CC MINS 19950705M I N U T E S
RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 5, 1995
The meeting of the Rancho Palos Verdes City Council was called to
order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Lee Byrd at the Hesse Park Community
Center, 29301 Hawthorne Boulevard. Following the Pledge of
Allegiance to the flag, roll call was answered as follows:
PRESENT: LYON, McTAGGART, BROOKS AND MAYOR BYRD
ABSENT: NONE
Also present were City Manager Paul Bussey, Assistant City Manager
Pamela Antil, Director of Planning, Building & Code Enforcement
Bret Bernard, Public Works Director Trent Pulliam, Associate
Planner Terry Silverman, Associate Planner Donna Jerex, City
Attorney Carol Lynch, and City Clerk Jo Purcell.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilwoman Lyon moved, seconded by Councilman McTaggart to
approve the agenda. Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
At the request of Councilwoman Brooks the General Municipal
Election resolutions was moved to Regular Business for discussion.
Councilwoman Brooks moved, seconded by Councilwoman Lyon to
approve the Consent Calendar as follows:
WAIVER OF FULL READING
Adopted a motion to waive reading in full of all ordinances adopted
at this meeting with consent to the waiver of reading deemed to be
given by all councilmembers after the reading of the title.
RESOLUTION NO. 95 -66 - REGISTER OF DEMANDS (602)
ADOPTED RESOL. NO. 95 -66 ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AND
SPECIFYING FUNDS FROM WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE PAID.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY - KENNETH ACKERT (301 X 303)
Rejected the claim and directed the City Clerk to notify the
claimant.
REGIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT
(1101 X 1206)
Authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Regional Law
enforcement Services Agreement on behalf on the City.
RESOL. NOS. 95 -67, 95 -68
APPEAL OF COASTAL PERMIT NO. 124 AND
VARIANCE NO. 378 (1203 X 1804)
Adopted (1) RESOLUTION NO, 95 -67 DENYING THE APPEAL AND VACATING
THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF COASTAL PERMIT NO. 124
ASSOCIATED WITH VARIANCE NO. 378, THEREBY REQUIRING THE EXISTING
EIGHTY -EIGHT (88) INCH HIGH FOUNTAIN LOCATED WITHIN THE FIFTY (50)
FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA TO BE REMOVED OR REDUCED TO A MAXIMUM
OF FORTY -TWO (42) INCHES IN HEIGHT; AND, TAKING NO ACTION WITH
RESPECT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION WITH REGARD TO THE
INSTALLATION OF THE AFTER - THE -FACT LIGHTING SEAWARD OF THE BUILDING
SETBACK LINE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A BAR AND BARBECUE AREA WITHIN
SIDE YARD SETBACK AREA. (2) Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 95 -68 DENYING
THE APPEAL AND OVERTURNING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF
VARIANCE NO. 378, THEREBY REQUIRING THE EXISTING EIGHTY - EIGHT (88)
INCH HIGH FOUNTAIN LOCATED WITHIN THE FIFTY (50) FOOT FRONT YARD
SETBACK AREA TO BE REMOVED OR REDUCED TO A MAXIMUM OF FORTY -TWO
(42) INCHES IN HEIGHT; AND, TAKING NO ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION WITH REGARD TO THE INSTALLATION OF
THE AFTER - THE -FACT LIGHTING SEAWARD OF THE BUILDING SETBACK LINE
AND CONSTRUCTION OF A BAR AND BARBECUE AREA WITHIN THE SIDE YARD
SETBACK AREA.
The motion to approve the Consent Calendar carried on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: LYON, McTAGGART, BROOKS AND MAYOR BYRD
NOES: NONE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT INITIATION REQUEST
LOCATION: 6108 PALOS VERDES DR. Soo (701 X 1203)
Associate Planner Donna Jerex presented the staff report of July 5,
1995 and the recommendation to allow the applicant to proceed with
a General Plan Amendment Initiation Request to change the land use
designation from Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) to
Commercial Office.
Lois Larue, 3136 Barkentine, said her home is directly above the
site.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 5, 1995
PAGE 2
Council directed their discussion to whether there was sufficient
time to complete the proposed code amendments prior to the
processing of this amendment particularly as it related to the
maximum height allowed for commercial sites; and, what was the
nonconforming feature presently at that location.
Property owner Robert Haase, 20 Seacove Drive, said he did not want
to encourage a lot of activity at this site because he lives nearby
himself; that his intention was to make it compatible with the
neighborhood by downplaying the commercial use; and, that he had no
intention of going to the maximum height of 35 ft. and therefore
had no objection to a height restriction.
