PC MINS 199108190
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AUGUST 19, 1991
The meeting was called to order at 7:45 p.m. by Chairman Von
Hagen at Hesse Community Park, 29301 Hawthorne Boulevard.
PRESENT Commissioners Brooks, McNulty, Chairman Von Hagen
ABSENT Commissioners Hotchkiss, Katherman
Also present were Director of Environmental Services Robert
Benard, Senior Planner Carolynn Petru, Associate Planner Joel
Rojas, and Assistant Planner Donna Jerex.
COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman Von Hagen acknowledged receipt of numerous letters, most
concerning Subregions 7 and 8 as well as several with regard to
Windport. Director Benard distributed copies of communications
received before the meeting concerning Windport.
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. P.C. Resolution No. 91-38 approving Minor Exception Permit
No. 415 - Appeal located at 30412 Rhone Road
Commissioner McNulty moved approval of the Consent Calendar,
Commissioner Brooks seconded and the motion passed without
objection.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. EXTREME SLOPE PERMIT NO.
28; Joseph R. Johnson,
6405 Corsini Place.
permit application which will
B. DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EIR
FOR GRADING NO. 1390 OF
TENTATIVE TRACT NO
37885, SECOND REVISION;
J.M. Peters Co., n.w.
corner of Forrestal/
Pirate intersection.
Director Benard reported that
the applicant has requested
withdrawal of this application
as he is pursuing another
require renoticing.
that this hearing is to receive
the remedial grading. Comments
Associate Planner Joel Rojas
presented the Staff Report
regarding the request to
certify the Supplemental EIR
for remedial grading activity
involving a sum of 1.05
million cubic yards of grading
(cut and fill). He emphasized
public comments on the SEIR on
on the merits of the project
1
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
August 19, 1991
should be reserved for the public hearing tentatively scheduled
for September 24.
Referring to the Staff Report, Commissioner Brooks asked how the
geotechnical hazards can be mitigated to an insignificant level.
Mr. Rojas explained that when the initial SEIR was circulated
there were still some issues open regarding landslide impacts but
since then RSA, the City's consultants, have reviewed all
geotechnical reports prepared for the project and have approved
all reports with the incorporation of street design standards
which are listed as mitigation measures in the SEIR. With the
mitigation measures, the geotechnical hazards would be considered
insignificant.
Chairman Von Hagen opened the public hearing.
Bob Trapp, J.M. Peters Co., 3501 Jamboree #200, Newport Beach,
stated that rather than giving a formal presentation he would
prefer to respond to concerns raised, with the assistance of the
soils engineer, civil engineer and environmental planning
consultant. He requested that the hearing on the merits of the
project be held on September 10 rather than September 24.
Al Esser, 72 Crest Road East, Rolling Hills, presented a poster
showing rainy season views of the area. He raised concerns about
landslides caused by underground water on bentonite deposits. He
recommended implementation of a drainage system to control
surface runoff and an improved sewer system.
Bob Grahamer, 32427 Searaven Drive, commented that Ladera Linda
homeowners were not notified of the public hearing and expressed
concerns about the cumulative impact of grading for several
projects in a geologically unstable area. He suggested
consideration of land mass reduction and export of graded
materials in the interest of land stability.
Associate Planner Rojas replied that notices of the public
hearing were sent to the president of record of the Ladera Linda
Homeowners Association as well as other adjacent HOA's, all
residents who spoke on the subject at previous public hearings,
and all residents within 500 feet of the project boundaries.
Regarding exporting, Mr. Rojas said that the proposed project
does not involve off-site export of fill material but that the
SDEIR analyzes the off-site export as an alternative to the
proposed project in great detail so the options are still open
and it could be done.
2
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
August 19, 1991
Jan Smit, 3855 Pirate Drive, said he noticed repetition of the
same problems in projects since 1982. Chairman Von Hagen
reminded him that tonight's hearing was on the SEIR and
discussion of the merits of the project would be heard at a
future meeting.
Angelika Brinkmann-Buri, 1354 Stonewood Court, San Pedro, spoke
on behalf of the California Native Plant Society. She said the
revision of the Draft EIR offers more detailed mitigation
measures but still contains some contradictions. She felt that
more detailed mitigation measures are needed, especially
regarding buffer zones around rare and sensitive plants.
