Loading...
CC RES 1997-028RESOLUTION NO. 97-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES APPROVING ADDENDUM NO.2 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 32 WITH RESPECT TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 46651 - AMENDMENT NO. 29 FOR THE 63 -LOT "SEABREEZE" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CREST ROAD AND HIGHRIDGE ROAD WHEREAS, on October 15, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution No. 91 -73 certifying Environmental Impact Report No. 32, in connection with Tentative Tract Map No. 46651, Conditional Use Permit No. 151 and Grading Permit No. 1389 for a 63 -lot Residential Planned Development on a 59 -acre vacant parcel located at the southwest corner of Crest Road and Highridge Road; and, WHEREAS, on October 1, 1996, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes adopted Resolution No. 96 -88, approving the Addendum No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 32, in connection with Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 - Amendment No. 1 and Conditional Use Permit No. 151 - Revision "A ", in order to: A) remove a requirement to provide an underground equestrian trail tunnel easement on the property; B) modify a condition of approval to allow a portion of the cost of providing a traffic signal on Crest Road to be paid for by the developer of an adjacent tract in the City of Rolling Hills Estates; C) remove conditions of approval related to an off -site debris basin which is no longer associated with the project; and D) make other minor technical changes to the conditions of approval; and, WHEREAS, on March 18, 1997, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and adopted P.C. Resolution No. 97 -14 recommending City Council approval of Addendum No. 2 to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), in conjunction with the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 - Amendment No. 2, Conditional Use Permit No. 151- Revision "B" and Grading Permit No. 1389 - Revision "A", in order to: A) allow the export of 80,000 cubic yards of earth from the site; B) modify the timing requirements for two conditions of approval; and, C) remove a condition of approval related to monitoring wells on the site, which were determined to be no longer necessary by the City's geotechnical consultant; and, WHEREAS, prior to taking action on the proposed amendments and revisions to the approved single family residential project, the City Council considered the information and findings contained in Addendum No. 2 to the EIR, and determined that the document was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and local guidelines, with respect thereto; and, WHEREAS, on April 15, 1997, after notice issued pursuant to the requirements of the Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, the City Council held a public hearing on the project, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That the proposed change to the approved project, which will allow the export of up to 80,000 cubic yards of earth as part of the grading for project development, will occur within the limits of grading for the project that were previously approved. Technical studies were prepared to identify potential air quality, noise and transportation system impacts of the proposed export. These technical studies, on file in the Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, did not identify any significant impacts associated with the proposed project. Further, a biological analysis was prepared for the proposed project to identify biological impacts, if any, not previously identified in Final EIR No. 32, as a result of the protected status of the California gnatcatcher. This biological analysis, on file in the Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, did not identify impacts to biological resources (in particular, impacts to coastal sage scrub) that were not previously identified in Final EIR No. 32. Therefore, pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, approval of Addendum No. 2 to the previously - certified EIR, rather than the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, is appropriate for the consideration of the proposed revisions to the Seabreeze project, based on the following findings: 1. That subsequent changes proposed to the project do not require important revisions to the previous EIR, since there are no new significant environmental impacts that have been identified, which were not considered in the previous EIR. 2. That substantial changes to the project would not occur with respect to the circumstances under which project is undertaken, which would require important revisions to the previous EIR, since there are no new significant environmental impacts that were not considered in the previous EIR. 3. That there is no new information of substantial importance to the project which indicates that the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed previously in the EIR; that significant effects previously examined will not be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; that no mitigation measures or alternatives, previously found not to be feasible, would now in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or that no mitigation measures or alternatives which were not previously considered in the EIR, would now substantially lessen one or more significant effects of the