VRC RES 1994-002 1111
V.R.C. RESOLUTION NO. 94-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE VIEW RESTORATION
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
RECOMMENDING THE ADOPTION OF REVISED VIEW
RESTORATION PERMIT GUIDELINES TO THE CITY
COUNCIL
WHEREAS, on November 7, 1989, the People of the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes approved the "Rancho Palos Verdes Council of
Homeowners Associations and City Council Cooperative View
Preservation and Restoration Ordinance" ("Proposition M") with an
effective date of November 17, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, Section 5 of Proposition M empowers the City Council
to adopt procedures and rules or regulations which may be necessary
for its implementation; and,
WHEREAS, on June 6, 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution
No. 90-48, thereby creating the View Restoration Committee
Guidelines and Procedures; and,
WHEREAS, the View Restoration Commission has reviewed the
adopted View Restoration Committee Guidelines and Procedures, and
determined that, based on the experience of processing the first
twenty View Restoration Permits during 1990 and 1991, certain
modifications and additions to this document would enhance and
improve the implementation of Proposition M.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE VIEW RESTORATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The attached View Restoration Permit Guidelines
(Exhibit "A") , which would replace the View Restoration Committee
Guidelines and Procedures of June 6, 1990, are both necessary for
the implementation of, and consistent with, Proposition M (codified
into the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code as Section 17. 02 . 040) .
Section 2 : The View Restoration Commission hereby recommends
that the City Council adopt the revised View Restoration Permit
Guidelines, dated November 3, 1994, which are attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" .
III 4
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 3rd day of November 1994.
,pi, F. 0,i..,oe.,.
Lawrence E. Clark
Chairman
d'l
Bret erna , AICP
Director of Planning, Building and
Code Enforcement and Secretary to the
View Restoration Commission
(cpviii:vrcguide.res)
V.R.C. Resolution No. 94-02
Page 2 of 2
•
EXHIBIT "A"
VIEW RESTORATION COMMISSION
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
VIEW RESTORATION PERMIT GUIDELINES
November 3, 1994
411 III
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VIEW RESTORATION PERMIT GUIDELINES
I. Purpose Pur Page 1
'
II .
Definitions Page 2
III. Decision Criteria Page 3
pp
IV.
Application Procedure Page 7
V.
View Preservation Page 10
411
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
I. PURPOSE
Commission was created View Restoration Comm in accordance withancho Palos Verdes
'cle 17 of Paragraph A of Section 2 of the R
Art1
Association and the City of Rancho Palos
Council of Homeowners ,
CityCooperative View Preservation and Restoration
Verdes Council the Cit on November
7, 1989 . The
Ordinance, which was passed by the votersof y
Ordinance has been codified into the City's Municipal
Code as Section 17 . 020. 040, View Preservation and_Restorat ion.
isto promote the health, safety and
The purpose of the Ordinance din
f re of the residents of Rancho Palos Verdes, by
general we l_a_
• the residential property owner with foliage
balancing the rights of
and the rights of the residential property owner to restore views
from their propertywhich have been impaired by foliage.
ViewCommission accomplishes its purpose through a
The Restoration •
Permit application, site inspection,
process of View Restorationapplication. The
public hearings and a decision on with the • pp •
domain is solely foliage view impairment
Commission's judicial
through the issuance of View Restoration Permits. A decision of of
the
the Commission on a View Restoration Permit is appealable to
• consideringthe written and oral testimony at
City Council.1. After
the appeal hearing, the City Council may take
one of the following
actions:
of the View Restoration
Affirm the decision Commission and
dismiss the appeal if, in the opinion of the City Council, the
appeal does not present a substantial issue regarding the
• n or application of the provision of the View
interpretation pp
Restoration and Preservation Ordinance and the findings of the
View Restoration
Commission do not warrant further hearing; or
back to the View Restoration Commission to
2 . Refer the matter
conduct further proceedings, if, in the opinion of the
Council
• , the Commission has not properly interpreted or applied the provisions of the Ordinance or has made some other
connection with the case or
error in if significant newresented in conjunction with the appeal.
