RPVCCA_CC_SR_2015_06_16_I_2015_Five_Year_CIPMEMORANDUM
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM:
DEBORAH CULLEN, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE:
JUNE 16, 2015
SUBJECT:
2015 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
REVIEWED:
DOUG WILLMORE, CITY MANAGER
Project Manager:
Allan Kaufman, Senior Administrative Analyst
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the 2015 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The CIP is a guide for the efficient and effective provision of resources for improving
and maintaining public infrastructure and facilities. The CIP is segregated into both
Funded and Unfunded projects and includes detailed "project sheets" that provide a
project description, project type (e.g. Roadway Infrastructure), location, department
responsible, estimates of cost, and the justification (e.g. safety, City Council goal,
outside funding available). The CIP document does not include any projects with
estimated costs below the infrastructure capitalization threshold of $100,000.
Although the CIP document presents project funding for five years, the City Council
approves CIP projects for the upcoming fiscal year only. This gives the City Council the
ability to shift priorities when needed, while at the same time identify future projects and
potential funding mechanisms.
Projects are generally added to the "Funded" list as available funding sources are
identified. Projects are usually funded first from restricted funds, to be conservative in
allocating General Fund monies only when necessary. Staff recommends planning for
use of the CIP Reserve (funded with General Fund money equivalent to transient
occupancy tax revenue and prior year favorable General Fund expenditure variance in
accordance with City Council Policy No. 41 — Reserve Policies).
ii
2015 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 16, 2015
Page 2of3
On May 26, 2015, the Planning Commission reviewed the CIP Document and adopted
P.C. Resolution 2015-10, finding it to be consistent with the General Plan.
Based on City Council direction on June 2, 2016, the following changes have been
made to the 2015 CIP:
• Civic Center Tennis Court and Skate Plaza projects were combined and moved
to the Unfunded list;
• ADA Improvement Project at Del Cerro and Burma Road was removed from the
CIP;
• Fiber Optic Cabling at Abalone Cove Sewer Lift Stations, Abalone Shoreline
Park, and Ladera Linda Community Center was removed from the CIP; and
• Funding for the Hawthorne Boulevard Corridor Beautification Study was moved
from year 5 to year 1
The CIP list of "funded" projects (totaling $34.9 million) has been integrated into the
2015 Five -Year Financial Model.
Projects listed in Year 1 of the CIP (table below), totaling $3.2 million have been
included in the proposed FY15-16 budget, which is also on the June 16, 2015 agenda
for City Council consideration.
Projects
Page
FY15-16
Landslide Dewatering Well Program
15
$
450,000
Citywide ADA Transition Plan Implementation
20
200,000
PVIC Exhibits
24
455,000
'Traffic Safety Improvements - PVDE at Bronco
32
500,300
Hawthorne Blvd Corridor Beautification Study (Phase 1)
35
150,000
Pavement Management Program Update
36
120,000
Regional Storm Water Quality Project
44
100,000
Subtotal Capital Improvement Projects Fund
$
1,975,300
Storm Drain Lining
41
$
340,836
Storm Drain Point Repairs
42
900,000
Subtotal Water Quality Flood Protection Fund
$
1;240,836
Total Capital Spending
$
3,216,136
Note: The Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan includes only projects with cost
estimates of $100,000 or more.
Summary of Resources Used for Funding Capital Spending; FY15-16
Use of CIP & General Fund resources $ 1,020,030
Use of restricted funds and revenue 2,196,106
Total Resources Used to fund Capital Spending $ 3,216,136
K
2015 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 16, 2015
Page 3 of 3
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Programming capital facilities and improvements over time can promote better use of
the City's limited financial resources, reduce costs and assist in the coordination of
public and private development. Based on guidelines of the framework and those set
forth by the City Council, Staff developed an inventory of capital projects. This inventory
was compiled through a comprehensive review of existing reports, infrastructure plans,
community input and the City Council's direction, goals and priorities. Some of these
plans include the following: the Pavement Management System, Vision Plan, Sanitary
Sewer Master Plan, Public Use Master Plan, Trails Network Plan, Storm Drain Master
Plan and the General Plan.
Staff evaluated every project quantified during the establishment and update of the CIP
and established Criteria justifications that are reflected on each project sheet. These
justification categories include: safety, support of essential City services, support of
Council plan goals, economy and efficiency, outside funding, and community
quality/sustainability. The Criteria justifications and the availability of restricted (non -
General Fund) monies, are utilized to establish the priority level of CIP projects. Staff
has included columns on the Funded and Unfunded lists (pages 11 & 68 of the
document) to indicate whether the project supports public safety or another City Council
priority.
Expected Additions to Future CIP Documents
Staff anticipates there will be future factors in 2015 and 2016 that will drive additional
projects to the CIP, namely:
1. Completion of the Storm Drain Master Plan is expected in 2015,
2. Draft Parks Master Plan will be presented to the City Council on June 30, 2015;
and
3. Update of the City's General Plan is expected to be finalized in FY15-16.
Attachment:
2015 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (page 4)
3
Ago
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
FUNDED PROJECTS 10
FIVE YEAR CIP FUNDED LIST 11
ABALONE COVE SEWER DISTRICT REHABILITATION 12
PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH LANDSLIDE 14
PARK SITES 16
PUBLIC BUILDINGS 19
RIGHT OF WAY 25
SANITARY SEWERS 37
STORM WATER SYSTEM 40
UNFUNDED PROJECTS 45
UNFUNDED LIST 46
PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH LANDSLIDE 47
PARK SITES 49
PUBLIC BUILDINGS 55
RIGHT OF WAY 59
STORM WATER SYSTEM 70
TRAILS 76
KA
5
INTRODUCTION
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a guide toward the efficient and effective provision of public
infrastructure and facilities. Programming capital facilities and improvements over time can
promote better use of the City's limited financial resources, reduce costs, and assist in the
coordination of public and private development. In addition, the planning process is valuable as a
means of coordinating and taking advantage of joint planning and development of facilities and
infrastructure where possible. Careful management of these assets keeps the City poised for
flexible and responsive strategic planning that allows the City to proactively prepare the groundwork
for capital projects so that when funding opportunities arise, a plan is ready to be implemented. By
looking beyond year-to-year budgeting and projecting what, where, when and how capital
investments should be made, capital planning enables public organizations to maintain an effective
level of service for the present and future population.
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP)
The result of this continuing planning process is the CIP, which is the City's mid-term plan for
infrastructure projects. The CIP addresses the City's needs relating to the acquisition, expansion,
and rehabilitation of facilities and infrastructure. The CIP serves as a planning instrument, in
conjunction with the City's General Plan and the City Council's Goals, to identify needed capital
projects and coordinate the financing and timing of improvements in a way that maximizes the
return to the public. It provides a planned systematic approach to utilizing the City's limited financial
resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service and infrastructure needs.
It serves as the "blueprint" for the future of the community and is a management and planning tool,
rather than a binding document.
The underlying strategy of the CIP is to plan for necessary land acquisition, construction and
maintenance of public facilities necessary for the safe and efficient provision of public services in
accordance with City policies and objectives adopted in the City's General Plan. A critical element
of a balanced CIP is the provision of funds to both preserve or enhance existing facilities and
provide new assets to respond to changing needs and community growth. While the program
serves as a mid-term plan, it is reviewed and revised annually in conjunction with the budget.
Priorities may be changed due to funding opportunities or circumstances that propel a project to a
higher level of importance. Along the way, projects may be revised for significant cost variances.
The CIP is primarily a document that assists in addressing the City's mid-term needs. As such, the
projects and their scopes are subject to change from year-to-year as the needs of the community
become more defined and projects move closer to final implementation. The adoption of the CIP
is neither a commitment to a particular project nor a limitation to a particular cost. As a basic tool
for scheduling anticipated capital projects, it is also a key element in controlling future capital
financing. For this reason, the CIP includes some "unfunded" projects in which needs have been
identified and quantified, but specific solutions and funding sources have not been determined.
When adopted, the CIP provides the framework for the City's management team and the City
Council with respect to investment planning, project planning, and the managing of any City debt.
This document is independent of the City Council's goals and is intended to serve as a mid-term
planning document.
An integrated infrastructure management plan (IMP) is scheduled to be developed in FY15-16 to
determine the impact of different funding strategies/scenarios and prioritization on project delivery
over the course of multiple planning decades. The IMP will consider the maintenance level required
and the useful life for each public asset and will focus particularly on the community's current and
future needs (including public safety and regulatory mandates) and community expectations.
The City is currently engaged in updating the General Plan, the 1989 Parks Master Plan and the
2004 Storm Drainage Master Plan, which are expected to be adopted in FY15-16. These three
master plans will heavily influence the scheduling of projects during the CIP process.
3
10
A City Council -appointed Infrastructure Management Advisory Committee (IMAC) was formed in
FY14-15 to assist in the implementation of the IMP and the use of the infrastructure planning tool.
THE CIP PROCESS
The capital improvement plan and budget is the result of an ongoing infrastructure planning
process. Infrastructure planning decisions must be made with regard to both existing and new
facilities and equipment. For existing facilities, the planning process addresses appropriate capital
renewal strategies and repair -versus -replacement of facilities. New service demands are also
considered, since they often affect capital facility requirements. Planning for the five-year CIP
period and subsequent years, includes linking the General Plan to the capital plan requirements,
conducting needs assessments and allowing for flexibility to take advantage of opportunities for
capital investment. The FY15-16 through FY19-20 CIP is developed through input from
professional staff, citizens of Rancho Palos Verdes, and elected or appointed City officials.