environment. Section 2: In addition to the revisions to the adopted mitigation monitoring program that relate to the proposed export of up to 80,000 cubic yards of earth, the adopted mitigation monitoring program for EIR No. 32 has been amended to: A) delete mitigation measures that were rendered obsolete with the approval of project revisions adopted by the City Council as part of Resolution No. 96 -89 and Resolution No. 96 -90 (for which Addendum No. 1 to the EIR was prepared); and B) minor revisions to the text or timing of several of the mitigation measures in order to clarify the intent of the mitigation measure and /or define appropriate timing for implementation of the mitigation measure. The proposed clarifications and /or modifications will not alter the effectiveness of the mitigation measures, and will act, instead, to ensure that the Resolution No. 97 -28 Page 2 of 5 project is better monitored and the impacts are fully mitigated. Therefore, pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, approval of draft Addendum No. 2 to the previously- certified EIR is appropriate for the consideration of the proposed revisions to the Seabreeze project. Section 3: In approving Addendum No. 2 to EIR No. 32, the City Council has independently reviewed and considered the Addendum No..2 document, attached hereto and made a part thereof, as Exhibit "A" and the revised Mitigation Monitoring Program, attached hereto by reference and made a part thereof, as Exhibit "B ". Section 4: That Addendum No. 2 to EIR No. 32 identifies no new potential significant adverse environmental impacts to the areas listed below, beyond those already identified in the Final EIR No. 32, as a result of the export of up to 80,000 cubic yards of earth: 1. Landform, Geology and Soil 2. Hydrology and Drainage 3. Biological Resources 4. Cultural and Scientific Resources 5. Aesthetics 6. Land Use and Relevant Planning 7. Circulation and Traffic 8. Air Resources 9. Noise 10. Public Services and Utilities 11. Population, Employment and Housing 12. Fiscal Impacts Section 5: That implementation of the revised project to allow export of up to 80,000 cubic yards of earth would not require additional mitigation measures to mitigate significant adverse environmental impacts not identified in previously - certified EIR No. 32. However, as discussed above in Section 2, minor modifications have been made to the mitigation monitoring program to address the currently - proposed project and to clarify the intent/timing for some of the mitigation measures. These proposed clarifications and /or modifications will not alter the effectiveness of the conditions of approval or the mitigation measures, and will act, instead, to ensure that the project implementation is better monitored and the impacts are mitigated to the extent possible. Section 6: That, while the implementation of the mitigation measures as discussed in Final EIR No. 32, as well as the modified mitigation monitoring program based on the addenda to the Final EIR, will reduce potential environmental impacts of the project, it is not entirely possible to eliminate project impacts identified in Statement of Overriding Considerations, including impacts to air quality, biological resources and visual/ aesthetics, as provided in Final EIR No. 32, and hereby incorporated by reference. Section 7: All findings, attachments and Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Resolution Nos. 91 -73 and 96 -88, as adopted by the City Council on October 15, 1991 and October 1, 1996, respectively, are hereby incorporated by reference. Resolution No. 97 -28 Page 3of5 Section 8: For the foregoing reasons and based on the information contained in the staff report, minutes, evidence presented at the public hearings and other records of the proceedings, the City Council of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes hereby approves of Addendum No. 2 to Final EIR No. 32, based on the determination that the document was completed in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and State and local guidelines with respect thereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of April 1997. ATTEST: CLERK ,4'1"ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )ss CITY OR RANCHO PALOS VERDES ) I, Jo Purcell, City Clerk for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 97 -28 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting held on April 15, 1997. Jo Pur II, City Clerk City of ancho Palos Verdes Resolution No. 97 -28 Page 4 of 5 Resolution No. 97 -28 Exhibit "A" ADDENDUM NO.2 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 32 The City Council has reviewed the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 - Amendment No. 2, in conjunction with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as well as State and Local CEQA Guidelines, and finds as follows: The modifications to the conditions of approval and mitigation monitoring program regarding balancing earth movement on -site would not constitute a significant adverse environmental impact traffic movement and circulation patterns, ambient air quality and existing noise levels in the vicinity of the project, as documented in the following studies, which are attached to this C.C. Resolution by reference: "Kajima Project Traffic Study" prepared by WPA Traffic Engineering dated February 27, 1997. "Air Quality Assessment for Dirt hauling Operations