The
evidence is P
Citystate theground(s) for the remand and
Council shall shall give instructions to the View Restoration Commission
concerning any
error found by the City Council in the
Commission's prior determination.
View involvingtrees located on City-owned
restoration requests alongpublic
such aspublic parks, parkways and medians
property, the issuance of ah
streets, are administered by City Staff through
Street Tree Permi Section
Permit. For more information, please refer to
17 .76 of the Municipal Code.
Page 1
111 411
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
II. DEFINITIONS
A. View
Section 17 .96. 1950 of the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code
defines "view" as follows:
On the
Palos Verdes Peninsula, it is quite common to have a
near view and a far view because of the nature of many of the
hills on the peninsula.
A "near view" is defined as a scene located on the peninsula
including, but not limited to, a valley, ravine, equestrian
trail, pastoral environment or any natural setting.
A "far view" is defined as a scene located off the peninsula
including, but not limited to, the ocean, Los Angeles basin,
• at night, harbor, Vincent
distant mountains, city lights g ,
Thomas Bridge, shoreline or off-shore islands.
"View" shall not include vacant land that is developable under
the city code, nor the sky, either above distant mountains or
above the height of off-shore islands.
View may extend in any horizontal direction (three hundred and
sixty degrees rees of horizonal arc) and shall be considered as a
single view even if broken into segments by foliage,
g
structures or other interference.
B. Viewing Area
Section 17 .96. 1980 of the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code
defines "viewing area" as, follows:
Viewing area shall be that area of the structure (excluding
hallwaY •ys garages or closets) or lot (excluding the setback
area) where the owner and City determine the best and most
important view exists. However, for the purposeof
consideringView Restoration Applications, multiple viewing areas may exist. The finished floor elevation of any viewing
area must be at or above the existing grade adjacent to the
exterior wall of the part of the building nearest to said
viewing area. The determination shall be made by balancing
the nature of the view to be protected and the importance of
the area of the structure from where the view is taken. Once
all determined for a particular application, the viewing
finally application.may not be changed for any subsequent In the
event the city and owner cannot agree on the viewing are, the
decision of the city shall control. A property owner may
Page 2
411
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
appeal the determination of viewing area. In such event, the
pp• area will be made bythe body making
decision on the viewing r
the final decision on the application. The property owner may
preserve his or her right to dispute the decision on viewing
area for a subsequent application without disputing the
decision onP indicating ending application byating the viewing area filing a statement to that
effect the property owner believes
to be more appropriate. The statement shall be filed with the
city prior to consideration of the pending application by the
city.
1. The "viewingarea" includes any level surface within, the house
(excludingclosets, hallways or garages) or within the
p areas) . Viewingarea may
building pad (excluding the setback
include multiple rooms or locations on the property. It is
the policy of the City that, in general, exclusions from
viewing areas should be minimized.
2 .
The "best and most important view" must be taken with a total
view of up to 360 degrees inside and/or outside the structure.
The best and most important viewing area shall be determined
on a case-by-case basis.
3 . Views can be taken from a seated position at a height of three
(3)
feet, six (6) inches up to a full standing position.
4 . Views may be taken from second (or higher) stories of a
structure.
III. DECISION CRITERIA
Section 17 . 02 . 040 (8) (2) (c) of the Municipal Code requires that, in
C8) C2)
order for
a View Restoration notice to be issued, the View
Restoration Commission must make the following six mandatory
findings:
1. The applicant has complied with the early neighbor
consultationprocess rocess and has shown proof of cooperation on his
/her part to resolve conflicts.
a. Evidence of adequate early neighbor consultation shall
consist of a form signed by the foliage owner and the
applicant acknowledging consultation (see attached form) ;
or
Page 3
411 411
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
b. In the
event that the foliage owner is not cooperative,
adequate neighbor earlynei hbor consultation shall consist of
sending a registered istered letter with return receipt to the
foliage owner and submittal of a copy of the letter with
the postal registration as proof of attempted
consultation.