CIP REVIEW TEAM
A CIP Review Team is responsible for annually reviewing capital project requests and providing
recommendations to the City Manager. This team is comprised of staff from the Office of the City
Manager, Finance, Public Works, Community Development, and Recreation and Parks
Departments, and the City Attorney. This team conducts an in-depth analysis of the impact of the
CIP on present and future cash flows and financial obligations, as well as the City's ability to
finance, process, design, and ultimately maintain projects. The Team will also analyze the fiscal
impact for each individual project; including future maintenance and replacement costs, associated
monetary benefits (e.g. future maintenance savings), as well as any applicable future revenue
opportunities. The Team meets periodically throughout the year to evaluate the progress of
projects, and examine future needs of the City.
The overall goal of the CIP Review Team is to develop CIP recommendations that:
■ Preserve the past by investing in the continued upgrade of City assets and infrastructure;
■ Protect the present with improvements to City facilities and infrastructure; and
■ Plan for the future.
Projects are identified by staff, professional consultants, residents and/or elected officials. There
are typically more proposals than can be funded in the five-year CIP period, so the team conducts
an internal project ranking process. The criteria used in this internal ranking includes, but is not
limited to, safety, support of essential City services, support of City Council's goals, economy and
efficiency, outside funding committed (or eligible for), and community quality/sustainability.
Projects are prioritized based on the criteria outlined in this plan in the following section. If a project
receives a lower ranking, it just means that other projects in that period of time are more critical for
the City to address. While ratings are important in determining recommended projects, the realities
of the City's financial situation are critical to all decisions.
CIP CRITERIA
Safety: Enhance or improve the overall safety of the City and delivery of services. Protect the
health and welfare of residents.
Supports Essential City Services: Maintenance and development of existing or new facilities and
infrastructure which allows the City to deliver essential services to residents of Rancho Palos
Verdes.
Supports City Council Goals: Supports the goals established annually by the City Council. Meets
citywide long-term goals and is in compliance with the City's General Plan.
Economy and Efficiency: Maintain and enhance the economy and efficiency of providing services
in Rancho Palos Verdes. This criterion would include projects which improve business processes
and overall efficiency while also evaluating environmental impacts.
Il
7
Outside Funding Committed or Eligible: Support a project for which outside funding has been
committed to or may be obtained through restricted revenue sources.
Community Quality/Sustainability: Maintain and enhance the infrastructure and services which
support our residential and business community. This criterion would include projects which
preserve and enhance the overall quality of life in Rancho Palos Verdes and projects which ensure
economic viability to support the community.
THE CIP CALENDAR
October -December Departments prepare CIP requests
January CIP Review Team reviews requests
February -May Recommendations developed to be included in the Five -Year
Model and Draft Budget
May -June Planning Commission Review
May -June Recommendations presented to the City Council for approval
Additional forms and methods of public outreach will be conducted as directed by the City
Council.
PROJECT LISTS
The CIP includes a comprehensive listing of all projects contained in the Five -Year Plan and also
projects beyond the five-year period. Detailed project sheets are contained in the Plan for all
projects included in the CIP. Another list of unfunded projects is also contained in the Plan to
highlight quantified projects beyond the five-year period. Projects which are included in the CIP
were evaluated based on the criteria approved by the City Council and are in compliance with the
goals set forth in the City's General Plan. Application of these criteria ensures that each project
recommended for Council consideration does indeed support the policy objectives of the City's
long-term planning documents and identifies a basis for scheduling and allocation of resources.
Cost estimates have been developed for each project based on preliminary project descriptions,
and include all estimated costs for land acquisition, permits and inspections, project management
and project engineering, consultant design work, construction, utilities, information technology
infrastructure and other associated project costs. Estimates are based on today's dollars.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT POLICIES
The Finance Department, in cooperation with all other City Departments and the City Attorney,
shall produce a working document designed to identify capital needs annually in conjunction with
the budget process. This Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is submitted to the City Council
to utilize in reviewing and prioritizing capital projects. After adoption by the City Council during the
budget process, the CIP becomes the City's plan for capital improvements for the next five years,
with annual adjustments as needed.
Type of Project
Definitions
Capital asset: An asset with a cost in excess of $5,000 and an expected useful life of more than
one year, such as automobiles, equipment, and furniture. These items will continue to be included
in the operating budget. Items such as automobiles, minor equipment, and furniture will continue
5
•
to be accounted for and funded using the Equipment Replacement Fund and are not included in
the capital improvement plan.
Capital project: A project expected to have a useful life greater than ten years and an estimated
cost of $100,000 or more. Capital projects include the construction, acquisition, or major renovation
of buildings, roadways, utility systems, or other structures, purchase of land, and major landscaping
projects.
Projects meeting the above definition will be included in the CIP document in addition to the City's
budget document. The information will be tied to the capital budget and totals for each project in
the CIP will be included in the capital budget.
Selecting the Projects for the CIP
The comprehensive capital project planning process has the following essential components:
■ The General Plan (Long-term Plan - 10 Years)
■ The Capital Improvement Plan (Mid-term Plan - 5 Years)
■ The Capital Budget (Short-term Plan - 1 Year)
■ City Council Goals (Long-term and Short-term evaluated each year)
All projects selected for the CIP should be consistent with the goals identified by the City Council
or as outlined in the City's General Plan. The project selection process strives to achieve a
balanced plan for the community to include all necessary and high priority projects, while also
enhancing City services and facilities.
Operating Budget Impact Identified in the CIP
The operating impact of proposed capital projects, including personnel, operating expenditures,
capital outlay, and debt service, as applicable, will be identified in the CIP document and considered
in preparing the annual operating budget and Five -Year Financial Model.
Moving Projects from the CIP to the Capital Budget
All projects approved in the annual capital budget are appropriated at the estimated cost to
complete the project. At the end of each fiscal year, the remaining appropriation for uncompleted
portions of the project will be carried forward to subsequent fiscal years.
Staff will identify the estimated costs, potential funding sources, operating impact, and project
schedule for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to the City Council.
Staff will coordinate development of the capital improvement budget with the development of the
operating budget. All costs for internal professional services needed to implement the CIP will be
included in the capital budget as part of the budget document for the years the CIP is to be
implemented.
Cost tracking for components of the capital improvement program will be updated semi-annually to
ensure project completion against budget and established time lines.
Funding of the CIP Reserve Fund
City Council Policy No. 41 regarding the City's Reserves provides for a minimum CIP Reserve level
of $3,000,000 for emergency projects, the transfer of the total annual Transient Occupancy Tax
(TOT) revenue into the CIP Reserve, and the transfer of any prior year General Fund favorable
expenditure variance to the CIP Reserve. The TOT revenue for FY15-16 is estimated to be about
$5.0 million.
Definition of Capital Budget Year
A capital budget year runs concurrent to the operating budget fiscal year beginning July 1St and
ending June 301h
n.
N
Types of Financing
The nature and cost of the project generally determines the financing options as do projected
revenue. The following financing instruments could be used in the following preferred order:
■ Outside funding that does not require repayment, including grants, federal, state and
county restricted funding (i.e. transportation funding), and donations;
■ Developer Fees;
■ City restricted revenue imposed by voters (i.e. environmental excise tax, storm drain user
fee);
■ Accumulated Fund Balances in Restricted Funds;
■ General Fund;
■ Debt Secured by a Restricted Revenue Source; and
■ General Obligation Debt.
Application of Restricted Funding Sources
It is the City's policy to apply restricted funding sources after a project is completed and final cost
is identified, or at the close of each fiscal year, whichever occurs first.
Evaluation of Capital Projects
Capital project and program reviews are to monitor existing project performance and to update the
Five -Year CIP. Each project must be actively managed and semi-annual reports on the physical
and fiscal status of each project should be made available to the City Council in conjunction with
the budget adoption and Mid -Year Financial Review.
Green Building Standards
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes requires the incorporation of green building principles and
practices into the design, construction, and operation of all City facilities, and to evaluate all land
purchases for future development on the basis of reducing environmental impacts whenever
feasible.
Standards for Maintenance
It is important to have standards in place for the various infrastructure systems throughout the City
to maintain this investment and be positioned to provide adequate services for the residents of
Rancho Palos Verdes. Staff will develop maintenance standards and schedules as appropriate.
Contingency Policy
The need for contingencies will be evaluated with each project and be included in the CIP on a
case-by-case basis.
Project Change Orders
Project change orders will be made in accordance with the policy stated in Section 02.44 of the
Municipal Code.
GENERAL PLAN GOALS
The goals stated below are included in the City's General Plan which serves as the City's long-term
strategic planning tool. All CIP projects should contribute to fulfilling one or more of the goals listed
below.
Natural Environment Element
■ It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect, and enhance its
natural resources, beauty, and open space for the benefit and enjoyment of its residents
and the residents of the entire region. Future development shall recognize the sensitivity
of the natural environmental and be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the
protection of it.
7
Socio/Cultural Element
■ It is the goal of the City to preserve and protect its cultural resources and to promote
programs to meet the social needs of its citizens.
Cultural Resources
■ The City shall strive to protect and preserve all significant archaeological, paleontological
and historical resources within the City.
Current Social, Service, and Cultural Organizations
■ Work toward a coordinated program to aid in matching the facility needs of the many and
diverse groups in the community with existing and future facility resources throughout the
City.
Social Services
■ Encourage programs for community involvement, participation, and action to minimize the
sense of isolation and powerlessness felt by many individuals in the community.
