The URL can be used to link to this page

CC RES 2002-034RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PRAPARED IN CONNECTION WITH A PROPOSED HOTEL AND RELATED USES TO BE KNOWN AS THE LONG POINT RESORT. WHEREAS, a formal application was filed by Destination Development Corporation (the "Developer ") requesting approval of conditional use permits, grading permits, a coastal development permit and a tentative parcel map (collectively the "discretionary permits ") and a general plan amendment to allow construction of a 550 - room (400 guest rooms and 50 -3 keyed casitas) resort hotel and conference center, 32 private villas, and a 9 -hole golf course on 103.5 acres of land generally located at 6610 Palos Verdes Drive South and 64.9 acres of land generally located at 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard, as more fully described in the project EIR (herein referred to as "Initial Project "); and, WHEREAS, the Initial Project has since been revised to eliminate the portion of the Project that called for the use of 64.9 acres of publicly -owned land generally located at 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard and commonly known as Upper Point Vicente Area ( "UPVA "), while the remainder located on 103.5 acres of privately -owned land generally located at 6610 Palos Verdes Drive South and formerly occupied by Marineland (the "Resort Hotel Area" or "RHA ") remains in the project (herein referred to as "Revised Project "); and, WHEREAS, the City analyzed the Initial Project's potential impacts on the environment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §21000 et seq.), the State CEQA Guidelines (the "Guidelines ") (14 Cal. Code Regs. §15000 et seq.) promulgated with respect thereto, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines; and, WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Environmental Study (the "Initial Study ") for the Initial Project pursuant to Section 15063 of the Guidelines; and, WHEREAS, the Initial Study concluded that there was evidence that the Project might have a significant environmental impact on several specifically identified resources and governmental services, including aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, land -use and planning, noise, public services, recreation, transportation, and utilities and service systems; and, Resolution No. 2002 -34 Environmental Impact Report May 7, 2002 Page 1 of 7 WHEREAS, based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, the City ordered the preparation of an environmental impact report (the "EIR ") for the Project in accordance with the provisions of Guidelines Sections 15064 and 15081; and, WHEREAS, the City prepared and circulated a Notice of Preparation of the EIR from . July 20, 2000, through September 4, 2000, for an extended 45 -day comment period in order to receive written comments on the appropriate scope of the EIR; and, WHEREAS, the City sent the Notice of Preparation to the State Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research for the State of California (the "State Clearinghouse ") and to other responsible, trustee, and /or interested agencies and persons in accordance with Guidelines Section 15082(a); and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Guidelines Section 15083, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public scoping session concerning the EIR on August 22, 2000, to provide an introduction to the Project and the CEQA process and to afford an opportunity for the public and interested agencies to comment on the issues to be analyzed in the EIR; and, WHEREAS, the scoping session was noticed by publication in the local press, by mailing to all residents within a 500 -foot radius of the Project and by posting at City Hall, Hesse Park, and the Ladera Linda Community Center and was attended by the applicant, representatives of various agencies, and members of the general public; and, WHEREAS, the Draft Environmental Impact Report (the "DEIR "), together with those certain technical appendices (the "Appendices "), was completed on February 2, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the City circulated the DEIR and the Appendices to the public, the State Clearinghouse, and other interested persons between February 6, 2001, and April 6, 2001, for an expanded 60 -day comment period pursuant to Guidelines Section 15087(c); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on March 23, 20001, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence regarding the DEIR; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on April 10, 2001, April 14, 2001, April 24, 2001, May 17, 2001, June 12, 2001, July 10, 2001, and July 24, 2001, at which times all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence regarding the Project and the DEIR; and, Resolution No. 2002 -34 Environmental Impact Report May 7, 2002 Page 2 of 7 WHEREAS, during the public review and comment process, the City received over 30 hours of public testimony and more than 300 written and oral comments regarding the Project and the adequacy of the DEIR; and, WHEREAS, the City prepared written responses to all comments and made revisions and additions to the DEIR in response to the comments; and, WHEREAS, the City completed the responses to comments on the DEIR and preliminary revisions to the DEIR in July 2001 and distributed those responses to commenting agencies and the public in accordance with the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21092.5; and, WHEREAS, after reviewing the responses to comments and the revisions to the DEIR, City staff concluded that the revised material in the biological resources analysis (Section 5.3 of the DEIR) constituted new information requiring recirculation of the biological resources analysis of the DEIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.1 and Guidelines Section 15088.5; and, WHEREAS, the City recirculated the Revised Biological Resources Analysis to the public, the State Clearinghouse, and other interest persons between August 1, 2001, and August 30, 2001, for a shortened 30 -day comment period pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15087(c) and 15105(a) (the "Second Public Review and Comment Period "); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further held duly noticed public hearings on August 14, 2001, August 28, 2001, and September 11, 2001, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence regarding the Project, the DEIR, and the Revised Biological Resources Analysis; and, WHEREAS, during the Second Public Review and Comment Period, the City received several hours of testimony and 15 written and oral comments regarding the Project and the adequacy of the Revised Biological Resources Analysis; and, WHEREAS, the City prepared written responses to all comments and made revisions and additions to the Revised Biological Resources Analysis where appropriate in response to the comments received during the Second Public Review and Comment Period; and, WHEREAS, the City completed the Responses to Comments on the Revised Biological Resources Analysis on September 24, 2001, and distributed those responses to commenting agencies and the public at least ten (10) days prior to considering the Final Environmental Impact Report (the "FEIR "); and, WHEREAS, on October 9, 2001, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public meeting to consider the FEIR, and adopted P.C. Resolution No. 2001 -37 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO Resolution No. 2002 -34 Environmental Impact Report May 7, 2002 Page 3of7 PALOS VERDES MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPT A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPT A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION WITH GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 28, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 215, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 216, GRADING PERMIT NO. 2229, GRADING PERMIT NO. 2230, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 166, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26073 FOR A PROPOSED HOTEL AND GOLF COURSE TO BE KNOWN AS THE LONG POINT RESORT;" and, WHEREAS, on May 7, 2002, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider, among other things, certification of the Final EIR for the Long Point project; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the EIR documentation completed for the Initial Project, and relies on the review process completed through the Planning Commission's hearings on the EIR. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Final Environmental Impact Report (the "FEIR ") is comprised of five volumes: Volume 1 is the FEIR dated July 9, 2001; Volume 2 contains the Technical Appendices in support of the FEIR; Volume 3 contains the Responses to Comments on the DEIR; Volume 4 is the Revised Biological Resources Analysis, and Volume 5 contains the Responses to Comments on the Revised Biological Resources Analysis. The Planning Commission reviewed the FEIR at a duly noticed public meeting on October 9, 2001 (the "P.C. Hearing ") at which time evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Notice of the time, place and purpose of the P.C. Hearing was provided in accordance with applicable law. Based upon the record of the Hearing, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council certify the completeness and adequacy of the FEIR and to recommend approval of the general plan amendment and the discretionary permits for the Project to the City Council. Further, the City Council reviewed the FEIR at a duly noticed public hearing (the "Council Hearing ") on May 7, 2002, at which time evidence was presented and considered by the City Council. Based upon the records of the P.C. Hearing and the Council Hearing, the Council voted to certify the completeness and adequacy of the FEIR. Section 2. The findings made in this Resolution are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the FEIR and upon other substantial evidence which has been presented in the record of this proceeding. The documents, staff reports, technical studies, appendices, plans, specifications, and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution is based are on file and Resolution No. 2002 -34 Environmental Impact Report May 7, 2002 Page4of7 available for public examination during normal business hours with the Director of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement, who serves as the custodian of these records. Section 3. The City Council finds that pursuant to Guideline Sections 15087(e) and 15105, agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the FEIR. Section 4. The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the contents of the FEIR pursuant to Guidelines Section 15084(e). The City Council hereby finds that the FEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City and the City Council. The City Council further finds that the additional information provided in the staff reports, in the responses to comments received after recirculation of the Revised Biological Resources Analysis, and in the evidence presented in written and oral testimony at the Hearing, does not constitute new information requiring a second recirculation of the FEIR under CEQA. None of the information presented to the Planning Commission or City Council after recirculation of the Revised Biological Resources Analysis has deprived the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial environmental impact of the Project or a feasible mitigation measure or alternative that the City has declined to implement. All feasible mitigation measures suggested in the FEIR have been considered. Those measures, as applicable, shall be incorporated as a condition of project approval for any approval under this EIR. No additional feasible mitigation measures or alternatives have been identified. Section 5. The City Council finds that the comments regarding the DEIR, the Revised Biological Resources Analysis, and the responses to those comments have been received by the City; that