Loading...
PC RES 1997-060P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 97-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING ADDENDUM NO.3 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 32 WITH RESPECT TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 46651 - AMENDMENT NO. 2, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 151 - REVISION "C", AND GRADING PERMIT 1389 - REVISION "A" FOR THE 63 -LOT "SEABREEZE" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CREST ROAD AND HIGHRIDGE ROAD WHEREAS, on October 15, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution No 91-73 certifying Environmental Impact Report No 32, in connection with Tentative Tract Map No 46651, Conditional Use Permit No 151 and Grading Permit No 1389 for a 63 -lot Residential Planned Development on a 59 -acre vacant parcel located at the southwest corner of Crest Road and Highridge Road, and, WHEREAS, on October 1, 1996, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution No 96-88, approving the Addendum No 1 to Environmental Impact Report No 36, in connection with Tentative Tract Map No 46651 - Amendment No. 1 and Conditional Use Permit No. 151 - Revision "A", in order to A) remove a requirement to provide an underground equestrian trail tunnel easement on the property, B) modify a condition of approval to allow a portion of the cost of providing a traffic signal on Crest Road to be paid for by the developer of an adjacent tract in the City of Rolling Hills Estates, C) remove conditions of approval related to an off-site debris basin which is no longer associated with the project, and D) make other minor technical changes to the conditions of approval; and, WHEREAS, on March 18, 1997, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and adopted P.C. Resolution No. 97-14 recommending City Council approval of Addendum No 2 to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), in conjunction with the proposed Tentative Tract Map No 46651 - Amendment No 2, Conditional Use Permit No. 151- Revision "B" and Grading Permit No 1389 - Revision "A", in order to A) allow the export of 80,000 cubic yards of earth from the site, B) modify the timing requirements for two conditions of approval, and, C) remove a condition of approval related to monitoring wells on the site, which were determined to be no longer necessary by the City's geotechnical consultant, and, WHEREAS, on April 15, 1997, the City Council held a public hearing and adopted Resolution No 97-28, approving Addendum No 2 to EIR No 32, and WHEREAS, on October 28, 1997, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider Addendum No 3 to the EIR No 32, in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 151- Revision "C" in order to amend two conditions of approval regarding building facade articulation and roof orientation, and WHEREAS, prior to taking action on the proposed revisions to the approved single family residential project, the Planning Commission considered the information and findings contained in Addendum No 3 to the EIR, and determined that the document was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and local guidelines, with respect thereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the proposed minor change to the approved project, which will amend two conditions of approval (Condition R-1 and R-3 of CUP No. 151 Revision "B") regarding building facade articulation and roof orientation, will occur with the same intent as the project that was previously approved Therefore, pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, approval of Addendum No 3 to the previously - certified EIR, rather than the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, is appropriate for the consideration of the proposed revisions to the Seabreeze project, based on the following findings 1 That subsequent changes proposed to the project do not require important revisions to the previous EIR, since there are no new significant environmental impacts that have been identified, which were not considered in the previous EIR 2 That substantial changes to the project would not occur with respect to the circumstances under which project is undertaken, which would require important revisions to the previous EIR, since there are no new significant environmental impacts that were not considered in the previous EIR 3 That there is no new information of substantial importance to the project which indicates that the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed previously in the EIR, that significant effects previously examined will not be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR, that no mitigation measures or alternatives, previously found not to be feasible, would now in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, or that no mitigation measures or alternatives which were not previously considered in the EIR, would now substantially