■ Encourage programs for recreation, social services, and cultural and educational
achievement.
■ Encourage a framework for interaction among the four cities on the peninsula and between
the peninsula and its surrounding communities to solve common problems.
Urban Environment Element
■ It is the goal of the City to carefully control and direct future growth towards making a
positive contribution to all elements of the community. Growth in Rancho Palos Verdes
should be a cautious, evolutionary process that follows a well -conceived set of general
guidelines, which respond to both holding capacity limitations for the region and
environmental factors on the peninsula.
Activity Areas
■ It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to preserve and enhance the community's
quality living environment; to enhance the visual character and physical quality of existing
neighborhoods; and to encourage the development of housing in a manner which
adequately serves the needs of all present and future residents of the community.
■ The City shall discourage industrial and major commercial activities due to the terrain and
environmental characteristics of the City. Commercial development shall be carefully and
strictly controlled and limited to consideration of convenience or neighborhood service
facilities.
■ The City shall encourage the development of institutional facilities to serve the political,
social, and cultural needs of its citizens.
■ The City shall endeavor to provide, develop, and maintain recreational facilities and
programs of various types to provide a variety of activities for persons of all age groups
and in all areas of the community.
■ Agricultural uses within the City shall be encouraged, since they are desirable for resource
management and open space.
Infrastructure
■ It shall be a goal of the City to ensure adequate public utilities and communications services
to all residents, while maintaining the quality of the environment.
R
11
■ It shall be a goal of the City to provide residents with a safe and efficient system of roads,
trails, and paths.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to encourage the increased mobility of residents through the
development of an adequate public transportation system.
Safety
■ It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of life and property from both
natural and man-made hazards within the community.
• It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of the public through effective law
enforcement and fire protection programs.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to develop and enforce health and sanitation, emergency
communications, and disaster preparedness programs to ensure the overall health and
safety of all residents.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to protect life and property and reduce adverse economic,
environmental, and social impacts resulting from any geologic activity.
Sensory Environment
■ It shall be the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, through proper land use planning
and regulations, to provide for a quiet and serene residential community with a minimum
amount of restriction on citizen activity.
Palos Verdes peninsula is graced with views and vistas of the surrounding Los Angeles
basin and coastal region. Because of its unique geographic form and coastal resources,
these views and vistas are a significant resource to residents and visitors, as they provide
a rare means of experiencing the beauty of the peninsula and the Los Angeles region. It
is the responsibility of the City to preserve these views and vistas for the public benefit and,
where appropriate, the City should strive to enhance and restore these resources, the
visual character of the City, and provide and maintain access for the benefit and enjoyment
of the public.
Land Use Plan
■ It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to provide for land uses which will be
sensitive to and enhance the natural environment and character of the community, supply
appropriate facilities to serve residents and visitors, promote a range of housing types,
promote fiscal balance, and protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the
community.
Fiscal Element
• It shall be a goal of the City to hold the property tax to a minimum and to continually explore
and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of alternate or new sources of revenue.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to explore cooperative financing strategies that might be
undertaken in association with other jurisdictions.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to take maximum advantage of regulatory legislation to obtain
contributions, dedications, and reservations (i.e., easements).
■ It shall be a goal of the City to ascertain that all revenues generated by growth are sufficient
to cover costs related to growth.
• It shall be a goal of the City to thoroughly evaluate capital acquisition and operating
expenditures and their impacts before implementation of programs.
p
12
FUNDED PROJECTS
The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs
through various planning processes along with a proposed funding source.
Because the City Council approves CIP projects for the upcoming year, proposed
funding sources could change in subsequent years.
13
Palos Verdes Five Year Capital Safety Council Identified Funding
umentPlan- Funded Projects Page Goal Priority FYIS-16 FY16.17 FY17.18 FY18.19 FY19.20 Source
Abalone Cove Sewer District Rehabilitation
13
X
X
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000 CIP Reserve
Palos Verdes Drive South Landslide
X
X
$ 407,000
CIP Reserve
Storm Water System'
Landslide Dewatering Well Program
15
X
X
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000 CIP Reserve
Park Sites
WQFP User Fees/CIP
Storm Drain Lining
41
X
X
Abalone Cove Beach Access Road
17
X
Reserve
Paintbrush Canyon Drainage Project Study Report
$ 100,000
X
X
CIPReserve
Grandview Parklmprovements (Phase 1)
18
CIP Reserve
X
43
X
X
$ 635,000
CIPReserve
Public Buildings
WQFP User Fees
Storm Water Quality Improvement Program
44
$ 100,000
$ 100,000 $ 100,000
$ 100,000 $ 100,000
Ctyw ide ADA Transition Plan Implementation
20
X
$ 200,000
$ 150,000
$ 150,000
$ 150,000
$ 150,000 EEfICIPReserve
Ladera Linda Community Center Improvements
21
X
$ 4,000,000
CIPReserve
Solar Power System Hesse Park
22
$ 385,000
Energy Savings Grant
Solar Power System PVIC
23
$ 410,000
Energy Savings Grant
Restricted Donations
PVIC Exhibits
24
$ 455,000
Fund
Right of Way
General Fund, TDA
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 7
26
X
X
$2,282,000
Article 3 funds
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 8
27
X
X
$ 2,200,000
General Fund
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 3 & 4
28
X
X
$ 2,100,000
General Fund
General Fund, TDA
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 5
29
X
X
$2,182,000 Article 3 funds
Measure R, Prop A,
Prop C, STPL, CIP
Arterial Rehabilitation - Crenshaw Boulevard
30
X
X
$ 200,000
$ 2,600,000
Reserve
Measure R, Prop A,
Prop C, STPD, CIP
Arterial Rehabilitation - IndianPeakRoad
31
X
X
$ 200,000
$1,600,000 Reserve
HSIP 90%, CIP Reserve
Traffic Safety Improvements - PVDEat Bronco
32
X
X
$ 500,300
10%
PVDS Road Way Realignment and Drainage Project
33
X
X
$ 3,060,000
CIPReserve
50/50 Inter -Agency Cost
Western Avenue Traffic Improvements
34
X
X
$3,200,000
Share/CIPReserve
Hawthorne Blvd Corridor Beautification Study (Phase 1)
35
X
X
$ 150,000
CIPReserve
Pavement Management Program Update
36
X
X
$ 120,000
$ 120,000
CIPReserve
Sanitary Sewer
Sewer Capacity Project- Other Locations
38
X
X
$ 465,000
CIP Reserve
Malaga Canyon - Sew er Improvement
39
X
X
$ 407,000
CIP Reserve
Storm Water System'
WQFP User Fees/CIP
Storm Drain Lining
41
X
X
$ 340,836
$ 347,653 $ 350,000
$ 350,000 $ 350,000
Reserve
Paintbrush Canyon Drainage Project Study Report
42
X
X
$ 120,000
CIP Reserve
Storm Drain Point Repairs
43
X
X
$ 900,000
WQFP User Fees
Storm Water Quality Improvement Program
44
$ 100,000
$ 100,000 $ 100,000
$ 100,000 $ 100,000
CIPReserve
Totals !
$3,216,136
-$8,686,653 $,6,490,000
$11,396,000 .$6,182,000
11
M
ABALONE COVE SEWER
The Abalone Cove Sewer Maintenance District is a unique system serving 110
developed parcels in an active landslide area, and is maintained by the City.
Sewer user fees are collected from property owners, but are not sufficient to
provide for maintenance and rehabilitation of the system. The Abalone Cove
Sewer Maintenance District is heavily subsidized by the City.
12
15
PROJECT:
ABALONE COVE SEWER DISTRICT
REHABILITATION
TYPE:
Sewer System
LOCATION:
Abalone Cove Sewer District
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Construction of the Abalone Cove Sewer system was completed in
2001 to replace property owner's septic tanks in the active landslide
area of the City. Minimal maintenance has been performed since
that time. Due to the active landslide, the system is now in need of
more substantive rehabilitation and upgrades to comply with current
engineering, operations, and maintenance standards in Los
Angeles County.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Rehabilitation of the system will result in reliable system performance and compliance with state requirements.
This is expected to decrease maintenance costs.
13
16
PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH LANDSLIDE PROJECTS
The Palos Verdes Drive South Landslide Projects refers to projects that lessen the
effect of erosion on the Portuguese Bend Landslide, which is the only continuously
active landslide in the United States. These projects are intended to address
landslide movement and public safety risks by using proven methods, such as
runoff diversion, dewatering, and geospatial monitoring.
14
i1h
PROJECT:
INSTALLATION OF LANDSLIDE
DEWATERING WELLS
TYPE:
Landslide Project
LOCATION:
Portuguese Bend and Abalone Cove
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Dewatering wells are considered to be one of the most effective
methods of minimizing runoff from entering the landslide, which
helps slow land movement within the landslide area. All runoff that
percolates into the ground eventually becomes part of the
groundwater and will cause an increase in the depth of the
groundwater table. Removing groundwater through dewatering
wells helps to lower the groundwater table, relieving soil pressures
at depth and minimizing the negative effects groundwater has on
the landslide. These new wells should improve the system's
effectiveness by increasing the system's water removal capacity
and by removing water more rapidly. The cost to install each well
is estimated to be $90,000.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$450,000 $450,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$450,000 $450,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Maintenance costs will be performed as needed.
