Loading...
RPVCCA_CC_SR_2013_05_07_03_Draft_2013_5YR_Capital_Improvement_PlanCITY OF MEMORANDUM 4; O:RANCHO PALOS VERDES TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: REVIEWED BY: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCI~ DENNIS McLEAN,DIRECTOR OF FINANCE &INFORMATION ~ TECHNOLOGY MAY 7,2013 DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (Supports 2013 City Council Goals of Public Infrastructure & Government Efficiency,Fiscal Control,and Transparency) CAROLYN LEHR,CITY MANAGER cY--.. Project Managers:Kathryn Downs;J~eputy Director of Finance &Information Technology LW Ryan Mills,Senior Administrative Analyst RECOMMENDATION 1.Review the draft 2013 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)and provide direction to Staff;and 2.Approve Staff's recommendation for projects to be included in the draft FY13-14 budget. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)is a guide for the efficient and effective provision of resources for improving and maintaining public infrastructure and facilities.The CIP is segregated into both funded and unfunded projects and includes detailed "project sheets" that provide a project description,project type (ex.Roadway Infrastructure),location, department responsible,estimates of cost and the justification (ex.safety,City Council goal or essential service).The CIP document does not include any projects with estimated costs below the infrastructure capitalization threshold of $100,000. Although the CIP document presents project funding for five years,the City Council approves CIP projects for the upcoming fiscal year only.This gives the City Council the ability to shift priorities when needed,while at the same time identify future projects and potential funding mechanisms. 3-1 DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN May 7,2013 Page 2 Projects are generally added to the funded schedule as available funding sources are identified (ex.grant funds).Projects are usually funded first from restricted funds,such as Proposition C and TDA Article 3 funds,so as to be conservative in allocating General Fund monies only when necessary.For the first time,Staff is recommending to plan for uses of the CIP Reserve (funded with General Fund money equivalent to Transient Occupancy Tax revenue)in years 2 through 5 of the CIP document.Now that a state grant has been provided for a portion of the San Ramon Canyon Stabilization project and the City's share will be funded either through the use of existing reserves or debt (or a combination of same),Staff recommends populating the five years of the 2013 CIP with proposed uses of the City's primary unrestricted funding source for infrastructure. 2013 CIP The 2013 CIP includes the Five-Year CIP Funded Schedule (page 12 of the attached CIP) that has been integrated into the draft 2013 Five-Year Financial Model.Projects in the FY13-14 column of the Five-YearCIP Funded Schedule total $9,157,856,and are included in Staff's working draft of the FY13-14 budget.Staff requests approval from the City Council to include the $9,157,856 of projects in the draft FY13-14 bUdget to be presented to City Council on May 21,2013.The Five-Year CIP Funded Schedule within the CIP document does not include any projects with estimated costs below the $100,000 infrastructure capitalization threshold. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION The CIP is a guide for the efficient and effective provision of resources for improving and maintaining public infrastructure and facilities.Programming capital facilities and improvements over time can promote better use of the City's limited financial resources, reduce costs and assist in the coordination of public and private development.Based on guidelines of the framework and those set forth by the City Council,Staff developed an inventory of capital projects.This inventory was compiled through a comprehensive review of existing reports,infrastructure plans,community input and the City Council's direction, goals and priorities.Some of these plans include the follOWing:the Pavement Management System,Vision Plan,Sanitary Sewer Master Plan,Public Use Master Plan, Trails Network Plan,Storm Drain Master Plan and the General Plan. As required by state law,the Planning Commission will conduct its review of the CIP at its meeting on May 28,2013.The purpose is solely for the Planning Commission to adopt a resolution,finding that the City's 2013 CIP is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. The purpose of this presentation is to provide the City Council with an overview of projects which have been proposed for the Five-Year CIP.After any changes directed by Council have been made,Staff will return to the Council for formal adoption of the 2013 CIP document on June 18,2013. 3-2 DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN May 7,2013 Page 3 PRIORITIZING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Staff has evaluated every project quantified during the establishment and update of the CIP and established Criteria justifications that are reflected on each project sheet.These justification categories include:safety,support of essential City services,support of Council plan goals,economy and efficiency,outside funding,and community quality/sustainability. The Criteria justifications,or a combination of,as well as the availability of restricted (non- General Fund)monies,are utilized to establish the priority level of CIP projects.Staff has included columns on the Funded and Unfunded lists (pages 12 &66 of the document)to indicate whether the project supports public safety or another City Council priority. In the past,Staff has recommended the funding of CIP projects based on the availability of funding m~chanisms,such as the availability of restricted revenues and accumulated restricted funds,so as to be conservative with the allocation of general fund monies.This is consistent with Government Finance Officers'Association's (GFOA)Best Practice that states: "When integrating plans with financial policies,governments should consider both the costs and revenue streams.Possible revenue streams include bond programs,pay as you go alternatives,grants,impact fees,and public private partnership alternatives.Reviewing the revenue generating potential under the plan assumptions will help identify the capability to finance needed capital projects as well as any gaps in the ability to do so.Moreover,the plan's vision should be balanced between the financial capacities to meet the stated goals,or at a minimum,should clearly identify the financial implications of a vision that may conflict with the jurisdiction's financial policies and capacity.,,1 However,now that the San Ramon Stabilization project has been partially funded with a grant and the City's contribution will be funded with either the CIP Reserve or debt (or a combination of the same),Staff and the City's Financial Advisor recommend that the City Council plan for the use of the CIP Reserve for future project funding. PROJECTS ADDED TO FUNDED LIST The following projects were added to the 2013 CIP Five-Year Funded List based upon priority,funding availability,and opportunities to combine projects for increased efficiency: Buildings and other Facility Improvements •Hesse Park Multi-Purpose Room Improvements •Fiber Optic Cabling -Hesse Park/Ryan Park 1 GFOA Best Practice "The Role of Master Plans in Capital Improvement Planning"(2008). http://www.gfoa.org/index.ph p?option=com content&task=view&id=1600 3-3 DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN May 7,2013 Page 4 •Fiber Optic Cabling -Abalone Cove Sewer Lift Stations/Shoreline Park/Ladera Linda Park •Ladera Linda Community Center Buildings Replacement Roadway Infrastructure •PVDS -East of Landslide •PVDS Road Way Realignment and Drainage Project •PVDE Bronco -Headland Safety Improvements •PVDE Multi-Modal Improvements Utility Undergrounding •Crenshaw Boulevard Undergrounding Landslide Mitigation Projects •New Landslide Dewatering Wells (2) Storm Water Quality Projects •Drainage Area Monitoring System •Storm Water Quality Regional Improvement Project Sewer Projects •Basswood Avenue •West General Avenue •Abalone Cove •Ironwood Street •PVDS &Schooner Drive •PVDS &Sea Cove Drive •Ginger Root Lane •Malaga Canyon •Miscellaneous Projects Recreation,Parks &Open Space •Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Parking Lot Improvement •Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Staff Building,Restrooms and Driveway Improvements •Hesse Park Parking Lot Resurfacing •PVIC Building Identification Sign/Screening Wall •Ryan Park Parking Lot Expansion •Salvation Army Trail The CIP document provides full descriptions of each project. 3-4 DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN May 7,2013 Page 5 The Hawthorne Blvd.median improvement (Via Rivera to City Hall)was moved from the Funded list to the Unfunded list based on City Council direction on March 19,2013 and April 30,2013. CHANGES TO THE UNFUNDE'D LIST The following projects were quantified and added to the 2013 CIP Unfunded List: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements •Citywide ADA Transition Plan Implementation Roadway Infrastructure •Hawthorne Boulevard Right of Way Beautification •Hawthorne Boulevard Bike Lane Gap Closure Storm Drain System •Interim Altamira Canyon Drainage •Paintbrush Canyon Drainage Landslide Mitigation Projects •Installation of New Dewatering Wells •Rehabilitation of Dewatering Wells •Instrument Wells Recreation.Parks &Open Space •Restroom at Del Cerro Park •Lower Point Vicente Park Improvements (Phase 1) •Lower Hesse Park Improvements (Phase 1) •Grandview Park Improvements (Phase 1) The Unfunded section of the CIP document provides full descriptions for each project. The new construction of City Hall and related Civic Center projects have been removed from the Unfunded list pending further direction from the City Council.Staff expects that further direction will be provided after the ad-hoc Subcommittee of the City Council for the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Master Plan develops alternatives. Infrastructure Management Plan The City's Financial Advisor,Tim Schaefer of Magis AdVisors,has encouraged an overall review of infrastructure replacement in conjunction with the City's ability to fund replacement in the future.This overall review includes development of an Infrastructure Management Plan (referred to as the "IMP"until an appropriate name is established)that would provide a long-term road map for the systematic replacement/rehabilitation of the City's infrastructure. 3-5 DRAFT 2013 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN May 7,2013 Page 6 The initiation of the IMP would begin with the preparation of an infrastructure condition assessment (an Infrastructure "Report Card")by a consultant.The report card will provide a basis for the development of a long-term infrastructure capital maintenance and replacement/rehabilitation plan and funding plan.In contrast,the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan is a mid-term view of quantified projects and funding sources. On the City's books,infrastructure is carried at its historical cost of $157.5 million,less $73.2 million of depreciation.About one-quarter of the infrastructure cost was estimated at 1973 value,when the City was incorporated and assets were transferred from the county. Most of the infrastructure has estimated useful life ranging from 30 to 50 years.We can roughly estimate the hypothetical replacement cost of this infrastructure with a simple calculation.If the increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI)is applied to the historical cost of the assets (average of 3.35%since 1973),then today's estimated replacement cost is about $331 million.If this estimated replacement cost in nominal dollars is evenly distributed over a 50 year period,the rate of infrastructure rehabilitation spending would be about $6.6 million per year (or about 180%of the City's annual transit occupancy tax revenue).The actual replacement cost of the City's infrastructure assets may be greater than this hypothetical estimate.In addition,this hypothetical estimate does not provide for any enhancements of infrastructure,only the rehabilitation of existing infrastructure. Attachments: Proposed 2013 Five-Year capital Improvement Plan 3-6 Draft 2013 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan 3-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 FUNDED PROJECTS 11 FIVE YEAR CIP FUNDED GRID 12 BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 13 INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY 20 .ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE,.22 UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING 36 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 38 LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS 43 STORM WATER QUALITY 45 SEWER PROJECTS 48 RECREATION,PARKS &OPEN SPACE 58 UNFUNDED PROJECTS 65 UNFUNDED GRID 66 BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 67 INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY 73 ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE,.74 UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING 83 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 87 LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS 93 RECREATION,PARKS &OPEN SPACE 97 2 3-8 INTRODUCTION A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)is a guide toward the efficient and effective provision of public infrastructure and facilities.Programming capital facilities and improvements over time can promote better use of the City's limited financial resources,reduce costs and assist in the coordination of public and private development.In addition,the planning process is valuable as a means of coordinating and taking advantage of joint planning and development of facilities and infrastructure where possible.Careful management of these assets keeps the City poised for flexible and responsive strategic planning that allows the City to proactively prepare the groundwork for capital projects so when funding opportunities arise,a plan is ready to be implemented.By looking beyond year-to-year budgeting and projecting what,where,when and how capital investments should be made,capital planning enables public organizations to maintain an effective level of service for the present and future population. THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) The result of this continuing planning process is the CIP,which is the City's five-year plan for infrastructure projects.The CIP addresses the City's needs relating to the acquisition,expansion, and r~habilitation of long-lived facilities and infrastructure.The CIP serves as a planning instrument in conjunction with the City's General Plan and the City Council's Goals to identify needed capital projects and coordinate the financing and timing of improvements in a way that maximizes the return to the public.It provides a planned systematic approach to utilizing the City's limited financial resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service and infrastructure needs.It serves as the "blueprint"for the future of the community and is a management and planning tool,rather than a binding document. The underlying strategy of the CIP is to plan for necessary land acquisition,construction and maintenance of public facilities necessary for the safe and efficient provision of public services in accordance with City policies and objectives adopted in the City's General Plan.A critical element of a balanced CIP is the provision of funds to both preserve or enhance existing facilities and provide new assets to respond to changing needs and community growth.While the program serves as a long range plan,it is reviewed and revised annually in conjunction with the budget.Priorities may be changed due to funding opportunities or circumstances that propel a project to a higher importance.Along the way,projects may be revised for significant costing variances. The CIP is primarily a document that assists in addressing the City's long-term needs.As such, the projects and their scopes are subject to change from year to year as the needs of the community become more defined and projects move closer to final implementation.The adoption of the CIP is neither a commitment to a particular project nor a limitation to a particular cost.As a basic tool for scheduling anticipated capital projects,it is also a key element in planning and controlling future capital financing. For this reason,the CIP includes some "unfunded"projects in which needs have been qualified,but specific solutions and funding sources have not been determined. When adopted,the CIP provides the framework for the City's management team and the City Council with respect to investment planning,project planning and the managing of any debt.This document is independent of the City Council's goals and is intended to serve as a mid-term planning document. THE CIP PROCESS The capital improvement plan and budget is the result of an ongoing infrastructure planning process.Infrastructure planning decisions must be made with