The URL can be used to link to this page

CC SR 20151006 01 - Parks Master Plan UpdateCITYOF MEMORANDUM 4iRANCHO PALOS VERDES TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CORY LINDER, DIRECTOR, RECREATION AND PARKS WZT— DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2015 SUBJECT: PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDATE REVIEWED: DOUG WILLMORE, CITY MANAGER"'�i Project Manager: Matt Waters, Senior Administrative Analyst, RVecreation and Parks i�4d" RECOMMENDATION 1) Adopt the Parks Master Plan Update 2) Incorporate the Design Guidance, Key Sites and portions of the Connections Sections of the Coast Vision Plan into the Parks Master Plan with the understanding that the Coast Vision Plan will be retired after the remaining Connections Section is incorporated into the Updated Trails Network Plan. FISCAL IMPACT Adopting the Parks Master Plan Update has no immediate fiscal impact. The long-term fiscal impact is difficult to determine due to a number of factors. The scope of many of the projects, particularly significant ones such as Ladera Linda and Point Vicente Park/Civic Center will likely change as their respective master plan processes are developed and the size, scale and quantities of amenities are determined. Many of the projects are already part of the existing Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) or are already part of the FY 15-16 budget. A number of projects are scheduled to be phased in over 3-5 years. More precise cost estimates will be developed as those projects move forward in the future. The current estimated costs for the projects (which does not include maintenance and operation expenses) ranges from approximately $17,600,000 to $23,700,000. Individual projects will be presented to City Council for their review and approval during each budget process. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the 2015 Parks Master Plan Update (PMPU) is to update the 1989 Parks Master Plan and to set forth a strategy for addressing the future planning of the City's parks, recreation, and open space resources. The PMPU will function as a living document to help guide and 1 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 2 respond to changes in the City's future park, open space and recreational needs. The PMPU presents updated information on each of the City's Park sites and identifies specific and general recommendations, but at its core it is a strategic document, not a series of construction blueprints. Significant park projects will still need to go through separate design and planning processes, public outreach efforts and City Council review and approval. BACKGROUND The City's existing Parks Master Plan was adopted on October 17, 1989 and has not been updated since that time. The 1989 Plan included a citizen survey, public workshops, meetings with special interest groups, written correspondence, and contact with homeowners associations and individual residents. The resulting Plan contains an extensive list of policies, goals and recommendations regarding the park and recreational needs of the community, as well as factual information and recommended improvements for each park site in the City. (Appendix A: 1989 Parks Master Plan Update) There have been many parks and open space changes and additions since the adoption of the 1989 Master Plan Update such as the City acquisition of new park sites and significant open space areas, including the now 1,450 acre Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. There have been attempts since 1989 to update the Parks Master Plan. The most comprehensive attempt occurred in 2002 when the City Council expanded the seven -member Recreation and Parks Committee into an eighteen -member Open Space Planning, and Recreation & Parks Task Force (Task Force). The Task Force, whose membership included a broad spectrum of interests concerning the recreation, parks and open space issues affecting the community, was charged with investigating all of the City's existing resources and unmet needs, and advising the City Council on updating the 1989 Parks Master Plan, including making recommendations for utilization of City parks and open space properties. The Task Force, which organized itself into eight subcommittees, presented a strategic plan to the City Council in 2004. The plan, which included dozens of recommendations for park sites and an extensive set of recreation options for the Upper Point Vicente/Civic Center property in particular, was not adopted by City Council and the Task Force was officially dissolved in 2005. (Appendix B Open Space Planning and Recreation & Parks Task Force Report). More recently, the Coast Vision Plan (CVP) was adopted by the City Council on September 2, 2008. The CVP represented over two years of planning and an extensive public outreach effort to create an informational planning document for the City's coastal areas. The CVP includes the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve and five additional sites: Upper Point Vicente, Lower Point Vicente, Abalone Cove, Gateway, and Del Cerro. The CVP also addressed improvements and recommendations related to public access, interpretive materials, and recreational amenities and facilities to improve the experience of the coast and open space areas for residents and visitors. While many of the CVP recommendations have not been significantly affected by developments since its adoption, several sites have been impacted by subsequent actions including the Annenberg Foundation's withdrawal of its proposed development project in 2011 and the Council's approval of including a skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center and the elimination of the Gateway Park parking lot proposal on June 30, 2015. (Appendix C: Coast Vision Plan w/ 2 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 3 Amendments) The CVP was updated in 2012 to remove the Annenberg Proposal at Lower Point Vicente and again in 2015 to update the conceptual plan for Lower Point Vicente. The June 30, 2015 Staff Report stated that once the PMPU is adopted, the impacted elements of the CVP will also need to be updated. Staff is now recommending that the Coastal Vision Plan be replaced by the PMPU. This approach eliminates the possibility of overlapping and conflicting strategic documents. The five key park sties addressed in the Coast Vision Plan (Gateway, Del Cerro, Point Vicente Park/Civic Center, Abalone Cove, and Lower Point Vicente) are all included and updated in the PMPU. Section 5, "Design Guidance" will be incorporated into the draft PMPU. The Connections section of the CVP will be considered in the ongoing Trails Network Plan Update and is also included in the PMPU to help provide guidance fortrail development and maintenance at City park and open space areas. Councilwoman Susan Brooks submitted a City Council Study Session report on May 20, 2014 recommending that staff provide an update to the 1989 Parks Master Plan. Her report stated that "This Plan would be presented to Council and the public for input and feedback regarding the future of our parks and their corresponding programs. This undertaking might require a large amount of staff time and resources, as various communities would be contacted for input and potential Town Hall meetings will likely occur." Subsequently at the July 29, 2014 City Council Meeting, the Council discussed a proposal for a skate plaza to potentially be located on the grounds of Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. The staff report noted that "while there is nothing in the 1989 Master Plan that specifically recommends or discourages a skate park, it is worth noting that the City Council recently directed Recreation staff to conduct a Master Plan update. This update will include Point Vicente Park. Council may wish to consider including SPV's (SkateparkPV) proposal as part of the master plan process." City Council provided updated direction to staff to complete an update of the City's 1989 Park Master Plan that would provide a comprehensive strategy for addressing the future use of the City's parks, recreation and open space resources. The update would consolidate plans that currently exist for a number of major park sites, while being consistent with the City's General Plan and other guiding documents. SkateparkPV's proposal for a skate plaza at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center would also be considered as part of the update effort. A multi-level public outreach process was then undertaken from October 2014 through March 2015 which included an online survey. The outreach effort is discussed in greater detail during the discussion portion of this report. A draft Parks Master Plan was presented to the City Council on June 30, 2015. A number of residents speaking that evening noted concerns about trash, graffiti, crime, safety, and vandalism at City Parks, open space areas and facilities. The City Council shared these same concerns and directed staff to emphasize pro -actively maintaining and improving the appearance of the City's current facilities, parks and operations. Council further directed staff to look into the possibility of "roaming" staff to patrol parks, as well as a general review of staffing needs with a specific emphasis on trash and graffiti issues. These statements echoed concerns that Recreation and Parks staff had heard during a series of Parks Master Plan Workshops 3 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 4 The City Council formally approved the following motions: 1) Remove Gateway Park from the Parks Master Plan. 2) Incorporate the privately funded Skate Plaza into the Parks Master Plan, at Upper Point Vicente Park, with staff directed to work with the Skate Park representatives. 3) Provided general direction acknowledging the concept of "less is more"; to approve modest improvements at Lower Hesse Park and Eastview Park and, to preserve the general character of the other parks; and, to maintain the character of the neighborhoods around the park facilities. 4) Direct staff to return with an analysis of a recommendation to create a full-time staff position to address trash pick-up and graffiti removal, with a budget adjustment if necessary; including a review of full and part-time staffing at park sites. DISCUSSION The Draft Parks Master Plan has been revised to reflect the direction provided by City Council on June 30, 2015. The Gateway Park proposed plan has been removed. No improvements are suggested for that site. The Skate Plaza is incorporated into the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center plan and staff is continuing to meet regularly with their representatives. Staff reviewed the list of recommendations in the June 30 plan and pruned and refined them to reflect the spirit of the "less is more" directive. Particular attention was given to Lower Hesse Park (which is scheduled for the October 20, 2015 City Council meeting) and to Eastview Park. All recommendations were reviewed in light of their potential impact on the existing character of the park in question and the impact on adjacent neighborhoods. Following Council's direction to review park staffing levels and graffiti/trash services in order to better maintain and improve the quality and aesthetics of existing park sites, staff presented a series of proposals that were approved by the City Council. 1) Trash and Graffiti On July 21, 2015 the City Council approved a plan to expand trash collection in City parks from four days a week to seven days a week. Trash collection services was increased from four hours a day, Monday through Friday to eight hours a day seven days a week. Additionally, the City entered into a contract with Graffiti Protective Coatings (contract awarded at August 18, 2015 CC meeting) to remove all reported graffiti incidents within 24 hours. Staff and members of the public can report instances of graffiti to GPC using a smart phone app. Both the enhanced trash collection services and GPC are currently in operation. 2) Increased Park Staffing On August 4, 2015 the City Council approved a plan to expand Recreation part-time staffing presence to enhance park operations and maintenance, adding almost 10,000 part-time hours. Expanded staffing will enhance the City's ability to pro -actively improve operations and better manage and maintain the City's existing park and open space resources. This preventative approach will help protect and maintain the City's popular recreation assets. Added staff will perform the following roles: picking up overflow and scattered trash throughout the park grounds, I Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 5 enforcing park rules, educating the public about appropriate use of parks and open space areas, curbing vandalism, increasing staffed park hours especially during peak hours of operation, and providing higher levels of responsiveness to public complaints and concerns. Eastview Park will now be staffed and roaming staff will visit unstaffed parks such as Vanderlip, Grandview,and Del Cerro on a daily basis to perform inspections, enforce rules and complete work orders. The following chart shows the approved staffing increase: Park Staffing Increase Location/Purpose Hours Roaming Patrol 1,460 Eastview Park 3,650 Hesse Park 1,100 Abalone Cove 2,184 Ladera Linda Park 760 Robert Ryan Park 760 Sub -total 9,914 Staffing increases have already gone into effect at current staffed parks. Recreation and Parks is currently recruiting staff and preparing training materials for both Eastview and roaming staff which are expected to be operational by November, 2015. 3) Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Staffing On Augusts 18, 2015 City Council approved establishing Recreation and Parks Department part- time staffing in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. -Preserve staff will enhance the City's ability to pro -actively improve operations and better manage and maintain the City's existing open space resources. Preserve staff will function much in the same way that recreation staff do at our park sites. They will fill the need for a daily "boots -on -the -ground" presence in the Preserve, proactively assisting with preserve maintenance, establishing a high level of cleanliness, complementing the efforts of Public Works staff and contractors, interacting with the public, and enforcing Preserve rules. The need for a daily staff presence has been heightened by increased attendance at the Preserve, fueled in part by the growing role of social media. This preventative approach will help protect and maintain this beloved and much -used community resource by allowing staff to respond to situations immediately rather than have to submit a work order or report it to through the chain of command. 3,744 annual part-time hours were approved. Recreation and parks staff is currently recruiting and preparing training materials for Preserve staff with a goal of having this program operation by December, 2015. 4) Enforcement Enhancement On August 18, 2015 the Council also tasked staff with researching solutions to address concerns regarding enforcement in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. This issue is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on October 20, 2015. 5 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 6 Recreational Goals/Objectives Several other significant factors were considered in developing the PMPU's recommendations including City recreation standards, City Council goals, General Plan Land designations, Open Space and Recreational Resource policies, and existing partnerships. Oben Sgace and Recreational Resources Policies Although the General Plan Update is currently being reviewed by the Planning Commission, the following is excerpted from the City's 1975 General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element: • Provide appropriate access to public land. • Promote and/or sponsor recreation programs within the City • Encourage local, public, non-profit recreational and cultural activities. • Seek County, State, Federal and private funds to acquire, improve and maintain recreational lands. • Work through the State and Federal government in support of legislation resulting in City acquisition of land. • Encourage institutions to provide public use of their recreation facilities • Encourage the building of playing fields, where appropriate, for multiple uses by various recreational groups. The draft PMPU remains aligned with these policies. Citv Council Goals The City Council sets annual goals. Below are Parks and Recreation -related 2014 goals. Note: the 2015 City Council goals were still being determined at the time of this report. 2014 City Council Goals: • City Trails Enhancement: Complete Trails Network Plan Update (still pending) • Implementation of on-line access to recreation programs and space rentals: Complete "go -live" for Active.net (completed) • Continue with shared use of PVPUSD and City Facilities: City recreation programs to be available at Peninsula High pool and Miraleste Intermediate gym • Continue with evaluation of City recreation programs/sustainability of/demand for programs (completed although staff continues to analyze the comparison of privatized rentals, independent contractors and in-house services. Staff continues to research surrounding jurisdictions to stay current on comparative services and fees) y Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 7 Joint Use Agreements The Recreation and Parks Department has developed a number of partnerships, ongoing relationships, and joint -use agreements with agencies that have expanded and enhanced the recreational opportunities available to City residents and visitors. The PMPU does not alter the City's long-standing policy of pursuing mutually beneficial partnerships. Below is a partial list: • Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority: Park Ranger Services and Junior Ranger Program • Los Serenos de Point Vicente: Docent and Junior Docent Programs • Youth Sports Leagues including AYSO, Little Leagues, US Youth Volleyball League, Pony League, Lacrosse, etc. • Palos Verdes Unified School District: Use of Miraleste Gym and Peninsula High School Pool • Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy: Shared management of Palos Verdes Nature Preserve City Recreational Standards The City's General Plan and the City's Municipal Code (Section 16.20.100c) require four acres of parkland per thousand residents. The General Plan states that the City will "establish ordinances to require builders and developers to provide lands and/or funds for acquisition and development of land for recreational use" and that these lands and/or funds shall "be based on a standard of providing 4 acres of local parkland per 1000 population (City of Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan, page 99)." With a population of 41,643 (2010 U.S. Census), this park acreage standard yields a goal of approximately 165 acres for the City. The City's current park acreage of 278 acres (not including 1,450 acres of open space) far exceeds this goal. The recommendations contained within this Plan will not significantly increase or decrease this number. General Plan Designations The State of California requires a Land Use Element to be included in every local government general plan. According to the State's General Plan Guidelines, the Land Use Element shall designate the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land for housing, business, industry, open space, including agriculture, natural resources, recreation, enjoyment of scenic beauty, education, public buildings and grounds, solid and liquid waste disposal facilities, and other categories of public and private uses of land. The City's General Plan is currently being updated and is currently scheduled for adoption on January 19, 2016. Below is a chart of existing land use designation and proposed land use designations. Any changes to the General Plan that have a significant bearing or impact on the PMPU will be incorporated. The only land use change that is specifically being considered in the PMPU is discussed in the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center section. Below are existing land -use designations and proposed land -use designations. Definitions of land 7 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 8 use designations are below. Park Abalone Cove Shoreline Land Use R -P ProposedExisting Use R-P/OSP Clovercl iff 132-4 R -P Deane Dana Friendship R -P no change Del Cerro R -P no change Don C Wallace Radio Ranch R2-4 no change Eastview R R -P Founders R<_1 R -P Frank A Vanderlip R51 R -P Fred Hesse Jr R -A no change Gateway Park A/1-1/1351 R -P Grandview R -P no change Ladera Linda (City -owned) I -E I -P Ladera Linda (School Dist -owned) I -E no change Los Verdes Golf Course R -A no change Marilyn Ryan R151 R -P Martingale R1-2 R -P Pelican Cove R -P R-P/OSP PVIC R-P/OSP no change Upper Pt Vicente/Civic Center R-P/I-P R-P/1-P/OSP Lower Pt Vicente R -P R-P/OSP Shoreline Park R -P OSP Robert E Ryan R -A no change Vista Catalina R<_1 R -P A Agricultural H Natural Environment/Hazard I -P Institutional public Open Space Preserve (this is a new land use designation being proposed, currently OSP does not exist) R51 Residential equal to or less than 1 du/ac R1-2 Residential 1 to 2 du/ac 112-4 Residential 2 to 4 du/ac R -A Recreational active R -P Recreational passive R Recreational (no active or passive distinction) 2 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 9 Recommendations and Priorities The Parks Master Plan Update has a long list of recommendations on a site by site basis that are phased in over 1-2 years, 3-5 years, and time periods to be determined. Some of the recommendations are already budgeted for or included in the funded or unfunded Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Some smaller projects, such as improvements to general park amenities at all park sites or a shift to drought tolerant landscaping where feasible can be accommodated with existing funds within the Public Works budget. If approved, staff will pursue alternative funding, including grants for unfunded projects. These dollar figures are estimates and may change as projects are further developed and scoped. Given today's challenging economic times, the City will need to deploy its financial resources carefully and thoughtfully to address the identified needs in a cost-effective way. Prinrities • The following list of priorities is based on staff's interpretation of the data gathered through the process to date: • Adopt a "less is more" approach to future park planning and preserve the general character of existing parks. • Identify and apply methods to better protect and maintain existing parks and open space resources. • Be sensitive to potential impacts on part -adjacent neighborhoods. • Complete design process/phasing for Lower Hesse Park • Approve Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project expanded/enhanced indoor improvements. • Continue to address Preserve parking and neighborhood impact issues at Del Cerro Park and adjacent neighborhoods. • Confirm the desired components for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center and initiate Master Plan Process. • Approve a facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for development of new Ladera Linda Park Community Center • Transition to drought -resistant landscaping where feasible. I Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 10 Recommendations Below are the Parks Master Plan Update Recommendations: Details of each park site can be found in the attached PMPU. An updated spreadsheet of recommendations which includes funding and phasing is attached to this report. Some projects are included in the current FY 15-16 Budget, such as Eastview Dog Park, while others are in the 5 -Year CIP (funded and unfunded), while some projects have no identified funding source at this time. These projects reflect the estimated costs of design and construction. Ongoing maintenance and operational costs will need to be developed for approved projects. Abalone Cove Abalone Cove had two significant upgrades completed in 2014, the Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Improvement Project and the Abalone Cove Parking Lot Improvement Project. Improvements included new trails, picnic areas, viewing nodes with telescopes, interpretive panels, a shade structure, native plant landscaping, and discovery zones. The public restroom, staff building and parking lot were significantly improved and an automated pay system was installed for the parking lot. Recommendations: Regrade and re -pave the access road from PVDS to beachfront to improve accessibility for emergency response and maintenance vehicles. Improve site amenities, site -appropriated signage, benches, and picnic tables. Clovercliff Park Clovercliff Park, located on Golden Meadow Drive, is an approximately 7,000 square foot pocket park that has a walking path, is landscaped, and has large rocks that are available for seating with a distant ocean view. Recommendations: • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. Improve walking path, site -appropriate signage, and benches. Del Cerro Park There was significant discussion of Del Cerro Park and parking impact on neighbors due to its proximity to the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve. In April 2015 the City Council directed staff to study parking and access options in the Del Cerro Park area. There have been numerous reports of people parking in neighborhoods adjacent to the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve area. This item was addressed by the City Council on June 16, 2015 and direction was given to staff to allow permit parking in the adjacent neighborhoods, modify on -street parking on Crenshaw Boulevard and establish a resident permit parking program at Del Cerro Park. The Del Cerro Community and residents on Valley View Drive now have resident permit parking. The Island View Community also has approved resident permit parking but are not currently utilizing the program pending further internal implementation discussions. Additionally the striping on the eastside of Crenshaw near Del Cerro Park has been modified to eliminate parking. 10 space on the West- side of Crenshaw have been reserved for resident recreational permit parking only. Forty spaces 10 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 11 on the west -side of Crenshaw are available for public parking. The seventeen space parking lot in Del Cerro Park is available to the public. The Coast Vision Plan's Site Concept Plan for the site has largely been realized. Del Cerro is a donor recognition site for Preserve supporters with augmented and improved paths, amenities and an ADA path to a Preserve outlook. Recommendations: • Implement the Del Gerre Park ocrpaGirty Update Prejectteaddress parking cennerns/neighhorheoid congestion and improve Preserve ooness. (removed from June 30 draft) • install restroom building—(removed from June 30 draft) Note: Installing a restroom is in the current 5 -Year CIP. Given City Council's "less is more" direction, staff is not recommending its inclusion in the PMPU. Review/assess the parking mitigation measures to gauge their effectiveness • Install additional picnic tables and benches. • Shift to drought tolerant landscaping. • Implement native plantings at its upper bluff edge. Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park The property was originally intended as a radio museum with funds for the improvement of the museum to be raised by the Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Foundation. When the required funds were not raised the property became a neighborhood park maintained by the Wallace Ranch Homeowners Association. There are no improvements to the property other than turf and an irrigation system. Recommendation: Approach HOA to consider a shift to drought tolerant planting to replace or reduce the size of the existing grass field. Eastview Park The number one issues discussed at Eastview's public workshops were dogs off leash and a potential dog park. Off -leash dogs are a common occurrence at Eastview, which has a reputation as being essentially an off -leash facility, even though there is a leash law is in effect at all City parks. Staff has received numerous complaints about residents who feel uneasy or have had unpleasant encounters with off -leash dogs. A dog park would not eliminate this issue, but it would be part of the solution, providing an opportunity for dog owners to legally have their dogs off -leash while keeping other park free from off -leash dogs. Public workshops elicited concerns about the project and significant opposition, although the online survey had strong support. The proposed Eastview Dog Park would have both small and large dog runs. The proposed location currently has ample, existing shade trees and would have seating areas, access to water, public restrooms, and sufficient parking. The location is buffered from commercial buildings to the west, is compatible with the land use designation and has approval from the Sanitation District. 11 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 12 The dog park will be unstaffed and have fixed hours of operation consistent with the parks current hours. Staff will utilize existing, approved rule signage from the Rancho Caninos Dog Park. Staff Office: There are currently no staffed parks on the eastside of the City. One of the recommendations for Eastview Park is to install a small, portable staff office that would be occupied by Recreation part-time staff. Note: City Council recommended on June 30, 2015 that improvements at Eastview Park be modest in scope. Council approved staffing at Eastview on August 4, 2015. Recommendations: • Build dog park. Install fitness stations along walking paths. (removed from June 30 draft) • Install staff office (portable). install shade StrU GWres. (removed from June 30 draft) • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans. • Improve/widen walking paths. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. Founders Park The site is adjacent to the Trump National Golf Course Improvements and includes picnic tables, a gazebo, nearby restrooms, coastal access, walking and biking trails and landscaping. This park, which is dedicated to the courageous visionaries who helped found the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, has tremendous views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina Island. A portion of the site can be reserved for weddings and other ceremonial events. The park is fully maintained by Trump National Golf Course. Recommendations: • Continue ongoing relationship with Trump National staff to maintain the attractive appearance and accessibility of park. • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible. W Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 13 Frank A. Vanderlip Sr. Park This approximately 5 acre park located at 6500 Seacove Drive. Unobstructed views of the ocean, headlands and islands are the main attraction at this park. Recommendations: • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park Hesse Park was acquired from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District. The purchase was completed in two transactions over a five-year period beginning in 1976. Upper Hesse Park: Development of the facility was completed in September 1983 at a cost of $3,715,405. This park, with its well -manicured parkland and active community center, is one of the most popular in the City. Among the features available for public enjoyment in the upper park area are baseball and soccer fields, numerous picnic tables with barbecues, playground equipment suitable for toddlers to adolescents, and a well-used'/4 mile walking path. Most of the City's privatized recreation classes are offered at this facility and many Peninsula Senior activities are held here. Additionally three rooms in the 7,300 square foot community center are available for rental for meetings and private parties. Lower Hesse Park: A system of trails, two picnic areas, sand volleyball court, and a parking lot were completed in July 1999. Further improvements to this area have been in a planning/ design phase since 2005. Conceptual designs were prepared in 2011 which included extensive landscape and trail improvements and active elements such as a basketball court, tennis court, paved parking lot, and a small structure which would include a public restroom, staff office and storage. The City Council directed staff in 2012 to work with the Pacific View HOA to scale back the project and phase in improvements. A draft plan featuring improvements and enhancements to the existing trails and amenities has been prepared for the site with phases including an initial phase funded at $500,000. Staff presented the plan to the Pacific View HOA on September 14 and, after making refinements, presented an updated plan with an expanded alternative to all Homeowner Associations at a public workshop on September 21. Staff is currently updating the plan based on feedback from that meeting. Note: This item is scheduled to be presented to the City Council on October 20, 2015. The basic and enhanced plans will include no active recreational components besides improving the existing sand volleyball court. Recommendations: • Install fitness stations along walking path. • Install shade ctrUnti iroc. (removed from June 30 draft) • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. • Upgrade existing picnic tables, benches, and trash/recycling cans. • Gonctn Gt tFiGYGIe moth for tots. (removed from June 30 draft) • Fiber eptiG GabliRg allewing for Unified nommuninatien with (mity Holl (removed from June 30 draft) 13 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 14 • Install solar power system on community building. • Replace fencing on northern border of property. • Stabilize the existing view point at the edge of western lawn in Upper Hesse and add benches. • Replace current railroad tie stairs with concrete stairs. • Incorporate results of Lower Hesse Park Improvement Project once completed (scheduled to be presented to City Council on October 20, 2015). Gateway Park Background Information When the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve was first created in 2004, an approximately 25 -acre portion was set aside at the southern tip of the Portuguese Bend Reserve to be used as an Active Recreation Area (ARA). Subsequently, in 2008, the City Council adopted Coast Vision Plan, which identified the area, now known as Gateway Park, to be the future home of an equestrian center with riding rings and public parking that would also serve as a trailhead to the Preserve. None of the proposed improvements would consist of permanent structures because of the active land movement in the area. The equestrian center improvements were envisioned to be sponsored by the local equestrian community. To date, no formal request to construct the improvements from the equestrian community has been received by the City. On April 1, 2014, the City Council reconfigured and reduced the size of Gateway Park from 25 - acres to 18 -acres. At this same meeting, the Council also removed the 40 -acre Archery Range property located on the opposite side of Palos Verdes Drive South from the Preserve. The Management Agreement with the Palos Verdes Land Conservancy was amended to reflect these changes. Subsequently, staff prepared a conceptual plan for Gateway Park to serve as the main parking area and southern "gateway" to the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The concept was developed in part to relieve some of the parking and congestion problems that have developed on Crenshaw Boulevard and the area around Del Cerro Park. The concept plan was presented to the community through the PMPU process and consists of the following elements: • Dirt access road and parking lot with approximately 30 parking spaces, including several spaces large enough for horse trailers • Picnic tables and seating areas • Hitching posts • Staff/Ranger drop-in trailer (portable) • Public restrooms (portable) • Interpretive and educational information on portable kiosks • Emergency vehicle access Gateway Park would be a staffed park site, and staff would further educate the public on the rules of the Preserve. Because Gateway Park sits within an active landslide, all improvements would be temporary and mobile. 14 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 15 ,.a._ Gateway Park nj 4 - Proposed Proposed Gateway Layout Public Input: Numerous strong concerns were expressed during the PMPU public outreach process regarding this proposal including safety, security, and the area's fragile geology. Residents expressed concerns that visitors would park at Gateway Park and then cross Palos Verdes Drive South to access the beaches and coves. Many residents referenced a tragedy that occurred on July 4m 2014 where an individual drowned and numerous rescues were necessary due to high surf conditions. Social media and increased public awareness of sites such as Abalone Cove and the Nature Preserve were also identified as concerns. Gateway Park was by far the most controversial topic addressed during the public outreach process Recommendation: Based on City Council's direction on June 30, 2015, no improvements at Gateway Park are recommended. Grandview Park Grandview Park offers a large opportunity for development and meeting community recreational needs since it is 18 acres of completely undeveloped parkland. However, because of the site's challenging topography and that it is undeveloped, substantial grading and installation of utilities will be required and will add to the cost of developing the site. In 2010, City Council approved a conceptual plan for Grandview Park, including improved access, amenities, and recreational elements. At the time of this Parks Master Plan Update, the conceptual plans were undergoing the Mitigated Negative Declaration environmental analysis. Recommendations: • Dependent on the results on the environmental analysis process, proceed with the "Sycamore Option" beginning with Phase 1 which would include construction of a natural 15 y� T 14. .Y aA ,.a._ Gateway Park nj 4 - Proposed Proposed Gateway Layout Public Input: Numerous strong concerns were expressed during the PMPU public outreach process regarding this proposal including safety, security, and the area's fragile geology. Residents expressed concerns that visitors would park at Gateway Park and then cross Palos Verdes Drive South to access the beaches and coves. Many residents referenced a tragedy that occurred on July 4m 2014 where an individual drowned and numerous rescues were necessary due to high surf conditions. Social media and increased public awareness of sites such as Abalone Cove and the Nature Preserve were also identified as concerns. Gateway Park was by far the most controversial topic addressed during the public outreach process Recommendation: Based on City Council's direction on June 30, 2015, no improvements at Gateway Park are recommended. Grandview Park Grandview Park offers a large opportunity for development and meeting community recreational needs since it is 18 acres of completely undeveloped parkland. However, because of the site's challenging topography and that it is undeveloped, substantial grading and installation of utilities will be required and will add to the cost of developing the site. In 2010, City Council approved a conceptual plan for Grandview Park, including improved access, amenities, and recreational elements. At the time of this Parks Master Plan Update, the conceptual plans were undergoing the Mitigated Negative Declaration environmental analysis. Recommendations: • Dependent on the results on the environmental analysis process, proceed with the "Sycamore Option" beginning with Phase 1 which would include construction of a natural 15 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 16 parking lot, restrooms/office, play area, picnic area, and landscaping. Initiate a facilitated design/pubic outreach/phasing process for the remaining elements of Grandview Park, including activity lawn, viewing nodes, discovery area, flexible cycling area and walking trails. Ladera Linda Park In 2013, SA Associates, an engineering firm, was hired to assess the current condition of existing public structures in the City. In the resulting Infrastructure Report Card, the Ladera Linda Community Center received an overall infrastructure score of "F" (Fail). This rating is given to those building that are in very poor condition. The Infrastructure Report Card utilizes grading criterion that the general public can relate to, similar to the grading used in education. It is the same criterion used by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in grading the condition of public infrastructure. Based on those findings, the main recommendation is to build a new community center. Recommendations: Development of New Community Center: • Develop a facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for a new Ladera Linda Park Community Center. (note: On September 1, 2015 the City Council authorized staff to proceed with the creation of a Request for Proposal for a Ladera Linda Park Master Plan. Staff intends to prepare a draft RPF for approval at an upcoming City Council meeting with a goal of sending it out to experienced firms by November, 2015 • Incorporate expanded Nature Center/Preserve Annex and Sheriff/Ranger drop-in office into Master Plan Process. • Upon completion of Master Plan Process, proceed with demolition of existing buildings and construction of new Community Center. Additional Site Improvements: • IRstallll shade StF M MS On lewer level and paddle teRRio level. (removed from June 30 draft) • Pave access road between lower and middle parking lots. • install we beGGe ball-eeUrts adjacent tepaddle tennis Geurts. (removed from June 30 draft) • Improve landscaping on existing multi -use playing field. • Upgrade surfacing of current asphalt play area. • Retain the two existing basketball courts. • Add-GRe teee+sGeUFt. (removed from June 30 draft) • Add +e+ triGyGle GOse—.(removed from June 30 draft) • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible. • Install interior paddle tennis fencing separating the two courts. Most recommendations above should be done in conjunction with Community Center development. 16 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 17 Lower Point Vicente Park/Point Vicente Interpretive Center Lower Point Vicente Park was one of the key sites identified in the Coast Vision Plan. As a result of the Vision Plan process, a Community Focus committee was assembled to develop the vision for Lower Point Vicente. A revised plan for the site was approved by the City Council on July 7, 2015. The conceptual design for the site now contains the following recommended components: • Maintain the existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center • Improve and expand parking and vehicular access: Parking, driveways, and drop-off areas should be provided in order to serve all site uses. • Assure pedestrian access: A pedestrian portal and trailhead along Palos Verdes Drive West at the north side of the site allows for pedestrian access into the new open space areas. • Formalize Open Space and Trail Networks: A new trailhead and trail system encompassing an enhanced existing bluff-fron trail, as well as new connections through and around the site inland would open access across the site, connect to the Preserve Trail system and extend towards the bluff and the Upper Point Vicente sites. • Open space and picnic (grassland) areas are to be planted with native and locally appropriate vegetation. • A bioswale is included along the north side of the site and through the parking area(s). This naturalized feature would help capture and filter storm water runoff, as well as provide habitat. • Noise and visual impact: Care should be taken to avoid negative impact on the site's neighbors as well as drivers and cyclists along the adjacent roadway, through sound mitigation, preservation of sight lines, and related design strategies. A number of outdoor educational exhibits on World War II history, a Tongva Village, and dry framing were removed from the site concept plan at the July 7t" meeting and a City Wall of Honor was shifted to City Hall. Below is the approved concept plan for Lower Point Vicente. 17 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 18 tower Paint Wcente concept Pkm (Rmu dO7.22=* 196 H Native Pkrd 2alx I►val R i( � qn la l fi -._�i _,-fr----_�- �� _rr � -.,. ti x� •ter � 951 j ♦ A jrj i fl 2 t e { �'10 I �r % 7 i6EY_ - Y 17. !_ F+cln1 YlCenle Irderprehwa -,.. � _..+ l� �R by 2. PcgIOngLai'M'N, &A3M`alCs 3. Gnnsknd i Rtazir 6. Pf mk , Ar lb be plat= d $uawgho 41 -- iVam kralNelwcrc ,,r{ 4! '- - S..—da y Ti I- o, S.& Bi amale md A cj= el hl3hr7af iWfiel -- PFap,ml'r Linc ° �� Freeartr'terxied seP�al.ion helwean � and p,ape ly Ene 196 H.mh C ICJ'' ]44 A planning/design effort was also underway at the time of the Master Plan's submission for indoor exhibits which will upgrade, enhance, and unify the museum's current exhibits. Staff and members of Los Serenos de Point Vicente Docents are currently working with an exhibit designer and seeking grant funding for the projects. The results of that process are recommended to be incorporated into the Master Plan once the initial design is finalized and approved by the City Council. Recommendations: • Implement Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project • Incorporate Phase II Interior Exhibit Update into Master Plan once process is complete and approved by Council. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible • Install Solar Power System on the Point Vicente Interpretive Center building Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 19 Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park Marilyn Ryan Park, located on Ocean Trails Drive, has tremendous views of Trump National Golf Course and the Pacific Ocean. The park features picnic tables, benches, a water fountain, a dolphin statue and a bridge named in honor of LAPD Swat Officer Randall Simmons who was killed in the line of duty. The park is named for the original Mayor of Rancho Palos Verdes. The property is maintained by Trump National Golf Course. Recommendations: Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible. Continue to maintain positive working relationship with Trump National to maintain attractive appearance and appropriate uses of the park. Martingale Trailhead Park This parcel was designated for construction as a trailhead park and to establish easements for a fifteen foot wide equestrian trail that traverses this parcel as well as Lots 20 and 21 of the same tract. Park improvements were completed and the park was dedicated in 1990. The site is located in an Equestrian Overlay District. The trailhead provides access to a trails system serving the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills and Rolling Hills Estates. Both hikers and equestrians utilize this park. Improvements include landscaping, a tri -level drinking fountain which serves horses, humans and small animals, a mounting block, and a seating rock. Recommendation: • Upgrade existing amenities including water fountain and signage. Pelican Cove Formerly known as Point Vicente Fishing Access, Pelican Cove features a paved parking lot, restroom building, improved trail to the shoreline, and incredible Catalina Island and ocean views. Native plantings surround the parking lot which links to the public parking lot at Terranea and the adjacent coastal trail system. The parking lot, restroom building, and the landscaping is maintained by the Terranea Resort pursuant to the Council -adopted Terranea Maintenance Agreement. Recommendation: • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Backaround Information The size of the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center property, combined with its spectacular ocean views, few nearby neighbors and location adjacent to City Hall, has made it a focal point for potential development plans and site improvements throughout the City's history. The property, which boasts spectacular coastal and ocean views, is a tremendous resource that could potentially accommodate a number of civic, recreation, and cultural needs for the community. The property consists of three components: 19 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 20 Point Vicente Park The 65.12 acres of park land that was acquired from the Federal Government after its use as a NIKE Missile Base was closed and the property was declared surplus by the General Services Administration (GSA). The majority of the park is part of the Alta Vicente Nature Reserve, which is part of the larger 1,450 -acre Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, and has been set aside for habitat preservation under the Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP). In addition to the habitat areas and existing public trail network, other land uses include a 5.5 -acre farm, an unpaved public parking lot and an emergency helipad. By permit, model helicopters are allowed to be flown in a designated area surrounding a helipad. Civic Center The 8.23 acres of designated Civic Center was purchased from GSA in two parcels. There are no use restrictions on the land acquired by the City in -fee for Civic Center use. The Civic Center includes the City Hall offices, maintenance yard, an open grassy areas, a sand volleyball court, one tennis court and the "Rancho Caninos" temporary dog park. This is the site of the City's annual July 4t" Independence Day Celebration. Palos Verdes on the Net, Peninsula Volunteer Alert Network (PVAN) and Peninsula Seniors also have facilities on the property. Coast Guard The U.S. Coast Guard also owns a 3.93 acre parcel located on the west promontory overlooking the Point Vicente Lighthouse, which is the site of several communications towers and a historic WWII -era artillery bunker. Active Recreational ODDortunities Point Vicente Park is conditioned by deed to allow continuous public access for recreational use in perpetuity. The land may not be sold or transferred to any entity other than another governmental agency, and then only with the consent of the Department of the Interior. The park land has an approved Program of Utilization (POU) that describes future development. Any change to that Program must be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Parks and Recreation. The park land may not be leased and any concession agreement for operation of recreational facilities must be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Recreation and Parks. While the majority of the park is restricted for passive recreation, the POU identifies a 6.6 -acre area in the northern portion of the property to be used for active recreational purposes. However, this area of the site is now part of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, where active recreation would not be permitted. According to the Conservation & Open Space Elements section of the City's General Plan, "Any changes in land use to the property through future Master Planning efforts would require approval by the Planning Commission and City Council through public hearings along with review and approval of a change, if necessary, to the Program of Utilization by the National Park Service." Staff approached the National Park Service in 2014 about the possibility of moving the 6.6 -acre active recreation area from its current location adjacent to the Villa Capri Condominiums to the upper portion of the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities. In September 2014, the National Park Service representative concurred that this proposal would be consistent with the site's POU (see attached email). A potential 91 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 21 reconfiguration of the 6.6 -acre area to the upper portion of the site is depicted in yellow in the aerial photograph below: Proposed ±6.6 -Acre Active Recreation Area LADA NIKE Site 55, Point Vicente, Rancho Palos Verdes (GSA No. 9 -D -Calif -1088) Potential Skate Park/Plaza On April 15th, 2014, the Council tasked the Director of Recreation and Parks to work with the Skatepark PV Inc. (SPV) Board of Directors to review, evaluate and modify as necessary, the skate park proposal by SPV and report back to the City Council with a recommendation specifically addressing the feasibility of allowing a privately funded skate park to be constructed at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. Staff analyzed the feasibility of the project by looking at a number of factors including a) needs assessment; b) consistency with the 1989 Parks Master Plan; c) consistency with the 2008 Coast Vision Plan; d) Program of Utilization/Zoning; e) financial/liability analysis; and f) visual/aesthetic concerns. Upon completion of the analysis, staff believes that, if it is the desire of the Council and the community to have such a facility at Point Vicente Park, it would be feasible to construct a skate park on the property that conforms with the site's current zoning/land use deed restrictions, and that issues concerning financing, insurance and visual/aesthetic concerns could be addressed through the proper agreements, operating procedures, and project design/site placement. Council directed staff to update the Parks Master Plan prior to making a decision regarding the SPV skate park proposal. It was Staff's position that a skate park is a feasible component that would serve a wide range of people, but particularly the traditionally underserved teenager and young adult population. A skate park received a 4 out of 5 on Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Workshop comment cards, strong support from the Tape Dot Exercise, and slightly more respondents choosing to support the skate park, over don't support it on the online survey. (Note: 21 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 22 the term "skate park" was used on the online survey, rather than SPV's preferred "skate plaza" nomenclature. This was done for the sake of clarity because "skate park" is a more common name for such a facility.) RVP MULTI -USE PLAZA 0 Pillar MULTI -USE AREA PLAN. Deriryn Skudf•� RANCHO PALOS VERGES, Cr- Overview F Overview of proposed 15,000 square foot skate plaza location A privately funded Skate Plaza was approved for inclusion into the PMPU on June 30, 2015. The skate plaza is to be located at Upper Point Vicente Park and staff are currently working with the SPV representatives. Staff and SPV are engaged in a detailed dialogue about the project's scope including square footage, design, fundraising, parking image, potential number and age of users, hours of operation and other topics. The proposed 15,000 square foot design may be larger than needed. Several Councilmembers expressed concern about its size and prominent location. The chart below details a number of South Bay skate parks, most of which are less than 15,000 square feet. The very popular Peck Park Skate Park in San Pedro, for example, is approximately 8,000 square feet. A smaller footprint would also allow for more flexibility in where the skate park is located on site and how it is configured, leaving additional room for other components, additional parking, or a larger village green. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center has ample space, is located on a major street, and can be accessed by public transportation. Skateboarders would not be able to access the location by skateboard due an existing skateboarding ban on Hawthorne Boulevard. Skatepark Oppostion Minimal active anti -skate park or skate plaza reaction was received during the public outreach process. In the last several weeks staff has received a large number of emails (see attachments) from residents who are opposed to a skate park in general and especially at this site. Many of the emails expressed variants on the theme that a skate park will only serve a small percentage MIA Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 23 of the community. Concerns were expressed about the potential size of the skatepark (the proposal from SkatePark PV stated a 15,000 sq foot skate plaza), potential liability, traffic impacts, and the possibility that skateboarders from throughout the Southern California area would come to this site. Many people noted that they were not aware that the inclusion of a skate plaza had been approved by the City Council. 135 people have signed a Moveon.org online petition opposing a skate park as of September 28, 2015 and 650 have signed a written petition as of September 29th. Copies of both petitions are attached to this report. A number of emails also expressed support for a pool or community center. It is worth noting that the MoveOn org petition site describes the skate park as privately owned. SkateParkPV has stated that they would privately fund the park, but it would be owned by the City. A petition from SkateParkPV in support of the skate plaza has recently been submitted and is attached to this report. SKATE PARK SQUARE FOOTAGES Facilities located with the South Bay Cities Boundary FACILITY ADDRESS/CITY SURFACE SIZE / SF COMMENTS Alondra 3353 Redondo Beach, Lawndale Concrete 14,000 Channel Street 700 W. Channel, San Pedro Concrete 10,000 Compton 123 N. Rose, Compton Concrete 12,000 EI Segundo Youth 405 E. Grand, EI Segundo Concrete 4,000 Eucalyptus Park / Larry Guidi 12100 Inglewood, Hawthorne Concrete 10,000 Hermosa 710 Pier, Hermosa Beach Concrete 10,000 Peck Park 560 Western, San Pedro Concrete 8,000 Veterans 22400 Moneta, Carson Concrete 10,000 Wilmington 325 Neptune, Wilmington Concrete 10,000 Wilson Park 2200 Crenshaw, Torrance Wood / Concrete 23,000 Closed indefinitely (repairs needed) Sept.' 15 Community Pool Potential Private/Public Partnership Recreation staff met in late June, 2015 with John Schoenfeld, President of JACO builders and RPV resident Bill Kao. They expressed their interest in a private/public partnership with the City for a swim training facility at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. The conceptual site plan created by Mr. Schoenfeld includes an active multi-purpose facility complete with public areas, a gym, weight room, offices, locker room, and bleachers all built around an Olympic -sized pool. The stated plan would call for Mr. Kao's group, with him acting as the Principal, to finance, build, and operate the complex for a prescribed number of years after which the complex would revert to the City. Staff have not met with Mr. Kao and Mr. Schoenfeld since that initial meeting, but they are welcome and encouraged to be a part of the Master Plan process for this site if that process is approved by Council (Letter and conceptual plan attached). 23 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 24 Pool Petition An online "Change-org" pro -RPV pool petition supporting a community pool at Point Vicente Park/Civic has been signed by 220 supporters as of September 29, 2015. A copy of the petition cover page is attached. Recommendations: • Authorize a facilitated Master Plan Design and Public Outreach Process for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center using the Coast Vision Plan Long Term Plan as a base planning document with the inclusion of a skate park. Include the following components be considered during the site's Master Plan Process: ✓ City Hall ✓ Community Center ✓ Skate Park/Plaza (approved June 30, 2015) ✓ Outdoor Swimming Pool ✓ Shade Structures ✓ Children's Playground ✓ Walking paths w/fitness stations ✓ Enhanced amenities: picnic tables, benches, trash/recycling cans/BBQs ✓ Improved Village Green ✓ Tennis courts ✓ Permanent dog park ✓ Wall of Honor Direct staff to continue the process to shift the 6.6 acre parcel from its current location along the northerly boundary of the lower portion of Point Vicente to the upper portion of the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities. Incorporate results of Public Works Corporation Storage Yard Relocation process to study the possibility of spreading out the storage yard to strategic locations throughout the City with a smaller central office at City Hall, thereby increasing the efficiency of Public Works operations and allow for the potential development of all or part of the existing maintenance yard. RPV Beach: RPV Beach was acquired as part of the Trump National Golf Course Development Agreement. The public beach is accessible by steep trail via Trump National Golf Course and Founders Park. Recommendation: • Make no changes to this site. Robert E. Ryan Park Ryan Park was originally constructed and owned by the County of Los Angeles. Ryan Park is named for City Founder and former Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor Robert E. Ryan. The park's former name was Rancho Palos Verdes Park. Upon the incorporation of the City of Rancho Palos M Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 25 Verdes, title to the park was transferred from the County to the City. This park features a community building with a small activity room and patio which are available for rent, a tot lot, playground, picnic areas with barbecues, fields, and a baseball diamond. Views from this park are superior, and the mature trees add to the atmosphere. Recommendations: • Remodel or build new community building. Original building dates back to the 1960s. Larger building could accommodate more rentals and classes. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible. • Improved Amenities: Benches, picnic tables, BBQs, trash/recycling cans. • , ;stall shade struGtures in the „iG„iG areas. (removed from June 30 draft) Vista Catalina Park Vista Catalina is a small pocket park located adjacent to PV Drive South at the main entrance to Trump National across from Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park. The Park has magnificent views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina Island. Recommendations: • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible • Continue to work with Trump National staff to maintain its attractive appearance and accessibility. RELATED PLANS Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Public Use Master Plan (PUMP) The Palos Verdes Nature Preserve (Preserve) encompasses approximately 1,400 acres comprised of eleven individual Reserves, 424 acres of which consists of the Portuguese Bend Reserve. The Preserve is owned by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (except 20 acres of Agua Amarga Reserve that is owned by the PVPLC) and is managed by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy (PVPLC) for ecological values and habitat restoration. This preserve is home to coastal sage scrub habitat, a community of intensely fragrant and highly drought resistant native shrubs and flowering plants. Living throughout this rare habitat are many different animals, including the threatened California gnatcatcher and coastal cactus wren and two species of endangered butterflies. The individual reserves provide excellent recreational opportunities, as they are full of networks of hiking, equestrian, and bicycle trails. There are 33 miles of hiking, equestrian, and mountain bike trails available to the public. The Preserve PUMP Committee was established in 2006 and addresses issues germane to the Preserve such as public access, trailhead locations, parking, trail use, fencing, signage and lighting. The Preserve Trails Plan was adopted by the City Council in 2008, and the PUMP document, which includes the Preserve Trails Plan, was adopted by the City Council on April 2, 2013. 