PC RES 2012-001 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES RECOMMENDING THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REVISING
SECTION 17.90 OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE, THEREBY
CHANGING THE ALLOWABLE MOVEMENT OF AN OPEN-
SPACE HAZARD BOUNDARY LINE THROUGH THE
INTERPRETATION PROCEDURE FROM THIRTY (30) FEET TO
ONE-HUNDRED (100) FEET (CASE NO. ZON2011-00168).
WHEREAS, on April 15, 1997, Ordinance No. 320 was adopted by the
City Council for various amendments and changes to Title 16 and 17 of the City's
Municipal Code, including the creation of the Interpretation Procedure (Chapter
17.90); and,
WHEREAS, Municipal Code Chapter 17.90 allows the discretionary
adjustment of zoning or special district boundary lines depicted on the City's
Official Zoning Map without the processing of a Zone Change, as well as allows
interpretations to be made in cases of uncertainty or ambiguity as to the meaning
or intent of the City's Building or Development Codes; and,
WHEREAS, since adoption of the Interpretation Procedure in 1997, the
City has processed interpretations on six different properties where the Open
Space Hazard ("OH") District was located on the developed portion of a
residential property and the OH District boundary line could be moved a small
distance to accurately reflect site conditions; and,
WHEREAS, based upon the comments from the public and the Planning
Commission, it was suggested that the City consider increasing the allowable
movement of a boundary line through the Interpretation Procedure described in
Chapter 17.90; and,
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2011, the City Council initiated a Code
Amendment to revise Municipal Code Chapter 17.90 to amend the Interpretation
Procedures to allow the Community Development Director, upon initiation by a
property owner, to make administrative adjustments of a zoning or special district
boundary line from thirty feet to one-hundred feet without the processing of a
Zoning Map amendment; and,
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2011, Staff mailed out 1,160 notices to
property owners with property that was identified to have some portion of the OH
zoning district on their properties; and,
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2011, notice of a public hearing on the
proposed amendments to Chapter 17.90 of the Municipal Code was published in
the Palos Verdes Peninsula News; and,
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 1 of 10
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act, Public Resources Code Sections 2100 et seq. ("CEQA"), the State's
CEQA Guidelines, California Code Regulations, Title 14, Section 1500 et seq.,
the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65962.5(f)
(Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement), the City determined that there is
no substantial evidence that the code amendment would result in a significant
adverse effect on the environment. Accordingly, Addendum No. 3 to the
Negative Declaration, which was prepared in conjunction with the adoption of
Ordinance No. 510, has been prepared and is attached to this resolution; and,
WHEREAS, after notice was issued pursuant to the requirements of the
Rancho Palos Verdes Development Code, the Planning Commission held a duly
noticed public hearing on December 13, 2011, at which time Staff presented the
proposed language to implement the amended interpretation procedure. Based
on public testimony, the Planning Commission moved to continue the public
hearing to January 10, 2012, with direction to Staff to: add to the
recommendation to the Council that they waive appeal fees in addition to the
application fees for an interpretation procedure; add code language which allows
the Director to make "common sense" moves to the OH boundary lines, based
upon criteria established by the City Geologist; address the issue for properties
located completely within the OH area, where the OH boundary line does not
"traverse" the property; make the Council aware of the costs of to the property
owner for third party geological review; establish a time limit for how long the
Director could conduct discretionary adjustments to OH boundary lines; and,
address the issue of successive applications; and,
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public
hearing, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be
heard and present evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: That the amendments to Title 17 of the Municipal Code are
consistent with California Government Code Section 65853, zoning amendment
procedures.
Section 2: That the amendments to Title 17 are consistent with the
Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan and Coastal Specific Plan in that they
uphold, and do not hinder, the goals and policies of those plans. Specifically, the
revisions to Chapter 17.90 will allow property owners more flexibility to adjust the
open space hazard zoning district boundary line to more accurately reflect the
site conditions on property.
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 2 of 10
Section 3: That the amendments to Chapter 17.90 are necessary to
preserve the public health, safety, and general welfare in the area
Section 4: That Chapter 17.90 (Interpretation Procedure) of Title 17 of
the Municipal Code is hereby revised as follows (strikethrough text for language
removed, and bold and underlined text for new language):
17.90.010 - Purpose and scope.