lessen one or more significant effects of the environment Section 2 That the previously adopted mitigation monitoring program for EIR No 32 - Addendum No 2 will not be amended due to the nature of the minor changes ■ Resolution No 60 Page -•- of proposed Therefore, pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, approval of draft Addendum No. 3 to the previously -certified EIR is appropriate for the consideration of the proposed revisions to the Seabreeze project. Section 3. In approving Addendum No 3 to EIR No. 32, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Addendum No 3 document, attached hereto and made a part thereof, as Exhibit "A" and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, attached hereto by reference and made a part thereof, as Exhibit "B" Section 4- That Addendum No 3 to EIR No. 32 identifies no new potential significant adverse environmental impacts to the areas listed below, beyond those already identified in the Final EER No 32, as a result of the proposed minor amendments regarding building facade articulation and roof orientation, 1. Landform, Geology and Soil 2 Hydrology and Drainage 3. Biological Resources 4 Cultural and Scientific Resources 5. Aesthetics 6. Land Use and Relevant Planning 7 Circulation and Traffic 8 Air Resources 9. Noise 10 Public Services and Utilities 11. Population, Employment and Housing 12 Fiscal Impacts Section 5, That implementation of the revised project to amend two conditions regarding building facade articulation and roof orientation would not require additional mitigation measures to mitigate significant adverse environmental impacts not identified in previously -certified EIR No 32 - Addendum No. 2. Section 6• That, while the implementation of the mitigation measures as discussed in Final EIR No. 32, as well as the modified mitigation monitoring program based on the addenda to the Final EIR, will reduce potential environmental impacts of the project, it is not entirely possible to eliminate project impacts identified in Statement of Overriding Considerations, including impacts to air quality, biological resources and visual/ aesthetics, as provided in Final EIR No 32, and hereby incorporated by reference Section 7. All findings, attachments and Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Resolution Nos 91-73 and 96-88, as adopted by the City Council on October 15, 1991 and October 1, 1996, respectively, are hereby incorporated by reference P C. Resolution No 97-60 Page 3 of 5 Section 8. For the foregoing reasons and based on the information contained in the staff report, minutes, evidence presented at the public hearings and other records of the proceedings, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby approves of Addendum No 3 to Final EIR No. 32, based on the determination that the document was completed in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and State and local guidelines with respect thereto PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of October 1997 by the following vote. AYES Commissioners Alberto, Cartwright, Clark, Ng, Slayden, Vice Chairman Whiteneck, and Chairman Vannorsdall. NOES- None ABSTENTIONS- None ABSENT None Carolynn Petru, AICP Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, and Secretary to the Planning Commission 6N9L Y �:Donald E Vannorsdall Chairman P C Resolution No 97-60 Page 4 of 5 P.C. Resolution No. 97-60 Exhibit "A" ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 32 The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 151 - Revision "C" in conjunction with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as well as State and Local CEQA Guidelines, and finds as follows. The modifications to the conditions of approval would not constitute a significant adverse environmental impact That no modification to the mitigation monitoring program is necessary given the minor nature of the proposed amendment The amendments to the Conditions of Approval would not result in any new or increased impacts to the environment, since these changes will not alter the effectiveness of the conditions of approval and mitigation measures N \GR0UP\PLANNING\RES0S\PC\HEIR3 KAJ P C. Resolution No. 97-60 Page 5 of 5 Tentative Tract Map No 46861 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 1 1 All grading, testing and earthwork will be pie-rTo-r-m-e-d "in Prior the the Issu_a_n_c_eo7 During Grading Department of Pra—nning accordance with the general grading and earthwork Grading Permit, Site Building and Code specifications of the geotechnical report by Leighton and Inspection Enforcement Associates, unless specifically revised by subsequent updates or if required by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. 