Loading...
CC RES 2014-048 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING CERTAIN SPEED SURVEYS AND ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE SURVEYS ON VARIOUS STREETS WITHIN THE CITY. WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 22358.4, 22407 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, engineering and traffic surveys have been conducted on various streets within the City by the City's Consulting Traffic Engineer in accordance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code, including Section 627 of said Code; and WHEREAS, the report and recommendations of the City's Consulting Traffic Engineer and the speed surveys that were conducted were presented for review and concurrence by the City's Traffic Safety Committee, which has recommended approval thereof to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the report and recommendations of the City's Consulting Traffic Engineer and the speed surveys that were conducted by the Traffic Engineer for the street segments that are set forth in bold on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto as and incorporated herein by this reference, were presented for review and approval by the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes at a duly noticed meeting thereof on August 19, 2014; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the establishment of speed limits that are reasonable and safe will facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic within the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Speed limit is established on the following streets in accordance with Section 15.32.010 and 15.32.020 of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Traffic Ordinance adopted pursuant to Section 10.04.010 of the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code: ROAD SURVEYED LIMITS Bayend Drive 09/25/13 15 mph, when children are present, on Bayend Drive from General Street to Crestwood Street. Crenshaw Boulevard 09/25/13 40 miles per hour on Crenshaw Boulevard from Sea Crest Drive to Crest Road. Crenshaw Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Crenshaw Boulevard from Crest Road to the Rolling Hills Estates City boundary. Crest Road 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Crest Road from Hawthorne Boulevard to Crenshaw Boulevard. Crest Road 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Crest Road from Palos Verdes Drive East to Ganado Drive. Crest Road 09/25/13 40 miles per hour on Crest Road from Ganado Drive to the Rolling Hills City Boundary north of Paseo de Pino. Crestridge Road 09/25/13 40 miles per hour on Crestridge Road from Crenshaw Boulevard to Highridge Road. Crestwood Street 09/25/13 15 mph, when children are present, on Crestwood Street from Upland Street to Bayend Drive Forrestal Drive 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Forrestal Drive from Palos Verdes Drive South to the terminus of Forrestal Drive north of Pirate Drive. General Street 09/25/13 15 mph, when children are present, on General Street from Crestwood Street to Bayend Drive Granvia Altamira 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Granvia Resolution No. 2014-48 Page 2 of 6 Altamira from Hawthorne Blvd to the Palos Verdes Estates City Boundary north of Monero Drive. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Palos Verdes Drive West to Vallon Drive. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Vallon Drive to Crest Road. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Crest Road to Eddinghill Drive/Seamount Drive. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Eddinghill Drive/Seamount Drive to Highridge Road/Grayslake Road. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 40 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Grayslake Road/Highridge Road to Indian Peak Road. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 45 miles per hour on Hawthorne Boulevard from Silver Spur Road to the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 40 miles per hour-Truck traffic in northbound direction only on Hawthorne Boulevard from Silver Spur Road to the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary. Hawthorne Boulevard 09/25/13 35 miles per hour-Truck traffic in southbound direction only on Hawthorne Boulevard from Rhone Drive to Palos Verdes Drive West. Resolution No. 2014-48 Page 3 of 6 Highridge Road 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Highridge Road from Hawthorne Boulevard to the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary south of Peacock Ridge Road. Indian Peak Road 06/09/11 40 miles per hour on Indian Peak Road from Crenshaw Boulevard to Rolling Hills Estates City Limits. Miraleste Drive 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Miraleste Drive from Palos Verdes Drive East to Via Colinita. Miraleste Drive 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Miraleste Drive from Via Colinita to the Los Angeles City Boundary south of Suana Drive. Montemalaga Drive 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Montemalaga Drive from Silver Spur Road to the Palos Verdes Estates City Boundary west of Grayslake Road. Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 40 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Palos Verdes Drive South to a point 2,900 feet north of Palos Verdes Drive South. Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 40 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Palos Verdes Drive South to Ganado Drive. Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Ganado Drive to Diamonte Lane Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Diamonte Lane to Miraleste Drive. Resolution No. 2014-48 Page 4 of 6 Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Miraleste Drive to Bronco Drive Palos Verdes Drive East 02/28/12 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive East from Bronco Drive to the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary north of Sunnyside Ridge Road Palos Verdes Drive South 09/25/13 40 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive South from 1300 feet west of Schooner Drive to the Los Angeles City Limit. Palos Verdes Drive South 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive South from 1,500 feet east of Seacove Drive to 1,300 feet west of Schooner Drive. Palos Verdes Drive South 06/09/11 45 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive South/Palos Verdes Drive West from Hawthorne Blvd to 1,500 feet east of Seacove Drive. Palos Verdes Drive West 06/09/11 45 miles per hour on Palos Verdes Drive West from Hawthorne Blvd to North City Limit Ridgegate Drive 09/25/13 25 miles per hour on Ridgegate Drive from Hawthorne Blvd. to Highridge Road. Silver Spur Road 06/09/11 35 miles per hour on Silver Spur Road from the Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary north of Elkmont Drive to the Rolling Hills Estates City boundary south of Silver Arrow Drive. Via Vicente/Calle Entradero 09/25/13 35 miles per hour on Via Vicente/Calle Entradero from Palos Verdes Drive West to Palos Verdes Drive West. Resolution No. 2014-48 Page 5 of 6 Section 2. All previous resolutions and orders establishing speed limits on these roadways within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes are hereby amended to reflect these speed limits. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to file certified copies of this resolution with the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Office. Section 4. The speed limits established in Section 1 of this resolution shall become effective upon posting of the speed limit signs. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 19th day of August '1/ ,A) Mir, 4- , 1, ‘111.11 ' II ..„......... ip Mayor Attest: ,4,c_.,&,9)',1i / City Clerk State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) ss City of Rancho Palos Verdes ) I, Carla Morreale, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 2014-48, was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on August 19, 2014. - / _ ---7h,i,c___ed.,_<..._ City Clerk Resolution No. 2014-48 Page 6 of 6 extending WWILLDAN r Engineering 9 9 September 25, 2013 Ms. Nicole Jules Senior Engineer City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275-5391 Subject: 2013 Engineering and Traffic Survey Dear Ms. Jules: As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and update the posted speed limits along 27 street segments in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. These segments were last surveyed in 2007, and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City's arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices. The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC,following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(California MUTCD) dated January 2012, and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Rancho Palos Verdes and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study. Very truly yours, W I LLDAN coF S Io :- eO $A 444( 0177"' s,"-esAlle4, No.87583 ' s• Vanessa Mun, z P.E. T. 11 14, Itt ExP- '' g' cc 0. Traffic Engine-r ". * J,.30.1L Enclosure >44, RAF ,-41;1-PF , V w Engineering I Geotechnical I Environmental I Sustainability I Financial I Homeland Security 582.908.6200 1800 499.4484 I fax:562.695.2120 113191 Crossroads Parkway North,Suite 405,Industry,CA 91746-3443 I www.willdan.00m Page 1 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1-2 Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey 2-3 SURVEY CONDITIONS 4 Survey Locations 4 Data Collection 4 Speed Data 4 Collision Data 5 Field Review Data 5 ANALYSIS 6 Criteria 6 Results and Recommendations 6-7 Table 1-Segments With Recommended Speed Changes 7 Table 2-Summary of Recommendations 8-9 Segments with Special Conditions 10-13 LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES 14 Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code 14-20 APPENDIX A- Segment Data Street Segment Sheets Radar Speed Distribution Forms APPENDIX B - Collision Rates APPENDIX C - Survey Equipment Used Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 2 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A INTRODUCTION This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes.This Engineering and Traffic Survey presents recommended speed limits for 27 street segments in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices.These surveys must be updated every 5 or 7 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code(CVC). The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012. The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Sheriff's Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City's police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course[CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)]. Additionally,some surveys may be extended to 10 years if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred[CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(ll)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current. The Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(California MUTCD) dated January 2012 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Code further describes three elements of an engineering and traffic survey: 1. Measurement of prevailing speed; 2. Accident history; and 3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist. Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law(CVC Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions. Engineering and Traffic Survey 1 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 3 of 82 Resolution No.2014-48, Exhibit A The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers. Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics,and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion. Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently,only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement. ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are discussed in more detail as follows: Speed Sampling Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed, except as shown in the two options below. Options: 1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. 2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f). Engineering and Traffic Survey 2 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 4 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5 The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria: A. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS. B. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph,then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS. C. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied. Collision History Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than average rate of collisions. A segment that has an above-average collision rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists. A summary of the collision rates for the 27 surveyed street segments is provided in Appendix B. Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. It is important to note that The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. Engineering and Traffic Survey 3 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 5 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A SURVEY CONDITIONS SURVEY LOCATIONS The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following: 1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence. 2. Minimum visibility restrictions. 3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways. 4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle. DATA COLLECTION Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions,visibility restrictions,and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 27 locations during the months of September and October 2012. Speed Data Radar speed measurements were conducted at 27 locations during September and October 2012. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments. Engineering and Traffic Surrey 4 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 6 of 82 Resolution No.2014-48, Exhibit A Collision Data Collision data was obtained from the City's SW 1TRS electronic collision database. For this study,collision data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010. The collision rates for the 27 segments are expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the collision rate: R= Ax1,000,000 tx3b5 daysxixv year = Number of midblock collisions over time period R= Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles) t=Time Period Covered (in years) I= Length of Segment (miles) v=Traffic Volume (average daily traffic) The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate.The average statewide collision rates were obtained from 2009 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans. Field Review Data A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors: 1. Street width and alignment (design speed); 2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics; 3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns; 4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking; 5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices; 6. Visibility obstructions; 7. Land use and proximity to schools; 8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage; 9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions;and 10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver. Engineering and Traffic Survey 5 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 7 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A ANALYSIS CRITERIA Survey data was complied and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012. Some of the criteria used are: A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers"unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The"basic speed limit"is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. B. The 10 mile per hour(mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed. C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average collision rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 2. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless an collision rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report. The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions. The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie Engineering and Traffic Survey 6 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 8 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law(Section 22350 of California Vehicle Code). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions. Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limits and Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments. TABLE 1 STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES No STREET FROM TO EXISTING NEW CHANGE TRUCK SPEED ZONE ON DESCENDING GRADES 23 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 25 40 INCREASE PALOS VERDES DR INCREASE 24 HAWTHORNE BLVD RHONE DR WEST 25 35 IN C Engineering and Traffic Survey 7 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 9 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A „:,,:"..,,,,,,,m,,,m:.:.::.:••-•... . .:...-- ,.—- :4,.,.„!,,„,-,,,„„„,:„,„..,„,i,:: .,,,:,„LiTst r...,;; twi'4, .. ' . . . . . . . . ... . ... , , . - : :.::\4..,,a,,aq,\4?R•:� 4 a a�`.a,, :-.,AG,0 2.:, h \ a.x.• ; .r:.4 x\�”: n. .. �.......\.vv.,vV` V.v`V.........,F\,,�\}vT�.\.'.} `.a^.`\:.�'n.T}j4Sa•.}T,�V `\�a^S+:T.w:'F?..♦.aV4+})TV�♦^:..'� -.• .t U':.v\n \iNLJ\ `:J ? 4, ?. v « ..b j «vvTa.. { a ..ti. .m. .... .a.aa•. ,.. ,. :.-......:.. :,.4..... ♦ � :,.F. , ♦ t ..�R . i T . ...'..... . ........ �` 'n.. ..> f.v� n� a « v« \ a � x\ h ....K \ , a \\ T \ Ck „ r \. vay SAIlv \\en \ v : . . .' ' :11:71.161,1111:11111111011111111117 i -111,411 .. : n ) 1 111 a . \pp aar141111111111111.11111111111111:111111111.1111111 \ - MTav\\� wxaw1\1 \ y vvNvxav:: ' ..\Q \. :.. . . ,.::" . « 111111:',:'l:' .., .. . . '. 1111.1.11:111111111:111111111:1111 v: i.vaTw4 �.v .\x �dAt : 1 CRENSHAW BLVD SEA CREST DR CREST RD 40 41 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 2 CRENSHAW BLVD CREST RD RHE CITY LIMIT 45 47 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 3 CREST RD HAWTHORNE BLVD CRENSHAW BLVD 45 47 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED • 4 CREST RD PALOS VERDES DR F GANADO DR 45 44 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 5 CREST RD GANADO DR RH CITY LIMIT 40 41 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 6 CRESTRIDGE RD CRENSHAW BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD 40 43 40 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 7 FORRESTAL DR PALOS VERDES DR S NORTH TERMINUS 35 37 35 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED v 8 GRANVIA ALTAMIRA HAWTHORNE BLVD PVE CITY LIMIT 35 37 35 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED ca o 9 HAWTHORNE BLVD PALOS VERDES DR W VALLON DR 45 49 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 o 10 HAWTHORNE BLVD VALLON DR CREST RD 45 49 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 co - 1 1 HAWTHORNE BLVD CREST RD EDDINGHILL DR 45 48 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 12 HAWTHORNE BLVD EDDINGHILL DR HIGHRIDGE RD 45 46 45 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 13 HAWTHORNE BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD INDIAN PEAK RD 40 46 40 * 14 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 45 52 45 * 0 0 15 HIGHRIDGE RD HAWTHORNE BLVD RHE CITY LIMIT 35 39 35 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 E • 16 MIRALESTE DR PALOS VERDES DR E VIA COLINITA 35 38 35 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 0 D z 1 17 MIRALESTE DR VIA COLINITA LA CITY LIMIT 35 40 35 o ry 18 MONTEMALAGA DR SILVER SPUR RD PVE CITY LIMIT 35 39 35 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 0 -P. 19 PALOS VERDES DR S1,300'W/O SCHOONER DR LA CITY LIMIT 40 44 40 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 °°m 20 PALOS VERDES DR S1,500' E/O SEACOVE DR 1,300'W10 SCHOONER DR 35 41 35 = * See"Segments with Special Conditions"Section for Comments 5. **=25 mph when children are present > Engineering and Traffic Survey 8 City of Rancho Palos Verdes . w•,•\\.;^�°S•`fir•\�:c.�\; •,.�•. :.ti�: : -::::..r •.•:,...:..:.r..:.:...... .r....... r... ..\....�rf•J�>"• .'\\ .�:ti4:.'C2•�1v'v,,t,. .::K -.v:'�;....,.'.;+::'ti•:,•`.,.•..:•.,•..... vv.:v...,i::.y;•:::,....... : ::,�:•:,�:;yC\ 't�x.0,A.. .� \�`�:t :.Y4:2.' `..,..'✓ '�`�ac+. r_�,.y.`..''.I .S ;x`.'c �•�. `;sk.. �'�„`,�.,`'� ...i�,.,x\y\�'.'a�a�J\�.•R'??:\• �''�'\ .'�.• .�i�:: �. tet."