This chapter provides a procedure for the following interpretations to the
Municipal Code:
A. In cases of uncertainty or ambiguity as to the meaning or intent of any
provision of Title 16 or Title 17 of this Code, or to further define or
enumerate the uses permitted in the various zeses zoning districts. -a-Ad
upon PFGPeF initiation as provided in SeGtion 17.90.020 of thiS GhapteF, the
Said interpretations shall be generally applicable to all situations of
the same type and shall not be limited or directed to specific parcels
or circumstances thereon.
B. An adjustment of an open-space hazard zoning erspeoiat district
boundary line (except within the coastal zone) up to one hundred
(100) feet from the location depicted on the city's official zoning map
feet frnrn the seared—loGatiGi f--t7m—the zoning ma also he
and if such adjustment is necessary to demarcate a more accurate and
precise location of the open-space hazard district boundary line on
the official zoning map, based on site conditions and neoloav of suGh
C. An adjustment of a Coastal specific plan setback zone boundary lines=
or open-space hazard district boundary lines within the coastal zone,
up to five (5) feet from the location depicted on the city's official
zoning map, if such adjustment is
necessary to demarcate a more accurate and precise location of the
open-space hazard district boundary line on the official zoning map,
based on site conditions and approved geology. URdeF the
CxGept in the Gass of .+
adjustment,
inteFpFetations shall be
app"Gable to all futuFe situations o. the same type and shall no
D. An adoustment to a zoning or special district boundary line, other
than the open-space hazard district boundary line or a coastal
specific plan setback zone boundary line, of up to thirty (30) feet
from the location depicted on the official zoning map.
(Ord. 320 § 7 (part), 1997)
17.90.020 - Initiation.
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 3 of 10
A. The pFepaFatien e An interpretation related to Section 17.90.010.A
17.90.010.0 or 17.90.010.13 may be initiated by the city council, planning
commission, director, or by any person
upon the written request and payment of fee, as established pursuant to
city council resolution,by aRy-person.
B. An interpretation related to Section 17.90.010.8 may only be initiated
by the owner of the property on which said open-space hazard
zoning district is located.
1. The written interpretation request shall include the property
address, the requested distance that the zoning district boundary
line or area is to be adjusted from the location depicted on the
zoning map, and the property owner's original signature.
Furthermore, said written request shall be accompanied by a
scaled site plan, including the property lines, the existing open-
space hazard boundary line, and the proposed new boundary line
with the scaled distance of the proposed movement of the
boundary line, as well as a fee for a geological site inspection by
the city's geotechnical staff to verify that the proposed adiustment
of an open space hazard zoning district boundary line will not
adversely impact the public health, safety and welfare.
2. Requests for interpretation pursuant to Section 17.90.010.13 for anv
lot or parcel cannot exceed a cumulative total of 100 feet from the
original location of the open-space hazard line.
(Ord. 320 § 7 (part), 1997)
17.90.030 - Basis of interpretation.
A. An interpretation shall be based on an examination of the intent of this
Code, considering all the relevant provisions thereof, and shall be
consistent with such intent. Consideration shall be given to the relationship
among the regulations of the various zoning classifications and the uses
and development standards therein.
B. In the case of an interpretation involving further definition or enumeration
of uses permitted in a particular zone, consideration shall be given to the
similarities and differences between the characteristics of each use
subject to interpretation and the characteristics of those uses expressly
permitted in the zone.
C. In the case of an interpretation involving the location of a-n-open-space
a coastal specific plan setback zone boundary
line, consideration shall be based on geotechnical and/or soils reports.
D. In the case of an interpretation involving the location of an open
space hazard zoning district boundary line, consideration shall be
based on geotechnical and/or soils reports, only if required by the
city's geotechnical staff after the initial geoloqical site inspection.
Otherwise, the interpretation will be based upon the geological site
inspection and site conditions.
(Ord. 320 § 7 (part), 1997)
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 4 of 10
17.90.040 - Preparation, notice and transmittal.
A. For interpretations related to Section 17.90.010.A, within thirty days
after the initiation of an interpretation, the director shall prepare a written
interpretation and transmit it to the planning commission and the city
council and shall give public notice that such interpretation has been
prepared. Such notice shall be published and given to the property owner,
any interested parties, and any affected homeowner associations, as
required for a code amendment, pursuant to Chapter 17.68 (Zone
Changes and Code Amendments) of this title.