located on City-owned property and the
C. If the foliage is Y
applicant is dissatisfied with the previous action of the
Cityon a Street Tree Permit application (see Section
17 .76 of the Municipal Code) , a copy of the City's
decision will be considered adequate evidence of early
neighbor bor consultation and a View Restoration Permit may
�- �ion Commission for
be submitted to the View Restoration
consideration.
d. At thepublic ublic hearing, the applicant must address his/her
specific efforts to comply with the ordinance requirement
p
for attempting to resolve conflict.
exceeding sixteen (16) feet or the ridge line of the
2 . Foliage x g
primary structure, whichever is lower, significantly
impairs
viewingarea, whether such foliage
a view from the applicant's
is located totally on one property, or when combined with
foliage located on more than one property.
In order to determine which of the two measurements referenced in
the paragraph above is the lowest, the sixteen (16) foot height
measurement
shall be measured pursuant to Development Code Section
17 . 02 . 040 (8) (1) (d)
a.
For lots which slope uphill from the street of access,
the height ht shall be measured from the existing grade at
the
highest point on the lot covered by the structure.
g
b. For lots sloping downhill from the street of access, the
_ ,.
height
shall be measured from the average elevation of
thep roperty line abutting the street of access.
sloping in the same direction as the street • of
c. For lots P • g different elevation
access, lots with a building pad at a
than
the street, or a lot configuration not previously
discussed, the height shall be measured from existing
grade at the highest elevation covered by the structure.
• the City's s Development Code limits the height
Section 17 .42 . 020 of Y "hedge" the Code as
to six (6) feet. A is defined by
of hedges
"shrubbery or trees planted and maintained in such a manner as to
create a physical barrier. "
A hedge can be included in a View
Page 4
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
Restoration Permitapplication a lication if the top of the hedge exceeds
sixteen feet in height or the ridge line of the primary structure,
whichever measurement is lower. The View Restoration Commission
may require e a hedge to be trimmed to less than six (6) feet in
height, if necessary, to restore the view.
topof the hedge is below sixteen feet or the ridge
However, if the . ; measurement is lower,
line of the primary structure, whichever •
these cases shall be referred to the City's Code Enforcement
Division for resolution. In Code Enforcement cases, the City
g
cannot require
a hedge to be trimmed below six (6) feet in height,
unless it i s' necessarydue to required lot setback requirements or
safety reasons.
The View Restoration Commission may, at its discretion, require the
anycase by a qualified soils engineer, landscape
review of
architect, arborist or other appropriate professional. The Staff
shall be responsible for obtaining qualified consultants to review
and comment on the specific cases requested by the Commission. In
p
cases where expert advice is sought, the applicant(s) shall be
responsible
for bearingthe costs associated with this effort. The
Commission, again at its discretion, may abide by, or reject, the
advice of the consultant(s) .
removed is located on
3 . The foliage to be property, any part of
which is less than one thousand (1, 000) feet from the
applicant's property line.
a. Staff from the Department of Planning, Building and Code
Enforcement will determine the distance from the
applicant's
pp1icant's property line to the nearest property line ofthe site containing the foliage under consideration.
4 . The foliage significantly impairing the view did not exist as
view impairing vegetation when the lot from which the view is
taken was created.
Where the applicant's property and the property
a' pp
containing the foliage in question, are both located in
the same subdivision or in adjacent subdivisions, Staff
will determine the date at which the lots were created.
b. In
other cases, the following sources of information may
be
used to determine the time when the foliage under
consideration began to impair the view:
Page 5
!II 411
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
i. Aerial photographs maintained by the City.
photographs Other taken on known dates indicating
theP resence of vegetation or lack of vegetation.
iii. Property descriptions prepared in connection with
P Y
the sale of property (i.e. multiple listing
information, newspaper advertisements, real estate
flyers, etc. ) .
iv. Testimony of witnesses.
v. Any reports documenting land conditions or site
p
surveys that include information with about
vegetation.
5. Removal or trimming of the foliage will not cause an
unreasonable infringement of the privacy of the occupants of
theP roperty upon which the foliage is located.
a. privacy rivacy can be achieved in many unobtrusive ways
such that obstructive foliage should generally not be
preserved to protect indoor privacy.
b.