Commissioner Brooks moved to continue the public hearing to
September 10 because of the absence of two Commissioners. There
was no second.
Director Benard stated that the time period for receiving
comments on the EIR is set by the State. Public hearings are not
a requirement and the City encourages interested parties to
comment in writing. The document is still out for review and
comments may be submitted until September 4.
Commissioner McNulty moved to close the public hearing, Chairman
Von Hagen seconded and the motion passed 2-1 with Commissioner
Brooks dissenting.
Chairman Von Hagen declared the public hearing closed and stated
the hearing on the merits of the project would be held Sept. 24.
RECESS AND RECONVENE - A five-minute break was taken at 8:30 p.m.
C. ZONE CHANGE NO. 19, Senior Planner Carolynn Petru
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. presented the Staff Report
18947, GRADING NO. 1460; regarding the applicant's
Pollock and Capellino, request to permit a zone
end of Windport Drive. change and subdivision of the
site into four single family
residential lots. Staff's recommendation is to open the public
hearing on the project applications, accept public testimony and
consider the merits of the proposed project. The public hearing
was opened.
Tim Burrell, 4038 Exultant Drive, attorney for the applicants,
commented on the Staff Report. Regarding the zone change, he
pointed out that the density would be much lower than adjacent
properties. He felt that rather than changing the zoning on
3
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
August 19, 1991
portions of Lots 1 and 2 to OH, the applicant might offer a deed
restriction on certain upper parts of the property and give it to
the Land Conservancy or some other agency that would maintain it
as open space. The grading plan has been revised to more closely
follow the existing terrain. Mr. Burrell suggested that the
Conditions of Approval specify the drainage course improvements
to prevent erosion and percolation but allowing for growth of
natural habitat to reestablish itself. He said the applicants
will cooperate with what the community wants regarding trails.
He asked for time to respond to residents' concerns at the end of
the public testimony.
Keith Tucker of NorCal Engineering, the applicant's geotechnical
engineer, addressed Commissioner Brooks' question as to core
samples. He said the bedrock, which varies in depth on the site
from 51 to loot, was mapped and a stability analysis was done to
verify that the structures would be safe under the anticipated
loading conditions. He estimated that three or four core samples
hit bedrock.
Replying to Chairman Von Hagen, Mr. Tucker stated that caissons
have been used in this type of construction since about 1920 and
have been shown to be safe and effective. Holes are drilled with
a rotary auger, metal casings lowered behind them, and then the
auger is withdrawn. No pounding is involved and vibration is
minimized. Regarding settlement of the land around the house,
Mr. Tucker estimated no more than 111 to 211 where the thickest
fill is.
Mike Nichols of Landco Engineering, the applicant's civil
engineer, said that with regard to staff's recommendation that
part of Lots 1 and 2 be designated OH, it is better not to split
the zoning on a lot and the deed restriction would keep the lots
safe from any further development.
James Crowley, 6644 Locklenna, asserted there is not enough
information in the DEIR. He cited the need for additional facts
on the test borings, the setback line required by the City
geologists, the effect of the project on existing homes, and the
environmental impact of the proposed mitigation measures. He
pointed out several concerns raised in the DEIR and others in a
letter from the California Water Service and asked for a written
response that fully answers all the concerns. Ms. Petru said
that Mr. Crowley's comments have been submitted in writing and
therefore will be addressed by the EIR consultant in the final
EIR.
4
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
August 19, 1991
Jim Moore, 6810 Locklenna, stated he is a registered mechanical
engineer and is concerned about the fill used in the area. He
said that Vernon Taylor, who developed the homes in the Windport
portion of the property, used the property as a dump site to
dispose of huge rocks and construction materials. He recommended
the use of mud rather than water when drilling. He contended
that caissons are good for supporting vertical loads but not
lateral loads, offer no resistance and can easily be sheared. He
said there needs to be an overviewer or reviewer to provide
control of the entire project.
