Loading...
RPVCCA_CC_SR_2013_05_21_H_San_Ramon_Canyon_Contract_Change_OrderCITY OF MEMORANDUM RANCHO PALOS VERDES TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR &CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS LES JONES,INTERIM DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORK May 21,2013 APPROVE VALUE ENGINEERING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER FOR SAN RAMON PROJECT REVIEWED:CAROLYN LEHR,CITY MANAGER S?f~fY.. Project Manager:Ron Dragoo,Senior Engine~~ RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Interim Director of Public Works to execute Change Order Number 1 to the San Ramon Canyon Stormwater Flood Reduction Project with L.H.Woods and Sons,Inc. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The City Council authorized a construction contract with L.H.Woods and Sons,Inc.at their March 5,2013 meeting.The contract requires the Contractor to install approximately 4,000 feet of pipe from San Ramon Canyon to the Pacific Ocean. The specifications for the construction of the San Ramon Canyon Stormwater Flood Reduction Project call for the use of a proprietary steel pipe manufactured by Permalok pipe as follows: "Fifty four inch (54")outside diameter steel pipe and fittings used for this project shall be "Permalok"Steel Pipe (Class 3,DSAW,shop rolled and welded from commercial grade steel plating that carries a yield strength of 35ksi in accordance with Permalok specifications)or pre-approved exact equal.Each pipe length is anticipated to be twenty-feet (20')long and comes with a Permalok "Push Ring" and "RTV Silicone Sealant"."Permalok"steel pipe has a prefabricated interlocking pipe joining system that does not require field welding to make the required field connections (except at elbow bends or wall thickness transition connections)..." The pipe system was recommended by the design engineer Harris &Associates.Staff accepted the design engineer's recommendation to use the Permalok pipe system. H-1 This system was used during the construction of the McCarrell Canyon storm drain system,and it nearly eliminates the need for field welding and lining at the pipe joints. Permalok pipe is proprietary and patented.The pipe has a male end with machined teeth on the male end and corresponding teeth on the female end,which allows the pipe to lock into place when forced together.The typical way of joining steel pipes is to weld them together. As previously mentioned,Permalock pipe was successfully used for the McCarrell Canyon Project in a similar application several years ago.However there were/are a number of shortcomings,which include the need to do extensive amounts of repairs to the pipe lining,which had been damaged during transportation.A second issue is that of the epoxy lining that was used by Permalok,which is strong,also is brittle and has not performed as well as expected,based upon a recent inspection of the pipe in McCarrell Canyon. Permalok pipes used during the McCarrell Canyon construction were manufactured in St Louis and delivery and handling of the pipes was a major concern.The pipes manufactured at the Permalok facility in Missouri are shipped by road to another facility about 20-miles away in Illinois for coating and lining.The completed products are loaded onto rail cars and shipped to a marshaling yard for shipment to a rail head in Kansas City.They continue on their journey and once again go through marshaling before being shipped to another rail-head.This process is repeated 2 or 3 more times before they arrive at Barstow,where they wait for the appropriate window (which is sometimes several days)to negotiate the Cajon Pass before arriving at Rancho Cucamonga,where the pipes are off loaded and delivered to a staging yard.The pipes then are loaded and shipped to the field by road when required.With all the handling, the pipes sustain a fair amount of damage to the epoxy coating and the lead-time between manufacture and delivery is extensive and unpredictable. Staff is proposing waving the requirement for the contractor to use the proprietary "permalok"product and accept the Contractor's proposal for an approved alternative steel pipe. The General Contractor L.H.Woods &Sons has proposed substituting the Permalok steel pipe with a conventional welded steel pipe using similar specifications for the steel used in the fabrication of the pipe.The alternative steel pipe is manufactured by North West Pipe in California.The pipes will be lined using a polyurethane lining,which has excellent wear properties,is more flexible than epoxy and is less prone to chipping.It also can be repaired more easily if it becomes damaged over time by rocks and debris that enter the pipe.Staff believes the proposed flexible pipe lining material and process to install the lining is superior to the epoxy lining in the Permalock pipe that was specified in the City's bid documents.The pipe will be joined with a 3"bell lap and welded together conforming to specific welding standards.The joints will be lined with the polyurethane liner in the field under controlled conditions.The vast majority