12 Grading operations shall be under the gene—r-al super—vision Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, of a registered geologist, engineering geologist, or soils Building and Code engineer (Uniform Building Gode) to observe earthwork Enforcment procedure and test fill for conformance to design specifications 13 A minimum of two aaditional borings are recommended Submittal of Data from During Grading, Prior to the Department of Planning, south of lots 3 to 6 during grading and prior to Borings Issuance of Building Building and Code construction to verify the nonexistence of a deep-seated Permits Enforcment potential failure plane Because drill rigs can cause great land disturbance, the final borings should be achieved while the site has been cleared of vegetation and other machinery is disrupting the site If the existence of a slide plane is confirmed, or lower strength bedrock is encountered, the developer shall provide a means to tabilize the slope, subject to the approval of the City This, along with the revegetation of all created slopes and the provision of drainage facilities, will aid in stabilizing the project site. ___TT Frequent In -grading inspections should be conducted Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, during site development These inspections are Building and Code necessary to substantiate previous geologic findings and Enforcement to discover unforeseen conditions that may be exposed during grading Any unanticipated adverse conditions encountered should be evaluated by the project engineering geologist and the soils engineer, and the appropriate recommendations made and followed AIR QUALITY Fugitive dust emissions will be conWo-Iled with regular Site Inspection During Grading Department of PFa—nning watering or other airborne dust reducing measures in Building and Code compliance with SCAOMD Rule 403 and as directed by Enforcement POqe } P.C. Resolution No. 97-50 �J Tentative Tract Map No 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 P.C. Resolution No. 97_60 E 11 -M-1TTWION MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING II construction equipment must be maintained an ept Site inspection During Grading Department of Planning, tuned to reduce emissions from heavy equipment Building and Code Enforcement grading activities will cease during periods of wins Site Inspection During Grading Department of Panning, greater than 25 miles per hour Budding and Code Enforcement 2.4 The project will maintain convenient access to transitVerification of Prior to the Approva oDepartment of Planning, stops and provide for easy pedestrian access Maintenance of Access Final Tract Map Building and Code Enforcement 2.5 Low emission mobile construction equipment shall e Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, used, where feasible Budding and Code Enforcement HYDROLOGY 31 An erosion and sediment -transport contro pan Approved Erosion--a-n-cF-nor o e Issuance of Department o u is o s incorporating standard erosion control practices shall be Sediment -Transport Grading Permit implemented Standard erosion control practices include Control Plan retaining sediments within project sites during construction periods by the use of catch basing, using interceptor ditches and benches to prevent gullying of lopes, and preparing and implementing erosion control plans in accordance with the appropriate regulatory agencies 2 he project proponents all conduct a hydro ogy study to Approvedy ro ogy Prior to the Issuance o Department o u is o s determine adverse impacts of the subject development Study Grading Permit upon natural drainage on the subject property and upon properties located downslope from the subject development and the improvements necessary to mitigate those impacts 33 If the City a ermines that an on-site detention basin is ra mg/ ramage an Pnor to the Issuance of Department of Public Works needed, the project proponent shall construct it. Check Grading Permit 34 ubdrains shall be placed in all keyways and at 2 - oot Gra ing/ rainage an Prior to the ssuance aDepartment of Pu-Sfic-Wo-r-Fs- vertical intervals where compacted fill is placed over Check Grading Permit natural slope areas 5 Material treatment within the detention basin will inc ude Drainage/Lan scope Prior to the Issuance o epartment o Public Works low height landscaping and shall be designed to prohibit Plan Check Grading Permit inappropriate recreational use Page 2 P.C. Resolution No. 97_60 E 11 Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATIONA A —PATITYTMSINONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 3 he following water conservation procedures shall e Landscape Plan Check Pnor to the ssuanceo Department of anning, incorporated into the project elements where feasible to Grading Permit Building and Code reduce surface runoff landscape with low-water using Enforcement plants, install efficient irrigation systems that minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize the water that will reach the plant roots, such as dnp Irrigation, sod moisture sensors; and automatic irrigation irrigation