Loading...
PC MINS 19920331M I N U T E S PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING MARCH 31, 1992 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:15 PM by Chairman Katherman at the Hesse Park Community Room, 29301 Hawthorne Boulevard. II. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO, BYRD, CLARK, HAYES, MOWLDS AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. ABSENT: COMMISSIONER LORENZEN (Excused - See Below). ALSO PRESENT: ACTING DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CAROLYNN PETRU AND ASSOCIATE PLANNER TERRY SILVERMAN. For the record, Chairman Katherman noted Commissioner Lorenzen's request for an excused absence due to illness. III. FLAG SALUTE At the request of the Chairman, Mr. Beringer led in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. STAFF o Acting Director Petru distributed communications regarding Subregions 7 and 8 to the Commission. o Upon an inquiry from staff, the date of May 23, 1992 was agreed upon for a field trip to view the Salvation Army site. March 31, 1992 1 0Acting Director Petru confirmed that staff will notify the Commission of specifics pertaining to the upcoming Planning Commissioners' Institute. B. COMMISSION 0 The Commission agreed to delay discussion of the Hous- ing Element from the special meeting date of April 23, 1992 until the regular Planning Commission meeting of May 12, 1992. 0 Commissioner Clark suggested that the Commission con- sider the idea of a quitting time for Planning Commission meet- ings. Acting Director Petru asked that this be brought up during discussion of Planning Commission Rules and Procedures, tentatively scheduled for the April 28, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. There was a consensus of the Commission that the meet- ing agendas should reflect that, "No requests to speak will be accepted after the completion of remarks by the first speaker on an item." V. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Commissioner Clark moved, seconded by Commissioner Hayes, to approve the Consent Calendar as follows: A. Minutes of March 4, 1992. B. P.C. Resolution No. 92-21; denying Variance No. 317, 27841 Western Avenue. C. P.C. Resolution No. 92-22; upholding the appeal of staff approval of Minor Exception Permit No. 429, thereby denying the project located at 27892 Palos Verdes Drive East. There being no objection, the motion for approval of the Consent Calendar was so ordered by Chairman Katherman, with Commissioner Alberio abstaining from the Minutes of March 4, 1992 (due to his absence from that meeting) and Commissioner Lorenzen absent. March 31, 1992 2 Vi. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 50666 AND 50667, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NOS. 23004 AND 29070, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 162 AND 163, GRADING PERMIT NO. 1541 AND COASTAL PERMIT NO. 103; PVLHC AND ZUCKERMAN, SUBREGIONS 7 AND 8 PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH. Commissioner Byrd explained that he would continue to abstain from consideration of the project. Acting Director Petru provided the staff report with the recommendation that the Commission recommend to City Council that the Environmental Impact Report be certified and the Vesting Ten- tative Tract Maps, Parcel Maps, Coastal Permit, Conditional Use Permits and Grading Permit be approved. She outlined recommenda- tions made by the Planning Commission at a previous meeting; pointed out that the public hearing was closed; and explained procedures for Planning Commission action on the project. Associate Planner Silverman distributed and reviewed revised Resolutions and Conditions of Approval for the project. Referring to Commissioner Clark's Concept Proposal on "Subregion 7 Golf Course Conditions of Approval Dealing with Affordability/Accessibility for the Residents of Rancho Palos Verdes," the Commission discussed the idea of green fee discounts and tee time reservation priorities for City residents, as well as a City golf club affiliation with the Subregion 7 golf course. A communication from Mr. Eddie K. Randall stating his support of green fee discounts for City residents was noted. The idea of structuring green fees to include a user tax for allocation to the City's General Revenue Fund was also discussed. The applicant's representative, Mr. Michael A. Mohler, 25200 La Paz Road, Laguna Hills, stated his impression that special group green fee discounts and tee time reservation priorities may be in violation of the Coastal Specific Act and would also economically unfeasible for the operator of the golf course. Acting Director Petru related staff's understanding that special group green fee discounts and club membership allocations would, indeed, be in violation of the Coastal Specific Act. However, she explained staff's understanding that the City could consider a minimal amount of tee time reservation priorities and a user tax for allocation to the City's General Fund. March 31, 1992 3 MOTION: Commissioner Clark moved to recommend that green fee discounts for Rancho Palos Verdes residents, as included in his Concept Proposal entitled, "Subregion 7 Golf Course Condi- tions of Approval Dealing with Affordability/Accessibility for the Residents of Rancho Palos Verdes," be adopted as part of the Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 163 and that the exact percentages be left as recommendations and specifically presented to the City Council as such. