RDA RES 1989-014 RESOLUTION RDA 89-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO PALOS VERDES
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTING FISCAL
YEAR 1989-90 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Board of the Rancho Palos Verdes
Redevelopment Agency desires to adopt the following
resolution adopting the operating and capital budget for next
fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE BOARD OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY ADOPT THE FOLLOWING 1989-90
OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET.
Section 1: An operating and capital budget for Fiscal
Year 1989-90 is hereby adopted as contained in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated and referenced as part of
this resolution.
Section 2: Upon adoption of said Budget, the Board may
revise and/or update said Budget in part or in its entirety,
depending upon the Agency' s fiscal resources, circumstances
and needs.
Section 3 : The Executive Director of the Rancho Palos
Verdes Redevelopment Agency shall be responsible for
administration and execution of said Budget and shall
annually recommend to the Agency Board prior to June 10th of
each fiscal year the next Fiscal Year Budget.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of June,
1989.
Or l� r
i3-l'aA4C6/4.a_cj"—
AGENCY CHAIRPERSON
1,AT •
AGE CY SECRETARY
State of California
County of Los Angeles ) ss
City of Rancho Palos Verdes }
I , JO PURCELL, Agency Secretary of the Rancho Palos
Verdes Redevelopment Agency hereby certify that the above
Resolution No. RDA 89-14 was dul and larly passed and
adopted by the said Redevelopment • •ency a a r.egul. ••eeting
thereof held June 20, 1989.
A ENCY SECRETARY
litilik■
RANCHO PALOS VERDES
Executive Director' s Fiscal Year 1989-90 Budget Message REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
July 1 , 1989
HONORABLE RANCHO PALOS VERDES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
30940 Hawthorne Boulevard
Rancho Palos Verdes, California
Dear Agency Members:
Presented herein is the adopted budget of the Redevelopment Agency of Rancho Palos Verdes
for the Fiscal year 1989-90. As presented, this document provides for the necessary and
desired services and improvements as previously established by agency policies and direc-
tives.
Similar to the previous budgets presented by this administration, agency staff has forged
a document that presents the city's financial data in a well organized and readable for-
mat. I believe this budget reflects my philosophy of what a budget should be . . . a
management tool from which sound fiscal management decisions may be made.
GENERAL OVERVIEW
The general financial condition for the Redevelopment Agency of Rancho Palos Verdes for
Fiscal Year 1989-90 is delicate. The budget is balanced but with only limited funds to
meet any unexpected contingency. The combined total revenue base for the RDA is
$10,831,000.
•
This year ' s fiscal plan presents a $206 , 500 Portuguese Bend Landslide budget and a
$2,250,000 budget for Abalone Cove.
Ending fund balances for Portuguese Bend will be $13 , 850 while a fund balance of
$8,270,000 is projected for Abalone Cove to be used for future projects.
-128-
E NM INIIII MI MN M MN M MI MN MI MN MI OM MB MN MI N M
OMNI MEI IMO IMO IMO EMI IMO MEI MEI NMI IMO IOW IMMO MEI IMO MEI IMO NMI IMP
OPERATIONS
1. Portuguese Bend Landslide. The budget provides for no new projects within the Por-
tuguese Bend Landslide area. The programmed operations are austere and reflect minimal
services to effectively administer projects, maintain drainage, roads and wells within the
area of the Portuguese Bend Landslide. $31,380 is loaned to the Agency to balance the
budget and will be part of the long term debt of the agency to the City of Rancho Palos
Verdes. The program as presented represents approximately a 66% decrease over the planned
projects over the past 3 years. The RDA is actively seeking additional monies to fund
much needed projects in the landslide area.
2. Abalone Cove. The budget appropriated accommodates administration, maintenance and
other related services. In particular, up to 16 tasks have been identified for long range
consideration, of which 9 have been programmed in the 1989-90 fiscal year. These tasks
are consistent with the Horan settlement and are recommended for completion by the agency
through the technical panel. Planned programs in 1989-90 account for approximately 20% of
the total funds available for all projects.
CONCLUSION
The adopted budget for Fiscal Year 1989-90 represents a financial plan to meet the year's
obligations and challenges. The budget is balanced and contains those necessary services
and improvements consistent with the agency's ability to finance them on a cash basis.
Toward this end, the assistance and guidance of the City' s Redevelopment Agency Board is
greatly appreciated.