regard to both existing and new facilities and equipment.For existing facilities,the planning process addresses appropriate capital renewal strategies and repair-versus-replacement of facilities.New service demands are also considered since they often affect capital facility requirements. Planning for the five-year CIP period and subsequent years,includes linking the General Plan to the capital plan 3 3-9 requirements,conducting needs assessments and allowing for flexibility to take advantage of opportunities for capital investment.The FY13-14 through FY17-18 CIP is developed through input from professional staff,citizens of Rancho Palos Verdes,and elected or appointed City officials. CIP REVIEW TEAM A CIP Review team is responsible for annually reviewing capital project requests and providing recommendations to the City Manager.This team is comprised of staff from the Office of the City Manager,Finance and Information Technology,Public Works,Community Development,and Recreation and Parks departments,and the City Attorney.This team conducts an in-depth analysis of the impact of the CIP on present and future cash flows and financial obligations,as well as the City's ability to finance,process,design,and ultimately maintain projects.The team will also analyze the fiscal impact for each individual project;including future maintenance and replacement costs,associated monetary benefits (e.g.future maintenance savings),as well as any applicable future revenue opportunities.The team meets periodically throughout the year to evaluate the progress of projects,and examine future needs of the City. The overall goal of the CIP Review Team is to develop CIP recommendations that: •Preserve the past by investing in the continued upgrade of City assets and infrastructure; •Protect the present with improvements to City facilities and infrastructure; •Plan for the future. Projects are identified by staff,professional consultants,residents and/or elected officials.There are typically more proposals than can be funded in the five-year CIP period,so the team conducts an internal project ranking process.The criteria used in this internal ranking includes,but is not limited to,safety,support of essential City services,support of City Council's goals,economy and efficiency,outside funding committed (or eligible for),and community quality/sustainability. Projects are prioritized based on the criteria outlined in this plan in the following section.If a project receives a lower ranking,it just means that other projects in that period of time are more critical for the City to address.While ratings are important in determining recommended projects, the realities of the City's financial situation are critical to all decisions. CIP CRITERIA Safety:Enhance or improve the overall safety of the City and delivery of services.Protect the health and welfare of residents. Supports Essential City Services:Maintenance and development of existing or new facilities and infrastructure which allows the City to deliver essential services to residents of Rancho Palos Verdes. Supports City Council Goals:Supports the goals annually established by the City Council in the CITY COUNCIL.Meets citywide long-term goals and is in compliance with the City's General Plan. Economy and Efficiency:Maintain and enhance the economy and efficiency of providing services in Rancho Palos Verdes.This criterion would include projects which improve business processes and overall efficiency while also evaluating environmental impacts. Outside Funding Committed or Eligible:Support a project which outside funding has been committed to or may be obtained through restricted revenue sources. Community Quality/Sustainability:Maintain and enhance the infrastructure and services which supports our residential and business community.This criterion would include projects which preserve and enhance the overall quality of life in Rancho Palos Verdes and projects which ensure economic viability to support a sustainable community. 4 3-10 THE CIP CALENDAR August-October November-January February-May May-June May-June Departments prepare CIP requests CIP Team reviews requests Recommendations developed to be included in the Five-Year Model and Draft Budget Planning Commission Review Recommendations presented to the City Council for approval Additional forms and methods of public outreach will be conducted as directed by the City Council. PROJECT LISTS The CIP includes a comprehensive listing of all projects contained in the Five-Year Plan and also projects beyond the five-year period.Detailed project sheets are contained in the plan for all projects included in the CIP.Another list of unfunded projects is also contained in the plan to highlight quantified projects beyond the five-year period.Projects which are included in the CIP were evaluated based on the criteria approved by the City Council and are in compliance with the goals set forth in the City's General Plan.Application of these criteria ensures that each project recommended for Council consideration does indeed support the policy objectives of the City's long-term planning documents and identifies a basis for scheduling and allocation of resources. Cost estimates have been developed for each project based on preliminary project descriptions, and include all estimated costs for land acquisition,permits and inspections,project management and project engineering,consultant design,construction,utilities,information technology infrastructure and other associated project fees.Estimates are in today's dollars. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT POLICIES Time Period The Finance and Information Technology Department,in cooperation with all other City Departments and the City Attorney,shall produce a working document designed to identify capital needs annually in conjunction with the budget process.This Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)is submitted to the City Council to utilize in reviewing and prioritizing capital projects.After adopted by Council during the budget process,the CIP becomes the City's plan for capital improvements for the next five years,adjusted annually. Type of Project Definitions Capital asset:An asset with a cost in excess of $5,000 and an expected useful life of more than one year,such as automobiles,equipment,and furniture.These items will continue to be included in the operating budget.Items such as automobiles,minor equipment,and furniture will continue to be accounted for and funded using the Equipment Replacement Fund and are not included in the capital improvement plan. Capital project:A project expected to have a useful life greater than ten years and an estimated cost of $100,000 or more.Capital projects include the construction,acquisition,or major 5 3-11 renovation of buildings,roadways,utility systems,or other structures,purchase of land,and major landscaping projects. Projects meeting the above definition will be included in the CIP document in addition to the City's budget document.The information will be tied to the capital budget and totals for each project in the CIP will be included in the capital budget. Selecting the Projects for the CIP The comprehensive capital project planning process has the following essential components: •The General Plan (Long-term Plan-10 Years) •The Capital Improvement Plan (Mid-term Plan-5 Years) •The Capital Budget (Short-term Plan-1 Year) •City Council Goals (Long-term and Short-term evaluated each year) All projects selected for the CIP should be consistent with the goals identified by the City Council or as outlined in the City's General Plan.The project selection process strives to achieve a balanced plan for the community to include all necessary and high priority projects,while also enhan'cing City services and facilities. Operating Budget Impact Identified in the CIP The operating impact of proposed capital projects,including personnel,operating expenditures, capital outlay,and debt service,as applicable,will be identified in the CIP document and considered in preparing the annual operating budget and Five-Year Financial Model. Moving Projects from the CIP to the Capital Budget All projects approved in the annual capital budget are appropriated at the estimated cost to complete the project.At the end of each fiscal year,the remaining appropriation for uncompleted portions of the project will be carried forward to subsequent fiscal years. Staff will identify the estimated costs,potential funding sources,operating impact,and project schedule for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to the City Council. Staff will coordinate development of the capital improvement budget with the development of the operating budget.All costs for internal professional services needed to implement the CIP will be included in the capital budget as part of the budget document for the years the CIP is to be implemented. Cost tracking for components of the capital improvement program will be updated semi-annually to ensure project completion against budget and established time lines. Funding of the CIP Reserve Fund through Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) On April 19,2011,the City Council adopted Policy No.41 regarding the City's Reserve Policies. Within Policy No.41,Council approved of a minimum $3 million reserve level,as well as the transfer of the total annual TOT revenue into the CIP fund,which currently is approximately $3.6 million. Definition of Capital Budget Year A capital budget year runs concurrent to the operating budget fiscal year beginning July 15t and ending June 30 th . Types of Financing The nature and cost of the project generally determines the financing options as do projected revenue resources.The following financing instruments could be used in the following preferred order: 6 3-12 •Outside funding that does not require repayment,including grants,federal,state and county restricted funding (Le.transportation funding),and donations; •Developer Fees; •City restricted revenue imposed by voters (Le.environmental excise tax,storm drain user fee); •Accumulated Fund Balances in Restricted Funds; •General Fund; •Debt secured by a Restricted Revenue Source;and •General Obligation Debt. Remaining Balances It is the City's policy to apply restricted funding sources after a project is completed and final cost is identified,or at the close of each fiscal year,whichever occurs first. Evaluation of Capital Projects Capital project and program reviews are to monitor existing project performance and to update the Fiye-Year CIP.Each project must be actively managed and semi-annual reports on the physical and fiscal status of each project should be made available to the City Council in conjunction with the budget adoption and Mid-Year Financial Review. Green Building Standards As a way to create a more sustainable way of life,the City of Rancho Palos Verdes requires the incorporation of green building principles and practices into the design,construction,and operation of all City facilities,and to evaluate all land purchases for future development on the basis of reducing environmental impacts whenever feasible. Standards for Maintenance It is important to have standards in place for the various infrastructure systems throughout the City to maintain this investment and be positioned to provide adequate services for the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes.Staff will develop maintenance standards and schedules as appropriate. Contingency Policy The need for contingencies will be evaluated with each project and be included in the CIP on a case-by-case basis. Project Change Orders Project change orders will be made in accordance with the policy stated in Section 02.44 of the Municipal Code.. GENERAL PLAN GOALS The goals stated below are included in the City's General Plan which serves as the City's long- term strategic planning tool.All CIP projects should contribute to fUlfilling one or more of the goals listed below to create a balanced,sustainable community. Natural Environment Element •It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve,protect,and enhance its natural resources,beauty,and open space for the benefit and enjoyment of its residents and the residents of the entire region.Future development shall recognize the sensitivity of the natural environmental and be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the protection of it. Socio/Cultural Element •The City shall strive to protect and preserve all significant archaeological,paleontological and historical resources within the City. 7 3-13 Cultural Resources •The City shall strive to protect and preserve all significant archaeological,paleontological and historical resources within the City. Current Social,Service,and Cultural Organizations •Work toward a coordinated program to aid in matching the facility needs of the many and diverse groups in the community with existing and future facility resources throughout the City. Social Services •Encourage programs for community involvement,participation,and action to minimize the sense of isolation and powerlessness felt by many individuals in the community. •Encourage programs for recreation,social services,and cultural and educational achievement. •Encourage a framework for interaction among the four cities of the peninsula and between the peninsula and its surrounding communities to solve common problems. Urban Environment Element •It is the goal of the City to carefully control and direct future growth towards making a positive contribution to all elements of the community.Growth in Rancho Palos Verdes should be a cautious,evolutionary process that follows a well-conceived set of general guidelines which respond to both holding capacity limitations for the region and environmental factors on the peninsula. Activity Areas •It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to preserve and enhance the community's quality living environment;to enhance the visual character and physical quality of existing neighborhoods;and to encourage the development of housing in a manner which adequately serves the needs of all present and future residents of the community. •The City shall discourage industrial and major commercial activities due to the terrain and environmental characteristics of the City.Commercial development shall be carefully and strictly controlled,and limited to consideration of convenience or neighborhood service facilities. •The City shall encourage the development of institutional facilities to serve the political, social,and cultural needs of its citizens. •The City shall endeavor to provide,develop,and maintain recreational facilities and programs of various types to provide a variety of activities for persons of all age groups and in all areas of the community. •Agricultural uses within the City shall be encouraged,since they are desirable for resource management and open space. Infrastructure •It shall be a goal of the City to ensure adequate public utilities and communications services to all residents,while maintaining the quality of the environment. •It shall be a goal of the City to provide residents with a safe and efficient system of roads, trails and paths. 8 3-14 •It shall be a goal of the City to encourage the increased mobility of residents through the development of an adequate public transportation system. Safety •It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of life and property from both natural and man-made hazards within the community. •It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of the public through effective law enforcement and fire protection programs. •It shall be a goal of the City to develop and enforce health and sanitation,emergency communications,and disaster preparedness programs to ensure the overall health and safety of all residents. •It shall be a goal of the City to protect life and property and reduce adverse economic, environmental,and social impacts resulting from any geologic activity. Sensory Environment •It shall be the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes through proper land use planning and regulations,to provide for a quiet and serene residential community with a minimum of restriction on citizen activity. •Palos Verdes peninsula is graced with views and vistas of the surrounding Los Angeles basin and coastal region.Because of its unique geographic form and coastal resources, these views and vistas are a significant resource to residents and too many visitors,as they provide a rare means of experiencing the beauty of the peninsula and the Los Angeles region.It is the responsibility of the City to preserve these views and vistas for the public benefit and,where appropriate,the City should strive to enhance and restore these resources,the visual character of the City,and provide and maintain access for the benefit and enjoyment of the public. Land Use Plan •It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to provide for land uses which will be sensitive to and enhance the natural environment and character of the community,supply appropriate facilities to serve residents and visitors,promote a range of housing types, promote fiscal balance,and protect the general health,safety,and welfare of the community. Fiscal Element •It shall be a goal of the City to hold the property tax to a minimum and to continually explore and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of alternate or new sources of revenue. •It shall be a goal of the City to explore cooperative financing strategies that might be undertaken in association with other jurisdictions. •It shall be a goal of the City to take maximum advantage of regulatory legislation to obtain contributions,dedications and reservations (Le.,easements). •It shall be a goal of the City to ascertain that all revenues generated by growth are sufficient to cover costs related to growth. •It shall be a goal of the City to thoroughly evaluate capital acquisition and operating expenditures and their impacts before implementation of programs. 