PC RES 2014-014 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO PALOS VERDES CONDITIONALLY APPROVING, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION, MAJOR GRADING PERMIT
AND MINOR EXCEPTION PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
NEW 7,632FT2 SPLIT-STORY RESIDENCE, A 837FT2 DETACHED
GARAGE, 1,995YD3 OF RELATED GRADING, RETAINING WALLS UP
TO 16,5' IN HEIGHT AND 6' TALL ENTRY FENCING/GATES WITHIN
THE FRONT YARD SETBACK OF A VACANT PROPERTY AT 2902
VISTA DEL MAR.
WHEREAS, on July 12, 1977, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use
Permit No. 23, establishing a residential planned development (RPD) comprising of Tract Nos.
32574, 32991 and 34834; and,
WHEREAS, on September 9, 1986, the Planning Commission adopted the Seacliff Hills
Development Guidelines in recognition of the need for greater sensitivity and design flexibility in
the construction of these custom homes. The Guidelines were supplemented on August 23,
1989; and,
WHEREAS, on November 25, 2008, the Planning Commission adopted P.C. Resolution
No. 2008-48, approving a tract amendment for the adjustment of a "Restricted Use Area" and a
Conditional Use Permit Revision (CUP) and Grading Permit (GR) for a new 9,225ft2, two-story,
single-family residence with 2,000yd3 of grading for the property located at 2902 Vista Del Mar;
and,
WHEREAS, the applicant (Mr. DiDominicantonio) submitted plans for plan check review,
which expired on November 2010 due to inactivity; and,
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2013, a different property owner with the same previous
architect (AGA Design Group representing Jia Zhang) submitted a new CUP Revision, GR and
MEP applications, requesting approval for a new 10,656ft2, two-story, single-family residence,
852ft2 detached garage, 178ft2 detached pool restroom, a swimming pool, construction of walls
and entry gate with 5,312yd3 of related grading for the subject property; and,
WHEREAS, on November 12, 2013, the Planning Commission adopted P.C. Resolution
No. 2013-25, denying, without prejudice, a CUP revision, GR, and Minor Exception Permit
(MEP) for a new 8,856ft2 split-story residence, 948ft2 detached garage, 178ft2 accessory
structure and 2,990yd3 of related grading for the property located at 2902 Vista Del Mar; and,
WHEREAS, the applicant submitted a timely appeal and appealed the Planning
Commission's decision to the City Council, requesting that a revised proposal be referred back
to the Planning Commission for review; and,
WHEREAS, on February 18, 2014, the City Council granted the appeal, thereby referring
the matter back to the Planning Commission for review with the direction that the project be
scaled down; and,
WHEREAS, a notice was published on March 6, 2014, pursuant to the requirements of
the Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code; and,
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 1 of 11
WHEREAS, on March 8, 2014, the Planning Commission granted the applicant's request
and continued the public hearing to April 8, 2014, allowing the applicant additional time to
address inconsistencies between the architectural and grading plans; and,
WHEREAS, on April 8, 2014, the Planning Commission granted the applicant's request
and continued the public hearing to April 22, 2014, allowing the applicant additional time to
further revise the plans; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act,
Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et. seq. ("CEQA"), the State's CEQA Guidelines,
California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq., the City's Local CEQA
Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65962.5(f) (Hazardous Waste and Substances
Statement), the Planning Commission found no evidence that Case No. ZON2013-00063 will
have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project has been
found to be categorically exempt under Class 3 (Section 15303); and,
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2014, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present
evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The proposed project is a request for the following:
A. 1,995yd3 of grading (565yd3 within the footprint and 1,430yd3 outside of the footprint) and
retaining walls up to 16.5' in height;
B. Construction of a new 7,407ft2 split-story residence (3,319ft2 upper floor, 4,088ft2 lower
floor and a 225ft2 utility room below grade) and a detached 837ft2 three-car garage;
C. Installation of 6' tall entry gates/fencing within the front yard setback, where the Code
restricts the height to 3.5' maximum.