W ithin fifteen calendar days after the date of the notice, the planning
commission, city council or any interested person may make a written
request to the director for a hearing. If no such request for a hearing is
received, the interpretation shall become effective and final fifteen
calendar days after the date of the notice.
B. For interpretations pursuant to Sections 17.90.010.13, 17.90.010.0 or
17.90.010.D., within thirty days after the initiation request has been
deemed complete by Staff, the director shall prepare a written
interpretation and transmit it to the person requesting the
interpretation, owners of all abutting properties, and any interested
person. Within five calendar days after the date of the Director's
notice, the person requesting the interpretation, the abutting
property owners, and any interested person may file a written appeal
of the decision of the director to the planning commission, and any
decision of the planning commission to the city council, pursuant to
Chapter 17.80 (Hearing Notice and Appeal Procedures) of this title.
Within 15 calendar days of filing an appeal, the appellant appealing a
decision related to Section 17.90.010.13 and C must submit the basis
for the appeal supported by a letter or report from a registered
geologist or geotechnical engineer. If no timely written appeal is
submitted or if a written appeal is submitted but no follow-up
geological letter or report is submitted within the time frame
specified, the decision will be final.
(Ord. 320 § 7 (part), 1997)
17.90.050 - Planning commission hearing and action.
A. If a request for an interpretation hearing related to Section 17.90.010.A is
received, or if an appeal of a director interpretation pursuant to
Section 17.09.010.13, 17.09.010.C, or 17.09.010.D is filed, a hearing
shall be held by the planning commission within thirty calendar days of the
date of such request or appeal.
B. A fter the hearing, the planning commission may, by resolution, adopt the
proposed interpretation, adopt a modified or different interpretation, or
refer the matter to the director for further study. Failure of the planning
commission to act within sixty calendar days after the close of the hearing
shall be deemed an approval of the director's interpretation.
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 5 of 10
C. If the planning commission refers the matter to the director for further
study, the director shall prepare and submit another interpretation in
accordance with the provisions of Section 17.90.040 of this chapter.
D. Unless the planning commission refers the interpretation to the director for
further study, the director shall give written notice of the decision of the
planning commission to the applicant, any interested person, and any
affected homeowner association pursuant to Section 17.80.040 (Hearing
Notice and Appeal Procedures) of this title. The decision of the planning
commission shall become effective and final fifteen calendar days after the
date of notice of its action, unless an appeal to the city council is filed in
accordance with Section 17.80.070 (Hearing Notice and Appeal
Procedures) of this title.
(Amended during 11-97 supplement; Ord. 320 § 7 (part), 1997)
17.90.060 - Book of interpretations.
When an interpretation pursuant to Section 17.90.010.A is given final approval
by the director, planning commission or city council, the director shall enter the
interpretation in a book of interpretations which shall be preserved and made
accessible to any interested person. When an interpretation pursuant to
Sections 17.90.010.13, 17.90.010.0 or 17.90.010.D is given final approval, the
interpretation shall be noted in the city's file on the subject property and
updated on the city's official zoning map through the procedure identified
in Section 17.88.020.E.
(Ord. 320 § 7 (part), 1997)
Section 5: That all application and appeal fees associated with an
interpretation request be waived for property owners until the updated General
Plan Land Use Map and Official Zoning Map has been adopted with the revised
open-space hazard areas.
Section 6: The amendments to Title 17 of the Rancho Palos Verdes
Municipal Code as identified in Section 4 shall become effective thirty (30) days
after an ordinance is adopted by the City Council.
Section 7: For the foregoing reasons, and based on the information and
findings included in the Staff Report, the testimony and evidence presented at
the public hears, minutes, and other records of the proceedings, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby recommends that the
City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 17.90 of the City's Municipal
Code, thereby changing the allowable movement of an open-space hazard
boundary line from thirty (30) feet to one-hundred (100) feet through an
4
interpretation procedure.