systems 3.7 Velocity reducers and channel stabilizers will be installed Drainage Plan Check Prior tote issuance of Department of Public Works to eliminate erosion potential in the secondary drainage Grading Permit course below Crest Road to the head of McCarreli Canyon Protection works at this outlet will be improved and corrected to prevent erosion beneath the outlet apron BIOLOnICAL RESOURCES Specimen trees shall be provided in the project an scape Landscape Plan ec nor tote ssuance o Department of Plg-n—ni-n—g, plan Native trees shall be included in the plan Grading Permit Building and Code Enforcement Lights from the proposed projectshould not obtrude into Approved CC&R's Prior to the pprova o Department of anning, McCarroll Canyon Restrictions on landscape backyard Final Tract Map Building and Code lighting adjacent to the wash and arroyo can minimize Enforcement their effect on wildlife Lighting shall be low-level and all avoid direct lighting of the canyon, and shall conform th City standards F 4.3 A U.S.rmy Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit and Proper Permit Acquisitior Priorto the Issuance of W epartmen a California Department of Fish and Game 1603 Grading Permit of Planning, Budding and Streambed Alteration Agreement shall be obtained by the Code Enforcement project proponent, if required One or more escape routes shall be established dunng Grading Plan Check Prior tote Issuance of epartment aPlanning, catling and construction to allow wildlife to reach adjacen Grading Permit Building and Code undisturbed areas. Enforcement 5 A conceptual mitigation plan shall be created to replace Approved Mitlga—b—o—nPla—n Approved Mitigation Plan USFWS, Department o impacted coastal sage scrub onsite Impacted coastal Planning, Budding and Code sage scrub will be replaced at a ratio of 2.1 Following Enforcement grading, a final tally of coastal sage scrub that was removed will be calculated The plan will include planting, maintenance, and monitoring details Page 3 P.C. Resolution No. 97-60 0 Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STTTM REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING All portions of the project site outside the propos-eU— Site Inspection Prior to Commen-c-e-m-en-t-oT Department of Pla-n-n-rn—g, grading limits shall be avoided during construction Bright Grading Building and Code orange plastic fencing, stakes, flags or other markers shall Enforcement be used to delimit the areas that are to be avoided by construction activities 4.7 A qualified biologist (monitor) shall be onsite during all . Site Inspection G-un-ng-G-ra-ding USFWS, CDFG, Departmeni Gearing and grubbing activities on TT 46651 to insure that of Planning, Building and no take of the California gnatcatcher occurs The Code Enforcement monitor(s) shall have the authority to stop all activities until appropriate corrective measures have been completed, if necessary The monitor(s) shall also be required to report violations immediately to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game 4 8 No dumping of trash or storage of construction materials Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, shall occur within the areas proposed as undeveloped on Building and Code the project site. Enforcement --- 4T All personnel present on the site during all construction Ve-rification of Ins0c"ToWn Prior to Commenc-e-m-e-nt-o-T Department of P15-n-Win—g, activities shall receive instruction regarding the presence Grading Building and Code of the threatened California gnatcatcher Enforcement 4.10 If the Pacific pocket mouse are discovered anywhere on Competed studies, as Pnor to Issuance of Grading USFWS, Department of the peninsula, the developer shall consult with the United required Permit Planning, Building and Code States Fish and Wildlife Service on which studies are Enforcement required under the federal Endangered Species Act and shall conduct those studies NOISE 51 Residential development must be in comp ll­an�cewithTitle Building an Che-cR*— Prior to the Issuan-c-e-o-f— Department of Planning, 24 of the State of California Administrative Code (noise Building Permits Building and Code insulation standards) Enforcement Construction activity will be limited to the hours of 7 00 Site Inspection During Grading/During - De—partment of Planning, a m to 5.00 p m , Monday through Saturday No Construction Building and Code construction activities shall be allowed on Sundays or Enforcement holidays After consultation with the developer and residents in the surrounding neighborhoods, the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement may further limit the hours of construction and grading, as necesary Page 4 P.C. Resolution No. 97-60 11 11 Tentative Tract Map No 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION A RMONITORING REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING Construction equipment must employ sound