15
im•
PARK SITES
The development and maintenance of community parks, recreational areas, and
open space has been established as a top priority for the City, as stated in the
General Plan and various other planning documents. The General Plan states,
"It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect, and
enhance its natural resources, beauty, and open space for the benefit and
enjoyment of its residents and the residents of the entire region. Future
development shall recognize the sensitivity of the natural environment and
be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the protection of it."
Many park sites and open space areas have been acquired throughout the City,
and some have been developed for use by the general public. Some sites remain
vacant or underutilized. The City Council approved the Vision Plan in September
2008 which outlines various trail and park projects, which have been included in
this plan. The Public Use Master Plan has also outlined a strategy for the
development of trails. These recreational projects add to the vibrancy of the
community and are designed to contribute to all residents' quality of life. Parks
and other open spaces have been carefully planned to take advantage of the
beautiful coastline and natural landscape of the peninsula.
At its July 29, 2014 meeting, the City Council directed staff to complete an update
of the City's 1989 Parks Master Plan. This update is intended to provide a
comprehensive strategy for addressing the future use of the City's parks,
recreation and open space resources. The updated Master Plan will serve as a
long-range vision for the City's recreation opportunities within a flexible framework
than can be adapted to changes in technology, demographics, economics, and
shifting recreational trends. The draft Parks Master Plan is scheduled to be
presented to the City Council on June 30, 2015.
The update will consolidate plans that currently exist for a number of major park
sites, while being consistent and in compliance with the City's General Plan and
other guiding documents. A review and update of the City's parks inventory will be
a major element as well as an update of the Coast Vision Plan. A dozen public
workshops were conducted between November 2014 and February 2015, in
addition to an online survey which generated over 500 responses.
The Parks Master Plan's precise impact to the CIP is not known at this time. A
number of projects that will likely be part of the final Master Plan document are
probably already part of the current CIP's funded or unfunded categories, while
other recommended projects may not reach the CIP threshold.
W
W
PROJECT: ABALONE COVE BEACH ACCESS
ROAD
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Abalone Cove
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
The Abalone Cove Beach access road from PVDS to the beachfront
DESCRIPTION: must be re -graded and re -paved to improve accessibility for
emergency response and maintenance vehicles.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
Maintenance will require new slurry seal every eight (8) years.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The life expectancy of the access road should last approximately 20 years.
17
20
PROJECT:
GRANDVIEW PARK IMPROVEMENTS
(PHASE 1)
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks & Open Space
LOCATION:
Grandview Park
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The scope of work of the proposed 'Phase One' of Grandview
Park includes construction of a natural parking lot,
restrooms/office, play area, picnic area, and some landscaping.
These basic items are chosen from the concept plan option
"Sycamore", which was selected by the City Council.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$75,000
CONSTRUCTION
$560,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$635,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
Impacts to operating budget include: periodic parking lot maintenance ($10,000 /yr.), facility services
($3,000 /yr.), and trash collection ($4,000).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
ff.*]
21
PUBLIC BUILDINGS
Buildings and other facility improvements may include any proposed new City
facility or renovation or improvement of any existing City facilities. The City owns
and maintains the following public buildings:
■ City Hall Administration Building at Point Vicente Park
■ City Hall Community Development Building at Point Vicente Park
■ RPV TV Studio Building at Point Vicente Park
■ City Hall trailer leased by Palos Verdes on the Net at Point Vicente Park
■ City Hall Emergency Communications Center trailer at Point Vicente Park
■ Fred Hesse Jr. Community Center Building (John C. McTaggart Hall)
■ Pointe Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC) at Lower Point Vicente Park
■ Robert Ryan Park Building
■ Ladera Linda Community Center Buildings (5)
■ Buildings at Abalone Cove Shoreline Park, currently used for staffing, public
restrooms, and a nursery school on the beach.
■ Pelican Cove Restroom Building
■ Eastview Park Restroom Buildings
Except for PVIC, these buildings are 25 years old or more and showing signs of
daily use. Many of the facilities were purchased from the school district or
transferred to the City from the federal government. In some cases, little to no
improvements have been made since their acquisition. It is important to perform
adequate maintenance to extend the life of these facilities. It will be necessary to
renovate these buildings as they age to meet the needs of the community and
ensure that all building and safety guidelines are satisfied. PVIC, the most recently
remodeled City facility, was built in 1984 and expanded in 2005. The City Hall
buildings and Ladera Linda Community Center buildings are the best examples of
buildings that are in great need of renovation to meet organizational needs, comply
with safety and code requirements, and comply with all Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) guidelines. The projects listed on the following pages have been
developed based on individual staff assessments, input from the community, and
professional consultants' assessments and studies.
19
P
PROJECT:
CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Various
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
These projects include improvements identified in the Citywide ADA
Transition Plan. The projects for any given year are selected based
on public need and on the degree of severity reported in the ADA
compliance report prepared in 2013.
Project examples would include: accessibility path to Hesse Park
Community Center building; installation of new audible signals at
crosswalks; and building concrete ramps at crosswalks.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$17,500 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
CONSTRUCTION
$182,500 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$200,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Source: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money) and Environmental Excise Tax.
These projects are not expected to have any impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
20
23
21
24
LADERA LINDA PARK & COMMUNITY
PROJECT:
CENTER BUILDINGS REPLACEMENT
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Ladera Linda Park / Community Center
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
The initial stage of this project, for which a budget has been
established, is to create a master plan which will lay the groundwork
for the site's long-term redevelopment and phased implementation.
This stage involves a study of community needs through public
outreach, along with contemplating the City's needs for public service
facilities. This work will be followed by programming, quantifying the
needs, planning and preparing a feasibility report to create a master
plan, which can be phased for design and construction.
The cost calculation for the Ladera Linda Buildings Replacement
project is based on an estimated need for 12,000 square -feet of
DESCRIPTION:
buildings to replace the existing 18,000 square -feet. The anticipated
square -footage could include park restrooms, a staff building,
multipurpose room, activity rooms, discovery room, and a Park
Ranger/Deputy Sheriff drop-in office. Other improvements include
park grounds landscaping and irrigation, picnic tables, benches, and
an emergency generator. The project can be divided into three
phases. The first phase will include hazmat abatement, removal of all
buildings, installation of all utility infrastructures, the construction of
6,000 SF of new building space, park grounds, landscaping and other
improvements. The second and third phase will include 3,000 SF of
new buildings space.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF
KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$4,000,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$4,000,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
Phase 1- $4 million in CIP Reserves
Phase II - $1.6 million in CIP Reserves
Phase III - $1.6 million in CIP Reserves
Total Cost: $7.2 million
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Current maintenance costs would cease. As the new facility ages, maintenance costs will rise.
21
24
PROJECT:
SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR HESSE
PARK BUILDING
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Hesse Park
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating
systems over the roof of Hesse Park to reduce power consumption,
with occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid. This project will
help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce considerable
amounts of emissions. Typically, the energy savings can cover the
cost of projects of this scale over an estimated period of 15 to 20
years.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$35,000
CONSTRUCTION
$350,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$385,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: Fully funded with an Energy Savings grant (federal/state)
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Potential electricity savings is about $18,000 annually. The life of the system is expected to be 20-25 years.
Solar system components are generally under warranty for 10-12 years.
22
25
PROJECT:
SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR POINT
VICENTE INTERPRETIVE CENTER
(PVIC)
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
PVIC
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating
systems over the roof of PVIC to reduce power consumption, with
occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid. This project will
help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce
considerable amounts of emissions. Typically, the energy savings
can cover the cost of projects of this scale over an estimated period
of 15 to 20 years.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$35,000
CONSTRUCTION
$375,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$410,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding: Fully funded with an Energy Savings
grant (federal/state)
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Potential electricity savings is about $20,000 annually. The life of the system is expected to be 20-25 years.
Solar system components are generally under warranty for 10-12 years.
23
26
PROJECT:
POINT VICENTE INTERPRETIVE
CENTER EXHIBITS
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION:
Point Vicente Interpretive Center
DEPARTMENT:
Recreation & Parks/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Private restricted donations have been collected for enhancements
to the PVIC museum exhibits.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$455,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$455,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: Private Restricted Donations. Exhibit maintenance will be at a nominal cost; and therefore,
should not impact the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
24
27
RIGHT OF WAY PROJECTS
Roadway infrastructure is one of the most widely used major capital investments
of a municipality. Without a well-maintained street system, the transportation
needs of the public, business, industry, and government cannot be met. The roads
are also part of a critical public safety need, as they contribute to the general health
and welfare of the community. Maintaining quality roadway infrastructure is also
important for maintaining property values. It has been shown that property values
tend to suffer from adjacent poorly maintained streets. Roadway infrastructure
includes residential streets, arterial streets, and traffic safety improvements. In the
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, there are 44.3 miles of arterial streets and 104.2
miles of residential streets. The total of all streets and alleys mileage is 148.5
centerline miles.
To manage the City's residential and arterial streets, the City hires a consultant
who conducts a full -detailed assessment of all streets once every three years. This
report, known as the Pavement Management Program (PMP), helps to identify any
serious issues and provides the City with a rating for each street. The report
includes the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The City of Rancho Palos
Verdes maintains a minimum standard for PCI for a municipal street system at 80.
The City's current PCI is 81.8 based upon the PMP report prepared by Bucknam
Infrastructure Group, Inc. in 2013. Since 1997, the City has maintained a
pavement rating between 80 and 90. The report also helps in defining a schedule
to complete the work. The City has been divided into nine zones for residential
streets, but in the case of some areas, zones may be completed together in one
year for added efficiency.
