RPVCCA_CC_SR_2014_06_17_I_Five_Year_CIPCITY OF
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMB
FROM: DENNIS McLEAN, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE &
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
DATE: JUNE 17, 2014
SUBJECT: 2014 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
REVIEWED: CAROLYNN PETRU, ACTING CITY MANAGE~
Project Manager: Kathryn Downs, Deputy Director of Finance & Information
Technology
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the 2014 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The CIP is a guide for the efficient and effective provision of resources for improving
and maintaining public infrastructure and facilities. The CIP is segregated into both
Funded and Unfunded projects and includes detailed "project sheets" that provide a
project description, project type (e.g. Roadway Infrastructure), location, department
responsible, estimates of cost, and the justification (e.g. safety, City Council goal,
outside funding available). The CIP document does not include any projects with
estimated costs below the infrastructure capitalization threshold of $100,000.
Although the CIP document presents project funding for five years, the City Council
approves CIP projects for the upcoming fiscal year only. This gives the City Council the
ability to shift priorities when needed, while at the same time identify future projects and
potential funding mechanisms.
Projects are generally added to the "Funded" list as available funding sources are
identified. Projects are usually funded first from restricted funds, to be conservative in
allocating General Fund monies only when necessary. Staff recommends planning for
use of the CIP Reserve (funded with General Fund money equivalent to transient
I-1
2014 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 17, 2014
Page 2 of 3
occupancy tax revenue and prior year favorable General Fund expenditure variance in
accordance with City Council Policy No. 41 -Reserve Policies).
On May 13, 2014, the Planning Commission reviewed the CIP Document and adopted
P.C. Resolution 2014-15, finding it to be consistent with the General Plan.
Per City Council direction on June 3, 2014, the following cha·nges have been made to
the 2014 CIP:
• The Landslide Early Warning System (estimated cost of $300,000) was moved to
the Unfunded List;
• The estimated cost for improvements to the lower portion of Hesse Park was
decreased to $500,000 on the Funded List (year 1) and included in the FY14-15
budget;
• Two additional dewatering wells were added to the Funded List (year 1) and the
proposed FY14-15 budget, resulting in a total budget appropriation of $360,00 in
FY14-15; and
• Civic Center Air Conditioning (placeholder estimate of $120,000) was added to
the Funded List (year 1) and the proposed FY14-15 budget.
The CIP list of "funded" projects (totaling $49.1 million) has been integrated into the
2014 Five-Year Financial Model. Projects listed in Year 1 of the CIP (totaling $10.5
million) have been included in the proposed FY14-15 budget, which is also on the June
17, 2014 agenda for City Council consideration.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Programming capital facilities and improvements over time can promote better use of
the City's limited financial resources, reduce costs and assist in the coordination of
public and private development. Based on guidelines of the framework and those set
forth by the City Council, Staff developed an inventory of capital projects. This inventory
was compiled through a comprehensive review of existing reports, infrastructure plans,
community input and the City Council's direction, goals and priorities. Some of these
plans include the following: the Pavement Management System, Vision Plan, Sanitary
Sewer Master Plan, Public Use Master Plan, Trails Network Plan, Storm Drain Master
Plan and the General Plan.
Staff evaluated every project quantified during the establishment and update of the CIP
and established Criteria justifications that are reflected on each project sheet. These
justification categories include: safety, support of essential City services, support of
Council plan goals, economy and efficiency, outside funding, and community
quality/sustainability. The Criteria justifications and the availability of restricted (non-
General Fund) monies, are utilized to establish the priority level of CIP projects. Staff
has included columns on the Funded and Unfunded lists (pages 11 & 68 of the
I-2
2014 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 17, 2014
Page 3 of 3
document) to indicate whether the project supports public safety or another City Council
priority.
Expected Additions to Future CIP Documents
Staff expects that there are at least two factors that will drive the addition of projects to
the CIP.
1. Additional storm drain projects will likely be identified when the Storm Drain
Master Plan is completed towards the end of 2014.
2. Additional water quality projects will likely be identified when the Regional Water
Quality Board adopts a plan document towards the end of 2015.
Attachment:
2014 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
I-3
2014 Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan
I-4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
FUNDED PROJECTS 10
FIVE YEAR CIP FUNDED LIST 11
BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 12
INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY 22
ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE 24
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING 38
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 40
LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS 47
STORM WATER QUALITY 49
SEWER PROJECTS 52
RECREATION, PARKS & OPEN SPACE 57
UNFUNDED PROJECTS 67
UNFUNDED LIST 68
BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 69
INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY 73
ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE 75
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING 83
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 87
LANDSLIDE MITIGATION 92
RECREATION, PARKS & OPEN SPACE 94
I-5
INTRODUCTION
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a guide toward the efficient and effective provision of public
infrastructure and facilities. Programming capital facilities and improvements over time can
promote better use of the City’s limited financial resources, reduce costs and assist in the
coordination of public and private development. In addition, the planning process is valuable as a
means of coordinating and taking advantage of joint planning and development of facilities and
infrastructure where possible. Careful management of these assets keeps the City poised for
flexible and responsive strategic planning that allows the City to proactively prepare the groundwork
for capital projects so when funding opportunities arise, a plan is ready to be implemented. By
looking beyond year-to-year budgeting and projecting what, where, when and how capital
investments should be made, capital planning enables public organizations to maintain an effective
level of service for the present and future population.
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP)
The result of this continuing planning process is the CIP, which is the City’s five-year plan for
infrastructure projects. The CIP addresses the City’s needs relating to the acquisition, expansion,
and rehabilitation of long-lived facilities and infrastructure. The CIP serves as a planning instrument
in conjunction with the City’s General Plan and the City Council’s Goals to identify needed capital
projects and coordinate the financing and timing of improvements in a way that maximizes the
return to the public. It provides a planned systematic approach to utilizing the City’s limited financial
resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service and infrastructure needs.
It serves as the “blueprint” for the future of the community and is a management and planning tool,
rather than a binding document.
The underlying strategy of the CIP is to plan for necessary land acquisition, construction and
maintenance of public facilities necessary for the safe and efficient provision of public services in
accordance with City policies and objectives adopted in the City’s General Plan. A critical element
of a balanced CIP is the provision of funds to both preserve or enhance existing facilities and
provide new assets to respond to changing needs and community growth. While the program
serves as a long range plan, it is reviewed and revised annually in conjunction with the budget.
Priorities may be changed due to funding opportunities or circumstances that propel a project to a
higher importance. Along the way, projects may be revised for significant costing variances.
The CIP is primarily a document that assists in addressing the City’s long-term needs. As such,
the projects and their scopes are subject to change from year to year as the needs of the community
become more defined and projects move closer to final implementation. The adoption of the CIP
is neither a commitment to a particular project nor a limitation to a particular cost. As a basic tool
for scheduling anticipated capital projects, it is also a key element in controlling future capital
financing. For this reason, the CIP includes some “unfunded” projects in which needs have been
qualified, but specific solutions and funding sources have not been determined.
When adopted, the CIP provides the framework for the City’s management team and the City
Council with respect to investment planning, project planning and the managing of any debt. This
document is independent of the City Council’s goals and is intended to serve as a mid-term planning
document.
THE CIP PROCESS
The capital improvement plan and budget is the result of an ongoing infrastructure planning
process. Infrastructure planning decisions must be made with regard to both existing and new
facilities and equipment. For existing facilities, the planning process addresses appropriate capital
renewal strategies and repair-versus-replacement of facilities. New service demands are also
considered since they often affect capital facility requirements. Planning for the five-year CIP
period and subsequent years, includes linking the General Plan to the capital plan requirements,
conducting needs assessments and allowing for flexibility to take advantage of opportunities for
I-6
capital investment. The FY14-15 through FY18-19 CIP is developed through input from
professional staff, citizens of Rancho Palos Verdes, and elected or appointed City officials.
CIP REVIEW TEAM
A CIP Review team is responsible for annually reviewing capital project requests and providing
recommendations to the City Manager. This team is comprised of staff from the Office of the City
Manager, Finance, Public Works, Community Development, and Recreation and Parks
departments, and the City Attorney. This team conducts an in-depth analysis of the impact of the
CIP on present and future cash flows and financial obligations, as well as the City’s ability to
finance, process, design, and ultimately maintain projects. The team will also analyze the fiscal
impact for each individual project; including future maintenance and replacement costs, associated
monetary benefits (e.g. future maintenance savings), as well as any applicable future revenue
opportunities. The team meets periodically throughout the year to evaluate the progress of
projects, and examine future needs of the City.
The overall goal of the CIP Review Team is to develop CIP recommendations that:
Preserve the past by investing in the continued upgrade of City assets and infrastructure;
Protect the present with improvements to City facilities and infrastructure;
Plan for the future.
Projects are identified by staff, professional consultants, residents and/or elected officials. There
are typically more proposals than can be funded in the five-year CIP period, so the team conducts
an internal project ranking process. The criteria used in this internal ranking includes, but is not
limited to, safety, support of essential City services, support of City Council’s goals, economy and
efficiency, outside funding committed (or eligible for), and community quality/sustainability.
Projects are prioritized based on the criteria outlined in this plan in the following section. If a project
receives a lower ranking, it just means that other projects in that period of time are more critical for
the City to address. While ratings are important in determining recommended projects, the realities
of the City’s financial situation are critical to all decisions.
CIP CRITERIA
Safety: Enhance or improve the overall safety of the City and delivery of services. Protect the
health and welfare of residents.
Supports Essential City Services: Maintenance and development of existing or new facilities and
infrastructure which allows the City to deliver essential services to residents of Rancho Palos
Verdes.
Supports City Council Goals: Supports the goals annually established by the City Council in the
CITY COUNCIL. Meets citywide long-term goals and is in compliance with the City’s General Plan.
Economy and Efficiency: Maintain and enhance the economy and efficiency of providing services
in Rancho Palos Verdes. This criterion would include projects which improve business processes
and overall efficiency while also evaluating environmental impacts.
Outside Funding Committed or Eligible: Support a project which outside funding has been
committed to or may be obtained through restricted revenue sources.
Community Quality/Sustainability: Maintain and enhance the infrastructure and services which
supports our residential and business community. This criterion would include projects which
preserve and enhance the overall quality of life in Rancho Palos Verdes and projects which ensure
economic viability to support a the community.