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Alberio and passed by the following 3-2 majority roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS ALBERIOt CLARK AND MOWLDS. NOES: COMMISSIONER HAYES AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT: COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. MOTION: Commissioner Clark moved to recommend that a priority allocation of tee time reservations for City residents, as included in his Concept Proposal entitled, "Subregion 7 Golf course Conditions of Approval Dealing with Affordability/Accessibility for the Residents of Rancho Palos Verdes," be adopted as part of the Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 163 and that the exact percentages be left as recommendations and specifically presented to City Coun- cil as such. There was discussion as to the idea of allocating a percent- age of the prioritized tee time reservations for the Long Point hotel, should it be constructed. Commissioner Clark amended the above motion to include that a certain percentage of the prioritized tee time reservations to be determined by the City Council shall be allocated for Long Point hotel guests. Commissioner Alberio seconded the amended motion and it was passed by the following unanimous roll call vote: March 31, 1992 4 • • AYES COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO, CLARK, HAYES, MOWLDS AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN. COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT. COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. MOTION: Commissioner Clark moved to recommend that the af- filiation of a City golf club with the Subregion 7 golf club as included in his Concept Proposal entitled, "Subregion 7 Golf Course Conditions of Approval Dealing with Affordability/Accessibility for the Residents of Rancho Palos Verdes," be adopted as part of the Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 163 and that the exact percentages be left as recommendations and specifically presented to City Coun- cil as such. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Alberio and defeated by the following 3-2 roll call vote: AYES. COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO AND CLARK. NOES: COMMISSIONERS HAYES, MOWLDS AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. ABSTAIN. COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT' COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. At this time, Chairman Katherman called attention to per- tinent communications (of record) from: Mr. John Holzman of the Peninsula Silent Flyers Organization, Sunshine, the California Native Plant Society; Palos Verdes Land Holdings Company and Zuckerman (applicant); Mr. J. J. D. McLaren; the Coastal Conser- vation Coalition; and Mr. Bill Ailor of the Palos Verdes Penin- sula Land Conservancy (PVPLC). At 8:45 PM there was a recess until 9:00 PM when the meeting reconvened in regular agenda order. At this time, Commissioner Mowlds offered the following motion. March 31, 1992 5 MOTION: Commissioner Mowlds moved to reconsider the Commission's vote earlier in the meeting with regard to the af- filiation of a City golf club with the Subregion 7 golf club. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Clark and passed by the following 3-2 majority roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO, CLARK AND MOWLDS. NOES: COMMISSIONER HAYES AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT: COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. MOTION: Commissioner Mowlds moved that the Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 163 include that the Sub- region 7 golf club shall have some type of club arrangement for City residents with an up -front fee to be paid in exchange for a certain number of golf rounds per year, the specifics to be determined. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Alberio and passed by the following 3-2 roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO, CLARK AND MOWLDS. NOES: COMMISSIONER HAYES AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT: COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. Acting Director Petru addressed information raised in per- tinent written communications (as noted earlier in the meeting by Chairman Katherman) from: Mr. J. J. D. McLaren, Mr. Bill Ailor (Palos Verdes Peninsula Conservancy Coalition); Mr. John Holzman; Sunshine; the California Native Plant Society; and the Coastal Conservation Coalition. She clarified that: the project is conditioned to require deed restrictions on the golf course for passive and active recreational uses; the mitigation monitor- ing program includes a project biologist to be on site for an ex- tended period of time; all identified habitat areas would be fenced prior to grading activity; and the trails along Palos Verdes Drive South would include a Class II bikeway within the right-of-way, as well as a soft -footed pedestrian trail and a Class I bikeway separate from the road. March 31, 1992 6 Mr. Bill Ailor of the PVPLC, 1052 Via Palestra, Palos Verdes :Estates, came forward to address the need to preserve natural habitat areas. He suggested a conservation easement for preser- vation of gnatcatcher habitat and bluff areas, as well as an on- going biological survey to ensure the continued preservation of the biological resources on the site. Sunshine, 6 Limetree Lane, asked that the golf course be designed after a public amenities plan is prepared. Acting Director Petru related staff's understanding that the project is conditioned to require a public amenities plan and the return of the golf course design for Planning Commission review within one year of approval. She indicated that the Director of Parks & Recreation has reviewed and is in agreement with the trails' plan for the project. Mr. Michael Mohler returned to the podium to provide infor- mation about buffering, grading and vegetation. He related his support of a biologist on-site during rough grading and briefly commented on the Biological Resources Protection