Associated with Grading for TT No. 46651 " prepared by Mestre Greve Associates dated February 3, 1997. "Noise Assessment for Maul Route Noise Associated with TT No. 46651 Grading" prepared by Mestre Greve Associates dated February 3, 1997. That modification to the mitigation monitoring program related to biological resources would not constitute additional significant adverse impacts not identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations previously adopted by the City Council, as documented in the following study, which is attached to this C.C. Resolution by reference: "California Gnatcatcher Report - TT No. 46651 " prepared by Michael Brandman Associates dated February 12, 1997. The amendments to the Conditions of Approval and the Mitigation Monitoring Program would not result in any new or increased impacts to the environment, since these changes will not alter the effectiveness of the conditions of approval and mitigation measures, and will act, instead, to ensure that the impacts of the project are mitigated to the extent feasible. N:\GROUP\PLANNING\RESOS\CC\AEIR3.KAJ Resolution No. 97 -28 Page 5of5 Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING GRADING/GEOLOGY 1.1 All grading, testing and earthwork will be performed in Prior the the Issuance of During Grading Department of Planning, accordance with the general grading and earthwork Grading Permit; Site Building and Code specifications of the geotechnical report by Leighton and Inspection Enforcement Associates, unless specifically revised by subsequent updates or if required by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. 1.2 Grading operations shall be under the general supervision Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, of a registered geologist, engineering geologist, or soils Building and Code engineer (Uniform Building Code) to observe earthwork Enforcment procedure and test fill for conformance to design specifications. 1.3 A minimum of two additional borings are recommended Submittal of Data from During Grading; Prior to the Department of Planning, south of lots 3 to 6 during grading and prior to Borings Issuance of Building Building and Code construction to verify the nonexistence of a deep- seated Permits Enforcment potential failure plane. Because drill rigs can cause great land disturbance, the final borings should be achieved hile the site has been cleared of vegetation and other machinery is disrupting the site. If the existence of a slide plane is confirmed, or lower strength bedrock is encountered, the developer shall provide a means to stabilize the slope, subject to the approval of the City. This, along with the revegetation of all created slopes and the provision of drainage facilities, will aid in stabilizing the project site. 1.4 Frequent in- grading inspections should be conducted Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, during site development. These inspections are Building and Code necessary to substantiate previous geologic findings and Enforcement to discover unforeseen conditions that may be exposed during grading. Any unanticipated adverse conditions encountered should be evaluated by the project engineering geologist and the soils engineer, and the appropriate recommendations made and followed. AIR QUALITY 2.1 Fugitive dust emissions will be controlled with regular Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, watering or other airborne dust reducing measures in Building and Code compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 and as directed by Enforcement the City. EXHIBIT "B" Resol. No. 97 -28 Page Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS IMITIGATION REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 2.2 All construction equipment must be maintained and kept Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, tuned to reduce emissions from heavy equipment. Building and Code Enforcement 2.3 All grading activities will cease during periods of winds Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, greater than 25 miles per hour. Building and Code Enforcement 2.4 The project will maintain convenient access to transit Verification of Prior to the Approval of Department of Planning, stops and provide for easy pedestrian access. Maintenance of Access Final Tract Map Building and Code Enforcement 2.5 Low emission mobile construction equipment shall be Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, used, where feasible. Building and Code Enforcement HYDROLOGY 3.1 An erosion and sediment - transport control plan Approved Erosion and Prior to the Issuance of Department of Public Works incorporating standard erosion control practices shall be Sediment - Transport Grading Permit implemented. Standard erosion control practices include: Control Plan retaining sediments within project sites during construction periods by the use of catch basing; using interceptor ditches and benches to prevent gullying of slopes; and preparing and implementing erosion control plans in accordance with the appropriate regulatory agencies. 3.2 The project proponent shall conduct a hydrology study to Approved Hydrology Prior to the Issuance of Department of Public Works determine adverse impacts of the subject development Study Grading Permit upon natural drainage on the subject property and upon properties located downslope from the subject development and the improvements necessary to mitigate those impacts. 