RPVCCA_SR_2013_06_01_05_Draft_CIPCITY OF
MEMORANDUM
R!\NCHO PALOS VERDES
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
REVIEWED BY:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCI~
DENNIS McLEAN,DIRECTOR OF FINANCE &INFORMATIONC&t
TECHNOLOGY
JUNE 1,2013
DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
(Supports 2013 City Council Goals of Public Infrastructure &
Government Efficiency,Fiscal Control,and Transparency)
CAROLYN LEHR,CITY MANAGER 0.9.-
Project Managers:Kathryn Down~~"Deputy Director of Finance &Information
Technology (VfI)+~
Ryan Mills,Senior Administrative AnalYsV
RECOMMENDATION
1.Review the draft 2013 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)and provide
direction to Staff;and
2.Approve Staff's recommendation for projects to be included in the draft FY13-14
budget.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)is a guide for the efficient and effective provision of
resources for improving and maintaining public infrastructure and facilities.The CIP is
segregated into both funded and unfunded projects and includes detailed "project sheets"
that provide a project description,project type (ex.Roadway Infrastructure),location,
department responsible,estimates of cost and the justification (ex.safety,City Council goal
or essential service).The CIP document does not include any projects with estimated
costs below the infrastructure capitalization threshold of $100,000.
Although the CIP document presents project funding for five years,the City Council
approves CIP projects for the upcoming fiscal year only.This gives the City Council the
5-1
DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 1,2013
Page 2
ability to shift priorities when needed,while at the same time identify future projects and
potential funding mechanisms.
Projects are generally added to the funded schedule as available funding sources are
identified (ex.grant funds).Projects are usually funded first from restricted funds,such as
Proposition C and TDA Article 3 funds,so as to be conservative in allocating General Fund
monies only when necessary.For the first time,Staff is recommending to plan for uses of
the CIP Reserve (funded with General Fund money equivalent to Transient Occupancy Tax
revenue)in years 2 through 5 of the CIP document.Now that a state grant has been
provided for a portion of the San Ramon Canyon Stabilization project and the City's share
will be funded either through the use of existing reserves or debt (or a combination of
same),Staff recommends populating the five years of the 2013 CIP with proposed uses of
the City's primary unrestricted funding source for infrastructure.
2013 CIP
The 2013 CIP was first presented to the City Council on May 7,2013.Since that
presentation,the following updates have been made:
1.The estimate for the Hesse Park Multi-Purpose Room Improvements,included in
FY13-14,has been reduced from $250,000 to $175,000;and
2.The construction of 2 new dewatering wells has been added to FY14-15.
The 2013 CIP includes the Five-Year CIP Funded Schedule (page 12 of the attached CIP)
that has been integrated into the draft 2013 Five-Year Financial Model.Projects in the
FY13-14 column of the Five-Year CIP Funded Schedule total $9,082,856,and are included
in Staff's working draft of the FY13-14 budget.Staff requests approval from the City
Council to include the $9,082,856 of projects in the draft FY13-14 budget to be presented
to City Council on June 1,2013.The Five-Year CIP Funded Schedule within the CIP
document does not include any projects with estimated costs below the $100,000
infrastructure capitalization threshold.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The CIP is a guide for the efficient and effective provision of resources for improving and
maintaining public infrastructure and facilities.Programming capital facilities and
improvements over time can promote better use of the City's limited financial resources,
reduce costs and assist in the coordination of public and private development.Based on
guidelines of the framework and those set forth by the City Council,Staff developed an
inventory of capital projects.This inventory was compiled through a comprehensive review
of existing reports,infrastructure plans,community input and the City Council's direction,
goals and priorities.Some of these plans include the following:the Pavement
Management System,Vision Plan,Sanitary Sewer Master Plan,Public Use Master Plan,
Trails Network Plan,Storm Drain Master Plan and the General Plan.
5-2
DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 1,2013
Page 3
As required by state law,the Planning Commission will conduct its review of the CIP at its
meeting on May 28,2013.The purpose is solely for the Planning Commission to adopt a
resolution,finding that the City's 2013 CIP is consistent with the goals and policies of the
General Plan.
The purpose of this presentation is to provide the City Council with an overview of projects
which have been proposed for the Five-Year CIP.After any changes directed by Council
have been made,Staff will return to the Council for formal adoption of the 2013 CIP
document on June 18,2013.
Prioritizing Capital Improvement Projects
Staff has evaluated every project quantified during the establishment and update of the
CIP and established Criteria justifications that are reflected on each project sheet.These
justification categories include:safety,support of essential City services,support of Council
plan goals,economy and efficiency,outside funding,and community quality/sustainability.
The Criteria justifications,or a combination of,as well as the availability of restricted (non-
General Fund)monies,are utilized to establish the priority level of CIP projects.Staff has
included columns on the Funded and Unfunded lists (pages 12 &66 of the document)to
indicate whether the project supports public safety or another City Council priority.
Legally Required Projects
Both the Funded and Unfunded lists include projects that address safety issues.
Prioritization of these projects is a risk management exercise.For example,upsizing a
sewer pipeline can reduce the risk of overflow that would result in mandated fines and
repairs.Although it is in the City's best interest to mitigate risk,the only projects in the CIP
that are legally required are those that improve the City's compliance with the Americans
with Disabilities Act (but no legal definition for the level of effort required);and the Storm
Water Quality projects as part of the City's MS4 permitting requirements.
Funding Considerations
In the past,Staff has recommended the funding of CIP projects based on the availability of
funding mechanisms,such as the availability of restricted revenues and accumulated
restricted funds,so as to be conservative with the allocation of general fund monies.This
is consistent with Government Finance Officers'Association's (GFOA)Best Practice that
states:
"When integrating plans with financial policies,governments should consider
both the costs and revenue streams.Possible revenue streams include bond
programs,pay as you go alternatives,grants,impact fees,and public private
partnership alternatives.Reviewing the revenue generating potential under
the plan assumptions will help identify the capability to finance needed
5-3
DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 1,2013
Page 4
capital projects as well as any gaps in the ability to do so.Moreover,the
plan's vision should be balanced between the financial capacities to meet the
stated goals,or at a minimum,should clearly identify the financial
implications of a vision that may conflict with the jurisdiction's financial
policies and capacity.,,1
However,now that the San Ramon Stabilization project has been partially funded with a
grant and the City's contribution will be funded with either the CIP Reserve or debt (or a
combination of the same),Staff and the City's Financial Advisor recommend that the City
Council plan for the use of the CIP Reserve for future project funding.
Projects Added To Funded List
The following projects were added to the 2013 CIP Five-Year Funded List based upon
priority,funding availability,and opportunities to combine projects for increased efficiency:
Buildings and other Facility Improvements
•Hesse Park Multi-Purpose Room Improvements
•Fiber Optic Cabling -Hesse Park/Ryan Park
•Fiber Optic Cabling -Abalone Cove Sewer Lift Stations/Shoreline Park/Ladera
Linda Park
•Ladera Linda Community Center Buildings Replacement
Roadway Infrastructure
•PVDS -East of Landslide
•PVDS Road Way Realignment and Drainage Project
•PVDE Bronco -Headland Safety Improvements
•PVDE Multi-Modal Improvements
Utility Undergrounding
•Crenshaw Boulevard Undergrounding
Landslide Mitigation Projects
•New Landslide Dewatering Wells (4)
Storm Water Quality Projects
•Drainage Area Monitoring System
•Storm Water Quality Regional Improvement Project
Sewer Projects
•Basswood Avenue
•West General Avenue
1 GFOA Best Practice "The Role of Master Plans in Capital Improvement Planning"(2008).
http://www.gfoa.org/i ndex.php?option=com content&task=view&id=1600
5-4
DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 1,2013
Page 5
•Abalone Cove
• Ironwood Street
•PVDS &Schooner Drive
•PVDS &Sea Cove Drive
•Ginger Root Lane
•Malaga Canyon
•Miscellaneous Projects
Recreation!Parks &Open Space
•Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Parking Lot Improvement
•Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Staff Building,Restrooms and Driveway
Improvements
•Hes,se Park Parking Lot Resurfacing
•PVIC Building Identification Sign/Screening Wall
•Ryan Park Parking Lot Expansion
•Salvation Army Trail
The CIP document provides full descriptions of each project.
The Hawthorne Blvd.median improvement (Via Rivera to City Hall)was moved from the
Funded list to the Unfunded list based on City Council direction on March 19,2013 and
April 30,2013.
Changes To The Unfunded List
The following projects were quantified and added to the 2013 CIP Unfunded List:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
•Citywide ADA Transition Plan Implementation
Roadway Infrastructure
•Hawthorne Boulevard Right of Way Beautification
•Hawthorne Boulevard Bike Lane Gap Closure
Storm Drain System
•Interim Altamira Canyon Drainage
•Paintbrush Canyon Drainage
Landslide Mitigation Projects
• Installation of New Dewatering Wells
•Rehabilitation of Dewatering Wells
•Instrument Wells
5-5
DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 1,2013
Page 6
Recreation!Parks &Open Space
•Restroom at Del Cerro Park
•Lower Point Vicente Park Improvements (Phase 1)
•Lower Hesse Park Improvements (Phase 1)
•Grandview Park Improvements (Phase 1)
The Unfunded section of the CIP document provides full descriptions for each project.
The new construction of City Hall and related Civic Center projects have been removed
from the Unfunded list pending further direction from the City Council.Staff expects that
further direction will be provided after the ad-hoc Subcommittee of the City Council for the
Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Master Plan develops alternatives.
Infrastructure Management Plan
The City's Financial Advisor,Tim Schaefer of Magis Advisors,has encouraged an overall
review of infrastructure replacement in conjunction with the City's ability to fund
replacement projects in the future.This overall review includes the development of an
Infrastructure Management Plan (referred to as the "IMP"until an appropriate name is
established)that would provide a long-term road map for the systematic
replacement/rehabilitation of the City's infrastructure.
The initiation of the IMP would begin with the preparation of an infrastructure condition
assessment (an Infrastructure "Report Card")by a consultant.The report card will provide
a basis for the development of a long-term infrastructure capital maintenance and
replacement/rehabilitation plan and funding plan.In contrast,the Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan is a mid-term view of quantified projects and funding sources.
On the City's books,infrastructure is carried at its historical cost of $157.5 million,less
$73.2 million of depreciation.About one-quarter of the infrastructure cost was estimated at
1973 value,when the City was incorporated and assets were transferred from the county.
Most of the infrastructure has estimated useful life ranging from 30 to 50 years.We can
roughly estimate the hypothetical replacement cost of this infrastructure with a simple
calculation.If the increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI)is applied to the historical
cost of the assets (average of 3.35%since 1973),then today's estimated replacement cost
is about $331 million.If this estimated replacement cost in nominal dollars is evenly
distributed over a 50 year period,the rate of infrastructure rehabilitation spending would be
about $6.6 million per year (or about 180%of the City's annual transit occupancy tax
revenue).The actual replacement cost of the City's infrastructure assets may be greater
than this hypothetical estimate.In addition,this hypothetical estimate does not provide for
any enhancements of infrastructure,only the rehabilitation of existing infrastructure.
Attachments:
Proposed 2013 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
5-6
Draft 2013
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
RAJiCHO PALOS VERDES
5-7
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
FUNDED PROJECTS 11
FIVE YEAR CIP FUNDED GRID 12
BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 13
INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY 20
ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE 22
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING 36
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 38
LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS 43
STORM WATER QUALITY 45
SEWER PROJECTS 48
RECREATION, PARKS & OPEN SPACE 58
UNFUNDED PROJECTS 65
UNFUNDED GRID 66
BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 67
INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY 73
ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE 74
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING 83
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 87
LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS 93
RECREATION, PARKS & OPEN SPACE 97
5-8
3
INTRODUCTION
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a guide toward the efficient and effective provision of public
infrastructure and facilities. Programming capital facilities and improvements over time can
promote better use of the City’s limited financial resources, reduce costs and assist in the
coordination of public and private development. In addition, the planning process is valuable as a
means of coordinating and taking advantage of joint planning and development of facilities and
infrastructure where possible. Careful management of these assets keeps the City poised for
flexible and responsive strategic planning that allows the City to proactively prepare the
groundwork for capital projects so when funding opportunities arise, a plan is ready to be
implemented. By looking beyond year-to-year budgeting and projecting what, where, when and
how capital investments should be made, capital planning enables public organizations to
maintain an effective level of service for the present and future population.
