RPVCCA_CC_SR_2015_06_02_04_CIPCITY OF IL
MEMORANDUM
RANCHO PALOS VERDES
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: KATHRYN DOWNS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JUNE 2, 2015
SUBJECT: DRAFT 2015 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
REVIEWED: DOUG WILLMORE, CITY MANAGER MAIJ
Project Manager: Allan Kaufman, Senior Administrative Analyst
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive and file the draft 2015 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP); and
2. Provide direction to Staff regarding any changes to the planned funding of projects
over the next five years.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The CIP is a guide for the efficient and effective provision of resources for improving and
maintaining public infrastructure and facilities. The CIP is segregated into both Funded
and Unfunded projects and includes detailed "project sheets" that provide a project
description, project type (e.g. Roadway Infrastructure), location, department responsible,
estimates of cost, and the justification (e.g. safety, City Council goal, outside funding
available). The CIP document does not include any projects with estimated costs below
the infrastructure capitalization threshold of $100,000. The document also does not
include projects that have already been appropriated in FY14-15.
Although the CIP document presents project funding for five years, the City Council
approves CIP projects for the upcoming fiscal year only. This gives the City Council the
ability to shift priorities when needed, while at the same time identify future projects and
potential funding mechanisms.
Projects are generally added to the Funded list as available funding sources are identified.
Projects are usually funded first from restricted funds, to be conservative in allocating
General Fund monies only when necessary. Staff recommends planning for use of the
1
DRAFT 2015 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 2, 2015
Page 2 of 3
CIP Reserve (funded with General Fund money equivalent to transient occupancy tax
revenue and prior year favorable General Fund expenditure variance).
On May 26, 2015, the Planning Commission reviewed the CIP Document and found it to
be consistent with the General Plan; however, they made a recommendation to have the
City Council direct Staff to re-evaluate the Fiber Optic Cabling project at Abalone Cove
Sewer Lift Stations, Shoreline Park, and Ladera Linda Community Center and provide
more cost-effective alternatives.
The CIP list of funded projects (totaling $36.7 million) has been integrated into the draft
2015 Five -Year Financial Model, which is a separate item on the June 2, 2015 City
Council agenda. Projects listed in Year 1 of the CIP (totaling $3.3 million) have been
included in the draft FY15-16 budget, which is also on the June 2, 2014 agenda for City
Council consideration.
The purpose of this agenda item is to receive direction from the City Council regarding
any changes to the CIP. After direction is received, Staff will prepare a final document
for City Council to consider adopting on June 16, 2015.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Programming capital facilities and improvements over time can promote better use of the
City's limited financial resources, reduce costs and assist in the coordination of public and
private development. Based on guidelines of the framework and those set forth by the
City Council, Staff developed an inventory of capital projects. This inventory was
compiled through a comprehensive review of existing reports, infrastructure plans,
community input and the City Council's direction, goals and priorities. Some of these
plans include the following: the Pavement Management System, Vision Plan, Sanitary
Sewer Master Plan, Public Use Master Plan, Trails Network Plan, Storm Drain Master
Plan and the General Plan.
Staff evaluated every project quantified during the establishment and update of the CIP
and established Criteria justifications that are reflected on each project sheet. These
justification categories include: safety, support of essential City services, support of
Council plan goals, economy and efficiency, outside funding, and community
quality/sustainability. The Criteria justifications and the availability of restricted (non -
General Fund) monies, are utilized to establish the priority level of CIP projects. Staff has
included columns on the Funded and Unfunded lists (pages 11 & 50 of the document) to
indicate whether the project supports public safety or another City Council priority.
Reconciliation of Proposed Changes to the Funded and Unfunded Lists
Projects moved from Funded to Unfunded list
• Crenshaw Boulevard Undergrounding
K
DRAFT 2015 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
June 2, 2015
Page 3 of 3
Projects added to Funded list
• Year 1 - Civic Center Tennis Court
• Year 1 - ADA Improvement Projects at Del Cerro and Burma Road
Projects removed from Funded list
Sewer Capacity Project at Ginger Root Lane (Project was decreased to $20,000
and has been removed from the capital improvement plan as it does not meet the
$100,000 threshold.)
Point Vicente Interpretive Center Landscaping Improvements (service falls within
the annual maintenance scope of work)
Arterial Rehabilitation at Silver Spur Road (Design phase is not scheduled to begin
until FY20-21.)
Projects added to Unfunded list
• Concrete Stairs at Ladera Linda & Hesse Park
• Catch Basin Screen Installation
Projects removed from Unfunded list
• Traffic Operational Improvements at Crenshaw and Crest
• Infrastructure Management Plan
Staff requests that City Council provide direction regarding any of these proposed
changes, so that adjustments can be made prior to June 16, 2015, when the City Council
is scheduled to adopt the CIP.
Expected Additions to Future CIP Documents
Staff anticipates there will be future factors in 2015 and 2016 that will drive the addition
of projects to the CIP, namely:
1. Completion of the Strom Drain Master Plan is expected 2015;
2. Draft Parks Master Plan will be presented to the City Council on June 30, 2015;
and
3. Update of the City's General Plan is expected to be finalized in FY15-16.
Attachment:
Draft 2015 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (page 4)
3
MP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
FUNDED PROJECTS 10
FIVE YEAR CIP FUNDED LIST 11
ABALONE COVE SEWER DISTRICT REHABILITATION 12
PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH LANDSLIDE 14
PARK SITES 16
PUBLIC BUILDINGS 19
RIGHT OF WAY 27
SANITARY SEWERS 39
STORM WATER SYSTEM 42
TRAILS 47
UNFUNDED PROJECTS 49
UNFUNDED LIST 50
PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH LANDSLIDE 51
PARK SITES 53
PUBLIC BUILDINGS 59
RIGHT OF WAY 63
STORM WATER SYSTEM 74
TRAILS 80
2
5
INTRODUCTION
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a guide toward the efficient and effective provision of public
infrastructure and facilities. Programming capital facilities and improvements over time can
promote better use of the City's limited financial resources, reduce costs, and assist in the
coordination of public and private development. In addition, the planning process is valuable as a
means of coordinating and taking advantage of joint planning and development of facilities and
infrastructure where possible. Careful management of these assets keeps the City poised for
flexible and responsive strategic planning that allows the City to proactively prepare the groundwork
for capital projects so that when funding opportunities arise, a plan is ready to be implemented. By
looking beyond year-to-year budgeting and projecting what, where, when and how capital
investments should be made, capital planning enables public organizations to maintain an effective
level of service for the present and future population.
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP)
The result of this continuing planning process is the CIP, which is the City's mid-term plan for
infrastructure projects. The CIP addresses the City's needs relating to the acquisition, expansion,
and rehabilitation of facilities and infrastructure. The CIP serves as a planning instrument, in
conjunction with the City's General Plan and the City Council's Goals, to identify needed capital
projects and coordinate the financing and timing of improvements in a way that maximizes the
return to the public. It provides a planned systematic approach to utilizing the City's limited financial
resources in the most responsive and efficient manner to meet its service and infrastructure needs.
It serves as the "blueprint" for the future of the community and is a management and planning tool,
rather than a binding document.
The underlying strategy of the CIP is to plan for necessary land acquisition, construction and
maintenance of public facilities necessary for the safe and efficient provision of public services in
accordance with City policies and objectives adopted in the City's General Plan. A critical element
of a balanced CIP is the provision of funds to both preserve or enhance existing facilities and
provide new assets to respond to changing needs and community growth. While the program
serves as a mid-term plan, it is reviewed and revised annually in conjunction with the budget.
Priorities may be changed due to funding opportunities or circumstances that propel a project to a
higher level of importance. Along the way, projects may be revised for significant cost variances.
The CIP is primarily a document that assists in addressing the City's mid-term needs. As such, the
projects and their scopes are subject to change from year-to-year as the needs of the community
become more defined and projects move closer to final implementation. The adoption of the CIP
is neither a commitment to a particular project nor a limitation to a particular cost. As a basic tool
for scheduling anticipated capital projects, it is also a key element in controlling future capital
financing. For this reason, the CIP includes some "unfunded" projects in which needs have been
identified and quantified, but specific solutions and funding sources have not been determined.
When adopted, the CIP provides the framework for the City's management team and the City
Council with respect to investment planning, project planning, and the managing of any City debt.
This document is independent of the City Council's goals and is intended to serve as a mid-term
planning document.
An integrated infrastructure management plan (IMP) is scheduled to be developed in FY15-16 to
determine the impact of different funding strategies/scenarios and prioritization on project delivery
over the course of multiple planning decades. The IMP will consider the maintenance level required
and the useful life for each public asset and will focus particularly on the community's current and
future needs (including public safety and regulatory mandates) and community expectations.
The City is currently engaged in updating the General Plan, the 1989 Parks Master Plan and the
2004 Storm Drainage Master Plan, which are expected to be adopted in FY15-16. These three
master plans will heavily influence the scheduling of projects during the CIP process.
3
9
A City Council -appointed Infrastructure Management Advisory Committee (IMAC) was formed in
FY14-15 to assist in the implementation of the IMP and the use of the infrastructure planning tool.
THE CIP PROCESS
The capital improvement plan and budget is the result of an ongoing infrastructure planning
process. Infrastructure planning decisions must be made with regard to both existing and new
facilities and equipment. For existing facilities, the planning process addresses appropriate capital
renewal strategies and repair -versus -replacement of facilities. New service demands are also
considered, since they often affect capital facility requirements. Planning for the five-year CIP
period and subsequent years, includes linking the General Plan to the capital plan requirements,
conducting needs assessments and allowing for flexibility to take advantage of opportunities for
capital investment. The FY15-16 through FY19-20 CIP is developed through input from
professional staff, citizens of Rancho Palos Verdes, and elected or appointed City officials.
CIP REVIEW TEAM
A CIP Review Team is responsible for annually reviewing capital project requests and providing
recommendations to the City Manager. This team is comprised of staff from the Office of the City
Manager, Finance, Public Works, Community Development, and Recreation and Parks
Departments, and the City Attorney. This team conducts an in-depth analysis of the impact of the
CIP on present and future cash flows and financial obligations, as well as the City's ability to
finance, process, design, and ultimately maintain projects. The Team will also analyze the fiscal
impact for each individual project; including future maintenance and replacement costs, associated
monetary benefits (e.g. future maintenance savings), as well as any applicable future revenue
opportunities. The Team meets periodically throughout the year to evaluate the progress of
projects, and examine future needs of the City.