25
MP
PROJECT:
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Zone 7
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City's Pavement Management Plan, Zone 7 of the
residential rehabilitation program is scheduled for implementation
during the FY15-16 budget cycle. This project will include micro-
surfacing, slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root removals, and ADA
compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zone 7. This
infrastructure enhancement will also include updating traffic signs,
striping, curb painting, house numbering, and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$2,282,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$2,282,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $82,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY16-17. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good Condition."
LOCATION PHOTO
LOCATION DESCRIPTION
-
Zone 7: The Ladera Linda community, Ganado
Area, streets near Mira Catalina School, San
Ramon and Calle Aventura.
26
29
PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Zone 8
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
As part of the City's PMP, Zone 8 of the residential rehabilitation
program is scheduled for implementation during the FY16-17
DESCRIPTION: budget cycle. This project will include micro -surfacing, slurry seal,
overlay, curb repair, root removals, and ADA compliance updates
of the streets and sidewalks in Zone 8. This infrastructure
enhancement will also include updating traffic signs, striping, curb
painting, house numbering, and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $2,200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY17-18. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good Condition."
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 8: Residential neighborhoods off of Palos
Verdes Drive East in the northern and eastern parts
of the City.
}
27
Wo
PROJECT:
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Zones 3 & 4
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
As part of the City's PMP, Zones 3 & 4 of the residential
rehabilitation program are scheduled for implementation during the
FY18-19 budget cycle. This project will include micro -surfacing,
DESCRIPTION:
slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root removals, and ADA compliance
updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zones 3 & 4. This
infrastructure enhancement will also include updating traffic signs,
striping, curb painting, house numbering, and monument surveying,
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$2,100,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$2,100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X I COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY18-19. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good Condition."
LOCATION PHOTO
LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 3: Residential streets north of Silver Spur Rd and
east of Hawthorne Blvd, including the Blackhorse
community, Silver Arrow, Longhill, and Beechgate.
Zone 4: Residential streets bordering Crenshaw Blvd
and Crest Road, including the Sea Crest, Sea Breeze,
Island View, and Ridgecrest communities.
E�nD9l�fi�Q
W
31
PROJECT:
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Zone 5
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
As part of the City's PMP, Zone 5 of the residential rehabilitation
program is scheduled for implementation during the FY19-20 budget
cycle. This project will include micro -surfacing, slurry seal, overlay,
DESCRIPTION:
curb repair, root removals and ADA compliance updates of the
streets and sidewalks in Zone 5. This infrastructure enhancement
will also include updating traffic signs, striping, curb painting, house
numbering, and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$2,182,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$2,182,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $82,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential
street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY19-20. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Ver Good Condition."
LOCATION PHOTO
LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 5: Residential streets in the most western part of
the City, off Hawthorne and between Crest and
PVDW.
k.N'M•1
t s,
29
32
PROJECT: ARTERIAL REHABILITATION -
CRENSHAW BLVD
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd.
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
As part of the City's PMP, the Crenshaw Blvd. arterial will be
DESCRIPTION: resurfaced. The project will include milling and overlay,
roadway patching, crack filling, curb and gutter repair, sidewalk
repair, and ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $200,000
CONSTRUCTION $2,600,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $200,000 $2,600,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Proposition A, Proposition C, CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money),
Measure R funds, and/or State Transportation Local Program funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The project goal would result in a pavement condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good
Condition."
30
33
31
34
ARTERIAL REHABILITATION - INDIAN
PROJECT:
PEAK ROAD
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Indian Peak Road
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
As part of the City's PMP, the Indian Peak Road arterial will be
DESCRIPTION:
resurfaced. The project will include milling and overlay, roadway
patching, crack filling, curb and gutter repair, sidewalk repair, and
ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2
YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$200,000
CONSTRUCTION
$1,600,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$200,000 $1,600,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Proposition A, Proposition C, CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money),
Measure R funds, and/or State Transportation Local Program funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The project goal would result in a pavement condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good
Condition."
31
34
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT: PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT
BRONCO DRIVE
TYPE: Traffic Improvements
LOCATION: PVDE at Bronco Drive
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Improve portions of PVDE to provide wider travel lanes in each
direction, a shared -use equestrian and pedestrian path located
behind the existing guardrail, a high visibility equestrian
DESCRIPTION: crossing at Bronco Drive complete with flashing beacons,
augmented crossing signage and advanced crossing signage
with flashing beacons, and installation of safety barriers and
railing to reduce vehicle collisions and cross-over accidents.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $500,300
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $500,300
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be determined at the conclusion of design and construction.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Staff has secured an HSIP grant that requires a 10% local match from CIP Reserve funds (General
Fund money).
LOCATION PHOTO MAP
32
35
PROJECT:
PVDS ROADWAY
REALIGNMENT
TYPE:
Roadway Project
LOCATION:
PVDS
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The project would re-align approximately 1.6 miles of
Palos Verdes Drive South, which is located within and
traverses the Abalone Cove, Portuguese Bend, and
Klondike Canyon Landslides. The location of the
roadway is constantly moving as the sub-soils within
the landslide move. Extensive grading is needed to
re-establish (relocate) the roadway within the right-of-
way.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$3,060,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$3,060,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Project design of $245,000 was appropriated in FY13-14.
Realignment of PVDS was last performed around 1988.
33
36
PROJECT:
WESTERN AVENUE TRAFFIC
IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Western Avenue
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Western Avenue Task Force group was formed, consisting of
City of RPV, City of LA, and Caltrans staff. Since its inception, the
working group completed a Western Avenue Corridor Study in 2007,
which is a strategic action plan that:
• Identified the current and future deficiencies in the multi -modal
transportation system within the corridor; and
• Recommended consensus -based solutions (including required
strategies) to address the deficiencies.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$3,200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$3,200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal impact to operating budget since right-of-way is primarily maintained by Caltrans. The City is responsible
for trees, graffiti, and trash removal. Requirements of the Ponta Vista development project may mitigate some
of the traffic needs identified in 2007.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is eligible for Measure R funding through the South Bay Highway Program administered through the
South Bay Council of Governments.
WESTERN CORRIDOR
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
34
37
PROJECT:
HAWTHORNE BLVD RIGHT OF WAY
BEAUTIFICATION Phase 1
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Hawthorne Blvd (City Hall to Northerly City Limits)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Make simple beautification improvements to the Hawthorne Blvd
median that would include new trees, modest paved median
improvements (surface treatment) and removal of damaged private
chain link fence along the roadside.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$10,000
CONSTRUCTION
$140,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$150,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No impact to operating budget. On-going
median and roadside maintenance is included in operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project precedes longer-term work to address the condition and replacement of private walls and fences
adjacent to the right-of-way
35
a*
PROJECT:
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
(PMP) UPDATE
TYPE:
Intangible Capital Outlay
LOCATION:
N/A
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The PMP is updated every three years to evaluate the condition of the
City's roadway system and to identify Citywide Arterial and
Residential Street Rehabilitation projects. The Metropolitan Transit
Authority (Metro) requires the PMP update in order for the City to
continue receiving Proposition C funds.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$120,000 $120,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$120,000 $120,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
36
39
SANITARY SEWER PROJECTS
The City's sanitary sewer system is essential to City operations, yet it has not
required significant expenditures in past years due to an inter -local agreement with
Los Angeles County for maintenance of the system. The City owns the system,
but the County has the primary responsibility for ongoing maintenance of the
system, which does not include the Abalone Cove Sewer system. The County
collects a sewer fee from the City's property owners, which is used to maintain the
system. Although the County maintains the sewer system, the City retains
responsibility for its operation, public safety, and welfare. The City, not the County,
maintains legal and regulatory responsibility (i.e., any state or federal fines
resulting from spillage).
The City conducted a survey of the system, and in 2004 and updated that survey
in 2009 through the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update, which was created to
help in the management of this asset. The study examined sample areas
throughout the City and assessed the overall system as "fair." The inspection
revealed root intrusion and cracking in the pipes, in addition to accumulated fats
and grease clogging certain areas. It appeared that the County had not been
performing preventative maintenance in prior years. Without regular maintenance,
overflows due to root and grease blockages will occur. To minimize the potential
for overflow and to restore and maintain the system in "good" condition, a
significant investment in pipeline inspection, repair, and maintenance was
performed by the County. The County has completed a full inspection and
cleaning of all RPV sewer mains. Problem areas are being properly maintained
and/or are scheduled for repair through larger projects.
The projects identified herein were included in the City's Wastewater Master Plan
Update, which was completed in 2009 to address potential locations of under -
capacity (the ability of the existing pipe to convey sewage flows without overflowing
into the street). Further physical investigation will be made before contracting for
construction of repairs. Planned projects may change once physical inspections
are performed. The County maintenance and repair program does not provide for
replacement of pipeline due to capacity issues.
37
.s
PROJECT:
SEWER CAPACITY PROJECT- OTHER
LOCATIONS
TYPE:
Sewer System
LOCATION:
Various
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Several smaller locations throughout the City may require repairs.
The 2009 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan indicated that unidentified
sections of the City's sewer system may be under capacity. The
Plan indicates that these projects could replace 1,951 feet of 8 -inch
sewer pipe with 12 -inch vitrified clay pipelines.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$75,000
CONSTRUCTION
$340,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
$50,000
LEGAL
TOTAL
$465,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked Number 8 out of the 8 identified capital improvement projects in
the plan.
