Loading...
RPVCCA_CC_SR_2015_05_05_04_Letters_Opposed_Proposed_LA-RICS_MonopoleMEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CAROLYNN PETRO, AICP, DEPUTY CITY MANAGE DATE: MAY 5, 2015 SUBJECT: LETTERS IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED LA-RICS MONOPOLE AT UPPER POINT VICENTE REVIEWED BY: DOUG WILLMORE, CITY MANAGER (/A,^� Project Manager: Kit Fox, AICP, Senior Administrative Analyst RECOMMENDATION Consider authorizing the Mayor to sign letters to the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and other interested agencies and persons, expressing the City's opposition to the proposed monopole for the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System (LA-RICS) project on the Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City Council continued its deliberations in this matter on April 7, 2015, to get additional details about the LA-RICS proposal at Upper Point Vicente, and to reach out to surrounding neighborhoods. LA-RICS' consultants have met with Staff to discuss the specifics of the proposal, and Staff has sent courtesy notification to surrounding homeowners' associations. Therefore, Staff presents this matter for further City Council consideration and direction. BACKGROUND The City Council previously considered taking a formal position in opposition in the proposed LA-RICS monopole on the Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente at the meeting of April 7, 2015. This monopole would be part of the voice (i.e., LMR) component of the LA-RICS system. However, in late correspondence present to the City Council that evening, LA-RICS asked for the matter to be continued, and provided some additional 1 MEMORANDUM: Opposition Letters for LA-RICS Monopole May 5, 2015 Page 2 information about the proposal. The City Council directed Staff to work with LA-RICS to "flesh out" the details for its proposal at Upper Point Vicente, and to reach out to homeowners' associations in surrounding neighborhoods to advise them of this proposal. On April 22, 2015, LA-RICS' consultants met with Staff at the site. Staff was provided with general, verbal descriptions of the scope of the proposed LMR project, and was subsequently provided with the attached document which includes a preliminary project plan. On April 23, 2015, Staff sent a courtesy notice to the homeowners' associations for the Oceanfront Estates, Villa Capri, La Cresta Pointe and Sunset Ridge neighborhoods, advising them of the City Council's consideration of this matter at tonight's meeting. These four (4) neighborhoods surround and/or overlook Upper Point Vicente. DISCUSSION Project Description The April 7t" letter from LA-RICS indicated that the damaged "40 foot guyed tower" would be "replaced" with a "modern steel tower." The letter also indicated that "there are two other towers that can be removed from service if this new tower is installed." At the time, it was not clear what the height of the replacement tower would be, nor was it clear where the additional towers to be removed were located. Therefore, on April 15, 2015, Staff invited LA-RICS and/or its consultants to meet at the site to clarify the scope of the proposed project. This site meeting was held on April 22, 2015.1 Attached to tonight's Staff report is a presentation received from LA-RICS on April 28, 2015 entitled "Land Mobile Radio System — Point Vicente Tower Site." The site meeting and the attached presentation clarifies that there are two existing wooden towers on the property (identified as Pole 1 and Pole 2). Based on the site meeting and the attached presentation, the proposed LMR project would include the following components: Replacement of the eighty foot (80') tall guyed wooden pole (Pole 1) with existing Coast Guard and County antennas with a new seventy foot (70') tall steel monopole, of an unspecified diameter (probably at least eighteen inches (18") across) Installation of a fifteen foot (16) tall lightening rod on top of the new monopole, for an overall maximum structure height of eighty five (85') feet 1 During the April 22nd site visit, it was noted that the existing antennae on the Coast Guard property are non-functional since the coaxial cables connecting them to the equipment inside the bunker have been severed. Based upon photographs taken by Staff in September 2014, it appears that these antennae have not been functional for at least the past eight (8) months, and possibly for much longer. 