Loading...
PC RES 1978-051RESOLUTION P.C. N0. 78- 51 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF CODE AMENDMENT NO. 5, REVISING CHAPTER 1, PART 1, SECTION 9113 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE WHEREAS, the City has initiated Code Amendment No. 5, Height Variation; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held public hearings on this matter on August 8, August 22, and November 14, 1978, at which time all interested par- ties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That the Code revision is necessary to clarify and amend the language of the Code. Section 2: That a Negative Declaration was issued for the project. Section 3: For the foregoing reasons, the Planning -Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby recommends approval of Code Amendment No. 5, pur- suant to Exhibit "A", attached. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of November, 1978. 'Sharon W. Hightower Directof of Planning and Secretary to the Commission EXHIBIT "A" 9113 HEIGHT VARIATION A. Purpose Any individual or persons desiring to construct a residence or an addition to an existing residence exceeding sixteen (16) feet in height may apply for a Height Variation Permit, which, if granted pursuant to the procedures contained herein, will permit said individual to construct a residential structure not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height, measured in the manner as established in this section. B. Procedure 1. Any person desiring to apply for a Height Variation Permit shall complete and fill out an application and submit it to the Director of Planning, to- gether with a fee as established by Resolution of the City Council. The Director may grant the applicant permission to build a residential structure to a maximum height of thirty (30) feet if the Director finds as follows: a. Notice of the application to exceed sixteen (16) feet in height has been given to property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the lot. b. The proposed structure is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize view obstruction. C. A view impairment for that portion over sixteen (16) feet high may not significantly impair the primary view from a property or properties identified as having a view per this section. d. The proposed structure is not located on a ridge or promontory. e. The structure does not significantly impair a view or vista from public property (parks, major thoroughfare, bikeways, walkways, equestrian trails, etc.) which has been identified in the City's General Plan, Coastal Plan, or City approved viewing areas. 2. In approving a permit, the Planning Director, Planning Commission, or City Council may make the permit subject to such reasonable conditions as they deem necessary. 31. In the event the Director of Planning refuses to grant the permit or in the event the Director grants a permit and an interested party objects to the granting of the permit, an appeal may be made to the Planning Commission. In order for the Planning Commission to overrule the Director of Planning, it must specifically determine, in the case of an appeal by an applicant, that all findings listed herein have been met or, in an appeal by an interested party other than the applicant, that the applicant failed to comply with or meet any of the above -listed conditions. 4. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council, which, in order to grant a permit, must determine that the findings listed in this section have been met by the applicant. 5. Anyone appealing a decision of the Planning Director or Planning Commission must file a written request, together with a fee as established by Resolution of the City Council, within fifteen (15) days after the decision is made. C. View Lot Parcels located within the City having the characteristics listed below shall be considered to have a view for the purposes of this part. A lot shall not be con- sidered a view lot if a view obstruction would occur from a structure which meets the other requirements of this Code and could be built or modified without variance within the zoning district in which it occurs. Resolution P.C. No. 78-51 1. There exists a principal identifiable view, not viewed from within the set- backs, which view will be determined by the Director of Planning. This will be applicable to both structures and vacant lots. No part of a structure constructed with a height variation or variance or which would have required a height variation or variance when originally constructed had this ordinance been in effect shall be used asoma principal viewing area. 2. The principal view is a scene, not located within the immediate area, such as the ocean, Li A. basin, City lights, harbor, shoreline, or off -shore islands. D. Method of Measuring Height 1. For the purpose of measuring height on lots which slope uphill from the street of access, sixteen (16) feet shall be measured from the existing grade at the highest point on the lot to be covered by the structure to the ridgeline or the highest point of the structure. 2. For lots sloping downhill from the street of access, the sixteen (16) feet height limitation shall be measured from the average elevation of the property line abutting the street of access to the ridgeline or the highest point of the structure. 3. For lots sloping in the same direction as the street -of access, lots with a building pad at a different level than the street, or lot configurations not previously discussed, sixteen (16) feet shall be measured from existing grade at the highest elevation covered by the structure to the ridgeline or highest point of the structure. 4. On sloping lots, a structure which steps with the slope of the lot will be allowed; however, no portion of the structure shall exceed thirty (30) feet in height when measured from the top of the lowest foundation or slab to the ridgeline or high point of the structure. The thirty (30) foot height shall not exceed a horizontally projected sixteen (16) foot height line (from the high point of the uphill step of the structure). Furthermore, at no point may the top of the foundation (not including any crippleifwafl)-be-greaEer-'Eha"n five (5) feet above the average elevation of the -finished grade, where it touches said foundation. Page Two Exhibit "A" of Resolution P.C. No. 78-51