W
41
PROJECT:
SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT -
MALAGA CANYON
TYPE:
Sewer System
LOCATION:
N/A
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City's sewer system has been determined to be
under capacity. This project will replace 1,850 feet of 10 -inch sewer
pipe. The pipe will be replaced with a 15 -inch vitrified clay
pipeline. The pipeline runs behind properties in Malaga Canyon,
parallel to Basswood Avenue between Mossbank Drive and Mazur
Drive. This section of pipeline is over capacity when analyzed,
considering the factor of safety flow run.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$59,000
CONSTRUCTION
$335,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
$13,000
LEGAL
TOTAL
$407,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 5 out of the 8 identified capital Improvement projects in
the plan.
39
42
STORM WATER SYSTEM
The 2004 Update to the 1998 Master Plan of Drainage identified 38 potential
projects, excluding storm drain lining, that staff would need to address in the City's
storm drain system. Staff has addressed all or portions of these projects and has
added other projects to the lists. A new Master Plan of Drainage was
commissioned to provide a comprehensive and current analysis of the drainage
needs in the City in consideration of the work already done and new engineering
standards promulgated by the LA County Flood Control District. The new Master
Plan will be finalized in 2015. Staff expects the new Master Plan will identify
additional projects to correct pipes with deficient capacity, poor physical condition,
or both.
Staff has also conducted a thorough video inspection of the entire City -owned pipe
inventory and has compiled the results for analysis. This will lead to identifying
lining needs for the coming years. While it is not clear yet which pipes will be
programmed for lining first, the need is clear. The following table depicts the
overall observations made of the City -owned pipes. About 23% of the City's pipes
(about 26,800 linear feet) have a condition rating of 3 or worse. Of this amount,
about 18,300 linear feet are corrugated metal pipes (CMP) and would rank at
highest priority for lining. In time, all CMP should be lined and reinforced concrete
pipe (RCP) with condition defects will need to be addressed on an individual basis
to determine if lining will resolve the issues.
Storm Drain Video Inspection Summary
43
---------------------------
Level Condition !
Linear Feet
% of Total
% CMP
Number I
Inspected
% RCP
15% CMP
Level Good
77,997
67%-------
_ _
85%
85% RCP r
II Light/minor
30% CMP
Level 1 defect j
7,631
7% �.
70% RCP
Moderate
35% CMP i
Level 2
defect
4,059
3% —
-- -
65% RCP
1 Average
40% CMP
Level 3 1 defect
7,360
6%
g0% RCP
�---
60% CMP
Level 4 j Heavy defect
6,966
6% -
--- -
40% RCP
90% CMP
Level 5 Severe defect
12,475 !
11%
10% RCP
Total Linear Footage
- - -_
116,488
100%
J
43
PROJECT:
STORM DRAIN LINING
TYPE:
Storm Drain System
LOCATION:
Project Area 12
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
All Corrugated Metal Pipe storm drain lines within the City have
reached their design life expectancy and need to be lined to extend
their life another 30+ years. CMP dating back to the 1940s has been
DESCRIPTION:
discovered and requires rehabilitation, along with those most
recently installed in the 1970s. A large number of drainage
problems citywide can be overcome by relining deteriorated pipes
and improving inlet and outlet structures.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$340,836 $347,653 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$340,836 $347,653 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: WQFP user fees through FY15-16 and the CIP Reserve funds (General
Fund money) thereafter. Ongoing maintenance costs should decrease, as pipes which have been lined
generally require less maintenance, resulting
in a cost savings. Because the Storm Drain User Fee sunsets in
FY15-16, lining projects will compete with other infrastructure rehabilitation projects for funding from the CIP
Reserve in the future.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
LOCATION PHOTO
MAP
i
RSR.
i
41
.A
PROJECT: PAINTBRUSH CANYON DRAINAGE
PROJECT STUDY REPORT
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 11
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
The Project Study Report is expected to include: 1) a study of the
drainage area; 2) a study of the drainage needs; 3) multiple design
alternatives; 4) identification of environmental requirements; 5)
DESCRIPTION: identification of right-of-way needs; and 6) a recommended scope
for development of an engineering design leading to construction of
drainage improvements. Any improvements to drainage in
Paintbrush Canyon will be complex due to right-of-way and
landslide issues.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $120,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $120,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: WQFP user fees and CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X I COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Preventing runoff water from entering the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project is expected to help slow movement within the Portuguese Bend landslide,
eventually affecting the land movement on Palos Verdes Drive South.
4
42
45
PROJECT:
STORM DRAIN POINT REPAIR
PROJECTS
TYPE:
Storm Drain System
LOCATION:
Citywide
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
During the 2012 Storm Drain Lining and Rehabilitation Project,
several pipes were unable to be lined due to local structural failure
of the pipes. This project will provide funds to correct the deficient
locations in these pipes to prepare them for lining in the future.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$900,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$900,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: WQFP user fees.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Many of these point repairs are difficult to access and may require acquisition of temporary or permanent
access easements to address current and future maintenance needs. Locations include Santa Rena pipe
inlet, Enrose Avenue CMP, Via Colinita north of Maine, Vista Mesa, and PVDE at Marion Drive.
LOCATION PHOTO
,A;
MAP
Point Repair Projects —
Legacy from 2012 Lining Project
yt
43
A •
47
STORM WATER QUALITY REGIONAL
PROJECT:
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TYPE:
Storm Water Quality Project
LOCATION:
TBD
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
In order to comply with the new MS4 permit requirements, the
Peninsula cities will work together to address storm water quality
issues by developing an Enhanced Watershed Management Plan
(EWMP), including the development of structural treatment
DESCRIPTION:
projects. This provides an estimate of the City's share of the cost
to build these Storm Water Quality Improvement projects. The first
phase projects must be built within 30 months of when the MS4
permit is received. Scope and timing of future phases will be
determined upon approval of the EWMP by the Regional Storm
Water Quality Board.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Required as part of MS4 Permit Enhanced Watershed Management Plan. Locations to be determined once
pollutant monitoring studies are analyzed. The City will have an ongoing commitment to additional projects in
the future. In the absence of more defined information, a placeholder of $100,000 annually has been included
as the City's contribution to other storm water quality projects.
47
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs
through various planning processes, but currently there are no identified financial
resources to complete the projects. As funding becomes available and the City
Council prioritizes and approves projects, they may be moved into the funded Five -
Year CIP schedule. Additional projects will be identified in 2015 and 2016, through
the development of the Infrastructure Management Plan (IMP), involvement of the
Infrastructure Management Committee (IMAC), and completion of the Storm Drain
Master Plan, General Plan and Parks Master Plan.
aim
H;
RPV Capital Improvement Plan - Unfunded Projects
Potential Safety City Council Cost Range
Proiect Paae Fundina Goal Prioritv Minimum Maximum
Palos Verdes Drive South Landslide
Landslide Early Warning System
48
x
x
300,000
300,000
Park Sites
Restroom at Del Cerro Park
50
250,000
300,000
Lower Point Vicente Park Improvement
Project
51
x
2,400,000
2400000
Civic Center Skate Plaza & Tennis Court
52
x
x
x
850,000
850,000
Coast Vision Plan -
Trailhead/Ovedook/Vista Point
Development
53
x
800,000
11040,000
Concrete Stairs at Ladera Linda &
Hesse
54
x
140,000
180,000
Public Buildings
Citywide ADA Transition Plan
Implementation
56
x
x
4,520 000
41520,000
Point Vicente Park Community Center
57
x
3 000 000
8,000,000
Corporation Storage Yard Relocation
58
300,000
300,000
Right of Way
Hawthorne Blvd. Median Improvements
is Rivera to City Hall
60
250,000
250,000
Lower Point Vicente Park Access
Modification Project PVDW at PVIC
61
x
x
x
250,000
300,000
Crenshaw Blvd Extension Parking
Improvements
62
x
125,000
150,000
Hawthorne Blvd. Right of Way
Beautification Phase 2
63
x
x
2,200,000
2600000
Hawthorne Blvd. Bike Lane Gap Closure
64
x
x
1,200,000
1,500 000
Traffic Safety Improvements - PVDE at
Miraleste Drive
65
x
x
x
200,000
300,000
Utility Undergrounding Crenshaw
66
x
x
1,200,000
2000000
Utility Undergrounding along PVDS
La Rotonda and City Limits
67
x
x
1,000,000
1500000
Utility Undergrounding at Entrance to
PVIC
68
x
x 1
150,000
200,000
Utility Undergrounding at PVDS and
Terranea Way
69
x
x
150,000
200,000
Storm Water System
Altamira Canyon
71
x
x
1,600,000
5350 000
Paintbrush Canyon Drainage
72
x
x
2,568,000
2568 000
PVDE - Miraleste Canyon
73
x
x
2,500 000
3,200,000
San Pedro & Averill Canyons
74
x
x
2,700,000
3300000
Catch Basin Screen Installation
75
x
x
600,000
900,000
Trails
Preserve Trail Plan - New Trail
Implementation
77
x
x
150,000
150,000
California Coastal Trail Improvements
78
x
223,000
223,000
Totals Min, and Max.
$ 29,626,000
$ 42,581,000
.n.
