PC RES 2007-056 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING VIEW
RESTORATION PERMIT NO. 2007-00007 TO TRIM AND
REMOVE FOLIAGE LOCATED AT 2143 DALADIER DRIVE.
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2007, Mr. and Mrs. Maisner, owners of property located at
37 Avenida Corona and Mr. and Mrs. Drociak, property owners located 38 Avenida Corona
(herein "the Applicants"), in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, filed an application
requesting a View Restoration Permit ("Permit") to restore views from their properties that
are significantly impaired by foliage owned by Mr. and Mrs. Galletti, at 2143 Daladier Drive
(herein "the Foliage Owner"), in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes ("City"); and,
WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission ("Commission") hearing was mailed
to the Applicants and the Foliage Owner on June 19, 2007; and,
WHEREAS, on July 24, 2007, after all voting members of the Planning
Commission had visited the sites, the Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to
consider the request, at which time, the item was continued to August 28, 2007; and,
WHEREAS, on August 28, 2007, after all voting members of the Planning
Commission had visited the sites, the Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to
consider the request, at which time, all interested parties were given an opportunity to be
heard and present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. As defined by Section 17.02.040 of the City's Development Code, the
applicant at 37 and 38 Avenida Corona have views of City Lights, Los Angeles Harbor,
Vincent Thomas Bridge and Ocean.
Section 2: The Applicant's viewing area at 37 Avenida Corona, as defined by
Section 17.02.040 of the City's Development Code, is from the living room, front den
("office"), and master bedroom. The Applicant's viewing area at 38 Avenida Corona, as
defined by Section 17.02.040 of the City's Development Code, is from the living room.
Section 3: The Applicants, Mr. & Mrs. Maisner at 37 Avenida Corona and Mr. &
Mrs. Drociak at 38 Avenida Corona have views that are significantly impaired by
eighteen (18) trees and one (1) hedge/tree mix.
Section 4: On February 14, 2007, four property owners on Avenida Corona
including Mr. & Mrs. Maisner at 37 Avenida Corona and Mr. & Mrs. Drociak at 38
Avenida Corona submitted a Notice of Intent to File for View Restoration Application No.
2007-00007. On February 28, 2007 Staff and the View Restoration Mediator met with
Mrs. Gail Galletti to discuss the matter of view impairment in an effort to work out a
P.C. Resolution 2007-56
September 11, 2007
mutually acceptable agreement between the four Applicants and the Foliage Owner.
Subsequent to that meeting, the Mediator facilitated communications between the
Applicants and the Foliage Owner.
Since the Applicants believed that the Foliage Owner and themselves reached an
impasse in the negotiations that could not be resolved through mediation, the
Applicant's elected not to continue with the mediation process (see Early Neighbor
Correspondence, Attachment "4"). Therefore, in accordance with Section V (A) of the
View Restoration Guidelines, the Applicants have complied with the early neighbor
consultation process.
Section 5: All of the foliage that Staff is recommending for trimming and/or
removal is greater than 16 feet in height and exceeds the ridgeline of the primary
structure and significantly impairs the view of the City Lights of San Pedro/Long Beach,
Los Angeles Harbor, and Ocean (San Pedro Bay) from the Applicants' viewing areas.
Section 6: The foliage owner's property at 2143 Daladier Drive is 130 feet from
the closest property line of the Applicant's property at 37 Avenida Corona and 100 feet
from the closest property line of the Applicant's property located 38 Avenida Corona.
Section 7: The foliage owner's property, Lot No. 20 of Tract Map 21143, was
created in June 1956. The Record of Survey Map, Book 64, indicates that the
Applicant's lot at 37 Avenida Corona was created in March 1950. An aerial photograph
taken during the early development of Avenida Corona indicates that no trees existed at
the present location of 2143 Daladier Drive in 1953. This aerial photograph (Fairchild
Collection, Flight C-19715, Frame S4, October 20, 1953) documents that Tract No.
21143, which contains the lot where the Foliage Owner's property is located, was
devoid of trees and had not been graded for the development of residences or
infrastructure such as streets. In addition, the City's records for the Applicant's lot at 38
Avenida Corona indicate that the lot had been legally created in 1958. Though the
foliage owner's property had been created in 1956, grading on the foliage owner's lot
had been completed until December 27, 1960. At the time of lot creation in 1958
(Drociak), the condition of the lot at 2143 Daladier had not been improved with
landscaping, infrastructure nor a residential structure.
Therefore, there is reasonable evidence to conclude that the trees subject to the View
Restoration Permit application request were not view impairing trees at the time the
Applicants' lots were created in 1950.
Section 8: Removal or trimming the foliage as recommended by Staff will not
cause an unreasonable infringement on the privacy of the foliage owner in that the
portions of the trees impairing the view do not currently provide privacy to the foliage
owner's residence. Furthermore, there is no pre-existing privacy as the rear portion of
the Foliage Owner's residence area can be currently observed from surrounding
properties such as 36 and 38 Avenida Corona. As such, removal and/or trimming of the
trees will not cause unreasonable infringement of the privacy of the Foliage Owner.
