Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
RPVCCA_CC_SR_2015_06_30_02_Parks_Master_Plan
CFFY OF MEMORANDUM I -A RANCHO PALOS VERDES TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CORY LINDER, DIRECTOR, RECREATION AND PARKS DATE: JUNE 30, 2015 SUBJECT: PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDATE REVIEWED: DOUG WILLMORE, CITY MANAGE VW Staff Coordinator: Matt Waters, Senior Administrative Analyst, Recreation and Park %�, RECOMMENDATION 1) Review the draft Parks Master Plan Update; 2) Accept public input on the draft Plan; 3) Provide staff with direction; and, 4) Continue the matter to a future date for formal adoption. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the 2015 Parks Master Plan Update (PMPU) is to update the 1989 Parks Master Plan and to set forth a comprehensive strategy for addressing the future planning of the City's parks, recreation, and open space resources. The PMPU will function as a living document to help guide and respond to changes in the City's future park, open space and recreational needs. The PMPU presents updated information on each of the City's Park sites and identifies specific and general recommendations, but at its core it is a strategic document, not a series of construction blueprints. Significant park projects will still need to go through separate design and planning processes, public outreach efforts and City Council review and approval. BACKGROUND The City's existing Parks Master Plan was adopted on October 17, 1989 and has not been updated since that time. The 1989 Plan included a citizen survey, public workshops, meetings with special interest groups, written correspondence, and contact with homeowners associations and individual residents. The resulting Plan contains an extensive list of policies, goals and recommendations regarding the park and recreational needs of the community, as well as factual 1 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 2 information and recommended improvements for each park site in the City. (Appendix A: 1989 Parks Master Plan Update) There have been many parks and open space changes and additions since the adoption of the 1989 Master Plan Update. The City has acquired several new park sites and significant open space areas, including the now 1,450 acre Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. There have been attempts since 1989 to update the Parks Master Plan. The most comprehensive attempt occurred in 2002 when the City Council expanded the seven -member Recreation and Parks Committee into an eighteen -member Open Space Planning, and Recreation & Parks Task Force (Task Force). The Task Force, whose membership included a broad spectrum of interests concerning the recreation, parks and open space issues affecting the community, was charged with investigating all of the City's existing resources and unmet needs, and advising the City Council on updating the 1989 Parks Master Plan, including making recommendations for utilization of City parks and open space properties. The Task Force, which organized itself into eight subcommittees, presented a strategic plan to the City Council in 2004. The plan, which included dozens of recommendations for park sites and an extensive set of recreation options for the Upper Point Vicente/Civic Center property in particular, was not adopted by City Council and the Task Force was officially dissolved in 2005. (Appendix B Open Space Planning and Recreation & Parks Task Force Report). More recently, the Coast Vision Plan was adopted by the City Council on September 2, 2008. The Coast Vision Plan represented over two years of planning and an extensive public outreach effort to create an informational planning document for the City's coastal areas. The Coast Vision Plan includes the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve and five additional sites: Upper Point Vicente, Lower Point Vicente, Abalone Cove, Gateway, and Del Cerro. The Plan also addressed improvements and recommendations related to public access, interpretive materials, and recreational amenities and facilities to improve the experience of the coast and open space areas for residents and visitors. While many of the Coast Vision Plan recommendations have not been significantly affected by developments since its adoption, several sites have been impacted by subsequent actions including the Annenberg Foundation's withdrawal of its proposed development project in 2011 and the Council's conceptual approval of including a skate park at Upper Point Vicente in 2014. (Appendix C: Coast Vision Plan w/ Amendments) The Coast Vision Plan was updated in 2012 to remove the Annenberg Proposal at Lower Point Vicente. A public outreach process is currently underway to develop an updated plan for Lower Point Vicente that would be incorporated into the Council -adopted Coast Vision Plan. Once the 2015 Parks Master Plan Update (PMPU) is adopted, the impacted elements of the Coastal Vision Plan will also need to be updated. Then -Councilwoman Susan Brooks submitted a City Council Study Session report on May 20, 2014 recommending that staff provide an update to the 1989 Parks Master Plan. Her report stated that "This Plan would be presented to Council and the public for input and feedback regarding the future of our parks and their corresponding programs. This undertaking might require a large amount of staff time and resources, as various communities would be contacted for input and potential Town Hall meetings will likely occur." 05 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 3 Subsequently at the July 29, 2014 City Council Meeting, the Council discussed a proposal for a skate plaza to potentially be located on the grounds of Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. The staff report noted that "while there is nothing in the 1989 Master Plan that specifically recommends or discourages a skate park, it is worth noting that the City Council recently directed Recreation staff to conduct a Master Plan update. This update will include Point Vicente Park. Council may wish to consider including SPV's (Skatepark Palos Verdes) proposal as part of the master plan process." City Council provided updated direction to staff to complete an update of the City's 1989 Park Master Plan that would provide a comprehensive strategy for addressing the future use of the City's parks, recreation and open space resources. The update would consolidate plans that currently exist for a number of major park sites, while being consistent with the City's General Plan and other guiding documents. Skatepark PV's proposal for a skate plaza at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center would also be considered as part of the update effort. DISCUSSION Public Outreach Process A robust public outreach process was undertaken which included the following components: • Mass mailing to all City residences in October 2014 • Updates on the City's Website • Creation of a Parks Master Plan Update City Webpage • Multiple Listsery messages • Multiple Notifications on Facebook and Nextdoor • Online Recreation Activity Guides • Public Banners • Press Releases • Notifications to Homeowner Associations • Mailings to residences adjacent to parks discussed at public workshops • Contacting stakeholders and interested parties The two major components of the public outreach process were a series of twelve public workshops held from November 2014 through February 2015 and an informal online survey, conducted using the online survey website, Survey Monkey. The facilitated public workshops focused on particular park sites and were designed to obtain detailed feedback on current and possible uses at each location. Two workshops each were held for five park sites: Eastview Park, Ladera Linda Park, Point Vicente Park/Civic Center, Upper Hesse Park, and Gateway Park. The public workshop process concluded with two general workshops which covered the five focus parks sites, as well as all other park sites and open space areas. While public workshops tend to attract people who live near to a particular site or have an interest 3 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 4 in a particular recreation topic, a survey generates more general, community -wide responses to a series of recreation topics. The online survey was approved by the City Council and was subsequently completed by 743 respondents from November 21, 2015 to its closing on March 15, 2015. Questions ranged from general attitudes about parks and open space topics to very specific questions about support for components at Ladera Linda Park and Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. This was not a professional survey or statistically valid, but its results did provide many useful insights. The following is an overview of the findings and conclusions of the 2014-15 Parks Master Plan Update public outreach process. A more thorough analysis of the public outreach effort can be found in the attached Parks Master Plan Update. Appendix D has the complete public outreach documents including online survey results, all emails received, public workshop "tape dot" exercises, meeting summaries and comment card results. Online Survey Analysis 743 total responses were received from November 2014 through March 2015. 87% of respondents indicated that they lived in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Responses were received from all sections of the City. 75% of respondents rated the City's Recreation and Parks Department as either "great" or "good" on its ability to provide physical parks and facilities to the public. Sixty-two percent rated the Department as "great" or "good" on its ability to provide recreation programs, activities and events. Overall, how would you rate the City of Overall, how would you rate the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department in its ability to provide physical Department in its ability to provide physical parks and facilities to the public? Check parks and facilities to the public? Check the appropriate circle. the appropriate circle. Answered: 736 Skippea:7 Arrewerztl: 736 3kipp l:7 Great Great coda caea Aaequs[e M Aaequa4e Fair , Fair Not meellrq, Not meeting, expectations enpectationa 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% M% l0% 60% W% IW% 0% 10% 2D% 3D% 40% 50% 60% 7U% W% 90% 1W% Respondents were asked to indicate their general address by filling in their cross streets. Below is a graphic represenation of RPV resident respondent locations. Larger circles indicate a higher number of respondents from particular cross streets. The lowest level of responses came from the eastern section of the City while the most responses came from the southern area near Ladera Linda and the northwest section of the City. al Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 5 CROSS STRE T5 - TORRANCE LOMITA f— PALO VERDES ESTATES oL u ROLLING HILLS ESTATES V o� ROLLIhJO HILLS ii O No. of People ;, LAS AN = E: 32 t — --J i i 16-17 13-15 11-12 9-10 N 7-8 5-6 C 3-4 1-2 Miles 0 0.35 0.7 1.4 In order to get a sense of how survey respondents spend their leisure time, a number of recreation activities and options were presented. Respondents were asked to check all activities that they participated in on a monthly basis. Not surprisingly, given the City's emphasis on open space and trails, 87% of respondents selected "hiking, walking and jogging" which was by far the most popular choice. Other notable results include "Swimming" (29%), "Going to the beach" (56%), "Skateboarding" (22%), "Using a dog park " (29%), "Working Out at a Gym" (36%), "road biking" (19%), "picnicking or relaxing at a local park" (40%), "Tennis" (15%), "Participating in senior programs" (14%), and `Mountain biking" (11 %). 5 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 6 I_avrc3ee Surnng F rseta riding ■ G:Igg Cr±1>1a teach Ska en-oarding UBIng.9rk VFbrkbV Gut at a Byrn F&-rbclpabng In senlcar_.. Gcfnng Rcad biking it Picnicking or raxing at ... Tennis Pw Parbopabng In an RPV_.. Adeno I r a _ RPV aRBI c=... Nlrwntaln Mirrg Playlrig baseball P13ying :?ac--,er PIs�'Ing ElOriaall playing res ll Playing 41% 141% 20% 3056 40°1 SCS E+0% w 80% . 1aC°4 m Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 7 The survey revealed moderate support for developing additional recreation elements such as playing fields and basketball or tennis courts (44% support/33% don't support) and greater support for building physical facilities such as a community center, gym, pool, or children's playground (52% support/30% don't support). Development of additional playing fields and outdoor recreation elements such as basketball or tennis courts i4na'Avfad: 717 Wpped:2G oon4 ayipat — H— xo oppmun 1-0% 20% 30% 40% 51% FA`.< _ e 61% ;Ch 11_': Building of physical recreation facilities such as a community center, gymnasium, pool or children's playground 6neNY:rM 7V-ipd&7: i. Support Ca:n'[ support — Hagew"pCo n _ . 1.'i 29% 3G% 40% 51 W% 7v% a3% 9M 10G% Public support for preserving undeveloped land for wildlife and natural habitat remains strong at 82% with only 7% not supporting the idea. This high level of support for open space dovetails with the 87% of respondents who say they hike or walk on a monthly basis, as well as respondents who ride horses (8%) or go mountain biking (11 %). A significant portion of the survey focused on two sites: Point Vicente Park/Civic Center (City Hall) and Ladera Linda Community Center. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center was selected because a large percentage of its flat, developable area is currently undeveloped and it has been the focus of previous planning processes including the Coast Vision Plan and Open Space Task Force efforts. Ladera Linda Community Center was selected because it has been identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan as being a candidate for renovation or demolition/rebuilding because of the poor condition of its buildings and infrastructure. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center: Online Survey Results Survey respondents were asked to indicate whether they supported, didn't support or had no opinion about various possible components at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. The components that received the highest level of support were a band shell or amphitheater, skate park, village green, permanent dog park, and a children's playground. A chart of survey response is shown below. 7 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 8 Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Survey Responses Below is a summary of survey open-ended questions regarding Point Vicente ParkCivic Center. The topics that received the most positive responses were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Online Survey: Point Vicente Survey Open Ended SUMMARY SupparR Don't Sup part No Opinion Building a nILIltiple-spoit gymna5Wrn 33.24% 42.42% 74.U% Building an outdoor swimming pool 37.41% 43.53% 19.0s% Adding more outdoor tennis or paddle tennis courts 29.07% 41.31% 29.62% Building a bared shell or amphitheater SS.os% 23.64% 21 Building a skate park 42.569M6 41,86% 15. Adding: playing fields for soccer, baseball and other field sports 37.97% 35,53% 26.15% Creating a village green with gardens and walkways 62.03% 16.97% 11% Providing a permanent dog park 51.60% 30.74% 17.&6%— 7.Building Bu i I di ngwalking paths with f itness stations 67.45% 17.25% 15 Building outdoor basketball courts 34.7796 35.47% 29.76- Building bocce ball courts 27.82% 35.61% 36.59% Building a children's playground 51.74% 23.64% 24.61% Building a tricycle park for tots 28.7996 40.79% 34 Building an arts/cultural center 34.77% 39.39% 26. Below is a summary of survey open-ended questions regarding Point Vicente ParkCivic Center. The topics that received the most positive responses were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Online Survey: Point Vicente Survey Open Ended SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 24 2. No skateboard park 4 3. Pro -Pool 9 4. Pro -Dog park 7 5. Sports Related 25 6. Open Spaces/Trails Hiking/Nature/Gardens 29 7. Equestrian 2 8. Community Center/Youth Activities/Facility Rentals 15 9. Seniors 4 10. Youth 4 11. General Facility/Maintenance 11 12. Miscellaneous 11 Ladera Linda Park: Online Survey Results Ladera Linda Combined Survey Responses Survey respondents were asked to indicate whether they supported, didn't support or had no opinion about various possible components at Ladera Linda Park. The components that received Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 9 the highest level of support were walking paths, an expanded nature center, athletic fields and a new community center. A chart of survey response is shown below. Below is a summary of open-ended survey questions regarding Ladera Linda Park. Clearly showing some direct correlation with responses to the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center responses, the most popular answers were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents advocated for new and enhanced community center, and improved park amenities, security and increased maintenance. Online Survey: Ladera Linda Survey Open Ended SUMMARY Supp art Don't Support No Opinion New community Center atWJg_U Linda 37.96% 27.31% 34.7336 Walking paths with fitness stations 65.4196 13.45% 21.15% Gymnasium 29.2746 38.24% 32.49% Additional Paddle tennis Courts (currently hvo) 17.65% 40,06% 42.3036 Tennis Courts [currently none] 35.01% 30.81% 34.17% Bocce Ball Court(s) 27.7396 29.69% 42.5536 Expanded Nature Center 51.5496 20,17% 28.29% Athletic Fields 47.2046 22.41% 30.39'96 Indoor Pool 32.9146 41.60% 25.4936 Outdoor Pool 33.75% 40.34% 25.91% Tricycle Park. for Tots 31.51% 30,81% 37.6896 Below is a summary of open-ended survey questions regarding Ladera Linda Park. Clearly showing some direct correlation with responses to the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center responses, the most popular answers were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents advocated for new and enhanced community center, and improved park amenities, security and increased maintenance. Online Survey: Ladera Linda Survey Open Ended SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 38 2. No skateboard park 2 3. Pro -Pool 16 4. No pool 4 5. Pro -Dog park 14 6. Sports Related 27 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 22 8. Equestrian 7 9. Community Center 5 10. Youth 11 11. Security Concerns 6 12. General Facility/Maintenance 15 13. Miscellaneous 6 Online Survey Open -Ended Questions The survey concluded with two open-ended questions. The first was "In your opinion what is the single most important thing the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department can do to improve the quality of life for its residents?" 474 people responded. The open-ended nature of the question generated a wide range of responses. Sixty people mentioned skate parks, the great majority in favor. Approximately fifteen responses were pro dog -park. The most 0 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 10 common response category with over 140 entries was open space/nature/trails responses with the majority expressing variants of maintaining and preserving open space and trails. There were also many requests for additional recreational amenities and programs for youth and seniors. Online Survey: Single Most Important Issue SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 60 2. No skateboard park 1 3. Pro -Pool 42 4. No pool 2 5. Pro -Dog park 16 6.Sports Related 32 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 149 8. Equestrian 5 9. Community Center/Facility Rentals 35 9. Seniors 15 10. Youth 14 11. General Facility/Maintenance 25 12. Parking Issues 26 13. Security Concerns 20 14. Miscellaneous 55 The last question of the survey allowed respondents to offer anything else they wished to share. Responses were similar to the previous question, but with a marked increase in responses opposed to Gateway Park and requesting that something be done to mitigate parking impacts in the Del Cerro neighborhood. Online Survey: Any Additional Response SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 28 2. No skateboard park 6 3. Pro -Pool 18 4. No pool 1 5. Pro -Dog Park 18 6. Sports Related 11 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 27 8. Equestrian 4 9. Community Center/Facility Rentals 21 10. Youth 4 11. Seniors 2 12. General Facility/Maintenance 21 13. Parking Issues 22 14. Security Concerns 6 15. Miscellaneous 32 10 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 11 Public Workshop Analysis Workshops were held about five parks sites (Eastview, Ladera Linda, Gateway, Upper Hesse Park, Point Vicente Park/Civic Center) two meetings were held per site, in addition to two general workshops. The results from these workshops are summarized below. Eastview Park Two public workshops were held regarding Eastview Park at Peck Park in San Pedro on November 5, 2014 and January 14, 2015. The most -discussed topic by far was a proposed fenced dog park. Attendees at the first workshop were fairly receptive to the idea and favored a plan that located it near the commercial shopping center on the western part of the park, away from the homes on the eastside of the park. Attendees at the second workshop were strongly opposed to the dog park. Elements that received support were shade structures, improved picnic area, and wide walking paths. Fitness stations received mixed reviews, while a dog park, allowing moon bounces and BBQs received the lowest level support. Many attendees reported incidents of dogs off leash. Concerns were raised about maintenance, feral cats, graffiti, and occasional vandalism. A consistent desire was expressed to maintain the park's low-key neighborhood feel. Below is a chart showing Eastview Workshop attendee responses. Eastview Park Public Workshop Exercise Results Shy Sttudures Fitness Statloru Picnk Areas Ch U P.er k e8as Vu" der Wakir. - Pa r F.;,. ■ Great Ilea It's OK ■ So So r No Gateway Park The two Gateway Park workshops which were held at Ladera Linda Park on December 3, 2014 and February 4, 2015 were the most well -attended and liveliest of all the public workshops. Approximately 80 people attended each workshop. A majority of speakers and attendees spoke out against the Gateway Park project. A number of attendees from the Del Cerro neighborhood spoke in favor of the project and expressed frustration at the traffic and congestion issues they were experiencing near the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve trailhead. While many Gateway 11 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 12 opponents were sympathetic to the Del Cerro issue, they raised a number of concerns about Gateway Park: Safety, particularly considering a drowning death and numerous rescues in July 2014 ➢ Access and traffic safety ➢ Neighborhood impact ➢ Social media and rising attendance at the Preserve and beaches ➢ Doubts regarding effectiveness in relieving Del Cerro congestion ➢ Questions about the availability of other parking lots ➢ Enforcement concerns ➢ Concerns that people would not utilize Gateway Park to access the Preserve, but would cross Palos Verdes Drive South to access nearby beaches Staff received a substantial number of emails regarding Gateway Park and Del Cerro Park. A spreadsheet of the emails is in the Public Outreach Appendix D. Below is a chart showing combined Gateway Workshop attendee responses. Gateways Park Public Workshop .Exercise Results 40 is 30 25 LE M Picnic/ Sitting Areas Edurational Kiosks Staff/ Ranger Portable Emergency Response Parking Lot Tr@11er AcLe5s ■ Creat Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No Upper Hesse Park Two Upper Hesse Park workshops were held on December 10, 2014 and February 11, 2014. Both workshops featured an update on the Lower Hesse Park planning process, but the focus was on Upper Hesse Park. Attendees were most positive about adding shade structures, fitness stations, improved viewpoints, drought -resistant landscaping, and tricycle park for tots, 12 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 13 and replacing storage containers with a permanent solution. Attendees were mixed or negative about expanding the John C McTaggart Hall patio, and bocce ball courts. Concerns were raised about financing, management, traffic, views and adding recreation activities for youth teens and adults. There was a strong general consensus that no significant changes were needed. Below are charts showing combined Upper Hesse Park Workshop responses. Hesse Park Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results W Rol 15 1c a Shade Structure Fitness Stations Improved Expand McTaggart Drought Resistant Viewpoints Hall Patio Landscaping ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No Hesse Park Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 • - Tricycle Park For Bocce Ball Courts Enhanced Picnic Replace Storage Tots Tables & Benches Containers w/perm ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No 13 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 14 Attendees could also offer additional open-ended written comments. Below is a summary, comment details are in Appendix D. Hesse Park Comment Card SUMMARY # of comments 1. Add amenities and/or activities 28 2. Keep as Is 18 3. Maintenance Requested 7 4. Misc. 1 Ladera Linda Park Two Ladera Linda Park public workshops were held on November 12, 2014 and January 21, 2015. Approximately 20-25 people attended each workshop. Attendees had a strong positive response to a new community center with Sheriff/Park Ranger drop-in office and an expanded nature center. They expressed varying levels of support for maintaining the current multi -use lower field, improved amenities, paddle/tennis courts and adding fitness stations. Improvements to the existing paddle tennis courts were requested. There was strong opposition to a pool, gymnasium, dog park and BBQs at this park. Moderate opposition was also expressed regarding an ambulance station; although additional information is needed if this concept is to be explored further. Attendees expressed a desire to maintain a low-key neighborhood feel. Most attendees said their favorite activity was hiking or walking. Below are charts showing combined Ladera Linda Park Workshop responses. Ladera Linda Community Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exerclse Results 26 20 is 1 ■ ■■ ■ ■� ■ ■ ■ e E Greatidea It's OK ■ So So ■ No IL z CZ 14 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 15 Ladera Linda Community Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 40 35 30 2s 15 76 a Park Amenities New Community Dog Park Center NO Nature Center Gym ■ Great Edea It's OK ■ So So ■ No I L Tricycle Course Local Ladera Linda Residents conducted their own survey on opinions about the size of a potential new community center, desired components, recreation facilities and other community issues. The results can be found in Appendix G. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Two Point Vicente Park/Civic Center public workshops were held on November 19, 2014 and January 28, 2015. Approximately 15-20 people attended each workshop. Many possible futures uses were discussed, along with the history of the site and the Open Space Task Force and Coast Vision plans. The components that received the strongest response were the skate park/skate plaza, improved park amenities, a pool, walking paths, and a village green. Ideas that received the least support were bocce ball courts, tennis/paddle tennis courts, a gym, arts cultural center and tricycle course. There was mixed support for playing fields. Concerns were raised about lighting and security, financing of projects, potential crowding of the site, long term maintenance and liability. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Community Center Public workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 25 20 15 NEI 10 0 Dog Park ChHdren's Skate Shade /BBOs Arts/Cultural Park/Skate / Picnic Center Plaza Tables ■ Great Idea E L 111 N NEI NEI Dog Park ChHdren's Gym Tricycle Playground Course for Tots It's OK ■ So So ■ No 15 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 16 Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 14 iT io 8 5 4 .1� Walking Paths with Bocce Ba l l Courts Fitness Sations 11 11111 Village Green wJ Tennis{Paddle Tennis Pool Multi -p ur pose playing Amphitheatre Courts fields ■ Great Idea Ft's OK ■ So So ■ No General Workshops Two General PMPU workshops were held on February 18, 2015 at Ladera Linda Park and February 25, 2015 at Hesse Park. Staff presented an overview of the PMPU process and a review of all the prior workshops. Staff also presented information about all of the City's additional park sites and updates on current park design/planning efforts such as Lower Hesse Park and Lower Point Vicente. Input was very wide ranging at both workshops. Comments and concerns were expressed regarding a senior center, safety, security, Gateway Park, Del Cerro, the landslide area, passive vs. active uses, emergency supplies, an equestrian center, a new community center at Ladera Linda, and additional activities for youth and teenagers. There was a general sense that when it came to development, less was more. Below is a chart showing combined General Parks PMPU Workshop responses. 16 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 17 General Master Plan Public Workshop Tape Drat Exercise Results W as 15 10 s a ■ ■ �■ Outdoor Basketball Preserve: Adjacent New Ccmnnunity Preserxving Building Athletic Additional Paddle Preserve -,access Courts Nature Center Center-Ladera Undeveloped Land Recreation Tennis/Basketball Parking at Gateway Linda Facilities Courts park ■ Gnat Idea Great Idea Outdoor Basketball CGurts Preserve: Adjacent Nature Center New Community Center: Ladera Linda Preserving Undeveloped Land Building Athletic Recreation Facilities Additional Paddle Te:nnis/Basketball Courts Preserve access Parking .at Gateway park Recreational Goals/Objectives It's OIC ■ So So ■ No It's OK So So No 12 3 2 0 13 4 1 In addition to the public input process, there are several other significant factors to consider in developing the PMPU's recommendations including City recreation standards, City Council goals, General Plan Land designations, Open Space and Recreational Resource policies, and existing partnerships are all significant determining factors in the PMPU's recommendations. Open Space and Recreational Resources Policies Although the General Plan Update is currently being reviewed by the Planning Commission, the following is excerpted from the City's 1975 General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element: • Provide appropriate access to public land. • Promote and/or sponsor recreation programs within the City • Encourage local, public, non-profit recreational and cultural activities. • Seek County, State, Federal and private funds to acquire, improve and maintain recreational lands. • Work through the State and Federal government in support of legislation resulting in City acquisition of land. 17 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 18 Encourage institutions to provide public use of their recreation facilities Encourage the building of playing fields, where appropriate, for multiple uses by various recreational groups. The draft PMPU remains aligned with these policies. City Council Goals The City Council sets annual goals. Below are Parks and Recreation -related 2014 goals. Note: the 2015 City Council goals were still being determined at the time of this report. 