Section 2: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit Revision is warranted because:
A. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and for all of
the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping and other features required by this title
or by conditions imposed under this section to integrate said use with those on adjacent
land and within the neighborhood. More specifically, pursuant to CUP 23, this lot was
originally approved for a 4,000ft2, multi-level single-family residence resulting in 9.5% lot
coverage. In 2008, the Planning Commission granted a CUP revision, approving a
8,369ft2 two-story residence, a 836ft2 detached garage and swimming pool, resulting in
28% lot coverage (30% max. allowed). The pending request is for a smaller 7,407ft2
split-story home, an 837ft2 detached garage, resulting in a lot coverage of 31.8%. While
the maximum allowed lot coverage for a downslope lot is 30%, deviations were granted
to four of the seven existing neighboring properties, allowing lot coverage to be
exceeded by 4% to 13%. Lot coverage accounts for any area altered not returned to its
existing condition. The excess in lot coverage is primarily due to the re-contouring of the
rear slope. The re-contouring of the rear slope will blend in the proposed improvements
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 2 of 11
with the remaining hillside while minimizing the need for additional retaining walls and
therefore the 1.8%excess in lot coverage is minimal.
B. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways sufficient to carry the type
and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. More specifically, the subject
property is served by an existing public street (Vista Del Mar) that serves all eleven lots
and connects to Palos Verdes Drive East. The proposed project will not alter the nature
of traffic generated by the lot as compared to the originally-approved residence.
C. In approving the subject use at the specific location, there will be no significant adverse
effect on adjacent property or the permitted use thereof. More specifically, the subject
property is located adjacent to the City-owned "San Ramon Ecological Reserve"
(formerly referred to as the "switchback" parcel) that is part of the City's greater Palos
Verdes Nature (NCCP) preserve. The applicant prepared a biological survey of the site
to identify the presence of any existing sensitive plant or animal species, and to
determine if the project would have direct or indirect effects upon habitat areas within the
NCCP preserve. The biological survey found that the project would result in no direct or
indirect impacts to habitat on site or in the adjacent NCCP preserve.
D. The proposed use is not contrary to the General Plan. More specifically, the General
Plan land use designation for the subject property is Residential, <1 du/acre. The
development and improvement of single-family residences are among the primary
permitted uses within this land use designation. This is also reflected in Housing Activity
Policy No. 3 of the General Plan (p. 78), which calls upon the City to "[encourage] and
assist in the maintenance and improvement of all existing residential neighborhoods so
as to maintain optimum local standards of housing quality and design."
E. The proposed use complies with all applicable requirements of the overlay control
districts. More specifically, the subject property and all other properties on Vista Del Mar
are subject to the Natural (OC-1) and Urban Appearance (OC-3) overlay control districts.
More specifically, with the exception of lot coverage, the project will not propose any
activities that are contrary to the provisions of the OC-1 District. The OC-1 performance
criteria recommend no more than 10% coverage, while CUP 23 allows 30% coverage on
downslope lots such as the subject property, and the project proposes 31.8% coverage.
None of the existing properties in the immediate neighborhood are consistent with this
performance criterion and four of the seven existing developments were granted
approval to increase the allowed lot coverage. The excess in lot coverage is primarily to
re-contour the rear slope area to blend in the proposed development with the remainder
of the hillside. Additionally, all proposed improvements will be tucked into the existing
slope and located substantially lower than the street level (Vista Del Mar). As such, no
major views, vistas or viewsheds identified in the General Plan would be impacted by the
proposed project since none of the improvements will be visible from the street of access
and ancillary retaining walls will be adequately screened from Palos Verdes Drive South
and therefore consistent with OC-3 District.
F. Conditions regarding any of the requirements listed above which the Planning
Commission finds to be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare,
have been imposed in the attached Exhibit A.
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 3 of 11
Section 2: Approval of a Major Grading Permit is warranted because:
A. The grading does not exceed that which is necessary for the permitted primary use of
the lot. The primary use of the subject lot is residential as identified in the City's General
Plan and Zoning map. The proposed grading is to accommodate the development of a
new single-family residence, accessory structures and vehicle access. More specifically,
the grading will allow for the proposed development to be built into the descending
hillside that steps with the topography of the parcel. Additionally, the proposed grading
will allow for the proposed improvements to be located substantially lower than the street
of access, most of which will not be readily visible.