The burden of proof of "unreasonable" infringement of indoor and/or outdoor privacy should be on the foliage
owner. The Commission will make a determination on a
case by case basis.
6 . For property located within the boundaries of the Miraleste
p Y
Recreation and Parks District, the Committee shall also find
that
removal or trimming of foliage strikes a reasonable
balance ce between meeting the purposes of Section 17.02 . 040 set
forth in Section 1 of the Ordinance approved by the voters on
7, 1989, and preserving the historical development of
November
the Miraleste Recreation and Parks District with large numbers
of trees.
a. The Miraleste Recreation and Parks District has adopted
a procedure for responding to view restoration and
maintenance requests for foliage located on its property.
Suchro erties owned by the District are not subject to
p p
the City s View Restoration Permit process.
b. Properties located within the boundaries of the District,
but owned by an entity other than the District, are
subject to the View Restoration Permit process and the
additional finding above.
Page 6
411
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
c. A map of the boundaries of the Miraleste Recreation and
Parks District and a list of the street within the
Miralest Homeowners Association are attached.
IV. APPLICATION PROCEDURE
Once
a View Restoration Permit application has been submitted,
pursuant to State law, the City has thirty (3 0) days in which to
the application ion to determine if the information is complete,
review , pp• .
before beginning processing the request. If any information is
g
missing or
• sin components of the application are incomplete, the
.
applicant i cant wi ll be notified of any deficiencies in writing and the
will l be held in abeyance until the necessary materials
application
received bythe City. Once an application has been deemed
are • ,
complete to begin processing, the City has ninety (90) days in
•p g request, i.e. adoption of a
which to take an action on the P
Resolution by the View Restoration Commission.
Once
the application is deemed complete, the following sequenceof
p
ste s shall occur in order to process an application for a View
Restoration Permit (also see attached flow chart) :
completes and submits a View Restoration
1. The applicant(s) ,
Permit application form (see attached form) to the City' s
_ er L pp � Buildingand Code Enforcement,
Department of Planning, .
accompanied by the appropriate filing fees, in order to
P
initiate a request for view restoration.
It should ould be noted that the fees required for a View
Restoration Permit are established by the City Council by
resolution. Due to the wide variation in View Restoration
Permit applications, the fee is a combination flat fee and
deposit. The flat fee is a fixed amount that •is paid by
trustP• City's costs associated with
all applicants to cover the routineprocessing rocessing steps, such as reviewing the application
for completeness, conducting the initial site visit and
scheduling public the hearing. The trust deposit covers the
variable City'able costs from that point forward, so that the
applicant is charged only for the time the Staff or an expert
consultant (if any) spends on the project. Examples of
Staff's hourly costs would include conducting any subsequent
site
visits, attending the public hearing(s) and preparing the
. Staff Report(s) and Resolution (written decision of the
Commission) .
2 . Staff notifies the foliage owner(s) , in writing, that the
request for view restoration has been filed with the City,
attaching a copy of the application.
Page 7
411
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
3 . Staff schedules les and conducts the Staff's site visit(s) tothe
applicant's and foliage owner's properties. During the first
site visit tg
o the foliage owner's property, Staff will inquire
Commission
as to whether the foliage owner wishes to haVe the
members
visit their property. Requests for visitation to
foliage owners property by the Commission will be honored.
4 . Staff prepares a Staff Report to the View Restoration
Commission, to include the following:
a. Application form;
b. Early Neighbor Consultation documentation;
addressingthe criteria outlined in Section
1c. Analysis
7 , 02 , 040 B 2) (c) of the City's Municipal p Code (View
Preservation and Restoration Ordinance) ,
d. Recommendation(s) on the disposition of the application;
e. Determination if any of the Commission members (regular
and
alternates) are ineligible to participate on the
application, based on the proximity of their property to
the subject properties; and,
f . A tentative
site visitation schedule for eligible
• Commission members (regular and alternate) .