2014 City Council Goals: • City Trails Enhancement: Complete Trails Network Plan Update (still pending) • Implementation of on-line access to recreation programs and space rentals: Complete "go -live" for Active.net (completed) • Continue with shared use of PVPUSD and City Facilities: City recreation programs to be available at Peninsula High pool and Miraleste Intermediate gym (completed -shared use at both locations scheduled for Summer 2015) • Continue with evaluation of City recreation programs/sustainability of/demand for programs (completed although staff continues to analyze the comparison of privatized rentals, independent contractors and in- house services. Staff continues to research surrounding jurisdictions to stay current on comparative services and fees) Joint Use Agreements The Recreation and Parks Department has developed a number of partnerships, ongoing relationships, and joint -use agreements with agencies that have expanded and enhanced the recreational opportunities available to City residents and visitors. The PMPU does not alter the City's long-standing policy of pursuing mutually beneficial partnerships. Below is a partial list: • Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority: Park Ranger Services and Junior Ranger Program • Los Serenos de Point Vicente: Docent and Junior Docent Programs • Youth Sports Leagues including AYSO, Little Leagues, US Youth Volleyball League, Pony League, Lacrosse, etc. • Palos Verdes Unified School District: Use of Miraleste Gym and Peninsula High School Pool • Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy: Shared management of Palos Verdes Nature Preserve im• Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 19 City Recreational Standards The City's General Plan and the City's Municipal Code (Section 16.20.100c) require four acres of parkland per thousand residents. The General Plan states that the City will "establish ordinances to require builders and developers to provide lands and/or funds for acquisition and development of land for recreational use" and that these lands and/or funds shall "be based on a standard of providing 4 acres of local parkland per 1000 population (City of Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan, page 99)." With a population of 41,643 (2010 U.S. Census), this park acreage standard yields a goal of approximately 165 acres for the City. The City's current park acreage of 278 acres (not including 1,450 acres of open space) far exceeds this goal. The recommendations contained within this Plan will not significantly increase or decrease this number. General Plan Desianations The State of California requires a Land Use Element to be included in every local government general plan. According to the State's General Plan Guidelines, the Land Use Element shall designate the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land for housing, business, industry, open space, including agriculture, natural resources, recreation, enjoyment of scenic beauty, education, public buildings and grounds, solid and liquid waste disposal facilities, and other categories of public and private uses of land. The City's General Plan is currently being updated. Below is a chart of existing land use designation and proposed land use designations. Any changes to the General Plan that have a significant bearing or impact on the PMPU will be incorporated. The only land use change that is specifically being considered in the PMPU is discussed in the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center section. Below are existing land -use designations and proposed land -use designations. Definitions of land use designations are below. Park Land Use ProposedExisting Use Abalone Cove Shoreline R -P R-P/OSP Clovercl iff R2-4 R -P Deane Dana Friendship R -P no change Del Cerro R -P no change Don C Wallace Radio Ranch R2-4 no change Eastview R R -P Founders R151 R -P Frank A Vanderlip R51 R -P Fred Hesse Jr R -A no change Gateway Park A/H/R51 R -P Grandview R -P no change Ladera Linda (City -owned) I -E I -P Ladera Linda (School Dist -owned) I -E no change Los Verdes Golf Course R -A no change 19 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 20 Marilyn Ryan R<_1 R -P Martingale 131-2 R -P Pelican Cove R -P R-P/OSP PVIC R-P/OSP no change Upper Pt Vicente/Civic Center R-P/I-P R-P/I-P/OSP Lower Pt Vicente R -P R-P/OSP Shoreline Park R -P OSP Robert E Ryan R -A no change Vista Catalina R151 R -P A Agricultural H Natural Environment/Hazard I -P Institutional public Open Space Preserve (this is a new land use designation being proposed, currently OSP does not exist) R51 Residential equal to or less than 1 du/ac R1-2 Residential 1 to 2 du/ac R2-4 Residential 2 to 4 du/ac R -A Recreational active R -P Recreational passive R Recreational (no active or passive distinction) Recommendations and Priorities The Parks Master Plan Update has a long list of recommendations on a site by site basis that are phased in over 1-2 years, 3-5 years, and time periods to be determined. Some of the recommendations are already budgeted for or included in the funded or unfunded Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Some smaller projects, such as improvements to general park amenities at all park sites or a shift to drought tolerant landscaping where feasible can be accommodated with existing funds within the Public Works budget. If approved, staff will pursue alternative funding, including grants for unfunded projects. These dollar figures are estimates and may change as projects are further developed and scoped. Given today's challenging economic times, the City will need to deploy its financial resources carefully and thoughtfully to address the identified needs in a cost-effective way. Priorities The following list of priorities is based on staff's interpretation of the data gathered through the process to date: 1. Complete design process/phasing for Lower Hesse Park 2. Approve Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project, outdoor exhibits and expanded/enhanced indoor improvements. 20 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 21 3. Address Preserve parking and neighborhood impact issues at Del Cerro and Gateway Park. 4. Confirm the desired components for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center and initiate Master Plan Process. 5. Approve facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for development of new Ladera Linda Park Community Center 6. Transition to drought -resistant landscaping where feasible. 7. Continue to fund and implement the Citywide ADA Transition Plan. Recommendations Below are the Parks Master Plan Update Recommendations: Details of each park site can be found in the attached PMPU. A spreadsheet of recommendations which includes funding and phasing is attached to this report. Some projects are included in the current FY 14-15 Budget, such as Eastview Dog Park, while others are in the 5 -Year CIP (funded and unfunded), while some projects have no identified funding source at this time. These projects reflect the estimated costs of design and construction. Ongoing maintenance and operational costs will need to be developed for approved projects. Abalone Cove Abalone Cove had two significant upgrades completed in 2014, the Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Improvement Project and the Abalone Cove Parking Lot Improvement Project. Improvements included new trails, picnic areas, viewing nodes with telescopes, interpretive panels, a shade structure, native plant landscaping, and discovery zones. The public restroom, staff building and parking lot were significantly improved and an automated pay system was installed for the parking lot. Recommendations: • Regrade and re -pave the access road from PVDS to beachfront to improve accessibility for emergency response and maintenance vehicles. • Improve site amenities, site -appropriated signage, benches, and picnic tables. Clovercliff Park Clovercliff Park, located on Golden Meadow Drive, is an approximately 7,000 square foot pocket park that has a walking path, is landscaped, and has large rocks that are available for seating with a distant ocean view. Recommendations: • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. • Improve walking path, site -appropriate signage, and benches. 21 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 22 Del Cerro Park There was significant discussion of Del Cerro Park and parking impact on neighbors due to its proximity to the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve. This issue of Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve access is discussed in greater detail in the Gateway section of this report. Note: In April 2015 the City Council directed staff to study parking and access options in the Del Cerro Park area. There have been numerous reports of people parking in neighborhoods adjacent to the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve area. This item was addressed by the City Council on June 16, 2015 and direction was given to staff to allow permit parking in the adjacent neighborhoods, modify on -street parking on Crenshaw Boulevard and establish a resident permit parking program at Del Cerro Park. Recommendations: • Implement the Del Cerro Park Capacity Update Project to address parking concerns/neighborhood congestion and improve Preserve access. • Install restroom building. • Install additional picnic tables and benches. • Shift to drought tolerant landscaping. Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park The property was originally intended as a radio museum with funds for the improvement of the museum to be raised by the Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Foundation. When the required funds were not raised the property became a neighborhood park maintained by the Wallace Ranch Homeowners Association. There are no improvements to the property other than turf and an irrigation system. Recommendation: • Approach HOA to consider a shift to drought tolerant planting to replace or reduce the size of the existing grass field. Eastview Park The number one issues discussed at Eastview's public workshops were dogs off leash and a potential dog park. Off -leash dogs are a common occurrence at Eastview, which has a reputation as being essentially an off -leash facility, even though there is a leash law is in effect at all City parks. Staff has received numerous complaints about residents who feel uneasy or have had unpleasant encounters with off -leash dogs. A dog park would not eliminate this issue, but it would be part of the solution, providing an opportunity for dog owners to legally have their dogs off -leash. Public workshops elicited concerns about the project and significant opposition, although the online survey had strong support. The Eastview Dog Park would have both small and large dog runs. The proposed location currently has ample, existing shade trees and would have seating areas, access to water, public restrooms, and sufficient parking. The location is buffered from commercial buildings to the west, is compatible with the land use designation and has approval from the Sanitation District. The dog park will be unstaffed and have fixed hours of operation consistent with the parks current hours. Staff will utilize existing, approved rule signage from the Rancho Caninos Dog Park. W Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 23 Staff Office: There are currently no staffed parks on the eastside of the City. One of the recommendations for Eastview Park is to install a small, portable staff office that would be occupied by Recreation part-time staff. Recommendations: • Build dog park. • Install fitness stations along walking paths. • Install staff office (portable). • Install shade structures. • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans. • Improve/widen walking paths. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. Founders Park The site is adjacent to the Trump National Golf Course Improvements and includes picnic tables, a gazebo, nearby restrooms, coastal access, walking and biking trails and landscaping. This park, which is dedicated to the courageous visionaries who helped found the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, has tremendous views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina Island. A portion of the site can be reserved for weddings and other ceremonial events. The park is fully maintained by Trump National Golf Course. Recommendations: • Continue ongoing relationship with Trump National staff to maintain the attractive appearance and accessibility of park. • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible. Frank A. Vanderlip Sr. Park This approximately 5 acre park located at 6500 Seacove Drive. Unobstructed views of the ocean, headlands and islands are the main attraction at this park. 23 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 24 Recommendations: • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park Hesse Park was acquired from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District. The purchase was completed in two transactions over a five-year period beginning in 1976. Upper Hesse Park: Development of the facility was completed in September 1983 at a cost of $3,715,405. This park, with its well -manicured parkland and active community center, is one of the most popular in the City. Among the features available for public enjoyment in the upper park area are baseball and soccer fields, numerous picnic tables with barbecues, playground equipment suitable for toddlers to adolescents, and a well -used '/4 mile walking path. Most of the City's privatized recreation classes are offered at this facility and many Peninsula Senior activities are held here. Additionally three rooms in the 7,300 square foot community center are available for rental for meetings and private parties. Lower Hesse Park: A system of trails, two picnic areas, sand volleyball court, and a parking lot were completed in July 1999. Further improvements to this area have been in a planning/ design phase since 2005. Conceptual designs were prepared in 2011 which included extensive landscape and trail improvements and active elements such as a basketball court, tennis court, paved parking lot, and a small structure which would include a public restroom, staff office and storage. The City Council directed staff in 2012 to work with the Pacific View HOA to scale back the project and phase in improvements. A draft plan is being prepared for the site with phases including an initial phase funded at $500,000. Note: This item is scheduled to be presented to the City Council in August 2015. Recommendations: • Install fitness stations along walking path. • Install shade structures. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. • Upgrade existing picnic tables, benches, and trash/recycling cans. • Construct tricycle path for tots. • Resurface parking lot. • Fiber optic cabling allowing for unified communication with City Hall. • Install solar power system on community building. • Replace fencing on northern border of property. • Stabilize the existing view point at the edge of western lawn in Upper Hesse and add benches. • Replace current railroad tie stairs with concrete stairs. • Incorporate results of Lower Hesse Park Improvement Project once completed. 24 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 25 Gateway Park Background Information When the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve was first created in 2004, an approximately 25 -acre portion was set aside at the southern tip of the Portuguese Bend Reserve to be used as an Active Recreation Area (ARA). Subsequently, in 2008, the City Council adopted Coast Vision Plan, which identified the area, now known as Gateway Park, to be the future home of an equestrian center with riding rings and public parking that would also serve as a trailhead to the Preserve. None of the proposed improvements would consist of permanent structures because of the active land movement in the area. The equestrian center improvements were envisioned to be sponsored by the local equestrian community. To date, no formal request to construct the improvements from the equestrian community has been received by the City. On April 1, 2014, the City Council reconfigured and reduced the size of Gateway Park from 25 - acres to 18 -acres. At this same meeting, the Council also removed the 40 -acre Archery Range property located on the opposite side of Palos Verdes Drive South from the Preserve. The Management Agreement with the Palos Verdes Land Conservancy was amended to reflect these changes. Subsequently, staff prepared a conceptual plan for Gateway Park to serve as the main parking area and southern "gateway" to the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The concept was developed in part to relieve some of the parking and congestion problems that have developed on Crenshaw Boulevard and the area around Del Cerro Park. The concept plan was presented to the community through the PMPU process and consists of the following elements: • Dirt access road and parking lot with approximately 30 parking spaces, including several spaces large enough for horse trailers • Picnic tables and seating areas • Hitching posts • Staff/Ranger drop-in trailer (portable) • Public restrooms (portable) • Interpretive and educational information on portable kiosks • Emergency vehicle access Gateway Park would be a staffed park site, and staff would further educate the public on the rules of the Preserve. Because Gateway Park sits within an active landslide, all improvements would be temporary and mobile. 25 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 26 ,.a._ Gateway Park n3 4. _ '. ... Proposed Gateway Layout Public Input: Numerous strong concerns were expressed during the PMPU public outreach process regarding this proposal including safety, security, and the area's fragile geology. Residents expressed concerns that visitors would park at Gateway Park and then cross Palos Verdes Drive South to access the beaches and coves. Many residents referenced a tragedy that occurred on July 4m 2014 where an individual drowned and numerous rescues were necessary due to high surf conditions. Social media and increased public awareness of sites such as Abalone Cove and the Nature Preserve were also identified as concerns. As Gateway Park was by far the most controversial topic addressed during the public outreach process, staff is seeking particular direction from the City Council on how it should be addressed in the Park Master Plan Update. To that end, staff offers the following points to consider: • The City's geologist has examined the proposed location and determined that it is appropriate for the proposed uses, none of which are permanent and can be moved as needed. • Safety is a paramount concern, so the site will be staffed when open to direct visitors towards the Preserve. • Signage would be installed to inform visitors of potentially dangerous surf conditions and that the lot is intended for Preserve visitors, not beachgoers. • The parking lot is located as far away from PV Drive South as possible to discourage beach access. • An Abalone Cove Safety Task Force has been formed to address dangerous surf conditions and has established safety protocols. • Staff acknowledges that people may ignore all the safeguards listed above and put themselves in danger. Oceans are dangerous and will continue to be so despite all best 26 14 "F •A d pie, y fit.. N ,.a._ Gateway Park n3 4. _ '. ... Proposed Gateway Layout Public Input: Numerous strong concerns were expressed during the PMPU public outreach process regarding this proposal including safety, security, and the area's fragile geology. Residents expressed concerns that visitors would park at Gateway Park and then cross Palos Verdes Drive South to access the beaches and coves. Many residents referenced a tragedy that occurred on July 4m 2014 where an individual drowned and numerous rescues were necessary due to high surf conditions. Social media and increased public awareness of sites such as Abalone Cove and the Nature Preserve were also identified as concerns. As Gateway Park was by far the most controversial topic addressed during the public outreach process, staff is seeking particular direction from the City Council on how it should be addressed in the Park Master Plan Update. To that end, staff offers the following points to consider: • The City's geologist has examined the proposed location and determined that it is appropriate for the proposed uses, none of which are permanent and can be moved as needed. • Safety is a paramount concern, so the site will be staffed when open to direct visitors towards the Preserve. • Signage would be installed to inform visitors of potentially dangerous surf conditions and that the lot is intended for Preserve visitors, not beachgoers. • The parking lot is located as far away from PV Drive South as possible to discourage beach access. • An Abalone Cove Safety Task Force has been formed to address dangerous surf conditions and has established safety protocols. • Staff acknowledges that people may ignore all the safeguards listed above and put themselves in danger. Oceans are dangerous and will continue to be so despite all best 26 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 27 efforts. There are already a number of parking lots that allow for beach access in Rancho Palos Verdes. The City currently has no designated parking spots for the Portuguese Bend Nature Preserve. Gateway Park was removed from the Preserve at the time of its acquisition in order to help address this issue. The Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve and the entire Palos Verdes Nature Preserve are a source of tremendous pride for the City. The majority of City residents cannot access this area by foot. Allowing for a modest parking lot at the southern end of the Portuguese Bend Nature Preserve will allow visitors, both resident and non-resident alike, to access this community jewel. Grandview Park Grandview Park offers a large opportunity for development and meeting community recreational needs since it is 18 acres of completely undeveloped parkland. However, because of the site's challenging topography and that it is undeveloped, substantial grading and installation of utilities will be required and will add to the cost of developing the site. In 2010, City Council approved a conceptual plan for Grandview Park, including improved access, amenities, and recreational elements. At the time of this Parks Master Plan Update, the conceptual plans were undergoing the Mitigated Negative Declaration environmental analysis. Recommendations: Dependent on the results on the environmental analysis process, proceed with the "Sycamore Option" beginning with Phase 1 which would include construction of a natural parking lot, restrooms/office, play area, picnic area, and landscaping. Initiate a facilitated design/pubic outreach/phasing process for the remaining elements of Grandview Park, including activity lawn, viewing nodes, discovery area, flexible cycling area and walking trails. Ladera Linda Park In 2013, SA Associates, an engineering firm, was hired to assess the current condition of existing public structures in the City. In the resulting Infrastructure Report Card, the Ladera Linda Community Center received an overall infrastructure score of "F" (Fail). This rating is given to those building that are in very poor condition. The Infrastructure Report Card utilizes grading criterion that the general public can relate to, similar to the grading used in education. It is the same criterion used by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in grading the condition of public infrastructure. Based on those findings, the main recommendation is to build a new community center. Recommendations: Development of New Community Center: • Develop a facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for a new Ladera Linda Park Community Center. • Incorporate expanded Nature Center/Preserve Annex and Sheriff/Ranger drop-in office into Master Plan Process. 27 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 28 • Upon completion of Master Plan Process, proceed with demolition of existing buildings and construction of new Community Center. Additional Site Improvements: • Install fitness stations. • Install shade structures on lower level and paddle tennis level. • Pave access road between lower and middle parking lots. • Install two bocce ball courts adjacent to paddle tennis courts. • Improve landscaping on existing multi -use playing field. • Upgrade surfacing of current asphalt play area. • Retain the two existing basketball courts. • Add one tennis court. • Add tot tricycle course. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible. • Install interior paddle tennis fencing separating the two courts. Most recommendations above should be done in conjunction with Community Center development. Lower Point Vicente Park/Point Vicente Interpretive Center The Lower Point Vicente Park Improvement Project is still in progress at this time. The results of that process, which focuses on site improvements including new decomposed granite trails, reconfigured and new parking spaces, drainage facilities, landscaping , fencing, signage, and grading, as well as exterior exhibits at PVIC (Phase 3) will be incorporated into the Master Plan once finalized and approved by the City Council. The outdoor exhibit elements being considered include the following: 1. Parking Lot and Bioswale 2. Grassland/Play Area 3. Tongva Village interactive exhibit 4. Geology/Fossil Dig interactive exhibit 5. Dry Farming interactive exhibit 6. WW II History interactive exhibit 7. Overlook area 8. Wall of Honor A planning/design effort was also underway at the time of the Master Plan's submission for indoor exhibits (Completion of Phase II) which will upgrade, enhance, and unify the museum's current exhibits. Staff and members of Los Serenos de Point Vicente Docents are currently working with an exhibit designer and seeking grant funding for the projects. The results of that process are recommended to be incorporated into the Master Plan once the initial design is finalized and approved by the City Council. • Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 29 •'S � i f i7 150 it Nan,. at.n 1© } I l rr _ yk z ti f KEY: s+�e 1 g _ _ - f." 1. Pond Viccnie �icrpr�eF},�e - it r(�.( r �•;.. •'�' �C Aer 2 %rlong Lt oath B-— - ' 3. G=krLd A. Tongues Vii ge f 1 tr + L. A—hnenlagucal INg k. r T. Spnrnh Rancho r @. dry Forming r 4. WWII W6 t -y and Reximom la. 0w e_k4 ' 7 ^ -- I L 'Pial of tiaracs Picnic '`••�!�• a +- 1 J' V 12 A-- tro he placed ii;.nugt,nul; 10 FAras T—f Netw lk: 12 �' I _ ♦r•r•ira Ilk—rdand A&I—A-iahi-o' Buffer r - Y, Mnpr ne ; It Re ende ,sy In- 15D benxer taaA and property ene_15:kfl a + rr . 4- >, P A IN Recommendations: • Implement Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project (once approved) to include: new decomposed granite trails, overlooks, reconfigured and new parking spaces (including new upper terrace parking lot), drainage facilities (including a bioswale), landscaping, fencing, way -finding signs and minor site grading to accommodate the improvements, Phase 3 exhibits living history exhibit process, authorize staff to look for funding sources. Incorporate Phase II Interior Exhibit Update into Master Plan once process is complete and approved by Council. Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible Install Solar Power System on the Point Vicente Interpretive Center building Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park Marilyn Ryan Park, located on Ocean Trails Drive, has tremendous views of Trump National Golf Course and the Pacific Ocean. The park features picnic tables, benches, a water 29 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 30 fountain, a dolphin statue and a bridge named in honor of LAPD Swat Officer Randall Simmons who was killed in the line of duty. The park is named for the original Mayor of Rancho Palos Verdes. The property is maintained by Trump National Golf Course. Recommendations: Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible. Continue to maintain positive working relationship with Trump National to maintain attractive appearance and appropriate uses of the park. Martingale Trailhead Park This parcel was designated for construction as a trailhead park and to establish easements for a fifteen foot wide equestrian trail that traverses this parcel as well as Lots 20 and 21 of the same tract. Park improvements were completed and the park was dedicated in 1990. The site is located in an Equestrian Overlay District. The trailhead provides access to a trails system serving the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills and Rolling Hills Estates. Both hikers and equestrians utilize this park. Improvements include landscaping, a tri -level drinking fountain which serves horses, humans and small animals, a mounting block, and a seating rock. Recommendation: • Upgrade existing amenities including water fountain and signage. Pelican Cove Formerly known as Point Vicente Fishing Access, Pelican Cove features a paved parking lot, restroom building, improved trail to the shoreline, and incredible Catalina Island and ocean views. Native plantings surround the parking lot which links to the public parking lot at Terranea and the adjacent coastal trail system. The parking lot, restroom building, and the landscaping is maintained by the Terranea Resort pursuant to the Council -adopted Terranea Maintenance Agreement. Recommendation: • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Backaround Information The size of the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center property, combined with its spectacular ocean views, few nearby neighbors and location adjacent to City Hall, has made it a focal point for potential development plans and site improvements throughout the City's history. The property, which boasts spectacular coastal and ocean views, is a tremendous resource that could potentially accommodate a number of civic, recreation, and cultural needs for the community. The property consists of three components: 30 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 31 Point Vicente Park The 65.12 acres of park land that was acquired from the Federal Government after its use as a NIKE Missile Base was closed and the property was declared surplus by the General Services Administration (GSA). The majority of the park is part of the Alta Vicente Nature Reserve, which is part of the larger 1,450 -acre Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, and has been set aside for habitat preservation under the Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP). In addition to the habitat areas and existing public trail network, other land uses include a 5.5 - acre farm, an unpaved public parking lot and an emergency helipad. By permit, model helicopters are allowed to be flown in a designated area surrounding a helipad. Civic Center The 8.23 acres of designated Civic Center was purchased from GSA in two parcels. There are no use restrictions on the land acquired by the City in -fee for Civic Center use. The Civic Center includes the City Hall offices, maintenance yard, an open grassy areas, a sand volleyball court, one tennis court and the "Rancho Caninos" temporary dog park. This is the site of the City's annual July 4t" Independence Day Celebration. Palos Verdes on the Net, Peninsula Volunteer Alert Network (PVAN) and Peninsula Seniors also have facilities on the property. Coast Guard The U.S. Coast Guard also owns a 3.93 acre parcel located on the west promontory overlooking the Point Vicente Lighthouse, which is the site of several communications towers and a historic WWII -era artillery bunker. Active Recreational Opportunities Point Vicente Park is conditioned by deed to allow continuous public access for recreational use in perpetuity. The land may not be sold or transferred to any entity other than another governmental agency, and then only with the consent of the Department of the Interior. The park land has an approved Program of Utilization (POU) that describes future development. Any change to that Program must be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Parks and Recreation. The park land may not be leased and any concessior agreement for operation of recreational facilities must be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Recreation and Parks. While the majority of the park is restricted for passive recreation, the POU identifies a 6.6 - acre area in the northern portion of the property to be used for active recreational purposes. However, this area of the site is now part of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, where active recreation would not be permitted. According to the Conservation & Open Space Elements section of the City's General Plan, "Any changes in land use to the property through future Master Planning efforts would require approval by the Planning Commission and City Council through public hearings along with review and approval of a change, if necessary, to the Program of Utilization by the National Park Service." Staff approached the National Park Service in 2014 about the possibility of moving the 6.6 -acre active recreation area from its current location adjacent to the Villa Capri Condominiums to the upper portion of the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities. In September 2014, the National Park Service representative concurred that this proposal would be consistent with the site's POU (see 31 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 32 attached email). A potential reconfiguration of the 6.6 -acre area to the upper portion of the site is depicted in yellow in the aerial photograph below: Proposed ±6.6 -Acre Active Recreation Area LADA NIKE Site 55, Point Vicente, Rancho Palos Verdes (GSA No. 9 -D -Calif -1088) Potential Skate Park/Plaza On April 15th, 2014, the Council tasked the Director of Recreation and Parks to work with the Skatepark PV Inc. (SPV) Board of Directors to review, evaluate and modify as necessary, the skate park proposal by SPV and report back to the City Council with a recommendation specifically addressing the feasibility of allowing a privately funded skate park to be constructed at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. Staff analyzed the feasibility of the project by looking at a number of factors including a) needs assessment; b) consistency with the 1989 Parks Master Plan; c) consistency with the 2008 Coast Vision Plan; d) Program of Utilization/Zoning; e) financial/liability analysis; and f) visual/aesthetic concerns. Upon completion of the analysis, staff believes that, if it is the desire of the Council and the community to have such a facility at Point Vicente Park, it would be feasible to construct a skate park on the property that conforms with the site's current zoning/land use deed restrictions, and that issues concerning financing, insurance and visual/aesthetic concerns could be addressed through the proper agreements, operating procedures, and project design/site placement. Council directed staff to update the Parks Master Plan prior to making a decision regarding the SPV skate park proposal. It is still Staff's position that a skate park is a feasible component that would serve a wide range of people, but particularly the traditionally underserved teenager and young adult population. A skate park received a 4 out of 5 on Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Workshop comment cards, strong support from the Tape Dot Exercise, and slightly 32 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 33 more respondents choosing to support the skate park, over don't support it on the online survey. (Note: the term "skate park" was used on the online survey, rather than SPV's preferred "skate plaza" nomenclature. This was done for the sake of clarity because "skate park" is a more common name for such a facility.) RVP MULTI -USE PLAZA 0 Pillar MULTI -USE AREA PLAN DeAgn Stvaior RANCHO PALOS VERGES, Cr- Overview L Overview of proposed 15,000 square foot skate plaza location The 15,000 square foot design may be larger than needed. Several Councilmembers expressed concern about its size and prominent location. Appendix E details a number of local skate parks, most of which range from 8,000 to 10,000 square feet. The very popular Peck Park Skate Park in San Pedro, for example, is 8,000 feet. A smaller footprint would also allow for more flexibility in where the skate park is located on site and how it is configured, leaving additional room for other components, additional parking, or a larger village green. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center has ample space, is located on a major street, and can be accessed by public transportation. Skateboarders would not be able to access the location by skateboard due an existing skateboarding ban on Hawthorne Boulevard. SPV has indicated that they would be able and willing to finance the design and construction of the project. Recommendations: Authorize a facilitated Master Plan Design and Public Outreach Process for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center using the Coast Vision Plan Long Term Plan as a base document with the inclusion of a skate park in the "new uses" area. Confirm the following recommended components to be included in site's Master Plan Process: ✓ City Hall ✓ Community Center 33 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 34 ✓ Skate Park/Plaza (not to exceed 10,000 feet) ✓ Outdoor Swimming Pool ✓ Shade Structures ✓ Children's Playground ✓ Walking paths w/fitness stations ✓ Enhanced amenities: picnic tables, benches, trash/recycling cans/BBQs ✓ Improved Village Green ✓ Tennis courts ✓ Permanent dog park Direct staff to continue the process to move the 6.6 acre parcel from its current location along the northerly boundary of the lower portion of Point Vicente to the upper portion of the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities. • Incorporate results of Public Works Corporation Storage Yard Relocation process to study the possibility of spreading out the storage yard to strategic locations throughout the City with a smaller central office at City Hall, thereby increasing the efficiency of Public Works operations and allow for the potential development of all or part of the existing maintenance yard. RPV Beach: RPV Beach was acquired as part of the Trump National Golf Course Development Agreement. The public beach is accessible by steep trail via Trump National Golf Course and Founders Park. Recommendation: • Make no changes to this site. Robert E. Ryan Park Ryan Park was originally constructed and owned by the County of Los Angeles. Ryan Park is named for City Founder and former Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor Robert E. Ryan. The park's former name was Rancho Palos Verdes Park. Upon the incorporation of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, title to the park was transferred from the County to the City. This park features a community building with a small activity room and patio which are available for rent, a tot lot, playground, picnic areas with barbecues, fields, and a baseball diamond. Views from this park are superior, and the mature trees add to the atmosphere. Recommendations: • Remodel or build new community building. Original building dates back to the 1960s. Larger building could accommodate more rentals and classes. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible. • Improved Amenities: Benches, picnic tables, BBQs, trash/recycling cans. • Install shade structures in the picnic areas. • Fiber optic cabling to allow for unified communication with City Hall. 34 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 35 Vista Catalina Park Vista Catalina is a small pocket park located adjacent to PV Drive South at the main entrance to Trump National across from Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park. The Park has magnificent views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina Island. Recommendations: • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping, where feasible • Continue to work with Trump National staff to maintain its attractive appearance and accessibility. RELATED PLANS Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Public Use Master Plan (PUMP) The Palos Verdes Nature Preserve (Preserve) encompasses approximately 1,450 acres comprised of ten individual Reserves, 424 acres of which consists of the Portuguese Bend Reserve. The Preserve is owned by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes and is managed by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy (PVPLC) for ecological values and habitat restoration. This preserve is home to coastal sage scrub habitat, a community of intensely fragrant and highly drought resistant native shrubs and flowering plants. Living throughout this rare habitat are many different animals, including the threatened California gnatcatcher and coastal cactus wren and two species of endangered butterflies. The individual reserves provide excellent recreational opportunities, as they are full of networks of hiking, equestrian, and bicycle trails. There are 33 miles of hiking, equestrian, and mountain bike trails available to the public. The Preserve PUMP was established in 2006 and addresses issues germane to the Preserve such as public access, trailhead locations, parking, trail use, fencing, signage and lighting. The Palos Verdes Nature Preserve already has a well-established system for receiving public input, reporting incidents, and initiating changes, and pursuing enhancements to the existing Preserve. The PUMP is subject to periodic review and updates by the City Council with input from the public. Trails Network Plan Update A significant effort to combine and unify the various City trails -related plan is currently underway. Several public workshops have already been conducted. The Trails Network Plan Update is being facilitated by the Community Development Department and seeks to consolidate and update the following plans: ✓ Conceptual Bikeways Plan -updated 1996 ✓ Conceptual Trails Plan- updated 1993 ✓ Preserve Trails Plan ✓ Ocean Front Estates Trails 35 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 36 ✓ Terranea Resort Trails ✓ Trump National Trails ✓ California Coastal Trail Proposed changes are subject to public input and City Council approval and will be reviewed for consistent with the PMPU. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The PMPU has eight appendices. Appendix A: 1989 Parks Master Plan Update Appendix B: 2005 Open Space Planning & Recreation and Parks Task Force Final Report Appendix C: Coast Vision Plan Report and Amendments Appendix D. Comprehensive Public Outreach Results (Includes Public Workshop Summaries, Public Workshop Comment Cards, Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise results, Summary of emails received separated by subject, Complete Online Survey Results with summary of open-ended question responses. Appendix E Sport Fields/Facilities/Skate Park/Youth League Information Appendix F: Status/Update of 1989 Parks Master Plan Recommendations Appendix G: Ladera Linda Community Center Resident -Generated Questionaire Appendix H: Park Amenities FISCAL IMPACT The precise fiscal impact is difficult to determine due to a number of factors. The scope of many of the projects, particularly significant ones such as Ladera Linda and Point Vicente Park/Civic Center will likely changes as their respective master plan processes are developed and the size, scale and quantities of amenities are determined. A number of projects are scheduled to be phased in over 3-5 years. More precise cost estimates will be developed as those projects move forward in the future. The current estimated costs for the projects (which does not include maintenance and operation expenses) ranges from $19,171,000 to $25,469,000. CONCLUSION Much has changed since the Parks Master Plan was last updated in 1989, but much remains the same. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes' beautiful parks, magnificent open space, and endless vistas continue to be both a source of tremendous community pride and also a 36 Parks Master Plan Update Date: June 30, 2015 Page 37 boundless avenue for a wide range of recreation possibilities. After a significant public outreach effort, this draft Parks Master Plan Update seeks to further that legacy by judiciously enhancing park amenities while honoring the previous and ongoing contributions of innumerable dedicated residents, elected officials and staff. Attachments Draft Parks Master Plan Update (page38) May 20, 2014 Parks Master Plan Update and Enhancement -Staff Implementation and Follow -Up Report Study Session Item from Councilwoman Susan Brooks (page 114 ) July 29, 2014 Point Vicente Park Skate Park Feasibility Staff Report (page 115 ) September 15, 2014 Letter from David Siegenthaler, National Park Service (page 151) 37 City of Rancho Palos Verdes �) Parks Master Plan Update Submitted June 30, 2015 Draft IAA 011, PARKS MASTER. PLAN UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: INTRODUCTION APURPOSE ................................................................. ._____._-._.._.._.._._.._.._.__----_--____-__.._._.._3-4 B. BACKGROUND ...........................................................•-------------•-------------•------------.,......_...4-5 C. PUBLIC OUTREACH PROCESS_...............__-------------------------------------------------_--____-__..._._.5-21 D. RECREATIONAL GOOAL IOBJE TI 'E..................................................................21-22 SECTION II: PARKS AND OPEN SPACE A_ PARKLAND STANDARDS AND CURRENT USAGE ------------- ------------- ------------ -----.22-26 CITY RECREATI0NAL STAN DARDS .............. 22 G ENE.P.4L PLAN DE.BI GNATIONS............................................................. ----------- ..__..__..22-25 B_ PARKIftilVElTORY1-......_.._._._..__._.._.._._..._._.._.._.-..._._.._ ............._.._._..._._.._.._.__-__--------___-__-2!F�_26 I- PARK MAP...----.--------•......----•........._...----------------------------•---------- --•---------- ----------.........27 2_ PARK,a aGE.------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------- --------........... 28 3- REOOMMEIDATIONS & PRI (TIES.--...._.......--._------ ........................... --.....------------..29-35 4_ PARD SATES 35-75 A ABALONE COVE..----------------- ---------------- -------------- ------------- ------------- B- DEL CERRO PARK ........................... „......................................................... O. DoN O. WALLACE RADIO RANCHO MUSEUM PARK ...................................... D. E TTVIEWP RK----------------------------- ............. ............. ............... E_ FOUNDERS PARK_ __......................... .........•----:...--............. ............. P. FRANK A- VANDERLIP PARK ......................................... ............................. O. FRED HESSE JR_ OI]I4 muNrry PARK ............................................................. H. ATE',PaAY PARK .................... --•-------------------------- -------.----- I. LADERA LINDA. PARK............ ............. •--•....... ___ ....................... J. GAG Poly,TVICENTE------------------------------------------------------------------------------ K. MARILYN RYAN SUNSET POINT PAW- ------------------ -----------------------------._-._.._._ L_ NIARTINGALE TRAILHEAD PARK .......... •--.---------_-•............. .............................. M. PELICAN POINT --------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- ---------------- --------------N. N . POINT VICENTE PA.RWGI;.SIC CENTER....._.... .......................... 0. RDI3ERT E. RYAN PARK ..................... ------------- -------------------------- --------------- P. kK1 BEACH ........... _.................... -.......................... ------------- ------------- Q. VISTA CATALINA PARK ----------- ----------- ---------------------------- -------------- ---------------- 5. RELATED PLANS A- PALOS VERDES NATURE PRESERVE $ PUMP ...._..... ...................•............. -.....75 B. TRAILS NETwoRK PLA.N UPD.ATE......-------------.-------------.....----------....-----•..........---.75 A. 1989 PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDA IF....------......----------•---•---•........._------------•-------•------------.--------•-----------•----- B_ 2005 OPEN SPACE PIANNMG & REAMEATIONAND PARKS TASK. FORCE REPORT __._..------------•-__-- C_ CO_kST VISION PLAN REPORT A`.N_D AbJENDMENTS ------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- -- D_ Gbf yFJMR.I,TSRTPT)BLIC CUTUMEE. SPORT FEE9_DS.-FAi-'1.TT .SKATE. PARK-YOU'THLEAGLIF ITS]FOI IATICN----•-----•-------.-----.----------- F_ STATUS SATE OF 1989 PARKS IIASTER PLAN RE.CODMdENDATIONS ..._.-_-_.-_-._------------------.-__-- G. LADERALENI A REE DI)ENT- GENERATEDSUMEY............... .-................................._.._..............._..............._.._ H. PARKA.MEN......................................................................................._._.._..............................._.._................... Parks Master Plan Update 2 39 I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose The purpose of the 2015 Parks Master Plan Update (PMPU) is to update the 1989 Parks Master Plan and to set forth a comprehensive strategy for addressing the future planning of the City's parks, recreation, and open space resources. The PMPU will function as a living document to help guide and respond to changes in the City's future park, open space and recreational needs. The PMPU presents updated information on each of the City's Park sites and identifies specific and general recommendations. The PMPU is not intended to be strictly binding to present and future City Councils and the City residents, but instead should function as a long range vision for the provision of recreation opportunities, with a flexible framework than can be adapted to changes in technology, demographics, economic realities, and recreational trends and preferences. Recommendations were informed and determined by a combination of factors including responses at twelve public workshops, City Council goals and direction, online survey results, recreation facilities and programs at neighboring cities, athletic leagues, input from other City Departments, emails and input from the public, and professional recreation expertise. Much has been accomplished since the creation of the 1989 Parks Master Plan. In the 26 years since its adoption, numerous recreation goals and milestones have been achieved through the City's continuing dedication and commitment to providing a diverse and challenging recreation environment for the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes. The PMPU does not seek to re -invent the wheel, but instead combines and encapsulates the over quarter-century of achievements and effort that came before it. The PMPU is informed by existing City documents including: • City General Plan • The Coast Vision Plan • 1989 Parks Master Plan • Five Year Capital Improvement Program • Park Inventory While not adopted by the City Council, the extensive work, research, and recommendations generated by the Open Space Planning, and Recreation and Parks Task Force which met from 2002-2005 was considered as well. Recent and ongoing conceptual planning and public outreach/design efforts for sites and projects such as Grandview Park, Lower Hesse Park, Lower Point Vicente, and the Trails Network Plan Update are also key components of this plan. Rather than duplicate those efforts, the PMPU instead incorporates those recently completed and still -ongoing processes. Similarly, while the PMPU provides updated information about the majestic Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, which did not exist in 1989, it does not Parks Master Plan Update 3 it seek to duplicate the massive public outreach and planning process that went into that acquisition and is still ongoing. The PMPU includes the following components: 1. Background on Master Plan Procedure 2. Public Outreach Process 3. General Goals 4. Analysis of current recreation/parks usage 5. Master list of recommendations 6. Park Inventory including acquisition history, existing information, deed restrictions and possible recommendations 7. Joint Use Agreements/Partnerships/Leases 8. Status/Update of 1989 Master Plan Recommendations 9. Sports Field/Facilities Inventory B. Background The City's existing Parks Master Plan was adopted on October 17, 1989. Now 26 years old, the 1989 Plan was created by a 15 -member ad hoc committee established by the City Council. The committee, which divided itself into three five -member subcommittees each assigned to study a particular region of the City (Westside, Coastal and Eastside), worked over a six-month period to solicit input from the community in a variety of ways, including a citizen survey, public workshops, meetings with special interest groups, written correspondence, and contact with homeowners associations and individual residents. The resulting Plan contains an extensive list of policies, goals and recommendations regarding the park and recreational needs of the community at that time, as well as factual information and recommended improvements for each park site in the City. (Appendix A: 1989 Parks Master Plan and Appendix F: Status Update of 1989 Master Plan Recommendations) Since the 1989 Master Plan Update, the City has acquired several new park sites and significant open space areas, including the now 1,450 acre Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The most comprehensive previous attempt to update the Parks Master Plan occurred in 2002 when the City Council expanded the seven -member Recreation and Parks Committee into an eighteen - member Open Space Planning, and Recreation & Parks Task Force (Task Force). The Task Force, whose membership included a broad spectrum of interests concerning the recreation, parks and open space issues affecting the community, was charged with investigating all of the City's existing resources and unmet needs, and advising the City Council on updating the 1989 Parks Master Plan, including making recommendations for utilization of City parks and open space properties. The Task Force, which organized itself into eight subcommittees, eventually presented a strategic plan to the City Council in 2004. The plan, which included dozens of recommendations for park sites and an extensive set of recreation options for Upper Point Vicente in particular, was not adopted by City Council and the Task Force was officially dissolved in 2005. (Appendix B Open Space Planning and Recreation & Parks Task Force Report) More recently, the Coast Vision Plan was adopted by the City Council on September 2, 2008. The Coast Vision Plan represented over two years of planning and an extensive public outreach effort to create an informational planning document for the City's coastal areas. The Coast Vision Plan includes the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve and five additional sites: Upper Point Vicente, Lower Point Vicente, Abalone Cove, Gateway Park, and Del Cerro. The Plan also addressed improvements and recommendations related to public access, interpretive materials, and Parks Master Plan Update 4 41 recreational amenities and facilities to improve the experience of the coast and open space for residents and visitors. While many of the Coast Vision Plan recommendations have not been significantly affected by developments since its adoption, several sites have been impacted by subsequent actions including the Annenberg Foundation's withdrawal of its development proposal at Lower Point Vicente in 2011 and the Council's conceptual approval of including a skate park at Upper Point Vicente in 2014. (Appendix C: Coast Vision Plan w/ Amendments) The Coast Vision Plan was updated in 2012 to remove the Annenberg Proposal at Lower Point Vicente Park. A public outreach process is currently underway to develop an updated plan for Lower Point Vicente that would be incorporated into the Council -adopted Coast Vision Plan. Once the PMPU is adopted, any impacted elements of the Coastal Vision Plan will also need to be updated. C. The Public Outreach Process Maximizing public awareness and involvement was a central component of a thoughtful and thorough Parks Master Plan Update. The public was notified of the PMPU and its various workshops by the following methods: • Mass mailing to all City residences in October 2014 • Updates on City's Website • Creation of a Parks Master Plan Update City Webpage • Multiple Listsery messages • Multiple Notifications on Facebook and Nextdoor social media sites • Recreation Activity Guides • Public Banners • Press Releases • HOA Notifications • Mailings to residences adjacent to park sites discussed at workshops • Contacting stakeholders and interested parties The centerpieces of the public outreach effort were a series of twelve public workshops held from November, 2014 through February, 2015 and an online survey. Facilitated Public Workshops Facilitated public workshops were held from November 2014 through February 2015. The workshops were focused on particular park sites and were designed to obtain detailed feedback on current and possible uses at each location. Two workshops each were held for five park sites: Eastview, Ladera Linda Park, Point Vicente Park/Civic Center, Upper Hesse Park, and Gateway Park. The public workshop process concluded with two general workshops which covered the five focus parks sites as well as all other park sites and open space areas. All twelve workshops were held on Wednesday evenings, from 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm. Below is a list of the workshop locations and dates. Date 1. Wed. Nov. 5 2. Wed. Nov. 12 3. Wed. Nov. 19 4. Wed. Dec. 3 5. Wed. Dec. 10 6. Wed. Jan. 14 Topic Eastview #1 Ladera Linda #1 Pt. Vicente Park/Civic Ctr #1 Hesse Park #1 Gateway #I Eastview #2 Location Peck Park LL/MPR CH/Comm Room HP/McTaggart LL/MPR Peck Park Parks Master Plan Update 5 42 7. Wed. Jan. 21 8. Wed. Jan. 28 9. Wed. Feb. 4 10. Wed. Feb. 11 11. Wed. Feb. 18 12. Wed. Feb. 25 Ladera Linda #2 Pt. Vicente Park/Civic Ctr #2 Gateway #2 Hesse Park #2 General Master Plan #1 General Master Plan #2 LL/MPR CH/Comm Room LL/MPR HP/McTaggart LL/MPR HP/McTaggart Online Survey While public workshops tend to attract people who live near to a particular site or have an interest in a particular recreation topic, a survey generates more general, community -wide responses to a series of recreation topics. The online survey, run through the website Survey Monkey, was approved by the City Council and was subsequently completed by 743 respondents from November 21, 2015 to its closing on March 15, 2015. Questions ranged from general attitudes about parks and open space topics to very specific questions about support for components at Ladera Linda Park and Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. This was not a professional or statistically valid survey, but its results did provide many insights. Review of Recent Public Workshops and Outreach Efforts Staff also utilized materials and feedback from recent public workshops and focus groups that examined a number of high-profile City areas and park sites including the Coastal Vision Plan, Grandview Park, Lower Hesse Park, and Lower Point Vicente Park. Outcomes of the Public Outreach Process The following findings and conclusions were developed from the results of the 2014-15 Parks Master Plan Update public outreach process (see the more complete Public Outreach Report in Appendix D which includes spreadsheets showing all emails received, complete online survey results including lists/charts of all individual comments from the online survey, lists of all individual comments from workshop comment cards, and all public workshop "tape dot exercises"). Specific park recommendations are discussed in the individual Park Sites section of this document. Online Survey Analysis 743 total responses were received from November 2014 through March 2015. 87% of respondents said they lived in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Responses were received from all sections of the City. 75% of respondents rated the the City's Recreation and Parks Department as either "great" or 11good" on its ability to provide physical parks and facilities to the public. Sixty-two percent rated the Department as "great" or "good" on its ability to provide recreation programs, activities and events. Overall, how would you rate the City of Overall, how would you rate the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Rancho Palos Verdes Recreation and Parks Department in its ability to provide physical Department in its ability to provide physical parks and facilitie> to the public? Check parks and facilitie<3 to the public? Check the appropriate circle. the appropriate circle. Answeretl: SkupPe Ana ,re d:l36 Skm d:l Great Guotl Adequate Fair Not meeting eapectetiona 90% 20% 30% 40% 511% 60% 70% 60% 90% 100% Great Goatl II, Adequate Fei, Notmeetin® ezpectationa Parks Master Plan Update 6 43 Respondents were asked to inidcate their general address by filling in their cross streets. The great majority of respondents were RPV residents. Below is a graphic represenation of RPV resident respondent locations. Larger bubbles indicate a higher numbe of respondents from particular cross streets. The lowest level of responses came from the eastern section of the City while the most responses came from the southern area near Ladera Linda and the northwest section of the City. CROSS STREETS _ ---�- TORRA,NCE LOMVTA f F-/ PALOS VERDES ESTATES +� - /T ell rr- Y 0 x� 1 .. LL No, of People LOS ANGELES 32 _ Y 16-17 13-15 i 11-12 9-16 7-a i5 -s • 3-4 • 1-2 Miles a 4-35 0-7 1-4 In order to get a sense of how survey respondents spend their leisure time, a number of recreation activities and options were presented. Respondents were asked to check all activities that they participated in on a monthly basis. Not surprisingly, given the City's emphasis on open space and trails, 87% of respondents selected "hiking, walking and jogging" which was by far the most popular choice. Other notable results include "Swimming" (29%), "Going to the beach" (56%), "Skateboarding" (22%), "Using a dog park " (29%), "Working Out at a Gym" (36%), "road biking" (19%). "picnicking or relaxing at a local park" (40%), "Tennis" (15%), "Participating in senior programs" (14%), and `Mountain biking" (11%). Team sports percentages range from 2.8% for lacrosse up to 18% for soccer. The combined team sports percentage is approximately 46%. While team sports are clearly popular, participation levels were higher for non -team, individual activities such as surfing (18%), skateboarding (22%), road biking (19%), mountain biking (11%), horseback riding (8.4%) and golfing (16%). The variety of responses clearly demonstrates that survey respondents, the great majority of whom are RPV residents, participate in a wide range of sports and recreation activities. Parks Master Plan Update 7 Ev Below is the full list of activities that survey respondents or their families participated in on a monthly basis: F lklfK - walking im— mavnig LaperDaea Surnng Flar--aban riding Going t-ttti9 P xx tn — SFunte6oarding. uearrtg ;a dig park VMrking out at , a 'gym sting Parin _ In nlo[_.. a -p rcattall Golfing Playing ROard 13] Kin 1310111 Ing ar relaxing et ... Tennie Parbolpating In amRr- .. .tuna Irg En W-1 8pecial... MDunta3ln raining — Playing de.St011 P13ging eon -sr Playing , 001t),311 P1a}Ing rcattall Playing w lle} ball Parks Master Plan Update 8 45 Answer Choices Hiking, rlra king or jogging .............. — Lacrosse — Horseback riding - Going to the beach — Skatebaarding — Using a dog park - Working out at a gym — 13'ar6cipating in senior programs - staffing — Road Wing — I nlcleng or relaxing at a IncaI parK - Tennis — Participating in an RPV recreation program - Attending an RPV special event Responses 87.25® 623 29.27% 209 2.80% 20 18.Tir% 134 8.40% 60 56.30% 402 22.2T% 159 29.55% 211 36.69% 26.2 14.57% 104 16.81% 1201 191.06% 136 40.90% 292 16.83% 1 ' 3 4.62% 33 1T.51% 125 Mountain biking 11.49% 82 Playing baseball 7.42*. 53 Playing soccer 18.49% 132 Playing so tilal.1 4.06% 29 Playing football 5.32% 38 Playing volleyball 9.24% 66 Tutai Responder t<. _ : 4 The survey revealed moderate support for developing additional recreation elements such as playing fields and basketball or tennis courts (44% support/33% don't support) and greater support for building physical facilities such as a community center, gym, pool, or children's playground (52% support/30% don't support). Development of additional playing fields Building of physical recreation facilities and outdoor recreation elements such as such as a community center, gymnasium, basketball or tennis courts pool or children's playground -..zry 4 717 +MppW: 26 17 WPM: 3f &wc.t Om'I aypdt - [wn4 support - N.1m N. CPIft. Haws No aPF.I.. 9% 1U%. Til'6 3tis.. C9% 56% 69.6 ]�% 60K 90% 10tH: 9% 16% 71% 30% 40% Sm 60% 77% 80% 9M 101Y% Parks Master Plan Update 9 Me Public support for preserving undeveloped land for wildlife and natural habitat remains strong at 82% with only 7% not supporting. This high level of support for open space dovetails with the 87% of respondents who say they hike or walk on a monthly basis, as well as respondents who ride horses (8%) or go mountain biking (11%). A significant portion of the survey focused on two sites: Ladera Linda Community Center and Point Vicente Park/Civic Center (City Hall). Point Vicente Park/Civic Center was selected because a large percentage of its flat, developable area is currently undeveloped and it has been the focus of previous planning processes including the Coast Vision Plan and Open Space Task Force efforts. Ladera Linda Community Center was selected because it has been identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan as being a candidate for renovation or demolition/rebuilding because of the poor condition of its buildings and infrastructure. More information about these two location and suggeted recommendations can be found in the individual Park Sites section of this report. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center: Online Survey Results Respondents were asked to indicate their support, lack of support, or no opinion on a range of possible site amenities. The elements that received the highest level of support were all relatively modest improvements, none of which included habitable buildings, such as walking paths with fitness stations, a children's playground, a permanent dog park, a village green, and an amphitheater. Athletic facilities such as a gymnasium, pool, tennis cours, or basketball courts received relatively close results with more oppostion than support. A skate park, which has been identified by Council as a potential element for this site, received almost identical scores of "support" and "don't support" . An arts/cultural center had slightly more oppostion than support. Paint Vicente Park/Civic Center Online Survey Results 7a.� 3O.V�EG O' 1`f � �� l f� CS q`l lS �'• O� .�Ci S`a' fi�y5fi� a.0, ■ Support Don't Support ■ No Opinion Parks Master Plan Update 10 47 Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Combined Survey Responses The survey incuded an open-ended question allowing respondents to list anything not listed above "that you would like to see at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. 143 survey respondents answered this questions with 599 abstaining. Many respondents opted to list items that were included on the previous list of survey questions. Not surprisingly, there was a wide range of responses from disc golf to yoga. The topics that received the most positive responses were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports -related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents indicated that the there was no need for any changes. