Loading...
CC RES 2001-062 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE 2001 CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089. WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted t he 1999 Congestion Management Program in December 1999; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP Local Implementation Report by September 1, 2001; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 21, 2001, at which time all interested parties were allowed to attend and give testimony. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That the City of Rancho Palos Verdes ("City") has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1999 CMP: A. By June 15 of odd numbered years, the City has conducted and transmitted to the MTA, traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter. B. The City has locally adopted, and continues to implement, a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter. C. The City has locally adopted, and continues to implement, a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter. D. The City has locally adopted the 2001 Local Implementation Report (LIR) attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan. Section 2: That the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County MTA. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of August 2001. r _ May ATTEST: a4 f •ITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES ) I, Jo Purcell, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, do hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 2001-62 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting held on August 21, 2001. 9 ()I) City Clerk Resolution No. 2001-62 Page 2 of 2 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared: 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 Contact: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Associate Planner Phone Number: (310) 544 -5228 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY 11- Mar -13 2001 DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS SUMMARY 1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal [from Section I] (957) Exempted Dwelling Units 0 Exempted Non - residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 0 2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims [from Section II] 1,960 Land Use Strategy Claims 0 Capital Improvement Claims 1 Transit Claims 1 TDM Claims 0 Total Strategies Claimed 2 Subtotal Current Credit (Goal) 1,003 3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (2000) Local Implementation Report 9,068 Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance: 10,071 Section I, Page 1 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared: 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT 11- Mar -13 PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Dwelling Units Debit Value /DU Debits Single Family Residential 16.00 x 6.80 = 109 Multi - Family Residential 0.00 x 4.76 = 0 Group Quarters 0.00 x 1.98 = 0 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Debit Value /1000SF Debits Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 38.16 x 22.23 = 848 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 = 0 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 x 66.99 = 0 NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Debit Value /1000SF Debits Lodging 0.00 x 7.21 = 0 Industrial 0.00 x 6.08 = 0 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 16.16 = 0 Office (50,000- 299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 = 0 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 = 0 Medical 0.00 x 16.90 = 0 Government 0.00 x 20.95 = 0 Institutional /Educational 0.00 x 7.68 = 0 University 0.00 x 1.66 = 0 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Daily Trips 0 Debit Value /Trip Debits ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0 Subtotal New Development Activity = 957 Adjustments (Optional) - Complete Part 2 0 = 0 Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points) = (957) Section I, Page 2 City of Rancho Palos Verdes Date Prepared: 11- Mar -13 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued) Enter information where it says "Enter." If not applicable, enter "0" so it will total. PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwelling Units Adjustment Value /DU Subtotal Single Family Residential 0.00 x 6.80 = 0 Multi- Family Residential 0.00 x 4.76 = 0 Group Quarters 0.00 x 1.98 = 0 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Adjustment Value /1000SF Subtotal Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 