9 3-15 (THIS PAGE IS BLANK) 10 3-16 FUNDED PROJECTS The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs through various planning processes along with a proposed funding source. Because the City Council approves CIP projects for the upcoming year,proposed future funding sources could change in subsequent years. 11 3-17 Rancho Palos Verdes Five Y,,-ar CaPi.-t"'.I_mprovement Plan·Funded Council I I Project 'Page Safety Goal Priority FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 Identified Funding Source BuildiflQ$andOtller Facility Improvements »>......13 .,...............» Citywide ADA Transition Plan Implementation X $400,000 $400,000 $200,000 $150,000 $150,000 EET/CIP Reserves,CDBG funds Fiber Optic Cabling:Hesse Park/Ryan Park $60,000 $260,000 CIP Reserve Fiber Optic -Ab Cove Sewer Lift Stations/Shoreline Park/Ladera Linda $1,600,000 CIP Reserve Hesse Park Multi Purpose Room Improvements $250,000 CIP Reserve Ladera Linda Community Center Buildings Replacement ,X $4,000,000 CIP Reserve > Pavement Management Program Update X X 1$120,000 CIP accumulated balance I Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 9 X X $1,900,000 General Fund,TDA Article 3 funds Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 2 &6 X X $2,100,000 General Fund,TDA Article 3 funds Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 7 X X $1,800,000 General Fund,TDA Article 3 funds Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 8 X X $1,800,000 General Fund,TDA Article 3 funds Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 3 &4 X X $2,100,000 General Fund,TDA Article 3 funds Arterial Rehabilitation -Miraleste Drive X X $70,000 $2,630,000 Measure R,Prop A,Prop C,CIP Reserve Arterial Rehabilitation -Crenshaw Boulevard X X $70,000 $2,730,000 Measure R,Prop A,Prop C,CIP Reserve Arterial Rehabilitation -Indian Peak Road X X $1,500,000 Measure R,Prop C,CIP Reserve PVDS -East End of Landslide X X $500,000 CIP Reserve PVDE Bronco -Headland Safety Improvements X X $41,700 $500,300 HSIP,General Fund (90/10) PVDS Road Way Realignment and Drainage Project X X $245,000 $3,510,000 CIP Reserve PVDE Multi Modal Improvements x x $3,200,000 Grant 80120 match,CIP Reserve Western Avenue Traffic Improvements x x $3,200,000 50-50 cost share,CIP Reserve Crenshaw Boulevard Undergrounding $1,200,000 I Rule 20A funds I I Stonn Drain Lining X X $329,881 $335,278 $340,836 $347,653 $350,000 WQFP User Fees PVDS (East of Barkentine)X X $446,000 WQFP User Fees South HawthorneNia Frascati X X $440,000 WQFP User Fees Marguerite Open Channel X X $350,000 WQFP User Fees New Landslide Dewatering Wells (2)X X $170,000 I CIP Reserve I Drainage Area Monitoring System $200,000 $300,000 I ICIP Reserve Stonn Water Quality Regional Improvement Project $200,000 $300,000 I CIP Reserve I I I Basswood Avenue X X $114,000 CIP Reserve West General Street X X $122,000 CIP Reserve Abalone Cove X X $567,000 CIP Reserve Ironwood Street X X $247,275 CIP Reserve PVDS at Schooner Drive X X $603,000 CIP Reserve PVDS at Sea Cove Drive X X $199,000 CIP Reserve Ginger Root Lane X X $203,000 CIP Reserve Malaga Canyon X X - $407,000 CIP Reserve Miscellaneous Projects X X i $465,000 CIP Reserve Recreatlon;Plllli$;.lIl1d.OP!!ri.S""~··.··:·» Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Parking Lot Improvement !$332,000 CIP Reserves,Quimby Funds Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Staff Building,Restrooms and Driveway Improvements X I -f!---!08,000 CIP Reserves,Quimby Funds Hesse Park Parking Lot Resurfacing $190,000 CIP Reserves,Quimby Funds Point Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC)Building Identification Sign/Screening Wall 1 $110,000 I CIP Reserves,Quimby Funds Ryan Park Parking Lot Expansion X -n--400,000 !CIP Reserves,Quimby Funds X r----------' Salvation Anny Trail i$103,000 CIP Reserves,Quimby Funds --,i,',»>$9;151,856 $10,575,278 $6,841,1361$5,492,653 $-t~~;ljOO"> 3 - 1 8 BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS Buildings and other facility improvements may include any proposed new City facility or renovation or improvement of any existing City facilities.The City owns and maintains twelve public buildings,including: •City Hall Administration Building at Upper Point Vicente Park •City Hall Community Development Building at Upper Point Vicente Park •City Hall trailer leased by Palos Verdes on the Net at Upper Point Vicente Park •City Hall Emergency Communications Center trailer at Upper Point Vicente Park •Fred Hesse Jr.Community Center Building •Pointe Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC)at Lower Point Vicente Park •Robert Ryan Park Building •Ladera Linda Community Center Buildings (5) •Cable Television Building Studio Except for PVIC,these buildings are 25 years old or older and showing the signs of daily use.Many of the facilities were purchased from the school district or transferred to the City from the federal government,and little to no improvements have been made since their acquisition.It is important to perform adequate maintenance to extend the life of these facilities.It will be necessary to renovate these buildings as they age to meet the needs of the community and ensure that all building and safety guidelines are satisfied.PVIC,the most recently remodeled City facility,was built in 1984 and expanded in 2005.The City Hall buildings and Ladera Linda Community Center buildings are the best examples of buildings that are in great need of renovation to meet organizational needs, comply with safety and code requirements,and comply with all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)guidelines.The projects listed on the following pages have been developed based on individual staff assessments,input from the community and professional consultants'assessments and studies. In November 2010,the City's consultants completed a Civic Center Facilities Assessment,which offered alternatives and general cost estimates for building improvements to serve municipal functions,as well as optional public amenities with a view to the long-term needs of the City.The alternatives identified range widely from a "no-frills"stru.ctural,HVAC and ADA retrofit to the existing administration facility--to newly-constructed civic facilities which could incorporate community-serving amenities (public meeting rooms,community center, etc.).In light of competing CIP demands,the City Council has directed Staff to focus on cost-effective renovation of existing City Hall buildings.Therefore,the full- expansion,new construction alternative is not included in the Unfunded List.The City Council ad-hoc subcommittee for the Upper Point Vicente/Civic Center Master Plan is working with Staff on a critical needs assessment,including the seismic retrofit of City Hall buildings,improvements to address ADA compliance 13 3-19 throughout the campus,as well as heating,ventilation,and air conditioning.Once those projects are fully considered by the Council,the project description and associated costs will be incorporated in accordance with Council's direction into the CIP schedule. 14 3-20 PROJECT:CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION TYPE:Buildings and Other Facility Improvements LOCATION:Various DEPARTMENT:Public works The Citywide ADA Transition Plan identifies projects with total cost estimates of $11.8 million.This estimate includes $2.6 million of roadway curb ramps and bus stops to be addressed with future roadway projects;$1.7 million of access improvements at Ladera Linda to be addressed with any future rehabilitation of the Ladera Linda Community Center;and $1.3 million of access improvements at the Civic Center to be addressed with any future DESCRIPTION:rehabilitation of the City Hall campus. The remaining $6.2 million of identified projects are to improve ADA compliance at various other City-owned properties.The projects totaling $1.3 million scheduled for the next five years are from this list,and address issues categorized as "potential hazard" and "severe".The remaining $4.9 million of this list,as well as the amounts noted above for roadways,Ladera Linda,and the Civic Center remain unfunded. PROJECT COSTESTIMATES(IFKNOVVN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $35,000 $35,000 $17,500 $10,000 $10,000 CONSTRUCTION $365,000 $365,000 $282,500 $140,000 $140,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAl.•••••••••••••••••••••i>1 >............>i 150,000 I ••••••••••••• i ······</i ....................................> •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ..... Funding Source:The CIP Reserve funded with General Fund Money,EET and CDBG grants. JUSTIFICATION FOftlNCI..USION ON6veAftClP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECTINFO·RMATION: 15 3-21 PROJECT:FIBER OPTIC CABLING:HESSE/RYAN PARK TYPE:Buildings and Other Facility Improvements LOCATION:Hesse Park/Ryan Park DEPARTMENT:Finance and Information Technology This project includes the installation of fiber optic cabling for the City's phone and information network between City facilities within the public right-of-way which will run adjacent to Ryan Park and directly on to Hesse Park. DESCRIPTION:To reduce costs,this project will be strategically aligned with the Hawthorne Traffic Signal Synchronization Project that will begin in 2013 to take advantage of the asphalt being dug up from the other project.Vaults will be placed adjacent to the roadway within the public right-of-way. DDn ,lv"";:,I ......(I'"<««. <••'••.•',.••."•.••<«<\.'.....'...".,"..••".yEAR$ ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $60,000 CONSTRUCTION $260,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL $,60,QOO $260,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATION fOR4NCl..USION ON5YEARCIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITIED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: 16 3-22 FIBER OPTIC CABLING:ABALONE PROJECT:COVE SEWER LIFT STATIONSI SHORELINE PARK/LADERA LINDA TYPE:Buildings and Other Facility Improvements LOCATION:Ladera Linda/Abalone Cove Shoreline Park DEPARTMENT:Finance and Information Technology This project includes the installation of fiber optic cabling for unified communications and data transmission between remote City park and infrastructure facilities and the Civic Center administration facility.It is essential to establish communications to Abalone Cove Shore Line Park,the Abalone Cove Sewer Lift Stations and Ladera Linda Park.Improved connectivity with Ladera Linda is essential to provide full communication services to the eastside community park in conjunction with its rehabilitation.The entire fiber optic run could occur by a combination of aerial and underground line placement. The project includes running a single line of fiber optic cabling on its DESCRIPTION:own network from City Hall to Abalone Cove Shoreline Park, Abalone Cove Sewer lift stations and on to Ladera Linda Park,with the cost of approximately $1.6M.The work would entail installing 24-48 strand fiber in 3"conduit within the public right of way along Palos Verdes Drive South by either open cut or boring construction methods. Due to challenges with running fiber through the landslide area,the option of leasing fiber from an Internet Service Provider between the Civic Center and Ladera Linda will be included in the scope of the project.Cox Communications currently has fiber that connects to users along the road adjacent to Ladera Linda. < < ...........</< ······YEAR5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $1,600,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL ••••••••••••• .... •••••••'<<'...•••$"l:iIn niln I Mf>ACTON <...............................</< ••••• ....... Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATION.·FOR.·INCLU$lON·ON··S••VEAR.·CIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITIED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X OTHERf>ROJECTINFORMATION: 17 3-23 PROJECT:HESSE PARK MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM IMPROVEMENTS TYPE:Maintenance/Upgrade LOCATION:Hesse Park DEPARTMENT:RPVTV The Hesse Park Multi-Purpose Room is used for City Council meetings,Planning Commission meetings as well as numerous other uses that are broadcast on public television.The lighting, the background,and the cameras need to be replaced to make these public meetings more visually appealing.The new cameras DESCRIPTION:would be High Definition (HD)and would require full HD integration of the directors booth or production control (the black room).This would require an upgrade including,but not limited to, an audio mixer,HD remote camera cables,digital video switcher, live video feed distribution computer,on air graphics computer, diqital back UP system and DVD burners. PROJECT·COST.ESTIMATES••(IP·.KNOVVN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $250,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL .......••••• .....UN ............•.•••..>.................".~ Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. •....11 < •••• SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VI nCI'\DDt"'I >•••••••••••••••••»......<><•.•.••>...... 18 3-24 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: LADERA LINDA PARK &COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDINGS REPLACEMENT Buildings and Other Facility Improvements Ladera Linda Park Public Works The initial stage of this project,for which a budget is appropriated, is to create a master plan which will lay the groundwork for the site's long-term redevelopment and phased implementation.This stage involves a study of community needs through public outreach along with contemplating the City's needs for public service facilities.This work will be followed by programming, quantifying the needs,planning and preparing a feasibility report to create a master plan which can be phased for design and construction. The cost calculation for Ladera Linda Buildings Replacement DESCRIPTION:project is based on an estimated need for 12,000 square-feet of buildings to replace the existing 18,000 square-feet.The anticipated square footage can cover park restrooms,a staff building,multipurpose room,activity rooms,discovery room and a Park Ranger/Deputy Sheriff drop-in office.Other improvements include park grounds landscaping &irrigation,picnic tables, benches and an emergency generator.The project can be divided in three phases.The first phase will include Hazmat abatement, removal of all buildings,installation of all utility infrastructures,the construction of 6,000 SF of new building,park grounds, landscaping &improvements.The second and third phase will include 3,000 SF of new buildings each. PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 6 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $4,000,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL I I $4,000,000 IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. Phase I -$4 Million in CIP Reserves Total Cost:$7.2 Million JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ONS YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: 19 . ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY x X 3-25 INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY Intangible Capital Outlay improvements may not have significant physical substance,but they have more than minimal value and help the City in improving operations or planning for·the future.Projects that could be classified as intangible capital outlay include the update or development of major planning processes and documents,significant software purchases that may improve the efficiency of business processes or large technology purchases that may improve or enhance service delivery to citizens.This category includes an update to the Pavement Management Program. 20 3-26 PROJECT:PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE TYPE:Intangible Capital Outlay LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works The Pavement Management System (PMS)is updated every three years to evaluate the condition of the City's roadway system and to DESCRIPTION:identify Citywide Arterial Rehabilitation and Residential Rehabilitation projects.The Metropolitan Transit Authority (Metro) requires the PMS update in order for the City to continue receiving Proposition C monies. \.i\')~l .ii iii .......iii .......... i Y15ARf ll::;AI'(i'll::;AI'("YEAR 4 YEAR 5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $120,000 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL .TQTAL i •••••••••••••••••••••••••• i i i ••••••••iii i _ii .............iii iii ......ii ·.