Section 9. The subject properties are not located in the Miraleste Recreation and
Park District.
Page 2 of 7
P.C. Resolution 2007-56
September 11, 2007
Section 10- Trimming and removal of the subject trees as identified in the
attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit "A"), is necessary in order to restore the
Applicants' views.
Section 11: Pursuant to Section 15304 of the California Environmental Quality
Act, the proposed project is categorically exempt under Class 4 of that section because
the work required to restore the applicant's view does not include the removal of scenic
and mature trees as identified by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes General Plan (Visual
Aspects; Figure 41).
Section 12: Based on the foregoing information, and on the information and
findings included in the Staff report and evidence presented at the public hearing, the
Planning Commission hereby orders the trimming or removal of foliage at 2143 Daladier
Drive in order to restore the views at 37 and 38 Avenida Corona, as provided in and
subject to, the conditions outlined in the attached Exhibit "A".
Section 13. Any interested person aggrieved of this decision or by any portion
of this decision may appeal to the City Council. Pursuant to Section 17. 02.040 (2)(g) of
the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, any such appeal must be filed with the City,
in writing and with the appropriate appeal fee, no later than fifteen (15) days following
September 11, 2007, the date of the Planning Commission's final action.
Section 14: . For the foregoing reasons and based on information and findings
contained in the Staff Reports, minutes, and records of the proceedings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves View Restoration Permit No. 2007-00007 subject to the
Conditions of Approval contained in the attached Exhibit "A", which are necessary to
protect the public health, safety and welfare.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on the 11th day of September 2007.
AYES: ' Commissioners Knight, Lewis, Ruttenberg, Tetreault, Vice Chairman
Perestam, Chairman Gerstner
NOES: None
ABSTENTIONS: commissioner Karp
RECUSALS: None
ABSENT: None -7
io )
Bill Gerstner
Chairman
Joel *'as
Jr
Di ct of Plan�i ,
B ildi g & Code Enforcement
Page 3 of 7
P.C. Resolution 2007-..56
September 11, 2007
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
VIEW RESTORATION PERMIT NO. 2007-00007
1. Eucalyptus tree (labeled Tree Nos. 11):
Raise the crown by removing the lower foliage and non-structural
branches up to the height level indicated by the dashed blue line
shown in Attachment "2" of the July 24, 2007 P.C. Staff Report. Said
trimming shall include lacing the upper portion of remaining crown.
2. Eucalyptus trees (labeled Tree Nos® 2-11):
Remove the Eucalyptus trees. Said removal shall include stump
grinding or flush cutting to existing grade.
3. Canary Island Pine tree (labeled Tree No. 12):
Raise crown to the height level indicated by the dashed blue line
shown in Attachment "2" (July 24, 2007 P.C. Staff Report) during
cooler months of the year (November-March) with the initial trimming
to occur between November 1, 2007 and January 31, 2008. Said
trimming shall include lacing the upper portion of remaining crown.
4. Canary Island Pine trees (labeled Tree os® 13-15)-
Heavily lace trees during cooler months of the year (November-
March) with the initial trimming to occur between November 1, 2007
and January 31, 2008.
5. Ginkgo tree (labeled Tree No® 1 )®
Reduce the crown to the height of the dashed red line shown in
Attachment "2" of the July 24, 2007 P.C. Staff Report. Tree
trimming shall occur during the summer months no later than the
end of August 2008.
6. Aleppo Pine tree (labeled Tree No. 17):
Remove the Aleppo Pine tree. Said removal shall include stump
grinding or flush cutting to existing grade. The applicants shall also
pay the expense for two (2) replacement trees, no larger than 24-
inch box size.
7. Cedar tree (labeled Tree No. 18):
Of the two topmost vertical branches, reduce the height of the
tallest branch 6-8 feet. Subsequently, the foliage owner shall
annually maintain the height and breadth of the tree. Initial trimming
Page 4 of 7
P.C. Resolution 2007-56
September 11, 2007
shall include post-trimming treatment, which may include, but not
limited to chemical injections, if such post-trimming measures are
likely not to cause undue injury or harm to the tree as determined
by a licensed arborist.
8. Kedge/ Tree Mix (labeled Tree No. ):
Reduce the tree/hedge to the height of the roofline level, which is
the same as the dashed red line level shown in Attachment "2" of
the July 24, 2007 P.C. Staff Report.
9. Palm trees (labeled Tree No. -24)a No action at this time.
10.Upon completion of Condition Nos. 1-8, if additional foliage on the subject
property is found to be significantly impairing the views from the determined
viewing areas, then the offending foliage shall be trimmed to a height as not to
significantly impair the view from the Applicants properties and the Applicants
shall be responsible for the additional trimming costs.
11.The foliage owner shall be responsible to maintain the foliage in such a manner
as to not significantly impair the applicants' views by trimming the foliage
specified in this permit on an annual basis, or as specified above, if different,
beginning one year after the initial trimming of the foliage is completed and
verified by Staff.
