Loading...
PC RES 1996-031 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 96- 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 32 TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN CONNECTION WITH TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 46651 - AMENDMENT NO 1 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 151 - REVISION "A" FOR 63 LOT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CREST ROAD AND HIGHRIDGE ROAD WHEREAS, on October 15, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution No. 91-73 certifying Environmental Impact Report No. 32, in connection with Tentative Tract Map No. 46651, Conditional Use Permit No. 151 and Grading Permit No. 1389 for an 63 lot Residential Planned Development on a 59 acre vacant parcel located at the southwest corner of Crest Road and Highridge Road; and, WHEREAS, on August 27, 1996, after notice issued pursuant to the provisions of the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider Addendum No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 32, in conjunction with proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 -Amendment No. 1 and Conditional Use Permit No. 151 - Revision "A", at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence; and, WHEREAS, prior to taking action on the proposed amendments and revisions to the approved single family residential project, the Planning Commission considered the information and findings contained in Addendum No. 1 to EIR No. 32, and determined that the document was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and local guidelines, with respect thereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That the proposed changes to the project, which include A) allowing the streets within thep roject privately owned and maintained; B) allowing a gate entrance to the site on Crest Road; C) removing a requirement to provide an underground equestrian trail tunnel easement on the property; D) modifying a condition of approval to allow the developer to pay a fair share cost of providing a traffic signal on Crest Road; E) removing conditions of approval related to an off-site debris basin which is no longer associated with the project; and, F) making other minor technical changes to the conditions of approval, all involve aspects of the project which were previously identified as part of the developed ortion of the project. Therefore, pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, approval of Addendum No. 1 to the previously certified Final EIR, rather than the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, is appropriate for the consideration of the proposed revisions to the single family residential, based on the following findings: 1. That subsequent changes proposed to the project do not require important revisions to the previous EIR, since there are no new significant environmental impacts that have been identified, which were not considered in the previous EIR. 2. That substantial changes to the project would not occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which would require important revisions to the previous EIR, since there are no new significant environmental impacts that were not considered in the previous EIR. 3. That there is no new information of substantial importance to the project which indicates that the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed previously in the EIR; that significant effects previously examined will not be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; that no mitigation measures or alternatives, previously found not to be feasible, would now in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or that no mitigation measures or alternatives which were not previously considered in the EIR, would now substantially lessen one or more significant effects of the environment. Section 2: That the revised project will not result in any new impacts or any increases in the impacts identified in the previous EIR based on the findings included in the Addendum No. 1 document, attached hereto and made a part thereof, as Exhibit "A". Section 3: In recommending approval of the Addendum No. 1 to EIR No. 32, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Addendum No. 1 document, attached hereto and made a part thereof, as Exhibit "A". Section 4: The Addendum No. 1 to EIR No. 32 identifies no new potential significant adverse environmental impacts to the areas listed below, beyond those already identified in the Final EIR No. 36, as a result of the proposed revisions to the single family residential project: 1. Landform, Geology, and Soils 2. Hydrology and Drainage 3. Biological Resources 4. Cultural and Scientific Resources 5. Aesthetics 6. Land Use and Relevant Planning 7. Circulation and Traffic 8. Air Resources 9. Noise 10. Public Services and Utilities 11. Population, Employment and Housing 12. Fiscal Impacts P.C. Resolution No. 96-31 Page 2 of 3 • Section 5: That implementation of the revised project would not require additional mitigation measures or deletions/modifications to the mitigation measures included in the Final EIR. That, while the implementation of mitigation measures as discussed in Final EIR No. 36 will further reduce these impacts, it is not possible to entirely eliminate cumulative impacts to the areas of concern listed in Section 1, above. Therefore, the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, as provided in Final EIR No. 32, are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 6: All findings, attachments and Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Resolution Nos. 91-73, as adopted by the City Council on October 15, 1991, are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 7: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information and findings contained in the Staff Report, minutes, and evidence presented at the public hearings, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby recommends approval of the Addendum No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 32 to the City Council, based on the determination that the document was completed in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and State and local guidelines with respect thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 27th day of August 1996 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Alberio, Cartwright, Franklin, Ng, Whiteneck, Vice Chairman Vannorsdall , and Chairman Clark NOES: ABSTENTIONS: ABSENT: CC • CaSe, Lawrence E. Clark Chairman Carolynn P tru Director of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement, and Secretary to the Planning Commission P.C. Resolution No. 96-31 Page 3 of 3 t 0 6 P.C. Resolution No. 96- 31 Exhibit "A" ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 32 The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed amendments to Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 and revisions to Conditional Use Permit No. 151 in conjunction with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as well as State and Local CEQA Guidelines, and find as follows: The privatization of the streets within the tract will not impact traffic and circulation in the area, since the streets are truly local roads which are not needed as a thoroughfare in the collector and arterial road network of the City. The privatization of the streets will not impact public services since proper maintenance of the streets will be accomplished through the formation of a Homeowners Association and the creation of CC&Rs for the subdivision. The privatization of the streets will not impact public recreation since pedestrian and equestrian trails would still be required to be dedicated and developed as part of the project. The controlled entrance to the project on Crest Road would not impact traffic and circulation since there would be adequate area for the expected number of cars to que up on the entrance street in front of the gate. The controlled entrance to the project would not impact public services since the design of the entrance street and gated are required to comply with the requirements of the Los Angeles County Fire Department to ensure access to the site during an emergency situation. That removal of the underground equestrian trail tunnel easement would not impact public recreation since the project is still conditions to explore providing an at-grade crossing for equestrians on Crest Road to connect the equestrian trails on the project site with the trails in the City of Rolling Hills Estates. That the modification to the conditions of approval regarding the potential traffic signal on Crest Road would not impact traffic and circulation since the conditions would be modified to allow the developer to only pay for its fair share of the cost of providing such a signal. That the removal of the conditions of approval relating to the off-site debris basin would not impact drainage, since the project would still be required to provide an on-site detention basin, as well as specific funding for the City to pursue the off-site drainage facility as a separate project. The amendments to the Conditions of Approval would not result in any new or increased impacts to the environment, since these changes will not alter the effectiveness of the Conditions of Approval, and will act, instead, to ensure that impacts of the project are fully mitigated. M:\USERS\CAROLYNN\WPWIN601KAJIMA\KAJAEIR.PC