restncbon Site Inspection During Grading/During Department of PWn�ning, devices to reduce noise levels, if necessary Construction Budding and Code Enforcement 5.4 The City will review all plot plans to determine the nature Landscape Plan Check, Prior to the Issuance of Department o ann ng, and extent of sound attenuation elements (e g , Building Plan Check Grading Permit; Prior to Building and Code landscaping berms and/or walls) provided by the Issuance of Building Enforcement developer that may be necessary to buffer adjacent Permits noise -sensitive uses from noise -generating land uses 5.5 Raul —trucks shall be profiibited fromprohibit queuing at the project Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, site prior to 7*00 a m After consultation with the Building and Code developer and residents in the surrounding Enforcement neighborhoods, the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement may further limit the hours of queuing, as necessary LIGHT AND GLARE I exterior lighting, either decorative or security, shall e Approved CC&RrF,— Prior to Approval of FinalDepartment of PFa—nnTn—g, erected downward to shield it from adjacent property and Building Plan Check Tract Map, Prior to the Building and Code o prevent glare to motorists and shall conform to City Issuance of Building Enforcement standards Permits Landscape buffers should be used to screen adjacent and Landscape Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, onsite uses from automobile and spillover lighting. Grading Permit Budding and Code Enforcement No night lighting should be allowed on the un istu aApproved s, Prior to the proval o Department of Planning, areas of the site in order to avoid potential Impacts to Building Pian Check Final Tract Map; Prior to the Building and Code ildlife Issuance of Building Enforcement Permits 6.4 Landscaping in and adjacent to ffie detention basin to Landscape Plan ec Pnor to the Issuance of Department o anning, minimize reflection when ponded water is present shall be Grading Permit Building and Code incorporated Enforcement 6 Backyardlighting adjacenttot the was shall e restricted Building Plan ec Prior to the ssuance o Department of anning, in conformance with the Development Code standards in Building Permits Buiding and Code order to minimize their effect on wildlife Enforcement --77 LAND USE AND ZONING Development of the property for residential use sha e m Grading PlanChe—c-, Prior to the ssuance o Department of Planning, accordance with the development standards of the Final Tract Map Check, Grading Permit, Prior to the Building and Code Residential Planned Development (RPD) as established Building Plan Check Approval of Final Tract Map Enforcement through the conditions of approval for the Conditional Use Prior to the Issuance of Permit (CUP) and grading permit. Building Permits Page 5 P.C. Resolution No. 97-60 v *1 Tentative Tract Map No 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION MEASUREPARTY RESPONSIBLE STA US REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 7.2 All landscaping schemes shall be compatible and Landscape Plan check Prior to the ssuance o Department oanning, harmonious with the characteristics of the natural setting, Grading Permit Building and Code and incorporate drought -tolerant species as required by Enforcement the City TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 8.1 The intersection approaches along Highridge Road should pprove treet Prior to the Approval of Department of Public Works be constructed to allow for two lanes, one for left turns Improvement Plans Final Tract Map only The proposed haul route{s} for soil export will be reviewed Approved Truckoute Prior to ffie ssuance o Department of POTEWo-Ts- by the City. Trucks exporting fill from the project site shall Plan Grading Permit be prohibited from utilizing Crenshaw Boulevard, due to rtc steep slope FIRE PROTECTION 1 Adequate offsite public and onsite private fire hydrants will Approved Fire ro echon Pnor to the Approva a epartment o be required. The precise number and location of the fire Plans Final Tract Map Planning, Budding and Code hydrants will be determined after the fire department has Enforcement had an opportunity to review the plot plan 9.2 Fire flows of up to 1,250 gpm at 20 psi rest ual pressure Approved Fire Pro!ection Prior to the Approval of LACFD, DeFa—rtment of will be required Plans Final Tract Map Planning, Building and Code Enforcment The applicant must submit plot plans that show the- Final Tract Map a Pnor to the Approval ofFD, Department of - access road and the turning area for fire department Final Tract Map Planning, Building and Code pproval Enforcement 9.4 Dead -ending streets shall terminate in a cul-de-sac or Final Tract Map rheck Prior to the Approval o epartment o Cher approved turning area (fire lanes are not required for Final Tract Map Planning, Building and Code the