Plan. The Commission agreed that: the biological resource areas along the bluff should be fenced off; the project would provide for all of the requirements enumerated in the Coastal Specific Plan; vegetation should be natural, with the goal of being site specific to the extent feasible; the mitigation monitoring measures in the Environmental Impact Report are sufficient to reduce impact and replace habitat that cannot be maintained as open space; and the updated biological report did not provide any substantial new information. Possible difficulties pertaining to the close proximity of Silent Flyers' aircraft and the golf course were noted. Environmental Impact Retort No. 36 MOTION: Commissioner Hayes moved to adopt P. C. Resolution No. 92-23, recommending certification of Environmental Impact Report No. 36, including the Statement of Overriding Considera- tions for those impacts which cannot be reduced to a level of in- significance. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mowlds and passed by the following unanimous roll call vote: March 31, 1992 7 AYES: COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO, CLARK, HAYES, MOWLDS AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN• COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT: COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. Acting Director Petru confirmed that a Final Environmental Impact Report will be prepared to address comments received during the circulation period of the Draft and Supplemental En- vironmental Impact Reports. Associate Planner Silverman pointed out that, contrary to information in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, there are seven impacts which cannot be reduced to a level of insig- nificance, even after mitigation. P.C. Resolution No. 92-24 Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 and Parcel Map No. 23004, and Related Conditions of Approval Commissioner Mowlds voiced his continued concern that coas- tal bluff road requirements called out in the Coastal Specific Plan (Policy No. 19, Page 57-13) of the Coastal Specific Plan would not be provided by the project as it is currently proposed. The Commission agreed that the resolution should include a find- ing that there is an overriding conflict with providing a coastal bluff road due to the need to cross Forrestal Canyon. The Commission agreed that the Conditions of Approval should be amended to include: information pertaining to the Biological Resources Protection Plan, that information about the maintenance district shall be included in the Development of Real Estate Report and the CC&Rs; that all streets shall have a vertical type curb and the applicant may request a rolled type curb subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works; and that the inter- section of Palos Verdes Drive South and Forrestal Drive shall be designed in such a manner to accommodate future signalization; Other minor modifications were made to the Conditions of Ap- proval. March 31, 1992 8 There was extensive discussion with regard to the realign- ment of Palos Verdes Drive South, including whether land north of Palos Verdes Drive South between Palos Verdes Drive East and Seacliff Drive should be utilized as a traffic turn out and whether the number of traffic lanes on Palos Verdes Drive South should be increased. Mr. Michael Mohler came forward again to relate the applicant's viewpoint that additional lanes along Palos Verdes Drive South could result in traffic conflicts and that such an expansion would be unwarranted. The following motions were then offered. MOTION: Chairman Katherman moved that the northern portion of the Palos Verdes Drive South right-of-way that would be aban- doned due to the road re -alignment between Palos Verdes Drive East and Seacliff Drive be used as an overlook with an ap- propriate number of parking spaces for westbound traffic. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mowlds and, there being no objection, it was so ordered by the Chair. MOTION. Commissioner Alberio moved that the Conditions of Approval be amended to require the applicant to improve Palos Verdes Drive South between Palos Verdes Drive East and Seacliff Drive to a four -lane highway with two lanes in each direction. The motion died for lack of a second. There was a consensus of the Commission that the project does not provide a nexus to require the developer to improve Palos Verdes Drive South to four lanes and that retaining Palos Verdes Drive South as a two-lane highway preserves its character. Acting Director Petru stated staff's understanding that the traf- fic generated by the project would not significantly impact Palos Verdes Drive South. The weekend congestion on Palos Verdes Drive South was noted by the Commission. MOTION: Commissioner Alberio moved that the Conditions of Approval be amended to require the applicant to improve eastbound Palos Verdes Drive South to two lanes. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Clark and defeated by the following 2-3 roll call vote: March 31, 1992 9 AYES' COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO AND CLARK. NOES. COMMISSIONERS HAYES, MOWLDS AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT: COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. Acting Director Petru provided clarification concerning trails. The following motion was then offered. MOTION. Commissioner Alberio moved to adopt P.C. Resolution No. 92-24, recommending approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50666 and Parcel Map No. 23004, including Condi- tions of Approval, as amended. The motion was seconded by Com- missioner Hayes and passed by the following unanimous roll call vote. AYES: COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO, CLARK, HAYES, MOWLDS AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. NOES NONE. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. P.C. Resolution No. 25 , Tentative Tract Map No. 50667 and Parcel Map No. 20970 and Related Conditions of Approval The Commission agreed that the Conditions of Approval should be amended to include: information about the Biological Resources Protection Plan; that public parking at the parks and vista points shall be prohibited after dusk; and that all streets shall be vertical type curbs and the applicant may request a rolled type curb, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. Other minor modifications were made to the Conditions of Approval. MOTION: Commissioner Alberio moved to adopt P.C. Resolution No. 92-25, recommending approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 50667 and Parcel Map No. 20970, including Condi- tions of Approval, as amended. The motion was seconded by Com- missioner Clark and passed by the following unanimous roll call vote' March 31, 1992 10 • • AYES: COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO, CLARK, HAYES, MOWLDS AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT: COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. Conditional Use Permit No. 162, Coastal Permit No. 103 and Grading Permit No. 1541 Associate Planner Silverman confirmed that Conditional Use Permit No. 162 includes a two-year time limit which will run con- currently with the Vesting Tentative Tract Map time limit. She supplied clarification with regard to grading. Commissioner Mowlds related his objection to any off-site grading. Acting Director Petru explained that off-site grading may be necessary for trail connections. With regard to fencing, she indicated that the intent is to have open fencing abutting the golf course or street. The Commission agreed to amend the Conditions of Approval to include: information about the Biological Resources Protection Plan; that the re -seeding and re-establishment of natural plant species for all of the disturbed open space enhancement areas shall include site specific and non-invasive species to be reviewed by the Director of Environmental Services, the Project Biologist and interested parties; that areas of the site that are not to be disturbed during grading or construction or that are to be protected in accordance with the mitigation measures contained in Environmental Impact Report No. 36, its supplement or adden- dum, shall be fenced prior to construction, subject to the review and approval of the Director of Environmental Services; that five foot minimum and six foot maximum fences with ninety percent light and air shall be required in the rear yard setback areas with specific lot designations to be determined by staff; that the public amenities plan can be appealed to City Council; and that no minor or accessory structures shall be permitted within any required setback area except by Minor Exception Permit. Other minor modifications were made to the Conditions of Ap- proval. There was a somewhat lengthy discussion about setbacks. The idea of requiring setbacks coinciding with anticipated Develop- ment Code revisions was deliberated. March 31, 1992 Mr. Michael Mohler returned to the podium once again to express the applicant's concern that forty foot combined side yard setbacks as proposed by the Commission would result in an enormous down -scaling of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 50666. The following motions with regard to setbacks were then offered: MOTION: Commissioner Mowlds moved that the front yard set- backs shall vary from thirty (30) to forty (40) feet throughout the development, depending on the lot type. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hayes and passed by the following 3-2 majority roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CLARK, HAYES AND MOWLDS. NOES: COMMISSIONER ALBERIO AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT: COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. Commissioner Alberio and Chairman Katherman related their support of twenty-five to thirty-five foot minimum front yard setbacks, with the limitation that the twenty-five foot setback be limited to no more than one-third of the facade frontage. MOTION: Commissioner Mowlds moved that all single -story structures on an individual lot shall maintain a minimum interior side yard setback of fifteen (15) feet on one side with a minimum total of thirty (35) feet for both sides and that all two-story structures on an individual lot shall maintain a minimum interior side ,yard setback of fifteen (15) feet on one side with a minimum total of forty (40) feet for both sides, or thirty-three percent of the front yard width at the front yard setback, whichever is greater. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Clark and, there being no objection, it was so ordered by Chairman Kather- man. MOTION: Commissioner Mowlds moved that the minimum street side setback shall be twenty (20) feet. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hayes and, there being no objection, it was so ordered by Chairman Katherman. The Commission discussed the importance of the articulation of the first and second stories. March 31, 1992 12 MOTION' Commissioner Mowlds moved that the upper level of a structure shall be a minimum of twenty percent smaller than the footprint of the structure, including the garage. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hayes and, there being no objection, it was so ordered by Chairman Katherman. There being no further discussion, the following motion was offered: MOTION: Commissioner Mowlds moved to adopt P.C. Resolution No. 92-26, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 162, Coastal Permit No. 103 and Grading Permit No. 1541 as amended. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hayes and passed by the following unanimous roll call vote' AYES' COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO, CLARK, HAYES, MOWLDS AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. NOES' NONE. ABSTAIN. COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. At 11 50 PM there was a recess until 12 05 AM when the meet- ing reconvened in regular agenda order. Conditional Use Permit No. 163, Coastal Permit No. 103 and Grading Permit No. 1541 The Commission agreed to amend the Conditions of Approval to include. information about the Biological Resources Protection Plan, that deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 6.00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m Monday through Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday and that there shall be no 24 hour deliveries; that City residents shall be offered green fee discounts; that a priority allocation of tee times shall be reserved for City residents with a percentage of the prioritized tee times to be allocated for Long Point hotel guests, that the Subregion 7 golf club shall have some type of club arrangement for City residents with an up -front fee to be paid in exchange for a certain number of golf rounds per year; that the public amenities plan shall be appealable to City Council; that areas of the site that are not to be disturbed during grading or construc- tion or that are to be protected in accordance with the mitiga- tion measures contained in Environmental Impact Report No. 36, its supplement or addendum, shall be fenced during construction, March 31, 1992 13 subject to the approval of 'the Director of Environmental Services; that the re -seeding and re-establishment of natural plant species for all of the disturbed open space enhancement areas shall include site specific and non-invasive species to be reviewed by the Director of Environmental Services, and the Project Biologist; that fencing along the bluff top shall be of a suitable design; that all roof mounted mechanical equipment, vents or ducts shall be prohibited and that all other mechanical equipment shall be screened and/or covered as necessary to reduce their visibility from public rights-of-way or adjacent properties; that gates to the clubhouse parking lot shall be looked after dark; that at least one on-site security patrol guard shall be provided during evening operating hours; and that any accessory structures shall not exceed sixteen (16) feet in height. Other minor modifications were made to the Conditions of Approval. Acting Director Petru confirmed that the mitigation monitor- ing will continue until new plant material is established. She supplied input with regard to Quimby Funds. The Commission recommended that the Quimby Funds be used for passive habitat land purchases. There being no further discus- sion, the following motion was offered. MOTION: Commissioner Clark moved to adopt P.C. Resolution No. 92-27, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 163, Coastal Per- mit No. 103 and Grading Permit No. 1541. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Alberio and passed by the following unanimous roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS ALBERIO, CLARK, HAYES, MOWLDS AND CHAIRMAN KATHERMAN. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER BYRD. ABSENT: COMMISSIONER LORENZEN. VII. CONTINUED BUSINESS None. VIII. NEW BUSINESS None. March 31, 1992 14 IX. QUESTIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE o At this time, Chairman Katherman noted a letter from the Council of Homeowners asking for a sixty day extension for the review period of the Salvation Army Environmental Impact Report until June 16, 1992. There was a consensus of the Commis- sion to extend the review period of the Salvation Army Environ- mental Impact Report until May 16, 1992. o Ms. Lois Knight Larue, 3136 Barkentine Road, stated her objection that the public hearing for Subregion 7 and 8 was closed. Reading aloud from a section of the California Coastal Act, she voiced her impression that the public has a right to fully participate in decisions affecting coastal planning, con- servation and development. Ms. Larue expressed her understanding that it is illegal to limit topics of discussion at Planning Com- mission meetings and suggested that the Palos Verdes Scenic turn out on Hawthorne Boulevard near Vallon Drive read, "Rancho Palos Verdes Scenic Turn Out." Reading aloud from an ethics memo written some time ago by Councilman Ryan, Ms. Larue related her opinion that the City's financial difficulties are a result of excessive engineering costs. She questioned whether the City could adopt an ethics code covering both monetary and personal relationships with City contractors. The Commission strongly objected to insinuations Ms. Larue made concerning Commissioner dealings with Charles Abbott. The Commission explained that it is appropriate for Commissioners to meet with Charles Abbott, who is currently functioning as a City employee, to obtain professional advice. For the record, Commissioner Mowlds stated that he has never had conversations about Planning Commission matters with Charles Abbott other than in the Hesse Park Community Room or City Hall and that, had it not been for his efforts with Charles Abbott, there would not be a clubhouse in Subregions 7 and 8. Commis- sioner Mowlds pointed out that the Planning Commission has not agreed to limit topics of discussion, as mentioned earlier in this discussion by Ms. Larue. -t9tin_ oriaA.. ce�aun., -�.a, J�9.av4.. X. ADJOURNMENT At 12.50 AM the meeting was duly adjourned to April 15, 1992, 7:00 PM. March 31, 1992 15