On behalf of the agency staff, I wish to express our gratitude to the Board for their con-
tinued support.
Sincerely,
C
Dennis McDuffie
)040
Executive Director
-129-
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO PALOS VERDES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ADOPTING FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Board of the Rancho Palos Verdes Redevelopment Agency desires to adopt
the following resolution adopting the operating and capital budget for next fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE BOARD OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY
ADOPT THE FOLLOWING 1989-90 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET.
Section 1 : An operating and capital budget for Fiscal Year 1989-90 is hereby adopted
as contained in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated and referenced as part of this
resolution.
Section 2: Upon adoption of said Budget, the Board may revise and/or update said
Budget in part or in its entirety, depending upon the Agency' s fiscal resources,
circumstances and needs.
Section 3 : The Executive Director of the Rancho Palos Verdes Redevelopment Agency
shall be responsible for administration and execution of said Budget and shall annually
recommend to the Agency Board prior to June 10th of each fiscal year the next Fiscal Year
• Budget.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1989.
/S/ JACKI BACHARACH
AGENCY CHAIRPERSON
-130-
I I 11111111 N 111111 111111 M MI 111111 I I I MN I M 1111111 I M MI
_ CITIMOFCHOLOMRDNEDEVELOP T AG EN CY
DEPARTMENT OPERATING STATEMENT
BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1990
DEPARTMENT: PORTUGUESE BEND LANDSLIDE - NO. 825
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL & BUDGET BUDGET
SUBJECT REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE APPROP. ESTIMATED REQUEST APPROP.
CODE REVENUE CLASSIFICATION 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 FY 89-90 1989-90
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 2, 000, 000 2, 013, 950 902,756 553, 185 ( 265, 489) ( 122,032) ( 122, 032)
PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 0 0 52,841 35,000 0 311,000 311 , 000
INTEREST EARNINGS 26,668 67,175 25, 377 50, 000 25,000 0 0
OTHER REVENUE 0 0 1, 350 300, 000 1,110,457 0 0
CDBG REIMBURSEMENT 0 0 0 154, 220 0 0 0
CITY LOAN TO RDA 0 0 0 0 42,000 0 31, 382
TOTAL REVENUES 2, 026,668 2, 081,125 982, 324 1, 092,405 911,968 188,968 220, 350
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL & BUDGET BUDGET
SUBJECT EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE APPROP. ESTIMATED REQUEST APPROP.
CODE EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 FY 89-90 1989-90
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
. 30 LEGAL SERVICES 0 22, 301 196, 436 5, 000 24,500 62, 000 54, 000
TECHNICAL PANEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,000
.37 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 60,743 14,253 34,560 5,000 87, 000 43,500 40, 000
. 38 DEWATERING 7, 127 110, 931 28, 332/ 30,000 27, 000 5,000 5,000
.39 ADMINISTRATION - ENGINEERING 24, 245 60,540 214,481 30, 000 28,500 20, 250 19,000
.58 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS 0 0 0 25, 000 23, 000 27, 500
27, 500
.74 GRADING, DRAINAGE 77,858 904,158 652,672 800, 000 835, 000 35, 000 35, 000
.84 GENERAL OPERATION & MAINT. 11 ,657 48,757 121, 332 45,000 9, 000 10, 000 10, 000
.92 CONTINGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 17,100 10, 000
TOTAL-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 181,630 1,160,940 1,247,813 940, 000 1 , 034,000 220, 350 206, 500
ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,845, 038 920, 185 65,489) 152,405 ( 122,032) ( 31, 382 ) 13, 850
-1
CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES
JUSTIFICATION SHEET
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - PORTUGUESE BEND LANDSLIDE
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 825-825
EXPENSE CODE ; ITEM, DESCRIPTION, & JUSTIFICATION : ESTIMATED COST
.30 ; LEGAL SERVICES - COST OF AGENCY ATTORNEY FOR REVIEW OF LEGAL ; 54, 000
DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS. THIS WOULD ALSO COVER THE COSTS OF '
ATTENDANCE AT RDA MEETINGS AND ADVICE TO THE AGENCY AND DIRECTORS.
THE PORTUGUESE BEND TECHNICAL PANEL IS CHARGED IN THIS AREA. ; 6, 000
ACTIVITY SHOULD BE LIMITED NEXT FISCAL YEAR.