22.23 = 0 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 = 0 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 x 66.99 = 0 NON- RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Adjustment Value /1000SF Subtotal Lodging 0.00 x 7.21 = 0 Industrial 0.00 x 6.08 = 0 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 16.16 = 0 Office (50,000- 299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 = 0 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 = 0 Medical 0.00 x 16.90 = 0 Government 0.00 x 20.95 = 0 Institutional /Educational 0.00 x 7.68 = 0 University 0.00 x 1.66 = 0 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Description (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Daily Trips 0 Adjustment Value /Trip Subtotal ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0 ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0 Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 0 Section I, Page 3 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 Date Prepared: 11- Mar -13 SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued) PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) LowNery Low Income Housing High Density Residential near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments near Rail Stations Development Agreements entered into Prior to July 10, 1989 Reconstruction of Buildings damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest Reconstruction of Buildings damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake Total Dwelling Units Total Non - residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dwelling Units Dwelling Units 1000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 1000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 1000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 1000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units Exempted Development Definitions: 1 LowNery Low income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: Low - Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. Very Low - Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family 2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989. 5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non - residential structure which is damaged or destroyed, to the extent of not less than 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity. 6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval /disapproval authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LIR. Section I, Page 4 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 SECTION II.a - LAND USE CREDIT CLAIMS Date Prepared: #### Total Land Use Projects: o Total Land Use Credits (Points): #VALUE! 1 #VALUE! 2 Enter 3 0 5.Scope Enter 6.Units 0 4 Enter 7. Address: Enter 8. Center: Enter 9. Boundaries: Enter 10. Mixed Use: Enter 11. Site Area: Enter Square Feet 12. Net Site Acres: #VALUE! ACRES 13. Res. Dens.: #VALUE! DUs /Acre 14. Non -Res Density (FAR): 0.0 FAR 15. Other Info: Enter 16 0.00 17 #VALUE! 18 Enter 19 Enter 20 Enter 21 Enter 22 Enter 23 Enter 24 #VALUE! Section II.a, Page 5 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 SECTION II.a - LAND USE CREDIT CLAIMS Date Prepared: Total Land Use Projects: o Total Land Use Credits (Points): #VALUEI Section II.a, Page 6 6. MMTC Land Uses Credit Factors Land Use Strate ortation Center 1- as a) O co 2 ) -p > cu o o m o ca v) >' Cr N C � O fl C � N a) ate) c) c c aO ) O L c C m >1 0 1- 2 a) L O O a) N C a) co 7 U >. CV O Q C (4= cn O C a) 'O ._ co as credit factor IF and convenient access for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles and for persons with disabilities. The line with the second C (n a) a) O U a' u) O a) Cfc a) - 4- O _ '0 E w o .a) a c 0 = c6 .c 0 0 —4 L a) 4= a) -a-1 2 v) L 0 C O a) ". d co o •- t} o E �, v) 0 H ca co I— a) M c o co ' Q. �' co 20 "0 co < a) ` a) s U o F_ Y 0 O 'cC ca a) 4- a) o. 2 C a '2) C6 CA v_ 0 - ti) O N tt 'C L Ca 'O C . (, >, a) ,. 0 N CV N C 00 Co C O m _ m a) L sn 2 O O o O LW co - .c E co L O 0) 0 O a) c cc1 a) E.Ea L N a) w a) f0 a) O a) cn _a o C.) v co a) L 0 co co CIS CO CD :4 ' Q iii a) cv -a a) O a)" V O O C v Co - 1 'c a w 0 fA > - N O c co .0 e- C O L ++ > L co O L -c L �. Y O L . .QQ 0. Ol .O_r = O a 'E L C6 Q) A 6 a) N - O .� > -co n O S C +�+ a) d 7 . E — - - ' c • w `- N ch 4>9 .0 +-- O a) 0 X.1 o 0 for you on the land STRATEGY ■--■ H ,--, "««' �t!*+ ', M1f ' ww "M1[ co p • tl <71 <Chi"l • LL V O O 00 00 • 9:7:'17.9., G7 �. '1- VD -c-4 >- CC O 0' CJ 0' 'Q:: O O O O O C' C3' C> t. et, .00' CTN:::0 e-+ C I: M v1 'O N 0 'Cr!. 0 o) O : :t4 .V2 c, ;, sA. rr tr U v. rr :;'st. cis. :tFi: :Oa sh; CC 4r V GS 1) 1t) ) y .....4..,,S, a). s,, : L-Z ):t 44 ).t :$4 f-■ 1-1 f{ it. Ga )-i.' 