The overall goal of the CIP Review Team is to develop CIP recommendations that:
■ Preserve the past by investing in the continued upgrade of City assets and infrastructure;
■ Protect the present with improvements to City facilities and infrastructure; and
■ Plan for the future.
Projects are identified by staff, professional consultants, residents and/or elected officials. There
are typically more proposals than can be funded in the five-year CIP period, so the team conducts
an internal project ranking process. The criteria used in this internal ranking includes, but is not
limited to, safety, support of essential City services, support of City Council's goals, economy and
efficiency, outside funding committed (or eligible for), and community quality/sustainability.
Projects are prioritized based on the criteria outlined in this plan in the following section. If a project
receives a lower ranking, it just means that other projects in that period of time are more critical for
the City to address. While ratings are important in determining recommended projects, the realities
of the City's financial situation are critical to all decisions.
CIP CRITERIA
Safety: Enhance or improve the overall safety of the City and delivery of services. Protect the
health and welfare of residents.
Supports Essential City Services: Maintenance and development of existing or new facilities and
infrastructure which allows the City to deliver essential services to residents of Rancho Palos
Verdes.
Supports City Council Goals: Supports the goals established annually by the City Council. Meets
citywide long-term goals and is in compliance with the City's General Plan.
Economy and Efficiency: Maintain and enhance the economy and efficiency of providing services
in Rancho Palos Verdes. This criterion would include projects which improve business processes
and overall efficiency while also evaluating environmental impacts.
Il
7
Outside Funding Committed or Eligible: Support a project for which outside funding has been
committed to or may be obtained through restricted revenue sources.
Community Quality/Sustainability: Maintain and enhance the infrastructure and services which
support our residential and business community. This criterion would include projects which
preserve and enhance the overall quality of life in Rancho Palos Verdes and projects which ensure
economic viability to support the community.
THE CIP CALENDAR
October -December Departments prepare CIP requests
January CIP Review Team reviews requests
February -May Recommendations developed to be included in the Five -Year
Model and Draft Budget
May -June Planning Commission Review
May -June Recommendations presented to the City Council for approval
Additional forms and methods of public outreach will be conducted as directed by the City
Council.
PROJECT LISTS
The CIP includes a comprehensive listing of all projects contained in the Five -Year Plan and also
projects beyond the five-year period. Detailed project sheets are contained in the Plan for all
projects included in the CIP. Another list of unfunded projects is also contained in the Plan to
highlight quantified projects beyond the five-year period. Projects which are included in the CIP
were evaluated based on the criteria approved by the City Council and are in compliance with the
goals set forth in the City's General Plan. Application of these criteria ensures that each project
recommended for Council consideration does indeed support the policy objectives of the City's
long-term planning documents and identifies a basis for scheduling and allocation of resources.
Cost estimates have been developed for each project based on preliminary project descriptions,
and include all estimated costs for land acquisition, permits and inspections, project management
and project engineering, consultant design work, construction, utilities, information technology
infrastructure and other associated project costs. Estimates are based on today's dollars.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT POLICIES
The Finance Department, in cooperation with all other City Departments and the City Attorney,
shall produce a working document designed to identify capital needs annually in conjunction with
the budget process. This Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is submitted to the City Council
to utilize in reviewing and prioritizing capital projects. After adoption by the City Council during the
budget process, the CIP becomes the City's plan for capital improvements for the next five years,
with annual adjustments as needed.
Type of Project
Definitions
Capital asset: An asset with a cost in excess of $5,000 and an expected useful life of more than
one year, such as automobiles, equipment, and furniture. These items will continue to be included
in the operating budget. Items such as automobiles, minor equipment, and furniture will continue
5
to be accounted for and funded using the Equipment Replacement Fund and are not included in
the capital improvement plan.
Capital project: A project expected to have a useful life greater than ten years and an estimated
cost of $100,000 or more. Capital projects include the construction, acquisition, or major renovation
of buildings, roadways, utility systems, or other structures, purchase of land, and major landscaping
projects.
Projects meeting the above definition will be included in the CIP document in addition to the City's
budget document. The information will be tied to the capital budget and totals for each project in
the CIP will be included in the capital budget.
Selecting the Projects for the CIP
The comprehensive capital project planning process has the following essential components:
■ The General Plan (Long-term Plan - 10 Years)
■ The Capital Improvement Plan (Mid-term Plan - 5 Years)
■ The Capital Budget (Short-term Plan - 1 Year)
■ City Council Goals (Long-term and Short-term evaluated each year)
All projects selected for the CIP should be consistent with the goals identified by the City Council
or as outlined in the City's General Plan. The project selection process strives to achieve a
balanced plan for the community to include all necessary and high priority projects, while also
enhancing City services and facilities.
Operating Budget Impact Identified in the CIP
The operating impact of proposed capital projects, including personnel, operating expenditures,
capital outlay, and debt service, as applicable, will be identified in the CIP document and considered
in preparing the annual operating budget and Five -Year Financial Model.
Moving Projects from the CIP to the Capital Budget
All projects approved in the annual capital budget are appropriated at the estimated cost to
complete the project. At the end of each fiscal year, the remaining appropriation for uncompleted
portions of the project will be carried forward to subsequent fiscal years.
Staff will identify the estimated costs, potential funding sources, operating impact, and project
schedule for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to the City Council.
Staff will coordinate development of the capital improvement budget with the development of the
operating budget. All costs for internal professional services needed to implement the CIP will be
included in the capital budget as part of the budget document for the years the CIP is to be
implemented.
Cost tracking for components of the capital improvement program will be updated semi-annually to
ensure project completion against budget and established time lines.
Funding of the CIP Reserve Fund
City Council Policy No. 41 regarding the City's Reserves provides for a minimum CIP Reserve level
of $3,000,000 for emergency projects, the transfer of the total annual Transient Occupancy Tax
(TOT) revenue into the CIP Reserve, and the transfer of any prior year General Fund favorable
expenditure variance to the CIP Reserve. The TOT revenue for FY15-16 is estimated to be about
$5.0 million.
Definition of Capital Budget Year
A capital budget year runs concurrent to the operating budget fiscal year beginning July 1St and
ending June 30tH
0
9
Types of Financing
The nature and cost of the project generally determines the financing options as do projected
revenue. The following financing instruments could be used in the following preferred order:
■ Outside funding that does not require repayment, including grants, federal, state and
county restricted funding (i.e. transportation funding), and donations;
■ Developer Fees;
■ City restricted revenue imposed by voters (i.e. environmental excise tax, storm drain user
fee);
■ Accumulated Fund Balances in Restricted Funds;
■ General Fund;
■ Debt Secured by a Restricted Revenue Source; and
■ General Obligation Debt.
Application of Restricted Funding Sources
It is the City's policy to apply restricted funding sources after a project is completed and final cost
is identified, or at the close of each fiscal year, whichever occurs first.
Evaluation of Capital Projects
Capital project and program reviews are to monitor existing project performance and to update the
Five -Year CIP. Each project must be actively managed and semi-annual reports on the physical
and fiscal status of each project should be made available to the City Council in conjunction with
the budget adoption and Mid -Year Financial Review.
Green Building Standards
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes requires the incorporation of green building principles and
practices into the design, construction, and operation of all City facilities, and to evaluate all land
purchases for future development on the basis of reducing environmental impacts whenever
feasible.
Standards for Maintenance
It is important to have standards in place for the various infrastructure systems throughout the City
to maintain this investment and be positioned to provide adequate services for the residents of
Rancho Palos Verdes. Staff will develop maintenance standards and schedules as appropriate.
Contingency Policy
The need for contingencies will be evaluated with each project and be included in the CIP on a
case-by-case basis.
Project Change Orders
Project change orders will be made in accordance with the policy stated in Section 02.44 of the
Municipal Code.
GENERAL PLAN GOALS
The goals stated below are included in the City's General Plan which serves as the City's long-term
strategic planning tool. All CIP projects should contribute to fulfilling one or more of the goals listed
below.
Natural Environment Element
■ It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect, and enhance its
natural resources, beauty, and open space for the benefit and enjoyment of its residents
and the residents of the entire region. Future development shall recognize the sensitivity
of the natural environmental and be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the
protection of it.
7
HEI
Socio/Cultural Element
It is the goal of the City to preserve and protect its cultural resources and to promote
programs to meet the social needs of its citizens.
Cultural Resources
■ The City shall strive to protect and preserve all significant archaeological, paleontological
and historical resources within the City.
Current Social, Service, and Cultural Organizations
■ Work toward a coordinated program to aid in matching the facility needs of the many and
diverse groups in the community with existing and future facility resources throughout the
City.
Social Services
■ Encourage programs for community involvement, participation, and action to minimize the
sense of isolation and powerlessness felt by many individuals in the community.
■ Encourage programs for recreation, social services, and cultural and educational
achievement.
■ Encourage a framework for interaction among the four cities on the peninsula and between
the peninsula and its surrounding communities to solve common problems.
Urban Environment Element
■ It is the goal of the City to carefully control and direct future growth towards making a
positive contribution to all elements of the community. Growth in Rancho Palos Verdes
should be a cautious, evolutionary process that follows a well -conceived set of general
guidelines, which respond to both holding capacity limitations for the region and
environmental factors on the peninsula.
Activity Areas
■ It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to preserve and enhance the community's
quality living environment; to enhance the visual character and physical quality of existing
neighborhoods; and to encourage the development of housing in a manner which
adequately serves the needs of all present and future residents of the community.
■ The City shall discourage industrial and major commercial activities due to the terrain and
environmental characteristics of the City. Commercial development shall be carefully and
strictly controlled and limited to consideration of convenience or neighborhood service
facilities.
■ The City shall encourage the development of institutional facilities to serve the political,
social, and cultural needs of its citizens.
■ The City shall endeavor to provide, develop, and maintain recreational facilities and
programs of various types to provide a variety of activities for persons of all age groups
and in all areas of the community.
■ Agricultural uses within the City shall be encouraged, since they are desirable for resource
management and open space.
