private organizations to reduce the llikelihood of mcurTtm.ces of chemical incidents. It mitiat:ecs and conducts -!I Ii# and special investigations on matters pertaini cal safety. · (c) The issues rnporls pursuant to its duties to detmmino tho cause or probable cause or causes of cheinical incidents and to report the facts, conditions, and ci:reu:n1stances relating to such incidents; and issues and niales available to the public sa.fety recommendations, safety studies, and reports of special investigations. I hope this is helpful and if I can provide additional information, please let me know. Let me know if you are able to make the Richmond meeting and we can meet earlier that day or afterwards for additional discussion on this topic. Regards, Dan Tillema P.E. Chemical Incident Investigator U.S. Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board dan.tillema@csb.gov 202-407-5176 The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author only and do not represent official policies of the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board unless they are expressly identified as such. Because e-mail can be altered electronically, the integrity of this communication cannot be guaranteed. Visit us on the World Wide Web at http://www.csb.gov 2 C-115 From: Janet Gunter [mailto:arriane5@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:03 PM To: Tillema, Dan Cc: MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det31 O@juno.com; aaron.wilensky@mail.house.gov; lisa. pinto@mail.house.gov; michael davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; kitf@rpv.com; bea@ce.berkeley.edu Subject: AVIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LAX REGS IN CALIFORNIA Mr. Tillema- Your recent admission and testimony regarding the insufficient regulations regarding California's chemical and fuel facilities is greatly appreciated. My name is Janet Gunter, and we have been fighting for over 40 years the presence of a massive LPG facility storing over 26 Million gallons of butane and propane within 1,000 ft. of homeowners, schools and businesses. The facility was introduced over 40 years ago by the Port of LA (under the name, Petrolane) in order to realize the profitable opportunity of shipping this volatile commodity by sea.(that opportunity no longer exists with all transport being conducted by rail and truck) LA Harbor Commissioner Cho was a shareholder in the company at that time and the facility was introduced without a risk analysis, exempted from LA City Fire regulations, CEQA, and a/so expedited through the permitting process. The two largest 12.5 million gallon butane tanks were built without LA City building permits at the time (1973) and only "certified" by building and safety 5 years later while the facility was in operation. The facility sits in the middle of an active LA City Planning documented "Earthquake Rupture Zone". The fault is the Palos Verdes Fault and it has a 7 .3 magnitude capability. The tanks are "said" to be built to a seismic sub-standard of 5.5-6.0. The land that the tanks are located on is also identified by USGS as "landslide and liquefaction" areas. I am attaching the recent demand to Rancho LPG by the EPA on deficiencies identified by them two and three years ago but not complied with by Rancho. The list of issues related to jeopardy at this facility is extremely long. I don't want to encumber you with the litany of details at this point. Much of this information can be viewed on our website at: www.hazardsbegone.com We believe that the pure luck that has been protecting our area for so many years cannot last forever. The 40+ year old antiquated infrastructure, increasing probability of the big earthquake to our region, and the elevated terrorism risk contribute greatly to a likelihood of disaster here. UC Berkeley Professor Bob Bea (the expert in San Bruno, Katrina and Gulf disasters) has reviewed the situation with Rancho LPG and has warned of the extreme potential of a "domino effect" of catastrophe at this facility. Because of the facility's close proximity to a "multitude" of refineries, fuel and chemical storage facilities and oil terminals at the Port of LA (within 1/2 mi.) the potential for a devastating cascading event are to be emphasized. An event at this facility could result in the overwhelming decimation of the area and its population. We have been fighting with government officials and regulatory agencies for YEARS on this issue. We need assistance .... and we need it BEFORE the disaster. After reading the recent testimony of both you and Mr Holstrom we believe that finally .... finally .... the absence of logic it government as it relates to safety in these cases is beginning to resonate. Please help to bring sanity to this situation as soon as possible. Sincerely, Janet Gunter Member, San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United ph: 310 251-7075 3 C-116 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Marcie Miller <marciesmiller@sbcglobal.net> Tuesday, April 09, 2013 4:17 PM Janet Gunter dan.tillema@csb.gov; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det31 O@juno.com; aaron .wilensky@mail.house.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; m ichael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael .picker@gov.ca.gov; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; Kit Fox; bea@ce.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: A VIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LAX REGS IN CALIFORNIA Dear Janet, Thank you for reaching out to Mr. Tillema of the CSB and for articulating the ongoing and very serious concerns this community has about the Rancho LPG Tank Farm. All three of our San Pedro Neighborhood Councils have listened to the fears of our constituents and have passed numerous motions begging for government regulatory intervention and political will. As Public Safety Committee Chair of the Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council, I can tell you how personally frustrating it has been to see the flow of political campaign contributions from the Rancho LPG corporate family deaden the will of our local elected officials -our City Attorney, our mayors, our councilmen and women. This is all very sad and terrifying for me personally, too. I lived in Tokyo, Japan for 12 years and followed news reports about seismic and nuclear safety -oversight, public policy, protests, accidents, incidents, and warnings about the unthinkable. Life went on, and to get away from it all, I'd pack an overnight bag and take my young children to the beach at Fukushima in Daiichi Prefecture because reminded me of home in California. I hope, from the bottom of my heart, that Mr. Tillema can and will make an historic difference. Marcie Miller Sent from my iPhone On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> wrote: Mr. Tillema- Your recent admission and testimony regarding the insufficient regulations regarding California's chemical and fuel facilities is greatly appreciated. My name is Janet Gunter, and we have been fighting for over 40 years the presence of a massive LPG facility storing over 26 Million gallons of butane and propane within 1,000 ft. of homeowners, schools and businesses. The facility was introduced over 40 years ago by the Port of LA (under the name, Petrolane) in order to realize the profitable opportunity of shipping this volatile commodity by sea.{that opportunity no longer exists with all transport being conducted by rail and truck) LA Harbor Commissioner Cho was a shareholder in the company at that time and the facility was introduced without a risk analysis, exempted from LA City Fire regulations, CEQA, and also expedited through the permitting process. The two largest 12.5 million gallon butane tanks were built without LA City building permits at the time (1973) and only "certified" by building and safety 5 years later while the facility was in operation. The facility sits in the middle of an active LA City Planning documented "Earthquake Rupture Zone". The fault is the 1 C-117 Palos Verdes Fault and it has a 7.3 magnitude capability. The tanks are "said" to be built to a seismic sub-standard of 5.5-6.0. The land that the tanks are located on is also identified by USGS as "landslide and liquefaction" areas. I am attaching the recent demand to Rancho LPG by the EPA on deficiencies · identified by them two and three years ago but not complied with by Rancho. The list of issues related to jeopardy at this facility is extremely long. I don't want to encumber you with the litany of details at this point. Much of this information can be viewed on our website at: www.hazardsbegone.com We believe that the pure luck that has been protecting our area for so many years cannot last forever. The 40+ year old antiquated infrastructure, increasing probability of the big earthquake to our region, and the elevated terrorism risk contribute greatly to a likelihood of disaster here. UC Berkeley Professor Bob Bea (the expert in San Bruno, Katrina and Gulf disasters) has reviewed the situation with Rancho LPG and has warned of the extreme potential of a "domino effect" of catastrophe at this facility. Because of the facility's close proximity to a "multitude" of refineries, fuel and chemical storage facilities and oil terminals at the Port of LA (within 1/2 mi.) the potential for a devastating cascading event are to be emphasized. An event at this facility could result in the overwhelming decimation of the area and its population. We have been fighting with government officials and regulatory agencies for YEARS on this issue. We need assistance .... and we need it BEFORE the disaster. After reading the recent testimony of both you and Mr Holstrom we believe that finally ... .finally .... the absence of logic it government as it relates to safety in these cases is beginning to resonate. Please help to bring sanity to this situation as soon as possible. Sincerely,. Janet Gunter Member, San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United ph: 310 251-7075 <Rancho_ LPG_ -_EPA_ Show_ Cause_ Letter.pd£> 2 C-118 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ms. Gunter, Tillema, Dan <Dan.Tillema@csb.gov> Wednesday, April 10, 2013 7:22 AM Janet Gunter MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det31 O@juno.com; aaron .wilensky@mail.house.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; michael_davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; Kit Fox; bea@ce.berkeley.edu RE: A VIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LAX REGS IN CALIFORNIA Thank you for your email yesterday. While I certainly appreciate the support of our regulatory analysis following the August 6, 2012 fire at the Chevron refinery in Richmond, I need to inform you that my investigation team is limited in our ability to expand the scope of our investigation to matters that are not causal to the incident we are investigating and certainly not without CSB management and Board member support. I have forwarded your email to the two levels of management above me within the CSB, so they are aware of the situation. They suggested I inform you of an upcoming opportunity to directly speak to the Board in California. All of the Board members are going to be in Richmond on the evening of April 19th. That is the date of our public meeting on the Chevron Richmond Interim Report and is where the investigation team will present our findings to the Board; a panel of stakeholders will discuss their efforts, concerns, and or suggestions to the Board for consideration; members of the public will each be allowed a 2-3 minute public comment period; and finally the Board will vote on whether or not to approve the report and the recommendations it contains. The public comment period would be your opportunity to support the findings related to the regulatory analysis we identified from the Chevron incident and introduce your concerns related to the LPG facility in your community. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. PDT at the Richmond Memorial Auditorium and Convention Center located at 403 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA. Additional details can be found here: http://www.csb.gov/csb-announces-public-meeting-in-richmond-california- to-release-interim-report-and-safety-recommendations-resulting-from-chevron-refinery-investigation/ I have also copied below a relevant portion of CSB regulations which allows the Board to conduct safety studies. Safety studies have been done in the past, but are certainly not as common as accident investigations. Again, the Board members would need to fully support any proposed safety study. I mention safety studies because off the top of my head, that would seem to be the appropriate mechanism to address the concerns you are raising with respect to the LPG facility. 