L f establishes a date (in consultation with the Chairman of
5. S oaf� establi e Commission for the public hearing on the application and
th ) � the applicant(s)p
rovides written notice of the hearing to and
the foliageowner(s) a minimum of 3 0 days prior to the hearing
date.
members of the View Restoration 6. The eligible Commission visit
the site(s) during the 30 day notice period.
to participate in the decision on a View
a. Eligibility p , p �. , dependant endant on the
Restoration Permit application is a p
'
eligible Commissioner visiting the site(s) prior to the
public hearing.
are responsible for arranging visits to the
b. Commissioners
site(s) . However, no more than three (3) Commissioners
(regular and/or alternate members) may- visit the site at
the same time.
Page 8
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
c. Commissioners are required to visit the applicant's
property and will visit the foliage owner's property if
p y
requested to do so by the foliage owner(s) .
d. If an applicant refuses access to his or her site, the
request for a View Restoration Permit will be denied.
7 . The View Restoration Commission conducts a public hearing
pursuant to the Commission's adopted Administrative Procedures
(VRC Resolution No. 94-1) . The Chairperson's instructions to
the audience will generally follow these guidelines:
a. Any person desiring to speak must first be recognized by
the Chairperson.
b. AllP articipants must speak from the podium.
p
c. All speakers must first state their full names and
addresses, and the names of any persons in whose behalf
they are appearing (if any) .
d. All comments must be made clearly and audibly.
e.
Repetition of comments should be avoided and speakers
will be discouraged from reading a submission which has
p
been copied and distributed to the Commission or is
contained in the agenda packet.
f. Normally, applicant(s)the a plicant(s) and foliage owner (s) will be
limited to a five (5) minute presentation and a three (3)
minute rebuttal (if requested) . All other persons will
be
generallylimited to a three (3) minute presentation
each.
g• Except when necessary for immediate clarification of a
particular point, no person shall be allowed to speak a
second time until all others wishing to speak have had an
opportunity
to do so, and then only at the direction of
the Chairperson.
h. Due
to unusual complexity, submission of expert testimony
a large number of speakers on a particular case, the
or g discretion, may at his or her allocate more
C )
than five 5 minutes per side and allow those wishing to
speak on each side to designate a spokesperson or to
p time among the allotted themselves.
Page 9
•
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
public hearing is closed
8. After the and the Commission has
reached a decision on the application, a resolution reflecting
the
Commission's decision is drafted by Staff and, where
appropriate, is reviewed by the City Attorney.
*Commission.s Consent Calendar for final meeting, the resolution is placed on the
9 ' At asubsequent action, resulting in the issuance of a View Restoration Notice or denial of the
request.
V. VIEW PRESERVATION
With regard to foliage obstructing a view after the issuance of a
View Restoration tion Permit or upon the effective date of the Ordinance
(November 17 , 1989 Section 17 . 02 .040 (A) (3) of the Municipal Code
) ,
states:
Foliage
Obstruction. No person shall significantly impair a
view from a viewing area of a lot:
permittingfoliage to grow to a height exceeding the
a. By• Commission
height determined by the View Restoration through the issuance of a View Restoration Permit under
g
subsection C.2 of this Section; or
b.
If no View Restoration Permit has been issued, the lesser
of (a) ridge rid a line of the primary structure on the
property, or (b) sixteen (16) feet.
If foliage on the property ro erty already exceeds subsections (a) and(b) referenced above on the effective date of this Section as
approved by
the voters on November 7, 1989; and significantly
impairs
a view from a viewing area of a lot, then
notwithstanding
whether any person has sought or obtained
of
issuancea View Restoration Permit, the owner shall not let
the foliage
exceed the height existing on said effective date.
of this paragraph is to ensure that the owners of
The purpose• o f this paragraph on the
foliage which violates the provisions p g
effective
date of this section shall not allow the foliage to
increase height;hei ht; this paragraph does no "grandfather" or
otherwisepermit ermit such foliage to continue to block a view.
1.
After Issuance of a View Restoration Permit
Restoration Permit, Staff
the issuance of a View
a. After h
shall document the restored view through the use of black
photography and
white hoto raphy or other method approved by the
Commission. Thephotographic documentation shall be made
part of the City's permanent record
Commis sand shall be kept on
Page 10
View Restoration Permit Guidelines
November 3, 1994
file at the Planning, Building and Code Enforcement
Department for use, if necessary, as a bench mark in
future view preservation enforcement actions.
b.