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 6 of 10
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January 2012, by
the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Emenhiser, Gerstner, Leon, Lewis
NOES: None
ABSTENTION: Chairman Tomblin
ABSENT: vice Chairman Tetreault
RECUSALS: None
David L. Tomblin
Chairman
Joel RojVty
CP
Commuevelopme irector; and
Secretahe Planning Commission
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 7 of 10
EXHIBIT "A"
(Addendum to No. 3 to Negative Declaration)
Project Background: On June 1, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
2010-43, thereby adopting a Negative Declaration for miscellaneous amendments to
Title 17 of the City's Municipal Code to enact the Residential Development
Standards Steering Committee Code Amendment and Zone Change (Ordinance No.
510). Prior to its adoption, the Negative Declaration was circulated for public
comment from April 1, 2010, through May 1, 2010. In adopting the Negative
Declaration, the City Council found that: 1) the Negative Declaration was prepared in
the manner required by law and that there was no substantial evidence that, with
appropriate mitigation measures, the approval of the Residential Development
Standards Steering Committee Code Amendment and Zone Change (Case No.
ZON2007-00377) would result in a significant adverse effect upon the environment;
and 2) that the Residential Development Standards Steering Committee Code
Amendment and Zone Change were consistent with the Rancho Palos Verdes
General Plan and with the Coastal Specific Plan. On September 21, 2010, the City
Council adopted Ordinance No. 513U, thereby approving Addendum No. 1 to the
certified ND, to make minor changes to Chapter 17.38 of the Development Code to
correct the omission of Specific Plan District VII, and to change the designation of
specific plan districts from numbered to descriptive titles. Additionally, on November
15, 2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 529, thereby approving
Addendum No. 2 to the certified ND and approving miscellaneous "clean-up" code
amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the City's Development Code which clarified
code language, removed code language discrepancies, and codified existing policy
procedures and/or application requirements.
Proposed Amendments: The City Council is currently reviewing a code
amendment to revise Chapter 17.90 of the Development Code (Interpretation
Procedure) that would revise code language, remove code language and codify
existing policy procedures and/or applications. The proposed amendments are to
designate the different types of interpretations that can be requested to the
Community Development Director, clarify who can initiate an interpretation request,
provide further direction as to the processing of interpretation requests, and how
such requests shall be recorded for future reference.
Purpose: This Addendum to the previously-certified Negative Declaration is being
prepared pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines which allows for the lead agency to prepare an addendum to an
adopted Negative Declaration if only minor technical changes or additions are
necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the
preparation of a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration have occurred. Pursuant to
CEQA Section 15162, no subsequent Negative Declaration shall be prepared for the
project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in
light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will required major
revisions of the previous Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new,
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 8 of 10
previously identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken which will required major revisions of the previous
Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity or previously identified
significant effects; or,
3. New information of substantial importance identifies one or more significant
effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, significant effects
previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the
previous Negative Declaration, mitigation measures or alternative previously
found not to be feasible or not analyzed in the Negative Declaration would be
feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects but the
project proponents decline to adopt a measure or alternative.
Findings Regarding the Proposed Project Revisions:
Staff analyzed the proposed code amendment revisions to Chapter 17.90 to
determine if any impacts would result. The Planning Commission has independently
reviewed this item and has determined that, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15162, a new Negative Declaration is not required for this revision because the
proposed amendments will not result in any new significant environmental effects:
1. The proposed revisions do not result in any new significant environmental
effects and, like Ordinance No. 510 and 513U, no significant impacts have
been identified. The revision to Title 17 (Zoning) do not present new
significant environmental impacts because they merely modify or clarify
certain requirements, or codify policy procedures and/or application
requirements. Therefore, the proposed revisions do not represent a
substantial change in the project, and will not result in new significant
environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any
impacts.
2. The proposed revisions will not result in any significant environmental
impacts, and the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken
have not substantially changed since the CEQA determination was made for
Ordinance No. 510. The scope of the proposed revisions relate to minor
modifications that clarify code language discrepancies and/or codify policies
and procedures that are currently in place. There are no changes with respect
to the circumstances under which the revisions are undertaken that will
require major revisions of the previous Negative Declaration.
3. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the
time the prior Negative Declaration was adopted, identifies a significant
environmental effect. Because the proposed revisions would not result in any
new or more severe environmental impacts than those associated with
Ordinance No. 510, there is no need for new or substantially modified
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 9 of 10
mitigation measures.
Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds that no further
environmental review is necessary other than the City Council's adoption of this
Addendum No. 3.
P.C. Resolution No. 2012-01
Page 10 of 10