of all large diameter steel piping used through the country is installed using the bell lap welded method previously described. The substitute pipe is manufactured and lined in the same facility located in Southern California and is shipped directly to the job site by road,minimizing the amount of handling and minimizing the chances to damage the pipe lining. H-2 Harris and Associates are the design engineers for the San Ramon Project;they are not steel pipe specialists,so to evaluate the adequacy of the proposed steel pipe,the City contracted with Kennedy Jenks,an independent steel pipe specialist consulting firm to perform a technical comparison between the two products.Kennedy Jenks found the proposed substitute pipe to be an equivalent product to the Permalock pipe. Staff believes the proposed pipe lining material and process to be superior to the epoxy lining specified by the City in its original plans and specifications.Harris &Associates, the Engineer of Record has accepted Kennedy Jenks findings. The contractor has provided the City with all of the costs associated with using both products,which shows a total saving of $630,688.80.City staff has reviewed the numbers and verified that they are an accurate representation of the savings.The California Public Contract Code Section 7101 states: "The state or any other public entity in any public works contract awarded to the lowest bidder,may provide for ·the payment of extra compensation to the contractor for the cost reduction changes in the plans and specifications for the project made pursuant to a proposal submitted by the contractor.The extra compensation to the contractor shall be 50 percent of the net savings in construction costs as determined by the public entity.For projects under the supervision of the Department of Transportation or local or regional transportation entities,the extra compensation to the contractor shall be 60 percent of the net savings,if the cost reduction changes significantly reduce or avoid traffic congestion during construction of the project,in the opinion of the public entity.The contractor may not be required to perform the changes contained in an eligible change proposal submitted in compliance with the provisions of the contract unless the proposal was accepted by the public entity." Proposals of this type submitted by contractors are typically referred to as value engineering proposals.If the proposal is accepted by the City,the Public Contract Code requires that the savings initiated by the contractor must be shared on a 50:50 basis between the City and the contractor.Therefore the savings offered to the City for this material change is $315,334.40. Staff believes,based on technical review of the proposed materials that the two types of pipe are equivalent,and the steel pipe proposed by the Contractor is preferable because the polyurethane lining offered with the substitute pipe is less brittle than the lining of the Permalock pipe.Staff is also concerned about the Permalok pipe delivery schedule. For all of these reasons,Staff recommends the acceptance of the Contractor's Value Engineering offer,which represents a saving of $315,334.40 to the project and requests the City Council to authorize Change Order Number 1 to the San Ramon Stormwater Floodwater Reduction Project to formalize the change. CONCLUSIONS Adopting staff's recommendation will authorize the Interim Director of Public Works to execute the attached Contract Change Order,changing the contract requirements to allow use of the steel pipe and lining proposed by the Contractor. H-3 FISCAL IMPACT Adopting staff's recommendation will reduce to overall cost of construction by $315,334.40. Attachment:A) B) C) Contract Change Order Number 1 Report from Kennedy Jenks Letter from Harris and Associates H-4 <t l- i ~ ~<. Project: 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Palos Verdes,CA 90275 Rancho San Ramon Canyon Storm Drain System Project Change Order # Attention:Mike Ireland L.H.Woods &Sons,Inc. 2115 La Mirada Drive CA 92801 Description I Quantity Unit Price 1 Vista, Amount Value Engineering to supply and install an approved alternative 54"steel pipe for the project.The cost saving is shared at a 50:50 ratio with the contractor.All expenses,including the hiring of a certified independent -50%I 630,668.80 ILS welding inspector are included in the net saving.Note:This CO is subject to final approval of the submittals by Harris &Associates and acceptance by the City Council. Total Original Contract Value Total Value of all Previous Change Orders Total Revised Contract Sum Prior to this Change Order Value of this Change Order New Contract Sum Change in Contract Days Revised Contract Completion Date -315,334.40 -315,334.40 15,140,000.00 0.00 15,140,000.00 -315,334.40 14,824,665.60 o 4/6/2014 Accepted:LH Woods &Sons By Date:_ Construction Manager By Date:_ Authorized: By Rancho Palos Verdes Date:_ H- 5 Attachment B) Kennedy'.Jenks Consultants 8 April 2013 Memorandum To: From: Subject: Mr.Alan Braatvedt ~ City of Rancho Palos Verdes James Bowland P.E.C6640~~ Pipe Material Evaluation