I-7
THE CIP CALENDAR
August-October Departments prepare CIP requests
November- January CIP Team reviews requests
February-May Recommendations developed to be included in the Five-Year
Model and Draft Budget
May-June Planning Commission Review
May-June Recommendations presented to the City Council for approval
Additional forms and methods of public outreach will be conducted as directed by the City
Council.
PROJECT LISTS
The CIP includes a comprehensive listing of all projects contained in the Five-Year Plan and also
projects beyond the five-year period. Detailed project sheets are contained in the plan for all
projects included in the CIP. Another list of unfunded projects is also contained in the plan to
highlight quantified projects beyond the five-year period. Projects which are included in the CIP
were evaluated based on the criteria approved by the City Council and are in compliance with the
goals set forth in the City’s General Plan. Application of these criteria ensures that each project
recommended for Council consideration does indeed support the policy objectives of the City’s
long-term planning documents and identifies a basis for scheduling and allocation of resources.
Cost estimates have been developed for each project based on preliminary project descriptions,
and include all estimated costs for land acquisition, permits and inspections, project management
and project engineering, consultant design, construction, utilities, information technology
infrastructure and other associated project fees. Estimates are in today’s dollars.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT POLICIES
Time Period
The Finance Department, in cooperation with all other City Departments and the City Attorney,
shall produce a working document designed to identify capital needs annually in conjunction with
the budget process. This Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is submitted to the City Council
to utilize in reviewing and prioritizing capital projects. After adoption by Council during the budget
process, the CIP becomes the City’s plan for capital improvements for the next five years, adjusted
annually.
Type of Project
Definitions
Capital asset: An asset with a cost in excess of $5,000 and an expected useful life of more than
one year, such as automobiles, equipment, and furniture. These items will continue to be included
in the operating budget. Items such as automobiles, minor equipment, and furniture will continue
to be accounted for and funded using the Equipment Replacement Fund and are not included in
the capital improvement plan.
Capital project: A project expected to have a useful life greater than ten years and an estimated
cost of $100,000 or more. Capital projects include the construction, acquisition, or major renovation
of buildings, roadways, utility systems, or other structures, purchase of land, and major landscaping
projects.
I-8
Projects meeting the above definition will be included in the CIP document in addition to the City’s
budget document. The information will be tied to the capital budget and totals for each project in
the CIP will be included in the capital budget.
Selecting the Projects for the CIP
The comprehensive capital project planning process has the following essential components:
The General Plan (Long-term Plan - 10 Years)
The Capital Improvement Plan (Mid-term Plan - 5 Years)
The Capital Budget (Short-term Plan - 1 Year)
City Council Goals (Long-term and Short-term evaluated each year)
All projects selected for the CIP should be consistent with the goals identified by the City Council
or as outlined in the City’s General Plan. The project selection process strives to achieve a
balanced plan for the community to include all necessary and high priority projects, while also
enhancing City services and facilities.
Operating Budget Impact Identified in the CIP
The operating impact of proposed capital projects, including personnel, operating expenditures,
capital outlay, and debt service, as applicable, will be identified in the CIP document and considered
in preparing the annual operating budget and Five-Year Financial Model.
Moving Projects from the CIP to the Capital Budget
All projects approved in the annual capital budget are appropriated at the estimated cost to
complete the project. At the end of each fiscal year, the remaining appropriation for uncompleted
portions of the project will be carried forward to subsequent fiscal years.
Staff will identify the estimated costs, potential funding sources, operating impact, and project
schedule for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to the City Council.
Staff will coordinate development of the capital improvement budget with the development of the
operating budget. All costs for internal professional services needed to implement the CIP will be
included in the capital budget as part of the budget document for the years the CIP is to be
implemented.
Cost tracking for components of the capital improvement program will be updated semi-annually to
ensure project completion against budget and established time lines.
Funding of the CIP Reserve Fund
City Council Policy No. 41 regarding the City’s Reserves provides for a minimum CIP Reserve level
of $3,000,000 for emergency projects, the transfer of the total annual Transient Occupancy Tax
(TOT) revenue into the CIP Reserve, and the transfer of any prior year General Fund favorable
expenditure variance to the CIP Reserve. The TOT revenue for FY14-15 is estimated to be about
$4 million.
Definition of Capital Budget Year
A capital budget year runs concurrent to the operating budget fiscal year beginning July 1st and
ending June 30th.
Types of Financing
The nature and cost of the project generally determines the financing options as do projected
revenue resources. The following financing instruments could be used in the following preferred
order:
Outside funding that does not require repayment, including grants, federal, state and
county restricted funding (i.e. transportation funding), and donations;
I-9
Developer Fees;
City restricted revenue imposed by voters (i.e. environmental excise tax, storm drain user
fee);
Accumulated Fund Balances in Restricted Funds;
General Fund;
Debt secured by a Restricted Revenue Source; and
General Obligation Debt.
Remaining Balances
It is the City’s policy to apply restricted funding sources after a project is completed and final cost
is identified, or at the close of each fiscal year, whichever occurs first.
Evaluation of Capital Projects
Capital project and program reviews are to monitor existing project performance and to update the
Five-Year CIP. Each project must be actively managed and semi-annual reports on the physical
and fiscal status of each project should be made available to the City Council in conjunction with
the budget adoption and Mid-Year Financial Review.
Green Building Standards
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes requires the incorporation of green building principles and
practices into the design, construction, and operation of all City facilities, and to evaluate all land
purchases for future development on the basis of reducing environmental impacts whenever
feasible.
Standards for Maintenance
It is important to have standards in place for the various infrastructure systems throughout the City
to maintain this investment and be positioned to provide adequate services for the residents of
Rancho Palos Verdes. Staff will develop maintenance standards and schedules as appropriate.
Contingency Policy
The need for contingencies will be evaluated with each project and be included in the CIP on a
case-by-case basis.
Project Change Orders
Project change orders will be made in accordance with the policy stated in Section 02.44 of the
Municipal Code.
GENERAL PLAN GOALS
The goals stated below are included in the City’s General Plan which serves as the City’s long-term
strategic planning tool. All CIP projects should contribute to fulfilling one or more of the goals listed
below.
Natural Environment Element
It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect, and enhance its
natural resources, beauty, and open space for the benefit and enjoyment of its residents
and the residents of the entire region. Future development shall recognize the sensitivity
of the natural environmental and be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the
protection of it.
Socio/Cultural Element
The City shall strive to protect and preserve all significant archaeological, paleontological
and historical resources within the City.
I-10
Cultural Resources
The City shall strive to protect and preserve all significant archaeological, paleontological
and historical resources within the City.
Current Social, Service, and Cultural Organizations
Work toward a coordinated program to aid in matching the facility needs of the many and
diverse groups in the community with existing and future facility resources throughout the
City.
Social Services
Encourage programs for community involvement, participation, and action to minimize the
sense of isolation and powerlessness felt by many individuals in the community.
Encourage programs for recreation, social services, and cultural and educational
achievement.
Encourage a framework for interaction among the four cities of the peninsula and between
the peninsula and its surrounding communities to solve common problems.
Urban Environment Element
It is the goal of the City to carefully control and direct future growth towards making a
positive contribution to all elements of the community. Growth in Rancho Palos Verdes
should be a cautious, evolutionary process that follows a well-conceived set of general
guidelines which respond to both holding capacity limitations for the region and
environmental factors on the peninsula.
Activity Areas
It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to preserve and enhance the community's
quality living environment; to enhance the visual character and physical quality of existing
neighborhoods; and to encourage the development of housing in a manner which
adequately serves the needs of all present and future residents of the community.
The City shall discourage industrial and major commercial activities due to the terrain and
environmental characteristics of the City. Commercial development shall be carefully and
strictly controlled, and limited to consideration of convenience or neighborhood service
facilities.
The City shall encourage the development of institutional facilities to serve the political,
social, and cultural needs of its citizens.
The City shall endeavor to provide, develop, and maintain recreational facilities and
programs of various types to provide a variety of activities for persons of all age groups
and in all areas of the community.
Agricultural uses within the City shall be encouraged, since they are desirable for resource
management and open space.
Infrastructure
It shall be a goal of the City to ensure adequate public utilities and communications services
to all residents, while maintaining the quality of the environment.
It shall be a goal of the City to provide residents with a safe and efficient system of roads,
trails and paths.
It shall be a goal of the City to encourage the increased mobility of residents through the
development of an adequate public transportation system.
I-11
Safety
It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of life and property from both
natural and man-made hazards within the community.
It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of the public through effective law
enforcement and fire protection programs.
It shall be a goal of the City to develop and enforce health and sanitation, emergency
communications, and disaster preparedness programs to ensure the overall health and
safety of all residents.
It shall be a goal of the City to protect life and property and reduce adverse economic,
environmental, and social impacts resulting from any geologic activity.
Sensory Environment
It shall be the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes through proper land use planning
and regulations, to provide for a quiet and serene residential community with a minimum
of restriction on citizen activity.
Palos Verdes peninsula is graced with views and vistas of the surrounding Los Angeles
basin and coastal region. Because of its unique geographic form and coastal resources,
these views and vistas are a significant resource to residents and many visitors, as they
provide a rare means of experiencing the beauty of the peninsula and the Los Angeles
region. It is the responsibility of the City to preserve these views and vistas for the public
benefit and, where appropriate, the City should strive to enhance and restore these
resources, the visual character of the City, and provide and maintain access for the benefit
and enjoyment of the public.
Land Use Plan
It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to provide for land uses which will be
sensitive to and enhance the natural environment and character of the community, supply
appropriate facilities to serve residents and visitors, promote a range of housing types,
promote fiscal balance, and protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the
community.
Fiscal Element
It shall be a goal of the City to hold the property tax to a minimum and to continually explore
and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of alternate or new sources of revenue.
It shall be a goal of the City to explore cooperative financing strategies that might be
undertaken in association with other jurisdictions.
It shall be a goal of the City to take maximum advantage of regulatory legislation to obtain
contributions, dedications and reservations (i.e., easements).
It shall be a goal of the City to ascertain that all revenues generated by growth are sufficient
to cover costs related to growth.
It shall be a goal of the City to thoroughly evaluate capital acquisition and operating
expenditures and their impacts before implementation of programs.
I-12
FUNDED PROJECTS
The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs
through various planning processes along with a proposed funding source.
Because the City Council approves CIP projects for the upcoming year, proposed
future funding sources could change in subsequent years.