@\y '�.y �... : 21 RIDGEGATE DR HAWTHORNE BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD 25 32 25 22 VIA VICENTE/CALLE ENTRADERO PALOS VERDES DR W PALOS VERDES DR W 35 36 35 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED TRUCK SPEED ZONE ON DESCENDING GRADES 23 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 25 44 40 • 24 HAWTHORNE BLVD RHONE DR PALOS VERDES DR W 25 40 35 REDUCED SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMITS 25 BAYEND DR GENERAL ST CRESTWOOD ST 15 N/A 15 * clui 26 CRESTWOOD ST UPLAND ST BAYEND DR 15 N/A 15 fi cn 27 GENERAL ST CRESTWOOD ST BAYEND DR 15 N/A 15 *See"Segments with Special Conditions"Section for Comments 00 N ZJJ CD O_ C O Z O N O 00 m x 0 D Engineering and Traffic Survey 9 City of Rancho Palos Verdes SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour(mph) or more below the critical speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Each segment is discussed below. Segment#13— Hawthorne Boulevard— Highridge Road to Indian Peak Road This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 34,599 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial and residential. The critical speed is 46 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves and moderate bicyclist traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment#14-Hawthorne Boulevard-Silver Spur Road to Rolling Hills Estates City Limit This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 25,222 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and a high school. The critical speed is 52mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity among adjacent street segments,a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons. Segment#17—Miraleste Drive--Via Colinita to Los Angeles County Boundary This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 12,371 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal and vertical curves, moderate bicyclist traffic and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity among adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment#20- Palos Verdes Drive South - 1,500' EIO Seacove Drive to 1,300' W/O Schooner Drive This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 12,201 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and undeveloped land. The critical speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, vertical curves, moderate bicyclist traffic and a steep downgrade that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Engineering and Traffic Survey 10 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 12 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A Segment#21 — Ridgegate Drive- Hawthorne Boulevard to Highridge Road This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,721 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is multi-unit residential. The critical speed is 32 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, a vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 25 mph for the above reasons. Segment#23—Hawthorne Boulevard—Silver Spur Road to Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary(Truck Speed Zone) Section 22407 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit for trucks on downgrades based on the finding of an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The CA MUTCD specifies the requirement for an Engineering and Traffic Survey for truck speed zones on descending grades in Section 28.13: the segment should have a recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles;a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs or more will be provided.This segment is currently posted at 25 mph for the truck speed zone and has two through lane in each direction separated by a raised median with an ADT of 125,222 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential with Palos Verdes Peninsula High School at Silver Spur Road. Between the subject limits,the vertical downgrade to the south rages from 1.5%-5.5%. The survey was originally initiated in 2006 by a serious accident involving a commercial vehicle losing control in the northbound direction within the subject limits. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, a vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit for the northbound direction be posted at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #24 — Hawthorne Boulevard — Rhone Drive to Palos Verdes Drive West (Truck Speed Zone) Section 22407 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit for trucks on downgrades based on the finding of an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The CA MUTCD specifies the requirement for an Engineering and Traffic Survey for truck speed zones on descending grades in Section 28.13: the segment should have a recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles;a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs or more will be provided.This segment is currently posted at 25 mph for the truck speed zone and has two through lane and a bicycle lane in each direction separated by a raised median with an ADT of 16,241 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential with Ryan Park, City hall and the commercial development near Palos Verdes Drive West. Between the subject limits,the vertical downgrade to the south rages Engineering and Traffic Survey 11 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 13 of 82 Resolution No.2014-48, Exhibit A from 2%-9%. The survey was originally initiated in 2007 by a serious accident involving a commercial vehicle losing control in the southbound direction within the subject limits. The critical speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, a vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian and bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit for the southbound direction be posted at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment#25-Bayend Drive-General Street to Crestwood Street(Reduced School Zone) This segment is currently posted at 15 mph for the reduced school zone and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 934 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code(CVC)allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit near schools to 15 miles per hour for a distance of less than 500 feet from or passing a school building or ground. This can be applied if the segment has two traffic lanes; a maximum posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour immediately prior to and after the school zone and is located within a residential area. Furthermore the CA MUTCD states the 85th percentile speed is not used to set the reduced or extended school speed limit. Since this segment has two traffic lanes, is located in a residential neighborhood and has a posted 25 mph speed limit prior to and after the school zone it qualifies for the reduced speed in school zone. Furthermore there is moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers,and a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the reduced speeds in school zones remain at 15 mph for the above reasons. Segment#26-Crestwood Street-Upland Street to Bayend Drive(Reduced School Zone) This segment is currently posted at 15 mph for the reduced school zone and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,460 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code(CVC)allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit near schools to 15 miles per hour for a distance of less than 500 feet from or passing a school building or ground. This can be applied if the segment has two traffic lanes; a maximum posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour immediately prior to and after the school zone and is located within a residential area. Furthermore the CA MUTCD states the 85th percentile speed is not used to set the reduced or extended school speed limit. Since this segment has two traffic lanes, is located in a residential neighborhood and has a posted 25 mph speed limit prior to and after the school zone it qualifies for the reduced speed in school zone. Furthermore there is moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the reduced speeds in school zones remain at 15 mph for the above reasons. Engineering and Traffic Survey 12 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 14 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A Segment#27-General Street-Crestwood Street to Bayend Drive(Reduced School Zone) This segment is currently posted at 15 mph for the reduced school zone and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,768 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code(CVC)allows local agencies to reduce the speed limit near schools to 15 miles per hour for a distance of less than 500 feet from or passing a school building or ground. This can be applied if the segment has two traffic lanes; a maximum posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour immediately prior to and after the school zone and is located within a residential area. Furthermore the CA MUTCD states the 85th percentile speed is not used to set the reduced or extended school speed limit. Since this segment has two traffic lanes, is located in a residential neighborhood and has a posted 25 mph speed limit prior to and after the school zone it qualifies for the reduced speed in school zone. Furthermore there is moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the reduced speeds in school zones remain at 15 mph for the above reasons. Engineering and Traffic Survey 13 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 15 of 82 Resolution No.2014-48, Exhibit A LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code: Section 627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey,"as used in this code,means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records. (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs(1)to(3), inclusive,of subdivision (b)may consider all of the following: (1) Residential density,if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district: a. Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures. b. Upon both sides of the highway,collectively,within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. c. The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A)or(B). (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Basic Speed Law 22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. Speed Law Violations Section 22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant Engineering and Traffic Survey 14 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 16 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing. Prima Facie Speed Limits Section 22352. (a) The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof: (1) Fifteen miles per hour: A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. B) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways,except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. C) On any alley. (2) Twenty-five miles per hour: A) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard"SCHOOL"warning sign,while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph,standard"SCHOOL"warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C)When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR"warning sign.A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented.A local authority may,however,utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs. (b) This section shall become operative on March 1, 2001. Engineering and Traffic Survey 15 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 17 of 82 Resolution No.2014-48, Exhibit A Increase of Local Speed Limits to 65 Miles Per Hour Section 22357. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour,the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30,35,40,45,50,55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25 mile per hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366. Decrease of Local Limits Near Schools or Senior Centers Section 22358.4 (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a)of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe,the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour,whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey. (2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows: (A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period.The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour. (B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower,when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, Engineering and Traffic Survey 16 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 18 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period.The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions: (A) A maximum of two traffic lanes. (B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone. (3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel. (4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration. (5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds. (D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision. Downward Speed Zoning Section 22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width,curvature,grade and surface conditions,or any other condition readily apparent to a driver,in the absence of other factors,would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions. Boundary Line Streets Section 22359. Engineering and Traffic Survey 17 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 19 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions. Decreasing Truck Speed Limits Section 22407 Whenever the Department of Transportation or local authority determines upon the basis of engineering studies and a traffic survey that the speed of 55 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe for vehicles mentioned in subdivision (a) of Section 22406 which have a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or more, in descending a grade upon any portion of a highway, the department or local authority, with respect to highways under their respective jurisdiction, may determine and declare a speed limit of 50,45,40,35,30,25 or 20 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared speed limit shall be effective for such vehicles when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway. Speed Trap Prohibition Section 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speedtrap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code. Speed Trap Section 40802. (a) A"speed trap" is either of the following: (1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A)of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a)of Section 22352,or established under Section 22354,22357,22358,or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation,and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b)(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage and federal-aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration, except that when these maps have not been submitted, or when the street or road is not shown on the maps, a "local street or road" means a street or road that primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions: Engineering and Traffic Survey 18 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 20 of 82 Resolution No.2014-48, Exhibit A (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet. (B) Not more than one-half mile of a uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. (2) For purposes of this section"school zone"means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL"warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone"also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence,gate,or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL"warning sign. (c)(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph(2)of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable: (A) When radar is used,the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C)(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B)of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear,the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406. (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration,and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2) A"speed trap"is either of the following: (A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph(A)of paragraph Engineering and Traffic Survey 19 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 21 of 82 Resolution No.2014-48, Exhibit A (2)of subdivision(a)of Section 22352,or established under Section 22354,22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods,prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects: (I) Except as specified in subclause (11), seven years. (11) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation,and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width,or traffic volume, 10 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. Speed Trap Evidence Section 40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speedtrap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph(2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802. (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2)of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph(2)of subdivision (a)of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802. N NNW Engineering and Traffic Survey 20 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 22 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A APPENDIX A Street Segment Data Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 23 of 82 Resolution No.2014-48, Exhibit A Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CRENSHAW BLVD LIMITS: SEA CREST DR TO CREST RD City of Rancho Palos Verdes / ,•..�...,. DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: ,� MAP SYMBOLS r 0 Vs SCHOOL a i E 1, p cod sir+ co U 40 410, R1.1 n • TRAFFIC SIGNAL �' G css�a II R1-1 `� R1-1 % R1-1 STOP SIGN t., 40 ID R2-1 SPEED SIGN ark A/ Cl a ea 0. S SCHOOL CROSSWALK A. St.John Fischer v-.7 ii,/.0, „6- CROSSWALK ., ii Del Cerro ¢)-\ Park 1 ° \-.7 PARK it $ Seacrest Dr N.T.S. CD a CO CD i " DISTANCE 0.4 miles a o ALIGNMENT 1 Rolling with horizontal curve. ec N t PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides. - a STREET WIDTH 38'-64' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction.Raised center median between Crest Rd and Valley View Rd,changing to skip yellow centerline. x N IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete or asphalt sidewalk on both sides.Concrete or AC C&G on both sides. 0 0 FRONTING DEVELOPMENT W/S is a backup residential,view area and a park. E/S is backup residential, undeveloped,with church and school at Crest Dr. .t: Z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1,742(October 2012) 0 N.) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 27,2012. Midblock of San Clemente and Seacrest Dr. 0 itt AVERAGE SPEED: 37 MPH 1 CRITICAL SPEED: 41 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 32-41 MPH °° 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA:1/1/08 to 12/31/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 1 NO.WlSPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 I HBD,DRUNK,H&R: 0 • m ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES .c EXISTING SPEED ZONE-40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE-40 MPH ," The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph COMMENTS for the above reason. - Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CRENSHAW BLVD LIMITS: CREST RD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT (RHE) ---, City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: R ,,,-----i„v ..._, _,,,----- •-...,l-m,'" '4,7,7 MAP SYMBOLS Crestridge Rd RPV Preschool _........_ and Kindergarden S SCHOOL Palos Verdes Art Center JO 'PCs II 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL Or 0 Arair •46. -Pc" E , R1-1 ID R1-1 STOP SIGN ti c,..i. Gee 41Pr 45 R2-1 SPEED SIGN x\e,,rt \'16 4.1wAir c: \ .§0 S SCHOOL CROSSWALK Crfr., 113 ,,cco9 - Alki)ill?Q:.‘Ti CROSSWALK \ q-.- t,..-s ch /?7-7 A1100' id? LI 1141$ .1*. ,lisY77 (Doie po in meubdian)sted Co '7 00 1 " DISTANCE 0.8 miles 0 co ALIGNMENT Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade to the north. . r") ! PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides, except for west-side between Silver Spur Rd and Crestridge Rd. S STREET WIDTH 82 u, NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes in each direction with a median. NIB direction at a lower elevation than the S/B direction between Crest Rd and Crestridge Rd. Lli 3o -43 IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on E/S. Sidewalk on W/S between Crest Rd and Indian Peak Rd. 0 i FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped and backup residential. Preschool on SAN corner at Indian Peak Rd.Art Center on S/W corner at Crestridge Rd. p 6 D z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 20,473(September 2012) ,.., 9 i.) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012. Midblock of Crest Rd. and Crestridge Rd. t3 CD LQ -1,- AVERAGE SPEED: 42 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 47 MPH I 10 MILE PACE: 39-48 MPH _i. co -m 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC. 2 NO.W/SPEEDING 2 PREDOMINATE 0 HBD, DRUNK,H&R 0 ' 6 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.11 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES 6' EXISTING SPEED ZONE -45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH ..9 E.? The 85th percentile speed is 47 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph COMMENTS for for the above reasons 0 z Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CREST RD LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BLVD TO CRENSHAW BLVD City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: . ._,..„......_ MAP SYMBOLS 0 n SCHOOL roS Cresta Verde Dr al .?›\- Isz 1 111 R1-1 4v1 . 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL .._, 4Z- Crest Rd — I a, . , 1 Company 0/4511:5) ; Water rAR1-1 --ir ......... I R1-1 Brilla - R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN 454 '4. R1-1 g (T3 0 Ili> - r R1-1 ril Z R1-4, R1-1 1611 R1-1 45 R2-1 SPEED SIGN S -D > SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK (1) 40 V CA(5\----4--: ,,f40 -I.