PC RES 2013-017 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2013.17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO PALOS VERDES RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING RPVMC SECTION
17.76.100(G)(1) TO INCREASE PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF A CITY
TREE REVIEW PERMIT DECISION TO THE 20 CLOSEST
PROPERTIES; AMENDING RPVMC SECTION 17.76.100(0)(1) TO
CLARIFY THAT THE NOTIFIED PROPERTIES ARE TO BE
PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES; AND AMENDING RPVMC SECTION 17.76.100(0)(3) TO
REQUIRE THE CITY TO POST A NOTICE OF DECISION ON EACH
TREE SUBJECT TO PERMIT APPROVAL, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
POSTING NOTICES ON TREES LOCATED IN AREAS THAT ARE TOO
DIFFICULT OR HAZARDOUS TO ACCESS (CASE NO. ZON2013-
00239)
WHEREAS, Section 17.76.1 X10 of Title 17 of the Rancho Palos Verdes
Municipal Code (the "Municipal Code") sets forth various procedures and
regulations regarding City Tree Review Permits; and,
WHEREAS, on May 21, 2013, Mayor Brooks presented a request for the
City Council to initiate a code amendment to improve and expand public
notification for City Tree Review Permit (CTRP) decisions; and,
WHEREAS, on May 21, 2013, the City Council initiated a code
amendment to increase public notification for CTRP application decisions to
Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code Section 17.76.100 (City Tree Review
Permit); and,.
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2013, notice of a public hearing on the proposed
amendments to Section 17.76.100 of the Municipal Code was published in the
Palos Verdes Peninsula News; and,
WHEREAS, after notice was issued pursuant to the requirements of the
Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code, the Planning Commission held a duly
noticed public hearing on July 9, 2013, at which time Staff presented proposed
code amendments to RPVMC Section 17.76.100. Based upon the
recommendation of Staff, the Planning Commission moved to continue the public
hearing to July 23, 2013; and,
WHEREAS, on July 23, 2013, the Planning Commission held a public
hearing, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be
heard and present evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
P.C. Resolution No. 2013-17
Page 1 of 6
Section 1: That the amendments to Title 17 of the Municipal Code are
consistent with California Government Code Section 65853, zoning amendment
procedures.
Section 2: That the amendments to Title 17 are consistent with the
Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan and Coastal Specific Plan in that they
uphold, and do not hinder, the goals and policies of those plans. Specifically, the
revisions to Section 17.76.100 will expand public notification for permit decisions
where City trees significantly impair views from adjoining lots, which assists the
Community Development Department to implement and uphold the Goals and
policies of the City's General Plan.
Section 3: The Planning Commission further finds, based upon its own
independent review, that there is no substantial evidence that the amendments to
Title 17 would result in new significant environmental effects, or a substantial
increase in the severity of the effects, as previously identified the Negative
Declaration adopted in conjunction with Ordinance No. 510 for amendments to
Title 17 of the Municipal Code, because the new amendments merely expand or
clarify certain notification requirements and/or codify policies and procedures that
are currently in place. Accordingly, the Planning Commission hereby finds that
Addendum (No. 6) to the prior Negative Declaration, which is attached hereto as
Exhibit 'A" complies with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act.
Section 4: That the amendments to Chapter 17.76,100 are necessary
to preserve the public health, safety, and general welfare, as the proposed
amendments will increase noticing of City Tree Review Permit decisions, which
increases opportunities for property owners of Rancho Palos Verdes to adopt
and trim City trees, so as to preserve City trees that otherwise would be
removed.
Section 5: That the subsections listed below of Section 17.76.100 (City
Tree Review Permit) of Title 17 of the Municipal Code are hereby amended as
follows (strike-out text is for removed language, and bold and underlined text is
for new language):
17.76.100—City Tree Review Permit
G. Notification. When the director makes a determination regarding a City tree review
permit, written notice of the decision shall be given as follows:
1. When the foliage is located on a City street or easement, a notice of the
determination to grant the application shall be sent to the applicant(s), the
appropriate Homeowners Association, and the te-R twenty (4020) closest
adjacent properties within the City of Rancho Palos Verde;, including the
owner(s) of the property directly abutting or underlying the public right-of-way
where the subject tree(s) and/or foliage are located. Adjacent properties shall
include the te-R twenty (4-020) closest lots within the City of Rancho Palos
P.C. Resolution No. 2013-17
Page 2 of 6
Verdes, which are on the same street, directly abutting and adjacent to the
property where the tree and/or foliage are located. Notice of denial shall be
given only to the applicant.
2. When the foliage is located in a City park, notice of the director's decision shall
be given only to the applicant.
3. Notice of the permit determination to grant the application shall be posted
by City Staff on a conspicuous-location on each tree that is subject of an
application decision. For trees located on City property, notice of the
determination shall not be posted on any tree where the Director
determines that access to said tree is too difficult or hazardous to post the
notice.