Jaime Oaxaca, 6658 Locklenna, said his sidewalk has developed
cracks on the Windport side since the trucks have been going in,
and his backyard slope is settling. He cited the need to talk
about liability insurance, bonding, and lateral support around
the houses, and objected to Chairman Von Hagen's financial
relationship with the applicants. The Chairman stated that the
City Attorney has declared there is no conflict of interest.
Don Vannorsdall, 29513 Windport Drive, stated that Windport Drive
is slipping and that his house developed cracks after a hole was
bored about 20 feet from his property line. He referred to a
letter he wrote to the applicants demanding provision of lateral
support to protect his property and complained that the EIR does
not address the effect of drilling on the surrounding property,
the impact on the peace and quiet of the community, and potential
danger to residents.
Commissioner Brooks moved to continue the public hearing.
Discussing the time constraints, Director Benard advised that no
action can be taken on the project until the final EIR is issued
and reviewed, so it cannot come back to the Commission before
September 24. The time period for written comments on the Draft
EIR expired August 9, so any communications received after that
will not be addressed in the EIR. The report of the applicant's
geologist was accepted by RSA, the City geologists, last
December.
Chairman Von Hagen asked if NorCalls geology report considered
the issue of lateral stress on the caissons. Mr. Tucker replied
in the affirmative, providing figures on lateral resistance and
compression capacity. Asked about the borings, Mr. Tucker said
that 11 were placed and five hit bedrock, the two deepest ones
hitting between 38-48 feet in depth. He said that either water
or mud could be used in the drilling, but when mud is used some
may come out downstream which can be a problem in environmentally
sensitive areas.
5
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
August 19, 1991
Robert Baker, 7 Ocean Crest Court, asked about the holes drilled
in 1988 and Mr. Tucker responded that the purpose was to compare
estimated and actual depths with earlier topographic maps.
Responding to a question from Commissioner Brooks about the
letter from the California Water Service, Mr. Burrell said there
had been a misunderstanding which is now cleared up, and there
will be water service to the property.
Regarding posting a bond of indemnification, Mr. Burrell said it
would be more appropriate to have the surrounding houses
surveyed, documented and reviewed by competent geological firms.
This should raise the level of care used by all participants
because if a problem is caused by a contractor's negligence he
will have to pay for it.
Commissioner Brooks restated her motion to continue the public
hearing to September 24 when all Planning Commissioners are
expected to be present. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
McNulty and passed 3-0.
The current zoning and zoning options were discussed. chairman
Von Hagen stated he feels that a subdivision into four lots is
appropriate for this property.
Commissioner McNulty moved that staff prepare a resolution for
this project to be a four -lot subdivision zoned RS -2. Chairman
Von Hagen seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
Commissioner Brooks suggested that the City geologist be present
at the meeting of September 24 to address the issues raised, and
Mr. Benard said he would so request.
Senior Planner Petru said at the next meeting additional view
analysis and Trails Committee recommendations will be presented.
Commissioners indicated they liked the concept of controlled
drainage and a deed restriction or zoning designation preserving
certain property ds open space. They also agreed the applicant
should strive for balanced cut and fill.
Time constraints were discussed, with Mr. Burrell asking that the
next hearing be held on September 10, since the time limit for
the project runs out on September 25 and the applicants are not
willing to ask for an extension of time.
Chairman Von Hagen moved to reconsider the date for continuance
of the public hearing, Commissioner McNulty seconded and the
motion passed 2-1, with Commissioner Brooks dissenting.
P
E
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
August 19, 1991
Chairman Von Hagen moved that the hearing be continued to 6:00
p.m. on September 10, Commissioner McNulty seconded and the
motion passed 2-1. commissioner Brooks dissented on the basis
that there are too many other important matters to consider on
that agenda.
CONTINUED BUSINESS - None.
NEW BUSINESS - None.
QUESTIONS FROM AUDIENCE - None.
REPORTS
A. STAFF
Director Benard reported that the City Council has not
responded to his suggested tour of Subregion 7. Chairman Von
Hagen and Commissioner Brooks indicated they are available for
the tour either on the morning of August 21 or anytime on August
22.
B. COMMISSION
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:35 p.m. to August 27, 1991 at
6:30 p.m.
7