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP)
The result of this continuing planning process is the CIP, which is the City’s five-year plan for
infrastructure projects. The CIP addresses the City’s needs relating to the acquisition, expansion,
and rehabilitation of long-lived facilities and infrastructure. The CIP serves as a planning
instrument in conjunction with the City’s General Plan and the City Council’s Goals to identify
needed capital projects and coordinate the financing and timing of improvements in a way that
maximizes the return to the public. It provides a planned systematic approach to utilizing the
City’s limited financial resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service
and infrastructure needs. It serves as the “blueprint” for the future of the community and is a
management and planning tool, rather than a binding document.
The underlying strategy of the CIP is to plan for necessary land acquisition, construction and
maintenance of public facilities necessary for the safe and efficient provision of public services in
accordance with City policies and objectives adopted in the City’s General Plan. A critical
element of a balanced CIP is the provision of funds to both preserve or enhance existing facilities
and provide new assets to respond to changing needs and community growth. While the
program serves as a long range plan, it is reviewed and revised annually in conjunction with the
budget. Priorities may be changed due to funding opportunities or circumstances that propel a
project to a higher importance. Along the way, projects may be revised for significant costing
variances.
The CIP is primarily a document that assists in addressing the City’s long-term needs. As such,
the projects and their scopes are subject to change from year to year as the needs of the
community become more defined and projects move closer to final implementation. The adoption
of the CIP is neither a commitment to a particular project nor a limitation to a particular cost. As a
basic tool for scheduling anticipated capital projects, it is also a key element in planning and
controlling future capital financing. For this reason, the CIP includes some “unfunded” projec ts in
which needs have been qualified, but specific solutions and funding sources have not been
determined.
When adopted, the CIP provides the framework for the City’s management team and the City
Council with respect to investment planning, project planning and the managing of any debt. This
document is independent of the City Council’s goals and is intended to serve as a mid-term
planning document.
THE CIP PROCESS
The capital improvement plan and budget is the result of an ongoing infrastructure planning
process. Infrastructure planning decisions must be made with regard to both existing and new
facilities and equipment. For existing facilities, the planning process addresses appropriate
capital renewal strategies and repair-versus-replacement of facilities. New service demands are
also considered since they often affect capital facility requirements. Planning for the five-year
CIP period and subsequent years, includes linking the General Plan to the capital plan
5-9
4
requirements, conducting needs assessments and allowing for flexibility to take advantage of
opportunities for capital investment. The FY13-14 through FY17-18 CIP is developed through
input from professional staff, citizens of Rancho Palos Verdes, and elected or appointed City
officials.
CIP REVIEW TEAM
A CIP Review team is responsible for annually reviewing capital project requests and providing
recommendations to the City Manager. This team is comprised of staff from the Office of the City
Manager, Finance and Information Technology, Public Works, Community Development, and
Recreation and Parks departments, and the City Attorney. This team conducts an in-depth
analysis of the impact of the CIP on present and future cash flows and financial obligations, as
well as the City’s ability to finance, process, design, and ultimately maintain projects. The team
will also analyze the fiscal impact for each individual project; including future maintenance and
replacement costs, associated monetary benefits (e.g. future maintenance savings), as well as
any applicable future revenue opportunities. The team meets periodically throughout the year to
evaluate the progress of projects, and examine future needs of the City.
The overall goal of the CIP Review Team is to develop CIP recommendations that:
Preserve the past by investing in the continued upgrade of City assets and infrastructure;
Protect the present with improvements to City facilities and infrastructure;
Plan for the future.
Projects are identified by staff, professional consultants, residents and/or elected officials. There
are typically more proposals than can be funded in the five-year CIP period, so the team conducts
an internal project ranking process. The criteria used in this internal ranking includes, but is not
limited to, safety, support of essential City services, support of City Council’s goals, economy and
efficiency, outside funding committed (or eligible for), and community quality/sustainability.
Projects are prioritized based on the criteria outlined in this plan in the following section. If a
project receives a lower ranking, it just means that other projects in that period of time are more
critical for the City to address. While ratings are important in determining recommended projects,
the realities of the City’s financial situation are critical to all decisions.
CIP CRITERIA
Safety: Enhance or improve the overall safety of the City and delivery of services. Protect the
health and welfare of residents.
Supports Essential City Services: Maintenance and development of existing or new facilities and
infrastructure which allows the City to deliver essential services to residents of Rancho Palos
Verdes.
Supports City Council Goals: Supports the goals annually established by the City Council in the
CITY COUNCIL. Meets citywide long-term goals and is in compliance with the City’s General
Plan.
Economy and Efficiency: Maintain and enhance the economy and efficiency of providing services
in Rancho Palos Verdes. This criterion would include projects which improve business processes
and overall efficiency while also evaluating environmental impacts.
Outside Funding Committed or Eligible: Support a project which outside funding has been
committed to or may be obtained through restricted revenue sources.
Community Quality/Sustainability: Maintain and enhance the infrastructure and services which
supports our residential and business community. This criterion would include projects which
preserve and enhance the overall quality of life in Rancho Palos Verdes and projects which
ensure economic viability to support a sustainable community.
5-10
5
THE CIP CALENDAR
August-October Departments prepare CIP requests
November- January CIP Team reviews requests
February-May Recommendations developed to be included in the Five-Year
Model and Draft Budget
May-June Planning Commission Review
May-June Recommendations presented to the City Council for approval
Additional forms and methods of public outreach will be conducted as directed by the City
Council.
PROJECT LISTS
The CIP includes a comprehensive listing of all projects contained in the Five-Year Plan and also
projects beyond the five-year period. Detailed project sheets are contained in the plan for all
projects included in the CIP. Another list of unfunded projects is also contained in the plan to
highlight quantified projects beyond the five-year period. Projects which are included in the CIP
were evaluated based on the criteria approved by the City Council and are in compliance with the
goals set forth in the City’s General Plan. Application of these criteria ensures that each project
recommended for Council consideration does indeed s upport the policy objectives of the City’s
long-term planning documents and identifies a basis for scheduling and allocation of resources.
Cost estimates have been developed for each project based on preliminary project descriptions,
and include all estimated costs for land acquisition, permits and inspections, project management
and project engineering, consultant design, construction, utilities, information technology
infrastructure and other associated project fees. Estimates are in today’s dollars.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT POLICIES
Time Period
The Finance and Information Technology Department, in cooperation with all other City
Departments and the City Attorney, shall produce a working document designed to identify capital
needs annually in conjunction with the budget process. This Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) is submitted to the City Council to utilize in reviewing and prioritizing capital projects. After
adopted by Council during the budget process, the CIP becomes the City’s plan for capital
improvements for the next five years, adjusted annually.
Type of Project
Definitions
Capital asset: An asset with a cost in excess of $5,000 and an expected useful life of more than
one year, such as automobiles, equipment, and furniture. These items will continue to be
included in the operating budget. Items such as automobiles, minor equipment, and furniture will
continue to be accounted for and funded using the Equipment Replacement Fund and are not
included in the capital improvement plan.
Capital project: A project expected to have a useful life greater than ten years and an estimated
cost of $100,000 or more. Capital projects include the construction, acquisition, or major
5-11
6
renovation of buildings, roadways, utility systems, or other structures, purchase of land, and
major landscaping projects.
Projects meeting the above definition will be included in the CIP document in addition to the City’s
budget document. The information will be tied to the capital budget and totals for each project in
the CIP will be included in the capital budget.
Selecting the Projects for the CIP
The comprehensive capital project planning process has the following essential components:
The General Plan (Long-term Plan- 10 Years)
The Capital Improvement Plan (Mid-term Plan- 5 Years)
The Capital Budget (Short-term Plan- 1 Year)
City Council Goals (Long-term and Short-term evaluated each year)
All projects selected for the CIP should be consistent with the goals identified by the City Council
or as outlined in the City’s General Plan. The project selection process strives to achieve a
balanced plan for the community to include all necessary and high priority projects, while also
enhancing City services and facilities.
Operating Budget Impact Identified in the CIP
The operating impact of proposed capital projects, including personnel, operating expenditures,
capital outlay, and debt service, as applicable, will be identified in the CIP document and
considered in preparing the annual operating budget and Five-Year Financial Model.
Moving Projects from the CIP to the Capital Budget
All projects approved in the annual capital budget are appropriated at the estimated cost to
complete the project. At the end of each fiscal year, the remaining appropriation for uncompleted
portions of the project will be carried forward to subsequent fiscal years.
Staff will identify the estimated costs, potential funding sources, operating impact, and project
schedule for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to the City Council.
Staff will coordinate development of the capital improvement budget with the development of the
operating budget. All costs for internal professional services needed to implement the CIP will be
included in the capital budget as part of the budget document for the years the CIP is to be
implemented.
Cost tracking for components of the capital improvement program will be updated semi-annually
to ensure project completion against budget and established time lines.
Funding of the CIP Reserve Fund through Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT)
On April 19, 2011, the City Council adopted Policy No. 41 regarding the City’s Reserve Policies.
Within Policy No. 41, Council approved of a minimum $3 million reserve level, as well as the
transfer of the total annual TOT revenue into the CIP fund, which currently is approximately $3.6
million.
Definition of Capital Budget Year
A capital budget year runs concurrent to the operating budget fiscal year beginning July 1 st and
ending June 30th.
Types of Financing
The nature and cost of the project generally determines the financing options as do projected
revenue resources. The following financing instruments could be used in the following preferred
order:
5-12
7
Outside funding that does not require repayment, including grants, federal, state and
county restricted funding (i.e. transportation funding), and donations;
Developer Fees;
City restricted revenue imposed by voters (i.e. environmental excise tax, storm drain user
fee);
Accumulated Fund Balances in Restricted Funds;
General Fund;
Debt secured by a Restricted Revenue Source; and
General Obligation Debt.
Remaining Balances
It is the City’s policy to apply restricted funding sources after a project is completed and final cost
is identified, or at the close of each fiscal year, whichever occurs first.
Evaluation of Capital Projects
Capital project and program reviews are to monitor existing project performance and to update
the Five-Year CIP. Each project must be actively managed and semi-annual reports on the
physical and fiscal status of each project should be made available to the City Council in
conjunction with the budget adoption and Mid-Year Financial Review.
Green Building Standards
As a way to create a more sustainable way of life, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes requires the
incorporation of green building principles and practices into the design, construction, and
operation of all City facilities, and to evaluate all land purchases for future development on the
basis of reducing environmental impacts whenever feasible.
Standards for Maintenance
It is important to have standards in place for the various infrastructure systems throughout the
City to maintain this investment and be positioned to provide adequate services for the residents
of Rancho Palos Verdes. Staff will develop maintenance standards and schedules as
appropriate.
Contingency Policy
The need for contingencies will be evaluated with each project and be included in the CIP on a
case-by-case basis.
Project Change Orders
Project change orders will be made in accordance with the policy stated in Section 02.44 of the
Municipal Code. .
GENERAL PLAN GOALS
The goals stated below are included in the City’s General Plan which serves as the City’s long -
term strategic planning tool. All CIP projects should contribute to fulfilling one or more of the
goals listed below to create a balanced, sustainable community.
Natural Environment Element
It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect, and enhance its
natural resources, beauty, and open space for the benefit and enjoyment of its residents
and the residents of the entire region. Future development shall recognize the sensitivity
of the natural environmental and be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the
protection of it.
Socio/Cultural Element
The City shall strive to protect and preserve all significant archaeological, paleontological
and historical resources within the City.