2 MEMORANDUM: Opposition Letters for LA-RICS Monopole May 5, 2015 Page 3 • Installation of a total of three (3) parabolic dishes on the new monopole. One dish (2' in diameter) installed at a height of twenty five feet (25') and two dishes (2' and 4' in diameter, respectively) installed at fifty five feet (55') above the ground. • Installation of a total of three (3) omnidirectional whip antennae on the new monopole. One (1) whip antenna installed at thirty feet (30') in height and two (2) whip antennae installed at sixty feet (60') above the ground. • Installation of antenna equipment and back-up generator, ideally inside of the existing bunker • Connection of antennae to equipment via coaxial cable, ideally in an underground trench • Installation of security fencing around new monopole • Removal of the guyed wooden pole with no existing antennae (Pole 2) While some of the project parameters are generally known (as listed above), a number of factors remain unknown, subject to additional technical analysis and coordination with the Coast Guard. These include, but are not necessarily limited to: • Will the Coast Guard and/or the County functional antennae on the new monopole? • Will the Coast Guard permit the removal want to include their existing, non - of the second guyed pole from their property? • Is it technically feasible to install the antenna equipment and/or back-up generator in the existing bunker? • Will the new monopole require lights and/or markings in order to comply with FAA regulations? • To what extent will sensitive biological and historical resources on the Coast Guard property be affected by the construction and operation of the new monopole? Neighborhood Outreach Four (4) homeowners' associations (HOAs) surrounding Upper Point Vicente have been notified of the City Council's consideration of this matter. These HOAs were similarly notified by Staff in September 2014 about the preparation of a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the LA-RICS project. The Oceanfront Estates HOA acknowledged receiving the previous notice regarding the proposed monopole at Upper Point Vicente. Since the second notice was mailed on April 23, 2015, the La Cresta Pointe HOA has submitted the attached email strongly objecting to the proposed project. Any further communications received after the preparation of this staff report will be provide to the City Council through later correspondence. 9 MEMORANDUM: Opposition Letters for LA-RICS Monopole May 5, 2015 Page 4 Draft Opposition Letter Staff appreciates the additional project details that LA-RICS has been able to provide up to this point. However, Staff does not believe that this additional detail alleviates the City's concerns about the project's impacts upon aesthetics and visual character, biological resources or historic resources. Therefore, the attached draft opposition letter to the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other interested agencies and persons, remains the same as previously presented to the City Council at the April 7t" meeting. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LA-RICS LTE System Changes On April 14, 2015, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved a scaled-down proposal for the wireless broadband (i.e., LTE) component of the LA-RICS system (see attached Board letter). The reduced project has eliminated LTE sites previously proposed at County Fire Station No. 83 in Miraleste Plaza and the County antenna farm on Crestridge Road, as well as at other County fire stations on the Palos Verdes Peninsula. However, these changes do not affect the proposed LMR sites that are being proposed at several locations, including the Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente. Status of Draft EIR for LA-RICS LMR System In September 2014, Staff submitted comments on the scope of the draft EIR being prepared for the LMR component of the LA -RIGS system. Staff's scoping comments largely mirrored the issues that are raised in the draft opposition letter presented for the City Council's consideration at tonight's meeting. Staff has been advised that the draft EIR might be released for public review and comment in the near future. At that time, the City would have the opportunity to respond to LA-RICS' assessment of the environmental impacts of the LMR system, both at Upper Point Vicente and at two (2) other proposed locations in the City. If the Draft EIR is release soon, the City Council may wish to hold off taking a formal position regarding the Upper Point Vicente site (and other sites) until after Staff has had the opportunity to thoroughly review the Draft EIR. However, if the Draft EIR is not released soon, there is probably no benefit in waiting to make the City Council's concerns about the LMR monopole at Upper Point Vicente known. CONCLUSION In conclusion, Staff recommends that the City Council consider