- .........__. 1 101 R1 1- cr, CROSSWALK R1R1-1 m o -1 \ co CD .. it 0 0 c 2 ... 40 lib W13-1 SPEED WARNING saS 0 1 SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN ra -c- 0 "' kP CD q NTS Q.) a- ,t5 (0 a) . DISTANCE cy) 1.6 miles 03 ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. 22 (., N) PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Stopping Anytime on both sides, Hawthorne Blvd to Crenshaw Blvd. . z STREET WIDTH 80' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes and bike lanes in each direction separated by a raised center median; numerous turn pockets. L, 7J , IMPROVEMENTS (SW C&G) Concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter on both sides. w O . ,-. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential, undeveloped; Commercial on SAN corner of Whitley Collins Dr,; Calif. Water Co E/O Highridge Rd on N/S. -• 5 i3 z• AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 10,368 (September 25,2012) , P m SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012. At Whitley Collins Dr. cp . -I AVERAGE SPEED: 47 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 47 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 43-52 MPH .i.. > CO or - 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC 0 NO.W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBD,DRUNK, H&R 0 1 -%f rn x - _ '& ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES 2 .., - 0 > EXISTING SPEED ZONE-45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 45 MPH :11 2 The 85th percentile speed is 47 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph 3 COMMENTS for the above reasons. z z .............. Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CREST RD LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR EAST TO GANADO DR City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: , ..., 1 _.....i MAP SYMBOLS Marymount SCHOOL II College School Zone 4\ 25 R1-1 Os 44N n 0....411Np. Mira Catalina 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL VII Elementary School CP t‘i R1-1 0 R1-1 STOP SIGN 101 ,( 349 CO 45 , ete (1/R1-1 ., 45 Itio R2-1 SPEED SIGN 1?0, LLic."11111111ftriey our R1 S SCHOOL CROSSWALK -1. Adar a , \45 25 . 2 CROSSWALK IVR1-1 q,,.. L.. 30 IfP W13-1 SPEED WARNING SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN Ocy 4sp •>6)4 • Iiii --z -0 L co . --a DISTANCE -,1 0.8 miles o c, ALIGNMENT Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. 1,4 r\.) -- -ti 4- PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides. 0 15, STREET WIDTH 64' ..,3 NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes in each direction separated by double yellow centerline. (r, IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Sidewalk on the MS b/t Lucania Dr and Ganado Dr and on E/S b/t PVDE and Starline Dr. o t E -. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup and fronting residential on the E/S. Undeveloped, backup residential and school on the W/S. a Z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 3,047 (September 2012) C\J 0 1\) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012. Midblock of Decania Dr. and Deluna Dr. o - — i - -1' AVERAGE SPEED: 38 MPH I r-FRITIrAL SEED: 44 MPH 10 MiLE PACE: 34-43 MPH L.2....... 00 rn 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC. 1 NO.WISPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE HIT OBJECT HBD, DRUNK,H&R: 0 4 ' ACCIDENT RATE: 0.37 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES '-)- > EXISTING SPEED ZONE - 45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH 2 The 85th percentile speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph 3 COMMENTS for the above reason 0. a z 4............... Traffic Enginf4Pring Survey STREET: CREST RD LIMITS: GANADO DR TO ROLLING HILLS CITY BOUNDARY N OF PASEO DE PINO City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANPqsA MI No7 SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS 1 1 4 t, t.i I R1-1 a0) \ , i [SI SCHOOL 4- 0 Radar Towers ‘i , TRAFFIC SIGNAL 40 -,. (gate) c, a 0 , 40 (gate) R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN oe tikOsz ,..,•,‘-‘o RPv F; 6e vl 40 R2-1 SPEED SIGN •dz c'zse° c J 0 30 ..:, S SCHOOL CROSSWALK '4.„„, -(5 140 ± CROSSWALK l (gate) . - , W13-1 SPEED WARNING I 130 R1-1 SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN 111 crest gd :z---- -- 30 b 13 4)- a) . 0 -0 co : 0 CD DISTANCE 0.8 miles o ALIGNMENT Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. N.) i PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Stopping Any Time on both sides from 200 ft N/O Ganado Dr to north city limit. STREET WIDTH 30 -52' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes in each direction to 200 ft N/O Ganado Dr,then one lane in each direction separated by RPM centerline. w tr, Concrete C&G on both sides from Ganado Dr.to Paseo De pino AC sidewalk on the W/S to 900 ft N/O Ganado Dr.AC berm on Zi (T) . IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) , SiS,edge of pavement on WS Paseo De Pino to RPV city limit. o - FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped and non-fronting residential.A few fronting residence at the northerly end of the segment. t 5 ci ,..4 z : AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 707(September 25, 2012) ,-, _ 0 r\) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012 1,500 ft north of Ganado Dr. III c) . -7 AVERAGE SPEED: 36 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 41 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 33-42 MPH .i. › a_ o 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to i2/31/10 TOTAL ACC' 0 NO,W/SPEEDING 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R 0 i * m ,...— x 0 ' ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES EXISTING SPEED ZONE-40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH :.-- 2 ,-. The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph '6- COMMENTS for the above reason 0 z limmawassassmitniumitmasmarientammisiO wir Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CRESTRIDGE RD LIMITS: CRENSHAW BLVD TO HIGHRIDGE RD City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS / SCHOOL Q a c., TRAFFIC SIGNAL / r., School Zone R1-1 0 R1-1 STOP SIGN *el a a 25 - -1 40 PO R2-1 SPEED SIGN R1 1 \R1Crestridge Rd Ilik 41* Palos Verdes S SCHOOL CROSSWALK \R1-1 401B Art School -0 R1-1 \ -, CROSSWALK '6 tP Ridgecrest Intermidiate a) School l .. T) 46- . cp 71, It! (0 0. NT (D I DISTANCE 0.5 miles 6' 0 -, co ALIGNMENT Rolling with slight horizontal curves. F N) ,, PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides. Red, white, blue curb marking in front of Peninsula Community Church. t STREET WIDTH 64' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction with a two-way left-turn lane. L.., .-- 2 IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on S/S, SW on N/S b/t Highridge Rd and 950 ft W/O Crenshaw Blvd. 0 '-i• --. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup school and assisted living. Intermittent religious and undeveloped lots. PV Art Center at Crenshaw Blvd. D C•J Z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,917(October 2012) . o - , N SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. Church in front of school. AVERAGE SPEED: 39 MPH IFT:-RITrAL SPEED. 43 MP' 1 D. , 1 10 MiLE PACE: 34-43 MPH .., ,-- -C-0 ,.. 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA' 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC. 4 NO W/SPEEDING• 1 PREDOMINATE. HIT OBJECT HBD, DRUNK, H&R 1 1 „,- in D- 5 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.06 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES .9- , ••••,,. > EXISTING SPEED ZONE -40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH a t-_ ..- The 85th percentile speed is 43 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit However, Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD (7; COMMENTS methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th I? c3 percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reason. z • -....-- immir -- Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: FORRESTAL DR LIMITS: PALOS VEDES DR SOUTH TO NORTH TERMINUS City City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25113 ENGINEER: VANESSA MNn7 SIGNATURE: ,...._ MAP SYMBOLS Ladara Linda Community n \ J Linda LaderaPark - 1 0 IQ Center and Montessori \f S SCHOOL . , Q. School of RPV a C.) TRAFFIC SIGNAL keNV R1-1 V' \ R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN Ocean Trails Dr sR1-1 ,c.o 135 ,ir o -• 3 _ 'E 35 6 R2-1 SPEED SIGN % c?, , I R1-1 R1-1 t --0... z S SCHOOL CROSSWALK R1-1 .- 0 Sc)./ , _ ,.. -o 6 CROSSWALK # r, Ca I • _S. .....,, SI) 59, (I, T2 ...:: T PARK co /ezensi 1E 1 ,.....- "sg 0 NIS a_ Ca ' (rD CD , (A) DISTANCE c) 0.3 miles --P, 0 1,.., co ALIGNMENT Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. 1\) 1 , PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides. -,5 STREET WIDTH 40' .k$ NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction; skip yellow centerline. w ... (an) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on the west side: none on the east side. w O . .• FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential on east side: Fronting residential N/0 PVDS and school/community center N/0 Pirate Dr on west side, ..›., 5 6 D N z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1,416(September 25, 2012) (.9 .._ 0 r\) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 27, 2012. Midblock of PVDS and Pirate Dr. ,(3 > 04 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 37 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 29-38 MPH _i. a) 1 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC. 1 NO.IN/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 ITI ..... x . ACCIDENT RATE: 2.15 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES > EXISTING SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH .s., 16 The 85th percentile speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph COMMENTS for the above reason. ' i NEMIEMEMIMMINENEMOSIONEr ViEWERIEN,_______ ______ - ... Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: GRANVIA ALTAMIRA LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BL TO PALOS VERDES ESTATES CITY BOUNDARY City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VAN ESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: ,..: _.,--- \--:-------)-1 \-1,_,A---A-----k-->) ,/,' \ - , MAP SYMBOLS 2) 1111 SCHOOL , 'lot% il 7N T S C.) C .e Il - 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL a Ri-i 0 .. R1-1 le R1-1 STOP SIGN -11-11111 if R1-1 R1-1 inn , 35 le R2-1 SPEED SIGN • R1-11.111 R1-I S SCHOOL CROSSWALK . II 0 1 Gramila Martl‘ra R1-1 .49 lot 3 5 ED- CROSSWALK II l E o [ i --a Ricigegate Or I .E.' (0 E CD DISTANCE 0.2 miles --.T O -'3 op ALIGNMENT Downgrade to the north with horizontal curve. 2 N.) , PARKING RESTRICTIONS Yellow, Red, and Green curb on the east side. Red and Green curb on the west side. STREET STREET WIDTH 60'-64' .. NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction separated by a raised median from 280 ft to 700 ft N/O Hawthorne Blvd. Raised median from Moreno Dr to 70 ft. Li 30 t.'2 .15 ((In) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on both sides. w O . E t, . FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential. Commercial on both sides at Hawthorne Blvd. D c 4 Z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 9,402 (September 2012) O , . " SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012. 100 ft south of Moreno Dr. `5) cp v, -1"- AVERAGE SPEED: 34 MPH CRITICAL SPEED. 37 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 29-38 MPH , -IP -. Co - 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC. 0 NO.W/SPEEDING 0 PREDOMINATE 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R 0 4 m x Z3 - • ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES 12 0 -.,..- > EXISTING SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH .s2 r E The 85th percentile speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph COMMENTS for the above reason ci a z Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAVVTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR WEST TO VALLON DR City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: ---‘ \L-Acy Aik—A-3\1A ck MAP SYMBOLS 1.,.. Note : Hawthorne Blvd is ,i-- 1 .:. s SCHOOL6) considered a north/south .V ,,-, - 47 roadway for the purpose of c., TRAFFIC SIGNAL this study 41, R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN Wi 0, x i.: 0 45 . R2-1 SPEED SIGN . s 45 .411101 'al > i I SCHOOL CROSSWALK I, Scenic .2 -.1 N T S 9 x 1 a Ca96 ne V`16 Turn-Out CROSSWALK E. ...-----:- --0-- vi7 PARK City Hall > -aL W13-1 SPEED WARNING AIL. co 3 5 co I SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN R1-1 a) i 1%) DISTANCE 1.0 mile 1 I OD ALIGNMENT Horizontal curve with steep downgrade to the south. N.) 1 0, PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Parking Anytime on both sides. No Stopping Anytime at Via Rivera on w/s. 15 STREET WIDTH 80 -88' , 45 NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes and bike lane in each direction separated by a raised median. r 70 .iti VD) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides.SW on E/S b/t PVDW to 350'N/O Via Capri,W/S b/t PVDW and Via Rivera and 380'SIO Vallon Dr,both sides. 0 cr---1 FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential on W/S. Multi-unit on EIS Via Rivera. Non-fronting Civic and educational on E/S near CH. Commercial at PVDW. a 6 z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 15,265 (September 2012) P N.) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. City Hall driveway. G -I-' AVERAGE SPEED: 45 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 49 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 40-49 MPH _i. co -rn 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC. 2 NO.W/SPEEDING: 1 PREDOMINATE. HIT OBJECT HBD, DRUNK, H&R. 0 41 x 2-- ACCIDENT RATE: 0.12 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES 0- EXISTING SPEED ZONE-45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE-45 MPH 2 The 85th percentile speed is 49 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However,Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD COMMENTS methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th i percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason. , Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: VALLON DR TO CREST DR City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: j ,----:*,,. ... -- .,..: 4 MAP SYMBOLS Alta Vista Dr ..„..} Los Verdes Dr iii SCHOOL Los Verdes 40 R1-1 E Golf Course Truck 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 i a -, —. 25 Hawthorne Blvd 145 , R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN k 4400 , n - .-. 111/* N 4 45 R2-1 SPEED SIGN o /s) Robert rRyan 11#400, median R1-1t- tri,4 a le a Pak 0 Oc 4/11, iftt cb S SCHOOL CROSSWALK \ \f/ 04, oloc'e . -t, - ---"-- i On .......35 e CROSSWALK median ..,,,...k Op Vi PARK #AP median . . 40 (z) 1/4 0 3 ‘IF 40gL ,....t- r- - ---- -13 40 W13-1 SPEED WARNING NTS 5 a) SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN (a 4A a) 1 DISTANCE ! 1.0 mile .v O .4., CO ALIGNMENT Rolling with steep downgrade at south end of segment, Horizontal curves. i N) _ i PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Parking Anytime on both sides. STREET WIDTH 80' ...u, wo anes an. .1 e ane eac erection separate* sy a raise. meow, . t rest •• an• Oupree ir. NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN 7j Two lanes onl on each direction se•arated b raised median/median barrier bit Du eree Dr and Vallon Dr. 43 IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides.Continuous sidewalk on the MS and 115'S/0 Dupree Dr E/S at bus stop. Intermittent path on the E/S. Lis. o --. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential. Multi-unit residential S/0 Los Verdes Dr on the W/S. Commercial on the W/S at Crest Rd. i 3 D Z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 16,241(September 2012) ,N o — r•) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. Los Verdes Dr, '5) o La, --r-:. AVERAGE SPEED: 45 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 49 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 40-49 MPH t--- ./. _ 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 3 NO.W/SPEEDING' 1 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 1 i *- rn x / : -7 0- ACCIDENT RATE: 0.17 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES .9 c --, •=4: c., > EXISTING SPEED ZONE- 45 MPH 1 PROPOSED SPEED ZONE-45 MPH t The 85th percentile speed is 49 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However,option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD — I COMMENTS methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th ? percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason. L±" Ilowiroar mariffins, Arimmur Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: CREST RD TO EDINGHILL DR. ___ ................7 . — \ City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VAN ESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: 0iii.„4 ----- , Z._ MAP SYMBOLS Eding'ill Dr - (2 (.:.. giSCHOOL I CD CD = 0 <0,_ '1/6) CO 'P. t,- czo° 0 osi ,i wi- 4: , ,Nooc"e oiCli TRAFFIC SIGNAL a3w __ iii-i P.' 111 R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN Sr<Air (,) Hess 'c;6(> Park .A cs 45 le R2-1 SPEED SIGN 411 —41r- rp 4ir--- \JP_....,, A Ri-1 - w r:\ ..• 4/), S SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK ,Il _ .is , S? / _ --it. — —1,-- e- wi r) . (Postedin pi ---. ....4 Doverridoe r,) :E= 4"1,1 W PARK Z .....---.---4-3E-nne.— ..2 CL) , CO 10 CD t W DISTANCE 0.9 miles E 0 _ co ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. = N) 1 PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Parking Anytime on both sides. STREET WIDTH 80' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes and bike lane in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous turn pockets. xi .ki g)) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on both sides. ui o E :g 5 . FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped, backup single-family residential; multi-unit residential at Ocean Crest Dr on W/S. >, u- z z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 15,936 (September 2009) 0 r8 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2009. Indian Valley Road. t; .71 AVERAGE SPEED: 45 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 48 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 39-48 MPH co "rn 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12131/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 2 NO,W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 2 i * x — 0 0- a ACCIDENT RATE: 0.13 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES ('- _. > EXISTING SPEED ZONE-45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 45 MPH , e The 85th percentile speed is 48 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However,Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD 5 COMMENTS methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th .c.) :a percentile speed It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reason, -:,- ,,,, Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: EDDINGHILL DR. TO HIGHRIDGE RD. , s City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: t 1 MAP SYMBOLS II Granvia Altamira Note : Hawth6rne Blvd is San Nicholas Dr NI considered a north/south 11 SCHOOL 10 '9%, roadway for the purpose of .. ..) TRAFFIC SIGNAL III this study NTS It R1-1 ID R1-1 STOP SIGN c"'SA 1 0/-,?o ,./„ 117 (double posted in median) 0 45 le R2-1 SPEED SIGN C<\o, 4- , % ,,,,<6 Ridgegate Dr 7/5re 1. ... S SCHOOL CROSSWALK O . 4. V' 1' CROSSWALK 1 %*Ve;)41 064.00")410 . tr, \.113 PARK iiiii* *# 2 -o ----- a) (0 •Z'414* Seamount Dr 4 ' ) (D I (6.,) DISTANCE 0.8 miles g 0 00 ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. . N) i PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Parking Anytime on both sides. STREET WIDTH 80' .ks NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes and bike lane in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous turn pockets. x , 41 2 IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on both sides. u o a, Et, FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential. Commercial on W/S at Granvia Altamira. Hawthorne Frontage Rd located on the W/S S/0 Grayslake Rd. 5 6 D --- - cv Z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 18,944 (September 2012) 0 " SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. Mid-block between Granvia Altamira and San Nicolas Dr i c) • AVERAGE SPEED. 42 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 46 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 38-47 MPH GD .rn 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA' 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC' 5 NO W/SPEEDING 3 PREDOMINATE REAR END HBD, DRUNK, H&R' 0 i x .1) : ACCIDENT MILES —7. RATE: 0.30 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE — CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES 2 > EXISTING SPEED ZONE — 45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE — 45 MPH P_ The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph z-,3 COMMENTS for the above reason ari a z 2 ,..