the Planning Commission has received public testimony regarding the adequacy of the FEIR; and that the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered all such documents and testimony prior to making its recommendation to the City Council on the Initial Project. The City Council hereby certifies that the FEIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15090. Section 6. Based upon the Initial Study and the record before the City Council, the City Council finds that the Initial Project would not cause significant environmental impacts in the areas of Agricultural Resources, Mineral Resources, Objectionable Odors, Hazards and Hazardous Materials and Population and Housing. Explanations for why the City Council determined that the Project will have no impact or will cause a less than a significant impact to the foregoing resources are contained in the Initial Study (included as Appendix 15.1 to the FEIR) and in Section 10.0 of the FEIR in accordance with the provisions of Guidelines Section 15128. Section 7. Based upon the FEIR and the record before the City Council, the City Council finds that the Initial Project, as mitigated (attached herein as Exhibit "A "), would not cause significant environmental impacts in the areas of Aesthetics /Light and Glare, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology, Soils and Seismicity, Hydrology and Drainage, Land Use and Relevant Planning, Marine Resources, Noise, Resolution No. 2002 -34 Environmental Impact Report May 7, 2002 Page 5 of 7 Public Health and Safety, Public Services and Utilities, Traffic and Circulation, and Recreational Facilities. Explanations for why the foregoing impacts were found to be insignificant are fully discussed in Section 5.0 of the FEIR, the Revised Biological Resources Analysis, and the Initial Study (included as Appendix 15.1 to the FEIR). Section 8. Based upon the FEIR and the record before the City Council, the City Council finds that the Initial Project would create significant unavoidable impacts in the impact categories of Air Quality (short -term air pollutants and long -term operational impacts) and Noise (long -term impacts). These significant impacts are further described in the in Section 5.0 of the FEIR. The construction - related significant impacts to Air Quality that would arise from the Initial Project are associated with construction equipment and grading activities and that would be temporary in nature, while the operational significant impacts to Air Quality would be long term in natures The long -term significant impacts to Noise are attributable to Initial Project - related traffic. Although the Initial Project's individual contribution would not be significant, the existing ambient noise levels exceed State standards; when Initial Project - generated and cumulative vehicular noise are combined, the result would cause a significant and unavoidable noise impact on a cumulative level. All applicable and feasible mitigation measures, and any changes or alterations required to minimize impacts, will be required of, or incorporated into, any project considered in conjunction with the certified EIR. Further explanation for these determinations may be found in Section 5.0 of the FEIR. Section 9. Based upon the FEIR and the record before the City Council, the City Council finds that the Initial Project's cumulative impacts, with the exception of the impacts to Noise and Air Quality, are not significant. Further explanation for this determination may be found in Section 5.0 of the FEIR and the Revised Biological Resources Analysis. Section 10. Section 7.0 of the FEIR describes, and the City Council has fully considered, a reasonable range of alternatives to the Project which might fulfill the basic objectives of the Project. These alternatives include "Alternative 7.1 - No Development Alternative," "Alternative 7.2 - No Project Alternative," "Alternative 7.3 - With Coast Guard Site Alternative," "Alternative 7.4 - Relocate Practice Facility - Option `A' Alternative," "Alternative 7.5 - Relocate Practice Facility - Option `B' Alternative," "Alternative 7.6 - No Resort Villas - Option `A' Alternative," "Alternative 7.7 - No Resort Villas - Option `B' Alternative," "Alternative 7.8 - Program of Utilization Alternative," "Alternative 7.9 - Point Vicente Park Enhancement Alternative," and "Alternative 7.10 - Point Vicente Park Enhancement and Existing Entitlement Alternative." The City Council further finds that the Initial Project would result in unacceptable adverse environmental impacts. The City Council further finds that a good faith effort was made to incorporate alternatives into the preparation of the FEIR, and that all reasonable alternatives were considered in the review process of the FEIR Section 11. For the environmental impacts identified in the FEIR as "significant and unavoidable," namely in the impact areas of Air Quality and Noise, the City Council hereby acknowledges that the City Council must adopt a "Statement of Resolution No. 2002 -34 Environmental Impact Report May 7, 2002 Page 6 of 7 Overriding Considerations" before approving any project, including the Revised Project. The City Council further acknowledges that each of the mitigation measures identified in the FEIR, and attached herein as Exhibit A, shall be adopted, as applicable, for any project approved pursuant to this EIR, and each mitigation measure shall be imposed as a condition of Project approval, as applicable, to any project approved pursuant to this EIR. Finally, the City Council hereby adopts the "Mitigation Monitoring Program" which is presented herein as Exhibit "A ". Section 12. The City Council, by adopting this resolution certifies the Final EIR Prepared for the Initial Project, and in no way approves any project associated with the Final EIR. Further, nothing in this resolution shall be construed as approval or authorization for any use of the City's Upper Point Vicente property, regardless of the analysis included in the FEIR. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 2002, by the following vote: State of California County of Los Angeles City of Rancho Palos Verdes 1, JO PURCELL, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, do hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 2002 -34 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at regular meeting thereof held on May 7, 2002 Resolution No. 2002 -34 Environmental Impact Report May 7, 2002 Page 7of7 LONG POINT RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13.0 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Section 2.0 of this BR identifies the mitigation measures that will be implemented to reduce the impacts associated with the Long Point Specific Plan project. The California Environment Quality Act (CECIA) was amended in 1989 to add Section 21081.6, which requires a public agency to adopt a monitoring and reporting program for assessing and ensuring compliance with any required mitigation measures applied to proposed development. As stated in Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code, ". . . the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted, or made a condition of project approval, in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment." Section 21081.6 provides general guidelines for implementing mitigation monitoring programs and indicates that specific reporting and/or monitoring requirements, to . be enforced during project implementation, shall be defined priorto final certification of the EIR. The mitigation monitoring table below lists those mitigation measures that may be included as conditions of approval for the project. These measures correspond to those outlined in Section 2.0 and discussed in Section 5.0. To ensure that the mitigation measures are properly implemented, a monitoring program has been devised which identifies the timing and responsibility for monitoring each measure. The developer will have the responsibility for implementing the measures, and the various City of Rancho Palos Verdes departments will have the primary responsibility for monitoring and reporting the implementation of the mitigation measures. H O ce ce a O~ w a Z_ O1- az (D w z2 Oz JO re Z w MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING CHECKLIST VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Monitoring, and Party Reporting Process' Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure/Conditions of Approval Milestone for Monitoring Initials Date ? Remarks AESTHETICS /LIGHT AND GLARE 0) `o 0) c _ o E c .c .( c o c w y_ -t E E as E 0) `o 0) c _ o .E c .c .( c o c w O - O E as E 0) G) c0 0 u o— oE 0-0_ 0) G) c0 0 u o- of 0-0_ o U 0) U G) C I m EL o U O) U G) c I m EL The proposed Golf Clubhouse shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department so that the maximum finished height within horizontal limits of the Point Fermin corridor from Palos Verdes Drive South does not exceed the 16 -foot height limitations set forth in the adopted Coastal Specific Plan, so that the view of Point Fermin is not obstructed. Alternatively, the Applicant may submit an application for a Conditional Use Permit to the City Planning Commission to construct buildings in excess of 16 feet as permitted under Section 17.22.D of the Development Code. The two easternmost casitas, as well as any and all tennis courts or other structures, shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department so that the maximum finished height within horizontal limits of the Point Fermin corridor from Palos Verdes Drive South does not exceed the 16 -foot height limitation set forth in the adopted Coastal Specific Plan, so that the view of Point Fermin is not obstructed. Alternatively, the Applicant may submit an application for a conditional use permit to the City Planning Commission to construct buildings in excess of 16 feet as permitted under Section 17.22.D of the Development Code. c o oz 0 m v 10 -I- 10 Exh.bit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 1 of 55 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 2a7 AIR QUALITY Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring c_, CE ƒ ƒ \a CO \299 \ai / O jm CO 22 \§ \ai/ 0 jm f ( 0_ a/ .§[ 0_ o_ c _ \( \\§ 0o _ \( E\§ 0/ o \ E \ ( • \O } ( gt %\ ƒ7 The resort Villa buildings shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department so that the maximum finished height within the horizontal limits of the Catalina View Corridor from Palos Verdes Drive South conform to the height restrictions set forth in the adopted Coastal Specific Plan - in particular that buildings in Height Zone 1 (closest to Palos Verdes Drive) do no exceed the 16 -foot height limitation and those in Height Zone 2 do not exceed the 30 -foot height limitations, so that the view of Catalina Island is not obstructed. Alternatively, the Applicant may submit an application for a conditional use permit to the City Planning Commission to construct buildings in excess of 16 feet as permitted under Section 17.22.D of the Development Code. In accordance with the City Development Code and SCAQMD Rules, the Project Applicant shall incorporate the following measures during the construction phase of the Project to the satisfaction of the SCAQMD and City Public Works Director. Compliance with this measure is subject to periodic field inspections by the SCAQMD and City Public Works Director. Grading: 0 0 / a a Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 2a7 VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Party 06 0 -1-, O 0 ID O w a- O ECG QU U NU 0 c w 0 U 0 O) U ) i O co- 0 0 U ID )2 U) _ c ii o U U D N o O- i U) N C 0 U) O -O O) U) -O - '6 C 4) (o O N O T C (o N O' O U) >,O U) o —D�� 0 —. — o o O O N (6 X LC) 0) U) (6 w D O CO -O N-C N -O 'C O 1.- O C" O O = O N O U O '- -O N E O 73 N O a) U -'' .. , C O- N N 2 E c O- w co O N (� > _ E _ O ON O O 4 O U) . D U N O tp- C N (o -o O' C U O N N c N ' a--� 73 U c (o (o X N as Q` N C V (o N 0 N_ 0 0 0 0 O U) O >O N (6 O o C O 13 4) ?� 'O N O V U O j N N O L C) 06 O (o �' L N— C N .2 U) (o C ., — , U) O N -0 ? N 2 O O O N W N (6 .