··...iIlVI....A .....""...'W'. Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATION FORI NCLUSION ON 5YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATIoN:.... 21 3-27 ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE Roadway infrastructure is one of the most widely used major capital investments of a municipality.Without a well-maintained street system,the transportation needs of the public,business,industry and government cannot be met.The roads are also part of a critical public safety need,as they contribute to the general health and welfare of the community.Maintaining quality roadway infrastructure is also important for maintaining property values.It has been shown that property values tend to suffer from adjacent poorly maintained streets.Roadway infrastructure includes residential streets,arterial streets and traffic safety improvements.In the City of Rancho Palos Verdes,there are 33.68 miles of arterial streets,6.46 miles of collector streets and 103.31 miles of residential streets.The total for all streets and alleys mileage is 143.44 centerline miles. To manage the City's residential and arterial streets,the City hires a consultant that completes a full-detailed assessment of all streets every three years.This report,known as the Pavement Management System,helps to identify any serious issues and provides the City with a rating for each street.The report includes the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI).The City of Rancho Palos Verdes maintains a minimum standard for PCI for a municipal street system at 80.The City's current PCI is 84.2 based upon the PMS report prepared by Willdan &Associates in 2009.Since 1997,the City has maintained a pavement rating between 80 and 90.The report also helps in defining a schedule to complete the work.The City has been divided into nine zones for residential streets,but in the case of some areas,zones may be completed together in one year for added efficiency. 22 3-28 PROJECT:RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION TYPE:Roadway Infrastructure LOCATION:Zone 9 DEPARTMENT:Public Works DESCRIPTION: ACQUISITION As part of the City's Pavement Management System (PMS),Zone 9 of the residential rehabilitation program is scheduled for implementation during the FY13-14 budget cycle.This project will include micro-surfacing,slurry seal,overlay,curb repair,root removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zone 9.This infrastructure enhancement will also include u datin traffic si ns,stri in curb aintin and house numberin . ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $1,900,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT Funding and/or Grant Information:General Fund and TDA Article 3 for $26,586 JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITIED/ELIGIBLE XCOMMUNITYQUALITY/SUSTAINABILITYSUPPORTSCITYCOUNCILGOALSX This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for completion in FY13-14.This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 87 percent or higher. Zone 9:Composed of streets on the eastern side of the City including neighborhoods such as Eastview, South Eastview,Peninsula Verde and Rolling Hills Riviera. 23 3-29 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITAliON Roadway Infrastructure Zone 2 &6 Public Works As part of the City's Pavement Management System (PMS),Zone 2 &6 of the residential rehabilitation program are scheduled for implementation during the FY14-15 budget cycle.This project will include slurry seal,overlay,curb repair,root removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zones 2 &6. This infrastructure enhancement will also include updating traffic si ns,stri in ,curb aintin and house numberin . PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT YEAR 2 $2,100,000 YEAR3 YEAR 4 YEARS Funding and/or Grant Information:General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000 JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for completion in FY14-15.This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 87 percent or higher. Zone 2:Residential streets in the northwestern part of the City between Crest Road and Grayslake Road, east and west of Hawthorne Blvd. Zone 6:Residential streets in the southern part of the City encompassing all neighborhoods to the east of Point Vicente Park and west of Trump National including Crestmont,Tramonto,Seaview,Barkentine, Seacove,Wayfarer's Chapel,the Landslide Zone and Portuguese Bend neighborhoods. 24 3-30 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION Roadway Infrastructure Zone 7 Public Works As part of the City's Pavement Management System (PMS),Zone 7 of the residential rehabilitation program is scheduled for implementation during the FY15-16 budget cycle.This project will include micro-surfacing,slurry seal,overlay,curb repair,root removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zone 7.This infrastructure enhancement will also include updating traffic signs,striping,curb painting and house numberin PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 ACQUISITlbN ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT YEAR 2 YEAR 3 $1,800,000 YEAR 5 Funding and/or Grant Information:General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000 JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for completion in FY15-16.This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 87 percent or higher. Zone 7:The Ladera Linda community,Ganado Area,streets near Mira Catalina School,San Ramon and Calle Aventura. 25 3-31 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT RESIDENTIAL REHABiliTATION Roadway Infrastructure Zone 8 Public Works As part of the City's Pavement Management System (PMS),Zone 8 of the residential rehabilitation program is scheduled for implementation during the FY16-17 budget cycle.This project will include micro-surfacing,slurry seal,overlay,curb repair,root removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zone 8.This infrastructure enhancement will also include u datin traffic si stri in curb aintin and house numberin . YEARS $1,800,000 Funding and/or Grant Information:General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000 JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for completion in FY16-17.This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 87 percent or higher. Zone 8:Residential neighborhoods off of Palos Verdes Drive East in the northern and eastern parts of the City .. 26 3-32 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL REHABiliTATION Roadway Infrastructure Zone 3 &4 Public Works As part of the City's Pavement Management System (PMS), Zones 3 & 4 of the residential rehabilitation program is scheduled for implementation during the FY17-18 budget cycle.This project will include micro-surfacing,slurry seal,overlay,curb repair,root removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zones 3 &4.This infrastructure enhancement will also include updating traffic signs,striping,curb painting and house numberin . PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 $2,100,000 Funding and/or Grant Information:General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $25,000 JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X OTHER ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for completion in FY17-18.This project is funded by General Fund monies and ensures a safety rating of 85 ercent or hi her. Zone 3:Residential streets north of Silverspur Rd and east of Hawthorne Blvd,inclUding the Blackhorse community,Silver Arrow,Longhill and Beechgate Zone 4:Residential streets bordering Crenshaw Blvd and Crest Road,including the Sea Crest,Sea Breeze,Island View,and Ridgecrest communities 27 3-33 PROJECT:ARTERIAL REHABILITATION - MIRALESTE DRIVE TYPE:Roadway Infrastructure LOCATION:Miraleste Drive DEPARTMENT:Public Works As part of the City's Pavement Management System (PMS), DESCRIPTION:Miraleste Drive arterial will be resurfaced.The project will include milling and overlay,roadway patching,crack filling,curb and gutter repair,sidewalk repair and ADA upgrades. ggh"·_...._....................<..•.••«<v".,..... •\,,1\1 >>i .••••</.............!M::AD?....>YIl1AR:\ye;AFt4·ye;AR5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $70,000 $2,630,000 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL fC I-A / i"••••••••••••••••••••••• .............1«•••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••• >.//••••••>>..••••< •••••......~_.-'~"". Funding and/or Grant Information:Proposition C,Proposition A,Measure Rand CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATION ••FOR ••INCI.U$ION.ON·.S.YEAR.cIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X ·UI <i/i/></...•.•> •••• ...... 28 3-34 PROJECT:ARTERIAL REHABILITATION - CRENSHAW BLVD TYPE:Roadway Infrastructure LOCATION:Crenshaw Blvd. DEPARTMENT:Public Works As part of the City's Pavement Management System (PMS), DESCRIPTION:Crenshaw Blvd.arterial will be resurfaced.The project will include milling and overlay,roadway patching,crack filling,curb and gutter repair,sidewalk repair and ADA upgrades . .........••·./><>ii .//•..•••••..../•••••"..,.-...,......,\ > ••••••</<>••.••........./>»VI::AD?1<VCADA <YEAR 5......,..'¥ ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $70,000 $2,730,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL....... •••• ••.••••>... •••••••••• ~.I"'.I,IUI!<1:').,.~n nnn I'YIPA_T ON_.«/••.•••.•..•.••.••..•..••/< ••••••• / Funding and/or Grant Information:Proposition C,Measure Rand CIP Reserves JUSTIFICATION FOR1NCl.USIONON5YEARcIP ............ .............. SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: 29 3-35 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: ARTERIAL REHABILITATION -INDIAN PEAK ROAD Roadway Infrastructure Indian Peak Road Public Works As part of the City's Pavement Management System (PMS), Indian Peak Road arterial will be resurfaced.The project will include milling and overlay,roadway patching,crack filling,curb and gutter repair,sidewalk repair and ADA upgrades. PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL V"'A""...V"'A""3,....."...T 1:::1"\"-YEAR 4 YEAR 5 $1,500,000 Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve and Measure R funds. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: 30 ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X 3-36 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: PVDS -EAST END OF LANDSLIDE Roadway Infrastructure N/A Public Works This project will realign the east end of the landslide road along PVDS to correct for the land movement that has taken place over the past several years.The left and right turning deflections within the traveled way will be removed and the roadway will be moved back into the right-of-way along the eastern 800 feet of the landslide road. PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 ACQUISITION YEAR2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEARS ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL.......•••~I $50,000 $450,000 ....nn nnll Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VI _•••.•<>//<••..•••..«/ This project will correct the unsafe condition that has developed at the east end of the landslide road.The roadway in this area has migrated onto the Palos Verdes Bay Club property;the realignment will correct this problem as well. Construction estimate is approximately $450,000 due to the addition of the Gateway parking lot and mitigation required for a fissure in the project area. 31 3-37 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT BRONCO DRIVE Traffic Improvements PVDE @ Bronco Drive Public Works Improve portions of PVDE to provide wider travel lanes in each direction,a shared use equestrian and pedestrian path located behind the existing guardrail,a high visibility equestrian crossing at Bronco Drive complete with flashing beacons,augmented crossing signage and advanced crossing signage with flashing beacons,installation of safety barriers and railing to reduce vehicle collisions and cross-over accidents YEAR 5 $41,700 $500,300 LEGAL Staff attained an HSIP grant that entails a 10%local match from CIP Reserve.The total project cost is $542,000 with a local match of $487,800. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLESUPPORTSESSENTIALCITYSERVICES SUPPORTS COUNCIL GOALS 32 3-38 PROJECT:PVDS ROADWAY REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE PROJECT TYPE:Landslide Project LOCATION:PVDS DEPARTMENT:Public Works The PVDS Roadway Realignment project and the Ski Jump Drainage project would be designed through this project.The project would aid in the passive drainage of runoff that is now trapped due to ground movement and re-align approximately 1.6 miles of Palos Verdes Drive South which is located within and DESCRIPTION:traverses the Abalone Cove,Portuguese Bend,and Klondike Canyon Landslides.The location of the roadway is constantly moving as the sub-soils within the landslide move.Extensive grading is needed to re-establish (relocate)the roadway within the right-of-way.The preliminary estimated design cost for these projects are $245,000,with construction costs of $3,51 0,000. oonlF:C~T '-...._i ii i)·•••••• ·•.•.•·Tl:Af'(O ••••••••• ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $245,000 CONSTRUCTION $3,510,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL $24~,OOO 1""""""".",,,,,,,..........i IMPACT ON OPERATING13UDGET Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFiCATION FOR.INCI..QSIQN QN6Y.EAR.CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X OTHER PROJECTINFOR.MATION:.. •••••• ...i)..•..•• Design for the PVDS re-alignment and drainage project is required in FY 13-14 to accommodate the needed roadway alignment and drainage project in FY 14-15. 33 3-39 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: PVDE MULTI-MODAL IMPROVEMENTS Roadwa Infrastructure PVDE Various Locations Public Works As part of the Palos Verdes Drive East Preliminary Study,the report concluded that implementation of four (4)priority projects will help achieve a multi-modal status. YEAR 2 YEAR 3 $3,200,000 YEAR4 YEARS Staff attained an 80/20 grant.The City's local match of $640,000 will be funded through the CIP Reserve JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X X 34 3-40 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT WESTERN AVENUE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS (2007 WESTERN AVE. CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN Roadway Infrastructure Western Avenue Public Works The Western Avenue Task Force group was formed consisting of RPV,City LA,and Caltrans.Since its inception,the working group completed a Western Avenue Corridor Study which is a strategic action plan that: •Identified the current and future deficiencies in the multi-modal transportation system within the corridor •Recommended consensus-based solutions (including required strate ies to address the deficiencies.;;';;;';~========----j YEARS 3,200,000 50-50 sharing agreement with City contribution coming from CIP Reserve. SAFETY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES SUPPORTS COUNCIL GOALS WESTERN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY 35 x x 3-41 PROJECT:CRENSHAW BLVD UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT TYPE:Public Utilities LOCATION:Crenshaw Blvd at Crest Road DEPARTMENT:Public Works DESCRIPTION: The project will underground overhead utility lines along Crenshaw Blvd south of Crest Road.This project qualifies for Rule 20A funding. ACQUISITION YEAR 5 ENGINEERING/DESIGN $120,000 CONSTRUCTION $1,080,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL There is no impact on the operating budget.This project is entirely funded by Rule 20A funds. x x x SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES SUPPORTS COUNCIL GOALS==-'"'.,....,.,..".,....,.,..".,..........Je,.....,-.,....,.,.."~.,....,.,..,,.,....,.,..,,;...........;..;.....,...;.,..=-=,.,:-;:.===;..........