3.3 If the City determines that an on -site detention basin is Grad ing /Drainage Plan Prior to the Issuance of Department of Public Works needed, the project proponent shall construct it. Check Grading Permit 3A ubdrains shall be placed in all keyways and at 20- oot rading /Drainage Plan Prior to the Issuance of Department o Public Works vertical intervals where compacted fill is placed over Check Grading Permit natural slope areas. 3.5 Material treatment within the detention basin will include Drainage /Landscape Prior to the Issuance of Department of Public Works low height landscaping and shall be designed to prohibit Plan Check Grading Permit inappropriate recreational use. EXHIBIT "B" Resol. No. 97— Page Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 3.6 The following water conservation procedures shall be Landscape Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, incorporated into the project elements where feasible to Grading Permit Building and Code reduce surface runoff: landscape with low -water using Enforcement plants; install efficient irrigation systems that minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize the water that will reach the plant roots, such as drip irrigation, soil moisture sensors; and automatic irrigation irrigation systems. 3.7 Velocity reducers and channel stabilizers will be installed Drainage Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Public Works to eliminate erosion potential in the secondary drainage Grading Permit course below Crest Road to the head of McCarrell Canyon. Protection works at this outlet will be improved and corrected to prevent erosion beneath the outlet apron. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE 4.1 Specimen trees shall be provided in the project landscape Landscape Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, plan. Native trees shall be included in the plan. Grading Permit Building and Code Enforcement 4.2 Lights from the proposed project should not obtrude into Approved C &R's Prior to the Approval of Department of Planning, McCarrell Canyon. Restrictions on landscape backyard Final Tract Map Building and Code lighting adjacent to the wash and arroyo can minimize Enforcement their effect on wildlife. Lighting shall be low -level and shall avoid direct lighting of the canyon, and shall conform with City standards. 4.3 A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit and Proper Permit Acquisition Prior to the Issuance of USFWS; CDFG; Departmen a California Department of Fish and Game 1603 Grading Permit of Planning, Building and Streambed Alteration Agreement shall be obtained by the Code Enforcement project proponent, if required. 4.4 One or more escape routes shall be established during Grading Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, grading and construction to allow wildlife to reach adjaceni Grading Permit Building and Code undisturbed areas. Enforcement 4.5 A conceptual mitigation plan shall be created to replace Approved Mitigation Plan Approved Mitigation Plan USFWS; Department of impacted coastal sage scrub onsite. Impacted coastal Planning, Building and Code sage scrub will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1. Following Enforcement grading, a final tally of coastal sage scrub that was removed will be calculated. The plan will include planting, maintenance, and monitoring details. EXHIBIT "B " Resol. No. 97- Page Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 4.6 N portions �� the project site outside the proposed Site inspection rior to Commencement o epartment of Planning, grading limits shall be avoided during construction. Bright Grading Building and Code orange plastic fencing, stakes, flags or other markers shall Enforcement be used to delimit the areas that are to be avoided by construction activities. 4.7 A qualified biologist (monitor) shall be onsite during all ite Inspection During Grading U FWS; DF ; Departmen clearing and grubbing activities on TT 46651 to insure that of Planning, Building and no take of the California gnatcatcher occurs. The Code Enforcement monitor(s) shall have the authority to stop all activities until appropriate corrective measures have been completed, if necessary. The monitor(s) shall also be required to report violations immediately to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game. 4.8 No dumping of trash or storage of construction materials Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, shall occur within the areas proposed as undeveloped on Building and Code the project site. Enforcement 4.9 All personnel present on the site during all construction Verification of Instruction Prior to Commencement of Department of Planning, activities shall receive instruction regarding the presence Grading Building and Code of the threatened California gnatcatcher. Enforcement 4.10 If the Pacific pocket mouse are discovered anywhere on Competed studies, as Prior to Issuance of rading U FWS; Department of the peninsula, the developer shall consult with the United required Permit Planning, Building and Code States Fish and Wildlife Service on which studies are Enforcement required under the federal Endangered Species Act and shall conduct those studies. NOISE 5.1 Residential development must be in compliance with Title Building Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of epartment of Planning, 24 