'F{. .'9:: 3 Q o o Q C Q O 91. co = ma�yy' MM do�.µ�( I o �y mo��./o�}}(( 0�{.� �y}(( .µ CD 1•l:. t-'f !�Y'..'t��.f'. i-i rti = h5' M N 'Fi' 0 0:c..c)fl:00000oc c5:r : ..o, 1, - '4- t.,. }*.:wfi.: — ,-� ,--i — .--r .R"f 4- r++.. Y+,r.:!!`l: • CD r: L- a) - .0 c 0 .0 as 0 4- ._ a) Ws O .�. > c N 1- 1— r s: car rh.: M VD .p ,—, -s W-.� • cry rT: Gtl OO... S b dD .:0, O N N vl vl 'h (11 a) V ,--f e-t:. r-i v- vi"`I'. N N N N .4_ i co � U 0 0 vi v, v, v, teD w . 8) N 8) 1) N: 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q 6. MMTC Land Uses 10 minutes or less M N 10 minutes or less City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 Date Prepared: 11- Mar -13 SECTION Il.b - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CREDIT CLAIMS Total Cap. Imp. Projects: 1 Total Cap. Imp. Credit (Points): 370 1 2 2 1 245.2 3 Other Major Bikeway 5. Scope 6. Units I 5.5 �oute -mile 4 Bike Route Improvement Project -- Issuance of Contrac 7. Str. Name; PV Drive South, PV Drive West, and Hawthorne Blvd. 8. From/To: PV Dr. South, PV Dr. West, & Hawthorne Blvd. 9. Intersection: n/a _1 _ 10. Map Page: 823 11. Participants: City of RPV 12. MTA Funding: 0% 13. Your share of local funding: 100% I 14. Portion of Project within your jurisdiction: 100% 15. Other Info: n/a 18 21 20100 20 23 4 1560 001 3,080 2001 1 $65,000 1 %1 2 I 50% 1 ?540 Section ll.b, Page 9 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 Date Prepared: 11- Mar -13 SECTION II.b - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CREDIT CLAIMS Total Cap. Imp. Projects: 1 Total Cap. Imp. Credit (Points): 370 Section II.b, Page 10 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 Date Prepared: 11- Mar -13 SECTION 'Lb - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CREDIT CLAIMS Total Cap. Imp. Projects: 1 Total Cap. Imp. Credit (Points): 370 Section 11.b, Page 11 City of Rancho Palos 1998 CMP Local Implementation SECTION II.c: Verdes Date Prepared: Report -Modal Transportation Centers - No. 223 11- Mar -13 Credit Claims for Multi #VALUE! 223.0 Multi -modal transportation center 1 1.00 MMTC Project Name: Enter proj. name /contract no. /other description. Transit Component Value: Replace: {'.Enter' With.:*'. !' f not app[ cabt Current Avg Daily Boardings: Prior Year Avg Daily Boardings: Net Increase in Boardings: t Credit Value of Transit Component: Bus Service Type Express Local Shuttle Rail Service Type Total Urban Commuter Enter Enter Enter Enter Enter 0 Enter Enter Enter Enter Enter 0 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 1 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 1 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! Park &Ride Component Value: ....................... R$plap "Enteit" with x 0>" •if'i it: App1t,cab1e Total vehicular parking spaces reserved for commuting: Total lockable bike storage spaces reserved for commuting: paces provided to meet rail station or major bus center (non -MMTC) requirements: Spaces which already received CMP Deficiency Plan credit: Net Park and Ride Spaces Available for credit: Net Credit Value of MMTC Park and Ride Component: Spaces Value Enter Enter Enter Enter #VALUE! #VALUE! Headway Factor; Rei�ce'Eritr" u�r�th !'fl" 4.::00.0p pl! table. '{ ' I:.1 . '. Enter the peak hour headways, in minutes, of the two most frequent transit lines at the MMTC. If any of the headway values exceed 30 minutes, the location does not qualify for credit. 11 111 i. 1111{ {tl tlM W Mfi . . . . .. F:FF All II PM Pk Hr Hdway #1 (minutes): Enter Enter Pk Hr Hdway #2: (minutes): Enter Enter MMTC Headway Rating: 0 MMTC Headway Factor: 1 Prior Credit for Rail Station /Transit Center: Enter Maximum Credit Value of MMTC #VALUE! Str. Name: Enter Thomas Brothers street name for primary street. Cross Street: Enter nearest cross street. Transit Information: Bus /Rail Line # Operator: Avg. Daily Boardings Line No 1 Enter Enter Enter Line No 2 Enter Enter Enter Other Line Enter Enter Enter Amenities: Enter description of MMTC improvements (lighting, waiting area, info, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, ADA facilities, access) Participants: Enter names of other jurisdictions who may claim partial credit of this strategy. Map Page: Enter Thomas Brothers Map page. Year :0.6141,000: post rn i,Qovs 1,06.04 :% arttei patio Curr rtt! 1 i?l0st.Orte Prr©r 'r> :. Crad>tts € i1estohe . Faia' Curl ent Gred tt Value n/a #VALUE! Enter