I-13
Rancho Palos Verdes Five Year Capital
Improvement Plan - Funded Projects Page
Safety
Goal
Council
Priority FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19
Identified Funding
Source
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
Citywide ADA Transition Plan Implementation 14 X 400,000$ 200,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ EET/CIP Reserve
RPV TV Building Improvements 15 X 110,000$ CIP Reserve
Fiber Optic Cabling - Hesse Park/Ryan Park 16 260,000$ CIP Reserve
Fiber Optic Cabling - Abalone Cove Sewer Lift
Stations/Shoreline Park/Ladera Linda 17 X 1,600,000$ CIP Reserve
Ladera Linda Community Center Improvements 18 X 4,000,000$ CIP Reserve
Solar Power System Hesse Park 19 385,000$
Energy Savings
Grant
Solar Power System PVIC 20 410,000$
Energy Savings
Grant
Civic Center Air Conditioning 21 X 120,000$ CIP Reserve
Intangible Capital Outlay
Pavement Management Program Update 23 X X 120,000$ CIP Reserve
Roadway Infrastructure
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 2 & 6 25 X X 3,000,000$ General Fund
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 7 26 X X 2,000,000$
General Fund, TDA
Article 3 funds
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 8 27 X X 2,000,000$
General Fund, TDA
Article 3 funds
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 3 & 4 28 X X 2,100,000$
General Fund, TDA
Article 3 funds
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 5 29 X X 2,100,000$
General Fund, TDA
Article 3 funds
Arterial Rehabilitation - Miraleste Drive 30 X X 2,500,000$
STPL, Measure R,
Prop A/C, CIP
Reserve
Arterial Rehabilitation - Crenshaw Boulevard 31 X X 200,000$ 2,600,000$
Measure R, Prop C,
CIP Reserve
Arterial Rehabilitation - Indian Peak Road 32 X X 1,800,000$
Measure R, Prop C,
CIP Reserve
Arterial Rehabilitation - Silver Spur Road 33 X X 1,800,000$
Measure R, Prop C,
CIP Reserve
Traffic Safety Improvements - PVDE at Bronco 34 X X 500,300$
HSIP 90%, CIP
Reserve 10%
PVDS Road Way Realignment and Drainage Project 35 X X 3,060,000$ CIP Reserve
Western Avenue Traffic Improvements 36 X X 3,200,000$
50/50 Inter-Agency
Cost-Share/CIP
Reserve
Hawthorne Blvd Corridor Beautification Study 37 X 150,000$ CIP Reserve
Utility Undergrounding
Crenshaw Boulevard Undergrounding 39 1,200,000$ Rule 20A funds
Storm Drain System
Storm Drain Lining 41 X X 335,278$ 340,836$ 347,653$ 350,000$ 350,000$
WQFP User Fees/CIP
Reserve
South Hawthorne/Via Frascati 42 X X 440,000$ WQFP User Fees
Altamira Canyon Drainage Project Study Report 43 X X 500,000$ CIP Reserve
Paintbrush Canyon Drainage Project Study Report 44 X X 120,000$ WQFP User Fees
PVDS Roadway Drainage Project at Sacred Cove 45 X X 450,000$
WQFP User Fees/CIP
Reserve
Storm Drain Line Point Repair Projects 46 X X 150,000$ 900,000$
WQFP User Fees/CIP
Reserve
Landslide Mitigation Projects
Landslide Dewatering Well Program 48 X X 360,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ CIP Reserve
Storm Water Quality Projects
Drainage Area Monitoring System 50 300,000$ CIP Reserve
Storm Water Quality Improvement Program 51 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ CIP Reserve
Sewer Projects
Capacity Project - Ginger Root Lane 53 X X 203,000$ CIP Reserve
Capacity Project - Malaga Canyon 54 X X 407,000$ CIP Reserve
Capacity Projects - Other Locations 55 X X $ 465,000 CIP Reserve
Abalone Cove Sewer District Rehabilitation 56 X X 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ CIP Reserve
Recreation, Parks, and Open Space
Lower Hesse Park Improvements (Phase 1)58 X 500,000$ CIP Reserve
Hesse Park Parking Lot Resurfacing 59 X 210,000$ CIP Reserve
Point Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC) Screening
Wall 60 110,000$ CIP Reserve
Sunnyside Trail Segment 61 X 465,000$ Grant/CIP Reserve
PVIC Exhibits 62 400,000$ Donations
PVIC Landscaping Improvements 63 400,000$ Donations
Gateway Park Trailhead & Parking Access
Improvements 64 X 200,000$ CIP Reserve
Abalone Cove Beach Access Road 65 X 100,000$ CIP Reserve
Grandview Park Improvements (Phase 1)66 X 635,000$ CIP Reserve
Totals 10,510,278$ 7,106,136$ 7,242,653$ 10,130,000$ 14,075,000$
I-14
BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Buildings and other facility improvements may include any proposed new City
facility or renovation or improvement of any existing City facilities. The City owns
and maintains the following public buildings:
City Hall Administration Building at Point Vicente Park
City Hall Community Development Building at Point Vicente Park
City Hall trailer leased by Palos Verdes on the Net at Point Vicente Park
City Hall Emergency Communications Center trailer at Point Vicente Park
Fred Hesse Jr. Community Center Building
Pointe Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC) at Lower Point Vicente Park
Robert Ryan Park Building
Ladera Linda Community Center Buildings (5)
RPV TV Studio Building
Buildings at Abalone Cove Shoreline Park, currently used for staffing, public
restrooms, and a nursery school on the beach.
Pelican Cove Restroom Building
Except for PVIC, these buildings are 25 years old or older and showing the signs
of daily use. Many of the facilities were purchased from the school district or
transferred to the City from the federal government, and little to no improvements
have been made since their acquisition. It is important to perform adequate
maintenance to extend the life of these facilities. It will be necessary to renovate
these buildings as they age to meet the needs of the community and ensure that
all building and safety guidelines are satisfied. PVIC, the most recently remodeled
City facility, was built in 1984 and expanded in 2005. The City Hall buildings and
Ladera Linda Community Center buildings are the best examples of buildings that
are in great need of renovation to meet organizational needs, comply with safety
and code requirements, and comply with all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
guidelines. The projects listed on the following pages have been developed based
on individual staff assessments, input from the community and professional
consultants’ assessments and studies.
In November 2010, the City’s consultants completed a Civic Center Facilities
Assessment, which offered alternatives and general cost estimates for building
improvements to serve municipal functions, as well as optional public amenities
with a view to the long-term needs of the City. The alternatives identified range
widely from a “no-frills” structural, HVAC and ADA retrofit to the existing
administration facility--to newly-constructed civic facilities which could incorporate
community-serving amenities (public meeting rooms, community center, etc.). In
light of competing CIP demands, the City Council has directed Staff to focus on
cost-effective renovation of existing City Hall buildings. Therefore, the full-
expansion, new construction alternative is not included in the Unfunded project list
within this document. The City Council ad-hoc subcommittee for the Point
Vicente/Civic Center Master Plan is working with Staff on a critical needs
I-15
assessment, including the seismic retrofit of City Hall buildings, improvements to
address ADA compliance throughout the campus, as well as heating, ventilation,
and air conditioning. Once those projects are fully considered by the Council, the
project description and associated costs will be incorporated in accordance with
Council’s direction into the CIP schedule.
I-16
PROJECT: CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Various
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
The Citywide ADA Transition Plan, adopted by the City Council on
June 4, 2013, identified total costs of $11.85 million for
implementation. The cost estimate included improvements to ADA
compliance at the Civic Center (buildings and grounds) totaling
$1.36 million, and those at Ladera Linda Park totaling $1.72 million.
Any future improvements at those sites are expected to bring the
facilities into ADA compliance. Additionally, the total cost of $11.85
million includes right-of-way improvements totaling $2.64 million,
including curb ramps and bus stops. Those improvements will be
addressed as part of each roadway rehabilitation project. The
remaining identified costs of $6.12 million will be addressed through
this annual implementation allocation.
Total project costs to remove barriers categorized as “potential
hazard” and “severe” was estimated to be about $800,000. Phase
1 of ADA Transition Plan (TP) implementation for those categories
was appropriated in FY13-14 for $400,000. The FY14-15
appropriation is for Phase 2 of TP implementation for the same
categories. The allocations in Years 2 through 5 are for other
improvements included in the $6.12 million cost estimate noted
above.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $40,000 $17,500 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
CONSTRUCTION $360,000 $182,500 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $400,000 $200,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Source: EET and CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-17
PROJECT: RPV TV BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Civic Center at Upper Point Vicente
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The HVAC system at the RPV TV Building is deteriorating and is
beyond repair. This system which is required for daily activities and
the cable television systems, is affixed to the ceiling of the storage
room. The new HVAC system will be relocated to the back of the
building (utility area), allowing the storage room to be converted to a
much needed waiting area for visitors. The new HVAC system will
have sufficient capacity to keep the server system at the required
temperature. The cable/server system which currently occupies an
office, will also be relocated to the utility area in the back of the
building allowing the office to be utilized for its original purpose.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $25,000
CONSTRUCTION $85,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $110,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION IN FY 14-15 BUDGET
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-18
PROJECT: FIBER OPTIC CABLING: HESSE/RYAN
PARK
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Hesse Park/Ryan Park
DEPARTMENT: Administration and Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the installation of fiber optic cabling for the
City’s phone and information network between City facilities within
the public right-of-way which will run adjacent to Ryan Park and
directly on to Hesse Park.
To reduce costs, this project will be strategically aligned with the
Hawthorne Traffic Signal Synchronization Project to take advantage
of the asphalt removed for the other project. Vaults will be placed
adjacent to the roadway within the public right-of-way.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $260,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $260,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The project design of $60,000 was appropriated in FY13-14.
I-19
PROJECT:
FIBER OPTIC CABLING: ABALONE
COVE SEWER LIFT STATIONS/
SHORELINE PARK/LADERA LINDA
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Ladera Linda/Abalone Cove Shoreline Park
DEPARTMENT: Administration and Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the installation of fiber optic cabling for unified
communications and data transmission between remote City park and
infrastructure facilities and the Civic Center administration facility. It
is essential to establish communications to Abalone Cove Shore Line
Park, the Abalone Cove Sewer Lift Stations and Ladera Linda
Park. Improved connectivity with Ladera Linda is essential to provide
full communication services to the eastside community park in
conjunction with its rehabilitation. The entire fiber optic run could
occur by a combination of aerial and underground line placement.