Councilman McTaggart moved, seconded by Councilwoman Lyon to direct
staff to initiate a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to
review this property, as well as the two adjacent properties, and
to bring the land use into conformance with the current uses.
Motion carried.
NOTIFICATION OF RESTRICTED PARKING IN CONNECTION
WITH INSTALLATION OF HANDICAPPED RAMPS (601 X 1204)
Public Works Director Pulliam presented the staff report of July 5,
1995 and explained in detail the current policy and procedures
concerning notification to residents when the City is making
street .improvements such as slurry seal or overlay. In addition,
he explained the current program of constructing handicapped
sidewalk ramps in compliance with the American with Disabilities
Act. Continuing, he explained the coordination between the overlay
and the ramp installation and the notification procedure followed
to inform residents of impending construction activity. Because of
complaints received about the inconvenience experienced as a result
of work not being completed as originally scheduled, Director
Pulliam then explained the revised procedure for initial and
subsequent notifications of parking restrictions for current and
future street improvement programs.
Along with the aforementioned programs, he then explained the
construction of handicap ramps at all intersections where sidewalk
improvements exist. Although there was a January 1, 1995 deadline,
he explained that because of limited funds, the City, along with
many other cities, chose to install the ramps over a period of
several years and coordinate with other street improvement projects
in various areas of the City.
Council then discussed the provisions of this Federal mandate which
cost approximately $700 to $800 per curb cut; the fact that
noncompliance would result in harsh penalties; and, that probably
the only way to get some relief from these requirements would be
through a legislative change. Beyond that, however, concern was
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 51 1995
PAGE 3
expressed about the safety of these ramps in light of the sloping
terrain in many parts of the City. Apropos that concern, Council
requested that the City Attorney prepare a discussion addressing
the issue of liability in the event of accidents occurring in such
areas. To get a change in this legislation, however, it was the
consensus that a letter be sent to our U. S. senators and
congressional representatives requesting that cities be given more
flexibility in determining where these ramps should be installed.
RESOL. NOS. 95 -69, 70 & 71 -
NOVEMBER 71 1995 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
(301 X 501'
City Clerk Purcell presented the staff memorandum of July 5 and the
recommendation that Council adopt the following proposed
resolutions: (1) CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1995,
FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS
OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW
CITIES; (2) REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO
THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 7, 1955; AND, ( 3) ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR
ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO
THE VOTERS AT ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1995.
Council inquiries were directed at the rationale for consolidating
with the County in light of concern about voter fraud and,
moreover, the cost of complying with Federal and state language
mandates It was the consensus that a letter be sent . to the County
Board of Supervisors requesting that they be mindful of keeping
election costs down.
The following resolutions were presented by title and adopted on
motion of Mayor Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lyon: (1) RESOL.
NO. 95 -69 CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1995, FOR THE
ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES; ( 2 )
RESOL. NO. 95 -70 REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF- LOS ANGELES TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO
THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 7, 1955; AND, (3) RESOL. NO, 95 -71 ADOPTING REGULATIONS
FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES
STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT THE ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1995. Motion carried.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS: Harold Hermann, 8 La Vista Verde, said he had
filed a claim against the City and would like to speak to the
matter. Because this claim had already been referred to the City's
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 5, 1995
PAGE 4
claims administrator Carl Warren & Co. and was scheduled for the
July 18 City Council agenda, it was the consensus not to enter into
a discussion on the matter. Mr. Hermann said he would return on
July 18 to discuss his claim.
Kathy Snell, Vanderlip Lane, reported that on weekends some
bicyclists ride as many as five abreast on PV Dr. South and
requested that the City enforce the single file rule. She
requested that the Redevelopment Agency meetings start earlier;
questioned the amount of staff time spent on the issue of
horsekeeping; suggested that the gate at Abalone Cove Beach Park be
closed at night; and, questioned the statement that the slide had
been stopped.
We regard to the concern bicycle safety, Council displayed the new
sign soon to be posted on Palos Verdes Drive East discouraging that
road as a bicycle route. It was pointed out that the gate at
Abalone Cove Beach is indeed closed nightly and that the exit gate
has a directional traffic device which prevent cars from driving in
and out of the exit. The Redevelopment Agency meetings, it was
pointed out, are held after the 8:30 P.M. Council recess.
ADJOURNMENT: At 7:54 P.M. the meeting adjourned on motion of
Councilman McTaggart.
oR
rmm 'vom.
a:7595CCM JUL 5 95 CC MINS.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 5, 19 9 5
PAGE 5