Section 6: For the foregoing reasons, and based on the information and
findings included in the Staff Report, the testimony and evidence presented at
the public hearings, minutes, and other records of the proceedings, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby recommends that the
City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Section 17.76,100 of the City's
Municipal Code,
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of July 2013, by the
following vote:
AYES: Chairman Emenhiser, Commissioners Nelson, Tomblin, Gerstner
NOES: None
ABSTENTION: None
ABSENT: Vice Chairman Leon, Commissioners Lewis, Tetreault
RECUSALS: None
D'6711dffmeniser
Chairman
Joel Roja Al P
Communi D elopme D rector; and
Secretary e Plannin ommission
P.C. Resolution No. 2013-17
Page 3 of 6
EXHIBIT "A"'
(Addendum No. 6 to Negative Declaration)
Project Background: On June 1, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
2010-43, thereby adopting a Negative Declaration for miscellaneous amendments to
Title 17 of the City's Municipal Code to enact the Residential Development
Standards Steering Committee Code Amendment and Zone Change (Ordinance No.
510). Prior to its adoption, the Negative Declaration was circulated for public
comment from April 1, 2010, through May 1, 2010. In adopting the Negative
Declaration, the City Council found that: 1) the Negative Declaration was prepared in
the manner required by law and that there was no substantial evidence that, with
appropriate mitigation measures, the approval of the Residential Development
Standards Steering Committee Code Amendment and Zone Change (Case No.
ZON2007-00377) would result in a significant adverse effect upon the environment;
and 2) that the Residential Development Standards Steering Committee Code
Amendment and Zone Change were consistent with the Rancho Palos Verdes
General Plan and with the Coastal Specific Plan. On September 21, 2010, the City
Council adopted Ordinance No, 513U, thereby approving Addendum No. 1 to the
certified ND, to make minor changes to Chapter 17,38 of the Development Code to
correct the omission of Specific Plan District VII, and to change the designation of
specific plan districts from numbered to descriptive titles. On November 15, 2011,
the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 529, thereby approving Addendum No. 2 to
the certified ND and approving miscellaneous "clean-up" code amendments to Title
17 (Zoning) of the City's Development Code which clarified code language, removed
code language discrepancies, and codified existing policy procedures and/or
application requirements. On February 7, 2012, the City Council adopted Ordinance
No. 532, thereby approved Addendum No. 3 to the certified ND and approving a
change in the allowable movement of an open space hazard boundary line from
thirty feet to one hundred feet through an interpretation procedure. On April 3, 2012,
the City Council approved adopted Ordinance No, 535, thereby approving
Addendum No. 4 to the Certified ND for a code amendment to revise Chapters
17.02, 17.04, and 17.98 of the Municipal Code to regulate the number of residential
garage sales. On July 16, 2013, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2013-48
that approved Addendum No. 5 to the Certified ND for a code amendment to revise
Chapter 17.76.030 of the Development Code pertaining to the Fences, Walls and
Hedges permits.
Proposed Amendments: The proposed code amendment to revise Chapter
17.76.100 of the Municipal Code (City Tree Review Permit) would revise code
language to expand public notification of City Tree Review Permit approvals and
clarify that only City of Rancho Palos Verdes are notified of the permit approvals.
Purpose: This Addendum to the previously-certified Negative Declaration is being
prepared pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines which allows for the lead agency to prepare an addendum to an
adopted Negative Declaration if only minor technical changes or additions are
necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the
preparation of a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration have occurred. Pursuant to
CEQA Section 15162, no subsequent Negative Declaration shall be prepared for the
project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in
P.C. Resolution No, 2013-17
Page 4 of 6
light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
I Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will required major
revisions of the previous Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new,
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken which will required major revisions of the previous
Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity or previously identified
significant effects; or,
3. New information of substantial importance identifies one or more significant
effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, significant effects
previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the
previous Negative Declaration, mitigation measures or alternative previously
found not to be feasible or not analyzed in the Negative Declaration would be
feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects but the
project proponents decline to adopt a measure or alternative.
Findings Regarding the Proposed Project Revisions:
Staff analyzed the proposed code amendment revisions to Section 17.76,100 to
determine if any impacts would result. The Planning Commission has independently
reviewed this item and has determined that, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15162, a new Negative Declaration is not required for this revision because the
proposed amendments will not result in any new significant environmental effects.
1. The proposed revisions do not result in any new significant environmental
effects and, like Ordinance No. 510, 513U, 529, 532, 535, and 546 no
significant impacts have been identified. The revisions to Title 17 (Zoning) do
not present new significant environmental impacts because they merely
modify or clarify certain requirements and/or codify policy procedures
application requirements. Therefore, the proposed revisions do not represent
a substantial change in the code, and will not result in new significant
environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any
impacts.
2. The proposed revisions will not result in any significant environmental
impacts, and the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken
have not substantially changed since the CEQA determination was made for
Ordinance No. 510. The scope of the proposed revisions relate to minor
modifications that merely modify or clarify certain requirements and/or codify
policies and procedures that are currently in place. There are no changes
with respect to the circumstances under which the revisions are undertaken
that will require major revisions of the previous Negative Declaration.
I No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the
P.C. Resolution No. 2013-17
Page 5 of 6
time the prior Negative Declaration was adopted, identifies a significant
environmental effect. Because the proposed revisions would not result in any
new or more severe environmental impacts than those associated with
Ordinance No. 510, there is no need for new or substantially modified
mitigation measures.
Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds that no further
environmental review is necessary other than the City Council's adoption of this
Addendum No. 6.
P.C. Resolution No. 2013-17
Page 6 of 6