1 C-119 § 1600.3 Functions. (a) 'I"he CSB investigates chemical accidrmts and hazards. moommending actions to prot&et workers, the public, and thtl environment. The CSB is responsible for the investigation and detmnlination of the facts, conditions, and circumstances a.nd the cause o.r probable cause or ca1JSes of any aooid®ttil release resulting in a fatality, serious injury, or substantial property CSB makes safety reconunendatkms to Federal, State, and local agcncicts, including thn EnvironmcnlaJ Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and private organizations to mduce the likelihood of recurrences of chemical im:idmits. It initiates and conducts --and special investigati.ons on matters pertaining to chmnical safety, (c) Tho CSB issues mports pursuant lo its duties to detmmlne the ca.use or probable c.ause or causes of clmmk:al incidents and to mport the facts, oonditions, and circumstances mlating to such incidents; and issum and makes available to the public safety recommendations, safety studies, and reports of special investigations. I hope this is helpful and if I can provide additional information, please let me know. Let me know if you are able to make the Richmond meeting and we can meet earlier that day or afterwards for additional discussion on this topic. Regards, Dan Tillema P .E. Chemical Incident Investigator U.S. Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board dan.tillema@csb.gov 202-407-5176 The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author only and do not represent official policies of the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board unless they are expressly identified as such. Because e-mail can be altered electronically, the integrity of this communication cannot be guaranteed. Visit us on the World Wide Web at http://www.csb.gov From: Janet Gunter [mailto:arrianeS@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:03 PM To: Tillema, Dan Cc: MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det310@juno.com; aaron.wilensky@mail.house.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; michael davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; kitf@rpv.com; bea@ce.berkeley.edu Subject: A VIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LAX REGS IN CALIFORNIA 2 C-120 Mr. Tillema- Your recent admission and testimony regarding the insufficient regulations regarding California's chemical and fuel facilities is greatly appreciated. My name is Janet Gunter, and we have been fighting for over 40 years the presence of a massive LPG facility storing over 26 Million gallons of butane and propane within 1,000 ft. of homeowners, schools and businesses. The facility was introduced over 40 years ago by the Port of LA (under the name, Petrolane) in order to realize the profitable opportunity of shipping this volatile commodity by sea.(that opportunity no longer exists with all transport being conducted by rail and truck) LA Harbor Commissioner Cho was a shareholder in the company at that time and the facility was introduced without a risk analysis, exempted from LA City Fire regulations, CEQA, and a/so expedited through the permitting process. The two largest 12.5 million gallon butane tanks were built without LA City building permits at the time (1973) and only "certified" by building and safety 5 years later while the facility was in operation. The facility sits in the middle of an active LA City Planning documented "Earthquake Rupture Zone". The fault is the Palos Verdes Fault and it has a 7.3 magnitude capability. The tanks are "said" to be built to a seismic sub-standard of 5.5-6.0. The land that the tanks are located on is also identified by USGS as ''landslide and liquefaction" areas. I am attaching the recent demand to Rancho LPG by the EPA on deficiencies identified by them two and three years ago but not complied with by Rancho. The list of issues related to jeopardy at this facility is extremely long. I don't want to encumber you with the litany of details at this point. Much of this information can be viewed on our website at : www.hazardsbegone.com We believe that the pure luck that has been protecting our area for so many years cannot last forever. The 40+ year old antiquated infrastructure, increasing probability of the big earthquake to our region, and the elevated terrorism risk contribute greatly to a likelihood of disaster here. UC Berkeley Professor Bob Bea (the expert in San Bruno, Katrina and Gulf disasters) has reviewed the situation with Rancho LPG and has warned of the extreme potential of a "domino effect" of catastrophe at this facility. Because of the facility's close proximity to a "multitude" of refineries, fuel and chemical storage facilities and oil terminals at the Port of LA (within 1/2 mi.) the potential for a devastating cascading event are to be emphasized. An event at this facility could result in the overwhelming decimation of the area and its population. We have been fighting with government officials and regulatory agencies for YEARS on this issue. We need assistance .... and we need it BEFORE the disaster. After reading the recent testimony of both you and Mr Holstrom we believe that finally .... finally .... the absence of logic it government as it relates to safety in these cases is beginning to resonate. Please help to bring sanity to this situation as soon as possible. Sincerely, Janet Gunter Member, San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United ph: 310 251-7075 3 C-121 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mr. Tillema- Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Tuesday, April 09, 2013 11 :03 AM dan.tillema@csb.gov MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; det31 O@juno.com; aaron .wilensky@mail.house.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; michael_davies@feinstein.senate.gov; michael.picker@gov.ca.gov; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; Kit Fox; bea@ce.berkeley.edu A VIVID ILLUSTRATION OF THE CSB'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LAX REGS IN CALIFORNIA Rancho_LPG_-_EPA_Show_Cause_Letter.pdf Your recent admission and testimony regarding the insufficient regulations regarding California's chemical and fuel facilities is greatly appreciated. My name is Janet Gunter, and we have been fighting for over 40 years the presence of a massive LPG facllity storing over 26 Million gallons of butane and propane within 1,000 ft. of homeowners, schools and businesses. The facility was introduced over 40 years ago by the Port of LA (under the name, Petrolane) in order to realize the profitable opportunity of shipping this volatile commodity by sea.{that opportunity no longer exists with all transport being conducted by.rail and truck) LA Harbor Commissioner Cho was a shareholder in the company at that time and the facility was introduced without a risk analysis, exempted from LA City Fire regulations, CEQA, and a/so expedited through the permitting process. The two largest 12.5 million gallon butane tanks were built without LA City building permits at the time (1973) and only "certified" by building and safety 5 years later while the facility was in operation. The facility sits in the middle of an active LA City Planning documented "Earthquake Rupture Zone". The fault is the Palos Verdes Fault and it has a 7.3 magnitude capability. The tanks are "said" to be built to a seismic sub-standard of 5.5-6.0. The land that the tanks are located on is also identified by USGS as "landslide and liquefaction" areas. I am attaching the recent demand to Rancho LPG by the EPA on deficiencies identified by them two and three years ago but not complied with by Rancho. The list of issues related to jeopardy at this facility is extremely long. I don't want to encumber you with the litany of details at this point. Much of this information can be viewed on our website at: www.hazardsbegone.com We believe that the pure luck that has been protecting our area for so many years cannot last forever. The 40+ year old antiquated infrastructure, increasing probability of the big earthquake to our region, and the elevated terrorism risk contribute greatly to a likelihood of disaster here. UC Berkeley Professor Bob Bea (the expert in San Bruno, Katrina and Gulf disasters) has reviewed the situation with Rancho LPG and has warned of the extreme potential of a "domino effect" of catastrophe at this facility. Because of the facility's close proximity to a "multitude" of refineries, fuel and chemical storage facilities and oil terminals at the Port of LA (within 1/2 mi.) the potential for a devastating cascading event are to be emphasized. An event at this facility could result in the overwhelming decimation of the area and its population. We have been fighting with government officials and regulatory agencies for YEARS on this issue. We need assistance .... and we need it BEFORE the disaster. After reading the recent testimony of both you and Mr Holstrom we believe that finally .... finally .... the absence of logic it government as it relates to safety in these cases is beginning to resonate. Please help to bring sanity to this situation as soon as possible. Sincerely, Janet Gunter Member, San Pedro Peninsula Homeowners United ph: 310 251-7075 1 C-122 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Janet, Marcie Miller <marciesmiller@sbcglobal.net> Friday, April 05, 2013 7:32 PM Janet Gunter MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; det31 O@ca.rr.com; connie@rutter.us; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; chateau4us@att.net; Kit Fox; dan.weikel@latimes.com; louis.sahagun@latimes.com; ddbryan@cbs.com; hanslaetz@gmail.com; igornla@cox.net; dwgkaw@hotmail.com; Tena.Ezzeddine@nbcuni.com; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; lpryor@usc.edu; carl.southwell@gmail.com; overbid2002@yahoo.com; diananave@gmail.com; Vance.Bennett@calema.ca.gov; Lonna Calhoun <lonna@cope- preparedness.org>; STsumura@elsegundo.org; det31 O@juno.com; wesling.mary@epamail.epa.gov; m ichael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov; richard.vladovic@lausd.net Re: BOARD FAUL TS CALIFORNIA SAFETY REGULATIONS IN CHEVRON BLAZE I will distribute this at Coastal's Public Safety Committee meeting tomorrow. Thank you for your leadership on this very issue -the failure of regulatory agencies to intelligently regulate. How many accidents do we need for the oversight system to really work? Dr. Seuss understood but too well. "Oh, the jobs people work at! Out west near Hawtch-Hawtch there's a Hawtch-Hawtcher bee watcher, his job is to watch. Is to keep both his eyes on the lazy town bee, a bee that is watched will work harder you see. So he watched and he watched, but in spite of his watch that bee didn't work any harder not mawtch. So then somebody said "Our old bee-watching man just isn't bee watching as hard as he can, he ought to be watched by another Hawtch- Hawtcher! The thing that we need is a bee-watcher-watcher!". Well, the bee-watcher-watcher watched the bee- watcher. He didn't watch well so another Hawtch-Hawtcher had to come in as a watch-watcher-watcher! And now all the Hawtchers who live in Hawtch-Hawtch are watching on watch watcher watchering watch, watch watching the watcher who's watching that bee." Seriously worried, Marcie On Apr 5, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> wrote: http://news.yahoo.com/u-board-faults-california-safety-regulations-chevron-blaze-000352435. html U.S. board faults California safety regulations in Chevron blaze By Braden Reddall I Reuters -1 hr 25 mins ago • Email • Share~ • Tweet 1 C-123 • • • 13 View Photo Reuters/Reuters -Firefighters douse a flame at the Chevron oil refinery in in Richmond, California August 6, 2012. REUTERS/Josh Edelson By Braden Reddall RICHMOND, California (Reuters) -The federal agency investigating the fire that broke out in August at Chevron Corp's oil refinery in Richmond, California, faulted the state's regulatory system for not being proactive enough in preventing accidents. "The California process safety regulatory system lacked sufficient well-trained, technically competent staff and also lacked more rigorous regulatory requirements to require Chevron to reduce safety risk," said the U.S. Chemical Safety Board's lead investigator Dan Tillema at a public hearing in Richmond on Fr:iday. CSB Western Regional Director Don Holmstrom called upon California to change its regulatory system to one called "safety case" in which high-hazard industrial plants such as crude oil refineries would not be allowed to begin operating until they have proven they have reduced all safety risks to as low as reasonably practicable. "That is a pre-condition for operating," Holmstrom said in a prepared statement at a public hearing before California legislators on Friday. "There's a need for step change (in safety regulation)," Holmstrom said while answering questions during the Friday afternoon hearing. "The whole system needs improvement." Holmstrom said the change to a safety case system would be a reversal from the current system in which high-hazard facilities are allowed to operate and are punished when they have a mishap or found in violation of a regulation. Chevron said it would look at proposed changes in safety regulations. 