- — N C c ci, (o O U O U) U -O C C Y O C E D C U U >, w C O ._ (o C .O (o U E .a - 0 N (6 Y 0 >, U) O N Q" (o +`" w C. O O U o) '5 c 0_03_2 N (o c Q O— O a._ C N U> Et I W (o E a> U O.. Q o E E_ (o U . . • • . uj -O 0 (o 0- N U O) O O C C 5 o N-0 > O O N C N 2 >, N C (6 U N L N O co > Q 5 O O N O N D O O >, c c N U) -O m (6 'C 0 c O O D (6 Q U) .W (o 5 > Y a` N vi N 0 0 L O N 2 L 7 N Q cm ..X O O E co (o N U) •O (>o O c (6 N U 0 co . • r c 0 oz U' D N O 10 0 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 3 of 55 VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 2 ow &e 0_2 < .g CO O 2 c c ow '2E &e CE 0_2 < .g ® & : CO j O 6 = 0) = * eo =o_= _•_'- _ = c =2 ®k= W0 E 2,.\•k == CE/ 0_- C /'y[E� j�0- =� 2 4- o* (1) -0 _ E %e §z 3 * \ =\._ _ =0= =22 f_ay ®l - ` -O� °E �© t / 7 E » \ c� y \ 0§ e § co (Ti e \R/ #_wC [ —§ a \\ /#\ / / 00E E____ e0 ==� e==at® ��` *&/ =f\�E® /c \( /} `•C (1 )w / \�� E 2 »� ��j�f)6 >0 Eo© z29 -° 0 - -3 -3 °°8.x®ƒ4- §=k <.w2 \_22k /f ©\k\\\ 0 (wCX( ) ƒ =»277= 0- a4E.E == < -O-o § _____ *��_ _ ° =o= = = = =a &k 0- ` «ekk®t • E.»f\ \ *y7CO D /Eww maaam0 �22J�± /� \ //- .-- = {#TO0(1) 0 TO 2-r°0 \0233 -c ®® =22` _°` =« = - °E = ._ = e / G e t�ffk\E (@c ®ow 2G) ° 7»§«§.2,E2 � % St3 =�-o o =f ° =e ° '- C 7- [72 - --w 02E �u�wo- 0° -E'- /\{f / <kE��7792 0 22._ C_ \ /)wcC0 BEjC =eo »= = =4 ( os®®- w2 o egg £e- .-02I >==.E%y _�__ =° =E# °eee= / /C3W `\ \2\° f } \qa a -0a±/} Qu, = §f «»= o = - _ w 4 at oG) ( - .- \ *»¥\_ , >D0 0 /\a¥ /a \\k�° -/ 0D(1) °k±7 \ °e %En2oae • .... 2 A a Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 4a7 bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 5a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring ®3 ° °° E ,_>,§ oa o= o : - ° a ® ® 2 0W f / /f�m ��5e%� -_« °2 /=`�j® 0• _ .- ƒ -» ®_- °woo_ e o/ =2 222' =o _ = q =e o _/ \67ƒ# c = ® \E/ a/ =22.[ ___ \ \�= = •n_ 0_ u) 0 -• -L— o 77§0°7\ z u) = e.g U) U) 22 %faa -' -'(- a \ef °/[ Sy`S %t =f&) = =+may« _��_ _• °_ / 9 � = ( o %qc =oog 5 8 2= = EkG`E f g = ��®k = =/7,`= %� / »}7\ .�= =emu= f73aw2= e =0 cao«�= �S>2.= e -oow"c % o o == F E 2/ °« °c �- a.=a \o2 /4- =z 6 ° ° _ c - -° •- e -0 X20) =f \� " == -0 e ® .- o =ofq f�� /�k / \/� Q$= w_ 0_ e _» =0U) 0-EE k ■ o (1) " /q0) e* =0_0= w °-5 o q k c 3 = E# ®.a == .? E_� ®= a« -q._ _ \g / 0cc0 - w / &[zw¥ // \ <O2 _ \e = /�= ® =7 0_ 02/ 72- 2 = ®G -��® e® °kU) /E2w o «e= o�= ° - ° °w.2w w ¥ % 0- m H W f U) 0- • C E0G) -0 __ r - o.%E�= c��oo.«E e = e _ & O0 -�Q_= e o §#� /fa \-, g0 03.-:= CD-. (1)-0 _ \/ _ = co e � ¥.g _�� 29w = ®eo G- •0-« e == o Cl- °° _0E7 \f\ =�2.- ±J'0) k - =02 _7 = / + %§i agu�� =._ 3CO3C L_w °•- =. =E�»•-, 2- _f / /k±e -o = ° ®a §±3 K= H w E E e • e a ®-0 Ao La bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 5a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page ea7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring ->C )E\\g 2« =2= «£==- a7 =p== asap e= e == =�ƒt o o= %< ƒ� \ \ \»� \/ ƒwee S« ® %2 %7 §q 6\ _ • e = G = 2 E _._ °.® •/§ /7u)o,,, tot® > _ __. -E_ «0- =E� > _ _ =3 w G 2 / \ &. = o z a /° e 7 0'a = § E % e.g e ® . e = ®at o§G G \E��g* =>EE2•E0ga{.\ 2 =$ /2 »�$� \g /f[S[AD3�- & &e =$ =\e =®o [\ \5j \2 /_tea =co�o�a ®( 0 = ® \ °-e / =3 e oe =. - =2 ®�= =_� ®= e - =O 0 -0•-3= �7� =° • a..)c 0 e > ƒ °k) /0-2-06 \/\ ®S_ &3 =�� . E �g /&a¥ /y=§ == ° = =o _° o2< E- e# ;m =� .=E % =�§\2 =e o $�wE o �- o� a §/c `_ ° ® °-° ®° 0) 2L zzz5=ui 0� 02%02 °6§203° (1) E. �/7\/ 0>(p E°( O -°/ f` _ « ca = == /\_o o —(D a /� &@\t ®* 2ƒ\20\ _�& e= \3�c« - & -2J� /yE = =�W= e®= q0 == X22 /=% [37�eo MOO), =We ==-0 E_ = S = 4= ou) cam` =_ =o E 5`\�. >a = "0� $ O c:.-' = — S.E k = ` — _ _ e _ = g =./ a ? / G $ �e »- = c %9 c3 33y e0- °§5§ ƒ2 �° -° -r- /�f.,Lt0 L_ /\j \°\ §/\}[_( > -.—, 0 °& -0)- -C 272» 0 (1) - °E «o¥$\ nCO0 < _C 0_ eo = =.g= £ee&�.g\000Ec =__U) 0_ ®7 Ao in Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page ea7 bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 7a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring _ = c_ .[ % o9 o9 k� k� G{ / .g / .g ® & Ico \j O O c_ .[ % G{ ® & \j 2a\ ®$= 2® _- < e e - ° > o E /��6= k � 2 C ( W 2 o _ \ } (2 } ) _ =e = ^ °= ® 7777 ®22§ _ .- . c 2 ± _.! e = �±[7\� =$c 2E7D a� \�\ \\k (1) /S - \ \ c- of ƒ} \ \ � C0 o §y §e § og2 / \R/ E_wC [ —§ 7 \\ /#\ E / / O -° E CD CD Confirmation of Compliance With the FESA >0- c- ncE --° G)cC ffff«q W( H oa- ®ae��eeE Eoye g[ }$ / }\&£� =e7�t\ E ea QE§ \ / = §_ §&`�` ®§& \�j\{'(�q �)`.g%` o� EE /«k2� ®_( =6) G�>a =$3@ " e e� =o® i7=`= �comm .®aq«2 °y2 ®(1)(1) /� =2 cflw /%f�2�U / /�22° ®t =f%/ e� c. -'"—C e =ee� ="=��_ C f.5 & \ o e o =fl ww o_® 3'« II _o_ �_� ___ _ / \ \ eu)®®fKf# -r", ..= ®\ /= e-7 /=�= ƒf23 ° °.\__.5 a)o /��) - 4-J%`\ %2e.e ®& �0( /2 /WCU)C c CW-C §\\%C2E \7± e \�S®t'\� /)\Sco oo ee\W_ � \7 ®@- E -0 = =� =_� °°i CD -2 ®® / �o\Ge= - ±R-2.$ §�2 =2&w�t._w >° °`2 -6 202 =`£= «% ®_oo . Ofl.- W \ =2�kEef� \/@9%## §2k o_ e =•= - =�- _ - o ) ®k /(00W 0° (G) �Ew00 /\k =5eo=a0Q_a(1)D(0.EQ=0oQQ0( Prior to Demolition Permit issuance, the Project Applicant shall comply with the FESA (through either Section 4[d], 7, or 10) with regards to any impacts to the coastal California gnatcatcher. The LPHCP has been developed to ensure compliance with FESA and to be consistent with the City's NCCP, when adopted. The LPHCP would provide for the creation of 16.80 acres of new coastal sage scrub habitat area (UPVA \ r 0 \ r bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 7a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 8 of 55 Party Monitoring,' and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring 0) a"' C C •�� CE m -t c Q TO U 0 D O oo� Q a, Q O Q 0 >,m U 0) a", C C .Ew CE (6 -t c Q TO U 0 c o 0 ., , U O (6 E N O 0 0 O N o� 0 C C. O C L E .O O N >' O O '' 00— w E.> O N V C EOQ O t z� U0 O N p 0 (6 4_ O U >, - U .) w f O — 0 0_ = o 0 U N 0 -c U O a4--, O00 Confirmation of Compliance With the FESA > CO ,.- o 0 c c m o }, .o c E0_ U0_ J Conservation Planning Area and Recreation Area). This, combined with the 14.63 acres of existing coastal sage scrub habitat, the 4.44 acres of coastal bluff scrub habitat, and the 3.87 acres of rocky shore /coastal bluff habitat that would be retained, would result in the protection and /or creation of a total of 39.74 acres of coastal sage scrub, coastal bluff scrub, and rocky shore /coastal bluff habitat. No more than seven days prior to commencement of demolition activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey to determine whether Cooper's hawk, burrowing owl, northern harrier, white - tailed kite, prairie falcon, and peregrine falcon, or other raptor species, are nesting in or adjacent to the impact area. In the event nesting is not occurring, construction work may proceed. In the event an active nest is present, construction work shall be prohibited within 300 feet of the nest (or as otherwise determined by the Project biologist) until fledglings have left the nest. Results of the surveys shall be provided to USFWS, CDFG, and the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. All habitat revegetation activities identified in the LPHCP shall be initiated prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the hotel, to the satisfaction of the City. The LPHCP shall contain habitat restoration and enhancement design details for the Conservation Planning Areas through revegetation with drought - tolerant species, transitional areas of planting between the Conservation Area and Resort Hotel /Recreation Planning Areas, and design for i.i Z ('7 p io0 ('7 10 co 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 8 of 55 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 9 of 55 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' City Planning Department City- Approved Engineer with the Assistance of a City- Approved Biologist a) co � O � o O 0 w o_ O Q O) N C O Q O O O j, C '( Tm U c) Q U in a) , o Q O ) QO — < O_ Tm U Prior to Issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Hotel Prior to Grading Permit Issuance o) _o -O O) j Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 10 of 55 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring D a) o Q 0) ` 0- o < .0 >, m U Planning Department City Planning Department Construction Supervisor and City- Approved Biologist 0-)o c U 2 i 0 u 0 , o E i N 0- 0- Prior to Grading Permit Issuance Prior to Grading Permit Issuance Prior to Grading Permit Issuance c 0 0 > D N Field Verification Field Verification Field Verification box - thorn. The pedestrian trail shall be located to the inland side of the native plant buffer. The trail is approximately 4 feet wide and shall be fenced to limit intrusion into the native plant buffer. Inland of the trail, a non - invasive plant zone 50 feet wide shall be established. The plants within this 50 foot zone shall contain only drought tolerant and non - invasive species. The final plant pallet for this area shall be reviewed by a restoration ecologist/biologist. In addition, non - native plant species within the existing coastal bluff scrub habitat at the uppermost portions of the bluff face shall be removed by hand. The native plant buffer area shall be maintained and monitored for a minimum of five years. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, fencing shall be installed along the edge of all conservation, restoration, and enhancement areas to discourage human encroachment into those areas that would not be encroached upon except as a result of Project implementation. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, signs shall be placed on all fencing installed along the edge of all conservation, restoration, and enhancement areas prohibiting entrance into these areas. Earth- moving equipment shall not maneuver in areas outside the identified limits of grading in order to avoid disturbing open space areas that are proposed to remain undeveloped. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the natural open space limits shall be marked by the construction supervisor and the Project biologist. These limits i.i...z'.. co o io 0 co 10 co 10 co 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 10 of 55 Construction ccG) O a3 > O O O O u) Q o o o > UU Field Verification Field Verification c O O c o 0 •o m me a)c E E C c a3 O u) '- 0 Q -0 O-0 C O a) C C O (n �' a3 D a) a) C Q) cO a1)ac) s a3a1).o -C.— o ww°� �° mw �� o f `o o m c o c o • ro C 0 QO > a3 O C O� a3 . ° N O .� O a) E?:') EL �m o � � o oc�.2 8 a>i ic c° o�° a3. - • >,E uw) w o 0— M c o m ,_(D °° o QC -o m o-c mU w Q)i� �' `� °-E �°occcc �° m°)m� m��E ��a)a) O C L O a3 a3 O E °- C.. > E L +� z O U Q m >.0- °uu1 c c • a3Q)c. W• 0) mE -O a3 W a) 0 'o • O LL • a3 E c -°c •O-.c `mo E a30.c • • O o0 6' o ° o m a3 a3 0 o E o° 80_.8 c -0 0 a) iii o u)• D_ c • .- -0.� • .92 U O �� a3 .� U• -o O H O O C O N (C6 U • ° O 0 C O W- O 0— U N D o D E W m OU c '° c Q • o aUi o c-C a°i m n �0U �< °- • � � • c� 2 ° ao To _o 'p -O a3 < c a) ? o) a--, Q C a) i N (6 Oa3° c o a30 > :o ( mma3QO_c 0- O a3 0 a) }' O w o W o ,— O s rn n n > - LL _. o = a3 O- O C O N }' a3 -O O C a .� ' O- O 2 'E 0 o 03 CO .� N c H ° a3U o o <.- a3 �QQ TD_ 0_ ° OD • CO Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 11 of 55 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 12 of 55 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' C a) (1) (6 a) O O i (6 7 .- - a) 0 O)'. u) 0 ( (� O_ E (o a) •O -0 O -0 N O (0 a3 a3 Q C a) 0 O N (0 O C a3 (0 +) U _C (0 (n C >, (n U C a3 -c N U= 0- ~ C C O 0 E�°�a) O (1) I— o ff 0 0 0_ O m °� X 0 0 (n U U a3 _c E O) a) O (1) (n0- CO -O 0 — a) - C U) X _ (h - O 0' E (n (0 - -O (0 C C> a) Q- a) O O O a) cE'- E�E(na) a) .O N a) •U a3X 7 ` O r,... 0 V 0 a) D a) - C Q N Q N -O Q O O C E U C O C a) O C a) '(6 O_ c a) O O • C (n . (6 O) C _.W O O 0 > 0 u) O O U ( O u) (6 E 0 CO a asc° °�' �� „Do (1) • _ - c a) = N N U C O C co w.- 5 0_ = U E O ,0 a) O E C U -- c U Q (0 a) (n a. 0_ (n. .- (n c - -0 . -'� CO -O — -O a) (,3 (C6 O a) O O O — -0.co L_ U Q 0 U O 0 0 L O a) O > a) C a) 7 '- N a) - -C 0_a) n.E_ < -0 T p �.� co _c 0 a) -c•—pc (1) a)- a) -O - _c N (06 U 0 I- C co E a"' C U (h 0 a3 co_ a) 0 O O 0 �_ (0 0 O -O .