PC RES 2002-016P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING, WITH CONDITIONS,
HEIGHT VARIATION (CASE NO. ZON2002-00082) TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF FIRST AND SECOND -STORY ADDITIONS
WITH A TOTAL AREA OF 822 SQUARE FEET TO AN EXISTING
3,970 SQUARE -FOOT TWO-STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
AT A PROPOSED HEIGHT OF 26'-0", AS MEASURED FROM THE
LOWEST FINISHED GRADE COVERED BY STRUCTURE TO THE
HIGHEST ROOF RIDGELINE, ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2554
COLT ROAD.
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2002 an application for Height Variation (Case
No ZON2002-00082) was submitted to the Planning Department to allow the
construction of 1,048 square feet of first and second -story additions to an existing
3,970 square -foot two-story, single-family residence at a height of 26'-0" as
measured from the lowest finished grade covered by structure; and
WHEREAS, during the analysis of the project, the proposal was revised,
which resulted in decreasing the additions to 822 square feet; and
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2002 the subject application were deemed complete
for processing by Staff, and,
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2002 the required public notices were mailed to
property owners within a 500' foot radius of the subject property informing them of
the proposed project and the scheduled public hearing on July 23, 2002.
Furthermore, a notice was published in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News on June
22, 2002; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provision of the California Quality Act, Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et.seq ("CEQA"), the State's CEQA Guidelines,
California Code of Regulation, Title 14, Section 15000 et.seq , the City's Local CEQA
Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65962 5(F) (Hazardous Waste and
Substances Statement), Staff found no evidence that Height Variation (Case No
ZON2002-00082) would have a significant effect on the environment, and, therefore,
the proposed project has been found to be categorically exempt (Class 3); and,
WHEREAS, after notices issued pursuant to the requirements of Rancho
Palos Verdes Development Code, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
public hearing on July 23, 2002, at which all interested parties were given the
opportunity to be heard and present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS-
P.C.
OLLOWS-
• Resolution Ns2002-16
Page of 4
Section 1: The applicants successfully completed the Early Neighborhood
Consultation process by obtaining a minimum of 25% of property owner signatures
from properties within the 500' radius (37 of 75 or 49%) and 70% from properties
within the 100' radius (14 of 15 or 93%)
Section 2: The subject lot is not located in an area designated by the
City's General Plan and the City's Coastal Specific Plan as a viewing area and
therefore the proposed structure does not impair any public views
Section 3: The subject lot is located on a manufactured slope that was
created at the time the building pads for the subject tract were graded and is not
located on a ridge or promontory, as defined by the City's development Code
Section 4: The project has been designed to minimize the impairment of
"protected views" from surrounding properties As proposed, the applicants' request
to add a second story and enclose a portion of a balcony does not impair any views.
A silhouette of the second -story addition constructed per City requirements revealed
no view obstructions. Adjacent property owners were notified and have indicated no
objection after viewing the silhouette for more than 30 days.
Section 5: The home is situated up-slope from its adjacent neighbors and
down-slope from the street. There are no views from surrounding properties over
the subject home. As such, the granting of this application will cause no significant
cumulative view impairment.
Section 6: The proposed project will not create view impairments from
surrounding properties. The property directly north of the site is located at a slightly
higher elevation and has views along its side and rear yard which face away from
the subject site Further northwest, properties are at a much higher elevation and
have canyon views towards the north rather than views of the harbor to the east.
Properties to the northwest that do have harbor views are located at an elevation
that is beyond the potential view obstruction of the proposed second -story additions
The properties to the south are located down-slope from the site and have views
facing away from the site The properties directly to the east are located at a slightly
lower elevation than the subject property and have no views in its direction. All of
their views face away from the subject site and towards the harbor area The
property directly adjacent to the west is located down-slope from the site and has no
view over the site The second -story addition, therefore, does not affect its views.