B. The proposed grading and/or related construction does not significantly adversely affect
the visual relationships with, nor the views from the viewing area of neighboring
properties. The proposed grading is for a new residence within the City's permitted
height requirements of 16730'. Additionally, the new residence and garage will be
tucked into the existing slope, thereby, lowering the building footprint. The ridgeline of
the detached garage will be approximately 6.9' above the existing grade and 1.6' below
the street elevation, while the ridgeline of the residence will be 14.5' above the existing
grade and 13.5' below the street elevation, given the down sloping topography of the
site. As a result, no improvements will be visible from Vista Del Mar and will not
significantly affect views from neighboring properties.
C. The nature of the grading minimizes disturbance to the natural contours and finished
contours are reasonably natural. The existing "natural" contours of the project site are
largely the result of past grading for the development of the Seacliff Hills neighborhood
and the construction of the existing street by the developer, and past grading to
accommodate the Palos Verdes Drive East roadway below. The areas beyond the
retaining walls to accommodate the building footprints of the primary and accessory
structures and access from Vista Del Mar will not be altered. However, a portion of the
descending slope in the rear yard will be re-contoured to blend it with the new structure
and minimize the need for retaining walls facing PVDS. As a result of the re-contouring,
the hill-side appearance will be maintained.
D. The grading takes into account the preservation of natural topographic features and
appearances by means of land sculpturing so as to blend any man-made or
manufactured slope into the natural topography. The existing "natural" contours of the
project site are largely the result of tract grading in the past. There are no significant
natural topographic features that would be disturbed by the proposed grading.
E. The grading and/or related construction is compatible with the immediate neighborhood
character. More specifically, the immediate neighborhood is comprised of 2- and 3-story
split-level residences, ranging in size from 5,286ft2 to 7,875ft2, with an average structure
size of 6,751ft2. The proposed 8,469ft2, 2-story split-level residence (including the
garage) will not be readily apparent from the public street or neighboring properties, as
the proposed improvement will be tucked into the descending slope, substantially lower
than the street elevation and within the by-right height envelope of 16730'. Additionally,
the small utility room will be entirely below grade and will not be visible from any
surrounding private or public properties and right-of-ways. Also, the proposed fagades
incorporate a variety of finish materials and elements that enhance the general
articulation of the facades and further reduce their apparent bulk and mass.
Furthermore, since the existing neighborhood comprises homes exhibiting a wide range
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 4 of 11
of contemporary architectural styles and exterior finishes, with no single predominant
style, any architectural style would blend in with the neighborhood and would not appear
out of character. Therefore, the proposed style of the residence contributes positively to
the diversity of styles in the immediate neighborhood. Moreover, the proposed setbacks
and open space is consistent with the existing pattern of development in the
neighborhood.
F. The grading is not within a new residential tract, as it was established in 1977.
G. The grading utilizes street designs and improvements which serve to minimize grading
alternatives and harmonize with the natural contours and character of the hillside
because no modifications are proposed to streets or other public infrastructure.
H. The grading would not cause excessive and unnecessary disturbance of the natural
landscape or wildlife habitat through removal of vegetation because there are none on
the property.
I. The grading conforms to grading standards related to maximum finished slopes,
restricted grading areas and driveways. Deviations to maximum depth of cut or fill in
excess of 5' are warranted given the existing topography of the site. More specifically,
the existing hillside is a result of the original tract grading and to place improvements
within the slope to lower the finished grade elevation helps eliminate any potential for
view impairment from the viewing areas of other properties and screens the entire
structure from Vista Del Mar. Additionally, re-contouring the rear slope area minimizes
the need for additional retaining walls facing Palos Verdes Drive South, while
maintaining the hillside character. Furthermore, similar deviations were granted for
neighboring properties with similar topographical configurations for the development of
their sites.
