PC RES 2005-044 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO POS VERDES APPROVING, WITH
CONDITIONS, A VARIANCE AND EXTREME SLOPE PERMIT
(CASE NO. ZON2005-00320), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
27544 ELMBRIDGE DRIVE.
WHEREAS, On September 22, 2000, the City received a complaint about alleged
unpermitted work being performed on the subject property. A subsequent site visit and
a review of city files revealed that an unpermitted deck had been constructed, which
extended over an extreme slope in the rear yard of the property. Accordingly, staff
opened a code enforcement case and notified the property owner of the violation. After
several notices and attempts by staff to get the property owner to comply with City
codes, staff referred this matter to the City Attorney for potential legal action.
Subsequent to a lawsuit being filed by the City, the property owner entered into a court-
monitored agreement with the City that stipulates that he would either remove the
unpermitted deck or file an application as an attempt to legalize the deck; and,
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2005, the applicant submitted a Variance and Extreme
Slope Permit application requesting to legalize the deck. On July 20, 2005, staff
completed the initial review of the application, at which time the application was deemed
incomplete due to missing information on the project plans. On August 22, 2005, the
applicant submitted the remaining information to staff that was needed to complete the
application; and,
WHEREAS, the Variance and Extreme Slope Permit applications were deemed
complete by staff on August 31, 2005; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et. seq. ("CEQA"), the State's CEQA
Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq., the City's
Local CEQA Guidelines, and Government Code Section 65962.5(f) (Hazardous Waste
and Substances Statement), Staff found no evidence that the Variance and Extreme
Slope Permit would have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the
proposed project has been found to be categorically exempt under Class 1 (Section
15301); and,
WHEREAS, after notice was issued pursuant to the requirements of the Rancho
Palos Verdes Development Code, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing on October 11, 2005 at which time all interested parties were given
opportunities to be heard and present evidence; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
P.C. Resolution No. 2005-44
Page 1 of 6
Section 1: That the approved project includes the construction of a 425 square
foot deck over an extreme slope and deviation from the maximum height of 12' and the
6' maximum a deck may extend over an extreme slope.
Section 2: The Extreme Slope Permit is warranted since the site cannot
reasonably accommodate the structure except on an extreme slope. Further, due to the
location of the residence and the extreme slope at the rear of the building pad there is a
limited useable rear yard, and only reasonably method to increase the size of the
useable rear yard is to provide a deck over an extreme slope.
Section 3: The Extreme Slope Permit is warranted since the permit will result
in no significant adverse effect on neighboring properties. As part of the building and
safety review of the deck, the applicant will need to obtain approval from the City's
Geologist that the deck will not create a negative geological impact to the area.
Additionally, the applicant will need to satisfy the City's Building Official that the deck
has been engineered and constructed in a manner that meets the requirements of the
Building Code. Furthermore, in order to mitigate any negative visual impacts to the
properties downslope of the subject site (located on Browndeer), a condition of approval
has been added that requires adequate landscaping be used to screen the deck.
Section 4: The Extreme Slope Permit is warranted since the structure will not
result in an unreasonable infringement of the privacy of the occupants of abutting
residences. Due to the location and distance between the deck and other structures in
the area, standing on the deck does not give the property owner an additional ability to
view into another home in the area or into another property that the property owner
does not currently have.
Section 5: The Extreme Slope Permit is warranted since any disturbance of
the slope will be insignificant. Based on the initial site visit conducted by the Building
Official, the only disturbance to the slope is caused by the foundations of the deck.
When comparing this to the size of the slope, this disturbance is minimal as compared
to the entire slope.
Section 6: The Extreme Slope Permit is warranted since the permit is
consistent with the general plan, coastal specific plan or any other applicable plan.
Based on the analysis of the project, it is found that the deck complies with the General
Plan goal to preserve and enhance the community's quality living environment; to
enhance the visual character and physical quality of existing neighborhoods; and to
encourage the development of housing in a manner which adequately serves the needs
of all present and future residents of the community.
Section 7: The Variance is warranted since there is an exceptional or
extraordinary circumstance applicable to the property, which does not apply generally to
other properties in the same zoning district. The substandard lot size and the limited
useable rear yard creates an extraordinary circumstance, which does not apply
generally to other properties in the RS-4 zone, thus requiring the applicant to exceed
P.C. Resolution No. 2005-44
Page 2 of 6
the 6' limit for the deck. Furthermore due to the nature of the topography of the slope,
the excessive height is needed to properly construct the deck.
Section 8: The Variance is warranted since it is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, which is possessed by
other property owners under like conditions in the same zoning district. At least ten
other properties within the vicinity of the site have large decks constructed onto extreme
slopes in order to increase the size of the useable rear yard. This includes at least one
Variance, which was granted by the City in 1996, for the property located at 27520
Elmbridge. Some of these other decks extend a similar distance onto the extreme
slopes and have a similar deck height as the subject property. As such, it is found that
the deck is necessary for the property owner to enjoy the useable potion of their rear
yard, which is a right that is possessed by other property owners under like conditions in
the same zoning district. Furthermore, in order for the property owner to enjoy this right,
the deviation in the height and length of the deck are necessary to construct a similar
size deck as other property owners have.