25 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 26 The Palos Verdes Nature Preserve already has a well-established system for receiving public input, reporting incidents, and initiating changes, and pursuing enhancements to the existing Preserve. This includes the quarterly Preserve public forum meetings held by the City and the PVPLC. The PUMP is subject to periodic review and updates by the City Council with input from the public. Trails Network Plan Update A significant effort to combine and unify the various City trails -related plan is currently underway. Four public workshops have already been conducted thus far and and continue to occur with the next workshop scheduled for October 21 st. The Trails Network Plan Update is being facilitated by the Community Development Department and seeks to consolidate and update the following plans: ✓ Conceptual Bikeways Plan -updated 1996 ✓ Conceptual Trails Plan- updated 1993 ✓ Preserve Trails Plan ✓ Ocean Front Estates Trails ✓ Terranea Resort Trails ✓ Trump National Trails ✓ California Coastal Trail Proposed changes are subject to public input and City Council approval and will be reviewed for consistency with the PMPU. The trail related "Connections" section of the Coastal Vision Plan will be incorporated into the TNP update process. Coast Vision Plan Incorporation Desian Guidance Section 5 of the Coast Vision Plan "Design Guidance" (contained in Appendix C) is included in the PMPU as a planning tool for future park projects. The goals of the "Design Guidance" section are as follows: • Respect and use the natural slope and character of key sites. • Be sensitive of neighbor's views to key sites, and maximize views from those sites. • Capitalize on the natural setting of Rancho Palos Verdes, and take the indoors outdoors by spilling interior space onto walkways and public open spaces. Bring the outdoors into buildings by opening interior spaces to views and natural light. • Ensure that site desiign is integrated and serves the whole system of the community in terms of program, user needs, context and sustainability. • Preserve and enhance the environmental quality of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes as well as the marine ecosystems along its coastline. Develop key sites and on-site parking in an environmentally sustainable manner. • Maximize the City's water resources by capturing and maximizing the use of rainwater and sensitively managed urban runoff. Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 27 The section also has broad design considerations addressing parking circulation, public gathering areas, building siting, water management and conservation, building and architectural features design, building configuration, suggested materials and colors, "green" building design, and historic adaptation. Coast Vision Plan Connections The Coast Vision Plan's "Connections" section has design and planning guidance for trailheads and vista points that would prove helpful in planning and implementing future enhancements to City parks. The Updated Coast Vision Plan (including Connections and Design Guidance section are attached). Public Outreach Process A robust public outreach process was undertaken which included the following components: • Mass mailing to all City residences in October 2014 • Updates on the City's Website • Creation of a Parks Master Plan Update City Webpage • Multiple Listsery messages • Multiple Notifications on Facebook and Nextdoor • Online Recreation Activity Guides • Public Banners • Press Releases • Notifications to Homeowner Associations • Mailings to residences adjacent to parks discussed at public workshops • Contacting stakeholders and interested parties The two major components of the public outreach process were a series of twelve public workshops held from November 2014 through February 2015 and an informal online survey, conducted using the online survey website, Survey Monkey. The facilitated public workshops focused on particular park sites and were designed to obtain detailed feedback on current and possible uses at each location. Two workshops each were held regarding the five following park sites: Eastview Park, Ladera Linda Park, Point Vicente Park/Civic Center, Upper Hesse Park, and Gateway Park. The public workshop process concluded with two general workshops which covered the five focus parks sites, as well as all other park sites and open space areas. While public workshops tend to attract people who live near to a particular site or have an interest in a particular recreation topic, a survey generates more general, community -wide responses to a series of recreation topics. The online survey was approved by the City Council and was subsequently completed by 743 respondents from November 21, 2014 to its closing on March 15, 2015. Questions ranged from general attitudes about parks and open space topics to very specific questions about support for components at Ladera Linda Park and Point Vicente 27 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 28 Park/Civic Center. This was not a professional survey or statistically valid, but its results did provide many useful insights. The following is an overview of the findings and conclusions of the 2014-15 Parks Master Plan Update public outreach process. A more thorough analysis of the public outreach effort can be found in the attached Parks Master Plan Update. Appendix D has the complete public outreach documents including online survey results, all emails received, public workshop "tape dot" exercises, meeting summaries and comment card results. Online Survey Analysis 743 total responses were received from November 2014 through March 2015. 87% of respondents indicated that they lived in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Responses were received from all sections of the City. 75% of respondents rated the City's Recreation and Parks Department as either "great" or "good" on its ability to provide physical parks and facilities to the public. Sixty-two percent rated the Department as "great" or "good" on its ability to provide recreation programs, activities and events. Overall, how would you rate the City of Overall, how would you rate the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department in its ability to provide physical Department in its ability to provide physical parks and facilities., to the public? Check parks and facilitie¢> to the public? Check the appropriate circle. the appropriate circle. Answered: ]% Shipped.:? 0.naxered: 7M 5l pp d:7 G—t M Great Goad Adequate Falx, Ha[meeting expectadnna Gaad Adequa4 FBif Not meeting expectaliona Respondents were asked to indicate their general address by filling in their cross streets. Below is a graphic representation of RPV resident respondent locations. Larger circles indicate a higher number of respondents from particular cross streets. The lowest level of responses came from the eastern section of the City while the most responses came from the southern area near Ladera Linda and the northwest section of the City. Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 29 CROSS STRE T5 - TORRANCE LOMITA f— PALOS VERDES ESTATES oL u ROLLING HILLS ESTATES V o� ROLLIhJO HILLS ii O No. of People ;, LAS AN = E: 32 t — --J i i 16-17 13-15 11-12 9-10 N 7-8 5-6 C 3-4 1-2 Miles 0 0.35 0.7 1.4 In order to get a sense of how survey respondents spend their leisure time, a number of recreation activities and options were presented. Respondents were asked to check all activities that they participated in on a monthly basis. Not surprisingly, given the City's emphasis on open space and trails, 87% of respondents selected "hiking, walking and jogging" which was by far the most popular choice. Other notable results include "Swimming" (29%), "Going to the beach" (56%), "Skateboarding" (22%), "Using a dog park " (29%), "Working Out at a Gym" (36%), "road biking" (19%), "picnicking or relaxing at a local park" (40%), "Tennis" (15%), "Participating in senior programs" (14%), and `Mountain biking" (11 %). 29 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 30 Surnng F r-0eta riding ■ G:Igg Cr±tna te3th Skate:0 a rd I n g UBIng.9rk VV6rkbV Out at a gyre F&-rbclpating In senlcar_.. Gc#nng Rcad blking it Plczrl,Ing or re&axing at ... Tennis Pw Parbopatmg In an RPV_.. Atfimu Ir a _ RPV ap=sC=... Nlrwntaln Mirrg Playlrig basaball Pl3ying :?.ac--,er PIs�'Ing aO All playing res ll Playing wclleyball 41% 141% 20% 3056 40°1 SCS E+0% w 80% 1CIU: 30 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 31 The survey revealed moderate support for developing additional recreation elements such as playing fields and basketball or tennis courts (44% support/33% don't support) and greater support for building physical facilities such as a community center, gym, pool, or children's playground (52% support/30% don't support). Development of additional playing fields and outdoor recreation elements such as basketball or tennis courts i4na'Avfad: 717 WppM:2G ovn't aegtpat — Hare vo ORM- ]W_ 1-0% 20% 30% 40% 51% FA`.< _ e 61% ;Ch 1-1_': Building of physical recreation facilities such as a community center, gymnasium, pool or children's playground 6neNY:rM 7V-ipd&7: i. Support Cin'[ support — _ . 1.'i 29% 3G% 40% 51 W% 7v% aj% 9M 10G% Public support for preserving undeveloped land for wildlife and natural habitat remains strong at 82% with only 7% not supporting the idea. This high level of support for open space dovetails with the 87% of respondents who say they hike or walk on a monthly basis, as well as respondents who ride horses (8%) or go mountain biking (11 %). A significant portion of the survey focused on two sites: Point Vicente Park/Civic Center (City Hall) and Ladera Linda Community Center. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center was selected because a large percentage of its flat, developable area is currently undeveloped and it has been the focus of previous planning processes including the Coast Vision Plan and Open Space Task Force efforts. Ladera Linda Community Center was selected because it has been identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan as being a candidate for renovation or demolition/rebuilding because of the poor condition of its buildings and infrastructure. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center: Online Survey Results Survey respondents were asked to indicate whether they supported, didn't support or had no opinion about various possible components at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. The components that received the highest level of support were a band shell or amphitheater, skate park, village green, permanent dog park, and a children's playground. A chart of survey response is shown below. 31 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 32 Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Survey Responses Below is a summary of survey open-ended questions regarding Point Vicente ParkCivic Center. The topics that received the most positive responses were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Online Survey: Point Vicente Survey Open Ended SUMMARY Support. Don't Sup part No Opinion Building a n141ltiple-spoit gymna5Wrn 33.24% 42.42% 74.U% Building an outdoor swimming pool 37.41% 43.53% 19.0s% Adding more outdoor tennis or paddle tennis courts 29.07% 41.31% 29.62% Building a band shell or amphitheater SS.os% 23.64% 21 Building a skate park 42.569M6 41,86% 15. Adding: playing fields for soccer, baseball and other field sports 37.97% 35,53% 26.15% Creating a village green with gardens and walkways 62.03% 16.97% 11% Providing a permanent dog park 51.60% 30.74% 17.&6%— 7.Building Bu i I di ngwalking paths with f itness stations 67.45% 17.25% 15 Building outdoor basketball courts 34.7796 35.47% 29.76- Building bocce ball courts 27.82% 35.61% 36.59% Building a children's playground 51.74% 23.64% 24.61% Building a tricycle park for tots 28.7996 40.79% 34 Building an arts/cultural center 34.77% 38.39% 26. Below is a summary of survey open-ended questions regarding Point Vicente ParkCivic Center. The topics that received the most positive responses were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Online Survey: Point Vicente Survey Open Ended SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 24 2. No skateboard park 4 3. Pro -Pool 9 4. Pro -Dog park 7 5. Sports Related 25 6. Open Spaces/Trails Hiking/Nature/Gardens 29 7. Equestrian 2 8. Community Center/Youth Activities/Facility Rentals 15 9. Seniors 4 10. Youth 4 11. General Facility/Maintenance 11 12. Miscellaneous 11 Ladera Linda Park: Online Survey Results Ladera Linda Combined Survey Responses Survey respondents were asked to indicate whether they supported, didn't support or had no opinion about various possible components at Ladera Linda Park. The components that received C Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 33 the highest level of support were walking paths, an expanded nature center, athletic fields and a new community center. A chart of survey response is shown below. Below is a summary of open-ended survey questions regarding Ladera Linda Park. Clearly showing some direct correlation with responses to the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center responses, the most popular answers were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents advocated for new and enhanced community center, and improved park amenities, security and increased maintenance. Online Survey: Ladera Linda Survey Open Ended SUMMARY Supp art Don't Support No Opinion New community Center at J _g_U Linda 37.96% 27.31% 34.7336 Walking paths with fitness stations 65.4196 13.45% 21.15% Gymnasium 29.2746 38.24% 32.49% Additional Paddle tennis Courts (currently hvo) 17.65% 40,06% 42.3036 Tennis Courts [currently none] 35.01% 30.81% 34.17% Bocce Ball Court(s) 27.7396 29.69% 42.5536 Expanded Nature Center 51.5496 20,17% 28.29% Athletic Fields 47.2046 22.41% 30.39'96 Indoor Pool 32.9146 41.60% 25.4936 Outdoor Pool 33.75% 40.34% 25.91% Tricycle Park. for Tots 31.51% 30,81% 37.6596 Below is a summary of open-ended survey questions regarding Ladera Linda Park. Clearly showing some direct correlation with responses to the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center responses, the most popular answers were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents advocated for new and enhanced community center, and improved park amenities, security and increased maintenance. Online Survey: Ladera Linda Survey Open Ended SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 38 2. No skateboard park 2 3. Pro -Pool 16 4. No pool 4 5. Pro -Dog park 14 6. Sports Related 27 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 22 8. Equestrian 7 9. Community Center 5 10. Youth 11 11. Security Concerns 6 12. General Facility/Maintenance 15 13. Miscellaneous 6 Online Survey Open -Ended Questions The survey concluded with two open-ended questions. The first was "In your opinion what is the single most important thing the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department can do to improve the quality of life for its residents?" 474 people responded. The open-ended nature of the question generated a wide range of responses. Sixty people mentioned skate parks, the great majority in favor. Approximately fifteen responses were pro dog -park. The most 33 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 34 common response category with over 140 entries was open space/nature/trails responses with the majority expressing variants of maintaining and preserving open space and trails. There were also many requests for additional recreational amenities and programs for youth and seniors. Online Survey: Single Most Important Issue SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 60 2. No skateboard park 1 3. Pro -Pool 42 4. No pool 2 5. Pro -Dog park 16 6.Sports Related 32 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 149 8. Equestrian 5 9. Community Center/Facility Rentals 35 9. Seniors 15 10. Youth 14 11. General Facility/Maintenance 25 12. Parking Issues 26 13. Security Concerns 20 14. Miscellaneous 55 The last question of the survey allowed respondents to offer anything else they wished to share. Responses were similar to the previous question, but with a marked increase in responses opposed to Gateway Park and requesting that something be done to mitigate parking impacts in the Del Cerro neighborhood. Online Survey: Any Additional Response SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 28 2. No skateboard park 6 3. Pro -Pool 18 4. No pool 1 5. Pro -Dog Park 18 6. Sports Related 11 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 27 8. Equestrian 4 9. Community Center/Facility Rentals 21 10. Youth 4 11. Seniors 2 12. General Facility/Maintenance 21 13. Parking Issues 22 14. Security Concerns 6 15. Miscellaneous 32 34 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 35 Public Workshop Analysis Workshops were held about five parks sites (Eastview, Ladera Linda, Gateway, Upper Hesse Park, Point Vicente Park/Civic Center) two meetings were held per site, in addition to two general workshops. The results from these workshops are summarized below. Eastview Park Two public workshops were held regarding Eastview Park at Peck Park in San Pedro on November 5, 2014 and January 14, 2015. The most -discussed topic by far was a proposed fenced dog park. Attendees at the first workshop were fairly receptive to the idea and favored a plan that located it near the commercial shopping center on the western part of the park, away from the homes on the eastside of the park. Attendees at the second workshop were strongly opposed to the dog park. Elements that received support were shade structures, improved picnic area, and wide walking paths. Fitness stations received mixed reviews, while a dog park, allowing moon bounces and BBQs received the lowest level support. Many attendees reported incidents of dogs off leash. Concerns were raised about maintenance, feral cats, graffiti, and occasional vandalism. A consistent desire was expressed to maintain the park's low-key neighborhood feel. Below is a chart showing Eastview Workshop attendee responses. Eastview Park Public Workshop Exercise Results Shy Sttudures Fitness Statloru Picnk Areas Ch U P.er k e8as Vu" der Wakir. - Pa r F.;,. ■ Great Ilea It's OK ■ So So r No Gateway Park The two Gateway Park workshops which were held at Ladera Linda Park on December 3, 2014 and February 4, 2015 were the most well -attended and liveliest of all the public workshops. Approximately 80 people attended each workshop. A majority of speakers and attendees spoke out against the Gateway Park project. A number of attendees from the Del Cerro neighborhood spoke in favor of the project and expressed frustration at the traffic and congestion issues they were experiencing near the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve trailhead. While many Gateway 35 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 36 opponents were sympathetic to the Del Cerro issue, they raised a number of concerns about Gateway Park: Safety, particularly considering a drowning death and numerous rescues in July 2014 ➢ Access and traffic safety ➢ Neighborhood impact ➢ Social media and rising attendance at the Preserve and beaches ➢ Doubts regarding effectiveness in relieving Del Cerro congestion ➢ Questions about the availability of other parking lots ➢ Enforcement concerns ➢ Concerns that people would not utilize Gateway Park to access the Preserve, but would cross Palos Verdes Drive South to access nearby beaches Staff received a substantial number of emails regarding Gateway Park and Del Cerro Park. A spreadsheet of the emails is in the Public Outreach Appendix D. Below is a chart showing combined Gateway Workshop attendee responses. Gateways Park Public Workshop .Exercise Results 40 is 30 25 LE Picnic/ Sitting Areas Edurational Kiosks Staff/ Ranger Portable Emergency Response Parking Lot Tr@11er AcLe5s ■ Creat Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No Upper Hesse Park Two Upper Hesse Park workshops were held on December 10, 2014 and February 11, 2014. Both workshops featured an update on the Lower Hesse Park planning process, but the focus was on Upper Hesse Park. Attendees were most positive about adding shade structures, fitness stations, improved viewpoints, drought -resistant landscaping, and tricycle park for tots, 36 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 37 and replacing storage containers with a permanent solution. Attendees were mixed or negative about expanding the John C McTaggart Hall patio, and bocce ball courts. Concerns were raised about financing, management, traffic, views and adding recreation activities for youth teens and adults. There was a strong general consensus that no significant changes were needed. Below are charts showing combined Upper Hesse Park Workshop responses. Hesse Park Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results W Rol 15 1c a Shade Structure Fitness Stations Improved Expand McTaggart Drought Resistant Viewpoints Hall Patio Landscaping ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No Hesse Park Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 • - Tricycle Park For Bocce Ball Courts Enhanced Picnic Replace Storage Tots Tables & Benches Containers w/perm ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No 37 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 38 Attendees could also offer additional open-ended written comments. Below is a summary, comment details are in Appendix D. Hesse Park Comment Card SUMMARY # of comments 1. Add amenities and/or activities 28 2. Keep as Is 18 3. Maintenance Requested 7 4. Misc. 1 Ladera Linda Park Two Ladera Linda Park public workshops were held on November 12, 2014 and January 21, 2015. Approximately 20-25 people attended each workshop. Attendees had a strong positive response to a new community center with Sheriff/Park Ranger drop-in office and an expanded nature center. They expressed varying levels of support for maintaining the current multi -use lower field, improved amenities, paddle/tennis courts and adding fitness stations. Improvements to the existing paddle tennis courts were requested. There was strong opposition to a pool, gymnasium, dog park and BBQs at this park. Moderate opposition was also expressed regarding an ambulance station; although additional information is needed if this concept is to be explored further. Attendees expressed a desire to maintain a low-key neighborhood feel. Most attendees said their favorite activity was hiking or walking. Below are charts showing combined Ladera Linda Park Workshop responses. Ladera Linda Community Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exerclse Results 26 20 is 1 ■ ■■ ■ ■� ■ ■ ■ e E Greatidea It's OK 0 So So ■ No IL z CZ Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 39 Ladera Linda Community Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 40 35 30 2s 15 76 a Park Amenities New Community Dog Park Center NO Nature Center Gym ■ Great Edea It's OK ■ So So ■ NO I L Tricycle Course Local Ladera Linda Residents conducted their own survey on opinions about the size of a potential new community center, desired components, recreation facilities and other community issues. The results can be found in Appendix G. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Two Point Vicente Park/Civic Center public workshops were held on November 19, 2014 and January 28, 2015. Approximately 15-20 people attended each workshop. Many possible futures uses were discussed, along with the history of the site and the Open Space Task Force and Coast Vision plans. The components that received the strongest response were the skate park/skate plaza, improved park amenities, a pool, walking paths, and a village green. Ideas that received the least support were bocce ball courts, tennis/paddle tennis courts, a gym, arts cultural center and tricycle course. There was mixed support for playing fields. Concerns were raised about lighting and security, financing of projects, potential crowding of the site, long term maintenance and liability. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Community Center Public workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 25 20 15 NEI 10 0 Dog Park ChHdren's Skate Shade /BBOs Arts/Cultural Park/Skate / Picnic Center Plaza Tables ■ Great Idea E L 111 N NEI NEI Dog Park ChHdren's Gym Tricycle Playground Course for Tots It's OK ■ So So ■ No 39 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 40 Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 14 32 30 8 6 4 Walking Paths with Bocce Ball Courts Village Green w/ Tennis{Paddle Tennis Pool Multi-purpose playing Fitness Sations Amphitheatre Courts fields ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No General Workshops Two General PMPU workshops were held on February 18, 2015 at Ladera Linda Park and February 25, 2015 at Hesse Park. Staff presented an overview of the PMPU process and a review of all the prior workshops. Staff also presented information about all of the City's additional park sites and updates on current park design/planning efforts such as Lower Hesse Park and Lower Point Vicente. Input was very wide ranging at both workshops. Comments and concerns were expressed regarding a senior center, safety, security, Gateway Park, Del Cerro, the landslide area, passive vs. active uses, emergency supplies, an equestrian center, a new community center at Ladera Linda, and additional activities for youth and teenagers. There was a general sense that when it came to development, less was more. Below is a chart showing combined General Parks PMPU Workshop responses. General Master Plan Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results I 15 10 5 111 .1 1 1 1111 .I I a �■ ■ �I Outdoor Basketball Preserve:Adjacent Mew Conmunity Preserving Building Athletic Additional Paddle Preserve -Access Cou Its Nature Center Centeri-adera Undeveloped Land Recreation Tennis/Basketball Parkingat Gateovay Linda Facilities. Courts park ■ Great Idea It's SOK ■ So So ■ No Outdoor Baskethall Courts Preserve: Adjacent Nature Center Poe'. Community Center: Ladera Linda Preserving Undeveloped Land Building Athletic Recreation Facilities Additional Paddle Ten n is/Basketba l l Courts Preserve -access Parking at Gatevray park Great Idea It's OK so So No 3 12 3 15 3 1 15 2 5 24 O a B 13 5 B 4 3 1B 1 1 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 41 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The PMPU has eight appendices. Appendix A: 1989 Parks Master Plan Update Appendix B: 2005 Open Space Planning & Recreation and Parks Task Force Final Report Appendix C: Coast Vision Plan Report and Amendments (replaced by Coast Vision Plan Key Sites, Connections, and Design Guidance Sections: See Attachments) Appendix D. Comprehensive Public Outreach Results (Includes Public Workshop Summaries, Public Workshop Comment Cards, Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise results, Summary of emails received separated by subject, Complete Online Survey Results with summary of open-ended question responses. Appendix E Sport Fields/Facilities/Skate Park/Youth League Information Appendix F: Status/Update of 1989 Parks Master Plan Recommendations Appendix G: Ladera Linda Community Center Resident -Generated Questionaire Appendix H: Park Amenities CONCLUSION Much has changed since the Parks Master Plan was last updated in 1989, but much remains the same. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes' beautiful parks, magnificent open space, and endless vistas continue to be both a source of tremendous community pride and also a boundless avenue for a wide range of recreation possibilities. After a significant public outreach effort, this draft Parks Master Plan Update seeks to further that legacy by judiciously enhancing and maintaining our parks, maintaining the character of park -adjacent neighborhoods, and honoring the previous and ongoing contributions of innumerable dedicated residents, elected officials and staff. Attachments A - October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update Draft (page 43) B - Coast Vision Plan Key Sites, Connections, and Design Guidance Sections (replacing June 30, 2015 Appendix C) (page 124) C - June 24, 2015 Letter from JACO Builders Regarding Community Pool Partnership (page 161) D - Parks Master Plan -related Correspondence post June 30, 2015 (page 163) 41 Parks Master Plan Update Date: October 6, 2015 Page 42 E - Anti -Skate Park MoveOn.org Petition (page 232) F - Anti -Skate Park written petition (page 240) G - Pro -Skate Plaza MoveOn.org Petition (page 267) H - Pro -Community Pool Online Petition (page 275) I - Pro -Community Pool Written Petition (page 283) J - June 30, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update Late Correspondence (page 288) The June 30, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update Staff Report and Attachments (Item #2) were previously submitted under separate cover. MIA City of Rancho PaIlos Verdes Parks Master Plan Update Submitted October 6th, 2015 P�� Draft �'rd 43 PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE........................................................................................................................................... 3-4 B. BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 4-6 C. ACTION TAKEN SUBSEQUENT TO CITY COUNCIL MEEINTJUNE 30, 2015 6-7 D. PUBLIC OUTREACH PROCESS........................................................................................................ 7-24 E. RECREATIONAL GOALS/OBJECTIVES.......................................................................................... 24-26 SECTION II: PARKS AND OPEN SPACE A. PARKLAND STANDARDS AND CURRENT USAGE.......................................................................26-29 CITY RECREATIOANL STANDARDS..........................................................................................26 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS........................................................................................26-29 B. PARK INVENTORY........................................................................................................................ 30 1. PARK MAP............................................................................................................................ 31 2. PARK ACREAGE.................................................................................................................... 32 3. RECOMMENDATIONS & PRIORITIES............................................................................... 33-38 4. PARK SITES 39-78 A. ABALONE COVE................................................................................................... B. DEL CERRO PARK................................................................................................. C. DON C. WALLACE RADIO RANCHO MUSEUM PARK ............................................ D. EASTVIEW PARK.................................................................................................. E. FOUNDERS PARK................................................................................................. F. FRANK A. VANDERLIP PARK................................................................................ G. FRED HESSE JR. COMMUNITY PARK.................................................................... H. GATEWAY PARK.................................................................................................. I. LADERA LINDA PARK........................................................................................... J. LOWER POINT VICENTE...................................................................................... K. MARILYN RYAN SUNSET POINT PARK................................................................. L. MARTINGALE TRAILHEAD PARK.......................................................................... M. PELICAN POINT................................................................................................... N. POINT VICENTE PARK/CIVIC CENTER.................................................................. 0. ROBERT E. RYAN PARK........................................................................................ P. RPV BEACH.......................................................................................................... Q. VISTA CATALINA PARK........................................................................................ 5. RELATED PLANS A. PALOS VERDES NATURE PRESERVE & PUMP.................................................................79 B. TRAILS NETWORK PLAN UPDATE...................................................................................79 C. COAST VISION PLAN INCORPORATION..........................................................................80 SECTION 3 APPENDICES......................................................................................................................81 A. 1989 PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDATE................................................................................................................. B. 2005 OPEN SPACE PLANNING & RECREATION AND PARKS TASK FORCE REPORT ............................................ C. COAST VISION PLAN REPORT UPDATED........................................................................................................... D. COMPREHENSIVE PUBLIC OUTREACH RESULTS................................................................................................ E. SPORTS FIELDS/FACILITIES/SKATE PARK/YOUTH LEAGUE INFORMATION........................................................ F. STATUS UPDATE OF 1989 PARKS MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................... G. LADERA LINDA RESIDENT -GENERATED SURVEY................................................................................................ H. PARK AMENITIES............................................................................................................................................... October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 2 im I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose The purpose of the 2015 Parks Master Plan Update (PMPU) is to update the 1989 Parks Master Plan and to set forth a comprehensive strategy for addressing the future planning of the City's parks, recreation, and open space resources. The PMPU will function as a living document to help guide and respond to changes in the City's future park, open space and recreational needs. The PMPU presents updated information on each of the City's Park sites and identifies specific and general recommendations. The PMPU is not intended to be strictly binding to present and future City Councils and the City residents, but instead should function as a long range vision for providing recreation opportunities, with a flexible framework than can be adapted to changes in technology, demographics, economic realities, and recreational trends and preferences. Recommendations were informed and determined by a combination of factors including responses at twelve public workshops, City Council goals and direction, online survey results, recreation facilities and programs at neighboring cities, athletic leagues, input from other City Departments, emails and input from the public, and professional recreation expertise. Direction was also received and incorporated from a June 30, 2015 City Council Meeting where an earlier draft of this document was discussed. Much has been accomplished since the creation of the 1989 Parks Master Plan. In the 26 years since its adoption, numerous recreation goals and milestones have been achieved through the City's continuing dedication and commitment to providing a diverse and challenging recreation environment for the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes. The PMPU does not seek to re -invent the wheel, but instead combines and encapsulates the over quarter-century of achievements and effort that came before it. The PMPU is informed by existing City documents including: • City General Plan • The Coast Vision Plan • 1989 Parks Master Plan • Five Year Capital Improvement Program • Park Inventory While not adopted by the City Council, the extensive work, research, and recommendations generated by the Open Space Planning, and Recreation and Parks Task Force which met from 2002-2005 was considered as well. Recent and ongoing conceptual planning and public outreach/design efforts for sites and projects such as Grandview Park, Lower Hesse Park, Lower Point Vicente, and the Trails Network Plan Update are also key components of this plan. Rather than duplicate those efforts, the PMPU instead incorporates those recently completed and still -ongoing processes. Similarly, while the PMPU provides updated information about the majestic Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, which did not exist in 1989, it does not seek to duplicate the massive public outreach and planning process that went into that acquisition and is still ongoing. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 3 45 The PMPU includes the following components: 1. Background on Master Plan Procedure 2. Public Outreach Process 3. General Goals 4. Analysis of current recreation/parks usage 5. Master list of recommendations 6. Park Inventory including acquisition history, existing information, deed restrictions and possible recommendations 7. Joint Use Agreements/Partnerships/Leases 8. Status/Update of 1989 Master Plan Recommendations 9. Sports Field/Facilities Inventory B. Background The City's existing Parks Master Plan was adopted on October 17, 1989. Now 26 years old, the 1989 Plan was created by a 15 -member ad hoc committee established by the City Council. The committee, which divided itself into three five -member subcommittees each assigned to study a particular region of the City (Westside, Coastal and Eastside), worked over a six-month period to solicit input from the community in a variety of ways, including a citizen survey, public workshops, meetings with special interest groups, written correspondence, and contact with homeowners associations and individual residents. The resulting Plan contains an extensive list of policies, goals and recommendations regarding the park and recreational needs of the community at that time, as well as factual information and recommended improvements for each park site in the City. (Appendix A: 1989 Parks Master Plan and Appendix F: Status Update of 1989 Master Plan Recommendations) Since the 1989 Master Plan Update, the City has acquired several new park sites and significant open space areas, including the now 1,450 acre Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The most comprehensive previous attempt to update the Parks Master Plan occurred in 2002 when the City Council expanded the seven -member Recreation and Parks Committee into an eighteen -member Open Space Planning, and Recreation & Parks Task Force (Task Force). The Task Force, whose membership included a broad spectrum of interests concerning the recreation, parks and open space issues affecting the community, was charged with investigating all of the City's existing resources and unmet needs, and advising the City Council on updating the 1989 Parks Master Plan, including making recommendations for utilization of City parks and open space properties. The Task Force, which organized itself into eight subcommittees, eventually presented a strategic plan to the City Council in 2004. The plan, which included dozens of recommendations for park sites and an extensive set of recreation options for Upper Point Vicente in particular, was not adopted by City Council and the Task Force was officially dissolved in 2005. (Appendix B Open Space Planning and Recreation & Parks Task Force Report) More recently, the Coast Vision Plan (CVP) was adopted by the City Council on September 2, 2008. The CVP represented over two years of planning and an extensive public outreach effort to create an informational planning document for the City's coastal areas. The CVP includes the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve and five additional sites: Upper Point Vicente, Lower Point Vicente, Abalone Cove, Gateway, and Del Cerro. The CVP also addressed improvements and recommendations related to public access, interpretive materials, and October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 4 recreational amenities and facilities to improve the experience of the coast and open space areas for residents and visitors. While many of the CVP recommendations have not been significantly affected by developments since its adoption, several sites have been impacted by subsequent actions including the Annenberg Foundation's withdrawal of its proposed development project in 2011 and the Council's approval of including a skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center and the elimination of the Gateway Park parking lot proposal on June 30, 2015. (Appendix C: Coast Vision Plan w/ Amendments) The CVP was updated in 2012 to remove the Annenberg Proposal at Lower Point Vicente and again in 2015 to update the conceptual plan for Lower Point Vicente. The June 30, 2015 Staff Report stated that once the PMPU is adopted, the impacted elements of the CVP will also need to be updated. Staff is now recommending that the Coastal Vision Plan be replaced by the PMPU. This approach eliminates the possibility of overlapping and conflicting strategic documents. The five key park sties addressed in the Coast Vision Plan (Gateway, Del Cerro, Point Vicente Park/Civic Center, Abalone Cove, and Lower Point Vicente) are all included and updated in the PMPU. Section 5, "Design Guidance" will be incorporated into the draft PMPU. The Connections section of the CVP will be considered in the ongoing Trails Network Plan Update and is also included in the PMPU to help provide guidance for trail development and maintenance at City park and open space areas. Councilwoman Susan Brooks submitted a City Council Study Session report on May 20, 2014 recommending that staff provide an update to the 1989 Parks Master Plan. Her report stated that "This Plan would be presented to Council and the public for input and feedback regarding the future of our parks and their corresponding programs. This undertaking might require a large amount of staff time and resources, as various communities would be contacted for input and potential Town Hall meetings will likely occur." Subsequently at the July 29, 2014 City Council Meeting, the Council discussed a proposal for a skate plaza to potentially be located on the grounds of Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. The staff report noted that "while there is nothing in the 1989 Master Plan that specifically recommends or discourages a skate park, it is worth noting that the City Council recently directed Recreation staff to conduct a Master Plan update. This update will include Point Vicente Park. Council may wish to consider including SPV's (SkateparkPV) proposal as part of the master plan process." City Council provided updated direction to staff to complete an update of the City's 1989 Park Master Plan that would provide a comprehensive strategy for addressing the future use of the City's parks, recreation and open space resources. The update would consolidate plans that currently exist for a number of major park sites, while being consistent with the City's General Plan and other guiding documents. SkateparkPV's proposal for a skate plaza at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center would also be considered as part of the update effort. A draft Parks Master Plan was presented to the City Council on June 30, 2015. A number of residents speaking that evening noted concerns about trash, graffiti, crime, safety, and vandalism at City Parks, open space areas and facilities. The City Council formally approved the following motions: 1) Remove Gateway Park from the Parks Master Plan. 2) Incorporate the privately funded Skate Plaza into the Parks Master Plan, at Upper Point October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 5 47 Vicente Park, with staff directed to work with the Skate Park representatives. 3) Provided general direction acknowledging the concept of "less is more"; to approve modest improvements at Lower Hesse Park and Eastview Park and, to preserve the general character of the other parks; and, to maintain the character of the neighborhoods around the park facilities. 4) Direct staff to return with an analysis of a recommendation to create a full-time staff position to address trash pick-up and graffiti removal, with a budget adjustment if necessary; including a review of full and part-time staffing at park sites. C. Action Taken Subsequent to City Council June 30, 2015 Direction The Draft Parks Master Plan has been revised to reflect the direction provided by City Council on June 30, 2015. 1. The Gateway Park proposed plan has been removed. No improvements are suggested for that site. 2. The Skate Plaza is incorporated into the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center plan and staff is continuing to meet regularly with their representatives. 3. Staff reviewed the list of recommendations refined them to reflect the "less is more" directive. Particular attention was given to Lower Hesse Park (which is scheduled for the October 20, 2015 City Council meeting) and to Eastview Park. 4. Recommendations were reviewed in light of their potential impact on the existing character of the park in question and the impact on adjacent neighborhoods. The following is a list of enhanced park/Preserve staffing levels and graffiti/trash services established to better maintain and improve the quality and aesthetics of existing park sites, 1) Trash and Graffiti On July 21, 2015 the City Council approved a plan to expand trash collection in City parks from four days a week to seven days a week. Trash collection services was increased from four hours a day, Monday through Friday to eight hours a day seven days a week. Additionally, the City entered into a 24 hour graffiti removal agreement to remove all reported graffiti incidents within 24 hours. Staff and members of the public can report instances of graffiti to GPC using a smart phone app. Both the enhanced trash collection services and GPC are currently in operation. 2) Increased Park Staffing On August 4, 2015 the City Council approved a plan to expand Recreation part-time staffing presence to enhance park operations and maintenance, adding almost 10,000 part-time hours. _Expanded staffing will enhance the City's ability to pro -actively improve operations and better manage and maintain the City's existing park and open space resources. This preventative approach will help protect and maintain the City's popular recreation assets. Added staff will perform the following roles: picking up overflow and scattered trash throughout the park grounds, enforcing park rules, educating the public about appropriate use of parks and open space areas, curbing vandalism, increasing staffed park hours especially during peak hours of operation, and providing higher levels of responsiveness to public complaints and concerns. Eastview Park will now be staffed and roaming staff will visit October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 6 unstaffed parks such as Vanderlip, Grandview,and Del Cerro on a daily basis to perform inspections, enforce rules and complete work orders. The following chart shows the approved staffing increase: Park Staffing Increase Location/Purpose Hours Roaming Patrol 1,460 Eastview Park 3,650 Hesse Park 1,100 Abalone Cove 2,184 Ladera Linda Park 760 Robert Ryan Park 760 Sub -total 9,914 3) Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Staffing On Augusts 18, 2015 City Council approved establishing Recreation and Parks Department part-time staffing in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. Preserve staff will enhance the City's ability to pro -actively improve operations and better manage and maintain the City's existing open space resources. Preserve staff will function much in the same way that recreation staff do at our park sites. They will fill the need for a daily "boots -on -the -ground" presence in the Preserve, proactively assisting with preserve maintenance, establishing a high level of cleanliness, complementing the efforts of Public Works staff and contractors, interacting with the public, and enforcing Preserve rules. The need for a daily staff presence has been heightened by increased attendance at the Preserve, fueled in part by the growing role of social media. This preventative approach will help protect and maintain this beloved and much -used community resource by allowing staff to respond to situations immediately rather than have to submit a work order or report it to through the chain of command. 3,744 annual part-time hours were approved. Recreation and parks staff is currently recruiting and preparing training materials for Preserve staff with a goal of having this program operation by December, 2015. 4) Enforcement Enhancement On August 18, 2015 the Council also tasked staff with researching solutions to address concerns regarding enforcement in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. This issue is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on October 20, 2015. D. The Public Outreach Process A multi-level public outreach process was undertaken from October 2014 through March 2015 which included an online survey. Maximizing public awareness and involvement was a central component of a thoughtful and thorough Parks Master Plan Update. The public was notified of the PMPU and its various workshops by the following methods: • Mass mailing to all City residences in October 2014 • Updates on City's Website October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 7 • Creation of a Parks Master Plan Update City Webpage • Multiple Listsery messages • Multiple Notifications on Facebook and Nextdoor social media sites • Recreation Activity Guides • Public Banners • Press Releases • HOA Notifications • Mailings to residences adjacent to park sites discussed at workshops • Contacting stakeholders and interested parties The centerpieces of the public outreach effort were a series of twelve public workshops held from November, 2014 through February, 2015 and an online survey. Facilitated Public Workshops Facilitated public workshops were held from November 2014 through February 2015. The workshops were focused on particular park sites and were designed to obtain detailed feedback on current and possible uses at each location. Two workshops each were held for five park sites: Eastview, Ladera Linda Park, Point Vicente Park/Civic Center, Upper Hesse Park, and Gateway Park. The public workshop process concluded with two general workshops which covered the five focus parks sites as well as all other park sites and open space areas. All twelve workshops were held on Wednesday evenings, from 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm. Below is a list of the workshop locations and dates. Date Topic Location 1. Wed. Nov. 5 Eastview #1 Peck Park 2. Wed. Nov. 12 Ladera Linda #1 LL/MPR 3. Wed. Nov. 19 Pt. Vicente Park/Civic Ctr #1 CH/Comm Room 4. Wed. Dec. 3 Hesse Park #1 HP/McTaggart 5. Wed. Dec. 10 Gateway #1 LL/MPR 6. Wed. Jan. 14 Eastview #2 Peck Park 7. Wed. Jan. 21 Ladera Linda #2 LL/MPR 8. Wed. Jan. 28 Pt. Vicente Park/Civic Ctr #2 CH/Comm Room 9. Wed. Feb. 4 Gateway #2 LL/MPR 10. Wed. Feb. 11 Hesse Park #2 HP/McTaggart 11. Wed. Feb. 18 General Master Plan #1 LL/MPR 12. Wed. Feb. 25 General Master Plan #2 HP/McTaggart Online Survey While public workshops tend to attract people who live near to a particular site or have an interest in a particular recreation topic, a survey generates more general, community -wide responses to a series of recreation topics. The online survey, run through the website Survey Monkey, was approved by the City Council and was subsequently completed by 743 respondents from November 21, 2015 to its closing on March 15, 2015. Questions ranged from general attitudes about parks and open space topics to very specific questions about support for components at Ladera Linda Park and Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. This was not a professional or statistically valid survey, but its results did provide many insights. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 8 50 Review of Recent Public Workshops and Outreach Efforts Staff also utilized materials and feedback from recent public workshops and focus groups that examined a number of high-profile City areas and park sites including the Coastal Vision Plan, Grandview Park, Lower Hesse Park, and Lower Point Vicente Park. Outcomes of the Public Outreach Process The following findings and conclusions were developed from the results of the 2014-15 Parks Master Plan Update public outreach process (see the more complete Public Outreach Report in Appendix D which includes spreadsheets showing all emails received, complete online survey results including lists/charts of all individual comments from the online survey, lists of all individual comments from workshop comment cards, and all public workshop "tape dot exercises"). Specific park recommendations are discussed in the individual Park Sites section of this document. Online Survey Analysis 743 total responses were received from November 2014 through March 2015. 87% of respondents said they lived in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Responses were received from all sections of the City. 75% of respondents rated the the City's Recreation and Parks Department as either "great" or "good" on its ability to provide physical parks and facilities to the public. Sixty-two percent rated the Department as "great" or "good" on its ability to provide recreation programs, activities and events. Overall, how would you rate the City of Overall, how would you rate the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department in its ability to provide physical Department in its ability to provide physical parks and facilities to the public? Check parks and facilities to the public? Check the appropriate circle. the appropriate circle. 0.na-- -p-1 Great Goad Adequate Fair Xptmeehw eapectadona 0% loos 30% 30% 40% 50% 00% 70% q0% 9G% 100% Great Adequate Fair, Na[meedag espectatioas Respondents were asked to inidcate their general address by filling in their cross streets. The great majority of respondents were RPV residents. Below is a graphic represenation of RPV resident respondent locations. Larger bubbles indicate a higher numbe of respondents from particular cross streets. The lowest level of responses came from the eastern section of the City while the most responses came from the southern area near Ladera Linda and the northwest section of the City. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 9 51 CROSS STRE TS --_6.r TORRA'JC- L _ ,'ITA. PALOS VERDES ESTATES r * \ ROLLING HILLS ESTATES a � x ti ROLLING HILLS No. of (People LOS AN G EL E S 32.- 16-17 � 13-15 11-12 9-10 19 7-8 0 5-6 i 3-4 1-2 Miles 0 0.35 0.7 1.4 In order to get a sense of how survey respondents spend their leisure time, a number of recreation activities and options were presented. Respondents were asked to check all activities that they participated in on a monthly basis. Not surprisingly, given the City's emphasis on open space and trails, 87% of respondents selected "hiking, walking and jogging" which was by far the most popular choice. Other notable results include "Swimming" (29%), "Going to the beach" (56%), "Skateboarding" (22%), "Using a dog park " (29%), "Working Out at a Gym" (36%), "road biking" (19%). "picnicking or relaxing at a local park" (40%), "Tennis" (15%), "Participating in senior programs" (14%), and `Mountain biking" (11%). Team sports percentages range from 2.8% for lacrosse up to 18% for soccer. The combined team sports percentage is approximately 46%. While team sports are clearly popular, participation levels were higher for non -team, individual activities such as surfing (18%), skateboarding (22%), road biking (19%), mountain biking (11 %), horseback riding (8.4%) and golfing (16%). The variety of responses clearly demonstrates that survey respondents, the great majority of whom are RPV residents, participate in a wide range of sports and recreation activities. Below is the full list of activities that survey respondents or their families participated in on a monthly basis: October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 10 52 Puking. °r.,=-Iklnp c-,.. Laorc gee surnng . 1--n-met-ac k - met-3ck r1cllna Fu=,V eperAal... t-93ch _ SkatMoerding _ Miing a cicg Park won rKIng ort at 3 gyrrn ParGolpaG ng In *-Pnlc.-.. C#eng Road WI[ m PIEmIcIcing or rallaxing A ... Tensa I n Participating . In ark RPV-.. Atllerrrling an Fu=,V eperAal... MDuntalrr inaing _ Pleying baseball Playing soc.----sr ■ R yr ing e orfb3l l I oft P13y,izag r -M7 tb3l1 Playing arca I I ey G311 October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 11 53 Answer choices Responses 60 - Hiking, walking or jogging 8T.25% 623 Swimming 29.27% 209 - Lacrosse 2.80% 20 Surfing 18.77% 134 Horseback rung 8.40% 60 - %o -mg to the beach 56.30% 402 - Skateboarding 22.27% 159 - Using a dog park 29.55% 211 - Working out at a gym 36.69% 262 - Paiticipatinginaenimpmgrarns 14.57% 104 - ming 16.81% 120 Road biking 19.05% 136 Picnicking or relaxing at a local park 40.90% 29.2 Tennis 151.0% 113 - Pa ticiper ing in an RFV recreation program 4.62% 33 - Attending an Rlr Y special event 17.51% 1:25 - Mountain biking 11.49% 82 Playing baseball 7.42% 53 Playing soccer 18.49% Playing softball 4.06% __ Playing football 5.32% v = Playing volleyball 9.24% 66 -::-91 Respondents.: 714 The survey revealed moderate support for developing additional recreation elements such as playing fields and basketball or tennis courts (44% support/33% don't support) and greater support for building physical facilities such as a community center, gym, pool, or children's playground (52% support/30% don't support). October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 12 54 Development of additional playing fields and outdoor recreation elements such as basketball or tennis courts 81. Fport DDn,**putk 'I H— No Optnlan W d9% 50% 69% 30% ... .. . Building of physical recreation facilities such as a community center, gymnasium, pool or children's playground LnaderdC 717 eKiC* j2C Support t19ni sqpt H% NDIDpYi9n - 9`.6 19%- M% 3D% 49% 567 W% 747 W% 9M 1917% Public support for preserving undeveloped land for wildlife and natural habitat remains strong at 82% with only 7% not supporting. This high level of support for open space dovetails with the 87% of respondents who say they hike or walk on a monthly basis, as well as respondents who ride horses (8%) or go mountain biking (11 %). A significant portion of the survey focused on two sites: Ladera Linda Community Center and Point Vicente Park/Civic Center (City Hall). Point Vicente Park/Civic Center was selected because a large percentage of its flat, developable area is currently undeveloped and it has been the focus of previous planning processes including the Coast Vision Plan and Open Space Task Force efforts. Ladera Linda Community Center was selected because it has been identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan as being a candidate for renovation or demolition/rebuilding because of the poor condition of its buildings and infrastructure. More information about these two locations and suggested recommendations can be found in the individual Park Sites section of this report. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center: Online Survey Results Respondents were asked to indicate their support, lack of support, or no opinion on a range of possible site amenities. The elements that received the highest level of support were all relatively modest improvements, none of which included habitable buildings, such as walking paths with fitness stations, a children's playground, a permanent dog park, a village green, and an amphitheater. Athletic facilities such as a gymnasium, pool, tennis cours, or basketball courts received relatively close results with more oppostion than support. A skate park, which has been identified by Council as a potential element for this site, received almost identical scores of "support" and "don't support" . An arts/cultural center had slightly more oppostion than support. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 13 55 Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Online Survey Results ab. an.umc 30A p�ll II III 0y1 19 r ti ��.``+l 4�ayo` c afi ffi zeF 16 e Iia ■ Support Don't Support ■ No Opinion Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Combined Survey Responses The survey included an open-ended question allowing respondents to list anything not listed above "that you would like to see at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. 143 survey respondents answered this questions with 599 abstaining. Many respondents opted to list items that were included on the previous list of survey questions. Not surprisingly, there was a wide range of responses from disc golf to yoga. The topics that received the most positive responses were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports -related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents indicated that the there was no need for any changes. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in Appendix D. Online Survey: Point Vicente Survey Open Ended SUMMARY Support Don't Support No Opinion Building a multiple -sport gymnasium = 42.42% 4 Building an outdoor swimming pool 37.41% 43.53% 19.05% Adding more outdoor tennis or paddle tennis courts 29.07% 41.31% 29.62% Building a hand shell or amphitheater 55.08% 23.54% 21.28 Building a skate spark 42.56% 41,56% 15.58% Adding playing fields for soccer, baseball and other field sports 37.97% 35,.88% 26.15% Creating a village green With gardens and walkways 62.03% 36.97% 21% Providing a perma nent dog park 51.60% 30,74% 17.66% Building Walking paths with fitness Stations 67.45% 17.25% 1530% Building outdoor basketball courts 34.77% 35.47% 29.76% Building bocce hall courts 27.82% 35.61% 36.58% Building a children's playground 51.74% 23.6496 24.62% Building a tricycle park for tots 28.79% 40.7996 30.46% Building an arts/Cultural center 34.77% 38.39% 26.84% The survey included an open-ended question allowing respondents to list anything not listed above "that you would like to see at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. 143 survey respondents answered this questions with 599 abstaining. Many respondents opted to list items that were included on the previous list of survey questions. Not surprisingly, there was a wide range of responses from disc golf to yoga. The topics that received the most positive responses were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports -related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents indicated that the there was no need for any changes. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in Appendix D. Online Survey: Point Vicente Survey Open Ended SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 24 2. No skateboard park 4 3. Pro -Pool 9 4. Pro -Dog park 7 5. Sports Related 25 October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 14 56 6. Open Spaces/Trails Hiking/Nature/Gardens 29 7. Equestrian 2 8. Community Center/Youth Activities/ Facilit Rentals 15 9. Seniors 4 10. Youth 4 11. General Facility/Maintenance 11 12. Miscellaneous 11 Ladera Linda Park: Online Survey Results Respondents were also asked to indicate their support, lack of support, or no opinion on a range of possible site amenities at Ladera Linda Park. The elements that received the highest level of support were walking paths with fitness stations, expanded nature center, athletic fields, and a new community center. Athletic facilities such as a gymnasium, pool, tennis courts, or basketball courts again received relatively close results with more oppostion than support. There was significantly higher support for adding tennis courts rather than build additional paddle tennis courts. New Walking Gymnasium Additional Community paths with Paddle Center fitness Tenrns Ladera stations Courts Linda (currently two) ■ Support Ladera Linda Online Survey Results Tennis Bocce Ball Expanded Athletic Indoor Pool Outdoor Courts Courts Nature Fields Pool (currently Center none) Don't Support ■ No Opinion Tri cyc le Park for Tots October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 15 57 Ladera Linda Park Combined Survey Responses New conwnunity Center at LOM Linda Suppart 37.96% Don't Support 23.31% No Opinion Ir 34.73% Walking paths with fitness stations 65.41% 13.45% 21.15% Gymnasium 29.27% 38,24% 32.49'% Addltional Paddle tennis Courts (currently two) 17.65% dD.U6% 42.30% Tennis Courts (currently none) 35.01% 3D.81% 34.17% Bocce Ball Court(s) 27.73% 29.fig% 42.5836 Expanded Nature Center 51.5496 2117% 26.2936 Athletic Fields 47.20% 22.41% 30.39% Indoor Pool 32.91% 41.60% 25.49% Outdoor Pool 33.75% dD.34% 25.9116 Tricycle Park for Tots 31.51% 30.8196 37.68% The survey again included an open-ended question allowing respondents to list anything not listed above "that you would like to see at Ladera Linda Park". 168 survey respondents answered this questions with 575 respondents abstaining. Clearly showing some direct correlation with responses to the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center responses, the most popular answers were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents advocated for new and enhanced community center, and improved park amenities, security and maintenance. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in Appendix D. Online Survey: Ladera Linda Survey Open Ended SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 38 2. No skateboard park 2 3. Pro -Pool 16 4. No pool 4 5. Pro -Dog park 14 6. Sports Related 27 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 22 8. Equestrian 7 9. Community Center 5 10. Youth 11 11. Security Concerns 6 12. General Facility/Maintenance 15 13. Miscellaneous 6 The survey concluded with two open-ended questions. The first was "In your opinion what is the single most important thing the City of Rancho Palos Verdes' Recreation and Parks Department can do to improve the quality of life for its residents?" 474 people responded; 269 skipped this question. The open-ended nature of the question generated a wide range of responses. Sixty people mentioned skate parks, the great majority in favor. Approximately fifteen responses were pro dog -park. The most common response category with over 140 entries was open space/nature/trails responses with the majority expressing variants of maintaining and preserving open space and trails. There were also many requests for additional recreational amenities and programs for youth and seniors. Other popular topics addressed included parking and preserve access at Gateway Park and Del Cerro Park, and safety/security concerns, and to simply do nothing -no changes needed. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in Appendix D. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 16 92 Online Survey: Single Most Important Issue SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -skateboard park 60 2. No skateboard park 1 3. Pro -Pool 42 4. No pool 2 5. Pro -Dog park 16 6.Sports Related 32 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 149 8. Equestrian 5 9. Community Center/Facility Rentals 35 10. Seniors 15 11. Youth 14 12. General Facility/Maintenance 25 13. Parking Issues 26 14. Security Concerns 20 15. Miscellaneous 55 The last question of the survey allowed respondents to offer anything else they wished to share. Survey fatigue may have set in by this point because only 222 respondents answered with 521 respondents skipping this question. General response categories were similar to the previous question, but with a marked increase in responses opposed to Gateway Park and requesting that something be done to mitigate parking impacts in the Del Cerro neighborhood. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in the Appendix D. Online Survey: Any Additional Response SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 28 2. No skateboard park 6 3. Pro -Pool 18 4. No pool 1 5. Pro -Dog Park 18 6. Sports Related 11 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 27 8. Equestrian 4 9. Community Center/Facility Rentals 21 10. Youth 4 11. Seniors 2 12. General Facility/Maintenance 21 13. Parking Issues 22 14. Security Concerns 6 15. Miscellaneous 32 October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 17 59 Public Workshop Analysis Eastview Park Two public workshops were held regarding Eastview Park at Peck Park in San Pedro on November 5, 2014 and January 14, 2015. Approximately 10 people attended each session. Discussion was lively and wide-ranging. The most -discussed topic by far was a proposed fenced dog park. Attendees at the first workshop were fairly receptive to the idea and favored a plan that located it near the stores on the western part of the park away from the homes on the eastside of the park. Attendees at the second workshop were strongly opposed to the dog park. Elements that received support were shade structures, improved picnic area, and wide walking paths. Fitness stations received mixed reviews, while a dog park, allowing moon bounces and BBQs received the lowest level support. Many attendees reported incidents of dogs off leash. Concerns were raised about maintenance, feral cats, graffiti, and occasional vandalism. A consistent desire was expressed to maintain the park's low-key neighborhood feel. Below is a chart showing Eastview Workshop attendee responses. Eastview Park Public Workshop Exercise Results `,hadeStructures FlknessStatlons Picnic Areas UogPaA 8843 WWVWalseng Pauls ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No A comment card summary from the Eastview Workshops is in Appendix D. Gateway Park The two Gateway Park workshops which were held at Ladera Linda Park on December 3, 2014 and February 4, 2015 were the most well -attended and liveliest of all the public workshops. Approximately 80 people attended each workshop. A majority of speakers and attendees spoke out against the Gateway project. A number of attendees from the Del Cerro neighborhood spoke in favor of the project and expressed frustration at the traffic and congestion issues they were experiencing near the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve trailhead at the end of Crenshaw Boulevard. While many Gateway Park opponents were sympathetic to the Del Cerro issue, they raised a number of concerns about Gateway Park: y Safety, particularly following a drowning death and numerous rescues in July 2014 ➢ Access and traffic October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 18 it ➢ Neighborhood impact Social media and rising attendance at the Preserve and beaches ➢ Doubts about the effectiveness in relieving Del Cerro congestion ➢ Questions about the availability of other parking lots Enforcement concerns y Concerns that people would not utilize Gateway Park to access Preserve, but would cross Palos Verdes Dr Drive South to access nearby beaches Staff received a substantial number of emails regarding Gateway Park and Del Cerro Park. A spreadsheet of the emails is in the Public Outreach in Appendix D. Below is a chart showing combined Gateway Workshop responses. 40 IS 30 25 M LE LO a � Picnic/ Sitting Arta Gateway Park Fluhllr Workshop Exercise Results 1.0 Educational Kiosks Staff/ Ranger Portable Emergency Response Trail er Af r•r s5 0 Great Idea It's OK ■ So So 0 No A comment card summary from the Gateway workshops is in Appendix D. Upper Hesse Park 1 marking Lot Two Upper Hesse Park workshops were held on December 10, 2014 and February 11, 2014. Approximately 15-20 people attended each workshop. Both workshops featured an update on the Lower Hesse Park planning process, but the focus was on Upper Hesse Park. Attendees were most positive about adding shade structures, fitness stations, improved viewpoints, drought -resistant amenities, and tricycle park for tots, and replacing storage containers with a permanent solution. Attendees were mixed or negative about expanding the John C. McTaggart Hall patio, or adding bocce ball courts. Concerns were raised about financing, management, traffic, views and adding recreation activities for youth teens and adults. There was a strong general consensus that no significant changes were needed. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 19 a• Below are charts showing combined Upper Hesse Park Workshop responses. Masse Park Public Workshop Tarps D-ot Exercise Results m 70 S Shade Stnvrture Fitness Stats Improved Expaild iNkya ggart Crought Ruta nt uLewpoinks "an pato Landsrap nA ■ Great Idea ft's OK ■ So So ■ No is A r TricVcb Rank inn Liaceae Ball Cruris. i nhancnd ftcnik OpLice Uora,ga Tats TaWeb & Benches Cantaiinem _/pyran ■ Great idea It's OK ■ So So ■ 'No A comment card summary from the Upper Hesse Park Workshops is in Appendix D. Ladera Linda Park Two Ladera Linda Park public workshops were held on November 12, 2014 and January 21, 2015. Approximately 20-25 people attended each workshop. Attendees had a strong positive response to a new community center with Sheriff/Park Ranger drop-in office and an expanded nature center. They expressed varying levels of support for maintaining the current multi -use lower field, improved amenities, paddle/tennis courts and adding fitness stations. Improvements to the existing paddle tennis courts were requested. There was strong opposition to a pool, gymnasium, dog park and BBQs. Attendees expressed a desire to maintain a low-key neighborhood feel. Most attendees said their favorite activity was hiking or walking. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 20 Z A "A' Wr A A ..�r �� --a. of . Z."f, � ' �+[ � X, Below are charts showing combined Ladera Linda Park Workshop responses. Ladera Linda Community Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 40 is 30 A M is 1 Rb AP ■ Great Idea It's GK N So So ■ No Ladera Linda Camrnunity Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 40 35 30 2S M is io d , ■ 1�. Park Amertltles New Cornmunity Dog Park future Center Gym Tricycle Course Center ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 21 2 • A comment card summary from the Ladera Linda Park Workshops is in Appendix D. Local Ladera Linda residents conducted their own informal survey on opinions about the size of a potential new community center, possible community center components, recreation facilities and other community issues. The results can be found in Appendix G. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Two Point Vicente Park/Civic Center public workshops were held on November 19, 2014 and January 28, 2015. Approximately 15-20 people attended each workshop. Many possible futures uses were discussed along with the history of the site and the work of the Open Space Task Force and Coast Vision Plan. The components that received the strongest support were the skate park/skate plaza, improved park amenities, a pool, walking paths, and a village green. Ideas that received the least support were bocce ball courts, tennis/paddle tennis courts, a gym, arts/cultural center and tricycle course. There was mixed support for playing fields. Concerns were raised about lighting and security, financing of projects, potential crowding of the site, long term maintenance costs and liability. Below are charts showing combined Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Workshop responses. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Community Center Public workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 25 20 15 10 5 I L n Skate Shade /BBCs Arts/Cultural Dag Park Children's Gym Tricycle Park/Skate / Picnic Center Playground Coursefor Plaza Tables Tots ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 22 Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 14 i2 10 Great Idea It's GK So So No Skate Park/Skate Plaza 20 0 2._., Shade /BBQs / Picnic Tables 19 4 0 Arts/Cultural Center 1 S 1 Dog Park 2 6 10 Children's Playground 3 5 7 Gym 4 2 2 Tricycle Cnurse for Tots ® 3 11 Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 14 i2 10 6 6 4 Walking Paths with Bocce Ball Courts Village Green wJ Tennis/Paddle Tennis Pool Multi-purpose Playing Fitness Sations Amphitheatre Courts fields ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No Great Idea It's LK Sc Sc No Walking Paths w/ Fitness Staticin 9 7 1 fr -r Bocce Ball Cc u rts 3 2 2 13 Village Green w/Arnphitheatre 7 3 2 2 Tennis/Paddle Tennis Courts 0 3 3 10 Pnvl 4 31 M34ulti-pttrpose Playing fields 4&0 5 1 1 A comment card summary from the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Workshops is in Appendix D. General Workshops Two General PMPU workshops were held on February 18, 2015 at Ladera Linda Park and February 25, 2015 at Hesse Park. Staff presented an overview of the PMPU process and a review of all the prior workshops. Staff also presented information about all of the City's additional park sites and updates on current park design/planning efforts such as Lower Hesse Park and Lower Point Vicente Park. Input was very wide ranging at both workshops. Comments and concerns were expressed regarding a senior center, safety, security, Gateway Park, Del Cerro Park, landslide area, passive vs. active uses, emergency supplies, an equestrian center, a new community center at Ladera Linda, and additional activities for youth and teenagers. There was a general sense that when it came to development, that less was more. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 23 65 Below are charts showing combined General Parks PMPU Workshop responses. General Master Plan Public Workshop Tape Clot Exercise Results 30 25 20 15 10 5 a ■ ■ _■ Outdoor Basketball Preserve: Adjacent New Community Courts Nature Center Center.Ladera Linda ■ Great Idea Great Idea Outdone Basketball Courts Preserve: Adjacent Nature Center New Community Center: Ladera Linda Preserving Undeveloped Land Build"ang Athletic Recreation Facilities Additional Pad dleTen nisfBasketbaII Courts Preserve access Parking at Gateway park . I 1. _■ Presen.ing Building Athletic Additional Paddle Preserve -Access Undeveloped Land Recreation Tennis/Basketball Parking at Gateway Facilities Courts park It's OK ■ So So ■ No It's OK So So No 12 3 2 0 13 4 1 A comment card summary from the General Park Workshops is in Appendix D. E. Recreational Goals/Objectives In addition to input from the public via the online survey, public workshops and emails, City recreation standards, City goals, General Plan Land designations, Open Space and Recreational Resource policies, and existing partnerships are all significant determining factors in the PMPU's recommendations. City Council Goals for 2015-16 are still being finalized and the General Plan Update is currently being reviewed by the Planning Commission. Open Space and Recreational Resources Policies (excerpted from City's General Plan/Conservation and Open Space Element) • Provide Appropriate Access to public land • Promote and/or sponsor recreation programs within the City • Encourage local. Public, non-profit recreational and cultural activities. • Seek County, State, Federal and private funds to acquire, improve and maintain recreational lands. • Work through the State and Federal government in support of legislation October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 24 Me resulting in City acquisition of land. • Encourage institutions to provide public use of their recreation facilities • Encourage the building of playing fields, where appropriate, for multiple uses by various recreational groups. Citv Council Goals The City Council sets annual goals. Below are Parks and Recreation -related 2014 goals. Note: 2015 City Council and Management goals were still being determined at the time of this report. 2014 City Council Goals: • City Trails Enhancement: Complete Trails Network Plan Update (still pending) • Implementation of on-line access to recreation programs and space rentals: Complete "go -live" for Active.net (completed) • Continue with shared use of PVPUSD and City Facilities: City recreation programs to be available at Peninsula High pool and Miraleste Intermediate gym (completed -shared use at both locations scheduled for Summer 2015) • Continue with evaluation of City recreation programs/sustainability of/demand for programs (completed although staff continues to analyze the comparison of privatized rentals, independent contractors and in-house services. Staff continues to research surrounding jurisdictions to stay current on comparative services and fees) Joint Use Agreements The Recreation and Parks Department has developed a number of partnerships, ongoing relationships, and joint -use agreements with agencies that have expanded and enhanced the recreational opportunities available to City residents and visitors. Below is a partial list: • Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority: Park Ranger Services and Junior Ranger Program • Los Serenos de Point Vicente: Docent and Junior Docent Program -museum tours and guided nature walks. • Youth Sports Leagues including AYSO, Little Leagues, US Youth Volleyball League, Pony League, Lacrosse, etc. • Palos Verdes Unified School District: Use of Miraleste Gym and Peninsula High School Pool • Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy: Assist with management of Palos Verdes Nature Preserve • County Lifeguards • Peninsula Seniors: Driver Safety Courses, Weekly Lecture Series, Mah Jong Classes, Bridge Classes • Portuguese Bend Nursery School: Use of elementary school site • PV Archery Club • Trump National Golf Club: Assistance with management of Founders Park rentals • Palos Verdes Library District: Toddler Reading Enrichment Programs, Pop -Up Library October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 25 67 • YMCA: Joint Programming Opportunities • LA County Animal Care and Control Department: Pet Adoption and Pet Licensing, Vaccination and Microchip services II. PARKS and OPEN SPACE In this section, each of the City's park, recreation, and open space resources has been cataloged with acquisition information, a description of the property, the improvements that exist today, deed restrictions affecting the property, and potential recommendations. A. Parkland Standards and Current Usage 1. Parkland Standards City Recreational Standards When the City was incorporated in 1973, it had one municipal park, Ryan Park (formerly known as Rancho Palos Verdes Park). The City's General Plan and the City's Municipal Code (Section 16.20.100c) require four acres of parkland per thousand residents. The General Plan states that the City will "establish ordinances to require builders and developers to provide lands and/or funds for acquisition and development of land for recreational use" and that these lands and/or funds shall "be based on a standard of providing 4 acres of local parkland per 1000 population (City of Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan, page 99)." With a population of 41,643 (2010 U.S. Census), this park acreage standard yields a goal of approximately 165 acres for the City. The City's current park acreage of 278 acres (not including 1,450 acres of open space in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve) far exceeds this goal. General Plan Designations The State of California requires a Land Use Element to be included in every local government general plan. According to the State's General Plan Guidelines, the Land Use Element shall designate the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land for housing, business, industry, open space, including agriculture, natural resources, recreation, enjoyment of scenic beauty, education, public buildings and grounds, solid and liquid waste disposal facilities, and other categories of public and private uses of land. The City's General Plan is currently being updated and is scheduled for adoption on January 19, 2016. Any changes to the General Plan that have a significant bearing or impact on the PMPU will be incorporated. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 26 09 Below are existing land -use designations and proposed land -use designations. Definitions of land use designations are shown below. Park Abalone Cove Shoreline Land Use R -P ProposedExisting Use R-P/OSP Clovercliff R2-4 R -P Deane Dana Friendship R -P no change Del Cerro R -P no change Don C Wallace Radio Ranch R2-4 no change Eastview R R -P Founders R151 R -P Frank A Vanderlip R<_1 R -P Fred Hesse Jr R -A no change Gateway Park A/H/R151 R -P Grandview R -P no change Ladera Linda (City -owned) I -E I -P Ladera Linda (School Dist -owned) I -E no change Los Verdes Golf Course R -A no change Marilyn Ryan R:51 R -P Martingale R1-2 R -P Pelican Cove R -P R-P/OSP PVIC R-P/H R-P/OSP Upper Pt Vicente/Civic Center R-P/I-P R-P/I-P/OSP Lower Pt Vicente R -P R-P/OSP Shoreline Park R -P OSP Robert E Ryan R -A no change Vista Catalina R:51 R -P A Agricultural H Natural Environment/Hazard I -P Institutional public RP -OSP Open Space Preserve (new land use designation being proposed, currently does not exist) R:51 Residential equal to or less than 1 dwelling unit per acre R1-2 Residential 1 to 2 dwelling unit per acre R2-4 Residential 2 to 4 dwelling unit per acre R -A Recreational active R -P Recreational passive R Recreational (no active or passive distinction) October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 27 Below is the current 1975 General Plan Land Use Map. natural environment/hazard = hazard areas urban errvironment residential 151 d.u./5 acres s 1 du./acre 1-2 d.u./acre 2-4 du./acre 4-6 d u./acre 6-12 d_u_/acre 12-22 d u./acre commercial retail office recreational recreational active passive Institutional \. ®educational public -- religious agricultural r 0 agriculture industrial [=3 scientific research infrastructure facility arterial collector control districts urban socio -cultural natural specific plan ® specific plan district rancho pallos verdes October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 28 70 Below is the proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Map (currently still being reviewed by the Planning Commission). Once the Planning Commission completes its review, the next step is a Public Hearing wherein the City Council would be responsible for making the final decision on any changes to the General Plan. MCK" � Lmq �' Prat z a C e an Lomita 3an FeJ-- Land Use Designations J1II11ILLFECUESTRIAN CVERLA'" i11 OVERLAY DISTRICTS p'. NATURAL DESIGN. OC -1 SOOIO-CULTURAL. CC -2 URBAN DESIGN, OC3 ._. NATURAL & URBAN DESIGN, OC -1 & CC -3 Q AUTOMOTIVE, CC -4 L._ MIRA VISTA. OC -5 (DRAFT) LAND USES RES',DE NTIAL, 1-2I OPEN SPACE ® HAZARD =OPEN SPACE PRESERVE OPEN SPACE, HAZARD OPEN SPACE, N ILLSIDE 0 RESIDENTIAL, -1 DU,5 ACRE Q RESIDENTIAL, - 1 DUTACRE Q RESIDENTLAL, 1-2 DUTACRE RESIDENTAL, 24 DUTAC.RE Q RESIDENTIAL, 46 DUTACRE RESIDENTLAL, &12 DU•'AC �- RESIDENTLAL, 12,22 DU: A : F' E 0 AGRICULTURAL CEMETERY COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL =COMMERCIAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL - OFFICE Q INFRASTRUCTURE - FACILITY INSTITUTIONAL- EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL- PUBLIC Q INSTITUTIONAL- RELIGIOUS RECREATIONAL -ACTIVE RECREATIONAL- PASSIVE sW«: City ai Un he Palm VWdm October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 29 71 ,p rhlHl4kIIPP1Al11 '- 17il�liRHPM,n IIPIIPIIIIR I o'ra FI CE � Palas Verdes Esbt- AI b i Di' Wb °Bc OC -4 I - A Rolling Hills 1'.�. 1411 IHHP�Il4,N MCK" � Lmq �' Prat z a C e an Lomita 3an FeJ-- Land Use Designations J1II11ILLFECUESTRIAN CVERLA'" i11 OVERLAY DISTRICTS p'. NATURAL DESIGN. OC -1 SOOIO-CULTURAL. CC -2 URBAN DESIGN, OC3 ._. NATURAL & URBAN DESIGN, OC -1 & CC -3 Q AUTOMOTIVE, CC -4 L._ MIRA VISTA. OC -5 (DRAFT) LAND USES RES',DE NTIAL, 1-2I OPEN SPACE ® HAZARD =OPEN SPACE PRESERVE OPEN SPACE, HAZARD OPEN SPACE, N ILLSIDE 0 RESIDENTIAL, -1 DU,5 ACRE Q RESIDENTIAL, - 1 DUTACRE Q RESIDENTLAL, 1-2 DUTACRE RESIDENTAL, 24 DUTAC.RE Q RESIDENTIAL, 46 DUTACRE RESIDENTLAL, &12 DU•'AC �- RESIDENTLAL, 12,22 DU: A : F' E 0 AGRICULTURAL CEMETERY COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL =COMMERCIAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL - OFFICE Q INFRASTRUCTURE - FACILITY INSTITUTIONAL- EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL- PUBLIC Q INSTITUTIONAL- RELIGIOUS RECREATIONAL -ACTIVE RECREATIONAL- PASSIVE sW«: City ai Un he Palm VWdm October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 29 71 B. Parks Inventory and Recommendations 1. Park Map 2. Park Acreage 3. Priorities 4. Recommendations 5. Abalone Cove Shoreline Park 6. Clovercliff Park 7. Del Cerro Park 8. Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park 9. Eastview Park 10. Founders Park 11. Frank A. Vanderlip Sr. Park 12. Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park 13. Grandview Park 14. Gateway Park 15. Ladera Linda Park 16. Lower Point Vicente Park 17. Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park 18. Martingale Trailhead Park 19. Pelican Point 20. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center 21. Robert E. Ryan Park 22. RPV Beach 23. Vista Catalina Park Trails and Open Space 1. Preserve Map 2. Palos Verdes Nature Preserve/PUMP 3. Trails Network Plan Update October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 30 72 Map of Rancho Palos Verdes Park Sites October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 31 73 City of RPV Park Acreage 2015 Park # of Acres Abalone Cove Shoreline Park 76.4 Clovercliff Park 0.17 Del Cerro Park 4.5 Eastview Park 9.9 Founders Park 5.5 Fred Hesse Community Park 29.4 Grandview Park 17 Ladera Linda Community Park 11 Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park 1.5 Martingale Trailhead Park 1.2 Pelican Cove 10.5 Point Vicente Interpretive Center 28 Point Vicente Park and Civic Center 71 Rancho Palos Verdes Beach 1 Robert Ryan Community Park 11 Vista Catalina Park 0.2 Frank A. Vanderlip Sr. Park 0.48 TOTAL PARK ACREAGE 278.75 October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 32 74 RECOMMENDATIONS & PRIORITIES The Parks Master Plan Update has a long list of recommendations on a site by site basis that are phased in over 1-2 years, 3-5 years, and time periods to be determined. Some of the recommendations are already budgeted for or included in the funded or unfunded Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Some smaller projects, such as improvements to general park amenities at all park sites or a shift to drought tolerant landscaping where feasible can be accommodated with existing funds within the Public Works budget. If approved, staff will pursue alternative funding, including grants for unfunded projects. These dollar figures are estimates and may change as projects are further developed and scoped. Given today's challenging economic times, the City will need to deploy its financial resources carefully and thoughtfully to address the identified needs in a cost-effective way. Priorities 1. Adopt a "less is more" approach to future park planning and preserve the general character of existing parks. 2. Identify and apply methods to better protect and maintain existing parks and open space resources. 3. Be sensitive to potential impacts on part -adjacent neighborhoods. 4. Complete design process/phasing for Lower Hesse Park 5. Approve Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project expanded/enhanced indoor improvements. 6. Continue to address Preserve parking and neighborhood impact issues at Del Cerro Park and adjacent neighborhoods. 7. Confirm the desired components for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center and initiate Master Plan Process. 8. Approve a facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for development of new Ladera Linda Park Community Center 9. Transition to drought -resistant landscaping where feasible. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 33 75 PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 34 76 Phasing All Parks Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Improve Amenities: Benches, tables, trash/recycling (Park Public Works To be included System -wide project) in future CIP Costs spread per park site $190,000 $140,000 na X X Transition to drought - tolerant landscaping when Public works feasible (Park System- To be included Wide Project) $300,000 $200,000 na in future CIP X X Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Abalone Cove Beach Access Road Improvements $100,000 $100,000 FY 16-17 CIP Reserve X Improve site amenities, site -appropriate signage, benches, and picnic tables. $15,000 $10,000 no TBD X Clovercliff Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Improve Amenities: Benches, tables, trash/recyclingtrash/recycling cans $5,000 $3,000 no TBD X Del Cerro Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Improve Amenties: Add picnic tables and benches $15,000 $10,000 No TBD X Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Approach HOA to consider shift to drought tolerant planting to reduce or replace the size of the existing grass field TBD na no TBD X Eastview Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD FY 15-16 PW Build Dog Park $50,000 $50,000 na Budget X Install temporary staff office annual rental $15,000 $10,000 na R&P X Improve Amenities: Benches, tables, trash/recycling cans $15,000 $10,000 na TBD X Improved/widen walking paths $30,000 $25,000 na TBD X October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 34 76 Founders Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Continue ongoing relationship with Trump National staff to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility no cost na na n/a ongoing Improve Amenities: Benches, tables, trash/recyclingtrash/recycling cans $15,000 $10,000 na TBD X Frank A. Vanderlip Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Improve Amenities: Benches, tables, trash/recylcing cans $10,000 $5,000 na TBD X Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park/Upper Hesse Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Install fitness stations along walking paths $50,000 $35,000 na TBD X Upgrade existing amenities: picnic tables, benches, trash/recycling $25,000 $20,000 na TBD X Energy Install solar power system $385,000 $385,000 16-17 Savings Grant X Replace Fencing on Northern Border of Property (Upper and Lower) $169,000 $127,000 na TBD X Design and install stabilizing viewpoint at edge of western lawn. Include benches $20,000 $15,000 na TBD X Replace current railroad tie stairs with concrete stairs (Est. includes Ladera Linda) $180,000 $140,000 Unfunded TBD X Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park/Lower Hesse Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Incorporate results of Lower Hesse Park Project once completed. Scheduled to be considered by Council on October 20, 2015. na na na na Phase 1 $500,000 $500,000 na 15-16 CIP X Future Phases TBD na na TBD X Gateway Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD None: na na Grandview Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 35 77 Sycamore Option $635,000 $635,000 18-19 CIP Reserve X Initiate Facilitated design/pubic outreach/phasing process for remaining elements of Grandview plan including activity lawn, viewing nodes, discovery area, flexible cycling area and walking trails TBD na TBD X Ladera Linda Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Develop facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for development of new Ladera Linda Park 15-16 PW Community Center. $80,000 $100,000 na Budget X Upon completion of Ladera Linda Master Plan Process, proceed with demolition of existing CIP Reserve buildings and construction $4,00,000 in of new community center. $7,200,000 $7,200,000 18-19 FY 18-19 X Incorporate expanded Nature Center/Preserve Annex see above na na na X Incorporate Sheriff/Ranger Drop-in Office see above na na na X Pave access road between lower and middle parking lots TBD na na TBD X Improve landscaping around existing multi -use playing field* TBD na na TBD X Upgrade surfacing of current asphalt play area* TBD na na TBD X Keep two basketball courts* TBD na na TBD X Install interior paddle tennis fencing $10,000 $10,000 na TBD X Replace current railroad tie stairs with concrete stairs (Hesse, also)"Cost included in Hesse Park estimate Unfunded TBD X *Above costs to be developed during Ladera Linda Parks Master Plan Process as size, scale and quantities of amenities are determined na na na na na na na Lower Point Vicente Park/Point Vicente Interpretive Center Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Implement Lower Point Vicente Park Improvement Project $2,400,000 $2,400,000 Unfunded CIP X October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 36 19 Incorporate Phase 2 interior Exhibits upgrade into Master Plan once outreach process is Restricted complete $455,000 $455,000 15-16 Donor Fund X Install solar power system Energy on PVIC bldg $410,000 $410,000 17-18 Savings Grant X Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Continue to maintain positive working relationship with Trump National to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility of park. no cost na na n/a ongoing Martingale Trailhead Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Upgrade existing amenities including water fountain and signage $10,000 $8,000 na TBD X Pelican Cove Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Upgrade existing amenities $50,000 $40,000 na TBD X Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Authorize a facilitated Master Plan Design/Cost Benefit Analysis and Public Outreach Process for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center $250,000 $200,000 na TBD X Direct staff to pursue a formal "swap" of the 6.6 acre active recreation parcel with the National Park Service no cost na na X Incorporate results of Public Works Corporation Storage Yard Relocation process. $300,000 $300,000 na 15-16 budget X Private Fundraising by Non-profit Skate Plaza $850,000 $850,000 Unfunded group X Civic Center Tennis Court $100,000 $100,000 na CIP Reserve X Community Center $8,000,000 $3,000,000 Unfunded X October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 37 79 Include the following components be considered as part of the in the Point Vicente Park Master Plan Process: City Hall Community Center Skate Park/Plaza Outdoor Swimming Pool Shade Structures Children's Playground Walking paths w/fitness Cost estimates to stations be developed Enhanced amenities: during Point Picnic Tables, benches, Vicente Park trash/recycling cans/BBQs Master Plan Improved Village Green Process as size, Tennis Courts scale and quantities of Permanent Dog Park amenities are identified. na na TBD X Rancho Palos Verdes Beach Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD No changes to this site Robert E. Ryan Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Remodel or build new community building. $1,000,000 $250,000 na TBD X Enhanced amenities: Picnic Tables, benches, trash/recycling cans/BBQs $30,000 $20,000 na TBD X Vista Catalina Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Max.. Cost Min. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Continue to work with Trump staff to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility na na na na ongoing Max.. Cost Min. Cost TOTALS $23,729,000 $17,658,000 October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 38 rirr OF MUM PALOS WR`bCC PAm Vsim Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Abalone Cove Shoreline Park ADDRESS 5970 Palos Verdes Drive South PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7572-018-900 6/14/1988 7573-007-900 6/14/1988 7572-019-900 6/14/1988 7572-019-902 Archery 1/13/87 Range 7572-019-901 6/14/1988 ACQUISITION COST $1,060,00 ACREAGE 124.31 total acres Ab. Cove 79.16 acres Archery 45.15 acres SOURCE OF FUNDING/ACQUISITION INFORMATION The City of Rancho Palos Verdes Redevelopment Agency acquired Abalone Cove Shoreline Park from the County of Los Angeles on November 10, 1987. The property was obtained as a result of the Horan Lawsuit settlement. The Horan Agreement provided that the City would pay the County $1,060,000. Half of the payment was made to the County at the time of execution of the transfer agreement. The second payment was to be waived by the County on a dollar -for -dollar basis for each dollar diverted by the Agency for assessments securing the bonds or any other debt instruments for the stabilization work. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes Redevelopment Agency acquired the Archery Range from Transamerica Development Company (former owner of the Portuguese Bend Beach Club) on January 13, 1987. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION Various improvements have been made to the park which includes two beaches (Abalone Cove and Sacred Cove), tide pools, bluff top viewing areas and trails. The park contains a State Ecological Preserve and taking of protected animals and marine life is prohibited. There is direct access to a parking lot. To access Sacred Cove, users must walk along Palos Verdes Drive South to one of two trails between Portuguese and Inspiration Points. The site also includes a 45 acre parcel that features an archery range. The Archery Range is 45.15 acres in size. In 1990, the City granted Conditional Use Permit No. 152 and Coastal Permit No. 84 to the South Bay Archery Club to use the property on a temporary basis as an outdoor roving archery range. This use had been displaced from its previous location on the north side of Palos Verdes Drive South when the City substantially re -graded this area as part of a landslide abatement project in 1986. The Archery Club has made minimal improvements to the property in conjunction with the CUP, including the placement of targets, warning signage, benches and small shade structures. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 39 70.8 acres of the 79.16 acre property (excluding the upper and lower parking lots, upper picnic area and pre-school/lifeguard area) are part of the Abalone Cove Ecological Reserve. Improvements to the parking lot, building and upper area,including the installation of a parking arm, were completed in 2014 as part of the Abalone Cove Parking Lot Improvements Project. The Abalone Cove Shoreline Improvements Project in 2014 included enhanced and added park pathways, viewing areas, interpretive signage, public gathering space, upgraded and additional benches and picnic tables, and a shelter. RESTRICTIONS The County of Los Angeles acquired the land from private owners in 1975 for the specific purpose of providing a public beach. Federal Land and Water Conservation Funds were utilized for acquisition and development. Additionally, an Ecological Reserve was placed on a portion of the park in a license agreement with the County of Los Angeles and a lease agreement with the State Lands Commission. PRIOR RECOMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Installation of safety railing on the bluff tops above Abalone Cove and around Portuguese Point, construction of twenty picnic pads (5 handicap accessible) entry sign and landscaping, entry building with office restrooms and storage facilities, enlargement of parking lot by 70 spaces. Pave paths from the parking lot accessing the picnic tables along the bluff. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Re -sodding of the upper levels of the site with natural grasses that require no irrigation. Improving beach access by upgrading the access paths. Upgrading the lower beach area buildings, including the restrooms and outdoor shower. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: Minimal changes: Adding an ADA accessible trail looping the top of the bluff area, adding an overlook at the edge of the park, selective native vegetative planting, and adding shade trees. Remove invasive species. Add new park amenities -picnic tables, shade tree planting program. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 40 Fi i 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: Abalone Cove has had two significant upgrades completed in 2014, the Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Improvement Project and the Abalone Cove Parking Lot Improvement Project. Improvements included new trails, picnic areas, viewing nodes with telescopes, interpretive panels, a shade structure, native plant landscaping, and discovery zones. The public restroom, staff building and parking lot were significantly improved and an automated pay system was installed for the parking lot. SHOAEUNE PARK BY PROVEMENT5 ` f `11 • Regrade and re -pave the access road from PVDS to beachfront to improve accessibility for emergency response and maintenance vehicles. • Improve site amenities, site -appropriated signage, benches, and picnic tables. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 41 F�• Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET QM 4F PARRS SrsrrM PROPERTY NAME FClovercliff Park ADDRESS 28801 Golden Meadow Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7583-001-900 6/5/1978 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE .18 SOURCE OF FUNDING Donated to the City. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This park land was donated by Mr. and Mrs. Czeslaw Mackiewicz and Mr. and Mrs. James Gehris. The park improvements were constructed and dedicated in 1983. The 7718 square foot pocket park has a path, is landscaped, and large rocks are available for seating with a distant ocean view. RESTRICTIONS The land was donated under the condition that it be used as a view park only. No playground equipment, barbeque equipment or picnic tables can be installed. PRIOR RECOMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: No recommended changes. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Encourage the City of Palos Verdes Estates to preserve the land abutting this park as open space to provide access between the two communities and protect the existing view. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping • Improve walking path, site -appropriate signage, and benches. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 42 1M Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET M PAY" Vom Pitts NUNN PROPERTY NAME Del Cerro Park ADDRESS 2 Park Place PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7581-032-901 9/27/1978 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 3.94 SOURCE OF FUNDING Construction costs were $39,000 and were funded through the Quimby Act assessments for the tract. In 2002, the city acquired the open space parcel surrounding this park site through a County tax -defaulted property auction. The cost of the additional parcel was $18,215.61 and was paid for with City General Funds. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This property was acquired from the Federal government at the same time the City acquired Point Vicente Park and the Civic Center. The property was acquired by the City at a 100 percent discount. The parcel formerly supported a radar installation that was abandoned at about the same time the City incorporated. The existing park was completed in 1983 in conjunction with the development of the Park Place Tract. Construction costs were funded through the Quimby Act assessments for the tract. There are panoramic views of canyons, agriculture, coastal headlands, ocean and offshore islands from the site, and a flat grass play area. It is landscaped and has a safety fence just below the bluff to restrict access to the canyon below without blocking the views. The site also has low lying stone donor appreciation walls installed by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy. There is a public parking lot, but no restrooms. Non - motorized model remote control airplanes are allowed to be flown at this park site by permit. RESTRICTIONS October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 43 LIS The park must remain open for public use in perpetuity for recreation purposes. The park may not be fenced, sold or leased except to another governmental agency with the concurrence of the Department of the Interior. Amenities were constructed under the approved Program of Utilization. Any additional amenities must follow that Program of Utilization or be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Parks and Recreation. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Safety fencing just below the bluff to restrict access to the canyon below without blocking the view. Permanent restroom facility. Tot lot and play equipment. Pedestrian trail connecting the bluff with the parking lot. 5-10 picnic tables near the grove of trees near bluff -top area. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Restrooms, picnic tables, tot lot and play equipment. BBQs, benches, water fountains, trailhead markers, consider public access connections between Del Cerro Park and the Portuguese Bend Nature Preserve. Consider amending Municipal Code to allow hang gliding and parasailing, subject to City permitting process. No additional lighting. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: • Establish Del Cerro Park as a donor recognition site • Augment visitor facilities and provide ADA accessible path to Preserve outlook • Improve Preserve and Trails signage. • Build restroom. 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS There was significant discussion of Del Cerro Park and parking impact on neighbors due to its proximity to the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve. In April 2015 the City Council directed staff to study parking and access options in the Del Cerro Park area. There have been numerous reports of people parking in neighborhoods adjacent to the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve area. This item was addressed by the City Council on June 16, 2015 and direction was given to staff to allow permit parking in the adjacent neighborhoods, modify on -street parking on Crenshaw Boulevard and establish a resident permit parking program at Del Cerro Park. The Del Cerro Community and residents on Valley View Drive now have resident permit parking. The Island View Community also has approved resident permit parking but are not currently utilizing the program pending further internal implementation discussions. Additionally the striping on the eastside of Crenshaw near Del Cerro Park has been modified to eliminate parking. 10 space on the west -side of Crenshaw have been reserved for resident recreational permit parking only. Forty spaces on the west -side of Crenshaw are available for public parking. The seventeen space parking lot in Del Cerro Park is available to the public. The Coast Vision Plan's Site Concept Plan for the site has largely been realized. Del Cerro is a donor recognition site for Preserve supporters with augmented and improved paths, amenities and an ADA path to a Preserve outlook. Recommendations: • Review/assess the parking mitigation measures to gauge their effectiveness • Install additional picnic tables and benches • Shift to drought tolerant landscaping October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 44 Fi • • Implement native plantings at park's upper bluff edge arx of UNCK PAN YEAS PAtz Jn= Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park PROPERTY NAME Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park ADDRESS Armarga Springs Rd. and Pergola PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7585-033-900 2/15/1990 7585-033-904 2/15/1990 7585-033-901 2/15/1990 7585-033-905 2/15/1990 7585-033-902 2/15/1990 7585-033-903 2/15/1990 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE .69 SOURCE OF FUNDING This property was received in satisfaction of the conditions of the Quimby Act upon development of the Wallace Tract. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION The property was originally intended as a radio museum with funds for the improvement of the museum to be raised by the Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Foundation. When the required funds were not raised the property became a neighborhood park maintained by the Wallace Ranch Homeowners Association. There are no improvements to the property other than turf and an irrigation system. The property has been maintained for many years by the adjacent homeowners association and is considered, by them, to be a private open space. RESTRICTIONS PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Consider approaching Wallace Ranch HOA to determine level of interest in accommodating a practice field for soccer, football or lacrosse. Consider modifying fencing to provide access points from Amarga Springs Road and/or provide park signage indicating that the site is a public park. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 45 LOW 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 12015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Approach HOA to consider a shift to drought tolerant planting to replace or reduce the size of the existing grass field. Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Eastview Park ADDRESS 1700 Westmont Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7444-001-900 1989 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 9.9 SOURCE OF FUNDING Site is leased by the City. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This park site is leased from Los Angeles County Sanitation District. Improvements on this site include a children's playground, picnic facilities, jogging path, permanent restroom, landscaping and an off-street parking lot. RESTRICTIONS October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 46 The lease with the Sanitation District precludes adoption of any rules that would limit the use of the park to Rancho Palos Verdes residents and allows for termination of the lease 60 -day notice from the District should the land be needed for Sanitation District use. The City may be required to remove the improvements at the discretion of the District if the land is taken back. Passive Use Designation. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Children's Playground, permanent restroom, jogging path, picnic facilities, landscaping and irrigation, off-street parking lot (note: Park constructed after Master Plan adopted) 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Possible consideration as sports field location, ideally one that would not require the installation of permanent facilities. Expand the parking lot and add BBQs. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Dog Park: Off -leash dogs are a common occurrence at Eastview, which has a reputation as being essentially an off -leash facility. A leash law is in effect at all City Parks. Staff has received numerous complaints about residents who feel uneasy or have had unpleasant encounters with off -leash dog. A dog park would not eliminate this issue, but it would be part of the solution, providing an opportunity for dog owners to legally have their dogs off -leash. Public workshops elicited concerns about the project and significant oppostion, although the online survey had strong support. The Eastview Dog Park would have both small and large dog runs. The proposed location currently has ample, existing shade trees and would have seating areas, access to water, public restrooms, and sufficient parking. The location is buffered from commercial buildings to the west, is compatible with the land use designation and has approval from the Sanitation District. The Dog Park will have fixed hours of operation consistent with the parks current hours. Staff will utilize existing, approved rule signage from the Rancho Caninos Dog Park. Staffing: There are currently no staffed parks on the eastside of the City. One of the recommendations for Eastview Park is to install a small, portable staff office that would be occupied by Recreation part-time staff. Note: City Council recommended on June 30, 2015 that improvements at Eastview Park be modest in scope. Council approved staffing at Eastview on August 4, 2015. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 47 Air e i Draft. Eastview Dog Park Place C—reflects feeddack - from initial 11.5-14 workshop Eastview Recommendations: • Build Dog Park • Install staff office • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans • Improve/Widen Walking Paths • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping D Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET CI1Y w RAH�HQ PAS0$ VfMDF$ PROPERTY NAME Founders Park ADDRESS 1 Ocean Trails Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7564-021-909 2/8/2006 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 5.21 SOURCE OF FUNDING October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 48 N/A CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This park site was deeded to the City by the V.H. Property Corporation as part of the golf course development agreement. The site is adjacent to the Trump National Golf Course Improvements include picnic tables, a gazebo, nearby restrooms, coastal access, walking and biking trails and landscaping. This park, which is dedicated to the courageous visionaries who helped found the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, has tremendous views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina Island. A portion of the site can be reserved for weddings and other ceremonial events. Trump National Golf Course is responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the park as well as handling reservations for rentals which, as of September 2014, are limited to 15 person stand-up ceremonies. The flagpole at Trump National was recently added to Founders Park. RESTRICTIONS There is a condition on the property regarding special events. The park can have up to six temporary events per year within the park including, without limitation, filming events that close off portions of the park. Limited to recreation and open space uses. PRIOR RECCOMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: N/A 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: N/A 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Continue ongoing relationship with Trump National staff to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility of park. • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 49 91 Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET � s RAN040 PALOS YERMS PAAx3SYS91% PROPERTY NAME Frank A. Vanderlip Sr. Park ADDRESS 6500 Seacove Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7573-016-900 1/8/1982 7573-016-901 1/8/1982 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 4.77 SOURCE OF FUNDING This park site was deeded to the City in satisfaction of conditions of development of the T&T tract CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This park site was deeded to the City in satisfaction of conditions of development of the T&T tract. The park improvements were provided under the Quimby Act requirements, and the park was accepted as complete by the City in 1986 as a prerequisite for the development of the Seacove area. A bluff -top safety railing was later added by the City. Other improvements include benches, a safety fence and landscaping. Unobstructed views of the ocean, headlands and islands are the main attraction at this park. RESTRICTIONS Proceeds from any sale of park property must be returned to the Quimby fund for future purchase of park land or development of park amenities. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Install safety railing at the bluff edge and provide trail access. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: None 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 50 W • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET LILT OF duk ONO PAIOi V10015 PAW STMM PROPERTY NAME Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park ADDRESS 29301 Hawthorne Blvd. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7583-022-908 4/3/1980 7583-022-910 5/27/1976 7583-022-911 5/27/1976 7583-022-909 4/3/1980 ACQUISITION COST $1,520,000 ACREAGE 28.68 SOURCE OF FUNDING Construction of the facility used the following funding sources: Quimby Act, Proposition 1, Environmental Excise Tax (EET), General Revenue Sharing, Capital Improvement Fund, Parks and Recreation Fund, Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund. To develop the Lower Hesse Park Trails, the following funding sources were used: Measure A, State Parks and Recreation Grant, Quimby and EET funds. The acquisition of the parks was combined with the purchase of two parcels that make up Grandview Park. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION The park site was acquired from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District. The purchase was completed in two transactions over a five-year period beginning in 1976. Development of the facility was completed in September 1983 at a cost of $3,715,405. This park, with its well -manicured parkland and active community center, is one of the most popular in the City. Among the features available for public enjoyment in the upper park area are baseball and soccer fields, numerous picnic tables with barbecues, playground equipment suitable for toddlers to adolescents, and a well -used '/4 mile walking path. Most of the City's privatized recreation classes are offered at this facility and many Peninsula Senior activities are held here. Additionally three rooms in the 7,300 square foot community center are available for rental for meetings and private parties. In lower Hesse Park, a system of trails, two picnic areas, sand volleyball court, and a parking lot were completed in July 1999. Funds for the $497,800 improvement project October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 51 93 came from: Measure A $210,000 State Parks and Recreation Grant $147,750 Quimby/EET Funds $140,050 RESTRICTIONS None, however, use of various grant, Quimby, and EET funding for construction carries various restrictions. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Lower Hesse Park -Construct four to eight regulation tennis courts, permanent restrooms and parking. The remainder of the area is to be landscaped as a passive, open greenbelt. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Upper Hesse Park: Upgrading the existing ball field to a league standard playing field. Create a dual track around the perimeter of the park for biking, rollerblading and skateboarding. OB Lower Hesse Park: A system of trails, two picnic areas, sand volleyball court, and a parking lot were completed in July 1999. Further improvements to this area have been in a planning/ design phase since 2005. Conceptual designs were prepared in 2011 which included extensive landscape and trail improvements and active elements such as a basketball court, tennis court, paved parking lot, and a small structure which would include a public restroom, staff office and storage. The City Council directed staff in 2012 to work with the Pacific View HOA to scale back the project and phase in improvements. A draft plan featuring improvements and enhancements to the existing trails and amenities has been prepared for the site with phases including an initial phase funded at $500,000. Staff presented a plan to the Pacific View HOA on September 14 and, after making refinements, presented an updated plan with an expanded alternative to all Homeowner Associations at a public workshop on September 21. Staff is currently updating the plan based on feedback from that meeting. Note: This item is scheduled to be presented to the City Council on October 20, 2015. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Upper Hesse Park • Install fitness stations along walking path • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping • Upgrade existing amenities: picnic tables/benches/trash/recycling cans • Improve/Enhance viewpoints • Install solar power system • Replace fencing on northern border of property • Design and install and stabilize view point at the edge of western lawn in Upper Hesse. Include benches etc. • Replace current railroad tie stairs with concrete stairs. • Incorporate results of Lower Hesse Park Improvement Project once completed. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 52 Lower Hesse Park: Note: Improvements to this area have been in a planning/design phase since 2005. Conceptual designs were prepared in 2011 which included extensive landscape and trail improvements and active elements such as a basketball court, tennis court, paved parking lot, and a small structure which would include a public restroom, staff office and storage. The City Council directed staff in 2012 to work with the Pacific View HOA to scale back the project and phase in improvements. A draft plan is being prepared for the site with phases including an initial phase funded at $500,000. Note: Scheduled to be presented to the City Council on October 20, 2015. —Avow Q17 OF fGNMO PAM VnM PARS WOW PROPERTY NAME Gateway Park ADDRESS Palos Verdes Dr. South btwn Peppertree Drive and Schooner Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 2005 ACQUISITION COST See below ACREAGE 17 acres SOURCE OF FUNDING October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 53 95 Gateway Park was purchased in December 2005 together with 406.95 additional acres that are now part of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The total cost for the 423.95 acres was $17,074,057. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This 17 -acre park site open space is surrounded on three sides by the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve. It is located between Peppertree Drive and Schooner Drive on the landward side or Portuguese Bend Drive South. It is located within an active landslide, on land that is currently stable. This area contains outstanding habitat and is heavily used by hikers, mountain bikers, and equestrians. There are no current improvements on site. RESTRICTIONS/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 9.3 acres of this property will be included in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve and is encumbered with a Conservation Easement. .� .�. FT Gateway Park • h. _ 4 _ - -:- . Proposed Gateway Layout PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: NA 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Recommended that a portion of proposed Portuguese Bend site commonly referred to as the Sandbox be kept out of the proposed Preserve property and utilized as an Equestrian Park. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: The Coast Vision Plan identified the park area to be the future home of an equestrian center with riding rings and public parking that would also serve as a trailhead to the Preserve. None of the proposed improvements would consist of permanent structures because of the active land movement in the area. The equestrian center improvements were envisioned to be sponsored by the local equestrian October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 54 community. To date, no formal request to construct the improvements from the equestrian community has been received by the City. Gateway Park Concept Plan T `I 12 —:1 Pe, 11 PumozeP oRmg ' J '41 E9 P p0.iln9 Pim Pultlingz +/rlf ogia—citlw„o�w—r R—gas d Qioe m e . I � y� ck Parting 7 - 2008 Coastal Vision Plan Gateway Park Conceputal Design 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS and ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background Information When the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve was first created in 2004, an approximately 25 - acre portion was set aside at the southern tip of the Portuguese Bend Reserve to be used as an Active Recreation Area (ARA). Subsequently, in 2008, the City Council adopted Coast Vision Plan, which identified the area, now known as Gateway Park, to be the future home of an equestrian center with riding rings and public parking that would also serve as a trailhead to the Preserve. None of the proposed improvements would consist of permanent structures because of the active land movement in the area. The equestrian center improvements were envisioned to be sponsored by the local equestrian community. To date, no formal request to construct the improvements from the equestrian community has been received by the City. On April 1, 2014, the City Council reconfigured and reduced the size of Gateway Park from 25 -acres to 18 -acres. At this same meeting, the Council also removed the 40 -acre Archery Range property located on the opposite side of Palos Verdes Drive South from the Preserve. The Management Agreement with the Palos Verdes Land Conservancy was amended to reflect these changes. Subsequently, staff prepared a conceptual plan for Gateway Park to serve as the main parking area and southern "gateway" to the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The concept was developed in part to relieve some of the parking and congestion problems that have developed on Crenshaw Boulevard and the area around Del Cerro Park. The concept plan was presented to the community through the PMPU process and consists of the following elements: • Dirt access road and parking lot with approximately 30 parking spaces, October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 55 97 including several spaces large enough for horse trailers • Picnic tables and seating areas • Hitching posts • Staff/Ranger drop-in trailer (portable) • Public restrooms (portable) • Interpretive and educational information on portable kiosks • Emergency vehicle access Gateway Park would be a staffed park site, and staff would further educate the public on the rules of the Preserve. Because Gateway Park sits within an active landslide, all improvements would be temporary and mobile. Public Input: Numerous strong concerns were expressed during the PMPU public outreach process regarding this proposal including safety, security, and the area's fragile geology. Residents expressed concerns that visitors would park at Gateway Park and then cross Palos Verdes Drive South to access the beaches and coves. Many residents referenced a tragedy that occurred on July 4PthP, 2014 where an individual drowned and numerous rescues were necessary due to high surf conditions. Social media and increased public awareness of sites such as Abalone Cove and the Nature Preserve were also identified as concerns. 111:096T17111L_'iT•Fii a iii Based on City Council's direction on June 30, 2015 no improvements at Gateway Park are recommended. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 56 Wj RAWM FIMS VERM PAW ITSMA PROPERTY NAME Grandview Park ADDRESS 6000 Ironwood St. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7546-026-901 3/20/1981 7546-026-902 5/17/1976 7546-026-903 3/14/1979 ACQUISITION COST $469,286 ACREAGE 17.54 SOURCE OF FUNDING This property was acquired in three parcels. Two were purchased from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District at a cost of $434,286, and one from the Norfolk Machine Company for $35,000. The funds for the purchase were probably from the Capital Improvement Fund. The Norfolk Machine Company parcel provided access to the site from Montemalaga Drive. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This park site was acquired in three parcels. Two were purchased from the Palos Verdes peninsula Unified School District, and the third was purchased from the Norfolk Machine Company which provided access to the site from Montemalaga Drive. This was once known as the Highland site (PVPUSD). Purchased in conjunction with the Hesse Park parcels. In the agreement with the school district, the City agreed to pay $380,000 per year to the school district, over a five year period beginning on March 15, 1976. This amounted to $1,520,000 over the five year period. In return, the City acquired the seven parcels of land. Five parcels known as the Crestmont site became part of Hesse Park and the Highland site. There have been no improvements made to the property. RESTRICTIONS Grandview Park, since it was obtained from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School, District cannot be sold with a public vote. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 57 re 1989 Parks Master Plan: Install a parking lot and provide for vehicular and pedestrian access. Improve into a cultivated, passive open space with a small tot lot, restrooms and five to ten picnic sites (tables and pads) in the bowl below the plateau. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Suggested small soccer fields and restrooms on the flat areas. Trail access, bike trails, and skateboard facilities should be considered. Although significant grading would be required and access, parking, and neighborhood opposition would have to be considered, this site has the most potential for athletic fields of all City -owned properties. Recommended that the canyon areas on the east and west edges of the site, with a strip along the northern edge of the park to connect the two canyons, be preserved within the NCCP. Engage in public process that would engage recreational user groups and neighborhood residents. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Grandview Park offers a large opportunity for development and meeting community recreational needs since it is 18 acres of completely undeveloped parkland. However, because of the site's challenging topography and that it is undeveloped, substantial grading and installation of utilities will be required and will add to the cost of developing the site. In 2010, City Council approved a conceptual plan for Grandview Park, including improved access, amenities, and recreational elements. At the time of this Parks Master Plan Update, the conceptual plans were undergoing the Mitigated Negative Declaration environmental analysis. • Recommendation: Dependent on the results on the environmental analysis process, proceed with the "Sycamore Option" beginning with Phase 1 which would include construction of a natural parking lot, restrooms/office, play area, picnic area, and landscaping. • Initiate Facilitated design/pubic outreach/phasing process for remaining elements of Grandview plan including activity lawn, viewing nodes, discovery area, flexible cycling area and walking trails October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 58 100 J fr Ajy - .r J06 %L, Ca J 1 e,. C.d'} f Council Approved Sycamore Plan (Grandview Park) " 4F tAKIRO Pao$'Y ool$ PARKS SWIM Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Ladera Linda ADDRESS 32201 Forrestal Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7564-001-905 9/27/1989 7564-001-911 5/4/1984 7564-001-906 9/27/1989 7564-001-912 8/31/1981 7564-001-908 5/4/1984 7564-001-913 5/4/1984 October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 59 101 7564-001-910 9/27/1989 ACQUISITION COST $974,400 ACREAGE 11.21 SOURCE OF FUNDING Funding for acquisition costs were from the Capital Improvement Fund for Payment made in Years 1983-1986. It is uncertain which funding source was utilized for payments prior to that time. Probable funding sources were Quimby Act, EET, and possibly Federal Revenue Sharing. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION The City purchased the former Ladera Linda Elementary School from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District. Multiple parcels were purchased over an eight year period beginning in 1981 The former elementary school site's amenities include a parking lot, restrooms, paddle tennis courts, tot lot, playground, basketball court, soccer and softball fields. Ladera Linda is also home to the Discovery Room which features live and static exhibits of local flora, fauna and historic information. Staff and volunteers provide educational programs on-site for a large variety of school, youth and other groups as well as conduct docent -led hikes in the surrounding hills and Forrestal Property. This location also has a multipurpose room and classroom available for rent for meetings and private parties. There are excellent views of the cliff face, hillsides, coastline and ocean. Once of the classrooms was recently established as a Discovery Room that features static displays about the Peninsula's geology, flora and fauna. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2013 Infrastructure Report Card prepared by SA Associates, an engineering firm hired to assess the current condition of existing public structures in the City. The Ladera Linda Community Center received an overall infrastructure score of "F" (FAIL). This rating is given to those building that are in very poor condition. The infrastructure report card utilizes grading criterion that the general public can relate to, similar to the grading used in education. It is the same criterion used by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in infrastructure grading. RESTRICTIONS There are no deed restrictions for this property. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Improve the middle and upper parking lots as needed. Regrade and pave the access road between the lower and middle parking lots. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Consider demolition of buildings for athletic fields or new community park. Consider extensive remodeling of existing buildings and improving parking facilities. Recommended detailed cost -benefit analysis of options. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 60 102 Development of New Community Center • Develop facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for development of new Ladera Linda Park Community Center. • Incorporate expanded Nature Center/Preserve Annex and Sheriff/Ranger drop-in office into Master Plan Process • Upon completion of Master Plan Process, proceed with demolition of existing buildings and construction of new Community Center Additional Enhancements: Recommendations below should be done in conjunction with Community Center development • Pave access road between lower and middle parking lots • Improve landscaping on existing multi -use playing field • Upgrade surfacing of current asphalt play area: keep two basketball courts • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible • Install interior paddle tennis fencing separating the two courts. Note: Local Ladera Linda Residents conducted an informal neighborhood survey. The results can be found in Appendix G. LOTT Of N . PAW STSTM PROPERTY NAME Lower Point Vicente Park/Point Vicente Interpretive Center ADDRESS 31501 Palos Verdes Drive West PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7573-002-904 7/23/2004 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 27.5 SOURCE OF FUNDING Land was acquired by the County from the Federal Government in 1978. The City entered into a 50 -year joint powers agreement with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors (at no annual rental fee) on July 17, 1979. The agreement provided that the City develop and operate the facility under the conditions provided in the approved Program of Utilization prepared by the County and amended by the City. The Point Vicente Interpretive Center opened in 1984, and was expanded in 2006. Development costs were funded by the following sources: SB174 Urban Open Space and Recreation Grant, State, October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 61 103 Urban and Coastal Bond Act of 1976, Federal land and Water Conservation Fund and the City Recreation Department Development Fund. The County deeded this property to the City in May 2004. CURRENT USEIDESCRIPTION Lower Point Vicente is zoned Open Space Recreation, and is identified for passive recreation in the City's General Plan. The site includes the City's Point Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC), at 10,000 square feet of developed building area, and 13,000 square feet of hard-scaped plazas and outdoor amphitheater area. PVIC is focused on the coastal setting, marine life and history of the Peninsula, and is a center for community functions. A pathway along the bluff edge of the site connects into the Ocean Front Estates bluff front trail system. The site is a popular destination for whale watching, picnics, weddings, and rentals. It is also the site of the annual Whale of a Day community event. Point Vicente Interpretive Center opened in 1984 with a mission to present and interpret the unique features and history of the Palos Verdes Peninsula. It offers educational and recreational opportunities along with dramatic coastline vistas. Its location provides spectacular opportunities to view the annual migration of the Pacific gray whale from December through April. The Interpretive Center features exhibits about the area and members of Los Serenos de Point Vicente, the Center's volunteer docent organization, lead tours of the Center and nearby paths and trails. This beautiful park, on the cliffs adjacent to the Point Vicente Lighthouse, is the only location in the City where an outdoor wedding and reception (permit required) may be held. Picnic tables are available, however fires and barbecues are prohibited at this site. Onsite trails connecton the Northside of the property to the adjacent trail system at Ocean Front Estates. RESTRICTIONSIADDITIONAL INFORMATION Subject to Federal Program of Utilization. Excavation cannot occur in areas capped for lead remediation. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Develop an educational center, add interpretive signage, obtain an agreement with U.S. Coast Guard station for access to the lighthouse to conduct docent -led tours. Build a golf course on the grounds of Point Vicente Park/Civic Center and PVIC. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Pursue the completion of PVIC expansion project and reopen the park fully to the public. Provide a trail connection between the PVIC property and the bluff top trail at Oceanfront Estates. Pursue grant funding for "Outdoor History Museum". 2008 Coast Vision Plan: Development of Outdoor History Museum/PVIC Phase III, expanded parking and access. Determine a broad site design and program possibilities for publicly accessible space at the adjacent Point Vicente Lighthouse property should the City obtain permission to this land via the Coast Guard, and a Complentary Education Public Use Facility, focusing on the role of companion animals and the unique story of animal life on the Peninsula. In August 2011, the Annenberg Foundation formally withdrew their development application for Lower Point Vicente. Since that time, the Council adopted Vision Plan for Lower Point Vicente continued to show the Annenberg facility as a future project for this property. In order to update the Vision Plan document to remove the Annenberg October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 62 104 Foundation's project from Lower Point Vicente given the withdrawal of the project, the Council directed Staff to place such an item on a future Council agenda. At its November 20, 2012 meeting, the Council amended the Vision Plan by removing the Annenberg Foundation's proposal and substituting it with a public green area. The Council also directed Staff to initiate a public outreach process to develop an updated plan for Lower Point Vicente (the Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project) that would eventually be incorporated into the Council adopted Vision Plan. The amended site plan for Lower Point Vicente was developed based on public input gathered during the February 5 and March 25, 2015 workshops and was approved by the City Council on July 7, 2015. 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS The conceptual design for the site now contains the following recommended components: • Maintain the existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center • Improve and expand parking and vehicular access: Parking, driveways, and drop-off areas should be provided in order to serve all site uses. • Assure pedestrian access: A pedestrian portal and trailhead along Palos Verdes Drive West at the north side of the site allows for pedestrian access into the new open space areas. • Formalize Open Space and Trail Networks: A new trailhead and trail system encompassing an enhanced existing bluff-fron trail, as well as new connections through and around the site inland would open access across the site, connect to the Preserve Trail system and extend towards the bluff and the Upper Point Vicente sites. • Open space and picnic (grassland) areas are to be planted with native and locally appropriate vegetation. • A bioswale is included along the north side of the site and through the parking area(s). This naturalized feature would help capture and filter storm water runoff, as well as provide habitat. • Noise and visual impact: Care should be taken to avoid negative impact on the site's neighbors as well as drivers and cyclists along the adjacent roadway, through sound mitigation, preservation of sight lines, and related design strategies. Recommendations: • Implement Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project • Incorporate Phase II Interior Exhibit Update into Master Plan once process is complete and approved by Council. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible • Install Solar Power System on the Point Vicente Interpretive Center building October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 63 105 Lower Fo-irLt vinente ConcepY tion h7C—dO7-22 7 5@ �i6 Fl Nolive N-12orte'.,.,.s. CTI N II1diCHO PAM MONS PARKS STSTM PROPERTY NAME Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park ADDRESS 1 Ocean Trails Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED ` 9 � t5 L _ y IN M1tY.i tY 'e5 9_ Peird V4t is Idesprehve C1h. 1 2 P..b g Lot was Li—k. a. Gluukrd s o,-bda .." A Pigs Are®; (P" be pk d thert,.gh—MI — — $ec r,d®vrrvg 6iilfi @i—k and AdjmmJ FiobrlaP 101. -- Prenerly L.ne Ar—* Re a=erded N para ion between , °.h nrrdp'Wg lyir-1544fi rariL CTI N II1diCHO PAM MONS PARKS STSTM PROPERTY NAME Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park ADDRESS 1 Ocean Trails Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7564-021-019* 5/23/2011 October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 64 106 1 L Cl" W RAH9w4 PA14S��Ef �AIKS SVSTIM4 October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 65 107 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 1.5 SOURCE OF FUNDING Deeded to the City by the Trump National Golf Course as part of the golf course development agreement. Officially acquired on May 23, 2011. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION Passive park with tremendous views of Trump National Golf Course and Pacific Ocean. Site features picnic tables, benches, a water fountain, a dolphin statue and a bridge named in honor of LAPD Swat Officer Randall Simmons who was killed in the line of duty. The park is named for the original Mayor of Rancho Palos Verdes. Property is maintained by Trump National Golf Course. RESTRICTIONS Use must be consistent with approvals of overall project. There is a condition on the property regarding special events. The park can have up to six temporary events per year within the park including, without limitation, filming events that close off portions of the park. PRIOR RECOMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: N/A 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: N/A 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible • Continue to maintain positive working relationship with Trump National to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility of park. 1 L Cl" W RAH9w4 PA14S��Ef �AIKS SVSTIM4 October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 65 107 Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Martingale Trailhead Park ADDRESS 22 Martingale Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7568-007-900 2/14/1978 ACQUISITION COST $46,392 ACREAGE .98 SOURCE OF FUNDING Unknown CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This parcel was designated for construction as a trailhead park and to establish easements for a fifteen foot wide equestrian trail that traverses this parcel as well as Lots 20 and 21 of the same tract. Park improvements were completed and the park was dedicated in 1990. The site is located in an Equestrian Overlay District. The trailhead provides access to a trails system serving the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills and Rolling Hills Estates. Both hikers and equestrians utilize this park. Improvements include landscaping, a tri -level drinking fountain which serves horses, humans and small animals, a mounting block, and a seating rock. RESTRICTIONS There are no deed restrictions for this property. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Improve maintenance or replace existing California peppertree with a more appropriate species or remove. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Upgrade existing amenities including water fountain and signage. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 66 UE PROPERTY NAME Pelican Cove (formerly Point Vicente Fishing Access) ADDRESS 31300 Palos Verdes Dr. West PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7573-002-902 7/23/2004 ACQUISITION COST ACREAGE 10.53 SOURCE OF FUNDING The City acquired this property from Los Angeles County through a grant deed in 2004. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 67 109 This site features a paved parking lot, restroom building, improved trail to the shoreline, and incredible Catalina and ocean view. Native plantings surround the parking lot which links to the public parking lot at Terranea and the adjacent coastal trail system. The parking lot, restroom building, and the landscaping is maintained by the Terranea Resort pursuant to the Council -adopted Terranea Maintenance Agreement. Name changed to Pelican Cove in 2011. RESTRICTIONS 9.3 acres of this property will be included in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve and is encumbered with a Conservation Easement. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Noted that developer of current Terranea Property is required to expand this park by 2.2 acres, improve the fence and public restrooms, increase the size of the existing off-street parking lot by 50 spaces, and maintain all improvements. This park will provide a connection to the bluff top trail network that will be built in conjunction with the development of the resort. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Upgrade existing amenities. a1YW "W10 NU ifs MISS W17M Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Point Vicente Park and Civic Center ADDRESS 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7573-002-908 3/6/1979 7573-002-912 6/7/1985 7573-002-909 9/27/1978 7573-002-913 6/5/1987 ACQUISITION COST $950,000 ACREAGE 73.35 SOURCE OF FUNDING October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 68 110 $450,000 land $500,000 building (Capital funding) DESCRIPTION 65.12 acres of land for this park was acquired from the Federal Government after its use as a NIKE Missile Base was closed and it was declared surplus by the General Services Administration (GSA). The 8.23 acres designated Civic Center was purchased from GSA in two parcels. The park site surrounds the City's Civic Center and includes open grassy areas, a sand volleyball court, tennis court, "Rancho Caninos" a temporary dog park, and a spectacular view of the ocean. This is the site of the City's annual July 4PthP Independence Day Celebration. 65.12 acres of the property is part of the Alta Vicente Nature Preserve. By permit, model helicopters are allowed to be flown at this park site in a designated area surrounding a helicopter pad located near the maintenance yard. The U.S. Coast Guard also owns a 3.93 acre parcel located on the west promontory overlooking the Point Vicente Lighthouse, which is the site of several communications towers and an abandoned WWII -era artillery bunker. RESTRICTIONS/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/CURRENT USE Background Information The size of the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center property, combined with its tremendous ocean views, few nearby neighbors and location adjacent to City Hall, has made it a focal point for potential development plans and site improvements throughout the City's history. The property, which boasts spectacular coastal and ocean views, is a tremendous resource that could potentially accommodate a number of civic, recreation, and cultural needs for the community. The property consists of three components: Point Vicente Park The 65.12 acres of park land that was acquired from the Federal Government after its use as a NIKE Missile Base was closed and the property was declared surplus by the General Services Administration (GSA). The majority of the park is part of the Alta Vicente Nature Reserve, which is part of the larger 1,450 -acre Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, and has been set aside for habitat preservation under the Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP). In addition to the habitat areas and existing public trail network, other land uses include a 5.5 -acre farm, an unpaved public parking lot and an emergency helipad. By permit, model helicopters are allowed to be flown in a designated area surrounding a helipad. Civic Center The 8.23 acres of designated Civic Center was purchased from GSA in two parcels. There are no use restrictions on the land acquired by the City in -fee for Civic Center use. The Civic Center includes the City Hall offices, maintenance yard, an open grassy areas, a sand volleyball court, one tennis court and the "Rancho Caninos" temporary dog park. This is the site of the City's annual July 4Pt1P Independence Day Celebration. Palos Verdes on the Net, Peninsula Volunteer Alert Network (PVAN) and Peninsula Seniors also have facilities on the property. Coast Guard The U.S. Coast Guard also owns a 3.93 acre parcel located on the west promontory overlooking the Point Vicente Lighthouse, which is the site of several communications October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 69 111 towers and a historic WWII -era artillery bunker. Active Recreational Opportunities Point Vicente Park is conditioned by deed to allow continuous public access for recreational use in perpetuity. The land may not be sold or transferred to any entity other than another governmental agency, and then only with the consent of the Department of the Interior. The park land has an approved Program of Utilization (POU) that describes future development. Any change to that Program must be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Parks and Recreation. The park land may not be leased and any concession agreement for operation of recreational facilities must be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Recreation and Parks. While the majority of the park is restricted for passive recreation, the POU identifies a 6.6 -acre area in the northern portion of the property to be used for active recreational purposes. However, this area of the site is now part of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, where active recreation would not be permitted. According to the Conservation & Open Space Elements section of the City's General Plan, "Any changes in land use to the property through future Master Planning efforts would require approval by the Planning Commission and City Council through public hearings along with review and approval of a change, if necessary, to the Program of Utilization by the National Park Service." Staff approached the National Park Service in 2014 about the possibility of moving the 6.6 -acre active recreation area from its current location adjacent to the Villa Capri Condominiums to the upper portion of the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities. In September 2014, the National Park Service representative concurred that this proposal would be consistent with the site's POU (see attached email). A potential reconfiguration of the 6.6 -acre area to the upper portion of the site is depicted in yellow in the aerial photograph below: Proposed ±6.6 -Acre Active Recreation Area LADA NIKE Site 55, Point Vicente, Rancho Palos Verdes (GSA No. 9-D-Cafff-1088) October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 70 M Potential Skate Park/Plaza On April 15PthP, 2014, the Council tasked the Director of Recreation and Parks to work with the Skatepark PV Inc. (SPV) Board of Directors to review, evaluate and modify as necessary, the skate park proposal by SPV and report back to the City Council with a recommendation specifically addressing the feasibility of allowing a privately funded skate park to be constructed at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. Staff analyzed the feasibility of the project by looking at a number of factors including a) needs assessment; b) consistency with the 1989 Parks Master Plan; c) consistency with the 2008 Coast Vision Plan; d) Program of Utilization/Zoning; e) financial/liability analysis; and f) visual/aesthetic concerns. Upon completion of the analysis, staff believes that, if it is the desire of the Council and the community to have such a facility at Point Vicente Park, it would be feasible to construct a skate park on the property that conforms with the site's current zoning/land use deed restrictions, and that issues concerning financing, insurance and visual/aesthetic concerns could be addressed through the proper agreements, operating procedures, and project design/site placement. Council directed staff to update the Parks Master Plan prior to making a decision regarding the SPV skate park proposal. It was Staff's position that a skate park is a feasible component that would serve a wide range of people, but particularly the traditionally underserved teenager and young adult population. A skate park received a 4 out of 5 on Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Workshop comment cards, strong support from the Tape Dot Exercise, and slightly more respondents choosing to support the skate park, over don't support it on the online survey. (Note: the term "skate park" was used on the online survey, rather than SPV's preferred "skate plaza" nomenclature. This was done for the sake of clarity because "skate park" is a more common name for such a facility.) f3 k AIRS l HANORAIL/ STEP- 3' TALL — PROWJSEU RES7'Rf70M ,TLYO STALL LINISE. -w O�TSTI7E GIktNN.aNCFO' PLAN V1EW CRATE: 04/29/14 SIZE 14,000 FTS MULTI—U$E AREA � • RVP MULTI -USE PLAZA, �� 0 Pi I I a f MULTI -USE AREA PLAN I DeAgn 4tudfat RANCHO PALQ5 VERDE% CC Overview of proposed 15,000 square foot skate plaza location Staff and SPV are engaged in a detailed dialogue about the project's scope including square footage, design, fundraising, parking image, potential number and age of users, October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 71 113 hours of operation and other topics. The 15,000 square foot design may be larger than needed. Several Councilmembers expressed concern about its size and prominent location. The very popular Peck Park Skate Park in San Pedro, for example, is approximately 8,000 feet. A smaller footprint would also allow for more flexibility in where the skate park is located on site and how it is configured, leaving additional room for other components, additional parking, or a larger village green. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center has ample space, is located on a major street, and can be accessed by public transportation. Skateboarders would not be able to access the location by skateboard due an existing skateboarding ban on Hawthorne Boulevard. SPV has indicated that they would be able and willing to finance the design and construction of the project. Below is a list of South Bay skate parks compiled by Recreation staff. Additional skate parks located outside of the South Bay are in Appendix 5. SKATE PARK SQUARE FOOTAG ES Facilities located with the South Bay Cities Boundary FACILITY ADDRESS/CITY SURFACE SIZE / COMMENTS SF Alondra 3353 Redondo Beach, Concrete 14,000 Lawndale Channel Street 700 W. Channel, San Concrete 10,000 Pedro Compton 123 N. Rose, Compton Concrete 12,000 EI Segundo 405 E. Grand, EI Concrete 4,000 Youth Segundo Eucalyptus Park 12100 Inglewood, Concrete 10,000 / Larry Guidi Hawthorne Hermosa 710 Pier, Hermosa Concrete 10,000 Beach Peck Park 560 Western, San Concrete 8,000 Pedro Veterans 22400 Moneta, Carson Concrete 10,000 Wilmington 325 Neptune, Concrete 10,000 Wilmington Wilson Park 2200 Crenshaw, Wood / 23,000 Closed Torrance Concrete indefinitely repairs needed Sept.' 15 PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Develop Senior Center. Add irrigation, turf and fencing to the athletic field. Add public restroom. Construct two paddle tennis courts. Add pedestrian paths throughout property. Construct amphitheater with semi -circular benches. Build Municipal golf course which would wrap around existing and proposed park facilities October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 72 114 (included Point Vicente Interpretive Center) 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force • Remodeled City Hall Complex • Relocated Maintenance Yard • Underground Parking • Gymnasium and Pool Complex • Village Green • Band Shell with Stage • Art Center • Baseball and Soccer Fields • Vol leyball/Handball/Tetherball/Paddle Tennis Courts • Trail Heads to Access Open Space Upper Paint Vicente Conceptual Plan Fig. 1 . (REVISED) 2008 Coast Vision Plan: Recommended a formal master plan of site to include: • Market analysis of potential arts and recreation facilities • Programs to serve a range of possible uses and user groups • Parking needs analysis • Incorporate utilities study • Pursue funding sources Components Included: • New City hall • New City Surface Parking Lot • Village Green • Community Center • Cultural Center • Trail Head • Unspecified new uses with consolidate parking October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 73 115 2 — F, y CP 6 ti 6 5 1 1 New CtyHai 2 Neral Cry SLrTaGe ParKr1g LL:t 3 +Alage Green d Ccmmunty Cerrter 5CulbraICerter � ✓ Lona ic-rnr Fl,,-,n 6 New uses wtt iccrimildated parldng 3 Trall Head H Hellpad CP coast Guard Property Coast Vision Plan/Long Term Plan 12015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS The number of undeveloped acres at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center combined with its tremendous ocean views, and location adjacent to City Hall has made it a focal point for potential development plans and site improvements throughout the City's history. The Point Vicente Park/Civic Center site has been viewed as a resource that could accommodate a number of civic, recreation, and cultural needs. The City Hall buildings are in great need of renovation to meet organizational needs, comply with safety and code requirements, and comply with all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines. Recommendations: • Authorize a facilitated Master Plan Design and Public Outreach Process for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center using the Coast Vision Plan Long Term Plan as a base document with the inclusion of a skate park. • Include the following components to be considered during the site's Master Plan Process ✓ City Hall ✓ Community Center ✓ Skate Park/Plaza ✓ Outdoor Swimming Pool ✓ Shade Structures ✓ Children's Playground ✓ Walking paths w/fitness stations ✓ Enhanced amenities: picnic tables, benches, trash/recycling cans/BBQs ✓ Improved Village Green ✓ Tennis courts October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 74 116 ✓ Permanent dog park ✓ Wall of honor • Direct staff to continue the process to move the 6.6 acre parcel from its current location along the northerly boundary of the lower portion of Point Vicente to the upper portion of the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities • Incorporate results of Public Works Corporation Storage Yard Relocation process to study the possibility of spreading out the storage yard to strategic locations throughout the City with a smaller central office at City Hall, thereby increasing the efficiency of Public Works operations and allow for the potential development of all or part of the existing maintenance yard. CITY Of UNCHO FAM PAIKS SXSTIN PROPERTY NAME RPV BEACH ADDRESS 1 Ocean Trails Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7564-021-019* May 23, 2011 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE -- SOURCE OF FUNDING Acquired as part of the Trump National Golf Course Development Agreement. Acquisition date February 8, 2006. Former Name Trump Beach. CURRENT USEIDESCRIPTION Public beach accessible by steep trail. Public access to trail via Trump National Golf Course and Founders Park. Native habitat area. RESTRICTIONS October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 75 117 Must be consistent with approvals of overall project site. Dogs are not allowed on beach. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: None 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Make no changes to the site Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET '44 J Uri ff PANTS 4'd4'FliM PROPERTY NAME Robert E. Ryan Park ADDRESS 30359 Hawthorne Blvd. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7588-022-900 4/12/1977 7588-018-901 4/27/1982 7588-018-902 (3,551 sq ft portion) 3/30/10 ACQUISITION COST $1 ACREAGE 10.3 SOURCE OF FUNDING This property was transferred from the County to the City. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION The park was originally constructed and owned by the County of Los Angeles. Named for City Founder and former Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor Robert E. Ryan. Park former name was Rancho Palos Verdes Park. Upon incorporation of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, title to the park was transferred from the County to the City. This park features a October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 76 118 community building with a small activity room and patio which are available for rent, a tot lot, playground, picnic areas with barbecues, fields, and a baseball diamond. Views from this park are superior, and the mature trees add to the atmosphere. RESTRICTIONS The property must be utilized in perpetuity for public recreation purposes. Should the City fail to do so, the deed specifies that the property be transferred back to the County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation. The softball field was leveled and improved in 2011 and a parking lot improvement project was completing in 2014, which increased the number of parking spaces and improved automobile access for disabled park patrons. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Expand parking facilities water fountains. Consider adding additional softball field. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Remodel or build new community building. Original building dates back to the 1960s. Larger building could accommodate more rentals and classes. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible • Improved Amenities: Benches, picnic tables, bbqs, trash/recycling cans October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 77 119 UNcMa PAIGE MHS POKS SYSTEM, PROPERTY NAME VISTA CATALINA PARK ADDRESS 1 Ocean Trails Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED Lot D 7564-027-005 Still VH prop Lot K 7564-020-112 1-26-06 VHS Prop Lot E—APN n/a Still VH Prop 7564-020-900 1-26-06 RPV Prop Lot G 7564-020-109 Still VH Prop Lot 1 7564-020-111 Still VH prop ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE .2 SOURCE OF FUNDING Deeded to the City as part of the golf course development agreement. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION Small pocket park located adjacent to PV Drive South at main entrance to Trump National across from Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park. Park has magnificent views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina. RESTRICTIONS Must be consistent with approvals of overall project site. There is a condition on the property regarding special events. The park can have up to six temporary events per year within the park including, without limitation, filming events that close off portions of the park PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: na 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force na 2008 Coast Vision Plan: none 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible • Continue to work with Trump National staff to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 78 120 RELATED PLANS A. Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Public Use Master Plan (PUMP) The Palos Verdes Nature Preserve (Preserve) encompasses approximately 1,400 acres comprised of eleven individual Reserves, 424 acres of which consists of the Portuguese Bend Reserve. The Preserve is owned by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (except for 20 acres of Aqua Armaga Reserve that is owned by the PVPLC) and is managed by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy (PVPLC) for ecological values and habitat restoration. This preserve is home to coastal sage scrub habitat, a community of intensely fragrant and highly drought resistant native shrubs and flowering plants. Living throughout this rare habitat are many different animals, including the threatened California gnatcatcher and coastal cactus wren and two species of endangered butterflies. The individual reserves provide excellent recreational opportunities, as they are full of networks of hiking, equestrian, and bicycle trails. There are 33 miles of hiking, equestrian, and mountain bike trails available to the public. The Preserve PUMP Committee was established in 2006 and addresses issues germane to the Preserve such as public access, trailhead locations, parking, trail use, fencing, signage and lighting. The Preserve Trails Plan was adopted by the City Council in 2008, and the PUMP document, which includes the Preserve Trails Plan, was adopted by the City Council on April 2, 2013. The Palos Verdes Nature Preserve already has a well-established system for receiving public input, reporting incidents, and initiating changes, and pursuing enhancements to the existing Preserve. This includes the quarterly Preserve public forum meetings held by the City and the PVPLC. The PUMP is subject to periodic review and updates by the City Council with input from the public. B. Trails Network Plan Update A significant effort to combine and unify the various City trails -related plan is currently underway. Four public workshops have already been conducted thus far and continues to occur with the next workshop scheduled for October 21St. The Trails Network Plan Update is being facilitated by the Community Development Department and seeks to consolidate and update the following plans: ✓ Conceptual Bikeways Plan -updated 1996 ✓ Conceptual Trails Plan- updated 1993 ✓ Preserve Trails Plan ✓ Ocean Front Estates Trails ✓ Terranea Resort Trails ✓ Trump National Trails ✓ California Coastal Trail Proposed changes are subject to public input and City Council approval. The trail related "Connections" section of the Coastal Vision Plan will be incorporated into the TNP update process. October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 79 121 C. Coastal Vision Plan Incorporation Design Guidance Section 5 of the Coast Vision Plan "Design Guidance" (contained in Appendix C) is included in the PMPU as a planning tool for future park projects. The goals of the "Design Guidance" section are as follows: • Respect and use the natural slope and character of key sites. • Be sensitive of neighbor's views to key sites, and maximize views from those sites. • Capitalize on the natural setting of Rancho Palos Verdes, and take the indoors outdoors by spilling interior space onto walkways and public open spaces. Bring the outdoors into buildings by opening interior spaces to views and natural light. • Ensure that site design is integrated and serves the whole system of the community in terms of program, user needs, context and sustainability. • Preserve and enhance the environmental quality of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes as well as the marine ecosystems along its coastline. Develop key sites and on-site parking in an environmentally sustainable manner. • Maximize the City's water resources by capturing and maximizing the use of rainwater and sensitively managed urban runoff. The section also has broad design considerations addessing parking circulation, public gathering areas, building siting, water management and conservation, building and architectural features design, building configuration, suggested materials and colors, "green" building design, and historic adaptation. Coast Vision Plan Connections The Coast Vision Plan's "Connections" section has design and planning guidance for trailheads and vista points that would prove helpful in planning and implementing future enhancements to City parks. The Updated Coast Vision Plan (including Connections and Design Guidance section are attached). October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 80 122 Appendices: Appendix A: 1989 Parks Master Plan Update Appendix B: 2005 Open Space Planning & Recreation and Parks Task Force Final Report Appendix C: Coast Vision Plan Report and Amendments Appendix D. Comprehensive Public Outreach Results Appendix E Sport Fields/Facilities/Skate Park/Youth League Information Appendix F: Status/Update of 1989 Parks Master Plan Recommendations Appendix G: Ladera Linda Resident -Generated Survey Appendix H: Park Amenities Uff Mr IN W,f L October 6, 2015 Parks Master Plan Update P. 81 123 THE KEY SITES Four Key Sites have been selected for inclusion in the Vision Plan because they serve as key open space parcels within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, but are not a part of the City's NCCP Preserve, and/or because they provide ideal public use opportunities. Although several of the key sites have been the subject of community conversation and planning prior to the Vision Plan process, there has previously been no public process to consider all of these properties together, and to consider the unique role each site plays in the context of the emerging Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. Goals for each of these sites were developed and reviewed with City Staff as part of the Vision Plan process, and were also reviewed with the City Council and community members, as part of the public process for this Plan. Background information on existing conditions at each key site, together with site goals, site concept design descriptions and recommendations for implementation, are included below for the following Vision Plan key sites. UPPER POINT VICENTE Presently housing the City Hall complex, this site is identified as the civic and cultural heart of Rancho Palos Verdes. Additional facilities for the arts, culture and community, together with connections to the surrounding trail network are envisioned that would complement the ultimate build out of the Civic Center. LOWER POINT VICENTE Given the existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center's focus on the marine environment of the Rancho Palos Verdes coastline, the educational emphasis of this site is proposed to be expanded to include outdoor history museum elements long envisioned by the Point Vicente Interpretive Center docents, together with a complementary educational public use in a separate building. These components are intended to expand the learning opportunities at the site, to connect the ocean and land, people and animals, and the community. DEL CERRO PARK While the park functions of this site remain unchanged, its amenities are enhanced to celebrate the environmental stewardship that made the City's NCCP Preserve possible. Proposed improvements are oriented to the dramatic views of the Preserve and coast that are experienced from its bluff edge. ABALONE COVE Abalone Cove is one area of the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast from which direct access to the ocean, as well as access to the Preserve trails, can be made. Thus, this site is identified as a gateway to nature, on land and at sea, with an enhanced bluff pathway, overlook and picnic areas envisioned. Four Key Sites L% UPPtR1O1NI VICtN(E O LOWER POINT VICENTE O ABALONE COVE V DEL CERRO PARK UPDATED -luly22,2015 KEY SITES 1 3-1 124 Upper Point Vicente Existing Conditions � _ o 3-2 I KEY SITES UPPER POINT VICENTE This site is zoned Open Space Recreation. Designated as Point Vicente Park/Civic Center, the site turas formerly a Nike Missile Base, and presently includes and surrounds the City's civic center complex. Existing facilities are housed informer school buildings and temporary buildings. The surrounding grounds are improved with a sand volleyball court, tennis court, open grass areas, a picnic table and barbecue. With spectacular views of the ocean and Catalina Island, this site is the location of community gatherings such as the City's annual July 4th Independence Day Celebration.The site encompasses 22 acres and abuts a 4 arse Coast Guard parcel to the west. It is otherwise surrounded by Preserve lands that wrap around the site to Palos Verdes Drive. A farming operation exists on the southern facing slope below the site, which is operated in a lease agreement. Nearly 27,500 square feet of building area is currently developed on the site, including the City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall offices, studio facilities for PV On the Net, and temporary modular buildings for the PV Seniors. The City Maintenance Yard is also located on the site. There are 88 existing paved parking spaces provided on-site. The site also incorporates a helipad used by emergency services providers. As a result of the public Vision Plan process, and discussion with City staff and elected leadership, the following goals have been established for the concept design for this site: Advance the conceptual design ofthe Upper Point Vicente site based on the modlfied'Civic Center Conceptual Site Plan' (as. presented to. the City Council April 18, 2006, and included in the Appendix to this document) The site shall be able to accommodate an Arts/ Cultural Center, City Council Chamber and City Hall, a pool/gymnasium complex, a village green, centralized parking and an amphitheater, Ensure that the Civic Center is connected by a network of high quality, vibrant public landscapes and is visually integrated into the surrounding Preserve land Link Upper Point Vicente into the City's trail system and to other major destinations in the City Implement an integrated, context sensitive approach to access and parking for all users SITE CONCEPT PLAN History The concept plan for this site has evolved througiout this Vision Plan process. The site was originally the study of the City's Open Space-fask Force, which produced a plan incorporating a wide range of community and recreational uses.This plan was considered in this Vision Plan process, however, direction was provided by the Rancho Palos Verdas City Manager to include a narrow range of uses in this concept plan,This approach was endorsed by the City Council during the public Vision Plan process. Ite-ations were considered, and interested site user groupswere interviewed. Finally, a phased approach to implement the concept design was proposed, and is described below and illustrated to the right. Phased Approach The concept design depicts a phased, short-, medium-, UPDATED - July 22, 2015 125 CP UU H 1City Buildings 4 [_ 5 L _ 2 Primary City Parking Lot 3 Underutilized Open Space 5 4 Maintenance Yard 5 Underground Missile Silo /. H Helipad CP Coast Guard Properly Existing Conditions Plan f-- _ CP Cit/ Buildings _ Primary City Parking Lot 3 Improved Open,",puce 4 Expanded Open Spa - 5 Underground missile silo 6 Relocated Maintenance Yard Picnic Pod ® Trail Head H Helipad CP Coast Guard Property Upper Point Vicente Concept Plan and Phasings 2 3 �.. 6 vmrf-----� 4 A r. S _��✓� ir,, I \ j short em, Plan CPJ I s r 6 00 1 nlew City Hall \ 1 s 2 New City surface Parking Loi \ \ + 3 Village G'resn 4 Community Center \\ i'viS�rr* �� 5 Cultural Center t i_onp Term Pion 6 Plow Utes with consolidated paPeu IN Troll Head --L — H Helipad CP Coast Guard Property KEY SITES I 3-3 126 6 6 4 CP \, 3 I 6 �� 7 s H _ , �1 I City Buildings \\ �� c "' `M" ^_ Prim Primary City Parking Lot - _ _ 3 Village Green 4Communily Center -� 5 Cultural Center \ ,. / • Mid Term Plon 6 Surface Porl ing 7 Pelocoted Maintenance Yard I&Troll Head �— H Helipad CP Coast Guard Property UPDATED — July 22, 2015 _ CP Cit/ Buildings _ Primary City Parking Lot 3 Improved Open,",puce 4 Expanded Open Spa - 5 Underground missile silo 6 Relocated Maintenance Yard Picnic Pod ® Trail Head H Helipad CP Coast Guard Property Upper Point Vicente Concept Plan and Phasings 2 3 �.. 6 vmrf-----� 4 A r. S _��✓� ir,, I \ j short em, Plan CPJ I s r 6 00 1 nlew City Hall \ 1 s 2 New City surface Parking Loi \ \ + 3 Village G'resn 4 Community Center \\ i'viS�rr* �� 5 Cultural Center t i_onp Term Pion 6 Plow Utes with consolidated paPeu IN Troll Head --L — H Helipad CP Coast Guard Property KEY SITES I 3-3 126 The Village Green at tipper Paint Vicente. Existing (1) and Proposed (2) 3-4 I KEY SITES and long-term approach to the site development. In the short-term, positive impact would result from simply moving the Maintenance Yard (shown at 80,000 sf) to the east, and creating a consolidated open space area in the center ofthe site. At this early stage, a trailhead serving the adjacent Preserve trails could also be added, together with trail connections and associated picnic areas around the bluff edge of the site. In the medium-term, a Village Green (depicted at 1.7 acres in size), which could also accommodate an amphitheater [3), Veteran's Memorial and/or public art, as well as the City's 4th of July celebration, might be created, together with a cultural center (shown at 30,000 sf on two levels) which could host activities relating to the arts including studio and gallery space, class and performance space, both indoors and outdoors; a community center complex (shown at 20,000 sf on two levels), which might accommodate meeting space for community groups, recreational facilities, classroom space and a full sized recreational pool (50m x 25m). In the long-term,a City Hall complex (shown at 36,000 sf on two levels) could be developed, incorporating administrative facilities and a Council Chamber. Further, the City's Maintenance Yard could be relocated off site, freeing space for other open space or developed uses. Ai this stage consolidated parking could be developed, in a structure partially below grade, which might enable additional open space or other site uses, including areas for active recreation, to be created. Maintaining the Site Character Though this site is one of three within theVision Plan identified to accommodate new public uses within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, the vision statement and goals developed for this Plan, as well as the design guidance material included in Chapter 5 of this document, clearly recommend open space aid view preservation within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, as well as context sensitive building and site design. Ultimately, at each phase of concept design implementation, the site should retain its park like setting and precious ocean views, and provide access into the adjoining Preserve trail system. Recommendations for Implementation • Initiate a formal master plan ofthe site, incluoing market analysis relating to potential arts and recreation facilities, a space program to serve a range of possible uses and user groups, a parking. needs analysis related to the potential users, and incorporatethe utility study presently be ng undertaken for the site. • Immediately pursue funding sources (grants, 2tc.) to implement the on-site trailhead and trail connections on site, as well as to relocate and reconfigure the City's Maintenance Yard. Research potential off-site locations suitable for the City's maintenance yard UPDATED - July 22, 2013 127 LOWER POINT VICENTE The Lower Point Vicente site is zoned Open Space Recreation and is identified for passive recreation in the City's General Plan. The 20.5 acre site incorporates the Point Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC), at 10,000 sf of developed building area, and 13,000 sf of hardscaped plazas and outdoor amphitheater area. The Interpretive Center is focused on the coastal setting, marine life and history of the Peninsula, and since its expansion, also serves as a destination for community functions, such as meetings, weddings and parties. The Interpretive Center continues its tradition of hosting the annual Whale of a Day celebration as well. The adjacent Point Vicente Lighthouse is presently closed to the public and home to Coast Guard personnel. The lighthouse itself is periodically open for tours, and Coast Guard related exhibits and activities are integrated into the Whale of a Day event as well. A pathway (Interpretive Trail) that is part of the City's segment of the California Coast Trail adjacent to the Vicente Bluffs Reserve, is located along the bluff edge of the site. This pathway connects into the Ocean Front Estates bluff - front trail system via a bridge over the storm drain at the northern edge of the site, and to the south it connects to the pathway along Palos Verdes Drive South, leading to Pelican Cove and the Terranea Resort. UPDATED - July 22, 2015 F' IiM'10711M During continued community visioning for the Lower Point Vicente site, the following goals were established for the concept design for this site: Integrate the open space areas around the Interpretive Center into a cohesive vision for publically-accessible areas for passive recreation in a manner that is sensitive to coastal habitats as well as to existing uses within and adjacent to the site. Implement an integrated approach to access and parking for all users. Determine broad site design and program possibilities for publicly accessible space at the Lighthouse property, should the City obtain permission to this land via the Coast Guard. Lower Point Vicente Existing Conditions r J3f� C owdghi (C;I 2002=2008 Ke—eth Z.. ,abdelle Asielcon, Cnlltrrr'o C"C"T.1 Records KEY SITES I „-„ 128 Lower Point Vicente Concept Pian (R—i—d 07 22.2015) , E fes-- N1, , o 4 ( rt �S\ 3-6 I KEY SITES SITE CONCEPT PLAN As a result of the Vision Plan process a Community Focus Committee representing various stakeholders including a Council member, was assembled to continue to develop the vision for Lower Point Vicente. This Committee drafted a concept for the site that incorporated public feedback and synthesized ideas previously presented into one holistic idea for the site. The concept design for this site shown at left, has been extrapolated from this process and depicts the potential for: Maintaining PVIC-The existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center. Improving Parking and Vehicular Access - Parking, driveways and drop off areas should be provided in order to serve all site uses.The concept plan includes parking areas to accommodate approximately 150 vehicles, drop off and loading. The parking areas are Portions of the trails should be designed to be accessible to visitors with disabilities. Open space and picnic areas are to be planted with native and locally appropriate vegetation. See the Appendix for site planting recommendations. Plant selection should be done carefully with the existing animal habitatsin mind. See Chapter S for recommended site furnishings. Fuel modification - appropriate vegetation along northern property line. A bioswale is included along the north side ofthe site and through the parking area(s) This naturalized feature would help capture and filter stormwater runoff, as well as provide habitat The hioswale would need to be studied and engineered in later phases. In addition, a habitat corridor can be studied for inclusion through the sitefor nesting birds and animals. envisioned as permeably -paved and can incorporate Care should be taken to avoid negative impact an the site's bio-swales between parking aisles in order to soften neighbors as well as drivers and cyclists along the adjacent the environmental impact of the hardscaped parking roadway, through sound -mitigation, preservation of site ares via stormwater filtration and capture runofffrom lines, and related design strategies. A buffet of at least other areas on site. 1 S feet should be maintained between trails and private 6 properties to the north, if included on the site, educational Assuring Pedestrian Access - A pedestrian portal and stations should be located so as to reduce noise that could trailhead along Palos Verdes Drive West at the north s� YEY: on site should be carefully located with sight -lines in mind new open space areas. Likewise the trail network both from adjacent properties and from Palos Verdes Drive 1. F'.nl V r,.