5-13
8
Cultural Resources
The City shall strive to protect and preserve all significant archaeological, paleontological
and historical resources within the City.
Current Social, Service, and Cultural Organizations
Work toward a coordinated program to aid in matching the facility needs of the many and
diverse groups in the community with existing and future facility resources throughout the
City.
Social Services
Encourage programs for community involvement, participation, and action to minimize
the sense of isolation and powerlessness felt by many individuals in the community.
Encourage programs for recreation, social services, and cultural and educational
achievement.
Encourage a framework for interaction among the four cities of the peninsula and
between the peninsula and its surrounding communities to solve common problems.
Urban Environment Element
It is the goal of the City to carefully control and direct future growth towards making a
positive contribution to all elements of the community. Growth in Rancho Palos Verdes
should be a cautious, evolutionary process that follows a well-conceived set of general
guidelines which respond to both holding capacity limitations for the region and
environmental factors on the peninsula.
Activity Areas
It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to preserve and enhance the
community's quality living environment; to enhance the visual character and physical
quality of existing neighborhoods; and to encourage the development of housing in a
manner which adequately serves the needs of all present and future residents of the
community.
The City shall discourage industrial and major commercial activities due to the terrain and
environmental characteristics of the City. Commercial development shall be carefully and
strictly controlled, and limited to consideration of convenience or neighborhood service
facilities.
The City shall encourage the development of institutional facilities to serve the political,
social, and cultural needs of its citizens.
The City shall endeavor to provide, develop, and maintain recreational facilities and
programs of various types to provide a variety of activities for persons of all age groups
and in all areas of the community.
Agricultural uses within the City shall be encouraged, since they are desirable for
resource management and open space.
Infrastructure
It shall be a goal of the City to ensure adequate public utilities and communications
services to all residents, while maintaining the quality of the environment.
It shall be a goal of the City to provide residents with a safe and efficient system of roads,
trails and paths.
5-14
9
It shall be a goal of the City to encourage the increased mobility of residents through the
development of an adequate public transportation system.
Safety
It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of life and property from both
natural and man-made hazards within the community.
It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of the public through effective
law enforcement and fire protection programs.
It shall be a goal of the City to develop and enforce health and sanitation, emergency
communications, and disaster preparedness programs to ensure the overall health and
safety of all residents.
It shall be a goal of the City to protect life and property and reduce adverse economic,
environmental, and social impacts resulting from any geologic activity.
Sensory Environment
It shall be the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes through proper land use planning
and regulations, to provide for a quiet and serene residential community with a minimum
of restriction on citizen activity.
Palos Verdes peninsula is graced with views and vistas of the surrounding Los Angeles
basin and coastal region. Because of its unique geographic form and coastal resources,
these views and vistas are a significant resource to residents and too many visitors, as
they provide a rare means of experiencing the beauty of the peninsula and the Los
Angeles region. It is the responsibility of the City to preserve these views and vistas for
the public benefit and, where appropriate, the City should strive to enhance and restore
these resources, the visual character of the City, and provide and maintain access for the
benefit and enjoyment of the public.
Land Use Plan
It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to provide for land uses which will be
sensitive to and enhance the natural environment and character of the community, supply
appropriate facilities to serve residents and visitors, promote a range of housing types,
promote fiscal balance, and protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the
community.
Fiscal Element
It shall be a goal of the City to hold the property tax to a minimum and to continually
explore and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of alternate or new sources of
revenue.
It shall be a goal of the City to explore cooperative financing strategies that might be
undertaken in association with other jurisdictions.
It shall be a goal of the City to take maximum advantage of regulatory legislation to obtain
contributions, dedications and reservations (i.e., easements).
It shall be a goal of the City to ascertain that all revenues generated by growth are
sufficient to cover costs related to growth.
It shall be a goal of the City to thoroughly evaluate capital acquisition and operating
expenditures and their impacts before implementation of programs.
5-15
10
(THIS PAGE IS BLANK)
5-16
11
FUNDED PROJECTS
The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs
through various planning processes along with a proposed funding source.
Because the City Council approves CIP projects for the upcoming year, proposed
future funding sources could change in subsequent years.
5-17
12
R
a
n
c
h
o
P
a
l
o
s
V
e
r
d
e
s
F
i
v
e
Y
e
a
r
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
-
F
u
n
d
e
d
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
a
g
e
S
a
f
e
t
y
G
o
a
l
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
F
Y
1
3
-
1
4
F
Y
1
4
-
1
5
F
Y
1
5
-
1
6
F
Y
1
6
-
1
7
F
Y
1
7
-
1
8
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
O
t
h
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
1
3
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
A
D
A
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
X
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
EE
T
/
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
,
C
D
B
G
f
u
n
d
s
F
i
b
e
r
O
p
t
i
c
C
a
b
l
i
n
g
:
H
e
s
s
e
P
a
r
k
/
R
y
a
n
P
a
r
k
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
2
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
F
i
b
e
r
O
p
t
i
c
-
A
b
C
o
v
e
S
e
w
e
r
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
/
S
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
P
a
r
k
/
L
a
d
e
r
a
L
i
n
d
a
1
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
H
e
s
s
e
P
a
r
k
M
u
l
t
i
P
u
r
p
o
s
e
R
o
o
m
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
L
a
d
e
r
a
L
i
n
d
a
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
X
4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
In
t
a
n
g
i
b
l
e
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
O
u
t
l
a
y
2
0
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
U
p
d
a
t
e
X
X
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
a
c
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
e
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
2
2
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Z
o
n
e
9
X
X
1
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
,
T
D
A
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
3
f
u
n
d
s
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Z
o
n
e
2
&
6
X
X
2
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
,
T
D
A
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
3
f
u
n
d
s
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Z
o
n
e
7
X
X
1
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
,
T
D
A
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
3
f
u
n
d
s
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Z
o
n
e
8
X
X
1
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
,
T
D
A
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
3
f
u
n
d
s
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Z
o
n
e
3
&
4
X
X
2
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
,
T
D
A
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
3
f
u
n
d
s
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
-
M
i
r
a
l
e
s
t
e
D
r
i
v
e
X
X
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
6
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
R
,
P
r
o
p
A
,
P
r
o
p
C
,
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
-
C
r
e
n
s
h
a
w
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
X
X
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
7
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
R
,
P
r
o
p
A
,
P
r
o
p
C
,
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
-
I
n
d
i
a
n
P
e
a
k
R
o
a
d
X
X
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
R
,
P
r
o
p
C
,
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
P
V
D
S
-
E
a
s
t
E
n
d
o
f
L
a
n
d
s
l
i
d
e
X
X
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
P
V
D
E
B
r
o
n
c
o
-
H
e
a
d
l
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
X
4
1
,
7
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
3
0
0
$
H
S
I
P
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
(
9
0
/
1
0
)
P
V
D
S
R
o
a
d
W
a
y
R
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
X
X
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
5
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
P
V
D
E
M
u
l
t
i
M
o
d
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
x
x
3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
G
r
a
n
t
8
0
/
2
0
m
a
t
c
h
,
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
W
e
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
x
x
3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
-
5
0
c
o
s
t
s
h
a
r
e
,
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
3
6
C
r
e
n
s
h
a
w
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
R
u
l
e
2
0
A
f
u
n
d
s
S
t
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
3
8
S
t
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
L
i
n
i
n
g
X
X
3
2
9
,
8
8
1
$
3
3
5
,
2
7
8
$
3
4
0
,
8
3
6
$
3
4
7
,
6
5
3
$
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
W
Q
F
P
U
s
e
r
F
e
e
s
P
V
D
S
(
E
a
s
t
o
f
B
a
r
k
e
n
t
i
n
e
)
X
X
4
4
6
,
0
0
0
$
W
Q
F
P
U
s
e
r
F
e
e
s
S
o
u
t
h
H
a
w
t
h
o
r
n
e
/
V
i
a
F
r
a
s
c
a
t
i
X
X
4
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
W
Q
F
P
U
s
e
r
F
e
e
s
M
a
r
g
u
e
r
i
t
e
O
p
e
n
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
X
X
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
W
Q
F
P
U
s
e
r
F
e
e
s
L
a
n
d
s
l
i
d
e
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
4
3
N
e
w
L
a
n
d
s
l
i
d
e
D
e
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
g
W
e
l
l
s
(
2
)
X
X
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
S
t
o
r
m
W
a
t
e
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
4
5
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
A
r
e
a
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
S
y
s
t
e
m
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
S
t
o
r
m
W
a
t
e
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
S
e
w
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
4
8
B
a
s
s
w
o
o
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
X
X
1
1
4
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
W
e
s
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
X
X
1
2
2
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
A
b
a
l
o
n
e
C
o
v
e
X
X
5
6
7
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
Ir
o
n
w
o
o
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
X
X
2
4
7
,
2
7
5
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
P
V
D
S
a
t
S
c
h
o
o
n
e
r
D
r
i
v
e
X
X
6
0
3
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
P
V
D
S
a
t
S
e
a
C
o
v
e
D
r
i
v
e
X
X
1
9
9
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
G
i
n
g
e
r
R
o
o
t
L
a
n
e
X
X
2
0
3
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
M
a
l
a
g
a
C
a
n
y
o
n
X
X
4
0
7
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
M
i
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
X
X
$
4
6
5
,
0
0
0
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
,
P
a
r
k
s
,
a
n
d
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
5
8
A
b
a
l
o
n
e
C
o
v
e
S
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
3
2
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
,
Q
u
i
m
b
y
F
u
n
d
s
A
b
a
l
o
n
e
C
o
v
e
S
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
P
a
r
k
S
t
a
f
f
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
a
n
d
D
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
1
0
8
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
,
Q
u
i
m
b
y
F
u
n
d
s
H
e
s
s
e
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
R
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
i
n
g
1
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
,
Q
u
i
m
b
y
F
u
n
d
s
P
o
i
n
t
V
i
c
e
n
t
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
i
v
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
(
P
V
I
C
)
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
i
g
n
/
S
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
W
a
l
l
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
,
Q
u
i
m
b
y
F
u
n
d
s
R
y
a
n
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
E
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
X
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
,
Q
u
i
m
b
y
F
u
n
d
s
S
a
l
v
a
t
i
o
n
A
r
m
y
T
r
a
i
l
X
1
0
3
,
0
0
0
$
C
I
P
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
,
Q
u
i
m
b
y
F
u
n
d
s
T
o
t
a
l
s
9
,
0
8
2
,
8
5
6
$
1
0
,
7
4
5
,
2
7
8
$
6
,
8
4
1
,
1
3
6
$
5
,
4
9
2
,
6
5
3
$
1
2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5-18
13
BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Buildings and other facility improvements may include any proposed new City
facility or renovation or improvement of any existing City facilities. The City owns
and maintains twelve public buildings, including:
City Hall Administration Building at Upper Point Vicente Park
City Hall Community Development Building at Upper Point Vicente Park
City Hall trailer leased by Palos Verdes on the Net at Upper Point Vicente
Park
City Hall Emergency Communications Center trailer at Upper Point
Vicente Park
Fred Hesse Jr. Community Center Building
Pointe Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC) at Lower Point Vicente Park
Robert Ryan Park Building
Ladera Linda Community Center Buildings (5)
Cable Television Building Studio
Except for PVIC, these buildings are 25 years old or older and showing the signs
of daily use. Many of the facilities were purchased from the school district or
transferred to the City from the federal government, and little to no improvements
have been made since their acquisition. It is important to perform adequate
maintenance to extend the life of these facilities. It will be necessary to renovate
these buildings as they age to meet the needs of the community and ensure that
all building and safety guidelines are satisfied. PVIC, the most recently
remodeled City facility, was built in 1984 and expanded in 2005. The City Hall
buildings and Ladera Linda Community Center buildings are the best examples
of buildings that are in great need of renovation to meet organizational needs,
comply with safety and code requirements, and comply with all Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines. The projects listed on the following pages have
been developed based on individual staff assessments, input from the
community and professional consultants’ assessments and studies.