- U O O - O) a) > Z u) 0 C •E cr, > (0 (0 0_ a) U U c o C N V C c c - mC O) O O O> '(6 C . ,- o E E (CO E 0 •10 0- — - >, U) - 6 N E (0 (n `-' O .(B c c O C .o (6 0_' -m 0 p) O a) a) c E a) -° .0 O O .0 (0 C ' E E O— E O O O E j i U a) C a) _c .� a) O - O H, 0O) C (h N -O O Cr3 ^a)EUO eL ,— u) (n >, _c a) C_o co a` a) 0-00 O ' i O U_C 7 0 Q Z.� 0- CS TD- a) . C...O'. iii `. z O)-0 () O 14-i U Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 12 of 55 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 1aa7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' �f /2Jf ®f22 - w -. f -. e.= \\$ =$= =7±/ EWe=SaaL-O� �{E /w\ = \// D 0)c » e� _E SEER ±y /E %ate =4 B Q) Q) * =o= 7fa>® pG) — 0 \ _ a = \2 /5\ })ƒ /\ a =� =®e = 03 *./ ®— \ G _ _ E • ° ° ° ®� # /2 =2\\[ -5 = E \\'0moo0o ee 0.- + 22�RR�� ƒ�� =� =e= = =% E +E' #==.a.l=wti w _ ®«a6w0• E E a • ='a 3> 0 o a= e t y E$ 2 3 2 o e zzfe /« _ / =�3.g� & §(22/ '- / \ }(� &a =o = =0 =�2-o• _ o_C a /03 0.7 0_ _ 0w c. = \_» ®G (& % /to ®/2 2 ` °) E.! a = _ ®t— Q) f_ 9\ ® =7 [ }E zzz 0(00 0 &�(�\\/ c222> = o� _L --.1 0_ ED • -0 c -0 '' =o\ *= —moo /aeEe� -0 a) =oo� =o =ems \ƒ7272: 2 ` ° °=��eE »,)2iƒ \ \/ =37( =g W ±§ =2203 ®%G //= e — \� -y�u�c —G a< — =U.= +a 2a��®—ege= ®® =%(03¥7._= == 0 w_ L_ e 0___, x 0, 0 \ © = ®7�`2//e2 =ate= 03±2_ ® =02 Ew � ke� c`c� ® «/ % /% =.=fe = =e= _ = c • _ _ * ®� =� = = g� = = =o mo_w w0» 3\ »© y$a— = \S \-L- e� 2 0 02 =a (k \\j /\)\ /�f/ t23o > =L_ .ae= _0- mce =o== = == =a0_ %e -�0eQe =e=we • ...z7° \\ 6 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 1aa7 bhwA -ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 14a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' 2« §\ 200 \° 0 § 2 >j\ � �} ¥t ƒ _ • O( 0G § - E =1-0 \\ \/ 0 ct «= /wp =.g2._ . j/ _0fl - /\oy _= _ °_ w\ 0023 �)E /\ » = =oy 0- 0) o cm2:° 'is CO _= c2 = =� °`(c 0 \G 0_ ° -0_} Ga e/ 35001- .(L) -1—• aG u6 g 4=+ §. 0 LL 2 E • 0_=200= 2 < 0_ _ > 7. mmz#= ££=ag m \ -� \.w o== 5 =c =4$ w%§§� `� -fi \\\\r mm� =� = 003.E )7 E= 2%\\02 e- =E =a 0.) L.: &222(8 \,_u, o0_ wm =>�` O .2-o- 0 -= 2(k&R® IQo,ww • __®_ 2-E = •-• �_© -6 _� °° =®G = §� \ =�k =.g7 ° == a#1- ®G& /k4�3\ 22 = "§ 08`7®7 5=> S= °\. \�ƒ /c— « G /fEa \k� ®E4 t) 2 ��_� 6««\8/ -__._» z ®- owo 25=2 =0 • > -_ ^� * .Sƒ »mot /02§0 t`t =7y #w 2 > -._0w �= 06 &E== 22E'E Ewa) pt±= '0 0.k 02 0 \ "/\ oOG)W e0 =.=Eu_= __ ® =�E _._ 0c0U 0/c 0a)> � //E E __� \ 7)03 e= \ §� }`/��52 mt� • C e &2 2 t£0£ c Q -1-o =.0 Ed2wwE0� m ='0> oa - - 555E %�¥66k (/) wC -0. (0 • _ - _ & #G o= a- > -_ -0.o L_« ° O ( G) -2 0) =cf -o =gz �3 kb.= < =4 _ >d #s =m �0W( 0 -o .- (/) co . \ a bhwA -ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 14a7 bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 15a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' °250w % =e2° > w _ Co % _ ��f0- a= § \ / ®� ®T§[_ -0.-°703 \ % > #6 256=© 2 i»\ �§� #� 0_ _.0 m = y2��§ ee -7\6 %E / >a \ \ « /E\ »Eoioo %Z�,q�2kf3 \tP7=mc -�Ee e / '' WIyG t� /. =w e= "= ==w7( =/ = = %G� =E222 %/5 § = 0 ( :_ ¥ o / #.° >t° 2f\ >EE c z =c = =+ =2= =e ©§qZR ®2032 % /3" y ®§ �c0 -Ea) / \> w: o - 0- °�°© \E4-= §¥±2 E2WCWw 32 =U)t °-eq °JEt�e \ /- /G\\ / /t\ %acs == 03 73 1 _ §�_�w -www3 03 CO -0 2 -- ° \{ °aeg \ \GD / = w q _0 E 2 + � ( e 0 » ° • 0) k \G �"��Ca) 0 -\\ ® e %©2 * ƒ�S =oo <�E \d2 «2 /y« #f \`w o\f o /2§03 » \Eo 0) \0ODo ».gk=0- EEa22U) fm032Ge [7 /e 3 \ \§ &._�� - -J _co %/\ 0w E \ =o / #« § {/_ 2-C u) ®\af» _ [.2� /E 0400E ®(§ %2 �ww > •-jo E-0 Z4£ \ o ro bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 15a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 16 of 55 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' D a) 0 0 Q - o- O < .0 0 City Planning Department 0 0 -O C i LX) 0 C O m 0 03 a) O C U i O) Om CDC' (n O O a) a in U -, p 2.w , -0 ciwHQ m - Z Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits c 0 0 F > D 0 Confirmation of Submittal of Lighting Plan • Performance standards shall be identified and shall apply for the restoration of sage scrub habitat. Revegetation shall be considered successful at three years if the percent cover and species diversity of the restored and /or created habitat areas are similar to percent cover and species diversity of adjacent existing habitats, as determined by quantitative testing of existing and restored and /or created habitat areas. Testing shall be conducted by a qualified biologist selected by the Applicant and subject to approval by City staff. All activities of any kind involving the removal of coastal sage scrub habitat occupied by the coastal California gnatcatcher shall be prohibited during the breeding and nesting season of this species (February 15 through August 30). All grading /grubbing operations shall be monitored by a qualified biologist, selected by the Applicant and subject to approval by City staff. The monitoring biologist shall ensure that only the permitted amount of coastal sage scrub would be removed. The monitoring biologist shall flush gnatcatchers and other birds from the vegetation prior to disturbance, to ensure no gnatcatchers are directly impacted during the removal of the vegetation. The monitoring biologist shall have the authority to stop or direct construction at any time she /he feels that a gnatcatcher is in danger. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, a lighting plan shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes for review and approval to demonstrate that lighting from the proposed Project will be directed away from natural open space areas on and adjacent to the Project site, as well as proposed biological resources mitigation sites. P , O i.i...z'.. L -O co o io 0 co 10 co 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 16 of 55 Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 17a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' c .\ > O 22/\ e a § { ®I®& 0 \: _ <O° \. >j\ of Il §» ƒ Prior to Grading Permit Issuance 7\ e` a/ o ƒƒ yfw( �<=o_ . 03$22 \\ (cotow� E / 12 _ « ) 'U) t�= /+, 5¢Sga§f oa7$$ _ = 7 / -003 G@ ®e E /§& a = c e >Woi j\ &e TD- E Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Resort Hotel Area Infrastructure Plan and the Upper Point Vicente Area Infrastructure Plan shall be revised, to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Engineer such that the proposed water, sewer and storm drain lines are re- aligned to the "impact areas" illustrated in Exhibit 5.3 -5, Biological Resources Impacts Within the Resort Hotel Area, and Exhibit 5.3 -6, Biological Resources Impacts Within the Upper Point Vicente Area. If the testing program determines that Site CA- LAN -103 qualifies as a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, three options are available to reduce impacts to a less than significant level: • Capping the site to preserve in situ; • Redesign to avoid impacting Site CA -LAN- 103; or • Retain a qualified archaeologist to prepare and implement a data recovery plan prior to issuance of a Grading Permit for the immediate area of CA- LAN -103. & \ r 2-o 4\ ao Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 17a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 18 of 55 Party Monitoring,' and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring Qualified Archaeologist 0) _, in U 4=— N E T,m Q -m AE UD Q Qualified Archaeologist ,_ O rn c m m E ��- m �CE _ Up Q During Construction Activities 0) m c U c 'Es C w F2 7 O) O N O j Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 1ga7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring fld 0_ -t &o\ Oj < to Mitigation Measures 5.4 -1b, 5.4-1c and 5.4- le. / 0 002 a - /\ o= ƒCi_ Refer to Mitigation Measures 5.4 -1b, 5.4-1c and 5.4-1e. .\ « _ _ 0 \ \\� o =E .\ / 0 ƒ= a Refer to Mitigation Measures 5.4 -1b, 5.4-1c and 5.4-1e. ___W= 03 =pc0 �� %J\ -0_ _ §\s< e= o= 2= (J) 3 -= 2¥ 47%27. Iwo W ! §o.0w< & /�I 2.! _� c \ 2i= E- W- 7\f §� �a¥� /\ G) - ^«k \t/ /___ k7e\\� Oo 2ow • G- \5\ /f�a=0 >•0-- o ==o�% = $ * §g /\f� \ /ti = §5\ 0__ - e4-N- �0_ >0- oo=® &_% w =®ae#�a2G _ E_ƒ 2 o= E e o e= )� 00 -- w2 #- tw._2bm o b# §/« % a e 7 E 2= e= - 73 U) -0 c0± -'&\ • N— wccw}z.§} \} / / /�� __. -__� -o� W. = =a ®o»$± =380820 6 > °° ® °_U�w° G =� = =u�7 ®� >m /® ® ©%® =aoa °\7w�a c- cg±¥% /w?f22 2WWE° //7775$/0-\ =$ /.E% &o$ ƒ > =)GA=± .If / /�$e 0 ew= 22Q0) 03 - 12»//7/\\ _ > ®.= ee=W 2 ®k \\2\�® /&E Eo0> =mc= 2 =t o E /= - tw (._W0 ®7 \ = *S\ =ego wIZo E c— oD32Eoo Site 19- 180593 (Documented Long Point 5.4-1b, 5.4-1c and 5.4 -1 e. If these recommendations are adopted, the Project's potential effects on the documented historic district would be reduced to a level less than significant. \ a Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 1ga7 bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page ma7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring § 0) -o a+ eaG{ �W0_ Cr /j 0) + G{ �� 03 aj > 0) 0 To 2� + -o •.„.. e_o §E =— OE �C a \k /o /\ \2 �\ < /S 0 03 E � 0- 0 §[ ƒ_ .0 2 T� 0` a/ .§[ E= \ 0 c ''O-) �\ /w 20) • 0= 2$> 0, \� e� 0 E 0 0 To {k eo j =k �\a 20- ƒa{ e// >0 < c C Cfl 0) \® C 0 c 4/ c E k \\ \ - \ ƒt = ® c 2 ® ii ° 0 ® 6621 Beachview Drive (Ishibashi Farmhouse California Register, this farmhouse complex qualifies as a point of local historical interest. In order to reduce the Project impacts on the complex, the historical and physical data about the buildings, structures, and other related features shall be documented prior to Demolition Permit issuance. The recommended scope of work consists of a general documentation of the complex's history and current conditions, and limited photographic recordation of its physical characteristics. The results of these procedures should be housed at one or more local repositories to facilitate public access. «®a-.— . / - / - %/2 _ /\) 5t / °E \ =G -y 2 f e OC 2o\ . e o n §5�� [_ 777-0 °a ! _ = c .702.2Efa E.&�5a \� »e.lL_. - -° =0- 2=0 w0 c_ -wEn- =a%= %± » `2 a= ' § 2&22'\ o ."aS32w a =' - -. o • 0 ± § o ° 5 ° a 2 = =E % >a= K`2a6f •Sz.Rf 62 ®_04�C°0" `® �Eg.w ww- \w /S2k\7ffC E� k ._ o e &® E 3/ %� \ \j\� \ /§\2 cp- - E 0)> o w e / =ya *`. =3/ a»Qef§5\ »¥3 600 W0CW -•W 0 a. „E§t.=H'0_�� ®, =t 0!355 °� = °0 - Ww.- Et; =E§=§§c_ =a =7)= - 2oEG /# §2 ƒE =2\ k00) »c7. /0 00 ƒGy \ ƒ2 ® \ \20 £§ \� /\3 \ \ /\ / /\k §0�)2>2 =._e =e 0 ®0) 0 >_ -0- ° w _ 0 = 0 § fee ; e 1- Q(0(00�52e=0- c - a / a bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page ma7 Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 2a7 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitorin g 2� - \ S /\ \ 2� \ S /\ \ a� 2� E \ -- /\ /0 \ ) $/w ro.+ o/\ cam« .E§< 0 0 k $/w ro.+ o/\ cam« .E§< 0 0 �S 2 kG 0 e= 0> iii W a/ §_ E o> .E » ƒ 2= _ 0) o o 7 _ E Field Monitoring =/ 0 \ a c /\© E \ƒ/ ) t e m .g _ >� w In the event that cultural resources are discovered during grading /construction activities, the archeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance operations in the area of discovery to allow evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact City staff at the time of discovery. The significance of the discovered resources shall be determined by the archeologist, in consultation with City staff. City staff must concur with the evaluation procedures to be performed before construction activities are allowed to resume. For significant cultural resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery Program shall be prepared and implemented to mitigate impacts. Any human bones of Native American origin shall be turned over to the appropriate Native American group for reburial. All cultural remains uncovered during grading /construction activities shall be cleaned, cataloged and permanently curated with an appropriate institution. All artifacts shall be analyzed to identify function and chronology as they relate to the history of the area. Faunal material shall be identified as to species. Speciality studies shall be completed as appropriate. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Project developer shall provide a letter of verification to the City Planning Department stating that a qualified paleontologist has been retained to implement the monitoring program. The qualified paleontologist shall attend preconstruction meetings to consult with the excavation contractor. The paleontologist(s) duties shall include monitoring, salvaging, preparation of collected materials for storage at a scientific institution that houses paleontological collections and preparation of a monitoring results report. o = \ \ r . r f f r Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 2a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 22 of 55 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' O) 0 0 0 O O c C O O N - N To (73 Q O Paleontologist or Paleontological Monitor a 0 0 0 O O c C O O N N Q 0 O N -R, — c 5 O U O) 1 Q � U O) 0 X -O in m 0 During all Excavation/ Grading Activities p) c c _p O O U . 1 O) U E O Q C 0 0 c O U N Q O c Ts ) LL Field Inspection c O U N Q O c D N LL The paleontologist or paleontological monitor shall be on -site to inspect for fossils during all excavation /grading activities. Monitoring shall be done full -time in those formations with a high sensitivity rating, and shall be half -time in those formations with a moderate sensitivity rating. The monitoring time may be increased or decreased at the discretion of the paleontologist in consultation with City staff. Monitoring shall occur only when excavation activities affect the geologic formation. In the event that fossils are encountered during grading, the paleontologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt construction activities in the area of discovery to allow recovery of fossil remains in a timely fashion. Because of the potential for recovery of small fossil remains, it may be necessary to set up a screen - washing operation on -site. Fossil remains collected during grading/ construction activities shall be cleaned, sorted, repaired, cataloged, and then (with the permission of the owner of the property where the remains were collected) stored in a local scientific institution that houses paleontological collections. The qualified paleontologist shall be responsible for preparation of fossils to a point of identification, and submittal of a letter of acceptance from a local qualified curation facility. If the fossil collection is not accepted by a local qualified facility for reasons other than inadequate preparation of specimens, the Project paleontologist shall contact City staff to suggest an alternative disposition of the collection. 4 Z' 0 N - LO N V 10 N •J- 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 22 of 55 bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page Sal GEOLOGY, SOILS AND SEISMICITY Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' \- �-0 a t E - o0o \7 _ 7fE �a3 /a i s '5 :o = co 0— > o 000 / u, ro.+ 2/\ cu) « • \\� c \ e= e> a/ §[ =_ 5 r - y0. / /.- k a fa« .0ITL= =3 oem \ \ -0 <2 In the event human remains are discovered during grading/ construction activities, work shall cease in the immediate area of the discovery and the Project Applicant shall comply with the requirements and procedures set forth in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code, including notification of the County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, and consultation with the individual identified by the Native American Heritage Commission to be the "most likely descendant ". k2» / ® _o2 \2222® _: }_W5— \ / {£\o/ ka ±=Eon .- 0_.o e _ - - = = " I \ - __ ew0C(DC w"0 & w # _ ® e = 2 2+± = %c » tE =a e /\%§ee tat« \._ tee= $3/ &y3= &I . - _�._W._ [ems .�af(GGE0 - _\\q. / &G 41 \2 - =/ ©7 ®�q» E5 » f \ >, k / f % f > b = / 0 5<tE t =§7�/ CW WW\.\ F -66623 .-0) ��a«` EEa.`¥2.© e as ®a =) aE. =t`. =- ea oe= )s =E ±2/ awl $> °»« a§e »tom- °wowww EoE¥3O/ %eowe =0 §.- t6.Eg=£ O -oo 0030 • \c c .- -E_= \ a(6 /C ± � » \ G 203.- Ge /\ =fw %E =\f / =o 7ƒ \/\ = o.w = _c . )_._§ \ *.g ®E y /ta& aye.®= 2 °oo c %0_ 000 • =g 5 k2 o% \E o > _\ t__ E_= __� 'e_0 %)2 _ - `(\ tE/ o- Zr) }/E ® 0) E °2= -Ea • ...z9 f LO co $ r bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page Sal Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 24 of 55 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring To To O O 4- CO _c O N— O 0co c T 7 N CO CO U7 0 Safety 0-)G) 7 O C i 7 Chu O O E - N 0- 0_ 0-)G) 7 O C 5 7 m� O , O E - N 0- 0_ Prior to Building Permit Issuance -O O C O- Ct TO O O E '= > cn > Q N N N O w C C Plan Check Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Applicant shall submit a report by an engineering geologist indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g- factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g- factors shall be submitted for review and approval by the City's Geotechnical Consultant /City Building Official. Prior to Building Permit issuance, a layer of relatively non - expansive soils shall be placed beneath floor slabs. For building footings, the use of properly reinforced concrete, deep spread- footings, drilled- and - belled caissons, or drilled cast -in -place piles shall be utilized. As part of the geotechnical report for the final design of the Project, specific recommendations shall be provided by the geotechnical consultant. In addition, refer to Mitigation Measure 5.5 -2. Prior to Building Permit issuance, permanent structures and structures of all -hours occupancy shall be placed landward of the existing City- approved building setback line on the RHA and the structural (building) setback line established by Neblett & Associates (July, 2000) on the UPVA. c`a 0 z (.. '.'. -0 N 10 10 (O 10 10 m I 10 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 24 of 55 bhwA -ER Resolution Nomok U& % 2002 Page 25 al Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' \: a / Cl- 'E *{ \\ 0) ou)— c $ a.- 2 C0 2§ e > 0. 8E ƒ ƒ _ G\ $o }� -426= ==W0 G= "o= =c®= jii; -§ /.) /2 / g =® W =mom =o0 0 / �_� \*\ /2 § §O §" & o_ ® - " 0- \ 2=�'C = /e= c• >= o0.- §§°\/ 22w0 . « §- >ee �E a $ 2 ) _ _- /26-0c> =eo_ a.° 2 =ems0 `_0- 0 »a= (1) = - E> 0_ 03 G /3�R 20) =. -m= = -0 e_. c 06.92= ® e© - ° >_-) e >0.$ t - Eo �_ =G[® 0E2 £ L\ Gc wf - = o3o_ E =c - 5%° e._ .- «a2 = .2(D C0 2 5§ 2 0 2 • — co o a» _ -_ 5ea' cf\]= E\« = =� 3e =mac° ee®,_ W<02'2a ° S » / .)£a =0 0- \�_ _ t e = ®_- `_ -�� =a = a =E _ '- 0- o ° §/ "\G�\ c =®= =c ®»�\ ° °_ . = > - "o.E- ) °a =�E= = =3=7"� w =)3-. = = =a .(_/ _@ , . «) -Co u, /= = »ae4 • =—_�C- 0)w =9 = %000 To ._- c/ j2 /ff\ o. 'w— t,W>£2 =s= _-0 E.e222 )_ %E =c= >� -0G\E=3= 3- ® _ L E G = a u) I E to o = E 0 =° • _ >, - --° a =o.e =o e = Cr 2 t% /)5a _ e > _ \ k0_ - -' 3 o =c =- ƒE`c3f & ® = == -0= cw Ew%0° . -, w @co w e -oo ®=@ =�§= =c= o= 70 '07®x\ .-= w 0) -o= — 5«04.4 =&= 5c.- _ .-_ -w 4 =»o�=. -= Eo « ®EB ° ± Eo- < =&920_ E92=ooa • a.) a.) -I--, -I--, o \ y w/ o» . =E¥ -0 " / k= Eo E'E= \t2 o = o e «= =c -7\ ®5 _w° ° \ =t o °= E/t g0_ = _o_0 _eo • . . . _ \ a bhwA -ER Resolution Nomok U& % 2002 Page 25 al bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 26 a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' .y .° 00C E3 = U '- CO t � O- o »oo 44 0\ "o 0© Oi 2S 0 ow aG 0 o� T = ° * a » 0 0 c o 7 / = =e 0- 'ey= U) ¥[ __E 2.__ /UU� = < O& /\§( }- »=\ \kD> - =a -.E(= =c\ » c,- _ = 4 _ » » _ _ E � _ " - o � � =.e._ = 2 >03.Cw0 / =ee =- =4F) =E /ƒ = ®4E2 //w /= %yW0 -a.) 0 0_ CO = o ce " = =0E3 3§Epwc :- wee =- - c ®.R = ■ c c .- >. - \ y0 * 0 0 -t - /} \G) \ 2 .- > \{ / \§ * m § c } E \6 \ =7= =k®=\=® 0 = =o�.> e# .__ -.__ §# 77 _&= t§� /yWL0 of ?D t /E °- =ogG30o -___ _c 03 0_0 222§ E¥ aE4 & �.- 0 W4- -C W 92 R ®$fay /2a/ ±2 § ° °70 (1) o -• WaE. --c =\ /»a .! 4 » = 0 .0)- a)- w > \Jy%S� \t2 =7\ =0^ _c0 0 ®® _ Q) u) =E0°o- c §any\ /e7 ®&a =EoSe e = - «/= e ,_ r = g _ -4 —.- 0w _ 07-3 0 /��(�{ �2 ®� =fC /wQC 2oWw.o/ �owD ƒc\7fm0E>0o _ %_W\.= / =%6.0 .ga0e - # c 6 = =®$22 § ®�2 \22» /\ /2 /x\ EG /k3 =EwSw0 _ = /3 §g k I��. -= =2 _o0 c =2333 o 0.__ e » ®©0)/ _c�0(k.E -- 7 /e» ®f\ 4=�0® - =� __ 2 / = e = _ 0 ° ƒ \ /k /(S / ® \. 03w,c =0 0)- == =00 -0 ( =e�=o� o — >, /J §3®t> \ / ƒ\ •e ® ® == `f �$ =D .= -0 Eke = —q.= Gam» Jk /) \ /a \a��/ =. ®=cE/ \\\_ wea OG w =.)\ -D 0D 003 /e0 .... c 04 o \ a bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 26 a7 bhE A - ER Resolution Nomok U& % 2002 Page 2a7 HYDROLOGY AND DRAINAGE Party Monitoring,' and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring . 2/y g \._ _�___E_ t� 2t k\(4 <0 0 cdi 2 \« co -o2- \ /© /&4 2 ±3 0 g _w 2t 0 / \j#» ( \ƒ >,\ w e & To 6 \ 0 o c W 5/042 c • o E c » .§ 2 2S 502 /3 a / § § ƒƒ c0 2ƒ (_ 03 *k° _ /y4� .o o '5.- \\=p oa »// } > (o y4— =\ °.g= /atc %£77 o E > § �0E >�0k ¥° cn oD %. =e .[ 6 »y /§ A bi- annual reconnaissance of the UPVA and of the sea cliffs shall be performed for at least six years after issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, as indicated by the Director of Public Works, to assess the presence of seeps or springs which may develop overtime. The result of the evaluation shall be included in the appropriate monthly groundwater monitoring report with recommendations to mitigate any adverse seepage noted during the reconnaissance. Prior to Demolition Permit issuance, a Construction Monitoring Plan shall be prepared to protect coastal resources within and surrounding proposed development areas during construction phases of the Project. The Plan shall be submitted to the City's Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Department for review and approval. The Plan shall also identify measures for the protection of resources and monitoring procedures to determine compliance. Such measures include, but are not limited to, Best Management Practices, erosion control measures and protective fencing. The City may require that the Applicant utilize slant drains for discharge over the bluffs. If, the City determines that the slant drains are required, the design of the slant drains shall be completed in accordance with the City Public Works standards during the design phase of the Project. Issues that would be addressed in the design phase include: outlet siting, geotechnical considerations, and wave action impacts on the structures. Z N $ 10 3 $ 10 2 \ 10 bhE A - ER Resolution Nomok U& % 2002 Page 2a7 Exhibit A - E R Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 28 a7 City Public Works »y \ /\= kc_ ( = o o =I \// § 2� y t ¥4 \ a 2S 2S k § k § G ss e > e > sn ile o o ¥[ ¥[ ƒƒ ƒƒ _S[== _»\ c\�\§ c\\ . /OcOo .C¥§_ )rifica s u ltai liforni s Cor \a }�» LE 222E \a ®ƒ #> >_a > (o Co \ In the event the outfall structures are located within the jurisdiction of the California State Lands Commission, the Project Applicant shall consult with this Agency prior to Grading Permit issuance for the Project, with respect to outfall elevations and avoidance of impacts to tidelands and beds of navigable waterways. Prior to Grading Permit issuance and as part of the Project's compliance with the NPDES requirements, a Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be prepared and submitted to the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board providing notification and intent to comply with the State of California general permit. Also, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be completed for the construction activities on -site. A copy of the SWPPP shall be available and implemented at the construction site at all times. The SWPPP shall outline the source control and /or treatment control BMPs to avoid or mitigate runoff pollutants at the construction site to the "maximum extent practicable." Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Applicant shall prepare, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, a Water Quality Management Plan, which includes Best Management Practices (BMPs), Structural Measures, and Adaptive Management, under the guidelines in Development Planning for Storm Water Management- A Manual for the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) prepared by Los Angeles County Department of Public Works dated May 2000. The SUSMP is a new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit requirement for Los Angeles County. C es n a 2 \ 10 \ 10 \ 10 Exhibit A - E R Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 28 a7 Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page Aa7 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' _ Z. 2u) \\ / a _ Z. 2u) \\ / a c0 T§ e > o ¥ [ ƒ c0 T§ e > o o ƒƒ ƒ y § ./ / o k o.E .o .o / \ E /> >t t ®___W T > %g= mm7=> oe-/ 0 a C c k ° a[.0 /- §?