-=.,....,.,..,,-'---I SAFETY 37 3-42 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM In June 2004,the City's consulting engineers prepared an Update to the Storm Drain Master Plan.The updated plan identified serious storm drain deficiencies that required significant repair.The update identified 38 high-priority projects, which were the basis for establishing a "user fee."Since then,some projects have been completed,and others have been reassessed to meet changing priorities and needs.The 38 projects have been reevaluated resulting in grouping the projects into 12 project areas.These are based on identifiable drainage areas/systems,most of which are tied to natural canyon drainage systems.Each project has been grouped into a project area.The areas are as follows: Area 1: Area'2: Area 3: Area 4: Area 5: Area 6: Area 7: Area 8: Area 9: Area 10: Area 11: Area 12: Sunnyside Ridge McCarrell Canyon Storm Drain System Lower San Ramon CanyonlTarapaca Canyon Altamira Canyon Palos Verdes Drive East/Miraleste Canyon San Pedro and Averill Canyons Via Colin ita Vickery Canyon Miraleste and Chandeleur Palos Verdes Drive East Switchbacks Hawthorne Boulevard Palos Verdes Drive South Citywide Storm Drain Programs 38 3-43 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: STORM DRAIN LINING Storm Drain System Project Area 12 Public Works All CMP storm drain lines within the City have reached their design life expectancy and need to be lined to extend their life another 30+years.CMP dating back to the 1940s have been discovered and require maintenance along with those most recently installed in the 1970s.A large number of drainage problems citywide can be overcome by relining deteriorated pipes and improving inlets and outlet structures. DESCRIPTION: PROJECT COST ESTIMATES IF KNOWN CATEGORY YEAR 1 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEARS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $329,881 $335,278 $340,836 $347,653 Funding and/or Grant Information:WQFP user fees.Ongoing maintenance costs should decrease,as pipes which have been lined generally require less maintenance resulting in a cost savings.Because the Storm Drain User Fee sunsets in FY15-16,funding sources will have to be identified to fund further storm drain lining projects JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X X 39 3-44 PROJECT:PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH (EAST OF BARKENTINE) TYPE:Storm Drain System LOCATION:Project Area 11 DEPARTMENT:Public Works This project area includes several storm drain systems that cross DESCRIPTION:Palos Verdes Drive South at various locations.Drainage capacity will be increased with improvement to inlets and outlet structures. ••••••••)•••••••••)i)<> ••••••i »........""",""Yl:AFtS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $446,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL <i ...·..i'".ft"'....ii iii ••••••••.................. I ••"'."''''ON ·..···.·.»i».......'"~_I ....,I .··i·...... Funding and/or Grant Information:WQFP user fees JUSTIFICATION••FOR ••'NCLUS1ON ••ON••S.VEAR.C1P /" SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X VincI"(i •••••••••••••• ..... 40 3-45 PROJECT:SOUTH HAWTHORNENIA FRASCATI TYPE:Storm Drain System LOCATION:Project Area 10 DEPARTMENT:Public Works This project will improve drainage across Hawthorne Boulevard by replacing two existing 18"pipes with one 24"and one 30"RCP pipes.Additionally,a second location on South Hawthorne will be DESCRIPTION:evaluated after episodes of flooding in recent years.A curb and gutter project on Via Frascati will serve to direct drainage into the street and existing catch basins,which drain into the San Pedro Canyon. PROJECTCOST12STINlATES(IFKNOV\lN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR4 YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION 440,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL ••••••......<!...........i>,.....................>>><.... >,........":T •• «......>< ••••• ,..r>................,.- Funding and/or Grant Information:WQFP user fees JUSTIFICATION·FOR INCL.USIONON5YE.ARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X Vlna:::",<.>........<><» •••••••••........<••••• 41 3-46 PROJECT:MARGUERITE OPEN CHANNEL TYPE:Storm Drain System LOCATION:Between PVDW and the Bluff DEPARTMENT:Public works Staff has become aware of excessive erosion in a portion of open natural drainage channel,which connects two piped systems DESCRIPTION:between PVDW and the bluff.Studies of the issue are scheduled for FY 12-13 with implementation of any recommendations for improvement tentatively scheduled the following year. PROJECT COST ESTfMATESJIFKNOVVN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERI,NG/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $350,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL •TOTAL .··.··.//i .....>••••••••• ....... •••••••••i ....1 W ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• /.....//>/.i>..... Funding and/or Grant Information:WQFP user fees JUSTIFiCATION FOR INCLUSION ONS YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY XQUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY UIMCI"'t i i iii .... 42 3-47 LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS The City's Landslide Mitigation Projects refers to projects that lessen the effect of erosion on the Portuguese Bend Landslide,which is continuously active landslide in the United States. 43 3-48 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: . r-A ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT INSTALLATION OF LANDSLIDE DEWATERING WELLS (2) Landslide Project N/A Public Works Dewatering Wells are a high priority and are considered to be the next most effective method of minimizing runoff from entering the landslide,which helps slow land movement within the landslide. All runoff that percolates into the ground eventually becomes part of the groundwater and will cause an increase in the depth of the groundwater table.Removing groundwater through dewatering wells helps to lower the groundwater table,relieving soil pressures at depth and minimizing the negative effects groundwater has on the landslide.Three new upslope wells in Portuguese Bend and two new wells in Abalone Cove are initially planned during this phase of the system's expansion.These new wells should improve the system's effectiveness by increasing the system's water removal capacity and by removing water more rapidly.Two new dewatering well projects should be scheduled annually until the five have been installed.The cost to install each well is estimated to be !l:R!'l nnn .................·..·.i.·.·.·..·.·i...ii ··ii ·.·..·i.........·.·.·.i ··..·i..... I I ;;;1'{1 ..- • -.:::,;~::YEAR 5 $170,000 LEGAL TOTAL n.~_I "'" Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. V,,,,,,._~._ SAFETY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: x x x ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY 44 x 3-49 STORM WATER QUALITY In order to comply with the new MS4 Permit requirements,the Peninsula cities are working together to address storm water quality issues by developing an Enhanced Watershed Management Plan,including the development of a structural treatment project and to monitor water quality in storm drain outfalls in both dry and wet weather.To meet data standards,it is anticipated that automated data collection systems will need to be designed and installed in several locations in the various watersheds of the City. 45 3-50 PROJECT:DRAINAGE AREA MONITORING SYSTEM TYPE:Stormwater Quality Project LOCATION:City wide,at storm drain outfalls DEPARTMENT:Public Works In response to a new MS4 permit requirement,the City will need to monitor water quality in storm drain outfalls in both dry and wet DESCRIPTION:weather.To meet data standards,it is anticipated that automated data collection systems will need to be designed and installed in several locations in the various watersheds of the City. •010"'.1 "'Y\:)1 <><•••••><< ••••••• •••• ~i <>1><••••••.........."',.."" ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN 50,000 50,000 CONSTRUCTION 150,000 200,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT 50,000 LEGAL TOTAl.••••••••••• ............ '.....A";r ......'>.............,-,....... Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATIONFQRINCLUSIONON6YEARCIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X ulnc:"-..........••••••.•••<••••••<>.••••••••. This project is required as part of the MS4 Permit 46 3-51 PROJECT:STORM WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TYPE:Stormwater Quality Project LOCATION:TBD DEPARTMENT:Public Works In order to comply with the new MS4 Permit requirements,the Peninsula cities will work together to address storm water quality issues by developing an Enhanced Watershed Management Plan, DESCRIPTION:including the development of a structural treatment project.This is an estimate of the City's share of the cost to build a Storm Water Quality improvement project.The project must be built within 30 months of receipt of the water quality monitorina results. Dl:)t"\JECT ........,\;>...""~••f1'"••••••••••••/></i > •••••••••••••••><<.•••.•Il:AD"<....... ••••••• ................................. YEAR<..•••.•.;'Y1»><>·····IYt:~t('f 5>•••••••• ....... ACQUISITION 50,000 ENGINEERING/DESIGN 50,000 50,000 CONSTRUCTION 100,000 200,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT 50,000 LEGAL TOTAL.••••»/i ><. •••••••• <••••••••••••....... •••••..•,.,1 ...............»...../ •••.... Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON5YEARCIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X ..."n ....n.I ><......><>.....><>>.••••.•.••••••> Required as part of MS4 Permit Enhanced Watershed Management Plan.Location to be determined once pollutant monitoring studies are underway. 47 3-52 SEWER PROJECTS The City's sanitary sewer system is essential for City operations,yet it has not required significant expenditures in past years due to an inter-local agreement with Los Angeles County for maintenance activities.The City owns the system, but the County has the primary responsibility for ongoing maintenance.The County collects a sewer fee from the City's property owners that Staff believes is inadequate to maintain the system.Although the County maintains the City's sewer system,the City retains responsibility for its operation,public safety and welfare.The City,not the County,maintains legal and regulatory responsibility (Le.any state or federal fines resulting from spillage). In preparation for this change,the City conducted a survey of the system,and in 2004 the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan was created to help in the management of this asset.The study examined sample areas throughout the City and assessed the overall system as "fair."The inspection revealed root intrusion in the pipes and cracking in the pipes,in addition to accumulated fats and grease clogging certain areas.It appeared that the County had not been performing adequate maintenance over the years.Without regular maintenance,overflows due to root and grease blockages will occur.To minimize the potential for overflow and to restore and maintain the system in "good"condition,a significant investment in pipeline inspection,repair and maintenance is required.The projects identified herein were included in the City's Wastewater Master Plan Update which was completed in 2009.The City's desire to contribute to a more proactive approach to maintenance of the City's sewer system was originally funded in FY07- 08.The program account for the cost of updating the Sewer System Master Plan,industrial waste monitoring,filming,and investigating,cleaning sewer pipes,and addressing capacity issues throughout the City.Not only does this work enable the City to propose capital improvement projects to the County and perform small crack repair discovered during pipe filming,any roots or obstructions discovered during the video inspections are removed which minimizes the opportunity for overflows 48 3-53 PROJECT:SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT- BASSWOOD AVENUE TYPE:Sewer System LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works DESCRIPTION: This section of the City's sewer system has been determined to be under capacity.This project will replace 564 feet of 8 inch sewer pipe.The pipe will be replaced with a 12 inch vitrified clay pipeline.The pipeline runs along Basswood Avenue between Mossbank Drive and Shorewood Road.This section of pipeline is over capacity when analyzed considering the factor of safety and PCAP rating. T ,",Vi)I . vl\l C,",VI'tI YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $10,000 CONSTRUCTION $99,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $5,000 LEGAL TOTAL ,._-&---===-. "."r ......I ...,I~t:I Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: 49 3-54 PROJECT:SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT- WEST GENERAL STREET TYPE:Sewer System LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works This section of the City's sewer system has been determined to be under capacity.This project will replace 560 feet of 8 inch sewer pipe.The pipe will be replaced with a 12 inch vitrified clay DESCRIPTION:pipeline.The pipeline runs on West General Street between Bernice Drive and W~st Crestwood Street.This section of pipeline is over capacity when analyzed considering the factor of safety flow run. ......"·.."":T .................I.I~\•••••..»••>•.••.•7>>___•.•........ .......\bY~.~......L [··V..A ......... >....I ,..""..."'>,.."""...>YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $17,000 CONSTRUCTION $98,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $7,000 LEGAL TOTAL ........> ·i >...·.·.·...·i·.•···.·ii··.·.·.····.·····>t·... ._----ON >.••••..»>.>I .........V">.... •••••• Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATlON ••FOR·INCLUstON••ON ••S••YEAR·.CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITIED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X v I ncr(00('\u;;':1 .......,~.•.•.•.•••.•.••••........\><»...>>>•••••••.•.•.••••»............ 50 3-55 PROJECT:ABALONE COVE SEWER SYSTEM PROJECTS TYPE:Sewer System LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works Water Board requirements mandate the City prepare a Sewer System Management Plan for the Abalone Cove Sewer System - estimated cost is $80,000.Three Pump Stations in the Abalone Cove area need to be modified to allow the use of more reliable pumps estimated cost is $65,000 each.Approximately 300 feet of braided stainless steel low pressure line needs to be repaired/replaced at an approximate cost of $30,000.Forty DESCRIPTION:manholes throughout the system need cleaning and to be lined using a mastic treatment at a cost of approximately $80,000. Approximately fifty low pressure grinder pumps are used throughout the system to aid in overcoming grade differences. These grinder pumps are nearing (or are at)the end of their useful lives.Replacing each pump is estimated to cost $2,000 -the total grinder pump budget need is $100,000.The project will also require $60,000 in design and $22,000 for project management. pDt"'Illl:t"'1'COST"":o>1 ).>iii)»..... ••••••• ......... ~~.Rt.i ·VI:AD?.YEAR3.·····XEAR .....YEAR.x ..•........................\1 >i .,...",,~....>..............•.•.....•'>i ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $60,000 CONSTRUCTION $485,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $22,000 LEGAL TOTAL >>ii >.·Q;.t:;1;7nnn »\> ••••••••• iii .......»>••.•..•...•.••.••>......_...._....~.ii ··.···.········i i·······ii \i»>i»••••••••••..... Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLO$IONONSYEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:.... Project Costs are based on similar projects performed within the Abalone Cove System. Estimated Cost:$567,000 51 3-56 PROJECT:SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT- IRONWOOD STREET TYPE:Sewer System LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works This section of the City's sewer system has been determined to be under capacity.This project will replace 930 feet of 8 inch sewer pipe which does not have the hydraulic capacity to accommodate existing flows.The pipe will be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified DESCRIPTION:clay pipe.The pipeline runs partly along Ironwood Street and runs through the easement along Silver Spur Road.This reach of pipeline is given a high priority ranking due the assigned PACP rating of 5 and it is over capacity for existing,future and factor of safety flow conditions. DDI"'\''''''CO;S,-iii i<i ii ••••••••••• ..........•••••<.•.•••••.••-\1"1:1 YEAR YEAR ·YEAR-.YEARSvAlt:UVI"l:T. ••••••< ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $35,000 CONSTRUCTION $202,275 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $10,000 LEGAL TOTAL ....../...................<.......1<»...........> ••••••• ,-''~'" iivirl-\CT ON ••••••••••••••••......>........••..•••>.... Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUS',}.............<>'-".' SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X VI "I;I'~•.•.•.......><>«/ As funding becomes available,projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater Master Plan Update.This project is ranked number 1 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the plan. 52 3-57 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT ~ PVDS at SCHOONER Sewer System N/A Public Works This section of the City's sewer system has been determined to be under capacity.This project will replace 2,377 feet of 8 AND 10 inch sewer pipes which do not have the hydraulic capacity to accommodate existing flows.The pipes will be replaced with an 18 inch vitrified clay pipeline.The pipeline runs along Palos Verdes Drive South between Conqueror Drive and Schooner Drive.25%of this pipeline is over capacity for existing flow conditions and 50 %of the pipeline is over capacity for future flow conditions. ACQUISITION YEAR ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $65,000 $517,000 $21,000 LEGAL TOTAL ..