12.If any tree that is ordered to be laced or trimmed dies within one year of the initial
work being performed due to the performance of the work, the Applicants shall
be responsible for providing a replacement tree or shrub to the foliage owner.
This time period may be extended by the Commission if evidence is provided by
a certified arborist that a longer monitoring period is necessary for a specific type
of tree or shrub. The replacement foliage shall be provided in accordance with
the specifications described in section VI-E (Commission Action) of these
Guidelines. If the work is performed by the foliage owner, said foliage owner
shall forfeit the right to replacement foliage if the trimmed tree dies. If a tree or
shrub dies it is subject to removal pursuant to Section 8.24.060 (property
maintenance) of the RPV Municipal.
13.The Applicants shall present to the City, at least one itemized estimate to carry
out the aforementioned work. Such estimate is to be supplied by a licensed
landscape or licensed tree service contractor, acceptable to the City, which
provides insurance certificates in a form acceptable to the City, and shall include
all costs of cleanup and removal of debris and the cost if have an ISA certified
tree trimmer or accredited arborist on site to perform or supervise the work being
done. in addition, the applicants shall pay to the City an amount equal to the City
accepted estimate and such funds shall be maintained in a City trust account
until completion of work as verified by City Staff.
14.The foliage owner shall select a contractor from the estimate(s) provided by the
applicants or another licensed firm of their choice subject to approval by the City,
Page 5 of 7
P.C. Resolution 2007-56
September 11, 2007
to perform the required work. However, the foliage owner shall only be
reimbursed for the amount of the lowest bid submitted by the applicant. If the
foliage owner chooses to do the required work, then the foliage owner shall not
be compensated from the trust account and the amount in the trust account shall
be refunded to the applicants.
15.The applicants may reduce the scope of the trimming required by this Permit by
giving the City and the foliage owner written notice of such decision within 30
days of this approval. The applicants shall deposit funds to the City in a trust
account in an amount sufficient to cover the remaining work. However, trimming
or removal of the vegetation that the applicant has chosen to eliminate would
then require an entirely new View Restoration application and fee.
16.The applicants may withdraw the view restoration request and the trust account
funds if the applicants do so within five (6) days after the applicants sends the
estimate required herein. In the event that the applicant withdraws the request in
a timely manner, the foliage owner is not required to perform the work specified
by this Permit and this Permit is of no further force and effect.
17.The foliage owner shall, no later than 90 days after the Notice of Approval (First
Notice) is mailed, complete the work to the extent required by this Permit and
shall maintain the vegetation to a height that will not impair the view from the
applicants' properties in the future as specified in these Conditions of Approval.
If any foliage owner herein does not complete the required work as specified
within 90 days of the issuance of the Notice of Approval, then the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes will authorize a bonded tree service to perform the work at the
subject property and at the foliage owner's expense. In the event that the City is
required to perform the work at the foliage owner's expense, the City shall
reimburse the applicants from the City trust account not later than 30 days after
the expiration of the time period stipulated above.
18.Upon completion of the work, the foliage owner shall notify the City and shall
submit a copy of a paid invoice showing that the work was performed. Upon
submittal of the invoice and verification by City Staff of compliance, the City shall
transmit the funds from the City trust account to the foliage owner not later than
30 days after receipt of the appropriate billing as verified by City Staff. If the paid
invoice submitted by the foliage owner is for an amount less than the funds in the
City's trust account, the foliage owner shall only be transmitted an amount equal
to the actual cost of the trimming. In such situations, the balance of the trust
account shall be refunded back to the applicant (within 30 days of receipt of the
appropriate billing) or applied to the applicants' permit processing account, if that
account contains a negative balance. If the paid invoice submitted by the foliage
owner is for an amount that exceeds the funds in the City's trust account, the
foliage owner shall only receive the funds from the City trust account and the
foliage owner shall be responsible for paying the difference
19.If the required work as specified herein is not completed within the stipulated time
periods, then the City of Rancho Palos Verdes will utilize the City's code
Page 6 of 7
P.C. Resolution 2007-56
September 11, 2007
enforcement process to authorize a bonded tree service to perform the work at
the subject property at the foliage owner's expense, and the applicants' deposit
will be refunded. In the event that the City is required to perform the work, the
foliage owner will be billed for all City expenses incurred in enforcing the View
Restoration order and a lien or assessment may be recorded against the foliage
owner's property if the invoice is not paid.
20.Subsequent to the trimming or removal of the foliage, the, restored view shall be
documented by Staff. The photographic documentation shall be kept on file at
the Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Department and used as a
benchmark by City Staff for making a determination of significant view
impairment in any future view preservation enforcement actions. If foliage not
subject to this View Restoration Permit should grow and impair the documented
views, said foliage shall be considered significant view impairing foliage and shall
be trimmed or removed by the Foliage Owner to match the view shown on the
documented photograph.
Page 7 of 7
P.C. Resolution 2007-56
September 11, 2007