authorizing the Mayor to sign letters to the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other interested 11 MEMORANDUM: Opposition Letters for LA-RICS Monopole May 5, 2015 Page 5 agencies and persons, expressing the City's opposition to the proposed LA-RICS monopole on the Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente. ALTERNATIVES In addition to the Staff recommendation, the following alternative actions are available for the City Council's consideration: 1. Do not authorize the Mayor to sign opposition letters regarding the proposed LA- RICS monopole on the Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente. 2. Defer taking a formal position on the proposed LA-RICS monopole until the Draft EIR for the LA-RICS LMR system is released for public review and comment. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with authorizing the Mayor to sign letters opposing the proposed LMR monopole at Upper Point Vicente. During Staff's meeting with LA- RICS on March 11, 2015, it was noted that the LA-RICS Board would be considering another alternative for the funding plan for the system, this one to be based upon the number of "subscribers" (i.e., data units and radios) used in and/or by each participating jurisdiction rather than the population and geographic area of participating jurisdictions. If this change is approved by the LA-RICS Board, it remains unclear if this new formula will come any closer to providing the City with a meaningful estimate of the full cost of its participation in LA-RICS. The adoption of a revised funding plan may (or may not) result in a further extension of the "opt out" period. Staff expects to return to the City Council with a further update on the status of the LA-RICS funding plan sometime before November 24, 2015 (i.e., the end of the current "opt out" period). Attachments: • Draft Opposition Letter regarding LA-RICS monopole at Upper Point Vicente (Page 6) • Diagram of Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente (Page 8) • Land Mobile Radio System Point Vicente Tower Site from LA-RICS (received 4/29/15) (Page 9) • Late Correspondence from LA-RICS (received 4/7/15) (Page 17) • Previous City Council Staff report (dated 4/7/15) (Page 20) • Board of Supervisors report (dated 4/14/15) (Page 24) • Correspondence from La Cresta Pointe HOA (dated 4/28/15) (Page 27) MAMunicipal Services\Emergency Communications\LA-RICS\20150505_LA-RICSMonopoleOppositionLetters_StaffRpt.docx 5 May 5, 2015 [addressee] [agency] [street address] [city, state & ZIP] SUBJECT: Opposition to Proposed LA'-RICS Monopole on U.S. Coast Guard Property at Upper Point Vicente in Rancho Palos Verdes Dear [addressee]: As you may (or may not) be aware, the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) authority is proposing to install a 70- to 180 -foot -tall antenna structure (monopole or lattice tower)on U.S. Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The 4.50 -acre Coast Guard property is surrounded by the City's Point Vicente Park/Civic Center property at 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard. On behalf of the City Council and residents of Rancho Palos Verdes, I write to express our deep concerns about LA-RIC'S'.selection of this location for the installation of an antenna tower, in hopes that you may be able to assist the City in eliminating it from further consideration. Our specific objections include: • The proposed location for this antenna tower is a visually -prominent site surrounded by the City's civic center and a portion of its nature preserve. There are also residential neighborhoods surrounding this site where ocean views would be degraded by the addition of an antenna structure and related support equipment. The addition of an antenna structure and related support equipment is also likely to degrade the character of the open space areas surrounding this site. The City believes that the construction and operation of the proposed antenna tower is likely to have significant adverse impacts upon scenic vistas and the visual character of the site and its surroundings. As mentioned above, the proposed location for this antenna tower would be surrounded by the Alta Vicente Reserve of the City's Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. The nature reserve property is enrolled as a part of the City's Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP). The City believes that construction and operation of the proposed antenna tower is likely to have significant adverse impacts upon sensitive species and habitat, and that it may conflict with our NCCP. Al • • The proposed antenna location would be on the site of an existing World War II - era bunker and the remains of gun batteries at Point Vicente. The bunker and batteries are associated with Fort MacArthur in San Pedro. Furthermore, the surrounding civic center property is a former, Cold War -era Nike missile base, which includes the intact missile silos. Finally, the site would be located within a Y2 -mile radius of the Point Vicente Lighthouse, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The City believes that the construction and operation of the proposed antenna tower is likely to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical or archaeological resource, either on the project site or nearby. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes expects to continue to participate in the CEQA review process for this proposed antenna site, including the submittal of comments on the Draft EIR once it is released. We hopeful that LA-RICS will not attempt to circumvent the CEQA process for this proposed location by seeking to apply the special, temporary CEQA exemption granted to LA-RICS by the State legislature in 2012. It is clear to the City that there are numerous "unusual circumstances that apply to this site that would make the application of a categorical exemption from CEQA completely indefensible. trust that that the City of Rancho Palos Verdes may rely upon your support to ensure that LA-RICS' proposal for an antenna tower at Upper Point Vicente is never brought to fruition. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to Senior Administrative Analyst Kit Fox in the City Manager's Office at (310) 544-5226 or via e-mail at kitf@rpvca.gov. Sincerely, Jim Knight Mayor cc: Rancho Palos Verdes City Council Doug Willmore, City Manager Carolynn Petru, Deputy City Manager Kit Fox, Senior Administrative Analyst Pat Mallon, Executive Director, LA-RICS Wendy Stallworth-Tait, Executive Assistant, LA-RICS MAMunicipal Services\Emergency Communications\LA-RICS\20150505_LA-RICS_UPVOppositionLetter.docx 7 m I � O � wVU r� NO v O E E O U 0 .;a n!• M V '� DC Q O L N 0 .;a n!• GE® O v v � O — u O V CO e O 4- V O u v v E v J J N +, O +, O O Ou 07 4-c ro vUl O ca u u 07 L v ca 00 V)4 -JO F- > ro Lr) v N O N aJ ul N +- N O U o v v p O +� O u E +� U ro a m I Q I I I • oaf•II A Lu .GN o OD 4-j CL t U U Oi � 0� O N O UJ 0 OXw N W O • Ul bn Ul c cZ0 L- 4 LU 4—JO CID 11 d�McNQn • Ul bn Ul c cZ0 L- 4 LU 4—JO CID 11 .r 0 00 v 0 0- El � a� m c O L Un L CL) c Z3 O 4J x v r -i cv m d Ln 12 N QL cr W N O U E E O U N C U i m O Q E Q1 � v v O O O Q rl O N N � N O a E a- f0 V v J 13 LU O "O J N N a -J O E -C a o c U v a °° a o J � = v 00 O N � L v -a Q a--� > Z O�o O N z Q v= c E— Q L ON N j w °o ° a) v Q w ao u LL c h- � a Q O N 3= o owc �'' = z m x �. o N w (Yi E d• Q O �i a � i I i v v 14 N 0 r - N Z U N L N 1✓ a1 U +-+ C O a. o ern u1 u1 l0 111 Lr) N N 0 L � m a m a X cn U U a 4 O 4_ cu U4-J > 1✓ U_ rn N Cr N m > Q o s U U U Q cl U K a O O O Q J O t T 15 m m m a O a a a`.. 0 L � m a m a cn U U a O O O 4 cu U4-J > 1✓ U_ ate+ C U c U Up > Q o s Q cl U K A 1 1 1 Q J O t T 15 a LAA-RICS PATRICK J. MALLON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR April 7, 2015 LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY 2525 Corporate Place, Suite 100 Monterey Park, California 91754 Telephone: (323) 881-8291 http://www.la-rics.org The Honorable Jim Knight 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 Dear Mayor Knight: SENT CORRESPONDENCE BY: E-MAIL We were made aware today of a pending item on the City Council agenda to oppose an installation of an Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority (LA-RICS) monopole at Upper Point Vicente (Point Vicente). We respectfully request that the item be continued as there appears to be a major misunderstanding with regard to the construction of 70 foot — 180 foot poles or towers. The LA-RICS Program is proposing to replace an existing 40 foot guyed tower at Point Vicente that has a broken guyed anchor support and is in need of repair. The tower is dangerous to climb and maintain and needs to be replaced. Through the Land Mobile Radio (LMR) Project the faulty tower can be replaced with a modern steel tower. The facility will be upgraded to modern standards and will be operationally safe to maintain. As part of this implementation there are two other towers that can be removed from service if this new tower is installed. LA-RICS has been in contact with the land -owner, the Coast Guard, and they are in favor of this plan. There are distinct advantages to replace the tower: 1. It will be safe for installation and maintenance programs. 