-I I .I Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X v Inc",rtrtl"\ As funding becomes available,projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater Master Plan Update.This project is ranked number 2 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the plan. 53 3-58 PROJECT:SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECTD PVDS at SEA COVE TYPE:Sewer System LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works This section of the City's sewer system has been determined to be under capacity.This project will replace 748 feet of 8 inch sewer pipe which does not have the hydraulic capacity to accommodate DESCRIPTION:existing flows.The pipe will be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified clay pipeline.The pipeline runs along Palos Verdes Drive South between Sea Cove Drive and Abalone Cove Shoreline Park.This section of pipeline is over capacity for existing flow conditions. l:)~n·IECT""v':>l •••••••••••»»••>..•.•.•....... ••••••••••• ...... ••••;4tR.1 ......yEAR.•......•..YEAR.[YEAR.YEAR.5IJAlc\.:lIV"J .. ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $29,000 CONSTRUCTION $163,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $7,000 LEGAL .TOTAL ......••.•..•>»•••..••>.................">•••.>.....>>...... ·.VI'f .........•••...••••»>.....>•.••..••...., Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. Jba »>...•••••.•• ••••••••••• SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VI »•••.••••••.•••.•.•»>>».......... As funding becomes available,projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater Master Plan Update.This project is ranked number 3 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the plan. 54 3-59 PROJECT:SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT- GINGER ROOT LANE TYPE:Sewer System LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works This section of the City's sewer system has been determined to be under capacity.This project will replace 952 feet of 8 inch sewer pipe.The pipe will be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified clay pipeline.The pipeline runs along Ginger Root Lane between Narcissa Drive and Cinnamon Lane.This section of pipeline is over capacity when analyzed considering the factor of safety flow run. DESCRIPTION: ~~:~\ f"A ~--- II 'j . ACQUISITION ENGINEERINGIDESIGN $29,000 CONSTRUCTION $166,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $8,000 LEGAL TOTAL..._.--,..... IIVI ..."'v I VI"......._,""'. Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds . ..uu.,"',."""'" SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X vIner'( As funding becomes available,projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater Master Plan Update.This project is ranked number 7 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the plan. 55 3-60 PROJECT:SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECTM MALAGA CANYON TYPE:Sewer System LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works This section of the City's sewer system has been determined to be under capacity.This project will replace 1,850 feet of 10 inch sewer pipe.The pipe will be replaced with a 15 inch vitrified clay DESCRIPTION:pipeline.The pipeline runs behind properties in Malaga Canyon parallel to Basswood Avenue between Mossbank Drive and Mazur Drive.This section of pipeline is over capacity when analyzed considering the factor of safety flow run. p~n.·--"'-"""''''><\•..\"V01·1'!:J> ..........Cpy')Jv,YEAR YEAR ..YEARS'-/'\I C\.7VI'I ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $59,000 CONSTRUCTION $335,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $13,000 LEGAL TOTAL ...........................·.....·........·......·.·..·i...................i·.........I»>........................... ~I.vl .. •••••• »<.....>/<<>•••..••.•.>.••••.•.•••• Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP Reserve funds. JUstiFICATION FOFflNCLUSION ON5YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VincI"(••••••••••••• ....>.>•..•...<.... As funding becomes available,projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater Master Plan Update.This project is ranked number 5 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the plan. 56 3-61 PROJECT:SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT- MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS TYPE:Sewer System LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works Several smaller locations throughout the City require repairs. These sections of the City's sewer system have been determined to be under capacity.These projects will replace 1,951 feet of 8 DESCRIPTION:inch sewer pipe.The pipes will be replaced with 12 inch vitrified clay pipelines.The pipelines are located in several locations throughout the City. ·001"'\i<ii ..«</<..i<···•.·•• ......<········i<•••••••Yl"•••••••••••••••······.,i Iii ..•.•.•................................ •••••••••••YEAR 5----.'".....«<..•.••.,....<............. ACQUISITION ENGIN EERI NG/DESIGN $75,000 CONSTRUCTION $340,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT $50,000 LEGAL TOTAL •••••••••••••• ..........·tAAIU'Itin...... .••_.--ON ......................................./...".....1 ....... Funding and/or Grant Information:CIP ReseNe funds. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCl.USIONON 5YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X .....1.<•.••••/ •••••••••••••••••••••••• <.............................>.............. As funding becomes available,projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater Master Plan Update.This project is ranked number 8 of the 8 identified Capital Improvement Projects in the plan. 57 3-62 RECREATION,PARKS &OPEN SPACE The development and maintenance of community parks,recreational areas and open space has been established as a top priority for the City as stated in the General Plan and various other planning documents.The General Plan states, "It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve,protect and enhance its natural resources,beauty and open space for the benefit and enjoyment of its residents and the residents of the entire region.Future development shall recognize the sensitivity of the natural environment and be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the protection of it." Many park sites and open space areas have been acquired throughout the City, and some have been developed for use by the general public.Some sites remain vacant or underutilized.The City Council approved the Vision Plan in September 2008 which outlines various trail and park projects which have been included in this plan.The Public Use Master Plan has also outlined a strategy for the development of trails which has also been incorporated into the CIP list. These recreational projects add to the vibrancy of the community and they are designed to contribute to all residents'quality of life.Parks and other open spaces have been carefully planned to take advantage of the beautiful coastline and natural landscape of the peninsula. 58 3-63 PROJECT:ABALONE COVE SHORELINE PARK PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS TYPE:Recreation,Parks &Open Space LOCATION:Abalone Cove Shoreline Park DEPARTMENT:Public works With the expected completion of the Land and Water Conservation Fund grant funded improvement project at Abalone Cove Shoreline Park in 2014,public usage of this park is anticipated to increase significantly.The grant funded improvements do not include the existing parking lot.Thus,this will necessitate improving the existing parking lot to accommodate the anticipated public demand. The scope of this project's work includes paving (with crushed aggregate base/binder)of the 60,500 square-feet of the frontage lot; DESCRIPTION:installation of wheel stops and striping;creating spaces for bus drop off,turnaround and parking;asphalt concrete ADA parking spaces; removal and replacement of existing wood pylons with boulders; fencing,landscaping &irrigation around the power generator and propane tank;landscaping &Irrigation along Palos Verdes Drive South;removal of light bollards at Annie's Stand and opening up the area;vegetation removal;and installation of an automated entrance and exit system. _i<i .....<....................••••••••••• .........«., .........................·.ii ...·.i·.···.·..·..·..··ii iii '''H',_i .'"",..ft."YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN 30,000 CONSTRUCTION 302,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL .rOJAL .......<iiii i ......ii <<i/••••••• ......<.., i .·.....·..i ii .i < ••••••••• ••••••..,r_......."......... Funding and/or Grant Information:Quimby Funding. JUSTIFICATION FOR JNCI..USION IN FY13.14 BUOGE:T SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL X OUTSIDE FUNDING CITY SERVICES COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL COMMUNITY XPLANGOALSQUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: 59 3-64 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: --- ABALONE COVE SHORELINE PARK STAFF BUILDING,RESTROOMS AND DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENTS Buildings and Other Facility Improvements Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Public works With the expected completion (2014)of the grant funded improvement project at Abalone Cove Shoreline Park,usage of this park will increase significantly.The staff building and restrooms are in poor condition;however the grant fund excludes improvements to this building.The improvements will enhance the condition of this facility and also make it ADA compliant. ..............i/i..........<.ii .«.•••••< ""AI ACQUISITION '..::,;~YEAR 2 'r:::::'R :YEAR 4 YEAR 5 ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT 18,000 90,000 LEGAL TOTAL.._- IIVII""A\",I·VN _•••-1:11 nn~T Funding and/or Grant Information:Quimby Funding. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION IN FY 13-14 BUDGET SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X v",,,,, 60 3-65 PROJECT:HESSE PARK PARKING LOT RESURFACING TYPE:Recreation,Parks and Open Space LOCATION:Hesse Park DEPARTMENT:Public works Hesse Park parking lot is one of the frequently used City facilities. The AC pavement at this parking lot is deteriorating and needs DESCRIPTION:resurfacing.Delaying this improvement will add to the cost of work due to extension of cracks into the depth of the existing pavement caused by motorists'usage. i .••...«i )······i i .<riV I::Ai:l1<i ii ••••••••••••• A YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $10,000 CONSTRUCTION $180,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL ....<••••••<.............i ) )•••••••<)i Funding and/or Grant Information:Quimby Funding. JUSTIFICA110N·.FOR.IN.CI..US1ON.·IN ••FY.•1445••aUOGET SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITIED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: 61 3-66 POINT VICENTE INTERPRETIVE PROJECT:CENTER (PVIC)BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGN I SCREENING WALL TYPE:BUildings and Other Facility Improvements LOCATION:PVIC DEPARTMENT:Public works In order to provide a building identification sign that will also screen the existing above ground power generator,gas tank,electrical DESCRIPTION:panels/transformers,a 1DO-foot long concrete serpentine shaped wall is proposed to be installed in the lawn area adjacent to the pedestrian walkway.This decorative screening wall will include the foliowinQ buildinQ identification:Point Vicente Interpretive Center PROJEC.T.COST ESTJMATEs (IF KNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN $15,000 CONSTRUCTION $95,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAl-<«/I>......>•.•.••><<••••........./••••••... .......<i>«//<.><>i.. Funding and/or Grant Information:Quimby Funding. JUSTIFiCATION FORINCLUSION IN FY13·14SUOGET ••••• SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VI •••••••........>•••••./><.................................»/••••·i 62 3-67 PROJECT:RYAN PARK UPPER PARKING LOT EXPANSION TYPE:Recreation,Parks and Open Space LOCATION:Ryan Park DEPARTMENT:Public works The capacity of the existing upper parking lot at Ryan Park is limited to 38 vehicles.With events scheduled at this park on weekends,the parking lot becomes full and up to 25 vehicles of the overflow need to park on Hawthorne Blvd.Parking on this sharply curved and steep segment of the Hawthorne Blvd creates a potentially unsafe situation for park users who drop off their youth to use the athletic fields.Additionally,drivers who use the southern driveway entrance face a potentially unsafe condition due insufficient sight clearance.The southern driveway of Ryan Park is budgeted for realignment to improve ingress and egress. DESCRIPTION:However, with a row of vehicles parked along the western side of Hawthorne Boulevard,the existing unsafe condition not be completely addressed.Widening of the upper parking lot will create another 30 parking spaces with a space for bus drop-off and turn-around.Additionally,the upper driveway will be connected to the lower driveway.This will make it possible for vehicles in the parking lot to move to the lower entrance if the drivers intend to be on southbound Hawthorne Boulevard. Increasing the capacity of the parking lot combined with restricting parking on this segment of Hawthorne Boulevard will enhance safety and convenience for drivers,bicycle riders and park users pgnJECTCOiST In:::....•./>•••••/.••••••• >Tt:AK 1 >·"""''''4 YEARS ••••••• ,.,,.·..'''''1"\0 ....'''''1"\0. ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $400,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL •TOTAl./>/•••••••.•.•••>......>"""'A />•••••.•••».••••..>.......,.,,///»i>i »>.·.....ii····......~....IV., Funding and/or Grant Information:Quimby Funding. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCl-USIONON5YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X OTHER PROJECTINFORMATION: 63 3-68 PROJECT:SALVATION ARMY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT POROJECT TYPE:Recreation,Parks and Open Space LOCATION:Between Palos Verdes Drive West &the Southerly Boundary of Salvation Armv property. DEPARTMENT:Public Works The route of the Salvation Army Trail is based on the City's Conceptual Trails Plan and the Council adopted Vision Plan which is considered high priority for public benefit.This 2,200 feet Trail will connect Tramonto trail to Prickly Bear and other trails in Alta Vicente Reserve.The existing FY12-13 fund earmarked for trails DESCRIPTION:improvement in the Recreation,Parks,&Open Space program is $90,000.The cost estimated for construction and design work is $193,000.In order to complete this project,it is necessary to appropriate the balance of $1 03,000. •••••>••••••••••··f ....... ••••••,..>>••••••••••»»»»':::.;;;..••••••• •••••••••• YE.4.R.4 .·.YEAR5,-,...... ACQUISITION SURVEYING/ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $103,000 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL*........·.·i>......•.•..••'"'"'',,"".>>............. IIIJIPACTvN ......_.............;,......... Funding and/or Grant Information: Existing Budget $90,000 FY 13-14 Budget Request:$103,000 JUSTIFICATION.·FOR.INCLUSION••IN••FY •••1344.SUOaET SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VI Mct(PAI""'JECT ••••••• ..... •••••• 64 3-69 UNFUNDED PROJECTS The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs through various planning processes,but currently there are not resources to complete the projects.As funding becomes available and the City Council prioritizes and approves projects,they may be moved into the funded Five-Year CIP schedule. 65 3-70 $300,000 $475,000 Potential $635,000 $635,000 $660,000 $720,000 x x $150000 $150,000 Potential x x $2,400,000 $2,400,000 Potential $400,000 $450,000 x RPV Capital Improvement Plan·Unfunded Projects Potential Safety City Council Cost Range Fundin Goal Priori Minimum Maximum x x $4,900,000 $4,900,000 Limited CDBG funds $160,000 Ginsburg Donation for Center $3,000,000 $8,000000 "Performin Arts"buildi $300,000 $1,000,000 x $350,000 $350,000 Potential Arterial Rehabilitation·Silver Spur Road Hawthorne Blvd.to D bank Dr.x x $500,000 $500,000 Hawthorne Blvd.Median Improvements Via Rivera to Ci Hall $250000 $250000 Lower Point Vicente Park Access Modification Pro'ect PVDW at PVIC x x x $250,000 $300,000 Potential Operational Improvements at Crenshaw &Crest x x x $470,000 $520,000 Potential Crenshaw Blvd Extension Parking 1m rovements x $125000 $150,000 Hawthorne Bivd.Right of Way Beautification x x $2,200,000 $2,600,000 Hawthorne Blvd.Bike Lane Ga Closure x x $1,200,000 $1,500,000 Traffic Safety Improvements -PVDE at Miraleste Drive x 66 3-71 BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS UNFUNDED PROJECTS 67 3-72 PROJECT:CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION TYPE:BUildings and Other Facility Improvements LOCATION:Various DEPARTMENT:Public works The Citywide ADA Transition Plan identifies projects with total cost estimates of $11.8 million.This estimate includes $2.6 million of roadway curb ramps and bus stops to be addressed with future roadway projects;$1.7 million of access improvements at Ladera Linda to be addressed with any future rehabilitation of the Ladera Linda Community Center;and $1.3 million of access improvements at the Civic Center to be addressed with any future DESCRIPTION:rehabilitation of the City Hall campus. The remaining $6.2 million of identified projects are to improve ADA compliance at various other City-owned properties.The funded section of this document includes $1.3 million of projects scheduled for the next five years from this list,and address issues categorized as "potential hazard"and "severe".The remaining $4.9 million of this list,as well as the amounts noted above for roadways,Ladera Linda,and the Civic Center remain unfunded. PROJECT COST E$TIMATES(lFKNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL i········································••••••••i <.