Infrastructure
■ It shall be a goal of the City to ensure adequate public utilities and communications services
to all residents, while maintaining the quality of the environment.
11
■ It shall be a goal of the City to provide residents with a safe and efficient system of roads,
trails, and paths.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to encourage the increased mobility of residents through the
development of an adequate public transportation system.
Safety
■ It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of life and property from both
natural and man-made hazards within the community.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to provide for the protection of the public through effective law
enforcement and fire protection programs.
• It shall be a goal of the City to develop and enforce health and sanitation, emergency
communications, and disaster preparedness programs to ensure the overall health and
safety of all residents.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to protect life and property and reduce adverse economic,
environmental, and social impacts resulting from any geologic activity.
Sensory Environment
■ It shall be the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, through proper land use planning
and regulations, to provide for a quiet and serene residential community with a minimum
amount of restriction on citizen activity.
Palos Verdes peninsula is graced with views and vistas of the surrounding Los Angeles
basin and coastal region. Because of its unique geographic form and coastal resources,
these views and vistas are a significant resource to residents and visitors, as they provide
a rare means of experiencing the beauty of the peninsula and the Los Angeles region. It
is the responsibility of the City to preserve these views and vistas for the public benefit and,
where appropriate, the City should strive to enhance and restore these resources, the
visual character of the City, and provide and maintain access for the benefit and enjoyment
of the public.
Land Use Plan
■ It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to provide for land uses which will be
sensitive to and enhance the natural environment and character of the community, supply
appropriate facilities to serve residents and visitors, promote a range of housing types,
promote fiscal balance, and protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the
community.
Fiscal Element
■ It shall be a goal of the City to hold the property tax to a minimum and to continually explore
and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of alternate or new sources of revenue.
• It shall be a goal of the City to explore cooperative financing strategies that might be
undertaken in association with other jurisdictions.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to take maximum advantage of regulatory legislation to obtain
contributions, dedications, and reservations (i.e., easements).
■ It shall be a goal of the City to ascertain that all revenues generated by growth are sufficient
to cover costs related to growth.
■ It shall be a goal of the City to thoroughly evaluate capital acquisition and operating
expenditures and their impacts before implementation of programs.
E
12
FUNDED PROJECTS
The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs
through various planning processes along with a proposed funding source.
Because the City Council approves CIP projects for the upcoming year, proposed
funding sources could change in subsequent years.
10
13
Rancho Palos Verdes Five Year Capital
33
Safety Council
X
$ 200,000 $1,600,000 Reserve
Identified Funding
Improvement Plan -Funded Projects
Page
Goal
Priority
FY15-16
FY16.17
FY17.18
FY18.19
FY19.20 Source
Abalone; Cove Sewer
X
$ 3,060,000 CIPReserve
50150 Inter -Agency Cost
Western Avenue Traffic Improvements
Abalone Cove Sewer District Rehabilitation
13
X
X
Hawthorne Blvd Corridor Beautification Study
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 900,000 CIPReserve
Palos Verdes Drive South Landslide
38
X
X $ 120,000
$ 120,000 CIPReserve
Landslide Dew atering Well Program
15
X
X
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000 CIP Reserve
Park Sites
Abalone Cove Beach Access Road
17
X
$ 100,000
CIPReserve
Grandview Park Improvements (Phase 1)
18
X
$ 635,000
CIPReserve
Public Buildings
Cityw ide ADA Transition Plan Implementation
20
X
$ 200,000
$ 150,000
$ 150,000
$ 150,000
$ 150,000 EE-7CIP Reserve
Fiber Optic Cabling - Abalone Cove Sew er Lift
Stations/Shoreline Park/Ladera Linda
21
X
$ 1,600,000
CIP Reserve
Ladera Linda Community Center Improvements
22
X
$ 4,000,000
CIP Reserve
Solar Pow er System Hesse Park
23
$ 385,000
Energy Savings Grant
Solar Power System PVIC
24
$ 410,000
Energy Savings Grant
Restricted Donations
PVIC Exhibits
25
$ 455,000
Fund
Civic Center Tennis Court
26
$ 100,000
CIPReserve
Right of Way
General Fund, TDA
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 7
28
X
X
$2,282,000
Article 3 funds
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 8
29
X
X
$ 2,200,000
General Fund
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 3 & 4
30
X
X
$ 2,100,000
General Fund
General Fund, TDA
Residential Street Rehabilitation Zone 5
31
X
X
$2,182,000 Article 3 funds
Measure R, Prop A,
Prop C, STP_, CIP
Arterial Rehabilitation - Crenshaw Boulevard
32
X
X
$ 200,000
$ 2,600,000
Reserve
Measure R, Prop A,
Prop C, STP_, CIP
Arterial Rehabilitation - Indian Peak Road
33
X
X
$ 200,000 $1,600,000 Reserve
HSIP 90%, CIP Reserve
Traffic Safety Improvements - PVDE at Bronco
34
X
X $ 500,300
10%
PVDS Road Way Realignment and Drainage Project
35
X
X
$ 3,060,000 CIPReserve
50150 Inter -Agency Cost
Western Avenue Traffic Improvements
36
X
X $ 3,200,000
Share/CIP Reserve
Hawthorne Blvd Corridor Beautification Study
37
X
$ 150,000 CIPReserve
Pavement Management Program Update
38
X
X $ 120,000
$ 120,000 CIPReserve
Sanitary Sewer
Sew er Capacity Project - Other Locations 40 X
Malaga Canyon - Sew er Improvement 41 X
Storm Drain Lining 43 X
Paintbrush Canyon Drainage Project Study Report 44 X
Storm Drain Point Repairs 45 X
Storm Water Quality Improvement Program 46
Trails
ADA Improvement Projects - Del Cerro Park/Burma
Rd. 48
Totals
X $ 465,000 CIPReserve
X $ 407,000 CIPReserve
WQFP User Fees/CIP
X $ 340,836 $ 347,653 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 Reserve
X $ 120,000 CIPReserve
X $ 900,000 WQFPUser Fees
$ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 CIPReserve
$ 164,408
11
CDBG
14
ABALONE COVE SEWER PROJECT
The Abalone Cove Sewer Maintenance District is a unique system serving 110
developed parcels in an active landslide area, and is maintained by the City.
Sewer user fees are collected from property owners, but are not sufficient to
provide for maintenance and rehabilitation of the system. The Abalone Cove
Sewer Maintenance District is heavily subsidized by the City.
12
15
PROJECT:
ABALONE COVE SEWER DISTRICT
REHABILITATION
TYPE:
Sewer System
LOCATION:
Abalone Cove Sewer District
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Construction of the Abalone Cove Sewer system was completed in
2001 to replace property owner's septic tanks in the active
landslide area of the City. Minimal maintenance has been
performed since that time. Due to the active landslide, the system
is now in need of more substantive rehabilitation and upgrades to
comply with current engineering, operations, and maintenance
standards in Los Angeles County.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Rehabilitation of the system will result in reliable system performance and compliance with state requirements.
This is expected to decrease maintenance costs.
13
16
PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH LANSLIDE PROJECTS
The Palos Verdes Drive South Landslide Projects refers to projects that lessen the
effect of erosion on the Portuguese Bend Landslide, which is the only continuously
active landslide in the United States. These projects are intended to address
landslide movement and public safety risks by using proven methods, such as
runoff diversion, dewatering, and geospatial monitoring.
14
17
INSTALLATION OF LANDSLIDE
PROJECT:
DEWATERING WELLS
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: Portuguese Bend and Abalone Cove
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
Dewatering Wells are a high priority and are considered to be the
most effective method of minimizing runoff from entering the
landslide, which helps slow land movement within the landslide
area. All runoff that percolates into the ground eventually
becomes part of the groundwater and will cause an increase in the
DESCRIPTION: depth of the groundwater table. Removing groundwater through
dewatering wells helps to lower the groundwater table, relieving
soil pressures at depth and minimizing the negative effects
groundwater has on the landslide. These new wells should
improve the system's effectiveness by increasing the system's
water removal capacity and by removing water more rapidly. The
cost to install each well is estimated to be $90,000.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $450,000 $450,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $450,000 $450,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Maintenance costs will be performed as needed. Wells will be installed in high -movement areas. Accordingly,
they may fail quickly and will be re -drilled to continue groundwater removal until a time when groundwater
movement slows. After which time, maintenance costs will be considered.
15
im•
PARK SITES
The development and maintenance of community parks, recreational areas, and
open space has been established as a top priority for the City, as stated in the
General Plan and various other planning documents. The General Plan states,
"It is the goal of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to conserve, protect, and
enhance its natural resources, beauty, and open space for the benefit and
enjoyment of its residents and the residents of the entire region. Future
development shall recognize the sensitivity of the natural environment and
be accomplished in such a manner as to maximize the protection of it."
Many park sites and open space areas have been acquired throughout the City,
and some have been developed for use by the general public. Some sites remain
vacant or underutilized. The City Council approved the Vision Plan in September
2008 which outlines various trail and park projects, which have been included in
this plan. The Public Use Master Plan has also outlined a strategy for the
development of trails. These recreational projects add to the vibrancy of the
community and are designed to contribute to all residents' quality of life. Parks
and other open spaces have been carefully planned to take advantage of the
beautiful coastline and natural landscape of the peninsula.
At its July 29, 2014 meeting, the City Council directed staff to complete an update
of the City's 1989 Parks Master Plan. This update is intended to provide a
comprehensive strategy for addressing the future use of the City's parks,
recreation and open space resources. The updated Master Plan will serve as a
long-range vision for the City's recreation opportunities within a flexible framework
than can be adapted to changes in technology, demographics, economics, and
shifting recreational trends. The draft Parks Master Plan is scheduled to be
presented to the City Council on June 30, 2015.
The update will consolidate plans that currently exist for a number of major park
sites, while being consistent and in compliance with the City's General Plan and
other guiding documents. A review and update of the City's parks inventory will be
a major element as well as an update of the Coast Vision Plan. A dozen public
workshops were conducted between November 2014 and February 2015, in
addition to an online survey which generated over 500 responses.