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in Appendix D Online Survey: Point Vicente Survey Open Ended SUMMARY Support Don't Suppnrt No Opinion Building a multiple -sport gymnasium 33.24% 42.42% 24.3496 Building an outdoor swimming pool 37.41% 43.53% 19.45% Adding more outdoor tennis or paddle tennis courts 29.07% 41.31% 291.62% Building a band shell or amphitheater 55.08% 23.64% 21.28 Building a skate park 42.56% 41,85% 15.5x% Adding playing fields for soccer, baseball and other field sports 37.97% 35.38% 26.15% Creating a village green With gardens and walkways 62.03% 16.97% 21% Providing a permanent dog park 51.60% 30,74% 17.66% Building walking paths with fitness stations 67.45% 17.25% 15.3D% Building outdoor basketball courts 34.77% 35.47% 29.75% Building bocce ball courts 27.82% 35.61% 36.5&% Building a Children's playground 51.74% 23.64% 24.62% Building a tricycle park for tots 28.79% 46.79% 30.45% Building an aft/cultural center 34.77% 38.39% 26.84% The survey incuded an open-ended question allowing respondents to list anything not listed above "that you would like to see at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. 143 survey respondents answered this questions with 599 abstaining. Many respondents opted to list items that were included on the previous list of survey questions. Not surprisingly, there was a wide range of responses from disc golf to yoga. The topics that received the most positive responses were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports -related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents indicated that the there was no need for any changes. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in Appendix D Online Survey: Point Vicente Survey Open Ended SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 24 2. No skateboard park 4 3. Pro -Pool 9 4. Pro -Dog park 7 5. Sports Related 25 6. Open Spaces/Trails Hiking/Nature/Gardens 29 7. Equestrian 2 8. Community Center/Youth Activities/Facility Rentals 15 9. Seniors 4 10. Youth 4 11. General Facility/Maintenance 11 12. Miscellaneous 11 Ladera Linda Park: Online Survey Results Respondents were also asked to indicate their support, lack of support, or no opinion on a range of possible site amenities at Ladera Linda Park. The elements that received the highest level of support were walking paths with fitness stations, expanded nature center, athletic fields, and a new community center. Athletic facilities such as a gymnasium, pool, tennis courts, or basketball courts again received relatively close results with more oppostion than support. There was significantly higher support for adding tennis courts rather than build additional paddle tennis courts. Parks Master Plan Update 11 Kine WUILOJ 70.00%% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.04% 10.004E 0.00% New Walking Gymnasium Additional Community paths with Paddle Center fitness Tennis Ladera stations Courts Linda (cu rre ntly Walking paths with fitness stations two) ■ Support Ladera Linda Online Survey Results 11111111111111 Tennis Borce Ball Expanded Athletic Indoor Pool Outdoor Tri -cycle Courts Courts Nature Fields Pool Park for (currently Center Tats none) Don't Support ■ No Opinion Ladera Linda Park Combined Survey Responses The survey again incuded an open-ended question allowing respondents to list anything not listed above "that you would like to see at Ladera Linda Park". 168 survey respondents answered this questions with 575 respondents abstaining. Clearly showing some direct correlation with responses to the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center responses, the most popular answers were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents advocated for new and enhanced community center, and improved park amenities, security and maintenance. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in Appendix D. Online Survey: Ladera Linda Survey Open Ended SUMMARY Support Don't Support No Opinion New con nunity Center atjsiAr.i� Linda 37.46% 27.31% 2 Walking paths with fitness stations 55.41% 13.4596 Ir 21.159& •Gyrnnasiurn 29.27% 35,24% 32.49% Additional Paddle tennis Courts (currently two) 17.65% 4DA6% 42.3D% Tennis Courts (currently nine) 3'5.011% 36,81% 34.17% Bocce Ball Court(s) 27.73% 29.69% 42.55% Expanded Nature Center 51.54% 211.17% 25.2936 Athletic Fields 47.201% 22.41% 30.3996 Indoor Pool 32.41% 41.60% 25.4936 Outdoor Pool 33.75% 4D.34% 25.91% Tricycle Park tsar Tots 31.51% 30.81% 37.63% The survey again incuded an open-ended question allowing respondents to list anything not listed above "that you would like to see at Ladera Linda Park". 168 survey respondents answered this questions with 575 respondents abstaining. Clearly showing some direct correlation with responses to the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center responses, the most popular answers were skate park, pool, dog park, various sports related suggestions, and open space/trails issues. Many respondents advocated for new and enhanced community center, and improved park amenities, security and maintenance. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in Appendix D. Online Survey: Ladera Linda Survey Open Ended SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 38 2. No skateboard park 2 3. Pro -Pool 16 4. No pool 4 5. Pro -Dog park 14 6. Sports Related 27 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 22 Parks Master Plan Update 12 8. Equestrian 7 9. Community Center 5 10. Youth 11 11. Security Concerns 6 12. General Facility/Maintenance 15 13. Miscellaneous 6 The survey concluded with two open-ended questions. The first was "In your opinion what is the single most important thing the City of Rancho Palos Verdes' Recreation and Parks Department can do to improve the quality of life for its residents?" 474 people responded; 269 skipped this question. The open-ended nature of the question generated a wide range of responses. Sixty people mentioned skate parks, the great majority in favor. Approximately fifteen responses were pro dog -park. The most common response category with over 140 entries was open space/nature/trails responses with the majority expressing variants of maintaining and preserving open space and trails. There were also many requests for additional recreational amenities and programs for youth and seniors. Other popular topics addressed included parking and preserve access at Gateway Park and Del Cerro Park, and safety/security concerns, and to simply do nothing -no changes needed. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in Appendix D. Online Survey: Single Most Important Issue SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -skateboard park 60 2. No skateboard park 1 3. Pro -Pool 42 4. No pool 2 5. Pro -Dog park 16 6.Sports Related 32 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 149 8. Equestrian 5 9. Community Center/Facility Rentals 35 9. Seniors 15 10. Youth 14 11. General Facility/Maintenance 25 12. Parking Issues 26 13. Security Concerns 20 14. Miscellaneous 55 The last question of the survey allowed respondents to offer anything else they wished to share. Survey fatigue may have set in by this point because only 222 respondents answered with 521 respondents skipping this question. General response categories were similar to the previous question, but with a marked increase in responses opposed to Gateway Park and requesting that something be done to mitigate parking impacts in the Del Cerro neighborhood. Below is a summary of responses. A full listing of responses is included in the Appendix D. Online Survey: Any Additional Response SUMMARY # of comments 1. Pro -Skateboard park 28 Parks Master Plan Update 13 2. No skateboard park 6 3. Pro -Pool 18 4. No pool 1 5. Pro -Dog Park 18 6. Sports Related 11 7. Open Spaces/Trails/Hiking/Nature/Gardens 27 8. Equestrian 4 9. Community Center/Facility Rentals 21 10. Youth 4 11. Seniors 2 12. General Facility/Maintenance 21 13. Parking Issues 22 14. Security Concerns 6 15. Miscellaneous 32 Public Workshop Analysis Eastview Park Two public workshops were held regarding Eastview Park at Peck Park in San Pedro on November 5, 2014 and January 14, 2015. Approximately 10 people attended each session. Discussion was lively and wide-ranging. The most -discussed topic by far was a proposed fenced dog park. Attendees at the first workshop were fairly receptive to the idea and favored a plan that located it near the stores on the western part of the park away from the homes on the eastside of the park. Attendees at the second workshop were strongly opposed to the dog park. Elements that received support were shade structures, improved picnic area, and wide walking paths. Fitness stations received mixed reviews, while a dog park, allowing moon bounces and BBQs received the lowest level support. Many attendees reported incidents of dogs off leash. Concerns were raised about maintenance, feral cats, graffiti, and occasional vandalism. A consistent desire was expressed to maintain the park's low-key neighborhood feel. Below is a chart showing Eastview Workshop attendee responses. Eastview Park Public Workshop Exercise Results u Shade Structures Fitness $tatlorss P6CMC Areas Dog Park E R(b Wider W'alk;rrg Paths ■ G rest I dea It's OK ■ So So ■ No Parks Master Plan Update 14 51 A comment card summary from the Eastview Workshops is in Appendix D. Gateway Park The two Gateway Park workshops which were held at Ladera Linda Park on December 3, 2014 and February 4, 2015 were the most well -attended and liveliest of all the public workshops. Approximately 80 people attended each workshop. A majority of speakers and attendees spoke out against the Gateway project. A number of attendees from the Del Cerro neighborhood spoke in favor of the project and expressed frustration at the traffic and congestion issues they were experiencing near the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve trailhead at the end of Crenshaw Boulevard. While many Gateway Park opponents were sympathetic to the Del Cerro issue, they raised a number of concerns about Gateway Park: ➢ Safety, particularly following a drowning death and numerous rescues in July 2014 ➢ Access and traffic ➢ Neighborhood impact ➢ Social media and rising attendance at the Preserve and beaches ➢ Doubts about the effectiveness in relieving Del Cerro congestion ➢ Questions about the availability of other parking lots ➢ Enforcement concerns ➢ Concerns that people would not utilize Gateway Park to access Preserve, but would cross Palos Verdes Dr Drive South to access nearby beaches Staff received a substantial number of emails regarding Gateway Park and Del Cerro Park. A spreadsheet of the emails is in the Public Outreach in Appendix D. Below is a chart showing combined Gateway Workshop responses. V 77 30 x w s Pic nic% Sitting Areas Gateway Park Public Workshop Exercise Results Educatiorial Kiasks Staff/ Ranger Portable Emergency Response TrO er e€5 ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So 0 No 1 Parking Lot Parks Master Plan Update 15 52 A comment card summary from the Gateway workshops is in Appendix D. Upper Hesse Park Two Upper Hesse Park workshops were held on December 10, 2014 and February 11, 2014. Approximately 15-20 people attended each workshop. Both workshops featured an update on the Lower Hesse Park planning process, but the focus was on Upper Hesse Park. Attendees were most positive about adding shade structures, fitness stations, improved viewpoints, drought -resistant amenities, and tricycle park for tots, and replacing storage containers with a permanent solution. Attendees were mixed or negative about expanding the John C. McTaggart Hall patio, or adding bocce ball courts. Concerns were raised about financing, management, traffic, views and adding recreation activities for youth teens and adults. There was a strong general consensus that no significant changes were needed. Below are charts showing combined Upper Hesse Park Workshop responses. Hesse Park Public WorkshopTape Det Exerds.e Ras alts M A L. s Shade StrWrture Fitness Stators Improved Expand W.Taggart Crought Peskta r►t View.poInts Hal POW Landsrap■ng ■ Great Idea It's OK 0 So So 0 No ■ INE TrkVcb Park For Bavcca Bali Cc*r. i"nhance-d Pknlr Roplare Skaraga Tab Table%& Be°nCFxS CanLainers w'/P_ ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No A comment card summary from the Upper Hesse Park Workshops is in Appendix D. Parks Master Plan Update 16 53 Ladera Linda Park Two Ladera Linda Parks public workshops were held on November 12, 2014 and January 21, 2015. Approximately 20-25 people attended each workshop. Attendees had a strong positive response to a new community center with Sheriff/Park Ranger drop-in office and an expanded nature center. They expressed varying levels of support for maintaining the current multi -use lower field, improved amenities, paddle/tennis courts and adding fitness stations. Improvements to the existing paddle tennis courts were requested. There was strong opposition to a pool, gymnasium, dog park and BBQs. Attendees expressed a desire to maintain a low-key neighborhood feel. Most attendees said their favorite activity was hiking or walking. Below are charts showing combined Ladera Linda Park Workshop responses. Ladera Linda Community Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 40 �3 a 20 E beat ilea ft's OK ■ So So ■ No Parks Master Plan Update 17 M Lades Linda Community Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results W 35 30 2S 2D 15 w a , = I 1 ■ ■ Park Amenit es New Cornrtnuntty Dog Park Cerner in= I 11. N2tUre Center Gyri Tricycle Course 0 Great Idea It's OK ■ Seg 5o i No A comment card summary from the Ladera Linda Park Workshops is in Appendix D. Local Ladera Linda residents conducted their own informal survey on opinions about the size of a potential new community center, possible community center components, recreation facilities and other community issues. The results can be found in Appendix G. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Two Point Vicente Park/Civic Center public workshops were held on November 19, 2014 and January 28, 2015. Approximately 15-20 people attended each workshop. Many possible futures uses were discussed along with the history of the site and the work of the Open Space Task Force and Coast Vision Plan. The components that received the strongest support were the skate park/skate plaza, improved park amenities, a pool, walking paths, and a village green. Ideas that received the least support were bocce ball courts, tennis/paddle tennis courts, a gym, arts/cultural center and tricycle course. There was mixed support for playing fields. Concerns were raised about lighting and security, financing of projects, potential crowding of the site, long term maintenance costs and liability. Parks Master Plan Update 18 55 Below are charts showing combined Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Workshop responses. J Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Community Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 25 20 15 10 n 5kate Shade /BB4s Arts/Cultural Dag Park Park/Skate / Picnic Center Plaza Tables ■ 11 11.1 M ■ Children's Gyrn Tricycle Playground Course for Tots ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 38 i2 10 Great ldea It's OK Skate Park/Skate Plaza 20 0 Shade /BBQs / Picnic Tables 15 4 Arts/Cultural Center 1 1 Dog Park 2 6 Children's Playground 3 5 Gyne d 2 Tricycle Course forTuts 2 3 Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results 38 i2 10 Great Idea 6 6 4 Walking Paths w/ Fitness Static ns � 1 Bocce Ball Courts 3 2 2 Village Green wf Asrn{ahitheatre 7 3 TennisfPaddleTennis Courts B 3 1 Walking Paths with Bocce Ball Courts Village Green w/ Tennis/Paddle Tennis. Pool Multi-purpose playing Fitness Sations 5 Amphitheatre Courts fields ■ Great Idea It's OK ■ So So ■ No A comment card summary from the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Workshops is in Appendix D. Parks Master Plan Update 19 56 Great Idea It's OK Soso No Walking Paths w/ Fitness Static ns � 1 Bocce Ball Courts 3 2 2 Village Green wf Asrn{ahitheatre 7 3 TennisfPaddleTennis Courts B 3 1 Pool 7 4 Multi-purpose (playing fields 8 5 A comment card summary from the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Workshops is in Appendix D. Parks Master Plan Update 19 56 General Workshops Two General PMPU workshops were held on February 18, 2015 at Ladera Linda Park and February 25, 2015 at Hesse Park. Staff presented an overview of the PMPU process and a review of all the prior workshops. Staff also presented information about all of the City's additional park sites and updates on current park design/planning efforts such as Lower Hesse Park and Lower Point Vicente Park. Input was very wide ranging at both workshops. Comments and concerns were expressed regarding a senior center, safety, security, Gateway Park, Del Cerro Park, landslide area, passive vs. active uses, emergency supplies, an equestrian center, a new community center at Ladera Linda, and additional activities for youth and teenagers. There was a general sense that when it came to development, that less was more. Below are charts showing combined General Parks PMPU Workshop responses. General Master Phan Public Workshop Tape Dot Exercise Results .3a 25 29 15 10 5 ■ ■ _■ Outdoor Basketball Preserve: Adjacent New Community Courts NatuFeCenter Center. Ladera Linda ■ Great Idea Preserving Building Athletic Additional Paddle Preserve -Access Undeveloped Land Recreation Tennis/Basketball ParldngatGateway Facilities Courts park It's IDK ■ So So ■ No Parks Master Plan Update 20 57 Great Idea It's OK OUtdOUr Basketball Courts 3 12 Preserve: Adjacent Nature Center is 3 New Community Center: Ladera Linda is 2 Preserving Undeveloped Land 24 4 Building Athletic Recreation Faitie.5 13 Additional Paddle Tennis/Basket6aI1 Courts i Preserveaccess Parking at Gateway park 1 Parks Master Plan Update 20 57 A comment card summary from the General Park Workshops is in Appendix D. D. Recreational Goals/Objectives In addition to input from the public via the online survey, public workshops and emails, City recreation standards, City goals, General Plan Land designations, Open Space and Recreational Resource policies, and existing partnerships are all significant determining factors in the PMPU's recommendations. City Council Goals for 2015-16 are still being finalized and the General Plan Update is currently being reviewed by the Planning Commission. Open Space and Recreational Resources Policies (excerpted from City's General Plan/Conservation and Open Space Element) • Provide Appropriate Access to public land • Promote and/or sponsor recreation programs within the City • Encourage local. Public, non-profit recreational and cultural activities. • Seek County, State, Federal and private funds to acquire, improve and maintain recreational lands. • Work through the State and Federal government in support of legislation resulting in City acquisition of land. • Encourage institutions to provide public use of their recreation facilities • Encourage the building of playing fields, where appropriate, for multiple uses by various recreational groups. Citv Council Goals The City Council sets annual goals. Below are Parks and Recreation -related 2014 goals. Note: 2015 City Council and Management goals were still being determined at the time of this report. 2014 City Council Goals: • City Trails Enhancement: Complete Trails Network Plan Update (still pending) • Implementation of on-line access to recreation programs and space rentals: Complete "go -live" for Active.net (completed) • Continue with shared use of PVPUSD and City Facilities: City recreation programs to be available at Peninsula High pool and Miraleste Intermediate gym (completed - shared use at both locations scheduled for Summer 2015) • Continue with evaluation of City recreation programs/sustainability of/demand for programs (completed although staff continues to analyze the comparison of privatized rentals, independent contractors and in-house services. Staff continues to research surrounding jurisdictions to stay current on comparative services and fees) Joint Use Agreements The Recreation and Parks Department has developed a number of partnerships, ongoing relationships, and joint -use agreements with agencies that have expanded and enhanced the recreational opportunities available to City residents and visitors. Below is a partial list: Parks Master Plan Update 21 W• • Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority: Park Ranger Services and Junior Ranger Program • Los Serenos de Point Vicente: Docent and Junior Docent Program -museum tours and guided nature walks. • Youth Sports Leagues including AYSO, Little Leagues, US Youth Volleyball League, Pony League, Lacrosse, etc. • Palos Verdes Unified School District: Use of Miraleste Gym and Peninsula High School Pool • Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy: Assist with management of Palos Verdes Nature Preserve • County Lifeguards • Peninsula Seniors: Driver Safety Courses, Weekly Lecture Series, Mah Jong Classes, Bridge Classes • Portuguese Bend Nursery School: Use of elementary school site • PV Archery Club • Trump National Golf Club: Assistance with management of Founders Park rentals • Palos Verdes Library District: Toddler Reading Enrichment Programs, Pop -Up Library • YMCA: Joint Programming Opportunities • LA County Animal Care and Control Department: Pet Adoption and Pet Licensing, Vaccination and Microchip services II. PARKS and OPEN SPACE In this section, each of the City's park, recreation, and open space resources has been cataloged with acquisition information, a description of the property, the improvements that exist today, deed restrictions affecting the property, and potential recommendations. A. Parkland Standards and Current Usage 1. Parkland Standards Citv Recreational Standards When the City was incorporated in 1973, it had one municipal park, Ryan Park (formerly known as Rancho Palos Verdes Park). The City's General Plan and the City's Municipal Code (Section 16.20.100c) require four acres of parkland per thousand residents. The General Plan states that the City will "establish ordinances to require builders and developers to provide lands and/or funds for acquisition and development of land for recreational use" and that these lands and/or funds shall "be based on a standard of providing 4 acres of local parkland per 1000 population (City of Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan, page 99)." With a population of 41,643 (2010 U.S. Census), this park acreage standard yields a goal of approximately 165 acres for the City. The City's current park acreage of 278 acres (not including 1,450 acres of open space in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve) far exceeds this goal. General Plan Designations The State of California requires a Land Use Element to be included in every local government general plan. According to the State's General Plan Guidelines, the Land Use Element shall designate the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land for housing, business, industry, open space, including agriculture, natural resources, recreation, enjoyment of scenic Parks Master Plan Update 22 59 beauty, education, public buildings and grounds, solid and liquid waste disposal facilities, and other categories of public and private uses of land. The City's General Plan is currently being updated. Any changes to the General Plan that have a significant bearing or impact on the PMPU will be incorporated. Below are existing land -use designations and proposed land -use designations. Definitions of land use designations are shown below. Park Lan Use ProposedExisting Abalone Cove Shoreline R -P R-P/OSP Clovercliff R2-4 R -P Deane Dana Friendship R -P no change Del Cerro R -P no change Don C Wallace Radio Ranch R2-4 no change Eastview R R -P Founders RS1 R -P Frank A Vanderlip R51 R -P Fred Hesse Jr R -A no change Gateway Park A/H/R151 R -P Grandview R -P no change Ladera Linda (City -owned) I -E I -P Ladera Linda (School Dist -owned) I -E no change Los Verdes Golf Course R -A no change Marilyn Ryan R151 R -P Martingale R1-2 R -P Pelican Cove R -P R-P/OSP PVIC R-P/H R-P/OSP Upper Pt Vicente/Civic Center R-P/I-P R-P/1-P/OSP Lower Pt Vicente R -P R-P/OSP Shoreline Park R -P OSP Robert E Ryan R -A no change Vista Catalina R51 R -P Parks Master Plan Update 23 A Agricultural H Natural Environment/Hazard I -P Institutional public RP -OSP Open Space Preserve (new land use designation being proposed, currently does not exist) R<_1 Residential equal to or less than 1 dwelling unit per acre R1-2 Residential 1 to 2 dwelling unit per acre R2-4 Residential 2 to 4 dwelling unit per acre R -A Recreational active R -P Recreational passive R Recreational (no active or passive distinction) Below is the current 1975 General Plan Land Use Map. natural environment/hazard i= tiazard areas urban eivAr�onrnent residential !r.1 d.u./5 acres s1 d.u./acre 1-2 ft,/acre 2-4 d.u./acre 4-6 du./acre 6-12 d-u./acre 12-22 du./acre commercial retail office recreational recreational active passive =1 institutional ®educational public -- religious agricultural 0 agriculture industrial scientific research inf rastructure ; facility arterial collector control districts ® urban socia -Cultural natural specific plan ® specific plan district rancho palos verdes general plan Parks Master Plan Update 24 61 Below is the proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Map (Currently still being reviewed by the Planning Commission). Once the Planning Commission completes its review, the next step is a Public Hearing wherein the City Council would be responsible for making the final decision on any changes to the General Plan. B. Parks Inventory and Recommendations 1. Park Map 2. Park Acreage 3. Priorities 4. Recommendations 5. Abalone Cove Shoreline Park 6. Clovercliff Park 7. Del Cerro Park Parks Master Plan Update 25 62 rF_ -. u� {tilrrwnllllinmlus� SUN Land Use Designations Torrance -• - ...:'LEG UESTRIAN OVERLAY 41111F P3IOS bBTdES Estates OVERLAY DISTRICTS Rolling Hills : �`:. NATURAL DESIGN.. OC -1 ! Estal[eq - a Lomita _I SOCIO -CULTURAL. OC -2 URBAN DESIGN., OC+3 NATURAL & URBAN DESIGN, OC -1 k01 •'+ & OC -3 "Dy =AUTOMOTIVE, OC4 L._ MIRA VISTA, OC -5 •- CCjI (DRAFT) LAND USES J -,I„ RESIDENTIAL, 1-21 OPEN SPACE ® i t HAZARD 4 OF EN SPACE PRESERVE =OPEN SPACE HAZARD '-Rd ©OPEN SPACE, HILLSIDE r = ORESMENTIAL,s tDU5 ACRE _ 5 ORE ,DENTIAL, < 1 DUTACRE _ - 1 ORE MENTIAL, 1-2 DUTACRE =RESIDENTIAL, 2-4 DWACRE RESIDENTIAL 48 DUTACRE - r"' RESIDENTIAL 122 DWACE RESIDENTIAL 17-22 QU!ACRE ',may -_• - =AGRICULTURAL 141IrrrU�rU{Vi�r.r n �� �CEMETERV COMMERCIAL - RECREATIONAL ...:"-. ', aU '=. -': :`:' i. •. :::. COMMERCIAL RETAIL - OCOMMERCIAL -OFFICE • '', ° J Q INFRASTRUCTURE - FACI LnY r• Point• i y' INSTITUTIONAL -EDUCATIONAL .9cente � y �INSTITDTIQNAL-PUBLIC "- �L\ obi Q INSTITUTI©NAL- RELIGIOUS C' Long P°Pu°p. a Inspiration n' l� =RECREATIONAL -ACTIVE r' Point Point RECREATIONAL-PAS^a''iE � � c e Mllrea •s P 0.5 City of Rancho Palos Y'ertlae B. Parks Inventory and Recommendations 1. Park Map 2. Park Acreage 3. Priorities 4. Recommendations 5. Abalone Cove Shoreline Park 6. Clovercliff Park 7. Del Cerro Park Parks Master Plan Update 25 62 8. Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park 9. Eastview Park 10. Founders Park- 11. ark11. Frank A. Vanderlip Sr. Park 12. Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park 13. Grandview Park 14. Gateway Park 15. Ladera Linda Park 16. Lower Point Vicente Park 17. Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park 18. Martingale Trailhead Park 19. Pelican Point 20. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center 21. Robert E. Ryan Park 22. RPV Beach 23. Vista Catalina Park Trails and Open Space 1. Preserve Map 2. Palos Verdes Nature Preserve/PUMP 3. Trails Network Plan Update Parks Master Plan Update 26 63 Map of Rancho Palos Verdes Park Sites Parks Master Plan Update 27 iA City of RPV Park Acreage 2015 Park # of Acres Abalone Cove Shoreline Park 76.4 Clovercliff Park 0.17 Del Cerro Park 4.5 Eastview Park 9.9 Founders Park 5.5 Fred Hesse Community Park 29.4 Grandview Park 17 Ladera Linda Community Park 11 Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park 1.5 Martingale Trailhead Park 1.2 Pelican Cove 10.5 Point Vicente Interpretive Center 28 Point Vicente Park and Civic Center 71 Rancho Palos Verdes Beach 1 Robert Ryan Community Park 11 Vista Catalina Park 0.2 Frank A. Vanderlip Sr. Park 0.48 TOTAL PARK ACREAGE 278.75 Parks Master Plan Update 28 65 RECOMMENDATIONS & PRIORITIES The Parks Master Plan Update has a long list of recommendations on a site by site basis that are phased in over 1-2 years, 3-5 years, and time periods to be determined. Some of the recommendations are already budgeted for or included in the funded or unfunded Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Some smaller projects, such as improvements to general park amenities at all park sites or a shift to drought tolerant landscaping where feasible can be accommodated with existing funds within the Public Works budget. If approved, staff will pursue alternative funding, including grants for unfunded projects. These dollar figures are estimates and may change as projects are further developed and scoped. Given today's challenging economic times, the City will need to deploy its financial resources carefully and thoughtfully to address the identified needs in a cost-effective way. Priorities The following list of priorities is based on staff's interpretation of the data gathered through the process to date: 1. Complete design process/phasing for Lower Hesse Park 2. Approve Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project, outdoor exhibits and expanded/enhanced indoor improvements. 3. Address Preserve parking and neighborhood impact issues at Del Cerro and Gateway Park. 4. Confirm the desired components for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center and initiate Master Plan Process. 5. Approve a facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for development of new Ladera Linda Park Community Center 6. Transition to drought -resistant landscaping where feasible. 