for tan Ramon Storm Drain Project K1J ProjectNumber The purpose of this memo is to present our opinion on the use of Northwest Pipe supplied spiral welded and polyurethane lined and coated steel pipe with heat shrink sleeves for exterior joint coating versus Permalok epoxy lined welded steel pipe with an epoxy coating for the San Ramon Storm Drain Project. Background The 4,100 linear foot long pipe will be used as a storm drain and be subject to heavy debris flow and very high water velocities.Approximately 200 linear feet will be installed in a "slant drain" mined tunnel as the pipe approaches the ocean outfall.A second 1,850 linear foot portion of the pipe will be installed in a steel ribbed and timber lagging tunnel.In both trenchless installations the annular space between the carrier pipe and tunnel will be fully grouted.The remainder of the pipe will be installed using open cut trenching and use imported sand as backfill or concrete if cover is less than two feet. Evaluation This section presents our evaluation of the materials and will compare the steel used to fabricate the pipe,the pipe joints,and the linings and coatings. Steel Pipe Materials The Permalok pipe is a rolled and sheet welded steel cylinder constructed of 35,000 pound per square inch (psi)yield strength steel.Permalok's web site states that they use a minimum ASTM A36 structural or ASTM A572 plate steel.The Northwest supplied steel pipe is spiral welded AWWA specified C200 pipe that will have ASTM A1018 or plate welded ASTM A572 Grade 40 (40 ksi)steel.The A572 material is used when the pipe wall thickness exceeds the capabilities of the spiral weld machine,and the pipe has to be manufactured using rolled steel plate. The Northwest pipe steel is eqUivalent in strength to the Permalok pipe,and the AWWA manufacturing standards will add extra quality assurance and quality control to the manufacturing process. u;~amesbowland\san ramon\pipe_memo_san ramon 8apr2013.docx @ Kennedy/Jenks Consultants,Inc H-6 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Memorandum Mr.Alan Braatvedt 8 April 2013 Page 2 Pipe Joints The Permalok pipe uses a proprietary T5 machined joint ring to join 20-foot lengths of pipe during assembly in the field.The joint is designed primarily for tunnel casing installation.The joint is designed to transfer jacking loads between pipe sections and maintain the alignment between pipe pieces.The T5 joint is not water tight and is not designed for pressure pipe applications. The Northwest pipe uses a bell and spigot double lap weld joint.The pipe joint is water tight and is the industry standard for steel water and sewer pipes.This joint is not designed for pipe jacking;however the double welding gives the pipe joint an equivalent strength of the adjacent steel cylinder for buckling (static and live loads)and longitudinal forces from thermal expansion and contraction. Since the Permalok pipe uses a mechanical joint it will not perform as well as a continuously welded pipe if cathodic protection is used for protecting the exterior of the pipe.While it is our experience that the Permalok pipe is electrically continuous (Freeport Regional Water Authority Segment 1 Bruceville Tunnel 2008),it is not designed to be electrically continuous without joint bonding. For this application the Northwest double welded bell and spigot joint is at least equivalent due to its water tightness and electrical continuity.Also note that since the pipe will not be used for pipe jacking the Permalok T5 joint is not needed. Linings and Coatings The Permalok pipe specified has an interior lining of 80 mils of "Tnemec Series 431 Perma- Shield PL"and an exterior coating of 30 mils of Sherwin Williams Duraplate.Northwest Pipe is proposing to use a 100%solids polyurethane lining from Lifelast (Lifelast 210).The lining thicknesses proposed by Northwest Pipe are the same as specified for the epoxy products. Table 1:Physical Characteristics presents a summary comparison between the epoxy and polyurethane products physical characteristics from ASTM testing.Examining the physical characteristics reveals that both products are very similar in abrasion resistance,hardne.ss,and adhesion.The polyurethane is slightly better in impact resistance and is far superior when it is deformed.With the superior deformation characteristics the polyurethane will remain a "plastic" material after it cures while the epoxy becomes a hard and brittle material.Both materials exhibit very similar resistances against corrosive agents normally found in wastewater and are recommended for protection of steel surfaces in severe wastewater conditions.This chemical resistance should extend to the resistance against salt water corrosion from atmospheric exposure of the pipeline near the ocean outfall. u:'jamesbowlandlsan ",mon\plpe_memo_san ",mon Sapr2013.doex €I Kennedy/Jenks Consultants,Inc. H-7 Kennedy/,Jenks Consultants Memorandum Mr.Alan Braatvedt 8 April 2013 Page 3 Table 1:Physical Characteristics Parameter Epoxy-Tnemec Series 431 Abrasion (ASTM D4060)76 mg Hardness-Shore D Hardness 78 Adhesion to