Loading...
PC RES 1994-031P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 94-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 23# THEREBY ALLOWING A FORTY-TWO INCH (4201) HIGH FREE-STANDING WALL AND A PORTION OF A DRIVEWAY GATE AND PILASTER TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 3324 CROWNVIEW DRIVE WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Trent Hofferber, representing the property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Charles Hof f erber, has requested Encroachment Permit No. 23, to place a forty-two inch (4211) freestanding wall and portion of a 61-011 high driveway gate and pilaster within the City's right-of-way; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) and local CEQA guidelines, the proposed project has been found to be categorically exempt (Class III & V); and, WHEREAS, after notice issued pursuant to the provisions of the Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code, a duly noticed public hearing was held on June 14, 1994 and July 12, 1994, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That, as modified, the. encroachment is in the best interest of the City since the forty-two inch (4211) high wall, driveway gate and pilaster will act as a physical barrier to prevent passersby from falling or driving down the extreme slope which makes up the front yard area of the lot. Section 2: That the encroachment will not be detrimental to public's health and welfare since the wall would not interfere with traffic flow or intersection visibility along the street. Section 3: The Encroachment Permit is necessary since there is no other feasible location for the subject portion of the proposed fence due to the transitional slope that exists between the front of the property at Crownview Drive and the pad on which the residence is situated (and where the pool is proposed to be located). Section 4:. That the wall will be designed in the safest manner possible; the wall is freestanding in nature, therefore, no structural engineering review is necessary. Section S:. The time within which judicial review of the decision reflected in this Resolution, if available, must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information and findings included in the Staff Report, and records of the proceedings, the Planning Commission hereby Approves Encroachment Permit No. 23 for the encroachment of a forty-two inch (4211) high freestanding wall running parallel to the front property line and a portion of the driveway gate and pilaster that will be reduced in height from seventy-two inches (7211) to forty-two inches (4211) at 3324 Crownview Drive, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which are necessary to preserve the public health, safety, and general welfare in the area. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 12th day of July 1994. Gilbert Alberio, Chairman Bret Br )6rnard AICP Directr of P K nning, Building and Code Enforcement and Secretary to the Planning Commission P.C. Resolution No. 94-31 Page 2 of 4 EXHIBIT "All CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 23 (3324 CROWNVIEW DRIVE) The property owner shall obtain a formal Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department. 2) Prior to the issuance of an Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department, the property owner shall provide a notarized hold -harmless agreement to the Planning, Building & Code Enforcement Department. 3) The property owner shall agree, in writing, to remove the encroachment at the direction of the Public Works Director on ten (10) days notice except in emergency situations where removal maybe required on shorter notice. If the owner fails to remove the encroachment within the specified time, the City will do the work and the property owner will be billed. 4) The property owner must obtain liability insurance (500,000-$1,000,000), naming the City as additionally insured, and provide a copy of said insurance policy to the Director of Public Works on an annual basis. 5) The property owner must record the above conditions as conditions running with the land to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. 6) All portions of the encroachment into the public right-of- way shall not exceed 4211 in height. 7) No light fixtures shall be permitted on the wall/fence. 8) The maximum encroachment of the wall/fence into the public right-of-way shall not exceed 31-011, as measured from the front property line (as measured from the plans date stamped as received on January 31, 1994). 9) The landowner shall provide the City with revised plans of the reduced height driveway gate and pilaster for review and approval by the Director of Planning, Building & Code Enforcement within 30 days of the City's approval becoming final. The encroachment shall be modified in accordance with the approved plans. P.C. Resolution No. 94-31 Page 3 of 4 • • 10) Within 30 days of this approval, the property owner shall submit, in writing, a statement that they have read and agree to comply with all of the conditions of approval set forth in this Exhibit "A". Failure to provide such a statement shall render this approval null and void. dskI0/ep23re P.C. Resolution No. 94-31 Page 4 of 4