In November 2010, the City’s consultants completed a Civic Center Facilities
Assessment, which offered alternatives and general cost estimates for building
improvements to serve municipal functions, as well as optional public amenities
with a view to the long-term needs of the City. The alternatives identified range
widely from a “no-frills” structural, HVAC and ADA retrofit to the existing
administration facility--to newly-constructed civic facilities which could incorporate
community-serving amenities (public meeting rooms, community center, etc.). In
light of competing CIP demands, the City Council has directed Staff to focus on
cost-effective renovation of existing City Hall buildings. Therefore, the full-
expansion, new construction alternative is not included in the Unfunded List. The
City Council ad-hoc subcommittee for the Upper Point Vicente/Civic Center
Master Plan is working with Staff on a critical needs assessment, including the
seismic retrofit of City Hall buildings, improvements to address ADA compliance
5-19
14
throughout the campus, as well as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning. Once
those projects are fully considered by the Council, the project description and
associated costs will be incorporated in accordance with Council’s direction into
the CIP schedule.
5-20
15
PROJECT: CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Various
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
The Citywide ADA Transition Plan identifies projects with total cost
estimates of $11.8 million. This estimate includes $2.6 million of
roadway curb ramps and bus stops to be addressed with future
roadway projects; $1.7 million of access improvements at Ladera
Linda to be addressed with any future rehabilitation of the Ladera
Linda Community Center; and $1.3 million of access
improvements at the Civic Center to be addressed with any future
rehabilitation of the City Hall campus.
The remaining $6.2 million of identified projects are to improve
ADA compliance at various other City-owned properties. The
projects totaling $1.3 million scheduled for the next five years are
from this list, and address issues categorized as “potential hazard”
and “severe”. The remaining $4.9 million of this list, as well as the
amounts noted above for roadways, Ladera Linda, and the Civic
Center remain unfunded.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $35,000 $35,000 $17,500 $10,000 $10,000
CONSTRUCTION $365,000 $365,000 $282,500 $140,000 $140,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $400,000 $400,000 200,000 150,000 150,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Source: The CIP Reserve funded with General Fund Money, EET and CDBG grants.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-21
16
PROJECT: FIBER OPTIC CABLING: HESSE/RYAN
PARK
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Hesse Park/Ryan Park
DEPARTMENT: Finance and Information Technology
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the installation of fiber optic cabling for the
City’s phone and information network between City facilities within
the public right-of-way which will run adjacent to Ryan Park and
directly on to Hesse Park.
To reduce costs, this project will be strategically aligned with the
Hawthorne Traffic Signal Synchronization Project that will begin in
2013 to take advantage of the asphalt being dug up from the other
project. Vaults will be placed adjacent to the roadway within the
public right-of-way.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $60,000
CONSTRUCTION $260,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $60,000 $260,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-22
17
PROJECT:
FIBER OPTIC CABLING: ABALONE
COVE SEWER LIFT STATIONS/
SHORELINE PARK/LADERA LINDA
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Ladera Linda/Abalone Cove Shoreline Park
DEPARTMENT: Finance and Information Technology
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the installation of fiber optic cabling for unified
communications and data transmission between remote City park
and infrastructure facilities and the Civic Center administration
facility. It is essential to establish communications to Abalone Cove
Shore Line Park, the Abalone Cove Sewer Lift Stations and Ladera
Linda Park. Improved connectivity with Ladera Linda is essential to
provide full communication services to the eastside community park
in conjunction with its rehabilitation. The entire fiber optic run could
occur by a combination of aerial and underground line placement.
The project includes running a single line of f iber optic cabling on its
own network from City Hall to Abalone Cove Shoreline Park,
Abalone Cove Sewer lift stations and on to Ladera Linda Park, with
the cost of approximately $1.6M. The work would entail installing
24-48 strand fiber in 3” conduit within the public right of way along
Palos Verdes Drive South by either open cut or boring construction
methods.
Due to challenges with running fiber through the landslide area, the
option of leasing fiber from an Internet Service Provider between the
Civic Center and Ladera Linda will be included in the scope of the
project. Cox Communications currently has fiber that connects to
users along the road adjacent to Ladera Linda.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $1,600,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,600,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-23
18
PROJECT: HESSE PARK MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE: Maintenance/Upgrade
LOCATION: Hesse Park
DEPARTMENT: RPVTV
DESCRIPTION:
The Hesse Park Multi-Purpose Room is used for City Council
meetings, Planning Commission meetings as well as numerous
other uses that are broadcast on public television. The lighting,
the background, and the cameras need to be replaced to make
these public meetings more visually appealing. The new cameras
would be High Definition (HD) and would require full HD
integration of the directors booth or production control (the black
room). This would require an upgrade including, but not limited to,
an audio mixer, HD remote camera cables, digital video switcher,
live video feed distribution computer, on air graphics computer,
digital back up system and DVD burners.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $250,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $250,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-24
19
PROJECT: LADERA LINDA PARK & COMMUNITY
CENTER BUILDINGS REPLACEMENT
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Ladera Linda Park
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The initial stage of this project, for which a budget is appropriated,
is to create a master plan which will lay the groundwork for the
site’s long-term redevelopment and phased implementation. This
stage involves a study of community needs through public
outreach along with contemplating the City’s needs for public
service facilities. This work will be followed by programming,
quantifying the needs, planning and preparing a feasibility report
to create a master plan which can be phased for design and
construction.
The cost calculation for Ladera Linda Buildings Replacement
project is based on an estimated need for 12,000 square-feet of
buildings to replace the existing 18,000 square-feet. The
anticipated square footage can cover park restrooms, a staff
building, multipurpose room, activity rooms, discovery room and a
Park Ranger/Deputy Sheriff drop-in office. Other improvements
include park grounds landscaping & irrigation, picnic tables,
benches and an emergency generator. The project can be divided
in three phases. The first phase will include Hazmat abatement,
removal of all buildings, installation of all utility infrastructures, the
construction of 6,000 SF of new building, park grounds,
landscaping & improvements. The second and third phase will
include 3,000 SF of new buildings each.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $4,000,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $4,000,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
Phase I - $4 Million in CIP Reserves
Total Cost: $7.2 Million
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-25
20
INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY
Intangible Capital Outlay improvements may not have significant physical
substance, but they have more than minimal value and help the City in improving
operations or planning for the future. Projects that could be classified as
intangible capital outlay include the update or development of major planning
processes and documents, significant software purchases that may improve the
efficiency of business processes or large technology purchases that may improve
or enhance service delivery to citizens. This category includes an update to the
Pavement Management Program.
5-26
21
PROJECT: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
UPDATE
TYPE: Intangible Capital Outlay
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Pavement Management System (PMS) is updated every three
years to evaluate the condition of the City’s roadway system and to
identify Citywide Arterial Rehabilitation and Residential
Rehabilitation projects. The Metropolitan Transit Authority (Metro)
requires the PMS update in order for the City to continue receiving
Proposition C monies.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $120,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $120,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-27
22
ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE
Roadway infrastructure is one of the most widely used major capital investments
of a municipality. Without a well-maintained street system, the transportation
needs of the public, business, industry and government cannot be met. The
roads are also part of a critical public safety need, as they contribute to the
general health and welfare of the community. Maintaining quality roadway
infrastructure is also important for maintaining property values. It has been
shown that property values tend to suffer from adjacent poorly maintained
streets. Roadway infrastructure includes residential streets, arterial streets and
traffic safety improvements. In the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, there are 33.68
miles of arterial streets, 6.46 miles of collector streets and 103.31 miles of
residential streets. The total for all streets and alleys mileage is 143.44
centerline miles.
To manage the City’s residential and arterial streets, the City hires a consultant
that completes a full-detailed assessment of all streets every three years. This
report, known as the Pavement Management System, helps to identify any
serious issues and provides the City with a rating for each street. The report
includes the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The City of Rancho Palos
Verdes maintains a minimum standard for PCI for a municipal street system at
80. The City’s current PCI is 84.2 based upon the PMS report prepared by
Willdan & Associates in 2009. Since 1997, the City has maintained a pavement
rating between 80 and 90. The report also helps in defining a schedule to
complete the work. The City has been divided into nine zones for residential
streets, but in the case of some areas, zones may be completed together in one
year for added efficiency.
5-28
23
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zone 9
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS), Zone 9
of the residential rehabilitation program is scheduled for
implementation during the FY13-14 budget cycle. This project will
include micro-surfacing, slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root
removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks
in Zone 9. This infrastructure enhancement will also include
updating traffic signs, striping, curb painting and house numbering.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $1,900,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,900,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 for $26,586
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY13-14. This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 87
percent or higher.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 9: Composed of streets on the eastern side of
the City including neighborhoods such as Eastview,
South Eastview, Peninsula Verde and Rolling Hills
Riviera.
5-29
24
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zone 2 & 6
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS), Zone 2
& 6 of the residential rehabilitation program are scheduled for
implementation during the FY14-15 budget cycle. This project will
include slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root removals and ADA
compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zones 2 & 6.
This infrastructure enhancement will also include updating traffic
signs, striping, curb painting and house numbering.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $2,100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY14-15. This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 87
percent or higher.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 2: Residential streets in the northwestern part
of the City between Crest Road and Grayslake Road,
east and west of Hawthorne Blvd.
Zone 6: Residential streets in the southern part of the
City encompassing all neighborhoods to the east of
Point Vicente Park and west of Trump National
including Crestmont, Tramonto, Seaview, Barkentine,
Seacove, Wayfarer’s Chapel, the Landslide Zone and
Portuguese Bend neighborhoods.
5-30
25
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zone 7
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS), Zone
7 of the residential rehabilitation program is scheduled for
implementation during the FY15-16 budget cycle. This project will
include micro-surfacing, slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root
removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and
sidewalks in Zone 7. This infrastructure enhancement will also
include updating traffic signs, striping, curb painting and house
numbering.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $1,800,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,800,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY15-16. This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 87
percent or higher.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 7: The Ladera Linda community, Ganado
Area, streets near Mira Catalina School, San
Ramon and Calle Aventura.
5-31
26
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zone 8
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS), Zone 8
of the residential rehabilitation program is scheduled for
implementation during the FY16-17 budget cycle. This project will
include micro-surfacing, slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root
removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks
in Zone 8. This infrastructure enhancement will also include
updating traffic signs, striping, curb painting and house numbering.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $1,800,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,800,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY16-17. This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 87
percent or higher.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 8: Residential neighborhoods off of Palos
Verdes Drive East in the northern and eastern parts
of the City. .
/
5-32
27
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zone 3 & 4
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS),
Zones 3 & 4 of the residential rehabilitation program is scheduled
for implementation during the FY17-18 budget cycle. This project
will include micro-surfacing, slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root
removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and
sidewalks in Zones 3 & 4. This infrastructure enhancement will
also include updating traffic signs, striping, curb painting and
house numbering.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $2,100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY17-18. This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 85
percent or higher.
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 3: Residential streets north of Silverspur Rd
and east of Hawthorne Blvd, including the
Blackhorse community, Silver Arrow, Longhill and
Beechgate
Zone 4: Residential streets bordering Crenshaw
Blvd and Crest Road, including the Sea Crest, Sea
Breeze, Island View, and Ridgecrest communities
5-33
28
PROJECT:
ARTERIAL REHABILITATION –
MIRALESTE DRIVE
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Miraleste Drive
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS),
Miraleste Drive arterial will be resurfaced. The project will include
milling and overlay, roadway patching, crack filling, curb and gutter
repair, sidewalk repair and ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $70,000 $2,630,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $70,000 $2,630,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Proposition C, Proposition A, Measure R and CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-34
29
PROJECT: ARTERIAL REHABILITATION –
CRENSHAW BLVD
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd.