The project includes running a single line of fiber optic cabling on its
own network from City Hall to Abalone Cove Shoreline Park, Abalone
Cove Sewer lift stations and on to Ladera Linda Park, with the cost of
approximately $1.6M. The work would entail installing 24-48 strand
fiber in 3” conduit within the public right of way along Palos Verdes
Drive South by either open cut or boring construction methods.
Due to challenges with running fiber through the landslide area, the
option of leasing fiber from an Internet Service Provider between the
Civic Center and Ladera Linda will be included in the scope of the
project. Cox Communications currently has fiber that connects to
users along the road adjacent to Ladera Linda.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $1,600,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,600,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-20
PROJECT: LADERA LINDA PARK & COMMUNITY
CENTER BUILDINGS REPLACEMENT
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Ladera Linda Park
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The initial stage of this project, for which a budget has been
appropriated, is to create a master plan which will lay the
groundwork for the site’s long-term redevelopment and phased
implementation. This stage involves a study of community needs
through public outreach along with contemplating the City’s needs
for public service facilities. This work will be followed by
programming, quantifying the needs, planning and preparing a
feasibility report to create a master plan which can be phased for
design and construction.
The cost calculation for Ladera Linda Buildings Replacement
project is based on an estimated need for 12,000 square-feet of
buildings to replace the existing 18,000 square-feet. The
anticipated square footage could include park restrooms, a staff
building, multipurpose room, activity rooms, discovery room and a
Park Ranger/Deputy Sheriff drop-in office. Other improvements
include park grounds landscaping & irrigation, picnic tables,
benches and an emergency generator. The project can be divided
in three phases. The first phase will include Hazmat abatement,
removal of all buildings, installation of all utility infrastructures, the
construction of 6,000 SF of new building, park grounds, landscaping
& improvements. The second and third phase will include 3,000 SF
of new buildings each.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $4,000,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $4,000,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
Phase I - $4 million in CIP Reserves
Phase II - $1.6 million in CIP Reserves
Phase III - $1.6 million in CIP Reserves
Total Cost: $7.2 million
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-21
PROJECT: SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR HESSE
PARK BUILDING
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Hesse Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating
systems over the roof of Hesse Park to reduce power consumption
with occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid. This project
will help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce
considerable amounts of emissions. Typically the energy savings
can cover the cost of projects of this scale in an estimated period of
15 to 20 years.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $35,000
CONSTRUCTION $350,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $385,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: Fully funded with an Energy Savings grant (federal/state)
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Potential electricity savings is about $18,000 annually. The life of the system is expected to be 20-25
years. Solar system components are generally under warranty for 10-12 years.
I-22
PROJECT:
SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR POINT
VICENTE INTERPRETIVE CENTER
(PVIC)
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: PVIC
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating
systems over the roof of PVIC to reduce power consumption with
occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid. This project will
help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce
considerable amounts of emissions. Typically the energy savings
can cover the cost of projects of this scale in an estimated period of
15 to 20 years.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $35,000
CONSTRUCTION $375,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $410,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding: Fully funded with an Energy Savings grant (federal/state)
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Potential electricity savings is about $20,000 annually. The life of the system is expected to be 20-25
years. Solar system components are generally under warranty for 10-12 years.
I-23
PROJECT: CIVIC CENTER AIR CONDITIONING
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Civic Center
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
The project would include an assessment of various alternatives to
install air conditioning in Civic Center buildings. Building
temperatures during warm summer days contribute to reduced staff
productivity. Alternatives could include individual wall-mounted
units for each office, a split-area cooling system, or a central system
that would also address heating. Due to the aged electrical system
and the anticipated high power demand, the project may also
include electrical modifications to accommodate air conditioning.
The estimated project cost of $120,000 serves as a placeholder
appropriation, and does not include design costs. After alternatives
are vetted, estimated project costs may increase.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $120,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $120,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding: CIP Reserve
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-24
INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY
Intangible Capital Outlay improvements may not have significant physical
substance, but they have more than minimal value and help the City in improving
operations or planning for the future. Projects that could be classified as intangible
capital outlay include the update or development of major planning processes and
documents, significant software purchases that may improve the efficiency of
business processes or large technology purchases that may improve or enhance
service delivery to citizens.
I-25
PROJECT: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
(PMP) UPDATE
TYPE: Intangible Capital Outlay
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The PMP is updated every three years to evaluate the condition of the
City’s roadway system and to identify Citywide Arterial and
Residential Street Rehabilitation projects. The Metropolitan Transit
Authority (Metro) requires the PMP update in order for the City to
continue receiving Proposition C monies.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $120,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $120,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-26
ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE
Roadway infrastructure is one of the most widely used major capital investments
of a municipality. Without a well-maintained street system, the transportation
needs of the public, business, industry and government cannot be met. The roads
are also part of a critical public safety need, as they contribute to the general health
and welfare of the community. Maintaining quality roadway infrastructure is also
important for maintaining property values. It has been shown that property values
tend to suffer from adjacent poorly maintained streets. Roadway infrastructure
includes residential streets, arterial streets and traffic safety improvements. In the
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, there are 44.3 miles of arterial streets and 104.2
miles of residential streets. The total for all streets and alleys mileage is 148.5
centerline miles.
To manage the City’s residential and arterial streets, the City hires a consultant
that completes a full-detailed assessment of all streets every three years. This
report, known as the Pavement Management Program (PMP), helps to identify any
serious issues and provides the City with a rating for each street. The report
includes the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The City of Rancho Palos
Verdes maintains a minimum standard for PCI for a municipal street system at 80.
The City’s current PCI is 81.8 based upon the PMP report prepared by Bucknam
Infrastructure Group, Inc. in 2013. Since 1997 the City has maintained a pavement
rating between 80 and 90. The report also helps in defining a schedule to complete
the work. The City has been divided into nine zones for residential streets, but in
the case of some areas, zones may be completed together in one year for added
efficiency.
I-27
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zones 2 & 6
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s PMP, Zones 2 & 6 of the residential rehabilitation
program are scheduled for implementation during the FY14-15
budget cycle. This project will include slurry seal, overlay, curb repair,
root removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and
sidewalks in Zones 2 & 6. This infrastructure enhancement will also
include updating traffic signs, striping, curb painting, house
numbering and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $3,000,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $3,000,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY14-15. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered “Very Good Condition”.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 2: Residential streets in the northwestern part
of the City between Crest Road and Grayslake
Road, east and west of Hawthorne Blvd.
Zone 6: Residential streets in the southern part of
the City encompassing all neighborhoods to the east
of Point Vicente Park and west of Trump National
including Crestmont, Tramonto, Seaview,
Barkentine, and Seacove.
I-28
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zone 7
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s PMP, Zone 7 of the residential rehabilitation
program is scheduled for implementation during the FY15-16
budget cycle. This project will include micro-surfacing, slurry seal,
overlay, curb repair, root removals and ADA compliance updates
of the streets and sidewalks in Zone 7. This infrastructure
enhancement will also include updating traffic signs, striping, curb
painting, house numbering, and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $2,000,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,000,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY15-16. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered “Very Good Condition”.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 7: The Ladera Linda community, Ganado Area,
streets near Mira Catalina School, San Ramon and
Calle Aventura.
I-29
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zone 8
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s PMP, Zone 8 of the residential rehabilitation
program is scheduled for implementation during the FY16-17 budget
cycle. This project will include micro-surfacing, slurry seal, overlay,
curb repair, root removals and ADA compliance updates of the
streets and sidewalks in Zone 8. This infrastructure enhancement
will also include updating traffic signs, striping, curb painting, house
numbering, and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $2,000,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,000,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY16-17. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered “Very Good Condition”.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 8: Residential neighborhoods off of Palos
Verdes Drive East in the northern and eastern parts
of the City.
I-30
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zones 3 & 4
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s PMP, Zones 3 & 4 of the residential
rehabilitation program is scheduled for implementation during the
FY17-18 budget cycle. This project will include micro-surfacing,
slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root removals and ADA compliance
updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zones 3 & 4. This
infrastructure enhancement will also include updating traffic signs,
striping, curb painting, house numbering, and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $2,100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY17-18. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered “Very Good Condition”.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 3: Residential streets north of Silver Spur Rd
and east of Hawthorne Blvd, including the
Blackhorse community, Silver Arrow, Longhill and
Beechgate
Zone 4: Residential streets bordering Crenshaw
Blvd and Crest Road, including the Sea Crest, Sea
Breeze, Island View, and Ridgecrest communities
I-31
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zone 5
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s PMP, Zones 5 of the residential rehabilitation
program is scheduled for implementation during the FY18-19
budget cycle. This project will include micro-surfacing, slurry seal,
overlay, curb repair, root removals and ADA compliance updates of
the streets and sidewalks in Zones 5. This infrastructure
enhancement will also include updating traffic signs, striping, curb
painting, house numbering, and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $2,100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY18-19. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered “Very Good Condition”.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 5: Residential streets in the most western part
of the City, off Hawthorne and between Crest and
PVDW.
I-32
PROJECT:
ARTERIAL REHABILITATION –
MIRALESTE DRIVE
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Miraleste Drive
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s PMP, Miraleste Drive arterial will be resurfaced.
The project will include milling and overlay, roadway patching, crack
filling, curb and gutter repair, sidewalk repair and ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $2,500,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: STPL funding, Proposition C, Proposition A, Measure R and CIP Reserve
funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The project goal would result in a pavement condition of 86 or higher, which is considered “Very Good Condition”.
The project design of $70,000 was appropriated in FY13-14.
I-33
PROJECT: ARTERIAL REHABILITATION –
CRENSHAW BLVD
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd.
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s PMP, Crenshaw Blvd. arterial will be
resurfaced. The project will include milling and overlay, roadway
patching, crack filling, curb and gutter repair, sidewalk repair and
ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $200,000 $2,600,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $200,000 $2,600,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Proposition C, Measure R and CIP Reserves.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The project goal would result in a pavement condition of 86 or higher, which is considered “Very Good Condition”.
