Loading...
CC SR 20180306 H - Representation of Campbell as Witness in Green Hills Litigation.srRANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT AGENDA DESCRIPTION: MEETING DATE: 03/06/2018 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar Report on closed session action taken by the City Council on February 20, 2018, and ratified regarding representation of former Mayor Brian Campbell in a deposition by Green Hills in the matter of Sharon Loveys v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Case No. BC629637. COUNCIL ACTION: (1) The Council decided by unanimous vote on February 20, 2018, and affirms that providing a defense for former Mayor Brian Campbell to represent him as he is deposed by Green Hills in the matter of Sharon Loveys v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Case No. BC629637, between Green Hills and the Vista Verde homeowners is not in the public interest. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Amount Budgeted: N/A Additional Appropriation: N/A Account Number(s): N/A ORIGINATED BY: David J. Aleshire, City Attorney REVIEWED BY: Gabriella Yap, Deputy City Manager. APPROVED BY: Doug Willmore, City Manager f l -j ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: A. January 30, 2018, letter from Brian Campbell to Mayor Brooks, Mayor Pro Tem Duhovic, and City Attorney re legal representation (page A-1) B. February 26, 2018, letter from City Attorney to Brian Campbell re California Public Records Act Status (page B-1) C. January 31, 2018 Notice of Continuance of Deposition of Brian Campbell and Demand for Production of Documents (page C-1) INTRODUCTION Former Mayor Campbell was recently subpoenaed to a deposition in the ongoing Green Hills litigation with the Vista Verde homeowners (the "Nuisance Action"). Mr. Campbell is not a party to the litigation, and is being deposed as a witness only at this time. On February 5, 2018, Green Hills' counsel, Ellen Berkowitz, forwarded to the City Attorney Green Hills' Request for Production of Documents ("Document Request"), served on Mr. Campbell on January 24, 2018, as part of the deposition subpoena. The Document Request included all communications relating to Green Hills between Mr. Campbell and 01203.0001/450356.2 1 Vista Verde condominium owners and their current and former counsel, Planning Commissioner Tomblin and any other commissioner, Jeff Lewis, any government entity other than the City, and any other individual not affiliated with the City. The Document Request mirrors some long-standing requests for public records that Green Hills made of the City and Mr. Campbell, initially on May 20, 2016, and renewed on December 4, 2017, for all communications to and from Mr. Campbell, and between Mr. Campbell and Commissioner Tomblin, that reference Green Hills. Although the City complied with Green Hills' CPRA requests, in part, it was not able to get from Mr. Campbell records from his personal server. Although Green Hills could initiate action against the City for its noncompliance, it has not done so at this time and the current subpoena is a separate matter pursuant to the Nuisance Action. The City Attorney made repeated attempts, both in 2016 and since December 2017, when the City received Green Hills' renewed CPRA request, to obtain compliance. Specifically to the December 4, 2017, request, the City Attorney communicated with Mr. Campbell by email several times, including on December 20, 2017, when the City Attorney asked for an unambiguous response within 3 days regarding when Mr. Campbell would produce the emails, and then again on January 2, 2018, and by letter on December 18, 2017, and January 25, 2018. The City Attorney most recently reached out to Mr. Campbell by email on February 9, 2018, following the first closed session on this issue, again reiterating Mr. Campbell's obligations pursuant to the CPRA. On January 30, 2018, Mr. Campbell made a written request to be represented by the City at the deposition. The City Council discussed the matter in closed session on February 6, 2018, and then February 20, 2018. The City Council is committed to full transparency in government. On that basis, and partly as a result of Mr. Campbell's refusal to cooperate with the Green Hills CPRA requests, as well as his failure to respond to earlier CPRA requests by other parties, the City Council adopted new and more specific policies to minimize the possibility that future councilmembers and city officials will circumvent the open government laws. To wit, the City Council recently adopted a policy that prohibits councilmembers and city officials from using non -City email accounts for City business so as to ensure the City's ability to respond to CPRA and discovery requests independent of the individual practices of the particular city official. The new policy specifies that noncompliance with the policy is outside the scope of duties, and the City will not provide a defense for any city official who violates the policy. However, while Mr. Campbell was on the City Council, the City had in place Policy No. 46, which required that councilmembers preserve all emails sent solely to or from private email accounts if responsive to a CPRA request. After Policy No. 46 was adopted, the Supreme Court decided City of San Jose v. Superior Court (2017) 2 Cal.5t" 608, and held that emails relating to city business that are on personal email accounts are public records subject to the CPRA, therefore such emails must now be disclosed if they are responsive and not exempt. 