-- .....T...... 1 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD 411110111.11111101.111111111111111. ViriUM. LIMITS: HIGHRIDRGE RD. TO INDIAN PEAK RD. City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE4 ,---4- ft,— „.." 41 MAP SYMBOLS .,-6--- Is ai. 00\e Rlir_i .s.,_..._1 ......sn .0. .z, Note : Hawthorne Blvd is o re considered north/south i S SCHOOL b o o roadway for the purposes of r' - .-; . 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL ,z. R1-1 EP this study c, 0 cnsi) N:06 c, R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN Raven Spur I R-41-1-147/411110 I l/ 4' 40 R2-1 SPEED SIGN i 10 iik .—I III 'u2c .. S SCHOOL CROSSWALK I ,„.00 40 _.g *S 10 _..c' CROSSWALK 1 i ‘ca' (posted in median) '9 / Co g -,_ .._ 2i , 0 , o 1‘ ,,, NTS 73 43:/e? 0- 6) "P fj >,) (D2 a) (0 (D. 1 DISTANCE 0.4 miles g- 00 ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curve. . N.) PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Stopping Anytime on both sides. No Parking Anytime E/S. -ii 0 STREET WIDTH 80' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median. Bike route on both sides. 23 (7)1 IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete curb and gutter on both sides. Continuous sidewalk on the E/S: sidewalk on the w/s from Shorewood Rd to northerly. 4i o --. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup residential, Commercial at limits. Hawthorne frontage road on the MS bit Shorewood Rd. and Grayslake Rd. ,,... o D z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 34,599(September 2012) P r\.) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012. NUB- 100 ft north of Raven Spur Dr. S/B-50 ft south of Woodbrook Rd, 0 -7" AVERAGE SPEED: 43 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 46 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 38-47 MPH .i. r: CO 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 3 NO.W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: REAR END HBD. DRUNK, H&R: 0 m ,.._ x c-S 27 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.20 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CT EXISTING SPEED ZONE-40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -40 MPH .-g The 85th percentile speed is 46 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit, However,due to horizontal and vertical curves,and 5 COMMENTS moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers,a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at T 40 mph for the above reasons. '2 i ,-. 411111111111, Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CITY LIMIT City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE 0 ,,„---), - MAP SYMBOLS n SCHOOL 1 i 1 , r7; 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL ; School Zone Hawthorne Blvd 1 411 .... R1-1 le R1-1 STOP SIGN 6 1 25 -- - --- 45 ID c, 45 ., 45 ID R2-1 SPEED SIGN 4..§ Palos Verdes (,) i°' 25 , Peninsula HS j Trucks 0, 11110, , S SCHOOL CROSSWALK S RHE _--- 45\ / 11 CROSSWALK ...... ..., RPV 0 • 0,....... _ ...----- /1, / . eji .6> (3) .-,- vo : 25 . -66 t, / I 0. ' Trucks 45 , 1-) a) co (1),, 1 -(1,1 DISTANCE 0.9 miles . E 0 OD ALIGNMENT Horizontal curves with steep downgrade to the north. 0 NJ. PARKING .4- PARKING RESTRICTIONS EIS: No Stopping Any Time at Silver Spur. MS: No Stopping Any Time btwn N/0 Blackhorse and Silver Spur. STREET WIDTH 80' _c 4S NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous turn pockets. e. .2.! w IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides.W/S: SW from Silver Spur to 100 ft N/O Blackhorse. E/S: SW first 100 ft from Silver Spur to Blackhorse. w. o E t, --. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped land and back-up residential. High School on W/S at Silver Spur Rd 5 0 D z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 25,222 (September 2012) c., 0 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012. NIB-200 ft south of Blackhorse Rd. S/B-300 ft north of Blackhorse Rd. (5). t AVERAGE SPEED: 47 MPH -(;:1,--- CRITICAL SPEED: 52 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 42-51 MPH • .-. -rn 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA. 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 I TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 7 [ NO.W/SPEEDING 1 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBD, DRUNK, H&R 0 1 * x § ACCIDENT RATE: 0.28 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES - — t > EXISTING SPEED ZONE - 45 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE -45 MPH e The 85th percentile speed is 52 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However,due to horizontal curves,vertical curves, and COMMENTS moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons. AIM. Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: HIGHRIDGE RD ,L City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 LIMITS: HAVVTHORNE BLVD TO ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CITY BOUNDARY • ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ _.. SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS 1 2 ia: 1 gi SCHOOL 30 ea cn 476 E C:11. (/) II) '0 ,... CD C'TRAFFIC SIGNAL ct-6\ (L) CD , o .. Poc. , R1-1 6 R1-1 STOP SIGN 35 R2-1 SPEED SIGN \S\ Cfc-' I, I R1-1 ei it ir„........._ Rpv , RHE ----- R1-1 tri <, -----\\ R1-14 ,„ lirrN AIL- Plighridge Rd ---„,v111 ' S SCHOOL CROSSWALK ' Highridge Rd ....LLAN R1-1 fir sAur-JIL—:\6 R1-1 ..., / my ii...„4/R1-1 Ri_i ° 1 R1-1 t , „me _ r ico R1-1 Arwl/ g x ,... L.: CROSSWALK 1 R 1-1 V35 ---------.1 le ariVii. \ " rR1-1 1 S 1 n / R1-11 1 VoR1- 3510 (., .2 4, '' " 6'0 a) Ridgecrest Intermediate School \ ' 47 'i 7 sCa 3' I CD SA)0 DISTANCE 0.8 miles ' cf, o _. 0 3 ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. N) i PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Stopping Any Time on both sides. STREET WIDTH Varies from 54'to 80'. One lane in each direction,Separated by TWLTL with bike route,Armaga Springs Rd to south City limit. Separated by raised medians with its NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Bike lanes Hawthorne Blvd to City limit S/0 Peacock Ridge 7J ca os ta, (n IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete curb and gutter on both sides. Continuous concrete/asphalt sidewalk on both sides. 0 -,7 1 g FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Commercial at northern limits. Undeveloped, multi-residential frontage on both sides. Church N/O Peacock Ridge Rd on east side. :.:.'? O ' z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 8,749 (September 2012) (., O — N) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) i September 25, 2012. N/B-200 ft south of Hilltop Cir. S/B- 100 ft south of Ridgegate Dr. (0. il AVERAGE SPEED: 36 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 39 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 31-40 MPH .1.. , CO CC 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC:0 NO.W/SPEEDING. 0 PREDOMINATE: N/A HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 i rn x , 6 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES '-:' > EXISTING SPEED ZONE- 35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH g 2 The 85th percentile speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However.Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD COMMENTS . methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th i percentile speed. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason. P --,.......—o Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: MIRALESTE DR LIMITS: PALO_IrSV_ ERDES DRIVE EAST TO VIA COLINITA City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURER1I : j -----A_H---,, MAP SYMBOLS Nancy Rd ' h Line ___ _____ Matc —— . n SCHOOL 0 t‘'` vOeste 9 r- "na E 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL /.\--:-.---:5.b).Via"1Roll:iin\ila R1-1 -5 o -111L ct) , R1-1 ID R1-1 STOP SIGN ...s.--) R1-1 R1-1 'ail- 2514 )i. 13 35 le R2-1 SPEED SIGN 1111 AIL 3511.la R11 R1-1 111 (t). - On center ...S- parkway (., ci ().%) S SCHOOL CROSSWALK a) ..., 4 AT:6:116-1\35R1-1 CROSSWALK T <0 co (Z) (li -`,-- N Q 75) ,53 .) R1-1 m -*5 ', 25 Ili, W13-1 SPEED WARNING ,-,- to 5 SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN -- co CO NTS ----- - Match Line > a ai 1 DISTANCE 0.6 miles 0 ' ALIGNMENT 037 ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. E N.. i PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides, except for limited red curb at Via Bramante and Via Colinita. .7 — i STREET WIDTH Varies from 28 to 32 ft per direction of travel. E/B direction at higher elevation than W/B direction. ,,, NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction separated by a center parkway, except for two lanes eastbound from PVDE to Via Bramante. LI ,--- .-, 'up) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete or AC curb on outside of lanes; limited amount of curb on inside (parkway)side. o v E .t, -. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Commercial development and fire station at PVDE. Residential frontage on both sides, 6 i3 D <,4 z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,352 (September 2012) o c, o --< 1\.) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012 E/B-4064 Mireleste Dr. W/B-4031 Mireleste Dr. D 4' AVERAGF SPEED: 35 MPH I CRITICAL SPEED: 38 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 30-39 MPH _i. I _ CO 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA. 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC- 4 NO W/SPEEDING' 3 PREDOMINATE. REAR END HBD, DRUNK, H&R. 0 i x 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.96 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES cr CALTRANS AVERAGE:2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES -9- ---', > EXISTING SPEED ZONE- 35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH r_ ,-- The 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However,Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD 5 COMMENTS methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th ? percentile speed It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason z Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: MIRALESTE DR City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 LIMITS: VIA COLINITA TO LOS ANGELES CITY BOUNDARY ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: ,,,-- , 7- ,..,1.., I . I MAP SYMBOLS ) . m cs-,1 SCHOOL g 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL . V-e -.E-5 (..) 03 .s-• (7; ,.. , 7 R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN ... R1-1 ... ______....... ii 35 R2-1 SPEED SIGN RI-1-1r 3 -- 5 R1-1-4,..... ----,1-4)/:)-tj----.. -ir --a a .........._.......-- -0-- (1) R1-1 0, S SCHOOL CROSSWALK _AL 35 k. R1-1 ...: R1-1 Suana Dr 'E - CROSSWALK R1 1 .-e‘ 35 ID `-.5 Chandeleur Dr .2 4 . -ID --------i- 6' ea Ca N TS ';2- CD CD..4 DISTANCE 0.6 miles O li co ALIGNMENT Downgrade to the south with horizontal curves. T2 ry 1 PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides except for No Stopping Any Time from 1st St to 405 ft south. STREET WIDTH Varies from 66to 70' 2 ..1 NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction with TWLTL. Bike lane from City limit to 450 ft S/O 1st St on E/S;to N/0 Rich Ln on W/S. w x . (1) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Via Colinita to 1st St; W/S edge of pavement, E/S C&G. 1st St to Chandeleur Dr; W/S C&G w/SW, E/S edge of pavement and AC. all O . FRONTING DEVELOPMENT '5 Single and multi-unit residential, ›, z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 12,371 (September 2012) . r8 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. 4405 Miraleste Dr. >3 0 r. AVERAGE SPEED: 37 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 40 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 33-42 MPH _r.. 00 - 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 1 NO,W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: OTHER HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 1 m * _ x i: ACCIDENT ACCIDENT RATE. 0.12 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES 1 CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES : > EXISTING SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH .2 1-2 ...----..._ The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However,due to horizontal and vertical curves,and COMMENTS moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments,a lower speed ? 0 limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. z I ..... Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: MONTEMALAGA DR LIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO PALOS VERDES ESTATES CITY BOUNDARY City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: ' ) • MAP SYMBOLS \ SCHOOL 1 cs) L... = E a CD TRAFFIC SIGNAL I 'i ct (2) o . n Silver Spur ci) ,... t w R1-1 10 R1-1 STOP SIGN 1 0- -ac .47 (/; 7 Elementary School w t ,.., z. 1 Montemataga Dr R1-1 35 le R2-1 SPEED SIGN r- R1-1111 i5 cr, S SCHOOL CROSSWALK -11rvilii.O\R i VIIIIS 1"- 63 ul'> JO-- ____. CROSSWALK......... ci.\cL'o R1111111-1 Ipso. R1-1 \ ' D 6. ED a. . cn 42: DISTANCE 0.7 miles -e; O t I" CO ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. 3 1 00 PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides. .,._ STREET WIDTH 64' u).E 45 NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane and one bike lane in each direction separated by a raised center median. Li 7) , (i) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) .. Concrete C&G on both sides.SW on S/S btwn Silver Spur and 50'W/0 Basswood and on N/S btwn Basswood and 1,200'W/O Grayslake. w 0 E. :0 -.... FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Backup and fronting residential on S/S, E/O Basswood Ave. Undeveloped and frontage road on S/S, W/O Basswood. ,.. o 6- D eN z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,765 (September 2012) O - N SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. E/B- 5442 Montemalaga Dr. W/B-across from 5400 Montemalaga Dr. _ AVERAGE_iSPEED. 36 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 39 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 32-41 MPH ,- (3. 03 - m3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC. 1 NO.W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE. HIT OBJECT HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 1 i • ACCIDENT RATE. 0.19 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES .-.--. _ EXISTING SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH 2 The 85th percentile speeds is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit However, Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD 3 COMMENTS methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th 0 1 a percentile speed,a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason. z Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: PALOS VERDES DR S LIMITS: 1,300 FT W/O SCHOONER DR TO LOS ANGELES CITY LIMIT City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS 1/4 0 -<\ cz ey 6 0, SCHOOL R1-1 c5' a 0 • 0 0 440 >> R11 <), 05 -TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 -111F- --e— Seacliff Dr R1-1-7os VerdsecseDnirc - - R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN 14. 111111I ' R1-1 scenic - 40 le R2-1 SPEED SIGN turn out _111... 11:140 1\:Z1-1 R1-1 ra/os Verd 2- S SCHOOL CROSSWALK 40 es Dr East turn out - p / 71 CROSSWALK rt?,-<',4(t -outh E As >, (z) _ rz, c) /i)ot„ 0 wk i 6-- 0) NTS (Jo 0 of. § 0:. . DISTANCE 1.57 miles o .. ALIGNMENT Rolling with Horizontal curves. PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Stopping Anytime on both sides, except for scenic view turn outs with designated time limit parking. Varies from 15 to 20 ft on N/S,varies from 15 ftto 22 ft on S/S in areas divided by raised median per direction of travel.Varies 48 to 50 ft on STREET WIDTH areas with no raised median. One lane with bike lanes in each direction with a median; 1,300 ft W/O Schooner to La Rotonda Dr. One lane with bike lanes in each direction • NO. (JF LANES AND MEDIAN devided by double yellow line; La Rotonda Dr to east city limit. 7zi IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) AC curb on both sides; 1,300 ft W/O Schooner to Forrestal Dr. Concrete C&G with intermittent dirt sidewalk on both sides; Forrestal Dr to w o east ci limit. ? E t, --- FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped and backup residential. Golf course on S/S of PVDS. 3 z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 14,150 (September 2012) - o '8 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012. E/B-200 ft west of Conqueror Dr. W/B- 100 ft east of Conqueror Dr. > .p. AVERAGE SPEED: 41 MPH jITITICAL_SF:)M: PH MPH 10 MILE PACE: 37-46 MPH 4,.. co . rTi 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC 6 NO,W/SPEEDING. 0 PREDOMINATE: HIT OBJECT HBD. DRUNK, H&R: 0 x D- : a, ACCIDENT RATE: 0.24 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.25 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES > EXISTING SPEED ZONE-40 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 40 MPH The 85th percentile speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However,Option 2 of the 2012 California MUTCD COMMENTS methodology for Engineering and Traffic Surveys is applied and the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. 14 Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: PALOS VERDES DR S LIMITS: 1,500 FT E/O SEA COVE DR TO 1,300 FT W/O SCHOONER DR „,.. City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: 4 , , --- _/ \--Dr\.: MAP SYMBOLS ...0 \ 0 o SCHOOL n ,.. 0 , ,.... c,,,s; s 4) cv...,' pa/os v , n, ..., tp TRAFFIC SIGNAL ,rues or s °Ifth 45 R1-1 R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN --ir R1-1 Palos Verdes Dr South k. _.. 35 te R2-1 SPEED SIGN R1-1 4510 o . 4° 35/4 "135 R1-1 7'35 o S SCHOOL CROSSWALK 0° o co ' 44 31-1 CROSSWALK ° .c o U, 13 ED (.0 NTS R1-1 8 as (Y) DISTANCE 1.44 miles I O v) .. ALIGNMENT Horizontal and vertical curves with a steep downgrade approx. 800 ft E/O Narcissa Dr c) > i PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Stopping Anytime on both sides. (.4 STREET WIDTH Varies from 30 to 32 ft in areas divided by raised median per direction of travel. Varies 35 to 36 ft in areas with no raised median. iS Two lanes with bike lanes in each direction with a median; Sea Cove Dr to Narcissa Dr. One lane with bike lanes in each direction divided by 45 NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN double ellow line; Narcissa Dr to 1,300 ft W/O Schooner Dr. 7:1 as w IMPROVEMENTS (SW, &G) Concrete C: on both sides;west limit to arcissa Dr.A berm on •oth si•es; Narcissa Dr to east limit. Intermittent o dirt sidewalk from west limit to east limit. 7, --. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped and backup residential. , 5 ."5 z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 12,201 (September 2012) (.4 O - r8 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012. South Bay Archery Club. AVERAGE -71 AVERAGE SPEED: 38 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 41 10 MILE PACE: 33-42 MPH .i. › , _.. . 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA. 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 7 NO W/SPEEDING. 2 PREDOMINATE HIT OBJECT HBD, DRUNK, H&R. 2 i ..t — x ‘§ ACCIDENT RATE. 0.37 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.25 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES .-c- EXISTING SPEED ZONE- 35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH e , The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit However,due to horizontal curves,vertical curves, a 3 COMMENTS steep downgrade.and moderate bicycle traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that c) i 0 the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons z ' --- - Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: RIDGEGATE DR LIMITS: HAWTHORNE BLVD TO HIGHRIDGE„.61:RD C i City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: s.____,,,,i ........,....,_ — 0 MAP SYMBOLS ,.., OA %?/;'0/° deNe• L9C0,1 'ft, \-.7 PARK 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1- R1\-, R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN liio,',90 'Pco 91. 0 25 . R2-1 SPEED SIGN o ,f. '9o,„ ' '.gate or ch x S SCHOOL CROSSWALK R1-1 \.e- 6)4' _r.,?1, 6 cr N •7 •d(r R:1 CROSSWALK R1-1 ;-.116., s 41 d 0 ,ItisiimmitiO4 -t...1 . ge • 1,. /yih --s-- ,77 R1-1\t 0 i ci) eve R1-1 (r) 1 NTS '?Ct \LI Mira Verde Pvt. Park . (D 1 . - DISTANCE 0.5 miles It O & .., ALIGNMENT Downgrade to the west at Hawthorne Blvd, Flat with horizontal curves between Ridgecove Ct and Highridge Rd. -. 1 PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking allowed on both sides, except for red curbs at intersections. Is • STREET WIDTH 40' 2 0 ...li NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction separated by a yellow skip centerline, with 4"white edge line. w m . • IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Sidewalk, concrete curb and gutter on both sides, O -N E 4 FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Multi-unit residential. >, C.) O cv z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1,721 (September 2012) c, O - r8 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 25, 2012. 