\ ( / \\{ o = « _ \ __ ?%= c 7 \// 0D D(( @� /42 §«a=.`.. = = =�¢4 %E0 -2 °°® °® U) 03 a = / / /75\ #0 m.o mt 2 /\ °° § [\ 2-0 ® \ 0 @© 'z0 - a /% CO _\ -0 aE %% k Ee\ as e %t in LL = >, ui_ 222= I0e� !e ®$ /o0) ,oar \ \k- ( Q0()-0 eE /3= % % _ ® » > \2 -'•o w�•=$•g /- >( %�7 %2 \$ ®E° O _o c;) a8.? e K$$ f6 e = =e> . #' m m % k\ /\ f E mm .0 2/' \/\ . 0 'J %/ _Q) >a E)] 0®-o z»e • «W� =ate == D- .-O __ \ &E _� /.\ we*$E�.»22 q0±.5E §7D0 =°ƒ02` -0 =g L C -c c . / /.\o/2\\/ = =0a 92 7 7 7 2 2 � \ .- % 0 =3 = \' =%#\22\ m >-. .- —( 0CD //\ • /2w7 /GA`s ±�E §[c §� t(3' 2.g$®® ®% _( =•( =f o2c ° §q q.- 222§04(43 • ... _ / a Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page Aa7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 30 of 55 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' 0 0 D_ 0 4_ 0 O U a) 0 0) a) C U 'a C i 0 u O , O E • i N 0- 0- O O. E c c 0 O O ° O a) E Q 0 a) `p > > Ca) ct a) a) >, C U > •— _ L .0 .2 2 E •- - u, 00 03 u) E 0 0 N •� E a' O (6 N W co E (6 . 0 N .X 0 0 a) , 0 U) U .L -0 L ��°�. Q) 1.- erg ° 0 U�a)Wo v) a3 E E° • "- O '� N C 0) O O O L 0 „.,• C 7 'O O n ° n Q C N co U a) C) O° 0 O E -0 O 0 -0 0 -° 4— a3 8 0 0 _ E C a U-C Cr) O 0 J a) C 03 0- j,_ -p 0 i L D O (6 (6 O m N (� c O E -0 = C co _ L -0 O O) 0) H c '0 U) C O �° nm�>.., 4,2 a3cc0) L>°c o C a) ° o U �o °.E m•8_ v)� 0_ 0_ Qm 0_ ° • O N N O N U O a) O) a) 0't '� L i a) E a) 0— 0 .� f O C C a"' a) a3 O O O W C U C ° -0 •— • .0 N -° O N a) (6 (6 ,F a) >., O O C U C O 0 a) (06 c • N N a) O C _. 0 m L N° C >, -p -O a3 Q + a) = C +' (n 7 — 0 a) _o O) O -° N a) ° >., C E 7-c s a) o_ a) 0_ a--0 — L -0 0) -° _ E + W • E a) a) N 0 (� " N E) 00 N U (n • — 0 a3 --0 D_ C. CO N O N (6 E) O C 0 -O 0 N O ° X °- 0 8 a) \O — a) a) �O N 00 (6 -° co C U) (6 ., D (6 (0 • C C -0 0 C E -0 _ a.) O E O) W (C6 0 W (6 a) a3 0 0 O .Q O- 0 a) � ° — C 0 +� co 0 n a3 03 0 Q Q L O ?l C d 0) N N C ?� - a) ',c �O U) N .° 0 a) 2 03.- -o �'oc�a)oaia)ca) - ° „E CO u,�� m �o 0 ow.-m .,u,m ro a) c 0 a) o.” (o os 5 O o E °°m _c. �Dwa) _c°c) a) a) °3 coo -, H co 0_ -0 C1 H -0 v) 2 -c H w `o-c o m O L aP_.' H • • C O 5 Ot Z 0 -0 D m c co 0 10 0 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 30 of 55 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 9a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' >(fl W7 / / ®« ° \« 2e =__.90 -e00 _° E� ® /+ \7£(� /k 0mwo_cG- wwmSEE \p3«<7w / =f®L-o= E�=�> E q '.ym/ =e %g= >,J /k =o« a =� »Ekoe /°� = ; ® 7E�a ¥ §f 2.gt \w ¥- %E_��- 0) =.e \ = ®=E�y== \ ƒ22# / \b# /° °-C eo %=�=eef#� = 0=330= -$777 •q \k \ /22q =tee o ee - __�__ o»w»eeew�= q2 {wf /2` %2 )W f. =�«ee =o • a= e =«2)=U) \ /.[= )22�= =7y = \eee o�- =U) 6 A' =[2¥332 } \_c a3 a EtEE3$E=E`S // E#�g7\&'U)E#§ - =g /2/6.g� >DD000)00 ƒ /2G�&2 =Wake§ }7222 == » =32 \} 23/2®« - coo - � aƒ 6% - »_ ccL_ -_� ® -== °t\ \o_�t»= °moo u /ƒ®®°°` % % \7�G) %« \ \a °® _Q`_ _ - _� ®_ 'eon ®o =a°=m= = =�a� =o =ee.= __ -> ®a ®��® /2 /E ° -§ƒ == =t \=° -2�f_29q� ¥aka =gam= _._u) u) a&2\ #g\« == e/ =aa /t�� ==\e«\ = > > \E« \ =a == . / = ¥oE $®� 0_ _ °cw-o5 =3203 8± _»�% e -0- ocw ƒyam .-�= § =§ \ «a z® - G° C 0) 4 ' - = -6„5 jF-E W _ 6§p =» E.CE =5 mice\ • £ \ \3c §> _ /� \§om «ayes$/ A7 \\ r 0 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 9a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 32 a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring .0 _ 22 o¥ ¥$ \ 0 0) c0 k § e > 0. 8E ƒ ƒ o o .0 .0 / uo co LO 0 >o) 7 «02 /2- . = =%O -M E $ $ - 0 =.2 7 770 (DC 2 °= . »e= (• -W _ =tea / >a § /\ =«§f=$ =5 =._=.» •E' -0 ��` Cr) E2®�2 \E) = 0) DD 0) (1.) ° <2 (D (D�® ®®- k E § ' ® f § cES(wo a 4 §:)erg£/ «2 \=j =tea= m© >=hEJ§= GE L(1303 L.= e ()G)WD�'. 16 g) 4) / =2f.�§ __ _��® \/ %2 /G / / /ƒ.) =w #77.7 $ §#2 t2[�222_c =2- ) §)® # /2 ? ° °Sq ®2« 0\_ a = CD E =f -0 ®3 __0 _ [ {� /S /\fe\ =tw20u) 0 /t =� eU.11Ly==ya = -0_ 4-02= /«� = =®= °S G§oc .oec . -= 0- e e E = °I�\\GR/ /\_c -0 q c = =- =4. - §a _ ._§_ = E 3 =0= ® =u)K /\__tam «E WS /_0c > )y /_ =D g0- 0= =30 '66 EC -0 J® »y_ =0°%EEf`E =f S�2�ff��: °022 \�k /\\§�� G = ._ \ 'E j j % 3 .c _ .= E - p v= % >>> 2203_.! _a4o #)•Ea -7 «� ° °`_ /W�C0_c C0D 4-t\/ a =fJ §��oG`o =202§ �o >E22 a =a= a.) -f� t E«- o o =- « -cE.!= #=¥� \q }q % \ /\ \w %3 awo- 7 / al \±7EgagtE >2 § / ±j §q2/ . . . . Z ' /o r 0 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 32 a7 bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 33 a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring .0 _ 22 0¥ ¥$ \ 0 0) C0 2§ 0 > 0. 8E ƒ ƒ 0 o .0 .0 Cr LO 0 >o) / /# ®2 2 = 5 i ® • + 2» =G ® &§gtS:§ wow t 7� = /G\ =) /E/ c 0 ° °'°•2= E} }\E9 mC \/ \_2 W W 0 .0 - 0 �\ =E _ ===ca =a= =7 =Drat �`�� // \- G)may �«` _ o e_c_wcw =eEaG.g %7® /2»»C C =g= o__._\ w > q % i » ® ® §77 =E == »a» 20° w 43cc003 �`� ®_° ° ° °3.@ =e / /E ®�7 \f /� _c 1.) e = \uor = /G> , =t®§» ==_ 6O 0) E == ° \/ --o. §c o .- °- . = =c =e =o § » = e o [ = = u, _ & >- . =3 {e = - :: =2 .§c=am.° Ewe= $ =004§ =5= #o= =o4- 4« /�� \72�\ /\ = §�=e+0 » .-aE»� _ wEt kE_ =3\a), -03 47a% *o *E =2.ge f2*2 %fezN•0 -() 0C = g._e ® A - •® ® ° t = > E ) / - ` -0aLa -0a W 00/4 .- >'• -c - o =w _ D 03 w_ \_.» ƒ§ /§ CD 7 ,02%02 /� ®�`K WM e� eEa E 0w / --ƒb G«= . ° °_ °® °� ° ®® \ \j ®k �\ \�_ /E\_ \EoWcocco cLO * = ° °°_'- __- % £ 7 § C E 2 ®� E , .- S- c.g °eG>\ =a J± °{®= om G== =tea co G =k 020 —.2- o >±D = oe=q> = =� = ©c0_0c 03"03c ED • -- /7 = \ƒ co = ƒ\\/; a e=on ='� \. - „, §§GB 7 >0=377�a.12c4- 0O- <IEe.lo_ eeEaot=» we . . . Z ' /\ r 0 bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 33 a7 VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring,' Initials Date Remarks LAND USE AND RELEVANT PLANNING MARINE RESOURCES Department of the Interior and City Planning Department O_ _ 2 O o_ 1 o:0 i >O 0) O U -a N 5 Q CO Prior to Grading Permit Issuance 0) 4) C O C i 0 u 0 , O E i N 0- 0- Verification of Amendment to the Program of Utilization C O ,_ F C C U) ) O O O (6 D O c ct6EcT (o W .2 46 p C C � O C O ( o .2 O U .0 O 6 N N U i C w E (6 > a--� (B 0 >_ 2 (nom )0 cio��co o 0 An Amendment to the Program of Utilization shall be prepared to concur with the uses proposed for the UPVA by the Long Point Resort Project. Approval of the Amendment to the POU shall be obtained in writing from the Department of the Interior prior to Grading Permit Issuance. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Project Applicant shall prepare /implement the following: (1) Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP); (2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified within the State of California "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbook for Construction Activity "; and (3) Construction Erosion Control Plan prior to site construction. Refer also to Mitigation Measure 5.6 -3. These plans and documents shall identify dry season and wet season runoff control measures, source control, and or treatment controls that avoid and /or mitigate potential soil erosion, runoff pollutants, and other stormwater constituents. 0 Z 19 Sri ao Sri Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 34 of 55 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 7a7 Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring 20 ¥Ea E 0 .g \ E § E » =c/ 2 a) ¥E\ 4 E = \ E § E\ =c 2S k § k e > o ¥[ ƒƒ 2S § e > o ¥[ ƒƒ 45 E /\} /� — _ oag \atec e£»E \$ ®2 (1) _ § o�G o o_ } -f e/= >-D / to Grading Permit issuance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall be prepared by the Applicant. This Plan shall identify source control and /or treatment control BMPs that avoid and /or mitigate runoff pollutants at the specific site to the "maximum extent practical ". BMPs shall be developed to mitigate for potential adverse impacts from nutrients, heavy metals, toxic chemicals related to construction and cleaning; waste materials such as concrete wash water, paints and paint equipment, wood, paper and concrete materials related to building materials and packaging, food containers and sanitary wastes; and fuels, lubricants, and other toxicants related to construction equipment and its maintenance. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, an Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared by the Applicant and submitted to the City Public Works and Building Safety. Specific BMPs in the Erosion Control Plan shall include: • Water trucks shall be used during all grading activities to prevent visible dust emissions. • All trucks hauling debris or excavated materials shall be covered or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard; • No grading shall occur during periods of high velocity winds exceeding 25 miles per hour; \ r 0 \ r Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 7a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 36 of 55 Party Monitoring,' and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring O)D C CC O 'C O N E c0') -a a) a3 C O O 0- -o 0 o >, '5 c U CO W Construction Activities Guidelines >,P a= �a)'u�a�i ° Q ) `OWE > o D i `O o a) • O .N C _ E O N N O o C6 a) U o �- > L ' O O •i 0 O °o N 'X — 0- Y N 0 C O C O O WCi VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible § ƒ/ 2 ® %a m/0) � \4$$ m = • 22 § \_ 2 ®.-03 0 02 \4�2 ©/ g2 w § \¥ 2 ,0 0 2 \0) a = -.g e§2t2 O Oc 0 c) �� 0 < . g 2ƒ7 �S J C (2 0 O [ 2= 0 O \f j\= 0 0 \ \c ya: 7 oJ7\/ \ %%/ t 22= / Gƒ / »C yk= o E • -ooe 0.2 o e£ *2 �/k m o 0) g - \ \ = ƒ 6000 t%a w o , ®R�`\ w2 2 TD E=ec. 7 +' \.EE 2$'[#20 e » =a° =g = / t 7 2\ `§w a °[E5 _ moo= 52_E w _' d ��§ ®[_\ \ /»_ 7 0 f OC �o (n `\ \[\ %2 - s6 A %. ®2E %// �2 .(o= t 2 G ®/2 5 \»� I\ / ? == - - = \ \/0 • 2 »E O - EE -§_ �k�� AWE /%_/ w73§ .!q\§ \E ±o = ©&\ o / q a° \_ */ #5fq §f = 4 o� -c c E �.= \ / _0{ • NCC ° 2353 .E *=§= E�_«/ To E ` ® ®20 U) ,13 .2 Qo. °)f �2k2� __c . /=�Toc m f \» __,(1) 2c2 © ©f\4-\ / c \ tt =t 032(02- _ /7W • A construction - period Water Quality Monitoring Program shall be implemented that would include monitoring of suspended solids and runoff contaminants from the Project site to ensure that the local marine resources are not being degraded. This monitoring program shall include the construction site, local tide pools, and nearshore waters offshore of the Long Point Resort prior to, during, and following the grading activities. If it is determined that tide pool or ocean water quality has been degraded by construction activities, then adaptive management techniques shall be implemented to correct water quality violations in order to prevent adverse effects on marine organisms. C o CS _ \ a \ a Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 2a7 VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible .g .g _ \_ _ \_ -5 0- EG=E 2®c w E ¥0503== y\ 22== o_._oo o._o0 o O- O / o O- O / w •\ 2 ± 2 \ 2 ± 0 a = .g /5 0) 22 ® / 0 0 0 §& % F2 � \ >/ k/ \§ > §GO 0 ƒ» / 6 / / f3 c7 2e \/ �/2 .§ \a �G\ »§ E �t c> w2 c> . /y =22 . /yam \5582 oc.R , *$.� 1 #¥ \$ \mot >{\ mo \ /> .0 \ 7 E §27 } ƒ2 #f:CG)fl /a \ R�a>0'.(0 c ° -22802 = =a %0)�ak W0C4 -0 ® __ ®W= �t `- c> (1) __\ G `+�=ttky/ t2§ko - o`a 4 *e w°° _ >,E),-~.1) a 3 _ = a ®_ : -e o0 =e= ®.eea'e E ac =.5® Ea =.5 \3 , c= ° ®t $ *• -�i2e w °° 22 /22§ =\== =�«�E2«w F., 33#3 /`2,ui » I- *4.g=® E_ - #c =0 .® o=. -cco =a \ } /2\$4 ©£WE _' =-moo ®EQQ`% \ \a \ /�E . »§e$w =. =2.5. =e® 4_/\ ` ��y = & =§5 =G eo \�0 45 \�D -C 0 )(n•- __ _ W _-0 0) _ =.g 0 p = a o . &u =�oa= =E5.gc.g Est% =�= o °�L- Ct »EE�7¥ oR moo =�_77� » =._ -. >- o 0_ _ 0- - o -« E�«�ke =..e12'�oo 4ƒ00w0- 255.00 -._D E 03 U) /(OH — G e ® =aE 'CE=ae4= >23> Ea 0e ==® t.g ._= 0 E«� § §e# / .CC =o#mof0 ®=�»= e = °a2=w•2. +00 > = == _ = a% 0\ 0 2=\ _ 0 =t» =2SE° oo =�/0006 » •g U) ® ==• -tea®= a "r{s=° �= -oc 5 -0 = ac_ ._»4(% .- Gy.. - ®a= o«_ 220 =>W.�0 EGA =a • 7'3e� = =a.ga_ \#- 0) �-W(0 O' Eo 2 = % /5>k ®/ �` ¥00)5) `2GGJ p =.