PC RES 2001-033A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING, WITH
CONDITIONS, HEIGHT VARIATION NO. 936 TO ALLOW THE
ENCLOSURE OF AN EXISTING 162 SQUARE FOOT SECOND
STORY BALCONY AND CONVERTING THE ADDITION INTO
HABITABLE SPACE, THUS CONSTRUCTION A 162 SQUARE
FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE. THE
PROPOSED ADDITION WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT A
PROPOSED HEIGHT OF 19'-0", AS MEASURED FROM THE
HIGHEST FINISHED GRADE COVERED BY STRUCTURE.
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2001 an application for Height Variation No. 936
was submitted to the Planning Department to allow the enclosure of an existing
162 square foot second story balcony, and converting it into habitable space,
thus resulting in an 162 square foot addition to an existing 4,318 square foot,
two-story, single-family residence at a height of 19'-0", as measured from the
highest grade covered by structure to the top of the addition; and,
WHEREAS, on August 20, 2001 the subject applications were deemed
complete for processing by Staff, and,
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2001 a public notice was mailed to property
owners within a 500 foot radius of the subject property informing them of the
proposed project. Furthermore, a notice was published in the Palos Verdes
Peninsula News on August 25, 2001, and,
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2001 a revised public notice was mailed to
property owners within 500 foot radius of the subject property Informing them of
the scheduled Planning Commission public hearing on October 9, 2001. The
previous notice did not identify a public hearing before the Planning Commission
Furthermore, a revised notice was also published in the Palos Verdes Peninsula
News on September 22, 2001; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provision of the California Quality Act, Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et.seq. ("CEQA"), the State's CEQA Guidelines,
California Code of Regulation, Title 14, Section 15000 et.seq., the City's Local
CEQA Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65962.5(F) (Hazardous Waste
and Substances Statement), Staff found no evidence that Height Variation No.
936 would have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore the
proposed project has been found to be categorically exempt (Class 1, Section
15303(a)), and,
P.C. Resolution No. 2001-33
Page 1 of 4
WHEREAS, after notices issued pursuant to the requirements of Rancho
Palos Verdes Development Code, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
public hearing on October 9, 2001, at which all interested parties were given the
opportunity to be heard and present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS
Section 1: The Planning Commission finds that the applicant
successfully completed the Early Neighborhood Consultation process by
obtaining 25 of the 97 properties within the 500' radius, which is 26%, and 9 of
the 11 properties within the 100' radius, which is 82%.
Section 2: The subject lot is not located in an area designated by the
City's General Plan and the City's Coastal Specific Plan as a viewing area and
therefore the proposed structure does not impair any public views
Section 3: The subject lot is located on a manufactured slope that was
created at the time the building pads for the subject tract were graded and is not
located on a ridge or promontory, as defined by the City's development Code.
Section 4: Based on an analysis of the existing neighborhood, the
surrounding residences do not have any views through the proposed addition.
The residence located to the north (6762 Birchman Drive) does not have any
windows oriented through the addition, therefore the proposed addition will not
impact the views of 6762 Birchman Drive. The residence located to the east
(6754 Birchman Drive) has views toward the west and south, however the
proposed addition will be located entirely in front of the existing residence,
therefore any views that 6754 Birchman Drive might have through the subject
property is already impaired by the existing residence. Therefore the proposed
addition will not significantly impair a view from the viewing area of another
parcel
Section 5:, The proposed project will not create a view impairment from
surrounding properties in that the surrounding properties are located at a similar
elevation to that of the subject property
Section 6:. The proposed structure has been designed to minimize the
impairment of views from surrounding properties by situating the addition at the
location of an existing covered balcony, under the existing roof eave and
therefore, not changing the height of the existing structure or the general footprint
of the existing second story.
Section 7:, The proposed structure complies with the residential
development standards for a RS -4 zoning district in terms of open space, height
requirements, and setbacks. Furthermore, in addition to obtaining Planning
P.C. Resolution No. 2001-33
Page 2 of 4
approval, building and grading permits must also be obtained for compliance with
the Uniform Building Code, the Development Code and the City's Municipal
Code.
Section 8: The proposed addition, at 162 square feet, is compatible
with the character of the immediate neighborhood in that the design of the
proposed addition will not increase the apparent bulk and mass of the existing
structure because the proposed addition is located under the existing eave and
where there is currently a balcony Additionally, the design of the proposed
addition will be compatible with the design of the surrounding second story
homes in that many of the surrounding second stories are either flush with the
first story or cantilevering over the first story, the way the proposed addition is
designed. Furthermore, the proposed finish material, stucco, is a commonly
found finish material in the surrounding neighborhood
Section 9: According to the layout of the proposed addition in relation to
the surrounding neighboring, the proposed project will not result in an
unreasonable infringement of privacy since although the proposed project will be
oriented toward 6754 Birchman Drive, it will not be directly oriented toward any
windows or the rear yard, it will be directed toward the front yard. Additionally,
during the public noticing period, none of the adjacent property owners
expressed concern that the project will create an infringement of privacy.