project). Enforcement 5 Access for fire department apparatus and personnel to Final Tract Map ec nor to the Approval of FD, Department o and into all structures shall be required. All structures will Final Tract Map Planning, Budding and Code comply with all local fire codes Enforcement POLICE PROTECTION 10.1 A tamper-resistant burglar alarm systemshould a Building Plan ec nor to the Issuance of artment o anrnng, incorporated into the design of the residential units, if Building Permits ding and Code JEn feasible orcement Page 6 P.C. Resolution No, 97-60 Tentative Tract Map No 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 7 P.C. Resolution No. c)7-60 1• MITIGATION PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 16-2 All main entryways to the residential units should be Building Plan Check Pnor to the Issuance of Department o Planning, visible from the street and well illuminated, if feasible. Building Permits Building and Code Enforcement 0.3 All main entry doors should e of solid core construction Building Plan Ch9ck Prior to the Issuance of Department oPlanning, and contain "peep viewers" and dead -bolt locks, if Building Permits Building and Code feasible. Enforcement PARKS RAIL 11 1 The developer shall dedicate and improve Kajima Trail for Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval o Department of Planning, pedestrian purposes according to the standards in the Final Tract Map Building and Code Conceptual Trails Plan. The Kajima Trail shall be located Enforcement on the east side of the canyon rather than on the bottom wherever possible to reduce habitat disturbance. The developer shall improve Crooked PatchTrail to Final Tract Map ec Prior tote Approva o Department of Planning, Conceptual Trails Plan standards and realign the trail Final Tract Map Building and Code closer to its official dedicated easement. Enforcement 1.3 The developer shall improve the Crest Ranch Trail in its Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of Department oPlanning, existing location to allow pedestrian use, unless an Final Tract Map Building and Code alternative equestrian trail route is provided. Enforcement 1 f 4 The developer shall dedicate and improve a Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of Department of Pra—nning, pedestrian/equestrian trail easement parallel to the Final Tract Map Building and Code Crooked Patch Trail. Enforcement 5 To create a link between the trails in Rolling Hills Estates Final Tract Map CReck Prior tot the Approval of Department of Planning, and the Crooked Patch Trail, the developer shall dedicate Final Tract Map Building and Code and improve a pedestrian/equestrian trail between the two Enforcement rails along the east edge of the property adjacent to Highridge Road. UTILITIES 2.1 The protect will be required to meet the energy Building Plan aPrior to the ssuance o Department of Planning, conservation standards adoped by the California Energy Building Permits Building and Code Commission (Titre 24). Enforcement Page 7 P.C. Resolution No. c)7-60 1• Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIG ION MEASURE MONITORING REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 12 2 o conserve water, efficient landscape irrigation systems Landscape Plan Check Prior to Issuance of BuildiFg Department of Panning, ill be installed that minimize runoff and evaporation and Permits Building and Code minimize water that will reach the plant roots Mulch will Enforcement be used extensively in landscaped areas Drip irrigation oiI moisture sensors and automatic irrigation systems are few methods of increasing irrigation efficiency AESTHETICSNIEWSHED 1 The n ge ine height of all structuress all be smite as Grading Plan Ch -e ,- Prior to the ssuance o Department of P15—nn-linig, required by the City to establish view corridors over the Final Tract Map Check Grading Permit, Prior to the Building and Code site from Crest Road and homes on Highndge Road Approval of Final Tract Map Enforcement CULTURAL RESOURCES 1 The project archaeologist shall submit a protocol to the City for monitoring and for the discovery of archaeological Approved Protoco,— Submittal of Report Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits: Site Department of Pra—n—nTn—g, Building and Code resources A qualified archaeologist shall be present Documenting Findings Inspection Enforcement wring grading activities, as required, to evaluate cultural resources on the site If archaeological resources are found, all work in the affected area shall be temporarily suspended and the resources shall be removed and preserved All "finds" shall be immediately reported to the Director of Planning, Budding and Code Enforcement All rchaeological finds shall be first offered to the City for preservation At the completion of grading, the project archaeologist shall submit a report detailing findings, if any Page 8 P.C. Resolution No. 97-60 v A