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS),
Crenshaw Blvd. arterial will be resurfaced. The project will include
milling and overlay, roadway patching, crack filling, curb and gutter
repair, sidewalk repair and ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $70,000 $2,730,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $70,000 $2,730,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Proposition C, Measure R and CIP Reserves
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-35
30
PROJECT: ARTERIAL REHABILITATION – INDIAN
PEAK ROAD
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Indian Peak Road
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS),
Indian Peak Road arterial will be resurfaced. The project will
include milling and overlay, roadway patching, crack filling, curb
and gutter repair, sidewalk repair and ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $1,500,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve and Measure R funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-36
31
PROJECT: PVDS - EAST END OF LANDSLIDE
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project will realign the east end of the landslide road along
PVDS to correct for the land movement that has taken place over
the past several years. The left and right turning deflections within
the traveled way will be removed and the roadway will be moved
back into the right-of-way along the eastern 800 feet of the
landslide road.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $50,000
CONSTRUCTION $450,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project will correct the unsafe condition that has developed at the east end of the landslide road. The
roadway in this area has migrated onto the Palos Verdes Bay Club property; the realignment will correct this
problem as well.
Construction estimate is approximately $450,000 due to the addition of the Gateway parking lot and
mitigation required for a fissure in the project area.
5-37
32
PROJECT:
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT
BRONCO DRIVE
TYPE: Traffic Improvements
LOCATION: PVDE @ Bronco Drive
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve portions of PVDE to provide wider travel lanes in each
direction, a shared use equestrian and pedestrian path located
behind the existing guardrail, a high visibility equestrian crossing
at Bronco Drive complete with flashing beacons, augmented
crossing signage and advanced crossing signage with flashing
beacons, installation of safety barriers and railing to reduce vehicle
collisions and cross-over accidents
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $41,700
CONSTRUCTION $500,300
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $41,700 $500,300
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Staff attained an HSIP grant that entails a 10% local match from CIP Reserve. The total project cost is
$542,000 with a local match of $487,800.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
LOCATION PHOTO MAP
5-38
33
PROJECT: PVDS ROAD WAY REALIGNMENT
AND DRAINAGE PROJECT
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: PVDS
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The PVDS Roadway Realignment project and the Ski Jump
Drainage project would be designed through this project. The
project would aid in the passive drainage of runoff that is now
trapped due to ground movement and re-align approximately 1.6
miles of Palos Verdes Drive South which is located within and
traverses the Abalone Cove, Portuguese Bend, and Klondike
Canyon Landslides. The location of the roadway is constantly
moving as the sub-soils within the landslide move. Extensive
grading is needed to re-establish (relocate) the roadway within the
right-of-way. The preliminary estimated design cost for these
projects are $245,000, with construction costs of $3,510,000.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $245,000
CONSTRUCTION $3,510,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $245,000 $3,510,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Design for the PVDS re-alignment and drainage project is required in FY 13 -14 to accommodate the needed
roadway alignment and drainage project in FY 14-15.
5-39
34
PROJECT: PVDE MULTI-MODAL IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: PVDE (Various Locations)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the Palos Verdes Drive East Preliminary Study, the
report concluded that implementation of four (4) priority projects will
help achieve a multi-modal status.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $3,200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $3,200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Staff attained an 80/20 grant. The City’s local match of $640,000 will be funded through the CIP Reserve
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Report Findings
Consider installing bicycle shared lane markings
(sharrows).South of Miraleste Dr. to Via Frascati9
To provide continuity, widen to provide sidewalks and
bike lanes
The bend west of Horseshoe Ln to
Headland Dr. & Miraleste Dr. to south of
Miraleste Dr.
8
Narrow the travel lanes/widen the roadway to provide
bike lanesSwitchbacks7
Widen to provide sidewalks and bike lanes
Study the intersections at Via Subida & La Vista Verde
Dr. to improve visibility and access
Via Subida/La Vista Verde Dr. & Via
Frascati to Diamonte Ln.6
Conduct a study to determine the most appropriate
improvements along the 4-lane segment and at Ganado
Drive.
Marymount College/Ganado Dr.5
Install a high visibility equestrian crossing when
funding is receivedIntersection at Bronco Drive4
Widen PVDE to provide/upgrade equestrian/pedestrian
paths and bike lanesDeadman’s Curve3
Study the intersection of PVDE and Miraleste to
determine appropriate improvements
Widen PVDE to provide sidewalks, equestrians paths,
and bike lanes, and high-visibility crosswalks at Via
Cañada
Bronco Drive to Miraleste Drive2
Widen PVDE to upgrade/provide equestrian/pedestrian
path and bike lanesHeadland Drive to Bronco Drive1
PROPOSED ACTIONSECTION OF PVDEPRIORITY
5-40
35
PROJECT:
WESTERN AVENUE TRAFFIC
IMPROVEMENTS (2007 WESTERN AVE.
CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN)
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Western Avenue
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Western Avenue Task Force group was formed consisting of
RPV, City LA, and Caltrans. Since its inception, the working group
completed a Western Avenue Corridor Study which is a strategic
action plan that:
• Identified the current and future deficiencies in the multi-modal
transportation system within the corridor
• Recommended consensus-based solutions (including required
strategies) to address the deficiencies.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION 3,200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL 3,200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
50-50 sharing agreement with City contribution coming from CIP Reserve.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
WESTERN CORRIDOR
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
5-41
36
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING
Pursuant to a formula set out in Tariff Rule 20A by the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC), Southern California Edison is required to set aside an
annual amount for the purpose of undergrounding electrical utilities within each
city. To qualify, cities must determine that
Undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy concentration
of overhead electric facilities
The street or road or right-of-way is extensively used by the general public
and carries a high volume of pedestrian or vehicle traffic.
The street, road or right-of-way adjoins or passes through a civic area or
public recreation area or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general
public.
The street or road or right-of-way is considered an arterial street or major
collector as defined in the Governor's Office of Planning and Research
General Plan Guidelines.
Under the tariff, allocations not committed to a qualifying project in one year are
carried over to the next year. Annually, the City receives approximately $80,000
in Rule 20A funds. As of May 2012, the City’s Rule 20A fund balance was
$839,749. In 2009, the CPUC amended the code to allow for governments to
“mortgage” their current year’s allocation up to an additional five years in order to
able to undertake a qualifying Rule 20A project sooner than otherwise possible.
The following project(s) has been identified that meet the criterion for the usage
of Rule 20A funds and would benefit the City as whole.
5-42
37
PROJECT: CRENSHAW BLVD UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd at Crest Road
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The project will underground overhead utility lines along Crenshaw
Blvd south of Crest Road. This project qualifies for Rule 20A
funding.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $120,000
CONSTRUCTION $1,080,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget. This project is entirely funded by Rule 20A funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-43
38
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
In June 2004, the City’s consulting engineers prepared an Update to the Storm
Drain Master Plan. The updated plan identified serious storm drain deficiencies
that required significant repair. The update identified 38 high-priority projects,
which were the basis for establishing a “user fee.” Since then, some projects
have been completed, and others have been reassessed to meet changing
priorities and needs. The 38 projects have been reevaluated resulting in
grouping the projects into 12 project areas. These are based on identifiable
drainage areas/systems, most of which are tied to natural canyon drainage
systems. Each project has been grouped into a project area. The areas are as
follows:
Area 1: Sunnyside Ridge
Area 2: McCarrell Canyon Storm Drain System
Area 3: Lower San Ramon Canyon/Tarapaca Canyon
Area 4: Altamira Canyon
Area 5: Palos Verdes Drive East/Miraleste Canyon
Area 6: San Pedro and Averill Canyons
Area 7: Via Colinita Vickery Canyon
Area 8: Miraleste and Chandeleur
Area 9: Palos Verdes Drive East Switchbacks
Area 10: Hawthorne Boulevard
Area 11: Palos Verdes Drive South
Area 12: Citywide Storm Drain Programs
5-44
39
PROJECT: STORM DRAIN LINING
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 12
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
All CMP storm drain lines within the City have reached their design
life expectancy and need to be lined to extend their life another
30+ years. CMP dating back to the 1940s have been discovered
and require maintenance along with those most recently insta lled
in the 1970s. A large number of drainage problems citywide can
be overcome by relining deteriorated pipes and improving inlets
and outlet structures.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $329,881 $335,278 $340,836 $347,653
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $329,881 $335,278 $340,836 $347,653
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: WQFP user fees. Ongoing maintenance costs should decrease, as pipes
which have been lined generally require less maintenance resulting in a cost savings. Because the Storm
Drain User Fee sunsets in FY15-16, funding sources will have to be identified to fund further storm drain lining
projects
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
LOCATION PHOTO MAP
5-45
40
PROJECT: PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH (EAST
OF BARKENTINE)
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 11
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project area includes several storm drain systems that cross
Palos Verdes Drive South at various locations. Drainage capacity
will be increased with improvement to inlets and outlet structures.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $446,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $446,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: WQFP user fees
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-46
41
.
PROJECT:
SOUTH HAWTHORNE/VIA FRASCATI
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 10
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project will improve drainage across Hawthorne Boulevard by
replacing two existing 18” pipes with one 24” and one 30” RCP
pipes. Additionally, a second location on South Hawthorne will be
evaluated after episodes of flooding in recent years. A curb and
gutter project on Via Frascati will serve to direct drainage into the
street and existing catch basins, which drain into the San Pedro
Canyon.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION 440,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL 440,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: WQFP user fees
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-47
42
PROJECT: MARGUERITE OPEN CHANNEL
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Between PVDW and the Bluff
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
Staff has become aware of excessive erosion in a portion of open
natural drainage channel, which connects two piped systems
between PVDW and the bluff. Studies of the issue are scheduled
for FY 12-13 with implementation of any recommendations for
improvement tentatively scheduled the following year.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $350,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $350,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: WQFP user fees
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING
COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY
QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-48
43
LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS
The City’s Landslide Mitigation Projects refers to projects that lessen the effect of
erosion on the Portuguese Bend Landslide, which is continuously active landslide
in the United States.
5-49
44
PROJECT: INSTALLATION OF LANDSLIDE
DEWATERING WELLS (2)
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Dewatering Wells are a high priority and are considered to be the
next most effective method of minimizing runoff from entering the
landslide, which helps slow land movement within the landslide.
All runoff that percolates into the ground eventually becomes part
of the groundwater and will cause an increase in the depth of the
groundwater table. Removing groundwater through dewatering
wells helps to lower the groundwater table, relieving soil pressures
at depth and minimizing the negative effects groundwater has on
the landslide. Three new upslope wells in Portuguese Bend and
two new wells in Abalone Cove are initially planned during this
phase of the system’s expansion. These new wells should
improve the system’s effectiveness by increasing the system’s
water removal capacity and by removing water more rapidly. Two
new dewatering well projects should be scheduled annually until
the five have been installed. The cost to install each well is
estimated to be $85,000.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $170,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $170,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-50
45
STORM WATER QUALITY
In order to comply with the new MS4 Permit requirements, the Peninsula cities
are working together to address storm water quality issues by developing an
Enhanced Watershed Management Plan, including the development of a
structural treatment project and to monitor water quality in storm drain outfalls in
both dry and wet weather. To meet data standards, it is anticipated that
automated data collection systems will need to be designed and installed in
several locations in the various watersheds of the City.
5-51
46
PROJECT: DRAINAGE AREA MONITORING
SYSTEM
TYPE: Stormwater Quality Project
LOCATION: City wide, at storm drain outfalls
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In response to a new MS4 permit requirement, the City will need to
monitor water quality in storm drain outfalls in both dry and wet
weather. To meet data standards, it is anticipated that automated
data collection systems will need to be designed and installed in
several locations in the various watersheds of the City.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN 50,000 50,000
CONSTRUCTION 150,000 200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT 50,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $200,000 $300,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is required as part of the MS4 Permit
5-52
47
PROJECT: STORM WATER QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TYPE: Stormwater Quality Project
LOCATION: TBD
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In order to comply with the new MS4 Permit requirements, the
Peninsula cities will work together to address storm water quality
issues by developing an Enhanced Watershed Management Plan,
including the development of a structural treatment project. This is
an estimate of the City’s share of the cost to build a Storm Water
Quality improvement project. The project must be built within 30
months of receipt of the water quality monitoring results.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION 50,000
ENGINEERING/DESIGN 50,000 50,000
CONSTRUCTION 100,000 200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT 50,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $200,000 $300,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Required as part of MS4 Permit Enhanced Watershed Management Plan. Location to be determined once
pollutant monitoring studies are underway.