••.••..... ............F ··i«<....•·.···i ..........«.......•.•.••.•.•<•••••• Possible future CDBG funding available. JUSTIFICATION FORINCLUSION ON 5 YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECT INFORMAtiON: Estimated Cost:$4.9 million , 68 3-73 PROJECT:POINT VICENTE PARK COMMUNITY CENTER TYPE:Buildings and Other Facility Improvements LOCATION:Upper Point Vicente/Civic Center DEPARTMENT:City Manager/Public Works Originally studied by the Open Space Planning,Recreation and Parks Task Force in 2004,the concept for this facility was later refined during the redevelopment of the Coast Vision Plan. DESCRIPTION:Adopted by the City Council in 2008, the latest concept calls for a 20,000 square-foot community center that could accommodate meeting space for community groups,recreational facilities, classroom space and full-sized recreational pool. 1<.//////i<.'.n~. \11-\11;'"<i </YI;AR1 .......................,..yeAR5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL <•.•..<<...••<•••••• ••••• ••••• ••••••....._......-........i ...............•(...(i i '.v n ....i'.· Impact will need to be assessed. JUSTIFICATION•••FOR·.INCLUSION ••ON.S.YEAR·.CIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHERcgn ""n 1,\,/....,•••••••••••• <.••••••.........i .•.•< Estimated Cost:$3,000,000 -$8,000,000 69 3-74 PROJECT:STORAGE YARD RELOCATION TYPE:Buildings and Other Facility Improvements LOCATION:Various Locations throughout the City DEPARTMENT:City Manager/Public Works It has been proposed that City maintenance services be spread citywide in strategic locations with a central office in City Hall.The existing storage yard is located on the Upper Point Vicente Park site which had been identified for various other community uses due to its prime location. DESCRIPTION:Staff is proposing the creation of a central location for the storage yard with satellite locations throughout the City,serving the storage and other construction needs of the Public Works Department.The central location of the storage yard will be situated at or near City Hall for administrative purposes.This central location will control all satellite locations through the use of maintenance personnel and through the efficient use of the City's network. III ..................................""",,.,.1:..•••i ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL ·.i<·.·.·.i ••••••• .......i ..<••...•ii···...<•••••.•.•..•....... ••UN\....<..............iiiii······•••••••••<••.... J'''''......<•...•.•i··.·.·...............<•••••••••• SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY VI ncl"\rlllon •••••••.....i«<..........·....<i .·...··..i<<.••.•. The satellite locations will fulfill the following roles:there will be an office trailer at each location;a construction yard for contractors located throughout the City (possibly generating rental income for the City); possible satellite EOC centers for access throughout the City;and storage space for various equipment. Estimated Cost:$300,000 -$1,000,000 70 3-75 PROJECT:SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR HESSE PARK BUILDING TYPE:Buildings and Other Facility Improvements LOCATION:Various DEPARTMENT:Public works Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating systems over the roof of Hesse Park to reduce power consumption with occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid.This project DESCRIPTION:will help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce considerable amounts of emissions.Typically the energy savings can cover the cost of projects of this scale in an estimated period of 15 to 20 years. i//«/••••••••..... '<</<>•.•••••I ..."•.,...........-,..-l'{EAFt3 ..•..••······YEAR4 YEAR5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL •••••••ii<.i iii ••••••••••••• > ••••••• 1/..... •••_---OM ...............»..............IIVI'-"'''''1_."_.....,.,...1 JUSTIFICATION···FOR·.INCLUSION·.·.ON···.S···.YEARCIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X VI i.·.···.·.«iii .......................................<// Estimated Cost:$350,000 71 3-76 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR POINT VICENTE INTERPRETIVE CENTER (PVIC) Buildings and Other Facility Improvements Various Public works Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating systems over the roof of PVIC to reduce power consumption with occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid.This project will help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce considerable amounts of emissions.Typically the energy savings can cover the cost of projects of this scale in an estimated period of 15 to 20 years. PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL I .",.....1 VI"...._ YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEARS Estimated cost is $200,000 -$400,000 for each facility ($600,000 -$1,200,000 total) Funding:Will seek Federal/State Energy Savings Grants JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECTINFORMAl'ION:ii>•..•..•..•• Estimated Cost:$410,000 72 3-77 INTANGIBLE CAPITAL OUTLAY UNFUNDED PROJECTS NO PROJECTS CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED 73 3-78 ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE UNFUNDED PROJECTS 74 3-79 ARTERIAL REHABILITATION-SILVER PROJECT:SPUR ROAD (HAWTHORNE BLVD.TO DRYBANK DRIVE) TYPE:Roadway Infrastructure LOCATION:Silver Spur Road (Hawthorne Blvd.to Drybank Drive) DEPARTMENT:Public Works After the street right of way was transferred back to the City,Silver Spur Road will be resurfaced to mitigate roadway distress and DESCRIPTION:degradation that has occurred over the years.This project will require milling and overlay,root removal,asphalt patching,curb and gutter repair,sidewalk repair,ADA ramps and re-striping. D~n........<i ••••••• I .....W ...•.......... "'A <i <iii <i,.....,.~I ........''''''~''YEAR 4 ll;;AI'\O ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL •TO'tAL.<<t t·····ttt i ••••• i <•••••• UN ......<.•••.••.·.···.t<••••••••...<•••••< There is no impact on the operating budget. JUSTIFICATION··FOR··1NCLUSION••ON·.S··YEAR ••CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VIneR .•..........<<\\•.••••••<<......> Estimated Cost:$500,000 75 3-80 HAWTHORNE BLVD.MEDIAN PROJECT:IMPROVEMENTS (VIA RIVERA TO CITY HALL) TYPE:Roadway Infrastructure LOCATION:Hawthorne Blvd.(Via Rivera to City Hall) DEPARTMENT:Public Works The development of this median would include installing sustainable landscaping which will require minimal maintenance. DESCRIPTION:Development will also include the installation of irrigation systems and controllers,hardscape,and decorative stone.This would be the second segment of median improvements. DDn·..........til:.\,,\,1')J <•••.••.<'.,.","''''11'r:.Att~••••••••••••.••.l(EA~4 YEARS<••••••••• ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL tOTAL.<••••••• <•••••••••••••• ><.••••••<<«....... ...·.~VI1ll <><>.•.<.•••.......<....>••••• JUStIFICAtION ••FOR.INCLUSION.·ON.S.·YEAR••CIP ....<... SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X <<>«i<.•••>.••••••••........ ·Uln..-ry Estimated Cost:$250,000 76 3-81 PROJECT:LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK ACCESS MODIFICATION PROJECT TYPE:Traffic Improvements LOCATION:PVDW/PVDS at Lower Point Vicente Park entrance DEPARTMENT:Public Works Improve access into and out of the Lower Point Vicente park area by DESCRIPTION:restricting turn movements to right turn only out of the site at the southern entrance/exit to minimize vehicle conflicts while negotiating turn movements. .i······«.•.....«....... •••••••••••••«« ••••••••••••••• ······Y'EARl YEAR 2 <<<VIi!AR.4 YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL •••••..... IIIJIPACT ON,..........".,..~,...I •••••.......<< JUSTIFICATIONFORINCI..USIONON&YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY VincI'(........ <<<••.<•••••••••••••«.<•.•••« Estimated Cost:$250,000 •$300,000 77 3-82 OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS· PROJECT:CRENSHAW BLVD.AND CREST DRIVE TYPE:Roadway Infrastructure LOCATION:Crenshaw Blvd.and Crest Drive DEPARTMENT:Public Works Currently this intersection is a four-way stop controlled intersection.During the AM and PM peak hours,the westbound DESCRIPTION:left-turn lanes back up for several hundreds of feet creating extensive delay and long vehicle queues.An operational improvement to the intersection is required to improve traffic flow. A study is being conducted to determine the best solution. PROJECTCO$T ••ESTIMATES(IFKNOWNl CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 ..YEAR 4 YEAR 5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL ••••••)..........< 11Y1 ....1-\~IVI'l ........'•...ING JUSTIFICATION FORINCI..USIONON5YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VincI'.....................»>....... ••• •••.•<........ Estimated Cost:$470,000 -$520,000 78 3-83 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT CRENSHAW BOULEVARD EXTENSION PARKING IMPROVEMENTS Roadway Infrastructure Crenshaw Blvd (Valley View Rd to Burma Rd) Public Works In an effort to improve safety,parking and access to the Nature Preserve entrance near Del Cerro Park,parking improvements and restrictions are needed to accommodate the growing user demand and need for emergency vehicle access. YEAR 5 There is no impact on the operating budget. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES SUPPORTS COUNCIL GOALS Estimated Cost:$125,000 -$150,000 79 X 3-84 PROJECT:HAWTHORNE BLVD RIGHT OF WAY BEAUTIFICATION TYPE:Roadway Infrastructure LOCATION:Hawthorne Blvd (City Hall to Northerly City Limits) DEPARTMENT:Public Works DESCRIPTION: The City's Right of Way along Hawthorne Blvd will be beautified by landscaping and masking blight conditions created by failed fences, walls and other private improvements.The medians in this area will be improved by landscape and/or hardscape enhancements. ACQUISITION YEAR 5 ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT There is no impact on the operating budget. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X XCOMMUNITYQUALITY/SUSTAINABILITYSUPPORTSCOUNCILGOALSX Estimated Cost:$2,200,00 -$2,600,000 80 3-85 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT HAWTHORNE BLVD BIKE LANE GAP CLOSURE Roadway Infrastructure Hawthorne Blvd (Vall on Drive to Dupre Road) Public Works This project will improve roadway safety and complete a bike lane gap closure that exists due to on-street parking demand,roadway configuration and existing median barriers. YEAR 5 There is no impact on the operating budget. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X SUPPORTS COUNCIL GOALS 81 x X 3-86 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT MIRALESTE DRIVE Traffic Improvements PVDE at Miraleste Drive Public Works Improve intersection operations to create improved traffic flow, vehicle and pedestrian safety.Operational improvements could include traffic signal controls or a roundabout as warranted . PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL YEAR 2 YEAR 3 ... YEAR 4 YEAR 5 t~TO~T~A~L~~"'~~U~:~-I:r=~====~=====::=======~=====~===j~. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X Have applied and will continue to apply for external funding for traffic safety. Estimated Cost:$200,000 -$300,000 82 3-87 UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING UNFUNDED PROJECTS 83 3-88 PROJECT:UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT 25 TH STREET TYPE:Public Utilities LOCATION:25 111 Street DEPARTMENT:Public Works This project includes the removal of overhead wires and DESCRIPTION:coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location.The City will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,communications,etc.)to locate all wires underground. -_..........<)<•••••••••••. . .......<>...............••.•',...,.....>< ••••••• .V"'A~."YEAR 4 YEAR 5.........."v ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL .TOrAL .............)i»)...... ••••••••••••• ..»<................................... >••.••)i><<.·.·.·.·.i ..>..•••••••••<>..........,.....I This project could be funded through Southern California Edison's Rule 20A Funding. JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSiON .ONS YEARCIP .......... SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VI MCI"('.••.••••••.••.•.....<.<..<......<.•••.•>»<»<i ••••••.. Estimated Cost:$t,OOO,OOO -$1,100,000 84 3-89 PROJECT:UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT ENTRANCE TO PVIC TYPE:Public Utilities LOCATION:Palos Verdes Drive South (at PVIC) DEPARTMENT:Public Works This project includes the removal of overhead wires and DESCRIPTION:coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location.The City will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,communications,etc.)to locate all wires underground. PROJECT·.COST••ESTtMATE.S ••(IF •••KNOWN) CATEGORY Y!±I\R,1<YEAR 2 YEAR3 YEAR4 YEAR5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL /«<1</i <......<<............. •••••• ••••••< This project could be funded through Southern California Edison's Rule 20A Funding. JUSTIFICAl"lONFORINCI.USION ON5YEARCIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VI /i<......<« Estimated Cost:$150,000 •$200,000 85 3-90 PROJECT:UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT PVDS AND TERRANEA WAY TYPE:Public Utilities LOCATION:PVDS and Terranea Way DEPARTMENT:Public Works This project includes the removal of overhead wires and DESCRIPTION:coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location.The City will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,communications,etc.)to locate all wires underground. ••••••><»/>•••••••••••••••....•<••••• hA ../»<••»••••••VCAD ...<?> ••••••••• .......yeARlS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL .TOTAL ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .••.•..•.•>> ••••••••••••••••.... ......< •••••••••••••••IIVIr-A'"_-......,..- This project could be funded through Southern California Edison's Rule 20A Funding. JUSTIFICATION••FOR ••'NCLU$ION.ON••S.YEAR ••OIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X """.'"''«.••.••. ••••••• <>«<>....•.•••••••••••> Estimated Cost:$150,000·$200,000 86 3-91 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM UNFUNDED PROJECTS 87 3-92 PROJECT:ALTAMIRA CANYON TYPE:Storm Drain System LOCATION:Project Area 4 DEPARTMENT:Public Works This project includes the installation of protective measures to DESCRIPTION:minimize further erosion in the Altamira Canyon.This project could range from stabilization at bends in stream beds,with limited velocity controls,to channeled stabilization. PROJECT·CoST••eSTIMATeS ••(IF ••KNO\iVN) CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL •••••........~..............I··.···.··....... //<••.•••.•/>/<>«....,...... JUSTIFICATION··FOR ••INCLUSION.ON.·S.VeAR.CIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X VlMI:K ~•••••/»><>/>///>/.........//< This estimate does not include right of way costs.A previously designed and funded project was abandoned due to right of way issues and owners lack of support. Estimated Cost:$1,250,000 -$5,000,000 88 3-93 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: 001'10 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION INTERIM ALTAMIRA CANYON PROJECT Storm Drain System N/A Public Works A project within lower Altamira Canyon to aid in slowing the damage being caused by storm water runoff through the entire reach of the Canyon is needed.The installation of Gabion type erosion control structures within lower Altamira Canyon are needed to help control runoff velocities and minimize erosion within the canyon. PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL Ju~:n II IV,.••_..•_YEA~r.ID SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER 001'10 I Note:An Altamira Canyon project is included in the 2012 CIP as an unfunded project ranging between $1.25 Million and $5 Million.The Altamira Canyon project has been studied and analyzed over the past decades;however the need to minimize runoff from entering the ground in Altamira Canyon still remains. This interim project will provide a temporary solution within the lower reaches of the canyon until the full project can be programmed. Estimated Cost:$356,000 89 3-94 PROJECT:PAINTBRUSH CANYON DRAINAGE TYPE:Storm Drain System LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works The Paintbrush Canyon Drainage System project will capture runoff at the head of the Portuguese Bend landslide in three DESCRIPTION:locations,transfer that runoff via surface mounted High Density Polyethylene (HDPE)pipe under Palos Verdes Drive South, (through an existing steel tunnel)and continue along the existing storm drain pipe alignment to the ocean . cIOn ICt"'T t"'n·~T I''''.