'We will engage in constructive dialogue regarding any proposed industry-wide regulations that will allow us to remain competitive and operate at the highest levels of safety," said Chevron spokeswoman Melissa Ritchie. In preliminary other findings released in the weeks following the fire, the Chemical Safety Board has faulted Chevron's failure to replace a heavily corroded pipe on the 245,000 barrel-per-day crude distillation unit that ruptured setting off the fire, which caused only minor injuries at the second-largest refinery in California. The board has also criticized the refinery for failing to shut the unit down when it sent firefighters on August 6 to try and find the leak. California's worker safety regulator the California Occupational Safety & Health' Division (Cal/OSHA) fined Chevron $963,000 on January 30 for 25 violations of worker safety regulations. 2 C-124 Holmstrom praised Cal/OSHA as better than many state safety regulators, but said it was one of three agencies with regulatory authority over the plant. Cal/OSHA Chief Ellen Widess said the agency inspected Chevron's Los Angeles-area refinery in El Segundo, California, following the Richmond fire. The company was required to replace corroded pipe on a crude unit similar to the one in Richmond. The work was done in October. Contra Costa County officials said they are ordering Chevron to pay for a full safety inspection of the refinery. Refiners Exxon Mobil Corp, Royal Dutch Shell Pie and Valero Energy Corp, which operate plants in California, declined to discuss the recommended change in high-hazard facility regulation. CSB is only an investigative agency, charged with seeking the root cause of chemical plant accidents and making recommendations to the industry. The board has no power to fine companies or issue regulations. (Reporting by Braden Reddall and Erwin Seba. Editing by Andre Grenon and Lisa Shumaker) 3 C-125 Kit Fox From: Sent: To: Subject: Janet Gunter <arriane5@aol.com> Friday, April 05, 2013 6:47 PM MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; det310@ca.rr.com; connie@rutter.us; jody.james@sbcglobal.net; chateau4us@att.net; Kit Fox; dan.weikel@latimes.com; louis.sahagun@latimes.com; ddbryan@cbs.com; hanslaetz@gmail.com; igornla@cox.net; dwgkaw@hotmail.com; marciesmiller@sbcglobal.net; Tena.Ezzeddine@nbcuni.com; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; lpryor@usc.edu; earl .southwell@gmail.com; overbid2002@yahoo.com; diananave@gmail.com; Vance.Bennett@calema.ca.gov; connie@rutter.us; MrEnvirlaw@sbcglobal.net; noelweiss@ca.rr.com; lpryor@usc.edu; bea@ce.berkeley.edu; Lonna Calhoun <lonna@cope-preparedness.org>; STsumura@elsegundo.org; igornla@cox.net; dwgkaw@hotmail.com; marciesm iller@sbcglobal.net; det31 O@juno.com; wesling .mary@epamail.epa.gov; michael_ davies@feinstein.senate.gov; lisa.pinto@mail.house.gov; hamilton.cloud@mail.house.gov; richard.vladovic@lausd.net BOARD FAUL TS CALIFORNIA SAFETY REGULATIONS IN CHEVRON BLAZE http://news.yahoo.com/u-board-faults-california-safety-regulations-chevron-blaze-000352435.html U.S. board faults California safety regulations in Chevron blaze By Braden Reddall I Reuters -1 hr 25 mins ago • Email • Share~ • Tweet 13 • • • 1 C-126 View Photo Reuters/Reuters -Firefighters douse a flame at the Chevron oil refinery in in Richmond, California August 6, 2012. REUTERS/Josh Edelson By Braden Reddall RICHMOND, California (Reuters) -The federal agency investigating the fire that broke out in August at Chevron Corp's oil refinery in Richmond, California, faulted the state's regulatory system for not being proactive enough in preventing accidents. "The California process safety regulatory system lacked sufficient well-trained, technically competent staff and also lacked more rigorous regulatory requirements to require Chevron to reduce safety risk," said the U.S. Chemical Safety Board's lead investigator Dan Tillema at a public hearing in Richmond on Friday. CSB Western Regional Director Don Holmstrom called upon California to change its regulatory system to one called "safety case" in which high-hazard industrial plants such as crude oil refineries would not be allowed to begin operating until they have proven they have reduced all safety risks to as low as reasonably practicable. "That is a pre-condition for operating," Holmstrom said in a prepared statement at a public hearing before California legislators on Friday. "There's a need for step change (in safety regulation)," Holmstrom said while answering questions during the Friday afternoon hearing. "The whole system needs improvement." Holmstrom said the change to a safety case system would be a reversal from the current system in which high-hazard facilities are allowed to operate and are punished when they have a mishap or found in violation of a regulation. Chevron said it would look at proposed changes in safety regulatioris. 'We will engage in constructive dialogue regarding any proposed industry-wide regulations that will allow us to remain competitive and operate at the highest levels of safety," said Chevron spokeswoman Melissa Ritchie. In preliminary other findings released in the weeks following the fire, the Chemical Safety Board has faulted Chevron's failure to replace a heavily corroded pipe on the 245,000 barrel-per-day crude distillation unit that ruptured setting off the fire, which caused only minor injuries at the second-largest refinery in California. The board has also criticized the refinery for failing to shut the unit down when it sent firefighters on August 6 to try and find the leak. California's worker safety regulator the California Occupational Safety & Health Division (Cal/OSHA) fined Chevron $963,000 on January 30 for 25 violations of worker safety regulations. Holmstrom praised Cal/OSHA as better than many state safety regulators, but said it was one of three agencies with regulatory authority over the plant. Cal/OSHA Chief Ellen Widess said the agency inspected Chevron's Los Angeles-area refinery in El Segundo, California, following the Richmond fire. The company was required to replace corroded pipe on a crude unit similar to the one in Richmond. The work was done in October. Contra Costa County officials said they are ordering Chevron to pay for a full safety inspection of the refinery. Refiners Exxon Mobil Corp, Royal Dutch Shell Pie and Valero Energy Corp, which operate plants in California, declined to discuss the recommended change in high-hazard facility regulation. 2 C-127 CSB is only an investigative agency, charged with seeking the root cause of chemical plant accidents and making recommendations to the industry. The board has no power to fine companies or issue regulations. (Reporting by Braden Reddall and Erwin Seba. Editing by Andre Grenon and Lisa Shumaker) 3 C-128 U.S. board faults California safety regulations in Chevron blaze -Yahoo! News Page 1 of2 U.S. board faults California safety regulation blaze REUTERS By Braden Reddall I Reuters -Fri, Apr 5, 2013 By ~~~~~~--~~g~~~~); ~9.~.~Q~.P.?.9.~~-~f!?.~.~~-~ (Reuters) -The federal agency investigating the fire that broke refinery in Richmond, California, faulted the state's ~~g-~-~J.~tQry,.~Y.~~~~ for not being pro accidents. "The 9~~~f?.~~i~.J?.~.<?.~~~~.~~K~~Y. regulatory system lacked sufficient well-trained, technica more rigorous regulatory requirements to require Chevron to reduce safety risk," said tl investigator Dan Tillema at a public hearing in Richmond on Friday. 9~.~ .. Y.Y.~~~~E~ .. ~~g!.<?.~~~.R.~E~~~<?.E.P..<?.~ .. ~Q~!~~~-~Q~ called upon 9~~~f.?.~.~!.~ to change its re; case" in which high-hazard industrial plants such as crude oil refineries would not be al have proven they have reduced all safety risks to as low as reasonably practicable. "That is a pre-condition for operating," Holmstrom said in a prepared statement at a pt legislators on Friday. "There's a need for step change (in safety regulation)," Holmstrom said while answerin~ afternoon hearing. "The whole system needs improvement." Holmstrom said the change to a safety case system would be a reversal from the curren1 facilities are allowed to operate and are punished when they have a mishap or found in Chevron said it would look at proposed changes in safety regulations. "We will engage in constructive dialogue regarding any proposed industry-wide regulat competitive and operate at the highest levels of safety," said Chevron spokeswoman Me In preliminary other findings released in the weeks following the fire, the Chemical Saf€ failure to replace .,,~·-";~'m·"""1~''""~'·1'"i"'"'~·-,,.,,;,~.,,,a_,, .. ~~~~··"':'";·on~'1'<?'mJ,;-.-0:'l)k""'"Y"""'"",;J."'F'"'"""'~'""'"''''"""""~'°"!,ll.:1~ fire, which cause A new Yahoo.com experience. Smartj fast and p http://news.yahoo.com/u-board-faults-califomia-safety-regulations-chevron-blaze-0003 524... 512412013 C-129 U.S. board faults California safety regulations in Chevron blaze -Yahoo! News Page 2 of2 The board has also criticized the refinery for failing to shut the unit down when it sent f find the leak. California's worker safety regulator the California Occupational Safety & Health Divisio $g63,ooo on January 30 for 25 violations of worker safety regulations. Holmstrom praised Cal/OSHA as better than many state safety regulators, but said it w regulatory authority over the plant. Cal/OSHA Chief Ellen Witless said the agency inspected Chevron's Los Angeles-area reJ following the Richmond fire. The company was required to replace corroded pipe on a c Richmond. The work was done in October. Contra Co'sta County officials said they are ordering Chevron to pay for a full safety insJ Refiners Exxon Mobil Corp, Royal Dutch Shell Pie and Valero Energy Corp, which oper; discuss the recommended change in high-hazard facility regulation. CSB is only an investigative agency, charged with seeking the root cause of chemical pla recommendations to the industry. The board has no power to fine companies or issue r1 (Reporting by Braden Reddall and Erwin Seba. Editing by Andre Grenon and Lisa Shur A new Vahoo .. c·om experience. Smart, fast and p http://news.yahoo.com/u-board-faults-califomia-safety-regulations-chevron-blaze-0003 524... 512412013 C-130 Daily Breeze article regarding Marymount College C-131 http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/ci,.23223779/marymount-college-rancho-palos-verdes-rebounds-after-period Marymount College in Rancho Palos Verdes rebounds after period of struggle By Rob Kuznia, Staff Writer Daily Breeze Posted: DailyBreeze.com Marymount College in Rancho Palos Verdes honored 139 students at its graduation ceremony Saturday, the largest number in years and a reflection of the school's expanding mission and footprint. The small Catholic college, which faced an existential threat just three years ago due to sagging enrollment, now serves a record-high 1,000 students. That's more than double the head count of the 2009-10 school year, when the decline led to a deep round of staff and faculty layoffs. The rebound coincides with a slew of changes that have transformed the 45-year-old institution from a private junior college overlooking the Pacific Ocean to a school that offers bachelor's degree options, features more athletic programs and boasts a growing physical presence in San Pedro. Come fall, the private college will add another feather in its cap: graduate programs. In recognition of these and other changes, the college as of Aug. 1 will officially be known as Marymount California University. "While it's been a difficult four or five years for the university to find its footing and stability in the Great Recession, I can say this is the strongest the college -now university -has ever been on any number of levels," said Marymount President Michael Brophy. Saturday marked the second graduation ceremony in which a sizable portion of the graduates -this year it was more than a third -picked up a bachelor's degree in one of four disciplines: business, liberal arts, media studies and psychology. The others earned associate degrees. While Brophy ties the low times mostly to the economy, the recent rise in enrollment is also an indication that the college has been able to move on after a recent political blow. In 2010, voters in Rancho Palos Verdes rejected the college's bid to build dormitories on its 25-acre campus. Since that contentious ordeal, the college has been received with enthusiasm by neighboring San Pedro, officially the southernmost community of Los Angeles. In April, the Los Angeles City Planning Commission granted final approval of a plan allowing the college to add to a cluster of dormitories on Palos Verdes Drive North in northern San Pedro. The plan