.37 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION - THE COST OF ADMINISTERING EXISTING AND ; 40, 000
PROPOSED PROGRAMS WITHIN THE RDA. THIS INCLUDES NON-DIRECT '
ENGINEERING AND STAFF ADMINISTRATION TIME.
.38 DEWATERING - BUDGET FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING WELLS WITH NO ; 5,000
ADDITIONAL WELLS.
. 39 ; ADMINISTRATION/ENGINEERING - THE COST OF DESIGN REVIEW AND/OR : 19, 000
' PREPARATION OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE RDA, AND '
INSPECTION OF PROJECTS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO VERIFY CONTRACT '
' COMPLIANCE.
.58 : INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS - EXPENSES RELATED TO SEEKING LEGISLATION : 27 ,500
' AND REVENUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES. '
.74 : GRADING/DRAINAGE - THE COST OF GRADING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND : 35, 000
MAINTENANCE OF THE GABION PROTECTION PROJECTS WITHIN THE RDA.
.84 ; GENERAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE - THE COST OF MAINTAINING DRAINAGE : 10 , 000
' AND ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE RDA. THIS INCLUDES SURFACE '
DRAINS, WELL DRAIN LINES, WELL SITES, ELECTRICAL USAGE AND WELL '
' REPAIR.
.92 : CONTINGENCY - THIS REPRESENTS 10% OF THE GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES : 10, 000
' AS A RESERVE FOR NON-BUDGETED AND EMERGENCY PROJECTS. EXPENSES FROM :
THIS ACCOUNT WILL REQUIRE AGENCY BOARD APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY '
EXPENDITURE.
-132-
MIMI r 1111111 r - M OM OM MO N MO - - 111111 - - MI - I
=II IIIIII MEN =III NMI =III =III ONIII OM Mill MN MIIII NMI =II =II =II MEI =II =II
Assumption: 1.No new projects
PORTUGUESE BEND LANDSLIDE
5 YEAR PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
198.9-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94
ACCT DEPARTMENT EXEC.DIR. DEPARTMENT EXEC.DIR. DEPARTMENT EXEC.DIR. DEPARTMENT EXEC.DIR. DEPARTMENT EXEC.DIR.
NO RE VEST RECOMMEND REQUEST RECOMMEND REc REST RECOMMEND RECUEST RECOMMEND REQUEST RECOMMEND
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
.I GENERAL OPERATIONS
1. Administrative Services [l[1[l[1Llil [l[l[1[l[lll[1[l[1[l[l[lil[1[l[1[lil[lil[1[l[1[l [lllililj1[111I1LlIJI1Ll I1IlLli1I1I1J1I1IlI]L1I1 I1I1C11111[1
A. Engineering 0.39 8,700 8,000 8,900 8,800 26,000 17,600 53,000 35,200 60,000 42,000
B. Administration 0.37k 43,500. 40,000 47,500, 44 000 50,000 48,000 58 000 53 000 60 ,000 58,000
C.Inspection 0.39 4,300 4,000 4,450 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,500 4,400 4,500 4,400
2. LA County- Surveying 0.39 7,250 7,000 8,400 7,700 8,900. 7,700 10,000 8,400 11,000 9,200
3.Legal Services Il[ljl[1[ltJ jltill [l[lllil[l IUIl,[1[1[ijl[1[111[1[lfl
A.Routine 0.30 26,000 25,000 26,000 27,500 26,000 27,500 26,000 29,000 260,000 31,000
B. Litigation 0.30 26,000 25,000 ? ? ? ?
4. Del Smith 0.58 2,500` 2,500 0 0 0 0
5.Barna Szabo 0.58 25,000 2 5,0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6.Portuguese Bend Technical Panel 0.30 10 000 10 000 11 000 11 000 12 000 12 000 13 000 13 000 14 000 14 000
7.Contingency 0.92 17,100 10,000 12,000 11,000 14,700 12,000 18,500 13,000 20,000 14,000
Subtotal $170,350 $156,500 $118,250 $114,400 $142,000 $129,200 $183,000 $156,000 $429,500 $172,600
N MAINTENANCE
1. Dewatering Wells 0.38 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000
2.Road 0.74 25,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 400,000 400,000
3.Surface Drainage,Canyons 0.74 5,000 5,000 7,500 7,500 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000
4.Gabions 0.74 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000
Subtotal $40,000 $40,000 $73,500 $73,500 $135,000 $135,000 $250,000 $250,000 $465,000 $465,000
i a . ,
III PROJECTS 4 _ I
1. Horizontal Drains 0 0
2. Permanent Drainage Improvement 4111[1[11111 [ltl[1[1[1[111[1j1j1[1[111[j[1[1[lil [ljl[1[l[l[l [1111 1[1I1I11111I1IIIlILil[1I1L111I1 LIL1IIIl[lIIIllIIHII1[1,
A.Klondike Canyon 0 0
B.Portuguese Bend Canyon 0- 0 .