I-34
PROJECT: ARTERIAL REHABILITATION – INDIAN
PEAK ROAD
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Indian Peak Road
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s PMP, Indian Peak Road arterial will be
resurfaced. The project will include milling and overlay, roadway
patching, crack filling, curb and gutter repair, sidewalk repair and
ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $100,000
CONSTRUCTION $1,700,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,800,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Proposition C, CIP Reserve and Measure R funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The project goal would result in a pavement condition of 86 or higher, which is considered “Very Good Condition”
I-35
PROJECT:
ARTERIAL REHABILITATION –
SILVER SPUR ROAD (HAWTHORNE
BLVD TO DRYBANK RD)
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Silver Spur Road (Hawthorne Blvd to Drybank Rd)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Silver Spur Road will be resurfaced to mitigate roadway distress
and degradation that has occurred over the years. The project will
require milling and overlay, root removal, asphalt patching, curb and
gutter repair, sidewalk repair, ADA ramps and re-striping.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $100,000
CONSTRUCTION $1,700,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,800,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Federal STPL, Proposition C, Measure R, and CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The project goal would result in a pavement condition of 86 or higher, which is considered “Very Good Condition”
I-36
PROJECT:
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT
BRONCO DRIVE
TYPE: Traffic Improvements
LOCATION: PVDE at Bronco Drive
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve portions of PVDE to provide wider travel lanes in each
direction, a shared use equestrian and pedestrian path located
behind the existing guardrail, a high visibility equestrian crossing at
Bronco Drive complete with flashing beacons, augmented crossing
signage and advanced crossing signage with flashing beacons,
installation of safety barriers and railing to reduce vehicle collisions
and cross-over accidents
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $500,300
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $500,300
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Staff attained an HSIP grant that requires a 10% local match from CIP Reserve. The total project cost is
$542,000, including $41,700 that was appropriated in FY13-14 for design. The total grant of $487,800 will be
applied to the construction planned for FY15-16.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
LOCATION PHOTO MAP
I-37
PROJECT: PVDS ROADWAY REALIGNMENT
TYPE: Roadway Project
LOCATION: PVDS
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The project would re-align approximately 1.6 miles of Palos Verdes
Drive South which is located within and traverses the Abalone
Cove, Portuguese Bend, and Klondike Canyon Landslides. The
location of the roadway is constantly moving as the sub-soils within
the landslide move. Extensive grading is needed to re-establish
(relocate) the roadway within the right-of-way.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $3,060,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $3,060,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Project design of $245,000 was appropriated in FY13-14.
I-38
PROJECT: WESTERN AVENUE TRAFFIC
IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Western Avenue
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Western Avenue Task Force group was formed consisting of
RPV, City LA, and Caltrans. Since its inception, the working group
completed a Western Avenue Corridor Study in 2007, which is a
strategic action plan that:
• Identified the current and future deficiencies in the multi-modal
transportation system within the corridor; and
• Recommended consensus-based solutions (including required
strategies) to address the deficiencies.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $3,200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $3,200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
50-50 sharing agreement with a $1.6 million City contribution coming from CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-39
PROJECT: HAWTHORNE BLVD RIGHT OF WAY
BEAUTIFICATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Hawthorne Blvd (City Hall to Northerly City Limits)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Beautification improvements to the City’s right-of-way along
Hawthorne Blvd would include landscaping and masking blight
conditions created by failed fences, walls and other private
improvements. The medians in this area will be improved by
landscape and/or hardscape enhancements. This allocation would
fund a design and plan for those improvements that have a
preliminary cost estimate of $2.2 to $2.6 million.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $150,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $150,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-40
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING
Pursuant to a formula set out in Tariff Rule 20A by the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC), Southern California Edison is required to set aside an annual
amount of work credits for the purpose of undergrounding electrical utilities within
each city. Work credits are not funds available to the City to expend; they are utility
company funds budgeted to perform engineering and construction work. To
qualify, cities must determine that
• Undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy concentration of
overhead electric facilities
• The street or road or right-of-way is extensively used by the general public
and carries a high volume of pedestrian or vehicle traffic.
• The street, road or right-of-way adjoins or passes through a civic area or
public recreation area or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general
public.
• The street or road or right-of-way is considered an arterial street or major
collector as defined in the Governor's Office of Planning and Research
General Plan Guidelines.
Under the tariff, work credits not committed to a qualifying project in one year are
carried over to the next year. Annually, the City receives approximately $80,000
in Rule 20A funds. As of May 2012, the City’s Rule 20A fund balance was
$839,749. In 2009, the CPUC amended the code to allow for governments to
“mortgage” their current year’s work credits up to an additional five years in order
to be able to undertake a qualifying Rule 20A project sooner than otherwise
possible.
The following project(s) has been identified that meet the criterion for the usage
of Rule 20A work credits and would benefit the City as whole.
I-41
PROJECT: CRENSHAW BLVD UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd at Crest Road
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION: The project will underground overhead utility lines along Crenshaw
Blvd south of Crest Road. This project qualifies for Rule 20A funding.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $120,000
CONSTRUCTION $1,080,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget. This project is entirely funded by Rule 20A work credits.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-42
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
In June 2004, the City’s consulting engineers prepared an Update to the Storm
Drain Master Plan. The updated plan identified serious storm drain deficiencies
that required significant repair. The update identified 38 high-priority projects,
which were the basis for establishing a “user fee.” Since then, some projects have
been completed, and others have been reassessed to meet changing priorities and
needs. A new Master Plan of Drainage is underway and expected to be completed
in FY14-15. It is expected that new projects and priorities will be identified as the
City seeks to eliminate deficiencies in the storm drain system infrastructure and
add the structural improvements required for both water quality and flood
protection. The 38 projects identified in the 2004 Master Plan have been grouped
into 12 project areas, as listed below; however, these groupings may become
obsolete with the new Master Plan.
Area 1: Sunnyside Ridge
Area 2: McCarrell Canyon Storm Drain System
Area 3: Lower San Ramon Canyon/Tarapaca Canyon
Area 4: Altamira Canyon
Area 5: Palos Verdes Drive East/Miraleste Canyon
Area 6: San Pedro and Averill Canyons
Area 7: Via Colinita Vickery Canyon
Area 8: Miraleste and Chandeleur
Area 9: Palos Verdes Drive East Switchbacks
Area 10: Hawthorne Boulevard
Area 11: Palos Verdes Drive South
Area 12: Citywide Storm Drain Programs
I-43
PROJECT: STORM DRAIN LINING
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 12
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
All CMP storm drain lines within the City have reached their design
life expectancy and need to be lined to extend their life another 30+
years. CMP dating back to the 1940s have been discovered and
require rehabilitation along with those most recently installed in the
1970s. A large number of drainage problems citywide can be
overcome by relining deteriorated pipes and improving inlets and
outlet structures.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $335,278 $340,836 $347,653 $350,000 $350,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $335,278 $340,836 $347,653 $350,000 $350,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: WQFP user fees through Year 3 (FY16-17) and the CIP Reserve thereafter.
Ongoing maintenance costs should decrease, as pipes which have been lined generally require less
maintenance resulting in a cost savings. Because the Storm Drain User Fee sunsets in FY15-16, lining projects
will compete with other infrastructure rehabilitation projects for funding the CIP Reserve in the future.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
LOCATION PHOTO MAP
I-44
.
PROJECT:
SOUTH HAWTHORNE/VIA FRASCATI
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 10
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project will improve drainage across Hawthorne Boulevard by
replacing two existing 18” pipes with one 24” and one 30” RCP
pipes. Additionally, a second location on South Hawthorne will be
evaluated after episodes of flooding in recent years. A curb and
gutter project on Via Frascati will serve to direct drainage into the
street and existing catch basins, which drain into the San Pedro
Canyon.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $440,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $440,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: WQFP user fees
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As this project makes improvements to two different locations, the project may be split into two discreet projects
once the scoping is completed.
I-45
PROJECT: ALTAMIRA CANYON DRAINAGE
PROJECT STUDY REPORT
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 4
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Project Study Report is expected to include: 1) a study of the
drainage area; 2) a study of the drainage needs; 3) multiple design
alternatives; 4) identification of environmental requirements; 5)
identification of right-of-way needs; and 6) a recommended scope
for development of an engineering design leading to construction of
drainage improvements. Any improvements to drainage in Altamira
Canyon will be complex due to right-of-way and landslide issues.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $500,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Preventing runoff water from entering the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project is expected to help slow movement within the Abalone Cove landslide, eventually
affecting the land movement at Palos Verdes Drive South.
I-46
PROJECT: PAINTBRUSH CANYON DRAINAGE
PROJECT STUDY REPORT
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 11
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Project Study Report is expected to include: 1) a study of the
drainage area; 2) a study of the drainage needs; 3) multiple design
alternatives; 4) identification of environmental requirements; 5)
identification of right-of-way needs; and 6) a recommended scope
for development of an engineering design leading to construction
of drainage improvements. Any improvements to drainage in
Altamira Canyon will be complex due to right-of-way and landslide
issues.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $120,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $120,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Preventing runoff water from entering the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project is expected to help slow movement within the Portuguese Bend landslide,
eventually affecting the land movement at Palos Verdes Drive South.
I-47
PROJECT: PVDS ROADWAY DRAINAGE
PROJECT AT SACRED COVE
TYPE: Drainage Project
LOCATION: PVDS
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project would construct improvements along a section of PVDS
located in the Sacred Cove area. The project would aid in the
passive drainage of runoff that is now trapped due to ground
movement. The location of the roadway is constantly moving as the
sub-soils within the landslide move. Grading is needed to re-
establish (relocate) the drainage system inlet within the right-of-
way.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $450,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $450,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-48
PROJECT: STORM DRAIN POINT-REPAIR
PROJECTS
TYPE: Drainage Project
LOCATION: Project Area 12
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As the City lines the storm drains to extend useful life, sections of
pipeline are found to be in need of repair. This project would
address point-repairs at 4 to 6 locations with costs ranging from
$50,000 to $250,000 for each location.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $150,000 $900,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $150,000 $900,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-49
LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS
The City’s Landslide Mitigation Projects refers to projects that lessen the effect of
erosion on the Portuguese Bend Landslide, which is the only continuously active
landslide in the United States. These projects are intended to address landslide
movement and public safety risks by using proven methods such as runoff
diversion, dewatering and geospatial monitoring.
I-50
PROJECT: INSTALLATION OF LANDSLIDE
DEWATERING WELLS
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: Portuguese Bend and Abalone Cove
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Dewatering Wells are a high priority and are considered to be the
most effective method of minimizing runoff from entering the
landslide, which helps slow land movement within the landslide.