The Parks Master Plan's precise impact to the CIP is not known at this time. A
number of projects that will likely be part of the final Master Plan document are
probably already part of the current CIP's funded or unfunded categories, while
other recommended projects may not reach the CIP threshold.
m
19
PROJECT: ABALONE COVE BEACH ACCESS
ROAD
TYPE: Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION: Abalone Cove
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
The Abalone Cove Beach access road from PVDS to the beachfront
DESCRIPTION: must be re -graded and re -paved to improve accessibility for
emergency response and maintenance vehicles.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
Maintenance will require new slurry seal every eight (8) years.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The life expectancy of the access road should last approximately 20 years.
17
W,
PROJECT:
GRANDVIEW PARK IMPROVEMENTS
(PHASE 1)
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks & Open Space
LOCATION:
Grandview Park
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The scope of work of the proposed `Phase One' of Grandview
Park includes construction of a natural parking lot,
restrooms/office, play area, picnic area, and some landscaping.
These basic items are chosen from the concept plan option
"Sycamore", which was selected by the City Council.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$75,000
CONSTRUCTION
$560,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$635,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
Impacts to operating budget include: periodic parking lot maintenance ($10,000 /yr.), facility services
($3,000 /yr.), and trash collection ($4,000).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
W
21
PUBLIC BUILDINGS
Buildings and other facility improvements may include any proposed new City
facility or renovation or improvement of any existing City facilities. The City owns
and maintains the following public buildings:
■ City Hall Administration Building at Point Vicente Park
■ City Hall Community Development Building at Point Vicente Park
■ RPV TV Studio Building at Point Vicente Park
■ City Hall trailer leased by Palos Verdes on the Net at Point Vicente Park
■ City Hall Emergency Communications Center trailer at Point Vicente Park
■ Fred Hesse Jr. Community Center Building (John C. McTaggart Hall)
■ Pointe Vicente Interpretive Center (PVIC) at Lower Point Vicente Park
■ Robert Ryan Park Building
■ Ladera Linda Community Center Buildings (5)
■ Buildings at Abalone Cove Shoreline Park, currently used for staffing, public
restrooms, and a nursery school on the beach.
■ Pelican Cove Restroom Building
■ Eastview Park Restroom Buildings
Except for PVIC, these buildings are 25 years old or more and showing signs of
daily use. Many of the facilities were purchased from the school district or
transferred to the City from the federal government. In some cases, little to no
improvements have been made since their acquisition. It is important to perform
adequate maintenance to extend the life of these facilities. It will be necessary to
renovate these buildings as they age to meet the needs of the community and
ensure that all building and safety guidelines are satisfied. PVIC, the most recently
remodeled City facility, was built in 1984 and expanded in 2005. The City Hall
buildings and Ladera Linda Community Center buildings are the best examples of
buildings that are in great need of renovation to meet organizational needs, comply
with safety and code requirements, and comply with all Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) guidelines. The projects listed on the following pages have been
developed based on individual staff assessments, input from the community, and
professional consultants' assessments and studies.
19
22
PROJECT:
CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Various
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
These projects include improvements identified in the Citywide ADA
Transition Plan. The projects for any given year are selected based
on public need and on the degree of severity reported in the ADA
compliance report prepared in 2013.
Project examples would include: accessibility path to Hesse Park
Community Center building; installation of new audible signals at
crosswalks; and building concrete ramps at crosswalks.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$17,500 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
CONSTRUCTION
$182,500 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$200,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Source: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money) and Environmental Excise Tax.
These projects are not expected to have any impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
20
23
21
FIBER OPTIC CABLING: ABALONE
PROJECT:
COVE SEWER LIFT STATIONS/
SHORELINE PARK/LADERA LINDA
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Ladera Linda/Abalone Cove Shoreline Park
DEPARTMENT:
Administration and Public Works
This project includes the installation of fiber optic cabling for unified
communications and data transmission between remote City park
and infrastructure facilities and the Civic Center administration
facility. It is essential to establish communications to Abalone
Cove Shoreline Park, the Abalone Cove Sewer Lift Stations, and
Ladera Linda Community Center. Improved connectivity with
Ladera Linda is essential to provide full communication services to
the eastside community park in conjunction with its rehabilitation.
The entire fiber optic run could occur by a combination of aerial
and underground line placement.
DESCRIPTION:
The project includes running a single line of fiber optic cabling on
its own network from City Hall to Abalone Cove Shoreline Park,
Abalone Cove Sewer lift stations, and on to Ladera Linda
Community Center, with a cost of approximately $1.6M. The work
would entail installing 24-48 strand fiber in 3" conduit within the
public right-of-way along Palos Verdes Drive South by either open
cut or boring construction methods.
Due to challenges with running fiber through the landslide area, the
option of leasing fiber from an Internet service provider between
the Civic Center and Ladera Linda will be included in the scope of
the project. Cox Communications currently has fiber that connects
to users along the road adjacent to Ladera Linda.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $1,600,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $1,600,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Maintenance will be performed when needed. Undisturbed cabling lasts approximately 50 years.
21
22
25
LADERA LINDA PARK & COMMUNITY
PROJECT:
CENTER BUILDINGS REPLACEMENT
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Ladera Linda Park / Community Center
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
The initial stage of this project, for which a budget has been
established, is to create a master plan which will lay the groundwork
for the site's long-term redevelopment and phased implementation.
This stage involves a study of community needs through public
outreach, along with contemplating the City's needs for public service
facilities. This work will be followed by programming, quantifying the
needs, planning and preparing a feasibility report to create a master
plan, which can be phased for design and construction.
The cost calculation for the Ladera Linda Buildings Replacement
project is based on an estimated need for 12,000 square -feet of
DESCRIPTION:
buildings to replace the existing 18,000 square -feet. The anticipated
square -footage could include park restrooms, a staff building,
multipurpose room, activity rooms, discovery room, and a Park
Ranger/Deputy Sheriff drop-in office. Other improvements include
park grounds landscaping and irrigation, picnic tables, benches, and
an emergency generator. The project can be divided into three
phases. The first phase will include hazmat abatement, removal of all
buildings, installation of all utility infrastructures, the construction of
6,000 SF of new building space, park grounds, landscaping and other
improvements. The second and third phase will include 3,000 SF of
new buildings space.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$4,000,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$4,000,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
Phase 1- $4 million in CIP Reserves
Phase II - $1.6 million in CIP Reserves
Phase III - $1.6 million in CIP Reserves
Total Cost: $7.2 million
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Current maintenance costs would cease. As the new facility ages, maintenance costs will rise.
22
25
PROJECT:
SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR HESSE
PARK BUILDING
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Hesse Park
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating
systems over the roof of Hesse Park to reduce power consumption,
with occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid. This project will
help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce considerable
amounts of emissions. Typically, the energy savings can cover the
cost of projects of this scale over an estimated period of 15 to 20
years.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$35,000
CONSTRUCTION
$350,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$385,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: Fully funded with an Energy Savings grant (federal/state)
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Potential electricity savings is about $18,000 annually. The life of the system is expected to be 20-25 years.
Solar system components are generally under warranty for 10-12 years.
23
26
PROJECT:
SOLAR POWER SYSTEM FOR POINT
VICENTE INTERPRETIVE CENTER
PVIC
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
PVIC
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of lightweight and advanced solar energy generating
systems over the roof of PVIC to reduce power consumption, with
occasional opportunities to sell power to the grid. This project will
help the City with its energy savings goal and will reduce
considerable amounts of emissions. Typically, the energy savings
can cover the cost of projects of this scale over an estimated period
of 15 to 20 years.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$35,000
CONSTRUCTION
$375,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$410,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding: Fully funded with an Energy Savings grant (federal/state)
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
I I ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Potential electricity savings is about $20,000 annually. The life of the system is expected to be 20-25 years.
Solar system components are generally under warranty for 10-12 years.
24
27
PROJECT:
POINT VICENTE INTERPRETIVE
CENTER EXHIBITS
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION:
Point Vicente Interpretive Center
DEPARTMENT:
Recreation & Parks/Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Private restricted donations have been collected for enhancements
to the PVIC museum exhibits.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$455,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$455,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: Private Restricted Donations.
should not impact the operating budget.
Exhibit maintenance will be at a nominal cost; and therefore,
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
25
QQ•
PROJECT:
CIVIC CENTER TENNIS COURT
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Civic Center
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Removal and replacement of the Civic Center tennis court to a
suitable location.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Source: Quimby fees.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
01
29
RIGHT OF WAY PROJECTS
Roadway infrastructure is one of the most widely used major capital investments
of a municipality. Without a well-maintained street system, the transportation
needs of the public, business, industry, and government cannot be met. The roads
are also part of a critical public safety need, as they contribute to the general health
and welfare of the community. Maintaining quality roadway infrastructure is also
important for maintaining property values. It has been shown that property values
tend to suffer from adjacent poorly maintained streets. Roadway infrastructure
includes residential streets, arterial streets, and traffic safety improvements. In the
City of Rancho Palos Verdes, there are 44.3 miles of arterial streets and 104.2
miles of residential streets. The total of all streets and alleys mileage is 148.5
centerline miles.
To manage the City's residential and arterial streets, the City hires a consultant
who conducts a full -detailed assessment of all streets once every three years. This
report, known as the Pavement Management Program (PMP), helps to identify any
serious issues and provides the City with a rating for each street. The report
includes the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The City of Rancho Palos
Verdes maintains a minimum standard for PCI for a municipal street system at 80.
The City's current PCI is 81.8 based upon the PMP report prepared by Bucknam
Infrastructure Group, Inc. in 2013. Since 1997, the City has maintained a
pavement rating between 80 and 90. The report also helps in defining a schedule
to complete the work. The City has been divided into nine zones for residential
streets, but in the case of some areas, zones may be completed together in one
year for added efficiency.
27
W
PROJECT:
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Zone 7
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City's Pavement Management Plan, Zone 7 of the
residential rehabilitation program is scheduled for implementation
during the FY15-16 budget cycle. This project will include micro-
surfacing, slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root removals, and ADA
compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks in Zone 7. This
infrastructure enhancement will also include updating traffic signs,
striping, curb painting, house numbering, and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$2,282,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$2,282,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $82,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY
SERVICES
X
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY16-17. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good Condition."
LOCATION PHOTO
LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 7: The Ladera Linda community, Ganado Area,
streets near Mira Catalina School, San Ramon and Calle
Aventura.