C. Paintbrush 0 0 _ ,
3. Land Acquisition 0 0
4. Earthwork 0 0
5. Shoreline Protection 0 0,
6.Gabion Extension 0 0
7.Revegetat ion 0.84 10,000 10,000
8. Wells 0 0 .
Subtotal $10,000 $10,000 _ _ - /
TO►TAI. $220,350 $206,500 $191,750 $187,900 $277,000 $264,200 $433,000 $406,000 $894,500 $637,600
Iv STUDIES 90 000 90 000
-133-
MK AbbEbbEU PERCENT EASE TUTAb TOTAL TAI 11; V1KL NET TAI TOTAL FUNDS EXPENDITURES DEBT OUTSTANDING OUTSTANDING OUTSTANDING COUNTY 204 FUNDS FOR
VALUE INCREASE VALUE INCREMENT INCREMENT (1%) DISTRICT INCREMENT AVAILABLE ON PROJECTS PAYMENTS DEBT DEBT DEBT DEBT RESERVE SET-ASIDE MAINTENANCE
1984 -85 22,281,988 ' 9.5% 22,281,988 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (COUNTY) (CITY) (COUNT! 2ND
1985 -86 24,614,680 ' 10.5% 22,281,988 2,332,692 23,327 3,966 19,361 21,104 0 0 350,319 ISSUE)
1986 -81 21,912,493 * 13.4% 22,281,988 5,630,505 56,305 9,572 46,733 73,942 0 0 378,344
1981 -88 35,283,599 ' 26.4% 22,281,988 13,001,611 130,016 22,103 107,913 198,223 0 0 408,655
1988 -89 39,810,461 13.0% 22,281,988 11,588,419 175,885 29,900 145,984 315,186 500,000 0 791,882
1989 -90 43,857,514 10.0% 22,281,988 21,575,526 215,155 36,678 179,077 9,793,146 2,000,000 0 10,150,000 855,233 254,026 49,009 311,000
1990 -91 41,366,115 8.0% 22,281,988 25,084,121 250,841 42,643 208,198 8,701,466 2,000,000 0 11,556,250 923,652 127,678 20,445 194,000
1991 -92 51,155,404 8.0% 22,281,988 28,813,416 288,134 49,085 239,649 7,470,355 2,000,000 0 12,422,969 997,544 146,966 23,534 282,000
1992 -93 55,241,836 8.04 22,281,988 32,965,848 329,658 56,042 273,617 6,006,529 2,000,000 0 13,354,691 1,077,347 167,196 26,869 434,400
1993 -94 59,661,663 8.04 22,281,988 37,385,675 373,857 63,556 310,301 4,218,845 1,500,000 0 14,356,293 1,163,535 190,293 30,472 666,500
1994 -95 64,441,016 8.0% 22,281,988 42,159,088 421,591 71,670 349,920 8,479,954 2,000,000 0 15,433,015 1,256,618 5,000,000 214,590 34,362
1995 -96 69,596,362 8.0% 22,281,988 41,314,314 413,144 80,434 392,709 7,671,203 2,000,000 0 16,590,491 1,357,147 5,375,000 240,830 38,564
1996 -97 75,164,011 8.0% 22,281,988 52,882,083 528,821 89,900 438,921 6,840,036 1,000,000 0 11,834,718 1,465,719 5,118,125 269,110 43,102
1991 -98 81,117,191 8.0% 22,281,988 58,895,209 588,952 100,122 488,830 6,988,464 0 0 19,112,381 1,582,977 6,211,484 299,111 48,003
1998 -99 81,611,313 8.0% 22,281,988 65,389,385 653,894 111,162 542,132 8,209,004 0 0 20,610,316 1,709,615 6,677,346 332,832 53,296
1999 -00 94,685,082 8.04 22,281,988 72,403,094 724,011 123,085 600,946 9,602,845 0 9,602,845 11,833,031 1,846,384 7,178,141 59,013
2000 -01 102,259,889 8.0% 22,281,988 79,977,901 199,719 135,962 663,817 0 598,630 12,016,981 1,994,095 7,116,508 65,181
2001 -02 110,440,680 8.0% 22,281,988 88,158,692 881,587 149,870 131,111 0 659,86s 12,213,403 2,153,622 8,295,246 71,855
2002 -03 119,275,934 8.0% 22,281,988 96,993,946 969,939 164,890 805,050 0 725,994 12,413,464 2,325,912 8,917,389 79,056
2003 -04 128,818,009 8.0% 22,281,988 106,536,021 1,065,360 181,111 884,249 0 797,416 12,481,252 2,511,985 9,586,193 86,833