increases the cap on the number of students who can be housed there from the current 300 to 800. It also allows the college to build classrooms book stores, cafes and other student services on the property. Marymount is also expanding its presence in downtown San Pedro. The development of what is known as the Waterfront Campus began in fall of 2011, when most of the upper-division courses for the bachelor degree programs moved into the first floor of the 11-story Pacific Place Office Building, formerly occupied by Nqrthrop Grumman offices. Around the same time, the college took up residence in three additional downtown structures in the historic district on Sixth Street: Warner Grand Theatre, the Arcade Gallery and the Grand Annex. Most recently, philanthropists Marylyn and Chuck Klaus donated a namesake building to the school in the same district. Some are hoping to turn the area into something that resembles Westwood Village near UCLA, said Marymount College spokeswoman Kelly Curtis Intagliata. "It brings economic development to an area that sorely needs it," she said. Tuition at Marymount College runs about $30,000 a year, and exceeds $40,000 for students who live on campus. But school officials say just 30 percent of the students pay full tuition. Others receive scholarships and assistance under Page I of2 May 13, 2013 08:32:21AM MDT C-132 http://www.dailybreeze.corn/news/c(_ 23 223 779/marymount-co llege-rancho-palos-verdes-rebounds-after-period the auspices of any number of foundations. The student body is diverse. A third of the students are Latino, another third are white and 10 percent are black. A little less than half of the student body identifies as Catholic. "We really look like L.A.," Brophy said. Some 15 percent of the students are athletes who compete in on one of the college's five athletic sports, three of which -golf, cross-country and track and field -were added this year. Marymount students are not required to take a theology course. But freshmen must sign up for a community service program in which students perform volunteer work for organizations such as the Boys and Girls Club of Los Angeles Harbor and the Toberman Neighborhood Center in San Pedro serving low-income families. The college this fall is adding two graduate-degree programs: community psychology and leadership and community development. The school hopes to add an MBA program in the fall of2014. Marymount also will open a satellite campus in Northern California this fall that caters only to professionals -such as teachers and law enforcement officers -who are seeking additional training. That office will be in the tiny community of Lucerne in Lake County. Page 2 of2 May 13, 2013 08:32:21AM MDT C-133 Los Angeles City Planning Commission agenda C-134 lnformaci6n en Espanol acerca de estajunta puede ser obtenida l/amando al (213) 978-1300 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING THURSDAY, APRIL 11, 2013, after 8:30 a.m. CITY HALL -PUBLIC WORKS BOARD ROOM 350 200 N. MAIN STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 William Roschen, FAIA, President Regina M. Freer, Vice President Sean 0. Burton, Commissioner Diego Cardoso, Commissioner Camilla Eng, Commissioner George Hovaguimian, Commissioner Robert Lessin, Commissioner Dana Perlman, Commissioner Barbara Romero, Commissioner Michael J. LoGrande, Director Alan Bell, AICP, Deputy Director Lisa M. Webber AICP, Deputy Director Eva Yuan-McDaniel, Deputy Director James K. Williams, Commission Executive Assistant II POLICY FOR DESIGNATED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS No(s) 6 Pursuant to the Commission's general operating procedures, the Commission at times must necessarily limit the speaking times of those presenting testimony on either side of an issue that is designated as a public hearing item. In all instances, however, equal time is allowed for presentation of pros and cons of matters to be acted upon. All requests to address the Commission on public hearing items must be submitted prior to the Commission's consideration of the item. EVERY PERSON WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION MUST COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S REQUEST FORM AND SUBMIT IT TO THE COMMISSION STAFF. The Commission has adopted rules regarding written submissions to ensure that it has reasonable and appropriate opportunity to review your materials. The mailing and email addresses, deadlines, page limits, and required numbers of copies for your advance submissions may be found under "Forms and Instructions". Day of hearing submissions (15 copies must be provided) are limited to 2 pages plus accompanying photographs, posters, and PowerPoint presentations of 5 minutes or less. Non-complying materials will NOT be distributed to the Commission. The Commission may ADJOURN FOR LUNCH at approximately 12:00 Noon. Any cases not acted upon during the morning session will be considered after lunch. TIME SEGMENTS noted* herein are approximate. Some items may be delayed due to length of discussion of previous items. The Commission may RECONSIDER and alter its action taken on items listed herein at any time during this meeting or during the next regular meeting, in accordance with the Commission Policies and Procedures and provided that the Commission retains jurisdiction over the case. In the case of a Commission meeting cancellation, all items shall be continued to the next regular meeting date or beyond, as long as the continuance is within the legal time limits of the case or cases. Sign language, interpreters, assistive listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or other services may be provided upon request. To ensure availability of services, please make your request no later than three working days (72 hours) prior to the meeting by calling the Commission Executive Assistant at (213) 978-1300 or by e-mail at CPC@lacity.org. If you challenge these agenda items in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing agenized here, or in written correspondence on these matters delivered to this agency at or prior to the public hearing. If you seek judicial review of any decision of the City pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, the petition for writ of mandate pursuant to that section must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the City's decision became final pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. There may be other time limits which also affect your ability to seek judicial review. AGENDAS are posted for public review in the Main Street lobby of City Hall East, 200 No. Main Street, Los Angeles, California, and are accessible through the Internet at www.planning.lacity.org. Click the Meetings and Hearings• link. Commission meetings may be heard on Council Phone by dialing (213) 621-2489 or (818) 904-9450. GLOSSARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL TERMS: CEQA -Calif. Environmental Quality Act EIR -Environmental Impact Report CE -Categorical Exemption ND -Negative Declaration MND -Mitigated Negative Declaration C-135 1. DIRECTOR'S REPORT A Update on City Planning Commission Status Reports and Active Assignments 1. Ongoing Status Reports: 2. City Council/PLUM Calendar and Actions 3. List of Pending Legislation (Ordinance Update) B. Legal actions and rulings update C. Other items of interest: 2. COMMISSION BUSINESS A Advance Calendar B. Commission Request C. Minutes of Meeting -March 28, 2013 3. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD The Commission shall provide an opportunity in open meetings for the public to address it, for a cumulative total of up to thirty (30) minutes, on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. (This requirement is in addition to any other hearing required or imposed by law.) PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK MUST SUBMIT A SPEAKER'S REQUEST FORM. ALL REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS AND ITEMS OF INTEREST TO THE PUBLIC THAT ARE WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. Individual testimony within the public comment period shall be limited as follows: (a) For non-agendized matters, up to five (5) minutes per person and up to ten (10) minutes per subject. (b) For agendized matters, up to three (3) minutes per person and up to ten (10) minutes per subject. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THESE ITEMS WILL BE DEFERRED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS EACH ITEM IS CALLED FOR CONSIDERATION. The Chair of the Commission may allocate the number of speakers per subject, the time allotted each subject, and the time allotted each speaker. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 2 APRIL 11, 2013 C-136 4. CPC-2011-2157-ZC-HD-CU-ZV-SPR CEQA: ENV-2011-2158-MND Council District: 13 -Garcetti Expiration Date: 4-13-13 Plan Area: Hollywood Appeal Status: Appealable to City Council; ZC appealable (by applicant only) if it is disapproved in whole or in part PUBLIC HEARING -Completed on March 11, 2013 Location: Proposed Project: 1600, 1604, 1606, 1608, 1610, 1612, 1614, 1616, 1616 %, 1618, 1618 %, 1620, 1622 HIGHLAND AVENUE; 1600, 1606, 1612, 1616, 1622 N. MCCADDEN PLACE; 1601, 1607, 1611, 1617 N. MCCADDEN PLACE; 6766, 6766 Yi W. HAWTHORN AVENUE; 6709, 6733, 6735, 6757, 6757 %, 6759, 6759 %, 6761, 6763, 6765, 6767, 6773, 6775, 6777 W. SELMA AVENUE The proposed project will include the construction of two mixed-use commercial and residential buildings ("Building A and Building B") that will include 248 residential units and 12,672 square feet of retail uses. Building A will consist of a total of 138,947 square feet-12,203 square feet of retail uses and 134 residential units. Building B will consist of a total of 110,775 square feet -469 square feet of retail uses and 114 residential units. Both buildings will be constructed to a height of 6 stories (Building A will be 82' 6" in height and Building B will be 80' 6" in height). The existing Panavision building (24,266 square feet in size) and a commercial building (11 ,900 square feet in size) are located within the site boundary and, as part of this project, will be maintained as post production, trade school, and office facilities. Including these 36, 166 square-foot existing structures (the Panavision and commercial buildings), the project will include a maximum of 285,888 square feet of floor area resulting in an approximate 2.42:1 floor area ratio (FAR) averaged across the site (285,888 square feet of floor area / 118,049.5 square feet of lot area). A total of 538 parking spaces will be provided. The site consists of 22 total parcels totaling 2. 7 acres on two separate blocks (approximately 118, 049.5 square feet). Existing uses on the site include the Panavision building, surface parking lots, and a commercial building at the corner of Highland and Hawthorn Avenue. The applicant seeks a Zone/Height District Change and a Conditional Use Permit for the averaging of FAR forthe entire site (2.42:1 FAR averaged over the entire site), parking variances to reduce required parking (requesting 538 parking spaces in lieu of the required 584 parking spaces), and a Site Plan Review. Requested Actions: 1. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.32 of the Municipal Code, a Zone/Height District Change from the existing C4-2D-SN and C4-2D zone to the C4-2-SN and C4-2 zone. 2. Pursuant to Section 12.24 W.19 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) a Conditional Use Approval to permit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Averaging in a Unified Development totaling 2.42: 1 FAR averaged across the site (285,888 square feet of floor area) / 118,049.5 square feet of lot area) where a 3:1 FAR is permitted. 3. Pursuant to Section 12.27 of the LAMC a Variance from Section 12.21 A.4 of the LAMC to permit 538 parking spaces in lieu of the required 584 parking spaces. 4. Pursuant to Section 16.05 of the Municipal Code, Site Plan Review for a project which results in an increase of 50 or more dwelling units. 5. Consideration of Mitigated Negative Declaration ENV-2011-2158-MND for the above referenced project. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 3 APRIL11,2013 C-137 5. Applicant: Robert Champion, Highland Selma Venture, LLC Representative: Jerry Neuman -Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP Recommended Actions: 1. Deny without Prejudice a Zone/Height District Change from the existing C4-2D-SN and C4-2D zone to the C4-2-SN and C4-2 zone. 2. Approve a Conditional Use Approval to permit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Averaging in a Unified Development totaling 2.42:1 FAR averaged across the site (285,888 square feet of floor area I 118,049.5 square feet of lot area) where a 3: 1 FAR is permitted. 3. Approve a Variance from Section 12.21 A.4 of the LAMC to permit 538 parking spaces in lieu of the required 584 parking spaces. 