28
31
PROJECT:
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Zone 8
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City's PMP, Zone 8 of the residential rehabilitation
program is scheduled for implementation during the FY16-17 budget
cycle. This project will include micro-surfacing, slurry seal, overlay, curb
repair, root removals, and ADA compliance updates of the streets and
sidewalks in Zone 8. This infrastructure enhancement will also include
updating traffic signs, striping, curb painting, house numbering, and
monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 6
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $2,200,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 6 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY
SERVICES
X
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY17-18. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good Condition."
LOCATION PHOTO LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 8: Residential neighborhoods off of Palos Verdes
Drive East in the northern and eastern parts of the City.
i
29
32
PROJECT:
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Zones 3 & 4
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
As part of the City's PMP, Zones 3 & 4 of the residential rehabilitation
program are scheduled for implementation during the FY18-19 budget
cycle. This project will include micro-surfacing, slurry seal, overlay, curb
DESCRIPTION:
repair, root removals, and ADA compliance updates of the streets and
sidewalks in Zones 3 & 4. This infrastructure enhancement will also
include updating traffic signs, striping, curb painting, house numbering,
and monument surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$2,100,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$2,100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY
X
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SERVICES
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential
street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY18-19. This project is
funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good Condition."
LOCATION PHOTO
LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 3: Residential streets north of Silver Spur Rd and
east of Hawthorne Blvd, including the Blackhorse
community, Silver Arrow, Longhill, and Beechgate.
Zone 4: Residential streets bordering Crenshaw Blvd
and Crest Road, including the Sea Crest, Sea Breeze,
Island View, and Ridgecrest communities.
�9b�A�Dk�
30
33
PROJECT:
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Zone 5
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
As part of the City's PMP, Zone 5 of the residential rehabilitation program
is scheduled for implementation during the FY19-20 budget cycle. This
project will include micro -surfacing, slurry seal, overlay, curb repair, root
DESCRIPTION:
removals and ADA compliance updates of the streets and sidewalks in
Zone 5. This infrastructure enhancement will also include updating
traffic signs, striping, curb painting, house numbering, and monument
surveying.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $2,182,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $2,182,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: General Fund and TDA Article 3 of approximately $82,000
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY
X
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SERVICES
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is part of the annual residential street overlay and slurry seal program and is scheduled for
completion in FY19-20. This project is funded by the General Fund, and has a goal to achieve a pavement
condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good Condition."
LOCATION PHOTO
LOCATION DESCRIPTION
Zone 5: Residential streets in the most
part of the City, off Hawthorne and between Crest and
PVDW.
f
31
34
PROJECT: ARTERIAL REHABILITATION -
CRENSHAW BLVD
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Crenshaw Blvd.
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
As part of the City's PMP, the Crenshaw Blvd. arterial will be
DESCRIPTION: resurfaced. The project will include milling and overlay, roadway
patching, crack filling, curb and gutter repair, sidewalk repair, and
ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $200,000
CONSTRUCTION $2,600,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $200,000 $2,600,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Proposition A, Proposition C, CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money),
Measure R funds, and/or State Transportation Local Program funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X I COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The project goal would result in a pavement condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good
Condition."
jai
x�
� 1 r
'I
32
35
ARTERIAL REHABILITATION - INDIAN
PROJECT:
PEAK ROAD
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Indian Peak Road
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
As part of the City's PMP, the Indian Peak Road arterial will be
DESCRIPTION: resurfaced. The project will include milling and overlay, roadway
patching, crack filling, curb and gutter repair, sidewalk repair, and
ADA upgrades.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4
YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN $200,000
CONSTRUCTION
$1,600,000
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $200,000
$1,600,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: Proposition A, Proposition C, CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money),
Measure R funds, and/or State Transportation Local Program funds.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The project goal would result in a pavement condition of 86 or higher, which is considered "Very Good
Condition."
33
36
PROJECT:
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT
BRONCO DRIVE
TYPE:
Traffic Improvements
LOCATION:
PUDE at Bronco Drive
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve portions of PVDE to provide wider travel lanes in each
direction, a shared -use equestrian and pedestrian path located
behind the existing guardrail, a high visibility equestrian crossing
at Bronco Drive complete with flashing beacons, augmented
crossing signage and advanced crossing signage with flashing
beacons, and installation of safety barriers and railing to reduce
vehicle collisions and cross-over accidents.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$500,300
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$500,300
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be determined at the conclusion of design and construction.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Staff has secured an HSIP grant that requires a 10% local match from CIP Reserve funds (General Fund
money).
LOCATION PHOTO
MAP
34
37
PROJECT:
PVDS ROADWAY
REALIGNMENT
TYPE:
Roadway Project
LOCATION:
PVDS
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The project would re -align approximately 1.6 miles
of Palos Verdes Drive South, which is located
within and traverses the Abalone Cove,
Portuguese Bend, and Klondike Canyon
Landslides. The location of the roadway is
constantly moving as the sub -soils within the
landslide move. Extensive grading is needed to re-
establish (relocate) the roadway within the right-of-
way.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1
YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$3,060,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$3,060,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X
OUTSIDE FUNDING
COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Project design of $245,000 was appropriated in FY13-14.
Realignment of PVDS was last performed around 1988.
35
•
PROJECT:
WESTERN AVENUE TRAFFIC
IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Western Avenue
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The Western Avenue Task Force group was formed, consisting of
City of RPV, City of LA, and Caltrans staff. Since its inception, the
working group completed a Western Avenue Corridor Study in
2007, which is a strategic action plan that:
• Identified the current and future deficiencies in the multi -modal
transportation system within the corridor; and
• Recommended consensus -based solutions (including required
strategies) to address the deficiencies.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$3,200,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$3,200,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Minimal impact to operating budget since right-of-way is primarily maintained by Caltrans. The City is responsible
for trees, graffiti, and trash removal. Requirements of the Ponta Vista development project may mitigate some
of the traffic needs identified in 2007.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
This project is eligible for Measure R funding through the South Bay Highway Program administered through the
South Bay Council of Governments.
WESTERN CORRIDOR
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
a s�iwen
LAMmmumx..u.a.:e
36
39
PROJECT:
HAWTHORNE BLVD RIGHT OF WAY
BEAUTIFICATION
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Hawthorne Blvd (City Hall to Northerly City Limits)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Development of a plan to make beautification improvements to the
City's right-of-way along Hawthorne Blvd that would include
landscaping and masking of blight conditions created by failed
fences, walls, and other private facilities. The medians in this area
will be improved by landscape and/or hardscape enhancements.
This allocation would fund a design and plan for these improvements,
which have a preliminary cost estimate of $2.2 to $2.6 million.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$150,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$150,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
37
all
PROJECT:
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
(PMP) UPDATE
TYPE:
Intangible Capital Outlay
LOCATION:
N/A
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The PMP is updated every three years to evaluate the condition of the
City's roadway system and to identify Citywide Arterial and
Residential Street Rehabilitation projects. The Metropolitan Transit
Authority (Metro) requires the PMP update in order for the City to
continue receiving Proposition C funds.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$120,000 $120,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$120,000 $120,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR
CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
W
41
SANITARY SEWER PROJECTS
The City's sanitary sewer system is essential to City operations, yet it has not
required significant expenditures in past years due to an inter -local agreement with
Los Angeles County for maintenance of the system. The City owns the system,
but the County has the primary responsibility for ongoing maintenance of the
system, which does not include the Abalone Cove Sewer system. The County
collects a sewer fee from the City's property owners, which is used to maintain the
system. Although the County maintains the sewer system, the City retains
responsibility for its operation, public safety, and welfare. The City, not the County,
maintains legal and regulatory responsibility (i.e., any state or federal fines
resulting from spillage).
The City conducted a survey of the system, and in 2004 and updated that survey
in 2009 through the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update, which was created to
help in the management of this asset. The study examined sample areas
throughout the City and assessed the overall system as "fair." The inspection
revealed root intrusion and cracking in the pipes, in addition to accumulated fats
and grease clogging certain areas. It appeared that the County had not been
performing preventative maintenance in prior years. Without regular maintenance,
overflows due to root and grease blockages will occur. To minimize the potential
for overflow and to restore and maintain the system in "good" condition, a
significant investment in pipeline inspection, repair, and maintenance was
performed by the County. The County has completed a full inspection and
cleaning of all RPV sewer mains. Problem areas are being properly maintained
and/or are scheduled for repair through larger projects.
The projects identified herein were included in the City's Wastewater Master Plan
Update, which was completed in 2009 to address potential locations of under -
capacity (the ability of the existing pipe to convey sewage flows without overflowing
into the street). Further physical investigation will be made before contracting for
construction of repairs. Planned projects may change once physical inspections
are performed. The County maintenance and repair program does not provide for
replacement of pipeline due to capacity issues.
IYA
PROJECT:
SEWER CAPACITY PROJECT- OTHER
LOCATIONS
TYPE:
Sewer System
LOCATION:
Various
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Several smaller locations throughout the City may require repairs.
The 2009 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan indicated that unidentified
sections of the City's sewer system may be under capacity. The
Plan indicates that these projects could replace 1,951 feet of 8 -inch
sewer pipe with 12 -inch vitrified clay pipelines.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$75,000
CONSTRUCTION
$340,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
$50,000
LEGAL
TOTAL
$465,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked Number 8 out of the 8 identified capital improvement projects in
the plan.
.X
43
PROJECT:
SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT -
MALAGA CANYON
TYPE:
Sewer System
LOCATION:
N/A
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This section of the City's sewer system has been determined to be
under capacity. This project will replace 1,850 feet of 10 -inch sewer
pipe. The pipe will be replaced with a 15 -inch vitrified clay
pipeline. The pipeline runs behind properties in Malaga Canyon,
parallel to Basswood Avenue between Mossbank Drive and Mazur
Drive. This section of pipeline is over capacity when analyzed,
considering the factor of safety flow run.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$59,000
CONSTRUCTION
$335,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
$13,000
LEGAL
TOTAL
$407,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
As funding becomes available, projects should be performed in the order they are ranked in the Wastewater
Master Plan Update. This project is ranked number 5 out of the 8 identified capital Improvement projects in
the plan.