2004 -05 139,123,450 8.0% 22,281,988 116,841,462 1,168,415 198,630 969,784 0 874,551 12,483,654 2,712,944 10,305,158 95,233
2005 -06 150,253,326 8.0% 22,281,988 127,911,338 1,279,713 217,551 1,062,162 0 957,858 12,390,230 2,929,979 11,078,045 104,304
2006 -01 162,273,592 8.0% 22,281,988 139,991,604 1,399,916 237,986 1,161,930 0 1,047,829 12,193,082 3,164,378 11,908,898 114,102
2001 -08 175,255,419 8.04 22,281,988 152,973,491 1,529,735 260,055 1,269,680 0 1,144,991 11,816,691 3,417,528 12,802,065 124,683
2008 -09 189,275,918 8.04 22,281,988 166,993,930 1,669,939 283,890 1,386,050 0 1,249,940 11,423,758 3,690,930 13,162,220 136,110
2009 -10 204,417,991 8.04 22,281,988 182,136,003 1,821,360 309,631 1,511,729 0 1,363,277 10,815,011 3,986,204 14,194,381 148,452
2010 -11 220,711,430 8.0% 22,281,988 198,489,442 1,984,894 337,432 1,647,462 0 1,485,682 10,029,035 4,305,101 15,903,966 161,181
2011 -12 238,433,145 8.0% 22,281,988 216,151,157 2,161,512 367,457 1,794,055 0 1,617,878 9,041,993 4,649,509 17,096,163 176,116
2012 -13 257,507,196 8.04 22,281,988 235,225,808 2,352,258 399,884 1,952,374 0 1,160,651 7,827,443 5,021,469 18,379,020 191,123
2013 -14 218,108,420 8.04 22,281,988 255,826,432 2,558,264 434,905 2,123,359 0 1,914,845 6,356,042 5,423,187 19,157,441 208,514
2014 -15 300,357,094 8.04 22,281,988 218,075,106 2,180,151 412,128 2,308,023 0 2,081,375 4,595,267 5,857,042 21,239,256 226,648
2015 -16 324,385,661 8.04 22,281,988 302,103,613 3,021,037 513,576 2,507,460 0 2,261,228 2,509,092 6,325,605 22,832,200 246,233
2016 -17 350,336,514 8.0% 22,281,988 328,054,526 3,280,545 557,693 2,122,853 0 2,455,468 57,645 6,831,654 22,146,191 267,384
2011 -18 318,363,435 8.0% 22,281,988 356,081,441 3,560,814 605,338 2,955,476 0 2,665,248 0 7,378,186 21,142,552 290,228
2018 -19 408,632,510 8.0% 22,281,988 386,350,522 3,863,505 656,196 3,206,709 0 2,891,810 0 7,968,441 19,836,433 314,899
2019 -20 441,323,111 8.04 22,281,988 419,041,123 4,190,411 712,370 3,478,041 0 3,136,498 0 8,605,916 18,187,668 341,544
2020 -21 416,628,960 8.0% 22,281,988 454,346,912 4,543,470 772,390 3,711,080 0 3,400,760 0 9,294,390 16,150,983 370,320
2021 -22 514,159,271 8.0% 22,281,988 492,471,289 4,924,773 837,211 4,087,561 0 3,686,163 0 10,031,941 13,616,144 401,399
2022 -23 555,940,019 8.04 22,281,988 533,658,031 5,336,580 907,219 4,429,362 0 3,994,398 10,840,916 10,101,451 434,963
2023 -24 600,415,220 8.0% 22,281,988 518,133,232 5,781,332 982,826 4,198,506 0 4,327,293 11,108,254 7,183,223 471,213
2024 -25 648,448,438 8.04 22,281,988 626,166,450 6,261,664 1,064,483 5,191,182 0 4,686,818 10,993,243 3,035,147 510,363
2025 -26 700,324,313 8.0% 22,281,988 618,042,325 6,180,423 1,152,612 5,627,751 0 5,075,106 6,191,596 0 552,645
2026 -27 156,350,258 8.04 22,281,988 134,068,210 7,340,683 1,247,916 6,092,767 0 5,494,457 1,846,947 0 598,310
2021 -28 816,858,219 8.0% 22,281,988 194,516,291 7,945,763 1,350,780 6,594,983 0 5,947,356 0 0 647,627
'REPRESENTS ACTUAL AS PROVIDED BY LOS ANGELES COUNTY
-134-
r M - - M r - - I E - -■■I = N - M r r MI
SPREAD SHEET EXPLANATION
YEAR - LISTED ARE FISCAL YEARS FROM 1984-85 THROUGH 2027-28 TO ILLUSTRATE THAT ALL DEBT WILL
BE REPAID.