01203.0001/450356.2 2 LEGAL BACKGROUND On February 20, 2018, after discussing the legal background of Mr. Campbell's request that the City provide legal representation for Mr. Campbell, the City Council unanimously declined and the action was reported out. The basis of that action is discussed below. Where a lawsuit is filed against an official or former official, Section 995 of the Government Code obligates the City to provide defense to that official (including councilmembers and former councilmembers) in a civil proceeding against him or her that arises from acts or omissions taken within the scope of his or her employment. The City can refuse to defend under certain circumstances. However, Mr. Campbell is not currently a named defendant in the lawsuit. Government Code Section 995.9 gives the City discretion whether or not to represent Mr. Campbell at his deposition if he is testifying on behalf of the City regarding actions the City requested of him. Based on the matters requested in the deposition subpoena, the City's decision to defend and indemnify Mr. Campbell must rest on the City Council's "sound discretion" that (i) the action being brought against the witness is based directly upon the conduct which the public entity requested of the witness, and (ii) such representation is in the public interest. Assuming that Mr. Campbell would be testifying about conduct that the City requested of him, which is not at all certain, so long as he is not a party in the litigation the City is within its discretion to decide whether providing a defense serves the public interest. Our office recommended if the City Council decides to provide a defense, that conflict counsel be used, as we believe potential conflicts exist. In joint representation, the attorney-client privilege is waived as between the joint clients, and the City's interests may become adverse to Mr. Campbell if he is brought into the litigation or if other adversarial matters arise between the City and Mr. Campbell. Based on the above, the City Council determined that providing a legal representation for Mr. Campbell at this time would not only not serve the public interest in the deposition, but rather would reward Mr. Campbell's conduct in violation of the CPRA and the City's policies, not just with the Green Hills CPRA requests, but also from Mr. Huang and others. This is based upon Mr. Campbell's nonresponses to the Green Hills public records requests, specifically the May 20, 2016, and December 4, 2017, Green Hills requests, the City Council found it possible that the Document Request and deposition would not have been necessary had Mr. Campbell complied earlier. Also, the City Council determined that the City Attorney should not represent Mr. Campbell. Mr. Campbell has been so informed and we believe has selected Jeff Lewis to represent him. The City Attorney's office will represent the City at the deposition to prevent disclosure of confidential information. 01203.0001/450356.2 3 RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA Brian Campbell Mayor (Ret.) January 30, 2018 City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Blvd Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Mayor Brooks, Mayor Pro Tem Duhovic and City Attorney Aleshire I am in receipt of a deposition subpoena directed to me in connection with the litigation between Green Hills and the Lomita residents. I am formally requesting that the City advise and if necessary defend and indemnify me in this matter. I received the City Attorney's e-mail of January 26, 2018 suggesting that I have not cooperated with the City. That e-mail is inaccurate and misleading as are many others he has sent. I have always attempted to cooperate with the City and the City Attorney and the city attorney's records will prove that. Should the City not provide me with legal advice and if necessary indemnity and defense in this matter, based on an alleged violation of a newly enacted rule of procedure, I will take the steps necessary to retain counsel of my own and seek reimbursement from the City. Please be advised that the City Attorney is in a better position to protect City communications involving privileges and deliberations in the documentation requested and likely testimony for this deposition. My own privately retained attorney may not be able to adequately protect the City and I will not be responsible in that regard nor for the additional legal expenses incurred if the City refuses to cooperate in this matter. I look forward to hearing back from you within 48 hours in order to ensure that my rights and the City's rights are not prejudiced by any delay in my obtaining counsel. Best regards, 904 Silver Spur Road #282 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 A-1 A.LESHIRE @ WYNDER LLi, ATT 0 R N E, Y 5 Al L. A W ORANGE COUNTY ( I_0S ANGHE ] i RIVERSOF I CENTRAL VAI.A.F Y February 26, 2018 VIA U.S. MAIL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Brian Campbell 29418 Quailwood Drive Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 E -Mail: campbell.rpv@gmail.com Re: California Public Records Act Status Dear Brian: David J. Aleshire 18881 Von Karman Avenue, daleshire@awattorneys.com Suite 1700 (949) 250-5409 Irvine, CA 92612 P (949) 223-1170 F (949) 223-1180 AWATTORNEYS.COM This is a follow up to my email of February 21, 2018, concerning your request of January 30, 2018, for legal representation in connection with the subpoena dated January 31, 2018, in the Loveys vs. Green Hills matter. On February 20, 2018, in closed session, the City discussed whether to represent you in the Green Hills deposition in the Loveys matter, in accordance with your January 30, 2018 request, and whether the deposition would go forward if you provided the requested records. From