4. Approve the Site Plan Review Findings for a project which results in an increase of 50 or more dwelling units. 5. Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration ENV-2011-2158-MND. Staff: Blake Lamb (213) 978-1167 CPC-2011-2480-CU CEQA: ENV-2011-2478-MND Plan Area: Wilmington-Harbor City PUBLIC HEARING -Completed on January 24. 2013 Council District: 15 -Buscaino Expiration Date: 4-11-13 Appeal Status: Appealable to City Council Location: 1600 PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH Proposed Project: The subject site is currently developed with 86 dwelling units that provide off-campus housing for students attending the Marymount College Rancho Palos Verdes Campus. The stated goal of the College is to develop a five phase undergraduate and graduate campus, which at total build out would accommodate 1 ,500 students, with 847 students being housed on the site. The project proposes: to convert the garages of the existing dwellings into additional bedrooms, construct a surface parking lot along Palos Verdes Drive, construct new structures comprised of a 27,000 square foot dining facility, with classrooms and administrative offices, (called the Old Main), a 17,500 square foot building located south of Old Main containing classrooms, laboratories design studios and administrative offices and a 4,077 square foot maintenance building. The proposed buildings will be two to four stories 30-75 feet in height. The Old Main building will have an 87 foot 6 inches in height tower element which will serve as a focal point for the campus. Requested Actions: 1. Pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.24U.6 of the Municipal Code, a Conditional Use authorizing the construction of a five phased college campus in the RD6 zone. 2. Pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 F, modifications of the following height and area regulations are being requested: a. From LAMC Section 12.21.1 to permit the proposed campus buildings to have a variable range of stories from three (3) to four (4) stories, and heights ranging from 36 feet to 75 feet (including elevator towers) for the required classroom buildings and residence halls, and 87 feet 6 inches for the administration building tower feature instead of the 30-feet permitted in the 1 XL zone. b. From LAMC Section 12.09.1 B 3 to maintain the existing rear yard setback of 10 feet instead of the 25 foot rear yard required in the RD6 zone. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 4 APRIL 11, 2013 C-138 6. c. From LAMC Section 12.21C.3 (b) to allow a reduced side yard setback of 10 feet instead of the 50 feet required for institutional yards. In addition, a modification approval to allow the security guard building to be located within 1 O foot the western side yard setback and a 6-feet in height pedestrian gate (with a 13 foot 4 inch arch) and wall to be located within the front yard setback. 3. Consideration of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ENV-2011-2478-MND for the above referenced project. Applicant: Marymount College Representative: James Krause Recommended Actions: 1. Approve the Conditional Use authorizing the construction of a college campus in the RD6 zone, subject to the conditions of approval. 2. Approve the requested Modification to permit the proposed campus buildings to have a variable range of stories from three (3) to four (4) stories, and heights ranging from 36 feet to 75 feet (including elevator towers) for the required classroom buildings and residence halls, and 87 feet 6 inche~ for the administration building tower feature instead of the 30-feet permitted in the 1 XL zone. 3. Approve the requested Modification of the area regulations to permit a reduction to maintain the existing rear yard setback of 10-feet instead of the 25-foot rear yard required in the RD6 zone. 4. Approve the requested Modification of the area regulations to allow the following: the maintaining of the existing reduced side yard setback of 10 feet instead of the 50 feet required for institutional yards, the security guard building to be located within the eastern side yard setback, and a 6-feet in height pedestrian gate (with a 13 foot 4 inch arch) and wall to be located within the front yard setback. 5. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, ENV-2011-2478-MND-REC. 6. Adopt the Findings. 7. Advise the applicant that, pursuant to California State Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City will monitor or require evidence that any mitigation conditions are implemented and maintained throughout the life of the project and the City may require any necessary fees to cover the cost of such monitoring. 8. Advise the applicant that pursuant to State Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, a Fish and Game Fee and/or certificate of Fee Exemption is now required to be submitted to the County Clerk prior to or concurrent with the Environmental Notice of Determination (NOD) filing. Staff: CPC-2006-5567-CPU CEQA: ENV-2008-478-EIR Greg Shoop (213) 978-1243 Plan Area: West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert Council District: 5 -Koretz, 8 -Parks, 10 -Wesson Expiration Date: N/A Appeal Status: Not appealable LIMITED PUBLIC HEARING-Public hearing held on January 15, 2013 Location: Proposed Project: GENERALLY BOUNDED BY PICO AND VENICE BOULEVARDS TO THE NORTH, CITY OF INGLEWOOD TO THE SOUTH, ARLINGTON AND VAN NESS AVENUES TO THE EAST, AND CULVER CITY TO THE WEST West Adams -Baldwin Hills -Leimert New Community Plan: The West Adams -Baldwin Hills -Leimert New Community Plan (Proposed Plan) revises and updates the current West Adams -Baldwin Hills - Leimert Community Plan Text and Land Use Diagram to reflect changes in existing conditions since the CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 5 APRIL11,2013 C-139 last plan update in 1998, such as the opening of five Metro Expo Line stations and the planning of the Metro Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor. The Proposed Plan includes new goals, policies, and implementation programs; revisions to the Citywide General Plan Framework Element, General Plan Land Use Designations; creation of a Community Plan Implementation Overlay District as well as Specific Plan Amendments, Zone and Height District changes; and Street Reclassifications. Requested Actions: 1. Pursuant to procedures set forth in Section 11.5.6 of the Municipal Code and City Charter Sections 555 and 558, amend the West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert Community Plan as part of the General Plan of the City of Los Angeles, as modified in the West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert New Community Plan Resolution, the West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert New Community Plan Text and Change Maps and Additional Plan Map Symbol, Footnote, Corresponding Zone and Land Use Nomenclature Changes. 2. Pursuant to Sections 11.5.7.G., 16.50.D., 12.32. and 12.04 of the Municipal Code and City Charter Section 558, amend the Crenshaw Corridor Specific Plan, as shown in the proposed Crenshaw Corridor Specific Plan Amendments. 3. Pursuant to Section 13.14.C., 12.32, and 12.04 of the Municipal Code and City Charter Section 558, adopt the West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert Community Plan Implementation Overlay (CPIO) Distri'ct, as shown in the proposed CPIO Subdistrict Ordinances. 4. Pursuant to Section 12.32 of the Municipal Code, adopt rezoning actions to effect changes of zone as identified on the Land Use Change Map, Land Use Change Matrix and Proposed Zoning Map. 5. Pursuant to procedures set forth in Section 11.5.6 of the Municipal Code and City Charter Sections 555 and 558, amend the Highways and Freeways Map of the Transportation Element of the General Plan to reclassify selected streets within the West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert New Community Plan as shown on the Street Redesignation Matrix. 6. Pursuant to procedures set forth in Section 11.5.6 of the Municipal Code and City Charter Sections 555 and 558, amend the Long Range Land Use Diagram of the Citywide General Plan Framework Element to reflect changes and modifications to the geography of neighborhood districts, community centers, regional centers, and mixed use boulevards as shown on the Proposed Long Range Land Use Diagram Framework Map. 7. Consideration of the Draft Environmental Impact Report ENV-2008-478-EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2008021013) in its determination approving the Proposed Plan and transmission of the EIR to the City Council for certification. Applicant: City of Los Angeles Recommended Actions: 1. Conduct a limited public hearing on the Proposed Plan, as modified in the staff report. 2. Approve the Staff Report as the Commission Report. 3. Approve and Recommend that the Mayor approve and the City Council adopt the West Adams- Baldwin Hills-Leimert New Community Plan Resolution, the West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert New Community Plan Text, Change Maps and Additional Plan Map Symbol, Footnote, Corresponding Zone and Land Use Nomenclature Changes amending the West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert New Community Plan as part of the General Plan of the City of Los Angeles, as modified. 4. Approve and Recommend that the City Council adopt the requested rezoning actions to effect changes of zone as identified in the Proposed Land Use and Zone Change Subarea Map, the Proposed Land Use and Zone Change Subarea Matrix, the Proposed Community Plan Implementation Overlay (CPIO) District, and the Proposed Crenshaw Corridor Specific Plan Amendments. 5. Approve and Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the existing Crenshaw Corridor Specific Plan (Ordinance No. 176,230) pursuant to procedures set forth in CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 6 APRIL11,2013 C-140 Section 11.5. 7 (Specific Plan Procedures) and Section 16.50 (Design Review Board Procedures) of the Municipal Code. 6. Instruct the Department of City Planning to finalize the necessary zone change ordinances to be presented to City Council, and make other technical corrections as necessary. 7. Amend the Highways and Freeways Map of the Transportation Element of the General Plan to reclassify selected streets within the West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert New Community Plan as shown on the Street Redesignation Matrix. 8. Amend the Long-Range Land Use Diagram of the Citywide General Plan Framework Element to reflect changes and modifications to the geography of neighborhood districts, community centers, regional centers, and mixed use boulevards as shown on the Proposed General Plan Framework Map. 9. Authorize the Director of Planning to present the resolution, Plan text and Plan amendments to the Mayor and City Council, in accordance with Sections 555 and 558 of the City Charter. 10. Find that in accordance with Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 13.14 C.5, the proposed supplemental development regulations of the Community Plan Implementation Overlay (CPIO) District are consistent with, and necessary to implement the goals, policies, programs and design guidelines of the West Adams-Baldwin Hills-Leimert Community Plan. 11. Find .that the City Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Draft Environmental Impact Report ENV-2008-478-EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2008021013) in its determination approving the Proposed Plan and transmit the EIR to the City Council for certification. 12. Recommend that the City Council consider a Statement of Overriding Considerations with the Final Environmental Impact Report. 13. Approve and Recommend that the City Council Adopt the Findings, and direct staff to prepare additional environmental findings for City Council consideration. Staff: Reuben Caldwell (213) 978-1209 The next scheduled regular meeting of the City Planning Commission will be held at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, April 25. 2013 Van Nuys City Hall Council Chamber 2"d Floor 14410 Sylvan Street Van Nuys, CA 91401 An Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer As a covered entity under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Los Angeles does not discriminate. The meeting facility and its parking are wheelchair accessible. Translation services, sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or other services must be requested 72 hours prior to the meeting by calling the Planning Commission Secretariat at (213) 978-1300 or by email at CPC@lacity.org. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 APRIL 11, 2013 C-141 Comments on the Port Master Plan Update and Draft Program Environmental Impact Report C-142 CITY OF 2 April 2013 Port of Los Angeles Planning & Economic Development Division 425 S. Palos Verdes St. San Pedro, CA 90731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE ADMINISTRATION VIA ELECTRONIC & U.S. MAIL SUBJECT: City of Rancho Palos Verdes' Comments on Draft Port Master Plan To Whom It May Concern: The City of Rancho Palos Verdes-located just west of the San Pedro community of the City of Los Angeles-appreciates the opportunity to review the Port of Los Angeles' Draft Port Master Plan. We have reviewed the Plan and offer the following comments: 1. Section 5.0 of the Plan describes the five (5) planning areas of the Plan, including the designation and acreage of land uses therein. We understand that the Plan proposes to eliminate liquid bulk storage within Planning Area 1 (located nearest to densely-populated areas in San Pedro and Rancho Palos Verdes) and to designate at least one hundred sixty-six acres (166 ac.) within Planning Areas 2 and 3 for liquid bulk storage. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes is sup- portive of any plan that would reduce the risk of exposing residents to the hazards related to the storage and transport of liquid bulk cargoes. We further suggest that the Port should make additional provisions in the Plan to facilitate the relocation of liquid bulk storage facil.ities to the harbor area, including the future 200-acre Pier 500 project within Planning Area 3 (i.e., Terminal Island). 2. Section 8.0 of the Plan describes the Risk Management Plan (RMP) for the Port. We understand that the stated intent of the RMP "is to assess the potential risks of the storage and transfer of hazardous commodities occurring at liquid bulk terminals within the Port." To this end, we offer the following observations: a. Although apparently not mandated by the California Coastal Commission, we believe that the RMP should also include a "good faith" effort to assess the risks associated with the storage and handling of hazardous liquid bulk cargoes on vessels, tanker trucks, rail tank cars and in pipelines, at least within the areas covered by the Plan. To do so would demonstrate the :3094U HAWTHORNE B!VU. / i.(f\NCHO Fl'\LO~\ VFl·fflfS. C;'.\ £l02i'f,-f<lil1 i (;310) !A4-S2U5 /FAX (310) !i44·~)291 VV\!v'W rAl.1~\SVt !-(t)f:.S. C0M/HP\ I 'RIN H D ON f{FC\'Ci FU il">PH< C-143 Port of Los Angeles 2 April 2013 Page2 Port's willingness to provide more than the minimum, statutorily-required protection and notification to "vulnerable resources." b. We note that the RMP identifies "[residents] living in the area around the Port [as] the largest and most vulnerable number of people exposed to risks." It also specifically identifies certain critical Port infrastructure (i.e., the Vincent Thomas and Badger Avenue bridges) as "vulnerable resources." The RMP discusses "hazard footprints" in terms of potential adverse impacts upon these "vulnerable resources," including radiant heat, toxic and/or flammable vapor cloud, blast overpressure and flying debris However, the RMP provides no specifics or details regarding the location or extent of these "hazard footprints" for either existing or proposed liquid bulk facilities in the Port. 3. Section 9.0 of the Plan summarizes the Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) prepared for the Plan. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes will be commenting separately on the Draft PEIR, on or before the end of the public comment period on 8 April 2013. Again, thank you very much for the opportunity to review and comment upon this important project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (310) 544-5226 or via e-mail at kitf@rpv.com Sincerely, 1//7 Kit Fox, AICP Senior Administrative Analyst cc: Mayor Susan Brooks and City Council Carolyn Lehr, City Manager Carolynn Petru, Deputy City Manager Border Issues file M:\Border lssues\LA Port Master Plan Update\20130402_POLA_DraftPMPComments.docx C-144 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 8 April 2013 VIA ELECTRONIC & U.S. MAIL Christopher Cannon, Director of Environmental Management Los Angeles Harbor Department 425 S. Palos Verdes St. San Pedro, CA 90731 SUBJECT: City of Rancho Palos Verdes' Comments on Draft Program Environ- mental Impact Report for the Port Master Plan Update Dear Mr. Cannon: The City of Rancho Palos Verdes appreciates the opportunity to review the draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the Port Master Plan Update (PMPU). We have reviewed the PEIR and offer the following comments: 1. Section 3.7 of the PEIR discusses the hazards and hazardous materials impacts of the PMPU. The two (2) relevant mitigation measures proposed in Section 3.7 are in response to "reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment" (i.e., Impact HAZ-2). However, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes respectfully suggests that Section 3.7 of the PEIR requires additional analysis in the following issue areas: a. The analysis of Impact HAZ-1 (i.e., relating to "[hazards] to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials") concludes that impacts will be less-than-significant and that no mitigation is warranted because these activities are already "extensively regulated ... to prevent releases and accidents, and ensure the capability to respond in the event of an accident." From our review of the draft PMPU document, we understand that the California Coastal Commission does not mandate the assessment of risks associated with the storage and handling of hazardous liquid bulk cargoes on vess~ls, tanker trucks, rail tank cars and in pipelines as a part of a port master plan. However, we believe that the PEIR should include a "good faith" effort to assess these risks as well. To do so would demonstrate the Port's willingness to provide more than the minimum, statutorily-required protection and notification to vulnerable resources and populations in the vicinity of the Port. 30940 HAWTHORNE BLVD I RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90275-5391 / (310) 544-5205 /FAX (3'10) 544-5291 E-MAIL· CLEHR@RPV.COM / WW\1\/.PALOSVEROES.COM/RPV PRINTED ON RE(fYCLED PAPE:R C-145 Christopher Cannon 8 April 2013 Page2 b. The analysis of Impact HAZ-2 (i.e., relating to "reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment") concludes that there are potentially-significant impacts related to the risk of hazardous materials releases into the waters of the Port, and suggests two (2) mitigation measures that would only apply to "projects involving hazardous liquid bulk facilities with in-water operations." The PEIR briefly discusses the Port's Risk Management Plan (RMP) as the means by which conflicts between liquid bulk facilities and vulnerable resources and populations are to be resolved. From our review of the draft PMPU document, we understand that this is to be done through the Port's assessment and identification of any overlapping "hazard footprints" for liquid bulk facilities and nearby vulnerable resources and/or populations. However, neither the PEIR nor the PMPU provides any specifics or details regarding the location or extent of these "hazard footprints" for either existing or proposed liquid bulk facilities in the Port. As such, we respectfully suggest that the conclusion that such environmental impacts are less-than-significant is not adequately supported by evidence provided in the PEIR. 2. Section 5.0 of the PEIR discusses the program alternatives to the proposed PMPU. The PEIR notes that, although many key components of the program alternatives suggested by the Port Community Advisory Committee (PCAC) have been included in the PMPU, the PCAC recommendations related to liquid bulk storage facilities near the Wilmington community in the City of Los Angeles and on Terminal Island were rejected, respectively, as: • Not avoiding or reducing significant environmental impacts; and, • Being physically and financially infeasible. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes offers the following comments with respect to the rejection of the PCAC alternative (Section 5.1.4.1) in the PEIR: a. With respect to the PCAC recommendations regarding liquid bulk storage near Wilmington, the PEIR (Page 5-4, Lines 32-39) again relies upon the Port's RMP to ensure that there are no significant adverse impacts upon "vulnerable resources." However, as we noted in our Comment 1.b above, we are concerned that the lack of details and specifics about the "hazard footprints" of existing or proposed liquid bulk facilities in the Port does not offer sufficient evidence to support this conclusion in the PEIR. b. With respect to the PCAC recommendations regarding the relocation of liquid bulk storage to Terminal Island, the PEIR (Page 5-5, Lines 1-16) asserts that there is a lack of available berthing capacity and that the cost of such relocation would be economically infeasible. It is not clear if these C-146 Christopher Cannon 8 April 2013 Page 3 conclusions took into account the possible future expansion and development of the "Pier 500" project on Terminal Island, as described in the draft PMPU document. Would the berthing capacity for the relocation of liquid bulk facilities still be inadequate on Terminal Island with the addition of Pier 500? Would the relocation of such facilities to Pier 500 still be infeasible? Again, thank you very much for the opportunity to review and comment upon this important project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (310) 544-5226 or via e-mail at kitf@rpv.com «~ Senior Administrative Analyst cc: Mayor Susan Brooks and City Council Carolyn Lehr, City Manager Carolynn Petru, Deputy City Manager Border Issues file M:\Border lssues\LA Port Master Plan Update\20130408_POLA_DraftPEIRComments.docx C-147 Comments on the Los Angeles County Draft 2013 General Plan Housing Element C-148 CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE ADMINISTRATION 22 May 2013 County of Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning ATTN: Housing Section 320 W. Temple St., Rm. 1356 Los Angeles, CA 90012 VIA E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL SUBJECT Comments on the Los Angeles County Draft 2013 General Plan Housing Element To Whom It May Concern: The City of Rancho Palos Verdes appreciates the opportunity to comment upon the draft of the County's 2013 General Plan Housing Element. We respectfully offer the following comments for your consideration: 1) There are two (2) unincorporated County "islands" on or near the Palos Verdes Peninsula about which the City is concerned. The first is the Westfield Planning Area near the intersection of Palos Verdes Drive North and Crenshaw Boulevard, and the second is the La Rambla Planning Area in central San Pedro. Substantial, new residential development in either of these areas has the potential to adversely affect the semi-rural quality of life for residents in Rancho Palos Verdes and the other cities on the Peninsula, primarily as a result of increased density/intensity of development and additional traffic. 2) We understand that the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) assigned the County a total of 30, 145 dwelling units as its share of the regional obligation for new housing in the upcoming reporting period. Table 3.12 (p. 114) suggests that the County's RHNA obligation for above moderate-affordability units will be largely satisfied by the build-out of the Newhall Ranch, Marina del Rey and Northlake specific plan areas, while opportunities for the development of very low-, low-and moderate-affordability units will most likely occur on vacant and/or underutilized sites within other unincorporated areas of the County. 