51 s
PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH LANDSLIDE
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
47
50
LANDSLIDE EARLY WARNING
PROJECT:
SYSTEM (LEWS)
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: Palos Verdes Drive South in the Portuguese Bend Landslide Area
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
The main sewer trunk line owned and operated by the Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County, and which serves a significant
portion of the residential properties in RPV, parallels the PVDS
roadway above ground in the landslide area. Both facilities require
constant maintenance due to landslide movement, which poses a
significant operational hazard should the landslide experience rapid
land movement. Closure of these facilities would be highly disruptive
DESCRIPTION: to the city's economic vitality, transportation, public health and
safety, and use of public open space and trails. Sewer overflows
from the trunk line could potentially threaten the ecosystems of the
nearby Pacific Ocean coastline. A landslide early warning system
(LEWS) would provide critical advanced knowledge of changed
landslide conditions by alerting public safety and public works first -
responders, who would be able to respond sooner and more
proactively with public safety information and preventative
measures.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
It is estimated that LEWS annual operations and maintenance cost would be approximately $30,000 per year,
which would include scheduled on-site equipment inspection and fees for wireless or satellite communication
systems.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Sensors placed in the area would transmit data through a
wireless or satellite -based system to a web -hosted application
designed to send alerts to public safety and public works first- ,`....;..
responders when specified land movement criteria is reached.
Many of the existing dewatering wells may be suitable for /` t0 , fPC
sensor deployment. The first responders would then be
afforded more time to notify users of the public open space and
trails in the area, mobilize equipment, establish roadway
detours and alternative sewer conveyance, all of which is
intended to protect the public and the environment. There are
partnership possibilities with the Sanitation Districts of LA
County and the LA County Sheriff's and Fire Departments.
Estimated Cost: $300,000.
M.
51
PARK SITES
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
52
PROJECT:
RESTROOM AT DEL CERRO PARK
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION:
Del Cerro Park
DEPARTMENT:
Recreation and Parks/Community Development
DESCRIPTION:
This project would include the construction of a restroom at Del
Cerro park to serve the park visitors and the users of the trails in the
Portuguese Bend Open Space area.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000 - $300,000
50
53
PROJECT:
LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TYPE:
Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION:
Lower Point Vicente
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The park improvement plan for Lower Point Vicente derives from
an extensive public outreach process associated with the City
Council's adopted Vision Plan. The scope of work consists of
constructing new decomposed granite trails, overlooks,
reconfigured and new parking spaces (including a new upper
terrace parking lot), drainage facilities (including a bioswale),
landscaping, fencing, way finding signs and minor site grading to
accommodate the improvements (excavation cannot occur in
areas capped for lead remediation.)
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD Project not expected to begin until FY22-23.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,400,000.
51
54
PROJECT: CIVIC CENTER SKATE PLAZA &
TENNIS COURT
TYPE: Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION: Point Vicente Park
DEPARTMENT: Public Works & Recreation and Parks
This project could include construction of: 1) a 15,000 square -foot
skate plaza; 2) a restroom; 3) appropriate parking and benches; 4)
landscaping and 5) a single -court tennis court (to replace the
existing original court). If a skate plaza is determined to be a
feasible use through the program of utilization that controls the site,
DESCRIPTION: staff will continue to work with the City Council and Skate Park PV
to provide funding for this facility.
The plaza/skate area would be constructed of concrete with
complimenting walkways, stage, handrails, planters, landscaping,
a restroom building, and parking.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Annual facility maintenance is currently estimated to be $13,000. Additional staffing and security may be
necessary to operate the facility.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $850,000 ($750,000 for skate plaza, $100,000 for tennis court)
Private funding may become available. Skate Park PV has expressed a willingness to fund project
construction and ongoing maintenance. However, no commitment has been made at this time.
Once this project begins, the City may incur engineering, management and/or oversight costs. Since this is a
community-based project, these costs are unknown at this time.
52
55
53
56
COAST VISION PLAN
PROJECT:
TRAILHEAD/OVERLOOK/VISTA POINT
DEVELOPMENT
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION:
Various Locations
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works/Community Development
The Vision Plan identifies the construction of trailheads at key
entrances to the existing City trail system, along with overlooks and
vista points within the Vision Plan project area. The trailheads would
consist of a permeable surface pad, a bench, a plastic bag kiosk for
dog owners, trash and recycling receptacles, signage, a
freestanding kiosk for trail notices, small native trees for shade, and
pockets of native shrubs, where appropriate. The overlook/vista
points would be placed on decomposed granite or other permeable
DESCRIPTION:
material, with flush stone edging and could include a semicircle
bench, a stone pilaster displaying pertinent information, a stone clad
wall less than 3 -feet in height and pockets of native shrubs.
Phase 1 would involve a trailhead at Shoreline Park/251h Street and
overlooks/vista points at Inspiration Point and Eagles Nest. Phase 2
would involve trailheads and overlook/vista points at the cul-de-sac
next to St. Paul's Church, Del Cerro Park, and the end of Ocean
Terrace. Phase 3 would involve a trailhead at the
Switch backs/PVD E Turnout and overlook/vista points at the
Switch backs/PVD E Turnout, Paintbrush Canyon/Burma Road, and
Burma Road above Gateway Park.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $100,000 to $130,000 per site x 8 sites = Range of $800,000 - $1,040,000
53
56
PROJECT:
CONCRETE STAIRS AT LADERA
LINDA AND HESSE PARKS
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Various
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Replacement of the wooden stairs at Ladera Linda Park and Hesse
Park is desired to minimize tripping hazards and introduce
uniformity to the stair tread lengths and heights at these two
locations.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $140,000 - 180,000
54
57
PUBLIC BUILDINGS
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
55
w•
56
59
CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN
PROJECT:
IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Various
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
The Citywide ADA Transition Plan, adopted by the City Council on
June 4, 2013, identified total costs of $11.85 million for
implementation. The cost estimate included improvements to ADA
compliance at the Civic Center (buildings and grounds) totaling
$1.36 million, and those at Ladera Linda Park totaling $1.72 million.
Any future improvements at these sites are expected to bring the
facilities into ADA compliance. Additionally, the total cost of $11.85
DESCRIPTION:
million includes right-of-way improvements totaling $2.64 million,
including curb ramps and bus stops. Those improvements will be
addressed as part of each roadway rehabilitation project. The
remaining identified costs of $6.12 million will be addressed through
an annual implementation allocation that began in FYI 3-14. Project
costs "funded" through FYI 9-20 total $1.60 million. The remaining
portion of the $5.97 million, which has not been moved to the
"funded" list is included here.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $4,520,000
Environmental Excise Tax (EET) funding
may become available.
56
59
PROJECT:
POINT VICENTE PARK COMMUNITY
CENTER
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Point Vicente/Civic Center
DEPARTMENT:
City Manager/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Originally studied by the Open Space Planning, Recreation and
Parks Task Force in 2004, the concept for this facility was later
refined during the redevelopment of the Coast Vision Plan. Adopted
by the City Council in 2008, the latest concept calls for a 20,000
square -foot community center that could accommodate meeting
space for community groups, recreational facilities, classroom
space, and a full-sized recreational pool.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Impact will need to be assessed, as projects are considered.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $3,000,000 - $8,000,000
A private donation of $100,000 has been made and additional donations and/or other outside funding may
become available based upon the scope of the project.
57
W
61
CORPORATION STORAGE YARD
PROJECT:
RELOCATION
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Various Locations throughout the City
DEPARTMENT:
City Manager/Public Works
It has been proposed that City maintenance services be spread out
citywide in strategic locations with a central office at City Hall. The
existing corporation/storage yard is located on the Point Vicente
Park site, which had been identified for various other community
uses due to its prime location.
DESCRIPTION:
It may be feasible to create a central location for the storage yard
with satellite locations throughout the City, serving the storage and
construction needs of the Public Works Department. The central
location of the storage yard will be situated at or near City Hall for
administrative purposes. This central location will control all
satellite locations through the use of maintenance personnel and
through the efficient use of the City's computer system network.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The satellite locations will fulfill the following roles: there will bean office trailer at each location; a construction
yard for contractors located throughout the City (possibly generating rental income for the City); possible
satellite EOC centers for access throughout the City; and storage space for various City equipment items.
Estimated Cost: $300,000
W
61
RIGHT OF WAY
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
59
62
PROJECT:
HAWTHORNE BLVD. MEDIAN
IMPROVEMENTS (VIA RIVERA TO
CITY HALL)
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Hawthorne Blvd. (Via Rivera to City Hall)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The development of this median would include installing draught
tolerant landscaping, which would require minimal maintenance.
Development will also include the installation of irrigation systems
and controllers, hardscape, and decorative stone.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed. However, a rough estimate of annual maintenance is about 10% of the total project cost.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000
.e]
Ong
PROJECT:
LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK ACCESS
MODIFICATION PROJECT
TYPE:
Traffic Improvements
LOCATION:
PVDW/PVDS at Lower Point Vicente Park Entrance
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve access into and out of the Lower Point Vicente Park area by
restricting turn movements to right turn only out of the site at the southern
entrance/exit to minimize vehicle conflicts while negotiating turn
movements.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000 - $300,000
Highway Safety Grant funding may become available.