of the State of California Administrative Code (noise Building Permits Building and Code insulation standards). Enforcement 5.2 Construction activity will be limited to the hours of 7:00 Site Inspection During Grading/ During Department of Planning, a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No Construction Building and Code construction activities shall be allowed on Sundays or Enforcement holidays. After consultation with the developer and residents in the surrounding neighborhoods, the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement may further limit the hours of construction and grading, as necesary. EXHIBIT "B" Resol. No. 97 -28 Page 4 Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO. MITIGATI N MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 5.3 Construction equipment must employ sound restriction Site Inspection During Grading /During Department of Planning, devices to reduce noise levels, if necessary. Construction Building and Code Enforcement 5.4 The City will review all plot plans to determine the nature Landscape Plan heck; Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, and extent of sound attenuation elements (e.g., Building Plan Check Grading Permit; Prior to Building and Code landscaping berms and /or walls) provided by the Issuance of Building Enforcement developer that may be necessary to buffer adjacent Permits noise - sensitive uses from noise - generating land uses. 5.5 Haul trucks shall be prohibited from queuing at the project Site Inspection During Grading Department of Planning, site prior to 7:00 a.m. After consultation with the Building and Code developer and residents in the surrounding Enforcement neighborhoods, the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement may further limit the hours of queuing, as necessary. LIGHT AND GLARE 6.1 All exterior lighting, either decorative or security, shall be Approved C &R's; Prior to Approval of Final Department of Planning, directed downward to shield it from adjacent property and Building Plan Check Tract Map; Prior to the Building and Code to prevent glare to motorists and shall conform to City Issuance of Building Enforcement standards. Permits 6.2 Landscape buffers should be used to screen adjacent and Landscape Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, onsite uses from automobile and spillover lighting. Grading Permit Building and Code Enforcement 6.3 No night lighting should be allowed on the undisturbed Approved CC &R's; Prior to the Approval of Department of Planning, areas of the site in order to avoid potential impacts to Building Plan Check Final Tract Map; Prior to the Building and Code wildlife. Issuance of Building Enforcement Permits 6.4 Landscaping in and adjacent to the detention basin to Landscape Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, minimize reflection when ponded water is present shall be Grading Permit Building and Code incorporated. Enforcement 6.5 Backyard lighting adjacent to the wash shall be restricted Building Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, in conformance with the Development Code standards in Building Permits Buiding and Code order to minimize their effect on wildlife. Enforcement LAND USE AND ZONING 7.1 Development of the property for residential use shall be in rading Plan heck; Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, accordance with the development standards of the Final Tract Map Check; Grading Permit; Prior to the Building and Code Residential Planned Development (RPD) as established Building Plan Check Approval of Final Tract Map Enforcement through the conditions of approval for the Conditional Use Prior to the Issuance of Permit (CUP) and grading permit. Building Permits EXHIBIT "B" Resol. No. 97 -28 Page Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION MEASURE MONIT RIN AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 7.2 All landscaping schemes shall be compatible and Landscape Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, harmonious with the characteristics of the natural setting, Grading Permit Building and Code and incorporate drought - tolerant species as required by Enforcement the City. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 8.1 The intersection approaches along Highridge Road should Approved Street Prior to the Approval of Department of Public Works be constructed to allow for two lanes, one for left turns Improvement Plans Final Tract Map only. 8.2 The proposed haul route(s) for soil export will be reviewed Approved Truck Route Prior to the Issuance of Department of Public Works by the City. Trucks exporting fill from the project site shall Plan Grading Permit be prohibited from utilizing Crenshaw Boulevard, due to it steep slope. FIRE PROTECTION 9.1 Adequate offsite public and onsite private fire hydrants will Approved Fire Protection Prior to the Approval of LA FD; Department of be required. The precise number and location of the fire Plans Final Tract Map Planning, Building and Code hydrants will be determined after the fire department has Enforcement had an opportunity to review the plot plan. 9.2 Fire flows of up to 1,250 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure Approved Fire Protection Prior to the Approval of LA FD; Department of will be required. Plans Final Tract Map Planning, Building and Code Enforcment 9.3 The applicant must submit plot plans that show the Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of LA FD; Department of access road and the turning area for fire department Final Tract Map Planning, Building and Code approval. Enforcement 9.4 Dead - ending streets shall terminate in a cul -de -sac or Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of LA FD; Department of other approved turning area (fire lanes are not required for Final Tract Map Planning, Building and Code the project). Enforcement 9.5 Access for fire department apparatus and personnel to Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of LA F ; Department of and into all structures shall be required. All structures will Final Tract Map Planning, Building and Code comply with all local fire codes. Enforcement POLICE R E TI N 10. 