Enter Enter Enter Enter Enter #VALUE! Section II.c, Page 12 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 SECTION II.d - TRANSIT CREDIT CLAIMS Date Prepared: ### ### Total Transit Projects: 1 Total Transit Credit (Points): 420 1 1 2 360,00 3 New or Improved Transit Services 5. Scope: 420 6. Units: PMT 4 PV Fixed Transit (12.5% Ridership increase) TRAIISJ- . SERVICE" "TYPE 'i° ANSJT CI Ebi' VALUE 7. Expres 8. Local 9. Shuttle 10. DialaRide Total 1,795 Credits 420 Current Avg Weekday Ridership: 0 544 0 0 Credit Factor (avg. miles per rider): 7.7 3.3 1.0 4.5 Avg. Daily PMT: 0 1,795 0 I 0 11. First Year of Service: 0 12. Prior credits for ridership: 0 Enter a zero (0) for all blue font entries if the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown 13. Milestone Reached: B -2 14. Milestone Percent Factor: 60% 15. Annual Operating Cost: 418,173 16. Percent Funded Locally: 39% 17. If commuter rail feeder service: 0 18. If urban rail feeder service: 0 19. Prior credits for rail boardings: 0 20. Net 2001 Credit Value: Section II.d, Page 13 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 2001 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 SECTION II.d - TRANSIT CREDIT CLAIMS Date Prepared: ######## Total Transit Projects: 1 Total Transit Credit (Points): 420 Section II.d, Page 14 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1998 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1,1997 - MAY 31,1998 SECTION UU_e . TDM CREDIT CLAIMS Date Prepared: 11-Mar-13 Total TDM Projects: U 1 U U �� �Y TDMCredit (Points): U #VA0B 1 321.0 CMP TDM Ordinance 38.161 1000 Non-Residential buliding permits issued, as reported in Section 1 No other description/entries required for this strategy. This is already done for you. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 U 0.30 U 11 U n/a I n/a U 100% I 3 I n/a I 1OO96 U 11 � x ' ' "--''- 1 #VALUE! 2 Enter 3 0.00 5. Scope: Enter 6. Units: 0 U 4 En��pr��name/oherdeocipi Enter ze (0)�' question does not apply: 7. Total employees in program: Enter 7. Total employees in program: Enter 8. Total employers: Enter 9. Operator of Transit Service: Enter 10. Percerit of Total Fare Subsidized: Enter 11. Net Gain avg monthly participants: '~ ~~~~~ Enter 12. Foci|ity/ContorAddross: Enter street number and address 13. Daily Parking Rate: Enter daily fee rate 14. Fee Increase: Enter parking fee increase, 15. Other Info: I 24 #VALUE! 16 0.00 17 U#V4LUE! 18 U En 18 19 ter 20 Enter 21 Enter 22 ter 23 Enter 24 #VALUE! #\AL UBU Strat 3 0.00 5. Scope: U Enter 6. Units: 0 U 4 Enter proj. name/oiherdeauript. Enter zero (0) if question does not apply: 7. Total employees in program: Enter 8. Tota employers: Enter 9. Operator of Transit Service: Enter 10. Percent of Total Fare Subsidized: Enter 11. Net Gairt avg monthly participants: Enter 12. FacilitylCenter Address: Enter street number arid address 13. Daily Parking Rate: Enter daily fee rate 14. Fee Increase: Enter parking fee increase. 15. Other Info: 16 0.00 I 17 #VALUE! I 18 Enter I 19 I Enter 20 Enter I 21 Enter I 22 Enter I 23 Enter I 24 #VALUE! Section U.e, Page 1b Date Prepared: 11- Mar -13 !Total TDMCredit (Points): 1 #VALUE! 1 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1998 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1,1997 - MAY 31,1998 SECTION 11.e - TDM CREDIT CLAIMS Total TDM Projects: 11 1 #VALUE! l Str2 at # 3 0.00 5. Scope: Enter l 6. U 0 I 4 Enter proj. name /other descript. l Enter zero (0 ) if question does not apply: 7. Total employees in program: Enter 8. Total employers: Enter 9. Operator of Transit Service: Enter 10. Percent of Total Fare Subsidized: Enter 11. Net Gain avg monthly participants: Enter 12. Facility /Center Address: Enter street number and address 13. Daily Parking Rate: Enter daily fee rate 14. Fee Increase: Enter parking fee increase. 15. Other Info: 16 0.00 17 I #VALUE! 18 I Enter 19 I Enter 20 I Enter 21 Enter 22 Enter 23 Enter 24 I #VALUE! 1 #VALUE! 2 l Strat # 3 0.00 5. Scope: _ Enter 6. U Units: 0 l 4 Enter proj. name /other descript. Enter zero (0) if question does not apply: 7. Total employees in program: Enter 8. Total employers: Enter 9. Operator of Transit Service: Enter 10. Percent of Total Fare Subsidized: Enter 11. Net Gain avg monthly participants: Enter 12. Facility /Center Address: Enter street number and address 13. Daily Parking Rate: Enter daily fee rate 14. Fee Increase: Enter parking fee increase. 15. Other Info: 16 0.00 11 I 17 #VALUE! 18 I Enter I 19 Enter 11 I 20 Enter I 21 Enter I 22 Enter I 23 Enter I 24 #VALUE! Section II.e, Page 16