100 ft west of Ridgebluff Ct. >3 w — ;----• AVERAGE SPEED: 28 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 32 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 23-32 MPH 7> OD cr 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC:0 NO.W/SPEEDING:0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBD, DRUNK, H&R:0 1 , x - 0 4; ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE:2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES -.- EXISTING SPEED ZONE - 25 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 25 MPH ,_-_- The 85th percentile speed is 32 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However,due to horizontal curves,vertical curves, COMMENTS , hidden driveways.and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers,a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended i that the speed limit remain at 25 mph for the above reasons. .. Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: VIA V10ENTE/CALLE ENTRADERO LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DR W TO PALOS VERDES DR W City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE. g \ ---- MAP SYMBOLS q.' i.. -------- 0 f:.3 di SCHOOL N Palos Verdes Drive West NI CD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1011 ,E), R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN NI 1111111111 ''' a,R1-1 35 .111-- 35 I. R2-1 SPEED SIGN o c . 35 A (3a) 0 c., a S SCHOOL CROSSWALK ea C1:3 ti,' Per hp . a, CROSSWALKpase- alle,p .S. R1-1 , ------------ark/ C cw/ Paraliek Parking Scenic Viento Turnout e .-1.1.,r Calle Vto cc co Turnout - t,---„ etc a. (t. DISTANCE 0.9 miles 1,2 Z o 5 OD ALIGNMENT Rolling with horizontal curves. r\) 1 PARKING RESTRICTIONS No parking allowed except in designated areas. STREET WIDTH Varies from 26'to 36' ,--., NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction. Raised center median entrance treatments at PVDW. Skipped yellow centerline. (-D (,) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides. Continuous sidewalk onW/S. Sidewalk on E/S between parallel parking areas. O -0' --. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped land on W/S. Backup residential on E/S. :'• a z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 297 (September 2012) o --, 18 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) September 26, 2012 1,200 ft north of Calle Viento ? -T" AVERAGE SPEED: 31 MPH CRITICAL SPEED: 36 MPH 10 MILE PACE: 28-37 MPH 03 a- -rn 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA. 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO.W/SPEEDING. 0 PREDOMINATE: 0 HBD, DRUNK,H&R:0 - -. ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES -9 > EXISTING SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH :15 The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph 5 COMMENTS for the above reason ° i 0 z Truck TrafficLIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO CHITawYthLoIrMnIeT8(ivRdHE) STREET: HAWTHORNE BLVD Engineering Survey ... ..„ City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS ‘ E a o 04 SCHOOL n , , , 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL ',School zone speed limit c., a. R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN 6 140\ 0 C , 45 R2-1 SPEED SIGN c3(4Palos Verdes 25 0 q e.c Peninsula HS Trucks Truck4s5us-e S SCHOOL CROSSWALK 4Runaway /-, R H E _.._._..._ ____ A \410 lower gear 1 , :•-i " 1.-.1 0 4IP -..........--- Truck Ramp ' /• CROSSWALK <1;1401r_. RPV ,,,,,• 112 mile 1 1// "I, I Vo , 1 So,‘ : Truck i‘ 'roe / / a. Ln 13 1 4511 - a) ( Trucks use Trucks use N Ts p lower gear lower gear a) 1 t DISTANCE .90 miles g- 0 co ALIGNMENT Horizontal curves with steep downgrade to the north. -i N) PARKING RESTRICTIONS E/S: No Stopping Any Time at Silver Spur and at Blackhorse. W/S: No Stopping Any Time btwn N/O Blackhorse and Silver Spur. STREET WIDTH Varies from 30 to 32 ft per direction of travel. 1.-- gks NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN Two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median; numerous turn pockets. w 7) . (t. ..1 w IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) . Concrete C&G on both sides. W/S: SW from Silver Spur to 100 ft N/O Blackhorse. E/S: SW first 100 ft from Silver Spur to Blackhorse. w o . E l' --. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Undeveloped land and back-up residential. High School on W/S at Silver Spur Rd. ..>-., o c) z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 25,222 (September 2012) 0 1 O Ir- II r8 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) October 15,2012 and October 16, 2012. 1000ft south of Blackhorse Rd, 4'.. AVERAGE TRUCK SPEED: 36 MPH i CRITICAL TRUCK SPEED: 44 MPH TRUCK 10 MILE PACE: 29-38 MPH co , m 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC. 0 NO,W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: N/A 1 HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 4 .4- x . - = • ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.6 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES — > EXISTING TRUCK SPEED ZONE -25 MPH PROPOSED TRUCK SPEED ZONE-40 MPH A.! 2 The 85th percentile truck speed is 44 mph in the northbound direction and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit However,due to COMMENTS horizontal curves,vertical curves,and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers,a lower speed limit is prudent It is recommended that the northbound truck speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reasons, z TRUCK TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SURVEY STREET: N/B HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: SILVER SPUR RD TO CITY LIMIT (RHE) CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DATE: 9/25/13 Q 900 • . I- ii ...,...i... ....„!....,., ..i....ems...4,...., .i. .......... I 4..1.i. 1111111111 ! ni .t.i t• ,, . im uriin: . . II . .• i I, miramillimmum....i.L.:-.--. 850111-1........ % ' ■■ {.r t.._... .... _r._....i. ......t...... 1 ; i._i•...• •I ..t.•... _.,........'.. '_ !1iI ' f iIll ' • 1 t HEIN ' e 1 t e . .. ,1- ..t.4..... ; 4...3 i : 5/0 : ......' i.... ...;...... Q • • is •,. 0 • '''"'"�� N i 411111111i. ' -i E t ! + E E i i } t i• ; : i i 1 i : i i 1 • •• • me i lii■ 5.5 . E �■■■■ ■ i - , �_ ' ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■r�■ i■■�t�■■'�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ • 750 • i UAIUUIINU..kut., ......1 : f•-1... ..1..UIHHHUAUPHIUHflIHflflflflUfl ■ ........... 3 , , • , �� ■■■■■■• �i■■■■■■■ ■■■■■11�■ 5o/ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■ • i■■■ ._ ._■■■■■■■ ■■ ■ • i c i r• • 1 H---t • • i S i. i. .. i..l.. ♦ _ .. {. 5...a.. y.i.... .. - i,i. i_-... l ._ ..i �..'. ,�.- r.i..» f. i .►. i f• 70__0__ .■ ■ ■ II., * lb._ i z ■ ■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■kE�,.; 5% ■� ■■■■■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■■ • ■ ■� RRR R ,„. _. • • i_., :Inn. ■ �:�' ' F ' } i o• ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■i■■■■ ■■■ 650 .„.•.•,. .. ■ '� t � ; 4/0, I ; L; • , , f � lIF, : . : • i.r.. 1111111111110111111MINN 1111111101111111M111111111111=1111111011111111111111011111 s ailiiiii....: .LAKINIMMOBIBIEUMIE annEINIIIIMMEMINI , • 600 ■r ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■lisi■■■■■■■ ■■■■ �.�— . 3% •• •: = co • ISERE : : j CN ....1., -...i.....j-•--i-... ........j......... _- 1._-__E.._-_1__.....-k... ■ ...2.......:.. .4...-•'♦--. _�y,.....h..--.._.�.... _...y'_....b... ..�._ ....j...-s-...., + �...............y...�.... .. .1-.-.Y__;.....1....,�......�...«-...i....3 ■ • l E '" c) H.... ; _ o CO `. i ■ ■■■■ i ■■._,....;..._j....,....° ■ •.5•.....a.. W E-........i.. •-•-w-4/o ----. ••••+--f-- CN > 550 : • .••. - E ' ' i ' i • -. ' I , ' i i ,, a) �i) ;, , ! E ' i U 1 f E _ > cp U i , i i • { • 500 ..__-_.-. i , .._.. • - }.... •r••4 .... a: i i E t s : f i , t _ ,..,..._.,. r:....t4..: .t..:_II.I.. 1 i 7 .....,.t..t_ ' t i E � i � � y _t... i j e - ' ii 2 2 ,'�• ! .; i.. : 3 l :-.-.4-•- , y ... i -- a .. E . .i.....r. • ....-.--�........-.... + r r-+-F-r ►.�.. -...♦ {..... _ t-- -. Lir ........; ...i..;.... p -.j... j }_... j.-w.. ii E : E �-I i i 1. t. • -1 ► f t ' f i f 1 i • i • , i 4 .-ij i i z r . i i j # i •,,-,E ' -L-, -.i... L. 4..i ..____,........ • • ..___L_ _..,L ' .I-, :-_ : .4..4„_ , i -!. .. i........4.... .4...•...... ;_, ; 1.......'... . -.-:i # 4...... in 2 i : :_t4_ .i.: .,—. F4: ..... 7 .i.,...." :4.1f.Ti_.L. i E1:1; E E I .. .........j.... .j.... EEE : ::: '11'I li . '..j... 400 3 1 �i tIH E .4.c.i : •...3._ ......,.t.j+ w 3 i 4 3 3 3 .Et t ..-_ E T �' : i 350 i E E E •• : .. •• i i-.+ r -- t a+ �- S • • • j ► ! i ri E i t ? i . 1 i i 1 i i i t- t 1 ► • ...,• ! a ♦.+. I..c.l.. ' i + E i i i i i } t- E s • ■ , „ „ , - ,------t--",---••,---1- *** *-t-, : - - ♦ 4-+---- �. w.,♦. i i.-:1---t-4 — i4....-4.....4-.Ii,.,,•,.,.,,. ♦.... ,.,._4. .1 J. .1: .....«•...•.•-•F--►......,•,„,.•a..-.j..... ..a_" -. ...r• j4--.+. 1 f•i• 0 i .. i ,• .,..i ..., ,..i.,.. _ ,.._, .,__....L._ ..., ...,.....•.-,- f. aJO V a.-'•--f-•.t•,. -•i• •+ 3 r---r- y. ..«.. ..-.s.. ...}-. .t. ..y.. .:E -"!_' •«- : ,:- , , ,, ,- . , , i i_, ii , , , , , i i ji T 1 t ' t 1 ', • 1 i— t t i ; ; i : • • _ : . • • i E : , , . 1 ---t , , • E ..• --t-T-rt---- 1 , i 4. I , i , , , , 1 , ; ii _ T" • .. ; �. ._....., 4.,... .....ti,•---•..,.;...... i ....-.,E.....j....}....{....♦-...j....... .. •.E....,...i..... _-- ... ....... «..., j . : �...-_{.....,....j..... }....i.E i i • 250T.............._.... . _ «i I....-...i .... ... .... .. • ;CL t E W 8 CD 0 O 0f Of 0 0 0 8` 0 0 = £• t 7 ac O O 0 0# O,e tJ C, D CI 0 CD D In o r o Y M r) V" v cn c.) m Station . ....... -... . - Truck Traffic STREET: HAVVTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: RHONE DR TO PALOS VERDES DRIVE WEST Engineering Survey -, ------- • ENGINEER• VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE• DATE- 9/25/13 City of Rancho Palos Verdes • • A....f.:1-- ivt---k-A---)\-\ I i , Truck 5 . ili-- 1, MAP SYMBOLS , Los Verdes Dr R1-1 1Y6 'P'„ PARK Trucks use, Oon E lower gear 4 *On 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL Alta Vista \iiiiroposow. InI R1-11 . Dupre Dr .: R1-1 R1-1 STOP SIGN g II\ 11 Robert Ryan ..s 4 1- ‘ .740 et VI V) 45 R2-1 SPEED SIGN > 4)7 o Park On . median 0 0 '74 45 45 0, S SCHOOL CROSSWALK co a) io 31 -t, 45 sk 0 D a) Truck 4410v5 "dgvScenic CROSSWALK > Via Capri Trucks use o . lo er gear W13-1 SPEED WARNING To 35 ne‘31\16 Turn-Out o 40 I SIGN WITH W1-1 SIGN a_ i-ia\t0(3r m- . ,.._ii_ Crestmont Ln NTS Cc CO . City Hall• R11 a) 4«) DISTANCE 2.57 miles gol o -5 03 ALIGNMENT Horizontal and vertical curves with steep downgrade S/B. a N) ..- PARKING RESTRICTIONS No Parking Anytime on both sides. No Stopping Anytime at Via Rivera on W/S. CNI . : STREET WIDTH t-- Two lanes and bike lane each direction separated by a raised median bit Rhone Dr and Dupree Dr Two lanes only on each direction separated by raised median/median 4 NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN barrier bit Dupree Dr and Vallon Dr.Two lanes and bike lane in each direction separated by raised median/rnedian barner bit Vallon Dr and PVDNW 70 r Concrete C&G on both sides Continuous sidewalk on theW/S and 115'SIO Dupree Dr E/S at bus stop,intermittent path on the EJS, 4 ((in) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete C&G on both sides.Sidewalk on EJS bit PVDW to 350'N/0 Via Capri,WS bit PVDW and Via Rivera and 380'S/0 Vallon Dr,both sides i.d O w E Backup residential,Multi-unit residential sio Los Verdes Dr on the W/S.Commercial on the W/S at Crest Rd -i- FFRONTING DEVELOPMENT >, _ 5 Backup residential on W/S,Multi-unit on E/S N/O Via Rivera.Non-fronting Civic and educational on E/S near CH,Commercial at PVDW. D z. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 16,241 (September 2012) O – N.) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) October 15, 2012 and October 16, 2012. 200 ft north of Dupre Dr. " c) — w AVERAGE TRUCK SPEED: 35 MPH CRITICAL TRUCK SPEED: 40 MPH TRUCK 10 MILE PACE: 31-40 MPH co . ii --Fri 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/010 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO.W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: N/A HBD, DRUNK. H&R. 0 - x • - g ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 1.60 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES i > EXISTING TRUCK SPEED ZONE-25 MPH PROPOSED TRUCK SPEED ZONE - 35 MPH ; The 85th percentile truck speed is 40 mph in the southbound direction and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit, However,due to – : COMMENTS 0 horizontal curves,vertical curves,moderate bicycle traffic,and a steep downgrade that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers,a lower speed limit is i 0 prudent. It is recommended that the southbound truck speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reasons. ..::__ c)r mediai . . TRUCK TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SURVEY STREET: S/B HAWTHORNE BLVD LIMITS: PALOS VERDES DRIVE WEST TO RHONE DR ............ CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DATE: 9/25/13 < . ... ......._. ............_ 4_, 900 - •- . } '4... .....'.......,-,....1".. ....1,.-..,,-. ........ ...*4- r--L_it, .- .144.L.f.4--.......: .i.: f. ..-. .Li..1.-1- 1 - i .1.44-: 1. :i-• -.44../. - 1../.. : ' ' '. i.1..4.. ._.1 i _ 1 4 .4 i .• .__ i.. I._.., x Li f.. t'-'• - • . , ; ,•-•-•+•.+-• I . • 4 t-t--- ......4_i 1. 1,-..t.-...r , t . t r t I : f T..t. , , ..f . _ ..f...t___ ..........t.... .............f.........,.....i.•............,.._ . LU ---- ..---' 4-4----+- - +, .t- ----,--- f --4 i 4 --;+•-+-f-i-. t i---; t : -f--t-i 1----t-----. --1..--- , _.t.,-.._..„. • . .. .. .......... 850 -.4.• •;-- ; 4.---1. 4...- 4. ...1.f 4. 4.4---4 4..L - ,. ...: 4..- ....L. • . :-4 -.i••,•.4.-,. 4 4••1 •••••••;• i•••• -I "- , : t3 , ! , , i , , , I I : , , 31 , 1 . 4 t , !' 4 i • f 4 141, t , ' 4 itT -T4-114Ittt4 t 41- tr- - I t 7 1 i f, - ± t 1 i t . -* i ' .1-_.-A. ' f.- + . 1••• : 4 t•-• ; t.±...-• . ;1 r 1-.--. r I I'1 1* , 6116., ..i..4..r.4o, ....4.........u..1........ -t...t.1-4. ._-.11-r.r.-!---.: _-t-rt t 14: ,._.._!. !. i - ...i. ....i.. . - co , f•+ f-t i• • • - •f• l• : - t-- in t .t.._...r__+_,....±..., i . L.....j........ft.: --ti-----1-- : .* 1 1 7-- i : ''i ' .i. f i- 1----t..' -4.- f i 4.- ----4. ••-•4,--: ,-- i - t-i Ei . t"''f' --1-"--i---r--•-4--,-* , , , , 3 • , •,-- CD c\J 800 , • . .t , I 4 . • ' • • E , I , i i . ' • 4 • 4 I i i E -• I i 1 ii ; 1,,, • • 1i. ' ', . - ! t ', . • • . , : . • : : . . •-4,--1-1-• -tr bort 30/ • ; .-f..-1- i- .--1.---t- -t t- , ,--,---t-,-- , rt.-t----r- , , , t , . ; ± tt t , ,: i 1 1. , ----, a --+-..-i ail c., z 0: 04 : ! t ... 4..t. 1. .t. , • i ...t- i ;••-• i• i• ; 4 •,--4- I- - .4- ' 4- 4-.+-- + • • t , -+. , c t. 1 .......i..1....i , 1. i..., 750 -f-4. - 7= b .....•: ..,. t.. .i. .1 .._4. i. f ,.. i .4..1 i.... 4. i. : .4...-.i. 1 --.•-•4 i- i -4- -4-- „ f --f .i. -------t-t.-1...r.-t- ----- -----+--r i • -t• ---- • •-t' • ; : , : • i i • , , • • , Lii - 14 ; •, ' W , III - ' ',. i t I - i ' i• i . • i 1 - i 1 1 iii ,- iit - . : 1111 --t i-I..t---- -4-- '•- -- -.4---- 1111 '- '--t--t----+ .---t-----ft-t-• -t ! t. t---- ,--- ,---ift--- "--r-----t t-t-f -- !-•-------r-- ---4 -r t ----t-f-f---- -t•-• -t--: in.--f-- - -- 0 ;i!. f ; -F- :•-+ 1- F.t t-- .i... t 1 +. ;4 : • i .t---4.- ; - •t---4--+:+- f -1:--4-• •-t----t --t-7----t: -------t--±--i 1 --t--- t---t-----1:--t:t•-•1-----t-t , ---4,:-:t::t• i . :•:-- e--:t i---t- t- •. • o ---r-i----t..-t-------f---t--t- --1...k.------f-- --f----4,-- , ,....4 a) 700 : L _1,_• : ..,..... . • • t f • t .-f. : i ----f- --f t-4.- 1-s •.-+ -f -t-f -± :,-f .-i-t-t ' -f-t-- -r-t. -i , f.t---,--f ,-. ,..,---t; , ,-----r-,1-1--- --1--1 f.-t - -t; 4- -f---. ' •-i-- . 1 ' ', I • i i I if , t , , , i . 1 f , 1 • '''', t-• ; ; t , : , +•••••• -4.-••t- 4 ; .;. :•• :. -.• i• .4''''"+-' 4 f-4-, 1-1.4. I ,_ -4-.••,.• . i •-t-- • i -'. - t -i----t--t- I I I _, i smi. i'-------i-i--1-i 1. 1 i 4 - ' ' ! ' ' : . -4-4.--, - ! •- ---± t I ---t •----,- --t-----±-.."'..i 1.-...1.^ , . i ..". . 11 .,„,..„_. IIIII i i i i 1_,.._ ...4....,_ F.4 111 t., .r..i ii_... I. i 44.: ..._+.1 , ._t. .t.-• •. i.t&...,,, .L.,.._..,_...r.1.1....i_i... ....t...._.............._i ..., • = : . . -.. 650 : • , ' i"f-t" ; -t-' .'-- -4- : : + - 4. ; 4 4-4 -4-, -, -+ . 3. ., : ; i i: ' i 4" i i .t.i. i ' i • 1 ' I i ' '.- ' ' . .:11, I .., ,, ...i.... .4_4_4 •4 ' 4 4 1, r 1 I , i , L•• , , • • :-,..-,'''. •••---4----4---+---+-4----.--:- ----4--- -I- i i ••-•4.4 -4- - i 4 -.--.4----4- . ' !-,,--4--1- ..-.---1- 4--4---I-4-4-f+ ..------'--f- -f-t-i • 1 , Mi • t . f r•--t- , , i • • .., Q-..:. 600 : : • - t-' 4 !- i-- +. : i - I-- -;- I -i- ' 4 4--; .t.• 1- , • ; • __L____ 1 ' • ' 1.__i_....1.-..4 ' . . .......,..2.1 _.,......,_ .... .... i tr----- --t- t---1 -i-- : 1 -i: ; --T--+i-• , -r---t -*-- . . . , : 4:.....F. ..1 '' t.' - '.. 4. f-.4 ...i.. ----.-±.--t ' I i. i---------+ : -....' i sr.+ -i-f ' fs ' t' 6....• c\I c i . - .. .i. i ; • . 4 t• i _ . . .i. . 4i , _ : . A . , i 4- ' • I 4 ' - i • i - i f - ii - j ! I -. 4- 1 , - . i ,- r j i 1 -'..- 4'.. - i 4 t.-1----1-, 1-f-t- -1---t-- -t-+ t-4--i----' • ' • • • 1- 1..T. - ....--4.. .... t 1 ' ' ' I Mill .., i_. , .4. • ,4- ma , , , , , , , , i , i : , 9%.; ti. f 41 1 r ..4aC..+D+_l,, .4i......, ...t:i...„4;':, 4i: 1 4+! +i-..4..i•I,--- - 111 4t:--.r.:.-....-.-H:.---•.-...4.:... -.4..-.- i 4,:..4,:..4,. : !.-.+4:...- •4• . • I! :11-1. i, 7,- 1',,7t-t1! 7If-1t _; _..4i1_11I _-1i= . --= 4 '- > 550 - '- 4-- 4--- i +- t + r --1 -i •,. L 1 4 , ii , iiii tt ' t, ,i-i i I -- • •• : . , , • ill ' I t , t ; 1 : : 1 ! -4- 1 • . . .• i• , ; •t• , : ,A : 1 , , , t •,--' -i--- --,--4 4-4 --.. -4-.4. 1- I--- 4 :.- I 't. + ' *t f • ! -t-t-- i. t 1 •-t* i t -i •I•I 1 F i 1* *- . , . -- - + i •--t..--I- !- ---{ -.4-- . , .........i..4. f_..1.±..4..-..+...... 4.+.....-. -t---_.-. : 1.- . --t--.. i .. .....-+.--f. -1- t---t-tot-±-i-t--t- t .-i- ±- . i - i ---1--f.---t-4---4-- . : . : • • . , i i : i if (t1 CI- ----4+4- -+4-4 - . H . f HI - i -4--i-----:--± It : 7 •-I - 7 , , ,, , , , i - , :. i.- • , .i.... : ---4-t .., : +4 -4_4 t t•-t 1. t.4.._.i. . t....4_._ i-......f......4.......4...i. II + .e.....i. - f._ ...., . ---4---4-..+---4-.4-4_4.- i 4.4.- ,, i 4--i. , 4 :. + 4------+-4 I- 4 1 ; -4 i - t i i : • 1... , ' _L.' , _J... ,*--t-t--!---T--- -I"1"---, , ; i - . iff f - 1 If ' : ,;_' ti Ot : f , • , , , , , ; , , I : ': .4, ......4..... .. ........,'......_..L. .. ...t...._. . ............; . 1 -t•*1-t I-4--t t 1' i -t- ! • , I i : i :_pi ___ : ,ri t_.....-.1.7.1,7•t• 7, t It 1. . a ti.,. ,, . •,- i 4 - • 4--- ' .4. . i.4.-.... ' i__.-...4.-.4..--.4.. .4. 4 4..-4. ' 4-4- .1 1-7'i t-'t t' Li- b,,--t- if I - -.17- - 4-4. :.--------- - . .: .÷.-. : ; , • : : . : : : : I ; ; : , : •. . : . . ! ..--..-i---. +... . : . • ..,z., Noon , +:i ...i..../............ ..... : im i...,........_..I • : . , , •....t... . . -70, ..!..... .. ;••4 ta 450 ..• •• • , 3 - 3 • • • . : i : ! ; 111 , : i ! i ! : ; , • „ . +-i- 4 4 i 4 • 4 4 . 4 4 . 4 3 4 . 4 4 4 i i 4 i :. . 4 4 i- i /° ! i i i i ; 4 . ! , I ! 3 . t . 41 4-i-4. • + : i i : i ! : ! i ! ! i ! : : i I _i , : ! , : , : : i : : ... '-4-4- ,-••• •--3 i 1. 1 •t.I.--1. 1.-.'-1 rt. -e--r---,-t--t•i•-• Ia., _ip T I :1-1•-•1 ----'•••t•1:•1_'-,' ':--t•H'i•-•• .1.71 T.---,H---f 1 _- . .t.1 , 1 , , .T..1 , ,,. kr - ! . idS ••f- f• t.• ! .4,--1 , -4 -i• i• • -,-4-----1•••• : •••••-..--t-t-t- - r- - 1- 1- r"*" T-1-t'-'4-+-t71-1--1 T--* t--7 t- : ' ;';*+--4 4.. •I; t I 4._4 4.. .. .4.4.4.'. I..f......4..........1.......... , 400 : • • 111111111MINININIIIIIIIMINIIIIIII 11101.11111111111111111111111 : ' . , , : • , : . , ..t 4. .i_t .....,... ...t.....f....t_tf........., : : : , • : , : 1 / 4., • - : • . : 2 o muniummiummaimmismminummommimmins moommilmnimi i ....i.. , I. . , , ._i lin! • 1 • : . , , • ..e. , ---- -----7 1 I ' -4- r 4-- --A •••I f 11 1 : ;•:. ''-;4-••-i : .-1------- -4 -t---t.--4--I----+---, : I- .4- -f----t.--4-44---td --t.-----t-4-- --f- H : - t f f ' +1 :--iiiiiiiii--.1-1-3-1--1-..-.1., . :4..•:: .1. i •••,.'+':-t. g ••-••-•'--.1-• ---4 1 .....-••,_+-+ ; 4 ,; - 4 4 t ----4 4- .• , ' . -4-- -+---4 i : ±;1---4----i t -i-• i : : 4. L : 4-t •-` t , • •, , a •••:, ....! . . • , : : • • : . . . . . 350 a I . -1-1-1 III- ..----t-..1.-f. .-f.. i..t., , a ,-•, , -t----t • . . . • • . . • . . , , , 'my, mousiummoommoisk:. , 70/0 1: : i 111M11111 .....'; Ems= • 111•1111111111 111111.11.1111111111111MIEM111111111111M111111111.1.111. . ;•.5 milmilill=ril Ream 1-t-1-71-1----. t-EMON=Massams===linammessimmiamismionwah.: l••T aim , r, •-÷ . : • 4 4--' -4- 4 f I -i• f 1 i t-L i 4- I=1 ni IN=lillimialM11111111111111111111.11: !- 11111111111M18111111:*?, . • ' 2% *- -:* - ; : • . . : • ! , :: i , ! : ! a ,„,„,,,,„,„„„„„w,„,,,„„,,„„ .i , ,. , : , ...: _,.....f.....t.•._.. 0 1111111M=11 i ENV Ilia : ' i . ill : : II OM 111111111111111=1111111111111011111111111111111101111111111111=10.11....i. ' i , , .4._....IRMBIMINII........; 4 i i 11111111.7. ',..... 50/o •-- • .I. I. ll .i. .-...f...t..t.t...,...i. e....t....... ‘ .t. ,-..•, I- i_cp,....- i,4..4_, ..._.„,.... .. ,, ,,..,.._:, . , :.. ..: .....,. : _ •....._.: , .. ...f.._,...,i..4....4...4.1 1..1;4 .1.•••... , 250 -1---F-4- ++4- -A-4-- • .-... --f---1----t-t.---.---t-t..1-------; . , -.1-.1.. --,-. --t- -.