All runoff that percolates into the ground eventually becomes part
of the groundwater and will cause an increase in the depth of the
groundwater table. Removing groundwater through dewatering
wells helps to lower the groundwater table, relieving soil pressures
at depth and minimizing the negative effects groundwater has on
the landslide. These new wells should improve the system’s
effectiveness by increasing the system’s water removal capacity
and by removing water more rapidly. The cost to install each well
is estimated to be $90,000.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $360,000 $450,000 $450,000 $180,000 $180,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $360,000 $450,000 $450,000 $180,000 $180,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-51
STORM WATER QUALITY
In order to comply with the new Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4)
Permit requirements in California, the Peninsula cities are working together to
address storm water quality issues by developing an Enhanced Watershed
Management Plan (EWMP). The plan may require capital improvements as well
as operational changes. Capital improvements will likely include treatment
projects, as well as water quality monitoring stations in storm drain outfalls to be
used in wet or dry weather. To meet requirements of the Regional Water Quality
Board, it is anticipated that automated data collection systems will need to be
designed and installed in several locations in the various watersheds of the City.
I-52
PROJECT: DRAINAGE AREA MONITORING
SYSTEM
TYPE: Stormwater Quality Project
LOCATION: City wide, at storm drain outfalls
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In response to a new MS4 permit requirement, the City will need to
monitor water quality in storm drain outfalls in both dry and wet
weather. To meet data standards, it is anticipated that automated
data collection systems will need to be designed and installed in
several locations in the various watersheds of the City.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $50,000
CONSTRUCTION $200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $50,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $300,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is required as part of the MS4 Permit
I-53
PROJECT: STORM WATER QUALITY REGIONAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TYPE: Stormwater Quality Project
LOCATION: TBD
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In order to comply with the new MS4 Permit requirements, the
Peninsula cities will work together to address storm water quality
issues by developing an Enhanced Watershed Management Plan
(EWMP), including the development of structural treatment
projects. This is an estimate of the City’s share of the cost to build
these Storm Water Quality improvement projects. The first phase
projects must be built within 30 months of when the MS4 Permit is
received. Scope and timing of future phases will be determined
upon approval of the EWMP by the Regional Storm Water Quality
Board.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Required as part of MS4 Permit Enhanced Watershed Management Plan. Locations to be determined once
pollutant monitoring studies are analyzed. The FY14-15 first phase project cost is $300,000; however,
$200,000 was appropriated in FY13-14 and is expected to be carried forward to FY14-15. The City will have
an ongoing commitment to additional projects in the future. In the absence of more defined information, a
placeholder of $100,000 annually has been included as the City’s contribution to other storm water quality
projects.
I-54
SEWER PROJECTS
The City’s sanitary sewer system is essential for City operations, yet it has not
required significant expenditures in past years due to an inter-local agreement with
Los Angeles County for maintenance activities. The City owns the system, but the
County has the primary responsibility for ongoing maintenance. The County
collects a sewer fee from the City’s property owners that may be inadequate to
maintain the system. Although the County maintains the City’s sewer system, the
City retains responsibility for its operation, public safety and welfare. The City, not
the County, maintains legal and regulatory responsibility (i.e. any state or federal
fines resulting from spillage).
The City conducted a survey of the system, and in 2004 the Sanitary Sewer Master
Plan was created to help in the management of this asset. The study examined
sample areas throughout the City and assessed the overall system as “fair.” The
inspection revealed root intrusion in the pipes and cracking in the pipes, in addition
to accumulated fats and grease clogging certain areas. It appeared that the
County had not been performing preventative maintenance in prior years. Without
regular maintenance, overflows due to root and grease blockages will occur. To
minimize the potential for overflow and to restore and maintain the system in
“good” condition, a significant investment in pipeline inspection, repair and
maintenance is required. The County is nearing completion of a full inspection and
cleaning of all RPV sewer mains.
The projects identified herein were included in the City’s Wastewater Master Plan
Update which was completed in 2009 to address potential locations of under-
capacity (the ability of the existing pipe to convey sewage flows without overflowing
into the street). The County maintenance and repair program does not provide for
replacement of pipeline due to capacity issues.
The Abalone Cove Sewer District is a unique system serving 110 developed
parcels in an active landslide area, and is maintained by the City. Sewer user fees
are collected from property owners, but are not sufficient to provide for
maintenance and rehabilitation of the system. The Abalone Cove Sewer District
is heavily subsidized by the City.
I-55
PROJECT: SEWER CAPACITY PROJECT-
GINGER ROOT LANE
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City’s sewer system was identified in the 2009
Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update to be under capacity. This
project will evaluate that determination using specific flow testing;
and, if required, replace 952 feet of 8 inch sewer pipe. The pipe will
be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified clay pipeline. The pipeline runs
along Ginger Root Lane between Narcissa Drive and Cinnamon
Lane. This section of pipeline is over capacity when analyzed
considering the factor of safety flow run.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $29,000
CONSTRUCTION $166,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $8,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $203,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 7 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the
plan.
I-56
PROJECT: SEWER CAPACITY PROJECT-
MALAGA CANYON
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City’s sewer system was identified in the 2009
Sanitary Sewer Master Plan update to be under capacity. This
project will evaluate that determination using specific flow testing;
and, if required, replace 1,850 feet of 10 inch sewer pipe. The pipe
will be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified clay pipeline. The pipeline
runs behind properties in Malaga Canyon parallel to Basswood
Avenue between Mossbank Drive and Mazur Drive. This section of
pipeline is over capacity when analyzed considering the factor of
safety flow run.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $59,000
CONSTRUCTION $335,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $13,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $407,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 5 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the
plan.
I-57
PROJECT: SEWER CAPACITY PROJECT- OTHER
LOCATIONS
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: Various
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Several smaller locations throughout the City may require repairs.
The 2009 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan indicated that unidentified
sections of the City’s sewer system may be under capacity. The
Plan indicates that these projects could replace 1,951 feet of 8 inch
sewer pipe with 12 inch vitrified clay pipelines.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $75,000
CONSTRUCTION $340,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $50,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $465,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 8 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the
plan.
I-58
PROJECT: ABALONE COVE SEWER DISTRICT
REHABILITATION
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: Abalone Cove Sewer District
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Construction of the Abalone Cove Sewer system was completed in
2001 to replace property owner’s septic tanks in the active
landslide area of the City. Minimal maintenance has been
performed since that time. Due to the active landslide, the system
is now in need of more substantive rehabilitation and upgrades to
comply with current engineering, operations and maintenance
standards in Los Angeles County.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-59
RECREATION, PARKS & OPEN SPACE
The development and maintenance of community parks, recreational areas and
open space has been established as a top priority for the City as stated in the
General Plan and various other planning documents. The General Plan states,
“It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect and
enhance its natural resources, beauty and open space for the benefit and
enjoyment of its residents and the residents of the entire region. Future
development shall recognize the sensitivity of the natural environment and
be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the protection of it.”
Many park sites and open space areas have been acquired throughout the City,
and some have been developed for use by the general public. Some sites remain
vacant or underutilized. The City Council approved the Vision Plan in September
2008 which outlines various trail and park projects which have been included in
this plan. The Public Use Master Plan has also outlined a strategy for the
development of trails. These recreational projects add to the vibrancy of the
community and they are designed to contribute to all residents’ quality of life.
Parks and other open spaces have been carefully planned to take advantage of
the beautiful coastline and natural landscape of the peninsula.
I-60
PROJECT: LOWER HESSE PARK
IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE 1)
TYPE: Recreation, Parks & Open Space
LOCATION: Lower Hesse Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
The scope of work of the proposed ‘phase one’ of Lower Hesse
Park includes construction of a natural parking lot, restrooms,
tennis court, play area, picnic area and some landscaping. These
basic items are chosen from the concept plan option “Pacific” which
was selected by the City Council.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $50,000
CONSTRUCTION $450,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Landscape maintenance is estimated to be about $12,000 annually, with annual water irrigation cost of
about $1,500.
I-61
PROJECT: HESSE PARK PARKING LOT
RESURFACING
TYPE: Recreation, Parks and Open Space
LOCATION: Hesse Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
Hesse Park parking lot is one of the frequently used City facilities.
The pavement at this parking lot is deteriorating and needs
resurfacing. Delaying this improvement will add to the cost of work
due to extension of cracks into the depth of the existing pavement
caused by motorists’ usage.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $10,000
CONSTRUCTION $200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $210,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION IN FY 14-15 BUDGET
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The parking lot will have a 5 year useful life once the project is completed. At that time, a slurry-seal will be
needed to extend the useful life.
I-62
PROJECT: POINT VICENTE INTERPRETIVE
CENTER (PVIC) SCREENING WALL
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: PVIC
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
In order to provide a building identification sign that will also screen
the existing above ground power generator, gas tank, electrical
panels/ transformers, a 100-foot long concrete serpentine shaped wall
is proposed to be installed in the lawn area adjacent to the pedestrian
walkway. This decorative screening wall will include building
identification.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $15,000
CONSTRUCTION $95,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $110,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION IN FY 13-14 BUDGET
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-63
PROJECT: SUNNYSIDE TRAIL SEGMENT
PROJECT
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Sunnyside Ridge Road (Intersection of Sunnyside Ridge Trail and
the Sol Vista Segment Trail)
DEPARTMENT: Community Development/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Sunnyside Segment Trail is a point-to-point trail segment that
begins on Sunnyside Ridge Road at the intersection of the Sunnyside
Ridge Trail and the currently unused Sol Vista Segment Trail on the
old Narbonne Right-of-Way, as indicated in the City’s Conceptual Trail
Plan. The proposal is to provide a usable trail linkage for pedestrians
and equestrians within a recorded trail segment that traverses a
privately owned lot that is currently developed with a single-family
residence that was formally part of an old City right-of-way. The trail
connection would involve the provision of a 5-foot wide decomposed
granite surface trail.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $70,000
CONSTRUCTION $395,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $465,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: $300,000 Grant from Regional Park and Open Space District, $165,000 from CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-64
PROJECT: POINT VICENTE INTERPRETIVE
CENTER EXHIBITS
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Point Vicente Interpretive Center
DEPARTMENT: Recreation & Parks/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Private restricted donations have been collected for enhancements to
the PVIC museum exhibits.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $400,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $400,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: Private Restricted Donations.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-65
PROJECT: POINT VICENTE INTERPRETIVE
CENTER LANDSCAPING
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Point Vicente Interpretive Center
DEPARTMENT: Recreation & Parks/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Private restricted donations have been collected for improvements to
outdoor landscaping at PVIC.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $400,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $400,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: Private Restricted Donations.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-66
PROJECT: GATEWAY PARK DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: PVDS in the Portuguese Landslide Area
DEPARTMENT: Public Works/Community Development
DESCRIPTION:
The Vision Plan includes a proposed Gateway Park, a 23-acre site
within the City’s Landslide Moratorium area just north of PVDS
between the Portuguese Bend residential community and Klondike
Canyon. Under the Vision Plan, the site has been approved for a
combination of uses such as a “gateway park” for users of the Nature
Preserve’s trail system, an outdoor education/nature appreciation
center for school and community groups and an equestrian center.