7. Continue to fund and implement the Citywide ADA Transition Plan. Parks Master Plan Update 29 •• PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Parks Master Plan Update 30 67 Phasing Funding 3-5 All Parks Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Improve Amenties: Benches, Ongoing/PW tables, trash/recycling (Park Budget System-wideproject) $190,000 $140,000 $190,000 na In progress X Transition to drought -tolerant Ongoing/PW landscaping when feasible (Park Budget/ System -Wide Project) $300,000 $200,000 $300,000 na In progress X Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Abalone Cove Beach Access Road Improvements $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 FY 16-17 CIP Reserve X Improve site amenities, site - appropriate signage, benches, and picnic tables. $15,000 $10,000 $15,000 no TBD X Clovercliff Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Improve Amenities: Benches, tables, trash/recycling trash/recyclingcans $5,000 $3,000 $5,000 no TBD X Del Cerro Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Incorporate results of Del Cerro Park Capacity Update Project to address parking concerns/neighborhood congestion: Est. for parking decals, striping and signage $15,500 $13,000 $15,500 no TBD X Build Public Restroom $300,000 $250,000 $300,000 Yes Unfunded X Improve Amenties: Add picnic tables and benches $15,000 $10,000 $15,000 No TBD X Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Approach HOA to consider shift to drought tolerant planting to reduce or replace the size of the existing grass field TBD na na no TBD X Eastview Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD FY 14-15 PW Build Dog Park $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 na Budget X Install fitness statons along walking paths $50,000 $35,000 $50,000 na TBD X Install staff office $200,000 $150,000 $200,000 na TBD X Install shade structures $50,000 $25,000 $50,000 na TBD X Improve Amenities: Benches, tables, trash/recylcing cans $15,000 $10,000 $15,000 na TBD X Improved/widen walking paths $30,000 $25,000 $30,000 na TBD X Founders Park I I I I I Phasing Parks Master Plan Update 30 67 Parks Master Plan Update 31 Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Continue ongoing relationship with Trump National staff to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility no cost na na na n/a ongoing Improve Amenities: Benches, tables, trash/recycling trash/recyclingcans $15,000 $10,000 $15,000 na TBD X Frank A. Vanderlip Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Improve Amenities: Benches, tables, trash/recylcing cans $10,000 $5,000 $10,000 na TBD X Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park/Upper Hesse Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Install fitness stations along walking paths $50,000 $35,000 $50,000 na TBD X Install shade structures $50,000 $25,000 $50,000 na TBD X Upgrade existing amenities: picnic tables, benches, trash/recycling trash/recycling $25,000 $20,000 $25,000 na TBD X Construct Tot Tricycle Path $30,000 $25,000 $30,000 na TBD X Resurface Parkin Lot $210,000 $210,000 $210,000 14-15 CIP Reserve X Fiber Optic Cabling Project/ includes Ryan Park $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 14-15 CIP Reserve X Energy Install solar power system $385,000 $385,000 $385,000 16-17 Savings Grant X Replace Fencing on Northern Border of Property (Upper and Lower) $169,000 $127,000 169,000 na TBD X Design and install stabilizing viewpoint at edge of western lawn. Include benches $20,000 $15,000 $20,000 na TBD X Replace current railroad tie stairs with concrete stairs (Ladera, also) $180,000 $140,000 $180,000 Unfunded TBD X Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park/Lower Hesse Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Incorporate results of Lower Hesse Park Improvement Project once completed. Phase 1 Approved Budget: Note: Scheduled to be considered by City Council in August 2015. na na na na na Phase 1 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 na na X Future Phases TBD na na na TBD X Gateway Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD ALTERNATIVE A: Approve Gateway Parking Lot Project with the following components: $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 14-15 CIP Reserve X *Dirt parking lot with included in included in included in approximately 30 parking spaces above total above total above total na na X *Several spaces large included in included in included in enough for horse trailers above total above total above total na na X Parks Master Plan Update 31 *Picnic Tables and seating included in included in included in Area above total above total above total na na X *Interpretive Information and portable kiosk, preserve/safety included in included in included in rules above total above total above total na na X *Equestrian Trailer access included in included in included in and hitching posts above total above total above total na na X included in included in included in *Emergency vehicle access above total above total above total na na X *Staff/Ranger Drop Drop-in included in included in included in Trailer portable above total above total above total na na X ALTERNATIVE B: No Facilities at included in included in included in Gateway Park above total above total above total na na na Grandview Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Pending results of environmental analysis process: Proceed with development of the "Sycamore Option" beginning with Phase 1 which would include construction of a natural parking lot, restrooms/office, play area, picnic 18-19 area and landscaping. $635,000 $635,000 $635,000 confirm CIP Reserve X Initiate Facilitated design/pubic outreach/phasing process for remaining elements of Grandview plan including activity lawn, viewing nodes, discovery area, flexible cycling area and walking trails TBD na na TBD X Ladera Linda Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Develop facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for development of new Ladera Linda 14-15 PW Park Community Center. $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 na Budget X Upon completion of Ladera Linda Master Plan Process, proceed with demolition of existing buildings and CIP Reserve construction of new community $4,00,000 in center. $7,200,000 $7,200,000 $7,200,000 18-19 18-19 reserve X Incorporate expanded Nature Center/Preserve Annex see above na na na na X Incorporate Sheriff/Ranger Drop-in Office see above na na na na X Install fitness stations $50,000 $35,000 $50,000 na TBD X Install shade structues on lower level and paddle tennis level $50,000 $25,000 $50,000 na TBD X Pave access road between lower and middle parking lots* TBD na na na TBD X Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Install two bocce ball courts adjacent to paddle tennis courts* TBD na na na TBD X Improve landscaping around existing multi -use playing field* TBD na na na TBD X Upgrade surfacing of current asphalt play area* TBD na na na TBD X Keep one basketball court* TBD na na na TBD X Parks Master Plan Update 32 Lem Add two tennis Courts" TBD na na na TBD X Add tot tricycle course* TBD na na na TBD X Install interior paddle tennis fencing separating the two courts $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 na TBD X Replace current railroad tie stairs with concrete stairs (Hesse, also)**Cost included in Hesse Park estimate ** ** ** Unfunded TBD X *Costs to be developed during Ladera Linda Parks Master Plan Process as size, scale and quantities of amenities are determined na na na na na na na na Lower Point Vicente Park/Point Vicente Interpretive Center Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Implement Lower Point Vicente Park Improvement Project once Vision Plan Update and public outreach process is complete: Incorporate Phase 3 exhibits/outdoor living history component once outreach/design process is finalized Note: Scheduled for 7/7/15 City Council Meeting $2,400,000 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 Unfunded CIP X Incorporate Phase 2 interior Exhibits upgrade into Master Plan Restricted once outreach process is complete $455,000 $455,000 $455,000 15-16 Donor Fund X Install solar power system on PVIC Energy bldg $410,000 $410,000 $410,000 17-18 Savin s Grant X Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Continue to maintain positive working relationship with Trump National to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility of park. no cost na na na n/a ongoing Martingale Trailhead Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Upgrade existing amenities including water fountain and signage $10,000 $8,000 $10,000 na TBD X Pelican Cove Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Upgrade existing amenities $50,000 $40,000 $50,000 na TBD X Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Authorize a facilitated Master Plan Design/Cost Benefit Analysis and Public Outreach Process for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center, using the Coast Vision Long Term Plan as a base document with the inclusion of a skate Park in the "new uses area" $250,000 $200,000 $250,000 na TBD X Parks Master Plan Update 33 70 Direct staff to pursue a formal "swap" of the 6.6 acre active recreation parcel with the National Park Service no cost na na na X Incorporate results of Public Works Corporation Storage Yard Relocation process to study the possibility of spreading out the storage yard to strategic locations throughout the City with a smaller central office at City Hall, thereby increasing the efficiency of Public Works operations and allow for the potential development of all or part of the existing maintenance yard. $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 na 15-16 budget X Private Fundraising by Non-profit Skate Plaza $850,000 $850,000 $850,000 Unfunded group X Civic Center Tennis Court $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 na CIP Reserve X Community Center $8,000,000 $3,000,000 $8,000,000 Unfunded X Confirm the following components be included in the Point Vicente Park Master Plan Process: u City Hall u Community Center u Skate Park/Plaza (not to exceed Cost 10,000 feet) estimates to u Outdoor Swimming Pool be developed u Shade Structures during Point u Children's Playground Vicente u Walking paths w/fitness stations Park Master u Enhanced amenities: Picnic Plan Tables, benches, trash/recycling Process as Cans/BBQs size, scale u Improved Village Green and quantities of u Tennis Courts amenities u Permanent Dog Park are identified. na na na TBD X Rancho Palos Verdes Beach Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Upgrade Park amenities $10,000 $5,000 $10,000 na TBD x Robert E. Ryan Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Remodel or build new community building. $1,000,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 na TBD X Enhanced amenities: Picnic Tables, benches, trash/recycling cans/BBQs $20,000 $15,000 $20,000 na TBD X Install shade structures $50,000 $25,000 $50,000 X Fiber optic cable to allow for unified communication with City Hall includes Hesse Park $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 14-15 CIP Reserve X Vista Catalina Park Phasing Funding 3-5 Recommendations Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost CIP/Year Source 1-2 Years years TBD Continue to work with Trump National staff to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility na na na na na ongoing Parks Master Plan Update 34 71 Est. Cost Min. Cost Max. Cost TOTALS $25,469,000 $19,171,000 $25,469,000 RJkNw PALOS VUH PAmVS1mm Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Abalone Cove Shoreline Park ADDRESS 5970 Palos Verdes Drive South PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7572-018-900 6/14/1988 7573-007-900 6/14/1988 7572-019-900 6/14/1988 7572-019-902 Archery Range 1/13/87 7572-019-901 6/14/1988 ACQUISITION COST $1,060,00 ACREAGE 124.31 total acres Ab. Cove 79.16 acres Archery 45.15 acres SOURCE OF FUNDING/ACQUISITION INFORMATION Parks Master Plan Update 35 72 The City of Rancho Palos Verdes Redevelopment Agency acquired Abalone Cove Shoreline Park from the County of Los Angeles on November 10, 1987. The property was obtained as a result of the Horan Lawsuit settlement. The Horan Agreement provided that the City would pay the County $1,060,000. Half of the payment was made to the County at the time of execution of the transfer agreement. The second payment was to be waived by the County on a dollar -for -dollar basis for each dollar diverted by the Agency for assessments securing the bonds or any other debt instruments for the stabilization work. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes Redevelopment Agency acquired the Archery Range from Transamerica Development Company (former owner of the Portuguese Bend Beach Club) on January 13, 1987 CURRENT USEMESCRIPTION Various improvements have been made to the park which includes two beaches (Abalone Cove and Sacred Cove), tide pools, bluff top viewing areas and trails. The park contains a State Ecological Preserve and taking of protected animals and marine life is prohibited. There is direct access to a parking lot. To access Sacred Cove, users must walk along Palos Verdes Drive South to one of two trails between Portuguese and Inspiration Points. The site also includes a 45 acre parcel that features an archery range. The Archery Range is 45.15 acres in size. In 1990, the City granted Conditional Use Permit No. 152 and Coastal Permit No. 84 to the South Bay Archery Club to use the property on a temporary basis as an outdoor roving archery range. This use had been displaced from its previous location on the north side of Palos Verdes Drive South when the City substantially re -graded this area as part of a landslide abatement project in 1986. The Archery Club has made minimal improvements to the property in conjunction with the CUP, including the placement of targets, warning signage, benches and small shade structures. 70.8 acres of the 79.16 acre property (excluding the upper and lower parking lots, upper picnic area and pre-school/lifeguard area) are part of the Abalone Cove Ecological Reserve. Improvements to the parking lot, building and upper area, ncluding instatllation of a parking arm were completed in 2014 as part of the Abalone Cove Parking Lot Improvements Project. The Abalone Cove Shoreline Improvements Project in 2014 included enhanced and added park pathways, viewing areas, interpretive signage, public gathering space, upgraded and additional benches and picnic tables, and a shelter. RESTRICTIONS IN - The County of Los Angeles acquired the land from private owners in 1975 for the specific purpose of providing a public beach. Federal Land and Water Conservation Funds were utilized for acquisition and development. Additionally, an Ecological Reserve was placed on a portion of the park in a license agreement with the County of Los Angeles and a lease agreement with the State Lands Commission. PRIOR RECOMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Installation of safety railing on the bluff tops above Abalone Cove and around Portuguese Point, construction of twenty picnic pads (5 handicap accessible) entry sign and landscaping, entry building with office restrooms and storage facilities, enlargement of parking lot by 70 spaces. Pave paths from the parking lot accessing the picnic tables along the bluff. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Re -sodding of the upper levels of the site with natural grasses that require no irrigation. Improving beach access by upgrading the access paths. Upgrading the lower beach area buildings, including the restrooms and outdoor shower. Parks Master Plan Update 36 73 2008 Coast Vision Plan: Minimal changes: Adding an ADA accessible trail looping the top of the bluff area, adding an overlook at the edge of the park, selective native vegetative planting, and adding shade trees. Remove invasive species. Add new park amenities -picnic tables, shade tree 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: Abalone Cove has had two significant upgrades completed in 2014, the Abalone Cove Shoreline Park Improvement Project and the Abalone Cove Parking Lot Improvement Project. Improvements included new trails, picnic areas, viewing nodes with telescopes, interpretive panels, a shade structure, native plant landscaping, and discovery zones. The public restroom, staff building and parking lot were significantly improved and an automated pay system was installed for the parking lot. f AI,lr�Y� ABALONE COVE SHORELINE PARK IMPROVEMENTS 4 f'`'•t' I•� 85'1,. OMPLM -J • Regrade and re -pave the access road from PVDS to beachfront to improve accessibility for emergency response and maintenance vehicles. • Improve site amenities, site -appropriated signage, benches, and picnic tables. Parks Master Plan Update 37 74 Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET Z CM 1W RAN= PAM VRM P A WPM PROPERTY NAME Clovercliff Park ADDRESS 28801 Golden Meadow Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7583-001-900 6/5/1978 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE .18 SOURCE OF FUNDING Donated to the City. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This park land was donated by Mr. and Mrs. Czeslaw Mackiewicz and Mr. and Mrs. James Gehris. The park improvements were constructed and dedicated in 1983. The 7718 square foot pocket park has a path, is landscaped, and large rocks are available for seating with a distant ocean view. RESTRICTIONS The land was donated under the condition that it be used as a view park only. No playground equipment, barbeque equipment or picnic tables can be installed. PRIOR RECOMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: No recommended changes. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Encourage the City of Palos Verdes Estates to preserve the land abutting this park as open space to provide access between the two communities and protect the existing view. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: • T Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping • Improve walking path, site -appropriate signage, and benches. Parks Master Plan Update 38 75 s Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET RANCHO W(15 WIND[$ Piliiks 5YM M PROPERTY NAME Del Cerro Park ADDRESS 2 Park Place PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7581-032-901 9/27/1978 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 3.94 SOURCE OF FUNDING Construction costs were $39,000 and were funded through the Quimby Act assessments for the tract. In 2002, the city acquired the open space parcel surrounding this park site through a County tax -defaulted property auction. The cost of the additional parcel was $18,215.61 and was paid for with City General Funds. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This property was acquired from the Federal government at the same time the City acquired Point Vicente Park and the Civic Center. The property was acquired by the City at a 100 percent discount. The parcel formerly supported a radar installation that was abandoned at about the same time the City incorporated. The existing park was completed in 1983 in conjunction with the development of the Park Place Tract. Construction costs were funded through the Quimby Act assessments for the tract. There are panoramic views of canyons, agriculture, coastal headlands, ocean and offshore islands from the site, and a flat grass play area. It is landscaped and has a safety fence just below the bluff to restrict access to the canyon below without blocking the views. The site also has low lying stone donor appreciation walls installed by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy. There is a public parking lot, but no restrooms. Non - motorized model remote control airplanes are allowed to be flown at this park site by permit. RESTRICTIONS The park must remain open for public use in perpetuity for recreation purposes. The park may not be fenced, sold or leased except to another governmental agency with the concurrence of the Department of the Interior. Amenities were constructed under the approved Program of Utilization. Any additional amenities must follow that Program of Utilization or be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Parks and Recreation. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS Parks Master Plan Update 39 76 1989 Parks Master Plan: Safety fencing just below the bluff to restrict access to the canyon below without blocking the view. Permanent restroom facility. Tot lot and play equipment. Pedestrian trail connecting the bluff with the parking lot. 5-10 picnic tables near the grove of trees near bluff -top area. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Restrooms, picnic tables, tot lot and play equipment. BBQs, benches, water fountains, trailhead markers, consider public access connections between Del Cerro Park and the Portuguese Bend Nature Preserve. Consider amending Municipal Code to allow hang gliding and parasailing, subject to City permitting process. No additional lighting. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: • Establish Del Cerro Park as a donor recognition site • Augment visitor facilities and provide ADA accessible path to Preserve outlook • Improve Preserve and Trails signage. • Build restroom. 12015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Note: In April 2015 the City Council directed staff to study parking and access options in the Del Cerro Park area. There have been numerous reports of people parking in neighborhoods adjacent to the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve area. This item was addressed by the City Council on June 16, 2015. Attendees expressed resistance to parking meters but were more receptive to red -striping the landward side of Crenshaw Boulevard, permit parking in adjacent neighborhoods, and the possibility of designating parking spaces at Del Cerro Park for resident -only use. This matter will be incorporated into the PMPU when finalized. Recommendations: • Implement the Del Cerro Park Capacity Update Project to address parking concerns/neighborhood congestion and improve Preserve access • Install restroom building • Install additional picnic tables and benches • Shift to drought tolerant landscaping A. r Parks Master Plan Update 40 77 Mm FA105 VIRUS PAEli3 Jn3 (M Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park PROPERTY NAME Don C. Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Park ADDRESS Armarga Springs Rd. and Pergola PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7585-033-900 2/15/1990 7585-033-904 2/15/1990 7585-033-901 2/15/1990 7585-033-905 2/15/1990 7585-033-902 2/15/1990 7585-033-903 2/15/1990 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE .69 SOURCE OF FUNDING This property was received in satisfaction of the conditions of the Quimby Act upon development of the Wallace Tract. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION The property was originally intended as a radio museum with funds for the improvement of the museum to be raised by the Wallace Radio Ranch Museum Foundation. When the required funds were not raised the property became a neighborhood park maintained by the Wallace Ranch Homeowners Association. There are no improvements to the property other than turf and an irrigation system. The property has been maintained for many years by the adjacent homeowners association and is considered, by them, to be a private open space. RESTRICTIONS PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Consider approaching Wallace Ranch HOA to determine level of interest in accommodating a practice field for soccer, football or lacrosse. Consider modifying fencing to provide access points from Amarga Springs Road and/or provide park signage indicating that the site is a public park. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Parks Master Plan Update 41 • • Approach HOA to consider a shift to drought tolerant planting to replace or reduce the size of the existing grass field. Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Eastview Park ADDRESS 1700 Westmont Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7444-001-900 1989 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 9.9 SOURCE OF FUNDING Site is leased by the City. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This park site is leased from Los Angeles County Sanitation District. Improvements on this site include a children's playground, picnic facilities, jogging path, permanent restroom, landscaping and an off-street parking lot. RESTRICTIONS T The lease with the Sanitation District precludes adoption of any rules that would limit the use of the park to Rancho Palos Verdes residents and allows for termination of the lease 60 -day notice from the District should the land be needed for Sanitation District use. The City may be required to remove the improvements at the discretion of the District if the land is taken back. Passive Use Designation. Parks Master Plan Update 42 79 PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Children's Playground, permanent restroom, jogging path, picnic facilities, landscaping and irrigation, off-street parking lot (note: Park constructed after Master Plan adopted) 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Possible consideration as sports field location, ideally one that would not require the installation of permanent facilities. Expand the parking lot and add BBQs. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Dog Park: Off -leash dogs are a common occurrence at Eastview, which has a reputation as being essentially an off -leash facility. A leash law is in effect at all City Parks. Staff has received numerous complaints about residents who feel uneasy or have had unpleasant encounters with off -leash dog. A dog park would not eliminate this issue, but it would be part of the solution, providing an opportunity for dog owners to legally have their dogs off - leash. Public workshops elicited concerns about the project and significant oppostion, although the online survey had strong support. The Eastview Dog Park would have both small and large dog runs. The proposed location currently has ample, existing shade trees and would have seating areas, access to water, public restrooms, and sufficient parking. The location is buffered from commercial buildings to the west, is compatible with the land use designation and has approval from the Sanitation District. The park will be unstaffed and have fixed hours of operation consistent with the parks current hours. Staff will utilize existing, approved rule signage from the Rancho Caninos Dog Park. • Build Dog Park • Install fitness stations along walking paths • Install staff office • Install shade structures • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans • Improve/Widen Walking Paths • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping Parks Master Plan Update 43 Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET RANCHO PAM WADES PARKS SYSra M PROPERTY NAME Founders Park ADDRESS 1 Ocean Trails Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7564-021-909 2/8/2006 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 5.21 SOURCE OF FUNDING N/A CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This park site was deeded to the City by the V.H. Property Corporation as part of the golf course development agreement. The site is adjacent to the Trump National Golf Course Improvements include picnic tables, a gazebo, nearby restrooms, coastal access, walking and biking trails and landscaping. This park, which is dedicated to the courageous visionaries who helped found the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, has tremendous views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina Island. A portion of the site can be reserved for weddings and other ceremonial events. Trump National Golf Course is responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the park as well as handling reservations for rentals which, as of September 2014, are limited to 15 person stand-up ceremonies. The flagpole at Trump National was recently added to Founders Park. RESTRICTIONS There is a condition on the property regarding special events. The park can have up to six temporary events per year within the park including, without limitation, filming events that close off portions of the park. Limited to recreation and open space uses. PRIOR RECCOMENDATIONS Parks Master Plan Update 44 F�• 1989 Parks Master Plan: N/A 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: N/A 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 12015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Continue ongoing relationship with Trump National staff to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility of park. • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET CMI' OF UK" PAMVBN$ PANS SYSTEM PROPERTY NAME Frank A. Vanderlip Sr. Park ADDRESS 6500 Seacove Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7573-016-900 1/8/1982 7573-016-901 1/8/1982 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 4.77 SOURCE OF FUNDING This park site was deeded to the City in satisfaction of conditions of development of the T&T tract CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION Parks Master Plan Update 45 This park site was deeded to the City in satisfaction of conditions of development of the T&T tract. The park improvements were provided under the Quimby Act requirements, and the park was accepted as complete by the City in 1986 as a prerequisite for the development of the Seacove area. A bluff -top safety railing was later added by the City. Other improvements include benches, a safety fence and landscaping. Unobstructed views of the ocean, headlands and islands are the main attraction at this park. RESTRICTIONS i Proceeds from any sale of park property must be returned to the Quimby fund for future purchase of park land or development of park amenities. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Install safety railing at the bluff edge and provide trail access. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: None 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping. • Improve amenities: benches, tables, trash/recycling cans Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME JW Fred Hesse Jr. Community Park ADDRESS 29301 Hawthorne Blvd. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7583-022-908 4/3/1980 7583-022-910 5/27/1976 7583-022-911 5/27/1976 7583-022-909 4/3/1980 ACQUISITION COST $1,520,000 ACREAGE 28.68 SOURCE OF FUNDING _ Parks Master Plan Update 46 LOOK• Construction of the facility used the following funding sources: Quimby Act, Proposition 1, Environmental Excise Tax (EET), General Revenue Sharing, Capital Improvement Fund, Parks and Recreation Fund, Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund. To develop the Lower Hesse Park Trails, the following funding sources were used: Measure A, State Parks and Recreation Grant, Quimby and EET funds. The acquisition of the parks was combined with the purchase of two parcels that make up Grandview Park. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION The park site was acquired from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District. The purchase was completed in two transactions over a five-year period beginning in 1976. Development of the facility was completed in September 1983 at a cost of $3,715,405. This park, with its well -manicured parkland and active community center, is one of the most popular in the City. Among the features available for public enjoyment in the upper park area are baseball and soccer fields, numerous picnic tables with barbecues, playground equipment suitable for toddlers to adolescents, and a well-used'/4 mile walking path. Most of the City's privatized recreation classes are offered at this facility and many Peninsula Senior activities are held here. Additionally three rooms in the 7,300 square foot community center are available for rental for meetings and private parties. In lower Hesse Park, a system of trails, two picnic areas, sand volleyball court, and a parking lot were completed in July 1999. Funds for the $497,800 improvement project came from: Measure A $210,000 State Parks and Recreation Grant $147,750 Quimby/EET Funds $140,050 RESTRICTIONS None, however, use of various grant, Quimby, and EET funding for construction carries various restrictions. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Lower Hesse Park -Construct four to eight regulation tennis courts, permanent restrooms and parking. The remainder of the area is to be landscaped as a passive, open greenbelt. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Upper Hesse Park: Upgrading the existing ball field to a league standard playing field. Create a dual track around the perimeter of the park for biking, rollerblading and skateboarding. Lower Hesse Park: Development of softball and/or soccer fields, however neighborhood opposition to this idea would be significant. Consider improvements including picnic tables, restrooms, barbeques, and paved bike trails. Recommended the City should make a decision on whether it should remain devoted to passive uses or be converted to a combination of passive and active uses. Once that decision is made, the City could go through a facilitated design process to develop a plan to improve Lower Hesse Park as either a passive use facility with better landscaping and irrigation, or a combination active use facility with athletic fields surrounded by passive use improvements. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Parks Master Plan Update 47 Upper Hesse Park • Install fitness stations along walking path • Install shade structures • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping • Upgrade existing amenities: picnic tables/benches/trash/recycling cans • Improve/Enhance viewpoints • Construct tricycle path for tots • Resurface Parking Lot • Fiber optic cabling allowing for unified communication with City Hall • Install solar power system • Replace fencing on northern border of property • Design and install and stabilizing view point at the edge of western lawn in Upper Hesse. Include benches etc. • Replace current railroad tie stairs with concrete stairs. • Incorporate results of Lower Hesse Park Improvement Project once completed. Lower Hesse Park: Note: Improvements to this area have been in a planning/design phase since 2005. Conceptual designs were prepared in 2011 which included extensive landscape and trail improvements and active elements such as a basketball court, tennis court, paved parking lot, and a small structure which would include a public restroom, staff office and storage. The City Council directed staff in 2012 to work with the Pacific View HOA to scale back the project and phase in improvements. A draft plan is being prepared for the site with phases including an initial phase funded at $500,000. Note: Scheduled to be presented to the City Council in August 2015. Parks Master Plan Update 48 F'R• F4:"'"l cwrr DF RAIN ala PAM Y[RDE1 PROPERTY NAME Gateway Park ADDRESS Palos Verdes Dr. South btwn Peppertree Drive and Schooner Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 2005 ACQUISITION COST See below ACREAGE 17 acres SOURCE OF FUNDING Gateway Park was purchased in December 2005 together with 406.95 additional acres that are now part of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The total cost for the 423.95 acres was $17,074,057. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION This 17 -acre park site open space is surrounded on three sides by the Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve. It is located between Peppertree Drive and Schooner Drive on the landward side or Portuguese Bend Drive South. It is located within an active landslide, on land that is currently stable. This area contains outstanding habitat and is heavily used by hikers, mountain bikers, and equestrians. There are no current improvements on site. RESTRICTIONS/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 9.3 acres of this property will be included in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve and is encumbered with a Conservation Easement. Parks Master Plan Update 49 We Yf{ -: Gateway Pakrk_:. Proposed Gateway Layout PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: NA 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Recommended that a portion of proposed Portuguese Bend site commonly referred to as the Sandbox be kept out of the proposed Preserve property and utilized as an Equestrian Park. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: The Coast Vision Plan identified the park area to be the future home of an equestrian center with riding rings and public parking that would also serve as a trailhead to the Preserve. None of the proposed improvements would consist of permanent structures because of the active land movement in the area. The equestrian center improvements were envisioned to be sponsored by the local equestrian community. To date, no formal request to construct the improvements from the equestrian community has been received by the City. Parks Master Plan Update 50 F�• Gateway Park Concept Plan 3 'l/z 9 � Id nen // �' -- J omone eahetlGartl 3 ISI '® Irak 9 a � 1'1 11 2008 Coastal Vision Plan Gateway Park Conceputal Design 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS and ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background Information When the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve was first created in 2004, an approximately 25 -acre portion was set aside at the southern tip of the Portuguese Bend Reserve to be used as an Active Recreation Area (ARA). Subsequently, in 2008, the City Council adopted Coast Vision Plan, which identified the area, now known as Gateway Park, to be the future home of an equestrian center with riding rings and public parking that would also serve as a trailhead to the Preserve. None of the proposed improvements would consist of permanent structures because of the active land movement in the area. The equestrian center improvements were envisioned to be sponsored by the local equestrian community. To date, no formal request to construct the improvements from the equestrian community has been received by the City. On April 1, 2014, the City Council reconfigured and reduced the size of Gateway Park from 25 - acres to 18 -acres. At this same meeting, the Council also removed the 40 -acre Archery Range property located on the opposite side of Palos Verdes Drive South from the Preserve. The Management Agreement with the Palos Verdes Land Conservancy was amended to reflect these changes. Subsequently, staff prepared a conceptual plan for Gateway Park to serve as the main parking area and southern "gateway" to the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The concept was developed in part to relieve some of the parking and congestion problems that have developed on Crenshaw Boulevard and the area around Del Cerro Park. The concept plan was presented to the community through the PMPU process and consists of the following elements: • Dirt access road and parking lot with approximately 30 parking spaces, including several spaces large enough for horse trailers • Picnic tables and seating areas • Hitching posts • Staff/Ranger drop-in trailer (portable) • Public restrooms (portable) Parks Master Plan Update 51 • Interpretive and educational information on portable kiosks • Emergency vehicle access Gateway Park would be a staffed park site, and staff would further educate the public on the rules of the Preserve. Because Gateway Park sits within an active landslide, all improvements would be temporary and mobile. Public Input: Numerous strong concerns were expressed during the PMPU public outreach process regarding this proposal including safety, security, and the area's fragile geology. Residents expressed concerns that visitors would park at Gateway Park and then cross Palos Verdes Drive South to access the beaches and coves. Many residents referenced a tragedy that occurred on July 4th, 2014 where an individual drowned and numerous rescues were necessary due to high surf conditions. Social media and increased public awareness of sites such as Abalone Cove and the Nature Preserve were also identified as concerns. As Gateway Park was by far the most controversial topic addressed during the public outreach process, staff is seeking particular direction from the City Council on how it should be addressed in the Park Master Plan Update. To that end, staff offers the following points to consider: • The City's geologist has examined the proposed location and determined that it is appropriate for the proposed uses, none of which are permanent and can be moved as needed. • Safety is a paramount concern, so the site will be staffed when open to direct visitors towards the Preserve. • Signage would be installed to inform visitors of potentially dangerous surf conditions and that the lot is intended for Preserve visitors, not beachgoers. • The parking lot is located as far away from PV Drive South as possible to discourage beach access. • An Abalone Cove Safety Task Force has been formed to address dangerous surf conditions and has established safety protocols. • Staff acknowledges that people may ignore all the safeguards listed above and put themselves in danger. Oceans are dangerous and will continue to be so despite all best efforts. There are already a number of parking lots that allow for beach access in Rancho Palos Verdes. • The City currently has no designated parking spots for the Portuguese Bend Nature Preserve. Gateway Park was removed from the Preserve at the time of its acquisition in order to help address this issue. • The Portuguese Bend Nature Reserve and the entire Palos Verdes Nature Preserve are a source of tremendous pride for the City. The majority of City residents cannot access this area by foot. Allowing for a modest parking lot at the southern end of the Portuguese Bend Nature Preserve will allow visitors, both resident and non-resident alike, to access this community jewel. Alternative A: Construct dirt access road and parking lot with approximately 30 parking spaces including several spaces large enough for horse trailers, seating areas, a small staff building, restrooms, and interpretive and educational information on the Preserve. Gateway Park would serve as the main parking area and southern "gateway" to the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, and provide information to encourage proper use of the Preserve, and educate the public on the Parks Master Plan Update 52 delicate resources. The park would be staffed, and staff would further educate the public on the rules of the Preserve. Because Gateway Park sits within an active landslide, all improvements should be temporary and mobile. Components: • Dirt parking lot with approximately 30 parking spaces • Several spaces large enough for horse trailers • Picnic Tables and seating Area • Interpretive Information and portable kiosk, preserve/safety rules • Equestrian Trailer access and hitching posts • Emergency vehicle access • Staff/Ranger Drop Drop-in Trailer (portable) Alternative B: No parking lot or facilities/amenities at Gateway Park X. an of tMOMPI AMMMe PROPERTY NAME Grandview Park ADDRESS 6000 Ironwood St. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7546-026-901 3/20/1981 7546-026-902 5/17/1976 7546-026-903 3/14/1979 ACQUISITION COST $469,286 ACREAGE 17.54 SOURCE OF FUNDING low— This property was acquired in three parcels. Two were purchased from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District at a cost of $434,286, and one from the Norfolk Machine Company for $35,000. The funds for the purchase were probably from the Capital Improvement Parks Master Plan Update 53 all Fund. The Norfolk Machine Company parcel provided access to the site from Monternalaga Drive. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION T This park site was acquired in three parcels. Two were purchased from the Palos Verdes peninsula Unified School District, and the third was purchased from the Norfolk Machine Company which provided access to the site from Montemalaga Drive. This was once known as the Highland site (PVPUSD). Purchased in conjunction with the Hesse Park parcels. In the agreement with the school district, the City agreed to pay $380,000 per year to the school district, over a five year period beginning on March 15, 1976. This amounted to $1,520,000 over the five year period. In return, the City acquired the seven parcels of land. Five parcels known as the Crestmont site became part of Hesse Park and the Highland site. There have been no improvements made to the property. RESTRICTIONS j Grandview Park, since it was obtained from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School, District cannot be sold with a public vote. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Install a parking lot and provide for vehicular and pedestrian access. Improve into a cultivated, passive open space with a small tot lot, restrooms and five to ten picnic sites (tables and pads) in the bowl below the plateau. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Suggested small soccer fields and restrooms on the flat areas. Trail access, bike trails, and skateboard facilities should be considered. Although significant grading would be required and access, parking, and neighborhood opposition would have to be considered, this site has the most potential for athletic fields of all City -owned properties. Recommended that the canyon areas on the east and west edges of the site, with a strip along the northern edge of the park to connect the two canyons, be preserved within the NCCP. Engage in public process that would engage recreational user groups and neighborhood residents. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Grandview Park offers a large opportunity for development and meeting community recreational needs since it is 18 acres of completely undeveloped parkland. However, because of the site's challenging topography and that it is undeveloped, substantial grading and installation of utilities will be required and will add to the cost of developing the site. In 2010, City Council approved a conceptual plan for Grandview Park, including improved access, amenities, and recreational elements. At the time of this Parks Master Plan Update, the conceptual plans were undergoing the Mitigated Negative Declaration environmental analysis. • Recommendation: Dependent on the results on the environmental analysis process, proceed with the "Sycamore Option" beginning with Phase 1 which would include construction of a natural parking lot, restrooms/office, play area, picnic area, and landscaping. • Initiate Facilitated design/pubic outreach/phasing process for remaining elements of Grandview plan including activity lawn, viewing nodes, discovery area, flexible cycling area and walking trails Parks Master Plan Update 54 91 Parks Master Plan Update 55 W + �4 61 "Ilz W jk,.'-.' ... N. 95 Sr. elk Parks Master Plan Update 55 W Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Ladera Linda ADDRESS 32201 Forrestal Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7564-001-905 9/27/1989 7564-001-911 5/4/1984 7564-001-906 9/27/1989 7564-001-912 8/31/1981 7564-001-908 5/4/1984 7564-001-913 5/4/1984 7564-001-910 9/27/1989 ACQUISITION COST $974,400 ACREAGE 11.21 SOURCE OF FUNDING Funding for acquisition costs were from the Capital Improvement Fund for Payment made in Years 1983- 1986. It is uncertain which funding source was utilized for payments prior to that time. Probable funding sources were Quimby Act, EET, and possibly Federal Revenue Sharing. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION The City purchased the former Ladera Linda Elementary School from the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District. Multiple parcels were purchased over an eight year period beginning in 1981 The former elementary school site's amenities include a parking lot, restrooms, paddle tennis courts, tot lot, playground, basketball court, soccer and softball fields. Ladera Linda is also home to the Discovery Room which features live and static exhibits of local flora, fauna and historic information. Staff and volunteers provide educational programs on-site for a large variety of school, youth and other groups as well as conduct docent -led hikes in the surrounding hills and Forrestal Property. This location also has a multipurpose room and classroom available for rent for meetings and private parties. There are excellent views of the cliff face, hillsides, coastline and ocean. Once of the classrooms was recently established as a Discovery Room that features static displays about the Peninsula's geology, flora and fauna. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2013 Infrastructure Report Card prepared by SA Associates, an engineering firm hired to assess the current condition of existing public structures in the City. The Ladera Linda Community Center received an overall infrastructure score of "F" (FAIL). This rating is given to those building that are in very poor condition. The infrastructure report card utilizes grading criterion that the general public can relate to, similar to the grading used in education. It is the same criterion used by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in infrastructure grading. RESTRICTIONS Parks Master Plan Update 56 93 There are no deed restrictions for this property. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Improve the middle and upper parking lots as needed. Regrade and pave the access road between the lower and middle parking lots. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Consider demolition of buildings for athletic fields or new community park. Consider extensive remodeling of existing buildings and improving parking facilities. Recommended detailed cost -benefit analysis of options. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Development of New Community Center • Develop facilitated Master Plan and public outreach process for development of new Ladera Linda Park Community Center. • Incorporate expanded Nature Center/Preserve Annex and Sheriff/Ranger drop-in office into Master Plan Process • Upon completion of Master Plan Process, proceed with demolition of existing buildings and construction of new Community Center Additional Enhancements: Recommendations below should be done in conjunction with Community Center development • Install fitness stations • Install shade structures on lower level and paddle tennis level • Pave access road between lower and middle parking lots • Install two bocce ball courts adjacent to paddle tennis courts • Improve landscaping on existing multi -use playing field • Upgrade surfacing of current asphalt play area: keep two basketball courts, add one tennis court. • Add tot tricycle course • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible • Install interior paddle tennis fencing separating the two courts. Note: Local Ladera Linda Residents conducted an informal neighborhood survey. The results can be found in Appendix G. Parks Master Plan Update 57 PROPERTY NAME Lower Point Vicente Park/Point Vicente Interpretive Center ADDRESS 31501 Palos Verdes Drive West PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7573-002-904 7/23/2004 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 27.5 SOURCE OF FUNDING Land was acquired by the County from the Federal Government in 1978. The City entered into a 50 -year joint powers agreement with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors (at no annual rental fee) on July 17, 1979. The agreement provided that the City develop and operate the facility under the conditions provided in the approved Program of Utilization prepared by the County and amended by the City. The Point Vicente Interpretive Center opened in 1984, and was expanded in 2006. Development costs were funded by the following sources: SB 174 Urban Open Space and Recreation Grant, State, Urban and Coastal Bond Act of 1976, Federal land and Water Conservation Fund and the City Recreation Department Development Fund. The County deeded this property to the City in May 2004. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION Lower Point Vicente is zoned Open Space Recreation, and is identified for passive recreation in the City's General Plan. The site includes the City's Point Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC), at 10,000 square feet of developed building area, and 13,000 square feet of hard-scaped plazas and outdoor amphitheater area. PVIC is focused on the coastal setting, marine life and history of the Peninsula, and is a center for community functions. A pathway along the bluff edge of the site connects into the Ocean Front Estates bluff front trail system. The site is a popular destination for whale watching, picnics, weddings, and rentals. It is also the site of the annual Whale of a Day community event. Point Vicente Interpretive Center opened in 1984 with a mission to present and interpret the unique features and history of the Palos Verdes Peninsula. It offers educational and recreational opportunities along with dramatic coastline vistas. Its location provides spectacular opportunities to view the annual migration of the Pacific gray whale from December through April. The Interpretive Center features exhibits about the area and members of Los Serenos de Point Vicente, the Center's volunteer docent organization, lead tours of the Center and nearby paths and trails. This beautiful park, on the cliffs adjacent to the Point Vicente Lighthouse, is the only location in the City where an outdoor wedding and reception (permit required) may be held. Picnic tables are available, however fires and barbecues are prohibited at this site. Onsite trails connecton the Northside of the property to the adjacent trail system at Ocean Front Estates. RESTRICTIONSIADDITIONAL INFORMATION Subject to Federal Program of Utilization. Excavation cannot occur in areas capped for lead remediation. Parks Master Plan Update 58 95 PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Develop an educational center, add interpretive signage, obtain an agreement with U.S. Coast Guard station for access to the lighthouse to conduct docent -led tours. Build a golf course on the grounds of Point Vicente Park/Civic Center and PVIC. 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Pursue the completion of PVIC expansion project and reopen the park fully to the public. Provide a trail connection between the PVIC property and the bluff top trail at Oceanfront Estates. Pursue grant funding for "Outdoor History Museum". 2008 Coast Vision Plan: Development of Outdoor History Museum/PVIC Phase III, expanded parking and access. Determine a broad site design and program possibilities for publicly accessible space at the adjacent Point Vicente Lighthouse property should the City obtain permission to this land via the Coast Guard, and a Complentary Education Public Use Facility, focusing on the role of companion animals and the unique story of animal life on the Peninsula. In August 2011, the Annenberg Foundation formally withdrew their development application for Lower Point Vicente. Since that time, the Council adopted Vision Plan for Lower Point Vicente continued to show the Annenberg facility as a future project for this property. In order to update the Vision Plan document to remove the Annenberg Foundation's project from Lower Point Vicente given the withdrawal of the project, the Council directed Staff to place such an item on a future Council agenda. At its November 20, 2012 meeting, the Council amended the Vision Plan by removing the Annenberg Foundation's proposal and substituting it with a public green area. The Council also directed Staff to initiate a public outreach process to develop an updated plan for Lower Point Vicente (the Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project) that would eventually be incorporated into the Council adopted Vision Plan. Note: An amended site plan for Lower Point Vicente is scheduled to be considered by the City Council at the July 7, 2016 City Council Meeting. The amended site plan for Lower Point Vicente was developed based on public input gathered during the February 5 and March 25, 2015 workshops and is intended to replace the current site plan in the Council -adopted Coast Vision Plan. 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS The Lower Point Vicente Park Improvement Project is still in progress at the time of the Parks Master Plan's consideration/adoption. The results of that process, which focuses site improvements including new decomposed granite trails, reconfigured and new parking spaces, drainage facilities, landscaping, fencing, signage, and grading, as well as exterior exhibits at PVIC (Phase 3) will be incorporated into the Master Plan once finalized and approved. The outdoor exhibit elements being considered include the following elements: 1. Parking Lot/Bioswale 2. Grassland/Play Area 3. Tongva Village 4. Geology/Fossil Dig 5. Dry Farming 6. WW II History 7. Overlook area 8. Wall of Honor A planning/design effort was also underway at the time of the Master Plan's submission for indoor exhibits (Completion of Phase II) which will upgrade, enhance, and unify the museum's current exhibits. Staff and members of Los Serenos de Point Vicente Docents are currently working with an exhibit designer and seeking grant funding for the projects. The results of that process are recommended to be incorporated into the Master Plan once the initial design is finalized and approved. Parks Master Plan Update 59 •e Recommendations • Implement Lower Point Vicente Improvement Project (once approved) to include: new decomposed granite trails, overlooks, reconfigured and new parking spaces (including new upper terrace parking lot), drainage facilities (including a bioswale), landscaping, fencing, way finding signs and minor site grading to accommodate the improvements, Phase 3 exhibits living history exhibit process, authorize staff to look for funding sources. • Incorporate Phase 2 Interior Exhibit Update into Master Plan once process is complete and approved by Council. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible • Install Solar Power System on the Point Vicente Interpretive Center building �5 150 tF PJaIiVc Plant Lo y'r ��?Fuel?.+odiRc7�€c•n"corn - � •'_. � J MY: el l f , 9. Paird Wicen".e �n°erprel ae � � rJ �eraiee 2. Pnrlong Lot oath Bioswol, 2. Cxo 10nd A. Tongue ULIFoge ' .} •r'yY\t i S. Gtalogy! Fv,J 2 x.5 �r ! d. A—haeologacal Dg _ ° } 7. 3parkh Rancho B. Dry Funning X12 r 4 �I L;u• �J6 I 4. WWII li tacy and ReOroam I0_ 0u books 11. Wal[&H� 12 Picnic A-- tf. be plocadill—ghoul -----Mam Trot tkrwrork -- Siecc.:,drxy Tm6'. *EEO& 51opmc& and Adpce t Flabirot Buffer -- ,Piuperly Li - 24 It i-2It Recommended separation beiweeR bails and prop ly line= 150 ti rrir.. a roar tw aw• Parks Master Plan Update 60 97 ifCITY1} RAN .F liliCN4 PALCIS YEAaES PARKS M7917 PROPERTY NAME Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park ADDRESS 1 Ocean Trails Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7564-021-019* 5/23/2011 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE 1.5 SOURCE OF FUNDING Deeded to the City by the Trump National Golf Course as part of the golf course development agreement. Officially acquired on May 23, 2011. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION Passive park with tremendous views of Trump National Golf Course and Pacific Ocean. Site features picnic tables, benches, a water fountain, a dolphin statue and a bridge named in honor of LAPD Swat Officer Randall Simmons who was killed in the line of duty. The park is named for the original Mayor of Rancho Palos Verdes. Property is maintained by Trump National Golf Course. RESTRICTIONS Use must be consistent with approvals of overall project. There is a condition on the property regarding special events. The park can have up to six temporary events per year within the park including, without limitation, filming events that close off portions of the park. PRIOR RECOMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: N/A 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: N/A 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None Parks Master Plan Update 61 • 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible Continue to maintain positive working relationship with Trump National to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility of park. r mad +( S { y� 1 . F arr 0# ` "NOO-PALOSYMM PUK TM Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Martingale Trailhead Park ADDRESS 22 Martingale Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7568-007-900 211411978 ACQUISITION COST $46,392 ACREAGE .98 SOURCE OF FUNDING _ Unktlown CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION z This parcel was designated for construction as a trailhead park and to establish easements for a fifteen foot wide equestrian trail that traverses this parcel as well as Lots 20 and 21 of the same tract. Park improvements were completed and the park was dedicated in 1990. The site is located in an Equestrian Overlay District. The trailhead provides access to a trails system serving the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills and Rolling Hills Estates. Both hikers and equestrians utilize this park. Improvements include landscaping, a tri -level drinking fountain which serves horses, humans and small animals, a mounting block, and a seating rock. RESTRICTIONS There are no deed restrictions for this property. Parks Master Plan Update 62 •• PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Improve maintenance or replace existing California peppertree with a more appropriate species or remove. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Upgrade existing amenities including water fountain and signage. Parks Master Plan Update 63 CI PROPERTY NAME Pelican Cove (formerly Point Vicente Fishing Access) ADDRESS 31300 Palos Verdes Dr. West PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7573-002-902 712312004 ACQUISITION COST ACREAGE 10.53 SOURCE OF FUNDING 1" 1 The City acquired this property from Los Angeles County through a grant deed in 2004. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION ' This site features a paved parking lot, restroom building, improved trail to the shoreline, and incredible Catalina and ocean view. Native plantings surround the parking lot which links to the public parking lot at Terranea and the adjacent coastal trail system. The parking lot, restroom building, and the landscaping is maintained by the Terranea Resort pursuant to the Council - adopted Terranea Maintenance Agreement. Name changed to Pelican Cove in 2011. RESTRICTIONS 9.3 acres of this property will be included in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve and is encumbered with a Conservation Easement. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Noted that developer of current Terranea Property is required to expand this park by 2.2 acres, improve the fence and public restrooms, increase the size of the existing off-street parking lot by 50 spaces, and maintain all improvements. This park will provide a connection to the bluff top trail network that will be built in conjunction with the development of the resort. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None Parks Master Plan Update 64 101 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Upgrade existing amenities. nor of Ri4WN PALOS VINDIS PARRS SYSTEM Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET PROPERTY NAME Point Vicente Park and Civic Center ADDRESS 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7573-002-908 3/6/1979 7573-002-912 6/7/1985 7573-002-909 9/27/1978 7573-002-913 6/5/1987 ACQUISITION COST $950,000 ACREAGE 73.35 SOURCE OF FUNDING $450,000 land $500,000 building (Capital funding, see Resolution 87-19) DESCRIPTION 65.12 acres of land for this park was acquired from the Federal Government after its use as a NIKE Missile Base was closed and it was declared surplus by the General Services Administration(GSA). The 8.23 acres designated Civic Center was purchased from GSA in two parcels. The park site surrounds the City's Civic Center and includes open grassy areas, a sand volleyball court, tennis court, "Rancho Caninos" a temporary dog park, and a spectacular view of the ocean. This is the site of the City's annual July 4th Independence Day Celebration. 65.12 acres of the property is part of the Alta Vicente Nature Preserve. By permit, model helicopters are allowed to be flown at this park site in a designated area surrounding a helicopter pad located near the maintenance yard. The U.S. Coast Guard also owns a 3.93 acre parcel located on the west promontory overlooking the Point Vicente Lighthouse, which is the site of several communications towers and an abandoned WWII -era artillery bunker. RESTRICTIONS/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/CURRENT USE Parks Master Plan Update 65 .M Background Information The size of the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center property, combined with its tremendous ocean views, few nearby neighbors and location adjacent to City Hall, has made it a focal point for potential development plans and site improvements throughout the City's history. The property, which boasts spectacular coastal and ocean views, is a tremendous resource that could potentially accommodate a number of civic, recreation, and cultural needs for the community. The property consists of three components: Point Vicente Park The 65.12 acres of park land that was acquired from the Federal Government after its use as a NIKE Missile Base was closed and the property was declared surplus by the General Services Administration (GSA). The majority of the park is part of the Alta Vicente Nature Reserve, which is part of the larger 1,450 -acre Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, and has been set aside for habitat preservation under the Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP). In addition to the habitat areas and existing public trail network, other land uses include a 5.5 -acre farm, an unpaved public parking lot and an emergency helipad. By permit, model helicopters are allowed to be flown in a designated area surrounding a helipad. Civic Center The 8.23 acres of designated Civic Center was purchased from GSA in two parcels. There are no use restrictions on the land acquired by the City in -fee for Civic Center use. The Civic Center includes the City Hall offices, maintenance yard, an open grassy areas, a sand volleyball court, one tennis court and the "Rancho Caninos" temporary dog park. This is the site of the City's annual July 4th Independence Day Celebration. Palos Verdes on the Net, Peninsula Volunteer Alert Network (PVAN) and Peninsula Seniors also have facilities on the property. Coast Guard The U.S. Coast Guard also owns a 3.93 acre parcel located on the west promontory overlooking the Point Vicente Lighthouse, which is the site of several communications towers and a historic WWII -era artillery bunker. Active Recreational Opportunities Point Vicente Park is conditioned by deed to allow continuous public access for recreational use in perpetuity. The land may not be sold or transferred to any entity other than another governmental agency, and then only with the consent of the Department of the Interior. The park land has an approved Program of Utilization (POU) that describes future development. Any change to that Program must be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Parks and Recreation. The park land may not be leased and any concession agreement for operation of recreational facilities must be approved by the National Park Service and the State Department of Recreation and Parks. While the majority of the park is restricted for passive recreation, the POU identifies a 6.6 -acre area in the northern portion of the property to be used for active recreational purposes. However, this area of the site is now part of the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve, where active recreation would not be permitted. According to the Conservation & Open Space Elements section of the City's General Plan, "Any changes in land use to the property through future Master Planning efforts would require approval by the Planning Commission and City Council through public hearings along with review and approval of a change, if necessary, to the Program of Utilization by the National Park Service." Staff Parks Master Plan Update 66 103 approached the National Park Service in 2014 about the possibility of moving the 6.6 -acre active recreation area from its current location adjacent to the Villa Capri Condominiums to the upper portion of the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities. In September 2014, the National Park Service representative concurred that this proposal would be consistent with the site's POU (see attached email). A potential reconfiguration of the 6.6 -acre area to the upper portion of the site is depicted in yellow in the aerial photograph below: LADA NIKE Site 55, Point Vicente, Rancho Palos Verdes (GSA No. 9 -D -Calif -1088) Potential Skate Park/Plaza On April 15th, 2014, the Council tasked the Director of Recreation and Parks to work with the Skatepark PV Inc. (SPV) Board of Directors to review, evaluate and modify as necessary, the skate park proposal by SPV and report back to the City Council with a recommendation specifically addressing the feasibility of allowing a privately funded skate park to be constructed at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. Staff analyzed the feasibility of the project by looking at a number of factors including a) needs assessment; b) consistency with the 1989 Parks Master Plan; c) consistency with the 2008 Coast Vision Plan; d) Program of Utilization/Zoning; e) financial/liability analysis; and f) visual/aesthetic concerns. Upon completion of the analysis, staff believes that, if it is the desire of the Council and the community to have such a facility at Point Vicente Park, it would be feasible to construct a skate park on the property that conforms with the site's current zoning/land use deed restrictions, and that issues concerning financing, insurance and visual/aesthetic concerns could be addressed through the proper agreements, operating procedures, and project design/site placement. Council directed staff to update the Parks Master Plan prior to making a decision regarding the SPV skate park proposal. It is still Staff's position that a skate park is a feasible component that would serve a wide range of people, but particularly the traditionally underserved teenager and Parks Master Plan Update 67 ' mi young adult population. A skate park received a 4 out of 5 on Point Vicente Park/Civic Center Workshop comment cards, strong support from the Tape Dot Exercise, and slightly more respondents choosing to support the skate park, over don't support it on the online survey. (Note: the term "skate park" was used on the online survey, rather than SPV's preferred "skate plaza" nomenclature. This was done for the sake of clarity because "skate park" is a more common name for such a facility.) RVP MULTI -USE PLAZA0 Pillar MULTI -USE AREA PLAN DeAgs Studios RANCHO PALO$ VERGES, CA Overview of proposed 15,000 square foot skate plaza location The 15,000 square foot design may be larger than needed. Several Councilmembers expressed concern about its size and prominent location. Appendix E details a number of local skate parks, most of which range from 8,000 to 10,000 square feet. The very popular Peck Park Skate Park in San Pedro, for example, is 8,000 feet. A smaller footprint would also allow for more flexibility in where the skate park is located on site and how it is configured, leaving additional room for other components, additional parking, or a larger village green. Point Vicente Park/Civic Center has ample space, is located on a major street, and can be accessed by public transportation. Skateboarders would not be able to access the location by skateboard due an existing skateboarding ban on Hawthorne Boulevard. SPV has indicated that they would be able and willing to finance the design and construction of the project. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: Develop Senior Center. Add irrigation, turf and fencing to the athletic field. Add public restroom. Construct two paddle tennis courts. Add pedestrian paths throughout property. Construct ampthitheater with semi -circular benches. Build Municipal golf course which would wrap around existing and proposed park facilities (included Point Vicente Interpretive Center) 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force Parks Master Plan Update 68 105 • Remodeled City Hall Complex • Relocated Maintenance Yard • Underground Parking • Gymnasium and Pool Complex • Village Green • Band Shell with Stage • Art Center • Baseball and Soccer Fields • Volleyball/Handball/Tetherball/Paddle Tennis Courts • Trail Heads to Access Open Space Upper Point Vicente Conceptual Plan Fig. l (REV75EDJ 2008 Coast Vision Plan: Recommended a formal master plan of site to include: • Market analysis of potential arts and recreation facilities • Programs to serve a range of possible uses and user groups • Parking needs analysis • Incorporate utilities study • Pursue funding sources Components Included: • New City hall • New City Surface Parking Lot • Village Green • Community Center • Cultural Center • Trail Head • Unspecified new uses with consolidate parking Parks Master Plan Update 69 Me 2 e1 n� CP i 6 1'WOW - 1 s 1 New Cty Hal ti . 2 Hew Ciy SLrtace Parkrig Lot �� _ �In`. 3 Vllage Green d Crrnmunty Cen6er t ! 5 CWhisICenLer 1 Lona Tc-rrn Fl n 6 New uses wHh corsoldated parWns ,. _ F 3 Trail Hoed H Hellpad CP coast Guard Property Coast Vision Plan/Long Term Plan 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS The number of undeveloped acres at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center combined with its tremendous ocean views, and location adjacent to City Hall has made it a focal point for potential development plans and site improvements throughout the City's history. The Point Vicente Park/Civic Center site has been viewed as a resource that could accommodate a number of civic, recreation, and cultural needs. The City Hall buildings are in great need of renovation to meet organizational needs, comply with safety and code requirements, and comply with all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines. Recommendations: • Authorize a facilitated Master Plan Design and Public Outreach Process for Point Vicente Park/Civic Center using the Coast Vision Plan Long Term Plan as a base document with the inclusion of a skate park in the "new uses" area. • Confirm the following recommended components to be included in Master Plan Process ✓ City Hall ✓ Community Center ✓ Skate Park/Plaza (not to exceed 10,000 feet) ✓ Outdoor Swimming Pool ✓ Shade Structures ✓ Children's Playground ✓ Walking paths w/fitness stations ✓ Enhanced amenities: picnic tables, benches, trash/recycling cansBBQs ✓ Improved Village Green ✓ Tennis courts ✓ Permanent dog park • Direct staff to continue the process to move the 6.6 acre parcel from its current location along the northerly boundary of the lower portion of Point Vicente to the upper portion of Parks Master Plan Update 70 107 the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities Incorporate results of Public Works Corporation Storage Yard Relocation process to study the possibility of spreading out the storage yard to strategic locations throughout the City with a smaller central office at City Hall, thereby increasing the efficiency of Public Works operations and allow for the potential development of all or part of the existing maintenance yard. CM 01 RANCHO HALO$ V VMS ST$U K PROPERTY NAME RPV BEACH ADDRESS 1 Ocean Trails Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7564-021-019* May 23, 2011 ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE -- SOURCE OF FUNDING Acquired as part of the Trump National Golf Course Development Agreement. Acquisition date February 8, 2006. Former Name Trump Beach. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTIONAF Public beach accessible by steep trail. Public access to trail via Trump National Golf Course and Founders Park. Native habitat area. RESTRICTIONS Must be consistent with approvals of overall project site. Dogs are not allowed on beach. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS Parks Master Plan Update 71 Ni 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: None 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 12015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS Upgrade park amenities Photo by Ed Shea/PVNET CITY OF UN{HO iPRO$ VIRKS PjLkks S4' ilm PROPERTY NAME Robert E. Ryan Park ADDRESS 30359 Hawthorne Blvd. PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED 7588-022-900 4/12/1977 7588-018-901 4/27/1982 7588-018-902 (3,551 sq ft portion) 3/30/10 ACQUISITION COST $1 ACREAGE 10.3 SOURCE OF FUNDING This property was transferred from the County to the City. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION The park was originally constructed and owned by the County of Los Angeles. Named for City Founder and former Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor Robert E. Ryan. Park former name was Rancho Palos Verdes Park. Upon incorporation of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, title to the park was transferred from the County to the City. This park features a community building with a small activity room and patio which are available for rent, a tot lot, playground, picnic areas with barbecues, fields, and a baseball diamond. Views from this park are superior, and the mature trees add to the atmosphere. RESTRICTIONS Parks Master Plan Update 72 me The property must be utilized in perpetuity for public recreation purposes. Should the City fail to do so, the deed specifies that the property be transferred back to the County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation. The softball field was leveled and improved in 2011 and a parking lot improvement project was completing in 2014, which increased the number of parking spaces and improved automobile access for disabled park patrons. PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: None 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force: Expand parking facilities water fountains. Consider adding dditional softball field. 2008 Coast Vision Plan: None 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Remodel or build new community building. Original building dates back to the 1960s. Larger building could accommodate more rentals and classes. • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible • Improved Amenities: Benches, picnic tables, bbqs, trash/recycling cans • Install shade structures • Fiber optic cabling to allow for unified communication with City Hall Parks Master Plan Update 73 110 WMR PAICS MRS FORS SYSTM PROPERTY NAME VISTA CATALINA PARK ADDRESS 1 Ocean Trails Drive PARCEL NUMBERS/DATE ACQUIRED Lot D 7564-027-005 Still VH prop Lot K 7564-020-112 1-26-06 VHS Prop Lot E—APN n/a Still VH Prop 7564-020-900 1-26-06 RPV Prop Lot G 7564-020-109 Still VH Prop Lot 1 7564-020-111 Still VH prop ACQUISITION COST $0 ACREAGE .2 SOURCE OF FUNDING Deeded to the City as part of the golf course development agreement. CURRENT USE/DESCRIPTION Small pocket park located adjacent to PV Drive South at main entrance to Trump National across from Marilyn Ryan Sunset Point Park. Park has magnificent views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina. RESTRICTIONS Must be consistent with approvals of overall project site. There is a condition on the property regarding special events. The park can have up to six temporary events per year within the park including, without limitation, filming events that close off portions of the park PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS 1989 Parks Master Plan: na 2005 Open Space Planning Task Force na 2008 Coast Vision Plan: none 2015 PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS • Transition to drought -tolerant landscaping where feasible • Continue to work with Trump National staff to maintain attractive appearance and accessibility Parks Master Plan Update 74 111 RELATED PLANS Palos Verdes Nature Preserve Public Use Master Plan (PUMP) The Palos Verdes Nature Preserve (Preserve) encompasses approximately 1,450 acres comprised of ten individual Reserves, 424 acres of which consists of the Portuguese Bend Reserve. The Preserve is owned by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes and is managed by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy (PVPLC) for ecological values and habitat restoration. This preserve is home to coastal sage scrub habitat, a community of intensely fragrant and highly drought resistant native shrubs and flowering plants. Living throughout this rare habitat are many different animals, including the threatened California gnatcatcher and coastal cactus wren and two species of endangered butterflies. The individual reserves provide excellent recreational opportunities, as they are full of networks of hiking, equestrian, and bicycle trails. There are 33 miles of hiking, equestrian, and mountain bike trails available to the public. The Preserve PUMP was established in 2006 and addresses issues germane to the Preserve such as public access, trailhead locations, parking, trail use, fencing, signage and lighting. The PUMP Committee holds regular public meetings at RPV City Hall. The Palos Verdes Nature Preserve already has a well-established system for receiving public input, reporting incidents, and initiating changes, and pursuing enhancements to the existing Preserve. Future significant changes/additions to the Preserve and any significant changes to its operating procedures should be incorporated into the PUMP. Trails Network Plan Update A significant effort to combine and unify the various City trails -related plan is currently underway. Several public workshops have already been conducted. The Trails Network Plan Update is being facilitated by the Community Development Department and seeks to consolidate and update the following plans: ✓ Conceptual Bikeways Plan -updated 1996 ✓ Conceptual Trails Plan- updated 1993 ✓ Preserve Trails Plan ✓ Ocean Front Estates Trails ✓ Terranea Resort Trails ✓ Trump National Trails ✓ California Coastal Trail Proposed changes are subject to public input and City Council approval. Parks Master Plan Update 75 112 Appendices: Appendix A: 1989 Parks Master Plan Update Appendix B: 2005 Open Space Planning & Recreation and Parks Task Force Final Report Appendix C: Coast Vision Plan Report and Amendments Appendix D. Comprehensive Public Outreach Results Appendix E Sport Fields/Facilities/Skate Park/Youth League Information Appendix F: Status/Update of 1989 Parks Master Plan Recommendations Appendix G: Ladera Linda Resident -Generated Survey Appendix H: Park Amenities Parks Master Plan Update 76 113 CITY OF !IRANCHO PALOS VERDES TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: COUNCILWOMAN SUSAN BROOKS DATE: MAY 20, 2014 SUBJECT: PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDATE AND ENHANCEMENT— STAFF IMPLEMENTATION AND FOLLOW UP REPORT RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to provide an update to the 1989 Parks Master Plan. BACKGROUND It has been 25 years since the City Council has addressed our Parks Master Plan. After numerous'pocket park' requests and staff involvement with different communities regarding a potential future for use of our Parks, it is apparent that time and money have been spent on plans which may or may not be part of what the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes want to see and are willing to pay for in the way of taxes. I am requesting that staff proceed with a revisit and suggested update of the existing Parks Master Plan. This Plan would be presented to Council and the public for input and feedback regarding the future of our parks and their corresponding programs. This undertaking might require a large amount of staff time and resources, as various communities would be contacted for input and potential Town Hall meetings will likely occur. Regardless, I believe it is imperative we have an established Plan, as does our sister city, Palos Verdes Estates, so that we are proactive with the wishes of the Rancho Palos Verdes community, as a whole. Attached is a copy of the 1989 Parks Master Plan. 114 A MEMORANDUM RANCHO PALOS VERDES TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CORY LINDER, DIRECTOR, RECREATION AND PARKS9P DATE: JULY 29, 2014 SUBJECT: POINT VICENTE PARK SKATE PARK FEASIBILITY REVIEWED: CAROLYNN PETRU, ACTING CITY MANAGER Staff Coordinator: Matt Waters, Senior Administrative Analyst, Recreation and Parkq�p RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to: 1) Complete the Parks Master Plan Update; 2) Initiate an update of the Coast Vision Plan; and 3) Include Skatepark PV's proposal for a skate park at Point Vicente Park as part of these efforts. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 15th, 2014, the Council tasked the Director of Recreation and Parks to work with the Skatepark PV Inc. (SPV) Board of Directors to review, evaluate and modify as necessary, the skate park proposal by SPV and report back to the City Council with a recommendation specifically addressing the feasibility of allowing a privately funded skate park to be constructed at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. Staff analyzed the feasibility of the project by looking at a number of factors including a) needs assessment; b) consistency with the 1989 Parks Master Plan; c) consistency with the 2008 Coast Vision Plan; d) Program of Utilization/Zoning; e) financial/liability analysis; and f) visual/aesthetic concerns. Upon completion of the analysis, staff believes that, if it is the desire of the Council and the community to have such a facility at Point Vicente Park, it would be feasible to construct a skate park on the property that conforms with the site's current zoning/land use deed restrictions, and that issues concerning financing, insurance and visual/aesthetic concerns could be addressed through the proper agreements, operating procedures, and project design/site placement. However, staff has serious reservations about proceeding with such a significant capital project on a piecemeal basis, without the benefit of an updated Parks Master Plan and the Coast Vision Plan. Therefore, staff recommends completing the update to these plans prior to making a decision regarding the SPV skate park proposal. 115 Point Vicente Skate Park Feasibility Date: July 29, 2014 Page 2 BACKGROUND SPV, a 501-c-3 non-profit organization, has actively advocated for a skate park to be located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula for a number of years. In 2010, SPV approached the City about a skate park at Lower Hesse Park during the City's Lower Hesse Park and Grandview Improvement Project. Council authorized a contract with the consulting firm, Mia Lehrer and Associates (ML+A), to assist the City in identifying suitable sites for a skate park facility. On September 6, 2011, ML+A's scope of work was expanded to include a dog park site analysis in addition to the skate park site analysis. In 2012, two skate park projects located in adjacent cities moved forward. On June 12, 2012 the Rolling Hills Estates City Council approved a 9,000 square foot skate park as part of the Ernie Howlett Master Plan with the understanding the SPV would fundraise for the park's design and construction. The City of Los Angeles announced that it would begin construction of an 8,000 square foot skate park at Peck Park in San Pedro, located directly across Western Avenue from the City of RPV's border. The Peck Park skate park is scheduled to open on August 15th. SPV's Past -President shared with staff in 2012 that the Ernie Howlett Park skate park best fit SPV's goals and they were going to focus on fundraising at that location. Following these developments, the Council suspended work on a skate park in Rancho Palos Verdes on June 19, 2012 and discontinued its contract with ML+A. However, 2013 soil test results for the proposed Ernie Howlett site determined that the designated area would not support the weight of a concrete skate plaza. The Ernie Howlett Master Plan no longer includes a Skate Park project. Members of the SPV Board of Directors approached several members of the City Council earlier this year to discuss a privately funded and maintained skate park to be located at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. SPV supporters also raised this possibility during public comments at the March 4, 2014 City Council meeting. Subsequently, at its April 15, 2014 meeting, the City Council approved a recommendation from Mayor Duhovic directing Recreation staff to work with (SPV) to "...review, evaluate and modify as necessary, the skate park proposal by SPV and report back to the City Council with a recommendation specifically addressing the feasibility of allowing a privately funded skate park to be constructed on City Hall property." DISCUSSION The Proposal Recreation staff met recently with SPV Vice -President Jim Parker to clarify and confirm the significant components of SPV's proposal. The proposal is essentially the same as the proposal contained in Mayor Duhovic's April 15, 2014 report. SPV proposes a privately -funded and maintained multi -use 15,000 square foot skate park at Point Vicente Park/Civic Center. The proposed location (fig. A) is the existing lawn area between the existing tennis court and the main City Hall parking lot. Mr. Parker emphasized that the site would not need to be supervised, and would be designed to accommodate City events, as well as function as a skate park. 116 Point Vicente Skate Park Feasibility Date: July 29, 2014 Page 3 The proposal includes: *Construction of up to 19 asphalt -lined parking spaces *A solid, grouted concrete block, steel door, restroom facility -approximately 10'by12' *At least two concrete picnic style tables *At least one large plaza interior planter *A raised seating/platform area that could also be used as an amphitheater or stage *Installation of a permanent drinking fountain *Electrical/water conduit should the City wish to utilize it a later date *Rehabilitation of the Tennis Court surface and fencing *Relocation of the Volleyball Court (if necessary) *Maintenance expenses for a 10 -year agreement MVP MULTI -USE PLAZA • Derl � fkudl�i MULTI -USE AREA PLAN RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA Fig. A (overview of proposed skate plaza location) The following is an analysis of the project's feasibility based on a) needs assessment; b) consistency with the 1989 Parks Master Plan; c) consistency with the 2008 Coast Vision Plan; d) Program of Utilization/Zoning; e) liability/usage concerns; f) financial/construction analysis; and g) visual/aesthetic concerns. A) Needs Assessment Number of Skaters: The Public Skate Park Development Guide, composed of recommendations from skate park advocates including the Tony Hawk Foundation, contains a formula for estimating the number of skateboarders in a community and the corresponding skate park needs. The Guide estimates that 16% of youth between the ages of 5 and 24 are skateboarders. 15,769 total youth within the four Peninsula cities equals approximately 2,500 skateboarders, of whom approximately 1,600 are in Rancho Palos Verdes. Based on those figures, the guide recommends 32,000 square feet of skate park facilities for the Peninsula, 117 Point Vicente Skate Park Feasibility Date: July 29, 2014 Page 4 although Peck Park's proximity might lower that estimation. SPV personnel report anecdotal complaints from parents about having to repeatedly drive their children off the Peninsula to access a skate park. Existing Skate Parks: Skate parks in proximity to the Peninsula are the Hermosa Beach Stake Park, Carson Skate Park, Wilmington Skate Park, and Peck Park in the City of Los Angeles. B) Master Plan The City last updated its Parks Master Plan in 1989. Recommended priorities for the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center site included a senior citizens center, two paddle tennis courts, pedestrian paths, a permanent amphitheater, turf and irrigation improvements, and a municipal golf course (including the grounds of Lower Point Vicente). There is no mention in the document of a skate park or skate plaza. The Open Space Planning and Recreation and Parks Task Force was tasked by City Council in 2003 with updating the Parks Master Plan. The Task Force's 2005 recommendations for the Point Vicente Park included many recreation elements, one of which was a skate park. No design details, dimensions or cost estimates were provided for the skate park. However, the Task Force's recommendations, which were included in a Draft Strategic Parks Master Plan, were not adopted by Council. In 2009, the City Council initiated the creation of a Civic Center Master Plan, however this planning effort was placed on hold in 2012. While there is nothing in the 1989 Master Plan that specifically recommends or discourages a skate park, it is worth noting that the City Council recently directed Recreation staff to conduct a Parks Master Plan update. This update will include Point Vicente Park. Staff recommends including SPV's proposal as part of the master plan process prior to the City making a commitment to a significant and permanent capital improvement on the property that could limit or conflict with the City's long term needs and/or other desired improvements for the property. C) 2008 Coast Vision Plan On September 2, 2008 the City Council adopted the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast Vision Plan. The Vision Plan represented over two years of planning and an extensive public outreach effort to create an informational planning document of the City's coast areas. The Vision Plan included five key locations, including Point Vicente Park. The plan focused on public access, recreational amenities, and education materials to enhance the coastal experience for residents and visitors. The Vision Plan lays out a phased approach to improve Point Vicente Park. Recommended elements include an Arts Cultural Center, a new City Council Chamber and City Hall, a pool/gymnasium complex, a village green, centralized parking, an amphitheater, expanded/linked trail system, and high quality landscaping. MUOO • Point Vicente Skate Park Feasibility Date: July 29, 2014 Page 5 (fig b) .'h ". VkmtHel=_t AnH ,fit , cwgnopwy CP F.. IT + 4j' 3 6 1 i 6 d� `ani YR,goes Nh-p ` � 1 H Heipoq cr Canq e..,N �M 4 C.5 a q,gwrxm olr.,s�=� S (fig b) .'h ". VkmtHel=_t AnH ,fit , cwgnopwy CP F.. IT + 4j' 3 6 1 i 6 The proposed location of the skate plaza overlays the village green section of both the mid- term and long-term plan (fig b). The Vision Plan notes that the village green could accommodate multiple elements including a sunken grass amphitheater, a Veteran's memorial or public art, and would still function as a community gathering area on a daily basis and for events such as the Fourth of July celebration. Additions/improvements to Point Vicente Park have typically been minor in scope or temporary, such as the temporary Senior Center or Rancho Caninos Dog Park. The installation of a permanent, concrete skate plaza facility is inconsistent with the adopted Vision Plan, although SPV's proposal does include a public gathering area component. SPV has indicated that they are willing to discuss alternate locations both at Point Vicente Park and at other locations in the City. D) Program of Utilization/Deed Restrictions The 73.3 Point Vicente Park site is comprised of 8.23 acres dedicated to institutional use (most of the flat portion of the site -owned in fee title by the City), 51.3 acres of Open Space Preserve Lands, and 13.82 acres of Recreational Passive park land. 65.12 acres of the site were given to the City by the Federal Government and are subject to various deed restrictions and a Program of Utilization overseen by the National Park Service. There is a potential exception for 6.6 acres of the 65.12 acres to be used for active recreational use. SPV's proposal would occupy a portion of Point Vicente Park that is currently restricted by the Federal Program of Utilization. According to the Conservation & Open Space Elements section of the City's General Plan, "Any changes in land use to the property through future Master Planning efforts would require approval by the Planning Commission and City Council through public hearings along with review and approval of a change, if necessary, to the 119 `ani YR,goes Nh-p ` � 1 H Heipoq cr Canq e..,N �M The proposed location of the skate plaza overlays the village green section of both the mid- term and long-term plan (fig b). The Vision Plan notes that the village green could accommodate multiple elements including a sunken grass amphitheater, a Veteran's memorial or public art, and would still function as a community gathering area on a daily basis and for events such as the Fourth of July celebration. Additions/improvements to Point Vicente Park have typically been minor in scope or temporary, such as the temporary Senior Center or Rancho Caninos Dog Park. The installation of a permanent, concrete skate plaza facility is inconsistent with the adopted Vision Plan, although SPV's proposal does include a public gathering area component. SPV has indicated that they are willing to discuss alternate locations both at Point Vicente Park and at other locations in the City. D) Program of Utilization/Deed Restrictions The 73.3 Point Vicente Park site is comprised of 8.23 acres dedicated to institutional use (most of the flat portion of the site -owned in fee title by the City), 51.3 acres of Open Space Preserve Lands, and 13.82 acres of Recreational Passive park land. 65.12 acres of the site were given to the City by the Federal Government and are subject to various deed restrictions and a Program of Utilization overseen by the National Park Service. There is a potential exception for 6.6 acres of the 65.12 acres to be used for active recreational use. SPV's proposal would occupy a portion of Point Vicente Park that is currently restricted by the Federal Program of Utilization. According to the Conservation & Open Space Elements section of the City's General Plan, "Any changes in land use to the property through future Master Planning efforts would require approval by the Planning Commission and City Council through public hearings along with review and approval of a change, if necessary, to the 119 Point Vicente Skate Park Feasibility Date: July 29, 2014 Page 6 Program of Utilization by the National Park Service." Staff recently had a conversation with David Siegenthaler of the National Park Service to discuss the possibility of swapping the 6.6 acre parcel from its current location along the northerly boundary of the lower portion of Point Vicente to the upper portion of the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities (Figs. C & D). This exchange would potentially allow for the installation of a skate park or other active use(s) at that location. The initial verbal response to staff's inquiry was positive. Staff has followed up with a letter (attached) seeking to confirm and memorialize the conversation. (Fig C) (fig D) An alternative possibility would be to consider relocating the proposal to the Institutionally - zoned portion of the property that is not subject to the POU. As mentioned previously, SPV is amenable to discussing different locations, which could be facilitated by the Parks Master Plan and Coast Vision Plan update process. E) Liability/Insurance Concerns The California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) provides a template for 120 Point Vicente Skate Park Feasibility Date: July 29, 2014 Page 7 recommended guidelines for the design, construction and operation of skate parks / plazas. The template generally speaks to the design and construction process and goes into more detail with its proposed operation. The operation recommendations describe both supervised and unsupervised facilities. Design and construction code/licensing all are required. Since this facility is proposed to be unsupervised; mixed use (skateboards, in-line skates, bicycles, and scooters) is strongly not recommended by CJPIA. Differing design elements and functional, performance differences between the various uses make them incompatible and a liability risk. The basic recommendation is for an unsupervised site with clearly posted signage indicating the skate plaza's allowed and disallowed uses, along with rules for proper operation. Staff discussed this issue with SPV, who were agreeable to prohibiting mixed use. F) Financial/Construction Analysis SPV confirmed to staff its estimated construction costs for the skate plaza and the afore- mentioned amenities to be between $650,000 and $/50,000. SPV stated that they had not done an in-depth cost analysis, but had based their totals on an industry standard of $40 to $45 per square foot for construction. Pillar Design Studios who created their proposed design, assisted with the calculations. For comparison's sake, the recently -completed 8,000 square foot skate park at Peck Park cost $800,000, or $100 per square foot. Staff informed SPV that any potential construction on City land would be overseen by City personnel and would be subject to prevailing wage requirements. Annual maintenance costs are estimated at $13,000 annually. City permit fees for the project were roughly estimated at $12,000 to $15,000, which potentially could be waived if the skate plaza proceeds as a City/SPV partnership. SPV affirmed that their plan would be to actively fundraise to cover the project's costs after a formal use agreement was established. Staff recommends a thorough financial analysis of the project, including construction, maintenance and operation costs, if Council directs staff to continue working with SPV. Any potential partnership with SPV would require formal agreements detailing the financial, insurance, maintenance and dual -use obligations. G) Visual/Aesthetic/Logistical Concerns The location selected by SPV is situated very prominently on the property. The design includes an approximately 4 -foot high wall on the north side of the proposed plaza that could obscure the view of the skate park and grassy areas for motorists entering and departing the area. The skate plaza would be the first significant element most visitors would see upon their arrival at City Hall. Staff also opined to SPV that the location of the plaza's main stage would not be conducive to events such as the Fourth of July because it is oriented towards the skate park and not to the main section of the site's grass area. The skate plaza is also situated in very close proximity to other existing recreational amenities at the park, including the tennis court, volleyball court and dog park. Use of the skate park may conflict with or change the user experience at these other facilities, while other features of the project, such as the permanent restrooms, drinking fountain, picnic tables and additional parking, would 121 Point Vicente Skate Park Feasibility Date: July 29, 2014 Page 8 benefit all park users. SPV was very willing to discuss changing the orientation of the main stage, re -aligning the existing location, or even relocating the entire venue if necessary. CONCLUSION SPV's proposal has significant, but not insurmountable hurdles to overcome if the Council wishes to move forward with the project. A more in depth financial analysis of the proposal needs to be conducted to take into account such costs as environmental review, grading, site preparation or other currently unknown factors; the proposed use was not contemplated as part of the Council -adopted Coast Vision Plan; visual/logistical concerns would need to be modified and addressed; and there is a current Parks Master Plan revision in progress that could alter the overall plan for the property. SPV has reiterated,its willingness to modify and even relocate its proposal, and they have confirmed their intent to fundraise to cover the costs of construction and maintenance when and if they enter into a formal agreement with the City. However, staff has serious reservations about proceeding with such a significant capital project on a piecemeal basis, without the benefit of an updated Parks Master Plan and the Coast Vision Plan. Therefore, staff recommends completing the update to these plans prior to making a decision regarding the SPV skate park proposal. ALTERNATIVES 1. Direct staff to proceed with the project as currently proposed and to update the Parks Master Plan and Coast Vision Plan based on this direction. 