5-53
48
SEWER PROJECTS
The City’s sanitary sewer system is essential for City operations, yet it has not
required significant expenditures in past years due to an inter-local agreement
with Los Angeles County for maintenance activities. The City owns the system,
but the County has the primary responsibility for ongoing maintenance. The
County collects a sewer fee from the City’s property owners that Staff believes is
inadequate to maintain the system. Although the County maintains the City’s
sewer system, the City retains responsibility for its operation, public safety and
welfare. The City, not the County, maintains legal and regulatory responsibility
(i.e. any state or federal fines resulting from spillage).
In preparation for this change, the City conducted a survey of the system, and in
2004 the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan was created to help in the management of
this asset. The study examined sample areas throughout the City and assessed
the overall system as “fair.” The inspection revealed root intrusion in the pipes
and cracking in the pipes, in addition to accumulated fats and grease clogging
certain areas. It appeared that the County had not been performing adequate
maintenance over the years. Without regular maintenance, overflows due to root
and grease blockages will occur. To minimize the potential for overflow and to
restore and maintain the system in “good” condition, a significant investment in
pipeline inspection, repair and maintenance is required. The projects identified
herein were included in the City’s Wastewater Master Plan Update which was
completed in 2009. The City’s desire to contribute to a more proactive approach
to maintenance of the City’s sewer system was originally funded in FY07 -
08. The program account for the cost of updating the Sewer System Master
Plan, industrial waste monitoring, filming, and investigating, cleaning sewer
pipes, and addressing capacity issues throughout the City. Not only does this
work enable the City to propose capital improvement projects to the County and
perform small crack repair discovered during pipe filming, any roots or
obstructions discovered during the video inspections are removed which
minimizes the opportunity for overflows
5-54
49
PROJECT: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT-
BASSWOOD AVENUE
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City’s sewer system has been determined to be
under capacity. This project will replace 564 feet of 8 inch sewer
pipe. The pipe will be replaced with a 12 inch vitrified clay
pipeline. The pipeline runs along Basswood Avenue between
Mossbank Drive and Shorewood Road. This section of pipeline is
over capacity when analyzed considering the factor of safety and
PCAP rating.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $10,000
CONSTRUCTION
$99,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $5,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $114,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-55
50
PROJECT: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT-
WEST GENERAL STREET
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City’s sewer system has been determined to be
under capacity. This project will replace 560 feet of 8 inch sewer
pipe. The pipe will be replaced with a 12 inch vitrified clay
pipeline. The pipeline runs on West General Street between
Bernice Drive and West Crestwood Street. This section of pipeline
is over capacity when analyzed considering the factor of safety
flow run.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $17,000
CONSTRUCTION $98,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $7,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $122,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-56
51
PROJECT: ABALONE COVE SEWER SYSTEM
PROJECTS
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Water Board requirements mandate the City prepare a Sewer
System Management Plan for the Abalone Cove Sewer System –
estimated cost is $80,000. Three Pump Stations in the Abalone
Cove area need to be modified to allow the use of more reliable
pumps estimated cost is $65,000 each. Approximately 300 feet of
braided stainless steel low pressure line needs to be
repaired/replaced at an approximate cost of $30,000. Forty
manholes throughout the system need cleaning and to be lined
using a mastic treatment at a cost of approximately $80,000.
Approximately fifty low pressure grinder pumps are used
throughout the system to aid in overcoming grade differences.
These grinder pumps are nearing (or are at) the end of their useful
lives. Replacing each pump is estim ated to cost $2,000 – the total
grinder pump budget need is $100,000. The project will also
require $60,000 in design and $22,000 for project management.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $60,000
CONSTRUCTION $485,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $22,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $567,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Project Costs are based on similar projects performed within the Abalone Cove System.
Estimated Cost: $567,000
5-57
52
PROJECT: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT-
IRONWOOD STREET
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City’s sewer system has been determined to be
under capacity. This project will replace 930 feet of 8 inch sewer
pipe which does not have the hydraulic capacity to accommodate
existing flows. The pipe will be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified
clay pipe. The pipeline runs partly along Ironwood Street and runs
through the easement along Silver Spur Road. This reach of
pipeline is given a high priority ranking due the assigned PACP
rating of 5 and it is over capacity for existing, future and factor of
safety flow conditions.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $35,000
CONSTRUCTION $202,275
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $10,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $247,275
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 1 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the
plan.
5-58
53
PROJECT: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT-
PVDS at SCHOONER
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City’s sewer system has been determined to be
under capacity. This project will replace 2,377 feet of 8 AND 10
inch sewer pipes which do not have the hydraulic capacity to
accommodate existing flows. The pipes will be replaced with an
18 inch vitrified clay pipeline. The pipeline runs along Palos
Verdes Drive South between Conqueror Drive and Schooner
Drive. 25% of this pipeline is over capacity for existing flow
conditions and 50
% of the pipeline is over capacity for future flow conditions.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $65,000
CONSTRUCTION $517,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $21,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $603,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 2 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the
plan.
5-59
54
PROJECT: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT-
PVDS at SEA COVE
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City’s sewer system has been determined to be
under capacity. This project will replace 748 feet of 8 inch sewer
pipe which does not have the hydraulic capacity to accommodate
existing flows. The pipe will be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified
clay pipeline. The pipeline runs along Palos Verdes Drive Sout h
between Sea Cove Drive and Abalone Cove Shoreline Park. This
section of pipeline is over capacity for existing flow conditions.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $29,000
CONSTRUCTION $163,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $7,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $199,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 3 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the
plan.
5-60
55
PROJECT: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT-
GINGER ROOT LANE
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City’s sewer system has been determined to be
under capacity. This project will replace 952 feet of 8 inch sewer
pipe. The pipe will be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified clay
pipeline. The pipeline runs along Ginger Root Lane between
Narcissa Drive and Cinnamon Lane. This section of pipeline is
over capacity when analyzed considering the factor of safety flow
run.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $29,000
CONSTRUCTION $166,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $8,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $203,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 7 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the
plan.
5-61
56
PROJECT: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT-
MALAGA CANYON
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City’s sewer system has been determined to be
under capacity. This project will replace 1,850 feet of 10 inch
sewer pipe. The pipe will be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified clay
pipeline. The pipeline runs behind properties in Malaga Canyon
parallel to Basswood Avenue between Mossbank Drive and Mazur
Drive. This section of pipeline is over capacity when analyzed
considering the factor of safety flow run.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $59,000
CONSTRUCTION $335,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $13,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $407,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 5 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the
plan.
5-62
57
PROJECT: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT-
MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
TYPE: Sewer System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Several smaller locations throughout the City require repairs.
These sections of the City’s sewer system have been determined
to be under capacity. These projects will replace 1,951 feet of 8
inch sewer pipe. The pipes will be replaced with 12 inch vitrified
clay pipelines. The pipelines are located in several locations
throughout the City.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $75,000
CONSTRUCTION $340,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $50,000
LEGAL
TOTAL $465,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 8 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the
plan.
5-63
58
RECREATION, PARKS & OPEN SPACE
The development and maintenance of community parks, recreational areas and
open space has been established as a top priority for the City as stated in the
General Plan and various other planning documents. The General Plan states,
“It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect and
enhance its natural resources, beauty and open space for the benefit and
enjoyment of its residents and the residents of the entire region. Future
development shall recognize the sensitivity of the natural environment and
be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the protection of it.”
Many park sites and open space areas have been acquired throughout the City,
and some have been developed for use by the general public. Some sites
remain vacant or underutilized. The City Council approved the Vision Plan in
September 2008 which outlines various trail and park projects which have been
included in this plan. The Public Use Master Plan has also outlined a strategy for
the development of trails which has also been incorporated into the CIP list.
These recreational projects add to the vibrancy of the community and they are
designed to contribute to all residents’ quality of life. Parks and other open
spaces have been carefully planned to take advantage of the beautiful coastline
and natural landscape of the peninsula.
5-64
59
PROJECT: ABALONE COVE SHORELINE PARK
PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE: Recreation, Parks & Open Space
LOCATION: Abalone Cove Shoreline Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
With the expected completion of the Land and Water Conservation
Fund grant funded improvement project at Abalone Cove Shoreline
Park in 2014, public usage of this park is anticipated to increase
significantly. The grant funded improvements do not include the
existing parking lot. Thus, this will necessitate improving the existing
parking lot to accommodate the anticipated public demand.
The scope of this project’s work includes paving (with crushed
aggregate base/binder) of the 60,500 square-feet of the frontage lot;
installation of wheel stops and striping; creating spaces for bus drop
off, turnaround and parking; asphalt concrete ADA parking spaces;
removal and replacement of existing wood pylons with boulders;
fencing, landscaping & irrigation around the power generator and
propane tank; landscaping & Irrigation along Palos Verdes Drive
South; removal of light bollards at Annie’s Stand and opening up the
area; vegetation removal; and installation of an automated entrance
and exit system.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR
2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN 30,000
CONSTRUCTION 302,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $332,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Quimby Funding.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION IN FY 13-14 BUDGET
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY
SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING
COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY
QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-65
60
PROJECT:
ABALONE COVE SHORELINE PARK
STAFF BUILDING, RESTROOMS AND
DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Abalone Cove Shoreline Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
With the expected completion (2014) of the grant funded
improvement project at Abalone Cove Shoreline Park, usage of
this park will increase significantly. The staff building and
restrooms are in poor condition; however the grant fund excludes
improvements to this building. The improvements will enhance the
condition of this facility and also make it ADA compliant.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN 18,000
CONSTRUCTION 90,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL 108,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Quimby Funding.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION IN FY 13-14 BUDGET
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-66
61
PROJECT: HESSE PARK PARKING LOT
RESURFACING
TYPE: Recreation, Parks and Open Space
LOCATION: Hesse Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
Hesse Park parking lot is one of the frequently used City facilities.
The AC pavement at this parking lot is deteriorating and needs
resurfacing. Delaying this improvement will add to the cost of work
due to extension of cracks into the depth of the existing pavement
caused by motorists’ usage.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $10,000
CONSTRUCTION $180,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $190,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Quimby Funding.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION IN FY 14-15 BUDGET
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-67
62
PROJECT:
POINT VICENTE INTERPRETIVE
CENTER (PVIC) BUILDING
IDENTIFICATION SIGN / SCREENING
WALL
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: PVIC
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
In order to provide a building identification sign that will also screen
the existing above ground power generator, gas tank, electrical
panels/ transformers, a 100-foot long concrete serpentine shaped
wall is proposed to be installed in the lawn area adjacent to the
pedestrian walkway. This decorative screening wall will include the
following building identification: Point Vicente Interpretive Center
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $15,000
CONSTRUCTION $95,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $110,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Quimby Funding.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION IN FY 13-14 BUDGET
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-68
63
PROJECT: RYAN PARK UPPER PARKING LOT
EXPANSION
TYPE: Recreation, Parks and Open Space
LOCATION: Ryan Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
The capacity of the existing upper parking lot at Ryan Park is
limited to 38 vehicles. With events scheduled at this park on
weekends, the parking lot becomes full and up to 25 vehicles of
the overflow need to park on Hawthorne Blvd. Parking on this
sharply curved and steep segment of the Hawthorne Blvd creates
a potentially unsafe situation for park users who drop off their
youth to use the athletic fields. Additionally, drivers who use the
southern driveway entrance face a potentially unsafe condition
due insufficient sight clearance. The southern driveway of Ryan
Park is budgeted for realignment to improve ingress and egress.