The following components of the approved concept plan are being
developed as part of the California Coastal Trail Project and PVDS
Landslide East End Road Realignment Project: Trail head, signage,
fencing, and public parking area.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $200,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-67
PROJECT: ABALONE COVE BEACH ACCESS
ROAD
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Abalone Cove
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Abalone Cove Beach access road from PVDS to the beachfront
must be re-graded and re-paved to improve accessibility for
emergency response and maintenance vehicles.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-68
PROJECT: GRANDVIEW PARK IMPROVEMENTS
(PHASE 1)
TYPE: Recreation, Parks & Open Space
LOCATION: Grandview Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
The scope of work of the proposed ‘phase one’ of Grandview park
includes construction of a natural parking lot, restrooms/office, play
area, picnic area and some landscaping. These basic items are
chosen from the concept plan option “Sycamore” which was
selected by the City Council.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $75,000
CONSTRUCTION $560,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $635,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
I-69
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs
through various planning processes, but currently there are not resources to
complete the projects. As funding becomes available and the City Council
prioritizes and approves projects, they may be moved into the funded Five-Year
CIP schedule.
I-70
Potential Safety City Council
Project Page Funding Goal Priority Minimum Maximum
Buildings and Other Facility
Improvements
Citywide ADA Transition Plan
Implementation 70 X X $ 4,670,000 4,670,000$
Point Vicente Park Community Center 71 X 3,000,000 8,000,000
Corporation Storage Yard Relocation 72 300,000 1,000,000
Intangible Capital Outlay
Infrastructure Management Plan 74 X X 125,000 175,000
Roadway Infrastructure
Hawthorne Blvd. Median Improvements
(Via Rivera to City Hall)76 250,000 250,000
Lower Point Vicente Park Access
Modification Project (PVDW at PVIC)77 X X X 250,000 300,000
Operational Improvements at Crenshaw
& Crest 78 X X X 470,000 520,000
Crenshaw Blvd Extension Parking
Improvements 79 X 125,000 150,000
Hawthorne Blvd. Right of Way
Beautification 80 X 2,200,000 2,600,000
Hawthorne Blvd. Bike Lane Gap Closure 81 X X 1,200,000 1,500,000
Traffic Safety Improvements - PVDE at
Miraleste Drive 82 X X X 200,000 300,000
Utility Undergrounding
Utility Undergrounding at 25th Street 84 X X 1,000,000 1,100,000
Utility Undergrounding at Entrance to
PVIC 85 X X 150,000 200,000
Utility Undergrounding at PVDS and
Terranea Way 86 X X 150,000 200,000
Storm Drain System
Altamira Canyon 88 X X 1,600,000 5,350,000
Paintbrush Canyon Drainage 89 X X 2,568,000 2,568,000
PVDE - Miraleste Canyon 90 X X 2,500,000 3,200,000
San Pedro & Averill Canyons 91 X X 2,700,000 3,300,000
Landslide Mitigation Projects
Landslide Early Warning System 93 300,000 300,000
Recreation, Parks & Open Space
Restroom at Del Cerro Park 95 250,000 300,000
Preserve Trail Plan - New Trail
Implementation 96 X X 150,000 150,000
Lower Point Vicente Park Improvement
Project 97 X 2,400,000 2,400,000
Civic Center Skate Plaza 98 X 650,000 750,000
California Coastal Trail Improvements 99 X 223,000 223,000
Coast Vision Plan -
Trailhead/Overlook/Vista Point
Development 100 X 800,000 1,040,000
Totals (Min. and Max.) $28,231,000 40,546,000$
Cost Range
RPV Capital Improvement Plan - Unfunded Projects
I-71
BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
I-72
PROJECT: CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Various
DEPARTMENT: Public W orks
DESCRIPTION:
The Citywide ADA Transition Plan, adopted by the City Council on
June 4, 2013, identified total costs of $11.85 million for
implementation. The cost estimate included improvements to ADA
compliance at the Civic Center (buildings and grounds) totaling
$1.36 million, and those at Ladera Linda Park totaling $1.72 million.
Any future improvements at those sites are expected to bring the
facilities into ADA compliance. Additionally, the total cost of $11.85
million includes right-of-way improvements totaling $2.64 million,
including curb ramps and bus stops. Those improvements will be
addressed as part of each roadway rehabilitation project. The
remaining identified costs of $6.12 million will be addressed through
an annual implementation allocation that began in FY13-14. Project
costs “funded” through FY18-19 total $1.45 million. The remaining
portion of the $6.12 million, which has not been moved to the
“funded” list is included here.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $4.67 million
EET funding may become available.
I-73
PROJECT: POINT VICENTE PARK COMMUNITY
CENTER
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Point Vicente/Civic Center
DEPARTMENT: City Manager/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Originally studied by the Open Space Planning, Recreation and
Parks Task Force in 2004, the concept for this facility was later
refined during the redevelopment of the Coast Vision Plan. Adopted
by the City Council in 2008, the latest concept calls for a 20,000
square-foot community center that could accommodate meeting
space for community groups, recreational facilities, classroom
space and a full-sized recreational pool.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Impact will need to be assessed, as projects are considered.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $3,000,000 - $8,000,000
A private donation of $120,000 has been made, and additional donations and/or other outside funding
may become available based upon the scope of the project.
I-74
PROJECT: CORPORATION STORAGE YARD
RELOCATION
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Various Locations throughout the City
DEPARTMENT: City Manager/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
It has been proposed that City maintenance services be spread
citywide in strategic locations with a central office in City Hall. The
existing corporations/storage yard is located on the Point Vicente
Park site which had been identified for various other community
uses due to its prime location.
It may be feasible to create a central location for the storage yard
with satellite locations throughout the City, serving the storage and
other construction needs of the Public Works Department. The
central location of the storage yard will be situated at or near City
Hall for administrative purposes. This central location will control all
satellite locations through the use of maintenance personnel and
through the efficient use of the City’s network.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The satellite locations will fulfill the following roles: there will be an office trailer at each location; a construction
yard for contractors located throughout the City (possibly generating rental income for the City); possible
satellite EOC centers for access throughout the City; and storage space for various equipment.
Estimated Cost: $300,000 - $1,000,000
I-75
INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
I-76
PROJECT: INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT
PLAN
TYPE: Intangible Capital Outlay
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works & Finance
DESCRIPTION:
The RPV Infrastructure Management Plan (IMP) will be the tool to
chart an operations and financial course for the actions and funding
required to maintain and preserve community public property, which
will improve the condition of each infrastructure category. The IMP
will provide a comprehensive basis to create a reality-based capital
improvement program by allowing the City Council and the
community to determine the impact of different funding
strategies/scenarios and prioritize project delivery over the course
of multiple planning decades. The IMP will also estimate technical
and funding requirements and make recommendations of policies
to assist the City Council with program implementation, goal-setting,
and prioritization.
The IMP will include:
• Integration with the City’s geographic information system
(GIS) and the future use of an asset/maintenance
management system
• A civic engagement process to invite, assess, evaluate, and
include citizen-initiated capital improvement projects (CIP)
• Identification of best management practices and key
performance indicators for each infrastructure category to
help guide policy formulation and decision-making
• A web-based tool for “what-if” scenarios based on priorities
and economic and community factors
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Approximately $5,000 annually to maintain the web-based planning tool.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $125,000 to $175,000
I-77
ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
I-78
PROJECT:
HAWTHORNE BLVD. MEDIAN
IMPROVEMENTS (VIA RIVERA TO
CITY HALL)
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Hawthorne Blvd. (Via Rivera to City Hall)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The development of this median would include installing draught
tolerant landscaping which will require minimal maintenance.
Development will also include the installation of irrigation systems
and controllers, hardscape, and decorative stone.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed. However, a rough estimate of annual maintenance is about 10% of total project cost.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000
I-79
PROJECT: LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK
ACCESS MODIFICATION PROJECT
TYPE: Traffic Improvements
LOCATION: PVDW/PVDS at Lower Point Vicente Park entrance
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve access into and out of the Lower Point Vicente park area by
restricting turn movements to right turn only out of the site at the
southern entrance/exit to minimize vehicle conflicts while negotiating
turn movements.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000 - $300,000
Highway Safety grant money may become available.
I-80
PROJECT:
OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS-
CRENSHAW BLVD. AND CREST
DRIVE
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd. and Crest Drive
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Currently this intersection is a four-way stop controlled
intersection. During the AM and PM peak hours, the westbound
left-turn lanes back up for several hundreds of feet creating
extensive delay and long vehicle queues. An operational
improvement to the intersection is required to improve traffic flow.
A study has been conducted to determine the best solution, and a
roundabout is being considered.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $470,000 - $520,000
Highway Safety grant money may become available.
I-81
PROJECT: CRENSHAW BOULEVARD EXTENSION
PARKING IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd (Valley View Rd to Burma Rd)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In an effort to improve safety, parking and access to the Nature
Preserve entrance near Del Cerro Park, parking improvements and
restrictions are needed to accommodate the growing user demand
and need for emergency vehicle access.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $125,000 - $150,000
I-82
PROJECT: HAWTHORNE BLVD RIGHT OF WAY
BEAUTIFICATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Hawthorne Blvd (City Hall to Northerly City Limits)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The City’s Right of Way along Hawthorne Blvd will be beautified by
landscaping and masking blight conditions created by failed fences,
walls and other private improvements. The medians in this area will
be improved by landscape and/or hardscape enhancements. A study
has been funded for FY14-15 to identify options and cost estimates.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,200,00 - $2,600,000
I-83
PROJECT: HAWTHORNE BLVD BIKE LANE GAP
CLOSURE
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Hawthorne Blvd (Vallon Drive to Dupre Road)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project will improve roadway safety and complete a bike lane gap
closure that exists due to on-street parking demand, roadway
configuration and existing median barriers.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,200,000-$1,500,000
Highway Safety grant money may become available.