ASSESSED VALUE - THE FIRST FOUR YEARS OF ASSESSED VALUATION REPRESENT ACTUAL PROVIDED BY LOS ANGELES
COUNTY. THE REMAINING YEARS ASSESSED VALUE REPRESENT AN INCREASE AT A GRADUALLY
DECREASING RATE AND LEVELED AT 8% PER YEAR IN FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 .
PERCENT INCREASE - ILLUSTRATES ACTUAL INCREASE FOR THE FIRST FOUR YEARS AND AN ESTIMATED INCREASE FOR
EACH YEAR THEREAFTER.
BASE VALUE - THE BASE VALUE REPRESENTS THE ASSESSED VALUE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN THE BASE
YEAR, 1984-85. IN ORDER TO CALCULATE THE TAX INCREMENT, THE BASE IS SUBTRACTED FROM THE
CURRENT VALUE TO ARRIVE AT THAT YEARS INCREMENTAL INCREASE.
TOTAL INCREMENT - AS STATED ABOVE, THE INCREMENT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BASE YEAR AND THE
CURRENT OR PROJECTED ASSESSED VALUE.
TOTAL TAX INCREMENT - THIS REPRESENTS 1% OF THE TOTAL INCREMENT.
17% FIRE DISTRICT - AS DIRECTED IN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, THE FIRE DISTRICT WILL RECEIVE ITS SHARE
OF THE INCREMENT OR 17%.
NET TAX INCREMENT - THE TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE AFTER THE FIRE DISTRICT'S SHARE IS REMOVED.
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE - UNTIL FUNDS ARE EXPENDED, THIS REPRESENTS FUNDS HELD BY THE COUNTY AND OR
CITY UNTIL NEEDED.
DEBT PAYMENTS - REPRESENTS ALL PAYMENTS MADE TOWARD THE DEBT OF THE AGENCY INCLUDING THE INITIAL
$10,000, 000 , A SECOND ISSUE OF $5,000, 000 AND FINALLY THE ACCUMULATED DEBT INCURRED
BY THE CITY THROUGH LOANS TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
OUTSTANDING DEBT - THE NEXT THREE COLUMNS REPRESENT DEBT OF THE AGENCY WHICH INCREASES EACH YEAR
UNTIL DEBT PAYMENTS ARE MADE.
COUNTY DEBT RESERVE - AS DIRECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, THE COUNTY IS ENTITLED TO 50. 9% OF THE
TAX INCREMENT WHICH WILL BE CREDITED TOWARD THE DEBT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE
11TH YEAR.
20% SET ASIDE - AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, THIS REPRESENTS A SET ASIDE EQUIVALENT TO 20% OF THE
REMAINING BALANCE AFTER REMOVING THE COUNTIES 50.9% AND THE FIRE DISTRICTS 17%.
FUNDS FOR MAINTENANCE - THESE ARE THE BALANCE OF FUNDS WHICH SHOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA UNTIL THE SECOND ISSUE IS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY.
-135-
CITY oF RANCHO PALOS VERDES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OPERATING STATEMENT
BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR YEAR ENDING JUNE 30,
DEPARTMENT: ABALONE COVE - NO. 830
ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL & BUDGET BUDGET
SUBJECT REVENUE APPROP. ESTIMATED REQUEST APPROP.