However, with a row of vehicles parked along the western side of
Hawthorne Boulevard, the existing unsafe condition not be
completely addressed. Widening of the upper parking lot will
create another 30 parking spaces with a space for bus drop-off
and turn-around. Additionally, the upper driveway will be
connected to the lower driveway. This will make it possible for
vehicles in the parking lot to move to the lower entrance if the
drivers intend to be on southbound Hawthorne Boulevard.
Increasing the capacity of the parking lot combined with restricting
parking on this segment of Hawthorne Boulevard will enhance
safety and convenience for drivers, bicycle riders and park users
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $400,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $400,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Quimby Funding.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-69
64
PROJECT: SALVATION ARMY TRAIL
IMPROVEMENT POROJECT
TYPE: Recreation, Parks and Open Space
LOCATION: Between Palos Verdes Drive West & the Southerly Boundary of
Salvation Army property.
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The route of the Salvation Army Trail is based on the City’s
Conceptual Trails Plan and the Council adopted Vision Plan which is
considered high priority for public benefit. This 2,200 feet Trail will
connect Tramonto trail to Prickly Bear and other trails in Alta Vicente
Reserve. The existing FY12-13 fund earmarked for trails
improvement in the Recreation, Parks, & Open Space program is
$90,000. The cost estimated for construction and design work is
$193,000. In order to complete this project, it is necessary to
appropriate the balance of $103,000.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
SURVEYING/ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $103,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL* $103,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information:
Existing Budget $90,000
FY 13-14 Budget Request: $103,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION IN FY 13-14 BUDGET
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
5-70
65
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs
through various planning processes, but currently there are not resources to
complete the projects. As funding becomes available and the City Council
prioritizes and approves projects, they may be moved into the funded Five-Year
CIP schedule.
5-71
66
Potential Safety City Council
Project Page Funding Goal Priority Minimum Maximum Identified Funding Sources
Buildings and Other Facility
Improvements 67
Citywide ADA Transition Plan
Implementation X X $4,900,000 $4,900,000 Limited CDBG funds
Point Vicente Park Community Center $3,000,000 $8,000,000
$160,000 Ginsburg Donation for
"Performing Arts" building.
Storage Yard Relocation $300,000 $1,000,000
Solar Park Systems for Hesse Park
Building X $350,000 $350,000 Potential grant funding
Solar Park System for Point Vicente
Interpretive Center (PVIC)X $410,000 $410,000 Potential grant funding
Intangible Capital Outlay 73
No Projects Currently Identified
Roadway Infrastructure 74
Arterial Rehabilitation - Silver Spur Road
(Hawthorne Blvd. to Drybank Dr.)X X $500,000 $500,000
Hawthorne Blvd. Median Improvements
(Via Rivera to City Hall)$250,000 $250,000
Lower Point Vicente Park Access
Modification Project (PVDW at PVIC)X X X $250,000 $300,000 Potential grant funding
Operational Improvements at Crenshaw
& Crest X X X $470,000 $520,000 Potential grant funding
Crenshaw Blvd Extension Parking
Improvements X $125,000 $150,000
Hawthorne Blvd. Right of Way
Beautification X x X $2,200,000 $2,600,000
Hawthorne Blvd. Bike Lane Gap Closure X X $1,200,000 $1,500,000
Traffic Safety Improvements - PVDE at
Miraleste Drive X X X $200,000 $300,000 Potential grant funding
Utility Undergrounding 83
Utility Undergrounding at 25th Street $1,000,000 $1,100,000 Potential Rule 20A funding
Utility Undergrounding at Entrance to
PVIC $150,000 $200,000 Potential Rule 20A funding
Utility Undergrounding at PVDS and
Terranea Way $150,000 $200,000 Potential Rule 20A funding
Storm Drain System 87
Altamira Canyon X $1,250,000 $5,000,000
Interim Altamira Canyon X x $356,000 $356,000
Paintbrush Canyon Drainage X x $2,568,000 $2,568,000
PVDE - Miraleste Canyon X X $2,500,000 $3,200,000
San Pedro & Averill Canyons X X $2,700,000 $3,300,000
Landslide Mitigation Projects 93
Installation of New Dewatering Wells X X $255,000 $255,000
Rehabilitation of Dewatering Wells X X $1,634,000 $1,704,000
Instrument Wells $121,000 $121,000
Recreation, Parks & Open Space 97
Restroom at Del Cerro Park $250,000 $300,000
Gateway Park Development Project $450,000 $475,000 Potential grant opportunity
Grandview Park Improvements (Phase 1)$635,000 $635,000
Lower Hesse Park Improvements (Phase
1)$660,000 $720,000
Preserve Trail Plan - New Trail
Implementation X X $150,000 $150,000 Potential grant opportunity
Lower Point Vicente Park Improvement
Project X X $2,400,000 $2,400,000 Potential grant opportunity
Sunnyside Trail Segment Project $400,000 $450,000
Coast Vision Plan -
Trailhead/Overlook/Vista Point
Development X $100,000 $130,000 Potential grant opportunity
Totals (Min. and Max.)$31,884,000 $44,044,000
Cost Range
RPV Capital Improvement Plan - Unfunded Projects
5-72
67
BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
5-73
68
PROJECT: CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Various
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
The Citywide ADA Transition Plan identifies projects with total cost
estimates of $11.8 million. This estimate includes $2.6 million of
roadway curb ramps and bus stops to be addressed with future
roadway projects; $1.7 million of access improvements at Ladera
Linda to be addressed with any future rehabilitation of the Ladera
Linda Community Center; and $1.3 million of access
improvements at the Civic Center to be addressed with any future
rehabilitation of the City Hall campus.
The remaining $6.2 million of identified projects are to improve
ADA compliance at various other City-owned properties. The
funded section of this document includes $1.3 million of projects
scheduled for the next five years from this list, and address issues
categorized as “potential hazard” and “severe”. The remaining
$4.9 million of this list, as well as the amounts noted above for
roadways, Ladera Linda, and the Civic Center remain unfunded.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Possible future CDBG funding available.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $4.9 million
5-74
69
PROJECT: POINT VICENTE PARK COMMUNITY
CENTER
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Upper Point Vicente/Civic Center
DEPARTMENT: City Manager/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Originally studied by the Open Space Planning, Recreation and
Parks Task Force in 2004, the concept for this facility was later
refined during the redevelopment of the Coast Vision Plan.
Adopted by the City Council in 2008, the latest concept calls for a
20,000 square-foot community center that could accommodate
meeting space for community groups, recreational facilities,
classroom space and full-sized recreational pool.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Impact will need to be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $3,000,000 - $8,000,000
5-75
70
PROJECT: STORAGE YARD RELOCATION
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Various Locations throughout the City
DEPARTMENT: City Manager/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
It has been proposed that City maintenance services be spread
citywide in strategic locations with a central office in City Hall. The
existing storage yard is located on the Upper Point Vicente Park
site which had been identified for various other community uses
due to its prime location.
Staff is proposing the creation of a central location for the storage
yard with satellite locations throughout the City, serving the
storage and other construction needs of the Public Works
Department. The central location of the storage yard will be
situated at or near City Hall for administrative purposes. This
central location will control all satellite locations through the use of
maintenance personnel and through the efficient use of the City’s
network.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The satellite locations will fulfill the following roles: there will be an office trailer at each location; a
construction yard for contractors located throughout the City (possibly generating rental income for the City);
possible satellite EOC centers for access throughout the City; and storage space for various equipment.
Estimated Cost: $300,000 - $1,000,000
5-76
71
PROJECT: SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR HESSE
PARK BUILDING
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Various
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating
systems over the roof of Hesse Park to reduce power consumption
with occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid. This project
will help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce
considerable amounts of emissions. Typically the energy savings
can cover the cost of projects of this scale in an estimated period
of 15 to 20 years.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $350,000
5-77
72
PROJECT:
SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR POINT
VICENTE INTERPRETIVE CENTER
(PVIC)
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Various
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating
systems over the roof of PVIC to reduce power consumption with
occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid. This project will
help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce
considerable amounts of emissions. Typically the energy savings
can cover the cost of projects of this scale in an estimated period
of 15 to 20 years.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Estimated cost is $200,000 - $400,000 for each facility ($600,000 - $1,200,000 total)
Funding: Will seek Federal/State Energy Savings Grants
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $410,000
5-78
73
INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
NO PROJECTS CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED
5-79
74
ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
5-80
75
PROJECT:
ARTERIAL REHABILITATION- SILVER
SPUR ROAD (HAWTHORNE BLVD. TO
DRYBANK DRIVE)
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Silver Spur Road (Hawthorne Blvd. to Drybank Drive)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
After the street right of way was transferred back to the City, Silver
Spur Road will be resurfaced to mitigate roadway distress and
degradation that has occurred over the years. This project will
require milling and overlay, root removal, asphalt patching, curb
and gutter repair, sidewalk repair, ADA ramps and re-striping.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $500,000
5-81
76
PROJECT:
HAWTHORNE BLVD. MEDIAN
IMPROVEMENTS (VIA RIVERA TO
CITY HALL)
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Hawthorne Blvd. (Via Rivera to City Hall)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The development of this median would include installing
sustainable landscaping which will require minimal maintenance.
Development will also include the installation of irrigation systems
and controllers, hardscape, and decorative stone. This would be
the second segment of median improvements.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000
5-82
77
PROJECT: LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK
ACCESS MODIFICATION PROJECT
TYPE: Traffic Improvements
LOCATION: PVDW/PVDS at Lower Point Vicente Park entrance
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve access into and out of the Lower Point Vicente park area by
restricting turn movements to right turn only out of the site at the
southern entrance/exit to minimize vehicle conflicts while negotiating
turn movements.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000 - $300,000
5-83
78
PROJECT:
OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS-
CRENSHAW BLVD. AND CREST
DRIVE
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd. and Crest Drive
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Currently this intersection is a four-way stop controlled
intersection. During the AM and PM peak hours, the westbound
left-turn lanes back up for several hundreds of feet creating
extensive delay and long vehicle queues. An operational
improvement to the intersection is required to improve traffic flow.
A study is being conducted to determine the best solution.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $470,000 - $520,000
5-84
79
PROJECT: CRENSHAW BOULEVARD EXTENSION
PARKING IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd (Valley View Rd to Burma Rd)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In an effort to improve safety, parking and access to the Nature
Preserve entrance near Del Cerro Park, parking improvements and
restrictions are needed to accommodate the growing user demand
and need for emergency vehicle access.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $125,000 - $150,000
5-85
80
PROJECT: HAWTHORNE BLVD RIGHT OF WAY
BEAUTIFICATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Hawthorne Blvd (City Hall to Northerly City Limits)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The City’s Right of Way along Hawthorne Blvd will be beautified by
landscaping and masking blight conditions created by failed fences,
walls and other private improvements. The medians in this area will
be improved by landscape and/or hardscape enhancements.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,200,00 - $2,600,000
--""....
J
5-86
81
PROJECT: HAWTHORNE BLVD BIKE LANE GAP
CLOSURE
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Hawthorne Blvd (Vallon Drive to Dupre Road)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project will improve roadway safety and complete a bike lane gap
closure that exists due to on-street parking demand, roadway
configuration and existing median barriers.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,200,000-$1,500,000
5-87
82
PROJECT:
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS –
PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT
MIRALESTE DRIVE
TYPE: Traffic Improvements
LOCATION: PVDE at Miraleste Drive
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve intersection operations to create improved traffic flow,
vehicle and pedestrian safety. Operational improvements could
include traffic signal controls or a roundabout as warranted.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Have applied and will continue to apply for external funding for traffic safety.