��o = =c == > = %a= 0°- -« `mow t ° c o o w - C _ o ° o - _ co _ =L- .go e= 0) 73 )�� =2=279E. °- o= o >wc- E. - ®00 (1.) w & = -0CD • - Ho EEwocnDw \2'// C CS / a Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok U& % 2002 Page »a7 Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page ma7 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' a) ._ G .E,„ =2 . =o \a o a) = 6 = -' co" ._ = E )C o- [ =og=ee .93=00/ \a- go w o c 1 o o- \ f �§} aS § .� / § 2> �E\ — §5 g . E o \ c � co 0 ' a G .§ E & / _ W G a) / < t0 _ / /$ ƒc ?e a.) § >O y�$ c ��_/ . /f( ®E \t$ j® ® _ L(r) £ E J 2 >n G / ICAIGS..1 WI I GI I WI 1-W.J1111 LJG.I. y LI I ■my ., Rancho Palos Verdes /County of Los Angeles and the Applicant to offset potentially significant impacts to intertidal marine resources. This area shall be managed as part of Conservation Area 1 -A in association with the westerly bluffs below the bluff -top edge of the RHA. The area shall be designated as a Habitat Reserve. Although recreational fishing for fin fish is permitted, the Habitat Reserve Designation shall restrict certain uses below the resort hotel including commercial fishing, the collection of invertebrates, and the disturbances of plants, birds, and other animal life. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the City and the Applicant shall work with a qualified marine biologist to develop a Long -term Shoreline Resource Management Plan that identifies and details the means by which visitor use of the rocky outcrops of the Project area shall be actively managed. At a minimum the plan shall implement monitoring and enforcement of protected regulations herein: (1) signage; (2) enforcement of posted regulations; (3) on -site naturalists or other personnel to enforce regulations and to cite violators; (4) educational and docent programs; and (5) areas of restricted or no access. The plan shall be implemented prior to Occupancy Permit issuance. 22 \ r A \ r Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page ma7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 40 of 55 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' Qualified Marine Biologist/ City Planning, Building and Code Enforcement City Planning, Building and Code Enforcement City Planning, Building and Code Enforcement di - E E w • c m w E E0) -o w (6 E o o 0_ -o 0 o .5 c U� m W Prior to Occupancy Permit Issuance Prior to Occupancy Permit Issuance Prior to Occupancy Permit Issuance E o 0- U o U (6 E 0- (6 (7 Q U) 0 0 0 Verification of Development of Educational Booklet Verification of Development of Interpretive Display Verification of Posted Signage E 46 o 2 C 0) o w o o o 0) E ,=,, •E N N E > 0 (2 I- Prior to Occupancy Permit issuance, the Applicant shall develop an educational booklet for hotel guests that provides ways to prevent ecological damage to the intertidal and subtidal habitats. Prior to Occupancy Permit issuance, the Applicant shall develop an interpretive display at the hotel /resort that informs visitors of the area's natural resources and provides suggestions for minimizing damage to these resources. Prior to Occupancy Permit issuance, the Applicant shall post simple, but direct and enforceable signage in multiple languages at all access points to the rocky intertidal habitats from the residential and resort areas to advise the public of the area's ecological value and to help prevent degradation of the intertidal habitat. Prior to Occupancy Permit issuance, the Applicant, under the guidance of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes shall provide training for and enforcement of the Habitat Reserve shoreline on a daily basis during the summer and on weekends during the winter months between Labor Day and Memorial Day. Enforcement personnel shall have the authority to enforce local statutes and State of California laws regarding fishing limits and the illegal take of marine plants and animals. Q Z 0 c? co c? op c? op m op Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 40 of 55 Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page ma+ Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Mortoring' _ -_ 6 -o -E 6 -o -E \9 Em E .c wE _/ G E o o G E o o . =o mQQ\ mQQ\ \ co . >- g 2 2 g 2 2 / L_ c >, E> \ % 0" / < [ } c o o o o / o /\2 E c o_ J\ \ :E \ E >_ « / »f$ #a6 >. t « +a.! /2a.9.9 2 -• m = =7»ee.» = =e §«f /3a\2§ \DE��\ /£ o =o =g o .eo=�aa E.le =f =Oo 0) =. /oo } \_ E _ = o > e = o .g =S ..D °.2 -E= W =r= == *2 k&t ±= e =f2\ /( ° °= «2225 e� = = \/ =moo 0 k�[ =2 =% ®_222$$6 \\\ / % §t•\\E� k� /�k 6- c > « -C =e a§2 } /§\ §R =G= >/_ e oEy�/ =c =(w\ /§� \t =f *`E+ '\E§$ /a2� / \e± ±' / «\ ®5 / \\®j .- 0_r =& E _ = =2= E9o24- _� - 0,c33 -0.-- » ° =E\a %= /W -- oo= - « \ {'oecc� o} ° =k= \a o o_oa�77a= =5E _www - 22 E »7 =a`t 0\} A\ =§ =\ % / /\ %�_0- 4715 §7q /°037%7 %75 /Gj = == = =«a / /«6f°°uj°°C = =g =. >= __ =ag -k ».= ° ° ° ° ®e 22 =2 /_ >E •- = = -o/ ®o»# 0 -o— c_c"w Gƒ &- -E- fwo®wwE5.2E2 e® _ _ = 2 - D G) -0) ® «�E ®> ° • - - BE \&fE2e�303 &ƒk »�gEea eco =U• 2u) =� =W0- e o=WO> =_ =W_� =_�� =c �U) o- ® \L_ ==2�"°\ / °ee = }b® }[rr -`C0_ / %G =oe =�=P® -fie °° °_ _> =tee ®_ ® \fk /� =202 ®= - w�_ /m__§_� = o - o ° °SS /�/ ° ®3� #2 ®.^ ® §e) -= 7t »« n�j GW- k \ \k §_04- w 0Q /= #wept»= -'- °� \E - E« =e( /�e«cw« *0_ `2\a e =3=� _ =E / =2 =E$e =7 E®« _'- E =�E° = -W =.g- =k- =a° __ =®=oge %o ac=c�2y0) = >� 203 =3 /%¥2E� % /\�\_�\/ <Eco > \cEcw._ oj—o oo ..../ 0) a Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page ma+ VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process' M, lestone for Monitoring,' Initials Date Remarks NOISE \w :@ // E2 »\ .5 = co •. r o .° o/\ cu, « • (\ 0 0= 0 .02 �G# .y a o \\ \ \• > °w° = -° E We w c0_ ee (e ®0 7c W =R .@ =3= \ \q /0 =5 »\ o =0_ as \ ƒ(20 /\ �� 0c _ep® co /\/« ƒQ7o +o \a) 0`Ee /G .- #&\� ƒ�-o2 ƒ\§ \ao .-R, >' -o E° : >O2rk / °® 0) tow ©R / t.E Ja =t � __ = 2 eta® ®.- t /.= cam= ��05/ _/ il g=2 0= !IUUI _ a «4E 0 o c Q E o • 0 c c C y E = § c o _ c 20 sE 0 • o =e `> 2e G\ 0_ 2\ -e \5/ �.!> EwO .2- �_ a)�\ b/c e = 0 (/ • __« /a.% wEo e ) \/ ee 7\/ 7 &0 0 0 \}& > .g c`� �`� c2= /#� Eo2 0o • _$§ a2: °0- 7�> oq\ \�. 2Eo E// =%o �)9 /02 \\\ 2a@ %> /® = =2 »`\ • \ L.6 bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 42 al Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 43 of 55 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Party MonitoringResponsible Milestone for Monitoring,' O) -O 5' C C O C�aE O co E-o0 o T.5 c O) -O 5' C C N C�aE O co E-o0 o T.5 , To U C = ;F co AYE p >, Q c — o m c m m0- oEQ s�Q 0 c m o0- OEQ ED- o°Q 0 0) o c c T 2 0 w o— of 0_ o Verification of Submittal of Subsequent Noise Analysis 0 U) 0 0 0 C_ z rn o m� rn c U E c (6 ;4= -D o c 7 gi < >U7-a CD Verification of Phase I I Investigation Prior to Final Building Plan approval, a subsequent noise analysis shall be prepared, to the satisfaction of the City Planning, Building and Code Enforcement and the Public Works Director, which demonstrates that site placement of stationary noise sources would not exceed noise standards indicated in the State Land Use Noise Compatibility Guidelines for adjacent residences. Prior to Final Building Plan approval, a subsequent noise analysis shall be prepared, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement and the City Engineer, which demonstrates that all feasible sound attenuation has been incorporated into the practice facility's parking lot, such as berms, landscaping and brushed driving surfaces, such that noise from the parking lot would not exceed noise standards indicated in the State Land Use Noise Compatibility Guidelines for the adjacent Church. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, a Phase II level investigation shall be conducted to determine the characteristics and extent of the potential contamination (i.e, soil and groundwater) associated with the concrete sump located in the former service station in the RHA. Results of the sampling shall indicate what level (if any) of disposal is needed and whether remediation efforts shall be required. . 13 4 Z o c? a) 10 c? a) 10 (6 o 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 43 of 55 Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 44 a7 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' o -E �2E t o t >4& O a : / 0) C § co Building Safety �k \/ we © / / c 5 § co 2S T o ` 0 o f ƒƒ Prior to Demolition Permit Issuance 0 / _ 0 0) \ (_ §/ y& /\ o /= > Verification of Site Specific Investigations ƒ t3 §q 2 7 groundwater) associated with the liquid contained within the vault of the former sky tower on the RHA. Results of the sampling shall indicate what level (if any) of disposal is needed and whether remediation efforts shall be required. Prior to Demolition Permit issuance, site specific investigations shall be conducted to determine the contents of the interior of all structures on the RHA. In the event that hazardous materials are encountered, they shall be properly tested and then properly disposed of prior to renovation /demolition activities. If during demolition of any of the structures paint is separated from the building materials (e.g., chemically or physically), the paint waste shall be evaluated independently from the building material to determine its proper management. According to the Department of Toxic Substances Control, if paint is not removed from the building material during demolition (and is not chipping or peeling), the material could be disposed of as construction debris (a non- hazardous waste). The landfill operator shall be contacted in advance to determine any specific requirements they may have regarding the disposal of lead -based paint materials. 0 = r a o r a = \ a Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 44 a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 45 of 55 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' Building Safety City Public Works Dept. Certified Contractor Building Building Safety Prior to Demolition Permit Issuance Prior to Demo Permit Issuance During Demolition Prior to Grading Permit Issuance Verification of Completion of Asbestos Survey Verification of Field Procedures Field Procedures Verification of Soil Sampling Prior to the commencement of any remedial work and consistent with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), building owners shall conduct an asbestos survey to determine the presence of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs). Prior to Demolition Permit issuance, areas shall be sampled as part of an asbestos survey. Any demolition of the existing building shall comply with State law, which requires a contractor, where there is asbestos - related work involving 100 square feet or more of ACMs, to be certified and that certain procedures regarding the removal of asbestos be followed. Soil sampling of the agricultural portion of the RHA shall be conducted to determine the presence or absence of banned agricultural pesticides, prior to Grading Permit issuance. 4Z U w o 16 4_ 0 16 0) 0 16 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 45 of 55 Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 46 a7 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' Q) \ 0) c » CO 2S 2 § e > a/ ¥ E ƒƒ _(} 0b\ /y\ oOc / �\ E_ /_ =2= @«] %°_ } -,& _.___ ��\ =f 03 -00 o00— / °a =f e = w ` = =E §6 o._ • _ O(.5 \® .0) o 5\ a >= » °a = = a / / = o» .- -c C( 2 \ / /\ /a 2 -0 ° = =E 7.g.= « o = G'oG) §I /S =f O.eeee0 2 = e H = _w£— = —=e2L- °° §ago a E/§ =E =2 )_�¢_0 0- "_ �7 § ƒG� E&� 0 0y -0 co $_%°[ "�°° e cC 22 ==\ E =.g = \ » G W 2e>-0) 0) —/ ems = ===ate` = =4 =%tef j25�$= —_ o_ ® E =�=a2 o -' =mom ® =\E ®° ® • = = 7 = f« 0- 73 �o =1 )Cc /`E�ct / /\§} 22 / /t[= --' ( /k»\\ /E % _ 0 —.--' W c\2 =2000a =e • = = =o ®e = " =o® (1.) _c =o %moo ) t2q£\wG2= >o0.Eeee -owc E *t§oo3= ®— =q " = °8°_) \« ° °e ®2t �� = 03 (.`_¥7 %2/46 e • • _ _ ® _ _ _ ee§ /_ �«�`_ ® = =o « �®� *3E\ 0,.<�ak=® ' _= >{ =�eo = =\ G) —.