steel (ASTM D4551)1,769 psi Deflectio~No cracking following 5%ring deflection Flexibility (ASTM D522)N/A Polyurethane-Lifelast 210 69.4 mg 74±3 >1,500 psi N/A No cracking or delaminating on 1" mandrel Impact resistance (ASTM G14)160 in-Ibs (from NASSCO spec)180 in-Ibs. Field coating the Permalok pipe would only be used when the pipe joints are welded for joint restraint,the field coating would be the same epoxy used for shop coating the exterior of the pipe.The Northwest pipe would use an 80 mil heat shrink sleeve for the exterior of the pipe joints and hand or spray applied Lifelast 210 for the interior pipe joints.While the field coating of the Northwest pipe would be more laborious it is better than the Permalok pipe since it is thicker on the exterior joints and 100%of the interior joints would be coated.With the Permalok pipe there is a possibility of corrosion at the pipe joints since the joint seam is not coated. It is our opinion that the polyurethane lining material would be superior to epoxy in an extremely abrasive environment with debris flows since it is less susceptible to chipping from debris and cracking from pipe deflection.In addition all the pipe joints are coated reducing corrosion at the pipe joints. Summary In summary it is our opinion that the steel pipe cylinder.pipe joint,and coatings being proposed are at least equivalent to the Permalok pipe that was specified and add advantages that include: •Manufacturing to AWWA standards, •Water tight and electrically continuous pipe joint. •Lining has an increased resistance to impact and deformation,and •Interior and exterior of pipe are lined and coated during installation. cc:David Ferguson,Los Angeles u:\!amesbowlandlsan ramon'l>ipe_memo_san ramon 8epr2013.docx IJ Kennedy/Jenks Consullents.Inc. H-8 Attachment C) ,----_._--_.-.--\ ,I ,I---~-~-,~, ~.Y-.t L.H.WOODS &SONS,INC. general tEngineerine Contractors • *REV'ISWE"D ~~ S U~STiT\JTt=: (NOT "'$p...rJ ""PPfL'OlJf5,D ~~U~l-) rIJ REVfEWED X-rIJ RESUBMmAl NOT REQUIRED o NOTE CORRECTIONS 0 RESUBMIT fJ REJECTED 9Ailbment has been revelwed for general conformance and compliance wiltl the design concepl of the l!tOje(:t and infQtmationgiven In the COl'l1racl DocI.Itrlenls.(Any action shoWn is subject 10 the requireInenls 01 \he COntract Documents).AwtWal of 8 specific ilem does not include approval 01 tna assembly of which the item 15 iii component. ConlraQtol'Is re$pOllslble for.COnflnt}ing1Jt*_..I...8ocmSfllI~8.~.ociates101.•d taetlfllqUO$of construction:rl!~•fng the War!<wllh 1hat of aN other trades and performing all Work io ill safa and sati$faetory manner.Any discrepenckls between Contract Doct.Imenlll and Contractors sUbmlttaJ $hall be the responsibility of Contractor. May 14,2013 City of Rancho Palos Ve 30940 Hawthome Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes,C Mr.Alan Braatvedt San Ramon Canyon Sto 05/09/2013 submittal #36 DATE: TO: ATTN: RE: Oear,Alan. following 2.,.old ~~~~ each one of the pipes and specials is numbered With it's position In the alignment.Also, the Slant drain Is 20'segments with no exterior coating and the Rib Lag Is 25'segments with no exterior coating (It would be dlffloult for cross-use here).Lay drawings for e.ach segment will be supplied accordingly.Northwest Pipe Company will also respond to the request. 3.LHWS has proposed to use a Single Double Pass weld on the Interior of the piping system.This Is a watertight welded system,meeting all the requirements of the AWW A and AWS,that would withstand test pressures of 200 PSI,far greater than any.(perma- 10k)joint would,as they are not considered water tight.Currently,I do not believe that the AWWA allows a perma-Iok joint for water conveyance. 4.All of the spiral welded pipe is suitable for jacking into place.This is a common practice regUlarly undertaken in all 50 states with spiral welded pipe.LHWS has completed more than 150 locations in the past 50 years,where spiral welded carrier pipe Is jacking Into a host tunnel or pipe.NW Pipe will also supply a list of the hundreds of projects and agencies that have also successfully done so.The pipe will be plaoed onto skids in the Pit,lined up with the pipe previous pushed into place,Inserted to the stop fine and then finally tack welded on the 00 in four locations so that the pipe can be pushed into the tunnel segment.Once the entire alignment Is pushed into place all of the interior double pass welding will be completed.Northwest Pipe Company will also respond to the request. 1. Corporate Office:2115 La Mirada Drive •Vista.CA 92081 •(760)599·5500 •Fax:(760)599·5510 H-9 L.H.WOODS &SONS,INC. qeneraCfEngineering Contractors • 5.The details for the 1"pipe and velocity reducer rings will be supplied with the detailed lay drawings.Northwest Pipe Company wiJI also respond to the request. 6.Full lining repair of the hold backs will be completed. 7.The credit for the approved alternate and/or equal is ongoing. Respectfully yours, Michael Ireland GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS Corporate Office:2115la Mirada Drive •Vista,CA 92081 •(760)599-5500 •Fax:(760)599·5510 H-10