41
EM
STORM WATER SYSTEM
The 2004 Update to the 1998 Master Plan of Drainage identified 38 potential
projects, excluding storm drain lining, that staff would need to address in the City's
storm drain system. Staff has addressed all or portions of these projects and has
added other projects to the lists. A new Master Plan of Drainage was
commissioned to provide a comprehensive and current analysis of the drainage
needs in the City in consideration of the work already done and new engineering
standards promulgated by the LA County Flood Control District. The new Master
Plan will be finalized in 2015. Staff expects the new Master Plan will identify
additional projects to correct pipes with deficient capacity, poor physical condition,
or both.
Staff has also conducted a thorough video inspection of the entire City -owned pipe
inventory and has compiled the results for analysis. This will lead to identifying
lining needs for the coming years. While it is not clear yet which pipes will be
programmed for lining first, the need is clear. The following table depicts the
overall observations made of the City -owned pipes. About 23% of the City's pipes
(about 26,800 linear feet) have a condition rating of 3 or worse. Of this amount,
about 18,300 linear feet are corrugated metal pipes (CMP) and would rank at
highest priority for lining. In time, all CMP should be lined and reinforced concrete
pipe (RCP) with condition defects will need to be addressed on an individual basis
to determine if lining will resolve the issues.
Storm Drain Video Inspection Summary
42
W,
-
_ ___..
__ -----
-. -
Level
i
Condition
Linear Feet
% of Total
% CMP
I Number I
Inspected
% RCP
15% CMP
Level 0
Good77,997
67%
'
I
- -
85% /° RCP
- -
Light/minor
30% CMP
Level 1
defect ;
7,631
7%
70% RCP
j
Moderate
C
35% CMP
Level i
E ---- C
defect
- -- -
4,059
-- -
3% --
- --
o-- ---
65 /o RCP
Average,360
-
40% CMP
Level 3
defec
_ ..__
6% . _
--- .
--
60% RCP
I
,. _.._r_ ---
-- _
60% CMP
Level 4
Heavy defect
6,966
6% L
40% RCP
--- - ---_ - : --
0% CMP
Level 5
Severe defect
12,475
11%
90
j
0
/° RCP
L
-..._. -- --.._ . _ - -
__--_--_ . _.___-.:..:.
...._. -_--.. _. __-..:.. .. ........
___.-_ ....___
Total Linear
Footage
116,488
100%
42
W,
PROJECT:
STORM DRAIN LINING
TYPE:
Storm Drain System
LOCATION:
Project Area 12
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
All Corrugated Metal Pipe storm drain lines within the City have
reached their design life expectancy and need to be lined to extend
their life another 30+ years. CMP dating back to the 1940s has been
DESCRIPTION:
discovered and requires rehabilitation, along with those most
recently installed in the 1970s. A large number of drainage
problems citywide can be overcome by relining deteriorated pipes
and improving inlet and outlet structures.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$340,836 $347,653 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$340,836 $347,653 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: WQFP
user fees through FY15-16 and the CIP Reserve funds (General
Fund money) thereafter. Ongoing maintenance costs should decrease, as pipes which have been lined
generally require less maintenance, resulting in a cost savings. Because the Storm Drain User Fee sunsets in
FY15-16, lining projects will compete with other infrastructure rehabilitation projects for funding from the CIP
Reserve in the future.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
LOCATION PHOTO
MAP
t � i
43
210
M"
47
PAINTBRUSH CANYON DRAINAGE
PROJECT:
PROJECT STUDY REPORT
TYPE:
Storm Drain System
LOCATION:
Project Area 11
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
The Project Study Report is expected to include: 1) a study of the
drainage area; 2) a study of the drainage needs; 3) multiple design
alternatives; 4) identification of environmental requirements; 5)
DESCRIPTION:
identification of right-of-way needs; and 6) a recommended scope
for development of an engineering design leading to construction
of drainage improvements. Any improvements to drainage in
Paintbrush Canyon will be complex due to right-of-way and
landslide issues.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$120,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$120,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: WQFP user fees and CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Preventing runoff water from entering the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project is expected to help slow movement within the Portuguese Bend landslide,
eventually affecting the land movement on Palos Verdes Drive South.
M"
47
PROJECT:
STORM DRAIN POINT REPAIR
PROJECTS
TYPE:
Storm Drain System
LOCATION:
Citywide
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
During the 2012 Storm Drain Lining and Rehabilitation Project,
several pipes were unable to be lined due to local structural failure
of the pipes. This project will provide funds to correct the deficient
locations in these pipes to prepare them for lining in the future.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION $900,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL $900,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: WQFP user fees.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Many of these point repairs are difficult to access and may require acquisition of temporary or permanent
access easements to address current and future maintenance needs. Locations include Santa Rena pipe
inlet, Enrose Avenue CMP, Via Colinita north of Maine, Vista Mesa, and PVDE at Marion Drive.
LOCATION PHOTO
MAP
r
* Point Repair Projects —
Legacy from 2012 Lining Project
*
45
STORM WATER QUALITY REGIONAL
PROJECT:
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TYPE:
Storm Water Quality Project
LOCATION:
TBD
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
In order to comply with the new MS4 permit requirements, the
Peninsula cities will work together to address storm water quality
issues by developing an Enhanced Watershed Management Plan
(EWMP), including the development of structural treatment
DESCRIPTION:
projects. This provides an estimate of the City's share of the cost
to build these Storm Water Quality Improvement projects. The first
phase projects must be built within 30 months of when the MS4
permit is received. Scope and timing of future phases will be
determined upon approval of the EWMP by the Regional Storm
Water Quality Board.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding and/or Grant Information: CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5
YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Required as part of MS4 Permit Enhanced Watershed Management Plan. Locations to be determined once
pollutant monitoring studies are analyzed.
The City will have an ongoing commitment to additional projects in
the future. In the absence of more defined information, a placeholder of $100,000 annually has been included
as the City's contribution to other storm water quality projects.
TRAILS
The City of Rancho Palos Verdes began planning for a non -motor vehicle
transportation circulation system for pedestrians, equestrians, and bicyclists, as
early as the adoption of the City's General Plan in 1975. In the early years after
the city's formation, it was recognized that trails are an integral part of the city's
circulation system and play an important role in contributing to the successful
interaction of residential, institutional, commercial and recreational zoning districts
within the city, while encouraging recreational and fitness opportunities.
As such, on November 27, 1984, the City Council adopted the Trails Network Plan,
which was intended to serve as an advisory tool for City decision -makers for the
implementation and funding of City trails. As a means of implementing the Trails
Network Plan, on January 22, 1990, the City Council adopted the Conceptual Trails
Plan (CTP) and Conceptual Bikeways Plan (CBP) as two separate documents.
Collectively, the CTP and CBP serve as the City's Trails Network Plan (TNP). The
CTP was revised on May 21, 1991, September 16, 1991, and October 26, 1991.
The CBP was revised on October 15, 1996.
The TNP has not been updated since the mid-1990s. In the past few years, the
City has actively sought to acquire and preserve permanent open space as a part
of the stewardship of these City -owned lands. In 2008, the City adopted the
Preserve Trails Plan (PTP) for the properties that make up the Palos Verdes
Nature Preserve. Also, in 2008, the city developed a trails plan for the Coast Vision
Plan, which is "a modern vision to unify the City's coast through design," providing
a framework of connectivity of public amenities within and adjacent to the City's
coastal zone.
The City recently began to update and consolidate all of its existing trails plans and
documents into a single, comprehensive plan. As a part of the preparation of the
update to the TNP, the City is conducting a series of public workshops to reach out
to community stakeholders and interested persons to identify any unique trail
issues that should be addressed in the TNP update (with the exception of the PTP
approved by the City Council in 2008).
47
a
PROJECT:
ADA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
DEL CERRO PARK / BURMA RD.
(CDBG)
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Del Cerro Park / Burma Rd.
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project will provide ADA accessibility to Del Cerro Park / Burma
Rd. area through the construction of curb ramps and sidewalks at
one of the City's key access points to the Nature Preserve.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 6
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
$34,000
CONSTRUCTION
$130,408
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
$164,408
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Source: CDBG grants. There is no expected impact to the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
51
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
The following projects are those which have been identified as capital needs
through various planning processes, but currently there are no identified financial
resources to complete the projects. As funding becomes available and the City
Council prioritizes and approves projects, they may be moved into the funded Five -
Year CIP schedule. Additional projects will be identified in 2016, through the
development of the Infrastructure Management Plan (IMP), formation of the
Infrastructure Management Committee (IMAC), and completion of the General
Plan and Parks Master Plan.