2.Deny the request to locate a skate park at the Point Vicente Park/Civic Center property. FINANCIAL IMPACT SPV's initial proposal indicates that it would bear financial responsibility for the construction of the skate plaza and maintenance expenses for a ten-year period. Attachments: April 15, 2014 Report From Mayor Duhovic SPV Site Graphics Excerpt of Coastal Vision Plan July 8, 2014 NPS/POU Letter Daily Breeze article regarding Peck Park Skate Park Skate Park Site Analysis Criteria 122 7-29-14 CC Agenda Attachment: Skate Park Proposal April 15, 2105 Report From Mayor Jerry Du hovic 123 CITY OF MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PALOS VERDES FROM: MAYOR JERRY V. DUHOVIC DATE: APRIL 15, 2014 SUBJECT: SKATE PARK AT POINT VICENTE PARK/CIVIC CENTER REVIEWED: CAROLYNN PETRO, ACTING CITY MANAGED RECOMMENDATION Request that Staff, specifically the Director of Recreation and Parks, work with the SkateparkPV ("SPV") Board of Directors to review, evaluate and modify as necessary, the skate park proposal by SPV and report back to the City Council with a recommendation specifically addressing the feasibility of allowing a privately funded skate park to be constructed on City Hall property. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The SkateparkPV ("SPV") Board of Directors has approached several members of the current City Council with a proposal to build a privately funded and maintained skate park on City Hall property. Proponents of the project also attended the March 4th City Council meeting and addressed the concept during Public Comments. As an advocate for both passive and active recreation, I am requesting that Staff be directed to work with the SPV Board of Directors to review, evaluate, and modify as necessary, the proposal presented by SPV and report back to the City Council with a recommendation specifically addressing the feasibility of allowing a privately funded skate park to be constructed on City Hall property. BACKGROUND Over the years, there have been many discussions, requests and studies with respect to constructing a skate park facility within the city of Rancho Palos Verdes. Much of the previous work entailed the City funding a portion, if not all of the cost associated with the construction and/or maintenance of such a facility. The current proposal by SPV envisions the City contributing only the location and Staff time to this endeavor. 124 In 2010, the City engaged an outside third -parry consultant, Mia Leher, to address the feasibility of and recommend locations for both a skate park and a dog park facility. That engagement was ultimately terminated when the City initiated the Rancho Caninos "temporary" dog park at City Hall. The City Council discontinued the contract with Mia Lehrer on June 19, 2012, directing Staff to suspend work on the skate park project pending the outcome of efforts to construct similar facilities at Ernie Howlett Park in Rolling Hills Estates and at Peck Park in San Pedro. I will not address all of the prior efforts with respect to a skate park facility in Rancho Palos Verdes at this time. The record speaks for itself and the facts and circumstances at this point in time are different. DISCUSSION I believe the idea of constructing a privately funded and maintained skate park on City Hall property, as long as the project does not conflict with the Civic Center Master Plan, has merit and should be brought forward for further discussion/debate. This is the first step in that process. As a brief summary, the SPV Board of Directors proposes to construct a privately funded and maintained skate park on City Hall property. A conceptual rendering is attached depicting the facility being constructed in the lawn area between the existing tennis court and main parking lot serving City Hall, although other areas on the property may also be considered. SPV proposes the construction of a skate -able multi -use plaza of approximately 15,000 sq. ft. with the following specifics/parameters: • Construction of up to 19 asphalt lined parking spaces; • Construction of a solid, grouted concrete block, steel door, restroom facility - approximately 10' x12; • Construction of at least two concrete picnic style bench tables (as shown on www.skateparkov.oral; • Construction of at least one large plaza interior planter; • Construction of a raised seating/platform area that could easily be used as an amphitheater or stage; • Installation of a permanent drinking fountain; • Running empty electrical/water conduit should the city wish to utilize it at a later date; • Rehabilitation of the City Hall Tennis Court surface and fencing; • Relocation of the City Hall Volleyball Court, if necessary; and • Deposit of funds into an escrow account to cover maintenance costs for 10 years (amount to be determined by Staff). Said amount to be replenished annually to maintain the required reserve level. Again please note that all of the aforementioned improvements will be paid for by SPV. V:\CAROLYNN\REPORTS\2014\20140415_DuhovicSkate Park Study Session Report ver4.doc 125 ALTERNATIVES Take no action. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of approving the above recommendation is minimal. The only cost should be the contribution of Staff time as described above. Attachment: Skate Park PV proposed site plan V.\CAROLYNN\REPORTS12014120140415 Duhovic Skate Park Study Session Report ver4.doc 126 127 00, III. Ip N��A�k C� • :�r 7-29-14 CC Agenda Attachment: Skate Park Proposal SPV Site Graphics 129 •, r LU uj QO S Q �U, LU _ l7 uJ + ~ GO `. (1) W Z p UJ d w� C� U I MIJ r °xZ ac"'i�i 1 i WOO ii 4 hear =I m A,f AP sm 7-29-14 CC Agenda Attachment: Skate Park Proposal Excerpt of Coastal Vision Plan 136 u�rper r-o7nr'✓it:.tlstt Existing Cus�difinr�a I I KED' SITES UPPER POINT VICENTE This site is zoned Open Space Recreation. Designated as Point Vicente Park/Civic Center, the site was formerly a Nike Missile Base, and presently includes and surrounds the City's civic center complex. Existing facilities are housed in former school buildings and temporary buildings. The surrounding grounds are improved with a sand volleyball court, tennis court, open grass areas, a picnic table and barbecue. With spectacular views of the ocean and Catalina Island, this site is the location of community gatherings such as the City's annual July 4th Independence Day Celebration. The site encompasses 22 acres and abuts a 4 acre Coast Guard parcel to the west. It is otherwise surrounded by Preserve lands that wrap around the site to Palos Verdes Drive, A farming operation exists on the southern facing slope below the site, which is operated in a lease agreement. Nearly 27,500 square feet of building area is currently developed on the site, including the City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall offices, studio facilities for PV On the Net, and temporary modular buildings for the PV Seniors, The City Maintenance Yard is also located on the site. There are 88 existing paved parking spaces provided on-site. The site also incorporates a helipad used by emergency services providers. SITE GOALS As a result of the public Vision Plan process, and discussion with City staff and elected leadership, the following goals have been established for the concept design for this site; Advance the conceptual design or the Upper Point Vicente site based on the modified'Civic Center Conceptual Site Plan' (as presented to the City Council April 18, 2006, and included in the Appendix to this document) The site shall be able to accommodate an Arts/ Cultural Center, City Council Chamber and City Hall, a pool/gymnasium complex, a village green, centralized parking and an amphitheater. Ensure that the Civic Center is connected by a network of high quality, vibrant public landscapes and is visually integrated into the surrounding Preserve hand Link Upper Point Vicente into the City's trail system and to other major destinations in the City Implement an integrated, context sensitive approach to access and parking for all users SITE CONCEPT PLAN Fl s-,ory The concept plan for this site has evolved throughout this Vision Plan process. The site was originally the study of the City's Open Space Task Force, which produced a plan incorporating a wide range of community and recreational uses. This plan was considered in this Vision Plan process, however, direction was provided by the Rancho Palos Verdes City Manager to include a narrow range of uses in this concept plan. This approach was endorsed by the City Council during the public Vision Plan process. Iterations were considered, and interested site user groups were interviewed. Finally, a phased approach to implement the concept design was proposed, and is described below and illustrated to the right. Phased Approach The concept design depicts a phased, short-, medium-, APPROVED - 2. 2008 137 CP 'v d"dairy tVrunnry l4yPM-Iil I A I U. 4Cmuudcv opct- Space U, vl.-Acfi�,.0 miv�, W I— 6 CP ��--.:qty `\\� B:dd�lg•' ,VIM re it Gic— APPROVED - September 2. 2008 m 2 _1' 1H L-_5 5 2 —::=--7> ::=--7> I 7 — — upper Po,nf Vicente Concept Plan and prla.")q� 2 3 CP` 4 P'jq%,,y0tyPmiunqL,'n impiovad OpLn spuce 4141)'"Cloo opc" SPOCC .71ound mise e sdo 6 Relocaccd Mointariance, Y, C PICNC Pod Tr'm Hood H HeMPOCI CP Cws-, Guard Pioperty I N- City Hal -,NL:'CKy$WJ.!CCP1(k111g10A \rIN4g, Given Cnmmu,,Izy cc,it. ': LILUNI(C-81MI 6 Now Uses Mh corwhdmcd parlonq a 1;411 Iiiad HH C4, Pall t:P CON't Gu_t( PiopetLY Ohl KEY SITES I 138 - KEY SITES and long-term approach to the site development. In the short-term, positive impact would result from simply moving the Maintenance Yard (shown at 80,000 sf) to the east, and creating a consolidated open space area in the center of the site. At this early stage, a trailhead serving the adjacent Preserve trails could also be added, together with trail connections and associated picnic areas around the bluff edge of the site. In the medium-term, a Village Green (depicted at 1.7 acres in size), which could also accommodate an amphitheater [3], Veteran's Memorial and/or public art, as well as the City's 4th of July celebration, might be created, together with a cultural center (shown at 30,000 sf on two levels) which could host activities relating to the arts including studio and gallery space, class and performance space, both indoors and outdoors; a community center complex (shown at 20,000 sf on two levels), which might accommodate meeting space for community groups, recreational facilities, classroom space and a full sized recreational pool (50m x 25m), In the long-term, a City Hall complex (shown at 36,000 sf on two levels) could be developed, incorporating administrative facilities and a Council Chamber. Further. the City's Maintenance Yard could be relocated off site, freeing space for other open space or developed uses. At this stage consolidated parking could be developed, in a structure partially below grade, which might enable additional open space or other site uses, including areas for active recreation, to be created. Maintaining the Site Character Though this site is one of three within the Vision Plan identified to accommodate new public uses within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, the vision statement and goals developed for this Plan, as well as the design guidance material included in Chapter 5 of this document, clearly recommend open space and view preservation within the Rancho Palos Verdes Coast, as well as context sensitive building and site design. Ultimately, at each phase of concept design implementation, the site should retain its park like setting and precious ocean views, and provide access into the adjoining Preserve trail system. Recommendations for Irnpierrler,tatic�r; Initiate a formal master plan of the site, including market analysis relating to potential arts and recreation facilities, a space program to serve a range of possible uses and user groups, a parking needs analysis related to the potential users, and incorporate the utility study presently being undertaken for the site. Immediately pursue funding sources (grants, etc.) to implement the on-site trailhead and trail connections on site, as well as to relocate and reconfigure the City's Maintenance Yard. Research potential off-site locations suitable for the Cays maintenance yard APPROVED - Seprerrlt)& 2 200- 139 7-29-14 CC Agenda Attachment: Skate Park Proposal July 8, 2014 NPS/POU Letter CITY OFRAf ICHO PALOSVERDES OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 8 July 2014 David Siegenthaler Federal Lands to Parks Program National Park Service, Pacific West Region 333 Bush St., Ste. 500 San Francisco, CA 94104-2828 SUBJECT: Proposal for Revised Location of 6.6 -Acre Active Recreation Area under the Program of Utilization for LADA Nike Site 55, Point Vicente, Rancho Palos Verdes (GSA No. 9 -Calif -D-1088) Dear Mr. Siegenthaler: As you may recall, last December I discussed with you a proposal to relocate the 6.6 -acre active recreational use area identified in the Program of Utilization (POU) from its current location along the northerly boundary of the lower portion of Point Vicente Park/Civic Center to the upper portion of the park adjacent to the existing City Hall facilities. To maximize the City's opportunities at the site, the City is interested in exploring the possibility of rearranging area designations on the site (i.e., "active recreation" vs. "passive recreation" designations), provided that the general conditions of the POU are maintained. Enclosed is a copy of Figure 6 from the POU, depicting the approximate location and extent of the designated active recreation area in red. During our telephone conversation in December 2013, you indicated that you believed that the relocation of the active recreation area would not require a "formal" amendment to the POU. Therefore, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes now presents our proposal for the relocated active recreation area for your review and concurrence. The areas outlined in yellow in the enclosed diagram encompass just under 6.6 acres of the upper portion of the park site, while the areas that are shaded in blue are those that are not subject to the use restrictions imposed under the POU. The areas to be included within the active recreation area include the existing tennis and sand volleyball courts, as well as undeveloped portions of the park that are often used for community events and overflow parking. The proposed active recreation area boundaries would mesh with those of the existing unrestricted area of the property, and would also avoid encroachment into the City's nature preserve (shaded in green in the enclosed exhibits). Currently, the 30940 HAWTHORNF RIMA / RANCHO Himns VERUFs, CA 90275-5391 / (310) 544-5205 / FAX (310) 544-5291 1 --MAIL. CLCIIRORPVCOM / WWW.PAI-0SVI;R0E5C0M/RPV PRINTED ON RKAGLED PAPER 141 David Siegenthaler 8 July 2014 Page 2 designated 6.6 -acre active recreational use area is located almost wholly within the nature reserve. Allowing the relocation of the designated 6.6 -acre active recreation area to the upper portion of the site would: Place the upper portions of the park that are already used for active recreation and community purposes within the active recreation area; Protect the integrity of the City's nature preserve by removing the active recreation designation within the lower portion of the park; and, Provide the City with greater flexibility for the future use and development of the unrestricted portions of the park site. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes respectfully seeks your written concurrence (on behalf of the National Park Service) with the relocation of the 6.6 -acre active recreational area at LADA Nike Site 55, as described herein and depicted in the enclosed exhibits. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Senior Administrative Analyst Kit Fox at (310) 544-5226 or kltf@rpv.com. Sincerely, Carolynn etru Acting City Manager enclosures cc: Cory Linder, Director of Recreation & Parks Kit Fox, Senior Administrative Analyst MAMunicipal FacilitloslCivic Center Master PI2nQO140708 sieagenthaler_ActiveReereation.doex .M l Provide 100' Buffer from Emergency Helipad - Existing ±6.6 -Acre Active Recreation Area (Approximate) LADA NIKE Site 55, Point Vicente, Rancho Palos Verdes (GSA No. 9 -D -Calif -1088) 144 7-29-14 CC Agenda Attachment: Skate Park Proposal July 18, 2014 Peck Park Skate Park Daily Breeze Article 145 Long-awaited Peck Park skate park almost ready to open in San Pedro Skater Riley Stevens hits one of the jumps at the barely completed Peck Park Skate Park in San Pedro on Thursday, July 17, 2014 during a video shoot for Councilman Buscaino's invite for the Grand Opening which will be held on Friday, August 15, at 5:30pm. By Donna l.ittleiohn. The Daily Breeze Posted: 07/18/14, 7:56 PM PD'f I Updated: 3 days ago Construction of a new skatepark at Peck Park in San Pedro is complete but still needs perimeter landscaping before it officially opens in early August. Thursday, July 17, 2014, San Pedro, CA. (Steve McCrank / Staff Photographer) San Pedro's new skate plaza at Peck Park won't open for another couple of weeks. But that hasn't stopped skaters from getting beyond the fencing to give the new attraction along Western Avenue a preliminary spin. While the grand opening is set for 5:30 p.m. Aug. 15, skaters can't seem to resist the temptation now that the plaza is finished, awaiting only some perimeter landscaping. "They're trying it out," said Mark Mariscal, region superintendent with the Los Angeles' Department of Recreation and Parks, who said park officials chased out about 20 skaters earlier this week. But they were back within hours. Because the plaza isn't open yet, however, liability issues loom, leading park and police officials to adopt a more hard-line approach in the days to come. From now on, police will be citing skaters with fines. City officials hope to resolve the matter by establishing an unofficial "soft" opening sometime before the Aug. 15 ceremony. Andy Harris of the San Pedro Skatepark Association, said the eagerness is to be expected considering how long local skaters have lobbied for a facility at Peck Park. The idea was first floated some 15 years ago. http://www.dailybreeze.com/lifestyle/20l407l 8/long-awaited-peck-park-skate-park-almost... 7/22/2014146 Long-awaited Peck Park skate park almost ready to open in San Pedro "That's what they get for taking as long as they did," said Harris, who served as an adviser on the design. "I don't know what they would expect." The city finally began soliciting feedback on a skate park design in 2010. With the strong backing of the Northwest San Pedro Neighborhood Council and Los Angeles Councilman Joe Buscaino, a groundbreaking for the $800,000 skate plaza was held in Fehruaty 2013 with the anticipation that it could be completed by fall the same year. Judging by the growing popularity of the Instagram hashtag #peckparkskatepark, Harris said, the plaza is destined to be a much -used attraction. With several contiguous bowls, the design has something for everyone, from beginners to experts, Harris said. It will become the 22nd skate nark built in the city of Los Angeles. "It's a lot more dynamic" than skate parks constructed in earlier eras, Harris said. "It's much more in line with the real top-notch skate parks in the Pacific Northwest." The original square footage, however, was pared down a bit from original plans, Harris said. Originally, he said, the idea was to make it a hybrid design with both bowl and sirectscape elements, such as rails and other structures characteristic of an urban street that draws skaters. "We lost some square footage, which was kind of a bummer," Harris said. "That made us change the design a little bit from a hybrid street -and -bowl design to pretty much just bowl skating." I Iarris thought that among the challenges in building the skate plaza at the site chosen by the city was the slight grade in the topography. The area where the plaza was built is on the far western perimeter of the rambling city park that features picnic areas, basketball courts, hiking trails, baseball diamonds, a gymnasium and an outdoor swimming pool. Craig Raines, the city landscape architect who oversaw much of the project, said the size wasn't changed by a significant amount, although the design was "tweaked." The plaza is about 8,000 square feet. Anticipating problems with tagging, city officials already have worked out a plan with Harris' group to provide needed supplies so users of the plaza will be responsible for painting out any graffiti that appears. San Pedro's only other skate park — under a freeway overpass at Channel Street — was constructed by skaters years ago with no formal approvals from either the city or the California Department of Transportation, which owns the property. That park is scheduled to close down temporarily this fall for a year -and -a -half so improvements can be made to the overpass. But Harris said it will reopen after that, with plans to apply for grant money to beautify the landscaping around the area. Financing for the new plaza at Peck Park came from city Quimby funds, fees collected from developers to provide more parks and open space. The'ronv Hawk Foundation also donated $27.000 toward the project, bringing with it recognition from the popular skateboarding legend. Tbc foundation will be on hand for the ribbon -cutting, Harris said, but it is not known whether Hawk will attend. I larris said skaters would love to see another plaza at perhaps Angels Gate Park or maybe along San Pedro's redeveloped waterfront, where some of the hoped-for urban streetscape elements could be incorporated. Despite the paring down of size in the original plans, region superintendent Mariscal said the plaza will be "one of our bigger" skate parks. About the Author http://www.dailybreeze.com/lifestyle/20140718/long-awaited-peck-park-skate-park-almost... 7/22/2014 147 7-29-14 CC Agenda Attachment: Skate Park Proposal Skate Park Site Analysis Criteria Skate Park Site Analysis Critieria As part of their preliminary research on potential skate park sites, ML+A consulting firm prepared a draft list of Skate Park Selection Critieria. ML+A noted that it was unlikely that any one site would match all of the criteria listed above. The following is a brief review of how SPV's proposal matches the criteria. Land Use 1) Compatible zoning and general plan designation: Discussed above. Site Conditions/Existing Use Compatibility 1) Adequate Space for 14,000-15, 000 sf minimum skate park and dimensions: SPV's design is preliminary and its precise dimensions have not been analyzed by staff. 2) Suitable soil and geology: Has not been studied for this particular proposal. 3) Does not damage natural or cultural resources: The proposed design would reduce the size of the existing grass area. 4) Does not displace an existing recreation element or program: The proposal could displace the sand volleyball court. SPV's proposal calls for them to relocate the court if necessary. 5) Minimal conflict with other users/activities: There is minimal activity in that area, except for cultural events such as the 4t" of July. SPV has stated that the skate plaza could be used for such events. 6) Flat to gentle, rolling topography: Yes, although significant grading would be required. 7) Positive drainage into natural or existing drainage system: Site currently drains properly. Drainage has not been studied for this particular proposal. 8) Appropriate surfaces (minimal demolition required): Yes. Location 1) Site centralized to where users congregate: Site is located at a public park, although site is not currently frequented by skateboarders. 2) Close to commercial and/or institutional activity: Located near to City Hall, Salvation Army, and the Golden Cove Shopping Mall. Accessibility 1) Existing bus access (near bus route or existing stop): yes 2) Skateboarding proximity to skate park: Steepness of Hawthorne Boulevard makes skateboard access difficult and raises concerns about the dangerous practice of high-speed "skate bombing" 3) Biking proximity: Hawthorne Boulevard is a popular, although strenuous bike route due to its steep incline. Me 4) Driving proximity to skate park: While not centrally located in the City, the site is easily accessible by car. 5) Proximity to a major arterial road: yes 6) Potential for auto drop-off yes 7) Site ADA compliant: ADA compliance would be a necessary factor in the design and construction of the skate plaza, parking space, restroom and other amenities Neighborhood Compatibility 1) Minimal conflict with neighborhood uses (e.g. avoiding noise and physical conflicts): The proposed site is not adjacent to any residences. Potential noise impacts have not been assessed. Night-time skating would not be permitted. 2) No obstruction of protected views. To be determined. The sunken design of the proposal would minimize view impact. SPV's proposal includes an approximately four -foot high wall above current grade. Impact on residents would likely be minimal, although view of arriving and departing motorist could be impacted. Health and Safety 1) Protected from major arterial roads: Yes 2) Emergency vehicle access: Yes 3) Maintenance crew accessibility: Yes 4) Good visibility for public surveillance and safety: Site is in open area of Point Vicente Park -visibility and lighting needs further review. 5) Restricted night access to vehicles to prevent skateboarding by car lights: Potential design concern, Point Vicente Park is currently accessible at night. 150 Carolynn Petru From: Siegenthaler, David <david-siegenthaler@nps.gov> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 4:50 PM To: Carolynn Petru Cc: Kit Fox; Cory Linder Subject: Re: FW: Proposal for Revised Location of 6.6 -Acre Active Recreation Area under the Program of Utilization for LADA Nike Site 55, Point Vicente, Rancho Palos Verdes (GSA No. 9 -Calif -D-1088) Hi Carolyn, We have reviewed your proposal to amend the Program of Utilization for Upper Point Vicente Park by relocating the planned approximately 6.6 -acre active recreation area from the northern section of the Park to areas that would include the existing tennis and volleyball courts, as well as areas designated in the City's 1976 application as parking and picnic areas. As I understand the situation, this change would move the designated "potential active recreational area" out of what has subsequently been designated by the City as nature preserve area, and place it instead in a previously disturbed area that is more suitable to active recreational use. According to the Program of Utilization, the designated passive recreational area will be developed with a network of trails, vista, and picnic areas, and the active recreation area will be developed with parking, tennis courts, picnic areas, and athletic field. Since your proposed change does not alter the original mixture of recreational opportunities planned for the park, and since the original Program of Utilization was approved with the understanding that subsequent site-specific planning would still be required, we concur that the proposal is consistent with the existing Program of Utilization. The City has not entirely completed implementing its Program of Utilization for the park. In addition, a non -conforming use in the form of an agricultural lease has continued on the property. Your map raises another question for us regarding the emergency helipad which is not an approved recreational facility. Given this history, I am wondering what is meant by saying that the relocation of the active recreation area would "provide the City with greater flexibility for the future use and development of the unrestricted portions of the park site." We understand the City is working toward finally fulfilling the program of utilization for Upper Point Vicente Park and you seem to be on the right track. We would like to be kept abreast of how the City plans to achieve it. Please let us know what your current plans are to bring the entire property into compliance with the terms of the conveyance. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, David i 151 David Siegenthaler Pacific West Region National Park Service 333 Bush Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94104-2828 V: 415-623-2334 F: 415-623-2387 Federal Lands to Parks Land and Water Conservation Fund Urban Park and Recreation Recovery Program National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Program Celebrating 50 years of the great 1964 Acts Civil Rights Act • Land and Water Conservation Fund Act • Wilderness Act And the 150 Year Anniversary of the National Park Idea (Yosemite) • California State Parks (Yosemite) • Federal Lands to Parks Idea (Yosemite) On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Carolynn Petru <CarolynnkKpv.com> wrote: 1.1i David -- It's been a little while, so I wanted to follow up with you regarding Kit's email below and my attached letter. The proposal to relocate the designated active recreation area on LADA Nike Site 55 is a follow up to the telephone conversation we had back. in December 2013. In the meantime, the City Council has directed staff to update our 'arks Master Plan, which includes Point Vicente Park. In an effbrt to keep the project moving forward, I would very much appreciate your written concurrence with this proposal. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please feel fee to contact me at (310) 544-5203. Best regards, = Carolvnn Petru Acting City Manager 152 City of Rancho Palos Verdes From: Kit Fox Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 2:43 PM To: David Siegenthaler (David Siegenthalernnps.gov) Ce: Carolynn Petru; Cory Linder Subject: Proposal for Revised Location of 6.6 -Acre Active Recreation Area under the Program of Utilization for LADA Nike Site 55, Point Vicente, Rancho Palos Verdes (GSA No. 9 -Calif -D-1088) Hi David: As you may recall, last December Carolynn Petru, Cory Linder and I spoke with you about the possibility of relocating the designated 6.6 -acre active recreation area of Point Vicente Park from the lower portion for the site to the upper area, so as to be located closer to existing park facilities and improvements. Attached, please find a letter and exhibits depicting the City's proposal for the relocation of this active recreation area. The proposed active recreation area shown on the attached exhibits has been scaled on the City's GIS to measure 6.6 acres. We would approve your written concurrence with this proposal. I'll be out of the office for a few days, but you may contact Carolynn or Cory in my absence if you have any questions. I'll be back in town on July 16tH Sincerely, Kit Fox, AICD Senior Administrative Analvist Citic Manager's Office Citi] of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 1(310) 5445226 153 F. (310) 5445291 E: kitfgWv.com 154