1 A tamper - resistant burglar alarm system should be Building Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, incorporated into the design of the residential units, if Building Permits Building and Code - I feasible. Enforcement EXHIBIT "B" Resol. No. 97 -28 Page 6 Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 10.2 All main entryways to the residential units should be Building Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, visible from the street and well illuminated, if feasible. Building Permits Building and Code Enforcement 10.3 All main entry doors should be of solid core construction Building Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, and contain "peep viewers" and dead -bolt locks, if Building Permits Building and Code feasible. Enforcement PARKS AND TRAILS 11.1 The developer shall dedicate and improve Kajima Trail for Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of Department of Planning, pedestrian purposes according to the standards in the Final Tract Map Building and Code Conceptual Trails Plan. The Kajima Trail shall be located Enforcement on the east side of the canyon rather than on the bottom wherever possible to reduce habitat disturbance. 11.2 The developer shall improve Crooked Patch Trail to Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of Department of Planning, Conceptual Trails Plan standards and realign the trail Final Tract Map Building and Code closer to its official dedicated easement. Enforcement 11.3 The developer shall improve the Crest Ranch Trail in its Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of Department of Planning, existing location to allow pedestrian use, unless an Final Tract Map Building and Code alternative equestrian trail route is provided. Enforcement 11.4 The developer shall dedicate and improve a Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of Department of Planning, pedestrian /equestrian trail easement parallel to the Final Tract Map Building and Code Crooked Patch Trail. Enforcement 11.5 'To create a link between the trails in Rolling Hills Estates Final Tract Map Check Prior to the Approval of Department of Planning, and the Crooked Patch Trail, the developer shall dedicate Final Tract Map Building and Code and improve a pedestrian /equestrian trail between the two Enforcement trails along the east edge of the property adjacent to Highridge Road. UTILITIES 12.1 The project will be required to meet the energy Building Plan Check Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, conservation standards adoped by the California Energy Building Permits Building and Code Commission (Title 24). Enforcement EXHIBIT "B" Resol. No. 97 -28 Page 7 Tentative Tract Map No. 46651 Mitigation Monitoring Program MIT NO MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING AND MONITORING PARTY RESPONSIBLE STATUS REPORTING ACTION MILESTONE FOR MONITORING 12.2 To conserve water, efficient landscape irrigation systems Landscape Plan Check Prior to Issuance of Building Department of Planning, will be installed that minimize runoff and evaporation and Permits Building and Code minimize water that will reach the plant roots. Mulch will Enforcement be used extensively in landscaped areas. Drip irrigation soil moisture sensors and automatic irrigation systems are a few methods of increasing irrigation efficiency. AESTHETIC NIEWSHED 13.1 The ridgeline height of all structures shall be limited as Grading Plan heck; Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, required by the City to establish view corridors over the Final Tract Map Check Grading Permit; Prior to the Building and Code site from Crest Road and homes on Highridge Road. Approval of Final Tract Map Enforcement CULTURAL RESOURCES 14.1 The project archaeologist shall submit a protocol to the Approved Protocol; Prior to the Issuance of Department of Planning, City for monitoring and for the discovery of archaeological Submittal of Report Grading Permits; Site Building and Code resources. A qualified archaeologist shall be present Documenting Findings Inspection Enforcement during grading activities, as required, to evaluate cultural resources on the site. If archaeological resources are found, all work in the affected area shall be temporarily suspended and the resources shall be removed and preserved. All "finds" shall be immediately reported to the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement. All archaeological finds shall be first offered to the City for preservation. At the completion of grading, the project archaeologist shall submit a report detailing findings, if any. EXHIBIT ".B" Resol. No. 97 -28 Page 8