J. Deviations to maximum heights of retaining walls are warranted as they are necessary to
accommodate the primary and ancillary residential development and access below
existing grade, similar to what was allowed for the development of neighboring
topographically comparable properties. Without the proposed retaining walls, the
proposed improvements would be set higher on the property, which would make it
readily visible and potentially impair views. Since the proposed improvements will be
tucked into the slope and the retaining walls will hold up the slope around the perimeter
of said improvements, the retaining walls will primarily only be visible to the occupants of
the property. The portions visible from the abutting neighbor's property and the public
right-of-way will be adequately screened with landscaping.
Section 3: Approval of a Minor Exception Permit is warranted by practical difficulties.
An entry gate/fencing along the front property line is necessary to adequately secure the site
and protect the public from accessing the property. Normally on a flat lot, a 3.5' barrier may
visually deter the public from accessing the property and there is no safety hazard if one
decides to hop over the fence. However, the subject lot descends from the street all the way
down the lot. Additionally, three other properties (2950, 2923, 2903 Vista Del Mar) were
granted approvals for similar barriers in the front yard for the same reasons.
Section 4: Any interested person aggrieved by this decision or any portion of this
decision may appeal to the City Council. The appeal shall set forth the grounds for appeal and
any specific action being requested by the appellant. Any appeal letter must be filed within
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 5 of 11
fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of this decision, or by 5:30 PM on Wednesday, May 7,
2014. A $2,275.00 appeal fee must accompany any appeal letter. If no appeal is filed timely,
the Planning Commission's decision will be final at 5:30 PM on May 7, 2014.
Section 5: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information and findings
included in the Staff Report, Minutes and other records of proceedings, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby conditionally approves, a Conditional
Use Permit Revision, Major Grading Permit and Minor Exception Permit applications for the
property located at 2902 Vista Del Mar (Case No. ZON2013-00063).
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22"d day of April 2014, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissiondrs Cruikshank, Emenhiser, Gerstner, James, Vice Chairman Nelson,
Chairman Leon
NOES: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
RECUSALS: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Tomblin
Gordon Leon
Chairman
Joel RoAAMCP
Comm nity Develo nt Director; and,
Secreta f the Planning Commission
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 6 of 11
Exhibit "A"
Conditions of Approval
Case No. ZON2013-00063 (2902 Vista Del Mar)
General Conditions:
1. Prior to the submittal of plans into Building and Safety plan check, the applicant and the
property owner shall submit to the City a statement, in writing, that they have read,
understand, and agree to all conditions of approval contained in this Resolution. Failure
to provide said written statement within ninety (90) days following the date of this
approval shall render this approval null and void.
2. Prior to conducting any work in the public right of way, such as for curb cuts, dumpsters,
temporary improvements and/or permanent improvements, the applicant shall obtain an
encroachment permit from the Director of Public Works.
3. Approval of this permit shall not be construed as a waiver of applicable and appropriate
zoning regulations, or any Federal, State, County and/or City laws and regulations.
Unless otherwise expressly specified, all other requirements of the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes Municipal Code shall apply.
4. The Community Development Director is authorized to make minor modifications to the
approved plans and any of the conditions of approval if such modifications will achieve
substantially the same results as would strict compliance with the approved plans and
conditions. Otherwise, any substantive change to the project shall require approval of a
revision by the final body that approved the original project, which may require new and
separate environmental review.
5. The project development on the site shall conform to the specific standards contained in
these conditions of approval or, if not addressed herein, shall conform to the RS-1
residential development standards and the OC-1/OC-3 overlay control district
performance criteria of the City's Municipal Code and the Seacliff Hills Development
guidelines.
6. Failure to comply with and adhere to all of these conditions of approval may be cause to
revoke the approval of the project pursuant to the revocation procedures contained in
Section 17.86.060 of the City's Municipal Code.
7. If the applicant has not submitted an application for a building permit for the approved
project or not commenced the approved project as described in Section 17.86.070 of the
City's Municipal Code within one year of the final effective date of this Resolution,
approval of the project shall expire and be of no further effect unless, prior to expiration,
a written request for extension is filed with the Community Development Department and
approved by the Director.