CODE REVENUE CLASSIFICATION 1987-88 1988-89 FY 88-89 FY 89-90 1989-90
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 0 0 0 1 ,170, 000 1 , 170,000
PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 0 40, 000 0 0 254, 056
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 250, 000 0 850, 000 850,000
OTHER REVENUE 0 10,000, 000 1 , 500, 000 8, 500, 000 8, 500,000
CDBG REIMBURSEMENT 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REVENUES $0 $10,290, 000 $1 , 500, 000 $10,520, 000 $10, 774, 056
ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL & BUDGET BUDGET
SUBJECT EXPENSE APPROP. ESTIMATED REQUEST APPROP.
CODE EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 1987-88 1988-89 FY 88-89 FY 89-90 1989-90
.30 PROFESSIONAL/LEGAL SERVICES 67,708 25,000 225,000 100, 000 36, 000
. 37 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 0 50, 000 2, 000 150, 000 150, 000
.38 DEWATERING 0 50, 000 3, 500 150, 000 150, 000
. 39 ADMINISTRATION - ENGINEERING 30,671 200,000 85, 000 275, 000 275, 000
.74 GRADING, DRAINAGE 336 300, 000 4,000 400, 000 400, 000
.84 GENERAL OPERATION & MAINT. 0 75,000 10, 500 25, 000 25, 000
.91 REGRADING P.V. DRIVE SOUTH 216,700 350, 000 0 650, 000 650, 000
. 92 CONTINGENCY/LITIGATION 0 0 0 0 50, 000
FUTURE BOND EXPENSE RESERVE 0 40,000 0 0 254, 056
REIMBURSE CITY ADVANCE 0 0 0 500, 000 500, 000
TOTAL-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $315,415 $1 ,090, 000 $330, 000 $2,250, 000 $2,490, 056
ENDING FUND BALANCE ( 315,415) 9, 200, 000 1 ,170, 000 8, 270, 000 8, 284, 000
-136-
I r r r I I I - OMNI MO - I NM - OM N N MN
O I O O N 111111 O QTY IMO RAC) PAS VIES IMMO OMNI IMMO OMNI IMMO IMMO UM
JUSTIFICATION SHEET
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - ABALONE COVE
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 825-830
EXPENSE CODE ; ITEM, DESCRIPTION, & JUSTIFICATION ; ESTIMATED COST
.30 ; PROFESSIONAL/LEGAL SERVICES - LEGAL SERVICES AS REQUIRED TO INTERPRET 36 ,000
THE SETTLEMENT, ADVISE THE PANEL, OR TO REVIEW ITEMS FOR LEGAL '
INTERPRETATION.
. 37 ; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION - INCLUDES STAFF TIME FOR ADMINISTRATION OF ; 150, 000
THE TECHNICAL PANEL, THE HORAN SETTLEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS, ETC.
. 38 ; DEWATERING - NEW WELLS AND ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE DEWATERING MEASURES ; 150, 000
INCLUDES INSTALLATION, EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
.39 ; ADMINISTRATION/ENGINEERING - TECHNICAL PANEL COSTS, OUTSIDE ; 275, 000
ENGINEERING, STAFF ENGINEERING AND INVESTIGATIONS RELATED TO SPECIFIC ;
PROJECTS AND ANY RELATED SUBCONSULTANTS OR INSPECTIONS.
.74 ; GRADING, DRAINAGE - LOT, ROOF AND ROAD DRAINAGE AS WELL AS ALTAMIRA ; 400,000
CANYON WORK AND OTHER SURFACE DRAINAGE PROJECTS.
.84 ; GENERAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE - CONTINUED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ; 25, 000
OF THE EXISTING DEWATERING SYSTEMS OR OTHER MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES.
.91 ; REGRADING P.V. DRIVE SOUTH - THE RECONSTRUCTION AND GRADING FOR ; 650, 000
PROPER DRAINAGE OF PALOS VERDES DRIVE SOUTH FROM WAYFARERS CHAPEL TO
NARCISSA DRIVE.
.92 ; CONTINGENCY - RESERVE FOR POSSIBLE LITIGATION. 50, 000
FUTURE BOND EXPENSE RESERVE - PAYMENT TO A RESERVE FUND FOR DEBT ; 254, 056
PAYMENT. ALL REQUIRED INCREMENT WILL BE PLACED IN A SEPARATE FUND
TO REPAY THE DEBT OF THE AGENCY.