my conversation with Attorney Ellen Berkowitz, it seems they will go forward with the deposition. The Council decided unanimously that they decline to have the City Attorney represent you or pay for your legal representation, largely because they believe it is contrary to the public interest to defend a councilmember who has been uncooperative in providing public records. Nevertheless, the Council would like the City Attorney to be present at the deposition and to discuss with your legal counsel how to protect confidential communications from being disclosed in the deposition. I assume you will be using Jeff Lewis as your legal counsel, but please confirm. My partner June Ailin would be handling the deposition on behalf of the City. I hope we can work expeditiously together to resolve these public record issues. Please work with Juliette Tran of our office and let me know of any problems. 01203.0030/450415.2 B-1 Brian Campbell February 26, 2018 Page 2 Very truly yours, ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP David J. Aleshire City Attorney DJA:rsb cc: Mayor & Members of the City Council Doug Willmore June Ailin Juliette Tran 01203.0030/450415.2 B-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HILL, FARRER & BURRILL LLP I KEVIN H. BROGAN (Bar No. 089427) JEFFREY B. BELL (13ar No. 269648) I , A ST TI '111 No, OWL (Bair 162) R 0 Du N "r- Y One California Plaza, 37th Floor 300 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3147 Telephone: ('213) 620-0460 Fax: (213) 624-118,40 Attorneys for Defendant GREEN HILLS MEMORIAL PARK SUPERIOR COt.JR'l I OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHARON LOVE'S, an individual, et al, Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a General Law City; GREEN HILLS MEMORIAL PARK; a California Corporation, and DOES I - 10, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. BC629637 [Assigned to the Hon, David Sotelo] Dept, 40] NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF DEPOSITION OF BRIAN CAMPBELL AND DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Date: March 7, 2018 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: 300 S. Grand Ave., 37"' Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant Green Hills Memorial Park ("GREEN HILLS") shall take the deposition upon oral examination of Brian Campbell previously noticed for February 20, 2018, has been continued, at the request of the deponent, to March 7, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. All other terms and conditions contained in the original notice of deposition are incorporated herein and remain in full force and effect. NOTICE; OF CON'T'INUANCE OF DEPOSITION OF BRIAN CAMPBELL AND DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMEN'rs C-1 CL Q�2'S�Zg ob J W s�zxu a�oasu; 4rw-a-`�w S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1.5 16 1p7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: Januarys , 2018 FIFB 1876992.1 G7762002 HILL, FAI[ tR. ?IZ �' 1 .111:[ZII,I LLP Py IIZO(4AN . Attorneys for Defendant GREEN HILLS MEMORIAL PARK -2- .. .... .... . NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF DEPOSITION OF BRIAN CAMPBELL AND DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS C-2 a A �aggq4i otl��a�c3 wiz= O K ak°gw U. � .-a W o x 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned declares: I am a resident of the state of California and over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action; my business address is Hill, Farrer & Burrill LLP, One California Plaza, 37th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071-3147, On January 31, 2018, I served the within documents: ! fmroxanno lu • f • by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.rn, Cby placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon i!�i fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Los Angeles, California addressed as set forth below. ® by causing personal delivery by of the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below. Ejby placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed _ envelope and t_ t affixing a pre -paid air bill, and causing the envelope to be delivered to a agent for delivery. E] by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below. ® by electronic mail: I transmitted a true copy of such documents) described above, via electronic mail to: see attached service list below. SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST I am readily familiar with the lirnl's practice ot'collection and piocessirxg correspondence for mailing, Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage- thereorr, fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. i am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed irrvalid if postal caiicellation date or postage meter date is more than one day sifter date ot'deposit for nailing in affidavit. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on January 31, 2018, at 1,10. Angcics, California, I Erni A. Nonato C-3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SERVICE LIST 'haron Loveys, el a' vs. I-',*,, � I S 11 -,,y of Palos Verdes, et al. Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC629637 Noel Weiss, Esq, LAW OFFICES OF NOEL WEISS 13700 Marina Pointe Drive, #922 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Ellen Berkowitz GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90067-2121 HrB 1625630.1 G7762002 A ttorneysfor Petitioner SHARON LO VE YS, individually and a Class Representative Of Vista Verde Homeowners Tel: 310.822,0239 Fax: 31.0,822.7028 Email: noelweissL@ca.rr.com Tel: (310) 586-7763 Email: berkowitze La)gtlaw,com; kh—anr@ ,gtlaw.com -2- C-4