Loading...
PC MINS 19770421M I N U T E S City of Rancho Palos Verdes Planning Commission Special Adjourned Meeting April 21, 1977 The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 30942 Hawthorne Boulevard, by Chairperson McTaggart. PRESENT: Bacharach, Blue, Hughes, Rosenberg, McTaggart ABSENT: None Also present were Director of Planning Sharon Hightower and Associate Planner Larry Davis. Mr. McTaggart announced that the Environmental Committee would be having another hearing on the environmental impact report of the Coastal Plan on April 27 at 7:30 p.m. and that anyone with input on the environmental as- pects should attend that meeting. Director Hightower distributed to the Commissioners a package containing material on policy.,. General Plan amendment and Code amendment proposals for consideration at a work session. COASTAL SPECIFIC PLAN The public hearing was re -opened. Penny Miller, 29112 Firthridge, repre- senting the Palos Verdes Peninsula League of Women Voters, expressed the concerns of the League and submit- ted to the staff the letter which she read to the Commission. The con- cerns expressed by the League were re protecting marine resources, main- taining coastal agricultural land, preserving the visual qualities of coastal view -sheds, protecting the aesthetic qualities, avoiding hazards, having coastal recreation consistent with natural resources, and provid- ing adequate public access to coastal areas. She further said the League was concerned about the increases in density, particularly those proposed for Subregion #1 and #7, and the ambiguities on the map on page N-38, what was meant by "marginally stable", and felt the City should actively consider more ways to obtain open space such as requiring dedication of open space land. Mrs. Bacharach said as President of the League, a procedure has been es- tablished whereby she had nothing to do with the statement made tonight and will have nothing to do with any statements in the future to be pre- sented to the City. Mr. McTaggart announced that there will be work sessions on the Coastal Plan following this hearing and that before any recommendations are made to the Council, the Commission will review everything thoroughly. Barbara Gleghorn, 28850 Crestridge, said she had specific comments from people who were unable to attend the hearing, as follows: Dorian Dunlavey urged the Commission to take into consideration the preservation of a reasonable amount of agriculture in Subregion V. Janet and Ralph Porter were concerned with the traffic impact and felt it would be less if the density were one unit per acre or agricultural. Betty Field was very concerned with keeping the -density low along the coastline... Faye. -and Jim Kuhns felt the City must leave an area for fruit and flowers. Another woman (not named) felt perhaps it would be necessary to reactivate "Save Our Coastline". P.C. MINUTES 4/21/77 Mrs. Gleghorn suggested a way for agricultural use to remain would be to create a residential -agricultural planned development in Subregion V, with the homes on one unit per acre lots and the agricultural land on a commonly -owned lot. She suggested consulting the present farmers of the region re this. Scotty Wuerker said she was also thinking in long range terms re agricul- ture by looking at the food shortage. Lester Whalley, 1212 West Gardena Boulevard, Gardena, representing people interested in purchasing some -coastal property, said a great deal of the coastal land has a very shallow top soil and, therefore, limited growth potential. He said the tax rate would -have to be lowered on the property in order for farming to be feasible, and that the City would have prob- lems with an agricultural Program and with low density due to the tax rate. He said there is a shortage of homes and that with the water shortage, it is difficult to maintain the landscaping on large lots. He suggested having planned development areas instead, as some of these pro- perties will not be easy to develop. Re trails, he felt the City would be creating liability by develping an attractive nuisance. He felt ac- cess should be provided to the ocean, but it was too dangerous to have trails along the bluff. Dodie Burkhart said she lives across from the bluff and has pictures of all the people who now use the area, and that no one has ever fallen over. Frank Nargin, South Pasadena, said people with large lots do not maintain the entire area any more, just the area right around the home. He sug- gested a planned community development to provide the City with complete control over all pro3ects. He said people with large lots in Covina and other areas are now requesting lot splits because of the maintenance problems and the taxes. Ray Scallobrino felt the coastline should be maintained in the most natural way possible. Ms. Gleghorn said she lives in an area with lots 1/2 to 1 acre in size and where horses are allowed. She said the lots are not covered with weeds and that people are using low -maintenance types of planting because of the water shortage. Mr. Whalley said the property is always taxed based on the best and high- est use. He said it appears that the people up on the hill are interested in preserving the open space of the land below in order to enjoy their view at the expense of the property owners of the land below who are pay- ing high taxes for their property. He felt there should be some balance. Tom Johnson, Palos Verdes Estates, owner of property