EM
52
RPV Capital Improvement Plan - Unfunded Projects
Potential Safety City Council Cost Range
Project Page Funding Goal Priority Minimum Maximum
Palos Verdes Drive South Landslide
Landslide Early Warning System
52
300,000
300,000
Park Sites
Restroom at Del Cerro Park
54
250,000
300,000
Lower Point Vicente Park Improvement
Project
55
1
x
1 2,400,000
2,400,000
Civic Center Skate Plaza
56
x
650,000
750,000
Coast Vision Plan -
Trailhead/Overlook/Vista Point
Development
57
x
800,000
1,040,000
Concrete Stairs at Ladera Linda &
Hesse
58
x 1
140,000
180,000
Public Buildings
Citywide ADA Transition Plan
Implementation
60
x
x
4,520 000
41520,000
Point Vicente Park Community Center
61
x
3,000,000
8000 000
Corporation Storage Yard Relocation
62
300,000
300,000
Right of Way
Hawthorne Blvd. Median Improvements
Via Rivera to City Hall
64
250,000
250,000
Lower Point Vicente Park Access
Modification Project PVDW at PVIC
65
x
x
x
250,000
300,000
Crenshaw Blvd Extension Parking
Improvements
66
x
125,000
150,000
Hawthorne Blvd. Right of Way
Beautification
67
x
2,200,000
2,600,000
Hawthorne Blvd. Bike Lane Gap Closure
68
1 x
x
1,200,000
1,500,000
Traffic Safety Improvements - PVDE at
Miraleste Drive
69
x
x
x
200,000
300,000
Utility ndergrounding Crenshaw
70
x
x
1,200,000
2,000,000
Utility Undergrounding at 25th Street
71
x
x
1,000,000
1,100,000
Utility Undergrounding at Entrance to
PVIC
72
x
x
150,000
200,000
Utility Undergrounding at PVDS and
Terranea Way
73
x
x
1
150,000
200,000
Storm Water System
Altamira Canyon
75
x
x
1,600,000
5,350,000
Paintbrush Canyon Drainage
76
x
x
2,568,000
2,568,000
PVDE - Miraleste Canyon
77
x
x
2,500,000
3,200,000
San Pedro & Averill Canyons
78
x
x
2,700,000
3,300,000
Catch Basin Screen Installation
79
x
x
600,000
900,000
Trails
Preserve Trail Plan - New Trail
Implementation
81
x
x
150,000
150,000
California Coastal Trail Improvements 1
82
x 1
223,000
223,000
Totals (Min. and Max.);
$ 29,426,000
$ 42,081,000'
50
53
PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH LANDSLIDE
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
51
6�
PROJECT: LANDSLIDE EARLY WARNING
SYSTEM (LEWS)
TYPE: Landslide Project
LOCATION: Palos Verdes Drive South in the Portuguese Bend Landslide Area
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
The main sewer trunk line owned and operated by the Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County, and which serves a significant
portion of the residential properties in RPV, parallels the PVDS
roadway above ground in the landslide area. Both facilities require
constant maintenance due to landslide movement, which poses a
significant operational hazard should the landslide experience rapid
land movement. Closure of these facilities would be highly disruptive
DESCRIPTION: to the city's economic vitality, transportation, public health and
safety, and use of public open space and trails. Sewer overflows
from the trunk line could potentially threaten the ecosystems of the
nearby Pacific Ocean coastline. A landslide early warning system
(LEWS) would provide critical advanced knowledge of changed
landslide conditions by alerting public safety and public works first -
responders, who would be able to respond sooner and more
proactively with public safety information and preventative
measures.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
It is estimated that LEWS annual operations and maintenance cost would be approximately $30,000 per year,
which would include scheduled on-site equipment inspection and fees for wireless or satellite communication
systems.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Sensors placed in the area would transmit data through a
wireless or satellite -based system to a web -hosted application 4,
designed to send alerts to public safety and public works first- ,,..WWO&
responders when specified land movement criteria is reached.
Many of the existing dewatering wells may be suitable for i ioum lPC
sensor deployment. The first responders would then be M"„ ,»•ro„
afforded more time to notify users of the public open space and
trails in the area, mobilize equipment, establish roadway
detours and alternative sewer conveyance, all of which is
Mweurlre SnMms a,N 4nawa
intended to protect the public and the environment. There are
partnership possibilities with the Sanitation Districts of LA
County and the LA County Sheriffs and Fire Departments.
Estimated Cost: $300,000.
52
55
PARK SITES
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
53
56
PROJECT:
RESTROOM AT DEL CERRO PARK
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION:
Del Cerro Park
DEPARTMENT:
Recreation and Parks/Community Development
DESCRIPTION:
This project would include the construction of a restroom at Del
Cerro park to serve the park visitors and the users of the trails in
the Portuguese Bend Open Space area.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000 - $300,000
M
+L
PROJECT:
LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TYPE:
Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION:
Lower Point Vicente
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The park improvement plan for Lower Point Vicente derives from
an extensive public outreach process associated with the City
Council's adopted Vision Plan. The scope of work consists of
constructing new decomposed granite trails, overlooks,
reconfigured and new parking spaces (including a new upper
terrace parking lot), drainage facilities (including a bioswale),
landscaping, fencing, way finding signs and minor site grading to
accommodate the improvements (excavation cannot occur in
areas capped for lead remediation.)
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD Project not expected to begin until FY22-23.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,400,000.
55
PROJECT:
CIVIC CENTER SKATE PLAZA
TYPE:
Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION:
Point Vicente Park
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works & Recreation and Parks
DESCRIPTION:
This project could include construction of: 1) a 15,000 square -foot
skate plaza; 2) a restroom; 3) appropriate parking and benches;
and 4) landscaping. If a skate plaza is determined to be a feasible
use through the program of utilization that controls the site, staff
will continue to work with the City Council and local skate advocate
groups to provide funding for this facility.
The plaza/skate area would be constructed of concrete with
complimenting walkways, stage, handrails, planters, landscaping,
a restroom building, and parking.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Annual facility maintenance is currently estimated to be $13,000. Additional staffing and security may be
necessary to operate the facility.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $650,000 - $750,000.
Private funding may become available for project construction and ongoing maintenance.
56
ME
57
COAST VISION PLAN
PROJECT:
TRAILHEAD/OVERLOOK/VISTA POINT
DEVELOPMENT
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION:
Various Locations
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works/Community Development
The Vision Plan identifies the construction of trailheads at key
entrances to the existing City trail system, along with overlooks and
vista points within the Vision Plan project area. The trailheads would
consist of a permeable surface pad, a bench, a plastic bag kiosk for
dog owners, trash and recycling receptacles, signage, a
freestanding kiosk for trail notices, small native trees for shade, and
pockets of native shrubs, where appropriate. The overlook/vista
points would be placed on decomposed granite or other permeable
material, with flush stone edging and could include a semicircle
DESCRIPTION:
bench, a stone pilaster displaying pertinent information, a stone clad
wall less than 3 -feet in height and pockets of native shrubs.
Phase 1 would involve a trailhead at Shoreline Park/251h Street and
overlooks/vista points at Inspiration Point and Eagles Nest. Phase 2
would involve trailheads and overlook/vista points at the cul-de-sac
next to St. Paul's Church, Del Cerro Park, and the end of Ocean
Terrace. Phase 3 would involve a trailhead at the
Switch backs/PVD E Turnout and overlook/vista points at the
Switch backs/PVD E Turnout, Paintbrush Canyon/Burma Road, and
Burma Road above Gateway Park.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $100,000 to $130,000 per site x 8 sites = Range of $800,000 - $1,040,000
57
PROJECT:
CONCRETE STAIRS AT LADERA
LINDA AND HESSE PARKS
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Various
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Replacement of the wooden stairs at Ladera Linda Park and Hesse
Park is desired to minimize tripping hazards and introduce
uniformity to the stair tread lengths and heights at these two
locations.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $140,000 - 180,000
M
61
PUBLIC BUILDINGS
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
59
62
ralm
ADCI
CITYWIDE ADA TRANSITION PLAN
PROJECT:
IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Various
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
The Citywide ADA Transition Plan, adopted by the City Council on
June 4, 2013, identified total costs of $11.85 million for
implementation. The cost estimate included improvements to ADA
compliance at the Civic Center (buildings and grounds) totaling
$1.36 million, and those at Ladera Linda Park totaling $1.72 million.
Any future improvements at these sites are expected to bring the
facilities into ADA compliance. Additionally, the total cost of $11.85
DESCRIPTION:
million includes right-of-way improvements totaling $2.64 million,
including curb ramps and bus stops. Those improvements will be
addressed as part of each roadway rehabilitation project. The
remaining identified costs of $6.12 million will be addressed through
an annual implementation allocation that began in FYI 3-14. Project
costs "funded" through FYI 9-20 total $1.60 million. The remaining
portion of the $5.97 million, which has not been moved to the
"funded" list is included here.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $4,520,000
Environmental Excise Tax (EET) funding may become available.
ralm
ADCI
PROJECT: POINT VICENTE PARK COMMUNITY
CENTER
TYPE: Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION: Point Vicente/Civic Center
DEPARTMENT: City Manager/Public Works
Originally studied by the Open Space Planning, Recreation and
Parks Task Force in 2004, the concept for this facility was later
refined during the redevelopment of the Coast Vision Plan. Adopted
DESCRIPTION: by the City Council in 2008, the latest concept calls for a 20,000
square -foot community center that could accommodate meeting
space for community groups, recreational facilities, classroom
space, and a full-sized recreational pool.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Impact will need to be assessed, as projects are considered.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $3,000,000 - $8,000,000
A private donation of $100,000 has been made and additional donations and/or other outside funding may
become available based upon the scope of the project.
61
62
AN•
CORPORATION STORAGE YARD
PROJECT:
RELOCATION
TYPE:
Buildings and Other Facility Improvements
LOCATION:
Various Locations throughout the City
DEPARTMENT:
City Manager/Public Works
It has been proposed that City maintenance services be spread out
citywide in strategic locations with a central office at City Hall. The
existing corporation/storage yard is located on the Point Vicente
Park site, which had been identified for various other community
uses due to its prime location.
DESCRIPTION:
It may be feasible to create a central location for the storage yard
with satellite locations throughout the City, serving the storage and
construction needs of the Public Works Department. The central
location of the storage yard will be situated at or near City Hall for
administrative purposes. This central location will control all
satellite locations through the use of maintenance personnel and
through the efficient use of the City's computer system network.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY X
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The satellite locations will fulfill the following roles: there will bean office trailer at each location; a construction
yard for contractors located throughout the City (possibly generating rental income for the City); possible
satellite EOC centers for access throughout the City; and storage space for various City equipment items.
Estimated Cost: $300,000
62
AN•
RIGHT OF WAY
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
63
••
PROJECT:
HAWTHORNE BLVD. MEDIAN
IMPROVEMENTS (VIA RIVERA TO
CITY HALL)
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Hawthorne Blvd. (Via Rivera to City Hall)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The development of this median would include installing draught
tolerant landscaping, which would require minimal maintenance.
Development will also include the installation of irrigation systems
and controllers, hardscape, and decorative stone.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed. However, a rough estimate of annual maintenance is about 10% of the total project cost.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000
E
67
PROJECT:
LOWER POINT VICENTE PARK ACCESS
MODIFICATION PROJECT
TYPE:
Traffic Improvements
LOCATION:
PVDW/PVDS at Lower Point Vicente Park Entrance
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve access into and out of the Lower Point Vicente Park area by
restricting turn movements to right turn only out of the site at the southern
entrance/exit to minimize vehicle conflicts while negotiating turn
movements.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $250,000 - $300,000
Highway Safety Grant funding may become available.