2. It will reduce the number of tower poles currently operating at the site and reduce clutter at the site. 3. It replaces an alternate site initially proposed at Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall site. 4. The mountain top facility provides public safety radio coverage throughout the Rancho Palo Verdes area and Catalina Island. 5. It provides the Public Safety community a redundant microwave ring that will protect the public safety system against multiple radio system failures. 17 The Honorable Jim Knight April 7, 2015 Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Fritz Rote at (434) 229-8159 or at frote(cD-fedeng.com Respectfully submitted, PATRICK J. MALLON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WST:pI XAPriscilla Larat2015 Correspondence\Mayor of Rancho Palos Verdes letter 04 07 2015 docx Enclosure c: Rancho Palos Verdes City Councilmembers • P P- j �Aol ION\ t Nit CITYOF MEMORANDUM ,i,NCHO PALOS VERDES TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CAROLYNN PETRO, AICP, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 7, 2015 SUBJECT: LETTERS IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED LA-RICS MONOPOLE AT UPPER POINT VICENTE REVIEWED BY: DOUG WILLMORE, CITY MANAGER Project Manager: Kit Fox, AICP, Senior Administrative Analyst RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Mayor to sign letters expressing the City's opposition to the proposed monopole for the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System (LA-RICS) project on the U.S. Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente. BACKGROUND In March 2009, the City Council executed a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) authorizing the City's membership in the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) Authority. LA-RICS was established to engage in a region -wide cooperative effort to plan and establish a wide -area interoperable public safety communications network. When commissioned, the system is intended to provide first responders with the technology to communicate, in real time, to coordinate their response during times of emergency. The system is expected to include a network of Land Mobile Radio (LMR) sites (i.e., voice) and Public Safety Broadband Network -Long Term Evolution (LTE) sites (i.e., data). The system assumes the need to install a 70 -foot -tall monopole (or equivalent) or a 180 -foot -tall lattice tower (or equivalent) at each LTE and LMR site. At present, LA-RICS has identified four (4) proposed antenna sites in the City (i.e., Fire Station No. 83 in Miraleste Plaza for an LTE site, the County "antenna farm" on Crestridge Road for both LTE and LMR sites, the FAA radar facility at the top of San Pedro Hill for an LMR site, and the Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente for an LMR site). Staff last reported to the City Council on LA-RICS in the Weekly Administrative Report of April 1, 2015. As the City Council may recall, the LA-RICS Board of Directors adopted a funding plan for the system on May 28, 2014. With this action, LA-RICS initiated a 180 -day "opt out" period during which participating jurisdictions could withdraw from the JPA without financial obligation. The "opt out" period was originally set to end on November 24, 2014. 20 MEMORANDUM: Opposition Letters for LA -RIGS Monopole April 7, 2015 Page 2 However, since both Staff and the Emergency Preparedness Committee had serious reservations about the City's continued participation in LA -RIGS, Staff presented a resolution to the City Council on August 19, 2014 to consider withdrawing from the JPA. At the last minute, LA-RICS agreed to a 1 -year extension of the "opt out" period (now set to end on November 24, 2015) and waived of any financial obligation by participating jurisdictions for FY 2014-15. Therefore, the City Council agreed to take "wait and see" position on the City's continued participation in LA-RICS. On March 11, 2015, LA-RICS provide Staff with a status update on several components of the project, including the following: • In late January 2015, the County issued the building permit for the LTE monopole at Fire Station No. 83 (FS 83) in Miraleste Plaza. Since that time, there appears to have been little visible evidence of construction. At the March 11th meeting, Staff was advised that the FAA has "flagged" the building permit, and installation of the monopole at FS 83 is on hold until this issue is resolved with the FAA. We have asked LA-RICS to keep us apprised of any changes to the FS 83 installation that may arise from the FAA's review. • LA-RICS had previously proposed an LTE monopole at Fire Station No. 53 (FS 53) on Palos Verdes Drive South, which would have required the City to issue a coastal permit. At