on Via Campesina, said he was very interested in maintaining the rural atmosphere with one unit per acre lots. Re the Berry property, he said he would develop with a minimum number of units. Barbara Hein felt access roads should be built only in areas which are currently not developed, not in areas which are now developed. Re re- source management, she said at the time the General Plan was adopted, the County had developed the concept of coastal resource management, and that this could be used as a protection in terms of zoning. She said she had written material on file from the County re this. Mr. McTaggart requested a copy of the information she has, and she agreed to submit it. Ralph Jester asked if architectural control has been considered. Mr. McTaggart said except for the Miraleste area which is controlled by the Palos Verdes Estates Art Jury, the only architectural control in the City is through the homeowners associations. Mr. Jester said he would recommend it for the City as low density does not necessarily provide an aesthetically pleasing development, and that guidance is important. He suggested a study be undertaken of the pros and cons of architectural control. He agreed to help in any way he could. P.C. MINUTES -2- 4/21/77 In response to Commission questions, Director Hightower said she was quite familiar with architectural review boards and that many cities have them. She said if the Commission wished to recommend this, it should be a city-wide regulation; not 3ust part of this coastal plan; that the board can be formed without an election, as the members are appointed by the Council as with any other commission. She said some cities require experts on the commission, others require only lay people, and others require some of both. Mr. McTaggart suggested discussing this at a work session. George Shaw, 28101 Lobrook, asked how the elaborate guidelines on U-66 would be implemented. Mr. Davis said those guidelines were very much like the criteria in the grading ordinance, that they are just guidelines and all do not have to be met. Mr. Jester said Palos Verdes Estates has regulations which could be used as guidelines. Tim Burrell, 4038 Exultant, representing the Seaview Residenta Associa- tion, of which he is president, said 1) re Subregion #6 and #7, the As- sociation,was more concerned with design criteria rather than density, and would like to see the preservation of a vista and maintenance of an open effect rather than a solid wall of homes along the roadway; 2) re Palos Verdes Drive South and street improvements, there are service roads providing access to both sides of the street right now; 3) re access to the bluffs and ocean, the Association is in favor of the coastal bluff trail and removing the existing fences; 4) re future development of the Portuguese Bend area, that beach utilization be limited because of the access problems. Mr. McTaggart told Mr. Burrell that if he receives any more input from the Homeowners Association to inform the.Commission. Public hearing was closed. RECESS At 9:00 p.m. a brief recess was called. The meeting reconvened at 9:15 p.m. with the same members present. FUTURE MEETINGS The Commission and staff discussed the work session schedule and the fol- lowing schedule was agreed --upon: Coastal Specific Plan work sessions were scheduled for April 28 and May 5 and if the Commission has not completed its study at the meeting of the 5th of May, an additional work session might be set for May 12; a work session on tree trimming, grading, antenna, and code amendments was set for May 19; a hearing for the Antenna Ordinance was set for May 31. Mr. McTaggart said the Council still wished to schedule a joint meeting. He suggested a Monday evening during a week when there was no regular Planning Commission meeting. He said if anyone has any items to place on that agenda to please let him know, and that one item already scheduled is legal representation for the Planning Commission at certain hearings. Mr. Blue suggested legal representation specializing in land use as an item, and said perhaps the City Attorney could recommend a consultant. Re.the Short Course for Planning Commissioners meeting in San Francisco on June 2 and 3, Director Hightower said there was money available in the budget for the Commissioners to attend this, and that those inter- ested in attending and in having the City handle the reservations, etc., should informthe staff. All of the Commissioners indicated they would like to attend, but Mr. Rosenberg was not sure he would be able to. Mr. McTaggart asked that staff make his reservations, Mr. Rosenberg said not to pre -register him, and the others said they would call staff. P.C. MINUTES -3- 4/21/77 • �l Director Hightower reminded the Commission to hold onto the material dis- tributed to them tonight, as they will be discussing the issues at the May 19 work session. HOMEOWNERS MEETING Mr. McTaggart said at a meeting the previous evening with presidents of homeowners associations, it was de- cided to develop an organization to better represent the homeowners to the City, and that-Lif everyone agrees, he has volunteered to be the------. liaison. He said they further requested that all information they re- ceive from the City be dated (re draft code amendments, etc.). ADJOURNMENT At 9:45 p.m. it was moved, seconded, and carried, to adjourn to Tuesday, April 26, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. P.C. MINUTES -4- 4/21/77