Upon a complaint, examination of the photograph(s) or
other evidence will indicate whether the foliage has been
maintained in a manner that is consistent with the Notice
of a View Restoration Permit.
2 . In Absence of a View Restoration Permit
a. The owner of foliage is responsible for protectingany
right ht he or she has to exceed the foliage height
limitations that went into effect on November 7, 1989 .
owner wishing to protect their existing view
b. The property L ,
responsible for submitting documentation of their
isP
view,ew as it existed on or after the effective date of the
Ordinance, to the City for verification and incorporation
�
into the City's permanent records (see attached form) .
These records shall be kept on file at the Planning,
Buildingand Code Enforcement Department for use, if
Y
necessar , as a bench mark in future view preservation
enforcement actions.
Attachments
Acknowledgement of View Restoration Request Form
View Restoration Permit Application Form
Map of Miraleste Recreation and Park District Boundaries
List of Streets within the Miraleste Homeowners Association
View Restoration Permit Process Flow Chart
Documentation of Existing Views Form
(cpvrcadmin:vrcguid.113)
Page 11
411111
- RANCHO PALOS VERDES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF VIEW RESTORATION REQUEST
, am the owner of property
I ,
located at , and wish to apply to the City
in the City of Rancho Palos V erdes ,
for restoration of my view of
which is presently impaired by
(type of foliage) at
Applicant
Signature
Date
The undersigned owner of the property at that address has been
proposed ro osed view restoration request . Such
contacted regarding P a
i nature below acknowledges contact with the applicant but does
s 9
not indicate support for the request.
Foliage Owner
Signature
Address
Phone No.
Date
•
30940 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD / RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90274-5391 / (213) 377-0360
1111
L41111
RANCHO PALOS VERDES
VIEW RESTORATION APPLICATION
NUMBER
APPLICANT:
(Name)
(Address)
Telephone: Home Work
List the addresses of the properties on which the foliage is
located and specify the type and number of trees and shrubs on
eachproperty erty that are impairing the view ( attach additional pages
p
if necessary) :
MANDATORY FINDINGS
1 . Explain what steps you have taken to comply with the early
neighbor hbor consultation process and attach any written proof
demonstrating your efforts to resolve the conflict and seek
cooperation from your neighbors.
30940 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD I RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90274.5391 / (213) 377-0360
2 . Describe the ing area on your propert om which the
best and most portant view is taken . D ibe the view
that is being obstructed. Does the foliage in question
exceed 16 feet in height or the ridge line of the residence
on the property on which it is located?
3 .
Is the foliage to be removed located on a property, any part
of which is less than one thousand feet from your property?
4. Did the foliage which is impairing the view exist prior to
the creation of the lot from which the view is taken?
5 . Will the removal of the foliage cause an unreasonable
infringement on the privacy of the occupants of the property
•
on which the foliage is located?
6 . Is the property on which the foliage is located, within the
boundaries of the Miraleste Recreation and Parks District?
• If so, is the foliage located on parkland owned by the
Miraleste Recreation and Parks District?
I HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury, that the information
and
materials submitted with this application are true and
correct.
Signature of Applicant
Date:
Staff S -Nature_--
Date:
I- 0
'
cn Z
a LI o
a
z x
M—
s o
V r
w8
1-- z o Q
cr
oE-
w i= a.) 8(/)115
Q
Q 0 Y
< w Lr
CC ccX0cr
. (cf. 6
2 0, < ......
w .u.;?-vi
, cr °- .. •
r I A ' •--.. •41....,-0-....
• o
II
tasi:=4
Ir/ 4..
:„ . :it.
*N6
- et ''°it.IL1-72,, '. 1. 1171±.,
kj""n.."