Properties further west are much higher in elevation and have views that extend over
and beyond the subject site and proposed additions. As such, the proposed project
will not significantly impair views from the defined "viewing areas" of properties
located north, south, east or west of the subject site.
Section 7: Staff has reviewed the proposed site plan, floor plan, and
elevations and determined that the project complies with the residential development
criteria for an RS -2 zoning district, as it pertains to setbacks, lot coverage, and all
other development standards, with the exception of height for which a Height
Variance is being sought The proposed additions will be constructed in compliance
P C. Resolution No 2002-16
Page 2 of 4
with the City's General Plan, Development Code, Uniform Building Code, and all
applicable State and Federal laws. In addition to obtaining planning approvals, the
applicant is required to obtain approvals from the City's Building and Safety Division
prior to issuance of building permits
Section 8: The proposed additions are compatible with the character of
the immediate neighborhood for the following reasons. Because of the down-sloping
characteristics of the lot and hidden configuration of the homes within this
neighborhood, the proposed addition will not make the scale of the home
incompatible with other homes as viewed from the street and surrounding properties
The additions encompass the footprint of the existing garage and an existing
balcony The footprint of the home will only expand by 221 SF, resulting in a lot
coverage increase of approximately 1%, from 38% to 39% The maximum lot
coverage allowance in the RS -2 zoning district is 40%. Second, the subject property
is located within a residential tract that was developed in the late 1950's and early
1960's The predominant styles found are Mediterranean and California
Contemporary. The subject residence was built with a Mediterranean design, which
incorporates a low -pitch Spanish the roof and a stucco exterior. The applicants are
proposing to maintain the design by constructing the additions to match the existing
home. In addition, a condition has been placed on the approval that requires revised
plans, which provide second -story step -backs from the first story and lower the
ridgeline of the master bathroom by eliminating the first -story laundry room. Last,
the existing structure currently complies with the required 20' front yard setback
The majority of the homes in the area are developed with a minimum twenty (20) -
foot front yard setback, as required by the Development Code. Therefore, as
proposed, the additions will result in a home that is compatible with neighborhood
Section 9: Based on the layout of the proposed addition, in relation to the
surrounding neighborhood, the project will not result in an unreasonable infringement
of privacy. The windows of the second -story addition along the front elevation face
the street and front yard where there are no neighbors to infringe on. Along the rear
elevation, the proposed windows face the side yard and a single-family home
However, the adjacent home is more than 40 feet away from the side property line
due to an existing driveway that serves as an easement to several homes west and
south of the site. In addition, the neighboring home has its front yard facing the
proposed addition.
Section 10: A Notice of Decision shall be given to the applicant and to all
interested parties informing them of the Planning Commission's decision.
Section 11: Any interested party may appeal this decision or any portion of
this decision to the City Council. Pursuant to Section 17 02 040 C 1 j of the Rancho
Palos Verdes Municipal Code, any such appeal must be filed with the City, in writing,
and with the appropriate appeal fee, no later than fifteen (15) days following the date
of the Planning Commission's adoption of this resolution.
Section 12: For the foregoing reasons, and based on the information and
findings included in the Staff Report, Minutes, and other records of proceedings, the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby approves Height
P C Resolution No. 2002-16
Page 3 • 4
Variation (Case No. ZON2002-00082), thereby approving the construction of 822
square feet of first and second -story additions to an existing 3,970 square -foot two-
story, single-family residence at a height of 26'-0" as measured from the lowest
finished grade covered by structure, subject to the conditions of approval in Exhibit
4W.
PASSED, APPROVED, A
following vote:
AYES:Commissioners Cote, Lyon, Mueller, Tomblin, Chairman Cartwright
ABSTENTIONS: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Duran Reed and Vice
las, AICP
,of Planning B Iding
Je Enforcer and,
ry to the Planning Commission
J,0h S Cartwright
Ghairman
P.C. Resolution No. 2002-_1_6
Page 4 of 4