3) At this point, has the County "allocated" a specific number of RHNA-designated units to Westfield and/or La Rambla? We note that the lists and maps in 30940 HAWTHORNE BLVD. I RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90275-5391 I (310) 544-5205 /FAX (310) 544-5291 WWW.PALOSVEROES.COM/RPV PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER C-149 L.A. County Department of Regional Planning 22 May2013 Page2 Appendix 'A' show no vacant or underutilized sites in Westfield, but several of each in La Rambla. This being the case, we have the following concerns: a) Since there are no vacant or underutilized sites identified in Westfield, we presume that new second units on developed lots would be the main vehicle to provide additional housing in this planning area. Much of the Westfield area-like much of the Peninsula-is characterized by steep slopes, sensitive habitat areas and a lack of public sanitary sewers. We are concerned that these physical constraints may limit the ability of many properties in this area to support the development of second units without adverse impacts to surrounding properties and areas. b) Based upon the tables in Appendix 'A', the vacant and underutilized sites in La Rambla are proposed to be capable of supporting at least seventy- two (72) additional dwelling units. The County should be aware that major north-south access to and from La Rambla is provided by Western Avenue, which abuts the northwesterly corner of the planning area. Western Avenue serves as the boundary between Rancho Palos Verdes and San Pedro, and is also the location of a major commercial strip that serves both communities. Traffic on Western Avenue is already severely impacted during peak hours, and we are concerned that substantial new residential development in La Rambla-particularly higher-density development-will only serve to exacerbate this existing condition. Again, thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this important project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (310) 544-5226 or via e-mail at kitf@rpv.com. Sincerely, ~~ Senior Administrative Analyst cc: Mayor Brooks and City Council Carolyn Lehr, City Manager Carolynn Petru, Deputy City Manager Joel Rojas, Director of Community Development M:\Border lssues\LA County Housing Element Update\20130522_LACounty_HousingElementComments.docx C-150 RHE City Council Staff report regarding demolition of the gas-to-energy facility at the former Palos Verdes landfill C-151 AGENDA Staff Repo tMAv 142013 ITEM NO. 7 (3 City of Ro 11 in g Hi 11 s Es tefte~...;.,,;;.,;;;.:..::::::::::" , ... ;;.,J DATE: MAY 14, 2013 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DAVID WAHBA, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: SANITATION DISTRICTS GAS-TO-ENERGY FACILITY LOCATION: 25706 HAWTHORNE BLVD. At the last City Council meeting on April 23rd, the City Council directed staff to obtain additional information with respect to the Sanitation Districts project to remove the existing Gas-to-Energy Facility at 25706 Hawthorne Blvd. The Sanitation Districts staff, including their legal counsel, will be making a PowerPoint presentation of the Gas-to- Energy removal project. Note that this project had previously been presented to the City Council and was approved by the Sanitation Districts in 2007. The current Gas-to-Energy Facility collects methane gas from the Palos Verdes Landfill and converts it to electricity; however, since the methane from the site has decreased substantially in quality and quantity over the years, the facility has become obsolete and in recent years was being supplemented with natural gas. Other technologies were considered that could be used at the site, including but not limited to fuel cells, however, Sanitation Districts engineers determined that these alternatives are not feasible for a number of reasons. Therefore, the remaining gas extracted from the site will be flared into the atmosphere. Staff recommends the City Council receive and file this report. Attachments: 1. Lett'er from 3402 Tanglewood Lane, Rolling Hills Estates 2. Letter from 26842 Eastvale Road, Palos Verdes Peninsula P:DW:gas to energy cm C-152 3402 Tanglewood Lane, Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Tel: 310 541 7196 April 28, 2013 Dear Rolling Hills Estates City Council Members, ,--·---·--·· r ~'"'Jtt·-- [ ii APR J o 2013 ). ~ L. /_ .. ; ;· ' i t j' l ' ~ ! !. ! :· l ... ! We have recently been alerted to the fact that the LA County Sanitation District is about to start a one-year demolition project at the Palos Verdes Landfill to include the gas to energy center. In addition the project with be demolishing the site buildings that house the technician and engineer. We hope that you are not eliminating even more staff from the landfill. That is objectionable. This one-year project is quite different that the one 'advertised' in 2007 that was to take only 4 weeks. This 2013 one-year project is demolishing buildings by public trails and a gas system module at the recycle center where we use public roads. The demolition of the heavy equipment and foundations at the power plant will unearth landfill wastes and former mining site wastes. While we daily use the public trails and roads we need to be assured that every effort is taken to mitigate any dangerous problems created by demolition of the cement pads of the huge equipment at the gas center that could create dust and air pollution. What studies have been publicly available on this latest project? We have not been informed of this plan and it is quite disturbing. Additionally, with the heavy winds we have recently experienced it is alarming to anticipate toxic waste dust blowing towards our homes. The landfill property was annexed by Rolling Hills Estates to assure that the city concerns regarding the closed facility would be recognized. We are asking that the city council take the lead and ask the District to complete an EIR that would take the CA law regarding CEQA seriously. This is so very important to protect the entire community. We rely on you as our city leaders to protect us from any harm that may come from not following recommended studies. Yours truly, Frances & Helmut Harder C-153 26842, Eastvale Road, Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 902784 April 24, 2013 Rolling Hill Estate City Council 4045, Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Dear Sir /Madam, 1=---·· . 'I r ') • · ". i f ,.,,.,,I ~· ,.,f!.,_..,,...,.., • ' 1 !. · 1 APR 2 4 2013 . i •I ,, 1 ; L .• _. We have carefully studied the specification of the works to be done on the landfill and we need to object in the strongest terms their execution. The area in question is a Class 1 site -most toxic and to leave the work to a contractor is most irresponsible. It is unexplainable how dangerous work of this kind can be executed as planned as we know in today's times the danger of unhealthy air. A more detailed study needs to be undertaken and precise details to be reviled and explained to the entire neighborhood. We expect this project to be postponed until all aspect of the situation is fully tested to the full agreement of all concerned. Should a postponement and further proposals on a safe undertaking of the project not take place, higher authority needs to be involved. As the health of the close residents needs to be safeguarded as well as the property prices not influenced by such a project which in our opinion was not sufficiently examined. Please confirm the receipt of this letter. Sincerely, Anne and George Schmid C-154 PV News articles and "Letter to the Editor" regarding demolition of the gas-to-energy facility at the former Palos Verdes landfill C-155 LACSD set to demolish gas-to-energy facility at Palos Verdes Landfill -Palos Verdes Pe... Page 1 of 4 LACSD set to demolish gas-to-energy facility at Palos Verdes Landfill By Mary Scott, Peninsula News I Posted: Thursday, May 9, 2013 9:42 am The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts will embark on a lengthy demolition project of the Palos Verdes Landfill gas-to-energy facility this summer, and some residents who say the LACSD failed to give public notice about the project are not happy. Concerns include safety, choice of contractor, length of project and whether the current project falls under an environmental impact review done for a proposed construction and demolition project proposed in 2007 -a project that did not come to fruition. "The 2007 project, to install a flare, eight micro turbines and one fuel cell, that never happened," said resident Joan Davidson. "They installed one new huge flare. They are now going to demolish, rip out if you will, the entire gas-to-energy center, which is quite huge." The demolition project, which will begin sometime between June and August and will last approximately 330 working days, includes the dismantling of the 12 MW power plant, cooling tower and two field office trailers. An existing 18-inch storm drain will be abandoned and a new 21-inch storm drain, which is approximately 180 feet in length, will be constructed. The project also includes the installation of new electric utility equipment that includes a 480 V substation and 800 kW stationary standby generator, renovation of the existing control room, placement of approximately 350 square yards of asphalt concrete, and potentially collection and transportation of contaminated water. The initial demolition project of the old gas-to-energy facility in 2007 was to be done for the construction of a new renewable energy facility. This project is "significantly different" than that proposed in 2007, and therefore should require a new environmental study, Davidson told the Rolling Hills Estates City Council. Davidson pointed out during an April 23 meeting that the 2007 project did not include a new storm drain, paving, a geology report explaining what soil contamination contractors may be exposed to, demolition of the office trailers, asbestos (in the office trailer ceiling tiles) or the collection of contaminated water. "In 2007 there were one or two sentences mentioning a general demolition but they never outlined for the public any details, blueprints, any information," Davidson said. "This power plant project would demolish the generators, the boilers, the cooling towers, the gas blowers, where public uses the trails and roads, where children play, where children run with their dogs, and people jog." http://www.pvnews.com/news/article_ldf279ee-b8c7-1 le2-b8cf-0019bb2963f4.html?mode... 5/9/2013 C-156 LACSD set to demolish gas-to-energy facility at Palos Verdes Landfill -Palos Verdes Pe... Page 2 of 4 Kristen Ruffell, section head of water quality at LACSD, told the News that the impacts of the demolition were fully addressed in the 2007 Mitigated Negative Declaration, and that the California Environmental Quality Act analysis is still applicable. "The CEQA documentation for that project is included in the 2007 mitigated negative declaration," Ruffell said. "That talked about not only installing the new flare but also removing the gas-to-energy facility." Ruffell further told the News that the LACSD's original conditional use permit in 1985 stated that upon closure or abandonment of any of the facilities, the LAC SD was required to remove them. In 2007, LAC SD announced that the PV Landfill gas-to-energy facility was near the end of its useful life as an energy producer. The landfill, which closed in December 1980, had been used as a gas-to-energy facility since 1974. By 2007, the LACSD said the levels oflandfill gases were too low to convert to energy. "The Sanitation Districts had proposed in 2007 to replace the facility with other equipment that could run on lower methane gas levels," Ruffell said. She added that the proposed project was held up partially by community members and partially because of issues separate from the project, "such that it was no longer viable." The LACSD settled on the installation of a new flare, leaving the old gas-to-energy facility in place. On Oct. 24, 2011, after the completion of the new flare, LACSD staff was asked by the landfill's Citizen's Advisory Committee ifthe old facility would be demolished. LACSD staff did inform the CAC, according to the minutes from the Oct. 24, 2011, CAC meeting, that the demolition project would move forward in spring 2013. Construction crews will renovate the control room, which will remain along with the new flare and the old flares (used as back-up flares), but the two field office trailers will be removed. Residents wonder whether this means staffing at the facility will be further reduced. Currently the landfill is staffed during the weekdays. At night and on weekends, there is no LACSD staff on hand. There is an emergency phone number that rings into the Whittier office -about 30 miles away. Safety "There is no one on the site anymore monitoring the landfill," resident Christine Zimmerman said. "Several years ago, we had the fire department and the captain working on this project to have an emergency preparedness plan, because there are 25 different things on this site that can create an atmospheric explosive hazards. "[Crews] need to be aware of it so they can protect themselves," she continued, "so they can protect the community. This is not a benign site." http://www.pvnews.com/news/article _ 1 df279ee-b8c7-1le2-b8cf-OO19bb2963f4.html?mode... 51912013 C-157 LAC SD set to demolish gas-to-energy facility at Palos Verdes Landfill -Palos Verdes Pe... Page 3 of 4 Zimmerman implored the City Council to talk to the LACSD about a new environmental study. "This site requires care because of the contaminants that are buried just a few feet under the surface -3, 5 feet below the surface -and it is surrounded by schools, particularly the most vulnerable children -preschool kids," she said. The gas-to-energy facility is built on the main site of the landfill, which accepted hazardous waste, including waste from nearby oil refineries, solvents and chemicals. The waste was dumped on top of an old diatomaceous earth mine. Diatomaceous earth is a sedimentary rock that easily crumbles into a white powder. Miners who inhaled the powder were at risk for silicosis, a lung disease. "Interesting enough, the districts likes to talk about