Section 9: The Variance is warranted since granting the deviations will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property and improvements in
the area. As part of the building and safety review of the deck, the applicant will need to
obtain approval from the City's Geologist that the deck will not create a negative
geological impact to the area, and satisfy the City's Building Official that the deck has
been engineered and constructed in a manner that meets the requirements of the
Building Code. Furthermore, in order to mitigate any negative visual impacts to the
properties downslope of the subject site (located on Browndeer), a condition of approval
has been added that requires adequate landscaping be used to screen the deck.
Section 10: The Variance is warranted since allowing the deviation will not be
contrary to the objectives of the General Plan. Based on the analysis of the project, it is
found that the deck complies with the General Plan goal to preserve and enhance the
community's quality living environment; to enhance the visual character and physical
quality of existing neighborhoods; and to encourage the development of housing in a
manner which adequately serves the needs of all present and future residents of the
community.
Section 11: Any interested person aggrieved by this decision or any portion of
this decision may appeal to the City Council. Pursuant to Sections 17.64.060,
17.76.060(H) and 17.80.070 of the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, any such
appeal must be filed with the City, in writing, and with the appropriate appeal fee, no
later than October 26, 2005.
Section 12: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information and
findings included in the Staff Report, Minutes and other records of proceedings, the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby approves the
Variance and Extreme Slope Permit applications to allow for the construction of a 425
square foot deck over an extreme slope and deviation from the maximum height of 12'
and the 6' maximum a deck may extend over an extreme slope (Case No. ZON2005-
P.C. Resolution No. 2005-44
Page 3 of 6
00320); subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit W, attached hereto and made a
part hereof, which are necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare in the
area.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of October 2005, by the following
vote:
AYES: GERSTNER, KARP, KNIGHT, MUELLER, PERESTAM, TETREAULT
NOES: NONE
ABSTENTIONS: NONE
ABSENT: GOLIDA
Paul Tetreault,
Chairman
ic(el Nojas, AlP f/' 'I
D ect r of Pla,6�ig, Building and Code Enforcement; and,
Se tart'to the Planning Commission
P.C. Resolution No. 2005-44
Page 4 of 6
Exhibit "A"
Conditions of Approval
(Planning Commission Resolution No. 2005-44)
Variance and Extreme Slope Permit (Case o® ZON2005-00320)
1 The approval of a Variance and Extreme Slope Permit is to allow for the
construction of a 425 square foot deck over an extreme slope and deviation from
the maximum height of 12' and the 6' maximum a deck may extend over an
extreme slope.
2. Approval of this Variance and Extreme Slope Permit shall not be construed to
mean any waiver of applicable and appropriate zoning regulations, or any
Federal, State, County, and City laws and regulations. Unless otherwise
expressly specified, all other requirements of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Municipal Code shall apply.
3. The applicant/property owner shall submit to the City a statement, in writing that
they have read, understand and agree to all conditions of approval listed below.
Failure to provide said written statement within ninety (90) days of the effective
date of approval shall render this approval null and void.
4. The approval shall become null and void after one (1) year from the date of this
approval unless the approved plans are submitted to the Building and Safety
Division to initiate the "plan check" review process, pursuant to Section
17.86.070 of the City's Development Code. This approval shall become null and
void if, after initiating the "plan check" review process, or receiving a building
permit to begin construction, said "plan check" or permit is allowed to expire or is
withdrawn by the applicant.
5. The Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement is authorized to make
minor modifications to the approved preliminary plans or any of the conditions if
such modifications shall achieve substantially the same results as would strict
compliance with said plans and conditions.
6. Permitted hours of construction are 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday. No work is permitted on Sundays or legal holidays.
7. The project shall substantially conform to the plans stamped, and dated the
effective date of this approval, approved by the Planning Department.
8. The construction site, adjacent public and private properties shall be kept free of
all loose materials resembling trash and debris in excess of that material used for
immediate construction purposes. Such excess material may include, but not be
limited to: the accumulation of debris, garbage, lumber, scrap metal, concrete
asphalt, piles of earth, salvage materials, abandoned or discarded furniture,
appliances or other household fixtures.
P.C. Resolution No. 2005-44
Page 5 of 6
9. In the event that a Planning requirement and a Building & Safety requirement are
in conflict with one another, the stricter standard shall apply.
10. All applicable permits required by the Building and Safety Division shall be
obtained by the applicant.
11. Unless modified by a future approval, the subject site shall maintain a maximum
36% lot coverage.
12. The proposed residence shall not exceed a height of 13', as measured from the
lowest grade adjacent to the foundation/slab to the top of rail.
13. The deck shall not extend more that 16' onto the extreme slope, as measured on
a horizontal plane from the top of the slope.
14. The property owner shall plant and maintain sufficient foliage to screen the deck
from view of the neighboring properties. Prior to the issuance of building
permits, the applicant shall submit a plan that indicates the species, numbers,
and location of the landscaping. This plan shall be subject to the review and
approval of the Director of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement. Said
landscaping shall be planted by the applicant and inspected by Planning Staff,
prior to the issuance of building permit final.
15. Unless modified by a future approval, the deck shall maintain the following
minimum setbacks:
39'-0" rear
8'-5" south side
27'-4" north side
P.C. Resolution No. 2005-44
Page 6 of 6