�nY If'te C'rC-tlVe - City's local Coastal Plan. a larger more -regional connection, since this trail is part 'i of the City's segment of the California Coast Trail. New 2. Parking Lot • ith 3ioswoles across vehicular accessways are also introduced. s. 4. Pect,cnrr e S. 0-ticxAs 6. n r",_a. (to be placed throu 7hou'i -* -- -- - ria 1r51 m o a a e c rdor'/lryl Fi ry aI and Ad _lc-ni Habitof PultY r —___ frc;perty Linc F'r:COrfnl`ndJ(i SF: porOiion bJ l✓lePn . ar,3 c>r<:ap,? r /line: 150 f t min. 3-6 I KEY SITES SITE CONCEPT PLAN As a result of the Vision Plan process a Community Focus Committee representing various stakeholders including a Council member, was assembled to continue to develop the vision for Lower Point Vicente. This Committee drafted a concept for the site that incorporated public feedback and synthesized ideas previously presented into one holistic idea for the site. The concept design for this site shown at left, has been extrapolated from this process and depicts the potential for: Maintaining PVIC-The existing Point Vicente Interpretive Center. Improving Parking and Vehicular Access - Parking, driveways and drop off areas should be provided in order to serve all site uses.The concept plan includes parking areas to accommodate approximately 150 vehicles, drop off and loading. The parking areas are Portions of the trails should be designed to be accessible to visitors with disabilities. Open space and picnic areas are to be planted with native and locally appropriate vegetation. See the Appendix for site planting recommendations. Plant selection should be done carefully with the existing animal habitatsin mind. See Chapter S for recommended site furnishings. Fuel modification - appropriate vegetation along northern property line. A bioswale is included along the north side ofthe site and through the parking area(s) This naturalized feature would help capture and filter stormwater runoff, as well as provide habitat The hioswale would need to be studied and engineered in later phases. In addition, a habitat corridor can be studied for inclusion through the sitefor nesting birds and animals. envisioned as permeably -paved and can incorporate Care should be taken to avoid negative impact an the site's bio-swales between parking aisles in order to soften neighbors as well as drivers and cyclists along the adjacent the environmental impact of the hardscaped parking roadway, through sound -mitigation, preservation of site ares via stormwater filtration and capture runofffrom lines, and related design strategies. A buffet of at least other areas on site. 1 S feet should be maintained between trails and private properties to the north, if included on the site, educational Assuring Pedestrian Access - A pedestrian portal and stations should be located so as to reduce noise that could trailhead along Palos Verdes Drive West at the north carry over to neighboring properties. Any trees olanted side of the site allows for pedestrian access into the on site should be carefully located with sight -lines in mind new open space areas. Likewise the trail network both from adjacent properties and from Palos Verdes Drive connects through the site to the Seascape Trail and the West, consistent with the visual corridors identified in the Point Vicente Lighthouse, along the bluff encouraging City's local Coastal Plan. a larger more -regional connection, since this trail is part of the City's segment of the California Coast Trail. New crosswalks for pedestrians that Ii k trails and connect across vehicular accessways are also introduced. Formalizing Open Space and Trail Networks - A new trailhead and trail system encompassing an enhanced existing bluff -front trail, as well as new connections through and around the site inland would open access across the site, connect to the Preserve trail system, and extend toward the bluff and the Upper PointVicente site. UPDATED - July 22, 2015 129 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION The improvements identified as part of the vision plan can be phased over time. The priority for improvements are the new trail network and open space enhancements. The following list outlines the recommended steps for full implementation: • Improve runoff and erosion control as necessary and address other first order needs relating to safety, natural conditions, and the visitor experience. Perform existing -conditions studies or survey needed. • Complete detailed design of the open space areas, trail network, bioswale, etc. Implementation of Phase 7 improvements to include: new trail network, restored plantings and habitat, grassland area, trail overlooks and trailheads, trail markers, park furnishings, and bioswale(s). • Implementation of Phase 2 improvements to include new parking areas. s ' � UPDATED - July 22, 2015 Sluff Side Trail at Lower Point Vicente Existing (1) and Propu,c� (2) 0 KEY SITES I 3-7 130 Aooa one wove E OsPv + ,ye"•i^:;; s. Abalone Cove Concept Pian 2 6 f $* -, 5 � .In prcra ire c, kn;u i 3 E'zist;ng psrking Ipi 5 E,:}iarg buldi,o to —,ah c Accessibl.:, troll f,ta n;eet ADA requirements) 7 Ent:y Slgnoge & Proposed O'rerlpck 9 Prop—ed T dl H—d Trails Er.s!ing a d I rp,od 0 3-8 I KEY SITES ABALONE COVE Abalone Cove Shoreline Park features two beaches (Abalone Cove and Sacred Cove), tide pools, bluf= top viewing areas, restrooms, and a network of trails, accessible from a controlled, for fee,1S0 space parking lot off Palos Verdes Drive South. The park is partially designated as a State Ecological Preserve and taking of protected animals and marine life is prohibited. Access to Abalone Cove Beach is by a trail from the parking lot. SITE GOALS As a result of the public Vision Plan process, and discussion with City staff and elected leadership, the following goals have been established for the concept design for this site: Add new park amenities- picnic tables, shade features, benches, trash receptacles; and an ADA accessible bluff top trail and trail signage Implement an invasive species removal and low profile shade tree planting program within the park SITE CONCEPT PLAN The concept design presented for Abalone Cove seeks to enhance access and aesthetics at one ofthe most visible City park sites along the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. However, it describes minimal change to the site, including adding an ADA accessible trail looping the top of the bluff area, adding an overlook at the bluff edge of the Park, selectively replanting the site with native vegetation, and adding shade (likely only small native trees) for the picnic areas. UPDATED - July 22, 2015 131 Signage marking trail connections and/or beach access is also a part of this concept. Further, interpretive signage could also be added at this location, though given that the roadway pull out/ parking area and signage are already located here, this is not a likely to be a high priority for the City. Instead, better connection should be made between the site itself and the trails, and the interpretive signage area. No change is contemplated relating to the trails from the bluff to the ocean. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION Pursue public/private partnerships and/or grant funding to implement the trail, trailhead, signage, picnic area and revegetation projects proposed at Abalone Cove UPDATED - July 22, 2015 Trail Head at Abalone Cove Existing (1) and Proposed (2) KEY SITES 1 3-9 132 Dei Cerro Park Existing Conditions 3-10 1 KEY SITES DEL CERRO PARK The 4.5 acre Del Cerro Park site is designated Open Space Recreation in the City's Zoning Code. The site features panoramic views of canyons, coastal headlands, ocean and offshore islands. The site presently consists of an open play area and a small on-site parking area consisting of 17 marked parking spaces as well assome parallel spaces on the access road. Access to the Preserve trail system is adjacent to the park, but not directly from it. Parking to serve the Preserve trail system presently occurs on the adjacent streets. SITE GOALS: Establish Del Cerro Park as a donor recognition site educating the public about the origins of the Preserve, and include an area in which to view the Preserve and its facilities Augment and improve existing visitor facilities and provide an ADA accessible path to a Preserve overlook Improve signage relating to the Preserve and its trails at Del Cerro Park UPDATED - July 22, 2015 133 SITE CONCEPT PLAN This Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy (PVPLC) donor recognition site at Del Cerro Park was conceptually approved by the City Council in concert with the approval of the Preserve itself in 2005. The existing parking lot at the Park is intended to remain, but to be upgraded to accommodate ADA access. As shown in the concept design on the next page the pathway from the parking area up to the Donor Recognition overlook will begin at the northern end of the parking area, and terminate at the overlook at the top of the bluff. Neither the pathway, nor the entry signage introducing the Conservancy and the overlook at the start of the path will intrude on the open play area of the park. The pathway location has been dictated by the constraints ofthe site's grades, and the need to ensure ADA accessibility. Instead of providing a loop trail, in an initial phase of construction, a single path up to and back from the overlook will be provided. One overlook will be constructed in the general vicinity ofthe existing bench already at the overlook. Overlook walls will be 36" high or less, with integrated signage. Bench seating and stone banding will be used in the overlook as well. The design does not incorporate lighting or planting. The initial overlook, and any second overlook and trail extension (creating a loop) which may be added in the future, will be sited in order to avoid conflicting with the areas of the site required to remain clear for emergency fire access, as well as to the landing zone required by the model airplane"silent flyers"who presently use the site, as is feasible, and to avoid impacts on the open areas ofthe park itself and the neighboring residences. UPDATED -July 22, 2015 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION: Should the City wish to pursue additional site improvements in the future, a restroom building may be contemplated on the site, and sited so that it provides the least possible impact to the surrounding neighborhood, but is accessible to and serves, park and Preserve trail users Engage PVPLC to further enhance the site by implementing native planting at its upper bluff edge, should funding be identified NOTE: In the future, any specific projects approved on any of the key sites included in this Vision Plan, will be subject to a site specific City -directed approval plan review and approval process.This process will result in appropriate conditions of approval relating to the direction set in this key sites chapter, as well as the provisions ofthe Design Guidance included in Chapter S of this Vision Plan relating to Siting and Site Design, Buildings and Architectural Site Features, and Design Palette, and the Plant Palette Guidance provided in the Appendix to this document. 1 Existing Driveway - 2 EAsting Parking Loi 3 Existing Open Space 4'0/elcome Wall 7 ' .5 Decarnposed Granite ADA Poihway /(��.. h cverlE,10, oY ,(; i Existing Vegeialian � 4LSS�r` 2 7" J 4 3 5, �. 6 6 L FA Del Cerro Park Concept Plan A KEY SITES 13-1 ' 134 CONNECTIONS The Vision for the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast recognizes the special role that each unique place plays within the whole system, and seeks a unified look and feel for all of the areas in terms of design character and materials. Further, the Vision addresses a network of connections between the different areas and elements within the coastline, including the key sites, Preserve, parklands, and other coastal destinations. This Connections chapter of the Vision Plan identifies key roads, trails and bikeways within the area, as well as modifications and improvements to them. These elements are mapped on the plan on the following page, and their future character is described and illustrated, together with improvements that serve not only cars and transit vehicles, but also bicycles and pedestrians. Further, this chapter identifies the "stops along the way,"the amenity areas, trailheads, overlooks, vista points, and rest areas which will serve people experiencing the Rancho Palos Verdes the Coast. Of course, given the geography of this area, efforts will focus on Palos Verdes Drive (west and south), visualized in the future at right. GOALS As a result of the public Vision Plan process, and discussion with City staff and elected leadership, the following goals have been established relating to connections within the Vision Plan. The elements referred to in these goals, which make up the network of connections within the Vision Plan area, are also identified on the map on the following page: Develop the Preserve trail system identified in the City's Public Use Master Plan for the NCCP Develop an integrated, recognizable system of vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit or shuttle links to major coastal sites, destinations, and amenities within the City Create stronger physical linkages between the Upper and lower PointVicente sites, as well as between Preserve land and public open space and activity areas on the inland and the coastal sides of Palos Verdes Drive Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to key sites, trailheads and destinations along Palos Verdes Drive and at access points into the Preserve Develop a continuous, marked Coastal Access Trail alignment within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast Ensure that connections are ADA accessible, while using permeable paving materials where possible, only incorporating impermeable materials where traffic and level of use prohibit alternatives STRENGTHENING THE BACKBONE OF THE COAST -PALOS VERDES DRIVE Palos Verdes Drive serves as the spine or backbone of the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, linking the key sites, destinations, preserve and parklands. While this road must serve the automobile traffic it accommodates and the adjacent neighborhoods, it must also be a place that visually represents the character and quality of the vision for the environment within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, and be comfortable for people and bikes. Therefore, a continuous pedestrian and bicycle linkage should ultimately be developed along Palos Verdes Drive for the entire length of the City's coastline. This will help complete the City's Coastal Access Trail system, and provide a safe and comfortable connection along the bluffs and at access points down to the shoreline.This linkage should be off-street where possible. Palos Verdes Drive Improvements. Existing (1) and Proposed (2) UPDATED - July 22, 2015 CONNECTIONS 1 4-1 135 Connections Map - `� �� • m t . UPPER PONTVKENIE•'� .� LOWER POINT _ VICENTE •�• - Pons Fuww,' `KH.TE UFA ' LEGEND ACCESS AND CONNECTIONS a.Am ROADS ' For bob,, idormo6a, r•g,,&N Polos Verdes Loop TmII end Coepol Aaese Tmii sx PAlk Use Mostar hen. TRAILS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED)" o' Fume Pr.—Acganuon: C,y«Pmdw Pebr verbs!„, sigmd Pachase agmemem ,o xq,4e tFw Upper Fil�num prarany is TRAILHEADS -t- COASTAL ACCESS TRAIL - PROPOSED ROUTE rZ7s PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS �J (POSSIBLE NEW SIGNALS OR SMART CROSSWALKS) GATEWAY TO RANCHO PALOS VERDES COAST ROADWAY MEDIAN PLANTING IMPROVEMENTS 00 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT AREA 0 POSSIBLE FUTURE ROAD NARROWING BIKEWAYS [SHARED AND SEPARATED[ 4-2 1 CONNECTIONS �� y 'DEL CE -O PARK ( 1. 5 Edges Where this condition does not exist now, the edges of Palos Verdes Drive should be enhanced with pedestrian pathways, which could be City standard sidewalks, or where appropriate permeable paving, such as stabilized decomposed granite, in keeping with the coastal area's natural character. Pedestrians should be separated from the roadway where the right-of-way is most constrained, by using attractive barriers, or edge/ parkway planting. Providing a continuous, marked bikeway along Palos Verdes Drive is another measure which will enhance both bike safety, and provide greater separation between the roadway edge and cars in the roadway. These concepts are visualized on the following page, Further, as the trailhead project adjacent to Forrestall Drive and Ladera Linda Community Center is implemented, reconfiguration of that obsolete asphalt UPDATED - July 22, 2015 136 Roadway Width A goal of this plan is to balance the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists with automobiles in the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, and to reduce speeds on the roadway, and control traffic noise. To this end, in one segment of Palos Verdes Drive, roadway narrowing to two travel lanes should be considered. Narrowing one segment of the road, between Seacove, and the southern end of Abalone Cove, would simply extend - the already narrower, two-lane portion of the road six tenths of a mile north. It would also provide an ;t opportunity to widen sidewalks for pedestrians along the Abalone Cove frontage, and enhance plantings there, given that this is spark -edged area in which the � bluff is wide, and an area in which a future trail from the Preserve may some dayjoin Palos Verdes Drive. Further, as the trailhead project adjacent to Forrestall Drive and Ladera Linda Community Center is implemented, reconfiguration of that obsolete asphalt UPDATED - July 22, 2015 136 roadway should be considered in order to narrow it and add the improvements described in the Improving the Trail Network section below. Intersections/Crossings Palos Verdes Drive intersections at Hawthorne and Terranea are now signalized and have crosswalks. The intersection at Forrestal and Palos Verdes Drive is also identified for future signalization. Enhancing these intersections further for pedestrians might simply include providing enhanced crosswalk paving, ensuring that signals are pedestrian actuated smart signals, or, where feasible, extending the curbs at intersections or providing median island refuges in the center of the roadway, in order to shorten crossing distances for pedestrians, and further protect them from automobile traffic. At two locations on Palos Verdes Drive near Klondike Canyon and between Hawthorne and the entrance to PVIC, pedestrian smart crossings are proposed. This concept is visualized on page 4-1, and includes enhanced crosswalk paving and overhead pedestrian signal lights, which can be actuated by pedestrians themselves. In -pavement flashers, such as those used in crossings to the south of the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, in San Pedro, may also be considered, in consultation with the City's Traffic Engineer. Upon further study, it may also be determined that full signalization is required at the entrance near Klondike Canyon. Medians Adding median plantings on Palos Verdes Drive, in identified segments now lacking planting, or in areas with planting which may need to be adjusted to focus more on materials that are native and coastal in character, will improve and further soften the visual character of the road. When working in tandem with roadway grading so that water runoff drains to the center, planted medians can also provide areas for stormwater capture and cleansing. Further, enhancing the median on Hawthorne Boulevard in the segment approaching Upper Point Vicente will provide an improved and greener gateway into the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, particularly when coupled with overlook improvements at the edge of the roadway that take advantage of coastal views, as shown in the visualization on page 4-5 of this chapter. IMPROVING THE TRAIL NETWORK The Connections Plan depicts PUMP trails within the Preserve, some of which exist now, and some of which will be constructed in the future. In addition to these alignments, the Plan identifies trail segments within the key sites themselves, providing connections to PUMP trails and connecting, in the case of Upper and Lower Point Vicente, one key site to another. The Plan also identifies an alignment for the California Coastal Trail (Coastal Access Trail), which, when implemented and identified with signage, would complete the Rancho Palos Verdes coast segment of this key recreational facility that has been envisioned and championed by the Coastal Conservancy. In addition to the Preserve and Non -Preserve trails, there are missing linkages between these trail facilities, which, if filled, will improve the connectivity of the City's trail system as well. These missing, or under improved linkages again include the Forrestal Preserve access roadway. A trailhead project is already planned in this area, near the entry gate to the Preserve located on Forrestal Drive adjacent to the Ladera Linda Community Center. This project will include trailhead, improvements but should also be coupled with roadway improvements in order to focus more on the pedestrian, and less on the automobile. Palos Verdes Drive - Sidewalk and Bikeway Improvements (1) and Road Narrowing Opportunity (2 lanes to 1) (2) UPDATED - July 22, 2015 CONNECTIONS I 4-3 137 A, Permeable Fad E Bench C. Trash Receptacle / Recycling Carfainer D Tra (head Sign or Freestanding Kiosk E Small Nalive Trees F Pockets is of Native Shrubs G Informal sealing on boulders N Trail trio Preserve A. Circular Permeable Pod with Flush Stone Edging B Semi -circular Bench C Stone Pilaster D Stone Clad Retaining Wall (<2'1 it necessary E Pockets of Native Shrubs F Semi -Circular Permeable Pad with Flush Stone Edging G Trail through Preserve 4-4 I CONNECTIONS 51 E D A F B GIS C gal j' C U Roadway planting and continuous sidewalks of either City standard or permeable materials, as traffic calming interventions such as curb extensions planted with native trees could be added as well, and could also serve as stormwater management tools. This project should focus on better balancing the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and automobiles, and adding environmental benefits, as it accommodates both sports field and trail user access. PLACES FOR PEOPLE ALONG THE WAY Places have been identified in this Vision Plan in which users of the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast can find respite along the coastline. These include rest areas, trailheads, overlooks, and vista points. Goals for these amenity areas have been established, as follows: Rest areas are to be provided at key sites and adjacent to the Preserve in order to serve as high quality points of entry into the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast Vision Plan areas and support and enhance their use and educational value A range of users'parking needs, including residents, visitors, and trail users, should be met in these areas A consistent character of design shall be maintained in these areas which is unobtrusive and in harmony with surroundings In siting rest areas, impacts must be minimized on sensitive areas nearby Rest area and facility design must contribute to the sustainability of the community In general, rest areas have been identified as part of several of the key sites within the Plan, as well as adjacent to or part of key coastal destinations. Trailheads have been located at key entrances to the Preserve, both within key sites, and at other locations, as shown on the Plan on the previous page. Overlooks and vista points will be developed by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy, as part of their donor recognition program, and are located at key view points approved by the City Council for this type of amenity. Rest Areas Several rest areas are identified on the plan in this chapter. Some of these areas already exist, some will soon be redesigned and expanded, such as the Fishing Access adjacent toTerranea, and some have yet to be developed. Rest areas are typically within or adjacent to key sites or destinations and serve visitors to, and users of, the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast: They provide access to parking, restrooms, drinking fountains, trash, recycling, and bike racks. While these areas are intended to provide supporting services and respite, they also provide another opportunity to touch users with educational and interpretive materials. While myriad themes could emerge during the implementation of this Vision, a few ideas are suggested here. At the Fishing Access [t], which will be redesigned and expanded as part of the Terranea Resort project, educational signage may be provided about the California Coastal National Monument At Abalone Cove, when improvements are made to the bluff top areas of the park, additional interpretive materials could be provided about the historic whaling station on the coast At visitor support areas adjacent to the Trump National Golf Club [2], interpretive materials relating to the halfway point ofthe Peninsula Loop could be provided UPDATED - July 22, 2015 138 At Upper Point Vicente, the cold war heritage of the site, embodied in the Nike missile silos could lend itself to coastal military history interpretation Finally, at Lower Point Vicente, there may be information about the California Coastal Access Trail, a segment of which traverses the bluff frontage of the site Design elements proposed at the trailheads, overlooks and vista points are described below. Specific signage and furnishings referenced below can be found in Chapter 5 of this document, Design Guidance. Trailheads Major trailheads [3] will be located at key entrances into the Preserve. They are located within a widened area of the trail at its start, with a decomposed granite, gravel or bark mulch (i.e. permeable surface) pad. Furnishings at major trailheads include a bench, plastic bag kiosk for dog owners, and trash and recycling receptacles. Signage will include a Trailhead Sign or possibly a freestanding kiosk for trail notices. Small native trees for shade, as well as plant pockets of native shrubs, where appropriate, are also envisioned in these locations. Minor trailheads [4] will be located at less frequently used entrances to the Preserve. They are located within a widened area of the trail at its start, with a decomposed permeable pad. Furnishings at minor trailheads include plastic bag kiosk for dog owners, and optionally, informal seating on boulders. Signage will include a Trailhead Sign. Plant pockets of native shrubs, where appropriate, are also envisioned in these locations. Overlooks Overlooks [5] are located in approved locations within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, either within Preserve lands or on public lands, and are part of the donor recognition program administered by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy. Overlooks are to be placed on a decomposed granite, or other permeable material, pad, with flush stone edging. Furnishings at overlooks are to include a semicircle bench as well as a stone pilaster displaying the name of the donor being recognized. A stone clad retaining wall, less than 3 feet in height, may also be incorporated into the overlook as necessary. Plant pockets of native shrubs are also envisioned edging the overlook pad. Vista Points Vista points [6] are located in Council approved locations within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, either within Preserve lands or on public lands, and are part of the donor recognition program administered by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy. They are to include a decomposed granite pad with flush stone edging, a semicircle bench together with a stone pilaster displaying the name of the donor being recognized. Plant pockets of native shrubs are also envisioned edging the vista point. An Overlook on Hawthorne Boulevard. Existing (n and Proposed (8) UPDATED - July 22, 2015 CONNECTIONS 1 4-5 139 ........ . . . . . . . . . . 6 141 INTRODUCTION The design guidance contained in this chapter seeks to establish a basic foundation and key standards for implementing the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast vision. The design guidance will be considered over an extended period of time as a long-term implementation strategy that will consist of a detailed design and an approval review process. The goal is for all of the built components of the Coast, over time, to complement each other resulting in a cohesive look and feel for the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. This guidance addresses the design of the key sites and future buildings, as well as provides a design palette to guide hardscape, planting, furnishings, signage and wayfinding, lighting, and amenities. While this material has been developed specifically with the Vision Plan area in mind, ultimately, overtime, this design guidance could influence site design principles, signage, identity, furnishings, and sustainability, approaches within the public realm of the whole city. The principles which underlie the design guidance include respect for the natural landscape, harmony with the environment, sensitivity to context, authenticity, timeless style, and appropriate scale and materials. SITE DESIGN GOALS Respect and use the natural slope and character of key sites Be sensitive of neighbors' views to key sites, and maximize views from them Capitalize on the natural setting of Rancho Palos Verdes, and take the indoors outdoors by spilling interior space onto walkways and public open spaces. Bring the outdoors into buildings by opening interior spaces (e.g. atria) to views and natural light Ensure that site design is integrated and serves the whole system of the community, in terms of program, user needs, context, and sustainability Preserve and enhance the environmental quality of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes as well as the marine ecosystems along its coastline. Develop key sites and on-site parking in an environmentally sustainable manner Maintain the City's water resources by capturing and maximizing the use of rainwater and sensitively managing urban runoff CHARACTERISTICS Building Siting A campus configuration, in which uses are spread among more intimately scaled buildings, should be considered as an alternative to developing multiple uses in single large buildings [1] The open character of key sites, and the public access to views of, and trails to, the coast, must be retained Preserve and incorporate view corridors in all City development efforts and planning [2] Minimize the cut and fill required in site grading [3] Retain existing, mature and native vegetation [5] Buildings should be designed to be low in profile, natural in color and tone, and varied in facade and massing, particularly on prominent hillsides and ridgelines, within viewsheds [4] [5] Consider and take advantage of the solar orientation of building sites [6] APPROVED - September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE I 142 5-2 I DESIGN GUIDANCE PUBLIC GATHERING AREAS Buildings on key sites will be connected to their context by vibrant public spaces in which the community can gather, and which evoke the natural context in their materials, planting and furnishings. Public gathering areas, as part of development on key sites. should have the following characteristics: Incorporate on-site public open space with ample and comfortable sitting space [2] [3] [5], buffering from adjacent uses for safety 11 ] [3], spatial definition by surrounding buildings, combinations of sun and shade [1] [3], and focal points or amenities of interest [4] [5] Locate and design public open space where it is visible and easily accessible from public areas (building entrances, sidewalks) APPROVED - September 2, 2008 143 PARKING AND CIRCULATION All key sites within the Vision Plan area must be accessible, therefore on site roadways and parking areas are unavoidable. However, these areas should not dominate the sites, and should balance the needs of those arriving by automobile, on foot or by bicycle with the natural setting of the site. As part of development of key sites, parking and circulation areas should have the following characteristics: New parking lots at the Vision Plan key sites should be permeable or be designed in such a way that storm water runoff on site can be collected and allowed to infiltrate back into the soil on site [7] [b] Minimize the introduction of traditional curb and gutter systems into new parking areas by using flush conditions wherever possible [2] [3] Minimize the visual impact of parking by buffering surface lots with significant landscaping, Consider consolidating parking where practical, into well- designed low visual and environmental impact structures [5] Minimize the widths of internal roadways on key sites in order to minimize the footprint relating to circulation. Incorporate permeable materials into roadway design as well [5] Make pedestrian connectivity and circulation on sites a priority and an integral part of the initial site layout. Pedestrian routes should be direct and should minimize potential conflicts with vehicles. Safe and comfortable pedestrian circulation should be provided through parking areas. When pathways cross internal site driveways, provide a highly visible crosswalk. Also use warning signs and light fixtures to alert drivers to crossings [5] Bikes and bicyclists' needs should be met. Bike racks should be located close to the main building entrances) so that they are highly visible and convenient [4] Am - APPROVED - September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE 1 5-3 144 5-4 I DESIGN GUIDANCE M — a, WATER MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION Sustainability considerations should figure prominently in the design of any new development within the Vision Plan area. Stormwater capture and use, and water management on sites is a specific area of concern. Southern California boasts a Mediterranean climate with less rain than other parts of the country, so it is critical that we capture, cleanse and use this precious resource mindfully. The following issues should be considered in key site design: Act as stewards of the City's water resources by capturing and maximizing the reuse of rainwater and sensitively managing urban water runoff Develop integrated Stormwater Management strategies for every site as part of any detailed site design. Seek to increase or maintain the extent of pervious surfaces on sites, through which water ran percolate. Bioswales [3] and bioretention areas [2], stormwater planters/roof drain systems [l], green roofs [4] and rain gardens [5] should be considered as part of any holistic storm water management strategy APPROVED - September 2, 2008 145 BUILDINGS AND ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES CHARACTERISTICS DESIGN The design guidance for buildings focuses not on architectural style, but on other defining elements such as scale, mass, configuration, materials and color and building elements. The imagery on these pages depicts both historically relevant examples of good design, and modern reinterpretations of those positive design elements. Both are important design features to consider, as projects are reviewed and approved in the future. GOALS Fit buildings to the site and the existing contours of the land Encourage buildings that are "made out of the environment' which effectively bring those who use and visit them into contact with nature Foster a sense of indoor -outdoor living, so appropriate in the climate and setting of Rancho Palos Verdes Support green building design contributing to the sustainability of the community. Buildings should be designed to qualify for the US Green Building Council LEED-NC certification, where appropriate Scale And Mass Ground -hugging buildings, used historically in early California architecture, and still relevant today, are most appropriate [7 ] [2] [3] Large buildings should be broken down in terms of mass. Consider human scale in building materials, which will help people relate to the size of the building. Attention should be paid to the articulation of separate volumes within building masses, which are well proportioned and related to create a pleasing composition [2] [4] New buildings should relate to existing buildings on the site in terms of scale & height APPROVED - September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE I 5-5 146 5-6 I DESIGN GUIDANCE Building Configuration Buildings should be configured on sites in order to form a complete and unified composition surrounding and enclosing outdoor space [1]. Further. buildings should not stop at the edges of their walls or rooflines, but in this climate include and frame outdoor spaces, which, as shown here, have traditionally included shade structures and courtyards [2] [5]. These historic components can be reinterpreted using modern materials creating a timeless building design [4] [6], The following issues should be considered in building configuration at key sites: Consider buildings that frame and enclose outdoor living spaces with a flow of traffic, light and air from indoors to outdoors.. .(through open plan design, cross ventilation, natural lighting etc.) Create outdoor rooms by incorporating external features such as trellis structures, courtyards and water features [3] Design each building to form part of the larger built composition of the area within which it is located APPROVED - September 2, 2008 147 Materials and Colors Consistency in building materials and colors can provide a unified direction for site design, without dictating style. The following issues should be considered relating to building materials at key sites: Buildings should be built of natural and vernacular materials — including concrete, local stone, rough natural timber, shake or tile roofs, adobe bricks, modern day board and batten siding, plaster, and tile [3] [4] Refer to elements of traditional architectural styles in the area's history: Spanish Colonial, Mission, Rancho. and California Mediterranean Use colors found in the natural environment or `earth -tones' instead of introducing exotic colors [2] [2] [5] [6] Avoid large blocks of highly reflective materials APPROVED - September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE I 5-7 5-8 I DESIGN GUIDANCE Building Architectural Elements - Historic Adaptation Going back to the Rancho roots of the area, a few architectural elements have traditionally been significant in California architecture. Acknowledging and reinterpreting these elements will keep this architectural tradition alive and vibrant in the future of the Coast. The following issues relating to building architectural elements should be considered in key site design: Deep building overhangs and covered walkways, referring to the corredor elements in early California rancho architecture, should be considered as site architectural elements [3]. They have traditionally served as outdoor living spaces, as well as provided shade and shelter from on shore breezes. These features serve as unifying elements and the connective tissue linking buildings in campus style developments together [4] The design of a building should reinterpret historically significant details rather than replicating them, such as extended roof beams [7] [2] and landscape structures [5] [6] APFROVED - September 2, 2008 149 Green Building Design The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has already demonstrated a commitment to green building, which certainly should be expressed in projects within the Coast. Green design components to consider in projects at key sites include natural ventilation, natural lighting, passive and active solar systems, grey water re -use, rainwater harvesting, use of non-toxic materials, "eco' or "green" roofs, permeable surfaces. and energy efficient systems [111 Solar Panels (Active Solar) Building Orientation Architecture (Passive Solar) (i.e. roof overhangs, window eyebrows) Greywater Collection & Reuse (i.e. cisterns,'green" roofs) Ventilation (i.e. operable windows) 0 Sustainable Materials (i.e. recycled content, locally harvested and manufactured) Healthy Interiors (i.e. low/no VOC paint, natural daylighting) Energy Efficiency (i.e. good insulation, energy-efficient appli- ances and fixtures) APPROVED - September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE I 5-9 150 k'. THE DESIGN PALETTE This section of the design guidance addresses the palette of materials suggested as appropriate for implementing in the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. HARDSCAPE The term hardscape refers to a range of site EL components from walls to structures, to paving, to trail materials. In considering hardscape and site features at key sites the following goals should guide decision making: Reinforce and enhance the character of the areas within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast by _-� — implementing a consistent, appropriate palette of hardscape materials in areas such as sidewalks, plazas, crosswalks, and roadways - J Use architectural site features and ground plane treatments to physically connect the buildings and parking areas of key sites into an integrated ® circulation system Use architectural site features and ground plane - . { treatments to visually unify key sites The following issues should be considered in hardscape design, which is intended to complement the natural setting of the Coast, and not compete with its character: 5-10 I DESIGN GUIDANCE Water features will only be considered at Upper Point Vicente and Lower Point Vicente. Water features will be encouraged to also perform a storm water management role and/or use reclaimed water Trellis or shade structures will only be considered at Upper Point Vicente and Lower Point Vicente and the Active Recreation area Low walls of stone [3] or enhanced concrete [11 ] (riot to exceed 3 -feet in height. ) may be used at Upper Point Vicente, Lower Point Vicente, Del Cerro Park, Abalone Cove, Active Recreation area and at Overlooks within the Preserve. They may be used as for retaining purposes, as seat walls or for edge demarcation purposes The aesthetic of these components is not mandated, but preference should be given to styles and materials that reference relevant historic styles and that are locally occurring Materials include, but are not limited to, natural stone (particularly Palos Verdes stone or its equivalent) [3], plain or neutral colored concrete, powder -coated metals - in earth tones, Corten steel, wood, recycled plastic Ground plane treatments include. Pavement at Upper Point Vicente and Lower Point Vicente - The aesthetic is not mandated, but designs that reference locally significant architecture, consider the natural Rancho Palos Verdes Coast landscape and utilize locally occurring material or natural themes [5] will be given preference. Storm water harvestirg should be considered when designing hardscape treatments [4] Sidewalks alone Palos Verdes Drive South should be continuous and made from decomposed granite [2] Permeable pavements are preferred throughout the Rancho Palos Verdes coast. (See Parking and Circulation section, above) APPROVED - September 2, 2008 151 PLANTING Planting within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast should use a native and drought tolerant plant palette that evokes and enhances the natural character of the Coast [1]. In considering planting within the Coast, the following goals should guide the decision making process: Reinforce and enhance the character of the areas within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast by implementing a consistent, appropriate, drought tolerant palette of plant materials in the public right of way, as well as at key sites, and adjacent to the Preserve Remove exotic species on public property and within the public right-of-way, wherever possible, and replace with appropriate non-invasive, native and compatible plantings Ensure that Invasive Non -Native plants are not planted in the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. A list of these plants is included in the Appendix Habitat Restoration [2] — Complete selective re - vegetation with native species per the direction in the City's NCCP, and as practical beyond its boundaries. All habitat restoration work should be done in concert with PVPLC. Native plants and seed should be sourced from local nurseries Roadway Planting [4] — There are sign cant opportunities to add planting to existing medians on Hawthorne Boulevard and Palos Verdes Drive South and West. Planting in medians should not exceed 5 feet. Species should be selected from the California - Friendly plant list included in the Appendix Key Sites Planting [3] [5] [b] - Planting at key sites should draw on the character of Preserve lands. Small trees may be considered to provide shade in public open spaces. Species should be selected from the California -Friendly plant list included in the Appendix APPROVED - September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE 1 5-1 ' 152 I Frost Elevation 5-12 I DESIGN GUIDANCE Side Elevation Eli ` !R. 0 FA K r� Front Elevation SIGNAGE AND WAYFINDING Developing a consistent approach to signage and wayfinding in the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast will assist people in finding key sites and destinations. Moreover, this signage program provides trail access information, as well as serving as a vehicle to remove the clutter of existing signage at key sites. A program such as this will enhance the area's identity and image while facilitating movement and access. The concepts included here are intended to kickstart the process of develooing a complete program for the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, as an implementation action of this Vision Plan. The City should: Develop and implement a Vision Plan identity graphics program to announce and mark the location of key gateways, public buildings and facilities, Side Elevation recreational areas, scenic attractions, coastal and preserve access points, cultural facilities, and public parking areas As shown in the concept designs included here, the program should include the following components: Identity Signage– Gateway [1] [21, Ecological Reserves [3], Park Signage [4]. - Identity signage is to be located at primary entry points to the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast and at individual parks and will r—t cue visitors to their arrival into the Rancho Palos �L77,1 Verdes Coast ` Directional Signage [51 will help visitors find their destination on the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast and must be readable and understood from a moving vehicle Side Elevatior. APPROVED -September 2, 2008 153 Wayfinding Signage—Trailhead (major) [7[, Trailhead (minor) [8], Beach Access Signs [1111, Trail signs [12] Wayfinding signage should be located at trailheads, along trails and at amenity areas and can include a trail map and specific trail information Informational Signage [6] [9] [10]— Interpretive, educational, and warning signage should be consolidated and located at trailheads or along trails. This signage can include educational information about topics like plants and animals or geology. It can also provide forewarning about topics like rattle snakes or the absence of lifeguards. Informational signage can also outline Preserve rules and regulations Suggested materials include natural stone cladding (similar to Palos Verdes stone), plain or sandblasted neutral colored concrete (drawing on the colors found in the local bluffs), powder -coated metals or Carsonite— in earth tones and Corten steel elements La BEACH ACCESS I (� `CALIFORNIA U COASTAL TRAIL GATEWAY PARK Front r. 'T -.f u ,I I� I i1er�r , ei<1t-fI, v:;r. ,Else-✓�I�fl,� ilcl� .I .i �i APPROVED - September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE 15-13 154 CAR FE iR \IERI_00K 0 5-14 I DESIGN GUIDANCE FURNISHINGS In considering the palette of furnishings, such as benches, tables, trash and recycling receptacles, bicycle racks, and drinking fountains, consistency is critical. In general, the City should reinforce and enhance the character of the areas within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast by implementing a consistent, appropriate palette of furnishings at key sites, specifically in rest areas, and within the public rights- of-way. However, in this case, a range of furnishings may be appropriate within different settings along the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. Instead of a one size fits all approach, different choices have been suggested for different setting. They are described below. Benches Overlook / Del Cerro Park bench [1] —Stone clad semi -circular bench —10' long. May include engraving addressing donor recognition on bench or pilaster Vista Point bench [1]—Stone clad semi -circular bench — 6' long. May include engraving addressing donor recognition Key Site/Feature Location bench [2] — Metal and wood benches may provide an additional level of refinement in design appropriate in key site areas which also serve as civic or cultural destinations, such as at Upper and Lower Point Vicente Standard bench [3]-- Recycled plastic benches are to be used throughout the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. Either these or the key site benches referred to above may be used at the key sites, as appropriate. For example, key sites with predominantly park functions, that are higher volume in use, with less supervision, may incorporate standard benches Picnic Tables Key Site/Feature Location picnic tables [4] - Metal picnic tables may provide an additional level of refinement in design appropriate in key site areas which also serve as civic or cultural destinations, such as at Upper and Lower Point Vicente Standard picnic table [5] — Recycled plastic tables are to be used throughout the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. Either these or the key site tables referred to above may be used at the key sites, as appropriate. For example, key sites with predominantly park functions, that are higher volume in use, with less supervision. may incorporate standard picric tables Trash And Recycling Key Site/Feature Location Receptacle [6] - Metal receptacles may provide an additional level of refinement in design appropriate in key site areas which also serve as civic or cultural destinations, such as at Upper and Lower Point Vicente Standard Receptacle [7] — Recycled plastic receptacles are to be used throughout the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. Either these or the key site receptacles referred to above may be usec at the key sites, as appropriate. For example, key sites with predominantly park functions, that are higher volume in use, with less supervision, may incorporate standard picnic Sables APPROVED - September 2, 2008 155 Bicycle Racks Key Site/Feature Location Bicycle Rack [8] - Higher style metal bike racks may provide an additional level of refinement in design appropriate in key site areas which also serve as civic or cultural destinations, such as at Upper and Lower Point Vicente Standard Bicycle Rack [9] — Standard metal bikerack/bollards may be considered throughout the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. Either these or the key site bikeracks referred to above may be used at the key sites, as appropriate Drinking Fountains Key Site/Feature Location Drinking Fountain [10] - Metal drinking fountains may provide an additional level of refinement in design appropriate in key site areas which also serve as civic or cultural destinations, such as at Upper and Lower Point Vicente Standard Drinking Fountain [111] —Stone clad drinking fountains, in a simple columnar style, could be used throughout the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, and blend unobtrusively into the landscape. Either these or the key site drinking fountains referred to above may be used at the key sites, as appropriate t APPROVED - September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE 15-15 156 5-16 1 DESIGN GUIDANCE BUS STOP Given the special natural environment within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, and its visibility within the City, it is appropriate to replace the existing standard bus shelters with a new, consistent design. The suggested design, illustrated conceptually at left, draws on the palette of materials incorporated throughout this design guidance, is intended to be unobtrusive in its setting, and to minimize disruption of views. It consists of the following elements [1] [2]: A curving stone clad wall with cantilevered metal seat An overhead shade trellis, covered with vines, and with posts set into the stone clad wall. If necessary, the shade structure could incorporate solid roof panels for rain protection APPROVED - September 2, 2008 157 FENCE TYPES AND MATERIALS Fencing is a necessary component of site design in a terrain such as that of the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, especially with its bluff edge conditions and steep drop to the Pacific Ocean. The following range of fencing types is suggested to address the different conditions within the Coast: Post and Cable - Type 1 [3] - Metal posts with horizontal wire cable running between the posts at 6 inch intervals, providing the least permeability of the fencing types, while minimizing disruption of views Post and Cable - Type 2 - Metal posts with one horizontal wire cable running between the posts. More permeable, not for use at bluff edges [1] [4] Bollards - Metal posts, with and without inset lights. Along pathway edges, at key sites [2] [5] Vehicular barrier - Engineered Wire cable, appropriate for Palos Verdes Drive edge conditions, where pedestrian safety is critical [6] Vegetation —Where possible, low shrubs should be used to demarcate edges [7] 3 .. c APPROVED -September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE 15-17 158 I II II APPROVED -September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE 15-17 158 5-18 I DESIGN GUIDANCE 13 LIGHTING Landscape, parking lot, and pedestrian lighting will be appropriate at specific key sites, such as Upper and Lower Point Vicente, as detailed site design and implementation of the concept designs for those areas move forward. No additional lighting is suggested at Del Cerro Park, Abalone Cove or the non -equestrian areas of the Gateway Park. The following lighting types are proposed within the Coast: Bollard Lighting: Low height bollard style lighting may be appropriate for pathway lighting at key sites. This lighting should be dark -skies compliant and direct light downward to the ground plane [7] [2] Reflective Markers: Where formal bollard lighting is not required edges and obstructions may unobtrusively be marked with post -mounted reflectors [3] Overhead/Parking Lot Light: Overhead lighting, where required at key sites, shall be compatible in color with the other materials in the furnishings family within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. Dark brown is consistent with the metal elements included in this design guidance. Lighting fixtures should be dark - skies compliant and direct light downward to the ground plane [4] LIGHTING AND NOISE CONTROL Because the Rancho Palos Verdes coast comprises intertwined Preserve areas, open spaces, putlic lands and community gathering areas, lighting is necessary but must be controlled, and its impacts on the Preserve and the natural environmental of the Peninsula minimized. All lighting must be dark skies compliant, and should utilize energy efficient, low intensity, high quality light to provide to provide uniform visibility while minimizing light pollution As detailed design proposals for key sites are made to the City, or by the City, not only control of light, but also control of noise must be considered. Design proposals must consider the following elements relating to noise control: Construction traffic and associated noise Permitted hours of construction allowed, as well as hours of operation for any proposed facilities Measures to minimize road noise Building and building entrances orientation in order to consider and minimize noise transfer off the site APPROVED - September 2, 2008 159 PUBLIC ART Public art can physically represent a community's history, its culture, its environment, and its aspirations. While this section of design guidance is not intended to mandate public art of any particular shape or form, or suggest any particular locations, it is meant to indicate that public art should be a consideration in the design of places and spaces within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. The examples of public art included at right are intended to demonstrate a range of possibilities, including symbolic images of culture and environment, as well as pieces which make natural settings accessible to those who cannot perceive them visually [7], or which fulfill multiple roles, as shade structures and landscape planters. The City should consider a comprehensive public art program for public places within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast. Public art adds interest, variety and beauty to public spaces. It also educates the public about Rancho Palos Verdes' rich history, culture, and environmental heritage Incorporate historic, cultural and natural references and symbols representing Rancho Palos Verdes' heritage and natural beauty in appropriate public areas and facilities Encourage and require public art in new developments, revitalization projects, and major remodels in order to enhance the public realm and create a stronger sense of place. Artwork may be freestanding (e.g, a sculpture or water fountain) [2] [4] or it may be integrated into its surroundings [3] (e.g. relief sculpture imbedded in pavement or a wall, as a mosaic or mural, lighting or sound, or decorative railing or lighting) Artwork should be appropriate for its site and ideally custom made for its particular location The local art community should be a partner in planning and designing public art APPROVED - September 2, 2008 DESIGN GUIDANCE 15-19 160 24255 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 102 J OBUILOERS 90505 raTorrance, E~vEsca�Era� (310 ) 375-9731, Fax (310) 79 791-8270-8270 C;c.7Nu�mRUCTKJN MANAGERS www.jalexanderco.com i HE J. ALEXANDER COMPANY, INC. OESIGN-EJUILD license number 596199 June 24, 2015 Messrs. Cory A. Linder and Matt Waters CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Gentlemen: We much appreciated your having taken time to meet with us yesterday to discuss our vision for a swim training facility and hope we can be included in the master plan being developed for the City Hall property. Attached conceptual site plan contemplates an active multipurpose facility complete with public areas, a gym, a weight room, offices, locker rooms, bleachers and more all built around an Olympic -size pool. The facility itself is expected to require approximately 1.8 acres plus parking which is assumed to be shared with other components of the master plan. The scope could increase or decrease depending on how the City's overall master plan evolves. A resident of Rancho Palos Verdes for more than 32 years, our team's principal, Bill Kao, foresees a partnership with the City wherein the City provides a land concession and Bill's group finances, builds and operates the complex for a prescribed number of years after which the complex reverts to the City. We feel certain our project will be an asset to both the City Hall development and to our community, and we look forward to being an integral part of your new master plan. Again, we thank you for your kind consideration. Yours truly, John A. Schoenfeld President attachments 161 'N.. 101" `_ j t d itl .LLA Matt Waters From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 4:31 PM To: Cory Linder Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: No gateway parking lot. Hi Cory — FYI — Wr From: Oliver Hazard [mailto:perryhappy@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 4:28 PM To: CC Subject: No gateway parking lot. Dear city council men and woman, We do not need a parking lot in an active landslide! I hope you are all on the same page. No ocean safety to guard the caves, where we have had drownings. Are community does not even have it's own police, we rely on Lomita which takes a long time to respond. The park rangers can not handle what they already have, so we should not give them more to deal with. It will cost a lot more than you think to build and to maintain. Pluse add to the traffic when they have to fix pvds every month or so. It is a dangerous landslide that we should not be encouraging people to go to. We need to solve Del Cerro parking problem before anything else! Hope these few points can help you make the right decision, Thank you for your time, Oliver 1 163 Matt Waters From: Del Cerro HOA. <delcerrohoa@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 6:21 PM To: Matt Waters Subject: Master Parks Plan - re: Del Cerro Park Attachments: Del Cerro HOA re Del Cerro Park.pdf Dear Matt, Thank you for all of your work on behalf of the parks. Del Cerro HOA President: Megan Moore: delcerrohoa@g_mail.com Secretary: Treasurer: Al & Kathy Edgerton: AlnKathyE@msn.com Board Members: Mark Martin: puri)lezebra796@Yahoo.com Bonnie Luthi: briinrpv@aol.com Nadine Chrien: thechriens@cox.net Miriam Varend: varend@verizon.net Del Cerro Website http://www.palosverdes.com/delcerro/index.html 1 im• Del Cerro Homeowners Association Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 30 June 2015 Comments Regarding the Draft Master Parks Plan Update First, we would like to thank the City Council and stats for addressing the primary area of concern that Del Cerro residents raised during the Master Park Plan Update survey and workshop process: the unsafe traffic and parking conditions the neighborhoods near the Burma Rd. entrance to the nature preserve have been experiencing. We believe that the decisions made at the lune 16' City Council meeting will go a long way toward enabling safe passage into and out of our community. At 4.5 acres in size, Del Cerro Park is the smallest neighborhood park in RPV. It has primarily served surrounding communities since it was acquired and those residents have not indicated a need for permanent restrooms. Del Cerro residents do not support installing them in the park. However, there is a great need for additional bathroom facilities in the nature preserve. There is currently only one porta-potty in the preserve to accommodate over a thousand visitors per week. Standards for the appropriate facilities to accommodate a thousand visitors certainly must exist — and we are certain that one existing toilet (by the water tank) would not meet that standard. The City needs to add at least 2 or 3 more porta-potties in the preserve - away from, and out of the sight of, nearby homes. A possible location would be to add a second porta-potty next to the existing one. The preserve trail keepers could likely offer suggestions as to other appropriate places to locate accommodations along the trails. Each porta-potty should be augmented with a trash receptacle. An additional trash can and mutt mitt dispenser should be placed near the intersection of Crenshaw Blvd. and Rattlesnake Trail tmilhead. Visitors currently dump their mutt mitt bags at the trail marker by the Crenshaw sidewalk. While Del Cerro Park is cleaned up on Monday mornings as part of the landscape maintenance, the street and sidewalk area along Crenshaw has not been maintained regularly. We also bring to the City's attention a hazard to small children and pets in the preserve. A vertical storm drain structure exists off Burma Rd. near the trailhead gate. It is located just outside the fence lines behind #3 and #5 Amber Sky Dr. near the boundary between those two properties. The structure is a steep -walled conical deep collector drain and is currently unfenced. Although it is several yards off Burma Rd., it needs to be fenced off or covered so that small children or pets do not fall into it. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Megan ore President Del Cerro Homeowners Association 165 Matt Waters From: Gary Randall <grapecon@cox.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 7:15 AM To: Jim Knight; Susan Brooks; Jerry Duhovic; Brian Campbell; Anthony Misetich Cc: Matt Waters; Cory Linder Subject: Thanks! Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: Thank you, thank you, thank you! For your unanimous decision to "jettison" Gateway Park at last night's city council meeting. You heard the people of the community, and rather than postponing a decision, you took immediate and decisive action and I commend you. I also thought the additional comments, discussion, and motions were in line with what the residents of RPV want from their parks system. Special thanks also to Matt and Cory for the hard work they put into garnering relevant and important public input, and I know they will continue to work hard as they put together a final plan for your review and approval. Regards Gary Randall me Klatt Waters From: Cory Linder Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 9:13 AM To: Doug Willmore; Carolynn Petru Cc: Daniel Trautner; Matt Waters Subject: FW: Meeting follow up FYI ..... see below. From: E Cicoria [mailto:cicoriae@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:55 AM To: CC Cc: barbailor@gmail.com; avona@pvplc.org; Cory Linder; wkswank@me.com Subject: Meeting follow up Good morning all, I want to follow up on a couple of things that came up at last night's City Council meeting. First, thank you for directing staff to come up with a plan to address some of the problems we are seeing in the areas covered by the Parks Master Plan Update. I believe that your intent is not just to add somebody to pick up trash and I hope that is accurate. We need to find a way to elevate the conduct of visitors to our parks, beaches and preserve lands, not just clean up after them. I believe, just as with the mountain bikers who were causing so much destruction in our Preserve, we need to educate and then cite --why else do we have ordinances? Second, I know that each of you appreciates what the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy has done for our City and the entire Peninsula with the acquisition and management of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. Yet 1 hear some residents, frustrated by the influx of visitors, cast blame on the Conservancy with comments such as "We didn't have these problems before the Conservancy bought this land." Well, we didn't have these problems before social media. We did have problems on the land. Social media was bound to exacerbate those problems whether or not the land had been acquired. Do you recall the multiple mountain bike playgrounds --vast, utterly denuded patches of ground characterized by massive mounds of dirt, ramps and jumps --basically multiple BMX courses --cropping up all over the area and scarring the landscape, during the years that money was being raised to acquire the land? Consider what that area would be like with social media bringing more of that crowd, had the City and PVPLC not stepped in to exercise some control over the land. A barren moonscape, no doubt. The public receives a tremendous benefit from the donors and volunteers who support PVPLC. That said, of course both PVPLC and the City can and should do better --and I believe they (we) have been doing better --and I'm trying to do my part as both a resident and a PVPLC supporter. Third, there seemed to be an interest on the part of at least some members of City Council in having a better understanding of the Preserve operations, particularly with respect to the problems associated with public recreational use. Andrea Vona spoke briefly about the collaboration between PVPLC and City staff, mentioning the Volunteer Trail Watch. If you are interested, here is how that works.- We orks: We have volunteers out hiking and riding the trails daily, taking photos and notes of myriad "activities" and "evidence of activities within the Preserve. (These volunteers are also picking 167 up bags and bags of litter, re -closing illegal spur trails when brush used to block access has been tossed aside or trampled, and talking to preserve visitors about this wonderful asset.) • We volunteers then record our observations on a web portal, identifying activities and location, by reserve and trail name. • The Volunteer Trail Watch Coordinators (currently Barb Ailor and me) review all the reports weekly and prepare summaries of things that call for prompt attention --graffiti that needs to be removed, signs that need to be repaired, spur trails that need to be closed --providing photos and information regarding location. This information goes to both PVPLC and City staff. • The Volunteer Trail Watch Coordinators then meet with City and PVPLC staff monthly to discuss problem areas and possible solutions. It is a collaborative approach; it is a cross -jurisdictional problem. A recent example of the overlap and interconnectedness of problems and solutions related to our parks, beaches, and preserve lands might be helpful: We have seen an increase in illegal trails and concomitant hillside erosion from Abalone Cove Shoreline Park down the hillside (which is within the Abalone Cove Reserve of the PV Nature Preserve) to Abalone Cove Beach below. These are not Preserve visitors per se. They are primarily fishermen coming to the beach, damaging habitat on the way. PVPLC staff planted cactus to increase Cactus Wren habitat and closed off discernible trails down the hillside with branches and brush. VTW was asked to increase our presence there. And we have. Last Friday, five of us picked up many, many bags of trash while "monitoring" the Preserve --but the trash was mostly on the beach and in the park. Monday we picked up a lot more trash. Graffiti, as well, is all along the trails, be they preserve trails or park trails. Likewise trampled vegetation and the scarring that comes from multiple trail cuts. I am optimistic that both City and PVPLC staff are increasingly focused on finding and implementing solutions to the problems that come with having such wonderful parks, beaches and preserve lands --as well as venues such as Terranea--that are the envy of people far and wide, generating social buzz that brings acclaim as well as headaches. We can, and I'm confident that with your support we will, improve our "game" --and we must insist that the general public plays by the rules. believe that an increase in City staff presence, focusing the public's attention on City ordinances, will go a long way toward alleviating some of the problems we are seeing. One or two roving staff members to talk to the public about our City ordinances as people enter our parks, beaches and preserves, will tell the public that somebody is watching --hopefully raising the public's consciousness of their conduct. My hope is that this staff presence will also provide a more direct connection with MRCA to follow up with citations after information alone proves not to be enough to "educate" people into elevating their conduct. Thank you again for your time and earnest efforts toward the betterment of our community. Eva •: Matt Waters From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 9:13 AM To: Cory Linder Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: Last Night's meeting Hi Cory — FYI — CP From: NOEL PARK [mailto:noel@jdcorvette.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:33 AM To: CC Subject: Last Night's meeting Thank you for a very productive and informative meeting. Good job! I was particularly impressed by your positive comments on view protection and restoration, an issue which is dear to my heart. 1 agree with your wise decision on "Gateway Park", and the decision to create some mechanism to clean up trash and graffiti around the City. 1 am not a big fan of the skatepark idea, but I do agree that, if we are going to do it, Upper Pt. Vicente is the best place. I am pretty pessimistic about the possibility of it's being built in Palos Verdes Estates' Tony" environs. I still remember their stonewall approach to the dog park proposal, LOL. And a special thanks to whoever it was who questioned the appropriateness of an equipment storage smack dab in the middle of the view across the Upper Pt. Vicente property. There MUST be a better way. And thanks for your commitment to keep park development to a "neighborhood friendly" level and to preserving as much as possible the "semi -rural" character of our City. Very best regards to all, Noel Park 6715 EI Rodeo Road Rancho Palos Verdes 90275 (562) 413-5147 cell This email is freefrom viruses and rnalware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 1 im• Matt Waters From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:52 AM To: Cory Linder Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: Gateway Park Hi Cory— FYI — M From: Donald Bell [mailto:dwbrpv@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 10:12 AM To: CC Cc: Don Bell Subject: Fwd: Gateway Park Begin forwarded message: From: Donald Bell <dwbrpv gmail.com> Subject. Gateway Park Date: July 1, 2015 at 10:03:26 AM PDT To: CC(cz�,prv.com Cc: Don Bell <dwbrpv@@gmaii.com>, Sue <suebrpv(cD-gmail.com> Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, I want to commend and thank you for your decision to eliminate the Gateway Park concept from future consideration. I was unable to attend last night's meeting and intended this morning to write a letter asking that Gateway Park be denied. I was a PUMP Committee Member. Gateway Park was Barbara Dye's concept of a small Docent Teaching Center on the bluff between the landscape scarp and Klondike Canyon. Any parking was to have only been along PV Drive South. During the PUMP deliberations the equestrian interests presented several plans for a horse center in the "mud hole" area. Your now Staff offered a mirror of the equestrian concepts with no investigation of geologic maintenance costs or feasibility (now compounded by the social media exposure of the risks in the entire southern coast area). I am concerned that there will be more effort to recreate the equestrian facility or trails access in the southern slopes area (including Ladera Linda). I am firmly against this development. 170 Thank you for you decision Donald Bell 3571 Vigilance Drive Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 171 Matt Waters From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hi Cory — FYI — Carolynn Petru Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:53 AM Cory Linder Matt Waters FW: Parks Master Plan Update council meeting Freeman Master Plan Update for CC 06 30 15.pdf From: John Freeman [mailto:jrfree@cox.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 10:53 AM To: CC Cc: Doug Willmore Subject: Parks Master Plan Update council meeting Mayor Knight and City Council members: I just wanted to thank you for your review of the Parks Master Plan update last night. I was really impressed with the breadth and knowledge (and politeness) of all the speakers regarding various parks, trails, and features. I learned a lot myself listening to you and the speakers, some quite experienced in hiking, trails and other considerations relative to safety and possible consequences of unfettered expansion. There seemed to be consensus that "Less is More", not as a stingy policy but as an approach to preserve and protect our natural resources. (Yes, that's my pitch again for following the General Plan. (D ) Enclosed are the slides from my PowerPoint presentation. We are looking forward to completing the detailed recommendation with Rec & Parks and presenting that to you for consideration and discussion in the near future. Thank you. John Freeman, President Pacific View Homeowners Association www.palosverdes.com/pacificview "Working Together for a Better Neighborhood" M Matt Waters From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 2:28 PM To: Cory Linder Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: Hi Cory— FYI — AIN From: Gene Dewey [mailto:rgdewey@outlook.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 2:17 PM To: CC Subject: RPV City Council Thank you all for your decision last night 6/30/15 on the park plans and for all the time that Councilman Duhovic and others took to attend all of the scoping meeting to hear the citizens of the community concerns first hand. Gene Dewey Vigilance DR Sent from Windows Mail 173 Matt Waters From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 3:24 PM To: k p Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: Eastview Park Dear KG Chang — I wanted to let you know that the City Council has decided not to build an off -leash dog park at Eastview Park. However, the Council asked staff to return with a proposal to increase park staffing levels city-wide, including having staff on-site at Eastview Park. In addition to off -leash dogs, the Council was concerned about trash, graffiti and loitering at several of the City's unstaffed park locations. The City's experience is that we have far fewer of these problems where there is a consistent staff presence. I've coped the Recreation and Parks staff on this email, so that they will have your contact information and can keep you apprised of further developments. In the meantime, I've asked the CORE Sheriff's deputies to continue to visit the park as often as they can. They recently helped the City in clearing out an encampment on the property. Best regards, Carolynn Petru Deputy City Manager LA -City of Rancho Palos Verdes (310) 544-5203 carolynn@rpyca.&ov www.rpvca.gov WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN, PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS AND IF I AM IN YOUR CONTACTS, SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM CAROLYNNPRPV.COM TO CAROLYNN@RPVCA.GOV. THANK YOU! 174 Matt Waters From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 3:34 PM To: Cory Linder Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: Thank you for your Decision on the Gateway Park! Hi Cory— FYI — C�lr From: homecoding@gmail.com [mailto:homecoding@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Madeleine Mc Jones Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 3:30 PM To: CC Subject: Thank you for your Decision on the Gateway Park! Dear City Council of Rancho Palos Verdes, Thank you for letting birds have quiet nests, and ravens having no flying drones. Thank you for not making more infrastructure for cars, and more access for what is over accessed. Thank you for not having rescues and graffiti and horse trailers. I am truly amazed this decision came after all these years of power - point presentations, 1 have to re -faith myself in the fact that sometimes government works and people can let go of old plans and respond to the community. This property has the weeds and chaparral that make our city special, thank you for let them grow on un -paved. ( I would love pavement removal to be rewarded like sod removal.) I hope you can continue and work on new projects that are rewarding to more of our community. I am now eating my words that you would never let go ...but i am very happy to do so. Madeleine McJones #3Tangerine Rd RPV 175 Matt Waters From: John Freeman <jrfree@cox.net> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 3:47 PM To: Matt Waters Subject: Parks Master Plan Update Hi Matt, Nice job at the City Council meeting. You covered a lot of material and it all looked good. Thanks for your help with my comments and slides. Are you going to update the Parks Master Plan webpage information and also post your PowerPoint presentation? I hope so. http://www.rpvca.gov/203/Parks-Master-PIan Thanks. John Freeman (Happy 4t" of July!) 176 Matt Waters From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:30 AM To: Cory Linder Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: closing the gate on Gateway Park Hi Cory — FYI — From: bjhilde@aol.com [mailto:bjhilde@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:46 PM To: CC Subject: closing the gate on Gateway Park Lady and gentlemen, A big "Thank You" for closing out (permanently, I hope) the insane idea of Gateway Park. I'm sure that with that vote you have saved the City from headaches, dangers, and a pile of taxpayer money. 177 Matt Waters From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 3:20 PM To: Cory Linder Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: RPV City Hall Skate Park rejection Hi Cory — FYI — XWO From: gary kessler [mailto:garykes@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2015 12:27 PM To: Jim Knight Cc: CC Subject: RPV City Hall Skate Park rejection Dear Mayor Knight, A brief note to thank you for rejecting the proposed skate park at the recent council meeting (article link below) a few days ago. As a resident who lives in close proximity to the proposed site (immediately opposite RPV City Hall off of Hawthorne) I can only imagine the constant drone of skateboards, not to mention the myriad of other considerations that accompany such a park. Having resided in my current residence for the last 13 years 1 frequently hear noise currently generated from the proximity of City Hall, I can only imagine what it would be like with a skate park. I don't doubt that our kids should have places to recreate, but this is not the appropriate venue, nor medium, privately funded, or otherwise. Thank you again, Gary Kessler 30900 Via La Cresta Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 We http://www.dailybreeze.com/lifestyle/20150701 /rancho-Palos-verdes-city-council-backs-skate-park-nixes- upgrades-at-gatewa -park 179 Matt Waters From: Cory Linder Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:55 AM To: Daniel Trautner Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: Lower Point Vicente Concept Plan by Lynn Swank FYI From: erstevens@cox.net fmailto:erstevens@cox.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:07 AM To: CC; PC; Doug Willmore; Ara Mihranian Cc: ken.delong@verizon.net; lowell@transtalk.com; mothermac@mac.com; cockeandco@verizon.net; farmer_g_iv19131864@yahoo.com; judyfrankel@gmail.com; greg@groystonlaw.com; Idb910@juno.com; dlfriedson@gmail.com; radlsmith@cox.net; momofyago@gmail.com; cprotem73@verizon.net; gardner4@earthlink.net; garlandk77@gmail.com; Michael Throne; Cory Linder; SunshineRPV@aol.com; Lenee Bilski; lynn.swank@cox.net; Joyce; Jessica'; Emeric Rodich (mickeyrodich Subject: RE: Lower Point Vicente Concept Plan by Lynn Swank Subject: Re: Lower Point Vicente Concept Plan by Lynn Swank I really appreciate what Lynn & Sunshine both have written to the City Council & Staff about lower Point Vicente Park that NEEDS TO BE PRESERVED FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS TO ENJOY ITS NATURAL BEAUTY. We were able to stop the Annenberg proposal process & we now need to stop the RPV City from destroying this natural Beauty. Lynn's well written letter should never have been inadvertently left out of the July 7th City Council Staff Report because I am sure just as the Gateway parking lot was put to rest this issue with lower Point Vicente Park should have also been put to rest. Lets us preserve the Beauty of our Coast & open the view for all to enjoy. One of these days I would like to see the City trim the trees along PV DR S. in front of the lower Point Vicente Park so everyone can see our wonderful Open Coastal View Corridor also the Light House Trees could use a good trim. Ed. Stevens From: SunshineRPV@aol.com [maiito:SunshineRPV(a)aol.cornj Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 10:31 PM To: Iynn.swank@cox.net Cc: ccairpvvca. ov; pc rpvcagov; dwiIImore(& rovca.gov_; ken.delong@verizon.net; iowellCa)transtalk.com; rnothermacmac.com; cockeandco@verizon.net; farmer a iv19131864@yahoo.com; judyfrankel@ mail.com; greq@groystonlaw.com; Idb9 juno.com; dlfriedson@clmail.com; EZStevens cox.net; radlsmith@cox net; rnomofya o gmail.com; Wrotern 73 a)verizon.net; gardner4@earthlink. net; garlandk77@amail.com; michaelt@rvp corn; c-oryl(&rDvca.gov Subject: Partial Coast Vision Plan "update" Re: FW: Lower Point Vicente Concept Plan Hi Lynn, Thank you ever so much for taking the time to share all this history. I became a Los Serenos Docent in order to help implement the Living History Museum as presented to the Open Space Planning and Rec. & Parks Task Force and subsequently approved by the RPV City Council. I soon learned that until the site's drainage problems are resolved, nothing is going to happen. Well, the Japanese, irrigated, farming element (let people learn to grow food on the Hatano farm) has gone away and the vegetables and orchard proposal with a Master Gardner as program manager, has been rejected by the "focus group". None of the original elements were to be "structures" or "exhibits". Each one still has a program manager waiting in the wings. Local people of all ages can simply enjoy doing things the way they were done decades/centuries ago and share the information with the next generations. The Caucasian style dry farming element is still possible at Upper Point Vicente as described in the draft Parks, Recreation and Open Space Strategic Plan with all the equipment and Farmer G the Fourth as program manager before he dies like Farmer G the Third did at age 95. When it comes to Lower Point Vicente Park, all that is needed is a Hydrology Engineer who is aware of the trails network and the proposed activity sites. It has been around fifteen years since the erosion became a noticeable problem. I just can't understand why Staff doesn't take care of the most basic of ours City's treasures. ... S 310-377-8761 From. Lynn Swank [mailto:lynn.swank a cox.net] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 5:24 PM To: Ara Mihranian Cc: RPV Council City; Joel Rojas; Doug Willmore Subject: Re: Lower Point Vicente Concept Plan Thanks Ara! . Lynn On Jul 6, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Ara Mihranian <AraMarpvca.gov> wrote: The following email from Lynn Swank, dated February 23, 2015, was inadvertently left out of the July 7th City Council Staff Report regarding Lower Point Vicente. Ms. Swank's email raises concerns with the outdoor exhibits proposed as Phase 11 for the park improvements at Lower Point Vicente. A hard copy of the attached email will be transmitted to the Council at the July 7th meeting. on mmzffm�- �p � IMES320M 01HURNINTIMPIM Q ........... ATIJAW, 'ONA"i, E1200 NOW" A ARAM@B_VVGk.GOV. ADo you really need to print this e-mail? This e-mail message contains information belonging to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, which may be privileged, confidential and/or protected from disclosure. The information is intended only for use of the individual or entity named. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, or are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. From: Lynn Swank [mailto:lynn.swank@cox.net] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 11:09 AM To: Ara Mihranian Cc: Cory Linder Subject: Lower Point Vicente Concept Plan Ara, Thanks for meeting me regarding the Lower Point Vicente Concept Plan. I couldn't attend the last meeting and you were gracious to fill me in about the comments expressed at the meeting and to help me understand the specific plan elements. I have copied Cory Linder because I addressed some issues related to the Master Plan and PVIC. We have discussed on numerous occasions the need for a park at Lower Point Vicente that allows our residents to appreciate the RPV coastline and while doing so to enjoy, with their families or by themselves, the wonderful space and natural elements of a park so near the ocean. I believe a setting that allows users to walk through the entire park and play Frisbee, fly kites, or engage in other unstructured recreational activities is needed in our City. The grassland/play area, overlook, minimal trail network around the perimeter and bioswales are very good features of the plan. The Wall of Honor to recognize residents in our City is long overdue and I am glad the City Council approved this. My only comment here is that maybe it should be closer to the ocean providing a view both of the City and ocean, rather than adjacent to the parking lot. I have previously expressed concerns about the scope of the Concept Plan originally presented by the focus committee and i see nothing in the current rendition that allays my concerns. The Point Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC) has become an important element of this park as it interprets the natural features of the ocean environment such as whale watching while giving visitors a brief overview of the geology and cultural history of our City and the peninsula. The relationship between our land and the ocean has been an important one throughout the decades and a clear understanding of prior land uses helps all of us to appreciate the joy of Lower Point Vicente and the need to maintain this park with a minimalist imprint on the surrounding land. Both the Federal and State governments made this clear to the City during the Annenberg proposal process as it related to the deed restrictions and POU. I. I don't see the overriding reason for considering LPV separately from the overall General Parks Master Plan Process. Yes, when the focus group was formed years ago the City wanted to expedite the future plans for this park. The intervening years have clearly indicated that there is no need to consider LPV separately from other parks because nothing has been done and there are no approved grant funds that need to be spent immediately. This is different from the Abalone Cove situation in that the City had grant funds that needed to be spent by a date certain and therefore an expedited process was necessary. 2. There are several different plans within the City that directly impact what can and cannot be done in our parks. The General Plan, The Coastal Plan, The Vision Plan, NCCP, etc., all impact what can be done in our parks. To consider park use without examining and sharing with our residents any restrictions about park use is not transparent and should be clearly stated as each park use is discussed. 3. The passive/active use definition is of particular concern to me as all parks are discussed, and especially LPV. The City has struggled with this definition and often seemingly applies a different definition depending on situational convenience of the department or commission rendering a decision. I have seen the Planning Commission discuss this issue and often reach different conclusions depending on the group that makes the presentation or who is now on the Planning Commission. I have heard for 20 years that the General Plan needs to be updated and a definition will be forthcoming that will enable residents and the City Council to weigh in on this very important issue. I am still waiting. How can we really have a Parks Master Plan or a Lower Point Vicente Plan without a clear understanding and agreement about the meaning of passive and active? 4. The Deed Restrictions and Program of Utilization for LPV should be clearly stated as part of any Plan for Lower Point Vicente. As you said, the National Park Service was advised of the concept elements of the LPV Plan and saw no glaring problems. However, they were not given the final plans, construction or otherwise, so this opinion by the NPS is only an opinion based upon information that the City provided. Our City must decide what we want and is best for our uses and needs and not try to "get away with" what we can just to satisfy a verbal OK from the NPS. While the current plans may seem acceptable to some, others do not agree. A thorough discussion of this issue by the residents is needed before the Plan is presented to the City Council. 5. The Master Plan Survey, while not completed, shows that there is no (zero) desire of our residents to have more educational exhibits in our parks. Prior controversies throughout the years have demonstrated this (Annenberg, the proposed $7M Nature Center at Abalone Cove). Perhaps the question wasn't framed in the proper context of park usage, but I suspect that residents DO NOT give educational exhibits requiring city maintenance or staffing to be a high priority in RPV. A great deal of taxpayer money and resources are already provided at the school district level. 6. What does the City really want to do with PVIC? Do we want a small interpretive center that already exists or do we want to expand our educational footprint and use Lower Point Vicente Park to do so and turn it into a museum? This question needs to be answered either through the General Plan or City Council before any decisions can be made. As a resident I don't want a small interest group to tell me what I need in this very special park. Elected representatives need to make this decision. Are the Los Serenos Docents considered part of City staff and be treated as such? Do they control what happens at LPV? What role does the City want them to play, and is this consistent with their mission statement? 7. Regardless of what is decided about the future use of this park, I like the idea that you mentioned: a phased -in approach. Some things can be done right away such as the grassy area, parking, perimeter trails and parking/bioswales. Of course there are costs associated with these elements and the IMAC probably should be aware of the infrastructure elements, but I'm sure you've done this. 8. Los Serenos Point Vicente docents have made an important contribution to the City at the Interpretive Center, Abalone Cove and Ladera Linda (Forrestal). I have been a member for over 20 years and served in many leadership positions including President. I recall quite vividly having discussions with Diana McIntyre about ideas to help teach children about our diverse resources, and in the fledging years of tours for school children we used the front outdoor patio to discuss geology, cultural history and of course whales. A small dirt patch that could be used for a "seeded" archeological dig or village were discussed but never done because there just wasn't enough time during a school tour to teach about both the exhibits in PVIC and the outdoors. The teachers and the children both wanted to learn about the ocean because their inland schools didn't have this resource. They went other places to learn about ranchos, fossils, animals, etc. The ocean and outdoor environment was something they could not duplicate elsewhere. It now appears to me that Lower Point Vicente is now regarded as the sole "playground" for docents, and other users are insignificant compared to the needs and desires of the docents. This simply should not be the case — Lower Point Vicente Park is for the use of all residents. The focus group does not represent the interests and opinions of all docents. It should come as no surprise that a docent education committee and a city -paid curator would want all of these outdoor education elements — that is their interest. The Point Vicente Interpretive Center is just that — it was built and received permission to build from the Federal Government solely for the purpose of interpreting the surrounding marine environment. It was never a museum as some people want to call it. PVIC exists solely to simple interpret the surrounding environment as simple as possible without lots of bells and whistles. In fact, PVIC was expanded in order to add more bells and whistles. We simply don't need more outdoor exhibits. 6 Specifically: Docent Tours Who is going to lead tours of all of the outdoor exhibits? Docents scheduled in PVIC are not hikers; they want to stay indoors or in the confines of the small patio. The hikers are at Abalone Cove and Forrestal. Many PVIC docents can't walk too far, don't want to lead outdoor tours and don't want to have anything to do with children's tours. Will the City provide staff to conduct tours of these costly exhibits? Maintenance and Vandalism Someone will need to pay for these recurring expenses. Docent Support Has a survey been done of docents as to whether they want this or will staff it? I am a docent and have not been asked. The focus group should be cautious when or if they claim that this has been reviewed and approved by the docents. Bunker This is a structure that needs to be built and is in violation of the POU. WWII bunkers already exist at City Hall and Abalone Cove. We don't need another one that is brand new. Tvonga Village Again, this is a structure that needs to be built that is counter to the POU. An exhibit already exists inside the PVIC building so why duplicate this? The Palos Verdes Historical Society has designated an Indian Village in Palos Verdes Estates as an historical site. The RPV City Council has recently recognized this society as the prime designator of historical sites on the Peninsula and RPV, so I don't think the council will consider a newly constructed village not even positioned on space once occupied by a village to be adequate for the high standards of the Palos Verdes Historical Society. Why have a fake village when a real one exists close by? Spanish Rancho This is covered inside PVIC, and a large Rancho already exists elsewhere and is used by teachers for lessons covering only our Spanish heritage. Dry Farming How much was really done in RPV? Will equipment be used to demonstrate how this is done? This could be interesting given the City's and State's emphasis on the drought and solutions to conserve water, but more details are necessary. Archeological Dig 00=0 This would be better situated in Abalone Cove because a midden already exists there. Missing Elements Not discussed but certainly conspicuously missing from the plan is storage for all the new exhibits and restrooms. While there may be a need for storage if the exhibits are approved, there is no mention of a possible location. Is there a need for new restrooms? I don't know the utilization of the current indoor and outdoor facilities at PVIC, but there is no discussion and if either element is needed they should be discussed as part of the plan. Ara, I know this email covers a wide scope of topics under the umbrella of the Lower Point Vicente Concept Plan, but I think they are all interrelated and must all be considered in constructing a Master Plan. While this is the concept stage of LPV, I have seen things quickly go from concept to construction plans without fully addressing all of the concerns one might have about the concept. Again, thanks for your help and I look forward to talking to you in the future. Please call if you have any questions. Lynn . ook Matt Waters From: Cory Linder Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 5:32 PM To: Matt Waters Subject: FW: Lower Point Vicente Park. There is good news and bad. FYI From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 5:28 PM To: Cory Linder; Michael Throne Cc: Ara Mihranian; Daniel Trautner; Joel Rojas Subject: FW: Lower Point Vicente Park. There is good news and bad. Hi Cory/Michael — FYI — CP From: SunshineRPV@aol.com [mailto:SunshineRPV@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 5:21 PM To: CC; Doug Willmore; ]udyfrankei@@;mail.com; cprotem73@verizon.net; ken.delong@verison.net; lowell@transtalk.com; cockeandco@verizon.net; verikon cox.net; momo a o@gmail.com; Idb910@luno corn Subject: Lower Point Vicente Park. There is good news and bad. Dear interested parties, Last night the RPV City Council voted to eliminate the phase 2 exhibits from the Lower Point Vicente Coast Vision Plan "update". The bad news is what they did not do. They did not direct Staff to aggressively pursue remediation of the drainage problems on the site. Given a couple of years, the Infrastructure Management Advisory Committee (IMAC) might recommend that this be added to the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). There was lots of discussion about "taking care of what we have". But, the Council did not direct Staff to pursue anything specific to fixing this site. Status quo remains the same. This beautiful parkland will remain a weed patch where there once was a flower and vegetable farm. Other than the six or seven years when a portion of the park was closed for lead remediation and the PVIC expansion, the farm was open to the public. It was even worthy of an artist's rendition. The only obstructions to letting people show other people and children how to grow things there now is the liability risk, the Staff oversight and the cost of the water. Oh, and the City Council directive to let it happen. If you are interested in learning how to grow food, write to our City Council at cc@rpvca.gov and Judy Frankel at iudv a,writeindependent.org. ...5 310-377-8761 We From: kaygee chang [mailto:kuwiha yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 5:17 PM To: CC Subject: Eastview Park Comments I understand you're looking for comments on how to improve Eastview Park. Here's some thoughts I have as I was a frequent user until recently. Regarding staffing, Eastview is a beautiful park which has been greatly improved the last few years. However, left the way it is, it is beginning to degrade quickly: 1) Dog poop is everywhere from the dogs running free and/or careless owners not picking it up. 2) Homeless camps have been set up at least twice in the last six months, requiring numerous calls to Parks & Rec to get them removed. People pick thru the trash bins around the camps leaving a mess. The last camp was there over a month and only because the Mayor came to the recent Saturday movie night in the park was it finally removed prior to her arrival. 3) It is hard for little children to run free and play and people with leashed dogs to enjoy the park as so many dogs are running free. This was a problem I experienced in June as my dog and I were attacked while walking in the park one morning by an unrestrained large dog causing a back injury to me and surgery for my dog. We no longer frequent the park since this occurred. 4) My correspondence with the Sheriffs department regarding the loose dogs has been a waste of time as they invent lame excuses such as "people see the squad car pulling into the parking lot and leash their dogs". Is it that hard to have the deputies park on the street and walk into the park or have plain clothed officers or animal control staff come in? 5) The fence between the park and the Smart & Final plaza had its barbed wire removed and a section of the fence torn open months ago so people can come and go from that access point. This allows much faster entry and exit to the park for people who may have bad intentions and do not want to be seen. 6) When I was going to the park, there were at least 3 instances over about 6 months when I was walking with my dog in the late mornings and a man came out from behind the bushes pulling his pants up. I challenged him, but he ran away. There have also been used condoms found laying near the bushes. Do we really want small children in the park to encounter this? 7) The park has gates and posted signs for park hours at the main entry as well as leash requirements, yet they are not enforced. What's the point if nothing is enforced? From my comments above, you can see that there is a need for a stronger presence at Eastview Park to keep the facility from deteriorating further. I would like to see empowered staff there on site who can help to maintain the parks beauty and safety as well as formally cite people who are abusing its rules. What is there now is not working. Matt Waters From: Carolynn Petru Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 7:58 AM To: Cory Linder Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: Eastview Park Comments Hi Cory — I've been encouraging Kaygee (not sure if it's a man or a woman) for some time to let the Council know how they feel about the off -leash dogs and other issues at Eastview Park. I'm so glad he/she finally wrote in! NZ From: kaygee chang [mailto:kuwiha@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 5:17 PM To: CC Subject: Eastview Park Comments understand you're looking for comments on how to improve Eastview Park. Here's some thoughts I have as I was a frequent user until recently. Regarding staffing, Eastview is a beautiful park which has been greatly improved the last few years. However, left the way it is, it is beginning to degrade quickly: 1) Dog poop is everywhere from the dogs running free and/or careless owners not picking it up. 2) Homeless camps have been set up at least twice in the last six months, requiring numerous calls to Parks & Rec to get them removed. People pick thru the trash bins around the camps leaving a mess. The last camp was there over a month and only because the Mayor came to the recent Saturday movie night in the park was it finally removed prior to her arrival. 3) It is hard for little children to run free and play and people with leashed dogs to enjoy the park as so many dogs are running free. This was a problem I experienced in June as my dog and I were attacked while walking in the park one morning by an unrestrained large dog causing a back injury to me and surgery for my dog. We no longer frequent the park since this occurred. 4) My correspondence with the Sheriffs department regarding the loose dogs has been a waste of time as they invent lame excuses such as "people see the squad car pulling into the parking lot and leash their dogs". Is it that hard to have the deputies park on the street and walk into the park or have plain clothed officers or animal control staff come in? 5) The fence between the park and the Smart & Final plaza had its barbed wire removed and a section of the fence torn open months ago so people can come and go from that access point. This allows much faster entry and exit to the park for people who may have bad intentions and do not want to be seen. 6) When I was going to the park, there were at least 3 instances over about 6 months when I was walking with my dog in the late mornings and a man came out from behind the bushes pulling his pants up. I challenged him, but he ran away. There have also been used condoms found laying near the bushes. Do we really want small children in the park to encounter this? 7) The park has gates and posted signs for park hours at the main entry as well as leash requirements, yet they are not enforced. What's the point if nothing is enforced? 191 From my comments above, you can see that there is a need for a stronger presence at Eastview Park to keep the facility from deteriorating further. I would like to see empowered staff there on site who can . help to maintain the parks beauty and safety as well as formally cite people who are abusing its rules. What is there now is not working. 192 From: Kit Fox Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 9:17 AM To: Cory Linder; Daniel Trautner; Ron Dragoo; Michael Throne; Nicole Jules Subject: FW: Violation of Dog Leash ordinances/code @ Eastview Park this morning and nearly every other morning so these violators have informed me! FYI RE: Eastview Park Kat Fox, AIC:P City of Rancho Palos Verdes (510) 544-5226 kitf@rtwca. ov_ �,. ..11111 tQ From: April Sandell [mailto:hvyba s cox.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 9:10 AM To: CC <CC@r_pvca.gov> Cc: chateau4us@att.net Lacombe <chateau4us att.net>; Richard Wagoner <r_wagoner@cox.net> Subject: Violation of Dog Leash ordinances/code @ Eastview Park this morning and nearly every other morning so these violators have informed me! Dear Council Members, Today I experienced a very uncomfortable situation and twice before. This morning's incident was the worst of verbal responses I received from usual "violators" as I kindly encouraged them to put their dogs on a leash. It was made clear to me they feel since their dogs are friendly the law doesn't apply to them. One man told me they that are in the park every morning and he has never seen me before. I told him that I don't walk at the park on a regular basis hence the reason I appeared to be a stranger in the neighborhood. He suggested that given they use the park more often than I do, gives them greater control of how things are done at this park! I was absolutely stunned by his words. 193 The group went on their way circling around and around the path as their dogs continued to run free. It's true, that I don't have to walk at this park. I could drive elsewhere to walk , which I ordinarily do on regular basis, but lately considered the benefits of staying closer in the area. You should know these people did pick up their dog's poop. Why should they? April Sandell P.S. Some of you may or may not recall that in and around 1990 1 was President of the Rolling Hills Riveria and as leaders the Directors took on the charge of creating Eastview Park in cooperation with the City and County. Most of the work was accomplished by Directors Bob and Linda West. WN Matt Waters From: Marty Foster <martycrna@cox.net> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 9:55 AM To: Matt Waters Subject: Parks update plan Good morning I see from the weekly city manager report the the park plan will be discussed at the October CC meeting I believe you said the community would be able to view the conclusions for the plan prior to CC discussion. Is the plan finished and available now? Best Marty Foster Sent from my iPad 195 Matt Waters From: madoka <madokanv@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 12:20 PM To: Parks Subject: East View Park To whom it may concern, I have written to you more than a couple years ago about the off leash dog situations at East View Park. You office replied to me that you were aware of the problems, and would put up a sign, and maybe have some form of enforcement. You put up a dogs on leash sign promptly, and I appreciated it. However, it seems that people either ignore it, or think it is ok to have their dogs loose if the dogs are "friendly". There is no way to tell how a supposedly friendly dog would react to another dog's aggressive behavior. As a result, I hear about incidents when a dog bites another dog, or just dogs get into fights. I try to stay away from this park, but I live nearby and occasionally walk my dog. Every time I point out to people with loose dogs that this is not an off leash park, or dogs have to be on leash, I always have unpleasant experiences. People give me negative comments, try to justify themselves or even respond in a hostile way . But if their "friendly" dogs approach my dog and my dog reacts, resulting in a fight, the owners have no way to control their dogs in time. Then I have to act to protect my on leash dog. And if I end up hurting their dogs, do they have a right to blame me? I have not yet seen any action taken by the city to enforce this law. It would be greatly appreciated if your city could come up with some form of enforcement. Thank you very much for your attention, Madoka Verner .m • Matt Waters From: Mona Dill Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:09 PM To: Matt Waters Subject: FW: Eastview Park The email below is the response I sent last week regarding the Eastview dog incident -do you know if there is another email in addition to this? Mona Dill, Recreation Supervisor II Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation & Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 City Hall: 310-544-5266, 310-544-5294 FAX M0N&D@RPV1;A,G0V From: Mona Dill Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:56 AM To: 'hvybags@cox.net' Subject: Eastview Park Dear Ms. Sandell, Our Department is so sorry to hear about the incident you experienced at Eastview Park. It is indeed unfortunate that the patron you encountered was not respectful to you or the park rules. The Recreation and Parks Department will soon be implementing steps to assist with issues such as you described in your email. City Council recently approved additional part-time staffing hours to the Recreation and Parks Department and we will begin recruiting in the near future to have staff on-site at Eastview Park on a part-time basis to assist with enforcing rules. City Council has also approved and set aside funds for a small dog park at Eastview Park. It is our hope that this will help alleviate the existing off -leash problem. In the future, if you would like to receive a quicker response, you may contact the Recreation and Parks Department directly at 310-544-5260. Please note that City Hall is closed on Saturdays and Sundays. Thank you for taking the time to notify us about this unfortunate situation. WE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL AND IF I AM IN YOUR CONTACTS, SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM MONAD@gPV.CO.gM_ TO: 1 197 Mona Dill, Recreation Supervisor II Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation & Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 City Hall: 310-544-5266, 310-544-5294 FAX MONAPPRPICA.GOV PC • Matt Waters From: Cory Linder Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 1:54 PM To: jp@jimparker.us; Matt Waters; Doug Willmore; shane Cc: Kit Fox; Matt Waters Subject: RE: Skate able Plaza RPV City Hall site - facts for proceeding Jim I received your information you sent as well as the information you passed on to Doug this morning. I will be forwarding more questions for you within the next few days. THANKS, CORY From: jp@jimparker.us [mailto:jp@jimparker.us] Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 10:09 AM To: Cory Linder; Matt Waters; Doug Willmore; shane Subject: Skate able Plaza RPV City Hall site - facts for proceeding HI Cory, Thanks for heading up the meeting last week. Since I had some time this weekend I did some work on the skate terrain size needed - population stats using the Public Skate park Development Guide by the Tony Hawk foundation. Page sixteen explains : skaters are from 5 to 24 years old, that .16 per 100 of that age skate. From the PVUSD website: adding up the number of students from each school - total number of students is 11,708 x .16 = 1,873 skaters of school age. It should be simple to agree that there are at least 130 skaters here on the peninsula aged from 19 to 24 years old making the total somewhere slighty over 2,000 skaters. Page 17 calls for a skate park of from 24,000 to 32,000 sg ft. for 2,000 plus skaters. It states that a regional skatepark is in the 32,000 sq ft range so we can argue that our park will not draw a huge amount of out town skaters. Page 16 second to last paragraph points out that when asked what skatepark planners might do differently they will say that they didn't make the skatepark large enough. We need and are asking for 15,000 sq ft of skatepark terrain. Thanks again and please let me know what else you may need. We look forward to getting a agreement on record that we will have permission to proceed and build. 1 skateparkpv.org Respectfully, Jim Parker T 310 372-0770 M 310 213-9975 iimparker.us CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive such information. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of confidential information in this e-mail or its attachments, other than for its intended purpose, is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you. 200 Matt Waters From: Cory Linder Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 4:28 PM To: Suzy Seamans; jp@jimparker.us Cc: Alex Gray; chuck@spbts.org; Chris Strong; Matt Waters; Kit Fox Subject: Skatepark Meeting Follow-up Susan, Jim et al: As we discussed last week at our meeting, I stated that I would provide a list of questions (some of which you have answered), to assist in the development of an agreement between the City and Skatepark PV (SPV). This agreement will ultimately serve as a commitment from both parties: the City recognizing the need and inclusion of a skate park within the Master Plan; and, SPV's commitment to raise funds for such an amenity. Below are series of questions (some more boilerplate than others) that will assist us as well as legal, to develop the best vehicle of an agreement for this project and effort. 1. The name of the organization. 2. The names, address, phone numbers of all the officers and committee members 3. A description of the organization's purpose, proposed project(s), purpose of the project, and how the project falls within the overall objective of the City. 4. The name of the bank where organization accounts will be located and the names of those authorized to withdraw funds and/or transfer funds. 5. Recent financial information (i.e. budget and bank statements) about the organization. 6. A description of the organizations fundraising plans. 7. A plan for funds that are raised but not spent. 8. Proof of insurance, if any. 9. What are the amenities Skatepark PV would like to propose and fund to build at the Civic Center site (i.e. restrooms, parking spaces, etc.)? 10. Will the facility(ies) have lights? 11. What would the optimum square footages of those amenities? 12. What is the appropriate number of parking spaces associated with those amenities (if this was a stand-alone facility)? 13. What is the overall square footage of the land you would like to develop an agreement for? 14. What is the approximate cost of those amenities (individually and collectively)? 15. Does SPV proposed maintain (of funding the maintenance) of the proposed amenities? If so, for how many years? 16. What is the age range of the user group? 17. What are your recommendations for hours of operations? 18. Does SPV feel this will be a 'staffed' facility or more of an open informal use? 19. Are bicycles, scooters, skates, skateboards all allowed at this facility? 20. What form of staffing method are you envisioning? Open with no staff, or staff on site? Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding the questions above. Once we receive the response, we can meet and discuss any discrepancies as well as enter into discussions with the City Attorney's office on how we can develop an appropriate agreement. THANKS, CORY 201 CORY A. LINDER, Director Department of Recreation and Parks City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310.544.5260 WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. IF YOU HAVE ME IN YOUR CONTACTS PLEASE SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM CORYL@RPV.COM TO CORYL@RPVCA.GOV IW Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 7:46 AM To: Ayala Socol; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: No skatepark Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattw@rpvca.gov. Sincerely, Kit Fox, AICP Senior Administrative Analyst City Manager's Office City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 544-5226 F: (310) 544-5291 E: kitf@rpvca.gov WE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM KITF@RPV.COM TO KITF@RPVCA.GOV. -----Original Message ----- From: Ayala Socol [mailto:ayalasocol@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 6:20 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: No skatepark um IF YOU HAVE ME IN YOUR CONTACTS, PLEASE I'm a resident of RPV at 6622 EI Rodeo Rd. and I'm very disappointed at the notion that the city might be putting a skatepark nearby. I am writing to urge you to vote AGAINST such a proposal! With concern, Ayala Socol Sent from my iPhone 203 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 7:47 AM To: E.G. Ryan; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: Skateboard Park at City Hall Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattw@rpvca.gov. Sincerely, Kat Fox, AICP Senior Administrative Analyst City Manager's Office City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 l-lawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 544-5226 F: (310) 544--5291 E: kitf9MVca.gov From: E.G. Ryan [mailto:doodlelisi@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 11:19 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Skateboard Park at City Hall Dear Council Members, My name is Elisabeth Ryan and I am an RPV resident. I am very concerned about the decision to develop a large skateboard park at RPV City Hall. This is something that will not serve the whole community, but only a small percentage of the community. While I understand there is a very minute percentage of our residents who would benefit from such a park, please consider making it in proportion to the demand for such a park. Smaller skate bowls somewhere else, not on the most pristine land left on the peninsula, would be appropriate. IF a project is developed at RPV City Hall, it must be something for everyone. We have mobilized our community -- your voters --and they are upset. In three days I spoke with about 310 of YOUR voters. 300 of them have signed my petition opposing a skateboard park. 99 percent of them had no idea about this skateboard park. Further, the petition is now circulating the whole Peninsula, as well as an online version. Please consider the interests of your WHOLE community. 204 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:41 PM To: Agnew Laura Karr; CC Cc: Agnew Chris; Cory Linder, Matt Waters Subject: RE: Proposed Skate Park in RPV Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattw@rpvca.gov. Sincerely, Kit Fox, AICD Senior Administrative Analyst Citic Manager's Office City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30910 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 544-5226 F: (310) 544-5291 E: kitf@ 7r 2vca.8ov r� .I, i`�\ICI,,i-I,rx-„. From: Agnew Laura Karr [mailto:laurakagnew@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:38 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Agnew Chris <chrislafilm@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Proposed Skate Park in RPV Dear Council Members, We are Chris and Laura Agnew. We live here on the Peninsula and are very concerned about a proposal to develop a large skateboard park at RPV City Hall. First concern: liability costs. Second concern: traffic. Third (and subsequent) concern: property values as a result of increased traffic, pollution, urbanization of land, etc. Fourth: that a "skate kid" culture, while fun, is not of benefit to a majority of residents and, further, would deter current residents from utilizing the facility. Fifth: converting some of the last pristine land into a concrete urban lot ... Smaller skate bowls somewhere else, rather than the most pristine land left on the peninsula, would be appropriate. IF a project is developed at RPV City Hall, please consider something for everyone to enjoy, and do not urbanize more land. 205 The rare and unique beauty of this peninsula is the attraction here -- not a concrete bowl that can be built LITERALLY anywhere else on the planet. Please consider using this rare, remaining bit of beauty in a way that is consistent with its form. Finally, we have signed a petition opposing such a park and strongly urge you to consider the interests of the whole community, and to remember what makes this area unique. Because once it's gone, it's gone. Sincerely, Laura and Chris Agnew 424-206-2512 Laura Karr Agnew 206 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:12 PM To: Swan Wedekind; CC CC: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: *** Please stop skateboard park at City Hall *** Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattw@rpvca.gov. Sincerely, Kat Foy, AICD Senior Administrative Analyst City Manager's Office City of Rancho Palos Verdes 309.40 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 544.-5226 F: (310) 5445291 F,: kitf@ruvca.Aov a .:.#- F" .t ces From: Swan Wedekind [mailto:swanwedekind@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:10 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: *** Please stop skateboard park at City Hall *** Dear Council Members, My name is Swan Wedekind and I am an RPV resident. I am very concerned about the decision to develop a large skateboard park at RPV City Hall. This is something that will not serve the whole community, but only a small percentage of the community. While I understand there is a very minute percentage of our residents who would benefit from such a park, please consider making it in proportion to the demand for such a park. Smaller skate bowls somewhere else, not on the most pristine land left on the peninsula, would be appropriate. IF a project is developed at RPV City Hall, it must be something for everyone. We have mobilized our community --your voters --and they are upset. In three days I spoke with about 310 of YOUR voters. 300 of them have signed my petition opposing a skateboard park. 99 percent of them had no idea about this skateboard park. Further, the petition is now circulating the whole Peninsula, as well as an online version. Please consider the interests of your WHOLE community. Regards, 207 Swan Wedekind (310) 544-1777 Mi Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:46 PM To: Adam Feingold; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: Skate Park Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattw@rpvca.gov. Kit Fox, AICP Senior Administrative Analyst City Manager's Office City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 544-5226 F: (310) 544-5291 E: I<itf@rpvca.gov WE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. IF YOU HAVE ME IN YOUR CONTACTS, PLEASE SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM KITF@RPV.COM TO Ki T F@RPVCA.GOV. -----Original Message ----- From: Adam Feingold [mailto:adam.d.feingold@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:44 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Skate Park >> Dear Council Members, >> My name is Adam Feingold and I am an RPV resident. I am very concerned about the decision to develop a large skateboard park at RPV City Hall. This is something that will not serve the whole community, but only a small percentage of the community. While I understand there is a minute percentage of our residents who would benefit from such a park, please consider making it in proportion to the demand for such a park. Smaller skate bowls somewhere else, not on the most pristine land left on the peninsula, would be appropriate. IF a project is developed at RPV City Hall, it must be something for everyone. >> This was the first time that I heard about the effort and it doesn't appear to be a good use of city property. >> Regards, Adam >> Adam Feingold >> 2 Packet Rd 209 >> Ranching Palos Verdes, CA >> 90275 210 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 2:00 PM To: Katherine Hoy Williams; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: RPV skate board park proposal Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or.mattw@rpvca.gov. Kat Fox, AICD Senior Administrative Anal -II Citty Ma LI s Q{fice City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 544-5226 E (310) 544-5291 E: kitf@ruvca.rov From: Katherine Hoy Williams [mailto:isabellapaloma2@aol.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:54 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: RPV skate board park proposal To Whom It May Concern I am writing to object to the proposed skate park at the RPV city hall site. I'm all for a place for the kids to hang out (I have two kids), but the location is terrible„ I live in the Point Vicente neighborhood and it's already very dangerous to exit Via Rivera Onto Hawthorne, It's quite scary making a left tern to go up the hill. Cars whip down the hill and around the curve traveling too fast. Drivers are :still making illegal U-turns corning up the Hawthorne right at the entrance to Via Rivera, Drivers planning to go to Golden Cove move into the left tern lade for the townhouse complex and then realize it's wrong and pull out again.There's a steep drive coming from the back of Golden Cove center where drivers are making illegal urns out of also. The entrance/exit to the city hall site is situated dangerously also. So many times, drivers pull out, 211 going left or right, with not enough time for the oncoming traffic to see them, Drivers are leaving the dog park with small dogs in their laps and trying to navigate into the speeding traffic - even going up hill. I can't imagine what it would be like with more traffic in this small area alone, and many of those being young drivers. Please reconsider this site for the skate park. 1 am also concerned about the amount of youngsters who will be on a site so close to a very busy road. I also agree with many others in RPV that a skate board park doesn't meet the need of a huge majority of residents. What's the percentage of skateboarders in RPV alone? 212 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 2:44 PM To: Jennifer Brill; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: Skateboard park Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattw@rpvca.gov. Kit Fox, AICP Senior Administrative Analyst City Manager's Office City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30904 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 (310) 544-5226 kitf@rpvca.gov WE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. IF YOU HAVE ME IN YOUR CONTACTS, PLEASE SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM KITF@RPV.COM TO KITF@RPVCA.GOV. -----Original Message ----- From: Jennifer Brill [mailto:jbrill@kw.