PC MINS 20110712 Approved
July 26, 2011
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES fl-
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 12, 2011
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Tomblin at 7:08 p.m. at the Fred Hesse
Community Room, 29301 Hawthorne Boulevard.
FLAG SALUTE
Vice Chairman Tetreault led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance.
ATTENDANCE
Present: Commissioners Gerstner, Knight, Lewis, Vice Chairman Tetreault, and
Chairman Tomblin.
Absent: Commissioners Emenhiser and Leon were excused.
Also present were Community Development Director Rojas, Deputy Community
Development Director Pfost, Assistant Planner Kim, and Assistant Planner Harwell.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The Agenda was unanimously approved as presented.
COMMUNICATIONS
Director Rojas reported that at the July 5t" meeting the City Council overturned the
Planning Commission's decision to trim several view impairing trees along Via
Cambron, Via Collado and Berry Hill Drive and instead directed that all the city trees be
removed. He also reported that the City Council initiated a code amendment to make
minor miscellaneous clean-up amendments to the Development Code.
Director Rojas distributed two items of correspondence for agenda item No. 4.
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (Eqgardinci non-agenda items):
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Time extension for Conditional Use Permit Revision and Sign Permit (Case
No. ZON2009-00469): 27774 Hawthorne Blvd.
Commissioner Lewis moved to approve the Consent Calendar, seconded by
Commissioner Knight. Approved without objection.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Height Variation, Grading Permit and Site Plan Review JCase No. ZON201 1-
00064): 2733 San Ramon Drive
Assistant Planner Harwell presented the staff report, explaining the scope of the project
and the need for the various permits, as discussed in the staff report. She stated that
staff felt all of the required findings for the proposed addition above 16 feet in height
could be made, as well as the findings for the Grading Permit. She noted that there
currently is foliage in the rear yard of the property which impairs the view from the
neighboring property and the property across the canyon. As a condition of approval
this foliage will be required to be removed and verified prior to issuance of the building
permit. With that, staff is recommending approval of the proposed project as
conditioned in the staff report.
Chairman Tomblin opened the public hearing.
Roger North (architect) explained that the owners have been diligent in trying to find a
solution to the problem they have of needing more room in their home for their family as
well as being a good neighbor with respect to the design of their proposed addition. He
felt the proposed additions will help balance the look of the house and noted the
ridgeline will only increase by six inches,
Commissioner Knight asked Mr. North what he plans to use for the non-pervious
surfaces where the concrete patio currently exists.
Mr. North answered that has not yet been determined, noting there is a variety of things,
that can be done.
Bret Andrus (owner) stated that he has tried very hard to make the proposed addition to
blend in with the neighborhood, and was available for any questions.
Chairman Tomblin closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Knight felt this is an example of an application to expand on a piece of
property that will actually improve the property. He stated that he was able to make the
findings and was in favor of the project.
Commissioner Knight moved to approve the project as recommended and
conditioned by staff, seconded by Vice Chairman Tetreault. PC Resolution 2011-
26 was approved, (5-0).
3. Conditional Use Permit Revision (Case No. ZON2011-00131): 27501
Western Avenue
Planning Commission Minutes
July 12,2011
Page 2
Assistant Planner Kim presented the staff report, explaining the scope of the project.
She explained that since the only difference between the existing and the proposal is
only a negligible visible difference staff was able to make all of the required findings to
recommend approval.
Chairman Tomblin opened the public hearing.
Nicolas Faure (representing AT&T) stated he has read the staff report and is in
agreement with the conditions of approval.
Commissioner Knight asked if other antennas on the building were owned by AT&T.
Mr. Faure answered they are not AT&T's antennas.
Chairman Tomblin closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Lewis moved to approve the project as recommended by staff,
seconded by Commissioner Knight. PC Resolution was approved, (5-0).
4. General Plan Update— Review
Deputy Director Pfost presented the staff report, explaining that the Coastal Specific
Plan Map was adopted in 1978 and actually changed some of the land uses from the
General Plan. The Zoning Map was subsequently created, and he noted that the
Zoning Map is fairly consistent with the Coastal Specific Plan Map. He explained that
over the years, since 1978, staff has been implementing the Coastal Specific Plan and
the Zoning Map in regards to various areas. He stated that the proposed changes are
only to make the General Plan be consistent with what the Coastal Specific Land Use
Map is, which should have been done in 1978 when the City adopted the Coastal
Specific Land Use Map. He then reviewed the proposed changes.
Commissioner Lewis asked if there is anything in this that will alter ones ability to rebuild
a structure destroyed by fire.
Deputy Director Pfost answered that these proposed amendments will not alter ones
ability to rebuild a structure destroyed by fire.
Commissioner Knight asked if the location of the Coastal Setback Line is part of the
language before the Planning Commission.
Deputy Director Pfost explained that the Coastal Setback Line is not part of the General
Plan as the General Plan does not get that specific to include that line.
Commissioner Knight moved to approve the General Plan Land Use Map without
parcels, as recommended by staff, seconded by Commissioner Gerstner.
Approved, (5-0).
Planning Commission Minutes
July 12,2011
Page 3
Deputy Director Pfost then explained that the Planning Commission has now reviewed
all of the elements of the General Plan and staff has combined all of the elements into
one package. Staff has gone through the elements and attempted to make some
recommended changes that will help the document read a bit better, provide some
additional updating, and address any additional Planning Commission questions and
comments. Staff is seeking Planning Commission direction on whether or not staff can
make the recommended changes to the document,
Commissioner Gerstner stated he had not had the opportunity to review the entire
document, and given the importance of the document, would like to be able to have the
time to review it.
Commissioner Knight agreed, adding that he would prefer to have the entire
Commission present for this discussion.
Vice Chairman Tetreault briefly discussed the proposed changes to the General Plan as
well as the interpretation of active and passive recreational uses and asked staff if they
expect some level of controversy in the way this is worded, and if staff feels this area
needs some real focus and attention because of some significant immediate
ramifications.
Director Rojas explained that whatever changes are made to the General Plan will not
be approved by the City Council until early 2012. Therefore whatever projects have
already been submitted to the City are operating under the current General Plan.
Vice Chairman Tetreault asked what happens when a project has been submitted to the
City and in the course of the application process the General Plan is updated and there
could be a possible change that could affect that project.
Director Rojas explained that typically a project will fall under the rules when the
application is submitted to the City. If there is a subsequent change to the Code the
City Council will specify that the changes affect all applications or only applications
submitted from that date forward.
Commissioner Knight moved to continue the review of the General Plan text
amendments to the July 26, 2011 meeting, seconded by Vice Chairman Tetreault.
Unanimously approved.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
S. Minutes of June 14, 2011
Commissioner Gerstner moved to approve the minutes as presented, seconded
by Vice Chairman Tetreault. Approved, (3-0-2) with Commissioners Knight and
Lewis abstaining since they were absent from that meeting.
Planning commission Minutes
July 12,2011
Page 4
6. Minutes of June 28, 2011
Commissioner Gerstner moved to approve the minutes as presented, seconded
by Vice Chairman Tetreault. Approved, (4-0-1) with Commissioner Knight
abstaining since he was absent from that meeting.
ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON FUTURE AGENDAS
7. Pre-agenda for the meeting on JuIv 26, 2011
The pre-agenda was discussed and unanimously accepted.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:59 p.m.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 12,2011
Page 8