REIMBURSE CITY ADVANCE - THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AGREED TO ; 500, 000
ADVANCE FUNDS TO THE AGENCY - ABALONE COVE WITH THE UNDERSTANDING ;
THAT THE ADVANCE WAS A SHORT TERM LOAN AND WAS TO BE REPAID, WITH
INTEREST, UPON RECEIPT OF THE COUNTY BOND FUNDS.
-137-
KORAN SETTLEMENT
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION- ABALONE COVE
1989-1990
BUDGET
1 . Roof Gutters
175 K
The structures adjacent to and within the active Abalone Cove
landslide are to be fitted with roof gutters if y
required and and
9
drainage systems to conduct the stormwater to the streets.
2 . PVDS Design
50 K
Palos Verdes Drive South ( PVDS) from Wayfarers Chapel on the west
to Narcissa on the east is being designed to establish P ositive
drainage.
2A. PVDS Construction
Construct drainage improvements and regrade Palos Verdes Drive South. 650 K
3 . Hydraulic Study
50 K
Study the Alta Mira Canyon watershed and identify the uanti t
points • g y
of stormwater at various
p s and evaluate the sufficiency of
the existing drainage structures including • pipes,can ons i es roads
and swales.
y
4 . Street Plans
Restricted to preparation of road rehabilitation lans for Narcissa,
'
Figtree or other roads that have been specifically damaged by the
landslide or are insufficient to handle stormwater runoff.
-till- 11•11 MIN NM MI MI MIN MI11 11111 =II
MI 111111 MINI1 INN 1111111 MIIII MI1 1111111 EMI
O - - O - E I s - - - - - w - - s
4A. Street Construction
Build the improvements as designed in 4. It i� is anticipated this
will be one of the last projects undertaken to allow for
installation of other improvements such as sewers and drainage lines.
5. Drain Design
20 K
Prepare detailed plans for an interceptor drain
upper Narcissa P drainage structure
along u
PP sa to direct the stormwater into Alta Mira
Canyon above the active slide.
5A. Drain Construction
250 K
Construct the pipe as designed in #5 above.
6. Alta Mira Canyon Plans
50 K
Based on the Hydraulic Study, #3 and the Alta Mira
M i r
a Canyon Study done January 1978, prepare plans to insure drainage which
protects the channel from erosion,
keeps the water in the channel and i s aesthetically
y pleasfng.
6A. Alta Mira Canyon Construction
Build the improvements as designed in
9 16 above.
7. Sanitary Sewer Study
50 K
Prepare a recommendation for the installation of f sanitary
sewers considering various methods such as gravity and grinder
pump and determine the maximum cost benefit based
of the landslide area .
on the limitations
7A. Sanitary Sewer Design
Prepare detailed construction plans based o
of #7.
on the study recommendation
-139-
7B. Sanitary Sewer Construction
Build the Sanitary Sewer System as designed Y g d in #7A.
8 . Toe Berm Study
100 K
Continued investigation by the Technical Panel and others to
ascertain the need for a toe berm.
8A . Toe Berm Design
If a toe berm is recommended , have detailed construction lans
prepared. p
8B. Toe Berm Construction
Construct the toe berm as designed in #8A, if it is found
beneficial .
-140-
M I IMMI IMMI IMMI 11.111 OM MI IMMI 111111 MO IMMI IIMMI M 1111111 I N
I= NMI NMI MINI MIN NMI NMI MI MIN INN IIMI =I 111111 1111110 MN NM II=1 NMI NMI
HORAN SETTLEMENT
ABALONE COVE PROJECT SCHEDULE
ACTiVITY
KEY
1. ROOF GUTTERS j
II Ea CONSTRUCTION
2. PVDS DESIGN
is DESIGN
2A. PVDS CONST..
ri STUDY
3. HYDRAULIC STUDY Wit OPTIONAL
4. STREET PLANS
4A. STREET CONST. /4
5. DRAIN DESIGN
5A. DRAIN CONST.
6. ALTA MIRA PLANS
6A. ALTA MIRA CONST.
7. SAN. SEWER STUDY
7A. SAN. SEWER DESIGN
7B. SAN. SEWER CONST. v
1
8. TOE BERM STUDY .. ,.. , L _. . . _ - _ agair
SA. TOE BERM DESIGN
(IF REQUIRED) N„""
8B. TOEBERMCONST. atitate
(IF REQUIRED) 1989 1950 1991 1992
-141--