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 2:21 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Skateboard park I would like to let you know that we do not want a skateboard park in Palos Verdes. Thank you. Jennifer Brill BRILL KNOWS THE HILL Keller Williams -PV 310-766-8441 1 213 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 7:35 AM To: Steven Barryte; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: Community Swimming Pool Thank you for your comments regarding a possible community pool and the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Pian Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattwfflvca.i;ov. Kit Fox, ACCP Citty of Rancho Palos Verdes (310) 544--5220 kitf@rpvca.g ov WE ARE PROCESS ' OF SWITCHING TO A NEW W , " AND EMAIL DOMAIN. �OHAVE iii l , t CONTACTS, PLEASE SWITCH From: Steven Barryte [mailto:sebarryte@cox.net] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 6:40 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Community Swimming Pool RPV City Council: I think a public swimming pool near RPV City Hall is a wonderful idea. The athletic teams have priority at both high school pools. The YMCA administered public access to the school pools for lessons & recreational swimming only during the summer & the hours allocated for free swimming were very limited. A public pool on the hill would be a great year-round asset to the community. I think a large skateboarding facility at City Hall is a bad idea. It would be much better to have small skateboarding facilities at several parks throughout the city rather than one large facility. -Steven Barryte 7010 Starstone Dr RPV 90275 214 Matt Waters From: Cory Linder Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:08 AM To: Matt Waters Subject: FW: Rec and Park recommendations Attachments: 2005 Draft Parks%2C Recreation and Open Space Strategic Plan (PDF)_ 201501051406392094.pdf From: Leanne Twidwell [mailto:leetwid@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 2:37 PM To: Cory Linder Subject: re: Rec and Park recommendations Dear Mr. Linder, Earlier this year, I attended one of your public workshops in which you asked for public input on the future of parkland in Rancho Palos Verdes. At that time, I asked you what had happened to suggestions for a public pool that appeared in the last survey of public opinion taken by city of Rancho Palos Verdes more than 10 years ago. At that time, the residents of RPV listed a public pool at Upper Point Vincente as their number two priority. At the meeting, you said you would review all information available. Looking at the proposed park plan, however, I am led to believe that you never looked at the old proposal. I'm attaching it to this email and I hope you will take a few minutes to note the "yellow sticky notes" I have attached, calling your attention to the information regarding a pool at Upper Point Vincente. You will note that there was even a rough plan for a pool. Additionally, you will note that the Zenith Aquatic Program, the leading aquatic program in the area, volunteered to help raise money for this facility and even followed up with a folder of relevant information for City Council members. As far as I know, the folders disappeared with no further discussion and the idea of a pool was never mentioned again. I note that you have included reference to the concept of a pool at several locations in your new report, but have not included the largest and most logical site, Upper Point Vincente. A pool would serve the needs of ALL residents of the city from the youngest to the oldest (25 per cent of whom are older than 65.) It would provide health and recreational benefits for everyone. A skate park, which you are recommending, meets the needs of a small group of boys (and a few girls) between the ages of 12 and 18. 1 simply cannot imagine 215 how you could even consider taking a major community resource and reserving it for the use of this small group of residents, (worthy but nonetheless small), when you have a chance to serve the needs of all residents with a pool. I am hoping that you can take a few minutes and explain your thinking on this matter. Thank you for taking the time to listen to my thoughts on this subject.) will look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Leanne Twidwell 32 Sweetbay Road Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 310 541-1003 216 Matt Waters From: Nancie Silver Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:14 AM To: Cory Linder Cc: Matt Waters Subject: FW: WARNING TO ALL NEIGHBORS!!!!! No Skateboard Park at RPV City Hall FYI Nancie Silver, Recreation Supervisor Recreation & Parks Department City of Rancho Palos Verdes 310.544,5268 le The City is in the process of switching to a new web and email domain. Please note my new email r if I am in your contacts, please change my email from nancies@rpv.com to nancies@rpvca.gov. Thank you. From: Helen Barnfather [mailto:helenbarnfather@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:55 PM To: Nancie Silver; Mona Dill; Daniel Trautner Subject: Fwd: WARNING TO ALL NEIGHBORS!!!!! No Skateboard Park at RPV City Hall Hi all!! FYI- I just received this. Just thought I would share. -Helen Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Swan Wedekind <swanwedekind(c gmail.com> Date: September 21, 2015 at 9:54:26 PM PDT To: undisclosed -recipients:; Subject: FW: WARNING TO ALL NEIGHBORS!!!!! No Skateboard Parr at RPV City Fall Hi All, There is a plan to build a skateboard park at RPV City Hall. This may have undesired effects for Palos Verdes residents, and some residents are very concerned. There have been a lot of discussions on this topic on NextDoor.com (for Palos Verdes area). Please help support the 217 petition to not bring crowds from all over Southern CA to R -PV for the skateboard park (see below). Thanks! WARNING TO ALL NEIGHBORSHM23h; ago Elisabeth Ryan ifrorn Paios Verdes Dirive South Please take a look at this website. This is the organization that wants to come and put their giant skateboard park on our City Hall property. http://www,skateparkpv.org/?page._id=2027... They are well organized, so we need all the support we can get to STOP this at RPV CITY HALL! PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION and FORWARD it to EVERYONE in RPV YOU KNOWM http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/no-skateboard-park-at- 1.fb50?source=c.fb&r bv=6898968 No Skateboard Park at RPV City Hall Petition by Elisabeth Q Ry 1,11 IIIIWII inriff 11111111 13 M M M = M1 -F skateboard park at Point Vicernte,/Ci�,y Hall' chat does not serve the needs m the Rancho Palos Verdes There are currently 109 signatures. NEW goal - We need 200 signatures! 2 218 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 12:03 PM To: Melody Lomboy; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: No skatepark please Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattw@rpvca.gov. Kit Fox, AICP Senior Administrative Analyst City Manager's Office City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 544-5226 F: (310) 544-5291 E: kitf@rpvca.gov WE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. IF YOU HAVE ME IN YOUR CONTACTS, PLEASE SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM KITF@RPV.COM TO KITF@RPVCA.GOV. -----Original Message ----- From: Melody Lomboy [mailto:melody@lltalent.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:59 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: No skatepark please I oppose the skatepark. I would love for a pool or community center for kids. A small skate area would be fine, however I feel that this privately owned park has been passed by deceiving the citizens of RPV. My family members will not be voting for any council members supporting this I would support a YMCA type of set up instead. Melody Portuguese Bend Sent from Melody's (Phone. Please excuse briefness and errors. 219 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 3:21 PM To: John Schoenfeld; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: Skate Park & Pool Complex "Thank you for your comments regarding a possible community pool and the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council For consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-52.18 or mattw air vca. ov. Kit Fox, AiCJ' Citi] of Rancho Palos Verdes (310) 544-5226 kitfQq�rnyca. oy U.i•. N a i s a ,!1 "• From: John Schoenfeld [mailto:john@jalexanderco.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 3:18 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Skate Park & Pool Complex To Our Mayor and City Council: We have resided in Rancho Palos Verdes for over 38 years, and we are sending our support, by this email, for both the or000sed skate oark and the 000ll cornollex both of which we wholliv approve. Please do not hesitate to respond to this email or call me at 310-375-9731 if you have any questions. Yours truly, John and Victoria Schoenfeld 93 Laurel Drive Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 220 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 7:11 AM To: Sharyn; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: Skate Park Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or.mattw@rpvca.gov. Kit Fox, A.tcp Citic of Rancho Palos Verdes (310) 5.44.-5226 kitf@rpvca.gov From: Sharyn [mailto:sharynm96@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 6:24 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Skate Park Dear Council Members, As an RPV resident, I am very concerned about the decision to develop a large skateboard park at RPV City Hall. This is not something that will serve the whole community, but only a small percentage of the community; therefore, people will be attracted to drive in from other areas which will have an impact on our more rural environment. Is it true that the city council is going to vote on whether to approve this skateboard park on October 6`h? I had no idea about this skateboard park which will affect everyone on the Peninsula even though I signed up to receive notices from the city. A project developed at RPV City Hall should be something that can be of benefit to most of its residents. Perhaps it would be more appropriate to build smaller skate bowls at various parks in the area, but not on the most pristine land left on the peninsula. Please consider the interests of our whole community. Thank you. Sharyn Mcllhargey 24 Nuvola Ct. Rancho Palos Verdes 221 Matt Waters From: E.G.Ryan <doodke|isi@gmai|/onn> Sent: Wednesday, September Z3.2Ol54/1IPM To: Matt Waters; C[ Subject: Re: FW: Skateboard Park atCity Hall By the wozy,l thought the meeting was .- (]uWed, Sep 23, 7015 o14:37PM, E.G. Rv:npootc: Dear Mr. Waters, Twill bring the petition on the day oFthe meeting.lthink the City Council is well aware of this petition. {am not sure exactly why you need it and what your position in all of this is. lcan direct you to the website if you like and you may print it out. Please call me if you would like to discuss this. Lis Ryan 310-383-8923 On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Matt Waters <MattWArpvca. ggv> wrote: Dear Ms. Ryan, Good afternoon. I'm preparing the staff report for the Parks Master Plan update going to the RPV City Council on October 6,201S. 1 have received a large number of emails opposed to a skate park (or a skate park at City Hall) over the last week orso. All of that correspondence, including yours, will be included in the report for Council's consideration. | would like to obtain a copy ofthe petition referenced below toinclude as well. VVnu|d it be possible for you toemail o/mail that tome. Please let meknow ifyou have any questions nrneed any assistance. Sincerely, Matt Waters City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1 �� 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.palosverdes.com/rpv mattw rpvca.gov - (310L5p -- X310) 544-5291 f From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 7:47 AM To: E.G. Ryan <doodlelisi@gmail.com>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Matt Waters <MattW2— rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: Skateboard Park at City Hall Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattes@rpvca.gov. Sincerely, 223 Matt Waters From: Matt Waters Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 8:56 AM To: E.G. Ryan; CC Cc: Cory Linder Subject: RE: FW: Skateboard Park at City Hall Dear Ms. Ryan, Thanks for taking the time to talk with me yesterday. As we discussed, the October 6t" Parks Master Plan staff report that I'm helping to write will include the MoveOn petition in opposition to the skate park. The meeting has not been postponed; it is still scheduled for October 6t". Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions or concerns. Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.palosverdes.com/rpv mattwQa rpvca. ov - (310) 544-5218 p — (310) 544-5291 f WE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. PLEASE NOTE My NEW EMAIL AND From: E.G. Ryan [mailto:doodlelisi@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 4:41 PM To: Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov>; CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Re: FW: Skateboard Park at City Hall By the way, I thought the meeting was postponed... On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:37 PM, E.G. Ryan <doodlelisi@Pmail.com> wrote: Dear Mr. Waters, I will bring the petition on the day of the meeting. I think the City Council is well aware of this petition. I am not sure exactly why you need it and what your position in all of this is. I can direct you to the website if you like and you may print it out. Please call me if you would like to discuss this. Regards, 224 Lis Ryan 310-383-8923 On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Matt Waters <MattWarpvca.gov> wrote: Dear Ms. Ryan, Good afternoon. I'm preparing the staff report for the Parks Master Plan update going to the RPV City Council on October 6, 2015. 1 have received a large number of emails opposed to a skate park (or a skate park at City Hall) over the last week or so. All of that correspondence, including yours, will be included in the report for Council's consideration. I would like to obtain a copy of the petition referenced below to include as well. Would it be possible for you to email or mail that to me. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any assistance. Sincerely, Matt Waters City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.palosverdes.com/rpv mattw@rpvca.gov - (310i 544-52'95 p — (310) 544-5291 f � � �,' Ali i i� �� , (1 G i' � �! �� !; +, � • �, 2 225 From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 7:47 AM To: E.G. Ryan <doodlelisi@gmail.com>; CC <CC r vca.gov> Cc: Cory Linder <CoryL@rpvca.gov>; Matt Waters <MattW@rpvca.gov> Subject: RE: Skateboard Park at City Hall Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattw@rpvca.gov. Sincerely, Senior Administrative Analyst Cittj MarlageY s Office Cittj of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 I4awthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 T: (310) 5445226 1~:.310 5445291 P: kit{@rpvca..8ov 226 PLEASE C ,1 KITF@RPV.COM• w , A y,' From: E.G. Ryan [mailto:doodlelisi@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 11:19 PM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: Skateboard Park at City Hall Dear Council Members, My name is Elisabeth Ryan and I am an RPV resident. I am very concerned about the decision to develop a large skateboard park at RPV City Hall. This is something that will not serve the whole community, but only a small percentage of the community. While I understand there is a very minute percentage of our residents who would benefit from such a park, please consider making it in proportion to the demand for such a park. Smaller skate bowls somewhere else, not on the most pristine land left on the peninsula, would be appropriate. IF a project is developed at RPV City Hall, it must be something for everyone. We have mobilized our community --your voters --and they are upset. In three days I spoke with about 310 of YOUR voters. 300 of them have signed my petition opposing a skateboard park. 99 percent of them had no idea about this skateboard park. Further, the petition is now circulating the whole Peninsula, as well as an online version. Please consider the interests of your WHOLE community. Regards, Elisabeth Ryan ECS Ryan 310-383-8923 31.0-833-3651 227 EG Ryan 310-383-8923 310-833-3651 www.EGRyan.com EGRyanEnterprises@gmail.com EG Ryan 310-383-8923 310-833-3651 www.EGRyan.com EGRyanEnterprisesk gmail.com 228 From: Cory Linder Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:36 AM To: Matt Waters Cc: Daniel Trautner Subject: FW: 67 signers: Support the Self Funded RPV City Hall Skateable Plaza petition fyi From: info@jimparker.us [mailto:petitions@moveon.org] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:22 AM To: Cory Linder Subject: 67 signers: Support the Self Funded RPV City Hall Skateable Plaza petition Dear Cory Linder, I started a petition to you titled Support the Self Funded RPV City Hall Skateable Plaza. So far, the petition has 67 total signers. You can post a response for us to pass along to all petition signers by clicking here: http://petitions.moveon.or /g target talkback.html?tt=tt-99858-custom-62311-20250925-9YX ID The petition states: "Show support for a self funded no cost to tax payers public use skateable plaza at upper Point Vicente Park near the dog park. We need a legal place to skate in Rancho Palos Verdes (RPV)." To download a PDF file of all your constituents who have signed the petition, including their addresses, click this link: http://petitions.moveon.org/deliver�pdf.html?job id=1629901&target type=custorn&target id=62311 To download a CSV file of all of your constituents who have signed the petition, including their addresses, click this link: http://petitions.moveon.org/deliver�pdf.html?job®id=1629901&target type=custom&target id=62311&csv=l Thank you. --info a,jimparkenus If you have any other questions, please email petitions °,moveon. org. The links to download the petition as a PDF and to respond to all of your constituents will remain available for the next 14 days. This email was sent through MoveOn's petition website, a free service that allows anyone to set up their own online petition and share it with friends. MoveOn does not endorse the contents of petitions posted on our public petition website. If you don't want to receive further emails updating you on how many people have 229 signed this petition, click here: http:petitions.moveon.or /- delivery®unsub.hlml?e=x1 V_ 4OpORhyninyz9KOn7ZUmNvcnlsH.Iwdm.NhLmdvd &petition id=99858. 230 Matt Waters From: Kit Fox Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 8:00 AM To: la2wndsrf; CC Cc: Cory Linder; Matt Waters Subject: RE: No Skate park in RPV Thank you for your comments regarding the proposed skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. They will be provided to the City Council for consideration as a part of the Council's review of the Parks Master Plan Update on October 6th. For additional information about the Parks Master Plan Update project, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Matt Waters in the Recreation & Parks Department at (310) 544-5218 or mattes r vca.gov. Kit Fox, AICP City of Rancho Palos Verdc-s (510) 544-5226 kitf9Wvca.6 TTE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. IF YOU HAVE ME IN YOUR CONTACTS, PLEASE SWITCH EMAIL FROM KITF@RPV.COMTOKITF@RPVCA.GOV. From: la2wndsrf [mailto:la2wndsrf@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 8:26 AM To: CC <CC@rpvca.gov> Subject: No Skate park in RPV Dear City Administrators, You will get many emails urging RPV to build a skatepark in RPV city limits. I urge a no vote in that category because of the city of Los Angeles' experience in San Pedro has shown it would be a liability for lawsuits that's because of the extreme bad behavior by the skateboarders from time to time at Peck Park next to Western Avenue. If something is built, then private enterprise to build it, run it, charge admission, and administrate it. This will release RPV of any potential liability losses that will arise from it. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely Scott Carter, Miraleste Canyon Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone 231 Uflous NO SKATEBOARD PARK ON PUBLIC LAND It ts money and does not serve the Community .veli. Rollinq Hills Estates and Palos Verdes Estates have n(? ness in our community for a rediculous private venture - this is not Conev Island'"'. skate park only serves a very small fraction of the comrnunity. I Would be in favor of a community / recreation area that can be used by the broader • 77. Tatyana Burack from Rancho Palos Verdes, ,CA signed this petition on Sep 21, 2015. iNO SKATE PARK in RPv all i P • 76. Scott Burack from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 21, 2015. N0 SKATE PARM 12 a, I 75. Herbert Burack from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep21,2015. INO SKATE PARK in RPV * 74. Anita Khalkhall from Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA signed this petition on Sep 21 1 2015. 0 73. John Locano from RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA signed this petition on Sep 21, 2015. 0 72. Philip Chou from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 21,2015. 71. Nell Holder from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 21,2015. 70. Daniel Giles from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 21,2015. I think it is more ini-tnrtant to kee,,,LLhe d vt!.ai'k than build a skate Pam. 69. Paula Weiner from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition; on Sep 21,2015. 4 • 68. Marylou,,, Sweeney from RanchQ Palos Verdes; CA signedIhis petition on Sep 21, 2015. 233 67. Henry Y Hua from Palos Verdes Estates, CA signed this petition on Sep 21,2015. 66. Lola Fantappie from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on • 21, 2015. 65 Carol hook from Rancho Palos verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 21, 2015. Hooks64. Karin • Palos Verdes,• ! this petition on petitionSep 21, 2015. 63. Richard Ginsburg from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this ! 20, 2015. • 62. Sarah Crabb from Palos Verdes Estates, CA signed this petition on Sep 20, 2015. • 61. Holly Curnaux from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 20, 2015. • 60. Christopher Shane from Rancho Palos Verdes, Cie signed this, petition on Sep 20, 2015. Ino to the skate park! 0 59. Pat Tambini from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on ! 20, 2015. * 58. Melissa Lubofsky from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 20, 2015. bad idea. PLIC in a community poot instead * 57. Carrie from Palos Verdes Estates, CA signed this petition on Sep 20,2015. 0 56. fisa gladstone from RPV, CAsign&d this petition -on Sep 2.0, 2015-11 ( aease don't hrina a skateboard nArk herel 55. Eva cody from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 20., 201 5. 54. Charles Ventura from Palos Verdes Estates, CA signedL this petition on Sep +' 234 Wors! a ever. No one I)enel its from a �,katepark except skate boaruers ages 10- t i. Count o!, til is park being graffified every single night at the expense of the city of RPV Seriously, who carni: yip with such a ctm-!b !dea? pi,.I ;!ris enoug h b. iff, Poii it and the caves -vie don't neec1Q� I al ��, 11 outsiders. the traffic and disruotion of our n A pool would serve mote people. Especially our senior citizens _rI.` t'riomvv,th Oh,:hs- _,IT, VVikipedia regarding rpv "The population was diverse in age terms, with 9,248 people (22.2%) Linder thr- jfp rt i r, 352 people i ricled 16 to 24 1 04,5 people f I a(lod 25 lo 44. 13,344 people (32 0%,)), aged 45 to 64, and 9,654 people: (23.20%) aged 65 or older The niedian age was 47.8 years. That',-, 7? 12 , .vel ` it, Iv ic -,i 24" Oar) 4 4 '-! i;)se ur-(](:r '14 jvr t ;r, 1;�f, ;, - jjoi,l Is small children. Skate board parks detract from a natural park atmosphere- All concrfAt.. 'oud, i1o,r:f(.,p crashing rtril-..a, ;A_i�, AL Akvw� This is a ttirr; the place for a skateboard park. Someplace else, but not there. idea Already too much traffic, congestion and the left turn into city hall is dangerous already. ding more traffic and kids on , Kat��b�)aids is POOI would serve more of the cummm fearpeoplet--) qet killed. ;Ios Verdes, CA si I ey skateboard park serves s the u!v f ea!lv that, a :wl: k will L.ru life -'), its skate • Horrible idea! few 29. ray blank from rancho palos verdes, CA signed this .petition on Sep 20, 2015. 28. Lawrence Liang from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 20, 2015. • 27. Ada Leung from Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 20, 2015. • 26. Steven Barryte from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 20, 2015. �i; G • 25. Thang/� Nguyen from Rancho Palos Verdes,, CA signed this petition ,?n Sep 20? 2015. ('dv !l(_t:Vo t: Yts . �di�lic d .0 ' t . , 6 ,'!7 'i... . �:t+ �'T .. - ar,'� r.n r,�.•�iFi+..rn r.;.-44 {aAI"% f0 C3 rrvr 4 { A. 1 xe.r15.' • 24. Tani Sackler Krouse from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 20, 2015. • 23. Trinhly from Hawthorne, CA signed this petition on Sep 20, 2015. • 22. Archana shah from Rpv, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. • 21. Afsaneh from rpv, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. • 20.. Maria O.tera. from Rancho Palos Verdes, jCA signed this petition ,on Sep 19, 2015. • 19. Ana Haase -Elliott from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. • 18. Peter Cho from RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. _ 237 SKATEBOARD PARK 1. All that concrete, in addition, is the worst thing for our Let's get something on this site that serves the needs of the i�MJWMOIMT ."Frow about a 50 meter think a skateboard park would bring Money would better spent foi a community center. A place where more people could benefit is more beneficial to the whole community rather than aae soecific skateboarder le need a pool and a center for residence to gather. Apply an entrance fee for the pool and the city ill make the money that it thinks it's getting from an investot's one fitne buy Out for a skate park This not good use of "our" land. Rpv needs to go hang out at the skate park at Venice beach and see if ev'd like the sarne for their soace. I think not. 6. Rhonda Bruening from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. 5. Haewon Lee from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. 4. LINH TU from RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. • 3. Melody Lomboy from rancho Palos verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. 2. Melissa Rooke from Rancho Palos Verdes, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. 1. Elisabeth G Ryan from RPV, CA signed this petition on Sep 19, 2015. ` I.I e �!a�2 . ;C`.lil � y 2lr�J ��=ail it: .r^.,. --4vs,)1 qV is :.1,6 1 c:b:1nE'd ,-ic 1� tk" kj _! i' rid': 119whiwr oAnii02 0 _ rr Jr:. i�arf�wifJrl!7IEi7r�'�i(i�.(s�. `� C: no ryEJ{JtJ 239 plef$p sign this petition to stop development of a skate park at Point Vicente/ City Hall The Rancho Palos Verdes City Council has taken several significant steps toward construction of a 15,000 square foot private skate parkat Point Vicente, immediately adjacent to City Hail, including hiring a consultant to assess skate park locations (in 2010), approving the revision of the City's master plan for rec and parks to include skate park'd"opment, directing City managers and staff to spend time conducting a feasibility study/ neighborhood outreach regarding Y the project, and directing the City to petition the National Park Service to allow a land swap to enable skate park construction. A skate park of such proportions will be a regional attraction, attracting skaters from all over andd negatively' impacting our community. Further, such a skate park will prevent further decades old proposals for a pool, gym, and Chric Center, all of which would benefit the community of 42,000 as a whole. A skate park will only benefit a tiny minority. Finally, the City's study of the Skate Park proposal does not address serious liability issues with having a skate park on city land. It i" -trite possible that RPV will be liable for injuries and accidents at the site, considering It is located o ncity property. details: www.rpvca.gov . 240 ED 243 244 245 246 247 249 250 251 252 �Lslgrt this petition to stop dew Council has taken several significant steps Uh City Hail, including hiring a consultant to arse include skate park development, directing Cit the project, and directing the City to petition , proportions will be a regional attraction, at rt prevent further decades; old proposals for a p park will only benefit a tiny minority, finally, i park on city land, it is quite possible that till`. NamePhone Numii i ..6, l* Ai i F1 i r4 .i 5 ' � "t 5 253 PL siert this e"On to stop devoopirnel Council has taken several significant steps toward coni City Hall, including hiring a consultant to assess skate I include skate park development, directing City managi the project, and directing the City to petition the Nath proportions will be a regional attraction, attracting prevent further decades old proposals for a poolf gym, park will only benefit a tiny minority. Finally, the Cat's park on city land. Its quite possible that RPV will be Ii 254 Name phone Number -d Ile lat., fL �.a a_ hi e � 3 . i .. �. .: ''4'„.� F i I —21 $, details: www.rpvca.gov t r�Y air .swb Yd q an 254 B` 5 -d Ile r hi � 3 . i 4OLrIIIn�fOoI-I=matlon contract Elisabeth Rya details: www.rpvca.gov 254 255 256 257 council has taken several significant s City Hall, imfuding hiring a consultant the project, and directing the proportions will be a regional a prevent further decades old pr PAA VOW only rue t a tiny M Pirk or CItV land. it 4 quite pd'; �VJ�i n A• I 4"Vi 04KAMOLK""�.t A;Ja34&k details. .rpvcatov 258 / b 23 Please sign this petition to go; Council has taken several significant st3 City Hall, including firing a consultant 1 include skate park development, chreo the project, and directing the City to p{ proportions void be a regional attra tld prevent further decades € ld proposals park- will only benefit a tiny minority. parkon city land, It Is quite possible tf mar" I zy Dear Cory Linder, Parks and Rec director RPV, We are pleased to present you with this petition affirming this statement: "Show support for a self funded no cost to tax payers public use skateable plaza at upper Point Vicente Park near the dog park. We need a legal place to skate in Rancho Palos Verdes (RPV)." Attached is a list of individuals who have added their names to this petition, as well as additional comments written by the petition signers themselves. Sincerely, skateparkpv.org MoveOn.org 267 A safe, legal place to skate is for everyone's benefit! It will give young people more confidence as adults to be given this park. Jamie Chan Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 25, 2015 Jenny Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 Sep 24, 2015 as a founding member and a leader in Develpment of active recreation for the community, it is important that out city leaders embrace skate boarding as a sport and looked at as a crime. The development (founding member of all efforts with successful development) SaN pedro Skate park at peck park if you Build it rent will come.. And so they did. John m Mavar Rancho palos verdes, CA 90275 Sep 24, 2015 Dana Gherardi Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274-4303 Sep 23, 2015 Safer than skateboarding in the streets and a fun time for the Grand kids Randy Mckay Torrance, CA 90505 Sep 22, 2015 Michael zeitlin rancho palos verdes, CA 90274 Sep 22, 2015 We need this park. Jack Good Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 22, 2015 Michael Trutanich Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 MoveOn.org 2 •i DONT ALLOW THE FEW TO DESTROY THE NEEDS OF SO MANY. The majority want this park for the children to have a place to go. This park can be designed to be aesthetically pleasing to the surroundings with minimal noise. I took the time to research this issue and know this as a fact. Deborah Davis Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 Skateboarding is a globally recognized sport not a crime. RPV kids need a safe and legal place to skateboard. This debate has been going on for far too many years. Just build the skatepark! Debra St. Pierre Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 21, 2015 Gloria Kim Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 Sep 21, 2015 Skating is a sport. And Sports should be supplied by communities, peoples and organizations. Youf friend, Mic Michaela Maylander Stuttgart, Germany Sep 21, 2015 Criss Sledge Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Sep 21, 2015 Lat the kids have a great place to skate! Rhonda Levine redondo Beach, CA 90277 Sep 21, 2015 I raised my children in rpv, they were into roller blading but there was nowhere to enjoy it. The city should support this skate park and encourage outdoor play. Sandy Lahti Redondo Beach, CA 90278-2151 Sep 21, 2015 Jim Gormley PVE, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 Travis McKay MoveOn.org 3 269 Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Sep 21, 2015 Rob Chambers Redondo beach, CA 90277 Sep 21, 2015 Who is this clown? This is the best thing that could happen for PV. Dane Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 Angela Springer Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 Jenny McKay Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 MATT RUSSO Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 21, 2015 Ian McDonald Palos verdes estates, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 Kim tobias PVE, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 Kathryn Arafat Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 Kelly Jonas rancho palos verdes, CA 90275 Sep 21, 2015 Scot Oschman Lomita, CA 90717 Sep 21, 2015 tony schreiner Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 21, 2015 MoveOn.org 4 270 yvonne schreiner rancho palos verdes, CA 90275 Sep 21, 2015 Jesse Blatz Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Sep 21, 2015 Brandon Kawashima Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 20, 2015 Would you rather have our kids destroying public property and running from security and police? Skateboarding is and will continue to be seen as a negative activity so long as uninformed citizens reinforce that it is a rebellious way of life to our youth. This only pushes them to the outskirts of society where the true riffraff and delinquents exist. This forces our young and impressionable skateboarders to associate with less than desirable kinds of people which will in turn lead them into to real acts of crime and or drug use. Enough with the rigid view of what is an acceptable sport. Our youth should be lifted up and encouraged to pursue their dreams, and if that involves four wheels and a piece of wood than let it be. tim james maier pvp, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 We been needing a skate park !!! We are the people, we all have rights just like you! We need safe place for the kids! Take them off the streets where they can be in danger to other things. Jose Arias Monzon palos verdes peninsula, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Brennan Losey Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 20, 2015 Shahrzad Bazargan RPV, CA 90275 Sep 20, 2015 This should not even be a question. Kids deserve a place to skate. Recreation is part of development and creativity and imagination; all things that contribute to a better culture and a better world. Naseem Bazargan RPV, CA 90275 Sep 20, 2015 Stacy Blatz Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 MoveOn.org 5 271 Sep 20, 2015 Kristin Borden PALOS VERDES PENINSULA, CA, CA 90274-1620 Sep 20, 2015 Colleen daniels Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Maya navarra Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Megan Nicholls Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Tory Todaro PVE, CA 99274 Sep 20, 2015 Build the park Kevin Catlin PVE, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 This a public skate plaza that will not cost taxpayers any money. Our local youth need a place skate board. We have FIVE golf courses, 70 plus tennis courts, all the other sports fields. It will serve our kids for 20 years of their life , from the inportant ages 4 to 24 ! not like 2 or 3 years for a baseball, football field etc. WE need this skate facility. skateparkpv.org Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Tracey lee Palos Verdes estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Sarah Cardenas Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Devon Thurlow palos Verdes estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 MoveOn.org 6 272 Jennifer kelly RPV, CA 90275 Sep 20, 2015 Jessica O'Rourke Palos Verdes Est, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Cathy Fresch Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 We need a skatepark! Arun Gattu Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Erin Booker Long Beach, CA 90804 Sep 20, 2015 Our youth , on the peninsula, need a place to skate freely. They need a place to enjoy their sport, without worrying that the police are going to show up & kick them out. Libby Thomas Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 James Brown Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Emily Brown Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 conny Munich, Germany Sep 20, 2015 Skating is a wonderful sport, providing a feeling of freedom and connection with other skaters and should be supported! sarah warnaar Amsterdam, Netherlands Sep 20, 2015 MoveOn.org 7 273 Brigitte Doppler United States 80799 Sep 20, 2015 I fully support a skatepark for the kids! Bruno Koepf Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 I support the skatepark! Sara Wilson Palos verdes estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Alessandra Salguero Los Angeles, CA 90003 Sep 20, 2015 Brennen Bates Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 Brandon Yavas Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 20, 2015 Laurie Gray Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 20, 2015 Michelle Zak Torrance, CA 90503 Sep 20, 2015 I fully support the building of a self funded skate facility next to the dog park at RPV City Hall site. Our youth need a legal place to skateboard. Thank you. Zo Saenz Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Sep 20, 2015 info @jimparker.us Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 Sep 20, 2015 MoveOn.org 8 274 Petitioning City of Rancho Palos Verdes RPV Needs a Poon Ana Elliott Rancho Palos Verdes, CA The city of Rancho Palos Verdes is developing a 10 -yr. master plan for recreation and parks. We want to urge the city to construct a public pool on the Upper Pt. Vicente city property (City Hall) to be used by residents of all ages. The city's Coastal Vision Plans of 1989, 2004, and 2008, all included the plan to construct a public pool. The need for a pool would enable the city to offer water safety courses, swimming lessons, aquatic sports, and leisure for its residents. Now is the time to bring this vision to fruition for the benefit of our community. LETTER To Citta of Rancho Palos Verdes Sign this petition 220 supporlera '180 neoduc to react: SOG Ana Elilolt signed this petition United States.} f Share with Facebook friends W Display my signature on Change.org By signing, you accept Chan.^, org's terms of service and nrivacv nnliry and —pp to r-wp nrca<i—1 275 MIT, ;'Tm" W .1 Al 4 c i - n City of Rancho Palos Verdes Greetings, 276 Signatures Name Location Date Ana Elliott Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Julie Foley Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Paula Weiner Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Robert Elliott Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Janet Chen Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Elisabeth Ryan Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Wendy Peterson Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Tylan McMichael Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Ruipin Wang Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Stacie Reil Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 ORAWAN SITBURANA Rolling Hills Estates, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Rosie Mendez Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-19 Janet Feigle r palos verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Lori Ketkar Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Steven Barryte Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Marcia Luce Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Marissa Morse Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Ashley Wolfson private notte I I i ngyou, NJ, United States 2015-09-20 Carrie Miller Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Brandon Dye Queens Village, NY, United States 2015-09-20 Nia Kontes Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Yoon lee Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Matthew Glavas Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Praveen Gattu Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Agnieszka Gattu Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Kim Vokolek Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Tara Shao Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Tina Creighton Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Yasiu Kruszynski Chicago, IL, United States 2015-09-20 Linda Baek Rancho PALOS Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 277 Name Location Date Swan Wedekind Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Gerald Wedekind Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Leanne Twidwell Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 melody lomboy rhe, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Lauren Emily Stanford, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Billy Lee Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Afsaneh ghaffari Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Peter Cho Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Nina Ota Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Marcia Barryte Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Shu -Ling Wang Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Alice Ong Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Dorcey Oshiro Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Liza Ko Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 rpm JUT Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Ho Chung Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Sandi Randle Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Joyce Yeh Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Anne -Marie Lunde Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Jenny tholan Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Sharon Olson Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Susan Schilz Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Heesoo Lee RPV, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Christina Penuel Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Lellany Hodjat Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Heidi Nicolls Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Mary Russo Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 David Potter Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Kristine Maniaci Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Linh Tu Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Ann Hurrell Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Linda Kurt Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 278 Name Location Date DeAnne Preyer Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Robin Kegler San Pedro, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Isabel Irawan Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Ryan Coons Madison, AL, United States 2015-09-20 drina Semenjuk Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Melissa Lubofsky Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Becky karimann Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Katie Draffen Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Shelly Milam Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Erica Buck Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Laura wetzel Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Jennifer Snaguski Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Nicole Martinez Wilmington, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Samantha Weiss Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Virendra Kadakia Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Joseph Reinisch Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Laura maloney Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Supriya Gianchandani Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Tamar shetty Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Julie Wood San Pedro, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Mandi shapiro Torrance, CA, United States 2015-09-20 Rachel Draffen Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Joanne baeza Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Janice Wu Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Nik Lachowicz Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Christine kruse Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Saemi Yook Lizella, GA, United States 2015-09-21 Stella Peyton Solana Beach, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Victoria Hsu Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Angela Chen Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 John Locano Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Haya Lapuente Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 279 Name Location Date Kelly Colomer Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Jaubin Nguyen Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Nathalie Mills San Pedro, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Nora Fu Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Stephanie Santoro Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Wendy Wattson Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Brenda Martinelli Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Claudia Yancheson Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Jeff Burrage Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Giselle Pomeranc-Mayer Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Katarzyna Skracic Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Kerry Nadal Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Nicholas Sims Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Sara Robinson Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Chris Sims Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Raymond Beverly Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Nelson Valderrama Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Kristine Twomey Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Devender Reddy Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 John Traxler Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Lindsey Crismon Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Brad Gold Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Seema Anand Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Terri Handlen Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Bill Leach Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Michele Inaba Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Jennifer Haley Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Mandi Leonard Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-21 Barbara Maynard Rolling Hills Estates, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Anna D'Arcy Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Brad Schultz Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Marie Brown Manhattan Beach, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Name Location Date Adam Feingold Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Connie Moseley Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Patti Kaupp Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Peter Haase Trabuco Canyon, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Marie Gallien Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Karla Huff Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Kathryn Hansen Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Maria Theresa Loneza Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Kieran Callanan Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Evelyn Callanan Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Nicole Cha Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Lydia Ho Rolling Hills Estates, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Jason Gallien Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Winston Chang Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Soyun Lee Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Jennifer Coll Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Felicia Lee Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Anna Littleford Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Katarina Murillo Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Lora Ackermann Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Kelly Masuda Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Knef Lizaso Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Ruth Tello Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Jeffrey Sims Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Mi-Kyung Lee Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Ruth Urasaki Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Tracy Gordillo Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Roksolana Vecerek Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Wendy Ytterboe Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Anna Avelino Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Janice Pon-Ishikawa Redondo Beach, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Anne Chiang Rolling Hills Estates, CA, United States 2015-09-22 281 Name Location Date Lisa Waldo Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Josephine do Irvine, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Diane Imbach Palos Verdes Estates, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Carla Kotoyantz Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Grace Liu Torrance, CA, United States 2015-09-22 GABRIELA PENA Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Katherine Skaggs Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-22 Kim Ishikawa Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-23 Karen Wedekind Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-23 Charlotte Oduro Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-23 Jane chen Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-23 Julie Ito Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-23 Nichola Roensch Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-23 Tony Hung Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-23 Julie Zhang Huntsville, AL, United States 2015-09-24 Lorraine Tom Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-24 Jordan Kamnitzer Los Angeles, CA, United States 2015-09-24 Melinda Costley Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-25 June Treherne Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-25 Philip Chou Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-25 Trudy Bragg Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-25 Jayne Mahtani Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-26 Toni Lubofsky Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-26 Reagan Hartman Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-26 Marie Chura Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-27 Anu Sood Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-27 Alex bemis Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, United States 2015-09-28 Kim Lindquist Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-28 Melissa McKnight Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-28 john choi Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, United States 2015-09-29 Please sign this petition to support the construction of a public pool facility in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Our city is developing a master plan for recreation and parks at this time. The Coastal Vision Plan of 1989, 2004, and 2008, all included.the need for a city pool. Help us raise awareness for this need and support this cause. Thank you! For information Conti 283 Please sign this petition to support the construction of a public pool facility in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Our city is developing a master plan for recreation and parks at this time. The Coastal Vision Plan of 1989, 2004, and 2008, all included the need for a city pool. Help us raise awareness for this need and support this cause. Thank you! Name OCA -5 Vv ' U,,3,re�/ v.LtU1/�^ Z c For information contat Please sign this petition to support the construction of a public pool facility in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Our'city is developing a master plan for recreation and parks at this time. The Coastal Vision Plan of 1989, 2004, and 2008, all included the need for a city pool. Help us raise awareness for this need and support this cause. Thank you! For information contacl 285 Please sign this petition to support the construction of a public pooifdciiity in the city of Rancho Palos Verdes. Name ---------------- ------------------------------------- ------------ -------- ------------ ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 3 4 A'WCAAPO'JOA"J� -- ---------- ------- --------------- ---- J __ - -- - - --------------- ---- 7 Gl f e. U1 - 8 ---------------------------------------------- -- ------------------ --------- U1, N ---- ------------------------------------ --- 9. ---- ------- - — ------ 10 12 13 WL - 14 ......................... 15 ------- - - --- --- -- ...... --------------------- --------------------- --- -------- 16 --- Y6�r -v -------- -fit o- -- --------- ----------- 17 -------------------- - 18 -------- ------ ---4--------------- ----------------- 20IJ lauri-i-ko ki"iLA-4L- I k-C2L. 21 22 --- IMF`inn *-vv ----------------- -2---3--- - ...... rA�- -------A-------(-k�s -------------------- 24 -----A--- - --------- 25 Phnna No ++c, ( o- vA -IT1 G Please sign this petition to support the construction of a public pool facility in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Our city is developing a master plan for recreation and parks at this time. The Coastal Vision Plan of 1989, 2004, and 2008, all included the need for a city pool. Help us raise awareness for this need and support this cause. Thank you! Name For information contac 287 Nathan Zweizig From: Teresa Takaoka Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:43 AM To: Nathan Zweizig Subject: FW: Parks Master Plan -- presentation contents Attachments: Freeman Master Plan Update for CC 06 30 15.pdf Here is the powerpoint to be added to late correspondence Teri From: John Freeman [mailto:jrfree@cox.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 10:36 PM To: Carla Morreale; Teresa Takaoka Subject: Parks Master Plan -- presentation contents Hello Carla and Teri, Please include my attached PowerPoint presentation document in the "Late Correspondence" material for the June 30, 2015 City Council meeting public input. Thank you. John Freeman, President Pacific View Homeowners Association www.palosverdes.com/pacificview „Working Together for a Setter Neighborhood„ John Freeman, Pacific View Homeowners Assoc. 06/30/2015 WWq1W,} �-F - - : `.. �r s ♦.. rr Y cif ^ 1 a t ? "It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect, and enhance its natural resources, beauty, and open space for the benefit and enjoyment of its residents and the residents of the entire region. Future development shall recognize the sensitivity of the natural environment and be Photo by John Freeman Pacific View HOA accomplished in such a wrin4er as to maximize thg pgotectio�nr "of it. , T_ xNovember 12. 2010 - • . ; ` .<.. t; ``: ,1 '� l. _ M �t''�:i! .�� "i� �-3W�i.l'r3f �! �c �i...L:'tib: �Y.4�X'ilf..l L' S� i R:'��Y:.' .. ! .r►1 w -..':��¢ r�-�.S � _ 'i:: A�,�id�� "� ' 290 291 Picnicking at Upper Hesse Park, Sunday, April 18, 2015 -�. %-VA �i A;:�� d . :::�t � .A p �� ,.wwt •'� y. AW ' 4k: Picnicking at Upper Hesse Park, Sunday, April 18, 2015 r'toMii�T� .l •! •� IP 1"MOR- � '�� ;. mss. ,:�, A �� `d�, �� l ,�'�►r,�i�'°�::` st 3 G'�iWr- '�1,iC � � � � y• �. owigaL-_. all r Picnicking at Lower Hesse Park, Sunday, April 18, 2015 mob. MW 0 Mimi" ■l __ _i-•� � .�--9 _ '�x.;1? Tom,: 1'1 ., - _ � -J[• . r "It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect, and enhance its natural resources, beauty, and open space for the benefit and enjoyment of its residents and the residents of the entire region. Future development shall recognize the sensitivity of the natural environment and be ' Photo by John Freeman Pacific Vlew$HOA accomplished iin?such a manner�yas�to maximize thg proeci°n of it�.'l�+_=3i r" „ November 12, 22010 ' D•.•:fJ.-.:,�'.oy�.1SJ':` 6/30/2015 Compensation for Extended Outages I PG&E "7RGENCY Safety About Search ;_, My ` '✓ L MY BUSINFSS i, f USI " ,.. 11 & Account Servicr - _S Uutati, Additional Language & Speech Program applies to residential customers only (rate schedules E- Servire� ,._ C omperi lli n { r 1-Xtended OuUl o—) Energy i.noice may be enrolled in programs such as CARE and medical baseline. Energy Systern Status STORMS MESSAGE; if a residential customer and have gone -- without power for at least QS hours clue to severe storm conditions, you Brochure-, &e Forms may qualify for a payment under PG&E's Safety Net Program. This PG&E Contacted Me program provides for the automatic payment of $25 - $100, which is Contact Us paid about 60 days following the storm outage. In some cases, Departing Load Processing may take 90-120 days (heavy storm season). Underground Conversion While our crews and emergency response teams at PG&E do everything Share My Data they can to keep the tights on, there are rare occasions when Mother Moi e Services Nature impacts our ability to keep power flowing to every one of our r customes. distribution System. We understand how inconvenient it is for customers who go without power for 48 hours or longer due to severe events, such as a storm. That is why PG&E created the following: Call our outage hotline at 1-888-PGE-4PGE or 1-888-743-4743 to speak with someone about your particular outage. PG&Ewilt provide payments to residential customers we determine were without power for more than 48 hours due to a severe storm. The payments wit( range from $25 up to $100, depending on the length of the outage, Of course, PG&E is working to minimize the potential for outage problems in the future, While we cannot guarantee that Mother Nature wilt never behave badly, we can tell you, day and night, over 20,000 men and women are focused on providing our custorners with responsive service at fair prices. We are constantly working to improve and strengthen our electric system and find ways to safeguard -against future outages. j Additi0nat Info F ) I Outage Compensation EAt1 I Eligib1Ifty The Storm Inconvenience Payment provision of the Safety Net Program applies to residential customers only (rate schedules E- 1, E-6, E-7, E-8, F-9, FM, ES, ESR, ET, and EV); customers also may be enrolled in programs such as CARE and medical baseline. Businesses, agricultural accounts, multi -family building common areas, streetlights, and all other customers other than residential customers are ineligible for Storm Inconvenience Payments. Storm Inconvenience Payments will not be issued to customers in areas where access to PG&E's electric facilities was blocked (mud slides, road closures or other access issues). Also, if customer equipment prevented restos at or extended customer outage (ex. weatherhead, service drop, etc.). The outage must have occurred during a major weather-related event that caused significant damage to PG&E's electric distribution System. "the outage must have tasted more than 48 hours. AND tth>atrf: ,a , ;ttp"r `)r THE RECOFlCs Ai Storm Inconvenience Payments are in increments of $25 ($10030 �S r Cl))t)NCIt. Mi-`-T'Iltilt:i C?�_„r, maximum per event). Payment levels are based on the length of {;6 Gi(_^,f= O THE CITY CLEM,' the customer's outage: (."ARIA '/:rw;i tEALE, CITY CI_i' 48 to 72 hours 25 L 72 to 96 hours $50 96 to 120 hours $75 http://www.pge.com/erVm yhomeladdservices/energystatus/extendedotAagesrindex.page 1`1A 296 6/3012015 Compensation for Extenders Outages ( PG&E 120 hours or more $100 Both bundted service and direct -ac( - ;;a k :rr, Q. L lfy for_Sto is"IconVenienCP. Paymenas, Storm Inconvumencc i'avments wilt he issued to Inn, customer of record. A customer with multipte residentiat services such as a primary residence and a vracahon home is etigiNe for Swl m hu:envenience Payments at each location where there was a storrn-retateci outage of rnore than 48 hours, Customers must have, -art open account (service agreement) in good standing} at the time of the outage and a, the time payment is issued (generalty 45 to 6C days after the event), For master-rttetered accounts such as mobile home parks: the customer of record wilt receive the Storm Inconvenience Paymont for the rnaster meter only, Nofvr who ex mrience an _e ended o,ttage not t=W.ed tc a sty, rn rm severe eve r -ay i;e :-'qrt?t- for thpS vicea P!�a. �rogratn Fight gtcbat y Usage Ar .�. warming by See your energy �r screwing In a � ;� � t.r� usage hasedonhrne, g . See 1 greenertight bulbcosts oreven the future with weather. 4rinL nus rn arcs : t - � i a 5rn art tarld a ow Ct'Lc. ce e i r, P +i',acym,5e i ,�Iiiy cunlavt Us Nowsroam Reouiation CJ f'txific GDE & L12Cn;C Com; any htip:tlwww.pge.com/eri/myhDmaladdservices/energystatus/extendedoWagesAridm-page 2/2 297 COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION FOR TRACT 16540 Portuguese Bend Club East 4100 Palos Verdes Drive South Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 Petition to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes A•Council Gateway The Board of Tract 16540 and the homeowners object to the plans for Gateway Park off Palos Verdes Drive South in the Portuguese Slide Area for the following reasons: 1. The proposed parking lot will create traffic hazards from cars, motorcycles and trucks pulling_ horse_ trailers as they make right and left turns into and out of the parking lot. These hazards add to those that already exist because the road is narrow, curvy, and hilly and the surface is constantly moving creating challenging driving conditions (uneven surfaces and cracks). 2. The proposed parking lot will generate more foot traffic along and across PV Dr S. creating hazards for drivers and risks to the pedestrians. 3. More social media attention to our area may result in the small 40 car parking lot being overwhelmed by non-residents on weekends and holidays and undermining the wonderful area we all pay taxes to enjoy. 4. The increase in visitors to the Portuguese Bend slide area increases the risk of brush fires from careless smokers or use of fire pits. The increase of visitors will also result in more trash carelessly discarded and graffiti on signs, fences and even the natural rocks and soil. 5. The parking lot is intended to be for visitors to be able to park, hike and ride horses along the trails in the City's Reserve on the inland side of the road, Our concern is many people will use the same parking lot to access the beach across the road even though there are no trails there. 