Estimated Cost: $200,000 - $300,000
5-88
83
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
5-89
84
PROJECT: UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT 25TH
STREET
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: 25th Street
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and
coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The
City will coordinate with the associated utility companies
(electrical, communications, etc.) to locate all wires under ground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison’s Rule 20A Funding.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 - $1,100,000
5-90
85
PROJECT: UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT
ENTRANCE TO PVIC
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: Palos Verdes Drive South (at PVIC)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and
coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The
City will coordinate with the associated utility companies
(electrical, communications, etc.) to locate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison’s Rule 20A Funding.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000 - $200,000
5-91
86
PROJECT: UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT PVDS
AND TERRANEA WAY
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: PVDS and Terranea Way
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and
coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The
City will coordinate with the associated utility companies
(electrical, communications, etc.) to locate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison’s Rule 20A Funding.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000 - $200,000
5-92
87
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
5-93
88
PROJECT: ALTAMIRA CANYON
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 4
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the installation of protective measures to
minimize further erosion in the Altamira Canyon. This project
could range from stabilization at bends in stream beds, with limited
velocity controls, to channeled stabilization.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This estimate does not include right of way costs. A previously designed and funded project was abandoned
due to right of way issues and owners lack of support.
Estimated Cost: $1,250,000 - $5,000,000
5-94
89
PROJECT: INTERIM ALTAMIRA CANYON
PROJECT
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
A project within lower Altamira Canyon to aid in slowing the damage
being caused by storm water runoff through the entire reach of the
Canyon is needed. The installation of Gabion type erosion control
structures within lower Altamira Canyon are needed to help control
runoff velocities and minimize erosion within the canyon.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Note: An Altamira Canyon project is included in the 2012 CIP as an unfunded project ranging between
$1.25 Million and $5 Million. The Altamira Canyon project has been studied and analyzed over the past
decades; however the need to minimize runoff from entering the ground in Altamira Canyon still remains.
This interim project will provide a temporary solution within the lower reaches of the canyon until the full
project can be programmed.
Estimated Cost: $356,000
5-95
90
PROJECT: PAINTBRUSH CANYON DRAINAGE
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Paintbrush Canyon Drainage System project will capture
runoff at the head of the Portuguese Bend landslide in three
locations, transfer that runoff via surface mounted High Density
Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe under Palos Verdes Drive South,
(through an existing steel tunnel) and continue along the existing
storm drain pipe alignment to the ocean.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Preventing runoff water from entering the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project is expected to help slow movement within the Portuguese Bend landslide,
eventually affecting the land movement at Palos Verdes Drive South.
Estimated Cost: $2,568,000
5-96
91
PROJECT: PVDE- MIRALESTE CANYON
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 5
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Work within this project area includes storm drainage systems along
Palos Verdes Drive East at the Northern end of PVDE, South
Coach, Rocking Horse, Clevis, North Colt, South Colt, Via Canada,
and at South Via Canada. This project includes the installation of a
number of pipelines and re-setting surface drainage systems to drain
into Miraleste Canyon.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,500,000 - $3,200,000
5-97
92
PROJECT: SAN PEDRO & AVERILL CANYONS
TYPE: Storm Drain Systems
LOCATION: Project Area 6
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Work within this project area would include storm drainage
systems at Miraleste, South Miraleste, North Corsine, Via Colinita,
La Vista, Vista Mesa, and a curb and gutter project on Via
Frascati. This project would include the installation o f a number of
pipelines and regarding of roads and surface drainage systems to
drain into the San Pedro and Averill Canyons. A project at
Miraleste Plaza is currently under design.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 - $3,300,000
5-98
93
LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS
UNFUNDED
5-99
94
PROJECT: INSTALLATION OF NEW
DEWATERING WELLS
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Dewatering Wells are a high priority and are considered to be the
next most effective method of minimizing runoff from entering the
landslide, which helps slow land movement within the landslide.
All runoff that percolates into the ground eventually becomes part
of the groundwater and will cause an increase in the depth of the
groundwater table. Removing groundwater through dewatering
wells helps to lower the groundwater table, relieving soil pressures
at depth and minimizing the negative effects groundwater has on
the landslide. Three new upslope wells in Portuguese Bend and
two new wells in Abalone Cove are initially planned during this
phase of the system’s expansion. These new wells should
improve the system’s effectiveness by increasing the system’s
water removal capacity and by removing water more rapidly. Two
new dewatering well projects should be scheduled annually until
the five have been installed. The cost to install each well is
estimated to be $85,000.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Removing groundwater at depth from the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project will expand the existing system and is expected to help slow movement within the
Portuguese Bend landslide, eventually affecting the land movement along Palos Verdes Drive South.
Estimated Cost: $255,000
5-100
95
PROJECT: REHABILITATION OF DEWATERING
WELLS
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Dewatering Wells are a high priority and are considered to be the
next most effective method of minimizing runoff from entering the
landslide, which helps slow land movement within the landslide.
Up to sixteen existing wells in Abalone Cove and three wells in
Portuguese Bend require routine maintenance and will likely need
to be rehabilitated over the next fifteen years, as will the five new
wells that are planned. Rehabilitation of dewatering wells will
ensure the system’s continued effectiveness by maintaining the
system’s water removal capacity. Well rehabilitation projects
should be scheduled one or two per year as needed following the
installation of the five new dewatering wells. The cost to
rehabilitate one well is $70,000.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Removing groundwater at depth from the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project will help maintain the existing system which has shown to help slow movement
within the Abalone Cove landslide. It is expected that the rehabilitation of wells will eventually affect the land
movement along Palos Verdes Drive South.
Estimated Cost: $1,634,000 - $1,704,000
5-101
96
PROJECT: INSTRUMENT WELLS
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: N/A
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Instrument Wells are needed to monitor groundwater levels and
landslide movement. These wells will provide information that can
be valuable to engineers and scientists when a project to minimize
land movement is designed or when analyzing movement to help
determine where potential projects will be most useful. Collecting
the data would require a person to visit the equipment once monthly
to download the information, transport the information to a host
computer where it would be saved and analyzed. The cost to install
a piezometer and/or inclinometer in a well at depth is currently
estimated to be $100,000, costs associated with the ongoing data
collection and analysis could be an additional $25,000 per year.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
(FY) YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The cost of ongoing data collection and analysis required to facilitate this capital expenditure would need to
be programmed annually when the Automatic GPS Monitoring Station is funded.
Estimated Cost: $121,000
5-102
97
RECREATION, PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
5-103
98
PROJECT: RESTROOM AT DEL CERRO PARK
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Del Cerro Park
DEPARTMENT: Recreation and Parks/Community Development
DESCRIPTION:
This project would include the construction of a restroom at Del
Cerro park to serve the park visitors and the users of the trails in the
Portuguese Bend Open Space.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000 - $300,000
5-104
99
PROJECT: GATEWAY PARK DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: PVDS in the Portuguese Landslide Area
DEPARTMENT: Public Works/Community Development
DESCRIPTION:
The Vision Plan includes a proposed Gateway Park, a 23-acre site
within the City’s Landslide Moratorium area just north of PVDS
between the Portuguese Bend residential community and Klondike
Canyon. Under the Vision Plan, the site has been approved for a
combination of uses such as a “gateway park” for users of the
Nature Preserve’s trail system, an outdoor education/nature
appreciation center for school and community groups and an
equestrian center. The following components of the approved
concept plan are being developed as part of the California Coastal
Trail Project and PVDS Landslide East End Road Realignment
Project: Trail head, signage, fencing, and public parking area.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $450,000 - $475,000
5-105
100
PROJECT: GRANDVIEW PARK IMPROVEMENTS
(PHASE 1)
TYPE: Recreation, Parks & Open Space
LOCATION: Grandview Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
The scope of work of the proposed ‘phase one’ of Grandview park
includes construction of a natural parking lot, restrooms/office,
play area, picnic area and some landscaping. These basic items
are chosen from the concept plan option “Sycamore” which was
selected by the City Council.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $635,000
5-106
101
PROJECT: LOWER HESSE PARK
IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE 1)
TYPE: Recreation, Parks & Open Space
LOCATION: Lower Hesse Park
DEPARTMENT: Public works
DESCRIPTION:
The scope of work of the proposed ‘phase one’ of Lower Hesse
Park includes construction of a natural parking lot, restrooms,
basketball court, play area, picnic area and some landscaping.
These basic items are chosen from the concept plan option
“Pacific” which was selected by the City Council.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $660,000- $720,000
5-107
102
PROJECT: PRESERVE TRAILS PLAN - NEW
TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Palos Verdes Nature Preserve
DEPARTMENT: Community Development/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In October 2012, the City Council adopted an updated Preserve
Trails Plan (PTP) for the NCCP’s Palos Verdes Nature Preserve
which identifies trail routes and trail uses within the Preserve.
Pursuant to the approved management agreement between the
City and PVPLC, the PVPLC is responsible for maintenance and
repair of existing unimproved trails in the Preserve while the City is
responsible for the construction of new trails identified in the PTP.
According to the PTP, there are 3 approved trail routes that
currently do not exist and need to be constructed at some point by
the City. Since projects are moving forward on two of the three
new trails needed (the Smugglers Trail in the Abalone Cove
Reserve and the Switchback Trail in the San Ramon Reserve,
construction of the Crystal Trail (.12 mile) in the Forrestal Reserve
remains as the only new trail that needs construction. In addition,
the Rim Trail will need to be relocated since the current route
passes over private property in Rolling Hills.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000
5-108
103
PROJECT: LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TYPE: Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION: Lower Point Vicente
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The park improvement plan for Lower Point Vicente derives from an
extensive public outreach process associated with the City Council
adopted Vision Plan. The scope of work consists of constructing
new decomposed granite trails, overlooks, reconfigured and new
parking spaces (including new upper terrace parking lot), drainage
facilities (including a bioswale), landscaping, fencing, way finding
signs and minor site grading to accommodate the improvements
(excavation cannot occur in areas capped for the lead remediation.)
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,400,000
5-109
104
PROJECT: SUNNYSIDE TRAIL SEGMENT
PROJECT
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Sunnyside Ridge Road (Intersection of Sunnyside Ridge Trail and
the Sol Vista Segment Trail)
DEPARTMENT: Community Development/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Sunnyside Segment Trail is a point-to-point trail segment that
begins on Sunnyside Ridge Road at the intersection of the
Sunnyside Ridge Trail and the currently unused Sol Vista Segment
Trail on the old Narbonne Right-of-Way, as indicated in the City’s
Conceptual Trail Plan. The proposal is to provide a usable trail
linkage for pedestrians and equestrians within a recorded trail
segment that traverses a privately owned lot that is currently
developed with a single-family residence that was formally part of an
old City right-of-way. The trail connection would involve the provision
of a 5-foot wide decomposed granite surface trail.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $400,000 - $450,000
5-110
105
PROJECT:
COAST VISION PLAN
TRAILHEAD/OVERLOOK/VISTA POINT
DEVELOPMENT
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Various Locations
DEPARTMENT: Public Works/Community Development
DESCRIPTION:
The Vision Plan identifies the construction of trailheads at key
entrances to the existing City trail system along with overlooks and
vista points within the Vision Plan project area. The trailheads would
consist of a permeable surface pad, a bench, a plastic bag kiosk for
dog owners, trash and recycling receptacles, signage, a freestanding
kiosk for trail notices, small native trees for shade and pockets of
native shrubs, where appropriate. The overlooks/vista points would
be placed on decomposed granite or other permeable material with
flush stone edging and could include a semicircle bench, a stone
pilaster displaying pertinent information, a stone clad wall less than 3
feet in height and pockets of native shrubs.
.
Phase 1 would involve a trail head at Shoreline Park/25th and
overlooks/vista points at Inspiration Point and Eagles Nest. Phase 2
would involve trail heads and overlooks/vistas at the cul-de-sac next
to St. Paul’s Church, Del Cerro Park, and the end of Ocean Terrace.
Phase 3 would involve a trail head at the Switchbacks/PVDE
Turnout and overlooks/vista points at the Switchbacks/PVDE
Turnout, Paintbrush Canyon/Burma Road, and Burma Road above
Gateway Park.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $100,000 - $130,000
5-111