•••.....•..ii .<i ........<>.... •••••<R-1 Rf YI;A~~<i ~Y~AR:YEARd.......iii< ••••••i •••••••...............<5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL •rOTAL «~iii ••••••••••••••••••••i·················1>····<•••••••••••••••••••.•..••>.......>..~...>....... ••••••• JUSTIFICATION FOR INCl.USIONON 5YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X v ...."'....•••.•><i<............«>i>............«.......» Preventing runoff water from entering the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in landslide areas.This project is expected to help slow movement within the Portuguese Bend landslide, eventually affecting the land movement at Palos Verdes Drive South. Estimated Cost:$2,568,000 90 3-95 PROJECT:PVDE-MIRALESTE CANYON TYPE:Storm Drain System LOCATION:Project Area 5 DEPARTMENT:Public Works Work within this project area includes storm drainage systems along Palos Verdes Drive East at the Northern end of PVDE,South DESCRIPTION:Coach,Rocking Horse,Clevis,North Colt,South Colt,Via Canada, and at South Via Canada.This project includes the installation of a number of pipelines and re-setting surface drainage systems to drain into Miraleste Canyon. .DDI"\·_........i >,..•...•••>>\••••••• ••••• <.YI:A~~<\YEAR4 YEARli............,,'"","""-...... ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL •TOTAL ••••••••••>••.•••••••....••...•.•.•>•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••<.<>•.••.....>•••••••••••• ................. IIVll"'Av ION __,~I <..... JUSTIFICATION FORJNCI..USION ON5YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X ••••• ............<>............'1'............. Estimated Cost:$2,500,000 -$3,200,000 91 3-96 PROJECT:SAN PEDRO &AVERILL CANYONS TYPE:Storm Drain Systems LOCATION:Project Area 6 DEPARTMENT:Public Works Work within this project area would include storm drainage systems at Miraleste,South Miraleste,North Corsine,Via Colinita, La Vista,Vista Mesa,and a curb and gutter project on Via DESCRIPTION:Frascati.This project would include the installation of a number of pipelines and regarding of roads and surface drainage systems to drain into the San Pedro and Averill Canyons.A project at Miraleste Plaza is currently under design. ..•••.•>..>•...•.•>•.•...•.••..•••.><><••.••>.•• •••••••• ./............i «..,......'",>........I YEARSI................I ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL <<i <<<•••••••••••••••<•••••••..••>I IIVll"'AvlON <..•..•.••........<................. ••• JUSTIFICATION FORINCLUSION ON 5YEARCIP SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X vlncn ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••........ •••••• «••.•.•••••..•.•••..••••..• Estimated Cost:$2,700,000·$3,300,000 92 3-97 LANDSLIDE MITIGATION PROJECTS UNFUNDED 93 3-98 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: INSTALLATION OF NEW DEWATERING WELLS Landslide Project N/A Public Works Dewatering Wells are a high priority and are considered to be the next most effective method of minimizing runoff from entering the landslide,which helps slow land movement within the landslide. All runoff that percolates into the ground eventually becomes part of the groundwater and will cause an increase in the depth of the groundwater table.Removing groundwater through dewatering wells helps to lower the groundwater table,relieving soil pressures at depth and minimizing the negative effects groundwater has on the landslide.Three new upslope wells in Portuguese Bend and two new wells in Abalone Cove are initially planned during this phase of the system's expansion.These new wells should improve the system's effectiveness by increasing the system's water removal capacity and by removing water more rapidly.Two new dewatering well projects should be scheduled annually until the five have been installed.The cost to install each well is estimated to be $85,000 . C1'\1 C~V~l ACQUISITION •-.::::--I .veAD "lI VI=.ll.R A 'Tt •-~..-•"1"\"".-~..~ ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION; ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X Removing groundwater at depth from the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in landslide areas.This project will expand the existing system and is expected to help slow movement within the Portuguese Bend landslide,eventually affecting the land movement along Palos Verdes Drive South. Estimated Cost:$255,000 94 3-99 PROJECT:REHABILITATION OF DEWATERING WELLS TYPE:Landslide Project LOCATION:N/A DEPARTMENT:Public Works Dewatering Wells are a high priority and are considered to be the next most effective method of minimizing runoff from entering the landslide,which helps slow land movement within the landslide. Up to sixteen existing wells in Abalone Cove and three wells in Portuguese Bend require routine maintenance and will likely need DESCRIPTION:to be rehabilitated over the next fifteen years,as will the five new wells that are planned.Rehabilitation of dewatering wells will ensure the system's continued effectiveness by maintaining the system's water removal capacity.Well rehabilitation projects should be scheduled one or two per year as needed following the installation of the five new dewatering wells.The cost to rehabilitate one well is $70,000. •PDf'\JECTvv~:nJ;;o »......//»»••.•••.} .,....... ••••••••••••>•••••••••••••••,DA ••••..••ItF")>,R2>.•••..•.•......•••••.••••••• yEAR ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL ••••••••••••••••• ..... IMPACT ON OPEFM-tINGBUOGET ..... •••• J U:.;.I 'T I\.,,..,V''1 TV".......... ••••••••• ....... ........................ •••••••••••• SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER·.PROJECT·.INFORMATION:.................»>>•••••••.•..••••••••.•.•••»•.•••••.... Removing groundwater at depth from the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in landslide areas.This project will help maintain the existing system which has shown to help slow movement within the Abalone Cove landslide.It is expected that the rehabilitation of wells will eventually affect the land movement along Palos Verdes Drive South. Estimated Cost:$1,634,000 -$1,704,000 95 3-100 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: INSTRUMENT WELLS Landslide Project N/A Public Works Instrument Wells are needed to monitor groundwater levels and landslide movement.These wells will provide information that can be valuable to engineers and scientists when a project to minimize land movement is designed or when analyzing movement to help determine where potential projects will be most useful.Collecting the data would require a person to visit the equipment once monthly to download the information,transport the information to a host computer where it would be saved and analyzed.The cost to install a piezometer and/or inclinometer in a well at depth is currently estimated to be $100,000,costs associated with the ongoing data collection and analysis could be an additional $25,000 per year. .......... - ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL . ...•~ON ~ ,..,....,.., SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS OTHER pgnl X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY x The cost of ongoing data collection and analysis required to facilitate this capital expenditure would need to be programmed annually when the Automatic GPS Monitoring Station is funded. Estimated Cost:$121,000 96 3-101 RECREATION,PARKS AND OPEN SPACE UNFUNDED PROJECTS 97 3-102 PROJECT:RESTROOM AT DEL CERRO PARK TYPE:Recreation,Parks,&Open Space LOCATION:Del Cerro Park DEPARTMENT:Recreation and Parks/Community Development This project would include the construction of a restroom at Del DESCRIPTION:Cerro park to serve the park visitors and the users of the trails in the Portuguese Bend Open Space. •:--......·......-CQST i<••••••••••.............<»i«.............<••,.......vr •••• •••••• <.••..••...••iYSARf <••...•r ...~"4·······1'r::1'\rt'f .....YE:AR5 ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TQTAL ......ii ii<1<<iii iii)ii •.••.••••.•...•.i) ,iii ..............i i .......i .......ii ...... ..... JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON5YEARCIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X UIMt:1'(..................i ..iii Estimated Cost:$250,000 -$300,000 98 3-103 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: GATEWAY PARK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Recreation,Parks,&Open Space PVDS in the Portuguese Landslide Area Public Works/Community Development The Vision Plan includes a proposed Gateway Park,a 23-acre site within the City's Landslide Moratorium area just north of PVDS between the Portuguese Bend residential community and Klondike Canyon.Under the Vision Plan,the site has been approved for a combination of uses such as a "gateway park"for users of the Nature Preserve's trail system,an outdoor education/nature appreciation center for school and community groups and an equestrian center.The following components of the approved concept plan are being developed as part of the California Coastal Trail Project and PVDS Landslide East End Road Realignment Project:Trail head,signage,fencing,and public parking area. ACQUISITION ENGINEERINGIDESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT SAFETY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS Estimated Cost:$450,000 -$475,000 x 99 3-104 PROJECT:GRANDVIEW PARK IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE 1) TYPE:Recreation,Parks &Open Space LOCATION:Grandview Park DEPARTMENT:Public works The scope of work of the proposed 'phase one'of Grandview park includes construction of a natural parking lot,restrooms/office, DESCRIPTION:play area,picnic area and some landscaping.These basic items are chosen from the concept plan option "Sycamore"which was selected by the City Council....,.,... «<!f ~i i «•..•••••..•...•.••••••< ••<......'..~.~...,..~"~YEARS....I\l ...........~, ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAt...•••••••<..•.•. ••••••• .....i •••• ..... •••••••••••••••••••• <i<<.••••••••..• •••••••• JUSTIFICATION•••FOR·.INCl.USION••ON ••S.VEAR••CIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALlTY/SUSTAINABILlTY X Vl,..."<. •••••••«<«««<••.•••.•.•••.•......... Estimated Cost:$635,000 100 3-105 PROJECT:LOWER HESSE PARK IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE 1) TYPE:Recreation,Parks &Open Space LOCATION:Lower Hesse Park DEPARTMENT:Public works The scope of work of the proposed 'phase one'of Lower Hesse Park includes construction of a natural parking lot,restrooms, DESCRIPTION:basketball court,play area,picnic area and some landscaping. These basic items are chosen from the concept plan option "Pacific"which was selected by the City Council. '.......i >i ».•.••i ........·.·.·.i ······i ............ •••••••>'''''''''''•••••rE;!'\".~•1't:.~K3 ·YEARA YEAR5...'"'............,. ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL i <······ii <<••••••...........«··...·ii iii i> JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X Vf iii •••••••i •••••••••••••i ......<<.....•..... Estimated Cost:$660,000-$720,000 101 3-106 PROJECT:PRESERVE TRAILS PLAN -NEW TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION TYPE:Recreation,Parks,&Open Space LOCATION:Palos Verdes Nature Preserve DEPARTMENT:Community Development/Public Works In October 2012,the City Council adopted an updated Preserve Trails Plan (PTP)for the NCCP's Palos Verdes Nature Preserve which identifies trail routes and trail uses within the Preserve. Pursuant to the approved management agreement between the City and PVPLC,the PVPLC is responsible for maintenance and repair of existing unimproved trails in the Preserve while the City is responsible for the construction of new trails identified in the PTP. DESCRIPTION:According to the PTP,there are 3 approved trail routes that currently do not exist and need to be constructed at some point by the City.Since projects are moving forward on two of the three new trails needed (the Smugglers Trail in the Abalone Cove Reserve and the Switchback Trail in the San Ramon Reserve, construction of the Crystal Trail (.12 mile)in the Forrestal Reserve remains as the only new trail that needs construction.In addition, the Rim Trail will need to be relocated since the current route passes over private property in Rolling Hills. DgnU:::.~T «<»<)..»<..<..... <»<)I .......•~....I"\"••~.><IC;t\I'Vt ....YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL ··TOTAL <)1<)<•••••••••••..•••••••I><••.•••«1«>I ·•••_a --ON .)«><><<>"..,-.'••••• JUSTIFICATION··FOA,·.INCLUSJON.ON.·S·YEAR·CIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:...... •••••••••••••••••••>••••••• Estimated Cost:$150,000 102 3-107 PROJECT:LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TYPE:Recreation Parks &Trails Improvements LOCATION:Lower Point Vicente DEPARTMENT:Public Works The park improvement plan for Lower Point Vicente derives from an extensive public outreach process associated with the City Council adopted Vision Plan.The scope of work consists of constructing DESCRIPTION:new decomposed granite trails,overlooks,reconfigured and new parking spaces (including new upper terrace parking lot),drainage facilities (including a bioswale),landscaping,fencing,way finding signs and minor site grading to accommodate the improvements (excavation cannot occur in areas capped for the lead remediation.) PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN).... CATEGORY YEAR1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEARS ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAl...... ••••••....... ••••••<>•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1<••••••••11··.............01\1 <....../ JUSTIFICATION FOR INCI.USION ON 5VEARCIP SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X SUPPORTS TACTICAL PLAN GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X v .••"",....<>....<......................................<..••. Estimated Cost:$2,400,000 103 3-108 PROJECT:SUNNYSIDE TRAIL SEGMENT PROJECT TYPE:Recreation,Parks,&Open Space LOCATION:Sunnyside Ridge Road (Intersection of Sunnyside Ridge Trail and the Sol Vista Seament Train DEPARTMENT:Community Development/Public Works The Sunnyside Segment Trail is a point-to-point trail segment that begins on Sunnyside Ridge Road at the intersection of the Sunnyside Ridge Trail and the currently unused Sol Vista Segment Trail on the old Narbonne Right-of-Way,as indicated in the City's DESCRIPTION:Conceptual Trail Plan.The proposal is to provide a usable trail linkage for pedestrians and equestrians within a recorded trail segment that traverses a privately owned lot that is currently developed with a single-family residence that was formally part of an old City right-of-way.The trail connection would involve the provision of a 5-foot wide decomposed granite surface trail. .,..,.......-/......••••••••••• .......///>•••..•>.............. > ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL •./<..... ••••• •••.••••......>/..... •••• .••~••.••.•••...•.>..,_l ntJ »»///T •••..•..•.••</>//> u >.•.•.•.•...•...<..•.•••........>> SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:>••••• •7--->•..•...•••.•.•••...• Estimated Cost:$400,000 -$450,000 104 3-109 PROJECT: TYPE: LOCATION: DEPARTMENT: DESCRIPTION: COAST VISION PLAN TRAILHEAD/OVERLOOK/VISTA POINT DEVELOPMENT Recreation,Parks,&Open Space Various Locations Public Works/Community Development The Vision Plan identifies the construction of trailheads at key entrances to the existing City trail system along with overlooks and vista points within the Vision Plan project area.The trailheads would consist of a permeable surface pad,a bench,a plastic bag kiosk for dog owners,trash and recycling receptacles,signage,a freestanding kiosk for trail notices,small native trees for shade and pockets of native shrubs,where appropriate.The overlooks/vista points would be placed on decomposed granite or other permeable material with flush stone edging and could include a semicircle bench,a stone pilaster displaying pertinent information,a stone clad wall less than 3 feet in height and pockets of native shrubs. Phase 1 would involve a trail head at Shoreline Park/25th and overlooks/vista points at Inspiration Point and Eagles Nest.Phase 2 would involve trail heads and overlooks/vistas at the cul-de-sac next to St.Paul's Church,Del Cerro Park,and the end of Ocean Terrace. Phase 3 would involve a trail head at the Switchbacks/PVDE Turnout and overlooks/vista points at the Switchbacks/PVDE Turnout,Paintbrush Canyon/Burma Road,and Burma Road above Gateway Park. I ACQUISITION ENGINEERING/DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT LEGAL TOTAL 1M"'''''''I u........_.~,....... I I T C1'\n.~YEAR 5 JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP SAFETY SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION: Estimated Cost:$100,000·$130,000 ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY x 105 3-110