--i•-i--. : - ! i- -t•-i---t + , ÷-• i i E : : E E E E ' E ' . ' • . t•+-t-----f•----+.4 ••• f i-••j-i••*• I- E E i E E • . _, • • ----1---. ' ' . " I , I I I : . , I •;., CD 0 a 0 i 0 k._ 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 ' 1 C) , .s-.., CD 0 1 co 0 0 0 Q CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0, 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0c' 0 ) + + (i) + •••tt + + + + + + ..._ + + + + + + ' + T :•, ,c2 ', +: 'y 0 to (1) 0 .-1.2 Li) 0 0) 4) C) in 00 LO 0 it) 0 1.11 CD = LO 0 LO a a)0 0 0 13 ‘.•-• > ,-- CN 0 CNI CO CO ,:tNr Lo LU CO (.0 N CU 1"--- CO CO >CO (7) 0 357' I._ CI 0 > Station ,,,:. Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: BAYEND DR LIMITS: GENERAL ST TO CRESTWOOD ST City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS SYMBOLS n SCHOOL c<‘,;.1, R1-1kk 4\R1-1 4"15 1IrlkIIIIIIIIIIII TRAFFIC SIGNAL o R1-1 ID R1-1 STOP SIGNTo % Tv R1 1 Nki, - 1 , ,.. 1 le SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT 6 5 ASSEMBLY C (CA) 7)o (7, 1R1-1 ,3- S SCHOOL CROSSWALK R1-1 —\41 -6-a ,-1 V 157 CROSSWALK Crestwood Street OtikR1-1 Elementary Schoolts 1 cp ik A *4411r--'-'14.1*---NTs n . • DISTANCE .09 mile 1 o il • ALIGNMENT Horizontal curve. Oil Lil PARKING RESTRICTIONS None STREET WIDTH 36' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction divided by single broken yellow line. L, ., (u1)) IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk on both sides. 0 --. FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Residential, school on east side. .. 0 D ,,C,i Z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 934 (September 2012) .<N, 0 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) N/A 'r, -.-2 AVERAGE SPEED: N/A CRITICAL SPEED: N/A 10 MILE PACE: N/A . a. •• e, 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC. 0 NO,W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: N/A HBD, DRUNK, H&R 0 i _ x • 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES ..c., EXISTING SCHOOL SPEED ZONE- 15 MPH PROPOSED SCHOOL SPEED ZONE- 15 MPH .-(2 4--_ Per Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code(CVC) if the segments meets all of the following characteristics: has two traffic -,- COMMENTS lanes;a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour immediately prior to and after the school zone in a residential district it can be reduced to 15 mph. Since the segments meets all the characteristics, it is recommended that the reduced school zone speed limit remain at 15mph. Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: CRESTWOOD ST LIMITS: BAYEND DR TO UPLAND ST ., City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: „( ----) -------, s_, 'rNrk...c_A—A--,,, ,, .._,) MAP SYMBOLS b 10 el SCHOOL a) -, co -c-i. rzi 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1 1J Crestwood St j R1-1 R1-1 . R1-1 STOP SIGN —4,Aer el R1-1 _........2.1.0.........mmiumilm....._ 115 4 7R1-1 1 , Ito SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT -uuuu,I 15 ASSEMBLY C (CA) R1-1 eifiR1-1 15 ./ 1 R1-1 ip ovati_111/14, , S SCHOOL CROSSWALK Crestwood II oStreet R1-1 cf, CO CROSSWALK Elementary School i'lf 1 k., a) 2 co , -D C9 l'• 0) N T S (0 03 CD ---7-......... EP— DISTANCE .14 mile 0 co ALIGNMENT Horizontal curve. F NJ.. _ 1 PARKING RESTRICTIONS Parking restrictions and loading & unloading zone on south side STREET WIDTH 36' ..,,i NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction divided by single broken yellow line. w 7o a) tki w• IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C&G) Concrete curb&gutter on both sides. Sidewalk on south side. Sidewalk 375'west of Upland St on north side. w E 7i ---- FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Residential, school on south side z- 5 6 D cv z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1,460(September 2012) 18 SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) N/A '5) Ld AVERAGE SPEED: N/A , CRITICAL SPEED: N/A 10 MILE PACE: N/A .p. 03 cc .. 1 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC: 0 NO,W/SPEEDING: 0 ---T. PREDOMINATE. N/A HBD, DRUNK,H&R' 0 ..t M D- 7- ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES EXISTING SCHOOL SPEED ZONE - 15 MPH PROPOSED SCHOOL SPEED ZONE - 15 MPH Per Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code(CVC) if the segments meets all of the following characteristics: has two traffic COMMENTS lanes;a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour immediately prior to and after the school zone in a residential district it can be reduced to ? 15 mph. Since the segments meets all the characteristics, it is recommended that the reduced school zone speed limit remain at 15mph. ?- Traffic Engineering Survey STREET: GENERAL ST LIMITS: BAYEND DR TO CRESTWOOD ST / City of Rancho Palos Verdes DATE: 9/25/13 ENGINEER: VANESSA MUNOZ SIGNATURE: MAP SYMBOLS 0, \ ,.., ..., SCHOOL -1 'I-00 t, c• 0'6) R1-1 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL R1-1* 44P\• E a ' RI-1 z. 9/ i R1-1 le R1-1 STOP SIGN 4111,, rR1-1 n Crestwood Street R1-1/4 \It Elementary School ,e - SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT 4t* • 15 15 0. ASSEMBLY C (CA) R1-1 cr, S SCHOOL CROSSWALK 15A General St ici) CROSSWALK 0, ii)-• ,700,v io NTs x (a Bernice Dr e CD 2 DISTANCE 19 mile o co ALIGNMENT Horizontal curve. N.) i PARKING RESTRICTIONS None t STREET WIDTH 36' NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN One lane in each direction devided by single broken yellow line. 73 ib ((ifii IMPROVEMENTS (SW C&G) Concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk on east side only, 7, E *- . FRONTING DEVELOPMENT Residential, school on west side. z, o 6 D (-4 z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 2,768 (September 2012) 0 P - r\.) SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) N/A t3 o?, o Li -7" AVERAGE SPEED: N/A CRITICAL SPEED: N/A 10---Nii17.ETI60\ _i. 03 ct -rn 3-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA: 1/1/08 to 12/31/10 TOTAL MID-BLOCK ACC 0 NO.W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: N/A HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 4- x ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES CALTRANS AVERAGE: 2.55 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES -!- cr > EXISTING SCHOOL SPEED ZONE- 15 MPH PROPOSED SCHOOL SPEED ZONE - 15 MPH ,L2 e Per Section 22358.4 of the California Vehicle Code(CVC) if the segments meets all of the following characteristics: has two traffic _ COMMENTS lanes;a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour immediately prior to and after the school zone in a residential district it can be reduced to '7 15 mph. Since the segments meets all the characteristics, it is recommended that the reduced school zone speed limit remain at 15mph i Radar Speed Distribution Forms Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 53 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street CRENSHAW BOULEVARD Date 9/2712012 50th% 37 MPH Limits SEA CREST DR TO CREST RD Begin 9:40 End 11:00 85th% 41 MPH Surveyed at MID-BLOCK B1vvN SAN CLEMENTE AND SEA CREST Weather CLEAR Average 37 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 32 41 %in Pace 71% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total 1 Percentage 65 ; _ 0 0% 100.0% � 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0, 0%! 100.0% 1111111111111E 11111111111 t 60 , ____aa�.a �__, _ 0 0% 100.0%11 111.1111111 0 0% 100.0% • 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% aa��� __ � _ 0 0% 100.0oio 5 5 L dla. 0 0% 100.0% �. 11� 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% -_.._. 0 0% 100.0% ------- __-__- -_ 50 0 0 0% 0% 100.0% 100.0% �.0 r _..._ .__...... . ___.__. 1 1%i %j 100.0 IIIII _ ._ �._ illill X 0 0 3! 3% 98.1% 45 0 0 _ - a11111■a 2 2% 95.2% X X 1111=11111 a _ 2 2% 93.3% 0 IIIIIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII - 1 1% 91.4% X 0 0 0 4 4% 90.5% 0X X X 0 0 { h _ 6 6% 86.7% 40 X X X 0 X 0 0 0 0 I 9 9% 81.0% X 0 0 X X. 5% 72.4% X 0 0 0 X X X 7' 7%! 67.6% X 0 x 0 x X MI 111=11111113 12%1 61.0% 0 0 0 X 0 0 011111=111111111111111111a■a 11 10% 48.6% 35 0 0 X 0 0 XX ›IIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 8 8% 38,1% 0 X.X X-0 X 11111111111111111111111a1111111a11.�.. ._, 6 6% 30.5% aaa 0 0 0 0111111111111111111111111 4 4% 24.8% X X X 0 0 X IIIIIIINIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIII 61 6!k 21.0% .....-._...... ............................ _ 3l ....._15.2% _ . 30 XX . , 4 %'I 12.4% © � IIIIMIIIIIIIIMII ■ 4 4% 8.6% .� 11111111111111 2 2% 4.8% II� IIIIIIII 1 1% 2.9% 111111.. 11111a11111 0 0% 1.9% 25XVIM11111111111111111111111111111111111=1= 2 2% 1.9% IIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIMNIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 0% 0.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIII 0% 0.0% 0% 0.0°/a• 11111111 1111111111111 111.1111. �� 1111111 .--7, Q% 0.0% ' 11111111111111111111 II 0 0% 0.0% 15 11111111111111111111111111111111 ...,........ 0%: 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed - 105 100 Page 54 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street CRENSHAW BOULEVARD Date 9/26/2012 50th% 43 MPH Limits CREST RD TO RHE CITY LIMIT Begin 16:00 End 16:40 85th% 47 MPH Surveyed at MID-BLOCK BTWN CREST AND CRESTRIDOE Weather CLEAR Average 42 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 39 48 % in Pace 72% I - MPH 1 NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total ! Percenta•e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0%1 100.0% 0 0%1 100.0% ... III. .. .. 0 0<)/ 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% milli ........- 1 01 0% 100.0% 01 0% 100.0% .._ III � �� _ 0 0%. 100.0%, 55IIIIEIEIIIIMIMI 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% IIIIIIIIIIMII ■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 0% 100.0% 01 1%, 100.0% 0 02 2% 99.1% 50 X 0 0 0 ,0 , - - , - _ 5 4% 97.4% 0 02 2% 93.0% X 0 0 0 4 3% 91.3% x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 9% 87.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II 8, 7%n 79.1% 45 X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 9% 72.2% 0 7. 6% 63.5 X X X X X X 0 0 0 010 9% 57.4% X X X X X 0 008 7%. 48.7% X X X X X X X X X 0 10 9% 41.7% 40x X X X X,0 0 0 - 8 7% 33.0%, `X X X X X0 0 08 7% 26.1%i X X 0 04 3% 19.1% X X X X O5 4% 15.7% X1 1%, 11 3% 35x X X0 05 4%1 10.4% X 0 03 3%: 6.1% X X2 2% 3.5% X1 1% 1.7% x1 1% 0.9% -1 30 01 0% 0.0% 01 0% 0.0% o 0%` 0.0°/ 0 0% 0.0% 25 •-0 0% 0.0% o 0% 0.0% 111111111=1111 - ,.111 _, . 1111 ►. I - 1 • 0 0% 0.0°� _ 0 0 Io 0.0%� o 0% 0.0% 20I 0 0%. 0.0% 0 0% 0 0% E + O 0°Io 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 1 t i ) . 1 t 0 0% 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed ; 1151 100 %i%���� Page 55 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street CREST ROAD Date 9/26/2012 50th% 47 MPH Limits HAWTHORNE BLVD TO CRENSHAW BLVD Begin 15:10 End 15:46 85th% 52 MPH Surveyed at WHITLEY COLLINS DR Weather CLEAR Average 47 MPH Direction EASTBOUND&WESTBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 43 52 in Pace 74% MPH ' NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 1: 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percenta•e 65 111111111111.11 UIUUU - 0 0% 100.0% 1111.1111111111111111 �� _._..._0 0% 100.0% 0 0%t. 100.0% X7 1 1% . .~......^100.0% r_... X,_ w 1 1% 99.1% 60 x a 98.1% ........................._....... ._..--__.....__._...... 1 1 a, 0 0% 97.2% EI �� �o= .um 0 0% 97.2% UI . ;___�. N� N N a 0% 97.2% 11.1111111111111111111 111111. 1. 1% 97.2% 55 1111.111.1111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 0 0% 96.3% 0 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIMIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIMMIIIIMMIII 2{ 2% 96.3% X 0 0 0 1111111 .1111111111111111'111111111■11111111 4 4% 94.4% X X X 0 0 0 0 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 7 7% 90.7% X 0 0 0 0 0 0 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 7% 84.1% 50i x X X 0 0 0 MIIIIIMEMINIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII7 7% 76.6% 1111111111111111111111111111111111 X X X X 0 0 0 08 7°/a 70.1 11� ��11�1 © 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12% 62.6°la X X X X X 0 0 0'0 0 • 1 o 9% 50.5% x x x x x xQ© a 0 0 U II 1 10% 41.1% 45 X X x x o 0 en.. 1111111.1111.11111ME1111111111 8 7% 30.8% X 0 2 2% 23.4% X X X a o 5 5% 21.5% X X X 0 0 • • N •• 5 5%i 16.8% X X 0 0 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 4 4%f 12.1/° 40 X X X 0 0 11111111111111111111111=111111111111111111111111111111 5 5% 8.4% X X o 1111 1111aa aaa111111a 3` 3% 3.7% 11.1111.111111111=11.1.111111111111111111111111111111111111110- + 0% 0.9% 111UN 1111111111111NN UUU U 0 0% 0.9% 11111111NNU11111NNU U 0 0%1 0.9% j 35 1 1 1%10.9% 0 0% 0.0% U. UUU� III�I 0 0% 0.0% 'aIIIIIIIIMINIIIIIMIIIIIIIIMIIINMIZINI 1111 0 0% 0.0% 111111111111111.111111111111111111111U .........................9.. ..9% °o. %o 30 INM11111SUN , 0 0% 0.0% ■U ■ IENU111111NUU 0 0% 0.0% a,__ _ 0% 0.0%0 0% 0.0% ��rrr�r �r� rr11r10.0% 25 11rul 0 0%, 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% IIIMIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIIMIINIIMIMIIIIIIIMIIIIMIIIIIIIIMIIMIIIIIIMIN o o% 0.0% IIIIIIMIIIIIIIIINIMINIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMOIIIIIIMIINMIIMIIIIMNIIIIIIIII o 0%1 0.0% 11110111111.1111111111111of- 0%l 0.0% 20' 111111111111111 0 0%1 0.0% .1111111111 . . N. 0 0%' 0.0% 11111111111 1111111 11111 0 0% 0-0% .IIa o 0 0% 0.0 Io IMIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIMIIIIIIIIMMIIMIMIIIIMIMIIIINIMIIMINIIIIIIIIIMIIIIII a 0% 0.0% 15:.. a 0%! 0 0% X-East bound 0-West Bound Total Observed 107E 100 r/ , Page 56 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street CREST ROAD Date 9/26/2012 50th% 38 MPH Limits PALOS VERDES DR EAST TO GANADO DR Begin 1115 End 12:15 85th% 44 MPH Surveyed at MID-BLOCK BIM DECANIA AND DELUNA Weather CLEAR Average 38 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 34 43 %in Pace 67% I MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percentage 65 i 0 0% 100,0% 11111111111111111111111111111 1111111111 IV. III III I - III . 111111 0 0% 100 0% 61111 111111111111111111111111 I 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% o 0%1 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% El • 1111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0001, 000'0%/k. 111000000...000% ": 11 1111111111111111111111111 II 0' 0% 100.0% 55•11111111111111111161.111111111111.1111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111 0 0% 100.0% INIMENINIMINEMINNEI 1111111111111111111111111 1 1%. 100.0% MINNININNMINNIMINIIMI IMINNUMNIMMINNI 0 0% 99.0% 5°I ° 1111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111 I 2 2Q/o 99.0% 01 0% 97.0% 01 0% 97.0% OMMMEMMEMMMINIMMOIM MOIMMEMMEMOIMM 1 1% 97,0% FIRE111111.1111111r111111111111 2 2% 96.0% 2 2% 94.1% 45 Ina 0 11 0 11111111111111111 111 111.1111111111111111111111111 5 5% 92 1% 11011111111111111 111111111111 3! 3% 871% 51 5% 84,2% 1511100111EUMENNUMNI rrIMMMMIMININNI 6 6% 79.2% 10131112111101.11111•11111111111 NM 1111111111111111111111 6 6% 73.3% 40 CIEEMIXIBIEBIDEEEMI IIIIII IMINIIMMINIMINIENE 13 13% 67.3% Be dell 011111111.111111111111111111111111111011111111.111111111111111111 5 5% 54.5% 11§ 0 0 112 0 ° IMEN111111111011111111111.111111111111111111111111111 8 8% 49.5% IMMEIMIMMINNEINNUMMINNIMMENNIENNENHIN 4 4% 41.6% OnanannEMEMMMOMMMINMEMMOIMMOIMMMIIIII 7% 376% 3510 ° OnginUMMINIMMINIMM MMINIMMEMINIMM 7% 117% nononuommammommam mammommunimm 7% 23.8% © 0 CI 0EINNENIMEMENIMMI 111111111111111MENANINI 5 5%i 16.8% 11313131111111111111111111MINIMMINI 1111111111111111111111111111 4 4%1 11.9% OMMMEMMEMMOMMEMMI MIMMOMMOM1111 _4___ W 7.9% 30 OE 0 111111111111111111111111111111111111 INININIIIIIIIII 3' 3% 6.9% 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111 1i 1% 4.0% I R1111111111111111 111111111111 0 0% 3.0% 1 1% 3.0% 111.11111111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0 0% 2.0% 25111111111111111111111111111111 1 1% 2.0% 0 0% 1.0% MINIMOMMEMMOMMINIMM IINIMMEMMOMMINE 0 0% 1.0% 111111111111111111111111111111111101111111 111111101111111111111111111111 0 0% 1.0% IMMOMMENINNAMMINIMENI 11111111111111111111111111 1 1% to% 20 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 INIMININIMEIMMEN 0 0% 0.0% IMINMINNIMINEMINNIMINEI 1111111MEMEIMININ 0 o% 00% 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111MMEMINUMMINEINI 0 ooki 0.0% IMINIMNIENNEMIMMINIMINITIMEMBINEIMIE 0 0% 00% IMINININMIIMNIIIMNINIIIIMIMMII 1111111111111111111111111111111 0 o% 00% 15 limmommplupimmisaimm immpopammumm 0 0% 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 1011 100 r/ / Page 57 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street CREST ROAD Date 9/26/2012 50th% 35 MPH Limits GANADO DR TO RH CITY LIMIT Begin 12:45 End 14:45 85th% 41 MPH Surveyed at 1,500'NIO GANADO DR Weather CLEAR Average 36 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 33 42 %in Pace 71% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percenta�..e... 651111111111111111111 , 11101111111111111111111111111111111 0 0%, 100.0% ■r■■rrr■■■■■ ■■r■■■■r■r 0 0% 100.0% r■ ■r 0 0% 100.0% �� ■■ 01 0%/0 100.0% 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111 M 0 0% 100.0%, 60 ■ ■ ■■ ■r ■ ■ 0 0% 100.0% ■ ■ ■ ■ ■r ■ ■ W-...-..... 111.1111111111111111111111111111111.111111111=0.11111.11111 0 0% 100.0% ■■■■■■rr■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ 0 op/° oo_o°i° _,..,1.,,,..,,,.. ■ ■ Ili._... 0 0%! .... 100 % 55 0 100.00,--.' ■ ■'ill' ° _ 100.0% 0 o% i iiii _ _._.. 1 1% 100,0% 0 0%� 98.7% ■ ■ 00°I 999877;50 ■ 11% 98■■ II ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■ ■ ■■ 0 0%! ■■■ 1111111.111.111111111111111111111111111111111111 ■ - 0 0% { ■ 1 1% 97.4% ■ 11111111.1111111111111 0 0% 96.1% 45 a.a■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■ ■■r■■ ■■0 3 4% 96.1% f a ■■r■■■■r■■■ ■■ ■■ 2 3% 92.2% ■■■■���■■■ ■■ ■■ 0 0% 89.6% Ell 0 fl■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■_■■111111■ 4% 89.6% CI 0 ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■ Mil 3% 85.7% 40 Q o 0 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111=11111111111 -■ M 9% . 83.1% 1313111111111111111111.1111111111111111111111.11111111111 - 2 3% 74.0% 111111111111111111111111.1111111111111111111111.111111.11111 11111 2 3% 71.4% lannIMIIIIINIMIE1111111111.111111111.111111111111111 ■■ 3 4% 68.8%, aa© fUaa ■r■ U■�■■ ■ 10 13% 64.9% 3 5:Off©fl©fl 0 a ■.■ ■ 9 12%' 51.9% 13110111111311111131131 ■r■-■■■1111111r■111111■ 8 10% 40.3% nnonn, 001311111.1.111MMEMMEMMEM 912%1 29.9% aarlr■■■■■■■r ■■ ■ 111113' 4%, 18.2% IINIMIMIMRIIIMNIMIMIMIIIIII= ■ AREIMOOMMEMMEMMEMMM23%} 14.3% II 8%111.7% r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r ■■■■■■■■■ all0 0%1 3.9% ■■■ a■■■■r■ ■ ■rr■ ■ ■■ ■■ am 1 1% 3.9`rte, ■■■■■r■r■■ r ■ ■r■■■■■■■ ■■ 0 0% 2.6% ■■UU■■■■1111111■■■1111111■ ■■■■■■■■■ MIN 0' 0% 2.6% 25 IEIMIUMIIIIMMIIIMIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIAII 1 .. _ - 1% 2.6% •■■■■■■ ■ ■ 1 1% 1.3% ■■■U■■■ ■■■ ■■■�■U -- 0 0% 0.0`)/0 .MIIIIIIIIIMIIINIMIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ■■1111111111■■111111■ - _ 0 0% 0.0% ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ - _ 0 0%1---- 0.0°i° 20_ ■r ■■■ ■■ 1111111 111111111111111111 _... ■■ ■■U■■■ ■ MM. o 0%, 0.0% Ur rr■_■r■ ■ MEMO 0 i 0%, 0.0% 11111111111111111111111111111 MEM■rM 0 0% 0.0% 111111111111111111111111111 ■■■■■r■■■■ ME 0 0%, 0.0% 15 UU■111U■■■ r■■ U■UURU a, 0%tP 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed � ,- 77_ 100 / Page 58 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street CRESTRIDGE ROAD Date 9/25/2012 50th% 39 MPH Limits CRENSHAW BLVD TO HIGHRIDGE RD Begin 12:30 End 13:15 85th% 43 MPH Surveyed at CHURCH IN FRONT OF SCHOOL Weather CLEAR Average 39 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 34 43 %in Pace 76% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles I Total , Percenta e 65 i 0 0°/n; 100.0% , , 0 E 0%l0 100.0% .-__-- r. .... _ _ . , 01 0% 100.0% o 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0' 0% 100 0% 0 00/ 100.0% o 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0%, 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100-0%' 0 0% 100-0% 0 0%; _ 100.0% 50,0 Q 2 2%r 100.0%, 01 1%J 98.1% O X2 2%1 97.2% O 1 1% 95.3% 0 0 0 0 0 - 5 5% 94.3% 45,0 0 0 X o4 4% 89 6% O 1 1%, 85.8% X 0 0 r 1111111M-T-34.6;7:, 0 0 0 0 0 0 X7 7%i 82.1% O O X X O X 6 6%1 69. 8%75.5% 1 `:. 40 OX 0 XXX O OX 9 8% O 0 0 X 0 0 X X X X X X - 13 61.3%, O 0 x 0 X 0 OXXXXX 12 11% 49.1% O O X 0 0 XXX •------*-- - •-- 8 8_ %i 37.7% 0 X X X X X X X X9 8%' 30.2% 35 0 X 0 X 0 X X X X X ____�-_ ____ 10 9°/n t 21.7%, O X X X 4 _� 4% 12.3% X X3 3% 6.6% , o X _ µ _ 2 2% 3.8% 30 0 X2 2% 1.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% _ 0, 0%1 0.0% 0 0%1 0.0% 25 0 0%t 0.0% 0 _0% 0.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0I 0%! 0.0% I f _. 0 0% 0,0% 0 0%I 0.0% 20 _ 0 0%` 0.0% . ' ----- - 00%1 0.0% 0 0%1 0.0% f ' , , I I . I 0 0%i 0.0% 0 0%? 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% AX-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 106: 100 � �/ / Page 59 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street FORRESTAL DRIVE Date 9/27/2012 50th% 33 MPH Limits PALOS VERDES DR S TO NORTH TERMINUS Begin 11:30 End 13:30 85th% 37 MPH Surveyed at MID-BLOCK BTWN PVDS AND PIRATE DR Weather CLEAR Average 33 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 29 38 %in Pace 82% MPH [ NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 1 Q 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percenta•e .. .. :: . .. . 