65
PROJECT:
CRENSHAW BOULEVARD EXTENSION
PARKING IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Crenshaw Blvd (Valley View Rd to Burma Rd)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
In an effort to improve safety, parking and access to the Nature
Preserve entrance near Del Cerro Park, parking improvements and
restrictions are needed to accommodate the growing user demand
and need for emergency vehicle access.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 7 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $125,000 - $150,000
�
3
W
PROJECT:
HAWTHORNE BLVD RIGHT OF WAY
BEAUTIFICATION
TYPE:
Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION:
Hawthorne Blvd (City Hall to Northerly City Limits)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The City's right-of-way along Hawthorne Blvd will be beautified by
landscaping and masking blight conditions created by failed fences,
walls and other private facilities. The medians in this area will be
improved by landscape and/or hardscape enhancements. A study
has been funded in FY14-15 to identify options and cost estimates.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Unknown at this time. Impact would be contingent on level of beautification and project components.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5
YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,200,00 - $2,600,000
67
70
PROJECT: HAWTHORNE BLVD BIKE LANE GAP
CLOSURE
TYPE: Roadway Infrastructure
LOCATION: Hawthorne Blvd (Vallon Drive to Dupre Road)
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
This project will improve roadway safety and complete a bike lane
DESCRIPTION: gap closure that exists due to on -street parking demand, roadway
configuration, and existing median barriers.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Striping refreshing is minimal and would be funded out of the FY15-16 operating allocation.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,200,000 - $1,500,000
Highway Safety Grant funding may become available.
M
so
71
PROJECT:
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS -
PALOS VERDES DRIVE EAST AT
MIRALESTE DRIVE
TYPE:
Traffic Improvements
LOCATION:
PVDE at Miraleste Drive
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Improve intersection operations to create improved traffic flow and
vehicle and pedestrian safety. Operational improvements could
include a roundabout. If a traffic signal was considered, the cost
estimate would increase; however, and Marymount College would
likely fund a small share of the project's cost.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
If a traffic signal is contemplated, annual maintenance cost could be about $7,000.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $200,000 - $300,000
Highway Safety Grant funding could become available.
72
PROJECT:
CRENSHAW BLVD UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT
TYPE:
Public Utilities
LOCATION:
Crenshaw Blvd at Crest Road
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
The project will underground overhead utility lines along Crenshaw
Blvd south of Crest Road. This project qualifies for Rule 20A funding.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
There is no impact on the operating budget. This project would be entirely funded by Rule 20A work credits.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,200,000 - $2,000,000
70
73
PROJECT:
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT 25TH
STREET
TYPE:
Public Utilities
LOCATION:
25th Street
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and the
coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The City
will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,
communications, etc.) to relocate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison's (SCE's) Rule 20A Funding, which accumulates
at a rate of about $80,000 per year. The balance of this funding has been preliminarily committed to a project on
Crenshaw Blvd in FY19-20.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $1,000,000 - $1,100,000
71
74
PROJECT:
UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT
ENTRANCE TO PVIC
TYPE:
Public Utilities
LOCATION:
Palos Verdes Drive South (at PVIC)
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and the
coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The City
will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,
communications, etc.) to relocate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison's (SCE's) Rule 20A Funding, which
accumulates at a rate of about $80,000 per year. The balance of this funding has been preliminarily committed
to a project on Crenshaw Blvd in FY19-20.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON
5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000 - $200,000
72
75
PROJECT: UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AT PVDS
AND TERRANEA WAY
TYPE: Public Utilities
LOCATION: PVDS and Terranea Way
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
This project includes the removal of overhead wires and the
DESCRIPTION: coordination of undergrounding all utilities at this location. The City
will coordinate with the associated utility companies (electrical,
communications, etc.) to relocate all wires underground.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
This project could be funded through Southern California Edison's (SCE's) Rule 20A Funding, which
accumulates at a rate of about $80,000 per year. The balance of this funding has been preliminarily committed
to a project on Crenshaw Blvd in FY19-20.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000 - $200,000
73
76
STORM WATER SYSTEM
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
WE
77
PROJECT: ALTAMIRA CANYON
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Project Area 4
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
A project within lower Altamira Canyon to aid in slowing the damage
being caused by storm water runoff through the entire reach of the
Canyon is needed. The installation of Gabion-type erosion control
structures within lower Altamira Canyon are needed to help control
DESCRIPTION: runoff velocities and minimize erosion within the canyon.
This project includes the installation of protective measures to
minimize further erosion in Altamira Canyon. This project could
range from stabilization at bends in stream beds, with limited
velocity controls, to channel stabilization.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Note: The Altamira Canyon project has been studied and analyzed over the past decades; however the need
to minimize runoff from entering the ground in Altamira Canyon still remains. A project study report has been
funded for FY14-15.
This estimate does not include right-of-way costs. A previously designed and funded project was abandoned
due to right-of-way issues and owners lack of support.
Estimated Cost: $1,600,000 - $5,350,000
75
w
PROJECT: PAINTBRUSH CANYON DRAINAGE
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Portuguese Bend
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
The Paintbrush Canyon Drainage System project will capture runoff
at the head of the Portuguese Bend landslide in three locations,
DESCRIPTION: transfer that runoff via surface-mounted High Density Polyethylene
(HDPE) pipe under Palos Verdes Drive South, (through an existing
steel tunnel), and continue the flow along the existing storm drain
pipe alignment to the ocean.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Preventing runoff water from entering the landslide has been shown to directly affect land movement in
landslide areas. This project is expected to help slow movement within the Portuguese Bend landslide,
eventually affecting the land movement at Palos Verdes Drive South. A project study report has been proposed
for FY19-20.
Estimated Cost: $2,568,000
76
79
PROJECT:
PVDE- MIRALESTE CANYON
TYPE:
Storm Drain System
LOCATION:
Project Area 5
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Work within this project area includes storm drainage systems
along Palos Verdes Drive East at the northern end of PVDE, South
Coach, Rocking Horse, Clevis, North Colt, South Colt, Via Canada,
and South Via Canada. This project includes the installation of a
number of pipelines and re -setting surface drainage systems to
drain into Miraleste Canyon.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X
OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X
COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,500,000 - $3,200,000
77
PROJECT:
SAN PEDRO & AVERILL CANYONS
TYPE:
Storm Drain Systems
LOCATION:
Project Area 6
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
DESCRIPTION:
Work within this project area would include storm drainage systems
at Miraleste, South Miraleste, North Corsini, Via Colinita, La Vista,
Vista Mesa, and a curb and gutter project on Via Frascati. This
project would include the installation of a number of pipelines and
regrading of roads and surface drainage systems to drain into the
San Pedro and Averill Canyons. A project at Miraleste Plaza has
been completed.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
TBD
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES
X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 - $3,300,000
CATCH BASIN SCREEN
PROJECT:
INSTALLATION
TYPE: Storm Drain System
LOCATION: Citywide
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
In order to comply with certain water quality regulations imposed
by the Regional Water Control Board, the City will need to install
catch basin screens to prevent trash and debris from entering the
DESCRIPTION:
Santa Monica Bay and LA Harbor. It is not clear yet how many of
the City's catch basins will require the retrofit or how intense the
implementation scheme will be.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
Funding Information: WQFP (Storm Drain User Fee) Fund and CIP Reserve funds (General Fund money).
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY X ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
The City has installed these screens in about 100 catch basins (for the Machado Lake watershed) at a recent
cost of about $700 each (not including permitting). There are up to 1,200 catch basins remaining that may
require this retrofit. Estimate cost: $600,000 - $900,000.
jjr `F, \.
VS
b. t5tt�r t 7}d}tt t tt r lt! ft5i: 5 7514
..-r .:1}}'s';•h'°lyr7',9P"'.,.tr It r tr`,
Y ...t... r... ,.t..4
}�%1 ................ .}t l 7S 7t is
"yt SYy•fti•}S: Sett ttt .........Fr. f�•
+ �.t SYS'};�G1{•4YSttt Stat:}}t}}t{'t}S S.
'�t-t'°•1SkS�t1�
_
l�lvfr'ytsl :t
SSS}•�.S Vyi 'Slit
i�'.L341S
qq,,��yySqq. �,
79
TRAILS
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
:e
81
PRESERVE TRAILS PLAN - NEW
PROJECT:
TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION
TYPE:
Recreation, Parks, & Open Space
LOCATION:
Palos Verdes Nature Preserve
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development/Public Works
In October 2012, the City Council adopted an updated Preserve
Trails Plan (PTP) for the NCCP's Palos Verdes Nature Preserve,
which identifies trail routes and trail uses within the Preserve.
Pursuant to the approved management agreement between the
City and PVPLC, PVPLC is responsible for maintenance and repair
of existing unimproved trails in the Preserve, while the City is
responsible for the construction of new trails identified in the PTP.
DESCRIPTION:
According to the PTP, there are three approved trail routes that
currently do not exist and need to be constructed at some point by
the City. Since projects are moving forward on two of the three new
trails needed (the Smugglers Trail in the Abalone Cove Reserve
and the Switchback Trail in the San Ramon Reserve), construction
of the Crystal Trail (.12 mile) in the Forrestal Reserve remains as
the only new trail that needs construction.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE X
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $150,000
If a trail improvement is considered to be a critical link, outside grant funding may become available. If the trail
improvement is in the right-of-way,
then potential funding may become available through the Active
Transportation Program (ATP).
81
PROJECT:
CALIFORNIA COASTAL TRAIL
IMPROVEMENTS
TYPE:
Recreation Parks & Trails Improvements
LOCATION:
PVDW — Marguerite Drive to Calle Entradero & PVIC Blufftop
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works & Recreation and Parks
DESCRIPTION:
Two sections of the California Coastal Trail near the Point Vicente
Interpretive Center (PVIC) and Oceanfront Estates are paved with
asphalt that has deteriorated. This project would replace the asphalt
with decomposed granite, enhancing the aesthetic value of the
California Coastal Trail within the City.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES (IF KNOWN)
CATEGORY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
ACQUISITION
ENGINEERING/DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGEMENT/OVERSIGHT
LEGAL
TOTAL
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
To be assessed.
JUSTIFICATION FOR INCLUSION ON 5 YEAR CIP
SAFETY
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY
SUPPORTS ESSENTIAL CITY SERVICES X OUTSIDE FUNDING COMMITTED/ELIGIBLE
SUPPORTS CITY COUNCIL GOALS
X COMMUNITY QUALITY/SUSTAINABILITY X
OTHER PROJECT INFORMATION:
Estimated Cost: $223,000
M
AM
•