the March 11th meeting, LA-RICS advised Staff that FS 53 is no longer included in the LA-RICS proposal for either LTE or LMR systems. As mentioned above, LA-RICS also proposes to establish a countywide land mobile radio (LMR) system for emergency voice communications. In September 2014, Staff submitted comments on the scope of the environmental impact report (EIR) being prepared for the LMR system. The LMR system proposes three (3) antenna sites in the City: the County "antenna farm" on Crestridge Road, the FAA site at the top of San Pedro Hill and the Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente (which is surrounded by City Hall and the nature preserve). LA-RICS Staff has advised us that the County -owned Crestridge Road site has been determined to be exempt from CEQA, and will proceed under County permits for both LMR and LTE installations in advance of the completion of the EIR. The other two (2) sites—which are both located on Federal property—are not expected to be exempt from CEQA, and should be addressed in the Draft EIR. LA-RICS anticipates that the Draft EIR could be released by late spring/early summer 2015. Staff intends to review and comment upon the Draft EIR once it is released. The Palos Verdes Peninsula News recently reported on the controversy that LA-RICS' proposed LTE/LMR monopole at Fire Station No. 56 (FS 56) in the City of Rolling Hills has raised in that community. At its meeting of March 9, 2015, the Rolling Hills City Council passed a resolution on a 3-2 vote, stating its opposition to this proposed monopole. It should be noted, however, that Rolling Hills' position with respect to FS 56 is similar to our position with respect to FS 83, which is exempt from both our City's zoning and building regulations and CEQA because it 21 MEMORANDUM: Opposition Letters for LA-RICS Monopole April 7, 2015 Page 3 is County -owned property and covered by LA-RICS' temporary CEQA exemption (granted by the State legislature in 2012). Mayor Knight has expressed serious concerns about the LMR monopole proposed for the Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente. As such, he has asked Staff to prepare letters expressing the City's opposition to this specific proposal, to be addressed to the Coast Guard, Federal and State resource agencies and other appropriate agencies and legislators in advance of the release of the Draft EIR for the LA-RICS LMR system. Staff has prepared a draft opposition letter for the City Council's consideration. DISCUSSION The draft opposition letter reiterates the points raised by Staff in our scoping comments for the Draft EIR last September. The primary issues of concern to the City are the incompatibility of a proposed monopole on this site with the sensitive habitat in the surrounding Alta Vicente Reserve, and with significant historic resources both on-site (i.e., Battery 240 and the WWII -era bunker) and nearby (i.e., the Point Vicente lighthouse and the Nike missile base). Staff believes that the presence of these biological and cultural resources at or near the project site will make it very difficult (if not impossible) for LA- RICS to successfully argue that the proposal at Upper Point Vicente would be exempt from CEQA. However, even with the preparation of an EIR, the LA-RICS Board will have the ability to consider adopting a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" in order to approve any proposed installation that would have significant and unavoidable adverse impacts upon the environment. By expressing the City's concerns about the LA-RICS proposal at Upper Point Vicente directly to other Federal and State agencies that may have a role in reviewing this proposal, we are hopeful to bring pressure upon LA-RICS to drop this site from consideration. Staff is still compiling and list of agencies and person to whom this letter would be sent, but a particular list is expected to include the following: • U.S. Coast Guard • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service • California Department of Fish & Wildlife • National Register of Historic Places • California Office of Historic Preservation • U.S. Congressman Ted Lieu • State Senator Ben Allen • State Assemblymember David Hadley Staff would appreciate suggestions from the City Council for any additional recipients for this letter. 22 MEMORANDUM: Opposition Letters for LA-RICS Monopole April 7, 2015 Page 4 CONCLUSION In conclusion, Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign letters expressing the City's opposition to the proposed LA-RICS monopole on the U.S. Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente. ALTERNATIVES In addition to the Staff recommendation, the following alternative actions are available for the City Council's consideration: 1. Do not authorize the Mayor to sign opposition letters regarding the proposed LA- RICS monopole on the U.S. Coast Guard property at Upper Point Vicente. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with authorizing the Mayor to sign letters opposing the proposed LMR monopole at Upper Point Vicente. During our meeting with LA-RICS on March 11th, it was noted that the LA-RICS Board would be considering another alternative for the funding plan for the system, this one to be based upon the number of "subscribers" (i.e., data units and radios) used in and/or by each participating jurisdiction rather than the population and geographic area of participating jurisdictions. If this change is approved by the LA-RICS Board, it remains unclear if this new formula will come any closer to providing the City with a meaningful estimate of the full cost of its participation in LA-RICS. The adoption of a revised funding plan may (or may not) result in a further extension of the "opt out" period. Staff expects to return to the City Council with a further update on the status of the LA-RICS funding plan sometime before November 24, 2015 (i.e., the end of the current "opt out" period). Attachments: • Draft Opposition Letter for regarding LA-RICS monopole at Upper Point Vicente MAMunicipal Services\Emergency Comm unications\LA-RICS\20150407_LA-RI CS Mon opo leOppositionLetters_StaffRpt.docx 23 SACHI A. HAMAI Interim Chief Executive Officer April 14, 2015 County of Los Angeles CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street, Room 713, Los Angeles, California 90012 (213) 974-1101 http://ceo.lacounty.gov The Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Los Angeles 383 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Supervisors: REQUEST TO APPROVE THE LA-RICS AUTHORITY CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (ALL DISTRICTS) (3 VOTES) SUBJECT Board of Supervisors HILDA L. SOLIS First District MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS Second District SHEILA KUEHL Third District DON KNABE Fourth District MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH Fifth District Recommendation for approval of Corrective Action Plan allowing for 29 County owned, operated, or controlled sites to be used as Long Term Evolution (LTE) telecommunications site as part of the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) Authority's LTE System. M1410X9%7lh1►Ti14ZIa]4Bib 11M S1104_ifi Approve the LA -RIGS Authority's Corrective Action Plan (CAP) permitting construction of Long Term Evolution (LTE) infrastructure at a smaller number of County owned, operated, or controlled sites, as identified in the LA-RICS Authority's CAP; and authorize construction to begin or continue at those County owned, operated or controlled sites, as set forth in the LA-RICS Authority's CAP. PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION The purpose of the recommended action is to allow for a smaller number of County owned, operated, and controlled sites be used as LTE telecommunications site as part of the LA-RICS LTE System. If the Board approves the CAP, it is agreeing to allow construction to proceed forward at the 29 Los Angeles County owned, operated, and controlled sites. Approval of the CAP by the Board will also allow for a condition to be met as set by the federal grantor, to allow for the current grant suspension to be lifted. "To Enrich Lives Through Effective And Caring Service" Please Conserve Paper— This Document and Copies are Two -Sided Intra -County Correspondence Sent ,Electronically Only 24 The Honorable Board of Supervisors April 14, 2015 Page 2 Implementation of Strategic Plan Goals The proposed CAP supports the Countywide Strategic Plan Goal of Operational Effectiveness (Goal 1). If the CAP is approved by the Board and the grant suspension is lifted, the LA-RICS Authority will be in a position to develop a modern public safety communication system that will maximize the effectiveness of processes, structure, and operations to support the timely delivery of customer -oriented and efficient public services, particularly in the areas of public safety. FISCAL IMPACT/FINANCING Design, construction, equipment purchase and implementation of the LTE System is covered by the BTOP grant, including a 20% required match, made up of 10% in-kind match and 10% cash match paid for by the LA-RICS Authority. FACTS AND PROVISIONS/LEGAL REQUIREMENTS As your Board is aware, the National Telecommunications Information Administration (NTIA) issued a suspension notice to the LA -RIGS Authority on April 3, 