- W ®° ®_ k = - — � _ § ®S= /E / =\ //k Cr = �= E ■ GOCOC( /O <C o 2# \0Cyf\\/ [2 =�G / /NID_0 q ® % e % \gE773a35== • 0 \ a Exhibit A -ER Resolution No. 2002-34 May 7, 2002 Page 46 a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 47 of 55 Party Monitoring,' and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring City Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Building Safety Building Safety di -o 5 cc w C O w E c0) -o w ° c O O E o 0 o T 5 c Um w Prior to Demolition Permit Issuance Prior to Demolition Permit Issuance or Modification to the Point Vicente Bunker Prior to Grading Permit Issuance 0 O c m c o-0 0) c ou) -5 _ a3 s 0 Verification of Coordination with United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service Verification of Completion of Site Specific Investigation Verification of Soil Sampling 4_ 0 0 ,� c O w .o c m O_ O O `g O U o 0 > Prior to Demolition Permit issuance, the Project Applicant shall coordinate with the appropriate authorities from the United States Department of Interior, National Park Service regarding any proposed modifications to the Nike missile silos. Prior to Demolition Permit issuance or modification to Battery 240, a site specific investigation to determine the contents of the interior shall be conducted. In the event that hazardous materials are encountered, they shall be properly tested and then properly disposed of prior to modification /demolition activities. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, soil sampling of the agricultural portion of the Upper Point Vicente Area shall be conducted to determine the presence or absence of banned agricultural pesticides. The proposed golf course design shall be modified prior to plan check submittal of grading plans approval, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, pursuant to the recommendations cited in the Golf Safety Study contained in Appendix 15.11, Golf Course Peer Review and Safety Analysis, of this EIR (September 15, 2000) as follows: Hole #1. Additional support (i.e., higher JJ' 0 Z O r 10 O 10 , O 10 a3 O 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 47 of 55 bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 48 a7 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' \\ ƒ{ `%e 2 ° 0- \ EW 0 /�� ®/ 73 00 _ _ 302/ 2 =E __ _%_ %a% o= 6�` #2» = >f a0 IE= /L- /[ \ °\ /// a\ / \\ \ }7�E 2= / = =a�=\� O -0 �=Gtq%%a ('3 ` ¥ a J b e e a = 7f` =53({%22 2/k \0( \\2 24E \c §./k/ = -_ _° =02= �® } -° �\�_ /0- 0 = f * _ _ = _#� /-a..— ±G/ o E w( °° _c° _o co = =2. /m . —°w �= =f= % -- \\}f�# =2 k o g" ..a o w�� $��_ ®�� #`® �» ° \y7— § =E"a« • (4-ey`= a =32 ° = =t '5 .\_ I& =e F— no .5 -0 // */ =e 7& _ ° o\ fl C -{} ƒE� ` ( « �°° \�- = E D >2 Li- //* ® II) #\/ _®_ %%» �§ }f 0_ �* C \ k/ °k .2� 5_c - y = o 'f, -c /%\ =7 /\ °° ® \�= 22 _�) /.Ea //t `(\ $__ \/® ¥ ° + _o -c a`(( \ \2® a' -a/ -,,IC ° e - a) %c =f 1a)o N- a =. # = -,2 / \72 kp$ 0263 . ...N7 »ate 2 § r o bhNA - ER Resolution Nomok May % 2002 Page 48 a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 49 a7 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' \f 00 44(1) $2� =® _®$0 /(0 / pin \.2 -0 a.) E.E \(tt /\ 2 q>44�2 tea® ®M / %e� /6= ` /a�ey/ �_ § 22a %� } a.cr��% o =w "e�� ,02� (1)N- U)03 /��c %3 >, == =Q �aa0•(, 0 kLo \� »[¥� �� =f t %_. §$�___� k /gE77§ • I 2a '�»» =f} °-W0 2wF2oe o /2` \J. =< °\§ -°- ® ® ==��e =« =7 =e-r >w °®_ ®00 2� = ®0 \@�+$k% /3 ®�/a�� 2= && /\ /3p\/ ato e.a =R =� A% - - - . °j ® »aa2 /\�k ®G E_�= = -2.- =m §°fa2 ># E7°W =ƒ UH &22\2 /* */k// ° o e= ED_ .E w= 42.-F, _0 = -0 `± (Zj§ \�ae 0 E $�E2 _c /W e= ®2 02f\ƒ I CC 0.2 7 _ ° =\ Sao 27 -' = a 0_ _$ u. -C W =_ /Ja.E �G °° -0 ff e e o w C C E * _o - k$ «_ ) \\ =® W 2a _0 \/ _ \= ƒe c • 22 =D ƒG /% _c :/ `` �c \/ % ®2 ® \/ y)c e/ § =w - _Q) \ \\ 7\� >�_ 202/ • ...(;1D o »ate .0 r 0 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution Nomok May 7, 2002 Page 49 a7 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 50 of 55 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' 6- 5' cc w E m m E c0) -o w (13 c O O o -o U o T 5 c Um w 0 w c To c m_-' m 0 Eb o-0 0) 0 c OY a3 s 0 Verification of Golf Course Modifications mounding) shall be added on the back left. The cart path shall be relocated behind the back tee and down the left-hand side. Hole # 8. The landform to the right of the eighth The proposed practice facility design shall be modified prior to Plan Check submittal of Grading Plans approval to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, pursuant to the recommendations cited in the Golf Safety Study contained in Appendix 15.11, Golf Course Peer Review and Safety Analysis, of this EIR (September 15, 2000). One of the following modifications to the practice facility's design shall be implemented: m L0 O -D L(i Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 50 of 55 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 51 of 55 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' City Planning, Building and Code Enforcement O) -o c c c o E 0 0 o .w c a, w 73 w E Q a, 0- 0 'O O U Q O o m Um w Prior to Delivery 0) c o o m O O - 4/3") c CO J Verification of Proof of Fire Ant "Clean" Landscape N +5 LL N o E c 0) (6 O C 0) ) .d O O O 0_ >< • The low area between the range and property boundary shall be excavated out. The range's elevation shall be decreased by between 10 and 15 feet and then revegetated with native materials; or • The elevation of the driving range tee shall be lowered to approximately the 230 -foot elevation. Prior to delivery to the UPVA and the RHA, all nursery stock and other items likely to carry fire ants shall be inspected for their presence and identified as free of ants by the landscape and native plant nursery used for the Project. The Project Applicant shall develop for the suppression of fire ants a Fire Ant Management Program. The Program shall be included as part of the Landscaping Plans for both the UPVA and RHA and shall be submitted for review and approval to the City Planning Department or City approved Biologist Consultant prior to Landscape Plan approval. The Program shall include measures that (1) identify appropriate treatments that can be administered most effectively and at the right times, (2) identify the area to be managed and establish a level of acceptable pest presence /damage /tolerance, (3) establish regular monitoring visits as part of the landscape maintenance program, and (4) treat infestation when monitoring indicates that the situation exceeds the established level of presence. . Z i.i f •C) O C O 10 O (6 O 10 AD O 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 51 of 55 VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Party Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks PUBLIC SERVICES r3uiiuiny anu Code Enforcement 0) � CC .E m CE m-t E as 0_ ■ m U0 ref MIL issuance 0) G) C U m m i 0 u O , O E i N O O l.onsurlauon wlln Fire Department C L N o § C c m 0 Q .a '2 D U+-• 0 F 7 ( > o 5 U7 lne rroJecl bypIICan1 Sr l "dll UOnSUII WRn we LOS Angeles County Fire Department with respect to avoidance of Helispot Pad #53A or the provision of an alternate pad within the Project area. The Project Applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department, implement the following measures: • Minimize number of compact parking spaces; • Maximize required signage; • Provide Sheriff's Department a minimum of 30 days prior notice of upcoming events; and • Provide additional traffic control measures beyond public traffic signals at the main entrance to the Resort. '5 U, z - N Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 52 of 55 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 53 of 55 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitorin g U Q N Co 0- U) > Y O U U Q 4- - N 6 Co 0- fn 0) > Y C -' = O -0 - U C CO 0 0) G) C >+ Q C N o 2 0 0) G) C U -O C T O i U) O O, O 0- 0_ TO 7 O Q - O U (6 N > _0 > U7 _C -2 O C U O U ±= O o UJ UD The Project Applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department, implement the following on an on -going basis: • Grasscycle, use as mulch, or compost all greenwaste generated from the Golf Course; • Recycle all bottles, aluminum cans, glass, and foodwaste. The foodwaste generated on -site may be used for composting efforts if the Project Applicant desires; and • Annual reports shall be prepared and submitted to the City Public Works Department on the progress of the recycling program. This report shall include the amount of tonnage which has been diverted to trash, recycling, composting and grasscycling. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Project Applicant shall consult with the U.S. Coast Guard regarding the 40 -foot wide electrical easement which exists on the UPVA. The Applicant shall either underground or relocate this electrical utility line; however, electrical service to the Coast Guard shall not be interrupted. Additionally, the Project Applicant shall consult with the U.S. Coast Guard regarding the provision of a vehicle access road to the U.S. Coast Guard site. c O V z Lo 00 Lo Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 53 of 55 VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Party Monitoring,' and Monitoring Responsible Mitigation Measure /Conditions of Approval Reporting Process Milestone for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION City Public Works Dept. City Public Works Dept. City Public Works Dept. City Public Works Dept. 0) ._, CC 'E N CE c (6 >.■ ED_ • 0 Prior to Occupancy Permit Issuance Prior to Occupancy Permit Issuance Prior to Occupancy Permit Issuance Prior to Occupancy Permit Issuance E o 0- O U co — c (6 U) Q U) 0 0 0 Verification of Roadway Construction Verification of Roadway Construction Verification of Roadway Construction Verification of Roadway Construction O c O O O .( D i O (6 -r,', E O c N Et O > 0 Prior to Occupancy Permit issuance, Palos Verdes Drive South, adjacent to the Project site, shall be widened to it's ultimate width as a 100 foot right -of -way. Prior to Occupancy Permit issuance, a 150 -foot minimum left turn pocket shall be provided for vehicles traveling west on Palos Verdes Drive South and desiring to turn left into the main access to the Project site. Prior to Occupancy Permit issuance, access to the driving range shall be restricted to right turns in /out only. Prior to Occupancy Permit issuance, a traffic signal shall be installed by the Project Applicant at the Project Entrance (NS) at Palos Verdes Drive South (EW). Prior to Occupancy Permit issuance, the Project Applicant shall be responsible for their fair share of the following roadway improvements as detailed in Table 5.12 -11, Project Fair Share Contribution, or other such measure(s) as the City determines are necessary to adequately mitigate the project's impacts on the intersection: • Silver Spur Road (NS) at Hawthorne Boulevard (EW) - Restripe south leg with two left turn lanes, one through lane and one right turn lane and - Provide north leg with one left turn lane, two through lanes and one right turn lane 0 Z 5.12 -1 a N r 10 5.12 -1 c N r 10 N r 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 54 of 55 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 55 of 55 Party Monitoring Responsible Milestone for Monitoring,' City Public Works Dept. City Public Works Dept. City Planning, Building and Code Enforcement At the time of preparation of Final Grading, Landscape and Street Improvement Plans In conjunction with detailed Construction Plans 0) c 0 C9 c 0 Further Review Plans Verification of Implementation Verification by City • Hawthorne Boulevard (NS) at Palos Verdes Drive North (EW) - Provide west leg with one left turn lane, one shared left/ through lane, one through lane and one right turn lane • Western Avenue (NS) at 25th Street (EW) - Provide east leg with one left turn lane, two through lanes and one right turn lane Sight distances at the Project entrances shall be further reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans /City of Rancho Palos Verdes sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans. Internal traffic signing /striping shall be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the Project. The use of public parking areas for hotel /golf uses shall be restricted unless approval from the City is obtained. ,9 .i w = O 10 O m 10 5.12-3b 10 Exhibit A - EIR Resolution No. 2002 -34 May 7, 2002 Page 55 of 55