8. In the event that any of these conditions conflict with the recommendations and/or
requirements of another permitting agency or City department, the stricter standard shall
apply.
9. The construction site and adjacent public and private properties and streets shall be kept
free of all loose materials resembling trash and debris in excess of that material used for
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 7 of 11
immediate construction purposes. Such excess material may include, but not be limited
to: the accumulation of debris, garbage, lumber, scrap metal, concrete asphalt, piles of
earth, salvage materials, abandoned or discarded furniture, appliances or other
household fixtures.
10. Permitted hours and days for construction activity are 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday
through Friday, 9:OOAM to 5:OOPM on Saturday, with no construction activity permitted
on Sundays or on the legal holidays specified in Section 17.96.920 of the Rancho Palos
Verdes Development Code. During demolition, construction and/or grading operations,
trucks shall not park, queue and/or idle at the project site or in the adjoining street rights-
of-way before 7AM Monday through Friday and before 9AM on Saturday, in accordance
with the permitted hours of construction stated in this condition. When feasible to do so,
the construction contractor shall provide staging areas on-site to minimize off-site
transportation of heavy construction equipment. These areas shall be located to
maximize the distance between staging activities and neighboring properties, subject to
approval by the building official.
11. All grading, landscaping and construction activities shall exercise effective dust control
techniques, either through screening and/or watering.
12. All construction sites shall be maintained in a secure, safe, neat and orderly manner, to
the satisfaction of the City's Building Official. All construction waste and debris resulting
from a construction, alteration or repair project shall be removed on a weekly basis by
the contractor or property owner. Existing or temporary portable bathrooms shall be
provided during construction. Portable bathrooms shall be placed in a location that will
minimize disturbance to the surrounding property owners, to the satisfaction of the City's
Building Official.
13. Unless otherwise designated in these conditions, all construction shall be completed in
substantial conformance with the plans stamped APPROVED by the City with the effective
date of this Resolution.
Project Specific Conditions:
14. The approved new 7,632ft2 split-story residence consists of a 3,319ft2 upper floor,
4,088ft2 lower floor, 225ft2 below-grade utility room and an 837ft2 detached garage.
BUILDING AREA CERTIFICATION REQUIRED, to be provided by a licensed land
surveyor or civil engineer prior to building permit final.
15. Unless modified by the approval of future planning applications, the approved residence
shall maintain the following setbacks:
Front yard setback—25' average/20' minimum
Interior side yard setbacks— 10' minimum per side /25' minimal total of both sides
Rear yard setback—25' average/20' minimum
BUILDING SETBACK CERTIFICATION REQUIRED, to be provided by a licensed land
surveyor or civil engineer prior to foundation forms inspection.
16. The maximum ridgeline of the approved residence is 855'. BUILDING HEIGHT
CERTIFICATION REQUIRED, to be provided by a licensed land surveyor or civil
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 8 of 11
engineer prior to roof sheathing inspection. Additionally, prior to the framing of walls, a
FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION CERTIFICATION shall be provided by a licensed land
surveyor or civil engineer, showing the Finished Lower Floor Elevation at 826.5'.
The maximum ridgeline of the detached garage is 866.8' with the finished slab elevation
of 850.25'. RIDGEHEIGHT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING
PERMIT FINAL.
17. A minimum 3-car garage shall be provided and maintained, and a minimum of three
unenclosed parking spaces shall be provided and maintained. An enclosed parking
space shall have an unobstructed ground space of no less than 9' in width by 20' in
depth, with a minimum of 7' of vertical clearance over the space. An unenclosed parking
space shall have an unobstructed ground space of no less than 9' in width by 20' in
depth.
18. Unless modified by the approval of future planning applications, the approved project
shall maintain a maximum of 31.8% lot coverage.
19. Maximum hardscape coverage within the 20-foot front-yard setback area shall not
exceed 50%.
20. The approved grading is for 1,995yd3 of grading (565yd3 within the building footprint and
1,430yd3 outside of the building footprint) with retaining walls measuring up to 16.5' in
height. ROUGH AND FINAL GRADE CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO
BUILDING PERMIT FINAL.