6511.1111MMUMMIMMIMMMIMMINNIMMINIMM o 0% 100.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MU■■■■■ ■■ 0; 0% 100.0% 111111111111111111111111111111 0 0% 0. 0% 100.0% 100.0% ■■■■■■■■■mu■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% �� 0 0% 100.0% ■■■■■ ■ ■■■ ■■■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■ 0 0% 100.0% ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ UU■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■ a0°/a 100.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■UU■UU■■■■ ■■ ■■■■ 0 0% 100.0% 55■■■■■■■■■UU■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ 0 0% 100.0% ■INI■■■■■■ ■■■■■MM■■■■ 0' 0% 100.0% •UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU 0 0% 100.0% 111111111111111111111111111111 n 0% 100.0%0 0% 100.0'° 50 ■■■■■■UU■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 0' 0% 100.0% UMMIIMMINIMMMINIMMOIMUMMINIMMIMMINIM9. 0% 100.0% ■ ■■■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ 0. 0% 100.0% 111111111111111111111111111111 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 1 0% % 100,0, 100.0 45a■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ M 1 1% 99.0% BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU 1 �° 97.9°h .■ 1 1% _96.9% o ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■■■ ■■■■ ■ ■ 1 1% 95.8% 0 ■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■ _ 1%I 94.8% 400 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,111 _........_,1:./k)0,1 % .... 93.8% ■■ ■ ■ ■ 0% ._......._ 90.6% P.11111111111■■ PP' 3 8 3% 90.6% ' nom= ; ■ ■ _� _....._....._ 8% 87.5% f' o f 'U©flf' ■■■■■■■ ■■ ■ ■ill ■■ ■■ 7 7% 79.2% 35fi © 0a© n n r 0 ■■■ ■■■■ ■ ■ 9 9% 71.9% oLH1II1NI1I11IIIINI11II 8 8%11 11°/awfl8 _8% _0o © Q©X0 0 01111111111111 ■■ 11 ■ ■ 13 14% 26.0% Y41 ©■■■■■■■UU■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■ 4 4%44 12.5% 3� 3%I 8.3%-- 2%, 5.2% 1,11111111111,111111,1111 _...........1` 1% 3.1% 25 2 2ala 2.1% ■■■■■ MMI ■ 0 0% 0.0% ■■■■ ■■■■ ■ 0 ___..._.. 0% 0.0% ■■■■■■UU■ ■ ■ ■ o o°ia 0.0% 2 0■■■■■■■ �■■■ ■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■■ 0 0%i 0.0% ■■UU■■■ ■■■■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■■■ 0 0%. 0.0% U■■■■■■UU■■■■■ ■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■■ 0I 0% 0.0% ■■■■■■UU■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■ 0 o°' 0.0% 1 - 0 0% 0.0% 15 ! 0 0% 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 96 100 Page 60 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street GRANVIA ALTAMIRA Date 9/26/2012 50th% 34 MPH Limits HAWTHORNE BLVD TO PVE CITY LIMIT Begin 12:50 End 13.28 85th% 37 MPH Surveyed at 100'S/O MONERO DR Weather CLEAR Average 34 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by J.L. 10MPH 29 38 %in Pace 91% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 2C 25 30 Vehicles Total Percentage t 65 ! 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% IIIuII.IiUIiIiIHhIIII.... 0 0°/0, 100.0% 0 0%1 100.0% arra■ar■■■■■aa■aa■ ■■■■■■■■■1111■ 0 0% 100.0% 60 ■ 0 0% 100.0% 00% 100.0% ■1111■111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 r■a■11r■■r■■■rr■■rr■■■■■■ 0 100.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII0 0% 100.0% 11111111111111 IIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIINIIINIIIIIIII 0 0%1 100.0% ::llh1hllh1II111IH 4 0 0%i 100.o°r°� 0 0% 100.0°!0a 0% 1 oo.o°i°l l o o% 100 o°f°0 0% 100. %0 0% 100.0% 00% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 O°IOI 100.0%11 �^1 _... __ 0 0% 100.0% 45 EIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 1% 100.0% 111111111111111111111111111111 0 0% 99.0°1° 0 0% 99.0% 1 1%t 99.0% 1111111111111111111 ■■■111111■■■ ■■■■r■11■11■■■■ 2 2%1 981% 40 x a 2. 2% EEO o X1111111IIIIIIIIII2I 2°I0 X 04 4% 1111111111111111 X 0 X 0 X 0 0 X 0 9 9% 88.3% 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0 0 12 12%: 79.6% 35 0 X X p X 0 0 X o'X 0 X 13 13%! 68.0% 0 0 O I X 0 0 0 X 0 0 X 13 13% 55.3% 11 0 0 11 0 MEM 0 11 0 ■■■■■aa■■■■a■ ■ 1111 ■�. _ 11 11% 42.7% •© 0 11 0 11111111© 0 11■■■■■■a■■■r■ ■■r II1212%? 32.0% 0 0 ■ ■ _............. 10 ... 10W 20.4% 30 It ■ ■ ■ r 7 7% _... 10.7% f 0 111111111111.111° ■ ■■■ ■a■ ■ ■ ■ r■■ ■ 3 3% 3.9°0!° 1i 1/0; 1.0% l r r ■ r ■ r 11111111■■■■■ 0# o%' 0 0% ::IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIHIIIIIIII 0 0% 0.0% ■a■■ 1111■■■■ ■ 1111 1111■■ ■ ■__.... _._..._ 0 __.--- 0% 0.0% ■ ■■arra■ 1111■ ra ■ __ 0 0% 0.0% ____a a._ a___■■r■ r 1111■ ■ ■1111 ■ 0 0%; 0.0% 15 1 i 1 ' i 00%t 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 1 103 100 //. Page 61 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 9/25/2012 50th% 44 MPH Limits PALOS VERDES DR WTO VALLON DR Begin 10:00 End 10:35 85th% 49 MPH Surveyed at CITY HALL DRIVEWAY Weather CLEAR Average 45 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 40 49 %in Pace 76% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of 1 Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percenta.e 65 I ME 0 0% 100.0% IIII . 111111 0 0% 100.0% 0_ 0% 100.0% L 0 0% 100.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 0% 100.0% 60 II1= Ell a 0% 100.0% ,._ 0 0% 100.0%' rIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII MINI 11% 100.0% a . mom 1 1% 99.1 _ ill _ i... ,..____ _ IIIIII 0 0% 98.1% 55 ,1 0 0% 98.1% 1 1% 98.1% 002 2% 97.2% 00 _ 2 2% 95.3% X 0 0 0 0 5 5% 93.5%, 50 0 a a IIIIIII 3 3% 88.8% X X 0 0 000 ,. .. - 7 7% 86.0% 0 X 0 0 0 0 0 0 7%, 79.4%, 1 _ 8 72.0%7 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 7% 111 .1, ,... .x x 0 0.0 06 6% 65.4% . . _ 45 xxxxxo 0 0 0,0 , . . 10 9% 59.8% X X X X X X X 0 0 0 0 11 1140://a'a 50.5% 0 0 oxxxxxxxxxxa 0 _ - 15 40.2% xxxo 4 4%. 26.2% ,.. xxxo4 4% 22.4% . . 40 xXxxxxxo ,o III 9 8% 18.7% X X x1111111 3 3% 10.3% ....._...•.• ____ X X 2 2% 7.5% ..._ .__.... _ XXX 3 3% 56%: 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINII ..-----... ...---4 .-----..e.--- - . 1 1% 2.8% .........._.............••..._....._..........,_ 35 X . 1 1%1 1.9% E IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ___.... 0 0%! 09% X 1 1°/ 6.9% k 0 1111111111111111111111111111 rill * 0 00+------1 -- 0.0% .__ 111 0 0% 0.0% 30. , . ' 11111 ------ . -.---------- a 0% 0.0% 0 0% , , --.----. - 0.0% _ . 0 0% 0.0% ' _ 1111 - 00/ 0.0% .-.. , _ .._.....- , - II 0 0%i 0.0% 25 1111 II 0 0% 0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 4-4- 4. 4-4--.-4 Mil 0 0%1 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 14.---4--- II= 0 0% 0.0% 111 ,---- 0 0% 0.0% 1111.111111111111111111111111 "*. 0 0% 0.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIII ll I ' -- MI 0 0'I 0.0% t . ' 1.11 111 0 1 -.-------0 * 0.0% 1 5 1 -! , 0 0% 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 107' 100 . Page 62 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 9/2e/2012 50th% 45 MPH Limits VALLON DR TO CREST RD Begin 10:45 End 11:20 85th% 49 MPH Surveyed at LOS VERDES DR ______ Weather CLEAR Average 45 MPH Direction woRTHaoumo&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 40 49 %in Pace 77% MPH ------- NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number Percent of 1 Cumulative s` . `o ^ _ .`y. ' xq os 30 Vehicles \ Total Percentage` eoo 0% 100.0%' ' ' ' ^ ' - ' ' ' ' o' o% 100.0% ' ^ ' ' ' ' ' ' \ ' ' ' 0 ��| 100.0% --------- ' ' - -- ^ o ' 1000m — --�--' �' - ' ' ^--- f ~~' o. 0% 100.0m 60 ' - n 100.0% x _+___ r 1% 100.0%, ^_, __,___ __ / o 99,1% 0-0°/0? 99.1% -----' - 0 0% e9.1m . 55 / — 0 om. 99.1% . om. 99.1%o' 0% 99.1% .. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ^ ' ' x o _ _ _ . o. 3% 99.1% 0 o � zm. 96.4%. 50 x. x xo o u o ok000 . _ . . ~ _ n. � 94.6% x x x o o o o o . . __ _ __ . . . . . n 84.8% x. x xx. x X 0 0 0 --- , ~ . _ _ _ _ _ � 8% 77.7°/.X_�x_x_�_o __ o' 5%XXXXXXx x x 0000 10 9% 64.3m *ox x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 IIIIIIIIIM 10% 55+% XX __ . 11.1111111E 6% 45 5% X x x o o n o o 8 7% 39.3% o o � o ' ' - ' —^ ' ' ' ' ~ — X X 0 7i 6% 32.1m .» X : o 0 0 | 61 5% 25.9% 4ox x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0` ^ � 14 13% oo5� . . .xxxxx o' 4% a0% ' ' ' - ' XXXXx . . . + . 4 4% ae% . _ _ _ . . _ 0 o� 0,0%. . . _ _ . . o m% o�% os. . . . . . ^ o ��' 0.0% ' | o| o� I 0%' | - ' o m%. *�_, . .__ o� _ _ ao o 0% 0.0%, 0 oom -------^- ---___o �� oo� •• -- ' 0 0%' 0.0% • o' 0m o0% |/| 25 0 0.0%___ / 11 o 0.0%, ' ' ' o' 0.0%o0%1 0.0%I �0 m% 0.0%. 000 oy 0.0°/0. -- -- ^^_ 111111111' 1s . . X North bound _ o'South Bound Total Observed 112 100 Page 63 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 9/25/2012 50th% 44 MPH Limits CREST DR TO EDDINGHILL DR Begin 11:30 End 12:00 85th% 48 MPH Surveyed at INDIAN VALLEY RD Weather CLEAR Average 45 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L.T. 10MPH 39 48 %in Pace 82% I MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of I Percent of ! Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total I 65 X - _ .._... -._ 1 1°l0 100.0% i IN= Oi 0% 99.1% G 0% 99.1% 0' 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1%, 60 01' 1% 991% 0%IIIIIIII= - ...--_• �..� .......�......_. �.....---........ 0 98.2i 111111111111.1111111111 _-�__..._...__.. ... ____... 0, 0%, 98.2%i 0 0% 98.2% 111110111111.1111111111 0' 0%, 98.2% 55 0 X 11111111111 2 2% 98.2% .UMIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIMIIIIIII °/a 1 � 96.4°�A �._ , X 1 1% 95.5% 0IM, , 1 1%, 94.5%IIIIEI F + I . .. , X X X 3 3% 93.6%te 50 X X i X3. 3% 90.9% . XX G a4 4% 88.2% X X 0 31 3% 84.5% X X X0 0 • 5 5% 81.8% o X 0 X 0 0 XXX 0 0 0 0 0II= 14 13% 77.3%, 45 XX 0 X 0 XX0 00 0 0 0,0 00 _ + 16 15% 64.5%, OXXXOXO7 6°l0 50,0% X X X X 0 XX 0 09` 8% 43.6%1 11113111EX X 0 0 0 010 9% 35.5% X 0 0 X 0 X X 0 0 0 0 11! 10% 26.4% 40:X X X 0 X 0 0 0 0 0 ------it-71---1% 16.4% X X 0 X 5 5% 7.3% X 1 1% 2.7% 01 1 1% 1.8°la . 0 0%# 0.9% 35 0i 1 1% 0.9°l0 I 0, 0%, 0.0% ' 01 0% 0.0%, 01 0% 0.0% 30: - j 0% 0.0% 01 0°la 0.0% _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0%J 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25=MI , 0 0% 0.0% ___...,.._ lillinill _ _ o 0% 0.0% 11111111111111111111 IIIIIM 0 0% 0.0% 110111111111111111111111 0 0% 0.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMMINMIIIIa MN 0�_ 0% 0.0% 20 _ 0; 0%+ 0.0 % 0 0°/a{ 0.0% 0 0%1 0.0% 0 0%i 0.0% _... 0, 0%1 0. 0%� 15 1 0 0% 0.0% 1 X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 110; 100 /// #, Page 64 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 9/25/2012 50th% 42 MPH Limits EDDINGHILL DR TO HIGHRIDGE RD Begin 13:30 End 14:05 85th% 46 MPH MID-BLOCK BTVVN GRANVIA ALTAMIRA AND Surveyed at SAN NICLOLAS DR Weather CLEAR Average 42 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by L,T: 10MPH 38 47 %in Pace 88% MPH . NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of 1 Cumulative ' i. 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles I Total 1 Percenta•e 65 , II 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0+ 0% 100.0% --_----• --_, �_- 0 _ 0% 100.0% 01 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% _ ._nil _______,.... _____ 1 ____._____. 0 0% 100.0% 0 0 . 100.0/°' /° Ell 111111111 0 0% 100.0% 0 1111=1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1% 100.0% 55 . ♦ _ t I 0 0%, 99.0% 0 0% 99.0% 0 0% 99.0% 0 1 1% 99.0% 0 0% 98.1% 50 X 0 III 1E112 2%1 98.1% 0 1 1% 96.2% .. 10111111111 . 1111111111110111011 0 0% 95.2 X X X 0 0 0 6 6% 95,2`/-"-:, X X 0 0 0 0 i 6 6% 89,5% 45 X X X X 0 0 044... 7 7% 83.8% X X X X 0 0 0 0 8 8%i 77.1%, x X x o 0 0 0 o a o 10 10%€ 69.5% X X X X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13% 60.0% EXX XX XXXXXX .0f0 0 « 10 10%1 46.7% 40 X X X X X X X X I 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13% 37.1% X,XX X X X X XIX 0 0 0 013 12% 23.8% X X 0 04 4% 11.4% X 0 0 3 3% 7.6% X X 2 2% 4.8% 35,0 1 1% 2.9% X 1 1% 1.9% 111111111111111111111 0 0%l 1.0% X 111-.1-'-111111.11111111111111 - 1.111111111111111110 1 1%1 1.0% i' � 0 0%I 0.0% 30 _ 0 0% 0.0% j 1 , 0 0%1 0.0% 0 0%1 0.0% 0 0%1 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% . 0, 0% 0.0% .. . . ', , ; } '� y , i 0' 0% 0.0% r 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 -- aaaa o- 0%, 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% _ aaaa 0 0% 0.0% __ ____ �_ _ III _ _- - - 0. 0% 0.0%, 15.W. . . _J-10 0% 0.0% V X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 105 100 4 Page 65 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 9/26/2012 50th% 43 MPH Limits HIGHRIDGE RD TO INDIAN PEAK RD Begin 13:40 End 14:29 85th% 46 MPH Surveyed at 100'W/O RAVENSPUR DR(EB) Weather CLEAR Average 43 MPH Surveyed at 50'E/O WOODBROOK RD(WB) Recorded by J.L. 10MPH 38 47 Direction EASTBOUND&WESTBOUND %in Pace 82% F�1PH + NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of ! Cumulative I 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percentage 65 y _ 0 0%i 100.0% • 0 0% 100.0%, 0} 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 11 1% 100.0% 60=EMI= 00% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 1011111111111011111111111111 .....-I_______ C 0% 99.1 0 0% 99.1% 0 0% 99.1% 55 + aa IIIIIIIM 0 0% 99.1% 01 0% 99.1% - ' 0 0% 99.1% X: 1 1`-'10 99.1%� 0 0% 98.1% 50 X 1 1% 98.1% X X 0 3 3%` 97.2%, X X 0 04; 4% 94.4"/0 XXXXOI5 5% 90.7% X X_X_X.o 0 04 _ - _ 4 7 6%, 86.1% 45 X X X X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 III _ _ 12 11% 79.6% X X X X f T X 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 10%t 68.5% X X X X X o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ■ ' 12 1 1% 58.3% X x x x x x o o o 0 0 o N 12 11% 47.2% X X X 0 0 0 0 0 1111111111111111111111111 8 7% 36.1% 40 x x x 0 0 0 0 0 ` 8 7°/n 28.7%, x x x 0 0 0 1111111111111111 6 6% 21.3% X X X 0 0 0 0 0 a 8 7%, 15.77% X X 0 - 3 3% 8.3% x 02 2%? 5.6% 35 X 0 03 3%' 3.7% x 1' 1% 0.9°/, 0 0% 0.0% 01 0% 0.0'l01 III _ 30 _ 0 0% 0.0%, 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0 o _ 0% 0.0°I° • -4.----..-..-...----.----,--__ _ 2 5 o - 0% 0.0'7/(7 0 3 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0.0% , % 200 0% 0.0% ___. , 0 0%I 0.0%g 0 0% 0.0% : _. 15 0 0% 0.0% r r • s . s . . i ! 1 1 X-East bound 0-West Bound Total Observed 108 100 / Page 66 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 9/26/2012 50th% 47 MPH Limits SILVER SPUR RD TO RHE CITY LIMIT Begin 14.40 End 15:17 85th°%° 52 MPH Surveyed at 200'S1O BLACKHORSE RD(NB) Weather CLEAR Average 47 MPH Surveyed at 300'N/O BLACKHORSE RD(SB) Recorded by J.L. 10MPH 42 51 Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND %in Pace 75% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total ' Percenta+e 65 MMINIMMINIMMOMMOMMININIMMOMM MEM 0 0% 100.0% IIMMINNIMMINIMMINIMMINIMMENUMMEMMEN 0 0% 100.0% II I 111111111111111111I �� 111111 0 0%i 100.0% 8101111 MMINIMMOMMEMMOIMMMONIMMINIMMINI 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 22% 100.0%� . 11% 98.1%r..........11111111111111111111111111U.U.■ .UU.r»UU.UU 0 0% 97.1% r.UU..U.U.. UU•.r .rU ■.U.U..0 0 0% 97.1% . 0.....UU.. ..... .U. UUUUUUUU2 2%i 97.1% 55E1 0 0 ■.r.rr..U.r..U.U.......UUUU 3 3% 95,2% Kin 0 .......... .UU.UU.U....UU.. 4 4% 92.4% 0 U..U.UUUU. ..U.UU.UU.U.U.UU 2 2% 88.6% 11 0 0 3 3°1° 86.7% X° x 0 0 0 IIIIIIIIIIIflhIIIIIflUa 7 7% 83.8% 50 .®. 0 QUUUUUUU.UU.UUUUU.U.UUUU■ 6 6% 77.1% ©.fl.......................... 4 4% 71.4% ©.©.. 0 D 0 0 Q 0 ■U.UU.UU.U.UU.U..U. 11 10% 67.6% IIIIIIRB111111111111111111111� 10+ 10%i 57.1% 101 10%i 47.6% 45 130 0 1 11 i 10%i 38.1% 1■ _ 71 7% 20.0% ...0 0 .U.UU..U..UUUUU.000UUUU. 5 5% 13.3% 11313nE111111111111111111.1111111.11111111.1111111111111.111111111111111111MIIIM 3% 8,6% 40131 0 EIIMMIIIIIIMIINMIIMIIIMIMIIIINIIIIIIIIIINIIMIIIIININMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMB 3% 5.7% i UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU•UU111% 2.9% ©LD..U...UU..UUUUUUUUUUUUUU.UUU 2%i 1.9% UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUOMMUUUUUUUU 0 0% 0.0% 0 0%1 0.0% 35IFIIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 0% 0.0% MUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU,U 0 0% 0.0% UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU 0 0% 0.0% 111..1.1..1....1.....111..... 0 0%1 0.0% �� �� �� o o%i 0.0% 30 �� . .� ■�� 0 0%1 0.0% ��� ��� ��������� 0 0%1 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% O 0% 0.0% ���� �� �� 0 0% 0.0% 2511111111111111111111111111111 5 . . � 0 0% ._.... 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 11 II ■m......U....r. . ■... . .U.■ . 0 0% 0.0% j U.r.....U.. m.. ����� �� om 11111111 IIII 1111111111 .. 0 ____ o°ia 0.0% o 0% 0.0% 201 0 0°/° 0.0°I° 0 0%i 0.0% O 0%' 0.0% U.... . . ■U.U..U.0 .U....U......... 0 0% 0.0% ■-W._.■i ■.. _......m........■ 0 0°i° 0.0% 15 1 1 1 , 11111.1111.1111MMIMM 0 0% 0.0% iX-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 105! 100 ` z Page 67 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street H1GHR!DGE ROAD Date 9/25/2012 50th% 36 MPH Limits HAWTHORNE BLVD TO RHE CITY LIMIT Begin 14:37 End 15:29 85th% 39 MPH Surveyed at 200'S/O HILLTOP CIRCLE(NB) Weather CLEAR Average 36 MPH Surveyed at 100'S/O RIDGEGATE DR(SB) Recorded by J.L. 10MPH 31 40 Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND %in Pace 91% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of I Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total ; Percentage 65 - I 1 0 0% 100.0%I _ 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% . _ 0 0% 100.0%: 0 0% 100.0% 60 - -_ - _-_-•�- - - - - - 0 f On/o 100.Q"lo . ...._ 0 0% 100.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI 0 0% 100.0% 11111111111111111111111111111111 0 0% 100.0°/2 IIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIMII 0 0% 100.0% 5511111111111111111111111111 0 0%,�__ 100.0°/n i 01 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 11111111111111111111111111111 0 0% 100.0% 50 .. -- --- a 0% 100.0'/01 0 0% 100.0% O. 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0% 100.0% 0%! 100.0% EIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 2: 2% 100.0% 4' 4% 98.1 40 X X X 0 0 0 0 4 7% 94.4% X X X 0 0 ! 5 5% 87.9% t r 8 7% 83.2% 0 0 0 014 13% 75.7% T XXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 14% 62.6% 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 15% 48.6% XXXxXXx 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 _ r 14 13% 33.6% !Xxxx 0 0 1 7 7% 20.6% X X X 0 0 0 6% 14.0% X X 0 0 0 l 5� 5% 8.4% 30 X X 0 04 4% 3.7% 0 0% 0.0% II . t -_...,._.._ 0 0% 0.0% O 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 251= 0 0%_..,_ _. _ 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% ;111111111111111111111111111111111111111 '----- - O 0% 0.0% 11111111111111111111111111111 ___ o 0% :: 0.0% 111111111111111111111111111 -• _____. O 0% 0.0% 20: _.__._ .. ....- 0 0% 0.0% ill 0 0%1 0.0% 0 0%1 0.0% ------- _- _--_......•_.-•-,- t •- 0 0%i 0.0% 15I 0 0% 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 1071 100 `f`��� Page 68 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MIRALESTE DRIVE Date e/25/2012 50th% 35 MPH Limits PALoS yEnosSoRsZOVIA ooL/m/rA Begin 11:0e End 11:48 85th°/0 38 MPH Surveyed at 4064 MIRALESTE DR(EB) Weather _ CLEAR Average 35 MPH Surveyed at 4031 MIRALESTE DR(WBRecorded by J.L. loMPH 30 39 Direction EASTBOUND&WESTBOUND %in Pace 92% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of I Percent ofl Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles / Total . Percenta.e 65 . _____~ m�. 100.0% 0% 100.0% 0% 100.0% �� ---- — _ o 0% 100.0%_ . ~ 0% _ 60 ___ _ _ . _ _ __ ____ _ 0% 100.0% ___ ^ -- ^ ss 0 100.0% ' .. o 0% 1noo ._ _. o 0% �oo.0% ` . o 0%1 100.0%^ . . . . . 0 0% 1ono� ao _ , . . . . ` . _ . _ n. me. 100.0% . o. 0%. 1oo�� _ . . 0 0% �o100.0%� . _ _ . . . _ v �-- ____ __ -__ __-__ . 4s' 0 " m�m� _ y `_ _ ._______ _ ` 1%\ 100.0% __ _ __ _________._ 2% 99.1% o/ 2% 97.2% ------ �— -- *o x x 0 -------- 3.7. -- eoom* __ _ __ _� 1 x x x o. o 0 o . _ _ r 7% sou% x x x x o 0 0 0 o _ ` _ . o~__. am *5.8% x x x 0 0 0 0 0 8 e* 77,4% X'x x x x xxx 0 n o'o --t ' ^ ' ' - ' `o' 11%1 69.8% oo.x x xx`x xx x x o o o oo o o o ' 17' 1ua5% .x x_x x.x^x 0 0 0 0o 0 0 13 12m 42.5% xx x xxo.00 o o .n . 11 10u 30.2% X x x.X. 0 0_o o l _ . 8 8% 19.8%, X X 0 o. o 0 . 6 6%, 12.3m 30 xxo 0, o.o_ . , . . a 6.6% o _ _ _ _ .1 _ _ _ ~ ` m 0.9% ME III _______ 0 m� 0.0% 1 .. _ 0 om/ 0.0%o 0% 0.0% 25 ____ _ o%_ q�� ' . . _ ni 0� oom ^ ` o. 0%�' 00% _ ._ 0 �0%' 0.0% ' ' o — 0.0% oo' 0 0%1 0.0%. Ill li | . , , t 0 0 0 oomm0% oooo��0.0%i / o o��I 4, 1 ! | i t 1 I | IIo �m0.0%15 | | i : | | ' i 1 | . l | \ ! ! / | / | / % �� x-���� o'���B� Total Observed . 1061 100 .^/ /// = Page 69 of 82 Resolution No. 2014~48. Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MIRALESTE DRIVE Date 9/25/2012 50th% 37 MPH Limits VIA COLINITA TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT Begin 15:45 End 16:12 85th% 40 MPH Surveyed at 4405 MIRALESTE DR Weather CLEAR Average 37 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by J.L. 10MPH 33 42 %in Pace 90% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 510 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percenta+e 65 U RFU IIIIUIIIIIRU» 1 0 0%, 100.0% 11111111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0 0% 100.0% U. r_ 0- 0%, 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0%'' 100.0% 601111111111111111E111111111111111 0 0% 100.0% 111111 11�� � ■� 0, 0%' 100.0% IIIIHIIIIIIINIIIrIIwIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII0 0% 100.0% 1111 �1111�, 1111� 111111 0, 0%, 100.0%. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 11 0, 0%1 100.0% 55 U• RUUSNRU U IIIIWIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIII a 0% 100.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIrIIIIIIIII0, . 0% 100.0% •UR � a� R U UUR�1 0 0°/n 100.0% lI�� ���� 111111111111111 __. 0 __- 0% --- 00.0% 11111111111111111111101111111111111111111111 �II� _. _.............._0 0% 100.0% 50 II� II�� • • ••,•� 0 0% 100.0% UUUURRRUU_. • U 0 0% 100.0% 1111111111111111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111111110 0%E 100.0% 1111111111111111111 111111111Aall T_ w._ 0 0% 100.0% � _ 0 0%! 100.0% 45.....,„„ri,„.... ..,„...,, 1 1%, 100.0% -. 1 1% 99.0% UOBU _ _ 3 3% 98.0%. 0 0 XXiii UUUUUU r� 4 4%, 95.0% XX 0 X 0 X �� UU. 61 6% 91.1% 40 ©Q X X 0 �11111111�� � 111 _ 8 8% 85.1% El 0 0 0 0 X aa.U.UU .1111111U UUU 8 8% 77.2% © 0 0 0 0 © o 0111131111.11111.1111.11111.11111111111111111111 11 11% - 69.3% 0 Q x 0 0 Q o 101013115113111111111111111111111111111111.11111111 U11111 13 13% 58.4% a.© 0 0 0 0 ©Qnie ,`©11111.01111.1111... . 13 13%. 45.5% 35©© o x 0 0 © 0IMO 013 U UU U 13_____ 13°A, 32.7 ©CH" 0 0 0 UU©UUUU 1111=11111=1111111111111111111111111 0 9%1 19.8% IR X 0 0 X 6 6°t° 10.9% 0 111111 11111111111111111111 - 3 3% 5.0% 0flUUUUUUUU U U _ 2 2% 2.0% 3C . � o, 0% 0.0% 0 0°l0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% UU�UUUUUU■II11IIIIIIIU1IflRU m 0_ 0% 0.0% 25 00%• 0.0% •,:111111111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111111.111 0 0%! 0.0% UII ■IMIIIUU'U U IM ■U 0 0% 0.0% UUU UUUUUUU ■ U UUU 0 0% 0.0% 'RIM 2111111111111.111111111.11111111111 11 0, _......._. 0 _ 0.0% o _ ...... :/;)1' a /i _Ira 1111/1.11111-11 .inillIMIIIII 111 . _III ._____ 0 0°I 0.0% ■ . 111 ____ 0; MI 11111 RILIMILINIMIll 1111111 0% 0.0% i5 . 11111 Mill 1111111111111111 oi OW 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed M 101i 100 ./. Page 70 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MONTEMALAGA DRIVE Date 9/25/2012 50th% 36 MPH Limits SILVER SPUR TO PVE CITY BOUNDARY Begin 13:00 End 13:41 85th% 39 MPH Surveyed at 5442 MONTEMALAGA DR(EB) Weather CLEAR Average 36 MPH Surveyed at ACROSS FROM 5400 MONTEMALAGA(WB) Recorded by J.L- 10MPH 32 41 Direction EASTBOUND&WESTBOUND %in Pace 91% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percentage 4 65 , , j _ 0, 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% � , _ r � _ ._ _ ._.... _. c 0 o 1 0 0% 100.0% I 0 0% 60 ... __...,_ ___... ___ _ .........- .....--4- 0 f 0% 100.0% 01 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0°!° __ril _.... °06' o°ice, 100 o°i° , o o°ia_ 1o0 0% 0 0% 100.0%1 ' 0 0% 100 0% 01 0°I0 100.0°l0 0 0% 100.0% o 0% 100.0% 50< I : .... _ 0 0%� 100.0% II, 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% . 0 0% 100.0% x 0 2 2%i 100.0% _ �__.___.__ 0 0% 98.1% X X XX X0 07 7% 98.1% 40 X X X 0 0 0 6 6% 91.4% X X X X X 0 0 0 0 0 01 10% 85.7%, X X X X X X 0 0 0 00 012 l 11% 75.2%, x X X X X o 0 00 0 0 0 0 I , . , 12 11%- 63.8% X X X X X X X X.0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13%, 52.4% 35 x xA x x x x 0 0*0�00 0 - _ _ 12 11%l 39.0% X X X 0 0 0 0 0 i8 8%.1 27.6% X X X 0 0 0 07 7% 20.0% X X X 0 0 0 07' 7% 13.3% X X X X 051 5°/0 6,7% 30 X 02 2% 1.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0%' 0.0% 250 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0,0% 0. 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% + l , 4 1 , I _ . 20 0 0% 0.0% 40% 0.0% _ 0 0% 0.o% 0 0% 0.0% , o i L 1 1 _ _ , , , oi L___ _..............___2(__East bound 0-West Bound Total Observed 105 100 ..... 0%, 00% r A ___.... ...... .... Page 71 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH Date 9/26/2012 50th% 41 MPH Limits 1,300'WHO SCHOONER TO LA CITY LIMIT Begin 10:27 End 11:16 85th% 44 MPH Surveyed at 200'W/O CONQUEROR DR(EB) Weather CLEAR Average 41 MPH Surveyed at 100'E/O CONQUEROR DR(WB) Recorded by J.L. 10MPH 37 46 Direction EASTBOUND&WESTBOUND ' in Pace 90% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percenta•e 65 UUIURUIIIUIIIIIIU•SUUUUIIIIIIIRUIIII 0 0% 100.0°/p 11�11���111111��11����� ���11�� 0. 0% 100.0% uuuuuuaaamaaauuuuuum _ 0, 0% 100.0% �� 0 0% 100.0% 1111111111111111111111111111111.11111 •111111.1111111111 0, 0% 100.0% E�,t1 0, 0%_ 100.0% �� 0 0%' 100.0% 11IIIIII�II ■■.IIII� �■II�� 0 0% 100,0% 111111111111111111111111110. 0% 100.0% 111111111111111111 ■ 0 0%. 100.0% 55 R.SURIIIIRRRRR� RR ■ 0, 0% 100.0% 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111rr 0' 0% 100.0°/O �� ��� �� 1111111111 �11r11� 0 _. 0% 100.o% •URURRR��R�11RURRRR ��RRR 0 0% 100.0% �1111rrl 11111 �rrr� r1r1�r rrl� rIIIIrIIr 1% 00.0% 50 a 0 0"/a 99.0% 0 U% 99.0% Buillin 2 2°l0� 99.0°1a 1 1% 97.1°l0 a■ 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 MIME :_ 2 2% 96.1% 45 11111313111111311011111111111111111111 1111111111111111=11111111111111111111111111111 6, 6% 94.2% X X M0....0 0 0 _ 10 10% 88.3% X X X X 0 0 0 0 ■ 12 12% 78,6% 1©�C1 �© i 0 n o 0 MIME 11111111111111111 111111111 14 14% 67.0% ©nCI©EMEI 0 d 0 a nnin1111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111 13 13% 53.4% 40© E1©d111101 0 0 0 mannmunnummilell14.v_ 14% �r 40.8% EIMMEMEI 0 fl 0 0 0 0 0 II� �II� _ __ 1212% 27.2 3 /a ° 11113111111110 0 © 0' 1111111 1 � e .._ a8% 15.5% 0 0 2 2% 7.8% X O 2 2% 5.8°/n 35111101111111 .UR�U■U■UUUUU � UURU 3 3% 3.9% 1 1% 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 1��r���� �� 0! 0% 0.0% Ill I /1111111/1/1111111111111111 I 30 � ���� � �� 0 0% 0.0% UU MIN 11111111111111111111101111111111111111111 ENE 0, 0% 0.0% 1111 11111111111111•111111 U0_ 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% UU�ll ■UUUUUU �UUUU 0 0% 0.0% 25 U 0. 0% 0.0% UUUUUUUUU� U .__. 0 0°l0_...... 0.0% ■UUUUUUU� U 0 0% 0.0% .U.U000U U UU 0 _.. 0% 0.0% 20 11111111111111111111M11111111111111.1111 UU II- 0 o%, 0._.o% �aUUUUUM�UUU UUU 111 II 0 o% o.o% i ' 1 i o o% ° o.o% o o°i44 11111111111111 t Q 0% o.o% X-East bound 0 West Bound Total Observed 103j 100 ``� Page 72 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH Date 9/26/2012 50th°%a 38 MPH Limits i 500*EiO SEACOVE To 1;goo*wo SCHOONER Begin 10:00 End 10.23 85th`'l0 41 MPH Surveyed at SOUTH BAY ARCHERY CLUB Weather CLEAR Average 38 MPH Direction EASTBOUND&WESTBOUND Recorded by J.L. 10MPH 33 42 °%°in Pace 91% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percentage 65 ° 0% 100.0% 0' 0% 100.0% IMMMINIMMOIMMINIMMIMMIUMMIM11111 _ _........_fl....._.._ ........._0% ........... 100.0% MEMMINIMMINIMMIIMMINIMMMEMMEM 0 0% 100.0% 1111 ■■■1■■■■■■1■1 1111■ Miumm _ 0 0% 100.0% 60■ ■ ■ ■ _......o. o%� 100.0% �� ■� 0 0% 100.0% ■UU■■■■■■■1■ ■ ■ ■ ■11UU■■ 0! 0% 100.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■ O 0% 100.0% UUUUUUUUUUUNUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU 0' 0% 100.0% 55 ...__ ■ ■ ■ ■1 ■1■■■■■■■ 0 0% 100.0% I ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■r■■■■ 0 0% 100.0% 11 1111111111111111 0 0% 100.0% 111 11111111111111111111111 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50- 1 III 11111111111111111111111 Ot 0% 100.0% 01 0% 100.0% 0 0°l0 100.0°l0 _ 111111111111111111111111111 0 0% 100.0% ......... a 0% 100.0°l0 45 q11111111111111111"1111 1 1% 100.0% X 0 e......................31 3% 99.0% x 0 3 3% 96.0% 0 }( 0 0 II 11111 5 5% 93.1% 1010 ©■■■■■■■■■■■■111■1■■11■■■■ 5 5% 88.1% 401 0 Q©1i © 0 1■■■■■UU■ ■■ ■ ■■ ■■■■11■r 7 7% 83.2% 11© 01©©1aa1©oo■■ ■■■■■■■■■1■r■■ 14 14% 76.2% 111© 0 CHNIEMINI 0■11■■■■■■■■■■■■ 15% 62.4% •UB ■■ ©©U©UU© 1f ■ ■■■ 11 ■■■■r■■■■ 11 12% 47.5% 0 0 © 0 ■ . ©tea 0 d■1111■■■■■■■■■1111 12% 35.6% 35.11n©11 o f10 ■■■U■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■ 11% 23 8% p IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 61 6% 12.9% p 5 j 5%1 6.9% p 2 2%! 2.0% 30 1111111........ S 000% 0.0% 111111111 1111111 I I 0 0% 0.0°l0 0 o°i° 0.0°i° 2511111111111111111111111111111 5 ■ 1 ■■ ■■r 0 o%10.0%■ ■ ■1 ■■■ 0 0% 0.0% ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■■■■■■■ 0. Q% 0.0 UMMMINIMMEMOMMEMMINIMMEMMEMMEMMIN 00% 0.0% ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ 0 0%, 0 0% 20nommoomomomm 0 o°i°! 0.0% 0 0%i 0.0% ■■■■■■■■r1111■■■■■r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 0' 0% 0.0% ■■■1U1■■■r■■1■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■ 1111■ 0 0%, 0.0/o 15 ! 0 0% 0.0% X-East bound 0-West Bound Total Observed 101. 100 / ,� j, Page 73 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street RIDGEGATE DRIVE Date 9/25/2012 50th% 28 MPH Limits HAWTHRONE BLVD TO HIGHRIDGE RD Begin 13:50 End 14.31- 85th% �_ 32 MPH Surveyed at 100'W/O RIDGEBLUFF CT Weather CLEAR Average 28 MPH Direction EASTBOUND&WESTBOUND Recorded by J.L. 10MPH 23 32 %in Pace 85% MPH ' NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of Percent of I Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Vehicles Total Percenta•e 65 ■ uaummormumni0 0% 100.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIII III 11111111111111111 0 0% 100.0% 111III 1 o 0% 100.0°l0 II -.. 0! 0%..°..___ 100.0% 60` 0 ............................. :://000 100.0%ad Mil i 11111 III ...II Illimmi.1111111.1 Illi 11111.111111N11____ -+ 00 _110.0 _rillie III a _.._ Q% 110.0% IMINIIIIMIN0 0% 100.0% ••••• �• • •••• 0 : _ 0%. 100.0% 55 IIIIIIIIIMII 111111 11111 0 0% '100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0%; 11� ����� 11�11�11�11�� 0 0% 100.0% ����� I111111111111.11111111111=11111111111111111111111111111111111 � ���� ��II�� 0 0% 100.0%� 50 I . 1.1111111111111111111111101.1111111111111 0 0% 100.0% . .. o 0%+ 100.0% 11r. 11111111111111111 -11111111 �R ... 0 j 0%! 100.0% iuiiiiii 0 0% 100.0% ---_�Illill 1 - _ 0 0°Io__- 100.0% 45 UUUUU __.�.._..-..__ 1111111111 a 0°/Q 100.0°l° 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1111111111 � ������ ■ o 1- _.W _..... 0% 1 oa.0°i° 0Will111111111111111111111111 11111 0% 100.0% 40 IIIIIIII�II� o 0% 100.0% ■��Mrr�rrr�rr rrIIIr rrrrr II 01 0% 100.0% IMIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIII IIIIIIII 0' 0% 100.0% IIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII0 0% 100.0%. 0 0% 100.0% 35 0 I IIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 3 3°1° 100.0% ©© 0 111111111111 =11111111111111111 111111 3 3% 97.2% Q©©1:111 111111 11111111111 1111111111111111 1111111 5' 5%' 94.3% + IN 0 x 8 6% 89.6%0 8 8%, 84.0% 30 0 1 1 10%� 76.4% ©©©©D X a III X . 11111111111111111•11111111111111111111111 9 8% 66.0% ©©© + © X 0 El 0 X111111111.1111111E11111 _. 10 9%y..........__ 57.5°l0 � 0 . 0 + 0 X � 10 9% 48.1% Ell 0 ©©a 0 X 0 fUU U�II�U�U 10%. 38.7% 25©�' o .+ 0MI 0 111111 _. __._.......-.... -. 8% 28.3%+n,, 0 ©.+ . + ©a ... 1111111111611111 91 $/° 19,8% x o 0 0 X 0 7% 11.3% 0 x 3°I° 4.7°l° 1 1% 1.9%20:. 1 1% 0.7% II1IIIIIIIIi11.11111 f 0 0% 0.0%O 0% 0.0% OEM ._. NUM ...� MEM 0I0% 0.0%• . 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111 0, 0%1 0.0% ; 15 111111111111 11111111 1111 1111111111 0 0% 0.0% X-East bound _ 0-West Bound Total Observed 106 100 , Page 74 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street VIA VICENTE./CALLE ENTRADERO Date 9/26/2012 50th')/0 31 M P H Limits PALOS VERDES DR W TO P.V.DR W Begin 7:46 End 9:46 85th% 36 MPH Surveyed at 1,200'N/O CALLE VIENTO Weather CLOUDY Average 31 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND&SOUTHBOUND Recorded by J L 10MPH 28 37 % in Pace 72% MPH I NUMBER OF VEHICLES Number of I Percent of r Cumulative 1 I 5 10 15 25 30 Vehicles Total Percenta•e I 65 III� 1111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0 o% 100.0% IIIIIMIMMRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIINIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0, 0% 100.0% ■1111111111111d11111111111 r111��,r1rn�� 0 0% 100.0% 11 0 0% 100.0% I 1111111111 11111111111 O 0%4 100.0% HiQ 0 0%! 100.0°l0 O 0% 100.0°l0 O 0°l0 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% o 0% 100.0% 55 1111111111111111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 oi 0% 100.0% 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0 0% _.... 100.0% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIo ° ...--- 0 0%1 100.0 to 1111111111111111111=11111111111111111MINI111111111111111 111 II 0 0% 100.0% 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111r 110 0% - 100.0% O 0% 100.0°l0 0 0% 100.0% 11111 1111111111111111111111111 0 0% 100.0% IIIlIIIIllHhIIlIIIIIflhIIiIiI 0 0% 100.0% o 0%1 100.0% 45 1111 NRNrr� NSr ■NNNNRNNNN■ 0 0%_ 100.0% r 11111111111 Ur■ 00001 0% 10000000::0% �� 0% 0%0% 0°l00%� o°r°400 2°�° .o°ra CIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUIIM2%1 98.3% 1 0 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU 3% 96.6% 0 YI UUUU111111UU UU 3 5% 93.1% UMIIIIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIMMIIIIIMMI1111111111111111111111111111111 II 2 3% 87 9% 351111111111111111111111111111111111111111 U.------ 4 7% 84-5% BanEI � U 5 9%! 77.6% O ■1 ��■ 5 9_%� 69.0% © � 0 0 � �������� 5 9% 60.3% AV ��r59%i51.7% 30 11 6 10% 43.1% a 0 0 131111111111111111 UUU� ■UUUUUUUUUUUU 4 7% 32.8% O©0 m ■UUUUUUUUUUUU 3 5% 25.9% nfl 0 momma r UUUUUUUUUUUU 3 5% 20.7% ' 0 X 2. 3% 15.5% 25 X X 2 3% 12.1% X X 2 3% 8.6% X X 4 ! l 111111111111 2 3% 5.2% X i 1 1 2% 1.7% • ' , 0 0% 0.0% 20'UUUUUUUUU II III UUUUU linii• 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 11� UUUUUUUUUUnUUUU 11 111111111111 0 0% 0.0% UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU ! 0 0% 0.0% 15 UUUUUU■ ■UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU 0 0%! 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 58; 100 /%/ Page 75 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY FOR TRUCKS Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date October 9, 15, 16.2012 50th% 36 MPH Limits SILVER SPUR RD TO RHE CITY LIMIT Day 1 10:35 To 12:45 85th% 44 MPH Surveyed at 1000'S/O BLACKHORSE ROAD Day 2 12:20 To 15:05 Average 36 MPH Direction NORTHBOUND Day 3 8:15 To 9:55 10MPH 29 38 Recorded by F.P Weather CLEAR %in Pace 50% MPH NUMBER OF TRUCKS Number of l Percent of ! Cumulative I 5 10 15 20 25 30 Trucks Total Percentage T 65 - - 0 0%, 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0°/a 100.0% 0 0°/4 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60E1 0 0% 100.0% 0' 0% 100.0% 4 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 0% 100.0% _ . _ , 0 i 0% 100.0% O 0% 100.0% O 0% 100.0% O 0%, 100.0% 500 0/° 100.0% x x x 3 5% 100.0% o 0% 94.8% X X2 3% 94.8% .... ............................................ X X2 3% 91.4% 45 1, °1° 2%. 87.9 2 3% 86.2°1° X X X X5 _ 4 7% 82.8% X X 2 3%, 75.9% i o 0%1 72.4% 40i X X t X 3 5% 72.4% X X X3 5% 67.2% •X X X X4i 7% 62.1% j _ 01 0% 55.2% X X X X 4 7% 55.2% 35 X X X X_X _ 1115 9% 48.3% X X + 2 3% 39.7% X �. 1 2% 36.2%......-_.........-- .... �. +_._____...._..---....,._-__.__ -*.- X1 ._. ........ _. - --.......... Xi 1 2°1° 34.5% X X X ' 3 5/° 32.8% 30 X X X X X S 5 9% 27.6% X X X X - I f 4' 7% __ 19.0% X X X 3 5% 12.1% ----,- W.- s - -4 - ____-_ X X2 3% 5.2% 25:x 01 0/0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0%: 20 0 0% 0.0% =Ill- 0 0% 0.0%. ------..__._ . _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% i 0 0% 0.0% 15 IIIIIIIIII 01 0% 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed - 581 100 r . Page 76 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES SPOT SPEED SURVEY FOR TRUCKS Street HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD Date 10/15/12 and 10/16/12 50th% 33 MPH Limits RHONE DR TO PALOS VERDES DR WEST Day 1 8:10 To 12:10 85th% 40 MPH Surveyed at 200'N/O DUPRE DRIVE Day 2 10:00 To 15:15 Average 35 MPH Direction SOUTHBOUND Weather CLEAR 10MPH 31 40 Recorded by F.P. % in Pace 61% MPH 1 NUMBER OF TRUCKS Number of 1 Percent of ' Cumulative 5 10 15 20 25 30 Trucks Total Percentage 65i 0 0%. 100.0% a 0% 100.0% 01 0% 100.0% 0 0°l0 100.0% _ 0 0 100.0°/o 600__.....__......__..__._...�........_....__......._......_ .. 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 01 0% 100.0% 0' 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0• 0% 100.0% 0 _ t 4 1, 4% 100.0% 0 0% 96.4% ,.0 .._,. 1 4% 96.4% 0 0% 92.9% 45 0 0% 92.9% Q..........,........ T1 4%� 92.9% . t ... _ . ... ... « T - ......-._........-._..._...___,........-4....._ __a__ 0, 0%.__. 89 3% ' -- _..._ ►......-��. 0 __.... 0% 89.3% 0 0% 89.3% 40 0 0 0 3 11% 89.3% O 0 0 04 14% 78.6% O 0 0 3• 11% 64.3% o 0% 53.6% 0 0% 53.6% 35 01. 4% 53.6% 0 0% 50.0% O 0 0 _ 3, 11% 50.0% 0 0 21 7% 39.3% 01 4% 32.1% 30 0 02 7% 28.6% 0 1 4% 21.4% 0 ............_......._..... w......-......... 1 4% 17.9% 111 .......�-. ........ ._............-............. 0 .____, �._...._! - 1 4% 14.3% 0 0 0 -_ 3 11% 10.7% ---,- 25m. ...._. _ .-- 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% € i 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 200 0%, 0.0% 0 0%4 0.0% 0 0%I 0.0% 10 0%1 0.0% o 0% 0.0% 15 j , C% 0%, 0.0% X-North bound 0-South Bound Total Observed 28 100 ����� Page 77 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A APPENDIX B Collision Rates Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 78 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A 1,1,':.,,:1\2,'.6\:,',;::.,Zfrrts'.,7:!,!.:!:::::,i:,',,,,,:-.;t::::2:1:7.:-;;;;;.4.:3:7:4-'.7.:."-...-..: ....':,...:.....,...,.................„.........,.....1.,...................,....„....,......,.........„..............,...,-,-:.,„.,.:„.::,, ...,:...,,...„..,....,:...,:::::::,::,:,.,...„..„:....„.:.:...:...„.:,„„:„.:.2.:-',:iiidi:-----Cyakijiate'd --.. ..Staiewiae ) . . . ...,,,,....:en:....,.t,h:,:.::0;...„:„.::::,...,,,,,;:„...:.,Acci ent a e cet :,,,,,.4.-",,::::t,:::,:,:-.,.. ..::,:-::::stv:::,:rvNewiwcia+0,:koitre.7*,,vittektitswimomaitststalsoi,itlemultsignempar.: . , . . . .... . , ..::... .A ,, :..,Lt,.,:..i.::!:.:.1/4:.,„L„,,,,,,,4jAggijAXMLA 1 CRENSHAW BLVD SEA CREST DR CREST RD O1'�� 0.4 0.00 2.55 - -- -----' 2 CRENSHAW BLVD CREST RD RHE CITY LIMIT 2 20.473 0.8 0.11 1.80 3 CREST RD HAWTHORNE BLVD CRENSHAW BLVD 0 10.368 1.6 0.00 1.60 ---' 4 CREST RD PALOS VERDES DR E GANADO DR 1 3,047 0.8 0.37 2.00 | ---- 5 CREST RD GANADO DR RHCITY LIMIT 0 707 0.8 0.00 2.55 6 CRESTRIDGE RD CRENSHAW BLVD H|GHR|D8ERO 4 6,917 0.5 1.06 2.55 7 FORRESTAL� PALOS\�O� ORS NORTH�R�|NUS 1 0.3 2.15 2.55 1,416 • | 8 GRANV|AALTAM}RA HAWTHORNE BLVD PVE CITY LIMIT 0 9.402 0.2 0.00 2.55 � | -1 9 HAWTHORNE BLVD PALOS VERDES DR W VALLON DR 2 15.205 1.0 0.12 1.60 0 • 10 HAWTHORNE BLVD VALLON DR CREST RD 3 16,241 1.0 0.17 1.60 .. 11 HAWTHORNE BLVD CREST RD EDD|NGH|LLDR 2 15,936 0.9 0.13 1.60 ! -- ----- | 12 HAWTHORNE BLVD EDO|NGH(LLDR HIGHRIDGE RD 5 18,944 0.8 0.30 1.80 13 HAWTHORNE BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD INDIAN PEAK RD 3 34,599 0.4 0.20 1.60 . 14 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 7 25,222 0.9 0.28 1.60 g 15 HIGHRIDGE RD HAWTHORNE BLVD RHE CITY LIMIT 0 8,749 0.8 0.00 2.55 D Z10 MIRALESTE DR PALOS VERDES DR E VIA COLINITA 4 6,352 0.6 0.96 2.55 N) 17 MIRALESTE DR VIA COLINITA LA COUNTY LIMIT 1 12.371 0.8 0.12 2.55 7-i.' r / -I' 18 MONTEMALAGADR �|UERS�RRO F� C� L|�� 1 8.�5 0.7 0.19 2.55 n ____ m 19 PALOS VERDES DR S1,300VV/O SCHOONER DRLA CITY LIMIT 6 14.160 1.57 0.24 1.25 = (-IT: 20 PALOS VERDES DR Si.5OO E/O SEACOVE DR 1.300'W/0 SCHOONER DR 7 12.201 1.4 0.37 1.25 > . Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Pa/os Verdes M\. \\\\W w`\\O9:0t \ �����\\t4 ��\�\\��� � ��pp�� ••\�\���,'��i TQC i.4v �.S.U\���♦ YA""Et****. .**n .'.".'R�\.,.\. `Y��♦,� „�t O\2 a�♦.,.@w:ht. .......\�,n.... .,♦ .., 11, • .:n.... ....,.........n,..1.v...................a,..............,.,.....................................::.........'..::..........."....."..:.......:......:.... :".-:..,.-...,..v...:......�..,n:.:,:..:.::.............. ......... ........:.:....n.....:...:..:....:.,..:4a.:a,.:h.:,v..v\.♦:r,..•..h:......a.v....♦...mv:4,-a:♦:♦:-.a:v.:,..ay...a.avv..v..av\:n.a.v..\-:v:..w\.,av:,:a:...a;a4..v.♦.♦w,v:v:., ::w\::n}::i•:4n:h-::i::w::,:.v:.:i.:.:..v.\.a.v..:..,.:.:•:.,,••.\v:...t.+-\?:v..v:,:v::.,.t• .wv:..::♦r.:..:.a..:n..:: ..:•..:n.-v..::::n. ::nwv:: :,.'na .nn ,.. vMCtihwn \d :h: ?v •v -vv. . J } : ...:. h n. \\ . \v , aa♦ \ va\ \ \ oi. ; .:: i k : v .. g of M � � Rate Accident �v h n ♦ nh \ a , �rnvawuv:'r^ . ,.. ..t. .; � a.. ah.'�a,-::,..:::.,.:ice♦. ��C....a-:.♦:...a.::::::.-:: ,. .a........\..'?\,•:.•..t.:h•.:�:..::::::::'>i:.::..:::::::.::::.:...♦:i: 21 RIDGEGATE DR HAWTHORNE BLVD HIGHRIDGE RD 0 1,721 0.5 0.00 2.55 22 VIA VICENTECALLE ENTRADERO PALOS VERDES DR W PALOS VERDES DR W 0 297 0.9 0.00 2.55 (0 O TRUCK SPEED ZONE ON DESCENDING GRADES co 0 • 23 HAWTHORNE BLVD SILVER SPUR RD RHE CITY LIMIT 0 25,222 0.9 0.00 1.60 co -�a " 24 HAWTHORNE BLVD RHONE DR PALOS VERDES DR W 0 15,265 2.57 0.00 1.60 REDUCED SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMITS 25 BAYEND DR GENERAL ST CRESTWOOD ST 0 934 0.09 0.00 2.55 • 26 CRESTWOOD ST UPLAND ST BAYEND DR 0 1,460 0.14 0.00 2.55 27 GENERAL ST CRESTWOOD ST BAYEND DR 0 2,768 0.19 0.00 2.,55 o Z 0 N 0 00 m X 0 D Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes APPENDIX C Survey Equipment Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 81 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements for this survey was two Genesis VersaPak Hand-Held traffic Radar manufactured by Decatur Electronics, of Decatur, Illinois. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of each unit were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Both Genesis VersaPak Hand Held Traffic Radars were last calibrated on November 28, 2012 by R.H. F, Inc. Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes Page 82 of 82 Resolution No. 2014-48, Exhibit A