I-84
PROJECT:
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS –
PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT
MIRALESTE DRIVE
TYPE: Traffic Improvements
LOCATION: PVDE at Miraleste Drive
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve intersection operations to create improved traffic flow,
vehicle and pedestrian safety. Operational improvements could
include a roundabout. If a traffic signal were considered, the cost
estimate would increase; and Marymount College would likely fund
a small share of project cost.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
If a traffic signal is contemplated, annual maintenance cost could be about $7,000.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $200,000 - $300,000
Highway Safety grant money could become available.
I-85
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
I-86
PROJECT: UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT 25TH
STREET
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: 25th Street
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and
coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The City
will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,
communications, etc.) to locate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison’s Rule 20A Funding, which accumulates at a
rate of about $80,000 per year. The balance of this funding has been preliminarily committed to a project on
Crenshaw Blvd in FY18-19.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 - $1,100,000
I-87
PROJECT: UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT
ENTRANCE TO PVIC
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: Palos Verdes Drive South (at PVIC)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and
coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The City
will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,
communications, etc.) to locate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison’s Rule 20A Funding, which accumulates at a
rate of about $80,000 per year. The balance of this funding has been preliminarily committed to a project on
Crenshaw Blvd in FY18-19.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000 - $200,000
I-88
PROJECT: UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT PVDS
AND TERRANEA WAY
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: PVDS and Terranea Way
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and
coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The City
will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,
communications, etc.) to locate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison’s Rule 20A Funding, which accumulates at a
rate of about $80,000 per year. The balance of this funding has been preliminarily committed to a project on
Crenshaw Blvd in FY18-19.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000 - $200,000
I-89
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
I-90
PROJECT: ALTAMIRA CANYON
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 4
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
A project within lower Altamira Canyon to aid in slowing the damage
being caused by storm water runoff through the entire reach of the
Canyon is needed. The installation of Gabion type erosion control
structures within lower Altamira Canyon are needed to help control
runoff velocities and minimize erosion within the canyon.
This project includes the installation of protective measures to
minimize further erosion in the Altamira Canyon. This project could
range from stabilization at bends in stream beds, with limited
velocity controls, to channeled stabilization.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Note: The Altamira Canyon project has been studied and analyzed over the past decades; however the need
to minimize runoff from entering the ground in Altamira Canyon still remains. A project study report has been
funded for FY14-15.
This estimate does not include right of way costs. A previously designed and funded project was abandoned
due to right of way issues and owners lack of support.
Estimated Cost: $1,600,000 - $5,350,000
I-91
PROJECT: PAINTBRUSH CANYON DRAINAGE
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Portuguese Bend
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Paintbrush Canyon Drainage System project will capture runoff
at the head of the Portuguese Bend landslide in three locations,
transfer that runoff via surface mounted High Density Polyethylene
(HDPE) pipe under Palos Verdes Drive South, (through an existing
steel tunnel) and continue along the existing storm drain pipe
alignment to the ocean.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Preventing runoff water from entering the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project is expected to help slow movement within the Portuguese Bend landslide,
eventually affecting the land movement at Palos Verdes Drive South. A project study report has been proposed
for FY16-17.
Estimated Cost: $2,568,000
I-92
PROJECT: PVDE- MIRALESTE CANYON
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 5
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Work within this project area includes storm drainage systems along
Palos Verdes Drive East at the Northern end of PVDE, South
Coach, Rocking Horse, Clevis, North Colt, South Colt, Via Canada,
and at South Via Canada. This project includes the installation of a
number of pipelines and re-setting surface drainage systems to drain
into Miraleste Canyon.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,500,000 - $3,200,000
I-93
PROJECT: SAN PEDRO & AVERILL CANYONS
TYPE: Storm Drain Systems
LOCATION: Project Area 6
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Work within this project area would include storm drainage systems
at Miraleste, South Miraleste, North Corsini, Via Colinita, La Vista,
Vista Mesa, and a curb and gutter project on Via Frascati. This
project would include the installation of a number of pipelines and
regarding of roads and surface drainage systems to drain into the
San Pedro and Averill Canyons. A project at Miraleste Plaza is
currently under design.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 - $3,300,000
I-94
LANDSLIDE MITIGATION
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
I-95
PROJECT: LANDSLIDE EARLY WARNING
SYSTEM (LEWS)
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: Palos Verdes Drive South in the Portuguese Bend Landslide Area
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The main sewer trunk line owned and operated by the Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County, and which serves a significant
portion of the residential properties in RPV, parallels the PVDS
roadway aboveground in the landslide area. Both facilities require
constant maintenance due to landslide movement, which poses a
significant operational hazard should the landslide experience rapid
land movement. Closure of these facilities would be highly
disruptive to the city’s economic vitality, transportation, public health
and safety and use of public open space and trails. Sewer overflows
from the trunk line could potentially threaten the ecosystems of the
nearby Pacific Ocean coastline. A landslide early warning system
(LEWS) would provide critical advanced knowledge of changed
landslide conditions by alerting public safety and public works first
responders, who would be able to respond sooner and more
proactively with public safety information and preventative
measures.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
It is estimated that LEWS annual operations and maintenance cost may be approximately $30,000 per year,
which would include scheduled on-site equipment inspection and fees for wireless or satellite communication
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Sensors placed in the area would transmit data through a
wireless or satellite-based system to a web-hosted application
designed to send alerts to public safety and public works first
responders when specified land movement criteria is reached.
Many of the existing dewatering wells may be suitable for
sensor deployment. The first responders would then be
afforded more time to notify users of the public open space and
trails in the area, mobilize equipm ent, establish roadway
detours and alternative sewer conveyance, all of which is
intended to protect the public and the environment. There are
partnership possibilities with the Sanitation Districts of LA
County and the LA County Sheriff’s and Fire Departm ents.
I-96
RECREATION, PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
I-97
PROJECT: RESTROOM AT DEL CERRO PARK
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Del Cerro Park
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks/Community Development
DESCRIPTION:
This project would include the construction of a restroom at Del
Cerro park to serve the park visitors and the users of the trails in the
Portuguese Bend Open Space.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000 - $300,000
I-98
PROJECT: PRESERVE TRAILS PLAN - NEW
TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve
DEPARTMENT: Community Development/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In October 2012, the City Council adopted an updated Preserve
Trails Plan (PTP) for the NCCP’s Palos Verdes Nature Preserve
which identifies trail routes and trail uses within the Preserve.
Pursuant to the approved management agreement between the
City and PVPLC, the PVPLC is responsible for maintenance and
repair of existing unimproved trails in the Preserve while the City is
responsible for the construction of new trails identified in the PTP.
According to the PTP, there are 3 approved trail routes that
currently do not exist and need to be constructed at some point by
the City. Since projects are moving forward on two of the three new
trails needed (the Smugglers Trail in the Abalone Cove Reserve
and the Switchback Trail in the San Ramon Reserve, construction
of the Crystal Trail (.12 mile) in the Forrestal Reserve remains as
the only new trail that needs construction. In addition, the Rim Trail
will need to be relocated since the current route passes over private
property in Rolling Hills.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000
If a trail improvement is considered to be a critical link, outside grant funding may become available.
If the trail improvement is in the right-of-way, then potential funding may become available through the
Active Transportation Program.
I-99
PROJECT: LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TYPE: Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION: Lower Point Vicente
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The park improvement plan for Lower Point Vicente derives from an
extensive public outreach process associated with the City Council
adopted Vision Plan. The scope of work consists of constructing new
decomposed granite trails, overlooks, reconfigured and new parking
spaces (including new upper terrace parking lot), drainage facilities
(including a bioswale), landscaping, fencing, way finding signs and
minor site grading to accommodate the improvements (excavation
cannot occur in areas capped for the lead remediation.)
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,400,000
I-100
PROJECT: CIVIC CENTER SKATE PLAZA
TYPE: Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION: Point Vicente Park
DEPARTMENT: Public Works & Recreation
DESCRIPTION:
This project could include construction of: 1) a 15,000 square foot
skate plaza; 2) a restroom; 3) appropriate parking and benches; and
4) landscaping. If a skate plaza is determined to be a feasible use
through the Program of Utilization that controls the site, Staff will
continue to work with the City Council and local skate advocate
groups.
The plaza/skate area would be constructed of concrete with
complimenting walkways, stage, handrails, planters, landscaping,
restroom building and parking.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Annual facility maintenance is currently estimated to be $13,000. Additional Staffing and security may be
necessary to operate the facility.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $650,000-$750,000.
Private funding may become available for project construction and ongoing maintenance.
I-101
PROJECT: CALIFORNIA COASTAL TRAIL
IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE: Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION: PVDW – Marguerite Drive to Calle Entradero & PVIC Blufftop
DEPARTMENT: Public Works & Recreation
DESCRIPTION:
Two sections of the California Coastal Trail near Point Vicente
Interpretive Center (PVIC) and Oceanfront Estates are paved with
asphalt that has deteriorated. This project would replace the asphalt
with decomposed granite, enhancing the aesthetic value of the
California Coastal Trail within the City.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $223,000
I-102
PROJECT:
COAST VISION PLAN
TRAILHEAD/OVERLOOK/VISTA POINT
DEVELOPMENT
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Various Locations
DEPARTMENT: Public Works/Community Development
DESCRIPTION:
The Vision Plan identifies the construction of trailheads at key
entrances to the existing City trail system along with overlooks and
vista points within the Vision Plan project area. The trailheads would
consist of a permeable surface pad, a bench, a plastic bag kiosk for
dog owners, trash and recycling receptacles, signage, a freestanding
kiosk for trail notices, small native trees for shade and pockets of
native shrubs, where appropriate. The overlooks/vista points would be
placed on decomposed granite or other permeable material with flush
stone edging and could include a semicircle bench, a stone pilaster
displaying pertinent information, a stone clad wall less than 3 feet in
height and pockets of native shrubs.
.
Phase 1 would involve a trail head at Shoreline Park/25th and
overlooks/vista points at Inspiration Point and Eagles Nest. Phase 2
would involve trail heads and overlooks/vistas at the cul-de-sac next
to St. Paul’s Church, Del Cerro Park, and the end of Ocean Terrace.
Phase 3 would involve a trail head at the Switchbacks/PVDE Turnout
and overlooks/vista points at the Switchbacks/PVDE Turnout,
Paintbrush Canyon/Burma Road, and Burma Road above Gateway
Park.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $100,000 to $130,000 per site X 8 sites = Range of $800,000 to $1,040,000
I-103