21. The approved retaining walls include the following:
a. The outer sides of the retaining walls along both sides of the proposed driveway
follow the existing grade, while ranging in height up to 7.9' maximum, as
measured from the lowered driveway slab.
b. The outer side of the retaining wall in front of the residence that wraps around
along the east side of the residence measures approximately 1.5' to 7.5'
maximum above the existing grade while the inside of the same wall measures 8'
to 16.5' maximum along the structure. The outer side of this retaining wall facing
west to the abutting neighbor shall be adequately screened and maintained with
landscaping and included as part of the landscaping plan.
c. The outer side of the retaining wall along the west side of the residence facing an
existing abutting neighbor measures approximately 5' to 9.5' maximum, while the
inside of the same wall measures 3.8' to 16' maximum along the structure. The
outer side of this retaining wall facing east shall be adequately screened and
maintained with landscaping and included as part of the landscaping plan.
22. A landscaping plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community
Development Director prior to Building Permit issuance. The criteria for the landscaping
plan includes: screen buildings from PVDS; soften architectural features; improve
transition between open space and buildings; slope stabilization; and drought tolerant
plantings.
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 9 of 11
23. Haul routes to transport soil shall be approved by the Public Works Division.
24. Driveways shall be a minimum width of 10'. A paved 25' turning radius shall be provided
between the garage or other parking area and the street of access. Driveways shall take
into account the driveway standards required by the department of Public Works for
driveway entrances located in the public right-of-way. Maximum slope of the driveway
shall not exceed 20%.
25. An 18" wide landscaped area between the side property line and the driveway shall be
maintained.
26. New slopes shall not exceed 67% adjacent to the driveway and 35% elsewhere on the
property.
27. Exterior residential lighting shall be in compliance with the standards of Section
17.56.030 of the Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code. No outdoor lighting is
permitted where the light source is directed toward or results in direct illumination of a
parcel of property or properties other than that upon which such light source is physically
located.
28. The approved entry gate/fencing within the 20' front yard setback shall be allowed up to
6' in total height.
29. The proposed chimney may project a maximum of 2' into any required setback, and shall
not exceed the minimum height required for compliance with the Uniform Building Code.
30. All utility lines installed to service the building shall be placed underground from an
existing power pole or other point of connection off-site prior to certificate of occupancy.
31. Approval of NPDES and Geotechnical review is required PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A
GRADING OR BUILDING PERMIT from the Building & Safety Division.
32. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL, the property owner shall either submit a letter
from the Los Angeles County Fire Department indicating that no brush clearance is
necessary within the City-owned abutting Preserve property as a result of the new
residence or request the City to perform any brush clearance mandated by the Los
Angeles County Fire Department within the City's NCCP preserve area. The property
owner shall be responsible for the cost of the initial brush clearance and any subsequent
maintenance clearing performed by the City. In addition, prior to performing any initial
brush clearance in the Preserve, the subject property owner shall conduct a biological
survey to determine if there is any Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) or other special status
plans as defined by the City's NCCP, within the area that must be cleared. Since CSS is
the habitat of the federally listed California gnatcatcher, according to the City's NCCP,
any loss of CSS habitat resulting from the required brush clearance is required to be
mitigated at a 3:1 ratio. Such mitigation may be provided by actual re-vegetation and a
five-year maintenance plan to ensure the new habitat properly establishes, or by the
payment of a mitigation fee that is applied towards on-going CSS re-vegetation projects
undertaken by the City within the City's habitat preserve. The fee is based on a $25,000
per acre re-vegetation cost applied to the total amount of mitigation needed, as identified
in the City's NCCP.
P.C. Resolution No. 2014.-14
Page 10 of 11
33. Any future pool, spa, or pool equipment within the approved re-contoured/grading area
on the rear slope and a lift/elevator within the approved paved area between the motor
court and residence, shall not require a Conditional Use Permit revision. Instead, a Site
Plan Review application with applicable Grading Permits shall be applied at Staff or
Director level.
P.C. Resolution No. 2014-14
Page 11 of 11