2015 suspending the BTOP grant for the LA-RICS LTE project. The suspension notice required that all LTE project work stop immediately, except for specified items called out in the letter. As part of that suspension notice, the NTIA also required a CAP be submitted on April 13, 2015, that contains a revised LTE deployment plan for consideration by NTIA. That revised deployment plan must also receive approval by the Board of Supervisors prior to NTIA's release of any BTOP suspension. The revised LTE deployment plan now has, as its baseline plan, 49 sites, of which 46 are LTE sites and three (3) are microwave backhaul sites. Of the core 49 site baseline plan, 29 are Los Angeles County owned, operated, or controlled sites. No Countyfire stations have been included in the baseline plan. Of the 29 County owned, operated, or controlled sites, 20 are LA County Sheriff sites, 4 are County hospitals or rehabilitation facilities, 4 are existing ISD telecommunications sites, and the Fire Command and Control Facility (FCCF) is included as well. All 29 County owned, operated, or controlled sites are existing telecommunications transmitter sites. The remaining 20 sites of the 49 site baseline plan, are located in independent cities that have provided, or are in the process of providing, the LA-RICS Authority with site access agreements for those independent city sites. LA-RICS staff will continue to conduct public outreach meetings, as requested by the Board at the March 24, 2015 Board meeting, including conducting regional outreach meetings. The public outreach will be tailored towards the remaining sites in the baseline plan. 25 The Honorable Board of Supervisors April 14, 2015 Page 3 Given that the baseline pian includes County owned, operated, or controlled sites, the NTIA is requiring that the Board approve the CAP baseline plan, before it lifts any suspension of the BTOP grant for the LTE project. If the Board approves the CAP, it is agreeing to allow construction to proceed forward at the 29 Los Angeles County owned, operated, and controlled sites. The CAP also provides for additional options, if feasible, to allow for 15 State of California sites to be used to locate temporary cell on wheels (COWS) to improve coverage within those locations. The LA -RIGS Authority staff is currently working with State representatives on that effort. If those sites can be used to house COWS, coverage will be improved. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION The LA-RICS Authority, as the lead agency, and the County, have already determined that design, construction, implementation, operation and maintenance of the LTE System at these sites, are statutorily exempt under Public Resources Code section 21080.25, the statutory CEQA exemption adopted specifically for LA-RICS. This action is within the scope of the original determinations. IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (OR PROJECTS) There will be no compromise of public safety missions or disruption of vital, existing communication services. Respectfully submitted, Schi hamai Interim Chief Executive Officer SAH:JJ:GH TM:cc c: Executive Office, Board of Supervisors County Counsel Sheriff Fire Internal Services LA-RICS PS.LA-RICS CAP.b1.041415.docx 26 Carolynn Petru From: Kit Fox Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:38 AM To: Carolynn Petru Subject: FW: LA-RICS LMR ANTENNA TOWER PROPOSAL Hi Carolynn: Can you attach this email to the LA-RICS Staff report? Kit Sent using OWA for iPhone From: Jeff Cameron <capt.jeffcameron@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 9:14:24 AM To: Kit Fox; So Kim; Mary Kessler; Jim/Jackie Smith; Kerry Young; Cam Cameron Subject: LA-RICS LMR ANTENNA TOWER PROPOSAL Mr. Fox Thank you for your courtesy notification of City Council consideration of a formal position opposing a proposed Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) Land Mobile Radio (LMR) Antenna Tower on Coast Guard property at Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall. I am the President of La Cresta Pointe HOA and responding on behalf of the Association. We have opposed previous antenna installations and strongly oppose this proposal. Please refer to the City's files and our letters/emails (sent to sok@rpv.com). We appreciate the need for communications county -wide to facilitate the work of first responders. That said, we oppose this proposal for the same reasons we have cited over the years concerning antennas at the City Hall site. Please register our strongest opposition to this proposal when the Council deliberates on May 5. Sincerely, Jeff Cameron President La Cresta Homeowners' Association (310)561-3993 27