. 4sh, "jlit.
l
R • E[EftLJtT:t
4i. u-lL'r■ __ mi.00,1:
i • t • • �' _'fes►_ VIS - SI
ITO
.1 5
.1- CM li 411.1‘114 ) ' , a:. „,. ......--) -,....t., ,--------- 7' .-t-e. . . -
-ra tp,•1:P1-1 IS: :3Tri 114 ...................../(7C--'4,- - • 4
. 7 Al Zlii42 - • e - _
.110in . - 1,,,
.,1,w,...i...,
- --. . .1,_. Iv . ...,c., . 4:„...„ ,,, ; .
...,
i• '
A•j 04#010/ 1 lito,
j `• \ ,- ipv•• 01 •i• it . • 4
t'i !
4111111
. .
. . • . .
„..,.:_ . .,
, :
. 3
..
7-loirl.ois. , I, .
v . „is>. .piv
/ ,. . '4 -- t . . • ., • I 0 • . i 40 A 1
• II 1 irdkiii 6:41007 i 'Ill 1 - .Fed' "'V:1 - - -
..„t__. A:1,.tsitiv,• 7. . i , it,..
w law % , !.
- ,' 141.404 ipA,,.._' 4' C. ., : ..' 1).., , \ ,txr.1-74.-(9'' . :... , *4.4_ ,?. th Z:131.. . 1- , t I ' .
);.(%:Aleir . . if7- ii......r : - .1.
1061/4,\ . Ai,,?..if' le ' 'I'
:4'--4 .
A 1.3 .,ik , .. • i 3 ii,„„
,,,,.4 A
5.„
,-1;i0,1f-, . i .
I 66 .f : gei.. . , iia . ..• , dor . . . -, „
..................
I. 1 , ` —1 -,i _I--,/egq-4-4- _,.. , . 4 --I .
a i.1 7'i1! u % .._,411 ./ .44r . C • 4 1.. 4.0 =p
/4 -T a‘ ,4,
,40k74 _ ___Ip. .,,,A - --1 • 4 r
111/ 111/
STREETS WITHIN THE MIRALESTE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Beauvais Road
Corsini Place
El Tesoro Place
Lorraine Road
Maine Road
Miraleste Drive (between PVDE and Via Colinita)
Miraleste Plaza
Nancy Road
Palos Verdes
Drive East (between Picarde & Via Subi da)
Picarde Road
Via Bramante
Via Canada
Via Ciega
Via Colinita
Via De Anzar
Via Del Playa
Via Frascati
Via La Poloma
Via Lorenzo
Via Siena
Via Velardo
Via Vico
VIEW &ORATION PERMIT PROCESS 410
COMPLETE APPLICATION
SUBMITTED
•
}
NOTICE SENT TO
: FOLIAGE OWNER & APPLICANT ;
: STAFF SCHEDULES & CONDUCTS
STAFF SITE VISIT
STAFF REPORT
PREPARED
.4c7
f
HEARING DATE SET &
30 DAY NOTICE MAILES}
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
• VISIT SITE
N1q17
PUBLIC HEARING/DECISION
t
RESOLUTION DRAFTED
BY STAFF AND, WHEN
APPROPRIATE , REVIEWED
BY CITY ATTORNEY
4111,
RESOLUTION RETURNED ON
CONSENT CALENDAR
vC7
NOTICE OF PERMIT ISSUED
OR- APPLICATION DENIED
•
L111
RANCHO PALOSVERDES
DOCUMENTATION OF EXISTING FOLIAGE
1 . NAME OF VIEWER:
2 . ADDRESS OF VIEWER:
3 . ADDRESS OF PROPERTY WITH FOLIAGE:
4 . LOCATION FROM WHICH PHOTO( S) WAS TAKEN (e.g . , dining room,
rear yard deck, etc . ) :
5 . DESCRIPTION OF VEGETATION (approximate ) :
6 . HEIGHT OF VEGETATION (approximate) :
7 . DESCRIPTION OF VIEW:
8. TYPE OF CAMERA/LENS:
9 . DATE OF PHOTO( S ) :
10 . DATE SUBMITTED:
11. VERIFIED BY STAFF - NAME/DATE:
12 . SIGNATURE:
30940 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD / RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90274-5391 / (213) 377-0360