Section 10: A Notice of Decision shall be given to the applicant and to all
interested parties informing them of the Planning Commission's decision.
Section 11: Any interested party may appeal this decision or any portion
of this decision to the City Council. Pursuant to Section 17.02.040.C.1 j of the
Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, any such appeal must be filed with the
City, in writing, and with the appropriate appeal fee, no later than fifteen (15)
days following the date of the Planning Commission's adoption of this resolution.
Section 12: For the foregoing reasons, and based on the information and
findings included in the Staff Report, Minutes, and other records of proceedings,
the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby approves
Height Variation No. 936, thereby approving the enclosure of an existing 162
square foot second story balcony, and converting it into habitable space, thus
resulting in an 162 square foot addition to an existing 4,318 square foot, two-
story, single-family residence at a height of 19'-0", as measured from the highest
grade covered by structure to the top of the addition subject to the conditions of
approval in Exhibit "A".
P.C. Resolution No. 2001-33
Page 3 of 4
0
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 9th day of October, 2001, by the
following vote:
AYES: Cartwright, Clark, Long, Lyon, Mueller, Paulson, Vannorsdall
NOES: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
ABSENT: None
J(bel Nojas, AICP
re or of Planni Jnt;
uwlding
and Code Enforc and,
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Frank Lyon
Chairman
j
P.C. Resolution No. 2001- 33
Page 4 of 4
9 9
Exhibit "A"
Conditions of Approval
Height Variation No. 936
The applicant/property owner shall submit to the City a statement, in writing that
they have read, understand and agree to all conditions of approval listed below
Failure to provide said written statement within ninety (90) days of the effective
date of approval shall render this approval null and void
2 Approval of Height Variation No 936 is for the enclosure of an existing 162
square foot second story balcony and converting it into habitable space, thus
resulting in a 162 square foot addition to the second story of the existing
residence
3 The addition shall maintain the following minimum setbacks
15'-0" rear yard (proposed 20'-0")
5'-0" interior side yard (proposed 19'-0" from the north property line, 9'-0"
from the northeast property line, 6'-9" from the east property line, 19-0"
from the south property line)
20'-0" front yard (proposed 42'-0")
4 With the approval of Height Variation No 936, the maximum height of the
addition shall not exceed 26 feet, as measured from the lowest point of existing
grade covered by the structure to the ridge (proposed 19'-0" from the highest
point covered by structure)
5 The approved project shall maintain a maximum of 50% lot coverage, as required
by the RS -4 zoning district (33% proposed) No additional lot coverage is
approved under this application
6 On August 3, 2001, City Staff conducted a foliage analysis on the subject
property and determined that there is no existing foliage on the subject property
that exceeds 16 feet in height and significantly impairs views from neighboring
properties Therefore, City Staff finds that no foliage shall be removed under this
application request.
7 The project shall substantially conform to the plans stamped approved with the
effective date of this approval
8 No outdoor lighting shall be directed toward or result in direct illumination of a
parcel of property or properties other than that upon which such light source is
physically located Individual, nonreflector, incandescent light bulbs shall not
exceed 150 watts each, or an aggregate of 1,000 watts.
9 The Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement is authorized to make
minor modifications to the approved plans and any conditions of approval if such
PC Resolution No. 2001-33
Exhibit "A" — Conditions of Approval
Page 1 of 2
0
modifications will achieve substantially the same results as would strict
compliance with the approved plans and conditions. Otherwise, any substantive
change shall require approval of an amendment to Height Variation Permit No
936 by the Planning Commission.
10. If the proposed facility has not been established (i e building permits obtained)
within one (1) year of the effective date of this resolution, or if construction has
not been completed within one hundred eighty (180) days of the issuance of
building permits, approval of the project shall expire and be of no further effect
unless, prior to expiration, a written request for extension is filed with the
Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement and approved by the
Planning Commission Otherwise, a height variation permit revision must be
approved prior to further development
11. Permitted hours of construction are 7 00 a m. to 7.00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday No work is permitted on Sundays or legal holidays.
12 The construction site shall be kept free of all loose materials resembling trash
and debris in excess of that material used for immediate construction purposes.
Such excess material may include, but is not limited to: the accumulation of
debris, garbage, lumber, scrap metal, concrete, asphalt, piles of earth, salvage
materials, abandoned or discarded furniture, and appliances or other household
fixtures.
13. In the event that a Planning requirement and a Building and Safety requirement
are in conflict with one another, the stricter standard shall apply.
14. No grading is permitted with this approval.
15. All applicable soils/geotechnical reports required by the Building and Safety
Division shall be obtained by the applicant and approved by the City's geologist
prior to building permit issuance.
16. All applicable permits required by the Building and Safety Division shall be
obtained by the applicant prior to commencing work.
P.C. Resolution No. 2001.33
Exhibit "A" - Conditions of Approval
Page 2 of 2