61
Me
PROJECT:
CRENSHAW BOULEVARD EXTENSION
PARKING IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Crenshaw Blvd (Valley View Rd to Burma Rd)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In an effort to improve safety, parking and access to the Nature
Preserve entrance near Del Cerro Park, parking improvements and
restrictions are needed to accommodate the growing user demand
and need for emergency vehicle access.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $125,000 - $150,000
r
4
62
65
63
HAWTHORNE BLVD RIGHT OF WAY
PROJECT:
BEAUTIFICATION (Phase 2)
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Hawthorne Blvd (City Hall to Northerly City Limits)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
The City's Right of Way along Hawthorne Blvd will be beautified by
DESCRIPTION:
landscaping and masking blight conditions created by failed fences,
walls and other private improvements. The medians in this area will
be improved by landscape and/or hardscape enhancements.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Unknown at this time. Impact would be contingent on level of beautification and project components.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,200,000 - $2,600,000
l
k' J
This project is contingent upon the adoption by the
City Council of a plan to address the condition and
replacement of private walls and fences along the
roadside.
f
_
1
63
M
67
HAWTHORNE BLVD BIKE LANE GAP
PROJECT:
CLOSURE
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Hawthorne Blvd (Vallon Drive to Dupre Road)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
This project will improve roadway safety and complete a bike lane
DESCRIPTION:
gap closure that exists due to on -street parking demand, roadway
configuration, and existing median barriers.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Striping refreshing is minimal and would be funded out of the FY15-16 operating allocation.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,200,000 - $1,500,000
Highway Safety Grant funding may become available.
ao
y,.
M
67
PROJECT:
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS -
PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT
MIRALESTE DRIVE
TYPE:
Traffic Improvements
LOCATION:
PVDE at Miraleste Drive
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve intersection operations to create improved traffic flow and
vehicle and pedestrian safety. Operational improvements could
include a roundabout. If a traffic signal was considered, the cost
estimate would increase; however, and Marymount College would
likely fund a small share of the project's cost.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
If a traffic signal is contemplated, annual
maintenance cost could be about $7,000.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X I COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $200,000 - $300,000
Highway Safety Grant funding could become available.
65
PROJECT:
CRENSHAW BLVD UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT
TYPE:
Public Utilities
LOCATION:
Crenshaw Blvd at Crest Road
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The project will underground overhead utility lines along
Crenshaw Blvd south of Crest Road. This project qualifies for
Rule 20A funding.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget. This project would be entirely funded by Rule 20A work credits.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,200,000 - $2,000,000
This project will be included in the RPV Overhead Utilities Conversion Plan for City Council consideration as a
priority undergrounding location.
Irrespective of funding, SCE will own the asset and be responsible for providing ongoing maintenance.
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING ALONG
PROJECT: PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH
BETWEEN LA ROTONDA AND THE
CITY LIMITS
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: PVDS between La Rotonda and City Limits
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and the
DESCRIPTION: coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The City
will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,
communications, etc.) to relocate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison's (SCE's) Rule 20A Funding, which
accumulates at a rate of about $80,000 per year.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 - $1,500,000
This project will be included in the RPV Overhead Utilities Conversion Plan for City Council consideration as
a priority undergrounding location.
Irrespective of funding, SCE will own the asset and be responsible for providing ongoing maintenance.
67
70
PROJECT:
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT
ENTRANCE TO PVIC
TYPE:
Public Utilities
LOCATION:
Palos Verdes Drive South (at PVIC)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and the
coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The City
will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,
communications, etc.) to relocate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison's (SCE's) Rule 20A Funding, which
accumulates at a rate of about $80,000 per year.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000 - $200,000
This project will be included in the RPV Overhead Utilities Conversion Plan for City Council consideration as a
priority undergrounding location.
Irrespective of funding, SCE will own the asset and be responsible for providing ongoing maintenance.
71
PROJECT: UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT PVDS
AND TERRANEA WAY
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: PVDS and Terranea Way
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and the
DESCRIPTION: coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The City
will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,
communications, etc.) to relocate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison's (SCE's) Rule 20A Funding, which
accumulates at a rate of about $80,000 per year.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000 - $200,000
This project will be included in the RPV Overhead Utilities Conversion Plan for City Council consideration as a
priority undergrounding location.
Irrespective of funding, SCE will own the asset and be responsible for providing ongoing maintenance.
.•
72
STORM WATER SYSTEM
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
70
73
PROJECT: ALTAMIRA CANYON
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 4
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
A project within lower Altamira Canyon to aid in slowing the damage
being caused by storm water runoff through the entire reach of the
Canyon is needed. The installation of Gabion-type erosion control
structures within lower Altamira Canyon are needed to help control
DESCRIPTION: runoff velocities and minimize erosion within the canyon.
This project includes the installation of protective measures to
minimize further erosion in Altamira Canyon. This project could
range from stabilization at bends in stream beds, with limited
velocity controls, to channel stabilization.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Note: The Altamira Canyon project has been studied and analyzed over the past decades; however the need
to minimize runoff from entering the ground in Altamira Canyon still remains. A project study report has been
funded for FY14-15.
This estimate does not include right-of-way costs. A previously designed and funded project was abandoned
due to right-of-way issues and owners lack of support.
Estimated Cost: $1,600,000 - $5,350,000
71
74
PROJECT:
PAINTBRUSH CANYON DRAINAGE
TYPE:
Storm Drain System
LOCATION:
Portuguese Bend
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Paintbrush Canyon Drainage System project will capture runoff
at the head of the Portuguese Bend landslide in three locations,
transfer that runoff via surface-mounted High Density Polyethylene
(HDPE) pipe under Palos Verdes Drive South, (through an existing
steel tunnel), and continue the flow along the existing storm drain
pipe alignment to the ocean.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Preventing runoff water from entering the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project is expected to help slow movement within the Portuguese Bend landslide,
eventually affecting the land movement at Palos Verdes Drive South. A project study report has been proposed
for FY19-20.
Estimated Cost: $2,568,000
72
75
PROJECT:
PVDE- MIRALESTE CANYON
TYPE:
Storm Drain System
LOCATION:
Project Area 5
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Work within this project area includes storm drainage systems along
Palos Verdes Drive East at the northern end of PVDE, South Coach,
Rocking Horse, Clevis, North Colt, South Colt, Via Canada, and
South Via Canada. This project includes the installation of a number
of pipelines and re -setting surface drainage systems to drain into
Miraleste Canyon.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,500,000 - $3,200,000
73
76
PROJECT:
SAN PEDRO & AVERILL CANYONS
TYPE:
Storm Drain Systems
LOCATION:
Project Area 6
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Work within this project area would include storm drainage systems
at Miraleste, South Miraleste, North Corsini, Via Colinita, La Vista,
Vista Mesa, and a curb and gutter project on Via Frascati. This
project would include the installation of a number of pipelines and
regrading of roads and surface drainage systems to drain into the
San Pedro and Averill Canyons. A project at Miraleste Plaza has
been completed.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 - $3,300,000
77
75
CATCH BASIN SCREEN
PROJECT:
INSTALLATION
TYPE:
Storm Drain System
LOCATION:
Citywide
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
In order to comply with certain water quality regulations imposed by
the Regional Water Control Board, the City will need to install catch
basin screens to prevent trash and debris from entering the Santa
DESCRIPTION:
Monica Bay and LA Harbor. It is not clear yet how many of the City's
catch basins will require the retrofit or how intense the
implementation scheme will be.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: WQFP (Storm Drain User Fee) Fund and CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The City has installed these screens in about 100 catch basins (for the Machado Lake watershed) at a recent
cost of about $700 each (not including permitting). There are up to 1,200 catch basins remaining that may
require this retrofit. Estimate cost: $600,000 - $900,000.
, � t�mr rfiq vrv. rrr !ir'rrrt.S?:�:�w�.yv rrsti �ill�r _..
__ ..:tMVf�y.'t•,':t•''••':t•:•:}'}:•.':''•'}":::::t:t.•.'.'.•.:'l.'}ll'.•}:'}:}:•:::•,
l'•"?:
.'''0 {4 x. r.:::::ir�....:;:r �{...•�vi}}�:{�gYri}y...;....'rgl.
;..
4 l<' yay��s�c:i{sifi}:{•}irrii: � Y?•iiiv}t {•} :rr i}::.}} �vl ri}}C ;�iir{ri
I'llA:r,
rf : •• vrii}}i�j/�f �e't�li;:
r
r.
' '� y 11.x•
rw
75
TRAILS
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
Iw
m
77
:1
PRESERVE TRAILS PLAN - NEW
PROJECT:
TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION:
Palos Verdes Nature Preserve
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development/Public Works
In October 2012, the City Council adopted an updated Preserve
Trails Plan (PTP) for the NCCP's Palos Verdes Nature Preserve,
which identifies trail routes and trail uses within the Preserve.
Pursuant to the approved management agreement between the
City and PVPLC, PVPLC is responsible for maintenance and repair
of existing unimproved trails in the Preserve, while the City is
responsible for the construction of new trails identified in the PTP.
DESCRIPTION:
According to the PTP, there are three approved trail routes that
currently do not exist and need to be constructed at some point by
the City. Since projects are moving forward on two of the three new
trails needed (the Smugglers Trail in the Abalone Cove Reserve
and the Switchback Trail in the San Ramon Reserve), construction
of the Crystal Trail (.12 mile) in the Forrestal Reserve remains as
the only new trail that needs construction.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000
If a trail improvement is considered to be a critical link, outside grant funding may become available. If the trail
improvement is in the right-of-way, then potential funding may become available through the Active
Transportation Program (ATP).
77
:1
PROJECT:
CALIFORNIA COASTAL TRAIL
IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE:
Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION:
PVDW — Marguerite Drive to Calle Entradero & PVIC Blufftop
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works & Recreation and Parks
DESCRIPTION:
Two sections of the California Coastal Trail near the Point Vicente
Interpretive Center (PVIC) and Oceanfront Estates are paved with
asphalt that has deteriorated. This project would replace the asphalt
with decomposed granite, enhancing the aesthetic value of the
California Coastal Trail within the City.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $223,000
W
a