having Class 1 and Class 2 waste buried there, but they always have a caveat that says as waste was defined at that time (when the landfill was in use)," Dav;idson said. "This is the year 2013. By the 1980s, anything that was buried in that landfill that was considered Class 2 became Class 1. It is a dangerous site. If it's kept underground, it's fine. The moment we start digging trenches, I get nervous. And they're going to be doing a lot of digging." Part of the project is the construction of a new storin drain. According to Ruffell, there is a storm drain underneath the control room that is damaged. Because of this, the catch basin on Hawthorne Boulevard doesn't take as much flow off the street as it should. "This project will reconnect that catch basin to the box storm drain that runs through the site .... It is an excavation, an open trench," Ruffell said. "It is not through any refuse or groundwater- bearing materials. It's a shallow trench. And that work is covered under the CEQA documentation." Any water encountered or any liquid created by the contractor is to be managed by the contractor. "It is not anticipated that the contractor will encounter groundwater or landfill-related liquids," Ruffell said. "In any case, the contractor is not allowed to discharge any wastes to the storm drain." Contractor The LACSD board of directors awarded the demolition project to Mehta Mechanical Co. Inc. on March 27. While Mehta Mechanical does hold a current, valid contractor's license with the state Contractors Board, what concerns Davidson is that Mehta was prohibited from bidding on, accepting or working on public works projects -as either a contractor or subcontractor -by the state Department of Industrial Relations for a period of three years. http://www.pvnews.com/news/article _1 df279ee-b8c7-11e2-b8cf-0019bb2963f4.html?mode... 51912013 C-158 LACSD set to demolish gas-to-energy facility at Palos Verdes Landfill -Palos Verdes Pe... Page 4 of 4 According to the department's documents, Mehta was debarred from 2002 to 2005 for failing to pay employees prevailing wages during a pipe replacement project for the city of Los Angeles. Mehta executives, according to hearing papers, took approximately $113,000 from workmen's wages for "personal use" and falsified certified payroll records. Further, Mehta Mechanical appeared before the California Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board in 2008 and 2011 for alleged health and safety violations. The News has not been able to confirm the alleged violations or the outcome of the Appeals Board. The contractor, according to the LACSD, is required to submit acceptable bonds and proof of insurance, including workers compensation insurance. The contractor is required to pay prevailing wages. The LACSD have the ability to audit the contractor to ensure that requirements are being met. "Allegations of OSHA violations are not legally sufficient to prevent contractors from bidding on or receiving public contracts; however, the Sanitation Districts will have inspectors on site at all times the contractor is working to monitor the contractor's work and ensure compliance with the contract documents," Ruffell said. Still, "I don't have any level of confidence in this project," Davidson said. mscott@pvnews.com @PVNewsEditor on Twitter http://www.pvnews.com/news/article_ldf279ee-b8c7-1 le2-b8cf-0019bb2963f4.html?mode... 5/9/2013 C-159 Council addresses power plant demolition with LACSD -Palos Verdes Peninsula News : ... Page 1 of 3 Council addresses power plant demolition with LAC SD By Mary Scott, Peninsula News I Posted: Friday, May 17, 2013 10:41 am RHB -Representatives from the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts appeared before the Rolling Hills Estates City Council on Tuesday to discuss concerns raised by residents regarding LACSD's demolition of the gas-to-energy facility at the Palos Verdes Landfill. Resident Joan Davidson brought the project to the council's attention during a recent meeting. The project, awarded to Mehta Mechanical Co. Inc. on March 27, includes the dismantling of the 12 MW power plant, cooling tower and two field office trailers, the construction of a 180-foot- long storm drain, the installation of new electric utility equipment that includes a 480 V substation and 800 kW stationary standby generator, renovation of the existing control room and placement of approximately 350 square yards of asphalt concrete. According to the project description, the contractor will need equipment to collect and transport any contaminated water that is created or exposed during the course of the work. Residents' concerns include safety, choice of contractor, and length of the project and whether it falls under a Mitigated Negative Declaration done for a project proposed in 2007 that included the construction of a new energy facility that could operate with the landfill' s lower methane levels. LACSD representatives maintain that the project is addressed in the 2007 Mitigated Negative Declaration and, according to the California Environmental Quality Act, the declaration is still applicable to this project. Residents dispute this and continue to ask the Sanitation Districts for an updated environmental review. Davidson said that based on her research into CEQA, if a substantial time has passed from the MND to the beginning of the project, there can be another evaluation. "I think this certainly calls for a re-evaluation of this project," she said. "I see significant differences." Many of the differences and concerns were re-addressed at Tuesday night's meeting, though no agreement to re-evaluate the project was made. The project has already been awarded and is set to begin sometime between June and August. Some of the major concerns the council specifically asked LACSD representatives to address were asbestos, oversight of the project and the evaluation of the soil at the excavation site of the new storm drain. http://www.pvnews.com/news/council-addresses-power-plant-demolition-with-lacsd/articl... 5/23/2013 C-160 Council addresses power plant demolition with LAC SD -Palos Verdes Peninsula News : ... Page 2 of 3 As part of the demolition, LACSD has identified the presence of asbestos in the floor tile (not the ceiling tile, as was initially reported last week in the News) in the two trailers to be removed but not in any of the power plant components. There is concern about whether there could be asbestos present in the other equipment. "As for asbestos sampling, did you sample all of the equipment throughout the area, or just the trailers -the towers, the boilers, the control room?" asked Councilman Steve Zuckerman. Kristen Ruffell, section head of water quality at LACSD, responded that she had not seen the sampling program; "however, we would have followed a normal environmental investigation that would have involved all of the equipment that would have asbestos in it," she added. By the time the power plant was built in the 1980s, the use of asbestos was being phased out, said Robert Ferrante, of the Sanitation Districts. Still asbestos reporting is done annually at the site. Davidson commented that she's seen the data, and "has no confidence" in it. The longtime Peninsula resident also said she has no trust in their contractor's ability to handle potentially contaminated soil and water during excavation for the storm drain. "The contractor is given huge responsibilities," she said. For instance, if he encounters water, how is going to dispose of the water? If it's contaminated, it can't go down the storm drain. LACSD maintains that the contractor will not encounter water while digging the 7-foot-deep trench. The groundwater is farther down at 100 feet below the surface. The storm drain, which is the most-questioned part of the entire project, is part of a maintenance project the Sanitation Districts combined with the demolition -but they say it is addressed in the 2007 MND. Crews will dig a 7-foot trench, 180 feet in length, to install a new 21-inch diameter pipe that will reconnect a catch basin on Hawthorne Boulevard to the landfill' s storm drain system. This new storm drain is to replace a damaged pipe underneath the control room and keep water from running on to the street. LACSD representatives maintain the ground to be excavated for the project is native soil and contains no refuse. But in a study done in the late 1980s by Dale Hinkle for LACSD, Hinkle determined that the power plant was not built on native soil but on compacted fill. Councilman Steve Zuckerman asked multiple times why the soil couldn't be tested before excavation. "It was initially described as native soil, now we're hearing it's compacted fill .... No one knows where it came from," he said. http://www.pvnews.com/news/council-addresses-power-plant-demolition-with-lacsd/articl... 512312013 C-161 Council addresses power plant demolition with LACSD -Palos Verdes Peninsula News : ... Page 3 of 3 The Sanitation Districts doesn't see soil testing beforehand as necessary. LACSD feels there is sufficient data gathered over the years suggesting there is no soil contamination in this area. Representatives in turn asked, why test before excavation? "Because when you take it out while you're putting the trench in, it's exposed. There is wind. There is fugitive dust," Zuckerman said. "And so the reason why is to create, like you said [earlier], absolute reassurance." Who is doing the project is as much of a concern as the project itself. Mehta Mechanical holds a current, valid contractor's license with the state Contractors Board, but Mehta was prohibited from bidding on, accepting or working on public works projects -as either a contractor or subcontractor -by the state Department of Industrial Relations between 2002 and 2005 for failing to pay its employees prevailing wages during a pipe replacement project for the city of Los Angeles. Mehta executives, according to hearing papers, took approximately $113,000 from employees' wages for "personal use" and falsified certified payroll records. Mehta also appeared before the California Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board in 2008 and 2011 for alleged health and safety violations. LACSD representatives maintained that Mehta has met the requirements to bid and work on public works projects, and assured the council that work will be monitored. mscott@pvnews.com @PVNewsEditor on Twitter http://www.pvnews.com/news/council-addresses-power-plant-demolition-with-lacsd/articl... 5/23/2013 C-162 Environmental impact of landfill -Palos Verdes Peninsula News: Opinion Page 1 of 1 Environmental impact of landfill LETTERS TO THE EDITOR I Posted: Thursday, May 23, 2013 7:00 am The use of the California Environmental Quality Act by special interest groups to demand full environmental impact reports in place of the simpler Negative Declaration reports has either delayed or killed beneficial projects at great additional expense. Assuredly, the issues raised by concerned citizens should be addressed. Hopefully, the outcome is in the best interest of the overall public, especially when the projects would be beneficial to the local area as well as the economy. However, it often seems as if no answer is ever good enough for some who claim to represent our best interests. We have seen this happen here when the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) was discouraged from upgrading the gas-to-energy generation project at the former dump site a couple of years ago by installing micro turbines and a fuel cell to generate power. Now they are being obstructed in their attempts to demolish the idled steam turbine plant. Last year I conducted a side-by-side source test of a similar micro turbine generator and a flare in cooperation with the California Air Resources Board at a different site not associated with LACSD. Our objective was to assess the environmental benefits of generating power from stranded waste gas that would have otherwise been flared. The results demonstrated that the flare burned cleaner than had been expected, the generator was exceptionally clean, there was a reduction in in both criteria pollutants (such as CO, NOX, SOX) and greenhouse gas pollutants, and there was a net economic benefit for the plant operator, the utility and the end user. Sadly, after spending millions of dollars in hearings, studies and reviews, the Sanitation Districts abandoned the gas-to-energy project improvement as uneconomic and is using the flare to burn the waste gas coming from the former dump site. Now we know that what we could have gotten instead was beneficial use of a stranded waste gas resource by generating electrical power, lower criteria and greenhouse gas emissions and an income stream to reduce our sanitation district assessments. Chris Hall, Palos Verdes Estates http://www.pvnews.com/ opinion/environmental-impact-of-landfill/article_ 22fc4228-c329-... 5/23/2013 C-163