6. The Portuguese Bend slide area and beach present natural hazards that may result in injuries and drownings. It is rough terrain that is constantly moving with crevasses and fissures in the soil and a very rocky coastline with strong ocean currents. There will be no life guards on station or any other supervision of activities. Thus, the undersigned request that plans for Gateway Park be abandoned. RECEIVED FROM AND MADE A PART OF THE RFC RC1 AT THE COUNCIL MEETING OF C 0 OFFICE OF THS CITY CLERK CARLA MORREALE, CITY CLERK -T— jigh name Date M U V, Print name & street address jign name date Print nam b & street address )icjTdame DalieL Print name & street address -Sh 0 Vee�p'l 1; I -- Print name & street address giff Ta m el Print name & street-aAddre name ell Kzi e i, A4 a E 41 Date Dair� Date Drint names street adds 3, 14?� Print name & street address 299 Sign name"' �r Dat 1, (� vv iJ Ulrs VA 1 F1 Print n�We & stet address n name Date Print name & street address mama _`�'vJ A� in name J IA— zwa'i I A. Date , 3-/r Date Print name & street address ` 13, �. jn name Date -)41 Oel(i` C, Pv Print name & street address gn namp.- s V Date UIS . ?_kV\,6 fit;' Y" c Print name & street address Date Dat 300 171 - An name Dr;r%+ nnm— J?f &Mme4 9e4r4re Print name &(street address Date S - Date gn name Date C-Z�l i 2w� A, nylo 46 "'rint name & L ,,§'reet address ignnameL, A, -WV Ute "rint name & street address jn name Orint name & street address I ,n name �-Upouatllk PrinOT"m & street addres me a q /-,-' v � --s 45r) name & street address I Date /o ?/j exer xb App (2 /-6, Ua —te 7— Date Date 301 ,n name r1rint name & street address Al Date in name Date Print name & street address ,twname, ate & street address j n name Date I�A Print name & street address 21. Sign name Date Print name & street address 22. Sign name Date Print name & street address 23. Sign name Date Print name & street address 24. Sign name Date Print name & street address S, -- Lob ZI Date Print name & street address ign ate I& -,p5 1 ,moleJ Vr. v, El -Ik4 to A I rn cr-_ I . 7ftj Print name & street address 4. Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6. Sign name Date Print name & street address. 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 303 304 ',rgn nar re' Ado 41r, 4- Zddress, Date 1 n tmq & street ,,gn name Datte q j qg q8d 4 9 Print name & street address 35. Sign name Date Print name & street address 36. Sign name Date Print name & street address 37. Sign name Date Print name & street address 38. Sign name Date Print name & street address 39. Sign name Date Print name & street address 40. Sign name Date Print name & street address 304 sign name' Date Print name & street address �� r 11 " rr 4 Jign n '-, Date df # vvt; Print name & street address 3. Sign name Date Print name & street address 4, Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Print name & street address rl Date Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 305 '9gn name Print name &street address 2. Sign name Z/ -�- ®ate Date Print name & street address 3. Sign name Date Print name & street address 4. Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address C. Sign name Date Print name & street address 7._ Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 306 sign name /-,v ., / c IM, 11,1611MI 19 f.v Date 2. Sign name Date Print name & street address 3. = Sign name Date Print name & street address 4. --- Sign name date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6. Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print, name & street address 307 . �name Date A . . Print name & street address in n_- as e Date Printname& street address 3. Sign name Date Print name & street address 4. Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6. Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address Me din nares 4t2 111,4Af Z4-) CZA 1-15�, A 71 Print name & street addrVss tl 4griname Date —2 Dto/-T- Print name & street address 3.— Sign name Date Print name & street address 4. Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6. Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 309 oign name Date Orint name & street address ign name Date 64 Ji� ),�Jl I jz, I, --int name & strut address .4n name Date Print name & street address 4,___ -- - Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6. Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 310 ami � D fie Print name & street address 2. Sign name Date Print name ,& street address 3. Sign name Date Print name & street address 4. Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6. Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 311 .ign n,. Date Print name & street address 2. Sign name Date Print name & street address 3. Sign name Date Print name & street address 4. Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6. Sign name Date Print name &street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address p m. 312 Si6n na e R,�BAR-A4 A, PQ Date /6 CA orint name & street address lo - i ce 'Sig nn Date �U 2 - AA) z5 Ai3) Al A AJ Pcd- P,-- P!/ Print name & street address 3. Sign name Date Print name & street address 4. Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6. Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 313 jign name Date 477n?c- OV, 61A 90X75- Prinl( .,,gnYMme Date ee,.j Po-rv,,i 'i U l2tOV I CA 9 VA -45- V me Print name & street addj*A S ilname Print name & street address 9 Date Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6. Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 314 Sign name/ �15 at Tint dame & street address e Date Print name & street address 3. Sign name Date Print name & street address 4. Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Date Print name & street address 6.---- Sign name Date Print name & street address - 7. Sign n.prne Date 8. Sign -name--- Date Print name & street address 315 on name Print name & street address Print name & street address 3. Sign name Pr,-+ street address Date Date Date Ua- e 4/ Print name & street address 5-5 Is sign name Date vs k"YAlcovz" Print name & street address Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name 5—ate Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 316 name Date o/s '110 / 'S&A (44 C)xj.e Llo Print name & street address 2. Sign name Date Print name & street address 3. Sign name Date Print name & street address 4. Sign name Date Print name & street address 5. Sign name Print name & street address Date 6. Sign name Date Print name & street address 7. Sign name Date Print name & street address 8. Sign name Date Print name & street address 317 CITY OF bok& RANCHO PALOS VERDES TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: DEPUTY CITY CLERK DATE: JUNE 30, 2015 SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA** Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material presented for tonight's meeting: Item No. Description of Material C Letter from Mark Blackburn 2 Emails from: Mickey Rodich; the Palos Verdes Park Place Homeowner's Association; Bill and Marty Foster; Sunshine; Herb Stark; Madeleine McJones; Oliver Hazard; Email exchange between: Senior Administrative Analyst Waters and Sue Mittlestaedt; Senior Administrative Analyst Waters and John Schoenfeld Respectfully submitted, 0!11� Teresa Takaoka ** PLEASE NOTE: Materials attached after the color page(s) were submitted through Monday, June 29, 2015**. WAAGENDA\2015 Additions Revisions to agendas120150630 additions revisions to agenda.doc 318 From: Lauren Ramezani Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:16 PM To: Carla Morreale Cc: Teresa Takaoka; Michael Throne; Doug Willmore Subject: FW: letter Attachments: SKM_364e15063014570.pdf The attached letter, Late Correspondence is from Mark Blackburn from UWS, Lauren Ramezani Sr, Administrative Analyst- Public Warks City of Rancho Palos Verdes 3.10-5445245 LaurenL@rpvca.grLv www.rfavc�v_ ****The City has a new web and email domain. I have a new email address. Please update your records. Thanks ***** From: michelle[mailto:michelle@uwscompany.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 2:57 PM To: Lauren Ramezani Subject: letter Hi Lauren, Mark asked me to send this over. Thank you for everything and it's been a pleasure working with you these past 11 years O Michelle Newsham r..n,i.c.l elle_(,-tayscco. 77pcu.l7t� i c n...t Bins -Roll -offs s &11orfuNe Tb lets 3-''3-584-7520 (Pho)e) 62-20,S-9237 O IX) C. 319 9010-9016 Norwalk Blvd,, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 RO, Box 3038, Whittier, CA 90650 562-941-4900 . . . . . . . . . . . ONWVWERSALWAS YXE� LARUi kN*U4H 10 SCjfVE, 3MA6k %N*VOH VO GAftg June 10, 2015 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 I'lawthorrie Bl,vd, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275-5391 Mayor and City Councilmembers, Universal Waste Systems, Inc. (UWS) has been honored to serve the City of Rancho Palos Verdes for the past I I years. I personally apologize for not making the niecting tonight. My father was placed on hospice today. I am thank4`01 for all of the support that we have received frorn the community. .1 am proud to have been a part of this City of Rancho Palos Verdes, We have serviced a very unique service area, and we are: committed to making sure that this is a srnooth transition. Our employees will work. closely with. Edco and its stall" Should you have any questions now or in the future, please feel free to contact me at (562) 941 - 4900, Sincerely, Mark BlackKirn Universal Waste Systems Inc, President 320 From: Mickey Rodich <mickeyrodich@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 6:24 PM To: CC Subject: Parks Master Plan Update For CC Meeting on June 30 th Attachments: img008jpg; imgOlOjpg; img011jpg Attached please find comments that I have made on the Parks Master Plan Update. I have attended some of the Workshops for Ladera Linda and Gateway Park. I also attended the recent CC Meeting for Del Cerro Park. 321 Parks Master Plan Update — Comments for CC Meeting on lune 30, 2015 I think that as a result of events that have transpired in the last week, you the CC, must really be careful of the decisions you make concerning the Parks Master Plan Update. One of our biggest concerns has been the effects of Social Media. We already have had recent problems at Sacred Cove, where Twitter showcased the area as being very desirable. That drew crowds and we also had a death that occurred there. In some of the Public Workshops on Gateway Park, residents were concerned about people parking at Gateway Park and crossing PVDS to get to Sacred Cove. We now have even worse scenarios. a) On Saturday June 27, 2015 an article appeared in the LA Times (Saturday Section) titled "Step Lightly For A Swell Time At Tranquil Cove", featuring Sacred Cove. They show photos, maps, directions and other information like parking at Abalone Cove Shoreline Park for $5.00. They,also list things such as distance, difficulty, duration, summer hours and dogs on a leash, etc. This will bring in another trove of people into our area and cause greater traffic congestion, b) Also on Saturday, the Forrestal Gate was open and more than 50 cars and 99 people from the Santa Monica Hiking.com Club descended on Ladera Linda. One neighbor talked to some of them and was able to get information along with their internet site. A view of their internet site shows that they have 9,264 members. Their site went on to describing the hike in great detail with driving directions, a map of the hike along with the social events afterward at Swan Thai restaurant in Golden Cove and then on to Terranea for drinks after that. The hike was shown to be 4.5 miles with an elevation change of 800 feet. Needless to say "We Have A Problem". Staff has led us to believe that by placing Gateway Park's proposed parking lot as far North as possible, that it will discourage people from hiking to Sacred Cove. We now know that this plan will NOT work because they are willing to hike from Ladera Linda, which is a lot further away from Sacred Cove than Gateway Park. This is a serious problem and must be dealt with. Improving the amenities in our various Parks will only bring more outside visitors, which will in effect prevent our residents from having access to our Parks. LADERA LINDA I attended the Ladera Linda Workshop on Nov. 12, 2014. The following is my understanding of what happened at that meeting and the difficulty I have trying to find pertinent information in the Parks Master Plan Update. 1) The overall report is very confusing. If you were interested in the Parks Master Plan Update results and its recommendations for Ladera Linda Park or Gateway Park, you would have to bounce back and forth throughout the whole 150+ page report and piece together different bits of information. It is very confusing when you must look through a whole report just to find the data from one Park. The data for each venue should be in the same section of the Report and be written so that it is easy to follow. 2) 1 question the creditability of the online surveys. When you attend a workshop you have the advantage of hearing different talking points on the same issues, which gives you a much better perspective and allows you to make a logical decision. However, with an online survey one provides their answer without hearing any other important comments, many of which you may have overlooked. You also have a better idea of how to arrive at an answer, to the questions asked, when you have an opportunity to hear other people's comments, ask questions and discuss the issues thoroughly. 3) Some of the analysis is confusing and the open ended questions make it worse. I don't think that the analysis should include all Parks combined. Each Park has its own unique characteristics and requirements based on its size, location, neighborhood compatibility and immediate resident's desires. It's not a matter of "one size fits all", it's a matter of what is best for the residents who live next to that Park. What does an increase of amenities do for that neighborhood's security, accessibility and expectations? Reading some of the combined 322 analysis shows that Ladera Linda residents are pro Pool by an 80 % majority (page 9 & 10, charts). This is not true. Asking open ended questions distorts the data so that the Staff can justify their survey results any way they wish. 4) When Staff combined Tennis Courts and Paddle Tennis Courts in the same grouping for Ladera Linda, Staff emphasized Tennis Courts. Attending the Ladera Linda Workshops, I clearly heard the people say that they would prefer another Paddle Tennis Court and not a Tennis Court. Ladera Linda, I believe, is the only City Park with Paddle Tennis Courts. Again combining both Paddle Tennis Courts and Tennis Courts is confusing. Even more confusing is when Staff combines Paddle Tennis Courts with Basketball Courts as they did in the chart for Ladera Linda on page 57. Also Appendix "G" is in conflict with other parts of the Plan. Residents are in favor of another Paddle Tennis Court NOT a Tennis Court. 5) Something that this Report completely ignores is the traffic problems we have due to this increased soccer activity. The City conducted a recent PVDS Traffic Study that was flawed. It never included any auto traffic at all. Instead it only included bicycle traffic. So of course there was no study as to the significance of increased auto traffic on PVDS and Forrestal due to the increased soccer activity. It should be the responsibility of the PVUSD and AYSO to have a traffic person at PVDS and Forrestal, on weekends during soccer games or any other high volume event at the Park or the Soccer Fields, to allow people to make left-hand turns safely without waiting for 1S minutes. 6) 1 would like to summarize what I feel are the important issues for Ladera Linda: a) The most important thing that I heard at the Workshops was to preserving our undeveloped land. b) Because the present facilities at Ladera Linda are rated "F", neighbors would approve a low key Community Center. Seeing the problems that have attracted crowds for Sacred Cove, we are in favor of NOT providing additional amenities that would draw such crowds. Safety is critical. Since the nearby Soccer Fields have had increased activity with more cars and crowds than ever before, we have had a marked Increase in burglaries in our homes and cars. The Community Center does not have to be elaborate, but should be designed that an addition can easily be added if necessary at a later date. c) A Sheriff and/or Park Ranger drop-in office. d) An expanded Nature Center. DEL CERRO PARK I also attended the Dec. 3, 2015 Gateway Park Workshop. This Workshop was attended by many residents from the Del Cerro Park area and as a result quite a bit of this Workshop was devoted to the parking issues around Del Cerro Park. The Del Cerro residents were quite upset over the parking problems they experience almost daily and feel betrayed by previous City Councils. This Council is in the process of making positive decisions to improve the conditions they experience. I feel part of the solution for Del Cerro Park must involve the Land Conservancy. They are paid hundreds of thousands of dollars annually, by RPV, to manage the Forrestal Reserve. Del Cerro Park is the main gateway to enter the trails in the Forrestal Reserve. They should be active in Del Cerro Park area and control the access to the trails. The City should control the parking problems surrounding Del Cerro Park. 323 A number of people made this suggestion at a recent CC meeting on Del Cerro Park and I agree that we institute a shuttle bus (PV Transit) and charge a fee to transfer the trail users from a City Hail parking lot to and from Del Cerro Park during the peak traffic times. GATEWAY PARK I attended the Gateway Park Workshop on Dec. 3, 2014. In attendance were people from Ladera, Linda, Portuguese Bend Beach Club, Dei Cerro, Equestrian people, Land Conservancy people, CHOA, City Councilman Jerry Duhovic and others. There were some much heated discussions on a range of issues. The Del Cerro residents said that a previous CC promised them parking relief at Gateway Park. Everyone was sympathetic with their problem, but the fact of the matter is that providing parking at Gateway Park will not solve their problems, because people will not drive 5 miles to get to the very lowest access to the trails and hike all the way up to Del Cerro Park area. The Equestrian people felt that they should have portable corrals, water, portable toilets and a portable structure on the Gateway Park site. The more the discussions got along, there appeared to be a near unanimous decision that it would not be a good idea to develop Gateway Park at all. Some of the negative comments were: 1) The proposed Gateway Park is located in the most dangerous area in the whole landslide area. 2) The area is full of deep fissures and makes walking in that are quite dangerous. Even when they are filled up, it only takes a week or two before new fissures begin to form. Just look at PVDS in that areas: a week after it is re -paved new cracks appear. Some of the land movement directly across PVDS moves up to 25 feet per year 3) Access from PVDS will create traffic hazards and congestion. Many of the people will park there and walk across PVDS to get access to beaches and Sacred Cove. Plus the proposed entrance is on curves. 4) Maintaining this area will be very expensive. In summary, the vast majority of the people are opposed to making any improvements in Gateway Park and i agree with them. It is located in the most active slide area and people will be parking there and cross PVDS, which will create congestion on PVDS and may lead to pedestrian accidents. And then you have the Social Media issues that I have shown above, at the beginning of my report. MICKEY RODICH Resident of Ladera Linda 324 Teresa Takaoka From: Mickey Rodich <mickeyrodich@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:44 PM To: CC Subject: CC Meeting 6/30/15 Parks Master Plan Update Attachments: img012.jpg; img013 jpg; img014jpg; img015.jpg Enclosed are 4 attachments that belong to my 3 page comments submitted yesterday. Please put them together. Thank you. 325 MIND & BODY "Ickery 3DVANDO RAMMU, left, and Hilario Ortega navigate a tidepool on the Abalone Cove Trail. TIB VIXW6 along Olmstead Trail include TABX IN the emerald scenery of Sacred Cove Lloyd Wright -designed Wayfarers Chapel. from the Portuguese Point trail WALX owvbAiy along the slippery tidepools for a look at the soalife, includes crabs. 326 F8 SATURDAY, JUNE 27, 2015 L.A. WALKS Step lightly for a swell time at tranquil cove BY CIIARLEs FLEMING Tucked into the Palos Verdes coastline, this quiet cove offers good walk• ing, great ocean views, a secluded beach and some of Southern Califor- nia's most accessible tidepools, Wear shoes that can get wet to get a close look at the aquatic animals. Park and pay the $5 parking fee atAbalone Cove Shoreline Park, (Parking on nearby residen- tial streets is by permit only.) Leave the parking lot headed toward the water, and follow the Abalone Cove Trail along a cliff -side fence. Con- tinue as the trail cuts through some bushes and turns steeply downhill. When you hit a wide stretch of asphalt, head right to visit the beach or left to continue to the tidepools. Then bear right and downhill onto Sea Dahlia Trail as it winds along the water. You're now on part of the California Coastal Trail, Begun in 1878, it will even- tually extend 1,200 miles from Mexico to the Oregon border. 3 The rocky trait will curve around and spill onto a wide beach. Just beyond are terrific tidepools, where you can see star- fish, sea anemones, crabs and maybe even one of the shiny shells of the abalone that give the park its name. Watch for incoming waves The stats Distances 2.5 miles Difficulty: 3, on a scale of 1 to 5 Duration: I V, to 2 hours Details: Parking is $5. Dogs on a leash are OK on bluffs. No dogs allowed on beach or trails. Summer hours: noon to 4 p.m. Mondays to Fridays, 9 a.m, to 4 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays. and slippery rocks. With the beach behind you, climb past a public restroom to wide Olmstead Trail. (The Olm- stead design firm., which was re- sponsible for New York's Central Park and San Francisco's Golden Gate Park, also designed parts of Palos Verdes Estates.) Follow this trall as it arcs up and to the right, climbing to the bluffs above. At the top of OLmstead Trail, turn right to circumnavigate Portuguese Point. Enjoy broad ocean views to the west of Santa Catarina Island and to the south of adjacent Sacred Cove. On the inland hill above you is Wayfarers Chapel, the "Glass Chapel" de- signed by Lloyd Wright. It's one of the South Coast's premier wedding locations. 40 Finish the Portuguese Point circle, follow Olmstead Trail back downhill and retrace your steps back along the rocky coast -- or make the walk more arduous by taking the bluff trail to the right Just before Olmstead hits the beach. But watch your step on this narrow, steep trail, which rejoins the Sea Dahlia Trail just before it heads back uphill to the parking lot. Fleming is the author of"Secret Stairs: A Walking Guide to the ' Historic Staircases of Los Angeles" and the just -published "Secret Walks: A Walking Guide to the.�.. Hidden Trails of Los Angeles." rharlas ftamin o�n'-i oiimac nom 327 t/U' W.J 6°ti', �)vZ.1?tt�� .J J t-�'"-y�"./,�A-�-�'�-e"�.,✓w4C'>"`..c-.�-C:y �'.,i..t'.:.�..��'Gf,,�'�" .fs_'L� ,� Home Members Sponsors Photos Pages More SMUGGLERS COVE SEA CAVE - TIDEPOOL5 - PAIRS VERDES - Swan Thai - Terranea Resort qq went Yesterday � n:oo AM — at JOHN G. Forrestal Nature Prw.nc CO-ORGANIZER BIKE overlooking the OCEAN... we'll see tidepoots, EVENT HOST the Loch Ness Monster and a couple sea eaves... Kim C Phil 1) the HIKE is 4.5 miles.,, in places it is STEEP with loose dirt, Chuck so bring shoes with TRACTIONI i there's an goo foot elevation change David V. we'll travel a short distance next to the road... the TIDE will be LOW at 12:16 Annie BRING a SNACK for our stop by the Sea Caves... we'll stop there for at least 20-30 minutes Richard R. s) drive to SWAN THAI for lunch (drive down the hill and turn RIGHT on Palos Verdes Drive for Howie +y approx 4.5 miles... turn RIGHT into the shopping center. where Trader Joes, Starbucks and Swan That is) 31206 Palos Verdes Drive Panagiata 3) Drive to Terranea Resort for drinks after lunch SUlnit 's. +i 1 mile south from Swan Thai on the beach side $10 Valet parking per car or FREE parking with 1/4 mile walk in parking lot just north ofTerranea Shannon M meet in main building where there is indoor, outdoor seating and a BAR all with terridie views of the ocean GIo Karsten ""' Note... sometimes the gate to the parking area to the trail - head is locked, in which case there's plenty of street parking just 328 before the gate. IP the gate is open, drive PAST the gate 1/2 mile to the end of the road and park there. If the gate is locked, park on the street and walk to the trailhead, t/at mile pant the gate. MAP to Swan Thai / Asaka / Subway / Starbucks and TERRANEA RESORT Terranea Website GREAT VIEW OF THE OCEAN111 BRING A semi NICE CHANGE OF CLOTHES111 Terranen is a CLASSY yet semi -casual resort. v— i�) 9 Murielleh Bonnieann kat Saida Rex ... canyon c. +, "ME WANT C001GE" Traveler -Lisa Evan B. Kevin H. Heather Carmen A Risse sboy Kevin Q. Fred S. Prakash Jane Farah IN From: Angela Jarasunas <angeleromas@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 9:29 PM To: CC Subject: Response from the Palos Verdes Park Place HOA on the Parks Master Plan Update Attachments: response to city council from PVPP HOA.docx Attached is a letter from the Palos Verdes Park Place HOA on the Parks Master Plan Update, specifically addressing our opposition to the the changes proposed for Del Cerro Park. Please view the text of the letter below. I also included our letter as an attachment. To the Honorable Mayor of Rancho Palos Verdes and the City Council: I am writing on behalf of the Palos Verdes Park Place Homeowners' Association. Our HOA includes the 7 homes on Burrell Lane and the 3 homes on Park Place. 3 of our homes on Park Place are next to Del Cerro Park (the park is across the street from our front yards), and 3 of our homes on Burrell Lane are contiguous to Del Cerro Park (the park is next to our backyards). We have reviewed the Parks Master Plan Update, which is to be presented to the City Council on June 30, 2015. Although we are grateful that the City Council agreed to new parking restrictions to address the congestion and the safetv of those travelini to and from this area, we are strongly against any further improvements to Del Cerro Park, including installing a restroom building and installing additional picnic tables. We would also like further clarification on a contemplated shift to drought tolerant landscaping. First and foremost, any additional concrete structures or permanent fixtures in Del Cerro Park could hamper future rescue efforts of emergency personnel during wildfires and compromise the safety of our homes and the cntirc pcninsula. During the last 2 significant wildfires that affected RPV and this area, Del Cerro Park was used as an emergency staging ground for water -dropping helicopters, fire engines and other emergency vehicles. This park only has 2 acres of flat grassy area, and using some of this limited space for a permanent restroom facility would interfere with future access for emergency personnel. There are frequent 'staging' and 'practice exercises' (lx / week) by LA County Fire Department in one fashion or another now. Other large vehicles that are involved in staging as well as in major events include not only Fire but Police, Health &, Safety AND many Sheriff and Fire helicopters as well. For all these exercises and real events, the Park must accommodate the likelihood that Fire, Police, other Emergency vehicles AND Helicopters be able to literally drive onto - and land - on Del Cerro ... and having picnic 330 tables and bathroom buildings, etc. 'in the way' would be significantly more problematic and potentially catastrophic. We also oppose additional picnic tables in the area because they seem to attract park visitors interested in using portable barbeques. The use of illegal barbeques in Del Cerro Park has been a problem for some time, even though there is a sign posted which strictly prohibits barbeques. Our residents frequently call the Lomita Sherriff's station, or more recently the RPV Park Ranger, to report the use of these barbeques. The police have historically been slow to respond. Our residents have dialed the ranger twice this summer to report barbeques in the park; we are not sure if the ranger responded at all. More picnic tables will likely lead to more illegal barbeques in our park, and this situation is outright dangerous given our ongoing drought and Del Cerro Park's location in an extreme high -fire - danger zone. Our HOA is also surprised that the RPV Recreation 8v Parks Department is proposing improvements to our park that will likely attract more visitors. We had hoped that the recent parking discussions in front of the City Council and the Traffic and Safety Committee had significantly highlighted the congestion and safety concerns for both drivers and pedestrians in this area. Although Del Cerro Park has posted hours of operation, the general public often ignores these rules, and our homeowners frequently call the police or the RPV ranger to report late- night partygoers to the park. if a restroom building were to be constructed, it would have to be locked and unlocked every morning by staff; it would be unacceptable to leave it open 24/7 because there would be no way to prevent access to the restrooms when the park is supposed to be closed. If the PRV Recreation 8s Parks Department feels we need more restrooms (and we agree that 1 portable toilet on the trail can't support up to 1,000 visitors per weekend to the trail), then the city should place more portable toilets along the trail in inconspicuous areas, including at the base of the trail, not just at the Del Cerro end. Any toilets should be out - of -sight of residents' homes. No one wants to have a view of toilets (whether portable or permanent) from their front or back yard! Overall, Del Cerro Park was designed as a small quiet neighborhood park. We want the public to be able to enjoy Del Cerro Park and take in the incredible views from the bluff, but this 4.5 acre park with only 2 acres of flat grassy area wasn't designed to accommodate large crowds given the limited parking in our area and the fact that the park is surrounded by private residences. Additionally, in reviewing the materials presented in the Parks Master Plan Update appendices, we saw very little mention of RPV residents wanting toilets or other improvements in Del Cerro Park. Thank you for your time. The Palos Verdes Park Place Homeowners' Association 331 To the Honorable Mayor of Rancho Palos Verdes and the City Council: I am writing on behalf of the Palos Verdes Park Place Homeowners' Association. Our HOA includes the 7 homes on Burrell Lane and the 3 homes on Park Place. 3 of our homes on Park Place are next to Del Cerro Park (the park is across the street from our front yards), and 3 of our homes on Burrell Lane are contiguous to Del Cerro Park (the park is next to our backyards). We have reviewed the Parks Master Plan Update, which is to be presented to the City Council on June 30, 2015. Although we are grateful that the CitX Council agreed to new parking restrictions to address the congestion and the safety of those traveling to and from this area, we are strongly against any further improvements to Del Cerro Park, including installing a restroom building and installing additional picnic tables. We would also like further clarification on a contemplated shift to drought tolerant landscaping. First and foremost, any additional concrete structures or permanent fixtures in Del Cerro Park could hamper future rescue efforts of emergency personnel during wildfires and compromise the safety of our homes and the entire peninsula. During the last 2 significant wildfires that affected RPV and this area, Del Cerro Park was used as an emergency staging ground for water - dropping helicopters, fire engines and other emergency vehicles. This park only has 2 acres of flat grassy area, and using some of this limited space for a permanent restroom facility would interfere with future access for emergency personnel. There are frequent 'staging' and 'practice exercises' (1x / week) by LA County Fire Department in one fashion or another now. Other large vehicles that are involved in staging as well as in major events include not only Fire but Police, Health & Safety AND many Sheriff and Fire helicopters as well. Far all these exercises and real events, the Park must accommodate the likelihood that Fire, Police, other Emergency vehicles AND Helicopters be able to literally drive onto - and land - on Del Cerro ... and having picnic tables and bathroom buildings, etc. 'in the way' would be significantly more problematic and potentially catastrophic. We also oppose additional picnic tables in the area because they seem to attract park visitors interested in using portable barbeques. The use of illegal 332 barbeques in Del Cerro Park has been a problem for some time, even though there is a sign posted which strictly prohibits barbeques. Our residents frequently call the Lomita Sherriff's station, or more recently the RPV Park Ranger, to report the use of these barbeques. The police have historically been slow to respond. Our residents have dialed the ranger twice this summer to report barbeques in the park; we are not sure if the ranger responded at all. More picnic tables will likely lead to more illegal barbeques in our park, and this situation is outright dangerous given our ongoing drought and Del Cerro Park's location in an extreme high -fire -danger zone. Our HOA is also surprised that the RPV Recreation & Parks Department is proposing improvements to our park that will likely attract more visitors. We had hoped that the recent parking discussions in front of the City Council and the Traffic and Safety Committee had significantly highlighted the congestion and safety concerns for both drivers and pedestrians in this area. Although Del Cerro Park has posted hours of operation, the general public often ignores these rules, and our homeowners frequently call the police or the RPV ranger to report late-night partygoers to the park. If a restroom building were to be constructed, it would have to be locked and unlocked every morning by staff; it would be unacceptable to leave it open 24/7 because there would be no way to prevent access to the restrooms when the park is supposed to be closed. If the PRV Recreation & Parks Department feels we need more restrooms (and we agree that 1 portable toilet on the trail can't support up to 1,000 visitors per weekend to the trail), then the city should place more portable toilets along the trail in inconspicuous areas, including at the base of the trail, not just at the Del Cerro end. Any toilets should be out -of -sight of residents' homes. No one wants to have a view of toilets (whether portable or permanent) from their front or back yard! Overall, Del Cerro Park was designed as a small quiet neighborhood park. We want the public to be able to enjoy Del Cerro Park and take in the incredible views from the bluff, but this 4.5 acre park with only 2 acres of flat grassy area wasn't designed to accommodate large crowds given the limited parking in our area and the fact that the park is surrounded by private residences. Additionally, in reviewing the materials presented in the Parks Master Plan Update appendices, we saw very little mention of RPV residents wanting 333 toilets or other improvements in Del Cerro Park. Thank you for your time. The Palos Verdes Park Place Homeowners' Association 334 To the Honorable Mayor of Rancho Palos Verdes and the City Council: I am writing on behalf of the Palos Verdes Park Place Homeowners' Association. Our HOA includes the 7 homes on Burrell Lane and the 3 homes on Park Place. 3 of our homes on Park Place are next to Del Cerro Park (the park is across the street from our front yards), and 3 of our homes on Burrell Lane are contiguous to Del Cerro Park (the park is next to our backyards). We have reviewed the Parks Master Plan Update, which is to be presented to the City Council on June 30, 2015. Although we are grateful that the City Council agreed to new .parking restrictions to address the congestion and the safety of those traveling to and from this area, we are strongly against any further improvements to Del Cerro Park, including installing a restroom building and installing additional picnic tables. We would also like further clarification on a contemplated shift to drought tolerant landscaping. First and foremost, any additional concrete structures or permanent fixtures in Del Cerro Park could hamper future rescue efforts of emergency personnel during wildfires and compromise the safety of our homes and the entire peninsula. During the last 2 significant wildfires that affected RPV and this area, Del Cerro Park was used as an emergency staging ground for water - dropping helicopters, fire engines and other emergency vehicles. This park only has 2 acres of flat grassy area, and using some of this limited space for a permanent restroom facility would interfere with future access for emergency personnel. There are frequent 'staging' and'practice exercises' (1x / week) by LA County Fire Department in one fashion or another now. Other large vehicles that are involved in staging as well as in major events include not only Fire but Police, Health & Safety AND many Sheriff and Fire helicopters as well. For all these exercises and real events, the Park must accommodate the likelihood that Fire, Police, other Emergency vehicles AND Helicopters be able to literally drive onto - and land - on Del Cerro ... and having picnic tables and bathroom buildings, etc. 'in the way' would be significantly more problematic and potentially catastrophic. We also oppose additional picnic tables in the area because they seem to attract park visitors interested in using portable barbeques. The use of illegal 335 barbeques in Del Cerro Park has been a problem for some time, even though there is a sign posted which strictly prohibits barbeques. Our residents frequently call the Lomita Sherriff's station, or more recently the RPV Park Ranger, to report the use of these barbeques. The police have historically been slow to respond. Our residents have dialed the ranger twice this summer to report barbeques in the park; we are not sure if the ranger responded at all. More picnic tables will likely lead to more illegal barbeques in our park, and this situation is outright dangerous given our ongoing drought and Del Cerro Park's location in an extreme high -fire -danger zone. Our HOA is also surprised that the RPV Recreation & Parks Department is proposing improvements to our park that will likely attract more visitors. We had hoped that the recent parking discussions in front of the City Council and the Traffic and Safety Committee had significantly highlighted the congestion and safety concerns for both drivers and pedestrians in this area. Although Del Cerro Park has posted hours of operation, the general public often ignores these rules, and our homeowners frequently call the police or the RPV ranger to report late-night partygoers to the park. If a restroom building were to be constructed, it would have to be locked and unlocked every morning by staff; it would be unacceptable to leave it open 24/7 because there would be no way to prevent access to the restrooms when the park is supposed to be closed. If the PRV Recreation & Parks Department feels we need more restrooms (and we agree that 1 portable toilet on the trail can't support up to 1,000 visitors per weekend to the trail), then the city should place more portable toilets along the trail in inconspicuous areas, including at the base of the trail, not just at the Del Cerro end. Any toilets should be out -of -sight of residents' homes. No one wants to have a view of toilets (whether portable or permanent) from their front or back yard! Overall, Del Cerro Park was designed as a small quiet neighborhood park. We want the public to be able to enjoy Del Cerro Park and take in the incredible views from the bluff, but this 4.5 acre park with only 2 acres of flat grassy area wasn't designed to accommodate large crowds given the limited parking in our area and the fact that the park is surrounded by private residences. Additionally, in reviewing the materials presented in the Parks Master Plan Update appendices, we saw very little mention of RPV residents wanting 336 toilets or other improvements in Del Cerro Park. Thank you for your time. The Palos Verdes Park Place Homeowners' Association 337 From: marty foster <martycrna@cox.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 10:33 AM To: CC; Douglas.wilmore@rpvca.gov Subject: Gateway Opposition We join our neighbors in strenuously opposing Gateway Park The site poses many safety risks to both pedestrians and drivers Our fragile peninsula arterials need less traffic not more. Staff report was very complex but the comments there are stark declarations of the many objections Low key plans for LL seem to draw favor Look forward to the discussion tonight Thank you for all your time, talent and hard work Respectfully Bill and Marty Foster LL residents Tiiis email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com 338 From: SunshineRPV@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 11:14 AM To: CC; PC; Doug Willmore; Cory Linder; Matt Waters; So Kim Subject: A quick note about agriculture MEMO from SUNSHINE TO: RPV City Council, Staff and interested parties RE: Historic and educational agriculture programs in relation to the Parks Master Plan draft update. June 30, 2015, City Council Agenda Item 2. All it takes is a little housekeeping in the City's Zoning and Land Use Maps and it will be official. There is no more land in RPV which is designated for agricultural use. That is a serious "update". See the table in the Staff Report pages 19 and 20. First off, who is kidding whom? There are no agricultural opportunities at Fred Hess Jr. Park, Gateway Park, Los Verdes Golf Course nor Robert E. Ryan Park. Educational agricultural programs have been proposed at Upper and Lower Pt. Vicente Park. But, they are not included in the Proposed Land Use column. Only Council can direct Staff to pursue these offers of "hands on" program management and equipment. a. 339 From: SunshineRPV@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 2:52 PM To: CC; PC Subject: City Plan updates beyond tonight Please don't get bogged down in the minutia. Your directions to Staff should be focused creating documents which somebody will actually reference in order to preserve and improve the special things we have here in RPV. Don't wait until you have to review the whole, bloated, disgusting draft update of the General Plan. There are thousands of errors, omissions and redundancies. The real point is that Staff doesn't pay any attention to the Plans we have. Why make mo bigga ones. ...S 310-377-8761 M 340 From: ptl7stearman@gmail.com on behalf of Herb Stark <herbertstark@cox.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 2:09 PM To: Matt Waters Cc: CC; CityClerk Subject: Gateway Parking Lot I would like to speak against having a parking lot in Portuguese Bend slide area until the land movement is slowed or stopped. The City is already spending close to $700,000 a year in maintaining the road through the slide. Maintaining an access road and the parking area will only add to the cost. A second issue is safety. The parking area will provide easy access to the beach area and Sacred Cove. We have already had a negative experience with the death a swimmer. When Abalone Cove parking area was closed for repair and upgrading, the parking area on the south end of the slide was opened. This resulted in a large increase in the use of the trails leading to Sacred Cove. Rather than providing access to the preserve, the parking would be used as a trail head to Sacred Cove. Because of the danger, the City would be forced to provide lifeguard, security and rescue service adding an unintended cost to the general fiend. Base upon the above I hope you would reject a parking lot in the slide area until staff adequately addresses the two issues. Herb Stark 32306 Phantom Dr. RPV 341 From: homecoding@gmail.com on behalf of Madeleine Mc Jones <madeleine@homecoding.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:08 PM To: Matt Waters; CC; CityManager; Parks Subject: Gateway Park To the City Council and Respected Managers, This weekend I walked over the landslide to the beach and there due to that awesome access were 5 people with buckets plucking away and taking things from Smugglers tide -pools, the tide -pools once full of octopus are now wiped clean. I did not see one ranger protecting the wildlife. Yea for Access! and most where definitely not residents. There were plenty of dogs on the beach to! These folks where not spending money in your city, but the brought in product because now there is much fine trash on a beach that used to be clean. Hey, Nature can take it! Of all the things that need to be done in our city how can adding more pavement over open -space that is actively moving should not even be on the city agenda. What is the unspoken target? Realty check is that this park project it has been in the works for so long City cannot drop it without loosing face? Be honest! Will it really increase your revenue that much? Do we not already have a park with in a mile? This park is not for your city resident! Now that you have ruined the remote beaches with "ACCESS" my family seldom goes to them. I would gladly take the nudist back. I have basically given up, I feel in my heart you have the dump trucks primed from the last tame the landslide archery party project will not drop this no matter how loud we cry about it. How can we fight your dogged agenda of pavement and cement to natural surroundings? All logic fails us. Even if your work is resulting in some revenue why is adding maintenance and cost to our city and opening our budget to injury law actions make any sense? We know this logic seems to fall on deaf ears, the powers are so set on this park so they can have a statue named after themselves? Shame on any name who puts up a monument to this park. We already have a park just like this one only 400 feet away, Parks look awful compared to open space ask Malibu! We have needs in this city, but you reject these in this super macho need to pave the landslide and make it accessible. What is driving this long term agenda? Do we need another dolphin bronze statue with someones name? Who needs this access? Not the residence to be clear, so only drive out of city human traffic needs this access. Why are they your target audience not your tax payers who really want a pool at Ladera Linda. Again you are opening this area up to accidents, crime, and maintenance and all of this does not target your tax paying city dweller, it targets the visitors who are not going to be shopping here but having accidents. It is not well policed now and it will take away more of the special view it will make us the same as every other city, as pavement and curbs and toilets are found at Torrance beach. It will make some money but it will be lost in maintenance and accidents due to missed maintenance. This abuse of the land impacts the voiceless, who speaks for the animals there have no voice in you meetings. Not the eagle whose scream will be lost or the bunny or the snake. You pick away at the open space for humans, not even the tax paying ones and you ignore the animals and the beauty of natural dirt and brush for the all powerful not green automobile parking. The more people that have access, the more disturbed will RON W be the preserve and the birds whose scrub nest will be jogged by every ten minutes like Western Avenue. They will not longer breed. Who complains for them? I feel beaten but ...one last plea for the ravens that breed in the cliffs and need peace and no people. Please turn your back on these old plans, just because they are long in the making that can also make them long in the tooth, they are with out regard to nature and citizens. What you thing is improvement it chipping away at the very thing and animals makes RPV special. Please look at the needs of your citizens and preserve animals. Please the City can still turn away, turn green and spend this money for the people of this city, please bring outsiders and cars to the places of business not the last places of nature. Madeleine McJones #3 Tangerine Road RPV 343 From: Oliver Hazard <perryhappy@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 4:28 PM To: cc Subject: No gateway parking lot. Dear city council men and woman, We do not need a parking lot in an active landslide! I hope you are all on the same page. No ocean safety to guard the caves, where we have had drownings. Are community does not even have it's own police, we rely on Lomita which takes a long time to respond. The park rangers can not handle what they already have, so we should not give them more to deal with. It will cost a lot more than you think to build and to maintain. Pluse add to the traffic when they have to fix pvds every month or so. It is a dangerous landslide that we should not be encouraging people to go to. We need to solve Del Cerro parking problem before anything else! Hope these few points can help you make the right decision, Thank you for your time, Oliver 344 Matt Waters From: mittelstaedt@verizon.net Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 2:50 PM To: Matt Waters Subject: Re: RE: FW: Parks Master Plan Update Staff Report Importance: High Thank you, Matt My concern is regarding Hesse Park, which I (and many others) use regularly. The trash containers placed throughout are an eyesore, and unsafe, falling apart, as follows: * Many of the original stone/concrete containers are falling apart - cracked, broken, some have dark stains (mold?). * These stone containers are missing their original lids (with central holes), and someone has placed thin plastic trash cans inside them, which are too tall, and stick up out of the stone cans (again, no lids) Trash is in the open, flies around, etc. • There are some other types of cans in a few places - bright blue plastic, etc, etc. I see mostly the area around the sports field and the picnic area, and the main building, when I exercise, etc. So, that is the location of these cans, but I am surmising there is probably a similar issue in other areas of the park, due to the age of the facility, etc. My suggestion is that new trash/recycle containers be supplied for Hesse Park as part of the planned renewal. Thank you! Sue Mittelstaedt On 06/29/15, Matt Waters<MattW@rpvca.gov> wrote: Dear Ms. Mittelstaedt, Absolutely you still have time. Any comments you submit in advance of tomorrow's City Council meeting can be attached as late correspondence for Council's consideration. Please submit to me by email as soon as possible and I will forward them to the City Clerk's office. Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst 345 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.palosverdes.com/rpv mattw _rpvca.gov - (310) 544-5218 p — (310) 544-5291 f WE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL AND IF I AM IN YOUR CONTACTS, SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM mattw@rpv.com TO mattes@rpvca.eov From: mittelstaedt@verizon.net [mailto:mittelstaedt@verizon.net] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 6:01 PM To: Matt Waters Subject: Re: FW: Parks Master Plan Update Staff Report Matt I attended meetings during the park planning process, but didn't mention an item regarding Hesse Park. Can I still bring up a concern regarding something that needs attention? Thanks Sue Mittelstaedt On 06/26/15, Matt Waters<MattW rpvca.gov> wrote: 346 The City of Rancho Palos Verdes' Parks Master Plan Update is on the June 30t1i City Council Meeting. Click the link below to access the June 30t1i CC agenda and then go to Item #2. June 30th City Council Agenda Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.palosverdes.com/rpv mattw(5)-rpvca.gov - (310) 544-5218 p — (310) 544-5291 f WE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL AND IF I AM IN YOUR CONTACTS, SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM mattw(&,,rpv.com TO mattw(a),rpvca.gov 347 as Matt Waters From: Matt Waters Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 10:45 AM To: John Schoenfeld Cc: Cory Linder Subject: RE: Pool Proposal for RPV Master Plan Dear John, Nice meeting you as well and thanks for sending in your pool proposal. Your email and attached submission will be attached as late correspondence to the June 30`h City Council Agenda. Sincerely, Matt Waters Senior Administrative Analyst City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 www.palosverdes.com/rpv mattwarpvca.gov - (310) 544-5218 p — (310) 544-5291 f WE ARE IN PROCESS OF SWITCHING TO A NEW WEB AND EMAIL DOMAIN. PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL AND IF I AM IN YOUR CONTACTS, SWITCH MY EMAIL FROM mattw@rpv.com TO mattw@rpvca.gov From: John Schoenfeld [mailto:john@jalexanderco.com] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 1:58 PM To: Matt Waters; Cory Linder Subject: Pool Proposal for RPV Master Plan Cory, Matt, Attached is the letter discussed at Tuesday's meeting. Please advise if anything further is required. Good meeting you and look forward to making something wonderful happen! Best regards, John 349 JA111P, 1. ALEXANDER COMIANY, IN(,.*. A t,4:� '55 foffcz. e C,t, 90505 IEE C)PU'W'; CCDNS,� VVIUCTICIN IMANAC;H-AS IDLIA(ziN-EM-IlLt-) F'. -,,x 3X, tai -8 350 JACD BUILDERS DEdi 0FV t t tr-F_:Rs CONS t f- UC. t ION MANAGERS O .SIGN43UIt_C3 June 24, 2015 Messrs. Cory A. Linder and Matt Waters CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Gentlemen: 24255 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 102 Torrance, CA 90505 (310) 375-9731, Fax (310) 791-8270 www.jalexanderco.com license number 596199 We much appreciated your having taken time to meet with us yesterday to discuss our vision for a swim training facility and hope we can be included in the master plan being developed for the City Hall property. Attached conceptual site plan contemplates an active multipurpose facility complete with public areas, a gym, a weight room, offices, locker rooms, bleachers and more all built around an Olympic -size pool. The facility itself is expected to require approximately 1.8 acres plus parking which is assumed to be shared with other components of the master plan. The scope could increase or decrease depending on how the City's overall master plan evolves. A resident of Rancho Palos Verdes for more than 32 years, our team's principal, Bill Kao, foresees a partnership with the City wherein the City provides a land concession and Bill's group finances, builds and operates the complex for a prescribed number of years after which the complex reverts to the City. We feel certain our project will be an asset to both the City Hall development and to our community, and we look forward to being an integral part of your new master plan. Again, we thank you for your kind consideration. Yours truly, John A. Schoenfeld President attachments 351 0 ly I". t � CE 0 352 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: DEPUTY CITY CLERK DATE: JUNE 29, 2015 SUBJECT: ADDITIONS/REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA Attached are revisions/additions and/or amendments to the agenda material received through Monday afternoon for the Tuesday, June 30, 2015 City Council meeting: Item No. Description of Material 2 Emails from: Gary Randall: Jarel and Betty Wheaton; Chris Del Moro Respectfully submitted, 41 -1 - Teresa Takaoka MAGENDA\2015 Additions Revisions to agendas\20150630 additions revisions to agenda thru Tuesday.doc 353 From: Gary Randall <grapecon@cox.net> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 9:06 AM To: CC Cc: CityClerk; Matt Waters; CityManager; Parks Subject: NO to Gateway Park Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers: I am writing this note to you to express my strong opposition to any development (including a parking lot) at Gateway Park. There are many reasons why this is not a good idea ... all of which have been voiced by numerous residents and are included in Appendix D of the staff report and do not need to be repeated here. Even more important than those reasons, however, is that the majority of the most affected residents who live in the area do not wish to have it developed at all. The following chart is from page 12 of the staff report: + 1 '. -1'*f. T00ls i4aW1 o,tatr receivea a suosmnuar numoer-or emaus regaraeng uateway rarK ana uei Uerra-rare. x.. spreadsheet of the emails is in the Public Outreach Appendix D, Below is a chart showing combined Gateway Workshop attendee responses. Gateway Park Public Woikshop berciso results Ptz�nk,/Stgt�ag�X4arrec Etfiaiw9ia�rc�aiKit�RSc� ■ Great ja 3M i 11 J trWenr Attv"i It is clear from this chart that the only feature residents are in generally in favor of is making sure there is adequate emergency response access thru this area. I honestly was quite surprised to read, on page 26 of the staff report, the indication that "As Gateway Park was by far the most controversial topic addressed during the public outreach process, staff is seeking particular direction from the City Council on how it should be addressed in the Park Master Plan Update." Given the chart above, and the overwhelmingly negative response from local residents to any development at Gateway, this does not seem to be 1 354 controversial at all. On the contrary, it is very clear what the staff should be recommending: no development at Gateway Park! Since staff has asked for your direction, I encourage you to provide direction to staff to simply remove development of Gateway Park from the Master Plan (including removal of any re -zoning requests). This will allow staff to focus their time, energy, resources (and taxpayer dollars) on parks projects the residents do want. Respectfully, Gary Randall Ladera Linda Resident RPV Resident for over 40 years 355 From: Gary Randall <grapecon@cox.net> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 9:20 AM To: CC Cc: CityClerk; Matt Waters; CityManager; Parks Subject: Support for Staff Recommendations for Ladera Linda Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers: I am writing this note to you to express my general support for the recommendations staff has made for the Ladera Linda site in the recently published staff report, I attended both workshops, and I believe the general consensus from the local residents was that replacing the existing buildings with a modest community center would be good for this area. The other "additional site improvements," which would be done in conjunction with a new center, also generally make sense, although once again, emphasis should remain on them being "modest." I would like to thank the parks staff, particularly Matt Waters and Cory Linder, for all the work they have put into gathering public input and putting together his report, and for facilitating and moderating all the emotionally charged workshops this past winter. Respectfully, Gary Randall Ladera Linda Resident RPV Resident for over 40 years 356 From: Jarel Wheaton <jwheat2007@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 9:54 PM To: CC Subject: Comments for June 30 City Council Meeting: Master Park Plan Update In reviewing the staff report for the Master Park Plan Update we strongly recommend against consideration of Upper Point Vicente as a location for a skate park for the following reasons: 1. A skate park would be a single use facility that primarily serves a single age group. Any recreational use for this prime location should be multiple use and serve residents of all age groups. 2. Skate paries and other over development of park facilities are likely to become a big attraction in the region and increase the type of parking and safety problems currently experienced at Del Cerro Park. We recommend that any discussions of placing a skate park anywhere in RPV be put on hold until the city has successfully implemented a solution to handle the large number of people being attracted to the trails in Rancho Palos Verdes. Jarel and Betty Wheaton Rancho Palos Verdes M01 357 From: Chris Del Moro <collectic@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 1:30 PM To: Chris Del Moro Cc: CC; CityClerk; Matt Waters; CityManager; Parks Subject: NO to Gateway Park Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers: Unfortunatly I am out of town on work for the next meetings so I am once again writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Gateway Park project. Even after the community's input and the overwhelming plea to not go forth with the project why are we still pushing for this dangerous project to come to fruition? I've been to and heard everyones input, all of which are very valid points and I can assure you that the first people held responsible when bad things happen will be the city of Rancho Palos Verdes. Even if you only give a 3 day notice and bury the facts deep in the city report, we are following/listening and you will be held accountable. As I see it, impact on the preserve is only getting worst, on my last journey through the preserve I came across many feces piles accompanied by toilet paper, trash in all areas of the park shows me that the usage and lack of care for the area is increasing by the month. I have also noticed that people are bushwalking and creating many new veins of trails that are effecting erosion and the sensitive natural habitat. Imagine all the new foot traffic and then add the last few weeks of traffic, earth moving, road maintenance and pedestrians crossing the road to get to the beaches, the place will be ripe with accidents of all shapes and sizes. We already have a mis-managed piece of coast line, if we cannot manage this piece of land now, how will we do so when you open it to the masses? My main concerns are still as follows SAFETY - Deaths via land slide fissures Un - guarded beaches - drownings etc... July 4th weekend and even last month. Traffic crossing - blind corner, j walking etc... Illegal activity Le - camping, drugs, drug runner pick up and so forth. Management We already have an issue with rangers presence or lack of, trash pickup and so forth. Creating a chair lift for Bikers to continue carving up the hill and adding fuel to the Biker, Horse, hiker trail wars. Abalone Cove project has been a great easement to add accessibility to visitors to this sensitive area. Its a great alternative to this plan, lets focus on properly managing that area and the best thing is it's up and running and has been for many years. Please listen to the people, protect our land and keep it pristine. This will not help the Del Cerro area, intact it will only make things worst by essentially creating a chair lift for mountain bikers. The last thing we need is more turmoil between bikers, horses and hikers. INI 358 Thank you for your time and please do the right thing The Del Moro family 30 years plus Rancho Palos Verdes residents 359